NC0000272_Water Supply Well Sampling Landfill 3_20050808

August 8, 2005
D
D. Mike Cody
^T to c-
214 Camelot Drive 5
Clyde, NC 28721
Mr. Landon Davidson
Regional Supervisor Groundwater Section
NCDENR
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Subject: Private Water Supply Well Analytical Results for Tom and Don Jim ison Canton NC
Dear Mr. Davidson:
As per our conversation, several months ago, attached are the well testing results for the well of Tom
and Don Jimison. I do not agree with the findings of IP and their consultants. They are looking at the
test data as individual tests. When you look at the two wells, ask why such a difference in the data you
begin to ask if the landfill is having an affect on the wells.
Would please review the attached results and let me know what your opinion is of these findings.
Sincerely,
'e�6 /)��& ae
D. Mike Cody

'�E'N.G UN E`E.RTN'.G''&%-'H Y D:R O+G`E-G L O'G.Y.
50 COLLEGE STREET.ASUVILLE,NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FTC. 828.281.3351
www.al tamon tenvironmcd tal.com
April 28,2005
Mr.Tom Richardson
Project Manager, Remediation
International Paper
6400 Poplar Avenue
Memphis,TN 38197
Subject: Potable Well Sampling
Landfill No.3
Canton,North Carolina
Dear Mr. Richardson:
International Paper, Inc.(IP)requested assistance from Altamont Environmental, Inc.(Altamont) in
sampling two potable water wells near Canton,North Carolina in January 2005. This letter contains the
results of the sampling and associated analyses.
METHODS
Altamont met a representative of IP and Mr. Mike Cody at the homes of Tom Jimison and James Donald
Jimison on January 25,2005. Bottles and chains-of-custody were provided to Altamont by Columbia
Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS)and Pace Analytical Services(Pace). Altamont provided instruments to
measure pH, specific conductivity,Temperature,and dissolved oxygen. The instruments were calibrated
in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions earlier on the day of sampling.
Altamont purged water from each of the well systems until water quality parameters(i.e., ph,specific
conductivity,and dissolved oxygen stabilized to within 10 percent of the preceding measurement. At the
Tom Jimison residence,Altamont purged the system through four pump/pressure tank cycles. At the
James Donald Jimison residence,Altamont purged the system through three cycles. The attached Well
Sampling Logs include data measured in the field. A field blank was developed using deionized water
provided by CAS.
Water samples were placed in the appropriate bottles provided by the laboratories. The filled bottles
were placed on ice in coolers. As appropriate,the samples were either shipped by Federal Express to the
CAS laboratory in Jacksonville, Florida or hand delivered to Pace in Asheville,North Carolina.
The samples were analyzed for metals(Method 6020 and 7740), inorganic compounds(Method 300.0,
6010,SM 2340B,310.1, 160.1),organic compounds(Methods 415.1,405.1,410.1, SM 9223,and 1613)
by CAS. Total and Fecal Coliform samples were analyzed by Pace.
P:\IP\CorespondenceSLetter-Potable Well Sampling.doc

INTERNATIONAL®PAPER
Thomas C. Richardson 6400 Poplar Avenue
Project Manager Memphis,TN 38197
Environmental Assets & Initiatives
T 901 419 3878
F 901 419 3962
Tom.Rich and son(a)i r)a oer.com
April 28, 2005
Mr. D. Mike Cody
214 Camelot Drive
Clyde, NC 28721
RE: Private Water Supply Well Analytical Results, Canton, NC
Dear Mr. Cody,
On January 25, 2005 water samples were collected from two private water supply wells
in Canton, North Carolina belonging to Mr. Tom Jimison and Mr. Donald James Jimison.
�. In accordance with our prior arrangements, you had agreed to this sampling date and
were present to observe the sampling activities. The wells were sampled by Altamont
Environmental, Inc. (Altamont) under contract to International Paper Company. Water
samples were analyzed by Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. and Pace Laboratories for
a list of chemical constituents that you had reviewed and agreed to. The purpose of the
water quality analyses was to determine if groundwater drawn from the wells was
affected by the nearby closed landfill.
The laboratory reports of analytical results of the groundwater samples are enclosed.
Also enclosed are two tables summarizing the data and applicable regulatory standards
and guidelines for concentrations of the constituents in drinking water. Iron and pH were
the only constituents in the water sample from the Donald James Jimison well that
showed results outside the limits of regulatory standards. The consultant's opinion is
that the iron and pH values are within the range of natural unimpacted groundwater in
the area. No constituents were detected outside the limits of regulatory standards in the
Tom Jimison well.
An independent third parry expert, CH2M Hill, was retained by Altamont to provide data
validation of the dioxin/furan analytical report from the laboratory. Several congeners
were detected in all samples, but were determined to be the result of laboratory
conditions as they were generally detected in higher concentrations in laboratory and
field blanks than in the well water samples. As described by CH2M Hill in their data
review report, "Both field and laboratory blanks reflect the same detected compounds at
similar concentration levels and would indicate that the laboratory was the probable
contamination source."
International Paper believes that the water quality data developed by this effort
demonstrate that no impact from the nearby landfill is evident. This finding also supports

II
Mr.D.Mike Cody ApH128,2005
Page 2 of 2
the conclusions drawn by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources in their July 1994 report entitled Site Inspection, Champion Landfill
No. 3, Haywood County, Canton, NC, NCD 986188 027, Reference No. 05629.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the data, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Tom Richardson
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Tom W. Jimison
369 Wrightsville Rd.
Canton, NC 28716
Mr. James D. Jimison
341 Wrightsville Rd.
Canton, NC 28716
Tom Ross, IP
Jim McElduff, Altamont

Mr.Tom Richardson
April 28.2005
Page 2 of 3
FINDINGS
The laboratory findings are presented on Tables 1 and 2. Table I includes the analytical data for all
parameters except dioxin. Table 2 includes the dioxin and furan analytical data. The Laboratory
Analytical Reports are attached.
IP requested that Altamont find an appropriately qualified firm to provide data validation for the dioxins
and furan results. Altamont retained CH2M Hill to provide this third party review. A Technical
Memorandum documenting these findings is attached.
The following statements provide a summary of the findings:
Table 1
All but two parameters were either not detected, or were detected at concentrations below the Title 15A,
North Carolina Administrative Code(NCAC), Subchapter 2L standards(21-Standards). The two
exceptions were iron and pH. Iron was detected in the Don limison well at 3.7 milligrams per liter
(mg/L). The 2L Standard is 0.3 mg/L. The pH measurement was 5.61.
Underlying rock in the Canton area consists of biotite gneiss of the Coweeta Group or muscovite-biotite
gneiss of the Ashe Metamorphic Suite. Both of these rock types are relatively high in iron. Locally,the
muscovite-biotite gneiss can be sulfidic("Geologic Map of North Carolina;" 1985; Dept of Natural
Resources and Community Development). When iron-rich rocks are exposed to groundwater,especially
if the iron minerals are iron sulfides such as pyrite,which is typical in this area, iron will be released into
solution. Dissolution of iron sulfide minerals also tends to lower the groundwater pH,and further
increase the dissolved iron content of the groundwater("Study and Interpretation of the Chemical
Characteristics of Natural Water;"USGS Water Supply Paper 2245: 1989).
"Geology and Ground-Water Resources of the Asheville Area North Carolina;'Ground Water Bulletin
Number 16; North Carolina Department of Water and Air Resources; April 1970 presents groundwater
quality data for a four county area adjacent to Haywood County,where Canton is located. This
document shows that the pH range for the four county area is 5.1 to 9.1 Standard Units.
Further,IP reports that Landfill No.3,which is near the Tom Jimison property, was utilized for disposal
of potentially high pH materials. Thus, if a hydraulic connection exists between the landfill and the
limison property, water quality effects could be expected to include high pH, not a lower pH as shown by
the analytical results.
Table 1
Four samples were analyzed for dioxins and furans by Method 1613 (two well samples,one field blank,
and one method blank). Although each of the four contained congeners of dioxins and furans,the
method blank generally contained the largest concentrations. The dioxin congener 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro
dibenzo dioxin(TCDD)was not detected. The dioxin and furan data are summarized in Table 2.
P:1IP\Correspondence\Letter-Potable Well Sampling.doc

Mr.Tom Richardson
April 28.2_005
Page 3 of 3
CH1M Hill Technical Memorandum
The referenced memorandum states that -Both,feld and method blanks reflect the same detected
compounds as similar concentrations levels and would indicate that Are laboratory iras the probable
contamination source. According to established policy set forth in the National Functional Guidelines
for Organic Data Review the compounds detected in the blank samples iromld be viewed«s
contamination and thus the field samples would be flagged as a "non-defect".
CONCLUSIONS
Field measurements and analytical data obtained from the four referenced samples do not indicate that
water quality in the two domestic potable wells has been adversely affected by IP Landfill No.3. All pH
measurements%ere within those found regionally in western North Carolina. The iron concentrations
are also within the regional range of naturally occurring concentrations. These concentrations,
particularly in the Tom Jimison well,may also be atTected by localized geological conditions. With
respect to the detections of dioxin and furan congeners:the third pan data validation concludes that the
contamination originated in the laboratory.
Mr.Richardson, if you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
X(-t-
�1
JaresS. cElduff, P.E.
Attachments: Well Sampling Logs(2)
Tables I &2
Analytical Data Sheets
Technical Memorandum-Dioxin Data Review(CH2M Hip)
P:\IP\Correspondence\Letter-Potable Well Sampling.doc

50 CouEoE SIREEr,AsHEviuE,NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAc.828.291.3351
www.altemontcnvironmental.com
Well Sampling Log
j FACILn`YNAJvIE: DATE: Z
LOCATION:
SAMPLING TIME: SJ
SAMPLING PERSONNEL-. Le,, &cb4k
WEATHER �C Wgrg, 4-0' E
WELL NUMBER. 00 6 P10 WELL DEPTH IN FEET(wD)
: A'!S DATE:
WELL DIAMETER_ WATER LEVELTIME 0')S 3
TYPE OF CASING:. LENGTH OF WATER COLUMN: DjA/11\ FEET
MEASURING POINT: (WD)-(WL)=(LWC)
FLUSH MO TTITICK-UP ONE CASING VOLUME: 14 lirlJl^ GALLONS
I Cimm (LWC)x(WCV)
THREE CASING VOLUMES: AhkAf-" GALLONS
iACTUAL VOLUME r fa L) GALLONS
URGED
WELL CASING VOLUMES(WCV)
'O.17GaYFt 3"=0.38GaVFt 4'-0.66GaLTt 6"—I.5GaYFt 8"-2.6GaVFt 12"-5.SGal/Ft
PURGE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAILER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRuNDFOS OTHEIL.
SAMPLE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAILER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRUNDFOS OTHER:.
READING GALLONS PHUNITS SPECIFIC TEMP(Cc) DISSOLVED OXIDATION COLORAND COMMENTS
PURGED COND. OXYGEN REDUCTION TURBIDITY
(11S) (MBIL) POTENTIAL
(mv)
I
2 /7, .5,
4
5
6
7
8
9
SAMPLING CONTAINER NUMBER OF CONTAINERS REQUESTED ANALYSIS
250 ml PLASTIC
40 mi GLASS
I I,GLASS
OTHER
PROTECTIVE CASING:—PAD:—LOCK. VEGETATION- ACCESS: GOOD/POOR
Sampling Personnel Signature: Date: 77— S-
Notes: pS--raicro-Siemen
mV=millivolt
Hik4
mg/L—milligrams per liter
C*=degrees Celcius
I Zv
P.\Templatm\Blmk Foms\Wcll Sampling Log.x1s
Q!!) Page 1 of 1

