20201902 Ver 1_401 Application_20210204

OF W ATFq
o� qG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13, 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only
❑ Yes
for Corps Permit:
® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Cambridge Commons Townhomes
2b. County:
Cabarrus
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Concord
2d. Subdivision name:
Cambridge Commons
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Cambridge Corner Associates, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
02487-0127
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Jerry Rigsby
3d. Street address:
2301 Mullis Lane
3e. City, state, zip:
Matthews, NC 28105
3f. Telephone no.:
704-576-1888
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Meagan Jolly
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c. Street address:
328 East Broad Street, Suite D
5d. City, state, zip:
Statesville, NC 28677
5e. Telephone no.:
704-681-3479
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
5539-94-4060-0000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.372889 Longitude: - -
80.544962
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
53.92 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Cold Water Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin Pee -Dee
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently vacant forested land. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of vacant, single-family
and multi -family residential, commercial/light industrial, and office institutional.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.346
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3,852
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The applicant has stated the purpose of the project is to develop the property into a residential subdivision to meet
growing demand for housing in the Concord, NC area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of developing the site for multi -family residential development. Construction of the project
will require one new culverted road crossing, maintenance of an existing culverted crossing, and bank stabilization
proximate to two proposed bottomless arch spans.
Nationwide Permit 29 (Impacts S1, S2)
The proposed road crossing is necessary to provide construction and permanent access to high ground from U.S.
Highway 601 and to meet ingress/egress requirements for the proposed residential developement. The proposed work
consists of installing a 36" RCP culvert, requiring approximately 93.5 LF loss of stream bed, and downslope riprap apron
measuring approximately 14 LF for energy dissipation. The culvert will be buried 6" below the existing channel grade at
inlet and outlet. Riprap will be keyed into channel bed. The enclosed detailed drawing entitled "Herbert Street Small
Culvert Details" depict the proposed crossing.
Nationwide Permit 13 (Impacts S3, S4)
Bank stabilization is necessary to stabilize the stream bank and prevent future erosion at the northern and southern road
crossings of tributary T-1. The proposed stabilization material is riprap with geotextile fabric underlay, 1' thick keyed into
the channel bed. Stabilization S3 is approximately 90 LF along the stream bank, and stabilization S4 is approximately 112
LF along the stream bank. Stabilization will not exceed an average of one cubic yard per running foot below the OHWM,
as measured along the length of the treated stream bank. The enclosed detailed drawings entitled "Herbert Street
Bottomless Culvert Details" and "Chesterton Lane Culvert Details" depict the proposed work.
The northern and southern entry roads incorporate 30' plate bottomless arch culverts to span tributary T-1. A temporary
construction access road may be necessary, but will utilize a temporary span to cross tributary T-1.
Because the proposed activities result in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects,
compensatory mitigation is not proposed.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑Yes ®No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Cambridge Commons Townhomes project proposes to be developed and permitted in three phases, separated as
depicted on the project Cover Sheet and Site Plan. The Cover Sheet and Site Plan show phasing.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P [-IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P [-IT
36" RCP Culvert
T-3
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
3
93.5
S2 ® P ❑ T
Riprap Apron
T-3
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
3
14
S3 ®P ❑ T
Bank stabilization
T-1
® PER
® Corps
6
90
(riprap)
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ®P ❑ T
Bank stabilization
T-1
® PER
® Corps
9
112
(riprap)
El INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
309
3i. Comments:
Proposed permanent stream impacts total approximately 309 LF for culvert placement, bank stabilization, and riprap energy
dissipation.
Proposed permanent loss of stream channel totals approximately 93.5 LF.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired .
61 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible while still achieving the project
purpose. The location of tributary T-3 within the project area necessitates permanent impacts in order to provide adequate
ingress and egress to the site and is unavoidable. However, the crossing was designed with a perpendicular orientation and
with crossing width minimized to the greatest extent practicable to minimize impacts to tributary T-3. Use of an existing
culverted crossing along the same access road further minimizes necessary impacts.
Bottomless arch spans are incorporated into the northern and southern crossing designs at tributary T-1 to further minimize
impacts on -site.
In total, approximately 3,543 LF of streams and 0.346 acre of wetlands are completely avoided and are preserved with the
current site layout.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize impacts to downstream waters. Construction
activities onsite will compy with all conditions of Nationwide Permits 3, 13, and 29.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The preliminary location of Stormwater Control Meaures are shown on the Site Plan included with this application. The
stormwater plan is subject to review and approval by the City of Concord. Once approved, a copy of the stormwater plan
will be available to NCDEQ upon request.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Concord
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in cumulative impacts to jurisdictional waters in the forseeable future.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project proposes to utilize existing sanitary sewer services provided by the City of Concord.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑Yes No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
i Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer. NCNHP Report included with this application. The report lists no
known occurrences of rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary.
i
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
16a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
j 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
jI NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
i governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑Yes ®No
status (e.g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS indicates no known historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts
within the project area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Floodplain panel
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
App lca t/Agent s Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only it an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Contact Name *
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name *
Project County*
Owner Address:*
Is this a transportation project? *
Meagan Jolly
[e-mail]
Cambridge Corner Associates
Cambridge Commons Townhomes
Cabarrus
Street Address
2301 Mullis Lane
Address Line 2
city
Matthews
Fbstal / Zip Code
28105
r Yes r• No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
* 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
* Individual Permit r- Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
State / Province / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below.*
Residential subdivision requiring road crossings for access to internal high
ground.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
12/9/2020
12/11 /2020
12/14/2020
12/ 16/2020
12/ 1712020
RECEIVEDINCDENDWR
FEB 0 4 202t
Water Quality
Permitting
RECEIVEDINCDEOIDWR
i /-
FEB 0t' 2021
Water Qualityeon
Permitting $

Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• 1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
14
1
Submittal Date 12/7/2020

WE
WCAM AMP
1• � 100T
11
49
��
MP•
�!
RpM
G
c+o,.1
NWP29 auluh w►i
sport
Ji
`:ey..
.ram •�• : � � i. ! r
We
4
I APPROXMNTE LOCATION OF LIWAR WETLANDS
AS R)ENY*= IN THE WATERS OF THE U.S. i
! REPORT (TYP.) _
I r l i
` EXIS W GRAVITY SEWER
\WTTM 30' EASEMENT. ACCESS�� .,�t• �'�
SMALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALLTWES
,� \\ � ,' • as � ��' 'I � .
TRACT Ao
,
(PHASE 2,
) \
HATCHED
EX CENTERLINE OF r, '
\ , STREAM (TYP.)
vo
0 13
\\ C Bank dabliftaffon

SITE
46
�r ea
VICINITY MAP
I. _ 2WO.
48 LEASING LLC
DB 11261PO D257
PIN 55399331220000
ZONED: GC
f iCC@ *^nuura+u l
Lkw Tabb
Lbw Tabb
Lbw /
Lw*b
Mvoflan
Lbw /
LwVM
grnoffon
Lf
18.89
S78'091080W
L21
70.85
S81'42'42-E
L2
85.87
S38'34321E
L22
74.08
S47.48.54'E
L3
35.74
518.01'43E
US
48.48
514.3722'E
L4
38.28
331.17'33E
L24
47.80
S0P53.32OW
L5
44.25
S83.34'12$
L25
41M
S53'08'52-E
L8
33.72
Sf0'291191E
L20
44.83
Sf f'S0'3TE
L7
15.43
S1r531590W
L27
SL98
528.47'031E
L8
83.15
S37.4f'27'W
L28
89.73
S30'07'31i
L9
27.83
S08'24'50'W
L29
40.23
S28-40-05-E
UO
94.68
S31'O8'19OE
L30
42.57
S27-32$1'E
L11
71.33
SOS'39'38'W
L31
59.80
S31.40.51NE
L12
69.53
SOW 1'54'E
L32
27.47
S40.12'510E
L13
25.15
S5r05'52'E
L33
45.04
S3r48'37'E
L14
22.88
S38'37'14'E
L15
19.05
S13'31'02'E
L18
21.88
S28.18'19'W
L17
52.80
SWW'160E
Lid
48.26
S10ro2'22'E
L19
59.a7
s1r35'42-E
L20
30.12
S49'35'13'E
\• \
\ �\ EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED TO
ALLOW TURN AROUND FOR
\ \ SEWER MAINTENANCE VEHICLES
� 110,
L24 �.
o
7-71

, � (((((e

RIP -RAP WITH
r-OE0TEXTILE FABRIC
UNDERLIYMENT
--_� -_ 5SC_
5R
PORTION DF WIN
ENTRY ROAD
KEYSTONE TYPE
HEADWALL WITH
WINOWALLS
600 0
590
580
570 10.
0+00
1'H X 3.25'W
1' THICK
0 600
Lo
590
580
570
0+86
NORTH (UPSTREAM)
HEADWALL
SCALE: 1' m 20' (H)
I* = �' (V)
PLATE ARCH
650 650
640 640
630 PROPMD CNADE 630
620 620
610 _. ____._----- 610
t _._.___ . 600
590 - `'Y 590
580 --- —,� 580
570 570
17+00 18+00 19+0020+00 21 +00 22+00
30' PLATE AWN
RIP -RAP WITH CULVERT
QEOTEXTILE FABRIC
UNDERLAYMENT,
O50-61, 1' THICK
CENTERLINE PROFILE OF
NORTH ENTRY ROAD

