WQ0000701_Regional Office Historical File_20171231 (11)

Mr, `el Crowe, Plant Manager
Tyson Poultry. Inc.
P. , Box 158
Harmony, North Carolina 28634
Y*Michael F."Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.'Sacrstary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Koff T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 27, 2001
Permit No. ' `Q0000701
Tyson Poultry, Inc.
Harmony, NC rendering Plant
lredell County, NC
Bear Mr, Crowe:
Our records show that Permit No. WQ00 0701 was issued on June 15, 2001 for the land
application of sludge generated by your wastewater treatment facility, The purpose of this letter is to advise
your of die importance of the Permit and the liabilities in the event of failure to comply with the terms and'
conditions of the Permit, If you have not already done so, it is requested that you and other appropriate
employees thoroughly read the Permit.
The Pe it sets forth specific perfortnance standards, operation and maintenance ce requirements,
monitoring requirements, including annual reporting and groundwater monitoring activities to be
pet onraed'by the Pennitt e, plus general conditions applicable to non -discharge perinits, Failure to comply -
with the terms and conditions of the permit subjects the Permittee to enforcement action pursuant to
Section 143-215.6 of the North Carolina. general Statutes, A civil penalty of u a to $1,0,000 per violation
may be assessed for such violations:
Please saute that the subject Permit expires on May 31, 2006, Condition No. VI, No, 8 of the
Permit requires that a renewal request be submitted at least sip () months prior to expiration, Also the
Permit is non -transferable until such time that the Permittee has requested a name change to the new
Permittee.
s mentioned previously, the purpose of this lever is to advise you of the importance of vour
Permit. Please read the <Permit and contact this office at 704/663-1699 in Mooresville ifvou have any
questions or need: clarification. We loop forward to providing any assistance,
Sincerely
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
'Water Quality Regional Supervisor
\.Tyssu.r D,tf l to:dee
9 if JOA
Customer SerAce Mooresville Regional Office, 919 forth Main Street, Mooresville, NC 261 is PHONE i c4l 666-1699
1 800 6•77 (704) 66 -6040

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEINIFNTCOAL'IISSIONN
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOUTR"ES
RALEIGH
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PER -MIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and
other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS 14EREBY GRANTED TO
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Wilkes County
FOR THE
operation of a wastewater residuals land application program consisting of the application of 4,071 dry tons per
year of residuals from the sources listed in Condition 115, to approximately 2,270 acres of land in Alexander,
Davie, Rowan, Yadkin., and Wilkes Counties with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the
correction request received on March 25, 1998, and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other
supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2000, shall void Permit No.
WQ0000701 issued March 5, 1998, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORN—IANCE STANDARDS
I The Mooresville Regional Office (for all new sites located in Alexander County), telephone number
[phone], or the Winston-Salem Regional Office (for all new sites located in Wilkes County),
telephone number [phone], and the appropriate local governmental official (counry
manager/city manager) shall be notified at least twvnty-four (24) hours prior to the initial application of
the residuals to a site so that an inspection can be made of the application sites and application method.
Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours from 8:00
a,m, until 5:00 p.m. on 110onday through Friday, excluding State Holidays. In addition, the Alexander
and 'vVilkes County Manager's office must be notified prior to the initial application so that they will be
aware that the operation has commenced,
2, This permit shall become voidable if the soils fail to adequately assimilate the wastes and may be
rescinded unless the sites are maintained and operated in a manner Nvhich will protect the assigned
water quality standards of the surface waters and ground waters.
3� The land application program shall be, effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of any wastes resulting from the operation of this program.
4The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to surface
or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this program.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James 8, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 31, 1998
Lawrence R. Sampson, Jr., Project Engineer
Tyson Foods., Inc,
Post Office Box 88
Wilkesboro, North Carolina 28697
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTmEN7 OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RF-SOURCES
Subject: Fom"ItN&IWQ0000701�,
Land Application of Wastewater Residuals
WiltsCounty-
Dear Mr. Sampson
C,
In accordance with the correction request received on March 25, 1998, we are forwarding herewith Permit
No. WQ0000701 as corrected, dated March 31., 19'98.1 to the Tyson Foods, Inc, for the continued operation of a
wasteNvater residuals land application program. This Pe it is being corrected to delete the TCLP analysis from the
subject permit. Originally required annually, the TCLP was reduced to once per permit cycle, however, the
Division has now deleted this requirement altogether.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2000.1 shall void Permit No.
NVQ0000701 issued March 51, 1998, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Please pay particular attention to the monitoring and reporting requirements contained in this permit, failure to
3
establish an adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational information will result in
future compliance problems,
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit. This
request must be in the form of a written petition, conforining to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P,O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh,, NC 27611-7447. Unless such
demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr, Michael D, Allen at (919)
733-5083 extension 547. sr
Sincere.,
'--A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ce- Alexander, Davie, Rowan, Yadkin, and Wilkes County Health Departments
Terra Renewal Senviees, Inc.
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Mooresville Regional Office, Groundwater Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Groundwater Section
Bob Check, Groundwater Section. Central Office
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit (no revised rating)
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

A suitable vegetative cover, as listed in condition 114, shall be maintained in accordance with the crop
management plan outlined by the local Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture, the Natural
Resource Conservation Service, or other agronomist, and approved by this Division.
3, An acceptable PH must be maintained in the soil, residual and lime mixture, greater than 6.0, on all
land application sites to insure optimum yield for the crop(s) specified below, The agronomist shall
provide information on the PH best suited for the specified crop and the soil type.
4. The application rates shall not exceed the following for the specified crops'
!C r PAN lb, PAN Qb.Lacre/vr.)
Alfalfa 200 Forest (Hardwood & Softwood) 75
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture) 220 Milo 100
Blue Grass 120 Small Grain (Nklheat, barley, oats) 100
Co m (Grain) 160 Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture) 180
Corn (Silage) 200 Sorghum, Sudex (Silage) 220
Cotton 70 Soybeans 200
Fescue 250 Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass 200
5- No residuals other than the following are hereby approved for land application in accordance with this
permit:
Permit Volume
Source Count),,, NT u rn be r (dry ton wear)
Harmony Plant; DAY, Stickwater, CL, Iredell NCO005126 2,250
Wilkesboro Plant; DAF Wilkes Town of Wilkesboro Included Above
Pretreatment No, 1003-1
Case Farms Facility DAF Burke WQ0007511 1,064
Townsend Foods, Inc. Chatham NCO026441 757
6. The lifetime heavy metal loadings (lbs./acre) shall not exceed the following for the corresponding
Cation Exchange Capacities (CEQ:
Parameter CEC < 5 CEC 5 to 15 CEC > 15
Lead 500 1000 2000
Zinc 250 Soo 1000
Copper 125 250 500
Nickel 125 250 500
Cadmium 4,5 9 18
7. Upon classification of the facility by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commission (WPCSOCC'), the Permittee shall employ a certified land application/residuals operator to
be in responsible charge (ORC) of the land application program. The operator must hold a certificate
of the type classification assigned to the land application program by the WPCSOCC. The Permittee
must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type to comply with the conditions of
15A NCAC 8A.0202.
K Adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters,
9. Surface applied residuals will be plowed or disced within twenty-four (24) hours after application on
lands 'with no cover crop established.
10, For areas that are prone to flooding or within the I lift -year flood elevation, residuals may be applied
only during periods of dry weather. The residuals must be incorporated into the soil within t-,verity-four
(24) hours after application.
3

5. In the event that the land application program is not operated satisfactorily, including the cre�
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall cease applying residuals to the sites and take any irn 1`14
corrective actions as may be required by the Division of Water Quality (Division).
6. Some of the buffers specified below may not have been included in previous permits for this land
application operation. However, any sites or fields that are included in this permit, but were approved
with different applicable buffers shall be reflagged to comply with the below buffers. The following
buffer zones shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet from residences or places of public assembly under separate ownership for surface
application method- however, the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a minimurn of 100
pp
feet upon written consent of the owner and approval from the appropriate regional office,
b) 200 feet from residences or places of public assembly under separate ownership for subsurface
residual injection method; however, the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a minimum of
100 feet LIP011 written consent of the owner and the appropriate regional office,
c) 100 feet from any public or private water supply source, waters classified as SA or SB, and any
Class or Class 11 impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking water for both methods,
d) 100 feet from any streams classified as WS or B, any other stream, canal, marsh or coastal waters
and any other lake or impoundment for surface application,
e) 50 feet from any streams classified as WS or B, any other stream, canal, marsh or coastal waters
and any other lake or impoundment for subsurface application,
ft 50 feet from property lines for both surface and subsurface application methods;
g) 50 feet from public right of ways for both application methods,
h) 10 feet from upslope interceptor drains and surface water diversions for both application methods,
i) 25 feet from downslope interceptor drains, surface water diversions, groundwater drainage systems
and surface drainage ditches for both application methods,
J) 100fyet firom rock outcrol)s,
7. A cop), of this permit shall be maintained at the land application site when residuals are being applied
during the life of this permit, A spill prevention and control plan shall be maintained in all residuals
transport and application vehicles.
8, Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site prior to and during
application,
9. No residuals at any time shall be stored at any application site, unless approval has been requested and
obtained from the Division.
10. Maximum slope for residual application shall be 10% for surface application and 18% for subsurface
applications.
11, When wastewater residuals containing a contrihutionfi-om domestic '�iwsteivater are applied, the Class
B pathogen requirements as defined in 40 CFR Part-503 or the Process to Significantly Reduced
Pathogens (PSRP) as defined in 40 CFR Part 257 Appendix 11 shall be met. Additionally, an
evaluation must be performed wbich demonstrates the residuals ability to comply with this
requirement. Upon request, a copy of this evaluation must be submitted including all test results and
calculations.
11 In order to reduce potential odor problems created by the land application of materials from the animal
processing facilities, sufficient lime will be added to the residuals to create a uniform mixture and
Z--
achieve a pH of 10 for thirty minutes prior to injection into the soil.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
I The facilities and application sites shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2

Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during active
site
site use and for the 12-month period following the last residual application event. Such controls may
include the posting of signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
12, Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind erosion and surface runoff from conveying
pollutants from the residuals application area onto the adjacent property or into any surface waters.
13. Residuals shall not be applied in inclement weather or until 4 hours following a rainfall event of 1/2-
inch or greater in 24 hours. Any emergency residuals disposal measures must first be approved by the
Division,
14, Residuals shall not be applied to any, land application site that is flooded, frozen or snow-covered,
15. Residuals shall not be applied at rates greater than agronomic rates, unless authorized by the Division,
1Animals shall not be grazed on an application site for 30 days after residuals application. Application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access after each
application.
17. Food crops. feed crops and fiber crops that do not come in contact with the residuals shall not be
harvested for 30 days after residuals application.
18, Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residual/soil mixture and are totally above the land
surface (ex, tobacco, melons, cucumbers, squash, etc.) shall not be harvested for 14 months after
residuals application.
19. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land (root crops such as potatoes, carrots,
radishes, etc.) shall not be harvested for 20 months after application of residuals when the residuals
remain on the land surface for four (4) months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
20. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for 38 months after
application of residuals when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four (4) months
prior to incorporation into the soil.
21. Turf shall not be harvested for I year after residuals application if the turf is to be placed on land with a
high potential for public exposure.
TH. MONITORING ANT REPORTILN!�.I�U�IREM�ENT§
I Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, residuals, soil, or plant tissue analyses) deemed
necessary by the Division to insure protection of the environment will be established and an acceptable
sampling and reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. Proper records shall be maintained by the pert-nittee tracking all application activities. These records
shall include, but are not necessarily limited to the following information:
a. source of residuals
b. date of residual application
c. location of residual application (site, field, or zone 4)
d. method of application
e. weather conditions (sunny, cloudy, raining, etc.)
f. soil conditions
g. type of crop or crops to be grown on field
h. volume of residuals applied in gallons/acre, dry tons/acre or kilograms/bectarc
(continued on area page)
4

H
i. annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of residuals, annual and cumulativ(
each heavy metal (which shall include, but not be limited to cadmiurm copper, I
zinc), annual pounds/acre of plant available nitrogen (PAN), and annual POLinds/act
applied to each field,
A representative annual soils analysis (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be conducted on each site
receiving residuals in the respective calendar year and the results maintained on file by the Permittee
for a minimum of five years.
The Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following
parametcrs�
Acidity Manganese Potassium
Calcium Percent Humic Matter Sodium
Copper PH Zinc
Magnesium Phosphorus Base Saturation (by calculation)
Cation Exchange Capacity
4. A residuals analysis will be, conducted annually from the date of permit issuance by the Permittee and
the results maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years, If land application occurs
at a frequency less than annually, a residuals analysis will be required for each instance of land
application. The residuals analysis shall include but is not necessarily limited to the following
parameters:
Aluminum Ammonia -Nitrogen Calcium
Magnesium Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen '/"o Total Solids
pH Phosphorus Potassium
Sodium TKN
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
In addition to the above, the following pollutants shall be tested in each residual once prior to renewal:
Cadmium Copper Lead
Nickel Zinc
5, All residuals included in this permit must be monitored annually from the date of permit issuance, for
compliance with condition I I I and/or 12 of this permit (if necessary), Data to verify stabilization of
I
the residuals must be maintained by the Permittee. The required data is specific to the stabilization
process utilized, but should be sufficient to clearly demonstrate compliance the Class B pathogen
requirements as defined in 40 CFR Part 503 or the Process to Significantly Reduced Pathogens (PSRP)
as defined -in 40 CFR. Part 257 Appendix 11.
6, Three copies of all required monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in conditions 111 1, 111
2, 1113, 111 4, and 111 5 shall be submitted annually on or before March I of the following year to the
following address�
NC Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
5

PF7- rN0 neompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Winston-Salem Regional Office, telephone number (910)
771-4600, for sites located in Davie, Yadkin, and Wilkes Counties, and the Mooresville Regional
Office, telephone number (704) 663- 1699, for sites located in Alexander and Rowan Counties, as soon
as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or
first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the land application prograrn which results in the land application of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity, or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the land application program resulting in a release of material to receiving waters,
c. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility has gone out of compliance
with the conditions and limitations of this permit or the parameters on which the system was
designed,
& Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility incapable of
adequate residual treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting residuals to the application
site,
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within
five (5) days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline the actions taken or
proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
I The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A NCAC
2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary is for the disposal system
constructed after December 31, 1983 is established at either (1) 250 feet from the waste disposal area,
or (2) 50,feet within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the waste disposal area. An
exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to
immediate remediation action in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under General Statute
143-21 5,6A(a)(1),
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2L, a REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the disposal
systenis midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste disposal area. Any
exceedance of standards at the Review Boundary shall require rernediation action on the part of the
permittee.
2. Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall be provided,
1 No land application of waste activities shall be, undertaken when the seasonal high water table is less
than three feet below land surface.
V. INSPECTIONS
I Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division may, upon presentation of
credentials , enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site or
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect
or copy, any records that must be kept under tile to and conditions of this permit-, and may obtain
samples of groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
6

fa
r lead
Permittee
'11
1 The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the residuals storage, transport, and application a
prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or lead
release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee sh
maintain an inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations
made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This log of
inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of five years from the date of the
inspection and shal I be made available to the Division or other permitting authority, upon request.
V1. GENERAL CONDITIONS
I This permit shall become voidable unless the land application activities are carried out in accordance
with the conditions of this permit, the supporting materials, and in the manner approved by this
Division.
2, This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in the
application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not automatically transferable. In the event that there is a desire for the facilities to
change ownership or a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be submitted to the
Division accompanied by an application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other
supporting materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its
merits and may or may not be approved.
4The following are approved sites for residuals application (see attached map[sj):
Application Area [acres]
Site No,
Ownerfl-essee
(excludingbuffers)
Alexander Count-y
AL 1-01
John Henry Barnes
8.5
AL 1-02'
John Henry Barnes
9.8
AL 1-03'
John Henry Barnes
165
AL 1-04
John HeM, Barnes
155
AL 2-01
Michael Bowles
WO
AL 2-02
Michael Bowles
5,5
At, 2-03
Michael Bowles
lU
AL 3-01
Vaughn Rogers
17.4
AL 3-0
aughn Rogers
23 2
AL 3 - 0 3
Vaughn Rogers
3&8
AL 3-04 b
Vaughn Rogers
13,2
AL 3-05 b
Vaughn Rogers
12.8
AL 3-06
Vaughn Rogers
18.3
AL 3-07
Vaughn Rogers
14.1
AL 3-08
Vaughn Rogers
10.1
AL 3-09
Vaughn Rogers
4.6
AL 3-10 b
Vaughn Rogers
18.0
AL 3-11 '1 b
Vaughn Rogers
119
AL 3-12 b
Vaughn Rogers
29A
AL 3-13
Vaughn Rogers
l&6
AL 3-14
Vaughn Rogers
29;9
AL 3-15
Vaughn Rogers
8.0
AL 3-16
Vaughn Rogers
10.9
AL 3-17
Vaughn Rogers
29;9
AL 3-18
Vaughn Rogers
30.6
7

