20071212 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20111115

6 9- 1/�V'
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 4 (2011) ANNUAL MONITORING
BROWN MARSH SWAMP STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION SITE
Robeson County, North Carolina
Hydrologic Unit 03 04020403 70 10 of the Lumber River Basin
Contract No. 16- DO6038
Prepared for: RECEIVED
NOV 1 5 2011
-, r�' SRem} NC ECOSYSTEM
a CiC�iTI�IIt ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
vaa4aam
NCDENR- Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Boulevard, Suite 1 H 103
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
November 2011

Prepared by:
o-re nc- - e*&-H tcheso %
............ ......
............
C---:O, T-ti-isi'd. EN" G'1- N- -E,EJ'-,R'-5`
Florence & Hutcheson, Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919.851.6066
919.851.6846 (fax)
For:
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Contract No. 1306038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County. North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 l) MONITORING REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site (Site) is located one mile east of the North Carolina and South
Carolina state line, and is approximately 15 miles southwest of the Town of Lumberton, in Robeson
County. The Site is situated due east of the intersection of Cotton Valley Road and McCormick Road,
approximately one mile south of Interstate 95. The Site is located within United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03040204037010 (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality Subbasin 03- 07 -55) of the Lumber River Basin and will service the USGS 8 -digit
Cataloging Unit 03040204. The Site was identified to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program in meeting its stream and wetland restoration goals.
Primary activities at the Site included 1) stream restoration, 2) wetland restoration, 3) soil scarification,
and 4) plant community restoration. Project restoration efforts provided 5004 Stream Mitigation Units
and 5.0 Nonriverine Wetland Mitigation Units.
Seventeen vegetation plots (10 -10 meters by 10 meters and 7 -20 meters by 5 meters in size) were
established and permanently monumented. These plots were surveyed in August 2011 for the Year 4
(2011) monitoring season. Based on the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at
788 planted stems per acre surviving in Year 4 (2011). In addition, each individual plot met success
criteria. The dominant species identified at the Site were planted stems of silky dogwood (Cornus
amomum), elm (Ulmus sp.), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), overcup oak (Quercus lyrata),
cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda), and swamp chestnut oak (Quercus nsichataii), and natural recruits of
red maple (Acer rubrum). No vegetation problem areas were noted during the Year 4 (2011) monitoring
season.
Twenty cross - sections and longitudinal profiles within five 600 -foot reaches were measured for the Year
4 (2011) monitoring season. As a whole, monitoring measurements indicate minimal changes in both the
longitudinal profile and cross - sections as compared to as -built data. The channel geometry compares
favorably with the emulated, stable E/C type stream reach as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and
as constructed. Current monitoring has demonstrated dimension, pattern, and profile were stable over the
course of the monitoring period. No stream problem areas were noted during Year 4 (2011) monitoring.
Two onsite groundwater gauges and one reference groundwater gauge were maintained for the Year 4
(2011) monitoring season. Monitoring Gauge 2 was inundated /saturated within 12 inches of the surface
for greater than 12.5 percent of the growing season while Gauge 1 was shy of success criteria with
inundation/saturation within 12 inches of the surface for 10.2 percent of the growing season. In addition,
the reference gauge did not meet success criteria with inundation/saturation within 12 inches of the
surface for 3.7 percent of the Year 4 (2011) growing season. No wetland problem areas were noted.
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for vegetation, stream, and hydrology attributes in the
Fourth Monitoring Year (2011).
Pane i
1A't 0 V'S U L r'l 11 U 't.v G I.." E E K' S'
Florence: & Hutcheson

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson COMM, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVESUMMARY ............................................................................................ ............................... i
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................. ...............................
1
1.1 Location and Setting ........................................................................................... ...............................
1
1.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................... ...............................
1
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach ............................................ ...............................
1
1.4 Project History and Background .......................................................................... ..............................3
7
1.5 Monitoring Plan View .......................................................................................... ..............................5
-10
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ................................... ..............................5
-12
2.1 Vegetation Assessment ....................................................................................... ...............................
5
2. 1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria ........................................................... ...............................
5
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas ............................................................... ..............................6
2.2 Stream Assessment ............................................................................................. ...............................
6
2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria ................................................................... ..............................6
2.2.2 Bankfull Events ............................................................................... ..............................7
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas .................................................................... ...............................
8
2.2.4 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .............. ...............................
8
2.2.5 Quantitative Stream Measurements ............................................. ...............................
10
2.3 Wetland Assessment ........................................................................................... .............................10
2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria ............................................................... .............................10
2.3.2 Wetland Problem Areas ............................................................... ...............................
10
2.3.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment ........................................................ ...............................
18
3.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... .............................18
4.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... .............................20
List of Figures
Figure1. Vicinity Map ................................................................................................. ...............................
List of Tables
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives ..................................................... ............................... 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................... ..............................4
Table3. Project Contacts Table ..................................................................................... ..............................4
Table 4. Project Background Table ................................................................................ ..............................5
Table 5. Planted and Reference Forest Ecosystem ........................................................ ..............................6
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events ...................................................................... ...............................
7
Table 7A -E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment ....................... ...........................8
-10
Table 8A -B. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ..................................... ..........................11
-12
Table 9A -E. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ................................ ..........................13
-17
Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment for Year 4 ( 2011) .......................................... ...............................
18
Table 11. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results .................................................... .............................19
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results ............................................... .............................19
Page ii
,)Florence,'& Hutcheson
Co,4- sui,riiu 'EN GI'VEEA

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Appendices
APPENDIX A. VEGETATION DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX B. GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA
1. Tables B1 -B5. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
2. Cross - section Plots and Tables
3. Longitudinal Profile Plots
APPENDIX C. HYDROLOGY DATA
1. 2011 Groundwater Gauge Data
2. Figure C 1. Annual Climactic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
APPENDIX D. MONITORING PLAN VIEWS
Page iii
Florence& Hutcheson
1A, .. .
tON- SULr1.�o "EN cixEER' `

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The Site is located one mile east of the North Carolina and South Carolina state line, and approximately
3.2 miles southeast of the town of Rowland (Figure 1). The center of the Site has a latitude and longitude
of 034° 29' 31.85" N and 079° 16' 26.87" W. The Site is situated due east of the intersection of Cotton
Valley Road (SR 2492) and McCormick Road (SR 2491), approximately one mile south of Interstate 95.
The Site is located within United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local
Watershed 03040204037010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasin 03- 07 -55)
of the Lumber River Basin and will service the USGS 8 -digit Cataloging Unit 03040204 (USGS 1974,
NCWRP 2003). The Site was identified to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) in meeting its stream and wetland restoration goals.
Directions to the Site from Raleigh, North Carolina, are as follows:
➢ Take Interstate 40 East for approximately 18 miles to Interstate Highway 95 (I -95) South
➢ Take I -95 South for approximately 80 miles to Exit 2, North Carolina Highway 130 (NC -130)
➢ Take a left /travel south on NC -130 for approximately 0.1 mile to Cotton Valley Road (SR 2492)
and turn right
➢ Follow Cotton Valley Road for approximately 2 miles
➢ The project is south of Cotton Valley Road and east of McCormick Road (SR 2491)
1.2 Project Objectives
The primary components of the restoration project included 1) construction of a stable, riffle -pool stream
channel; 2) enhancement of water quality functions within, upstream, and downstream of the Site; 3)
creation of a natural vegetated buffer along restored stream channels; 4) restoration of jurisdictional
nonriverine wetlands in the Site; 5) improvement of aquatic habitat and species diversity by enhancing
stream bed variability; and 6) restoration of wildlife functions associated with a riparian corridor /stable
stream.
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
A 20.25 -acre conservation easement has been placed on the Site to incorporate all restoration activities.
The Site contains 5.0 acres of hydric soils, two first -order unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Contrary Swamp
(Northern UT and Southern UT), associated floodplain, and upland slopes. The purpose of this project
was to restore stable pattern, dimension, and profile to the UTs; restore hydrology to drained nonriverine
wetlands; and revegetate streams, floodplains, wetlands, and upland slopes within the Site. The
contributing watershed is characterized primarily by agricultural row crop production and pine
plantation/forest land. Preproject Site conditions consisted of agricultural row crop production. Land use
modifications including the removal of riparian vegetation, straightening and dredging of stream
channels, and ditching of floodplain wetlands resulted in degraded water quality and unstable channel
characteristics (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
The primary goals of this stream and wetland restoration project focused on improving water quality,
decreasing floodwater levels, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat. These goals were accomplished
by:
Florence „& Hutcheson Page 1
CO-45 VLTINd t.NGINEER5

Robeson Countj
North Carolina
PROJE(
0
2000
4000
,
/
301
501
\ \
WLAND
.
i
2460
1137
2504
\
2518
2495
301
501
1139
130
2435
2494
2492 2462
PROJECT
AREA
2493
2465
'nn 2465
2492
IP or. $
2491
2462 1
Vicinity Map
11, U.
Brown Marsh Swamp
Robeson County, North Carolina
Florence' &`,1Hutch6e ;on
' Date: 1107/08 Figure: 1
' 'CO ;NSU ;L•TING•.'E:NGI'N.E`E�RS
2463

Contract No. D06038
BrO,.t-n Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
• Reducing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural land uses by providing a
forested buffer adjacent to streams to treat surface runoff.
• Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment loads
by restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile.
• Promoting floodwater attenuation by;
• excavating a floodplain at a new bankfull elevation;
• restoring a secondary, entrenched tributary thereby reducing floodwater velocities within
smaller catchment basins;
• increasing storage capacity for floodwaters within the Site limits; and
• revegetating floodplains to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters.
• Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability, restoring a riffle -pool complex,
and by incorporating grade control /habitat structures.
• Providing wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area highly dissected by
agricultural land uses.
Primary activities at the Site included 1) stream restoration, 2) wetland restoration, 3) soil scarification,
and 4) plant community restoration. Table 1 describes the Site restoration structures and objectives,
which have provided 5004 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) 'and 5.0 Nonriverine Wetland Mitigation
Units (WMUs).
• Restored 5004 linear feet of two unnamed tributaries to Contrary Swamp (Northern UT and
Southern UT) by constructing moderately sinuous, E -type channels on new location.
• Restored 5.0 acres of nonriverine wetland within the interstream flat filling ditches, removing
elevated spoil, thereby reestablishing historic water table elevations.
• Reforested approximately 20.05 acres of floodplain, stream bank, upland slopes, and nonriverine
wetlands with native forest species.
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Restoration Segment/
Reach ID
Station Range
Restoration
T e/A roach *
Existing Linear
Footage/ Acreage
Designed Linear
Footage/Acreage
SMU/WMUs
Northern UT
10 +00 —54+65
Restoration/PII
2700
4,465
4465
Southern UT
10 +00 —15+39
Restoration/PII
442
539
539
Nonriverine Wetlands
--
Restoration
5.0
5.0
5.0
Mitigation Unit Summations
Stream
Nonriverine
Wetland
,z.xa
1
5004 SMUs
5.0 WMUS
*PII= Priority 2
1.4 Project History and Background
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information are summarized in Tables 2 -4.
Tlorence.'& Hutcheson Page 3
,Cc�iusu�r�:�o. E.seivEERS,

Contract No. 1306038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Completion
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
November 2006
December 2006
Final Design (-90 %)
NA
July 2007
Construction Completion
NA
November 2007
Site Planting
NA
January 2008
Mitigation Plan/As- builts
February 2008
April 2008
Year 1 Monitoring (2008)
November 2008
November 2008
Supplemental Planting
NA
Early 2009
Year 2 Monitoring (2009)
November 2009
November 2009
Year 3 Monitoring (2010)
November 2010
November 2010
Year 4 Monitoring (2011)
November 2011
November 2011
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer (919) 755 -9490
Designer and Monitoring Performer
Florence & Hutcheson
(Streams and Groundwater Hydrology)
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Kevin Williams (919) 851 -6066
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
Lloyd Glover
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Springs, North Carolina 27592
(919) 639 -6132
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dwight McKinney (252) 482 -8491
Monitoring Performer (Vegetation)
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolin 27603
Grant Lewis (919) 215 -1693
Florence & Hutcheson Page 4

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project County
Robeson County, North Carolina
Drainage Area
Northern UT - 1.13 square miles
Southern UT - 0.18 square mile
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
< 1
Stream Order
Second
Physiogra hic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Southeastern Plains, Atlantic Southern Loam Plains
Rosgen Classification of As -built
E - /C -type
Dominant Soil Types
Trebloc, Nahunta, Exum, Faceville
Reference Site ID
Mill Creek, UT to Wildcat Branch, UT to Hog Swamp
USGS HUC
03040204
NCDWQ Subbasin
03 -07 -55
NCDWQ Classification
C Sw (Stream Index # 14 -35 -2)
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
303d listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Not Applicable
% of project easement fenced
0%
1.5 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in the monitoring plan view in Appendix D. Site
features including vegetation, stream dimension (cross- sections), stream profile and pattern, wetland
hydrology, and photographic documentation were monitored in Year 4 (2011).
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Following Site construction, seventeen plots (10 -10 meters by 10 meters and 7 -20 meters by 5 meters in
size) were established and monumented with metal fence posts at all plot corners and PVC at each plot
origin. Sampling was conducted as outlined in the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version
4.0 (Lee et al. 2006) ( http: / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm); results are included in Appendix A. The
taxonomic standard for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia,
and Surrounding Areas (Weakley 2007). The locations of vegetation monitoring plots were placed to
accurately represent the entire Site and are depicted on the monitoring plan view in Appendix D.
2.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community
elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria are dependent upon the density and growth
of characteristic forest species. Additional success criteria are dependent upon density and growth of
"Character Tree Species." Character Tree Species include planted species, species identified through
visual inventory of an approved reference (relatively undisturbed) forest community used to orient the
Site design, and appropriate community descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) including Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp and
Florence, be Hutcheson Page 5

