20180726 Ver 2_Modification Request Attachment_20210205 (4)

Michael Baker YEARS Making a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
February 5, 2021
Electronic Submittal of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Project
Submittal Interim Form
SUBJECT: Raleigh Executive Jetport(TTA)—South Terminal Development
Section 404 Permit Modification Request (SAW 2009-01114)
Section 401 Water Quality Certification Modification Request(20180726 v1)
On behalf of the Raleigh Executive Jetport (Airport), Michael Baker International, Inc. (Michael
Baker) is submitting a request to modify the Section 404 Permit (SAW 2009-01114 — April 30,
2019) and Section 401 Water Quality Certification (20180726 v1 —December 3, 2018) that were
previously issued for the expansion of the Raleigh Executive Jetport facility.
A modification is being requested from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to discharge fill materials into waters of
the U.S. incidental to additional expansion of the Raleigh Executive Jetport. The proposed
modification would result in an additional 0.047-acre of wetland impact. This impact would be
in addition to the previously authorized 0.48-acre of wetland impact and 138 linear feet of stream
impact.
As part of the evaluation process,a Categorical Exclusion has been approved by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation(NCDOT)-Division of Aviation(DOA),and a copy of the approved
document is being provided as an attachment to this permit application package. The Raleigh
Executive Jetport is located in Lee County, North Carolina, approximately 7.5 miles northeast of
Sanford(Appendix Al -Figure 1).
Please find attached, Supplemental Project Information, Mapping/Permit Drawings, and
supporting documentation.
If you have any questions, or require additional information,please contact me at(843) 745-8808
or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Michael Baker International
9_ cc,_„
Edward J. Smail
Environmental Technical Manager
Attachments
Cc: Project File (w/attachments)
4425 Belle Oaks Drive I North Charleston,SC 29405I Office:843-329-0050I Fax:[phone]I mbakerintl.com

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404/401 Modification Request
SAW 2009-01114 and 20180726 v1
i i
f 1
r
-;', ---"1"11LigicsmakaamikamighadidL
num
Iiiik.
Raleigh Executive Jetport
South Terminal Development
Lee County, North Carolina
February 2021
EXEC
for:
RA L E I G H EXEC Raleigh Executive Jetport
JETP 700 Rod Sullivan Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Prepared by:
Michael Baker Michael Baker International,Inc.
INTERNATIONAL 4425 Belle Oaks Drive
North Charleston, SC 29405

Supplemental Project Information
Project Information
1. Name of project: Raleigh Executive Jetport (TTA) - South Terminal Development
2. Location: The proposed project is located at the Raleigh Executive Jetport in Lee County
northeast of Sanford,North Carolina(refer to Figure 1). Take Exit 76 -Farrell Road(from
US 1 South) - Make Left onto Farrell Road - Travel Approximately 0.5-mile - Make Left
onto Rod Sullivan Road - Travel Approximately 1.0-mile - Arrive at Raleigh Executive
Jetport. The approximate center point of the project is located at 35.576808, -79.108483.
The nearest named waterway is Hughes Creek, which is located south of the project (all of
the project area drains to this named stream). The project is located within the Cape Fear
River Basin, 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030004. A location Map and project
area map(s) can be found in Appendix A.
3. Site Assessment: The 27-acre project study area consists of the existing maintained Airport
Operations Area(AOA). This area is maintained and kept in a grassed state and also includes
the existing impervious surfaces associated with the existing taxilanes, hangars, and apron
areas. The project study area also includes stormwater management features and a small area
of forested wetland located at the outfall of a non-jurisdictional stormwater pond. Photos of
the project study area are included in Appendix B.
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the project is
located within the Triassic Basin ecoregion (Level IV), which is described as having local
relief and elevations that are often less than in surrounding regions (45c, 45e, and 45f), and,
with rocks that are easier to erode, stream valleys that cross the region tend to widen.'
According to the GIS soil series data produced by the United States Department of
Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS), the soils types
identified within the survey area include Pinkston silt loam and Creedmoor fine sandy loam
(refer to Appendix A—Figure 3).
4. Project Description: The proposed project consists of additional development to the existing
hangar area located to the south of the existing terminal area. The proposed project includes
site preparations for three future box hangars/associated aprons, improvement of the current
taxilane(north of the existing t-hangars)to accommodate ADG II aircraft,and the connection
of the existing t-hangar taxilanes to a new`end-around'taxilane. The existing north taxilane
would be shifted and widened and would continue/extend behind the t-hangars. The
remaining five taxilanes would connect to the new pavement to create a complete taxilane
system. Rough grading and installation and re-routing of stormwater drainage would occur
to the north and west of the t-hangars to prepare sites for hangar development. The proposed
improvements are shown on Figure 4 (refer to Appendix Al).
The project also requires modification to the existing stormwater pond located at the southern
end of the project. The pond requires an increase in volume, addition of a spillway, and an
energy dissipator pad to accommodate run-off from the additional impervious surfaces for
' Griffith,G.E.,Omernik,J.M.,Comstock,J.A., Schafale,M.P.,McNab,W.H.,Lenat,D.R.,MacPherson,T.F.,Glover,
J.B.,and Shelburne,V.B.,2002,Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina,(color poster with map,descriptive
text, summary tables,and photographs):Reston,Virginia,U.S. Geological Survey(map scale 1:1,500,000)
1

the previously described improvements (refer to attached Permit Drawings — Appendix
A2). Impacts to Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) would only result from the improvements
required at the pond outfall,the remaining work areas would not result in impacts to WOUS.
5. Purpose and Need: The improvements are needed to satisfy a growing demand for corporate
hangar space at the Airport. The increase in corporate tenants will also result in employment
and economic growth for the Airport and the surrounding community. In its existing
condition,the Airport does not have sufficient corporate hangar space to meet current market
demand. Increasing the functionality of the facilities at the Airport to meet today's corporate
standards would help to draw the desired commercial and industrial businesses the region is
seeking. The Airport plays a significant role in contributing to the economy of the region.
The Airport's economic role is anticipated to grow, just as aviation-related activity is
forecasted to grow over the next 20-year period.
Most large companies utilize corporate aircraft in their day-to-day operations. A community
without adequate airport facilities is at a disadvantage in the corporate marketplace.
Communities offering well-designed and attractive airports can better accommodate the
needs of corporate users. Companies considering new locations and expansions are more
likely to have interest in locations with readily available aviation transportation facilities.
With a global economy, business travel is conducted at greater distances requiring larger
aircraft with greater range. In addition,just in time manufacturing requires timely delivery
of raw materials and subcomponents in order to keep inventory costs low. The proposed
improvements would allow for additional growth of corporate aircraft utilizing the facility.
Large international companies in the vicinity of the Airport include:
• Moen;
• Wyeth;
• Coty;
• Tyson; and,
• Caterpillar.2
Based on a 2019 North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT) study,the Raleigh
Executive Jetport currently has an annual economic impact of 61 million dollars generating
over 470 jobs.3 Development of additional corporate and industrial facilities at the Airport
would continue to drive this vital economic engine. The area within and around the Airport
is mapped in Plan SanLee as an industrial center.4 Construction of the proposed facilities
would require material and services from businesses within the local economy and as the
Airport grows, employment opportunities at the Airport would increase as aircraft and
aircraft-related businesses expand. Potential industrial/commercial development planned by
Lee County and the City of Sanford would benefit from increased capacity at the Raleigh
Executive Jetport. In turn,the region would benefit from employment and economic benefits
provided by additional industrial and commercial development.
2 Lee County Economic Development. Economic Development Overview
https://leecountync.gov/Departments/EconomicDevelopment(January 7,2021).
3 North Carolina Department of Transportation. Economic Impacts of Airport in North Carolina.
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/State-Airport-
Aid/State%20Airport%20Aid%20Documents/Economic%201mpact%20Brochure%20(Jan%202019).pdf(January 7,
2021).
a City of Sanford,Long Range Planning,Plan SanLee.https://plansanlee.com(January 7,2021).
2

For example, the Moncure Mega Site is located approximately 7.0 miles from the Airport.
The Moncure Mega Site is a 2,500-acre property,with the potential to include approximately
8 million square feet of development.5 Marketing materials for the Moncure Mega Site
specifically tout the proximity and usage of Raleigh Executive Jetport for executive aircraft.6
The proposed project would strengthen the economic role of the Airport by supporting the
existing users, as well as attracting future users in need of corporate hangar space. The
Airport represents a stable economic provider within the region, and it directly provides jobs,
wages, and production to the economy.
6. Does this project have independent utility? Yes, this project is not dependent on any other
project to meet its need and purpose.
7. Waters of the U.S.(WoUS): The project study area is within the area that was delineated and
permitted during the construction of the Airport in the early 2000's and no jurisdictional
features were identified and/or impacted(refer to Appendix C).
In addition, the area south of the project was field delineated in October of 2019 (refer to
map in Appendix C). The upper limits of jurisdictional resources terminated downstream
of the existing stormwater pond. The project study area drains to the stormwater pond via
the gully/ditches and neither of these resources were identified as jurisdictional features. The
gully/ditch that drains the project study area does not connect to a jurisdictional feature
(wetland identified as Wetland W3 in the delineation mapping) until it exits the stormwater
pond to the southeast. These areas were field reviewed/verified by the USACE on January
29, 2020.
8. Approved JD: The delineation was field reviewed by the USACE on January 29,2020 and the
approval is pending (see Appendix C).
II. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States
Impacts to waters of the U.S. would occur due to the placement of an energy dissipator pad at
the outfall of the existing stormwater pond. The pad would consist of rip-rap and result in
0.007-acre of fill in a jurisdictional wetland. The dissipator pad would be set below existing
ground elevation on geotextile fabric and would also be set below the elevation of the existing
outfall (refer to Sheet 3 of the Permit Drawings in Appendix A2). This would allow for
the dissipation of erosive forces associated with additional impervious surfaces in order to meet
state water quality design standards. An additional 0.04-acre of permanent clearing impact
would be required for installation and maintenance of the stormwater control feature.
The wetland impacts associated with the proposed project are quantified in Table 1,below.
Moncure Mega Site. Informational Brochure.
https://static 1.squarespace.com/static/58e4e03 5414fb56455f5c504/t/5908a129a5790ae9a252270f/1493737797976/Monc
ure-Brochure.pdf(January 7,2021).
6 Moncure Megs Site. Transportation.https://www.moncuremegasite.com/transportation/(January 7,2021).
3

Table 1
Wetland Impacts
Site#- Impact Type Wetland Forested? Type of Impact Area
Reason for Type Wetland Name Jurisdiction (Ac.)
Impact
Wetland Permanent Headwater W3 Yes Both 0.007
Impact—1 Fill Forest
(Airport
Development—
Stormwater
Control)
Wetland Permanent Headwater W3 Yes Both 0.04
Impact—1 Clearing Forest
(Airport
Development—
Stormwater
Control)
TOTAL 0.047
The proposed project plans are included in Appendix A.
III. Alternatives Analysis
Basic Purpose
The Basic Purpose of the proposed project is to provide aircraft storage and access facilities.
Water Dependency
Since the Basic Purpose of the proposed project does not require access,proximity, or sighting
within or near a special aquatic site, the proposed project is not water dependent.
Overall Project Purpose
The Overall Project Purpose is to expand the hangar facility at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
Geographic Review Area
The existing Airport property was determined to be the geographic review area due to costs
associated with land acquisition, limitations to expansion along the western edge of the Airport
property boundary due to the presence of an existing railroad, and distance from existing
facilities that would be required to utilize an entirely off-property site.
A completely off-site alternative would require the relocation of the entire Airport. In addition
to being cost prohibitive due to the size and linear nature of the Airport, and the surrounding
topography, reconstruction of the Airport on an upland site is highly improbable. Therefore,
the development of an alternative completely off-site of Airport property was eliminated from
further consideration as a practicable alternative.
Selection of Alternative Sites
The following elements were used as screening criteria to select sites for the proposed project:
• Meets FAA Design Standards;
• Size (approximately 10 acres);
• Accommodation of site layout;
• Proximity to existing Airport facilities; and,
4

• Costs.
The site would need to meet FAA design standards for the design to be approved by NCDOT
(per criteria defined by FAA in AC 150/5300-13A - Airport Design). In order to
accommodate the proposed layout and associated stormwater management features, a site size
of 10 acres was utilized. A practicable site would also need to have sufficient space within the
10 acres to accommodate the site development. A site would also need to allow for safe and
efficient access to aircraft support services, such as the terminal, fueling stations, and
maintenance facilities. Costs and associated constructability issues were a critical element of
site selection, since public funding for Airport development is limited.
Three potential on-site alternatives were studied to determine the optimal location for the
proposed facility, which minimize impacts to the natural and human environment to the
maximum extent practicable, meet all FAA design standards, and best serve the needs of the
Airport and travelling public. Potential alternative sites are detailed on Figure 5 in Appendix
Al. The no-build alternative was eliminated from further study since it would not meet the
purpose and need of the proposed project (providing hangar space to drive economic
development). Off-site alternatives were eliminated from further study due to costs associated
with land acquisition, limitations to expansion along the western edge of the Airport property
boundary due to the presence of an existing railroad, and distance from existing facilities.
Alternative Sites Screened for Practicability(refer to Figure 5 in Appendix A)
Alternative Site One (north and adjacent to existing hangars)
This layout would occur directly adjacent to the existing hangar space on the south side
of the terminal building.
Alterative Site Two (west of southern end of Runway 3/21)
This layout would occur on the west side of the southern Runway end, south of the
existing general aviation hangars.
Alternative Site Three (eastern side of airport)
This layout was used to determine the feasibility of locating the proposed project on
the eastern side of the existing runway.
As shown in Table 2 below the no-Build alternative was eliminated from consideration since
it did not meet the purpose and need of the proposed project.
Impracticable Sites
Currently,the Airport does not have a parallel taxiway on the east side of the runway;therefore,
Alternative 3 would require the construction of a new parallel taxiway in order to be a viable
option. Additionally, all of the Airport's support services facilities are located on the west side
of the Airport property, and any aircraft desiring to use those facilities would be required to
taxi across the existing runway to gain access. This would create an unsafe environment on
the airfield. Due to the costs and safety concerns associated with Alternative 3,this alternative
was determined to be an impracticable option.
7 Federal Aviation Administration. AC 150/5300-13A-Airport Design.
https://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.current/documentNumber/150_5300-
13 (January 21,2021).
5

Table 2
Practicable Alternative Screening Matrix
Criteria No-Build Alternative One Alternative Alternative Three
Alternative Two
Meets FAA No Yes Yes Yes
Design Criteria
Meets Size No Yes Yes Yes
Threshold
Large Enough to No Yes Yes Yes
Accommodate
Site Layout
Proximity to N/A Yes Yes No
Existing
Facilities
Cost Prohibitive No No No Yes A
Practicable Site No Yes Yes _ No _
Shaded cells indicate elimination factors.
For the proximity screening criteria, two things were taken into consideration. The first
consideration was the need to keep hangar facilities close to existing service, fueling, and
maintenance facilities, as well as amenities provided at the terminal for the Airport's corporate
clients. For the facility to remain connected to the existing hangar/terminal area complex, a
screening distance of approximately 1,000-feet was used, which would be the maximum
distance where the development would still be part of the existing terminal/hangar complex.
Secondly, a hangar facility being located on the opposite side of the runway from the existing
terminal/hangar complex creates logistical/safety issues with aircraft having to taxi across an
active runway to access this area.
The screening cost is$4.11 million,which is the amount proposed to be allocated to the project
through State Strategic Transportation Infrastructure (STI) funds and or federal funding.
Alternative Three is cost prohibitive due to property acquisition costs and the need to construct
an approximately 800-foot-long taxiway connector to connect to the existing runway. The
estimated combined cost of the property acquisition and taxiway connector would add
approximately $650,000 to the baseline $4.11 million-dollar project cost.
Practicable Sites
Utilizing the defined screening criteria,two potential alternatives(in additional to the No-Build
Alternative)were identified as potential locations for the proposed hangar layout(Alternatives
One and Two). The site footprint that was used to compare alternative impacts, encompassed
the area needed for development and stormwater management. In comparing the two
Alternatives, Alternative One would impact more wetlands, while Alternative Two would
impact more streams (refer to Table 3). Neither Alternative is anticipated to have impacts to
federally listed species and/or cultural resources. Alternative Two would also have a higher
project cost when compared to Alternative One due to the need to redesign and construct new
stormwater management facilities (already in place for Alternative One), and the need to
provide an additional access point to the taxiway(Alternative One can utilize existing taxiway
connectors and taxilanes). There is also an existing septic drain field in the location for
Alternative Two the serves the southern portion of the Airport, which would need to be
6

relocated or abandoned to utilize this area. Since Alternative One would have less stream
impacts, lower project costs, and no issues with utility conflicts, it was determined to be the
Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA).
Table 3
Practicable Alternative Comparison
Factors No-Build Alternative One Alternative Two
Alternative
Environmental
Stream Impacts None 0 100
(Linear Feet)
Wetland Impacts None 0.047 0.000
(Acres)
Federally Listed None None None
Species
Cultural Resources None None None
Other Factors
Project Costs None Lower Higher
Utility Concerns None None Yes
LEDPA No Yes No
IV. Avoidance & Minimization
Due to the linear nature of the proposed project and the location of the wetland,total avoidance
of aquatic resources was not feasible. Impacts are confined to the minimum extent required to
construct the project as proposed.
To minimize temporary impacts to water quality, the contractor would be required to comply
with erosion and sediment control measures as specified in FAA AC 150/5370-10 entitled
Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports, and specifically Item P-156 Temporary Air
and Water Pollution, Soil Erosion, and Siltation Control. All temporary stormwater
management techniques would be designed to ensure they are not in conflict with AC 5200-
33B,Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports.
A variety of measures would be employed to control sediment runoff and prevent erosion
during construction of this project. Drop inlets and culvert inlet protection would be used to
prevent sediment from entering the pipe system and a sequence of riprap check dams would
be used to control sediment in the grassed drainage ditches on the site. Additional sediment
would be contained using a temporary sediment trap and a stormwater wet detention basin.
Silt fence would be used to contain sediment runoff from slopes and to protect adjacent
wetlands during construction. A combination of Type 1 and Type 3 erosion control matting
would be used on side slopes and in ditches to prevent erosion and enable growth of permanent
vegetation.
7

V. Mitigation
Mitigation for wetland impacts would occur in the form of payment to the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Program. A copy of the approval letter is included
in Appendix D.
VI. Floodplains
The project study area is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency
designated mapped floodplain.8
VII. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
No historic/cultural resources listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places are located in the Area of Potential Effect. The State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO)had'No Comment' on the proposed project(refer to Appendix E).
VIII. Threatened and Endangered Species
Based on available data (aerial mapping, USGS Topographic Mapping, Soil Survey Data,
NCNHP Elemental Occurrence Database, USFWS/NCNHP Habitat descriptions), and field
reviews, habitat for federally and/or state-listed species is not present within the footprint of
the proposed project.
Federally listed species taken into consideration include:
• Cape fear shiner(Notropis mekistocholas);
• Red-cockaded woodpecker(Picoides borealis);
• Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocepahlus); and,
• Harperella(Ptilimnium nodosum).9
For the Cape Fear shiner and harperella, no streams occur within the project study area.
Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would have No Effect on these species.
Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker and bald eagle is not present within the
project study area. The study area largely consists of grassed/maintained areas and impervious
surfaces. The only forested area is a small fringe of trees located near the outfall of the existing
stormwater pond. These trees are not large/old enough to provide nesting habitat for red-
cockaded woodpecker and/or bald eagle. In addition, there are no large water bodies for bald
eagle foraging located within the project study area. Therefore, since habitat is not present,
implementation of the proposed project would have No Effect on the red-cockaded
woodpecker or the bald eagle.
8 North Carolina Flood Risk Information System,DFIRM 3710966600K,
http://fris.nc.gov/frishardfiles/nc/hardfiles/DFIRM/105/DFIRM NC 3710966600K.pdf(December 30,2020).
9 U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Endangered Species,Threatened Species,and Candidate Species,
Lee County,North Carolina,(Updated July 17,2020),https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/lee.html(January 7,
2021).
8

IX. Essential Fish Habitat(EFH)
No EFH is located within the project study area, and no EFH coordination with the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — National Marine Fisheries Service would be
required.
X. 401 Water Quality and Ocean and Coastal Resources
The project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification, and it is anticipated that a Section
401 Water Quality Certification will be issued in conjunction with a Section 404 General
Permit. The project is not located in a defined coastal zone and no tidal waters are located
within the project area;therefore,no coordination with the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management would be required.
XI. Wild and Scenic Rivers
No federal Wild and Scenic Rivers are located within the survey area and no federal Wild and
Scenic Rivers would be affected by the project.
XII. Secondary and/or Cumulative Impacts
No indirect/secondary/induced impacts would be expected to occur as a result of the proposed
project.
The construction of the Airport resulted in the introduction of additional impervious surfaces
to an undeveloped area. Future Airport improvements would also likely result in the
construction of additional impervious surfaces. These additional impervious surfaces could
increase the amount of stormwater runoff into nearby surface waters. However, the Proposed
Action and other future improvements impacting greater than one acre would be required to
complete the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process
and a review of the Stormwater Management Plan prior to construction. These efforts would
minimize the amount of stormwater runoff entering into surface waters and result in avoidance
of cumulative impacts to water quality near the Airport.
Past impacts to wetlands and streams have occurred from residential, commercial, and
industrial development within and adjacent to the Airport. Impacts to wetlands include
permanent and temporary filling, draining, and other forms of alternation. In addition,natural
streams within the area have also been channelized for silviculture and agriculture.
Executive Order 11990 and the CWA Section 404 process have dramatically reduced the rate
of wetland loss; however, wetland loss is likely to continue as development of the area
continues. The protection of wetlands is regulated on a case-by-case basis by state and federal
agencies and mitigation for permitted impacts is typically required. To fill wetlands or other
waters of the United States,a permit would have to be granted by USACE prior to construction
of projects and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from NCDEQ would also be
required. Mitigation may be required for impacts, which would offset the wetland loss
associated with future development projects. Therefore, with USACE and NCDEQ oversight
as well as mitigation requirements, the potential impacts to wetlands from future projects
occurring in the area would be minimized.
9

The Proposed Action is anticipated to result in approximately 0.047-acre of wetland impact.
In addition, future development at the Airport could potentially result in impacts to wetlands
and other jurisdictional waters of the United States. The Cape Fear River Basin is estimated
to contain 6,386 miles of stream and 68,884 acres of water resources.10" Impacts resulting
from the Proposed Action would affect a minute percent of stream length and wetland acreage
when compared to the totals within the river basin. As a result, no significant cumulative
impacts to streams/wetlands on and in the vicinity of the Airport would be anticipated.
Past and present residential and commercial development in the vicinity of the project study
area has impacted wetlands and streams such as Hughes Creek and its tributaries. These
activities will continue in the future regardless of the status of the Proposed Action, and the
cumulative effects from implementation of the Proposed Action are not expected to result in
an increase of negative impacts to wetlands and/or streams.
Therefore, no significant cumulative impacts are anticipated.
XIII. Public Interest Review Factors
A Categorical Exclusion was completed for the proposed project and is included in Appendix
F.
Table 9: Public Interest Factors Effects
c a)
m a)
C ,_ "-' al "- O U_
0Z
z a) C) c Q
a) zE z co
0
1. Conservation: See below for discussion. X
2. Economics: See below for discussion. X
3. Aesthetics: See below for discussion. X
4. General Environmental Concerns: See below for X
discussion.
5. Wetlands: See below for discussion. X
6. Historic Properties: See below for discussion. X
7. Fish and Wildlife Values: See below for X
discussion.
8. Flood Hazards: N/A X
9. Floodplain Values: N/A X
10. Land Use: See below for discussion. X
'°NCDWQ,Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan,2005.p.,xxii,
hops://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/PlanningBPUBPU/Cape_Fear/Cape%20Fear%20Plans/2006%20Plan/exec
utive%20summary.pdf(January 7,2021).
11 NCDEQ.Cape Fear River Basin,https://deq.nc.gov/cape-fear-river-basin(January 7,2021).
10

Table 9: Public Interest Factors Effects
ca) a)
c a) I
a' .- o (0
Z E°' � _' C c Za
Z E Z m
0 �.
11. Navigation: N/A
X
12. Shoreline Erosion and Accretion: N/A X
13. Recreation: N/A X
14. Water Supply and Conservation: See below for X
discussion.
15. Water Quality:: See below for discussion. X
16. Energy Needs: See below for discussion. X
17. Safety: See below for discussion. X
18. Food and Fiber Production: N/A X
19. Mineral Needs: N/A X
20. Consideration of Property Ownership: See below X
for discussion.
21. Needs and Welfare of the People: See below for X
discussion.
Conservation
The proposed project is located entirely within Airport property and would not impact any
areas under local, state, and/or federal conservation.
Economics
The proposed project would result in additional economic development, which would have a
beneficial effect on the Airport and the surrounding area(refer to discussion in Section I.5—
Purpose and Need).
Aesthetics
The Proposed Action would not modify the existing viewshed from its current state as a hangar
area.
General Environmental Concerns
No general environmental concerns have been identified as part of the proposed project. The
project was submitted to the State Environmental Review Clearinghouse for review and the
comments are included in Appendix E.
Wetlands
As described in Section II-Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States,the proposed
project would result in 0.047-acre of wetland impact for the placement of rip-rap at an existing
11

pond outfall. As described in Section V— Mitigation, these impacts would be mitigated via
the purchase of credits from the NCDMS,which would help to ensure a no-net loss of wetland
resources.
Historic Properties
As described in Section VII - Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, no
impacts to Section 106 Resources are anticipated to occur.
Fish and Wildlife Values
As described in Section VIII—Threatened and Endangered Species,no impacts to federally
listed species are anticipated to occur as a result of the proposed project.
Land Use
The proposed project would occur entirely within Airport property and would not modify the
existing land use,which is currently functioning as a hangar area.
Water Supply and Conservation
According to the NCDEQ, Hughes Creek is classified as WS-IV waters, which is defined as
waters used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes
where a WS-I, II or III classification is not feasible. The proposed project would be designed
in accordance with state and federal water quality standards, which will be verified during the
Section 401 Water Quality Certification and NPDES permitting process.
Water Quality
To minimize temporary impacts to water quality, the contractor would be required to comply
with erosion and sediment control measures as specified in FAA Advisory Circular (AC)
150/5370-10 entitled Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports, and specifically Item
P-156 Temporary Air and Water Pollution, Soil Erosion, and Siltation Control. All temporary
stormwater management techniques would be designed to ensure they are not in conflict with
AC 5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports. In addition, a state-
approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan would be required to ensure that the proposed
project meets state and federal stormwater control requirements.
Energy Needs
The increase in power usage would be comparable to that of the existing hangars and would
not be expected to significantly alter or overly burden the power supply in the general vicinity.
Safety
All design elements of the proposed project are designed in accordance with FAA AC
150/5300-13A- Airport Design, which ensures that all FAA airport safety requirements are
met. Project designs require review and approval from the NCDOT—Division of Aviation to
ensure compliance with design standards.
Consideration of Property Ownership
The proposed project would occur entirely within the existing Airport Property.
Needs and Welfare of the People
The project would result in minimal environmental impacts, and all impacts would be
mitigated to offset their adverse effects. As a result, implementation of the project would not
12

have a negative effect on the needs and welfare of the people. Since the purpose of the proposed
project is economic development, it is anticipated to have a beneficial effect on economic
growth and employment.
13

Appendix Al
RALEIGHEXEC
JETPORT
• Project Mapping
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

