20201259 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20210215

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201259
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Central Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
401 Assemblage - Utility Route
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Lauren Norris -Heflin
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/15/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Swift Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-III; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.673782
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201259
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
1/13/2021
Longitude:
-78.671471
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
2021.02.13_DWR Pre -Filing - no meeting req.pdf
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
A. Processing Information
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Rick Trone:eads\rvtrone
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
2
92.38KB
52.18K6
County (or Counties) where the project is located:

Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
P Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 12 - Utility Lines
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Ild. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
Ile. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
W Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Multiple Owners, City of Raleigh ROW
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
1 Exchange Plaza
Address tine 2
Suite 620
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
PST Development, LLC
3b. Business Name:
3c.Address
Street Address
168 Business Park Drive
Address tine 2
Suite 200
City
Virginia Beach
Postal / Zip Code
23462
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Lauren Norris -Heflin
4b. Business Name:
Timmons Group
4c.Address
Street Address
5410 Trinity Road
Address tine 2
Suite 102
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
06_401 property owner certification. pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
('rf appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality I town
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / I3gion
VA
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
15.63MB

Garner
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0699582214,0699583961,0699892857,
0790805542, 0790805662, 0790806712,
2b. Property size:
0790806851,0790806990,0790807968
5.57
2c. Project Address
Street Address
West of St Mellion St
Address tine 2
Dty
State / Ffovince / Region
Garner
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27603
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Swift Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-III; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located
030202011002
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site is an off -site utility line associated with a planned residential development submitted under a previous permit application. The 401 permit and Buffer Authorization
(20201259 Ver 1) have been received for the main site, and the 404 permit is in progress (SAW-2020-01270).
The proposed off -site utility route was determined to be necessary after the main site permit application had been submitted. The proposed utility route will be located within an existing
20-ft wide City of Raleigh Utility ROW. Impacts for installation of the new line will be limited to this 20-ff wide corridor. The utility ROW is currently occupied by a maintained herbaceous
area and a portion of a golf course. A delineation was completed for a larger 5.57-acre area surrounding the utility route.
For the purposes of this application, only the utility route will be discussed as all other impacts are addressed in the original application.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
The 401 permit and Buffer Authorization (20201259 Ver 1) have been received for the main site, and the 404 permit is in progress (SAW-2020-01270).
Project History Upload
401 Assemblage_DWR 401 Permit (20201259 Ver 1).pdf
401 Assemblage DWR Buffer Authorization (20201259 Ver 1).pdf
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form.pdf
761.46KB
720.8KB
174.21 KB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 1 - VIC.pdf 1.85MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 5 - NRCS.pdf 856.45KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.85
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
596
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace in existing sewer line to enable the required capacity for the addition of a single-family residential subdivision.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project will involve installation of a new sewer line within an existing sewer line ROW in order to accommodate the increased service necessary for the 401 Assemblage
project.
All work will be conducted in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Traditional equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, graders, and earth
movers. No SCMs are required. Impacts will be limited to the utility line corridor.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
20210211 44075 Offsite Wetlands Impacts.pdf 4.16MB

5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r" Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01270
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Timmons Group
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Timmons Group completed a delineation for a 5.57-acre area surrounding the proposed utility route on October 28, 2020. Consultation with the USACE and DWR for a Jurisdictional
Determination and Buffer Determination was initiated on January 14, 2021.
Dave Bailey of the USACE replied on January 14, 2021 stating no field verification from the Corps was necessary, and the delineation file would be used for issuance of a PJD and/or
permit review.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
2021.01.14_USACE Informal Confirmation.pdf 125.06KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes f No
7b. If yes, explain.
This is the second of two permit applications for the 401 Assemblage site. The first permit application was submitted in the fall of 2020 for the proposed residential development known
as 401 Assemblage. At the time of initial submittal the off -site utility requirement was not known. The 401 Permit and Buffer Authorization have been received for the initial submittal, with
404 Permit in progress. The original permit required the following impact totals:
0.05-acres of permanent wetland impact
0.03-acres of permanent -indirect loss wetland impact
0.07-acres of temporary wetland impact associated vnth a utility route
201-ft (0.02-acres) of permanent stream impact
48-ft (0.01-acres) of temporary stream impact
65-ft (0.01-acres) of permanent - no loss stream impact
16,191-sq ft of permanent Zone 1 Buffer Impact
15,028-sq ft of permanent Zone 2 Buffer Impact
As such, this second permit application for the off -site utility route is required.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
Yes. The above referenced original permit application is for use of NWP 29 and associated GC 4139.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory C^U
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries fJ Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * M
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Utility Line
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
N2
No
Both
0.071
(acres)
Utility Line
T
ffmland Hardwood Forest
02
��Both
]0.072
(acres)
Utility Line
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
02
L—A
Both
0.199
(acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.342 0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.342
2h. Comments:
Impacts were minimized by placing the proposed wetland impacts within a currently maintained herbaceous utility ROW. Temporary disturbance is
necessary to install the new sewer line. Wetlands are part of larger surrounding primarily forested wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction"
length*
g1
Utility Line
Temporary
Other JS2
Perennial
Both
9Average
3?i
(feet)
earfee )
$2
Utility Line
Temporary
Other JS2
Perennial
Both
60
Average (feet)
(lirearfeet)
S3
Utility Line
Temporary
Other JS2
Perennial
Both
8
21
Average (feet)
(lirear feet)
Utility Line
Temporary
Other JS2
��]Perennial
Both
1Average(fee)
2(liearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0 140
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
140
3j. Comments:
Proposed stream impacts are necessary for new line installation due to the need to place the new line within the eAsting utility line location. The line
location was based on requirements for gravity sewer line. Impacts will be temporary with streams restored following installation.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
FJ Meuse r Tar -Pamlico
F Catawba r Randleman
r" Goose Creek F Jordan Lake
F Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Utility Line Installation
T
S2
hlo
1,708
881
Utility Line Installation
T
S2
N.
3,356
1,659
Utility Line Installation
T
S2
N.
2,385
1,012
Utility Line Installation
T
S2
hlo
0
345
Utility Line Installation
T
S2
hb
1,962
2,914
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 9,411.00 6,811.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 9,411.00 6,811.00
6i. Comments:
Impacts are required for replacement of an existing sewer lines within an epsting sewer line right of way and maintenance corridor.

Supporting Documentation
20210211 44075 Offsite Wetlands Impacts.pdf 4.16MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning,
including utilization of the wetland/stream delineation to adjust the layout of the Site design to avoid and minimize impacts. The remaining impacts
proposed are necessary in order for the project's goals to be realized.
The utility route is planned along an existing utility line as a proposed utility line replacement to further avoid and minimize impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation as described in accordance with
the requirements of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual (May 2013)
and local codes. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. The contractor shall
install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, division ditches, temporary coffer dams, tree protection, and clearing only as necessary to install
devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case
less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is
required and will be kept by the owner's representative.
Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and
other pollutants from entering adjacent jurisdictional features. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill will be placed and contained
within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent jurisdictional features. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material
within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project construction activities initiated within
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance within jurisdictional waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes
r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
All impacts for the proposed project will be temporary for the installation of a replacement sewer line. Impacts will occur within an existing maintained utility line ROW consisting of
herbaceous vegetation and a golf course. The proposed utility line will utilize the existing 20-ft wide maintenance corridor for both construction and long term maintenance.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) u
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
R Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
20210211 44075 Offsite Wetlands Impacts.pdf 4.16MB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government f State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
R Phase II W NSW r USMP R Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Wake County

Comments:
The SMP for this project includes the full site, including both the development and off -site utility route. The off -site utility route portion of the site will not require use of SCMs as impacts
will be minimal and temporary. Total proposed impervious area for the offsite sewer line portion of the project is 0%.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The propose project is a utility route update for a proposed development, and accounts for all sanitary sewer needs for the project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A USFWS IPaC Report and NCNHP Natural Heritage Database Report were utilized for reviewof potential protected species in the vicinity of the
project Site. Species identified by IPaC as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the Site include: Michawes sumac, dwarf wedgemussel, red -cockaded
woodpecker, yellow lance, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, and Carolina madtom.
No consultation was initiated with the USFWS for the off -site utility line, however, the USFWS concurred with a "no effect" determination for the main
project site located immediately west of this site location. No new species were identified by the updated IPaC or NCNHP Report as potentially
occurring in the vicinity of the project location.
Based on the similarity of stream habitat and disturbed nature of terrestrial habitat (well shaded utility ROW and maintained golf course), it is the
opinion of Timmons Group that the proposed project Will have no effect on protected species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Explore Location resources.pdf
381.07KB
NCNHP Report.pdf
1.27MB
2020.09.01_USFWS Concurrence.pdf
91.19KB
T&E Review Package - 401 Assemblage.pdf
7.69MB