50 COLLEGE STREET�ASHEVILLE NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontcnvironmental.com
Well Sampling Log
FACILITY NAME: DATE:
LOCATION: t7MJlMlSoN kerl ct SAMPLING TIME:�(0)
SAMPLING PERSONNEL: WEATHER: c(i.—N 1,ca
S-
WELL NUMBER: LF3 00/ WELL DEPTH IN FEET(WD): DATE' -2,
—L �
WELL DIAMETER.- WATER LEVEL IN FEET(WL): If
—ad/I DATE. TIME:
TYPE OF CASING:—57F-E—L LENGTH OF WATER COLUMN:Zw,l\ FEET
MEASURING POINT: IVA (WD)-(WL)=(LWC)
FLUSH MOUNT/STICK-UP ONE CASING VOLUME:_L�k-tjoll— GALLONS
COMMENTS: 9j—ARC;5 b&LL (Lwc),,(wcv)
I j
, � o") I Sj/?E&ICE THREE CASING VOLUMES: tjjjb,0-P\ GALLONS
O)MIA Lrl)IAL L r7j, -ACTUAL VOLUME PURGED--
JANk,,Mi^N GALLONS
WELL CASING VOLUMES(WCV)
2"=0.17 Gal/Ft 3"=0.38 Gal/Ft 4"=0.66 Gal/Ft 6"=1.5Gal/Ft 8"=2.6Gal/Ft 12"=5.8 Gal/Ft
IPURGE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAMER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUNT GRUNDFOS OTHER:
SAMPLE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAILER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRUNDFOS OTHER:
READING1 GALLONS pH UNITS SPECIFIC
I TEMP(Co) IDISSOLVED OXIDATION COLOR ANDI COMMENTS
PURGED COND. OXYGEN REDUCTION TURBIDITy
(PS)
(mg/L) POTENTIAL
I I (MV)
I C - e
2 +9,7 1
3 A
0 tot
4 C, Mr
5
7
8
9
SAMPLING CONTAINER NUMBER OF CONTAINERS REQUESTED ANALYSIS
256 ml PLASTIC
40 nil GLASS
1 L GLASS
OTHER
PROTECTIVE CASING: PAD:—LOCK: VEGETATION: ACCESS: GOOD POOR
Sampling Personnel Signatur . Date:
Notes: pS=micro-siemenU
my=millivolt
mgtL=milligrams per liter
C*=degrees Celcius
RNTemplateABlank Fomis\Well Sampling Log.xls Page 1 of I

Table 1
International Paper
Miscellaneous Results
Potable Well Samples
Canton, North Carolina
Parameter NC 2L Standard Well 1 Tom Jimison Well 2 Don Jimison CAS/Paee
r Qualifier Qualified�FleldBlank Qualified Units Method
(mg/L) (LF3-001-PWJ (LF3-0O6-PWJ Reporting Limit
Arsenic 0.05 <0.00050 U 0.00043 B 0.00036 B 0.00050 m /I 6020
Barium 2 0.0091 0.0054 1 0.000095 B 0.0020 m /I 6020
Cadmium 0.005 <0.0005 U <0.00050 U <0.00050 U 0.00050 m n 6020
Chromium 0.05 0.00036 B 0.00048 B 0.00027 B 0.0020 m n 6020
Copper 1.3 0.0068 0.00047 B <0.0020 U 0.0020 m n 6020 m
Iron 0.3 0.016 3.7 <0.10 U 0.10 /I 6010
Lead 0.015 0.0041 0.00040 B 0.00033 B 0.0010 mqRl 6020
Manganese 0.05 0.0043 0.039 0.000035 B 0.0010 m /I 6020
Mercury0.0011 0.00033 B <0.00050 U <0.00050 U 0.00050 m-/I 7740
Selenium 0.05 <0.0020 U <0.0020 U <0.0020 U 0.0020 m /l 6020
Silver 0.018 <0.0005 U <0.00050 U <0.00050 U 0.00050 m n 6020
Zinc 2.1 0.026 0.0025 B 0.0015 B 0.010 m /l 6020
Calcium NA 1.5 6.2 <0.50 U 0.5 m n 6010
Chloride 250 0.60 1.1 <0.2 U 0.2 m n 300.0
Potassium NS <2.0 U 2.6 <2.0 U 1 2.0 mg/1 6010
Sodium 160 1.5 5.8 <0.50 U 0.5 m n 6010
Sulfate 250 2.1 12 1 <0.4 U 0.4 m ll 300.0
_ Nitrate 10 0.14 J <0.2 U <0.2 U 0.2 m n 300.0
Hardness NS 8.9 25 <1.7 U 1.7 m /I SM 2340B
Alkalinity NS 7.0 27 <5 U 5 m n 310.1
TDS 500 28.0 83 <10 U 10 m n 160.1
TOC NS <1 U <1 U <1 U 1 m n 415.1
BOO NS <4 U <4 U <4 U 4 m n 405.1
COD NS 3.9 J 2.2 J 2.6 J 5 m n 410.2
Fecal Coliforn Pace Anal tiral NS <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 SM 9223
Total Coliforn Pace Analytical) NS 1.1 <1.1 <1.1 SM 9223
Laboratory H 6.5-8.5 6.42 5.61 NA S.0
Field H 6.5-8.5 6.42 5.61 NA S.U..
Specific conductance NS 51.3 132.8 NA S
Notes:
1. Tide 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code(NCAC),Subchapter 2L Standard.
2."NS"means no 2L Standard(for Sodium or Total Dissolved Solids). Standards are from xx and xx, respectively.
3. US EPA"Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund;Volume 1"; December 1989 states that"if there is reason to believe that the chemcial is present in a sample at a concentration below the
sample quantitiation limit, use one-half of the sample quantitiation limit as a proxy concentrations. The sample quantiliation limit value itself can be used if there is reason to believe the
concentation is closer to it than to one-half the sample quantitiation limit" Also,the guidance suggests that if site-specific information does not indicate that a chemical is likely to be present in
a sample,zero may be substituted in place of the sample quantitiation limit Consequently,three cases are presented in this table for each of the US EPA and WHO TEFs.
4.2L Standard for Dioxin is calculated for total TEF,not for individual congeners.
5."NA"means Not Analyzed
6."pS'means microsiemens
7.Units are micrograms per liter unless otherwise noted. "S.U."means Standard Units.
8.Coliforn results are shown as"Most Probable Number"per 100 milliliters
9.Due to extremely short hold times, US EPA recommends that pH measurements be conducted in the field. As shown,lab and field measurements were the same.
Table 1
April 28,2005

Table 2
International Paper
Dloxln/Furan Results
Potable Well Samples
Canton,North Carolina
Aqueous
Individual Congeners ResuHr Defectlon UnIft Qualifier' Reporting Standards
Um/1
Wall i Tom Jlmison
,3,7,&TCDD < 0.338 0.338 U 10 0.22
12.37,8-PeCDD < 0.439 0.439 U 50 NE
12,3.4,7.8.HKCDD < 0.318 0.318 U 50 NE
1.2.3.6,7,8.HxCDD < 0.387 0.387 U 50 NE
12,3.7,8,9.HxCOD < 0.354 0.354 U 50 NE
12,3,4,6 B.FIPCDD 5.9m OAl2 BJ 50 NE
OCDD 73.607 0.575 BJ 100 NE
.3,7,8-TCDF < 0.507 0.507 U 10 NE
12.3.7,8-PeCDF < 0245 0245 U 50 NE
,3.4.7,8.PeCDF < 0227 0.227 U 50 NE
12,34,78.HxCDF 0.795 0.162 J 50 NE
1,2,3878&HxCDF < 0.177 0.177 U 50 NE
12,370&HKCDF < 0209 0.209 U 50 NE
,3,4,8.7.8&HxCOF < 0.186 0.186 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,6,7,&H CDF 0.885 0.306 BJK 50 NE
l A3.470,&H CDF < 0.415 0.415 U 50 NE
OCDF 4.337 0.337 BJ 100 NE
Well Don Jlmiscm "
.3,7,&TCDD < 0285 0285 U 10 D22
1.2.378.PBCOD < 0297 0297 U 50 NE
1,2.3,4.78&HKCDD < 0.265 0.265 U 50 NE
1,2,3,6.7&H[CDD < 0.321 0.321 U 50 ' NE
12,37,8,&HxCDD < 0.294 0.294 U 50 NE
12.9.4,6.7.8-H COD 6.289 0.522 BJ 50 NE
OCDD 69.053 0.5T7 BJ 100 NE
,3,7,8-TCOF < 0.378 0.378 U 10 NE
12.37&PeCDF < 0,162 0.162 U 50 NE
,3.4,7&PeCDF < 0.150 0.150 U 60 NE
1.7,&HxCDF - < 0.160 0.160 U 50 NE
12.3,8,7,&FbcCDF < 0.170 0.170 U 50 NE
1.2.3,7.8,9-HxCOF < 0.195 0.195 U 50 NE
23.4,6,7,B.HKCDF < 0.185 0.185 U 50 NE
1.2.3,4.6,7,8.H CDF 1,008 0238 BJ 50 NE
1.2.3.4,7,8,9.H CDF < 0.314 0.314 U 50 .NE
OCOF 4.171 0299 BJ 100 NE
Field Blank
3,7,8.TCDD < 0.353 0.353 U 10 0.22
1.2.3,7.8-PeCDD < 0.419 OA19 U 50 NE
12.3,4,7,8-HxCOD < 0.416 OA16 U 50 NE
1,2,3,8,7,29DD < 0.529 0.529 U 50 NE
1,2.3.7,8&HKCOD < OA73 0.473 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,8.7&H CDD 6.895 0.812 BJ 50 NE
OCDD 85.718 0.702 BJ 100 NE
,378-TCDF < 0.552 0.552 U 10 NE
1R3,7.&PeCDF < 0.216 0.216 U 50 NE
.3AXG7 PeCDF < 0.212 0.212 U 50 NE
1,2,3 ,7.&HxCDF 0.930 0.170 JK 50 NE
1,2,3,6,7,&HKWF < 0.181 0.181 U 50 NE
1,2.3.7,8,9-HKCOF < 0.216 0218 U 50 NE
,3.4,6,7.8&HxCDF < 0.194 0.194 U 50 NE
1.2.3,4878-H CDF 1.195 0254 BJ 50 NE
1.2.3,4.78,&H CDF < 0,376 0.376 U 50 NE
OCDF 4.907 DAD4 BJ 100 NE
Method Blank
2.3,7.8-TCDD < 0.596 0.596 U 10 022
1.2.3.7.8-PeCDD < 0.584 0.684 U 50 NE
1,2,347&'DD < 0.547 0.547 U 50 NE
1,2,387&tkCOD < 0.712 0.712 U 50 NE
1.2 3.7 8&HKCDD < 0.634 0.634 U 50 NE
1234.87,0.H COD 5.054 0.763 J 50 NE
OCDD 50.092 0.994 J 100 NE
3,7,&TCDF < 0,382 0.382 U 10 NE
12.3.7.8-PeCDF < 0.421 0.421 U 50 NE
,3,4.7.8-PeCDF < 0.379 0.379 U 50 NE
12.3,4,7.8-HxCOF < 0.326 0.326 U 50 NE
12.3,8,7,&HxCDF < 0.345 0.345 U 50 NE
7 2,3,7,8&HxCDF < 0.391 0.391 U 50 NE
,3A.8.7,8-HxCDF < 0.370 0.370 U 50 NE
12.3.4.6.7,8.H DF 1.315 0.685 JK 50 NE
1.2.3,4.7.8.9-H CDF < 0.888 0.688 U 50 NE
OCDF 4.542 1.047 J 100 NE
Notes:
1.Unh;ere ploograms per Bter.
2.Laboratory QuaOfiers:'B'means anelyte found in the assodeted blank as Well as the sample;'J'indmates
an estimated value used when the aney4e concentration is belay the method reporting limit and above the
3.This ISA,North Cardirm Administrative Cade(NCAC).Subdrepter2L Standard
Table 20joxm Congenen, Apr)2g 2M