TOTAL ACRES IN COUNTY
422.3
Application Area [acres]
Site No,
OwnerF Lesse
excludin buffers)
Davie County
HD -ill
Herbert Dooley
l-ilk- 22
Herbert Dooley
183
GD-ill
Gregg Dooley
23,E
TOTAL ACRES IN COUNTY
83.3
Rowan County
13
Dr. Richard Adams
2 .11
r. Richard Adams
13.
R
Dr, Richard Adams
30,0
Dr._ Richard Adams
60.0
K
Dr, Richard Adams
60,0
Dr. Richard Adams
150.0
Dr. Richard Adams
X0
r. Richard Adams
93.0
Dr, Richard .Adams
W
R
Dr. Richard Adaaaas
253 O,
Dr. Richard d Adams
30.0
TOTAL ACRES IN COUNTY
WO
`dikes Count),
\V 1-01
Diana Pardue Mathis
6436;
WK 2 pl
Villas Hudspeth
39.05
WK 2-02,
Dallas Hudspeth
14.34
WK 2-0
"rim Hudspeth
64.90
AkK 3-02.
Donald and Mae Duncan,
51.70
WK 4- 1
Donald Duncan
3 8.81
TOTAL ACRES IN COUNTY
273,15
Yadkin County
YK 1- 1
Lemuel Chamberlain
40M
YK 1-02
Lenuel Chamberlain
49.91
YK 1- 3
Lemuel Chamberlain
161
YK 1. 3
Lemuel Chamberlain
18A7
"t`K 1-06
Lenuel Chamberlain
44.0
YK 1-07
Lemuel Chamberlain
8 ,8t7
YK 1-08
Lemuel Chamberlain
19,4
YK 1-09
Lemuel Chamberlain
12.34
YK 1-10
Lemuel Charitberlaiaz
9.40
YK 1-11
Lemuel Chamberlain
61.65
YK 1-12
Lemuel Chamberlain
25.10
Y% 1-13
Lemuel Chamberlain
4.19
YK 1-14
Lemuel Chamberlain
7 33
YK 1-13
Lemuel Chamberlain
3062
YK 1-16
Lemuel Chamberlain
1 ;'1
YID 1-17
Lemuel Chamberlain
6A8
YID 1-18
Lemuel Chamberlain
13.69

(Continued on next page)
Application Area [acres]
Site No,
Owner/Lessee
(excluding buffers
YK 1-19
Lenuel Chamberlain
2436
YK 1.2p
Lenuel Chamberlain
1164
YK 1 -2 1
Lenuel Chamberlain
1193
YK I - 22 2
Lenuel Chamberlain
635
YK 1-23
Lenuel Chamberlain
4738
YK 1-24
Lenuel Chamberlain
8m56
YK 1 -2 5
Lenuel Chamberlain
21.95
YK 1-26
Lenuel Chamberlain
5.34
YK 2-01
Thomas Peachey
8,09
YK 2-02
Thomas Peachey
24.23
YK 2-03
Thomas Peachey
26,07
YK 2-04
Thomas Peachey
3111
YK 2-05
Thomas Peachey
5,66
YK 2-06
Thomas Peachey
35.04
YK 2-07
Thomas Peachey
13.73
YK 2-08
Thomas Peachey
3T03
YK 2-09
Thomas, Peachey
10,73
YK 2-10
Thomas Peacbey
10.05
YK 2-11
Thomas Peachey
&00
YK 2-12
Thomas Peachey
11,22
YK 5-01
Ronald C. Howard
7.00
YK 5-02
Claude and Ralph Howard
2 6,210
YK 5-03
John'. Howard
36.00
TOTAL ACRES IN COUNTY
8W85
TOTAL AVAILA13LE ACRES
2,270.00
This land application site is partially covered in soils having a seasonal high water table at depths
ranging from zero to three feet below land surface. No residuals shall be applied to this field during
the period front November through April, inclusive, unless angering on the site verifies that the
apparent water table is greater than three feet below land surface.
Approval must be obtained from the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number [phone],
Prior to beginning land application operations on this field„
This field has slopes up to 18% therefore, all residuals niust be injected. In addition, this field must
be monitored closely to ensure that no runoff occurs.
6. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the Permittee to
an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A
to 143-215.6C,
6, The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Pernirttee within thirty (30) days
after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause the Division to initiate
action to revoke this pen -nit as specified by 15 NCAC 2H 0205 (c)(4),
T The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Pennittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local', state, and
federal) which have jurisdiction.
I

11r_
Tile Permittee, at least six (6) months; prior to the expiration of this pert -nit, shall request its extension®
Upon receipt of the request. the Commission will review the adequacy of the facilities described
therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time and under such conditions and
litttitations as it may deem appropriate.
p, This permit may be modified, med, or revoked and reissued to incorporate any conditions, limitations and
monitoring requirements the Division deems necessary in order to adequately protect the environment
and public health.
1€ , This permit shall become voidable awnless the agreements between the Perrnittee and the
Ian do��ners/]essees are in full force and effect. The land owner agreements are considered expired
concurrent with the expiration date of the permit and must be renewed at the same time the permit is
renewed.
Permit issued this the: thirty-first day of larch, 1998
NORTH X
INA T IRO F ITAL ANAGEMENT COMMISSION
r
s
, Freston Howard, Jr., P.., Director
Division of Water Quality
y .Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number bemr* WQ000 701
10

EVe
p
.,°
t TV
Sludge Land Applications/Disposal Report Form
Annual
Sludge Analysis
19 1
Per ittee: Holly Farms Poultry Industries, Inc. ( r-mon Plait)
Permit No.: t
100RESVIIIE REGIUKALPEKE
Sludge Sample No.1Z Date Collected Location arplin
Parameter Wet Concentration *Dry Concentration
**Dry Loading
( I)
( �` )
(Ib dty ton)
PO4 as p
6
a
a
ra
NH3as N
. 4 .,
N2 I+ N2
61-N
0. 1
d
Oil & Grease
A
CU
4
�
PCP
N
i,,
. 5
Pb
0 , .<
2
i. I e idua Chlorine
P.A.N. I ubsur ac
- (2) Surface Applied
Total. Solids O
pH (.u.)
e sludge p (circle as applicable):
I) compost, DAP, aerobic digested,
anaerobic digested,
drying beds,.
centrifuge, belt press, other
(specify)
'r concentration g - t
5 ( J`k ) ref concentration (� /l) x 100
solids
*Dry loading (lb t /dry° ton) - .002 x
mg/kg
(I) If applied by subsurface injection:
P.A.N. ('Plant Available Nitrogen) ; .2 (T .CNN as N - N 2
N ) (NH3as N + N 2 N )
2) It surface applied:
.2 (T _ ` as N - NO2 e, N 2,) - 5 (NH3as N NO2+Not

i
Page I of 3
Sludge Land Applications/Disposal Report Form
Annual Sludge Analysis
WK-KMOOM
Pe itt e# Holly Farms Poultry Industries, Inc. ( Plant)
Permit No. 000v to
Sludge Sample No. �V Tate Collected 1 - -10 Location of Sampling
.ParameterWet Concentration *Dry Concentration **Dry Loading
( /l) (mg/kg) Ubs�dry ton)
TKO
qo2da
NH3 as N
zol_.
N 2 + NO3
.d
Oil & Greaseto 0oo
�
u
11040
PCB
i
b
9
Residual Chlorine MtA
(2) Surface Applied
Total ,Solids ( ;.
PH (su.) "
Type of sludge (circle as applicable): T) compost;, DAF, aerobic digested
anaerobic digested drying bads,,
centrifuge} belt press, other
(specify)
*Dry concentration (mg/kg) wet concentration (m /l) - 100
solids
**Dry fading (l s./dr toy) = .002 x mg/kg
(1) If applied by subsurface injection:
* *P.A. . (plant Available Nitrogen) .2 (T NH as N - NO2 - )" + (NH3as N N 2 O )
(2) If surface applied:

Page 1 of 3
.
Sludge Land Applications/Disposal Repor
Annual Sludge Analysis
Permittee, dolly Farms Poultry Industries, Inc.
Permit No. w
Sludge Sample No. Date Collected _ Location of Sampling
Parameter Wet Concentration *Dry Concentration Dry Loading
(m) ) lbs/dry ton)
PO4 as TKIN
NH3as N 5-920
NO2 0
Cd 0.001
Oil & Crease
Cu
PCB
Ni
Pb
2n
^ Residual. Chlorine
P.A.N. () Subs fac
r
(2) 'Saar ode pplied -Z`
Total Solids )r
pd s.U.)
Type of sludge (circle as applicable). 1)- compost, DAF, aerobic digested
anaerobic digested, drying beds
centrifuge, belt press, other
V
(specify)
*Dry concentration (mg/kg) - wet concentration (mg/1) x 100
solids
' Dry loading (lbs./dry tor) .002 x mg/kg
) If applied by subsurface injection:
P. .N. (Plant ,availableNitrogen) .2 (TKN-NH3as N - NOZ 03) ( as N + 02- C )
2 If surface applied:
.2 (TKN-NH3 as N - NO2 - IBC .5 s - NO2+NO )

RE PORI' NUNWER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC
HU1r—U4L 7621 hi in Road # Richmond Virginia 23237 * 004) 743-9401
SAMPLFS
S f. N D SUBMITTED
T rl HULLY FORMS rWi �, MAINI f;Rf1b1jFR, P u nEM— 3UZ"�;L' BY,
v () 3 0 x ,Ii ;J
WILid EShOR0 NC ?,tO'Yf
DATE OP REPOW I VA C; F,, I SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ORGANIC PHOSPHOAUS POTASSIUM MAGNESIUM CALCIUM SODIUM PH Cation
HYDR01 RASE SATIJAAIION ICOMPOTED)
MATtER P-2 --------- GEN Exchaftge -- I - ----
LAD K N19 Ca Na SOIL BUFFER copaltity
. . (WE4�81avj N,,HC(),4 P % SAMPLE NUMBER ENO .... EEC K PAD Na
NUMBER RATt IbAJA opm P RAI( pok" f RAI ppm K RAI E ppahEIRATE PRO Ck RATE ppm ft* __RAT PH ON RvM11 000 Ineq/11)(RE
J21 u 414 4 J. H V H 5 0 0 5 L "I G.0 4 . '17 . "i a5 j
4A tj 4! 4 3 4, 1 eJ 1� I I z� ;11 4 Aj H r 10 fw,� 4f VL 6,. h 5.11 0 1 '1� d 3 . 4 o.0 —
U L, 4 6 YI I M f 11 If fn, VH 4,� 4 �U ivi 4j VL 6.5 U . r� C) 1.5 i,t./ 40.e 2
1 C1 Z 4 t Z. I 1 0 M I L 20 L 1T 9 M ,804 Vti� 7 44 1 J M 4f VL 6.5 6.Y C . o f 3.4 4 J 3 7 .5 2.7
ISEE EXPLANATION ON HACK)
PARTWAL SIZE ANALYSIS
MANUA, So I LISLE Moiye-
SAMPLE PKrRATE SULFUR ZINC NESE [RON COPPER BORON EXCESS SALTS C"LORIDE UENUM
LIME SOIL
NUMBER NO3 S Ma Fe Cu RATE CI Mo TEST r
URE
-fo RATE "a -Co RATE spWO RATIF Q RATE pp*M6 RATE y
S RAIL I! T, ppeWRATE ppo ppw SAND
SILT CLAY
Mk,l I CV. It, I�UJ I, F PPLV kL,U L t !I N
r, P I,, W SM WS
le5lod, samoies one -U-144
a r rlakw—n 0 jh,1,Jy days alto, 10stirly,
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTUAAL LABORATORIES, INC,
C. tXNMAIN Jf)N,-,:;
C /277'RvW&'w C1�14,)

A G L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC
Whiteptne Road # RichmondVirginia 3 . ®4) 743-9401
@9')
SAMPLES Attu 1 4 ")
SENO submiT"T to
HOLLY R14,;', t--N6 S AIN GROWER0 ,60 BY: HOLLY °ARMS 1: I
ATTN: OI I TAYLUK
, 0 6 0 x 3�11
DATE OF t.E"MI I i; .� �� r �� � P AGL SOIL ANALYSIS
{ ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS POTASSIUM MAGNESIUM CALCIUM SODIUM PH cation PERCENT
MATTER_,.... : _...... _. __ ..,,.. __ .._ µ HYDRO ExchangeSASE SAT°URATMN03OMPUTED)
9 �.. �. �: __.._
77-
AMPLE Ea tWeijk Dray) N,,HC��.R.R m. .:, .� % % Go-
NUMBER C ' EEIU
Ca R O
NUMBER SATE Ilt IR pps(a P RATE ow" A RATE p m K FRAY, pp+� p WE ppm Co RATE ppm N w RiAI E PR ON me4fl 0 hC�yd lUilE
IS 1L ,'. � 1 :T2 VtI t V " I '39 h 5 "'tt � 43 L 6. o _ .. . .d i .R, 4Y.5 3.7
0 ��U14 ,R . `Lt d I a`li G H y r' "1 6 0 "06 vH 550 M 4 0 L . V' 0.1 J . . 3 33.1 .) J . 1 1.5 . RU
4 11U b j ` 5n Vtt� I Vt a4 F .d Vfit( 5540 ?1 4J L 0.5 o.i t�.4 4.1 Vie. ail. � IT.5 4.0
FI u z 1 Z. -:RIM 4 5 Vh N ri tt 4 L 30 Vh 7t.t � T V'"� t.` U.1 .`� . . :1 . . � .1
s
MA A, SOLUBLE PaMULYU• PARTICALSIZE ANALYSIS
NITRATE SULFUR ZINC IdR l IRCiR� GtMPPLG Uf7RCR EXCESS SALTS CHLORIDEDENUM
p S §A PLE LIME % � % % SUIT
MUSE 3 S CA EMrs Ea CRR $ RATE Ct AMA TEXTURE
ttt!Q3 __.� _ATE ..,m LAY
d pa 9 aaS RAY pp.r K� RctTR.��
�a� iGtaaSC pp�raRA�zRRA7I5 To WE pproaC.Ai&TK RiC�§TC maivat»kmplAip Rpm GlT#p.i pp.�RM,oRRp.ifC SAND SILT I G� .�.�_,�u«�.... ......
1 ,
:I roQwot aamp"ej 00y V' wo w"'pwjo 10it� [3 Say wel ar. u'.wmsit
& At S k�uP tlaa o91 to O F ly twY5 dQtit lo'O"g,
A A L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, , INC,
CeM A N jON
o
ca v
s��e,=u,;. �Gd ftiaTiPJ fi`s "JAitl'3i`a Mh+:R °t $.k 6�Y"ut'it l��=d�.�NGe �..?� isxaTr tE Pio ;+".t 1.�Ewt-+.eve tx�. «.,y '}c ki'r waar Av: OL hill "Y" Ti 4E.' H='S41AS nN 0µ9nt fly46 Y h,E. CCMU'k.FrY 0 Lf3s. Pt R ACRE �'�"Ub
t tad r [#.&LAP t,t,�;�E}s 6�tuF,R�Pa4 f4k.E Ma4,a: ».aa rm,.;vJ�6kI'dc'1Ylin:. r#., a'.l i�.z sN �ca.9 di „8&=}��4381 E.S$T '4U &kl.a, 6iC Va 4rtk R". ,t;
. -:. _ ... _.:. _ ..,.ue �...�. ..xb;.ai.,v_. aarvsmu.emx �»�s is t'L..�..�rv�.t+w..t]m.:.ma,be1._,•:s ,k ate.* Lx.v� _�

1 1 Whitepine Road Richmond Virginia
ALL) ` N 4 a ."
AMPL FSEND SuEIN1111
T0, HULLY FARMS j N MAI N GROWER P 0 — .ByHULLY :a RM'0' L MAIN
1TN: DAVID TAYU011
P 0 sox 613
ORGANIC e PUOSPHORU5 PUTA SIU t MAGNESIUM � CALCIUM SODIUM PR Cation
MATTER hEYbRUh Exchange BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
LAB
PT P K CIO 0 Na SULK; BUFFER CEN Cap atq
SAMPLE@@ N �. iw.,A Mail : N,�r�GOIP !� %NtIIR�SFR p LNR N C'Ex
NUMBER .a.S Ca R Na
ERATbl.rAaaRT.,,,,.._"m _p!!.RAlk pout M9 n,CaRATf uaaraaIATI pW 019 JTIIIR
�._,. _�.. ... rR. ._...� �L.x.
�iU - ..1 1 U4 El i^ is :,)0 H 1H SL 5 V fi 190 L � 6 VL 6. 1 6 , 1.1 3 . e 4.3 51.j 4 ta.Z 1 . 0 2.5
L I L d:;,.a Ji.1 6'-, 411 UI1 1 14 V 14!1 M V H,-' 1010 h 41 VL` 1.3 U.Q 13.6 15'41.2 0.0 1.5
f jt 4.0 U6111 H 56 Li 120 h 199 VH t 1.1 iM 10 L 6.4 6.9.t 1.4 4.3 33. 5 49.1 9.0 4.1
I � '
i
I
(SET: LXPLANA ION ON BACK)
h9ANCaA• SOLUBLE FLYS
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NITRATE SULFUR ZINC NFSE IRON COPPER BOVION EXCESS, SALTS CHLORIDE DENUM — j. .,_m.---_1— _ —
LI E % I a % SOIL
NUMBER 903 S za Non F* Cu U RATE CI Ma� IE�T RE
P +NiTdafa XE aP ^StiATE aAATI. ppm-MnRAU pp -"feRATE Wpoa-C.RATE ERATE Imb GRATE ## CI RATE foo-04RATf SAND $IL.T..�. xILA`P
»n... _..w_ ... ,.� LL
I
t, utttsvxP
VL
V d.+).e'x".
pq
I
..� h.143L F'k6 S b� P4€Ey fik .a4RL,C f#d &I CJ [3,AUy ..w;
-'fmr va:ax �r9 aaa a, m;xi fy t€r €na. q ,iav s+taut 8e.,.d%rw "i�sarlUs s a¢e mart ac�la�ca
A A L EASTERN rwAGRICULTUAAt. LASOAATOFUE , INC,
Ry

sokmpI F,
ACCI 4 kXq
I.Nad,4 SUBWf G ED
I-(, i LL o 8, � & MAIN G140u ERw P 0 BY: HA-LY F At.r i s" i.s MAIN
DAVID TAYLJR
P aox 16
ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS POTASSIUM MAGNESIUM CALCIUM SODIUM pII xtlzR PERCENT'
_,." _ HY RO- BASE SATURATION (COMPUTEER
LAIC MATTER PI P1 IC Mo CA GEN Exchafive
SOIL SUFfEIT
AMPLE � (wf,.k Sf ly) I�a1'rCO3T f, � Cplpaclty t� %
NONCIiE EAR » H F C
NCFDMELi ��.� ..m
RATE Ibs /A pp- A RATE ..: Own p RAIE ....._'p 9 x IIATE i p# MjAAII, PAM CA RATE.. _ pprso- aAATf p pp /ffi p M04/'1689 i U NA
I L A : „# 4.1 113CI 1 H � � � M 121 H Vii Iw 10 L 6 5, L 6 . 3 0.4 U. I 1. 51.0 � 14.5
F
u2 101, 1� 1 41.L v i e � M e � 4" ' vili 5 69 V H 1 U t,I) L 1 .0 U.1 11 .1 6. 9 42., _ 0. 2.f)
4»A #" M., ;X ' A 6 l : C, 'p S 105 4 E d 'tlM 0. Y R. 1 +N 0 G . U 9.1 2.8 . 8 M 10 . Zi
E
MANGA, SOLUOLL Nil ILY& PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE Cw1iRr4TF ULFUR ZINC NESE IRON COPPER BORON EXCESS SALTS CHLORIDE DENUMLIME
SOILN0
NUMBER
ap,�auTx�A�c PAA S So Ma Fe OR G RATE ICI n TEXTURE
$ DATE peat �a RATE ppca o RATE pp It RATE powty HATE Po RATE m sihm RATE pp •C# RATE pp a RAT SAND SILT Ct AY
i
� I
"9 t ti Aac a1s. apples Q,fiy to th. Sd t^tt.gcl WsUl'u tamwas 4r0 iata(iPed
d eSYu x8a 11 as i1 PMd tr.,tM ujy4 aftew ::G fttn
A A E EASTERN AGRICULTURAL. LABORATORIES, INC.
{r
............ ..... z_._ ,..,.....,..,.,.. .....F w._..... _, .I,.:,...._.... ,.. r_ _:,_ _..,_ ,,
a na;,sk, tS Hlkl iN— tti We k O'W i Fi § 3t u M aiF4 . 1.,1 ,. .,! @� 1 tI, tet ^' t' ktI .I t l „�. "�4,. I, ._ x$bi n... PAUt T C8w ➢it l'k k Ik,r v&). I PkY as T. t 0 k,k N4'k i}T 'y0 k BS Pt A'iC 8F. T'°44.11,
a C"4't F wk r ttt h m T'; fN opm fiw 2,4 TO i 1Pw51.i4" f t? R..t `..a e"LN dCVU, K-
_._...,W �a. s eou� r a...r,� a. �.a:u, r. ., ,.:_ ,,•E�."a *.,..;xt % i `i4'C$ti ��k'.2': Nc11f,S D 10PJdeE

RUIZ—U4U 7621 Whitepine Road * Richmond Virginia 23237 * [phone] RL
CC
APLI,
SEND SUBMITTED�
To ULLY FARM,i o, MAIN GROWER: c 01 f a Y. He-iLL,Y FARMS LN(a MAIN
r N: DAVID TAYLOR
6ex 6
W .. E aaxeO 4 N
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS POTASSIUM MAGNESIUM CALCRI4 SODIUM PH cation
. m ...... _._..._.._ _. m .. _-- NCI N• SASE SATURATION (f.'O a1PUTEIT¢
F�AT�EI3 ,,.._..a r. � _ E�ss:I���
LAB PI PT }6 14y C N GEE} �.
SAMPLE 1we44 814y) t�,tRC03 SI7t SL EP N C Iu III % % T6
NuMBE. i . 11ift SAT£ aww�a._.�..... r H C EC,
CaNUMIER ffib�,�A ���rRATE n�A��pR�IE PR#RAT€ p�ERAtE pc�a��ArE N � ttII4 Raall34
a;
r � i
(SCE EXPLANATION ON RACK)
Ea9A NOa A- SOLUBLE MCF L'Y S
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLENITRATE SULFUR ZINC NESE IRON COPPER 80"ON EXCESS SALTS EHLORIDE ISENU _ I._.�_.
LIME
m ..
g W) S des A E CRR ATE CI Ma SOILNLIII ETi TEXTURE
RA
p na 401 N1E p.R w4 RATE p,Zo RATE pp Ma RATE P " Ea RATE Ep v RATE : 4 RATE
r � mh#ol'' RATE wa+-ER RATE PRAT£ SANE) SILT" CLAY
9 ai € rra„oma nprrtEmt aavvgy fbr ar.a ,airs, pit" �.aMares sra r6e4 ,arod
A IE L P YCtT A NI LTLTLIFfiAL tt IT tiITIES, I
l LB FYeA 1"$Na".s VkiP Y te. Ni VLI, Ll:••:+':0 "i,it l: "e,e.a=e,t..fq •t, .w`'d, as dt ti ... hh4d4.8IPLY N 4v3',.. R SS.ALTS F t l ltPM tilt 4,6 TO 9.ONVk UT TO LUs P'Lw, 4,Fdk I` Cay
„raa i 6hfitTT' ci T^>a1 R'btiJ�a E,PY m?: a P P ,'F€
�.e��srl ...°, k2vJ k, ,' I 5:. € :.rfl I'Po
ll, Ei'r 5 7= 1"o T llU at i° i➢ k„S h^€.ikr Fae:"El' a£.�'.'s

REPORT U Ups
LABORATORIES
AUIO-U4L
7621 1 "HITEPINE
RD. RICHMOND VA.23237 04-743-9401
SEND
TO.
HOLLY F A ,c i
°i i"A i is
CUSTOMER
ACCI rt45346
AVNI: DAVID TA YL04?
P ".: - 0'id
rI
P i f
SAMPLES
rom S: , C q 0
NC e
SUBMITTED
By: i W_i f k : jai r, tad
DATE P REPORT � � � „ �
PAGE t
SAIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE
AU
Nitrogen phru «
phoru
a urttlt�u t eng -
Patel i
itii Mrera
SulfurCalcium slum noslu ti Sod� nose
,�rttrrtente Nitrate
Copper in
pp Nitrogen Nitrogen
IDENT
NO:
% ° P"
�
, R � U QUA %Mgpptrt Pe ppt AWN
ppmCu palls n PPui ppm
A
10243
140
32 55
{44
252
I
A
10245
1001
18 51
P5
145
92&
28 3
10247
781
28 40
LAB
Cadmium Cure-
mium
Mickel Lead
t�rgerlt
Arsenio Mercury Selenium
Nitrogen
NO.
pan d ppCr
pp Ni pp, Pb
ppr A pp g pp a
143
'.
5 2
10244
<0 5
5 1
10245
0 5
5 15
10246
<0.5
5 5
Valuos on this
roport art the total
mount of the sampt
,
Our reports and lattara are tear iha oxchonwa and
confiadnnal uaa of our olionts, and may not be roproducird to whole or to part, not may any reference be made
This report applies only to the sample(s) lost ad, Samples its
to the work, the raar>lls, or Ilia company in any advertising, newts ralaaaa,
or other public announcements without obtaining our prior wrrittan anthrui ati n.
retained At maximum of thirty days attar tasting:
(A(,
A 4 t, EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
.I. la Ph.D.
C

REPORT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
ILA
SEND
ftmL
TO:
H 0 L L Y F A k
t N' t 'I A I i�, CUSTOMER
A C T 4
4 5 j 4')
P 0 sox 68
SAMPLES
vJ1L'KL';!i�1,0RU
NC Zb6i'l(
SUBMITTED
DATE REPORT� , �
c{OTyg ANALYSIS
PAGE SOILREPORT
SAMPLE
LA
Tirtr �k Phis- t s� , Sulfur Calcium µ Sodium Iron AluminumMen
rus um noslutrf n s
Copperzincitlti�kt fii t�ttrst
Nitrogen NitrogenNitrogenn
I P
NO,h
� �s PPS IMP At
E� K : T�IYF :..
Pp Mn
n
Cuppm PPS P
rn.. PPP
10248
35
15 4
0
10249
77931
35
5
10250
335
23 3
10251
343
26 4
G
10252
4G
29 53
LAB
�tdmiui' tkr
rtstukri
rii
Mickel Lead Arsenic Mercury S leniur Organic
Nitrogen
III
P aI RpmCr
f�P lit larrt Pbrn As
10248
1 <0.5
5 30
114
.5
5 1
10250
< 0.5
5 10
105
0.5
5 30
52
0.5
5 35
Valuos on this report art the betel
' mount of the sampi ,
Our ropods and tartars are tear aril exclusive and
confiedrifial use of rarer ctidnt , and may not be rafrnadocadin whole or in port, near may any reforonca be made
This f8projapplioS only ko the satrtpio(sl taxi . Samples are
to kh,r work, tho t,&4uits
of the company to any
advertising, news release, or other public, announcomanis without obtaining our prior written authorization,
retained a maximum of thirty days attar tasting.
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LA130RATORIES INC.
by
�. � �:�' t I'•� �. it d'M:
Paul .:t d . Chu, Ph.D.".

REPORT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
8U i -(J4 i
7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237 4-743-94 1
EN
6 C X is d
SAMPLES
,W1LKLS,W,'Z0
NC 18697
UBMITTED
Y
RATE OF REPORT �w° .'
PAGE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE
LA
Nitrogen pkt - �' tSulfur Mutts � odium
Iron AluminuManm
�
Copper inn �tirttrrtnnN Nitrate
i E T.
N�
photos lure nn tum,
Nei % �
tprn En ppm At
mesa
Nitrogen Nitrogen
pprrt Cif ppm n
1-
10253
05
33 41
10254
122
21 5
10255
164
26 34
L
1256
432
59 11
10257
577
45 68
LAB
Cadmium hro-
r tium
Nickel Lead Arsenic Mercury rtium Organic
Nitrogen
pptff d pprnCr
pp Ni pprrt Pbpprrt pp pprra So
1 253
0.5
5 15
10254
<0.5
5 15
10255
� w 5
5 5
10256
0.5
10 35
1025
5
10 1
Values aan thsa
ra rt arq the total
' mount at the eai �rpl
Our refxc its and Irrtturs Are for the exclusive and conf8edrund teas of rrur clients, and may not be reprraducad to wu la or in part, not may any reference be made
This report applies only to the satrtrpleN i tested arnmes are
to the wotir, the trrsuns,
or the company in any
advertising, no s taleasel,tar other pub t6c rtnouncanrestte a lthttut �t ain n our prior written authorization,
ratamad a maximum of thirty days after i ling,
caul
L EASTERN A rNRN NJLT RAL LABORATORIES INC.
try
i�ii�i
.r

a ces
I N C 0 R R 0 R A T E 0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE A3$URAKCE OF allALIff
Holly Farms Foods December 04, 1990
P.O. Box 88 PACE Project
1600 River Road Number: 601101503
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Attn: Mr. Danny Wyatt
PACE Sample Number: 92 0545109 92 0545117
Date Collected: 10/31/90 10/31/90
Date Received: 11/01/90 11/01/90
Stick H2O Stick H2O
Parameter Units MOL 1&2 10-31 1&2 10-31
(1)
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Cadmium mg/kg 0.260 NO -
Calcium mg/kg 2.63 908 -
Chloride mg/kg 26.3 5815 -
Chromium mg/kg 0.657 1.61 -
Copper, mg/kg 0.260 50.0 -
Lead mg/kg 2.63 NO -
Magnesium mg/kg 2.63 234.2 -
Nickel mg/kg 0.530 3.684 -
Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/kg 1.32 3368 -
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl mg/kg 1.32 33816 -
Nitrogen, Nitrate mg/kg 2.63 NO -
Nitrogen, Nitrite mg/kg 0.105 3.87 -
Phosphorus, Total mg/kg 0.53 22816 -
Plant Available Nitrogen, by calculation mg/kg 2.63 9637 -
Potassium mg/kg 0.260 1274 -
Sodium mg/kg 0.260 1574 -
lids, Percent Total % 0.01 3.,8 -
Sulfate mg/kg 26.3 658 -
Zinc mg/kg 1,320 29.7 -
pH 0.1 4.21 -
TCLP METALS
Arsenic mg/L 0.050 - NO
Barium mg/L 0.050 - 2.69
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.
MDL Method Detection Limit
NO Not detected at or above the MDL.
1700 Univenify Commicief Mete Offices Serving: Sri is, mifflescits Los Angew, California An Equal Opportunity EMP10YOV
Chatiotte, NC 28213 Tarnp, Fiorillo Charloac North Carolina
TEL: [phone] low$ city, Iowa Ashovifie, North Catefioa
FAX: 704-597,8455 Sot Ffamisco, cafifoonia New nark, New York
Kansas City, Missouri piltsbur2h, pormylvaris

4
paces
` it R F 0 R A T' E ti
THE ASSURANCE at GUALI IT
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 04, 1990
Page 2 PACE Project
Number: 60110150
PACE Sample umber: 92 0545109 92 054511
Date Collected: 10/ 1/90 10/ 1/90
Date Received: 11/01/9011/01/90
Stick H2O Stick H2O
Parameter' Units MDL l&2 10- 1 lit ; 10- 1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP METALS
Cadmium mg/L 0.010 - NO
Chromium mg/L 0.025 NO
Lead mg/L 0.10 - ND
Mercury mg/L 0.0005 NO
Selenium mg/L 0.050 - NO
Silver m /L 0.010 - NO
ORGANIC' ANALYSIS
TCLP PESTICIDES
-OHC (Li dare) u9/L 0.002 - 0.34
Endri ug/L 0a00 - NO
Nethexychler ug/L 5`•0 - NO
TeaRhee ug/L 1-.0 - NO
Chlordane ug/L 0.10 N
Heptachlor ug/L 0.001 ` - 1.9
TCLP CHLOROPHENO YS
,4-0 ug/L I - NO
Sil e ug/L I - NO
1 All analysis performed on Toxin Characteristic Lea hate
DL Method Detection Limit
NO Net detected at or above the MDL
1700 University Cammencial Place Offices S itg: Minnospolis, Minnesota Us Angeles, California An Equal Opportunity Employer
Caailatte. NC 28213 Tampa. Florida Charlotte, North Carolina
TEE: 704- 97-A464 Iowa City. hma Asheville, North Carolina
FAX' 704"507 5455 San Francisco, California New York, Now ''fora
Kansas City. Missouri Fitiallurgh, perevylvaris