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes
r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes
r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Based on a search of the NC SHPO HPOWEB application, there are no historic resources within the project site and nineteen historic resources
located within 1-mile of the project site. Of those resources, one is National Register listed and one is Study Listed. However, the nearest historic
resource is located approximately 0.32-miles away.
Due to the distance from historic resources and the nature of the proposed project, an underground sewer line, it is the opinion of Timmons that the
proposed utility line installation will have no effect on historic resources.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HPOWEB 2.0 Map - Utility Line.pdf 699.59KB
SHPO Search Results - Utility Line.pdf 70.09KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes
r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Based on a review of FEMA FIRM panels 3720079000J and 3720069900J, effective 05/02/2006, the proposed site is located within Zone X areas
outside of the 100-year floodplain.
Miscellaneous
Comments
A photo document is attached depicting the portion of the existing maintained utility line to be impacted within forested areas.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Photodoc_Existing Utility Line.pdf 180.59KB
Signature
FZ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Lauren Norris -Heflin
Signature
Date
2/15/2021

TIMM.ONGROUP
YOUR V151C)N ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Who It May Concern:
NCD-EQ — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersl'ed, a duly authoried owner of record of the property/propertignes identified herein, do
0
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources (DA R) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose ot
IP
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject
to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
d Harbors Act of 1899.
This the f ' ? day of AIV.
(number) (Month)
zoo 1.
(Year)
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.,
Project Name: 401 Assemblage - Utility Route
06995822141) 07908069909 07908056625 0790807968, 07908055425, 0790806712, 0699892857,
Parcel ID: 0790806851, **Note, access within existing portions of existing City of Raleigheaw-owments only,
�Fn��TRnIr5�
Site Address: Okamato Street,, Saint Mellion Street, and Competition Road, Garner, N..0
Property Owner's Name (Print): Muljiple O'06wners, City of Raleigh ROW Owner ---I
Property Owner's S1*gnature:
Property Owner'
s Mailing
P S9
I i /go;,) /006b
Property Owner's Telephone.
Property Owner's Email Address:
Fax No
0
U
z
%ft
-C
CA
dWOMPI
N
0
0
T-4
qt
UP)
0
r.
U
L4
Q)
ce
E
CL
0
Q)
0
W
Lk
Ln
00
LL
Uri
M
140
00
.
Cn
LU

0l► L"We1:1•

Path: Y:\805\44075 - 401 Assemblage\GIS\44075-JD-NRCS - Utilityl-ine.mxd
{ - e
f N- V
S
•C rri
r� F
• , -%!r r
— f• rt 1
. C 0 2 a=
OF 211
A
Site Limits
1
1 d '
'• �.
-01�- jrj
L
+r
r• _ A902
pv76.
Site limits are approximate.
NRCS Soil Survey: Wake County (1970). �•
0 410 820 1,230 1 640NMNNq
_
Feet
401 ASSEMBLAGE - UTILITY LINE T I M M O N S GROUP
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA°
FIGURE 5: NRCS MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 44075 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): LAKE WHEELER
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 5.57ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 35.673782 WATERSHED(S): UPPER NEUSE (NEUSE RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-78.671471 UTM: 17S 710744 3950265 e or in HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03020201
ese o ans an associate ocunnents are t e exc usrve orooertv o an may not a repro uce in w o Dart an s a no[ a used Tor anv ouroose w atsoever. inc usrve. ut not
o construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

401 ASSEMBLAGE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - OFFSITE
GARNER, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
VICINITY MAP
1" = 1000'
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Sheet List Table
Sheet
Number
Sheet Title
CWI-2.0
COVER SHEET
CWI-2.1
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS
CWI-2.3
OVERALL OFFSITE SANITARY IMPACT MAP
CWI-2.4
OFFSITE SANITARY IMPACT MAP DETAIL
CWI-2.5
OFFSITE SANITARY IMPACT MAP DETAIL
CWI-2.6
OFFSITE SANITARY IMPACT MAP DETAIL
CWI-2.7
JOFFSITE SANITARY IMPACT MAP DETAIL
CWI-2.8
JOFFSITE SANITARY IMPACT MAP DETAIL
SITE DATA TABLE:
TOTAL AREA- 277.43 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS- 5.29 ACRES (230,534 SF)
TOTAL STREAMS- 21,992 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS- 116.52 ACRES (42.0%)
--), FOR OFFSITE SEWER LINE- 0 ACRES (0%)
NOTES:
1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION TAKE FROM SURVEY BY
TIMMONS GROUP DATED JAN 15, 2020.
2. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION COMBINED FROM
WAKE COUNTY GIS AND SURVEY BY TIMMONS
GROUP DATED JUN 30, 2020.
3. PRELIMINARY STREAMS & WETLAND DELINEATION
BY TIMMONS GROUP DATED JULY 27, 2020.
4. PER FIRM MAP #3720079000J DATED 05/02/2006
AND FIRM MAP #3720069900J DATE 05/02/2006,
THERE ARE NO FEMA DESIGNATED FLOOD AREAS
ON THIS SITE.
5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH TOWN OF GARNER AND NCDOT STANDARDS
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
0
0
0
0
•
••
H
0211012021
DRA BY
331
DESIGNED BY
331
CHECKED BY
MVZ
SCALE
1" = 1000'
(D
J T
m 0 -
o
W� wt
z w
c'!^) o =
V / Y U-) c
o
�< UE
44075
CWI-2.0 1

000
o
POND Z \ ( \ \
0 co
1
\
1 / t 1 �/ f t �- 1 1 ( r.,� ' r , r FEMA FLOODPLAIN ! Av,
—
Opp
w
/ j`j PONDU2
/ // / / r✓ i, % ,fix: / r/ J , / . ) f ,� -� _ . WETLAND J' = : +� -'`
_ r / j Q /
PONDA2 .t - _ f - / -�.. Cb'�
w� `STREAM �j
- i J / ,,� /, ♦ 'ii/ -/
/ S l ' / Q; /'tin/'• ` t 1 ✓ r� r �` % f t L~ / 1 / / �C
1 °e�i / / r r I / { S f /j . _� v I / r r /• / f .< l / ` ®
o
1 /J P�'►• J• 4 J b I
1 ! `�F.� 7 � _ s � �L .` <
"`
v i \� ` �•• � ,� 0.„ ._,., •.�,� \ =.� `
�� \ j i rs _ !� �.� 2 ` _ _ - _ �J STREAM 62
SANITARY STREAM T2
� � •s+r •r J ,r.+r'' S ,� � ` '� • � r :. 1t ,,. _ - -�\` -. / DO J � /lll.
3 �J n SEWER MAIN'
r *
} r 2
/ ; ' /
0
0
DATE
l �i- .`� '".'.•t,,,+C . • r Y r''r:.. : L/ L y \/'�) r r /}!
—
/ l L2�/ e \ r
.. r tC�Y• ! i �i r`� Q ( / //
0211012021
rw r. %f / WETLAND Q2�
/ 1 I' t( • /s " ' �" e / °/ Z I / X4, d i� /. WETLAND R2 r I
WETLAND B2 r / r r w - WETLAND I /1.
DRAMB
331
/
�` / / �O /
WETLAND D2 _ r / f / - r r / / / '/
I �' /�1 / // / i / •ii l ` , {
I ) �l i r y ` \ W •n-.'s T I � � . i + ., f ` /% •l — J,
/
DESIGNED BY
331
j/ rr
� `
Q _ - WETLAND J2 / J ` / Q ✓ / /�/�/ J / < 1 J \
'~ r
�••''
CHECKED BY
rc' TOP OF BANK ='30 = �' _ O,r
\ ' " /r /^� w ,, r r . r — `" ^'\.�/ �EAGLE�ZIDGE GOLF COU,5$E 1t
M-
\ r
! "" / K r 1 4 \ • \ j\ ."" .�. l� \. f J ~ r• v _ ��% • ` //%�' r/ „ O '
W
r /� ( r
• •
SCALE
/ i / / / /' Y \ ` ,,_ / r. ti t. �� n i✓/�-i •N� y l��frjOYa d i 1 /
WETLAND E2 I ,
1"=500'
WETLAND C2 ���\ STREAM A
-• r r ✓ --_ _, WETLAND P2
s ��\ ) �\ _ M J 4
' / // t // / r - a, �5• 1. !'' " `_ =-\%� ^' \ �{ ) I WETLAND K2
rl ;' r .�i /
`,
/ /`WETLAND 02 r
f WETLAND F2 l
✓ 'ACCESS EASEMENT
/ J STREAM S2
t \
\\ t WETLAND G2 - f / \ �s ` •.
J v t� WETLAND N2 ; �/ / Z
o
I ,
WETLAND H2 1 ( I !' �r 1 r / t ✓// 17� / \\� (�
/ 1 / % ) \ \� , / - . / 1 '` �`• -1 t , 1� ^,, r / / / / /'� / . /� / \`� n ^t ) \ SCALE 1 "=500'
'
W a
z
�
STREAM V r e^ \ 4 J / / / / 2$Q L / < / \
�- / �/ / I •` '� \ .I / - / // J ( �� / , / 1 \ \ 0 560' 1000,
` / ♦ WETLAND Q , STREAM C t ` �� _ s -
-Aw J fff/ / v / 0 - \ r ' / (
QNOR
00 0
O
0
\ r . // /, J / t
z
Z
��=� %r 1 / o ) s \ LEGEND
/ /.
U
- ti v ti Y /�11� I �,
. WET�LA-ND 12~/�° I z ` ` / r
1 -� �i / / - - _ v •-^ ^WETLAND Y \ �% rr t I / , '( V ( l� / PROPOSED CONTOUR
r /r y / /
/ /--------- EXISTING CONTOUR
`
'w/�
v, O
a 3
H
\` TOP OF BANK~ / / `t/ r �/ "/' �! STREAM S2 I / r
11 l/` `� yy / \ ,�1 ( r / PROPOSED DRAIN EASEMENT
f • % /� �// 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLOODPLAIN
d
O �
u)
H
f,.Y ` `��//)�\ i
\r (\
^SANITARY
w
•W •W •WWWWWW WETLANDS
\ \ _1` \ 1 _, \• ` //• / / (\\\� \ t f J / _ \ \ : " — ^ t SEWER ( (�/ J ��
/ \ WETLAND R, S, T, & U 1 \\\ r / , / `l_ l / ' \ \
WETLAND W & X \ 4 \ '
O
J
1 ! , — \\ EASEMENT I
w
�. / ,) r / . r /�� / ✓/� �/ \\ \ \ r / i�� ') \ / (j SITE DATA TABLE:
TOTAL AREA' 277.43 ACRES
I
TOTAL WETLANDS' 5.29 ACRES (230,534 SF)
I
/ (
\X\\` 1fI t
TOTAL STREAMS' 21,992 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS' 116.52 ACRES (42.0%)
\\ /
°B°°
44075
\1�11ir\_ `
�
���-` �� FOR OFFSITE SEWER LINE- 0 ACRES (0%)
SHEET NO.
CWI-2.1

