20180182 Ver 1_Final AsBuilt Monitoring Report_20200918

Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
ECOSYSTEM 1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27511
PLANNING &
EPR RESTORATION Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
Mr. Steve Kichefski
151 Patton Ave, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
September 11, 2020
RE: Final As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Surry County, North Carolina
SAW-2017-01927
Dear Mr. Kichefski,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC (EPR) has prepared the Final Red Barn Mitigation Bank
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report for your review based on comments and suggestions made
during the on-site field meeting on June 10th, 2020. The following edits have been made to the
Baseline Monitoring report:
• Two (2) photo points were added to the photo log and will be taken from the same location
annually. These photos show the pedestrian crossing located on UT2c (Photo point 31) and
the ATV crossing located on UT3c (Photo point 32).
• As noted in the draft report, EPR is in the process of releasing three areas from the
recorded conservation easement. These areas include a pedestrian crossing over UT2c
where a pedestrian bridge will be installed; a riffle crossing connecting the properties on
either side of UT3c; and an area along the property line of UT1a where leaving an existing
fence will help protect the easement against encroachment. These easement corners have
been marked and the paperwork to release them has begun. EPR will submit a draft release
to USACE to review before releasing these areas from the conservation easement.
• The bamboo area near upstream UT1 is called out on the CCPV and will be treated in
winter 2020.
• Fencing and a gate near the UT3 culvert were mistakenly installed within the conservation
easement and have been moved to their correct locations (see Sheet 15 in As-built Plan
Sheets).
• The UT3 culvert was installed in the incorrect location and the roadway crossing alignment
was incorrect. This has been fixed (see Sheet 15 in As-built Plan Sheets).
• The surveyed channel top of bank feature in the As-built Plans did not match with observed
site conditions (documented in site cross sections) in a few locations.These areas have
been re-surveyed and have been updated in the As-built Plans. The missing structures that
were noted in the Draft submittal have also been surveyed and added to the plans.
-----"--✓ Providing ecosystem planning and restoration services to support a sustainable environment,-.....''^

Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
ECOSYSTEM 1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27511
PLANNING &
EPR RESTORATION Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
• Saplings on the site were planted in March 2020 according to the planting plan, and no
species substitutions were made.
As discussed during the site meeting and in the Draft As-built Baseline Monitoring Report, multiple
alterations were made during construction that have impacted the number of credits produced by
the Site. The updated mitigation assets provided by the Site are shown in Table A below and in
Table 1 of the Final As-built Baseline Monitoring Report. These values are unchanged from the
Draft submittal of this document.
Table A.As-built Credit Summary
Value Value from MBI (Approved As built Value
Nov 2019)
SCs 8,069 8,032
WCs 2.72 2.02
Conservation
Easement(AC) 25.4 25.3
The official credit ledger has been updated and the number of stream and wetland credits
generated by the Site will be reflected in the second credit release request.
In response to a few other items noted in the meeting minutes from the on-site field meeting on
June 10th, 2020:
• Stream gauge 2 shown on CCPV Figure 2B and Sheet 7 of the plan set is located in UT1c,
downstream of the culvert; therefore, we do not believe there is a need to install an
additional gauge along this reach to document flow.
• Easement markings and crossing signs have all been installed.
• The pedestrian bridge has not been installed yet but is scheduled for installation in September
2020.
If you have any questions regarding the Final As-built Baseline Monitoring Report, please contact me
at 919-999-0262 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely, Kevin Tweedy, PE
Providing ecosystem planning and restoration services to support a sustainable environment

As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
FINAL
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Monitoring Year 0
Data Collection Period: Submission Date:
March 2020— May 2020 September 2020
ue-,
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01927
Prepared For: Prepared By:
0US Army Corps of Engineers Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
Wilmington District 1150 SE Maynard Road,Suite 140
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Cary, NC 27511
rE PR
Asheville, NC 28801

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 1
1.1 Goals and Objectives 2
1.2 Mitigation Components 3
1.3 Construction 4
1.3.1 In-Stream Work and Floodplain Grading 4
1.4 Site Planting 4
2.0 BASELINE DATA ASSESSMENT 5
2.1 Performance Criteria 5
2.2 Stream Monitoring 6
2.2.1 Stream Profile 7
2.2.2 Stream Dimension 7
2.2.3 Channel Stability 8
2.2.4 Stream Hydrology 8
2.3 Riparian Vegetation 9
2.3.1 Baseline Vegetation Monitoring 9
2.4 Wetland Hydrology 9
3.0 REFERENCES 12
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
rPR Surry County,North Carolina

TORT Fc
Table A. As-built Credit Summary
Table B. USACE Mitigation Success Criteria
Table C. Stream Monitoring Summary
Table D. Riparian Vegetation Monitoring Summary
Table E. Wetland Monitoring Summary
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Project Information Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Project Location Map
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Figure 3. Riparian Buffer Zones
Baseline Photo Log
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Vegetation Planting Information
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 7. Stem Count by Plot
Vegetation Photo Log
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table 10. Monitoring Data —Stream Reach Data
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Cross Section Plots
Appendix E: As-built Plan Sheets
As-built Plan Sheets
Conservation Easement Recorded Plat
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
r
PR Surry County,North Carolina

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC (EPR) implemented the Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Site (Project; Site) to provide cool temperature stream credits (SCs) and riparian wetland credits
(WCs) in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101. Multiple
alterations were made during construction that impact the credits produced by the Site.
Changes to the number of credits from the Mitigation Plan (Final version submitted November
2019) are summarized in Table A and further explanation is provided in this report. The Project
restored and enhanced 7,586 linear feet (LF) of three perennial unnamed tributaries (UT) to
Stewarts Creek, and one intermittent deep gully. The three main perennial tributaries are
referred to as "UT1", "UT2", and "UT3", while the intermittent gully is referred to as "UT4." The
Project also created and rehabilitated 3.67 acres of wetland hydrology by raising and
reconnecting the restored stream beds to an active floodplain to restore a stream-wetland
complex within the 25.3-acre conservation easement. Mitigation assets are listed in Table 1 of
Appendix A.
Table A.As-built Credit Summary
Value Value from MBI (Approved As built Value
Nov 2019)
SCs 8,069 8,032
WCs 2.72 2.02
Conservation
Easement(AC) 25.4 25.3
The Site is located in DMS targeted local watershed 03040101100010. The Site was historically
utilized for agricultural and cattle practices. As such, wetlands and streams in the project area
were adversely impacted by direct cattle access, farming activities, and stream channelization.
The Site is in a rural but developing area of Surry County. Land use within the UT1 and UT2
watersheds is comprised of 37.3% pasture lands, 27.4% deciduous forest lands, and 35.3%
residential development. Land use within the UT3 watershed is comprised of 49.2% cultivated
crops and hay, 30.5%forest land, and 20.2% urban land with 2.3% of the urban land being
impervious. Prior to construction activities, all four project streams have either sustained
significant cattle damage and/or have been channelized to maximize agricultural activities. The
adjacent wetlands were drained by channelization of the project streams, and in the case of WA
and WB, were also trampled, heavily grazed, and drained by multiple ditches. Pre-construction,
or pre-existing, site conditions are provided in Table 4 of Appendix A and the Baseline Stream
Data Summary Tables in Appendix D. Photos and a more detailed description of Site conditions
before restoration are available in the Mitigation Plan (Final version submitted November
2019).
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPP Surry County, North Carolina

Site construction was completed in March 2020 and the as-built survey was completed in May
2020. On April 12th, 2020 a large flood event caused hillslope rilling and some minor damage to
in-stream structures and some repair work was completed in April 2020. Planting occurred in
March and April 2020 and baseline vegetation data collection occurred in May 2020. A detailed
timeline of the Project activity and reporting history are provided in Table 2 of Appendix A.
During construction:
• Bedrock was encountered in the proposed channel alignment on UT2b between 28+50
and 28+90, the pattern was adjusted adding 11.9 LF to the centerline length.
• A rock step structure was added at the upstream end of UT4 to stabilize the headcut.
• Additionally, the number of log structures throughout the Site was reduced to account
for the amount of wood available onsite; in some cases, wood structures were replaced
with constructed riffle structures to provide grade control.
All changes from the design are detailed below in Section 1.3.1. Baseline (MYO) profiles and
cross-section dimensions closely match the design parameters with notable variations
described below. Overall, the Site was built as designed and is expected to meet the upcoming
monitoring year's success criteria.
1.1 Goals and Objectives
The Project goals were established based on an assessment of site conditions and restoration
potential with careful consideration of the stressors identified in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report (NCEEP, 2009) and the NCDWQ Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin Plan Summary (2008). As such, the established project goals include:
1) Reduce sediment inputs and stream turbidity;
2) Reduce nutrient inputs;
3) Reduce fecal coliform inputs;
4) Restore/enhance degraded riparian buffers;
5) Reduce urban/suburban stormwater runoff;
6) Reduce stream channel and stream bank instability;
7) Improve aquatic habitat; and
8) Improve wetland function.
The proposed streams were broken into eleven reaches for design purposes. UT1 consists of
three reaches, UT2 consists of three reaches, UT3 consists of four reaches and UT4 is one reach.
The design criteria were based on surveys of multiple reference reaches, published reference
reach data, and on design criteria and monitoring data from past successful restoration projects
performed throughout the Piedmont region of North Carolina. Restoration practices involved
raising the streambeds of the project streams and restoring them back to their historic
locations along the fall of the valley, thereby restoring historic flow dynamics and a healthy
headwater stream-wetland complex. Buffers in excess of 30 feet were established along most
reaches.
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 2
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPP Surry County, North Carolina

Functional uplift will come from restoring natural riparian and wetland vegetation, excluding
livestock from all project streams, and restoring the project streams to a stable condition,
connected to their adjacent floodplain wetlands. The Project has restored the plan form and
bed form diversity to conditions similar to reference channels (Appendix D, Table 8). Functional
uplift was achieved by incorporating woody structures throughout the Site and by planting a
forested buffer that will serve as a source of large woody debris in the future. Additionally,
lateral stability was improved in the short term by removing the cattle and reducing shear
stresses in the channel. As the riparian buffer continues to establish, lateral stability should
improve further and increase the resiliency of the restored channels.
1.2 Mitigation Components
The current condition plan view (CCPV) in Appendix B (Figure 2) shows the mitigation assets
along with the location of monitoring features. Post-construction conditions (Appendix A, Table
1) at the Site generated 8,032 SCs and 2.02 WCs as a result of the following:
• 3,840 linear feet of Priority 1 stream restoration
• 3,089 linear feet of Priority 2 stream restoration
• 560 linear feet of Enhancement I
• 97 linear feet of Enhancement II
• 12.1 acres of riparian buffers outside of the required 30-foot stream buffers were
protected and planted within the conservation easement.
• 2.4 acres of wetland rehabilitation
• 1.3 acres of wetland creation
As illustrated in the As-built Plan Sheets in Appendix E, the plan form of the proposed streams
did deviate slightly from the proposed design (UT2b and UT4, refer to Section 1.3.1) and the
stream lengths have been revised accordingly from the approved mitigation plan.
Additionally, due to these pattern changes and the planned release of some areas from the
recorded conservation easement, the buffer method was revised to reflect as-built conditions
and a revised table and figure are provided in Appendix B.
Additional construction activities performed at the Site included the following:
• Planting approximately 19,000 stems within the easement,
• Chemical treatment of exotic vegetation,
• Installing large woody debris within wetland areas,
• Fencing of the conservation easement with multiple gates and crossings to keep cows
out, and
• Installing a well, multiple cattle waterers, and water lines to support these facilities.
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 3
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
Surry County, North Carolina

Construction
Construction began in November 2019 and site earthwork was completed in April 2020. Table 3
in Appendix A outlines the Project contacts. Deviations from the design are shown in the As-
built Plan Sheets (Appendix E) and are described in detail within this section.
1.3.1 In-Stream Work and Floodplain Grading
The As-built Plan Sheets (Appendix E) provide a visual markup of the design to show what was
installed during construction. The Site is expected to meet the upcoming monitoring year's
success criteria.
During and post construction, the Site experienced multiple large flow events with no
significant lateral and vertical adjustment.
The number of log structures throughout the Site was reduced to account for the amount of
wood available onsite; in some cases, wood structures were replaced with constructed riffle
structures to provide grade control. At the completion of construction, the following structures
were installed across the project streams:
• 18 Log Vanes
• 31 Log Steps
• 55 Log Rollers
• Approximately 290 LF of Woody Riffle
• Approximately 1,980 LF of Constructed Riffle
• Approximately 2,060 LF of Toe Wood
• A rock step structure was added to stabilize the headcut at the upstream extend of UT4.
This structure ends at station 10+04, and adjusts the creditable length of that stream by
4 LF.
As shown in the As-built Plan Sheets in Appendix E, the centerline pattern was built roughly to
the planned alignment, with one notable exception. UT2b proposed alignment encountered
bedrock downstream of the culvert and the channel was re-aligned, adding 11.9 LF of length to
the centerline.
Lastly, field adjustments were made to the profile and structures in some minor, localized areas
where it became obvious during construction that the channel dimensions and stability may be
compromised without some slight modifications.
Site Plantinc
Live stakes were planted starting in February for any completed sections and were planted as
reaches were completed through March 2020. Saplings on the site were planted in March 2020
according to the planting plan, and no species substitutions were made. In order to address
concerns about herbaceous vegetation growth in low gradient reaches, EPR altered the planting
- Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 4
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPRSurry County, North Carolina

plan to add 1-gallon sycamores along the streambanks of low gradient reaches to provide shade
and limit herbaceous growth within the monitoring period. These plants were installed in April
2020.
EPR installed an additional 90 trees and shrubs (1-gallon and 3-gallon) in areas with standing
water and saturated soil conditions northeast of the confluence of UT1c and UT2a. These
larger species were established to provide greater vegetative cover in areas that receive large
water inputs from the surrounding hillsides. Species planted within these areas included
swamp chestnut oak, willow oak, sycamore, elderberry, buttonbush, silky dogwood, and river
birch. These plants were installed at the end of April 2020.
2.0 BASELINE DATA ASSESSMENT
This report establishes the baseline data that will be used to determine the success of the Red
Barn Mitigation Bank Site. The performance criteria and as-built site conditions are described in
the following sections to evaluate whether the project is meeting the success criteria in
subsequent monitoring years.
2.1 Performance Criteria
Project success criteria were established in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—
Wilmington District Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of Guidance for Compensatory
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District (October 24, 2016). The
monitoring plan for the site will follow this guidance. Table B details the USACE success criteria
that evaluate whether project goals have been met throughout the monitoring period.
Table B. USACE Mitigation Success Criteria
Restored Stream Channels
• All streams must maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark(OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
• Continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days.
• Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 for all measured cross sections on a given reach.
• Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be above 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach
(for C and E streams).
• BHR and ER should not change by more than 10%in any given year for all measured cross sections
on a given reach.
• Must document occurrence of at least 4 bankfull events in separate years during the monitoring
period.
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 5
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EP Surry County, North Carolina

Riparian Vegetation
• Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3;
a minimum of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 4; and a minimum of 210 stems per
acre must be present at year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting
list for the site.
• Any single species can only account for 50%of the required stems per monitoring plot.
Wetland Monitoring
• All wetland areas must maintain a hydroperiod of 10% of the growing season, as defined from
April 8 to October 26 (USDA 2007)
• Wetland creation areas must document the development of hydric soil indicators.
• Within planted portions of the Site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3;
a minimum of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per
acre must be present at year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting
list for the Site.
• Any single species can only account for 50%of the required stems per monitoring plot.
• Vegetation must be planted, and plots established, at least 180 days prior to the initiation of the
first year of monitoring.
• Permanent plots will be randomly located throughout the Site, and random plots will not make
up more than 50%of the plots.
2.2 Stream Monitoring
Stream monitoring will include monitoring of the hydrologic and geomorphic functions of UT1,
UT2, UT3 and UT4. Monitored parameters, methods, schedule/frequency, and extent are
summarized in Table C. These monitoring parameters follow USACE guidance but will also allow
for monitoring of other parameters to document site performance related to the project goals
listed in Section 1.1. The locations of the established monitoring cross sections are shown in
Figure 2 (Appendix B).
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 6
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPP Surry County, North Carolina

Table C. Stream Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent
Stream Profile Full longitudinal survey As built only(unless All four stream channels
otherwise required)
5 cross sections on UT1
Stream Dimension Cross sections Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 6 cross sections on UT2
6 cross sections on UT3
1 cross section on UT4
Photo Points Yearly 32 photo points
Visual Assessment Yearly All four stream channels
Channel Stability Only if instability is
Additional Cross sections Yearly documented during
monitoring
1 each on UT1a, UT1c,
Pressure transducers Continuous recording UT2a, UT2c, UT3a, UT3c,
through monitoring
Stream Hydrology Precipitation recorder period and UT4; and 1 Tipping
Bucket
Photos of flood indicators Yearly All four stream channels
2.2.1 Stream Profile
A full longitudinal profile was surveyed in May 2020 for the entire length of the restored stream
to document as-built conditions. This survey is tied to a permanent benchmark and includes
thalweg, water surface, right bank and left bank features. Profile measurements were taken at
the head of features (e.g. riffle, pool) and at the max depth of pools.
The surveyed longitudinal profile shows that the constructed bedform features are mostly
consistent with the reference and design criteria. Table 8 in Appendix D summarizes the
measured profile data. UT1a, UT1c, UT2a, and UT4 each have pools that have filled in but are
expected to flush out as riparian vegetation establishes. The longitudinal profile will not be
surveyed in subsequent years unless vertical channel instability has been observed during
monitoring and remedial actions or repairs are needed.
2.2.2 Stream Dimension
Eighteen permanent cross sections were installed across the site; five on UT1, six on UT2, six on
UT3 and one on UT4. Nine cross sections were installed in riffles and nine were installed in
pools. Final cross-section locations did not vary significantly from the locations suggested in the
mitigation plan. Each cross-section was marked using a length of rebar and T-posts on both
streambanks. The location and elevation of each pin was recorded to facilitate data comparison
from year to year. Cross-sections will be surveyed in Monitoring Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 and
reported data will include measurements of Bank Height Ratio (BHR) and Entrenchment Ratio
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 7
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPP Surry County, North Carolina

(ER). Reference photos will be taken of both streambanks every year to provide a visual
assessment of any changes that may occur.
The surveyed cross-sections indicate that the as-built stream dimensions are consistent with
the reference and design criteria. The cross-section plots, photos, and data summary (Tables 8
and 9) are included in Appendix D. As shown in Appendix D, the bankfull area was a little lower
and the width-to-depth ratios a little higher than the design criteria in some riffles. These two
tables will be updated in subsequent monitoring years to facilitate comparison between
monitoring years. There should be little change in the channel dimension data over the
monitoring period, but if changes do take place they will be documented and evaluated to
determine if they indicate a shift toward stability (potentially represented by settling,
vegetative changes, or deposition on top of stream banks) or instability (represented by erosion
and down-cutting). Any unstable areas will be assessed to determine whether they are systemic
and whether repairs are needed.
2.2.3 Channel Stability
Channel stability will be assessed on a yearly basis using photographs to visually document the
condition of the restored project streams. Photographs will be taken from the same location in
the same direction each year. Thirty-two photo points were established during baseline
monitoring and are shown in the CCPV (Figure 2) and As-built Plan Sheets (Appendix E).
Visual assessments of channel stability will also be made regularly throughout the monitoring
year. Any potential issues with the site will be documented, photographed and reported in the
yearly monitoring report. Additional cross-sections will only be surveyed if instability is
documented during monitoring.
2.2.4 Stream Hydrology
Two pressure transducers were installed on UT1, UT2 and UT3, and one pressure transducer
was installed on UT4 to document stream flow and the occurrence of bankfull events within the
monitoring period. The locations of these gauges are shown in the CCPV (Figure 2 in Appendix
B) and As-built Plan Sheets (Appendix E). Gauges were installed in the downstream end of
pools.
• The constructed bankfull elevation at each gauge was recorded. This elevation will be
compared with the gauge readings to determine whether a bankfull event has occurred.
Photos will be taken of flood indicators such as debris lines and sediment deposition on
the floodplain whenever it is apparent that a bankfull event has occurred.
• The elevation at the head of the downstream riffle at each gauge was also recorded.
This elevation will be compared with the gauge readings to determine the duration of
continuous flow.
A tipping bucket rain gauge was also installed to accurately document rainfall at the Site. The
rainfall data will be compared to the flow gauge data to verify that high flows at the Site are
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 8
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPP Surry County, North Carolina

correlated with rainfall events. The monitoring gauges will be downloaded regularly throughout
each monitoring year and data will be presented the annual monitoring reports.
2.3 Riparian Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring will evaluate the establishment of planted and volunteer
vegetation across the Site. Monitored parameters, methods, schedule/frequency, and extent
are summarized in Table D. These monitoring parameters follow USACE guidance but will also
allow for monitoring of other parameters to document site performance related to the project
goals listed in Section 1.1.
Table D. Riparian Vegetation Monitoring Summary
Schedule/
Parameter Method Number/Extent Data Collected
Frequency
Permanent Between July Species, height,
1st and leaf 6 plots, spread
vegetation plots, location, planted vs.
drop.As-built, across riparian
0.02 acre in size volunteer, age, woody
Vegetation Years 1, 2, 3, 5, planting zones
establishment (minimum) and 7 stem count.
and vigor Annual random Between July 7 plots,
vegetation plots, 1st and leaf randomly Species, height,
0.02 acre in size drop. Years 1, 2, selected each woody stem count.
(minimum) 3, 5, and 7 year
1 Plot numbers 1, 2, 6,8, 10, 11.The remaining plots are in wetlands and covered in Section 2.4.
2.3.1 Baseline Vegetation Monitoring
Baseline vegetation monitoring occurred in May 2020, soon after site planting was completed.
Final vegetation plot location did not vary significantly from the locations suggested in the
mitigation plan. The corners of the permanent vegetation plots were marked using steel t-posts
and the location of each plot was recorded using GPS. The individual trees within each
permanent plot were tagged and labeled to facilitate monitoring efforts in future years. The
planted stems were counted and measured during baseline monitoring. Species data will be
collected during Monitoring Year 1. In subsequent monitoring years, the location of the
temporary random vegetation plots will be recorded using GPS and species and height data will
be collected.
The locations of permanent vegetation plots 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, and 11 are shown in the CCPV (Figure
2). The other permanent vegetation plots are located in wetlands and described in Section
2.4.1. Planted stems per plot in MVO ranged from 14 to 21, or 567 to 850 stems per acre.
2.4 Wetland Monitoring
Wetland monitoring will include monitoring of the hydrologic functions and the establishment
of planted and volunteer vegetation within WA, WB and WC. Monitored parameters, methods,
schedule/frequency, and extent are summarized in Table E. These monitoring parameters
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 9
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPR Surry County, North Carolina

follow USACE guidance but will also allow for monitoring of other parameters to document site
performance related to the project goals listed in Section 1.1.
Table E. Wetland Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/ Number/Extent Data Collected
Frequency
9 gauges; two
Continuous each in WA and
Wetland Pressure transducers recordings WC,three in Water surface
Hydrology through growing WB, and two in elevation.
season the wetland
creation area.
5 plots; one Species, height,
each in WA,WC,
Permanent vegetation location, planted
and the creation
plots, 0.02 acre in size As-built, Years 1, vs. volunteer, age,
Vegetation (minimum) 2, 3, 5, and 7 area between woody stems
establishment WA and WB, count.
and vigor Between July 1st and two in WB.
Annual random and leaf drop 3 plots, Species, height,
vegetation plots, 0.02 randomly woody stems
ed
acre in size (minimum) sele yeareach count.
1 Plot numbers 3,4, 5, 7, and 9.The remaining plots are in wetlands and covered in Section 2.3.
2.4.1 Wetland Hydrology
Two pressure transducers were installed in WA and two were installed in WC, three pressure
transducers were installed in WB, and two were installed in the wetland creation area to
document hydroperiod at the Site during monitoring. The locations of these gauges are shown
in the CCPV (Figure 2 in Appendix B) and As-built Plan Sheets (Appendix E). Hydrological
sampling will continue to take place throughout the growing season at intervals necessary to
satisfy the jurisdictional hydrology success criteria within each wetland creation area (USEPA
1990). According to the Soil Survey of Surry County, the growing season is from April 8 to
October 26 (USDA 2007). The beginning of the growing season will be confirmed annually by
soil temperatures exceeding 41 degrees Fahrenheit at 20 inches (50 cm) depth and/or bud
burst. Soil temperatures will be collected within wetlands A, B, C, and the creation area in late
March of each monitoring year and will be reported in the annual monitoring report.
A tipping bucket rain gauge was also installed to accurately document rainfall at the Site. The
rainfall data will be compared to the groundwater gauge data to verify that high water levels at
the Site are correlated with rainfall events. The monitoring gauges will be downloaded regularly
throughout each monitoring year and data will be presented the annual monitoring reports.
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 10
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPP Surry County, North Carolina