PI N
T14E ASSURA149E OF dUA1.11Y
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 04, 1990
Page 3 PACE Project
Number: 601101503
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA'or other
approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under
my supervision.
Charles M. Cabaniss
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
Stimus
Manager, Organic Chemistry
1700 University Commercial Place Wines Saying: momeopok minnatote Los Angeles, California An Equal Onortunity Eavloyer
Minim, NC 28213 Tampa, Florkis chadalm Nmth Carolina
TEL. 704M7-804 Iowa city, laws Ashoadle, North Carolina
W: 704-597-8455 San Frw4sce. California Navy Yark New Yolk
Kansas City: Missouri Filtswo. pemsylvatria

THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Holly Farms 'Foods December 04, 1990
P.U. Box 88 PACE Project
1600 River Road Number: 601026504
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Attn: fir, Danny Wyatt
PACE Sample Number. 92 0543947 92 0543955 92 0543963
Date Collected: 10/ 5/9 10/` 5/9 10/ 5/9
Date Received 1 / /9 1 / 6/90 10/ 6/9
Harmony Harmony Rr edon
Parameter Units HUL UAF Sludge DAF Sludge UAF Sludge'
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Cadmium mg/kg 0.013 0.020
Cadmium mg/kg0.00 - - ND
Calcium mg/kg 1.0 - - 3,7
Calcium mg/kg 1.3 6 -,
Chloride mg/kg 10 4656
Chloride mg/kg 3.4 - - 41
Chromium mg / kg 0.010 -- 0.089
Chromium mg/kg 0.130 0.17 -
Copes mg/kg 0.025 - 0.17
Copper mg/kg 0.033 1.
Lead mg/kg 0.130 2.94 -
Lead mg/kg 1.0 - R N
Magnesium mg/kg 0.100 .96
Magnesium mg/kg 0.130 10.4
Nickel mg/kg 0.013 0.156
Nickel mg/kg 0.020 - 0.04
Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/kg 0.17 m - 1454
Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/kg 0.5 44 _,
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl mg/kg .17 - - 9181
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl mg/kg 045 354
Nitrogen, Nitrate erg/kg 0.34 _ - NU
Nitrogen, Nitrate mg/kg NU'
Nitrogen, Nitrite mg/kg .0140 - NO
Nitrogen, Nitrite mg/kg 04 ND a
( ) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachater
MOIL Method Detection Limit
NU Not detected at or above the IUL-
1700 University Commercial Place Offices SerV4, mireteapoks, miftnasola Los Angeles, Califattes An Equal Opportunity Employer
Gharlotte, NG 28213 Tama, Florida Charlotte, Norlb Coeur
7 L 704. S7•84 4 Iowa City, tows Asheville. North Carolina
FAX: [phone] San Framisco, Cali€ntnta Now York, Now York
Kansas City, wissouri PittsburIgh. Pennsylvania

pt,D R P
THE ASSUAANCE OF allALITY
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 04, 1990
Page 2 PACE Project
Number: 601026504
PACE Sample Number: 92 0543947 92 0543955 92 0543963
Date Collected: 10/25/90 10/25/90 10125/90
Date Received: 10/26/90 10/26/90 lo/26/90
Harmony Harmony Breeden
Parameter Units MDL DAF Judd e 28LIlud2e p8f _11 udqe
INORGANIC ANALYSIS (1)
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Phosphorus, Total mg/kg .070 - - 758
Phosphorus, Total mg/kg 0.21 7781 - -
Plant Available Nitrogen, by calculation mg/kg Oa3 - - 2804
Plant Available Nitrogen, by calculation mg/kg 10 9000 - -
Potassium mg/kg 0.10 - - 3.09
Potassium mg/kg 0.130 12.6 - -
Sodium mg/kg 26 146 - -
Sodium mg/kg 8.5 - - 4.10
Solids, Percent Total % 0.1 9.6 -
Sulfate 29.3
Sulfate mg/kg 10 3125 - -
Zinc mg/kg 3.4 - - 341
mg/kg 0.05 - - 0.614
Zinc mgg 0.65 2.94 - -
pH 0.1 6.36 - 5.21
TCLP METALS
Arsenic mg/L 0.050 - ND
Barium mg/L 0.50 - 1.47
Cadmium mg/L 0.010 - ND
Chromium mg/L 0.025 - ND
Lead mg/L 0.10 - ND
Mercury mg, L 0.0005 - ND
Selenium mg/L 0.050 - ND
Silver mg/L 0.010 - ND
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
1700 University commerew piece Offices Serving: mirmapdm memscia Los Angeles. Caffortria An Equal Opporturaty Employer
Charlotte, MC
Charlotte, Tanva, FWW* Charlotte, North Carrifin
TEL: 704a5974454 Iowa City, Iowa Asheville, North Carolina
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, California Now York, New York
Kansas City, Missouri Pittsburgh, Perwisyfwartia

pace.
THE A$sURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 04 I990
Page 3 PACE Project
Number. 60IC26504
PACE Sample Number: 92 0543947 92 0543955 92 0543963
Date Collected. I 25 10/25 '9 1 /25/9
Cate Received. 10/26 90 10/26, 90 1 26/99
Harmony Harmony Breedon
Parameter Units M L D F SJjqqe DAF Sludge AF Sludge
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP PESTICIDES
g-R L Linda a ug/L 0.002 - ND
Endri ug , 0.007 M
Mathxychlu ugL 5, -
Tuxahrla ugL I. MC
Chlordane ugL 0.10
Heptachlor ug 0.001 - ND
TCLP CMLORCP EMC YS
2,4-C ugL 1 - 24
Sit ugL I - ND }
1All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.
M L Method Detection Limit
E Not detected at or above the MIL.
1700 University Commercial Place Of fim setyin#; minnespok, minveseta Los Anplas, Cahfairris An Equal OpporturitY Cate later
Charlotte, NC 28213 Torthra, Sorids Char tte, North Camlitta
to 704•5744 Iowa City, Iowa Asheville: North Car fas
FAX: 704M)`14 h soft Ftrowisco, cafifornsir Now York{ Now ratit
Karns" Cult. Missouri piltswookytv

pace. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSUIRANct Of QUAWT
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 04, 1990
Page 4 PACE Project
Number: 601026504
PACE Sample Number: 92 0543971
Date Collected: 10/25/90
Data Received: 1090
Breedon
Parameter Units MDL DAF Sl
iydg—e
-7T)
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP METALS
Arsenic mg/L 0.050 ND
Barium mg 0.50 1.34
Cadmium lag /L 0.010 ND
Chromium mg/L 0.025 ND
Lead mg/L 0.10 ND
Mercury mg/L 0.0005 ND
Selenium mg/L 0.050 ND
Silver mg/L 0.010 ND
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP PESTICIDES
9-BHC (Lindane) ug/L 0.002 ND
Endrin ug/L 0.007 ND
Methoxychlor ug/L 5.0 ND
Toxaphene ug/L 1.0 ND
Chlordane ug/L 0.10 ND
Heptachlor ug/L 0.001 0.17
TCLP CHLOROPHENOXYS
2,4-D ug/L I NO
Silvex ug/L I ND
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MOL.
1700 University CGMff*fCnn Place Officts Sol*q: Nfinneepoks, mimwsots Los Angeots. California An Equal Opportmity Employer
Charlotte, NC 28213 Tompe, Florida Chadolte, North Carolina
TEL [phone] law# City, Iowa Asheville, North Carefins
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, cafifefflis Now York, New York
Its City Missmi Pittsburgh, Peonsylvaris

pN'�
C R R R 5 R A I E
THf ASSURANCE Of MUALITY
r. Danny Myatt December 04, 1990
Page 5 PACE project
Number: CICSC
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other
G
approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under
my supervision.
Charles M. Ca aniss
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
Jelin T. Stimus
Manager, Organic Chemistry
1700 University Commercial a oftex arq. mirvaAW4. Kawats Cos Aolties, Calilornis A4 Equal Gpawtvoily Einlriatot
Charlotte, NBC 28213 ieeapa, FirwhIs Charlotte, North Catalina
TEE: 704.557. 4 4 low# city, low# AshaviRe North Car
FAX. 704�5 7 $4 5 San ffemivm CaNlf rraa New Yet , New 7w
5 as W Misswri pittlimugh, pennsylvainut

P, REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE Of 4UAW1
Holly Farms Foods December 05, 1990
P.O. Box 88 PACE Project
1600 River Road Number: 601030500
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Attn: Mr. Danny Wyatt
PACE Sample Number: 92 0544293 92 0544307 92 0544315
Date Collected: 10/29/90 10/29/90 10/29/90
Date Received: 10/30/90 10/30/90 10/30/90
Harmony Harmony Wilkesboro
Chlorine Chlorine Sludge
Parameter Units MOL Basin Basin DAF
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Cadmium mg/kg 0.045 - - 0.045
Cadmium mg/kq 0.320 0.613 - -
Calcium mg/kg o.45 - - 151.1
Calcium mg/kg 3.23 3323 - -
Chloride mg/kg 32 4645 - -
Chloride mg/kg 4.5 - - 959
Chromium mg/kg 0.113 - - 2.00
Chromium mg/kg 0.806 6.677 - -
Copper mg/kg 0.045 - - 70.6
Copper mg/kg 0.320 46.45 - -
Lead mg/kg 0.45 - - ND
Lead mg/kg 3.22 35.2 -
Magnesium mg/kg 0.45
Magnesium mg/kg 3.20 732 - -
Nickel mg / kg 0.090 - - 1.98
Nickel m-/kq 0.645 5.871 - -
Nitrogen, Amon i a mg/kg C. - - 2099
Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/kg 1.61 1797 - -
Nitrogen, Kldahl mg/kg 0.23 - - 38914
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl mg/kg 1.61 78387 - -
Nitrogen, Nitrate mg/kg 0.45 - - NO
Nitrogen, Nitrate mg/kg 3.23 ND -
Nitrogen, Nitrite mg/kg 0.02 - - NO
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachat
e.
MOL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
I I act University Commercial Place offices Serviv mawnt"ofis, minnesdia Lot Angeles, CaRfornia An Equal Opportunity Employer
Charlotte. NC 28213 TwVa, Florida Charlotte. North Carolina
TEL. [phone] Iowa City, lowEr Asheville, North Caref na
FAX: [phone] San trancisca, Cafilatris New York, New York
Kansas City, Mwouri pittstualih, ftmeyfirenis

THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY _.
r. Danny Wyatt December CS, 1990
Page 2 PACE Project
Number: 60I03500
PACE Sample Number: " 92 0544293 92 0544307 92 0544315
Date Collected: 10/29/90 10/29/90 10/29/90
Date Received. 1 /3C/9C 10/30/90 10/3 /9
Harmony Harmony Wilkesboro
Chlorine Chlorine _ Sludge
Parameter~ Units` NNL Bashi Basin NAF
INORGANIC ANALYSIS 1
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Nitrogen, Nitrite mg/kg 0W129 3.87
Phosphorus, Total mg/kg .CS 6258 - T
Phosphorus, Total mg/kg 0.09 - 164
Plant Available Nitrogen, by calculationmg/kg 0.45 - - 10461
Plant Available Nitrogen, by calculation mg/kg 3.22 222 _ -
Potassium mg/kg 0.045 - - 19
Potassium mg/kg 0.322 1848 -
Sodium mg/kg 0.045 - - 190
Sodium mg/kg ,3 3290
Solids, Percent Total 0.01 3. - 22.1
Sulfate mg/kg 32:3 1613
Sulfate mg/kg 4. - 679
Zinc mg/kg 0.045 - - 12.9
Zinc mg/kg 1.610 109.
PN 0.1 6.83
PN 0m10 - - 4.75
TCLP METALS
Arsenic mg/L 0.050 NO
Barium mg/L 0.050 .966
Cadmium mg/L 0.1 - NO -
Chromium mg/L 0.025 - 0.025
Lead m/L 0.10 - NC_
Mercury mg/L 0.0005 - NO
Selenium mg/L 0.10 - NO
Silver mg/L 0.1 - N
1) All analysis Performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate
NL Method Detention Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL
Data subject to final' review,
1700 University commertnal Piece Offices Sartir g: Mkmeapoft, Minnesota Las Amphis, CaliforniaAn Equal OppipTurtity Employer
Charlotte, NC 28213 nmqias FloWs Charlotte„ North catorms
TEL [phone] lovint City a; Asher , North Caralats
FAk 704,597 8455 San Francisco, Cafiforras Now York.how York
K as City, misswo Nusbutgh, Pmrsylvarsa

Ce. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE Of SUALITY
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 05 A 1990
Page 3 'PACE Project
Number: 601030500'
PACE Sample Number: 92 0544293 92 0544307 92 0544315
Date Collected: 10/29/90 10/29190 10/29/90
Date Received: 10/30/90 10/30/90 10/30/90
Harmony Harmony Wilkesboro
Chlorine Chlorine Sludge
Parameter Units MDL Basin Basin DAP
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP CHLOROPHENOXYS
2,4-D ug/L I -1.1
Silvet ug/L 1 - NO -
TCLP PESTICIDES
g-BNC (Lindane) ug/L 0.002
Endrin ug/L
Methoxychlor ug/L S. - ND -
Toxaphene ug/L 1.0 - NO -
Chlordane ug/L 0.10 - ND -
Heptachlor ug/L 0.001 - ND -
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Lea hate
MOL Method Detection Limit
NO Not detected at or above the L.
1700 University Commercial Place officas Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Los Angeles, California Art Equal OpporturkY ERVICYOr
Charlotte, NC 28213 TwMa, Florida Chadatta, North Carolina
TEL: 704,591-8454 laws 0% lows Ashevillit, North Cam fina
FAX; 704-597-8455 San Francisco, California New York, New York
Kaness City, hilli Pittsburgh, pewsylvonis

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
pcice.
THE tSSURANCr Of OUAlt7r
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 05 1990
Page 4 PACE Project;
Number: 601030500
PACE Sample Number: r 92 0544323
Data Collected: 10/ /gg"
Date Received: 103C/' C
Wilkesboro
Sludge
Parameter Units M L DAP
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP METALS
Arsenic g/L 0.10 N
Barium g/L 0.050 2.00
Cadmium tg/L 0.010 NO
Chromium atg/L 0.035 N
Lead mg/L 0.10 Nil
Mercurytag/L 0.0005 NO
Selenium g/L 0.10 NO
Silver g/L 0.010 Ng
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP CHLOROPHENOXYS
4- ug/L I NO
Silver ug/L 1 1.
TCLP PESTICIDES
g-5 C Lindan ug/L 0.002 g
Lndrin ' ug/L 0.00N
Mthnychlnr ug/L- 5.0 Ng,
Tuaphnn ug/L 1.0 ND
Chlordane ug/L 0.10 ND
Heptachlor ug/L 0.001 Ng
1 All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.
MOL Method Detection Limit
Ng Not detected at or above the M L®
Data subject to final review.
1700 University Commmial Puce afftes arviug; Nfiwwzpoka mimosets Los Angeles, Cater is An Equal Opwturuly Employer
Madam, NC 252 13 Tampa, Rorktio Chmrtati , North Carotin
TEL 704•5 7.5454 towis City, Iowa Asheville, North C r ` 4
FAX, 704,597,8455 Carr Francisco, Catit rrwak New York Now YAik
Kantsit City, Missouri Pittsburgtr. Pennsylvania

pace.
REPORT OF LABOMTORY ANALYSIS
cr
THE ASSURANtf OF OUALI TY
Mr. Danny Wyatt December 05, 1990
Page 5 PACE Project
Number: 601030500
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other
approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under
my supervision.
Charles M. Cabaniss
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
John T. Stimus
Manager, Organic Chemistry
1700 University Commercial flace Offices Se"irw. Mk"Spok» Wm"Mto Lee Angeles, California Ao Equal Oppottatity Employer
Charlotte, NC 282 13 Tao". Fkaids Charlotte. North Carolina
TEL: [phone] tMa City, lowsr Asher a, North Cortifes
FAX: [phone] Son Fr " aP California Kow York, Raw York
Karm" City, Missouri frittowo, periftsylvaras

FEE-14--'91 THU 1: ID:PACE LPROPATCPIES T L N s, —5977—
REPORT OF LASOMTORY ANALYSIS
PTNI
A11u��f
Mc1 s Foy February 14�, 1
P.O.sox PACE Project Number., 111
1600 River Road
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Attn:r DannyWyatt
Sle 2 000615112 4i 51
Date Col Number: 1 1 9 1 1 1
Date ec i Breeden
STICK
Parameter Units MOL $f udge WATER
SUBCONTRACT ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Moisture t1 93.6
A
INORGANIC AL
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Cadmium 'k ...1
Calcium mg/kg 1.50 347.5
Chloride / kg 1.
Chromicm mg/ko 0.15.
Copper mg/kq 0.154.1
Lead mgJkq 1 6
Nitrogen, Kja1 0
.
Nitrogen, Nitrate k 1.6 67.2
Nitrogen, Nitrite g 0.06 0.18
Oil and Grease mg/kg120
Phosphorus Total mglkg 0.02 1630 -
Plant Avaiiable Nitrogen, by calculation mg/kq 0.06 13243
Potassiummg/kg .0
$odium mg/kg 15.0 943.3
Solids, Percent Total % 0.1
Sulfate kg 15.0 1007
Zinc mg/kg mg/kg0.15 .4
P
0.1 5.41
I Method Detection Limn_
1700 Uniarvity ComweW PWO 0ftrs fiVIM: a al Ut Anqqwln NIHON# AA f4al = yv

FEE-°° 1 —1 i THU 1 2 D FACE LASORATCRIES T L : 704- S7— Z
rDanny Wyatt February 14, 1991
Page 2 PACE ProJect r. 610118604
ANumber:
Date Cod ct �=8reoden
I I 1
Data * iit j' 1123 1
- STICK
Parameter Units MOL Sludge
_77—
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
7LF METALS
Arsenic g L O.2S NO N
Barium L 5.0 NO NO
CadmiumL 0.05 NO NO
Chromium L 0.25 NO NO
Lead mg/L 0.25 NO NO
Mercury L 0.01 NO ND
Selenium mq L 0.05 NO NO
Silver L 0.25 ND NO
ORGANIC,ANALYSISTCLP VOLATILES By GC/MS
Carbon tetrachloride mg,/L 0.050 NO NO
C I orob nz n L 10 NO No
Chloroform L 0.60 NO NO
1,4 ithl r n n L 7.5 NO NO
Mathyl ethyl ketone mg/L 20 NO NO
1,1,2,24 c 1oroethy ens L
tr nrnnt yin mg L 0.070
Vinyl chloride L 0,020 NO
Vinyl chlorideL 0,07
I, ichloro than L O.S
All analysis performed on Toxic L t
L Method ` Detection Limit
NO Not detected at or above the MDL.
Aft ,l CoWhoft L410

FEES--14— 91 TLC 1 :2? ID-PPCE
LABGRA70RIES ..._ T ?
NO:704-597-845S
#038 POS
N`CQ�EQ
r, Danny Wyatt
REPORT
OF LABORATORY
February
ANALYSIS
14, 1991
Page 3
PACE Project Number: 610118SO4
CC S m l Numbers
CC6a1 C
00
t Col ct `,
01 1 91
1 21 1
Date Received;
01/18/91
01/23/91
rtedeft
STICK
Parameter
n
u a
A
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP ACID
rtho-rep l
g,
04
NO
NO
to Cr sol
L
200
NO
NO
r&-Cr sol
'L
200
NO
ND
e tachlor l
g/L
1i
NO
NO
-inch c henol
L
40
O
NO
,4,_richlr h nod
2
initr ' l n
L
0.13
NO
ND
14-
H#xachlorobenzenaL
0.13
Hexathloroathansg
ND
NO
itroban
Pyridine
mq�L
5
50.5
NO
NO
achl crc ut i en
L
NO
NO
P
i
NO
NO
TCLP PESTICIDES
- NC Lin
/
4
n r
NI}
NO
the chlcr
L
1C
oxa hey
L
C
NO
ND
Chlordane
0.0030
atachl r
L
0.0009
NO
NO
Natachl or spoxide
mg/L
0.0008
NO
NO
1All analysis Performed
on Toxic Characteristic
L
acha. e.
L Mothod Detection Limit
NO Not t cte t or above the MOL.
I70 V*wy CMMVCw fts
0*iMts, SC 21111
Offices + M Ott s Angtial.O c
Ta"Va, flWuha6wt, Mwtk 0 . #
An Wel 4WuMY 11T
TEL ia+�g3l> at
t l Oa x 1 1 0 5
814 C"iNvil Now YA N

FEEB-14—'91 THU 18:27 IMPACE LASCRATORTES TEL NOs704-597—e4S5 #038 P06
ANALYSIS
ttxaros Guar
Mr, Danny Wyatt
REPORT OF
LABORATORY
February 14, 1991
Page 4
PACE Project Number., 610118504
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other
approved methodologies. All analyses were
performed by
me or under
my supervision.
Charles N. Cabaniss
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
Manager, organic Chemistry
1700 Ww4fty emnere-4114m offal streiq
mkmoak, mimmou
T" Florida
W A"$. Cant amit
C)rpriolts, MGM GM01%
OW10% RC 2#213
TV4 104-074444,
Iowa M. low#
A OWAL Rofth CWO*4
FAX: 104-641,9455
$,a Jfv44r*� CaRfmit
Ntw York N** YWk

THE 4SS0RAkt1 OF OUAWY
Holly Farms Foods February 05, 1991
P.C. Box 88 PACE. Project umber: 610130500
1600 River Plod
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Attn: Mr. Danny Wyatt
PACE Sample Number: 92 0009762 92 000977092 0009789
Cate Collected; 1/29/91 01/ 9 91 01 9 91
Date Received: 91 3 91, 01/3 '91 1/36 91
Harmony Harmony Wilkesboro
CL2 Basin DAF CAF
Parameter Grits ML Sl d e Sludge 51 ude
1MCPCAIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Oil and Crease m9L 1. 300 26400 1600
MCL Method Detection Limit
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other
approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by ate or under
my supervision.
Charles M. Cabaniss
Manager, inorganic Chemistry
1790 University Commercial place
Charlotte„ NC '78213
TEL: [phone]
FAk 704,597,8455
8ffwes Serving: minnesparls, mi escta
Tampa, flontla
laws City, laws
San Francisa, California
Kansas City, Missouri

nEPORT NUMBE13
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
4
u I IL _U4L
7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237 804-743-9401
SC
PiL
SAMPLES
NC ie­5VZ
SUl13MITT1
M;m LY rA.'?V' ; '
5f;11L ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE�.
ho - Dotes.
Nitrogen
Sulfur IIfrrrf g-
It Iran Irrflfrrrft�
Mange.
arlrrtmonir Nitrate
err ��t
li .
NO. _
N , rrt turn
� rt rrr
� N rrt rrr AlCu
f
rrr Ufa Nitrogen Nitrogen
h
10258
1182
10259
389
46 5
10260
205
33 90
1261
270
29 16
10262
164
26 76
L
hrt-
Cadmium r
rrtau
Nickel Lead Arsenic ni
Organic
Mercury Selenium
l�itr n
:
N
m
r Ni re,Pb rrr
rrt H g
10258 -
0.5
5
1025
.5
10 15
125
<.5
5 11
10261
0.5
5 65
122
a 5
4 5 30
Values an fhls report ' arf the total
amount rag the sarnpl
0or reports and taattara are tor the exclusive and coot uirdlal use of our Ptftrnte, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, not may any rateran a be made
This report applies only to the sample(s) lasted, Sammas are
to ttma Wale, time re-SWIS, or the uornpany to any aadvItitisin , maws release, or rather put lic anotruntam rtte without obtaining *ut prior written authorization,
re idnital a
maximum of thirty bays sass resort ,
U EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.

t REPORT NUMBERA
& L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
r1toIe-04t
SEND
j
TO,
L L Y F ANi
S a to I N' CUSTOMER
ACCT 4
4 S 34
TN: 0AV11
VA L01t 1' 0 #Em-30
Is U box 1318
yy[g g qq� r,,,,,, ��yy 1�yy
q 9 f
SUBMITTED
B 6 xi
TE L t - 0 "1 Ill
PAGE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
PLE LA
Nitrogen F�1tu - p t - Sulfur Calcium Sodium 1r
Aluminum
Mange-
Copper zinc Ammonia Nitrate
IDENt NO.
phoru slum rt lur
%N %S ppm p
pp Al
Rose
Nitrogen Nitrogen
ppCu pmn ra
p � g
pp
pp pp
10263
222
41 74
10264
189
72 52
LAB Cadmium rrs-
Nickel Lead Arsenic Mercury Selenium rttt
rrtt rrt
NO, pp pprrlCr
Nitrogen
prrt Ni pprrr Pbpptrt pp ppm so
10263 < 5
5 55
10264 5
5 35
VaWas on this report art the tonal
amount of the sampt
to reports anti 9attaars ara for the extlusiva and confiedruiat use of our clients,, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any rotarance be mad :
T t,% report a pli only to the sample(s) tasted, Samplas are
to tho work, lha thta company in any
advertising, news release, or other public ntt�t` menu walthout obtainingour prior written a thor`txation;
retained m ximui tat thirty days after testing,
L EAR T RN A GRICULTU A L LABORATORIESINC.
PaulC.H. Chu, Ph,
By
T. � .

Sludgerya
Application/Disposal
ReportApplication/DiForm
Annual Loading Summary
PPlication
l
Application
Mudge
dotal Gallons
Meta s and Nutrient Loading,
*Total. DrY Tons Nirrogen s r s
i s/acre
Application
Gallons Per Acre
Dry "Tans Per Acre . .fit,
as
G opper in
Date
W
0,,47
S011"- PR
annuallyUal
solids
n
..
Cad na
i
i
i

A
040.1
PUV p o "
000
�00' ) 0. 0 0'0
1-
i
SUOT�
snao P
� ,Psi
lug
P
��s�
� `��c�� �5� Ts
as ra
xz uO TIVOTTddy
P Pla
P"I Tvnuuy
of aaodald
TvsodsT(r/UOT2v-3TTddVP'l

Sludge Land Application/Disposal
Report Form
Annual Loading sumnary
_
+ pl..icati.. n Me r-h
1
Sl d a Application
Sludge
Total Gallons
**Total
Metals and Nutrient Loading.
Dry Tons Nitrogen 'osphorus O&G "
lb ac re
Application
Gallons Per acre
Dry Iona
per Acre
F.A.N.a P
Capper Zinc
Date
Cu Zn
try
IZ�
2.
-
two
6.0
k,
.V
Annual
oafina
analyzedor
reported
I solids
S
♦
�Pctrr °
i

Sludged /Disposal
Report Form
Annual al. Sty mmary
Ow-nert)V
Fuld cx
�'�°�' �
tic. 94.
�. p
Application i t
l Application
pplication
Sludge
Total.
Ga lon
Metals and Nutrient Loading,
**Total Dry Tons NitrogenPhosphorus O
lbs/acr
Application
Gallons
Per Ac e
Dry TonsPer Acre;
'. .N. �' a
Copper in
a toCu
Zn
RN
do
r
t
0. . is
caa
t
&
w
adreporlted,
,
j
{

SludgeLand
Application/Disposal
Report Form
Annual Loading Summary
At)Atf�-
Field No.
No.
Acres :3
Field Crop
Application
qtrtf-:
lud a
ppi itst on
Sludge
To t a I Gallons
**Total
Metals and Nutrient Loading.
Dry Tons Nitrogen Phosphorus
i s/acre
pp icac o
Gallons Per Acre
Dry Tons per A,cre
P.A.N.
PO, as p
upper Zin
Date
Ch n
P
yy
i
4
aY�OR ypq d� y
qM(� �r
a ed,
aunvally
"
(circle): s ris � s s i
{ f
H I

Page
Sludge e
pplicati n/Di osal
Report Form
Annual Loading -
application Method (circle): surfa e
subsa�r a
1
lueApplication
Sludge
Total
Gallons
Total
Meta a and Nutrient Loading,
Dry Tons Nitrogen Phosphorus O&G
i s/acre
�.
Supple
itions
Application
Gallons
Per Acre
Dr Tons Per Acre P.A.N.
Po- as
Copper Zinc Lea is e apt. '
1' ime
€gate
u n Pbl Cd
"5x
�
a
I�
i
"
�.
k
solids

Sludge Land
pplica /Disposal
Report Form
Annual Loading Summary
er
ld
�3
re
`i,eid ru
Pp.ii.catiuu
1
Siud e
Application
Sludge
Total. Gallons
**Total
Me a a and Nutrient Loading,
Dry Trams Nitrogen Phosphorus O&
lb/acre
Application
Gallons Per acre
Dry Tans
Per -Acre P.A.N.
POD
Copper Zin,
Date
Cu Zn
�u e14Z
0 qj
t
Lg
M . ,U'analyzed and
reported
annually
Or wi,
tm &-GaI16US
x X solids
Pal
cirie urace1 a surface
SuPP
i do
ad Nickel ' PCB Li
b :Ni
I

Sludgeo- APPlicatiOU/Disposal
Report Form
Annual Loading
Su=mary
Application
aid e Application
Sludge
Total.
Gallons
**TotalDry
Metals and Nutrient Loading.
Toms Nitrogen Phosphorus O&G
/acre
Application
Gallows
Per Acre
Dry Tons Per Acre
F_A. .
CopperZinc
Date
Zn
a
IqS;0OOI
Z4 1
-
,
"
7-
1-
9, "
500
a
.
1(0) ]t
'a �Jjjnx
.'45
" .. d
reported
wmually

Sludgy Land
Applicatiort/DisposalReport
Annual Loading Su=ary
PPlication Me
P
�
lud
pplcaf
Sludge
tad ally
**Total
a d 3 u ran cad ng.
Vans Nitrogen Phosphorus O&G
l1 cr
Application
Gallons Per Acre
Dry Tons
per Acre P.A.N.P
a p
Copper :zinc
Date
u Zn
! -
a
tJ.IVZ
{
tag
ar
SZ-
repor.ted annually
Pas
..cl r
surface z
trac ;
supp
itiol
Nickel
Cad
Limy
Nid
.s.

