NC0006033_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (4)

RECEIVED
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FEB - 1 2011
SVIIP SECTION
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Public Utilities Department 155 North Main Street Cramerton NC 28032
Public Water Supply Section Sanitary Sewer Collection System Section Wastewater Treatment Section
January31, 2011
Mr. John Leslie
NCDEHNR/DWO
610 East Center Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Town of Cramerton
Eagle Road WWTP
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
REF: Non -Compliance, Effluent S-BOD5, Eagle Road WWTP
Dear John:
It has been determined that sometime prior to January 14t' a liquid matrix entered our treatment works that caused an
immediate deteriorating effect on our effluent water quality. Under normal conditions our effluent S-BOD5 values average below
the detection level of <2.0 mg/L.
The following table illustrates the data we have collected to date:
Date
Influent
sBOD5
ppm
Influent
TSR
ppm
Influent
COD.ppm
Influent
Conductivity
Effluent
sBOD5
ppm
Effluent
COD
ppm
Effluent
TSR
ppm
Effluent
Alkalinity,
ppm
Effluent
Conductivity
1 /6
174
252
<2
<2.5
490
1/14
149
248
4.3
<2.5
500
1/18
159
188
13
2.7
1200
488
1119
145
164
17.3
2.1
515
1/20
188
216
20.4
2.9
499
1 /21
208
204
21.3
2.4
505
1/24
213
292
149
9.7
56
1.4
475
1/25
224
440
1043
7.8
50
1.6
120
505
1 /26
236
442
51
1.6
120
468
From the standard regulatory sampling protocols coupled with an extensively increased process control sampling regimen we
have determined that the matrix that caused the upset condition originated from constituents in the septage we receive on a
daily basis from Stanley Environmental Services. We have reviewed our records and have requested that Stanley
Environmental begin an extensive internal review of their source logs to determine the origin of the toxic matrix. We have
curtailed all deliveries of septage from Stanley Environmental and will allow no further discharges until we have determined and
isolated the cause(s). One parameter of concern that we found in the Stanley waste -stream was high chlorine residuals, (1.2,
ppm). The constituent was discovered in samples designated' as Aqua water which comes from a potable water supply softener
operated by Aqua, Inc. We reviewed our log reports and found an increased frequency of deliveries from this source that
coincided with the degradation of our effluent S-BOD5 reporting values.

The following table shows this data:
Date
Source
Gallons discharged
12/17
Aqua
2990
12/20
Aqua
2802
12121
Aqua
2886
12/28
Aqua
2936
12129
Aqua
2788
12/30
Aqua
2714
12/31
Aqua
2800
In addition to our own internal investigation we have been utilizing the resources of the City of Gastonia laboratory personnel
and their expertise in such matters. Additionally, during the episode all flows were diverted into the spare secondary clarifier as
a containment measure to reduce any harmful effects to the receiving waters. It appears that as of Monday, January 31, 2011
our wwtp facilities are in recovery and we should be back to operating at near 99% efficiency within seven, (7) to ten, (10) days.
If our operating conditions change or we show indication of further deterioration of our biological system(s) I will notify you
immediately. If you have questions or need further assistance or information please contact me at your convenience.
Sincer y
Hubert H. Hamp , Sr.
Chief Operator
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main St.
Cramerton, NC 28032
Copy: Jamie Shytle, Utilities Director
Michael Peoples, Town Manager

Aia
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Coleen H. Sullins
Dee Freeman
Governor
Director
CEIVED Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NOV 0 $ 2010
November 5, 2010
IP SECTION
611IOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Mr. Thomas Shytle
Public Utilities Director
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Speculative Effluent Limits
Cramerton-Eagle Road WWTP
Permit No. NCO024228
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Shytle:
This letter is in response to the request for speculative effluent limits for expansion flows for the Cramerton
WWTP of 8.0 MGD and 12.0 MGD. This facility is currently permitted at 4 MGD. This expansion is based on
the projected merger of the facilities from the Town of Cramerton and the City of Gastonia. Mr. Don Garbrick
of Pease Associates submitted this request to our office on your behalf. Regionalization of wastewater
treatment systems is strongly encouraged by the Division.
Receiving_ Stream. . South Fork Catawba River has a stream classification of WS-V. Waters with this
classification have a best usage for waters protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and
draining to WS-IV waters; or waters previously used for drinking water supply purposes: or waters used
by industry to supply their employees but not municipalities or counties. There are segments of the South
Fork Catawba River that are listed as impaired on the final 2010 North Carolina 303(d) Impaired Streams
List for low pH and turbidity.
Speculative Limits. The speculative limits were developed based on Division staff recommendation and
consideration of the Lake Wylie total maximum daily load (TMDL) which sets allocations for total nitrogen
(TN) and total phosphorus (TP). Based -on available information, speculative effluent limits for the
expanded discharges of 8.0 and 12.0 MGD to South Fork Catawba River are presented in Tables 1 and 2. A
complete evaluation of these limits and monitoring requirements for metals and other toxicants will be
addressed upon receipt of a formal NPDES permit application.
BOD/NH3 Limits. These speculative limits are based on freezing current permitted BOD ultimate loading
(i.e., facility will not be allowed to discharge oxygen=consuming waste above what is currently permitted).
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwaterdUalitV.orQ /atf/rallff

The resultant limits for BOD5 and NH3 at the expanded flows are considered technologically -feasible.
Nutrient Limits. The Lake Wylie TMDL addresses nutrient loading to that waterbody and has been in effect
since 1996. For the speculated expansion flows, the existing TN loading limit of 103,2821bs/yr will be
maintained but will be allocated for the individual summer and winter seasons. In particular at the requested
12 MGD wasteflow, Cramerton must demonstrate the wastewater treatment plant will be able to meet the
equivalent concentration limits of 2 mg/l summer and 4 mg/1 winter through technology, reuse, or other
treatment scenarios.
TABLE 1. Speculative Limits for Cramerton-Eagle Road WWTP, Expanded flow of 8.0 MGD
Effluent Characteristic
Flow
Effluent Limitations
Monthly Avera e .
8.0 MGD
Weekl Avera e
Dail : Maximum . .. '
BOD5 (April -October)
5.0 m /L
7.5 m /L
BOD5 (November - March)
10.0 m /L
15.0 m /L
NH3 as N (April - October)
2.0 m /L
6.0 m /L
NH3 as N (November - March)
4.0 m /L
12.0 m /L
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum) .
TSS
30 m /L
45 m /L
6.0 m /L
TRC
Fecal coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
28 u /l
Total Phosphorus
0.5 mg/1
Total Nitrogen (summer) ..
42,8341bs/summer
Total Nitrogen (winter)
60,448 lbs/winter
Chronic Toxicity Pass/Fail
(Quarterly. test).
90%
Note: At 8.0 MGD, TN load limits are equal to 3 mg/l (summer) and 6 mg/1(winter).
TABLE 2. Speculative Limits for Cramerton-Eagle Road WWTP, Expanded flow of 12.0 MGD
Effluent Characteristic
Flow
Effluent Limitations
MonthlyAverage
12.0 MGD
Weekly. Average
Dail Maximum;
BOD5 (April - October)
4.3 m /L
6.5 m /L
BOD5 (November - March)
8.6 m /L
12.9 m /L
NH3 as N (April - October)
1.0 m /L
3.0 m /L
NH3 as N (November - March)
2.0 m /L
6.0 m /L
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum)
TSS
30 m /L
45 m /L
6.0 m /L
TRC
'Fecal coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
28 .0 /1
Total Phosphorus
0.33 m /l
Total Nitrogen (summer)
42,834 lbs/summer
Total Nitrogen (winter)
60,448 lbs/winter
Chronic Toxicity Pass/Fail
(Quarterl test)
90%
Note: At 12.0 MGD, TN load limits are equal to 2 mg/1(summer) and 4 mg/l (winter).

Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA). Please note that the Division cannot guarantee that an NPDES
permit for discharge of expansion up to 8.0 MGD and 12.0 MGD will be issued with these speculative
limits. Final decisions can only be made after the Division receives and evaluates a formal permit
application for the expanded discharge. In accordance with the North Carolina General Statutes, the
practicable wastewater treatment and disposal alternative with the least adverse impact on the
environment is required to be implemented. Therefore, as a`component of all NPDES permit applications
for new or expanding flow, a detailed engineering alternatives analysis (EAA) must be prepared. The EAA
must justify requested flows, and provide an analysis of potential wastewater treatment alternatives.
Results of this EAA will need to be presented in the SEPA EA (see below).
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) EA/EIS Requirements. A SEPA EA/EIS document must be
prepared for all projects that: 1) need a permit; 2) use public money or affect public lands; and 3) might
have a potential to significantly impact the environment. For existing discharges, significant impact is
defined as an expansion of > 500,000 gpd additional flow. Since Cramerton's facility is proposing a
discharge of >500,000 gpd flow, the facility must prepare a SEPA document that evaluates the potential for
impacting the quality of the environment. The NPDES Unit will not accept an NPDES permit application
for the expanded discharge until the Division has approved the SEPA document and sent a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) to the State Clearinghouse for review and comment. A SEPA Environmental
Assessment (EA) should contain a clear justification for the proposed project. If the SEPA EA demonstrates
that the project may result in a significant adverse effect on the quality of the environment, you must then
prepare a SEPA EIS (Environmental Impact Statement). Since your expanded discharge is subject to SEPA,
the EAA requirements discussed above will need to be folded into the SEPA document. The SEPA process
will be delayed if all EAA requirements are not adequately addressed. If you have any questions
regarding SEPA EA/EIS requirements, please contact Hannah Stallings with the DWQ.Planning Branch at
[phone].
Should you have any questions about these speculative limits or NPDES permitting requirements, please
feel free to contact Jackie Nowell. at [phone] or Tom Belnick at [phone].
Respectfully,
om Belnick
Supervisor, Complex Permitting Unit
cc: Donald T. Garbrick, P.E./Pease Associates 2925 East Independence Blvd. P.O. Box 18725 Charlotte NC
28218
City of Gastonia, P.O. Box 1748 Gastonia, NC 28053-1748 Attn: Matt Bernhardt
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, PO,Box 33726, Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Attn: Sara
Myers
NC WRC, Inland. Fisheries,1721 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1721 Attn: Fred Harris
Mo-or esville,Regional Office./Surface Water Protection
Pam Behm& Kathy Stecker /Modeling TMDL Unit
Hannah Stallings/Planning Section
Central Files
NPDES Permit File/NC0006033

iK A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr.Michael Peoples, Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main St.
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Terry L. Pierce Dee Freeman
Director -Secretary
®IRECEIVED
VISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 19, 2010 AUG 2 7 201.0
SECTIO
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Re: Water Supply ARRA Loan Application
Project Number DEH-1187
Town of Cramerton
Gaston County
Enclosed is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Offer and Acceptance of Loan for Water.
Supply System Project, PartA (Part A). This letter describes the`steps needed to implement the Part A and subsequent
steps needed to proceed to bid and award of contract.
Please note that the departmental administrative fee amount shown in the Part A is based. on the funding amounts applied
for in the application. An invoice based on any revisions to the funding amounts will be sent with the Part B approval
letter. The departmental administrative fee is due prior to the second (2nd) disbursement.
Next..Steps: -
1. Review the enclosed Part A, sign and return to Public Water Supply Section (PWS)
2
3
Please review the terms, conditions and assurances contained in the Part A. If you wish to accept the -offer, sign and
date Section Ill Acceptance, by the date indicated on page 2 of the Part A.. After signing and dating the Part A,
return one signed and dated original directly to Corey Cavalier, P.E. , Public Wafer Supply Section, 1634 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-16M. Please keep the other signed and dated original for your own files.
Execute the final change order, which triggered this revision to the Part A.
Complete the Part B, and transmit it to PWS for Local Government Commission (LGC) issuance of loan agreement.
After receiving your completed. Part A in Step 1, PWS will forward to you the Offer and Acceptance of Loan or Grant
for Water Supply System Project, Part B - Supplemental Project Information (Part B). You can also download the Part
B from the "Forms" page of the PWS Web site, at the following' URL:
http://www.deh.enr.state.nc.us/Dws/srf/Pages/Other-forms.htm. PWS must review and approve the completed Part B,
and forward the Part B to the LGC for' issuance of a loan agreement prior to the state reimbursing the Applicant for
any eligible costs incurred.
Public Water Supply Section — Jessica G, Miles, Chief
1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Lab Form FAX: [phone] Internet: nccirinkingwater.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
C4%"�
Corey Cavalier, P.E.
Enclosures: Part A (two originals)
Cc�==Britt=Setzer;-Mooresville-RegionalOffice
Bonnie Fisher, U.S. Infrastructure of Carolina, Consulting Engineer
Project File (re.. `cocce'spondence folder)
Public Water Supply Section - Jessica G, Miles, Chief One
1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] l FAX: [phone] Lab Form FAX: [phone] Internet: ncdrin kingwater. state. nc. us Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1Affirmative Action Employer

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality -
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor . Director_ Secretary
April 16, 2010
Mr. Michael'C. Peoples
City Manager
City of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Notice of Violation - Effluent Limitations
Tracking #: NOV-2010-LV-0123
Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
A review of the January 2010 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the following
parameter:
Pipe Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
001 BOD 1-6 mg/l 15 mg/1(weekly average)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The Division of Water
Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the violations are of a continuing nature,
not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may
wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. You may contact Mr. John Lesley of this Office for additional
information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
Ary
r r
Marcia Allocco
Acting Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 One
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorihCarollilia
Internet: htin://oortal.ncdenr.org/sveb/vvg N-durallf
An Equal Opportunity \ Afrmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

Town of Cramerton
Public Utilities Department
Mr. John Lesley
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Notice of Violation
G.S.143-215.1(a)(6)
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Lesley:
166 North Main Street Cramerton NC 28032
January 13, 2010
JAN 2 0 2010
This is the Written Response that your office has requested. I fill out the Monthly D.M.R. for this facility and forward them
to Mr. Jamie Shytle for, his review and signature. Daily, I enter all information on that particulate months D.M.R. When
Mr. Shytle is here I put him down as (Y) that day in the (O.R.C. on site) space. If Mr. Shytle is not here for the day I put
down (B) that day in the (O.R.C. on site) space.
Mr. Shytle is on medical leave at this time. We will let him know that he as O.R.C. needs to sign in upon arrival to WWTP
facilities.
Sinc el
Hubert H. H pDton sr.
Operations Chief
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
copy: M: Peoples, Town Manager
Jamie Syhtle,.Public Utilities. Director

• i 4 R j �
,.. ., ; .
� _ ' '�.' �

SEP - 3 2009
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
155 North Main Street, Cramerton NC 28032
Public Water Supply Section Wastewater Collections and Treatment Sections
Mr. Bob Sledge
Point Source Compliance Branch
NCDEHNR / DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
REF: Cramerton, Eagle Road WWTP (NC0006033)
Dear Mr. Sledge:
Please find enclosed our request and supporting documentation for the Affirmative Defense of Upset under Part II of our
NPDES permit.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me and I will be happy to assist you.
Sincerely:
4-1
Jamie Shytle
Public Utilities Director
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
(0) 704-825-7499
(C) 704-608-4235
i shvtle@cramerton. org

PUBLIC UTILITIES V
155 North Main Street, Crary
Public Water Supply Division W
Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES NC0006033
Affirmative Defense of Upset
ARTMENT
NC 28032
Collections and Treatment Division
The following information is provided per Part E, section C-5 a and b of the NPDES permit number NC0006033 issued to The
Town of Cramerton's Eagle Road WWTP.
Background
The Town of Cramerton owns and operates the Eagle Road wastewater treatment facilities located at 659 Eagle Road,
Belmont, NC 28012. This treatment plant is a 4.0 mgd extended aeration design that was upgraded in 2007 to meet the
nutrients and chlorine residual discharge limits established for the South Fork Catawba River basin.
A chemical feed system was included in the upgrade and consists of seven chemical storage tanks, metering pumps, telemetry,
and other appurtances to provide the necessary chemistry for treatment needs. A specially designed chemical feed building was
constructed to house the tanks and equipment to provide spill containment in the event of a catastrophic failure within the
chemical feeding system(s).
Facilities Unset Cause Identification
On Wednesday, August 5's at 2 pm we received a standard load of approximately 4,000 gallons of 50% NaOH, (sodium
hydroxide). The off-loading was completed and we re -started the NaOH metering pump. The feed system was checked at
4:30pm for normal operation. All the chemical feeding systems were checked for proper operation at 8:20am and at 4:40pm on
Thursday, August 6's and plant operators noted in our logs that all systems were operating normal.
Sometime after 4:40pm the chemical fill line for the NaOH calibration tube broke away from an installed piping union and the
chemical began to drain from the storage tank and through the separated piping into the building floor drains to a small
pumping station located adjacent to the building. Once the NaOH began filling the pump station it was pumped directly to the
main influent line that discharges to the activated sludge basin. At approximately 9:00pm the remote pH probe located at the
effluent end of the aeration basin began to register a value greater than 9.0 s.u. and an alarm condition was activated on our
SCADA system. A high pH value of > 9.0 s u. registered at our aeration effluent was one of the SCADA alarms that were not
included as a critical dial out alarm because at this monitoring point a high pH is considered as after the fact. We do have a
critical dial out alarm for high pH in the influent preliminary treatment area but this monitoring point was upstream from where
the caustic was being pumped into the main line.
Notification of upset to Division of Water Quality
I have included with this document an email I sent to Mr. John Leslie with the Mooresville regional office of
NCDEHNR/DWQ notifying him of the spill and associated upset on Friday, August 07, 2009.

Remedial measures taken
At first knowledge of the caustic spill and associated upset condition we notified our chemical supplier and other mutual aid
members in our area for assistance. Bremitag Southeast was able to re-route a 6,000 gallon tanker of 22% acetic acid from
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities to our facility to aid in neutralizing the caustic effects within our system.
Because of our low flow conditions we were able to direct all effluent discharge to a spare secondary clarifier and our sludge
holding lagoon and thus create a zero discharge condition until our aeration basin became stabilized on Tuesday, August I Ph.
Beginning on Monday the 10's. we made arrangements for Stanley Environmental Services to route all their domestic septage
tankers to our facility for discharge to add additional carbon. Also they transported tanker loads of active biomass from Mt.
Holly's wastewater treatment plant to help in the re -seeding of our secondary treatment basin. We continued this operation of
adding extra carbon and biomass throughout the week and concluded on Friday. August 14'h.
On Monday. August 17s' we worked with Mr. Neal Powell from Brenntag Southeast in attempts to find an active polymeric
blend to aid in clearing up the turbidity in our effluent discharge. We were unsuccessful in finding anything cationic or ionic
that would help reduce the dissolved matter other than heavy dosing with aluminum chlorhydrate. We have continued this
regimen of dosing the effluent with over 50 mg/L and will continue until our system has reached constant equilibrium.
I have sent request to our design engineering firm for assistance in finding the cause of the PVC piping failure that caused the
caustic spill into our facilities and have included a copy of the email with this document. Additionally I had our contract
instrumentation specialist review the chain of events that transpired from the caustic spill and make recoimnendations for
modifications to our SCADA system, field instruments. and other associated equipment so that this sort of occurrence will not
happen again under the same circumstances. I have included a copy of his report with this document for your review.
As the public utilities director for the Town of Cramerton I can say with all faith that the caustic spill and resulting plant upset
could not have been prevented and my staff and I leave met every condition of Part II, section C5, b, (1,2,3,4) of our NPDES
permit. I respectfully request that we be considered uunder this special condition. I understand that a notice of violation should
be issued for our inability to meet effluent discharge limits during this remedial period and request that no civil penalties be
accessed.
If you need any further information or have questions do not hesitate to contact me at 704-825-7499
Sincerely:
,-�e
Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton
Public Utilities Director
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, NC 20832
ishvtle a.cramerton.org

rage i or i
Jamie Shytle
From: "Jamie Shytle" <[e-mail]>
To: "Mike Barnes, P.E." <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Michael Peoples" <[e-mail]>; "Hube" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3.45 PM
Subject: Sch 80 PVC fittings
Mike
We've experienced several problems with the sch 80 PVC unions throughout our piping system
1 on the contact basin sample pump suction line
1 on the effluent sample pump discharge line
4 in the chemical feed building
1 on the influent potable water booster pump discharge line
We can not determine the cause(s) of the failures because they aren't all the same.
On some the socket weld fitting failed and on others the union has become finger -loose. Can you have a
materials specialist on PVC fittings contact me?
I will need some expert input as I finalize my report requesting for "affirmative defense" to the State's
DWQ.
Quick response is requested because of time limitations from DWQ.
ps: What are your plans regarding the recirc pump. If you're buying a new one please let me know the
expected delivery date ASAP, and make sure, it's not just like the old ones. Please insure that all rotating
wetted parts are chemical resistant.
We are starting to see excessive deterioration of the remaining recirc pumps, even with the potable water
flush -lines we added.
Thanks
Jamie Shytle
Public Utilities Director
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
704-825-7499
[e-mail]
8/27/2009

KNC KEN NASH COMPANY, INC SERVICE REPORT
P.O. BOX 252
LOWELL, NC 28098
704-354-0499
CUSTOMER
Town of Cramerton
JOB LOCATION
Eagle Road WWTP
Eagle Road WWTP
UMBEK
Cramerton NC 28032
8/11/2009
BILLING ADDRESS
Town of Cramerton
KNC NUMBER
09C101-0811
155 N. Main Street
Kenneth D. Nash
Cramerton NC 28032
CONTRACT
Attn : Jamie Shytle
DEMAND x
PARTS AND SERVICE
Qty
Desc
Each Total
NOTES:
FIELD SERVICE FOR EAGLE ROAD WWTP
The WWTP at Eagle Road had suffered a caustic soda leak caused by a broken pipe joint, which allowed
the chemical to drain into the drainage trough and subsequently out to the wetwell, from which it was
pumped into the headworks and made its way to the aeration basins.
Customer very concerned about what could be done to help avoid this issue in the future. Chemical bulk
tank levels are monitored by means of a Siemens HydroRanger Ultrasonic Level Transmitter installed on
each bulk chemical tank. These units, in addition to indicating the level of chemical in the tank and trans-
mitting this level to the SCADA System for display, feature several relays. One of these relays is con-
figured as a high tank level alarm to work as part of a system to provide a visual and audible alarm if the
tank is overfilled. Checked out the operation of this system and verified that alarm will be activated if tank
level reaches 95%.
Additionally, the HydroRanger units have the ability to generate a "rate of emptying" alarm which can be
configured to actuate a relay. In that the normal chemical feed rate would be at most, a few inches per
day, this alarm should be able to detect an abnormally high "emptying" rate for a bulk tank. This can be
configured for each of the seven m Siemens HydroRangers and this relay output sent to a small annun-
ciator module which will indicate which of the tanks has generated an alarm. This unit has an audible alarm
built in, and relay outputs can provide a digital input to the SCADA System for an alarm as well as to
actuate a visual and/or audible alarm on the outside of the Chemical Storage Building.
This annunciator module will .be ordered and installed in a small panel adjacent to the Siemens units. The
HydroRangers will be configured to provide this "rate of emptying" alarm, the output signal will provide a
visual and audible alarm outside the Chemical Storage Building and a digital input will be provided to the
PLC cabinet. The SCADA System will be programmed to display this alarm on the display screen as well
as to generate an alarm.
TOTAL TRAVEL AND FIELD SERVICE HOURS
Page 1

Lesley, John
From: Jamie Shytle [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, August.07, 2009.11:02 AM
To: John Lesley
Cc: Michael Peoples; Hube
Subject: Chemical feed system failure at Eagle Road WWTP-Cramerton
John
We received a tanker load of 50% sodium hydroxide on Wednesday, 8-5-09 at approximately 1400 hours.
The offloading went well and we restarted our caustic metering pump.
The chemical feed building and pumping systems were checked at-1630 on 8/5/09, again at 0820 on 8/6/09, and
at 1640 on 8/6/09.
Sometime between 1640 and 2100 that evening the 3 A " piping union below the caustic calibration tube failed.
It appears that the (PVC glue) socket weld came apart.
As a result nearly 4, 000 gallons of sodium hydroxide drained from the chemical building into our 5.0 mg
activated sludge basin.
The SCADA system failed to notify any personnel when the high pH values began alarming the system.
Our first indication of the chemical spill was upon arrival at 0800 on 8/7/09. By this time the aeration basin
average pH was <10.5 s.u.
We are constantly monitoring the facility effluent and will divert all discharge flows to a spare secondary
clarifier until the water can be neutralized with acetic acid.
I have contacted our chemical supplier (Brenntag, USA) for spill support.
At this time they are gathering all equipment and chemicals necessary to remediate the caustic spill areas and
assist with a chemical neutralizing plan.
I will keep you posted with progress.
If you have any questions please call my cell phone at 704-608-4235
Thanks
Jamie Shytle
Public Utilities Director
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
704-825-7499
j shytlegcramerton.org

CRAMERTON
Vr%
�,F
JAN 1 2 2009
1�-'O,�Caso DW&Surface Wafer Pro �� �E
€o4i1
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
155 North Main Street, Cramerton NC 28032
Public Water Supply Division Wastewater Collections and Treatment Division
January 8, 2009
Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDEHNR/DWQ
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
SUBJECT: Town of Cramerton
Eagle Rd., WWTP
NPDES: NC0006033
Tracking # NOV-2008-PC-0834
Dear Ms. Allocco .
We have completed the necessary equipment installation and electrical service connections to facilitate
flow proportional composite sampling of our facility influent wastestream.
I apologize for the delay and do not foresee any further issues that would cause our treatment works to
violate any conditions of our self monitoring protocols.
If you have any questions or need additional supporting information, please do not hesitate to call me at
704-825-7499 or email jshytle o,cramerton.org
Sincerely;
Jamie Shytle .
Town of Cramerton
Director, Public Utilities
copy: M. Peoples, Town Manager
file

.. . r . � ..
.:,

A L&
CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
December 17, 2009,
Mr. Michael Peoples
Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Notice of Violation
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6)
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton Eagle Road 'WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on December 15, 2009 by John Lesley of this Office. Please inform the facility's Operator -in -
Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report. Effluent samples were taken
for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Toxicity test information will be forwarded
under separate cover when available.
The inspection disclosed deficiencies summarized under the Record Keeping section of this report. It is
requested that a written response be submitted by no later than January 19, 2009 that details actions taken to
address the deficiencies. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Lesley of this office.
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50 o Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper
One
NorthCarolina
Natitrally.-

The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone]..
Sincerely, ,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Section
Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Bob Sledge, Point Source Compliance

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C.20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 I SI 31 NC0006033 Ill 121 09/12/15 117 18I CI 191 SI 201 I
Remarks
211IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -----------Reserved-----
67I 3.0 169 70I 3 I 711 DI 721 NJ 73 W 74 751 I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 09/12/15
05/06/01
Eagle Road WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
599 Eagle Rd
Cramerton NC 28032
04:00 PM 09/12/15
10/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)Ritles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Hubert Harold Hampton/ORC/704-825-7499/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Michael C Peoples,155 N Main St Cramerton NC 28032/Town Contacted
Manager/704-825-7499/7048259049 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
John E Lesley MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2198/
N.nature of Management Q A Revie "ff/ A ency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Da e
� >�`,
�=MarciaJAYTocco
L.� LL47z-:�k—�1--�a—la)WQ//704-663-1
�---�""-- 699
.Ext.2204/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3I NC0006033 I11 12I 09/12/15 117 18ICI
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The WWTP experienced an upset condition on August 6-17, 2009 resulting from a broken feed line on the
NaOH storage tank. The broken pipe allowed the contents of the 4,000 gallon tank to empty into the
aeration basin. A pH of >9.0 su at the effluent was caught by the SCADA alarm system; however, it was not
a "critical dial out" because it was considered after -the -fact. The point in the SCADA system for a critical
dial out is the influent flow structure of the plant. Because the spill was pumped to the aeration basin, the
influent was not impacted by the high pH. The alarm system is being upgraded to measure the volume loss
of the storage tanks and set off a critical dial out if the loss is out of the ordinary feed rate. The facility was
in violation of residual chlorine, BOD, and TSS for daily maximum, weekly average, and monthly average
limits (NOV-2009-LV-0509). The Division was notified immediately of the spill and upset condition by the
ORC and the damage to the system was mitigated in a timely manner. No other violations were reported in
the November 2008 through October 2009 period.
Page # 2

Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 12115/2009
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road 1MIVTP
Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ n ❑ 1-1
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ n 0—
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
V— AIn AAA AIR
(If the present permit expires in 6. months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■
n
n
n
Is the facility as described in the permit?
®
n
n
n
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Draft permit contains the same limit for a weekly average and monthly
average with a monthly monitoring frequency.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintairied as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
171
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
n
n
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
n
n
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
n
n
n
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
n
n
n
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
n
n
■
n
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
n
■
❑
n
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
n
n
n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
n
n
n
Page # 3

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WVVFP
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ■ n ❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ■ n n n
Comment: The ORC log has been signed by the back up ORC consistently for the
past 12 months. Monthly monitoring reports indicate that the ORC was on site and the
ORC has signed the reports; however, no visitation documentation is available. 15A
NCAC 08G .0204(2)(b) and 15A NCAC 8G .0204(5) require that the ORC must visit the
WWTP five days per week excluding holidays and must document visitation in a Daily
ORC Log to be maintained at the facility.
Laboratory res No NA N
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? ■ n ❑ n
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? ■ n n n
# Is the facility using a contract lab? ■ n n n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ n n n
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ■ ❑ n ❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The on -site lab (Certificate No. 174) conducts TSS, fecal coliform, pH, DO,
conductivity, temperature total residual chlorine, and total phosphorus testing. Water
Tech performs BOD, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, and phenol analyses. City of
Gastonia conducts color measurement. ETT performs toxicity testing.
0— c,..,.,,... Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
n
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
n
n
n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
n
n
n
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
n
'n
n
Is the unit in good condition.
■nnn
Comment: The bar screen also serves as grit removal.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in -center well of circular clarifier?
■
171
Are weirs level?
■
❑
n171
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
n
n
n
Page # 4

Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road VWVFP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately %4 of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
Comment:
Nutrient Removal
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
Type
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
Is nutrient removal process operating properly?
Comment: All process chemicals are stored in a building that is self contained. An
audio and visual alarm is present on the system. The SCADA has also been enhanced
to detect and notify the staff of any unusual tank volume loss from the chemical,storage
tanks. Any spills will be discharged to a sump and contained in the WVVfP. See
Summary page for more information.
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes No NA NE
■DDD ,
■nnn
■D❑D
■ D D D
■DDD
■DDD
.■DDD
Ext. Air
Surface
■DDD
■nDD
■DDD
■ D ❑ D
■DDD
■DDD
D D D ■
Yes No NA NE
Page # 5

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WVVrP
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
n
n
n
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
■
n
n
n
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
■
n
n
n
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
n
n
n
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
n
n
n
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■
n
n
n
Comment: See above comments regarding chemical storage.
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
.Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
n
n
n
■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
n
n
■
n
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
n
n
n
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
n
n
■
n
Comment: See comments above.regarding chemical storage.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
n
■
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
n
n
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
®
n
n
n
Is the flow meter operational?
®n
n
n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■
n
n
n
Comment: The flow meter was last calibrated by Ken Nash on 6/9/09.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑
n
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑
❑
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
❑
n
Is the tubing clean?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
In
n
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
n
n
n
Page # 6

r
Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009
Effluent Sampling
Comment:
Influent Sampling
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected above side streams?
Is proper volume collected?
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WVVfP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
■nnn
■ n n n
■nnn
■ n n n
■ n n n
nn■n
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ n n n
Comment:
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available? ■ n
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source? ■ n n ❑
Is the generator tested under load? ■ n Fl F
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site? \■ n n n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power? ■ fl fl fl
Is the generator fuel level monitored? ■ ❑ fl
Comment: Generators are tested under load weekly. National Power is contracted to
provide maintenance for the generator (VVVVTP staff performs routine preventative
maintenance). Fuel level is monitored electronically.
Page # 7

Town of Cramerton
Annual Wastewater Report for ZOOS
The North Carolina Clean Water Act of 1999 requires the Town of Cramerton to provide an annual report to its
customers and to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDNR) to
summarize the sewage treatment works and collection system's performance over the past calendar year. You
may review the Act at:
http://www ncaa state nc us/htmll999/bills/`ratified/house/hbill160.full.html.
The Town of Cramerton is pleased to present this 2008 wastewater report. Each year, the Town of Cramerton
completes over 4,855 measurements and chemical analyses to comply with permit requirements to treat your
wastewater and safely return it to our natural environment. The Town's staff of certified and State licensed
operators are committed to providing the Town's citizens and businesses with efficient, cost-effective
wastewater conveyance, treatment, and disposal. We endeavor to improve our collection and treatment
processes to protect you and the environment from the potential harm of poorly treated wastewater.
If you have any questions about our wastewater system or this report please contact Eagle Road Water
Reclamation Facility at 704-825-7499 or visit our website at www.cramerton.org
Name of Regulated Entity and Responsible Contact:
Director of Public Utilities
Operator in Responsible Charge:
Jamie Shytle
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
704-824-4337
Hubert Hampton
Operations Chief
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
704-825-7499
A N 2 8 2009 ;
F E B - 2 2009
Applicable Permits:
NPDES Permit: NC: NC0006033 r e'er p-d _.r_,p;
Collection System Permit: WQCS00058
Land Application Permit: WQ0002618
Cramerton's Collection and Treatment System and Process
Cramerton maintains over 26 miles of gravity sewer lines and force mains within the sanitary sewer collection
system. The wastewater treatment plant can treat up to four million gallons per day and is located at 659 Eagle
Mountain Road.
Wastewater from residential, commercial, and industrial sources flows by gravity through sanitary sewer lines
and pumping stations to the wastewater treatment plant where it is treated biologically using a modified
extended aeration process and chemical precipitation. The wastewater solids settle out in specially designed
circular tanks and are stored on site for final disposal on area pastures where the owners have volunteered to use
the biosolids to improve their soil. Harmful bacteria and other pathogens in wastewater are killed by
chlorination and then the chlorine, which can be harmful in the environment, is safely removed before discharge
into the South Fork Catawba River.

,�
�
?
e

i
r `
ollowing:
In 2007 the Wastewater treatment facility under went a major facility upgrade which included the f
1. Total electrical system upgraded from 575 volt to 480 volt.
2. New chemical feed equipment and storage facilities
3. Secondary settling tanks refurbishment along with new pumps and piping.
4. Chlorine contact chamber upgraded and fitted with diffused air systems.
5. New Bar screen and compactor for the removal of inorganic material.
6. Two standby generators capable of supplying complete electrical power to the waste water facility in
case of power outages.
7. Computer controlled alarm notification systems
8. New Administration building with offices, and laboratory.
Performance
We are proud to report the following:
Cramerton's Eagle Road facilities exceeded all requirements of the NPDES permit conditions and
environmental laws for 2008 by maintaining a near 100% treatment efficiency.
The sanitary sewer collection system had zero monitoring or reporting violations for 2008 which includes no
reportable bypasses or overflows of the sewer collection system.
Public Notification / How You Can Help Us Protect the Environment
If an overflow of the collection system does occur the Town is required to repair the problem causing the
overflow, mitigate any damage, and report the spill to the State, and in the case of larger spills, public notice is
required. The State can impose fines on the Town for large sewer overflows. Most overflows are caused by
grease or obstructions. The Town has ordinances to control fats, oils, and greases and you can help the Town
minimize overflows by keeping fats, oils, and grease out of your drains. You can also help minimize accidental
overflows by calling 911 if you see water running out of a manhole or broken pipe.
Certification
I certify, to the best of my knowledge, this report is accurate and complete, meeting the requirements of North
Carolina House Bill 1160, 1999 Clean Water Act, and the guidance provide by DWQ Compliance and
Enforcement Unit's in a letter of October 10, 1999.
Thomas I Shyde, Director Public Utilities Date
This report was posted on www cramerton. org and at Town Hall

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
November 23, 2009
Mr. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subj ect: Notice of Violation — Effluent Limitations
Tracking #: NOV-2009-LV-0509
Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
A review of the August 2009 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed violations
of the following parameters at Outfall 001:
Date
I Parameter
Reported Value
Permit Limit
8/11/09
Total residual chlorine
154 µg/L
28 µg/L (Daily maximum)
8/12/09
Total residual chlorine
1,100 µg/L
28 µg/L (Daily maximum)
8/13/09
Total residual chlorine
582 µg/L
28 µg/L (Daily maximum)
8/14/09
Total residual chlorine
460 µg/L
28 µg/L (Daily maximum)
8/17/09
Total residual chlorine
394 µg/L
28 µg/L (Daily maximum)
8/15/09
BOD
24.8 mg/L
15.0 mg/L (Weekly average)
8/15/09
TSS
260 mg/L
45.0 mg/L (Weekly average)
8/31/09
TSS
71.7 mg/L
30.0 mg/L (Monthly average)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The
Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If
the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and
you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special
Order by Consent. You may contact Ms. Marcia Allocco of this Office for additional information.
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 One
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NOTt11Car01111a
Internet: w�wv.ncwaterquality.org

Mr. Michael Peoples, Town of Cramerton
NOV-2009-LV-0509, Page 2
November 23, 2009
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Allocco or
me at [phone].
Sin rely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
MA

. Division of Water Resources
November 4, 2014
MEMORANDUM
To: Michael Parker
Water Quality Regional Operations, MRO
Through:' Cindy A. Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic T6xicologyBranch (ATB)
From: Carol Hollenkamp
Quality Assurance� cer, Aquatic Toxicology Branch,(ATB)
Subject Whole, effluent. toxicity test results
Gastonia/Eagle Road WWTP
I NP DES Permit 9 NCO006033/001
Gaston County
The aquatic toxicity test using flow -proportional 'composite samples of effluent discharged from the
Gastonia/Eagle Road WWTP has been completed Gastonia/Eagle Road, WWTP has apertmitted effluent:
l F ,
discharge that is 4.0 million gallons per day.(MGD) entering the Catawba River (7Q0 of 1:25 CS). Whole
effluent samples were collected on October 7 and Octob6r 9 by Wes.Bell for use in 4 chronic Ceri6daphnia
dtibia pass=fail toxicity test. This test passed for purposes of the toxicity inspection. Toxicity test
information follows.
Test, Type .3-Brood. CeriodaDhnia dubid chronic pass fail
'Test Concentrations 4.7%
Test Result PASS (ffirT6xicityliispection)
Control Survival, 100%
Control Mean 'Reproduction 12.0 -neonates
Test Treatnient Survival, 100%
Treatment Mean Reproduction
. 19.6.neonates
First SamplepH:
7.68 SU
First Sample_Conductivity
432 micronihoslcm
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
<0. 10 mg/L.
Second Sample pH,
7.67 SU
Second Sample Conductivity
438 micromhos/cm
Second Sample Total Residual. Chlorine
<OJO mg/L
Test results for. the abow samples indicate that the effluent would not bepredicted to have water quality
impacts onrece receiving water under conditions of maximum permitted discharge at'7Ql Q flow. The test run
by ATB'had a. control organism reproduction of 67%, which does,not meet the,80% 3d brood control
reproduction, as required by NC protocol for compliance testing,, and: also failed to meet the minimum
required average of 15: neoriates/surviving female. However, this testis not: used.,.for reporting
compliance; but-r-,at hertocornpletethereq s pf a toxicity inspection. Because the control test
criteria failures were accompanied by robust, consistent test organism reproduction that was significantly
greater than the control, reproduction, and the EPA requirement of 60% 3'd brood reproduction was met,
the test. is considered Valid for the toxicity inspection. Please contact us if youhave any questions or if
farther effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We maybe reached at [phone].
Basin-. CTB36
,cc: . Central Files; Wes Belt (MRO)
Aquatic Toxicology Branch :Water SIe nces Section
c

Bell, Wes
From: Hollenkamp, Carol
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 4:05 PM
To: Parker, Michael
Cc: Bell, Wes; Moore, Cindy.; Ventaloro, Christopher
Subject: Toxicity Test Report
Attachments: Gaston ia_EagleRd WWTP_1014.pdf
Attached is the toxicity test report for Gastonia/Eagle Road WWTP. .
If you have any questions, just let me know.
Thanks,
Carol Hollenkamp
Aquatic Toxicology Branch/Water Sciences Section
North Carolina Division of Water Resources/DENR
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Please NOTE NEW PHONE #
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Website: http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/atu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

I�� illMI
Postage $
Certiiled Fee K. 7 it 26
Return Receipt Fee 2.20 Postmark
(Endorsement Required) Here
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
95
s MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
s, 155 NORTH MAIN STREET """"""""'""'"'"ol '
c CRAMERTON NC 28032 _______________
swp/wb 12/11/08

'ertified Mail Provides:
A mailing receipt —
A unique identifier for your mailpiece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
ryportant Reminders:
Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mall® or Priority Mail
Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee, a Return Receipt.may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt N
required.
For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee of
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
VIPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
S Farm 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530.02-000.9047

UNITED STATES PQ�S .9ERV
'2
• Sender: Please print your name, address, a RIP + 4 in t f
C.f:k
Cz
NCDENR
SURFACE WATER PROTECTI
610 EAST CENTER AVE c)
SUITE 301
10 R E S Y TL L E N C- 2 8 3
�D
1-D , 71
CO

E' Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the'rev_ erse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAiMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
NC 280''2.
A. Signature
B. Received by (Printed Name)
❑ Agent
C. Date ofDeliveii
%
-In-0
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3 Service Type
CRAMERTON I Certified Mail ❑Express Mail
I� swp/wb 12/ I 1 /08 J ❑ egistered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchand'
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7007 1490 DI704 i 4'.509 6512 t, i i i; . 1
'S Form 3811. February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt io2sss=

11_u�(
Michael F. Easley, Governor 2
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 11; 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
7007 1490 0004 4509 6512
Mr. Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina. 28032
Subject: Notice of Violation
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton/Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, N.C.
Tracking #: NOV-2008-PC-0834
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on December 4, 2008 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please
advise the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the
enclosed report.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the facility's continued
failures to collect flow proportional influent composite samples which is a violation of the
subject NPDES Permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as detailed in the
Influent Sampling section of the attached report. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty
of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation, per day, may be
assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions,
or requirements'of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1.
SI
NCDENR
e
NCarolina
Noatma!!y
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
December 11, 2008
Page Two
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by January 1, 2009,
addressing the above -noted monitoring violation as detailed in the attached report. The Division
had previously cited the Town for this monitoring violation in the compliance evaluation
inspection report dated February 5, 2008. The Town's February 26, 2008 response (via
contracted engineering firm) indicated that the influent composite sampler would be collecting
flow proportional samples by March 10, 2008. The influent composite sampler has not collected
flow proportional samples to date. Please be advised that the Division may proceed with an
enforcement recommendation to the Director if the influent sampler is not collecting flow
proportional samples within 30 days of the receipt of this report. Your response shall include the
Town's actions to immediately address this violation. Please address your comments to the
attention of Mrs. Marcia Allocco.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mrs. Allocco or Mr. Bell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Samar Bou-Ghazale
Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Gaston County Health Department

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 I_j 3I NC0006033 111 12I 08/12/04 117 18I rl 191 S1 20ILi
J
Remarks
2111111111 11111111 1111 11111111 11111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ---------------- --------- Reserved ---- ----------------
67I 1.5 169 701 31 711 N I 721 NJ 73_Lj 74 751 I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Eagle Road WWTP
09:40 AM 08/12/04
05/06/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
599 Eagle Rd
Cramerton NC 28032
02:25 PM 08/12/04
10/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Hubert Harold Hampton//704-825-7499 /
Thomas J Shytle/ORC/704-825-7499/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Michael C Peoples,155 N Main St Cramerton NC 28032/Town Contacted
Manager/704-825-7499/7048259049 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature//(s)��of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wesley N Bell MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2192/ A 0
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
++
I
bi10 I
Marcia A!occMRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2204/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3I NC0006033 I�1 12I 08/12/04 I �� 18ICI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 12/04/2008
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? n n ■ n
Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ ■ n
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ ■
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ n ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ 171 ff-1 n
Comment: The permit description does not adequately describe the VWVfP due to the
completion of the approved upgrades (ATC dated 10/28/05). In addition, the facility
does not have a belt press and the plant is only equipped with one aerobic digester.
The two remaining sludge drying beds have been removed from the treatment process.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
n
n
171
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
n
n
n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
n
n
n
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
n
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis ■
Name of person performing analyses ■
Transported COCs ■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ■ n Cl n
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ C3 n ■
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow)' Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? n ❑ ■
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
n
n
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
n
n
n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
n
n
n
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
Cl
n
n
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
n
n
n
■
Page # 3

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WVNrP
Inspection Date: 12/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Comment: The records were organized and well maintained. The facility staff have
made commendable improvements to the overall documentation and record keeping
systems. DMRs were reviewed for the period November 07 through September 08. No
limit violations were reported. No influent value was reported on 3/14/08; however, the
inspection verified the discrepancy was a transcription error. Only twice per week
upstream/downstream sampling was performed during the week of 6/29/08 - 7/5/08.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
n
n
n
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
n
n
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
n
n
n
■
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
n
n
■
n
Comment: Influent and effluent analyses (including field parameters) are performed
under the on -site laboratory certification #174. Water Tech Labs (Certification #50), City
of Gastonia's Crowders Creek WWTP Laboratory (Certification #210), and ETT
Environmental, Inc. (Certification #22) have also been contracted to provide analytical
support. The laboratory instrumentation utilized for field analyses appeared to be
properly calibrated.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
n
■
n
Cl
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
n
Is the tubing clean?
■
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
n
n
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
n
■
Cl
n
Comment: Time -based composite samples were being collected. This violation was
noted in the previous compliance evaluation inspection performed on 1/31/08.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
00
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
Q
❑
Is the tubing clean? ■ n n n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ Q n
Page # 4

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 12104/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ n n n
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Samplin Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ n n Cl
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ n n n
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ n n n
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility appeared to be properly operated and well maintained. The
operation and maintenance records (including process control data) were organized and
well maintained. The operations staff utilize a SCADA system to aid in the operation of
the treatment facility.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual fl
b. Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
n
Cl
n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
n
n
n
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
n
n
n .
Is the unit in good condition?
■
n
n
n
Comment: The mechanical bar screen was temporarily out of service due to electrical
problems.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext.
Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
n
■
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
n
n
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
❑
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
■
❑
n
n
Page # 5

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 12/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Yes No NA NE
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
■ n n n
Comment: The facility continues to use a curtain in the aeration basin to direct the
flows in a "horseshoe" pattern.
Nutrient Removal
Yes No NA NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
■ n n n
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
■ n n 11
Type
Chemical
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
■ Cl n n
Is nutrient removal process operating properly?
■ n Q n
Comment: The faciity is required to comply with an annual effluent total nitrogen limit
(103.282 lbs./year) and a monthly average effluent total phosphorus limit (1.0 mg/1).
Aluminum chlorohydrate is added in the aeration basin effluent (prior to secondary
clarification) to reduce/remove phosphorus levels. The facility currently does not have
to remove total nitrogen due to the extremely low influent flows.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
n
n
n
Are weirs level?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
Q
❑
El
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
n
n
n
Is the drive unit operational?
■
n
n
n
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
n
n
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
Q
❑
El
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately''/< of the sidewall depth)
■
n
11
n
Comment: The facility was using one of two secondary clarifiers due to low influent
flows. The facility staff are in the process of diverting the stormwater runoff away from
the secondary clarifiers.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■
n
n
n
Are pumps operational?
■
n
n
n
Page # 6

J
Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 12/04/2008
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment: All four RAS pumps were operational.
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is containment adequate?
Is storage adequate?
Are backup pumps available?
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Comment: The facility uses liquid sodium bisulfite for dechlorination.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■ n n n .
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
nn■n
Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 12/04/2008
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment: All four RAS pumps were operational.
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is containment adequate?
Is storage adequate?
Are backup pumps available?
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Comment: The facility uses liquid sodium bisulfite for dechlorination.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■ n n n .
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
nn■n

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWT"P
Inspection Date: 12/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n
o
■
o
Comment: The flow meter is calibrated annually and was last calibrated on 6/17/08.
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
n
n
o
■
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
n
n
n
■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
n
n
■
n
Comment: The effluent appeared clear with no floatable solids or foam.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the mixing adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
n
n
n
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
n
n
n
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
n
n
n
Comment: The facility staff were in preparation to land apply sludge in accordance
with Permit No. WQ0002618. Synagro has been contracted to perform the land
application of sludge.
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
0
❑
n
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
n
n
n
Is the generator tested under load?
■
n
n
n
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
n
n
n
■
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
n
n
n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
■
n
n
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
■
. n
n
n
Comment: The facility is equipped with two standby power generators that are tested
on a weekly basis. The generators are tested under load twice per year (at a minimum).
Page # 8

1 CRAMERT®N
E3
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
155 North Main Street, Cramerton NC 28032
Public Water Supply Division Wastewater Collections and Treatment Division
Mrs. Marcia Allocco
NCDWQ
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
SUBJECT: NOV-2008-PC-0097
Town of Cramerton / Eagle Rd. WWTP
Dear Mrs. Allocco
Please find attached the letter of explanation from our contracted enginnering firm.
It should explain the reason(s) for the delay in flow proportional composite sampling on
our influent wastestream.
If you have any further questions, please call me at 704-825-7499.
Sincerely,
Jamie Shytle
Public Utilities Director
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main St.
Cramerton, NC 28032
Email — jsh3jlencramerton.org
Copy: Micheal Peoples, Town Manager

v
4041P
,epease
Architects -Engineers
February 26, 2008
Mr. Jamie Shytle
'Director of Public Works and Utilities
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
'Cramerton, NC 28032-1425
Reference: Town of Cramerton-Eagle Road WWTP Upgrade
Cramerton, North Carolina
SRF No. CS370730-20
NCDENR ATC Number 006033A01
Pease Associates' No. 2002040.00
Subject: NOV
Dear Jamie:
Pease Associates
2925 East Independence Blvd.
Post Office Box 18725
Charlotte, NC 28218
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
As requested, attached is Justification for Remission Request — Attachment A. Please attach this document to
your response to NCDNR.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Donald T. Garbr. , PE
President

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST - ATTACHMENT A
DWQ Case Number:
Assessed Party:
County:
Permit Number:
Amount Assessed:
NOV-2008-PC-0097
The Town of Cramerton
Gaston
NC0006033
$0
JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST FOR REMISSION OF CIVIL PENTALTIES
The Town of Cramerton formally requests remission of the above total civil penalties based on North
Carolina General Statute 14313-282.1 (c)(2), (3) and (4).
143B-282.1(c)(2) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation.
143B-282.1(c)(3) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident.
143-282.1 (c)(4) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations.
The Town of Cramerton entered into a contract with Hickory Construction to upgrade the existing
Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in order to enhance its operation and environmental
protection. The plant was designed with a flow proportional influent sampling system which consists
of a sampling pump located at the influent trough and a sampler located in the chemical storage. The
pump has been operating intermittently and as a result the contractor and supplier are currently
working on solutions. During this period an all weather sampler has been installed to operate during
the down periods of the permanent installation. The current all weather sampler is not flow
proportional but will be modified to accept the 4 to 20 ma signal. It is the intent to install the all
weather sampler as a permanent backup to the original sampling system. During this period the
WWTP has been sampling it's wastewater on a continuous basis and we have been working with the
contractor to resolve this issue.

Schedule of Events
The control device for existing all weather sampler has been ordered form Johnston Controls,
Inc.
Feb. 25, 2008 - Meeting with contractor onsite to resolve issues with existing influent sampling
pump. We can not determine completion of work by contractor until meeting is held.
March 7, 2008 — Control device is scheduled for delivery to the job site.
March 7, thru 10, 2008 — Install flow proportional device in all weather sampler.
March 10, 2008 — Issues regarding flow proportional sampling will be complete with back-up.
The influent sampling pump issue may be resolved after the Feb. 25, 2008 meeting if pump issues are
corrected by the pump manufacturer.
Because the WWTP has been sampling its wastewater on a continuous basis and will continue to
operate during this period, we hereby request the States assessed amount to remain as $0.

CRAMERTON
F E B, 2- 7 �,nn
NO DIQ RO,
o9ry cAa°�'��RV&SUrfaC-O'--W'dt8r-Pf0-, -.aon-
I
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
155 North Main Street, Cramerton NC 28032
Public Water Supply Division Wastewater Collections and Treatment Division
Mrs. Marcia Allocco
NCDWQ
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
SUBJECT: NOV-2008-PC-0097
Town of Cramerton / Eagle Rd. WWTP
Dear Mrs. Allocco
Please find attached the letter of explanation from our contracted enginnering firm. -
It should explain the reason(s) for the delay in flow proportional composite sampling on
our influent wastestream.
If you have any further questions, please call me at 704-825-7499.
Sincerely,
Jamie Shytle
Public Utilities Director
Town of Cramerton .
155 N. Main St.
Cramerton, NC 28032
Email — jshytle&cramerton.org
Copy: Micheal Peoples, Town Manager

.a-��-__" �V i S �

*44'e
ease
Architects —Engineers
February 26, 2008
Mr. Jamie Shytle
Director of Public Works and Utilities
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032-1425
Reference: Town of Cramerton-Eagle Road WWTP Upgrade
Cramerton, North Carolina
SRF No. CS370730-20
NCDENR ATC Number 006033A01
Pease Associates' No. 2002040.00
Subject: NOV
Dear Jamie:
Pease Associates
2925 East Independence Blvd.
Post Office Box 18725
Charlotte, NC 28218
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
As requested, attached is Justification for Remission Request — Attachment A. Please attach this document to
your response to NCDNR.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
�.JV`77�
Donald T. Garbr , PE
President

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST - ATTACHMENT A
DWQ Case Number.
Assessed Party:
County:
Permit Number.
Amount Assessed:
NOV-2008-PC-0097
The Town of Cramerton
Gaston
NC0006033
$0
JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST FOR REMISSION OF CIVIL PENTALTIES
The Town of Cramerton formally requests remission of the above total civil penalties based on North
Carolina General Statute 14313-282.1 (c)(2), (3) and (4).
143B-282.1(c)(2) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation.
14313-282.1(c)(3) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident.
143-282.1 (c)(4) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations.
The Town of Cramerton entered into a contract with Hickory Construction to upgrade the existing
Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in order to enhance its operation and environmental
protection. The plant was designed with a flow proportional influent sampling system which consists
of a sampling pump located at the influent trough and a sampler located in the chemical storage. The
pump has been operating intermittently and as a result the contractor and supplier are currently
working on solutions. During this period an all weather sampler has been installed to operate during
the down periods of the permanent installation. The current all weather sampler is not flow
proportional but will be modified to accept the 4 to 20 ma signal. It is the intent to install the all
weather sampler as a permanent backup to the original sampling system. During this period the
WWTP has been sampling it's wastewater on a continuous basis and we have been working with the
contractor to resolve this issue.

.
. v
.
^ . .
�,.~~`. .
`

Schedule of Events
The control device for existing all weather sampler has been ordered form Johnston Controls,
Inc.
Feb. 25, 2008 - Meeting with contractor onsite to resolve issues with existing influent sampling
pump. We can not determine completion of work by contractor until meeting is held.
March 7, 2008 - Control device is scheduled for delivery to the job site.
March 7, thru 10, 2008 - Install flow proportional device in all weather sampler.
March 10, 20087 Issues regarding flow proportional sampling will be complete with back-up.
The influent sampling pump issue may be resolved after the Feb. 25, 2008 meeting if pump issues are
corrected by the pump manufacturer.
Because the WWTP has been sampling its wastewater on a continuous basis and will continue to
operate during this period, we hereby request the States assessed amount to remain as $0. -

^t
r(Domes0c #ail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)
.>
D
L US E
Postage $
Certified Fee
9 Postman
7 Return Receipt Fee
3 (Endorsement Required)_ f HA M
c`7> \ %
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required) 3 ��
13
J MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
13 s TOWN OF CRAMERTON
� s 155 NORTH MAIN STREET ---------------
° CRAMERTON NC 28032
�_ swp/wb 2/6/08

.,ertified mail Provides:
I A mailing receipt
N A unique identifier for your mailpiece
I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
mportant Reminders: _
a Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail,
■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
s NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
I For an.additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof o1
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver foi
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt ie
required.
I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with thf
endorsement Restrictepl Delivery"
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti•
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
PORTANT. Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.'
Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

P Compl-+, items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete -
if Restricted Delivery isidesired
..i name and a6&�' on the rever
';. so that we can return the card to you.,
I Affach.this card to the back of the mai]piede,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
MR MIC14AEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CA4AMERTON NC 28032
swp/wb 2/6/08
by (
D. Is delivery address dif
If YES, enter delivery
E3 Agent
0 Addre
Name)/C. 67te 2.f Del
- —';
4 iterh 17 El Yes
below: [I No
Service Type
Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
I Ngistered 13 R e*tum Receipt for Merchandise
13 In red Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 13 Yes
1
71,�006i2i,?i60 0001fiW7 l-� 4.38 -., .-- i
).qFnrm.qA11 Pohninw9nnA n—osfin- Ppfiirn Aprpint

UNITED STATE9—P t&VICFE
Po4age & Fees F
I
T11.
• Sender: Please print your name, addressiand ZIP+4 in thisk
:NCDENR
0
rn
SURFACE WATER PROTEC@DI.O r-O
610 EAST CENTER AVE
M
=
SUITE 301 C)
;a bo090MM's
MOORESVILLE NC 28115 6
OD
1. Ili hIJ111 III I I
Ild
W, A

QY vv n I tgQG Michael F. Easley, Govern r /
William G. Ross Jr., Secre
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resou es
Coleen H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 5, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7006 2760 0001 8497 6438
Mr. Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Notice of Violation -
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton/Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, N.C.
Tracking #: NOV-2008-PC-0097
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on January 31, 2008 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please ;
advise the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the
enclosed report.
Although the facility's operations and maintenance are commendable, this report is being
issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the facility's failure to collect flow proportional
influent composite samples which is a violation of the subject NPDES Permit and North Carolina
General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as detailed in the Influent Sampling section of the attached
report. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) per violation, per day, may be assessed against any person who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by February 26, 2008,
addressing the above -noted monitoring violation and the deficiency cited in the Influent
Sampling sections of the attached report. In responding to the violations, please address your
comments to the attention of Mrs. Marcia Allocco.
NCDENR
Node Carolina
�turu!!y
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
February 5, 2008
Page Two
During this inspection, the ORC was given a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and
supporting documentation to apply for a permit to discharge stormwater at the WWTP site. The
Town's WWTP is required to secure a stormwater permit due to the design flow being at or
above 1.0 MGD and the presence of a stormwater outfall. Stormwater Permits are required
under the authority of G.S. 143-215.1 and the NOI with the supporting documentation and fee
should be submitted to the Division (address listed on the NOI) by March 5, 2008.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have questions concerning
this report or the stormwater application/permit, please do not hesitate to contact Mrs. Allocco,
Mr. Bell, or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Gaston County Health Department

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
Washington, D.C.20460
r EPA
C r!'1
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 2 15I 31 NC0006033 Ill 121 08/01/31 117 18I CI 191 c1 20I
Remarks
21111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA . -------- 7------------------ Reserved ----------------------
67I 1.5 169 70) 3 I 711 N I 72 I N I 73 LLJ 74 75I I I I I I I. 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Eagle Road WWTP
09:34 AM 08/01/31
05/06/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
599 Eagle Rd
Cramerton NC 28032
04:11 PM 08/01/31
10/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Hubert Harold Hampton//704-825-7499 /
Thomas J Shytle/ORC/704-825-7499/
Name, Address of Responsible Official Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Michael C Peoples,155 N Main St Cramerton NC 28032/Town
Manager/704-825-7499/7048259049 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules
Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory ;
Section D: Summary of Find in /Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wesley N Belly MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.231/
gement Q A Reviewer ency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers a
N0<1b
Sign ure Mocco
Marc a WQ//704-235-2204/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (cont.) 1
3I NC0006033 - I" 12I 08/01/31 I " ,BICI
Sectioh D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
RECORD KEEPING SECTION cont'd:
DMRs were reviewed for the period November 06 through October 07. Weekly average effluent BOD
violations were reported in November 06 (4-total), December 06 (5-total), and March 07 (1-total). Monthly
average effluent BOD violations were reported in November 06, December 06, and March 07. Weekly
average effluent TSS violations were'reported in November 06 (2-total) and March 07 (2-total). Monthly
average effluent TSS violations were reported in November 06 and March 07. Weekly average effluent
fecal coliform violations were reported in November 06 (4-total), December 06 (3-total), and January 07
(2-total). Monthly average effluent fecal coliform violations were reported from November 06 through
January 07. A monthly average effluent ammonia violation was reported in February 07. The facility failed
to achieve 85% removal efficiency for TSS in November 06 and December 06 and for BOD in December .
06. The Division has separately addressed all above -noted violations by the issuances of either NOVs,
NOV/civil penalty assessments, or SOC agreements.
The review of the facility's self -monitoring program revealed the following discrepancies:
- no flow was reported on 3/31/07*, 4/28/07*, and 4/29/07*.
- no effluent total phosphorus and total nitrogen were reported for the week of 3/19/07.
- the flow was not recorded on the DMR from 5/29/07 - 5/31/07 (should have been recorded as 0.00 MGD).
- effluent TRC values were reported outside of TRC meter's verfied range on numerous occassions.
- the upstream pH value reported on 6/27/07* (29.30 s.u.).was incorrectly transcribed.
- instream values were reported on 6/31/07 (transcription errors).
- only once per week (1/w) instream sampling was reported (3/w required)for the week of 8/26/07*.
- only 2/w sampling was reported (3/w required) for the week of 9/2/07.
- effluent TSS values were reported below the PQL for October 07.
- the effluent phenols value was not reported down to the appropriate PQL on several DMRs.
Note: * denotes amended DMRs will be resubmitted.
The ORC is currently involved with the Town's wastewater collection system and potable water
distribution system. The Town must ensure the ORC is allocated the sufficient time and staff needed for the
proper operation of the WWTP (including self -monitoring program compliance).
Page # 2

• Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 01/31/2008
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation_
Permit
Yes
No
NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
n
■ n
Is the facility as described in the permit?
n
■
n n
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
n
n
■ n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ n n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ n n n
Comment: The permit description does not adequately describe the WWTP due to the
completion of.the approved upgrades (ATC dated October 28, 2005). The facility
currently utilizes aqueous chlorination and dechlorination systems and chemical
additions for the removal/reduction of phosphorus. The facility does not have a sludge
belt press and the plant is equipped with only one. aerobic digester. Two sludge drying
beds have been demolished and -the remaining two drying beds have been removed
from the treatment process.
Compliance Schedules Yes No NA NE
Is there a compliance schedule for this facility? ■ ❑ n n
Is the facility compliant with the permit and conditions for the review period? ■ n n n
Comment:. The facility operated under EMC SOC WQ S05-010 (for effluent TRC and
total phosphorus) and EMC SOC WQ S05-010 Adl (for effluent TRC, total phosphorus,
BOD, and TSS). The SOC expired on 12/31/07. The facility has met the compliance
schedules set forth by the SOC.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally. clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ n n n
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ C1.0 0
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility appeared to be properly operated and well imaintained. The
facility staff incorporate a comprehensive process control program. The upgrades
included the installation of a SCADA system to aid in the operation of the treatment
facility.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
n
n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
n
■
n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
❑
0
❑
n
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times`and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Page # 3

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road VAWP
Inspection Date:. 01/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Results of analysis and calibration ■
Dates of analysis. ■
Name of person performing analyses ■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
❑ ■ n n
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
Illi n n n
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
n n ■ n
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■ 0 n n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■ n ❑ n
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■ n n n
Comment: Overall, the facility's record keeping system was organized and well
maintained. See "Summary" Section for additional comments.
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■ n
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■ 0 0 n
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■ n 00
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■ n n n
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑ n n ■
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
n n ■ n
Comment: ETT Environmental, Inc. (chronic toxicity), City of Gastonia's Crowders
Creek WWTP Laboratory (color), and Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. (BOD,
ammonia, TSS, TP, TN, fecal coliform, and phenols) have been contracted to provide
analytical support.. All field analyses (including conductivity) were and currently are
performed by the on -site laboratory (Certification #174). Following the completion of the
plant upgrades (including new laboratory facility), the on -site laboratory staff initiated
TSS and fecal coliform analyses in October 07.
Influent Sampling
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
fl ■
❑
fl
Is sample collected above side streams?
■ n
0
0
Is proper volume collected?
■ n
0
n
Page # 4

a
• Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WVVTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the tubing clean?
■
D
D
D
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at.1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
D
D
D
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
D
_E
D
D
Comment: The facility has been collecting time -based composite samples for
approximately six months.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
D
D
D
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
.D
D
D
Is proper volume collected? -
■
D
D
D
Is the tubing clean?
■
D
D
D
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
D
D
D
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
D
Cl
D
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)?
■
n
D
n
Comment:
Rnr Crrncnc
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
D
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■ D
D
D
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■ D
D
D
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■ D
D
D
Is the unit in good condition?
■ D
D
D
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■ D
D
D
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■ D
D
❑
Page # 5

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
'
Aeration Basins
Yes No NA NE
Are the diffusers operational?
n n ■
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■ n n n
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■ n n n
Is the DO level acceptable?
■ n n n
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
■ n n n
Comment: The facility staff have installed a curtain in the aeration basin to direct the
flows in a "horseshoe" pattern.
Nutrient Removal
Yes No NA NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
■ n n n
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
■ n n n
Type
Chemical
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
■ n ❑ n
Is nutrient removal process operating properly?
■ n n n
Comment: The facility is required to comply with an annual total nitrogen limit
(103,282 lbs./year) and a monthly average effluent total phosphorus limt (1.0 mg/1). The
facility currently does not have to remove total nitrogen due to the extremely low influent
flows. Aluminum chlorohydrate additions are utilized by the facility to remove/reduce
phosphorus levels. In addition, the facility staff utilize a Chem -Scan unit to
continuously monitor the phosphorus levels via SCADA system.
Cherylical Feed
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is containment adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is storage adequate?
■
n
n
n
Are backup pumps available?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
❑
n
Are weirs level?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
n
n
n
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
n
n
i
Page # 6

• Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE .
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■ ❑ Q
Is the drive unit operational?
❑ 0 ❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■ ❑ Q 0
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑ . .
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately %< of the sidewall depth)
■ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: The facility was currently using one of two final clarifiers due to low influent
flows. Both clarifiers were rehabbed as part of the facility upgrades. Both clarifier
troughs contained a significant layer of sediment due to stormwater runoff. Several
areas adjacent to the clarifiers were not graded properly to divert the stormwater runoff
from entering the clarifiers.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■
Q
Q
Q
Are pumps operational?
■
El
Q
Q
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
❑
❑
01
■
Comment: Two of the four RAS pumps were in the process of being repaired and
reinstalled.
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
Q
❑
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
■
n
n
■
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
■
Q
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
❑
Q
0
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
0
Q
0
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■
Q
0
0
Comment: The facility has installed a Chem -Scan unit that continuously monitors TRC.
levels throughout the chlorination and dechlorination processes. This monitoring
system is connected to the facility's SCADA system.
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ❑ o ■ o
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ❑ ❑ ■ Q
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? n ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Page # 7

Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 01/31/2008
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWrP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE _ ,
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
n
n
■
n
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
n
n
■
n
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: The facility utilizes aqueous sodium bisulfite for dechlorination.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
n
n
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
00
n
Is the flow meter operational?
■
n
n
n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n
n
■
n
Comment: The flow meter is calibrated annually and was last calibrated on 4/28/07 by
CITI, LLC.
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Cl
n
n
■
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
n
❑
n
■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
n
n
■
n
Comment: The effluent appeared clear with no floatable solids or foam.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the mixing adequate?
■
n
❑
n
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
n
n
n
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
n
n
n
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
n
n
n
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
n
n
Is the generator tested under load?
■
n
n
n
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
n
n
n
■
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
n
n
n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
■
n
n
n
Page # 8

r
Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 01/31/2008
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is the generator fuel level monitored? fl Q
Comment: The facility has two backup generators that are tested weekly and put
under a load on a monthly basis (at a minimum).
d
Page # 9

WA Michael F. Easley, Governor
�0 G William G..Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 25, 2008
M DAVID YOUNG
TOWN OF CRAMERTON' 4 rr,
155 N MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment1P%'- ' e
lvrt
Civil Penalty Assessment(s)
Eagle Road WWTP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number(s): LV-2006-0480, LV-2007-0226, LV-2007-0227,
LV-2007-0228, LV-2007-0229, LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $9,862.65 received from you
dated July 9, 2008. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment(s) levied against the
subject facilities, and these cases have been closed. Payment of these penalties in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398.
Sincerely,
!� i/� mcm,
Dina Sprinkle
cc: Central Files
DWQ Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location None b�tbCarolina
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St. tllCll��l�
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
Internet: www.newatergualitv.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

RECEIVED,
r
JUH 16 20V
State of North Carolina REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
=' Environmental Division
, 5 4! .
�� w�,. P. Department of Justice
ROY COOPER �` r �� P.O. Box 629
PO BOX 629 Raleigh, N.C. 27602
ATTORNEY GENL' �.f��?. -,;at� 919 716-6600
- E� ; = l a13igh, North Carolina ( >
27602 [phone]
June 13, 2008
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against The Town of Cramerton, LV 06-0480,
LV 07-0226, 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Dear Mayor Murphy:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decisions of the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision documents.
According to North Carolina General. Statutes § 143-215.5 and § 150B-45, the town may seek
judicial review of the Commission's decisions in the Superior Court by filing a petition within 30
days of receipt of a written copy of the final agency decisions. Otherwise, payment of the civil
penalty assessments and costs must be submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within 30 days of receipt of this final agency decision by mailing a check made payable to
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in an envelope addressed as follows:
Mr. Kevin Bowden
Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[Phone [phone], ext. 229]
If the town fails to pay the penalties within 30 days of receipt of the final decision
documents, the Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action
commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Kevin Bowden
Lois Thomas

A . I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF:
Assessment of Civil Penalties
Against
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
LV 2007-0229
FINAL DECISION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton in the amount of $1,831:50 ($1,750.00 plus $81.50 investigative costs). The Town
of Cramerton's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. the Town of Cramerton's request for oral presentation before the
Committee was denied by the Chairman because the -facts and contentions as to the remission
criteria were adequately presented in the materials before the Committee and argument would not
aid the decisional process; therefore, its request for remission was presented to the Committee on
Civil Penalty Remissions based on its written submissions and those of the Division of Water
Quality.
Having considered the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the -facts contained in the Director's
Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated by the Town of - -
Cramerton, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of Law, and that the Director

-2-
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1 in determining the amount of the
civil penalty. The Committee further finds that there are no' grounds shown for remission or
reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the following effluent discharge violations
that occurred in December 2006:
a. $750.00 for three (3) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6)-and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the permit
weekly geometric mean effluent.limit.for fecal coliform; and
b. $1,000.00 for one (1) violation of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the monthly
geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform.
Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee .finds that the assessment of civil
penalties and costs in the amount of $1,831.50 ($1,750.00 civil penalty plug $81.50 investigation
costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $1,831.50 against
the Town of Cramerton is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon the Town of Cramerton and
upon receipt hereof, the amount of $1,831.50 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.

r
-3-
This the idp(day of June, 2008._
r
David H. Moreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

-4-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
Mr. Robert Krebs COURIER MAIL
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue, suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the 13 day of June, 2008.
ROY COOPER'
-Attorney General
UA, L.J.
Francis W. Crawley,
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919/716-6600 -

CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0510 0000 5461 5105
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Michael F. Easley, Governor
s.__ William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
OCT 3 1 2007
NC DENR MRO
M-Surface- +Voter Protection
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case Number LV-2007-0229
Dear Mr. Peoples: 5
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) § 143-215.6A(f) and have found no grounds to modify the
civil penalty assessment in the amount of $1,831.50.
If you choose to pay the penalty, send payment to me at the letterhead address within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this letter. Please make your check payable to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR).
If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, in accordance with N.C.G.S. §
143-215.6A(f), your request for remission of the civil penalty (with supporting documents) and my
recommendation to deny the request (with supporting documentation) will be deli.vered to the North
Carolina Environmental Management Commission's. (EMC) Committee On. Civil Penalty Remissions
(Committee) for final agency decision. .
If you desire to make an oral presentation to the Committee on why your request for remission meets
one or more of the five statutory factors you were asked to address, you must complete and return the
attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Please mail the completed form to the
attention of Bob Sledge at the following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
On
e
NthCarolina
AIA(ra!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Cramerton
LV-2007-0229 Remission Result E
p.2
Your request for an oral presentation and the documents in this matter will be -reviewed by the EMC
Chairman and, if it is determined that there is a compelling reason to require an oral presentation from
you, you will be notified by certified mail of the date, time, and place that your oral presentation can be
made. Otherwise, the.final decision on your request for remission will be made by the Committee based
on the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact
Bob Sledge at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
W,,"ZColeen H. Sullins
attachment
cc: oesui _e_�egona �_"°, fi e
Enforcement file
Central Files

?' Postage
$ '
Certified Fee
®JUN
y
Return Recqueipt Fee
� (Endorsement Rered)
Restricted Delivery Fee
Required)
yy,., %�C�
Z
(Endorsement
L% .�J
�&
J
~
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
s TOWN OF CRAMERTON
s 155 NORTH MAIN STREET ---------------
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/ma 6/19/07

ertified Mail Provides:
A mailing receipt
A unique identifier for your mailpiece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
nportant Reminders:
Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail(
Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee,,a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPSO postmark on your Certified Mail receipt ie
required.
For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement 'Restricted -Delivery".
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt Is desired, please present the arti•
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
RPORTANT, Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
S Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

Michael F. Easley, Governor `LC
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary ��11 ►�,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 0001 8493 9891
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.l(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC000006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case No. LV-2007-0229
Dear Mr. Peoples:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1,831.50 ($1,750.00 civil penalty + $81.50 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data reported for December 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to
be in violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The
violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Robert B. Krebs, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Cramerton:
HCDENR
NocehCarolma
Aaiura!!y
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 . Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

$ 750.00 For 3 of the three (3) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,000.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,750.00
$ 81.50
$ 1,831.50
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of.

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NO
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please.prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessmentfactors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;_
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.

In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
K'
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during.normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of. 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings -
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider apples f� Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality. Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
(Date) Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water ,Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File,w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
rb/ma

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2007-0229
Outfall
Parameter
Reported Value
Permit Limit
001
Fecal coliform
6,647/100 mL *
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
001
Fecal coliform
10,570/100 mL *
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
001
Fecal coliform
17,1551100 mL *
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
001
Fecal coliform
1,710/100 mL *
200/100 mL (Monthly geometric mean)
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
PERMIT NO. NC0006033
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
. STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2007-0229
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,831.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of , 2007
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0229
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: 1,831.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
."Request For Remission. Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation o Facts "
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. §. 143B-282. 1 (c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penally assessment factors inN.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully gpplied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i. e., explain why the violation
was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for M previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the
activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additional pages as necessary)

0 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete.
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired.
I Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
I Attach this card to the back of the mallplece,
or on the front if space permits.
I. Article Addressed to:
L.
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TO-WN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET_
CR&4ERTON NC 28032
A.
13 Agent
Addressee
B. iv y (Printed Name) C. Dat ofpellveD
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 ? U WS
If YES, enter delivery address below: 13 No
3'NService Type
�0 Certified Mail 13 Express Mail
13 Registered 13 Return Receipt for Merchandise
[3 Insured Mail 13 C.O.D. ... )
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee); C3 Yes
6; 276QJ8-,
0001J&9n3
'it i
�102595-02-M-15*
1.11•.IirbaNkU41! 111 186mesio et, im hecelDt

UNITED STATES POST AI—S.EfZY.iC]E...,
E
6
• Sender: Please print your name, address;=ancl ZlOU'M this b oX'*'
NCDENR
SURFACE WA,-,T-tk PROTECTION
610 EAST CENTER AVE
SUITE 301
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
iff:1111111111111 , if

_ 0a0F WA
� r
M DAVID YOUNG
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 N MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 25, 2008
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
ply g
SAevar
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment �,1� �� ��s
Civil Penalty Assessment(s)
Eagle Road WWTP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number(s): LV-2006-0480, LV-2007-0226, LV-2007-0227,
LV-2007-0228, LV-2007-0229, LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $9,862.65 received from you
dated July 9, 2008. This payment satisfies in Ul the above civil assessment(s) levied against the
subject facilities, and these cases have been closed. Payment of these penalties in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398.
Sincerely,
Dina Sprinkle
cc: Central Files
DWQ Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
I�f1e Carolina
turullt,�
Internet: www.newaterauality.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedll0% Post Consumer Paper

u STATE 4
y'aH0
RECE-IVED
o o
+n n.
JUN G _IU0
State of North Carolina
NIC lr 1 /".1Ee a0 Department of .justice
ROY COOPER ��, I Ee�
TTORNEY GENE � �+� >r rti '_ k� �r � �'�c Nigh, North Carolina
27602
June 13, 2008
REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
Environmental Division
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
[phone]
[phone]
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against The Town of Cramerton, LV 06-0480,
LV 07-0226, 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Dear Mayor Murphy:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decisions of. the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision documents.
According to North Carolina General. Statutes § 143-215.5 and § 150B-45, the town may seek
judicial review of the Commission's decisions in the Superior Court by filing a petition within 30
days of receipt of a written copy of the final agency decisions. Otherwise, payment of the civil
penalty assessments and costs must be submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within 30 days of receipt of this final agency decision by mailing a check made payable to
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in an envelope addressed as follows:
Mr. Kevin Bowden
Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[Phone [phone], ext. 229]
If the town fails to pay the penalties within 30 days of receipt of the final decision
documents, the Department will seek to collect. the amount due through a civil action
commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Kevin Bowden
Lois Thomas

STATE OF F NORTH CAROLINA BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
COUNTY OF GASTON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
LV 2007-0230
IN THE MATTER OF:
Assessment of Civil Penalties ) FINAL DECISION
Against )
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON )
THIS MATTER came- before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry .
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton in the amount of $1,956.50 ($1,875.00.plus. $81.50 investigative costs). The Town
of Cramerton's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty .
Remissions for consideration. the Town of Cramerton's request for oral presentation -before the
Committee was denied by the Chairman because the facts and contentions as to the remission
criteria were adequately presented in the materials before the Committee and argument would not
aid the decisional process; therefore, its request for remission was presented to the Committee on
Civil Penalty Remissions based on its written submissions and -those of the Division of:Water
Quality
Having considered the record and the factors set -forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on
Civil
Penalty Remissions finds the facts
contained
in the Director's
Findings and Decision
. and
Assessment of Civil Penalties as
stipulated
by the Town of
Cramerton, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of Law, and that the .Director

-2-
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1 in determining the amount of the
civil- penalty. The Committee further finds that there are no grounds shown for remission or
reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the following effluent discharge violations
that occurred in January 2007:
a. $650.00 for two (2) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NCO006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the permit
weekly geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform; and
b. $1,250.00 for one (1) violation of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NCO006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the. State that exceeded the monthly
geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform.
Upon duly mademotion and vote, the Committee finds that the assessment -of civil
penalties and costs in the amount of $1,956.50 ($1,875.00 civil penalty plus $81.50 investigation
costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $1,956.50 against
the Town of Cramerton is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon the Town of Cramerton and
upon receipt hereof, the amount of $1,956.50 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.

Y
-3-
This the day of June, 2008.
David H. oreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

J% a
-4- .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the parties -listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton_. RETURN RECEIPT
-155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
Mr. Robert Krebs COURIER MAIL -
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610. East Center Avenue, suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the 13 day of June, 2008.
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919/716-6600

�0F W ATC9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 29, 2007 'w
k
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0510 0000 5461 5105
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED OCT 3 7 2001
Mr. Michael C. Peoples IBC DEAR MrRO
Town of Cramerton DW &Sur� co eater Proteck -
155 North Main Street - -
Cramerton, NC 28032 n
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County.
Case Number LV-2007-0230
Dear Mr. Peoples:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) § 143-215.6A(f) and have found no grounds to modify the
civil penalty assessment in the amount of $1,956.50.
If you choose to pay the penalty, send payment to me at the letterhead address within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this letter. Please make your check payable to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR).
If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, in accordance with N.C.G.S. §
143-215.6A(f), your request for remission of the civil penalty (with supporting documents) and my
recommendation to deny the request (with supporting documentation) will be delivered to the North
Carolina Environmental Management Commission's (EMC) Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions
(Committee) for final agency decision. -
If you desire to make an oral presentation to the Committee on why your request for remission meets
one or more of the five statutory factors you were asked to address, you must complete and return-, the
attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Please mail the completed form to the
attention of Bob Sledge at the following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
No thCarolina
JVatura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwatgMuality.org- Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Cramerton
LV-2007-0230 Remission Result
p•2
Your request for an oral presentation and the documents in this matter will be reviewed by the EMC
Chairman and, if it is determined that there is a compelling reason to require an oral presentation from
you, you will be notified by certified mail of the date, time, and place that your oral presentation can be
made. Otherwise, the final decision on your request for remission will be made by the Committee based
on the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact
Bob Sledge at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
6*- Coleen H. Sullins
attachment
cc: gores Milale-Reg ona,Ioff ce
Enforcement file
Central Files

Y Postage $
: I
Certified Fee !�N
7 Return Receipt Fee fff /
=1 (Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery Fee
zi (Endorsement Required) �! ✓ F
A `
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
S` TOWN OF CRAMERTON
si 155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032 ._____________-
swp/ma 6/19/07

;erlified Mail Provides:
A mailing receipt
A unique identifier for your mailpiece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
nportant Reminders:
i Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Maio
i Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
i NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee;. a Return Receipt maybe requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt ie
required.
For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Defivery°.
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti•
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
ViPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
S Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

.��0� WAT�9QG
Michael F. Easley, Governri 4
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
June 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 00018493 9907
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC000006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case No. LV-2007-0230
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1,956.50 ($1,875.00 civil penalty + $81.50 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data reported for January 2007. This review has shown the subject facility to be
in violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The
violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter. .
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143 -215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings -of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and. Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Robert B. Krebs, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Cramerton:
NCDENR
Nose Carolina
,Nq&,rally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality . Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

$ 625.00 For 2 of the two (2) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,250.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,875.00
$ 81.50
$ 1,956.50
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 1.43-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) ' The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
N'
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.

