20191706 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20210210

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191706
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Line 470, Phase II-HDD
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kelsey Pace
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/10/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Little Sugar Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.109106-80.881531
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
1/11/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
51.03KB
A. Processing Information C^U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg

Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 12 - Utility Lines
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
See attached Property Information Table
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
See attached Property Information Table
Address tine 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28273
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Kelsey Pace
3b. Business Name:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3c.Address
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address tine 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28210
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Danielle Sank
4b. Business Name:
Kleinfelder, Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
9009 Perimeter Woods Dr
Address Line 2
Suite E
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28216
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization Letter_SIGNED.pdf
State / Rovince / Rion
NC
Country
United States
2f. Fax Number:
Slate / Rwince / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
Slate / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
96.96KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(i appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality I town:
Charlotte

2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See Property InformationTable
2c. Project Address
Street Address
See Property Information Table
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little Sugar Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501030102
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
3.22
State / Rovince / Pagion
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The impact areas consist of a small retention area located northeast of the intersection of South Blvd and Longleaf Drive and a small retention area located east of China Grove Church
Road. Both areas are located within urban/residential areas and are heavily impacted with nuisance species.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2019-02442
DWR# 19-1706
Project History Upload
SAW-2019-02442 PNG Duke Energy Line 470 Improvement (NWP3 Verification).pdf
19-1706 PNG Line 470.docx.pdf
17.63MB
924.68KB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig1_Line470 P2 HDD _Topo2_2.1.21.pdf 238.47KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig2_Line470 P2 HDD_Soils.pdf 325.04KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.195
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to increase capacity in order to meet customer demand in the area. The project will install appropmately 1700 linear feet of 20" diameter steel transmission
pipeline under South Blvd to a point east of China Grove Church Road via HDD in order to minimize overall impacts.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Impacts associated with this project are in order to install 20" diameter steel transmission pipeline under South boulevard, The Golden Coral property, the rail road easement owned by
the City of Charlotte, and the Sterling Paideia Elementary School property. Equipment used for HDD pipeline installation includes excavators, a drill rig and a mud motor.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Line 470 Phase II HDD-plan.pdf 556.85KB
Line-470_HDD_ImpactMaps_2021-01-18.pdf 1.16MB
Fig3_Line470 P2 HDD _WTLs_2.1.21.pdf 5.32MB
Line 470 Phase 2-CATS HDD_IFP Plans_2021-01-26.pdf 2.88MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes f No C Unknown
Comments:

5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Thomas Brumfield
Agency/Consultant Company: Kleinfelder, Inc
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes O No
7b. If yes, explain.
The remaining portion of the line located to the west of the HDD portion remains in the design phase (approAmately 28,090 linear feet in total). Mitigation for all impacts will be
calculated and provided in a separate PCN application when the final design has been approved.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
Additional wetland and stream permitting is anticipated in the remaining portion of the project.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory C^U
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands r Streams -tributaries F Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(')
2g. Impact
area*
Pipe Installation
P
Bog
W-9
Both ]0.016
(acres)
1
Pipe Installation
T
Bog
W-9
�N.
Both
0.005
(acres)
1
Pipe Installation
P
Bog
W-15
Yes
Both
0.119
(acres)
F—A
Pipe Installation
P
Bog —A
W-15
No
Both
0.056
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.005
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.196
2h. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.191
Wetland 15 in its entirety consists of 0.056 acres of emergent (PEM) wetland and 0.119 acres of forested (PFO) wetland. The total 0.175-acre
PENVPFO wetland will be impacted.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Wetland impacts were limited to low quality, disturbed areas that act as stormwater impoundment areas populated with nuisance species.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
To minimize impacts in the area, an HDD will be utilized to install the natural gas pipeline in lieu of open trenching.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent impacts for this project are limited to isolated wetlands which require no Compensatory Mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Impacts associated with this project are temporary or conversion (from forested to herbaceous) in nature and will have no impact on water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
rYes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes
r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r- No
r Unknown
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?

r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
(' Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
IPaC, NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Report
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPac.pdf 7.76MB
Element Report - Line 470 Phase Il.pdf 1.24MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Habitat assessment of streams was determined via the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries
Service Essential Fish Habitat mapper. Streams within the project boundary do not provide essential fish habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
ESI Desktop Review
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HL197132_Memo_DesktopResearch_Line470.pdf 2.42MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Floodplain Mapping Digital Maps
Miscellaneous U
Comments
This PCN covers only the HDD portion of this Phase. Cumulative impacts will be taken into account when the remainder of the proposed pipeline design has been finalized.
The cultural assessment of the initial project area identified the possibility of unmarked graves in the vicinity of the China Grove AME Zion Church. Ground penetrating radar was utilized
to identify the areas of concern and the route was adjusted to avoid impacting the area.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Property Owner Table.pdf
97.58KB
Signature C^U
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Danielle Sank
Signature
Date
2/10/2021

Agent Authorization
Form
Project: Line 470, Phase II-HDD
Property Legal Description: Multiple Properties — see enclosedmaps
Street Address: Multiple Properties — see enclosed maps
Easement Holder(please print): PiedmontNatural Gas (Duke Energy)
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Kleinfelder
To act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Easement Holder's Address (if different than property above):
4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte, NC 28820
Telephone #: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
Signature (Contactor/Agent)
Kelsey Pace Digitally signed byate: 021.2.101 Kelsey Pace
Date: 2021.02.10 16:25:27
Print Name / Title

PROPERTY OWNER
PID
DEED BOOK
PAGE NUMBER
12626 9
559
559
Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education
20511201
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
20701202
2926
161