00
TN
gyp...PO
•�y �#)TN �}
�y "C
g
n,
2
IT em=
P0320404
Puv p mm
"d 1. 50
01
bov
0010 !"
q g ggigg
14
I i
sv laa SUOLx1 aawT
snaoqdsoqd TN C
'.
. gy. M }TT id3V
S TT 301 a2±CP"
TS
4
Sfigfi
a
"mme
j

Page
Sludge Land Application/Disposal Report Form
Annual Loading rg
Pl cati n Method
(circle):
surface
surface
a Application
10
Sludge
Vital
llo
**Tota ,
Meta red Nutrient Loading, lb/acre
Dry ions;; itr en Phosphorus ",ti
Supple
Application
ll n
Per , c
Dr Togas Per Acre P.A.N. , a Copper Lead Nickel
Cad.'
s '
th
nc
d
1121500
qo r, 0P
N
:�'
`'
I oo
.
70 J
5.
"
.1
`�d
reported.
annually

Sludge Land
Application,/Disposal
Report Form
Annual Loading Summary
pplicatlon Methc
iud a
Application
Sludge
'Total.
Gallons
*Totals
Meta a and Nutrient Loading,
Dry Tons Nitrogen Phosphorus
lb/acre
Application
Gallons
Per Acre
Dry "Togas
Pet tr�
P..N.
P as
Co p r to
Date
as
3
11500
x
4.
KK
0.m OIJ
oa
.m t brad-
ep rl

PO
TN
MTV a
aat p
ddn
as s
asejans
Sad
U'
w
u
w.
Ot
30
a
4
T ladd
d " *' "d lad L a
xts�dsd UOL AI
away ad s z s a a a a do
olaa s T
' pa ua � paw a
'V" a
a pnT
a 3vOT ^ d p
u+a-dd
d ad
a :)V
ONP
pad
guTPROI Tvnnuv
uuoa laodox
T sad a dd^ a2pnIS

Sludge nd
Application/Disposal
Report Form
Waal Loading sum=ry
Field No.
No.
acres qO
Held Crop
lif �
Application Metho,
Sludge
APPlication
Sludge Total Gallons
T t l
Metals and Nutrient Loading,
Tons Nitrogen -'-Phosphorus
lbs/ cre
ApplicationGallons Per acre
Dry Tans per Acre P.A.N.
p P
Copper Zinc I
Date
Cu Zn
14
1+
o
a
.
00
w
ot 1
g
ash
reported,
P,

Sludgy Land Applicatioa/Disposal
Report Form
to l Loading Su=ary
pli'tin Me
` O
glud a Application
Sludge
Total
Gallons
**Total
Metals and Nutrient Loading,
Dry Tons Nitrogen Phosphorus O&G
lbs/acre
AppliCation
Gallons
Per acre
Dry 'inns Per Acre
P.A.N.P
Copper Zinc
D.Cu
Zn
C
Ito
a` �
q 5
` r
t It, ark
g
i
Oz
,
a
' and
reported
annually
_x,•:be'sualyzed
Mid
*n
ircle): surf
Sup
iti`
Nic l Cad.-P Lim
i Cd

Sludge dApplication/Disposal
Report Form
Annual Loading Su=ary
Pplication Method (circle):
surfar
r
d
i ti x7Slueta
Total
Sludgetiol
i
*Total
and tri nt Load3� ,
Dry Tons NitrogenPhosphorus
h r
�n :
i.
aiicaa
'r tr
r Toys Per Acre
P.A.R.
' a p
Copper'- Zinc Lead Nickel
dad.'
a
DApplate
uZn ph ti
a
Cd
251400
_
Z
Mo
M
Zotal Annual
ILA
41m;k
t
fi d
reported
annually
,`Z
solids

a
� n
u
State of North Carolina 441f
Department of Natural Resourcesand CommunityDevelopment
Division of E nvirrinniental Mmi-,v rn nt
512 North Salisbury Street # Raleigh, North an- ina 27611
rne� G. Martin, Governor . Paul fir'"roc r
illiarrr � obey, Jr., Secretary January 26, 1989
Director
Mr. David Taylor
NC Division Engineer
Holly Farms Foods, Inc
k P.O. Box 88
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
SUBJECT: Permit No. NG0021717
IE
Authorization to Construct
Holly farms cods'. Inc.
Dear bra-. Taylor:
Your request was received by the Divi i. n cif Environmental Management on
January 25, 1989., Your request to delay the decision on the EPT
System until
February 27, 1989 is being reviewed the Division's staff. You will b
notified of theDivision's position upon completion of this review:
If you have any questions on this matter, please call'the undersigned at
919/733-5083,
Sinc
erely,
y,
Arthur Mou erry, P.E.
Supervisor,
� sr Pe
rmits nei Engineering
M/t l
e.Winston-Sines Regional Office
Mooresville Regional f fu
Permit file
Are Errual C noorturrrrvr Affirmanve hrtr— P-1

HOLLY FARMS FOODS, INC.
203 9 ° � Ra,7 ki .� 1,-., :2 P C� Nyx . 1 iat...b o Nopl°�
F m,
f \
,t
January , 1989
}
r
p
t71,.. ..
r Arthur Mouberry
North Carolina inao Depar.rtment of Natural
Resources and t;csmmurri.t..y Development
Permits and Engineering Unit
512 North Salisbury Street:
Raleigh, NC 27611
SUBJECT: Permit No. caret, 0 1 7 i t'
Authorization to Cos zstruct Not,.a:, _ ..._
Prey -treatment Facilities
Holly Farms Foods, Inc.
Wilkesboro Complex
Wilkes County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. ouberr; ...k
wren, A,.
This is to confirm our conversation concerning the wastewater
Pre-treatment system at the Holly Farms Foods Plant in Wilkesboro,
North Carolina. As You are aware, we are evaluating the EPI
Wastewater Treatment System that was installed at, the Holly Farms
Plant:. in Harrisonburg, Virginia. Because of factors beyond our
control, we have not been able to c011ect sufficient data t
determine the s stem's feasibility. The PPI System in Harrisonburg
.has not operated continuously to produce sufficient results because
of non -operating days at the Harrisonburg plant: and continuing
difficulties with the sewer mains in they City of Harrisonburg.
I regret that, I must request another extension of the decisiosn,
date. As we discussed, two dates are of Prime importance to the
Division of Environmental Management, the September's, 1
988
compliance date for the Holly ;Farm pre-treatment effluent and the
December 30, 1989 deadline for storage at the land application site
in Rowan County. Holly Farms requests that the decision date be scat-
for February 27, 1989. Everyone involved with the project at
Wilkesboro has committed that the compliance dates will be met if the
project decisions is made on or before this date,
t is; understood by the management of Holly Farms that the
Division of Environmental Management ement can impose enforcement actions
against Holly_ Farms, Everyone involved is working to insure that. the
Division is not forced to take these actions

Mr. Arthur Mouberry - -
1 greatly appreciate Your patience and understanding concerning
the EPI Wastewater Technology. s I have indicated I believe that:
the water treatment has great; promise, both in resulting water
quality and in reuse of the waste material generated.
If You have questions concerning this situation or require other
information, Please contact t# me in Wilkesboro,
Sincerely,
acid T a l or,
.0 , Division Engineer
T/mf
rSteve Mooney - NCDNRCD, Winston-Salem
Red Gleason - NCDNRCD, Mooresville
Gary ottomley -Senior Vice president
SkiPper Solomon - Vice President.
Frank Tara ide
Charles Case<
Ray Burris

x, u
SECTION
SITE SOIL REVIEW
The personnel of Holly Farms Foods, Inc., have selected nine proposed
sludge application sites to add to the original Sledge Disposal Permit On
July 20 and 21, 1988, ,these sites were examined by d soil scientist to
evaluate in detail the soil profile descriptions, their physical
properties, and their landscape positions as these factors relate to a
successful laud application program. The preliminary review of the soils
in Ronan and Wilkes Counties (Figures 1 and , reflect moderate to deep
soil profiles with a rapid infiltration and moderate subsoil hydraulic
conductivities. Based on the aerial photographs the sites also appear to
be nearly level to moderately sloping.
e first ,five sites are located in the northwestern portion of Rowan
County (Figure 3). These farms can be easily accessed from Interstate 40
and U.S. 64 South to Statesville, Borth Carolina, From U.S. 64, all of
the secondary roads to the sites are paved, Field '(Figure contains
approximately 29 acres,_ and is located at the northwest portion of the
intersection of SR 1980 and SR 1981. The remaining tour sites, (fields A,
, C, and D,; `igur'e 3) dotal approximately 128 acres and are located 1
miles east of the SR 1978 intersection with SR 1977.
These five sites are ideally situated in close proximity to one
another and are only separated by 5 miles. The agricultural settings in
Rowan County are characterized by nearly level to gently sloping lands.
Some slopes may exceed 10 percent around drainage or stream channels.
4

One hundred and two acres divided into four smaller fields are located
in the southeastern portion of Wilkes County. These sites are located
only 10 miles southeast of Wilkesboro, forth Carolina, and more
specifically; on the east side of NC 11.5, approximately 5 miles south o
the intersection between NC 115, and U.S. Route 421. Again, these four
fields are easily reached by major and secondary roads. Field "a"° is
roughly 35 acres, Field " 19 acres, Field " ";approximately 25 acres,
and Field " "" 23 acres. Fields "A, B, and " are proposed sites for
sludge application, while Field "C" has been proposed, as a construction
site for a sludge holding lagoon (Figure .
Wilkes County and the respective four land sites ire located in a
x ,mountainous region, .n the state of North Carolina Steep slopes and
narrow valleys are quite common in this area. Slopes of.15 percent or
more are typical in many pastures and grass cover fields in Wilkes County
thus, thinner .soils and site limitations may require specific management
techniques to successfully utilize an area for the land application
program.
.1 ROWAN COUNTY SITES
e proposed Field "" site (Figure 5) is located in an agricultural
area with surrounding scattered residences and churches. At the time of
the soil field review, here were no homes or churches observed within 400
feet of the property boundary* around the site. Also absent from the area
were ponds and s,treams. Foods lined the western and northern sides of the
_property, as SS 1980 and SR 1951 served as boundaries on the east and
south sides, respectively. Slopes generally were level to gentle:
5

e soils were examined by probing a hand, auger through the sail
profile., Soil samples were delineated and described at each hori:onat'ion
to record the textural class, Munsell colors, structures, depths,
boundaries and any other observations that may be;of value when preparing
a management plan*
Since a modern soil survey of Rowan County has not yet been published,
the soil series for these samples cannot he depicted.. ree soil cores
were angered in a diagonal transect across the field, and three similar,
yet, varied soils were described.
The first soil sampled in Field "S"was located in the southwest
corner of the field, approximately 150 feet from the road and Brooded ,
boundary line. This soil is well drained to excessively drained through a
hori onati:on of Ap- - -Btl- t2-g - (Table 2).
e textural classes
through the profile range from fine sandy loam to a sandy clay loam, The
chroma colors, of this soil, are indicative of its excessively drained
y nature, all of which are greater than 2.
The second soil sampled across Field "S was as close to the center of
the field as possible , and. approximately 225 feat from. Roane Road. 1980.
This soil too, as all of : the adjacent ent soils, are well drained to
excessively ivel.y drained.. The hori onati.on expresses an Ap- -g - tl-iit2-
(Table 3). The textures again grade from a fine sander loam surface soil
down to a clay subsoil. Soil water readily infiltrates into the Ap
horizon and moves downward through the soil profile to the least limiting
layer, The least limiting layer usually reflects an increase in clay
content, or a change in structure. Therefore, water movement will be ,
somewhat reduced when it contacts the clayey Bt horizon:.

The final soil sample from the transect across Field " " is quite
mailer to the previous soil descriptions, with a minor difference being
fewer horizons (Table . With a Field average ph of 6.8 (attached data
sheets), all of these soils appear well suited for sludge application and
the level to gently sloping landscape will definitely enhance
Infiltration. The well mixed and aerated Ap-horizon will also provide an
excellent medium for sludge decomposition, whether the plan calls for
surface applications or injections,
e same procedures used is sampling and describing the soils in Field
'IS", were implemented in the fields at the intersection of SR 1977 and SR
1978. Located only 5 miles southwest of Field "", Fields '"A, B, C, and
D" were all similar to those soils previously described (Tables 5, 6, 7,
And m As -;a result of the similarities among the soils, a preliminary
survey of each f ield was made prior to any soil sampling and
descriptions. After the initial survey, one locale was declared as e
representative position for the soil: description work
In Field "A", forests surround the entire acreage and present, an
excellent outline of the property boundary. Erosion control terraces also
sculpted the landscape and appeared to rain parallel with the hil.lsldpe
contours. These terraces not only decrease the veracity of surface water
runoff, bent•_ also channel this energy and re -distribute the water over a
greater field .area. present in the field area were 3 partial drainage
ways that, with the increase in slope around these drainages, help to
remove excesssurface water after heavy rainfall events. The soil itself
s deeply drained and exhibits a well developed soil. profile. A
significant increase in clay is identified in the subsoil horizon at

L_
r
approximately 22 inches in depth.
These fields in Rowan County, (A" B, C, and are currently being
utilized for pasture grass and hays operations. With the exception of two
rented homes adjacent to Field " "d, no father homes or wells were observed
within 400 or 100 feet,_respectively. The slopes in Fields "A"" "B", and
"C" were generally -6 percent in grade, while those observed on site """
were 'slightly higher in grades of 6-10 percent.
Field "g" was characterized by having a fine sandy loam surface, a
clayey subsoil_, and a sandy loam -horizon around 50 inches in depth.
This profile was deeper (56 inches plus) and observations indicate ;the
water table to be at a depth of more than 5 fetes
Fields "C" and "D" are separated: by SR 1978 and due to their
similarities will be discussed together. Of the two, " tales on the
upland topographical landscape definition with near level to gentle
slopes. Field " , just on the opposite side of the road, has increased
4 side slopes and an intermittent drainage way thrown the middle of the
acreage: The soils are quite similar, exhibiting sandy loam surfaces,
sandy clay subsoils, and returning to massive sandy to -horizons. The
depths of the horizons vary only,within "inches, as the introduction of the
clayey subsoil,, horizons for fields "" and. "";are 13 and 7 inches with
depth, respectively. Being located in the lower landscape positions may
create some important limitations to the suitability of Field "D . These
limitations are the increased side slopes and the moderate soil profile
permeability,.

3.2 WILKES COUNTY SITE
The Wilkes County sites are divided into ;four fields and labeled "A",
"err "" " and "r" 3 Fields "A", "" , and "" are proposed sites for land
sludge application and Field " " has been proposed ;for the construction o
d sludge holding lagoon. Currently, Fields "A"" " ", and "D" are i
pasture grass and red clover" and presently grazed., Fiel. "C"has not
been cultivated for sometime, as grasses, weeds, and small shrubs cover`
the area, It appears that the most important limitations for these sites
are slopes in excess of 15 percent, the landscape erosion down these
slopes, and the soil depths to lbedroc:
From a soils standpoint, Fields "A" an "C" exhibit similar
characteristics, as do the soils in Fields " and "" The soils i
Fields "A any " depict an A-Btl-BO-BO-BC-C soil horizon designation
with a clear difference in the depth of the soils in Field "A". Twenty to
thirty inch depth differences were consistently observed between Field "
and Field. "" . The initial reason and cause for these differences
appeared to be the increased slope gradient, and thus" surface erosion of
the soils in Field " ". Sandy loams and sandy clay loam textures were
common and the colors only varied from red: and yellow -brown surfaces to
reds and yellow -red subsoils'
e buffer zone requirement around Field "A" appears to be verb
straight- forward requiring a 100 foot buffer around the property line and
0 foot buffer zone around a farm house at the: base of a 10-15 percent
,lope on the southern portion of the property. Field ""'" is more
complicated for a number of masons, First of all., the slopes are on the
magnitude ude of 10-15 percent" with some areas recording 15-25 percent.

These slopes have obviously influenced the presence of drainage channels
and streams it the northeastern an southwestern portions of the property.
Moderate to severe surface erosion can also he observed near these
channels. The growth of ;gasses and shrubs have also created a
non -distinct property boundary with the adjacent forested trees.
e snails in Fields """ and " " are very simi.l.ar. Surface soils are
typically sandy loams and range to 7 inches in depth. Subsoil horizons
are more sandy clay loams and are approximately 28 inches thick to the top
of the -horizon. Both of these soils appear to he limited by the depth
to bedrock and the presence of coarse rock fragments in the surface
horizons.
For the most part, the slopes in field "B" range from -15 percent
with some isolated areas on the outermost edges of the property increasing
to 1 - 5 percent, These are the areas of drainage channels and moderate
erosion.
Most of the slopes in Field " " are 1. - 5 percent in grade, These
slopes limit the site suitability because they tend to be; the cause for
moderate to suer erosion on the side slopes and: weathering of the soil
down to the underlying bedrock outcrops, A stream also runs in a north
and south direction through and with the length of the property. At the
northern portion of the field the stream is approximately 100 feet from
the eastproperty line and narrows to less than 40 feet as it exits the
southern property line,
10"

SECTION
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAND TREATMENT
To determine the suitability of a specific site for a land application..
program, a number of factors should be considered. These factors of
consideration include; the current and planned land use, the soil
characteristics, the topography and landscape positions, and the sludge
characteristics. The DEK devised a rating system to evaluate potential
land sites for the treatment and application of sludges.
Their ratings systems for site evaluations are based on specific soil
factors such as; soil depth to bedrock or the saturated zone, slope,
cation exchange -capacity El, and soil pH.
e design application rate is based on the nutrient requirements of
the crop, soil characteristics, and the metals loading. The plant
,available nitrogen is typically used as the limiting .ng nutrient for
application, since PAN is a major nutrient for crop production. Compared
to phosphorus and potassium, two other common fertilizer constituents,
most crops grown in North Carolina require greater amounts of available
nitrogen. The North Carolina Department of Agriculture Soil. Testing
Laboratory has developed nitrogen recommendations for typical crops grown
in the State (Table 1
Another factor which influences the sludge application rate to
agricultural land is the ability of a soil to incorporate and assimilate
the sludge metal concentrations*_ The soil cation exchange capacity,
CEC ,, has been selected by the DEK as a soil parameter to predict the
soil tolerable levels for metal loading;. Sails with lour E+'s _S

meq 100 can only receive lair metal loading while souls with higher "s
can receive steadily increasing amounts (Table l
For these proposed sites in Rowan and Giles counties, the Ni and Cd.
concentrations in the sludge must be laboratory analyzed before an
accurate recommendation can be determined. However, the mail f `s for
the proposed sites, range from 3,9 meq/100g In field "" in Wilkes County
to 12.0 meq/100g for Field "" " in Rowan County;
e availability of metals and CEC are further influenced by the soil
etals are generally more soluble in acidic soils, thus, by raisin
the pH to more neutral conditions, the solubility of the metals decrease.
In North Carolina the DEM requires the soil pH to he adjusted to at least
6.5 for agricultural fields. Based on the attached soil test results,
liming will be a. required amendment on an annual basis to maintain a
proper soil pH.,
Upon the compilation of the information obtained form the site review,
the criteria established by the regulatory review agencies, and previous
experience, all of the sites in Rowan County appear to be suitable for
land application. Likewise all of the sites in Wilkes County are
suitable, with the exception of Field """ which is unsuitable, The soil
depth to bedrock, , the presence of coarse rock fragments in the surface
horizons," the steep slopes, and the - low "s all influenced this
recommendation to withdraw Field "D" from the: proposal. Field "" in
Wilkes County may experience some of the same problems as field "D", but
to a smaller degree. In addition, Field. " ": s only to be used as a site
for a holding lagoon:

Westinghouse
EnvironmentalServices
Holly Farms
Poultry Industries, Inc.
1600 River Road
Wilkesboro, North Carolina 28697
Attention: David "Taylor
Engineering/Technical Services,
Reference: Additional Land Application Acreage
0
3500-8 egencfiF °r .r, ac
0 Box 1308
FAX li; 4} 481 r80
Holly Farms, Foods, Inc:
Jar Mr. Taylor
Westinghouse Environmental Engineering (formerly has completed
the attached Land Application site report. Included in the report are
discussions and data related to the proposed land treatment And
utilization program. Based on similar land treatment projects, cts, the
enclosed report should provide the necessary information for the proposed
land treatment site evaluation performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (HEM).
Westinghouse suggests three copies of this report and a land
application permit fee 0.00 be submitted to the DEM-Regional
office. A. cover latter should also note that Holly Farms Foods, Inc. is
requesting land to add to their original land treatment permit.
If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Westinghouse Environmental Services
David Burk
Staff Soil Scientist
640*10VAROM
Environmental E.nginpennq
*d fis a 6v,, ian of SWE i;1c t,t Nonu: 'va o,,i 3offering :rt?i't`R es as S&V—E .;s:par. smhi: ,.

