20071212 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20101123

14
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 3 (2010) ANNUAL MONITORING
BROWN MARSH SWAMP STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION SITE
Robeson County, North Carolina Fti 2� 4IS40
Hydrologic Unit 03040204037010 of the Lumber River Basin 4 & , ���0
Contract No. 16 -DO603 8 4'11 a
If
Prepared for: r ,�
Affeqienment 0".
p'06kAM
NCDENR- Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Boulevard, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
November 2010

Prepared by:
KO ASSO:CIAES PC
Consulting; Engineers.
`A F1oceRCe' &�Hutchesorranc. Company:
Ko & Associates, P.C.
Florence & Hutcheson, Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919.851.6066
919.851.6846 (fax)
For:
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site (Site) is located one mile east of the North Carolina and South
Carolina state line, and is approximately 15 miles southwest of the Town of Lumberton, in Robeson
County. The Site is situated due east of the intersection of Cotton Valley Road and McCormick Road,
approximately one mile south of Interstate 95. The Site is located within United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03040204037010 (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality Subbasin 03- 07 -55) of the Lumber River Basin and will service the USGS 8 -digit
Cataloging Unit 03040204. The Site was identified to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program in meeting its stream and wetland restoration goals.
Primary activities at the Site included 1) stream restoration, 2) wetland restoration, 3) soil scarification,
and 4) plant community restoration. Project restoration efforts provided 5004 Stream Mitigation Units
and 5.0 Nonriverine Wetland Mitigation Units.
Seventeen vegetation plots (10 -10 meters by 10 meters and 7 -20 meters by 5 meters in size) were
established and permanently monumented. These plots were surveyed in August 2010 for the Year 3
(2010) monitoring season. Based on the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at
793 planted stems per acre surviving in Year 3 (2010). The dominant species identified at the Site were
planted stems of silky dogwood (Corpus amomum), elm (Ulmus sp.), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda), and swamp chestnut oak (Quercus
michawdi), and natural recruits of red maple (Acer rubrum). No vegetation problem areas were noted
during the Year 3 (20 10) monitoring season.
Twenty cross - sections and longitudinal profiles within five 600 -foot reaches were measured for the Year
3 (2010) monitoring season. Asa whole, monitoring measurements indicate minimal changes in both the
longitudinal profile and cross - sections as compared to as -built data. The channel geometry compares
favorably with the emulated, stable E/C type stream reach as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and
as constructed. Current monitoring has demonstrated dimension, pattern, and profile were stable over the
course of the monitoring period. No stream problem areas were noted during Year 3 (20 10) monitoring.
Two onsite groundwater gauges and one reference groundwater gauge were maintained for the Year 3
(2010) monitoring season. Monitoring Gauge 2 was inundated/saturated within 12 inches of the surface
for greater than 12.5 percent of the growing season while Gauge 1 was just shy of success criteria with
inundation/saturation within 12 inches of the surface for 11.8 percent of the growing season. In addition,
the reference gauge did not meet success criteria for the Year 3 (20 10) monitoring season and rainfall was
well -below normal for the month of April. No wetland problem areas were noted during Year 3 (2010)
monitoring.
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for vegetation, stream, and hydrology attributes in the
Third Monitoring Year (2010).
Page i
KO & Ass6a=s, P.C.
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... ............................... i
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................... ..............................1
1.1 Location and Setting ....................................................................................... ..............................1
1.2 Project Objectives .......................................................................................... ...............................
1
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach ......................................... ...............................
1
1.4 Project History and Background ...................................................................... ..............................3
1.5 Monitoring Plan View ..................................................................................... ..............................5
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ............................... ............................... 5
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .................................................................................. ............................... 5
2. 1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria ......................................................... ..............................5
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas ........................................................... ..............................6
2.2 Stream Assessment ........................................................................................ ............................... 6
2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria ............................................................... ..............................6
2.2.2 Bankfull Events ......................................................................... ...............................
7
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas ................................................................ ............................... 8
2.2.4 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .............. ..............................8
2.2.5 Quantitative Stream Measurements .......................................... ...............................
10
2.3 Wetland Assessment ...................................................................................... .............................10
2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria ............................................................ .............................10
2.3.2 Wetland Problem Areas ............................................................. .............................10
2.3.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment .................................................... ...............................
10
3.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... .............................18
4.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. .............................20
List of Figures ,
Figure1. Vicinity Map ............................................................................................. ..............................2
List of Tables
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives .................................................. ..............................3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................ ..............................4
Table 3. Project Contacts Table ................................................................................ ..............................4
Table 4. Project Background Table ........................................................................... ..............................5
Table 5. Planted and Reference Forest Ecosystem ...................................................... ..............................6
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events .................................................................. ...............................
7
Table 7A -E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment ...................... ............................8
-9
Table 8A -B. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ............................. ...............................
11 -12
Table 9A -E. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary .............................. ..........................13
-17
Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment for Year 3 ( 2010) ......................................... .............................18
Table 11. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results ............................................... ...............................
19
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results .......................................... ...............................
19
KO & ASSOCIATES; P C. Page ii
Consulting Engineers
A.Fiorence & Hutcheson, Inc- Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
Appendices
APPENDIX A. VEGETATION DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX B. GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA
1. Tables B1 -B5. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
2. Cross- section Plots and Tables
3. Longitudinal Profile Plots
APPENDIX C. HYDROLOGY DATA
1. 2010 Groundwater Gauge Data
2. Figure C1. Annual Climactic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
APPENDIX D. MONITORING PLAN VIEWS
® KO & ASSOCIATES, P C. Page iii
Consulting, Engineers
6 A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The Site is located one mile east of the North Carolina and South Carolina state line, and approximately
3.2 miles southeast of the town of Rowland (Figure 1). The center of the Site has a latitude and longitude
of 034° 29' 31.85" N and 079° 16' 26.87" W. The Site is situated due east of the intersection of Cotton
Valley Road (SR 2492) and McCormick Road (SR 2491), approximately one mile south of Interstate 95.
The Site is located within United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local
Watershed 03040204037010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasin 03- 07 -55)
of the Lumber River Basin and will service the USGS 8 -digit Cataloging Unit 03040204 (USGS 1974,
NCWRP 2003). The Site was identified to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) in meeting its stream and wetland restoration goals.
Directions to the Site from Raleigh, North Carolina, are as follows:
➢ Take Interstate 40 East for approximately 18 miles to Interstate Highway 95 (1 -95) South
➢ Take I -95 South for approximately 80 miles to Exit 2, North Carolina Highway 130 (NC -130)
➢ Take a left/travel south on NC -130 for approximately 0.1 mile to Cotton Valley Road (SR 2492)
and turn right
➢ Follow Cotton Valley Road for approximately 2 miles
➢ The project is south of Cotton Valley Road and east of McCormick Road (SR 249 1)
1.2 Project Objectives
The primary components of the restoration project included 1) construction of a stable, riffle -pool stream
channel; 2) enhancement of water quality functions within, upstream, and downstream of the Site; 3)
creation of a natural vegetated buffer along restored stream channels; 4) restoration of jurisdictional
nonriverine wetlands in the Site; 5) improvement of aquatic habitat and species diversity by enhancing
stream bed variability; and 6) restoration of wildlife functions associated with a riparian corridor /stable
stream.
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
A 20.25 -acre conservation easement has been placed on the Site to incorporate all restoration activities.
The Site contains 5.0 acres of hydric soils, two first -order unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Contrary Swamp
(Northern UT and Southern UT), associated floodplain, and upland slopes. The purpose of this project
was to restore stable pattern, dimension, and profile to the UTs; restore hydrology to drained nonriverine
wetlands; and revegetate streams, floodplains, wetlands, and upland slopes within the Site. The
contributing watershed is characterized primarily by agricultural row crop production and pine
plantation/forest land. Preproject Site conditions consisted of agricultural row crop production. Land use
modifications including the removal of riparian vegetation, straightening and dredging of stream
channels, and ditching of floodplain wetlands resulted in degraded water quality and unstable channel
characteristics (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
The primary goals of this stream and wetland restoration project focused on improving water quality,
decreasing floodwater levels, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat. These goals were accomplished
by:
aKO & A_ SSOCIATES,P_. C. Page 1
Consult ing,Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc Company

1 1137
1139
Robeson Count
North Carolina
2
\ 2495
'O 2465
rj
ice.; _ .
301
- ROWLAN D
i 2460
2504
130
2435
2494
2492 2462
PROJECT
AREA
2465
2492
2491 1 �
24 2462
Vicinity Map
Brown Marsh Swamp
Robeson County, North Carolina
KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
a � Consulting Engineers Date: 11rU 7108
5121 KINGDOM WAY, SUITS 100 RALEIGH, N.C. 27607
(919) 8S1 -6066
Figure: 1
2463

