20190866 Ver 1_MP (DRAFT)_2021_20210208

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190866 Version* 1
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 02/08/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -2/8/2021
....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
I•J Stream r Wetlands r Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matthew Reid [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20190866 Version:*1
Existing IDI# Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Huntsman
County: Wilkes
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Huntsman_100123_MP(DRAFT)_2021.pdf 28.07MB
Rease upload only one R7F of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:*

-."721111111
MITIGATION PLAN HUNTSMAN MITIGATION SITE
Wilkes County, NC
Draft for I RT Review
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040102
February 2, 2021
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2019-00836
NCDWR ID No. 20190866
NCDEQ Contract No. 7891
RFP#: 16-007728(Issued: 11/13/2018)
DMS ID No. 100123
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
It?
WILDLAN1)-
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
This mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section §332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory
mitigation.
Contributing Staff:
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM Project Manager Aaron Earley, PE, CFM,Stream and BMP Design
Shawn Wilkerson, Principal in Charge Haley Cook, Designer
Ian Eckardt, PWS, Wetland Delineations Jesse Kelley, Construction Documents
Christine Blackwelder, Mitigation Plan Development Emily Reinicker, PE, CFM, Lead Quality Assurance

1111‘ 11411P
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
February 2, 2021
Mr. Matthew Reid
NCDEQ—Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone] Mobile
Subject: Draft Mitigation Plan Comments for the
Huntsman Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin—CU#03040102
Wilkes County
DMS Project ID No. 100123
Contract#7891
Dear Mr. Reid:
Thank you for your December 17, 2020 comment letter for the Huntsman Mitigation Site draft mitigation report
and plans. We have made the necessary revisions to the draft documents and we are submitting revised
versions of the documents along with this letter. Below we provide your comments followed by our responses
in bold italics.
MITIGATION REPORT TEXT
1. General:
• Recent IRT comments have requested providers ensure that when measuring the centerline of the
channel for crediting purposes that only one channel is measured at the confluence. Please verify that
this was considered when calculating stream length and assets. Please revise report,tables and plans as
necessary.
o Measurements on tributaries to North Little Hunting Creek stop at the toe of slope of the
receiving stream, and the centerline was used for crediting. The report, tables, and plans
display correct lengths and stationing.
• The IRT has requested recently that a figure noting the different planting zones be included in the
mitigation plan. Please consider adding this figure to the Figures section of the appendix and reference
in Section 6.7.
o The planting plan is very straightforward for this project and we have asked the IRT to refer to
the plans on past comment response rounds to minimize duplicated information in our
submittals. We have not provided an additional Figure at this time but can add it if the IRT
requires it for their review.
2. Title Page:
• Please include the DWR project number if available.
o The DWR project number is now included on the title page.
• Please also include the RFP#and the date of issuance: RFP#: 16-007728 (Issued: 11/13/2018)
o The RFP#and date of issuance is now included on the title page.

3. Table of Contents:
• Figure 3 and Figure 4 have inadvertently been reversed in the table of contents
o Table of contents has been updated and document reviewed for consistency.
• Appendix 3 DWR, NCSAM and NCWAM Identification Forms: There were no NCWAM forms
included in the draft. Please update.
o Appendix 3's title has been updated throughout the report.
4. Table 2:
• Please include the stream thermal regime (warm) in the summary table. DMS acknowledges that this is a
variance from the current table template.
o The stream thermal regime has been added to Table 2 in the report and the required tables in
the digital submittal.
5. 3.3.2 Existing Wetlands:
• This section indicates that the PJD package that was submitted in September 2020 is located in
Appendix 2.The submitted PJD package did not make it into the draft mit plan. Please be sure to include
in the final submittal. In the future, please go ahead and include the package that was submitted in the
draft report even if it is still under review.
o The p.ID was approved on February 2, 2021 and is now included in Appendix 2. Please note
that proposed intermittent streams UT1A and the intermittent portion of Old Bus Branch were
determined to be ephemeral during the review and are now excluded from the project.
6. 4.3 401/404:
• As discussed in this section, please update plans to show safety fence around wetlands.
o Safety fence is now shown around undisturbed wetland areas and designated tree saves.
7. Table 12:
• Table does not include UT2 Reach 4.
o We have added Reach 4 to UT2 Reach 3 in the table. Reach 3 and Reach 4 have the same
stressors and impairments and will be restored. The reaches were broken out due to a change
in stream and valley slope.
• Please add BMP installation to the mitigation activities for appropriate reaches.
o BMP installation has been added to the mitigation activities on Old Bus Branch and Rifle
Tributary.
• UT2 Reach 1 is listed as Ell, but the measures described for restoration are identical to this. Is this
description for this reach's mitigation actions correct?
o The Mitigation Activities description has been modified to note that restoration activities are
only proposed on a portion of the reach. This work was discussed during the IRT site walk and
supports the 2.5:1 credit ratio.
8. Tables 14 and 15:
• Does WEI have an explanation for the Max Q calculated using Manning's equation being so much larger
than the other estimates?
o This calculation uses the cross-sectional area at the existing low bank elevation and the
existing stream slope to determine the approximate flow the existing stream channel conveys
before a floodplain is engaged. Wildlands uses this calculation as an upper limit for possible
bankfull discharge values. Onsite streams are incised, which is why the maximum discharge
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S.Mint Street,#104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

conveyed in the existing channels is much higher than the proposed design. We have renamed
this row, "Max Q-Existing Site Streams, top of low bank". Please also note that we discovered
an erroneous cell reference in our mitigation table excel file, and these numbers have now
been updated to match those represented on Figure 7.
9. 6.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters:
• Text indicates that design morphologic parameters were developed for each of the El and restoration
reaches.There are no El reaches for this project. Please update.
o Text has been updated.
10. 6.5 Sediment Transport Analysis:
• WEI states that the sediment supply and sources were evaluated, but no explanation is provided. Please
state the fine and course sediment sources. Is there a fine and course sediment supply from upstream
North Little Hunting Creek?Additionally, given the statement "...and in most cases,transport sediment
larger than delivered by the watershed",what are the implications of the stream moving larger cobble?
Under what flow conditions would this transport occur?
o A description of sediment supply and sources has been added to the mitigation report.
• The discussion surrounding the sediment transport analysis was somewhat limited. Based on Table 22,
the excess shear for UT2 R2 and R3, Barn Branch and Old Bus Branch seems high.The structures to deal
with this were not evident on the plan sheets for some of these reaches.
o Rock Cascades with Pools hatching has been darkened on the plans and index. Rock Cascades
with Pools are designed for areas of high shear on UT2 R2, Barn Branch, and Old Bus Branch as
designated by the hatching and proposed profile.See Detail 3,Sheet 6.4 for additional details.
Riffle types are not labeled until final plans, but chunky riffles and woody riffles will be used to
manage anticipated excess shear on UT2 R3 in addition to the structures shown.
11. 6.6 Stream Design Implementation:
• Please briefly describe how WEI will construct the Priority 2 sections. Will topsoil be stockpiled?
Minimum bench width and side slopes? Since establishment of vegetative cover and vigor can be a
challenge on Priority 2 banks and benches, please include a discussion on how the soil restoration will
be addressed during construction and reference potential adaptive management.
o Additional discussion of Priority 2 design and construction is now included in Section 6.6.
12. 6.6.1 North Little Hunting Creek:
• Consider including discussion of drain tile system removal detailed on the plan sheets.
o Additional discussion about the drain tile removal has been added to Section 6.6.1.
13. 6.6.2 UT1:
• Please describe the pond removal in more detail. Will WEI excavate and remove existing material and
bring in suitable fill for the channel work?
o Additional detail about pond removals is now included in this section. Wildlands will over-
excavate unsuitable material and import fill if needed.
• Confinement seems very high around the poultry houses. Will there be cutting into the valley wall?Are
there any drainage concerns to UT1 from the poultry houses?
o The poultry houses and the landowner required offset created a design boundary, as did the
desire to connect the existing valley bottom elevation upstream of the poultry houses, and the
approximate elevation of the bottom of Pond 3. Recreating the valley away from the poultry
house requires a lot of excavation and the right valley wall will be graded. The typical riffle
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S.Mint Street,#104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

section on this stretch of UT1 is 5.7'wide, which will produce an entrenchment ratio greater
than 8, so the design is unconfined.
o There are no concerns about drainage from the decommissioned poultry houses to UT1.
• Please verify the condition of the existing culvert to remain on UT1 Reach 2. Is the culvert sized
appropriately, perched or does it impede aquatic passage?
o The existing culvert is in good condition and sized appropriately but has a grated inlet and a
perched outlet, restricting aquatic passage. This information has been added to Section 3.3.1.
Post-construction design will replace the grated inlet with a headwall, stabilize the culvert
outlet and raise the stream invert to allow fish passage as outlined in Section 6.6.2.
• It was noted in the post contract site visit meeting minutes that revising the culvert and drop structure
was not part of the restoration plan. It was unclear if the structure was within the DOT right of way. It
was also unclear where the culvert flow was coming from. Can you please include additional information
in the report regarding this culvert/drop structure?There was also very little information in the draft
plan set regarding how this would be constructed. Please include this information including details in the
revised submittal. In future draft mitigation plans, please include culvert replacement information with
the draft submittal.
o The survey revealed that the drop inlet structure is outside the right-of-way and within the
project limits. Wildlands met with DOT to discuss the area and determined that removing the
drop inlet, installing a headwall, and stabilizing the culvert outlet is the best design for the
system. Wildlands purchased a portion of the adjoining parcel to the east to gain additional
easement area to complete the work and will work with DOT to obtain necessary
encroachment agreements. This information is now provided in Section 6.6.2 and culvert
details are provided in the plan set.
14. Storm Water BMPs:
• Are the two proposed BMPs designed to be maintenance free. Does WEI anticipate any long term
maintenance issues or risks associated with the BMPs?
o The BMPs are designed to be maintenance free once vegetation establishes. The BMPs will
mimic natural structures that encourage sedimentation or vegetated filtration before water
enters the stream. No long-term risks are expected.
• There is a detail provided for the proposed BMP on Rifle Trib, but there is not a detail for the proposed
BMP on Old Bus Branch. Please provide a detail with the revised draft.
o The BMP detail for the Step-Pool Stormwater Conveyance on Old Bus Branch and Rifle
Tributary has been added to the plan set.See Detail 3,Sheet 6.7.
15. 6.7 Vegetation, Planting Plan and Land Management:
• Consider adding a wetland planting zone for the existing wetlands within the conservation easement.
o We have modified the buffer planting zone plant list to include an asterisk on plants which
should be used in wetter portions of the site. Please see the planting list in Chapter 4 of the
plans.
• How will soil preparation be conducted in potentially compacted pasture areas outside of the active
grading zone?
o A note has been added to state that compacted areas proposed for bare root planting that are
not disturbed by construction will be subsoil plowed prior to planting.
16. 6.8 Utilities,Stream Crossings, and Site Access:
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S.Mint Street,#104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

• Report discusses 5 strand barbed wire or charged high tensile wire for the culvert crossings.What type
of fencing will be used on the remainder of the site? Maintenance of the fence will also be the
responsibility of the landowner once project is closed and transferred to stewardship.
o The landowner will install the fence and has stated he will install electrified high tensile within
the North Little Hunting Creek floodplain and woven wire with a strand of barbed on other
reaches. Section 6.8 now discusses the various types of fencing proposed and that fence
maintenance is the landowner's responsibility.
17. 6.9 Project Risk Management:
• Please also describe the site specific conservation easement markings to prevent encroachment.
o A statement about easement marking post-construction is now included in Section 6.9.
18. 7.0 Performance Standards/8.0 Monitoring Plan:
• Please consider utilizing the most recent DMS templates and guidance for the as-built survey, record
drawings, and MYO-MY7 reports.These templates and guidance were updated in October 2020 and are
available on the DMS website.
o Since the project was contracted prior to the release of the new guidance, our budgets were
developed using the NC DMS June 2017 guidance documents. Wildlands'monitoring teams
are in the process of assessing the new templates and we will consider using them if we
determine we can do so and stay within our budgets. We have left the reference to the June
2017 templates and guidance in the report at this time.
19. Table 24:
• Is the absence of mid-channel bars through visual assessment an actual performance criterion?Would
not recommend explicitly specifying this unless necessary. Given assertions about sediment supply and
the shear,this should not be a concern anyway.
o The mid-channel bar performance standard has been removed from the table.
20. 9.0 Monitoring Plan and Figure 9:
• Per recent IRT guidance, please be sure to include photo points at culverts and crossings in the
monitoring plan.
o Photo points are now shown on Figure 9 at all culverts and crossings.
• Table 26: UT1 Reach 3 shows 1 riffle XS and 0 pool XS in the table, but Figure 9 shows 2 XS. Please verify
and update.
o Figure 9 has been adjusted.
21. 11.0 Determination of Credit:
• DMS would like to thank WEI for the restrictive covenant that will exclude cattle from a linear
ditch/wetland feature. Can you elaborate more on this covenant? Is it primarily additional fencing?
o The restrictive covenant prohibits cattle access in perpetuity, except in the event or an
emergency or shortage of all other water sources and access is need for the survival of the
livestock. The exact restrictive covenant language is in review with the property owner and
will be presented on the plat.
22. Figure 2:
• Please include location of the DWR stream form assessments on the existing conditions map.
o DWR stream form assessment locations are now included on Figure 2.
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S.Mint Street,#104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

23. Figure 7:
• Legend shows three Power(Reference Reach Curve) entries. Please revise as necessary.
o Figure 7 has been updated.
24. Figure 9:
• Please show fencing and include gate locations if known.
o Fencing is now depicted on Figure 9.
25. Appendix 4: Cross-section Plots:
• Please denote the point used as low top of bank or verify that bankfull line is shown correctly on XS
plots.
o The low top of bank is now shown on riffle cross sections. Bankfull lines were verified and no
changes were made.
26. Preliminary Design Plans:
• Please include culvert details in revised draft. Members of the IRT would appreciate reviewing this
information at the draft stage.
o Preliminary headwall details are now provided on Sheet 6.6 of the plans.
• Please include details for the headwall/endwall on UT1.
o The headwall detail is now provided on Sheet 6.13 of the plans.
• Please include fencing plan and detail. Please include gate locations if known.
o Overview Fencing Plan and details have been included on Sheet 7.0 of the plans and are also
provided on Figure 9 of the report, as requested. Gate locations have not yet been finalized.
• Planting Plan: Please consider including the wetland indicator status on planting tables. Also, based on
recent comments,the IRT would like to see the planting list included within the Mitigation Plan.
o The wetland indicator status is now provided on Sheet 4.0 of the plans. We have not provided
lists in the Mitigation Plan at this time, as we try to minimize duplicated information, but can
add it if the IRT requires it.
Please contact me at 704-332-7754 extension 100 if you have any questions.
Thank you,
(9)--/-1A).� �-t_—�
Shawn Wilkerson
President
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S.Mint Street,#104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Basin Characterization and Site Selection 1
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions 2
3.1 Watershed Conditions 2
3.2 Landscape Characteristics 3
3.3 Project Resources 5
3.3.1 Existing Streams 5
3.3.2 Existing Wetlands 11
3.4 Overall Functional Uplift Potential 12
3.5 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift 12
4.0 Regulatory Considerations 13
4.1 Biological and Cultural Resources 13
4.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass 13
4.3 401/404 14
5.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives 14
6.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan 15
6.1 Design Approach Overview 15
6.2 Reference Streams 17
6.3 Design Discharge Analysis 18
6.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters 20
6.5 Sediment Transport Analysis 25
6.6 Stream Design Implementation 27
6.6.1 North Little Hunting Creek 28
6.6.2 UT1 28
6.6.3 UT2 29
6.6.4 Barn Branch 29
6.6.5 Old Bus Branch 29
6.6.6 Rifle and Trapper Tributary 30
6.7 Vegetation, Planting Plan, and Land Management 30
6.8 Utilities, Stream Crossings, and Site Access 30
6.9 Project Risk and Uncertainties 31
7.0 Performance Standards 32
8.0 Long-Term Management Plan 32
9.0 Monitoring Plan 33
10.0 Adaptive Management Plan 36
11.0 Determination of Credits 36
12.0 References 38
TABLES
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1 1
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2 3
Table 3: Project Soil Types 4
Table 4: North Little Hunting Creek Attribute Table 6
Table 5: UT1 Attribute Table 7
Table 6: UT2 Attribute Table 8
Table 7: Barn Branch Attribute Table 9
Table 8: Old Bus Branch Attribute Table 10