2.4.2 Vegetation Establishment and Vigor
Baseline vegetation monitoring occurred in May 2020. Final vegetation plot location did not
vary significantly from the locations suggested in the mitigation plan. The corners of the
permanent vegetation plots were marked using steel t-posts and the location of each plot was
recorded using GPS. The individual trees within each permanent plot were tagged and labeled
to facilitate monitoring efforts in future years. The planted stems were counted and measured
during baseline monitoring. Species data will be collected during Monitoring Year 1. In
subsequent monitoring years, the location of the temporary random vegetation plots will be
recorded using GPS and species and height data will be collected.
The locations of permanent vegetation plots 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 are shown in the CCPV (Figure 2).
The other permanent vegetation plots are located in riparian communities rather than wetlands
and are described in Section 2.3.1. Planted stems per plot in MY0 ranged from 16 to 21, or 647
to 850 stems per acre.
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 11
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPR Surry County, North Carolina

3.0 REFERENCES
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services. 2017. As-
built Baseline Monitoring Report Format, Data, and Content Requirement June 2017.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2008. Yadkin Pee-Dee Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2016. Wilmington District Public Notice: Notification of Issuance
of Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for
Wilmington District.
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site 12
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report-FINAL
EPR Surry County, North Carolina

Appendix A
Project Information Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes

Table 1a. Project Mitigation Components
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Existing Mitigation As-Built
Project Footage Plan Footage Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Mitigation Comments
Segment or Footage or or Category Level Level Ratio(X:1) Credits
Acerage Acreage Acreage
UT1 a 1170 1567 1567 Cool R P1 1.00000 1567 Creditable length begins following
utility easement. I
UT1b 0 538 538 Cool - P1 0.00000 0 E channel through wetland may not
maintain high-water mark.
UT1c 0 688 688 Cool R P2 1.00000 688 Culverted crossing not included in
mitigation length.
UT2a 1019 1186 1186 Cool R P1 1.00000 1186
Culverted crossing not included in
UT2b 929 1011 1023 Cool R P2 1.00000 1023 mitigation length.Channel re
aligned during construction to avoid
bedrock.
UT2c 240 240 240 Cool El - 1.50000 160 Pedestrian bridge crossing not
included in mitigation length.
UT3a 1526 1378 1378 Cool R P2 1.00000 1378 Culverted crossing not included in
mitigation length.
UT3b 186 190 190 Cool El - 1.50000 127
UT3c 1015 1087 1087 Cool R P1 1.00000 1087 Riffle crossing not included in I
mitigation length.
UT3d 109 97 97 Cool Ell - 2.50000 39
UT4 89 134 130 Cool El - 1.50000 86 Jurisdicational point moved
downstream during construction.
Red text indicates values updated from Approved MBI.
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
EPR RESTORATION

Table 1a. Project Mitigation Components (continued)
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Existing Mitigation As-Built
Project Footage Plan Footage Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Mitigation Comments
Segment or Footage or or Category Level Level Ratio(X:1) Credits
Acerage Acreage Acreage
Planted,excluded livestock,
plugged ditches,and
WA 1.400 0.830 0.830 RR Rehabilitation 1.50000 0.55 encompassess section of priority 2
reach.Calculation error in Approved
MBI.
Planted,excluded livestock,
WB 2.400 1.030 1.030 RR Rehabilitation 1.50000 0.69 plugged ditches,and
encompassess section of priority 2
reach.
Planted,excluded livestock,
plugged ditches,and
WC 0.800 0.540 0.520 RR Rehabilitation 1.50000 0.35 encompassess section of priority 2
reach. Easement crossing relocated
during construction.
Wetland Planted,excluded livestock,and
Creation 0.000 1.290 1.290 RR Creation 3.00000 0.43 encompassess section of priority 2
reach.
Red text indicates values updated from Approved MBI.
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report ECOSYSTEM
rE PLANNING&
PR RESTORATION

Table 1b. Project Mitigation Components
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Stream Credits Riparian Wetland
Restoration Level Credits Non-Rip Coastal
Wetland Marsh
Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv
Restoration 6929.000
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation 1.590
Enhancement
Enhancement I 373.000
Enhancement II 39.000
Creation 0.430
Preservation
Totals 7341.000 2.020
Total Base SMUs 7 7341.000
Credit Loss in Required Buffer -238.490
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 929.870
Net Change in Credit from Buffers 691.390
Total Adjusted SMUs* 8032.390
*Credit adjustment for Non-standard Buffer Width calculation using Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator(Updated 1/19/2019)
Red text indicates values updated from Approved MBI.
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report P rvI
PLANNING&
EPR RESTORATION

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 0 yrs 3 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 0 yrs 2 months
Number of reporting Years': 0
Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery
Institution Date - Oct-17
404 permit date - Nov-19
Final Mitigation Plan 2018 to 2019 Nov-19
Final Design—Construction Plans - Nov-19
Site Earthwork Dec 2019 to April 2020 Apr-20
As-Built Survey Performed May-20 May-20
Bare root plantings - Apr-20
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report(Monitoring Year 0) May-20 Jun-20
Year 1 Monitoring 2020 Dec-20
Year 2 Monitoring 2021 Dec-21
Year 3 Monitoring 2022 Dec-22
Year 4 Monitoring 2023 Dec-23
Year 5 Monitoring 2024 Dec-24
Year 6 Monitoring 2025 Dec-25
Year 7 Monitoring 2026 Dec-26
1 =The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank ECOSYSTEM
PLANNiNG&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report EPR RESTORATION

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
Designer
1150 SE Maynard Rd.Ste 140 Cary, NC 27511
Primary project design POC Kevin Tweedy, PE(919)388-0787
Construction Contractor North State Environmental
2889 Lowery St,Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Construction contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland
Survey Contractor Turner Land Surveying, PLLC
PO Box 148,Swannanoa, NC 28778
Survey contractor POC Lissa Turner(919)827-0745
Planting Contractor North State Environmental
2889 Lowery St,Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Planting contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland
Seeding Contractor North State Environmental
2889 Lowery St,Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Contractor point of contact Darrell Westmoreland
Nursery Stock Suppliers Foggy Mountain Nursery
Dykes and Son Nursery
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
Monitoring Performers
Stream Monitoring POC Cidney Jones, EPR(919)388-0787
Vegetation Monitoring POC Tom Barrett, EPR(919)388-0787
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report EPR RESTORATION

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Project Background Information
Project Name Red Barn Mitigation Bank
County Surry County
Project Area(acres) 25.3
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 36.489800,-80.641100
Planted Acreage(Acres of Woody Stems
Planted) 22.2
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin Pee-Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8- 03040101 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14- 3040101100010
digit digit
Project Drainage Area(Acres and Square 233.1 acres/0.47 Sq.Mi.
Miles)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of 1
Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification Pasture(22.5%), Forest(27.3%), Residential(21.3%),
Cropland(17.4%), Urban(7%)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters UT1 UT2 UT3 UT4
Length of reach(linear feet) 2255 2449 2752 130
Valley confinement(Confined,moderately Unconfined Unconfined Confined Confined
confined, unconfined)
47.4 acres/0.05 93.23 acres/0.15 82.21 acres/0.25
Drainage area(Acres and Square Miles) 10.22 acres/0.02 sq. mi.
sq.mi. sq. mi. sq. mi.
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Perennial/ Perennial Intermittent
Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification N/A
Stream Classification(existing) B5 B5/F5 B/G5, B4c,and F4 B5
Stream Classification(proposed) C5b/C5 C5/B5c B4/B4c/C4 B4c
Evolutionary trend(Simon) Stage 2/5 Stage 2/5 Stage 3-5 Stage 5
FEMA classification AE/X AE/X AE/X X
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report EPR RESTORATION

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes (continued)
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetland A Wetland B Wetland C Wetland D
Size of Wetland(acres) 1.2 2.4 0.8 0.04
Wetland Type(non-riparian,riparian riverine Riparian Riverine Riparian Riverine Riparian Riverine Riparian Riverine
or riparian non-riverine)
Dillard fine sandy Rhodhiss
Mapped Soil Series loam Colvard and suches Colvard and suches Bannertown
Complex
Drainage class Moderately Well- Well-drained Well-drained Well-drained
Drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-Hydric' Non-Hydric` Non-Hydric` Non-Hydric.
Groundwater, Groundwater,
Source of Hydrology Perecipitation and Perecipitation and precipitation,runoff, precipitation,
runoff runoff runoff,overbank
overbank flooding
flooding
Restoration or enhancement method Hydrologic and Hydrologic and Hydrologic and
(hydrologic,vegetative etc.) Vegetative Vegetative Vegetative
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes Yes USACE Nationwide Permit No.27-ID#SAW-
2017-01927
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes Yes DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification No.4134-
ID#18-0182
Division of Land Quality(Erosion and General Permit NCG010000-ID#SURRY-2020-
Sediment Control) Yes Yes 015
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes
Appendix 5 of Mitigation Plan
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA or No
CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes Yes Surry County Zoning Permit approved 8/23/2019
Essential Fisheries Habitat No -
+Jurisdictional wetlands were identified on soils mapped as non-hydric.
Appendix A
Red Barn Mitigation Bank ECOSYSTEM
PLANNSNG&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report EPR RESTORATION

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Exhibits and Guidance
Figure 1. Project Location Map
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3. Riparian Buffer Zones
Baseline Photo Log
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator

o I morhorL.
1 S, f' pa; 4.
t) * I
` + O, L+Lino,Fd�.
in a*
SURRY COUNTY % a
\� i �6�
%� m A 1.1 0
a23
a ' y
I's x 11i Rive rxqe
Pan
Lr a
�S
db �'0e sr odenoe tiiv N Oak Stf.
1ndc4e S
Site Coordinates a Hardy's
CustomGoit 9 ----W Pine St - «�_ ~--
36.4898 °N Center Oldr15.a _-0e9
r= W.. Mt Airy
4 80.6411 °W 7 104,/td :. "e sr
* ,. s
z si pqi
Er Oak RidgeQ V-a a s '%s ^o
r 0,a. 5)
413 EN'ernont Rd .� yS
ir
e- UGC r
•
CD r
Il'ed Brush Rd w CaugNc Worth St
N.
s. 0 S], 1(I
z
A Snoylhilll7r 6
tr Q
3
r s� o
D naY di FNurF
• Airvtcw 0ei- T Cr14,. Park
c A ,a,C�r,e
Wars -
°°Rd $ __ _
r
a i601
h
prnevtew Or w
d b
Carte'Si
�o�
Coot" Chandirr Ra vltv`p
v
'n
Q
O SCOtt$Utz,,,;,k d Creek
Legend R:"har ¢C. W /�
e.
0'..al i��el 4,
Conservation Easement —.Po+'riry �ekq"r��
PREPARED BY:
0 1,500 3,000 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE ECOSYSTEM
Feet PL4NNING &
VICINITY MAP
EPR RESTORATION
FIGURE 1 SURRY COUNTY, NC MAY 2020

ate = +
' _41FiejlIGURE�r y + � r
x
__.‘i , „ '10....X. ..... „_,. '74 1
Y \ `
r i cl L A - . \ 0 �," • �- 1V
Y T• m
,
f' o #. FIGURE a ' r', ..
r n Ar y t h... s`T
to\
, i ,- .
4. , lit • t• • •. 1 '''''--.;-... , 4_ • .
re
�f, r ! i .• W
- t
A r 4
o Photo Points Cross Section Monitoring Gauges Structures
Gates Wetland -Creation • Baro Gauge Top of Bank
i i Fencing k:';::•:':I Wetland - Existing $ Rain Gauge Pre-Existing Streams
Project Streams Vegetation Plots $ Stream Gauge
Conservation Easement • Wetland Gague NC OneMap Orthoimagery(2018)
0 300 600 N RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
0
' Feet CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW: OVERVIEW MAP MAY 2020
1 inch =600 feet MYO: 2020 mrogrroon serWcec
ECOSYSTEM
FIGURE 2 SURRY COUNTY, NC
PLANNING&
RESTORATION

r` 7 Bamboo to be treated in Winter 2020
XS1
81 \I
:::
TSG1 =�As
IXp 'if
UT1
.. illtraie j:Iffr7
WG1® .., ... .
VP34.1.1.1t7 /
.balk
Allif
WG3•
RAIN GAb ® =•A, i 1+• '•
+.., +. �4+
40 • i'-
A 4t
XS4
2� �G4
Og VP4
:(VP5
)(SS `yams6
0 Photo Points Cross Section Monitoring Gauges Structures
A Gates Wetland - Creation • Baro Gauge Top of Bank
i i Fencing 1:::•-:::•:':I Wetland - Existing ® Rain Gauge Pre-Existing Streams
Project Streams MI Vegetation Plots ® Stream Gauge
Conservation Easement • Wetland Gague NC OneMap Orthoimagery(2018)
o 100 200 N RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
0
' Feet CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW: ASSET MAP AUGUST 2020
1 inch =200 feet MYO: 2020 Mtganon Seevkes
,�`FIGURE 2Aa SURRY COUNTY, NC ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
RESTORATION

XS4
2 � ® G4
C VP4
LT1
XS9 = `i
f�
VP5 ....
XS5 ®':::':.:
WG5
:. :'•, r.
WG6ED s ` •r
XS7SG311
VP7
XS6
i -T - - _ � UT2
• `���' � ;,; •:.,t��`Jlr ,,,�, � ., �l r ,,'tip- 'vr • r�-� •. ,
SG4 VP8.A 4s 'x " t. AI ar
y.wr r
Pedestrian Crossing;
UT3
O Photo Points Cross Section Monitoring Gauges Structures
o Gates Wetland - Creation • Baro Gauge Top of Bank
Fencing Wetland - Existing ® Rain Gauge Pre -Existing Streams
Project Streams Vegetation Plots ® Stream Gauge
(� Conservation Easement • Wetland Gague NC OneMap Orthoimagery (2018)
0 100 200 N RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
Feet CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW: ASSET MAP 1C_AUGUST 2020
1 inch = 200 feet MYO: 2020 Mrtrym�o�seevkes
ECOSYSTEM
FIGURE 213 SURRY COUNTY, NC PLANNING&
ARESTORATION

.:�
rr% 1stags' t.
4-4
WG8
t.„.* j D • BA- •' - - t?
4.
Riffle Crossing
SG5 ©`.
ti
:vil SG7
lk. il ? ........--,," r` ---_, ._ , ..
tI I 'A,l ' ,*iI XS12 1
if
I.
x�; -ji Y ' 16
i; 1 • m ' ' . "
0 Photo Points Cross Section Monitoring Gauges Structures
A Gates Wetland - Creation • Baro Gauge Top of Bank
i i Fencing 1::••.:::•::::I Wetland - Existing ® Rain Gauge Pre-Existing Streams
Project Streams MI Vegetation Plots ® Stream Gauge
MM Conservation Easement • Wetland Gague NC OneMap Orthoimagery(2018)
0 100 200 N 0 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
' Feet CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW: ASSET MAP AUGUST 2020
1 inch =200 feet MYO: 2020 Nirrifp8pn servkec
ECOSYSTEM
FIGURE 2G SURRY COUNTY, NC
,�`F4- PLANNING BC
RESTORATION

— -': 11 —".-:'r -' ", • " ' r‘ .. ...4 . . ..... ,"V.4.F, '>..= r- ": . .''.,0,4k, . " :' \I„...,----0," '': "...,'"'`,_-','"t",.-.- .'i "' -
C
• ` -'WC 4 �, u .- "�� l •'''psi .' -�" -fi" }, - . R}
. a
{ �a �� � : � �3� "�r try
h
.w f�
<:' ')';,,L',... -...t ' ; ' c11111111111111. .,,,, ,:ti, -
it,
_ .. + allikL.'
LEGEND ' .
CONSERVATION EASEMENT = mac e• r- •
IDEAL BUFFER ZONES �' :: ' ' ., :-
ACTUAL BUFFER ZONENtv
S ` 144: �S. P ate �C
015 i..
ir 15 20 -.
20-25
25 30 .
-
30-50 r ` �'
50-75
y i `'ih'k --.1.114�y
75100 # fi rt x t� �;
100-1 25 k.:
7,4
125-150 ,
o 250 500 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PREPARED ST
ECOSYSTEM
Feet RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES PLANNING &
EPR RESTORATION
FIGURE 3 SURRY COUNTY, NC MAY 2020

Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Baseline - Photo Log
UTI
r .r. .t - _ ` :ems.
�z � i,� �� ".� �a „_ ., 'n _ emst .::r ,;, ' � $
Photo Point 1 —Sta. 12+25 Photo Po int 2—Sta. 14+3,..17.„.„4,,,,,,,,4„,,,,,:,.,;,!.•,.., , ._, ..„ .„,.1.4.„*.•:„..;:::....„. _ ...., :ii ..,4„
Facing Upstream (3/27/2020) Facing Upstrea •
m (1/22/2020)
1111,
` a
it . �a
Photo Point 3—Sta. 14+40 Photo Point 4—Sta. 21+70
Facing Downstream (3/18/2020) Facing Downstream (3/18/2020)
1r^, ei a
n "$per �' r ��,'�^' ��-�, a.,i§� "-+$d�'�t
�rA .. y{„V_
va k e v i rtr '�`
Photo Point 5—Sta. 23+80 Photo Point 6—Sta. 29+60
Facing Downstream (3/18/2020) Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
Appendix B
ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

UT1
a s• ro� I,0 ~ � i 3 F erg.'.: -�
.•.r:. ._.' . .lrS.� - tin F -
Photo Point 7—Sta. 31+50 ; �'
Facing Downstream (4/16/2020)
P� . Pk1 k
' ,� ,
Photo Point 8—Sta. 31+50
' - �; �--' �, Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
pr
'tei-i� ;{5 ,"{:,2 FY' ;
�y �`�� C7�`4,� j.- � 1
!J`s7gf'Sft s` -`
s;r •I:. r*Ply tj h
,, 3;1 kl j Y.
Photo Point 9—Sta. 34+40
Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
UT2
' fir, ��.��,� ..,
•. ,� .
..._ ua mks .
A c, s „ ,,
— Y_. \fi�! '
Photo Point 10—Sta. 10+40 Photo Point 11 —Sta. 14+75
Facing Downstream (4/16/2020) Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
Appendix B
r. ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

UT2
/ ?= hh.4—.0 `� U. � S
u 4 '
v
'. ism.. • .'. .w,F .=w a .ti
Photo Point 12—Sta. 15+80 Photo Point 13—Sta. 18+65
Facing Upstream (3/27/2020) Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
. I1.iw it a.
s --•' , t�(� �y ram•'.
Photo Point 14—Sta. 22+00 Photo Point 15—UT2 Culvert
Facing Upstream (4/16/2020) Facing Upstream (4/16/2020)
L r ip
s
•
'` ,. o-
? i ; r
Photo Point 16—UT2 Culvert Photo Point 17—Sta. 29+50
Facing Downstream (4/16/2020) Facing Upstream (4/16/2020)
Appendix B
ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