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
• Reducing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural land uses by providing a
forested buffer adjacent to streams to treat surface runoff.
• Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment loads
by restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile.
• Promoting floodwater attenuation by;
• excavating a floodplain at a new bankfull elevation;
• restoring a secondary, entrenched tributary thereby reducing floodwater velocities within
smaller catchment basins;
• increasing storage capacity for floodwaters within the Site limits; and
• revegetating floodplains to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters.
• Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability, restoring a riffle -pool complex,
and by incorporating grade control/habitat structures.
• Providing wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area highly dissected by
agricultural land uses.
Primary activities at the Site included 1) stream restoration, 2) wetland restoration, 3) soil scarification,
and 4) plant community restoration. Table 1 describes the Site restoration structures and objectives,
which have provided 5004 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 5.0 Nonriverine Wetland Mitigation
Units (WMUs).
• Restored 5004 linear feet of two unnamed tributaries to Contrary Swamp (Northern UT and
Southern UT) by constructing moderately sinuous, E -type channels on new location.
• Restored 5.0 acres of nonriverine wetland within the interstream flat filling ditches, removing
elevated spoil, thereby reestablishing historic water table elevations.
• Reforested approximately 20.05 acres of floodplain, stream bank, upland slopes, and nonriverine
wetlands with native forest species.
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Restoration Segment/
Station Range
Restoration
Existing Linear
Designed Linear
SMU/WMUs
Reach ID
T e/A roach *
Footage/ Acreage
Footage/Acreage
Northern UT
10 +00 —54+65
Restoration/PII
2700
4,465
4465
Southern UT
10 +00 —15+39
Restoration /PI1
442
539
539
Nonriverine Wetlands
--
Restoration
5.0
5.0
5.0
Mitigation Unit Summations
Stream-
Nonriverine
�.
.h t. �, , tire;` „ x i
y.
Wetland
''1 „�
d R11
t
#'' q�
5004 SMUs
5.0 WMUs
,,
s�T='..` .�+., �. -� �-as.Sa.,. �.,e
? >., y
i���rt�`, . �. - ^4. a.a° *�._
�
'zt�i'�'s: xr.� �`..mz`.:�fr
*PII= Priority 2
1.4 Project History and Background
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information are summarized in Tables 2 -4.
FAFKO & ASSO_ c'MTES, P.. c Page 3
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, lnc Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Completion
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
November 2006
December 2006
Final Design ( -90 %)
NA
July 2007
Construction Completion
NA
November 2007
Site Planting
NA
January 2008
Mitigation Plan/As- builts
February 2008
April 2008
Year 1 Monitoring (2008)
November 2008
November 2008
Supplemental Planting
NA
Early 2009
Year 2 Monitoring (2009)
November 2009
November 2009
Year 3 Monitoring (2010)
November 2010
November 2010
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer (919) 755 -9490
Designer and Monitoring Performer
Ko & Associates, P.C.
(Streams and Groundwater Hydrology)
1011 Schaub Drive, Suite 202
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Kevin Williams (919) 851 -6066
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
Lloyd Glover
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Springs, North Carolina 27592
(919) 639 -6132
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dwight McKinney (252) 482 -8491
Monitoring Performer (Vegetation)
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7
Raleigh, North Carolin 27607
Grant Lewis (919) 215 -1693
ONON KO & ASSOCIATES, P. C. Page 4
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc. Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project County
Robeson County, North Carolina
Drainage Area
Northern UT - 1.13 square miles
Southern UT - 0.18 square mile
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
< 1
Stream Order
Second
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecoregion
Southeastern Plains, Atlantic Southern Loam Plains
Rosgen Classification of As -built
E -/C -type
Dominant Soil Types
Trebloc, Nahunta, Exum, Faceville
Reference Site ID
Mill Creek, UT to Wildcat Branch, UT to Hog Swamp
USGS HUC
03040204
NCDWQ Subbasin
03 -07 -55
NCDWQ Classification
C Sw (Stream Index # 14 -35 -2)
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
303d listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Not Applicable
% of project easement fenced
0%
1.5 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in the monitoring plan view in Appendix D. Site
features including vegetation, stream dimension (cross- sections), stream profile and pattern, wetland
hydrology, and photographic documentation were monitored in Year 3 (2010).
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Following Site construction, seventeen plots (10 -10 meters by 10 meters and 7 -20 meters by 5 meters in
size) were established and monumented with metal fence posts at all plot corners and PVC at each plot
origin. Sampling was conducted as outlined in the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version
4.0 (Lee et al. 2006) ( http: / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm); results are included in Appendix A. The
taxonomic standard for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia,
and Surrounding Areas ( Weakley 2007). The locations of vegetation monitoring plots were placed to
accurately represent the entire Site and are depicted on the monitoring plan view in Appendix D.
2.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community
elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria are dependent upon the density and growth
of characteristic forest species. Additional success criteria are dependent upon density and growth of
"Character Tree Species." Character Tree Species include planted species, species identified through
visual inventory of an approved reference (relatively undisturbed) forest community used to orient the
Site design, and appropriate community descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) including Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp and
®'K0 &ASSOCIATES, AC. Page S
Consultink-Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc: Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
Nonriverine Wet Hardwood Forest. All canopy tree species planted and identified in the reference forest
will be utilized to define "Character Tree Species" as termed in the success criteria. Table 5 below
outlines planted and reference forest species.
Table 5. Planted and Reference Forest Ecosystem
Planted and Reference Forest Ecosystem Character Tree Species
Red maple (Ater rubrurn)
Ironwood (Carpinus carohniana)
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Sweetgum (Liquidambarstyracizra)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
Water tupelo (Nyssa biflora)
Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia)
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michazrxii)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
American elm (Ulmus americana)
Success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre of Character Tree Species must be
surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 Character Tree Species per acre must be
surviving in year 4 and 260 Character Tree Species per acre in year 5.
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
During Year 1 (2008) monitoring, vegetation sampling across the Site was above the required average
density with 476 stems per acre of Character Tree Species surviving; however, five of the seventeen plots
had low densities (plots 12 and 14 -17). Approximately 5 acres of the Site with low densities of stem
survival were replanted at a density of 680 stems per acre in early 2009 prior to Year 2 (2009) monitoring.
These areas appear to be recovering well. No vegetation problem areas were noted during the Year 3
(20 10) monitoring season.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Twenty permanent cross - sections within five 600 -foot reaches were established after construction was
completed. Measurements of each cross - section include points at all breaks in slope including top of
bank, bankfull, and thalweg. Riffle cross - sections are classified using the Rosgen stream classification
system. Longitudinal profile measurements of five 600 -foot reaches include thalweg, water surface, and
bankfull; with each measurement taken at the head of facets (i.e. riffle, run, pool, and glide) in addition to
the maximum pool depth.
2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria
Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1) successful classification of the reach as a
functioning stream system ( Rosgen 1996) and 2) channel variables indicative of a stable stream system.
The channel configuration will be measured on an annual basis in order to track changes in channel
geometry and profile. These data will be utilized to determine the success in restoring stream channel
FA KO & ASSOCIATES, P_. C. Page 6
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc. Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
stability. Specifically, the width -to -depth ratio should characterize an E -type or borderline E -/C -type
channel, bank - height ratios indicative of a stable or moderately unstable channel, and minimal changes in
cross - sectional area, channel width, and/or bank erosion along the monitoring reach. In addition, channel
abandonment and/or shoot cutoffs must not occur and sinuosity values must remain relatively constant.
The field indicator of bankfull will be described in each monitoring year and indicated on a representative
channel cross - section figure. If the stream channel is down- cutting or the channel width is enlarging due
to bank erosion, additional bank or slope stabilization methods will be employed.
Stream substrate is not expected to coarsen over time; therefore, pebble counts are not proposed as part of
the stream success criteria.
Visual assessment of in- stream structures will be conducted to determine if failure has occurred. Failure
of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure, undermining of the structure, abandonment of
the channel around the structure, and/or stream flow beneath the structure.
2.2.2 Bankfull Events
Documented bankfull events are included in the table below. Three bankfull event were documented to
date during the Year 3 (20 10) monitoring period for a total of seven bankfull events.
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
available)
A total of 3.73 inches of rain fell on April 5, 2008 as recorded by a nearby
April 5, 2008
--
rain station in Lumberton
September 6, 2008
A total of 4.6 inches of rain fell on September 5 -6, 2008 as recorded by a
See below
nearby rain station in Lumberton*
A total of 2.0 inches of rain fell on February 28 -March 1, 2009 as recorded
March 1, 2009
by a nearby rain station in Lumberton *. In addition wrack was documented
--
within the flood lain during a Site visit.
A total of 3.3 inches of rain fell on November 10 -12 2009 as recorded by a
November 11, 2009
nearby rain station in Lumberton* resulting from Tropical Storm Ida
1 -2
A total of 2.7 inches of rain fell on May 22 -24, 20 as recorded by a
May 23, 2010
*0
nearby rain station in Lumberton*.
--
A total of 2.9 inches of rain fell on July 27, 2010 as recorded by a nearby
July 27, 2010
rain station in Lumberton*.
--
A 7.7 -inch* rainfall event occurring between September 26 -30, 2010 as
September 27, 2010
recorded by a nearby rain station in Lumberton*.
--
*Weather Underground 2010
KO & ASSOCIATES, P.. C. Page 7
Fur
Consulting, Engineers
A Florence E. Hutcheson, Inc. Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas
No stream problem areas were documented within the Site during the Year 3 (20 10) monitoring period.
2.2.4 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Each stream reach was visually inspected during the Year 3 (20 10) monitoring period using eight feature
categories and various metrics within each category. Assessment features included riffles, pools, thalweg,
meanders, channel bed, structures, and root wads /boulders. Tables for semi - quantitative assessements of
each reach are included in Appendix B (Tables B1 -135). The mean percentage of performance for
features within each reach are summarized in the tables below.
Table 7A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment: Brown Marsh (Reach 1)
Feature
Year 1
(2008)
Year 2
(2009)
Year 3
(2010)
Year 4
(2011)
Year 5
(2012)
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
00. „�
' , „ "�
B. Pools
100%
100%
100 %.�
.a'
C. Thalwe
100%
100%
100%
- -.z�� � � ��:� 'a, .,.
- - - k ,
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
8180 ; °,
w
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
N���
E 'A WON TO
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
,.. _
CO HEN �
VIII ,��� ,
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
H. Wads and Boulders
NA
NA
NAB`
IS_ &
Table 7B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment: Brown Marsh (Reach 2)
® KO & ASSOCIATES, P C. P<lc e 8
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson. Inc Company
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Feature
(2008)
(2009 )
(2010)
(2011)
(2012)
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
.a'
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
`';'*?
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
�1,40
N 1-10", 1
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
E 'A WON TO
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
i,
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
IS_ &
H. Wads and Boulders
NA
NA
NA
�a
� ,
® KO & ASSOCIATES, P C. P<lc e 8
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson. Inc Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
Table 7C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Brown Marsh (Reach 3)
Feature
Year 1
(2008)
Year 2
(2009)
Year 3
(2010)
Year 4
(2011)
Year 5
(2012)
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
t"&0v
(2012)
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
IRS NOW" -ARIN",
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
1`00-'�E; WSRE
100%
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
" IN,
100%
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
061,
MUM
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
W-WE!
100%
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
at — " V
4,N; C 'A"
K
Mv'dYa iii,
H. Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Table 7D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Brown Marsh (Reach 4)
Feature
Year 1
(2008)
Year 2
(2009)
Year 3
(2010)
Year 4
(2011)
Year 5
(2012)
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
t"&0v
(2012)
A. Riffles
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
B. Pools
100%
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
WINNER IN
191ROW
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Q7W
kW g'
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
N'
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
M
100%
H. Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
Table 7E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Brown Marsh (Reach 5)
12FIX0 & . ASSOCIATES, ' PC Page 9
Consulting"'Eng'ineers
6q"A Florence & Hutcheson. Inc Coinpany
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Feature
(2008)
(2009)
(2010)
(2011)
(2012)
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
-A'
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
G. Vanes J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
H. Wads and Boulders
1 100%
100%
100%
12FIX0 & . ASSOCIATES, ' PC Page 9
Consulting"'Eng'ineers
6q"A Florence & Hutcheson. Inc Coinpany

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
2.2.5 Quantitative Stream Measurements
During the Year 3 (2010) monitoring period 20 cross - sections and longitudinal profiles within five 600 -
foot reaches were measured. Permanent cross - sections and longitudinal profiles are included in Appendix
B; each is graphically depicted for as -built through Year 3 (2010) for analysis. The stream channel did
not have flowing water during Year 3 (2010) stream measurements; therefore, water surface slopes could
not be calculated. As a whole, monitoring measurements indicate minimal changes in both the
longitudinal profile and cross - sections as compared to as -built data. The channel geometry compares
favorably with the emulated, stable E/C type stream reach as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and
as constructed. Current monitoring has demonstrated dimension, pattern, and profile were stable over the
course of the monitoring period. Tables for quantitative assessments are included below; these tables
include data from previous years.
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Two groundwater monitoring gauges and one reference groundwater gauge were maintained and
monitored throughout the Year 3 (2010) growing season. Graphs of groundwater hydrology and
precipitation from a nearby rain station (Weather Underground 20 10) are included in Appendix C.
2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria
Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for at least 12.5 percent within
Trebloc soils (nonriverine wetlands) of the growing season, during average climatic conditions. This
value is based on DRAINMOD simulations for 62 years of rainfall data in an old field stage. These areas
are expected to support hydrophytic vegetation. If wetland parameters are marginal a jurisdictional
determination will be performed for vegetation and soils in these areas (Environmental Laboratory 1987).
2.3.2 Wetland Problem Areas
No wetland problem areas were identified within the Site during Year 3 (20 10) monitoring.
2.3.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment
Monitoring Gauge 2 was inundated/saturated within 12 inches of the surface for greater than 12.5 percent
of the growing season while Gauge 1 was just shy of success criteria with inundation/saturation within 12
inches of the surface for 11.8 percent of the growing season. In addition, the reference gauge did not
meet success criteria for the Year 3 (20 10) monitoring season and rainfall was well -below normal for the
month of April (Table 10 and Figure Cl, Appendix C). Hydrographs containing groundwater and
precipitation data for each gauge can be found in Appendix C in addition to a graph depicting annual
rainfall at the Lumberton Airport versus 30 -year historic rainfall data collected in Lumberton
(Weatherunderground 2010, NOAA 2004). Groundwater data has been collected through October 1,
2010 and will continue to be collected for the remainder of the growing season (until November 14,
2010).
1ArK0 & ASSOCIATES, PC. Page 10
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc Company

R
E
7
U
R
L
c
R
_o s
O u
� R
�a
O
c
Qj COO
� s
R
L
rrR
Q G
00 C
Mo
M
9
y
M
M
V
co
r
tt)
r
n
11
u
II
r
W
M
o
W
O
O
u
II
n
II
n
II
rn
O
N
M
u
II
O
O
r
II
II
N
N
O
II
II
II
r
N0
II
LL1
3
M
M
N
0
o
.r
(O
V
ci
O
r
M
O
C+)
M
N�
N
C
N-
O(0
O
O
O
M
\o
N
N
(O
(O
N
CM
O
r
(O
r
r
O
r
N
O
9
U')
O
W
O
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
0
.�
II
r
r
O
r"
O
N
r
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
11
II
II
r
O
II
II
WLO
O
R
LO
LO
co
w
N
r
O
A
r
N
N
G
U R
N
O
M
U�
r
(p
00
O
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
N
N
II
II
LLl
O U
�
O
r
co
r
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
r
�
II
L ^O
W
�3
Ot2ON
C
r`
N
a �
G
v
cn
O
N
O
O
(O
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
0
°
�
II
II
w
OV
G
7
�
M
r
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
r
II
�
o
W
a v
R
N
O
V
M
u
G
N
(O
UY
O
Q u
L
a
M
—M
9
M
m
N
O
M
II
II
II
O
n
O O
III I
III I
III I
III I
III I
III I
III I
r
1(O
I
Ln
e�G r+
O
r
CO
III
C C
CD
a+ �
x
'x
W a
R
Ln
i U
Cs.
e
ti
A
�
-p O
U
C7
O
W .O
ca
U
C7
a
cv
cv
,N••,
�2
cF.
.0
.°^
.°-
V=.
•�
O:
cZ
s
L
s
s
R�
CG
N.
y
L
.O
�.
L
.L
,�
7
Z
U
33aQCa
O
C,
CL
u
:.a
ca
•D
O
co
O
-=
C
a�
.'O-..
C
O
'ci
O
�00
7
y
L
C
U
O
u�
>
3
��oN
o�
�
CO
O
C
O
L
O
O
U
c0
N
w
E,a
O
O
N
O
N
w
oa
U
"O
• U
w
c
c3
'G
°
3-o
°
c£o_
>
c
m
mss.
-
N
°o
C
i.
R
_
Nm°�3w°�3
c
U
C,�
w
O
O
C
L
i

R
O
U ^
L =
'� C7
'C M
C
R N
_O U
L'
O V
s R
a�
° a
R
R
00
� C
eta i
F- o0
d
C"
N
r
M
M
`-
N
r
N
N
O
O
M
M
r
II
II
II
II
II
11
N
(O
M
N
r
W
r
M
Lo
°
NO
00
N
_
aD
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
'o
O
"t
—
°
O
II
II
II
w
G
:C
(n
M
M
co
N
o
C"
r
U')
N
N
co
W
to
r
M
Cl)
O
Q
O
C
O
LO
N
N
N
M
M
Cl)
�
Cr
iti
0
co
CA
N
M
r
W
N
N
CA
^
It
O
r
(D
O
Lo
(a7
(D
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
°
II
Cl)
r
r
r
M
r
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
r
C)
II
II
LU
O
C
y�
bD
Q
C
M
N
N
N
N
u
N
O
(!')
O
O
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
'CD
II
V
M
r
co
r
CO
r
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
`-'
0
II
II
Ll1
W
R
M
(n
f�
Ci Gr
N
N
v
4+ R
i aL+
c
r
M
r
V
C4 V1
G
N
`
O
M
O
M
M
1I11 I
IIII I
1III 1
IIII I
IIII I
IIII I I
IIII I
IIII I
IIII I
II1I I
N
°
III I
u
U
d
M
N
N
N
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
O
II
L1.I
W
d
Ki
R
I�
O
C7
u
N
Cl)
I-
N
(D
Y R
a0
C—',
V
CSr Vl
M
P-
p
n
r
r
p�
r
p�
N
(D
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I I
II
O
O
(D
LO
CD
II
I I
II
11
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
I I
II
II
II
II
II
I I
II
r
0--
C0
II
I I
II
Ur
pp
C C
r
N
r
O
O
i!
O
O
• =
� O
i U
o
,n
(0
-p O
U
C_
ca
'O
'9
04
i
N
O
s
'_'
O
'D
C
'�
C
O
C'
U
-f)
00
rn
C
C
3
ca
C
ci
w
o
U
U
L
y
C
C.r.
n
y
R
R
C

l
0
C
.O
C
0
u
L
7
T
T.'
C
� a
o �
0
r
L �
O Z
L
R
w
L p
F CG
0
N
0;�
M
L1
U
C
C
W
o-
Q
z
Q
z
Q
z
b
r
O
r
z
z
z
O
IN
++
M
Vl
{yi
r
M
O
O
U
C
-1-
O
O
d
^
�
z
Z
Z
z
N
U
Sb
N��
�'�
co
10
p
V�
G.
m
}"'
M
O
r
N
w
1O
0-
Z
Z
Z
w
O
M
N
'C
z
vii
M
V
z
as
o^
N
Z
ry
V'
Y3
O
V
z
[\
O
U^
'`
M
I-
k
yyxy
0
n
�
o
U.
17S
I
x
-
-
-
L
a
=
a
c
t
v
�,
L
O
4
j
L
6
R
L�
v
v$
fx
C4
7
v
w
ti
•�
a
—
c
a
t
v
u
�
?,n
L
a
V
'�
�
Q
�n
❑
w;f'
3
u
�
o
�
�
z•',
v
�
�
2
ti-
°
°
2
7R
a
o
3
nmm3
m
y
t4:
=
o�
a
,�U
0
0
day
CR.
C
ri,
LY
a
a`