1
i
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH21WHILL
i
International Paper — Dioxin Data Review
TO: Jim McElduff
E OOP: Kevin Sanders/GNV
I FROM: Mark Stinnett/GNV
DATE: March 22,2005
Process and background i
The purpose of the technical memorandum(TM)is to present the review of the dioxin data for
samples collected at International Paper.The review was performed on the analytical results from
i water samples collected on January 25,2005.
These water samples were submitted to Columbia Analytical Services Laboratories(CAS),Inc.,in .
Jacksonville,Florida for the following analyses: Metals by SW-846 Method 6010B and 6020,
Mercury by SW-846 Method 7470,Dioxins by method 1613B,and nine general chemistry
parameters.The dioxin analytical fraction was sub-contracted to the CAS laboratory located in
Houston,Texas.
Level H Review Results
The following list represents the QA/QC measurements that were reviewed for the dioxin analytical
data set.
• HoIdine Times: The holding times for the dioxins were evaluated according to method
requirements. The laboratory data reflects that all samples were extracted and analyzed within
the established holding times.No analytical values were affected due to holding time violations.
• Blank samples: One method blank and field blank were analyzed for this event.Both blank
samples indicated the presence of target compounds in their matrix.The same compounds were
detected in the two.native field sample at similar concentrations.This may be indicatative of
improper handling techniques,either in the field and/or in the laboratory resulting in
contamination of the native field samples. See Table 1-1 below for these compounds and the
comparison with the aforementioned blanks. I
• Labeled compound Recoveries: All labeled compound recoveries were within the laboratories I
established control limits.These recoveries indicated no potential matrix interferences affecting
the final analytical concentrations of these samples.
• Lab Control Sample(LCS):All LCS recoveries were within acceptance criteria.These results
indicate that the analytical process within the laboratory were under control at the time of native
sample analyses.
• Toxicity Equivalence Factors(TEF):The TEF is a dioxin toxic equivalent,calculated by
looking at all toxic dioxins and furans and measuring them in terms of the most toxic form of
dioxin,2378-TCDD.The CAS laboratory's Form 3 used to summarize the TEF is taken directly
the EPA reference material.The equivalence factors are the same as listed in Update to
EPA1625/3-891016, March 1989.
•

I
1
Table 1-1(concentration unite are pg/L)
o�
�etg tCompound p 1F�j+ld `ukf arM � 4 ; { .pw ` 3, ; OzOq)P 4.
1234678 HpCDD 6.895 5.054 5.963 6.289
l
OCDD 85.718 50.092 73.607 69.053
(i 12334678-HpCDF 1.195 1.315 0.885 1.009
I OCDF 4.907 4.542 4.337 4.171
123478-HxCDF 0.930 ND 0.795 ND
Conclusion
The analytical methods applied to this data set were in control by the laboratory at the time of
analysis.No field duplicate sample or matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate samples were analyzed
with this sample group. Spike labeled compound recoveries results indicate that the specific sample
matrix did not interfere with the analytical process or the final numerical result.Blank samples show
evidence of low level contamination.Both field and method blanks reflect the same detected
compounds at similar concentration levels and would indicate that the laboratory was the probable
contamination source.According to established policy set forth in the National Functional Guidelines
for Organic Data Review the compounds detected in the blank samples would be viewed as f
contamination and thus the field samples would be flagged as a"non-detect".Overall,the data quality
is within control limit and can be used in the project decision-making process.
1

;L.a 7,zoos ®•
L�olumbia
8540 Baycenler Road Jacksonville, Florida 32256 [phone] ph [phone] fax Analytical
Services"`
An E 1pla)ce-Owned Compmry
J
March 01,2005 Service Request No: J0500343
Tom Richardson
International Paper
6400 Poplar Ave
Memphis,TN 38197
RE: LF#2 Private Wells
Dear Tom:
Enclosed are the results of the satnple(s) submitted to our laboratory on January 26, 2005. For
your reference,these analyses have been assigned our service request number J0500343.
All analyses were performed according to our laboratory's quality assurance program. The test
results meet requirements of the NELAP standards except as noted in the case narrative report.
All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Columbia Analytical Services,Inc.
(CAS) is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items
submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples)analyzed, as listed in the
report.
Please call if you have any questions. My extension is 289. You may also contact me via email
at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
Columbia Analytical Services,Inc.
l
Tom Kissinger
Project Manager
Page 1 of
Laboratory Manager: Greg Jordan
Quality Assurance Officer:Martha Montero
CAS Jacksonville is NELAC-accredited by the State of Florida, #E82502 valid through 6130105.
Other state accreditation include: Arkansas, 988-0600 valid through 1/12/06; Georgia, #904
valid through 6130105; Louisiana, #02086 valid through 6/30105; North Carolina, #527 valid
through 12/31/05; and South Carolina, #96021 valid through 6130105. 1
NELAP Accrediled AGIL sea]of Excellence Award • -- .• ,.,,e,,;- _ — - -

COLUM 31A ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Client: International Paper Service Request No.: J0500343
Project: LF#2 Private Wells Date Received: 1/26/05
Sample Matrix: water
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services,Inc.
(CAS). This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier H data deliverables,including results of
QC samples analyzed from this delivery group. When appropriate to the procedure,.method blank results have been
reported with each analytical test. Analytical procedures performed by the lab are validated in accordance with
NELAC standards. Parameters that are included in the NELAC Fields of Testing but are not included in the lab's
NELAC accreditation are identified in the discussion of each analytical procedure.
Sample Receipt
3 water samples were received for analysis at Columbia Analytical Services on 1/26/05. The following
discrepancies were noted upon initial sample inspection. The exceptions are also noted on the cooler receipt and
preservation form included in this data package.The samples were received in good condition and consistent with
the accompanying chain of custody form Samples are refrigerated at 4t2°C upon receipt at the lab except for
aqueous samples designated for metals analyses,which were stored at room temperature.
Metals by ICP-OES/Metals by ICP-MS
Batch OC Notes and Discussion
Quality control samples for some parameters(i.e.,Dup/Spike or MS/DMS samples)were performed using samples
from another sample delivery group(SDG). The frequency requirement for quality control sample analysis was
consistent with the project's requirements. Matrix specific quality control results have no bearing on sample data
from a different matrix or location. Therefore,control of the batch has been evaluated using the method blank and
the laboratory control sample.
General Chemistry Parameters
No problems were observed with this delivery group.
Subcontracted Analytical Parameters
Dioxin analyses sub-contracted to Columbia Analytical Services Houston TX.
Approved by � ate � d�
2

Data Qualifiers
Inorganic Data
• The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
E The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
U The compound was analyzed for,but was not detected("Non-detect")at or above the MRL/MDL.
Z Too many colonies were present(TNTC). The numeric value represents the filtration volume.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
Metals Data
• The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
B The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
E The reported value is estimated because of the presence of matrix interference.
M The duplicate injection precision was not met.
N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative.
S The result was determined by Method of Standard Additions(MSA).
U The compound was analyzed for,but was not detected("Non-detect")at or above the MRL/MDL.
W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits,while sample absorbance is less than
50%of spike absorbance.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
+ The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than 0.995.
Organic Data
• The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
A The tentatively identified compound is a suspected aldol-condensation product.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GUMS techniques,pattern recognition,or by comparing to
historical data.
D The reported result is from a dilution.
E The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
N The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified,but a confirmation analysis was not
performed.
P The GC or HPLC confirmation criteria were exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40%
between the two analytical results(25%for CLP Pesticides)
U The compound was analyzed for,but was not detected("Non-detect")at or above the MRL/MDL.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to a chromatographic interference.
X See case narrative.
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific
F The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.
L The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product,but the elution pattern indicates
the presence of a greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
H The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product,but the elution pattern indicates
the presence of a greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
O The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil,but does not match the calibration standard.
Y The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the
correct carbon range,but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard.
Z The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.
3

Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project: LF#2 Private Wells/
SAMPLE CROSS-REFERENCE
SAMPLE# CLIENT SAMPLE ID DATE TIME
J0500343-001 LF3001 PW 01/25/05 0923
J0500343-002 LF3006 PW O1/25/05 0953
J0500343-003 Field Blank 01/25/05 1000
5