Contact Information
Bob Sorrell
980-312-0802
[e-mail]
CMS Facility Planning & Real Estate
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
704-731-4705

E
AF
40
0 R N' t
��
40
fir*
L �
� � r + � L� • �y yy
0 200
Feet ■ � � �+�+ i � ;
Legend i ���+++rr+ ' • � --� " ...
O Project Boundary (± 3.22 Ac.) Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap, USA Topo Map.
PROJECT NO.20200350.02A Figure
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled froma� DRAWN: 1/18/2021 Topographic Map
variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. accuracy,
co makes no xL EINFEL DER
representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, DRAWN BY: LS
timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended
for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a construction Bright People. (tight Solutions. CHECKED BY: TB
design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic �_ Piedmont Natural Gas
representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.
FILE NAME: Line 470 Phase II HDD
www.kleinfelder.com See File Path Mecklenburg County, NC

10
DaB
DaB
Vl-
Dal) 1101
01
Legend
Soils: J,
= CeB2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
= CeD2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
= DaB - Davidson sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
= DaD - Davidson sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
= MO - Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
= MeB - Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap, World Imagery. Image Date: 2/1/2019.
Hydric Soil Soil Data was obtained from USDA NRCS Soils Web Soil Survey.
PROIECT NO, 20200350,02A Figure
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from DRAWN: 1/18/2021 Soils Map
variety of sources and is subject to change ithout notice. Kleirfelder makes n 1JVr_
representations or warranties, -pressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness DRAWN BY: LS
timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intende,
for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiol? grigh t People. Right 5ofo tions.
design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphi( CHECKED BY: TB Piedmont Natural Gas
representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the intormatio I FILE NAME: Line 470 Phase 11 HDD
www.kleinfelder.com I See File Path Mecklenburg County, NC

Wetland 9 1
(+ 0 AC.)
Wetland 15
(+ 0 AcC)
0 - a
N 1
06 r4
0� - - - u�• 'NYi�R - �► T.
0 0 200 400 _ : a • •" _ a _
Feet
G _
J r.
oLegend
Project Boundary (± 3.22 Ac.)
�,� -
+►' — ` - r
Delineated Wetlands
Source: Imagery
was obtained from ESRI Basemap, World Imagery. Image Date:
2/1/20 9.
z
o
PROJECT NO.20200350.02A
Figure
E
DRAWN: 2/1/2021
d
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a
Wetlands Map
DRAWN BY: LS
of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleaccuracy,
rt;presentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,
representations co makes no KL E/NFEL
timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended
OER
I'�
3
CHECKED BY: TB
d
for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a construction Bright People. Right Solutions.
design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic ��
Piedmont Natural Gas
FILE NAME:
representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.
Line 470 Phase II HDD
o
www.kleinfelder.com
See File Path
Mecklenburg County, NC
0