E
7
ri
O
C
O
L
Ta
C
:Q
O G
c�L
�O+ .0
G L
CrQ
C
T
�r
r
r
r
v
+,
O
d
N
�
L
N
M
N
O
M
M
r
r
.s
L
L
a
i
IR
In
Q
Q
b
}
Z
z
Z
N
N
N
L
Uv
M
Z
Z
Z
`2
c
O
O
M
Z
Z
Z
FF
�+
+
G
O
k
M
ol
z
7
OO
CJ
y
O
O
O
C
MO
00
O
o00
c
O
O
4
00
z
W
M
yo
Mlo
C
Z
IX
Rw
C)
E1
O
00
7
_
.,'
b
z
W^
O
r
p
Mcc
O
O¢
Q
Q
Z
Z
Z
�O
O
",
G
z
z
'"-.
O
f
00
•--.
7
G
oo
O
Vl
.-.
O
O
I
W
T:;�
1-zt�
Tw<
7
7
r
`"
9G
1
N
0
N
o
N
b
rC
P
N
G
in
O
-E
-i
liz-,
00
"
i
R
etl
L
i7
L
��L '
to
�n�L '
j
''.i
G
sCG
'�
'3
ca
G
•D
a
a L
�
W
3
Q
Q
c
v
t n
�'U
o
J
7
LL
m
�
s
cF d
O
G
L
Y.
Q
.CG
G
G
'✓a
y
m
w
O
L
L
U
U
-p
U
LL
•D
`
w
G
c0
b
.L.
wh
v
G
O
3
L
G
C�
�
00..
O
%�
E
R
A.
m=
tO
G
L
m
Q.
p
4
r ,.
0.
4
Q'.'.

7A
C
.O
C
O
R
C
R
o a
o �
s 3
O L
L
R
C\
� C
L I
r
N
�
�
u
o
o
o
z
z
z=
L
�
�
—
•-•
¢
¢
¢
M
O
}
U
�
N}
M
G
z
z
z^
�>
�N
ZZZM
i
>
R�
ro
y
N
�
i
d
N
U
N
z
z
Z
M
^
C
O
00
O
GO
c
Z
O
G=
O
'T
G^
N
•--.
M
Z
z
z
.-.
q
G
yt
M
•--.
M
G
Z
O
x
NO
�
�
O
o00
�
�
�
z
�
O
-
N
•,1
�
�
�
z
i
�.
.-.
O
W
�k
cd
O
U
c
o
0
°
•,
�
7
N
O
M
M
^�,
y
�..
�.y
M
N
�
C
_
M
O
v1
^
N
�
M
0
M�
Oj
N�
�
G
%..i€
y
O
WE
'�
O
O
O
to
d
_.
s
v
,�
O
F
'O
7
CA
L
CO
CO
CD
C~.A
C
v
v
,w
W
3
a
Q
Q
a
3
v
o
v
v
v
o
o
N
cn
45
a
L

C
.O
C
L
z N
N
c c$
Q,3+
L � N
0
C � �
Q� O
t
A L Y
Fina
+
+
r
�
Vi
pM.
N
N
N
O
M
O^
G
c�
L
U
�
�
-
�;
N
N
N
M
N
G
N
M
O
O
M
T
4
c}c
S
cc
N
in
7
Z
Z
Z
7
—
2
^
^
5y
94
M
U
°
°
Z
Z
Z
p
C
M
N
M
z
z
Z
C
o
a
r
r
C
h
p
N
N
N
N
h
R
O
N
N
N
¢
N
^
U
M
M
O
O
M
O
Q
i
M
M
O
'c
,__,
M
•--.
N
O,
7^
N^
'F1
,G
N
O,
N
N
Z
N
�D
Pill
}
}
pill,
^ro
x
w
NO�z
p
-,r2
Z
p
c
p
W^
kn_
CN
n
'.�
N
Z
Z
Z
^
<"'
00
4
F!
c�
/
N
dN
N
M
G
f�
p
M
�O
Ul
�
U
r%}
}
y
,�
7
H
I
^
^
Q
Q
Q
}
x
O
to
X
p
o
'Z
�
O
�
�
�
�
�
No
O
,'
o
I
W
Z
Z
Z
c
N
O
N
O
b
G
X
O�
O
id
O
Obi
`.
O
C
C.
V
L.
p
C
s
s
L
0.'
CC
to
.0
to
U
>
3
¢
Q
o
a
E
to
__
a
g
Z
v
0
o
L
o
o
N
w
y
LL
x
i7
O?
C
Y.
Q
s
G
Y'S
N
O
,
U
0
a3
o
e
m
3
Nmm3�m
o
o°
U
x
6.
C.
u
3
CC
u
a
E
7
O
R
i

a
0
v
i r
N _
C °o
0
N
T5- N
eC C C 2
O K D,
•� L v o
� '�• M M O O O' M O B D\ }
FIF T-2
N
��.
.Q N s a R s s CL E
_ d `
acv+ 3��w3Wm3s
s o 0
0
0
N
7
O
'n
0
0
N
7
O
O
O
CD
m V
Ln
rn
W
O
CD
CO
O
O
�
� o
...
d O
0
O O v
rq, at
i
121 0, a
m V

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment for Year 3 (2010)
Gauge ID
Hydrology
Threshold
Met?
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Criteria Met?
Site
Mean
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Site
Mean
1
No
Yes
50%
1
Yes
2
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
3
Yes
100%
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
11
Yes
12
Yes
13
Yes
14
Yes
15
Yes
16
Yes
17
Yes
3.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Site achieved the defined (or targeted) success criteria, with saturation (free water) within one foot of
the soil surface for a minimum of 12.5 percent (30 consecutive days) of the growing season at monitoring
Gauge 2 while Gauge 1 was just shy of success criteria with inundation/saturation within 12 inches of the
surface for 11.8 percent of the growing season. In addition, the reference gauge did not meet success
criteria for the Year 3 (2010) monitoring season and rainfall was well -below normal for the month of
April. A summary of groundwater gauge data is included in Table 11. Vegetation plots across the Site
were above the required 320 stems per acre with an average of 793 planted tree stems per acre in the
Third Monitoring Year (Year 2010) (Table 12). In addition, each individual plot was above success
criteria with planted stems alone with the exception of plot 12; however, when including natural
recruits /Character Tree Species this plot was well -above required densities with 647 stems per acre.
KO & AS' SO, CIA TES, P. C. Page 18
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, lnc:Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
Table 11. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
*Data was collected through October 1, 2010; data will continue to be collected for the remainder of the Year 3 (2010) growing
season (through November 14, 2010).
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009)
Year 3 (2010)*
Year 4 (2011)
Year 5 (2012)
809
1
Yes /68 days
Yes /53 days
No /29 days
486
4`'
607
28 percent)
( P )
21.5 percent)
( P )
11.8 ercent
( percent)
.ice,.,
a :N
'6fa4..8a�le'''+d4'.
2
Yes /35 days
Yes /55 days
Yes /35 days
il wa"�'
�','A "4`d`n+'a �b
,,
"
µ,6'•f'y' %-.
vg8 :'?4t+~'e 4�
728
(23 percent)
(22.4 percent)
(14.2 percent)
971
1214
6
445
607
Ref 1
34 days
42 days
13 days
s�,y>�`qty'
•yp, �F- 1ykjn•:�
a`�`
W„'•j�g p "' ti'Y1"i'
N
1012
(14 percent)
(17.1 percent)
(5.3 percent).,,
809
1214
*Data was collected through October 1, 2010; data will continue to be collected for the remainder of the Year 3 (2010) growing
season (through November 14, 2010).
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Planted Stems /Acre Counting Towards Success Criteria
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009)
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)
Year 5 (2012)
1
526
809
850
!-S-, ��.' r ��r;� p4;'1
;
2
486
567
607
3
445
526
526
1ea5Ap �Mv'`.b .. �•z9?s
SvB �;: a;S�. ';. tee.. ^u.�,�
4
243
850
728
In:rr.'a
Say
5
971
1214
1214
6
445
607
607
7
405
850
1012
8
809
1214
1335
h`� e� °n�;•�ta��
got, 9•k�raY�xis.�
9
931
1052
1012�`R�
XS$d9A:e8N•�'.�H N$i `I
:.a iAl aS` i1a.!TAPi! &E�R.a0 `. ASR
10
1093
1012
971
z d
�f'? °
11
405
486
486
( r r',z1:; 1%
12
40
162
202
it �'�'
13
567
607
647
R .x.!"Q-:
U UMO:�r M MZ
14
162
647
890
15
40
526
971
M 9?
g V0 ;•
16
202
445
526
17
81
647
890
Average of All
Plots (1 -17)
476
705
793
KO & ASSOCIATES,. P. C. Page 19
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson; Inc.' Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site. Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
4.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y -87 -1. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0. (online). Available: http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). 2003. Lumber River Basin Watershed
Restoration Plan (online). Available:
http: / /www.nceep. net / services /restplans /Lumber_2003.pdf [November 21, 2006]. North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina.
Weakley, Alan S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online).
Available: http: / /www. herbarium .unc.edu /WeakleysFlora.pdf [February 1, 2008]. University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2010. Station in Lumberton, North Carolina. (online). Available:
littp: / /www.wunderground.com/ history/ airport /KLBT /2010 /11 /9 /CustomHistory. [November 4,
2010]. Weather Underground.
1 KO & ASSOCIATES, P. C Page 20
a
Con, ultink Engineers
6 A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc. Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site. Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
KO &ASSOCIATES, P.C. Appendices
Consulting Engineers
64"A Florence & Hutcheson, !nc Company

V
E
a,
Y
N
a
Y
c
Q
a N —
Y � �
U Y m cu
Vf
O t`ii Y
L � �
> N
a -
N a
>
N QJ
Z3 u a
y v 7
U
O .N O
O_ t -
4- N
O
m
(a T �
ro
E u T
N CU U
a o ai
L
C O
U
Y M Q)
aJ L U
s Q L
Y N aJ
L E O_
O O N
3 N E
aJ
O 0 N
CL J
v z a
aj H
g 0 E
Y
N N aJ
a; -L, -L, Y
N
s s L
3 3 EU
a a a c
m aa) +cu 2
U U D
o .2 a) m
Q
. 0 •0 c
i a Q
N U U a
LA
O
Q
N
F •�
L U
Q
N N
E >
cu
L a
L Y
� N
N N
Ln Ln
N N
m m
v U
tw a°0
.5 .5
O o
c c
0 0
V) Ln
u �
c c
a/ aJ
:3 =
v aJ
LL L1
N
O
Q
a
�
a.
T
o
o
a
O
N
Q.
to
w
wV
QJ
a E
i•+
CL
M 41
f6
N N
0
R
0
m to
ra
O
a
v
M 0.
0
E
L
L
0
Y
N O
O
p
0
to
O
N
Nvi
>
%
E
Ln
v
a)
N
N
c
O
N
cI
c
m
o
S
O
/
Y
E
O
�o
O
Ln
m
o
'x
Q
`^
N
N
0 0000
u
uu L`n
u
m
a,
Q
f0
o
c
i
a
C.
L
L
a
o
IA
CL N
CL
0
w
m
m
m
a,
I
'D
'a
U 4-
V
E
a,
Y
N
a
Y
c
Q
a N —
Y � �
U Y m cu
Vf
O t`ii Y
L � �
> N
a -
N a
>
N QJ
Z3 u a
y v 7
U
O .N O
O_ t -
4- N
O
m
(a T �
ro
E u T
N CU U
a o ai
L
C O
U
Y M Q)
aJ L U
s Q L
Y N aJ
L E O_
O O N
3 N E
aJ
O 0 N
CL J
v z a
aj H
g 0 E
Y
N N aJ
a; -L, -L, Y
N
s s L
3 3 EU
a a a c
m aa) +cu 2
U U D
o .2 a) m
Q
. 0 •0 c
i a Q
N U U a
LA
O
Q
N
F •�
L U
Q
N N
E >
cu
L a
L Y
� N
N N
Ln Ln
N N
m m
v U
tw a°0
.5 .5
O o
c c
0 0
V) Ln
u �
c c
a/ aJ
:3 =
v aJ
LL L1
v
L
m
N
E
v
N
E
a
m
a
aJ
a
Y
O
Q
s
U
m
v
O
a)
U
a)
Q
N
.c
U
f6
a!
O
N N
E
U Y aj
Q O N
N Q to
s s c
m m >
a) a
O �O Lu
a, a, z
CL CLg
0
aj v c
�o -Fa o
Y Y U
v v �
� � Y
> > O
cu
to tw x
a
s co m
E E E u
f6 M @ X
v 0 M Q aJ
a
a)
a
U
X
a1
v
E
a,
0
c
.N
E
cu
a
c
fd
a
cu
a
O
�?
N
O
a
�
a.
T
o
o
a
cn'
Q.
to
w
wV
QJ
a E
i•+
CL
M 41
f6
N N
0
R
0
m to
ra
O
M 0.
0
L
L
N O
O
p
bA
to
v
L
m
N
E
v
N
E
a
m
a
aJ
a
Y
O
Q
s
U
m
v
O
a)
U
a)
Q
N
.c
U
f6
a!
O
N N
E
U Y aj
Q O N
N Q to
s s c
m m >
a) a
O �O Lu
a, a, z
CL CLg
0
aj v c
�o -Fa o
Y Y U
v v �
� � Y
> > O
cu
to tw x
a
s co m
E E E u
f6 M @ X
v 0 M Q aJ
a
a)
a
U
X
a1
v
E
a,
0
c
.N
E
cu
a
c
fd
a
cu
a
O
�?
}
Q
N
t3
0
oc
a
a,
c
O
`o
v
K
s -C
L L
3 3
cc co
a'
.2
m o
U Z
a a,
al al U Q-
` a C to
a
O
a
�
a.
T
o
o
a
cn'
to
w
wV
QJ
a E
i•+
f0
E
f0
f6
N N
0
R
0
m
0 a
c a
ce Q tA
}
Q
N
t3
0
oc
a
a,
c
O
`o
v
K
s -C
L L
3 3
cc co
a'
.2
m o
U Z
a a,
al al U Q-
` a C to
a