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received: 1/26/05
Matrix: WATER
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3001 PW Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-001 Basis:NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0091
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 1.5
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0 1/28/05 2/22005 0.00036 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28105 2/2/2005 0.0068
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1128/05 1/31/2005 8.9
Iron EPA3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 I/28/05 1/312005 0.16
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0041
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0043
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1/31/05 1/31/2005 0.00033 B
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 128/05 1/31/2005 U
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 128/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 128/05 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 128/05 1/31/2005 1.5
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.026
6

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received: 1/26/05
Matrix: WATER
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3006 PW Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-002 Basis:NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00043 B
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0054
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 6.2
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0, 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00048 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00047 B
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/29/05 1/31/2005 25
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 3.7
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00040 B
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.039
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1131105 1/31/2005 U
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 1128/05 1/31/2005 2.6
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 5.8
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0025 B
7

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF92 Private Wells Date Collected: 1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received: 1/26/05
Matrix: WATER
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: Field Blank Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-003 Basis:NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00036 B
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.000095 B
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0 1128/05 2/2/2005 0.00027 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00033 B
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.000035 B
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1/31/05 1/31/2005 U
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28105 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 601011 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0015 B
8

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: NA
Project Number: Date Received: NA
Matrix: WATER
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: Method Blank Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-MBW Basis: NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00037 B
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1128105 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 0.090 B
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00073 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 12/2/2005 U
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00026 B
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.000031 B
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1131105 1/31/2005 U
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 -1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0019 B
9

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client : International Paper Service Request : J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3001 PW
Lab Code : J0500343-001 Basis: NA
Test Notes :
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 7.0
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day) mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 3.9 J
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 0.60
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 08:41 0.14 1
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 28.0
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 2.1
Report By:Dlashbrook 10

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3006 PW
Lab Code: J0500343-002 Basis : NA
Test Notes
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 27
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day)mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.89 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 2.2 J
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 1.1
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 08:58 U
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 83
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 12
Report By:Dlashbrook 1 t

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name: Field Blank
Lab Code: J0500343-003 Basis: NA
Test Notes
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 U
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day)mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 2.6 J
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 09:15 U
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 U
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Report By:Dlashbrook 12

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: NA
Project Number : NA Date Received : NA
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : Method Blank
Lab Code: J0500343-MB Basis : NA
Test Notes;
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 19 1 02/08/05 09:30 U
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day)mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 I 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 U
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 U
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
13
Report By:Dlashbronk

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request:J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected:10-5105
Project Number: Date Received:1/26/05
Matrix: WATER Date Extracted: 1128/05
Date Analyzed:1/3112005
Matrix Spike Summary
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3001 PW Unit: mg/L
Lab Code: J0500343-OOIS Basis: NA
Test Notes:
CAS Percent
Spiked Recovery
Prep Analysis Spike Sample Sample Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Method Method MRL Level Results Results Recovery Limits Notes
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 20.0 1.52 22.0 102 75-125
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B . 1.7 91.1 8.94 102 IO2 75-125
Iron EPA 3010A 6010E 0.10 2.00 0.158 2.08 96 75-125
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010E 2.0 50.0 U 52.6 105 75-125
Sodium EPA 30IOA 6010B 0.50 10.0 1.54 11.9 104 75-125
14

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request:J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected:1125/05
Project Number: Date Received:I/26/05
Matrix: WATER Date Extracted:1/28105
Date Analyzed:1/31/2005
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3001 PW Unit:mg/L
Lab Code: J0500343-OOIS J0500343-00ISD Basis:NA
Test Notes:
CAS Percent
Spiked Spiked Relative Difference
Prep Analysis Sample Duplicate Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Method Method MRL Results Results Difference Limits Notes
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010E 0.50 22.0 21.1 4.2 20
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 102 98.1 3.9 20
Iron EPA 3010A 601013 0.10 2.08 2.02 2.9 20
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 52.6 50.2 4.7 20
Sodium EPA 3010A 60I013 0.50 11.9 11.4 4.3 20
15

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request:J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected:NA
Project Number: Date Received:NA
Matrix: WATER Date Extracted:1/28/05
Date Analyzed:2/2/2005
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: Laboratory Control Sample Unit:mg/L
Lab Code: J0500343-LCSW Basis:NA
Test Notes:
CAS Percent
Recovery
Prep Analysis True Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Method Method MRL Value Results Recovery Limits Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.0500 0.0461 92 80-120
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 .0.0020 0.0500 0.0508 102 80-120
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.0500 0.0445 89 80-120
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010E 0.50 20.0 20.0 100 80-120
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0492 98 80-120
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0478 96 80-120
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 91.1 90.9 100 80-120
Iron L EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 2.00 1.90 95 80-120
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.0500 0.0494 99 80-120
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.0500 0.0490 98 80-120
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00500 0.00488 98 80-120
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 50.0 50.5 101 80-120
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0477 95 80-120
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.0500 0.0479 96 80-120
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 10.0 10.2 102 80-120
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.100 0.102 102 80-120
16

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix: WATER Date Extracted: NA
Date Analyzed : 02/01/05
Duplicate Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3001 PW
Lab Code: J0500343-001 DUP Basis: NA
Test Notes
Duplicate Relative
Analysis Sample Sample Percent Result
Analyte Units Method MRL Result Result Average Difference Notes
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 U -U U -
Report By:Dlashbrook 17

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client : International Paper Service Request : J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number: NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER Date Extracted : NA
Date Analyzed : 02/01/05
Matrix Spike Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3001 PW
Lab Code: J0500343-OOIMS Basis: NA
Test Notes
CAS
Percent
Spiked Recovery
Analysis Spike Sample Sample Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Units Method MRL Level Result Result Recovery Limits Notes
Carbon.Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 20 U 18 88 75-125
Report By:Dlashbrook 18

GVLU1vL11A ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : NA
Project Number : NA Date Received : NA
Sample Matrix : WATER Date Extracted: NA
Date Analyzed : 01/26-02/08/05
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name: Laboratory Control Sample Basis : NA
Lab Code : J0500343-LCS
Test Notes
CAS
Percent
Recovery
Analysis Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Units Method True Value Result Recovery Limits Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 250 251 100 85-115
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day) mg/L(ppm) 405.1 198 204 103 85-115
Carbon,Total Organic ' mg/L(ppm) 415.1 50 45.6 91 90-110
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 85.8 92.0 107 85-115
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 7.00 6.62 95 90-I10
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 7.00 6.92 99 90-110
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 300 300 99 85-115
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 7.00 7.05 101 90-110
Report By:Dlashbrook 19

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : NA
Project Number: NA Date Received : NA
Sample Matrix : WATER Date Extracted : NA
Date Analyzed : 01/27/05
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : Laboratory Control Sample Basis: NA
Lab Code: J0500343-LLCS
Test Notes
CAS
Percent
Recovery
Analysis Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Units Method True Value Result Recovery Limits Notes
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 30 35.3 118 50-150
Report By:Dlashbmuk 20

Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Cooler Receipt and Preservation Form
Client: Service Request#
Project:
Cooler received on and opened on by
COURIER: CAS U S FEDEX DHL CLIENT Tracking#
1 Were custody seals on outside of cooler? es No N/A
2 Were seals intact, signed and dated? es No N/A
3 Were custody papers properly filled out? GD No N/A
4 Temperature of cooler(s)upon receipt (Should be 4+/-2 degrees C) T.V
5 Correct Temperature? es No N/A
6 Were Ice or Ice Packs present Yes No N/A
7 Did all bottles arrive in good condition(unbroken, etc....)? No N/A
8 Were all bottle labels complete(sample ID,preservation, etc....)? es No N/A
9 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? No N/A
10 Were the correct bottles used for the tests indicated? es No N/A
I I Were all of the preserved bottles received with the appropriate preservative? <Sa No N/A
HNO3 pH<2 H2SO4 pH<2 ZnAc2/NaOH pH>9 NaOH pH>12 HCl pH<2
Preseivative additions noted below
12 Were all samples received within analysis holding times? Yes No N/A
13 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles?If present,note below Yes No N/A
14 Where did the bottles originate? CA Client
Manuf. Lot#or CAS
Sample ID Reagent Chem ID ml added Inititials
Additional comments and/or explanation of all discrepancies noted above:
Client approval to run samples if discrepancies noted: Dat

SRO: J Gt.:J-2=u� Initials:
Note mal PH is checkW anOl meets me reguirecl PH mlerion Iiste0 in Ore column t cljng wless omvwise nolecl on cooler receipt form.
Bottle Cade
i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 161 111 IS [IS 20 1 21 1 22 1 23 124125 26 27 1 26 1 29 30
40m 4ftL 40mL 40m 12S..1125int 125mL 125m1.1250.L 25 1-2SOmL 250m1. 250m 250m 2�L 500mLISWmL 50ftL IL 1L 1L 1L I 1L 12.14. Sm 16oc Sq I 100mL Ml
COMainer G I G G G P P P P P P P P I P G G P P P P P G G I G I G G G G ENC P Misc.
SeOwn
Pres. HCI never H2S iJ I�: HG H2S MNO3 n^�H2SO4HNO3 WOH NaOH plc HNO3 H2SO4HNO3 IY HNO j HCI HZS 'I• it u5�' 1N�a+. I "
R PH INj/ik 4 ---tW 2 A; 4 4 4 `wA' 4 4 s9 1 >12 eWp`;; 4 'WAY 4 4 FA Q - 4 4 NIA IdA WA WA Ukt"WWI .WA
ISomple#
.001
-003 1 1 1 I
0,
a05
-0os
-097
-0oe
-0os
-010
-011
012
-013
-014
-015
-016
-017
-we
-019
-020
-021
.023
424
-025
-026
-027
-029
-030
-031
-032
-030
-WS
-036
-037
N -03e
N -039
010