62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
AOEor Ir Or 1' /Itl • &4w
14+00
15+00 / II
16+00 L
JEXISTING GUN(2) — 12V X 3'H CONTECH SUPER SPAN LOW RISE
CONCRETE FOOTRM OALVAWZED STEEL ARCH OR EQUAL
580
570
550
0+00
ARCH OR EQUAL
NORTH (UPSTREAM)
HEADWALL
SCALE: I' . 20' (H)
1's 2'(V)
650
640
630
POSED cRADE 620
610
600
590
580
v a s' Mc R SA N 570
560
550
17+00 18+00
TYPE
WINOWALL
2 580
570
---------2.aa--- 560
550
0+77
NOW. P THICK
KEYSTONE TYPE
590
HEADWALL
580
570
560
550
0+00
(2) — 12V X
CONCRETE FOOT)
(NO

Review Area
T"F WOODS ON SOUTH UN/01`1
I
Poplar tent
Harrisburg
Concord
�k
Irtt picas', 1
George,,
Locui
1000 feet 250 m
J> Bing
U 2019 HERE, ©O enStreetMa
Project Name: NC Hwy 49 and US Hwy 601
Owner/ Developer: Cambridge Corner Associates
WETt�ANDS city/county: Concord/Cabarrus
, L & WATERS, INC. Tax PIN(s): 55399440600000
Vicinit Ma Coordinates: : Date:
y p Lat: 35.371326 Lon :-80.542496 ScaleGraphic 3.25.2019

Project Name: Cambridge Commons Townhomes
Owner/ Developer: Cambridge Corner Associates
140S
City/County: Concord/Cabarrus
R S , ( N C.
of Wetlands and
Tax PIN(s): 55399440600000
Coordinates:
Lat: 35.371326 Long: -80.542496
Scale:
1 Graphic
Date:
12.08.2020

Property Real ID 11-049 -0038.00
Parcel PIN
55399440600000
Physical Address: No Parcel Selected
Land Units
53.95
Owner Name 1: CAMBRIDGE CORNER ASSOCIATES Land Units Type
AC
Owner Name 2: LLC A NC LLC
Land Value
2549950
Mailing Address: 2301 MULLIS LN
Building Value
0
Mail City: MATTHEWS
Assessed Value
2549950
Mail State: NC
Market Value
2549950
Mail Zip: 28105
Cabams Contyshall notbeheld fablefor anyerrors in ftc
Map Created By Cabarrus County IT Department
datarepiesentedonthsrecord.THstrx9udeserrorsof mission,
Data Sources: Cabarrus County Land Records
1:9,028
comrdssim, concerning the content of the data, and relatue
positional accuracy of the data. The data cannot be construed to
0
412.5 825
be a legal docwment.Pri—y sources fran which this data was
Source: Esri, DigtalGlobe, GeoEye, Earftstar GwgrapNcs, CNESlAirbm
compiled must be consulted foNedficatbn
DS, USDA USGS, AeroGRD, IGN, and the GIS User Community
of informadm represented on this reap document.
0
125 250
Print Date: March 25, 2019
., WETLANDS
: f,
j & WATERS, INC.
Figure 2: County GIS
Proiect Name:
owner / Developer:
City / County:
Tax PIN(s):
Coordinates:
Lat: 35.371326 Long:-80.542496
NC Hwy 49 and US Hwy 601
Cambridge Corner Associates
Concord/Cabarrus
55399440600000
Scale:
Graphic
1,650 It
500 m
3.25.2019

-
•.
' �,t • q. Center
�' Pi
M .t
v
�x.
•
f s
f
a9k�g'sIV
� >r
r S ,
�- i l ih
4
i
t
Mt, iierthon
:. Ch .• _
,
4 ` "fin Seh !
s
t
� 0 0.5 Mi
0 3000 Ft Map provided by MyTopo.com
Project Name: NC Hwy 49 and US Hwy 601
Owner/ Developer: Cambridge Corner Associates
t/ WETLANDS City/County: Concord/Cabarrus
.�. . [ & WATERS, I N C. Tax PiN(s): 55399440600000
Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Figure 3: USGS Topo Quad Lat: 35.371326 Long:-80.542496 1 Graphic 3.25.2019