0
-0
w
a
I-
4.
V
.d
C
•N
L
E
3
C
-o
v
v
W
Gl
z
a
L
V
L
v
CL
a
Y
f0
N
oa
c
=a
3
u
X
v
E
a
.0
v
C
m
CL
c
J
aEi
v
v
c
0
O
z
m
R
_
m
O
00
M O
00
00
w n
� m
ci
ro -0
CO
Z J
ac
Y
V)
c
0
a o
E'
m °
Z
ai
V �
GJ Ul
L
o �
a �
c
3
0
co
vA LA
o
u a
V C
v 3
0 o
a co
0
O
CL
5al�ads#
�.-
1.-
1�Lnv*
n°LnNmNmLn
Lnr-
3MJd Had sale ;S
r-I
^
t.0
o
a)
r-
rl
Ln
w
N
^
r"
ai
r1
r1
Ln
.-i
an!19N1 (]nnm
0)wLn
�wvm�o���°rnrn'`'rn
r-I
N
r-I
.--I
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
SLUa ;S Nuln!1 1e ;01
3U:)V113d
m
�
N�
m
v
Lnn
m
�
r1i
U')
T
0)
Ln
m
P,
Ln
r-
SUMIS SUTAIl le;ol
rn
�
�r,
r-I
N
1O
�
-1
,r-
-i
I
r-f
3M:)V kl3d
swa;S(jaa;unlOA)
o
°o0)-
rl
Ln
o�oI;t
Ln
Ln
Ln
r
N
-i
°v
°�
o0
o
lein;eN
3100
aid sale ;S anll
° Ln
o
N
N
`�i
O
�
M
`N'I
-i
co
O
�
Qo1
n
N
o
9N1(]f11JX3 sLua ;S
00
Lo
V1
1-
to
r
a1
t
N
Lo
M
m
Ln
00
Suln!l pa;ueld
3233 aad sLua ;S
O
Ln
n
O
w
N
O
a)
N
M
.-I
n
to
00
N
O�
n
O
0)
r-I
n
Lo
N
O
a)
3ulnllpa ;ueld
00
Lo
Ln
oo
N'T
r4
tD
O
0
M
m
O
0
0)
v
N
t0
00
rn
Ln
00
salels
aAll 9N1 (]f1lJX3
M
N
(.0
M
r4
r-4
Lo
LnWMLn�-cl-W
r-1
M
M
M
N
r-r
r-r
r-I
`1-
m-;t.I:t
N
N
M
N
SWa ;S Su! ^!l le;ol
Swa ;S Ru! ^!l le;ol
M
N
to
ri
M
r-I
Lo
't
r-I
LO
Lo
r-I
LO
CO
M
M
Ln
M
to
N
qlT
r-I
to
ri
-4
'ZT
M
N
-;t
N
r-I
M
N
sLua ;S (aaa;unlon)
N
_4
O
N
m
O-
O
0
N
N-
Ln
r-I
O
00
N
lein;eN
SLua ;s
0
0
0
0
r-I
O
r-I
r-1
N
O
O
N
O
O
Ln
O
BUISSIVU /pea(]
Sale ;S anll
ri
Ln
M
00
O
Ln
Ln
M
Ln
't
N
W
N
A
M
N
9Nlani:)X3 swa ;S
N
r-I
r-I
-4
M
ri
N
m
N
N
r-i
r-1
N
N
r"I
N
2ulnll pa;ueld
SIUa ;S
e--I
Ln
M
N
O
Lo
Ln
M
Ln
*
N
Lo
N�
M
N
2u! ^!l Plueld
N
r-I
-1
N
M
r-I
N
M
N
N
ri
-i
N
N
r-I
N
;Old
F,,
:tLnL�t�oorno,
-1Nmd
Ln
lnlor
w
ri
ri
ri
ri
ri
r-I
r-i
r-I

0
>
/
CL
2
0
m
w
Q
a
q
q\
q
m
w
a
k
0
®
\
u
bo
o
w
N
m
%
&
2
/
CL
2
0
m
K
�
c
�
2
m
-4
r-I
r-I
r4
r-4
k
C14
r4
r-I
k.0
o
r-4
r4
#
_
m
¥
_
Ln
N
m
q
m
m
q
m
$
$®
m
q¥
q
6
q
m
K
■
/
E
±
0
J
�
\
E
0
0
\
_
O
\
%
$
/
y
%
§
$
±
k
J§
t
q
o
m
o
f
o
R
s-
4
3
=-0
c
f
W
m
c
°
o
E
l
±
--
U
q
2
2-
c=
c&
m
k
\[
c°
o
cu
E
E+
E
©\
/
3
E
ƒ
J
0
0
®
\
0
/
f:
§
§
k
3
�
2
f
/
/
§
k
8
E
p
¢
\
-
2
=
:
«
(u
2
m
g
=
®
§°
E
9
E
\®
M
\
3
>
¥
E
=
m
�
�'
m
�
3
e
g
f)
®
E
cn
%
g
n
e
m
g
S
§
e
-
E
e
_
0)
CL
V)
0
CL
m
e
g
e§
e))
3§�@
cr
2
5
g
£§
0\
g
e°
ƒ
e
g
w
f
w
f
2
g
E
C)-
ƒ
/
u
/
/
_
V)
U,

OJ
19
E
m
in
E
N
N
a�
M
Ln
Il
a--1
00
L4
O
�+
C
N
V
O
Gl
CL
3
ch
M
N
M
O
U
orn
N
N
v
m
3
.r ,
L
E
ELY
E
c
v
N
a
L
�o
E
c
7
O
2
N
�U
CJ
G
N
OJ
Oro
f6
E
f6
0
L
O
N
s
O
c
orn
c
Y
c
M
C
c a
m
E
E
m
2 L
L
a,
D
v
= R
N
ci
00
I
N
t
�
N
^
N
M
N
Ln
... E
R
.Q
N
OA
m N
E a
f6 '
G o
0
o
o
0
o
M
o
0
0
.-+
ko
o-t
0
0
0
cli
O (1)
4j
4+
c f6
V
O
O
u
Ln
p
Y
o
d
3
O
O
f0
O
Y
Y
O
Y
cu
E
N
O
O
L
Ln
v
"O
Y
f0
(O
O
C
co
Y
(o
0Z
O
=
N
7
O
t
0
`
O
Q =
y
v
O
L
O
w
O
O
W
O
L
v
v
4,
O
Y
O1
E
E„
E
°°
3
0
3
3
E
O
O
co
U
E
U
U
o
`n
3
u°
co
co
U
cr— u
O
E
O
m
'E
co
>
ro
U
ro
`-°
O
ate+
x
O
ro
O
O
c
N
'O
l9
p
—
cu
O
!o
O
E>
C
a'
U
w'
to
.E
0
Q
Q
E
m
.U%
O
M
H
In
.O
X
N
M
O1
:y
D
,n
O
u
In
7
U
ut
:3
ut
x
u In
E
CL
L
t
�
7
0O
>
LL
of
M
V1
C
U
L
U
4!
7
U
L
OJ
U
i
L.1
i
m
7
U
2
N
Qj
u
C
=
Ln
4!
i
L
7
O1
N
VI
0
u
o
X
z
U
d
U
E
-C
Q
0
!
N
tl
U

O
a
a
m
E
m
0
L
O
L
N
N
0
C
O
e-1
N
N
C
Y
C
N
m
ri
qT
N
rn
H
C
C N
a
E
r-1
-1
E
7 m
L
L
l"1
r-I
c^I
r-I
ba
m
E
-
N
00
t\
Ln
Q1
;t
00
m
O
Ln
00
O
1*
00
o
to
N
ri
r-1
r-I
N
ri
ri
m
N
ri
ei
ri
N
N
c 4
N
M
M
O
C
d
w
m
N
E d
m L
C O
O
�t
�T
c
1�
O
i
rn
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
M
O rw
C m
0u
0
V
Q
N
m
�'
In
lD
I,
00
41
O
-;t
^
ri
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
c-I
ei
ri
a

O)
'u
4J
C.
N
C
r0
O
a
E
a,
CA
-a
OJ
C
r0
CL
e-i
ri
N
N
N
M
N
ri
r-I
N
rl
ri
N
Ln
l0
rn
ri
N
N
M
M
ri
N
M
ri
N
c-i
M
tO
r-I
N
ri
r1
LM
r-i
ri
a)
N
C
N
chi
D1
r-I
Cl)
r-I
`-i
M ri
N
00
In
r-I
.--I
r-1
r-I
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
Ln
N
tC
ri
al
N
TT
w
ri
N1
N
M
N
N
N
M
r 1
rN-I
N
N
N
M
M
r-I
M
ei
N
Ln
r-I
Ln
ei
ri
r-I
N
N
lD
la
In
00
r-
ri
w
ri
1.4
ri
N
M
ri
ri
ri
00
00
r-
lD
M
N
�
M
M N
al
N
d•
M
ri
N
r-I
al
H
_O
N
r-I
ri
r-I
U1
In
N
ri
ri
P,
�
Or-I
M
r-1
ri
I�
ri
C.
H
N
cn
i
Ln
rq
N
.-i
-4
t\
L(
N
Lo
co
E
E
L
L
0
O
c
O
'O
Y
Yo
E
ro
j
C
O
C O
E
�
Q
N
O
O
i? O
M
Y
r0
O
O
C
01
C
C
E C
t]0
E
L
0
i Y
SZ
3
N
3
L
l0
Q1
C
0
E 0
>3
E
4!
O
rD
L O
7
i
3 +�
+�
L
O
�c
E y
v
L
E
o
O a,
�
m>
v
_
u
v
Y
�
O
—
3
3
w
E
C
L
L—
Q
O
V
L
L
Q
u
+
D
m
-0
o
VI
O
O of
O m
v,
u
� C
'^
ro
u
w
L
"
ro
L
L
L
.=
O
—
n
3
O1
C
r9
+�
O
co
r0
L
0A
U C
L
N
'V
l6
r9 C
E
? ._
C
x
C >
'x
�-
i
`�
r0
N
E
N
7
!?
SZ
v+
'c
7 0J
n
E
E
C
ro
ro 6
ca
.�
on
ro
>
ro �
ro
a,
,U,
V
u
O
x
•rO
ro
mn
ri
V%
Q
Q. V
0 '�
LL
U-
H
��!
C
L
QJ
U
N
L
L
N
r6 �
N
u
u 0
0
Q
�
z
O
Cf
u
E

C
f9
O
a
3
m
z
c
4J
C
f0
CL
i^-1
e-i
r1
r1
1-4
N
N
N
�-:I-
1--i
1�
m
r`
ri
m
Ln
m
.Itt -1
rl
cm-i
N
M
M
M
r 1
r1
N
N
rl
rl
N
Ln
N
a--I
d
n
rl
cf
rl
N
e-I
O
Ln
r-I
O
0)
M
M
rn
Ln
r1
ri
ri
r1
N
N
N
N
Q1
N
1�
(3)
M
N
l0
rl
CTl
N
Ln
M
N
M
N
N
N
N�--I
rl
I�
N
M
m
rl
N
Ln
rl
rl
N
rl
N
Q
N
to
m
Ln
r1
> a£i
m
.--I
rl
l0
N
CJl
M
r1
N
-i
.-i
r1
00
rl
1�
lD
Iy
N
I-
4.0
lD
ri
lSl
N
N
d'
e�
N
i--I
CJl
vi
++
_O
Ln
Ln
N
r1
Or-I
N
1-1
Ln
m
I'D
r1
I'D
N
r1
r1
1,
r-
I
M
Q
E
i--I
r,
N
Ln
N
N
Ln
M
I:t
ri
N
N
rI
rl
m
t \
m
ll
00
N
00
Q
M
lD
Ql
i--I
.--I
ei
m
N
N
� N
L
ra
t
t
O
C
O
a
o
O
D
c
>_
7
ru
O
o
Y
0
co
Z
Q
p
3
p
d
Q
v
((a
ro
c
E
Lw
E
c
°A
?
u -v
°
3
3
E n
E
E
E
-O
E
v
O
L
v
E
O
�c
E
v
E
L
o
+�
o
O +�
O L
V
v
n
o
N
O_
Q
E
_O
u
v
O B
E
v
a�
0
u
Y
u a�
to
Ln
0
�
Y
�°
>
3
a
3
f 0
u Lu
O=
a
3
O
—
0—
0
3
to
�,
0
aj
u
N
u
LA
C
C
>
u
+'
X
7
m
t0
'O
O
C
a
j
E
7
7
7
E
C
'hA
L
m
t0
V
O
+�
L
a!
ro
H
-
L
L
T
L
s
L
t0
4�
C
4� Y
C
C
O
L
7
C
C
E `.�
C
N
O
W
t6
7
V
t0
`�
7
T
—
V_
C
m
Q
L
Q-
0A
C
l0
en
7
N
7
i
tD
tD
a�
%
C
to u
a
c_
4-'
L
V)
�
C
U
E
C
L"
in
t0
m -C
N
in
a
f0
v1
in
V
in
V
X
N
Ln
QJ
L
L
L U
�
L
Li-
V)
o T
C
���/
V
L
V
-
U
a!
i
L
(9
V
Q
v
v p
Q
6^>
a
v
v
N
u
u
0
O
z
cr
D
U
U
E
u
x
cr
m
0
LL
Ln