6ASColurnbla
Ana"cal CHAIN OF CUSTODY/LABORATORY ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM
^ E�C >• 8540 Baycenter Rd.•Jacksonville,FL 32256•[phone].800-695-7222 xO6•FAX[phone] PAGE OF
w w.caslae.com
Project Name Pmjecl Number
L—V }t W\ ��%W Z'0 S .C 3 ANALYSIS REQUESTED(include Method Number antl
Pm*l Manager Report CC PRESERVATIVE
Company/Address Preservative Key
�5O w 0. NONE
p 1. HCL2. g
43.. H2SO4
NaOH
O S. Zn.Acetate
w 7 6. McOH
Phone I
Q FAX# - ME O Z 7. NaHSO4 I% w Q (J B. Other_
Sempl sS'rypat Sample Primml Nerve
X, Z (J REMARKSI
ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION
SAMPLING
CLIENT SAMPLE ID LAB ID DATE TIME MATRIX
aG1 ')?LJ I- -bS clirs IVw A
V_% 00 Z5-il �1 *�\,1V, I 1.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONSICOMMENTS TURNAROUND REQUIREMENTS REPORTJIEQUIREMENTS INVOICE INFORMATION
RUSH(SURCHARGES APPLY) _I.Results Only
7 STANDARD _II.Results a GC Summaries POs
(LCS•OUR MSIMSD es required)
REQUESTED FAX DATE
III.Resutta a QC and CatbreEm BILL TO:`,�
Summaries
REQUESTED REPORT DATE _IV.Data VaOdetion Report with Raw Data
See OAPP [ _V.Speializee Fame/Custom Report
SAMPLE RECEIPT: CONDRIOWCOOLER TEMP: CUSTODY SEALS: Y N Edata _Yea Na
RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY
N,
W
Sigamre 9g bue _ Sgn6Nre Sgahmm Sigatwe
Printed N '- P p
p Pmintetl Name. Printed Name Primed Name Printed Name
Ant ` 1 Firm Arm Firm Fa
Date/Tune l• O \ omaMme Dogma Daterrme DeteRime
Distribubon:While-Return to Originator,Yellow-Lab Copy,Pink-Retained by Client SCOC-1000-07

Columbia Columbia Analytical Services
Analytical 8540 Baycenter Road
ServiceSi— Jacksonville,FI.32256
An Employee-Owned Company Tel [phone]Fax [phone]
Appendix A
Subcontracted Analytical Results
24

• 7,
olumbia
10655 Richmond Avenue Suite 130A Houston,Texas 77042 [phone] ph (713)2660130 fax An Analytical
An Employee-Owned Company
February 25, 2005
Ms. Mandy Sullivan
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
8540 Baycenter Road
Jacksonville,FL 32256
CAS/Houston SR: J0500343
Project: IP-LF#2 Private Wells
Dear Mandy,
Enclosed please find the analytical results for the environmental
samples we received on 01/27/05. We tested these samples by
Method 161313, as requested.
Our certifications include: FL/NELAP-E87611
All testing conforms to NELAP requirements. Results are to be
considered in their entirety. Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. is
not responsible for use of less than the complete report.
Your report contains jl_pages.
Sincerely,
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Jane Freemyer
Senior Chemist: Projects and Quality Assurance
713-266-1599
jfreemver(c houston.caslab.com
s • 25
NELAPAccrediled 1 ACIL Sea]of Excellence Award

fM1 .v:
Y'A■
n
olumbia
Analytical
Services'
M Emow e-Owwd Comp&W
Dioxin/Furan
Analytical Report
10655 Richmond Avenue, Suite 130-A,Houston,TX 77042
Phone[phone] Fax [phone]
www.caslab.com
26
2

Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. —Houston, TX
Case Narrative—Dioxins/F urans
WNumber
G No.: J0500343 Date: 02/25/OS
ound List: 1613B PCDD PCDF Pro'ect Chemist: Jane Freem er
500343
IP—LF#2 Private Wells
s /Matrix:EB200381A ueous
Data Review Criteria Yes No NA CN#-
TEST RESULTS
1 Were samples extracted and analyzed within holding times? ® ❑
2 Were reported results within calibration range?
3 Were all calculations verified?
4 Were all sample identifications verified?
5 Were sample detection limits reported for all anal es not detected?
Were all manual integrations verified? ❑
7 Were soil results reported on a dry weight basis?Tissue results on a wet-weight basis? ® ❑
8 Was approximately 11 Og s le solid or 1 L sample:(aqueous extracted? ® ❑ ❑
9)For the 1:t extract(with the exception of OCDD and/or OCDF),were all dilutions performed
for compounds above the linear calibration range? ❑
LABELED STANDARDS RECOVERY DATA
1)Were percent recoveries of labeled standards for all samples plus QC within the laboratory
acceptance criteria?
2 If recoveries were outside the limits was the S/N ratio> 10:1 in all cases?
ESTIMATED MAXIMUM POSSIBLE CONCENTRATION MPC
1)For ion abundance ratios outside the acceptance criteria,are the results flagged as EMPC with
a"K"fia
❑ 01
2378-TCDF CONFIRMATION
I Were all 2378-TCDF detections on the DB-5 column confirmed on the DB-225 column? ❑
METHOD BLANK SAMPLES
1) Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process,including preparation and,if
a licable,clean procedures? ® ❑ ❑
2 Were blanks free of detected compounds? 02
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES CSs
1 Was each LCS pre2ared from a source external to the calibration standards?
2 Were all project- used anal es included in the LCS? ❑
3)Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure,including preparation and,if
applicable,cleanup Rrocedures? ❑
4 Was LCS or LCS/LCSD associated with a batch of 20 or fewer samples? ® ❑ ❑
52 Were LCS or LCS/LCSDpercent recoveries within the laboratory C acceptance criteria? ❑
MATRIX SPM and MATRIX SPM DUPLICATE D DATA
1 Were all project-required anal es included in the MS and MSD7
2 Were MS percent recoveries within the laborato C acceptance criteria?
3)Were MSD percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)within the laboratory
C ace tance criteria?
4)IFMS/MSD measurements were not taken,was the batch precision determined by
LCS/LCSD? ❑ ® ❑ 03
ANALYTICAL DUPLICATE DATA
1 Were analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix?
2 Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory C acceptance criteria?
Reviewed by:Int._1Y- Date: Z 25 S 27
R

Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. —Houston, TX
Case Narrative—Dioxins/Furans
Laboratory SDO No.: J0500343 Date: 02/25/05
Method/Compound List: 1613E PCDD PCDF Project Chemist: Jane Freem er
Project No.:J0500343
Project Name: IP-LF#2 Private Wells
Batch Numbers /Matrix: EB2003S/A ueous
Data Review Criteria Yes No NA CN#
METHOD REPORTING LIMITS s
1)Is the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard in the calibration curve ® ❑
reported as the MRL? EJ
INITIAL CALIBRATION CAL
1)Were response factors(RFs)and/or relative response factors(RRFs)within the method ® ❑ ❑
required QC acceptance criteria?
2 Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met?
3 Were the number of standards recommended in the method used for all anal es?
4)Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the ® ❑ ❑
curve?
Are ICV data available for all instruments used?
6 Has the calibration curve been verified using a NIST-traceable second source?
CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CC
1 Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency?
2 Were percent differences within the method-required QC acceptance criteria?
3 Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte of interest?
MASS SPECTRAL TUNING
1 Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning?
2 Were ion abundance data within the method-required QC acceptance criteria?
RAW DATA
1 Were the raw data e. .,chromatograms, spectral data reviewed by an analyst?
2 Were all data associated with manual integrations flagged on the quantitation report 9
METHOD DETECTION LIMIT L STUDIES
1 Are MDL studies for each analyte in a given matrix current,on file,less than a ear old?
DOCUMENTATION OF WATER AND REAGENTS QUALITY
1 Is documentation of the quality of water and reagents used in the analyses on file?
DEMONSTRATION OF ANALYST CAPABHITY
1 Was demonstration of capability conducted according to NELAC Appendix 5C?
2 Is documentation of the analyst's demonstration of capability on file?
3 is documentation of the analyst's proficiency up-to-date and on file?
PROFICIENCY TEST REPORTS
1 Are proficiency testing or inter-laboratory comparison results on file?
LABORATORY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOPS):
1 Are laboratory SOPS current and on file for each methodperformed?
1 NA=Not applicable;
2 CN#=Case Narrative identification number(Completed for an item if"No"is checked.)
Reviewed by:Int. 6P Date: LS 28
4

Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. —Houston,TX
Case Narrative- Comments
borato SDG Number: J0500343
ethod/Co ound List: 1613B PCDD PCDF
ro'ect Chemist: Jane Freem er
Sam le Cross-Reference Table
TCDF Confirmation
ample ID LaboratoryID: Sample Matrix: Dilution: Re 'd?
3001 PW 0500343-001.01 Aqueous 1:1 L
3006 PW 0500343-002.01 Aqueous 1:1field Blank 0500343-003.01 A ueous 1:1
CNit omment
MPC-When the ion abundance ratios associated with a particular compound are outside the QC limits,samples are
01 flagged with a'K'flag. A'K'flag indicates an estimated maximum possible concentration for the associated compound.
e method blank had trace amounts of several compounds. These compounds are flagged with a'B'flag in the
02 associated samples.
e batch precision measurement,MS/MSD,was determined on another client's sample in the extraction batch. The
03 S/MSD results are not included with this report.
Please note the instrument ID on the forms is designated by the first letter;A,B,C or U of the filename field,rather than by the
instrument ID field.
CERTIFICATION
I certify this data package complies with the terms and conditions agreed to by the client and Columbia Analytical Services,Inc.,both
technically and for completeness,except for the conditions noted above. Release of the data contained in this analytical report has
been authorized by the Laboratory Director or designated person,as verified by the following signature.
SIGNED: d ! DAM 151�.1 1/o,J`'�
Xianggiu'Sam'Lian
Laboratory Director S .
Reviewed by:Int._� Date:412 !9/9' 29
5

CASMOU - Form Production, Peer Review & Project Review Signatures
SR#Unique ID T 0 6-,m 8 Y-3
First Level- Data Processing b filled by person generating the forms
e
p ®� Person 1
Date Person 2 or
Second Level - Data Review— o be filled by persondoing
Date 0 t?3 Or Reviewer
Date Reviewer
Project Level - Review -to be filled by person doing project compliance review
Date L Reviewer
30
ti DATA_REV Slrl(4H@005)