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Nonriverine Wet Hardwood Forest. All canopy tree species planted and identified in the reference forest
will be utilized to define "Character Tree Species" as termed in, the success criteria. Table 5 below
outlines planted and reference forest species.
Table 5. Planted and Reference Forest Ecosystem
Planted and Reference Forest Ecosystem Character Tree Species
Red maple (Ater rubrum)
Ironwood (Cazpinus caroliniana)
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
Water tupelo (Nyssa Mora)
Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia)
Overcup oak (Quercus lyrata)
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michazzxii)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
American elm (Ulmus arnericana)
Success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre of Character Tree Species must be
surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 Character Tree Species per acre must be
surviving in year 4 and 260 Character Tree Species per acre in year 5.
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
During Year 1 (2008) monitoring, vegetation sampling across the Site was above the required average
density with 476 stems per acre of Character Tree Species surviving; however, five of the seventeen plots
had low densities (plots 12 and 14 -17). Approximately 5 acres of the Site with low densities of stem
survival were replanted at a density of 680 stems per acre in early 2009 prior to Year 2 (2009) monitoring.
These areas appear to be recovering well. No vegetation problem areas were noted during the Year 4
(2011) monitoring season.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Twenty permanent cross - sections within five 600 -foot reaches were established after construction was
completed. Measurements of each cross - section include points at all breaks in slope including top of
bank, bankfull, and thalweg. Riffle cross - sections are classified using the Rosgen stream classification
system. Longitudinal profile measurements of five 600 -foot reaches include thalweg, water surface, and
bankfull; with each measurement taken at the head of facets (i.e. riffle, run, pool, and glide) in addition to
the maximum pool depth.
2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria
Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1) successful classification of the reach as a
functioning stream system (Rosgen 1996) and 2) channel variables indicative of a stable stream system.
,Florence: & Hutcheson Page 6
w.... _... ......... _............ _....., .. - ,.................
-��NSULrINa ErGIVEE95,

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
The channel configuration will be measured on an annual basis in order to track changes in channel
geometry and profile. These data will be utilized to determine the success in restoring stream channel
stability. Specifically, the width -to -depth ratio should characterize an E -type or borderline E -/C -type
channel, bank- height ratios indicative of a stable or moderately unstable channel, and minimal changes in
cross - sectional area, channel width, and/or bank erosion along the monitoring reach. In addition, channel
abandonment and /or shoot cutoffs must not occur and sinuosity values must remain relatively constant.
The field indicator of bankfull will be described in each monitoring year and indicated on a representative
channel cross - section figure. If the stream channel is down- cutting or the channel width is enlarging due
to bank erosion, additional bank or slope stabilization methods will be employed. Stream substrate is not
expected to coarsen over time; therefore, pebble counts are not proposed as part of the stream success
criteria.
Visual assessment of in- stream structures will be conducted to determine if failure has occurred. Failure
of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure, undermining of the structure, abandonment of
the channel around the structure, and /or stream flow beneath the structure.
2.2.2 Bankfull Events
Documented bankfull events are included in the table below. At least five bankfull events were
documented to date during the Year 4 (2011) monitoring period for a total of twelve bankfull events.
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events
*as recorded at a nearby station in Lumberton (Weather Underground 2011)
Florence r& Hutcheson Page 7
C'0'v°svL, r1-4�i ENct: EGRS.
Photo (if
Date of Occurrence
Method
available
April 5, 2008
A total of 3.73 inches of rain fell on April 5, 2008 *.
--
September 6, 2008
A total of 4.6 inches of rain fell on September 5 -6, 2008*
Photos 1 -2
A total of 2.0 inches of rain fell on February 28 -March 1, 2009 *. In
March 1, 2009
addition wrack was documented within the flood lain during a Site visit.
--
A total of 3.3 inches of rain fell on November 10 -12, 2009* resulting from
November 11, 2009
Tropical Storm Ida
May 23, 2010
A total of 2.7 inches of rain fell on May 22 -24, 2010 *.
--
July 27, 2010
A total of 2.9 inches of rain fell on July 27, 2010 *.
September 27, 2010
A 7.7 -inch* rainfall event occurring between September 26 -30, 201 *.
--
February 5, 2011
A 2.5 -inch* rainfall event occurring between February 2 -5, 2011 *.
--
July 5, 2011
A 3.1 -inch* rainfall event occurring between July 4 -6, 2011 *.
August 12, 2011
A 3.5 -inch* rainfall event occurring between August 12 -14, 2011 *.
--
A total of 4.4 inches* of rainfall occurring between August 19 -22, 2011 *
August 19, 2011
one week after a total of 3.5 inches of rain.
--
A total of 2.0 inches* of rainfall occurring between August 26 -27, 2011 *
August 26, 2011
after a total of 7.9 inches of rain the previous two weeks.
--
*as recorded at a nearby station in Lumberton (Weather Underground 2011)
Florence r& Hutcheson Page 7
C'0'v°svL, r1-4�i ENct: EGRS.

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
Photos 1 -2: Wrack and remnant flooding
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas
No stream problem areas were documented within the Site during the Year 4 (2011) monitoring period.
2.2.4 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Each stream reach was visually inspected during the Year 4 (2011) monitoring period using eight feature
categories and various metrics within each category. Assessment features included riffles, pools, thalweg,
meanders, channel bed, structures, and root wads /boulders. Tables for semi - quantitative assessements of
each reach are included in Appendix B (Tables 131 -135). The mean percentage of performance for
features within each reach are summarized in the tables below.
Table 7A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment: Brown Marsh (Reach 1)
Feature
Year 1
2008
Year 2
2009
Year 3
2010
Year 4
2011
Year 5
2012
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
C.Thalwe
100%
100%
100%
100%
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100%
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
100%
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
H. Wads and Boulders
NA
NA
NA
NA
FloHutcheson Page 8
cOnue Utc iNuE .............
8R5

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
Table 7B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment: Brown Marsh (Reach 2)
Feature
Year 1
2008
Year 2
2009)
Year 3
2010
Year 4
2011
Year 5
2012
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
j
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
- `�= °011
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100 %..
�'�'=. _ ���
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
" 'M-'-
?d�deb.. �v%
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100%
F. Banks
0
100 /0
0
100 /0
0
100 /0
0
100 /o
WINE I .� ,�
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
.
VMS=
H. Wads and Boulders
NA
NA
NA
NA
�„° , �l�. � � ,
Table 7C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Brown Marsh Reach 3)
Feature
Year 1
2008
Year 2
2009
Year 3
2010
Year 4
2011
Year 5
2012
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
W� S
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
- `�= °011
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100%
�'�'=. _ ���
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100%
N
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
100%
WINE I .� ,�
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
.
VMS=
H. Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
I WIN
Table 7D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Brown Marsh (Reach 4)
Feature
Year 1
2008
Year 2
2009
Year 3
2010
Year 4
2011
Year 5
2012
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
W� S
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
- `�= °011
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100%
'
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100 %
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100 %',Y,;
-'
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
100%
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
rM
H. Wads and Boulders
0
100%
0
100 /0
0
100 /0
100 /o
%
'
9 Florence,& Hutcheson Page 9
ENG114EER5,

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
Table 7E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Brown Marsh (Reach 5)
Feature
Year 1
2008
Year 2
2009
Year 3
2010
Year 4
2011
Year 5
2012)
A. Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
B. Pools
100%
100%
100%
100 %�
1 all
C. Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
100%
D. Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100 %�
E. Bed General
100%
100%
100%
100%
F. Banks
100%
100%
100%
100%
011
G. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
NA
NA
NA
NA
Tom.. _
H. Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100 %''
2.2.5 Quantitative Stream Measurements
During the Year 4 (2011) monitoring period 20 cross - sections and longitudinal profiles within five 600 -
foot reaches were measured. Permanent cross - sections and longitudinal profiles are included in Appendix
B; each is graphically depicted for as -built through Year 4 (2011) for analysis. Reach 1 did not have
water during Year 4 (2011) stream measurements; therefore, water surface slopes could not be calculated.
As a whole, monitoring measurements indicate minimal changes in both the longitudinal profile and
cross - sections as compared to as -built data. The channel geometry compares favorably with the
emulated, stable E/C type stream reach as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and as constructed.
Current monitoring has demonstrated dimension, pattern, and profile were stable over the course of the
monitoring period. Tables for quantitative assessments are included below; these tables include data from
previous years.
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Two groundwater monitoring gauges and one reference groundwater gauge were maintained and
monitored throughout the Year 4 (2011) growing season. Graphs of groundwater hydrology and
precipitation from a nearby rain station (Weather Underground 2011) are included in Appendix C.
2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria
Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for at least 12.5 percent within
Trebloc soils (nonriverine wetlands) of the growing season, during average climatic conditions. This
value is based on DRAINMOD simulations for 62 years of rainfall data in an old field stage. These areas
are expected to support hydrophytic vegetation. If wetland parameters are marginal a jurisdictional
determination will be performed for vegetation and soils in these areas (Environmental Laboratory 1987).
2.3.2 Wetland Problem Areas
No wetland problem areas were identified within the Site during Year 4 (2011) monitoring.
1A Florence-& Hutcheson Page 10
CO V'S LFLTIN0 tsGINEE95,

L
CC
E
E
U
(Q
i
'O
'O
C
CS
O =
o �
� R
d
i LYi
0
� a
„ E
c �
" s
es
� L
R
00
3
CQ L
F 01
M
V
r
II
III
II
III
N
02
°
II
11
II
m
°
II
W
r
I
I
O
II
11
II
II
G
W
(N
q
Cl)
M
N
I--
M
0
Lo
�7
i
(D
V
O
r
Cl)
00
m
(OM
N
QN
C
N
00
M
0
N
N
10
N
m
p
N
O
L
O
00
(IR
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
M
II
M
c
G
r
r�
C
r
N
r
II
II
II
11
II
it
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
r
O
II
II
w
O
Lo
N
(o
N
d
v =Q
d
N
O
M
r
M
00
M
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
N
II
II
U
00
r
W
r
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
r
O
O
II
Ll1
L
:Q
O
to
O
r
N
N
L L
E
V
r
M
a
Cr Ul
N
cr
M
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
M
N
N
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
r
O
II
LLl
W
y �
�+
k
_
N
M
I-
N
O
v
,Q
•� d
v
(D
M
M
6)
O
N
M
M
II
11
II
II
II
II
O
O
�
r
O
O
00
r
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
.-
0
°�,�
O
II
II
�
Ur
r
r
II
II
II
r
00
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
C C
O
O
y
k
'y
Gz7 C
R
LO
� O
�U
v
.N N
d
�
CD
x
N
dp N
(Q
(Q
.4?
V
C
(�
CA
C
;D a
• 2'
c
v
c
c
c
c1^•
cam,
c
ci
. _.
c
O
sR•
�
L��
33¢00`Lv
G
_
Cc,
-7:;
^p
O
O
°
o
L
U'c
3
4
a
°
0
c°
L_
ocf)
m
a3LL)m
a�
_�
°�'
a>U
o
3
"`
cn
U
r
�
x
3
L.
y
L
m
y
R
C
d
6i
y
9

ce
v
►�i /1
C
� N
O w
s �
Q. a
o �
R
c
M
W
00 C
� O
E"' m
'O
Cl)
N
N
N
O
p
M
M
II
11
II
II
O
M
N
'
N
N
00
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
LU
II
II
O
o
O
M
M
N
N
00
W
U
h to
o_
M
C'J
O
Q
C
OLO
N
N
N
M
O
M
U7
41
U')
0
co
O
N
M
�
00
N
N
M
r
V
O
A
CO
O
�'1
[D
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
°
II
c„
M
r
r
M
II
it
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
LLI
G
O
C
bL
'
x
M
LO
�
M
O
r
A
C
M
N
N
N
N
w
R
w
N
O
1)
O
O
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
N
°
II
II
w
v U
G
O
M
r
M
�
O
�
II
II
11
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
LLl
L 'O
O
4.1
w :a
w
w
w L
w
M
p
O
O
cD
O
M
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
N
M
II
II
M
N
�
N
N
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
�
O
II
LlJ
L
w v
a
x
N
OM
r
v
O
N
w
C
w
C
to
O
Co
co
w
•L L
9
r
p
r
of
O
M
N
O
N
II
it
II
II
II
II
O
O
M
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
0
°
II
II
Ln
Ur
N
II
II
II
M
II
11
II
II
it
II
II
O
II
C C
CD
a
W e
v
� O
L C„)
LO
O
o
w
OA
x
a� U
14 E
CQ
3
.
on p
a
►7
�
= G
7
3
3
¢
(�
Q
U
3
C
G
v
U
G
=,
v
•�
a
O kn
.O
00
.p
L
,.
a�
O
U%
C
U
G CL
U
a
G
ti
3-
y
.�
y
Ai
m
o
o
c
x
v
3
o
w
a
o
C
y
ro
7b
G
�
cC
0
i
D
o
3
c
m
>
c
U
cG
m>
s
U
N tc
n
y
U
w
y
C
i
C
C
t
w
CO
9

L
E
E
7
b0
C
.O
.0
0
dot
C.0
L
9
r
R +
o c y
c E o
s o
moo+ s
R
s
� o �
F � �
N
p
,
L'
O
N
o
m
m
v
Q
Q
Q
�o
}
ai
in
r
.n
o-
Z
Z
Z
r
o
v
+
o
M
z
Z
Z
o
O
L
ea
�
¢
--
Z
Z
Z
r
o
Q
¢
Q'
7
00
}
A
—
zzzro
+
4+
o
Vi
^+
M
la.
�
c}
G
icc'
G
_
C
G
N
w
W
N
'0
F
N
z
Lo
_
cc
I
O
O
�
O
O
V
O
0
0
0+
e
d¢
z
Z
z
o0
0
pa
G
Z
Z
Z
G
Z
rl
7
C
a
Z
Z
Z
'c'
r
r
.--•
N
Z
Z
Z
00
G
G
N—
00
ry
N
Z
O
O
a
x
O
x
'c
G
.G
nl
M
z
N
NO
H
Z
C—
N
u
+
oY
O
M
V
i^
OO
-
r
O
7
00
O
Z
O
G
s
64
64
62
E
E
-
v
j
v
Ei
A
?
>=
v
o
m
e
U
m
_
c>C
3
^
N
d
>
Ln
0
3
cC
a°
a°
;
m
�m
3
0
3
m
y
U
n
o
0
y^-o
�m
u:
3=
r'
c
a
U
F
r
nC
L
7

t'
O
7
C
.o
C
O
V
7
'O
T
r' 00
t`
C N
R �
O � O
L
O L
� � N
C� C
R L V
n
U
G
0
0
U
r
0
ro
u
v
a
0
w°
�
+
N
�
LR
o
M
G
^
M
^
N
M
^
G
fi
T
O
T
•y
C
.--
N
Z
Z
z
N
G
a
}r
p
•'
VJ
O
. s
M..
O
O
l�
l�
Q
Q
Q
�O
M}
'v
v
m
O1
N
Z
Z
Z
N
N
N
O
c¢
C'
N
�-+
o
N
N
�
o
_
7
M
O
_
�
C
I�r
O
W
U
_
M
y
O
G
G
^
.-.
N
W
•-
G
L
O
O
e
�
Qz
M
7°
G
N
C
<<
O
O
M
rq
G
G
0
N
4
M
N
OT
c�
G
Q`
^
•--•
M
Z
z
Z^
U
+
°
d�
e
�
}
OM
o
VJ
Z
z
Z
L
O
O
U
rq
C4
N
ON
•�
M
Z
Z
z
°O
7
00
O
•-•
O
x<.
V
�D
O
I
W
Q
Q�
7}
CO
N
•�
M
z
z
z:1
I
N
T
N
G
iMit
p
N
>
c
s
s�
a
a
v
,=,
-E
a!
s
.�
s
to
i
s
U
N
O
Y
u
O
cy
2
C1
'O
'7
w_
C4
4-
6,
p
�L
R
F
F
V
L
@
3
v
m
w
3
y
s
a
c
a
o
L
c4
z
0.
D
i
Gi
�. r£
a
I
I
I
1
10.1 `
9
n
U
G
0
0
U
r
0
ro
u
v
a
0
w°