■ I � i
F
�IC'I

L
CRAFTERS LANE
CRESSIDA
DR
c�git� �O SlF to a o
� 4G
4
O
pgv
2�
`- G G�-
SITE A SITE B J
NITY MAP {SCALE: 1" =
1
z
c�
p
0
N�
TRACT 82
PID:20510202
JOHN ROBINSON AND- f
WIFE, RACHEL
ROBINSON o
DB 2606 PG 125 -4
m
j ^ Ili-
TRACT81PID:20510225
JOHNNIE MONTGOMERY
r AND WIFE, MARY L.
MONTGOMERY
DB 4455 PG 361
��o� �o7
�—It
LINE TABLE
LINE
BLARING
LENGTH
L547
N83°17'22"E
15.85,
L548
S13°47'03"W
32.80'
L549
S16052'20"W
21.03'
L550
S83°17'22"W
9.18,
L551
N00"59'11"E
21.08'
L552
N12°57'07"E
30.91,
L553
N12°57'07"E
6.63'
L554
S86°08'18"E
15.17'
L555
S13"47'03'W
3.69'
L556
316°52'20"W
33.23'
L557
N00°59'11"E
30.73'
RACT 80.1
120510203
3E BAILEY AND
CARRIE BAILEY
2220 PG 271
PID: 20510204
THE MARY CUTHBERTSON
TRUST, C/O MARY L.
CUTHBERTSON TRUSTEE
DB 29326 PG 619
MB 58 PG 823 LOT 1
WETLAND IMPACTS
WETLAND "9"
WETLAND "15"
PERM. IMPACT
712S.F./0.016AG.
7,601S.F./0.174AC.
TEMP. IMPACT
217 S.F.I0.005 AC.
0 S.F.10.000 AC.
it/t •,/
L55
� r �
� r
Ix
CONC.MONUMENTFOUN❑
N: 499, 788.47
E: 1,435,947.61
L554
* \/\ -j
L547_i l
\J\J,iC
h
WETLAND "9" �54*
,q v"
n/
o� �o— —o—
i
V
TRACT 83
PID:20511201
HOARD OF EDUCATION OF
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DB 1269 PG 559
DB 908 PG 184
MB 3 PG 117
STERLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
VIEW A
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
1/2" IRE
-N: 500.186.87
\ E: 1,437,113.77
41
u�
0 s\�
1 `
1 TRACT 89\
I PID:20701201
1
1 SCM CHARLOTTE REALTY, L\
1 A NORTH CAROLINA LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY \
DB 20948 PG 380
GRAVEL
r
1
—O a p, [sos '169.
(p 11 `, N83 2�2421 16 v...rCiv r gQ3o,
O 435, F
tsp�
1 ,(....../17t< /t n/. i}r /tl n vvvu
/\ivv Vt/\ri7\/Vt/tJi/,i\n/v�/\nivvvvtivl!\/Srtn! t`
rvv*v\nh/\iVl.inl,/th rthnhvtiv �/\/t/�17\/iJti r GRAVEL
.0 � 1 � F1ni V\/\71 vliVvv,itn/\n/v,rvv_t/vir vtgl}r\h11 �O O
1 Jtn<u\/v(n/\,+/tnn/vv\rtn/v rtJt/tJ,/vin<virth
G c3
/v>nrtrtn/\ ru 1vC �6C, d� PID: 20701202
ti~ JT•�{t/tr Klt C�%?n /\nnnni\f n/cnr} vS/t+t)(cvb\nr\ e..
Q in/v}nJviJcrtnnniCiY/vt \/tr\n/(n/tn/q+n/1n/V}i\!. PIEDMONT NATURAL
O ((v(i(\v ni(t�i iii(i iSili+i i iijiti(i {v(i(%iv
GAS COMPANY, INCjn/l/\/}l�l1JV1l�lr}/\ 1T,/ IV �IVv\l�7\/ni\I
Ca
r
\..._ DB 2926 PG 161
n/vt\1/IItiv\/vVr\JiJ\r ,�
x �rt/V�nrvvinn[\rtl\Jv V_\rv\/v}J'.Jt/VvtJv�/�/vvvv\ r /\' = M$ 15 PG 139
y C7 1 v�tp/c t/vv�. /tr r�nnwv itr,r\71/tn/\h \ryn\ivtrm
m� 1 u, 7tJtivt/tnr}nrWETLAND 15" v,Jl/\l i / r\nrvta'f N
N n `,I�r\I,r1/v,n/vvt r\JVV�/t/v\/\n/tJ(p
n/) v,/\/�t/�iVV1rVt/1/vV,J,(V p, 1\r 6,-\
p Z \ W /\/V\ ./v\n AAA, nn/\, rv\rvvv\n�t vvQt;, / m
Vy LP N v�nJ+rVvrtl�itrt/, r,n/yrvJvJ,/v/t/t/A/VNt Jvnnrtnnn�4
� N \/v1/,rtJ\r1n/\nr\J\n/\/\/V\l,r r /\/t/\/\/\/V1/ I1/,ryr � S
j1 ��){V u\i ryv\ v \7\/\r� vvir tnn/ nnry J\nn 69°4
0 N OHU w n(i(� 1 776
voHU�� fl ' N88109'05"E
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L600
N08°17'54"E
10.64'
L601
N01°47'11"E
13.84'
L602
N 11 "39' 14"E
6.09'
L603
N60°32'56"E
6.13'
L604
N74°37'15"E
15,08,
L605
N21°00'35"W
2.64'
L606
S63°04'05"E
12.75'
L607
S02"12'01"E
11.67'
A� aHu o a1U
a=
0NUTALWA2 iii�l�►�i��iiY��li�ti1 :?;r:��
�A���i���aYA�AtA►1t1�1�1�A10t�A�itl� �A1A�At �AYA�l.�
AY11iY�YjY�rAri�AYOAYA�OAYAYA►1YiYiYOA►��,�YAV ' � �
YaA�aAYpAYiYiY�rn � � 1� — �� .� �.. �� �i • •
t •� �....yA:__..•a�6n►�A��r�Y��Oi�iq�A���,�Y �dr �. �. i •
.� • � srw� ♦iYd ♦ s. — �
1 -0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-
-0-0-0-0-0- 0-0~0~
CHAINLINK FENCE
6'
! TRACT 88
NP�w PID:20707106
DDR CAROLINA PAVILION LP,
A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPG G G
r-G-G -- DB 27948 PG 784
G 1 MB26PG694
MB 27 PG 795
1 VIEW B
! SCALE: 1" = 30'
�- 1119111111._
PERMANENT TEMPORARY TEMPORARY PERMANENT EXEMPT SWIM
WETLAND WETLAND SWIM BUFFER SWIM BUFFER BUFFER IMPACT
IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT
STREAM WETLANDS
IMPACT
GENERAL NOTES
REBAR FOUND OL RFERON ROD FOUND OS SANITARY SEWER 1. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH JURISDICTION BOUNDARY \`\\`11111C 1I f ! /r777//� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
(i COMPUTED PAINT \ vj / SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON FnoDUKE r6111 Piedmont
SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE MANHOLE BY OPEN CUT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ��� ��� . •S'. • O� //// REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY �� ENERGY. l[y Natural Gas
2. EXISTING PIPELINE 372 WILL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO �� Q $ pN / sWVEvIfVC'+ B<cosVsuL.TiNG
ADJOINER BOUNDARY LINE INSTALLATION OF NEW LINE 470. KLE DER IN DECEMBER, 2419 AND OCTOBER, 2020.
1Z
- - • • - • • - WATER EDGE : �; Q REGIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. COPYRIGHT2018
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (FOE) SEAL _ 8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100 JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARYS OF
- SB 5B SWIM BUFFER - - /-'g'ZI GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
- - - - - - NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT - L- 46 49 = DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L-4649 NC FIRM LICENSE NO. C-1362 LINE 470 PHASE 2
- - - - - - - - - - - EX{STING EASEMENT
G-G EkSTING GAS LINE DRAWN BY:JHB LC5:115754-005003 PIPELINE REPLACEMENT -C- -o- - wE PIPELINE DB DEED BOOK �� Q�y9�p S RNE��2� �� DATE:0110512021 REVISIONS CHARLOTTE, MECKLFNBURG COUNTY
-SS-SS-SANITARY SEWER LINE MB MAPBOOK /// 7 U `'��� JOB NO.1£152.03 0111512021 NORTH CAROLINA
TREE LINE /.,,�'/p A' CLP��� SCALE:1 =30'
HDD ALIGNMENT PG PAGE 77/1I1! H I I'l l �� \ 30 15 0 30L. IR# 0228022
sHEET z2 aF 2z