LOCATION MAP (•:1 - � r r ' ',' �, � s •�'1 n� ' \l ; i,
\\--..........;_7::-_A..
�'•. d1 1 . / --1��/. wiltilli Art Legend
� A, r ' -;-(_____. , r� �k—// -- . - 1-----,
� �J — Existing Facilities
'+�Y y ., --ti ] -,� / m — —Airport Property Boundary
.;'.• 1
� �; I ):t \-/ U/ �� � — —Nr`�'ir� '�• .��1 .�j� �� �j- / _ T f-� `�II�1 I•- Q Project Study Area Boundary
3' 4' -• - (--' L'ar/r. )--,::,,/! P----- ,,A,N V:\ ) V-N-- ,,,____,„1/ 1 / ,. ., r ,,,' 1'\I 1-`,----- /. .. i
' .i. -ib , ' .,L___,,_ rojrf,,Thr---c--\---,..,',,,,\'...ebir.. oom \\,,, 1 \. 8---- , 2:(4-F,'
---- .-- ,,,' --4- i '•• ,. •
- r-s_IN Vor 1 1 •
\s, -4 17-1,,Tht \---.) iiii ilit Ay , 1 ./ , _
v.
:j ____1._1111.! -cp..dii ,
------------ \ ' .%) -(,111C\_,--)'
(i -.. ,c,c‘ i %'---!illPp i { //1/: -; '--\-- ' , - H
- .-._ _ -3 ir.,\ f\. ( N .1 n. f J ly. j\1
)AN' . i'LL7-_y-- ... ,://, i -'\ Of (ill::.:--' _4_-
. .1; r u ,\. ,\ , . ,-,_ ,,L_,- _ --,
\ r,;3-C-- '‘‘._. -) ' ' 1,_____ ///// '
Pr.e+173° ) -.. I3‘ )71r\I //Al I,
1 '4.\1.. 4,;,„- u .-1.i . o / .7 I '+7=',' .4 —. .--- ,t F t \-,
ir . //Ai, 0 ..„____L,;,(3,.),.. ,,,,„ )\
..,.x. ,?,...,-- . _ •
,. er, ......;)„,.. r, \., .._\.,, /
.--? ."") i .t. k... N,),"---r,•_. /4, \,,--_-,--_-!...2.,o ) ..\:,.....\\/tiliz.:il ( 7- „ ii
/ .4%„,,--../ .„---------D ._I.. _. „ J4., .. ,,_ „..._ /- ..,_,---/./-fr-
iir • -; .1..„ ..),,,,,..._s.:\A /AO i ,,,, . .(,,,,, N. Vile L IVAN ki--L-r-10/ !alb...,W4 A.
alillpir
• a fir,f-� PROJECT STUDY AREA „ / , /�y�� rr I '' rr.,_r 1?::---
::\.:::. • iiir--;'\, 'C';'C''';'4'1
ti. , �� ©S �� _ ate., t I L�� V.
f, ,,,
--,/ .. .----- ---.i .g/ifrarA,,k e5NO'
/' N .'-.... ti/ 1...'i.'ri 1 li .V7 .. ir 1 r ,/'. ***T -;- / IMF ,
'''' '' .1.--Th\-''..-2.:<.\ .---'.. .' "Z.:_•,, .
t'S
4;--'
��I 'ri 1� //1 ' y 7 CN,,if_ii.:
tt vo �Y y 1 ' //i 1 \‘.�I 3s 1 ti
\''''S 44 °T,} Z ___._ J____
„ ik,
,.._-/ ' kIL::(---.11::)____) 113 :\ '- ----% - 'Yji ;
"Sp
.. \_) \ Iff ._.) I 1 / `;,''' ' f ..),7- N...
'' .\\-ir ,.-11-._,„
it:
E%4%
` `$ \ )2\ k
I' fin- - . �J— •mayI\ .,,,,., �\ 1
..__,e)'-'7,% -
, 6 ,
.......
: 1
' J \_,_20'0:_,} ii
fr - ► +• .!
i _ 11 ;l�(f ` .:, i',l: T-� L 1 L_�,_i i I
II
Virginia t ail'' ,''''�0 RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
�R� �L� j CHATHAM WAKE.;
Tennessee Rp# Witt 1) )T.
4600�I ! �11a ��� � �\ 1 I- N SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
�.�.�� �{-���� * 1 Vq,I I LEE COUNTY,N.C.
+""� iLldrifraii3O���` �� Location s \ �- • DATE:JANUARY 11,2021
4111140lia 1 f { p'•.r��°0� MONCURE 7.5'USGS TOPO
South Carolina / � ~� HARNETT V 1 [ I FIGURE 1 OF 5
Georgia Lee County � '� Atlantic ! v }' -1' MOORE r -- l 0 1,000 2,000
S �� Feet
Ocean ��.) n /� 2Y0 -Ina:-..,1.
na ati 1 inch=2,000 feet

STUDY AREA � " i/
//// 7 , -.. 4 P7 illif i I 4
4LIP:-0- ..,.. .4. 41.4e_ 4:(1.,414::.44:!•tf4N14:...44,4:711_--;.t:././/:.7. . i.
PROJECT STUDY AREA i/ .y` / , f' /1.
/ i
i
5'''i /�q
_
/ y/ • V
i
, -------,..**,_!, ft, .... dr
..
�y
• W / // 1 • y/ /// .....
k
*•- ; /// /•
i 's__ : _ W.
♦ ♦ ♦ 2 =_ i y /i i
loIr .
// ' // i mac:: . ' � ♦♦ . � = y
i
i ♦♦ �z4 ♦♦♦ 11
yi i/ / 7....,
'•`,�Or ♦♦♦ a.
/ ` ti` , _� •
Stormwater Pond j ,i - , ♦♦ ���� , Legend
/ i .. ���� t. -Existing Facilities
i / / .. 4/ '1"'' — —Airport Property Boundary
I f � ♦ Delineated Streams
i/ r e r ' " Q Project Study Area Boundary
� �` <.`:< Delineated Wetland
1111111/11
// ;
r. �'` Stormwater Pond
y
, V Agr/ffMlhiiiM
j/ i/ �1 -L � ' y RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
i / / Jurisdictional Wetland y
/ / SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
/ N LEE COUNTY,N.C.
iti Jurisdictional Stream `
// DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021
i// r ~ ESRI WORLD IMAGERY
i ✓ ;�'in%P�C' �� •� T ::_200
•

S1oLjçYrI - i--i
A /J i i yl]SD ---N 7
'A •
, // / �i
ti i / / 11. '
Mfg -7o ; CrB ,' �a'I
.r.. .4)
Ch /
/ 1 i �i WsD
' CrD F'f[7/) 7 / a
/�% CrB i k.
MfB CrB ,/ / , /,. I�.
PROJECT STUDY AREA / 1 Q
/ 1
WsB J N
(d „... ..
ROD SV -- c„
N 1
a /
' ::- / r/ ://..‘c,
W5D wA
MfB '14--i/Mt y ;;v� CrBQ
MfD , ; v � ,
�.SB
i C rB — c-,/ ./ �'�\ WsB
1 1 % / i \�
❑ ° / t i �\ '
-12?"
...
i/�., % � W S D \\� .11
r Ws8
MfB Ch ' ;,' / PfB �;,,,
t4 L /� /i� CrB ,./ =, �-- - - - -
rB
/\/' !!:!f g ,I i Ri C rB
Ch i � _ I '
\ AI . I .
/ I
II ► / I 1 1
i
1G Mfg %/ I4i,
I �^ j RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
M f D % ',/' I!!I _ . Pi i
1 4 'e is N SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
jreMfB ! /. LEE COUNTY, N.C.
j (1I + DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021
i NRCS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
/
Legendr .,../ .�r.,./
i : a FIGURE 3 OF 5
---Airport Property Boundary1.....:::/1/..?,/
! il
I7 f D C rB 0 500 1,000
0 Project Study Area Boundary 0,/ f �� t Feet
'-�/ , �� 1 inch=1,000 feet

i1T
9 endProject Srea Boundary
Ex• lY4 i itt• * --Airport Property Boundary
'� i/ • /� I ••• Limits of Disturbance
PROJECT STUDY AREA, , • — •NPDES Silt Fence
27.1 AC Ir
i' I Proposed Hangars
a' y„ I Proposed Fuel Pad
/ Proposed New Pavement
- - - - - - - - - - - -/ / . . - Locations
7111014140441114p414111414 .
r i
' . 't4'74L-'• // i //
: : "W it # i 'if
r
itillt 17 /....-1 c iv 41.14,y4— ti,/
r /
44, sr
42 L Proposed Hangars /it.„_.... 40 i/ A
= eIL....
41,
.' .:1,1!:41;liq :A ‘P /// / // AWY . : : . i * • i‘iiiirr ,1 -/ ,_
1,,,
// /
. :...,_ ........
w. _ ,............. ... ..., i,,,
.p.,5_4.4..?..4 •/
1", . A* - /
, / .4041090, : :
/ 7 / Of. : . • • • • • ♦♦ • .
46,4zott ,,,,. ..N.: . Proposed Taxilane
h..i.. _. ...4.4,1
h' 1 Proposed Taxilane / / `. ♦♦ - - ♦♦.
/// Alf /./1/ . . . . . . . ; a •* , ----,1 r
Stormwater Pond �/ / / '� ♦ ���.e 1111 1 lir iiiii.
♦..
i r I
,,,,4_:'* * -,--- alir •4111P'ji .
//' ./ ,l'.-r,"---^ i• *I ,
/ ..:.:, \
i/ i I % 411„,* RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
• Wetland Impact at Pond Outfall �y
ij'� it ;�� (Riprap Pad & Clearing) SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
/i, 0.007 Acres of Fill N
// • 0.04 Acres of ClearingLEE COUNTY,N.C.
1 ` --4114 I DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021
/'/ •:� �. + ~ ESRI WORLD IMAGERY
i'///f ` Jurisdictional Wetland, bz 0 FIGURE O 4 OF 200
0.19 ac ' • + . • �'• `..�•
br r — Feet
//1 .w tiwar_ b! 1 inch=200 feet

ALTERNATIVES
I ...
A
Legend
' •. . / / f
I I I Alternative 1
Alternative 2
_0,. . . e 6 4.• • .„, ...
go iliti . i, / I I Alternative 3
• AP,' ..k.
: ti•• -Raleigh_Jetport_South_Streamsd,, 1;
I.
•
..
.....- 1 Raleigh_Jetport_South_Wetlands
I
9 -. .
.... . • .1"--'414714 .
4 • i . •
r ... ...
•,-,
49* ,
iii_ —
Emi - . . , T:,.. ,•,/ . ..—
., .._ oct.,„L
., R• r r : •-•: -.N..
. ., • iii Alt. 3 - Impracticable Site
r.:, '10 • , -' ..-s- 1 . ,
...At. 44:40 I r
1 .
4.11 tAr k 1 . • .--"•-'••... .:....„‘ , r- '. t , ,,,,' j.' L 1 " 0
')11. . irl'iti irt • •- . 1-* _ b
/
+
. ,. $
1 '
1 .
Q- •
•t•
.... . 1111104--- . .-,11 . A• 1 t ' .
fte 4.t. : r .
1 .
C° .'--.... ' X. d , •
.. e
Approx. 0.047-acre Wetland Impact-Alt. 1
‘• --
i
NII Raleigh
/
IIIIIIIIIIIO.'--
Eieative
-e II
J apiiii .,4,..
.: io' . .: II! ••:, . ;
' ‘'-• 1.1, '11c:, ,•\•J.: •
IIN • 1 1- - -.•
Approx. 100 LF Stream Impact -Alt. 2 t
iI .i RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
et
u.. .
g - SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
E ,•L'' NI LEE COUNTY N.C.
et - '-- - . DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021_
MONCURE 7.5'USGS TOPO
•• FIGURE 5 OF 5
0 350 700
II
Feet
1 inch=700 feet
l'ol.

Appendix A2
RALEIGH EXEC
JETPORT
Permit Drawings
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

EXISTING CONDITIONS Legend
_ \
\
HEADWATER FOREST WETLAND /11
—ExistingFacilities----- ____ADJACENT TO RPWPROJECT STUDY AREA — Airport PropertyBoundary
_ ---Delineated Stream
\\ =Project Study Area Boundary
1 1 Delineated Wetland
_ 77 Stormwater Pond
-4\_ EXISTING STORMWATER POND '-1 el _
JURISDICTIONAL _ —I__ -- * ---__
STREAM — C _ �Z—�
C II !
VIIIIIIIIIYIIIIIIIIIU
C C C C Cnunnu�iinuun�
_ - L InKul
I C C C C
U _ j
`— l 1 7 l 7' {� -
/\ A <> ‹....... b
_
J-T-t-T.L _LTT
V
t-T-LT-LT-t-T1T1T1T1T1T1 LT1TLTLTJ TJ_TJ_TJ_T1T1T1T T
TTTTT i— 7�
/ -
I T T T T T T T T � T T T T T T1j
T T T
I
0
/ - I RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
EXISTING AIRPORT FACILITIES
t SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
` LEE COUNTY N.C.
•
DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021
\ u MONCURE 7.5'USGS TOPO
o n•
SHEET 1 OF 3
`e ,° • e e e
n n I r ° ® ° 0 150 300
Feet
° e e • re ® 1 inch=300 feet

PROPOSED PLAN VIEW
Proposed New Hangars — \ j
PROJECT STUDY AREA
\
-----__ — \' Proposed New Taxilane/Aprons ! I
------- ____ _
__ -- — _ EXISTING STORMWATER POND - —
__ / I
=__ _ / Limits of Disturbance
— pv N.
-__— ------- _ — _
Ssii" .:--•
/ �;•�`, ` ��,. - — — Proposed New Hangars -____
/ N,_, -ION�/� 1 Legend
/
::::.. • —`'Delineated Stream
�' • • % • * Existing Facilities
— Airport Property Boundary
I ---Limits of Disturbance
__ :...IL = D — .. .., ,.:.
] C C NPDES Silt Fence
, __I =
= C C =Project Area Boundary
] . • IC I PPrroop oosseedd THaaxni a
anres/A/ C prons
__ 1 ] C[
. ®Proposed Riprap PadsHEADWATER FOREST WETLAND
ADJACENT TO RPW C f/�1 Clearing Impacts
0.007 ACRES FILL(RIPRAP) E ] C
_ 1 CJinnull�unu1N ®Riprap Pad
0.04 ACRES CLEARING C ] — ] C ] Cuuuu,2ut,lnn�
�j1 Delineated Wetland
mnnm unnni ®DNE_Thick
— C _ ] C ] ;: uuu uw
C D _ ] C ]
1:5-
-----------_____, -.., — -- x i—k _L:j —
Proposed Clearing r _ _i
�
Dr-
1T1T1T1T1
Proposed Riprap Pad r,1�.......
- / 1T1T1T1T1T1T1T1T1T1 T T T T T.T.T.T T T T T
J 1 1 1 1 1
10)
C ITTTTTTTTTT RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
�► ev wSOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
� LEE COUNTY,N.C.
• !Q� DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021
NPDES-Silt Fence ` ,��•�.� MONCURE 7.5'USGS TOPO
��• �4���*��.` • . SHEET 2 OF 3
Limits of Disturbance �� �� 0 150 300
•• Feet

CROSS-SECTION VIEW
TRENCH FORMER DETAIL TOGGLE LOCK AUXILLARY RAIL - SLOPE
0•7 NTS
TRANSITION TO OUTL.T RIPRAP TRENCH!
B - 12"OF CLASS
••• SEE STRUCTURE TABLE
••• .' 7>�Ti='�r-r FLOW
7.
2-15"CMP CULVER , :••/I /- �r1✓� �✓���_:��i��i
%I ��IjI� t ��ib
Mr "Vited.WW41441.1"
zs.„ � TRENCH RIRRAP
A :: � � �1�s1ll A HORIZONTA
'•�� !�� GEOTEXTIL
••••;• TRANSITION TO MATCH
•
SECTION A-A
B -
PLAN VIEW
RIP RAP BASIN NUMBER
TABLE FOR DETA EXISTING WESIPOND 2 OUTLET BER
NATU RA
A 1.5 1.68
.�00000.�oo'� ♦ ' oo./0000.�V
�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�io� «- - --«� ♦r�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i
GEOTEXTILE
SECTION B-B
NOTES:
ROCK ENERGY DISSIPATOR BASIN DETAIL
••7 NTS
RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
SOUTH TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
LEE COUNTY N.C.
DATE:JANUARY 11, 2021
MONCURE 7.5'USGS TOPO
SHEET 3 OF 3

Appendix B
RALEIGH EXEC
JETPORT
Site Photographs
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

Site Photographs—Raleigh Executive Jetport
•
^-_ -__ ,,,
Kt- ',,,, +Si'_-fib L hk, �„s ': '._
L 4
C 7
e
g� : :$ 7 ' t '� w` F 'r? M a ron R k' x' �/.,p xw,.. ' 1 i.
yr rr x rd�' ,: �'Ef .� S i t�
Photograph 1: Looking East at Future Hangar Area

� �_ _
��, _I
esy
1
_ t
•
.`S
- .
Photograph 2: Looking North at Area of Future Taxilane

•
-,, rR
• ..._ �i c:5 7i' '^ 1 �::"-;,n;4 �' ' 4 a.• I7 �r�- ;x��--
—, - - g- - lcr t 4 :r. .�E-,r e ,�"ca='i �' F- ^`'•x'^ ''' ,wi < 'bc'',-'''�'. r�'
•
_�.- ,.`:,.re.,f-_�.,` ."4-. ,-�.,d»•-rar..Y+1t'pr- .x.i v c<..�..�w:�Wi'�.. _.:"....j.'` t#�.,F nF' ., :.' a---a�-r 1k 5`4;,+��'"C� f-tu,. rg.�.' ,7t.��@ a F�'✓:.!...--i:ri�ai.��y Fb'.Xf.C y n d'� "s1,f....,-.•,F.
tiP-•b`..,
�'xI,Y.�n hi dv d 4 -fi tr s;'d•�t
6'r,
': . - l.1, ,� o .'2 .",i n :a F v� a . " o ,Y' 7 i;.r ,+i�, J �i i ,
.4I f
�c'm : , F `w i ,� L : Y �f�R '` ' wf C� �p� �' � �•y:' !rcJfr"nn. o'4 r .ai,
., .7 y v .' y .:3 'E � . : {a :Fei -r� ' r r. ' IN at�� 4K '"�' 7 ;x:-5 , 7 t ' � r• , " � ',,, ��f rJ1' � . .:.;r�A� 11u t .E� -sr'h ,,ia :.3sY i ._.,,,� -s 4 b ;rR� , � 1 � . .3,e }�4,,fir ` � •;i0 } � C�` 4. ,
..
,..
.R.
'*-n0 _ F lr V [� Fw. ,�'.^ , �;r "; T/ V *�t:(.�'. � ' , .. 1.;r i 11Y 'P„ �?Y , ` _ ,- , ' - y� ;:. 4 ; , y" a X4n. � n " �Y3n Z ,!�;,; Y ,„1, :,�t'v:., tFf} µ� ak 4A 1 :t J ,
•
e•
."`� ; 4,� r k,'14:a � : A5":1 r }1 "hy o 1 • Y•p"'• 1,F* is�d . P . .yi t ,*k . t 4* 1 ",�£q + .7 � 1.'.�1 ,f � , ,4 ro, ,er• 'ry �'=.m:an m e;r� .r ��i •,,, �, ,,,, . 2 '¢, .'Y4',"tf .y '„ '' `' ya � �K /•-- T� �. ry „s f .. �� S .am , . e,') !xr i- �T rI & "aU . . - �� N, `y 4;. 4A fi.4' . . ,:r..r , >! • t s�- r ' L '.' x ng ' � h * r1 U < + ." :4., ; .-.:: tC>i; ,.} 8,7, Ir Y- , .K. � �3•.� `�; iq x , . >"� ..""r 7 4,4 ; < 7 b r ": r ..,,,, a,!U " , �:, :`:' "'Y . 9 t - _Fra ,� +z y 3 ', ,r ,,> ` ik , ' .,v. k , a �� -.- ;.„ . .titcF 7 , ,5' Ky „'! a +r > *-" • i�71.,- � r�Ph -sr s•y s'. :, vb _ -§U. qv.' +F '. „'h Ul•Kl'& a � �t ,h.. J+.sOt t3414 *r ' ! t`;ac - , H7'✓ f4:.,I,f A r.. 'r � 4 � , 'r% Mi� as :ri7 " n a a , � ,-, J si �vY' Y 4 G",;+°.,.-`_r c -. �*'-.� � r_" rl7! „t .'1` : k • ' , e }^ aS 3:.• Ui . ',au ; _ v�: r ` " :.1s� :7 n TY,1-'f. =� �,, ,9` x MCh. -; ua h1 - or.,dF. ., ,:G 1G ,, "p e F ay ,p ¢ v . r - yf y -� � u .:,^ - .f €iox -y, i78 p A y,sam� 'tiy Y la• i 4� .: � tm9,,o f -s r i . r . r .-,. yPi' ay ' l , Vi; < o .�,". ,a, ,0"rs d,?'* .' - + :,� , ,K;, F ", .r � : r •!� J�.wa1� r �, �e' W' Ri id+ r-/ ss 5ga 1 ' .� b. �� v + {. , y u: � � + _ .' �,ffiE 'z� ndi a:a , 9 $ F : . . f U , - E,ci' -, n r' r _ iA. ,rQ 'f '' x . ; n •a f. � ,� � +'a £ri� f s ti a " t •
'F ' ›• $ o l � �:y r r{ ! t `!n R 9rw h -% , � � r i x4r "if"..:. 45s "p�r t � 0.���kF �p r a .FS".
..
,,.,,,,,_
• •tr7S.'..,... ..;,f--?1-'-.:,: ".....-,-.7---::::,!...]', .'ill....-•;,..-.-'''..-.;i
.4
Photograph 3: Looking South at Area of Future Taxilane

x
•
•
�� • a• �.+
.44104,
s'•17‘1`,44;-;;A:-:„..,;',.ni,til-V ,•_ ,/'..-,-.,.. ',r'.'1,,„,1'7,•itf.;4::",-.„/'*-'714;'' ' ' 'It,"•,'Y'-.- "I'"'''''' '-`-'., ',...' ,- - •-w- .. . '.4`-t,:4•4111#1;i44 - .• -"''''' ..1:""64Alr--
44 c.. "A� ... u a ,-;-" ,,-. "'c ry - t. i`=.. _ µ,., F '�4 a
�i'' W *r rx � vr* �
1' r x 4 l4e.'� yt•v �,..a�.qy: 4 tw>. y t - d y
ti b *P.M r a gb �H.w
Nsr.�✓�' a�y�q r ��:� �._" _,., -,...-4.,,,,,'---.-..--- .Yti �� �M ... am-'.•_
e '�.9d'Sf+�u �' +P c'.r'
6- �h orr, .. 4 e t
4,4
•
•
t - x \VQ
Photograph 4: Looking West at Area of Future Taxilane

Appendix C
RALEIGH EXEC
JETPORT
Wetland Mapping
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