C
.O
.0
I�
R
L
'O
c �
� 3 +
L � M
o r
Fina
^�
o
0
N-
N
Z
z
Z-
a
y
�
N
Z
Z
Z
^�
O
L
R
�
y
N
z
z
z^
°O
C
N
Z
Z
Z
M—
tt
c,
}
c
cCe
�
M
^
U�'
x
10
M
cq
M
'�
V l
O^
OM
m
•--•
O
O
o
W
OOr
-
00
7
�^
M
r
Q
Q
Q
M
°
O\
7
N
�O
Y
M
'
_
N
Z
Z
Z
N
N
°
v
+
o
Vi
O
_
N
Z
Z
Z
7
y
^
oo
N
Q
z
Q¢
Z
Z
M
M
-.
N
Y
�'
Cl
O
?°
O
v
X
'^
Z
V
U
N
N
Mo
r
O
G
`.'
O_
N°
Cl
M
z
7
a
M
Z
z
Z
^1
N
7
�
43
M
M
Z
rC'1
00
O
O
6
13,
Cd
°
7
00
—
�
'
O
L
M
,.
G
G
N
ol
N
.4
O
O
O
`D
'�
d
�
O.
4!
Z,
�•
N
�
�
3
�
�
`U
=
�q
: D
C
y
y
� V
ui
O.
y
b
C
�
.`.4
y
cn
y
m
U
R
u
<:
y
O o
o
..
u
„ pj
�"
T
—'y
N
y
m
�
w
vn
3
N
a
o
d
O
L
a
z
y
u
'O
iY
C
v'�
Gr
a
a
d

L
C�
G
7
C
.Q
C
O
G
R
I+ti
9
C
a
0
0
s
a
aQ.
1�
Q\
.n
F
a
E
3
s
L
C
3
0
N
N
e
O
GC
L
a
a
L
U�
ie
N
N
N
M
N
G
N
O
_
N
N
M
O
C
O
^
M
N
C\
°
}
}
N
i'
c
'ccO
b
^r
r
N
Z
Z
Z
M
u^
}
N
R
}}C
N
v
M
Z
Z
Z
V
^
L
U
°
z
z
z
n^
'n
M
Z
Z
Z
O
O
O
O
N
K}
C
N
°
C
•
Y
��
U
00
CC
^
N
00
M
^
vt
0
'�
1
'}c'
O
N
•--
N
00
V
O
N^
C
U
v7
t^
Q
M
2
�
M
z
z
R
o0
O
ri'
rr�
C
O
YY+
ttl
r
O
L
O
rya
�n
Q
G,
O
N
v
co
O
Q
T
M
O^
}
S�
h
OM
z
00
M
2
M
O
O
i
,O
z^
C
z
I
U
O
O
•,
L7
O
^
-
N
Q
Z
Q
Z
<
Z
=
...
C
G
N
O+
N
Z
.-•
'V
d
°
M
r
CV
Q
Q
Q
r
N
}
„`
4�J
N
in
�
N
�
�
�O
r
�.
_
V1
N
0
v1
C
•rCte
n
N
Z
Z
Z
U
-
I
v
}
N
^
R
V
Q
Q
Q
N^
z
Z
z
NO
J
L
CC
C[
cd
N
E
Ca
I
X
U
.L
"
Sb
`✓
L
0A
^.
L
'`.
A
>
p
O
d
y
u
C
A
U
m
3
m
m
3LJ
m
v
T
=
b
w
0
0
c
U
a
o
o
in
d
R
R
c
T•
C
.
a
-
k
LC.
d
'+gyp.

C
b0
C
O
C
O
V
L
n
..J
G
O G
r�
a�L
_o z
rG L
r
�
s`
Z
Z
Z
--
�
=O
�
V
Z
Z
Z
C.
z
z
O
N
z
��aQQQ
-Mzzz
�_r
^
_
5
L
M
u
^
N
^
N
N
L
d
+
r
L
ev
G
O
O
co
V
e
p
....
(0
Obi
N^
=
N
O
N
b
L
W
Q
.;
G-,
M
—
——
2
Z
z
!-l!
M
G
L
U
�
�.
O
µ
C
QZ
M
N
Z
Z
Z
-
O
G
ar0
^
z
y
N
N
R
00
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
^_
^
N
C\
ry
N
MO
N
dsgt;
° a
Z
P
H
2
V
z
v1
00
C,
�
.+
Ln
V1
It
_
e
a
2
N
L
1
L=
f-C
CL
02
#!
3
Q
Q
Q
a
u
o
c
v
A
b
b
I
.,eb
N
v
3
y
v
FS
�>�
a
0.
N
kN'
p
O
kill
o
7
c
az
a
Q
1':a

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (201 1) MONITORING REPORT
2.3.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment
Monitoring Gauge 2 was inundated /saturated within 12 inches of the surface for greater than 12.5 percent
of the growing season while Gauge 1 was just shy of success criteria with inundation /saturation within 12
inches of the surface for 10.2 percent of the growing season. In addition, the reference gauge did not
meet success criteria for the Year 4 (2011) monitoring season (Table 11). Hydrographs containing
groundwater and precipitation data for each gauge can be found in Appendix C in addition to a graph
depicting annual rainfall at the Lumberton Airport versus 30 -year historic rainfall data collected in
Lumberton (Weatherunderground 2011, NOAA 2004). Groundwater data has been collected through
August 2011 and will continue to be collected for the remainder of the growing season (until November
14, 201 1).
Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment for Year 4 (2011)
Gauge ID
Hydrology
Threshold
Met?
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Criteria Met?
Site
Mean
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Site
Mean
1
No
Yes
50%
1
Yes
2
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
3
Yes
100%
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7'
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
11
Yes
12
Yes
13
Yes
14
Yes
15
Yes
16
Yes
17
Yes
3.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Site achieved the defined (or targeted) success criteria, with saturation (free water) within one foot of
the soil surface for a minimum of 12.5 percent (30 consecutive days) of the growing season at monitoring
Gauge 2 while Gauge 1 was just shy of success criteria with inundation/saturation within 12 inches of the
surface for 10.2 percent of the growing season. In addition, the reference gauge did not meet success
criteria for the Year 4 (2011) monitoring season. A summary of groundwater gauge data is included in
Table 11. Based on the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at 788 planted stems
per acre surviving in Year 4 (2011) (Table 12). In addition, each individual plot met success criteria.
Florence,r-& HUtehes *dn Page 18
t ON's UVrINC ENWfNEEks-

Contract No. 1306038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Table 11. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
*Data was collected through August 29, 2011; data will continue to be collected for the remainder of the Year 4 (2011) growing
season (through November 14, 2011).
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 3 (2010)
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009)
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)*
Year 5 (2012)
1
Yes /68 days
Yes /53 days
No /29 days
No /25 days
567
607
(28 percent)
(21.5 percent)
(11.8 percent)
(10.2 percent)
IF
2
Yes /35 days
Yes /55 days
Yes /35 days
Yes /53 days
, ,
728
(23 percent)
(22.4 percent)
(14.2 percent)
(21.5 percent)
-�
Ref 1
34 days
42 days
13 days
9 days�fia`r`r
607
607
(14 percent)
(17.1 percent)
(5.3 percent)
(3.7 p ercent),�
x
*Data was collected through August 29, 2011; data will continue to be collected for the remainder of the Year 4 (2011) growing
season (through November 14, 2011).
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Planted Stems /Acre Counting Towards Success Criteria
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009)
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)
Year 5 (2012)
1
526
809
850
890'
2
486
567
607
607
3
445
526
526
1012
WA
G-%x VA
4
243
850
728
688a
5
971
1214
1214
647
1� tN ,b,w10"MR
6
445
607
607
324
7
405
850
1012
486
R'G51" 10`012 1_:
8
809
1214
1335
850htAVIR�
9
931
1052
1012
1335
W 1'4`
10
1093
1012
971
1012;
11
405
486
486
1174
> 3.yyoy,r:xr.,y,JC.F�,y+^ }r P •!+`��1�', A
�.;;;�'S5+3= �'+m�;�,�.., n%G'
12
40
162
202
526"
13
567
607
647
607:}
-
14
162
647
890
850*
15
40
526
971
1052
16
202
445
526
607x,.;,,
17
81
647
890
728"
b
Average of All
Plots (1 -17)'
476
705
793
788
5xN
Florence•& Hutchesdn Page 19
COV`sucrf�c, Es,Gv,*Eses,

Contract No. 1306038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
4.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y -87 -1. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0. (online). Available: http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). 2003. Lumber River Basin Watershed
Restoration Plan (online). Available:
http: / /www.nceep. net / services /restplans/Lumber_2003.pdf [November 21, 2006]. North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
United States Geological Survey (USGS): 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina.
Weakley, Alan S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online).
Available: http: / /www. herbarium .unc.edu /WeakleysFlora.pdf [February 1, 2008]. University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2011. Station in Lumberton, North Carolina. (online). Available:
http: / /www.wunderground.com/ history/airport/KLBT /2010 /11/9 /Custom History. [October 13,
2011 ]. Weather Underground.
Florence:& Hutcheson Page 20
Coasurri`vu E�tct:��`�ds

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site; Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Fidrence; & Hutcheson Appendices
CUY5UL -rI 1 3 ENGINEERS.

a-i
M
r-I
c r-I
3 O
CT N
LL d\
0
.c
O
U
E
6
N
Q
Q)
Ln
Q
c-I
0
cVV+ u
E N
0) a)
C
? N
to 3
c co
O / �
U Ln
O
O Qx 00
v ! O o
Of U U I,
V
E
v
v
Y
c
(O
[ -7
Y
m
V1
Ln Y
4)
N .>
Ln
3 4J
U -p
X 3
N U
N c
F.. N
t
L
T m
L ()
U >
(0 �
U
L (�f
O a1
� L
Q
L
V N
m L
L U
N m
CL L
N Q
E
4) N
Y E
N
°,
Cl
W N
J
zQ
(A
a E
N N Q)
N
t s L
+J Y Q)
Y
c
4) a) 3
N N
Ln
L
V V 3
a) 4) +'
0 o
c
Q Q
U U
r4 r4 c
LU w M
Ml
v
Y
U
m
Q
E
N
E
4)
V,
Y
O
4-
O
c
4)
U
N
Q
U
c
m
N
4)
U
c
4)
L
3
U
U
N O
aJ ,�
O
Q) L
O_ 4)
N
E
c
NL
3
4) N
N
N
m in
U
L u
O N
� qA
>E
o
c �
O Y
Y c
3 4)
Y 4)
N �
N
v �
c
4)
=3 o t
0 uU
L f4
L.L J a)
ar
L
m
N
E
4)
Y
N
C
.Ln
E
c
ca
ca
4)
_O
Q.
t
V
f6
L
O
w
N
_v
U
4)
Q
N
5
U
m
4)
O
N N
4J E
u Y
cu
Q O N
N O_
t s c bn
0 0 >
4) 4)
0 0 LU
a) a) Z
O_ O_
4�4g
> a
0
_0 _0 Y
() 4) c
3
� � U
4) 4)
> > O
L< v
(III M Y
E E m 3 E U
� � x
Q 4)
4)
3
X
4)
Q)
(6
E
tw
c
.N
E
c
(O
4)
O
Q
m
O C
=
a,
E
L`a
aCL
c
fl-
m
= o
d E
I-
a
a
a,
L
c,
L
a
IA tA
m m
m
C
a
m m
m m
CL ^'
0 m
O'
0
m
w
cc
C
'a 'a
u 4-
V
E
v
v
Y
c
(O
[ -7
Y
m
V1
Ln Y
4)
N .>
Ln
3 4J
U -p
X 3
N U
N c
F.. N
t
L
T m
L ()
U >
(0 �
U
L (�f
O a1
� L
Q
L
V N
m L
L U
N m
CL L
N Q
E
4) N
Y E
N
°,
Cl
W N
J
zQ
(A
a E
N N Q)
N
t s L
+J Y Q)
Y
c
4) a) 3
N N
Ln
L
V V 3
a) 4) +'
0 o
c
Q Q
U U
r4 r4 c
LU w M
Ml
v
Y
U
m
Q
E
N
E
4)
V,
Y
O
4-
O
c
4)
U
N
Q
U
c
m
N
4)
U
c
4)
L
3
U
U
N O
aJ ,�
O
Q) L
O_ 4)
N
E
c
NL
3
4) N
N
N
m in
U
L u
O N
� qA
>E
o
c �
O Y
Y c
3 4)
Y 4)
N �
N
v �
c
4)
=3 o t
0 uU
L f4
L.L J a)
ar
L
m
N
E
4)
Y
N
C
.Ln
E
c
ca
ca
4)
_O
Q.
t
V
f6
L
O
w
N
_v
U
4)
Q
N
5
U
m
4)
O
N N
4J E
u Y
cu
Q O N
N O_
t s c bn
0 0 >
4) 4)
0 0 LU
a) a) Z
O_ O_
4�4g
> a
0
_0 _0 Y
() 4) c
3
� � U
4) 4)
> > O
L< v
(III M Y
E E m 3 E U
� � x
Q 4)
4)
3
X
4)
Q)
(6
E
tw
c
.N
E
c
(O
4)
O
Q
}
m
Q
G
O
m
a
a)
c
O
m
O
Q1
U L
2 2
3 3
O O
CD m
n
r-I
a, o
o m o a.
V Z M M
u w •a ()
a
N E
CL a 0 W)
O C
a m
E
o a
fl-
a
N
d E
N
v1
M
m C
m
H
1 N
0 m
O'
0
m
w
ac
w a W
m
.+
a-� N
Z.,
L
o o
m
E
m
E
m 4 N N
E_
a
a
a
o Q
a L=o
}
m
Q
G
O
m
a
a)
c
O
m
O
Q1
U L
2 2
3 3
O O
CD m
n
r-I
a, o
o m o a.
V Z M M
u w •a ()
a
N E
CL a 0 W)