In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
3. File a petition for an.administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please. contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone]. -
Ll 01 (o 4
(Date)
ATTACHMENTS
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
rb/ma

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2007-0230
- Outfall
Parameter
Reported Value
Permit Limit
001
Fecal coliform
48,769/100 mL *
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
001
Fecal coliform
1,058/100 mL *
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
001
Fecal coliform
279/100 mL *
200/100 mL (Monthly geometric mean)
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

J
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
PERMIT NO. NC0006033
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN.
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2007-0230
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,956.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
1_:
2007

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0230
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: 1,956.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation o Facts "
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282. 1 (c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 14313-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i. e., explain why the violation
was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the
activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additional pages as necessary)

Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swD/ma 6/19/07
A-
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) I C.
D. is delivery address different from Item 1?r ❑ %e
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
n 7Qp.E, 21760 �10o 11B419J 99©711 1111 1 111 1 1 11
11, Feb tjary 2664 11 11 l or estic qetqm Receipt 102595 o2-M-05a

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
RE Ali ";:vr -1,77 "21 -1 7.2 *.j.'.JNL- 7111 v
F--Sender: Please print your nam%-,a` and
NCDENR
SURFACE WATER'0 aTIECTION
610 EAST CEWER AVER==
0
SUITE 301 0
MOORESVILLE NC 281 IV

- W A TF9p
Michael F. Easley, Governor
�QF
• ` �� G
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
�/J r
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
^- —I
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 25, 2008
M DAVID YOUNG
2.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 N MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
{KV
SUBJECT:
Payment Acknowledgment
`Lt[
Civil Penalty Assessment(s)
Eagle Road WW-1?
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number(s): LV-2006-0480, LV-2007-0226, LV-2007-0227,
LV-2007-0228, LV-2007-0229, LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $9,862.65 received from you
dated July 9, 2008. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment(s) levied against the
subject facilities, and these cases have been closed. Payment of these penalties in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398.
Sincerely,
Z�Elpp�wl 21
Dina Sprinkle
cc: Central Files
DWQ Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location N?AhCaroIina
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St lvawmlly
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
Internet: www.ncwateroualitv.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recyde&l0% Past Consumer Paper

sn sris( q. '
RECE-lVt: U1yPyd w� sr 'trp� -
an� �_
d p
9
-
1 JUN 1 G 2008
State of North Carolina REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
a Environmental Division -
NC DENR MR0 Department of Justice
ROY COOPER 629
PO BOX 629 RaleiP.Ogh,
Box
ATTORNEY GENL' e Reigh, N..C.C.
27602
1Q-51.��.�F 919 716-6600
va a
t ,�= al igh, North Carolina ( )
27602 [phone]
June 13, 2008
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against The Town of Cramerton, LV 06-0480,
LV 07-0226, 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Dear Mayor Murphy:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decisions of the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision documents.
According to North Carolina General. Statutes § 143-215.5 and § 150B-45, the town may seek
judicial review of the Commission's decisions in the Superior Court by filing a petition within 30
days of receipt of a written copy of the final agency decisions. Otherwise, payment of the civil
penalty assessments and costs must be submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within 30 days of receipt of this final agency decision by mailing a check made payable to
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in an envelope addressed as follows:
Mr. Kevin Bowden
Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[Phone [phone], ext. 229]
If the town fails to pay the penalties within 30 days of receipt of the final. decision
documents, the Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action
commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
Enclosure -
cc: Kevin Bowden
Lois Thomas

6 -. .
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF: )
Assessment of Civil Penalties )
Against )
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON )
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
LV 2007-0226
FINAL DECISION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143-215.6A and § 143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton in the amount of $1,831.50 ($1,750.00 plus $81.50 investigative costs). The Town
of Cramerton's request for remission was presented to the Committee on -Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. the Town of. Cramerton's request for oral presentation before the
Committee was denied by the Chairman because the facts and contentions as to the remission
criteria were adequately presented in the materials before the Committee and argument would not
aid the decisional process; therefore, its request for remission was presented to the Committee on
Civil Penalty Remissions based on its written submissions and those of the Division of Water
Quality.
Having considered the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts contained in the Director's
Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated by the Town of
Cramerton, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of Law, and that the Director

-2
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1 in determining the amount of the
civil penalty. The Committee further finds that there are no grounds shown for remission or
reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the following effluent discharge violations
that occurred in September 2006:
a. $750.00 for three (3) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the permit
weekly geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform; and
b. $1,000.00 for one (1) violation of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the monthly
geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform.
Upon duly made motion and vote, , the Committee finds that the assessment of civil
penalties and costs in the amount of $1,831.50 ($1,750.00 civil penalty plus $81.50 investigation
costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
L. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in, the amount of $P,831.50 against
the Town of Cramerton is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon the Town of Cramerton and
upon receipt hereof, the amount of $1,831.50 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.
0

-3-
This the day of June, 2008.
David H. oreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

-4-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy
The Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
Mr. Robert Krebs
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue, suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the �3+ day of June, 2008.
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT
COURIER MAIL
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
c-v,-A
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919/716-6600

WATER
QG
U6
r
A —I
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary 3 r •— --
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
VOctober 29, 2007 E
CERTIFIED MAII.7002 0510 0000 5461 5105
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
OCT 3 1 2007
DWO-Surface fter PrOfection
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case,Number LV-2007-0226
Dear Mr. Peoples:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for rcn issioli �in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) § 143-215.6A(f) and have found no grounds to modify`the
civil penalty assessment in the amount of $1,831.50.
If you choose to pay the penalty, send payment to me at the letterhead address within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this letter. Please make your check payable to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR).
If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, in accordance with N.C.G.S. §
143-215.6A(f), your request for remission of the civil penalty (with supporting documents) and my
recommendation to deny the request (with supporting documentation) will be delivered 'to the North
Carolina Environmental Management Commission's (EMC) Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions
(Committee) for final agency decision.
If you desire to make an oral presentation to the Committee on why your request for remission meets
one or more of the five statutory factors you were asked to address, you must complete and return the
attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Please mail the completed form to the
attention of Bob Sledge at the -following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NorthCarolina
'Vatura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center . Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Cramerton
LV-2007-0226 Remission Result
p.2
Your request for an oral presentation and the documents in this matter will be reviewed by the EMC
Chairman and, if it is determined that there is a compelling reason to require an oral presentation from
you, you will be notified by certified mail of the date, time, and place that your oral presentation can be
made. Otherwise, the final decision on your request for remission will be made by the Committee based
on the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact
Bob Sledge at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
rryColeen H. Sullins
attachment
cc. , ... ooresu�lle Regional Offic
Enforcement file
Central Files

L
:0 For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.corns
1.1
2- A L U-SE
11 Postage $ f��°JILL�
Certified Fee j \0
Return Receipt Fee i j Postmark
Return�U,rH Py
M (Endorsement Required) , e - 912M/ CID
Restricted Delivery Fee i �v
(Endorsement Required)
J3 dsps
v MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
-° TOWN OF CRAMERTON
------------
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
i CRAMERTON NC 28032 ---- --- =
swp/ma 6/19/07

'ertified Mail Provides:
A mailing receipt
A unique identifier for your mailpiece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
nportant Reminders:
Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mailc
Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Foi
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return
Receipt (PS.Form 3811) 'to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required.
For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee of
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement 'Restricted -Delivery.
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
NPORTANT. Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
S Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 00018494 2822
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil.
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC000006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case No. LV-2007-0226
Dear Mr. Peoples:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1,831.50 ($1,750.00 civil penalty+ $81.50 enforcement costs) against the.Town of
Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data reported for September 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to
be in violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The
violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton .
violated the terms, conditions; or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.l(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Robert B. Krebs, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Cramerton:
one NhCarolina
NCDENR VaNrally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: wa'Nv.ncwatcrgiialitv.ore 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

$ 750.00 For 3 of the three (3) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,000.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
11
$ 81.50
$ 1,831.50
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
1-9
L0
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether'a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Divisior of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.

In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality.
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
KO
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of. Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at-[phone].
0 19f 0,-t
(Date)
ATTACHMENTS
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
rb/ma

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2007-0226
Outfall
Parameter
Reported Value
001
Fecal coliform
1,756/100 mL
001
Fecal coliform
572/100 mL *
001
Fecal coliform
20,133/100 mL
001
Fecal coliform
582/100 mL *
* Denotes civil penalty. assessment
Permit Limit
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
200/100 mL (Monthly geometric mean)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
PERMIT NO. NC0006033
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2007-0226
Having been assessed civil penalties'totaling $1,831.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that. all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of .
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
2007

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0226
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: 1,831.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver ofRight to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation ofFacts "
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to NE.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or.a result of an accident (i. e., explain why the violation
was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the'violator had not been assessed civil penalties for M previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the
activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additional pages as necessary)

Complete items 1, 2; and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. x
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can returri'the card to you. B.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
'MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TO�VN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/ma 6/19/07
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
by ( Printed Name) I C.
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 'U Ye:
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3 Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7.01961, 2►760dlt 849�41''$22
'SlForrri 3811.(Fatiru(3fV 2004 l /it ! Domestic Retum ReceiDt 102595.02-M-154

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
WLM
• Sender: Please print your name3,@dr(
INCDENR
SURFACE WATERTRQTW�
610 EAST CENTER AVE= —
I SUITE 301
mQORESVILLE NC 28115—'
8;ancl ZIP-k4iJn-"tWi§ l5b)Z.'
i. Lk -3
cm
DN
RJA

WATF9P
cis r
M DAVID YOUNG
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 N MAIN STREET
CRAIERTON NC 28032
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 25, 2008
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment �� ¢- x' �W
P t�'
Civil Penalty Assessment(s) z nr
Eagle Road WWTP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number(s): LV-2006-0480, LV-2007-0226, LV-2007-0227,
LV-2007-0228, LV-2007-0229, LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $9,862.65 received from you
dated July 9, 2008. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment(s) levied against the
subject facilities, and these cases have been closed. Payment of these penalties in no Way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398.
Sincerely,
Dina Sprinkle
cc: Central Files
DWQ Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
O1e
NWthCarolina
&,rally
Internet: www.newaterguality.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledli 0% Post Consumer Paper

d„a STATE oN
RECkIVED
JUld 1 G
L•_ `V
. State of North Carolina
� �' R Itfkp � Department of Justice
ROY COOPER PO Box 629
ATTORNEY GENE? n n.n � i ' �i �r ''` r• +ar�.P,� ,RB
ti`c9'�-1)�$'-°a..r=. North Carolina
27602
June 13, 2008
REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
Environmental Division "
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
[phone]
[phone]
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against The Town of Cramerton, LV 06-0480,
LV 07-0226, 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Dear Mayor Murphy:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decisions of I the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision documents.
According -to North Carolina General. Statutes §143-215.5 and §150B-45, the town may seek
judicial review of the Commission's decisions in the Superior Court by filing a petition within 30
days of receipt of a written copy of the final agency decisions. Otherwise, payment of the civil
penalty assessments and costs must be submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within 30 days of receipt of this final agency decision by mailing a check made payable to
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in an envelope addressed as "follows:
Mr. Kevin Bowden
Compliance Oversight Unit
1617" Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[Phone [phone], ext. 229]
If the town fails to pay the penalties within 30 days of receipt of the final decision
documents, the Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action
commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Kevin Bowden
Lois Thomas

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF:
Assessment of Civil Penalties
Against
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
LV 2007-0227
FINAL DECISION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty- Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton in the amount of $1,581.50 ($1,500.00 plus $81.50 investigative costs). The Town
of Cramerton's request for remission was presented- to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. the Town of Cramerton's request for oral presentation before the
Committee was denied by the Chairman because the facts and contentions as to the remission
criteria were adequately presented in the materials before the Committee and.argument would not
aid the decisional process; therefore, its request for remission was presented to the Committee on
Civil Penalty Remissions based on its written submissions and those of the Division of Water
Quality.
Having considered the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts contained in the Director's
Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated by the Town of
Cramerton, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of Law, , and that the Director

f
-2- .
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1 in determining the amount of the
civil penalty. The Committee further finds that there are no grounds shown for remission or
reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the following effluent discharge violations
that occurred in October 2006:
a. $500.00 for two (2) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to. the waters of the State that exceeded the permit
weekly geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform; and
b. $1,000.00 for one (1) violation of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the monthly
geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform.
Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee finds that the assessment of civil
penalties and costs in the amount of $1,581.50 ($1,500.00 civil penalty plus $81.50 investigation
costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $1,581.50 against
the Town of Cramerton is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon the Town' of Cramerton and
upon receipt hereof, the amount of $1,581.50 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.

-3-
This the /20 day of June, 2008.
David H. oreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

-4-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the Parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
Mr. Robert Krebs COURIER MAIL
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue, suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the 13 day of June, 2008.
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919/716-6600

CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0510 0000 5461 5105
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
OCT 3 1 2007
NI -Surface Wcter Prctecti®n
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case Number LV-2007-0227
Dear Mr. Peoples:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) § 143-215.6A(f) and have found no grounds to modify the
civil penalty assessment in the amount of $1,581.50.
If you choose to pay the penalty, send payment to me at the letterhead address within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this letter. Please make your check payable to the Department of Environment and Natural ----
Resources (DENR).
If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, in accordance with N.C.G.S. §
143-215.6A(f), your request for remission of the civil penalty (with supporting documents) and my
recommendation to deny the request (with supporting documentation) will be delivered to the North
Carolina -Environmental Management Commission's (EMC) Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions
(Committee) for final agency decision.
If you desire to -make an oral presentation to the Committee on why your request for remission meets .
one or more of the five statutory factors you were asked to address, you must complete and return the
attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Please mail the completed form to the
attention of Bob Sledge at the following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Nod` Carolina
�tura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newaterqualitLg Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Cramerton
LV-2007-0227 Remission Result.
p•2
Your request for an oral presentation and the documents in this. matter will be reviewed by the EMC
Chairman and, if it is determined that there is a compelling reason to require an oral presentation from
you, you will be notified by certified mail of the date, time, and place that your oral presentation can be
made. Otherwise, the final decision on your request for remission will be made by the Committee based
on the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact
Bob Sledge at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
pyColeen H..Sullins
attachment
cc: gores ! s e gonalOffice
Enforcement.file
Central Files

Postage I $ 6
Certified Fee I ® JUM 19 2w
Return Recelpt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
San MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
sire 155 NORTH MAIN STREET
- -
cry CRAMERTON NC 28032-------------
or ,
s /ma 6/19/07

,edified Mail Provides:
i A mailing receipt
i A unique identifier for your mailpiece
i A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
aportant Reminders:
Certified Mail may..bNLYbe combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Maly
Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Foi
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Retum
Receipt (PS Form 3B11) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece:"Retum Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required.
For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee of
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt Is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
VIPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
S Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

lot__4
Michael F. Easley, Govemot)
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North -Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL 4 7006 2760 00018494 2839
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil.
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC000006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case No. LV-2007-0227
Dear Mr. Peoples:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1,581.50 ($1,500.00 civil penalty + $81.50 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data reported for October 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be
in violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The
violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Robert B. Krebs, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Cramerton:
ne
N" No,MCarolina
NCDENR Naturally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: w«,%v.nc%%-aterquality.orrn 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

$ 500.00 For 2 of the three (3) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,000.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,500.00
$ 81.50
$ 1,581.50
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of.

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division. of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed.. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the -Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation; ,
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support .of your request for remission.

In order to request remission, you must.complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right.to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
0"
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
. Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of -Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office -of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems and you anticipate remedial construction activities then
you may wish to consider apples for or a Special Order by Consent If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
(date) Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor -
Surface Water Protection
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
rb/ma

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2007-0227
Outfall
Parameter
Reported Value
001
Fecal coliform
968/100 mL
001
Fecal coliform
1,010/100 mL
001
Fecal coliform
459/100.mL
001
Fecal coliform
641/100 mL *
* Denotes civil penalty assessment
Permit Limit
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
200/100 mL (Monthly geometric mean)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
PERMIT NO. NC0006033
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2007-0227
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,581.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that.the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted. to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of
TELEPHONE
2007

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0227
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: 1,581.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission. Waiver ofRight to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation ofFacts"
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the .civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether -the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282. 1 (c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each -factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more ofthe civil penalty assessment factors in N C G S 143B-282 1(b) were
wrongfully pplied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e:, explain the steps that you took, to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i. e., explain why the violation
was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for).;
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil ep nal will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the
activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additional pages as necessary)

Complete items 1, 2, and.3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
. Article Addressed to:
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/ma 6/19/07
10
D. Is delivery address different from item 1
It YES, enter delivery address below:
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
❑ No
Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7006 12760 1 UB bil i841941i218391 11 111 111 1i HI If iii;
)S,Fnrm 8811 j February 91711714 1 i i a I rDbmAstibiRettinh Rebeibt IMEMM2.M.IFA

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
-1. r
Uij zaa w, -�j�
• Sender: Please print your name ad ress, and . lP,+4..jnT1Wi
UJ
y
INCDENR
Cj
SURFACE WATEVLTI�PTP-GTION
610 EAST CENTElt.AV-E,,,
c\j
SUITE 301
MOORESVILLE NC 2.8

. , OaO� W AT �9QG
r
M DAVID YOUNG
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 N MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 25, 2008
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment D°'vf a „ - T _ _ ' '� otame a
on
Civil Penalty Assessment(s)
Eagle Road WWTP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number(s): LV-2006-0480, LV-2007-0226, LV-2007-02275
LV-2007-0228, LV-2007-0229, LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $9,862.65 received from you
dated July 9, 2008. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment(s) levied against the
subject facilities, and these cases have been closed. Payment of these penalties in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398.
Sincerely,
2 WAIS WMWI NO
Dina Sprinkle
cc: Central Files
DWQ Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
One
N5ftthCarolina
Nawrallay
Internet: www.newateroualitv.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

,y SLNE ry
_lECEIVED
y'd Hu•c i... HOQl
JUN 1 6
L._ry
f'* , State of North Carolina
���1 �� Department of Justice
ROY COOPER S3 1
ATTORNEY GENL'�1�P[J�PO BOX 629
{ �Fie-@ ljlta Px. �.P �'1`,,.•`czi,•l;(a Pa 4
�( �n-� r i` : >aligh, North Carolina
27602
June 13, 2008
REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
Environmental Division
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
[phone]
[phone]
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against The Town of Cramerton, LV 06-0480,
LV 07-0226, 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Dear Mayor Murphy:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decisions of the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision documents.
According to North Carolina General. Statutes §143-215.5 and §150B-45, the town may seek
judicial review of the Commission's decisions in the Superior Court by filing a petition within 30
days of receipt of a written copy of the final agency decisions. Otherwise, payment of the civil
penalty assessments and costs must be submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within 30 days of receipt of this final agency decision by mailing a check made payable to
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in an envelope addressed as follows:
Mr. Kevin Bowden
Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[Phone [phone], ext. 229]
If the town fails to pay the penalties within 30 days of receipt of the final decision
documents, the Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action
commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
rancis VCrawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Kevin Bowden
Lois Thomas

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF: )
Assessment of Civil Penalties )
Against )
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON )
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
LV 2007-0228
FINAL DECISION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on -Civil Penalty -Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton in the -amount of $2,081.50 ($2,000.00 plus $81.50 investigative costs). The Town
of Cramerton's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. the Town of Cramerton's request for, oral presentation before the
Committee was denied by the Chairman because the facts and contentions as to the remission
criteria were adequately presented in the materials before the Committee and argument would not
aid the decisional process; therefore, its request- for remission was presented to the Committee on
Civil Penalty Remissions based on its written submissions and those of the Division of Water
Quality.
Having considered the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the -facts contained in the Director's
Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated by the Town of
Cramerton, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of Law, and that the Director

-2-
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1 in determining the amount of the
civil penalty. The Committee further finds that there are no grounds shown for remission or
reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the following effluent discharge violations
that occurred in November 2006: ,
a. $1,000.00 for four (4) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES
Permit No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the
permit weekly geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform; and
b. $1,000.00 for one (1) violation of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging. wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the monthly
geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform.
Upon duly made motion and vote,. the Committee finds that the assessment of civil
penalties and costs in the amount'of $2,08-1.50 ($2,000.00 civil penalty plus $81.50 investigation
costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $2,081.50 against
the Town of Cramerton is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon the .Town of Cramerton and
upon receipt hereof, the amount of $2,081.50 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.

-3-
This the AO -day- of June, 2008.
Davi H. Aofeau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

-4-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton-, N. C. 28032
Mr. Robert Krebs COURIER MAIL
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue, suite 3 01
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the !3 day of June, 2008.
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
P
W_ �v
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919/716-6600

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
AMU
October 29, 2007VLD
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0510 0000 54615105
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
OCT 3 1 2007
NC DENR MRO
M-Surface Water Protection
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case Number LV-2007-0228
Dear Mr. Peoples: Ij
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) § 143-215.6A(f) and have found no grounds'to modify the
civil penalty assessment in the amount of $2,081.50.
If you choose to pay the penalty, send payment to me at the letterhead address within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this letter. Please make your check payable to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR).
If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, in accordance with N.C.G.S. §
143-215.6A(f), your request for. remission of the civil penalty (with supporting documents) and my
recommendation to deny the request ,(with supporting documentation) will be delivered to the North
Carolina Environmental Management.Commission's (EMC) Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions
(Committee) for final agency decision.
If you desire to make an oral presentation, to the Committee on why your request for remission meets
one or more of the five statutory factors you were asked to address, you must complete and return the
attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Please mail the completed form to the
attention of Bob Sledge at the following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
On
e
NthCarolina
Naturall
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwateMuality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Cramerton
LV-2007-0228 Remission Result
p.2
Your request for an oral presentation and the documents in this matter will be reviewed -by the EMC
Chairman and, if it is determined that there is a compelling reason to require an oral presentation from
you, you will be notified by certified mail of the date, time, and place that your oral presentation can be
made. Otherwise, the final decision on your request for remission will be made by the Committee based
on the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you'have any questions about this letter, please contact
Bob Sledge at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
attachment
cc:. oaresvi?'lR'egional==Office
Enforcement file
Central Files

• r:Eyl For
/ • • • -
7
n visit our website at www.usps.como
U clefivery O-FF�C�AL USE
r ILL
y- Postage $ r ,q
Certified Fee
=1 ReturnReceipt Fee o /' I otts.� ar• 7
(Endorsement Required) ® JUf�t�+�►� '�
�i
:3 Restricted Delivery, Fee C
(Endorsement Requ red) r .�
� Tot
u Sent MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
J3 TOWN OF CRAMERTON
----- ------- -----
Stree 155 NORTH MAIN STREET
or P(
------------
cry,
CRAMERTON NC 28032
sw /ma 6/19/07

edified Mail Provides:
A mailing receipt
A unique identifier for your mailpiece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
7portant Reminders:
Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Maile
Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Foi
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery, To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return
Receipt'(PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required;
For :'an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee of
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted -Delivery.
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
APORTANT. Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry...
3 Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

AT �RPG
r_
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
June 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 00018494 2846
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC000006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case No. LV-2007-0228
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $2,081.50 ($2,000.00 civil penalty + $81.50 enforcement costs) against, the Town of
Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data reported for November 2006.. This review has shown the subject facility to
be in violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The
violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Robert B. Krebs, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town, of Cramerton:
NCDENR
On
e
r hCarolina
Amira!!y
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: N%,Nrw.nc%vatcraualitv.ors 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl.10% Post Consumer Paper .

$ 1,000.00 For 4 of the four (4) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 1,000.00 For 1 of the one (1).violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ 2,000.00
$ 81.50
$ 2,081.50
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention o£

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
KO
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied.by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in' dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.'
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division `of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough.
statement in support of your request for remission.

In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
Also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source_ Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If.you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the'Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received iri the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-671.4
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems and you anticipate remedial construction activities then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent If you have any questions
about this civil penafty assessment or a Special Order by Consent please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
(Date)
ATTACHMENTS
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
rb/ma

Outfall Parameter
001
Fecal coliform
001
Fecal coliform
001
Fecal coliform
001
Fecal coliform
001
Fecal coliform
ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2007-0228
Reported Value
21,921/100 mL
2,462/100 mL
667/100 mL'*
27,715.7/100 mL
992/100 mL *
-X Denotes civil penalty assessment,
Permit Limit
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
400/100 mL (Weekly geometric mean)
200/100 mL (Monthly geometric mean)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
FILE NO. LV-2007-0228
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $2,081.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission .of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
. Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of
ADDRESS ;
TELEPHONE
2007

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0228
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: 2,081.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission. Waiver ofRight to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation offacts"
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282. 1 (c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penally assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) ' the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the violation
was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the
activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additional pages as necessary)

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3..AIso complete.
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name.and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
-MR MICHAEL PEOPLES; TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/ma 6/19/07
A.
Agent
B. Re6eived by (Printed Name) I C. Date of
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? '❑ Ye:
It YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Service Type
0 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
7QQ6 27Eq Plfl ,�4141 2846i itl Iti iitii
'$,Fora) 381 L Fporumy, 2Q04.1 I 1 1 Qomgqlc Returg Receipt
❑ Yes
it 1
102595-02-M-154

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
0 Sender: Please print your name; add
U Cj
;NCDENR.
Cu
SURFACE WATEff-P 90TECT§07R
1610 EAST CENTER AVE
CQ
SUITE 301
'MOORESVILLE NC 28115
—tLs
.R�

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 25, 2008
M DAVID YOUNG
TOWN OF CRAA1ERTON
155 N MAIN STREET -'
CRAMERTON NC 28032
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
P-7-7-A V77m�-.f
-�u
D
1A 0)
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment
VIM
tection
Civil Penalty Assessment(s)
Eagle Road WVITP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number(s): LV-2006-0480, LV-2007-0226,. LV-2007-0227,
LV-2007-0228, LV-2007-0229, LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $9,862.65 received from you
dated July 9, 2008. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment(s) levied against the
subject facilities, and these cases have been closed. Payment of these penalties in no Way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits. . -
If you have any questions, please call Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398.
Sincerely,
9 � W ME ME I
Dina Sprinkle
cc: Central Files
DWQ-Moof&9viI1e—Re-gJ&Ka-1 Office Supervisor
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
One
NNPMCarolina
IvatArrally
Internet: www.newater(lualitv.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recyded/l 0% Post Consumer Paper

4lyd� STA7Ep.Ho�y
State of North Carolina.
Department Of Justice REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
ROY COOPER PO BOX 629 Environmental Division
ATTORNEY GENERAL [e-mail] ncdoj.gov -
Raleigh, North Carolina Telephone: [phone]
27602 Fax: [phone]
July 10, 2008
-EIVE""
Rffi�C U
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy
The Town of Cramerton J U L 14 2008
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 29032 NC DENR MRO -
RE: Request For Remission by the Town of Cramerton. M-Surface Water Protection
Dear Mayor Murphy:
Enclosed is the Order correcting the fmal-agency decision regarding the civil penalty
assessed against the Town of Cramerton at the May. 2008 meeting of the Committee on Civil
Penalty Remissions. This Order revises the final decision to reflect the action of the Committee
to assess a civil penalty of $500.00 and not the $2,000.00 that was stated in the original written
decision. I am also providing a copy to Mr. William Brown who brought the error to the staff s
and my attention.
Very truly yours,
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General -
Coin ssion Counsel
Enclosure
cc: William Brown
K&O L<

-. LA
.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF:
Assessment of Civil Penalties
Against
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
LV 2006-0480
ORDER CORRECTING
FINAL DECISION
THIS MATTER was considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton. The written final decision prepared in this matter contained typographical errors
which incorrectly stated the amount of the civil penalty recommended by the Director and
assessed by the Committee as $2,000.00 and not the correct $500.00 amount set forth in the
record and assessed by the Committee's final action.
Therefore it is ORDERED that the final agency decision is revised to show the correct
amount of the civil penalty assessed of $580.15 ($500.00 plus $80.15 investigative costs) for the
effluent discharge violations that occurred in August 2006. The Town of Cramerton is to pay the
corrected assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $580.15 to the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.
This the / day of July, 2008.
David . oreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing ORDER
CORRECTING FINAL DECISION on the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C.- 28032
William L. Brown, Esq. US MAIL
P. O. Box 399
Cornelius, N. C. 28031
Mr. Robert Krebs COURIER MAIL
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue, suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the %y day of July; 2008.
ROY COOPER
North Carolina Attorney General
uo- 0-
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919/716-6600

dia SLATE wH
„n �yi
RECEIVED.
0 o
i
1
JUid -Ins
State of North Carolina
i1C DEN!R J: 40 Department of Justice
ROY COOPER PO BOX 629
ATTORNEY GENL'l(—�� A�.� r.i ; �;gr�•`s ' �r� �C'r ,cP`
"U{tt North Carolina
�i
27602
June 13, 2008
REPLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
Environmental Division
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
[phone]
[phone]
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy CERTIFIED MAIL
The Town of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against The Town of Cramerton, LV 06-0480,
LV 07-0226; 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Dear Mayor Murphy:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decisions of the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision documents.
According to North Carolina General. Statutes § 143-215.5 and § 150B-45, the town may seek
judicial review of the Commission's decisions in the Superior Court by filing a petition within 30
days of receipt of a written copy of the final agency decisions. Otherwise, payment of the civil
penalty assessments and costs must be submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within 30 days of receipt of this final agency decision by mailing a check made payable to
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in an envelope addressed as follows:
Mr: Kevin Bowden
Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[Phone [phone], ext. 229]
If the town fails to pay the penalties within 30 days, of receipt of the final decision
documents, the Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action
commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Kevin Bowden
Lois Thomas

J - A.
STATE OF NORTH CA_ ROLINA BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
COUNTY OF GASTON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION -
LV 2006-0480
IN, THE MATTER OF: ) .
Assessment of Civil Penalties ) FINAL DECISION
Against )
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON )
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on May 8, 2008, upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for entry
of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against the Town
of Cramerton in the amount of $2,080.15 ($2,000.00 plus $80.15 investigative costs). The Town
of Cramerton's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. the Town of Cramerton's request for oral presentation before the
Committee was denied by the Chairman- because the facts and contentions as to the remission
criteria were adequately presented in the materials before the Committee and argument would riot
aid the decisional process; therefore, its request for remission was presented to the Committee on
Civil Penalty Remissions based on its written submissions and those of the Division of Water
Quality.
Having considered the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts contained in the Director's
Findings and Decision and . Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated by the Town of
_ Cramerton, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions, of Law, and that the Director

.0 .
-2-
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1 in determining the amount of the .
civil penalty. The Committee further finds that there are no grounds shown for remission or.-.,
reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the following effluent discharge violations
that occurred in August 2006:
a. $500.00 for two (2) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of 'the State that exceeded the permit
weekly geometric mean effluent limit for fecal coliform;
b. $500.00 for two (2) violations of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit
No. NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the weekly
average effluent limit for BOD; and
C. $1,000.00 for one violation of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No.
NC0006033 by discharging wastewater to the waters of the State that exceeded the monthly _
average. effluent limit for BOD.
Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee finds that the assessment of civil
penalties and costs in the amount of $2,080.15 ($2,000.00 civil penalty plus $80.15 investigation
costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $2,080.15 against
the Town of Cramerton is AFFIRMED. -
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon the Town of Cramerton and
upon receipt hereof, the amount of $2,080.15 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days as required by law.

-3-
This the _p day of June, 2008.
David I Nforeau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission

-
4-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoingFINAL DECISION on
the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mayor Ronald G. Murphy— - - CERTIFIED MAIL.
The Town --of Cramerton RETURN RECEIPT
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, N. C. 28032
Mr. Robert Krebs COURIER MAIL
DWQ Regional Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue, suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
This the , 3 day of June, 2008. -
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
•
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-9001
919n l 6-6600

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 29, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0510 0000 5461 5105
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton; NC 28032
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
an Wate uality
OCT 3 1 2007
NC DENR MR®
DW -Surface Water Protection
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
'NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
Gaston County
Case Number LV-2006-0480
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have decided to modify the initial civil penalty assessment of $2,081.50 to the
total amount of $581.50.
If you choose to pay the modified penalty, send payment to me at the letterhead address within thirty
(30) days of receipt of this letter. Please make your check payable to the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR).
If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, in.accordance with N.C.G.S. §
143-215.6A(f), your request for remission of the civil penalty (with supporting documents) and my
recommendation (with supporting documentation) will be delivered to the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission's (EMC) Committee On Civil Penalty, Remissions
(Committee) for final agency decision.
If you desire to make an oral presentation to the Committee on why your request for remission meets
one or more of the five statutory factors you were asked to address, you must complete and return the
attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Please mail the completed form to the
attention of Bob Sledge at the following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
N"ofthCarolina
�Natura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterqualiry.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Cramerton
LV-2006-0480 Remission Result
p. 2
Your request for an oral presentation and the documents in this matter will be reviewed by the EMC
Chairman and, if it is determined that there is a compelling reason to require an oral presentation from
you, you will be notified by certified mail of the date, time, and place that your oral presentation can be
made. Otherwise, the final decision on your request for remission will be made by the Committee based
on the written record.
Thank you for,yourcooperation in this matter. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact
Bob Sledge at M9) 733-5083, extension 547.
Sincerely,
a oleen H. Sullins
attachment
cc: MooresMr a RegiAah a�.f�fi`c
Enforcement file
Central Files

ofwA7-
�O� pG
G7 r i
y
O � !
Mr. Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 17, 2007
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Cramerton WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Case Number LV-2006-0480
Gaston County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
( lbl i' alveir3L OFFICE
r
JAN 1 8 2007
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalty levied against the subject
facility. Your request will be scheduled for review by the Director and you will be notified of the result.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
Bob Sledge, Environmental Specialist
Point Source Branch
cc: oaresvl ei , /lattaclllnents
Enforcement File w/originals
Central Files w/attachments
N,�,o �thCarolina
�/ aft,417141
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
PERMIT NO. NC0006033
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINSTRATIVE H EARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS .
FILE NO. LV-2006-0480
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $2,080.15 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated December 14, 2006, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the director of the Division of Water
Quality within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the eleventh day of January , 2006
' c C-
BY
ADDRESS
Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton. .
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
TELEPHONE
704/824-4337

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2006-0480
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $2,080.15
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission. Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of
Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating.
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may .relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N C G S 143B-282 1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ ' (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
The Town of Cramerton formally requests remission of the total civil penalty assessed* and
believes that three of the five factors above (b, c, and d) apply to the current situation at the
treatment plant. The treatment plant is currently under construction using State loan funds to
*The penalty assessed results from August 2006 data reported to the State. Reports from September through November 2006 also indicate
excursions and the Town is requesting forbearance of assessing penalties for those months also. The Town is separately requesting an
amendment of its existing SOC during remaining construction time to address these parameters and remedial steps

improve and enhance the existing facility and the protection of the environment and the methods
of construction required to maintain continued operation of the plant, in conjunction with an
unexpected reduction in industrial flow, resulted in the violations (item c above). Once the ORC
noticed the violations, he promptly brought the violations 'to the attention of the Contractor and
the Contractor, Town, and Project Engineer began to immediately assess the causes and develop
a plan to abate the excursions (item b above.) The excursions were contrary to the Town's
record of continued operation below limits and lack of previous penalties (item d above).
Detailed explanation of the three factors follows.
Item C: The violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident
In November 2005, the Town of Cramerton entered into a contract with Hickory Construction
and Recore Electric to upgrade the existing Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in order to
enhance its operation and _ environmental protection. The plant during construction has been
operating under an SOC that modified limits only on total phosphorus and total residual chlorine.
In late August 2006, the ORC Mr. Jamie Shytle noticed a sharp increase in BOD and Fecal
Coliform readings which exceeded the limits set forth in the Permit. After reviewing the
situation with the Contractor and Project Engineer, Mr. Shytle determined that the excursions
coincided with the shut down of one of the two clarifiers on site (August 4, 2006) as shown in
Figures 1, 2, and 3. The shut down was required in order to perform replacement and upgrading
of the clarifier equipment. The installation of a floating baffle wall had also taken place in the
aeration basin shortly prior to the excursions, which caused increased detention time and
saturation of oxygen.
During the same time period, the effluent flow rates were starting to become sporadic due to the
unexpected phased shut down of the major industry feeding flow to the treatment plant. This
reduced and sporadic flow also caused a biological change in the 'aeration basin. The detention
time and saturation of oxygen caused a light mass to pass through the basin into the final clarifier
and carry over the weir into the chorine contact tank. Figure 4 shows the Effluent Flow Rates for
January 2006 through November 2006 reflecting this flow trend and its impacts.
The combination of the upgrading of the plant and the phased shut down of the major industry
was unavoidable by the Town and was something that could not have been prevented or for
which it could be prepared. An SOC Amendment has been submitted for approval to modify
limits on these additional parameters for the remaining duration of construction and is attached
for your information.
Item B: The Town Promptly abated damaze resulting from the violation
Upon learning of the excursions, the ORC immediately met with the Contractor and the Project
Engineer to develop a plan to mitigate further excursions. The contractor closely monitored his
construction activities to determine if there were any activities that could be altered to lessen the
impact attributed to the construction operations. The contractor also minimized the amount of
shutdowns to the one operable clarifier. The ORC increased the amount of chlorine added to the
effluent. The efforts made resulted in the BOD and Fecal Coliform counts returning to

acceptable levels as shown in Figures 1 and 3. Test results have shown that the additional
chlorine added to the effluent has had no adverse impact on toxicity.
The contractor's construction schedule called for the switch from the existing clarifier to the
newly upgraded clarifier with Clarifier #2 completely shut down on October 5, 2006. This
switch over once again caused BOD and Fecal Coliform counts to exceed limits. This time the
BOD was quickly brought back to normal levels and the Fecal Coliform counts were
approaching acceptable levels when the plant was impacted again by reduced ' flows. The
industry began a more sporadic release of influent into the plant in November and announced an
anticipated total shutdown by the end of the year. This caused a drastic increase. in BOD levels,
TSS levels, and continued rise of Fecal Coliform counts.
Continued efforts were made to reduce BOD, TSS, and Fecal Coliform, however the contractors
continued construction operations added further complications. In order to remediate and
upgrade the existing chlorine contact tank, the contractor has had to bypass into a temporary
tank. This initially caused a limitation to the amount of chlorine that could be injected into the
effluent and caused high fecal counts. Additional chlorine tablets were placed in the effluent
piping to help with the Fecal Coliform limits, however the tablets were placed downstream of the
sampling point therefore the samples did not indicate the benefit of the tablets. The plant
operators have relocated a booster pump to aid in the delivery of chlorine. This modified system
will allow approximately 100 pounds of chlorine to be delivered at the discharge point. The
plant operators have also dropped chlorine tablets in the temporary chlorine. contact tank to help
deliver additional chlorine to the effluent. The Town has also now started dripping 12%
hypochlorite and 25% NaOH into the effluent and is receiving higher residual values. The Town
believes that the fecal coliform counts are now under control with no adverse impact to toxicity.
In order to better prepare for the current fluctuations in industrial flow, the Town has met with
the industry and has requested a schedule of release dates as well as a final date of complete
shutdown (now estimated March 2007). This should allow the Town to properly adjust chemical
additives to maintain all levels within limits if adhered to. The upgraded chlorine contact tank
should be back in service by the end of January and the construction project should be complete
by March 9, 2007.
Item D: The Town has not been assessed civil penalties for any Previous violations
Prior to the construction and flow caused excursions in August 2006, the Eagle Road Wastewater
Treatment Plant had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations during its
ownership and operation of this facility.