Table 9:Trapper Tributary and Rifle Tributary Attribute Table 11
Table 10: Regulatory Considerations Attribute Table 13
Table 11: Mitigation Goals and Objectives 14
Table 12: Stream Stressors and Restoration Approach 16
Table 13: Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters 17
Table 14: Summary of Design Bankfull Discharge Analysis 19
Table 15: Summary of Design Bankfull Discharge Analysis 19
Table 16: Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for North Little Hunting Creek and UT2 Reach 420
Table 17: Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT1 Reach 1 21
Table 18: Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT1 Reach 2 and 3 22
Table 19: Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT2 Reach 2 and Barn Branch 23
Table 20: Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT2 Reach 3 24
Table 21: Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for Old Bus Branch 25
Table 22: Results of Competence Analysis 27
Table 23: Crossings Summary 31
Table 24: Summary of Performance Standards 32
Table 25: Long-term Management Plan 33
Table 26: Monitoring Components 34
Table 27: Monitoring Components 35
Table 28: Project Asset Table 37
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4 Watershed Map
Figure 5 Soils Map
Figure 6 Reference Reach Map
Figure 7 Design Discharge Analysis
Figure 8 Concept Map
Figure 9 Monitoring Components Map
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Historic Aerial Photos
Appendix 2 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix 3 DWR and NCSAM Identification Forms
Appendix 4 Supplementary Design Information
Appendix 5 Categorical Exclusion Checklist and Summary
Appendix 6 NCIRT Communications
Appendix 7 Invasive Species Treatment Plan
Appendix 8 Site Protection Instrument
Appendix 9 Maintenance Plan
Appendix 10 Financial Assurance
Appendix 11 Credit Calculations and Release Schedule
Appendix 12 Preliminary Plans

1.0 Introduction
The Huntsman Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Wilkes County approximately 5 miles south of Ronda
and 8 miles southwest of Jonesville (Figure 1).The Site is located within the North Little Hunting Creek
targeted local watershed (TLW) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040102020030 and will provide warm
stream credits in the South Yadkin 03040102 (Yadkin 02) Cataloging Unit (CU).
The Site is in agriculture and is bisected by Ingle Hollow Road. Site streams, as presented in Figure 2, are
in various stages of degradation due to the existing agricultural land.The project will restore and
enhance 4,945 existing linear feet of streams and will treat concentrated agricultural runoff with best
management practices (BMPs). An 18.4-acre conservation easement will protect the Site in perpetuity
and the work will generate 5,817.598 warm stream credits in the Yadkin River basin.The Site Protection
Instrument detailing the terms and restrictions of the conservation easement is in Appendix 1.
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1
Project Information
Project Name Huntsman Mitigation Site
County Wilkes
Project Area(acres) 18.4
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 36°8'26.48"N 80°55'55.88"W
Planted Acreage(acres of woody stems planted) 16.8
2.0 Basin Characterization and Site Selection
The Yadkin 02 river basin is rural and dominated by forest (49%) and agriculture (42%),with only 9%of
the land developed. In general, stream degradation and water quality issues within the Yadkin 02 are
primarily linked to agricultural stressors.
Several North Carolina agencies have conservation and watershed planning documents that outline
stream and water quality conditions in the Yadkin 02 and goals for improving noted deficiencies.The
Division of Water Resources (DWR) developed the 2008 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basinwide Water Quality
Plan which notes common watershed stressors such as naturally erodible soils, erosion from
agriculture/pasture/logging, and poor riparian buffer vegetation. Degraded stream conditions such as
moderate to severe stream bank erosion, stream channelization, and stream sedimentation are
discussed.The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) developed the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) document which identifies a pattern of habitat degradation across
the Yadkin 02. North Little Hunting Creek is specifically noted for degraded habitat and the RBRP
attributes this to the agricultural operations in its watershed.The RBRP presents broad basin water
quality and restoration goals, including:
• restoring water quality and aquatic habitat in impaired streams;
• protecting high-resource value waters;
• continuing existing watershed restoration and protection efforts in the basin;
• implementing new stream, buffer, and wetland restoration, enhancement, and preservation
projects within TLWs;
• improving stormwater management in urban areas; and
• implementing agricultural BMPs to limit sediment, nutrients, and fecal coliform to streams.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 1 February 2021

The Yadkin River Basin is also discussed in the 2015 Wildlife Resource Commission's (WRC) Wildlife
Action Plan (WAP).This report notes that sedimentation and changes in hydrology and geomorphology
due to urban development, agriculture, and instream mining impacts streams in the basin.The report
also notes that water quality is degraded by excessive nutrient and chemical inputs from wastewater
discharges and agricultural runoff.
The Site was selected to fulfill DMS's mitigation need due to its ability to directly and indirectly address
stressors identified in the RBRP and the WAP by excluding livestock, creating stable stream banks,
restoring a forest in agriculturally maintained buffer areas, and implementing BMPs.These actions will
reduce fecal, nutrient, and sediment inputs to North Little Hunting Creek, and ultimately to Hunting
Creek and South Yadkin River, as well as reconnect instream and terrestrial habitats on the Site.
Restoration of the Site aligns with recommended management strategies outlined in the RBRP.
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions
3.1 Watershed Conditions
The Site watershed (Table 2 and Figure 4) is in the central portion of the Yadkin 02. It is situated in the
rural countryside in Wilkes County between Yadkinville and Wilkesboro, NC.
The Site is located on the western edge of the North Inner Piedmont ecoregion.The Piedmont is
characterized by gently rolling, well-rounded hills with long low ridges, with elevations ranging
anywhere from 300 to 1,500 feet above sea level.The Site topography and relief are typical for the
region, as illustrated in Figure 3. Generally, within the Site limits, North Little Hunting Creek's valley is
unconfined and alluvial, while UT1 and UT2 begin in somewhat confined, steep valleys that widen and
flatten in slope as they approach North Little Hunting Creek.
North Little Hunting Creek originates offsite to the west in the steep, forested Brushy Mountains. Most
of North Little Hunting Creek's watershed is within the eastern blue ridge foothill ecoregion.The stream
gradually widens and flattens in slope as is travels downstream out of the mountains,flowing through
several agricultural parcels before entering the Site. UT1 originates within the Site limits north of Ingle
Hollow Road and flows through three ponds and buried piping before crossing under Ingle Hollow Road
to join North Little Hunting Creek. Land use in UT1's watershed includes agricultural fields and chicken
houses. UT2 begins in steep woods offsite, entering the Site from the south and joining North Little
Hunting Creek within the project area. Old Bus Branch, Rifle Tributary,Trapper Tributary, and Barn
Branch all originate within the Site limits and are tributaries to UT2. Within the Site limits, North Little
Hunting Creek, UT2, and the UT2 tributaries all flow through actively grazed pastures.
The Site and its watershed are not within a Wilkes County zoning development district.The Wilkes
County Growth Management Plan (2014) predicts that the land use within the Site's watershed will
remain rural over the next ten years with no pockets of development predicted.A review of historic
aerials (Appendix 1)from 1945 to 2020 shows that onsite streams have remained in the same
approximate landscape position for the past 65 years with the same adjacent land use, with the
following exceptions:
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 2 February 2021

• North Little Hunting Creek
o The stream has gentle sinuosity in the 1950 aerial but by the 1976 aerial North Little
Hunting Creek is straighter and is crossed by a driveway bridge just downstream of the
UT1 confluence.
• UT1
o The riparian buffer was wooded with pasture or hay beyond in 1950.
o Pond 3 and a chicken house were constructed along UT1 between 1950 and 1963.
o The upstream watershed to UT1 is logged in 1963 with logging roads and a less dense
tree stand visible in the aerial.
o The embankments for Ponds 1 and 2 were built after 1976.
• UT2
o The riparian buffer was converted to pasture between 1963 and 1976.
o In 1976, lower UT2 is aligned straight out to North Little Hunting Creek.
North Little Hunting Creek and its tributaries are classified as Water Supply III (WS-III) waters.WS-III
waters are a water supply source for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes. WS-III waters are
also protected for Class C uses, such as infrequent or unorganized wading and boating events,fishing
and fish consumption, wildlife, aquatic life, and agriculture.
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
Ecoregion Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin River
USGS HUC(8 digit, 14 digit) 03040102,03040102020030
NCDWR Sub-basin 03-07-06
NCDWR Water Quality
Classification WS III
Stream Thermal Regime Warm
North Little Rifle Trapper Old Bus Barn
Hunting Creek UT1 UT2 Tributary Tributary Branch Branch
Drainage Area(acres) 1,274 70 43 12 1.9 5.2 10
2011 NLCD Land Use Classification
Forest 74% 2% 57%
Agricultural 22% 91% 37%
Grassland 0% 0% 6%
Shrubland 2% 0% 0%
Developed 1% 5% 0%
Open Water 1% 2% 0%
%Impervious 0.23% 3% 0%
Notes: Land Use Source—National Land Cover Database 2011(NLCD 2011),Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics(MRLC)
consortium,https://www.mrlc.gov/data and visual assessment of the 2020 aerial.
3.2 Landscape Characteristics
The Site is in the Cat Square terrane of the Piedmont physiographic province which is composed of
deformed metamorphic rocks that have been intruded by younger granitic rocks.The underlying
46.4 Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 3 February 2021

geology of the Site is mapped as biotite gneiss and schist (CZbg) and metamorphosed granitic rock(OCg)
from the late Proterozoic to Cambrian Period (500 to 900 million years in age).
North Little Hunting Creek's riffles consist of somewhat angular gravels and cobbles embedded by fines,
likely generated from eroding banks both onsite and from the upstream agricultural parcels. A gravel-
cobble layer is visible in cut banks along North Little Hunting Creek at an approximate depth of 24 to 30
inches, which may be the historic stream bed elevation. Bedrock is exposed in the bed of North Little
Hunting Creek upstream of the UT1 confluence, as depicted in Figure 2. It is likely that the stream has
downcut but this incision was halted by the bedrock layer.The bedrock depth is several feet deeper
than the proposed restoration design and therefore is not expected to interfere with construction.
The fines deposited within the channel include mica, which indicates erodible soils.The presence of
erodible soils influenced the stream design, particularly in the slope of the stream banks, which have
been laid back to encourage vegetation establishment.The predominant floodplain soils on site are
described in Table 3 below and depicted in Figure 5.
Table 3: Project Soil Types
Soil Name Slopes Description
CoA—Codorus 0 to 2%slopes, This series consists of somewhat poorly drained, nearly level soils on
frequently floodplains on the Piedmont.This soil has low runoff, high permeability,
Loam flooded and floods frequently.
This series consists of moderately steep,well drained soils on side slopes
FaD—Fairview 15 to 25% and ridges on the Piedmont.The permeability is moderate.This soil is
Sandy Loam slopes moderately suited for woodland and poorly suited for field crops due to
the slope and hazard of erosion.
FcC2—Fairview 8 to 15%slopes, This series consists of well drained soils on side slopes and ridgetops on
Sandy Clay Loam moderately the Piedmont.This soil has moderate permeability and low surface
eroded runoff.
UdC— This series consists of gently to strongly sloping areas of Udorthents and
Udorthents- Urban land combined to one mapping unit. Udorthents consists of soil
Urban Land 1 to 15%slopes that has been cut or filled during grading,and Urban land consists of
Complex areas where soils are covered by impervious surfaces such as concrete,
asphalt,etc.
Source:Soil Survey of Wilkes County,North Carolina,USDA-NRCS,
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
Much of the Site, including North Little Hunting Creek, lower UT2, Barn Branch, Old Bus Branch, Rifle
Tributary, and Trapper Tributary, are dominated by pasture grasses such as fescue (Festuca spp.)with
scattered trees along the top of bank and adjacent floodplain. Canopy species within these areas are
primarily black cherry(Prunus serotina), black walnut (Juglans nigra), box elder(Acer negundo), red
maple (Acer rubrum), river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),tree-of-heaven
(Ailanthus altissima),tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera), and white oak(Quercus alba). Shrub species
are primarily Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and pockets of
blackberry(Rubus sp.). In addition to pasture grasses, other herbaceous species include beefsteak plant
(Perilla frutescens), chickweed (Stellaria media), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium),Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and wild garlic (Allium
vineale). Asters (Aster spp.), sedges (Carex spp.), and soft rush (Juncus effusus) are present in wetter
areas around hillside seeps.
UT1 and upper UT2 have a predominantly wooded buffer. Canopy species in these areas include
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), black cherry, black willow (Salix nigra), box elder (Acer negundo),
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 4 February 2021

red maple, river birch, sycamore, and tree-of-heaven.The shrub layer is primarily Chinese privet with
clusters of blackberry and pasture rose. Herbaceous species within these wooded areas include
chickweed, greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia),Japanese honeysuckle, and Japanese stiltgrass. Fescue and
goldenrod (Solidago sp.) are present on the edge of these wooded areas.
3.3 Project Resources
3.3.1 Existing Streams
In February 2019 and March 2020, Wildlands investigated on-site jurisdictional streams within the
proposed project area. All Site streams scored as perennial.Jurisdictional stream features are shown on
Figure 2 and supporting documentation is provided in Appendices 2 and 3.
Geomorphic surveys were conducted on Site streams to characterize their existing condition. Existing
streams and cross section locations are illustrated in Figure 2. NCDWR stream assessment forms are in
Appendix 3 and reach specific cross sections and geomorphic summaries are provided in Appendix 4.
North Little Hunting Creek North Little Hunting Creek
North Little Hunting Creek flows east onto the Site from __-
an abutting agricultural parcel. Within the Site limits, -
cattle have access to the stream and its buffer,
although a fence approximately 20 feet off the left top
of bank prevents cattle from accessing much of the left
floodplain and valley.The pasture is heavily grazed and
the stream banks are devoid of stabilizing vegetation.
As a result, stream banks are severely eroded and
undergoing rotational failure.The stream bed substrate 4:
is cobbles and gravels embedded with fines. Instream
habitat is limited to riffles, runs, and shallow pools with
very little woody debris, leaf packs, or root mats.
Although badly eroded,the stream is not deeply incised
due to intermittent bedrock outcrops.
North Little Hunting Creek flows under a driveway
bridge downstream of the UT1 confluence. .
Downstream of the bridge, North Little Hunting Creek
widens and mid channel bars, lateral bars, and point °''
bars are present. a
North Little Hunting Creek is classified as a moderately r °'' '
to slightly entrenched Rosgen G4 channel.The stream is z ''"
straight and incised, but has some floodplain access rti Y P.-, '%/44
available during storms.
In the southwest corner of the property, a long, linear
stream/wetland feature drains through the pasture to North Little Hunting Creek. Cattle frequently
wallow in this feature.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 5 February 2021

Table 4: North Little Hunting Creek Attribute Table
Reach Summary Information
Parameters North Little Hunting Creek
Length of Reach(Linear Feet) 1,646
Valley confinement(Confined, moderately confined,unconfined) Unconfined
Drainage area(acres) 1,274
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial
NCSAM Score/Stream Function Low
Width to Depth Ratio(ft/ft) 7.5-10.3
Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft) 2.0-2.3
Gradient(ft/ft) 0.0073
Reachwide d50(mm) 15
Medium Gravel
Stream Classification(Existing and Proposed) Existing: G4
Proposed:C4
Evolutionary Trend IV to V
FEMA Zone Classification Zone AE
UT1
UT1 is a first order tributary to North Little Hunting Creek. UT1 originates onsite within Pond 1 as
depicted on Figure 2. Pond 1's principal spillway pipe is clogged and the pool water level is often at the
top of the dam elevation with water spilling over a low point in the embankment. Pond 1's old
emergency spillway, which is in poor condition and is actively breaching, is also often engaged and
flowing.The Pond 1 embankment flow and the emergency spillway flow rejoin at the base of the dam to
enter backwater and wetlands associated with Pond 2. While Pond 2's principal spillway pipe is
functional,the emergency spillway also frequently engages. Pond 2's dam shows evidence of recent
overtopping with debris lines at the top of the dam and the normal pool at the top of the embankment.
Pond 2's dam is badly eroding, with sheer, exposed clay slopes.There is a 2-to 3-foot drop from the end
of the principal spillway pipe to the downstream UT1 channel. Downstream of Pond 2, UT1 flows
through a wooded buffer, has low banks, low slope, and varied
habitat including snags, roots mats, pools, and leaf packs. UT1 UT1 between Pond 2 and Pond 3
here classifies as a high width to depth ratio Rosgen C4 type
channel.The stream continues in this condition for ` ` '
•
approximately 150 LF before it enters an approximate 300 LF
length of buried pipe adjacent to the chicken coops.The pipe
outlets to the backwater of Pond 3. Pond 3 has evidence of
beaver activity around its edges. UT1 exits Pond 3 through the
•
emergency spillway and over a series of 3 active headcuts
totaling 10 feet in drop. UT1 has high, eroded banks through the
headcuts and is at imminent risk of dam breach. • ••
f \t �
UT1 flows into a grated drop inlet to a culvert under Ingle Hollow "' ,
Road.The culvert outlet is perched slightly above the
downstream bed elevation. The culvert is in good condition and appropriately sized for the watershed,
but the drop inlet and perched outlet are barriers to aquatic species migration. Downstream of the
road, slope increases. UT1 is incised and disconnected from the floodplain, although a low bench is
forming. UT1 here classifies as a Rosgen B4 channel.The channel is dominated by algal growth and lacks
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 6 February 2021

woody debris. Instream habitat consists of riffles and pools with some coarse substrate. UT1 gains
access to a narrow floodplain just upstream of its confluence with North Little Hunting Creek.
Table 5: UT1 Attribute Table
Reach Summary Information UT1—headcut below Pond 3
Parameters UT1 " -
Length of Reach(Linear Feet) 996
Valley confinement \, j: .i .
(Confined, moderately confined, Moderately ° i.
confined
unconfined)
Drainage area(acres) 70
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial
NCSAM Score/Stream Function Medium/Low1
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-III
Width to Depth Ratio(ft/ft) 12.7- 19.1
Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft) 1.0-1.8
Gradient(ft/ft) 0.0296
27
Reachwide d50(mm) tom .
Coarse Gravel �•
Stream Classification(Existing and Existing:C4/B4
Proposed:
Proposed) B4a/C4b/C4 _ .- _�
Evolutionary Trend II (piped and t•_ q 4
impounded)- III err
FEMA Zone Classification X .fir-
ry* s c. L!C_• .4• ral�•
1:The medium NCSAM rating applies the section of open UT1 channel `F '• -
between Pond 2 and 3, before UT1 enters the pipe. The low NCSAM
rating applies to UT1 downstream of Pond 3.
UT2
UT2 is another first order tributary to North Little Hunting Creek.The stream enters the Site from a
wooded upstream parcel.The stream channel slope is steep with steep, wooded valley walls.Although
cattle have full access to the stream,fallen trees across the channel appear to discourage access into the
upstream extents of the valley.
The stream bedform is stable with habitat such as
stable cobble/gravel riffles, micropools, leaf packs, UT2—incised upstream,cattle wallow downstream
and woody debris. Approximately 150 LF upstream of
an existing farm road crossing,the stream is confined > �14 • 4
against the left valley wall and cattle impacts increase.
UT2's valley begins to widen as it approaches the
crossing.Just downstream of the crossing, UT2 begins
to drop over headcuts and becomes incised and
disconnected from the floodplain. UT2 regains
connection to the valley downstream but loses
bedform due to extreme cattle trampling.The stream L
becomes anastomosed due to trampling before '
dropping over a 3-foot headcut at its confluence with
Rifle Tributary.The stream continues to be incised _
with areas of active erosion and drops over several •
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 7 February 2021

more headcuts before appearing to stabilize vertically within the incised gully. Here there is some
stream bank erosion present, but the main impairment is the channel incision and confinement. As
UT2's valley begins to widen and decrease in slope, erosion becomes more predominant. Downstream
of UT2's confluence with Barn Branch,the stream is ditched straight out to North Little Hunting Creek.
Within this section, UT2 has no bedform diversity and is a long, silted-in run.There is no woody debris
present within the stream channel and is completely lacking riparian buffer. Cattle graze directly up to
the stream, and the only areas where UT2 regains floodplain connectivity is where the cattle have
trampled the banks for access.
Table 6: UT2 Attribute Table
Reach Summary Information
Parameters UT2
Length of Reach(Linear Feet) 1,707
Valley confinement(Confined, moderately confined,unconfined) Confined to Unconfined
Drainage area(acres) 43
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial
NCSAM Score/Stream Function High/Low1
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-III
Width to Depth Ratio(ft/ft) 2.9-4.7
Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft) 2.3-2.8
Gradient(ft/ft) 0.0791,0.0254
Reachwide d50(mm) Silt/Clay,0.9
Stream Classification(Existing and Proposed) Existing:A6, E5b
Proposed: B5a, B5,C5
Evolutionary Trend III—degradation
FEMA Zone Classification X,AE
1:The high NCSAM rating applies to the upstream most 150 LF of UT2.The low NCSAM rating applies to the rest of
UT2.
Barn Branch
Barn Branch begins at a cattle wallow in a
wetland seep.The watershed draining to the
stream includes a broad, erodible, sloped
pasture area. Barn Branch classifies as an
B5a-type channel but is incised throughout its e T4, '"` ✓�a '
length.The stream is actively eroding in only
one area which suggests that the fine �k � x
sediments embedding the stream substrate
A.
are from the upstream pasture erosion. �v f
Available habitats include some root mats 7 5,
and riffles with shallow pools. ,y -
• �� �.,
F
Barn Branch
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 8 February 2021

Table 7: Barn Branch Attribute Table
Reach Summary Information
Parameters Barn Branch
Length of Reach(Linear Feet) 247
Valley confinement
(Confined, moderately confined,unconfined) Moderately Confined
Drainage area(acres) 10
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial
NCSAM Score/Stream Function Low
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-III
Width to Depth Ratio(ft/ft) 4.3
Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft) 2.5
Gradient(ft/ft) 0.0435
Reachwide d50(mm) 0.1
Stream Classification(Existing and Proposed) Existing: B5a
Proposed: B5a
Evolutionary Trend IV—degradation and widening
FEMA Zone Classification X
Old Bus Branch
Old Bus Branch originates onsite as a perennial Old Bus Branch—above headcut
n
tributary at 10-to 15-foot headcut. Upstream of the _^
headcut, an eroded, ephemeral swale feeds the „•,.
stream. Multiple trees have fallen into the headcut
including a large tree with a massive root system
which has buried the stream and resulted in S. a i
subsurface flow. Downstream of the large tree, Old
Bus Branch continues to be incised and eroded to its
confluence with UT2. Instream habitat is limited to 1 `�
•
small gravel riffles and root mats from the large ' 4 ' • `
l,4'.� v
tree.
k:::,,iii -, .,,,,,. ., .,,,,.- ! -0-'tr-:,,,,,,,-,..--'-'k:4(.
a
4, ;,.. ,cr,,,,, _ , ;,,, t%„_ _„:. +., 4; '..- 1
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 9 February 2021

Table 8:Old Bus Branch Attribute Table
Reach Summary Information
Parameters Old Bus Branch
Length of Reach(Linear Feet) 90
Valley confinement(Confined, moderately confined,unconfined) Confined
Drainage area(acres) 5.2
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial
NCSAM Score/Stream Function Low/Low
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-III
Width to Depth Ratio(ft/ft) 4.9
Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft) 6.3
Gradient(ft/ft) 0.02841
Reachwide d50(mm) 0.1
Very Fine Sand
Stream Classification Existing:G5
(Existing and Proposed) Proposed:A5
Evolutionary Trend III-IV
FEMA Zone Classification X
1:Old Bus Branch's existing conditions longitudinal profile slope was 0.0284 ft/ft. Old Bus Branch's valley slope is
0.1070 ft/ft.
Old Bus Branch—assessment area below headcut Old Bus Bran adcut
0,
� � t,
___ -
--,VAik_
"714.74:-' :'A-"; '.lealV3. .:. ..• ...,- , N AV` ' .:- 0.4 z.,0 • -,
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 10 February 2021

Trapper Tributary and Rifle Tributary
Rifle Tributary and Trapper Tributary are two perennial streams that flow north to join UT2. Rifle
Tributary originates at a headcut.The stream is incised for a distance,then trampled by cattle.Trapper
Tributary originates from a wetland seep and is severely trampled by cattle until its confluence with Rifle
Tributary. Both streams drop over a large headcut at their confluence. Rifle Tributary is incised
downstream of the headcut and continues to be incised to its confluence with UT2.
Table 9:Trapper Tributary and Rifle Tributary Attribute Table
Reach Summary Information
Parameters Trapper Tributary Rifle Tributary
Length of Reach(Linear Feet) 66 193
Valley confinement Moderately Confined Moderately Confined
(Confined, moderately confined,unconfined)
Drainage area(acres) 1.9 12
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Perennial
NCSAM Score/Stream Function Medium Low
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-III WS-III
Width to Depth Ratio(ft/ft) NC NC
Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft) NC NC
Gradient(ft/ft) NC NC
Reachwide d50(mm) NC NC
Stream Classification(Existing and Proposed) NC NC
Evolutionary Trend IV-V III-IV
FEMA Zone Classification X X
NC: Not classified-geomorphic assessments only performed on streams to be restored.
Trapper Tributary Rifle Tributary
max,
3.3.2 Existing Wetlands
Wildlands delineated wetland waters of the US within and immediately adjacent to the proposed
project easement using the USAGE Routine On-Site Determination method presented in the 1987 Corps
of Engineers delineation manual and the subsequent Regional Supplement for the Eastern Mountain
and Piedmont Region.The Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) package was submitted in
September 2020 and approved in February 2021. See Appendix 2 for the approved pJD.
A total of 16 existing jurisdictional wetland features (Wetlands A-P) and four open waters (Pond 1-4)
were documented within the assessment area (Figure 2). On-site wetland features exhibit indicators of
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 11 February 2021

wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils. Primary and secondary indicators of
wetland hydrology observed in existing wetlands include algal mats or crust, high water table, iron
deposits, oxidized rhizospheres on living roots, saturation, saturation visible on aerial imagery, surface
water, sparsely vegetated concave surface, drainage patterns, a positive FAC-Neutral test, and water-
stained leaves. Dominant vegetation species within wetlands include American elm (Ulmus americana),
black willow, honey locust(Gleditsia triacanthos), common boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum), common
rush, creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), duck-potato (Sagittaria latifolia), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum), red maple, rice cut grass (Leersia
oryzoides), river birch, shallow sedge (Carex lurida), and jewelweed (Impatiens capensis). Soils within on-
site wetlands exhibit one of the following hydric soil indicators: depleted matrix, depleted below a dark
surface, redox dark surface, or umbric surface.
3.4 Overall Functional Uplift Potential
The primary stressors on site are incision and entrenchment from channelization, livestock access,
impoundment and piping, and a lack of riparian buffers.These stressors led to low NCSAM scores on all
reaches proposed for restoration. Without intervention, North Little Hunting Creek, UT2 and its
tributaries will continue to erode, contributing more sediment and embedding habitat in the water
supply watershed. UT1,while currently predominantly impounded and piped, has a high risk of dam
failure with headcuts advancing on the dam. Water and sediment trapped behind the dam could
mobilize, potentially flooding Ingle Hollow Road, resulting in stream aggradation and subsequent
erosion downstream. In its current condition, UT1 does not function as a stream.
Ultimately,functional uplift for this Site is linked to improvement in and maintenance of hydrologic
connectivity between streams and floodplains. Additionally, establishing a riparian buffer will protect
and enhance this connectivity. Functional uplift for the site will be achieved through the following:
• Restoring degraded stream channels to reduce erosion and connecting these streams to a
floodplain to improve hydrologic connectivity.
• Removing stream impoundments on and daylighting buried/piped sections of UT1.
• Eliminating bank erosion and associated pollutants.
• Planting riparian buffers to shade streams, help stabilize stream banks, and promote woody
debris in system.
• Fencing out livestock.
• Protecting the Site with a conservation easement.
These project components are described in Section 5 in terms of goals, objectives, and outcomes for the
project and in greater detail in Section 6 as the project site mitigation plan.
3.5 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift
The internal easement breaks may slightly affect the functional uplift potential of the project as they
fragment the conservation corridor; however, livestock will only be permitted within the internal breaks
during supervised pasture roatation events.The valley width on the Site allows for the development of
appropriate pattern and dimensions to restore stable,functioning streams.The degree to which the
physicochemical and biology functions can improve on the Site is limited by the watershed conditions
beyond the project limits, upstream water quality, and the presence of source communities upstream
and downstream of the Site.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 12 February 2021

4.0 Regulatory Considerations
Table 10, below, is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site.These considerations are
expanded upon in Sections 4.1-4.3.
Table 10: Regulatory Considerations Attribute Table
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes No PCN1
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes No PCN1
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix 5
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix 5
Coastal Zone Management Act No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes No2 N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
1: PJD approved by USACE on 2/2/21.PCN to be provided to IRT with Final Mitigation Plan.
2: Floodplain permit will be coordinated with Wilkes County local floodplain administrator.
4.1 Biological and Cultural Resources
A Categorical Exclusion for the Site was approved on October 25, 2019.This document included
investigation into the presence of threatened and endangered species on Site protected under The
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as well as any historical resources protected under The National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
One federally threated or endangered species,the northern long-eared bat(NLEB), is listed for Wilkes
County, NC. Wildlands requested review and comment by the US Fish and Wildlife Service on any
possible issues that might emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory, or other trust
resources. No response was received within the 45-day response period.The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) signed the NLEB 4(d) Streamlined Consultation Form determining that the
project may affect the NLEB, but that any resulting incidental take of the NLEB is not prohibited by the
final 4(d) rule. Approximately 3.6 acres of trees will be cleared during the construction of the project.
The conclusion for cultural resources per the Categorical Exclusion research and response by the State
Historic Preservation Office is that there are no historic resources that would be affected by this project.
The signed Categorical Exclusion checklist and summary are provided in Appendix 5. A complete copy of
the Categorical Exclusion document, including additional information and regulatory communications, is
available upon request.
4.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass
The Site is represented on the Wilkes County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 4826,with an effective
date of March 2, 2009. A portion of the Site is within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) regulatory
floodplain. A limited detail study has been completed for North Little Hunting Creek, from the
downstream project extents up through Reach 2 only. Wildlands is expecting to submit a CLOMR
modeling the changes along North Little Hunting Creek and the adjacent floodway to Wilkes County
prior to construction.
The proposed design associated with the Site has little risk of potential hydrologic trespass upstream of
North Little Hunting Creek since the proposed thalweg elevation matches the existing thalweg elevation
at the upstream tie-in point. Appropriate floodplain width will be excavated as part of the full
restoration along North Little Hunting Creek.
46.4 Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 13 February 2021

4.3 401/404
Some wetlands and open waters adjacent to existing streams will be impacted during realignment of the
stream channel, site grading, and construction access. Removal of impoundments and stream and valley
restoration of UT1 will permanently impact Ponds 1, 2, and 3. Wetlands on the Site that are within the
conservation easement and outside of the limits of disturbance will be flagged with safety fence during
construction to prevent unintended impacts.This will be denoted in the final construction plans.The
Pre-Construction Notification, including this data, will be submitted to the IRT with the Final Mitigation
Plan.
5.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
The project will improve stream functions through removal of stream impoundments and piping,
exclusion of livestock, conversion of pasture and agricultural fields to riparian buffer, and through
restoring streams throughout the entire Site. Within the project limits, North Little Hunting Creek will be
reconnected to its floodplain, and tributaries will no longer be impeded by dams or biologically
disconnected by headcuts and piping.
Project goals are desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement and/or visual
assessment. Objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals.The project will be
monitored after construction to evaluate performance as described in Section 8 of this report.The
project goals and related objectives are described in Table 11.
Table 11: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Function
Goal Objective Expected Outcomes Supported
Reduce direct fecal coliform and
nutrient inputs to the Site
Exclude livestock Install livestock fencing as needed streams. Eliminate hoof shear on
from stream to exclude livestock from stream the stream bed and banks,which Geomorphology,
channels and channels and riparian areas or will reduce stream bank erosion Physicochemical,
buffers. remove livestock from adjacent and fine sediments in the stream Biology
fields. channel. Eliminate cattle
trampling of existing wetlands and
grazing in riparian buffers.
Significantly reduce sediment
inputs from pasture runoff.
Reduce floodplain velocities and
increase retention of flood flows
Convert active cattle pasture to on the floodplain in headwater
forested riparian buffers along all stream systems,decreasing direct Hydrology,
Restore and Site streams,which will slow and runoff and increasing storage and
enhance native treat sediment laden runoff from nutrient cycling within the Hydraulic,
floodplain adjacent pastures and fields before watershed. Increase shading of Geomorphology,
vegetation. entering streams. Protect and stream channels,which will Physicochemical,
enhance existing forested riparian increase dissolved oxygen
Biology
buffers.Treat invasive species. concentrations. Provide a source
of LWD and organic material to
Site streams for continued
habitat. Support all stream
functions.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 14 February 2021

Function
Goal Objective Expected Outcomes Supported
Reconstruct stream channels slated Reduce sediment inputs from
bank erosion. Increase floodplain
for restoration with stable engagement,decreasing runoff Hydraulic,
Improve the dimensions and appropriate depth
stability of stream relative to the existing floodplain. and increasing infiltration. Geomorphology,
Decrease instream shear stresses. Physicochemical,
channels. Add bank revetments and instream Decrease erosion along dam and Biology
structures to protect restored/ pipe outlets. Diversify available
enhanced streams.
habitats.
Increase and diversify available
Install habitat features such as
habitats for macroinvertebrates,
constructed steps,cover logs,and fish,and amphibians. Promote
Improve instream brush toes on restored reaches. aquatic species migration and Geomorphology,
habitat. Add woody materials/LWD to
recolonization from refugia, Physicochemical,
channel beds. Construct pools of leading to colonization and Biology
varying depth. increase in biodiversity over time.
Add complexity including LWD to
the streams.
Install stormwater BMPs in areas of Reduce agricultural and sediment
inputs to the project,which will
Treat concentrated concentrated agricultural runoff to Physicochemical,
agricultural runoff. treat runoff before it enters the reduce likelihood of accumulated Biology
stream channel. fines and excessive algal blooms
from nutrients.
Establish a conservation easement
on the Site. Exclude livestock from
Site streams, remove
impoundments and daylight Hydrology,
Permanently Protect Site from encroachment
protect the project streams,and remove fields from on the riparian corridor and direct Hydraulic,
the riparian buffer. Establish a Geomorphic,
site from harmful restrictive covenant that excludes impact to streams and wetlands. Physicochemical,
uses. livestock from a linear Support all stream functions. Biology
stream/wetland feature entering
North Little Hunting Creek near the
southwestern property boundary.
6.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan
6.1 Design Approach Overview
The design approach for this Site was developed to meet the goals and objectives described in Section 5
which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 3.4.The design is also
intended to provide the expected outcomes in Section 5,though these are not tied to performance
criteria.
The project streams proposed for restoration on the Site will be reconnected with an active floodplain
and the channels will be reconstructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile that will transport the
water and sediment delivered to the system. North of Ingle Hollow Road,the ponds and piped barriers
on UT1 will be removed, and continuous flow will be restored to the system. South of Ingle Hollow Road,
North Little Hunting Creek, UT2 Reaches 2 and 3, Old Bus Branch, and Barn Branch will be raised to
create connectivity with the floodplain.The riparian buffer and existing wetlands will be planted with
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 15 February 2021

native tree species. Instream structures will be constructed in the channels to help maintain stable
channel morphology and improve and diversify aquatic habitat.The entire project area will be protected
in perpetuity by a conservation easement.
The design approach for this Site utilizes a combination of analog and analytical approaches for stream
restoration, and also relies on empirical data and prior experiences and observations. Reference reaches
and reference wetlands were identified to serve as the basis for design parameters. Channels were sized
based on design discharge hydrologic analysis which uses a combination of empirical and analytical data
as described within this report. Designs were then verified and/or modified based on sediment transport
analysis.These design approaches have been used on many successful Mountain and Piedmont
restoration projects and are appropriate for the goals and objectives for this Site.
Table 12:Stream Stressors and Restoration Approach
Design Reach Primary Approach Mitigation Activities
Stressors/Impairments
North Little Severe erosion and cattle Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile, planting
Hunting Creek trampling,channelization, R buffers,excluding cattle, protecting with
Reaches 1 and 2 incision, lack of buffer conservation easement
Impoundments(Ponds 1,
Removing dams,daylighting channel, restoring
UT1 Reach 1 2, 3), buried stream, R dimension, pattern,and profile, planting buffers,
eroding embankments, protecting with conservation easement
active headcuts
channelization incision Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile,
UT1 Reaches 2/3 R replanting buffers, protecting with conservation
sparse/narrow buffers
easement
Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile to correct
Cattle access,confined valley wall confinement and bedform diversity on a
UT2 Reach 1 against left valley wall and Ell portion of Reach 1(located upstream of crossing).
low bedform diversity near Buffer planting/supplemental buffer planting,cattle
crossing exclusion,and protecting with conservation
easement for the entire reach.
Cattle access, Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile, planting
UT2 Reach 2 channelization,cattle R buffers,excluding cattle, protecting with
trampling, incision, poor
conservation easement
buffers
Cattle access,channelized Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile to follow
UT2 Reach 3/4 in unnatural alignment, R fall of valley, planting buffers,excluding cattle,
incision, poor buffers protecting with conservation easement
Severe incision and Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile, planting
erosion,active headcuts,
Old Bus Branch R buffers,excluding cattle, BMP installation,
cattle access in buffers, protecting with conservation easement
poor buffers
Cattle access, Restoring dimension, pattern,and profile, planting
Barn Branch channelization, incision, R buffers,excluding cattle, protecting with
poor buffers conservation easement
Fencing out cattle,stabilizing headcut,
Trapper Tributary Cattle access, headcut Ell supplemental buffer planting, protecting with
conservation easement
Rifle Tributary Cattle access, incision Eli Fencing out cattle, planting buffers, BMP
installation,protecting with conservation easement
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 16 February 2021

6.2 Reference Streams
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds.Twelve reference
reaches were identified for this Site and used to support the design of streams on the Site (Figure 6).
These reference reaches were chosen because of their similarities to the Site streams including drainage
area,valley slope, morphology, and bed material. Due to the variety of slopes and project stream types
present on the Site,the distribution of reference reaches is wide,throughout North Carolina's
mountains,foothills, and piedmont. Geomorphic parameters for most of these reference reaches are
summarized in Appendix 4.The references to be used for the specific streams are shown in Table 13
along with a description of the reach.
Table 13:Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters
Reference Stream Stream Landscape Position Chosen For Used For Used on Streams
Type
Channel dimensions, Q
Box Creek C4 Broad,alluvial landscape position, Dimension, North Little
valley, low slope. habitat structures, Pattern, Hunting Creek
pattern,slope Profile
Connects adjacent
steep wooded
valleys to the wide Sand bed with well- Q
UT to Catawba E5 and flat Catawba established pools, Dimension, North Little
Creek River Reach 1 River floodplain. bedform diversity,and Pattern, Hunting Creek
Low slope,alluvial similar valley slope Profile
valley,flowing into
steeper reach
Connects the wide Good bedform
and flat Catawba diversity,well-
River floodplain to established pools,and 4 North Little
UT to Catawba E3b/C3 Dimension,
the invert of the steeper riffles.Varied Hunting Creek,
Creek River Reach 2 b Catawba River. habitat features with Profile, UT1
Stable E channel examples of woody Pattern
with varying slopes debris structures.
Bedform Diversity and Q Profile
Foust Upstream C4 Low slope through a bank stability through (through North Little
mature forest confined Hunting Creek
less meadered pattern
sections)
Steep,small channel
UT to South Fork Small locally steep, with minimal drainage Dimension, UT1,
B5a area. Natural rock Old Bus Branch,
Fishing Creek confined valley Pattern
structures,steps,and Barn Branch
pools in confined banks Profile
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 17 February 2021

Reference Stream Stream Landscape Position Chosen For Used For Used on Streams
Type
Steep channel slope
Headwater,steep with high sinuosity Q
step-like system through a step-pool Dimension UT1,
Ironwood Tributary A5a+ Old Bus Branch,
with small drainage system. Bank stability Pattern, Barn Branch
area. surrounded by heavy Profile
canopy
Sightly Confined valley with
Entrenc Channel slope with Dimension,
UT to Gap Branch hed Boa alluvial bottom and varied habitat Pattern, UT1
or A4 high slopes. Profile
Confined valley and
Moderate channel
Tiber Tributary B4 alluvial confluence slope in a confined Pattern, UT1, UT2
with larger stream. valley with sinuosity Profile
and varied habitat
Headwater,steep
step-like system in a Steep slopes with Q
Shew Tributary B5a confined valley with sinuosity and cascade- Dimension, UT1,Old Bus
a small drainage
pool sequences over Pattern, Branch
area.
drops Profile
Steep channel slope
with high sinuosity
through a cascade-pool
Headwater,small, Dimension UT1, Barn
UT to Kelly Branch B4/B4asequences over drops.
steep channel Pattern, Branch
Bank stability
surrounded by heavy Profile
canopy
Henry Fork UT1 Headwater,small, Channel slope with Pattern, UT2,
Upstream B4/B4a steep channel varied habitat Profile Barn Branch
Agony Acres UT1 B4 Headwater,small, Channel slope with Pattern, UT2,
Reach 3 steep channel varied habitat Profile Barn Branch
6.3 Design Discharge Analysis
Multiple methods were used to estimate bankfull discharges for restoration reaches including regional
curve data (Harman et al. 2000 and Walker, unpublished), a site-specific reference reach curve, existing
top of bank(maximum discharge) estimates using Manning's equation, and data from previous
successful design projects.The methods were compared, and a design discharge was selected based on
the results of the different methods. Slightly larger design discharges relative to drainage areas were
established for the small tributaries to drive designs of slightly larger channels for these reaches. This
will help prevent filling and clogging of channels with vegetation after construction. Results of each
method and the final design discharges are shown in Tables 14 and 15 and illustrated in Figure 7.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 18 February 2021

Table 14:Summary of Design Bankfull Discharge Analysis
North Little Hunting Creek UT1
Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3
DA(acres) 1148 1274 30 67 70
DA(sq. mi.) 1.79 1.99 0.05 0.10 0.11
NC Mountain Regional Curve(cfs) 146 159 10 17 19
Alan Walker Curve(cfs) 88 96 5 9 10
Site Specific Reference Reach 99 105 13 19 20
Curve
Max Q—Existing Site Streams,top 700 357 60 60 278
of low bank(cfs)
Final Design Q(cfs) 100 110 7 10 11
Table 15:Summary of Design Bankfull Discharge Analysis
UT2
Barn Old Bus
Reach 1 Reach 2 Reaches 3 Branch Branch
and 4
DA(acres) 9 29 43 10 5
DA(sq. mi.) 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.01
NC Mountain Regional Curve(cfs) 4 10 13 4 3
Alan Walker Curve(cfs) 2 5 7 2 1
Site Specific Reference Reach 6 12 15 7 5
Curve
Max Q—Existing Site Streams,top 150 150 105 195 1,263
of low bank(cfs)
Final Design Q(cfs) 6 7 9 6 4
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 19 February 2021

6.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters
Reference reach data and designer experience were used to develop design morphologic parameters for each of the restoration reaches. Key
morphological parameters are summarized in Tables 16-21. Complete design morphological parameters are included in Appendix 4.
Table 16:Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for North Little Hunting Creek and UT2 Reach 4
Existing Parameters Reference Parameters Proposed Parameters
Parameter North Little UT to UT to North Little North Little
UT2 Box Foust UT2
Hunting Catawba Catawba Hunting Creek Hunting Creek
Creek Reach 4 Creek Reach 1 Reach 2 Upstream Reach 4
Reach 1 Reach 2
Contributing Drainage Area 1274 43 1363.2 1024 1024 896 1148 1274 43
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification G4 E5b C4 E5 E3b/C3b C4 C4 C4 C5
Design Discharge Width(ft) 12.4-16.3 3.0 7.9 9.7-12.4 12.3 18.5-19.4 22.0 23.0 8.4
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 1.6-1.7 1.1 1.2 1.2-1.4 1.1 1.2-1.3 1.3 1.4 0.5
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 20.6-25.8 3.2 28.9 11.4-17.5 13.2 23.9-24.1 29.4 31.4 4.5
Design Discharge Velocity 5.0-5.1 5.8 3.0 5.54 6.06 4 3.1 3.7 2.0
(ft/s)
Design Discharge(cfs) 100-110 9 95 80 80 95 100 110 9
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.0073 0.0254 0.0084 0.005 0.027 0.009 0.0049 0.0066 0.0070
Sinuosity 1.07 1.11 1.33 1.1 1.1 - 1.3 1.2 1.3
Width/Depth Ratio 7.5-10.3 2.9 19.1 8.1-8.9 11.5 14.3-15.7 16.4 16.9 15.8
Bank Height Ratio 2.0-2.3 2.3 1.5 1-1.4 1-1.26 1 1.0-1.1 1.0-1.1 1.0-1.1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4-2.7 3.2 3.3 5.4-6.4 4.31 2.9-5.3 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2
d50(mm) reachwide 15 0.9 - 1.8 75.9 61 - -
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 20 February 2021

Table 17:Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT1 Reach 1
Existing Parameters Reference Parameters Proposed Parameters
Parameter
UT to Kelly Timber Trib UT to Gap
UT1 UT1 Reach 1
Branch R1 Branch
Contributing Drainage Area 30-70 51.2 25.6 26 30
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification E4 B4/B4a B4 B4a/A4 C4 B4a
(straight/incised)/C4
Design Discharge Width(ft) 10.2-13.7 7.9 8.9 6.2 5.7 4.5
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 0.7-0.8 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 8.2-9.8 5.7 4.6 3.8 2.3 1.5
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 5.8-5.9 5.9 3.7 5 2.8 4.3
Design Discharge(cfs) 7-11 23 17 18.7 7
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.0296 0.030-0.065 0.0334 0.0680 0.0190 0.0595
Sinuosity 1.1 1.0 1.1 - 1.3 1.1
Width/Depth Ratio 12.7-19.1 10.9 17.0 10.1 13.9 13.5
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-1.8 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0-1.2 1.0-1.2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.2-2.5 1.2 1.5 3.4 >2.2 >1.4
d50(mm) 27 - 6.5 19 - -
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 21 February 2021

Table 18:Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT1 Reach 2 and 3
Existing Parameters Reference Parameters Proposed Parameters
Parameter UT to
UT1 Catawba Timber Agony UT1 Reach 2 UT1 Reach 3
Reach 2 Trib R1 Acres
Contributing Drainage Area 30-70 1024 25.6 96 67 70
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification (straight/incised)/C4 E3b/C3b B4 B4 C4b C4b
Design Discharge Width(ft) 10.2-13.7 12.3 8.9 11.1 6.2 6.6
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 0.7-0.8 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 8.2-9.8 13.2 4.6 7.4 2.6 3.0
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 5.8-5.9 6.06 3.7 4.9 4.1 3.4
Design Discharge(cfs) 7-11 80 17 37 10 11
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.0296 0.027 0.0334 0.0490 0.0380 0.0241
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.04 1.2 1.12
Width/Depth Ratio 12.7-19.1 11.5 17 16.6 14.6 14.3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-1.8 1-1.26 1 1.0 1.0-1.2 1.0-1.2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.2-2.5 4.31 1.5 2.3 >2.2 >2.2
d50(mm) 27 75.9 6.5 51 - -
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 22 February 2021

Table 19:Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT2 Reach 2 and Barn Branch
Existing Parameters Reference Parameters Proposed Parameters
Parameter
UT to Kelly Ironwood Timber Trib UT to Gap
UT2 Reach 2 Barn Branch Branch Shrew Trib A Tributary R1 Branch UT2 Reach 2 Barn Branch
Contributing Drainage Area 29 10 51.2 12.8 19 25.6 26 29 10
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification A6 B5a B4/B4a B5a A5a+ B4 B4a/A4 B5a B5a
Design Discharge Width (ft) 3.5 3.8 7.9 3.6 5.0 8.9 6.2 5.0 4.3
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 2.6 3.3 5.7 1.1 2.7 4.6 3.8 1.6 1.4
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 9.2 6.4 5.9 3.3 4.9 3.7 5.0 5.0 3.9
Design Discharge(cfs) 7 6 23 3.5 13 17 18.7 7 6
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.0791 0.0435 0.030-0.065 0.0634 0.1139 0.0334 0.0680 0.0830 0.0520
Sinuosity 1.08 1.04 1.0 1.1 1.19 1.1 - 1.07 1.09
Width/Depth Ratio 4.7 4.3 10.9 12.1 9.1 17 10.1 15.4 13.2
Bank Height Ratio 2.8 2.5 2.5 1 1.3 1 1.0 1.0-1.2 1.0-1.2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 2.5 1.2 2.1 2.1 1.5 3.4 >1.4 >1.4
d50(mm) 0.9 0.1 - 2 0.91 6.5 19 - -
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 23 February 2021

Table 20:Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for UT2 Reach 3
Existing Proposed
Parameters Reference Parameters Parameters
Parameter
UT to Gap Henry Fork UT to Kelly Timber Trib
UT2 Reach 3 Branch UT1 Branch R1 Agony Acres UT2 Reach 3
Contributing Drainage Area 43 26 32 51.2 25.6 96 43
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification E5b B4a/A4 Ba/B4a B4/B4a B4 B4 B5
Design Discharge Width(ft) 3 6.2 3.2 7.9 8.9 11.1 6.6
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.4
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 3.2 3.8 1.9-3.6 5.7 4.6 7.4 2.6
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 5.9 5 5.4 5.9 3.7 4.9 3.4
Design Discharge(cfs) 9 18.7 8.2 23 17 37 9
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.0254 0.0680 0.04 0.030-0.065 0.0334 0.0490 0.03
Sinuosity 1.11 - 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.04 1.11
Width/Depth Ratio 2.9 10.1 5.2-16.4 10.9 17 16.6 17.1
Bank Height Ratio 2.3 1.0 1.0-1.3 2.5 1 1.0 1.0-1.2
Entrenchment Ratio 3.2 3.4 1.7-2 1.2 1.5 2.3 >1.4
d50(mm) 0.9 19 51 - 6.5 51 -
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 24 February 2021

Table 21:Summary of Design Morphologic Parameters for Old Bus Branch
Existing Proposed
Parameters Reference Parameters Parameters
Parameter UT to South
Old Bus Ironwood Old Bus
Branch Fork Fishing Shrew Trib A Tributary Branch
Creek
Contributing Drainage Area 5 0.02 12.8 19 5
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification G5 B5a B5a A5a+ A5
Design Discharge Width(ft) 4.1 4.1 3.6 5 3.0
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.3
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 3.4 1.8 1.1 2.7 0.9
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 4.8 4.1 3.3 4.9 4.7
Design Discharge(cfs) 4 8 3.5 13 4
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.0284 0.0815 0.0634 0.1139 0.0900
Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.19 1.03
Width/Depth Ratio 4.9 9.3 12.1 9.1 10.3
Bank Height Ratio 6.3 1 1 1.3 1.0-1.2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.1 >1.4
d50(mm) 0.1 3.6 2 0.91 -
6.5 Sediment Transport Analysis
A qualitative assessment of sediment supply and sources in the project watershed was performed using
visual inspection near the Site boundaries and a review of current and historic aerial photos higher in
the watershed.
The Site captures the headwaters of UT1, Old Bus Branch, Rifle Tributary,Trapper Tributary, and Barn
Branch. The watersheds to these streams are agricultural with some woods and land use is not
expected to change in the near future. Agricultural disturbance may provide a source of fine sediments
to the easement over time; however, it is expected that the vegetated buffers and BMPs designed to
intercept concentrated flow paths will filter most fine sediments contributed by these watersheds. A
competence analysis performed for the restoration reaches showed that the bankfull design for these
streams is competent to move material much larger than that observed to transport into the Site (Table
22). To create stability and control grade in these enhancement and restoration reaches, in situ material
will be supplemented from the following sources: harvested material from existing channels where
applicable, appropriately sized onsite rock deposits, and with supplemental imported quarry stone, as
necessary.The mobile particle size from the competence results will be used to inform grade control
structure sizing.The final plans and specifications will specify that both the size and mixture of materials
is conducive to the formation of stable and diverse bedforms. Reseeding streams with existing
streambed material will also be performed to encourage migration of native aquatic organisms to the
new system.
UT2 was reviewed near the upstream Site boundaries, but full watershed access was not possible due to
private property restrictions. UT2's bed material upstream of the Site consists of a mix of alluvial
material from upstream processing and transport, and colluvial deposits from hillslope material that
tiod Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 25 February 2021

have contributed both immobile and mobile sediment to the stream systems.These small boulder,
cobble, gravel, and finer materials form riffles, cascades, and step grade control features within the
steep step-pool stream. Stream banks are stable, and the watershed area above the Site is less than 10
acres and forested. Large, coarse sediment bars were not observed near the Site boundary or along UT2
and onsite sedimentation was primarily fine-grained and concentrated near cattle wallows.A
competence analysis performed for UT2 showed that the bankfull design can transport material larger
than the observed incoming sediments (Table 22), so UT2 will be supplemented with appropriately sized
material to form low-mobility grade control features typical of step-pool channels.
Similar to UT2, North Little Hunting Creek was reviewed
near the upstream Site boundary, but full access to the Coarse sediment source observed in cut bank on
watershed and stream was not possible due to private North Little Hunting Creek
property restrictions. Above the Site, North Little Hunting ;K,r
Creek's bed consists of alluvially transported cobbles,
gravels, and fines. North Little Hunting Creek's watershed
is mostly forested except for a few agricultural parcels
upstream. Stream banks on the agricultural parcel directly ,
upstream of the Site are fenced from livestock and appear ' �; ?
low and stable. Within the Site limits, North Little Hunting • .
Creek's cut banks reveal a buried gravel/cobble layer, and
depositional features suggest a source of both fine and
coarse sediments from the watershed. It is likely that
North Little Hunting Creek has areas of instability higher in " d '
the watershed that will supply the Site post-construction.
A well-developed gravel/cobble bar sample and several subpavement samples were collected on North
Little Hunting Creek to understand the distribution of sediment transported during a bankfull storm
event. A competence analysis performed showed that the design channel is competent to transport the
largest materials delivered by the watershed during bankfull storms. Intermittent grade control
structures will be incorporated to the design to protect against degradation during larger storm events,
and incoming fine sediment will be addressed by stream bank stabilization, connecting the stream to a
floodplain, and excavating wide point bars where fine sediment can deposit.
kiod Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 26 February 2021

Table 22: Results of Competence Analysis
North Little
Hunting Creek UT1 UT2 Old Bus Barn
Reach Reach Branch Branch
Reach 1 Reach 2 1 A 1 B Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4
Abkf(sq ft) 29.4 31.4 1.5 2.3 2.6 3.0 1.6 2.6 4.5 0.9 1.4
Wbkf(ft) 22.0 23.0 4.5 5.7 6.2 6.6 5.0 6.6 8.4 3.0 3.0
Dbkf(ft) 1.3 1.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3
Schan(ft/ft) 0.00486 0.00658 0.0595 0.019 0.038 0.0241 0.083 0.03 0.007 0.09 0.052
Bankfull
(fps) 3.1 3.7 4.3 2.8 4.0 3.4 5.0 3.4 2.0 4.7 3.9
Velocity
Bankfull Shear
Stress,t(Ib/sq 0.4 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.0 0.7 1.6 0.7 0.3 1.4 1.0
ft)
Movable
particle size 30/77 41/97 94/173 36/87 76/150 51/113 130/219 54/118 21/61 109/193 79/154
Shields/Rosgen
(mm)
Largest particle
from bar/ 76.2 76.2 82.6 82.6 82.6 82.6 54.4 50.3 50.3 53.8 18
su bpavement
sample(mm)
6.6 Stream Design Implementation
Due to the heavy agricultural use of the land and the degraded stream conditions,Wildlands' approach
to improving the streams on the Site focuses on widespread restoration with enhancement II proposed
on the few headwater reaches that are not as extensively affected by livestock.The tributaries south of
Ingle Hollow Road are steep, and a combination of Priority 1 and Priority 2 restoration was necessary
given the slope of the valley sidewalls and the depth of the existing streams. On North Little Hunting
Creek,the stream will be raised and a floodplain bench will be constructed, representing a blend of a
Priority 1 and Priority 2 approach, due to the existing FEMA floodplain elevations as well as the existing
driveway bridge elevation. UT1 will have all impoundments and piped sections of channel removed,
allowing for full restoration of the stream. Livestock will be excluded from the entire conservation
easement as part of the project, and the landowner will install cattle watering systems post-construction
as part of the project implementation.
Meandering Priority 2 design sections have been designed with an outer bench that is approximately
half the designed bankfull riffle width. Bench corridors are designed straight down valley and do not
meander with the top of the bank. A 3:1 bench to existing ground tie out slope is used along Priority 2
corridors, with brief areas of 2:1 tie out slope where the design transitions from old to new channel.
Prior to excavation of Priority 2 benches,topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled for replacement on the
new bench. Soil amendments may be incorporated into benches if determined necessary during
construction.
Figure 8 illustrates the concept design; below are descriptions of the designs for each reach.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 27 February 2021

6.6.1 North Little Hunting Creek
North Little Hunting Creek will be built as a C type stream with the broad, alluvial floodplain.The
driveway bridge at the Reach 1/Reach 2 break is to remain, and due to the need to meet elevations at
the upstream and downstream ties as well as midreach, North Little Hunting Creek's design raises the
channel bed slightly while also excavating the floodplain. Due to the erosive soils observed onsite, North
Little Hunting Creek's banks have been designed with a minimum 3.5:1 side slope. Assorted riffles built
from wood and stone, brush toe bank protection, and vanes are strategically placed to diversify the
bedform and provide stability as the site revegetates. Drain tiles entering North Little Hunting Creek
from the right floodplain will be excavated within the conservation easement. If the drain tiles extend
beyond the conservation easement, an ephemeral pool will be placed at the outlet of the drain tiles
within the easement to capture and still the flow.
6.6.2 UT1
Due to the extensive manipulation of UT1 with three impoundments and a long section of buried/piped
channel, UT1's restoration will be earthwork intensive. Restoration of the valley first while balancing
earthwork influenced the design of this stream.
UT1 Reach 1 begins at the stream's jurisdictional origin and continues to the proposed stream crossing.
UT1 Reach 1's design alternates between lower sloped C-type design with meandering pattern,
generally through Pond 1, Pond 2, and Pond 3's beds, and steeper Ba-type design through the
embankments. Two sets of UT1 Reach 1 typical riffle and pool cross sections are provided for these two
alternating design approaches. Where UT1 is buried in pipe,the location of the existing chicken houses
in the left floodplain functions as a design boundary. A landowner-required 30-foot offset from the
edge of the chicken houses defined the left valley grading limits while the existing valley defined the
right valley grading limits. Wildlands' design will daylight UT1 onto a broad, Priority 2 valley floor six to
eight feet below the existing ground elevation. At the end of the chicken houses, UT1 will drop down in
a steep Ba-type design to meet the existing bed elevation of Pond 3.
UT1 Reach 1 continues from the backwater of Pond 3 to Ingle Hollow Road. The design incorporates a
moderately sloped, meandering Cb-type channel. Outside of UT1 Reach 1's valley, Pond 3 will be filled
and graded to restore usable fields for the landowner. A culvert crossing will be installed at the end of
UT1 Reach 1 under the existing overhead utility easement.
Removal of the ponds will involve dewatering the normal pool first, either through pumping, dam
notching, or a combination thereof. Unconsolidated sediments in the dewatered pond bottoms deemed
unsuitable for construction will be excavated and spread in a designated splay area to dry. Suitable fill
may be imported if needed. Stream construction will begin after ponds are fully dewatered and the
dams notched to prevent ponding.
UT1 Reach 2 begins just downstream of the culvert crossing and continues through the Pond 3
embankment. UT1 Reach 2 steepens slightly as a step-pool type channel. The grated drop inlet leading
to the culvert under Ingle Hollow Road will be removed. Headwalls will be constructed around the
existing Ingle Hollow Road culvert to allow UT1 Reach 2 to freely flow into the culvert.
UT1 Reach 3 begins at the outlet of the Ingle Hollow Road culvert and ends at the confluence with North
Little Hunting Creek. The stream is designed as a meandering Cb-type stream and joins North Little
Hunting Creek at a riffle just upstream of the existing driveway bridge. The stream will be raised slightly
to meet the existing outlet of the culvert, allowing for aquatic species passage.
On lower sloped C-and Cb-type streams, assorted riffles built from wood and stone, brush toe bank
protection, and vanes have been incorporated into the design to diversify available habitat and provide
tiod Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 28 February 2021

stability as the site revegetates. Within the steep Ba-type sections, rock step-pools and boulder
cascades are strategically placed to stabilize very steep sections of channel.
6.6.3 UT2
UT2 Reach 1 begins at the upstream property boundary and ends at the proposed culvert crossing. For
the first 150 LF, UT2 Reach 1 will be enhanced with supplemental planting and livestock exclusion only.
Just downstream of this, UT2 Reach 1 becomes confined along the left valley wall and is extensively
impacted by cattle trampling. UT2 Reach 1's alignment will be relocated to the center of the valley and
stabilized as a step pool channel, contiguous with the downstream design. A bankfull bench will be
constructed here to provide storage for any incoming sediments from upstream.
UT2 Reach 2 begins downstream of the proposed culvert crossing and continues to the stream's
confluence with Rifle Tributary where the valley slope changes. UT2 Reach 2 is designed as a Ba-type
channel that dissipates energy over drop structures such as rock step-pools and boulder cascades. After
the Rifle Tributary confluence,the valley slope decreases considerably, and UT2 Reach 3 is designed as a
B-type channel. Reach 3's alignment follows the existing channel bed,then shifts into the left floodplain
to preserve specimen trees on the existing stream bank. Downstream of the specimen trees,the stream
valley narrows and the proposed alignment again follows the approximate existing channel. As the
valley widens, UT2 Reach 3's design alignment shifts right to follow the low point in the valley. UT2
Reach 3 ends where the stream enters the broad North Little Hunting Creek floodplain. UT2 Reach 4's
design transitions to a low sloped, C-type stream which meanders across the North Little Hunting Creek
floodplain to join the main channel at a riffle.
UT2 Reach 4 will have a diverse array of constructed wood and stone riffles installed in addition to brush
toe bank protection in bends. The upper reaches of UT2 will have rock step-pools and boulder cascades
strategically placed to stabilize very steep sections of channel and will have an array of riffle and pool
structures as well to diversify habitats.
6.6.4 Barn Branch
Barn Branch begins at the base of a hillslope wetland seep. The channel is designed as a steep, Ba-type
channel with gentle pattern that moves out into the right floodplain to the existing low point of the
valley. Barn Branch flows through an existing wetland before joining UT2. The design incorporates rock
and log steps, steep riffles, and rock cascades to stabilize this steep system while providing habitat.
Brush toe will be incorporated into one large meander bend where Barn Branch turns to join UT2. The
conservation easement extends over 120 feet upstream of Barn Branch's jurisdictional start and
encompasses an existing wetland. By expanding the conservation easement,the existing wetland will
be protected from disturbance and can help capture and provide some treatment for the upstream
eroding pastureland.
6.6.5 Old Bus Branch
Old Bus Branch's existing valley is a deep, actively eroding gully, which drove design to focus first on
valley restoration. The design of Old Bus Branch focused on restoring a valley bottom with a smooth
and even slope and creating stable valley side slopes. From there, Old Bus Branch's design followed the
newly designed valley as a Ba-type channel.The stream alignment shifts to the right of the existing gully
at the upstream extent,then moves back into the old alignment as the stream approaches the UT2
confluence. Structures in Old Bus Branch will alternate between rock step pools and rock cascades to
stabilize the system while providing habitat. A step pool stormwater conveyance BMP will be
constructed upstream of the jurisdictional start of Old Bus Branch to address the eroded, ephemeral
swale and capture and treat runoff and flow from the adjacent pasture.This structure is anticipated to
fill with sediment and vegetation over time and transition to a stable,vegetated swale; no long-term
maintenance is proposed after stabilization.
tiod Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 29 February 2021

6.6.6 Rifle and Trapper Tributary
Rifle and Trapper Tributaries are enhancement II reaches, but in-channel work will be performed to
address localized instabilities. Riffle Tributary drops over active headcuts as it incises to join UT2.
Instream structures are proposed on Rifle Tributary to arrest the headcuts, and localized bank sloping
and stabilization will be completed to address localized erosion. Rifle Tributary also will be extended to
meet the new location of UT2 within their valley. A small headcut at the end of Trapper Tributary will be
treated with a log sill structure. Both streams will have livestock excluded, and a pocket wetland BMP
will be installed upslope of jurisdictional features on Rifle Tributary to capture and treat runoff and flow
from the adjacent pasture. This wetland BMP is expected to slowly accumulate with vegetation and
pasture runoff and transition to a vegetative buffer over time with no long-term maintenance after
stabilization.
6.7 Vegetation, Planting Plan, and Land Management
Non-forested areas within the conservation easement will be planted,which includes additional buffer
areas beyond the minimum requirement of 30 feet from top of bank. Riparian buffers will be planted
with a mix of early successional and climax native vegetation chosen to develop a forested riparian zone.
The specific species composition to be planted was selected based on the community type, observation
of occurrence of species in riparian buffers adjacent to the Site, and best professional judgement on
species establishment and anticipated Site conditions in the early years following project
implementation.The Piedmont Bottomland Forest and Piedmont Alluvial Forest community types were
used as references for creating the site planting plan. Many of the selected species are representative of
these community types although a few additional early successional species were included to help
climax species establish. Species chosen for the planting plan are listed in the draft plans located in
Appendix 12.
The riparian buffer will be planted with bare root seedlings. Areas proposed for riparian buffer planting
that are outside the limits of disturbance but deemed to be compacted will be subsoil plowed prior to
planting.The stream banks will be planted with live stakes and the channel toe will be planted with
multiple herbaceous species. Permanent herbaceous seed will be spread on streambanks,floodplain
areas, and disturbed areas within the project easement. Bare root seedlings and live stakes will be
planted in the dormant season between October 28 and April 7.
Fescue along restoration and enhancement reaches will be treated preconstruction,while other invasive
species will be treated primarily by mechanical removal during construction, including multiflora rose,
privet, and mimosa.The extent of invasive species coverage will be monitored, mapped, and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period. Please refer to Appendix 7 for the post-
construction invasive species treatment plan. Additional monitoring and maintenance issues regarding
vegetation are in Sections 8 and 9 and Appendix 9.
6.8 Utilities,Stream Crossings, and Site Access
Table 23 summarizes the proposed crossings on the Site. All crossings are included in the easement and
are existing utility or stream crossings except for the easement break at Ingle Hollow Road.
Two overhead utility easements overlap the project easement; one on UT1 Reach 1 and one on North
Little Hunting Creek Reach 1, as shown in Table 23. The UT1 utility crossing is collocated with the
proposed culvert crossing while the North Little Hunting Creek utility crossing does not have an
associated stream bed crossing.
The UT1 and UT2 culvert crossings will be fenced with 5-strand barbed wire and gated.The culvert pipes
will be buried 6 to 12 inches to allow for a natural stream bed through the crossing, promoting fish
passage and aquatic habitat continuity.The North Little Hunting Creek crossing will be gated but does
tiod Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 30 February 2021

not require cross fencing. The maintenance of the crossings will be the responsibility of the landowner
once the project is closed by the NCIRT and transferred to NCDEQ stewardship.
The landowner is responsible for installing fencing as needed and providing water to the livestock post-
project.The landowner states that he will install electrified high tensile fence within the North Little
Hunting Creek floodplain and woven wire fencing with a single strand of barbed wire along the top
throughout the remainder of the Site. The maintenance of the fence and the watering systems will be
the responsibility of the landowner.
The easement area can be accessed for construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from Ingle
Hollow Road.
Table 23:Crossings Summary
Reach Crossing Location(STA) Crossing Type Within Conservation
Easement?
North Little Hunting 103+11—103+43 Utility only/no stream bed Yes
Creek Reach 1 crossing or livestock access
North Little Hunting 107+92—108+52 Gated bridge for vehicular Yes
Creek Reach 2 access only
Utility and fenced culvert
UT1 Reach 1 214+33—214+84 crossing—no livestock Yes
access to stream
UT1 Reach 2 217+37—218+04 External culvert crossing for No
public DOT road
UT2 Reach 1 303+00—303+50 Fenced culvert crossing—no Yes
livestock access to stream
6.9 Project Risk and Uncertainties
In general,this project is low risk.The landowners live in the immediate area and are active on the
property.They will be able to repair damaged fences and/or remove stray livestock from the easement
quickly. Upon completion of construction, easement will be delineated with fence, witness posts, and
signage as outlined in NC DMS's 2018 guidance document to discourage accidental encroachment.
There is little to no risk of hydraulic trespass from the project due to the current and designed slopes of
the project channels. Erosive soils were observed onsite and the design incorporates low sloped banks
to mitigate this risk while vegetation and root mass establishes,which will increase the stability of the
banks over time.
The potential for future urban development in these watersheds is quite low due to the rural nature of
the project.The Site captures the UT1 headwaters and much of the UT2 headwater drainage features,
and thus controls the majority of those riparian land use. Much of the North Little Hunting Creek
watershed is within the Brushy Mountains, and although assessed in the NC NHP database for
biodiversity and wildlife habitat,the portion of the Brushy Mountains that drain to the site are not in
conservation.The highest potential risk to land use change in the North Little Hunting Creek watershed
is the potential for logging. Logging may increase peak flows and sediment to North Little Hunting Creek.
This risk has been mitigated by providing wide floodplain access and low sloped point bars to provide
fine sediment storage areas within the design.
All stream and wetland projects have some risk for beaver colonization.There is evidence of
current/past beaver activity on UT1 around Pond 3. After the removal of Pond 3,the area will be
watched for beaver activity. If beaver persist on UT1 or move into other project areas, Wildlands will
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 31 February 2021

follow the Maintenance Plan (Appendix 9)to address the issue. Similarly, should utility/roadway
maintenance work occur in the future and encroach within the conservation easement,Wildlands will
follow the Maintenance Plan to repair disturbed signage or damaged stream areas. Wildlands has
minimized this risk by setting the external easement break at Ingle Hollow Road outside of the right-of-
way.
7.0 Performance Standards
The stream performance standards for the project will follow approved performance standards
presented in the DMS Mitigation Plan Template (Version 2.3,June 2017),the Annual Monitoring
Template (June 2017), and the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update issued October 2016 by the USACE and NCIRT. Annual monitoring and routine site visits will be
conducted by a qualified scientist to assess the condition of the finished project. Specific performance
standards that apply to this project are those described in the 2016 Compensatory Mitigation Update
including Vegetation (Section V, B, Items 1 through 3) and Stream Channel Stability and Stream
Hydrology Performance Standards (Section VI, B, Items 1 through 7). Performance standards summaries
are listed in Table 24.
Table 24:Summary of Performance Standards
Parameter Monitoring Feature Performance Standard
STREAM SPECIFIC PERFOMANCE STANDARDS1,2
Dimension Cross Section Survey BHR<1.2; ER>2.2 for C/E channels
BHR<1.2; ER>1.4 for A/B channels
Pattern and Profile Visual Assessment Should indicate stream stability
Substrate Pebble Counts Coarser material in riffles;finer particles in pools
Photo • Cross-Section Photos No excessive erosion or degradation of banks
Documentation • Photo Points Stable grade control
Hydrology Pressure Transducer • Four bankfull events during the 7-year period;in separate years
SITE PERFOMANCE STANDARDS
MY3 success criteria:320 planted stems per acre
MY5 success criteria: 260 planted stems per acre, average of 6
Vegetation Vegetation Plots feet in height in each plot
MY7 success criteria:210 planted stems per acre,average of 8
feet in height in each plot
Visual Assessment CCPV Maps Signs of encroachment, instability,and invasive species
1: BHR=bank height ratio,ER=entrenchment ratio
2:The tributaries are designed to incise as they approach the main streams,so this would not be considered a trend towards
instability.Riffles may fine over the course of monitoring on North Little Hunting Creek due to the stabilization of contributing
watershed sediment sources.
o.0 Long-Term Management Plan
The Site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality(NCDEQ)
Stewardship Program.This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term steward for
the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the
conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on a yearly basis
until such time an endowment is established.The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an
tiod Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 32 February 2021

endowment system within the non-reverting, interest-bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund
Account.The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General
Statue GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the purpose of
stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable.
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage as needed to identify boundary markings as
needed. Any livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility the owner
of the underlying fee to maintain.
The Site Protection Instrument can be found in Appendix 8.
Table 25: Long-term Management Plan
Long-Term Management Activity Long-Term Manager Responsibility Landowner Responsibility
The landowner shall report
damaged or missing signs to the
The long-term steward will be long-term manager,as well as
responsible for inspecting the Site contact the long-term manager if
Signage will be installed and boundary during periodic inspections a boundary needs to be marked,
maintained along the Site (every one to three years)and for or clarification is needed
boundary to denote the area maintaining or replacing signage to regarding a boundary location. If
protected by the recorded ensure that the conservation land use changes in future and
conservation easement. easement area is clearly marked. fencing is required to protect the
easement,the landowner is
responsible for installing
appropriate approved fencing.
The long-term manager will be
responsible for conducting periodic
inspections(every one to three years)
and for undertaking actions that are The landowner shall contact the
The Site will be protected in its reasonably calculated to swiftly
entirety and managed under the correct the conditions constituting a long-term manager if clarification
terms outlined in the recorded breach.The USACE,and their is needed regarding the
conservation easement. authorized agents,shall have the right restrictions associated with the
to enter and inspect the Site and to recorded conservation easement.
take actions necessary to verify
compliance with the conservation
easement.
9.0 Monitoring Plan
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Table 26 and 27. Approximate locations of
the proposed vegetation plots, photo points, and cross sections are illustrated in Figure 9.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 33 February 2021

Table 26: Monitoring Components
Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes
Parameter Monitoring Feature NLHC NLHC UT1 UT1 UT1 Old Bus Barn
Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Branch Branch
Riffle Cross-sections 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Dimension Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 1
Pool Cross-sections 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2
Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate Reach wide(RW) Pebble Count 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 3
Hydrology Crest Gage(CG)and/or 1 CG 1 CG N/A N/A Semi-Annual 4
Stream Gage(SG)
Vegetation CVS Level 2/Mobile Plots 10 Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 5
(Permanent/Mobile) (7/3)
Visual Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Assessment
Exotic and
nuisance Semi-Annual 6
vegetation
Project Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference Photographs 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 Annual
Photos
1. Cross-sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location.Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,including top of bank,bankfull,edge of water,
and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits.Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built baseline monitoring survey only,unless observations
indicate widespread lack of vertical stability(greater than 10%of reach is affected)and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected during the baseline monitoring only.Substrate assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of reachwide substrate
monitoring.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be monitored using automated pressure transducers.Transducers will set to record bank full events at least twice a day and stream flow at least
every 3 hours and will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually.Evidence of bankfull and stream flow events will be documented with a photo when possible.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted.2%of the open planted acreage will be monitored
with permanent and mobile plots.Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols.Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will
document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot.Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped
7. Locations of vegetation damage,boundary encroachments,etc.will be mapped.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 34 February 2021

Table 27: Monitoring Components
Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes
Parameter Monitoring Feature UT2 UT2 UT2 UT2 Rifle Trapper
Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4 Tributary Tributary
Riffle Cross-sections N/A 1 1 1 N/A N/A
Dimension Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 1
Pool Cross-sections N/A 0 1 0 N/A N/A
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2
Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate Reach wide (RW) Pebble Count 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW N/A N/A Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 3
Hydrology Crest Gage(CG)and/or 1 CG N/A N/A Semi-Annual 4
Stream Gage(SG)
Vegetation CVS Level 2/Mobile Plots 5 Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 5
(Permanent/Mobile) (4/1)
Visual Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Exotic and nuisance
Semi-Annual 6
vegetation
Project Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference Photos Photographs 2 2 2 2 1 1 Annual
1. Cross-sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location.Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,including top of bank,bankfull,edge of water,
and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits.Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built baseline monitoring survey only,unless observations
indicate widespread lack of vertical stability(greater than 10%of reach is affected)and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected during the baseline monitoring only.Substrate assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of reachwide substrate
monitoring.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be monitored using automated pressure transducers.Transducers will set to record bank full events at least twice a day and stream flow at
least every 3 hours and will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually.Evidence of bankfull and stream flow events will be documented with a photo when possible.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted.2%of the open planted acreage will be monitored
with permanent and mobile plots.Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols.Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will
document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot.Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped
7. Locations of vegetation damage,boundary encroachments,etc.will be mapped.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 35 February 2021

"0.0 Adaptive Management Plan
Upon completion of Site construction,Wildlands will implement the post-construction monitoring
defined in Sections 7 and 8. Project maintenance will be performed during the monitoring years to
address minor issues as necessary (Appendix 9). If during annual monitoring it is determined the Site's
ability to achieve Site performance standards are jeopardized in any other way,Wildlands and DMS will
notify the members of the IRT and work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
11.0 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 28 are projections based upon the proposed design.
The credit ratios proposed for the Site have been developed in consultation with the Interagency Review
Team (IRT) as summarized in the IRT contracting meeting minutes dated July 24, 2019.This
correspondence is included in Appendix 6.
1. The requested stream restoration credit ratio is 1:1 for mitigation activities that include
reconstruction of the channels to a stable form and connection of the channels to the adjacent
floodplain.
2. Enhancement II is proposed at 2.5:1 credit to reflect cattle exclusion and buffer planting as
needed. Cattle activity appears infrequent in the upper extent UT2 Reach 1 due to its steep
valley, but the ratio is justified because the downstream most 150 LF of UT2 Reach 1 will receive
restoration-type treatment. Rifle Tributary and Trapper Tributary are small, seep-driven streams
that flow through a heavily vegetated wetland. Rifle Tributary has several headcuts that are
advancing up from UT2 that will be stabilized as part of this work.
3. No direct credit is sought for the BMPs upslope of Rifle Tributary and Old Bus Branch to treat
concentrated agricultural runoff. No direct credit is sought for the restrictive covenant excluding
cattle from a linear stream/wetland feature leading to North Hunting Creek near the
southwestern property boundary. Cattle will likely be excluded from this feature with fencing.
Buffers proposed throughout the Site meet the minimum required 30-foot standard width for Mountain
streams, and in most cases,far exceed it. A detailed buffer credit calculation using the USACE
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator(updated January 19, 2018)was completed to
calculate credit increases based on buffer widths which exceed the 30-foot minimum.To complete these
calculations in GIS,the proposed bankfull/top of bank lines were offset to create concentric, ideal buffer
zones, up to 150 feet from bankfull. The ideal buffer zone area was compared to the actual area within
the creditable portion of the conservation easement, and these areas added to the calculator. Buffer
zones are illustrated in a figure in Appendix 11. Appendix 11 also contains the Stream Buffer Credit
Calculator output and the credit release schedule.
46.4 Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 36 February 2021

Table 28: Project Asset Table
Project Components
Project Component or Existing Restoration Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Proposed
Reach ID Footage/ Footage/ Category Level Level Ratio Credit1'2
Acreage Acreage
North Little Hunting Creek
1 722.891
Reach 1 722.891
1,646 Warm R P2
North Little Hunting Creek
Reach 2 1,027.699 1 1,027.699
UT1 Reach 1 1,432.566 R P2 1 1,432.566
UT1 Reach 2 996 244.166 Warm R P2 1 244.166
UT1 Reach 3 217.854 R P2 1 217.854
UT2 Reach 1 299.894 Ell P1, P2 2.5 119.958
UT2 Reach 2 286.845 Warm R P1, P2 1 286.845
1,707
UT2 Reach 3 473.252 R P1, P2 1 473.252
UT2 Reach 4 617.622 R P1, P2 1 617.622
Barn Branch 247 287.628 Warm R P1, P2 1 287.628
Old Bus Branch 90 87.254 Warm R P1, P2 1 87.254
Rifle Tributary 193 245.414 Warm Ell N/A 2.5 98.166
Trapper Tributary 66 49.294 Warm Ell N/A 2.5 19.717
Net credit gain for buffers wider than 30-feet3 181.980
Project Credits
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level
Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration 5,397.777
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II 237.841
Creation
Preservation
Credit Gain: Buffers>30-feet3 181.980
Totals 5,817.598
Notes:1. Crossing lengths have been removed from restoration footage.
2. No direct credit for BMPs.
3. Detailed calculations for credits gained for buffers wider than 30-feet included in Appendix 11.
4, Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 37 February 2021

12.0 References
Andrews, E.D. 1980. Bed-material entrainment and hydraulic geometry of gravel-bed rivers in Colorado.
Geological Society of America Bulletin 95: 371-378.
Chartrand, S.M.,Jellinek, M., Whiting, P.J., Stamm,J. 2011. Geometric scaling of step-pools in mountain
streams: Observations and implications. Geomorphology 129:141-151.
Harman, W.A. and C.J.Jones. 2016. Functional Lift Quantification Tool for Stream Restoration Projects in
North Carolina: Spreadsheet User Manual Version 2. Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC.
Harman, W. R. Starr, M. Carter, K.Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012.A Function Based
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Harman, W.H. et. al. 2000. Bankfull Regional Curves for North Carolina Mountain Streams. NC Mountain
Curve. Proc. AWRA Conf.Water Resources in Extreme Environments, Anchorage, AK. Pp. 185-190.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2011. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP), accessed at:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed Planning/Yadkin River Basin/2009%
20Upper%20Yadkin%2ORBRP Final%20Final%2C%2026feb%2709.pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) 2008 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basinwide Water
Quality Plan, accessed at:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/BPU/BPU/Yadkin/Yadkin%20PIans/2010%20P1
an/Yadkin%202008%20PIan%20with%201R%20and%20Bio%20Appendice.pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality(NCDWQ). 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications
North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS), 1985. Geologic map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale.
Compiled by Philip M. Brown at el. Raleigh, NC, NCGS.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Wilkes County, NC.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D. L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the Federal
Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March 2001.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simon,A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
Shields, A. 1936. Application of similarity principles and turbulence research to bedload movement. Mit.
Preuss. Verchsanst., Berlin. Wasserbau Schiffbau. In W.P Ott and J.C. Uchelen (translators),
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Report No. 167: 43 pp.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2016. Federal Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of
Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District.
October 24, 2016.
4, Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 38 February 2021

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2020. Endangered Species,Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species,Wilkes County, NC.
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/Wilkes.html
Walker,Alan, unpublished. NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve.
Weaver,J.C., Feaster,T.D., and Gotvald, A.J., 2009, Magnitude and frequency of rural floods in the
Southeastern United States,through 2006—Volume 2, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey
Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5158, 111 p.
Wilkes County Planning Department, 2014. Wilkes County Growth Management Plan.
https://www.wilkescounty.net/DocumentCenter/View/126/Growth-Management-Plan-PDF?bidld=
4, Huntsman Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 39 February 2021

FIGURES

03040101060030 'III
1 .1W
03040;101060010 Nik. Downtown Elkin
Historic District 03040101080040
FNC Division of Mitigation , 0304.101070030 r�LL37- c0- �'
I • 1
Services Easement ; : ; Wilkes;Cpi ty;Open Space; . • • •0 dOEM
''41 } 03040101080060
• 03040101070020 i:!f at"�
rr
1' r
,0(30�(40,101070 10 li ata
Ronda• •
+
. _ ,- 0304010,107�060 �
�w ���� �`" . . . . . . .Town of Ronda. . . . 'A. .
►, NC Land and Water Fund
r 1 Funded Project
03040101060050
'.� •�'�ic♦ + 0304m/07,0050• • • •{ . ; .
f i, Claymont Hili
%w • • • • • ' Tdvirri of Ronda- • • • •i• • • • • • • ,do- +.
it; • - - • • • • •Yadkin tiverAccess I
Wilkes Comfy Open Space 03040101070040 • • •
I a-0304010.1130020a • • .
i ,.�
I 1 -
% 03040101060070 ■■ • I.
■ YADKIN CO
-WILKESCO- 7 NC Department ofTransportation
03040101060060 II ,IVlitigatiori Si • ,
. . . . . • • • . mia . . . . I r.
House91ea . . . . . .
t'03040102020030•
1, • • •IVC;Division of Mitigatio' •
Services•Easement - •
I
I
03040102020010
a
Brushy.Mountains 1
. \ : • ir• =at
.-s . . 03040102 20=—r--••ti-.-•-i--:..
844040111119.1,MP
Project Location ! Hydrologic Unit Code(14-Digit) Significant Natural Hertiage Areas • •• - .
L_ _ j County Line -I Targeted Local Watershed NC Natural Heritage Program Managed
Areas
(1; Municipalities ; ; ; ; Water Supply Watershed
0 303d Listed Streams
_ Yadkin 02 River Basin NC Historic Preservation Areas
iul irlu,uu 03Q4 j02010020\ �_
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
�' W I L D L A N D S Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 2 Miles Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I I I I N
Wilkes County, NC

_ Project Parcels
*. 11'lit
�_ Proposed Conservation Easement
,, , (A ,1 Existing Wetlands
. *i,. Existing Pond
' P
::1.0t *.... .. ...
,. .:. f Perennial Stream
t A5
r. Intermittent Stream
Non-Project Streams
Existing Culvert/Piped Stream
Pond 1
'4. x — x Existing_Fencing
•-
.� a : ':;.K'`r';,c.:F.. • p Utility Line
- Existing Conditions Cross-Sections
Pond 2 -
Topographic Contours (20')
0 ® Existing Conditions Reach Breaks
, tillinligr , 1 C Embankment
I \\
Headcut
ot;, + ,�. .. �; ..:�� , ��N Bedrock
� i , , ," - ;�.w , i , I Utility Pole
ti '.i�.I'` :' _ ': „J +r-r-•�. .. ' •: , ' X 0 DWR Stream Form Locations
i \ ....----..,---------,----
,. I •
-- --- ^- ��'�`-
.41104. •
' .'4 Pond 3 !
• 1
1... ''.' '' 1 _... a.
7*. ' 1 00 e. \ \ ,.
%. x , ., . joys) ).
• 11111P
$) \...-1
lilaCP
T — , North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
y .:�. F:' �. .. T � x_ -x — x — — D _ 7- r. N.�y
1, :x— O _- - - kI
•
41; North X ysl 1 1111/
I. Existing Bridge
X . . . //
.. . . . r — _ \
OR '
40116A. .,�. \
H x-.
/ �xsls Old Bus ,
' . Iy9 Q Branch
Pond 4 t /:"` ��I�Q 00
\ / / ! \
_ / 1
P/ ' / • \ I
• .. ( / \_ _
. J
\
0 , cc
41..,at`
4 S. 1320 :721.4,
•
z i
'a.
7326, Fp
• .. .. ❑ellverence'BiAfisf ':ra1!ar
•r.� .. •i :, +: r a -s1
2018 Aerial Photography .,' :1,, p t'� '
. °ewer
Figure 2 Site Map
li
W I L D L AN D S Huntsman Mitigation Site keitlp
ENGINEERING 0 250 500 Feet N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I I I I Wilkes County, NC