M �
TABLE OF CONTENTS
JL
SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS AND LANDT'
SITE SOIL REVIEW
3.1 OWSITES 5
3.2 WILKES COUNTY SITES
RECOM14ENDATIONS FOR LAND TREATMENT 11
APPENDICES

LIST OF TABLES
Table No,-
Title
1
Sludge Chemical and Physical
Analysis for Selected
Parameters.
2-4
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"S", Rowan County,
5
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"A", Rowan County,
6
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"B", Rowan County,
7
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"C", Rowan County.
8
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"D", Rowan County.
9
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"A", Wilkes County.
10
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"B", Wilkes County.
11
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"C", Wilkes County,
12
Soil Profile
Characteristics,
Field
"D", Wilkes County.
13
PAN Requirements for Typical
Crops
Grown in Wilkes County,
North Carolina and Respective
Sludge
Application Rates.
14
Current DEM
Regulations and Guidelines for Various Metal
Applications with Respect to Soil CEC.

LIST OF FIGURES
pl&urn Fig. litle
Location Flap
" Location Map - Wilkes County
Topography Sites n Rowan County
4 Soil. Map of Sites in Wilkes County
Field "S" - Rowan County

SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Westinghouse Environmental Services, at the request of Mr. David
Taylor of Molly Farms Foods Inc., has surveyed proposed land sites for the
purpose of applying du ri.al sludge on an annual basis for several
locations in Rowan and Wilkes Counties, North Carolina. Three new land
sites; totalling 157 acres in Rowan County, and 102 acres in Wilkes
County, have been submitted as additions to the original Holly Farms
Sludge Disposal permit. Our survey was initiated for the purpose of site
assessment; soil evaluations, and overall general descriptions of the
proposed areas
Soil has a significant capacity to decompose and incorporate organic
materials, thus, the utilization of sludge, as a soil amendment and a
fertilizer, in an agricultural production program. The effectiveness of
the sludge as a fertilizeris dependant upon the soil physical and
chemical properties, as well as the sludge nutrient contents and
characteristics, and the crop requirements.
n determining the field loading rate of a "good quality" sludge, the
nitrogen requirement of the crop and the plant available nitrogen (PAN),,
content of the sludge is used. Since crops require different amounts of
PAN to reach maturity, sludge application rates vary for specific crops;..
However, in North Carolina., most agronomic crops require 50 to 350 pounds
per acre of P
11

SECTION
SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICSD TREATMENT
Holly Farms foods, Inc., for the operating year of 1987, applied
nearly 1600 dry tons of sludge through a land application process. This
sludge was generated from a dissolved air floatation system and subsequent
aeration lagoons;
Table l depicts the analyzed constituents of a sludge sample for the
Holly Farms Rendering Plant in Harmony, North Carolina$ The data reflects
reasonable information and appears suitable for agricultural use in a crop
production progr
e greatest concern in the maintenance of local environmental quality
and the agricultural community is the presence of metals in the
land -applied sludge. The sludge was analyzed for selected heavy metals
',including: Cu, Fe, Pb, Se, and Zn. Heavy metal concentration in most
*. food -processing waste waters are very low and are not likely to have an
adverse effect on a land application site.
e purpose of the land treatment program specified by holly Farms
Foods, Inc., will be the successful utilization of sludge as a fertilizer'
source and a soil amendment. The North Carolina Department of natural
Resources and Community Development Division of Environmental Management
( has; set. standards where annual sludge applications are not to exceed
the determined annual soil loading rates for metals and a PAN application
rate not to exceed. 200 lbs./acre/"year. In accordance with the above
standards, all of the other "Safe Standard Levels'established and adopted
by the EPA and USDA :are to be maintained. Buffer zones, in which no

sludge will be injected, near property lines, residences and wells,;
streams, and ponds, etc. are to be strictly observed.

TABLE 1
Rally Farms Foods, Inc. Sludge Chemical an
Physical Analysis for eleed Parameters
Westinghouse Job No. 4116-88-608
rgirmLete-ri Conditlt
pH 4.8
Total Solids 21.*
mg/Kg,
NH3 N 22 mg/Kg
mg/Kg
Total Phosphorus
Potassium mg/Kg
u 4.9 mg/Kg"
zu 28 mg/Kg
d ND
Pb 31 mg/Kg
i ND

TABLE 2"
Soil Profile Characteristics
Field " "
Westinghouse .lob No. 411 - -0
Mun a l
Textural
b ..a
bolo `
lass
o
(in.)
Ap
-4
ICE YR 4/3fine
sandy loam
weak granular
4 ®9
7.5 YR 5/4
sandy loam
weak granular
BE
-18
2.5
sandy loam
weak aubangular blocky
tl
1 -21
2.5 YR 5 8
sandy clay
moderate subangular blocky
t2
21-29
2a 4
clay
moderate subangular blocky
BC
29-44
2.5 YR 4/8
clay loam
veakauban ular blocky
"
4+
5 5/8
sandy loam
weak subangular blocky

3
Soil Profile Characteristics -
Field "
Westinghouse Job No. 4116`-88- 0
unsell
"Textural
a*c
t
o1or
Structure-
in.)
AP
0-8
10 YR 4/4
fine sandy loan
weak granular
-17
1 /3
sandy loam
weak. granular
BE
17-24
10 YR 4 3
sandy clay loan
weak subangular blocky
Btl
24-32
7. 8
fine sandy clay
moderate subangular blocky
Et2
32-47
7.5 YR 5/g
sandy clay
weak subangular blocky
47+
1 8
sand loam
massive

TABLE 4
Soil Profile Characteristics_
Field "S"
Westinghouse Job No. 11 -88-60
unsall
Textural
a iDszui
Class
iu
(in.)
ApR
0-
4/6
fine sandy loam
weak granular'
b 1
7-19
2.5 4/6
sandy clay
moderate subangular blocky
B 2
19-32
2> 8
sandy clay
moderate subangular blocky
b
-56
2. 4/6
sandy clay loam
creak subangular blocky
56+
5 YR 5/6
sandy loam
massive

TABLE
Soil profile Characteristics_
Field "A" Rowan County
Westinghouse Job No. 4116-88-608
unscll
Textural
Horizon
Dgep_th
C212rClass
Structure
in.
A
-5
l
fine sandy loam
moderate granular
A
-15
1 5
sandy clay loam
weak subangular blocky
b l
15-22
1
sandy clay
moderato subangular blocky
bt2
22-30
lei YR 4,
clay
moderate subangular blocky
BO
- 9
10 YR 5/8
clay
moderate subangular, blocky
BC
- 4
7.5 5 "8
sandy clay loam
weak subangular blocky
+
7.5 YR 6/8
sandy loam
massive

TABLE
Soil Profile Characteristics
Field "B" Rowan County
Westinghouse Job No. 4116-88-608
Munsell Textural
Hor 2
h
Color laaa
Structure
(in.)
Ap
0-3
10 YR 4/2 fine sandy loam
wreak granular
-7
� 4 "4 sandy loam
wreak ;granular
BE
-11
5 YR 4/8 sandy clay loam wreak
aubanBular blocky
Btl
11-30
2.5 YR 4/8 clay moderate subangular blocky
Bt7
-40
clay weak
suban8ular blocky
BC
4 -45
2.5 YR 5/8 clay loam wreak
subangularblocky
45-5
.5 YR 5 8 sandy loam
massive

TABLE
Sail Profile Maracteristics
Field "C" Rowan'County
Westinghouse Job No. 116-88-6 8
Munsell Textural
Horizon o w` � Class Structure
n.)
,p -6 10 YR 4/3 fine sandy loam moderate granular
g -13 10 YR 6/3 very fine sandy
clay loam weak granular
btl 13-22 10 sandy clay moderate ub n ula 'blocky
22-29 7. '6 clay weak subangular blocky
gC 29-40 7.5 sandy loam weak su angular blocky
+ 5 YR 6/8 sandy y loam massive

TABLE `
Soil Profile Characteristics
Field ®' " Rowan 'County
Westinghouse Job No.4116-88-608
tun ell Textural
b ...c`
Ptah
Colorlass
Structure
(in.)
Ap
-7
lea YR 5/3 sandy loam moderate granular
1
-11 "
1 /6 sandy clay loam weak
subangular blocky
11-27
7.sandy clay moderate subangular blocky
BC
-34
7.5 YR 5/4 sandy clay loan weak
subangular blocky
3 a- 6+
coarse sandy loam
massive

TABLE 9
Soil Profile Characteristics
Field "A" `lea County
Westinghouse tinghous Job No. ' 4116-88-6 8
Munaell Textural
Horizon
Color Class 8t cure
(in.)
•1C
2. 4/6 fine sandy loam moderate granular
Btl
1 -14
2.5 YR 4,/8 sandy clay loam moderate subangular blocky
Bt2
1 -21
2.5 YR 4/6 sandy clay moderate subangular blocky
BO
2 -4
/'8 clay moderate sub,angular blocky
BC
4 - 7
5/4
mottles o
7. /8 sandy clay loam weak auhangular blocky
C
70+
5 YR 5/8 sandy clay loam massive.

ABLE 10
Sul Profile Characteristics
Feld "B" Wilkes County
Westinghouse Job No. 4116-88-608
unsell 'textural
ff_orizon
n c class
S u ure
(fin-
0-8
1 /4 sandy loam
weave granular
BA
8-13
1 ,✓4 sandy loam
creak granular
B l
1 -17
sandy clay loam weak
subangular blocky
Bt2
17-24
2, sandy clay loam moderate suhan` lar blocky
BC
24-39
7. 4 sanely loam ea
supangular blocky
2.
mottles of
7. 5 '4 sandy loam
massive

TABLE11
Soil Profile Characteristics
Field "" Wilkes County
Westinghouse Job No. 4116-88-608
unsel Textural
Horizon RMUI Color Structure
(in.)
7¢ '6 sandy loam moderate granular
ul 7-18 5 YR 4/3 sandy'elay loam weak subangular blocky'
Bt2 18- , 6 sandy clay moderate subangular blocky
Bt3 -3 6 clay moderate subangular blocky
BC 30-48 2a54 6 sandy'; clay loam weak subangular blocky
. sandy loam massive

4
TABLE1
Boil Profile Characteristics'
Field I'D" Wilkes County
Westinghouse Job No. 116-88-6 8
unsell Textural
Horizon
t
_ColorMass
Structure-
i.n.
A
-6
1 sandy loam moderate granular
BA
6-10
l '6 sandy clay loam weak
subangular blocky
Bt
10!-24
7. B sandy clay moderate subangular blocky
BC
24-346
sandy clay loam weak
subangular blocky
C
34-42
5 YR 6/8 coarsesandy to
'massive

TABLE1
PAN Requirements for Typical Crops
Grown`in Wilkes County, North Carolina
and Respective Sludge Application Rates'
N. Reggirld W&I Amliaaslm*
(lbs. "ac a) (dry tons)
Corn 160 5.
Small Grain 100 2.5
Alfalfa 200 4.
Bluegrass 120 3.
u`nras 220 5.4
Fescue (Tim) 200 4.9
*Based on PAN of 40.6 lbs 'dry ton

TABLE 1
Current DER Regulations, and Guidelines
for Various Metal Applications
with Respect to Soil CEC
Pb 500 lbs. 1,000 lbs. 2,000 lb .
n 250 500 1,000
u 125 250 500
Ti 125 250 500
Cd 5 8.9 18
Annual Cd application cannot exceed .5 pounds per acre per year.

Yam.
NOW fiFW
Yi A 9FF lamb
aeap 8b&9� ktWa
4 a
MYW Y�id92 ePMi�t#AwalgfkY YtiM�fYt
1*
to
l
ti
w OWN%
sft
jp
out
yq
py
UK
am
i
lwwr
Y
* f
Y
.G
PPS°y
nit
tlu
au
as ern
Y
m
P
,aa
'...t
lut
�w
y J{ma
i
ima.
e !jai
�
4
xG
ML
S Waw'`
y +
fm
7
B
ok
t�
ergo
w^a
s
&
Y

Land Treatment
tp Wilkes Co.
mom

1
m
VA
42r's
u
+
Syr' p
,
-
°
w «*t t r 41
1*4
M*
AL
„w we
�R
A Not scale
Holly Farms Lard 'dr at � . �+ � � �- �i
Soil Map of Sitar in Wilk
I
County.
WON
M -4

a r s
r
p
n
P
1 ,
ff
00
»
°
ati t
x,
. x
u
a r re
u
• 'k .+`' # s ;tAe , "�4,c<psa r x ^ °+�...:a + s'�i° � 'm ` � t r a� s T .�,. ^r'�'`s.„� a4 � .
ry
a .
r„'m"'• " ,�` � w a »� a i x e a P .. n j; • "'
E t m
x
�° "w - „ ».a w'u s • t, „ "r ;: � . , ' a ,
t
r 1�
x. b y 9 • ri Px t�i' . �I` PU. " e :✓ ... *i P .a,n Y LW e'h mow,
d
PROJECT S7
ALE n Not to scale
Holly Farms Land Treatment
Field "S" -- Rowan County01 --

APPENDIX C
SOIL BORATORY RESULTS
v

� »:»� d<�
� <
� �
� �
� � � �
� i� d2�
� �\
d
.� � y §�
<f
\� �
.,� � d� , � ©2 ± n� � \\� °®^~° �� ~� ^� � 22\<
� \\: y m y� f: � >: . ...»g°« y�� t«» : »- d©� »� � � � � � ?
© . a � � � :«< . �©� v :z.a :.«>� «xa� :
\� � ©� <y� »� � <� <� � � � � ? 2� m� dw«e2� � � � � � � � »