W ETLA N D AN D STREAM IMPACTS
co
\ }
11
o
WETLAND IMPACT STREAM IMPACT 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT
MAP IMPACT
IMPACT SPECIFICATION
20' ZONE 21MPACT \\�\� \ — \� �/ ��
\\ �� . SANITARY SEWER MAIN o o ��y /
®
° E
w z E
SHEET NUMBER PERMANENT
(SF) (AC)
TEMPORARY PERMANENT TEMPORARY TEMPORARY
(SF) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) (SF) (AC)
TEMPORARY \\\\� \ �/
. \��� \ TIE TO PUMP STATION®� e
(SF) (AC) i ��\ ���\ \ \ v6— 07 op® r q ®
//~\ ��� �° 1 0�
s
v
2�
�LL
CWI-2.3 1 Sanitary Line Improvements
CWI 2.4 2 Sanitary Line Improvements
3,082 0.071 32 302 0.007 1708 0.04
60 396 0.009 3,356 0.08
881 0.020 \ \ \\ \ $� I
1,659 0.038 III\ �� \\�� ° !o l - �N
ooM
CWI 2.5 3 Sanitary Line Improvements
3,125 0.072 21 165 0.004 2,385 0.05
\\ ��� \°° _o ��� d° f 1
1,012 0.023 \\\ \�\\�� o
CWI-2.6 4 San ita ry Li ne I m rove ments
8,652 0.199
EXISTING POND 1
345 0.008 \
z
0,0 NO IMPACT \
I / \ 2\\ \ \ \ \\ /
F F
CWI-2.7 5 Sanitary Line Improvements
TOTAL
27 279 OAD6 1,962 0.05
14,858 0,341 141 1,142 0.026 91411 0.216
/\ \ I\ /1
2,914 O.D67 , off,
� ° ° /
6,812 0.156///\\ �O
U
/) FEMA FLOODPLAIN
f
IMPACT 5 '
o
SEE SHEET CWI-2.7
SANITARY SEWER MAIN llJ/lll ` 26U///) ix-ii
1 /��
TO BE IMPROVED
30 0 � �,
I !l �.28�'/j
0
DATE
021:01202:
DRAB BY
[) S i.
[i �
$ l /' J J l
� ��' �
/ /
IMPACT 4 p
y�SEESHEETCWI-2.6�'
� � �' // � /
�� / 50' STREAM BUFFER t ,
�' / ��
-�-- %
�1t1 1
331
•
•
DESIGNED BY
DESIGNED
331
HEB
S /1 _\\\ I I\r
1 J
' , ,
�11!/ \ \
. •
•
SCALE
1"_300'
/ /
/'I
o
IMPACT 3 / /
SEE SHEET CWI-2.5
i/ G 1 \ ( /
•
�j \EAGLE RIDGE GOLF COURSE /� f
C.IL
{l Lr /I�(z)
PROPOSED SEWER LINE
1
�� �'
// /'Jill/I� o�
/�J �/ / Co/l�
�•��" \� WETLANDS J �ir� ! _,
o; ° r /J NIA N
�iJ%
` --
�� /
rn 1^1 ✓ ��'' d STREAM / '280
II,
S $ $' /
ETLANDS, �� �/ l il� �' i� �/ /� .�/ / (►r�r /,� / 11—
/
� � � r � 50' STREAM BUFFER �
w z
J
L�
I—
SITE DATA TABLE:
J
a
s—
$ SANITA s SEWER
��
I / IMPACT 2
-_ �- 1 TOTAL AREA: 277.43 ACRES
/%`/
5 }, \ , �,/
I
J
z
�
s SAS s
s g " SEE SHEET CWI,2.4
J TOTAL WETLANDS: 5.29 ACRES (230 534 SF)
>�
wza
_
TOTAL STREAMS: 21,992 LF
�f^
°
z
a �j
j cJ' / „IMPACT 1 __ ' '
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 116.52 ACRES (42.0%)
Vl
Q 3
can
$ J � SEE SHEET CWI-2.3 � � I
PQ
OLL
, / � � FOR OFFSITE SEWER LINE: 0 ACRES (0%)
�
0
LU
i / l
LL
OJ
\
„_ WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
SCALE 1 -300
O
.PROPOSED LINE TIE IN TO EXISTING
PERMANENT WETLANDS - GREEN
0 360' 600' TEMPORARY WETLANDS -GREY
0
\ ^
'
50' STREAM
BUFFER - 1
"r� 1 j r
°°°°°° PERMANENT STREAM - ORANGE
/ STREAM
TEMPORARY STREAM - BLUE
Know what's below. ® TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT - PINK
�✓
l
-`�
/ / i r r
\
_
v ✓
Call before you dig.
Z TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT - YELLOW
ICE NO
44075
SHEET No.
CWI-2.2

28� ' NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD
50' STREAM BUFFER
PROPOSED SEWER LINE . �TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 1 265
TO TIE INTO EXISTING SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS I 20' SEWER
32 LF AND 302 SF EASEMENT
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT 1
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS STREAM
5 � BUFFER
�O S+ 3,082 SF
00
o
\ � W V• W W V• W V• I�
\ WWLW W W iy/y�IL W WWWWWWWWWW y W W WWWWWW /
V- W V- W W W W V- W WY •Y W W W V- W W V- W V- W V-
W V- W W V- W V- W W V- �•/.Y�yW W Y W •Y W W •Y J
W V• W W V• .: W V• W W V• V►(I/y W .:• W W W W W W
V• W W V• v- � V• W V• W W Y
STREAM BUFFER W W W W W- W W W W� uuu 8+5
• V• WWWWV•WWW�WWWWWV•WWW W S vJvv ,. S
/` / V- WWWWWWWWWWWWW�WWyv� n r J
/ WETLAND N2
TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT 1
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
1,708 SF STREAM S2
EDGE OF CREEK TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT 1
2> `�V SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS �270, \
881 SF
/
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
M �
< o
z N
Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
• Contractor shall notify the Town of Garner Public Works 48-hours
in advance of start of work during a period of time with no rain in
the forecast.
• Prior to start of work, contractor shall have all materials and
equipment on -site. For utility crossings with casings, the carrier
pipe shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut
activities.
• Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam on the upstream
side of the proposed crossing and pump water around the open cut
area to the downstream side.
• Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe
at elevations shown on the approved plans and backfill in
accordance with Town of Garner specifications.
• Contractor shall restore channel and stabilize any disturbance
within 24-hours of start of work.
275 F EXISTING GRADE
NFAI
SSMH-2-
270
INV W 25
9.10 (1 (2))
_
�INV OUT
259.08 (1 (3)
J
�65
265
SS
H-1-E
TOP
267.57
NV IN 258.0
(1 (3))
IN
OUT 257.8
(1 (4))
60
25
.33' OF
I
255 8" Ouctile
Iron
255
@
0.57%
174.5
' OF
8"Ductile
Iron
@ 0.
7%
250
250
245
245
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SCALE 1 "=60' 5+31
NOR
0 60, 120'
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
® PERMANENT WETLANDS - GREEN
_ TEMPORARY WETLANDS - GREY
PERMANENT STREAM - ORANGE
TEMPORARY STREAM - BLUE
TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT - PINK
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT - YELLOW
6+00 7+00 $+00
IMPACT 1
HORIZ SCALE: 1 "=60'
VERT SCALE: 1 "=6
8+75.26
0
0
0
O
••
Z
O
i
E
H
0211012021
DRAWN BY
331
DESIGNED BY
331
CHECKED BY
MVZ
SCALE
1 "=60'
W z w
0 0
JQ
LU z UE
U7 0 Q
v) a 3
w Q
�< zE
�LU
O
44075
CWI-2.3 I

TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT 2
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
3,356 SF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 2
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
/! TOTAL OF 60 LF AND 396 SF
/
STREAM S2
WETLAND 02 WWW YWWWW .�
v- v-
V-
W W
W W
V-
r W W W V•
W W W W
265_ r
SCALE 1 "=60'
i
50' STREAM BUFFER 0 60' 120'
�r
� E
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT 2
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
1,659 SF
27.r,
f
r
L
EAGLE RIDGE
5 ; GOLF COURSE
26
I /
o
-Y __— 20' SEWER EASEMENT
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
• Contractor shall notify the Town of Garner Public Works 48-hours
in advance of start of work during a period of time with no rain in
the forecast.
• Prior to start of work, contractor shall have all materials and
equipment on -site. For utility crossings with casings, the carrier
pipe shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut
activities.
• Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam on the upstream
side of the proposed crossing and pump water around the open cut
area to the downstream side.
• Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe
at elevations shown on the approved plans and backfill in
accordance with Town of Garner specifications.
• Contractor shall restore channel and stabilize any disturbance
within 24-hours of start of work.
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
® PERMANENT WETLANDS - GREEN
TEMPORARY WETLANDS - GREY
PERMANENT STREAM - ORANGE
TEMPORARY STREAM - BLUE
® TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT - PINK
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT - YELLOW
77S
SS
H-1-E
EXISTING GRADE
TOP
26757
IN
IN 258.08 (1
(3))
270.1 lNil
OUT 257.81
1 4
270
TOP 267
04
INV
N 256.06 (1
4))
INV 01
IT 256.00 (1
5))
265
265
260
260
I
340. 07 ' OF
255
10 " P 11r.,
255
@ 0.51
250
250
245
245
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
8+30 9+00 10+00 11+00
IMPACT 2
HORIZ SCALE: 1 "=60'
VERT SCALE: 1 "=6
12+00 12+60
0
0
0
a
DATE
1 0211012021
331
DESIGNED BY
•
•
331
•
CHECKED BY
MVZ
• •
SCALE
•
1 "=60'
•
•
•
O
J
LU z
0
LU
J
0
a
T
K
C 0z
Q
_
N
>
LULU
z
U
U7 o
Y
a3�
a
Z
0.�
z
O
LU
U4)LL
LL
0
0
GB NG.
44075
SHEET N0.
CWI-2.4

28
/
^� 20' SEWER EASEMENT
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 3
WAIN I1/-XMY UIVC IIV1t MUVCIVICIV1J
21 LF AND 165 SF
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT 3
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
1,012 SF 6 /
WETLAND 02 WW YWWW YWW Y J��
/ ` W W W V' ••
/ � �W V'W V•W W
265
v i
r—
'�� 50' STREAM BUFFER
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
/kGJC
i
- WETLAND P2�/ / N6 /
W W
W V'
SCALE 1 "=60'
50' STREAM
BUFFER 0 60, 120'
TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT 3
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
2,385 SF
L STREAM S2
r.�
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT 3
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
3,125 SF
EAGLE RIDGE GOLF COURSE
Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
• Contractor shall notify the Town of Garner Public Works 48-hours
in advance of start of work during a period of time with no rain in
the forecast.
• Prior to start of work, contractor shall have all materials and
equipment on -site. For utility crossings with casings, the carrier
pipe shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut
activities.
• Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam on the upstream
side of the proposed crossing and pump water around the open cut
area to the downstream side.
• Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe
at elevations shown on the approved plans and backfill in
accordance with Town of Garner specifications.
• Contractor shall restore channel and stabilize any disturbance
within 24-hours of start of work.
ti
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
® PERMANENT WETLANDS - GREEN
TEMPORARY WETLANDS - GREY
oeoeoe PERMANENT STREAM - ORANGE
TEMPORARY STREAM - BLUE
® TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT - PINK
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT - YELLOW
270
270
EXISTING
GRADE
265,,
265
/
SSMH-
-E
—
TOP 264.39
INV
N 254.07 (1
))
260
260
255
255
399.9
' OF
10"
VC
@ 0.
8
250
250
o
rn
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
cMo
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ll
12+25.78 13+00
14+00 15+00
IMPACT 3
HORIZ SCALE: 1 "=60'
VERT SCALE: 1 "=6
0
0
O
0211012021
DRAWN BY
331
• DESIGNED BY
• 331
• CHECKED BY
M-
• • scA�E
• 1 "=60'
•
•
•
O
F
W z i
o c
a�
J = `
K '
o �
F
LU zc
(n o `
U e
Y `
< Q F
w.
Z
Oz
O
`
F
Cla
um
16+Oa6+20
E_
JOB NO
44075
SHEET NO
CWI-2.5
_
�E

5
TEMPORARY WETLANDS IMPACT 4
/ SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS / / I260
WW W 'W WWI 00
N 8,652 SF
6'0
L./
21 0 / / / / W W W WWWWWW WWW W WWWW
/ !/� W W W W W W W W W W W W W
/ / / W WWW W W WFA�vW W WWWWWWW 20' SEWER EASEMENT
210
265� W 7I"W W W W W W W W �f
W W W W W
/ W W W W W
/ / / / W WW�y %�vW W W WWWWWWWWW W WETLAND Q2
' / � / WWWWW "0��� WWWWW WWWW WWW W
/
/ / / WWWWWW WWWWWWWW WWWW
/ W WWWW WWW W WWWWWWWWWW /
W W W W W W W W
. WWW W.WW WWW WW WWWW.WWWW WSW
/ / wWwWvWwW JWU W vwWvWwWwWvW
W W W °� W WWWWWWW EAGLE RIDGE
W W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W 50' STREAM BUFFER GOLF COURSE
WWWW W y W ; W WWWW
W W W W W
W W W W W W
�k�0 W" WWW TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT 4
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS �Fti
345 SF
SCALE 1 "=60'
0
NOR
60, 120'
M
0
z
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
PERMANENT WETLANDS - GREEN
TEMPORARY WETLANDS - GREY
PERMANENT STREAM - ORANGE
TEMPORARY STREAM - BLUE
®
TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT - PINK
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT - YELLOW
Know what's below.
CBII before you dig.
0
N
Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
• Contractor shall notify the Town of Garner Public Works 48-hours
in advance of start of work during a period of time with no rain in
the forecast.
• Prior to start of work, contractor shall have all materials and
equipment on -site. For utility crossings with casings, the carrier
pipe shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut
activities.
• Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam on the upstream
side of the proposed crossing and pump water around the open cut
area to the downstream side.
• Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe
at elevations shown on the approved plans and backfill in
accordance with Town of Garner specifications.
• Contractor shall restore channel and stabilize any disturbance
within 24-hours of start of work.
r EXISTING GRADE
265
260
_ -
260
_
S
MH-C-E
255
TOP
258.43
255
4
IN
OUT 252.3 (1 (7))
00. 63 ' OF
409.38'
OF
250
90" PVC
10" P
C
250
°
@ 0.5
245
245
rr
o
co
o
rn
o
o
LO
rn
rn
o
0
N
N
o
o
a5
a�
o0
00
05
a�
o
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
16+70.4117+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
IMPACT 4
HORIZ SCALE: 1 "=60'
VERT SCALE: 1 "=6
21+00
22+00 22+40.55
O
0
0
w
o
� DATE
0211012021
331
DESIGNED BY
•
•
331
.
CHECKED BY
MVZ
• •
SCALE
•
1 "=60'
•
•
•
O
J
w Z
0
W
Ja
0
W K
o
Q
�
LU z
U
in o
Y
a3�
a
z
O
w
U4)LL
LL
0
IGB NO.
44075
SHEET NO.
CWI-2.6