3
35° 22'32" N
Soil Map—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
3
h
541800 ArA35° 22 32' N
K
a
S
93
a
li!
l
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
LKLLJ
b -
ChA
Chewada sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, frequently
7.3 10.5
vaIife this scale.
flooded
35° 22' 8" N\ I-.P.
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
4.2 6.1%
540800 541000 54110D 541200 541300
54UM
Poo
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15
28.0 40.3%
3
percent slopes
Map Scale: 1:5,160 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5) sheet
PoF
Poindexter loam, 15 to 45
30.0 43.2%
NtS
percent slopes
N 0 50 110 20D 300
Feet
Totals for Area of Interest
89.8 100.0%
0 250 500 1000
1500
Map projection: Web Mercator Comermadhlates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
Project Name:
NC Hwy
49 and US Hwy
601
Owner / Developer:
Cambridge
Corner Associates
City/County:
Concord/Cabarrus
✓ WETLANDS
Tax Pw(s):
55399440600000
& WATERS, INC.
Coordinates:
Scale:
Date:
Figure 4: Web Soil Survey
Lat: 35.371326 Long:-80.542496
1
Graphic
3.25.2019

Project Name: NC Hwy 49 and US Hwy 601
Owner/ Developer: Cambridge Corner Associates
WETLANDS city/county: Concord/Cabarrus
.� & WATERS, I N c. Tax PIN(s): 55399440600000
Figure 5: National Wetland Inventory Map I Coordinates: I Scale: Gra hic (Date: 3.25.2019
Lat: 35.371326 Long:-80.542496 p

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 12/01 /20
Project/Site:Cambridge Comers
Latitude: 35.37183
Evaluator:TB CH PI
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.54454
Total Points:
11.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other SF1
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2 19 or perennial if Z 30'
Ephe eral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2__ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 2
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0.5
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
1
0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 12/01 /20
Project/Site:Cambridge Comers
Latitude: 35.37159
Evaluator:TB CH PI
county: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.54614
Total Points:
18
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other SF2
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2 19 or Perennial if >_ 30'
Eph7eral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 8 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
FTSecond or greater order channel
No = 0
1 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
0
0.5
0.5
1
3

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-mrx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15. paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambride Comers City/County: Concord / Cabarrus Sampling Date: 12/01/20
Applicant/Owner: Rigsby State: NC Sampling Point: DF1
Investigator(s): C. Huysman, P. Isner, T. Bandy Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.372211 Long:-80.547268 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Poindexter F (15-45%) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
APT indicates wetter than normal conditions
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (,minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (614)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (82) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DF1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Ulmus alata
10
Yes
FACU
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Yes
FACW
3.
Diospyros vifginiana
5
No
FAC
4.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
5.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Asimina triloba
2. Acer rubrum
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
45 =Total Cover
23 20% of total cover: 9
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACW
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes
FAC
2.
Lycopus virginicus
5 Yes
OBL
3.
Pluchea camphorata
FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 (A) 210 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.80
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DF1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-4 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-16 2.5Y 4/2 60 10YR 4/1 35 D M Loamy/Clayey
5Y 2.5/1 5 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
X Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
? Redox Depressions (F8)
? Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks
Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambride Corners City/County: Concord / Cabarrus Sampling Date: 12/01/20
Applicant/Owner: Rigsby State: NC Sampling Point: DF2
Investigator(s): C. Huysman, P. Isner, T. Bandy Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.371982 Long:-80.545706 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Poindexter F (15-45%) NW classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
APT indicates wetter than normal conditions
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (B14)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 14
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DF2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
45
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Li►iodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Quercus phellos
2
Yes
FAC
FAC species 57 x 3 = 171
2.
Acer rubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 9 x 4 = 36
3.
UPL species 2 x 5 = 10
4.
Column Totals: 68 (A) 217 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.19
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
7
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
4
20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Geum canadense
2
No
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Allium allegheniense
2
No
UPL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It
9.
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
4
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax bona-nox
2
No
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
1
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116- 4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DF2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-16 10YR 4/3 80 10YR 5/4 20 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Pll It. I 1 %—%..INII.LA6ll1 V J 1\\/1 I I OUN 1 \CAI 1%4%. eJU-,P%.%..1 V1 / I Vim0 -lr% J it y VIV►J {.AI I IIJLVI 1\.lAl VIII I IS.Ae.%JI
12
10
/ 2020-12-01
d
20 0-11-01
2 20- 02 /
F]
111%.Uww VI 1%
— Daily Total
— 30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
0 i - f. - F. - 1, - '. - I , 'I - Y r t
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021
Coordinates
35.371982,-80.545706
Observation Date
2020-12-01
Elevation (ft)
585.12
Drought Index (PDSI)
Not available (2020-11)
WebWIMP HZO Balance
Wet Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipltetion Tool
Version 1.0
e
" T
�-
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
3011 %ile (in)
7011 %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2020-12-01
2.229528
3.843701
7.377953
Wet
3
3
9
2020-11-01
1.791732
4.664961
4.720473
Wet
3
2
6
2020-10-02
2.745276
5.384252
4.326772
Normal
2
1
2
Result
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days (Normal)
Days (Antecedent)
CONCORD
35.4111,-80.5833
700.131
3.434
115.011
1.94
11347
90
CONCORD 1.8 ENE
35.4135,-80.564
675.853
3.048
90.733
1.648
2
0
CONCORD 4.5 SW
35.3647,-80.655
636.155
6.178
51.035
3.096
4
0