_
N
Y
ca
N
W
bb
_
�a
3
u
_
V
_
Y
f0
O
a
m
a
on
c
=a
Z
C
a
E
a,
�o
O
t-
4A
E
W
v
N
C
3
0
0
is
c
M
Ln
M
L
v tD
oJ O
00
rl
C
a a,
CO -0
2 J
cc
N
Ln
c
0
E i
� O
Z `^
a
U cc
O Ln
0 L
(a
a �
c
3
0
m`
-0 Ln
o
v�
v c
v 3
'0 0
a` m`
0
c
0
a
0
sa!aads #
ri
N
O
N
ri
ON
Ln
O
ri
ri
N
d
N
ri
O
N
3H:)V bad sale ;S
9n!lJNianlJX3
N
Ln
Ln
r,
to
N
ri
M
Ln
01
M
Ln
ri
W
Ln
N
suaa ;S 1uln l
!
N
r-I
N
ri
ri
00
ri
N
M
N
N
ri
r-1
N
N
ri
N
3213d Had
SW81S;luln!l le;ol
In
r-
't
Ln
m
M
M
r4
o
l
Ln
Ln
ri
r-i
3U:)V Mad
rl
N
00
00
m
L0
r`
Ln
rn
N
slua ;$ (laa ;Union)
ri
Ln
H
°
m
O
m
�
oo
0
o
0
r,
-1
Ln
ct
N
oo
rn
ri
Ln
`r-11
r-�6
"i
oMl
Ln
LW0
r,
0)
-1
t00
lein;eN
3aJt/
213d sale ;S anll
r,
N
00
00
m
w
r,
Ln
am
M
9NI(3fil:)X3 suaa ;$
ri
M'
Ln
Ln
ri
cn
o
m
00
o
r'
Ln
�
00
01
ri
Ln
r'
N
2u!nll Pa ;Ueld
0)
ri
rI
r-I
Ln
ri
l0
00
ci
r-I i
N
to
n
01
r-I
to
N
3H:)V aad swa ;S
2uln!lpa ;ueld
o°
Ln
°
Ln
°00
0����ri0
M
rM-I
4
oo
O
oo
Ln
oo
N
O
d
d-
am
ri
ri
oo
w
O
ri
sale ;s
anll 9NIafIl:)X3
N
Ln
N
--I-
N
SWa ;S iluln!l le;ol
O
a)
n
0
ri
0
00
oo
rl
4
ItT
N
Lo
oo
O
Ln
m
M
r-I
o
r\
ri
t0
N
n
O
O
Ln
Ln
O
rl
O
00
N
00
l0
r-I
to
Lo
M
d'
00
1-4
ri
r-I
Ln
Lo
00
r-I
to
r,
�uln!
O
-
rNoor,iioom
-iir
Lwr,O
nr,o
suaa; a ;o
S 11 1
rn0000t
N00
nm0r
-iN0
Ln
oorn
00
w
r-I
to
to
m
qzr
00
ri
r-I
r-i
Ln
w
00
a-i
to
00
swa ;s (aaa;unlon)
ease N
rn�Lnoo�oor-ri�LoMr,rnmriLnto
N'�Zt
'It
N
M
N
M
ri
N
ri
N
M
M
Ln
r-1
ri
ri
slua ;$
�
m
Lo
Ln
00
00
r�
ri
ct
to
m
rl
m
m
r-I
Ln
0
2u!ss!W /peas
N
m
N
M
ri
N
-1
N
m
m
Ln
ri
ri
N
4
ri
Ln
sale ;s an!l
9NlafilJX3 SLUOIS
0
2U!n!l pa;ueld
r
N
o
N
rMi
ON
Ln
O
ri
-N
ri
ct
v
N
rH
O
N
swa ;S
2u!n!l pa;ueld
N
N
Ln
ri
Ln
N
r\
ri
Lo
ri
oo
N
ri
ri
N
m
m
Ln
N
01
N
M
r♦
Ln
ri
ri
N
Lo
N
Ln
ri
N
N
;Old
ri
N
M
Ln
to
00
al
OO
ri
.N-r
.m-I
r�-1
r�-I
.^-1

O
r
L
O
O
-I
N
M
Lr?
Lr)
�
M
v
a
r
=
O
N
N
l0
N
r1
O
N
N
e 1
U
0
O
pp
O
-1
N
M
�D
>
N
41
Z
a,
a
O
hL
PEW
c
0
c
Y
C
00
C
N
N
ct
N
�
CN
G
N
N
O
N
N
ri
M
M
l0
N
c-I
C,4
r-I
M
M
00
N
�--I
`�
lD
c-I
N
N
rl
lD
N
ci
M
N
r-I
L!)
M
O
N
4!
6
0
O
Y
f6
0
m
O
Y
Q)
E
E
O
',�
N
Q
(E
O
C
c6
Y
ra
O
aJ
co
aJ
m
Z
r0
++
i
m
O
O
Q
N
O
i
0—
-O
Y
E
C
c
O
o
a
c
+�
c
v
i
a�
s
3
�_
3
Y
w
C
co
°
a)
a)
,,,
c
°
aJ
'L
O
N
C
O
C
N
no
N
ca
N
7
>
V
a
r
f0
3
a,
3
V
`—°
E
3
+�+
v
E
E
E
,_`
N
E
3
.�
0
°
m
u
E
Q
O
V
EO
EO
N
0
.�Q
a
a u
H
°
u
U
E
H
°
°
°
°
a,
.0
°
a
a
�)
C
3
E
j
ice.
h
u
L-
N
°
a
'C
V
O
a
h
v
a
`^
O
O
'A
v
a
k
a
E
E
a
N
Ij
v0f
c>
a
v
i
n,
QZ
o
o'cZ�
��
-°
a
v
a
U
Ln

vi
�
k
$
E
in
0
#
m
co
�
c
�
§
e
N
N
00
c
2
m
w
e
1-4
c
§ m
-
7
$
\
e
/%
m
N»
m
7
m
m
E
2
2
\
o
0
3
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
m
o
0
0
o
0 /
\ �
0
u
_
_
ƒ
\
_
E
«
°
\
E
/
/
(
f
f
M
E
\
/
/
0
\
\
/
§
\
U/
5
°
»"
E¥=
0
/
R
2
k
E
f
r4
§
E=
\
§
E/
-O
§
E
/
®°
\
°
k
±
=
5
0
U
E
#
LI
±
\
5
o
a)
\
o
[®
E
o
u
E
0
o
R
/
a
2
0
@
o
•
[
E
§
\
/
c
2
2
\
o
@
)
2
®@�
IA
»
§
/
0
E
*
2
[
*
\
B
o�
0
a
E
E
®
o�
k
0)
®
2
3
r
Ln
0§°
2
o
o
q§
S)
$
§
§:
:
Q
a
o
�
7
]
\
L\\
g
%
O»)
\
\
[
/
C
)
\
/
/
/
[
/
\
cr
e
CI
\
k
Qf
Q

O
a
aJ
ao
ra
E
�v
O
c
i-1
N
e 1
00
Y
C
D
IA
u
0)
e-i
r-I
N
ei
c I
a I
ri
00
C
D
d
O m
.-1
u1
N
m
O
o0
m
r-1
MIZT
r-1
d'
1.n
M
N
�.. E
r4
rl
N
N
r-1
M
e-i
—1
N
N
ri
e-I
M
m
'O
0)
OA
m
E iA
f6 '
o
m
e-i
N
O
.-i
M
N
N
I-
O
a--I
O
O
-'1
O
N
a--1
M
N
O
a+ f0
� U
3
O
U
Q
rl
N
M
d'
V1
l0
I-
00
m
O0
m
�
l-D
N
N
.--I
.N-I
chi
a

N
.y
a,
CL
N
-a
C
m
0
a
.c
IA
w
'a
ar
c
m
a
N
N
^
N
N
tD
Ln
Ln
ri
r I
Q1
.--i
c 1
em-I
N
M
Ln
Ln
N
M
M
�
M
N
ri
N
N
N
I�
Q1
m
N
M
N
Ol
u1
.--I
c-I
e-I
r I
N
N
,m-I
00
N
I�
ri
01
N
N
ri
�p
I
M
00
Ln
ri
m
W
N
M
N
M
ri
M
l0
111
.M-4
I
N
N
r-I
N
r-I
111
m
.--I
N
Ln
ri
rd
N
M
m
e-i
N
rn
E
ri
r I
M
c-I
N
W
r-I
N
ri
r 4
.-I
Ln
�Y
N
m
N
m
r'I
C)
M
M
vi
�+
O
e•-i
-1
L1'1
c-I
N
c-I
ri
I,
t\
u'1
m
ri
�--I
1l
a
a
E
O C
N
ri
Ln
a,
ri
N
N
r'I
a,
N
ri
a-'i
M
r,
N
r14
r-I
Ln
N
^
M
l0
m
Ln
M
~ L^
a
E
L
t
O
C
0
�,
O
a)
O
'o
Y
(Y6
in
Y
O
t9
0
0
E
a)
Z
7
c
0 0
E c
3
0
E
N
cv
Q
m
N
`c
O
O
m
O
sY
O-
3
3
0 v
E
E
C
o
o
O
+,
E O
o
E
c0
c
a
v�
N
a
O
v
u
O
y
Z
O
�c
E a)
E
z
o
L
a 0-
N
o`n
3
v,
3
t
O
o
E
co
3
)
—
3
u
O -p
u w
v
E
3
`E°
3
a
V)
0
V)
V)
a
C3
c
a
°
a
c
a
a
k o
a
o
�,
c
a
c
Z
a
a
..°
a
p
a,
a,
a
a
o
u
a
a=
.p
,p
Q
zs
i
a
O
O
in
U
C
^
a
.p
p1
p
p
O
aJ
a
a�
°
N
CL
(A
t v
tn
O
L l
O
O
CI
i
v
L
u
N
i
i
Q
u
�^
3
U
U p
i
4
a
p
�
C7
3
aJ
v1
O
O
a
�
Ln

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site
Year 4 (201 1) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
HA �
No photo available
Florence & Hutcheson Appendices
CONSULTING ENGJ14EERS

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site
Year 4 (2011) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
(continued)
fo) fl, -A Ll0 1
1A Florence & Hutcheson Appendices
c 0N3ULU*,4u ENGINEERS

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site
Year 4 (2011) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
(continued)
'Plot 15
Florence & Hutcheson Appendices
CONSULTINU ENGINEBFS

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX B
GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA
1. Tables 131 -135. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
2. Cross - section Plots and Tables
3. Longitudinal Profile Plots
FloHutcheson Appendices
CO n oe Hut
'��14............ _
Bess

L
C
J
0
0
o
a
o
C
Q
Q
=
v
o
0
o
a
o
0
o
a
o
a
a
o
0
o
e
z
z
z
z
z
z
w
L V p
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
—
o
a
� .0
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
Q
E d h y
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
z
z
C
O
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
C
6
'C ^J
R
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
¢
N
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
¢
¢
Q
¢
¢
f%] 7 w C
——
—
_
z
—'
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
s
o
on
c
W
cs
3
ti
�
•�
�
O
.0
p
Op
•�
�
eL
O
.O
A
h
c
L
1
CC
G
J
y=
_
v
�
U
or
4
_
iay
� w
C
.Rn
y
��
''
'D
�
�
3
d
•cJ0
c0
. �
• �
�
L
CC
�
7
G
C'
yJ
O
C
TJ
O
>
C
cC
F
O
3
O
G
'O
:�
O
G.
�
pp
C•
y
v,
y
R�
d
-O
p'
C
'C
OA
o
u
.0
I.Q
1�.
I�Z.
.29
7a
y
U
O
,y
i
�•"
R
G,
C
U
'U ,�
�
"
�
3
Q
O
O
Q
�
c7
U �
¢
w
Q
u.
rs.
ry
Rj
N
rr1
'7
V
N
M
N
N
r;
7
N U
N
M.4
N
'o
r7 ice.
o
:C
7
9
C.
F"
L
M
m
CC L
a

d L
L C R
O
O
O
O
O
r
1
Q
Q
� a �
,C C
e w C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
z
Q
z
d
z
d
z
Q
z
Q
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
4 �
L
E v y
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
O
z
z
0
O
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z °
d
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
r �
C
bA�
0 E w
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Q
o
o
Q
Q
Q
Q
d
Q
Q
Q
Q
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
s z L ^
d
R
R
y
0
aq
on
[
—
Cd
R
3
y
C'.
o
o
,o
Ofi
M
d
C
i
N
Cc
C
bA
>
CC
O
V
N
00
C
E
-C
U
J
N
U
b
O
.N
a
A
y
�
R
o
o
�,
c
o
3
❑
D
M
N
>-
bA
U
CJ
_ CO
CJ
CO
_
t.
°a�°
�
N
�...
�,
_°
v
o
a�
c
c
o
o
a
oo
v
o°
.�
o
O
C
O
C
�
y
N
A
T
�
R
�
�..i
N
O
W
c3
E
•-
•C.+•
N
U—
^
n
G
.yL`
h
^
N
�
. y
U
cd
�
'U.,
� P•
j
O
L
R
U
O
4.
O
bq
C
.�+
U
d
w
i
d
a
u
❑.
G^
N
M
7
v1
^
N
M
-•
N
N
M
7^
U^
^
N
�'1
7—
N
H
i �
d
L
o
�
N
R
d
u
y
9
h
3
L
w
O
R
d
9
C
O
R
CC L
R
E'+ C
[i
d
W
U
C
Gzl
Gti
V

L L
L E o R
e
o
o
e
v
o
0
e
Q
a
,C C
o
0
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
Q
Q
Q
Q
O
O
z
z
z
z
o
0
Y
L
ci
L R Y
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q�j
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
G H Y
z
z
z
Z
F
z
z
z
z
y
Z
Z
O
z
z
i
o
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z O
d
R .0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
z
00
00
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
N
F7
C
bD 'O
^y L C d
y
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
O
V1 7 4.
00
00
OC
00
DD
00
00
00
00
00
00
z
00
a0
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
N
.C.i
� Z L
d
CL R
R
y
O
OA
C•
C.
c
C
'�
�
y
G
co
3
�'
r-)'r
c
.2
c2
v
Vl
�D
(LC
1
O
�
�
�
c •
n
C
W
m
.D
u
�
y
y
cj
w
i
=
C
C
C
R
o
�
O
c:.
ma�y-+•
.y.
L
�
V�
�...
r
�
(d
6
v
u y
ou
rs
a=
v
o
a
R
c
cu
=
a
o`n
o4
i
c
ti
U
O
y
�
y
ca
b
O0.
G
i.
��
d
R
cC
n
�•.'
R
�
y
y
L
N
y
y
�
^
�'
.,_,
�
cC
4.
bA
M
N
F
'c
3
n
c
co 04
•_
y
c°
on
y
y
o
L
.y
i
�
c
U
v
�'"
7
c
y
r3.
•/�
G.
O
U
i
C
L
L
O
0
cS
/O�
/7�
Iy^
Y
rU-
�
G
—�
N
r�
�
vi
�
N
M
—
N
N
rn
�
--
U
•--
�
N
M
'T
�
N
�a
N
�s
d
•a
C
R
R
as
m
>
3

� L
C
¢
Lti y G
C p
e R C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0¢
z
Q¢¢
z
z
z
0
0
w
L '✓� O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
a U
L �
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z°
z
z
o
0
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
z =
F=
h
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
h
h
z
r
r
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
C
i C y
Vi
h
h
r
h
r
r
r
r
r
r
h
z
h
h
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
•--
a a
1.
c''
o
c
�
.L
�
c
-
3
CC
C
r
E
O
'j
No
5
s
O
Vi
Op
�
1
C
C
.�
�
�
�
•.
n
m
C
C
0
7
ooyo
ti
o
v
o
y
n
.r
44.1
O
75
O
O
'^
o4
^
4%
L
O.
U
iz
0
I
c'.
Z
o
L
av
0
3=
s
to
cn
WD ::
- o
'U
'•-
h
p
0
3
'7
0
o
N
U
C
w.,
o
a
O
o n
cL•
�•
v
0
on
o
w
o
v
n
.•c5 0.
U
R
.
y
U
z
«o bc
14
coC z
o
J
C
A
U
L
U 7
L
v
❑M
Cr
L
Gro
.
c
N
'7
N—
N
7 14
7—
N
�a
L
�
R
�
to
C
OL
yam..
C
cd
y
'O
C
C
R
CC
F
L
cm
i
CC L
R
0.
0.