Y
N
N
o
M N
U O
w �
fA E
.O.
m Z
cc0 O
t .r
UCD
❑ C
ON
m
� (0
� C
� CO
LM
LL
N
r
C0000000
r-O
a--a-O
C
O
R
at
G
E
-se
:L
00000O00N0NLO0
E
LOLOLOinLOLOLOinLOinuOLO
ty
CD
E
J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
O
C
0000CCCMf`COCMcn0NK
Q
rZ4m
m
d
N
m
r��
N
r-:OR
00
p�L
pN��
O
<OMN
co
cMww
N
00�'ttcoN�NCONOM
00
M
Lq
O
00
7
Cn
00
CO
r
W
MOOD
•-
OON
OC
Y
d
d
(O
n(n�Cpcc00)
00
00
00
00
w
00
CM
00M
CV)
N
O
L6
Gi
N
00
O
00
�AOr-p00ef
00
w
CO
I�
toLo
"104
CO
NOMW
_
NCMNCA`-�
CV')M
M
N
O
et
00
O
oOp
b
�
d
ce)
cn
�
ti
a
t
C
0
lCtl
d
LL�Q���Qv�0z
R
LO
7
7
7
C9
v
O
d
sU
aO
"O
t,
a0.
�.1
oy
21
0,
19,
0
ell
0
90
Z'9 3
O - u
o0 ua�el
# JGU
Je10
t fJO
aS
Sa,
�b
F6
Is,
goo 900
'4 B
V - u
o0 u
qel
# Jel1
Jelo
I
b
A%
n
el
n
900
'9Z a
unr -
speis
uol;o
njisu
O ue
auji
9
s�o
�G
�n
,
O„
�T
el
ob
b
Sya
e,
y
2�
a
y
S;G
�On
�G
Nn
4
`On
O
Ln
O
LO
O
0
O
w
O
to
O
w
Itr-

N
W
A
Cn
CA
-I
00
✓
a�S
�a?
6�
2idrS
9,0�?
'll�y2
�ay
`sr
✓G
�7
GAS
4aff
a Wall
onstr
cti
n
tart
q
'tI,
9G9S
s@
s@
0
Oof�
0
tio
o�
O@c�
O@eS
s -
une 2
, 2006
Cl
rifier
T
keir
Down
-Aug
2006
CI
rifier #
T
e
Down
Oct 5,
2006
vzpt»D<<3D3-n�
3
e�Di<»�cc�°1�0a�
0
V
W
V��
O�
tov
V
N
�
AN
V
f.I7
Woo
C 71
N
W
CD
A
G1
O
(O
O
V
IV
toCn.P(TO
VOANON�
W
IV
v
O�
W�
00--'00
fV
N
W
W
W
OA

o
o 0
o CD
0 0
✓d �
o
0
0-
o 0
✓
6,A
Zld^'
21d�s
_
q�r2
Zldy�
2ldy
✓
GG� ,
GAS. •
ffle Wail C
nstru
tion
Starts - June
26, 2006
9�
dai
ifier #
Taken
Down - lug
4, 2006
qG
,9
G9s
S
Se
q�
f�
Clarifier
#
ak
n D
, 2006
OolLP
OL-fs
.
boa
2
y
0
Oec�
i.
o@es
azpmDc-
c-
>
-+mo
o
�D
e
O
c•►
0
m
C
cc
C
—�
C
0
-9
4)
�D
��
01
0 m
S
V
A
W
W
V1
(O
4J
4)
W
V
OAf
W
iVJI
00
O
.O
m
N�
-�
W
N
O
Ul
0
0
V
V
--
N
y
hi
W
A
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
,Op
N
W
V
01
lD
N
A
N
oo
�,1WOI,VV
AN�....�
N
A
W
W
Ncn0-IO'.a
Vcn
-
V
O
O
O
p
W
W
O
�p
�
.
•
N
cn
cfl
�wfa00
N�-�N
<
3
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
C)O
O
O
CDO
O
O
O
O
CD
O
CDO
O
O
O
O
C)O
O
3
w
to
00000000000o�
00O000000000-r
3
C
O
A
A
W
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
r
v
0 0
o���00000000�0
N!
S
ca
W
N
.-
C n
C) �
N 0
O �
� O
O 0
Q
N =
'o2
G) Q
(CD
N
X

Figure 4 - Effluent Flow Rates by Week
January 2006 to November 2006
Month
Avg Eff Flow Rate
Max Eff Flow Rate
Min, Eff Flow Rate
MGD
MGD
MGD
Jan-06
0.91
1.6
0.4
Feb-06
0.8
1.42
0.31
Mar-06
0.92
1.38
0.1
A r-06
0.87
1.58
0.3
Ma -06
0.96
1.6
0.29
Jun-06
1.04
1.69
0.3
Jul-06
0.83 >
1.48
0.3
Au -06
0.98
1.6
0.36
Se -06
0.78
2.06
0.38
Oct-06
0.65
1.38
0.31
Nov-06
0.77
1.83
0.33
Dec-06
2006 Effluent Flow Rates
2.5
2
o '
1.5
m
-�Avf Eff Flow Rate
-F Max Eff Flow Rate
c 1 Min Eff Flow Rate
LL
0.5
0
Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06
Date

(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance
Coverage Provided)
For delivery Information visit our
website at www.usps.como
OFF�C�AL
USE
T Postage
Certified Fee
=1 Return Receipt Fee
fn)q
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
J3
T
L
se MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
J3 TOWN OF CRAMERTON
--------------
� or' 155 NORTH MAIN STREET
c� CRAMERTON NC 28032
--------------
swp/ma 12/14/06 �Isl�

;ertified Mail Provides:
A mailing receipt
A unique identifier for your mailplece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
aportant Reminders:
I Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail
I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
i NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
i For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested'. To receive a fee waiver foi
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt le
required.
I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailplece with the
endorsement 'Restricted Delivery.
i If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti•
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
MPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an Inquiry.
IS Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

$ 1,000.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly average effluent
limit for BOD.
000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 80.15 Enforcement costs.
$ 2,080.15 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4)- The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5)- The amount of money saved by noncompliance;.
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:

Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of -Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center.'
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty"assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right -to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to -the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved; the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director, of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty

jzv-
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver. of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition`with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business. days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
- Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources

1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a.postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities then
you may wish to consider qpplying for a Special Order by Consent. If you have M questions
about this- civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.
(Date)
ATTACHMENTS
s
Samar Bou-Ghazale
Surface Water Protection.
Acting Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
MA

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0480
Outfall
Parameter
Reported Value Permit Limit
001
Fecal coliform
1,031/100 ml* 400/100 ml (Weekly geometric mean) . —
001
Fecal coliform
834/100 ml* 400/100 ml (Weekly -geometric mean)
.001
BOD,
21.3 mg/l* 15.0 mg/l (Weekly average)
001
BOD
27.7 mg/l* 15.0 mg/l (Weekly average)
001
BOD
13.3 mg/l* 10.0 mg/l (Monthly average)
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $2,080.15 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated December 14, 2006, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
`the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of
ADDRESS
2006

v.,
4 0
1�.Z�� 7,t�
JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REOUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2006-0480
Assessed Party:- The Town of Cramerton
_County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033.
Amount Assessed:$2,080.15
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty.. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver ofRight to an Administrative Bearink, and Stipulation ofFacts
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any, documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to, consider in evaluating your request for,
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether -the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to N.0 " G.S. I § 143B-282. 1 (c), remission of a -'civil penalty may be granted only when. one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penally assessment factors inN.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation - (i.e.,, explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertentora result of an accident (i. e., explain why the violation
'was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations-,
(e) payment of the civil penally will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you fromperforming the
.activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:, (use additional pages as necessary)

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your.name and address on the reverse
so that w6 can return the card to you.
t Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the, front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
MR 1Vf1CHAEL.PEOPLES, TOWN.MGR.
TOWN -OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
�, swp/ma 12/14/06
A.
❑ Agent
received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Deliver
D. °Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below- ❑ No
rvice Type Se
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Retum•Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
1, 8493. 4.513
).0 Gnrm RAi 1 Fehmnn onnA 0...W inogorso_Kmre

UNITED STATES
15- IF-,
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 In this box
�NCDENR
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION
610 PAST CENTER AVE
SUITE 301
MOORESVILLE NC 2811i.5.�-^
6D

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 17, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 1680 0000 0647 1517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Town of Cramerton WWTP
Case Number LV-2007-0228
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
APR .2 1 2008
NC DER MR®
DiN-Surtoce Water Protection
A final agency decision on your request for remission of the subject civil penalty will be made by the
Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on Thursday, May 8,.2008.
No request for oral presentation was made.. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be
permitted to speak regarding your case.
V/ The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that no oral presentation
will be made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be permitted to speak regarding
your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that an oral presentation is
necessary. Please come prepared to present your remission request at this meeting. You will be
allowed approximately five (5) minutes to speak. Please be advised that the Committee cannot
consider any information other than that submitted in the original remission request. Please note,
the State Bar's recent Opinion regarding the unauthorized practice of law affects your method of
presenting at the Committee.
If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation
before the Committee, then you do not need legal representation before,the Con1mittee; however,' if you
intend on having another individual speak on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an
expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the meeting in order to avoid
violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law. NorthCarolina
,Natura!!1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www riewaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
LV-2007-0228 CCPR Notification
p. 2
If you are a corporation, partnership or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral
presentation before the Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's
Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a licenseif he or she is not a licensed attorney.
Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
Also, be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with the
hearing of a case if the Committee is infonned that a potential violation of the of the statute regarding
the unauthorized practice of law has occurred.
Time and Location of Meeting
The Committee will convene at 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission.. The Committee meeting
will be held in the Crime Control & Public Safety Conference Room (Room G24), on the ground floor
of the Archdale Building, located at 512 North Salisbury Street in Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
map).
Other Things to Know About The Meeting
The length of an Environmental Management Commission meeting is determined by its agenda of the
day and the amount of discussion given to each topic — meetings often extend into the early afternoon.
You are advised to arrive for the Committee meeting no later than 11:00 a.m. in order to ensure your
opportunity to listen to consideration of your case in the event that the Committee begins at its appointed
time. If the Commission meeting runs'long and you need refreshment or food, Division'of Water
Quality staff can direct you to a canteen/snack bar that is located on the basement floor of the Archdale
Building or to other local eateries.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Sledge of the Point Source Branch at
[phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
enclosure
cc: oor�s-v llgle Regional Ef to
Enforcement File
Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources
April 17, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 1680 0000 0647 1517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton .
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Town of Cramerton WWTP
Case Number LV-2007-0227
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
jPit �",'•: .lid V
Cs! rs� Ci 7 PJ
APR 2 1 2008
NC DENR MR®
DVl-Q-Surface Voter. Protection
A final agency decision on your request for remission of the subject civil penalty will be made by the
Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on Thursday, May 8, 2008.
No request for oral presentation was made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be
permitted to speak regarding your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that no oral presentation
will be made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be permitted to speak regarding
your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that an oral presentation is
necessary. Please come prepared to present your remission request at this meeting.. You will be
allowed approximately five (5) minutes to speak. Please be advised that the Committee cannot
considerany information other than that submitted in the original remission request. Please note,
the State Bar's recent Opinion regarding the unauthorized practice of law affects your method of
presenting at the Committee.
If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation
before the Committee, then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however, if you
intend on having another individual speak on.your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an
expert, engineer of consultant, then you'must also be present at the meeting in order to avoid
violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law. olle
NorthCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newaterquality.or Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
LV-2007-0227 CCPR Notification
p• 2
If you are a corporation, partnership or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral
presentation before the Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's
Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a license if he or she is not a licensed attorney.
Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
Also advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with the..
hearing of a case if the Committee is informed that a potential violation of the of the statute regarding
the unauthorized practice of law has occurred.
_Time and Location of Meeting
The Committee will convene at 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission. The Committee meeting
will be held in the Crime .Control & Public Safety Conference Room (Room G24), on the ground floor
of the Archdale Building, located at 512 North Salisbury Street in Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
map).
Other Things to Know About The Meetins
The Jength of an Environmental Management Commission meeting is determined by its agenda of the
day and the amount of discussion given to each topic - meetings often extend into the early afternoon.
You are advised to arrive for the Committee meeting no later than 11:00 a.m. in order to ensure your
opportunity to listen to consideration of your case in the event that the Committee begins at its appointed
time. If the Commission meeting runs long and you need refreshment or food, Division of Water
Quality staff can direct you to a canteen/snack bar that is located on the basement floor of the Archdale
Building or. to other local eateries.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Sledge of -the Point Source Branch at
[phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
-OV— //°M�_
Coleen H. Sullins
enclosure
cc: ooresvlle Regional Office
Enforcement File
Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G..Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 17, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 1680 0000 0647 1517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Town of Cramerton WWTP
Case Number LV-2007-0226
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
�9
APR 2 1 2008
N DENR Miplo
DW-S-urfao�-', WotOr Protedlon
A final agency decision on your request for remission of the subject.civil penalty will be made by the
Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee) of the Environmental, Management Commission
(EMC) on Thursday, May 8, 2008.
No request for oral presentation was made. You may attend this. meeting, but you will not be
permitted to speak regarding your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that no oral presentation
will be made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be permitted to speak regarding
your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the. written record and determined that an oral presentation is
necessary. Please come prepared to present your remission request at this meeting. You will be
allowed approximately five (5) minutes to speak. Please be advised that the Committee cannot
consider any information other than that submitted in the original remission request. Please note,
the State Bar's recent -Opinion regarding the unauthorized practice of law affects your method of
presenting at the Committee.
If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation
before the Committee, then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however, if you
intend on having another individual speak on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an
expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the meeting in order to avoid
violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law. NorthCarolina
,NrriuM1111
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-161.7 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.oro Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
LV-2007-0226 CCPR Notification
p. 2
If you are a corporation partnership or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral
presentation before the Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's .
Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a license if he or she is not a licensed attorney.
Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
Also, be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with the
hearing of a case if the Committee is informed that a potential violation of the of the statute regarding
the unauthorized practice of law has occurred.
Time and Location of Meeting
The Committee will convene at 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission. The Committee meeting.
will be held in the Crime Control & Public Safety Conference Room (Room G24), on the ground floor
of the Archdale Building, located at 512 North Salisbury Street in Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
map).
Other Things to Know About The Meeting
The length of an Environmental Management Commission meeting is determined by its agenda of the
day and the amount of discussion given to each topic — meetings often extend into the early afternoon.
You are advised to arrive for the Committee meeting no later than 11:00 a.m. in order to ensure your
opportunity to listen to consideration of your case in the event that the Committee begins at its appointed
time. If the Commission meeting runs long and you need refreshment or food, Division of Water
Quality staff can direct you to a canteen/snack bar that is located on the basement floor of the Archdale
Building or to other local eateries.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Sledge of the Point Source Branch at
[phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
VL / -��Vsrl
Coleen H. Sullins
enclosure
cc: Maoresvif% R�egiana ��' e a ee
Enforcement File
Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 17, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 1680 0000 0647 1517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton .
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Town of Cramerton WWTP
Case Number LV-2006-0480
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples: .
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
APR 2 1 2008
NC DENR MRO
DWG -Surface Water Protection
A final agency decision on your request for remission of the subject civil penalty will be made by the
Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on Thursday, May 8, 2008.
No request for oral presentation was made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be
permitted to speak regarding your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that no oral presentation
will be made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be permitted to speak regarding
your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the-writtedrecord and determined that an oral presentation is
necessary. Please come prepared to present your remission request at this meeting. You will be
allowed approximately five (5) minutes to speak. Please be advised that the Committee cannot
consider any information other than that submitted in the original remission request. Please note,
the State Bar's recent Opinion regarding the unauthorized practice of law, affects your method of
presenting at the Committee.
If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation
before the Committee, then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however;.if you
intend on having another individual speak on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an
expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the meeting in order to avoid
violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law. No'rthcarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
LV-2006-0480 CCPR Notification
p. 2
If you are a corporation, partnership or municipality and are. granted an opportunity to make an oral
presentation before the Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's
Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a license if he or she is not a licensed attorney.
Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
Also, be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with the
hearing of a case if the Committee is informed that a potential violation of the of the statute regarding
the unauthorized practice of law has occurred.
Time and Location of Meetins
The Committee will convene at 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission. The Committee meeting
will be held in the Crime Control & Public Safety Conference Room (Room G24), on the ground floor
of the Archdale Building, located at 512 North Salisbury Street in Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
map).
Other Things to Know About The Meeting
The length of an Environmental Management Commission meeting is determined by its agenda of the
day and the amount of discussion given to each topic — meetings often extend into the early afternoon..
You are advised to arrive for the Committee meeting no later than 11:00 a.m. in order to ensure your
opportunity to listen to consideration of your case in the event that the Committee begins at its appointed
time. If the Commission meeting runs long and you need refreshment or food, Division of Water
Quality staff can direct you to a canteen/snack bar that is located on the basement floor of the Archdale
Building or to other local eateries.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Sledge of the Point Source Branch at
[phone], `ektensi on. 547.
Sincerely,
�. Coleen H. Sullins
enclosure
cc: ilsleM&g- Iona � , jce
Enforcement File
Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 17, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 1680 0000 0647 1517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty -
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Town of Cramerton WWTP .
Case Number LV-2007-0230
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Colleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
APR 21 2008
NC DENWRO
DINQ-Surtc.cc Water Protection
A final agency decision on your request for remission of the subject civil penalty will be made by the
Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on Thursday, May 8, 2008.
No request for oral presentation was made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be
permitted to speak regarding your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that no oral presentation
will be made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be permitted to speak regarding
your case.
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that an oral presentation is
necessary. Please come prepared to present your remission request at this meeting. You will be
allowed approximately five (5) minutes to speak. Please be advised that the Committee cannot
consider any information other than that submitted in the original remission request. Please note,
the State Bar's.recent Opinion regarding the unauthorized practice of law affects your method of
presenting at the Committee.
If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make am oral presentation
before the Committee, then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however, if you
intend on having another individual speak on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an
expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the meeting in order to avoid
violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law. 011C
NorthCarolina
,Natura!!�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael C. Peoples
LV-2007-0230 CCPR Notification
p. 2
If you are a corporation, partnership or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral
presentation before the Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's
Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a license if he or she is not a licensed attorney.
Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
Also,.be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with the
hearing of a case if the Committee is informed that a potential violation of the of the statute regarding
the unauthorized practice of law has occurred.
Time and Location of Meeting
The Committee will convene at 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission. The Committee meeting
will be held in the Crime Control & Public Safety Conference Room (Room G24)1 on the ground floor
of the Archdale Building, located at 512 North Salisbury Street in Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
map).
Other Things to Know About The Meeting
The length of an Environmental Management Commission meeting is determined by its agenda of the
day and the amount of discussion given to each topic — meetings often extend into the early afternoon.
You are advised to arrive for the Committee meeting no later than 11:00 a.m. in order to ensure your
opportunity to listen to consideration of your case in the event that the Committee begins at its appointed
time. If the Commission meeting runs long and you need refreshment or food, Division of Water
Quality staff can direct you to a canteen/snack bar that is located on the basement floor of the Archdale
Building or to other local eateries. ,
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Sledge of the Point Source Branch at
[phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
enclosure
cc: ".ore, ll ffig final .Office
Enforcement File
Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G: Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 17, 2008
CERTIFIED'MAIL 7003 168Q 0000 0647 1517
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Town of Cramerton WWTP
Case Number LV-2007-0229
NPDES Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
RLL �(IVc D
APR 2 1 2008
NC DER MRO
M-Surface Wolter Protection
A final agency decision on your request for remission of the subject civil penalty will be made by the
Committee On Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on Thursday, May 8, 2008.
No request for oral presentation was made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be
permitted to speak regarding your case.
The E.M.0 Chairman has considered the written record and determined that no oral presentation
will be made. You may attend this meeting, but you will not be permitted to speak regarding
your case.
0
The EMC Chairman has considered the written record and determined that an oral presentation is
necessary. Please come prepared to present your remission request at this meeting. You will be
allowed approximately five (5) minutes to speak. Please be advised that the Committee cannot
consider any information other than that submitted in the original remission request. Please note,
the State Bar's recent Opinion regarding the unauthorized practice of'law affecfs your method�bf
presenting at the Committee.
If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an -oral presentation
before the Committee, then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however, if you
intend on having another individual speak on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an
expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the meeting in order to avoid
violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law. One
NorthCarolina
MUMMY
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Michael-C. Peoples
LV-2007-0229 CCPR Notification
p. 2
If you are a corporation, partnership or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral
presentation before the Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's
Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a license if he or she is not a licensed attorney.
Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
Also, be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with the
hearing of a case if the Committee is informed that a potential violation of the of the statute regarding
the unauthorized practice of law has occurred.
Time and Location of Meeting
The Committee will convene at 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the closing of the regularly
scheduled business meeting of the Environmental Management Commission. The Committee meeting
will be held in the Crime Control & Public Safety Conference Room (Room G24), on the ground floor
of the Archdale Building, located at 512 North Salisbury Street in Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
map).
Other Things to Know About The Meeting
The length of an Environmental Management Commission meeting is determined by its agenda of the
day and the amount of discussion given to each topic — meetings often extend into the early afternoon.
You are advised to arrive for the Committee meeting no later than 11:00 a.m. in order to ensure your
opportunity to listen to consideration of your case in the event that the Committee begins at its appointed
time. If the Commission meeting runs long and you need refreshment or food, Division of Water
Quality staff can direct you to a canteen/snack bar that is located on the basement floor of the Archdale
Building or to other local eateries.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Sledge of the Point Source Branch at
[phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
enclosure
cc: ooresma i e �3 gio a1�O
Enforcement File .
Central Files

0
O�0F W A r�i9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 20, 2007
Mr. Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager JUL n
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
�,� r, r p ��:. .. -� j" �`
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment /� 6u �rJ�� V y' g i0
Town of Cramerton WWTP
NPDES Permit NCO0O6O33
Case Numbers LV-2007-0226, LV-2007-0227, LV-2007-0228,
LV-2007-0229 & LV-2007-0230
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:.
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalties levied against the subject
facility. Your request will be scheduled for review by the Director and you will be notified of the result.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at (919) 73375083, extension 547.
Sincerely,
Bob Sledge, Environmental Specialist
Point Source Branch
cc: ooresvll I e ' e Mona a rice w/a - ents
Enforcement File w/originals
Central Files w/attachments
N""o�` Carolina
Nawra!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.ora Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

TOWN of
G71. 17L1
July 13, 2007 ��
`.. .JUL 17 2007 11 I;
,: , , , _�i
Divisi ,
oint Source Compliance_ / Enforcemen n''r
1617 Mail Srvice eten - --
- -
Raleigh, NC' 27699-1617
RE: Notices of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty for
Violations of N.C. General Statute 143.215.1(a)(6) and
NPDES Permit No. NC000006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Town of Cramerton, Gaston County.
SUBJ: Request for Remission of Civil Penalties
Dear Mr. Klimek:
The Town of Cramerton is in receipt of the following five (5) Notices of Violation.:
1. June 19, 2007 - Case No. LV-2007-0226
2. June 19, 2007— Case No. LV-2007-0227
3. June 19, 2007 — Case No. LV-2007-0228
4. June 19, 2007 —Case No. LV-2007-0229
5. June 19, 2007 — Case No. LV-2007-0230
The total penalty assessed for the five Notices of Violation noted above is $9,282.50.
The Town is undertaking the construction of improvements to the Eagle Road WWTP, a
multi -million dollar project funded under SRF Number CS370730-2. The Town has
spent a significant amount of our local resources to wastewater treatment and the
protection of our state's water quality. The construction of the WWTP improvements
has proven to be a challenging due to the necessity of maintaining process treatment
while much of the treatment units required some type of modification. We.are reaching
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

Mr. Alan W. Klimek
July 13, 2007
Page 2 of 2
the completion of the project and should be fully operational by September 2007 meeting
all of our treatment requirements without difficulty.
The purpose of this correspondence and the attached documentation is to request DENR's
remission of the penalties noted above based on the fact that the infractions were
inadvertent, in accordance with N.C.G.S. § 14313-282.1(c)(3). The infractions were
inadvertent due to the nature of construction of the improvements to the Chlorine Contact
Chamber. Significant improvements were made to the Chlorine Contact Chamber that
required the unit to be taken out of service and dewatered. Effort was made to maintain
adequate disinfection while the improvements were constructed. The Town, its
wastewater treatment plant personnel, the town engineer and the contractor implemented
measures to maintain disinfection while construction progressed, as noted in the
attachment. The infractions are only related to the construction of improvements to the
existing Chlorine Contract Chamber and are not the result of negligence on the part of the
Town. It is for this reason we respectfully request your favorable consideration for
remission.
Significant progress is being made towards water quality improvement in Cramerton.
The Town has dedicated significant resources in both time and money towards this end.
We trust DENR will take note of the Town's efforts and commitment to water quality
protections and grant our request for remission. Please let us know if you need additional
information or if we need to schedule a meeting to discuss this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
C-�'
Michael C. Peoples
Town Manager
Attachments
cc: Jamie Shytle (w/ attachments)
Pease Associates (w/ attachments)

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REOUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0226
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $1,831.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; .
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
See Attachment A

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF'ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
FILE NO. LV-2007-0226
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,831.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties; does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the ` day of �tA I 2007
BY
ADDRESS
(ixour-6r\, N c �-
TELEPHONE
may- 902y-- 1-1337

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0227
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton .
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $1,581.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission. Waiver of to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents; as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
See Attachment A

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
FILE NO. LV-2007-0227
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1A1.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the / ?J day of , 2007
C�P
BY
ADDRESS
lvL a9a32
TELEPHONE
-71)(-(- 8a'f- y337

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0228
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $2,081.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation,, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penal will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
See Attachment A

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
FILE NO. LV-2007-0228
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $2,081.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the 13 day of , 2007
�e
BY
ADDRESS
l N""W'
�I?
C g03
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0229
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $1,831.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission. Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of
Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should. attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully pplied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of 'the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
See Attachment A

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON ) , STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
FILE NO. LV-2007-0229
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,831.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the -4 T\ day of 2007
BY
ADDRESS
o a to S4-.
TELEPHONE
Inv-Rd�f `f33%

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2007-0230
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $1,956.50
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request'remission.of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request. and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be- aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five, factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violations) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil .penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. -Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.10b1
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation, and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d). the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
See Attachment A

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST )
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON )
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2007-0230
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,956.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 19, 2007, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in.
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the (� ��^ day of u .2007
BY
ADDRESS
S�-
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST — ATTACHMENT A
DWQ Case Numbers: LV-2007-0226, 0227, 0228, 0229, 0230
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: Total all Five (5) Case Numbers - $9,282.50
JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST FOR REMISSION OF CIVIL PENALTIES:
The Town of Cramerton formally requests remission of the above total civil penalties based on
North Carolina General Statute 143B-282. I (c)(2), (3) and (4).
143B-282.1(c)(2) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation.
143B-282.1(c)(3) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident.
143B-282.1(c)(4) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations.
The treatment plant is currently under construction using State loan funds to improve and
enhance the existing facility and protect the environment. The methods of construction required
continued operation of the plant while critical treatment units had to be taken off line for
upgrades. Also there has been an unexpected reduction in industrial flow, resulting in a
significantly lower flow than originally anticipated. These factors have resulted in the noted
violations (143B-282.1(c)(3). When the ORC noticed the violations he promptly brought the
them to the attention of the Contractor. Representatives of the Town of Cramerton, the
Contractor, and the Project Engineer began to immediately assess the causes and develop a plan
to abate the excursions (143B-282.1(c)(2). The Town has not been assessed a civil penalty for
any infraction at the WWTP prior to the construction period for the project (143B-282.1(c)(4)).
A detailed explanation of the three factors follows.
Item A: The violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident 143B-282.1(c)(3)
In November 2005, the Town of Cramerton entered into a contract with Hickory Construction
and Recore Electric to upgrade the existing Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in order to
enhance its operation and environmental protection. The plant was operating during construction
in 2006 and the early part of 2007 under an SOC that modified limits only on total phosphorus
and total residual chlorine. In late August 2006, the ORC Mr. Jamie Shytle noticed a sharp
increase in BOD and Fecal Coliform readings which exceeded the limits set forth in the Permit.
After reviewing the situation with the Contractor and Project Engineer, Mr. Shytle determined
that the excursions coincided with the shut down of Clarifier No. 1 on August 4, 2006. The shut
down was required in order to perform replacement and upgrading of the clarifier equipment.
The installation of a floating baffle wall had also taken place in the aeration basin shortly prior to
Request for Remission of Civil Penalties related to Fecal Coliform Town of Cramerton, NC
Page 1 of 3

the excursions, which caused increased detention time and saturation of oxygen. Clarifier No. 1
was placed back on line on October 2, 2006 and shortly thereafter Clarifier No. 2 was taken
offline for upgrading. Clarifier No. 2 was placed back on line in November 13, 2006. On
January 2, 2007 the Chlorine Contact Basin was taken off line for upgrading. A temporary
structure was constructed for disinfection during this time and the Chlorine Contact Basin was
placed back on line on January 19, 2007. Much of this information was presented to DENR in
the Town's previous request for an amendment to their SOC.
During the same time period, the effluent flow rates were starting to become sporadic due to the
unexpected phased shut down of the major industry feeding flow to the treatment plant. This
reduced and sporadic flow also caused a biological change in the aeration basin. The detention
time and saturation of oxygen caused a light mass to pass through the basin into the final clarifier
and carry over the weir into the chorine contact tank. Figure 6 shows the Effluent Flow Rates for
January 2006 through June 2007 reflecting this flow trend and its impacts.
The combination of the upgrading of the plant and the phased shut down of the major industry
was unavoidable by the Town and was something that could not have been prevented or for
which it could be prepared.
The Town met with representatives of the Mooresville Regional Office of DENR on January 4,
2007 to discuss the above as part of an amendment to their SOC. The impact that construction
and flow variation had on the ability of the Town to consistently meet its Fecal Coliform limits
was discussed. This resulted in the May 10, 2007 Amendment to the SOC which included
modified limits for BOD5 and TSS.
Tables 1-3 and Figures 1-5 provide effluent data on Fecal Coliform, TSS and BOD5. The
construction events mentioned above are noted on the Figures for reference. Now that the
construction is nearly complete, the plant has demonstrated compliance with all NPDES Permit
Limits.
Item B: The Town Promptly abated damage resulting from the violation 143B-282.1(c)2
Upon learning of the excursions in August 2006 the ORC immediately met with the Contractor
and the Project Engineer to develop a plan to mitigate further excursions. The contractor closely
monitored his construction activities to determine if there were any activities that could be
altered to lessen the impact attributed to the construction operations. The contractor also
minimized the amount of shutdowns to the one operable clarifier. The ORC increased the
amount. of chlorine added to the effluent. The efforts made resulted in the BOD and Fecal
Coliform counts returning to acceptable levels. Test results have shown that the additional
chlorine added to the effluent has had no adverse impact on toxicity.
The contractor's construction schedule called for the newly upgraded Clarifier No. 1 to be
brought back on line on October 2, 2006 and for Clarifier No 2 to be taken off line on October 5,
Request for Remission: of Civil Penalties related to Fecal Coliform Town of Cramerton, NC
Page 2 of 3

2006. This switch over once again caused BOD and Fecal Coliform counts to exceed limits.
This time the BOD was quickly brought back to normal levels and the Fecal Coliform counts
were approaching acceptable levels when the plant was impacted again by reduced flows. The
industry began a more sporadic release of influent into the plant in November and announced an
anticipated total shutdown by the end of the year. This caused a drastic increase in BOD levels,
TSS levels, and continued rise of Fecal Coliform counts.
Continued efforts were made to reduce BOD, TSS, and Fecal Coliform, however the contractor's
continued construction operations added further complications. In order to remediate and
upgrade the existing Chlorine Contact basin, the contractor had to take the Chlorine Contact
Basin off line and utilize a temporary basin. This initially caused a limitation to the amount of
chlorine that could be injected into the effluent and caused high fecal counts. Additional
chlorine tablets were placed in the effluent piping to help with the Fecal Coliform limits,
however the tablets were placed downstream of the sampling point, therefore the samples did not
indicate the benefit of the tablets. The plant operators relocated the booster pump to aid in the
delivery of chlorine. This modified system allowed approximately 100 pounds of chlorine to be
delivered at the discharge point. The plant operators also dropped chlorine tablets in the
temporary chlorine contact basin to help deliver additional chlorine to the effluent. The Town
has also added 12% hypochlorite and 25% NaOH into the effluent to adjust pH. The upgraded
chlorine contact tank is now back in service and the construction project should be complete by
March 9, 2007. The Fecal Coliform counts are now under control with no excursions since
January 2007.
In order to better prepare for the current fluctuations in industrial flow, the Town has met with
the industry and has requested a schedule of release dates as well as a final date of complete
shutdown (now estimated July 2007). This should allow the Town to properly adjust chemical
additives to maintain all levels within limits if adhered to. The upgraded Chlorine Contact Basin
is now back in service and the construction project should be complete by July 2007.
The industry is now completely shut down. This will result in a more consistent flow to the
WWTP and will allow the Town to properly adjust chemical additives to maintain treatment
levels.
Item C: The Town has not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations prior. to
construction of the protect 143B-282.1(c) (4)
Prior to the construction and flow caused excursions in August 2006 and the months following,
the Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant had not been assessed civil penalties for any
previous violations during its ownership and operation of this facility. The Town has pending a
civil penalty remission request for penalties assessed for August, 2006 excursions.
Request for Remission of Civil Penalties related to Fecal Coliform Town of Cramerion, NC
Page 3 of 3

Table 1
Fecal Coliform Weekly & Monthly Averages (colonies per 100ml) 2006-2007
Eagle Road WWTP
Town of Cramerton, NC
Month
Week
NPDES Permit Limits
Deviations from NPDES
Permit
1
2
3
4
5
Monthly
Avg.
Weekly
Avg.
Monthly
Avg.
Weekly
Avg.
Monthly
Avg.
Jan 2006
1
4
1
2
2
400
200
0
0
Feb 2006
2
2
1
1
1
400
200
0
0
Mar 2006
1
1
1
1
1
1
400
200
0
0
Apr 2006
1
6
1
2
2
400
200
0
0
May 2006
6
5
2
2
3
400
200
0
0
Jun 2006
2
30
1
2
15
6
400
200
0
0
Jul 2006
14
7
5
3
6
400
200
0
0
Aug 2006
5
182
1,031
839
168
400
200
2
0
Sep 2006
36
1,756
25
- 572
20,133
582
400
200
3
1
Oct 2006
968
84
1,010
459
641
400
200
3
1
Nov 2006
21,921
2,462
667
27,716
990
400
200
4
1
Dec 2006
15
6,648
22
10,570
.17,155
1,710
400
200
3
1
Jan 2007
48,769
40
1,058
76
279
400
200
2
1
Feb 2007
15
1
1
1
3
400
200
0
0
Mar 2007
23
9
8
42
12
11
400
200
0
0
Apr 2007
7
2
94
4
8
400
200
0
0
May 2007
2
2
2
7
3
400
200
0
0
June 2007
12
4
2
1
3
400
200
0
0
See Figure 1

W
O
NW
W
CD
N
0
N
0
00
NO
NO
O
O
O
O
O,
0
0
ON
0
O*,
O�
D1
0
CD
(7N
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
�--
A
00
00
IN
C
00
O
W
J
00
Q1
00
N
�1
N
00
►-
•-+
�..
LA
.�
A
W
P
Ch
N
0
00
LA
a-,
00
N
A
A
0
0000
O
-'O
-o'
N
�1
O
t1i
O,
G1
�o
�O
N
UI
O
N
N
CD00
W
LA
�1
N
LA
N
N
W
N
--
O
C O
CCCCCCCCCCCCC��
d
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
`C
�zd
O
O
O
O
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cl
� o
b=
y
O
O
"�
0
0
0
—
O
O
0
0
0
0!
3
Vi
vi
cn
t�
vi
vi
cn
to
v�
cn
to
to
to
C p
�' 's
CCCCCCCCCCC0C�
ee
�'
fD
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�C

r_5
E
i.
t
W
Lo
wl
So
.�
c.
O
O
o
o
o
O
o
o
O
O
o
o
o
c
U �
ooOc
o
cOc
00000
o00000000c000
0
rah
O
o v,
A
:x eio
ooNo���noo-�000
bA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C>
o
o
c
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v, .E
a
o
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
a1
to
W)
vi
vi
kn
vi
vi
ti
kn
W)
W)
v)
vi
bD
N
M
p
a
�G
M
00
N
N
O
O
1G
M
N
cM
N
01
cV
cM
In
C1
O
OO
M
DD
n
`6
d
00
O
4
M,
00
l-:
d
d
3
C7
d'
M
N
\G
00
W)
N
r-�
00
00
4
ri
N
N
M
M
C,
M
cn
—
0
0
—
M
N
N
O
N
N
C�
Nr-:
�6
�6
4
4
cV
N
4
N
M
G1
00
�D
O
""
'""
M
to
M
O
O
p
p
O
p
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
p
p
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
',Zm
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NNN
N
ti
ti
0p
Q
¢
Co
�.+
O
>
00
U
ti
w
s.
s-4
O
r

E
0
0
d
G.
N
d
.E
O
O
U
O
C
Z
E
Jq
6
U
To
U
d
LL
100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10.
Figure 1
.Fecal Coliform Weekly Average 2006 - 2007
Eagle Road WWTP
Town of Cramerton. NC
to
NPDES Permit Limit o
c
CO
o cc g
0
NCD
Weekly Average CD
N
Q
N N M
N
400 Colonies per 100ml
N
N
d
>
>
c
cc
J
>
co
o
o
OU)
M N
N
N
p
C .fFf-1
—
c
)
—
O
3
O
tl
C
O
Y
V
c
Cl
M
Y
lC
H
IM
H
c
O
r
N
{Vp
t
+.
O
—
�0
Z
N
z
c
+°
_
c
O
V
a
o
y
ro
c
U
—
U
�
s
c
•�
U
o
r
c.�
1 r M r M r CO' u> N q N T N r CM M M M N v N N 'v CM r M r M to . N: N v N IT
1� l6 d m N L A C. C R m c 3 > > 7 7 0Li d d V V O O m d ICO 10 m N A W 1�0 C C R
Q Q to to to O O z ZOO
Time (Weeks)

50.0
45.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
J
cm
E 25.0
~ 20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
Figure 2
TSS Monthly Average 2006 - 2007
Eagle Road WWTP
Town of Cramerton, NC
to
to
to
f,
N
N
O
O
N
N
�O
N LO
N
Qi
N
c
rn
c c
z
SOC Permit Limit
Monthly Average 45 mg/L
Q
o
>
as
`6a
d d
W
W N
itC_
w
y
0
0
C
m
0
n 3
to 0
00
V
x
'a
c°>
H
cc
N
W
r
•Cc
a
a.
Z.
O Z
ea
N
I-
w
`
? N
m
+'
cc
N
`
ccd
LU
c
= cc
c
�'
o
U
cc
0
w
c
c
V
d
c
cc
s
U
0.0
�} r M r T r M N I N I r M r T r M T
W. N M 1� N N 7 N L L. L L
m 0 o a�i a) 4) cc cca m m cc M a M m 3 3 3
> > > -3 Q Q CO) Co 0 0 z z -3 a LL Q Q -�
Time (Weeks)

O O
O O
Jun-1
Jun-3 .
Jun-5
Jul-2
Jul-4
Aug-2
Aug-4
Sep-2
Sep-4
Oct-1
Oct-3
Nov-,
Nov-3
3 Dec-1
. Dec-3
c�
y Dec-5
Jan-2
Jan-4
Feb-2
Feb-4
Mar-2
Mar-4
Apr-1
Apr-3
May-1
May-3
Jun-1
Jun-3
Jun-5
TSS (mg/L)
N w .A m
O O O O
O O O O
O v CO
O O O
O O O
B
e Wall
Installation
- corn
pie
d in
one day
- June 2
, 2006
Clarifier
No.
1 Taken
o
t of
service
August
, 2006
Cl
rifier No.
1 Place
J ba
k i
service
Octobe
2, 2006
larifier
No. 2 Taken
c
it o
service
Octobe
5, 2006
Clarifier
No. 2 Placed
ba
a
ice - No
ember 13,
2006
Ch
on
tact Ba
in Take
o
of
ervice -January
, 2007
Chl ri
e C t
ct Basin
Placed
ack
n s
rvice - J
nuary 1
.2007
01�
z
v
w m
<
coo
M
9 3
to r:
CD r
M
3 "
U3
r
--I
Cn
Cn
O
M CD
an (D_
O� CD
'r1
U2
CD ItoCD
w
o
p
Z o
n '
N
0
0
V

0
BOD (mg/L)
� � N
O C"
O O O C O
Jun-1
Jun-3
Jun-5
Jul-2
Jul-4
Aug-2
Aug-4
Sep-2
Sep-4
Oct-1
Oct-3
Nov-1
Nov-3
3 Dec-1
Dec-3
y Dec-5
Jan-2
Jan-4
Feb-2
Feb-4
Mar-2
Mar-4
Apr-1
Apr-3
May-1
May-3
Jun-1
Jun-3
Jun-5
N W W
CT� O CJ�
O O C
Baffle
Wall I
istallation
- completed
in one dav
- June
6. 2006
No.
1 Taken out
of servi
e - Augus
4, 2006
Cla
ifier No. 1
Placed ba
k in service
- Octob
Ir 2, 2006
C
arifier No.
2 Taken o
t of service
- Octob
Ir 5, 2006
Clarifier
No. 2 PI
ced back
in service
Nov mb
r 13. 2006
Chlorine
Con
act Bas'
e
- January
. 2007
1
, 2007
Chlori
a Co tact
Basin Placed
back in
service -January
oCp
O
� . n
D 3
- r
B "
r
0

BOD (mg/L)
O Cn O fn O Cn
O O O O O O
Jun-1
Jun-3
Jun-5
Jul-2
Jul-4
Aug-2
Aug-4
Sep-2
Sep-4
Oct-1
Oct-3
Nov-1
Nov-
Dec-1
Dec-3
cD
N Dec-5
Jan-2
Jan-4
Feb-2
Feb-4
Mar-2
Mar-4
Apr-1
Apr-3
May-1
May-3
Jun-1
Jun-3
Jun-5
CO W p A
O Cn O Cn
O O O O
B
ffle Wai
Install
tion - c
mplet
d in one
day -
une 26,
2006 .
larifie
No. 1
keno
t of se
ice - A
gust 4,
2006
`7
zC
arifier
o. 1 Placed
ba
kin se
ice - O
tober
, 2006
fie
No. 2
Taken'Ia
o
t of se
ice - O
tober
, 2006
Clarifier
No
pPlac�ed
back
in servi
. 2006
Ct
lorine
ontact
asi
of se
ice - Ja
uary 2
2007
Chlor
ne on
act Ba
n Plac
d back
in servi
e - Jan
Liary 19
2007
'
� Z
( D v
m
C
D �
co r
co
r
CO
O
v
C� N
G
G U2 X"
—h cD %<
n X D
ID U2
O m
� � O
CD
n
IV
0
0
V