■211110111 Roy Cooper. Governor
_mx• NC DEPARTMENT OF
■0880 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Susi Hamilton, Secretary
Susan Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-8547
March 25, 2019
Meagan Jolly
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
529 North Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: 49/601 Project Area
Dear Meagan Jolly:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates
that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
hops://www.fws.aov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerCa�ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
49/601 Project Area
March 25, 2019
NCNHDE-8547
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
Cabarrus County Open Space Cabarrus County: multiple local Local Government
government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 25, 2019; source: NCNHP, Ql Jar
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

N
W+E
S
March 25, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-8547: 49/601 Project Area
Page 3 of 3
1:24,009
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources. Esri, HERE, Garmn. Intermap, increment P Corp., GESCO, USGS.
FAC,. NPS. NRCAN. GwBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), sWsstopo, ® OpenStmetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community

'v' if 1 4_� acts a 7
NIGb,�,.,,',,,yt�'$' �,.- ``°r—........•_ h µ F$ �•j, �"XiF{�,��� } .` � � t �:, b� .r, �����'-�
-WA
71
OD I
t
LL.
}
v i
i
00
At
Y..i.. ;..fie+•- ...r't t t �,r ! s' ,i;. # rs'-y �f K:'�
00� _
"'_ "`' 7 0,
Ln L,
*S•:
Jwa -. -• , e - . ' E r� O
go
CM
itr aAVt
• „ ` -14
tl
Z fV
. ,
ice/ \LWA
70
_

• 4 r
y r
��
�k
k�
7�1 -..T .

35.37317°N 080.54703°W ± 24 ft WGS84
270 deg(T), 621 ft, 2020--11-24 09:08:38-05:00
TI All,
a
t.
3
J 1
x
o-
....
r 10 a
4
r4
Av
_. ��1✓ ��� a `-" x - �'�u ae!^.i- ,✓
1
WI 't'
• � ". rr _ � s ai
1 r. h
r
VAi
jf
Cambridge Corners
Intermittent T2 upstream existing pipe

spueldn ut deal luawzpaS toa
si aua oD a6pza qweD
! �. - _ } ,� - •' .ems$ . g� 3 -`1) .'.,�•:. R1
00
lOr
""I.6ft 4W,-q
`. �' � i •...r � 'a}... a s � - .tA _ + r . _ %�...Ati"'rT + ��.�a
ti.. `►
� • t s-3
y
a
_wA
f : '
}
fly
OK
Woll
{
S y�
•� 1. � ♦p��� � " - �y
'`K � r ' tic. ' ` 1 .. � r - ! � ' � /� --.x' � p�'Y a•-'�"i. r ": r �... � ,
.� ,F��� r. .� .�:i � ,sue � yt• �� ._ �{ .-•. , w -� _ � R ` i i/ �i�
i°— � 1' Y `'gg((J. jp�,:Jt `� i` 1 4`<E �` 'i ,: ����' .� .. � fe i • � ` _� r ^_ � •
t t i(( r� ?!y�� i ! ` 7t „� "ram' .1" 5r•} 'af}''ty
i
' 'rUt � �-. .. f' � i� _ (a '" 1 �:. � (� - -may` .�•'�� i.6 :+Ao* 1_,r `r c F :•i r �{ . ."t T �,-:Jig$•` . _. .- `'\
00:S0-FI:VS:ZI 10-ZT-0ZOZ '11 V09 '(1)6aP 6LZ

35.37459°N 080.54180°W ± 59 ft WGS84
43 deg(T), 606 ft, 2020-12-01 12:05:36--05:00
AW
,
' ^w
,
�1
F ,
'$ AI + �
y
r
fl d
u
»�
�''L, d • � y,..'. ;# i . -�,�,`rtj ` 'AILmar, .-�+►"'r
i t
„ J. C '•5F
� �� � � i .'�.. �!""«'"- tr�p • Mi ^ems• .A a. � ..�,.,^. -w
,
.r
/ 9Z, it`tr..
Y jo
w
s'
4
-
M ,
Camb ridge Corners
P1E Ephemeral