1 I EAGLE RIDGE
N� GOLF COURSE
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT 5
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
2,914 SF
50' STREAM BUFFER
❑ ❑
�nr
I
STREAM S2 WW `
WETLAND R2 /
/
TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT 5
SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS
1,962 SF
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
M
J
N 20' SEWER EASEMENT
I
I
I
\ \ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 5
\ \ \ SANITARY LINE IMPROVEMENTS 1
\ 27 LF AND 279 SF
STREAM T2TC/11V1
I
• Contractor shall notify the Town of Garner Public Works 48-hours
in advance of start of work during a period of time with no rain in
the forecast.
• Prior to start of work, contractor shall have all materials and
equipment on -site. For utility crossings with casings, the carrier
pipe shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut
activities.
• Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam on the upstream
side of the proposed crossing and pump water around the open cut
area to the downstream side.
• Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe
at elevations shown on the approved plans and backfill in
accordance with Town of Garner specifications.
• Contractor shall restore channel and stabilize any disturbance
within 24-hours of start of work.
SCALE 1 "=60'
0 60' 120'
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
® PERMANENT WETLANDS - GREEN
TEMPORARY WETLANDS - GREY
PERMANENT STREAM - ORANGE
TEMPORARY STREAM - BLUE
TEMPORARY 30' ZONE 1 IMPACT - PINK
TEMPORARY 20' ZONE 2 IMPACT - YELLOW
260
260
SSMH-H-
TOP 255.44
S
MH-G-E
INV IN 2
0.50 (1 (11))
TOP
254.4E
INV OUT 2
0.50(1(12))
INV IN 240.
6 (1 (10))
255
1-1
55
/1250,
250
—
EXISTING GRADE
2
—.
386 71-
45
240
10"PV
178%
10" PVC
@ 0.04
235
235
12" PVC
@ -0.24
V.
230
230
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
31+20 32+00 33+00 34+00
IMPACT 5
HORIZ SCALE: 1 "=60'
VERT SCALE: 1 "=6
34+91.15
0
0
0
w
a
o
DATE
0 02/10/2021
331
DESIGNED BY
•
•
331
.
CHECKED BY
MVZ
• •
scALE
•
1 "=60'
•
•
•
O
J
LU z
0
LU
J
0
a
,
K
o
Q
L
Ln
'
LU z
U
U7 0
Y
a3�
a
Z
<�
z
O
w
0
L
LL
O
IOBNO
44075
SHEET NG.
CwI-2.7

Lauren Norris -Heflin
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) < [e-mail] >
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 01:12 PM
To: Lauren Norris -Heflin
Cc: Morgan Gilbert; Brigham, Joshua S
Subject: RE: 401 Assemblage (SAW-2020-01270) Utility Route PJD Request
CAUTinN• This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Lauren. Based on previous delineations and remotely sensed information, including aerial photos and QL2 LiDAR, I will
proceed with an office verification of the delineation of potential waters of the US for the 401 Assemblage utility route
(part of SAW-2020-01270). As such, no field verification from the Corps is necessary.
I will use the maps titled "Figure 6: Wetlands and Waters Delineation Map", Sheets 1 through 4, from your PJD request
when processing the PJD and/or permit application/request for this site.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Lauren Norris -Heflin <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 9:50 AM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Morgan Gilbert
<[e-mail]>; Brigham, Joshua S <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] 401 Assemblage (SAW-2020-01270) Utility Route PJD Request
Good morning,
On behalf of RST Development, LLC, we are submitting this preliminary jurisdictional determination request package for
the proposed off -site utility route associated with 401 Assemblage, located east of the intersection of Hwy 401 and
Caddy Rd, Garner, NC (Wake County).

2/10/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information. 11
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.-
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
18 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 1 /11

Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
IPaC: Explore Location resources
�o�
Foy
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 2/11

IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 3/11

Oft 117 I ail
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed Threatened
STATUS
Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
16
Clams O;Z
NAM E GSTATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fuscoqgaia masoni. Proposed Threatened
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
��ar'f Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/451 1
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 4/11

2/10/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httpL.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
t\0�
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory ) N
Birds Treaty Act of 191.8. -
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle ProLectiA Act'of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservatln-concern.php
Measures forivoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 5/11

f�a1117 I ail
IPaC: Explore Location resources
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
......................................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
.....................................................................................
PROJECTAREA SOMETIME WITHIN
..............................................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
.........................................................................................
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
...................................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
........................................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACRO S
...........................................................................................................
ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREED
.......................................................................................
ELSEWHERE'' INDICATES THO
.................................................................................................
THE BIRD DOE�i�OT LIKELY
...................................... ;W.
:............................................
BREED IN -YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
........................................................................................................
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential 0%
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of developmen
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
eft
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
}
% : NUOOF
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
vo%.% —
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 6/11

f�a1117 I ail
IPaC: Explore Location resources
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week.
For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5
of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. %
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2. A 4
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 7/11

IPaC: Explore Location resources
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur
and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird
species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development. 11111
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in
your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere"
is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 8/11

Oft 117 I ail
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information n
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pa
Loring.
to
What if I have eagles on my list?
.001
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain ae��,;+ to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur. +
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report.,
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 9/11

IPaC: Explore Location resources
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army CQrpIV-0—f
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands: !lllllll6
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND lop
PF01 A 0
PF01MAC
J
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
11
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the
use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 10/11

PRO 117MIYA
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
�oOe
Foy
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/IF52GPPPSVBKRPHAT6HY3K72K4/resources 11 /11

Roy Cooper, Governor
■-■1111I■
B! 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■E■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■■■■■
February 10, 2021
Lauren Norris -Heflin
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE. 401 Assemblage Utility Line - Approximate Review Area
Dear Lauren Norris -Heflin.
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Slewardsh ip
NCNHDE-13955
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1GS1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
401 Assemblage Utility Line - Approximate Review Area
February 10, 2021
NCNHDE-13955
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Ma=ed 7rea Name wner Owner Type
North American Land Trust Easement North American Land Trust Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on February 10, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
401 Assemblage Utility Line - Approximate Review Area
February 10, 2021
NCNHDE-13955
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common NameADate
Last qF Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
i ' Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name =Owner
City of Raleigh Open Space - Lake Benson City of Raleigh
Wake County Easement Wake County
North American Land Trust Easement North American Land Trust
Wake County Easement
Wake County Open Space - OS-031
Town of Garner - Swift Creek Greenway
Wake County Open Space
Town of Garner Open Space
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
City of Raleigh Open Space
Wake County
Wake County
Town of Garner
Wake County
Town of Garner
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
City of Raleigh
N1er Type M
Local Government
Local Government
Private
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on February 10, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-13955: 401 Assemblage Utility Line -Approximate Review Area
, .L.'
SFacei fi
p Z
o
-
��, � mmnor e`dee or
o�
O
yae
rtd
si
i Punana p
_
- ?,
v
eeh�
C�
�
MrssA� 4 ao�kDo
N
aO
® can
p
�avr
�
ty�
FarkwaY pr
".+eek F'
_
Wnnhni D
J�
uY(I+
N�'n7 GarJ"�
l
�"I'.
S.S Va
Cm u, pi,r
Garrer
'
Country CWb
^Sr
V
\V;�te N•Yrt.
F;I F:�iin. Li'i
- �J Compe Lrpr,
Dr
"_ 0
Ra
:Cullers Crossroads"�
Lon " certie
t
5�'
'63
e` � a
seas�are St
,e'ner o*
\cF
a
i •. f ;^ 4mner`�
4,a
Hurst D.
c rope
O
t—t,•.,�
McCullers
'+c
u
E,—rn Cr
_
S
February 10, 2021
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
1:24,121
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NIL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 4 of 4