TRACT 81
STERLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
TRACT 83
TRACT 85
TRACT 86
PID: 20511101
PROPERTY
PID: 20510225
JOHNNIE MONTGOMERY
PID: 20511201
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION
PID: 20510234
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NORFOLK
JAX, LLC, A NORTH CAROLINA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
(FORMERLY CHARLOTTE CORRAL, LLC)
OWNER
AND MARY L. MONTGOMERY
DB 1269 PG 559
DB 16544 PG 585
MB 40 PGS 677-709
SOUTHERN
DB 26972 PG 306 (NAME CHANGE)
DB 26972 PG 304 (MERGER)
DB 4455 PG 361
DB 908 PG 184
MB 3 PG 117
I (PG. 707 FOR THIS AREA)
DB 11803 PG 827
L
MB 33 PG 483 PART OF LOT 5A
j II 1 I
\ TRACT 86 t
�
_
- r —I
\
PID:20511101
JAX, LLC, A NORTH CAROLINA
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ' O
o �
� � �
30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT �\ � r- _ � �
_ _ _
�
- -
1 \ _ O O
\ \
m =
\
I `I
(FORMERLY CHARLOTTE I
� 1 i _
c� CORRAL, LLC)
I
- ---------------i
PROPOSED 55 LF OF 15 HDPE @ 5.4 /o
I > >
1 m I 0
\
t1
1 I `
o .I W
DB 26972 PG 306 (NAME � G
1
CHANGE)
'q
/ TRACT 82 /
I
/ f -
\
INV. IN: 644.7'
—0 U INV. OUT: 641.T - -�
/
C I
I m
I I
I I
I
DB 26972 PG 304 (MERGER)
PID: 20510202
�-
RACHEL ) J
ROBINSON / '�
�650
(/
, ti UPPER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
/ - 1
p>
z Z
�_ . n
I
I I I
I II 1
DB 11803 PG 827
w MB 33 PG 483 PART OF LOT 5A �t
I 0 I I t
I I
0
CD
0 0
CDo
o 0 0 '2� `_ o o
\
(
o o = I
{-� o. �. LD I o p
N
I�
1
I
I
j d 470-4­12-HDD-5
I I o o
- o — o
�N
PLAN
o
/ _
CV
— l�Z
M \ � \ /1 ro / 5O I- 00
�T T
--� +\ ` +� �� I� iG h� G G IG� G
C N �(
I N
11
G G� ( IG
l
/
W� �� — _
W HDD EXIT _ �
p O I
CDof
IN I I
I -
I
J
/
499942.67 =630 E=1436474.71
1' RETAINED BY
- NORFOLK
I
II
I
0 0
1 \
SOUTHERN
RAILROAD
I III
0
ir 1
p PID: 20510203
/
CD
La J C
I
( \ aQ'\ TRACT 85 I
\ \ �� U
I I
GOLDEN
CORRAL I
I II
� � BETTY BAILEY &
B-
STERLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROPOSED CLASS A
PID: 20510234
I
�
CITY OF I
I I
MARY BAILEY
/ MONTGOMERYI
I
r DB 2220 PG
1 �
TRACT 81
�� ��I_ �
J TRACT 83 RIP -RAP PAD Q \
PID:20511201 5 \ o CHARLOTTE �
/ CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG �620' �� o� DB 16544 PG 585 I
I
I
I
cn °
271 -
0 1
_
\
PI D. 20510225
WIDTH:
/ H. 3.75
LOWER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPTH: 9"
Ir-
d MB 40 PGS
OLL
I
I I °
Q
z
_ �
U
j
JOHNNIE MONTGOMERY
AND MARY L. MONTGOMERY
DB 4455 PG 361
DB 1269 PG 559 - /�
DB 908 PG 184 ��/ / /
MB 3 PG 117 / / j �� �_
/
�� 67 07 F I
(PG. 707 FOR I p
�
\X THIS AREA) ~_--
j o _
- -
I
II
I
I
—
CAT S R/W
700
700
I
690
90
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. A COMPREHENSIVE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE DETAILING
WETLAND CROSSINGS AND BORE & HDD PITS HAS BEEN
PROVIDED ON GENERAL NOTES SHEET.
680
80
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTAINING AND
PROPOSED PULLBACK STRING;
DISPOSING OF THE DRILL SLURRY.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO EROSION CONTROL
BEND RADIUS 1800'
LEGEND TO UTILIZE THE DESIGNED BEST MANAGEMENT
MAX CATENARY HEIGHT �27'
PRACTICE.
j4.
ALL AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE REQUIRE
670
70
SOIL STABILIZATION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF INITIAL
DISTURBANCE.
5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH 3:1 SLOPES OR STEEPER
o N o M
SHALL BE MATTED WITH SPECIFIED EROSION BLANKET OR
zT z+
Q
QT �
\
6. TIMBER MATTING SHOWN IS THE MIN. REQUIRED.
/
w w
CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ENTIRE WETLAND AREAS AND
66
3: U) 3: C0
CO
V60
SANITARY SEWER EXTENTS WITHIN LIMITS OF
+ O \
DISTURBANCE FOR ACCESS AND CONSTRUCTION.
wcn+ p
w� Un O
Qcn + \
��
PROFILE
65
Ui Q
50
Q�
64
—
40
0 50 100 150
SCALE: 1" = 50' HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
63
30
0 10 20 30
PROPOSED PNG 20" LINE 470 NATURAL
SCALE: 1" = 10' VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET
GAS PIPELINE INSTALLED VIA HDD
62
20
ISSUED FOR
610
610
PERMITTING
9+50
10+00
11 +00 12+00
13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+50
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
REF. DWG(S)
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY
DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSER ALL
PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
�PTM Cg9 •, Digitally
QgFE5gj0�(�Z;Y signed by
Ryan Parker
NO.
DATE
REVISIONS DESCRIPTION
'
BY
CHK
APPD
DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
PNG LINE 47 0
TRANSMISSION CATS HDD
SHEET 4
DWG SCALE AS NOTED
A
1/27/2021
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
IFP PLANS
( )
JAH
RAP
JBC
AREA CODE
XXXX
DATE
SIGNATURE/INITIALS
REGIONAL
r°2 =Date:
ENGINEER
DWG DATE 1/27/2021
STATION ID -
ACCOUNT NUMBER
492158
=,9,�•�rN€E?.�P; '
PA>�
2021.01.28
Piedmont
' DUKE MINNatural Gas
� ENERGY.,:.
CATS PULLBACK PLAN & PROFILE
NUMBER
p
0228020
DATE
SIGNATURE/INITIALS
MGR TECH
DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT
09:59:59-05'00'
REC & STD
COPYRIGHT 2018
M E C KL E N
B U RG
COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
PNG-C-470-0001085
A
DRAWING BY
JAH
DATE
SIGNATURE/ INITIALS
CHECKER
RAP
PRINCIPAL
CORP. OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
7
SIGNATURE
RC STATION/METER/LINE NUMBER YEAR REVISION
ENGINEER
CHARLOTTE, NC28210
City Resource Center Charlotte, North Carolina