L L
=
Q
o.
CQ C
z
z
z
z
O
C
y0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
0
0
0
O
O
y V
_
L M
d
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z°
z
z°
°°
z
z
z
z
z
z
7 W = •/
z =
_ d
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
F=
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z-
_
OD 'O
^y L C a+
N
N
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
Y
4 c"a
v
0
an
c
on
q
=
o
C
bA
t.
C
C •
r,.•-
O
O
,G
Qm
S
QM
C
i
�
m
O
'11
v
C
(n
L
U
bA
j
_�
C
cl
C
_
cz
.-
C
L
w
M
�,
'O
p
p
.p
op
O
y
'C
Co
°
cu
v
U
O-0
C
C
p
cu
n
°
°
N
A.-
p
7
ro
c
-
cz
v
C•
p
c'
b
ca
C
p
3
ai ci
v
U
R
n
a
R
cJ
ca
W
a
s
b0
DO
t8t,
a
cJ
o
L
C-L
°
w
=
D
y
o
c
s
o
v
v
a
a
o
R
O
aL,
ti
C
a
8
'_'
v
v
c
c
U
m
a
c
C.
°Q
�_
�.
c
o
o
s
u
y
c_
F
v
o
L[
a
o
a
c
v
i
°o
C
co
i-�
a=i
aoi
a
n
L^
N
M
7
�
-P-
N
M
—
N
N
M
4
_
U
—
N
m
It
'Q
ca
F' CCi
"
Q
W
U
C
W
s
V

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Bmun Marsh
Reach I - XS 17
Riffle
10 /1 /I1
Corbin Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
4.7
4.9
6.2
2008
1008
2009
2010
2011
Aa built Survey
YR I Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR 3
Survey
YR 4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
-6.9
138.2
26.1
135.6
26.5
135.7
26.0
135.6
25.8
135.7
-1.2
136.1
17.9
135.6
21.5
135.7
18.0
135.7
20.4
135.7
8.4
135.7
15.5
135.4
16.5
135.7
12.5
134.6
16.9
135.7
11.3
134.4
14.2
135.2
14.8
135.4
11.5
134.4
14.8
135.4
12.3
134.3
12.9
134.5
13.5
134.8
8.0
135.7
13.1
134.9
15.3
135.4
12.4
134.3
12.4
134.5
0.0
136.1
12.6
134.6
15.5
135.4
11.4
134.4
11.7
134.4
11.9
134.5
31.9
135.4
10.7
134.8
10.7
134.9
11.4
134.6
40.5
1372
9.5
135.4
9.5
1354
10.2
135.2
8.4
135.7
8.6
135,7
82
135.8
2.7
135.7
4.5
135.7
3.9
135.7
0.0
136.1
0.0
136.1
2.1
135.8
0.0
136.1
140.0
139.0
138.0
137.0
ti
a
a
136.0
w
135.0
Y
O
134.0
a
Y
19 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0
Photo of CrossSection RI -17- Looking Downstream Q. STA 13+60
Brown Marsh Reach 1 - XS 17 Rife
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
4.7
4.9
6.2
4.5
Width
SA
7.8
9.8
8.5
Mean Depth
0.5
0.6
1
0.6
1
0.5
!11as Depth
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
N %/D
16.2
12.6
15.5
15.9
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) --Year 3 (2010) -Year 4 (2011)

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Brown Marsh
Reach I -XS 18
Pool
10 /1 /11
Corbin. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
7.7
6.9
7.8
2008
2008
2009
2010
2011
As -built Survey
YR I Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR 3
Survey
YR 4
Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
-6.7
135.9
0.0
135.9
0.0
135.9
0.0
136.0
0.0
135.9
14.2
135.9
9.2
135.8
6.0
135.8
13.0
136.0
6.8
135.8
17.0
134.2
12.4
136.0
13.8
135.9
17.0
134.5
13.8
136.0
18.7
133.9
14.2
135.8
15.0
135.4
18.0
134.4
16.0
135.1
18.8
133.9
15.7
135.1
15.9
135.0
19.0
134.6
17.1
134.4
28.4
135.9
16.5
134.6
17.1
134.5
22.0
136.0
18.2
134.4
34.3
138.4
17.3
133.9
17.9
134.3
28.3
136.2
19.0
134.5
18.4
133.7
19.0
134.5
19.9
135.1
18.8
134.0
20.8
135.6
21.9
135.9
19.3
134.4
22.0
135.9
25.3
135.9
20.8
135.6
26.0
135.8
28.4
136.1
21.6
135.9
28.9
136.1
26.1
135.8
28.5
136.1
roses Se *0
Brown Marsh eac 1- A Pool
Photo of Cross - Section RI -18 - Looking Downstream rl STA 12 +45
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
7.7
6.9
7.8
7 0
Width
7.0
82
8.R
8 0
Mean Depth
1.1
0.8
0.9
1
nv
Ma: Depth
2.1
1.6
L6
1 G
/D
NA
NA
NA
NA

Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Dee
Crew
Brown Marsh
Itcach I - XS 19
Riffle
10 /1/11
Corbin, Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
4.3
3.8
3.8
2008
-
2008
2009
7.2
2010
2010
As -built Survey
YR I
Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR 4
Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
-4.6
137.9
0.0
136.6
OA
136.6
OA
136.5
0.0
136.5
-0.5
136.2
2.6
136.1
6.0
136.2
7.0
136.3
22
136.1
7.7
136.0
7.4
136.2
7.6
136.2
10.0
135.3
4.1
135.9
10.0
134.9
8.6
135.7
8.4
136.0
12.0
135.1
7.5
136.2
11A
134.9
9.5
135.6
9.2
135.8
I5o
136.0
8.9
135.8
14.6
136.3
103
135.0
10.0
135.4
23.0
136.1
10.7
135.2
20.5
1363
114
134.9
10.7
135.1
t
11.6
135.0
29.8
139.6
12.8
135.1
11.4
135.1
12.7
135.2
13.5
135.4
12.5
135.2
14.1
135.8
14.7
136.0
13.3
135.5
15.6
136.0
15.9
136.0
14.0
135.9
20.3
135.9
19.9
136.0
15.3
136.1
216
136.1
22.3
136.1
18.0
136.1
22.4
136.1
Photo of Cross - Section RI -19- Looking Downstream Via), STA 10+72
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
4.3
3.8
3.8
3.6
-
Width
6.7
7.2
7.2
1
7.7
-- -- - -
Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
Mu Depth
LI
1.0
0.9
0.9
/D
10.4
13.6
13.7
16.3
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 1- XS 19 Riffle
140.0
-
139.0
-- -- - -
138.0
- - -
Bankfull Elev.
137.0
- - (approx.) - -
_
136.0
L
a
135.0
moae77
w
134.0
w
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance feet
t
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) - *-Year 3 (2010) -e-Year 4 (2011)

Project Name
Cron Sew.
Feature
Date
Crew
13- Mmah
Reach I - XS 20
Pool
10/1/11
Cotb.. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
6.2
5 4
2009
20115
2009
6.9
2010
0
2011
A.baik Sarver
YR 1 Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elnatioo
Station Ekvsdm
Station Ekvadm
-85
1392
0 0
1362
00
136.2
t10
1363
0.0
136.3
41.7
136.5
27
136.2
5 0
136.1
9.0
136.2
50
136.1
81
136.4
8.2
136.5
8.4
1361
12.5
134.8
7.4
136.3
11.4
134.9
93
136.3
9.5
136.1
13.5
1346
8.8
136.2
13.6
134.9
10.0
135.9
11.0
135.5
14.0
134.8
10.7
135.6
15.9
136.3
11.4
135.2
12.2
134.9
17.0
136.1
11.8
134.9
23.6
136.5
12.4
134.4
12.9
134.7
24.0
1364
12.3
134.7
28.5
138.2
116
134.2
136
134.5
14.0
134.8
14.6
1353
14A
134.7
14.5
135.0
15.9
136.2
15.5
135.7
16.2
136.1
16.7
1361
166
136.0
202
136.1
22.3
1363
17.0
136.0
22.7
136.2
23.7
136.5
200
136.0
23.8
136.4
254
1364
140.0
139.0
138.0
137.0
R
L
L
136.0
a
135.0
a
°- 134.0
i d
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0
Brown Marsh Reach 1 - YS 20 Pool
Phob of CmsaSeetion RI -20 - Lookia8 Dowastre.m a STA 10-52
Are.
21818
2009
2010
2011
2012
6.2
5 4
8
Width
6.2
6.9
0
Me.o Depth
IA
0.8
d7.87
8
Ma Depth
1.9
1 5
4
W/D
NA
NA
4
Baokfull Elev.
(apprD><.)
Distance (feet)
-As bulk Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -Year 3 (2010) -Year 4 (2011)

Project Name
Croaa Seetlon
Feature
Date
Cren
Rroxn Marsh
Reach 2 - XS 13
Pool
10 /1 /11
Corbin. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.3
20.1
21.6
NNW
2008
2009
12.5
2010
11.9
2011
Aa built Survey
YR 1 Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Ek-tkn
Station
Ekvatko
Station Elevation
Station Ekysdon
-105
138.7
00
1356
00
135.5
0.0
1355
00
135.5
417
135.7
6.7
135.6
5.0
135.2
7.0
135.3
3.6
135.2
6.7
135.5
9.8
133.7
6.7
135.2
13.0
132.3
7.1
135.3
10.9
133.1
11.8
132.7
8.0
134.7
14.5
132.2
9.3
134.2
12.9
132.4
12.2
132.2
9.2
133.9
20.0
135.3
11.3
1311
14.7
1329
13.4
1321
103
133.3
26.0
135.6
124
1324
18.1
1353
14.2
132.2
11.7
132.7
I5.0
1321
254
1357
15.6
132.9
12A
132.4
153
132.9
33.2
138.5
163
1317
13.6
132.2
16.0
133.7
18.4
1350
14.7
132.3
17.6
134.6
20.4
135.4
16.3
133.7
19.1
135.3
26.1
1356
18.0
134.7
22.7
135.2
193
135.2
251
135.5
22.0
135.1
260
135.6
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
a
136.0
a
135.0
c 134.0
a.
133.0
132.0
131.0
Phot�i of Crwr- Seetioo R' -13- Luolun¢ Du..nrtreero a STA 47 +45
.Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.3
20.1
21.6
198
Width
12.9
12.5
13.0
11.9
Mean Depth
l 7
1,6
17
1.7
Ma: Depth
31
30
30
3.2
W/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 13 Pool
130.0 4-
0.0
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
I
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey - M-2010 Survey +Year 4 (2011)

Projeet Name
Cren Section
Peamrc
Date
Crew
Bmwn Marsh
Reach 2 - XS 14
Riffle
10 /1/I1
Corbin, Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
14.1
12.8
13.3
2008
- - -- -
Width
2008
10.9
2009
10.0
2010
Mean Depth
2011
Aa-built Sun ey
YR
1 Sunray
YR 2 Survey
YR 3 Survey
YR 4 San'ey
Station
Elevation
Station
Ekwatiun
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
■Jnadon
-9.2
138.5
0.0
135.6
0.0
135.6
0.0
135.7
0.1
135.6
41.8
135.5
5.7
135.3
5.0
135.4
6.0
135.3
3.7
135.5
6.7
135.2
7.6
134.6
6.2
135.3
10.5
133.2
5.9
135.4
10.9
133.0
10.0
133.2
7.5
134.7
12.0
133.1
8.0
134.4
12.7
133.1
10.7
133.0
8.8
133.9
17.0
135.3
9.6
133.7
17.0
135.4
12.2
133.0
10.0
133.5
23.5
135.7
9.8
133.2
22.9
135,6
14.6
134.3
10.6
133.0
10.6
133.0
34.8
139.0
17.0
135.5
11.2
133.0
11.6
133.2
23.7
135.5
12.2
133.1
12.1
133.5
23.7
135.4
12.6
133.3
14.2
134.5
13.5
133.8
16.0
135.3
15.0
134.6
20.1
1354
17.1
133.3
22.9
135.7
20.0
135.3
24.0
135.8
Photo of C ro+e- Section RZ-14 - LaoM&g Downstream !ig STA 47+48
Area
2000
2009
2010
2011
2012
14.1
12.8
13.3
11.6
- - -- -
Width
10.9
10.9
10.9
10.0
Mean Depth
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
(approx.)
Ma: Depth
2.1
2.3
2.2
2.3
111 D
8.4
9.2
8.9
8.7
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 14 Riffle
140.0
- - - --
139.0
- - -- -
138.0
- - - - -
137.0
Bankfull Elec.
(approx.)
z
136.0
- - --
w
135.0
134.0
w
133.0
�I
132.0
i
131.0
-
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
25
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey - «F2010 Survey +2011 Survey