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site
Year 3 (20 10) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos
Taken August 2010
°o
Pilot 2
PW 4
KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. :'appendices
FA
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site
Year 3 (20 10) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos
Taken August 2010
(continued)
MW 11
�lJl7 �
0
I RAF KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Appendices
64r6. Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson. Inc Company

Lpz 13
Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site. Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site
Year 3 (2010) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos
Taken August 2010
(continued)
PI 15
KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Appendices
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson. Inc Company

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (2010) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX B
GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA
1. Tables 131 -135. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
2. Cross - section Plots and Tables
3. Longitudinal Profile Plots
& ASSOCIATES, P.. C Appendices
a KO Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc. Company

L
C
¢
Q
LL�F
o
o
a
o
0o
z
z
a �
c �
e w C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
¢
z
¢
z
d
z
¢
z
d
z
d
z
d
<I<
E d �°-z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z°
z
z
o
0
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
= iFi C H
z =
_ d
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N¢%.
N
N
F=—
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
C
bD O
ci
N
N
N
d
N
N
Q
Q
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
d
Q
Uj7wp
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
a
C3
s
0
n
bA
to
C
O
U
C
an
�
�'
3
o
a�i
y
O
"•
�
y
•�,
,o
L
•O
c
x
y
U
O
ca
L
'ti
C
S
Vi
•dn
pp
R
1
O
_
G
U
f
O
�
m
.D
C.
CI.
�
C
bA
Cn
v
ti
U
by
U
L
cz
o
E
o
w
V
N
pQ
O
cd
¢
cLC
ti
Q
U
b
a .
0
U
C
L
m
if
L
a�
p.,
CO
CO
r!
G
yC
pq
.-+
i1
by
bA
ca
CC
L
'C
-0
o
°o
o
w
°
_
v
�
°o
�
°
o
0
0
°
°o°
L•
c°—'
C
L
b
L
�
ai
?¢
L+
o
o
C
cC
cC
O
y
.Y
L
n
o
a
ca
D
N
i, ti
Y
E
c
w
aA
3
°�
a
w
to
co
a.)
v'
¢
w
a
v
a
Q
O
O
Q
un
0
U'
d
w
x
Q
w
w
cz
—
N
r7
V Iln
N Im
--
N—
IN
M 17
•-
I N U
IM
7
IN
�a
�s
d
L
o
=
C� L
ee
F" is
Gi
Q
co
U
G
Gzl
:i
V
w

y L
e
L dF
o
0
0
0
0o
d
z
Q
z
� a �
o R C
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
z
z
z
z
L V1 p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
z
a, U
u
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z°
z
z
o
0
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
o w c h
z =
_ d
F;
zz
zzzzzzzz
r
o
o°
o
0
0¢
o
o
d
Q¢
d¢
d¢¢¢
�,w =
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z L _
d
a
p
.�
C
f
3
•
_
C•
E
O
C.
C
•D
cw:
p0
R
R
C13
c•
VJ
�
•y
pU
C
ca
qp
M�
(Y7
O
'O
aJ
•�
y
U
U
.D
OA
U
n
i
L
F
OOA
>
_•
as
o
°o
D
??
o
N
b
Cu
o
ca
U
.G a>
lw
L
°
n
8
0
v
on
c
c
CL
v
c
�0
3
N
c
y
c
0
°�
°�
°
L
3
E
v
o
'
n.
cc
a
b
:
o
a�
o
w°
y
�
v
•v
a�
a�
c
c
o
c.
p
di
U
b>
a
°y
>
a°
,c
cG
ca
•y
p
R=
Q
ti
R
a)
i
p
a)
a.
O
7
a,
7
U
V
U
L
L
O
�
CC
d
R
3
L
E-+ 0.
ci:
d
cm
U
G
czi
rte:
V
Z'

y L
C
Q
� a �
•�
++
o
\
0
\
o
\
e
\
o
\
0
\
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
\
0
\
o
\
e
\
o
\
0
o
0
0
e
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
d
d
d
C
O
z
z
z
�
y U
L d
'c �a
d
d
d
d
Q
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
7 w y
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
O
z
z
O
O
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
C
z =
=
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
DD
00
z
00
00
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
N
C
bD 'O
100
£
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
d
d
c�a
a0
00
00
z
00
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
N
V1 = w C
S z L ►r
d
C64 e
0
cc•.s•
00
bA
�
p
U
4:.
00
R
c=3
y
V1
OA
R
=C
O
'D
i
�
�•
w
H
R
^.
. C
bA
bA
y
U
U
=
O
0.
�•
U
�n
R
U
G'
to
C
'�
—
c
's..,
i
Qn
Q
v
R
w�.
N
O
U
"O
0.
u
C
N
Rp
0.
�O ..
cy
C..
2
ti
'.
O
-
U
_
U
U
Ob
=
to
tz
CC
C�
•=
R
U
N
U
=
O
0.
R
C
N
E
U
R
by
�^
A
f1
i
00
Op
C^
U
O
'C
o_
b
o
o_
La
3
°�
�
o
o�
OD
u
pA
b
.�
tb
0
`
L
'b
0.
a_
w
°'
c°�
c
v
IL)
>
R
a
J
O
t
co
U
O
O
to
=
•�
w
c
3
.LU.
.5...
a.
4
U
c
O C..
R On
v
On
u
Q
o
�y
L
s•"
R
N
L
7
N
�1.
O
Q
7
O
�I•�.
O
Ll.
Q
O
U7
GJ
u
C
U
V
d
L
w
.b°
U
x
C
d
L
w
O
w
w
U
-•
-�
N
M
V
--
N
C� N
C
v
11W
3
C
C7
y
0

d L
=
L
O
Q
z
y F
a
L
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
z
Q
z
a
z
a
z
O
O
w
L v1 p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
a U
C
E _+ m +°
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
z
z
0
O
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z =
y�
F
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z-
_
en •v
L °-
Z E =
Z 2
C7540.=
r-
r-
r-
r-
r--
r-
r-
r-
r,
r-
r-
z
�
�
z
z
z
z
Z
z
2
zL ►.
d
R
0
bA
�.
O
i
E
3
o
0
0
C
c..
•O
R
R
Cam.
y
CIO
R
01)
CQ
U
N
•O
U
C
cS
rn
�'
_C
a
:
y
o
y
fl
C
_a
i
U
OU
�
N
7
b
•�
y
0.
•�
4.
O
R
f+
L
0.
,�
O
C
c.
cn
c
c
a
v
� w
C
�
R
�
U
X
�
�
.--.
�
G.
cUC
�
N
�
a.
•.3
cd
N
'b
'O
F,
a.
�
R
O
j
O
s
U
O
O
=_
eh
=
E
C_
to
•_
on
7D
o
L
O
•y
'-
R
a�
a�
a
0
O
a
7
a�
C
v
a�
C
i
i
O
c..
Q
w
a,
uo
rn
0
u
Q
w
x
d
w
w
w
red
Chi ��I
Qn si
y
L
o
9
R
7
L
�
m
R

y L
C
Q
� y �
.0 C
•�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
e
o
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
Z
Z
z
Z
a U
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
7 C y
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
z
Z
O
O
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
r:
z =
_ d
7
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
z
N
N
^,
Z
Z
z
z
z
z
Z
C
bD 7
y
•C 7
q y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
z
N
N
^,
V1 7 W C
z
Z
z
z
Z
z
z
a �
0
cn
c
=
c
CL
=
-o
C
a�
ca
0
co
coo
�..
q
I
oq
C
�
�
CQ
o
o
.o
�
y
�
00
�•
U
v,
by
CJ
•�
vi
U
w
c
CIO
>
Z
r°
a
o
n
ro
�
°
b
o
^" ^
w
COOS
'C
ro
cz
Q
L
fl'
_
U
u
V1
v
w0
O
3
0.
N
O
o_
O
Ca
U
�,
U
L
3
y
C
-
O
i
O
C� Ci
•�
bA
cC
O
U
U
iG
y0
0.
is
cs
`C
aU.+
�C
bA
0.
.O
bA
tb
c�
aU-•
O
O
O N
Q
c
V>
E5
d
a
CIS
t
b
bA
°A
'
•
�
C :
�,
3
�:
�.
a,
b^n
a�
.'emu
a�
a�
rn
Q
O
d
a
O
60
(j
u
G
N
cn
7
�n
--�
N
cn
N—
N
cn
14 1—
U
lN
lcn
�a
y
i
�
�
o
R
�
�
y
m
y
O
Cq
R
en
d
=
E-� Q1
w
Q
c
U
G
czi
w
C7
z

Pro)ect Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crern
B.- Marsh
Reach 5 - XS I
Riffle
10 /1 /10
Corbin, Smith
21KW
20111
21111
2111:
2L0
2008
11.1
2008
2009
Nidth
2010
As -built Surrey
YR 1 Sauey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
Station
F3evatiost
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
-7.7
141.1
0.0
139.5
0.0
139.3
0.0
139.2
-0.4
139.3
6.5
139.1
4.5
139.1
6.0
139.0
9.0
139.0
9.3
138.7
8.0
138.9
10.5
138.6
14.5
137.0
11.4
1371
9.9
138.6
13.0
137.7
17.3
136.7
13.4
137.2
11.5
138.1
16.0
136.7
24.3
139.2
15.0
136.7
13.6
137.5
17.3
136.7
31.8
139.2
16.0
136.7
15.3
136.9
22.0
138.5
38.9
141.7
17.0
136.7
16.5
136.6
32.5
139.1
19.6
137.7
18.1
137.0
21.3
138.5
19.3
137.5
24.3
139.2
10.6
137.9
32.0
139.2
21.5
138.3
22.9
138.5
25.0
138.9
29.0
139.0
32.5
139.2
143.0
142.0
141.0
_ 140.0
139.0
w
t 138.0
w
°0 137.0
w
w 136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cross - Section R5-1 -Looking Do-stream a; ST.4 I1 +60
Area
21NI8
21KW
20111
21111
2111:
2L0
13.5
11.1
Nidth
17.2
13.7
11.2
%I.. Dcpth
1.2
LO
1.0
Mac Dcpth
2.4
2.0
l.8
W/D
14.2
13.9
11.2
Brown Marsh Reach 5 - XS 1 Riffle
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) --Year 3 (2010)