\ \ /10
\
'ry{d.f ... /'.;` , x}}''=' ,- r-;. ;v- i '. -- / 1 f , / I • I \ I \ /// / /,/I 'f � + •} ! 1 1 fifer, t�
) • 1 /
•
•
•
•
\• • \• •\ \ { ; • \ < 1 , 11,
•
it*/ •/ a / ,_ • /
�i',,.+K Y .\• •'•„ Jt' .-qj/':..:( /:G \ \ . \ \ \ 1 / \ / / / / / / / / ' .i / 1 , !�
\ \ •.:85 s ,• • \ '. "J .F' \. \ \ \ \\( 1 \ / ••/ / / ♦ / , / / }' / I / .y ar
`\ `\ ,�• . ,} . \\ \ , \\\ . , / , , , , , // '
• Le end
•• � r"` J. •
,' _ _ . ! .:
1 • 1
•
`` ' '/ I Evaluation Area
4. C ','aC ''' Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
Alt
•
•
' - -i / ' •, • • .y. • • coP� Potentially Jurisdictional Intermittent Stream
' _ - \ r \`-'' -, /_ 1 � j Potentially Jurisdictional Pond
I
` / �1I %7 j Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
I ;/ ;''Y_ • - \\\\• \`\ •\ \`\ \`\\`\ • j i •
t 1 fir//1 :r t. > I • \ ��i'*. Non-Jurisdictoz :wateI
l BMP
ok
>. ulvert•
-� � 230A TT 230B \ ` `;;= *- - = � \
/ \
+ 1
j/ ♦'-_� I`'\\ `; 11 \\\\ II i % I \ is /' - tit lir - fAli d3._` • 1`\
it
f I 1\ \I I 1 \ \\ \\\ l / / % // T+ , ,rif I y .: M1 ';i - a= _,r.r•` � �l
\\ (\\ 1 1`--/ // \` \`\, \`\ l / / / / !� - /����;�� • f I , j
W3 (+_ �� Confirmed byAndyWilliams of /
:\; `\\ \\-i/ / ■ ac.) „ f •• +**.,A , •/ i,.WII '. \.if. a f• fi r' �. /
ic• 7 /
\\ \\ I _ -��- • the USACE on 01 /29/2020. i '
\ • _ s
\ \ \. • J a._ .. _\ + // l 1 1 \_ \\1F:1 •• I \- D P5 . ,_� w 4.} _ c _ \` + n " 4... .
% •
1 / 1239A & 237BTTS02 '� / / ØL . ,�\11 / " " • /
I \ \ I \ • -__ /I\\\\r'. . {' ; " - '- ,/
N.: • . ' iii, ,
, , . I / • I / •, '.:` / / / • / I ‘, A\\\ .,...)" / .. .•• /
• \ I 1 I % /, `\ \\ • j/ �' / 1 / J I I \ `�• �`♦ `I 1 `, `\ ;�\�_------- Y �''x •
���--I' ( �\
. I/ , . -.
\ / - `\ % ' S 0 2 Start \ \ ` �\ ` \ \\ \ \\- '' ..r • \' \ \` \ ` • ` \\` •
\
\• \`- '''/ ♦--.. /, �'` f ,/ /', I. \\ ;_ \\ -�Ir:'s\ \\ `\•`\ _ /{ \�\\ \\`\ \`\\\`\\`\\\\\\ /r '�''.;a't'-' - -h r _, - • \\ \\ \\ \ `
'.. ./ \ \ / / \ 1 ..., \ • \ \ 1 \ \ iii '•, • \, \‘'• \\ \ . / / /
•
- / I \ I / / ) 1 ?\\_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` `• \ \\ - \\ \\- iplibblibp , / / , ,,
• /
\\`------ ' \I I /% % I ��' / /^ `1 \ `\.. `\, `\ ` \ \ \ \ ` ` \\ \. \ \- : :h_,/ -- // ,/ / /
1 I \ \ i '
\ I I 1 1 \ /'
/ / \ \ \\- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ «':tip I , ,4 I - 1 ( �� ��/ i
._\\ / f;1/ 1. 1 •' l 1 % /' \ ••.---\ \--\- • 1 1 / 1 I \ \ \\ s \ \ `\\ \ ,,�,� , I 1 \ l i
.4.
-\\ \ I I i r 1 `\ \ I • I / .. `\\ -\ 1 .I I 1. 1 •\`\ \`\ \ 9 I` •\\` \` `\ \`` •�,�,� ' 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ i
\ \ , t 1, / I \\ 1 / / • . r-^-�- - \ 1 r \ .' \ \ \ \ 1 I 0 \ \ ! 1 f \ •` \ /
\ / I // // .. / 1 I\ \ 1 I / / I / s \ 1 •1 1 1 1 \ \ \ '\ \ ` \ ,: � , ,•
I •\ \ \ .. 1 \• \
1 1 1 \ sit / /1 / 1 \\\
• 1\ 1I • / 1 • 1 1 \ 11// /% II 1 \ 1 1 1 6\ \ f / ' 1 ; , / ` ` ` \ ` `• . 365 & 366 TT Culvert \• \ `\ \\. `\ I I \_--
\• •\ III�u, r♦ 1 \ \ \ \ I \ :. : \ \ n ; wg ,,,••5, r , •` •\. ` -___ \\\•\ \`\. ` `�': \ \ \ \ I , 1 I
F (± 600 ft.) I -t7; , , ; 111. \\ :\\ ,\ C (_ 2875 ft.) -- \ \\ \\\ \\ r , ; x .---
/////// 1 r 1 ► 1 \ "' \: \ ?�:' \ \ \ ` \` 41 1 1 .\\ \ `t 1 1 I 1 __
`• /1/irr/t '♦'� 1 1 I 1 I 1 ` f _ \ a\ • \ \.\\ \` \` \ I r \ \
` //. ♦ / / 1 1 \ 1 1. \\ t. r' -\ \ •\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ `\\\\ Ot /1 I 1.II. ..• \ \ 1 / / / / 1
•
•
//,,, y., I 1 1 1 \ \\ \.....„....
_- -\ I 1 I __ - \ \ _ 1 1 \ I ; �i Off ; R Streams become impounded\\ \\\ .. \
, I I , , , k, , /
1 // // /-- \ \ \ v'n 1 1 _--_ - \ ' , 4 r 1 I \` • III I \ 1 I 1 1 \ I 1 \ \-- \ 1 j \ \ ♦ 1- 1 1 1 1 I I 1 \ I II '�� I I
®/ __ I I \ \ \ \ \ .• I / f \ \ aWlo '/ I / / 1 1 1 It I I \
%%o/. %// 1 1 1 \ \ \\ \\ - - \\\ \\ \r :1 / / I / % -.\ \ /// I I \ \\ '1. w. Au-K.W. . 1111 Il I, ' ; \ \\ 1 I 1 1 ; I\ -_-- / /
/// / .\ \ - \ \. I I /j/ \ \ • A , Ill \ 1 1
///0/'r� //// I I 1 `\ \`\ `\ --_�- I 1 /1/i I 11 ♦ � I / / / I \ 1 1 ,r \ _ \S01 Start 11 _ \ \ \ __ \ I. - - 1 I / I / / I \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ - \I \ ` \ ` 1 , , 1 \ 11 \ \ \ \ \ \ I\ \ / 1 , / I I I \ ` \ \ \ 1 II Ilf \ \ \ \ 1\ \ , • • / I •\ I , , �� -.. \ \. 430B TT 430A , ` \ . \
/, //41\ 1 1 ` \ 1 / / / I / / /i//i/
/ ' \ \ \\� I. 11 1 / j // / '/ / / \\\ \\`\ \ \ • \ ' \ \ \ \ `\ \\-- \ \ \ I \ \
/ // / / / i/' •/ / / / I 1 I I I 1 _ --%7% I 1 1 l \ --- 1 \ \ \ \\1. \\ \ ` \ \ • .' t\ `\ \\ \\ \` `` • \\ \l •
%/i/ 1 f i i i/ /'' ' / % ! f 1 1 1. _ , I 1 l\ ' `\:,. \\ \ \ \ I I. r / ' \ .1 , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
/// / 1 I / ♦ / ♦ , / / / \ \ \ I I \ •\ \ \\ \ \ , v. \ . \ \\\ \\L \ `\ ` \ 1 1 _ / \ \ \ •, \ \ .`\ •
`\ \ I I I ;
/ I. I 1 1 I 1 \ '\, \ \ \ 1 1 •' 1 \ \ ` , •\ \ , \\\ \\\\\ ` 1• 1 F S
1 1111 \t / \ \ 1 •\ •`\ \ \ \ 1 f I I I
/ /1 I I / / / / / > I / ► \ "\ \ \ 1 ♦ \ 1 ,\\ \ \ 1 1 \ I \ \ \ 1 • I 1
/ , \a I I I / / / / / I I / l 1 \ \ \ \ , •, I \ \ \ I I , .\ \ . \ \ , j 1 •
1111 I.,.
/ / I • I.1 I I l •I ( ( \ I . \__ \. \ \ ! / ) ) \ 1 .111\ `; \` ---_/ \ •
\` `\ \\ \ 1 Il I I I
I I 1 1 \•\ \ \ \ / I / / \ 1 1•.• 1
- I I \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \_,/ I I • /' \ • I I 1 1 \ 1 \\ \ - \ \ I I I
, ,•_ „ " 1 \ \ 1 �- ` \ • \ \ I / / / /''• I / I 1 \ ' •�� I \ \ 1 •\ \ 1 I 1 I ( 1
1 I 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / ( ) I 1 ' I .,1 / l '• 1\1 7 / \ \\ J \ \ \ 1 I , 1 \ 11
'�\ I I I % \ `- \ • \ 1 1 \ \ \ ` • • • / 1 / r / :. - � , i i I. %,, / l'/ /,/ \ \\ \ \ !., r f.l•. $ , \ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1' \
•
1 . 1 1 I 1 ----\ \ \ \ \ \\ " +' • / . / / / --' ♦ / / , ..y/ // / • I \ \ \ , 1' i. •,:. I , :\,,,\
\ 1 / 1 / Iti III1III \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ .' - O / lI I / /'' _-- / / / / /' 1 f I , I . \ \' I ., , I / �__ 1 I 1 \
\ II , II1 \, 11 ` \\\\ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ -\� J-. / 1 / / / - / j / / / /1 I / \ `\ \\ \ .r ,€ I % / lF I \\ I I 1 1 1 1 1
:..\ I I I I. •\ \ ) 1 1 1 I \ \ :\ \\ -\\_ l / I l / _ / , J I / l \ \ \: ` w _yea';: , ...,.\-
�\ / / , I , I
\ 1 1 I ,`-\ \ I /''/'1 , \ \ ` ` `-_ / 1 / i / / ♦ ♦ / / / 1 / 1 1 1 ! t" l s •t 4tc"F J \ \ \ / I / l / I
\ 1 1 \�_-\\\--___-'* 1! // '-\ \ \ \\ `\-_ --- _-♦ ` I l', �1- b� ./ / / / / / l l• / I 1 1 [ 4 .,t :. : R i,"1 (S +' / \___ �.. \\ -/ 1 / / / / / /
\ . l 1 / . \ \ • - --- \ 1 I , , I , , I 1 400 TT BMP • y ak \ �.t• - ;\\ -\ \ 1 , ; / ;
� \� - -^ / / 1 \ \ •\ - -- -- -- I 1 / / 1 1 / I I s' :1 ( .. yP [.\ N. \ \ `-_ / 1 I
• \ \ -N.; 1 1 •r I \ ` `\__ / I 1 I I I {;, 1 i { 11rr ' - \ \ \ / ♦ / / / / /
\ 1 .4 `\ -� / / I ` \\ _-_ / I , . 1 I l ` is It' 4 16 \{'. - \/ / / / / /
1 / , l ( \ \\ \•
;-\•\ \\ ------- - 331 TT BMP \ 1 I , • . , \ , , , , ,, .
1 • -- • \ •\ \ \ I{� r I I I \' \• I 11/
1 f /
•
.. \\ \ 1 ' 1 \ •„,„„ -`\ ` I. 1 \ \ __---\ \`\ \\\\ •\`\_- \ --\ • I \\ ' ' ' %h.=: a: ,\`\-S. ,,1 ,I 7ir}� rat. : •' 1 /• \ \ __-_ /�./ / 1 1 i 1 I \
• i \\ \\ \\ ` \ / r \ '/_ \\ \ •\\ .\\\ --- \ i .: ?r. Te_-_\- \\ \\\s I {{ li Fr ki l"x _-__ , , I I \ 1
/^-\\ \ \ \- -\\ I / / / - '\ ` `\\ _ l ary. -'�: tr 4 „ Sl-1 ?{2 '0: ,1 / I I ( I \ \ \
• �/ \ \ \ \ _` / / / - �� \ \\ \• •
\ \.. \ •`\ 't,.�. + :t'Yas' ,[R: ! ` !y`.;...'.: �5- W7 1 2 8 a c ' / ` \ \ \
j , I l/ j i j j \ `\ \`\ •`--_ `\ \ 1 }. .is• '.._ ;1 • \ . ' 1 • \
. • ill 1 l'•'% '•' 1
•
1 / Y t\\C\ \\1\`\ \\ -/ i ` •
.`\\ `\ \`- \ I• \ t # c; x. 4 r![� :..'r6 •1A .k<i':..r; l i�-. \ / j \\\ \\ \\ -\-_ -i''• l- // \\
1 / \1\ .\ / \_ \ - \ \ 1 ` 4L1. „T rt •.I I• '--t.... 4i.s-- • J -111 ' f ` \ \ ___ -/ I
1 `\ 1\\\\ `\\ \\ `\ /-. _♦ /,-'\\ \\ \--- \4. \ 1 • 1` \ Ix\.,; 1. a3.: . of : •` I ; \- ' l 1 \\ \ \\ I
I \ l\.\ \ \\ \ ` / �\ \------- `\\\ -\\ \\ I 1 1 1..'. •- :#',' S` .' '1 I ;\ \.. {� ',9i • ' - ' 1-
/ A •/• /mot • I ( , ,/..,
\\ `\ \\ \ -----__'/ /'' /'---- ----'/
•
in.
•
•
/ \ 1 \ `\ - / \ ------- - - `. \ \ '�4 y .ham a. +d'. •.dP-,.:, ' M1/°' .C•.:. 1 \ --
___ % t' '�_t lY: ! I 1. / \
•
/ \ 1\ ``\ ` \• \\ %--- \ _-___ \`- --\ ` \\ \\ \\ 11:V :I 1 ,1 Y'_: \ ,. . /tee/. //.j). .:1../: \\ 4 / % \\ \` '-'' / \_ i
_ _ �' •''. , ma c!' .. ✓. • /•' / _ {I' \ ' / \ \-\_ / /' •-\ _-1
•
` ` \ ` ♦ ` \ \ \ .Y\ 19r11'./ i r ` C t\ l c ., �/ `F{ • j I j� / / / / \ \ / \`----'
�t 1 1\V
/ /\ ` \ \\__ ` \\ --� 'wC_ .s.= 1 it ld ¢ 3 : , .l.;� o'aai i/_ / f \ \\ \\ , / / / -� \\
. iildir
•
I % % .). rt ��1 ' ' - - ' 400A TT 400 B \ \ ` \ -
`\ - \ 1 -`\\ \` , . 1' Yt I% '} j- I / O ,i/�/' /i' �r' .... \ \ 1 \ -/'' \ 1 f' -
\1 • \ \-- \ `. a \\. \\ �\_ . -� \_-- \ { ' I' '''I''�� I 1. I/,/ %r / l \\_- _i ♦ .11..P. ` 1 I I J \ \ 1 / ------
•
/ r. /• \ \• • -_- \-\\ \\-\ \ \ \` \ -\ \\\ \ I \I I.J• . ,s, I / I. y ' i i!i \ • \ \ 1 \\ - / '• \ / / / l I. / / ' ' I I %
•
1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ / , 1.' 6' I \ \ / S 0 3 Start / 1 \ / / I
\� \\ \. \\ \ \ •\\ \\- •\ \ / f I l f, 11 1 / /1'1 1 \\ 1 '\`:\\ �_- / i \. _/' / •. \ ••
1 \ `\ `\-i' ./! ♦ / I
1.
\ W5 (+ 0. 17 ac ) \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ - \ \/ I 1 I 11 I( //�' , \ \ ` \ \ / i 1 I 1 \• /7 , / / \ \ \ \ \ -i i / I
a__. _ ■ ■ \ \ \ \ \ •\\ `\ `\ f 1/1 1 I 1/ /l I I \ \ \•\ \ •\\. // -_ 1 1 I \-, / / % `\ \ \\ \ `------ / / _i y
--: 14* \ . . - \\ `\• \``\`\ ``\ `•
`• \ \\ \\ i 1I.1/ (I 1 I \\ ' \ `\ `\-\, �.,,_--• //�-/ 1 �' 1 I 1 _i % ' ` \\ •` \\ i - I
• 4,11
\\ \\ `\ Impounded channel !; \ ...• / \ 1 i''''""''''., ''\. \ w
\•\ \ \ _ I ` \ - - ........ - :.,:
• \\/
\ / I \ N. , \ s\ \ / /// /// \ _ -
1- , _ "\ \ `\ , , ,., ; , I % _ •\ . ;\\ -- ' 240 TT P L 11 'I. r \ \ ` \ - ' ' - ' = \
•
. 1 L\3,-
. s . , ,
, 1 1 ,
. : •. ``, `\ W4 (± 5■ 1 7 ac■) ; 1::::;::::
; �,`,;, ; , I I ; I ;`\ ``\ -; • ; --
Stream weakens along field edge O y ` :\'.... \\\ ��` ;-
• 1..s/ , / / 1 \ \\\•-\\*.,‘.\\'.\\\\'''''•\..... .0.'"':''' // //
\�=-'' E ( 1925 ft.) DP3 - -- - \``\ \`\,``-`_; '% \ ' - '
lir
‘ .
•
- I '- • • O• HO O • 1 I / ./I I 1 •\ ` )\ • \ ' ('. -`\4.
\ -_. \ •
\ `\ / ) 1-\` //
x J rt . "``�'F'm""aY wd i J / I I I 1 .{ . :.1 \ \ \ \_/ 1 \ ' ' /
• / \
i.
• - -- '- \ l • �j - y- - 1 /..' • /I /\ - - r_ \\ _J i \ l !t /• ---i
\ , c:/. x� �s-v--, I I \ / \ • I\ /
•
i . . . B (Hughes Creek) (± 1250 ft.) • =-\ ,\�_-- . .. :_ 1 '
/.. / I,L,/-\\`��•\\\.'`' �" _ ' /' /i/r2=_- -_--_-: \ \\\\\ .•,. /. // / I , / --_- \-=`______-- \`•�\\\ F. \ I 1 -\
\ - 1:1 1 \\\\\\\\ �, s': --'L _x.- mow}_ % '/%/%l% -��\`` \\\ • \ \ \ .j .- --_- \ \\Y \ ,.. \_. / ,\\. +' ,
•i\ \ / •
III
., \ `\\l. .'' ,\ - ,�„_ _ _ - x-___� s-• . .. / / MI //, /•":---‘ 4''1/ /,I1 1 1-' y1 • \ . l /,/ /i'./' /' --------.•
_ -\\ •\ \ \ \\\\ \\ I 1 \ '- . 4' •i\ \,,- /
/ - , \ \ \\\ \-_ _--- ------- _- ----_^� ---....,/ 'r' �%I/�l j I /�% %//Ir %;:;i.1 I. \\ l I'�f`•�� /r/ -/� --\\ \\ \\• \\\`\ \\\\\ `\\\ I 1 --- - ----------`�__ 1 / -' ^ J ''
--- •
- - 4 : ,/•I. -.i ,i / /�//r 1 /. r./11 I I I /. r` ! -_i \ \ I? . I / I / 1 1 \ • / i, `- /' -_ _---- �` / y0--
r.% //,
/ / K<<'": ♦ C/ //)/ /'/ /' 1 1 / / l l I l I 1 \• I I \ / / \ \• 1 , //i---- `\_ • s
Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US '//• , /P/ �;�1.:.•t ._ ' /I •///I / / / ,,_ I• , / / , , ; l / , • \\ I ;__-/ `__-' / \',•\ ,,�;rl. --\
// /I' • ,. / 1 /// 1 / / / • \ ' / / / 1 / \ - \ / /� \\ rr / // I ,-�_-_- \'
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only - A ♦ t: - �. i ,I I// / ♦ 1 1 \ -- - \ • / ` /, / \ •
/ l I:. /'7' III/ / ' ♦ /' \ I / / / / / l -.- •\ 1 -y/ \ / / / _ -\ ...III/' / // �.
S86EC reserves the right to modifythis mapbased on more fieldwork, r'' / /// ♦' -\ \ ` ` \ \ \ t . \ t O- . -- '1 •\ •\ _.' • I• / /" /// \
\ and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped using •
{ \r\ • 5 y- .,' �� i /� ,- --\ \ \\ \\\\1‘ �\ \,\ \ \ _/ I• -\\\\\ \ __-- •
I ! . -_ ; I I I 7/1 II 1 rt ' /'',......- _\ , -•\`\�;
•
topographic maps, air photos and ground truthing. If the site is going -\.a ,._ / /, , .../-„,/"...--'
/' ____ \\ \ \\ \\\\ \ • \ \, \ 1 . i • ;\\`\_, \\' • ,/';^ -`\� • i \\ -- �, i \ i i i i i i 'i' \` `� \\ \
to be disturbed, S&EC's detailed delineation should be approved and r • '*:~\\ / / I / / / / / / . ''- \
` \ \ \ \ ` - • ` •' J : /h
hh .e. '�4 . / l 1 I / / / / .:/'' \ \ \ I \ \ \ 1 1 \ 1 1 / .\\ \. -\ \O \\ \\ \ , / �I III// / ,_--\ \ 1 \\
# / / 1 1 I / / / \ 1 . 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I / 1 , / �\ \ \\ I , \ \__ -. \ , , I II II , 1 / `\ •`\ I 1 I
permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of 1 "+.::• / .. 1 I / 1 1 1 I 1 1 Ili / / / ` - / / 1 u 11
I a d / I I I I I , 1 I I •I I l l 1 I / I / I\__ ( \\ \ `\_ I / `\ _\� /' / ( / / // I I 11 ; I I 1 1
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by ( ; ; / ; ; ; 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 I / I / . \ \ `\ `\- \\ / \\ I / 7/ I 1 •; i ;I ; 1\
�,I F., l I \ If I \
S&EC, the should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to 1 1 1 1 I' I , 1 1 1 I 1 1 IIII f 1 1 / , `\_ `\ •\ `-_' \ / . . \ / I 1 \ \
Y g Y I • 1 I ; • ' \ \I I I 1 1 ( I I \_�``\ \ - •,..__-----
--`\ \I 1 I I I , : \\ I \\\\
locate S&EC's flagging. 1 r i , i . \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 I / / _ •/ Ill \ /' \ I / 1' 1 \ \ \ \
► , / 1 1, I / • / \ ! III I I \ 1 / \ \ / \ _. \\I / 1 \\1 1 1 I \ \ \ .\\
/ 4 . j// ; I I'.`I / / \ •• 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I \ \\, \ % / ,' -/ I \\ \ • `\__� --- - _ -/.=^\ \II I\ I VA, \ 1 I .^\ \ \\ . \\ \
1 I It /. ,-,/.J I I. I / I \ • \•1 1 1 I 1 1 \ a. •/• / / ' . \ \ \ •\ \ \11 \\ 1 NA\ . I \ \ \ \
►, ! / / / / , , ,- I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 \ % / / /.--__ \ \ \.„ `\ i^^--- _ �. : \ \\ `. . 1 11\ \ / / \ \ \
/ L. / / i i /i / /- • r 1 I l l / / 1 •r 1 1 1 \ / / / � \ \\ `\- _-'' ---^----r _____________ \ \\`,..`\ • I 111\I', \ i / / `�\`\`\
/ , �/ /ii.'/ / i •1 % ,///// / // / / / 1 I I 1' ---i l I ' \\ \\ \ - A. 1• \\' \ \ 1 1, \\ \ \
u •......-• / .- .,,' -✓ /' /// / I .1 [ / \- . \ •
\ 1 ! I C "t ,.. 9raphl••/ u u tAnaly`1
Raleigh Jetport - South 0 200 400 800
Wetland Sketch Map Project No. Scale: Lee County, NC S& Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
14034.W1 1 = 200'
Post Ii S A C E site Visit 412 .,11s of Neuse Road,Suite 104,Raleigh,NC 27615•Phone:[phone]*Fax:[phone]
Project Mgr.: 11/08/2019 Prepared by: saodec:aat7t Feet
SB JH

./-__f
m §2S 4 ,f9‘e,"' .
s . _ N Lam,
I //
L 3 ///
v i e
r _Pr'4 l
, / i i / Fr--''1
l �I If x
oa
A. _
�� * --1
33 /
\\'� C i
) ,,,'/,,,
6 V'
y
1.4:g ,r//'
Ad
J �1,I�
\ / lz .-v 4.4:1a.
-- � '' ' 1
i
1(
1 !.....1:7,/,,,,:, /,,1::'''' '::'.
P; / ,,,
o A(/
i ' 111
i
/)
,
A /
/; / / f 1
i
i •
/ 2 „ ,
e ,,,i '/
1
/
i /
7
h
11
e> , 11
A
i & 1 III / I
11
i r
I I , ,/ '
5
• ' {III I 7 / 7 /
f
x•II ,
` I / _ a
D 2Pf ' ' gs.,,,b,,e i
D �U,pmp r R 1
L'51 ''n $c� - -.f t:.':,
�� y ppa C
i s _
_Jo

Appendix D
RALEIGH EXEC
JETPORT
NCDMS Approval
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

.0,STATE OF %,,
011,'
= n D S
Mut Is,n
Egt QUAWJ'°
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN February 1, 2021
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Bob Heuts
Raleigh Executive Jetport
700 Rod Sullivan Road
Sanford, NC 27330 Expiration of Acceptance: 8/1/2021
Project: South Terminal Development County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s)an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC)
Cape Fear 03030004 Riparian Wetland 0.047
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Ed Smail, agent
NORTH CAROLINA Q
Department of Environmental Nall\ie.*/
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Appendix E
RALEIGH EXEC
JETPORT
Agency Coordination
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

STATh
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
ROY COOPER MACHELLE SANDERS
} GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 3, 2019
Mr. Edward Smail
Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
do Michael Baker International
4401 Belle Oaks Drive
North Charleston, South Carolina 29405
Re: SCH File # 20-E-0000-0093; Proposed project is for the development of an area to
the south of the existing terminal area including site preparation for box hangars,
improvement of the current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar
taxilanes to a new end-around taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
Dear Mr. Smail:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been submitted to the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. According to
G.S. 113A-10, when a state agency is required to prepare an environmental document under the
provisions of federal law, the environmental document meets the provisions of the State
Environmental Policy Act. Attached to this letter for your consideration are comments made by
the agencies in the review of this document.
If any further environmental review documents are prepared for this project, they should be
forwarded to this office for intergovernmental review.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Cryst Best
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region J
Mailing Address: Telephone:[phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Fax:[phone] 116 WEST JONES STREET
1301 MAIL SERVICE CENTER COURIER#51-01-00 RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH,NC 27699-1301 Email:[e-mail]
Website:www.ncadmin.nc.Rov

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROUNA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.RAGAN
Seerenny
JAMIE RAGAN
Pireaor
MEMORANDUM
To: Crystal Best
State Clearinghouse Coordinator
Department of Administration
From: Lyn Hardison
Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
Environmental Assistance and Project Review Coordinator
Washington Regional Office
RE: 20-0093
Scoping-Proposed project is for the development of an area
to the south of the existing terminal area including site
preparation for box hangars, improvements of the current
taxi-lanes, and the connection of the existing hangars taxi-
lanes to a new end-around-taxi-lane at the Raleigh Executive
Jetport.
Lee County
Date: December 2, 2019
The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the proposal for the referenced project. Based
on the information provided, several of our agencies have identified permits that may be required and
offered some valuable guidance. The comments are attached for the applicant's review. The
comments are attached for the applicant's review.
The Department agencies will continue to be available to assist the applicant through any
environmental review or permitting processes.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachments
414
North Cirolinzi Department of Environmcnta1 Quality Division of Environtnental Assistance and Costumer Service
217 West Jones Street 11639 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Cal Om 27699-1639
877.623.6748

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director- Environmental Quality
November 18,2019
MEMORANDUM
To: State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
From: April Norton, Division of Water Resources,Transportation Permitting Branch
Subject: Comments for the proposed improvements to the Raleigh Executive Jetport,consisting of the development
of an area to the south of the existing terminal area; located in Lee County, approximately seven miles
northeast of the Town of Sanford.
The Division of Water Resources received a request for comments dated October 28,2019 for the subject project.
Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for impacts to streams in the project area. More specifically,
potential impacts to:
Table 1. Potential stream impacts within the vicinity of the project study area:
Stream Name River Basin/ Stream Classifications Stream Index Number
Sub-Basin
Copper Mine Creek Cape Fear/CPF07 WS-IV 18-4-7-1
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of additional streams and/or
jurisdictional wetlands in the area. If any jurisdictional areas are identified,the Division of Water Resources
requests that the following environmental issues for the proposed project are considered:
General Project Comments:
1. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required by 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental
documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
2. Environmental impact statement alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to streams
and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs that allow for treatment of
the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Department of Transportation Stornnvater Best Management Practices Tool box manual, such as
grassed swales,buffer areas,preformed scour holes,retention basins,etc.
3. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification,
the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of
impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In accordance with the Environmental
Management Commission's Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0506[hj),mitigation will be required for impacts of greater
than 1 acre to wetlands. If mitigation is required,the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate
�"� North Car'ohno Department of Envlr o mental Quality Divisfon of Water Resources
•i�' 512 Neil h S3€ishury Street i617 Moil Sc r vice Center _Raleigh,Nori h Corofna 7.7699 1611
ur i ;;hi'e"1 i; .a.cam n� "'" 919 707,9000

lost functions and values. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services may be available for assistance with
wetland mitigation.
4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0506[hl),mitigation
will be required for impacts of greater than 300 linear feet to any perennial stream. If mitigation is required,
the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services may be available for assistance with stream mitigation.
5. Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, shall continue to include an
itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding mapping.
6. The NCDWR is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. The
NCDOT shall address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic
environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
7. An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project is required. The type
and detail of analysis shall conform to the NC Division of Water Resource Policy on the assessment of
secondary and cumulative impacts dated April 10,2004.
8. The NCDOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill, excavation
and clearing,and rip rap to jurisdictional wetlands,streams,and riparian buffers need to be included in the final
impact calculations. These impacts,in addition to any construction impacts,temporary or otherwise,also need
to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification Application.
9. Where streams must be crossed,the NCDWR prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However,we realize
that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that culverts should be
countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover,in areas where high
quality wetlands or streams are impacted,a bridge may prove preferable. When applicable,the NCDOT should
not install the bridge bents in the creek,to the maximum extent practicable.
10. Whenever possible,the NCDWR prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work
within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges shall allow for human and wildlife passage beneath the structure.
Fish passage and navigation by canoeists and boaters shall not be blocked. Bridge supports(bents)should not
be placed in the stream when possible.
1. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across the bridge
and pre-treated through site-appropriate means(grassed swales,pre-formed scour holes,vegetated buffers,etc.)
before entering the stream. To meet the requirements of NCDOT's NPDES permit NCS0000250,please refer
to the most recent version of the North Carolina Department of Transportation Stormwater Best Management
Practices Toolbox manual for approved measures.
12. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or streams.
13. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could precipitate
compensatory mitigation.
14. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for
stormwater management. More specifically,stormwater shall not be permitted to discharge directly into streams
or surface waters.
15. Based on the information presented in the document,the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and streams may
require an application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification. Please be
advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that
water quality standards are met,and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require
the submittal of a formal application by the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWR. Please be

aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream
impacts to the maximum extent practical,the development of an acceptable stormwater management plan,and
the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate.
16. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between
curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged
to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills.
17. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed,the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and
elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and appropriate native woody species
shall be planted. When using temporary structures,the area shall be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area
with chain saws,mowers,bush-hogs,or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact
allows the area to re-vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
18. Unless otherwise authorized,placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams shall be placed
below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches,to allow low flow passage of
water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion
control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or
streambeds or banks,adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above structures.The applicant is required
to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being maintained if requested in writing by the NCDWR. If this
condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting features encountered during construction,please
contact the NCDWR for guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification
will be required.
19. If multiple pipes or barrels are required,they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as closely
as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation,floodplain benches,and/or sills may be required
where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet or
outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased
maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
20. If foundation test borings are necessary;it shall be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is approved under
General 401 Certification Number 3883/Nationwide Permit No.6 for Survey Activities.
21. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient enough to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
22. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures from
the most current version of the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags,
rock berms,cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
23. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of Wetland
Significance(NC-CREWS)maps and soil survey maps are useful tools,their inherent inaccuracies require that
qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit approval.
24. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels to minimize sedimentation
and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This equipment shall be inspected daily
and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels,lubricants,hydraulic fluids, or
other toxic materials.
25. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes
aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed,sized and installed.
26. Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Riparian
vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing season
following completion of construction.

Thank you for requesting our input. The issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate
measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met,and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If
you have any questions or require additional information,please contact April Norton at april.nortonncdenr.gov.