UT2
�,.�
g
X
�M rrX> n v }ash
b y : ' '- t
�r' k a -:
kJ-
Photo Point 18-Sta 31+36 Photo Point 19-Sta 34+10
Facing Downstream (4/16/2020) Facing Upstream, Pedestrian Crossing (7/29/2020)
UT3
Y :,
.. s - ; {
aid Y- »xq�. .,
Photo Point 20-Sta. 13+50 Photo Point 21 -UT3 Culvert
Facing Upstream (4/16/2020) Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
, 4
irli
„g
3 w .
.� gy �, r
'� :i
y e,
I� "T C - g
lat•iiti---1",:g;...--';'''.."?.,.:f ;,;••••••,,,..,••Z„..., '•-.4.--.".
Photo Point 22-UT3 Culvert Photo Point 23-Sta. 22+00
Facing Downstream (3/27/2020) Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
Appendix B
ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

UT3
Plirlir
akd�} >.y1'
+,oft+.olirte
� , � ;
w
g
Photo Point 24—Sta. 25+50 Photo Point
Facing Upstream (4/16/2020) Facing Downstream25— (3/18/202Sta. 28+050)
_,„.„,1„...-1...,,,. . *141...4-1P-zi," :':":I " '-443ii --4-,..„.:„..:. ..
, `s '
. • , -,..-,„ ',fi•*4T-4,*•.47''''N-r,*..F',;','--1-_,,.''', ••'.'.2,,,,. _:-., ,A.,:„.4,_
_.
, _,., '..v ,4.gtfr,' '.--A.,,,'-' ,,, --;-T4•'1,-:' -..''%',0"1"4'0..-',7-*
fwY tee:
7 p p,. a
.r "fie-, +a fir "� fi � �
Photo Point 26—Sta..30+75 Photo Point 27—Sta. 33+00
Facing Upstream,ATV Crossng (9/29/2020) Facing Upstream (4/16/2020)
a y�,
-c -,,,,,,,,,,A.:.. .. ........-,.,-.:
,-, A
y
a`ate r:
-. -'i.� s � "�. " �- - „may�,:.s nw.
�; ti ,,
'-'4 '-41?*'' '14 ;--,51.,14.:..t.-;_-----, ----:::,-;,-.
: - �u'a►, is -,.,4' �
�� � g#
•
�� r ri °—. ' �q
4:1-
•
Photo Point 28—Sta. 36+00 Photo Point 29—Sta. 36+65
Facing Upstream (3/27/2020) Facing Upstream (3/27/2020)
Appendix B
ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

v v rr11� f
�"Rd4 .
L• _ - n% Spy 3 �m`�
" its n �r�, � .,
,Nr0•4•,,;•;y4--;;Ike:`,.•
Photo Point 30—Sta. 36+g5
Facing Downstream (3/27/2020)
UT4
•
.o-
-1;.,= 4ere' t ' C'
"4' ' .try . 'a r . � a
'Yf z 'a ! ;( a3t , . ak *t* A 8- hrt il " „,,„ a' .. y ¢ "
x
h
f .a xk xss . .ttf `E',i ' .- am.
Photo Point 31 —Sta. 10+25 Photo Point 32—Sta. 11+00
Facing Upstream (3/27/2020) Facing Upstream (4/16/2020)
ECOSYSTEM
f...Appendix B
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Site Name: Red Barn Mitigation Bank
USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-01927
NCDWR Project Number: NA
Sponsor: NCDOT
County: Surry
Minimum Required Buffer Widths: 30
Mitigation Ratio Creditable Stream
Mitigation Type Baseline Stream Credit
Multiplier2 Length
Restoration(1:1) 1 6929 6929.00
Enhancement I(1.5:1) 1.5 560 373.33
Enhancement II(2.5:1) 2.5 97 38.80
Preservation(5:1) 5
Other(7.5:1) 7.5
Other(10:1) 10
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals 7586.00 7341.13
Buffer Width Zone(feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
Buffer Zones less than 15 feet >15 to 20 feet >20 to 25 feet >25 to 30 feet >30 to 50 feet >50 to 75 feet >75 to 100 feet >100 to 125 feet >125 to 150 feet
Max Possible Buffer(square feet)4 227580 75860 75860 75860 303440 379300 379300 379300 379300
Ideal Buffer(square feet)5 229256 75047.4 73541.3 72117.4 281281 347624 348406 350252 354063
Actual Buffer(square feet)6 224609 72300.6 70157.4 68209.1 235238 159650.5889 67320.01043 37906.42658 26495.0984
Zone Multiplier 50% 20% 15% 15% 9% 7% 6% 5% 3%
Buffer Credit Equivalent 3670.57 1468.23 1101.17 1101.17 660.70 513.88 440.47 367.06 220.23
Percent of Ideal Buffer 98% 96% 95% 95% 84% 46% 19% 11% 7%
Credit Adjustment -74.40 -53.74 -50.67 -59.68 552.55 236.01 85.11 39.73 16.48
Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in
Total Baseline Credit Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
7341.13 -238.49 929.87 691.39 8032.52
'Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank(50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties)
2Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios,which are equal to the number of feet in the feet-to-credit mitigation ratio(e.g.,for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit,the multiplier would be 8).
3Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type. If stream reaches are not creditable,they should be excluded from this measurement,even if they fall within the easement.
4This amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width. This number is not used in calculations,but is provided as a reference.
'Maximum potential size(in square feet)of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches,calculated using GIS,including areas outside of the easement. The inner zone(0-15')should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known. Non-creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
'Square feet in each buffer zone,as measured by GIS,excluding non-forested areas,all other credit type(e.g.,wetland,nutrient offset,buffer),easement exceptions,open water,areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard,etc.Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width,so areas within the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement. Non-creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Vegetation Planting Information
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 7. Stem Count By Plot
Vegetation Photo Log

Table 5. Vegetation Planting Information
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Livestake Planting (1.5 acres)
Scientific Name Common Name % by Species Approx. Stem
Count
Corpus amomum Silky dogwood 40% 1960
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 10% 490
Salix sericea Silky willow 30% 1470
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 10% 490
Salix nigra Black willow 10% 490
Total 100% 4901
Zone 2 - Riparian Buffer(12.2 acres)
680 stems per acre (8'x 8'spacing)
Scientific Name Common Name %by Species Approx.Stem Wetland Indicator
Count Status
Betula nigra River Birch 15% 1244 FACW
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 10% 830 FAC
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry 5% 415 FACW
Diospryos virginiana Persimmon 10% 830 FAC
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 25% 2074 FACW
Quercus nigra Water Oak 10% 830 FAC
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 15% 1244 FAC
Ulmus americana American Elm 10% 830 FACW
Total 100% 8296
Zone 3 -Wetlands (6.8 acres)
680 stems per acre (8'x 8' spacing)
Scientific Name Common Name %by Species Approx.Stem Wetland Indicator
Count Status
TREES
Betula nigra River Birch 15% 694 FACW
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 25% 1156 FACW
Quercus michauxii Swamp chesnut oak 25% 1156 FACW
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 15% 694 FAC
Ulmus americana American Elm 10% 462 FACW
SHRUBS
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 5% 231 OBL
Cephanlanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 2% 92 OBL
Ilex verticillata Winterberry 3% 139 FACW
Total 100% 4624
Appendix C
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING SYSTEM&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report I EPR RESTORATION

Table 5 (continued). Vegetation Planting Information
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Zone 4 -Wetlands (1.3 acres)
680 stems per acre (8'x 8' spacing)
Scientific Name Common Name %by Species Approx.Stem Wetland Indicator
Count Status
Carya glabra Pignut Hickory 10% 88 FACU
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory 12% 106 NI*
Cercis canadensis Redbud 5% 44 FACU
Corpus florida Flowering Dogwood 5% 44 FACU
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 12% 106 FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 12% 106 FACU
Oxydendrum arboreum Sourwood 5% 44 UPL
Quercus a/ba White Oak 15% 133 FACU
Quercus falcata Southern Red Oak 12% 106 FACU
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 12% 106 FACU
Total 100% 884
Zone 6 -Wetland Containerized Stock(0.4 acres)
680 stems per acre (8'x 8' spacing)
Scientific Name Common Name %by Species Approx.Stem Wetland Indicator
Count Status
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 100% 272 FACW
Total 100% 272
*NI=No indicator status
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Success
Criteria
Plot# Total Stems per Acre Met?
1 769 Yes
2 567 Yes
3 647 Yes
4 688 Yes
5 567 Yes
6 769 Yes
7 850 Yes
8 728 Yes
9 728 Yes
10 850 Yes
11 567 Yes
Project Avg 703 Yes
Appendix C
ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report I EPR RESTORATION

Table 7. Stem Count By Plot
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Current Plot Data(MY0 2020)
Species VP-1 VP-2 VP-3 VP-4 VP-5 VP-6
Scientific Name —Common Name Type Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol I Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub JI
Betula nigra River Birch Tree
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood Tree
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Tree
ephanlanthus occidentali Buttonbush Shrub
Corpus amomum Silky dogwood Shrub
Diospryos virginiana Persimmon Tree
Ilex verticillata Winterberry Shrub
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark Shrub
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree
Quercus michauxii Swamp chesnut oak Tree
Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Salix nigra Black willow Tree
Salix sericea Silky willow Tree
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry Shrub
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree
Initial count of bare root planted stems,species TBD 19 19 14 14 16 16 17 17 14 14 19 19
Stem count 19 0 19 14 0 14 16 0 16 17 0 17 14 0 14 19 0 19
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 I 1 0 1
Stems per ACRE 769 0 769 567 0 567 647 0 647 688 0 688 567 0 567 769 0 769
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer Species Included in Total
Appendix C ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 7 (continued). Stem Count By Plot
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Current Plot Data(MY0 2020) Annual Means
Species VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 VP-11 MY0(2020)
Scientific Name —Common Name Type Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol I Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub JI
Betula nigra River Birch Tree
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood Tree
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Tree
ephanlanthus occidentali Buttonbush Shrub
Corpus amomum Silky dogwood Shrub
Diospryos virginiana Persimmon Tree
Ilex verticillata Winterberry Shrub
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark Shrub
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree
Quercus michauxii Swamp chesnut oak Tree
Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Salix nigra Black willow Tree
Salix sericea Silky willow Tree
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry Shrub
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree
Initial count of bare root planted stems,species TBD 21 21 18 18 18 18 21 21 14 14 17 17
Stem count 21 0 21 18 0 18 18 0 18 21 0 21 14 0 14 17 0 17
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 I 1 0 1
Stems per ACRE 850 0 850 728 0 728 728 0 728 850 0 850 567 0 567 703 0 703
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer Species Included in Total
Appendix C ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Vegetation Photo Log
,, y,.f I g �yQ,
-- �` �'" �' � �r"..
fib. .. ', i - K
rw e�..�`4`• -awB i`� , � u.: j ,.:• ,fir.?''_
ler,
•
- � 5,,:;„..":.:,
' �.nf F i'
�y
A.
nr
",•
"a^ '4Fs` u " �s s 2w r ti', �� `�'� 1 d7z$` v' u i. tc�` q, '4'y F j 5a t�y r 4 . ' wr x F ."k.+, � �am ,d �44P a.,h, �` fi' '` �� .4 y j► i " ' F . . « r € A�gga : ... d t -FF id. `, ,,t.,.- ''- R''� - � --W— - a`f4�-: y11�a*,.,"' - 3 , ' : .a �`i? �; i 4"fiy F 5'SY x' L y k M { k-. ,-i_.\ � maVeg Plot 1 —NW Corner(5/6/2020) ir_rR` NV eg Plot 2—E Corner(5/6/2020)
•
•
,
"'l+ Z.:
' ,. ' w Svc.. ` .h �rod .• ▪ d"- ", t ^� -Z-r : a• arT▪ a v k • pd ad
4 ' r„
T }tr _✓ a-, '',E s ux'^ is#" a' k .w' ;
Veg Plot 3—N Corner(5/6/2020) Veg Plot 4—W Corner(5/6/2020)
,., +.d v
* I $fir " `
8
tv 3'".'1,--,_}:::h ,: d ex'
., -.
i' as 4 r 8- 1'''•• .w "'•3 „f �, " -
,..-.. .,-yam a ,,wag$ s -' . w^�• c ^�: :^.r 1 :
=T " • ' 4::-.+{. a. „'. {
+ a"i" o• �'yy} yes ya. •4 may_ e '
• ^e , ..✓�'.I��T i_: '.�`�A3:� u v �- u a� 4 C'i .x .e .• — .. �..- .. h� xi. t,...
•
Veg Plot 5—NW Corner(5/6/2020) Veg Plot 6—W Corner(5/6/2020)
ECOSYSTEM
Appendix C
Red Barn Mitigation Bank . PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

�" x,�`�' .,
r - �.:5. ,.„ ems:
•
`',uvb x.�- N* F���+ f�`s- {emu g
v k ° 'k� f Ti�R `fit w y
Veg Plot 7—W Corner(5/6/2020) Veg Plot 8—W Corner(5/6/2020)
lillr
1
�
�- e s ,, . r '. 4$ - > c - �, �" xay, - . "`.tip y i r e�
# F '3�.t r z '� - '� 7. ..,, • sits •"'_ � :I' ca "' a
. F �+. A `: .1.. ,.. I'_ : ..`r!,i- . :hJ!n nxP- 3 � r( A wj t l .y.
Veg Plot 9—S Corner(5/6/2020) Veg Plot 10—S Corner(5/6/2020)
rg
;' - ,
v.-dde'" rt %_ Ems' ^'Se �, A , S T-4, f dr fV'1�:.
,
F "y
1' a->- PL _ p k „!Ga xa
Veg Plot 11 —SE Corner(5/6/2020)
ECOSYSTEM
Appendix C
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report RESTORATION

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table 10. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Cross Section Plots