-y
M y
Method 1613B/Dioxins & F1lrans 4
Reporting Limits
CONGENER REPORTING LIMITS REPORTING LIMITS
CONGENER ABBREVIATION CAS RN Aqueous Solids
j•
2,3 7,8-Tetrarlilorodibenzo-p-d PG/L NG/SG
ioxin 2378-TCDD 1746-01-6 10 1.0
lA3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 12378-PeCDD 40321-76-4 50 5.0
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 123478-HxCDD 39227-28-6. 50 5 0 "
1 2 3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 123678-HxCDD 57653-85-7 50 5.0 5
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlomdibenzo-p-dioxin 123789-HxCDD 19408-74-3 50 5.0 t
1,2,34,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1734678-HpCDD 35822-46-9 50 5.0 "
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin OCDD 3269-87-9 100 10
2,3,7,8-Tetrachtorodibenzofumn 2378-TCDF 51207-31-9 10 1.0
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran 12378-PeCDF 57117-41-6 50 5.0 "
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofivan 23478-PeCDF 57117-3113 50 5.0
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuraa 123478-HpCDF 70648-26-9 50 5.0
1,25,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 123678-HpCDF 5711744-9 50 5.0
1,2,3A7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofutan 123789-HpCDF 72918-21-9 50 5.0
2,3A6,7,8-Hexachlozodibenzofutan 234678-HxCDF 60851-34-5 50 5.0
1,2,3A6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofurm 1234678-HpCDF 67562-39-4 50 5.0 k
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlomdibenzofuran 1234789-HpCDF 55673-89-7 50 5.0
Octachlorodibenzoforan OCDF 39001-02-0 100 10
Total Tetra-Dioxins * * 10 1.0
Total Penta-Dioxins * * 50 5.0
Total Hexa-Dioxins * * 50 5.0
Total Hepta-Dioxins * * 50 5.0
Total Tetra-Furans * * 10 1.0
Total Penta-Furans * * 50 5.0
Total Hexa-Furans * - * 50 5.0
Total He ta-Furans * * 50 5.0
NOTE:Tissue samples are reported on a wet-weight basis and soil/sediment samples are reported on a dry-weight basis.
fi
!1

Data Qualifier Flags
❖ B Used when the analyte is found in the associated blank, as well as in the
sample
❖ C Indicates the value for the TCDF analyte must be obtained from the D13-225
confirmation column
❖ E Indicates an estimated value—used when the analyte concentration exceeds
the upper end of the linear calibration range
❖ J Indicates an estimated value—used when the analyte concentration is below
the method reporting limit(MRL) and above the detection limit (DL)
❖ K EMPC; maxiumum possible concentration estimated
❖ U Indicates the compound was analyzed and not detected.
❖ X User defined; see case narrative for detailed explanation
B• Y Indicates the recovery of the labeled standard is outside the established
control limits
❖ * Indicates concentration is reported as `Not Detected'
32

Page 2 of 2
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results METHOD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: EB20038-MB
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 08/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: C13655#1
Analysis Date: 3-FES-05 Time: 21:18:06 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13652#12
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L. Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 6.596 U * * 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD * 0.584 U * * 1.04
1,2, 3,4, 7, 8-HxCDD * 0.547 U * * 1.07
1,2, 3, 6,7, 8-HxCDD * 0.712 U * * 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8,9-HxCDD * 0.634 U * * 0.99
1,2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDD 5.054 0.783 J 0..92 1.000 0.99
OCDD 50.092 0.994 J 0.90 1.000 1.02
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * 0.382 U * * 1.08
1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDF * 0.421 U * * 0.93 -
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.379 U * * 1.01
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF * 0.326 U * * 1.21
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF * 0.345 U * * 1.19
1,2,3,7, 8,9-HXCDF * 0.391 U * * 1.26
2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HxCDF * 0.370 U * * 1.14
1,2,3,4., 6,7,8-HpCDF 1.315 0.686 JK 1.27 1.000 1.43
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF * 0.888 U * * 1.41
OCDF 4.542 1.047 J 0.81 1.004 1.37
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.596 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.584 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.547 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 12.470. 0.783
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.382 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.379 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.326 U _
Total Hepta-Furans * 0.686 U
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second .column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613.
33
9

USEPA, BAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND '
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES METHOD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:EB20038-MB
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 08/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5'
Analysis Date: 3-FEB-05 Time: 21:18:06 Sample Data Filename: C13655#1
Ext. Vol(uL) : 20.0 Inj . Vol (uL) : 1.0 Blank Data Filename: d13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13652#12
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L 8 Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(%-), QC ABUND. RRT
CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) RATIO (2) (2)
LABELED COMPOUNDS
13C-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 2000 1795.98 89.80 25-164 0.79 1.008
13C-1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDD 2000 2099.70 104.98 25-181 1.52 1.187
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 2000 2422.55 121.13 32-141 1.23 0.989
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 2000 2081.05 104.05 28-130 1.24 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD 2000 2176.49 108.82 23-140 1.04 1.076
13C-OCDD 4000 3635.90 90.90 17-157 0.88 1.165
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDF 2000 2034.58 101.73 24-169 0.77 0.976
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2000 1983.76 99.19 24-185 1.53 1.145
13C-2,3,4,7, 8-PeCDF 2000 1994.71 99.74 21.-178 1.54 1.173
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDF 2000 2237.83 111.89 26-152 0.51 0.969
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2002.17 100.11 26-123 0.47 0.972
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF 2000 2531.52 126.58 29-147 0.49 1.006
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2063.51 103 .18 28-136 0.49 0.986
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1923 .68 96.18 28-143 0.43 1.050
13C-1,2,3;4,7, 8,9-HpCDF 2000 2216.89 110.84 26-138 0.43 1.088
CLEANUP STANDARD
37C1-2, 3,7,8-TCDD 800 713 .62 89.20 35-197 1.009
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613.
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613. NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273T1
34
in

Form 1 Page 7 of 12
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET CLIENT ID.
Use for Sample and Blank Results L3001 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-001.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol : 890 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Istrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21239#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 19:39:10 Blank Data Filename: C1365501
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.338 U * +
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD + 0.98
0.439 U * + 0.98
1,2, 3,4,7,8-HxCDD * 0.318 U
* 0.
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HxCDD � * 0.387 U * + 0 98 98
1,2,3, 7,8, 9-HxCDD * 0.354 U * * 1. 05
1,2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD. 5.963 0.412 BJ 1. 06 1.000 1.*01
OCDD 73.607 0.575 BJ 0.89 1.000 1.05
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * 0.507 U
* 1. 0
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.245 U * * 1.01
2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF + 0.227 U
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDF 0.795 0.162 J * 1. 8
1.03 1.000 1.23
1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDF *� 0.177 U * *
1,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDF * 1.
0.209 U 1.3232
2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 0.186 U * * 1.18
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDF 0.885 0.306 BJK 1.21 1.000 1.53
1, 2,3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 0.415 U * * 1.48
OCDF 4 .337 0.337 BJ 0.98 1.004 1.25
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.338 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.439 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.318 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 15.042 0.412
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.507 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.227 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.162 U
Total Hepta-Furans 2.701 0.306
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B. indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613.
35

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES E3001 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:J0500343-001.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 890 g Or ML: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 19:39:10 Sample Data Filename: U21239#1
Ext.Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol (ul) :1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(&) QC ABUND. RRT
LABELED COMPOUNDS CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) RATIO (2) (2)
13C-2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD 2000 2514.84 125.74 25-164 0.78 1.011
13C-1,2, 3,7,8-PeCDD 2000 2706.24 135.31 25-181 1.57 1.208
13C-1, 2, 3,4,7,8-HXCDD 2000 2519.90 126. 00 32-141 1.25 0.989
13C-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD 2000 2519.09 125.95 28-130 1.28 0.992
13C-1,2, 3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2000 2323.78 116.19 23-140 1.05 1.069
13C-OCDD 4000 3696.63 92.42 17-157 0.91 1.142
13C-2,3, 7, 8-TCDF 2000 2668.27 133 .41 24-169 0.80 0.972
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2000 2687.21 134.36 24-185 1.57 1.162
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 2000 2627.06 131.35 21-178 1.58 1.194
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2382.72 119.14 26-152 0.53 0.969
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF 2000 2379.31 118.97 26-123 0.53 0.972
13C-1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 2000 2678.34 133.92 29-147 0.54 1.005
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2326.70 116.33 28-136 0.53 0.986
13C-1, 2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 2234.-62 111.73 28-143 0.45 1. 046
13C-1, 2,3,4,7, 8,9-HpCDF 2000 2449.32 122.47 26-138 0.44 1.079
CLEANUP STANDARD
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 766.82 95.85 35-197 1.012
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273TI
36

Form 3 Page 7 of 12
PCDD/PCDF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY CLIENT ID.
Use for Sample and Blank Results L3001 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-001.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 890
g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/O5 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Ext_Vol . (ul) :20. 0 Inj .Vol. (ul) :1. 0 Sample Data Filename: U21239#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 19:39:10 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION TEF(1) TEF-ADJUSTED
CONCENTRATION
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * X 1. 0
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD * X 0.5
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HXCDD * X 0.1
1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1.
1,2,3,7, 8,9-HxCDD * X 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD 5.963 X 0.01
OCDD 5.96e-02
73.607 X 0.001 7.36e-02
2,3,7, 8-TCDF * X 0.1 *
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.05
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.5
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 0.795 X 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF * 7.95e-02
X 0.1
1,2, 3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDF * X 0.1
2,3,4,6,7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1
1,2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HpCDF 0 .885 X 0. 01
1,2,3,4, 7, 8,9-HpCDF * B.BSe-03
X 0. 01 *
OCDF 4 .337 X 0.001
4.34e-03
Total: 2.26e-01
(1) Taken from 'Interim Procudures for Estimating Risks Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and -Dibenzofurans
(CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update(EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989. )
6/90
37
ya

Form 1 Page 8 of 12
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results F3006 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-002.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 960 g or ML: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Istrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. V01 (ul) :20.0 Inj:.. Vol (ul) :1. 0 Sample Data Filename: U21240#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 20:26:,22 * Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L t Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.285 U * + 0.98
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD * 0.297 U * * 0.98
1,2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDD * 0.265 U98
* *1,2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDD * 0.321 U * * 1..1515
1,2,3, 7, 8,9-HxCDD * 0.294 U * * 1. 05
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD 6.289 0.522 BJ 0.98 1. 000 1.01
OCDD 69.053 0.577 BJ 0. 87 1.000 1.05
2,3,7, 8-TCDF * 0.378 U * * 1.03
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.162 U * * 1.01
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF * 0.150 U * + 1. 08
1,2,3,4-,7, 8-HxCDF * 0.160 U * * 1.28
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 0.170 U * + 1.23
1,2,3,7,8, 9-HxCDF * 0.195 U * + 1.32
2, 3,4,6,7, 8-HxCDF * 0.185 U * * 1.18
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDF 1.008 0.236 BJ 1.19 1.000 1.53
1,2,3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 0.314 U * * 1.48
OCDF 4.171 0.299 BJ 0.91 1.004 1.25
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.285 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.297 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.265 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 14.268 0.522,
Total Tetra-Furans + 0.378 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.150 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.160 U
Total Hepta-Furans 3 .569 0.236
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613.
38
14