Lauren Norris -Heflin
From: Matthews, Kathryn H <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 08:11
To: Lauren Norris -Heflin
Cc: Kate Hefner; Mann, Leigh; Raleigh, FW4; Sydni Law
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] T&E Self Certification Review Request - 401 Assemblage - Garner, NC
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hi Lauren,
The Service concurs with your species determinations for the 401 Assemblage project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review. Let me know if you have any questions.
Kathy Matthews
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-856-4520, x. 27

T 1 M M� N 5 GROUP 5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
Suite 102 F 919.859.5663
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS, Raleigh, NC 27607 www.timmons.com
From: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
[e-mail]
[phone]
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
August 18, 2020
Re: Online Project Review Request, 401 Assemblage, Wake County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Benjamin,
We have reviewed the referenced project using the North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review in August of 2020 and are submitting our project review package in
accordance with the instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of a residential development with associated amenities and
infrastructure. Development is anticipated to include the construction of subdivision roads across
two jurisdictional streams and their corresponding riparian buffers. Minor wetland impacts are
anticipated for the proposed road crossings. Currently, no wetland, stream, or riparian buffer
impacts are anticipated to be associated with the construction of the residential lots.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps (Figures 1 and
2 in Appendix C, including a USGS topographic map and aerial imagery).
The project is expected to be completed over several years. Construction is anticipated to take
place around late 2020 through 2021.
This project review is needed as supplement to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers consultation for
use of a Nationwide Permit due to impacts to jurisdictional waters anticipated with the proposed
construction of subdivision roads.
The USFWS IPaC search for the Site (Consultation Code 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1630, Event
Code 04EN2000-2020E-03708) identified three federally listed endangered species and one
federally listed threatened species as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the Site: Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolate), respectively.
Additionally, lPaC identified two federally proposed threatened and one federally proposed

endangered species: Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia
masoni), and Carolina madtom (Noturus furiosus), respectively. No critical habitat was identified
within the project area . Additionally, per the instructions of the Raleigh Field Office's Project
Review Steps, Timmons personnel assessed the potential for impacts to the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
Effects to critical habitat
There is no critical habitat located within the Site boundaries or a 1-mile radius.
Effects to federally endangered species
The majority of the Site consists of predominantly hardwood forest and active cattle pasture.
Approximately 35 acres of the Site consists of maintained pine plantation with approximately
15- to 20-year old pine trees. No potentially suitable roosting habitat is located within or in the
immediate vicinity of the project area. Further, no occurrences of red -cockaded woodpecker
were noted during the Site inspection or through review of NCNHP data. Therefore, it is the
opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have no effect on the red -cockaded
woodpecker.
There are two stream features within the Site proposed to be impacted of appropriate size to
potentially serve as suitable habitat for aquatic species. The southern -most stream is located
within an active cattle pasture and shows signs of active degradation from cattle activity and
downcutting. The forested stream in the northern portion of the Site displays more favorable
conditions aquatic species; however, a man-made pond impounded by an earthen dam with no
apparent outlet is located down -stream, preventing the migration of aquatic species to areas of
proposed impact. Further, no signs of mollusks, mollusk shells, or protected aquatic species were
observed during the Site inspection. A review of the NCNHP data revealed no known
occurrences of the dwarf wedgemussel within a one -mile radius of the Site boundaries or within
the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed
disturbance will have no effect on the dwarf wedgemussel.
During the Site inspection, potentially low -quality habitat for Michaux's sumac was observed
along unpaved access roads through the Site. However, these areas are well shaded by the mature
forest canopy overhead. Further, there are no noted occurrences of Michaux's sumac in the
vicinity of the project area and no occurrences were observed at the time of inspection.
Therefore, due to the lack of documented occurrences within one mile of the Site, the lack of
observances, and the absence of suitable habitat, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed
disturbance will have no effect on Michaux's sumac.
Effects to federally threatened endangered species
The two stream features within the Site proposed to be disturbed are of the appropriate size to
potentially constitute suitable habitat for the yellow lance. However, as discussed above, the
southern -most stream was observed to be severely disturbed from surrounding cattle pasture use
and the northern -most stream has a down -stream, impounded man-made pond. Further, no
occurrences were observed at the time of inspection and a review of the NCNHP data revealed
no known occurrences of the yellow lance within a one -mile radius of the Site boundaries or
within the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any

T 1 M M� N 5 GROUP 5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
Suite 102 F 919.859.5663
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS, Raleigh, NC 27607 www.timmons.com
proposed disturbance will have no effect on the yellow lance.
Effects to proposed federally protected species
Due to the low quality nature of the southern -most stream to be impacted and the down -stream
impoundment of the northern -most stream, it is the opinion of Timmons that the proposed
project will have no effect on the Neuse River waterdog, Carolina madtom,affect and the Atlantic
pigtoe.
Effects to federally protected species not identified through IPaC
The majority of the Site consists of hardwood forest and active cattle pasture with approximately
35 acres of pine plantation located in the northern portion. Forested areas observed on -Site
contain several trees that could represent potentially suitable summer roosting habitat for the
northern long-eared bat. Timmons Group is not aware of known maternity roost trees or
hibernacula in the vicinity of the Site. Although potentially suitable summer roosting habitat is
present, Wake County is not identified as a county in which the species is likely to occur.
Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any development of the Site may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared bat. Further, per the findings of the Final 4(d)
Rule on the northern long-eared bat, disturbance activities associated with the Site would qualify
as exempt, unintentional take.
The Raleigh Field Office Project Review steps request that reviewers assess their projects for the
potential to impact bald eagle nests. Per the NCNFlP Report, there are no occurrences of the bald
eagle or bald eagle nests at or within 1-mile of the project Site. Further, no occurrences of nests
or bald eagles were observed during the Site inspection. Therefore, any disturbance of the Site is
unlikely to disturb nesting bald eagles and no Eagle Act Permit is required
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical
habitat considered in our review and includes a species conclusions table identifying the
determinations.

For additional information, please contact Lauren Norris -Heflin at the email address listed above.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Sydni Law
Environmental Technician
Lauren Norris -Heflin
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
1) ENTIRE PROJECT REVIEW PACKAGE

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A — Self Certification Letter
Self -Certification Letter
Project Review Checklist
Species Conclusion Table
APPENDIX B — Species Reports
Official lPaC Species Report
NCNHP Species Report
APPENDIX C - Figures
Figure 1 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2 Aerial Map with Contours

APPENDIX A

ap��a,ENT OF T,y�2
o
VI r0
�QRch s, tgae
United States Department of the
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
2
Date: 18 August
Aug, 020
Self -Certification Letter
401 Assemblage
Dear Applicant:
rifsLI fN Cli FE
Interior
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
0 "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleighgfws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

S�FNT OF TN
9 A
O
�4RCH 3. 18
a�
Project Review
Checklist
Step
Item
Required
Date completed/ Notes
1 and
Official Species List from IPaC
08/06/2020 - Official IPaC List
2
(will include map showing the
Yes
requested and received
action area)
NCDENER-Heritage Program
08/06/2020 - NCNHP database
3
database results or correspon-
If Applicable
results requested and received
dence.
4
Habitat Assessments or Species
If Applicable
/0/2020 - Species habitat assessment site visit
Surveyscompleted
6
Bald Eagle Conclusion Table
Yes
08/07/2020
7
NLEB
Yes
08/07/2020
8
Species Conclusion Table
Yes
08/07/2020
Online project review request
08/07/2020
9
letter or Online project review
Yes
certification letter
10
Other documentation to support
If A licable
pp
USGS topographic 1:24,000 map, aerial map with
Environmental Inventory Map
your conclusions
contours, and attached
Instructions
Submit project review packages electronically to Raleigh@fws.
gov. Please indicate in your email subject title if you are submit-
ting a "Review Request Letter" or a "Self -Certification Letter."
All project reviews will receive a return receipt to inform you
that your project has been successfully submitted to this office.
Please note that any single email, including attachments, must
be smaller than 25 MB. If a single email would be larger than
25 MB, please spread out multiple attachments among several
emails (use the same subject name and project reference in all
emails related to an individual project). If this is not practical,
please mail a hard copy or DVD containing the project review
package to our office:
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Maintain a complete copy of the project review package
in your files since it will become an integral part of your official
record of compliance.
Contact us
If you have questions or
comments concerning this
process, please contact
Leigh Mann at (919)
856-4520 extension 10 or
via email at
[e-mail]
http://Raleigh.fws.gov
Federal Relay Service
for the deaf and hard -of -hearing
1 800/877 8339
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
http://www.fws.gov
1 800/344 WILD
January 2017