Table 8a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT1a (1590 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 1 7 3.3 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.1 - 2 3.5 7.0 10.4 6.5 7.0 7.3 5.87 5.87 5.87 5.87 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 9.1 9.4 9.4 9.6 - 2 7.7 24.7 41.6 30.0 35.0 40.0 >40.3 >40.3 >40.3 >40.3 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 1 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 - 2 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 - 2 0.2 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1 6 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.9 - 2 1.0 3.5 6.0 2.6 3.0 3.7 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12.8 13.4 13.4 14.0 - 2 12.0 15.0 18.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.2 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 - 2 2.2 3.1 4.0 4.3 5.1 5.8 >6.87 >6.87 >6.87 >6.87 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 2.1 4.3 4.3 6.5 - 2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 4.0 17.3 18.2 29.0 10.9 4 Total riffle length 50%of reach length 10.0 20.5 32.0 13.4 18.6 18.8 22.8 3.1 10
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.008 0.024 0.043 0.013 0.025 0.024 0.037 0.007 10
Pool Length(ft) 10.0 10.6 10.7 11.0 0.4 3 Total pool length 50%of reach length 7.0 13.0 24.0 13.5 20.0 20.6 25.8 4.8 10
Pool Max depth(ft) 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 2 0.4 1.7 3.0 0.7 1.2 1.6 0.9 1.7 1.6 2.2 0.3 10
Pool Spacing(ft) 17.9 25.5 20.5 38.0 8.9 3 10.4 29.5 48.7 16.0 36.0 50.0 29.3 38.1 35.9 50.2 7.8 10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 13.0 21.0 21.0 29.0 8.2 4 N/A N/A 83.2 10 25.9 39 12.3 26.3 25.3 43.0 7.7 40
Radius of Curvature(ft) 22.0 61.6 47.0 130.0 40.9 5 7.0 21.7 36.4 14.5 16.5 20.5 12.0 18.0 17.7 23.8 2.9 41
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 3.7 10.4 7.8 22.0 6.1 5 2.0 2.8 3.5 2.1 2.4 3.0 2.0 3.1 3.0 4.1 0.5 41
Meander Wavelength(ft) 96.0 176.5 177.0 256.0 88.4 4 24.5 74.7 124.8 49 59.5 73 46.0 60.9 61.8 73.5 6.5 40
Meander Width Ratio 2.2 3.5 3.5 4.8 1.2 4 N/A N/A 8.0 1.4 3.8 5.6 2.1 4.5 4.3 7.3 1.3 40
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 0.54 0.60 0.30
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 93 75 63
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 32.7 33.6 26
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5 C5b C5b C5b
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.5 30.0 3.6 3.1 3.1 5.8
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 3 30 10.2 10 10 10
Valley length(ft) 617 1292 1292
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 650 1590 1590
Sinuosity(ft) 1.1 1.2 to 1.6 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.021 0.0162 0.0165
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.021 0.0162 0.0167
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) 0.1 1.0 2.0
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks 36%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1.The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4.Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING ex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT1c (738 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 2 8 3.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.2 7.5 10.2 6.9 7.5 8.0 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.2 25.0 40.8 65.0 142.5 220.0 >57.4 >57.4 >57.4 >57.4 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 1.1 0.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.40 0.53 0.70 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.8 1.2 0.50 0.70 0.90 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.5 6.5 3.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.5 4.0 6.5 2.76 4.00 5.60 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12.0 14.0 16.0 12.00 14.00 16.00 12.34 12.34 12.34 12.34 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.2 3.1 4.0 8.70 19.10 29.50 >9.29 >9.29 >9.29 >9.29 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total riffle length 50%of reach length 12.0 24.0 32.0 16.2 24.4 23.8 34.0 6.8 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.003 0.006 0.010 0.002 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.002 4
Pool Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total pool length 50%of reach length 11.0 16.0 22.0 12.5 19.3 19.4 26.0 5.3 4
Pool Max depth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.5 1.8 3.0 0.9 1.5 2.0 1.1 1.4 1.2 2.1 0.4 4
Pool Spacing(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 30.0 41.3 52.5 20.0 30.0 53.0 41.0 49.0 50.5 54.1 5.3 4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.7 23.0 81.6 26.8 38.6 47.4 29.4 38.7 39.0 45.7 3.8 11
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.4 14.0 35.7 16.7 20.7 23.7 14.3 20.4 21.3 25.7 3.2 13
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.0 2.8 3.5 2.2 2.8 3.2 2.3 3.3 3.4 4.1 0.5 13
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29.4 48.5 122.4 64.0 76.0 83.0 58.5 73.0 73.8 83.2 8.1 11
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.5 4.5 8.0 3.6 5.2 6.4 4.7 6.2 6.3 7.4 0.6 11
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 - 0.09 0.10
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull - 27 30
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 - 1.5 6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification - C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.6 22.0 3.7 - 0.6 3.9
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 4 33 13.0 - 12 12
Valley length(ft) - 537 537
Channel Thalweg length(ft) - 738 738
Sinuosity(ft) - 1.2 to 1.6 1.4 1.4
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) - 0.0032 0.0034
BF slope(ft/ft) - 0.0032 0.0031
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - 1.8 0.6
ill
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric -
Biological or Other -
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8c
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT2a (1197 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med I Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 2.5 8 4.0 7 13 13 19 - 2 4.6 7.6 10.1 6.9 7.5 8.0 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 10 50 50 89 - 2 10.1 25.3 40.4 40.0 70.0 100.0 >53.9 >53.9 >53.9 >53.9 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.2 • 0.4 0.4 0.6 - 2 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.40 0.53 0.70 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 - 2 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.50 0.70 0.90 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.8 6.8 3.8 4 4 4 4 - 2 1.8 4.3 6.8 2.76 4.00 5.60 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12 52 52 91 - 2 12.0 13.5 15.0 12.00 14.00 16.00 19.62 19.62 19.62 19.62 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 2 3 3 5 - 2 2.2 3.1 4.0 5.40 9.40 13.40 >7.04 >7.04 >7.04 >7.04 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.8 - 2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 8 21 23 30 9 4 Total riffle length 50%of reach length 10.0 17.0 40.0 11.5 19.0 17.0 32.2 6.9 10
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A • N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.009 0.014 0.024 0.009 0.013 0.012 0.018 0.002 10
Pool Length(ft) 7.6 9 8 11 1.5 3 Total pool length 50%of reach length 8.0 15.5 29.0 10.0 18.9 19.3 28.0 5.6 12
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.2 • 1.2 1.2 1.2 - 1 0.6 1.8 2.9 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.6 1.7 2.4 0.3 11
Pool Spacing(ft) 18 26 21 38 I 8.9 3 30.4 41.8 53.2 25.0 41.0 54.0 30.3 43.2 40.6 55.6 8.5 13
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 67 67 67 I 67 - 1 16.1 23.0 80.8 19.3 29.3 48.2 23.2 34.7 33.9 50.1 6.9 22
Radius of Curvature(ft) 40 55 55 69 - 2 9.2 14.0 35.4 16.7 19.0 23.7 11.7 19.1 19.1 24.6 3.1 24
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 3.1 4.2 4.2 1 5.3 - 2 2.0 2.8 3.5 2.2 2.6 3.2 1.5 2.5 2.5 3.2 0.4 24
Meander Wavelength(ft) 288 288 288 288 - 1 32.2 48.5 121.2 48.0 69.0 83.0 48.4 66.9 66.9 82.6 9.1 22
Meander Width Ratio 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 - 1 3.5 4.5 8.0 2.6 3.9 6.5 3.0 4.5 4.4 6.5 0.9 22
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 0.17 0.27 0.22
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 41 58 50
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 9.4 16.3 15
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5, D5 through wetland C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.6 18.9 3.8 2.3 2.4 4.7
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 4 34 14.4 14 14 14
Valley length(ft) 882 917 917
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 956 1197 1197
Sinuosity(ft) 1.08 1.2 to 1.6 1.28 1.3
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0091 0.0093 0.0092
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0091 0.0093 0.0091
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) 1.0 1.5 1.5
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks 44%
ill
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT2b (1062 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med I Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.8 16 6.0 8 8 8 8 - 1 6.0 11.0 15.0 8.4 9.9 10.2 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 - 1 13.2 36.6 60.0 40.0 55.0 70.0 >54.9 >54.9 >54.9 >54.9 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - 1 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.60 0.70 1.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 - 1 0.5 1.1 1.8 0.70 1.00 1.40 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3 15 7.2 6 6 6 6 - 1 3.0 9.0 15.0 5.04 7.00 10.20 4.14 4.14 4.14 4.14 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12 12 12 12 - 1 12.0 13.5 15.0 10.00 14.00 15.00 17.85 17.85 17.85 17.85 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1 1 1 1 - 1 2.2 3.1 4.0 4.30 5.90 7.50 >6.4 >6.4 >6.4 >6.4 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 - 1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 29 91.3 80 165 56 3 Total riffle length 50%of reach length 7.0 21.0 50.0 15.9 28.2 25.3 45.7 9.6 13
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.009 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.005 0.009 0.002 13
Pool Length(ft) 118 142 141.5 165 - 2 Total pool length 50%of reach length 13.0 26.5 39.0 19.0 23.9 22.6 35.7 4.8 10
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.3 1.8 1.8 2.1 0.3 4 0.8 2.6 4.4 1.1 1.8 3.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 2.1 0.2 10
Pool Spacing(ft) 128 246 272 339 88 3 44.0 60.5 77.0 26.0 55.0 69.0 44.5 56.3 57.3 67.0 7.6 10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 127 127 127 127 - 1 21.0 23.0 120.0 19.3 43.8 66.3 23.2 46.4 47.9 62.7 10.8 13
Radius of Curvature(ft) 35 73 64 121 44 3 12.0 14.0 52.5 15.7 27.7 32.7 21.1 26.9 27.6 32.9 3.5 12
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 4.4 9.2 8.0 15.1 4.5 3 2.0 2.8 3.5 1.7 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.1 3.2 3.8 0.4 12
Meander Wavelength(ft) 542 542 542 542 - 1 42.0 48.5 180.0 86.0 101.0 165.0 78.3 102.6 97.7 152.8 17.3 14
Meander Width Ratio 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 - 1 3.5 4.5 8.0 2.1 4.7 7.1 2.7 5.4 5.6 7.3 1.3 13
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 0.19 0.13 0.09
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 25 33 26
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 11.1 8.4 9
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification F5 C5 C5 C5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.6 30.0 3.9 1.9 1.6 6.8
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 9 90 27.8 20 28 28
Valley length(ft) 1065 840 840
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1095 1050 1062
Sinuosity(ft) 1.03 1.2 to 1.6 1.25 1.3
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.005 0.0032 0.0030
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.005 0.0032 0.0031
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) 0.3 1.1 1.0
li
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks N/A . ill
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT2c (244 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med I Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4 17 6.2 8 8 8 8 - 1 6.0 11.3 15.5 9.2 9.8 10.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 - 1 13.2 37.6 62.0 72.0 98.0 124.0 41.4 41.4 41.4 41.4 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - 1 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.60 0.70 0.90 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 - 1 0.5 1.1 1.8 0.70 1.00 1.20 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3 16 7.7 6 6 6 6 - 1 3.0 9.5 16.0 5.52 7.00 9.18 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12 12 12 12 - 1 12.0 13.5 15.0 12.00 14.00 15.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1 1 1 1 - 1 2.2 3.1 4.0 7.40 10.10 12.80 4.48 4.48 4.48 4.48 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 - 1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 29 91.3 80 165 56 3 Total riffle length 50%of reach length 9.0 25.5 32.0 14.8 23.2 23.9 28.4 4.6 5
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.005 0.006 0.014 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.009 0.002 5
Pool Length(ft) 118 142 141.5 165 - 2 Total pool length 50%of reach length 15.0 20.5 25.0 14.2 20.8 23.9 24.3 4.6 3
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 - 1 0.8 2.7 4.5 1.2 1.8 2.6 1.7 2.1 2.1 2.5 0.3 3
Pool Spacing(ft) 339 339 339 339 - 1 45.2 62.2 79.1 28.0 48.0 50.0 41.0 45.9 47.6 49.2 3.5 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 0.19 0.13 0.08
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 25 33 22
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 11.1 8.4 8
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification F5 B5c B5c B5c
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 3.3 5.8 3.9 1.9 1.6 7.2
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 10 93 29.8 20 28 28
Valley length(ft) 1065 242 242
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1095 244 244
Sinuosity(ft) 1.03 1.01 1.0
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.005 0.0035 0.0030
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.005 0.0035 0.0030
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) 0.3 0.5 0.1
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks 56% ill
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT3a (1410 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med I Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 2 8 3.5 5 6 6 6 0.7 3 4.2 7.7 10.8 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 6 8 8 10 1.6 3 5.9 14.8 23.8 9.0 11.5 14.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 3 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.0 3 0.3 0.8 1.3 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.5 6.5 3.2 2 2 2 3 0.1 3 1.5 4.0 6.5 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.57 1.57 1.57 1.57 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 9 12 12 16 2.7 3 12.0 15.0 18.0 13.00 13.00 13.00 19.93 19.93 19.93 19.93 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1 1 2 2 0.1 3 1.4 1.8 2.2 1.40 1.80 2.20 5.55 5.55 5.55 5.55 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.9 1.3 3.3 1.0 3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 1 3 9 9 15.8 4 5 Total riffle length 60-70%of reach length 4.5 15.0 29.0 12.5 17.9 17.5 27.6 4.1 11
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.024 0.033 0.043 0.021 0.030 0.030 0.042 0.006 11
Pool Length(ft) 2 10 10.1 17 6 4 Total pool length 30-40%of reach length 5.0 14.0 21.0 6.7 11.0 10.8 15.1 3.0 12
Pool Max depth(ft) 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.1 5 0.5 1.8 3.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.8 2.3 0.3 12
Pool Spacing(ft) 5.3 18.75 19.95 29.800 8.776 4 3.9 21.2 38.5 6.0 23.0 44.0 21.5 29.8 29.5 45.4 6.2 10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.2 17.2 28.2 9.0 14.1 13.8 20.9 2.8 12
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.7 20.1 27.1 18.1 24.1 28.1 28.1 4.4 13
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.5 3.2 4.4 3.2 4.3 5.0 5.0 0.8 13
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45.0 61.0 141.0 47.4 78.2 79.7 132.6 26.2 14
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.5 2.8 4.5 1.6 2.5 2.5 3.7 0.5 12
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 0.57 0.7 0.43
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 85 117 82
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 9 17 21
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B/G 5 B4 B4 B4
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.5 20.7 3.7 2.6 1.7 3.2
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 3.5 31 11.7 5 5 5
Valley length(ft) 1315 1395 1395
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1476 1410 1410
Sinuosity(ft) 1.12 1.1 to 1.2 1.07 1.01
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0241 0.0269 0.0256
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0241 0.0269 0.0258
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) 0.2 0.3 0.7
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks 30%
Channel Stability or Habitat MetricL ill
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8g. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT3b (190 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med I Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 2 8 3.5 7 7 7 7 - 1 4.2 7.7 10.8 7.6 7.6 7.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 10 10 10 10 - 1 5.9 14.8 23.8 11 14 17 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - 1 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1 0.3 0.8 1.3 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.5 6.5 3.2 4 4 4 4 - 1 1.5 4.0 6.5 4.50 4.50 4.50 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 10 10 10 10 - 1 12.0 15.0 18.0 13.00 13.00 13.00 12.76 12.76 12.76 12.76 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 2 2 2 2 - 1 1.4 1.8 2.2 1.40 1.80 2.20 3.58 3.58 3.58 3.58 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 - 1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total riffle length 60-70%of reach length 15.0 20.0 25.0 8.9 14.9 15.0 21.2 4.3 6
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.020 0.020 0.027 0.022 0.029 0.030 0.038 0.005 6
Pool Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total pool length 30-40%of reach length 10.0 15.0 24.0 14.7 16.5 16.2 20.3 1.8 6
Pool Max depth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.5 1.8 3.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.0 2.9 0.4 6
Pool Spacing(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.6 28.9 46.2 20.0 35.0 44.0 15.4 31.6 33.7 45.0 9.9 6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 - 0.49 0.52
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull - 91 91
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 - 13 28
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification - B4c B4c B4c
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.5 20.7 3.7 - 3 3.6
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 3.5 31 11.7 - 13.32 13.32
Valley length(ft) - 183 183
Channel Thalweg length(ft) - 190 190
Sinuosity(ft) - 1.1 to 1.3 1.04 1.04
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) - 0.0155 0.0159
BF slope(ft/ft) - 0.0155 0.0153
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - 0.1 0.1
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks -
Channel Stability or Habitat MetricL ill
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8h. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT3c (1097 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med I Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 2.5 9.5 4.4 8 8 8 8 - 1 4.9 8.6 11.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 9 9 9 9 - 1 >10.8 >10.8 >10.8 25.0 50.0 75.0 >40.0 >40.0 >40.0 >40.0 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 - 1 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - 1 0.4 0.9 1.5 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 2 9 4.5 4 4 4 4 - 1 2.0 5.5 9.0 4.50 4.50 4.50 3.46 3.46 3.46 3.46 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 15 15 15 15 - 1 12.0 13.5 15.0 13.00 13.00 13.00 17.73 17.73 17.73 17.73 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1 1 1 1 - 1 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 3.30 6.60 9.90 >5.13 >5.13 >5.13 >5.13 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 - 1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total riffle length 60-70%of reach length 5.0 14.0 29.0 11.4 19.2 18.8 29.1 5.1 12
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.014 0.022 0.042 0.013 0.018 0.017 0.025 0.003 12
Pool Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total pool length 30-40%of reach length 10.0 15.0 41.0 10.9 17.7 18.1 25.9 4.6 18
Pool Max depth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.5 1.9 3.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.3 2.3 3.1 0.4 14
Pool Spacing(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 30.1 45.2 60.2 10.0 23.5 58.0 10.9 40.4 42.1 59.8 12.0 16
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17.2 23.0 92.8 17.0 26.4 39.5 16.9 26.6 25.3 35.9 6.0 18
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.8 14.0 40.6 15.8 19.1 24.8 9.2 23.0 25.6 29.8 6.6 20
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.0 2.8 3.5 2.1 2.5 3.3 1.2 2.9 3.3 3.8 0.9 20
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 34.3 48.5 162.4 59.0 75.0 95.0 46.0 73.6 78.7 85.9 11.4 16
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.5 4.5 8.0 2.2 3.5 5.2 2.2 3.4 3.2 4.6 0.8 18
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 - 0.63 0.54
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull - 108 94
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 - 19 35
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification F4 C4 C4 C4
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.8 12.5 3.8 - 3.3 4.4
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 7 25 16.9 - 15.06 15.06
Valley length(ft) - 920 920
Channel Thalweg length(ft) - 1097 1097
Sinuosity(ft) - 1.2 to 1.4 1.19 1.19
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) - 0.0198 0.0201
BF slope(ft/ft) - 0.0198 0.0201
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - 1.1 1.1
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks 70%
Channel Stability or Habitat MetricL I
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank I ERR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8i. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT4 (134 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es)Data I Design I Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min I Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max - Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 1 5 2.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.4 5.1 7.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.4 9.7 16.1 7.0 9.5 12.0 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.2 0.8 0.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 0.5 3 1.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.5 1.8 3.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.26 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12.0 15.0 18.0 13 13 13 14.72 14.72 14.72 14.72 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.4 1.8 2.2 1.8 2.4 3.0 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 - 1
'Bank Height Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.0 1.0 1.1 1 1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total riffle length 50%of reach length 10.0 10.0 18.0 20.0 22.9 22.9 25.9 2.9 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I 0.005 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.015 0.017 0.003 2
Pool Length(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total pool length 50%of reach length 9.0 10.0 15.5 13.8 19.0 19.0 24.2 5.2 2
Pool Max depth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 1.2 2.1 2.2 2.6 3.85 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.1 2
Pool Spacing(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.7 19.1 30.6 20.0 23.0 33.1 46.3 46.3 46.3 46.3 0.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress(competency)lb/f2 N/A 0.02 0.27
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull N/A 7 40
Stream Power(transport capacity) W/m2 N/A 0 2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B/G 4 B4c B4c B4c
Bankfull Velocity(fps) 0.7 18.0 3.5 N/A 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 2 9 5.3 N/A 0.62 0.62
Valley length(ft) 1315 129 130
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1476 134 134
Sinuosity(ft) 1.12 1.1 to 1.3 1.04 1.03
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0241 0.0084 0.015
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0241 0.0084 0.015
3Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) N/A 0.2 0.05
4%of Reach with Eroding Banks N/A
_ _
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1=The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach(added bankfull verification-rare).
3.Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres,which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5.Of value/needed only if then exceeds 3
*Note that the valley length has increased in the proposed alignment.
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8(
Red Barn Mitigation Bank EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 9. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
UT1A(1590 feet) UT1c(738 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool) Cross Section 2(Pool) Cross Section 3(Riffle) Cross Section 4(Riffle) Cross Section 5(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 I MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 I MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
elevation'
Record elevation(datum)used 1043.97 1023.76 1021.58 1018.47 1017.76
Bankfull Width(ft) 11.85 7.57 5.87 6.17 8.92
Floodprone Width(ft) N/A N/A >40.34 >57.36 N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.62 0.55 0.29 0.5 0.57
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.33 0.91 0.47 0.72 1.06
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 7.36 4.14 1.73 3.07 5.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 19.11 13.76 20.24 12.34 15.65
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio N/A N/A >6.87 >9.29 N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
UT2a(1,197 feet) UT2b(1077 feet)
Cross Section 6(Pool) Cross Section 7(Riffle) Cross Section 8(Pool) Cross Section 9(Riffle) Cross Section 10(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 I MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
elevation'
Record elevation(datum)used 1023.50 1019.49 1016.72 1016.16 1014.61
Bankfull Width(ft) 10.76 7.65 9.91 8.57 10.59
Floodprone Width(ft) N/A >53.90 N/A >54.90 N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.73 0.39 1 0.85 0.48 1.00
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.37 0.7 1.47 0.86 2.08
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 7.9 2.95 8.47 4.14 10.56
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.74 19.62 11.66 17.85 10.59
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio N/A >7.04 N/A >6.4 N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1 =Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot
acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with DMS. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history,which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
Red Barn Mitigation Bank EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 9 (continued). Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
UT2c(244 feet) UT3a(1410 feet) UT3b(190 feet)
Cross Section 11 (Riffle) Cross Section 12(Riffle) Cross Section 13(Pool) Cross Section 14(Pool) Cross Section 15(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
elevation
Record elevation(datum)used 1013.38 1070.58 1052.07 1041.94 1034.66
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.24 5.58 8.49 7.59 6.89
Floodprone Width(ft) 41.38 31.01 N/A N/A 24.62
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.42 0.28 0.88 0.89 0.54
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.82 0.51 1.64 1.5 0.77
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.9 1.57 7.5 6.74 3.74
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 22.00 19.93 9.65 8.53 12.76
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.48 5.55 N/A N/A 3.58
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
UT3c(1097 feet) UT4(134 feet)
Cross Section 16(Riffle) I Cross Section 17(Pool) Cross Section 18(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
elevation'
Record elevation(datum)used 1026.46 1020.20 1043.02
Bankfull Width(ft) 7.8 10.21 4.27
Floodprone Width(ft) >40.00 N/A 11.79
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.44 1.25 0.29
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.65 2.46 0.43
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.46 12.74 1.26
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 17.73 8.17 14.72
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >5.13 N/A 2.76
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0
1 =Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot
acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history,which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
Red Barn Mitigation Bank EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT1a (1590 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension nd Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.87 5.87 5.87 5.87 1
Floodprone Width(ft) >40.3 >40.3 >40.3 >40.3 - 1 _
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 - 1
'Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.2 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio >6.87 >6.87 >6.87 >6.87 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 13.4 18.6 18.8 22.8 3.1 10
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.013 0.025 0.024 0.037 0.007 10
Pool Length(ft) 13.5 20.0 20.6 25.8 4.8 10
Pool Max depth(ft) 0.9 1.7 1.6 2.2 0.3 10
Pool Spacing(ft) 29.3 38.1 35.9 50.2 7.8 10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 12.3 26.3 25.3 43.0 7.7 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I__
Radius of Curvature(ft) 12.0 18.0 17.7 23.8 2.9 41
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 2.0 3.1 3.0 4.1 0.5 41 Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or '
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) 46.0 60.9 61.8 73.5 6.5 40
Meander Width Ratio 2.1 4.5 4.3 7.3 1.3 40
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5b
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1590
Sinuosity(ft) 1.2
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0165
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0167
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT1c (738 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5 I
Dimension nd Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft)' >57.4 >57.4 >57.4 >57.4 - 1
, _ '
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.07 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12.34 , 12.34 12.34 12.34 - 1 ,
Entrenchment Ratio >9.29 >9.29 >9.29 >9.29 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 16.2 24.4 23.8 34.0 6.8 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.002 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.0 4 ,
Pool Length(ft) 12.5 19.328 19.4 26.03 5.3 4
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.1 1.4 1.2 2.1 0.4 4
Pool Spacing(ft) 41.0 49.05 50.54 54.10 5.3 4 I
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 29.4 38.66 39.00 45.70 3.8 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Radius of Curvature(ft) 14.300 20.38 21.30 25.70 3.2 13
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 2.3 3.2871 3.4355 4.1452 0.5 13 Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
- profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) 58.5 73.0 73.8 83.2 8.1 11
Meander Width Ratio 4.7 6.24 6.29 7.37 0.6 11 .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 738
Sinuosity(ft) 1.4
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0034
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0031
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT2a (1197 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) >53.9 , >53.9 >53.9 >53.9 - 1 _
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 - 1
-
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 - 1
-
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 19.62 19.62 19.62 19.62 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio >7.04 >7.04 >7.04 >7.04 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 11.5 19.0 17.0 32.2 6.9 10
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.0091 0.0127 0.0123 0.0177 0.0024 10
Pool Length(ft) 10.0 18.9 19.3 28.0 5.6 12
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.2 1.6 1.7 2.4 0.3 11
Pool Spacing(ft) 30.3 43.2 40.6 55.6 8.5 13
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 23.2 34.7 33.85 50.1 6.89 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I__
Radius of Curvature(ft) 11.7 19.06 19.05 24.6 3.077 24
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 1.5195 2.4753 2.474 3.1948 0.399 24 Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) 48.4 66.9 66.85 82.6 9.14 22
Meander Width Ratio 3.013 4.5065 4.3961 6.5065 0.895 22
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1197
Sinuosity(ft) 1.31
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0092
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0091
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT2b (1062 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 - 1
'Floodprone Width(ft) >54.9 >54.9 >54.9 >54.9 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 4.14 4.14 4.14 4.14 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 17.85 17.85 17.85 17.85 - 1
•
Entrenchment Ratio >6.4 >6.4 >6.4 >6.4 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 15.9 28.2 25.3 45.7 9.6 13 I
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.0026 0.0052 0.005 0.0089 0.0018 13
Pool Length(ft) 19.0 23.9 22.6 35.7 4.8 10
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.4 1.7 1.7 2.1 0.2 10
Pool Spacing(ft) 44.5 56.3 57.3 67.0 7.6 10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 23.2 46.38 47.9 62.7 10.76 13
Radius of Curvature(ft) 21.1 26.86 27.6 32.9 3.48 12
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 2.4535 3.1233 3.2093 3.8256 0.404 12 Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) 78.3 102.6 97.65 152.8 17.3 14
Meander Width Ratio 2.6977 5.393 5.5698 7.2907 1.25 13 .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C5
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1062
Sinuosity(ft) 1.26
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0030
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0031
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT2c (244 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 41.4 41.4 41.4 41.4 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 22 22 22 22 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 4.48 4.48 4.48 4.48 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 14.8 23.2 23.9 28.4 4.6 5
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.0028 0.0052 0.0043 0.009 0.0022 5
Pool Length(ft) 14.2 20.8 23.9 24.3 4.6 3
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.7 2.1 2.1 2.5 0.3 3
Pool Spacing(ft) 41.0 45.9 47.6 49.2 3.5 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5c
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 244
Sinuosity(ft) 1.01
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0030
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0030
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT3a (1410 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 31.0 31.0 31.0 ,i 31.0 - 1 _ _ _
,Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.57 1.57 1.57 1.57 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 19.93 19.93 19.93 , 19.93 - 1 _ _ _
Entrenchment Ratio 5.55 5.55 5.55 5.55 - 1 ,
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 12.5 17.9 17.5 27.6 4.1 11 I ,
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.021 0.030 0.030 0.042 0.0056 11
Pool Length(ft) 6.7 11.0 10.8 15.1 3.0 12
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.4 1.8 1.8 2.3 0.3 12
Pool Spacing(ft) 21.5 29.8 29.5 45.4 6.2 10
•
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 9 14.1 13.75 20.9 2.825 12
Radius of Curvature(ft) 18.1 24.09 28.1 28.1 4.43 13
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 3.2321 4.3018 5.0179 5.0179 0.79 13 Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) 47.4 78.2 79.65 132.6 26.157 14
Meander Width Ratio 1.6071 2.5179 2.4554 3.7321 0.5 12 .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B4
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1410
Sinuosity(ft) 1.01
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0256
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0258
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10g. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT3b (190 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12.76 12.76 12.76 12.76 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 3.58 3.58 3.58 3.58 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 8.9 14.9 15.0 21.2 4.3 6
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.022 0.0293 0.0297 0.0379 0.0052 6
Pool Length(ft) 14.7 16.5 16.2 20.3 1.8 6
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.7 2.1 2.0 2.9 0.4 6
Pool Spacing(ft) 15.4 31.6 33.7 45.0 9.9 6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B4c
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 190
Sinuosity(ft) 1.04
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0159
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0153
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10h. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT3c (1097 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) >40.0 >40.0 >40.0 >40.0 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 - 1
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.46 3.46 3.46 3.46 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 17.73 17.73 17.73 17.73 - 1
•
Entrenchment Ratio >5.13 >5.13 >5.13 >5.13 - 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 11.4 19.2 18.8 29.1 5.1 12 I
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.0133 0.0184 0.0172 0.0254 0.0035 12
Pool Length(ft) 10.9 17.7 18.1 25.9 4.6 18
Pool Max depth(ft) 1.6 2.3 2.3 3.1 0.4 14
Pool Spacing(ft) 10.9 40.4 42.1 59.8 12.0 16
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 16.9 26.62 25.3 35.9 6 18
Radius of Curvature(ft) 9.2 23 25.55 29.8 6.649 20
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 1.1795 2.9487 3.2756 3.8205 0.85 20 Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) 46 73.61 78.65 85.9 11.44 16
Meander Width Ratio 2.1667 3.4128 3.2436 4.6026 0.77 18 .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C4
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 1097
Sinuosity(ft) 1.19
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0201
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0201
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 10i. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site - UT4 (134 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension and Substrate-Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 - 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 11.79 11.79 11.79 11.79 - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 - 1 ,
1Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 - 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.26 - 1
Width/Depth Ratio 14.72 14.72 14.72 14.72 - 1
Entrenchment Ratio 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 - 1 ,
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 20.0 22.9 22.9 25.9 2.9 2 I
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.0123 0.0149 0.0149 0.0174 0.0026 2
Pool Length(ft) 13.8 19.0 19.0 24.2 5.2 2
Pool Max depth(ft) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.1 2
Pool Spacing(ft) 46.3 46.3 46.3 46.3 0.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or
profile data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A .
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B4c
Channel Thalweg length(ft) 134
Sinuosity(ft) 1.03
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0152
BF slope(ft/ft) 0.0151
3Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S°A)
3SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
3d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/
2%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNINex
Red Barn Mitigation Bank [EPR RESTORATION
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 - Sta. 10+00 - 15+00
1060
As-Built Thalweg-MVO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1055
1050
1045
_
Begin UT1a
_v XS1 -
"' 1040
1035 - 1
1030 •
— • -
1025
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 - Sta. 15+00 - 20+00
1050
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1045
1040 —
--- 1035
0
r
> _
a,
LT' 1030 -
1025
1020 • •
1015
15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 - Sta. 20+00 - 25+00
1040
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank • Cross Sections Water Surface
1035
1030
1025
•
fop -
a) XS2
LT' 1020 "" - --
XS3
1015
1010
1005
20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 - Sta. 25+00 - 30+00
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
1020 — —
V
v
LL' 1015 End UT1a • —
Begin UT1b
1010
1005
1000
25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 - Sta. 30+00 - 35+00
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
Culvert Crossing
-- 1020 — -
w End UT1b •
XS4
1015
Begin UT1c
1010
1005 i •
1000
30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 - Sta. 35+00 - 38+66
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MVO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
1020 End UT1c
4—
u
LT' 1015 XS5
1010 —
1005 •
•
1000
35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT2 - Sta. 10+00 - 15+00
1045
As-Built Thalweg-MVO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1040
1035
-s
-- 1030 Begin UT2a
,44
ca
a,
T 1025
1020 XS6 _
1015 • —
1010
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT2 - Sta. 15+00 - 20+00
1040
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1035
1030
1025
O _
L' 1020
XS7
1015
1010 •
1005
15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT2 - Sta. 20+00 - 25+00
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank • Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
1020
ra
-----
LT' 1015
XS8
End UT2a XS9
Begin UT2b
1010
1005 • •
1000
20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT2 - Sta. 25+00 - 30+00
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
Culvert Crossing Bedrock Outcrop
1020
'
1015 • ®-----
XS10
1010 —
1005 •
1000
25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT2 - Sta. 30+00 - 35+00
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
-- 1020 —
c
0
v
LT-' 1015 —
1010 —
1 XS11
End UT2b
Begin UT2c
1005 —
1000
30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING&
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT2 - Sta. 35+00 - 35+15
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
1020
0
v
u' 1015 •
1010
End UT2c
1005 •
1000
35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT3 - Sta. 10+00 - 15+00
1085
As-Built Thalweg-MVO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1080
Begin UT3a
1075 6 —
1070 v''
,44
o I XS12
a) -
1065 '
1060 - - y
1055 •
• •
1050
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT3 - Sta. 15+00 - 20+00
1070
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1065
1060
V "
1055 -- Culvert Crossing
ra
0
a,
LT' 1050
XS13
1045 —
1040 -
1035
15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT3 - Sta. 20+00 - 25+00
1060 —
1055 As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 — Right Bank Left Bank INCross Sections Water Surface
1050
1045
4
ra
ra
a,
LT' 1040
XS14
1035
XS15
End UT3a
1030 Begin UT3b
1025
20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT3 - Sta. 25+00 - 30+00
1050
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1045
1040
1035 .
i
1030 End UT3b ..
Begin UT3c
1025
1020 •
1015
25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT3 - Sta. 30+00 - 35+00
1040
As-Built Thalweg-MYO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1035
1030 — —
1025 ■ _
XS16 --
_v
L' 1020
1015 —
1010 —
1005
30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT3 - Sta. 35+00 - 37+94
1035
As-Built Thalweg-MVO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank ■ Cross Sections Water Surface
1030
1025
— 1020
0
"' 1015 XS17
-
1010 — t
End UT3c
Begin UT3d End UT3d
1005
1000
35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile - Baseline (May 2020)
UT4 - Sta. 10+00 - 11+00
1060
As-Built Thalweg-MVO 2020 Right Bank Left Bank • Cross Sections Water Surface
1055
Begin UT4
1050
1045 End UT4
LI' 1040 XS18
1035 -
1030 •
1025
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
Stationing(ft)
Appendix D ECOSYSTEM
Red Barn Mitigation Bank PLANNING&
g EPR RESTORATION
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS1-UT1a
Station 11+87-Pool
iNs q •A`� .r'.' _ '..:yw' as _ aa 3..� *'`'" - : xs �, f G' ,0- , .• F -T" ' xk sr.� 1.'q_ r . .
-'a
4;'' Or'' ,,-"-- -,,. ' .ozit-'rt''';------4tie"Pfe!:.".1.--‘•
,-.- ----, i,'*, lc;:.,,- .'' ' ,-
•r 'CAE y = ,
t # '.' "r, ,as m., .fi d '4 v;l^:
< as s -`-:a ,w"
.tea:^'. ��.i � ; �rt � 4. g, -_. e;,,,- "` , .._ Z 4
x` 7. Y/f x ' � "' , °:.t4 !._ i� ter- `-
. ,,,,.X �' M - i F 'may k f f Y s k Z
ti9�Rm : 7 { .,. ^.S �� � yY.: ?. ry1Gt � ",3:: i_4MI
XS1 •looking upstream XS1 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) ( ( , ( ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width ft Elevation ft Width ft ft ft Ratio
1043.97 7.36 11.85 N/A N/A 1.33 0.62 19.11 N/A 1.0
XS1 Pool - 11+87
1050
As-Built-May 2020
1049
— — — Bankfull
1048
1047
1046
c
1045
as
v
LT' 1044 — — — —
1043
1042
1041
1040
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS2-UTla
Station 20+33-Pool
S 4. ,mow r ,-, C. der: w '' y.w,t,�- _ "* "
a qr-
`,. „`(- r `, �- ram` :"` £ .e _ -.:y �.1 �, -
Ag'x'4^ ip'-:,;, 7: '-', "` .`•-c � 3 � s.
L- 4 , ,, a ., tt,f ,max .�. .,r .x
r
ott,11..6. ',,..., , • ,,(.. •-,'.. ,' ' .n . v•'. n,'I,-..:, '..:..'' .1,,,..:ii.A .6. •'6. '',''''.''.Ple•'''.''''t:..1.l'''' ''.7,•:i.,%•••,.1WP, :6-.,
XS2 looking upstream XS2 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( 2) ( , (ft) W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width(ft) Elevation ft Width (ft) (ft) Ratio
1023.76 4.14 7.57 N/A N/A 0.91 0.55 13.76 N/A 1.0
XS2 Pool - 20+33
1029
As-Built-May 2020
1028
— — — Bankfull
1027
1026
1025
c
1024
ra
l —
"' 1023 if
1022
1021
1020
1019
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS3-Una
Station 22+60 Riffle
y; � x
.r wr K ....'
_.22
j sue )` "qs } 1 $''^$`' eb2 R �m -
ofirs-lit r.-1-.-tt• ' -,- •10.
.z y$a -Y f;t1. u .', ) s 7 . •t., �
4
. .
XS3 looking upstream XS3 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) (ft) (ft)
(ft)
W/D Ratio ER
Elevation ft Area ft Width(ft) ElevationWidth(ft) Ratio
1021.58 1.73 5.87 1022.05 >40.34 0.47 0.29 20.24 >6.87 1.0
XS3 Riffle- 22+60
1027
As-Built-May 2020
1026 — — — Floodprone
- - - Bankfull
1025
1024
1023
c
1022 - - - •
co
v
L' 1021
1020
1019
1018
1017
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS4-UT1b
Station 33+64-Riffle
� � x c, .,.�., a tee-.� e= v
- ! 44:- ..y 'a ,Z. - N fit . _ r -�. L T 4' mot
r''- . ,,, . ' Yd,# d - ; to
-,4.-,'''' ..,.: _ Itt*.f- ,. -4i.,*-4.16k:-.44s1, _..‘-,:: '-'''S"-i'*477"..-:: t ---:' 4_1'_ , 7,-A
s
� ",, a 1 J nl !' ,ate. x�• 'a':; <
XS4 looking upstream XS4 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) (ft)
( , ( (ft)
W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft WidthElevation ft Width ft ftRatio
1018.47 3.07 6.17 1019.19 >57.36 0.72 0.5 12.34 >9.29 1.0
XS4 Riffle - 33+64
As-Built-
1024
May 2020
1023 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1022
1021
1020
•° 1019 _.0°°°.4'
......--.....\\J..'
w 1018
1017
1016
1015
1014
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS5 UT1b
Station 36+40-Pool
� '
a ' �''' - )ram"` '` t ��. 4,
awe t
:' -, aV -f''art ' '. , ,d�a's; R'p' x
Sri - '
_ _ � Sys
XS5 looking upstream XS5 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) (ft)
( , (ft)
(ft)
w/o Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft WidthElevation ft Width ftRatio
1017.76 5.1 8.92 N/A N/A 1.06 0.57 15.65 N/A 1.0
XS5 Pool - 36+40
1023
As-Built-May 2020
1022
— — — Bankfull
1021
1020
1019
o 1018
co
a)
"' 1017
1016
1015
1014
1013
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS6-UT2a
Station 14+74-Pool
? 'kfr. y �,
4.'� v� - t t°.. hS yam -` ' } c}x„ i�,$f" ,.,' � Pc ''. -
- 5
J
XS6 looking downstream XS6 looking upstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Bank Height
( Z) ( ( , ( ( W/D Ratio ER
ft Width ft Elevation ft Width ft ft ft Depth
Ratio
1023.5 7.9 10.76 N/A N/A 1.37 0.73 14.74
Elevation(ft) Area
N/A 1.0
XS6 Pool - 14+74
1029
As-Built-May 2020
1028
— — — Bankfull
1027
1026
1025
I1024
1023
1022
1021
1020
1019
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS7-UT2a
Station 19+16-Riffle
'� • air' ,+' " '�',rt.� 2' �k k , '-''' '''� ' -„�
.� �'s x t`.w ' ''3' ,sy. ti' y „y 5`.tF'" -�"'casv� F k i= ,_
4 ttom�,, - �
'•.s" 44,E t'• +may ,x f .¢ 'Afg. i. v
. ,-.,,,,` -,.Wi' = .vim " ti,� e
a e'
, tea.- �; 1111. - q , Y� E ; '.
j� 1 1 q yr. .i
XS7 looking upstream XS7 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( 2) ( , ( ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width(ft) Elevation ft Width ft ft ft) Ratio
1019.49 2.95 7.65 1020.19 >53.90 0.7 0.39 19.62 >7.04 1.0
XS7 Riffle - 19+16
1025
As-Built-May 2020
1024 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1023
1022
1021
c ---=----_._.__,__._._._._______x\y..______________,_—
°
1020
ra
a,
"' 1019
1018
1017
1016
1015
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS8-UT2b
Station 22+44 Pool
�•,--......E-, s ---,_
f_ s,
s -a
-, _ -''' , ::'.-- ---,-;,.. .,',3-7.-1-.N,i4'-.:MIt.- -,:fxif •*-17-r.,',-;$.. .#-,11'.`,', 1;x•kii,•5'Z '47-**';',': . -4.k14"-- '---,- ---,-1'-,-,: : _-,
.-• ..R
T
bE
.. --- _ . - �� 40-i;ts Y. w,
XS8 looking upstream XS8 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) ( (ft) (ft)
(ft)
W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width ft ElevationWidth(ft) Ratio
1016.72 8.47 9.91 N/A N/A 1.47 0.85 11.66 N/A 1.0
XS8 Pool - 22+44
1022
As-Built-May 2020
1021 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1020
1019
1018
c
1017
as
v
"I 1016
1015
1014
1013
1012
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance(ft)