Project Nose
Cron Section
Front
Date
Crex
Btoxn Mush
Re-h2-XS 15
Pool
10/1/11
Cotbiu. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
20.0
20.1
19A
2008
2018
2009
11.4
2010
10.9
2011
A. -built Sorvey
YR 1 Survey
YR 2 Sunev
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
EInation
Station
Ewell-
Stotloe Elevation
Station Elnation
-13.6
1392
00
135.3
-0 8
135.5
0.0
135.3
0.0
1353
-1.4
1351
4.8
1353
4.2
135.3
7.0
135,0
4.6
1341
5.4
135.1
6.5
134.9
6.0
135.1
10.0
132.4
6.8
134.9
8.1
132.7
7.6
133.7
7.7
134.0
12.5
1323
8.1
133.7
10.3
131.7
8.7
132.8
8.4
1333
14.0
132.6
3.7
133.0
12.1
132.6
96
132.3
92
1324
190
1350
9.9
1313
16.7
135.0
10.2
131.7
ILO 0
131.8
26 5
135.4
113
132.1
254
135.4
11.2
131.9
13.0
1315
121
132.0
337
138.8
12.8
132.3
118
1334
13.2
1325
14.5
133.6
15.2
1342
14.5
133.2
16.7
135.1
16.2
134.6
149
134.2
259
135.6
17.4
135.1
17.7
135.0
21.2
135.1
217
135.0
25.9
135.6
259
135.4
Photo of Cm- Section R2 -15 - L mki,c Dow n -tream u STA 51H75
.Area
2000
2009
2010
2011
2012
20.0
20.1
19A
18.9
Width
10.9
11.4
11.0
10.9
M- Depth
1.8
1.8
1 7
1.7
(app -)
Mat Depth
3.3
34
2.7
2.9
AVID
NA
NA
NA
NA
-
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 15 Pool
140.0
139.0
-
138.0
_ 137.0
Bankfull Elev.
(app -)
136.0
a
- --
135.0
w.
a 134.0
-
133.0
132.0
131.0
-
130.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
AS built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey -8-2010 Survey -2011 Survey

Project Name
Crov Section
Feemet
Date
Crew
B-n Marsh
Reach 2 - XS 16
Rink
10 /1 111
Corbin. Smith
1 2009
2010
2011
1 2012
14.4
13.9
14.5
2008
Width
2008
12.0
2009
10.3
2010
Mean Depth
2011
AsMDt Sarvtr
YR I
Sun cy
YR 2 Survey
YR 3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elrvation
Station
Eevaton
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
El -tion
42.3
138.4
0,0
135.3
0.0
1352
0.0
135.2
0.3
135.2
-1.1
133.1
6 9
135.1
5A
135.0
7.0
135.0
5.0
135.0
7.0
135.0
8.1
134.8
7.3
135.0
12.0
132.7
8.0
134.9
11.6
132.8
9.9
133.9
8.7
134.3
13.0
132.7
9.9
134.1
13.4
132.7
11.1
133.1
10.5
133,5
19.0
134.9
11.4
133.4
18.1
135.1
11.9
132.8
11.7
132.6
26.0
135.1
12.1
132.9
25.4
135.3
12.5
132.7
12.7
132.5
12.9
132.5
34.6
139.0
14.2
132.7
13.5
132.8
13.8
132.6
144
133.2
15.7
133.8
14.9
133.2
16.1
133.8
17.0
134.6
16.8
134.1
18.2
135.0
19.5
134.9
18.4
134.9
19.9
135.1
26.3
135.1
22.8
134.9
26.8
135.1
26.2
135.1
140.0
139.0
138.0
137.0
136.0
f
a
135.0
w
a 134.0
m
Y
W 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Brown Marsh Reach 2 - XS 16 Riffle
Photo of Crou,3atlon R2 -16 - Loolua8 Downstream f0_ STA 52+02
Arc.
2000
1 2009
2010
2011
1 2012
14.4
13.9
14.5
Ill
Width
10.8
12.0
11.9
10.3
Mean Depth
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.3
Max Depth
2.3
2.4
2.3
2.4
IN /D
8.1
10.4
9.7
841
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -2008 Survey -2009 Survey -o -2010 Survey +2011 Survey

Project ]Name
Cron Settle.
Femare
Dm
C-
B- Marsh
Reach 3 - XS 9
Rdn.
WWII
Cotb- Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
14.8
13.1
133
2008
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) - r1-Yar 3 (2010)
20181
21109
11.6
2010
10.7
2011
A.bWk Server
YR 1 Sarvev
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Ekyatlou
Station Elevtlen
.9.1
1393
00
1360
SD
1357
00
136.1
nA
1361
-0.2
136.4
5.6
136.0
74
135.6
70
135.7
4.8
135.8
7.2
136.0
8.7
135.0
9.5
134.8
11.5
133.7
6.9
135.7
11.9
133.7
10,6
134.5
11.0
134.1
13.0
133.4
8.0
1351
13.7
133.8
12.1
133.5
11.8
133.7
15.0
134.1
9.8
134.4
18.6
135.9
140
1337
126
133.5
19.0
135.5
10.9
1336
25.1
1361
15.4
1341
140
133.5
25.5
135.8
111
1334
36.5
139.7
18.6
135.8
155
134.2
12.8
1336
22.3
1359
172
135.0
14.1
134.2
250
1359
1110
135.6
16.2
134.6
125
135.6
173
135.3
257
135.9
179
1355
2L9
1356
253
1358
140.0
139.0
138.0
.. 137.0
W
136.0
a
135.0
S
t
134.0
I a
d
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 9 Riffle
Photo of Crort -Section R3-9 - Looking Duwnetream q,. STA 41 +25
Area
2005
2009
2010
2011
2012
14.8
13.1
133
12.5
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) - r1-Yar 3 (2010)
Width
12.3
11.6
11.7
10.7
Mean Depth
1.2
1.1
1 I
1
1.2
Mar Depth
23
2.1
2 I
2.2
W/D
101
10.2
104
9.1
BaD16u11 Elev.
-777
40 5.0 10.0 15.0
Distance (feet)
20.0 25
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) - r1-Yar 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)
0

Proleet Name
Cron Section
Feature
Data
Cron
Brown Marsh
Reach 3 - XS 10
Pool
10 /1 111
Corbin. Smith
21N19
22010
21111
21112
20.3
174
18.2
2008
2008
2009
11.7
2010
11.8
2011
A. -built Survey
14
YR I Survey
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
-40
1393
00
136.1
50
135.5
00
135.8
0.1
1359
2.4
136.5
4.5
135.9
8.2
1353
8.0
135.4
4.7
1315
9A
136.0
8.5
135.4
9.3
134.7
13.0
133.0
8.4
135.4
13.6
133.3
10.6
1344
11.4
133.7
14.5
132.7
10.7
134.2
15.2
132.4
11.6
1340
13.4
1323
153
132.8
12.5
133.7
16.9
1335
12.6
1336
143
1315
20.0
135.5
12.8
1331
216
135.8
14.0
1329
157
133.0
27D
135.8
13.0
132.7
29.5
136.3
14.4
1325
17.9
1343
14.3
132.7
177
139.0
14.8
132.1
19.3
135.2
15.4
1312
16.2
132.9
20.4
135.4
16.1
134.3
17.3
134.2
24.0
135.6
18.0
134.4
19.3
135.2
269
136.1
20.7
1356
21.8
1359
24.4
135.7
25.1
135.9
27.1
136.2
267
136.4
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
a
135.0
F 134.0
a
Y
w 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Phm of Cros"ection R3-10 - Luolun8 Dux nstream u STA 42 +30
Arm
2008
21N19
22010
21111
21112
20.3
174
18.2
15.4
%V,dIh
14.6
11.7
11.9
11.8
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) - «-Year 3 (2010) -Year 4 (2011)
Mean DeP1h
14
1.5
13
1.3
Nlav NPth
3.6
2.8
2.7
2.7
WID
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 10 Pool
Banldull Elev.
a ro>L)
7777
1.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) - «-Year 3 (2010) -Year 4 (2011)

Project Name
Ctoee Seetion
Feature
Data
Crew
Btouyt Minh
R-h 3 - XS I 1
Rtltle
10 /1 /11
cotbm. South
1009
2010
2011
2012
16.4
11.1
I2.7
2008
2008
2009
10.4
2010
2011
Aabt It Suney
YR 1 Suney
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Sun ey
YR 4
Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
-8.7
1399
06
1358
f)
135.9
U.0
1358
nU
1358
-0.3
136.1
6.5
135.4
50
1355
S.0
I35A
4.7
05.4
8.5
135.5
9.6
1345
7.8
135.3
12S
133.6
7.8
135.2
13.0
133.4
11.8
1331
0.0
134.9
13.5
133.3
9.5
134.6
14.5
133.5
12.6
132.9
10.3
134.3
14.5
133.6
12.0
133.7
18.9
135 5
I3. l
132 9
11.6
133.8
20.0
135.6
12.3
133.3
27.1
- 136.4
14.0
132 N
12.5
133 S
27.0
136.2
12.9
133.2
33 7
138.8
17.7
134.8
130
133.3
13.6
1333
19.5
1356
14.1
133.6
14.6
134.1
27.1
136.:
15.9
134.3
16.1
134.8
170
134.8
18.5
135.4
18.2
135.3
22.6
135.6
195
135.6
26.6
136.1
23 0
135.7
J 0
136.2
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
S
136.0
a
135.0
4
134.0
m
133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - SS 11 Riffle
Photo of C-i"eetion R3.1I - Looking Downstream 'a STA 43+75
Area
2008
1009
2010
2011
2012
16.4
11.1
I2.7
9.5
Width
12.6
10.4
11.6
10.0
Mean Depth
13
1
1.1
10
1
Mar Depth
2.5
2.1
2.1
2.0
W/D
97
98
106
10.5

Pro Jed Name Brown Marsh
Cron Section Reach 3 - XS 12
Feature Pool
Data 10 /1111
21NUi
2W8
2008
2009
2u 11
2010
2011
10.5
1 -huilt Survey
12.8
YR l Stoney
Ya 2 Survey
YR
3 Suney
YR 4 Survey
Ratbo
Elevation
Station
Ekvadon
Station
Ekvatlon
Static Ekvatloo
Station Elevation
-88
1381
00
136.0
nn
1360
00
1359
00
176-0
4.7
138.1
4.4
135.7
6.0
135.6
90
135.3
5.9
1355
.2.0
135.9
7.9
135.5
8.7
1355
12.0
1)4.3
9.1
135.3
8.2
135.6
11.8
133.8
99
135.1
14.5
133.2
11.6
134.3
12.3
133.1
13.1
133.3
1 L6
134.5
16.0
133.1
12.3
133.9
14.7
133.2
13.7
132 6
130
134.0
16.5
133 2
13.2
133.2
19.9
1356
150
132.6
145
133.2
20.0
135.4
14.3
133.0
28.1
136.0
15.9
132.8
I5 6
133.0
30.5
136.0
16.9
133.4
35.5
138.6
16.7
133 5
16.4
133 -3
17.7
134.2
19.9
135 5
17 9
134.2
19.2
135.2
25.6
135.6
19.3
135.2
25.1
135.4
30.0
1357
21 0
135.5
29.5
135.9
2J 0
135.5
n l
135.9
140.0
139.0
138.0
_ 137.0
136.0
a
' 135.0
E
e 134.0
a
a
f 133.0
132.0
131.0
130.0
0.0
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 3 - XS 12 Pool
Photo of Cms,Section 83-12 - Looking Downstream a STA 45 +05
.Arta
2W8
2009
2010
2u 11
2012
18.6
10.5
13.7
12.8
Width
12.0
9.3
IO.R
10.0
Mean Depth
L6
1 -I
L3
1 -3
Mac Depth
2.9
2.1
2.2
2.2
W/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) Year 2 (2009) -I* -Year 3 (2010) +Year 4

Project Name
Crave Section
Feature
D.te
Crew
Brown Munk
Reach 4 - XS 5
Pool
10 1I /II
Catbm. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
19.0
15.1
15.7
2009
Whf1h
2008
2009
11.3
2010
2011
A.buW Survey
YR
I Suney
YR 2 Survey
YR
3 Saner
YR
4 Survey
Satko
Elevation
Satlon Ekyalbo
Stab-
Ekvatlou
Std- Ek-d-
Satlou EI-doa
-7.5
1404
01)
138.4
254
138.4
11.0
1383
257
1384
46
138.5
6A
1380
21.4
138.3
6.0
137.8
19.6
138.2
5.6
138.0
8.4
137.1
18.5
138.2
9.5
136,6
16.8
138.1
10.7
135.6
10.4
136.2
17 2
1376
12.0
135.4
15.8
136.8
14.0
135.5
11.8
135.5
16.0
136.5
13.0
135.2
15.0
135.6
18.1
138.4
12,6
134.9
15,1
1356
14.0
135.2
13.9
135.2
23.8
138A
134
134.8
14.6
1353
15.5
1363
110
1354
31.3
140.9
14.5
135.1
13.9
135.3
17.8
138.1
10.1
136.3
15.8
136.2
12.3
135.8
25.0
1394
7.0
137.8
161
137.4
10.4
1366
0.0
138.3
18.1
138.3
8.4
137.2
25.0
138.4
6.6
1379
38
1381,
00
138.4
I.
a
t
a
0
Z
a
a
Y
W
143.0
142.0
141.0
140.0
139.0
138.0
137.0
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cm.e Section R4 -X5 - Looking Dowutnas Q STA 20+55
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
19.0
15.1
15.7
15.0
Whf1h
11.1
11.2
11.3
9.5
Mean Depth
17
1.4
14
I
L6
I
Mao Depth
3.2
2.6
2.6
2.6
W/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - XS 5 Pool
BabfuB Vev.
I
i
1.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) Year 2 (2009) - Year3 (2010) +Year 4 (2011)

