The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20131224_Report_20120102Iv NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Design Build Process WBS No 17BP 5 R 9 Field Scoping Meeting Date Division 5 Location On -site Route (US /NC /SR) SR1100 County Wake Project Description Bridge #338 over Kenneth Creek on SR 1100 Tier SUBREGIONAL Municipality r(kv� Attendees Structure No 910338 1 of 4 Name Phone No E -mail Division Bridge Manager Division Environmental Officer Hydraulics Engineer Geotechnical USACE DENR -DWQ TPMU TPMU TPMU Bridge Management Structure No 910338 1 of 4 Existing Features Feature Bridged 910338 Bridge #338 over Kenneth Creek on SR 1100 Ex Bridge Clear Deck Width 24 3 (Ft) Existing Shoulders (Ft ) (Bridge / Culvert) Length 41 (Ft) Deck Width (Out To Out) 25 3 Water Depth 1 (Ft) Height Bed To -Crown 12 (Ft) Prior Survey Date Posted SV 16 TTST Superstructure Type ST F -BM , Substructure Type NONE Span Type 1 - 40 5' Historic High Water (Elev To The Existing Structure) (Ft) Sufficiency Rating 322 , DP 55 School Bussing crossings per day Posted Speed Limit In Project Vicinity (mph / Statutory 55mph) Detour Off -Site Stage Construction On -site If Detour is Off -Site Provide Description Of Detour Route Approximate Length Of Detour? 6( Miles ) Improvements Needed To Road(s) On Detour? Div Traffic Eng Recommend Off -site detour signing? Improvements Needed To Bridges On Detour? Are Bridges On Detour Currently Programmed On Tip? Are There EMS Or Business Access Issues? No Are There Any Railroad Crossings On Detour? Should Work Zone Pedestrian Access Be Maintained During Construction? Overhead Utility Lines In Conflict Power Transmission Lines In Conflict Telephone In Conflict Cable Lines In Conflict Fiber Optic In Conflict Water In Conflict Sewer In Conflict Natural Gas In Conflict Other In Conflict (Ft ) 20 Based On The Past History Near This Project Site What Is The Estimated Time Required To Complete Utility Adjustments — Months Is There Any Future Utility Construction Anticipated In The Project Area Is A FEMA Buy -Out Property Being Impacted Structure No 910338 2 of I Environmental Wetlands At Site No Comments But impacts to JD stream is likely Known Endangered Species Populations In Area? Yes Michaux's sumac, Red cockaded woodpecker & Dwarf wedgemussel Comments Biological Conclusion for MS & RCW were NO EFFECT DWM to be determined Trout County N TVA County N CAMA County N Primary Nursery Area N I Moratoria If Yes - Duration . I Permits Required C� Water Quality Classification C, Buffer No Will A Coast Guard Permit Be Required? No Drainage Basin Cape Fear Is The Project Site In Or Near Any Of The Following National Forest No, Wildlife Refuge No, State County Or Local Park No, Wild And Scenic River No, Airport No, A Lake For Recreation Of Power Generation Water Supply Reservoir No, Nutrient Sensitive Waters N , Public Use Boat Ramp Cemeteries Known Or Potential Historic Properties in The Area Historic Archit Survey required N , Archaeology Survey required S Is The Bridge Structure Itself Or Any Part Thereof Considered Historic No Will The Project Impact A Church Community Center Or Other Public Facility? Is This Project On A Statewide Bicycle Route Or A Local Non - Marked Bicycle Route N Any Clarification Or Comments On Items Above Geotechnical Are There Any Historical And / Or Vibration Sensitive Structures Near By Comments Are There Any Known Landfills And / Or Geo- environmental Hazard Sites At Or Within Close Proximity To The Project Site -- - - - - -- Comments Are Any Impacts Anticipated To Natural Springs Or Artesian Wells Comments Possible Foundation Type Structure No 910338 3 of 4 a Hydraulics Will This Project Require FEMA Approval? Y (MOA ) Will This Project Require A State Stormwater Permit? N Is There Unusual Scour Potential? Is Protection Needed? Are Banks Stable? Is Protection Needed? Does Stream Carry Appreciable Amount Of Large Debris? Will The Placement Of Bents In The Water Be Allowed Drop Inlets Flumes or Funnels? Items To Be Discussed / Resolved At FSM By Attendees Off Site Detour ❑ Stage ❑ New Location ❑ Type Of Environmental Document Low Impact Data Spreadsheet ❑ Minimum Criteria Rule /MC Checklist ❑ Other Superstructure Type (office estimate Bridge 80 triple 10 x8 RCBC which would require CLOMR) Number Of Spans Length Of Spans ADT 2300 /BIR NHS 0 Tier SUBREGIONAL Func Class LOCAL Bridge Min Clear Deck width Recommended by Div Roadway lane width 'with ` shoulders Will Railroad Involvement Be Required R/W by Others DBT will be responsible for R/W acquisition and coordination of utility issues Permits NCDOT will submit permits as prepared by DB Team Method of Clearing Truck Percentage _ % Reasonable Safe Speed mph Liquidated damages will be imposed after days of closure Amt $ per day CEI to be done by NCDOT or others Salvageable materials Removal of remnant abutments /piers Additional Comments Any priority in bridge construction sequencing? Approach slab on skew or perpendicular? Structure No 910338 4 of