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES F3006 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:J0500343-002.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 960 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/OS Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 4-FEE-05 Time: 20:26:22 Sample Data Filename: U21240#1
Ext.Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol (ul) :1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(%) QC ABUND. RRT
LABELED COMPOUNDS CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) . RATIO (2) (2)
13C-2,3, 7,,8-TCDD 2000 2601.95 130.10 25-164 0.78 1.011
13C-1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDD 2000 2693.93 134.70 25-181 1...58 1.208
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 2000 2570.91 128.55 32-141 1.25 0.989
13C-1,2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDD 2000 2507.04 125.35 28-130 1.26 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HpCDD 2000 2303.86 115.19 23-140 1.04 1.068
13C-OCDD 4000 3704.05 92.60 17-157 0.91 1.142
13C-2,3, 7, 8-TCDF 2000 2710.84 135.54 24-169 0.79 0.971
13C-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 2000 2738 .60 136.93 24-185 1.56 1.162
13C-2,3,4,7, 8-PeCDF 2000 2654.04 132 .70 21-178 1.58 1.194
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2353 .31 117.67 26-152 0.53 0.969
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2383 .04 119.15 26-123 0.53 0.972
13C-1,2,3, 7, 8,9-HXCDF 2000 2788..97 139.45 29-147 0.52 1.005
13C-2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HxCDF 2000 2323 .34 116.17 28-136 0.53 0.986
13C-1,2,3, 4,6,7,8-HeCDF 2000 2217.75 110.89 28-143 0.44 1.046
13C-1,2,3, 4, 7, 8,9-HpCDF 2000 2432.39 121.62 26-138 0.44 1.079
CLEANUP STANDARD
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 772.99 96.62 35-197 1.012
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273TI
39
7.ri

Form 3 Page 8 of 12
PCDD/PCDF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY CLIENT ID.
Use for Sample and Blank Results F3006 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract:
SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-002. 05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 960
g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Ext_Vol. (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol. (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21240#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 20:26:22 Blank Data Filename: �C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L t Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION TEF(1) TEF-ADJUSTED
CONCENTRATION.
2,3, 7,8-TCDD * X 1.0
1, 2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD * X 0.5
1,2, 3, 4,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1
1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1
1,2,3, 7,8, 9-HxCDD * X 0.1
1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-HpCDD 6.289 X 0.01 6.29e-02
OCDD 69.053 X 0.001 6.91e-02
2, 3,7, 8-TCDF * X 0.1
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.05
2, 3,4, 7,8-PeCDF * X 0.5 * -_
1, 2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF * X 0.1
1,2,3,7,8, 9-HxCDF * X 0.1
2, 3,4, 6,7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1
1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-HpCDF 1. 008 X 0.01 1.01e-02
1,2,3,4, 7,8, 9-HpCDF * X 0.01
OCDF 4.171 X 0.001 4.17e-03
Total: 1.46e-01
(1) Taken from 'Interim Procudures for Estimating Risks. Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and -Dibenzofurans
(CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update(EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989. )
6/90
40
ya

Form 1 Page 9 of 12
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET CLIENT ID.
Use for Sample and Blank Results FIELD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code:. CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-003.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 670
g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05. Istrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. V01 (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21241#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 21:12:57 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L k Solids/lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) . (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.353 U * * 0.98
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD * 0.419 U 098
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD + + 1.
0.416 U * * .1515 '1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HxCDD * 0.529 U + +
1,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDD + 0.98
0.473 U * * 1.05
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDD 6. 895 0.612 BJ 1.00 1. 000 1.01
OCDD 85. 718 0.702 BJ 0.89 1.000 1.05
2,3,7, 8-TCDF * 0.552 U * * 1.03
1, 2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.216 U * +
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF + 1.01
0.212 U * * 1.08
1,2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDF 0.930 0.170 JK 1.47 1.000 1.28
1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HXCDF * 0.181 U * +
23
1,2, 3, 7, 8, 9-HXCDF + 1.
0.216 U * * 1.3232 '
2, 3,4, 6,7, 8-HxCDF * 0.194 U +
18
1,2, 3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDF 1.195 0.284 BJ * 1.
1. 09 1.000 1.5353
1,2, 3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 0.376 U * * 1.48
OCDF 4.907 0.404 BJ 0.94 1.004 1.25
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.353 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.419 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.416 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 16. 011 0.612
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.552 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.212 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.170 U
Total Hepta-Furans 4. 044 0.284
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613.
17 41

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2 : PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES FIELD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:J0500343-003 .05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 670 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10./25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-S
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 21:12 :57 Sample Data Filename: U21241#1
Ext.Vol (ul) :20. 0 Inj .Vol (ul) :1.0 Blank Data Filename: C1365501
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U2123391
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(%) QC ABUND. RRT
CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) RATIO (2) (2)
LABELED COMPOUNDS '
13C-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 2000 2553.68 127.68 25-164 0.80 1.010
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 2000 2680.69 134.03 25-181 1.55 1.208
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 2000 2624.76 131.24 32-141 1.26 0.990
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD 2000 2393.64 119.68 28-130 1..28 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD 2000 2219.06 110.95 23-140 1.06 1.069
13C-OCDD 4000 3493.89 87.35 17-157 0.90 1.143
13C-2, 3,7,8-TCDF 2000 2676.42 133.82 24-169 0.79 0.971
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2000 2680.90 134.05 24-185 1.55 1.162
13C-2, 3,4,7,8-PeCDF 2000 2574.81 128.74 21-178 1.55 1.194
13C-1,2, 3,4,7, 8-HxCDF 2000 2435.97 121.80 26-152 0.52 0.969
13C-1,2, 3,6,7,8-HXCDF 2000 2317.08 115.85 26-123 0.52 0.972
13C-1,2,3,7, B, 9-HXCDF 2000 2716.91 135.85 29-147 0.52 1. 006
13C-2,3,4,6,7, 8-1iXCDF 2000 2297.61 114.88 28-136 0.53 0.986
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 2116.32 105.82 28-143 0.46 1.046
13C-1,2,3,4,7, 8,9-HpCDF 2000 2396.73 119.84 26-138 0.45 1. 079
CLEANUP STANDARD
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 762.38 95.30 35-197 1.011
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273T1
42
1R

Form 3 Page 9 of 12
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY
Use for Sample and Blank Results FIELD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract:
SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-003 .05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol : 670 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Ext_Vol. (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol. (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21241#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 21:12:57 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename:. U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION TEF(1) TEF-ADJUSTED
CONCENTRATION
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * X 1.0 +
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD * X 0.5 +
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1
.1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1 +
1,2, 3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDD * X 0.1 +
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDD 6. 895 X 0.01
OCDD 6.89e-02
85.716 X 0.001 8 .57e-02
2,3,7, 8-TCDF * X 0.1 +
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF * X 0.05 +
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.5 +
1,2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDF 0.930 X 0.1
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF , 9.30e-02
X 0.1 +
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF * X 0.1 +
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF * X 0.1 * .
1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-HpCDF 1 .195 X 0.01 1.20e-02
1,2,3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * X 0.01 ■
OCDF 4 .907 X 0.001
4.91e-03
Total: 2.65e-01
(1) Taken from 'Interim Procudures for Estimating Risks Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and -Dibenzofurans
(CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update(EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989. )
6/90
1a
43

K
AColumbia
Analytical
Servicesmc-
An Fa4D)r-Owns~QwWwW
Accuracy & Precision Data
10655 Richmond Avenue,Suite 130-A,Houston,TX 77042
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
www.caslab.com
44
pn

3DFA
1613 PCDD/PCDF SPIKED SAMPLE SUMMARY
CLIENT ID
Lab Name:: COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES LCS
Lab Code: CAS LAB. ID: EB20038
Matrix: Aqueous (Solid, Aqueous, Ash; Waste)
CONCENTRATION UNITS: (pg/L or ng/Kg) pg/L
SPIKE LCS LCSD
ADDED SAMPLE SAMPLE. LCSIr LCSDW RPD QC
ANALYTE (PG) CONC. CONC. RECOV. # RECOV. # $ LIMITS
2378-TCDD 200 175.175 87.59 50 - 150
12378-PeCDD 1000 776.407 - 77.64 50 - 150
23478-HxCDD 1000 633.919 63.39 50 - ISO
123678-HxCDD 1000 756.731 75.67 50 - 150'
123789-HxCDD 1000 682.770 68.28 50 - 150
1234678-HxCDD 1000 772.437 77.24 50 - 150
OCDD 2000 2037.356 101.87 50 - 150
2378-TCDF 200 183.209 91.60 50 - 150
12378-PeCDF 1000 688,.190 88.82 50 - 150
23478-PeCDF 1000 797.528 79.75 50 - 150
123478-HxCDF 1000 747.870 74.79 50 - 150
12367E-HxCDF 1000 793.599 79.36 5o - 150
123789-HXCDF 1000 *643.098 64.31 50 - 150
234678-HxCDF 1000 760.049 76.00 50 - 150
1234678-HpCDF 1D00 710.196 71.02 50 - 150
1234789-HPCDF 1000 689.175 68.92 50 - 150
OCDF 2000 11563.162 78.16 50 - 150
If an analyte is not detected in either analysis, enter 0 (zero)
as the concentration.
# Column to be used to flag values outside QC limits.
+ Compound outside the QC advisory limits of 50 - 150 '
. EB20038 lcs
45

Page 9 of 9
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results LAE SPIKE
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: EB20038-LCS
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 08/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: C13671#8
Analysis Date: B-FEB-05 Time: 16:56:55 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13671#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L !k Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2,3,7, 8-TCDD 175.175 1.385 0. 70 1.001 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD 776 .407 1.019 1.60 1.001 1.04
1,2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDD 633 .919 1.157 1.21 1.000 1.07
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HXCDD 756.731 1,317 1.17 1.000 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8,9-HxCDD 682 .770 1.253 1.18 1.009 0.99
1,2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDD 772 .437 2.653 1.07 1.000 0.99
OCDD 2037.356 7.204 0. B5 1.000 1.02
2,3,7, 8-TCDF 183.209 1.201 0.77 1.001 1..08
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF 888.190 1.031 1.51 1.001 0.93
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF 797.528 1.010 1.53 1.001 1.01 '
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 747.870 0.891 1.22 1.000 1.21
1,2,3, 6, 7,8-HxCDF 793.599 0.948 1.20 1.000 1.19
1,2,3,7, 8,9-HpCDF 643.098 1.175 1.20 1.000 1.26
2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HpCDF 760.049 1.078 1.21 1.001 1.14
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 710.196 1.781 1.02 1.000 1.43
112,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF 689.175 2.763 1.03 1.000 1.41
OCDF 1563.182 7.362 0.87 1.005 1.37
Total Tetra-Dioxins 175. 175 1.385
Total Penta-Dioxins 776.407 1.019
Total Hexa-Dioxins 2073 .420 1.157
Total Hepta-Dioxins 821. 922 2.653
Total Tetra-Furans 187.355 1.201
Total Penta-Furans 1691. 924 1.010
Total Hexa-Furans 2944.616 0.891
Total Hepta-Furans 1429.443 1.781
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613.
46
22