Project Name
Crme Section
Feature
Date
Crew
Browm Marsh
R=h 4 -XS6
RiBle
10 11 /II
Cotbm. S-th
2009
2010
2011
2012
13.9
13.2
12.2
2000
2008
11.3
2009
10.2
2010
2011
Afbuilt Survey
YR 1 So-y
YR
2 Survey
YR
3 Sunray
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Met ation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Eleyatlen
-8 5
1408
00
138.1
00
138.2
00
138.2
00
138.1
u 5
138.3
6.6
137.8
5.0
137.8
7.0
137.7
4.3
137.8
70
137.9
9.0
1369
6.8
137.8
9.5
136.5
6.8
137.8
11.5
135.7
10.9
136.1
x.1
137.1
11.5
135.5
9.3
136.3
13.5
135.7
11.8
1354
9.5
136.5
12.0
135.4
10.8
135.6
18.2
137.7
134
1354
10.9
1353
13.0
135.5
123
135.3
231
138.0
141
136 3
11 5
135.4
16.0
136.9
113
135.6
33.9
140.5
16.5
1371
129
135.5
17.5
13T6
151
136.7
18.2
137.9
14.2
136.2
25.0
138.2
18.2
137.7
221.7
138.0
16.5
137.2
20.9
137.8
24.7
1381
1x.5
137.7
24.7
138.3
220
137.8
249
138.3
Photo of C. Section R4-6 - L-Wag Downstream a, STA 21 +80
.Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
13.9
13.2
12.2
150
Width
11.3
11.5
10.2
11.4
Mean Depth
1.2
LI
1.2
1
13
1
Mai Depth
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.4
W/D
9.1
10.1
8.3
8.6
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - XS 6 Riffle
143.0
- - -- -- - - -- -- - - - - - -- --
- -
142.0
141.0
140.0
t,
Banldull Elev.
(app -x.)
139.0
a
138.0
°e
F
137.0
a
M
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1(2008) -Year 2 (2009) -af -Year 3 (2010) -Yar 4 (2011)

Project Name
C-. Sartkn
Feature
Date
R - Marsh
R- h4 -XS7
Pool
10 /1 111
Corbm. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.8
18.9
20.2
2009
2003
2009
12.9
2010
12.1
2011
,.built Survey
1.6
YR 1
S.-y
YR 2
Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
St...
Elation
Statka
EWatko
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station EW-tka
-95
140.7
0.0
1350
28S
137.9
u u
1379
27 6
137.7
0.4
138.1
3.9
137.7
21.8
137.6
7.5
137.5
22.7
1315
7.7
137.7
7.1
1377
20.4
137.6
123
134.8
19.8
137.4
12.1
134.9
9.2
136o
I9.5
136.9
13.5
134.7
17.8
136.2
14.9
134.7
114
135o
17.3
136.2
15.0
134.9
15.0
135.4
20.9
1375
11.9
1332
158
135.5
18.0
136.4
13.8
134.8
28.7
137.7
12.2
1346
150
1351
20.8
1374
11.6
1333
38.8
14D 4
13.0
1345
13.7
134.9
29.0
1373
9.4
136.5
14.5
1344
12.3
135.0
7.5
137.5
15.1
1351
111
135.7
2.9
137.6
153
1356
9.3
136.9
0.0
137.9
18.3
1366
721
137.7
20.9
1376
IN
137.8
282
1376
n0
1380
143.0
142.0
141.0
_ 140.0
3 139.0
w
138.0
M
r 137.0
a
W 136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 4 - XS 7 Pool
Photo of Cru..Section R4-7 - Looking Dowastmam *, STA 22 +95
Area
2818
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.8
18.9
20.2
17.3
Width
13.6
12.9
13.2
12.1
Mean Depth
1.6
I.5
IS
14
I
Maa Depth
3.2
2.7
2.7
2.5
W/D
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Distance (feet)
BAs built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) - Yesr 3 (2010) amYea r 4 (20011 1)

I p" q-1N... Brown Manh
Crone Section Rwch 4 - XS 8
Feature Ri tle
Date 10/1/11
2008
..vmtm
2005
20"
2011
2010
11.1
2011
As-a h M Snney
YR i Suney
YR 2 Suney
YR
3 Sunny
YR
4 Suney
Station
Elevation
Station
Ekyation
Staion
Elevation
Station Ek -tioo
Stadnn Ekyatka
-110
1403
00
1374
-12
137.6
00
137.7
-11
137.8
�.1
137.6
46
1374
2.8
137.3
5.0
137.7
2.0
1 17.3
5.2
137.5
7.8
136.6
4.4
137.3
60
137.0
5.2
137.3
9.6
U5.4
8.8
135.7
5.9
137.0
SA
136.0
8.0
1359
11.3
175.4
9.8
135.2
7.8
136.2
10.0
135.2
9.6
115.2
IG.3
137.6
10.9
1352
9.2
135.5
10.5
135.1
9.9
135.1
22.1
U76
117
1359
9.9
135.1
11.0
135.31
10.7
135.1
309
140.5
14.5
137 1
l LO
135.1
15.5
137.3
12.8
136.5
16.7
137.6
Ly.2
135.8
22.5
137.9
15.7
137.4
22.6
137.8
13.7
136.4
19.1
137.7
14.8
137.0
2-1.0
137.9
167
1374
208
137.5
72.6
137.8
Cross Section
Brown Niarsh Reach 4 - XS 8 Riffle
Photo of CrossSeclion R4-0 - Looking Dow nntmnm a Sl'A 25+811
Area
2005
2009
21110
2011
2012
11.1
12.3
12.2
ILO
Width
11.2
12.0
10.5
10.0
Mean Depth
1.0
10
1
1
Mas Depth
2.2
22
2.2
2.2
W/D
11.3
11.7
9.0
9.0

a Name Bmuv Marsh
Section Reach 5 - XS I
e Rd&
10 /1 /11
NOR
2008
20118
2010
2009
2012
2010
13.5
2011
A"uilt Survey
YR / Sunray
YR
2 Survey
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elnation
Station Elevation
Station El-fim
-7.7
141.1
00
139.5
00
1393
00
139.2
0.0
139.1
-0.4
139.3
6.5
139.1
4.5
139.1
6.0
139.0
7.7
138.9
9.0
139.0
9.3
138.7
8.0
138.9
10.5
138.6
103
138.6
14.5
137.0
11.4
137.8
9.0
138.6
13.0
1377
13.6
137.5
17.3
136.7
13.4
137.2
11.5
138.1
16.0
136.7
15.5
136.8
243
139.2
15.0
136.7
13.6
137.5
17.5
1367
16.1
136.6
31.8
139.2
16.0
136.7
153
136.9
22.0
138.5
17.2
136.8
38.9
141.7
17.0
136.7
16.5
136.6
32.5
139.1
193
137.7
19.6
1373
18.1
137.0
21.6
138.5
21.3
1385
193
137.5
24.4
138.9
243
1391
206
137.9
28.8
139.0
320
139.2
21.5
138.3
32.2
139.1
22.9
138.5
250
138.9
29.0
139.0
32.5
139.2
Photo of (7- sSeetiao RS_I - Looking Dowmlream a. STA 11 +60
Area
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
21.0
13.5
11.1
16.1
Width
17.2
13.7
11.2
16.6
Mean Depth
12
LO
1.0
1
1.0
1
Man Depth
2.4
2.0
1.8
2.3
W/D
14.2
13.9
112
171
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 5 - XS I Riffle

P.Jeat Ntrme
Cr Seetkn
Feature
DM.
Crew
B- March
Reach 5 - XS 2
Pool
10 /1 /11
Corbin. Smith
20119
2010
22011
21112
22.2
20.9
13.3
2000
2008
2009
2010
11.3
2011
:.-built Survey
Mean Depth
YR ISumey
YR 2
Survey
YR3
Survey
YR4
Survey
Station
El-M-
Statku
KI-d u
Statfo0
Ek-tio
Sbdke
96-do.
SWI o Eleyatku
1408
03)
139.1
-00
138.9
0.0
1390
0.0
1390
a� 5
139.1
7.1
138.7
7.0
138.6
95
138.6
6.5
138.6
12.1
136.6
12.1
138.5
11.3
138.5
12.5
138.6
12.4
138.4
17.3
136.3
14.3
137.7
12.5
138.5
14.8
137.5
15.2
1371
21.2
136.2
16.2
136.9
14.0
138.0
18.0
136.1
17.6
136.2
26.3
138.2
176
136.0
16.0
137.0
21.0
136.2
19.5
135.9
37.5
138.9
19.0
135.7
17.9
136.3
25.0
1380
21.1
136.2
44.8
1407
19.9
135.7
19.3
136.1
33.0
138.5
236
1324
22.9
136.8
20.4
136.0
38.0
1338
24.5
137.9
24.6
1379
22.2
136.5
28.9
138.5
27.2
138.3
23.0
137.0
33.4
139.6
29.8
138.7
25.4
137.9
373
138.8
373
1389
27.0
138.2
30.0
138.5
38.1
138.8
p�
D
a
a
0
r
a
143.0
142.0
141.0
140.0
139.0
138.0
137.0
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
Photo of Cr- ,- Sxtiun R5-2 - Looking D.%tetream u STA 13 +70
Area
2009
20119
2010
22011
21112
22.2
20.9
13.3
20.0
Width
162
17.5
11.3
16.3
Mean Depth
14
1.2
1.2
I
12
I
Mai Depth
22
2.5
1.9
25
W /D
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cross Section
Brown :Marsh Reach 5 - XS 2 Pool
Bankfufl Elev.
approx.
i.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
Distance (feet)
-As built Survey -Year 1 (2008) -Year 2 (2009) -la -Year 3 (2010) +Year 4 (2011)

P.Jeet Name
Cm. Seetlen
Featu re
Data
Craw
Brown Mash
Roach 5 - XS 3
RIM.
10/1111
Cotbw. Smith
2009
2010
2011
2012
13.6
15.4
13.9
2018
2008
2009
16.4
2010
11.6
2011
A.6wh Sutvey
YR 1 S.-y
YR 2 Survey
YR 3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Statkm
Eleratbo
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
-73
140.8
00
1390
00
1390
00
1390
0.0
139.0
-1.0
138.9
3.6
138 7
50
138.6
7.5
138.6
6.9
138.6
11.5
138.7
11.6
138.6
10.0
138.6
12.5
138.5
12.0
138.5
165
136.6
14.9
137.6
12.4
138.5
15.6
137.3
16.2
137.0
18.6
1365
16.6
136.8
14.2
1380
17.7
136A
17.6
136.2
24.2
130 7
17 7
136.3
15.9
137.5
18.5
136.4
17.7
136.2
35.8
138.7
18.6
136.3
17.5
136.5
200
136.6
19.1
136.9
42.9
140.8
204
1370
18.4
1%.3
22.0
137.4
21.0
137.2
22.1
137.7
20.4
136.9
24.5
138.5
22.4
137.7
24.2
138.6
25.3
138.1
36.5
138.7
24.0
138.4
31.1
138.7
29.0
138.5
29.9
138.5
355
138.7
36.1
138.6
35.8
138.6
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 5 - XS 3 Riffle
Photo of C,.." -ti.. Rf-3 - Looking Doweatteam ri_} STA 14+90
Area
2D08
2009
2010
2011
2012
13.6
15.4
13.9
12.1
hhh
12.0
16.4
120
11.6
Mcan Depth
1.1
0.9
1.2
10
1
hlai Dcplh
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
NV
10.6
176
103
11.2

Project name
Cr,,,,, Sertion
Feature
Date
Crew
Brown Marsh
Reach 5. XS
Pool
10 /1 1I1
Cotton. Smith
2009
2010
21111
31112
19.1
15.4
17.5
2008
Width
2008
2009
123
2010
2011
A,-built Survey
YR
1 Su-v
YR 2 Stomy
YR
3 Survey
YR
4 Survey
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Ekvatluv
Station Elevation
-74
1402
UL
1184
110
138.4
00
1384
0.0
1384
41.3
1385
59
138.4
5.0
138.2
5.0
138.2
4.5
138.2
7.1
138.2
7.4
1383
7.5
138.1
7.5
138.1
7 0
138.1
12.5
136.0
9.6
137.4
10.3
137.0
10.0
137.1
9.9
137.1
14.7
135.6
112
136.7
12.4
136.3
12.5
136.3
12.5
136.1
19.8
138 6
12.8
136.0
13.1
135.8
13.0
136.0
13.4
135.7
27.2
138.5
133
1353
14.5
135.6
141
135.6
14.2
135.6
337
1404
14.2
1354
1&0
136.3
152
1357
15.2
135.7
15.6
135.9
173
137.3
20.0
135.3
17.0
137.1
17.2
137.2
19.4
138.1
27.5
138.5
171
137.7
19.8
138.4
20.6
138.3
19.9
138.3
27.4
138.5
24.0
138.4
23.9
138.4
27S
138.5_7.2
138.5
143.0
142.0
141.0
140.0
139.0
w
' 138.0
°e 137.0
F
a
136.0
135.0
134.0
133.0
0.0
Cross Section
Brown Marsh Reach 5 - XS 4 Pool
Photo of Cross-Section 1154 - Looking Dmvaatmam STA 17 +40
Area
2008
2009
2010
21111
31112
19.1
15.4
17.5
15.9
Width
13.6
11.9
123
12.3
Moen Depth
14
1.3
1.4
1.3
I
Otac Depth
3.0
2.5
2.6
25
W1D
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.0 10.0
-As built Survey -Year 1
15.0
Distance (feet)
08) -Year 2 (2009)
20.0 25.0 30.0
-Year 3 (2010) +Year 4 (2011)

�
� E E
g z
g6sdc <aads�?
O
O
'.r
J
N
Y
�
e
a
O V1
3
I
0
i
2
a
w a
0
y
e
0
0
N
O I
N
~ 7.
7
a+
O
S
O
fe) en en
( )2a;) UOUNAala

«i�iTz
Wiz«
8=
3
n _ N
Uzi °u` m8m �7
0
c
v
u
w
I
L
7
�
I
L
Cdr
I I
o
3
I
O
N
I
y
O
O
�
�
�
O
N
I
i.
d
O
�
I
O
V
�
= I
C
�
u
Q
v
W
A
v
Z
C1
N
I
I
;
O
O
O
W
O
I
�
O
O
O
I
�
O
O
M M M M
()4a}) uoiaenal:j

W
Z
firt :; ^_
S
i
Y
O
Y
M
�
A
3
o
Ni
I
�
T
N
�
�
7
O
N
�
O
�
Y
rn
.Yni
O
�
D
�
Qop
Y
e
O
�
7
m
�
0
N
I
i
Q
M
7
rn
O
I
li
$
Y
M
�
O
Q
I
O
O
r
M
M M M M MN) M
- (1333) uoljenaj:j

S
N
u
w
7
h
V
$
w
3
N
.w
N
z
d
�
p
h
7
�
N
�
ppp
ti
N
z
V
d
O
�
Q
I
N v
O
0.
O
°
a
p
d
g
e
a
e
�
$
m
O
N
i
O
d
N
�
N
pp
O
O
N
i
Q
d
�
O
�
h
N
L
a
O
.. ..
(;a33) UOIJUAal :i