Section Reach 3 -XS 2
.e Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Smith
2008
21H)s
2006
1 2010
2009
As-Milt Survey
YR1 Survey
YR2
Sareey
Statlw
Hesatlw
St■11M
Bkvvatim
Statioe
Bkvatu
-5.8
140.8
0.0
139.1
0.0
138.9
.0.3
139.1
7.1
138.7
7.0
138.6
12.1
138.6
12.1
138.3
11.3
138.5
17.3
136.3
14.3
137.7
12.5
138.3
21.2
136.2
16.2
136.9
14.0
138.0
26.3
138.2
17.6
136.0
16.0
137.0
37.3
138.9
19.0
133.7
17.9
136.3
44.8
140.7
19.9
135.7
19.3
136.1
22.9
136.8
20.4
136.0
24.6
1379
22.2
136.3
27.2
138.3
23.0
137.0
29.8
138.7
25.4
137.9
37.3
138.9
27.0
138.2
143.0
142.0
141.0
_ 140.0
139.0
'e
w
138.0
o° 137.0
a
u
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
5.0
30.0 138.3
38.1 138.8
2010
YR 3 Survey
Statiw 6kvatiw
0.0 139.0
9.5 138.6
12.5 138.6
14.8 137.3
18.0 136.1
21.0 136.2
25.0 138.0
33.0 138.3
38.0 138.8
Photo of Cross- Section RS-2 - Looking Downstream _X STA 13 +70
Area
21H)s
2009
1 2010
2011
2012
22.2
20.9
13.3
Width
16.2
17.5
I1.3
Mean Depth
1.4
1.2
1.2
I
Man Depth
2.8
2.5
1.9
WD
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 5 - XS 2 Pool
10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) -*-Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Brow. Marsh
Reach 5 - XS 3
Ritno
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Smith
21019
2010
2011
21112
13.6
2008
13.9
2008
2009
12.0
2010
As -built Survey
YRI Survey
YR2Survey
1.1
YR3
Survey
Station
Elevadu
Statba
Eleude.
Stations
82evatias
Station Elevation
-7.3
140.8
0.0
139.0
0.0
139.0
0.0
139.0
-1.0
138.9
3.6
138.7
5.0
138.6
7.5
138.6
11.5
138.7
11.6
138.6
10.0
138.6
12.5
138.5
16.5
136.6
14.9
137.6
12.4
138.5
15.6
137.3
18.6
136.5
16.6
136.8
14.2
138.0
17.7
136.4
24.2
138.7
17.7
136.3
15.9
137.5
18.5
136.4
35.8
138.7
18.6
136.3
17.5
136.5
20.0
136.6
42.9
140.8
20.4
137.0
18.4
136.3
22.0
137.4
22.1
137.7
20.4
136.9
24.5
138.5
24.2
138.6
25.3
138.1
36.5
138.7
31.1
138.7
29.0
138.5
35.5
138.7
36.1
138.6
143.0
142.0
141.0
_ 140.0
139.0
.Q
a
' 138.0
°0 137.0
a
w 136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cross - Section R5J - Looking Downstream ? STA 14+90
Ares
2008
21019
2010
2011
21112
13.6
15,4
13.9
Width
12.0
16.4
12.0
Mean Depth
1.1
0.9
1.2
Ma: Depth
22
2.2
2.1
W/D
10.6
17.6
10.3
Brown Marsh Reach 5 - XS 3 Riffle
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) - ++-Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Cress
B- Marsh
Reach 5 -XS 4
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Smith
2009
2010
2011
MIS
19.1
2008
17.3
2008
2009
13.6
2010
As -0ailt Survey
YR 1 Survey
YR
2 Survey
YR
3 Surrey
Sudan
Elevation
Station
Ekvatku
Station
Vanden
Station Elevation
-7.4
140.2
0.0
138.4
0.0
138.4
0.0
138.4
.0.3
138.5
3.9
138.4
5.0
138.2
5.0
138.2
7.1
138.2
7.4
138.3
7.5
138.1
7.5
138.1
12.5
136.0
9.6
137.4
10.3
137.0
10.0
137.1
14.7
135.6
11.2
136.7
12.4
136.3
12.5
136.3
19.8
138.6
12.8
136.0
13.1
135.8
13.0
136.0
27.2
138.5
13.3
135.5
14.5
135.6
14.5
135.6
33.7
140.4
14.2
135.4
16.0
136.3
15.8
135.7
15.6
135.9
17.3
137.3
20.0
138.3
17.2
137.2
19.4
138.1
27.5
138.5
19.8
138.4
20.6
138.3
27.4
138.5
24.0
138.4
27.5
138.5
143.0
142.0
141.0
_ 140.0
139.0
.e
w
138.0
e 137.0
Z
w
w 136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cross - Section RS4 - Looking Dowmlream .iii STA 17N0
Area
2M
2009
2010
2011
MIS
19.1
15.4
17.3
Width
13.6
11.9
123
Man Depth
1.4
1.3
1.4
Mu Depth
3.0
2.5
2.6
WAD
NA
NA
NA
Brown marsh Reach 5 - XS 4 Pool
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) Year 2 (2009) - »-Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Bmssn Marsh
Reach 4 - XS 5
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin, Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
19.0
2008
15.7
2008
2009
Width
2010
As -built Survey
YR1 Survey
YR2 Survey
YR3Survey
Mean Depth
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
-7.5
140.4
0.0
138.4
25.4
138.4
0.0
1383
-0.6
138.5
6.6
138.0
21.4
138.3
6.0
137.8
5.6
138.0
8.4
137.1
18.5
138.2
9.5
136.6
10.7
135.6
10.4
136.2
17.2
137.6
12.0
135.4
14.0
135.5
11.8
135.5
16.0
136.3
13.0
135.2
18.1
138.4
12.6
134.9
15.1
135.6
14.0
135.2
23.8
138.4
13.4
134.8
14.6
135.3
15.5
136.7
31.3
140.9
14.5
135.1
13.9
135.3
17.8
138.1
15.8
136.2
12.3
135.8
25.0
138.4
16.8
137.4
10.4
136.6
18.1
138.3
8.4
137.2
25.0
138.4
6.6
137.9
3.8
138.0
0.0
138.4
a
t
ffi
e
0
a
W
143.0
142.0
141.0
140.0
139.0
138.0
137.0
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cross - Section R4-X5 - I.uoking Dowmtream ) STA 20+55
Area
2000
2009
2010
2011
2012
19.0
15.1
15.7
Width
11.1
11.2
11.3
Mean Depth
1.7
1.4
1.4
Mes Depth
3.2
2.6
2.6
W/D
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - YS 5 Pool
Banidull Elev.
I
IA 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-M built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -x -Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Brown Marsh
Rcach 4 - XS 6
Riffle
10 /1 110
Corbin, Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
13.9
2008
12.2
2008
2009
Width
2010
As-0ailt Survey
YRI Survey
YR2 Survey
YR3
Survey
Stafiw
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Mention
4.5
140.8
0.0
138.1
0.0
1381
0.0
138.2
0.5
138.3
6.6
137.8
5.0
137.8
7.0
137.7
7.0
137.9
9.0
136.9
6.8
137.8
9.5
136.5
11.5
135.7
10.9
136.1
8.1
137.2
11.5
135.5
13.5
135.7
11.8
135.4
9.5
136.5
12.0
135.4
18.2
137.7
13.4
135A
10.9
135.8
13.0
135.5
23.8
138.0
14.8
136.3
11.5
135.4
16.0
136.9
33.9
140.5
16.5
137.2
12.9
1353
17.5
137.6
18.2
137.9
14.2
136.2
25.0
1382
21.7
138.0
16.5
1371
24.7
1382
18.5
137.7
22.0
137.8
24.8
138.3
Photo of Cross - Section R4-6 - Looking Downstream a, STA 21 +80
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
13.9
13.2
12.2
140.0
Width
11.3
I1.5
10.2
139.0
Mean Depth
1.2
1.1
1.2
13&0
ffi
Mar Depth
2.4
23
2.2
�
136.0
W!D
9.1
10.1
8.5
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - XS 6 Riffle
143.0
--
142.0
141.0
140.0
Z
Banldull Ekv.
139.0
a
r
13&0
ffi
0
137.0
w
W
�
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Year 3( (2010)

Project Name
Cron Section
Rentore
Date
Crew
Brow Marsh
Reach 4 - XS 7
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin, Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.8
2008
20.2
2008
2009
Width
2010
As-bu0t Sorvey
YR 1 Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Ekvatioa
Station
Elevation
Station Elevating
•9.5
140.7
0.0
138.0
28.8
137.9
0.0
137.9
0.4
138.1
3.9
137.7
23.8
137.6
7.5
137.5
7.7
137.7
7.1
137.7
20.4
137.6
12.3
134.8
12.1
134.9
9.2
136.6
18.5
136.9
13.5
134.7
14.9
134.7
11.4
135.6
17.3
136.2
15.0
134.9
20.9
137.5
11.9
135.2
15.8
135.5
18.0
136.4
28.7
137.7
12.2
134.6
15.0
135.1
20.8
137.4
38.8
140.4
13.0
134.5
13.7
134.9
29.0
137.7
14.5
134.4
123
135.0
15.1
135.1
11.1
135.7
15.7
135.6
9.3
136.9
18.3
136.6
7.1
137.7
20.9
137.6
3.8
137.8
28.2
137.6
0.0
138.0
143.0
142.0
141.0
_ 140.0
139.0
a
138.0
0 137.0
a
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cron - Section R4-1- Looking Downstream (rJi STA 22+95
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.8
18.9
20.2
Width
13.6
12.9
13.2
Mena Depth
1.6
1.5
1.5
Max Depth
3.2
2.7
2.7
W/D
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - \S 7 Pool
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) --Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Croee Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Itrmwa Marsh
Reach 4 -XS8
Rifle
10 /1 /10
Corbin, Smith
2009
2010
2ntt
21112
11.2
21918
12.2
20M
_
139.0
2009
11.2
2010
A,-built Survey
YR I Survey
YR
2 Sarver
YR
3 Snrvey
Station
6kvadma
Stadaa
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Rk adma
-11.0
140.3
0.0
137.4
-2.2
137.6
0.0
137.7
.2.1
137.6
4.6
137.4
2.8
137.3
5.0
137.3
5.2
137.5
7.8
136.6
4.4
137.3
6.0
137.0
9.6
135.4
8.8
135.7
5.9
137.0
8.0
136.0
11.3
135.4
9.8
135.2
7.8
136.2
10.0
135.2
16.3
137.6
10.9
135.2
9.2
135.5
10.5
135.1
22.1
137.6
11.7
135.9
9.9
135.1
11.0
135.1
30.9
140.5
14.5
137.1
11.0
135.1
15.5
137.3
16.7
137.6
12.2
133.8
22.5
137.9
22.6
137.8
13.5
136.4
14.8
137.0
16.7
137.4
20.8
137.5
22.6
137.8
Phan of Cross -Section R4-8 - Looking Downstream e; STA 25 +80
Area
2008
2009
2010
2ntt
21112
11.2
12.3
12.2
_
139.0
Width
11.2
12.0
I0.5
138.0
ffi
Mean Deptb
1.0
1.0
1.2
137.0
w
W 136.0
Ma: Depth
2.2
2.2
2.2
WID
1163
11.7
9.0
134.0
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - XS 8 Riffle
143.0
- - - - -- - -- - - - -- -
142.0
- - -
141.0
140.0
_
139.0
Bankfnll Elev.
w
138.0
ffi
°0
137.0
w
W 136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Featorc
Date
Crew
Brown Marsh
Reach 3 -XS 9
Riffle
10 /l /10
Corbin. Smith
22019
20111
21111
21112
14.8
2008
13.3
2008
2009
12.3
2010
As-hda Survey
YR I Survey
YR
2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
Stadium
Elevation
Statme
Elevation
Statlw
Ekvatiom
Statiom Elvvadiou
.9.1
139.3
0.0
136.0
5.0
135.7
0.0
136.1
.0.2
136.4
5.6
136.0
7.4
135.6
7.0
135.7
7.2
136.0
8.7
135.0
9.5
134.8
11.5
133.7
11.9
133.7
10.6
134.5
11.0
134.1
13.0
133.4
13.7
133.8
12.1
133.5
11.8
133.7
15.0
134.1
18.6
135.9
14.0
133.7
12.6
133.5
19.0
135.5
25.1
136.1
15.4
134.1
14.0
133.5
25.5
135.8
36.5
139.7
18.6
135.8
15.5
134.2
22.3
135.8
17.2
135.0
25.0
135.9
19.0
135.6
22.5
135.6
25.7
135.9
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
a
136.0
135.0
0 134.0
v
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0
Photo of CroesSection 113-9 - Looking Downstream o; STA 41 +25
Area
21NI8
22019
20111
21111
21112
14.8
13.1
13.3
Width
12.3
11.6
11.7
Men Depth
1.2
1.1
1
1.1
1
Mar Depth
2.3
2.1
2.1
W/D
10.2
102
10.4
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 9 Riffle
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) ° Year 2 (2009) -Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Crow Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Br-n Marsh
Reach 3 - XS 10
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
20.3
2068
18.2
2008
2009
14.6
2010
As -ba0t Sarver
YR 1 Sarver
YR
2 Sarver
YR
3 Sarver
Station
Elevation
Station
Eevstiou
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
4.0
139.3
0.0
136.1
5.0
135.5
0.0
135A
2.4
136.5
4.5
135.9
8.2
135.3
8.0
135.4
9.6
136.0
8.5
133.4
9.3
1341
13.0
133.0
13.6
133.3
10.6
134.4
11.4
133.7
14.5
132.7
15.2
132.4
11.6
134.0
13.4
132.7
15.5
132.8
16.9
133.5
12.6
133.6
14.3
132.5
20.0
135.5
21.6
135.8
14.0
132.9
15.7
133.0
27.0
133.8
29.5
136.3
14.4
132.5
17.9
134.3
37.7
139.0
14.8
132.1
19.3
135.2
16.2
132.9
20.4
135.4
17.3
134.2
24.0
135.6
19.3
133.2
26.9
136.1
21.8
135.9
25.1
135.9
26.7
136.4
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
e
w
135.0
v
134.0
a
'w 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Photo of Cross - Section R3-10 - Looking Dowastream Iaj STA 42 +30
Arc.
zoos
2009
2010
2011
2012
20.3
17.4
18.2
N idlh
14.6
11.7
IL8
Mean Depth
1.4
1.5
1.5
Mss Depth
3.6
2.8
2.7
W/D
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 10 Pool
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Year 3 (2010)

:t Name Brown Marsh
Section Reach 3 - XS I I
re RAlle
10 /1 /10
2008
2000
2008
As-built Survey
YR I Survey
Station
Elevation
Sutioe
Eleyatb
-8.7
139.0
0.0
135.8
-0.3
136.1
6.5
135.4
8.5
135.5
9.6
134.5
13.0
133.4
11.8
133.2
14.5
133.5
12.6
132.9
18.9
135.5
13.1
132.9
27.1
136.4
14.0
132.9
33.7
138.8
17.7
134.8
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
a
135.0
134.0
iu
al 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0
19.5 135.6
27.1 136.2
2009
YR 2 Saney
Station Elevad,
0.0 135.9
5.0 135.5
7.8 135.3
9.0 134.9
103 134.3
11.6 133.8
12.5 133.5
13.0 133.3
14.1 133.6
15.9 134.3
17.0 134.8
18.2 135.3
19.5 135.6
23.0 135.7
27.0 136.2
2010
YR 3 Survey
Station Elevation
0.0 135.8
8.0 135.4
12.5 133.6
13.5 133.3
14.5 133.6
20.0 135.6
27.0 136.2
3
Photo of Cross Section R3-11 - Looking Downstream ,g, STA 43 +75
Area
2000
2009
2010
2011
2012
16.4
11.1
12.7
Width
12.6
10.4
11.6
Mean Depth
1.3
1.1
1.1
Ma: Depth
2.5
2.1
2.1
W/D
9.7
9.8
10.6
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 11 Riffle
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Bmssn Mmsh
Reach 3 - XS 12
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Smith
21819
2010
2011
2012
18.6
2008
13.7
2088
2009
Width
2010
As -built Survey
YR 1 Sarver
YR 2 Surrey
YR
3 Suncy
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
-8.8
138.1
0.0
136.0
0.0
136.0
0.0
135.9
-8.7
138.1
4.4
135.7
6.0
135.6
9.0
135A
-2.0
135.9
7.9
135.5
8.7
135.5
12.0
134.3
8.2
135.6
11.8
133.8
9.9
135.1
14.5
1332
12.3
133.1
13.1
133.3
11.6
134.5
16.0
133.1
14.7
133.2
13.7
132.6
13.0
134.0
16.5
133.2
19.9
135.6
15.0
132.6
14.5
133.2
20.0
135.4
28.1
136.0
13.9
132.8
15.6
133.0
30.5
136.0
35.5
138.6
16.7
133.5
16.4
133.3
19.9
135.5
17.9
134.2
25.6
135.6
19.3
133.2
30.0
135.7
21.0
135.5
24.0
135.5
30.4
135.9
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
w
' 135.0
ffi
$ 134.0
w
w 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
lIffl
�M
Photo of Crass - Section R3-12- Looking Do%nstream d STA 45+IK
Area
21NIA
21819
2010
2011
2012
18.6
10.5
13.7
Width
12.0
9.3
10.8
Mean Depth
1.6
1.1
1.3
Max Depth
2.9
2.1
2.2
W/D
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 12 Pool
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Crow Section
Feature
Dote
Crew
Bro- Mash
Reach 2. XS 13
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Smith
21N19
2010
21111
21112
213
2008
2L6
2008
21X19
12.9
2010
As-built Survey
YR I Survey
YR 2 Snner
YR
3 Satwey
Staties
Ekrati m
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Stwioa Elevwion
•10.5
138.7
0.0
135.6
0.0
135.5
0.0
135.5
.0.7
135.7
6.7
135.6
5.0
135.2
7.0
135.3
6.7
135.5
9.8
133.7
6.7
135.2
13.0
132.3
10.9
133.1
11.8
132.7
8.0
134.7
14.5
132.2
12.9
132.4
12.2
132.2
9.2
133.9
20.0
135.3
14.7
132.9
13.4
132.2
10.3
133.3
26.0
135.6
18.1
135.3
14.2
132.2
11.7
132.7
25.4
135.7
15.6
132.9
12.4
132.4
33.2
138.5
16.3
133.7
13.6
132.2
18.4
135.0
14.7
132.3
20.4
135.4
16.3
133.7
26.1
135.6
18.0
134.7
19.3
133.2
22.0
135.1
26.0
135.6
Photo of Cross - Section 112 -13 - Looking Downstream a. STA 47 +45
Area
21N18
21N19
2010
21111
21112
213
20.1
2L6
Nidth
12.9
12.5
13.0
136.0
L
Mean Depth
1.7
1.6
1.7
e
Mas Depth
3.1
3.0
3.0
w 133.0
W/D
NA
NA
NA
131.0
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 13 Pool
140.0
- - - - - --
139.0
-
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
L
w
135.0
w
e
134.0
a
w 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey -2010 Survey