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor- Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
MICHAEi.SCOTT
Director MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Scott, Division Director through Sharon Brinkley
FROM: Drew Hammonds, Eastern District Supervisor- Solid Waste Section
DATE: November 15, 2019
SUBJECT: Review: SW 20-0093 - Lee County(Scoping—Sanford-Lee County Regional
Airport Authority - Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal are including site preparation for box hangers, improvement of the current taxi-lane and
the connection of the existing hanger tax-lanes to new end-around-taxi-lane ant the Raleigh
Executive Jetport)
The Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section)has reviewed the scoping
document submitted for the subject project in Lee County, NC. Based on the information
provided in these documents, the Section at this time does not see an adverse impact on the
surrounding communities and likewise knows of no situations in the communities, which would
affect this project.
As always, for any planned or proposed projects, it is recommended that during any land
clearing, demolition and construction, the Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority
and/or its contractors would make every feasible effort to minimize the generation of waste, to
recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in
the development of this project where suitable. Any waste generated by and of the projects
that cannot be beneficially reused or recycled must be disposed of at a solid waste
management facility permitted by the Division. The Section strongly recommends that the
Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority require all contractors to provide proof of
proper disposal for all generated waste to permitted facilities.
Permitted solid waste management facilities are listed on the Division of Waste Management,
Solid Waste Section portal site at: https:!/dcq.oc.cov/about)divisionstwaste-managcmcntAvaste-
management-rules-data!solid-waste-management-amrual-reports/spalid-waste-permfitted-laciIity-
list
Questions regarding solid waste management for this project should be directed to Mr. Drew
Hammonds, Eastern District Supervisor, Solid Waste Section, at(910)433-3349.
3 5. I 1
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Waste Management
Fayetteville Regional Office 225 Green Stied,Suite i 14 Fayetteville.Nerit Carolina 28301
910 433.3300

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: RRO/FRO
Project Number: 20-0093 Due Date:11/27/2019
County: Lee
After review of this project it has been determined that the DEQ permit(s)and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this
project to comply with North Carolina Law.Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the
reverse of the form.All applications,information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Time
(statutory time
limit)
Permit to construct&operate wastewater
treatment facilities,non-standard sewer system Application 90 days before begins construction or award of 30 days
❑ extensions&sewer systems that do not construction contracts.On-site inspection may be required.Post- (90 days)
discharge into state surface waters, application technical conference usual.
Permit to construct&operate,sewer
extensions involving gravity sewers,pump Fast-Track Permitting program consists of the submittal of an
30 days
❑ stations and force mains discharging into a application and an engineer's certification that the project meets all (N/A)
sewer collection applicable State rules and Division Minimum Design Criteria.
system
NPDES-permit to discharge into surface water Application 180 days before begins activity.On-site inspection.Pre-
p and/or permit to operate and construct application conference usual.Additionally,obtain permit to construct 90-120 days
wastewater facilities discharging into state wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES.Reply time,30 days (N/A)
surface waters. after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later.
30 days
❑ Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary. (N/A)
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the
installation of a groundwater monitoring well located on property not 7 days
❑ Well Construction Permit owned by the applicant,and for a large capacity 000,000 gallons per {15 days)
day)water supply well.
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property
owner.On-site inspection.Pre-application conference usual.Filling may SS days
❑ Dredge and Fill Permit require Easement to Fill from N.C.Department of Administration and (90 days)
Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct&operate Air Pollution Application must be submitted and permit received prior to
construction and operation of the source. if a permit is required
❑ Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources as in an area without local zoning,then there are additional 90 days
per 15 A NCAC(20.O100 thru 2Q.0300) requirements and timelines(20.0113}.
Any open burning associated with subject
Elproposal must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC N/A 60 days
2D.1900 {90 days)
Demolition or renovations of structures Please Note-The Health Hazards Control Unit(HHCU)of the N.C.
containing asbestos material must be in Department of Health and Human Services, must be notified of plans to
® compliance with 15 A NCAC 20.1110(a)(1) demolish a building,including residences for commercial or industrial 60 days
which requires notification and removal prior to expansion,even if no asbestos is present in the building. (90 days)
demolition.Contact Asbestos Control Group
919-707-5950
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity.An erosion&
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres are to be disturbed.Plan must be filed with and approved
❑ by applicable Regional Office(Land Quality Section)at least 30 days before beginning activity. A NPDES Construction 20 days
Stormwater permit(NCG010000)is also usually issued should design features meet minimum requirements. A fee of$65 (30 days)
for the first acre or any part of an acre. An express review option is available with additional fees.
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOT's approved program. Particular
❑ attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable (30 days)
Stormwater conveyances and outlets.
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with Local Government's approved program.
❑ Particular attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well
Based on Local
as stable Stormwater conveyances and outlets. Program
❑ Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0126-NPDES Stormwater Program which regulates three types of activities:Industrial, 30-60 days
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System&Construction activities that disturb zl acre. (90 days)
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000-State Stormwater Permitting Programs regulate site development and post- 45 days
❑ construction stormwater runoff control. Areas subject to these permit programs include all 20 coastal counties,and (90 days)
various other counties and watersheds throughout the state.
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 1 of 3
January 2017/ibh

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: RRO/FRO
Project Number: 20-0093 Due Date:11/27/2019
County: Lee
Normal Process
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Time
(statutory time
limit)
On-site inspection usual.Surety bond filed with DEQ Bond amount
ID Mining Permit
varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land.Affected 30 days
area greater than one acre must be permitted.The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued.
If permit required,application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N.C.qualified engineer to:prepare plans,inspect
construction,and certify construction is according to DEQ approved
❑ Dam Safety Permit plans.May also require a permit under mosquito control program.And 30 days
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers.An inspection of site is necessary (60 days)
to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of$200.00 must
accompany the application.An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion.
❑ Oil Refining Facilities N/A 90-120 days
(N/A)
File surety bond of$5,000 with DEQ running to State of NC conditional 10 days
❑ Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well that any well opened by drill operator shall,upon abandonment,be N/A
plugged according to DEQ rules and regulations.
❑ Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with DEQ at least 10 days prior to issue of permit. 10 days
Application by letter.No standard application form. N/A
Application fee based on structure size is charged.Must include
❑ State Lakes Construction Permit descriptions&drawings of structure&proof of ownership of riparian 15-20 days
property N/A
Compliance with the T15A 02H.0500 Certifications are required
® 401 Water Quality Certification whenever construction or operation of facilities will result in a 60 days
discharge into navigable water as described in 33 CFR part 323. (130 days)
Compliance with Catawba,Goose Creek,Jordan Lake,Randleman,Tar Pamlico or Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules is required.
® Buffer requirements:httpa/de_q.nc.gov/about/divisions/vaer_resources/waterrresources-permits/wastewater_
hranch/401-wetlands-buffer-permits/401-riparian-buffer-protection-program
Nutrient Offset:Loading requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River basins,and in the
Jordan and Falls Lake watersheds,as part of the nutrient-management strategies in these areas. DWR nutrient offset
❑ information:
http://cleq.nc.aav/about divisions/water-resources/planningfnonpoint-source-management nutrient-offset-information
❑ CAMA Permit for MAJOR development $250.00-$475.00 fee must accompany application 75 days
(150 days}
❑ CAMA Permit for MINOR development $100.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
® Abandonment of any wells,if required must be in accordance with Title 15A.Subchapter 2C.0100.
• Notification of the proper regional office is requested if"orphan"underground storage tanks(USTS}are discovered during
any excavation operation.
Plans and specifications for the construction,expansion,or alteration of a public water system must be approved by the
Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction
® as per 15A NCAC 18C.0300 et.seq.,Plans and specifications should be submitted to 1634 Mail Service Center,Raleigh, 30 days
North Carolina 27699-1634. All public water supply systems must comply with state and federal drinking water monitoring
requirements.For more information,contact the Public Water Supply Section,[phone].
If existing water lines will be relocated during the construction,plans for the water line relocation must be submitted to
® the Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699- 30 days
1634.For more information,contact the Public Water Supply Section,(919}707-9100.
Plans and specifications for the construction,expansion,or alteration of the water system must be approved
❑ through the delegated plan approval authority. Please contact them at for further information.
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 2 of 3
January 2017/Ibh

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: RRO/FRO
Project Number: 20-0093 Due Date:11/27/2019
County: Lee
Other Comments(attach additional pages as necessary,being certain to comment authority)
Division Initials No Comments Date
comment Review
DAQ MRF ❑ See checked boxes above. 11/25/19
DWR-WQROS JB& ❑ See checked boxes above.& 11/21/19
(Aquifer&Surface) / /
DWR-PWS SG ❑ See checked boxes above. 11/6/19
DEMLR(LQ&SW) ❑ / /
DWM—UST KEC ❑ The UST Section,Fayetteville Regional Office,does not have record of an 11/6/19
identified release of petroleum in the area of concern for this docket
number,nor are there any records of registered USTs
Other Comments ❑ / /
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
❑ Asheville Regional Office ® Fayetteville Regional Office ❑ Mooresville Regional Office
2090 U.S.70 Highway 225 Green Street,Suite 714, 610 East Center Avenue,Suite 301,
Swannanoa,NC 28778-8211 Fayetteville,NC 28301-5043 Mooresville,NC 28115
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
® Raleigh Regional Office ❑ Washington Regional Office El Wilmington Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, 943 Washington Square Mall, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.,
Raleigh,NC 27609 Washington,NC 27889 Wilmington,NC 28405
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
El Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300,
Winston-Salem,NC 27105
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 3 of 3
January 2017/Ibh

w
d '.
ROY COOPER NOR 1 R CAROL.NA
6f.v,m4. &Alar'mmer/totQu Wy
MICI MAEL S.RtGAN
son...wry
h1EICHAEL SCOTT
CJII t%to,
Date: November 26, 2019
To: Michael Scott, Director
Division of Waste Management
Through: Janet Macdonald
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch —Special Projects Unit
From: Bonnie S. Ware
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Subject: NEPA Project #20-0093, Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority, Lee County, North
Carolina
The Superfund Section has reviewed the proximity of sites under its jurisdiction to the Sanford-Lee County
Regional Airport Authority project. Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the
existing terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the current taxi-lane, and
the connection of the existing hangar taxi-lanes to a new end-around — taxi-lane at the Raleigh Executive
Jetport.
No sites were identified within one mile of the project as shown on the attached report.
Please contact Janet Macdonald at 919.707.8349 if you have any questions.
Nc,1h(.,,,,,,I.4,0,oat tnentodl'ri49rrtrmmNai.iQiiality I [7i=,i,heap€Waste%in,ayeoicrit
.. iNA4e[fr. q%Sri eek .`16,tOr A Ne.f5i1.r f,amro It;ile 4I).Nor th(,IenP,,,,,"Nx4)910.16
4..11.4

N
.--.
...—
A ;...
.'
..
...
, -
'...'-'
., .. .
. .
.... ...
.. .
,..
/7'...'
..,
=..
/ L
1
11
.. )
). i
..- .'
',...
.
,.
';..„`...,
\\N,,,,,,,
'k,-------..., _ _,.--------
-',,-,.., -- ---
,
...,
'""t,,
...
.-'%,.,.
,...,,,
0 , ,,,„
., s..,,„
0-
a) a) ,:. ,,
,,,,,,
ce E
i= .`y., , ,',....
.
C 12 ,
...-
..
a) 0
7_1 co
...:.. ..,„.
-
•,_— c -,„
....1' CI
S ..,
ic- -
,...< c
— a)
..-
cn ,
LL ....-....
co
LIJ 0
-4-
Zftftft. CD ..
I_L
t—
...' '
th CO 9.
a) N
IJJ 4.. c,-; 0.)
U) c co —
ic- - CNI
O N up
cr) /
ii-5 ® 111 2 8
up
N
I—

E 1 [[E
•
.E
E I
•
•
•
I i
a Q Q Q l a
�..Z._..._Z.. z z z
•
•
I � i
I '
2 Ii
A I
•
•
•
•
•
•
3 I
! I � i
a ' a g g g
zz z z z
•
� I �
a
0 �
I {
E [
0 : 0 O i 0 I 0
E I
s
3
I
uj 3
€ m ° V)
Z N C N V E
(I) tC 0 J O)
0
' `m o
E 0.
d 2 7 "17
_ N
OI O1 7 I C
q d y m Q
N

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: LEE F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MR JOSEPH HUDYNCIA
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
1001 MSC - AGRICULTURE BLDG
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a new
end-around - taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. ?lease review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS R VIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: vl NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: iV)v DATE:
This application
,r.
Did/pid No --have a CREP conservation easement on the subject property
Did/ id Not; have a Swine buyout easement on the subject property
Did/ id not have ADFP easement on the subject property
Did Did N have a plant conservation easement on the subject property
Did/ d Not- have a plant conservation priority site on the subject property
Did I id Not have a VAD (Voluntary,Ag I7i on the subject property area

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW S 1 4 { 8.l f G
COUNTY: LEE F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MS JEANNE STONE
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE PLANNING - MSC 41554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE leanspU►talion Planning
Division
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM NOV F 2019
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a new
end-around - taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REV W THE FOL WING IS SUBMITTED: 4'NO COMMENT l l COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: • r DATE: l —/g--/9

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: LEE
F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-00OG-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/201.9
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MR RODNEY BUTLER
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRM
1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RAT,ErGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRC;NnNIAT, QUALITY
DEPT OE NATURAT, i CLU,TURAL RESOURCE
I)EPI OF TRANSPORTATION
DNOR ATURTI.I„ HERITA.:3E PROGRA
DPS DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE C COG-
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Seeping
DEC: Pr000:ied project is for the development of an area to the sooth of the existing
tormir.al area including site ptepartien for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxIlane, and the connection of the exi .in9 hangar taxilanes to a new
end-arcdnd - taxi lone at the Ralei,.Th ExeciAlve JeLport.
The attact.ed project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intcr,?overnmental review. Please review and submit yot.r repons by the above
indicated. datE to 130 Mail Servj..ce Center, Raleic4h NC 27699-130i.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (91.97-2423.
AS A RESULT OF THIS ,ZIEW THE vOLLOWING IS ITTED: NO COMENT COMMENTS ATTACFEb
SIGNED BY: tolv15-1!"- e DATE:

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: LEE F03:AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000--0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY Received: 11/12/2019
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE. State Historic Preservation Office
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 -- ARCHIVES BUILDIING ER 19-4958
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE [.)lit -- [1/20/19
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OE NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION A- gD,NCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DCS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 1 V I
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Autt Due
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
H_ N
DISC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a now
end-around - taxiiane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review Lime is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: 112 NO COMMENT ! 1 COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: '? i1 t i DATE: t L '
NOV 1 3 1019

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW LOW 4 2019
COUNTY: LEE F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MS CINDY WILLIAMS
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
4218 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG ,
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a new
end-around - taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: ✓NO COMMENT n COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: 214 /SMCA---
DATE: 1lr /0

Appendix F
RALEIGHEXEC
JETPORT
Categorical Exclusion
Michael Baker
INTERNATIONAL

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
APPENDIX A. DOCUMENTED CATEX
Airport sponsors may use this form for projects eligible for a categorical exclusion (CATEX)that have
greater potential for extraordinary circumstances or that otherwise require additional documentation, as
described in the Environmental Orders (FAA Order 1050.1F and FAA Order 5050.4B).
To request a CATEX determination from the FAA, the sponsor should review potentially affected
environmental resources, review the requirements of the applicable special purpose laws, and consult
with the Airports District Office or Regional Airports Division Office staff about the type of
information needed. The form and supporting documentation should be completed in accordance with
the provisions of FAA Order 5050.4B, paragraph 302b, and submitted to the appropriate FAA Airports
District/Division Office. The CATEX cannot be approved until all information/documentation is
received and all requirements have been fulfilled.
Name of Airport, LOC ID, and location:
Raleigh Executive Jetport (TTA), Lee County,NC (refer to Figure 1)
Project Title:
South Terminal Development
Give a brief, but complete description of the proposed project, including all project components,
justification, estimated start date, and duration of the project. Include connected actions necessary to
implement the proposed project (including but not limited to moving NAVAIDs, change in flight
procedures, haul routes, new material or expanded material sources, staging or disposal areas).
Attach a sketch or plan of the proposed project. Photos can also be helpful.
The proposed project includes site preparations for three future box hangars/associated aprons,
improvement of the current taxilane (north of the existing t-hangars) to accommodate ADG II aircraft,
and the connection of the existing t-hangar taxilanes to a new `end-around' taxilane. The existing north
taxilane would be shifted and widened and would continue/extend behind the t-hangars. The remaining
five taxilanes would connect to the new pavement to create a complete taxilane system. Rough grading
and installation and re-routing of storm drainage would occur to the north and west of the t-hangars, to
prepare sites for hangar development. The proposed improvements are shown on Figure 2 (attached).
The improvements are needed to satisfy a growing demand for corporate hangar space at the Airport and
improve traffic flow and connectivity of the hangar area.
Photos of the project study area are included in Appendix A.
Give a brief, but complete, description of the proposed project area. Include any unique or natural
features within or surrounding airport property.
The 27-acre project study area consists of the existing maintained Airport Operations Area(AOA). This
area is maintained and kept in a grassed state and also includes the existing impervious surfaces
associated with the existing taxilanes, hangars, and apron areas.
A-1

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
Identify the appropriate CATEX paragraph(s) from Order 1050.1F (paragraph 5-6.1 through 5-6.6) or
5050.4B (Tables 6-1 and 6-2) that apply to the project. Describe if the project differs in any way from
the specific language of the CATEX or examples given as described in the Order.
Under Order 1050.1F, project would be covered under Section 5-6.4(f). Under Order 5050.4B project
would be covered under, Airfield improvements, storage areas (Table 6-2— 310f).
The proposed project would also be covered under 1050.1F 5-6.4(e) and 5-6.4(o):
e. Federal financial assistance, licensing, or Airport Layout Plan (ALP) approval for the
following actions, provided the action would not result in significant erosion or sedimentation,
and will not result in a significant noise increase over noise sensitive areas or result in significant
impacts on air quality.
• Construction, repair, reconstruction, resurfacing, extending, strengthening, or widening
of a taxiway, apron, loading ramp, or runway safety area(RSA), including an RSA using
Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS); or
• Reconstruction, resurfacing, extending, strengthening, or widening of an existing
runway.
o. Minor trenching and backfilling where the surface is restored and the excavated material is
protected against erosion and run-off during the construction period.
The circumstances one must consider when documenting a CATEX are listed below along with each
of the impact categories related to the circumstance. Use FAA Environmental Orders 1050.1F,
5050.4B, and the Desk Reference for Airports Actions, as well as other guidance documents to assist
you in determining what information needs to be provided about these resource topics to address
potential impacts. Keep in mind that both construction and operational impacts must be included.
Indicate whether or not there would be any effects under the particular resource topic and, if needed,
cite available references to support these conclusions. Additional analyses and inventories can be
attached or cited as needed.
5-2.b(1) National Historic Preservation Act(NHPA) resources YES NO
Are there historic/cultural resources listed(or eligible for listing) on the National X
Register of Historic Places located in the Area of Potential Effect? If yes,provide a
record of the historic and/or cultural resources located therein and check with your
local Airports Division/District Office to determine if a Section 106 finding is
required.
No historic/cultural resources listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places are located in the Area of Potential Effect. The State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) had 'No Comment' on the proposed project (refer to
Appendix B).
Does the project have the potential to cause effects? If yes, describe the nature and X
extent of the effects.
As there are no resources in the Area of Potential Effect, no impacts would be expected
from the proposed project.
A-2

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
Is the project area undisturbed? If not,provide information on the prior disturbance X
(including type and depth of disturbance, if available)
The project study area is located on the portion of the Airport that is maintained in a low-
growing state and in areas that have been previously disturbed for the construction of the
Airport and associated stormwater facilities.
Will the project impact tribal land or land of interest to tribes? If yes, describe the X
nature and extent of the effects and provide information on the tribe affected.
Consultation with their THPO or a tribal representative along with the SHPO may be
required.
The project will not impact tribal land.
Ground Disturbance would occur within existing Airport property.
5-2.b(2)Department of Transportation Act Section 4(f) and 6(f) resources YES NO
Are there any properties protected under Section 4(f) (as defined by FAA Order X
1050.1F) in or near the project area? This includes publicly owned parks, recreation
areas, and wildlife or waterfowl refuges of national, state or local significance or land
from a historic site of national, state or local significance.
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing Airport property and no
Section 4(f) resources are present. SHPO has no comment on the proposed action (refer
to Appendix B).
Will project construction or operation physically or constructively"use" any Section X
4(f)resource? If yes, describe the nature and extent of the use and/or impacts, and
why there are no prudent and feasible alternatives. See 5050.4B Desk Reference
Chapter 7.
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing Airport property and no
Section 4(f)resources are present.
Will the project affect any recreational or park land purchased with Section 6(f) Land X
and Water Conservation Funds? If so, please explain, if there will be impacts to those
properties.
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing Airport property and no
Section 6(f)resources are present.
A-3

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
5-2.b(3) Threatened or Endangered Species YES NO
Are there any federal or state listed endangered, threatened, or candidate species or X
designated critical habitat in or near the project area?This includes species protected by
individual statute, such as the Bald Eagle.
According to North Carolina Natural Heritage Preserve (NCNHP) Data there are no
known occurrences of federal or state listed species within the project study area.Element
occurrence data (Tier One) obtained from: http://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/map.
Additional information regarding project site is below.
Does the project affect or have the potential to affect, directly or indirectly, any federal X
or state-listed, threatened, endangered or candidate species, or designated habitat under
the Endangered Species Act? If yes, Section 7 consultation between the FAA and the
US Fish & Wildlife Service,National Marine Fisheries Service, and/or the appropriate
state agency will be necessary. Provide a description of the impacts and how impacts
will be avoided, minimized, or mitigated. Provide the Biological Assessment and
Biological Opinion, if required.
Based on available data(aerial mapping,USGS Topographic Mapping, Soil Survey Data,
NCNHP Elemental Occurrence Database, USFWS/NCNHP Habitat descriptions), and
field reviews, habitat for federal and/or state listed species is not present within the
footprint of the proposed project.
Federally listed species taken into consideration include:
Cape fear shiner(Notropis mekistocholas);
Red-cockaded woodpecker(Picoides borealis); and,
Harperella(Ptilimnium nodosum).
For the Cape Fear shiner and harperella, no streams occur within the project study area.
Therefore, the implementation of the proposed project would have No Effect on these
species.
Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker is not present within the project study
area. The study area does not contain forested area and only consists of
grassed/maintained areas and impervious surfaces. Therefore, since habitat is not present,
the implementation of the proposed project would have No Effect on red-cockaded
woodpecker.
A-4

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
YES NO
Does the project have the potential to take birds protected by the Migratory Bird X
Treaty Act?Describe steps to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts (such as timing
windows determined in consultation with the US Fish& Wildlife Service).
No clearing would be required for the implementation of the proposed project.
5-2.b (4) Other Resources
Items to consider include:
a. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act YES NO
Does the project area contain resources protected by the Fish and Wildlife X
Coordination Act? If yes, describe any impacts and steps taken to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate impacts.
The Proposed Action is not a water resource development project, and therefore,the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act does not apply.
b.Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. YES NO
Are there any wetlands or other waters of the U.S. in or near the project area? X
There is a wetland system present at the outfall of the existing non jurisdictional
stormwater pond(refer to Figure 2 and wetland mapping in Appendix C).
Has wetland delineation been completed within the proposed project area? If yes, X
please provide U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) correspondence and
jurisdictional determination. If delineation was not completed, was a field check done
to confirm the presence/absence of wetlands or other waters of the U.S.? If no to both,
please explain what methods were used to determine the presence/absence of wetlands.
The project study area is within the area that was delineated and permitted during the
construction of the Airport in the early 2000's and no jurisdictional features were
identified and/or impacted (refer to Appendix C).
The previously identified wetland and stream limits were imported into a Geographic
Information System (GIS) and were overlain on aerial photographs, National Wetland
Inventory (NWI) mapping, U.S. Geological Service (USGS) Topographic Mapping,
LiDAR Mapping, and the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey.
This information was then used to verify the accuracy of previous wetland delineations
in GIS, to determine if any additional jurisdictional areas were likely to be present.
In addition, the area south of the project was field delineated in October of 2019 (refer to
map in Appendix C). The upper limits of jurisdictional resources terminated downstream
of the existing stormwater pond. The project study area drains to the stormwater pond
via the gully/ditch as identified on the wetland delineation mapping. Neither of these
resources were identified as jurisdictional features. The gully/ditch that drains the project
A-5

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
study area does not connect to a jurisdictional feature (wetland identified as Wetland W3
in the delineation mapping) until it exits the stormwater pond to the southeast. These
areas were field reviewed/verified by the USACE on January 29, 2020.
If wetlands are present, will the project result in impacts, directly or indirectly X
(including tree clearing)? Describe any steps taken to avoid, minimize or mitigate the
impact.
Approximately 0.1-acre of wetland impact would be required for the installation of outlet
protection(rip-rap) at the outfall of the existing stormwater pond(refer to Figure 2). It is
anticipated that if mitigation is required for this impact, credits would be purchased from
the North Carolina Department of Mitigation Services, In-Lieu Fee Program
Is a USACE Clean Water Act Section 404 permit required? If yes, does the project X
fall within the parameters of a general permit? If so,which general permit?
A Section 404 permit would be required for the rip-rap placement. The impact is within
the thresholds (0.5-acre) for a Nationwide Permit 14 and/or 39. The USACE has also
indicated that modifying the permit that was issued in 2019 for the North Terminal Area
Development to cover this impact is also a possibility (refer to correspondence in
Appendix B).
c. Floodplains YES NO
Will the project be located in, encroach upon or otherwise impact a floodplain? If yes, X
describe impacts and any agency coordination or public review completed including
coordination with the local floodplain administrator. Attach the FEMA map if
applicable and any documentation.
The project study area is not within a mapped floodplain:
(http://fris.nc.gov/fris_hardfiles/nc/hardfiles/DFIRM/105/DFIRM_NC_3710966600K.p
df).
Copy of FEMA map is included in Appendix D.
d. Coastal Resources YES NO
Will the project occur in or impact a coastal zone as defined by the State's Coastal X
Zone Management Plan? If yes, discuss the project's consistency with the State's
CZMP. Attach the consistency determination if applicable.
Lee County is not a Coastal County as defined by the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management.
Will the project occur in or impact the Coastal Barrier Resource System as defined by X
the US Fish and Wildlife Service?
According to the USFWS there are no Coastal Barriers near the project study area.
(https://www.fws.gov/CBRA/Maps/Mapper.html)
A-6

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
e. National Marine Sanctuaries YES NO
Is a National Marine Sanctuary located in the project area? If yes, discuss the potential X
for the project to impact that resource.
According to NOAA, no National Marine Sanctuaries are located in the project study
area. (http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov)
f. Wilderness Areas YES NO
Is a Wilderness Area located in the project area? If yes, discuss the potential for the X
project to impact that resource.
According to the United States Park Service, no Wilderness Areas are located in the
project study area or the general vicinity.
g. Farmland YES NO
Is there prime, unique, state, or locally important farmland in/near the project area? X
Describe any significant impacts from the project.
No farmland is present with the project study area, which occurs within existing Airport
property.
Does the project include the acquisition and conversion of farmland? If farmland will X
be converted, describe coordination with the US Natural Resources Conservation and
attach the completed Form AD-1006.
The proposed project is located on existing Airport property and; therefore, would be
classified as developed urban land and not as farmland. No acquisition of farmland would
occur.
h. Energy Supply and Natural Resources YES NO
Will the project change energy requirements or use consumable natural resources X
either during construction or during operations?
The increase in power usage would be comparable to that of the existing hangars and
would not be expected to significantly alter or overly burden the power supply in the
general vicinity.
Will the project change aircraft/vehicle traffic patterns that could alter fuel usage X
either during construction or operations?
The implementation of the proposed project would not alter existing traffic patterns at the
Airport. Distances that aircraft have to travel to access runway would not change as a
result of the proposed project.
A-7

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
i.Wild and Scenic Rivers YES NO
Is there a river on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, a designated river in the National X
System, or river under State jurisdiction (including study or eligible segments) near the
project?
No Wild and Scenic Rivers are found within or near the project study area.
(http://www.rivers.gov/maps/conus.php).
Will the project directly or indirectly affect the river or an area within '/4 mile of its X
ordinary high water mark?
Not applicable.
j. Solid Waste Management YES NO
Does the project (either the construction activity or the completed, operational X
facility)have the potential to generate significant levels of solid waste? If so, discuss
how these will be managed.
Some construction debris would likely be generated as the result of the construction of
the hangars; however, the amount of debris would not be expected to be significant. The
contractor would be required to remove all construction debris from the Airport and
dispose of it properly in a permitted facility. Once the new hangars are operational, any
solid waste that would be generated would be similar in kind and amount as the existing
facilities.
5-2.b(5)Disruption of an Established Community
YES NO
Will the project disrupt a community,planned development or be inconsistent with X
plans or goals of the community?
The proposed project is located on the existing Airport property and no other property
would be required.
Are residents or businesses being relocated as part of the project? X
The proposed project is located on the existing Airport property and no relocations would
occur as a result of the proposed project.
5-2.b(6) Environmental Justice YES NO
Are there minority and/or low-income populations in/near the project area? X
The proposed project is located on the existing Airport property and no other property
would be required.
Will the project cause any disproportionately high and adverse impacts to minority X
and/or low-income populations?Attach census data if warranted.
The proposed project would not result in off-Airport impacts.
A-8

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
5-2.b(7) Surface Transportation YES NO
Will the project cause a significant increase in surface traffic congestion or cause a X
degradation of level of service provided?
The proposed project would serve aircraft currently using the airport and would not be
expected to cause a significant increase in surface traffic congestion.
Will the project require a permanent road relocation or closure? If yes, describe the X
nature and extent of the relocation or closure and indicate if coordination with the
agency responsible for the road and emergency services has occurred.
No roads would be relocated or closed as a result of the proposed project.
5-2.b(8) Noise YES NO
Will the project result in an increase in aircraft operations, nighttime operations, or X
change aircraft fleet mix?
Based on FAA Order 1050.1F, a noise analysis does not need to be conducted for the
proposed project if the forecasted airport operations are (1) less than 90,000 annual or
247 average daily, piston-powered aircraft (Design Group I and II) operations in
Approach Categories A through D that have a landing speed of less than 166 knots; or,
(2) there are less than 700 annual, or two average daily,jet-powered aircraft operations
that occur at the Airport. Based on review of the FAA's 2019 Terminal Area Forecast, a
total of 63,000 annual operations (per year) are anticipated at TTA for each year of the
upcoming 12-year period.
Will the project cause a change in airfield configuration, runway use, or flight X
patterns either during construction or after the project is implemented?
The Proposed Action would not modify runway or flight patterns.
Does the forecast exceed 90,000 annual propeller operations, 700 annual jet operations X
or 10 daily helicopter operations or a combination of the above? If yes, a noise analysis
may be required if the project would result in a change in operations.
Based on FAA Order 1050.1F, a noise analysis does not need to be conducted for the
proposed project if the forecasted airport operations are (1) less than 90,000 annual or
247 average daily, piston-powered aircraft (Design Group I and II) operations in
Approach Categories A through D that have a landing speed of less than 166 knots; or,
(2) there are less than 700 annual, or two average daily,jet- powered aircraft operations
that occur at the Airport. Based on review of the FAA's 2019 Terminal Area Forecast, a
total of 63,000 annual operations (per year) are anticipated at TTA for each year of the
upcoming 12-year period.
A-9