„z Z Z
F 3 =�
ate s
Y
IL
w
L
ar
8
00
3
1N
T
7
O
N
..r
Y
a
w
o
oY
=
oe
eCa
D
Y
O
N
Y
7
O
.Mr
N
Q
0
0
M ..
M M
(;aa;) QOPVAa[g

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX C
HYDROLOGY DATA
2011 Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Figure C 1. Annual Climactic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
Florence & Hutcheson Appendices
..... ........ _ ..... .... .. ........ .... . .
CONSULTING ENGINEERS

TMI
d
C�
L
4)
i+
c M
O0
Or
(� o
Q.�
E�
L
3 �
c}
s
c
3
O
ML
W
(sayaui) uoi;e;idioaJd
U U') LO
cM M N N O
9
L LOZ /OL /L L
-- — — — — — — — -- - - - - -- LLOZ/£ /LL
C
o L LOZ /LZ /O L
y
m
N L LOZ /OZ /0 L
L LOVE L/0 L
` O LLOZ /9 /OL
L LOZ /6Z/6
E O
> .a L LOZ /ZZ /6
Z w L LOZ/9 L/6
L LOZ /8/6
L LOZ /L /6
L LOZ /9Z /8
L L OZ /8 L/8
L LOZ/L L/8
L LOZ /17/8
L LOZ /8Z/L
L LOZ /LZ /L
L LOZ /bl/L
L LOZ /L /L
L LOZ/0£ /9
L LOZ/£Z /9
L LOZ /9L/9
L LOZ /6/9
L LOZ /Z /9
L LOZ /9Z/9
L LOZ /6 L/9
c L LOZ /ZL /9
9 L LOZ /9/9
N L LOZ /8Z /17
c
3 L LOZ /LZ /b
0
L LOZ/bl /b
r o N o L LOZ /L /b
w L LOZ/L£ /£
� N
L LOZ /bZ /E
� 9
- - -- - -- — — — — — — — LLOZ /L L/£
L W/O L/£
CDww."tNOww tNO wwC)N'%'ww0",-tww0
C -4 - -NN NNNcMMMeMM�
(sayaui) 19na-1 Ja;eM

N
d
7
m
L
4)
it
7
�m
c ca
�0
o r
L r
C7 0
CL C14
E�
M L
N}
s
L
m
2
c
3
0
L
m
(sayoui) uoilelid!OGJd
LO LO
M M N N O O
L LOZ/0 L/ L L
---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- LLOZ /£ /LL
L LOZ /LZ /0 L
c L LOZ /OZ /O L
0
m
L LOVE L/0 L
N L L OZ/9/0 L
a�
3 L LOZ /6Z/6
° L LOZ /ZZ /6
� C7
m c L LOZ /9 L/6
'o L LOZ /8/6
z
L LOZ/L /6
L LOZ /9Z/8
L LOZ /8 L/8
L LOZ/ L L/8
L LOZ /b /8
L LOZ /8Z /L
LLOZ/LZ/L
LLOZ/bL /L
L LOZ /UL �
L LOZ/0£ /9
L LOZ /£Z /9
L LOZ /9 L/9
L LOZ /6/9
L LOZ /Z /9
L LOZ /9Z /9
L LOZ /6 L/9
c L LOZ /Z L/9
L LOZ /9/9
rn
L LOZ /8Z /ti
.E-
3: L LOZ/LZ/V
0
L LOZ /bWb
r o " 9 L LOZ /L /b
2
R LLOZ/L£ /£
L LOZ /bZ /£
- -- - - -- - - - - - - — LLOZ /LL /£
L LOZ /O L/£
000CD�NO00CD'It NONIT(D0OONIT (D000NNrWMa"IT0WO
N - ' ' ' .. . N CV N CV N M CM CM C? M
(sa43ui) Jana JaleM

O
3
ea
C�
O
v
c
m
L
�F
NN4)
.w-W
R R
3a
�o
� N
O
v L
Q M
E
3
cn
t
c
3
O
L
m
(seLpui) uoi;e;id!DOJd
U LO LO
m M N N O O
LLOZ /0L /LL
-- ------- ----- - - - - -- LLOZ /£ /LL
L LOZ /LZ /O L
c L LOZ /OZ /O L
O
R L LOZ /£ L/0 L
m
as
L LOZ /9/0 L
3 L LOZ/6Z /6
w 0 LOZ /ZZ /6
c L LOZ /9 L/6
'o c L LOZ /8/6
z
L LOZ/L /6
L LOZ /5Z /8
L LOZ /8 L/8
L LOZ/ L L/8
L LOZ /b /8
L LOZ /8Z /L
L LOZ /LZ /L
LLOZ /bL /L r'
ea
L LOZ/L /L
L LOZ/O£ /9
L LOZ /£Z /9
L LOZ /9 L/9
L LOZ /6/9
L LOZ /Z /9
L LOZ /9Z/9
L LOZ /6 L/9
c 9 L LOZ /Z V9
L LOZ /5/9
N
a, L LOZ /8Z /17
C_
?r L LOZ /LZ /i7
O
L LOZ /V 07
t O w L LOZILIV
V 9
a ;a LLOZ/L£ /£
2N
L LOZ /tZ /£
-- - - - - -- — - - - -- LLOZ /LL/£
L LOZ /O L/£
C) w w IT C140w OvN0N ONv0w0N tww0N'TwmON�
N - - -r r NNNN(VMC?C?C? �
(sa40ui) Jana-j Ja;eM

00 m
M C
CD ° a
QUw
°Z
o
UUO
c
0
� N
u
C/1 Q
O LO
CieO
ti
C.
c*
3
0
co
to
t6
O
u
�L
L
ns
a,
r°n
I >
I �
ns
it
II �
U
a
li Q
U
L
:
Y
,
O
N
r
r
-
M
00
cn
p
r
O
'n
-
N
z
V
01
N
co
M
Cl 00
N
r
co
O
r
h
M
It
M
M
p
N
M
O
N
M
ti
O
M
O
O
r
N
00
�'
N
I
Cl
N
r
Q
N
O
r
M
M
M
.-
r
V
r•
7
r
0
•t
<t
6
M
W
Ili
V7
0
O
�t
M
M
O
O
�t
O
N
N
r
*-
N
C
m
O
f0
O
W
K)
'Q
r
t`
Q�
M
10
10
M
W
`7
N
O
p
A
ul
y
LLl
M
-'t
to
0
10
1C1
d
m
m
W
)"
Z
M
O
M
(V
N
IN
N
N
M
C)
M
m
M
N
1D
r
m
L
N
cr
_
O
O
N
C
°
rn
d
C
O
N t
m
Z
L
O �
L m
m
J
a Y
o C
fna
C C
0 °
E E
J �
O 00 lD
(say:)ui) uoilelidi:)aJd
gad
nON
IDO
a°
L
0
jdaS
a°
L
O
Sny I
0
Alnr
0
O
aunr
Aeyy
iQ
O
Ay
N
levy
-- — — 9aj
N O
uer
ti
a�
U
O.
G.
2
G
O
U
CD N
y
v
,x a
W
U
r
C)
L J
O
IL

Contract No. D06038
Brown Marsh Swamp Restoration Site, Robeson County, North Carolina
YEAR 4 (2011) MONITORING REPORT
APPENDIX D
MONITORING PLAN VIEWS
Florence 6r Hutcheson Appendices
CONSULTING ENGINEERS

yC
it
CL
co
it

a z m
O W
r
z 3 N
m^ V O
0 W
m J� U O z
00 u
IL
W M
y� O
O 'y0 w
All
c °C
%i AhFSaJSm V pZ m � '°
1 3
D,s G a
W
N /E
o
i/
i/
i/
`1
\ o
O
W
Zf I yN CN W LL YQ • Q F
mN
MO
d
W
OK W N
O
OC V
LU
4
Z m 0 H
na-
1', i m
Lvz
N 1 1 ,' �
o, /, a3
7 t7 O L
m '
/. E
i
�/ J Z K vEi E
1 '� l 1 1 r. ❑
uEP'Z- 4aE- fiuu­-�qm Fdz

ON
W
z
o `\
G
w
z
o
a�
V
W
�3
m 3
W
00 +91'01S \\
it
0 y 00 +t1I'o�S
�i z `
v G N
u+ c7 r
N �
N
} 0 y 411,
t�
y
\
5
V
W
LL
0
6
h
x
u
�o
z�
z [O N
cd
W
� 0
00
0
Z +
Z 0
W
Ca
m
�
N
0
W
W
m
LL
O
J
u
z
a
m
00 +5/'oZ
�O
d
W
p O
if O O
v
g E E W 12 Z
O
a
z
O n c d O F
❑ •
Z
W
W o�
J G
Z G
o z
V rmr
O LL Z
U W
3 Y v 4y
i
\
\
i
r
r
� N
z
\ O
u
00 +D 'o4S \ N
u
0 /'DlS
Z
O
V
00 +1 1'o�S W
' � N
Vf
0
�orva- u,�.m��eW-swe�u

O
3t o °D
= W1 a
z m S O
31 w S'ON 133HS 33S 'N H +
e i 09 +6Z NOLLV15 -3NIlHXV-
1 ~
N _
CD
00- 1-68 7 'o�S m °�
OOfBZ'�lS
— -------- -
--------------- It v `,�' 00 +2'o1S
ui
W =l
v W 00 +zZ'o�S
F-
0
/ • • / / W;r
_W W
LL I � • � N
J C7 r I. • j n �
\ \ OO +ZZ o4J Z
O
a 1 y u
O uj
Z
Oa I I .•,- O
w r I W
O
V m j >
Z
W 3 Y V ul Z
W h ° £
Z�''
a \\
wr

c 'O
u ZO ao
c° i i OSS a. d w
I ee N °N Z m 5 0
_� w i /1bS3HS
'a _ s! U � gN/3 p �
o / 0 e an
o
1 / Z CD
CD
Q Y
m
__-- ----------- 1 OO+Lf"D!S
uo �I
c�
' I
w Z 17 { I
l7Q I { 1
m vii 1 I � I of
1 1 LL1 1 —
1 , l
00 +9f'DIS \
\`
\ 1 Z
I OK
1
VU
ce
LU
0
z ly i \
z 00 -f J
0
0 1 OO +i� ors
rn
r/
00 +zi 'ojs ;
--
- - - - -- m
11 \\
00 +1,g"o4S
m
o z u 00 +O� o�S
o LL
LU V n' K F z
W 1s Z OS* y. '/ T
WZ rc o w O i 6t ^,0N i
J m O441
1 \ W ❑ 1OP,
S I �
bb /Lt/B �6p'S- 4atl-6ui+m�uw-SWB \II Z r <� {\ m7voW\y
IqZ /\

co �°
t w'�
Y
y U
c �^
,j3 U
LL
0
Z
m
O
Z
0
Q
}
W 1JL \\
W
Q
d
Z =P
Q Vd
H
w �
W � R
O
w~
Q W
I I
0
W
W 00+zk,'��SW
I �
1
u 1`�
� 1•
a 1!
I�
W
O �
G " 1
N I 1
1 1 i
N 1 ♦
� 1 ;
U \
W
W~
O
G
W � _
Os Xl6 �N
1r yN3�s
j OO
'1S
\ \\ 1 W O
1 ♦ I H
;i 5
- -- -- - - -
W
11 ors O
1 Z
1
1
i
I
I
s`0 z
00+et, 'o!S
N
w
u
W
O
rY
d
N
th O
~
=
Z
>6
�P
O
O
/
o[ +
.p
G
W
Z w 0 O
n
G
mN
Q I ♦
i
� I
V I I
W 1JL \\
W
Q
d
Z =P
Q Vd
H
w �
W � R
O
w~
Q W
I I
0
W
W 00+zk,'��SW
I �
1
u 1`�
� 1•
a 1!
I�
W
O �
G " 1
N I 1
1 1 i
N 1 ♦
� 1 ;
U \
W
W~
O
G
W � _
Os Xl6 �N
1r yN3�s
j OO
'1S
\ \\ 1 W O
1 ♦ I H
;i 5
- -- -- - - -
W
11 ors O
1 Z
1
1
i
I
I
s`0 z
00+et, 'o!S
N
w
u
W 00
QW
Q
J
V
Q
Z m
S O _
(7 S W
Z 4 O S O
0— t
Z — _
01 a �,
< Z m
4 N
m c �
I
I
I
�
O
Z w 0 O
n
G
' /
5
m
�Z Z
2
n_
O
W 00
QW
Q
J
V
Q
Z m
S O _
(7 S W
Z 4 O S O
0— t
Z — _
01 a �,
< Z m
4 N
m c �
I
7
U Q
I Q
f O
O
O
Z w 0 O
n
G
m
�Z Z
O
W W
og
z
Z
E3 O
h Wo
�
m
k
g f
I
7
U Q
I Q

u Z °°
O w
fL
ao
LL 0
C 2
4 ae
Z d oC 'O
N
Z e c
o o = E�
LO a
W
' - ---��� in
1
E c gz a
o
x F
Z z co Pl
O N o w0 p
V- ~
z OD
❑. 1 Wo
W 0 W LU
•• �\
lC! 0 ` 1
LL W LLI
J i
a 1'
=m \
y a ` 00 +ZS"olS
Z oa z \
~
O N
W W \� 1
H N /
Z � ,! I T N
< O i 'L
00 +1s •ors / ' /
wi / _v
} o W 1 1 1
W `I Q
LL 1`
v
>0
W
' 00 +66'D�S
I Z
1 1 O
00 +R0 *D)S �x \ �,
` 1 0
u
1 1�
OSXIi
ON i I W
Np4Y r3 3N33s
�NJI
yy /(i /8 u6p•( "VId'5u�.o+�u^w'SWB \II I '��A\ � ow\

C 9
m _ Z m
UU, 0 c Q
Z m T m
i) m N OL H
5i W W
'O ZN ? w N
Zn 01 3
Y Z m
�O
/ 0 W m _
Z= e e E
OtWu
N
W
Ge 0 1 1
W p
H a0 r VI ✓✓l
w \ \ \,'�•, \\
% W
W V) W ! d
Z !
It \
d I
e
N ; ; 0 +lk�,I'o�S ,n
0
Z < W
0 = i
/' m
;\ x
0 7
rrl
� � r
0 O
00 +1 /'o!S rn E E Z Z ?
W
1\•, •.� O h cO f
W O W
JE1
/ N m >
Z i
3 —� G
3
m
a LL w
00 , 4
� �
Sto `ak a LL Y Z� W g
y
/ 1
l
\ W
1 1