Cross Section XS9-UT2b
Plot- Baseline
Station 24+41-Riffle
kk
^ I 1,
I I �� �,,.+ r
4;Yr� '' r
�u S _"" iv"&sue-. 0 ''
'' �i - - '` a gam. ..' ' i z& --- :`,x - " m°.
",11k
,5.,.. . `� , *.'1.'� ,4 ` s ) 1 is m z � � r"..' ' f.��t"w'@ a'� �.s"S.v j'
XS9 looking upstream XS9 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Dept-
(ft)Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) (ft)
, (ft)
w/o Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width(ft) Elevation ft Width(ft) Ratio
1016.16 4.14 8.57 1017.02 >54.90 0.86 0.48 17.85 >6.4 1.0
As-Built-
XS9 Riffle- 24+41
1021
May 2020
1020 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1019
1018
1017
c
•° 1016
co
ai
LT' 1015
1014
1013
1012
1011
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS10-UT2b
Station 29+27-Pool
S t
�� 43. --I ,a- may
-tea �^
'` Q �`
i
,,w.fIL- -..0',1',7,'gc,,,,pgiz,‘,'--;",-Aw' ' :',;—*N„..-...-'4"-:m„--"f
„.. ...„. ....,,,.........,.....,-„,,-.,.....„,, „,:. 4.-:
�`
T '',,,,.-,..*A*34,-;"-:--.. r •= ^ `•"$ �i 11 4 t; .fie, s�
XS10 looking upstream XS10 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Meanf Bank Height
( ) ( , Width ft ( ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ftZ Width(ft) Elevation ft ft t Depth
Ratio
1014.61 10.56 10.59 N/A N/A 2.08 1.0 10.59 N/A 1.0
XS10 Pool - 29+27
1020
As-Built-May 2020
1019
— — — Bankfull
1018
1017
/
1016
c
1015
co
ai
"' 1014
1013
1012
1011
1010
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS11-UT2c
Station 32+53-Riffle
a ��� "$' n e'er„ - ' at - .-,= -,� � 'zr. .�Tx .y"
- z
s �
X511 looking upstream XS11 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) ( , W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width(ft) Elevation ft Width(ft) (ft) (ft) Ratio
1013.38 3.9 9.24 1014.2 41.38 0.82 0.42 22 4.48 1.0
XS11 Riffle-32+53
1020
As-Built-May 2020
1019 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1018
1017
1016
I :::: _
1013
1012
1011
1010
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS12-UT3a
Station 11+20-Riffle
4y
- _ . .' s � `• ,' ...
71i;7!1'2-.7.'-' '_.:, ' •W''''''W;t14-:*0.. *7-;t77 Z2.4 ''''''.`*2..!'f'. 1:::Tc''''''.T.;','''''' • :- :.'s--,,' `7---'4:--','-'-''''''' ' -4';':'''''''
XS12 looking upstream XS12 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( ) ( , Width ( (ft)
W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ftZ Width(ft) Elevation ft ft ftRatio
1070.58 1.57 5.58 1071.09 31.01 0.51 0.28 19.93 5.55 1.0
XS12 Riffle- 11+20
1076
As-Built-May 2020
1075 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1074
1073
1072
c
1071 ' — — —
co
ai
L' 1070
1069
1068
1067
1066
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS13-UT3a
Station 17+81-Pool
1 ,._- ,�
f.
;
a �� :x�
Y{
,i . r k`"ky > �d t l T ha '. N l" a �"
3 a 14
,��a ti
4,ir--itz '-- ''— -4111P-,:„.,4.. ,;--4.--!.---;, ',- -1,'- --of•--.' , .-.440
_`i At �s;2
!It
1,
X513 looking upstream X513 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone
(Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area(ft2) Width(ft)
Elevation(ft)
Width ft ft (ft) Ratio
1052.07 7.5 8.49 N/A N/A 1.64 0.88 9.65 N/A 1.0
XS13 Pool - 17+81
1058
As-Built-May 2020
1057
— — — Bankfull
1056
1055
1054
...........---7V
c
1053
v
"' 1052
1051
1050
1049
1048
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS14-UT3a
Station 21+94-Pool
-,
•
-.
- r s � � `-r�..
-
�` „ �.r may,a,a-- � �z -
3� r
. • � - ,c e+x
a ✓ � r. • �r & z , ���.,
•
XS14 looking upstream X514 looking downstream
Bank Height
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean( Depth
( ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ftZ) (Width ft (
Elevation ft, Width ft ft ft Ratio
1041.94 6.74 7.59 N/A N/A 1.5 0.89 8.53 N/A 1.0
XS14 Pool - 21+94
1048
As-Built-May 2020
1047 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1046
1045
1044
I1043
1042
1041
1040
1039
1038
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance(ft)

Cross - Baseline
XS15-UTb
StationSection 24+12 Plot3-Riffle
F i Ai—
� ,.- ' per, +° _ s i' ' "°,. �z,'. .,� -
, i
am: ,� a 4 r' . $�g y -. �', .a _
it, 1�r ,� Sw'". :r�4+ "f� "�: s�a '�`"�a c �� ..�t z� s�� � � ,r1 A�o. >
�` L j '� r
4100
} 'fie ,� ;.�T e J y, ""•` Y'
. `
.d g - �. .4
X515 looking upstream X515 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean(ft)Depth Bank Height
( Z) ( ( , ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width ft Elevation ft Width ft ftRatio
1034.66 3.74 6.89 1035.43 24.62 0.77 0.54 12.76 3.58 1.0
XS15 Riffle 24+12
1041
As-Built-May 2020
1040 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1039
1038
1037
c
•° 1036
v
W 1035
1034
1033
1032
1031
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance(ft)

Cross Section t Ba see line
.-;l _ h� 'sue `�:;: Z',sa_ s "_ N
pl
4.
;[z z:'.gyp$# "' s IP f R ,_,. 7,s— v w '�%'" ,'n aa- ``
Y.
$ S°T &
t.
�, „:4', y i. `�'. .! - - 6 as
4Y gyp. r'.... . - '4 '�< .:il� .�
XS16 looking upstream X516 looking downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) ( ( , (ft)
(ft)
W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area ft Width ft Elevation ft Width(ft) Ratio
1026.46 3.46 7.8 1027.11 >40.00 0.65 0.44 17.73 >5.13 1.0
As-Built-
XS16 Riffle 31+49
1032
May 2020
1031 — — — Floodprone
— — — Bankfull
1030
1029
1028
I ::::
1025
1024
1023
1022
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance(ft)

Cross Section PlotUT3c- Baseline
Station 34+91-Pool
I: Eder ,'s a % " 'rcx ' F
R
}" w ,.,_ :ram ss+ :-` -- , ' ,-' '' }u _ .+t"'
�v� ^h � E
:'-:;:77,''',.,;,-.4*%00::.-‘,.--''''' ,,,.' '''' '-'-:..:.'.w044*f-4`— ;'—'.' "---.:t_., ;:::, ------'
',--°:,,,=.41:0,--_, _
Zc 'k e Y
�� j� '„ 4 Ap fie
• `r --_ ter " '� ''' i c
- - :' -q '' w'h -- . a ° '.�2" _ -•,yam `-
+6tmfp
XS17 looking upstream XS17 looking downstream
Bankfull
(Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( ( , ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation(ft) Area(ft2)
Width ft Elevation ft Width ft ft ft Ratio
1020.2 12.74 10.21 N/A N/A 2.46 1.25 8.17 N/A 1.0
XS17 Pool 34+91
1025
As-Built-May 2020
1024
— — — Bankfull
1023
1022
1021 —
c
1020
as
ai
"' 1019
1018
1017 - -
1016
1015
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance(ft)

Cross Section Plot- Baseline
XS18-UT
4
Station 10+73-Riffle
�� ,
o-
� � s'a e� �, ,�,,w� t .� �'� � � ma, s
T,
` 2,..�-';- g' y` ter jw "�°" ;yam ,. 11;*" y 7 -
,. am_--fr, .'�,y $ ' � �� � �� �;sd;�''- ,�` '�"+ SSA $�� � ,,
s�.. � -*r vo-q-� ' .s ew` w`�s' -�
gyp- • - +�
--, -' .....sTrierr..age ' - .
r it ;
€T ' '`.� ,,, t ;f t fit' ^' _
r x
X518 looking upstream X518 loo4."*A1111111111111Lik- king downstream
Bankfull Bankfull Bankfull Floodprone Floodprone Max Depth Mean Depth Bank Height
( Z) ( ( , ( ( W/D Ratio ER
Elevation ft Area ft Width ft Elevation ft Width ft ft ft Ratio
1043.02 1.26 4.27 1043.45 11.79 0.43 0.29 14.72 2.76 1.0
As
Flo
XS18 Riffle 10+73
1049
Built May 2020
1048 - - - odprone
— — — Bankfull
1047
1046
1045
r....................................e.7:
c
o 1044
frs
"' 1043
1042
1041
1040
1039
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance(ft)