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
Has a noise analysis been conducted, including but not limited to generated noise X
contours, a specific point analysis, area equivalent method analysis, or other
screening method. If yes, provide that documentation.
As stated above,TTA is below the forecast thresholds that would require a noise analysis.
Could the project have a significant impact(DNL 1.5 dB or greater increase) on noise X
levels over noise sensitive areas within the 65+DNL noise contour?
As stated above,TTA is below the forecast thresholds that would require a noise analysis.
5-2.b(9) Air Quality YES NO
Is the project located in a Clean Air Act non-attainment or maintenance area? X
Lee County is not listed by the USEPA as either non-attainment, or maintenance.
If yes, is it listed as exempt, presumed to conform or will emissions (including
construction emissions) from the project be below de minimis levels (provide the
paragraph citation for the exemption or presumed to conform list below, if
applicable) Is the project accounted for in the State Implementation Plan or
specifically exempted?Attach documentation.
Not applicable.
Does the project have the potential to increase landside or airside capacity, X
including an increase of surface vehicles?
The construction of the hangars would result in additional hangar capacity; however, the
additional hangars would not result in a significant increase in operations. Since the
proposed project is within an attainment area and is not anticipated to have a significant
increase in operations, per the FAA Aviation Emissions and Air Quality Handbook, a
detailed Quantitative Air Quality Analysis was not completed for the proposed project.
Could the project impact air quality or violate local, State, Tribal or Federal air X
quality standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 either during
construction or operations?
As stated above, the proposed project is in an attainment area.
5-2.b (10)Water Quality YES NO
Are there water resources within or near the project area? These include groundwater, X
surface water(lakes, rivers, etc.), sole source aquifers, and public water supply. If yes,
provide a description of the resource, including the location(distance from project site,
etc.).
There is one wetland system present in the project study area, which ultimately drains to
a stream (unnamed tributary to Hughes Creek) outside the project study area (refer to
Figure 2 and wetland mapping in Appendix C).According to the North Carolina Division
of Environmental Quality,Hughes Creek is classified as WS-IV waters,which is defined
A-10

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
as waters used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing
purposes where a WS-I, II or III classification is not feasible.
Using the EPA's NEPAssit program,no sole source aquifers appear to be present within,
or near the project study area.
Will the project impact any of the identified water resources either during construction X
or operations? Describe any steps that will be taken to protect water resources during
and after construction.
To minimize temporary impacts to water quality, the contractor would be required to
comply with erosion and sediment control measures as specified in FAA Advisory
Circular (AC) 150/5370-10 entitled Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports,
and specifically Item P-156 Temporary Air and Water Pollution, Soil Erosion, and
Siltation Control. All temporary stormwater management techniques would be designed
to ensure they are not in conflict with AC 5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on
or Near Airports.
Will the project increase the amount or rate of stormwater runoff either during X
construction or during operations?Describe any steps that will be taken to ensure it
will not impact water quality.
A State Approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan would be required to ensure that
the proposed project meets state and federal stormwater requirements.
Does the project have the potential to violate federal, state,tribal or local water X
quality standards established under the Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Acts?
No.
XAre any water quality related permits required? If yes, list the appropriate permits.
NCDEQ—Land Disturbance Permit
NCDEQ— Section 401 Water Quality Certification
USACE— Section 404 Permit
Responses to agency coordination letter dated November 18, 2019, from the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (included in Appendix B) are included in Appendix
E.
A-11

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
5-2.b(11) Highly Controversial on Environmental Grounds YES NO
Is the project highly controversial? The term "highly controversial" means a substantial X
dispute exists as to the size, nature, or effect of a proposed federal action. The effects of
an action are considered highly controversial when reasonable disagreement exists over
the project's risks of causing environmental harm. Mere opposition to a project is not
sufficient to be considered highly controversial on environmental grounds. Opposition
on environmental grounds by a federal, state, or local government agency or by a tribe or
a substantial number of the persons affected by the action should be considered in
determining whether or not reasonable disagreement exists regarding the effects of a
proposed action.
Due to the minimal amount of impact anticipated to occur and that the project study
area is within existing Airport property,the proposed improvements are not anticipated
to be highly controversial.
5-2.b(12)Inconsistent with Federal, State, Tribal or Local Law YES NO
Will the project be inconsistent with plans, goals,policy, zoning, or local controls X
p Y� g�
that have been adopted for the area in which the airport is located?
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing Airport property and the
surrounding area is rural in nature.
Is the project incompatible with surrounding land uses? X
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing Airport property and the
surrounding area is rural in nature.
5-2 .b (13) Light Emissions,Visual Effects, and Hazardous Materials
a. Light Emissions and Visual Effects YES NO
Will the proposed project produce light emission impacts? X
Although the proposed project would result in additional lighting for the hangar
buildings, the changes would be insignificant and there are no residences in close
proximity to the airfield. Parcels adjacent to the Airport property boundary are
undeveloped,providing a buffer for potential light emission impacts.
Will there be visual or aesthetic impacts as a result of the proposed project and/or X
have there been concerns expressed about visual/aesthetic impacts?
As stated above there are no residences in close proximity to the airfield and parcels
adjacent to the Airport property boundary are undeveloped, providing a buffer for
potential aesthetic impacts.
A-12

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
b. Hazardous Materials YES NO
Does the project involve or affect hazardous materials? X
Hazardous materials are not anticipated to be involved with the proposed improvements.
Will construction take place in an area that contains or previously contained X
hazardous materials?
Based on review of the USEPA NEPAssist website (including RCRA, air emissions,
water dischargers, toxic releases, Superfund, and Brownfields databases), no known
hazardous substances or sites were identified on, or adjacent to, the Airport.
In addition, the NCDEQ Federal Remediation Branch indicated that no known federal
remediation sites are within 1.0-mile of the project study area(refer to Appendix B).
If the project involves land acquisition, is there a potential for this land to contain X
hazardous materials or contaminants?
The proposed project would occur entirely within existing Airport property and would
not require additional land acquisition.
Will the proposed project produce hazardous and/or solid waste either during X
construction or after? If yes, how will the additional waste be handled?
Some solid waste in the form of construction debris would be expected to be produced as
a result of the construction. All construction debris would be removed from the site and
disposed of properly in a permitted solid waste facility.
5-2 .b (14) Public Involvement
YES NO
Was there any public notification or involvement? If yes,provide documentation. X
5-2 .b (15) Indirect/Secondary/Induced Impacts
YES NO
Will the project result in indirect/secondary/induced impacts? X
No additional indirect/secondary/induced impacts would be expected as a result of the
proposed project.
When considered with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future X
projects, on or off airport property and regardless of funding source, would the
proposed project result in a significant cumulative impact?
The construction of the Airport resulted in additional impervious surfaces. Future Airport
improvements would also likely add additional impervious surface (refer to Airport
Layout Drawing—Appendix F). These additional impervious surfaces could increase the
A-13

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
amount of runoff into nearby surface waters. However, the Proposed Action and other
future improvements impacting greater than one acre would be required to complete the
NPDES permitting process and review of the Stormwater Management Plan prior to
construction. These efforts would minimize the amount of stormwater runoff entering into
surface waters and result in avoidance of cumulative impacts to water quality near the
Airport.
Past impacts to wetlands and streams have occurred from residential, commercial, and
industrial development within and adjacent to the Airport, where wetlands have been
filled, drained, or otherwise altered. In addition,natural streams within the area have also
been channelized for silviculture and agriculture.
Executive Order 11990 and the CWA Section 404 process have dramatically reduced the
rate of wetland loss; however, wetland loss is likely to continue. The protection of
wetlands is regulated on a case-by-case basis by state and federal agencies and mitigation
for permitted impacts is typically required. To fill wetlands or other waters of the United
States, a permit would have to be granted by USACE prior to construction of projects and
a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from NCDEQ would also be required.
Mitigation may be required for impacts, which would offset the wetland loss associated
with future development projects. Therefore,with USACE and NCDEQ oversight as well
as mitigation requirements, the potential impacts to wetlands from projects occurring in
the area would be minimized.
The Proposed Action is anticipated to result in approximately 0.10-acre of wetland
impact. In addition, future development at the Airport could potentially result in impacts
to wetlands and other jurisdictional waters of the United States. The Cape Fear River
Basin is estimated to contain 6,386 miles stream and 68,884 acres of water resources.1'2
Impacts resulting from the Proposed Action would affect a minute percent of stream
length and wetland acreage when compared to the totals in the river basin. As a result,
no significant cumulative impacts to streams on and in the vicinity of the Airport would
be anticipated.
Past and present residential and commercial development in the vicinity of the project
study area has impacted wetlands and streams such as Hughes Creek and its tributaries.
These activities will continue in the future regardless of the status of the Proposed Action,
and the cumulative effects from implementation of the Proposed Action are not expected
to result in an increase of negative impacts to wetlands and/or streams.
Therefore, no significant cumulative impacts are anticipated.
1 NCDWQ,Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan,2005.p.,xxii,
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/W ater%20Quality/Planning/BPU/BPU/CapeFear/Cape%20Fear%20Plans/2006%20Plan/executi
ve%20summary.pdf(March 18,2020).
2 NCDEQ. Cape Fear River Basin,https://deq.nc.gov/cape-fear-river-basin(March 18,2020).
A-14

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
Permits
List any permits required for the proposed project that have not been previously discussed. Provide
details on the status of permits.
Permits/Approvals:
NCDEQ—Water Quality Certification(To be submitted)
USACE—Section 404 Permit (To be submitted)
NCDEQ—Sediment and Erosion Control Permit(To be submitted)
Environmental Commitments
List all measures and commitments made to avoid, minimize, mitigate, and compensate for
impacts on the environment, which are needed for this project to qualify for a CATEX.
To minimize temporary impacts to water quality, the contractor would be required to comply with
erosion and sediment control measures as specified in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5370-10
entitled Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports, and specifically Item P-156 Temporary Air
and Water Pollution, Soil Erosion, and Siltation Control. All temporary stormwater management
techniques would be designed to ensure they are not in conflict with AC 5200-33B,Hazardous Wildlife
Attractants on or Near Airports.
Unforeseen cultural resources could potentially be discovered during project construction. If cultural
resources or remains were found during construction of the Preferred Alternative, all work would cease
in the immediate area and federal regulations pertaining to emergency discovery would be adhered to
at that time. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, the NCDOT, FAA, and SHPO would be notified so
that a qualified professional could evaluate the resources. Work would be able to continue in areas
where no cultural resources were discovered.
If encountered during construction, contaminated soil or other hazardous materials would be tested and
removed and/or treated in accordance with USEPA and NCDENR requirements. A Spill Prevention,
Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)plan would be in place to address accidental releases of fuel or
hydraulic fluids from construction equipment. In the event a spill occurs during construction,work will
stop until the National Response Center is notified at 1-800-424-8802 and any required action is taken.
If any live bird nests are encountered during construction, the Sponsor will notify FAA/NCDOT to
determine if coordination with USFWS is required under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
A-15

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
Preparer Information
Point of Contact: Michael Baker International, Inc. Attn: Ed Smail
Address: 4425 Belle Oaks Drive
City: North Charleston State: SC Zip Code: 29405
Phone: [phone] Email Address: esmail(a),mbalkerintl.com
Signature: - Date: 4/18/2020
Airport Sponsor Information and Certification (may not be delegated to consultant)
Provide contact information for the designated sponsor point of contact and any other
individuals requiring notification of the FAA decision.
Point of Contact: Sanford -Lee County Airport Authority—Mr. Bob Heuts
Address: 700 Rod Sullivan Road
City: Sanford State: NC Zip Code: 27330
Phone Number: 919-776-2939 Email Address:[e-mail]
Additional Name(s): Additional Email Address(es):
I certify that the information I have provided above is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I
also recognize and agree that no construction activity,including but not limited to site preparation,
demolition, or land disturbance, shall proceed for the above proposed project(s)until FAA issues
a final environmental decision for the proposed project(s) and until compliance with all other
applicable FAA approval actions (e.g., ALP approval, airspace approval, grant approval) has
occurred.
Signature: 7,1, „t- 2 , Date: 31 ,) Q
, f ca n
A-16

Effective Date: June 2, 2017 ARP SOP No. 5.1
FAA Decision
Having reviewed the above information, it is the FAA's decision that the proposed project (s) or
development warrants environmental processing as indicated below.
Name of Airport, LOC ID, and location:
Raleigh Executive Jetport (TTA), Lee County,NC
Project Title: South Terminal Development
No further NEPA review required. Project is categorically excluded per(-eeite--app-itabiu,
--3- 5-(o. (4-)'\ 5-4:y(e Q S- ,L\(ti).
❑ An Environmental Assessment(EA) is required.
❑ An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is required.
❑ The following additional documentation is necessary for FAA to perform a complete
environmental evaluation of the proposed project.
Name: �a�Cbe\ik ill. ,1L“c.1-SOY\ Title:k l`111V1 "1-Y\ TOMSVn �a5Y r
Responsible FAA Official
Signature: %r,d4/14---, Date: -j J ) Z D Z 0
A-17

Figures

LOCATION MAP ,';, �• 0 ``'J r _ t` � J 1ii1� , �\ %\ i 1�`-jl // . Jr,', I ''•- �1. .
3 ' 'A3 ,��• _ ` .II • 1 /i ' f/\ I Legend
} Proposed Action
') A_ I �: cnle6d .�� ; - �-1 = -ems —Existing Airport Facilities
r f ! $L!:1 A 1.., i3 �`-,1, ] L /■! �' !T , m - -Airport Property Boundary
i 1 t` ���� ' �: I 1� j+, ! ---)�,�I � � OProject Study Area Boundary
a If
fr.. l' 1.�'' �� , ry A. 1 � tl r r o - , F
_ I , I y..443
` • - '` '' A (R „� 1' • 1 •
I I N ' r rlr � L-
ji?
--C Ir I1, C„ 1 /1, /1 Lg/�... ,NI', �
\j., r\—n iK/ ,k',,,,,, ) .111c„. A, IP I. .„1/1. 714'
0----_ ' ,..), 1..kk), --(jf1'.")\ .} . ,/ - ''?P -,.•4. _ - i __------ —
,\,:c2,) .8//, 1 :.0' "- --- :----7EIL----,---4- _)-
\ /\\\.._. \-_.;/- -1,.
•
,300w '. f' l f -;D J "` ' �i� I�. i - i '� ,5 ---�.1 — + �
r-_)---/-,
'.5� \h„,._"1
t�=` � J 1 '+I I QO_,Ar/ ) f%/ ��it/
--�'—`\=� __ I 'Y, _ fig`,, J.
` + J. : �,. � f ' ,� (�LLIVq►� J' * d n. .. - -cry
� yyrr�+� • / ��� .� �--`..} N, ' �T�—_] /lam
11 < Q/vL T•�,Ilk is r r f, .wM��
ylit.::a PROJECT STUDY AREA i' �1 / =. r^ ��
nit, Al/� ► , r
t ,---_.-La\-1---- ---"\,,,,--z..,, .. \
•
, , -,.,. .2:__72- I ,Iii(// .:ty%‘:k.. k‘.`, .1„.7) //, -41-- / 'it, .,' __/\ 1,.:-:1 ,_ _____,- i i ,
r1-. 4---<::::7k - 1.,-. /) •,,,:41 -V " . . .;-,-,,/,/ v it) i ' i---'\--- -r:t•- -:-: -------\ II - ) :-...-'-iL " —
:::61-4-:',__.:: ‘v
S 1�y; I -- 4:/./1/ii/'\(,',.'7•'4'...-4114 -7:.1"/14111111,---)- '7\%:;, ikt .,‘\::^-, 1.,. ,\-----N----(-711:3.31:4_51
in, ,,I ii► i ■ l , i f J M1 N ,tiar . III
, )•:( •'" / •1) '----.1 i
\_j,y, .).P....,,
\,,i..4,),,\3 u
')'','--
I/.„/--W,-,_%,',z-
—.')jj i,,
LJ i. _J ,'c3 ,, 1,P.eV\\__L i_4N_t,,.tk,,,L.i--.s,o_,1„1v.m a,_-,e
►, ` 4—, --
/.,
F'.)1.,
ti 1 , --. i Zig `-'V— J` -mil
_A,,-,AkN,,,;,,%,,
--.,-
Virginia I RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
\l1Sii#,r r!
Tennessee ����#■�,� � (�� �� CHATHAM k4 t, --
4,........���`1 �� ' ,` '�, N SOUTH DEVELOPMENT AREA
��71 -� �� % - ` LEE COUNTY,N.C.
.�� �llOk 1 . it st(bi/ 1
j' Project == DATE:MARCH 18,N.C.
Location r
020
���� *� I����� ''.t { Q� p . -; MONCURE 7.5'USGS
SHEET 1 OF 2 TOPO
South Carolina 410��IF I ti, MOORE HARNETT ,�, I�
Georgia Lee County 1��Atlantic w, 5 0 1,00o z,000
Ocean ` ; ' Feet
�' `'�-f 1 inch=2,000 feet

STUDY AREA // I
��
/ Proposed Hangars Legend
/ / Q Project Study Area Boundary
/ ! ,'`V `'� Proposed Action/ izow,-....., _se
/ *•F . —Existing Airport Facilities
,,,
./ii,
i / !�`' �`is ��(.1
---Airport Property Boundary
PROJECT STUDY AREA // // `� ,��
i 11 li Tit L-. s
..4044 I
1,,
/ /
y
/:
Proposed Apronsrr
Wit` 1 �y
//4/•./, //.,i,,r//
l t.0'4i`!f-"i;,/.-./..‘li•4.oit..-r“/
' " "}".r7,,/i i,..111- ' a / ' /,, .*„,"_.-< K•i-rt
4./
K4 F"; `L. s. / i i. �_` ♦ = ,.r
i 1.
./,,..,1,....4..N/b.417 1,0.
-.,-A4,.4
a.4,.srI oi,4I-W_Vt-_—
4i.m-.p•..Z.-...:k.....*..•%.i.r.._4 AO4.%#,1 4.,.*
..-,a..7.„-_i--
./.-..I
L1—
i i.rA..
.i.
,
♦ y�
-i-
1„ ` ,� Proposed Taxilane ' / ! w ♦♦♦ -..::- ♦ y
/ ♦ "`• ♦♦♦ " _ % 7 - Proposed Taxilane
"',�' e+. '� err 4 , /' i ♦♦ 4
q r_y ,
, �/ / / _ 'fir . ..
/ , ' ��Stormwater Pond / / �/ * ♦ 4 �`
r / r ♦*
, ,i .c6,,,,,, 7
Niilts441.4r
4// - /j , ,.. , - Iv 4,.., ,„ •% all
// �' " " t �� tA
RALEIGH EXECUTIVE JETPORT
/� / / y .r
�/ 1/'
Wetland Impact at Pond Outfall ::. y SOUTH DEVELOPMENT AREA
/e N LEE COUNTY,N.C.
//' DATE:MARCH 18, 2020
r- -
�; _ MONCURE 7.5'USGS TOPO
///�' ; - -,41Jurisdictional Wetland 411111114"
r, Allilk SHEET 2OF2
0 100 200
fi .. \ T�.r'i►,V . '1 y Feet
' ► +' 1 inch=200 feet
��� fit'. ._ ,• _ _ -

Appendix A
Site Photographs

Site Photographs—Raleigh Executive Jetport
- -
11111111111111MMINEMI1111111
..1120141
,,. .
- •
• ,
:i-
.71, - ••-•....:,• -_•:.-• .
me...-- ,i
1 .
• --, A
,- -------1,-- - ii . , 7' _,
- ------ 1-111110111Elit . . - ._
—liar—
. . .
. .. .. .
',",n-,.1=r7,-,,-;'--'.'_4',,,,,.....:7-1g,, ,.-0-„, -41*---!:,-*-0*-4SAitOkr'r7-,,,,,-;‘,1:, ..,- :- . - — • -• -'•. -•----. ;;',:I•t-:.-...4.2..:.-•:.--,•,,,,,,,F;pt --r.','--,..4:--4.0irs .•' ---'. "'"''':, -,
'. . ::'. :'-'*',41al'..:;:::41.1. .V 73-:5'..;':', ,. '...''''..'..4::!-'4'.'''''':..'1'.''',4'.;''''.1.i:i,i't'4.,':..aibM0... .7 JW.11'111.'i'Vt141P,P4r),,'.''..,(.,-.,....-.!..4:,..i.:,r,#::...:. ...:',....%4"2,4•',.;,,:,,,,,/?..3.'",...,'' ,..,.:.,,
'' ''''''' ' '. "'' ''.'"r'''''. . '.' ,C'"..'.4!II.'.H.6:'''''''':".0 r''''44'.....'.4'31,'CP7FW.:1',4'''..%;"'.' .rie • .S. .a =-4..!k„-_,.5,-.,.,-..,:11".-N .-, .*,^.- ,:__,:„.. .-,,,,..-7-L.,,.....
.. ..,, — .„,; :,,,,.--,,....-..,;-;.:.,,,. . ..,1,-..,,,-.-A9,,,,,. -..... .. :. .-. .,..:::,:f,.. ......i.:,-.,-' it.. -4...- •-lvrcknie0;400.**,..•-- ; '-:- - 0 -•---'. •-- ---.„---,--',..,...„.:: 4,--
, . .
,•:•-4. - . • .1 .-• i. ,,,..44%.14 w.,,,,4,-,:r- ....,*.r.-074.vtof,4=A.,- -....0 •',.-4 ' ..' %.,.T1-.171j-:LA.:.....*.--A''''' '''e''''-'
0 e..A.,)1'-,-'''.,-1:',F.,,"'.. .f;,"41iiti-...- '-', :'" '• ''.'' k,i..4.i."'. .
-. I 0...,:e ,,,-.'-: . 2'.'• • • .,-,. ,-: ,":.;:l.',j. r„. _. ' - ,
. . . .
Photograph 1: Looking East at Future Hangar Area

•
•
•
•
•
•
.ii,..,,F;.,,i'.1.Vi-'..-;',.. - . . . • 1 - .. : , .
�N.! y;'e , P . ilhN ..k : qt x io,'-,; 2
1 -t—`t%w ¢ 0.v°,i a4i Y"o Fi, 1 V t 4 , _ ii
.'��N j 4r .r« 4,y 1. �,
•
•
• q it _ ••
_ }t S S +f :y''. y
,�i • ct''. i K ti 4 ; ,-' Z` 3' _: t� i�j { l`i ,�1 '3y, }'
•
•
•
. ... v a..._ .,..ram r .. .. • -- ,, -..
Photograph 2: Looking North at Area of Future Taxilane

•
. ,
_ I
---' .r.-,.....-
_ -
--- - [4'4. ---lej---• ____4ffikailr '''-.W4--,:::;:,----1,-.-'4- --i'-'----,.- ---v--'' ----.•--- " ' :z,..„....,,,,,i,'".•,. "c'A'74e,‘,44,. ....!,---%-_-, ,-,,• ,, „7,.---- ;727_-.,, • .
---:•-_ _:-.-_ '--____ ,--"•*-,-;-----Z --,- -,'----=----7•:'-- --:'-_- ''-r"':`-`-•'''' _•---;--_-;,4-, ,et',"'-''''''-- 7 :-.--,,,„.:---,.„, -.7i-i7.,„..;7.,-.:6- •-''...,,.-:_:47,, • -
M._ _ - - .------l---;..--- __ .---2 - --:,• ',,i•S.-'.,...*' ''' ..,,.-: '...-- .-,-'11V-,-.7 4. ,0: ":" -,::_',•..-,4•••.• '-••'',-,•••`- : -. - - '••-• -,..,-- '-'•- ,...,..--
_ ---, - =--- -7.•-...,-..------fq: .....-1-_ -.:.•;-••• -',,..‘,- • -.••_:; ‘,-;••-,"--" "--'?,'"-'- "•°`"'',"r-: ,',- .."-'' r_ ''''' r - - ---- ----
..v I.. ''''' '- -7,4....4Att041.•',--• 1.
,Tx*--,,--- "''''7,---,.. -'•"- ,,f-<,'''',--. ---"'• A 1 A , ,,,.,„•:‘, ;:,,,,,,t, ,f:, ,e la'i*'-'-'''e..-'''t'''''Vei0i1:- ;,'-r.44)4SYT;A6/"'- 664f" ,P 41:ir...N' 4-.•%.-07;,"'••/i4,44,....il-
--r. , ,'.,,,J-hrit; ,"41;; - '.7.,,,`,..- ,y44 'I'
4. Z.,,,,... .-k',.,-- -'1;"- ". - ' '•4-r '''' : ,„0, 'dr.' ‘0:- -, -2;414 ' r 4.1; 'elti.„q
,..-1'---2_-1-4._;44-- -=, -„- 4',',1". -` . ,440t ,-;'-",. )c ,,,4*14-,‘7,-',' r ;.f',. -4'S',,=.,, l' '";.Y-`
...7.- '','•L- ,.-14•T--3.-'''-----:-- --, -''' ,r': - , .- ..,‘:,,,.."*.t' :'-..trt'''''',•''''';q,'" •-t,4-a 904., ,,, '-- ,,,, .:t+. i,t4 t, , '''''' '•'IP"'V i .), r '4'' 5,,'.7...itl. .t.-4"'4ro• i'''• N'4C
",- -- -'7;Y-'45-C-4:.'-',,Z-1.2--',,S--'-'' , ...e-re.i,'`. .'' ,f:' '[ "--.1 `,-',$;•;". '''.* `-'-k, (r,,-„t 4.r.t,t,,,,lot-''„LP?.4,'„•.,.,,pi,,m, ,',±.,',,:ryt Iv'11,7,,,',,),e, ,;k.`,047,?' , , 0.',"4,4t,,„,, 11''',4t .
t", ---',..--nY:---. „, --,,..1,74;: ,-..*!e..,4,-,A,...,fe,;,,-,;(',',-,,'"iiiiS,0' ,„-w:-1,;,-.:;z.ri,-,f,-'2.,;.,,`p,.. .,..",-......,„1,`O y;,.,iti,IV*14ftf-•10V.0 .-477 „i4„,''''tt..„'' ; 1:61,174dt/04.9r).• ",',et ";','t '44,1"1„:":...li,,'? ' 'i ,,'',,,':4,. `:4'.1'"
- ...'1''''''' •-;--. ' ---- 'a'-- '''',.4.''''''''Il-'''''ka..0%4 , ..,..--*--; ''' •'' `,-,140,---Fir,--*,7,-."- .",,,, *'''''',/',4-,.g.'Ve:L414,• •,,,,IN,,,',J$ cOt''4 A -',.: fSf;',#7i,v,,.4,}4,,,,", ,r;on tp,4, Si, •',',,,twri4r,v,'., 0 4.,;,,w,.,
- -_. ,--- ----- ----. .-..- ._ ..-7,4emw.4,t,p,,,,,:,.A--. ' ,,, , g t-,.... ,4:4
;,,.._,----_-„,,,,, 4,_-_-A.V.,„- _ ,.-:=, .., vr*V.,,,,i',-r 1 g471.404-em '. ' 4k.01 ,...",, ,,,,...40„..41, ,,,,,-i- ,),;.i, .1.44,4,6,..., 0'1., A-..,•44,4i,,,-zr-,,L,„-t.),,,,,9:#;,,,r,k-44,,•,.lrve"4„,Xel„';,,,,silir.01- lic;',..•',.;1 ,.,.7,-.'r.Ar.;.-410:1414:,„
„11710,-:„:'-7,- ,-4-apw,,,,-.-„,...,.-,„, -.;_.;:r"-.,,A,,, " -.J.;*. ,,o,),'0., 114t4trk-riM'VL,N-,''F',..!z-....,,.,i'rNirr,
' , rf_t'"--- ,-''','_!",,T.F,,,,..;- ,`„ , - •,:',.",,,,;*?4;7(.1P',,. - -_, .1c.p?-17'. .„..g..iit;V,.4,'-'h_.', 23';''''' ;:.:40 '":"; 4.•.' r4. ..,, ,,, 4,,,,:,17:46,,,...),11p*v.:,,,..i,;0,,,,:'..,4,,,,,:z.,';-, %;70't,r,r,",•,-*-•tv.:40,-,:,,.., ,••,..1'.,:--,--
-`-' "- 7444--'.- ,-,_, .,-,'. -,.., 1, ',-";:4,:,7-4,--.._ ,.... '4,-'41-47,7'.,,, ,',, ,,,,,,i,•:.-- ,:.0 4 i'l,, ,r sx0,:r,,. .,0i'4.,r.i,',,, . ,P,i,t,t''' #,Wtivy4"..3,,,;,..,,,prid,'•t4r., 64ve,,itt ..,t4.:4,,, ,,,t,t414,',t.,4,g•niq.'" ,' ,,j.01
- • r , ,'''''*':-.' '. )' :v.;i!'.. V,I.T.''''n.1-'.!!,.:"r 1; V,'4. '':4',''Y.,Vtr'r.p. _,, ft7r4,.",' ,;;;.,.,,_''l'•, ,:-. '•,' ----:•""Pr*\ 14tPr: .';"'fir:r:"',./4r2) n;',
1,
._,- t ,_ ir, Ler'l.Tviv'', . :"V'.44-51 , '- ---1` -•,. 07,41-44 tri4-4 .;_err•- ,;$4 ‘. ' tt,',AZI:t.''441 -"',:3•''1'"-7---'
_.,4..L.,..-.;=. ,i V.!..,t--;;14,,,i,r4,'_,P.-.".
,7,:' , ; .."4.14g.-N--0-'-! --, '.„ --c... ; r',"‘,.. '`,. ,,,,,t;'2 ,0' ,',IL;, ';',f;4'.YA041',vet'cOir14.-:''.z%itk W,11:2- 7,3',`7-''C' - ' A ''%50,:,}.1',A •,1), 4,,:''. :.,
•4 .%... .&M. ,' , 9. 1 Js,,,,,.
tfr ;
I.„.,---`-' -"' ,-..-'61,171,4 -'.,.,t,''''''',,^:. =1,.,'1.;,AN,,,,..4".4;.kfl'''' ''''''':'1•''''1k4 l''f,' '''':''''' 1'':' 4 li l'''‘J ' 4iiit '',' 1,1 , '....4t.} (` , ) ,,i.,-,-,_gi,4,.1., - t'7, ilr:7 '1' Itifl•tir
'.,,,-..:,,,6,,..74,,,,:.,,,it.:,;,40,4,-,0,19,0 .ir,:i.wh?ily,-,p,,..,5 . ,i,r4,- ..e_'2' `,.,4,trp,,,,A-',.:..:,;-7,-'_-. e,",, '
21 it
,L',?' .1:,,-", -, ',11:,.'lle"1
0
--- -•-•,.,.-,-,,,e- ,---,4,:f.w.o#44,.-t-irerA-/-1,;-',,..14,41 „,,,,,r,irmokip •fj,..:,,,;-_,,,tilf 01,*.wel 7,p';‘,,) -:"••14.1k, .4',,4 -.-2,r'.-,,,i-p---1 -. . , '''4" . ' ' '. 70-,'N'.
A..°,— ' . --'''''' 'IX' '0,/,''.iO4"-;74-7'.44-1. i'-'''4',Ih4,/-'11'''IrlAit'r,'•'•..-',,,,31...i.),' ,','",,,.1'r47:44:1.160,AQ-,?,' 4,;-,P.4'--,N-',.,-..:4-~',-,,%*.ilt;T.;,-,A,,,,440.-- - ', , ..,,,,,t, 4.'",,i+1,0 ,r.., '-',' ,1,14t'l-.4• ,,,v-;
../.-- :,...,„Y:"'.:'-'... ..r,-4-T,t, ,,,,,-,41,4,,•016,,,,,T.:411'414r'+',1,rri,,.,'1, '1:ei,:: :>.4.7eig ..`.,`.,"'':t'''''';.:-:',.. Y ";•1•144.44,-- i'..AiNt...nr` ,'A':,:4%' ir 6.. g .'j•,%10, ;,y"-' ' '''06447,NitAlk,.,e ', A.,, „.._'- g.'‘ ..f t,
'-'-rr-7,t'''Y . tr'"--'''.4r, 1,ii,t,l'o',..,'41:,-,,," lAttos.•..1,2.1,,'4..,,'.' .:.4')" 'A'v .1.0, N;.,r,,,,.,,,,,,:„:,, ., '., 4K+ .1-,1, SN,*„;%.,0,...,^ -L,,,,,0„.• ,-, •••,-,• •el - _4.5. '4-, Jeft.".,', " ,,
Y.(.L tt"-'‘ *-'1,ii,': '7441,-Z: 4'''. ,.'..;::.:;', .;`,4., .q.,,‘,r-4,7,-.. ' ..,4 ,1;, ; . r.''`'It...,'7"::'-'''',414;'(t '',,.).-..P4f,...,..4-,:,.
,t,v. ,,..,..,,..J.;+,,,,,, A .: .dpiiir'., -.il. i,,a4,-1,.4 1.:....1!f,".c• .-r. ,1`,. 74''''.. 41.-;' .,'`.:.' '1.-ig: , .V 4:\:' ,.-‘rir''' .4144;4_ -L- -'14.4,1e.:(4`,.'
-y-
J'4"1 A'..r , :`. -.vac..,.-‘4. --
-X''.:.i.z-.-i•-•,',--.4 '4,i.%.7'-''=',:5,'N-T,-,„. '..,..-- ,, ..,i. _
i-B,
'4''•',.,, ,,'''.+11, '4fr V.:1,1M Vi''''t;',,,.,:!'".17! ,q,'"' -
...,''-'6';'1','''.•' ,,-4*Iit":0;,' ', ,.'.,,,%,k1,V,,,L,
'
,,j., . ,,'.4-4,41','""'',,11,',,).. ', .-'T`3. ', ,'6P--?.... `71 r -;•.; v., .11'',-.;l'''',-'4‘,','-4',,,,;.[,,q4. ;3_,„...!7.V.,,',.. - '
--
_ , ,"''''' ' .'.. A•y-.'•'..- '",..-Al;•;',/, '''' ;' •:::''' '' ",...4-4( -_2- -r,r.r.,-.,,, .
, , ..'_,.r., .,.,,-. • r.IC,F••• ",,"-« ' `.‘,4„.:,4- , 4.'-',.,"'-'441- ..! •
- .
"'•'17'.";::IL,- • =t-'',': :''''''','''',.kk 2.?..t."-_-'''' "' • Vi 4-, .11. 1 Lnle.r,
.„./.., ,, ..y. '' .,;.v.0.-.-,-,,.........,•..' -,%-.y.,,,e, , -',, i ..... N't ' J.• A ' ,
. ''. t...,,,,'••.,.1-,k'l .-',,,, '71,',
-, ,-• '-r'e 17,41-'4.-..1,,'--4'.,4^- ' .',. . ,,.„,,, ; ,..... ., .,,,-,f'.', -;-...,'..,t-I.,:.-'.: 1....,,i;'J -.-
-''',. ---'''',`"' -.1„.7.fl`ri,..'',"''''".1,,,,', ' ,!,,:,',:,,',''.,., e':-..',;1,_,1-4'.',,• •Ibi'.7,,I.z1,'.+;3, '..',.r,4_4, -`''',4 i,'?-1../..- ------4 ----------_____:_
.— •.-,4,,f,i,731,-•' ''4,1,),',0. 46.'t A:'-.., Wr''.f.;), k
,)?, ,' ' ,-' •/'t '.. ,
' .r: 1 '' '
,-,,, ..,.., .-1 .L,.. _r'. ,y ...',' •',,,,J,-v. .., ,. .",§tefr,„lA.,,
...:...*
. , r'-''. ' , ,..Ni.'4,_ -).k,..,....z, ,I.,;•,,,e
i -
Photograph 3: Looking North at Area of Future Taxilane