2.500
O M
0
C7
3 1.500
0
c
d
rz
W 1.000
a
0.500
AUl I ;
Figure 6
WWTP Effluent Flow Rates (MGD) 2006 - 2007
Eagle Road WWTP
Town of Cramerton, NC
NPDES Permitted Flow Rate - 4.0 MGD
\A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
� � z Q w c u c z
Time (Months)
Avg. Flow Rate (MGD) Max. Flow Rate (MGD) Min. Flow Rate (MGD)

J U N 1 1 2008
June 9, 2008
North;Caro.lina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources -NC ®��� NfR�
Div. of Water Quality - DWQ-S rfdoe Water Protection
Attention: Mr. Krebs
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: Town of Cramerton Request. to Change
Dean Mr. Krebs:
On behalf of the Town of Cramerton, I would like to change the delegated authority to
sign the DMR reports from myself to Mr. Thomas Jamie Shytle, Public Utilities Director.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at Town
Hall, 704-824-4337 or at mpeoj les(d)cramerto'n.org.
Sincerely, —
Michael C. Peoples
Town Manager
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 5, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0510 0000 5461 5082
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032-1425
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: NOV-2007-LR-0076
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
}��� A. F; � 6 F e� �� •r. �g � b
3. 7h .. 'll fr ' w.y •r
0CY - 8 2001
NC DENR MR®
DWG -Surface Water Protection
This is to inform yop that the Division of Water Quality did not receive your discharge monitoring
report (DMR) for July 2007 in a timely manner. The report arrived in our office on September 26, 2007.
Water quality regulations require that monthly monitoring reports shall be filed no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Failure to submit reports as required
will subject the violator to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per violation.
To prevent further action, please submit this report to the Division's Central Files office at the letterhead
address within 15 days or notify this office as to any problem preventing its timely receipt. You will be
considered noncompliant with the self -monitoring requirements of your NPDES permit until the report
has been submitted. Additional action, including the assessment of civil penalties, may be taken if the
report is not submitted within the time frame specified above.
This letter additionally provides notice that this office will recommend the assessment of civil penalties
if future reports are not received within the required time frame during the next twelve (12) reporting
months. The Division must -take these steps because timely submittal of discharge monitoring reports is
essential to the efficient operation of our water quality programs. We appreciate your assistance in this
matter. If you have any questions about this letter or discharge monitoring reports, please contact Bob
Sledge at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
�. Susan A. Wilson, Supervisor
NPDES Western Unit
cc: NPDES Enforcement File
00Fe�yA 1 E ' e1!OII �fiFTCtr One
NorthCarolina
Central Files 11vaturZ4
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newatergualiU.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
----An_Equal 0pportunity111firmative.Action Employer —50% Recycled/1 0% Post Consumer Paper

r
' � .. f

�Re: Cramerton NC0006033
Subject: Re: Cramerton NC0006033
From: Marcia Allocco.<[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:26:21 -0400
To: Jamie Shytle <[e-mail]>
Hi Jamie,
Thanks for the update. I'll print this e-mail and place it in your file. The.
inspectors may want to 'review any paperwork you have regarding the loss.of power when
reviewing your records during the next inspection but otherwise you don't have to
submit any paperwork to me.
Thanks,
Marcia
Jamie Shytle wrote:
Marcia
I'm sorry it has taken'so long to get back with you.
On August 29, 2006 the"Eagle Road WWTP experienced a loss -of electrical power
supply due to severe thunderstorm activity. As a result we lost numerous pieces of
equipment including our influent and effluent composite samplers. Therefore we did
not.have sufficient sample.volumes to send out for analysis.
If you need any supporting documentation or additional data, just let me know.
Thanks for your patience.
Jamie Shytle
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcia Allocco" <[e-mail]>
To: "Jamie Shytle" <[e-mail] >
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Cramerton NC000.603.3
Hi Jamie,
Just wanted to check and see how your move is going and if you had any time to
research the missing monitoring data from August 2006. Hope all is well.
Marcia Allocco
Jamie Shytle wrote:
Dear Marcia
We are in the process of moving our lab and plant operations into a new
facility. I'm sure you remember the mass of confusion when your offices
moved from Main St. to Center Ave.
Our phones are not operational to date and have been down for 7=10 days. The
voice mail message center on 704-825-7499 has been down for weeks.
Our email has changed from bellsouth to Time Warner.
In a nut shell --- our communications have been all screwed up !!
Most likely it was a result of electrical or instrumentation failures
associated with our effluent composite sampling device(s).
We have been in a facilities upgrade for over a year and as a result we have
had instances where equipment change -outs and electrical service changes
have caused operational and compliance sampling problems.
I will let you know what caused.the missed event(s) as soon as I can find
out.
Thanks for your patience.
Jamie Shytle, Utilities Director
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main Street
.Cramerton, NC 28032
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
1 of 2 6/8/2007 1:27 PM

Re' Cramerton NC0006033
Marcia,Allocco - [e-mail]
Environmental Chemist
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Group
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Marcia Allocco - [e-mail]
Environmental Chemist
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Group
,610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville., NC 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
2 of 2 A/R/?007 1.77 PM

/I
��2

$ 750.00 For 3 of the three (3) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
$ \ 1000.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
�` 215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit✓No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the wars of the State in
violation of the permit mo4thly geometric mean
effluent limit for fecal coliform.
r
$ 1. 50.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
E
Enforcement
MIM
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in deti
into account the Findings of Fact ankonciusi
282.1(b), which are:
UNT DUE
ning the amount of the penalty I have taken
of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
(1) The degree and exteKt of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to priv i e property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration ar d gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect ongroundor surface w - er quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost oVectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by nonco pliance;
(6) Whethe/the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Managemenf�Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) Z The cost to the State of the enforcement
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of

1(0#1*,0+vPe a les
Architects -Engineers
January 12, 2007
Mr. Alan W. Klimek
Director
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Pease Associates - Main Office
2925 East Independence Blvd.
Post Office Box 18725
Charlotte, NC 28218
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Reference: Town of Cramerton, Eagle Road WWTP
Lincolnton, North Carolina
EMC SOC WQ S05-010
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Case No. LV-2006-0480
Pease Associates' Commission No. 2002040.50
Subject: Remission Request
Dear Mr. Klimek:
Pease Associates - Ashe County
One North Jefferson Avenue
Suite E
West Jefferson, NC 25694
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
On the 15' of December, 2006, the Town of Cramerton received a Notice of Violation and Assessment
of Civil Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES permit No.
NC0006033 for the Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. Attached is the "Waiver of Right to an
Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form as well as the "Justification for Remission
Request."
We look forward to your review and consideration of the Town of Cramerton's Request for
Remission. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Donald T. Larbrick, PE, President
DTG/jmb
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Michael C. Peoples, Town of Cramerton
Mr. J. Michael Barnes, Pease Associates
Over 65 years of architectural and engineering design excellence
U:\200204050010 - NOV remission request011207.doc

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
THE TOWN OF CRAMERTON
PERMIT NO. NC0006033
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINSTRATIVE H EARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2006-0480
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $2,080.15 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated December 14, 2006, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the director of the Division of Water
Quality within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the eleventh day of J nu'M , 2006
BY
ADDRESS
Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
TELEPHONE
704/824-4337

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REOUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2006-0480
Assessed Party: The Town of Cramerton
County: Gaston
Permit Number: NC0006033
Amount Assessed: $2,080.15
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully Uplied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
✓ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
✓ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining_ necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
The Town of Cramerton formally requests remission of the total civil penalty assessed* and
believes that three of the five factors above (b, c, and d) apply to the current situation at the
treatment plant. The treatment plant is currently under construction using State loan funds to
*The penalty assessed results from August 2006 data reported to the State. Reports from September through November 2006 also indicate
excursions and the Town is requesting forbearance of assessing penalties for those months also. The Town is separately requesting an
amendment of its existing SOC during remaining construction time to address these parameters and remedial steps

improve and enhance the existing facility and the protection of the environment and the methods
of construction required to maintain continued operation of the plant, in conjunction with an
unexpected reduction in industrial flow, resulted in the violations (item c above). Once the ORC
noticed the violations, he promptly brought the violations to the attention of the Contractor and
the Contractor, Town, and Project Engineer began to immediately assess the causes and develop
a plan to abate the excursions (item b above.) The excursions were contrary to the Town's
record of continued operation below limits and lack of previous penalties (item d above).
Detailed explanation of the three factors follows.
Item C: The violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident
In November 2005, the Town of Cramerton entered into a contract with Hickory Construction
and Recore Electric to upgrade the existing Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Plant in order to
enhance its operation and environmental protection. The plant during construction has been
operating under an SOC that modified limits only on total phosphorus and total residual chlorine.
In late August 2006, the ORC Mr. Jamie Shytle noticed a sharp increase in BOD and Fecal
Coliform readings which exceeded the limits set forth in the Permit. After reviewing the
situation with the Contractor and Project Engineer, Mr. Shytle determined that the excursions
coincided with the shut down of one of the two clarifiers on site (August 4, 2006) as shown in
Figures 1, 2, and 3. The shut down was required in order to perform replacement and upgrading
of the clarifier equipment. The installation of a floating baffle wall had also taken place in the
aeration basin shortly prior to the excursions, which caused increased detention time and
saturation of oxygen.
During the same time period, the effluent flow rates were starting to become sporadic due to the
unexpected phased shut down of the major industry, feeding flow to the treatment plant. This
reduced and sporadic flow also caused a biological change in the aeration basin. The detention
time and saturation of oxygen caused a light mass to pass through the basin into the final clarifier
and carry over the weir into the chorine contact tank. Figure 4 shows the Effluent Flow Rates for
January 2006 through November 2006 reflecting this flow trend and its impacts.
The combination of the upgrading of the plant and the phased shut down of the major industry
was unavoidable by the Town and was something that could not have been prevented or for
which it could be prepared. An SOC Amendment has been submitted for approval. to modify
limits on these additional parameters for the remaining duration of construction and is attached
for your information.
Item B: The Town Promptly abated damage resulting from the violation
Upon learning of the excursions, the ORC immediately met with the Contractor and the Project
Engineer to develop a plan to mitigate further excursions. The contractor closely monitored his
construction activities to determine if there were any activities that could be altered to lessen the
impact attributed to the construction operations. The contractor also minimized the amount of
shutdowns to the one operable clarifier. The ORC increased the amount of chlorine added to the
effluent. The efforts made resulted in the BOD and Fecal Coliform counts returning to

acceptable levels as shown in Figures 1 and 3. Test results have shown that the additional
chlorine added to the effluent has had no adverse impact on toxicity.
The contractor's construction schedule called for the switch from the existing clarifier to the
newly upgraded clarifier with Clarifier #2 completely shut down on October 5, 2006. This
switch over once again caused BOD and Fecal Coliform counts to exceed limits. This time the
BOD was quickly brought back to normal levels and the Fecal Coliform counts were
approaching acceptable levels when the plant was impacted again by reduced flows. The
industry began a more sporadic release of influent into the plant in November and announced an
anticipated total shutdown by the end of the year. This caused a drastic increase in BOD levels,
TSS levels, and continued rise of Fecal Coliform counts.
Continued efforts were made to reduce BOD, TSS, and Fecal Coliform, however the contractors
continued construction operations added further complications. In order to remediate and
upgrade the existing chlorine contact tank, the contractor has had to bypass into a temporary
tank. This initially caused a limitation to the amount of chlorine that could be injected into the
effluent and caused high fecal counts. Additional chlorine tablets were placed in the effluent
piping to help with the Fecal Coliform limits, however the tablets were placed downstream of the
sampling point therefore the samples did not indicate the benefit of the tablets. The plant
operators have relocated a booster pump to aid in the delivery of chlorine. This modified system
will allow approximately 100 pounds of chlorine to be delivered at the discharge point. The
plant operators have also dropped chlorine tablets in the temporary chlorine contact tank to help
deliver additional chlorine to the effluent. The Town has also now started dripping 12%
hypochlorite and 25% NaOH into the effluent and is receiving higher residual values. The Town
believes that the fecal coliform counts are now under control with no adverse impact to toxicity.
In order to better prepare for the current fluctuations in industrial flow, the Town has met with
the industry and has requested a schedule of release dates as well as a final date of complete
shutdown (now estimated March 2007). This should allow the Town to properly adjust chemical
additives to maintain all levels within limits if adhered to. The upgraded chlorine contact tank
should be back in service by the end of January and the construction project should be complete
by March 9, 2007.
Item D: The Town has not been assessed civil Penalties for any previous violations
Prior to the construction and flow caused excursions in August 2006, the Eagle Road Wastewater
Treatment Plant had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations during its
ownership and operation of this facility.

Y
d
d
o
O
.0 N
N
U
!A E
C a)
CD >
cV`6 Z
t
U c
cc
O
m CU
r �
CD
7 �
d7
LL
�
r
�0000000.-orr.o
C
o
O�
m
0
E
�e
J
000000000400400
J
>,
Ln
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
La
LO
LO
LO
LO
i-
Y
d
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
d
E
.J .
>%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
=
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
c
O
>
OM(OML-:(DMNON
Q
f
M
M
O
N
M
f-�
N
tioo0°p
O�IION�^
ao
L{y
oMN
M<DLD
-
N�
V
00ICT
COgLgOCOrqOO
V-
LDNItNLDNOM
~M
Y
d
M
W
co
I'-
co
00100
0
00
c?0)
er
OOM
NOd
rN66
N
O
LO
O�
p
OOD
1
01
F
q
I�LL)MLO
.:NMNOr
V
r
�MMN00'1
co'm
LAC
�
I*
co
m
LO
w
C
.Q
V
C
•+
>
v
s,
�0
a0
z0.
°p
70
2'
oy
syL1
O
�VOO
'S;
�
90C
Z
O - UA
AO(] u
Hel
# jou
liBI3
00
eS
aS
S6
�b
�b
goog
It Br
y - u
oQ u
)Iel
# jail
JBI3
t sib
n
2�4
n
900
'9Z a
n f -
}Le;
pogo
ipu
3 Ile
GLUI
8
s G�
n
AO
�n
�G
d,
N�
4�
ab
2�a
b
SyA
ell
`J
�a.
a
29d
Y
S4
`On
E;G
Nn
tG�n

Y
N
N
�o
O
N
c�CD
CD
m
5 E
Z
L O
Uo
Cl) N
H
N 7
C
7
OT
U-
y
c
t
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
o
o
9
0
C
Y
J
>,
L0LOLO►ninLOLOu>U)LoLOu)
�t't't't
V-"td'4-"t"t
tIt
Y
d
d
E
J
>%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t
O M
M
m
M
M
M
CM
M
M
m
co
M
C
0
Q
0000CNN�
r
00
N
In
T
N
In
n
OMN
cq
lco
LD��OrO�
rNrNN
.
�N�ON�MU
O
Ofl
CO
N�tnODrwwco
^
d
d
M
cNNNNT7MccooC!
cq
mt
m
co�ON
T
co
�N
.
Oo
OOl
N
N
Iq
Oo
OD
In
d
to
N
�tOCr1Nu7OO@76�N�
cgr—
O�
r
r
1.,D
T
T
I,--
cV
O
�To00Lgr.,
o
T
�r-pjLn
0r-:NLfjTOToco
r
r
N
+�+
G
���a�>>Q'm0za
.0
V
Ccc
CL,.
>
Oi
�
sU
a0
a0
t�
ap
o,L
10,
s fJ
e
JO
2b,
�b
�b
e6
n
n
S4
7n
�n
�n
a�
�J
°b
2ya
b
sy�
IlL
�G
a�
a
y
29
a
y
an
`n4
a„
O�
-0
N
O.
0000
CEO
L
d-
cM
900Z
'S ��O
umop
a
1
# �a�l�
I�
900Z
6ny -
unnoa
a�
1
gal;u
i�

Y
m
a�
.0
c� m
0
y N
c0 >
U Z
O
to. O
00
U N
U f6
Gl �
LL C
N
M
d
7
_O
LL
r
y C
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
T
0
O O
�
d
.
O
Y
J �000000aNMef
o
w
E
J
>%
O
o
O
0
O
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
Y
�v���v�t�t�r�t�d•
d
aD
E
J
�N000000000000
0000OOOOOOOO
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
O
Q
NTTNNcocow;:%.R
T
O>
cp
O
�
N
vj
1p
N
T
T
T
O
00
V-
to
LIi
O
1"
N
N
m�
a?
Ln
N
ch
M
x-
st
N
T
T
T
T
T
LV
Y
ao
uj
N
d
m
M
d
cV
cQM
T
MLnu7Mf1FNC
T
T
T
N
T
N
cc
N
tiles
rcogCD
� Tui`q
�
co
v:
MTTcoNN(OOoL6mto
r
T
co
m
T
C")
•�
T
T
T
LO
LO
t
C
C
A
R
R
C
CD
v
0'd
•�ii�Q��'�Q(/��ZG
s�
ap
U.
ap
ap
10
10,
sy�
0
�7-
0
a-
Ae
# Jag
Je10
900Z '
e f
00
s
�a
as
s6,
�b
�6
�b
900Z It 6n
tf - umoa u
oel
# jam
jon .
is
�b
^
ek
^
nr - spe;g
uos;
nilsuc
O peM ajme
900Z '9Z a
S:G
o„
e4
O^
Pwp
Zr
a�
�J
ab
b
s J�
�1
�u
A9
91,
�9
,
sG
`6^
`n0
�4
�^
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
Cl
O O
�
O

Figure 4 - Effluent Flow Rates by Week
January 2006 to November 2006
Month
Avg Eff Flow Rate
Max Eff Flow Rate
Min Eff Flow Rate
MGD
MGD
MGD
Jan-06
0.91
1.6
0.4
Feb-06
0.8
1.42
0.31
Mar-06
0.92
1.38
0.1
A r-06
0.87
1.58
0.3
Ma -06
0.96
1.6
0.29
Jun-06
1.04
1.69
0.3
Jul-06
0.83
1.48
0.3
Au -06
0.98
1.6
0.36
Se -06
-0.78
2.06
0.38
Oct-06
0.65
1.38
0.31
Nov-06
0.77
1'.83
0.33
Dec-06
2006 Effluent Flow Rates
2.5
2
0
1.5
d
-6 Avf Eff Flow Rate
v -IF Max Eff Flow Rate
D:
0 1
-�- Min Eff Flow Rate
LL
0.5
0
Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-O6 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06
Date

CRAMERTON
CAR0*''
PUBLIC WORKS / UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION
155 North Main Street. Cramerton NC 28032,,Jl=p! try-
December 28, 2006 / �®NATURAL SOURCES
MOOgESVILLFREGIONAL OFFICE
- ,. F.�
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNR / DWQ
Mooresville Regional Office
Dear Mr. Gleason:
JAN 0 35 2007
AIM, U L r iY SE T1 1jd`
V4 .
SUBJECT: Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. N00006033
SOC / EMC No. WQ S05 — 010
Noncompliance with effluent discharge limits
The Eagle Road WWTP failed to meet monthly and weekly effluent discharge limits for BOD-5, TSS,
fecal coliform, and % removal for BOD and TSS during the month of November 2006. I have attached a
copy of our November DMR for your review.
As you are aware our facility is currently involved in an upgrade. One component of the upgrade includes
repairs and retrofitting the chlorine contact tank with additional baffling walls, and dechlorination
equipment with post aeration.
To perform this work the existing chlorine contact infrastructure has been removed from service and one
of the new secondary clarifiers is being utilized as a temporary reaction and detention vessel.
In addition we have received influent and effluent sample data from our contract laboratory that indicates
improper handling and/or errors in analytical protocols that have skewed reporting averages. This has
been reported to the laboratory manager. for review.
All the non-compliance issues reported since August 2006 are related to equipment replacements, flow
hydraulics profile modifications, and other efforts made by our general contractor to facilitate our wwtp
upgrade.
We are meeting with senior staff engineers from our design engineering firm in order to resolve any
further construction efforts that may attribute to or cause any further non-compliance issues.

46

If you have any questions or need additional information please call or email me at:
704-825-7499 [e-mail]
bellsouth_net
Thank you
Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton, POTW Director
Copy: Michael Peoples, Town Manager
NCDEHNR Central Files
File
attachments

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0006033 DISCHARGE NO. 001 . MONTH: November YEAR: 2000
FACILITY NAME: Eagle Road WWTP CLASS: III COUNTY: GASTON
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: Thomas J. Shvtle, Jr. GRADE: IV
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES: 1) Shealy Environmental Services 2) Eagle Rd. VYWTP 3) ETT Env.
CHECK IF ORC HAS CHANGED Q STAFtr:. X OTHER:
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: Da
ATTN: NC Div. Water Quality SIG E OF C)_94UNWIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT
1617 Mail Service Canter ..THIS REPORT IS ACCURATE AND'COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 MY KNOWLEDGE. PHONE: [phone]
50050
00010
00400
60060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00606
'00063
00665
32730
00095
TGP31
N
> o
m
E
p~
m
E`+;
oc
m0
O
W
U
U
O
m
LL_
w
aEi
~
mom.
mU
CQN
•p
m
c ai
E-
Cz
mm
om
~
`N
d-
�.m
ri
`u)' x
p0"
c
m.
H
c
m
.. ....
a°-
U
rn
Oc
12
a
r
a:;
_
�
U-:
C.W
m
U
Hrs
Hre
YIN
MGD
°C
Units
ugiL
mWL
mglL
mg1L
#1100mL
Mi L
mgtL
. Ib/D
ADMI
mg1L•
mgiL
umhos
PIF
:0 69
f28 0,
9600]
4 6
.752
2
700
8
y
0.94
17.2
6.56
100
10
016
' 25.0
2800
4. JL.
859
31
700
-8
20
T20`
23_'
0 i3
33,0
1'1 00
4 3
r 783
4
700
4
n
0.53
-
6
700
4-
f
8
700
8
. y.
0.60
9.7
6.57
.100.
7.3J
' 0 82
37.gr'
. 500g
5.3..
751
6 44
180,;
00
2 30
1 0>t
,>6p0"0
6.5
2p:0
58 4
92 6'
8
Tao
:8".
y:
0.92•
14'j
6.34'
380
5
210
' A,10.,
;1020
:4.5
869
,1.10
10
700
4
n.
0.96,4!,
4
n,0i3
12
700
4
n
0.50
6.02
S 6
, 0:49
=2710
<?
5,41
f.
a
903
14
700
8
y
0.85
13.7
6.66
100
9.6
0.49
36.0
18
5.2
24.0
170
2.2
794
y
0 85
'14 9
6 74
100
, 18
0:57,50;D
>6080
_,
62
16
700
8
y
1.42
16.9
6.69
100
.17..
.047
e69:Oa
?6q00..,
_5.4
807
17
;; 700
8
y :;
.0 97
45 3
639
150'
= 27
U51
33:0
240
50
=
822
/8
700
4
n
0.59
-
1977777
_.
-
20
700
8
y
0.48
11 A...6.28
260-
-If
0.461
45 f
3090 -
6.0
782
Z1
700
8
y.
;:1 13
.9a) 8
6.42
120„
B{
63
�9 D
2120'0
58
162
15ti-
2 6
:782
22
700
8
y
1.83
11.4
7.07
110
31
0.47
=Q
321Z00
_ 6.8
228
_
;
24
700
.4
n
0.561
0 41
28
700
4
n
0.391-
7..';700
: >.$
y`
.0.52
10.3
:6;63
110.-18',
0.68
547
io
28
700
8
y
0.97
12.3
6.83
130
20
1.10
18.0
<2
5.5
15.5
130
2.4
599
Y
'1 11
:15.1 `6.11
150'
: 22 :0:62
_..
310,
, .
1240
`6::1
673
30
700
8
y
1.01
17.3
6.30
180
/15
0.34
30.0
<2
5.9
748
AVERAGE
0.77
14
162
�7. "
0.8
C 2..
7108
5.4
18.9
129
92.6
2.50
0.000
745
MAXIMUM-, ..
1.83'
:A7
7.07
380=
>100
2:3
90.0::628Q0-
.6.8
24.0
170`
92.6
' 2,15
< 0 02
'MINIMUM
0.33
02
100
5.6
0.34
18.0
< 2
4A
15.5
58
92.6
2.2
< 0.02
228
�9111D(C)lGrab(G):... ..
if-a'
G
G :,
' C ::
'CG
C
;C
C
G
G
CMonthly
Limit
4.00
-9
10 1
4.0 1
30' 1
200.0 1
1
1
1
P/F

FaCRIK7 Status: Q please chO6k one off the ff0916wing D
A91 Mongtoringl data and samplings ffQeguenCies meet perrmit eeguireMOnts
Qcomplian$D
A09 monitoring daft and do NOT Mott perurroit reguilrements
imoncompllantD .
ff the facility is noncompiant, please comment our Comctive actions being taken in Tepect
to equipment, opePations, maintenance, etc., and a time table for improvements to be Made
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachment were prepared under my direction
or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather
and information submitted. based, on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those personsAlr®ctly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted .is,
to the best of my knowledge and. belief, true, accurate, and complete,) am aware that there are
significant penalties, for submitting false. information, including the possibility of. fines and .
imprisonment'for knowing violation
Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Signature'of P.ermittee** Date
ADDRESS: 155 North Maid Street
Cramerton NC 28032
Permit Expiration Date: January 31 2010 :
Town of Cramerton, Wastewater Trestrnent Department, MODIFIED,- MR-1 i Revised 8/00
Q

■�IIB111111111111111111111l11111111
1
CD
<
Z
LU
0
�I
IYIIIIIIIIIIIINYIIIIIIIII�IIINI
w
Iviol
Cl
w
���INIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
LLJ
-q_l
-
���1�1111111111■111111111111111111�1
��
IIAAA0111�W��11�0�11119��A1
�10000
o000AA�B�99ABAB009AA90600
..

4 �

APbES -NO: NC 0006033 DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: November YEAR:
FACILITY NAME: Eagle Raad, WWTP COUNTY: Gaston
UPSTREAM: S. Fork, Catawba River DOWNSTREAM: S. Fork, Catawba Ri
LOCATION: Cramerton Bridge LOCATION: Armstrong Bridge
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM!
■�O�E���
, ,
��
�0�®mom
: , ,
��
UMMENINNINNINNI
MINE
UMIMIMEMINNEM
■
a
/
1 1
..
m
■
M-INNIENION
MAX.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
= o�oF wArF9p�
olvilll:�-"c
174
Mr. Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton/ Eagle Road WTTP
155 North Main St.
Cramerton, NC 28032
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 19, 2006
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
_
D�c21200t
SUBJECT: Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Renewal
,-
Dear Mr. Shytle:
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, in accordance with the provisions of NC GS
143-215-.3 (a) (10), 15 NCAC 2H .0800, is pleased to renew certification for your laboratory to perform
specified environmental analyses required by EMC monitoring and reporting regulations 15 NCAC 2B
.0500, 2H .0900 and 2L .0100, .0200, .0300, and 2N .0100 through .0800.
Enclosed for your use is a certificate describing the requirements and limits of your certification. Please
review this certificate to insure that your laboratory is certified for all parameters required to properly meet
your certification needs.
Please contact your assigned inspector Chet Whiting at [phone], if you have questions or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Pat Donnelly
Branch Manager
Enclosure
cc: Chet Whiting
Mooresville Regional Office
o c hCarolina
NNaturally
Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.dwrllab.or5 Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Certificate No. 174
a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
In accordance with the provisions ofN.C.G.S. 143-215.3 (a) (1), 143-215.3 (a)(10) and NCAC 2H.0800:
•JJiJJ!l�� MrSr 70
,� .. ACV -
to
` �. Egsr QLtAM vtipti.��G
TOWN OF CRAMERTON/ EAGLE ROAD WTTP
is hereby certified to perform environmental analysis as listed on Attachment I and report monitoring data to DWQ for
compliance with NPDES effluent, surface water, groundwater, and pretreatment regulations.
By reference 15A NCAC 2H .0800 is made apart of this certificate.
This certificate does not guarantee validity of data generated, but indicates the methodology, equipment, quality control procedures,
records, and proficiency of the laboratory have been examined and found to be acceptable.
This certificate shall be valid until December31, 2007
Pat Donnelly

Attachment
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification
Certified Parameters Listing
.ab Name: Town of Cramerton/ Eagle Road V TTP Certificate Number: 174
Nddress: 155 North Main St. Effective Date: 01/01/2007
Cramerton, NC 28032 Expiration Date: 12/31/2007
Date of Last Amendment:
he above named laboratory, having duly met the requirements of 15A NCAC 21-1.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below.
CERTIFIED PARAMETERS
NORGANICS
ALKALINITY
Std Method 2320B
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
Sid Method 4500 CI G
:;OLIFORM FECAL
Sid Method 9222D (MF)
CONDUCTIVITY
Std Method 2510E
4MMONIA NITROGEN
Sid Method 450.0 NH3 F
pH
Sid Method 4500 H B
RESIDUE SUSPENDED
Std Method 2540D
TEMPERATURE
Sid Method 2550B
VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION
Option 1: Reduction in Volatile Solids
Option 3: Additional Digestion of Sludge
This certification requires maintance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved methodology, and satisfactory performance on evaluation samples. Lal;oratories are
subject to civil penalties and/or decertification for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 21-1.0807.

�0` G
c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 2, 2006
Mr.. Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton/Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Peoples:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on September 28, 2006, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please
inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the
enclosed report to him.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure:
cc: . Gaston County Health Department
WB
No°C hCarolina
NCDENR Naturally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone 704=663-1699 Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
E P q Washington, D.C. 20460
/`1
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I N1 2 1 51 31 N00006033 111 121 06/09/28 117 181 r1 191 GI 20I I
LJ U 1=
Remarks
21IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 CIA —------------ —----------- Reserved-------------------
67 I 1.5 169 701 3 I 711 N 721 N I 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I I 180
IJ I_I_I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Eagle Road WWTP
09:44 AM 06/09/28
05/06/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
599 Eagle Rd
Cramerton NC 28032
12:50 PM 06/09/28
10/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Rep resentative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Hubert Harold Hampton//704-825-7499 /
Thomas 7 Shytle/ORC/704-825-7499/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Michael C Peoples,155 N. Main St Cramerton NC 28032/Town Contacted
Manager/704-825-7499/7048259049 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules
Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
//►►
Wesley N Bell o f, MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.231/
Signature of Management Q A.R r�� Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
04:'
Marcia Allocco MRO WQ//704-235-2204/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (cont.) 1
3I N00006033 I11 12I 06/09/28 117 18' M1I
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
RECORD KEEPING SECTION cont'd:
DMRs were reviewed for the period August 05 through July 06. No limit violations were reported. No
effluent fecal coliform was reported on 12/30/05 and no effluent conductivities were reported on 6/8/06 and
6/9/06. Amended DMRs should be submitted if the above -noted discrepancies were transcription errors.
The facility staff must ensure that the DMRs during the summer season (April - October) document
whether or not a plume was observed around the outfall pipe while performing the instream sampling
events. In addition, the facility staff must ensure the analytical results are reported down to the appropriate
meter/method detection limits and all ORC/Backup ORC visitations are appropriately documented on future
DMRs.,
Overall, the facility staff incorporate a commendable record keeping system.
Page # 2

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road VWVrP
Inspection Date: 09/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
Comment:
Compliance Schedules
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is there a compliance schedule for this facility?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility compliant with the permit and conditions for the review period?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The City is curently under the compliance schedule of EMC SOC WQ
S05-010. The SOC became effective on 11/18/05 and requires the City to complete the
construction upgrades by.1/31/07 and achieve compliance with effluent limits (total
phosphorus and total residual chlorine) by 4/1/07.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
'NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
®❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
110
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
_❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5.MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
.❑
Cl
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 3

Permit: NC0006033
Inspection Date: 09/28/2006
Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WVVfP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes NO NA N
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: See "Summary" Section for additional comments.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
Cl
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +1- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The on -site laboratory (Certification #174) provides analytical support. The
facility upgrades will inlct.lde the construction of a new laboratory building. Please refer
to Mr. Chet Whiting's (Division's Laboratory Certification Unit) inspection report
regarding the facility's on -site laboratory practices.
r.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
y
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
®❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
®❑
Cl
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The facility is currently collecting time -based composite samples. The
facility will be capable of collecting flow proportional composite samples following
completion of the ongoing upgrades. The sampler's tubing should be cleaned/replaced
within the near future.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 4

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 09/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes
No NA NE
Comment: The sampler's tubing should be cleaned/replaced within the near future.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes
No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■
Cl ❑ ❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes
No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■
❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility appeared to be well maintained and properly operated. The
upgrades will include the installation of backup power and the construction of a
chemical feed/storage building (phosphurs removal and chlorination/dechlorination).
This office commends the efforts of the ORC and Backup ORC during the ongoing
upgrades at the treatment facility.
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
■
b. Mechanical
❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
❑
01111
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
❑
❑
❑ .
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: The current upgrades will include the installation of a new mechanical
screen.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
.
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
Cl
❑
■
❑ -
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Page # 5

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 09/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The upgrades will include the addition of six 75-hp aerators.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
0
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
.00
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
®❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately '/< of the sidewall depth)
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The facility is currently utilizing one of two secondary clarifiers. Both
secondaries will be upgraded as part of the construction activities. The upgrades to the
operational secondary clarifier have been completed.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are pumps operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: The upgrades will include replacement of the RAS and WAS pumps. The
new RAS pumps are currently in operation.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
. ❑
❑
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
0
■
[l
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑
■
❑
Page # 6

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 09/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA NE
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: The facility currently utilizes one 1400 lb. chlorine cylinder with two 150 lb.
cylinders as backups. The upgrades will include modifications to the existing chlorine
contact chamber and the installation of a dechlorination system with diffused air post
aeration. The facility will also convert to sodium hypochlorite (liquid) as the disinfectant.
.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The flow meter is calibrated twice per year. The flow meter was last
calibrated on 7/20/06 by Ken Nash Company, Inc.
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Cl ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The effluent appeared brownish red (tea color) with no foam. Aquatic life
(fish) was observed in the effluent discharge.
Page # 7

CRAMERTOM
SEP 2 9 200.
y6'9-14V Cwao`�'t►�''
PUBLIC WORKS / UTILITIES
155 North
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNR / DWQ
Mooresville Regional Office
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Cramerton
September 27, 2006
SUBJECT: Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
SOC / EMC No. WQ S05 - 010
Noncompliance with effluent BOD-5 discharge limit
The Eagle Road WWTP failed to meet monthly and weekly effluent discharge limits for BOD-5 during
the month of August 2006. I have attached a copy of our August DMR for your review.
JAZ
The data indicates high effluent BOD 5 values for August 9, 10, 15, and 1701. I have reviewed our
operations logs, laboratory data, and other field parameters and can find no correlations with other
parameters that may have attributed to the high BOD-5. Generally, a higher than normal effluent BOD-5
value can be associated with process equipment failures and/or poor biosolids management practices.
As you are aware our facility is currently involved in an upgrade. One component of the upgrade includes
retrofitting the two secondary clarifiers, replacement of the RAS/WAS pumps, and associated
appurtances. During the month of August we were asked to remove clarifier No. 1 from service so that the
work could begin. This was approved because one clarifier is large enough to maintain sufficient weir
overflow and surface loading criteria at our current daily flow rates. I do not feel that the construction
process has lead to, or caused any harmful effects on our operations to date.
During the summer our WWTP experiences higher than normal influent temperatures, (avg.31c),
resulting from industrial wastewater discharges. The higher temperatures lead to increased biochemical
activity in the activated sludge process. _ Without sufficient influent carbon the biomass begins
endogenous respiration which results in a decline of the MLVSS.
Each summer we augment our influent wastestream flow with waste syrup from Choice Bottling
Company and domestic septage from area haulers. The only draw back to this practice is inconsistency

r: �
- .
.... �
�:

with the concentrations of available carbon from one load to the next. Typically this causes no operational
difficulties because of the size of our aeration basin, (5.Omg cap.), and the associated mean cell residence
times.
I can only conclude that periodically we may receive a load of waste syrup or septage that contains a non -
soluble fraction of carbonaceous material that would require more time to metabolize than our facilities
can provide. This may lead to a pass through and show up as a high effluent BOD-5.
We have curtailed any waste syrup usage and restricted domestic septage until such time as we can
determine the exact cause(s) of the BOD-5 problem.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call or email me at:
704-825-7499 tocwwt@.bellsouth.net
Thank you
Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton, POTW Director
Copy: Michael Peoples, Town Manager
NCDEHNR Central Files
File
attachments

NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0006033 DISCHARGE
FACILITY NAME: Eagle Road WWTP
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: Thoma
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES: 1) Shealy Enyiron
CHECK IF ORC HAS CHANGED
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: NC Div. Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center'
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
EFFLUENT
NO. 001 MONTH: August
YEAR: 2006
CLASS: III
COUNTY:
GASTON
I. Shytle, Jr.
GRADE:
IV
kntal Services In
2) Eagle Rd. WWTP 3) ETT Env.
SA LE
PO ITAFF:
X OTHER:
Date vggG
SIGNA OF OR
Y THIS SIG
E, I CERTIFY THAT
THIS REPORT IS
CURATE AND -COMPLETE
TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLED
PHONE: [phone]
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00630
31616
00300
00600
00606
000M
00965
32730
00095
TOM
W
H
0
? o
Q`�CD
` N
O
E
g' H
0----
E
1-w
r co
m0
O
LLJ
Z
O
U
O..
2
o:
.3 .'
O
u
w-
Iu
`-
a)
aEi.
F-
: _ '.
G.
�c
'C �
w O
�0
L)
o
N
N
p
°°
cm
O tm
E O`
QZ
c
��
� ;8
N
6IY
F
€ c
,o�
O �
0-
a�i.
ud. C7
��
O)
y �•
aO':
w
o
Z
m
H
aa)
o
' Z
°
O
O
U
rn
f0
O. Q
F-s
g.
c
a7
ii
Z
O.
o
U
_
U
Hm
Hm
YIN
MGD
°C
Unite
ug1L
mg1L
mg1L
mg/L
1t1100mL
mg/L
mg11-
IbID
ADMI
I m91L
mg1L
umhos
PIF
1l
700
8..
y".
f.18
25,4
7.29
356
<2
"5 90
5 6`
` `<2 :
' ,5:5
;14.0
138;
:83.2`
2
700
8
y
1.13
26.7
7.19
400
<2
4.50
'6.0
2
4.8
984
3
700'
'. 8
y
1 17
;27.2
7.24
230;
<2
4:30,
4.2
;: 9
4:8
4
700
8
y
1.41
27.9
7.22
250
2.3
4.40
6.2
14
4.8
5
700
4'
n
166
-
6
700
4 .
• n:
0.78
-
E�4
0 60
234
=725
200-
3 8.
'4 6U
<2
71;0
8
700
71"
:2
128
45
12.4
124
2.50
971
9'
700
On
. _Y .:1
37.
26 5,;
,712
220
32
10
700
8
y
-.1.24
, 26:0
.; 7.06
.200
: 57.0
2..10.
5.7 ; .
• , <2 :.
• , 4.7 ..
;.
1028 .
.
111
700
8
y, .
-1 57�
26 2
,698
2]0
6 4
44`
W
.
�t.
12
700
4
n
().36.
4
0
0 80
a
x
f
; c_� 1;
T
14
700 1
8
1 y
0.64
22.5
6.96
320
14 .010.341
6.2
484001
5.5
808
15
' 706-
;. 8
y'
:1 32:
25 1 '
7.p0
260,
_
44 0
0.15
T6
�_...
8900
6.3 .
" 8:5
" 94 :
2 50 ;
'
863
16
700
8
y
1.60
25.4
7.09
...240
.21.0
0.251
22.0.
93400
5.4
843
17
.700
;:'8 '
:..y
1:49
26.6:
6:78
250:'50.0
",0.40
18
700
8
y
1.00
23.4
6.70
290
9.4
0.48
6.4
<2
5.4
1
834
20
700
4
n
0.42
-
21
. 700
'" - 8 ..y
=
0 71.
24 3
6:78
.350`
:. 3 7„
0.37
4:4
8300
5:3 ...
" :.
;
> 775-
22
700
8
y 11.251
25.6
6.64
210
3.9
0:37
. 8.0
1200
5.0
10.3
.107
3.00
845
23
aoa
.'8
y
'
6:01
890"
f2 7
0.`40
24
700
8
y
0.98
25.3
6.86
420
14.0
0.38'
7.2
'31200
` ' 4.0
811
25
'- 700
8
y;
.1 01
24.6
6:71
656
_10 0,
0:84
''S 5
<2
4 2
871
26
700
4
n
0.53
-
'27-
28
700
8
n
0.60
23.1
6.92
480
4.0
0.50
5.2
32100
5.1
803
29
`700
'.:'8. •
`y.
1.64
" 25:2
6.52
340' .
' 3:9.-
0.25
.31:0 ..'..
19`_. -.
`-,4.6
2.50
820
N
700
8
y
1.12
25.7
6.45
460
4.2
0.56
5.6
10
4.6
845
700'
8
y
1.0.5
25.4
729-
350
:10.,.
'5:5
-993:
AVERAGE
0.98
25
334
13.3
1.8 1
8.1
168
4.9
11.3
116
83.2
2.16
0.028
901
MAXIMUM
1.60
."28 '
7.29
890`.
57.0
5.9
:31.0
93400
-5:5
14.0
'136
83.2
3.0
0.028
1091
MINIMUM
0.36
23
6.01
110
<2
0.15
< 2
<2
4.0
8.5
94
83.2
0.3
0.028
775
Comp(c)1Gr*G) :.:
G
:G.,
G .
C.. •
C
C.. '
: G . •
G
-C
C .
C
C .
G
G :
C
Monthly Limit
4.00
6-9
10 .
4.0
30
200.0
P/F

FIacility Status: ( please check one of the following D
All monitoving data and sampling frequencies meet perunit requirements [�
lColr pliant)
A11 monitoring data and sampling frequencies do N07 meet permit requirements ❑ .
(Noncompliant)
If the facility is noncompiant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in repect
to equipment, operations, maintenance, etc., and a time table for improvements to be made
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachment were prepared under mj( direction
or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that .qualified personnel properly gather
and Information submitted. based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the, system, or .
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of.my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete, I am aware that -there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violation."
Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Signature of PermittW* Date
ADDRESS: 155 North Main Street
Cramerton NC 28032
Permit Expiration Date: January 31.2010
Town of Cramerton, Wastewater Treatment Department, MODIFIED, MR-1/ Revised 8/00

INFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO: NC 0006033 DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: August YEAR: 2006
FACILITY NAME: _TOWN OF CRAMERTON/ EAGLE ROAD WVffP COUNTY: GASTON
mmun
M181111111
Ulm
:11
1 •
°
o
:ol
-
:o/
-
le
/
•1
0

NPDES NO: NC 0006033 DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: August YEAR: 2006
FACILITY NAME: Eagle Road, WWTP COUNTY: Gaston
UPSTREAM: S. Fork, Catawba River DOWNSTREAM: S. Fork, Catawba River
LOCATION: Cramerton Bridge LOCATION: Armstrong Bridge
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
UJ a
Oav�X
_HRS-
1
2 8001
3
00010
00300
00400
00310
00083
31616
00095
00010
00300
00400
00310
00083
31616
00093
F
to
W
�-
W
0
0
0
a
N
G
m
cU
WL
.
u,
0
U
o
Z
U
w
aW
UU)O
w
WO
0
0
CL
CD
N
o
m
c
U�
_j
0
LO
ww0
O
0C9
oj
oo.
OO
_ PC_,
_mg/L..
-S.U._
_mglL_
_ADMI
#1100m1
um/Hos
_ _
HRS
°C-_
_ mg/L.
. S.U._
mg/L
ADMI
#1100ml
umlHos
--
47.6
142.2
.
26.4
6.4
7.39
1
271
8051
23.6
6.3
7.52
197
4
1015
28.0
6.0
7.70
213
1020
28.9
5.9
7.57
218
-
6
7
30`
271__ �
` 6 5
247. `:
935
.28.2
6.2;_
7, 64
;; .
,`.
' 223
8
9
t000
:27 2:;
.: 6 4.=
,-7 75
=--_
246. °
roo5
27`$
6:3
7:75'
:'`
231
10
11
1015
:;26 2
.. 6 5, -
241 .
,
".
1020
26;a.
6 4-_
7 63
%
.
225
12
13
14
1400
25.7
7.4
7.14
59
1405
25.1
7.3
7.28
58
15
16
1448
24.8
7.1
7.35
85
14531
24.7
7.0
7.29
86
17
18
915
27.7
7.3
7.56
111
920
23.4
7.1
7.45
103,
19
20
21
1450
>27 0
..6 8.
7 48
:,-
122 :::
:.'
1455
27.8'
121
22
23
1350
' 26
7
104
':
1355
25 2
1 Q1
24
25
1322
. 27 ::
6 8
'7 5
: 97
13z7
27.;:
6.6
7 5'
103
26
27
,
28
14361
27
6.7
7.7.
140
1441
28
6.6
7.6
146
29
30
1230
27
6.6
7.7
155
1235
27
6.6
7.5
160
31 .
AVG.
MAX.
MIN.
27
6.7 12a`-
48
161
26
6.6
4 x
42
152
28
7.4
7 9, `_
` ,
48 _
148
271
rr.
29 ".
7.3
7.8 °.
42-:
231 ,
25
6.0
7.1
59
23
5.9
7.3
42
58
I

December 8, 2005
Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main Street
fr Cramerton, NC 28032
�'/
SUBJECT: .Payment Acknowledgment
Civil Penalty Assessment
Eagle Road WWTP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number: LV-2005-0438
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Shytle:
for
iry
es
for
lity .
SOURCES
,.,,,AL OFFM ;
DEC 0 9 200'
TIM
This letter is to acknowledge. receipt of check number 002266 in the amount of $585.04 received
from you dated November 21, 2005. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment
levied against the subject facility, and this case has been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions; please call Robert L Sledge at 919-733-5083 Ext.547.
Sincerely,
Frances Candelaria
cc: Enforcement File #: LV-2005-0438
'cD`- M6o—fdsvi11--RegionaL-Office_Supervisor---�
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service 1 800 623-7748
NorthCarolina
AaftzrY llff

111002266i1' IM531016B4I: 001i7i526ii'

Postage $ / b `r Certified Fee fl( 5
Retum RecieptiredFee cp 1=
(Endorsement Requ) `c��_
Restricted rsDelivery Fee r
(Endorsement Required) _
i Tol MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN
MANAGER
3 sem TOWN OF CRAMERTON
UN 155 NORTH MAIN STREET
orF CRAMERTON NC 28032
c' swp/rmb 11/15/05

:erlified Mail Provides: (as�anaa)ZooZeun['ppgeuuo�s
I A mailing receipt
A unique identifier for your mailpiece
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
npontant Reminders:
i Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail
I Certified Mail is notavallable for any class of International mail.
i NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fc
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof e
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Retur
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover th
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver fo
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt i
required.
i For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee c
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailplece with th
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
i If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the art!
cleat the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Me
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
MPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
nternet access to delivery information is not available on mail
addressed to AM and Ms.