PROPERTY
OWNER
STERLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
TRACT 83
PID:20511201
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION
DB 1269 PG 559
DB 908 PG 184
MB 3 PG 117
I
TRACT 85
PID: 20510234
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DB 16544 PG 585
MB 40 PIGS 677-709
G.
707 FOR THIS AREA)
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
ter. / ' \� I _0 -0 \ 1
rn
PROPOSED 55 LF OF 15" HDPE @ 5.4 /o
INV. IN: 644.7' C I I y 0 I f I I
\ INV. OUT: 641.7' 650 \ I p D m I 1,
— 1 .
HU �� '— UPPER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ��—I Z I I
CD CD CD CD L4
II
PLAN �1\I \��—iGf-� �G K; G�— G o I I
HDD - EXIT;— I O O I N
_ 640 _ELEV.=646.34'—
T — N-499942.67
ED PULLBACK STRING E=1436474.71 —630 - - _ _ \\\1 I �91' RETAINED BY
NORFOLK
0 1 I- SOUTHERN
0 I
M \� �\ 1 RAILROAD I
TRACT 85 I PROPOSED CLASS A I STERLING ELEMENTARY SCHODL PID:20510234
TRACT83 U-
I I I
t
CITY OF
RIP -RAP PAD �� Q�� _
/ CHARLOTTE �
PID:20511201 I I '
LENGTH: 5'
6 20- D� I DB 16544 PG 585 I CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG / WIDTH: 3.75'
\\
URBANCE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPTH: 9"MB 40 PIGSo, /• p \ 677-709 II 0 I
DB 1269 PG 559 / 'ILL
DB 908 PG 184 (PG. 707 FOR O
MB 3 PG 117 / / \ I THIS AREA) ~
CORROSION
PROTECTION
PIPE
MATERIAL
PROFILE
� `ORTH Cq9
Digitally
QOFEss .Z." signed by
�-'Ryan
Parker
Date:
2021.01.28
10:00:00-05'00'
G G G G G G G G G G G G
J J_ tY
ni Q Q LY
650
640
630
620
610
.••,
590
•,
570
TRACT 86
PID: 20511101
JAX, LLC, A NORTH CAROLINA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
(FORMERLY CHARLOTTE CORRAL, LLC) RIGHT-OF-WAY
DB 26972 PG 306 (NAME CHANGE)
DB 26972 PG 304 (MERGER)
DB 11803 PG 827
MB 33 PG 483 PART OF LOT 5A
TRACT 86 1
PID:20511101
JAX, LLC, A NORTH CAROLINA N
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY I O _
W (FORMERLY CHARLOTTE I 1 -A�Y..
CORRAL, LLC) Iloo
DB 26972 PG 306 (NAME o r
CHANGE)
�— DB 26972 PG 304 (MERGER) �I
DB 11803 PG 827
MB 33 PG 483 PART OF LOT 5A l
d 470-PH2-HDD-5 I
C �
o �/ o 4� 3
r / �N III 1 1 —M
-—
G G G IG
50'
l �
GOLDEN
CORRAL
J ---
G G G G
O
PID:20707106
N
DR CAROLINA
DI
PID: 20701202
PAVILION
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
DB 27948 PG 784
COMPANY, INC
MB 26 PG 694
DB 2926 PG 161
MB15PG139
MB 27 PG 795
•�\UPPER LIMITS OF
WIN
4�
-_
,1
HDD - ENTRY
�.
o c ��� + 7
N y OI-� LID
N
-0 _
IG
ELEV.=596.81'
N=499982.56
E=1437448.55
594''
I -592
L7
1 II PROPOSED q PNG 20" STEEL LINE 470 NATURAL GAS PIPELINE
G G
\ 672 674
PID:20701202
PIEDMONT
NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC
�1
DB 2926 PG 161
MB15PG139
c °°
o ON
LO
\
\
I
600
_-
59g
—
PID:20707106 /
DDR CAROLINA
PAVILION LP
a DB 27948 PG 784
MB 26 PG 694 i
\ MB 27 PG 795 C
G G G G G G
560 """�""
14+25 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00
20+00
21 +00
22+00 23+00
56
24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
NO.
DATE
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
BY
CHK
APPD
DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
�' DUKE Piedmont
� ENERGY -- Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2018
CORP. OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
PIEDMONT
CHARLOTTE, INC 28210
PNG LINE 470 TRANSMISSION CATS HDD
CATS HDD PLAN & PROFILE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
�
City Resource Center Charlotte, North Carolina
A
1/27/2021
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING (IFP) PLANS
JAH
RAP
JBC
AREA CODE
XXXX
DATE
SIGNATURE INITIALS
REGIONAL
ENGINEER
ACCOUNT NUMBER
492158
PROJECT NUMBER
0228020
DATE
SIGNATURE/ INITIALS
MGR TECH
REC &STD
DRAWING BY
JAH
CHECKER
RAP
DATE
SIGNATURE/ INITIALS
PRINCIPAL
ENGINEER
SIGNATURE
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. A COMPREHENSIVE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE DETAILING
WETLAND CROSSINGS AND BORE & HDD PITS HAS BEEN
PROVIDED ON GENERAL NOTES SHEET.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTAINING AND
DISPOSING OF THE DRILL SLURRY.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO EROSION CONTROL
LEGEND TO UTILIZE THE DESIGNED BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE.
4. ALL AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE REQUIRE
SOIL STABILIZATION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF INITIAL
DISTURBANCE.
5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH 3:1 SLOPES OR STEEPER
SHALL BE MATTED WITH SPECIFIED EROSION BLANKET OR
EQUIVALENT.
6. TIMBER MATTING SHOWN IS THE MIN. REQUIRED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ENTIRE WETLAND AREAS AND
SANITARY SEWER EXTENTS WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE FOR ACCESS AND CONSTRUCTION.
0 50 100 150
SCALE: 1" = 50' HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 30
SCALE: 1" = 10' VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET
ISSUED FOR
PERMITTING
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET 5 DWG SCALE AS NOTED
DWG DATE 1/27/2021 STATION ID -
DRAWING NUMBER
PNG-C-470-0001086 A
RC STATION/METER/LINE NUMBER YEAR REVISION

1/14/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. am\,tA4
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction
in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location A r
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
10
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 1/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
1@ [phone]
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 2/14

1/14/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.-;O%
4 %
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly. 0
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project. .0\
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. A#-
-11 00
Listed speciesL and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 3/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
There is final critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534
STATUS
Threatened
AR
STATUS
CVEnngered
Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii rd
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
,,V44*,
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered
.zo�
�t�J
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 4/14

1/14/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acts and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
IkL'k
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 5/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list
and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee
that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public
have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the
relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic
Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your
migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA BREEDING
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
.........................................................................................................................................
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN THE
.............................................................................................................................
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A VERY
LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
,('
Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
.......................................................................................................................
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE"
............................................................................................................................
INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT
..........................................................................................................................
LIKELY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
11116 1%
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 6/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
1 4
Breeds elsewhere 10
0< t>, �
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project
area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please
make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( ) IVA%
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have
higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 7/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is
the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.\0
i,
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data(
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season . survey effort no data
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 8/14

1/14/2020
_2111111111mr-
SPECIES
JAN FEB
MAR
APR
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable This
is not a Bird of
'.............................E�fl�ervation Concern
...... '' ' " (BCC) Rsarea but ....................................................
warrants attention because
0. f.��el�ile"Act­or­for ................
.................. ......................
otential sYsmtibilities in.............
offshore areas from certain
...................................................................
types of development or
............................................
........... activities.).
Blue -winged Warbler
BCC - BCR (This is a Bird of
.............................................................
nervation Concern
... ..........................................
;;.': ... ....................... (BCC) only particular Bird
................... ............................................
... Conservation Regions
(BCRs)­iiin­the continentali'
'U�Ki ................................................
............
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
..................................................................
is a Bird of Conservation
............................................................
...... Concern(BCC)throughout
....................................................
its range in the continental
. . . .........................
... .. ... .. ..
USA a'na'W1as'k'a'.')
.........................................
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
........ ..........................................................
is a Bird of Conservation
........ ............................................ 'Concern(BCC)throughout ......
....................................................
its range in the continental
. .........................
... .. ... .. ..
. .
USA a'na'W1as'k'a'.')
.........................................
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
..................................................................
is a Bird of Conservation
...........................................................
...... Concern(BCC)throughout
....................................................
its range in the continental
. .. .........................
... .. ....
. .
1111141li
USA a'na'W1as'k'a'.')
a
Rusty Blackbird [phone]+1 14 11
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
..................................................................
is a Bird of Conservation
............................................................
...... !Concern (BCC) throughout
................................................... its range in the continental
... .. ... .. .. U . S . A ..aind"Xiask'a'.') .........................
........................................
j
IPaC: Explore Location
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
I I - I I I I 1 1 -4-++ +++— -4-++-4- -4-4-++ +Tj I IIII
q.q
T777 +++4-
++-4-+ +++-4- +++4-
mmmm mmmm
I+1 ---1++ ++IN +-'--IN
III I 1 1 -4- —+++ +++-1-- 4- + + 4- 4--4-+1 +111 11-4-1
hftps://ecos.fws.gov/ipactiocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 9/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern(BCC)throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
+++ ++++ +1*0 I11,-
+1++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
'
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in m specified location?
g g Y p Y g Y p
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location. *0- �
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
�� 16
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 10/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore
energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects A.
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 11/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence"
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
01C
National Wildlife Refuge lands %\
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
ow 0< XV 1100011
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 12/14