Yr
} f d } y1
., � �+ a,# i ,� 6 fi ,...., �f.. ••;1.7 t..v, "r i ''w 4^i' tir Jr • q iy .J• k d 1 ' :' a ,4�'i ,..'!` 'G,'t a1'
4-• .E7r, !Y A , k rx A .V 4 Shn. 0.. § 3 1. � *' F P to 1F�Y 1 �". .. •.
s = ' c ' • r ?� 4: y� �" a Y ` 4` Mks 4 :.
�. Fdr y
sq , � .I," t ;IL ti if' r a ,pI�fT-cr A '1st
� I K• ' _�",
ti F (le; i 7 .�
w r i !
� '''Ir ,i,....--,,,...:,i,H.„.,,,-,.....: -• - ,:,..,-.-2, - - --2-,,-,.: , ___,----1--- . • ____ z:..... __—....iipuipm
� • 1 ,may
rc
iIt ,"'
Photograph 4: Looking West at Area of Future Taxilane

Appendix B
Agency Coordination

STATh
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
ROY COOPER MACHELLE SANDERS
} GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 3, 2019
Mr. Edward Smail
Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
do Michael Baker International
4401 Belle Oaks Drive
North Charleston, South Carolina 29405
Re: SCH File # 20-E-0000-0093; Proposed project is for the development of an area to
the south of the existing terminal area including site preparation for box hangars,
improvement of the current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar
taxilanes to a new end-around taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
Dear Mr. Smail:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been submitted to the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. According to
G.S. 113A-10, when a state agency is required to prepare an environmental document under the
provisions of federal law, the environmental document meets the provisions of the State
Environmental Policy Act. Attached to this letter for your consideration are comments made by
the agencies in the review of this document.
If any further environmental review documents are prepared for this project, they should be
forwarded to this office for intergovernmental review.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Cryst Best
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region J
Mailing Address: Telephone:[phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Fax:[phone] 116 WEST JONES STREET
1301 MAIL SERVICE CENTER COURIER#51-01-00 RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH,NC 27699-1301 Email:[e-mail]
Website:www.ncadmin.nc.Rov

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROUNA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.RAGAN
Seerenny
JAMIE RAGAN
Pireaor
MEMORANDUM
To: Crystal Best
State Clearinghouse Coordinator
Department of Administration
From: Lyn Hardison
Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
Environmental Assistance and Project Review Coordinator
Washington Regional Office
RE: 20-0093
Scoping-Proposed project is for the development of an area
to the south of the existing terminal area including site
preparation for box hangars, improvements of the current
taxi-lanes, and the connection of the existing hangars taxi-
lanes to a new end-around-taxi-lane at the Raleigh Executive
Jetport.
Lee County
Date: December 2, 2019
The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the proposal for the referenced project. Based
on the information provided, several of our agencies have identified permits that may be required and
offered some valuable guidance. The comments are attached for the applicant's review. The
comments are attached for the applicant's review.
The Department agencies will continue to be available to assist the applicant through any
environmental review or permitting processes.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachments
414
North Cirolinzi Department of Environmcnta1 Quality Division of Environtnental Assistance and Costumer Service
217 West Jones Street 11639 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Cal Om 27699-1639
877.623.6748

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director- Environmental Quality
November 18,2019
MEMORANDUM
To: State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
From: April Norton, Division of Water Resources,Transportation Permitting Branch
Subject: Comments for the proposed improvements to the Raleigh Executive Jetport,consisting of the development
of an area to the south of the existing terminal area; located in Lee County, approximately seven miles
northeast of the Town of Sanford.
The Division of Water Resources received a request for comments dated October 28,2019 for the subject project.
Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for impacts to streams in the project area. More specifically,
potential impacts to:
Table 1. Potential stream impacts within the vicinity of the project study area:
Stream Name River Basin/ Stream Classifications Stream Index Number
Sub-Basin
Copper Mine Creek Cape Fear/CPF07 WS-IV 18-4-7-1
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of additional streams and/or
jurisdictional wetlands in the area. If any jurisdictional areas are identified,the Division of Water Resources
requests that the following environmental issues for the proposed project are considered:
General Project Comments:
1. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required by 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental
documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
2. Environmental impact statement alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to streams
and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs that allow for treatment of
the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Department of Transportation Stornnvater Best Management Practices Tool box manual, such as
grassed swales,buffer areas,preformed scour holes,retention basins,etc.
3. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification,
the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of
impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In accordance with the Environmental
Management Commission's Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0506[hj),mitigation will be required for impacts of greater
than 1 acre to wetlands. If mitigation is required,the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate
�"� North Car'ohno Department of Envlr o mental Quality Divisfon of Water Resources
•i�' 512 Neil h S3€ishury Street i617 Moil Sc r vice Center _Raleigh,Nori h Corofna 7.7699 1611
ur i ;;hi'e"1 i; .a.cam n� "'" 919 707,9000

lost functions and values. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services may be available for assistance with
wetland mitigation.
4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0506[hl),mitigation
will be required for impacts of greater than 300 linear feet to any perennial stream. If mitigation is required,
the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services may be available for assistance with stream mitigation.
5. Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, shall continue to include an
itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding mapping.
6. The NCDWR is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. The
NCDOT shall address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic
environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
7. An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project is required. The type
and detail of analysis shall conform to the NC Division of Water Resource Policy on the assessment of
secondary and cumulative impacts dated April 10,2004.
8. The NCDOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill, excavation
and clearing,and rip rap to jurisdictional wetlands,streams,and riparian buffers need to be included in the final
impact calculations. These impacts,in addition to any construction impacts,temporary or otherwise,also need
to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification Application.
9. Where streams must be crossed,the NCDWR prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However,we realize
that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that culverts should be
countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover,in areas where high
quality wetlands or streams are impacted,a bridge may prove preferable. When applicable,the NCDOT should
not install the bridge bents in the creek,to the maximum extent practicable.
10. Whenever possible,the NCDWR prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work
within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges shall allow for human and wildlife passage beneath the structure.
Fish passage and navigation by canoeists and boaters shall not be blocked. Bridge supports(bents)should not
be placed in the stream when possible.
1. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across the bridge
and pre-treated through site-appropriate means(grassed swales,pre-formed scour holes,vegetated buffers,etc.)
before entering the stream. To meet the requirements of NCDOT's NPDES permit NCS0000250,please refer
to the most recent version of the North Carolina Department of Transportation Stormwater Best Management
Practices Toolbox manual for approved measures.
12. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or streams.
13. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could precipitate
compensatory mitigation.
14. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for
stormwater management. More specifically,stormwater shall not be permitted to discharge directly into streams
or surface waters.
15. Based on the information presented in the document,the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and streams may
require an application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification. Please be
advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that
water quality standards are met,and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require
the submittal of a formal application by the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWR. Please be

aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream
impacts to the maximum extent practical,the development of an acceptable stormwater management plan,and
the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate.
16. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between
curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged
to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills.
17. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed,the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and
elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and appropriate native woody species
shall be planted. When using temporary structures,the area shall be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area
with chain saws,mowers,bush-hogs,or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact
allows the area to re-vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
18. Unless otherwise authorized,placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams shall be placed
below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches,to allow low flow passage of
water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion
control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or
streambeds or banks,adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above structures.The applicant is required
to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being maintained if requested in writing by the NCDWR. If this
condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting features encountered during construction,please
contact the NCDWR for guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification
will be required.
19. If multiple pipes or barrels are required,they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as closely
as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation,floodplain benches,and/or sills may be required
where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet or
outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased
maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
20. If foundation test borings are necessary;it shall be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is approved under
General 401 Certification Number 3883/Nationwide Permit No.6 for Survey Activities.
21. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient enough to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
22. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures from
the most current version of the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags,
rock berms,cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
23. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of Wetland
Significance(NC-CREWS)maps and soil survey maps are useful tools,their inherent inaccuracies require that
qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit approval.
24. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels to minimize sedimentation
and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This equipment shall be inspected daily
and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels,lubricants,hydraulic fluids, or
other toxic materials.
25. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes
aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed,sized and installed.
26. Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Riparian
vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing season
following completion of construction.

Thank you for requesting our input. The issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate
measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met,and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If
you have any questions or require additional information,please contact April Norton at april.nortonncdenr.gov.

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor- Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
MICHAEi.SCOTT
Director MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Scott, Division Director through Sharon Brinkley
FROM: Drew Hammonds, Eastern District Supervisor- Solid Waste Section
DATE: November 15, 2019
SUBJECT: Review: SW 20-0093 - Lee County(Scoping—Sanford-Lee County Regional
Airport Authority - Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal are including site preparation for box hangers, improvement of the current taxi-lane and
the connection of the existing hanger tax-lanes to new end-around-taxi-lane ant the Raleigh
Executive Jetport)
The Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section)has reviewed the scoping
document submitted for the subject project in Lee County, NC. Based on the information
provided in these documents, the Section at this time does not see an adverse impact on the
surrounding communities and likewise knows of no situations in the communities, which would
affect this project.
As always, for any planned or proposed projects, it is recommended that during any land
clearing, demolition and construction, the Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority
and/or its contractors would make every feasible effort to minimize the generation of waste, to
recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in
the development of this project where suitable. Any waste generated by and of the projects
that cannot be beneficially reused or recycled must be disposed of at a solid waste
management facility permitted by the Division. The Section strongly recommends that the
Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority require all contractors to provide proof of
proper disposal for all generated waste to permitted facilities.
Permitted solid waste management facilities are listed on the Division of Waste Management,
Solid Waste Section portal site at: https:!/dcq.oc.cov/about)divisionstwaste-managcmcntAvaste-
management-rules-data!solid-waste-management-amrual-reports/spalid-waste-permfitted-laciIity-
list
Questions regarding solid waste management for this project should be directed to Mr. Drew
Hammonds, Eastern District Supervisor, Solid Waste Section, at(910)433-3349.
3 5. I 1
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Waste Management
Fayetteville Regional Office 225 Green Stied,Suite i 14 Fayetteville.Nerit Carolina 28301
910 433.3300

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: RRO/FRO
Project Number: 20-0093 Due Date:11/27/2019
County: Lee
After review of this project it has been determined that the DEQ permit(s)and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this
project to comply with North Carolina Law.Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the
reverse of the form.All applications,information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Time
(statutory time
limit)
Permit to construct&operate wastewater
treatment facilities,non-standard sewer system Application 90 days before begins construction or award of 30 days
❑ extensions&sewer systems that do not construction contracts.On-site inspection may be required.Post- (90 days)
discharge into state surface waters, application technical conference usual.
Permit to construct&operate,sewer
extensions involving gravity sewers,pump Fast-Track Permitting program consists of the submittal of an
30 days
❑ stations and force mains discharging into a application and an engineer's certification that the project meets all (N/A)
sewer collection applicable State rules and Division Minimum Design Criteria.
system
NPDES-permit to discharge into surface water Application 180 days before begins activity.On-site inspection.Pre-
p and/or permit to operate and construct application conference usual.Additionally,obtain permit to construct 90-120 days
wastewater facilities discharging into state wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES.Reply time,30 days (N/A)
surface waters. after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later.
30 days
❑ Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary. (N/A)
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the
installation of a groundwater monitoring well located on property not 7 days
❑ Well Construction Permit owned by the applicant,and for a large capacity 000,000 gallons per {15 days)
day)water supply well.
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property
owner.On-site inspection.Pre-application conference usual.Filling may SS days
❑ Dredge and Fill Permit require Easement to Fill from N.C.Department of Administration and (90 days)
Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct&operate Air Pollution Application must be submitted and permit received prior to
construction and operation of the source. if a permit is required
❑ Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources as in an area without local zoning,then there are additional 90 days
per 15 A NCAC(20.O100 thru 2Q.0300) requirements and timelines(20.0113}.
Any open burning associated with subject
Elproposal must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC N/A 60 days
2D.1900 {90 days)
Demolition or renovations of structures Please Note-The Health Hazards Control Unit(HHCU)of the N.C.
containing asbestos material must be in Department of Health and Human Services, must be notified of plans to
® compliance with 15 A NCAC 20.1110(a)(1) demolish a building,including residences for commercial or industrial 60 days
which requires notification and removal prior to expansion,even if no asbestos is present in the building. (90 days)
demolition.Contact Asbestos Control Group
919-707-5950
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity.An erosion&
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres are to be disturbed.Plan must be filed with and approved
❑ by applicable Regional Office(Land Quality Section)at least 30 days before beginning activity. A NPDES Construction 20 days
Stormwater permit(NCG010000)is also usually issued should design features meet minimum requirements. A fee of$65 (30 days)
for the first acre or any part of an acre. An express review option is available with additional fees.
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOT's approved program. Particular
❑ attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable (30 days)
Stormwater conveyances and outlets.
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with Local Government's approved program.
❑ Particular attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well
Based on Local
as stable Stormwater conveyances and outlets. Program
❑ Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0126-NPDES Stormwater Program which regulates three types of activities:Industrial, 30-60 days
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System&Construction activities that disturb zl acre. (90 days)
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000-State Stormwater Permitting Programs regulate site development and post- 45 days
❑ construction stormwater runoff control. Areas subject to these permit programs include all 20 coastal counties,and (90 days)
various other counties and watersheds throughout the state.
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 1 of 3
January 2017/ibh

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: RRO/FRO
Project Number: 20-0093 Due Date:11/27/2019
County: Lee
Normal Process
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Time
(statutory time
limit)
On-site inspection usual.Surety bond filed with DEQ Bond amount
ID Mining Permit
varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land.Affected 30 days
area greater than one acre must be permitted.The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued.
If permit required,application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N.C.qualified engineer to:prepare plans,inspect
construction,and certify construction is according to DEQ approved
❑ Dam Safety Permit plans.May also require a permit under mosquito control program.And 30 days
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers.An inspection of site is necessary (60 days)
to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of$200.00 must
accompany the application.An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion.
❑ Oil Refining Facilities N/A 90-120 days
(N/A)
File surety bond of$5,000 with DEQ running to State of NC conditional 10 days
❑ Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well that any well opened by drill operator shall,upon abandonment,be N/A
plugged according to DEQ rules and regulations.
❑ Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with DEQ at least 10 days prior to issue of permit. 10 days
Application by letter.No standard application form. N/A
Application fee based on structure size is charged.Must include
❑ State Lakes Construction Permit descriptions&drawings of structure&proof of ownership of riparian 15-20 days
property N/A
Compliance with the T15A 02H.0500 Certifications are required
® 401 Water Quality Certification whenever construction or operation of facilities will result in a 60 days
discharge into navigable water as described in 33 CFR part 323. (130 days)
Compliance with Catawba,Goose Creek,Jordan Lake,Randleman,Tar Pamlico or Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules is required.
® Buffer requirements:httpa/de_q.nc.gov/about/divisions/vaer_resources/waterrresources-permits/wastewater_
hranch/401-wetlands-buffer-permits/401-riparian-buffer-protection-program
Nutrient Offset:Loading requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River basins,and in the
Jordan and Falls Lake watersheds,as part of the nutrient-management strategies in these areas. DWR nutrient offset
❑ information:
http://cleq.nc.aav/about divisions/water-resources/planningfnonpoint-source-management nutrient-offset-information
❑ CAMA Permit for MAJOR development $250.00-$475.00 fee must accompany application 75 days
(150 days}
❑ CAMA Permit for MINOR development $100.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
® Abandonment of any wells,if required must be in accordance with Title 15A.Subchapter 2C.0100.
• Notification of the proper regional office is requested if"orphan"underground storage tanks(USTS}are discovered during
any excavation operation.
Plans and specifications for the construction,expansion,or alteration of a public water system must be approved by the
Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction
® as per 15A NCAC 18C.0300 et.seq.,Plans and specifications should be submitted to 1634 Mail Service Center,Raleigh, 30 days
North Carolina 27699-1634. All public water supply systems must comply with state and federal drinking water monitoring
requirements.For more information,contact the Public Water Supply Section,[phone].
If existing water lines will be relocated during the construction,plans for the water line relocation must be submitted to
® the Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699- 30 days
1634.For more information,contact the Public Water Supply Section,(919}707-9100.
Plans and specifications for the construction,expansion,or alteration of the water system must be approved
❑ through the delegated plan approval authority. Please contact them at for further information.
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 2 of 3
January 2017/Ibh

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: RRO/FRO
Project Number: 20-0093 Due Date:11/27/2019
County: Lee
Other Comments(attach additional pages as necessary,being certain to comment authority)
Division Initials No Comments Date
comment Review
DAQ MRF ❑ See checked boxes above. 11/25/19
DWR-WQROS JB& ❑ See checked boxes above.& 11/21/19
(Aquifer&Surface) / /
DWR-PWS SG ❑ See checked boxes above. 11/6/19
DEMLR(LQ&SW) ❑ / /
DWM—UST KEC ❑ The UST Section,Fayetteville Regional Office,does not have record of an 11/6/19
identified release of petroleum in the area of concern for this docket
number,nor are there any records of registered USTs
Other Comments ❑ / /
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
❑ Asheville Regional Office ® Fayetteville Regional Office ❑ Mooresville Regional Office
2090 U.S.70 Highway 225 Green Street,Suite 714, 610 East Center Avenue,Suite 301,
Swannanoa,NC 28778-8211 Fayetteville,NC 28301-5043 Mooresville,NC 28115
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
® Raleigh Regional Office ❑ Washington Regional Office El Wilmington Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, 943 Washington Square Mall, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.,
Raleigh,NC 27609 Washington,NC 27889 Wilmington,NC 28405
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
El Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300,
Winston-Salem,NC 27105
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 3 of 3
January 2017/Ibh

w
d '.
ROY COOPER NOR 1 R CAROL.NA
6f.v,m4. &Alar'mmer/totQu Wy
MICI MAEL S.RtGAN
son...wry
h1EICHAEL SCOTT
CJII t%to,
Date: November 26, 2019
To: Michael Scott, Director
Division of Waste Management
Through: Janet Macdonald
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch —Special Projects Unit
From: Bonnie S. Ware
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Subject: NEPA Project #20-0093, Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority, Lee County, North
Carolina
The Superfund Section has reviewed the proximity of sites under its jurisdiction to the Sanford-Lee County
Regional Airport Authority project. Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the
existing terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the current taxi-lane, and
the connection of the existing hangar taxi-lanes to a new end-around — taxi-lane at the Raleigh Executive
Jetport.
No sites were identified within one mile of the project as shown on the attached report.
Please contact Janet Macdonald at 919.707.8349 if you have any questions.
Nc,1h(.,,,,,,I.4,0,oat tnentodl'ri49rrtrmmNai.iQiiality I [7i=,i,heap€Waste%in,ayeoicrit
.. iNA4e[fr. q%Sri eek .`16,tOr A Ne.f5i1.r f,amro It;ile 4I).Nor th(,IenP,,,,,"Nx4)910.16
4..11.4

N
.--.
...—
A ;...
.'
..
...
, -
'...'-'
., .. .
. .
.... ...
.. .
,..
/7'...'
..,
=..
/ L
1
11
.. )
). i
..- .'
',...
.
,.
';..„`...,
\\N,,,,,,,
'k,-------..., _ _,.--------
-',,-,.., -- ---
,
...,
'""t,,
...
.-'%,.,.
,...,,,
0 , ,,,„
., s..,,„
0-
a) a) ,:. ,,
,,,,,,
ce E
i= .`y., , ,',....
.
C 12 ,
...-
..
a) 0
7_1 co
...:.. ..,„.
-
•,_— c -,„
....1' CI
S ..,
ic- -
,...< c
— a)
..-
cn ,
LL ....-....
co
LIJ 0
-4-
Zftftft. CD ..
I_L
t—
...' '
th CO 9.
a) N
IJJ 4.. c,-; 0.)
U) c co —
ic- - CNI
O N up
cr) /
ii-5 ® 111 2 8
up
N
I—

E 1 [[E
•
.E
E I
•
•
•
I i
a Q Q Q l a
�..Z._..._Z.. z z z
•
•
I � i
I '
2 Ii
A I
•
•
•
•
•
•
3 I
! I � i
a ' a g g g
zz z z z
•
� I �
a
0 �
I {
E [
0 : 0 O i 0 I 0
E I
s
3
I
uj 3
€ m ° V)
Z N C N V E
(I) tC 0 J O)
0
' `m o
E 0.
d 2 7 "17
_ N
OI O1 7 I C
q d y m Q
N

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: LEE F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MR JOSEPH HUDYNCIA
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
1001 MSC - AGRICULTURE BLDG
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a new
end-around - taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. ?lease review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS R VIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: vl NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: iV)v DATE:
This application
,r.
Did/pid No --have a CREP conservation easement on the subject property
Did/ id Not; have a Swine buyout easement on the subject property
Did/ id not have ADFP easement on the subject property
Did Did N have a plant conservation easement on the subject property
Did/ d Not- have a plant conservation priority site on the subject property
Did I id Not have a VAD (Voluntary,Ag I7i on the subject property area

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW S 1 4 { 8.l f G
COUNTY: LEE F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MS JEANNE STONE
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE PLANNING - MSC 41554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE leanspU►talion Planning
Division
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM NOV F 2019
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a new
end-around - taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REV W THE FOL WING IS SUBMITTED: 4'NO COMMENT l l COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: • r DATE: l —/g--/9

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: LEE
F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-00OG-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/201.9
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MR RODNEY BUTLER
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRM
1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RAT,ErGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRC;NnNIAT, QUALITY
DEPT OE NATURAT, i CLU,TURAL RESOURCE
I)EPI OF TRANSPORTATION
DNOR ATURTI.I„ HERITA.:3E PROGRA
DPS DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE C COG-
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Seeping
DEC: Pr000:ied project is for the development of an area to the sooth of the existing
tormir.al area including site ptepartien for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxIlane, and the connection of the exi .in9 hangar taxilanes to a new
end-arcdnd - taxi lone at the Ralei,.Th ExeciAlve JeLport.
The attact.ed project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intcr,?overnmental review. Please review and submit yot.r repons by the above
indicated. datE to 130 Mail Servj..ce Center, Raleic4h NC 27699-130i.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (91.97-2423.
AS A RESULT OF THIS ,ZIEW THE vOLLOWING IS ITTED: NO COMENT COMMENTS ATTACFEb
SIGNED BY: tolv15-1!"- e DATE:

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: LEE F03:AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000--0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY Received: 11/12/2019
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE. State Historic Preservation Office
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 -- ARCHIVES BUILDIING ER 19-4958
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE [.)lit -- [1/20/19
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OE NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION A- gD,NCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DCS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 1 V I
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Autt Due
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
H_ N
DISC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a now
end-around - taxiiane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review Lime is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: 112 NO COMMENT ! 1 COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: '? i1 t i DATE: t L '
NOV 1 3 1019

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW LOW 4 2019
COUNTY: LEE F03: AIRPORTS STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0093
DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/2019
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/27/2019
REVIEW CLOSED: 12/02/2019
MS CINDY WILLIAMS
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
4218 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG ,
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Auth
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the development of an area to the south of the existing
terminal area including site preparation for box hangars, improvement of the
current taxilane, and the connection of the existing hangar taxilanes to a new
end-around - taxilane at the Raleigh Executive Jetport.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: ✓NO COMMENT n COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: 214 /SMCA---
DATE: 1lr /0

Smail, Ed
From: Williams, Andrew E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 8:20 AM
To: Smail, Ed
Cc: Lastinger,James C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: Raleigh Executive Airport - Permitting Question (Lee County)
Ed,
I hope you are doing well, too.
Below are my thoughts on each of your questions.
1.The JD area does not necessarily need to be expanded if you all are certain there aren't any aquatic resources in those
areas proposed for development.
2. We have not finalized the JD for the area south of the airport yet. I conducted the site visit on January 29, 2020. So if
you wanted to add the new areas, and provide data sheets, etc. we could incorporate it into the final JD (the Corps
Action ID is: SAW-2019-02322) 3. We may be able to modify the existing IP to incorporate these proposed impacts.
Additionally, I no longer am the Corps PM for Lee County.The Corps PM is now James Lastinger. I have copied him with
this email,too so you will have his contact information.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or if I can provide any further assistance.Thanks.
Andrew Williams
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
919-554-4884 ext. 26
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
https://namll.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcorpsmapu.usace.army.mil%2Fcm_apex%2Ff%3F
p%3D136%3A4%3A0&amp;data=02%7C01%7CESmail%40mbakerintl.com%7C8febe3ff3fbe4dc3140608d7c107f08e%7C4
elee3db4df64142b7b9bec15f171ca4%7C0%7C0%7C637190112178955773&amp;sdata=EUEp9oLwl BOxXzHIbh4T4lTnPZ
yZpLDDl3deTvg1Jgk%3D&amp;reserved=0
to complete the survey online.
Original Message
From: Smail, Ed <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 3:16 PM
To: Williams, Andrew E CIV USARMY CESAW(USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Raleigh Executive Airport- Permitting Question (Lee County)
Good Afternoon Andy,
i

Hope you are doing well. I had some questions in regard to a new project we are looking at for the Raleigh Executive
Airport. The Airport is looking at expanding the hangar area south of the existing terminal (see attached). Based on a
wetland delineation that occurred for an additional project to the south (also attached), there is a wetland system
(Wetland W3)that starts at the outfall of the stormwater pond. Looking at the current delineation,the ditch draining
this entire area to the pond was not determined a WOUS where it ties into the pond (above Wetland W3 -downslope of
the hangar area development project). As part of the this development, improvement to the pond is required. More
specifically, a rip-rap spill way is going to be required. It appears that some armoring will be required in the wetland
system at the pond outfall. If we determine that wetland impacts would occur:
1. Will the JD area need to be expanded to include the entire project area for the hangar area?
2. If so, since the existing delineation is related to a different project (for planning purposes),would a separate JD
need to be issued to just cover the hangar area project, or could one JD cover both projects?
3. Since we had a recent IP at the Airport (SAW 2009-01114), would any wetland impact (regardless of size) likely
trigger an IP?
Thank you for your time, and I would be glad to discuss if you need any additional clarification.
Ed Smail I Project Manager- Environmental
4425 Belle Oaks Drive I Charleston, SC 29405 I [0] 843-745-8808 I [M] [phone]
[e-mail] I Blockedwww.mbakerintl.com <Blockedhttps://www.mbakerintl.com>
<Blockedhttps://mbakerintl.com/media/5024/s21_f 061907_icons.jpg>
<Blockedhttps://mbakerintl.com/media/5025/s21_f 061907_logo.jpg>
2

Appendix C
Waters of the U.S. Coordination

\ \ \. 'ry{d.f ... /'.;` , x}}''=' ,- r-;. ;v- � '. -- / 1 f , / I 1 \ I \ /// / /,/I 'f � + •} ! 1 1 fifer, t�
\ \ \ \ { ; \ < 1 , // a r ,_ /
�i',,.+K Y .\•' ' „ Jt' .-qj/':..:( /:G \ \ . \ \ \ 1 / \ / / / / / / / / ' .i / 1 , !�
\ \ •.:85 s ,• \ '. "J .F' \. \ \ \ \\( 1 \ / •/ / / ♦ / , / / }' / I / .y ar
`\ `\ ,� . ,} . \\ \ , \\\ . , / , , ,, , , ,- , , Le end
\\ \\ ' i \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ / / / / / / / f l / / r
/ \ �� / / A \ \ ` \ \\`\ \`\ �// / / , / / I SV l / � r"` J. ,' _ _ . ! .:
`` ' '/ I Evaluation Area
4. �a� Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
' - -i / ' , .y. • • co�� Potentially Jurisdictional Intermittent Stream
' _ - \ r \`-'' �, /_ 1 � j Potentially Jurisdictional Pond
` / �1I �� Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
I ;/ ;''Y_ - \\\\\`\ \ \`\ \`\\`\ j i t 1 fir//1 :r t. > I \ '`��i'*. Non-Jurisdictional Stormwater BMP
I .1 / / \ , . \ \ . \ , ,,, ,-_ __ >. Culvert
i i \\\ \ \\ \\ ;; =, 2 Lee County Contours
-� � 230A TT 230B \ ` `;;= *- - '�= '� \
/ \
+ 1
j/ ♦'—_� I`'\\ `; 11 \\\\ II i % I \ is p �/' - f d3._` 1`�
it
f I 1\ \I I 1 \ \\ \\\ l / / % // T+ , , I y .: M1 ';i -da= _,r.r•` �y�l
\\ (\\ 1 1`--/ // \` \`\, \`\ l / / / j !� - /����;�� f I , j
_ �� Confirmed b And Williams of /
`; `\\ \\—i/ / ■ ■ „ f •• +**.,A , / i,.WII '. \.if. a f fi r' �. /
\\ \\ I _ -��- the USACE on 01 /29/2020. -i '
\ _/ s
\ \ \. J a._s / .. _\ + // l 1 1 \_ \\1F:1 • I \- D P5 . ,_� w } _ c _ \` + n .f" * .
1 1 239A & 237B TT S02 '� / y \___ \ ,�\11 / " " /
I \ \ I \ -__ /I\\\\r'. . {' ; " - '- ,/
\ I 1 I % /, `\ \\ j/ �' / 1 / J I I \ `� �`♦ `I 1 `, `\�;�\�_------- Y �''x ���--I' ( �\
\ / — `\ % ' S 0 2 Start \ \ ` �\ ` \ \\ \ \\— '' ..r \' \ \` \ ` ` \\` \
\\`— '''/ ♦--.. /, �'` f ,/ /', 'r \\ ;_ \\ -�Ir:'s\ \\ `\ `\ _ /{ \�\\ \\`\ \`\\\`\\`\\\\\\ /r '�''.;a't'-' - —h r _, - \\ \\ \\ \ `
- / I \ I / / 1 1 ?\\_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` ` \ \\ - \\ \\— /
\\`------ ' '`\I I /% % I ��' / /^ `1 \ `\.. `\, `\ ` \ \ \ \ ` ` \\ \. \ \— : :h_ -- // ,/ / /
1 I \ \ \ i '
\ I I 1 1 \ // / \ \ \\- \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ ` \ «':tip I,,,,4 I - 1 ( �� ��/ i
\\ / f;1/ 1. 1 ' l 1 % /' \ •.---\ \--\- 1 1 / 1 I \ \ `\\ s \ \ `\\ \ ,�,�,� , I 1 \ l i
--\\ \ I I i r 1 `\ \ I I / .. `\\ -\ 1 .I I 1. 1 \`\ \`\ \ 9 I` \\` \` `\ \`` �,�,� ' 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ i
\ \ , t 1, / I \\ 1 / / . r—^—�- — \ 1 r \ .' \ \ \ \ 1 I 0 \ \ ! 1 f \ ` \ /
\ / I // // .. / 1 I\ \ 1 I / / I / s \ 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ '\ \ ` \ ,: ��,�, I \ \ \ .. 1 \ \
1 1 1 \ II/ / / /1 / 1 \ \ \\ 1\ 1 r I 1 / 1. 1 / ±� 1 \ \ , \\ \ \1 l .�\ `\ `G / 1 `\ \ `\ \ \ \ \
I I 1 \ 11// /% I I 1 \ \ . \ 1' 1 1 ,l 6 / / \----_\\ ' \ \\\ \\\; • �,,,,
I \ \ f / ' 1 \ \ ; , / ` ` ` \ ` ` . 365 & 366 TT Culvert \\ `\ \\. `\ I I \_--
\ \ III�u, r♦ 1 \ \ \ \ I \ :. : \ \ n ; wg ,,,••5, r , ` \. ` —___ \\\\ \`\. `\ `�': \ \ \ \ I , 1 I
F (_ 600 ft.) - .
J,,,,r// , , ; 111. \\ :\\ ,\ C (_ 2875 ft.) -- \ \\ \\\ \\ r , ; x + .---
/////// 1 r 1 ► 1 \ "' \: \ ?�:' \ \ \ ` \` 41 1 1 .\\ \ `t 1 t 1 I ( 1 __
` /1/irr/t '♦'� 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` f _ \ a\ \ \.\\ \` \` \ I r \ \
` //. ♦ / / 1 1 \ 1 1. \\ t. r' -\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ `\\\\ Ot /1 I 1.II. .. \ \ 1 / / / / 1
//,,, y., I 1 1 1 \ \\ \_- -\ I 1 I _ ___ --\ \ _ 1 1 \ I ; o �i Off ; R Streams become impounded , I I , , , k, , /
1 // // /-- \ \ \ v'n 1 1 _--_ - \ ' , 4 r 1 I \` • III I \ 1 I 1 1 \ I
1 \ \-- \ 1 j \ \ ♦ 1- 1 1 1 1 I I 1 \ I II '�� I I
®/ __ I I \ \ \ \ \ .• I / f \ \ aWlo '/ I / / 1 1 1 It I I \
%%o/. %// 1 1 1 \ \ \\ \\ — — \\\ \\ \r :1 / / I / % —.\ \ /// I I \ \\ '1. w. Au-K.W. . 1111 Il I, ' ; \ \\ 1 I 1 1 ; I\ —_-- / /
/// / .\ \ — \ \. I I /j/ \ \ A , Ill, \ 1 1
///�/'r� //// I I 1 `\ \`\ `\ --_�— I 1 ( r I 1 1 ♦��\ 1 I / / / I \ 1 1 ,r / 1 LR ,\ \\\ _ \ / /
\ _ \` \\ S 01 Start 1 1 1 _. \ \ ` \\ ` __ -`\ I / /
V / / / . - - 1 I I / I / \ I / I \ \ 1 111� \ \ \ \ - \
I// I /i \ I \ `\ \\ ` 1 , / / , 1 \ 1 1 1 \ I \ \ \ \ \ I
y// I(I1/ \ \ \\ \\-- \\ \\ `\, \ 1 l- / 1 3, / / , _ 1 \ I I / \ I\ \\ `\\\\ \ \\ \\,. 1 II Il:f \ \\ \ \ `\\ -O \` \\ 1 ( 1
/ I \ \ \ \ 1 1 ! / / / I 1 1 \
r \. \ \ \ , / • • / I \ I , , �� -.. \ \. 430B TT 430A , ` \ . \
/, //41\ 1 1 ` \ 1 / / / I / / .. / / / / ' \ \ \\� / 11 1 / j // / '/ / / \\\ \\`\ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ `\ \\-- \ \ \ I \ \
/ // / / / i/' / / / / I 1 I I I 1 _ --%7% I 1 1 l \ --- 1 \ \ \ \\1. \\ \ ` \ \ • .' t\ `\ \\ \\ \` `` \\ \l
%/i/ 1 f i i i/ /'' ' / % ! f 1 1 1. _ , / I 1 l\ ' `\:,. \\ \ \ \ I I. r / ' \ .1 , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
/// / 1 I / ♦ / ♦ , / / / \ \ \ I I \ \ \ \\ \ \ , v. \ . \ \\\ \\L \ `\ ` \ 1 1 _ / \ \ \ , \ \ .`\ `\ \ I I I ;
/ I. I 1 1 I 1 \ '\, \ \ \ 1 1 •' 1 \ \ ` , \ \ , \\\ \\\\\ ` 1 1 F / 1 1111 \t / \ \ 1 \ `\ \ \ \ 1 f I I I
/ /1 I I / / / / / > I / ► \ "\ \ \ 1 ♦ \ 1 ,\\ \ \ 1 1 \ I \ \ \ 1 I 1
/ , \a I I I / / / / / I I / l 1 \ \ \ \ , , I \ \ \ I I , .\ \ . \ \ , j 1 ' ,/ 1111 I.,.
/ / I I.1 I I l I ( ( \ I . \__ \. ? \ ! / 1 ) \ 1 .111\ `; \` ---_/ \ \` `\ \\ \ 1 1 I I I
I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ , I / / \ 1 1•.• 1
- I I \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \_,/ I I /' \ I I 1/ / 1 \ 1 \\ \ — \ \ I I I
t I 1 I \ 1 \ \ 1 �— ` \ \ \ I / / / /'' I / I 1 \ ' �� I \ \ 1 \ \ 1 I 1 I ( 1
1 I 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / ( ) I 1 ' I .,1 / l ' 1\1 7 / \ \\ J \ \ \ 1 I , 1 \ , 1
'�\ I I I \ `— \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ ` / 1 / r /. .:...—/ � , i i l %,, / l'/ /,/ \ \\ \ \ !., r f.l. $ , \ \ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1' \
1 . 1 1 I 1 \ ----\ \ \ \ \ \\ " +' / . / / / --' ♦ / / , ..y/ // / I \ \ \ , 1' i. ,:. I , \ \ 1 / 1 / I
ti I I I 1 I I I \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ .' - O / l I I / /'' _-- / / / / /' 1 f I , I . \ \' I ., , I / \ �__ 1 I 1 \
\ I I , I I 1 \` \\\\ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ -\� J-. / 1 / / / — / j / / / /1 I / \ `\. \\ \ .r ,€ I % / lF I \\ \\ I I 1 1 1 1 1
:..\ I I I I. \ \ ) 1 1 1 I \ \ :\ \\ -\\_ l / I l / _ / , J I / l \ \ \: ` w _yea';: , �\ / / , I , I
\ 1 1 I ,`-\ \ I /''/'1 , \ \ ` ` `-_ / 1 / i / / ♦ ♦ / / / 1 / 1 1 1 ! t" l s t 4tc"F J \ \ \ / I / l / I
\ 1 1 \�_-\\\--___-'* 1! // '-\ \ \ \\ `\-_ --- _-♦ ` I l', �1- b� ./ / / / / / l l / I 1 1 [ 4 .,t :. : R i,"1 (S +' / \___ �.. \\ -/ 1 / / / / / /
\ . l 1 / . \ \ - --- \ 1 I , , I , , I 1 400 TT BMP y ak \ �.t - ;\\ -\ \ 1 , ; / ;
\ `�\ \`� ---^ // / 1 \ \ \ - -----_-- I 1 / / 1 1 / I I s' :1 .( .. yP [.\ \_ \ \ `-_ / 1 I
\ \ \: 1 1 r I \ ` `\__ / I 1 I I I {;, 1 i { 11r�r ' - \ \ \\ / ♦ / / / / /
\ 1 .4 `\ —� / / I ` \\ _—_ / I , . 1 I l ` is 4 16 \{'. - \/ / / / / /
1 / , l ( \ \\ \ ;-\\ \\ ------- - 331 TT BMP \ 1 I , . , \ , , , , ,, .
1 \-- \ \ \ \ \ I{� I I \' \ I 11 1 f /
.. \\ \ 1 ' 1 \ •„,„„ —`\ ` I. 1 \ \ __---\ \`\ \\\\ \`\_— \ --\ I \\ ' ' ' %h.=: a: ,\`\-S. ,,1 ,I 7ir}� rat., : ' 1 / \ \\__—_ /�./ / 1 1 i 1 I \
i \\ \\ \\ ` \ / r \ '/_ \\ \ \\ .\\\ --- \\ i .: ?r. Te_-_\- \\ \\\s I {{ li Fr ki l"x _—__ , , I I \ 1
/^-\\ \ \ \— —\\ I / / / — '\ ` `\\ _ l ary. -'�: tr 4 „ Sl-1 ?{2 '0: ,1 / I I ( I \ \ \
�/ \ \ \ \ _` / / / — �� \ \\ \\ \.. \ `\ 't,.�. + :t'Yas' ,[R: ! ` !y`.;...'.: �5- W7 1 2 8 a c ' / ` \ \ \
j , I l/ j i j j \ `\ \`\ `--_ `\ \ 1=r }. .is 3 '.._ ;1 \ . ' 1 \
1 / Y t\\C\ \\1\`\ \\ -/ i ` .`\\ `\ \`— \ I \ t # c; x`. 4.. r![� :..'r61A .k<i':..r; l i�-. \ / j \\\ \\ \\ —\—_ —i''l— // \\
1 / \1\ .\ / \_ \ — \ \ 1 ` 4L1. „T rt .I I• '--t.... 4i.s-- • J -111 ' f ` \ \ ___ —/ I
1 `\ 1\\\\ `\\\\\ `\ /-. _♦ /,—'\\ \\ \--- \\ 1 • 1` \ Ix\.,; 1. a3.: . of :` I ; \- _ _ ' l 1 \\ \ \\ I
I \ l\.\ \ \\ \ `\ / �\ \------- `\\\ -\\\ \\ I 1 1 1..'. •- :#',' S` .' '1 I ;\\ \.. �{� ',9i ' - ' r / A / /mot I ( , , \\\ `\ \\ \ -----__'/'/'' /'---- ----'/
/ \ 1 \ `\ — / \ ------- - — `. ` \ \ '�4 y .ham a. +d'. •.dP-,.:, ' M1/°' .0.:. 1 \ --
___ t' '�_t lY: ! I 1. / \
/ \ 1\ ``\ ` \\\ %--- \ _—___ \`- --\ ` \\ \\\ \\ 11:V ' :I 1 �1 Y'_: \ ,. . /tee/. //.j). .:1../: \\ 4 / % \\ \` '—'' / \_ i
_ _ �'' •''. , ma c!' .. ✓. /•' / _ {I' \ ' / \ \-\_ / /' -\ _-1
` ` \ ` ♦ ` \ \ \ .Y\ 19r11'./ i r ` C t\ l c .� ��' `F{ j I j� / / / / \ \ / \`----'
�t 1 1\V f
/ /\ ` \ \\__ ` \\ --� 'wC_ .s.= 1 it ld ¢ 3 : , .l.;� o'aai i/_ / f \ \\ \\ , / / / -�— —\\
I .). rt ��.1 ' ' - - ' 400A TT 400 B \ \ ` \ -
`\ — \ 1 —`\\ \` , ' . 1' 'Yt I% t'} j- I / O ,i/�/' /i' �r' \\ \ \ 1 \ —/'' \ 1 f' —
\1 \ \-- \ `. a \\. \\ �\_ . -� \_-- \ { ,' I' 1'1''I''�� I 1. l \_ I/,/ %r / l \\_- _i ♦ ' � ` 1 I I J \ \ 1 / ------
/ / \\ \ --_- \-\\ \\-\ \ \ \` \ -\ \\\ \ I \I Ll'' ,s, I / I. y ' i i!i \ \ \ 1 \\ - / ' \ / / / l I. / / ' ' I I %
1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ / , 1.' 6' I \ \\ / S 0 3 Start / 1 \ �/ / I
\� \\ \. \\ \ \ \\ \\- \ \ / f I l f, 11 1 / /1'1 1 \\ 1 '\`:\\ �_- / i \. _/' / •. \ 1 \ `\ `\-i' ./! ♦ / I
\ W5 (+ 0 17 ac ) \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ - \ \/ I 1 I 11 I( //�' , \ \ ` \ \ / i 1 I 1 \ /� , / / \ \ \ \ \ —i i / I
Q a__. _ ■ ■ \ \ \ \ \ \\ `\ `\ f I 1 1 I 1/ /l I I \ \ \\ \ \\. // -_ 1 1 I \-, / / % `\ \ \\ \ `------ / / _i y
- \\ `\\``\`\ ``\ ``\ \\ \\ i r l 1I.1/ (I 1 I \\ ' \ `\ `\-\, �.,,_--i//�-/ 1 �' 1 I 1 _i % ' ` \\ ` \\ i - I
\\ \\ `\ Impounded channel !; \\ \ \ _ I ` \ - - ;- - :.,:
\ \ \ \ / /// /// __ \ / I \ \ ` _ -, \ s
1- , _ "\ \ `\ , , ,., ; , I % _ •\ . ;\\ -- ' 240 TT P L 11 ' r \ \ ` \ - ' ' - ' = \
. : •. ``, `\ W4 (± 5■ 1 7 ac■) ; \\\;\_���,`,;, ; , I I ; I ;`\ ``\ -; ; --
Stream weakens along field edge O y ���� ` \\\ ��` ;-
\�=-'' E ( 1925 ft ) DP3 - -- - \``\ \`\,``-`_; ' \ ' - '
- I '- • OHO O 1 I / ./I I 1 \ ` )\ \ ' ('. -`\\ -_. \\ `\ / ) 1-\` //
x J > rt . . "``�'F'm""aY wd 0 J / I I I 1 .{ . :.1 \\ \ \ \_/ 1 \ ' ' /
j • ,. _ - y- _ - - - �� I /� /\ / ----_ -- \\\_Jr'/— i \\ill �!t 1 \ ----/ /
\ _ , /. x� �s-v--, I I \ / \ I\ /
i . . . B (Hughes Creek) (± 1250 ft.) =-\ ,\�_-- . .. :_ 1 '
/.. / I,L,/-\\`��\\\.'`' �" _ ' /' /i/r2=_- -_--_-: \ \\\\\ .•,. /. �/ I , / --_- \-=`______-- \`�\\\ F. \ I 1 -\
\ - 1:1 1 \\\\\\\\ �, s': --'L _x.- mow}_ % '/%/%l% -��\``\;\\\ \ \ \ .j / .- --_- \ \\Y \ ,.. \_. / - ,\\. \+' ,
\ i\ \ / 1 I ., \ `\\l. .''�\ - ,�„_ _ _ - x-___� s-• . .. / / MI //, /'^ \ 4''1/ /,I1 1 1-' y1 \ . l /,/ /i'./' /' __ -- -\\ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ I 1 \ '- . 4' •i\ \�,- /
/ - , \ \ \\\ \-_ _------- _- ----_^� T 'r' �%I/�l j I /�% %//Ir %;:;i.1 / \\ l I'�f`�� /r/ -/� --\\ \\ \\ \\\`\ \\\\\ `\\\ I 1 ----- ----------`�__ 1 /--'�^ J-''
---- --- 4 : ,/: -.i ,i / /�//r 1 /. r./11 I I I /. r` ! -_i \ \ I? . I / I / 1 1 \ / i, `- /' -_-_---- �` / y0--
r.% / �/ / K<<'": ♦ C/ //)/ /'/ /' 1 1 / / l l I l I 1 \ I I \ / / \ \• 1 , //i---- `\_ s
Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US '//• , /P/ �;�1.:.t ._ ' /I •///I / / / ,,_ I , 0 / , , ; l / , , \\ 1 ;__-/ `__-' , \', \ ,,�;rl. --\
// /I' • ,. / 1 /// 1 / / / • \ ' / / / 1 / \ - \ / /� \\ rr / // I ,-�_—_— \'
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only - A ♦ t: - �. i ,I I// / ♦ 1 1 \ -- - \ / ` /, / \
/ l I:. /'7' III/ / ' ♦ /' \ I / / / / / l -.— \ 1 -y/ \ / / / _ —\ / /' / // �. -
S86EC reserves the ri ht to modif this ma based on more fieldwork, r'' / /// ♦' -\ \ ` ` \ \ \ t . \ t O- . -- '1 \ \ _.' ( / /" /// \ \
\ and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped using { \r\ 5 y- .,' �� i /� ,- --\ \ \\ \\\\1 \ �\ \,\ \ \ _/ I -\\\\\ \ __-- I ! . -_ ; I I I 7/1 I I 1 ' ,'- _\ , -\`\�;
topographic maps, air photos and ground truthing. If the site is going -\.a ,._ / /, , / /' ____ \\ \ \\ \\\\ \ • \ \, \ 1 . i ;\\`\_, \\' ,/';^ -`\� i \\\ -- �, i \ i i i i i i 'i' \` `� �\ \
to be disturbed, S&EC s detailed delineation should be a roved and r • '*:~\\ / / I / / / / / / . ''- ` ` \ \ \ \ ` - ` ' J : /h
hh .e. '�4 . / l 1 I / / / / t '' \ \ \ I \ \ \ 1 1 \ 1 1 / .\\ \. -\ \O \\ \\ \ , / �I III// I ,_--\\ \ 1 \\
# / / 1 1 I / / / / \ 1 . 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I / 1 , / �\ \ \\ I , \ \__ -. \ , , I II II , 1 / `\ `\ I 1 I
permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of 1 "+.::• / .. 1 I / ) 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 / / / ` - / / 1 u 11
I a d , I I I I I , 1 1 I I I l l 1 I / I / I\__ ( \\ \ `\_ \ / `\ _\� /' / ( / / // I I 11 ; I I 1 1
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by ( ; ; / ; ; ; 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 I / I / . \ \ `\ `\- \\ / \\ 1 / 7/ I 1 •; i ;I ; 1\
�,I F., l I \ If I \
S&EC, the should retain a NC Re istered Professional Land Surve or to 1 1 1 1 I' I , 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 f 1 1 / , `\_ `\ \ `-_' \ / . . \ / I 1 \ \
Y g Y I 1 I ; ' \ \I I I 1 1 ( I I \\_�``\ \ - ----'---------------'/ --`\ \I 1 I I I , : \\ \ \\\\
locate Sc�EC s flagging. 1 r i , i . \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 I / / _ •/ I 1 \ /' \ I / 1' 1 \ \ \ \
► , / 1 1, I / / \ I 1 I I \ 1 / \ \ / \ _. \\I / 1 \\1 1 1 I \ \ \ .\\
/ 4 . j// ; I I'.`I / / \ 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I \ \\, \ % / ,' —/ I \\ \ • `\__� --- — _ -/.=^\ \II I\ I \\\\ \ 1 I .^\ \ \\ . \\ \
1 I It /. , �.J I I. I , I \ \ 1 1 1 I 1 1 \ a. •/• / / ' . \ \ \ \ \ \11 \\ 1 \, . I \ \ \ \
►, ! / / / / , , ,- I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 \ % / / /.--__ \ \ \ `\ i^^--- _ �. : \ \\\\`. . 1 11\ \ / / \ \ \
/ /. / / i i /i / /- r 1 I l l l I 1 r 1 1 1 \ / / / `� \\\\ `\— _—'' ---^----r _____________ \ \\\`\ I 111\I', \ i / / `�\`\`\
s / , �/ /ii.'/ / i 1 % ,//// 1 / / 1 ( I 1' ---i l I ' \\ \\ \ — , 1 \\' \ \ 1 1, \\ \ \
u / / .- .,,' -✓ /' /// / I .1 [ / \- . \ \ 1 ! I C "t ,.. 9raphl•/ u u tAnaly`1
Raleigh Jetport - South 0 200 400 800
Wetland Sketch Map Project No. Scale: Lee County, NC S& Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
14034.W1 1 = 200'
Post U S A C E site Visit 412 .,11s of Neuse Road,Suite 104,Raleigh.NC 2761 S•Phone:(919)84G-5900*Fax:(919)84b-4AG7
Project Mgr.: 11/08/2019 Prepared by: saodec:aat7t Feet
SB JH

i F - .
% f
i�m� 7 \R41 .ci , , �. oar a` � :.
i.' N..Q >R 7
4
14;...n.-4/ 0 0 \N :Y§ 'A ,
y U
I
/ i
�` � '/ I-. \
il o
',/,/,'y ' - / / \
m
, i
/ / I' I',
/ / , P
i
„' I II II'
/ / '
1 - - it,' , I " !.,1/;L -2 ;
1 °
' i; / - .14f1,
/ ; ,
/ / ! I
i ` // '1'1 I 'I
I \ \ r
7
,, ,,,
„, ,
27/p /,
rc
;: ..
i ... , „ ti _ / A / il
, 1
/J /i /
11
11 , ‘ -- f' /PI" j ---- --,
"1'
Atif /I/ 5 \ 1
J � R
/.
- 7 ..," ' Y
7--
/ I `�� r
o rl
;'/
�
1 / ---,.__ i /
a i
J 1
r
i . .-_,
fi e r ;Y Y-
O N
5
i i
- s 1