AJOLVA7.
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
November 14, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL .
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Peoples:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
7003 2260 00013492 7273
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Eagle Road WWTP
Case No. LV-2005-0438
Gaston County
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $585.04 ($500.00 civil penalty + $85.04 enforcement costs) against the Town of Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by the Town of Cramerton for the month of June
2005. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the discharge'limitations
found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The violations are summarized in Attachment A to
this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Cramerton:
Mooresville Regional Office 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NO e
Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone] / Internet: h2o,enr.state.nc.us 1,Car011na
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer/ Paper Nawrially

$ 0 For 0 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the. permit monthly average effluent
limit for Biochemical Oxyg_en Demand.
$ 500.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
3215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033,
by discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit weekly average effluent limit
for Biochemical Oxygen Demand.
$ 0 For 0 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into'the waters of the State in
violation of the permit daily minimum effluent limit
for pH.
$ 500.00
$ 85.04
$ 585.04
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) . The duration. and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:

1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be, aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for,contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penaltyassessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you -believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water -Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider

information that was not part of the original remission'request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an'Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission. Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality.
1617 Mail Service Center.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed - provided the original .and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings.within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601

Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related
to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction
activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. If you
have any questions about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent,
Please contact the Surface Water Protection Section staff of the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704/663-1699.
D. Rex GWason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
17TI:3

Attachment A
Town of Cramerton
Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Case Number LV-2.0057.043&
Limit Violations, June 2005
Monthly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit Units
Biochemical Oxygen Demand -10.8 10.0 mg/L
Weekly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit Units
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 44 * 15.0 mg/L
Daily Minimum Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit Units
pH 5.04 >6.0 <9.0 S.U.
* denotes assessment of civil penalty.

0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Gaston
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
Town of Cramerton
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
') ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
AND STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2005-0438
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $585.04 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated November 14, 2005, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of 2005
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2005-0438
Assessed Party: Town of Cramerton
Permit No. (if applicable): NC0006033 (Eagle Road WWTP)
County: Gaston
Amount Assessed: $585.04
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
" Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form to request
remission of this civil.penalty. You'should attach any documents that you believe support your
request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for remission.
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed
below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil'penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred
or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted
only when one or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factonthat you
believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting
documents, as to why the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully gpplied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are
listed in the civil penalty_ assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (Le.', explain the steps that you- took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i. e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from
performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:

EFFLUE
NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0006033 DISCHARGE N6. 001 MONTH: June YEAR: 2005
FACILITY NAME: Eagle Road, W.W.T.P. 7 CLASS: III COUNTY: GASTON
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: Thomas J. le Jr. GRADE IV
CERTIFIED LABORATORIEh(1) Sheal Environmenta ervices Inc. (2) Ea Ie Rd. WWTP (3) ETT Env.
CHECK IF ORC HAS CHANGED SAMPLES COLLECTED BY FACILITY STAFF: X Date 7, Zd -C)
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: ATTN: NC Div. Water Quality ATU THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT
1617 Mail Service Center THIS REP RT IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 MY KNOWLEDGE. PHONE: (704) 825-W
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00600
00665
32730
K�.
.5`°tit
TG13313
O
CD
CD
w
Nm
C
m
at
C
N
Z
C
3
0
'
CJ
O 0)
COrj
O2
m
Z
Z
t
❑
co
LL
O_
E
L
O
Z
O
O(nx
7i
U
I--
0
•c
IZ.
'OT
Ua
N
000w
Q
LL
�w
F-
Lto
O
U
Hrs
Hrs
YIN
MGD
°C
Units
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
#/100ml-
mg/L
mg/L
Ib/D
ADMI
mglL
mg/L
umhos
' S,
Elf
!
1,
700
8`
y
1'{53
21 %
6 77
; 380
<;2
<tl;2'
9 2
4 F:-'
5 9!s
s
µ
Ai
2
700
8
y
2.15
21
6.95
340
2.2
<0.2
9.2
< 2
6.0
95.7
870
mA
1::77IL
:340 02:4
<.0'.2
4
700
4
n
1.04
-
-70
6
7ao
8
y
0.61
22
7.15
270
< 2
<0.2
4.8
< 2
5.7
1110
7,
:700
8;
y
1;57
21
6 99
180
3 b
<0 2
' `6 0
84
5 9
11.4
"•149
U
2,0
933 ;
s
8
700
8
y
1.55
24
7.01
370
< 2
<0.2
6.4 _
4
5.2
1000
9
".700
8
y
1:90
25„
7 01
0
<: 2
<0 2.:
10
700
8
y
1.611
25
7.04
240
< 2
<0.2
6.4
510
5.4
950
12
700
41.
n
0.45.
-
13
400
tp
14
700
8
y
1.34
24
6.72
320
< 2
<0.2
5.2
< 2
4.8
12.4
139
1.8
855
15
;�o0
8:
`y
120
24';
6 82
320
2
<0 2
' 7 2
` 4•
' ;
850
u
x
;." s__;
44,;:.
;
44
p
16
700 1
8
y
1.21
24
6.83
360
< 2
<0.2
4.8
< 2
4.8
910
.4-
1 8
700-
4
y
0.60
-
19
ao
4'
y
0:41
:7
20
700
8
y
0.67
22
6.94
510
< 2
<0.2
4.4
< 2
5.0
990
21
'ia0
8,,
Y
1 49
22
6940
;
22
700
8
y
1.12
23
6.82
5501
< 2
<0.2
8.0
< 2
5.6
965
6 13
=200
>1:1.0
<0 2
, 9 2 ,
;; . 42
1.4:
f05U:,
24
700
8
y
1.30
24.1
5.04
360,>110
<0:2
28.4
<2
1.5
1170
25
'700
4 ;
n-
Q:55
7
26
700
4
n
0.52
_
27
:rzao
8 ;
y
068
24 ;'
7 23
540
6A,
,
28
700 1
8
y
1.43
24
7.17
340
2.3
<0.2
8.8
10
4.6
5.4
64
0.97
910
29
7o0
7 07
51Q
2 t2
<0 2'
E 6 4
30
700
8
y
1.21
24
6.94
5401
< 2
<0.21
6.0 1
< 2
5.0
960
31
AVERAGE
1.12
23
3661
10.8,
0.0
7.9
3
4.9
10.9
132
95.7
1-64
0.00
960
MAXIMUM
550
< 0 2 ',
�28 4
510 ;:
• ,6 0::;.
14 2.
:176
95.7
2 Q`
< 0 Q2
1170<
III'
MINIMUM
0 40
21
5.04
180
< 2
< 0.2
4.4
< 2
1.4
5.4
64
95.7
1.0
< 0.021
850
Comp.(C)/Grab(G)
"G
-
'C
C `.
G.
.'
.0
G
Monthly Limit
4.00
6-9
10
4.0
30
200.0
PIF

Facility Status: ( please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements EJ
(Compliant)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements QX .
(Noncompliant)
If the facility is noncompiant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in repect
to equipment, operations, maintenance, etc., and a time table for improvements to be made
See attached letter
TSS REMOVAL 95 %
BOD REMOVAL 88%
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachment were prepared under my direction
or.supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather
and information submitted. based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of my knowledge and Belief, true, accurate, and -complete, I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and.
imprisonment for knowing violation."
Michael C. Peoples, Town Manager
`': Permittee .
g/1 U
Signature 8 f PermitteelF Date
ADDRESS: 155 North Main Street
Cramerton NC 28032
Permit. Expiration Date: January31, 2005
Town of Cramerton, Wastewater Treatment Department, MODIFIED, MR-1/ Revised 8/00

July 27, 2005
W D. Rex C
Regional W61
NCDENR',
610 East Ceri
Dear R
I have,
weekly
As besi
A
by
P.E.
Street, Suite 30
the
6/20
yS ti"Servic(;s*',*,,:,,.,.."';aspA . A 11 of our
were developed "cooperat
Gaurene Rhynez P E ;;:and our staff to
i was too
gh for our biomass to mel
We have 6:.: restncted the-hailling to domestic se t"
p,age
temperatureslegin "* tosubside* late auRust. Cattei
, in
with ' I par4met rs f Ouly 2005 If you :have question's.,T)Iease call me at-70478257, 4
that time.
in
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

Permit NC000603:
A. (I.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING RE<3UIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified
below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING RE9UIREMENTS
Monthly:
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Flow
4.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Effluent or Influent
BOD, 5-day, 20°C 2
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent & Influent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent & Influent
Phenols
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
NH3 as N
4.0 mg/L
3
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total RQsidual Chlorine
28 p g/L4
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pHs
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2+NO3+TKN)6
No Limit (mg/L)
No Limit (pounds/month)
Annual Limit: 103,282 pounds/year6
Weekly
Monthly
Annually
Composite
Calculated
Calculated
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
1.0 mg/L4
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity?
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Color8
I
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Dissolved Oxygen
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Conductivity
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Color (Summer)'
Monthly
Grab
U, D
Notes:
1. U: Upstream at Cramerton Bridge. D: Downstream at Upper Armstrong Bridge.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. Ammonia weekly average limit to be developed at.a later date; refer to Special Condition A (5).
4. Effluent limits for TRC and TP become effective January 1, 2005 based on the .projected construction
completion date. However, monitoring requirements become effective -on the permit effective date.
5. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
6. Refer to Special Condition A (4) for Total Nitrogen Loading Calculations.
7. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 4.7%; March, June, September and December (see Special Condition A'(2)).
8. Refer to Special Condition A (3) for Color Monitoring Requirements.
9. Upstream/downstream samples shall be collected 3/Week (June -September) and 1/Week (October -May).
(Summer) = April 1- October 31
(Winter) = November 1 - March 31
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or
visible foam in other than trace amounts.-
_

11 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
I Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
I Attach this card to the back of the mallplece,
'or on the front if space permits.
I. Article Addressed to:
MR MICHAEL PEOPLE&, TOWN
-t MANAGER.
TOWNOF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/rmb 11/15/05
� Agent Xjo E3 Addresse
B. R ceiv.vjb'y-Pr1ntqqdN 'C. D' to of Deliver
ux 4
D. Is'delivery address difft from item 1 ? 0 Yes
If YES, enter deliveryd ess below: 11 No
�eServic
e Type
Certified Mail 13 Express Mall
El Registered El Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 11 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7003 2"2 6 01 0 0 D .3492 7 1"
).q;:nrrriqR11
4n0909-0-KA-i-

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVIC`E`�"
Postage & Fees Paid
P m, Fbst
o U PS
S S Permit
Permit No: G-10
o Sender: Please arne print yrou"r-Jri address, and ZlP44`ih
' jr
NCDENR
SURFACE -WATERT-ROTECT119F
I
610 EAST-G ENTER AVE
SUITE 301
i=MOORESVILLE N-C 281.15
I it Id, 111ril I lift[

' Postage $
Certified Fee r3 t
3 Retum Redept Fee �\
(Endorsement Required) �4Q� M 0
3 Restricted Delivery Fee
0 (Endorsement Required)
cai��1Y T r
i
To° MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, 1�
3 sent TOWN OF CRAMEMR
-sve7 155 NORTH MAIN STREET -------------
or A CRAMERTON NC 28032
-------------
City% swp/rtnb 11/16/OS

;ertified (Nail Provides: (as�enea)zoozeunr'oose�odS
I Amailing receipt
I A unique identifier for your mailpiece
I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
nportant Reminders:
I Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail
I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
i NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fc
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
I For an additional fee, a Retum Receipt may be requested to provide proof e
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Retur
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover th
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver fo
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt i
required.
I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee c
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mallpiece with th
endorsement "RestrictedDelivery°.
i If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the artl
cle at the post office for postmarking. if a postmark on the Certified Me
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
MPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
nternet access to delivery information is not available on mail
addressed to APOs and Ms.

ANA
NCDENR..
North Carolina.. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality .
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
November 16, 2005 Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Peoples,. Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155' North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
7003 2260 00013492 7303
Subject: Notice, of Violation -Effluent Limitations
Tracking #: NOV-2005-LV-0528
Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Peoples:
A review of the July 2005 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of
the following parameter:
Pine Parameter Reported Value Limit
001 pH 5.91 s.u. >6.0 - <9.0 s.u. FIN
On the back side of DWQ Form MR-1, the Facility Status was erroneously listed as.Compliant;
this is also a violation, subject to an enforcement. action. Remedial actions, if not already implemented,
should be taken to correct"any problems: The Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions
for these and any additional violations.
If you have questions_ concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Richard
Bridgeman or me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
RMB
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 On�e�1
Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr,state.mus - NOl hCarofina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 750% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper - ;Vaturallb,

0 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
I Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to -you.
I Attach this card to the back of the mailpiecej
or on the front if space permits.
I. Article Addressed to:
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN'MGR:'',_,.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
xRTON NC 28032
-wp/Irrnb 11/16/05
A. SibA t XNa � kej�&qk� El Agent
[I Addresse
B. R elved by, t Pubta f Name) I C. Date of Deliver
D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ? 11 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 13 No
Service Type
I Certified Mail, 13 Express Mail
11 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandisi
[] Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 11 Yes
..... .. ....
70;09-'E260:400*b1 3492;• 7303

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE -
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-TO
• Sender: Please print your name, address,,,and ZIP+4 in this box'
a.
NCDENR •. _.102
SURFACE�WATER PROTECTION
610 EAST-GEMAVE C'
SUITE 301' �`�' C
MOORESVILLS' NC 28115
.r Ulr� I,Il,ll,,l�„,il,I11111,IIIIIII,I,I,I,I'll "11111IIIIIIIIIIIJ

Michael F. Easley, Governor
�V v. William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan-W el(limek,'.P.`EyDiiecto��
Division of,VUater Qu MIL
CSitl:Je�eov✓t) 1_ `•'.•.lii :;'th. 1' ICE
Date: November 9, 2005
Craig D. Choquet NOV 1 0 200')
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report NC0006033
ECYati.
Dear Permittee. - - -
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
into the Division's database. Our data entry staff has informed me of problems with your recent DMR
submittal. Until these problems have been corrected, your DMR will be considered incomplete. Please
see the attached form along with a copy of the problem DMR for details regarding the DMR's deficiency.
Incomplete or illegible DMRs affect our staff's ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation of DMR
submittals. Please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with your NPDES permit and 15A NCAC 02B .0506,and you may be subject to further
enforcement action. Please take the.necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
Attention: Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1611 Mail Service Center .
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs, please contact Michele Phillips at 919-733-5083 Ext. 534. Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: s�VlootesilleRegionaLOff ce
Central Files
NorthCarolina
oVatur'a!!y
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Phone: [phone] Customer Service
Internet: httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/AHirmative Action Employer

of WArFR
% QG
-
Jamie Shytle .
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G.. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 19, 2005
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment
Civil Penalty Assessment
Eagle Road WWTP
Permit Number: NC0006033
Case Number: LV-2003-0578
Gaston County
Dear Ms. Shytle:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
L�LOW[
SEP
NC DEN R MRO
DWQ - A uifer. Protection
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of check number 24086 in the amount of $335.04 received
from you dated September 14, 2005. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment
levied against the subject facility, and this case has-been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert L Sledge at 919-733-5083 Ext.547.
Sincerely,
Frances Candelaria
cc: Enforcement File #: LV-2003-0578
rDWQ MO-Oresville-_Regional-:Office=Supervisor
( Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service 1 800 623-7748
oe NCarolina
Natura!!y

Postage
$
0
U Certified Fee
Q
Post
Return Receipt Fee
2j
t (Endorsement Required)
7
U Restricted Delivery Fee
� (Endorsement Required)
MR M. DAVID YOUNG, TOWN GERV ��
rn TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
wq/rmb 8/27/03

Certified Mail Provides:
■ A mailing receipt
■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece
■ A signature upon delivery
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
Important Reminders.
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
• Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
s NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please..consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee, 'a"Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof o
delivery. To -obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt' PS For .3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover thf
fee. Endorse m ql .i0.re `Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver to
a duplicate retuR, 6c ip , a LISPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
requ!reti. ,.,,l
■ For am additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee% authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with tht
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti
cle at the post office for postmarking. if a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. -
PS Form 3800, January 2001 (Reverse) 102595-01-M-104!

Vd A
Michael F. Easl,-. Govano:
,_ Nz=:� `C
August 27, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. M. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Young:
William G. Ross Jr„ secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Narural Resour res
Alan W: Klimek, F. E„ Director
Division ofWater.Qualiry
Coleen H. Sullins Deputy Director
Division of Wata Quality
7001 2510 0004 8287 6289
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and -Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations ofN.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Town of Cramerton Eagle.Road WWTP
Case No. LV-2003-0578 .. _ ......
Gaston County
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of
$585.04 ($500.00 civil penalty + $85.04 enforcement costs) against the Town of Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has-been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by the Town of Cramerton for the month of May
2003. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the discharge limitations
found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The violations are summarized in Attachment A to this
letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and.North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions. of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment against
the Town of Cramerton:
Mooresville Regional Olfitx, 919 North Main Streit, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

$ 500.00 For 1 of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
.violation of the permit weekly average effluent limit
for Biochemical Oxygen Demand.
$ 500.00
$ 85.04
$ 585.04
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree. and extent of.harm _to the natural resources of the State, to the public.
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally,
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina .27699-1617

2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
. such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted, and
submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting -from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(S) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response.will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions
(Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information
that was not part of the original remission request considered by the Director.
Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement
in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality also
requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for Remission
Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is, considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of
the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition
may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the document is received in
the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the
faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings .
is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Mr. Dan. Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after the
review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems. and you anticipate remedial construction activities. then
oY u may wish to consider applyin for oraS,pecial Order by Consent. If you have = questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.

(Dat�)
/-?, a, kt --, ,
D. Rex 61 ason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

Attachment A
Town of Cramerton
Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Case Number LV-2003-0578
Limit Violations, May 2003
Monthly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit
Biochemical Oxygen.Demand .25.25 * _15.0
* denotes assessment of civil penalty.
Units
- mg2

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF Gaston
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
CIVIL PENALTIES. AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
AND STIPULATION OF FACTS
Town of Cramerton )
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 ) FILE NO. LV-2003-0578
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $585.04 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated August 27, 2003, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment
document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of
remission of this civil penalty must be-submittedto the. Director of the_ Division of Water Quality
within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of 2003
:•
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number. LV-2003-0578
Assessed Party: Town of Cramerton
Permit No. (if applicable): NC0006033
County: Gaston
Amount Assessed: $585.04
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form to request
remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe support your _
request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for remission.
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed
below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred
or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted
only when one or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you
believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting
documents, as to why the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.l(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are
listed in the civil penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental dan=e resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (L e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from
performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:

EFFLUENT
( I:=:5-S r-Kn4ii-N '. NC0005=i DISCHARGE NO. 001 MONTH: - Wiz%, YEAR: 2007. i
.ACILITY N.AIJ-: -aale RoaB, %f0 .--P. CLASS: III COUNT`': GASTON
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: Thomas J. Sh%,be. Jr. GRAD- IV
-r.TIFI-D !ABDRA T ORI-(1) Shealy-nvironmenta' Services Inc. ;1) - Sa (3) -nt•,
_
CHECf; IF ORC HAS CHANGED SAMPLES COLLECTEDL Sl'=ACi-ITY STAFF %�"7- Date I % : -
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY te: ATTN: NC Div. Water Quality ✓SIuI�AT O- O ✓$Y THIS SIGNATURE, I CEPTTH:,.-
1617 Mail Service Center THIS REPORT IS ACCU^nATE AND COMPILETE TO THE S ST 0=
Raleta . N-- 2769S-1617 h71' KNOWLEDGE. PHONE: (104) E25-7499
1500501000101004001500601003101006101
00530
1 --1Sir.00300
I00600
00600
00665I
32730I
I
I
I ITGP3B
I t=
>
m
W
a
cr
G
I ma
Npr
cr
_..
ti
a
'
-
o
OI
os
I:2
7c
O
O dN
1UN
0
pLu
�NCU
uX
.. !..•
Fi
II
I
U
Hrs
I Hrs
YIN
I MGD
I °C
I Unit
ug/L
I maF_
I moll-
I malL I#1100mLI
ma/L
maP
I Ih/D
ADMI
I ma/L
ma/L
umhos
I
1
I
I pry
1.
._700.:.
. 8 :
. n
2.OD
':24=..7
"17
-430.
20
0.32
• ..7.'
-:: -2 '�
...
_
,. ....I.,
.
�A�A^
= -
2 1700
8.
1
I y'
1.39I
23
17.03I
500
1 2.0
10.251
8
I 2
I 5.7
I
I
I
1 1360
4 1 TO)
1 4
n
10.75-
5
;28
�
'x ys'
_
ti
�1340
y
_�� .
_ •_�_
- I
16 I -,00
I 8-
1 y
11.51
I 22
17.051
74D
12.3
10.241
1.5 I 2
6.0
150.4
635
1168.81
2.2
0.02
1 1330
I , ��
�
� ""I!�n?r
-
1;72
_2-.7:06
r59U:
-
-
°-
£ 1 700
18
1 y
11.52
I 23
17.031670
2.0
10.321
12
1 2
5.0
I
I
I
I
121 D
9 q:.,,8:
<
.I
:.y'.
54
:,24;<
. ...
Z:1�.
_.
'420.-
-- -
:.2;•
023;
-
.:. .......
,,.:10 ' •I-•
. 2
5�
-
s- -
Y
- - .1I
-•��
J - -I--
124D
-
. .,I�,;:�-"I
110 I : 00
I 4
n
11.051
1 �
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
11
.. ..
- aw
. __ -
_
_ I
121
700
1 8
1 n
10.701
23
17.041
680
12.0
10.40
9
I 2
1 5.0
I
I
1120D
_13
70a;
B�.n
�+D9
22
7.D0
7202-,0_
�47
�=1�!
6
�
.:�
"'-�.a:.
1141
700
1 8
1 n
11.351
23
17.151
760
12.2
1 1.5
1 10
: _21;:.
1 2
-'-��'.'��
1 5.5
1
,aD6_
1
.:,
.2.3 •.,"
:,.'1]5D.:?`
1200
I
.
I
;.:,
1
,700:
8
n�
�-33�
22
�_'18
>4D0;
1D:0�
23�
=2
__52
�'
927,0�
':_
1-:]5
V
•,_12
-- '
-:>-;
a =
y _
161 700
I^ 8
I n
11. i
I 20
17.20
1770
18.0
1 3.2
I 14
1 2
5.0
Ly
I
I
I
1320
1
I
1
'L7:
SaovT
'
n
0 T8:
,
:.I
f
IlkN��
:)
,
r
_
�I
181 7D0
4...1
n
0.671
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
-
_s9:
:Dn_158
1'0
K "-
is4
36
;<
>;
Iz0I ,DD
1 Y
11.36I
21 Ih-.3
499D0
I .91 I
4.01
I 1121
I
1
I 75.70 I13.51
1.5I
1.4
1200
" _ �_,•
122 17 oD 1
8
1 y 12.291
22 17
39 1200
1 6.8 11.2
1 14 1
525
1 6.7 I
I
I
(
1101)
I
I
1
km
ry
1241
700 1
4
1 n 11.26I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
j 261 TOO 1
8
1 n 10.521
I
I
,y •
1.02:
,::2D =11.
;7D
h0'-
4"I
,:;._;7-: =
: _.1._•,
7.,;::
U49-
28 700 18
1 y 11.751
21 17.091
341) (
42 1
3.6 1 12 1 1 I
5.4 I
I
I
I
I
I
624 I
,.,
I
I
1
-
..:,.._.._
.._ .._
:• :_ :.•-
; _ 04-
:28D
:27,..
2 6 , :,'10 ., � .-.�__ .
:: �:5 0
=
-:�°
1301 7D0 18
1
y 12.00
20 16.721
440 1
22 11
1.6 I 7 I 1 1
5.2 1
I
1
.:.:
I
_
I
I840
)AVERAGE1.34
I
22
545 1 8 5 11
r 1 111.0 I 2 1
5.63 121
12431166.611.5981
0.02 1
1123
IIYA:.1h1UM
3.58:
T24
739 790 1i2:D'
4.'I . 16.D ' °525
7:OU _68;8';
2-3'--
-A 02
w440
10.521
20 I6
00
,2I21 2.D 10.2
7.0 1 I5.00
I8.9
76 I168.8I
0.4° I
0.0-
1Comn.fC)IGrab(G)
G
, G G:; C •
`:G .
= :'C--'G`:-'
_
1Mo rtnly Limit 1
4.00 I
1' E-9 1 1 10 14.0
i 30 i 200.0 1
I I I
1
I I
1
1
P/r

June 16, 2003
3
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

Permit NC0006033
A! (.I.) EFFL ENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REgUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified
below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LINIITATIONS
MONITORING REgUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Locationl
Flow
4.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Effluent or Influent
BOD, 5-day, 200C 2
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent & Influent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent & Influent
Phenols
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
NH3 as N
4.0 mg/L
3
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
28 pgfL4
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Conductivi ty
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pHs
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2+NO3+TKN)s
No Limit (mg/L)
No Limit (pounds/month)
Annual Limit:103,282 poundslyears
Weekly
Monthly
Annually
Composite
Calculated
Calculated
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
1.0 mg1L4
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicitf
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Colors
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Fecal coliform
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Temperature
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Dissolved Oxygen
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Conductivity
3/Week9
Grab
U, D
Color (Summer)e
Monthly
Grab
U, D
Notes:
1: U: Upstream at Cramerton Bridge. D: Downstream at Upper Armstrong Bridge.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. Ammonia weekly average limit to be developed at a later date; refer to Special Condition A (5).
4. Effluent limits for TRC and TP become effective January 1, 2005 based'on the projected construction
completion date. However. monitoring requirements become effective on the permit effective date.
5. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
6. Refer to Special Condition A (4) for Total Nitrogen Loading Calculations.
7. Chronic Toxicity (Cerk daphnia) at 4.7%; March, June, September and December (see Special Condition A (2)).
8. Refer to Special. Condition A (3) for Color Monitoring Requirements.
9. Upstream/downstream samples shall be collected 3/Week (June -September) and 1/Week (October -May).
(Summer) = April 1- October 31
(Winter) = November 1 - March 31
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
--._item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Y Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
IN Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
MR M. DAVID YOUNG, TOWN MANAGER
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERT.ON NC 28032
wq/rtnb 8/27/03
70011; t 25110_;000�4; :82
'S Form�38�1111`.fA tf2001'- { ' �'
;:6a.89;
A. Sign
❑ Agent
/ ❑ AddresseE
B. Received by (Printed Name) C ate of eliver�
�S-6
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
g\S rvice Type
�!1 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
` E1 102595-01-M-251

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First-Class
Mail
'Postage, 8, Fes Paid
--uSPS­'
111 P.--rmit'ilin C-10---
p m,
• Sender: Please prih,.yoyr name, address, and171P+4 in this
—WQ DENR
1 919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
AUG 2' 9 2003
AND
itwooriEsviux 0,EWLINAL OFM

2 CERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPT
'mestic maii owy; No insurance Coverage Provided)
.1 i .
ri
F For delivery J ur website at www.usps.conle
F•rmation visit 9 •9 L
l USE
Postage $
3 certified Fee
3 3 Return Reclept Poe Pesbn
(Endorsement Required) Here
3 Restricted Delivery Fee L j INN
(Endorsement Required)
C
Tot y
"II MICHAEL PEOPLES, TO
sent WN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
orF 155 NORTH MAIN STREET _
orF -----------
154 CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/rmb 5/12/05

Certified Mail Provides: (esranea)ZppZeun�'o uuo�S�
■ A mailing receipt pee
■ A unique identifier for your mallpiece
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
'mportant Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail(
■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mali. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Re'<um Receipt service, please complete and attach a Retun
Receipt (PS Form 3811to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mallpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver foi
a du ficate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt ie
required.
■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with thi
endorsement "Restricted Delivery.
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the artl
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
MPORTANT: Save this receipt and present It when making an inquiry.
Internet access to delivery Information is not available on mail
addressed to APOs and FPOs.

VA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
May 12, 2005 Alan W. Klimek, P.E.. Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. -Michael Peoples, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155'North Main:Street
Cramerton,.NC.28032
Subject:
Dear Mr. Peoples:
7003 2260 00013552 3290
Notice of Violation - EMuent Limitations
Traclang #: NOV 2005-LV-0229
Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston -County
A review of the February 2005 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed violations of
the following parameters:
Pine
Parameter
Reported Value
Limit
001
Total Residual Chlorine
.20 violations (see below)
28 µg/L FIN
- 001
Total Phosphorus
1.53 mg/L
1.0 mg/L FIN
-On January 1, 2005, effluent limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) and Total Phosphorus
became effective. During February 2005, there were 20 violations of the TRC daily maximum 'limitation,
ranging from 270 µg/L-to 980 µg/L. Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to
correct any problems. The Division of Water Quality may .pursue enforcement actions for these and any
additional violations.'If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or
maintenance nroblems. and von anticipate remedial construction activities, then von may wish to
consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. You may contact Richard Bridgeman of this Office
for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bridgeman or
me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D_ Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
RMB
Mooresville Regional Office 1�7Onee
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 lv Ol ffiCarohna
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us avah
�ally
An Equal Opportunity/AffirmativeAction Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post ConsumerPaper`/

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
MR MICHAEL PEOPLES, TOWN MGR.
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/rmb 5/12/05
A.
X �'/ Agent
GG 0— Addressei
B. Received by Printed Name) C.Date of Deliver
.713105
D. Is delivery address different from item 11 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandis(
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
z. Articl� . i, r E R 2 a 2j � i B0 01 ? 3552 II �2 9 2► i dl 1,1 j i
(rran. t!i f. 1 It iIl ti III i1 ii i ! 1 t tl; Ii !
PS Form 3411 i February 2004 i i i i i Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-154

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE_- -' \ First -Class Mail
\\ Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, -and—ZIP+�'In i
' ox -
I1'I"1
_mor
NCDENR _ F
SURFACE V AA ER PRCgECTION
610 EAST CENTER tAVFNUE
;
SUITE 301��,,
MOORESVILLE" IVC
Q%
;
,115
'n M
.1�3ar:r=�?� �tt�t�irr�rrrr�irrr��r�t,rrr�rtrir�r�rrrlfirir�rlrririrrrrllii

F H
A
L
Postage
$
Certified Fee
Return Reciept Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
1uku MS LUANN ELLIS, INTERIM TOWN MANAGER
I
3 nt Tt TOWN OF CRAMERTON
e
3 155 NORTH MAIN STREET
` 'Street' CRAMERTON NC 28032---------.
orP01 swp/rmb 4/25/05

Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt (esianaa)gooZeun r'oo9V110i 8�
0 A unique identifier for your mailpiece
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
mportant Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class MaiI9 or Priority Malk
■ Certified Mali is not available for any class of international mail.
■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811? to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver foi
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt I;
required.
■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement 'Restricted Delivery".
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mali receipt is desired, please present the arti.
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt Is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
MPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
Internet access to delivery information is not available on mail
addressed to APOs and FPOs.

NCDENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. LuAnn A. Ellis, Interim Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Ms. Ellis:
April 25, 2005
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
7003 2260 00013552 3085
Subject: Notice of Violation - Effluent Limitations
Tracking #: NOV 2005-LV-0209
Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road W WTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County
A review of the January 2005.self-monitoring report for the subject facility revealed violations of
the following parameters:
Pine
Parameter
Reported Value -
Limit
001
Total Residual Chlorine
21 violations (see below)
28 µg/L FIN
001
Total Phosphorus
1.98 mg/L
1.0 mg/L FIN
On January 1, 2005, effluent limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) and Total Phosphorus
became effective. During January 2005, there were 21 violations of the TRC daily maximum Imitation,
ranging from 370 µg/L to 1710 µg/L. Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to
correct any problems. The Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for these and any
additional violations. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or
maintenance problems, nd You anticipate_ remedial construction activities; then you may wish to
consider appivine for a Special Order by Consent. You may contact Richard Bridgeman of this Office
for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bridgeman or
me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
Z).
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
RMB
Mooresville Regional Office 1�TOne
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NOrthCarohna
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us a'�
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/l0% vhy�®�y Post Consumer Paper �/ L 6

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
March 21, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
The Honorable -Catherine C. Young, Mayor -
Town of Cramerton
155 N. Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032-1425
Dear Mayor Young:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
tvC DEPT. OF
=-
SUBJECT: Offer and Acceptance For a
State Loan
Project No. CS370730-02.
Cramerton, North Carolina
As you were notified by letter from Governor Easley, the Town of Cramerton has been
approved for loan assistance from the Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund in the amount of
$3,000,000. This loan will assist the funding for upgrading the exiting WWTP to meet new
effluent limits and other infrastructure and process upgrades.
Enclosed are two (2) copies of an Offer and Acceptance Document extending a State
Revolving loan in the amount of $3,000,000. This offer is made subject to the assurances and
conditions set forth in the Offer and Acceptance Document. Upon executing the Offer and
Acceptance Document, please submit the following items to the Construction Grants and Loans
Section, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633 within forty-five (45)
days of receipt.
A resolution adopted by the governing body accepting the loan offer and making the
applicable assurances contained therein. (Sample copy attached)
2. One (1) copy of the original Offer and Acceptance Document executed by the authorized
representative for the project. Retain the other copy for your files.
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1633
\ Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: www.nccgl.net
1� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Nne
orthCarolina
Naturally

The Honorable Catherine C. Young, Mayor
March 21, 2005
Page 2
In accordance with G.S. 159-26(b)(6), a capital project fund is required to account for all
debt instrument proceeds used to finance capital projects. It is required that a capital project
ordinance, in accordance with G.S. 159-13.2, be adopted by the governing board authorizing all
appropriations necessary for the completion of the project. A copy of the approved ordinance
must be submitted to this office before requesting the first reimbursement request.
In addition, the enclosed pay request form must be used for all reimbursement requests.
You may make additional copies as needed. Also, enclosed is a copy of a memorandum
requesting your Federal Identification Number. Please contact the State Auditors office for the
compliance pertaining to the North Carolina Clean Water Revolving Loan and Grant Program.
On behalf of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, I am pleased to
make this offer of State Revolving Loan funds made available by the North Carolina Clean
Water Revolving Loan and Grant Act of 1997 and the Federal Clean Water Act Amendments of
1987.
ST/sd
Sincerely,
olm R. Blowe, E., Chief
Construction Grants &Loans Section
Enclosures
cc: Pease Associates
Mooresville Regional Office
Valerie Lancaster
SRF

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
11 Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
MS LUAIiII3fLLIS, INTERIM TOWN MANAGER
" s3OWN OF CRAMERTON
;LESS NORTH MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032
swp/rmb 4/25/05
A.
X
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Deliver)
`/- � 2-�
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
21
3%1 Qwvlce Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7003 2260 0001 3552.3085
102595-02-M-154

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
f
First-Class. Mail
Postage & Fees"'Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print,your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • c'�
NCDENR
SURFACE WA,I'ER PROTECTION '.
N
610 EAST CENTER AVENUE _ '.
cp
SUITE 301
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
O •� �rr�r�trr�rrrr��rrr�'rir�rrr�rl'r�r�r�rrrf'�ir�r�r�rr�r�rr►r��r�

W ArFR Michael F. Easley, Go a or
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
f Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 3, 2004
Mr. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Compliance Biomonitoring Inspection
Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No.NC0006033
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Young:
Whole effluent toxicity samples were collected on November 16 and 19, 2004 by John
Lesley and facility personnel for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The
test using these samples resulted in a pass; however, due to the control organism failure to meet
QA/QC criteria, this test was invalidated and could not be used for compliance judgement.
Toxicity test information follows: .
Test Type
Test Concentration
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
WliCarolina
Naturally
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia. pass/fail
4.7 %
PASS (INVALID)
100 %
13.6 neonates
75 %
8.2 neonates
6.89 SU
517 micromhos/cm
<0.0052 mg/l
7.21 SU
1230 micromhos/cm
<0.0052 mg/1
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to
have water quality impacts on the receiving stream. Should you have any questions regarding
the test please contact Mr. Lesley of this Office.
Sincerely,
2 D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
JL

l
Michael F. Easley, rl-..r
1
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 2, 2004
Mr. M. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton/Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Young:
Alan W. Klimek. P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on October 28, 2004, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. The inspection was initiated
based on several allegations of an anonymous complaint. The inspection revealed a properly operated and
well maintained WWTP with none of the allegations being warranted. PIease inform the facility's
Operator -in -Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this
report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at [phone].
Enclosure:
cc:
Sincerely,
Sj D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
\ Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Gaston County Health Department
N. C Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C.20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 u 2 31 NC0006033 I11 121 04/10/28 117 18IcI 19lgl 20Iu I
u ,_—' u u
Remarks
211111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIII I1166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA Reserved
67' 1.5 169 70 LJ 71 L`J 72 LJ 73 W 74 75I I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 04/10/26
02/09/01
Eagle Road WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
599 Eagle Rd
Cramerton NC 28032
01:10 PM 04/10/28
05/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)fTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Thomas J Shytle/ORC/704-825-7499/
Name, Address of Responsible Officialfritle/Phone and Fax Number
M. David Young,155 N. Main Street Cramerton NC 28032/Town Contacted
Yes
Manager/704-824-4337/7048259049
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit E Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program E Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectorr(ss))Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wesley N Bell (11�_ AX MRO WQ//704-663-1699/704-663-6040
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Richard M Bridgeman 704-663-1699/704-663-6040
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 10/28/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yac
No NA NE
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
S
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0 0
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
0 0 N 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑ 0 13
Is.the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
E 0 13 13
Comment:
Xes
No NA NE
Operations & Maintenance
Does the plant have general safety structures in place such as rails around or covers over tanks, pits, or wells?
0 0
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
® 0 0 0
Comment: The ORC indicated that the railing around the clarifiers would be improved in the proposed WWfP upgrades.
The facility appeared to be well maintained and properly operated.
Bar Screens ye
-No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■ 0
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
0 E3 Q
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0 0 0 0
Is the unit in good condition?
0
Comment: The mechanical bar is not operational; however, a new screening facility is included in the proposed WWTP
upgrades.
YQs
No NA NE
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
0 13 El 0
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Q
Are weirs level?
Q
Is the site free of weir blockage?
0 0 Q
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
0 0 0 0
Is scum removal adequate?
®0 13 0
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
13 0 0
Is the drive unit operational?
® Q 0 13
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?
13 0 0
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
0 0
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
0 ❑
Is the surface free of bulking ?
M Q 0 Q
Comment: One of the clarifiers was not operational due to needed repairs; however, the second clarifier has adequate
capacity. The facility staff must insure the stormwater runoff Is diverted away from entering the clarifiers.
Yes No NA NE
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
0 Q 13 Q
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
013130
Are the diffusers operational?
0 ® 0
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
0 13 13 0
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0 0

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 10/28/04 . Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
NE
Aeration Basins
Is the DO level acceptable?
Yes No NA
0 El ❑
❑
Are settleometer results acceptable?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Comment:
e No NA
Ye-
NE.
Disinfection
Type of system ?
Gas
Are cylinders secured adequately?
®❑ ❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
❑ 13
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
®❑ 0
❑
Is ventilation equipment operational?
0 0 ❑
0
Is ventilation equipment properly located?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is SCBA equipment available on site?
❑ ❑ ❑
0
Is SCBA equipment operational?
0 0 0
0
Is staff trained is operating SCBA equipment?
❑ 13 ❑
0
Is staff trained in emergency procedures?
❑ 11
Is an evacuation plan in place?
0 0 ❑
0
Are tablet chlorinators operational?
❑ 0 0
❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑ 0
❑
Number of tubes in use?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leakslopen drains)
❑ ❑ 0
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is there adequate detention time
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Comment: Chlorination system improvements are included with the proposed WWTP upgrades.
Ygs No
NE
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
_NA
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is the facility using a contract lab?
0 ❑ ❑
0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
0 ❑ Q
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
0 ❑ 0
❑
Comment: laboratory analyses are performed under certification #174. The facility utilizes a currently unapproved
method for the dissolved oxygen analyses. Mr. Chet Whiting (Division's Laboratory Certification Unit) will separately
address this laboratory practice.
Yes No NA
NE
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Is flow meter used for reporting?
0 13 ❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is flow meter operating properly?
®0 ❑
0
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑ ❑ 0
❑
Comment: The flow meter is calibrated twice per year. Ken Nash Co. last calibrated the flow meter on 6122/04,
Yes No NA
NE
R cow
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0 0 1313

Permit: NCO006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 10/28/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Are sampling and analysis data adequate and include:
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Plant records are adequate, available and include
O&M Manual
As built Engineering drawings
Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance and repairs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Is the facility description verified as contained in the NPDES permit?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for example: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, DO, Sludge
Judge, pH, and others that are applicable?
N.0 ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑■
❑❑■❑
®❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
0000
N ❑ ❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Records/Reports were well maintained. The facility incorporates a comprehensive process control program.
All "less than" values should be properly reported and calculated (monthly averages) on the DMR.
Yes No NA
NE
Influent Sam lino
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
v ❑ ❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
i ❑ ❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
N ❑ ❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
❑ ❑
❑
is sampling performed according to the permit?
❑ ❑
❑
Comment: The ORC indicated that the tubing would be replaced. The ORC must insure that the preset number of
gallons between the collection of composite samples (influent and effluent) does not exceed 1/24 of the total daily flow.
Yes blg NA
NE
Effluent Sam la_ina
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
i ❑ ❑
-
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
N 0 ❑
0

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility.: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 10/28/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent garnl2linct Ygs No NA NE
Comment: The ORC indicated the tubing would be replaced. DMRs were reviewed from December 03 through August
04. No limit violations were reported. No effluent fecal coliform was reported on 6118/04; however, the inspection
verified a fecal coliiform sample was collected and analyzed. An amended DMR should be resubmitted.
Upstream / Downstream Sam 12iM Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Aerobic Diaeger YaS No NA N
Is the capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the odor acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment;
MMARi . Yes Na NA NE
Is right of way.to the outfall properly maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are receiving water free of solids and floatable wastewater materials? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving waters free of solids / debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving waters free of foam other than a trace? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving waters free of sludge worms? 0 ❑ ❑ Q
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: The effluent appeared light brown with no floatable solids or foam.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 9, 2004
174
Mr. Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton/ Eagle Road WTTP
155 North Main St.
Cramerton, NC 28032
SUBJECT: Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection
Dear Mr. Shytle:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on July 15, 2004 by Mr. Chet
Whiting. Where deficiencies are cited in this report, a response is required as well as for
all lettered comments and/or recommendations. Within thirty days of receipt, please
supply this office with a written item for item description of how these deficiencies,
comments and/or recommendations were corrected. If the deficiencies cited in the
enclosed report are not corrected, _enforcement actions will be recommended. For
certification maintenance, your laboratory must continue to carry out the requirements
set forth in 15A NCAC 2H .0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from
this office. Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection. If you wish to obtain an
electronic copy of this report by email, or if you have questions or need additional
information please contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,
?James W. Meyeroratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Chet Whiting
Mooresville Regional Office
Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623
4405 Reddy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: www.dwglab.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally

On -Site Inspection Report
LABORATORY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE NO:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
EVALUATOR:
City of Cramerton WWTP Laboratory
155 N. Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032
174
July 15, 2004
Maintenance
Chet Whiting
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Mr. Thomas J. Shytle
1. INTRODUCTION: .
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H
.0800 for the analysis of environmental samples.
II. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory did a good job during this cycle. Improvements in overall documentation
procedures were noted. No deficiencies were cited in the inspection report below. We are
appreciative of the laboratory's efforts to implement comments and recommendations included
in the last report.
III. DEFICIENCIES, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,:
A. COMMENT: The time the pH meter is calibrated is not documented. This is considered
required supporting documentation in that it verifies that the meter was calibrated prior to sample
analysis.
REQUIREMENT: Document the calibration of the pH meter. Ref: 15a NCAC 2H .0805 (7) & (7)
REQUIREMENT: The laboratory must document all relevant calibration information. If the
information is not recorded, the laboratory has no means with which to prove that the
calibration was actually performed.
CONDUCTIVITY:
B. COMMENT: The accuracy of the conductivity meter auto cell constant function is not verified
annually.
REQUIREMENT: Verify the accuracy of the conductivity meter auto cell constant function
annually, and document.

COMMENT: Verification of the cell constant and temperature compensator functions may be
accomplished as follows:
1) Pour an adequate amount of standard into a beaker or other container and analyze at the
current temperature.
2) Slightly raise or lower the temperature of the standard or buffer by:
a) Placing the container in warm water or a 200 C incubator to raise temperature,
then analyze.
b) Placing the container in cool water or a refrigerator to lower temperature and
analyze.
There should not be a significant difference in the readings if the temperature compensation
devices are working properly.
Note: Extreme changes in temperature are not required, or desired 5 to 100 should be more
than adequate.
Note 2: Automatic cell constant and temperature compensation are directly connected for most
conductivity instruments with this function.
FECAL COLIFORM (MF):
C. COMMENT: The Fecal consumable material testing was conducted as specified in the
method however the number of colonies on the test plates were [<20 insufficient >60 too
numerous] to produce useful comparison data.
REQUIREMENT: Use sample or standard material that produces countable plates that better
indicate the viability of materials. A 20 to 60 colony per plate range is recommended, but not
required.
NOTE: The most common problem that has been observed is materials that do not support, or
inhibit colony growth. The test sample is insufficient when:
1) Too few colonies per plate are produced. For example, the difference between three
and six colonies on two plates could be attributed to the natural variability in this
biological test and would not be �a good determinate for material viability.
2) Plates with colonies too numerous to count may provide a rough visual survey that
could be misleading. If there were a very noticeable difference the information could be
used to indicate problems. A more subtle difference may be overlooked. The difference
between 420 and 320 colonies may not be easily recognizable and potential inhibition
problems might go undetected.
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS:
D. COMMENT: some additional items need to be added to laboratory tracking. Specifically filters
used for TSS analysis.
REQUIREMENT: Add consumable items to laboratory tracking procedure so that data can be
referenced to vendor and lot information.
NOTE: This procedure need not be very complicated. Most laboratories track incoming supplies
in some sort of log. Consumables may be tracked adding the date items were put in service as
well as received,,and opened.

If a lot of pH buffer was put in service on a specific date it follows that it was used until the next
lot was put in service or the lot number could be simply recorded on the bench sheet.
E. COMMENT: Some TSS analyses did not have at least a 1 mg weight change on the filter
but the results were calculated for a final result.
REQUIREMENT: When analyzing samples for suspended residue, sufficient sample
(maximum of 1 liter) must be filtered to yield at least 1.0 mg of residue on the filter. The size of
a total suspended solid sample must be between 1 mg and 200 mg. Limit the sample size to
that yielding no more than 200 mg of residue. Ref: Standard Methods, 18th Edition - Method
2540 D. Total Suspended Solids Dried at 103-1050 C section (3) c p2-56.
REQUIREMENT: On those occasions additional volume should be filtered for this analysis, or
the volume should be used to calculate a less than value using 1 mg as the final result. As an
example 250 mis of sample with a less than 1 mg weight change in.the filter would yield a
result of less than 4 mg/L.
NOTE: The laboratory pointed out that a less than symbol used in the spreadsheet interferes
with automatic calculations. The less than sign can be inserted manually on the printed DMR.
The less than values are considered zeros when averaging.
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
At least six sets of data per certified parameter and three DMRs were reviewed with supporting
documentation. No items other than those specified in the above report were observed.
V.- CONCLUSIONS:
Correcting the above cited comments and implementing the recommendations will help this
lab to produce quality data and meet certification requirements. Please respond to all
lettered comments.
Report prepared by: Chet whiting Date: July 21, 2004

Michael F. Usley. Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins. Deputy Director
Division of Water Qualiv,
February 25, 2004
Mr. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Compliance Biomonitoring Inspection
Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Young:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Biomonitoring Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on February 24, 2004 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office. The
operation and maintenance of the facility are commendable. Please inform the facility's Operator -in -
Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report. Aquatic toxicity
test results will be forwarded under separate cover when available.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Gaston County Health Department
JL
NorrhCarolina A� ju,�
N1WM,r1z(1y NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Resdonal Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-977-623-6748

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
J,ptEO 87,�5.
5� A � NPDES Compliance Inspection Report AM1 - North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7/ Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office NCDENR
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
Approval Expires
7/31 /85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NC0006033 04/02/24 B S 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA ...........Reserved............
3 3 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
10:15
September 1, 2002
Town of Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
Exit Time:
Permit Expiration Date:
Eagle Road, Cramerton
1:10
Gaston County, North Carolina
Date:
January 31, 2005
04/02/24
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------- Title(s)-------- Phone No(s):
Mr. Jamie Shytle / ORC / 704-825-7499
Mr. Eric Brackett / Backup Operator / 704-825-7499
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title:
Mr. M.D. Young
Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
Phone No.
Contacted?
155 North Main Street
704-824-4337
No
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit ® Flow Measurement • ® Operations & Maintenance ❑ Sewer Overflow
® Records/Reports ® Self -Monitoring Program ® Sludge Handling/Disposal ❑ Pollution Prevention
® Facility Site Review ❑ Compliance Schedules ❑ Pretreatment Program ❑ Multimedia
® Effluent/Receiving Waters ® Laboratory ❑ Stormwater ❑ Other:
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Aquatic toxicity test results will be forwarded under separate cover when available.
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
John Lesley
DENR-DWQ/MRO/[phone] FAX: [phone]
February 25, 2004
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office
Date:
Regulatory Office. Use Only
Action Taken
Date:
Noncompliance
Compliance
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

J
Self -Monitoring Program:
Self -monitoring reports were reviewed for the period December 2002 through
November 2003. Violations were reported for the weekly average and monthly average
BOD limitations in May 2003. No other violations were reported.

Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/24/04 Inspection Type: Bioassay Compliance
Yes
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
No
❑ ❑
NA NF
M ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
SO
❑
❑
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
M ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
rations &Maintenance
Yes No NA N
Does the plant have general safety structures in place such as rails around or covers over tanks, pits, or wells? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? so00
Comment: No guardrails around aeration basins or stormwater pond. The WWTP appeared to be very well
maintained and operated.
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance? M ❑ ❑ Cl
Is the unit in good condition? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Comment:The manual bar screen is rather old and in poor condition, and was originally designed for a textile plant
The bar screen should be replaced with one that is more suitable for domestic wastewater.
Secondary ClarjfleL
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Yes No
M ❑
NA
❑
N
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
M ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
M❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
M ❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
M ❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
❑
❑
❑
Is the surface free of bulking ?
M ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NF
Mode of operation rx-r PEPAT1104
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots? M❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? M❑ ❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 1

A
C
Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/24/04 Inspection Type: Bioassay Compliance
Aeration Basins Yes No NA N
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Are settleometer results acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Disinfection
Type of system ?
Are cylinders secured adequately?
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
Is ventilation equipment operational?
Is ventilation equipment properly located?
Is SCBA equipment available on site?
Is SCBA equipment operational?
Is staff trained is operating SCBA equipment?
Is staff trained in emergency procedures?
Is an evacuation plan in place?
Are tablet chlorinators operational?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Number of tubes in use?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is there adequate detention time
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Comment:
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters (excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
Is the facility using a contract lab?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Comment:BOD is not performed at the on -site lab
Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is flow meter operating properly?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment:Calibrated twice'per year. Last calibrated on 12/8/2003.
■ O O ❑
■❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ O
■ O ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ O
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No, NA NF
❑ ❑ Cl
❑ ❑ Cl
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Yes No NA N
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 2

W
Q
Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/24/04 Inspection Type: Bioassay Compliance
Record Keening
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Yes No
N ❑
NA
❑
NF
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
E ❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
N ❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are sampling and analysis data adequate and include:
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Plant records are adequate, available and include
❑
❑
❑
O&M Manual
As built Engineering drawings
Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance and repairs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users?
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
W ❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
E ❑
❑
❑
Is the facility description verified as contained in the NPDES permit?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,.for example: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, DO, Sludge
0❑
❑
❑
Judge, pH, and others that are applicable?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑ ❑
❑
Comment: Records/reports were very well organized and complete and up-to-date
Influent Sampling ina
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Yes No
❑
NA
❑
NF
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
E ❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
N❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
U ❑
❑
❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
N ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Yes No
❑
NA
❑
NIF
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
0❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
E❑
❑
❑
Page# 3

I
Permit: NC0006033 Owner - Facility: Town of Cramerton - Eagle Road WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/24/04 Inspection Type: Bioassay Compliance
Effluent Samnlina Yes No NA NF
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Toxicity test results will be forwarded under separate cover when available.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)?
Yes No
e ❑
NA
❑
N
❑
Comment:
Effluent Pion
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Yes No
M ❑
NA
❑
NIF
❑
Are receiving water free of solids and floatable wastewater materials?
M ❑
❑
Cl
Are the receiving waters free of solids / debris?
❑ ❑
Cl
Are the receiving waters free of foam other than a trace?
❑ ❑
❑
Are the receiving waters. free of sludge worms?
Cl ❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑ ❑
❑
0
Comment:
Page# 4
3

TOWN OF
est. 1921
February 6, 2004
The following information is provided to`the citizens of Cramerton asArequired m'the Federal Clean
Water Act, of 1999 and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1C
The Town`of.Cramer' owns and operates the Eagle Road Wastewater Treatment Facility. It s located at
659 Eagle Road. The facility: is permitted through the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System to
discharge up to3four million gallons of treated wastewater per day into the South Fork Catawba River. The
permit number is NC0006033. The sanitary sewer collection system that conveys the untreated wastewater to
our treatment facilities is also';permitted through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, DlvlsiomofWater Quality."The permit number is WQCS00058.
During the calendar year 2003, the Eagle Road facilities reported two discharge violations of the permit. The
first violation was reported.ogMay:23, 2003. This violation was caused by the severe flooding we
experienced on that. date , and resulted in an overflow of an estimated 40,000 gallons of wastewater into the
River. The wastewater.was'treated with granular sodium hypochlorite prior to discharge for pathogen
control. The second violation ;was for the week of June 2, 2003. The reported violation was for: exceeding the
weekly average..for.biochemical oxygen demand of 15.0 mg/L. The violation was a result of mechanical
equipment •failures andno adverse effects were observed. -
During the' calendar year 2003, the .Town of Cramerton had two reportable sanitary sewer overflows. A
reportable overflow is one.that causes untreated wastewater to enter any receiving waters oft. State of
North Carolina Both Viol ations.were reported on May 22, 2003 and were a result of overflouring manholes
due to excessive flows.°.The ekcessive flows were a result of the severe flooding we experienced on that date.
Additional,information. regarding the performance of our facility or collection system can be obtained by
contacting'the Town Manager's Office at 704-824-4337 or;the Wastewater Department Superintendent at
:.4
704-825-7499 '
General regulatory information may be obtained by contacting the NCDENR/DWQ at 704 669-1699 and
referencing the above mentioned. permit numbers
The Town of Cramerton Utility Department is committed fo providing the best water quality service possible
to our citizens and commercial -cuatomers 'We will eontmue to uphold the`highest professional standards
within our department and believe that sound envUorimental stewardship is the key to our success.
155 North Main Street .Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
M. David Young
Town of Cramerton
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Permittee:
F? FAA
Ilk 1 • 02
NORTh1ARO��1N�A DEP��unty0 " ;
EN V I RO N N}ENl� BAN Doi I�ATUF2A'Lf F�ES�OU R��,�S
December 11, 2003 r '.J
SUBJECT: Renewal Application Requirements for Permit' NC0006033 K
Eagle Road WWTP
Your NPDES permit for a municipally owned/operated WWTP expires on January 31, 2005. This advance notice is
being sent to explain the new requirements for your permit renewal application.
You are receiving this advance notice 'because your facility has a permitted flow at or above 1 MGD, or your
WWTP has a pretreatment program. If either of these criteria no longer apply to your facility, contact the NPDES
'Unit before submitting a renewal application.
Federal (40 CFR 122) and state '(15A NCAC 2H.0105(e)) regulations require that permit renewal applications be filed
at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. Your renewal application is due to the Division no later -
than August 4, 2004. Failure to apply for renewal by the appropriate deadline may result in a civil penalty assessment
or other enforcement activity at the discretion,of the Director.
The U.S. EPA revised and expanded the application requirements for municipal permits, effective August 1, 2001.
EPA forms 1 and 2A are attached to this Notice, and must be used for your permit renewal application. The new
application requirements mandate additional effluent testing:
1. Conduct three Priority Pollutant Analyses (PPAs) and submit results with your renewal application.
Collect samples for the PPAs in conjunction with sampling for your current quarterly toxicity test. The
new PPA requirements differ from previous versions. Each PPA must include:
➢ Analyses for all total recoverable metals listed in Part D of form 2A. This includes metals that are
not normally monitored through your NPDES permit.
➢ Analyses for total phenolic compounds and hardness.
➢ Analyses for all of the volatile organic compounds listed in Part D.
➢ Analyses for all of the acid -extractable compounds listed in Part D.
➢ Analyses for all base -neutral compounds listed in Part D.
2. Conduct four toxicity tests for an organism other than Ceriodaphnia and submit results with your renewal
application. The tests should be conducted quarterly, with samples collected on the same day as your
current toxicity test. Call the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] for guidance in conducting the -
additional tests.
These additional analyses must accompany your permit renewal application, or any request for a major permit
modification. The Division cannot draft your permit without the additional data. Any data submitted cannot be
over 41/2 years old, and must account for seasonal variation (samples cannot be collected during the same season
each year if collected over multiple years).
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET@http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES [e-mail]

Renewal Notice for Permit NC0006033
Gaston County
Page 2
If your permit already contains a requirement for an annual effluent pollutant scan, additional scans are not
required [provided you have conducted at least 3 scans prior to submitting your application].
If any wastewater discharge will occur after the current permit expires, this NPDES permit must be renewed.
Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate Federal and North Carolina law. Unpermitted
discharges of wastewater could result in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day. If all wastewater
discharge has ceased at your' facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact Vanessa Manuel of the Division's
Compliance Enforcement Unit at [phone], extension 532. You may also contact the Mooresville Regional
Office at [phone] to begin the rescission process.
Use the checklist below to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must
submit with the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me. My telephone number, fax
number and e-mail address are listed at the bottom of the previous page.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files _
M66resvilleRegional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES File
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
❑ A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since issuance of the
last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
❑ The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized Representative.
Submit one signed original and two copies.
❑ If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares the renewal
package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to the Authorized
Representative (see Part II.B.1 Lb of the existing NPDES permit).
❑ A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other solids)
generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. ' If your facility has no such plan (or the
permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this'in writing. Submit one signed original and two
copies. This information can be included in the cover letter.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NC DENR / Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

�� Cxa'�roN
est 1921
Mr.
D.Rex.:Gleasqn,-P,E,
Water'... Quality Regional Supery , i
NCf)t"WQI Mooresville
, "
901�4orth�Mam , Street
Moorpsyille, NQ1291J5
T :aie he,f,"hA aeration equipmenty;
the 2,.Omg/L dete6ti
vi consi er this
s inf
If V have,Iiuestioi
need further
S
2003
2003
'eferenced
SEP 1 6 2003
WATER GA U ,LIT 11 SE TIPS -
,
-0137
33
effluent
mation *nd, our past track `record and waive any. f
orinai,i6n, cd1l,me at 704-825-7499
the
10

n
n ii� 3r' �— +) �5t�, /7� 1�
Postage $�%
Certified Fee
m
U �s%CI)
rk
Return Receipt Fee S C
r (Endorsement Required)
7 w`
7 Restricted Delivery Fee
� (Endorsement Required)
MR DAVID YOUNG, TOWN MANAGER •J
TOWN OF CRAIv1ERTON
155 NORTH MAIN STREET
CgpMERTON NC 28032
9/8/03 ---------------------
wq/nnb -

Certified Mail Provides:
■ A mailing receipt
■ A unique. identifier for your mailpiece `
■ A signature upon delivery
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
Important Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
■ Certified-Mail-is'not available for any class of international mail.
W-NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables,.pldete consider Insured or Registered Mail.
W;For an addPio`ri'fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof o
-cleliv F$ ,T6 obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
` Fiece PT, Form 3811)'to the article and add applicable postage to cover thr
•• fee. En`Urse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver to
a duplicate.return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt. I!
required. .
■ For ah —addittbnal fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the,mailpiece with thi
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti
cle at the post office for postmarking: If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry..:
PS Form 3800, January 2001 (Reverse) 102595-01-M-104!

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. M. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Young:
Michael F. Easley, Governo - /
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 8, 2003
7001 2510 0004 8287 5985
Subject: Notice of Violation - Effluent Limitations
Town of Cramerton — Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
NOV-2003-LV-0137
Gaston County
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
A review of the June 2003 self -'monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter:
Pipe Parameter Reported Value Limit
001 Biochemical Oxygen Demand 21.64 mg/L 15.0 mg/L FIN
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The
Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the
violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you
anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by
Consent. You may contact Richard Bridgeman of this Office for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bridgeman or
me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Compliance/Enforcment Unit
Mooresville Regional Office. 919 North Main Street,
North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

0 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
0 Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
0 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
MR DAVID YOUNG, TOWN MANAGER
TOWN Off':CRAMERTON
155 NORTHMAIN STREET
CRAIVMRTON NC 28032
wq/nub 9/8/03
A.
41
X 13 Agent
El Addresse(
B' Received by (Printed Ah.) C. D et flDe Deliver) ,I r,�ver)
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 11 'Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 11 No
3. rvice Type
� Certified Mail El Express Mail
13 Registered El Return Receipt for Merchandise
EJ Insured Mail 11 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 11 Yes
Arl
(Tr..._7 01 2510 0004 8287 5985 1
IS Form381 T. Auadst'20bl L 'Do6estic Rl.iutrr Rec61pt' 102595-01 -M-251

UNITED STATES POSTAL SER7First--C-I?sMa -s-I----
7 -R-o5tag44-F6es-Paid
V(�
— Permit .-G 4 0—_
"I
• -wSender: Please prntyOu,acdress,a=�
YIP
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY..-'
919 NORTH MAIN STREET 'I,-
MOORESVILLE NC 28115 L!,-
Ytu
N J,

cxa�x°-FoN
v
POTW Director
Copy; David Young, Town Mai
D. Rex' Gleason; Moores
lle, DQW .-
Oe fwn 0-1 S 1�C�
Mg®�BA�UFYP�- i'tQ �L OFFICF
R.y
t �s
JUL
WADE
IpE�O1
18, 2003
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

TIT

TOWN OF
`��' CRAMEI�IDN
est 1921
I have included ari"4ttA'chinehthat :::'gI
collection system and punijpm&§tatu
our
r collection system lineis.� Mc-t4re's'
picture 5,shbW§,the flooded chl6nine
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LJOORESVIL17z Oc
FFICE
WAR 2 6 2003
'3;7":an& 8 show the flooded areas of
wifi6 affected- pumping stations, and
at the 'Eagle Road facility.
We Will mark the -man-holos along the affected
pipe line runs and pursue: funding to have
them raised above the 100 years flood level. The flooded areas of the wastewater
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

treatment plant will be modified and raised during the facility upgrade scheduled for the
Fall of 2003.
If you have any questions, call 704-825-7499
Thank You
Jamie Shytle
Facilities Director
Copy: M. David Young, Town Manager
file

a
i' ... �.'€ )... � .-. i�', n►� .psi 1.�._� . 6..1,i""-'riaf/.�i'a
I

micnaei r. rasiey, uvvemVI
S
V0
KiC�•:K
Mr. David Young
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main St
Cramerton, NC 28032
Subject:
Dear Mr. Young:
:.AUG 2 6 2002
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
A
C ?EPA. n� Ch;lr:^°air e,wi
S EP 1 2 2002
Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Town of Cramerton (formerly Automotive) WWTP
Gaston County
Case Number LV 02-083
I considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have decided to remit the entire civil penalty in the
amount of $1,335.45 and hereby close our case number LV 02-083.
Please be advised that a full reduction of the civil penalty assessment in no way precludes
the Division from taking future enforcement action against the subject facility should additional
violations occur.
If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Sledge at
[phone], extension 547.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
k4-'t—
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Enforcement File
Central Files
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 800 623-7748 [phone] Fax: [phone]

May 1, 2002
MEMO TO: Rex Gleason
FROM: Richard Bridgemany�
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Case No. LV 02-083
Town of Cramerton
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Gaston County
The Town of Cramerton was assessed a civil penalty of $1335.45, including $85.45 in
enforcement costs, on 4/9/02, for violations occurring in 11/01. The case covers a Sulfides
monthly average violation and one Sulfides daily maximum violation. �^
The remission request is based on the probability that the violations were the result of a
laboratory error. PAR Laboratories has indicated that the NaOH solution used to preserve
Sulfide samples was found to be a "bad batch", resulting in erroneously high results.
It is the writer's opinion that a remission of civil penalties is justified.
HAWPWIN\DOC\MEMO\CRAMERTN.RR
67 ,

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 2, 2002
Mr. T. J. Shytle,' Jr.
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Subject: Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Cramerton WWTP
NC DEPT.
x,.
MAY 0 6 2002
NPDES Permit Number NC0006033
Gaston County
Case Number LV 02-083
Dear Mr. Shytle:
The Division of Water Quality is in receipt of your 'request for remission of the civil
penalty assessed in the matter of the case noted above. Unfortunately, we did not find a
completed form waiving your right to an administrative hearing along with your letter when it
arrived in this office. As this is a necessary part of the remission request, we respectfully ask
that you complete the attached waiver form and return it to the attention of "Bob Sledge" at the
letterhead address. Once the completed waiver form is received, we can continue with the
processing of your request. Your request will be placed .on the agenda of the Director's next
scheduled enforcement conference and you will be notified of the result.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Bob Sledge.at [phone],
extension 547:
Sincerely,
S1 71- z
hannon Langley, Supervisor
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
cc: Mooresville. Regiorial.Office wlattach ffients
Central Files w/attachments
Enforcement File w/3 attachments
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 800 623-7748 [phone] ,

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES .
COUNTY OF GASTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 02 - 083
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,335.45 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties,
does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate
that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the
day of
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
Year

TOWN OF.
est 1921 ' APR 2
6 2002 .
April 2002 poi 'T $� :: r GLLUL/ly
P
cc: David Young/ Town Manager
D: Rex Gleason/ NCDENR/DWQ/
Files w/ attachments
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 704/824-4337

down of rtamettoa
155 North Main Street, Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Attachment I
Attn: Central Files
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJECT: NPDES NCO006033 Non-compliance for Sulfides November 2001 and December 2001
Our current NPDES permit requires us to sample one day per month for effluent sulfide. The permit limit
is mass based at 13.6 lbs./day monthly average.
On November Owe sampled, and the resulting analysis indicated 112.9 lbs./day. This indicated a.
violation of the permit limit.
Based on the facts that we have only one Significant Industrial User (SIU) in our pretreatment program,
and the SIU contributes over seventy percent of our average daily flow, we contacted them to investigate
the possible sulfide interference.
On November 28'k the SIU sampled for sulfide in their discharge and the resulting analysis indicated
58.7 mg/L. The flow from the SIU for that period was 1,068,310 gallons. Standard calculations indicated
a discharge of 523 lbs/day of sulfide.
Both the Industry and the Town of Cramerton POTW uses the same contract laboratory for sulfide
sampling and analysis
On December I Vk we sampled the treatment plant effluent for sulfide and the analysis indicated 5.9 mg/l
or 62.991bs/day. Again, this was a violation of the permit limit.
At this point, we began to suspect that the Industry was slug loading the POTW, with sulfide or there was
a procedural error with the sampling and analysis by the contract laboratory.
On December 21 ", we contacted Mr. Jay Stewart who is the representative for the SIU and directed him to
cease operation of the process(s) that were causing the sulfide interference. He was also required to
provide the POTW director with a daily sampling report and update on his investigation into the sulfide
problem.
On December 26"' we received information from Mr. Stewart indicating an error in the analysis from the
contract laboratory.
We contacted Mr. Everett with Par Laboratories to verify and get an explanation for the errors. The letters
from Mr. Everett are attached for your review. It seems that the reported data for sulfide is unreliable and
therefore, cannot be used to report non-compliance status.

In light of this information, we have curtailed the stringent monitoring requirements for sulfide by the SIU
and removed them from notice. They will continue to monitor sulfides on a monthly basis and review best
available technologies that employ the use of chemistry in the dyeing processes that will not inhibit or
interfere with the POTW operations.
We request that the non-compliance. reported on the November and December 2001 DMR's be removed
for NPDES 4 NC0006033.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Thank You
Thomas J. Shytle, Jr.
POTW Director, Town of Cramerton
Copy: David Young, Town Manager
John Leslie, DQW, Mooresville regional office
WO -WIZ N" 114 P.2
,� a n .11 , 2 0 0 2 c 4: 5 2 P M, FROM PAR LABORATtR I ES 1 70d58883 �M b Cc

s '
�� PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 Graham Park Drive
LaeouarORIE& INC. PO Box 411483
Charlotte, NC 28241-1483
Phone: [phone]; Fax-- 704-588-8335 om
MC Cen # ZO-' SC Cent # 9900300
www.parkibs.com
January 1, 2002
Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Jamie,
I am writing this letter to follow up on our discussion of the recent sulfide results.
We did some follow up testing for the industry, Eagle Mountain Finishing, and found that
there is some issue in the sampling procedure. When samples were taken with both zinc
acetate and sodium hydroxide in the container, the results were higher. When the
samples were preserved with only 2N zinc acetate then the pH was adjusted to 9.0 or
greater at the lab prior to analysis, the results were lower.
We have had some discussions and done some checking and it seems that the problem
was the result of a bad batch of the sodium hydroxide solution we were using to preserve
the samples. The solution is typically made up in a 1 liter size and the batch we were
using as a field preservative was quite old while the solution we use in the lab is usually
made up on a weekly or bi-weekly basis.
Because we were using the same batch of sodium hydroxide solution for your November
and December sample containers, we believe those results may also be incorrect.
We have since made a new batch of sodium hydroxide preservative and checked it for
quality. In addition, we will be preparing fresh preservative each month to avoid. future
occurrences of this sort.
If you have any other questions, or 1 can be of further help, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Russell M. Everett
President

2002 E 4.: 52PM
January 1.2002
FROM PAR L,ABq?ATtRIES 41 764555533t+
lib _
-
'Cie
61iIJ
j 9
PAR Lcaborator.os. 1ne,
r rY i�R l
51�
2217 Grasaro Park Aries -
PO Boot Al 1483
JA/h)G
VS1-4)
Charlaft, NC 28211 _1 AS3
Phom: 70A5884M331 Fax- 70A.58683U
,� an � as 3C Grr s srornoor
Bob Kaufman
Eagle Mountain Finishing
293 12"' Street
Cramcrton, NC 28032
Dear Bob,
-1 am writing this letter to follow up on our discussion of your sulfido results.
We ran 3 days of samples per your request, which showed higher amexpected results.
We thin took one more sample the -following Monday that fell iDto your normal range.
It appears that there is some issue�in the sampling procedure. When Samples were taken
with both zinc acetate and sodium hydroxide: in the container. your results were higba.
Wbcn the samples were preserved with only 2N zinc acetaw then the pH was adjusted to
9.0 or greater at the lab prior to analysis, your results were lower.
We have had some -discussions anddgne some cbecldng and it seems that the problem
was tht result of a bad batch of the sodium hydroxide solution we was using to pneerve
the sample$.
Because we were using the same batch of sodium hydroxide solution when we sampled
on November 28, we believe the reported result of 58.7 ppm was also incortrct.
We have since mado anew batch of sodium hy+&aoxiida preservahva Mvi rbex3md it for
quality to avoid.. future occurrences of this sort.
If you have any other questions, or I can be of further help, please feel free to call rue.
Sincerely.
Poo
Russell M_ Everett
President

TOWN OFq%.. 117
Aff
AND URAL
99
est. 1921
APR 1 9 2002
April 16, 2002'
5 ER VNI
-Ms. Coleen
Water Quality Section , ell -
Division uN�ater Quality
1617 Mail-$ervice Center
Raleigh, North Carojj#0
Dear M828ifflifi§
-7
tease lo. y
the statement(s) or attdbhrqent(,,
J. Shvtle4f.
cc: David Young/ Town Manager
D. Rex Gleason/ NCDENR/DWQ/ Mooresville
Files w/ attachments
ot the POTW
1119YO
155 North Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032 70.4/824-4337

down of f tameattcA
155 North Main Street, Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Attachment I
Attn: Central Files
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJECT: NPDES NC0006033 Non-compliance for Sulfides November_2001 and December 2001
Our current NPDES permit requires us to sample one day per month for effluent sulfide. The permit limit
is mass based at 113.6 lbs./day monthly average.
On November 1" we sampled, and the resulting analysis indicated 112.9 lbs./day. This indicated a
violation of the permit limit.
Based on the facts that we have only one Significant Industrial User (SILL) in our pretreatment program,
and the SIU contributes over seventy percent of our average daily flow, we contacted them to investigate
the possible sulfide interference.
On November 28t1' the SIU sampled for sulfide in their discharge and the resulting analysis indicated
58.7 mg/L. The flow from the SIU for that period was 1,068,310 gallons. Standard calculations indicated
a discharge of 523 lbs/day of sulfide.
Both the Industry and the Town of Cramerton POTW uses the same contract laboratory for sulfide
sampling and analysis
On December 110' we sampled the treatment plant effluent for sulfide and the analysis indicated 5.9 mg/l
or 62.99 lbs/day:.Again, this was a violation of the permit limit.
At this point, we began to suspect that the Industry was slug loading the POTW with sulfide or there was
a procedural error with the sampling and analysis by the contract laboratory.
On December 21 s' we contacted Mi. Jay Stewart who is the representative for the SIU and directed him to
cease operation of the process(s) that were causing the sulfide interference. He was also required to
provide the POTW director with a daily sampling report and update on his investigation into the sulfide
problem.
On December 26'l' we received information from Mr. Stewart indicating an error in the analysis from the
contract laboratory.
We contacted Mr. Everett with Par Laboratories to verify and get an explanation for. the errors. The letters
from Mr. Everett are attached for your review. It seems that the reported data for sulfide is unreliable and
therefore, cannot be used to report non-compliance status.

i
In light of this information, we have curtailed the stringent monitoring requirements for sulfide by the SIU
and removed them from notice. They will continue to monitor sulfides on a monthly basis and review best
available technologies that employ the use of chemistry in the dyeing processes that will not inhibit or
interfere with the P©TW operations.
We request that the non-compliance reported on the November and December 2001 DAM's be removed
for NPDES # NC0006033.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Thank You
Thomas J. Shyde, Jr.
POTW Director, Town of Cramerton
Copy. David Young, Town Manager
John Leslie, DQW, Mooresville regional office
f Vo•4bCj
J d it 2002 c 4: 5 2 P FRC]i�i PAR LaBCiR.'a i pRI #1 7®d58883351�b C
�,L7)J 3 9
N• ii- P.2

PAR Laboratories, Inc_
2217 Graham Park Drive
PO Box 411,483
Chariotte, NC 28241-1483 t
Phone_ 704-588-8333; Fax_ 704-588-8335
NC Cert a 20: SC Cert # 99w-gwI
January 1, 2002
Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 25032
Dear Jamie,
I am writing this letter to follow up on our discussion of the recent sulfide results.
We did some follow up testing for the industry, Eagle Mountain Finishing, and found that
there is some issue in taie sampling procedure. When samples were taken with both zinc
acetate and sodium hydroxide in the container, the results were higher- When the
samples were preserved with only 2N zinc acetate then the pH was adjusted to 9.0 or
greater at the lab prior to analysis, the results were lower.
We have had some discussions and done some checking and it seems that the problem
was the result of a bad batch of the sodium hydroxide solution we were using to preserve
the samples. The solution is typically made up in a 1 liter size and the batch we were
using as a held preservative was quite old while the solution we use in the lab is usually
made up on a weekly or bi-weekly basis.
Because we were using the sarne batch of sodium hydroxide solution for your November
and December sample containers, we believe those results may also be incorrect.
We have since made a new batch of sodium hydroxide preservative and checked it for
quality. In addition, we will be preparing fresh preservative each month to avoid future
occurrences of this sort.
If you have any other questions, or I can be of further help, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Russell M. Everett
President

H02e 4:57P
January 1, 2002
. Fp lM pAR LAeGRATCR I ES :4 3 7pa1 8$3s5 IV U • 4 D [ 4 r • ire. P.2
f1ab C�
PAR 8r�bar�a�cr"sus, Inc,
2217 Gra ern Perk 0&0
PO Soot Al 7482
Chariaft, NC 2S2A 1-; d33
Phone: 70-i.53G43=; F= 7CLd-568-3336
me C+rt'g 4242� 3C C,err 0, sscmat;or
Bob Kaufman
Eagle Mount n Finishing
293 22� Street
Cramcrtoni, NC 28032
Dear Bob,
.1 am writing this letter to follow up on our discussion of your sulfide results.
We ran 3 days of samples per your request, which, showed higher than expected results.
We then took one more sample thc-following Monday that fell into your norrnAi range.
It appe=axs llsat thae is S tome issue ja the sling procedure. When a6agles wee taken
with bogs xiuc acetate and sodium hydroxide in the contWzer. your results ewers high=
Whcn the sarnples were prescxvcd with only 2N zinc acetae thcn the pH was adjusted to
9-0 or greater at the lab prior to analysis; Your results were lower.
We have had some, discussions and dome sumac chccldng and it seems that the pmblc m
was the result of a bad batch of the sodium hydroxide solution we eves® usinng to preserve
the s=p.les.
Because we were using the same batch of sodium ilydroxide solution when we sampled
o November 28, we believe the sorted result of 59.7 ppm was also incOrrect.
We have since. —►tie a new bateia of sodium Hydroxide pr-esOrvativ" and C.bec,keA i9 for
quality to avoid. fuuire occurrences of this sort.
If you have any oar questions, or I can he of further help, please feel free to call me.
.�incercly,
Russell M. Everest
President

r
n
D'
1
tom! I bail L U S
Postage
u
Certified Fee
$
N
Return Receipt Fee
dn
(Endorsement Required)
�!i,+
n'l��'PoHsere
3 Restricted Delivery Fee (EndorsementRequired)
jJ
To MR DAVID YOUNG, TOWN
u sen TOWN OF CRAMERTON
a sire 155 NORTH MAIN STREET .............
or CRAMERTON NC 28032 WQ
�,ty •-----------

Certified Mail Provides:
■ A mailing receipt
■ A unique identifier for your maiipiece
■ A signature upon delivery
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
'mportant Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Foi
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof o'
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse maiipiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver foi
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt ie
required.
■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee of
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
■ if a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the anti•
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
�8 Form 3800, January 2001 (Reverse) 102595-01 -M-1 M

eAT�RpG
CO
April 9, 2002c,
o 0W6 CLfJ�f
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Young:
v/
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N:C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Town of Cramerton-Eagle Road WWTP
Case No. LV 02-083
Gaston County,
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1335.45 ($1250.00 civil penalty + $85.45 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Cramerton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by the Town of Cramerton for the month of
November 2001. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the discharge
limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0006033. The violations are summarized in
Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town_ of Cramerton
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0006033 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty maybe assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of.law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of.Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment
�ainst the Town of Cramerton:
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
1 800 623-7748 Fax [phone]

$ 16500, �,
$ 85.45
$ JS
For / of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
ischarging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit monthly average effluent
limit for Sulfides.
For / of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0006033, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit daily maximum effluent
limit for Sulfides.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of.the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing,
such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative
hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and
a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violations;
(c) the violations were inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violation;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented -in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review the information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform
you of his decision in the matter of the remission request. His response will
provide details regarding case status, directions for payment and provision for
further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management Commission's
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that the Committee
cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a
complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.