Project Name
Crou Swiou
Feature
now
Crew
8mon Mwsh
Reach 2 - XS 14
Rine
luilli0
Corbim Smith
2009
2010
2011
' -012
14.1
2008
2000
2001
10.9
2610
Asiaik S-ey
YR 1
surve7
YA 2 Survey
Yst
3 Sane?
Station
14"atiou
station
Rkvatlaa
Station
Zk%sd n
Station
12evatbs
-9.2
138.5
0.0
135.6
0.0
135.6
0.0
135.7
.0.8
133.5
5.7
135.3
5.0
133.4
6.0
135.3
6.7
135.2
7.6
134.6
6.2
133.3
10.3
1332
10.9
133.0
10.0
133.2
73
134.7
12.0
133.1
12.7
133.1
10.7
133.0
8.8
133.9
17.0
135.3
17.0
133.4
12.2
133.0
10.0
133.5
23.5
135.7
22.9
135.6
14.6
134.3
10.6
133.0
34.8
139.0
17.0
135.5
11.2
133.0
23.7
135.5
12.2
133.1
23.7
135.4
12.6
133.3
13.5
133.8
15.0
134.6
17.1
135.3
20.0
135.3
24.0
135.8
Photo or Croat- Section R2 -14 - Looking Downstmam la STA 47 +48
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
' -012
14.1
12.8
138.0
Width
10.9
10.9
137.0
�p
(app -)
Mean Depth
1.3
1.2
L2.2
136.0
'e
a
Max Depth
2.1
2.3
135.0
WID
8.4
9.2
a 134.0
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 14 Riffle
140.0 - - -- - - - - -
139.0
138.0
137.0
�p
(app -)
F
136.0
'e
a
135.0
a 134.0
a
W133.0
-
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey -2010 Survey

Project Name
Croft Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Bmwn Marsh
Reach 2 -XS 15
Pool
10/1/10
Corbin. Smith
2009
2010
2u11
201z
20.0
2108
19 u
2008
20119
Width
2010
At built Survey
YR 1 Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
-13.6
139.2
0.0
135.3
-0.8
135.5
0.0
1353
.1.4
135.2
4.8
135.3
4.2
135.3
7.0
135.0
5.4
135.1
6.5
134.9
6.0
135.1
10.0
132.4
8.1
132.7
7.6
133.7
7.7
134.0
12.5
132.3
103
131.7
8.7
132.8
8.4
133.3
14.0
132.6
12.1
132.6
9.6
132.3
91
132.4
18.0
135.0
16.7
135.0
10.2
131.7
11.0
131.8
26.5
135.4
25.4
135.4
11.2
131.9
13.0
132.5
33.7
138.8
12.8
132.3
13.8
133.4
14.5
133.6
15.2
134.2
16.7
135.1
16.2
134.6
25.9
135.6
17.4
135.1
21.2
135.1
25.9
135.6
140.0
139.0
13 &0
_ 137.0
fr
z 136.0
w
135.0
W
134.0
a
PQ 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Photo of Cross-Section 112-15 - Looking Downstream 3 STA 50+75
.Area
2008
2009
2010
2u11
201z
20.0
20.I
19 u
Width
10.9
11.4
11.11
Mean Depth
1.8
1.8
1.7
Ms. Depth
3.3
3.4
2 7
W/D
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 15 Pool
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey - x-2010 Survey

Project Name
Cron Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Bmwn Marsh
Reach 2 - XS 16
Ildne
10 /l /10
Corbin, Smith
2009
1 2010
2011
2012
14.4
2008
2008
2009
10.8
2010
As -built Suney
YR 1
Survey
YR2
Survey
YR
3 Sunny
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
-12.3
1384
0.0
135.3
0.0
1352
0.0
1351
-1.1
135.1
6.9
135.1
5.0
135.0
7.0
135.0
7.0
135.0
8.1
134.8
7.3
135.0
12.0
132.7
11.6
132.8
9.9
133.9
8.7
134.3
13.0
132.7
13.4
132.7
11.1
133.1
10.5
133.5
19.0
134.9
18.1
135.1
11.9
132.8
11.7
132.6
26.0
135.1
25.4
135.3
12.5
132.7
12.7
132.5
34.6
139.0
14.2
132.7
13.5
132.8
14.8
133.2
15.7
133.8
16.1
133.8
17.0
134.6
19.2
135.0
19.5
134.9
19.9
135.1
26.3
135.1
26.8
135.1
F---
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
L
W
135.0
d
� 134.0
W
w 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Phuto of Cmss- Section 82-16- LooltiNg Downstream a. STA 52+02
Area
2008
2009
1 2010
2011
2012
14.4
13.9
Width
10.8
12.0
Memo Depth
1.3
12
L14.5
M.. Depth
2.3
2.4
W/D
9.1
I0.4
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 16 Riffle
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey - ■-2010 Survey

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Broscn Marsh
Reach I - XS 17
Riffle
If) /I /I(t
Corbin. Smith
1 2009
1 2010
2011
1 2012
4.7
2008
6.2
-
2000
2009
2010
As -built Survey
9.8
YR
I Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR 3 Sarver
Station
Elevation
Station Eevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
-6.9
138.2
26.1
135.6
26.5
135.7
26.0
135.6
-1.2
136.1
17.9
135.6
21.5
135.7
18.0
135.7
8.4
135.7
15.5
135.4
16.5
135.7
12.5
134.6
113
134.4
14.2
135.2
14.8
135.4
11.5
134.4
12.3
134.3
12.9
134.5
13.5
134.8
8.0
135.7
15.3
135.4
12.4
134.3
12.4
134.5
0.0
136.1
15.5
135A
11.4
134.4
11.7
134.4
31.9
135.4
10.7
134.8
10.7
134.9
405
1372
9.5
135.4
9.5
135.4
8.4
135.7
8.6
1351
2.7
135.7
4.5
135.7
0.0
136.1
0.0
136.1
C
Photo of Cross - Section RI.17 - Looking Downstream Q STA 13+60
Area
2008
1 2009
1 2010
2011
1 2012
4.7
4.9
6.2
-
_
Width
8.8
7.8
9.8
a
Mean Depth
0.5
1
0.6
1
0.6
1
134.0
Max Depth
1.3
1.3
1.2
133.0
W/D
16.2
12.6
15.5
Brown Marsh Reach 1 - XS 17 Riffle
ayV.V
139.0
138.0
Bankfull Elev.
137.0
-
_
a
136.0
a
a
135.0
w
134.0
a
Y
w
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) - *-Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Brown Marsh
Reach I -XS 18
Pool
l0 /1/10
Corbin, Smith
1009
2010
2011
2012
7 7
2008
Z8
2008
137.0
2009
7.0
2010
As -built Survey
YR 1 Survey
YR
2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Ekvatien
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
-6.7
135.9
0.0
135.9
0.0
135.9
0.0
136.0
142
135.9
9.2
135.8
6.0
135.8
13.0
136.0
17.0
1342
12.4
136.0
13.8
135.9
17.0
134.5
18.7
133.9
14.2
135.8
15.0
135.4
18.0
134.4
18.8
133.9
15.7
135.1
15.9
135.0
19.0
134.6
28.4
135.9
16.5
134.6
IZI
134.5
22.0
136.0
34.3
138.4
17.3
133.9
17.9
134.3
28.3
1362
18.4
133.7
19.0
134.5
18.8
134.0
20.8
135.6
19.3
134.4
22.0
135.9
20.8
135.6
26.0
135.8
21.6
135.9
28.9
136.1
26.1
135.8
28.5
136.1
Photo of Cross - Section RI -I8 - Looking Downstream a STA 12 +45
Area
2008
1009
2010
2011
2012
7 7
6.9
Z8
Baullfull Elev.
/(.Pp..)
137.0
Width
7.0
8.2
8.8
L
Mean Depth
1.1
0.8
I
0.9
I
Max Depth
2.1
1.6
1.6
W/D
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 1 - XS 18 Pool
140.0
139.0
i
138.0
Baullfull Elev.
/(.Pp..)
137.0
_
L` 136.0
L
R
135.0
w
134.0
a
Y
w
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
Distance (feet)
-As bait Survey -Year 1(2008) Survey -Year 2 (2009) --Year 3 (2010)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Brown Marsh
Reach 1 - XS 19
Riffle
10/1/10
Corbin. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
43
2008
3.8
2008
2009
2010
As -built Survey
7.2
Y'R I Survey
/(B pp-x.)
YR
2 Survey
YR 3
Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
-4.6
137.9
0.0
136.6
0.0
136.6
0.0
136.5
-0.5
136.2
2.6
136.1
60
136.2
7.0
136.3
7.7
136.0
7.4
136.2
7.6
136.2
10.0
1353
10.0
134.9
8.6
135.7
8.4
136.0
12.0
135.1
11.4
134.9
9.5
135.6
9.2
135.8
15.0
136.0
14.6
136.3
10.3
135.0
10.0
135.4
23.0
136.1
20.5
136.3
11.4
134.9
10.7
135.1
29.8
139.6
12.8
135.1
11.4
135.1
13.5
135.4
12.5
135.2
14.7
136.0
13.3
135.5
15.9
136.0
14.0
135.9
19.9
136.0
15.3
136.1
22.3
136.1
18.0
136.1
22.4
136.1
Photo of Cross- Section RI -19 - Looking Downstream * STA 10+72
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
43
3.8
3.8
138.0
Width
6.7
7.2
7.2
/(B pp-x.)
Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
1
0.5
1
Ma: Depth
1.1
1.0
0.9
N' /D
104
136
13.7
135.0
Brown Marsh Reach 1 - XS 19 Riffle
140.0 -- - - - - - -- -- __
139.0
138.0
Bankfull Elev.
j
/(B pp-x.)
_ 137.0
136.0
135.0
4
O
F 134.0
w
-
Y
c� 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance feet
-As built Survey -Pearl (2008) -Year2 (2009) -Year3 (2010)

Project Nnae
Crvn S.ctim
Futon
Dri
Crow
B- Minh
Reach 1- XS 20
Pool
10 /1 /10
Corbin. Bmrth
2009
2010
2011
2012
61
2008
6.4
2008
Width
2009
6.9
2010
A.4tt0t Survey
YR
1 S-y
YR
2 Swr y
YR
3 Survey
Staaot
11"nuat
Statbt
alnaast
Bullet
Slnmdm
Stukw mmad-
4.5
139.2
0.0
1361
0.0
136.2
OL
1363
.0.7
1365
2.7
136.2
5.0
136.1
9.0
136.2
8.8
136.4
8.2
136.5
8.4
136.2
12.5
134.8
11.4
134.9
9.3
136.3
9.5
136.1
13.5
134.6
13.6
134.9
10.0
135.9
11.0
135.5
14.0
134.8
15.9
136.3
111
135.2
12.2
134.9
17.0
136.1
23.6
136.5
12.4
134.4
12.9
1343
24.0
136.4
28.5
138.2
13.6
134.2
13.6
134.5
14.6
135.3
14.4
134.7
15.9
136.2
15.5
135.7
16.7
136.2
16.6
136.0
22.3
1363
17.0
136.0
23.7
136.5
20.0
136.0
254
1364
Photo of Cm - Secllon RI -10 - Looking Dowortream -i. STA 10+52
Arcs
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
61
5.4
6.4
Bankf dl Elev.
Width
6.2
6.9
7.8
. 137.0
Mean Depth
1.0
0.8
0.8
Max Depth
1.9
1.5
1.5
W/D
NA
NA
95
a
z 134.0
Brown Marsh Reach I - XS 20 Pool
140.0
139.0
138.0
Bankf dl Elev.
(app -)
. 137.0
136.0
w
135.0
� I
a
z 134.0
a
w
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Y.,,3(2010:):]

k
--
k
�
_ §
«
3
�
�
§ §
.
�
�
K
/
!
(
�
�
� |
■& ■ &;&
k
|
�
ƒ
■�
|HIM -k
;
`
■� _
.
■ 15® «! -2!
!! =a!£ ==
■2
0
V"
V"
V"
�.
2
2
2
#aa UO|s■
nla

O
0

)§
\
. � - - - -
�
-- -
- -- -
-�
�
k
�
■ i
� $
v i
■
.
�
i
§
$
�
e
t
as t
=
t �
°�
a
frl•Ik
,
�R�z ,
7
�
$ �
�
� Q
nk § §k §)k
� ■E;..,..■
�
.
� - / //\ ■
�
�
�; ;; ;�_ ■■
�
■ ; ;; ; ;a ;,
J; )
)!)),\
°
1 ;4 =l ; ■■■
�`
■�
tn
q q
2
m
N
2
fn
)}!.
iIH
lE�q`���
( ■a
u�
n�
/!!!f
)§

rz�<z.z
� 6 ci
mom
<Eo�o.i
n'sas��gso
rv� X0008000
y ry ry ry n n ry
y n n n ry n ry
O
O
N
O
O
N
w
�
O
O r/j
p
N O
a
U
O
N
(
.9
o
z
�
o �
r
Y
V
�
� O
m
v
7�
O
O �
Nvi
I
0
N
O
M M M M M
(1333) UOIIUA3I:l