HOLLY FARMS FOODS, INC.
FRESH RETAIL DIVISION, TYSON FOODS, INC.
1600 River Road, P.O. Box 88 Wwbwo, NWh Carolbia 28697,0088 w NIM SW2171
loops Wo"ImWom am"""
199DJanuary 31, 1990
somm awful
Mr. Michael L. Parker,
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
SUBJECT: 1989 Annual Report,
Permit No. WQ0000701
Holly Farms Foods, Inc.
Harmony Rendering Plant
Land Application Permit
Rowan County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Parker:
Attached you will find the annual report of the disposal
activities conducted by Holly Farms in Rowan County. As we recently
discussed, phosphorus, PCB, and residual chlorine tests were
inadvertently omitted. Samples of the skimmings have been sent to
the laboratory to obtain these values and will be sent to you as soon
as possible.
Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this
report or require any further information.
Sincerely,
Lawrence R. Sampson Jr., P.E.
N.C. Division Engineer
LRS/mf
Attachment
cc: Ben Laws

a *
Offices:
Minneapolis, Minnesota
P10ce
REPORT OF LABORATORY iLI
Tampa, Florida
h
o T inC,
oraly lle, Iowa
Novato, California
t
Leawood, Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, North
Carolina
PACE Client No.: 510025
December 7, 1999
PACE Project Number:
69102
504
Client: Holly Farms
Foods, Inc.
Address; Technical
Services
Complex
1600 River
Wilkesboro,
NC
2597
Attn: Daniel C.
Wyatt
Sample Location: Harmony
Sludge, Direct
Cate Sample(s) Collected.
10 17/89
Date Sample(s) Received;
10 20/89
PACE Sample Number:
91247
PARAMETERS
UNITS
RESULTS
PARAMETERS
UNITS
RESULTS
SCU, 5-Day
mg/kg
205,000
__
Silver
mg/kg
L C,
Alkalinity
mg CaCO3
L L 200
Arsenic
mg/kg
12.0
COD
mg/kg
2,509,000
Boron
mg/kg
L 400
Ammonia -Nitrogen
mg/kg
3000
Barium
mg/kg
20
Total Nitrogen
mg/kg
50,041
Calcium
mg/kg
2800
TKN
mg/kg
50,000
Cadmium
mg/kg
L 0•5
Nitrate -Nitrogen
mg/kg'
28
Total Chromium um
mg/kg
5.8
Nitrite -Nitrogen
mg/kg
13
Copper
mg/kq
5.
Oil and Crep.
mg/kq
644,006
Iron
mg/kg
2700
pH
units
5.3
Mercury
ma/kg
L 0.01
Percent Solids
10.12
Potassium
It k
940
Sulfate
mg/kg
L 50
Magnesium
mg/kg
23
Manganese
mg/kg'
SS
Sodium
mq/kg
750
Ni c kal
mg/kg
.9
Lead
mg/kq
4.6
Selenium
mg/kg
L 0.5
Zinc
mg/kg
150
All mg/kg results are dry -height basis.
C Greater than
L Less than
The; data contained in this report were obtained using EPA
or tither approved methodologies. All analyses were performed
by me or under my direct supervision.
9_dqjL_��J,
J. Allen S ivo,v-
Manager, Analytical Laboratory
P.O. Box 6 0 Asheboro, NC 27-:03 0 phone 1
are equal opp artunhy° adapt r

Offices -
Minneapolis, Minnesota
acc, L "YSI Tampa, Flori a
(oralvilla, Iowa
aborationes, inc, Novato, California
,Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, Ndrlh CaroR7na
PACE Client .: 61003 December 7, 19E9
PACE Project Number: 691020504
Client: Holly Farms Foods, Inc,
Address: Technical Services Complex
1600 River
Wilkesboro, NC 3697
Attn: Daniel O. Wyatt
Sample Location: Wilkesboro Grease Trap Sludge, Direct
Data Sample(s) Collected: 10/17/9
Date Sample(s) Received. 10/0/
RACE Sample Number: 91246
PARAMETERS UNITS RESULTS PARAMETERS UNITS RESULTS �
---
EODSD�,��.�_m_�-�� �,/--------
_-mm- 1�30,000 Silver rng/ L 0
Alkalinity mg CaCO3/L L 200 Arsenic mg/kq 1.1
COD mg/'kg 3, 5 00, 3 00 Enron mg/K" I I, i0
Amm i a -Nitrogen mg/kq 300 Barium mg/kg 3.4
Total Nitrogen ma/kg t9 Calciummg/kg 44
TENRig/kg 8900 Cadmium mR/kR 1m 0.1
Nitrate -Nitrogen mg/kg 7.4 Total Chromic mg/kg 0. s
Nitrite -Nitrogen mg/kg 0.3 Copper mg/kg 12.8
Oil and Grease mg k9 670,000 Ironmg/kq 1.70
pH units 4.5 Mercury mglk0,.01
Percent Solids 31.24 Potassium mq/kg 1 Ail
Sulfate mg/kg L 16 Magnesium /kg 13.0
Manganese erg/kg 3.4
Sodium rig/kg 237
Nickelmg/kg 0.4
Lead mg/kg 1.1
Selenium mg/kg L 0.3
Zinc mg/kg 35.
i
All mg/kg results are dry -weight basis.
0 Greater than
Less than
The data contained in this report were obtained using ERA
or other approved methodologies. All analyses were performed
by me or under my direct supervision
9AA4�
d a Allen Spivey
Manager, Analytical Laboratory
P.O.Box6 C1 Asheboro, NC27203 0 Phone [phone]
an ec ua! opportunity rptoyer

offices:
F
Minneapolis Minnesota
Tampa, lorida,
I t REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS 'P
'Pace F
laboratories,
Inc.
Coralville, Iowa
Novato, California
Leawood, Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, North Carolina
owner and Location
Holly Farms Foods
of Sample Source:
P. 0. Box 88
Wilesboro, NC 28697
Attn: Mrs Danny Wyatt
Laboratory:
at
PACE Laboratories, Inc.
110 West Avenue
Asheboro, NC 27203
USEPA Lab No. NCO02
NCNRCD Lab No. 18
NCSDWA Lab N. 37700
Sample Collected by:
David Stone
Date Sampled:
October 11, 1989
Date Received in Lab:
October 12, 1989
Sample Location:
Wilkesboro Grease Trap Sludge
Harmony Sludge
Physical Characteristics:
Laye-
-- none -�UTFT—ayer
B&V Sample Number:
91139 (Wilkesboro Sludge)
91140 (Harmony Sludge)
Client 1.D. Number:
610028
Date Reported:
November 27, 1989

Offices:
, ►
Minneapolis, Minnesota
REPORT F LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Tampa,Florida
*
lobora nit z
oralville, Co q
Novato, California
"
,
Leawood, Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, North Carolina
Cli nt: Holier Farms Foods
-2-
Sample: 91139-L
Location; Wilkesboro Grease Trap
Sludge
Project. 69101250
E P TOXICITY LEACHATE PROCEDURE
AND TEST
DATA
<HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING PROCEDURE
------------------------------------
The sample was analyzed for eight
metals and six
organics listed in
the regulations and according to the extraction and
filtration procedures
detailed in CFF, Vol. 45, No. 98,
Monday, May 19,
1980, pp. 33121-3312 .
I
ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED:
Mettler A -1w5C Analytical Balance
Perkin-Elmer
HGA- CC Graphite
Eoe el Desiccators
Furnace
Fisher Isotellrp Ovens
B&L 5pectronic
70 Spectrophotometer_
Corning AC-11 Class Stills
Perkin-Elmer
5000 Atomic Absorption
Millipore Pressure Filtration
Spectrophotometer
and Extraction Assemblies
Perkin-Elmer
Sigma 28 Gas
Perkin-Elmer PR -1C Painter
Chr matograph
Fisher Accument Model 520 pH meter
LEACHATE TEST DATA:
— s — ern' — w a — — — m m ------
,Acetic acid requirements were determined from one
sample, as listed
below-
E
Time
Saslol e , Wei ghtµ 200.9 grains
Checked
rills Added
r. w w arv,..— s are. wn... fi
..... w i r w —.. .. ... —
—
.5 N Acetic Acid)
i
leis of 0.5 N
Initial
C
acetic acid
15 min.
C
required to
30 min.
0'
adjust to
1 hr.
9
50 +_" 0.2
2 hr.
C
at different
3 hr.
C-
time intervals
4 hr.
C
24 hr'.
C
_2 hr.---------
Total
CHARACTERISTICS OF SLUDGE:
---------------------------
Cor°rosivit,y:; pH (initial)
4a2
PH (after leachate
Ignitability (F)*
P.O. Box 6 1:3 Asheboro, NC
0 � Phone( C -
an equal o
p
f 4%.Mng qT Y�' �r

Offices.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
REPORT LABORATORY ANALYSIS
pampa, Florida
laboratones, nc,
oralrrill, Iowa
Novato, California
Leawood, Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, North Carolina ;
Cl i P nt»
Holly Farts Foods - -
Sample: 91139
Location.
Wilkesboro Grease Trap Sludge
Project: 691012504
{
1
F P TOXICITY L6AHATF
TEST RESULTS
EPA
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
MAXIMUM
LEVEL
NUMBERCONTAMINANT
ANT CONCENTRATION
DETECTED
i 1
(1 )'
6 4
Arsenic
5
L 0.005
D005
Barium
100.0
L 0.5
D006
Cadmium
1.0
L 0.003
D007
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.0
L 0.10
Chromium, Total
5.0
0.09
D008
Load
5.6
L 0.03
DOIO
Selenium
1.0
L 0.005
11
Silver
5.0
L 0.005
D012
Fndrin (1, ,5,4,10,1
H chi r -1, -, _
0.02
L 0.005
1,4,4a,5,6, , ,6a
octahydro 1,4,_-o do,
ndo-5,6-dimhanonaphtha
lono)
1
Lindano (1,,,4,5,6
L Il.l5
Hoachlorocyclohoano, gamma
isomer)
D01.4
tho ychlor (1,1,1-Trichloro
16, f
L 4LI 5
,-bis(p-mothoyphonyl)than
D 15
To;aph no (Technical chlorinated
.5
L 0.005
camph no, 6 -69 chlorine)
D 16
,4- _, ( ,4 Dichloro h no ,ya oti
10.0
L 0.005
acid)
D017
2,4,5-TP( ll o ( ,4,5-
1.0
L 0.005
Trichlorophono ypropionic acid
P6FL Xb—o-r
orTInc-
11769
x 6 � s Asheboro, NC 272030 Phone [phone]
an e auaal onDortvoity emoJover

pacevREPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
laboratones, inc,
Client: Holly Farms Foods -2-
Location: Harmony Sludge
E P TOXICITY LEACHATE PROCEDURE
AND TEST DATA
Offices:
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Coralville, Iowa
Novato, California
Leawood, Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, North Carolina
Sample: 91140-L
Project: 691012504
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING PROCEDURE:
------------------------------------
The sample was analyzed for eight
metals and six organics listed in
the regulations and according to the extraction and filtration procedures
detailed in CFR, Vol. 45, No. 98,
Monday, May 19, 1980, pp. 33121-33128.
ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED:
---------------------------
Mettler AK-160 Analytical Balance
Perkin-Elmer HGA-400 Graphite
Bne!vel pegCcators
Furnace
Fisher Isotemp Ovens
B&L Spectronic 70 Spectrophotometer
Corning AG-11 Glass Stills
Perkin-Elmer 5000 Atomic Absorption
Millipore Pressure Filtration
Spectrophotometer
and Extraction Assemblies
Perkin-Elmer Sigma 28 Gas
Perkin-Elmer PRS-10 Printer
Chromatograph
Fisher Accument Model 520 pH Meter
LEACHATE TEST DATA:
------------------
Acetic acid requirements were determined from one sample, as listed
below:
Time
Sample Weight: C. grams
Checked mls Added
--------- ---------
(0.5 N Acetic Acid)
mls of 0.5 N
Initial 0
acetic acid
15 min. 0
required to
30 min. 0
adjust to
I hr. 0
5.0 +/- 0.2
2 hr. 0
at different
3 hr. 0
time intervals
4 hr. 0
24 h r . 0
28 hr.
--------- ---------
Total 0
CHARACTFR7STICS OF SLUDGE:
---------------------------
Corrosivity: PH (initial)
4.9
pH (after leachate)
4.9
RC. Box 6 0 Asheboro, NC 27203 0 Phone [phone]
an pnual cmorlunitv GMD10ver

Offices:
Minneapolis, Minnesota
pacem
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Tampa, Florida
Coralville, Iowa
laboratories,
nc.
Novato, California
Leawood, Kansas
Irvine, California
Asheboro, North Carolina
Client:
Holly Farms Foods -3-
Sample: 91140
Location:
Harmony Sludge
Project: 691012504
E P TOXICITY LEACHATE
TEST RESULTS
EPA
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
MAXIMUM
LEVEL
NUMBER
CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATION
DETECTED
--------
------------------------ -------------
(mg/1)
--------
(mg/1)
D004
Arsenic
S.
L 0.005
D005
Barium
100.0
L U.S
D006
Cadmium
1.0
L 0.003
D007
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.0
L 0.01
Chromium, Total
S.
L O:005
D008
Lead
S.
L 0.03
D009
Mercury
0.2
L 0.001
D010
Selenium
1.0
L Ow005
D011
Silver
5.0
L 0.005
D012
Endrin ('1,2,3,4,10,10-
Hexachloro-1,7-epoxy-
0.02
L 0.005
1,4,,4a.5.6,7,8,8a-
octahydro-1,4,-endo,
endo-5,8-dim ethanonaphtha-
lene)
D013
Lindane (1,2,3,4,5,6-
0.4
L 0.005
Hexachlorocyclohexane, gamma
isomer)
D014
Methoxychlor (1,1,1-Trichloro-
10.0
L 0.005
2,2-bis(p-meth oxyphenyl)ethane)
D015
Toxaphene (Technical chlorinated
0.5
L 0.005
camphene, 67-69% chlorine)
D016
2,4-D, (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic 10.0
L 0.005
acid)
D017
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) (2,4,5-
1.0
L 0.005
Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid)
P.O. Box 6 [--,, Asheboro, NC 27203 0 Phone [phone]
an gatial noonrrimitv amnlovpr

Page 1 of 3
Sludge Land Applications/Disposal Report Form
Annual Sludge Analysis
Permittee: Holly Farms Poultry Industries, Inc. (Harmony Plant)
Permit No.: 791IR2
ql�2q,7
Sludge Sample No. -- Date Collected 1011:11_ Location of Sampling_
Parameter Wet Concentration *Dry Concentration **Dry Loading
(m 1/kk) (lbs/dry ton)
PO4 as P
TKN '54) oo 0 10o.0
NH3 as N 0
NO2 + NO3
Cd
o
Oil & Grease
4"1111141000 12-44
Cu
PCB
Ni O* 010
Pb
Zn ISO
Residual Chlorine
***P.A.N. (1) Subsurface
Total Solids JO.12
pH (s.u.) 5g3
Type of sludge (circle as applicable): 1) compost, DAF, aerobic digested,
anaerobic digested, drying beds,
centrifuge, belt press, other
(specify)
*Dry concentration (mg/kg) = wet concentration (mg/1) x 100
% solids
**Dry loading (lbs./dry ton) = .002 x mg/kg
(1) If applied by subsurface injection:
***P.A.N. (Plant Available Nitrogen) = .2 (TKN-NH3 as N - NO2 - NO3) + (NH3 as N + NO2-NO3)
(2) If surface applied:
.2 (TKN-NH3 as N - NO2 - NO3) + .5 (NH3 as N + NO2+NO3)

Page I of 3
Sludge Land Applications/Disposal Report Form
Annual Sludge Analysis
WJLtc,E',f0A()
Permittee: Holly Farms Poultry Industries, Inc. (Razzoay Plant)
Permit N. 7911R2
Sludge Sample No. Date Collected 10:tj-:JLocation of Sampling_
Parameter Wet Concentration *Dry Concentration **Dry Loading
(mL/ kj�) (lbstdry ton)
PO4 as P
TKN Moo vv%
NH3 as N
NO2 + NO3
Cd
Oil & Grease (01101 000 L340
CU 121 01OZ6
PCB
Ni
Pb
ud
Zn
Residual Chlorine
***P.A.N. (1) Subsurface
Total Solids M 31.2±—
ph (su.)
Type of sludge (circle as applicable): 1) compost, DAF, aerobic digested,
anaerobic digested, drying beds,
centrifuge, belt press, other
(specify)
*Dry concentration (mg/kg) = wet concentration x 100
solids
**Dry loading (lbs./dry ton) - .002 x mg/kg
(1) If applied by subsurface injection:
***P.A.N. (Plant Available Nitrogen) = .2 (TKN-NH3 as N - NO2 - NO3) + (NH3 as N + NO2-NO3)
(2) If surface applied:
.2 (TKN-NH3 as N - NO2 - NO3) + .5 (NH3 as N + NO2+NO3)