35.37463°N 080.54141°W ± 36 ft WG584
8 deg(T), 592 ft, 2020-12-01 12:10:58-05:00
a. • ra4�r.q.'� � 1 ` � .y � � ��*� ♦ M 4 � :�P~ f � ,-"� �' � 'fix 'ti� ``'�,"
Z.
t.
iY
,-
w.
r
ram'
r
� m
i
4
, .a
,
1`
y
j: `.. .. � � .yi y - •i? , 6 �: YI �, ems. ,�
T
t
r
1.
•� 1a �: O
Mi
x '
w.,
e
r
.. • w .
,t
a
1 / —"•
Cambridge Corners
End TI-E. Intermittent Trib

35.37459°N
080.54141°W
± 20
ft WGS84
71 deg(T), 596
ft, 2020-12-01
12:11:21-05:00
- Cambridge Corners
T1-E. Intermittent Trib

35.37467°N 080.54143°W ± 43 ft WGS84
275 deg(T), 593 ft, 2020-12-01 12:12:14-05:00
rAb r
fy� -
t a.
nr '
ki
f
Pr .,
r
g j j
c ' ram:: Nti ; �' xP 1r
>+A'" J_Ir44
x"'�i
OP
#-Ak
44
rw
�y �p
a
At
.
AL
AA
� c
v
Cambridge Cornersf
Above T1-E . ephemeral "

35.37306°N 080.54452°W ± 62 ft WG584
205 deg(T), 591 ft, 2020-12-01 12:27:55-05:00
w
,
t
T
7
_
yc �►
a •.
-/C. rt/r,, r.Mr �a i,,. mow,. t r •{+�� .*t, �; 4' �n,I; r
R f J
._. •, K +' � .� ��g'. A�+ . � ,....a••,.
WA
r r 11115
/� -� r_ � P �•�� � ��� •���V'" .i ,fir ,.� � i _ f 'y.
v
w.
y .
4L.yam
�`�!".:�`. f• ._ »„ ': „ _,� �. � _ _. � #• ����� �,.: .� „'�` �•',�' � ,ter!
{
7
AN
4(1�
_ w
VI
Ir
s
sY.R
r y
Cambridge Corners
P2-E. ephemeral

35.37330°N 080.54499°W ± 45 ft WGS84
198 deg(T), 587 ft, 2020-12-01 12:32:22-05:00
-74117-7
Ai
Am
A hi
ft
143
JIM
akv
... f�' 4 ../�I'> ....7 1� 14 ,;'_R R .:cL t r � � � ` ��F.,, to ✓!1��5r.�:'�
4
is l.. '•� , a . r rr' _ �.
.r.
r► /'
'rr•, i�. :�4'r �>t►. � j.,r ,., z1w_ M—•\ � � � '�;P 11► . y .« r '-` .
,
e. � y �. `:A✓y . , '� � , "' '� "s ,jam_ � w+ t y r ~ Aj, -. �:e�
ty .} ,V
y a
Cambridge Corners
P2-W sewer NJ incidental hg construction

35.37354°N 080.54523°W ± 51 ft WGS84
348 deg(T), 592 ft, 2020-12-01 12:37:43-05:00
fn
IL
, A
x"
�"�'f `;w �•y ill' ,1'' » ,y "" fir}= ° ���,�.., } � � ���� ����+ ,, I_-. �W
""!F. + .�" # .:�° �• t �,+�r.+'t'r�a, +!.i+.IWA
dui � +dt�}.0 t +4,
��, i�r� �..
r z
Y♦ ,
b
Al
�{ Cambridge Corners
P3—W sewer typical. FP NHS

35.37225ON 080-54436OW ± 47 ft WGS84
306 deg(T), 578 ft, 2020-12-01 12:53:24-05:00
v
A4q
A 0
ar
A* Jill,,
if
Jill!
it
Cambridge Corners
P4-E tVDical FP NHS

35.37227°N 080.54363°W ± 63 ft WGS84 k
96 deg(T), 594 ft, 2020-12-01 12:57:24-05:00:
�f
a3. Y
� • 4► a
i
✓R \t f
L
Y � n
41
44
yyyy�I� • '
♦rr
y'u'y f� • -.,� ,+w e•. ,a .i�� a .`''1 I I j✓� .
' :'N'!• '1E' ��.*, y_ '�Lt b. Y . �YM\8 i . o f �i
TOM
IYO
sER .�'1 i ' ��jy�'� '-� -s �... -"". �` ,.. .t�,p�„ ,;� •• :;l � � :t «rim.
f '
I �
. �" t 9�.,����•'"' ,. �`^ ;.. ,. �.w.>� .♦ .. �� � 4&.- t•� � �. a �•�iY'M�ttif/jj}��r��`,,�, �r''...r1�,,..s�:..
�.# r
•r$a- � r' ,• / �.f.
' .h; �t. A re, ij��' � hi�`i �' \�--•+!4" � r y9 `• M ;`�^ •rii -
Off
, f .
�' `• ` the � �` • '� � � �� ° & r 9 > i ' « � xP r �� t ° � , � i' � p�' M,I A � • � � - �` �1y r1►, •
i
*j
t
lie�
.i • '� P '� '1 (tr ova Y`L "� z„• � �j1yt
,e
Camb ridge Corners
P5—E central ephemeral er

35.37225ON 080.54337'W ± 0.92 mi WGS84
34 deg(T), 593 ft, 2020-12-01 12:58:37-05:00
I -
Cambridge Corners
P5—E central eDhemeral

35.37238°N 080-54323OW ± 36 ft WGS84
26 deg(T), 606 ft, 2020-12-01 12:58:46-05:00
,
M
U' rat 41
'"�I�Mn ',' „h.Y •`" * � '.t:.. �« �"?aliMfa :�, c ..,;, a.^ � 4.. ��yera 9y .r y . "
J •.. �..,�� "a'°"'� ', i. ., '. � d"=Y�+ it `� - - ..p �
+ - .,, • ...., .4{4 "ft 1. i .:. ,
yd
y.� M
Fes• .. + � .+L."'. �... .. � �,
41
i
4
J.
\. e"9 � ��Iny. �,. ,. y, �ur�w+ � �.a. �"r '�'F� +6 ' +"nxy� #' � r �. i,,. asw � '� � n�MC „a .sr'• l W "+y �Y
Ak
F1E i _
AS
a
s•e . - �� x _ ..
ua
« ;,�v ter, ,h• ��'l � ,; t r KA` �
ryk yyfw
r
sR
d .
P y �
�y
A'
low
M
40
I,
Cambridge Corners
v P5-E central ephemeral

35.37094°N 080.54298°W ± 113 ft WGS84
343 deg(T), 571 ft, 2020-12-01 13:03:45-05:00
141
641,
qi
k
_
l ♦ +s e '
r,
� p y
3 � t
A.
ire' �.� �* j . s , � � �� � y� yS:�.Y— .1► , ...
..,r" c�, ,r,' i `. i a !r yY tF j'' • �R ' �,` .. tr ,IF d+ y.ssOoe,�. 'ryatY p p i ;e'•"�.t1'�-.4..
�- i i i/ s %/f jj "ice' r /� - »•
it
Ig
Ire
�� •� � r a, may$
� »Lw
(f
M.
b
.'+i Cam. .*+!" r ,� „ �' r � '•
^ ,
o`• y
•ti
W
kf
fN
5 - .R i*f r'"i��'' - '�I i � .�, - �- ilk _ __• ` *�q
Cambridge Corners
P6 diversion alone toe no connection NHS

35.37095°N 080.54302°W ± 64 ft WGS84
235 deg(T), 576 ft, 2020-12-01 13:03:51-05:00
+
Wil
T�I - 777
• v
w r �
yy6
r� iiii,
n
r
.. 'F Jr . A � r•.`
ter-
+
r,
�. ., ,. a .,♦,.a... - w,
w
".k
•. ,. e :Aw?
i I � t. �♦ �� fir.
Ik-
.� � _ , � , '{�., �>. �,� C, �a.- �} k" �� � ice' I .•s �+
r �
_ r>.A
y�
+
«*
jo
!�°' ...-'I 'i �-.. /� t' � i♦�Gl.,a'„' :s t».1.�,�'•AIIM RIR'iiY�4 ' �'� �Aa � � '�
- Cambridge Corners
P6 diversion atone toe no connection NH

35.37054°N 080.54543°W ± 66 ft WGS84
300 deg(T), 612 ft, 2020-12-01 13:39:45-05:00
� AN,
•;; �4„ '�^'AN �" it �;
,r r. ,r s;„.l i
q P
y r. �•< 3a A-
y 6
�... ,,;� ,... �' ♦ iti *i _ r - ._ 6 � -.r '{?` ,�i
`3S
^ 74
w
,�...,�
VS
or
�(5 4
�Tv-4.Y f v� �7 7`-�•
u
4
" s ^.s`
Cambridge Corners
T2. End Intermittent Trib

♦e
\D Ln «
3 �
V ' }
+_j m� 4
M
♦ 1 ® _ e
N
N 1 ` a
�.
d' t9 ,. f
to N'"�
<f• m'.....
LO tV
46
00 4
6@ 4--
o ® '°``
Ln f'o .
Ln �5+
Ir
i
0