■& ;&|&
■&;& ;&
■) ;§!2
)
! ||!!!
■!
§; a -- - --
r
- -- ■7 / -e - - - - - - - --
|}
!q!!, ■q = ; =:
E |eela@ §w@ @i
.
�
.
�
—
2
k
§ .
�
/
/
&
5
3
�
�|
�
Q
e
E■�
/
�
§
k
�
�
$ �
2 &
k
�
\
k
(! §)2m@A31 3

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX C
HYDROLOGY DATA
2010 Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Figure C 1. Annual Climactic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
I RAF KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Appendices
k4r Consulting Engineers
A Florence 6 Hutcheson, Inc. Company

T-
4)
ev
L
4)
c ea
Oo
L
C7 0
Q
E M
34)
t
L
eo
L
O
W
(sayaui) uoi;e;idioaJd
Ln Lo
M M N N r r O O
277
— — — — — — — — — — —
O
U)
R
ai
U)
rn
o
E o
> -o
O c
z
owl
�p
a
a
N
� a
c
0
cn
c
�3
0
v (�
�w
O
C� f,mon w
G
N 9
0W0'.t Now 0"T NON IT0 ?0N-, owON q-0 WON vWW0
C%4 rrrrrNNNNC MC?C?CMP')MIT
(sayaui) lana-1 JaJEM
OIOZ/01/1 L
0107./£ /L L
O L OZ /LZ /01
O L MOZ/O L
O L OZ/£ 1/01
O LOZ/9/01
O LOZ /6Z/6
O L OZ /ZZ /6
O LOZ /9 L/6
O LOZ/8/6
OIOZ/1 /6
O LOZ /9Z/8
O LOZ /81/8
OIOZ/11/8
O L OZ /b /8
O LOZ /8Z /L
O L OZ/ L Z/L
OLOZ /171 /L
0 L OZ /L /L
O lOZ/0£ /9
O LOZ /£Z /9
O oz/%/9
O LOZ/6/9
O LOZ /Z /9
O LOZ /9Z /5
OIOZ/61 /9
O L OZ /Z L/5
O 1 OZ/9/9
O L OZ /8Z /b
O 1 OZ/ 1 Z/b
O 1OZ/1 1/b
O LOZ /L /b
O LOZ/ 1 £/£
0 LOZ /tiZ /£
O LML 1/£
O LOZ/O 1/£

N
d
Im
7
L
y2+
7
c �
Oo
L r
� N
a
E M
Co L
3 4)
t
L
ca
C
O
ML
W
(sayaui) uoi;e;idioaJd
U� Lo Ln
co M N N O O
O LOZ/O6/6 6
------------- - - - - -- 060Z/£/66
0 60Z/MU
0 O 60Z /OZ /0 6
a�
O lOZ/£ 6/0 6
U) MOM/0 6
a�
v 3 UOZ /6Z/6
MOZ /ZZ /6
c O lOZ/5 6/6
o c 0 WUR /6
z
OLOZ/6/6
0 60Z /9Z/8
0lOURM
0 602/ 6 OR
0 60Z /tl/8
0 60Z/8Z /L
0 60Z/ 6Z /L
MOZIKIL
R
o�
060Z /L/L
0 60Z/0£ /9
0 60Z/£Z /9
0 60Z/9 6/9
v
0 60Z/6/9
0 60Z /Z /9
0 60Z /9Z /9
�9
0 60Z/6 6/5
0 0 60Z/Z 6/5
0 60Z/9/5
cn
0 60Z /8Z /b
c
3 0 60Z/ 6 Z/b
0
0 0 60Z /b 6 /t,
r c 0 60Z /L/tb
�9 060Z/6£ /£
cn
0 60Z /bZ /£
- -- - - - -- - - - - -- 060Z /LL /£
0 60Z /O 6/£
OoOCO�N0ww'TN0N 'TCOgT0N,t0w0N g0w0N tcow0
N����� ' "... C� NNNCVMMCMC?C?
(sayaui) Iana-1 aaIeM

4)
ea
C7
v
c
L
W
Nd
IL
4�
ca ea
V 0
�o
� N
O
L M
0,
CL
E}
3
N
s
c�
C
3
O
m
(sayaui) uoi;e;idioaJd
U� U� Lo
M M N N
LO
O O
MOZ/OL/L L
-- — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — MOZ/E/LL
O L OZ /LZ /O L
0
0 LOZ/OZ/0 L
m
0 LOVE L/0 L
N 0 LOZ /9/0 L
a�
a 3 OLOZ /6Z/6
OLOZ /ZZ /6
m c OLOZ /5L /6
o c 0 L OZ/9/6
z
OLOZ/L /6
0 L OZ /5Z /9
0 L OZ/9 L/9
0 L OZ/ L L/9
0 LOZ /b /9
0 LOZ /9Z /L
0 LOZ/ L Z/L
O L OZ /b L/L
R
0 LOZ /L /L
0 LOZ/0£ /9
0 LOZ/EZ /9
0 LOZ /9 L/9
0 LOZ /6/9
0 LOZ /Z /9
0 LOZ /9Z /5
0 LOZ /6 L/9
0 0 LOZ /Z L/5
N
0 LOZ /5/9
co
0 LOZ /9Z /t7
G
3 0LOZ /LZ /t7
OLOZ /bL /b
9
s o 0 L OZ /L /V
o OLOZ/LE /E
* 0 L OZ /bZ /£
91 0 LOZ /L L/E
0 LOZ/0 L/E
000C 0�' NOOOC O�NON� COa0ON�0000ON�COODON�CDO0ON�
NN(VNNMCMMCMCM���
(sa(4aui) lana-I aa;eM

m
r
D
u
�L
O
2
N
O
M
W;
m
R
0
u
'a+
ev
E
U
io
3
C
C
Q
!'I
v
L
3
U.
0
14
M oo r� Lo Ln v m
(say:)ui) uoilelidi38Jd
N ei O
oad
AoN
100
X
L
s
ida5
X
8ny s
m
Apf II
0
0
0
N
aunt
rn
g
AeW
M
000
O
Ay
jeIN
qaj
uer

0
N
0
Z (6
(6 N
16-
f6
O �
N O
L m O
Lp J N
a o
Z Q 4)
C CO C
O 2
-0 �
E
J * r
i
O 0) 00 h
LD Ln m N r-I O
(say:)ui) uogejidi:)aad
Sad
AON
LtX
3das
O
n
L
8ny 6
m
I
Alnr
O
O
N
aunt
Nr4
�
Aeyy
00
0
1dy
ieyy
qaj
uer
V C
4. �F
Ln Q o
[.Q U
� c
H 0
r ` N
O L
c _
u
C
v
O `
0
LL
Q
7
0000
M
4�
N
'IT
-
r-
000
O Z
z�
L
C
V)
N
M
O
u)
M
r--
O
00
O
M
G
yj
J
'
11 f
4a
f
N
L1:
it
r
�
r
LO
U
0�
is
C
a
=
-�
ri
r
t.7
O
L
c�
G
3
LO
r
LL
MML
O
0
N
0
Z (6
(6 N
16-
f6
O �
N O
L m O
Lp J N
a o
Z Q 4)
C CO C
O 2
-0 �
E
J * r
i
O 0) 00 h
LD Ln m N r-I O
(say:)ui) uogejidi:)aad
Sad
AON
LtX
3das
O
n
L
8ny 6
m
I
Alnr
O
O
N
aunt
Nr4
�
Aeyy
00
0
1dy
ieyy
qaj
uer
V C
4. �F
Ln Q o
[.Q U
� c
H 0
r ` N
O L
c _
u
C
v
O `
0
LL
Q
7
0000
M
O
N
'IT
-
r-
000
Iq
N
N
M
O
u)
M
r--
O
00
O
N
0)
M
M
r
LO
�
0�
VM'
-�
'T
O
O
N-
LO
V'
IT
O
-I-
04
*
Cl)
LO
N
u7
V
LO
M
00
(D
V
M
CO.
co
O
E
O
IT
[t
In
O
IT
N
L *
00
(D
00
In
O
O
M
OP °
O
O
V
r-
M
(D
(D
N
Q)
Lo
.4
Lo
co
V
Lo
(D
M
Ln
co
(h
r
(D
Co
14,
rl-
r--
r-
rn
r—
o
O
N
N
N
O)
n
Cl)
(D
M
M
N
M
M
M
N
�
0
�iQCn0Z0
LL2Q�
—
0
N
0
Z (6
(6 N
16-
f6
O �
N O
L m O
Lp J N
a o
Z Q 4)
C CO C
O 2
-0 �
E
J * r
i
O 0) 00 h
LD Ln m N r-I O
(say:)ui) uogejidi:)aad
Sad
AON
LtX
3das
O
n
L
8ny 6
m
I
Alnr
O
O
N
aunt
Nr4
�
Aeyy
00
0
1dy
ieyy
qaj
uer
V C
4. �F
Ln Q o
[.Q U
� c
H 0
r ` N
O L
c _
u
C
v
O `
0
LL
Q
7

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 3 (20 10) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX D
MONITORING PLAN VIEWS
05 KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Appendices
Consulting Engineers
A Florence & Hutcheson, Inc Company

U
a
�OS�� •
[r Etl
J
Z
O
to
m S
Z
LL
O
Ui�
N
3
O iA OOC
m
� �
s
r
/
a
dy
-
�!
CL
W q
I
in
O
_
L!
z
LU
O
\\\
co
LU
CO) +
�I
1,
�I
i,
I,
Ii
II
II
1,
I,
I
I
II
II
M
�
'
II
I
x +
y
I i
II
II
II
II
II
13
I
II
II
I
II
�I
�I
I
,
I
�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
avav <�raa NC_._-
u6P�1'W'6u�.vy�uau- fiNB\BBd2 A\ u' BDDZ \�

Z � O
t- • i m
� � N
dt � c 0O O
oc
V °O
Z = C
hI
` \ N
�j II V
I /
\\ Z
ode t
zv
a u
W
` 0 /
mN `` \ `1•
06 y
0. o
WM z
Z O N O
R I'i ;( i z� '0
W
O
O \ a io
z
Z
�- p 06 < o
u -
}
FOF 1\I i �
11 au
M
mj
OA/
\
\ \ \\
c z \ \\
W = V
WO
�a•2- wa- s„�.n�,awswe�eesz I'�•A \s,.�o,s.oy� y
BOOZ /S/II

V
Z
ad
O
Z
O
Qr
}
5
U
.Q/ 1
IA
0 3W \ } 1 1
II
I
/
\I
W
\
Z
\
\
1
1 1
1 1 I
1 % 1
00+ gl
�O
1
I
I
I 1
l
I 0 00+6/'o4S
z
Fj N
W (� I•
I I /
Z^
d
W W
Z m N = 0 oc
W
H O
00
'
0
Z o
(� p
LLJ
9
LL
7
V
N
Z
0
G
N
N
v
'o4S
11
1
I
,I
i 004-HT4S
w
H
OC
V
00+0/'o4S

Z
0
lo� 05 +69 SN01PI1�5'9�M1 °C W
\ \
n
\\
00+60•D�S
1
OOfBZ'D!♦S
LU
II
W
W / 1
00+fo •DlS
� � f
Z <
W
I 1 \
00+ -67 •DJS
\ I w
,
t �o W W
ZN
3
l9 1 ; ❑ •

g9 0 a m O
c
yy O W
\� - - - - -- 1 00+,�f"o4S
I
ul 11 I
w zm
I, II 9
1
00+9f 'o4S \ \ \
S2
)/ I v u
z
W —
/ I 1
Z \y
Z 00 +k,i'o4S \� \
z
ce
O
� F
0 \\ \
m 00+F£"o�S
/--------------
/
00 +ZZ"o�S
/
m
\ \ 00+1s'D�S
o
00+0.o4S
2
w
w
6 / I/ u5P'S- pd- 6uima�uourSNB�BOBZ •A\ ` BOOZ /S

y 9 n Z m
� gY�
W
y i — -` Z^
N / /
co
m� W
� I I I
W
O `
W
o(V
U I
/ 1
/ - - ---- - -- /
- / V
s 004 -ffk •o�sW I 1 ` `"
a �\ Z
I I i l
Z F a
re / ; / / Ro Z
Z O I / 00+Zf -'o4S W
O
LIJ
I � o
O �
ie 1; ;
I / /
V i %II \ \
$ I I i I
* I 1 1 F
�U
vo
a
`+OP9'wd'W�+neuou- BMH�BBBZ A\ � BOOZ

0 9 h Z eo
co
vi O
q�' l W N
co
LU A
QE]
LUo
Z Z " � 00+bS'o4S
lW O 1—
7 Z N W
p Z OC y
y3$Fd 1 1
1 /
X cc
(I N \ \ OO+ZS'o4S Z
1 1 1 I I
Z �
1
00+197D>S
1 N W
It \
uj
I 1 \ \
.�
W
r \
1 00+60'o�S
ell I
1
It
W
11 ji Z
it ' 11 11
0 ,9p *D�S \
I I
alx P i
li - 0/yY�� W
� ►jP
eei...i �(wa- 6uumNO.-SNB \BBBi A�
moZ

o
a �a N Z m
m S °
m
LL
cWg� J ao aH oOc �
�E 5 w
age o N O z w
Cr j 5 Z N m
a W o
Z O Q
\ O
Y
LU
m
O W 7S b
V �
Z % I/
ce fh Y I I
W co d \�
co 004-9VD4S
�n to
3-
Z o
W
N M \
;l
W OO +PI'o4S ---------
z It
0
LL `
1
0
O a W W
m
�/
_ JJ /
/
/
i
/
/
D OO +EI *DDS u
II o
eZC O a I I\ E a
W i FZ
O =
O
O U
O i / I U ° O
N /
Z W
2 a � I� < 00 +II 'o4S T N �� c
W � 1 1 o
(O�
�El 1
/, %I. o •
W / Z
/ r m ui r
II I' Z I Z G
3 y m
LL i
a Y U g