Appendix E
As-Built Plan Drawings
Conservation Easement Recorded Plat

P &-c-NS STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET TOTAL
NO
1
,� CNC 092 1 20,
eak
doi
Ale*Aft ` prof
4 � 1 SURRY COUNTY
PROJ�_ �l 1" ezo 4���
36`29'30.53"N ..A�
:,.38'20.67"W ' �,gurtA ��/_40
ill�Vpril
LOCATION: TIMELESS TRAIL, MOUNT AIRY, NC
i ie Dr 44%11111. 4s I- I Z 4
-IINIK ,l l‘ - 'id JI\111 TYPE OF WORK: RECORD DRAWINGS
CO< ‘' \ \ / N (. \
VICINITY MAP BEGIN UT1
♦ / STA. 10+00.00
Z X= 1 51 7667.8010
SHEET 4 SHEET 3 Y= 1002003.0200
Q
INDEX OF SHEETS 1
I--- TITLE SHEET
i`
o4 2--- STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
T GENERAL NOTES �12 AlkOk
j~I 3-20... PLAN AND PROFILE Jo
-‘5)el it I
< I ;y z
T s5 �Fj) I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED
8
V FFT PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH
E
BEGIN UT2 CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY DATA SHOWN
STA. 10+00.00 WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE
X= 1 51 8517.9910 AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
SHEETY= 1000893.9280 CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL
END UT2 �7 sN DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS-BUILT
2 STA. 35+34.03 ' %_tillt4WP.,
� CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
` WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER,
�vw� - ! AND SEAL THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 2020.
z ,„, 70
(( II11
END UT 1 � � `=D:t0:SS/p� 4'y %
STA. 38+75.06 .et` '�• a
.� DAVID S. TURNER, P.L S. #L-4551 = R _ =
�/ FT/9 BEGIN UT4 :r L-4551SEAL �:
STA. 10+00.00
SS syEET X= 1518168.6980
�Q 9y0 ��0 �'
CO F r> Y= 999763.9700 V7• • ,S U R . • �.`
STA. 38+I04.04 �� SyEET�6 s ''iiGiO S .�13��\\�
yEFT is
!!!l1 1 1 1 4 4111
0 BEGIN UT3
iristsyF STA. 10+00.00
T i T FT�� X = 1519131.7810
I..L.1 END UT4 Y= 99941 2.8390
XSTA. 1 1 +47.48
H ` J
(...) GRAPHIC SCALES 1 r REVISIONS PREPARED FOR: 1 N. PROJECT ENGINEER
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. IAPPROV. DATE
j 2 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 \N CA Rp
■ 1 . 1_ O 40
2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 I '., I Ci .fl�Oc Ec, `�y���' by
PLANS _ Q 's+
Jain:. Date:' c09.1�
0 20 1 O 0 20 40 / SUMMER 2020 CIDNEY
SONG NEER _ JEA1�:09:3 -� '00'
` 1 i 11 US Army Corps COMPLETION DATE. 043187
PROFILE(HORIZONTAL) C�jV
of Engineers® ,,,0/o cINE- \�-) '
NFYII IJI I IJT\,.
i 5 2.5 0 5 10 ,,
`1�11�
PROFILE(VERTICAL) P.E.
f` J!, `SIGNATURE:
J

C
STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS CPR00J9E2T#1�SHEE2TN J
o....% aROCK J-HOOK —SF— SAFETY FENCE SYMBOLOGY /
MONITORING FEATURES NOTES
m=oR, ROCK VANE 9 -TP— TAPE FENCE
COFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE OV — I I I— SILT FENCE VP VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
AROCK CROSS VANE xV m CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONITORING GAUGE
—- 20—- EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR PHOTO POINT
— TEMPORARY SILT CHECK
ROOT WAD
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR xa•_•_•_•_ MONITORING CROSS SECTION
0 GRADE CONTROL LOG J-HOOK 9 — 20— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR ASBUILT FEATURES
® LOG VANE Lv — 21 — PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR ENNI
�.�9 ASBUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
Mil LOG STEP Ls ------- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
I I I 1 ROCK STEP — — - BANKFULL BENCH(GRADE)
C ASBUILT TOE WOOD
Rs
/\ LOG CROSS VANE Xv — — • PROPERTY LINE
' CONSTRUCTED CASCADE cc ACCESS ROAD
r 10+00
7. ' CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE cR -1- STREAM THALWEG
BOULDER CLUSTER STREAM TOP OF 8,,o,'"WAOR.
LOG ROLLER LR �. FOOT BRIDGE
-W0 `� TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
ji GRADE CONTROL WOODY RIFFLE
�h��(I�� I-I PERMANENT FORD STREAM CROSSING
® TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
TOEWOOD WITH GEOLIFT O TREE REMOVAL
SOD MATS sM { TREE PROTECTION
!i:i:i:i'i GEOLIFT
DEBRIS JAM DJ-T# li CHANNEL FILL
I DITCH PLUG
z SINGLE WING DEFLECTOR Q ////
GRADE BANK 2:1 OR FLATTER
CI
a DOUBLE WING DEFLECTOR D� .-=: EXISTING WETLANDS
m'
In
a
m'
**NOTE:ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT
J
S
th GENERAL NOTES
5 0011nliuu,,hill
1.CONSTRUCTION WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL 2020. �N CA RO /' ,
O `I �d4eF�SS! . t�a6yaaneyJones
a 2.TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING,PLLC �- Da • .U9.14Tjns9-04'00'
/ IN MAY 2020. J®n SEAL
z
m 3.ASBUILT SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING,PLLC IN MAY 2020. = 043187
z
0
F �%C'j FHG I NE��
2 z �NFY J. J��
ce
0
Si REVISIONS ( It PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 t PROJECT ENGINEER 1
O NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O• 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20
r RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE PLANNING &
/o SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION
Noz 1150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
�"0� CARY,NC 27511
m,xs, — — .1k. J
J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

CPRo092 )(SHEET)(SHEE3 NO,
LOG ROLLER ADDED J
x PLAN /
<�� x X x
X�XP' '
c ` X x x PROFILE
TOE WOOD INSTALLED —X•;: ® 1�(k`L �1 CE X�x
INSTEAD OF LOG VANE X—X 6 X Al pir �� --"--- NO
1�
IS,X --- .11111"°°. ---- - 11110-::--- -- -- .
.... ___--- - i-oas...
O21/
Q ;e i , -- _ --ii I �0 ^ 00 ,����I�ll��,i�! \' \\ C A l i i
�,� I / �� ,. _ ' �� ` \ �� , � � xQ) ,1 s ,x CIO Sp.i /ri;esed by
♦4 a
T
/.%; ' ..+�_ 7 ,�'t ,.,`/:9
+ ...." --' ry' ,,�,9;;J, ,�,. '.kk s'�. Lip lir '`Y l 1 } y i -�N 1 �� Jim J D 099.1
4 r: ,EAL16:1 : -04200'
1 // i,? � � x� ; �..�fi' _ bl\ i `°r•� �' \ �" ��� / .., ` ��" = 043187 =
e;� I � � 11 I /AOq1 1 / • . — — ——, U �' FHGINE��
44, MO f
/ - __ .....,,, _ __ _ Z170 I-
..
'' �� e 9b01 z�l •:� Z506
xI _ . �� i. x
r
BEGIN UT 1
STA.10+00.00 CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE INSTALLED 20 10 0 20 40
INSTEAD OF LOG ROLLERS I.
I"�I 1
■ SCALE(FT)
UT1
8• 1,050 -4�3l IL-17Z^f ILr M—1 .
m
O I-
_ W
w
a =
¢i � W
m
m 1,040 0 .
th
o _
u 1111111111 1111111ln 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 1111111111 IIIII ....■....■..MIMI
/
ro 1,030 .■-ESIGN PROFILE
z'
0
a
0
F
2
z'
m 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
0
�i REVISIONS t PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20
O RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PLANNING &
SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noe I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
'14 CARY,NC 27511
m�� J`
J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

(PROJECT# J
)(SHEEN NO,
J
BEDROCK OUTCROP /
PLAN 1
CONSTRUCTED
STEAD OF WOODY REFFLEALLED PROFILE
INSTEAD
Artp*Iortithatiffi„. —6 ...
—x 6 x____ x� ,�,u11CiAl ,,,
iqt p941;,/,roed by
c,�n - ` , c _s i care,
•
0� ,,� n g Date: 0.094
Q3— q1L. $Eg§:13: 3 4'0(e-
— —�� ��-- I S y<in,F = 043187
ju �Di4. I r Zp Sy
I r o o F
. ,s,
,,,4,,,,,
�� 11 ..o�' ���� ,� p `��. is.. N .,�� rs �---, /.0 FNCIrJE�� <�
�' i o o .%`�'"^fib'�h' 1 ,, ��e..i� ^� / '�"° .r .>', . i/i /�/�C`�' ������
wki.
iN,
�- Off �. :~©E -. �„ ���, m f % % `�` �"11 �� , 4 V N
\ � I• VlIP y• v�� \ f�i1'�YE�' � :,, use� a <� �J yu ero�b y� I' LOG STEP
a��� r v�,�, NOT INSTALLED
I I I .aim
�11111 I "..
1 z
If
// 1029 j-1-
------_, °
x x x
' X
x� X�_ X—L��1x - X X 3�X XTk_X X x x X�X�
LOG STEP Allfer 0 C I?'
NOT INSTALLED
LOG STEP NOT INSTALLED —
20 10 0 20 40
111111111
SCALE(FT)
UT1
III
o
1,035 IIIor) LO•�� I
o
1 w III 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 w
EL2 . _
a w m co
111111111111 ■■■ - • w
.�- ��Mr
to
/ J iii ��■..■.�__ _— _ _ J . J
I- 2 iii ������� ����II -- - P .1i ■■■ _
1,030 U •... —� ,� . : : : : : •: : v -
a Q 111 , —, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,
Q .
Z CCI
5 --
0 11 -—
m
1,025
ii
IILT-PROF1L.II-..�
m 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
0
xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1( PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
7
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
m RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
No EPR RESTORATION
OW
Noz 1150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
�"I4 CARY,NC 27511
J mixs1
J LICENSE#P-1 182 J

25 „I
,,• t)t i1 /
• Z (PR00J9E2cT)(SHEET No)
/r'
PLAN /
PROFILE
FLOG INSTALLED VANE
614, TOEINST WOODEAD OF /
/ 11111466-'''''e LOG ROLLERS NOT INSTALLED40
, 0
I
e ,
1022
-
- cv
. ,-- 0
\\\.\\\: \A C A Ro0,
/ 1. ,,. rn
-1 Ci, cc , -
.1\\'' .1-'',4-•"1.0t: SG1 , ,/ "'sr ',' 4, -- 0) ,„. %F--- lne4yCidneylones
',.,.,,,,,,..._ ,aiii • 10,4.. r\Q,
22+On141.6 14 05-04'00
(........, „.,......= (It qt,,..t.i
.•41 ,JOn s- ,,EAL -
.,.-.
1 1 ‘k.'k k 11,11111* ,_-=_,-------:
-
-4-v.,. -,0001'7, —..,--- :::A111' 4- #44;;', ,,0,‘ ,,,,, ..t• , .:N.,
--
, 4,.•.,i i i i.....,.. ,.•',... ......_:.._.--...,,,,-‘-• ',, c51- C-,, I •''7-.11111111M''''s \ \Si\ '''0,4111 —''' ..8, 47 Y' N,.- 0 i _I ''7,C) (''/VGIN c
• ,• ---`,.,,e 0: //,,,, Y J• ,,,,\\\\
Neriusw-•
LOG VAN. \ "•-""' . ..a.....40:7
Silill - 44,7;
b .\ NOT IN ALLED
leg *-74
------)(
VP2 .
:
-------___ ____ 42
20 10 0 20 40
\ 4c' ,.,
Z 1111111
0 11
SCALE(FT)
\ \ ., i ,,._______4--„,,
1111111 \ . ,
UT I
—DESIGN PROFILE --OFlitGN WAS H GI-FR F FVATIII \I THAN FXISTJNG GROI IND
6 1 025 PIWFILE ADJUSTED 0 AVOID FILL.
o ,
m L9
o I'71-] j 11111111111111111111 -
I
1 w4J
In W !xi
a
1 co
nal
to
< L.LI
mi z !I
ce = — —
/
1 020
____ -00-1.1.0. —Pr -.•71"114.1,1210.10.**
5 ci . . . I I
m '
im a --. .= H< I -
/ 2 1 -...— •§
(f)
0
/
0
0
a
o
• 1,015
m
•
z1
—AS-BUILT PROFILE
?t'
O -
iz
ct
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
i
0
(i.d
' •
x REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: •I PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER
1
SI NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
o
0 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PLANNING &
a SURRY COUNTY, NC
No EPR RESTORATION 11
ow
c:(3z 1 1 50 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
slt4 CARY,NC 27511
LICENSE#P-1182
oceN....

CPRo092 J T (SHEE6J
T NO,
cE X X x-®— x � PLAN 7
X X CE
X X 10 k PROFILE
LOG VANE 102° 20
NOT INSTALLED k
1020 28+00Z
Q
27+00 29X
b
_ ®2 uun iull// ^ _ /& lr
1 • \ H CA Q� ally,/
ty signed� _6 �h ' 2 00° :. / 3� _ CL Es 'crlhones
SEALD16{5,:O06 0249.14
30 y J ' 04'00'
.
„ �. Ci = 043187
NAO
_ _
. Q rZn a ni'ii• o\`\\
c
OZOL o
x x gillsx x x " x ^ x n
x x x x x-®-->
x- ----(4§)-- p6
x--
20 10 0 20 40
111111111
SCALE(FT)
UT1
I
Z 1,025
In —DESIGN PROFILE
W
•
W
ce •
:U : : : : : •: : : : : : :
1020 m ,
a ¢ � ^ — ~ -
g 7 _ 2z g
a
0
o —AS-BUILT PROFIL
/
I1,015
z'
m 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00
0
ili
Xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1 PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
a SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
NO I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
s"0E- CARY,NC 27511
m�N, — — J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

\+ I I I r (PROJECT))(SHEET NO,
092 7 J
\+ ! o X ,r PLAN /
\ _ \ PROFILE
1 ----_____ \
,.-----,x, ,______ Ak \ _, \C- - ,
P
ra
24"HDPE —�
INV= 1019.01'
' ) SOD MAT EXTENDED,
�� / � ! X-- # LOG VANE NOT INSTALLEC
e i
=>� X
O �' X 24"HDPE \ NICAR
t7 L�,� INV= 1 O 18.95' LOG VANES I I ned b
c �O Xp 1i�� t Vi NOT INSTALLED C( FESSi1/4 • ' J6s�es
v p 4,74 U,, 0 `��' 34+000 35 ''1 Jan �� • 0209.14
,2 aa�` c 11111 O 4 = 04318
r � ,� ®,mom tom. _
• 7 **,,,, -;--- ---
• • �i •i17t //> vth' ‘.9? / °\ / %�0 �i E \� •
X 4y +_Jam " i o „i
48"HDPE \ "' ���oi�� \' "'_�, �1
INV= 1018.03' - / —
X� Ow - - `- _ 6�
® fit ---- 11
NV=DOE7.80' SLOG VANES NOT
VANES %O�
1021 0c NOT INSTALLED INSTALLED '1'
x� n x
\ 20 10 0 20 40
11_14_ 111
\ SCALE(FT)
i 1 UT1 I I 1
I
z
1,030 I1 :
a —DESIGN PROFILE
1 IJJ
m Wro
a = _
m co
a 11
r
m 1,020 U ., /©42HDPE -
Q
III I M 11111111 1 111111111 I I ,, , ii , _ _
a
0
0
4
Y —AS-@IJII T PROFILE
m 1,010
Z
0
a
0
F
21 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1
z
m 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00
0
xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: •
At PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
re RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noz 1 1 50 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
:1c CARY,NC 2751 1
mix\ - - J
..1l.
` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

/ V C0 )(SHEET NO.
SOD MAT EXTENDED,LOG VANE NOT INSTALLED !;� """� l,y,m, i : I (PROJECT
092 )C 8
+,,
WG5 ,,� rnn r, s \, END UT1VP5 �J� >\�/i • tiffer STA.38+66.34 AL‘s PROFILE
\\(...
t.` 6>, // '!
ct •N.\. -41... qe
, ,, , •••• ', Naii.-- 4t14,- \
7 1
c'�1 >�:ry R 1�
LOG VANES I
LOG VANES
NOT INSTALLED Xs I� 0
eat 2a-
NOT INSTALLED • E�1
gyp \ WOODY RIFFLE • st Ir -�'
i�ii' VtQ - �
-::__.*:....ft,z;-•,,,,;-,-„,:„_._ 4,c4/ Wiltmil'''' 4*
7, \ •••\\iirkilk ...,),
IIIIIIIIII//�
• ___ NOT INSTALLED WO \ / \0 /.0
ir \
, : v.) \\
0.004
LOG VANES ! \ k \
NOT INSTALLED\ /
` • _ \ \\ \\ \ # \\ t� ,• w =/14.1. 1 Jfin
043187
qr7 R
Itt` • tt /
•
\ (4::' o L L8` _ %!.�/ rub/
VP4 A SOD MAT EXTENDED •
I y I LOG VANE NOT INSTALLED �.
\ 6 6�A�CH1INE sH
SCALE(FT)
I UT1 ....,:
I
1,030 - .
—DESIGN PROFILE
z • .
( . . . . . .
•
m N . .0 _
• : : :
a =°
I
a 1,020 LI
ml
/ !L.
raIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .
h
/ 2
.
Z
5
0 1,010
0
a
u
/
Z
Q
m
a —AS-RUILTPROFJ_E
2
Z
1,000
m 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
0
xI REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 t PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
7
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
a SURRY COUNTY, NC
Nu EPR RESTORATION
OW
Noz I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
s"4 CARY,NC 27511
mces� J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

PROJECT)(SHEET NO.
CO92 9
PLAN 1
��o°30 PROFILE
t oce..t�
102a 102g
/ �2,�
•
CONNECTION TO
MAIN CHANNEL
NOT INSTALLED LOG VANE c1r� 1 / �O
NOT INSTALLED K. I �S en:Zp�, LZQi 0
�T " / �� � '�2SI - 1026- 1\�ti
tip 103 0E4 I �. 5 \\' ullinlliii
e
�4 f i 4£04; ' /2�0• �./�+�� � __� / \1p2 p24 _ �� N� /,�� by
e,/% ,�� C�� � A tfal d
41h�C`�/ -1029. sEAF:1 .4 04'0i):
'£ �`'�A ., ` f�•r�•0� ����I�� SIX ® � �� Dat, 0.014
� 1 �` A� 7 •
> �p = 043187
.4d
....t,iv 1".:q ' ..,,, ;
BEGIN i\ U � � .
ST,A.1O+ 0.00 -
ilex ./
1/04
9£0I- 20 10 O 20 40
`11111 1
SCALE(FT)
UT2 : •: : :
.
•
•
•
•
_ —D SIGTe PFCFILE
7.1
5
o
.ao
• 1,020 •
m .
•
ASDu1LT r zorl_C •
•
Z
m 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
0
re REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1( PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 t PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
7
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION
Noz I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
s'10ac CARY,NC 27511
m�s1 J
J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

�ZOV `c- (PROJECTHEETNO)
' �\ ��� PLAN /
�\ PROFILE
ZZOI // 17+��•� / , ' nZ0V COL
��
°� V P 7
,, '�. �� 020
/ a v 1
( i ; ;: � l LOG VANES
_— ___ 1?Ii 1/��� �I r, i. �\ NOT INpTALLEDN000\IC QI�1 Q/ /ii
.�� //SOD MAT EXTENDED, `�3 ' ''� `� s}fined by���I �A��it/ / LOG VANES , 1214
/ NOT INSTALLED SOD MAT EXTENDED �E LiU'� / -
� di
��.// Ai n i' p ' "v --, jON GINS O.,c,
,,,,
.. mllinm
/* . 47
WG7 I *3� � '� o
i i S G 3 " V ,. <, 1
—/ / `.*a 1' W
i I / / �� 4� �C`
/ / . // SOD MAT EXTENDED, �� sy,
1 / LOG VANE F�
/' NOT INSTALLED ' 7,
e
`1I11-1���
SCALE(FT)
UT2
III
DESIGN WAS HIGHER ELEVATION--i . —DESIGN PROFILE
T EXISTING GROUND :• •: :• :• •: :•
Z PROFILE A _.ED TO AVOID FILL
I-
co Z
m 1,020 j � �,,,,i'��:1�i v
0
4
U
/
m
1,015
z
0
—A -3LI_TPROFILE
1
z
m 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
0
xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1/- PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noz I 1 50 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
slrIT CARY,NC 27511
N.mces� — — J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

PROJECT# SHEET NO.
10 _ — �4 / C 092 )C 11
20 �t1
7
�o'o� °24 \,,,..
PLAN 7
��`� PROFILE
6 I.Cl/I.1
l� „ mob
LOG VANE / 5
6' i' NOSTALLED :11 '
/ �C1 \\``\\\\NICIAIR//ii"O / / / /l ®I,Z 1 '�ignedby
.. O ��Y �. °� J02 1 Qp I Hiit, I/� Cn �n J�DES Da e 0414
�� r ' �, \ r / if ( Yi =
_ 043187
�11
/ NL St.19.‘1;Aki- '."A-'° ////t/iiiiiii\\O
0 I /ft
."Iii�11► �� ai!siWOODY RIFFLE �ck '_' GiI• � "� NOT INST�/LLED /14lik
I /. M 1 SOD MAT EXTENDED, 3X p �„ � // g �!� LOG VANE NOT / Q �; � /
IINSTALLED / �, .` � ° / /
1 1 -LOG VANE ,' k,,,,, iiiir
t '3` _ ��_'
i \ \ NOT INSTALLED / �'`�� ------ __--
�� ---� _ ^� 20 10 0 20 40
SEE SHEET 8 111111111
�
SCALE(FT)
UT2
1,025
Z
—DESIGN PROFIL., N
I-
to al hi
a 1,020 w
m
in z z
/ J
gi g-- ~�,,�__ /, 0
5 �� W��W- .— _
—
O 1,015 ♦ ♦ /—
r I
Z
ml .
Z —AS-BUILT PROFILE
aI II .
a
L9
2, 1,010
Z
m 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
0
re REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1( PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noe I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
s"0T-c CARY,NC 27511
mces� — — J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

t t CPROOJ�E2T)(SHEET2NO,
6 /017 !\ 0,4
J
k
7 )( , -
PLAN f
Zr ,c4) k 7k\k PROFILE
/- 48 HDPE k \ PLANFORM RE-ALIGNED
/ •�\ INV= 1014.00' AROUND BEDROCK ADDING
�� / \ k 1 1.9 LF TO UT2B
110.
.,
/
6 ^ici� 1p
'/ / •���•• '�!��P`61 Os:7�'~r 48"HDPE ,8 i `J k
' 4I � ulilllli i �,,yr.� iI/; INV= 1013.93' �k w /iii
_I� io:�i�y .���� r. ♦ 018 10 ES Sg130,d by
�\24"HDPE �O/w„�iP �il�)'�`, *`v ,l,of 31�� ��� 07 � pF cyfey
+��• le .a4 A 77 Jon Dat OA9.'44
0 .a,..�O �<,,,.� ®�.-• �► ,_ a �-
! IINV= 1015.43' �,� I 4„ � � rr 0
O 1 / k t�//� �� O -, R ;b .i NOT _= SEAL�b:zo:oo aorli
r:i■■ \ KO' .:.; _ _ j , 4 ef, INSTALLED = 043187 =
\ if /
L.U1-illiVale-r-- Ai/;;;4- \\\
`� - • - •- �f� ����/111111111A1• ��
IV -, w
NL .: (0 2 2
L�,O 24"HDPE �k a —— — 9�� _— i�� W �✓
INV= 1015.21' `'�� ��` ��'�
V — -- -11t�_
-6 i6
_\ .' z CV 20 10 0 20 40
`IIII I
CA �
UT2 I I 1
1■
III —AS-BUILT PROFILE _
z .
1,020 m
N
' ' ' I I —BEDROCK ALONG PROPOSED CENTERLINE W
•
, W .
al ace
(n
m Z I Z .
Li
/ 2 m
-
Z �i
Elm
•
/
m 1,010 II
o DESIGN PROFILE — ■■
II III I
0),
25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00
xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20
O PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
a SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noz 1150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
s"l4 CARY,NC 27511
N.mces1 - J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

� SEE SHEET 19 CPR00J�E2T#1�SHEj)(SHEET
amp .. C) J NO)
�� I 1 A4,V" OJ . ♦♦ ♦
kt, ' 1 kr, g., rn / ♦ •♦♦ 7o PLAN f
GATE •�' � �.4 PROFILE
,1, 7Ozu al. 7 \ .�
4' � 10194'1 - —— —.A0. — _ 1Y�' T' — — i5. 4 • 't •
� 4' _ LOG VANE —_ _- __- _ -_ .iD hl _ ,` s r� ���.^'.
r4 •ST INSTALLED _——,_--.1 c' r
��— — ——— 34+00 �- or „,o °�`J`
t.li
ovilivio#:7
`►il1 18 _a VP8 �� i'� „j ,�1 ���e■t—��� O ����t�llluuliiii
1 p __ __ CAR '%/
7.s� a • --——QCO
t1 �N Q/ / db
11 lk oo .. �. SG � ___ ----' �_ ----5 _--_ sCG_ —'/ �\\ /� _ e\) �i1� OcES' Cd �
\ lrO
/ 9�0C�- _ -- - - l0 '�ic .' = 5EAE6:z0: z 4'00!
�- Jon
glitt
`�,
` . • \Lim,'\
:.a•�`o.-a�� / / .6, $�- 6� ��;5? `� • ) = 043187
..„— �� k / O' LOG ROLLER I
♦ `♦ .•_. - i : , �/ NOT INSTALLED �� lli` ! F ��
CD
_____ _ ` / pNFY Jo GIN b
\+\ \—.— — —-- I0- _ �// /L�6i, // ��O END UT2 n �nlll
STA.34+90.84
-001 C-4 ;PS<I4
-NI: --.-----
/
,,,, ^F / 20 10 0 20 40
`11111
SCALE(FT)
UT2 .
1,020 .
—AS-BUILT PROFILE
z
O .V
coo
u) all -
a = —
al 1,015 IIII�IIIM'IIIIIIIIII1111�11111IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII 1111111111 111111111��11111111��11IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII
m Z
Ct
..
i _✓ �� _ r, err f
. I • . :
0 1,010 .
0
Y —DESIGN I-"?- )rILE
m�
a
2 1,005
z
m 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00
0
ill
xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 t PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
D
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20
O RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PLANNING &
SURRY COUNTY, NC
No EPR RESTORATION
OW
Noe 1 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
slrIT CARY,NC 27511
m�s1 — — J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

k )(SHEET NO.
(PROJECT
092 )C 14 )
X/ PLAN 1
+/ n CE CE CECE PROFILE
+ ®� ,\s�� - `�� .;��54��• -i.44:1,,,....7 I1;31.51,Fht?.(61,,,_.:
7ij. I. LOG STEP NOT INSTALLED__..,..,, pm: ,
._,...., _, .________:_o_x5.72 . _i_o —
iri
,rG111�� _ " a \ A �� 3;'� � „ fr - ►.r.i 1.i——
. ►� ��+ "^. .,_L . a1iy fe. Yh•i• i�: )tom•1• .v ��h• - 4, 7*
+ ® . ..., µ v� ' ,. .. �.�r 106�'- _ to
J .0 d 1 \. %. :.r . ' I '-6 . fpT \VIyL 11111106 AY,' r1U
�r m r .x '
Q r -r' ' <'. III �� h� 4
,�00,0001110*-
I L�_ --- ! I\ ts�.6 �, �l✓ ✓ n I! / �41 C A- ned by
�,.. _ i v 0 c9 Da • 20.0114
LSZOL \ 9L0I. 411111 Z0 �'�OL '� �oN,,��•��\�-9� `---_____ -_ ,g _ 043187
At , zzo,
iii.
BEGINUT38L06 lOL g0 99p1 5906 %/C/�0NGINE�c0\-\C' .
TA. 0+00.00 0 6,1 6N,6 090 /'�/n JIi\O
6ZOOq�0\ 1.80 L �g
� '� 3C 3C
//X/X�� �\ O 3C 3C 3C 3C 3C
� � C Z
20 10 0 20 40
`1I11-I
SCALE(FT)
UT3
I
1,080 —DFSIG-N PROF LF
n
1 J I
m 1,070 A.. r
J
J 1
th
/ 1,060 .�
0
o
Z —AS-BU1:L'T MOTTLE
m
z
0
a
0
2, 1,050
Z
m 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
0
E REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1 PREPARED •IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
0w EPR RESTORATION 11
Noz I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
�"ITc CARY,NC 27511
m,x� J`
J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

(PROJECT#)CHEETNO)
15
esPLAN
CE 48"HDPE
PROFILE
INV= 1047.21'
CE CD CE CE 11 N1CA
Ind
LOG STEP NOT INSTALLED i � E� gifOrcees
48"HDPE t, Date? .09.f9
INV= 1047.52' figt t•
i �~j - SEAb:21: 6- 4'00
LOG ROLLER NOT INSTALLED ,� �$ ��' E. 043187
r � A W
LOG STEP NOT INSTALLED r
,T�� �, __ _ {� - -_ �I: f` ' ~ %,0 4GINEB c-) :
44/ `+ go- I _ - ,tp• _— ! 111 11110w UO 111,)44.11.041,___,01 .g5:8
a
�'" {� I v :gto ``w fG��■it,_——— - ``�f: ice.
c do,iitIf �O
r ems^ Iss q u�+'���, m, �,_, ._ L__ I' �f rl
.� / 8rr HDPE of fa r
9 � `^
�I�i .r� �iT... - --- V' Z �n,' se,
b� �* i`G .....�%' 0� go 77 � .41` . 6)
11111111111.1
`___990�-�==D��� 91 — — S�` 0d 990� �9ot AA
-- - --=6.00 1,,, Zg L901 �--4_a_H-D,o-E_ Ili e
9 -- - E90 6�-- 8901 INV= 1048.06' 04
0Z b901 6906 ti
9901 -090V - 6901 �'
® 9901 3� 3� �x�x .'w
3� X -\\
v 3C ` 3� x � 3 20 i O O 20 40
' `1I11��
' SCALE(FT)
UT3 :
— SIGN PROFILE
= w _ • -U
m, Z 111 11-- r a- _
4.1
1,050 FU IIII I I I ..� I I .NM ■0-_
1 @ 42"HDPE Q
Q
g I T'
p
4
0
/
m 1,040 ■■■ -A&BUILTP?OFI_E
Z
0
a
0
F
2
z, l
m 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
0
xi REVISIONS f' PREPARED FOR: 1 f' PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
D O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING 8c
0 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
a SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noe 1 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
slrEE CARY,NC 2751 1
Ofc qn J` J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J` !

# SHEET NO.
LOG STEP (PROJECT
092 )C 16 )
NOT INSTALLED
m m 1050 3D 3� PLAN 7
® -X X-C 1p1A0A9 3� 3� � _ PROFILE
y
0
1 45 0,
3 4 ___-
1052 14 21+ U 1 ;, 2. ,6� �, -.�% ; aro 3,�Y04�1 =_ —_==., r.. '4
15� , Q� �� _� ' ,,/fi X 0 ` ira
Cl/la•v �•,,.," �n'oo.,, • r 9 u no._ .r, �7.$.i 104 �r,
/�//// r_}•.^ - �" r��, ,���� , ` �'4o- •MAm mmm� M c �m�y ��' �s �rZ _ +�
/ rr• - .-. I •� �► r ALL,.— !•Ar '. c _
/ �` . �� _ ��� ,� ISM q�� a` nrl// ., !t �L/
ifv •-...4 ' /2
boi
v _ ----g;0, 6N0� � f9� LbpL OC St'pt �� 6. `v \`� ,• \ Q \\\Mililliiii1/4
-� _ % 8 0 of
,.\`-\N CAR
.'+ �f1 . .ipo r • �� Date. .0934
._
frl %�'`'. �. '/�1 .�� -�_ -� SEAS: . z 4'0("
= 090� r/ y cam/ `I �� END UT4qt
= 043187
(n .rn •••a'�,�d�"` _, !'� STA. 1 1+34.1 1 -
.,;'` - O ,
(51 �.,� SEE SHEET 20 FOR PROFILE X X � p �j NGINE ��
IIIIW
I/�9°� ROCK STEP STRUCTURE X ��0z L�OL /No/ J. ) 0„
ADDED TO STABILIZE HEADCUT X 0.4
llt�
/ STRUCTURE ENDS AT STA. 10+04 X�X i� 6e
X BEGIN UT4
X STA.10+00.00
20 10 0 20 40
111111111
SCALE(FT)
UT3
IIII
—DESIGN THALWEG "
1,050 SEE SHEET 20
n FOR UT4 PROFILE
ai
x —
m'tn<ifir-
m — _
1,040 IIIIIIII; 111111111111111111nn111111nn1 �� . = ^ _ I-
_ _ � — __ _ 4
N —..
g1 I I III I I IIII - `�� - __
o _
0
a
o
/
m 1,030
Z
g —,N3-DUILT PRQrILE
1,
z'
m 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
0
re REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 t PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
7
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
No EPR RESTORATION
Noz I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
s"l4 CARY,NC 27511
m�s, - - J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

(PROJECT)(SHEET NO.
092 )C 17 )
LOG ROLLER
AND TOE WOOD PLAN f
03D NOT INSTALLED - PROFILE
�A"�y�(���(( •
1V' 46. 8 . -I. .L4.�i� �111111111111/,
LOG ROLLER LIT♦ Irc'• - UK ice`• \\`\N CAR l/'1/4,,
AND LOG STEP ` \ t•' „ .1 44 ��� ��5- 17aI1}yr ?d by
NOT INSTALLED lstOG• Q
CVO l,K1C�484-t: le; 1' DKr q- DatE?' 0.09 4
1� � 1'`-- t• �flfl SEAL6:22:28 04•0Ce�'L iii• i 1039 104 =
�_'�� 3$ 0 p3 = 043187
0 1041 �Q �Q =�• "• _ V�`0�- - e�_ a an 103 1�ttf• A
Q ___ - - 6
,.yam -
k .. OO :. Mfg 1 ^Q ''/ ��,
iv Qlge ,� bc3 �Q3� /'w� I11g• ��r ��.�� W..." � � ��. c� • ..�; 1---- G93ht ','iveY J - \.
gym -- IilYYil� r�a��.. .� a. E C� ." . 29+ ;. , iit_Z �i 0. --` • ` __ V '.. /Jo y i -- ,=t� �1P��► o,itiali�'l "�Jl .,cit. i oo I I I I I
1 3 _ ��� 1 0/ �n�,v ,. • d d rF ♦+R i � ii y, c �� n �. t Odd
J r4 \ _ __ > 1 ���_ i7_1�e�� ye• . � '' ♦c, ., y�,�. r - -,...`"'ar Ii. ... f' 4�
1--. *iv.:911604% 4•41,71.1,75‘7:, ': ',..„.....0.-Ilik ,--- --, __ Viiiiiii. 1 ---- -5...,
s0
6£°, $£OL e°/ CO 1 �j
'0� Nai o �'
��, •
1 1g x x ► x -_ °�
• �x x
�x� 19_ x x� x
4111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111b—
x x si x`.
20 10 0 20 40
111111111
SCALE(FT)
UT3 : : : :
—DESIGN PROFILE
I
■■
Z
r , ..
m W ii
to
W ..
m Z - EN i ' i i i i i
m• 1,030 I �::�� _
.��. --.... _ 11111111111111111111
/ 1�1�1 �E Em..
o :�i':• �� —i�
_ m ME_II
a .___.
m• 1,020
—AS-BUILT PROFILE
0
a
F
2
z
m 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00
0
xi REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1( PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
Nu EPR RESTORATION
11
ow
Noe I 1 50 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
•"0_-c CARY,NC 2751 1
mix\ - - J
,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

(PROJECT)(SHEET NO.
092 18
,4_,Otor40-_
B
® PLAN
• G PROFILE
eil
p,�. •
0�R 30
o
CP
�0 �4',-;..-;01 /..;35"1,........_ i„el.,,,,.1,47,..7 W s SG5 , ) -
rli
(yam
11' �"' "- , / ��' ��y #� '� .,., .aDsl .,,. 4.:, 4 .1 n, ksigned by
�, IN
/,0 , ,;`z•
C'aS, ��' 1 / '^� \'�'1k'•,. 'ram = 'n.. `' .... _. :? �' ` � ��... �� 0F SS/(? Jiffies
00/
•
tips ' 26 �� r � ��,•� -'. .._ ,>z Jan srAL
�i �` 1�z : 1-000
!j / �/ ��\ WGV/ ` // i/ •1 4i'' •� rn �% �' FNGINE��
���
e J.
,, / / /\ $ " I cb'ffs4
ON ,-� 1 F
V- 1 -lS'
_�CE /
CE _
C C _\ 40
I 0
��� E `I I I �\ .w CE
SCALE(FT)
UT3
1,040 _
O N 1111 1 -_ - 3
co co I— III s
DESIGN WAS HIGHER ELEVATION THAN EXFSTINGvROUNG
a
W IIII I PROFILE ADJUSTED TO AVOID FILL. o
I T •••• I III IIIII
a 1,030 w Ill W
co z I _
U z — Illlln1111111111
5 'I' 111 I . I I I I I — ,.
O 1,020 !!! 1111111111111111111111111111111..
i
u 111 1111
III
Q
m
al —AS-BUILT PROFILE -
2, 1,010
Z
m 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00
0
xi REVISIONS t PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn N0. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION 11
Noe I 150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
slrIT CARY,NC 27511
mixs� - J
J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

(--''''''''
�O STA.37+94.39 (PROCTCHEETNO)
. ,.,..... .P PLAN 7
rs \ e PROFILE
f)'s (( co\p\i //4b/
,,A • i / /
lai,,,,,Vi4it /
ems' I (I o
\ \� �o ullnlu iiii�. � �Ir fi�G�� �i �
J H CAR
\\ END UT2 � xvstd by
/ */ / 1 . � \ v CIS FESS � ,,'
N. //� ' " _
� � ��+ � \\ \'Y,,00\ STA.34+90.84 O
/ / / -- ii:,7
ke' \ 1 Y1— Da 0.09�4
/ /,ii�� ��" 9 I III JdIl SEAL16:211 oavoT
"yli/"/i i '/� � � I I _ 043187
i j �'i1j I I IQ
co i
♦ ; \ I tiril 08 II F/1/GW :i O 6 �Ier
3 ,, \ 1 I 1°4IJOC oll �1in11` ti II .,' /III �;INI r, ,,isiI0 1 I I I 1
W tr efecn vr•n, +�► .;�.V MhMM i.,All�'S;'k]52✓rs ;�+ -// O I i I �' I I I �
Z .,_A v�� .11.4- 'Lam, lw ..r sd ;;,, ' / I I .- I I
�1a o`4/
4,,
KII
b0/ vaCvv � 3/4�� "4 ' vv 20 10 0 20 40
SEE SHEET 13 1 SCALE(F(FT)
UT3 : : : :
1,030
0 m
a F DESIGN PROFILE
= UJ
m Li]
a,
m 1,020 S
a w -
-\.- I .
_ _— liw-;:�.
F
I I
5 _
! 1010
a —AS-BUILT PROFILE
ro
z'
0
a
0
2 1,000 li
Z
m 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
0
re REVISIONS ( PREPARED FOR: 1( PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1( PROJECT ENGINEER 1
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
D
O 2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20
0 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PLANNING &
a SURRY COUNTY, NC
oW EPR RESTORATION
Noe 1150 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
.`10a-c CARY,NC 27511
mlr� — — J`
J` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

(PROJECT)(SHEET NO.
092 20
• UT4
PROFILE
' —DESIGN PROFILE
1,050
1,040
1,030 —ACIUIL—PRDFI-LE
10+00 11+00
z
0
-
N
2
a
m
m
a
S
IY
J
7
(I)
a NI�IgIR//'��'''i
Z/
C i d, `Cady i49ed by
a <Z-- �c'Dater 0.09.fi_4
o
Jol€le 2 SEAt:23: 9 4'OO
Y
= 043187
Z =
S - e
E �
a %cj GIN cc?
/ -?\
//,:4y � 0 \
, I I1 z
In
a
0
IYi REVISIONS PREPARED FOR: 1 t PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: 1 t PROJECT ENGINEER
rn NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
O 1 DRAFT RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 6/3/20 ECOSYSTEM
O2 RECORD DRAWINGS CJ KLT 9/4/20 PLANNING &
m RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PROGRESS DRAWING
EW PURPOSES ONLY
o� SURRY COUNTY, NC DO NOT UFOR SE FOR CONSTRUCTION
EPR RESTORATION
Noe 1 1 50 SE MAYNARD RD,SUITE 140
."4 CARY,NC 2751 1
mlr� _ J` ,I` LICENSE#P-1 182 J