Appendix D
FEMA Mapping

1960000 FEET 1980000 FEET
680000 FEET 79°8'0"W 79°7'30"W 79°7'0"W 79°6'30"W 79°6'0"W 79°5'30"W 79°5'0"W 79°4'30"W 680000 FEET
11 i i . k, n- .i �' a'* ' , -, it Lf� •
■t,.� ; • ' ...
; ` -,is i' + ,}.1.,•�`r :, I - f . , a�t 4;�., yw ��° • ; - '� -�`J CHATHAM COUNTY
"+•
'"" �. • > z93U UNINC�OO RPO° s'� AREAS-'
" a1'+y • a t.CI,5 `goio-, i �'+� 44410..}; -'.; p„a 35°37'0"N
35°37'0"N r.. ,,:< 'f
•� $ , .r r� + i ..cat r ? . ��70Z�
•, 35 r • + r•, ' - �� - td 5.1 � e L`3:�L g L-.LS
a, i Q
=•: A �+t.. . ; s.A' -., 4. P _..• _ f I,' •I' re 4a pi211M � Y 1 OP R Nqb
A.
:ia
' � I
,. .,/,..-_ - -.A.,......--1. , _ 4
e\s, ---,....„
. tii . .
Q41 iC.,.... ,sc,
°
. . ,9 -N/ , c---------...„
- . _ __- , -. _ . .- - - , '.-------),a.,.,-, ' -•;:r -• ' ® -' -..'••• -----.-------\-c
Q1 iC ,r - e
law DT cot' r I ii* .. ..,. . .
35°36'30"N it: Man . . ,. 11p. . .., ,. .
1�1
1ti 0 t 35°36'30"N
.. -
Friendship °'° - e �. 14 ' i
tti=' ► u *+ ;' 'a CG7�966CO
E Pores t(�f Dr'' ` . 17-14. 4.7H,
1 .1
!fr..,,j. . � 4� .•-0.Y : •" 'V --:°.4.- o raga F �'"t; 4 ç _
firsit,
yy1y, ,
^L sr, x_ 9�r s
+ r::+ .4p'.Y 4 v ry of to y
i . ' -.�.'LL �_ Lonnie ?`0� �^
: R' ' - �,. pombles
o
•- ' r' t, -V,t.. • ZONE co. 8 0 ►a
•
b ' . 4fritie..., ., . .,. ...A. .,',._.-1. 0
�r Ilk:' R
i .tIllir . ,.. 7 . _ Q Zp 0. l g 74
''T 35°36'0"N '. eit
. b . • cs? eillik ‘
1--\\ -\e
a•
1 ic3 206.3 a AA s Trembles onnie
,4 \ .:*
Yi {i of ,I P�.
' . r. '• - . '4- °I, 0 \ 4? c.,..„ 7.,
. _.
, .g. ,,
., __._:, . ot,::. , .,.,„ .0
- _ ....0._ .: . ,r.„-.,:: 11 4
<41•111
' :i:...-.. ..:71-;',.::.::,' .df •g•-,Z'r.. -'-,•;-:,..• i 69,6"vi. ,e'l 111,
& , .-,•;•:-;..:VV- ;-?-",,,_ ',44filw%7.' En;XV CP \ \ 0
• \\5---nd\n„.. c --A:\,..:.ty
35°35'30"N - f' _ tom' CY r` 35°35'30"N
lik
•„Jr° •r ,,,t'r:'' ,i-.'''-"I. S' L14r ,
[-„,,,,j,,,,,_,../,---
't ( ".- 3 '- ( 11:i.\\,\ UNINC C RPO° ° 7� D AREAS • flCRfl
,- .- \., ..
, : �I�ombles
� 4 Tributary d � 370.9311 !
-I A Q996.8 23�� 9 206.3 R �l' .: , . r
Rd ..
., .. i. ;a O . Lonnie Vembles _ 7 r Q
Tnbuta i.,v •
: .. ,,,,,,,k
ZONE _
, /\\ / ft. __ d ZONE D •
it
9"g Lonnie pombles
l...:.,.,...i..m. . m‘ - -a,•...
e�++' 'y1i r Tributary B \1-14,z,„,1.11..,„.:.i.,,, . , . _ .
Shad
i , Copper . 2 � �R \ .r�
,. .___ L7%-
_ p fz
35°35'0"N ~ r' = Ct
e 17;
l —
N ► .off ! 1
r•
Q9805 �/ c
1 IP* .i:'.1..ek!..,. „. ..? e . /
.: - v ' i e
!.0 �If I '
T'
s----\.,„,,..° . „,.
, ,..r
, . .
.. ,
_ _
..
Bumgamer(ip1 i
0, 1_, cg2. _. . . . ilk. 41* ,.'•.,
- V cm Chapel a]
35°34'30"N - t 35°34'30"N
/ / 4-
�q�& • ' : ._ -
(592,..._ I .
7 O,fd'0' •
y
Hg ,c( t� ti
. -- g Tributary
kl
• t‘' ' \ : “
. •1:-,g'' ' .''',,; ook ..._, . ._ _
, „, ._ . e , 4,,,
Ow Fork 5,99'' n Hughes 's-,�,'~
35°34'0"N id # tco ti
A . .. flig* lig<9. g g - t . . • ,
1',\ V` " )
ZONE G i ) o w ili—\\ . 172.9
.� •r., # m----N-_, _-e ".r i"_,
o
+a°j ZONE G
660000 FEET3 ZONE 660000 FEET
79°8'0"W 79°7'30"W 79°7'0"W 79°6'30"W 79°6'0"W 79°5'30"W 79°5'0"W 79°4.30"W
1960000 FEET 1980000 FEET
vURni ctRoLINA 4
' ' COOperafing Tei`tnical State
FEMA'S GCOPEFA11NG 'TECHNICAL PAFTNEF
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort,the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including Map Projection: E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
historic versions of this FIRM,how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet(Zone 3200) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP(1-877-336-2627)or visit the FEMA Mapco
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov.An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report,Letter of Map Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988(Vertical) L
TT .// / Revision(LOMR)or Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA)revising portions of this panel,and digital versions of this NORTH CAROLINA
H 1 1 P• FRIS.NC.GOV FRIS FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com, 1 inch = 1 1:03a�eA�-��
a
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center. r000 feet 1:12,000 y
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as 0 500 1,000 2,000 II. 9666 9666 a t
Zone A,V, A99 the current FIRM Index.These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above. cti
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO,AH, VE,AR Feet
t-INo stiff'
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. Meters
FLOOD Regulatory Floodway Y Y g 0 150 300 600 FEMA
A deTo determine if flood insurance is available in the communit ,contact our Insurance a ent or call the National
HAZARD AREAS Ceara, . Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard,Areas Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain C
Mapping Program(NCFMP).The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the PANEL LOCATOR of , co Panel Contains:
of 1%Annual Chance Flood with Average digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook(TSDN). - r
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage = COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
p g ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local ■
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile Zone X community to obtain more information,such as the estimated level of protection provided(which may exceed the / M CHATHAM COUNTY 370299 9666 K
1-percent-annual-chance level)and Emergency Action Plan• ,on the levee system(s)shown as providing protection. iIr ►+"••0 V♦ LEE COUNTY 370331 9666 K
Future Conditions 1%Annual To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood /
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance,interested /
Chance Flood Hazard Zone X parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm. 9648 /
OTHER AREAS OF F39.11
CHATHAM COUNTY 9668 9678 /
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee(PAL)note /WAKE COUNTY
r -0
FLOOD HAZARD appears on this panel,check with your local community to obtain more information,such as the estimated level of !
See Notes zone X protection provided (which may exceed the 1-percent-annual-chance level)and Emergency Action Plan,on the ,
9647 9'657 9687
OTHER levee system(s)shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation,the levee owner or community is ' \1
Areas Determined to be Outside the required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations. 9626 7/ 9666CD
AREAS o If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation -96'46 9656 9686 /\
0.2/o Annual Chance Floodplain zone X provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood 1, / 1 ■
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de-accreditation of the levee system.To mitigate flood risk in I , ii
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer residual risk areas,property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing 9605f 9 15 9625 9fi35 9645 9655 9685 \9695 ;
or otherprotective measures. For more information on flood insurance,interestedparties should visit the FEMA -. /
+ Accredited or ProvisionallyAccredited ; N. 9664 �oso4 lir CI:5
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall ______-__8694.' 9604 9614 9624 9634 9644 9654 9684 9694 ;/
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone \ _
STRUCTURES ' ' ' III , , , , , , Non-accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action(LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate /
landward limit of the 1.5-foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA / 9603 9613 9623 9633 9643 9653 9663 9673
BM5510 X North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to,but less 8682_/ 9682 /
i 0602 }�
severe than those in the VE Zone. c1. 9602 9612 9622 9632 9642 9652 9662 9672
BM5510® National Geodetic Survey bench mark Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) -t-1�
BM5510� Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark ?
0� 18-2— Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance9621 9631 9641 9651 9661 9671 Z
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE 8680 l,� 9600 / 9680 ITP
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not 9620 9630 9640 9650 9660 9670
Water Surface Elevation (BFE) available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s) //
- Coastal Transect indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal barrier.html,the /
FIS Report,or call the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1-800-344-WILD. \ 9529 9539 /
\ \ 9508 1 9548 /9568 HARNETT COU NTY
—-- --- Coastal Transect Baseline \����� CBRS Area \ . Otherwise Protected Area• 1 9528 9538 //
t � StA7f�
Profile Baseline
MOORE COUNTY�`N
9527 9537
9546 MAP NUMBER
Hydrographic Feature .� = ';:i -, ,.iini ,` n
9536 / � :!,-f'Ire - 3710966600K
OTHER Limit of Study / ,' ,�
FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary / x QIAMy, ' MAP REVISED
02/02/07

Appendix E
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Reponses

North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Ms.April Norton
Comments via Letter Dated November 18, 2019
The Division of Water Resources received a request for comments dated October 28,2019 for the
subject project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for impacts to streams in
the project area. More specifically,potential impacts to:
Table 1. Potential stream impacts within the vicinity of the project study area: Copper Mine Creek
• No stream impacts are anticipated to occur.
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of
additional streams and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area.
• Wetland delineation has occurred—refer to Section 5-2.b(4) of the Categorical Exclusion.
If any jurisdictional areas are identified, the Division of Water Resources requests that the
following environmental issues for the proposed project are considered: The environmental
document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands
and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required by ISA NCAC
2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the
environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a
40 I Water Quality Certification.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(4) (b. Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S) of the Categorical
Exclusion.
Environmental impact statement alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts
to streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs
that allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Department of Transportation Stormwater Best
Management Practices Tool box manual, such as grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour
holes, retention basins, etc.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(10) (Water Quality) of the Categorical Exclusion.
After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the
avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands(and streams)to the maximum extent practical.
In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (I SA NCAC
2H.0506[h]), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. If
mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost functions
and values. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services may be available for assistance with
wetland mitigation.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(4) (b. Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S) of the Categorical
Exclusion.
In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC
2H.0506[h]),mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 300 linear feet to any perennial
stream. If mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost

functions and values. The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services may be available for
assistance with stream mitigation.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(4) (b. Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S) of the Categorical
Exclusion.
Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, shall continue
to include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding
mapping.
• Mapping and itemized listing of impacts will be included in 401 Water Quality
Certification Application.
The NCDWR is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this
project. The NCDOT shall address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may
occur to the aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(10) (Water Quality) of the Categorical Exclusion.
An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project is required.
The type and detail of analysis shall conform to the NC Division of Water Resource Policy on the
assessment of secondary and cumulative impacts dated April IO, 2004.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(15) (Indirect/Secondary/Induced Impacts) of the Categorical
Exclusion.
The NCDOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill,
excavation and clearing, and rip rap to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need
to be included in the final impact calculations. These impacts, in addition to any construction
impacts, temporary or otherwise, also need to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality
Certification Application.
• All impacts will be included in 401 Water Quality Certification Application.
Where streams must be crossed,the NCDWR prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts.However,
we realize that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that
culverts should be countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms.
Moreover, in areas where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove
preferable. When applicable, the NCDOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the
maximum extent practicable.
• Not Applicable.
Whenever possible, the NCDWR prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
require work within the stream or grubbing of the stream banks and do not require stream channel
realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges shall allow for human and
wildlife passage beneath the structure. Fish passage and navigation by canoeists and boaters shall
not be blocked. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
• Not Applicable.
Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across
the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means(grassed swales,pre-formed scour holes,

vegetated buffers, etc.)before entering the stream. To meet the requirements of NCDOT's NPDES
permitNCS0000250, please refer to the most recent version of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation Stormwater Best Management Practices Toolbox manual for approved measures.
• Not Applicable.
Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or streams.
• No sediment and erosion control measures would be placed in a wetland and/or stream.
Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands
in borrow/waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could
precipitate compensatory mitigation.
• No impacts to wetlands and/or streams would occur from borrow/waste areas.
The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed
methods for storm water management. More specifically, storm water shall not be permitted to
discharge directly into streams or surface waters.
• Stormwater will be addressed in the Section 401 Water Quality Certification.
Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and
streams may require an application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding 401 Water Quality
Certification. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory
protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met,and no wetland or stream
uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by the
NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWR. Please be aware that any approval will be
contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the
maximum extent practical, the development of an acceptable stormwater management plan, and
the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate.
• Section 401 Water Quality Certification application will be prepared for wetland impacts.
If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct
contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured
concrete shall not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible
aquatic life and fish kills.
• Not Applicable.
If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species shall be planted. When using temporary structures,the area shall
be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other
mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-vegetate
naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
• No temporary access roads, detours, and/or bridges would be required.
Unless otherwise authorized,placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams shall
be placed below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater
than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48

inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner
that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and
downstream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the
equilibrium is being maintained if requested in writing by the NCDWR. If this condition is unable
to be met due to bedrock or other limiting features encountered during construction,please contact
the NCDWR for guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit
modification will be required.
• Not Applicable.
If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross
section as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation, floodplain
benches, and/or sills may be required where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be
avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water
velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life
passage.
• Not Applicable.
If foundation test borings are necessary; it shall be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is
approved under General 401 Certification Number 3883/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
• Not Applicable.
Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient enough to protect water resources must be
implemented and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version
ofNCS000250.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(10) (Water Quality) of the Categorical Exclusion.
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP
measures from the most current version of the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities
manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to
prevent excavation in flowing water.
• No in-water stream work would be required.
While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of
Wetland Significance (NC-CREWS) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent
inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit
approval.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(4) (b. Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S) of the Categorical
Exclusion.
Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This
equipment shall be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from
leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.

• No in-water stream work would be required.
Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner
that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly
designed, sized and installed.
• Not Applicable.
Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible.
Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end
of the growing season following completion of construction.
• Not Applicable.
As always, for any planned or proposed projects, it is recommended that during any land clearing,
demolition and construction, the Sanford-Lee County Regional Airport Authority and/or its
contractors would make every feasible effort to minimize the generation of waste, to recycle
materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in the
development of this project where suitable. Any waste generated by and of the projects that cannot
be beneficially reused or recycled must be disposed of at a solid waste management facility
permitted by the Division. The Section strongly recommends that the Sanford-Lee County
Regional Airport Authority require all contractors to provide proof of proper disposal for all
generated waste to permitted facilities.
• Refer to Section 5-2.b(4) (j. Solid Waste Management) of the Categorical Exclusion.

Appendix F
Airport Layout Drawing

BEACON 0
o� !arm=�i COMMUNICATION TOWER ' HELIPAD TLOF (F)
--
i rI - was, iUOR,cp
6' PERIMETER FENCE ,G ' L/cSpUTyERrV co 8' PERIMETER FENCE AROUND
PART 77 APPROACH - ' y�, =-��. Wit =�,jlo p TERMINAL AND FUEL FARM RS&H
-- 'yf �� �'yj, MRD Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc.
SLOPE 50:1/40:1 ! /`� �1�___ FUEL FARM g
.` �fll1/l S
8521 Six Forks Rd., Suite 400
1,000'x50,000'x16,000' � - -�' , . . � /� i _-__'�- __ •
-
i- - 'PV INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (U) /1 011Y3 - - -A '°'� Raleigh, NC 27615
-� I /I ��� -k-5 ,��5��i��Y.�v ��I NORTH CORPORATE APRON
AMMONS FARM RD //// /�� -����c�� x +"� �at _� 919-926-4100 FAX [phone]
<< V
�� o r II t f x��„ - 6' PERIMETER FENCE (F) PART 77 APPROACH SLOPE 34:1
� I �'I u� 1 l j ^ V.r��� 6 PERIMETER FENCE (E) 1,000'x10,000'x3,500' Wrsandh.com
1 PERIMETER RD (U) o Ilik0 ,' /. ` _ 3 (� ) C -��
aa(p6 qEL227' ET i .', e ex -r1 "'� �- ��'f•_ _ _ ,� � N0Re %/ \\ "- - RUNWAY 3 END 2� ii ,��I, III_ I r t3 � (40) . li 1 �j41i 44y a x����� �s�s�+ ® ,� �� _' �� FpLK SpUTyERrV 4RNORFOLK SOUTHERN RR
�� ° 127i \2 I
iirr' ,L (11- ,�_ - - .• -��r�� RUNWAY 21 END �'R�DEPARTURE RUNWAY LAT. 35 34' 26.77" I (_ -1 F 2©2 \?1r xl L_ I , I - J _� ( - __\ XLAT. 35° 35' 26.79" weaftwe
eft EL. 232.9RALEIGH EXEC
ud PROTECTION ZONE LONG. 79° 06' 18.92" k?6, , 'A: e �= l J �u� I '�%� (45 ✓'v ✓'v " ° PERIMETER RD (U)
I /J _ �- , _ 7- _� v48/ v49/ 02 I(53 LONG. 79 05' 50.71° S
X� --_- 500 x1,700 x1,010 � EL. 246.5' �, 10 :6 !�.; r °1 142 _4 -1 I _ 1 _ ) EL. 224.2' e • pT7 J E T P 0 R T
/ EL 220' EST.
I _ _ Ii T 1 l � r-� � N
X 7 %� J '. �55 r��- ��� I� 1 V46y V47� '-iv 51� 54 X X - X (-' X - X -- X - X - X X -- X - k; � � o
=''i - - _ I/ _ U r �� 20i I - 56j A`� A / 0 / �`� �` - - a e ct
I sF u
II "��� -��/��� ( BRL 35' . - _� o
�` II ' Ijjj5.i! 1 DRAINAGE r ��],..� w if • ^, ' - �a ___:_Pnzo
I� \ - - w w u_ MAIN APRON �- w y� j w I1 I 1 1 1 PERIMETER RD �# 1 '-
--� DITCH ._� N cn • A-1\ -H-3,-
til I ! _ _ ` o 1------
,1
I \v �e f._._,� _ �� \ _� - - d I - E7 � - - Q/ TOF5 0/ \ TSA- _ \ �ITWY A - - - vJo1 oU = APPROACH/DEPARTURE
_ "' _ RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE
f- // - -----
1 _ - 10011�r� ems. , �� - RALEIGH
��'' - �� 1002 r _ - LOCALIZER500'x1,700'x1,010' \ EXECUTIVE
< --- __ - .. �! Q _- - \ / - - - _- \ / �. - _ - \ SHELTER ? `.
1vSa n_ �d� SA -_-_ Sb • -RSA bSb n RSA dSa n RSA dSa n RSA �� n RSA, - , � JETPORT
s i w u I- w w I�
I- '' ' - - - - t I� � Z ---- S RO.Z - RSA/ROFZ ZB02i/dSii - .-. /��/ /%Rf��/ / / II
INNER APPROACH1OF2 1 T ,% I� ��,��� \ - -___ �� M I __ 220 LOCALIZER °`'•%...0111"1111117
11 �y y ��-. / �� LOCALIZER
- I _/ - MALSR - - - - _ ! _ r °� 3/2�6 500' x 100' 21-00° -. CRITICAL AREA _____ \ IP - sANFORD, NC
THRESHOLD `` - I /..
\-_-:=
� LIGHTS _ I 1 - f� I J -��ozz �\ REIL //ii/ /%� ' t.'
q � = I RSA/04 D -\ ®I' - -�--- - - ' ._. I. m �■ z 9a/vsam I k I�// I -
`�R T oFz za0 ,vsa -- oa/vsa- RSA Ro d /// 1V , ,I v.a n - rs.� u-RSA vsa n RSA vsa n RSA vsa n - Rnvsa n R A �:- r �' - , . I AWOS U 'I ,,.\ m O _ d-TSA dSL n _(G}sA - VAO -- I \ '
\ ��i-y: d _ASP �� ��,<��� PERIMETER RD (U)�' �� • <<
\ I _ U'-TOFA / VS1-n a-TSA vs1-n vsl-n _ TSA vs1- �.
'a ,---- \ mff u-TSA EGMENTED CIRCLE vaol n u-T. �.' o
- 0 A - EL. 228' EST. �� ^ 'f AIRPORT
p1 n �- off J �•� \!�
PERIMETER RD (U) ._y - -\RI �`�'� � LIGHTED -v \\ - �j
I �� - r's1 n / WITH LIGHTED WINDCONE E "'I�'i •` -� �' g lll�
EL 23T EST. - a-TOF 3oi r\ ) �Vr % WI DC�N1= THRESHOLD LIGHTS =��o J LAYOUT
-- - BR 31- -I-S ��- - __ - _. £ TaB - _ - __ - - .5c 7..e. �57 BRL 35' `,SS -I�'9� - BR_ 35'- z ,SF 189 p - BF,T I;5' - & _ SS' ` i. �.LL d_
X X X X X X X X ^ X X X - --iii X►iv� X - XN�ok��df►L - C� �� - �- , PLAN
MALSR RUNWAY 3 ' ` �` 'P SEGMENTED CIRCLE ARP RUNWAY 21 RUNWAY 3-21 0 ° ° \ t• _ s�
LLId PERIMETER RD (U) EQUIPMENT TDZ EL. 246.6' GLIDESLOPE WITH LIGHTED LAT. 35° 34' 57" TDZ EL. 229.8' LOW POINT , ap PERIMETER RD (U) •
EL. 250' EST. SHELTER HIGH POINT ANTENNA (U) WINDCONE (U) LONG. 79° 06' 05" EL. 222.6' I - \ EL. 210' EST. ,
APPROACH RUNWAY DRAINAGE DITCH ��
O CONSULTANTS
PROTECTION ZONE EASEMENT (F) GLIDESLOPE GLIDESLOPE AWOS 500' o LOWER
1,000'x2,500'x1,750' 0.03 ACRES CRITICAL AREA (E) ANTENNA(E) CRITICAL AREA(E) 6' PERIMETER FENCE i_i --6m.maaffm» No ,, URERO MONCURE RD
AWOS 500' % 0 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (U) • RMONG EL. 210.2
GLIDESLOPE CRITICAL AREA(U) 04
CRITICAL AREA (U) • o
I\ . _. s'
1.rI
MAGNETIC DECLINATION
-' 0c- - 8°56'WEST
4,' A JANUARY,2018
• ANNUAL CHANGE 0°3'WEST
•` 500' 250' 0 500'
DESCRIPTION EXISTING FUTURE ULTIMATE EXISTING BUILDING LEGEND FUTURE BUILDING LEGEND FUTURE BUILDING LEGEND ULTIMATE BUILDING LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE I I I I - - II - II - II - II - TOP TOP TOP
BUILDING TOP BUILDING BUILDING TOP
BUILDING DESCRIPTION BUILDING DESCRIPTION ELEVATION BUILDING DESCRIPTION ELEVATION BUILDING DESCRIPTION ELEVATION
EASEMENT N/A N/A NO ELEVATION NO (EST.) NO (EST.) NO (EST.)
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA
N/A I 'C�i-R RSA �� : 1 TEMPORARY TERMINAL - 20 NEW TERMINAL 280' 39 CORPORATE HANGAR 275' 55 AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING (ARFF) 283'
-----c-Rsr,----
ROFA N/A N/A 2 FBO 277' 21 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 40 CORPORATE HANGAR 286' 56 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (ATCT)-OPTION 1 290'
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA ROFA 3 7 UNIT T-HANGAR 268' 22 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 41 CORPORATE HANGAR 284' 57 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (ATCT)-OPTION 2 299'
RUNWAY OBSTACLE FREE ZONEMUM N/A N/A 4 19 UNIT T-HANGAR 286' 23 PRIVATE HANGAR r 279' 42 CORPORATE HANGAR 284'
1. ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA
1777 7777,7 7,7 N/A N/A 5 30 UNIT T-HANGAR 266' 24 15 UNIT T-HANGAR 269' 43 CORPORATE HANGAR 280' LEVEL (MSL).PRECISION OBSTACLE FREE ZONE r r r�� ( ) REVISIONS
_ 6 15 UNIT T-HANGAR 265' 25 35 UNIT T-HANGAR 269' 44 CORPORATE HANGAR 280' 2. ATCT OPTION 1 AND 2 ARE ANTICIPATED 50'STRUCTURES THAT
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE C ] N/A N/A 7 15 UNIT T-HANGAR 259' 26 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 45 CORPORATE HANGAR 277' NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
- - PENETRATE THE PART 77 TRANSITIONAL SURFACE. OBSTRUCTION
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA TSA N/A U-TSA 8 17 UNIT T-HANGAR 269' 27 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 46 CORPORATE HANGAR 272' LIGHTING WILL BE NEEDED.
9 PRIVATE HANGAR 266' 28 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 47 CORPORATE HANGAR 272'
TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA TOFA N/A u-TOFA 10 FLY CLUB HANGAR 274' 29 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 48 CORPORATE HANGAR 272'
35' BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE BRL 35' N/A N/A 11 PRIVATE HANGAR 272' 30 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 49 CORPORATE HANGAR 264'
12 PRIVATE HANGAR 272' 31 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 50 CORPORATE HANGAR 264'
PART 77 SURFACE PT77 N/A N/A
13 PRIVATE HANGAR 275' 32 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 51 _CORPORATE HANGAR 264'
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT 7 7 14 PRIVATE HANGAR 273' 33 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 52 CORPORATE HANGAR 2E4'
-
N/A N/A 15 PRIVATE OFFICE 267' 34 PRIVATE HANGAR 27g' 53 CORPORATE HANGAR 260'
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED `
16 PRIVATE HANGAR 282' 35 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' 54 CORPORATE HANGAR 260'
1 7 r 7 - DATE ISSUED: MARCH 2O19
BUILDINGS 1 J 1 1 17 PRIVATE STORAGE 265' 36 PRIVATE HANGAR 279'
REVIEWED BY: ADN
BUILDINGS TO BE REMOVED N/A ] N/A 18 PRIVATE HANGAR 286' 37 PRIVATE HANGAR 279' FAA APPROVAL BLOCK DRAWN BY: CDM
19 PRIVATE HANGAR 270' 38 FIELD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 285'
ROADWAY/PARKING 1 _1 1 DESIGNED BY:TJM
ROADWAY/PARKING TO BE REMOVED N/A N/A AEP PROJECT NUMBER
203-0025-001
AIRFIELD LIGHT • N/A N/A
©2019 RS&H, INC.
REIL N/A N/A SHEET TITLE
PAPI MMMM N/A N/A
ARP 0 N/A N/A AIRPORT
BEACON N/A N/A LAYOUT
WINDCONE N/A 1.NOTES:
ALL LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES ARE IN NORTH AMERICAN DATUM PLAN
TREES .Up 1 '' N/A N/A OF 1983 (NAD 83).
2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88).
FENCE - X X X- XX XX N/A 3. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL). SURVEY MONUMENTS SHEET NUMBER
4. ROADWAY AND RAILROAD ELEVATIONS INCLUDE TRAVERSEWAY ADJUSTMENT IDENTIFIER NGS PID PACS OR SACS LATITUDE LONGITUDE ELEVATION
DRAINAGE DITCH N/A N/A (23' RAILROADS 117' HIGHWAYS 115' PUBLIC ROADS 110' PRIVATE ROADS).
5. EXISTING/FUTURE RUNWAY HOLDING POSITIONS ARE 250' FROM RUNWAY 1001 N/A N/A 35° 34' 37.430" N 79° 06' 18.452" W 242.4' 4 OF 14
GROUND CONTOURS N/A N/A CENTERLINE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. 1002 N/A N/A 35° 35' 17.863" N 79° 05' 58.863" W 220.7'
NGS MONUMENT QI 'PACS/SACS N/A N/A 6. ULTIMATE RUNWAY HOLDING POSITIONS ARE 253' FROM RUNWAY CENTERLINE
ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. SOURCE: WOOLPERT, INC., NAD 83 (2011), NAVD 88
CORAFT
Drawing: C:Apw_work\rsh_pw\merrillt\d0210427\TTA_04_ALP.dwg Plotted on: 7,22/2019 9:19 AM Plotted by: Merrill, Tommy