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: 401 Assemblage
Date: 08/18/2020
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Determination
Red cockaded woodpecker
No suitable habitat present
No effect
The Site is composed either of hardwood forest with few pine trees,
(Picoides borealis)
maintained pasture, or pine stands that are not of suitable size or
age.
Neuse River waterdog
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Of the proposed stream impacts, the southern -most stream is heavily
(Necturus lewisi)
impacted by cattle activities and does not constitute suitable habitat.
The northern -most forested stream did constitute potentially suitable
habitat, but there is a pond downstream with an earthen dam and no
observed outlet, preventing movement of aquatic life into the area.
Further, the species was not observed during the habitat
assessment.
Carolina madtom (Noturus
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Of the proposed stream impacts, the southern -most stream is heavily
furiosus)
impacted by cattle activities and does not constitute suitable habitat.
The northern -most forested stream did constitute potentially suitable
habitat, but there is a pond downstream with an earthen dam and no
observed outlet, preventing movement of aquatic life into the area.
Further, the species was not observed during the habitat
assessment.
Dwarf wedgemussel
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Of the proposed stream impacts, the southern -most stream is heavily
(Alasmidonta heterodon)
impacted by cattle activities and does not constitute suitable habitat.
The northern -most forested stream did constitute potentially suitable
habitat, but there is a pond downstream with an earthen dam and no
observed outlet, preventing movement of aquatic life into the area.
Further, the species was not observed during the habitat
assessment.
Yellow lance (Elliptio
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Of the proposed stream impacts, the southern -most stream is heavily
lanceolata)
impacted by cattle activities and does not constitute suitable habitat.
The northern -most forested stream did constitute potentially suitable
habitat, but there is a pond downstream with an earthen dam and no
observed outlet, preventing movement of aquatic life into the area.
Further, the species was not observed during the habitat
assessment.
Mlchaux's sumac (RhuS
No suitable habitat present
No effect
While there are disturbed areas along road rights -of -way, there is
michauxii)
significant shading from a mature canopy layer throughout the Site.
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No Eagle Act Permit
Per the NCNHP report, there are no documented bald eagle nests
leucocephalus)
bald eagles
required
within a 1-mile radius of the Site boundaries.

Northern long-eared bat
Suitable habitat present
May affect
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat and
Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -
specific section 7 responsibilities.
Critical habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Per the NCNHP database report, there is no critical habitat located
within the Site.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Signature /Title
08/17/2020
Date

APPENDIX B

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1630
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708
Project Name: 401 Assemblage
August 06, 2020
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

08/06/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

08/06/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

08/06/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/06/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1630
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708
Project Name: 401 Assemblage
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Residential development.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/35.67290242072N78.68197907096393W
Counties: Wake, NC

08/06/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

08/06/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03708 4
Clams
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Endangered
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12625
August 6, 2020
Sydni Law
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE. 401 Assemblage
Dear Sydni Law.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
401 Assemblage
August 6, 2020
NCNHDE-12625
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Ma=ed 7rea Name wner Owner Type
North American Land Trust Easement North American Land Trust Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on August 6, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
401 Assemblage
August 6, 2020
NCNHDE-12625
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name,N Last Element Accuracy Federal
Group servation Occurrence Status
a A 2 Date a Rank
Crustacean 1630 Cambarus davidi Carolina Ladle Crayfish 1997-05-24 H? 3-Medium ---
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? 5-Very ---
Damselfly Low
Reptile 35532 Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard 1980-05-18 H 4-Low ---
Vascular Plant 981 Pseudognaphalium Heller's Rabbit- 1948-10-12 H 4-Low ---
helleri Tobacco
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name IWOwner
Owner Type
City of Raleigh Open Space - Lake Wheeler
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Phillips Mitigation Site
City of Raleigh
Local Government
Wake County Easement
Wake County
Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
North American Land Trust Easement
North American Land Trust
Private
Wake County Easement
Wake County
Local Government
Town of Garner - Swift Creek Greenway
Town of Garner
Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
Town of Garner Open Space
Town of Garner
Local Government
Wake County Open Space - OS-033
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space - OS-038
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space - OS-056
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space - OS-046
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space - OS-041
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space - OS-039
Wake County
Local Government
State
Global
State
tatus
Rank
Rank
Significantly
G3
S3
Rare
Significantly
G5
S2?
Rare
Significantly
G5
S1
Rare
Significantly
G4G5T
S3
Rare
3T4
Peripheral
Page 3 of 5

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Owner Type_
Wake County Open Space -
OS-079
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space -
OS-040
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space -
OS-042
Wake County
Local Government
Wake County Open Space -
OS-080
Wake County
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.org/helr). Data query generated on August 6, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-12625: 401 Assemblage
,s
0�
1%
N
W+E
S
CJortnt, @roo
August 6, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Maror Rra9e Dr
�ryo'
Tr s26 ft
�J � fiprt 12J
V
t= .
y
I Garner
Country C lub
b' a
mto D Sforc- Home
�OtlilOq r
Ha
Seastorte St criW*leC{esll>r
v
1:28,784
0 0.25 0.5 1 mi
0 0.375 0.75 1.5 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NIL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 5 of 5

APPENDIX C

1�:7
`�T►lil'"
• 1.4 L*.*W ti 1.10111:

, \ `\ r / 1' .I X'.c•� a \ .f r,„ rz •, .. � _ ��;.r �r j .l^ J .. �-I}$;x.:
jai A.
ZN
1 `i``1 `I \ 111i./ 1 I+ // r •/''''/ '— /r 1 OF --
/ '(� �•. y,::�..'! r\�_'--' '♦ - Y c; e,. .. • ` �• %�''2-�� !./`/ �
/ / r. ,�� !• .fit / f / / , ! f .... j. �I �::.a :. i � •�� � � "� l 1 ^%a f r - / ':�r�.• .
f 1 1 0 '�r• \ \ \ / / . \ / / / ., — � ;l>14,. •�,' ie„ •' r ,''� jl�rMf/(1 t � 1 \ /'i � r /
\ `\ a�/-� •3 '/ 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 / / / i" _- %� _�./., ��.. fir_
J1, o i• 1 \ \-"-- /aI +!E.':' ar , - 9 •�= \
/ • / 1 . 1 / (� / /. ,t,• ... h
/ l �l 1 /.�\ t 1 r 1 ,'. ♦.` .;'. � ., >. �! yam. -• ,' .� t / � 1' •�i. �. ! �
r ram/ ��Y'"•♦ '\ \ l }' /r t \ t.- _� � `�,` \ `1 /� ! •� CJ — �_ 1
, /' ♦ ♦ 1 I ��/ / / •� ♦ , \ 1 \ 1 ^d> � — •�:�.4 yv.1cl��y �� � .�i �,�.��ir r! •��� � I '.�
!t 7�r /'' —_r/ � 1 • � i ! � \//' 'tea. !/'. .t ���+ ��f. f ,' �—� /_ / -
•l'..: Ali+•'. / / •
Q.
• / / .' , - � _: � _ ; . ! ' , fig; / \ =i ,, � / _ , ,'F ��_ - >,•.
pyrr ./�' i � 1 / ' � t\ = � .' _ I '... - _ ��\ l— ��_ � _ _;�°y:. • r � �.;�;.� — ,' 11 ' ,IO ! / � 'j'. ^
` — — \ / -� ''/^1`♦ —\ , �'Pr
� /r/'`, �� ,-;+ /� 1 .tom J� •.r15
Legend
•_ • es
L,\—\ � ��l,.\: `\—t"` 11 1 / tr It J\I � /L-.•.. •,'�--�_`\\\� Jf.^/' ^,r��—_ \ t\�;�I^'`,�^�� r � 1 � �\
. i � � /.... — ^ < 1 � / ` \ \ � .:. .\'rt •' iii • /- -" \� � t air ,P ` ) fi
Topographic Contours
iIvi ajorI -- `fie`. .`\ �� / .�� r• >+^ ! /' a/ -/ ra\\:f % �-iti. �Y • - �! ..
i �..i �•. _ ' ! \ is r 1
Project Limits are approximate.
' ,�. `Ad , 11 1 / �_ -- a I`` 1 — \ \ \�'"1\ \ ♦ - - .•- . • .•
Vic:: �i'�` �` �. . a r..` .:Y'•'^ :' t-_ ^ '. 1 1 ,r/-��.�♦ I. _`<i1 \ , _ 1:^11 (. n �� - __
ffi
J
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1