0 ' / 1 WALNUT TREE SUBDIVISION
r�_ P.B. 9, PG. 40 a. EX. SHED POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENT
w PNsr
' \ 1 \ 17 HERRING ST. \ \ ©POSSIBLE LANDSCAPING ENCROACHMENT
NCS9 �� PP B 12,_PG. 134 -� - r I - 16 \ \ 0 EX. 1-STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING
�/�-
-i 1 19 1$ 17 N/F dOEX. SHED
‘IIW Point of L \
-if.-- o•` Beginning 1 3 2 1 2� RALPH EE COE
Ci 1 O 314i O I I b, f a' j & wife, DOROTHY COE
y f RB 1"EIP w`�j D.B. 564, PG. 89 I
3 8" !3E a PIN: 5010-20-72-9031 /
�Q,' ol-
io RB S88'3�.04_E \ 821.24' t
7---' 11 • SR137. tin 115;,,94' 124.47'.� 124.01' t t S88'32 05 E 473.96' : EIR
6891' 1 EIP 108' t 100' 100' 8482' I PROPERTY LINE
JOHNSON FAMILY FARM, LLC h y W W y y W `Y 4, y W ttttySITED.B. 1124, PG. 547 � "D.B. 497, PG. 575 �' y y y y y y W 55.0 y EX. STREAM yd'6 O I � '
„tit''/ r PIN: 5010-00-53-9021 ry�',�� W y y y 4 y v. y y y W y W n L 1 �'� - �� ---
7 F,L. >�/
N85'11 52'VV 509.00' 57223�5g' �� o N E - TO - - 1 n
5R�3�, y y W v nd wit MMY ��
+ is
p W y I p e SHARO B' BOWMA I ! N
/`" ;> ��� y y y I I 30' UTILITY EASEMENT PINT.s p960 pG.L' Bpw"' !
+ i, - 44
4 2 y y r I ' /D.B. 353, PG. 608 0_2=11 p3 97 a-
R 1 r;r ` vJw EX. v �''�, w W ! 'I' SEE SHEET 2
/ Ili I 0 C M OF 2 FOR
DITCH/Q�� �s�� y y y W ss �"ilo+l--30' yam; z a NC GRID TIE
VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) /Q�o o- y y y 2>>' 1 pro �o�2 INFORMATION.
(� /h W w W y �2A I I a p,N �,I)
`J� /,0 c4 y y J y '•'.�' I 1 O °' ��`� /
REVIEW OFFICER CERTIFICATION / • * y y y y y I I A a;W
A' C) Lew 1 1
�� /h'O�`� y y y 4 W Sl L-I m -.1('
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA '6 rr p 'v w y y O. /
COUNTY OF SURRY ak/ oa AREA A-I /LS2>, y y 4, 4, ,<.9-
REVIEW OFFICER OF SURRY COUNTY, dry/ 5.542 ACRES 'cps W W y y •���; REF. 1 / N�SF
CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS CREEK !y W W W / GEORGE VERNON DAVIS
AFFIXED, MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING FOR BANK Sgs y and wife, LINE TABLE
WHICH THE REVIEW OFFICER HAS RESPONSIBILITY AS PROVIDED BY LAW. 5/8"REBAR SS, y y MARGARET SMITH DAVIS
/ LIFE ESTATE LINE BEARING DISTANCE
w CAP SET y �� 1"ERB D.B. 1609, PG. 647 L1 S03'I f 3911 97.52'
.• -- �,L' PIN: 5010-20-81-5289 L2 513'08 341V 110.37'
---7--- <<9 ,'-C7)142B L3 S30'0734 E 94.80'
S� N \/ z L4 S40'25'14 iY 99.17'
REVIEW OFFICER DATE EwgR N. Wy576.7� y 4, y � 0;13f
NO 1 15
`A < y J y W W 40�9y /
L7UA 9432 14' 170'
1-1 y 1, "J, 4' 4, y w �= / L8 N40'2520' 105.13'
CREF.71)
y y ' y y Y ' y 'cnC.P- �' L9 S46i435"E 110.94'
Lf0 S19'37'44'E 62.65'
y W y L * y y y ,y. /
NSF y r► IF/ y y cNN �, L12 S82'34'431W 135.36'
HULL BROTHERS LUMBER / y AREA A-2 y y w /
COMPANY, INC. ti 9, 100 ACRES W y y w v, L13 N1652'47 E 160.47'
I, ELISABETH G.TURNER,CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER D.B. 456, PG. 49 O 1 L14 N66'30'04� 117.00'
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY D.B. 489, PG. 1 / Cw W y y y y W y y y O!U�1 J L15 S09'4321 E 116.20'
SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK_ AS , PAGE_ PIN: 5010-00-50-5252 rev y O / L16 58025281V 158.46'
y y `Y W y y y V' .V � •br5 60
SHOWN ); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY I $ y y C'. 1/�2"EIP N/F L17 S54'39281V 13814'
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE FACE OF l, y . .y y W W N77'50'42"W k y y y y W �� 29� W W i/2'NEXT TO DORIS H. VERNON
y 1"EIP D.B. 660, PG. 499 TIE LINE TABLE
THIS MAP;THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1:10,000 ; ry,;) } W . �104.45' y y y 4' N85.15'55"E W W Point of� PIN: 5010-20-81-7030 AXLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE TYPE'
AND THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S.47-30 I
y y W y y 256.37 y Beginning
AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION L Ti 521'57zs� 5.44' TIE
AREA 'A-3" W W y W y W W y y y ./y :.)NEXT TO T2 N21'57'111v 56.44'0 77E
NUMBER,AND SEAL THIS 15th DAY OF FEBRUARY,2019. T3 S80'16'391+' 50.02' 11E
`\�ttttIII111!!�' 35'05"E W y (O/(�, !•� y \ y W y y y y W y W y / W W 45"POPLAR
///{p .�`� � CARP 777, I 1. 183 ACRES N80" JAB, T3 I J• V �Li R J 15 T4 S072529'W 50.03'. PL
4,6 `/ // 232 y `i' �O<^, x �. W V'. y y W y `V W J. v y�•� y Wto T6 S06'352319 1.3,164' PL
/Et ,�C/ � ag. ` °�.c S /0�4(1% L�� ✓L W y j i �p�, Wit:;% \ \ Exg�j
4, �Dt y y ,-� y y W y 4, y 1 4
1 ELISABETH G.TURNER,P.L.S.#L-4440 - .4- 9�. W y y y y y y W U' m y j s.. W y y y y W y y y y W y y y y y �27 �'1"EIP N/F
T+EmrrE ONLY PL=PROPERm LINE RE
_ - SEAL = - o� JEAN PAT1Y PARRIES
W y .4,- ' y 5 y y y y y W W y ,V. and
- •r L-4440 �. _ Point of / T4 L Nss• y y y y W O9 V.
LARRY DAVIS CONNER
m y gyp. ,� Beginning y y L16 283>� y y c�FJi. PIN: 50 660,
�20 8048694
y y REF. 1
99
<�`51 •• S U `IXf• '.� STEWA ENTTS CREEKCENTERLINE
\ 82.34'43"E v 4'. �11 <>�3�2 w y 1"EIP _
I, ELISABETH G. TURNER, PROFESSIONAL LAND 7BFrH G• �\���`� IS PROPERTY LINE 204 55' (Ft) y L12 .- 8" 7
SURVEYOR # L 4440, CERTIFY TO ONE OR MORE OF 7!I if l l i I I �\ �; i 749.55' EHB N)� i NE �� m m� W
THE FOLLOWING AS INDICATED: N� 5/8 1 ,N. ROP02 E kV 802--7 NEXT TO J�E MATCHLINE
~� N/F
aB / v £147)- 6' 1"EIR w/BOLT & ,05� 2l JASON RYAN BECK and wife,
N E 33" WHITE OAK 04 g 29 N F C KEENIA J. BECK
X d. THAT THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY OF ANOTHER o�- �7 CEF. 2 pR 5�0 k9 DALE RAY KING of D.B. 1451, PG. 984
CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF olCA 9 5 3� D.B. 1649, PG. 818 cr
EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR o / ' PIN: 5010-20-80-3191 4 PIN: 5010-20-80-8225
OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF __ - . ,„_ /5/8: ,.
SUBDIVISION.
G
NE n ' CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SUMMARY
ELISABETHTH G.TURNER,P.L.S.#L-4440
EASEMENT LEGEND:
PROPERTY EASEMENT
AREA(ACRES) CONSERVATION EASEMENT
W A-1 5.542 LINE
LPT SURVEYED
CEF.. CEF. `) CEF. - y REF. 1 - JOHNSON _ TIE LINE
PIN: 5010-00-71 -3049 A-2 9.100 - . - EXISTING STREAM
N/F N/F N/F - - - - EX. EASEMENT
G. EDDIE JOHNSON and wife, DEBORAH M. BEASLEY, SHAWN A. MOSER and wife, A-3 1 .183
GENERAL NOTES: CAROL S. JOHNSON GRETA M. BOYD, and TERESA H. MOSER - _ - OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D.B. 1033, PG. 644 PORTIA M. OAKLEY D.B. 1555, PG. 898 REF. 2 - BEASLEY, B-1 4.771 - RIGHT OF WAY (GIS)
2. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83(2011) DATUM D.B. 233, PG. 179 D.B. 1555, PG. 895 P.B. 32, PG. 180, Tract 2 r // BOYD, & OAKLEY EASEMENT CORNER
TAKEN FROM PLAT BOOK 34, PAGE 125 IN THE SURRY COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS PIN: 5010-00-71-3049 P.B. 34, PG. 125, Tract Two PIN: 5919-02-79-1649 PIN: 5010-20-70-7007 B-2 1 .835 � REBAR & CAP SET
OWNER ADDRESS: PIN: 5010-20-70-7007 OWNER ADDRESS:
OFFICE. 224 Beth Lane OWNER ADDRESS: 169 Scarlett Ln. C-1 0.532 © PROPERTY )
PIN: CORNER
3. THE AREA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPUTED USING THE COORDINATE COMPUTATION Mt. Airy, NC 27030 286 Cletius Moser TrI. Mt. Airy, NC 27030 REF. 3 - MOSER DESCRIBED
Mt. Airy,NC 27030 5919-02-79-1649 EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE
METHOD. C-2 0.473 ERB EXISTING REBAR
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SERVE AS A REFERENCE FOR THE CREATION OF A IRON ROD
CONSERVATION EASEMENT. THIS PLAT IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE LAND PARCELSx x x x x x x x x .x REF. 4 - BEASLEY D 0 602 N EIR E EXISTING OR FORMERLY
AND THEIR BOUNDARIES AFFECTED BY THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ARE NOT CHANGED REF. 4 REF. 5 CEF.-6 X x x x x PIN: 5919-00-79-7501 BY THIS PLAT. 0 CALCULATED CORNER
ing
5. 5/8" REBAR WITH CAP SET AT EASEMENT CORNERS. N/F N/F N/F43:8 REF. 5 - BEASLEY P.O.B. for Legal Descriptions
6. LINES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS A DASHED LINETYPE AND WERE TAKEN FROM TERRY G. BEASLEY and wife, TERRY G. BEASLEY and wife, GRETA M. BOYD PIN: 5919-08-89-1501 E 0.143 Point of Beginning
PL PROPERTY LINE
INFORMATION REFERENCED ON THE FACE OF THIS FIAT. DEBORAH M. BEASLEY DEBORAH M. BEASLEY D.B. 320, PG. 98
7. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND THEREFORE D.B. 489, PG. 1175 D.B. 1446, PG. 358 PIN: 5919-00-89-4216 i\ \\\\\ REF. 6 - BOYD
D.B. 315, PG. 169 PIN: 5919-08-89-1501 OWNER ADDRESS: PIN: 5919-00-89-4216 F 1 .225
MAY NOT SHOW ALL ENCUMBRANCES UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A LICENSED PIN: 5919-00-79-7501 OWNER ADDRESS: 194 Cletius Moser TrI.
ATTORNEY-AT-LAW SHOULD BE CONSULTED REGARDING CORRECT OWNERSHIP, WIDTH, AND OWNER ADDRESS: 286 Cletius Moser TrI. Mt. Airy, NC 27030
LOCATION OF EASEMENTS AND OTHER TITLE QUESTIONS REVEALED BY A TITLE 286 Cletius Moser Trl. Mt. Airy, NC 27030 TOTAL EASEMENT AREA 25,4�6 200' 0' 200' 400'
EXAMINATION. THE SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR Mt. Airy, NC 27030
ENCUMBERANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OWNERSHIP, TITLEMI MI NM INI
EVIDENCE, OR OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE EXAMINATION MAY
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet
DISCLOSE.
8. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND/OR ENCUMBRANCES THAT MAY AFFECT
THE PROPERTY(S).
9. A PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN A DESIGNATED FEMA FLOOD P.O. BOX 148 CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR CAD FILE:
HAZARD ZONE PER FIRM MAP #371 1 501 000J & #371 1 501 900J EFFECTIVE REVISED DATE 1
SWANNANOA, NC 28778 RED BARN CE F
AUGUST 18, 2009.
10.ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS WERE NOT EXAMINED AS PART OF THIS P-0702 (919)-827-0745 ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION, LLC
SURVEY. www.turnerlandsurveying.com '
11.THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF WETLANDS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS NOT LAND SURVEYINGCertified DBE/WBE RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE SCALE: 1'=200
BEEN DETERMINED BY THIS SURVEY.
12.UTAITIES ARE SHOWNE WHERE ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES WERE VISIBLE AND SURVEY DATE: MAR. 2018) DRAWN BY: DST/EGT TLSPROJ.: 18-003 (USAGE Action ID Number saw-2018-1441 )
ADJACENT TO CONSERVATION EASEMENT. SHEET
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK , PAGE
SURVEYED BY: DST) REVIEWED BY: DST/EGT PLAT DATE: 2/15/2019 ' MT. AIRY TOWNSHIP SURRY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1 of 2

REVIEW OFFICER CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SURRY LINE TABLE
, REVIEW OFFICER OF SURRY COUNTY,
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS
L18 .522'54 39V 155.94'
L19 S66'14 24 80.95'
AFFIXED, MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING FOR L2120 S62'09'f5 E f34.18'
WHICH THE REVIEW OFFICER HAS RESPONSIBILITY AS PROVIDED BY LAW. L21 S89'38' 1"W 214.83'
L22 S1t1'2821"W 62.62'
L W W W W U) W • (�, V•� W W -W W W �Y * �Y W W ^ L23 S7J 17 09"W 136.58'
_ • -/ W W W W 4' 52 1"EIP N//F L24 N7129'327/ 94.12'
��l JEAN PATTY PARRIES L25 N82'39'01►v 130.28'
REVIEW OFFICER DATE = `� J 5 N6 2 L26 N21'1107'E 29.48'
Point of T4 L W W W W W W W 9 2 ca LARRY DAVIS CONNER
.1 Beginning L16 S28, W W W v y I.0 / L27 N6Tf8'51"W 169.01'
5 D.B. 660, PG. 499
CENTERLINE \ W W REF. 1 `�� W W w 5 PIN: 5010-20-80-8694 L28 N54'1851"W 110.00'
STEWARTS CREEK N82•3q'43"F �3 W W 1"EIP N L29 N39'25'41"W 140.07'
IS PROPERTY LINE (PL) L12 �2
204.55 ( 48"
calm=I /49.55' E B �� _` -. a L3� S06 0717E 109.67'
Z // �� �� .02 06"),/,.
NEEXT TO �,�� M ATC H L I N E ,� L32 s89 z$
Sai
tiB v 7'ROpFRn L 8p2.16 1"EIR w/BOLT & R(� / r; N F o 'n L34 N112821"E 81.23'
0 co- �,9 �EF ONE•
33" WHITE OAK PR°4�Oghg9, DALE NF7AY KING a JASON KEENIA RYAN �ECBECKK d wife, z 0:
LL35 36 N�9514'11 1v 96.78'
o� 55 3� D.B. 1649, PG. 818 � D.B. 1451, PG. 984 L37 N11"2757E 72.47'
' PIN: 5010-20-80-3191 ° PIN: 5010-20-80-8225
g L38 S3205'16'W 80.64'
L37 �; L25 �•B s� L39 N6752'32'W 224.72'
Ln n �••���•`•� E•B b63¢�" L41 N8f'58591Y 77.43'
AREA C-1 ��•.��I•�•. 0., �h'ppg/1 \ \ L42 5112$21 w 78.34'
0.532 ACRES «s L3 sABSo L4� N815859 w 144.12'
�w s tiF 9'
N/F ���(1 �., rrp q 5//g" \. TIE LINE TABLE
HULL BROTHERS LUMBER t� F'• �'- AREA B-1 <,ERB \ LINE BEARING DISTANCE TYPE.
COMPANY, INC. �� 1 2 \ 17 N72'2T23E 34.31' nE
78 N73-17 09 E 34.04' PL
D.B. 456, PG. 49 �� L . Ti i�.'- , 4.771 ACRES P \ 79 N7T4502 E 3247 nE
D.B. 489, PG. 1 G`Z� E.B 6 i9
PIN: 5010-00-50-5252 c 75 g • �PA OV Qv \ik
T10 N1 2821'E 9375' PL
Pe ERB TAD'
r11 N75'5224w 186.60' PL
��/ O` O� �0 REF. 2 h 0° T13 S8455 "E 125.26' PL
`` 79`�¢2S�� T14 S21'1109 W 99.54' PL
Point of ' M 260 18' h/C Z27 00.e. ns S6T56'�2� 1 93' PL
Beginning 5`,8 •-``- /`/9¢3,18A s6 A .77 5�8 G 1-1 J /1,4 Dty 70g976• '?7E=TIE ONLY PL=PROPERTY LINE PE
B ���� . 6Y �87. S' `f ERB ` (P4� / SygR AYN�N F • t
1
�39 �����r.��.'�' �2s�' HERB" pe. a& N OAv ANDL i 2"
3 is e e
��� �� �">� 3s8 p/N: S PG 16 PG ANp and Wire,. r_ 014
N F N) � x 6). p L22 / 979• 12S 66ER AXLEc'--
RANDY E. MOSER and wife, ��E�B" 2 5�7•'Nsi�,x x x x x x x �SO L21 n„5�8 08' 89�oc O
DONNA B. MOSER AREA `rC-L" `�97 x x x x ' `S,,6' 796 ne
D.B. 1555, PG. 902 �6 5�' D / AXLE
PN:P.B. 3 919-028779T0296 ract 3 0.473 ACRES /Vj2xxxx�Cx x' P.O.B. 5 8 3 ��� `3s86 3F E/B" n If
E(2B
��� 38SO'7" �f x :��o t1� = a� �' �' Eta\ 80 67 I�A(t S6� AREA 35 ACRES
n rr 41 P.D.B. NCGS 'AIR VIEW"
�� AREA D 8 738ti o NAD83 (NSRS20 1 t)
REF. 3 L43 L42 Nj E'B �`
0.602 ACRES / 1 •s°8�8 \ s 1 NN.C 999,400.46D us Fr
2 (I 2g ly 5 s" Oct a IfJ)
ry��° QR°=E AREA rrErI A �' � 89- �� E 1,52D,179.1D USFT
0. 143 ACRES � �8 t EBB EI�,.: - ,
AREA "F" N663o �E e
REF. 4 / ¢83s 6 y N: 999,357.44 USFT
ERB E B ' �`�� ry E: 1,51 9,391.40 USFT
5/8" 5/8' \ 1.225 ACRES 6' w_
R C / // �, T12 „ T13
5 8" EIP" REF. 5 �IJ Ef26" 5/8"RB L32 5//8 �IE� 5 8" 1/2'
I Ef2B"
5/8" ERB REF• 1.5"EIP next to E B EIP 1 i
ERB n ' 30' 39"White Oak of I Span.b O k O / ' S 86'52'28" W
5/8" ' 30' ACCESS EASEMENT 3 4"
ERB
_ 788.87'GROUND
RI 1 „E/P /ce 'GRID)
// E B P.B. 34, PG. 125 L_ - - - - - L f
ERB"
MoS�R/ Q i COMBINED GRID
/ FACTOR=1.00005764
DEBORAH NSA F BEASLEY, - - CLETIUS - „5�8" 30' ACCESS EASEMENT r- _ �/
P.B. 32, PG. 146 �,�/
GRETA M. BOYD, and P.B. 32, PG. 180 }
PORTIA M. OAKLEY 5//8'L_ - N/F ` /
D.B. 1561, PG. 29 ERB '-'5/8' BRADLEY JOSEPH LINEBERRY and wife, / /
D.B. 1555, PG. 895 ERB MINDY DIANA LINEBERY N/F //
P.B. 34, PG. 54 Tract 1 D.B. 1603, PG. 458 HOWARD EDWARDS and wife,
PIN: 5919-02-79-0094P.B. 34/ PG. 4 Tact 5
PIN: 59'19 085 88 r2864 SHARONETTE EDWARDS
D.B. 1561, PG. 32
P.B. 32, PG. 180 Tract 4
PIN: 5919-08-88-9985
I, ELISABETH G.TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SUMMARY LEGEND:
SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK AS , PAGE_ EASEMENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SHOWN ); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY PROPERTY EASEMENT AREA(ACRES) PROPERTY LINE
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE FACE OF - - LINE NOT SURVEYED
THIS MAP;THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1: 10,000 CFD REF. 2A- 5.542 TIE LINE
AND THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S.47-30 W W REF. 1 - JOHNSON - - • - EXISTING STREAM
AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION N/F N/F N/F W `
NUMBER,AND SEAL THIS 15th DAY OF FEBRUARY,2019.\ �,„�I I i i�I/7/7 G. EDDIE JOHNSON and wife, DEBORAH M. BEASLEY, SHAWN A. MOSER and wife, PIN: 5010-00-71 -3049 A-2 9. OO - - - - EX. EASEMENT
'\� . •CAR Oi'%, CA D.B.0L S.1033,J PG. ON
PORTIAGRETA M.
BOYD, and LEY TTEBRES H.. 1555, MPOSER
898 A-3 1 .183
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
:4a L�� °'OFESS/Q,y• y % D.B. 233, PG. 179 D.B. 1555, PG. 895 P.B. 32, PG. 180, Tract 2 - - -
- RIGHT OF WAY (GIS)
PIN: 5010-00-71-3049 P.B. 34, PG. 125, Tract Two PIN: 5919-02-79-1649 REF. 2 - BEASLEY, B- 1 4.771EASEMENT CORNER
LISABETH G.TURNER,P.L.S.#L-4440 Q� � = OWNER ADDRESS: PIN: 5010-20-70-7007 OWNER ADDRESS: BOYD, & OAKLEYREBAR & CAP SET
SEAL - 224 Beth Lane OWNER ADDRESS: 169 Scarlett Ln. PIN: 5010-20-70-7007 B-2 1 .835 © PROPERTY CORNER
L-4440 cr.- z Mt. Airy, NC 27030 286 Cletius Moser Trl. Mt. Airy, NC 27030 (DESCRIBED)
Mt. Ai NC 27030 C-1 0.532 EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE
��'p �,O ��� Airy,
REF. 3 - MOSER ERB EXISTING REBAR
' ,S•UR`I• • � PIN: 5919-02-79-1649 C-2 0.473
I, ELISABETH G. TURNER, PROFESSIONAL LAND'/��TH G. ��` \ REF. 4 CREF. 5 REF. 6 EIR EXISTING IRON ROD
�� N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
SURVEYOR # L-4440, CERTIFY TO ONE OR MORE OF x x x x x x x x x x REF. 4 - BEASLEY 0 CALCULATED CORNER
THE FOLLOWING AS INDICATED: N/F N/F N/F x x x x x PIN: 5919-00-79-7501 D 0.602 P.O.B. Point of Beginning
TERRYE for Legal
G. BEASLEY and wife, TERRY G. BEASLEY and wife, GRETA M. BOYD g Descriptions
X d. THAT THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY OF ANOTHER DEBORAH M. BEASLEY DEBORAH M. BEASLEY D.B. 320, PG. 98 REF. 5 - BEASLEY E PL PROPERTY LINE
CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF D.B. 489, PG. 1175 D.B. 1446, PG. 358 PIN: 5919-00-89-4216 PIN: 5919-08-89-1501 0. 143
EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR D.B. 315, PG. 169 PIN: 5919-08-89-1501 OWNER ADDRESS:
OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF PIN: 5919-00-79-7501 OWNER ADDRESS: 194 Cletius Moser Trl. ` REF. 6 - BOYD
SUBDIVISION. OWNER ADDRESS: 286 Cletius Moser Trl. Mt. Airy, NC 27030 � \. PIN: 5919-00-89-4216 F 1 .225
Cletius Moser Trl. Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Mt. 200' 0' 200' 400'
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
TOTAL EASEMENT AREA 25.406
I. I.
ELISABETH G.TURNER,P.L.S.#L-4440
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR CAD FILE:
NOTEs: P-o7o2 (919)-827-0745 ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION LLC RED BARN_CE_F
1 . SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 FOR GENERAL NOTES. LAND-
SURVEYING In WWW.turnerlandSurVe n1
y gCO RED BARNSCALE: 1"=200'
Certified CBE/wBE MITIGATION T I GAT T O N BANK SITE TE
SURVEYDATE: MAR. 2018 DRAWN BY: DST/EGT TLS PROJ.: 18-003 (USACE Action ID Number SAW-2018-1441 ) SHEET
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK , PAGE SURVEYED BY: DST REVIEWED BY: DST/EGT (PLAT DATE: 2/15/2019 MT. AIRY TOWNSHIP SURRY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 2 of 2