35.37182°N 080.54467°W ± 63 ft WGS84
260 deg(T), 594 ft, 2020-12-01 13:51:48-05:00
� ''� ,� ' - � I « vet `, •:. "� � 6 .�.y +iz
KIM
ry
orw
• "a* ,. " 1� ' � ,: �,.�` � . �i." off , � •� , T,.
s
. a . '� M •' � f4
z,
r
` x
'�.► � !�` `* ti ��T,.. +vase,
�4•e
,�r �F
I
I' r
41
' f
t
y �r
� t
A
Cambridge Corners
P7 Ephemeral Gully

35.37183°N 080.54459°W ± 45 ft WGS84
36 deg(T), 593 ft, 2020-12-01 13:52:03-05:00
IWO
dL
Av
iz r
_:� , f d . x � e R n t ; ��Fk� t c �. rv�: , � tip•. .
� per, �. 1` • .rcr .:.: - < „ y,
e.
S nk,
y r t
„
J
f GAF r !
3
Cambridge Corners'
P7 Ephemeral Gully

35.37180°N 080.54445°W ± 105 ft WGS84
262 deg(T), 593 ft, 2020-12-01 13:59:00-05:0t
per, (lik
01
r •
i
j
e
,a
wVo , ;t
T [
JAN
547,
t .ry a1
r ,
y
er
Aw
.► ' , Ot
S. e.Off
f
�. •- ® ,, p 1, A �, ' a •\
a
AI+r`
fY
Y ;
w
.. r
t� .N
Cambridge Corners
P7 Ephemeral Gutty sc 11.5

35.37227°N 080.54500°W ± 61 ft WGS84
263 deg(T), 587 ft, 2020-12-01 14:19:40-05:00
� '. •" - k `h. mar -. � w s„ • � � � ""��"
ik;t "Alp -
Ay,,
Tr
10
gloom
40
44,
`�_. .. _}� .r 'i a•"¢ r � ! ;� yi� _;fir _ - �y. 4.}� ,*� A.:� 34^3.,
• ' X yt
n
J-
1 '
� r
i Ow i.
�.r
c
Af
,
' !
,,Iw
q
Ilk
•
.. RRWJ l
. r ..., Y .. t• r
y
r f 4izor
w
f "
a'
Ir
,
Cambridge to me rs
NHS 10YR 4/3

35.37166°N 080.54614°W ± 656 ft WGS84
217 deg(T), 613 ft, 2020-12-01 14:46:58-05:00
, r- i c♦
o14
r
r
tr
¢ 5
-6
.S y
s
r
r
l' n
rat► �'!�I'1Mr „'',�..�'. � ' y�� .. -.. T �. + � �', -
� �. r�Y+S: gym,,,,, � r r «+. �.r .;. � - �� .. s ,�}l•ww
�
w
1
'�R .n w+. ww,..'W,' ✓ ;a* '? 1 ^d'°!"ix "' 6' `1w.., _ hYr".,I✓^ f# sr#� +'
l� # s •
16
71... 1
_ a
�" M► '�'
��ray rl
+n,..,......
x
a
.40f „ p
Qys„
ow 4r,
INS:
OIS
OW I�w
C
t
M
Cambridge Corners
NHS 10YR 4/2 no redox Eph 18

35.37165°N 080.54615°W ± 95 ft WGS84
24 deg(T), 608 ft, 2020-12-01 14:47:02-05:00
r iII
re
ORR
s i e
r- a •w ,-.F . �. a
i
r
sk -cci
IF
dy
:
;t tea" x mil; `i' , s
r5 t-: • � ,• ice_ ; , wr_
S ,p "w y
a ,• 4
a - •
aw f .a�s A� /♦ p. .rye 1
14
to
/P u
.0 4 e a
A Cambridge Corners
NHS 10YR 4/2 no redox Eph 18

35.37198°N 080.54574°W ± 60 ft WGS84
228 deg(T), 595 ft, 2020-12-01 15:05:40-05:00
tR
x
x
_ay
Ak,
y ..
Awl -
we
i v
s
^
s` r► � s�
.. 3*j
•..!_p,�'.' � � ._. .s• �+ y� emu., ., 4 ,,,t $.�'. y*1w �� � � d1;.,�".i �� `a„3''a..
y �
.�M n..AVw.y,..
r
'• �5 '!tea �,������. � ,.., - �
4.�. tom. �� � '1�,:�w4�� •� 'r�'� �� ,► yy,;y" •�.,^� ,� _ � �
Lie
OIL
4'
.�' �� -r_. ♦; .�./ e', :� ma's A .. 1. L �� .� �t�' �:'!
r
Cambridge Corners
UPL DF-2