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES LAB SPIKE
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG NO:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:EB20038-LCS
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: OB/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 8-FEB-05 Time: 16:56:55 Sample Data Filename: C13671#8
Ext. Vol (uL) : 20.0 Inj . Vol (uL) : 1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13671#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L k Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(%-) QC ABUND. RRT
LABELED COMPOUNDS CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) RATIO (2) (2)
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDD 2000 1570.98 78.55 25-164 0.79 1.008.
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 2000 2082.32 104.12 25-181 1.54 1.178
13C-1,2, 3,4,7, 8-HxCDD 2000 2163 .53 108.18 32-141 1.21 0.990
13C-1,2-,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD 2000 2003.96 100.20 28-130 1.23 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2000 1493.29 74.66 23-140 1.03 1.078
13C-OCDD 4000 1379.88. 34.50 17-157 0.87 1.168
13C-2,3., 7, 8-TCDF 2000 1299.76 64.99 24-169 0.77 0.977
13C-1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDF 2000 1937.01 96.85 24-185 1.52 1.137
13C-2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF 2000 1774.66 88.73 21-178 1.52 1.165
13C-1,2, 3,4,7,8-HXCDF 2000 1791.18 89.56 26-152 0.49 0.970
13C-1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HpCDF 2000 1630.43 81.52 26-123 0.49 0.972
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 2000 1791.97 89.60 29-147 0.49 1.006
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1591.70 79.58 28-136 0.49 0.986
13C-1,2, 3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1507.94 75.40 28-143 0.44 1.050
13C-1,2,.3,4,7, 8,9-HpCDF 2000 1385.61 69.28 26-138 0.43 1.090
CLEANUP STANDARD
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 634.92 79.36 35-197 1.008
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273T1
47
.02

F
umbia
Analytical
Services w-
-OWMd 0MVMW
Chain-of-custody
10655 Richmond Avenue,Suite 130-A,Houston,TX 77042
Phone [phone] Fax[phone]
www.caslab.com
48
94

•i<.:„' Intra-Network' Chajn of Custody�,,
8540 Baycenter Rd.•Jacks 739-2UIl onviII4 FL 32256.904-739.2277•FAX 90a- LAs Contact: Tom KjsSVlger
Project Name: IFH2 private Wells
Project Number: m
Project Manager: Tom Richardson
Company: International Paper y�e
Cl
.. Sample Date _.
Lab Code Client Sample ID Matrix Date Time Received O
-_ __ _ O
J0500343-001 L3001 pW Water 70125/05 ' 0923 01,21,05 H
nXO5O43-003
F3006 PW Water 01/25/05 0953 0126/05 II
Field Blank Water 0125105 1000 0126/05 11
Test Comments
DIOXINS_FURANS-1613B 10500343-001 Houston
DIOXINS FURANS-1613B J0500343-003 Houston DIOXINS FURANS-1613B J0500343-002 Houston
tf:
N
FSPecialInstrucdons/Comineats
Turnaround Requtrcments Report Requirements
invoice Information
0��! lV�\'/ (/�(� , `J'1-( _ y�..�y„s .• _RUSH(Surcharges APPIY) I.Basuto Only
PLEASE CIRCLE WORK DAYS _IL Results+QC Summaries
1 2 3 4 5 I J0500343_ill.Results+QC and Calibration
Sunaries
_STANDARD
IV.Data Validation Report with Raw Data
Requested FAX Date: t m
I PQL/MDLJ Y
Requested Report Date: 02/16/05 EDD
lfaRelinquished By. 'tot Received By: r
Jam— Airbill Number.

Service.Re4uest Summary
Folder J0500343 Project Chemist: Tom Kissinger
Client Naa me: International Paper Originating Lab: JAX
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells
Project Number: Due Date: 03/04/2005
Report To: Tom Richardson EDD: IP1 CLNTier: II
International Paper
6400 Poplar Ave QAPP: LAB-QAP
Phone Number: 901419-3878 Qualifier Set: CAS Standard
Fax Number: 901-419-3962
E-mail: [e-mail] Formset: CAS Standard
Merged?: Y
Report to MDL?: Y
Lab Code Client Sample COC Matrix Sample Date Sample Time Receive Date
J0500343-001 LF3001 PW Water 01/25/2005 0923 01/26/2005
160.1 1613B 2340 B 300.0 300.0 300.0
TDS DIOXINS_FURANS HARD_CALC CL NO3 SO4
3I6.1 405.1 410.2 415.1 6010B 6020
ALK_TIM BOD 5DAY COD TOC_T METALS T METALS T
7470A - -
HG T
6020 METALS_T � As Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Mn Se Ag Zn
6010B METALS_T Fe Ca K Na
1613E DIOXINS_FURANS Houston .
J0500343-002 LF3006 PW Water 01/25/2005 0953 01/26/2005
160.1 1613B 2340 B 300.0 300.0 300.0
TDS DIOXINS-FURANS , HARD_CALC CL NO3 SO4
310.1 405.1 410.2 415.1 6010BALK 6020
7470A TR - BOD_SDAY COD TOC T METALS-T METALS T
7470A -
HG T
6020 METALS-T As Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Mn Se AS Zn
6010B METALS_T Fe Ca K Na
16I3B DIOXINS_FURANS Houston
J0500343-003 Field Blank Water 01/25/2005 1000 01/26/2005
160.1 1613B 2340 B 300.0 300.0 300.0
TDS DIOXINS_FURANS HARD CALC CL NO3 SO4
310.I 405.1 410.2 415.1 6010B 6020
ALK TITR - BOD 5DAY COD TOC T METALS T METALS T
7470A ---- -- - --- - --
HG T
6020 METALS_T As Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Mn Se Ag Zn
6010B METALS_T Fe Ca K Na
1613B DIOXINS-FURANS Houston
PR 50

No Pmjcet Lab
ID Clicut Sample Tom, —f.—& Tom,& Calculated Sample
MB ID size Vail wet Dry percent Description
LOS: EB20038-MB Method Blank Grams Semple Sam le Solid Mist,, PH
lUUU
Co.-
ubc
...... .... ....
.. ....... .
50004N,00101
.2 E0500.04.01 E050­0­040-662.01'
................. .........
-ED .0: Jr.:I
985 . .....
7.0 ..........
E0500043 ......
Dark brow.c..clear.fiquid.
rleiiiliq
-002.61 ....................
1050 ....... ......................
BXS-2 Cl
SPI43. aid
...... 0G3 01
..........
................... 6.o Light yell
F0500052 E,0500052-001.01 ...... ow slightly cloudy liquid
............ yeilow. '.
..Jos A&BOUTLETool6�0eratt4yalmid�liq
0500343-001.0 ..........
7.0 Brown cloudy liquid ........
JOS 'L.3601 Pw, .:.
­. ...... .....0643 .10500343-002.05
05DD343%:
.... .......
caTP0...TTR�squ
...........................
E0500054 Llow moderately cloudy
10 :x k 5.0 Light ye-
500054-001.01 705 ...... S 1018011 ...
hdS - looli, Clear c0toilai;3;9q,u,
000554001 Dl: ................
12
E0500057 .. .............
.................... : 11�. --, . 6.0
........ ....... ....... an cloudy liquid
E0500OS7-001 01 CohIMS171713# 880,:.� , , ..'' . .,, :. _­
12 :EWPOST, - . WF§jqjj=li 0', *
Cl,
-,-1.,#2H-W*D 935 qu.I
CPI=SIM�l *-�::��:,;j... 3.0
9.m
W Light
14 ...................
.. E0500058 E0500058-001.01 ...... Yc Ow cloudy liquid
if�. 4;�:
COMPOSITE 1640
is E0500058 ........... 6.5 Cray cloudy liquid
E050005"8-003.OIDUP 66 :L_ .:.;........ ......a ; � , .. - - bl
05�di)Ds .1 .1 1 .. �1 .11 i646: ....oydyfiq
:J.T. T0500059�aw atd�
is E0500058 E050 ......................... 6.5 Yellu-grey cloudy liquid
Y D
s er'p W p
a
.lb
car C,�w P d..... ... ..."'a
d
y clou-Y h
t. cloudy l"10 ..... . .moderately
d
To I. ui IN
d
lear ca --d
wat ly dowdy
4ui4
t Id
on d
.1
dandy h d
g"' U W I. y t
d -d low.8
Noy cloudy IW'
d y-I d
y dy d
I.- cl-U
y
gra c1b 'd ... ..
0058-005.0lMSE) 60 ..... 'a
...... Co 5w dy
all
EMW05"601: f.
...... ... .:..
................. . .....
20 6.5 Yellow gray cloudy liquid E0500061
E050DO61-001.01
':t05lW6i E 1666" 6*
05GOD61-002 01*:'.. X ....... du4j."I, "d
IE050,0061 5.0
E0500061-0.-.,
03.01 ....... . ........... liquid
1070 ...... ..... ............ Cal MW_B
... .... ........ tq, i aid
0 Clear
m1css Squid.. ......
26
SODIUM SULFATE CI-71-2 ...........
ACETONE Cl{&3 smadard: Intmag
TOLUENE ci-74,5 SAND ct�l
GLASSVVOOLGM-14 TPJDECANECJ_742 Mohne ID. D7-17-2B D B(TRACT)ON START. 01/31M5
DICHLOROMETHANE EC
SULFURICACIOCI-743 Volume: 1000W I�L DaRACTION EN[Y. 01r3la
ETKYLACETATE CI
BASIC SILICAGELSI-24.3 SP".r RD RI O(TRACTION METHOD: Sop Funnel
NONANE Cl-67-5 CARBON: c�7� w°A KM XM
HEXANE C1-7X2 AC400SIUCAGELSI-2" Dale: IfJV2W5 U y2 5 TIMESTARTEEY.moo
MUCA GEL SI-22-5 stdd n—,, Rey TUAE FINISHED:15,00
Solefionla- 137-144Affi —
Calmobb,Anxlj�See,INC. Vh.: 100 L �d__ E(TRACTS RECEIVED Ely
S . DHF y10
Kinnear Wk. CID -
1611.3 Doh,: 202010 7 DATE RECEIVED.zWGS
SULUk Amid Cle ,, :2 V,,
area G-vc1oo Col.==5