1 /14/2020
IPaC: Explore Location
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
PF01 C
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
RIVERINE
R2UBH
R4SBC
R5UBH
01C
-MA NN
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in
polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
,'
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 13/14

1 /14/2020
Data exclusions
IPaC: Explore Location
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. -14
GOB
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipactlocation/5DEAT46EAND67ONDNCCJ7UGLG4/resources 14/14

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-11090
January 14, 2020
Chris Kul
Kleinfelder
8933 Western Way Suite 12
Jacksonville, FL 32256
RE. Line 470 - Phase 2; 20200350.002A
Dear Chris Kul:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Line 470 - Phase 2
Project No. 20200350.002A
January 14, 2020
NCNHDE-11090
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name lement Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group VObservation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
j � Date Rank
Freshwater 13485 Lasmigona decorata Carolina Heelsplitter 1918-Pre X 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1 S1
Bivalve
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name
er Type
Coffey Creek Greenway Mecklenburg County Local Government
Ramblewood Soccer Complex Mecklenburg County Local Government
Kings Branch Greenway Mecklenburg County Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/heir). Data query generated on January 14, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Line 470 - Phase 2
Project No. 20200350.002A
January 14, 2020
NCNHDE-11090
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Group
Observation
Date
Freshwater 13485
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
1918-Pre
Bivalve
Vascular Plant 4103
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-
1994-05-31
trefoil
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Little Sugar Creek Greenway
Mecklenburg County
Little Sugar Creek Greenway
Mecklenburg County
Coffey Creek Greenway
Mecklenburg County
Ramblewood Soccer Complex
Mecklenburg County
Kings Branch Greenway
Mecklenburg County
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
Catawba Lands Conservancy - Whitehall Nature
Catawba Lands Conservancy
Preserve
Pine Valley Park
Mecklenburg County
Element Accuracy Federal State
Occurrence Status Status
Rank IIL III
X 3-Medium Endangered Endangered
A? 3-Medium --- Special
Concern
Vulnerable
Hi? 5-Very --- Endangered
Low
aner Type M
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
Private
Local Government
Global State
Rank Rank
G1 S1
G5T3 S3
G3 S2
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/heir). Data query generated on January 14, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-11090: Line 470 - Phase 2
Kenned
1j ..1 hliddleY _
o
h Fry
>k O`
-
Raddell z
ry"a
�1O eV
o �
iq �
Sce t�eW
Y'.4n
Hgh
P2`so
�Rn
i3
•_ �
� A,ca=eVc
-.
Ra
°a
x pie
Park Roatl
a
„I,
n'
0
Comm un iy
Park
a� tlHiCko Nv
Pe
c�rhG�
Whilaleu
Commons �-
O
� ?
o
i Or
^'
-
L
x
ctlhtl
QO
V—
lion
can
f:d9e10,,,
C
P
'y
k�
aac'
tore4
®
h Oaks P-K Sea.-K
C 3
�.
n.Yrspy
tlRd
Sta•orock 0,.
ri
_
sq-
is. 61.'
J
cp
York
Croesin7
wlc \\
Y N
4
_
PG leek
Jib il', LGa
C/
.. ,5�,
G`o ky
_
Orr.
P 77,
r__
Rork d9 a
r
♦
b�
�Mns'. ri
�, ,
�19/
Rdya
tz�ornera
—y' S
in Lco
��
?
of `
Quail
Hollow
hkddla
O
toll
Cl.
3 �
�
E WeslpSjlp use 6h'tl e�
�
� a srn,rhr ,,,
GGala'wpa7rCe
�21`
�\ S n.
a\
C Ina
klen to r9
High'48rFfia
�,e
p
�
6:p�
/
�Dr
\a�
p Camwinda
o N' �r
f
�i
Glen
w . -P��
0 � ��\G'
\ McCuIla4Dh
Tao
wrrdgtO
January 14, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Q Managed Area (MAREA)
1:44, 007
0 0.375 0.75 1.5 mi
0 0.5 1 2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 4 of 4

I1%C�uL�
TO: Chris Kul
Kleinfelder
8933 Western Way, Suite 12
Jacksonville, FL 32256
FROM: Terri Russ, Department Manager —Archaeology
DATE: 11 November 2019
RE: Line 470
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Cultural Resources Research
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
A lferracon COMPANY
Research conducted by Environmental Services, Inc., A Terracon Company (ESI) at the North
Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on 5 November 2019 and 8 November 2019 revealed
that several previously recorded archaeological sites are located within or adjacent to the
proposed project area and are summarized below.
Research conducted by ESI using the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
HPOWEB GIS service database on 5 November 2019 revealed no previously recorded historic
properties located directly within the proposed project area. Examination of reports on file at the
OSA indicated that the China Grove AME Zion Church Cemetery (SHPO No. MK3340), located
to the north of the proposed pipeline, appears to have marked and unmarked graves that extend
into the proposed corridor and is discussed below.
Site 31 MK132 was recorded by Fred Fischer in 1980 as a scatter of quartz lithic material, possibly
associated with a prehistoric quarry. The site was recorded during a survey for the Coffey Creek
Wastewater Outfall project and was described as a potentially significant site recommended for
further testing. Although the proposed pipeline does not intersect this area, the site is located in
an area designated as temporary workspace. It is recommended that no subsurface disturbance
occur in this area. If subsurface disturbance in this area is unavoidable, additional archaeological
investigations should be undertaken to assess the portion of this archaeological site located within
the proposed area of disturbance.
Site 31 MK133 was recorded by Fischer in 1980 during an archaeological survey for the proposed
Ramblewood District Park. The site consisted of a scatter of Early Woodland and non -diagnostic
lithic cultural material recorded on the exposed ground surface. The site was recommended Not
Eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) by the recorder and does
not appear to intersect with the project corridor. No additional work at this location is
recommended.
Raleigh, North Carolina

ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Memo A lferracon COMPANY
Site 31MK134 was also recorded by Fischer in 1980 during an archaeological survey for the
proposed Ramblewood District Park. This site consisted of a scatter of Late Woodland or
Mississippian period cultural material project and was recommended Not Eligible by the recorder.
The mapped location of this site does not appear to intersect with the project corridor. No
additional work at this location is recommended.
Site 31MK136, recorded by Fischer in 1980 during the Ramblewood District Park archaeological
survey, was a scatter of lithic material recorded from the exposed ground surface. Fischer
recommended the site Not Eligible. The mapped location of this site does not appear to intersect
with the project corridor. No additional work at this location is recommended.
Site 31MK271 was also recorded by Fischer in 1980 during the Ramblewood District Park
archaeological survey. This site appears to be an Early Archaic and Early Woodland site.
According to the site form, most of the site was destroyed by sewer construction and an adjacent
borrow pit. The recorder indicated that the site was Not Eligible for the National Register; however,
the OSA considers the site as "Unassessed". The mapped location of the site indicates that it is
immediately adjacent to the proposed pipeline route and permanent easement. Although it may
be located outside of the proposed area of disturbance, it is recommended that this site be
relocated and assessed, if possible, prior to any ground disturbance associated with the current
project.
31MK1068 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located immediately north of the proposed pipeline
within an historic cemetery. The prehistoric artifact scatter was determined Not Eligible for the
National Register. Although no additional work at this location is recommended with regards to
the prehistoric site, there is a cemetery in this location associated with the China Grove AME Zion
Church, discussed below.
The China Grove AME Zion Church Cemetery (SHPO No. MK3340) contains graves dating
from c. 1867. The cemetery was investigated in 2002 during a study for the then -proposed South
Corridor Light Rail Project. The study determined that unmarked graves associated with the
cemetery were likely located in the wooded area to the south of the marked cemetery. The report's
sketch map of the unmarked graves could not be georeferenced; however, given the location of
the pipeline, it is possible that there are unmarked graves in the vicinity. It is recommended that
this area be avoided, if possible, by rerouting the line to the south or north.
In summary, of the seven previously recorded cultural resources located within or adjacent to the
proposed project corridor, three appear to be located within the proposed area of disturbance.
Site 31 MK132 (a prehistoric lithic quarry site) was recommended as "potentially eligible";
subsurface disturbance to this area should be avoided, if possible. Site 31 MK271, a prehistoric
site, is considered unassessed by the OSA. If avoidance to this site is not possible, it is
Raleigh, North Carolina

ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Memo A lferracon COMPANY
recommended that field investigations be conducted to determine the site boundaries and assess
the site's National Register eligibility. The China Grove AME Zion Church Cemetery (MK3340)
appears to have marked and unmarked graves located within the proposed pipeline route. It is
recommended that subsurface disturbance to this area be avoided.
Table A: Summary of Cultural Resources Within or Adjacent to Project Corridor
Within
Site #
Type
NRHP Eligibility
Project
Recommendations
Comments
Corridor
Within temporary
31 MK132
Prehistoric
Potentially Eligible
Yes
Avoidance
workspace
31 MK133
Prehistoric
Not Eligible
No
No Further Work
Outside of project corridor
31 MK134
Prehistoric
Not Eligible
No
No Further Work
Outside of project corridor
31 MK136
Prehistoric
Not Eligible
No
No Further Work
Outside of project corridor
Not Eligible/
Avoid or Relocate
31 MK271
Prehistoric
Yes
Within pipeline route
Unassessed
and Assess
31 MK1068
Prehistoric
Not Eligible
No
No Further Work
Outside of project corridor
Unmarked graves recorded
MK3340
Cemetery
Unassessed
Yes
Avoidance
within pipeline route
In the event that federal funding or permitting for this project is anticipated, formal coordination
with SHPO should be undertaken to determine if any archaeological investigations or historic
structure surveys will be required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA 1966, as amended). Section 106 requires that the effect of a project on significant cultural
resources be taken into account on all projects involving federal funding and/or permitting. The
guidelines for fulfilling the provisions of Section 106 are contained in the implementing regulations
36 CFR 800.
Sincerely,
Environmental Services, Inc.
Terri Russ, RPA
Archaeology Department Manager
Raleigh, North Carolina

d
jr
32
gift jp
/ 1
' A
`al MK136Ap, 4P4
IIIIK2�7�1 / 3� rfi.
40
Ip
'`•�j : .
MK1068
Cemetery.{ prox)
Environmental ■ Facilities • Geotechnical ■ Materials

Contact Name*
Thomas Brumfield
Contact Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Owner*
Piedmont Natural Gas
Project Name*
Line 470 Phase II HDD
Project County*
Mecklenburg
Owner Address:*
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address Line 2
aty
Charlotte
Postal / Zip axle
28210
Is this a transportation project?*
(- Yes c: No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
(- Yes c: No
State / Province / Pegion
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below.*
The purpose of the project is to HDD under South Boulevard and the
Rail Line located on City of Charlotte property in order to install a
portion of 16" diameter steel transmission pipeline for the purpose of
transporting natural gas.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
1 /20/2021
1 /19/2021
1 /26/2021
1 /27/2021

Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Fig 3. Topographic Map.pdf 1.59MB
185203 Line-470 Phase-2 HDD
1.74MB
ImpactMaps_2021-01-05.pdf
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
A
Submittal Date 1/11/2021