'�Ww rg
Ike " .r G ,
ke a le r l .r •a.. y
Perk � �', y �' _ � •�'`
i
1
O, 4 -•r it
h� 4-
Lo
TOFM4 WA.�
a .
,
c o GuIli
-
-•i
cum 49
_- Eagle, Ridge �f1
Pam im
.' G6 if C lrJ b' f *'+�
4 i rlm
ke 9enaan
'� - ..��'�}}��•4 { rY5 k T-�. 4 �{,~•+•+-ram
U� r � . `i1�+f Ian" � I144 � 's• � `�,� 5 x --
u- Mm wwm mow
``rr 1M1

Local
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
DOE Report or Local
OB1EaID
Id
Site ID
Status
Status
HD status
Site Name
Description
Notes
Internal
NR
SL
DOE
Landmark
Surveyed
NR nomination
Link
County
Quad Name
Township
Density
Location
Photo Link
Spatial Accuracy
Latitude
Longitude
Year Survey Update
y
Cnt A; CH 98-0457;
D, L.I.
WACO Rpt#540.1/
E side US 401, 0.6 mi
F..lhaber
1940sfarm
See al. WA-R158
NE of SR 10107509
118402
0
WA4811
SLDOE
None
None
Farm
mmple.
Farm/R2721
2007
2014
Wake
lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
L
Fayetteville Road*
[Report]
35.670972
-78.6910119
b759844
4255443
1947 1-dory cross
gable Minimal
Taditional
William and
—te block
Crit A and Cnt C; CH
Lillie Willis
house w/ 1951
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
W sde US 101, 1.3 mi
House and
omete block
#540.1/See al. WA
Nof SR 10106940
118403
OWA4808
SLDOE
None
None
Store
grocery store
R156/R-2721
200]
2014
Wake
Lake Wheeler
IS.ift Creek
L
Fayetteville Road*
[Report]
35.679893
-78.6868362
b7593791
4256665
Col. L. D.
Stephen..
Ho.. (Da id
and Saah
182550
Ineligible 2014; CH
Stephen..
Fedeal/Greek
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
7100 Fayetteville Rd,
120028
0WA1271
SL
None
None
No. se)
Revival 2tier
#540.1; R-2721
1991
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
L
Gamer
[Report]
35.676778
-78.6891486
b759636
4256238
https://files..,.
W sde SR 1006, 1.3
Mid 19th C. Greek
gov/nNu/nr/
Panther
mi N of SR 1010 7620
1204561
OWA1258
NR
ILL
None
Ede.wood
Revival ho-e
1993
19961
WA1258.pdf
Wake
Lake Wheeler
Bach
L
Old Stage Road Ga*
[NR.om]
35.673861
-78.6587979
b756258
4255838
US 1017414
1890-1900
Fayetteville Road
Taditio.al Form
MCC.11ers Cro-oads
131689
0WA1272
SO
INo.e
INo.e
Ho..
I.ith Cae
I
I
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
L
a.ity
35.672089
-78.6917565
b]5992]
4255596
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
]625 Fayetteville
1316901E+05
WA6308
SO
None
None
House
1920sb..galow
#540.1; R-2721
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
L
Road
[Report]
35.669187
-78.6938117
b760155
4255198
N side SR 1010, 0.4
mi W of SR 1006
Panther
9105Ten Ten Road
131691
O
WA121]
SO
None
None
Hol-t No.
c1920 bungalow
Wake
Lake Wheeler
Band,
L
Will*
35.657453
-78.67182991
b757708
4253590
W sde SR 1006, 0.7
c 1915 Colonial
Panther
mi N of SR 1010 8008
135120
0WA1256
SO
INone
INone
Hobby House
Revival
Wake
Lake Wheeler
Band,
L
Old Stage Road Wi*
35.667089
-78.6616704
-8756577
4254910
c 192011/2,tory
Off SR 10061108
stone veneer
Stone Home Road
Caft-an
Panther
Willia—C,ossoads
135121
0
WA1257
SO
None
None
House
bungalow
Wake
I Lake Wheeler
IB,and,
L
35.667605
-786532465
b755640
4254981
1900-19101-story
W sde US 101, 1.5 mi
1910461E+05
WA-R155
SO
None
None
House
Tnplel—tage
Wake
Lake Wheeler
Swift Creek
H
Sof SR 1375
[USGS]
35.683315
-78.6863057
b759320
4257134
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199808
WA6309
SO
None
None
House
#211/R-2721
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
H
7608 Fayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.670228
-78.6939596
b760172
4255341
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199809
WA6310
SO
INone
INone
Ho..
1
#212/R-2721
I
I
I
Wake
lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
H
75241ayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.67109
-78.6938517
b760160
4255459
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199810
WA6311
SO
None
None
House
#214/R-2721
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
H
7408 Fayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.672642
-78.6915474
b759903
4255671
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199811
WA6312
SO
None
None
Store
#215/R-2721
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
H
73241'ayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.673449
-78.6908347
b759824
4255782
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199812
WA6313
SO
iNone
iNone
Ho..
1
#21]/R-2]21
I
I
I
I
I
Wake
jLake Wheeler
1S.ift Creek
H
17025 Fayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.678347
-78.6864043
b759331
4256453
Ineligible 2014; CH
c 19601-story
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
brick,eneered
#540.1/Inventory
1998131
IWA6314
SO
None
None
House
fiame Ranch
#219/R-2721
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
H
6915 Fayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.68102]
-78.6856201
b759243
4256820
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199814
WA6315
SO
None
None
House
#220/R-2721
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
H
6909 Fayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.681575
78.6855131
b759232
4256896
Ineligible 2014; CH
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
#540.1 / Inventory
199884
WA6387
ISO
iNone
INone
Ho..
1
1#218/R-2721
I
1
11
Wake
Lake Wheeler
SWiff Creek
I H
7015 Fayetteville Rd
[Report]
35.678883
-]8.6860658
b759293
425652]
https://files.n,.gov/
Percy and
Ineligible 2012; CH
nNu/hismric-
MyRette
1926 flame
98-0457; WA Co Rpt
preservat on-
S sde SR 1010, 0.45
Strothe,
bungalow;
#540/See al. WA-
ffi
oce/PDFs/CH 9&
Panther
mi E of SR 27238900
234995
OWA4806
SO
None
None
No. se
o. tb.ildings
R159/R-2721
2007
0457.pdfftpage-201
Wake
Lake Wheeler
Banch
L
Ten Ten Road Gar*
[Report]
35.657666
-78.67945561
2012
b]5855]
4253619

Within western edge of existing/proposed utility
line, facing west-northwest.
Within western portion of existing/proposed utility
line, facing east toward golf course.
Within central portion of existing/proposed utility
line, facing west-southwest.
Within western portion of existing/proposed utility
line, facing east-northeast toward golf course.
Within central -western portion of existing/proposed
utility line, facing west-southwest.
.•66*0•
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.

Lauren Norris -Heflin
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 12:00 AM
To: Lauren Norris -Heflin
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Filing Meeting is not needed for 401 Assemblage - Utility Line - 20201259 Ver 2
CAUTinN• This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for 401 Assemblage -
Utility Line that you submitted on 1/13/2021 4:28 PM. The ID number for that project is 20201259, Version 2.
It has been decided that no meeting is needed for this project.
Project file link: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/Browse.aspx?dbid=0&startid=1489395
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses are not monitored.

Contact Name* Lauren Norris -Heflin
Contact Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Owner*
Various Owners - See attached property owner table
Project Name*
401 Assemblage - Utility Line
Project County*
Wake
Owner Address:*
Street Address
Hercules Real Estate Services, Inc
Address Line 2
168 Business Park Drive, Suite 200
aty
State / Province / Pegion
Virginia Beach
VA
Postal / Zip axle
Country
23462
United States
Is this a transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes c: No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Stephanie Goss
Please give a brief project description below.*
This proposed project is for the Utility Line associated with the 401
Assemblage residential project.
If the indicated dates for a meeting do not work, please contact
Lauren Norris -Heflin to schedule a different date/time.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
1 /14/2021
1 /15/2021
1 /18/2021

1 /19/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
09_Property Owner Table.pdf
416.81 KB
Figure 5
- NRCS.pdf
856.45KB
Figure 6
- WTDM - 401 utility line.pdf
3.47MB
Figure 1
- VIC.pdf
1.85MB
Figure 2
- HUC.pdf
2.55MB
Figure 3
- EIM.pdf
5.07MB
Figure 4
- Parcel.pdf
2.79MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
Submittal Date 1/13/2021