3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not.a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this civil
penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704/663-1699.
-Y
(Date)
ATTACHMENTS
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

Attachment A
Town of Cramerton
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Case Number LV 02-083
Limit Violations, November 2001
Monthly Average'Limit Violations .
Parameter Reported Value Limit Units
Sulfides 112.9 * 13.6 lb/day
Daily Maximum Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit Units
Sulfides 112.9 * 27.3 lb/day
* denotes assessment of civil penalty.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF Gaston
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF
CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
AND STIPULATION OF FACTS
The Town of Cramerton 1
PERMIT NO. NC0006033 ) FILE NO. LV 02-083
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling' for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated
the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be
submitted to the Directorof the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days
from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2002
TELEPHONE

'
�. ENT ) JAN' 16 ?nn 7 -
NMES PERNO. MC '205 to-o33 . 'j --
MIT
DISCHARGENO.'Qn'l _�"-' MONTH AlQT—e nR CZ YEAR Zoo 1
FACILITY NAME A[TIP 2oAn W U,JTP
CLASS_ T COUNY r��o�
T )M GRADE PHONE7Q w • S ? �9 9.
I
CHARGE (ORC)
OPERATOR.IN RESPONSIBLES
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (l) pan L&M
(2) C�gp M. )-AS
;51 �Pr� Lo
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED
PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES o rs
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to::
--- - 12 - 12 -
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIV. OF ENVIRONhIE1VTAL MANAGEMENT
x
(SIolq'ATVRE TOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
DEHNR
BY THIS SIG I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
P.Q. BOX 29MS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
RALEIGH, NC 27626-OM5 `
DEM Form MR-1, (12/93)

_ :'Facility Status: (Please.cbeck one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet
g � g � Permt-regttttLments _{Y.�j� Y:
-• OompIiant--
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements . -
:..Noncompliant ,
If the -facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
.and a.time table foi improvements'to be made.
f le &AJ 0,j -t! /ol to l ter_ trni C51 C? LP Mh;q 1.C)64n-
c l rcr K_ . 1-tym iTen
lliai l A e.� ,A JD �EQUCsL�a Ta i2ey ►eW 0)y AJ4 10ro -dis a M wIM 2C Sut F t o-e Co,aGCiyl'r(�M;)g
- "I certiry,.under penalty of law; that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or. supervision.in accordance
'witira system -designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
/4 . DAV / D o u'V E7a -
Perrmmititt/ee t or'
Signature or ermitter** / - Dated.=-r -
Permittee Address Phone umber =-: - P - i ` ' ermit
- N.�.�_ _Ezp Date
PARAMETER CODES --
00010 Temperature 00556 Oil & Grease 0.0951 -Total Fluoride '--- -'—' 01067 Nickel 50060.'Total
00076 Turbidity 00600 Total Nitrogen . 01002Total Arsenic --: 01077 .Silver Residual
00080 Color (Pt -Co) 00610 Ammonia Nitrogen - 01092 Zinc Chlorine
00082 Color (ADMI) 00625 Total Kieldhal _-- 01027 Cadmium 01105 Aluminum
-Nitrogen
00095 Conductivity 00630 Nitrates/Nitrites 01032 Hexavalent Chromium 01147 Total Selenium..71880 Formaldehyde
00300 Dissolved Oxygen 01034 Chromium 31616 Fecal Coliform ' 71900 Mercury
00310 BOD5 00665 Total Phosphorous 32730 Total Phenolics 81551 Xylene
00340 COD 00720 Cyanide 01037 Total Cobalt 34235 Benzene
00400 pH 00745 Total Sulfide 01042 Copper 34481 Toluene
00530 Total Susvended 00927 .Total Magnesium 38260 MBAS
Residue 00929 Total Sodium 01045 Iron 39516 PCBs
00545 Settleable Mat= 00940 Total Chloride 01051 Lead .50050 Flow - - -
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension.581 or 534.
The monthly avergr fat.fppat coliform is to be reported;i a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the repor fig
facility�'si `ttfor%e�orttng aata ' ` -
* ORCaniis visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A .0202 (b) (5) (B).
- ..._ ^ -• -_-v .!ti --gin;!ani2_0j13­_
._ '—If'signed by outer rmitter, delegati_om of sigsaatory suthority:must on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
�! - - _. .` "•lam. • � _.. . _

_ Y-
Permit NC0006033
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING..REQUIREMENT-S
Monthly
Average
Weekly -
Average..
:Daily
Maximum
- :Measufeinent
`Freguency
Safn� le
Type
$ample -
(:ocatiatil -
Flow
4.0 MGD
Continuous
Recordin�g
E or I
BOD, 5-day, 202C
334.4 lb/day
668.8 lb/day
Daily
Composite
E
Total Suspended Solids
1,302 lb/day
2,604 lb/day
Daily
Composite
E
COD
5,189 lb/day
10,378 lb/day
Weekly
Composite
E
Sulfides
13.6lb/day
27.3 lb/day
Monthly
Grab
E
Total Chromium
6.8 lb/day
13.6 lb/day
Monthly
Composite
E
Phenols
0.7lb/day
21.0 u /l
Monthly
Grab
E
NH3 as N
Monthly
Composite .
E
Total Residual Chlorine
Daily
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 ml
4001100 ml
I
Daily+
Grab
E, U+, D+
Temoerature2
Daily—,
Grab
E, U+, D+
Dissolved Oxygen
3/week+
Grab
U+, D+
Conductivity
3/week+
Grab
U+, D+
PHI
Daily
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen4
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus4
Monthly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
E
Footnotes:
1. Sample Locations: E- Effluent, I- Influent. U- Upstream at Cramerton Bridge, D- Downstream at Upper
Armstrong Bridge, + = Stream samples shall be grab samples, and instream sampling (U,D) shall be
conducted 3/Week during the months of June, July, August, and September, and 1 /Week during the
remaining months of the year.
2. The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the receiving
stream of more than 2.8°C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32°C.
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. See Part III, Condition F.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 4.7%; March, June, Sept. and December; See Part III, Condition E.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Fast Track Worksheet
'Case Number LV 02 I 083
Facility Name lAutomotive VWVTP
Permit Number INCO006033
Previous Case Statutory Maximun $25,000
in the Last es per violation
two years
Number of Assessments for previous 6 DMRs Total Assessment Factor =
• 1 0 Z 03 0 40 05 6 1.00 L
1.00 xit
Total
Number Number Penalty/ Assessment
Violations Assessed Parameter Violation Violation Factor Total Penalty
Percent of the Maximum Penalty
Authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A. 2.50
Comments
month = November 2001
repared by Richard Bridgeman

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Flestricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
MR DAVID YOUNG, TOWN MANAGER
TOWN OF CRAMERTON
155 NORTI MAIN STREET
CRAMERTON NC 28032 WQ
A.
❑ Agent
B. Received by ( Printed Name) � I C. Date of
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? L3-Ye:
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Service Type
El Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4 t V6 - 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
❑ Yes
?. Aj__ 7001 2;510 0005 0287. 64:59 ; „ ... •
3S Form,3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-01-M-25c

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
P 1v
First -Class Mail
m-- _Postage-& Fees Eaid
-- USPS-
.�_�_ ` Permit -No (a 10
• Sender: Please pri,VydurtriAm`6;)address, and_ZlP_
DENR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE NC 28111
„
.ay
omi
fa �tt�t��tt�[t a ��ft!��t t ttt ! ttl�tt�t�!t�t�ttttl��t�tt�!t�ti

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G.'Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 26, 2002
Mr. David Young, Town Manager
Town of Cramerton
155 North Main Street
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit'No. NC0006033
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Young:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on August 22, 2002 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office. The
operation and maintenance of the facility are commendable. Please inform the facility's Operator -in -
Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, -P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor .
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Gaston County Health Department
N. CCDE
N..C. Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
2•°` A s NPDES Compliance Inspection Report T:-X
wg
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources �.
�.�7-4, Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office NCDENR
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
Approval Expires
7/31/85
,:Section :A: National Data''$ stem'Codin
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NC0006033 02/08/22 C S 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA ...........Reserved............
3 3 N N
'Section 13: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
10:15
March 29, 2000
Town of Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
Exit Time:
Eagle Road, Cramerton
1:10
Permit Expiration Date:
Gaston County, North Carolina
Date:
September 30, 2001
02/08/22
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------Titles) Phone No(s):
Mr. Jamie Shytle / ORC / 704-825-7499
Mr. Eric Brackett / Operator/ 704-825-7499
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title:
Mr. M.D. Young
Town Manager
y
Town of Cramerton
Phone No.
Contacted?
155 North Main Street
704-824-4337
No
Cramerton, North Carolina 28032
'Section C:
Areas rEvaluated'.:Durin :Ins ection
Permit ® Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance, ❑ Sewer Overflow
® Records/Reports ® Self -Monitoring Program ® Sludge Handling/Disposal ❑ Pollution Prevention
® Facility Site Review ❑ Compliance Schedules ® Pretreatment Program ❑ Multimedia
® Effluent/Receiving Waters ® Laboratory ❑ Stormwater ❑ Other:
-Section.,D::Summary of-Yindings/Comments
See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Aquatic toxicity test results will be forwarded under separate cover when available.
Signature(s) of Inspector
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
r
John Lesle f
DENR-DWQ/MRO/[phone] FAX: [phone]
August 23, 2002
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office
Date:
.,Regulatory° Off ".Use,Only
Action Taken
Date:
Noncompliance
Compliance
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

Town of Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Page 2
John Lesley last inspected the facility on October 30, 2001.
Permit:
The permitted facility is a 4.0 MGD extended aeration wastewater treatment system
consisting of a mechanical bar screen, pH control, flow equalization basin with mechanical
aeration, aeration basin with mechanical aeration, dual secondary clarifiers, RAS pump station,
gas chlorine disinfection, chlorine contact chamber, aerobic digesters, sludge drying beds, sludge
belt press, and ultra sonic flow meter.
The renewed permit was issued on July 26, 2002 with an effective date of September 1,
2002. The permit expires on January 31, 2005.
Facility Site Review/Operations and Maintenance:
The facility is staffed by an ORC, who has a Grade IV Certification, and an appropriately
certified backup ORC. The WWTP is a former industrial facility with antiquated equipment.
The Town has plans to construct a biological -nutrient -removal (BNR) wastewater treatment
system at the site in two phases. The WWTP staff has been diligent in operating the facility to
achieve optimum treatment capabilities in spite of equipment problems. A process control
program (consisting of mixed liquor suspended solids, sludge depth, pH, settleable solids, and
dissolved oxygen measurements) is utilized daily at the facility.
The bar screen (designed to be a mechanical bar screen) is being cleaned manually. In
addition, the screen is designed as a "rough screen" used to catch large rags from the industrial
user and is insufficient for use in a domestic WWTP. The bar screen is to be replaced with a
more efficient type of screening device in phase I of the construction.
The platform aerators in the aeration basin have been replaced with floating mechanical
aerators to allow for better mixing and oxygen transfer in the basin. Sludge drying beds are used
for dewatering digested sludge. The facility has a belt press that is not in use (see the Sludge
Disposal Section of this report).
Records/Reports:
Records and reports consist of flow charts, monthly monitoring reports, laboratory
analysis reports, maintenance and operations logs, calibration logs, process control data, and an
ORC log. All records are maintained in accordance with NPDES Permit requirements.
Self -Monitoring Program:
Monthly monitoring reports were reviewed for the period July 2001 through June 2002.
One daily maximum sulfides limit violation was reported in November 2001 and one toxicity test
failure was reported in September 2001. Notices of violation were sent for the violations.
Samples are collected proportional to flow and maintained at <4°C during collection and
storage.

Town of Cramerton Eagle Road WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Page 3
Laboratory:
The on -site lab (Certificate No. 174) conducts pH, conductivity, and temperature
measurements and total suspended solids testing. PAR Labs (Certificate No. 020) performs
nutrients analyses and BOD, and fecal coliform testing. ETT Environmental conducts aquatic
toxicity testing. The on -site laboratory appeared to be spacious and well organized. Chet
Whiting of the Division's Laboratory Section conducted a Laboratory_ Certification Maintenance
Inspection on April 30, 2002.
Sludge Disposal:
Sludge -is dried on sludge drying beds and stored on site. The facility takes dried sludge
to the Gaston County Landfill for disposal as needed. The Town also holds Land Application
Permit No. WQ0002618 but has not land applied sludge.
Pretreatment Program:
The Town is the process of developing an approved Industrial Pretreatment Program.
The facility receives flow from one significant industrial user (SIU), Mastercraft Fabrics, LLC.
The Town's sewer use ordinance, industrial waste survey, short-term monitoring plan, and
headworks analysis have been approved by the Division. An.Industrial User Permit (1UP) has
been issued with interim limits for four months. An IUP compliance schedule is included based
upon proposed nutrient limits and construction of the BNR wastewater treatment system. The
SIU was inspected on October 25, 2001.
Effluent/Receiving Water:
The effluent discharge was brown -red in color with no visible suspended solids or foam.
The facility discharges to the South Fork Catawba River (7Q10 of 125.0, IWC = 4.7%).in the
Catawba River Basin (CTB36). The receiving stream was not evaluated.

WA7'
4Z Q .
�O G�
� r
-Michael.F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June-24, 2002
174
Mr. Jamie Shytle
Town of Cramerton/ Eagle Road WTTP
155 North Main St.
Cramerton, .NC 28032
SUBJECT: Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection
Dear Mr. Shytle:
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on April 30, 2002 by Mr. Chester
E. Whiting. Where deficiencies are cited in this report, a response is required as well as
for all lettered comments and/or recommendations. Within thirty days of receipt, please
supply this office with a written item for item description of how these deficiencies,
comments and/or recommendations were corrected. If the deficiencies cited in the
enclosed report. are not corrected, enforcement actions will- be recommended. For
certification maintenance, your laboratory must continue to carry out the requirements set
forth in 15A NCAC for 2H .0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from
this office. Thank you for your cooperation during the -inspection. Please contact us at
919-733-3908, if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
James W. Meyer
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc:. Chester E. Whiting
Mooresville Regional Office f/
GIMW
NCDENR .
Laboratory Section N. C. Division of Water Quality 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
[phone] Fax: [phone] Internet: dwglab.org Customer Service 1-800-623-7748

ON -SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Laboratory Name: City of Cramerton WWTP Lab
Laboratory Address:- 155 N: Main Street Cramerton, NC 28032
Laboratory Cert. Number: 174
Inspection Type: Maintenance
Inspection Date: April 30, 2002
Inspector(s): Chet Whiting
Local Contact Person(s): Mr. Thomas J. Shytle
I. INTRODUCTION:
The above named laboratory was inspected to verify compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for
the analysis of environmental samples.
II. OVERVIEW:
The laboratory was neat and well .organized. Laboratory personnel provided the inspector(s) with
all materials, and information requested for examination.
III. DEFICIENCIES, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
GENERAL LABORATORY:
A. COMMENT: It is strongly recommended that each bench sheet reference the appropriate
analytical procedure. For example : TSS Standard Methods 18t' Edition 2540 D, or TSS EPA
Method 160.2.
B. COMMENT: Thermometer calibrations were due at the time of the audit. Please submit a
copy with the response to this report.
FRCAL COLIFORM (MF):
C. COMMENT: No comparison test is conducted before 'a new lot of consumables are put into
use.
REQUIREMENT: It is required that when a new lot of culture medium, pads, or membrane
filters is to be used, a comparison of the current lot in use, (reference lot) against the new lot
(test lot), be made. As a minimum, make single analyses on five positive samples. Ref:
Standard Methods, 18th Edition - Method 9020 B.3d.(page 9-7)
1. DEFICIENCY: Residual chlorine check is not documented.

City of Cramerton Eagle Road facility Audit 2
REQUIREMENT: Document residual chlorine checks. If samples are positive for chlorine obtain
another sample. Ref: 15a NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) & (7) (A).
COMMENT: In order to avoid contamination this check may be performed at the time of analysis
using chlorine test strips. Do not. dip the test strip in the sample container, test a small amount if
the sample in the sample cap or other container.
COMMENT: It is strongly recommended that the laboratory analyze a culture positive as part
of the quality control procedure for this method. We recommend that at least one CP (Culture
Positive) be analyzed each week. The CP needs to produce distinct colonies of sufficient
number to allow proper monitoring of analytical criteria. If you have questions regarding this
procedure do not hesitate in contacting this office for assistance.
D. COMMENT (Stream): Additional sample volume(s) need to be analyzed to ensure the best
chance of.producing plates within the optimum counting range. Filtration ranges were
discussed at the audit that might help account for the wide variability of stream results.
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND:
COMMENT: This parameter is no longer required on the plants NPDES permit and the
laboratory discussed -discontinuing COD certification.
COMMENT: If the laboratory wishes to discontinue certification for this parameter, please
include a drop request in the response to this report. If however, the laboratory continues
certification for this parameter the following items must be addressed in the corrective action
response to this report:
• The internal curve of the spectrophotometer must be verified on an annual basis with at least
five points that bracket the expected sample concentration range. One of these standards
must be at the laboratories reporting limit. ,
• The temperature of the COD reactor must be documented each day it is used
• A second source standard (LCS) must be analyzed with each day samples are analyzed.
All of the above information must be documented.
RESIDUAL CHLORINE:
2. DEFICIENCY: The laboratory does not analyze a second source LCS each day samples are
analyzed.
REQUIREMENT: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (B) states in part: "analyze one known standard in
addition to calibration standards each day samples are analyzed to document accuracy".
COMMENT: The laboratory may purchase a known LCS, or prepare an LCS using a standard
from a different vendor, or a different lot number from the same vendor.

City of Cramerton Eagle Road facility Audit 3
DATA REVIEW:
The data review included data and DMRs for January,, February, and March 2002 as well as
supporting documentation and annual and quarterly requirements.
E. , COMMENT: Fecal Coliform March 21, 2002: 5 ml dilution 24 colonies, 10 ml dilution 43
colonies. 430 reported value. Both counts are within optimum range and an average value of
455 should have been reported. A similar minor counting error was observed on an upstream
sample 5 mis yielded 21 colonies, 10 mis yielded 46 colonies and 460 FCU/100mis was
reported. An average value of 440 should have been reported. Please review the counting
instructions issued by this office.
F. COMMENT: Conductivity Downstream March 13, 2002: 2 umhos/CM reported on the DMR.
Lab data indicates a value of 168 umhos/cm. Please amend and resubmit the DMR with the
correct result.
IV. CONCLUSION:
The laboratory does a good job overall. Generally deficiencies observed were minor and
infrequent. A few systematic errors were observed. Most of the deficiencies can be corrected by
fine tuning laboratory documentation. All deficiencies from the previous audit were corrected.
Laboratory personnel were professional and courteous throughout the audit process. Many
improvements in documentation were observed.
Correctingthe above cited deficiencies and comments and implementing the
recommendations will help this lab to produce quality data and meet certification requirements.
Please respond to all numbered deficiencies and lettered comments.
Report prepared by Chet Whiting June 4, 2002

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AUDIT
To improve our service to you and to maintain the quality of the laboratory inspection process, we request that you
complete the following evaluation. Since your comments are important to us, please use the reverse side of this
form to discuss issues not addressed in the items listed below. Please return this form within five (5) days of
this audit. Completing and returning this form is voluntary.
Please return this evaluation to:
James W. Meyer
EHNR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
4405 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607-6445
Certification Officer's Name: Chet Whiting
Inspection Date: April 30, 2002
r_i i _.... ..... � In ,.,+- —=I0 w4 a}, 1— n nnri 1 n= areal lank
ITEW
Disagree
Neutral
Agree,:
-`
1>23
45 6
789'10
i ; �y .,
contacted you ou in advance for your audit
1. The certification officerems. o
and answered your questions.
2. The certification officer arrived on time and at the agreed place.
3. The certification officer's dress and appearance were professional
and business like.
4. The certification officer's questions and comments were pertinent
to laboratory operations and inspection.
5. The certification officer interacted with your staff in a courteous
and professional manner.
6. The audit results were summarized in an exit interview following
the survey.
7. Correcting the deficiencies noted in the audit results will improve
your laboratory's operations and data quality.
B. The certification officer's comments have been/will be helpful to
your laboratory staff and laboratory operations.
9. The N.C. Environmental Laboratory Certification Program is
beneficial to your laboratory's analytical performance.
ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 10 (WITH 10 = EXCELLENT) PLEASE RATE NORTH CAROLINA'S ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY CERTIFICATION
PROGRAM
ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 10 (WITH 10 = EXCELLENT) PLEASE RATE your certification officer
Laboratory Name City of Cramerton Eagle Road facility
Date:
Signature( Optional)
PLEASE USE THE BACK OF THIS FORM FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE CONCERNING THIS PROGRAM OR THE
CERTIFICATION OFFICER.

1Y' State of North Carolina
-Department of Environment,
Healtp and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
y�yt� James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Pt
NA'l,UPAL REMOUxc-
March 10, 1997 MAR p, 1 1997
MR. JAMES DANSEY
COLLINS & AIKMAN PRODUCTS CO.
CRAMERTON AUTO PARTS, L.P. P;lsEe+ALE P,ii-fOA iL OHM
PO BOX 279
CRAMERTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28032 Subject: Application No. WQ0002618
Cramerton Auto.Products, L.P.
Name Change
Gaston County
Dear MR. DANSEY:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on March 10, 1997. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
Your project has been assigned to Randy Kepler for a detailed engineering review. Should there be any
questions concerning your project, the reviewer will contact you with a request for additional
1
information.
,eatware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
� U Ral Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the
_sDliNvvislon.
If you have any questions, please contact Randy Kepler at [phone] extension 544. If the
engineer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING
INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
S llins, P.E.
Supervisor, Permits & Engineering Unit
cc: M mre ,i � l e al�®1 �e '� _ 1+�115 t 5 A o�AM� CN ,� c1C . �i LCAS c Coin ►n C N -
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

DEM-P g E Fax:[phone] Feb 10 '9-e 1b:U6 r.ul�us
State of North Carolina IL
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Division of Water Quality .
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary. ED E H N Fot
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
WATER QUAuxy SECTION
pERMTT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE EQBM—
ATIOhL-
permit Number. NC/ W/A/ D '0
1. Permit holder's name
2. Permit's signing official's name and title: C' Lee, Ms Y. W G l 1
(Person legally responsible for permit)
(Title)
-t o, -6a7R city: C- Mew 4ari
s. Mailing address. �
state:' N C. zip Code: a ga3 phone: c7oY) gas- 7<D 5
II. NE iN DWNER/NAM INFO M� A'I'lOW
1. - This request for a name change is a result of -
a. Change in ownership of property/company
b. Name change only
c. Other (please explain)
2_ New owner's Warne (name to be put on permit): CD► i nS '�'►' k wl an
3. New owner's or sighing official's name and title: Chess IMF x ll
(Person legally rnesponnsible forpermit)
(Title)
4. Mailing address: o, 1OX arli city C
g
Sb+� N C Zip Code:. 211D 32 Phone: (r10`i Sas- so.S
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2-7626.OM Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled./ lo% Post -consumer. paper
a M.
O R'
rn
G
CD—
" WZV-6 VL
A" vm iive-

DEM-P 8 E Fax:[phone] Feb 10 '97 16:08 P.03/03
PERM NAME / 4WNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
THIS APPLICATION PACKAGE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
UNLESS ALL OF THE APPLICABLE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE TNCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL
REQLJIRED ITEMS:
1. This completed application
2. Processing fee of $100.00 .(Checks to be made payable to DEHNR) ., .
3. Legal documentation of the transfer of.ownership.(such.as a contract, deed, articles of
incorporation)
Certification must be completed and signed by both the current permit holder and the
and
new applicant in the case of change of ownership change.
sign the application certification.
Current Permittee's Certification:
I attest -that this. application for
name/ownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not
completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application_ package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature: Date:
Applicant's Certification:
I `ti �� .t attest that this application for a
namef o ership a has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that if all requir parts of this application are not
completed and that if all required suppo information and attachments are not
included;. this application pe wil fumed as :incomplete.
� ���✓ice —
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION & MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDDRESS:
NC DEHNR, Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Permits and Engineering Unit
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-6335

0161718.05
EQUITY.PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is
made and entered into as of August 28, 1996, by and among JPSGP
INC., a Delaware corporation ("JPSGP"), FOAMEX-JPS AUTOMOTIVE
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("FJPS" and, together with
JPSGP, "Sellers"), and COLLINS & AIKMAN PRODUCTS CO., a Delaware
corporation '("Purchaser").
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
WHEREAS, JPSGP owns a to general partnership interest
(the "GP Interest") in JPS Automotive L.P. (the "Company");
WHEREAS, FJPS owns a 990 limited partnership interest
in the Company (the "LP Interest" and, together with the GP
Interest, the "Equity"); and
WHEREAS, Purchaser desires to purchase the Equity from
Sellers, and Sellers desire to sell the Equity to Purchaser, in
each case upon the terms and subject to the conditionsset forth
in this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DEFINITIONS
Section I.I. Definitions. In addition to the terms
defined elsewhere herein, the terms defined in the introductory
paragraph and the Recitals to this Agreement shall have the
respective meanings specified therein, and the following terms
shall have the meanings specified below when used herein with
initial capital letters:
"Adjusted Net Assets" means as of any date the excess
of the total assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries
(excluding cash and cash equivalents) over the total
liabilities of the Company and its Subsidiaries (excluding
Indebtedness) and minority interests as reflected in a
balance sheet prepared in accordance with this Agreement.
In calculating Closing Date Adjusted Net Assets, there shall
be no reduction in "Minority Interest" for any distributions
made to the minority partner in Cramerton since the Interim
Balance Sheet Date with respect to the amount of taxes paid
or to be paid by such partner on account of the income of
Cramerton.
"Adjustment Report" has the meaning set forth in
Section 2.3 (a) .

0161718.05
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Sellers and Purchaser have executed
and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first written
above.
SELLERS: FOAMEX-JPS AUTOMOTIVE L.P.
BY: FJGP, Inc.
Its: General Partner
BY: /s/ Philip N. Smith, Jr. _
Name: . Philip N. Smith, Jr.
Title: Vice President
JPSGP INC.
BY: /s/ Philip'N. Smith, Jr. _
Name: Philip N. Smith, Jr.
Title: Vice President
GUARANTOR: FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
pursuant to Article XIII.
BY: /s/ Philip N. Smith, Jr. _
Name:, Philip N. Smith, Jr.
Title: Vice President
PURCHASER: COLLINS & AIKMAN PRODUCTS CO.
BY:_/s/ David A. Stockman
Name: David A. Stockman
Title: Co -Chairman of the Board
- 67 =

0161718.05
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS .......................................... 1
Section 1.1. Definitions....................................1
Section 1.2. Accounting Terms and Determinations ...........11
ARTICLE II. SALE AND PURCHASE .................................. 11
Section 2.1. Agreement to Sell and to Purchase .............11
Section 2.2. Purchase and Sale of Equity ...................11
Section 2.3. Purchase Price Adjustment .....................12
ARTICLE III. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLERS ........ 15
Section 3.1. Authority of Sellers ..........................15
Section 3.2. Organization of the Company ................... 15
Section 3.3. Capitalization of the Company; Title to the
Equity.................... ..................16
Section 3.4. No Conflict or Violation; Consents ...:........16
Section 3.5. Subsidiaries and Investments ..................17
Section 3.6. Financial Statements; Closing Date Liability
toSellers. .... ............................18
Section 3.7. Undisclosed Liabilities ..................19
Section 3.8. Accounts Receivable ...........................19
Section 3.9. Inventory.....................................19
Section 3.10. Material Adverse Effect ........20
Section 3.11. Real Property................................20
Section 3.12. Condition and Compliance of Property .........21
Section 3.13. Compliance with Laws .............21
Section 3.14. Affiliate Agreements and Liabilities .........22
Section 3.15. Contracts....................................22
Section 3.16. Intellectual Property ........................23
Section 3.17. Labor Relations..............................24
Section 3.18. Employee Benefits ......24
Section 3.19. Insurance....................................26
Section 3.20. Litigation...................................27
Section 3.21. Environmental Matters ........................27
Section 3.22. Tax Matters..................................28
Section 3.23. Interim Operations ...........................30
Section 3.24. Brokers......................................31
Section.3.25. Product Liability ........... ................31
Section 3.2.6. SEC Reports ..............31
Section 3.27. Books and Records of the Company .............32
Section 3.28. 1994'Acquisition Agreement ........ .........32
Section 3.29. No Material Misstatements ....................32
Section'3.30. Certain Matters Regarding the Senior Notes ...32
Section 3.31. No Seiren Right of First Refusal .............33
Section 3.32,. Disclaimer of Additional Representations
and Warranties; Schedules .....................33
ARTICLE IV. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF -PURCHASER .......33
Section 4.1. Authority of Purchaser ........................33
- i -

0161718.05
Section
4.2.
No Conflict or Violation ......................34
Section
4.3.
Litigation .......................... .........34
Section
4.4.
Brokers.......................................34
Section
4.5..
Investment Intent; Status ......................
35
Section
4.6.
Disclaimer of Additional Representations and
Warranties...................................35
ARTICLE V.
CERTAIN COVENANTS OF SELLERS .......................35
Section
5.1.
Conduct of Business ...........................35
Section
5.2.
Information and Access ........................
37
Section
5.3.
Confidentiality Agreements ....................
37
Section
5.4.
Certain Environmental Covenants ...............37
ARTICLE VI. CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS..................38
Section
6.1.
Hart-Scott-Rodino and Other Filings ...........38
Section
6.2.
Transfer Taxes.................................38
Section
6.3.
Obligation.to File Tax Returns ................39
Section
6.4.
Certain Provisions Relating to Consents .......39
Section
6.5.
Nondisclosure; Noncompetition ..................39
Section
6.6.
Efforts..................................... ....
41
Section
6.7.
Ongoing Tax.Cooperation ................... ..41
Section
6.8.
Certain Agreements ............................42
Section
6.9.
Clearance Certificates ........................42
Section
6.10.
Control of Tax Audits ........................42
Section
6.11.
Tax Sharing Agreements and Arrangements ......43
Section
6.12.
Sale of Assets for Tax Purposes . .............43
Section
6.13.
Certain Matters Relating to Enhanced
Severance . ...................................
45
Section
6.14.
Ongoing Insurance Cooperation ................46
Section
6.15.
Cramerton Tax Distribution ...................47
ARTICLE VII. CONDITIONS TO SELLERS' OBLIGATIONS ........... :...
47
Section
7.1.
Representations and Warranties ................47
Section
7.2.
Compliance with Agreement .....................48
Section
7.3.
No Adverse Proceeding .........................48
Section
7.4.
Hart-Scott-Rodino .............................48
Section
7.5.
Consents......................................48
Section
7.6.
Corporate Documents .................... ......48
Section
7.7.
Certain Agreements ............................48
Section
7.8.
Discount Debentures Change of Control Put ......48
Section
7.9.
Opinion of Counsel- ............................49
ARTICLE VIII.
CONDITIONS TO PURCHASER'S OBLIGATIONS ...........
49
Section
8.1.
Representations and Warranties ................49
Section
8.2.
Compliance with Agreement ..................49
Section
8.3.
No Adverse Proceeding ............... ........49
Section
8.4.
Hart-Scott-Rodino .............................
49
Section
8.5.
Consents ......................................
49
Section
8.6.
Corporate Documents ...........................49
Section
8.7.
FIRPTA........................................50
Section
8.8.
Cramerton ...................................50
Section
8.9.
Purchaser Bank Consent ........................50

0161718.05
Section
8.10.
' Section
8.11.
Section
8.12.
Section
8.13.
Financing of Senior Note Change of Control
Put..........................................50
Certain Agreements ...........................50
Material Adverse Effect ......................50
Opinion of Counsel ............50
ARTICLE IX. THE CLOSING; TERMINATION ..........................50
f Section 9.1. The Closing...................................50
f Section 9.2. Deliveries by Sellers at the Closing ..........51
Section 9.3. Deliveries by Purchaser at the Closing ........51
' Section 9.4. Termination 51
i
ARTICLE X. INDEMNIFICATION....................................52
Section 10.1. Survival......................................52
Section 10.2. Indemnification Provisions for Benefit of
I Purchaser .......... .........................52
Section 10.3. 'Indemnification Provisions for Benefit of
Sellers......................................55
Section 10.4. Tax Indemnity..............................55
Section 10.5. Matters Involving Third Parties .......56
Section 10.6. Certain Limitations on Environmental
Indemnification..............................57
Section 10.7. Certain Additional Provisions Relating to
Indemnification..............................59
Section 10.8. Certain Litigation Matters ................... 6C
ARTICLE XI. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ........ 61
Section 11.1. Employees....................................61
ARTICLE XII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS .........................61
Section 12.1. Notices ...................................... 61
Section 12.2. Amendments...................................62
Section 12.3. Assignment and Parties in Interest ........... 62
Section 12.4. Announcements.................................63
Section 12.5. Expenses.....................................63
Section 12.6. Entire Agreement .............................63
' Section 12.7. Descriptive Headings 64
i Section 12.8. Counterparts ..................
64
Section 12.9. Governing Law; Jurisdiction .................. 64
Section 12:10. Construction................................64
Section 12.11. Severability ........................... 65
Section 12.12.. Specific Performance ........................ 65
ARTICLE XIII. FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC. GUARANTY .............. 65
Section
13.1.
Guaranty. ......................................
65
Section
13.2.
Nature of Guaranty ...........................
65
Section
13.3.
Limitation on Guaranty .......................66
Section
13.4.
Authority of Guarantor .......................
66

0161718.05
SCHEDULE
NUMBER SCHEDULE NAME
1.1
Certain Officers
1.2
Permitted Liens
2.3
Base Line Adjusted Net Assets
3.2
Certificate and Partnership Agreement
3.3
Capitalization
3.4
Conflicts or Violations
3.5
Subsidiaries
3.6(a)
Financial Statements
3.6(b)
Interim Financial Statements
3.6(e)
Warranty Reserve
3.7
Undisclosed"Liabilities
3.10
Material Adverse Effect
3.11(a)
Owned Real Property
3.11(b)
Lease Obligations
3.12(a)
Personal Property; Liens
3.12(b)
Leased Personal Property
3.13(a)
Compliance with Laws
3.13 (b)
Permits
3.14
Affiliate Agreements"
3.15
Contracts
3.16
Intellectual Property
3.17
Collective Bargaining Agreements
3.18
Employee Benefit Plans
3.19
Insurance
3.20
Litigation
3.21
Environmental Matters
3.22
Tax Matters
3.23
Interim Operations
3.25
Products Liability
5.1
Interim Operations
6.8
Certain Agreements
6.13
Certain Employees
8.5
Required Consents
8.8
Terms of Cramerton Contract
EXHIBIT EXHIBIT NAME
A' Terms of SMT License Agreement
B Terms of Cramerton Supply Agreement
C Form of,Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue Opinion
D Form of Willkie Farr & Gallagher Opinion
E Intentionally Omitted
F Form of Amendments to Partnership Agreement
G Form of FIRPTA Certificate
- iv -

Ca Collins & Aikman
Collins & Aikman Products Co.
701 McCullough Drive
February 10, 1997 P.O. Box 32665
Writer's Direct Dial:
Charlotte, NC 28232
[phone]
[phone]
Ms. Coleen H. Sullins
Supervisor, Permits and Engineering Branch
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
J rn
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535M
o . $?a
Subject: Cramerton Automotive Products L.P., Cramerton Plant
.o= rimer''
Land Application Program Permit WQ 0002618
3 � � CZ)2 _
Change.of Ownership Notification
o c
Dear Ms. Sullins:
This letter is to serve as official notification that Collins & Aikman Products Co. of ,
Charlotte, North Carolina is now the owner and operator of the Cramerton Automotive Products
L.P. facility in Cramerton, North Carolina. Attached 'is a completed Permit Name/Ownership
Change Form and supporting documents to verify this change.
If you have any questions or need further information; please contact me at your
convenience either by phone or a -mail me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
& AII�IVIAN DUCTS CO.
L an 7a ewart
COLLINSnvironmental Engineer
cc: B. Kaufman - Cramerton
C. Maxwell - Cramerton
C. Moore - SSD

mom
State. of fl arolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Kwoaw�
[DFEE HNR
February 24, 1997
MR LYMAN JAY STEWART
COLLINS & AIKMAN PRODUCTS COMPANY
701 MCCULLOUGH DRIVE Subject: Return of Incomplete Application
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28232 Cramerton Automotive Sludge
Sludge -Land Application
Gaston County
Dear MR STEWART: %0
In accordance with Division policy, the enclosed application package, which was received on m
February 14, 1997, is being returned as incomplete. =0
PLEASE NOTE THE ITEMS CHECKED (J) BELOW MUST BE CORRECTED c�
• -TWO sets of plans/specifications signed and sealed by an N.C. Professional Engineer'ff
submitted for sewers. FIVE sets required for spray, sludge,. recycle and groundwater.::'
• -Two copies of all required supporting material. CD
o
ri -Appropately completed and signed application form plus one copy.
-Letter from current permit holder requesting name change.
-A recent letter of flow acceptance (SPECIFYING FLOW) or copy of Agreement from
owner of receiving treatment facility. This letter must be included in package when
re -submitted.
-Operational Agreement for sewers owned by individual residents, a homeowners
association, or a developer.
-Permit application processing fee of $.. Fee must be included with package for
completeness.
-OTHER ITEMS:.
FEE: No fee was found in package. Please resubmittwith $100.00 name change fee
stapled to application. -
After all required submittal information has been obtained, the completed application package may be
resubmitted in accordance with the submittal instructions included on the application form. Be sure to
submit all originally submitted information (and copies) along with the required additional information.
If you have any questions, please contact Michael Allen at [phone], ext. 527.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
SERG Return File
Sincerely,
oleen . Sullins, PE, Supervisor
Permits & Engineering Unit
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX 919-733=9919
An Equal. Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer -