20071814 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20110214

61 is
Mg C Clod ° Greek Sti°eam Restoi°afl®n
StainRy County, North Ca'roHnva
Milli Il It QY I CI. U. II U all OUR AY'1Y4➢UOI —lY
Submitted to /prepared for:
r
M
�
� r
(DIP
ash
"YAK
��4

i
1
J
i
J
J
�J
r�
J
r�
J
� J
J
,J
4,

Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ ............................... l
2.0 Project Goals, Background, & Attributes ...................................................................... ..............................2
2.1 Project Location and Description ................................................................................. ............................... 2
2.2 Restoration Summary ..................................................................................................... ..............................2
2.2.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives ................................................................................. ..............................2
2.2.2 Project Description and Restoration Approach ............................................................ ..............................3
2.2.3 Project History, Contacts, and Attribute Data .............................................................. ..............................6
3.0 Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................................... .............................10
3.1
Stream Monitoring ........................................................................................................
.............................10
3.1.1
Bankfull Events ..........................................................................................................
.............................10
3.1.2
Cross - sections .............................................................................................................
.............................10
3.1.3
Pattern .........................................................................................................................
.............................10
3.1.4
Longitudinal Profile ....................................................................................................
.............................11
3.1.5
Bed Material Analysis ................................................................................................
.............................11
3.1.6
Watershed Observations .............................................................................................
.............................11
3.1.7
Photo Reference Sites ................................................................................................
..............................1 1
3.2
Vegetation Monitoring ..................................................................................................
.............................12
3.3
Biological Monitoring ...................................................................................................
.............................12
3.4
Maintenance and Contingency Plan .............................................................................
.............................13
4.0 Monitoring Results — 2010 year 2 - monitoring data ......................................................... .............................13
4.1 Stream Data ....................................................................................................................... .............................13
4.1.1 Cross - section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results
.............................13
CrossSections ........................................................................................................................
.............................13
LongitudinalProfil e ...............................................................................................................
.............................14
4.1.2 Stream Problem Areas Plan View ..............................................................................
.............................14
4.2 Hydrology Data .................................................................................................................
.............................18
4.3 Vegetation Data .................................................................................................................
.............................18
4.3.1 Vegetative Problem Areas ..........................................................................................
.............................19
4.3.2 Vegetative Problem Area Plan View ..........................................................................
.............................19
4.4 Areas of Concern ...............................................................................................................
.............................19
5.0 References .............................................................................................................................. .............................20
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010
a

Appendices
Appendix A Figures 1 - 3
Cross - section Plots, Profile Plots, Morphological Summary Data
Appendix B (Tables 7 & 8), Stream Problem Area Photos, Figures B 1 - B 11 & Data
(Tables B.1 - B.2)
Appendix C Vegetation Data (Tables C.1 thru C.7), Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Photos, Vegetation Problem Area Photos& Figures C 1 - C 11
Appendix D As -Built Plan Sheets
Appendix E Photo Log
List of Tables
Table 1.
Project Mitigation Approach
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contact Table
Table 4.
Project Background
Table 5.
Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Table 6.
Verification of Bankfull Events
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D II
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Annual Report details the monitoring activities during the 2010 growing season on the Big Cedar Stream
Restoration Site ( "Site "). Construction of the Site, including planting of trees, was completed in February
2009. In order to document project success, 23 vegetation monitoring plots, 33 permanent cross - sections,
3,416 linear feet of longitudinal profiles, and 2 crest gauges were installed and assessed across the Site. The
2010 data represent results from the second year of vegetation and hydrologic monitoring.
Prior to restoration, the streams on the Site were channelized and riparian vegetation on the majority of the
Site was absent. The riparian vegetation that was present on much of the Site consisted of successional and
invasive species such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
After construction, it was determined that 11,103 linear feet (LF) of perennial and intermittent channel along
Big Cedar Creek (BCC) and six unnamed tributaries (UT 1, UT2, UT3, UT 1 A, UT 1 B, and UT 1 C) were
restored, 1,171 LF of Big Cedar Creek and UT1 were enhanced, and 539 LF of Big Cedar Creek and the
northern most unnamed tributary (UT2) were preserved.
The 23 monitoring plots are 10 meters by 10 meters in size were used to assess survivability of the woody
vegetation planted on Site. They are located to represent the different zones within the project as directed by
EEP monitoring guidance. The vegetation monitoring indicated a survivability range of 283 stems per acre to
971 stems per acre with an overall average of 753 stems per acre. Overall, the Site is on track for meeting the
initial vegetation survival criteria of 320 stems per acre surviving after the third growing season and the final
success criteria of 260 trees per acre by the end of year five.
In general, the majority of the project's dimension, pattern, profile and in- stream structures have remained
stable; however, areas of concern that were noted from Year 1 have worsened during Year 2. Maintenance of
these areas has been scheduled to begin in late winter /early spring of 2011. One bankfull event was observed
and documented on Big Cedar and UT 1 during Year 2.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

2.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, & ATTRIBUTES
2.1 Project Location and Description
The Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site ( "Site ") is located in Stanly County, NC (Figure 1, Appendix A)
approximately ten miles south of the City of Albemarle. The Site is part of the Yadkin River Basin within
NCDWQ sub -basin 03 -07 -14 and USGS hydrologic unit 03040105060080.
The Site is part of the Piedmont physiographic province. Medina and others describe the Piedmont as, "...
consist(ing) of generally rolling, well- rounded hills and ridges with a few hundred feet of elevation difference
between the hills and valleys" (Medina, 2004). The local geology is typical of the Carolina Slate Belt
lithotectonic province of central North Carolina, and is comprised of Proterozoic and Cambrian age siltstone,
mudstone, and mafic hypabyssal intrusive rocks according to the 1 degree by 2 degree geologic map of the
Charlotte Quadrangle prepared by the USGS (Goldsmith et al., 1988). Soil types at the site were researched
using Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) soil survey data for Stanly County, along with on -site
evaluations. The predominant soil series within the floodplain area of the site is mapped as Oakboro silt loam
series, a hydric soil.
The Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site drains predominately forested and agricultural lands, as well as a
portion of the residential and commercial district of the town of Norwood. The Winston -Salem Southbound
Railroad line parallels Big Cedar to the east, then turns to cross Big Cedar and UT1 upstream of their
confluence.
To visit the Site, take Highway 52 for approximately ten miles south, turn right onto Mount Zion Church
Road (1.25 miles south of the Town of Norwood). Follow Mount Zion Church Road for approximately 0.5
mile west to the intersection of Mount Zion Road and Big Cedar Creek. UT I, UT2, and the upstream reaches
of Big Cedar Creek can be accessed from the farm road on the north side of Mount Zion Church Road,
approximately 0.25 miles east of the intersection of the railroad and Mount Zion Church road. Reach 5 and 6
of Big Cedar Creek can be accessed from a farm field approximately 0.1 mile west of the intersection of the
railroad and Mount Zion Church road.
2.2 Restoration Summary
2.2.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives
- The specific goals for the Big Cedar Creek Site Restoration Project were as follows:
• Create geomorphically stable conditions on the Big Cedar Creek project site.
• Improve and restore hydrologic connections between the streams and their floodplains.
• Improve the water quality in the Big Cedar Creek and Rocky River watersheds.
• Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat along the project corridor.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

The primary objective of the Big Cedar Creek Restoration project was to accelerate the channel
evolutionary processes by constructing channels with geomorphically stable cross sections, increased
sinuosity, and access to the floodplain at bankfull stage. Flood attenuation, increased groundwater
infiltration, and alleviation of bank stress resulted from providing floodplain access. Water quality
improvements were made through fencing cattle out of the restored reaches and by reducing bank
erosion throughout the project site. Aquatic habitat was improved by providing geomorphically
stable habitat features and through placement of in- stream habitat structures. Invasive vegetative
species removal efforts and reforestation of the riparian buffer with native species complemented the
restoration of Big Cedar Creek, UT1, UT2, UT3, UT1A, UT1B,and UT1C. Existing native trees
were preserved onsite wherever feasible. The vegetative efforts will benefit both aquatic and
terrestrial habitat as the site matures.
2.2.2 Project Description and Restoration Approach
The project involved the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of Big Cedar Creek and six
unnamed tributaries to Big Cedar Creek. A total of 11,103 linear feet (LF) of stream channel along
Big Cedar Creek and six unnamed tributaries (UT 1, UT2, UT3, UT 1 A, UT 1B, and UT 1 C) were
restored. Additionally 1,171 LF of Enhancement II along Big Cedar Creek and UT1 and 539 LF of
preservation along Big Cedar Creek and UT2 based on the post - construction as -built survey. The Site
has a history of general agricultural usage including cattle, cotton, and corn production. Prior to
restoration, the streams on the project site were channelized and riparian vegetation on the majority of
the Site had been removed. The riparian vegetation that was present on much of the Site consisted of
successional and invasive species such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). As a result of channelization, many of the project reaches were
incised and lacked bankfull floodplain access.
For analysis and design purposes, Big Cedar Creek, UT I, and UT2 were divided into 11 reaches (As-
built Plan Sheets, Appendix D). Big Cedar Creek flows from north to south entering the Site at the
northern property line. The reaches on Big Cedar Creek were numbered sequentially from north to
south. Big Cedar Creek Reach 1 starts at the northern property line and ends at the confluence with
UT2. Big Cedar Creek Reaches 2 through 4 are located between this confluence and the Winston -
Salem Southbound Railroad line crossing. Big Cedar Creek Reach 5 begins below the railroad
crossing and continues to just upstream of Big Cedar's confluence with UT 1. Reach 6 begins where
Reach 5 ends and continues to the culvert at Mount Zion Church Road. UT flows from west to east
entering the Site at the western most property line. The reaches on UT (1 through 4) were numbered
sequentially from west to east. UT ends at its confluence with Big Cedar Creek. UT A, B, and C
are tributaries to UT1 that flow north to south entering the Site along the northern side of
conservation easement along UT1. UT1A, B, and C converge with UT1 in Reaches 4, 3, and 1
respectively. UT2 flows northwest to southeast entering the Site along the northern property line.
UT2 ends at its confluence with Big Cedar Creek., UT3 flows east to west under the Winston -Salem
Southbound Railroad line. UT3 enters the Site on the eastern side of the conservation easement along
Big Cedar Creek and ends at its confluence with Big Cedar Creek Reach 3.
A holistic restoration approach was based on the condition of the overall Site and each reach's
potential for restoration as determined during the site assessment. Design criteria for the proposed
stream concept were selected based on the range of the reference data and the desired performance of
the proposed channel. The developed design criteria were then compared to past projects built with
similar conditions. Ultimately, these sites provide the best pattern and dimension ratios because they
reflect site conditions after construction. While most reference reaches are in mature forests,
restoration sites are in floodplains with little or no mature woody vegetation. This lack of mature
woody vegetation severely alters floodplain processes and stream bank conditions. If past ratios did
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 3
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

not provide adequate stability or bedform diversity, they were not used. Conversely, if past project
ratios created stable channels with optimal bedform diversity, they were incorporated into the design.
Following the initial application of design criteria, detailed refinements were made to accommodate
the existing valley morphology and to promote natural channel adjustment following construction.
For example, old meander scars in the Big Cedar Creek floodplain were incorporated for a more
historical replication of channel alignment. The design philosophy employed at the Big Cedar Creek
site was to use conservative design parameter values based on reference reach data and lessons
learned from past projects. This allows the project to evolve in a positive direction as the permanent
vegetation becomes established.
The overall restoration approach for the Site allows stream flows larger than bankfull flows to spread
onto the floodplain, dissipating flow energies and reducing stress on streambanks. In- stream
_. structures were used throughout all reaches to control streambed grade, reduce streambank stress, and
promote bedform sequences and habitat diversity. The in- stream structures consisted of root wads,
log vanes, log weirs, cross vanes, j- hooks, and constructed riffles. The wide variety of structures was
used to promote a diversity ,of habitat features in the restored channel. Where grade control was a
consideration, constructed riffles and grade control j -hooks were installed to provide long -term
stability. Streambanks were stabilized using a combination of erosion control matting, temporary and
permanent seeding, bare -root planting, and brush mattresses. The Site was planted with native
vegetation and is protected through a permanent conservation easement. Table 1 provides a summary
of the project approach depicted in Figure 2 in Appendix A.
Table 1. Project Mitigation Approach
Bi Cedar Creek Restoration Site: EEP Contract No. D06054 -D
ce
n.
x
Project Segment or
w 6,
c
o
a
o
w ri
o
0
Stationing
Comment
Reach ID
au a
a
;,
a
d
°
Installed in- stream structures
to control grade and reduce
bank erosion. Priority 2
Big Cedar Creek -
350
R
P2
603
1:1
603
10 +00 to
Restoration was used for this
Reach 1
16 +03
transitional reach to bring the
channel up to the historic
floodplain as quickly as
possible.
Big Cedar Creek -
16 +03 to
Installed in- stream structures
Reach 2
11016
R
Pl
2,239
1:1
2,239
38 +92
to control grade and reduce
bank erosion.
Big Cedar Creek -
38 +92 to
Installed in- stream structures
Reach 3
21046
R
P1
1,827
1:1
1,827
57 +19
to control grade and reduce
bank erosion.
Installed in- stream structures
to control grade and reduce
Big Cedar Creek -
976
R
P2
410
I :l
410
57 +19 to
bank erosion. Priority 2 was
Reach 4
61 +29
employed to tie the channel
into the box culvert at the
railroad crossing.
Big Cedar Creek -
I
534
P
I I
P
I
378
1:5
I 1
76
63 +79 to
1
Preservation.
Reac
67 +57
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Table 1. Proiect MitiLyation ADDroach
Bi Cedar Creek Restoration Site: EEP Contract No. D06054 -D
d
s
Project Segment or
G. W.
a
a
fs
o
0
Stationing
Comment
Reach ID
Regraded banks, installed
Big Cedar Creek -
904
E
EII
1,046
1:2.5
418
67 +57 to
one grade control cross -vane
Reach 6
78 +03
and one log vane.
Installed in- stream structures
to control grade and reduce
bank erosion. Priority 2
Unnamed Tributary 1 -
1998
R
P1,
248
1,,248
l:l
1
10 +46 to
Restoration was used in the
Reach 1
,
P2
22 +94
upstream, transitional section
of the reach to bring the
channel quickly up to the
historic flood lain.
Installed in- stream structures
to control grade and reduce
Unnamed Tributary 1 -
759
R
P1
1,016
l:l
1,016
22 +94 to
bank erosion. The valley
Reach.2
33 +36
narrows and slopes increase
to accommodate the decrease
in flood lain area.
Unnamed Tributary I -
33 +36 to
3+36 t
Installed in- stream structures
Reach 3
1,518
R
P1
1,885
1:1
1,885
to control grade and reduce
bank erosion.
53 +04 to
Installed in- stream structures
935
R
P1
996
1:1
996
63 +52
to control grade and reduce
Unnamed Tributary 1 -
bank erosion.
Reach 4
125
E
EII
125
1:2.5
50
66 +31 to
Regraded banks and existing
67 +56
riffle.
10+00
Installed in- stream structures
625
R
P2
609
1:1
609
16+090
to control grade and reduce
Unnamed Tributary 2
bank erosion
162
P
P
161
1:5
32
N/A
Preservation
Installed in- stream structures
to control grade. Regraded
Unnamed Tributary 3 to
73
R
P1
73
l :l
73
11+08 to
banks, stabilized with
Big Cedar Creek
11 +82
matting, installed stable
cattle crossing outside
easement to protect reach.
Constructed new pattern to
Unnamed Tributary 1 A
85
R
PI
85
1:1
85
10 +41 to
connect tributary to UT1.
11+26
Installed coir matting and
planted.
Constructed new pattern to
Unnamed Tributary 1 B
33
R
P1
34
1:1
34
10 +00 to
connect tributary to UT I.
10 +34
Installed coir matting and
planted.
Constructed new pattern to
Unnamed Tributary 1 C
78
R
P 1
78
1:1
78
10 +54 to
connect tributary to UT1.
11+32
Installed coir matting and
planted.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Tahla 1 Prninrt Mitiaatinn Annrnarh
Bi Cedar Creek Restoration Site: EEP Contract No. D06054 -D
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared
N/A
N/A
Jul -07
Restoration Plan Amended
Project Segment or
wo W.
o
o
a
o
wo w
o
y
0
Stationing
Comment
Reach ID
a
a ..
�
a
a
� ...
�
�;
�
NA
N/A
Dec -08
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
Dec -07
Qon
Dec -08
Planting of live stakes
rn
N/A
Feb -09
Planting of bare root trees
W
�
Feb -09
J
Dec -07
N/A
Feb -09
Survey of As -built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring- baseline)
Total linear ft of channel restored or preserved: 12,813
Feb -09
Mitigation Unit Summation for Streams: 11,679
* R = Restoration ** P1 = Priority I
E = Enhancement P2 = Priority II
P = Preservation P = Preservation
EII = Enhancement II
2.2.3 Project History, Contacts, and Attribute Data
Big Cedar Creek was restored by Baker through a full delivery contract with NCEEP. The
chronology of the Big Cedar Creek Restoration Project is presented in Table 2. The contact
information for all designers, contractors, and relevant suppliers is presented in Table 3. Relevant
project background information is presented in Table 4.
Tahln 9 Prninrt Activity nnrd RPnnrtina Hictnry
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared
N/A
N/A
Jul -07
Restoration Plan Amended
N/A
N/A
Jul -07
Restoration Plan Approved
Mar -07
N/A
Jul -07
Final Design — (at least 90% complete)
N/A
N/A
Jun -07
Construction Begins
Oct -07
N/A
Nov -07
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
NA
N/A
Dec -08
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
Dec -07
N/A
Dec -08
Planting of live stakes
Dec -07
N/A
Feb -09
Planting of bare root trees
Dec -07
N/A
Feb -09
End of Construction
Dec -07
N/A
Feb -09
Survey of As -built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring- baseline)
May -09
Feb -09
May -09
Year I Monitoring
Dec -09
Nov -09
Apr- 10 (Final)
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec -10
Nov -10
Dec -10 (Final)
Year 3 Monitoring
Scheduled Dec -11
Scheduled Nov -11
N/A
Year 4 Monitoring
Scheduled Dec -12
Scheduled Nov -12
N/A
Year 5 Monitoring
Scheduled Dec -13
Scheduled Nov -13
N/A
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 6
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Tahle 3- Prniect Contact Tahle
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
Designer
Project County:
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
1447 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
2.85 miz
Contact:
2.91 miz
Christine Miller, Tel. 704 - 319 -7898
Construction Contractor
BCC Reach 4
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
4.67 mil
Cary, NC 27518
4.71 mi2
Contact:
0.93 mi2
Will Pedersen, Tel. 919 - 459 -9001
Planting Contractor
UT1 Reach 3
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
1.21 mi2
Cary, NC 27518
0.02 mi2
Contact:
0.12 mi2
Will Pedersen, Tel. 919 - 459 -9001
Seeding Contractor
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. 919 - 459 -9001
Seed Mix Sources
Mellow Marsh Farm, 919- 742 -1200
Nursery Stock Suppliers
International Paper, 1- 888 - 888 -7159
Monitoring Performers
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
1447 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
Contact:
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact:
Ian Eckardt, Tel. [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring Point of Contact:
Ian Eckardt, Tel. [phone]
Table 4. Proiect Background Table
Big
Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
Project County:
Stanly County, NC
Drainage Area:
BCC Reach 1
2.85 miz
BCC Reach 2
2.91 miz
BCC Reach 3
3.30 miz
BCC Reach 4
3.35 mil
BCC Reach 5
4.67 mil
BCC Reach 6
4.71 mi2
UT1 Reach 1
0.93 mi2
UT Reach 2
0.98 mi2
UT1 Reach 3
1.18 mi2
UT1 Reach 4
1.21 mi2
UT1A
0.02 mi2
UT1B
0.12 mi2
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 7
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Table 4. Proiect Background Table
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UT1C
0.10 mi2
UT2
0.55 mi2
UT3
0.15 mi2
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
BCC Reach 1
<1%
BCC Reach 2
<1%
BCC Reach 3
<1%
BCC Reach 4
<1%
BCC Reach 5
<1%
BCC Reach 6
<1%
UTI Reach 1
<1%
UTI Reach 2
<1%
UTI Reach 3
<1%
UTI Reach 4
<1%
UTI A
0%
UTI B
0%
UT 1 C
0%
UT2
0%
UT3
0%
Stream Order:
BCC Reach 1
3rd
BCC Reach 2
3rd
BCC Reach 3
3rd
BCC Reach 4
3rd
BCC Reach 5
3rd
BCC Reach 6
3rd
UTI Reach 1
2nd
UTI Reach 2
2nd
UTI Reach 3
2nd
UT 1 Reach 4
2nd
UTIA
Ist
UT1B
1st
UTIC
1st
UT2
1 st
UT3
1 st
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Piedmont
Ecore ion:
Carolina Slate Belt
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Table 4. Proiect Backeround Table
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
Rosgen Classification of As- Built:
BCC Reach 1
E/C
BCC Reach 2
E/C
BCC Reach 3
E/C
BCC Reach 4
E/C
BCC Reach 5
B3 /lc
BCC Reach 6
F -) C
UT1 Reach 1
E/C
UT 1 Reach 2
E/C
UT 1 Reach 3
E/C
UT 1 Reach 4
C
UT 1 A
E/C
UT 1 B
E/C
UT 1 C
E/C
UT2
E
UT3
E/C
Cowardin Classification
Riverine, Upper Perennial, Unconsolidated
Bottom, Cobble - Gravel
Dominant Soil Types
BCC Reach 1
Oa
BCC Reach 2
Oa
BCC Reach 3
Oa
BCC Reach 4
Oa
BCC Reach 5
Co
BCC Reach 6
Co, BaF
UT1 Reach 1
Oa
UT 1 Reach 2
Oa, GoF
UT 1 Reach 3
Oa, GoF
UT Reach 4
Oa, Co
UT1A
Oa
UT1B
Oa
UT1C
Oa
UT2
Oa
UT3
Oa
Unnamed'Tributary to Rocky Creek,
Reference site IDs
Richland Creek, Morgan Creek and
Spencer Creek
03010103170030 (Project);
USGS HUC for Project and Reference sites
03040101080010 Reference
03 -02 -01 (Project);
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -07 -02 (Reference)
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
C
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
303d listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor?
N/A
% of project easement fenced
50%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

3.0 MONITORING PLAN
Channel stability, vegetation survival, and macroinvertebrate communities will be monitored on the project
site. Post - restoration monitoring will be conducted for five years following the completion of construction to
document project success.
3.1 Stream Monitoring
Geomorphic monitoring of restored stream reaches will be conducted for five years to evaluate the
effectiveness of the restoration practices. Monitored stream parameters include bankfull flows, stream
dimension (cross- sections), pattern and profile (longitudinal profile survey), and photographic documentation.
The methods used and any related success criteria are described below for each parameter. For monitoring
stream success criteria, 33 permanent cross - sections, 2 crest gauges, and 104 photo identification points were
established. The specific locations of these monitoring features are represented on the as -built plan sheets in
Appendix D.
3.1.1 Bankfull Events
The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period will be documented by the use of
crest gauges and photographs on each project reach. Two crest gauges were installed on the
floodplain within 10 feet of the restored channel. The crest gauges will record the highest watermark
between site visits, and the gauge will be checked at each site visit to determine if a bankfull event
has occurred. Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment
deposition on the floodplain during monitoring site visits.
Two bankfull flow events must be documented at the crest gauge within the 5 -year monitoring period.
The two bankfull events must occur in separate years; otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue
until two bankfull events have been documented in separate years.
3.1.2 Cross - sections
The 33 permanent cross - sections were installed throughout the entire Site. Within each project reach
the distance interval between cross - sections was approximately equal to the combined length of 20
bankfull widths. An emphasis has been placed on riffle data collection because many of the project
design parameters are based on riffle dimensions. This is reflected in a higher ratio of riffle to pool
cross sections selected for monitoring. Each cross - section was marked on both banks with permanent
pins to establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark will be used for cross - sections and
consistently referenced to facilitate comparison of year -to -year data. The annual cross - sectional
survey will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner
berm, water surface, and thalweg, if the features are present.
There should be little change in as -built cross - sections. If changes do take place, they will be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more unstable condition (e.g., down -
cutting or erosion) or a movement toward increased stability (e.g., settling, vegetative changes,
deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Riffle cross - sections will be classified
using the Rosgen Stream Classification System, and all monitored cross - sections should fall within
the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
3.1.3 Pattern
Annual measurements taken for the plan view of the Site will include sinuosity and meander width
ratio. Radius of curvature measurements will be taken on newly constructed meanders for the first
year of monitoring only. Pattern measurements should show little adjustment over the five year
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D - 10
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

monitoring period. If adjustments do occur, they will be evaluated to ensure that the new
measurements fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
3.1.4 Longitudinal Profile
A longitudinal profile will be completed annually during each year of the monitoring period. The
profile will be conducted for at least 3,331 LF of restored stream reaches where pattern has been
adjusted. The exact location of the annual longitudinal profile is marked on the As -built plan sheets
in Appendix D. Measurements will include thalweg, water surface, inner berm, bankfull, and top of
low bank. Each of these measurements will be taken at the head of each feature (e.g., riffle, run, pool,
glide) and at the maximum pool depth. The survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark.
The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable (i.e., they are not
aggrading or degrading). The pools should remain deep, with flat water surface slopes, and the riffles
should remain steeper and shallower than the pools. Bedforms observed should be consistent with
those observed for channels of the design stream type.
3.1.5 Bed Material Analysis
One substrate sample was taken at a constructed riffle on UT1 to show a general particle distribution
at the baseline condition. These data are provided in Appendix B. Six post- restoration pebble counts
will be performed on Big Cedar, six on UT1, and two on UT2. Pebble counts will be conducted
during post- restoration monitoring years 1, 3, and 5 at the time the cross sectional data is collected.
This data will be compared to known distributions from the existing conditions surveys. Results
should indicate either maintenance of seeded bed material or a progression towards previous
distributions.
3.1.6 Watershed Observations
As part of the post - construction monitoring following construction, any observed activities or changes
in the watershed will be noted and connections to onsite observations will be drawn, where
appropriate.
3.1.7 Photo Reference Sites
Photographs will be used to document restoration success visually. Reference stations will be
photographed after construction and for five years following construction. Reference photos will be
taken once a year, from a height of approximately five to six feet. Permanent markers will be
established to ensure that the same locations (and view directions) on the Site are monitored during
each monitoring period. Photographs taken at cross sections are provided in Appendix B, while
structure photographs are shown in Appendix E.
3.1.7.1 Lateral Reference Photos
Reference photo transects will be taken at each permanent cross - section. Photographs will be
taken of both banks at each cross - section. The survey tape will be centered in the photographs of
the bank. The water line will be located in the lower edge of the frame, and as much of the bank
as possible will be included in each photo. Photographers will make an effort to consistently
document the same view in each photo point over time.
3.1.7.2 Structure Photos
Photographs will be taken at grade control structures along the restored streams. Photographers
will make every effort to consistently document the same area in each photo point over time.
Photographs will be used to evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success
of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures subjectively. Lateral photos
should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks. A series of photos
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 1
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

over time should indicate successive maturation of riparian vegetation. The position of each
structure photo point is located on the as -built plan sheets in Appendix D.
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring
Successful restoration of the vegetation on a mitigation site is dependent upon hydrologic restoration, active
planting of preferred canopy species, and volunteer regeneration of the native plant community. In order to
determine if the criteria are achieved, twenty -three vegetation monitoring quadrants were installed across the
Site as directed by EEP monitoring guidance. The number of quadrants required is based on the plot number
spreadsheet (07312006 -2) provided by NCEEP that captures approximately five percent of the total
conservation easement. The sizes of individual quadrants are 100 square meters for woody tree species.
Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall, prior to the loss of leaves. Individual quadrant data will be
provided and will include species composition, density, and survivability. Individual seedlings will be
marked to ensure that they can be found in subsequent monitoring years. Mortality will be determined from
the difference between the previous year's living, planted seedlings and the current year's living, planted
seedlings.
At the end of the first growing season, species composition, density, and survival will be evaluated. For each
subsequent year, until the final success criteria are met, the Site will be evaluated between June and
November.
The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320, three - year -old,
planted trees per acre at the end of Year 3 of the monitoring period. The final vegetative success criterion will
be the survival of 260, five -year old, planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5 of the monitoring period.
While measuring species density is the current accepted methodology for evaluating vegetation success on
restoration projects, species density alone may be inadequate for assessing plant community health. For this
reason, the vegetation monitoring plan will incorporate the evaluation of additional plant community indices
to assess overall vegetative success.
Herbaceous vegetation, primarily native grasses, were planted at the site shall have at least 80 percent
coverage of the seeded/planted area. Any herbaceous vegetation not meeting these criteria shall be replanted.
At a minimum, at all times ground cover at the project site shall be in compliance with the North Carolina
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance.
3.3 Biological Monitoring
Benthic macroinvertebrates can be used to assess quantity and quality of life in the creek. In particular,
specimens belonging to the insect orders Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies) and Trichoptera
(caddisflies) are useful as an index of water quality. These groups are generally the least tolerant to water
pollution and therefore are very useful indicators of water quality. Sampling for these three orders is referred
to as EPT sampling. Because of the importance of biological success of a stream restoration project, benthic
macroinvertebrate sampling will be conducted for post- restoration years 3, 4 and 5 on the Site.
Pre - construction monitoring was conducted at three sites within the project limits and at one upstream
reference site in September 2006 (Figure 3). The results of this sampling event will be used as a baseline for
comparison of post restoration monitoring results. Post restoration monitoring sites shall be located in the
same general vicinity as the pre restoration monitoring sites. In general, post restoration monitoring results
should show trends towards biological distributions similar to that observed at the reference site.
The sampling methodology shall follow the Qual 4 method listed in North Carolina Division of Water
Quality's (NCDWQ) Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (2006). Laboratory
identification of collected species will be conducted by a lab properly certified by NCDWQ.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 12
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

3.4 Maintenance and Contingency Plan
Maintenance requirements vary from site to site and are generally driven by the following conditions:
• Projects without established, woody floodplain vegetation are more susceptible to erosion from floods
than those with a mature, hardwood forest.
• Projects with sandy, non - cohesive soils are more prone to short-term bank erosion than cohesive soils
or soils with high gravel and cobble content.
• Alluvial valley channels with wide floodplains are less vulnerable than confined channels.
• Wet weather during construction can make accurate channel and floodplain excavations difficult.
• Extreme and/or frequent flooding can cause floodplain and channel erosion.
• Extreme hot, cold, wet, or dry weather during and after construction can limit vegetation growth,
particularly temporary and permanent seed.
• The presence and aggressiveness of invasive species can affect the extent to which a native buffer can
be established.
• The presence of beaver can affect vegetation survivability and stream function.
Maintenance issues and recommended remediation measures will be detailed and documented in the
monitoring reports. Factors that may have caused any maintenance needs, including any of the conditions
listed above, shall be discussed. NCEEP approval will be obtained prior to any remedial action.
4.0 MONITORING RESULTS — 2010 YEAR 2 - MONITORING DATA
The five -year monitoring plan for the Site includes criteria to evaluate the success of the vegetation and
stream components of the project. The specific locations of vegetation plots, permanent cross - sections, and
the crest gauges are shown on the as -built plan sheets. Photo points, located at each of the grade control
structures along the restored stream channel, are also located on the as -built plan sheets in Appendix D.
4.1 Stream Data
Second year monitoring dimension and profile data were sampled in November 2010. Results from the
second year monitoring samples were compared with the as -built and Year l monitoring data. Permanent
cross - sections (with photos) and as -built longitudinal data, as well as the quantitative pre - construction,
reference reach, and design data used to the determine restoration approach are provided in Appendix B. The
locations of the permanent cross - sections are shown on the as -built plan sheets in Appendix D.
4.1.1 Cross - section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring
Results
Cross Sections
The 33 permanent cross - sections along the restored channels were re- surveyed to document stream
dimension at the end of monitoring Year 2.
Riffle Cross - sections 24, 31, and 32 aggraded slightly. The channel bed at Cross - section 24 has
shifted upward toward as -built conditions. The aggradation at Cross - sections 31 and 32 may reflect
sediment being transported through the system. These changes in channel geometry will be
monitored.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 13
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Pool Cross - sections 8 and 27, which are located in the apex of meander bends, show evidence of bed
scour. The outside of meanders experience an increase in shear stress during large storm events that
can cause scour and deepening. Scour and deepening of some pools is expected.
Riffle Cross - sections 5, 7, 9, and 28 have experienced bed degradation during Year 2. Cross - section
5 has experienced extensive downcutting. The bed scour at cross - sections 7, 9, and 28 is located
along the side of channel that receives the flow vectors from upstream outer meander bends.
Additional stream related information is discussed in section 4.1.3 "Stream Problem Area View ".
Longitudinal Profile
The Year 2 longitudinal profile was conducted during November 2010. A total of 3,405 LF was
resurveyed along representative sections of the restored channels. Survey on Big Cedar Creek was
conducted from As -Built Station 12 +75 to 18 +04 and 47 +00 to 57 +28. Survey on UT started at As-
Built Station 13 +75 to 30 +19. The fourth section resurveyed was along UT2 from As -Built Station
11 +00 to 13 +05. The representative longitudinal profiles were resurveyed to document stream profile
at the end of monitoring Year 2. Pool — to — pool spacing on BCC Reach 1 increased from 127 to 152
feet. The change will be monitored. The pool — to — pool spacing on BCC Reaches 2 and 3 changed
very little since the as -built survey. The majority of riffle slopes in BCC Reach 1, 2, and 3 remained
similar to as -built values. Riffle slopes on Reaches 1 and 2 of UT1 were also similar to Year 1
values. The pool — to — pool spacing in UT1 Reaches 1 and 2 remained similar to as -built values.
Sinuosity was not calculated because only portions of each reach were surveyed.
The longitudinal profile and a summary of parameters measured are provided in Appendix B. Please
note that this summary represents only the portions of the project that were surveyed.
Bed Material Analysis
Prior to construction, riffles were comprised of grain size particles ranging from fine clay to bedrock.
The constructed riffles were seeded with onsite alluvium comprised mostly of fine gravel to large
cobble size material. Since pebble counts are to be conducted only during Monitoring Years 1, 3, and
5, no pebble count data was performed during Year 2.
4.1.2 Stream Problem Areas Plan View
The majority of constructed stream channels are functioning as designed. During Year 1 bed
adjustments included bed degradation in a few riffles, scour along the inner arm of a couple J -hook
structures, backwatering due to improper elevation on J -hook structure invert, and slight shifts in
thalweg alignment due to deposition and toe erosion. The riffles experiencing bed degradation also
had portions of their bed armor displaced. The degradation indicated that the increased shear stress
that occurs in the designed pool meanders immediately upstream of these riffles wasn't being
dissipated during storm events. The degradation at these riffles persists and a couple of riffles have
worsened during Year 2. The scour observed at a few J -hook structures along Big Cedar Creek has
remained along the inner boulder arms through Year 2. Backwater conditions observed immediately
upstream of a couple J -hook structures on Big Cedar Creek during Year 1 weren't visible at the time
of the Year 2 assessment. Raw banks are present on portions of Big Cedar Creek, UT I, and UT2.
The banks in these areas lacked vegetation and most had damage to the bank matting. This may be a
result of rocky soils in portions of the project area that are making it difficult for vegetation to
become established. Visual assessment scores are located in Table 5.
Table B.1 (Appendix B) provides a summary of problem areas. See Figures B 1- B 11 in Appendix B
for an overview of all stream problem areas. Table B.2 in Appendix B has additional data further
explaining the visual assessment scores. Slight increases in scores from Year 1 to Year 2 reflect
minor calculation differences rather than improvements to features.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 14
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Table S. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054-D
BCC Reach 1 (603 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
—MY-05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
'77
NO W&
Pools'
100%
100%
100%
Thalweg
100%
84%
83%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
S
"a
Bed General
100%
98%
99%
1, WON
WAM
Bank Condition
100%
100%
100%
mgwg
Vanes J Hooks etc.
-----
-----
-----
ONE=
11MI-w-l',
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
—100-/o
A"
BCC Reach 2
2239 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
84%
87%
Pools
100%
100%
91%
Thalweg
100%
100%
93%
Meanders
100%
100%
96%
Bed General
100%
96%
95%
Bank Condition
100%
100%
82%
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100%
93%
95%
. . . . . . . . . . . _4
A,
W
00
Wads and Bouiders
100%
94%
88%
0
BCC Reach 3
1827 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
97%
97%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalweg
100%
100%
77%
ig' 4
"M �' ""12
Meanders
100%
100%
95%
Bed General
100%
100%
94%
Bank Condition
100%
94%
93%
ilia Wlw*bi"'
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100%
96%
92%
P
"
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
AM"
BCC Reach 4 (410 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
11, , WE
Thalweg
100%
100%
67%
Meanders
100%
92%
92%
Bed General
100%
98%
88%
'0�
T' TWA&
amp
Bank Condition
100%
88%
80%
.... .....
. I VA
Vanes / J Hooks etc.
100%
100%
88%
Wads and Boulders
160%
100%
100%
BCC Reach 6 (969 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01–
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
sa'
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalweg
100% 1
100%
100%
MIFF
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054-D 15
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT – YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Table 5. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project
100
Meanders 010
No D06054-D
l00% . .. ...
100% 7777- P
3
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
"40"
Bank Condition
100%
100%
100%
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
----- I
-----
1UT1
Reach 1
1248 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05,
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
11
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Bank Condition
100%
100%
100%
PRI,
Vanes J Hooks etc.
-----
-----
-----
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
UTI Reach 2 (1016)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
v
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Bank Condition
100%
100%
99%
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
UTI
Reach 3 (1885
LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
98%
97%
Pools
100%
100%
96%
Thalweg
100%
100%
95%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
.
. . . . . . . . . M
"n
MR,
a
'! ' '
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Bank Condition
100%
97%
82%
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100% 1
100%
100%
' 4A' 6 R ""gN
'�K
Wads and Boulders
100% 1
100%
100%
1UT1 Reach 4 996 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
87%
87%
Pools
100%
90%
90%
Thalweg
100%
100%
71%
Meanders
100%
100%
29%
Bed General
100%
76%
87%
Bank Condition
100%
90%
50%
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
40%
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054-D 16
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT - YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Table 5. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054-D
UTlA (85 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
-----
-----
-----
Pools
-----
-----
-----
Thalweg
-----
-----
-----
Meanders
-----
-----
-----
Bed General
100%
100%
93%
'S
Bank Condition
100%
100%
100%
Vanes / J Hooks etc.
-----
-----
-----
—
Wads and Boulders
-----
-----
-----
UTIB (34 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
-----
----- —
-----
Pools
-----
-----
Thalweg
-----
-----
-----
Meanders
-----
-----
-----
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Bank Condition
100%
100%
100%
;^ q
- ''s
Vanes J Hooks etc.
100%
100%
100%
Wads and Boulders
UTIC (78 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
-----
----- —
-----
�-n-7K! �Fp"'
k.
Pools
-----
-----
-----
- ----
W,
2Thalwe ,
Meanders
-----
-----
-----
omm-or"
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
1>>F
Bank Condition
100%
100%
100%
Vanes / J Hooks etc.
an
---
-----
Wads and Boulders
• •
't7
PRIM,
UT2 (609 LF)
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY-03
MY-04
MY-05
Riffles
100%
100%
94%
Now
Pools
100%
100%
100%
'S
Thalweg
100%
100%
100%
41, 9-1
Meanders
100%
100%
86%
ge,
'RAW,
Bed General
100%
100%
97%
Bank Condition
100%
100%
73%
V-znes J Hooks etc.
100%
100%
96%
a-H
M IP"
All
"'P
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
75%
S
,
UT3 3 LF within easement
Feature
Initial
MY-01
MY-02
MY -03
MY-04
MY-05
Rif'.';'Ies
-----
-----
-----
pow
Poo is
-----
-----
-----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054-D 17
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT - YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010
i

Table 5. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
of
Thalweg - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- ,066
Method of
Gage
Photo #
Station Number
Data
Bankfull Event
Data
Height
(If available)
Collection
Collection
(feet)
Bed General
100%
100%
100%
Condition
100%
100%
100 %,°
0.14
— 12/8/10
Bank
UT1 Crest Gauge
UT1 Reach 4
10 /10 /10
/ J Hooks
100%
100%
100%
$110..
Vanes etc.
Wads and Boulders
- - - --
- - - --
- - - --
.1"
4.2 Hydrology Data
The 'on -site crest gauges documented the occurrence of one bankfull event during the second year monitoring
period. The highest stage recorded during the second year monitoring period was 0.21 feet. Bankfull
verification summaries are included in Table 6. Crest gauge locations are included in the as -built plan sheets
in Appendix D. Bankfull verification photos are provided in Appendix E.
Table 6. Verification of Bankful Events
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
Date of
Date of Occurrence of
Method of
Gage
Photo #
Station Number
Data
Bankfull Event
Data
Height
(If available)
Collection
Collection
(feet)
BCC Crest Gauge
BCC Reach 3
12/8/10
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.14
— 12/8/10
UT1 Crest Gauge
UT1 Reach 4
10 /10 /10
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.21
—10/10/10
4.3 Vegetation Data
Bare -root trees and shrubs were planted within all areas of the conservation easement. A minimum 50 -foot
buffer was established along all restored stream reaches. In general, bare -root vegetation was planted at a
target density of 680 stems per acre, in an 8 -foot by 8 -foot grid pattern. Planting of bare -root trees and shrubs
were completed in February 2009. The restoration plan for the Site specifies that the number of quadrants
required is based on the CVS -NCEEP monitoring guidance. The number of quadrants required was
determined using the plot number spreadsheet (07312006 -2) provided by NCEEP that captures five percent of
the total conservation easement. The sizes of individual quadrants are 100 square meters. A total of 23
vegetation plots, each 10 meters by 10 meters in size, were established across the restored site.
The average Year 2 density of planted bare root stems, based on the data from the 23 monitoring plots, is 753
stems per acre. The vegetation monitoring indicated a survivability range of 283 stems per acre to 971 stems
per acre. Only 1 vegetation plot (15) did not meet the projected Year 3 success criteria of 320 trees per acre;
however, the site is still on the path to meet both the Year 3 vegetative success criteria and the final year's
vegetative success criteria of 260 trees per acre.
No volunteer species were noted in any of the Site's vegetation plots, or were too small to verify. If any
woody volunteer species are observed in subsequent monitoring years they will be flagged and added to the
overall steris per acre assessment of the Site. The locations of the vegetation plots are shown on the as-built-
plan sheets in Appendix D.
Additional vegetation related information is listed below. Monitoring result tables and photos are located in
Appendix C.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 18
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

4.3.1 Vegetative Problem Areas
Year 1 Monitoring noted that rocky, sandy soils are predominant throughout the site and have limited
the establishment of herbaceous vegetation along the banks and within the floodplains of the restored
reaches. Bare floodplain areas, noted during Year 2 Monitoring, were limited mostly to floodplains
of UT1 upstream of the stream crossing. Bare banks are present along some outer meander bends on
Reaches 3 and 4 of UT 1, along UT2, and in the downstream restored section of Big Cedar. These
areas lacking good vegetative growth have allowed for areas of scour and pocket erosion to occur on
outer meander bends on some of the restored sections of stream.
After one year of monitoring these areas of concern, it is anticipated that they will continue to worsen
unless additional stabilization measures are implemented throughout the site. Therefore bio-
engineered stabilization measures (vegetated geo -lifts) and brush mattress installation will be
implemented on outer meander bends of UT2 and Big Cedar Creek, as well as, on some meanders
along Reaches 3 and 4 of UT1. Banks experiencing erosion issues will be regraded and matted.
Areas needing immediate ground cover stabilization will be reseeded and mulched to reduce erosion
and rilling while the perennial vegetation is becoming established.
A variety of invasive species are present throughout the site and consist of Ligustrum sinese (Chinese
privet), Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle), and Rosa multiflora (multi -flora rose). Though
present, these species are not currently affecting the establishment of native species. However, in
order to prevent these species from spreading and becoming more densely populated throughout the
site, an herbicidal spot treatment application will need to be scheduled during 2011.
j See Table C.6 in Appendix C for problem area categories, locations, descriptions, causes, and photo
log.
4.3.2 Vegetative Problem Area Plan View
`- See Figures C1 -CI I in Appendix C for an overview of all vegetative problem areas.
4.4 Areas of Concern
Overall the, restored channels are functioning as designed with some areas of concern. The areas of concern
include the areas of observed bed degradation and raw banks along Big Cedar Creek, UT1, and UT2. These
areas will require maintenance which has been scheduled to begin in late winter /early spring of 2011. Though
invasive species are currently not affecting native vegetation, they will continue to be monitored and an
herbicidal spot treatment application will be scheduled during 2011 for dense populations.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 19
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

5.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. CVS -NCEEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4. 1,
2007.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2001. Interim, Internal Technical Guide: Benthic
Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Protocols for Compensatory Stream Restoration Projects.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2006. Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic
Macroinvertebrates.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169 -199.
Rosgen, D.L., 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, Colo.
Schafale, Michael P. and Alan S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina. North Carolina Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetland Research Program (WRP), 1997. Technical Note VN- RS -4.1.
US Army Corps of Engineers, WRP, July 2000. Technical Notes ERDC TN- WRAP- 00 -02.
US Army Corps of Engineers, 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Prepared with cooperation from US
Environmental Protection Agency, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, and the NC Division of
Water Quality. www.saw.usace. army .mil /wetlands/Miti2ation/stream mitigation.html
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., EEP PROJECT NO. D06054 -D 20
BIG CEDAR CREEK ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 2, DECEMBER 2010

Appendix A
Figures
1. Vicinity Map
2. Project Summary Map
3. Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Map

To visit the site, take Highway 52 for approximately ten miles south,
turn right onto Mount Zion Church Road (1.25 miles south of the
Town of Norwood). Follow Mount Zion Church Road for
approximately 0.5 mile west to the intersection of Mount Zion Road
and Big Cedar Creek. UT1, UT2, and the upstream reaches of Big
Cedar Creek can be accessed from the farm road on the north side
of Mount Zion Church Road, approximately 0.25 miles east of the
intersection of the railroad and Mount Zion Church road. Reach 5
and 6 of Big Cedar Creek can be accessed from a farm field
approximately 0.1 mile west of the intersection of the railroad and
Mount Zion Church road.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Acess by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight and
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms and
timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site vistation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activities requires prior coordination with EEP
hADKIN
/ /03 -07 -13
YADKIN
03 -0 -12
Ri t
r- 'I*-
stemlemew
PROGRAM
a
Stanly County,
EEP Project No.: D06054 -D
.It
♦
t
i♦
♦
I i
♦
t
�n
I
YADKI
103-07-1
r
i
1
1�
c
I
♦
c
t
� 1
I ,
t
52 j
jL
I
ate.. r
N t� ` I Mount Gil
HU 03040105060080 111
YADKIN
IProiect Sitel
1 J I/ •
t YAD
/ 03 -0
—._
i
i
ll..
I
1
LEGEND Figure 1: Vicinity Map
D USGS Hydrologic Unit gig Cedar Creek Stream Restoration Project
_ NCDWQ Sub -basin Annual Monitoring Plan - Year 2
Stanly County, NC
CO Counties
December 2010
0 2 4
Miles

Appendix B '
Morphological Summary Data
Cross - section Plots
Profile Plots
Morphology Data Table 7 & 8
Tables B.1 & B.2
Representative Stream Problem Area Figures B 1- B 11
Representative Stream, Problem Area Photos

Permanent Cross Section X1
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream I I I Max BKF
Feature Tvve BKF Area BKF Width BKF Denth Denth W!D I BH Ratio I ER I BKF Elev I TOB Elev
244
243
242
c
z 241
_d
240
X1 Riffle
G--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
239
238
237
95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165
Station
- -9 Bankfull Floodprone — i— Asbuilt 0 Year — CIE — Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Typc
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
45.3
26.95
1.68
3.63
16.04
1
240.64
240.64
X2 Pool
245
-- -- --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
244
243
242
F 241
---------------------------------------IN
W 240!`
239
238
237
236
95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 175
Station
- -9 -- Bankfull - -9 -- Floodprone AsBuilt Year 1 --ME— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type -
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth
WfD
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
62.8
27.56
2.28
3.93
1 12.1
1
2.7
239.82
239.82
X3 Riffle
246
244
o---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ---- ---------- ----- - - - - -0
242
0
240
----- ------
---------- ---------- --- --- �
u�
238
236
234
95
105 115 125
135 145 155 165 175
Station
- -9 -- Bankfull - -9 -- Floodprone
—* – AsBuilt 0 Year 1 Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
'Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
70.5
34
2.07
5.9
16.4
1
236.36
236.36
X4 Pool
244
242
ci----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- -- -- ------ --------- ---0
240
0
238
>u
w
236
234
232
230
95
105 115 125 135 145 155 165
175 185
Station
- -9 -- Bankf ill Floodprone —M-- AsBuilt + Year 1 CIE— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
IBKFDepthI
Depth
W!D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riftic
E
61.4
22.47
2.73
4.57
8.22
1
3.3
236.28
236.28
X5 Riffle
241
0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o
239
0
237
w
oil p
235
233
231
95
105 115 125 135 145
155
165 175 185
Station
- -[� -- Bankfull - -9 -- Floodprone -- t— AsBuilt
—6 Year 1 -IE— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Strearn
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
IBKFDepth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
72.5
31.99
2.27
1 5.44
1 14.12
1
233.38
233.38
X6 Pool
240
--
o----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - --0
238
236
c
L� 234
W 232
230
228
226
95
105 115 125 135 145 155 165
175 185
Station
--�- Bankfull - -6 -- Floodprone —1E— AsBuilt — 0 Year I -t(— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X7
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature Ty BKF Area BKF Width BKF Depth Depth W/D I BH Ratio I ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle E 1 64.5 23.8 1 2.71 1 4.55 1 8.78 1 1 1 3.1 1 232.97 232.97
C
L
d
w
240
238
236
234
232
230
228
226
X7 Riffle
o-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 175
Station
-�- Bankfitll - -9 -- Floodprone —X — AsBuilt - 0 Year 1 —11E— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
185

Permanent Cross Section X8
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
I
I
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
78.9
34.46
2.29
5.44
1 15.04
1
227.87
227.87
X8 Pool
236
—
234
o---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - --o
232
c 230
'C
u
W228
--------L.----°--------°-----------
226
224
222
95 105 115 125 135
145 155 165 175 185 195
Station
--�--Bankfull - -9--Floodprone
— 1K— AsBuilt — 4—Year 1 - --* — Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X9
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature Tvoe BKF Area rBKFWidth IBKFDevtlil Depth 11 W/D i BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
232
231
230
229
0
d 228
w
227
226
225
224
X9 Riffle
0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0
95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 175
Station
I
- -9 -- Bankfull - -$-- Floodprone --*-- AsBuilt + Year 1 --IE— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X10
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature- .
,: T
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF De' th
Depth
W/D
I BH Ratio
I ER
I BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
47.6
23.31
2.04
3.06
1 11.41
1
3.3
225.05
225.05
X 10 Riffle
229
228
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- - - - --o
227
226
0
z
> 225
224
223
222
221
95
105 115
125 135 145 155 165 175
Station
---e ---
- -9 -- Floodprone --X— AsBuilt Year] —)K Year
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X11
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 20 10)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
BI-I Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
56.9
26.09
2.18
3.45
1 11.97
1
3.2
220.73
220.73
X11 Riffle
225
224 0-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------- -- ----- --- ---- -0
223
0
222
d"
221
w
220
219
218
217
216
95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 175 185 195
Station
---e --- -- $-- Floodprone - -)E— AsBuilt +Year1 - 1t — Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X12
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature I Tvoe BKF Area I BKF Width BKF Deod1 Death I W/D I BH Ratio I ER I BKF Elev I TOB Elev
222
220
218
0
'L
216
w
214
212
210
95
X12 Pool
105 115 125 135 145 155 165 175 185 195
Station
--[�-- Bankfull --9 -- Floodprone --M-- AsBuilt —I Year I -It— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X13
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
;Fegtgtg
_;�� ti.,.
BKF Area,
`BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W /D
BH Ratio
ER-
BKF Elev
>TOB Elev
Riffle
C
59.7
27.98
2.13
3.59
1 13.11
1
2.9
214.87
214.87
X13 Riffle
219
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
218
217
216
.m
215
--------------------------------------
W
214
213
212
211
95
105 115 125 135 145 155 165
175 185
Station
--�-- Bankfull - -6 -- Floodprone --*(--- AsBuilt 0 Year 1 — Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X14
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
I BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Ritfle
C
13.4
16.52
0.81
1.61
20.42
1
3.3
274.31
274.31
X14 Riffle
276.5
276 p-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ --- ---------- -----------0
275.5
275
e
274.5
,aifi
m 274
273.5
273
272.5
272
95
105 115 125 Station 135 145 155
- -0 -- Bankfull --0-- Floodprone --X-- AsBuilt Year 1 CIE— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X15
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
'rype
BKF -Area
I BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
I BH Ratio
ER
I BKF Elev
I TOB Elev
Pool
30.5
24.24
1.26
1 2.82
1 19.26
1
273.93
273.93
X15 Pool
278
-
277
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
276
275
o
Z
274
�� ----------------------------------------
273
272
271
270
95 105 115 125 Station 135 145 155
--$- Bankfull - -9 -- Floodprone --M— AsBuilt 0 Year 1 -- 11E — Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X16
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
I
Max BKF
I
Feature
Tv e
113KFArea
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB E lev
Riftic
t
14.3
11.9
1.2
1 2.08
1 9.9
1
4.1
272.7
272.7
X16 Riffle
276
275
o------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --0
274
0
> 273
u
rat---------------
--------
272
271
270
95 105 115 Station 125 135 145
- -9 -- Bankfull Floodprone —i — AsBuilt Year 1 Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X17
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
I
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
B
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
I BKF Elev
TOB Elev
1'001
31.6
1 25.25
1 1.25
1 2.68
20.16
1
270.61
270.61
X17 Pool
274
G--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --0
273
272
0 271
y
d
- --------------------------------------
w 270
269
268
267
95 105 115 125 Station 135 145 155
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X18
Looking at the Left Bank
Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
I BH Ratio
I ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
12.4
11.98
1.04
1.63
1 11.55
1
4.3
268.12
1 268.12
X18 Riffle
271
270
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
269
e
0
'L
d
w 268
---------------
- - -- -- t
267
266
95 105 115 125
135 145 155
Station
- 9-- Bankfull - -B -- Floodprone
--X — AsBuilt — 0 Year ] — CIE —Year
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X19
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
` Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BfI Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
14.4
13.57
1.06—T
1.78
12.8
1
3.9
264.09
264.09
X19 Riffle
266
o----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - --o
265
e 264
o----------------------
'L
u
L1]
263
262
261
95 105
115
125 Station 135
145 155
-- &-- Bankfull - -8 -- Floodprone
--+(-- AsBuilt — S Year I — *— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X20
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
I Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER ;
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
25.5
1 22.31
1.14
1 2.68 1
19.49
1
260.7
260.7
X20 Pool
264
G------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --o
263
262
C
F 261
- -------------------- - -- -
260
259
258
257
95 105 115 125 135 145
155 165
Station
- �-- Bankfull --9-- Floodprone --- )E— AsBuilt — 0 Year 1 -!t— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X21
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth I
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riftic
C
15.4
1 15.8
0.98
1 1.67 1
16.18
1
3.7
260.28
260.28
X21 Riffle
262.5
262
o------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- --- ----------------- --- ----o
261.5
261
0 260.5
-----------------------
260
W
259.5
259
258.5
258
95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165
Station
- -9 -- Bankfull --9-- Floodprone —X— AsBuilt 0 Year ] —ilE— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X22
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 20 10)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
I
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
IBV-FWidthlBKFDepthi
Depth '
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
I BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
16.6
15.76
1.06
1 2
14.92
1
3.8
1 254.17
254.17
X22 Riffle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
256
255
e
•a°
>
= 254
----------------------
w
253
252
95 105 115 125 135 145
155 165
Station
--[� -- Bankf ill - -9 -- Floodprone — )(-- AsBuilt 4 Year l -- * - -Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X23
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - cc
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
I
Feature
Type
BKF Arca
BKF Width
BKFDe th
Depth
I W/D
I BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
28.5
1 20.8
1 1.37
1 2.89
1 15.2
1
249.97
249.97
X23 Pool
254
253
t 3---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---- -- --- --- ------
---- -- - --0
252
251
C
i
O
F
�
> 250
d
----------------------------
w
249
248
247
246
95
105 115 125 135 145 155
165
Station
- -9 -- Bankfull - -$ -- Floodprone — X— AsBuilt —f— Year 1 Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X24
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream ( I I Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width BKF Depth Depth W!D I BH Ratio I ER I BKF Elev I TOB Elev
Riffle I C 1 18 1 14.69 1 1.22 1 1.91 1 11.99 1 1 1 3.6 1 248.19 1 248.19
251
250
249
e
0
> 248
u
w
247
246
245
95
X24 Riffle
o---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
105 115 125 Station 135 145 155
-$-- Bankful I ---9--- Floodprone —X— AsBuilt 0 Year 1 Ott— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X25
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width BKF Dc th Depth W/D I BH Ratio ER BKF Elev I TOB Elev
Riffle C 14.6 1 14.24 1 1.02 1 1.61 1 13.92 1 4 239.73 1 239.73
X25 Riffle
241.5
240.5
G
O
F
w
239.5
238.5
237.5
95
o----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
105 115 125 135 145 155
Station
-�- Bankfull --9- Floodprone - i--AsBuilt 6 Year --*— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X26
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
T e
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W/D
BFI Ratio.
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riftic
C
18.4
1 16.62
1.11
1.67
1 15.02
1
3.5
237.07
237.07
X26 Riffle
240
239
0-----------------------------°°---------------------------------------------
------- ------- ----
---- --- ------ -O
238
I
c
e
m237
----------------------------
W
236
235
234
95
105 115 125 135
145
155
Station
- --e---Bankfull - -9- Floodprone — )+—AsBuilt —0 Year —0 Year
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X27
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 20 10)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W;D
BH Ratio
ER
I BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
33
23.56
1 1.4
3.09
1 16.84
1
235.22
235.22
X27 Pool
239
- --
o--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --o
238
237
236
G
O
L_-
_-- •- •--------- •--- -_.�..
235
234
233
232
231
95
105 115 125 135
145 155 165
Station
-- O-- Bankfull Floodprone — *— AsBuilt 0 Year Year
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X28
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collecl
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Tvpe ,
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
I BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
23.3
17.2
1.36
1 2.51
1 12.67
1
3.4
229.55
229.55
X28 Riffle
232
-
231
230
—fie —�91 - ---- ----------------- --
(j
229
228
227
95
105 115 125 135
145
155
Station
-- Bankf ill Floodprone --M-- AsBuilt
--4 Year 1
—i1E— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X29
Looking at the Left Bank
rig Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
IBKFArca
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth
I W1D I
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
46.8
1 21.98
1 2.13
1 4.04
1 10.31
1
228.85
228.85
X29 Pool
234
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -o
232
230
C
O-----------------------------
>
228
W
226
224
222
95
105 115 125 Station 135
145 155 165
- -9 -- Bankf ill - -E> -- Floodprone --)(-- AsBuilt Year 1 Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X30
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth
Depth
W(D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
E?
33.9
1 18.66
1 1.82
3.01
1 10.26
1
3.4
222.48
222.48
X30 Riffle
226
G------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -o
225
224
0 223
y�{�
d
222
221
220
219
95
105 115 125 135 145
155 165
Station
-- C� -- Bankfull --9 -- Floodprone --K-- AsBuilt --4-- Year I —*-- Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X31
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature Type IBKFArea IBKF Width BKF Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio I ER I BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riftic C 25.1 1 22.52 1 1.11 1 1.66 20.25 1 2.1 215.21 1 215.21
X31 Riffle
217
216
c
0
m
pj 215
214
213
95
lug 112� "'D Station 14-11 1Jz� toy
- �- Bankfull - -0-- Floodprone --*— AsBuilt Year 1 -IE— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X32
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected October 2010)
Looking at the Left Bank
Stream
Feature I Tvne I BKF Area
249
248
247
0
d
W
246
245
244
95
Looking at the Right Bank
Max BKF
BKF Depth Depth WID BH I
1.21 1 1.82 1 11.87 1
X32 Riffle
4.4 1 246.72 1 246.72
o-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- --------- -- - - -o I
105 115 125 Station 135 145 155 165
- -� -- Bankfull - -0-- Floodprone —ice AsBuilt 0 Year 1 -1(— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

Permanent Cross Section X33
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collet
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2
Stream
Max BKF
Feature
Type
IBKFArca
BKF Width
BKF De th
Depth
WA)
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
25.8
1 21.98
1 1.17
1 2.96
1 18.71
1
244.55
244.55
X33 Pool
248
G---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
247
246
e
a°
a
245
244
243
242
241
95 105 115 125 135 145 155
165 175
Station
- -6 -- Bankful I --$ -- Floodprone —X-- AsBuilt -+ Year 1
--1— Year 2
Big Cedar Creek, EEP Contract No. D06054 -D,
December 2010, Monitoring Year 2

w
O
C)
O
Q
Q N
Z
03
CIS
U �
C C
O
U o
W o
W
c'xi O_
� O
U N
w
•o :o
U
ou au
GCl Q
Z ca m co
F > m
J ? Q •>
LO
cD
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
LO
Q
(O
Qr
0
w
LOr
I-
N
r
�
I
C
O p
(O
L
C0
N c
O
W N
L
�
I
d
U
LO
v
W
i
i
Cl)
LO
LO
N
rf
M M Cl) Cl)
M M T
N N
N N N N N
N N
UOIJenal3
w
O
C)
O
Q
Q N
Z
03
CIS
U �
C C
O
U o
W o
W
c'xi O_
� O
U N
w
•o :o
U
ou au
GCl Q

m
rol
O
m
V
LO
O
m
N
LD
C
O
O
O
O
O
0)
00
0
m
CD '7 N O 00 (D It N_ _O
N N N N
N N N N N N N N N
UOIIBAG13
A
N
H
O N
zt9
U N
ccS �'0
Y bD
0 C
O
U o
w°
� o
U cv
w it
V
U a�
� U
.. N
Q

2
O
CD
O
Q
N
z�
U �
� bq
G'r Lr"
O '
U o
W o
y O
L.
U °N
Ly L�
as .°o
U
U
N
Q
LL
m m LL m
Lf)
N
co
N
M
0
Ln
CD
i
04
N
M
T
O
it
LO
LO
N
0
a.
Cl)
L
Y O
G1 +r
.O
V
c
L `
cC N
o
L w
U m
;I
N
m
O
�+
U7
T
i
CD
I
�
d
O
LO
U)
LO
M
O
LO O LO O
N
Ln O
N N
N
N N N
UOIIBA013
2
O
CD
O
Q
N
z�
U �
� bq
G'r Lr"
O '
U o
W o
y O
L.
U °N
Ly L�
as .°o
U
U
N
Q

F25
v
Cl
Cl
0
Q
O N
z�
o
U o
a•
W o
� o
ti
U
w
b w
cu
a�
U
� U
Q
• r
LL m
J Of Q Y
0
0
I
T
I
OD
r
T
N
r
4)
L G
M N
!
O
d
�°
w
V �
o
r
m
I
O
r
�
N
a+
I
�
r
C
j
I i
j i
rn
0
co
N N
(0 (n co
N N
N N
N
N N
O r
N
UOIIBAG13
F25
v
Cl
Cl
0
Q
O N
z�
o
U o
a•
W o
� o
ti
U
w
b w
cu
a�
U
� U
Q

0
Ix
ol 'o
E
On
.0 0
o
Lu d
Z
L) N
a. E
CL T
U3 0
ca ul 0
. . . . . . .
. . . r r
. . . . . .
I u
A
.
r r r d i . . .
. . . . . .
. . . r
r r. . . .
iF L.
8
rs u
U > "j
5
t; g
48
e V 2r
12
ti V t;
C
E z
E
uj
t E
14
C6 -
M 96
0
Ix
ol 'o
E
On
.0 0
o
Lu d
Z
L) N
a. E
CL T
U3 0
ca ul 0

00
E
0
2
. 0 - Z
L) r,
cL E
0. F
d5 w uj o 0
- — — — — — — — — -
O
. . . . . .
. . . . .
-i o
eo
< >
K e s
1:1 u m R
t E
o
00
E
0
2
. 0 - Z
L) r,
cL E
0. F
d5 w uj o 0

E
S E
C C
N 0
w
ca
(i E
Ca Lu
Lu
00
. . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . .
.........
.....
.
...
O
at
- — — — - - - - - -
. . . . .
. . . . .
. .
.
. . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
O
U
A, 's <
P
rc
5 a . -. -- -
> io A w
� yy c
5oa »mM >u
u
.4 >
E
S E
C C
N 0
w
ca
(i E
Ca Lu
Lu
00

toad
!!lilt
1:111111111111
Hill
--11- 1
11 ---
111111111111H
1FROMM21
Hill
!!M
MMIMM!
1111111!
O
E
its 1
i 1 i 1 i 1
M 1, 1 i, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
HOW" 1
H 111
1 111 1
O
1 1 1 1 1 1
;1191 1
O
eE
not
0
is! in
1 Dive,
toad

C; 0
C 0
0
Z
L) -6
k
2
(L E
C. �
w
81
. . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
.
O
- - - - - - - — — —
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
O
O
. .
. . .
r . . . . .
. . . .
. .
. .
E fs
'2 02
-
E
L� -
2UP
a -S z
0- E
� F
G'
A
0
O
>0 5-6
0
0
0
O
Ei
96 E!
92
C; 0
C 0
0
Z
L) -6
k
2
(L E
C. �
w
81

O
c o
..282
c -
w cj
Z
co
E
M Co w 0
.
......
. .
....
. . . . . I . . . .
1 1 i 1 1
u
c-I
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . .
cl
!::o,a:
1:u
O
Vi
<
i� ws cd
6
j •5
vs -S
E
m2
e
0
o o
-o a
IR
U> 4>
1> C, u m a
;R
T
04 o
"i t:
Fi
O
c o
..282
c -
w cj
Z
co
E
M Co w 0

IY
60 C?
ddZo
w
cL E
CL
Co Lu o
.
.........
.....
. .....
.. ....
... .......
aW
. . . . . . . . . .
96
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . . . . . .
TA
A
O
O 1 09 1 1 1
1 1
I . I I i I
I I I I I
i I . . . I
. . . I
. . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
=0
BE
-5
m 0
ul
!2 A >,
10
2
t:
ad
ad
0
G.
t
om
01
IY
60 C?
ddZo
w
cL E
CL
Co Lu o

0
E
0
LLJ 0 0
Z
41
E
Ca Lu a
. . . . . . .
. . .
rn
. . .
. . . . e .
. .
a =_
.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
u
U
u
Im,
K e e5 A
G EwQ> u,
o o
u
o
U
.j u
>
o
0
E
0
LLJ 0 0
Z
41
E
Ca Lu a

i�
0
11 '-
E'
c 20
-E
R111111111
HH,
Hill 1
11 ill
o
wit
lim i
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1"E-1111111111
jM1111111111
Hill
Hill 1
l
NMI&:
HH!
HIM 1
11 ill
- - - - - - - - - -
SO
SO
O
O
HUME
r�%
c
ago it
C1 a
its
PIC
i�
0
11 '-
E'
c 20
-E

t:
0
C4 0
2
-
o
iB
LLI 0
Z
co
tVad
LL,
O
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
1 u 1 1 1 O O 1
O
O
O
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vl 00
O
m
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
o k
> �2 > Ul-
iF
M V Y F
12 m R1 U a g s L, CE
lo
C
u
al
I
Lt
t:
0
C4 0
2
-
o
iB
LLI 0
Z
co
tVad
LL,

0
0
c
.0
LLI 0
0z
L) u C-4
CT �a �;
2 Q
w cL E
0 (L
ra ui o
- - - - - - - - - -
O
til
- - -- — -- — --
t 1 i t
A
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
v
O
. . . . . . . . . . . .
O
O
'U
's�
< > �R
> C,
02
0
A
"C
6 A
0
0
c
.0
LLI 0
0z
L) u C-4
CT �a �;
2 Q
w cL E
0 (L
ra ui o

r
0
Or N
mooc
c
C 0 E 0
Z
L) -6
co
w cL E
L) (L R
cc uj
Lu 0 0
O
1 1 1
R, :2
i u
O
ig
0 a
r= 14
t;
I
96
r
0
Or N
mooc
c
C 0 E 0
Z
L) -6
co
w cL E
L) (L R
cc uj
Lu 0 0

MAO
1-Immill
Hill
Hill 1
Qill
MMIMM!
Kr
c ---. - - - - - -
co
1111; 1
11 Sol
ligilIDIIIII!
11110111111!
Minuill
11ill
11111 1
111111
lei— 128,
9z
MY,
1 JAI oil 1
a
HIM
Co.
avrR
8 tit
"JI,
w id
ale
MAO

C
0
ID
75.
m oo w o
----------
...
......
.. .
.....
�2 �2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'12
22 L-
. . . . . . . . . . .
WE I
. . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
O
Bo
Gm
Ei
'5
r,
. .
CZ
6 e
2 � ", � "�
2x .2
ffi 0 a
< >
o'
M U
.4 u
Ei
uj
99
C
0
ID
75.
m oo w o

0
7-0
o
-ji
2 S,
LU 0
Z
co
2
a. E
w
.
� N ON � M
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . .
i u
O
O
O
O
O
. . I . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
0
a
iz 02
0
-,7 c>
.
> -0
=u 0 2
ig
C4 a
06
U
F 07 Sl
e40.
-0 0.
9t
0
7-0
o
-ji
2 S,
LU 0
Z
co
2
a. E
w
.

v
(D
o
. . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
o
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. .
c! c!
. . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . .
v
(D

'o 4)
Ch00
�
.2
0
d 0
Z
co oa
L) CL E
U (L
ch w 0
O
.
.....
.
......
1 U . . . . . .
.
- — — — — — — — — —
. . .
. . . . . . . .
O
CO
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
O
O
o
2 EE
Q>
U > !2 >
e
p
> .2.1
Im U, o. 85 Vim"
CIO
G ta I
L2
j u
>
916
LQ
65
Z
US
'o 4)
Ch00
�
.2
0
d 0
Z
co oa
L) CL E
U (L
ch w 0

cv
o
oN
ov
zr
10
yQ
2 ai
RF
'dAR"
ka v,c WIR
0 Ayr&
'Zil
55" y, s mm"
5. IRS
a n
'mss
lug
01,
IRAQ,
'A
t
1.
Z11 W
rtr
mlt
OF
JEr
W I. . . . . .
TIN
zf
C.
full
JIM",
dry„ Nap
5
y.
as
Aa
IN
W4
Pk'!
5y
0
MEN A
5i
�A Z
SU
16,
oon,
m m",
�gsri
1.160
"WORM r�k'�O "q 5e
t it g eir
-i
it 11 S C la SF -w-JA 9 �5
NO
g?,
T =,a U vs E 1
454 mm,
a 1 a 4 0
00
U 0
0
LL
TEO:
T
49
cv
o
oN
ov
zr
10
yQ
2 ai

qe
zr
O
O
ow,
u
q
-AWIRM
5
Mpg
M o'lw
"M oo
Ow
RO
.. . ... .
C.
4
WK,
06 "T
Dfgo,
MW�m
MR PON
A
ANI,
'w
•
A
A A
A
6
9z
ii i ol
0
ts,
A
O
A
IPA
z
A
ml
Al
Z
1p
i2
t5
t- w o 0
"i .6 4
A
A
A
A
06 M A
A
A
.2 -2
E z E 5
ry
E Z
79
o 1A m - -
- = v .2
Ei
.
zft
U. 0 g
o a r-
0
- w
U -E
�44
71 ""I,
III a
W
" mgq
ZA
qe
zr
O
O

--- -- '- -A 1. . , L . . ---
if ),
o
- - - - - - - - - -
allililill
Hill
HH! 1
11 ill
11111HIIIIII!
■
O
- - - - - - - - - -
1111111111
Hill
11111 1
Hill!
MMIMM!
I
V
VVISTS
Hill
111111
11
10111VIIIII!
--- -- '- -A 1. . , L . . ---
if ),
o

0
0
t
e
S�
v
z °r
E
u C
d �
W c
' o
° e
ccO
G G
L C�C
� C
.D Q
W .k
CO
v
sU
2 m
�: ✓
n`y �''�1�%l'.r�'�.`4., rir. °'^ �� ., vGu ^�X•
v4``:1�.;;��` `,•'::,
Fi
..
3s�y
YG••1
zl'a ", . %,v,����F,j,
y
G
N N � M 00 M M .,4,a
A rK,'s ^i
w°
"'�
�
fib`
'�z�. �•W'�p.r , ,7:;,.1 `; %"N'" � %i,`:;. �,s' vb eE
^, °`troy „' � ,.�}s "fe ';. .,,:`�a„'"�•, d�,., ,',
� �
'aN3
z- „c A,i' `
`,,,,r,,R %�yrw'y,�'c'''t
rrGG
� 7 1� M O O ,;, „�,',",
"•
�Mw';` .:.dZU^
, �- a.�- `.���•`�, �.. ;?�,,'�r"„!.,F E
°'a�v�`nv'r`ra`"s .x. .,«?'?,_<- w'r' =�"�V �.�ia�. ',si, ':xr�,,,3.v'
•�J°„c''t
M 00
10
H
�
�,,•,
rA',ryry
� ,``�i;'`�', °a�r��•`-,''Y °�� '.;� > °"��`� "faz "dt;'.'�wEr�"., ': ti`�"e;i' ✓'s �-``zs``".`'.
°. E.
' >.a•
�
!+
�'
'v�q�, -,'-;r "n P Z :F=.' � 's•�.h.: ' /Eli ^� ,
�s�
M O b ^ M O 7 t\
N
w
, ^x MM", "; ^„'1`'"
N
:_%��•
�
G
N � /� N
n N O O M n �. N sE,3
74"^i'
�
�P
.,, ” " ^X': fr f" 'q `irF. ✓\'v t.
;' ` hy5, , �a'Lf i��t,�u.q.�z„ 's,a- v �a .. ^,y; i�''d'.o-s
' -N w� ..e�y,s, �, �;:t," „�sx�,r^v;;, ��,� a,,.„ ' � �;..,,,; <,y. >'H� �`�i,;,
ss_ s; v �.- ,�S•`����y'„d'a:: ,; ��..r `. �' � 'idw`:e
4.”
-,
•'
hi
N
j;;r„',';fr
� �. [� OO � N 00 � it �
'
�
ay
"
'�'" *. ..�-° "a�`••.r^'`:�i' �.
- '..;JS�'.^.'`;r;,s„
Y,v
N v1 n /� N
W,i
f'��
,..�
.A3
sfjf�;..:ta, -'j�
's�Y �.litk'.� >:+s� ",,•�` ���e':li, u:
„ +,'•, •Y
Vl
�”
; •�
' ��
J s
'?0r'k
yR
;
�
P" ,?,� " ,,; T?''= 's'z.Ny,'Sv
✓', *� /' r'a° _, �:, pp��� ^'��,_, �'n'.`'��'QC �s xa n'';'aF�%r�;'• %.'i<
Y� • , t z>Yl %,u � �S,:r s . � �J r. ��`y ��.rb
O
�
„�
,?,y'•
Kr"
,,�r,,,v£. � �.. f'+� m1,'a'�sr� ..; syF; �' ,.�' ^'.'�.,:.x;;,,'E, `,3, r
^L
Y
U
cp
U
N
O
U�
N N M f� M •-. N
�
M .n o+
N N O\ M n M N
E�
c'i.
;�i-4
�.
u
gam.,
f., C., ^;' >rf' ra „ "�J
' ^,�+�.?': __�^�, '.; `�/ s�b'v� �.,W, %k'�^✓y; `Y3M�Y f53s/.
., ,•,. ,. w,,^,,,:; / .� sib/, °`� �
"a' ���,'�•y
§:,�
,,,+",`^•�,.
C
k
:6� ",'•-<;% e`r3 .��(,; •�'•��v-
. «E'
'fib
d
�
N t` � M O � 00 ,
;� 4:?
'f"�iYli`
f��
,y "$„•� ^ ^ik,,' °',- R� ✓i: %n;�' "'„; �v /Sr.,i'C� ; & ^�
8
%
y
Li
.,Ce'^'&�.^ 4•;:
`c,'3Y,�
Ll
Nkiil IN
06
C
U
4}L.,
rn M C O� V Q O � Ot ��
M N r Vl 00
M N
..,�.J„,, ,i �,,, w� %����•���s,�"r. �"°r
H'
.Z
".
.•,
.p `O
f''sd i, ^'j�. „
..
O M 00 N Q O •--�
a;?fi,a; 0 ";;
�
00 z ^ N "t ,
S
`�;` �' ';, �'�•� -$rw, Z „� °, fG, . �'C ' � _�, ,
c
M N .�-i � h �
n i
�
�
.4 ";,, -�, � a
' is `Y . °; ;i`"'. ^:�,?' '?w Win”
s�
,"•4,'„Ca
3
j3a'�nf'`'�
�` i i"
" ±e 3; .',fir `'�.4%��- i{'Fyr. ^; 6.'3a;;$iiia i ;•�
�q cq % t0
cO t7
^d a L Q) L1 °' _ 7;.'; r:; ^0 fl, t 6 °' 7
� `�°
❑_
CL
p
'O a t N 4 U 7 .c R y N d °' y 7
CL N 04 Q' C] �
3 � 3 Q �
C
O
Vl
3 Ca aai Ca a� � •y •G w "-�73 •� •�
o
o � rz,.� , ❑ � 0.
f�A ❑ c s °' `—'
,D
b
Q y Ca � E .v G � y ❑' � B .� � 1'
w ❑ �] c '� .. � 0.
GO a � G. � :?. W
^D
v
2'^Y, ",
�"' ^O •� � •D F G, � `�,. .;.a', .,, � � •O � � F C B `
F" w 3 Pa o c C1 y 'o
`� �+� `y m w ''
�
�.:
<,,
�"
,may
� ^p O '�" .O � Y � ` � 'O ,� •p ` G � O
ww 3 Oa o W
N
ti w
IM,w�
o
y w
Im
CA
�•xW�
�
f.
�i�f
MOt i7 7/I
�
�'�
3
0
0
t
e
S�
v
z °r
E
u C
d �
W c
' o
° e
ccO
G G
L C�C
� C
.D Q
W .k
CO
v
sU
2 m

a
0
av
00
0
Q N
d
z °r
� C
0.
W ,C
O
.G. C
O
c
c �
c
W
t U
:n
� W
".vt;
�.• .�„ "5• :<f., " "3 -a:.. d1R'.r�`:• }n'"S�•'>.:g,•�if» «x
r�;i' „�” _s�w_w�i�,f'7', -.� - i�>:.;'i�'�',�.�,'y:
..t.AP� f,G
r;VA
s >:,:
y3Y,
Y
IK
'iA
„%2�" „fit a� "'= "; B°,.r� a,•�> ;.:�. ��
y�
*E• P
” waq
,v,
�v3�s4�,.. -. ,. -:. mss`•«
@ .A
r2` ^', .
"5av
j
4TiS
Y�C
eE`i•Y/ y'h:`Oa
°2
5,l 3
13..'%?:;- •'fix ^^ /,.n•'..
F`
a
f
„
R
qa�
M r�
-
t: e' _
Y
rf
N
3t, B i9r„
f
r
aril
m
'va•{
Hx :'�>$;Y- : %';i5%�P%%a
'^"'.s:
% ✓'>,i��C-1,
f,��: <' �; ;.'•Y ,S.`�aCx
3
tax e�
:s
t• Y
`Y✓ ,
�¢� 3
max^
>
, g
„
>
t
"
c
.;yam..
+t
t
ro�
;�2a3
5b,,,,//
'
RR
A.33
x£
-�••
^@ts y,J "
-j3rj �`�
�
`-
i
SjL S
5N, «'
F�:a>.icat ..,s, �
x}
HV
d"r<yx`` -`.- _
k
M
+i�.'Sf,4„v • .g?
", `. �yL::, �vxvwr -n,. ,r i5. r,il �i > � <
"v
. »y
f
.$ •'✓'�
s
i'(`. //; '.r: >Yf �� as
:,��-���•�' rax v < rr�", ' +. =L '*,`'.` -" _
�y.P
s,�'�w
�L;•�'
�> - »�:vit'.
:i`,r; :�: �- �� ..�
•r;
`3,
jiz>
�:'
�.,I
r,n.
�e�t
4, v` '� ., �Fy < ":". '"4,': >;�� ;"\• '`3q "•�.. +.
~Ya ra,y3,a w,'y h4 .
,>�.`.
�i::�
_ia�
R}'�
-" -fps' i'm9.'`
n;,c 'y"��. �•,��.L, ^` ,' =::gib >E�vw Ra�.`�
-=fa�
Y••
,� -'r�
�,a
ts,ta•a'3>,
"�` "s
;�s:,»d >. >,�_ ^ ''�- .- ��
W
.
,�s.'=., of
tn
OF
ld
%i "" ,�
°,25 �• � �,
'•'"'S�"'''
O
O
C
t
G
r,4Yb
�;,s>i%3
f
c
C.
, > % •,wt�3„ -�� ,,3,.'
```i.,>l�.�P >,. "! i5rf' °i 'sf.4s.4.%1 • •'
�
^
"'st•Y �
• {:'
\- L -`
•L
•C
Z
�
M
O
�+
„`
N
�
tEF, �° ,s2�;Y/ -P `>>,.P.a`.•:;, .,f, ,• y,a -,
vs
/ >c5 „<
?'F,
�
L
O
•O
a
"''
7
U�
N
Y'
O _ � � N
00 M O\ v0 O Ox C N a
N N �. h M W N M
r%"
�
µ Z'
„2a:, tE r.; ::s5, n , ..
H✓E'�, " di, a; °.9' t < f, t.c
u�• `• "9 ;v," � f>5"rkG,`.i�F >'.�,.C' � v '' yam`£
?a �:
L
•�
`' ^,. :"
�t ` >a
'p
4
L
N
vt O M � Os r
N O oo
y
Jt
�`e' °n
> 3 � _.� 2t`i -�� � i. s'a;��,
s�'f vs;:'Av`•C :•�� ='` f;s
a
A A
P,
L
U
m
";3_�
=vA '> •4 -a., �`f. GB ,�* > {a-'2``�.
.
`�:,:
°::
/�,�,• �
u \;• >.�s „'7 <;f „x',� i �E�,;ata�;:9rH.,o :;'a ,
N
G
R N � W � ^ z � a N C',�
CC
.��
,�v��, �6wiLP S�\L'`\ C,+Rif - ,yq... 'K�3 .��,���•,i ",'.;t{i _ b': 'G+.`
O
N N r M Q O � O\ <'.t\
,�'
�' `�, f;d •"`• /. ` ?; i';'W., sz3a ;:?: �" - "., v'
��•. /r;r.r, "r�` "r,, ..
(�
r � O W ^ _.
�+S,.
N "J r''r \\\••."ct "r iV'`w�iV
'', "s'A��.ya.;�ta .� , y' � ,.,e x` b f''•s'��P✓ s� � �,E �
-�\,"
w•
W N +O W
M 00 n z 7 �y?>
O�
,?5"
t.=:, ,i'„Y'y�.y52vH�1?G.�*t -5, q'sr'• " "� "�
':
--�`
•
�.'
aoi '° ° A Mr„'
� Ld p„/ � rn >'Y :, .0 i"' 0.' %„' ttl (yi CG N
ar a °
Co H °' a ¢ti °' a�i
> 3 °��] °
=
a
�
o
"� °<
'. +!.�"
'�.c���3ca
m �� ° � � ` � x a � ' » "; `' � � � c � � V '� p�., .�
G 9 •O � 'O N � Qj t=tl 'z',�i`�, F. •O O � 'O U C Y ice•
u, •' `� 4�" ° t `°
�i
C
`•.�2s
'Y' -�
� a� � � '� o � 'S p°', .= � �Ci o '� o U x a .�
F. 'O °^ � fl y G "� c00 rG •O `� 'D N G � F
k" c �' m c
a°i
W ° c m "d u. .oyr
k. m b u, o
o
"
N
d
h
�
7
,
m
�
a
0
av
00
0
Q N
d
z °r
� C
0.
W ,C
O
.G. C
O
c
c �
c
W
t U
:n
� W

ov
o •
tz o
co Q
2 co
z
•"
A
: }-y :
'I
F_-
all k
i
frl
-gg, '4,0
, I
Nil
cl
A A
zn
fie,
5"
Ire,
PRO'!
00
RR,
rAll
06
A
A A
A A
.2 2 2
4) a.
"02
u 6
0 to
a=
�ol
r. -W
0 0
wm3 hm m
wm3m owm w w
L
F41
9z
ov
o •
tz o
co Q
2 co

0
t
a
O 0
O '
Q
z r
r8
U
w �
'c
[c
L �
v
c
n Q
41 u
•� U
LO
s U
:n
.,
AAS�£.
W.
�
�
WYi�
;Ti��'..�.A,- �,.����}`' i�Y es
�v.,.i
`•,>$: u£:P .:.aL sYJ>?"Y�3Jt,-
O ao O Q: O, 1
, >.'.; • .r�. ; 5..:: '.'• 'L': , ui�ve x
5.; ;`J %'✓
�`
F - $ (fix -,: .. "e.i'a;>,< -, �:= , 'd.
tUii
:�
M M � � - --
N
a,'�'�� �;x�xgaYx�:���h�,� x, "`q idw' +, " -''y �'ff ^•�.."
- .:.: i<
�
>.
CQ
� /y
iii
"�'�
:r�F` := «e",y`�'�;. ✓ �
•.i�,< =''TL'
E°��i
'
C
�
��SY,
Nyx x£_ � rvf is ay. ✓3a "r -
�'v�
,
U
N
pys
00 N V O W O,
h ,p y An M G r
N
v•�v.'rw ">s,'<,' ..5, r5 v. n;?. " --
All
,•'Sx
-; sJ' %`��r�x
x
��++
� 'R �p M — � G `x'•5iP
l•�
• ,: ,� `. "�a�xk��. `G=" � Ro�k.`°j„
$`i'- `, >Vq'.'�f :'2 r, ew,l�z rdr�'y�, "•vsxcd,i'.''Ylt etn?.�."�'
L. ✓r „ .x:.la
y1
V'
�.'�_i2>
�
1�
/'
q rir.
(, MC"f'�`i�'v...'
�"A" x , - �:s� -
`r��� ":u -'- :t ..``dK�r•..'xi '�:�'�Z�.'v� ,>�,, ^;Y� .�.,
q��yo �� •:` .s ye,i ;--:4. _:' "':" . mod•. -_ x
�>�
'Y'""
tx,.y.
In
tu
N
'9
�
,, ;" •,.'.�. n;L::.F�- c- ;;a... �^;z. x,.�'z, .;•�"r''
z *'
a0.
.�
CO
-U
WIN
O
'C
L
�L
y
�„
"y
M — r N Q O O
N N N b z N
�..
*�'-": -."fix\ :- :.•.�,' , �'
ti, °�:. ;'x; >; , ,'l" 5«, •L✓:;M'; ,j ', "'
L
U
�+
^ � � � .
x ^ii
-'"i�Z '���
°�,xx':•
b
O
•R
N
i'
L.
;;
N n �:\,
�"
' "'�
��
i��,ra
x
: j}. �. ���`• i•' yv', 4ip1§ :jN�`�%,de6ki°'t�'- `�"1•i�,s,�. - �"O;`•e •�•, .,I':.'4e.<.
°: ftl1 '•ux;`r
L
�
U
�
y
v m
N M � � oo Q O
�
VJ
m
a. 1,,a•. " �Yll .z����,w. >f"
.r4,.. F' _ �v„ ,°Rx� P >'„' -<� �• ".hx
" �' ✓�'"fF \� «� a`>„ s %'�SF''ra c "`" �' �. S °" `%
vy�a'•
,y
1�ait' .s �'
O
L
d
L
�
�
w. >:. �- `z'E'Z
- -`
Y'
�
,,Il�n.f,>'�\:. - °,. ,v •� 3•;, "',f %'7 ;.�y;s„�s,,,;r, %,'���- ` `xF'
_; °" rj4'u,.., ,;1a4:,- ot'�,�,��'� .'�•kedA,:,. p.,
OC
V
"F�`�.�
vpwi
f .�fz4'y^ ik:. -r.{ , i •4�• -� �, <'Y..: -
O
N
��c- -i oo M o, O O, -:LS
3�,� M ^ � � RO
ry
�"
kY•
is vx``j� .��, i, .;.f <,,;• �,., x,t.,
,+x�"+,Yi .: s.< ";r, ,±j :;Y - "`4,°
,a':e"
� -xi
id'"C
^ ^ ^ �.
�
d,'. "iii•''.«. ,.: ".. �'.
�^ \ ,ASV �••
>' :',3i,4 S���x
.S~����iJ2x�'. ','%£;'21 �r� >fv'��"
?`';.. •J .� cd �i R: v
°�
! ✓;'.;i';`; �L S. � .0 i0 � � m
'%;
y
E
� y� O L' id 0.: C� �"j N ;; . - L •�' a �p � 'd � 4i �j N
-
E
°' 'o a ,� aai c s :D
3Q c E °; c a;x!,:3
E Z
> >. ? •� y c .c v
Q o �.� e�
•=
b
o
c .c °o :fl aci r a fd. c s ••70
r o
'EL
p
F• G7-i A 6l
❑ U n
k LL C c0 =
F' GO c o x ry
a"
C
.. n^4.
_ N 4. C iC = N
o ux y m y c 'c� o
C
tom.
W CC
.4 •d •� G •p ` C •p O
3 m o W co o
�'�+
y� i�• C. •o •0 G M. y C 7
o
u 3 to o=
=
��+
G •C "O G •G y G •gj y •O "O L •O G •�j `
o G
y
v
w c
w
Im
141
e
�
Pi
k
t�
�
G
y
TJ
7;c.
'JP
H
to
0
t
a
O 0
O '
Q
z r
r8
U
w �
'c
[c
L �
v
c
n Q
41 u
•� U
LO
s U
:n

0
G
ov
so
o•
oN
o v
z r
v �
o^
a
w
0
c
0
co �
c_
N �
L �
C
e0 Q
CO
v y
s U
_J
5.m
'V!�.l.
4e-i
3'.+»Z�
'1i.2' -::
y��"
!1yA�
[yf
�i�:i�
�
%i ,�';"��'' "2.' :',S• .-`A '. :�,�ni\\�3. �. <- .��;e;a.- a`�D�°.:�
' "%'+,�:aY M`\ _::.. =''1§ l�x� `���1� 'h'>'/,d�f�•�� t
^,�.
�p
M
'�
�/�
3",'^�'�'
�� 7h
;;; lr,
c > "w`: Via: ,•`e'�`\ ,.'
.s ,,;ii' ' %;.,h �� ^;v ; ?SSG "�t4���C:?:• ":':'�il`,�3',�y�:
'
,°.
N
ja"
.-. ... �. n
mow:
'..t
,x
% ••'2'ta3i ;ii >�•,;;:�y. ', ay'T; �j {; ,3yrir",'`'% v -ti?i
$ 4
m
��
yy�i y; >�:'�" rv,.A,:Y /r'k ,:,'¢j <'- . � py � >{� s'"j
a"F
*d 1M::";
�vT
*1+".`•f
".
y
�p 's� �
N
:"
.. <. ,
^, v�„ %,v �� ":ra'?'£'q` "� :.T
'�,� :;y's• s -'r �" %t,;;r
r�E
tC
�p N O M 00
A
mll
�`.:::.:: "•:,;
N
C
'c'
C•
£�,s,�< '"sr'%.�S
N O O� h0 a0 O O M Oa #�,s
i`<z
.i�t�;
„ =;'y"id %'i`r''3,- ,'�.,;:,...a'; ';xr' �':a "<''n .Wa; ?.;;3'
`:'�z °� :;��i� ,`�''�' P�'s't2�:. ��`�; `xi;'''
� �.. \.%j, i. ;� <•'�',e <�T�<:' ";, %. 't;
4. -,,,,
�$f'3
NO
^ /�
d
�
•.v*, �`��.y, ".e;b%�fif'ifrci;r.3.e »iii •..i!.ft ^7:= =ii»? "gz;P<,.,x.
•x�$yw,r9, :� i,
","
[O
'<'"
Vl ^ M 1� ,� � M ^ (� 'H
C\ "v
All
h���- i^.' �ca. .� »�„�y>,i'rr.�.' ".::�:`'a<.T-x ,':YCis:)`'^1�.x� ,3i -' /-L. u,) ;�3' >J2"
svy+.
.PAZ'•
5 C
�
'},
Y^
'` ''`�
�
�
`.=I
�^
�
'"a %..
�°
�Yi''
,�.x
^f
,v -s ✓3 , 4r -•° .`'#fir• ".•�",i �iF Yi
yam,: , '>�"y',-
;q<f 6a��<_u "m'<�.'. =i• �. � �.:�'�W�,sf . L`
�
�
N
�"
t�
i� O O --•
� �" � ^ M �
?i-
�:
it
�''A� y 3y�'•.�°ZHk. �aa��' 0���
` ,SSyrW,'�'x„� 5..'-
��
^!`.i
V
Vl
�'
40
�"'=
a M a O M r V O `� E ^r<�•
,`y`"n,
ca >'•
,L ., <u"�rcry'sm��IY�
1, - z,>x. i`'r' ` .;., ti:'�' "J,ji?Y
N,S %'v �� }.5.�, -< ,:%': - -"�� � .. •i .i F;vv <y i `:^
�..'':�.r
•w:'
td
m
A
�
�sx.-',' gft% �5'y;<'� "'.i",",- �'�-'�';;'.. ��?y�`ir`.',
^
ice:
= n' .- -r
,J
`"''�
N
O
�
90
?
o N »_.,�( "A
•�
r
U
'c+
� -' .�. N N b z .-. N .
�
N •- �D � M b z N `2r.S
N
N
O
iG
~ y
<
00 V M N [� � Q O � N
N b z N .-• </
N
H
TNA
N
W� M M �� Q Q U M t
y
M M •^ Vl O � Q O � N `�'3��."'•.-
N ^ r. ;,),i
u
'%
n
..i -� v v .° .° .�... ... l ....° '�" .., �..� O •coq C .�«.
.L x fx C N 7 �. .c .n ty s y 0.� (Y. 7
a d a o d L v a
� � � c �vq a� a� c � �o
•.
- Q'.
rn
c
c
,�
'^�'''.'r''
,.
� E 'O v G v .3 O- g .g C C •2 g .�... g 2 .2q C C
•� .� CC A 'r C 0.' fi O O �- s .c CG ry .y y �
o d L d Y a d s d ffi v
a� g� � G s v ;�._ °� -.' � a� `d• c .c
�
�
A
Gy
E'
o
�n
�
LL �Cqy ctl X C
5 S 0. N - ' CL � ❑�yy is C ,C y
a) N O atl o V m N_ C t-. U Y
C ° ❑
C
y
��;yy�'
.°Kk.
LL C Q xx C y� �j L+.. G [P� id �C C � y
td 5 C F O V T. .� ,. 'Z ";h W ,y C c0 O U Ti 0- .�
d 7 i' f' ". d C
��:;�
C
N
�``�
.Y
y �`.P::^E„4 'C
O C 72 A a,Jv;�` .,y
�m °o cm v��� w3 �� $ �m �
°'
a4
�
G '$ A
�,..3 33m� �� •"v u.3 �3m g �m .v
°'
�3
rn
O
`gars
A
az>
/A
Q
�
0
G
ov
so
o•
oN
o v
z r
v �
o^
a
w
0
c
0
co �
c_
N �
L �
C
e0 Q
CO
v y
s U
_J
5.m

0
o
o
O
cu Q
100
NOW-
,, gp
zoos!
Z :2 till
MAT
RIM
1 Pill�'wsww
AMIV"
M
lip
..............
Vte`s
Fe'
ARE'
TOMF
'01
WA
MUM zz"; 1 wya
2x�
e
t, .`a
'-
°µ;
..<..° °���
C
L
r7
,:t
-�
;,l (%y ':%�y''?1,:'.rtY,.,x /
/,- "°v''.
. . . . . . . . . .
Lod q y,
15
Sky
URI
OR
1
vo Ell Do
o t -6
to, 1
S 11
im is 1 in wl SOM
I I a
t. . . . . . . . . . �,,A
luaus
iw v_
m
¢�
a b Sol
NIZE
&SO
'12
tole
am
jj
LL
0
o
o
O
cu Q

0 E
4
ea Q
2 co
YY
fr
rN
sn
Oil,t.
ax
vs"
IN!
y.
' Mli-I'll
zzrndr
iA
N
wzs
q
4r
ea
tn
10
of
c
z
C-4
SIN
IN
94
cn
as
u
cc
so
"
z
A IN
ol
z
3,
L
0
u
CIS
ON
u
C
cq
77
IN
IN
s',,
OE
12
o "S'
Im
10
0
In
to
0
"a
lw
0 E
4
ea Q
2 co

Table B.I. Stream Problem Areas
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
BCC Reach
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
11 +60
Offsite sediment.
SPA 1
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
Bed Scour /Degradation
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
BCC Reach 2
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
33 +40, Right Bank
Thalweg shifted
SPA 2
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
17 +75 - 17 +85, Right Bank
Bank slump due to lack of vegetation and no
matting
SPA 3; SPA-4; SPA 5
19 +75 - 19 +85; Left Bank
23 +30 - 23 +50, Right Bank
24 +75 - 25 +50, Left Bank
Bank erosion due to lack of vegetation and
matting.
25 +80 - 25 +95, Left Bank
Bank erosion due to lack of vegetation.
26 +80 - 27 +05, Left Bank
Bank erosion due to lack of matting.
28 +00 - 28 +10, Right Bank
29 +00 - 29 +25; Left Bank
Bare bank with erosion due lack of vegetation
and matting
30 +50 - 31 +25, Left Bank
Bare bank with scour behind log sill Cause
unknown
32 +00 - 32 +50, Left Bank
Bank slump and erosion due to lack of
vegetation and matting
32 +15 - 32 +35, Right Bank
Bare bank with erosion rills due to lack of
vegetation and matting.
33 +40 - 33 +75, Left Bank
Raw bank with no matting.
37 +70 - 37 +90, Right Bank
Toe of bank erosion due thalweg shift towards
bank.
Bed Scour /Degradation
25 +00 - 26 +00
Bed degradation due to loss of bed armor.
Upstream pool is small.
SPA 6
33 +50 - 33 +85
Upstream pool is small.
37 +35 - 37 +75
Bed armor has been displaced.
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
30 +50 - 31 +25, Left Bank
Bare bank with scour behind log sill. Cause
unknown.
SPA 4; SPA 7
32 +00, Left Bank
Scour behind boulder at j -hook structure.
Cause unknown.
Engineered Structures - improper elevations
Michael Baker Engieering, Inc ,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Contract NO. D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B.I. Stream Problem Areas
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
BCC Reach 3
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
41 +75 - 42 +15, Left Bank
Thalweg shifted towards right bank.
SPA 2
43 +25 - 43 +45
Thalweg shifted
44 +25 - 44 +60, Left Bank
Thalweg shifted towards right bank.
45 +75 - 46 +00, Left Bank
Thalweg shifted towards right bank.
55 +25 - 55 +75
Thalweg shifted.
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
48 +50 - 48 +80, Right Bank
Bank erosion where matted has been pulled up
SPA 8; SPA 2
51 +50 - 52 +25, Left Bank
Thalweg shifted towards left bank.
Bed Scour /Degradation
51 +50 - 52 +25
Riffle degradation. Unknown
SPA 6
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
53 +20 - 53 +40
Scour behind boulder tie -in Unknown
SPA 4, SPA 7
54 +80
Unknown.
55 +25
Unknown
Engineered Structures - improper elevations
54 +25
Structure was noted as being set too low
(submerged during Year 1).
SPA 9
BCC Reach 4
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
58 +00 - 58 +50
Thalweg shifted towards left bank.
SPA 2
59 +60 - 60 +10, Right Bank
Thalweg shifted towards left bank.
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
57 +90, Left Bank
Overland flow during storm event
SPA 10
59 +50 - 60 +10, Left Bank
Thalweg shifted towards left bank and has
scoured tae
SPA 5
Bed Scour /Degradation
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
58 +75
Scour behind log sill. Unknown cause
SPA 4, SPA 7
BCC Reach 6
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
77 +30 - 77 +50
Bank sinkhole from uprooted tree at rootball
SPA 11
Bed Scour /Degradation
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
Michael Baker Engieenng, Inc ,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Contract NO D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B.I. Stream Problem Areas
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UTl Reach 2
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
Bank Scour/ Raw Bank
26 +80 - 26 +95, Right Bank
Bank scour from lack of vegetation and high
overland stormwater flows from the floodplain
SPA 12
Bed Scour /Degradation
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
UTl Reach 3
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
33 +80 - 34 +15
Deposition in pool; Increase in the sediment
supply from floodplam erosion
SPA 13
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
34 +25 - 34 +80, Right Bank
Raw bank from lack of vegetation and matting
SPA 12, SPA 14
36 +40 - 36 +80; Right Bank
38 +25 - 38 +95; Right Bank
39 +50 - 39 +80; Left Bank
Bank scour from thalweg migration towards
left bank
40 +20 - 41 +25, Right Bank
Lack of vegetative matting
40 +80 - 41 +10, Left Bank
Bank scour from lack of vegetation and
stormwater flows from the Mt. Zion Rd. outfall
45 +75 - 45 +90, Left Bank
Raw bank from lack of vegetation and matting
Bed Scour /Degradation
39 +50 - 40 +00; Riffle migration &
degredatton
Thalweg undercutting nffle bed and moving
towards toe of left bank
SPA 15
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
Michael Baker Engieering, Inc,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Contract NO. D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B.I. Stream Problem Areas
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UTI Reach 4
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
50 +60 - 51 +25; Right Bank
Raw bank from lack of vegetation and matting
SPA] 2; SPA 14, SPA 15
54 +80 - 55 +20, Right Bank
Bank scour from lack of vegetation and matting
& thalweg migrating towards right bank
55 +15 - 55 +40, Right Bank
Raw bank from lack of vegetation and matting
55 +50 - 58 +50; Right & Left Bank
Bank scour and channel widemg from lack of
vegetation and stormwater Flows and riffle
migration
58 +75 - 59 +15; Right Bank
Bank scour from lack of vegetation and
stormwater flows
63 +05 - 63 +30, Left Bank
Bank scour from lack of matting to toe of slope
Bed Scour /Degradation
55 +60 - 56 +00
Upstream pool is small
SPA 15
56 +25 - 56 +60
No bed armor
57 +00 - 57 +60
Upstream ool �s small
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
Michael Baker Engieenng, Inc ,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Contract NO D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B.1. Stream Problem Areas
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UT2
Feature Issue
Station No.
Suspected Cause
Photo Number
Aggradation / Bar Formation
Bank Scour / Raw Bank
10 +25 - 10 +60, Left Bank
Raw bank from lack of vegetation and matting
SPA 16; SPA 17; SPA 18
10+85- 11 +25, Left Bank
11 +60 - 11 +70, Right Bank
Raw bank from loss of matting
12+30- 12 +50; Left Bank
Raw bank from lack of vegetation and matting
13+40- 13 +50, Right Bank
Bank slump from lack of vegatation and loss of
matting
13 +75 - 14 +25; Left Bank
Bank scour from lack of vegetation and loss of
matting
Bed Scour /Degradation
10+95- 11 +35
Riffle armor is migrating downstream cause is
unknown
SPA 19
Engineered Structures - back or arm scour
13 +75; Left Bank
Scour behind log sill due to lack of vegetation
and loss of matting
SPA 4, SPA 7
Michael Baker Engieering, Inc ,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Contract NO D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
BCC Reach 1 603 LF
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1. Present?
3
3
N/A
100
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
3
3
N/A
100
3 Facet grades appears stable?
3
3
N/A
100
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
3
3
N/A
100
5 Length appropriate?
3
3
N/A
100
100%
B Pools
1. Present? a not subject to severe a radation or migration?)
4
4
N/A
100
2. Sufficentt dee Max Pool D:Mean Bkf >1.6?
4
4
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate?
4
4
N/A
100
100%
C Thalweg
1. upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
2
3
N/A
67
2 Downstream of meander lidefinflection centering?
3
3
N/A
100
83%
D. Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
3
3
N/A
100
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
3
3
N/A
100
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
3
3
N/A
100
100%
E Bed
1. General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
1120
97
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0
100
99%
F. Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0
100
100%
G Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Height appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
H Wads/
11 Free of scour?
4
4
N/A
100
Boulders
12 Footing stable?
4
4
1 N/A
100
100%
BCC Reach 2 2220 LF
Feature
Cate o
M(per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
12
15
N/A
80
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
13
15
N/A
87
3 Facet grades appears stable?
12
15
N/A
80
4 Minimal evidence of embeddin /finin ?
15
15
N/A
100
5. Length appropriate?
13
15
N/A
87
87%
B Pools
1. Presents e g. not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
15
15
N/A
100
2 SufficienH deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6?
13
15
N/A
87
3 Len th appropriate?
L
13
15
N/A
87
91%
kDMeawnders heg
1 U stream of meander bend runfinflection centerin ?
14
15
N/A
93
2. Downstream of meander lide /inflection centerin ?
14
15
N/A
93
93 %
1. Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
13
15
N/A
87
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Re within spec?
15
15
N/A
100
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
15
15
N/A
100
96%
i
E Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
1/35
98
General
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
3/175
92
95%
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
13/390
82
82%
G Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
8
10
N/A
80
2. Hei ht appropriate?
10
10
N/A
100
3 An le and geometry appear appropriate?
10
10
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
10
10
N/A
100
95%
H Wads/
1 Free of scour?
13
16
N/A
81
Boulders 12
Footing stable?
15
16
N/A
94
88%
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
BCC Reach 3 (1823 LF)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1. Present?
12
13
N/A
92
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
12
13
N/A
92
3 Facet grades appears stable?
13
13
N/A
100
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
13
13
N/A
100
5 Len th appropriate?
13
13
N/A
100
97%
B. Pools
1 Present? a g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
13
13
N/A
100
2 Sufficiently deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6?
13
13
N/A
100
3 Length appropriate?
13
13
N/A
100
100%
C Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
11
13
N/A
85
2. Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
9
13
N/A
69
77%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
11
13
N/A
85
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
13
13
N/A
100
4. Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
13
13
N/A
100 1
95%
E. Bed
1. General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
5/170
91
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
1175
96
94%
F Bank
11 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
3/125
93
93%
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
9
12
N/A
75
2. Height appropriate7
11
12
N/A
92
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
12
12
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
12
12
N/A
100
92%
H Wads/
1 Free of scour?
11
11
N/A
100
Boulders
12. Footing stable?
11
11
N/A
100
100%
BCC Reach 4 (410 LF)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
4
4
N/A
100
2 Armor stable e. g no displacement)?
4
4
N/A
100
3. Facet grades appears stable?
4
4
N/A
100
4. Minimal evidence of embeddin /limn ?
4
4
N/A
100
5 Length appropriate?
4
4
N/A
100
100%
B Pools
1 Present? a g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
3
3
N/A
100
2 Sufficiently deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6?
3
3
N/A
100
3 Length appropriate?
3
3
N/A
100
100%
C Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
2
3
N/A
67
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
2
3
N/A
67
67%
D. Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
2
3
N/A
67
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
1
1
N/A
100
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
3
3
N/A
100
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
3
3
N/A
100
92%
E. Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
2/100
76
General
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0
100
88%
F. Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
3/80
80
80%
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
1
2
N/A
50
2 Hei ht a ro nate?
2
2
N/A
100
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
2
2
N/A
100
88%
H. Wads/
1 Free of scour?
3
3
N/A
100
Boulders 12.
Footing stable?
3
3
N/A
100
100%
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO. D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
BCC Reach 6 (969 LF)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Pedomance
Mean or Total
A. Riffles
1 Present?
4
4
N/A
100
2 Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
4
4
N/A
100
3 Facet grades appears stable?
4
4
N/A
100
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
4
4
N/A
100
5. Length appropriate?
4
4
N/A
100
100%
B. Pools
1 Present? e. g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
4
4
N/A
100
2 Sufficient) deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1.6?
4
4
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate?
4
4
N/A
100
100%
C. Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
3
3
N/A
100
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
3
3
N/A
100
100%
D. Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
3
3
N/A
100
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Sufficient Flood lain access and relief?
3
3
N/A
100
100%
E Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
1/20
98
98%
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
2
2
N/A
100
2 Height appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
2
2
N/A
100
100%
H. Wads/
1 Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
12 Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
UT1 Reach 1 (1247 LF)
Feature
Category
IMetric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Pefomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
13
13
N/A
100
2 Armor stable e.. no displacement)?
13
13
N/A
100
3. Facet grades appears stable?
13
13
NIA
100
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
13
13
N/A
100
5 Length appropriate?
13
13
N/A
100
100%
B Pools
1 Present? a not sub ect to severe a radation or migration?)
13
13
N/A
100
2 Sufficiently deep Max Pool D.Mean Bkf >1.6?
13
13
N/A
100
3 Length appropriate?
13
13
N/A
100
100%
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centerin ?
13
13
N/A
100
2. Downstream of meander lide /inflection centering?
13
13
N/A
100
100%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
13
13
N/A
100
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
13
13
N/A
100
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
13
13
N/A
100
100%
E. Bed
1. General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
G Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Height appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
H. Wads/
1 Free of scour?
3
3
N/A
100
Boulders
2 Footin stables
3
3
N/A
100
100%
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO. D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Featugo re
Cate
A. Riffles
Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
jig Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UT1 Reach 2 (1016 LF)
nes
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
9
9
N/A
100
N/A
100
9
9
N/A
100
100
G Vanes
3 Facet grades appears stable?
9
9
N/A
100
100
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
9
9
N/A
100
N/A
100
5 Len th a propnate?
9
9
N/A
100
100%
N/A
100
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
12
B. Pools
1 Presents a g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
11
11
N/A
100
Boulders
2. Sufficient) deep Max Pool D.Mean Bkf >1 6?
11
11
N/A
100
100%
UT1 Reach 3 (1885 LF)
3. Length appropriate?
11
11
N/A
100
100%
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
17
18
N/A
94
C Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering'?
11
11
N/A
100
94
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
11
11
N/A
100
100%
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
18
18
N/A
100
D. Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
11
11
N/A
100
100
97%
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
11
11
N/A
100
95
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
11
11
N/A
100
100%
3. Length appropriate?
19
19
N/A
100
E Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
1100%
2 Downstream of meander lidefrnflection centering?
18
19
N/A
95
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting. or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
1/15
98.5
99%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
19
19
N/A
100
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
2
2
N/A
100
N/A
G Vanes
2. eight appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
N/A
100
4 Free of pi2ing or other structural failures?
2
2
N/A
100
100%
N/A
100
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
12
H. Wads)
11. Free of scour?
5
5
N/A
100
Boulders
12 Footing stable?
5
5
N/A
100
100%
UT1 Reach 3 (1885 LF)
Feature
Cateqory
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
17
18
N/A
94
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
17
18
N/A
94
3. Facet grades appears stable?
17
18
N/A
94
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
18
18
N/A
100
5 Len th a ro nate?
18
18
N/A
100
97%
B Pools
1 Presents e. g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
18
19
N/A
95
2. Sufficient) deep Max Pool D'Mean Bkf >1 6?
18
19
N/A
95
3. Length appropriate?
19
19
N/A
100
96%
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
18
19
N/A
95
2 Downstream of meander lidefrnflection centering?
18
19
N/A
95
95%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
19
19
N/A
100
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
19
19
N/A
100
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
19
19
N/A
100
100%
E Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
ng or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
::L!!
F Rank 11
Activelv erodrno. wasbna. or slumoma bank
N/A
N/A
7/345
82
1 821,
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
12
12
N/A
100
2 Height appropriate?
12
12
N/A
100
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
12
12
N/A
100
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
12
12
N/A
100
100%
H Wads/
1 Free of scour?
11
11
N/A
100
Boulders
2. Fcoting stable?
11
11
N/A
100
100%
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

i
Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UT1 Reach 4 (997 LF)
Feature
Category
Metric per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1. Present?
6
9
N/A
67
2 Armor stable e g. no dis lacement 7
6
9
N/A
67
3 Facet grades appears stable?
9
9
NIA
100
4 Minimal evidence of embeddin tfinin ?
9
9
N/A
100
5 Length appropriate'?
9
9
N/A
100
87%
B Pools
1 Presents e g. not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
7
7
N/A
100
2. Sufficient) deep Max Pool D.Mean Bkf >1 6?
5
7
N/A
71
3. Length appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
90%
C Thalweg
1 U stream of meander bend runAnflection centering?
5
7
N/A
71
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
5
7
N/A
71
71%
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
2
7
N/A
29
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
2
7
N/A
29
4 Sufficient floodplain access and relief?
2
7
N/A
29
29%
E Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head cutting?
NIA
N/A
3/135
87
87%
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
5/495
50
50
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
1
1
N/A
100
2. Height appropriate?
1
1
NIA
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropnate7
1
1
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
1
1
N/A
100
100%
H. Wads/
1 Free of scour?
2
5
N/A
40
Boulders
12 Footing stable?
2
5
1 N/A
40
40%
UT1A
(85 LF)
Feature
Cate o
Metnc er As -Bwlt and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
2 Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Facet grades appears stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5 Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
B Pools
1 Presents a g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Sufficient) deep Max Pool D'Mean Bkf >1 6?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend runlnflection centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
E Bed
1 General channel bed a radabon areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cuffing?
N/A
N/A
116
93
93%
F Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100 %'
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Height appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
H. Wads/
1 Free ofscour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2. Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc ,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO. D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UT1
B 34 LF
Feature
Category
1Metnc per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A. Riffles
1 Present?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Facet grades appears stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Minimal evidence of embeddin /finin ?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5 Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
B. Pools
1 Presents e. g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Sufficientl deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6?
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
3 Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Downstream of meander lidefinflection centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
D. Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc vnthin spec?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
E. Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
010
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down -
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
F. Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0/0
1 100
100%
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
1
1
N/A
100
2. Height appropriate?
1
1
N/A
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
1
1
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
1
1
N/A
100
100%
H. Wads/
1. Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
12 Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
UT1C 78 LF
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perfomance
Mean or Total
A. Riffles
1 Present?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Armor stable a g no displacement)?
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
3 Facet grades appears stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Minimal evidence of embeddin ffinin 7
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
5. Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
B Pools
1 Presents a g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
2 Sufflcientl deep Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 6?
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
3 Len th appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
C Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend run(nflection cent ering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
D Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
E Bed
1. General channel bed a radation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
t00
100%
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Height appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
H Wads/
1. Free of our?
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2 Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO. D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
UT2
(609 LF)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Pedomance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1. Present?
7
8
N/A
875
2 Armor stable a g no displacement)?
7
8
N/A
875
3 Facet grades appears stable?
8
8
N/A
100
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
8
8
N/A
100
5 Len th appropriate?
8
8
N/A
100
94%
B Pools
1 Presents a g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
8
8
N/A
100
2 Sufficient) deep Max Pool D:Mean Bkf >1 6?
8
8
N/A
100
3 Length appropriate?
8
8
N/A
100
100%
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend runfinflection centering?
7
7
N/A
100
2 Downstream of meander lidefinflection centering?
7
7
N/A
100
100%
D. Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
4
7
N/A
57
2 Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
7
7
N/A
100
4 Sufficient floodplain access and relief?
7
7
N/A
100
86%
E Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
1/40
93
97%
F Bank
1 Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
6/165
73
73%
G. Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
6
7
N/A
86
2 Height appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
7
7
N/A
100
96%
H Wads/
11 Free of scour?
2
4
N/A
50
Boulders
2. Footing stable?
4
4
N/A
100
75%
UT3 (73 LF within
easement)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -Built and reference baselines
(# Stable) Number
Performing
as Intended
Total number
per As -Built
Total Number
/ feet in unstable
state
% Performing
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perbmance
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Armorstable(eg no displacement)?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Facet grades appears stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5 Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
B Pools
1 Presents e. g not subject to severe aggradation or migration?)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Sufficient) deep Max Pool D:Mean Bkf >1.6?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Length appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
C. Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend run/inflection cent ering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
D Meanders
1 Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant point bar formation?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
E. Bed
1 General channel bed aggradation areas bar formation
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
General
2 Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
F Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0/0
100
100%
G Vanes
1 Free of back or arm scour?
2
2
N/A
100
2 Height appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
2
2
N/A
100
4 Free of piping or other structural failures?
2
2
N/A
100
700%
H Wads/
1. Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2 Footin stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc ,
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report
EEP Project NO D06054 -D
December 2010 - Monitoring Year 2

Z
(3)
o LL
8
N 0
W
kv mc-
kr)
O
O
P.
wW
45
1.
•
8
+
LO
dq
W
kv mc-
kr)
O
O
P.
wW

Representative Stream Problem Area Photos

SPA 1 — BCC Deposition from off -site sediment
source
SPA 2 — Aggradation from thalweg shift
SPA 3 — BCC Bank Slump
SPA 4 — Erosion/Scour behind log sill
SPA 5 — BCC Toe Erosion from thalweg shift
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
SPA 6 — BCC Bed Degradation

SPA 7 — BCC scour behind J -Hook boulder
SPA 8 — BCC Erosion from loss of matting
SPA 9 — Log sill set too low
SPA 10 — Bank scour from overland stormwater
flow
. SPA 11 — Bank Sinkhole from up- rooted tree
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
SPA 12 — UT Bank scour

SPA 13 — UT Pool Filling from floodplain
sediment erosion
SPA 14 — UT Raw Bank
SPA 15 — UT 1 Riffle degradation and channel
widening
SPA 16 — UT2 Bare & raw bank
SPA 17 — UT2 Bank scour from lack of vegetation
due to poor soils
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
SPA 18 — UT2 Bank Slump

SPA 19 — UT2 Thalweg migration
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010

Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Vegetation Data
Tables C.1 through C.7
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Problem Areas Figures C1 -C8
Vegetation Problem Area Photos

Plot 92532 -01 -0001
Species Name
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date:
$ /
Taxonomic Standard:
Vibumum dentatuni
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
R
Latitude or UTM -N:
16629'
(dec.deg. or in)
Longitude or UTM -E:
532581
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
R
Plot Dimensions: X:
94.0
L
Platanus occidentalis
Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) DatasheeC
/ Irk / / Party: Role: Notes on plot: c
P. I -- I I n -fin
I57 Datum: 'NAD83 /W
coo
411 UTM Zone: U
X -Axis butting (deg): 35.20811
Y; F 10 ^ ] Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis SY is 90
ID
Species Name
1
Map Source* X Y I
char 0.1m 0.11n,
Feb 2009 Data
ddh Height DBH
1 nun Icm* 1 cm
104
Vibumum dentatuni
R
5
34.0
�,. 2
Platanus occidentalis
R
13
94.0
7
Platanus occidentalis
(
R
10
70.0
9
Comus amomum
R
8
42.0
i — 10
Carpinus caroliniana
R
4
18.0
I I
Carpinus caroliniana
R
7
18.0
(� 12
Lindera benzoin
R
3
46.0
_ 13
Carpinus earoliniana
©i
R
2
23.0
i — 14
Platanus occidentalis
ki;
R
6
50.0
15
Betula nigra
R
5
38.0
I — 16
Platanus occidentalis
R
8
41.0
_ 17
Lindera benzoin
®
R
4
38.0
( -- 18
Corpus amomunt
(
R
8
60.0
20
Linden benzoin
(
R
3
37.0
i -- 21
Vibumum dentatom
R
6
29.0
— 22
Platanus occidentalis
R
10
63.0
— 23
Carpinus caroliniana
!
R
5
32.0
( — 24
Platanus occidentalis
R
7
58.0
f — 25
Comus amomum
!El
R
6
49.0
:gees to the right of X —__ _ V
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Imm Icm* t em s rout
2,
3
*SOURCE: Tt=Tiansplant, LwUve stake 11-M i p,_r' Mao, Tu-!Titb_ling. R =bare Root, M-!My_gbm ally, U- Unknown - -- - - -- - - -- . p_ I
*VIGOR: 4- excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GMAE, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
l= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5ni and 50cm if >4m. Printed is the CvS- EEPEnny Tool ver. 2.2.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0002 Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date: / }- / IJ - / / ,
�' I Party: Role: Notes on lot:
1 Taxonomic Standard: T- . k
Taxonomic Standard DATE: P.
Latitude or UTM -N: " ! I a2151.Af t Datum: 'NAp83/W �/ S 9/1
(dec.deg. or in) oc
Longitude or UTM -E: 532550.122 _ UT Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing (deg): 35.208 I
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.Im I mm lcm* I cm Imm Icm* I cm sprout ,
-M 1-1 Platanus occidentalis
rEj)
R
9
69.0
-H 1-2 Cornusamomurn
R
6
49.0
39 1-3. Viburnum detrWip.
(�D
R
37.0
-29 2-j Betula mgra
j !
R
6
65.0
46 Carpinus carrot ana
R
27.0
3} Platanus occidentalis 404-'&'
pi,
R
73.0
Q10f Caipinus caroliniana
t i
R
30.0
33 oj.g , Betula mgia
,5
43.0
4*' -9, Betule mgra
24.0
Platanus occidentalis;
R
13
103.0
3Q" 2.11 Platanus occidentalis
R
.. 11
81.0
37-j.j'L Comus amomum
Ei
R
12
55.0
33`Z -13 Quercus rubra
R
3
22.0
4n.14 Betula nigra
i
R
3
37.0
40-4,15 Platanus occidentalis
i
R
11
73.0
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Ell
R
z
)4
91.0
42- jj.j-;t Lindera henzoin R
37.0
A4-2-Iq Caipinus caroliniana
-R
3
30.0
Cornus amomum
! j
R
7
52.0
A61--L.1.1 Platanus occidentalis
F)
R
28
224.0
.47'2,2 Betula nigr- PON
t),
R
r 5
42.0
4,9"J.-33 Viburnum dentatum
;Ei)
R
� ' 5
43.0
Ag-2; Iq Comus amomum
R
i
49.0
It
*SOURCE: -Tr -Trig" trove stalta i -Drt1l and_-_ - --
bu�lag P (±oiled,Tu =T4ibtin �baie!'I� M- -- � IJstAn
*VIGOR: 4-excellent, 3 =good, 2-fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknova
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cnt if >4nr. Printed in the CVS -EEP Enny Too! rer. 1.1.7
7
ril

[Plot 92532 -01 -0003
1 VMD Year (1 -5): ' _ ' Data
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Please fill hasty atlssittg data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheo
Party: Role: Notes on plot:
_r. rckr;rol4
dp.' Ar- t)
Latitude or UTM -N: ` i 16((29 9y19p ; i Datum: NAD 3!W
(dec.deg. or m) 532159.1657 UTM Zone
Longitude or UTM -E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): ! 35.2071
Plot Dimensions: X: ! 10 y; ­10i it Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90
- - -- - - - - - de to the ri o-
- - - -- --J
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source'" X Y ddh Height DBH I ddh Height DOH Re' Vigor* Damage" Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.lm j 1 min Icm' 1 cm Imin I cm sprout
M 3. ( Platanus occidentalis R 9 68.0i t _
11 2_Z Viburnum dentatum R _ ,6 48.0
483-1 Betula nigra E% R 55.0 -
813.5 Comus amomum (E-,) R 7 52.0
L
ag3_L Platanus occidentalis % R 9 82.0
96 3 _`4 Platanus occidentalis O R 11 93.0 E I i
W3-% Quercus rubra ? R 3 32.0 r 1
3 C� Betula nigra R 5 43.0 r
a93�'a Platanus occidentalis i, R 13 94.0 t r.!
IN 3�1
Viburnum dentatum r R 6 44.0
A3_IZ Platanus occidentalis $ . R 9 60.0
(03-13 Platanus occidentalis ( R 11 80.0
A 3 :)4 Quercus phellos Ei } � a 6 35.0
a3.I6 Ltnderabenzoin 4 37.0 `
l/ 3-i6 Platanus occidentalis 1! R 6 48-0 '
Betula nigra R Via, _a�7 61.0
03 -1% Platanus occidentalis R 15 105.0 DBH.'
ft3 .�� Platanus occidentalis (p� R 10 83.0 a
A3 Za Betula nigra b] R 7 62.0 , r�
403 =21 Lindem benzoiq R 4 43.0
41 3 -ZL Lindera benzoin :EJ R 3 35.0
111 3'L Froxinus pennsylvanica R 11 70.0
a wQuercus phellos Vii, R 6 64.0
'SOURCE: Ti =Transplant, L Live stake B =Ball and-burlap s otted, Tu- Tubling -R-bare-Root, M= Mechanically, U= Unknown p_. _ _ _ _ _ 2
'VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, 'DMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
•1 WIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >41n. Prin(ed in the CYS- EEPEntry Tool rer. 1.1.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0004 Please fill In any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) DatasheeC
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date: / / 10 / /
F Part Role: Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard: _T, Fr-kA A4
Taxonomic Standard DATE: P. L-1 0u(,
Latitude or UTM -N: 166 Ifi�:`313 _ Datmp:i V413D 3/W ; K� 81(8'r o
(dec.deg. or in) —t'
Longitude or UTM -E: 531863.5707 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 35.206
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 y: 10' ; Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 de ees tp the right of X
( gt — - $ —
Feb 2009 Data 1 THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species Natne
Map Source* X Y
ddh
Height DBH I ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char 0.1m 0.1m,
I nun
Icm* l cm Imm Icm* 1 cm sprout
*S 4-1 Quercus phellos
3
33.0; L
2S y_7_ Quercus phellos
i R
7
73.0
^ 4.3 Quercus michauxii
(P) R
8
66.0
94 -y Platanus occidentalis
R
11
80.0
`M q_i5 Betula nigra
(F; R
7
55.0
'044. Platanus occidentalis
l R
19
134.0 DBH? 7 t� 5,
W 4 -1. Platanus occidentalis
; R
7
6„ �_J
014-2 Platanus occidentalis
Ei R
12
91.0 2
N +10 Betula nigra
(U,,1 R
5
55.0
It 4.11 Catpinus caroliniana
Ei R
1
21.0
U4.15 Comus amomum
R
6
55.0 t
X14 -)1( Ilex verticillata
��, R 1d+§1i'iY�l�rtii
6
40.0
0 4-15 Platanus occidentalis
t), R
123.0 DB
1044 _ Platanus occidentalis
i R
7
50.0 IT
1P 4.,j+ Betula nigra
Fri R
7
72.0 1 i i
10 +jg Platanus occidentalis
,E j R
6
49.0
a
11111#6+R Betula nigra
� )Rr�
9
56.0 J
*SOURCE: _Tr- Transplant.L Live stake, B_ =Ball and burlap, P =Potted, Tu =Tubling, R_bare Root M =Mechanical U- Uninwwa _ _ P.
*VIGOR. 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, I *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
I= unlikely to survive year, 0 dead, ! ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cin if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CvS- EEPEntry Tool ter. 2.2.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0005
Please 1`111 in any missing data and Ax incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet
VMD Year (1-5): 2 Date:
/ / 10-1-
�(�
/ / Part :
Role: Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard:c(�art�
6
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
�), L- nL
Latitude or UTM -N: '
16631007.647 s t
Datum; ' DSMW
(dec.deg. or m)
(i j
,t D
Longitude or UTM -E:
1531726.1593
_
UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
X -Axis bearing (deg): [35.2061
Plot Dimensions: X:
H10 Y: I � [❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the rri ht of X
1
Feb 2009 Data
MENNEN
7HIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species Name
Map Source*
X Y
ddh Height DBH ddh
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char
0.I111 O.Irtt
1 mm lcm* I cm Imin
Icm* I cm sprout
895-i Cornus amomum
R
8 31.0
(?
E
to SA Quercus phellos
R
5 55.0
Z`
�i«
,.
F�
I
I
% Z�
F r�
❑
(.
L'
1#5-J4. Platanus occidentalis R 4 59.0
057 -5. Comus amomu
R
61.0
- R
•4 48 0
W 5.6 Betu a mgrs
405',A Quercus pheR° . R �4 41.0
MS -8 Viburnum dent R 4 2Z0
wjr.R Comus amomum R 11 47.0
we 5-10 Quercus.,Plaatles- /ahonvn 1 � R 8 70.0
WA 5.4Quercus rubra R 3 27,0
PW5 -I1 Betula nigra� R 11 77.0
WWjC -W .Quercus phellos © R 6 103.0 DBH?
WO 5-15 Platanus occidentalis i R 11 86.0
049S.l� Betulanigra R 13 61.0
1"OS_J}Quercusphellos R 6 55.0
W5-1& Comus amommn ©i R
i�15.lq Comus amomuuF� � R 10 48.0
y ;
1405 -71 Betula ni R 13 129.0 DBH?
ON 5-21 Quercus phellos R 9 61.0
L,;,.
; r
(i j
1
•.-
l}
E
f' ;
% Z�
F r�
❑
L'
*SOURCE: TrTransplant._L _Live stake, B- =Ball and burp P= Potted, Tu= Tubling, R =bare Rgot, fd_ M4cAtgtically,. IgtgwB_.__________
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, WSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
l= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMplcd, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CV.S -F.F.P F.ntby Tool rer. 2.1.1

Plot 92532 -01 -0006
Map
char
Please flit In any missing data and fix Incorrect data. Vegetation 117onitoring '
- -.
VMD Year (1 -5): 3 Daft
1..._
8 /) 6 / (p /
Data (VMD) Datasheet
/ Part Role:
-_:
1 66-1, Comus amomum
17 j.Z Viburnum dentatum
18..4.1: Comus amomu
94.%j Vibumum den tatumi
Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard:����fCi�
6
5
6
4
58.0
34.0
34.0
19.0
1 Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N:
:1663145.752. y ' atu'm:
slIajto
(deTM- : m)
Longitude or UTM -E:
531306.6951 1 UTM Zone:
l
Coordinate Accuracy (in):
X -Axis baring (deg): '
3!5
Plot Dimensions. X. I 1 Y. IO' L Plot has cevem aakntatton for X and Y axis - (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species Natne
Map
char
Source* X Y
0.Irn 0.Iin'
ddh
1 mm
Height DBII
Icm* I cm
ddh
lmm
Ileight DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Icm* 1 cm sprout
1 66-1, Comus amomum
17 j.Z Viburnum dentatum
18..4.1: Comus amomu
94.%j Vibumum den tatumi
ti,
Fi
� j
R
R
R
R
6
5
6
4
58.0
34.0
34.0
19.0
-
(�
Z
j
1
-
101
1'.04-5 Platanus occidentalis
1 16 -L Quercus phellos
136 -g Platanus occidentalis1
1 4 6 -Q Fraxinus pemisylvanica
1 5 6 -ip Quercus michauxiii
I 6 -11 Platanusoccidentalisi
I d -rt Comus amomum
8 Is 1; Quercus phellos
1 96iy Fraxinuspenusylvanicay
13 b -(S Quercus michauxii
13 Z -IG Quercusrubra
13 Platanus occidentalis
13 t &44 Comus amomum
13 -Z� �ornus amomum
13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
13 3 b Lj Quercus michauxii
13 6-14 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
)
i
Ei
Vii,
ti
Ei
�i
Ei
T-
R 11
R 8
R 12
R 9
R 9
R 11
R 7
R 2
R 10
R 5
R ` �
R " f ., 12
R 5
R 7
R 14
R 5
R 7
85.0
46.0
103.0 DBH?
82.0
50.0
105.0 DBH?
66.0
24.0
77.0
50.0
39.0
76.0
65.0
59.0
109.0 DBH?
46.0
72.0
Li
f t,
f. 2
_.
-
t
j
-
101
f
r .,
r
a
f l
1 r
*SOURCE: rTransnl3nt, L [-jve stake B =Ball and bgft Pf tod, TwTubli- L R = bare Root -M- Mechanically, l}-Unktwwn _ � 5
*VIGOR: 4-excellent, 3 -&ood, 2-fair, • MA AD GE. REMoval, CtM MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, MSects, GAME, UVESTock, Other /Unknown
1 =unlikely to survive year, 0 -dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeascd, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Pointed in the CVS -EEP Enny Tool ver. 2.2.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0007 Please till in any mdsaln= data and Eht hw rrM data. Vegetation Monitoring
otes on lot• Data (VIVID) DatasheO
VMD Year (1 -5): ! 2 Date: V / G / /0 / / Party: Role:
N
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: sP663$d L %71 i' i Datutn:. NAp83/w •
(dec.deg. or in) 1
Longitude or UTM -E: 530651.8484 i UTM Zone:
j Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): P203'
CC7
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: l0 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 degrees to the right of X ,
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X V j dd h Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re• Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1 nun lcm* t cm lm n Icm* 1 cut smut
1411-1 Betula nigra
,t4
R
6
71.0
t j•,j Fraxinuspennsylvanica
Et
R
19
133.0
DBH?
1 3 j -j) Catpinus caroliniana a
'Ei
R
6
59.0
I 41-J4 Quercus michauxii t
t)
R
7
61.0
1 54-5 Platanus occidentalis ' -zr�
E5
R
7
76.0
1 6-4 -� Comus amomum
inn
R
11
123.0
DBH?
t
1 7 -4-1- Quercus michauxii
ti
R
5
48.0
1 8 -4.g Comus amomum
(
R", t b
73.0
14 Acerrubrurn
R
, #0
89.0
15 '�10 Quercus phellos
61.0
15 1-11 Quercus michauxii
F;.
R
6
53.0
15 �`jL Betula nigra
R
4
26.0
I X13 Comus amomum
ja
R
8
76.0
1 54.4 latanus occidentalis
R
15
125.0
DBH?
16:-�, Platanus occidentalis
R
18
152.0
DBH!!
I 84: . j$Quercus michauxii
R
"� 4
27.0
I 4, IQ Quercus michauxii
5
58.0
1 -1.V Platanus occidentalis:,
R
~2
97.0
H I -4:ti Betula nigra
12
44.0
l l- ZI.Quercus nigra
4
13.0
I �2A Plata nus occidentalis
gi.
R
12
113.0
DBH?
M4-5 Comus amomum,
R
4
38.0
u-,conms amomum
R
10
92.0
!SOURCE: Tr- Transplant, L =Live stake, B =Ball and burlap, P= Potted Tu =Tubling, R =bare Root M= Mechanically U= Unknown _ __ _ _- - P-6
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, i ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNIWown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5nt and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.2.7
r

Plot 92532 -01
VMD Year (1 -5): (-2 Wt« g 113 //0
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Please fill In any missing data and fix incorrect data.
Latitude or UTM -N: ,,+}t63A50.5� ,A •t Datum JV D83/W,
(dec.deg. or in) "'
Longitude or UTM -E: 530390.7873 UTM Z orie:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 135202
i .
Role: Notes on nlot:
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheef;
Plot Dimensions: X: lOj y: IOI plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the_!jSht o(X_
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.lm' I nun Icm* I cm imnt Icm* I cm sprout
i
r> -. =�
( ,
,
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheef;
Plot Dimensions: X: lOj y: IOI plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the_!jSht o(X_
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.lm' I nun Icm* I cm imnt Icm* I cm sprout
L(f% $-1 Corylus americana (6d R 4 61.0
JA 8 %2, Lindera benzoin E'. R 4 41.0
.
1189 R ' 6 43.0
11►S -L� Platanus occldentalis `' E, R `3 56.0
R 6 53.0
1%�3 8•, CinAeia bertzoin'; Ei R 'g 3 34.0
I r4 6 -$ Quercus phellos R 3 17.0
Ii5 I -6j Platanus occidentalis R 6 58.0
we" Viburnum dentatum R 4 20.0
149-4' Plat�a�inus occidentalis R 7 88.0
1� Cot J' us americans R 61,0
Lindera benzoin R 3 11.0
68I - S Corylus americana �' R 7 20.0
182g�16 Viburnum dentatum Fi R 5 30.0
18384} Comus amomum ti? R 6 57.0
194g.10 Fiaxinus pennsylvanica pi R 7 46.0
1'0(8- 3qCorylus americana R 6 64.0
AV -111 Calycanthus flotidus Ek R 4 49.0
Ijfl9,L1r Comus amomum R 6 65.0
1,8g8%�i Comus amomum Ei, R 6 71.0
_
14'T.4flatanus occidentalis R 12 90.0
lXY V Betula nigra 'Ei R 7 61.0
{'
( ,
,
1,
n
`
3
)5
t 9 i
1
i
C_ -•
#
l {+ r•
t=
�
•
�
{,
f)
c<
Cx
.-
r
('11
,y `
G
1;
/
Z,
E
(,
i i i
)
Lj
C
--
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L Live staka� Ball and burlap otted,Tu=Tbinabl;�cal UU .7
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, I *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSed &GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUgtd, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool rer. 2.2.7

( Plot 92532 -01 -0009 Please fill In any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
f Data (VMD) Datasheet
VMD Year (1 -5): Date: / ;; / fit) / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
T '
1 Latitude or UTM -N: 166387 S �'4 .. .Datum; NfD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM -E: 530195.5613 UTM 7.6ne: P20
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing (deg): .
Plot Dimensions: X:
10
Y: 10 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the rijht of X
Feb 2009 Data
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map
Source* X Y
ddh
Height
DBH
ddh
Height
DBH
Re-
Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name
char
0.lm 0.1 i
1 mm
Icm*
I cm
Imffm
Ian*
I cm
s rout
etula uigra
R v
3
158.0
DBH!!
�4 n`"t
19
1AAq•1 Platanusoccidentalis
R
18
158.0
DBH!!
jlriq:j, Quercus phellos
J
R 6
69.0
�ib9.y Betula nigra
R >'5
156.0
DBH!!
1 = 6etulg uigrn
R = ._ . ,
32
151.0
DBHt!
198 -� Platanus occidentalis
R 21
179.0
DBH!!
�44} Platanusoccidentalsi
y,
8
183.0
DBH!!
ff
2^4 Cornus amomum
"
�7
76.0
2AIA Platanus occidentalis
WWI
r R
_ 9
143.0
DBH!!
'.j e,
2p2 9 =IQ Carpinus carolirriana E!
R t1
t 6
96.0
2,0q -11, Quercus phel lo
R
11
107.0
DBH?
7
G
1
Quercus P hellos;"
R 8
112.0
DBH?
�
2 ,G694) Platanus occidentalis
n
R
4
175.0
DBH!!
f
is
2969'.Itp Symphoricarpos orbiculatus i
R
8
72.0
2A.i5 Viburnum dilatatum
-i
R 4 ' '
4
65.0
2994:16 Viburnum dilatatum
Ei
R
6
30.0
2M -I } Betula nigra
R
7
104.0
r.)
i
4cl w Fraxinus pemrsylvanica
Ei
R 15
133.0
DBH?
2/Cf4q Carpinus caroliniana
(k)ii
R
1
87.0
1�k29-p Quercus michauxii
Ei
R
6
73.0
2Aq.11 Quercus michauxii
R
5
42.0.
2}4 +jL Lindera benzoin
Fl
R ,_: -
4
64.0
2,'19.23 Betula nigra
f i,
R
7
73.0
i-
2X9.aq Platanus occil 4s
E!
R
17
130.0
DBH?
;,t19j6-6 Cornus a ,. :,
(E7i
R
4
25.0
2,,149.a Viburnum dentatuni
Er
R
7
48.0
g'41 Quercus phellos
R
5
45.0
"
SOURCE: Tr- Tranlan�ltve sti e,Ba nd- burlap P =Potted Tu =Tubling, R =bare Root -Mechanically,-!J-Unknown U =Unknown ._.. - __ -___�8
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2-fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVF-SToek, Odw/Unkrwwn
I= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to loan if >2.5m and 50cm if >4111. Primed h, the CVS- F.F"PFnnp Too! ver. 1.1.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0010 Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data.
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: . 1664004:0351' 1ti1 tum:-. INAp83 /Wi
(dec.deg. or in) lj' *
Longitude or UTM -E: 529868.3227 UTM Zone: M
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis baring (deg): 35.201
votes on
'49/10
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheel
Plot Dimensions: X 10i Y:
101 Li Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the t�ht of X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH i ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0 1 i 0 ImI I mm Icm* I cm Inun Icm* 1 cm sprout
220 Comus amomum 10-1 Et
221 r Betulanigra 40.1 Q
222 Comus amomum 10
Platanusoccidentalis 10 -LI
Platanusoccidentalis la_S5
125 Betula nigra )tb -/>
226 ,Fraxinuspennsylvanica 10 --4 E%
227 Lindera benwin lo.-g d
228 Quercusinichauxii � Ei;
*0` Platanusoccidentalis 10 _ 1J (i
230 �Fraxinus Cus amomum 10 -1) �I b
rabettzoin 1p —IL (�
pennsylvanica 14) j P;
233 Platanusoccidentalis 10..14 t),
235 Platanus occidentalis 10-. i
236 '' Fraxutus pennsylvanica f0•. 1'+ Di
237 Platanus occidentalis 16 -1$ F11
238 Symphoricatpos orbiculatus 1J -19 t�
AIL. Platanusoccidentalis occidentalis !o �L 0 t4
Platanusoccidentalis 10.2, t)i
Vibumum dentatum to -2L E;
4 �t' Platanusoccidentalis 10 _ ZL4
21iis Linderabenzoin iJ_ jrs Et:
2 * # Fmxuius pennsylvanica 1o,�'a (tt)
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
6
11
5
8
9
12
19
4
6
24
14
4
7
36
6
6
19
3
8
13
4
13
4
12
57.0
162.0
55.0
81.0
69.0
146.0
128.0
56.0
59.0
163.0
99.0
58.0
70.0
232.0
76.0
64.0
184.0
50.0
79.0
107.0
26.0
100.0
t3.0
79.0
DBH!!
DBH!!
DBH?
DBH!!
DBH!!
DBH!!
DBH?
-1
/,,
U
=
e_ ,
to
7
! ,
✓ �[
J
fl
p
DID
r�
E�
S�
t�
D
GiGr
I�
)URCE Ti= Transplant, L Live stake B -B 11_and burlap, P =Potted Tua7Lbling, R =bare Root, 9
,OR. 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE. REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
likely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
issing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
iHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS- EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.2.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0011
VMD Year (1 -5): Data
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data.
VA
Role: Notes on
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet
Latitude or UTM -N: 4663442.254, 4' *','�- batum: N, P83 /W
(dec.deg. or in) tD ---�
529509.9583 Zottx
1�8 /iO
Longitude or UTM -E: I
UTM 1 1�
LLL-
--355. .2111
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis beating (degX I
�
I
Plot Dimensions: X: l0 Y
_
10 •
_ �_� Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X _
Feb 2009 Data
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID
Map Source* X Y ddh Height
Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m! I nun Icm*
DBH
I cm
I
I ddh Height
I Irmn Icm*
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
I cm sprout
247
Comusamorum 'I -%
R 4 46.3
248
Platanus occidentalis
R 8 44.5
Miami
MEM--
a
249
' , Platanus occidentalis Il_ 3 Ei
R 9 84.1
250
4 Comus amomum 11.14 ®i
R, 5 61.9
251
Comus amomum I) rj Ei
R 8 85.6
252
Betuta nigra
��..
R 5 63.1
.
254
Symphoricarpos orbiculatus B
R 7 77.1
1j
255
Platanusoccidentalis
R 8 79.9
216
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 11_10 E.
6 76.2
257
Ilcx verticillata ll _ 1 ©i
R 4 26.2
258'
ilex verticillata JI- IL 'Ei
R 4 54.9
2A
Corylus americana (
R 7 65.5
i
L�
260
Comusamomum I I- I y pi
R 4 41.5
261
Comusamomum �I_IS
R 4 55.2
262
Betula nigra 1 _ I6 E,
R 8 65.5
263
Comusamomum !I- I
R `` K "' "6 60.7
264
Corylus americana ' I I J
R 5 49.4
265
Comus amomum 1 �- I Lj j
R 5 62.2
266
Platanus occidentalis I I -Zp Ei
R 9 90.8
6� Platanus ocmde,xtabs
t
R 10 100.3
DBH?
I
) 71
s_ OUR - ToTrans&nLtr "ve stak M -yia P-- Potted, 7e - Mebting, It-base Root M =Mcchamcally, U Unknown .- - -_ -_ - -- -- - _ V ,
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3-good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, UVESTock, OtherAJa *Ph
- unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, AN [Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DIF �_up
M =missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. M �b
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10ctn if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP

Plot 92532 -01 -0012
jVIVID Year (1 -5): 2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
i Latitude or UTM -N:
j
(dec.deg. or in)
Longitude or U y
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
l 1,2 l to
Please fill In any missing data and fix incorrect data.
Party: Role:
Notes on n
C_
166407'(,4265, iF)Atdrh: ',NAD$3 /W j
'529194.0351 UTM ZonP�35199
X -Axis bearing (deg):
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet,
10 1�
10 Y: r 10 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y airs Y is 90 de es to than of X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DISH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1 m 0.1 m . I nun 1 cm* I cm I mm i. * I cm sprout
268 Viburnum dentatum j - j FI R 4 32.6
270 Viburnum dentatum �,j) R 4 28.0
271 Viburnumdentatum Z_ Fi: R 6 45.4
2722 Fraximrs pennsylvanica/ 2.-15 (E) R 8 67.1
273 Platanus occidentalis JZ, -6 Ei R _ , -_ . 5 68.0
274 Frexinus pennsylvanica ( l R .; 65.8
275 Corylusamericana )Z -g Ef R $ 68.0
276 Platanus occidentalis 12 -q (E; R 60.0
277 Betula nigra Fi R 69.5
278 Platanus occidentalis I L-� ( R 60.0
279 Comus amomum 1 L -1 L ti R 5 49.1
280 Symphoricarpos orbiculatus i L -i) „R 3 55.5
281 Platanus occidentalis ( 1- 114 4 41.1
282' Platanus occidentalis ) L -' S R 62.8
283 Comus amomum 1 L- �(� Ei R 5 56.1
284 Platanus occidentalis R 5 569
285 Betula nigra Z -) Si R A 42.7
xia -xzs.
286 , Platanus occidentalis �'�_ (q fir R �` 7 58.8
287 Calycanthus floridus 0 I:( R 4IdW44000jj� >3 31.4
288 Ilex verticillata- Z R 65.2
289 Comus amomum , 2 LL gr R 3 40.5
If
V% -
E
J` i
_J
'E
*1
F
��
f
*SOURCE: Tr- Transplant, IrLive stalt� i3� ! flap, P= Potted— Tu =Tublin& It =baMRoot, M =Mechanically, U Unknown
*VIGOR: 4 excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, I *DAMAGE: RFMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1 =unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Homan TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane. DlSeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in Me CVS- EEPEnhy Tool ver. 2?.'
Y

Plot 92532 -01 -0013 Please fill in any missing data and fix Incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
VMD Year (1 -5 2 'Date: / � / J / / Data (VMD) Datasheet
) 8 / t " / Part : Role: Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard: j
Taxonomic Standard DATE: P. Lr vt G
Latitude or UTM -N: 1664}10. atom: i" 18" L"1 d j �t0
(dec.deg. or in) "QO
Longitude or UTM -E: 52>s159.74E UTM Zone'
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Ax(a bearing (deg): 135.196
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 19 _� Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 9A degrees to the right of X
� — _____
Ma * X Y
p Source
ID Species Name char 0.1111 O.lm
Feb 2009 Data
ddh Height DBH
8
I mm lcm* I cm
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- * *
8 Vigor Damage Notes
lmm Icm* t cm sprout
290 Betula nigra 1 '3 .- ( Vii) R 3 18.0
291 ' , Comus amomum 3 _ Z Ei R 8 76.0
292 * Comus amomum 13 _ Pi R 8 70.0
293 Carpinus caroliniana 3. 7 :E? R 6 57.0
294 Carpinus caroliniana 1 -5y R 5 55.0
295 Comus amomum 3 , 6r R 7 79.0
296 Carpinus caroliniana 3_ ! .R 7 72.0
297 Betula nigra 13 -$ ti; R 4 88.0
298 + , Platanusoccidentatis R 6 62.0
299 Comus amomum 3 -�V Ei R 10 103.0 DBHffil
300 Betula nigra R� 81.0
301 . Corms amomum P -1 L 1s R 9 84.0
302 Carpinus caroliniana i 3 _' R 6 72.0
303 Viburnum dentatum 1 3 - l y E, R 7 57.0
304 ` j Platanus occidentalis 1.3 +5 t� R 3 24.0
305 Carpinus caroliniana R l 14.0
306 Platanus occidentalis ' 3 R 3 18.0
307 Carpinus caroliniana /� igi R 6 67.0
309 Viburnum dentatum R 7 65.0
310 Comus amomum 3 -'2, I E5 R 7 52.0
2r
J
!
't
-z
2
1
—
✓
x
J
E
r/
P
t l,t
{ In l
t l
❑
t.`
c.
3
t �
"t
Lj
y
;
j
n F
�;
*S.OURCBSr=JSar—ps lent L,�,ive stake -Ball and burlap, P- ed. u- Tublint. R-bare Root. M- Mechanically. U =lktktawn _ _- _ _ p. 12
*VIGOR. 4- excellent, 3-good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
I= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >41n. Primed in the CPS -EEP Entry Tool rer. 2.2.7

Plot 92532 01 -0014 Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
VMD Year 1 -5 : 2 Date: / :� / p / / Data (VMD) Datasheet
( ) _ �3 I Part : Role: Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1664553.140. lbatfiin: 4jAD$3/W fRl f�v
(dec.deg. or in) ' °O
Longitude or UTM E: 527679.835 UTM 'Lone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 35.195
__
Plot Dimensions: X: 1 Y: 10 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 dSFem to the rigk *(X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH j ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
MD Species Name char 0.1m 0.Inn I nun Icm* 1 cm Imm lcm* 1 cm s rout
-
Ilex verticillata
®
R
5
69.0
312
Ilex verticillata It,','L
hi
R
8
91.0
313
Comus amomtun ILO
m®m®�
R
8
73.0
314
Carpinus caroliniana L !
Vii,
R
3
26.0
315, ' ,
Viburnum dentatum 't,� �
®
R
5
53.0
Platanus occidentalis
Fi
R
6
71.0
ANINOWL
Cornus amomum R
9
85.0
318
Ilex verticillata 14_
1Vjt
8
61.0
319
Carpinus caroliniana 1 _ 1
27.0
•3 ;0
Viburnum dentatum ' y —� p
i
R '"
3
41.0
321
Carpinus caroliniana , (,mot'
R
4
42.0
322
Platanus occidentalis iLt _I Z
E;
R
5
53.0
323
Ilex verticillata f �_ t 3
R
5
81.0
325
Platanus occidentalis/4_1 S
E
R
7
82.0
326
Comus amomum ( 6
iii
R
6
82.0
327
Ilex verticillata /L ��.
Vii.
R
5
43.0
328
Betula nignd /'y_'�
�
R
8
82.0
330
Platanus occidetualis y_ Z p E,
R
5
60.0
-
®
®
®
- - --
=
=
®
®®
®
m®m®�
®®®®_�
®
m®®m�
®®_
�n
■
mmmm_©
*SOURCE: Tt= TrflnsDI t, 1= -Live stakeL1 =Ball and burlap, P= Potted, Tu =Tubline. R =bare Root, M= Mechanically, U= Unknown p _I3
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESToek, Other /Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specily other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CPS- EEPEntry Toot rer. 2.1.7

I'Plot 92532 -01 -0015 Please fill In any missing data and fix Incorrect data. Vegetation 1lionitoring
Data (V,'11D) Datasheet'
j VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date: g ft) / h-t
i Taxonomic Standard:
(j Taxonomic Standard DA "I-E:
I Latitude or UTM -N: 16599C5.8A2 t v. , D'atum: 'NAp$3/W
(dec.deg. or in) �� °}-- I
Longitude or UTM -E: 526547.6359 UTM Zone ' U
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing (deg): f 35.1911
Notes on lot:
Plot Dimensions: X: 101 Y: 10 ; Plot has reverse orientation for X anY Y 90 degrees to the-right of X
*15Ql1RCE: Tr- Transplant, L= Live stak -g -fli-BkN _andburlap, P- Potted, TwTubling, R -bare Root, M =Mechanically, U =Unknown _ ._ p. 14
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, ! *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M =missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >41n. Pointed in the C6S -EEP Enity Tool rer. 1.1.7
Feb 2009 Data
i
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source* X Y
0.1,n 0.1m
ddh
1 ,nm
Height
tcm*
DBH 1
1 cm
I ddh
1111111
Height
Icm*
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
I cm sprout
331
Hex verticillata ) 5,. (
R
5
50.9
n
332
Ondera benzoin s- L
Er
R
4
12.5
V
pe
333 '
Platanusoccidentalis 13-3
E,
R
5
45.1
334
Betula nigra /!5 - L4
Er,
R
4
51.5
335
Comus amomutn C►,
(0,
R
5
46.0
j
536
Lindera benzoin 15 ,G
Ei:
R
4
31.4
_..
337
Betula nigra ' S)
R
3
39.6
)
r
338
Carpinus caroliniana
E,;
R
3
44.5
339,
Lindera benzoin S. q
(E-),
R
2
4.0
i
340
Platanus occidentalis 15 -1 J
ti
R
2
32.0
_
r
341
Betula nigra
(FR
3
32.3
-
342
Quercus phellos 1;! -17
Ei
R
7
52.1
344
, Quercus phellos 1.,5�_ JAq
V
R
4
58.2
J
t� ct
�._
r
345
Quercus nigra
'Ei,
R
4
55.5
IT-11
346
' Quercus phellos JS -'
t),
R
4
70.1
*15Ql1RCE: Tr- Transplant, L= Live stak -g -fli-BkN _andburlap, P- Potted, TwTubling, R -bare Root, M =Mechanically, U =Unknown _ ._ p. 14
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, ! *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M =missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >41n. Pointed in the C6S -EEP Enity Tool rer. 1.1.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0016 i7e211e Otl In any missing data and fix Incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
VMD Year (1 -5): ' Date: /0 lo - / / n� n ^�^ Data (VMD) Datasheetl
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1660031.749't a ',c;'! Datum: NA9,83 /W ,
(dec.deg. or in) "tea
Longitude or UTM -E: 326637.7563 J UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing (deg): ! 35.192
- - _-
L Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ( plot }yam reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
t Feb 2009 Data r- - - -- - - - - --
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vi or' Dama e* Notes
ID Species Naine char O.Im 0.lm! I mnr Icm* 1 cm Imnl Icm* I cnt sprout g g
347 Comus amomuin 6-
j
348 , ,,Platantis occideittalis ���
®i
Lindera benzoin
Ei
Carpinus caroliniana L/
I&
anigia ���
1rS
/S
ata 6- b
ti
b, lL
,Betula nigra
359 Comasltomum 16_I�
Ei
la itigra ) 6 _I y
r �Betulanigra
Comusambmuin
363 ' Fiaxinus pennsylvanica 1 )�
Fi
364' , Platanus occiden(alis
365 �• Vibumum dentatum �!/ _ /J�
!�
Et
366 Platanus occidentalis �b _
t),
367 POmusamomum �6 ►L)
E
*SOURCE - -- � - - - - -- . —_ - -- __. -
TrTrans last L Live stake B =B II and buria P- Potted Tu=Tublin ba _ --
'VIGOR 4 =excellrnt 3 ood, 2 =fair, - - -- k�— - �`Rs L�Root -M - Mechanicallv,_U =Unknown �, IS
t- unlike) g *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
Y to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M= missing.
HEIGHT Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
HT PRECISION drops to IOcm if >2.5in and 50ctn if >4m.
Printed in the CVS -EEP Entry Tool rer. 2.2.7

Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Plot 92532 -01 -0017
_ Data (VMD) Datasheet
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date: g / ( D / J - / / Party: Role: Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard: 'CA F
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ;
1 Latitude or UTM -N:
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM -E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
1660252.¢63 iv , "" n: . D$3/W I EUTit
i , l efto
526651.9064 ' UTM Zone:
X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 35.192
10 Y: IU I :r ' Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2009 Data 1 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ( ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m I mm Icm* 1 cm ( Imm Icm* l cm sprout
K 6 66.8
3694 flex verticillata -Z R 4 52.1
37a Betula nigra j!�._ R 3 55.5
371 Comusamomum L+ ! R 6 61.3'
372 • Platanus occidentalis )4 -5" (ED R 10 63.7
373 Quercus nigra) R 4 39.3
374 + Platanus occidenrnlis t Q R 4 44.5
375 Quercus nigra R-9 i.. R 5 59.7
376 Catpinuscaroliniana )- 3 33.8
377 Catpinus carolimana l 7,- I'D 4 38.1
378 Platanusoccidentalis -�� ©i R� .-� 5 52.4
379 Platanus occidentalis„ J, R 8 63.4
380 Platanusoccidentalis R 10 81.4
381 Carpinus caroliniana 1 :7 -ly Ei R 5 46.3
382 Platanus occidentalis r �_ I /!) ®i R 6 62.8
383 Platanus occidentalis 1:7 -l6 tr. R 5 56.7
384 Quercus nigra - Et R 4 55.5
385 Betula nigra _I E; R 7 57.9
386 Calycanthusfloridus �'t _j� ( R 5 23.5
387 Platanus occidentalis. �p �n R" 4 354
388 Quercus rubra '� L ( R 3 33.2
389 Platanus occidentalis 1�,2 j_ Z R 4 50.0
f
, l.,t.
❑
�
�1
y
»J
�- l
✓
(
2
S
r
(Q
i f
J,
J
�/
J
❑
/�
,/
n
f (
1
hJ
L -(
�
if
3
•SQVRCE: Tr -bran lam L= ive� take, B =Ball and burlap, P =Potted Tu =Tublin�R =bpro Root. !� echanically-U_Unknown _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ P_- 16
*VIGOR: 4- owellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. I Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CIIS -EEP Enn0' Too! rer. 22.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0018
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date: g / �,� / jo /
Taxonomic Standard:
jTaxonomic Standard DATE:
I
Please till In any missing data and fix Incorrect data.
—__I
j Latitude or UTM -N: 1 61 ,407.41,? I 4 +Daititn, NA 8 }lW
(dec.deg. or in) n
Longitude or UTM -E:
527015.0198 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 35.193
_ —_.�
Pa Role:
G , Et karJ4-
. LVAck
k
Vegetation Monitoring I
Data (VMD) Datasheet!
Plot Dimensions: X: I0, Y: I 10 �� plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 de ees to the ri ht of X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notel
ID Species Name char 0.1m o.Iin I mm Icm* I cm Imm Icm* I cm sprout
390 . Quercus phellos R 3 47.2
391 Lindera benzoin JS- L E, R 3 4.6
392 Quercus nigra $, iED, R 4 64.0
393 Betula nigra J$_,l4 �t R 7 70.1
394 Coniusamomum R 4 52.4
395 Comus amonmm �O ^� Ei R 5 51.2
396 . Lindera ben7oin 1 g. R 3 50.9
397 Comus amomuin /'{�8 �O El R 5 57.6
398 Betula nigra !b "�O (j R 3 53.6
399 r Quercus phellos S, �0 Ei R 4 45.7
400 Quercus phellos 0 R . - -� 4 59.4
401 Carpinus caroliniana le -IL Fis R v " 2 18.6
402 Quercus phellos ���� R 3 18.6
403 Betula nigra Et R 3 54.6
404' Betula nigra f 8 . { S R �s' 6 56.7
405 Quercus phellos X „ J 6 Ft R 3 44.5
406 Platanus occidentatis , ''1 (l R 5 42.7
408 Platanusoccidentalis jq,j 1 tti, R 6 66.8
Betula nigra g (E) R 6 64.0
wl-
s x
V�1 .
0
J
J
l
�r
�-
—
1.
��
r ;;_
-
l`
C
L ( 0
(_
El
1.1
r
' Tr�Transplant, lr Live_stake B -B land burls p =Potted P91-R bare Roo;M= Mechanically. U= Unknown _ _ _.--- .__._.p• 17
4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, s _ *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
to survive year, 0 =dead, I ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
9. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
'PRECISION drops to to,, if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CIS -EEP Entry Tool vet. 1.1.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0019
Please till in any missing data and fix incorrect data.
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) DatashetG
VMD Year (1 -5): L I Date:
/ 1�
/ I'>
- /
/
Par :
Role: Notes on lot:
Taxonomic Standard:
1LaJ^�
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
P. t
Latitude or UTM -N• �` 'i,*6I620.441
r <',t:• +I 6itum::'NA,.D83%W
g
(dec.deg. or rn)
527433.5076
Longitude or UTM -E:
�'
UtM Zonb:
i Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg):
1 01
,
; 33.194
� Plot Dimensions: X: ', 10 Y:
� � � � Plot
has reverse orientation
for X and
Y axis (Y
is 90 degrees to the
tight of X
Feb 2009 Data
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y
ID Species Name char 0.1in 0.1in,
ddh Height DBH
1 nmi Icm* I cm
ddh
Itmn
Height
Icm*
DBH Re- Vigor* Damagc* Notes
I cm sprout
410 Platanus occidentalis /9-1 E
R
10 100.0
411 Betula nigra f� Z
R
2 51.8
[�
n, r
412 Betula nigra ) Q E�
� +
414' Platanus occidentalis , 1 -15 (E,
R
7 59.7
i
!
-
415 Corpus amomum 9 _G Ec
R
5 43.6
1
V/
416 d Carpinuscaroliniana l� -3
R
3 55.2
(tfc
l
417 Fraxinus pennsylvanica �" O E;
R
4 37.8
•41$ Platanus occidentalis
R
13 168.3 DBH!!
419 Betula nigra / D Ei
!
R
11 114.3 DBH?
420 Ilex verticillata
�� ! /
R
5 52.1
-�
421 Platanus occidentalis �6�Ill� ;E�
R
7 85.0
7
4221 Catpinus caroliniana 1 13 (
/it;(
R
2 15.5
C -I
4234 Fraxinus pemrsylvanica j3 E;
R
10 85.3
r
424 Platanus occidentalis !!� rE)
R
11 117.3 DBH.
V
I i
425 Platanus occidentalis Gi
R
3 16.2
J
427 Carpinus caroliniana ,�/ _I Q ©i
R
3 25.6:
428 Platanus occidentalis 1 (� q Ei
R
8 96.0
e
429 Betula nigra I q 2�
R
7 64 9
C
�j
430. QuercuS phellos //� - Z f E
R
5 40.8
*SOURCE. TifTtansRlant,jr--Lir C. and burlj!!, Potted, Tu Tubling,- R= bare_Root _M= MechanicLy.M= Unkno_A_ __ , ._ -_ — _ _ p, 18
*VIGOR 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWmg, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANw1al, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CISEEPEnIty Tool rer. 2.2

Plot 92532 -01 -0020 Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet
VMD Year (1 -5)• 1 2 1 Date: / 10 / CJ - F _// 12 1 •
i
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1662045,131-?'. ► t:Datum: , NAD83M
(dec.deg, or in)
Longitude or UTM -E: 527430.2246 'UTM Zone
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing (deg): 35.19J 4'
—
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y; plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 Te es to the ri of X
Feb 2009 Data j THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.Im O.Im 1 mm lcm* gcn Imm loin* I cm sprout
51.5
�� 3 36.6 `( V
4 •O- Z ,Fi R i
433. ' 3 Fi R 5 51.2
4 34 Quercus phellos �= I„�i R 4 41'8
N {
436e" `; Carpirius caroliniana " , ; � R 3 22.6
437 r Betula nigra 2.b _4 (Ei R ` 5 46.3 -
438 044 us phellos �j �O (p R 5 49.4 '
439 Betula nigra w ,p1 Fi R 6 57.0
440. • Betula nigra (i R ° "`r5 57.3 `
L�
441 Carpinus caroliniana ZD _ El R W,'F 2 31 I
442 Platanus occidentalis -12 f
R .• • _"4 52.7
443 Quercus phellos 20 3 Es R 9 75.0 Do
444 Vibumum dentatum Z,) r LI (�p R 2 21.6
445 Quercus phellos ^,'� ;Fi R 0 1.5 C6R,1Ga,
S�`CM
446 Lindera benzoin 2z t (Ei; R 2 35.1
447 Quercus phellos Fr, R 6 82.3 �1 �� �� d
KCE_TraTransplant, L-Live l bur p. P�Potted,. -TtgTauing R bare Root, M- Mechanica)ly - �Unknowp _ _. P. 19_
- -- — -
)R: 4= excellcnt, 3 =good, 2-fair, �A-.N]Mal. DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LfVESTock, Other /Unknown
kely to survive year, 0 =dead, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
ssing. Strangulation. UNKNown, specify other.
'HT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP Entry Too! ver. 1.1.7

Plot 92532 -01 -0021
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
i
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: .1
Please fill in any missing data and fix incorrect data.
Party: Role: Notes on ph
1. ee-k o-,-d -I-
0
JqI Fa
Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet
(dec.deg. or m) 527798 7472 UTM Zdne: r
Longitude or UTM -E: _
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bowing (deg): 35_195
Plot Dimensions: X: !0' Y: ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
f 1:, �/ C� -10 L
—_ —_ --
*SOURCE TrTranaRlanlr Live stake. B =Bala and burls P= Potted, Tu- Tublin R_ =barefoot. M= Mechanical UUnknown_
*VIGOR 4= excellent, 3 =9 ood, 2 =air. *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER RODents INSects, GAME LIVESTock Other/Unknov
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISear
M= missing, Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the C4S -EEP Eutr
I
Feb 2009 Data
THIS YEAR'S DATA
1
Map
Source* X Y
ddh
Height DBH
ddh
Height
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID
Species Name
char
0.1rrt 0.1m!
I mm
Icm* t cm
! Imm
Icm*
1 cm sprout
IW48 ;'
, dera benzoin
n
R
5
39.9
I J
449
Viburnum dentatum Z� _2
Ei
R
5
24.4
0
l0
Quercus nigra 2l _
1
E,
R
4
50.3
`--
f
451 '
Quercus nigra 'Z) _ 1 {
j i
R
4
35.1
452 ,
Fraxinus perotsylvanica
14
118.6 DBH?
%453
Comus amomum 2-1.6
ki
R
6
76.5
�4
Quercus nigra 2(
i
R
5
40.2
455
Quercus phellos ry( _ g
Ei
R
6
50.3?*
456
r
Comus amoinuni
R
5
50.0
457
Ilex verticiilata
'Ei;
R
6
58.8
458
Quercus phellos 21 —k
(F)
R
7
60.4
459
Viburnum dentatum - 1
R
4
25.6
z
460
Platanus occidentalis 21 —k 3
Ft
R
5
68.3
Lj
461
FraxinuspennsylvanicaZ'_jy
ti
R
7
65.8
462
Lindernbenzoin Z(—I
R
5
82.0
'
463 `
Ilex vetticillata Z' _` 6
1
R
4
50.9
y '
464
Viburnum dentatum _
Vii)
R
4
38.1
l
465
Vibumum dentatum 2' —`
R
4
39.6
466
Comus amomum L�.. �Q
(
R
7
81.4
467
Fraxinus pennsylvanica ZJ —2_0 0
Ei
R
11
92.0
468
Comus amomum
Q
R
6
57.9
�
r
f 1:, �/ C� -10 L
—_ —_ --
*SOURCE TrTranaRlanlr Live stake. B =Bala and burls P= Potted, Tu- Tublin R_ =barefoot. M= Mechanical UUnknown_
*VIGOR 4= excellent, 3 =9 ood, 2 =air. *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER RODents INSects, GAME LIVESTock Other/Unknov
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISear
M= missing, Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the C4S -EEP Eutr

1
Plot 92532 -01 -0022
VMD Year (1 -5): 2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Please till in any missing data and fix incorrect data. Vegetation Monitoring
Data (VMD) Datasheet
1' Party: Role: Notes on plot
j Latitude or UTM -N: 1663364.256 i Datum: �NAD83lW
(de m) 527856.6138 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM- TM -E: _
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis b wkS (deg): f 35.1951
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 1 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2009 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes I
1D Species Name char o.Iin 0.Im I nun Icm* 1 cm Irrun lcm* I cm sprout
Betula nigra t R 4 61.0 ( _ ✓'
472 Betulanigra �2 (Pj R 4 54.3 �]
473 Platanus occidentalis 2Z- y
El
R 8 70.1
474 Ilex verticillata Z�� C,' R 6 74.4
476 Ilex verticillata jj. R 6 67.4
477 Quercus phellos 2Z_� (Fj R 6 61.3 1
I
478 Linderabenzoin R 6 61.0
479 Viburnum detrtatwnZ2_1 ( R 4 26.2
480 Quercus michauxii Z
2-1 " R 6 63.7
1 �
481 Ilex verticillata Z ©i R 4 52.7
482 Fraxinus pemisylvanica -2 L 7 : 1; R 6 29.0
483 Comus amomum -L2 _ 1 1 1 1J ,Vi R 5 61.0 '
�g4y 22— cj l � R 4 59.4
ata ZZ - f �j n R 5 52.7
L78 Quercus michauxii Z2_ 14 Fy R 6 65.8
Quercus phellos 2IL--1 R z. ' "4 25.9 Comus amomum 2Z _1l R 6 65.8
:.iltutulndentatum z- 3 25.0
h�-
l FlJ t`
plan L: Live stak �B =B- II an burlap, P= Potted. Tu =Tublpg.R -bare Root. M= Machanically U= Unknown _ _ _ �p. 21
t, 3 -go4 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESToek, Other /Unknown
year, 0-dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, Diseased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
IN drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP Fray Tool ver. 2.2.7

ID
(Plot 92532 -01 -0023
491'
VMD Year (1 -5): 1 2 } Date: >
492 `:
Taxonomic Standard:
493'
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
494'
Latitude or UTM -N: j66§4
l
(dec.deg. or in)
494 s
Longitude or UTM -E: 15282!
497
Coordinate Accuracy (m): C
1
Plot Ditnensions: X:
ID
Species Name
491'
LJ.06 benzoin a 3
492 `:
Ilex verticillata a 3 Z
493'
Lindera benzoin
494'
Betula nigrd 14
495
Betula nigia _ C>
494 s
Betula nigra
497
Viburnum dentatum a3 -4
498 ,
Quercus michauxii 2.3 -9
499
Viburnum dentatum a3
500 '
Quercus phellos a3 h
502-
Betula nigia
&W3'
Quercus nigra
4 "
Ouercus michauxii 3
505 , an
5(t 6
michauxii S
Betula nigra
8
�Comusamomum
09
Fraxinus pennsylvani
!0
Quercus phellos -
R 4
Quercus nigra 'L
514
Lindera benzoin
/(J
Please till in any missing data and fix incorrect data.
ElParty: Role: Notes on n
1 Y_
19.987 UTM Zolte:
X -Axis bearing (deg): P35.1961
Vegetation Monitoring',
Data (VMD) Datasheet
101 y; I 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
-r ,
*SOURCE: T Transplant (rLive stake, B =Ball and burlap, P= Potted, Tu =Tubling`R =bare Root .M= MechAnieativ, l_Unknown _ _ - - - -__ _
' *VIGOR: 4 -excellent, 3-good, 2 =fair, � *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWmg, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, OthWUnknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0= dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if >41n. Printed in the CVS- EEPEno-v Tool ver. 2.2.7
Feb 2009 Data
i THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map
Source* X Y
ddh
Height
DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage" Kota
char
0.11n 0.1m
1 nun
lcm*
1 cm I
Inun Icnn* I cm s rout
EI
R 4
62.2
—
R 3
44.5
E!
R 4
57.9
R 7
42.7
Ei
R 7
33.5
-
R 6
55.8
-
I
1 l
R 5
59.7
R 6
35.1
E',
R 5
61.0
(u
R 6
54.3
�t
Ei
R ' �7i 10
97.5
(J
R Z3 _) 2 8
101.2
DBH?
F1
R �3 -1y 6
75.0
�t
R C 4
53.0
j
J
E,
R 23 �t 4
46.6
rE'11,
R _Ill 11
139.6
DBHY
I ,E,
R a3 _Ig t I
126.2
DBH?
R a_� 1Q 13
100.3
DBH?
i
E,,
R2_3 4
58.2
(t)t
R2_� _2I 5
53.0
-
jDi
R a3 -ay 3
36.9
-r ,
*SOURCE: T Transplant (rLive stake, B =Ball and burlap, P= Potted, Tu =Tubling`R =bare Root .M= MechAnieativ, l_Unknown _ _ - - - -__ _
' *VIGOR: 4 -excellent, 3-good, 2 =fair, � *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWmg, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, OthWUnknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0= dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if >41n. Printed in the CVS- EEPEno-v Tool ver. 2.2.7

0
o Q
0
ca �
o d
Z �
U �
d
� a
i'l co
� C
0
cb °
G
d 7
oq
C
L[] Y
`v
m �
u U
� m
C
v
N
V
O
R
3
A
C
R �
7
C X
V �
� � R
L
V
a U
� r
L•
O O "
R
° ° F `o
R U i G V
V
C
s
X y E N C N
to
b
= y O>> N a a Q
I
U C U
C
to
O O
L N
A
O
N
a m
?) G O
a 1 W N V W N -,
h .� s Q' O'
C
U O .O
�
y0
N N N
U v
F Q W W .-a w w .a Q
o• C1 cG ?� -- N N
Pa
W
V
R cn
iTi
x a
�
�o
x
� �
°'
L
°' •' E
O E a _ �
N N
� d
U
CL
U U Z
U
o y
u
a s a
R ° s no en en
U m a o `o
`� `u `u E R e a
R y0
d R
E Y
N
E E E
W d ti •` s °° °° R R R R
O"
CL L •y d> O L L
99z
o o u °t
A�aaw »AAAa
as aAfi�= � RcCCn
0
o Q
0
ca �
o d
Z �
U �
d
� a
i'l co
� C
0
cb °
G
d 7
oq
C
L[] Y
`v
m �
u U
� m

'u
a�
a
O
L
O
bL
C
O
N
V
d
CC
Cl
0
N
Q �
y
kA U
O �
� Q
O N
Q �
z �-
U
0 00
a �
W �
v �
�C
0
C
U �
� C
W
� U
a�
s U
U
C
3
C
N
N
N
.x
C
dA
C
•�
M
N
(rj
�
C)
M
00
O
O
b
a�
z
Cd
o
OM
4
o
co
o"
0
3
a°-
�°
v
C Cd
cz
u
0
c¢
O
z
v
L�
a
clV_
C
C
>
X
O
•cd
'a
y
.�
L
O
m
0
'%
>,
V)
O
cl
O
n
O
O
y
O
jca
p
0O+
E
•U
v_Q
•E
cd
•ire
E
i�"
Q..
•V.
V
.i:
L+
Q
i�.
• O
cz
„�'
aauu
a.cyo
UU,
aaa¢
CC
U
F;
bA
Q
Cl
0
N
Q �
y
kA U
O �
� Q
O N
Q �
z �-
U
0 00
a �
W �
v �
�C
0
C
U �
� C
W
� U
a�
s U
U

O
O
N
N
Q �
o
� Q
O N
z�
U �
O' O�
a
wth
U
0
bq
_
oq
W �
� U
m cl
U
U b4
N
v,,
0
U
(v`)
�p
O�
N
N
O�
M N
N M
N
M
sa /40
�a a��
4i
N
N
N
00
M
00
kn
M
00
O\ M
00
M
N
C,
M
kn
N N
Nit
Y�o�L
h�J
O
O
N
M
0
0
t
M
N vn
O
O
N O
a�
�•
�-..
yL.'.
oo
C)
UV
�
A
N
O
O
m
U +O'
O
O~
N
3
M
3
a
.0
U
x
,x o
a�
o
Q
U
o
-6
U
ca
O
0,
s-
U a
O O
3
E
Cd
3
°
d
°
z
y
•�
•L
do
Vl
sal; a
U
V
V)
co
c
n
A
L
O
U
cd
•�
`n
En
Y
Q
d
�
�'
k
>
�
>
j
¢=10uuu
aaa�»
ti
U
�
°'
U
E;
F
O
�
O
O
N
N
Q �
o
� Q
O N
z�
U �
O' O�
a
wth
U
0
bq
_
oq
W �
� U
m cl
U
U b4
N

Table C.4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
Big Cedar Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D06054 -D
�Q
1
Sao
F
4�
Go
�o
p
Jo
92532 -01- 0001- year:2
0
24
92532 -01- 0002- year:2
0
24
92532 -01- 0003- year:2
0
23
92532 -01- 0004- year:2
0
17
92532 -01- 0005- year:2
3
16
3
92532 -01- 0006- year:2
1
20
1
92532 -01- 0007- year:2
5
18
3
2
92532 -01- 0008- year:2
3
19
3
92532 -01- 0009- year:2
1
26
1
92532 -01- 0010- year:2
2
22
2
92532 -01- 0011- year:2
2
18
2
92532 -01- 0012- year:2
1
20
1
92532 -01- 0013- year:2
1
19
1
92532 -01- 0014- year:2
2
16
2
92532 -01- 0015- year:2
8
7
8
92532 -01- 0016- year:2
1
18
1
92532 -01- 0017- year:2
0
22
92532 -01- 0018- year:2
5
14
5
92532 -01- 0019- year:2
2
17
2
92532 -01- 0020- year:2
3
13
1
2
92532-01-002 1 -year: 2
2
19
2
92532 -01- 0022- year:2
1
17
1
92532 -01- 0023- year:2
3
18
1
2
TOT: 23
46
427
8
38
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
N

W
0
0
A
O
z
b �
� a
o +'
� o
� d
b �
C; U
U 'ti
a
U
C�
H
z
r
Z £200 I
2200, S26 ,10
V)
t j20o, S26 ,10 zol
O200 S26 '10
Io Z£ ! cl M N N N N V
r-I
6jo0, S26�o
2 Io Z
T £ ! M N N O M
r
6 jtl -
Io7
�j00, £S26�o
, S26�o
jo
Sj00, S26 ,10
j07£
bj00, *10
00 £joo I £S26 ,ioj
t.
tjop, S26�o
Z t T
Ijop, S26�o
Oj00, S26,?o
to, -
'60,
I r'- N N n
pp, S26�o
2��ar toZ l N M N Q\ N
£
8pop` S26�o
t��ar Io Z£ j v1 N •--' �p N d' .-. .-� ,� N
Copp` S26lo
Ip Z£
\000' S26�O
Cc
M
.°
a3
>
cc
O
:?
Z ��a1 jO Z£
S0, S26�o
U
y
•0
b
cOC
U
OC'j
C
C
t-
~
0
2��ar Ip7 j
ro
U
b
£
app p, st6�O
k
d
It
M
0
o
v
¢
ai
m
is
v
r,
u
o
v
w
y
a
a
z
a
5�
a
a
5
a�
>>
19't >
0,
£
S
tpoo26
M
D1
N
N
N
,jo
'to,
£ !
Io S26,?o'
p p Io
Z
£S26lo
kn
M
I-
'
sjv
a,kA§111&
N
S
swaysh
Na
M
N
M
t
00
00
ON
r-
r--
M
V)
"t
-�
wo�
M
O
Vl
M
t-
01
V)
Vl
kn
'IT
00
N
a�
o
o
�
>
d
o
U
o
c0i
cd
u
Q
°
°a
3
.�
o
o
Al
I
Cl
0
N
Q
�o Ca
O N
Ll CO
z�
U '
N
a a=
w to
ti
o
an 2
c
w
�U
-o
� m
Cc
M
.°
a3
>
cc
O
:?
U
y
•0
b
cOC
U
OC'j
C
C
t-
~
ro
U
b
0
o
v
¢
ai
m
is
v
v
u
o
v
w
y
a
a
z
a
5�
a
a
5
a�
>>
Cl
0
N
Q
�o Ca
O N
Ll CO
z�
U '
N
a a=
w to
ti
o
an 2
c
w
�U
-o
� m

O_
O
F
O
0
QN
z�
U �
U �
o n.
a �
w
C
U 0
C
„ O
G
U �
� u
Y U
m �
U
U
Q�
N
�y
w
O
C
G
O
U
C
O
C
o
U
N
�
N
�
y
�
7
>
�
00
t0
U
0
C
d
c
f0
a
0
m
c
a
c
c
eo
c
cn
m
m
A
r°�u
•o
c
•o
v
�
_
'r
•o
�7
U
c
A
c
c
•O
c
U
A
c
R
e
>
A
o
3
A
c
o
o
0
A
�
A
i�
v
..
=
v
A
y
.
is
v
tto
E�
,o
tc
>
>
>
°
>
>
on
X
>
w
^y
w
,n
w
w
>
r
w
O
c
o
o
c
o
0
0
0
N
C
A
C
b
r
Y
X
Y
x
Y
X
Y
O
O
O
O
�
C
X
X
X
Y
C
C
.L
X
C
X
X
C
X
C
C
o
O
O
z
C
O^
U
U
U
U
�a
�
ikaarxa
N
N
U
Y
�aaa
L
N
Vii%
o�a:ci
ci
•a
ywaaaa
N
v;
o
0
o
0
o
m
c
0
0
U;
o
vi
o
0
0
L
y
v
+
v
+
�n
+
o
+
o
+w
m
'o
+�
m
oo
+
+
+
+
+
l�
++�
N
�o
+
+
+
+�+
+
m
�n
W
w
+
o
++
0
0
+
d
M
N
V
N
v�
N
�O
1�
y
D\
y
V
00
O
M
y
v
N
o
N
0
O,
0
m
0
m
0
O
7
0
7
0
0
N
0
�/1
0
�O
0
Vl
0
N
0
M
0
O
o
O�
n
M
0
7
0
h
0
O
Cl
N
0
O
C
+
+
+
+
+
+
d':,
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
M
N
V
N
7
N
�/1
N
lO
N
a,
N
N
M
V
M
w
M
O
V
.+-�
7
N
w^
vt
Vl
r-
l�
W
O
OD
M
a,
D\
M
1�
O
v
a
y
C
•�
U
.�
L
F
.?
a
a°
O_
O
F
O
0
QN
z�
U �
U �
o n.
a �
w
C
U 0
C
„ O
G
U �
� u
Y U
m �
U
U
Q�

zr
o a
a �
• O
.C. G
<<O
C G
d �
c �C
G
[L1 �
x V
m �
U
m
a
a
o;
n.
0.
0.
>
>
�p
y
F
�
U
O
V
O
U
O
•�
U
O
U
-
A
O
•L
o
0
0
'�
-'
v
R
O
�
s
o
0
0
0
•0
0
c
�
0
0
o
•�
v
°
k
o
.�
...
.=
o
A
g
y
o
A
a
Q
n
y
A
O
O
O
m
O
w
O
O
o
o
>
O
O
F
N
p
C
i0
Y
A
F
3
O
pp
C
p
y
3
o
Q
N
N
o
U
y
o
td
o
N
v
N
o
G
x
p
°
2
N
U
c
3
O
o
O
o
o
7
o
o
p
O
p
°
°
w
8
°
v'
r
ti
L
�°
c_
°°'
o
7
7
00
to
CO
U
to
a
y
t
?
o
3
o
ti
w
tr
30
A
A
OO
m
u
o
C 03
F
C
O
F
N
>
>
>>
>
F
•>
R
p
O
�n F
W �.
W
R C
y C
c0
OD
p
o
p
V
p
O
p
O
p
ao
'o
O O
y
U
P.
P.
d
O ,0
C
F
o
G
O
0
0
..
x
x
x
o f
r
°
v ;�
° 3
C
o
G
Gr 3
v
C
H
a
°
o
..UW..
o
O
u
°
o
u
. °
't �,
a>
>
'o
a�
c°
�'
a�
>
o
p
o
vS
p
2i
p
3S
p
W
°°
o
c o°
c g
° o
F
y
`..D
�D
OL
^
Cq
W
L
W
°
W
o ti
O
O �/+
W
O
y
N W
y
'O
tc
°
>
x°
c
>
x
C
x
C
x
C
�'
to .a
CO
^
t, K
'o 'D
O
p
O
O
c
O
c
o
A
O
O
C
C
F
C •0
F 0
0
R N
G
A
v
x
x
w
y
�
y
N
w
y
y
y
N
y
� y
w
N
A
F
W
U
O
ti
W
O
W
O
W
O
O
X G
X
X
�
X
W 'r
W-
tC '�
•X
W '�
'�
m°
x
q
F
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
b
b
b
x
o
x
b
O
W
F
W
x
x
G
W
C
R
G
W
Y
F
W
x
x
x
C
W
X
C
W
C
W
Y
C
W
..�
G
W
O
O
9
O
O
O
O
•p
O
'p
O
O
O
O
O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
b
O
C
W
O
C
W
Q
m
G
W
C
W
m
m
m
C
W
m
G
W
C
W
F
m
m
C
W
m
m
C
W
CO
•T!
m
G
iO
LL
O
O
O
O
F
tO
w
w
o
O
LL
LS.
w
O
a:
LL
C
C
G
O
k.
m
w
m
s
s
.c
a
.L
C
G
.=°
Z
F
o
'y
v
v
G
C
p
C
p°
C
C:
°
v
p
=
y
•"
v
•�
p
v
°
_
Cq
v
R
v
'o
b
tf
K
LLB
CL
_j
.-J
W
W
�
..J
0
..1
0
0.�
..7
.]
0.�
K
o
O
o
•]
•o
o
o
o
o
o
vi
0
0
0
0
0
0
vi
vi
vi
o
�.,
�n
,;�
�'-
o
0
0
�n
�n
v,
o
0
0
0
0
_o
0
0
�n
o
�n
a
O�
+
M
t
t
o0
t
0o
t
Ol
t
°l
+
N
t
+
+
O�
+
oo
t
�O
t
M
+
O
+
1�
t
7
t
�/1
t
N
t
N
+
+
_o
+
M
+
o0
t
0o
+
D\
+
O�
+
t`
+
M
+
r
+
+
'o
t
CL
G.
CL
N
o0
O
L-
lO
N
V
V
IO
oo
O\
O
7
o0
0
D\
of
M
O
M
V
"IT,
y
y
y
O
����
M
M
N
M
M
M
N
N
M
R
7�
J
,,]
]
:n
o0o
n
000cD-
10
oo
n
0
0o0
o
o
o
v
o0
v
0
000U
M
t
-
+
t
lO
+
N
.
dd
to
+
N-
t
t
c
t
h
+
'/�
t
d'
t
�0
t
00
t
�o
+
l�
t
+
h
+
O\
t
N
+
M
+
M
+
-
+
N-
+
+
M
+
N
+
h
+
O\
t
t
_o0
t
Q\
t
+
t
+
t
+
+
+
-
M
7
D\
O
O
M
W
O
O
M
V
V'
vi
oo
O
N
�/1
O
'O
[�
00
O,
O,
O
O
M
M
7
cl
of
G
M
M
M
M
d'
7
7
7
V
N
�o
W
L
y
Y
Y
Gl
w
r�
O
X
o
v
oo
,o
>
o_
zr
o a
a �
• O
.C. G
<<O
C G
d �
c �C
G
[L1 �
x V
m �
U
m

\\
\�
\§
\/
\ ƒ
\\
Zj
)6
/)
j%
2e
2
[
(
)
«
/
)
\
G
-
§
)
(
�
)
r
/
{
/
»
G
)
\
�
§
0
]
®
(
k
\
\
\
=
w
w
�
\
&
\
)aG«)r
))
®a
\z2±22
\\
\
/
+
++
=2\
\
\{(
\
\
\Jƒ
,
q
c
or
�2
AE.!_
\
m
]
))±/
\\
\�
\§
\/
\ ƒ
\\
Zj
)6
/)
j%
2e

u.
IL
0
cu
N
Q)
bA
rocli
0
Pr
1-0
C)
O
O
bA
C13
cc
'n
S
M
V
PC
0
O
Q)
4
O
Q
z
W an
.Ei
O
co
b0 Q
W
u
M
'4 U
U
2 04
WP
"." !
, H4V,
C14
IM,
N
en
W�
C�
r-
00
M
00
�o
C14
CN
clq
s
V1
eq
M
M
N�
00
<D
CN
00
"o
C*
cn
C14
C14
I'D
00
rl-
00
00
0o
O
00
�0
00
In
n
00
O
00
00
00
00
C-4
Cl)
t*-
cn
00
C14
C)
kn
cn
M
C14
rq
C)
00
Zc
r-
00
0
00
00
00
oc
00
C)
rl-
00
00
IF
00
C)
C>
C14
C14
ON
00
C>
I
H
0
C,
Cl
'IT
00
O
Cl
00
cl)
�
r-
cc
00
kn
000 0
\00 C> o
C,
01
00
42
-IZ
tz
F�
sz
C
6
10
cd
u
14)
z
0 "
�J
1-1
zz
zz
Z,
— "I,
I "ZI
cj�
8)
8�
8�
0
cu
N
Q)
bA
rocli
0
Pr
1-0
C)
O
O
bA
C13
cc
'n
S
M
V
PC
0
O
Q)
4
O
Q
z
W an
.Ei
O
co
b0 Q
W
u
M
'4 U
U
2 04
WP

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Veg Plot 1
Veg Plot 2
r
Veg Plot 3
Veg Plot 4
Veg Plot 5
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report— Year 2, December 2010
Veg Plot 6

Veg Plot 7
Veg Plot 8
Veg Plot 9
Veg Plot 11
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
Veg Plot 10
Veg Plot 12
. �
i of l
—Nit
K
Veg Plot 12

Veg Plot 13
Veg Plot 14
Veg Plot 15
Veg Plot 16
Veg Plot 17
Michael Baker Engineering, tic., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
Veg Plot 18

Veg Plot 19
Veg Plot 20
Veg Plot 21
Veg Plot 23
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
Veg Plot 22

t _ _
OR-

�
a
�
F7
TT
-
a
C
-
F:
:0 U
�
w
p
CD
LO
u
O
s

El
�
N
a
y
f
�r
jIt s
a.o
y
x
a
00
�S
`k
. 5
C
}lF'
i
Y,-
y +'
C
�
G
0
Ln
u
q�
q
�) 2
�
u
p
O
�
�
N
a
'
a.o
y
x
a
00
z
(D LL
�+
C
C
N
y +'
�
G
0
Ln
u
q�
q
L D
�
u
p
O
�
U)
O
A
z A
O
zCD
U N
N t-.
O �
w�
wq
ai
} ��a
CC$

Representative Vegetation Problem Area Photos

VPA 1 — Bare bank with damaged matting
VPA 3 — Bare bank with matting
VPA 5 — Invasive species on bank
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
VPA 2 — Bare bank with loss of matting
VPA 4 — Bare bank from overland flow
VPA 6 — UT Bare bank with rocky soils

VPA 7 — UT Bare Bank loss of matting
VPA 9 — UT Bare Floodplain from rocky soils
VPA 11 — UT2 Bare Bank with loss of matting
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
VPA 8 — UT1 Existing & stabilizing wash area
VPA 10 — UT Bare Floodplain from
stormwater flows
VPA 12 — UT2 Lack of bank vegetation due to
poor rocky soils

Appendix D
As -Built Plan Sheets

0
i m 0
o
W N <
� w C)
0
z
w00....uq„.,,
'.0
O L� OI YNIO V=2: •
m
+
t7
9EH L/.
x
U
W
lr
m
S4' +L9
N
V U
ma
00 +�9
£6 +09
V V
m
W '
0_
99+99 -
Il i.
I 29 +9c--
old
I
' a
O
Q
)
VU
Ld
1
w
M
Z
S
V)
U
Q
�
W
U
Z6 +SL
O
\1
s�
d
I 29 +9c--
old
y�
LO
Ln
+
N
u
HOV321 Lin - I
rs
I
0
m
V I
M
O
O
w
I
W
LIJ
O
Q
)
VU
Ld
N
a
w
N ��r
af
,
Z
O
V)
I
�
m
Z6 +SL
O
s�
d
V
U U
N
Q
m W
H
Z
r w
00 +0 L
0
Z
y�
LO
Ln
+
N
u
HOV321 Lin - I
rs
I
0
m
V I
M
O
O
w
W
LIJ
O
Q
)
VU
Ld
w
U W
Z
O
V)
-
�
m
LL,
LL-
O
LJ
V
N
Q
M O
O) O
+ +
N O
I HOV36 Lill
FLOW
:Ld
m
W
J
W W U-_ J J
Q Q N
> > w 0 O
of CL
(n Y d � Q Z C7
O p O Q w d U ¢ O
Z Li Z) J
Y N H N N H O >
U O O U 00 Z Q OJ O
mJ J U.Zi W U
�D
z
Z
w
m
N
Q
H
Z
0
Z
Lj z
O O
P O
O
O
w
Z m
W Z
z
O
N
p
U
n
O
Q Z
�
p
w U
'
O
Z
U
O
Ld
Z
O O,
�'
O
w
U
_j
Q
\ Q
p w
w
O
w
w
OJ
Of
Z
O
N
O Q
p
Z
W
W
Z
O
m
X In
Cl
LJ
Z
0
H
Z
W
m Q J
IZ
Q -
W
Of Z
Z
Z
w
Z Z
w
Z
Z
>
W
2
d'
p
r
H
N
J
d
OU N
N
Fw-
Z
U
3
H H
N N
d
O
H-
N
�
N
�
c
3
OJ
J
O
Y
Z
Z
Q
w X
IY w
X
W
x
W
w
U
O Q
d' ll
X X
W w
x
d
X
W
X
W
O
N
w
M
w
W
U
Q
m
�-
I
N
I
I
I O •.
�
A
0000
000°
W r
I
I
t—
O
U
0000
w
0
i
J

0
w �
m o
o
Ln
o U a Y N$a�
a ( —J CL
v LLJ W W
LLI
uny
w ; �au�r,. J U �_
N ad' off!`, � iy y
as
Woo y`oy�bVt=r? • �
XO�/
do
rv.
F
f a l I I t ( I
W € t
II
W
\ \\ t OOd ff -%
I
W E
3y j W I I
n ( I I t
� W I
I
+
O
F
moon

/
/
/
/
/
- / w
J
4VI
6
/ ;•��lb
O
V.l
SI \
J
W
W /
bOd Z'X
0
W � i
lij
t
W
wzwJ
V<
Y N ° m
w
J
Q
U
N
8
C
8
4
8
s
:I J i Ig
r ry N N N N N N N N

0
cp
o
W
r
M L�
J
Q
U
O N
O
M
� n
!
9f Z (_ X313 Ad
it a Y9 SZ V15 Ad
go
w
1 QO 96 ZCL `, A'313 Ad
LS 69+1, ViS Ad
Rzw \w yC � t
-R f
ILiO£Z r A313 Ad ;
mzww 4 [
1,6 k04 = V1S Ad
-iAi13 Ad o
! F +
�V1$ Ad
e.. bOd ♦_x
ft
U Z, n313
'
. xl �vqy i . . • . . . ! =t Ad � €
Ze-S9 +fZ fl''5 7Ad
Ind A313
fGIKZ = • t
` o
W v t 1
' I !
LO Lo-tz VIS Ad
Y5!Z� =�n313' Nd i
6L9( +zL =! Y1S`Ad j
Og
A
z� ,
i9't£Z = A3131Nd E
,flu +ZL = Y15 Ad �
/ ;

5
S
E ' !
M Pj \N W
� F
wfj
w e m
n• Nor I ' w
nn II k
Sl�llrJ '
IW
00d 9 -x
' W `
\ W
1 w
r t
\ I
W
- � n
"W
Lu
I
a\ I
Sl
b�
� I
OEj-
�<x o
0
0
o �
M LI_
W
J
Q
U
o (n
0
M
m 3 mol o I
r
j T - - A313 Ad f
88 BL +fC VLS Ad
lY 9ZZ A313 Ad
9l Sf +Cf - VLS Ad
i L ' 669ZZ - A113 Ad 1 I
9099 +ZC - VLS Ad
1 lZ SZZ - A313 Ad
lZ f9 +Z£ - VLS Ad'
' Q f1 +ZC VLS IAd
i+
9Z 6ZZ - A313 Ad
66'09 +tC VLS Ad
, I
7 CC'CZZ = A313 IIAd
Y600+tC VLS Ad
' r !
596ZZ = A313 Ad
Y89t +lC - VLS Ad
-tsou A313 Ad
I 1959 +m - VLS Ad
SS'BZZ = A313 Ad
0f'10 +0C - vL5 Ind $
l6'6ZZ - A313 Ind
' 96 OL +6Z - VLS Ad i
6C'OfZ A313 [Ad
Z6 SZ +6Z4 ° VLS Ad !
aaa., a r,g
90 6ZZ - A313 Ad
Ct 6C +9Z - VLS IAd
9L Oft - A313 Ad
CB 6S +84'- VLS Ad I
I I I
WICZ + A313 Ad I $
1Y66 +LZ- VLS Ad
1 � Iry
6C 6ZZ = A313 Ind
i
lL LL +LZ VLS Ad !
i 8S EfZ, r' A313 Nd !
' 8S'tY +CZ VLS lAd
• 1610E ° A'313 Ad I ) g
1696+9Z ° I VLS Ad I ry
I
• WUZ - A313 Ad 1
I
Yf ZV +9Z - VLS Ad
!
! I 1
I i 1 I I °o
ME

tK
air u?
d
mzww
Lj
w
W j
Ll
Lu
WV 0
q--
o
Z;
O-
O
r7 LL
LLJ
-j
0 V)
9 z$+1V - Vls; V,11
96 VZZ AP3 Ndl
h:u,tv v15;
!
A31 , 3 Ad
ZCVZZ A313 N
9tTCTI4 VIS I
I C6 ZZZ � A313
ltz
Lo 4%,LIZE -'hll!
WW(W AJ13y'
69 "+Ot vis
*0 d$,Tl�AIJ4��
61 W A31 Ad
OY;SZZ A313;IAl
IS ZC+D* ViS Ad
WSZZ A313 Ad
Le Zo+ov vis A,
IL113 [A
Z94Z A
90084% - VIS Ad
d
i b9 '
TU A3l; 11
'C6 ZZZ 143
01-09+6C
ai gt+6C VIS
1 1 9' fZZ A313 Adl
i 1� OC+6C ViS: Ad
1-0,
Z
Z
Z
6 A
A
3
7 Z� _ A3,
+6
V
3
I
A
S
go a
31
Ad
Ad
A
d
V S A
' Ad
' S A4
d,
T T "'S: A
d
1 9t, 9ZZ t A313 Ad
91+6c VIS Ad
A
89 M', A313 Ad
+. "IS
d
�A31
V's I,
Ad
LC Lg+QC Ins Ad'
Z9 SZZ 313 [Ad
Vis md,
Bt 2z
A313. Ad
IT Sr+8T ^ VIS Ad
V tZZ - A313 Ad
6U+Qc VIS A
Z 9ZZ A313 Vdi
fl
ViS Ad.
U I ZZ A313 A4
if 61 +9C
ylq Lid
SiltZZ A313 [Ad
99 9S -9C Yi$ Nd, I ttt
Lt tZZ A373 A d
it TO-9c vis ,A
94'IZZ A313 Ad
LT lz+ v « VIS Ad i
I I -
A31311Ad I
Vl$ Lk

U
V)
i m
n
oMn
NN
Ld 00+09 :ViS 3WH31VN
- I w �.' l\ uj
LU
wl
o
ry
AID
Z X0
G�
;; Ps ;n
Ylls Ad ,
Z9 DZZ L A313 Ad
os qjg
te X, 'Wd
L Z, oz -60 YIS' Ad
,
OiZ -i A313 [Ad
S9,9916t I- YIS Ad
6L'i lZ' A;3I; N1,' ft
VIS A'
06IZI-IA31 Ad
9l'OC16f V1SA
zt 07-z =En3i 17 od
.'at t,
4Z4, Ai13 Ad
09 06+9! 1 i Ad
991U A313 Ad
6zoi+97,-, V15 Vdlt
A31� kd'
*4 *J,+0 =j VIS( Ad
U Nd 999Z+9t Ivis Nd
;OZ 6iZ lA3-13 A do
d-
7 1 zt: 96 yis A
UOU -A313 Ad b
11 d
0,
15
*zco+f,* - VIS FInd
90*ZZZ, A313 Ad
if 91+Lt - VI-S rd
I cl Zzz:- iA313!Ad -
C `tj ` it 10+IV VA IAd
q1*Zzz -,A313 I - �;
Ad
u! 99+9# - vis 111%,
49 I;Z,
Zi !, .A3�1? �Wd
'S d
96 6ZZ'-'A313' Add i
lyls iA4 Ek
A313 Ad
69v*9* A"JgdtA
ZI IZZ,-,A3h3: Ad
lowtnn A&
6+4 'i
QVZU - A313,Ad
OZ W +9il - VIS Ad
t
O-Z
I- ► A113 11
99 LO ; d
to d
UZ �li Ad
Eo-"+Gt - vis A4
A313 Ad
sz 96+ts, vis we
19 OZZ - A313 Ad
I A'ln+t'A!13W A fE
co tL »t V1S A
df
LI,lZZ
A313
L. . . . .
SI A d '
llz-cez 1313.
lb O*+$,o - V15 A
t 313 ENd ji
OZZ++i, ViS Ad�
1. TZE - A313
ZG*ZZZ A313 Ad� i
SL'19+1:1 - vis
1 Ad
kq LZ
Z - A313 Ad
f9L tg+rv�--, Yis Adz
A!;fffl-RdAd! %
VIS Ad
69 V.ZZ: A�n3 Ad:
616 CZZ A313 Ad
L�Q+Zl, - Vi
'S Ad
dg.WW It A41%
SPWT44
7A313
+
-�j
1,

0
'o
Z
0 C)
o
n
Z y
HIM.
.....................
e3
MATCHLINE STA: 58+00 — P8
UJ
V111
NNhN
!2
f 1y
of
afill
e,w
A
i � o /�k
0
99 St tgg' • VIS Ad
Z9'G L Z • A313 Ad
L? 4L+gg VIS Ad
LLJ
+
LIJ
0
<
L'i
i
LLJ tLj
j
a--'
—i
<
U
C) LLJ
0
V)
0
LLJ
Fn
cn
So otos vis • A
0
0
m
M
OZ*gZ+tg VA Ad
00, uz Ad,
UZ 44S1 ',As
02 LL - A31 11, d
i y5
99 G Y fe I
56;09-Lg - VIS Ad
9 tj d
it 'vie
S*;CLZ - A313 -Ad i
16 0S ,ig - Yis Ad
00 jtzi A313 Ad
vis 1A
+
tq,*Q - A313 d
'9 9?4-?4Z -- X03 VVOd -1
6L ZtZ - A31a Ad
Zgl+gg-.- VIS Ad
:CC Z LZ -_ A313 Ad
61 7+9g wis A
Ad
49ZI+99 - ViS Ad
, �
99 ZLZ - A313 Ad
9d Z6+99 - VIS Ac
91 i LZ - A313 Ad
Z96L+99 - VIS Ad
Ell 10 11Z A3 . 13 1 Ad
99 St tgg' • VIS Ad
Z9'G L Z • A313 Ad
L? 4L+gg VIS Ad
+
tOgtZ -�A313 Ad
so 49 +*S V15 Ad
CL VIi - A313 Ad I
9Z49+*9 -' VIS IAdM
W W A313 LM
So otos vis • A
BZ'91Z - 'A313 Ad
OZ*gZ+tg VA Ad
-V5'9tZ - A511 Ad
Sl56+CS a V1S Ad
_0 4 v �L z ��Am A
+-
OAR?R3'13 tV4'
1**04+Cgj ViS A
96 91Z = A313 [Ad
IVIS AdN
OtltZ - A3i3 ;Ad
Zt 19 - �IS Ad2
9CL9
, - A313
LIZ Ad -
Ot LC +£G - VIS A -
• OL W A3131 Ad
. • . . . .
61 L t tC9 VIS Ad
. £t LIZ - A313, Ad
1
94'96+Zt - iViS Ad
I N
JA3113 Ad
49 LL+Zg ;VIS A
19 Ill * A313 Ad'
C5 10+49 VIS Ad
-'Ad
. . . . ..
it +Z9 Vl5 Ad�-
cm
L
19 6ZtZG - VIS A
OGSIZ . A313 Ad
0111+19 - '1111111
. . . . . .
ZZ OZ '-'A313 A I . . . . . . .
8
+
66z6+N • Vis I�Ad,-.
9Z'61Z A313 Ad
6298+t9 - ViS Ind., ,
GC'61Z A313 Ad
—1414-19 ViS 'Add i
U W A31� Ad!
'Cl ZV+19 VIS AE
@Z 61Z A313 Ad
69TZ+19 ' "IS Ad,
lit A3" A
9S'01+19 VI5 Ad
A
+
62 *6+0S V1 S A,
MW - A313 Aci
- VIS [A
OCC94+09
C61Z A31J ik&
RA NP 173131S4 Ad'
Adif
A371 d
999C+09 VIS Ad'�
I
of
19 OZZ - A313 A4
1!
6C .—b ti. Nd
I
o
. . . . . IT

MATCHLINE - STA: 58 +00 - P8
w
J
Q
U
N ry n h
11)
166Z +19 V1S Ad � E
` ICZ GIZ.- ,AM3.lA# -
1 W
Gj
31331y r
ono
\
Cf_x
/
r
EE E ll L'LW9 - V15 NdN C i
� W
I
�
69.02, - A113 Ad
Rome 1 :I
f 9Ci60Z - A313 [Ad
co
f ZZ'iC+09 - V15 IA
f E4 Pf:01i A3i3 ;Ad
S9 a +b , - V15 IAdK E ;
n
6D'llZ,- n313 Nd
S9 00F09 - V15
f i
{[ I
%R +00
d9 tlZ - A313 Lid
w
J
Q
U
N ry n h
11)
166Z +19 V1S Ad � E
` ICZ GIZ.- ,AM3.lA# -
i3
E �
7.3'13 V,d
EE E ll L'LW9 - V15 NdN C i
i1�OlZ � A333 N� �
( ZL C9 +09 - V1S Ndlt { i
I
69.02, - A113 Ad
Ad
VLS i
f 9Ci60Z - A313 [Ad
f ZZ'iC+09 - V15 IA
f E4 Pf:01i A3i3 ;Ad
S9 a +b , - V15 IAdK E ;
n
6D'llZ,- n313 Nd
S9 00F09 - V15
f i
{[ I
d9 tlZ - A313 Lid
{
( ZC'{ 64+d9 VIS VJe E I
i
(911L - A313 Ad
90 f9 +6S�- V191Ada I � �
E
[Ad
Ol ZIZ A313 [Ad
0C'ZS +69 - 'ViS IAd
' Lf'Zli 2 A313 4"
i Z6 92+991 V1S Ad I {
09.60Z - A313 N i
4 �E
#6 iot6G
'
E 911ZtZA313 Ad
� ZZ 90+99 -f V1S Ad '
Z6 ili -, A313 Ad
KVS-G9 E j V15 Ad
K
,
997ZLZ A313 Ad
r
I L1 ff +991- V1S Ad � { f
j ( 96'OIZj - A313 N 7
9 ;
9911 +eS V15 Nd E I I
.'Lli

1 \w
I a
I � I
W
0
W S
I
w •� i
I
W A6x
9
W O
I0
IW � i
0
w
I /
I
© X-15 p0OL
W
o �
W
I
W \
I
w
o
I ' �
W /
I
z�
3
m
+ I I
r I
I I
t
/ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
(I\ I I
\ I I I
I
I I $
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
\ o
0 w I I
' xaa I
I
NNE
n 'Al
� I I
I I
I
I
I �
� I
I
� I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
i I i
I I
1 I
I I
� I I
1 I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
an q 3
A
I mzww
3 / 1
/ I
/ I
/ I
/ I
/ I
a
m�e
N � �
0
o
M W
W
J
Q
U
o N
0
M
ii
{
f4 89Z '• A31 Ad E
t!
ff'99Z � A313 Ad
(
l0 OL +L t) = V1S Pd
I �I
'EE �
7
19 69Z = A31J Nd
'
££9f +LI V1S I\d
'
S
I
E '6Z OtZ•= IA'�93 IAd
I
ttE
! I 99 Y6 +91 1 ivis NL
!
i
*6'992 = A313 [Ad
V15'Nd {
€
j
if'OLZ " A313 Ad
< ' 1 Ci 11 +91 = V1S tAd
I � '
t I
{
E
i E I
j I+ 1L4 A313 Nd
094+9l V15 Ad ,
i
1
'98 L4 +41 = V,IS�Nid i
i
E Mut • ATO Ad
'
€
ZS CZ +St = V1S Ad
I f € I
€
I
f
0f "ZLZ A313 Ad
91 Z9 +)I — V'1S Ad t E
( t
,
� 99'lCZ = n313 tnd
'
.
! I eZ f9 +vI — V15 Nd
€ • .
f
``9l
ZCZ = A313 Ind tf
s
I
06 f£ +91 V16 Ad
�
�4ftZ4Z - n313 ,IAd
�'9L +£4 b V1S Ndr060Z+E(- 1 i
31i �Ad
V1S Ntl
Ad
lS Nd
�
i
i
<9 LLL - n313 Ne
�99S9 +it VS = 1 Ad €
I
` i
f
!
ZZ LLZ - A313 Ind
L40L +Z1 V15; Nd
t
t
Z9 ZLZ * A313 Acd I
OZCt +Zt - V1S Ad I
,
I I €
3
1
j
E
` € B� ZLZ = A313 Nd,
I
' 9'/L +11 = V1S Tl 4
'L
1LL = A31� Nd 1
!1$(19 +IL — V151LA5
I
i I 195'ZGZ = n313 IAd� •
>
LV -90 +EL o- V1S,Vd
E
t
Z9 Ue - A313 Ad
`
6Z I£ + II - V1S Ntl
j 1
09 ZLZ = h313 Nd €
'
> IF Z } +IL = VisilAd 7
€
i
j! f& 1LZ = Ai13 Ad
g
1 Ijt
I
if
, eo'£LZ - n313 me
(
' es ea +ol = vls Ud�
60 ZLZ A313 Ad
9L L£ +01 r V1S N C� QLL = A313 Ad, ;
L9.9Z +O1 = V1S Ind

Q�,N /
/
x00
Cpl /
0
/ k
W
1
�\ -19 R/F
W
W 1
W rtq��
CL
W � �
� E
\
\
\
\
\ \G N \
\
E
I ��P
W
SAP
I -
W
W r�
I
W
Ia
I
W .
I
W
I I !
W
\ / o
pO
1, (App ®�
�A
v%
\ 1
\
\
E \\ \
\
\ 1
_ , 1
E \ \
\ 4x \1 1 1\
1 1
1 1
/ a
I I
I I
� I I
I I I
I 1 I
� I I
I I
� I
I I
e I I
I I
I I
� I
� } 1
� � I
I I
I
I
I /
I /
/ I
x_0 POOL
/ I /
/
I I l
Q /
I
I /
00
O
10
j _
j t i i I F i
€
*t'4 9i = A313 Ad
_• -�- j ---- '
F
CL
jjM L9 ±6L V1S Ad'
l 1 j
d
Q
W
Q
Of
Q
I 3 { ! L9 99L A311 Ad
N
Q
W Lw
U �
f—
o
J
< O
CCU
F
O
N
m
W
-
1
\
O
M
2
1
E
I ��P
W
SAP
I -
W
W r�
I
W
Ia
I
W .
I
W
I I !
W
\ / o
pO
1, (App ®�
�A
v%
\ 1
\
\
E \\ \
\
\ 1
_ , 1
E \ \
\ 4x \1 1 1\
1 1
1 1
/ a
I I
I I
� I I
I I I
I 1 I
� I I
I I
� I
I I
e I I
I I
I I
� I
� } 1
� � I
I I
I
I
I /
I /
/ I
x_0 POOL
/ I /
/
I I l
Q /
I
I /
00
O
10
j _
j t i i I F i
€
*t'4 9i = A313 Ad
_• -�- j ---- '
F
CL
jjM L9 ±6L V1S Ad'
l 1 j
d
Q
W
Q
Of
Q
I 3 { ! L9 99L A311 Ad
N
Q
W Lw
U �
f—
o
J
< O
CCU
F
O
N
m
W
FY
O
� o m
O
M
2
L'6S = A313 Nd
~ I
61'99Z 1= 1 13 IAd i
SS 69+19Z �VlS Ad
i i
! ! tt'6SZ - A313livw
' 1 Z9'69 +SZ - 1V15
i I L9SSZ - A313 A i
- .L64vtSZ a. T15 Ad ,
i ? )919L = A313 V4 f f
Ss ft +SZ •, V1S lAd €
f{ � Ef 1
t 1 € IS'19Z - A313 Ad j E
j OL 6Z+SZ V1S Ad , f
i PV09Z A3I3ilAd
i € 1 '91 +SZ' 3 V1S Ad ,
A949Z - -A313
Z6 96 +tL = V1$ Ad,
I i i
I , i 96 Z9Z - A313 IAd
09 BZ +tZ � V15 Nd {
t
� C E
46 194 = A373 (Ad E
j € Ot Ol +tz = v1S Ad €
98 Z9Z A313' Ad i
i
f i ZL69 +fZ VI S Ad I ;
i E , 91 Y9L f; A313 -AdA ( E E I
ti LO`Ktq V1S IAd {
i IS f9Z A313 Ad E
fL 9L +ZL = 1 vlSlAd
�€
E 1
I
�Z6 Y9Z A313 Ad
i 90 Ot +ZZ +' V1S Ad 1
( i I
E }
1 69592 % A313 Ad ' !
L916 +LL v15 Nd I �
� ! E
` 91,99Z A313 Ad
j
E [ € i 1 10 PL +LL V1S Ad! 1
i 9S 99L1 d A313 Ad !
39L,60 +L`Z VlS Ad
I i
j c
1 i Le �9i = A313 (Ad
I
9t t6 +OZ r• V1S Ad
iii Ef E �,
I� >,
tt 9 A 1
>__ 1
92 * 313 Ad �
j 19'S +OZ = V1S d . I
j _
j t i i I F i
€
*t'4 9i = A313 Ad
_• -�- j ---- '
{ , CL199Z = A313 Ad i
jjM L9 ±6L V1S Ad'
l 1 j
` I
i
BC +6l
j j j E
1 86 i= v15 Nd
I 3 { ! L9 99L A311 Ad
I f BSiSQ +BL L V15 V,d I
i
i 6t "L9L = A313 IAd i
Lt 19 +91, Vls Ad
EI jE{`( I jt
I I
' 1 I i 'Yl'B9Z =IA313 Ad
iI #Z-)t +91 v16 Ad I
� j I
s
s
8
3
8
8
+
J.i

0
w
2 Z m O
x
Lo
0.
O a a O ?�
z
zZ .................
O O 4 �!�� j =� •
\nuu "100
y 6` 101d0� • b
a
W ' /
I I /
i
`l z2 /
a /
I / /
1
I / /
W / /
I I
+ I I
I I
I ' I
I iii �mYl I
a I
i $Ne>I
_�I I
z
I \ 1 1
1 1
I 1 1
�1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1
Lo
1 �
W •\ �, a' � \v I 11 11
I I +
� N
I I /
I• y X -Zi R1�
WI
5/
0
jEI
I
'
II
,
09$4+
f r
;
.6z
{ i
1 ! i
[,l Ol
E
f
A313 Ad•
i
'
i
I E
09.99 +1£
0
o U- C) Y
Lj W
J U NW
1..L
O FO
U
0
r1
Z
Q
_ J
'F—
V /
- � a
6i6f'Z - A313 Ad g
Y0+90 = ViS (Ad <_ +
j 6Z 4SZ - A313 Ad,
! 18'68 +££ YLS Ad
�C� I
!
Z� -I A313 Ad
££ ViS Ad t !
l9Z ;- n313 Ad !
+j££j - V1S Ad ! 1
i
€I€
09T
£590 +0£' =l Y19 Ad
I !
9L £9Z -'A3 V3�
It 69 +0£ Ad
SL'f5Z = n313
f0 t8 +6Z j Vl
r
�f f�
I ,I,
' 1
, f
! I ! 90 c9t » A313 Ad
SO 6f +9Z - ViS Ad
It£ LSt - A313 Ad
• • I BL'Ii +OZ - Yi0 Ad
f � I
i I9699Z a A313 Ad
f£'9£ +LZ - Vi5 Ad
I! S
I
I i f
Ilfi
.LL 61Z = A313 rr t 9Z £St9t + vi5 Nd
I � I
!
' 3 j
i
Z9 ZSZ; - AM Ad
LS 6L ±O£ YiS Ad
i f fl 95Z ; =,A313 Ad
E I ZL 91 +0£ + Y1S Ad I
i i
dl �,
d`
;�f f
Ili Ii,
i
�I
9"921 = A313'Ad
f 90.11 +6Z - V15 Ad
F
L9 99Z - A313 Ind
1920£ +9Z - VLS' Ad
fg
N
i
6 49& A313-Ad . ---- . _•__
i
ILSZ - A313 Ad
iZ +LZ » YiS Ad
£4 L6Z - A313 Ad
l f£ +9L - Y45 l d
N N N N N N N � � N .•. '9N' � � r ,
Ii
Z9 19Z » A313 Ad
VLS Ad
f 3
f
•
1 ! i
!
*L-i9Z
E
f
A313 Ad•
i
'
i
I E
09.99 +1£
I YLS Ad
E
90 £SZ - A313 Ad
! !
ZO 1£ +l£ - YLS Ad
€I€
09T
£590 +0£' =l Y19 Ad
I !
9L £9Z -'A3 V3�
It 69 +0£ Ad
SL'f5Z = n313
f0 t8 +6Z j Vl
r
�f f�
I ,I,
' 1
, f
! I ! 90 c9t » A313 Ad
SO 6f +9Z - ViS Ad
It£ LSt - A313 Ad
• • I BL'Ii +OZ - Yi0 Ad
f � I
i I9699Z a A313 Ad
f£'9£ +LZ - Vi5 Ad
I! S
I
I i f
Ilfi
.LL 61Z = A313 rr t 9Z £St9t + vi5 Nd
I � I
!
' 3 j
i
Z9 ZSZ; - AM Ad
LS 6L ±O£ YiS Ad
i f fl 95Z ; =,A313 Ad
E I ZL 91 +0£ + Y1S Ad I
i i
dl �,
d`
;�f f
Ili Ii,
i
�I
9"921 = A313'Ad
f 90.11 +6Z - V15 Ad
F
L9 99Z - A313 Ind
1920£ +9Z - VLS' Ad
fg
N
i
6 49& A313-Ad . ---- . _•__
i
ILSZ - A313 Ad
iZ +LZ » YiS Ad
£4 L6Z - A313 Ad
l f£ +9L - Y45 l d
N N N N N N N � � N .•. '9N' � � r ,

O� j \ \
n \ \
I 1 1
W r 1 1
1 \
I O 1 \
1 \
t I 1 1
w i I
I
I
W I I
I I I
I I
I I
W '
I I
I 1
I I
I
/ I
°a I
w � I
/ I I
/ I I
� I
w
Ili
I I
7(_23 P001 I I
I I
w.
I I
w ` 9
Icy
00 Vis
o & I I
1 �P�
I I
I
I
3NI Hal bW �
0
(0
ry
oM F:� < Y
W f
J U W
Q �
o N UU
t^1]
0
pp pp� mm
i
Ssooz A313 Ad !
t
00 ZL +ta - V1S Ad I
E _� ES t,6fZ; 11313:
N
d '
i p
• •.. f t i ±V15 IAd OfZ -n3l3i Nii l (
6002 +u - V1S Nd�
E "5
1 I jjI
N' eA 1 IA
SZ W 31 d
i I
Zt'lbZ v A313 Ad i
I E Zf f9rOf - Vl$ NdI
t I � I , I
0 t! -!A 1
9 SZ +O = Y1S
• ( { 9Y'0 A313 Ad I '
E
Ot SL +Ot) - V15 NdI 1
OS ZYZ A313 Ad g
I ' i ZS 66 +6t `- V1S Ad g
j I
A313 lnd,
L"i +ar' °, ViS Ina
I
313
I
k 6S f1Z � A Ad
I I
I t I I I I
I 96EZ ±6L Vj5 Ad
abZ - A313 Ad o
+
9Z'10 +6f n Y1S �,d n
I Zf SYZ A313 Ad t
I 19 PS +9L• V1S I ± II
V1S Nd
00 OZ ATO �Ad
i
LbY6 +9f = V15E Ad
I' s
�c
i sti2- �n3+9 Na• -•_-. +
E E
j l i i 0LTi6 +Lt i' Y1S I
( `E
E
Ci'LYZ - A333 Ad
> ZC 09-LC yl$ Ad,
L6 9C+'Lf' -I V1S Ad
F a
I ,
i
i I09 t+ A3'13' - Y Na E
SS LvZ - A313 Nd g
9S l0 +Lf' -; Nd'_•_
(t Baz - A313 Ina I '
�6L'6+9f - V1S Ad '(
ZO -LYZ - A313 Nd
C6 SZ +9C' - V1S Ad
OZ E
,
49 L1Z - A313 Ad E
;96'IB +SS - Y15 Ad ' t
(�
I I 99 -Ltz 1- A313 Ad
60 SS +$f - 415 Ad
[ Jf 9fL T A313 Ad
f4 lti +S£(- V15 Nd {
} E
I 56 M - A313 JIIA,i
jf i Li'Z I +Sf - V1S Nd'
, i I I i E i I rvi
t { t
6L %0 1 AYid Nd $Z � -, i I
E a SLtf9 V16 Ad
f
t t
E Zf lS + A313 AdI
j €
19'00+k - V15 Ad '
E
i
,16,6YZ L A313 Ad g
LO VOV -9 -

x
z z m o
0
w U a Y \"
U
Z
...............
O O � �i�Q %r` •
W N !z
o
W <OXO l
/ \ J
c
Cy3�� I I
1 NN7I I
c / I
� I I
X,y o I
yf� \b I I
I I
_ I I
Q I
I
I
oE; ;tee
YI I
I
n I I
I I
i I
i I I
I
1 � I
I I I
I 1
W III
a I I
\ I
� I
/ I
I
1
1
w I
w � '
w
P 2
/OO /
O
fD
Ip G:� z
o p Q Y Q
W LJ w
J U D W
W
O
a p r7
ry r ti ♦ h _. N
3
3
R
3
i
n313 Nd
i ! 40'ZfZ d
't6'94 +6Y'
" V3S NN
I i 99 ore = A313 ItAd
'E
t Ot'f5 +6t Y15�d
! i N
I i
t61QZ =IA313
Sf 11 +6t
EEEE i
N.d
,Y1S Nd
I
f , 99 t£Z - A313 Nd
E ! 9E 6 +9t'- V1S [Ad
'
SI'ZtZ =
' ! I Z90+90 -�
LC NZ - n313 Ad
A313 (Ad
V1S Ad
I j 09 614 90 V15 Ad
3
i ,WKZ = A3131
1
Ad!
I ! I!
� t9'zrz = n313 Ne
' ( i t6 OZ +Lt - VA IAd'
� 1
'
! ! E9£tcz - ;A313
."d
0106 +9t - vl'S
Nd
99 gfzz ; n313 IAd• II E
9e-46191 - ns Nn
j
A313 v!d
9L'O1 +0 YAS
J i
:Nd
4i 9£Z -; A313 Lid
19 N St VLS Ad
�ii ij (
t .I
I
1
f !
9C LTZ'- A313 Nd
€ (' ST LZ +GY Yl$ Nd
`
E
3
96 +t� i ;YFS 3Ad
E
6t LCZ A3V M
. 40t9 +tt,= viava:
Y
(�I
009fZ: A31 Nd' E
6622 +tr Vj5 Nd E E
i
! " I
i ! .
99 We j- n313' Nd
i
j I L6'f6 {t9 - V15 end
E
E
E
lt'85Z - 3�3 Nd I
9t f9 +tv } n'1$ Nd
} t
' 1 90'6£Z - A313 Nd
91'C L +Ct -; V1S Ad
I
' lE SC'LCZ N313 `Ad '
l i SC'19 +Zt = VI Ad I E
! j � IEi �
i
r ! ' 96 9£Z; - A313 Nd
'
i
} � ye 6s +zt + 'Yis end
� €
I
j
3
3
R
3
i

$kp0 .
I �m d\
� A ,
w 3 I
/ `OR� w
� I
/ 8 / w
Lo
"C
W W
I
w
NNI I ail I p W
b A /
W / /
I / /
W l I
/
I \ I
W I I
w � y'• ��� I � I
StY (I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
gl I
z' `y I
W � , I I
I I
I I
1 I
W I o III I III
1, I
} }} I I
Wzu
II � II
1
I
0
Lo
ry
o < Y
w UW F
w
Q r
C) N UU
CD
0
M
N N N
I I i i p
S1W -i A313 Vld 1
E 09'99 +LS' - V1S Ad
fill � A3A Ad ( E
i i 4 L d ( f
I�
,E 1
I 1 S
OZZ - 1 A
E U + A3y3 Nd
Zl {9t +96 V1S IA
!!d ( Ol +9S Vl`S IA
}LL a A313 1Ad t
1106* +4S - V1S Ad I I
! I j 9f'fii A313Nd
I 1 i L9'SC+SS = YIS Ad
CS 1ZZ - A313 kd I i
�94'OZ +49- V1S, Ad j
i 1
E f f ' 6C SZZ - A313 Ad '
f I Yl O9 +�S - V1S LAdj '
' !9LYLZ - A313 [Ad I
zo B9 +15 VLS [Ad
-6ZZ x A113 kAd 1 E
111 (ZS K +4S - V15 Id
(
19 yZL < ATO Ad
' .fy'ZQ +W. d15 Ad i • � 1 g
i � E
i E u 1ZZ - ATO Nd
I E �% L( +CS - Yl$ Ad,
1 1 1 9CWj -IA 313 Ad E
Y9'C9 +CS Y1S lAd I E
f
E i !
100 9LZ I- A313 Ad , 8
91 4O- CS - V15 tAd +
99 922 l! A313 IAd E E
96 09 +ZS f - VLS IAd '
('
E
1 et az b n313 Ad
co es +zS - VjS
I
• I 999ZL • 313 Ad•
K 90119 [Ad
( Si LZZ - A313 Ad 1 1 ! f
' ' I SYI99 +iS Vj5 Ad
11 iIj
i I '
€ x,16 OCZ - A313
' 169 CB +OS - IV1S lAd
I1 I 1
I I l['6ZZ � A313 Ad 1
6! 09 +OSs -� YLS Ad j I
WON - A313 Ad
' 7,9C +09 V1S�IAtl
' f

0-
L9 60Z A313 LAd"
0
F—
Wale A313 �Ad
W
96012 'A313 LAId
60 Og+vq vis lmd?
1 9L LIZ - A . 313 lAdl
C)
0
:LZ Z IZ - A313: IAtl I
O
el 60 +C9 - VIS lAd! 8
.
• . . .
OL Lle - A313 . . . . .
fhb
llj
aso i � me � 1 �� '
"z, I
uj
00
Vh
L9 60Z A313 LAd"
91 99 +£9 - VILS LAIL
Wale A313 �Ad
to 6g+,B.., visItA'O
96012 'A313 LAId
60 Og+vq vis lmd?
1 9L LIZ - A . 313 lAdl
:LZ Z IZ - A313: IAtl I
el 60 +C9 - VIS lAd! 8
.
• . . .
OL Lle - A313 . . . . .
MORZ9, Aj-MIW&d
to 69+zg Vis LAe
BL M - A313 LU
OL 9L+z9 - YIS! L4
C C, C V - 6313 L&d
L wg-M311a$!Ai Id
LZ as +Z9 - Vis,
616 r3Z A�I�l Vd
--r-Z. - "s jtA4 i Z Liz A313 itAd
O-zc+zg vir I.ie
X6Z
Z Od
-,GC�TIZ - A313 IU
CL 91+Z9 - VLS IAd
. .
KIM A313 kAj
. . . . . . 14 tO+Zg = VIS' Ina
6 10 CIZ A113 Ad
49-99+0 - V{S }\4
09:M . A313 iAJ
zz CZ+Lq - VIS 4�d 64T14 A313 Ind;
99+19 VIS LAd,
96ZIZ A313; Ad
U c IZ A313 Nd
!ZI,6C+19 = YLS, Nd
deg 14 A313 Od
96+4 +9S VIS Ad

Appendix E
Photo ID Log
1. Big Cedar Creek (BCC)
2. Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT 1)
3. Unnamed Tributary 2 (UT2)
4. Crest Gauge Photos

APPENDIX E:
PHOTO ID LOG

Big Cedar Creek Photos

BCC PID I— Cross Vane, BCC
Reach 6 End
BCC PID 2 — Re- graded Riffle, BCC Reach 6
BCC PID 3 — Existing Riffle, BCC Reach 6
BCC PID 4 — Re- graded Riffle, BCC Reach 6
BCC PID 5 — Re- graded Riffle, BCC Reach 6
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 6 — Log Vane in distance, BCC
Reach 6 Start

BCC PID 7 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 4 End
BCC PID 8 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 4
BCC PID 9 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 4
BCC PID 10 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 4 Start
BCC PID 11 — Log J -Hook & Constructed Riffle,
BCC Reach 3 End
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 12 — Log J -Hook Step Pool,
BCC Reach 3

BCC PID 13 — Log J -Hook &
Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 14 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 15 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 16 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 17 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 3
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 18 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3

BCC PID 19 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 20 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 21 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 22 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 3
BCC PID 23 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 3 Start
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 24 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 2 End

BCC PID 25 — Riffle Crossing, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 26 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 27 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 28 — Log J -Hook & Constructed Riffle,
BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 29 — Log J -Hook & Constructed Riffle,
BCC Reach 2
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 30 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2

BCC PID 31 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 32 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 33 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 34 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 35 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 36 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2

BCC PID 37 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 38 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 2
BCC PID 39 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 2 Start
BCC PID 40 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 1 End
BCC PID 41 — Constructed Riffle, BCC Reach 1
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC PID 42 — Constructed Riffle, BCC
Reach 1 Start

UT1 Photos

UTI PID 1 —Constructed Riffle, UTI
Reach 4 End
UTI PID 2 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 4
UTI PID 3 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 4
UTI PID 4 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 4
UTI PID 5 — Riffle Crossing, UT 1 Reach 4
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
UTI PID 6 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 4

UT PID 7 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 4
UT1 PID 8 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 4
UT PID 9 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 4
UT1 PID 10 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 4
UT 1 PID 11 —Constructed Riffle, UT 1
Reach 4 Start
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
UT PID 12 — Constructed Riffle, UT
Reach 3 End

UT 1 PID 13 — Constructed Riffle, UT 1 Reach 3
UT PID 14 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT PID 15 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT PID 16 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT1 PID 17 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 3
UT PID 18 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010

UT1 PID 19 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 3
UT PID 20 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT PID 21 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT PID 22 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT1 PID 23 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 3
UT PID 24 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010

UT 1 PID 25 — Constructed Riffle, UT 1 Reach 3
UT PID 26 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
UT 1 PID 27 — Constructed Riffle, UT 1 Reach 3
UT PID 28 — Log sill step pools (3), UT
Reach 3
UT PID 29 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 3
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
UT1 PID 30— Constructed Riffle, UT1
Reach 3 Start

UTI PID 31— Constructed Riffle, UT1
Reach 2 End
UTI PID 32 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 2
UTI PID 33 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 2
UTI PID 34— Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 2
UTI PID 35 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 2
UTI PID 36 — Constructed Riffle, UTI Reach 2
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010

UT1 PID 37 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 2
UT1 PID 38 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 2
UT PID 39 — Rock and roll structures (3), UT
Reach 3
UT PID 40 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 2
UT1 PID 41 — Riffle crossing, UT1
Reach 2 Start
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
UT PID 42 —Constructed Riffle, UT
Reach 1 End

,r
UT1 PID 43 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 1 UT PID 44 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 1
UT 1 PID 45 —Constructed Riffle, UT 1 Reach 1 UT 1 PID 46 — Constructed Riffle, UT 1 Reach 1
UT1 PID 47 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 1 UT PID 48 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 1
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010

UT PID 49 — Constructed Riffle, UT Reach 1
UT1 PH) 50 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 1
UT1 PID 51 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 1
UT1 PID 52 — Constructed Riffle, UT1 Reach 1
UT 1 PID 53 — Constructed Riffle, UT 1 Reach 1
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
UT1 PID 54 — Constructed Riffle, UT1
Reach 1 Start

UT2 Photos

UT2 PID 1 — Constructed Riffle, UT2 End
UT2 PID 2 — Constructed Riffle
UT2 PID 3 — Constructed Riffle
UT2 PID 4 — Constructed Riffle
UT2 PID 5 — Constructed Riffle
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
UT2 PID 6 — Constructed Riffle

UT2 PID 7 — Constructed Riffle UT2 PID 8 — Constructed Riffle, UT2 Start
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010

Crest Gauge Photos

UT 1 Crest Gauge — 10/ 10/ 10
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc., EEP Project No. D06054 -D
Big Cedar Creek Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2, December 2010
BCC Crest Gauge — 12/8/10