1
_ Project Parcels
Proposed Conservation Easement
y i -. -• -
11
-�; I II •
. 04.4.....ami + I
#1,40000:„.T. - b.
/Fr/
i AP
11111S14,„ iii I / ...'" .' .. -.....-
a.
I
r r f I ►
Nr +
I 481111.110P I .
1
I I + r 4
I 1 (LIP
I \ ,
I I F ► r~
I 1 ti
I
i, 11.. )14\ 4%sid 41111411111
• I
! \ \ f _- 4I
\ Nramiro"."
or Ale \ \
\ \ { _.
\ \
NIII14i.molf:oellirIIIIIIIIIIt
\•• .\ .
N_
a\ \
. , ,.•
. ,
..,
• ' - r
` 4
4*
, 20 0
iii
.........,....„=„1„.
i _ \� ---1��.
a _
\-- -' / \
—
Nair _.. - v. _ g*.if i_41 k
OOP
I , \ N.
`�
)
r
11711111 %. - _ ,
ir
•
I• .I bftilibiftIMINUM.15a1"Iiir
Z
NSIL
Iklig: Figure 3 Topographic Map
VV I LD LANDS Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 250 500 Feet N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I I I I Wilkes County, NC

a A
Watershed
UT1 70 AC Project Streams
Non-Project Streams
Topographic Contours (20')
K
North Little Hunting i.+�. I
Creek 1 274 AC "`* " ' _ P ' '
r .: 5' .
it •
i
Iiiiillibit
L \North Little y 774p .- �. -�
untin9 Creek_z- . T..,- , L. - y.-
L. '- -Jr= Old Bus Branch - 5 AC illp# ,
-0.•
_ /
�'
— - .
_
1 r Barn Branch 10 AC
722p - ,,
1320 ✓ 67
.. - �ti - 7�'0 � .y am` -
7320 °i �, 1 _
M1 .' . -
c UT2 ;�1' 42 hl ��
• V -
43 AC 7.3 .s..,R .• -
- �, 'A , t�
- t Rifle Trib 12 AC
..01.,r v 1L S.X'd' y t�.• ';Y .= .. ..it,,, vilref..'4. 1 i :
fi Jt Y h� % L.is..iik,.=
'.,
y, $ itC ii �\i�`; ,;,= 4c.<<-Rak'''"•-m:rs --
I 0.4, `` � : '� '' = - Trapper Trib - 2 AC ..�'1
r -%<51?°
--> --'' ) L7I
0 0 oo / X - _ :? t :• : "• fl'
1I00: o 1 300 �' .
1500 - L ; -- - Y1300� ,
1700,
1700
i 1700 7800 _ ...
t j , o .0,"
Figure 4 Watershed Map
�'Nly WI LD LAN D S 0 200 400 800 Feet Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I I I I I I N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
Wilkes County, NC

_ Project Parcels
L_ : Proposed Conservation Easement
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
_: Non-Project Stream
r_ . ,k
'`" Existing Culverts/Piped Stream
4 ' . •10.4' CoA-Codorus loam, 0 to 2%slopes, frequently flooded
dor
FaD Fairview sandy loam, 15 to 25%slopes
` +� ' - : "^ II ' FcC2- Fairview sandyclayloam, 8 to 15%sloes, moderatelyeroded
;r. . � p•�Y UdC- Urban land complex, 1 to 15%slopes
.:� �;+'" � I 1 W Water
'ti rN 5 r
:;; �• n
. ' 1 ,5, I Existing Pond
\` '�
i;
r� I
I 1
it I
FaD
I
„.%.;,4,',,.\i,..4 0•.LL„,.,,,w;4I.,,-,,A--4
''s.'•'.7,,-'I.v••',4•%,•rA..'••v f,.'•.AA',.
4.,,N,c,41/4,•.,•,1_-.,.
'i."
\\\r--
Ao,..._
fit, \ 41r
• - 4 . .. \ \W ;'I 1►,
a eall • \ 'x ,T '1
UdC
—\\313D
�` „ ` . } r� reek Reach r
` - Nun ` — — —
' fsr,-- . . North Little N -- —
•
.,... . ..
- r,N-w rt. 4'r .• -K 1
} , k kial. ....,... ..... _:,.. . ...,,
..,:.__, .
,...
. . , ,,, I
........ , ...
'., '-, 'i, m I , _ Old Bus
1 Branch :.
_ .
_ / ,
•,:, , r
„ . • l /.
40.
'si, ;k . 1. /.X -A.1'IA .•• i / / ' /
wii,r'O
2018 Aerial Photography '' ;• ,�y Iz': 4, °���0"'nee
Figure 5 Soils Map
WI L D L AN D S Huntsman Mitigation Site
air 0 250 500 Feet
E N G I N E E R I tJ G N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I I I
Wilkes County, NC

•r'- Gray son Galax Pa ail'r c k Martinsville
;
— � yr henry.
— r _. y 4 ?g 4,�e VIRGINIA
,l' 7
IYORThI GAFiOLINq .,1r "s35fi5 R —
ra �,/� '� f \liver ? Allegh any I
.'Johnson_ r ..�,r FnSx - - •
•• -�r S r k rf
[f r. 4n 1r4 I'.[AIf,yrlta Sur r
0 re4,// F - _ _ -_[Stith Park Sl ok es Rockingham , :•
e fi - — 1•y i - ! —I - •_ '. L i
Lake fC.
I
I
Agony Acres UT1 Reach 3 F••
r.;, .l y Shew Tributary A - - -
%-
Timber Tributary -
-
F��rs�Ifl
:Y.'i'e•ir - )/
Ironwood Tributary
I
' UT to South Fork Fishing Creek I
Burlii
Huntsman Mitigation Site Winston- Greensboro
• ..i:.1 •::II _ - - Salem •
1750 f[ w r Al am an
:f•N S ?' 1
High Point Guilford
•..r` Ale Lenoir Era.I e Foust Upstream
Burke - -
'11.
' UT to Catawba River Reach 1
\..
.4 ` . Statesville r. ,i s, n
,
Lake
,' :Jame Morganton "�-• UT to Catawba River Reach 2 '' 4�[
❑eel
Box Creek Mainstem Brrpo1(t rd - - a. 1
Asheboro
Salisbury'-
A)
Henry Fork UT1 Upstream Rowan
UT to Kelly Branch ?17g Ff
5rate Park �h R an•� I fi h
MooresvilleI- - - ..kE
2\61N26 R LP n c c l n Norman _ 89b# _ _
UT to Gap Branch ::"I.•
µ„.r
Ru'her Fotd _ Concord
• Cleveland - '
- Cabarrus
=..� Albemarle
Shelby �:< To I Rocky Brie
x •
Gastonia Sr an l
•
9,00 r ur Charlotte rF I,
Figure 6 Reference Reach Map
1d0011V WILD LANDS , Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGiNEERING 0 7i5 15 Miles Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I N
Wilkes County, NC

Huntsman Mitigation Site Design Discharge Analysis
10000 -
■
■ ■/
wooX
X
y= 100.64x°1615
X R2= 0.8769
X y =55.699x0.7855
a' 100 X R2 = 0.9931
X
o
X X
10 X
N
♦
1
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Drainage Area (square miles)
• NC Mountain Curve • Alan Walker Curve x Reference Reach Curve x Qmax-Existing Site Streams
• Design Discharges Power(NC Mountain Curve) Power(Alan Walker Curve) Power(Reference Reach Curve)
Figure 7 Design Discharge Analysis
Huntsman Mitigation Site
Yadkin Basin(03040102)
Wilkes County, NC

_ Project Parcels
II „_ ___1 Proposed Conservation Easement
r a , �A Existing Wetlands
,:
Internal Crossing
i, Proposed Restrictive Covenant
•
• 1 L, •
,dry
Ai '
�'
vW
•$ Stream Restoration
- — Stream Enhancement II
!'� No Credit
K
Utility Line
,.. Topographic Contours (20')
+; ® Reach Break
` ,; _ At_: * Proposed Stormwater BMP
,.• .;_ .. [. N.
,. - , ,..i ,v, iz.. . I ' 164, ft4,01,-*A01 "`'''''.1" -1,,,
le,.
, I
' ={:F' • -,. 1st; - 14t+s ... _ I 1 , _- „ .ter
x. .. \ \
Lv
it . .
•
)0. •
li . ., .
. :7\ c,1 [
•
s.
1' , r‘P, •Z .. /0/- a a ,.
r'� ItV - . North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
• - 4 6 , • .,
- - - - - - \ ,,- -IE
11
/ / '7.
' 1• /
elk
d.
" Q t►r9C ' //
ti — .. . e Nvn /
''' lir 1 iit: H \ ::
B � 7 ':; ' : "'•� . Y SP Old Bus
tiw' � 7.iw, ' :i'S Q Branch . ...
_} °i. Wit• ..k /
r- -% L
1
Ilk, c •
_ ..
. ...,.,.. ... .• ._.1. ..,...t.r,,,s,,. ,,,,, . .,, , . ..: . L . .•: ,. . , ,..__ ,. __ . .
..,. ,t .,... ..,...,. _. , ..... . ,1
..: ,,,.\_. . _.. '
- - t. •ANsf Eli f]r M1- `•+ :� _ `.. .y.....tY .
2018 Aerial Photography • ; .L: :2 °' , ',r, .ere..c = _ • y ' . •k
e e4aii, c c • . 132
Figure 8 Concept Map
W I L D L AN D S Huntsman Mitigation Site awr0 125 250 500 Feet
E N G N E E R I tJ G N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I I I I I I I
Wilkes County, NC

_ Project Parcels
1_ I Proposed Conservation Easement
Existing Wetlands 9.
Internal Crossing ■
t Y ;e;' Proposed Restrictive Covenant
• VfirI.
i m —tt Proposed Fencing
3 Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement II
."2 0 ? 4 No Credit
'o .;.;,h, 9 ❑4 Cross-Section
,,,,:. •: .. ,:,.a;•,: fir' II Utility Line
A
II ll Topographic Contours (20')
f II� Reach Break
�. / ' Proposed Stormwater BMP
:.'a;4 .: e #� ' Stream Gage
i' 1
" • w' XW vs Crest Gage
tk
-s 0 Photo Point
` ,, `A" 'r. 11v, 1 A• , ill ___ Vegetation Plot
�•_ k ., wt •... O
�.,: a �,;;'Y ' II Mobile Vegetation Plot
it'J,St .41111 _ I - e A
fi - ;,' -y-. L'. • j ,Esc U , --- .,....mt •••• •"-.•
ti \ 4 -\\
4 ' '..1, IA,'. , `4.rd,4.L., f...._ 4 -. \\ \t\
,'' Vi' lht3.' Vit* \\
�: t. .
1 \ .. __a... ,, t ,.,h
.. \r,,,,_\
'''444���444 .a
• till 04 +1 '} Iy',! North Little Hunting Creek
i. `' v, , ,, �� f /• Reach 2
'1. it ..f- irk .. \ / �, � P^r"� - -w -LL•j,
*s., 0., ,Esl_.,„Vz3 %- '
-\' ,,__ -....-•• --- '2Z." - '
pA.
4.
Little
' _...A : f^,,ifie .. • (--• +1‘,. ,,
. tilloa
F .. „:,...., . , __ ;.,.v.:.,...k,,_ _ ,. le . A :
. _...,
___4______a /.„ . _
, ti-+. / ,\ ,,,,, . _ _ , _ .
, _ ___. _. ___. . , \ ,
*t_ :
' ,'a I' _ .. _, 01410 , ; . , r . ,••, , iIi,. 4,.----- Q \ `'' Old Bus r
I;::: � ��. ,�: , Branch
t "e•,, \i-q•-1,,k,,,
•
-�1 0 � \
f4 '''E' *.\
r• _ _ 13,
`}i ,; ., W . .$' , a
/Vt"
alik -
11Pr'''' '''' 461-44'4 t:
a, 0
a
r, a :--•• y
2018 Aerial Photography - - -.. , . '... , ,:fit.r �''I "`or 4 .
epr+ir y 03
dr"? Figure 9 Monitoring Map
W I L D L AN D S Huntsman Mitigation Site
0 100 200 Feet
E N G I N E E R I tJ G Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I I I
Wilkes County, NC

APPENDIX 1—Historic Aerial Photos

'. ilw - 11111111.7
l 0 % .....•
'r 1 .
I. .1 r..I ,..' ',' •r • 4' ..)• ./ .
11,4 N '•,"iiik•tiiit „-6 ,.,, ,. , ,i, 0 .-v• tf vk
ille.
•
*Pt I .. i°,. „W „.4701 '. r* ).• .j'. .1, .V 1 .P;•• wh Oi
1.'N %-'r-; . )• L.) li• d J4.1-6viM • - ', ; v'. ....toil"' ,2.t4.'..e : • . 1.40 ' '
„. 4, . •Lii , .. ... 4 4 I-4,-L. ,, .4)
, t.!1,.! .,, ,•..,;•. :
tkic
- ' -A..... •'L. ..,.., , i,,..I•, if
,e '.:'•' 11'`':'.-••
1.-V:*.i”:1-)1'4,.'' .-;'-e .' 'a k d'• ...,. '4'n9:A . .
' • .'' •:QT.r ,1- i
• I
. .
j,
. . .
klik\sKi4,
...it 'oy•t.1,'-v,i';,-,:l.:$ '. 46 • ' - dr"
s -, kr;Aa....•••,.!...: i, I. • , ' 't
if
.• .
tit)
IlliiIIIIIIINN..
. .,
1,..1..-!..1' .
. . ,
1 1 1 i' •
-•,P". :i q.:.,4' Oft, WA".-1.4?ii,,r40.$4, 7e'lk. . • •
. L 1 - 4 ..• .1 4.autw°
- 4 w:ii:
.. .-....__P•••
1r 1 • el
is . •)•t• ,;'-'4 ' I_ \ 4
,. ....
,111 Ail
- . •. .
-'
•
'. ./'• 4* ?.I).'?..kq. .eaf''• lite.... '
1 _../ ---.- -
L "g TII.
• r
. .
• -• • . . ,;40, •
‘4\- • 44,1 141 '-.''
' 4i-i .i -. •
• .
1 '.
,t,,.• . : ,......t.,_,,) ig i . . . Iri/ •
0. . .
- •..... 1 , ;
Iller 4 . • •
ii•,
• -PT .•....,/ le i ,A ,-.0 I.... • i
• 4 , • '. u "' - • ---
1 - .• % r....V7
. it• .
• ., -.,. .irife e .
...r
. i • I
, .
• , f _ 41**(491.7.4 gli
di Olio.
- i
1. g ) • .e
_. ,.
..•• • 1..,._:II"' ok" •:6•-
__ -d. -
a ini_AN. • Iv...
' 1-.....ip,.6.4jte , i . 4
) 4 .,*IIIC '
.•
, ,will. t ' Ji4 •,jr!.
,,. MI • IR a&-•• .
. ,..V.
• 14 ,• +Pei
. . 1 ••; q1ie 4'.MI
4 •
A. ..
IR • "ii I •
• ' -,0, 4 .%011;41111R-44 -%-
_
1146- '''1:641"41.4.4-41;11,002/4,*." - ,- •fAilligKini. .
- is•
i • ,
,...... ,
. -• •
••lit-<. v.".'- `1•ii • x;61.11, '-, - • it,- . _
' SP 4•••.,.••••• --$... .:4- ,.... • ii, , •.:•:- lig f .
ft v dd•IA'. ,..)P• V , . . ••• .. •,, lei ii„ - ' •:1 ''.
.
°'4 1 t •' '- ,•4‘114'-',' ...1 , . ..•,• .
-it, .'•Pi;.416, -,•!,,I, I, I,i0,',•.V 'lip, • ' . 4• .. . . 1,1
44414$$: . . .. i. -.-L-
.;•'•"4,',.-§6 .r.71E •4#•-•.-"•• - . ‘ _
-.%44. •. 41/4,.-1.44.
i•-•4.0s'-•'-0.•?..--vi?,.ii 6-.ci4r. , - • - _ •••• •
1. $
.
tili L'ir•i„,t. 4,4,;4Q2'0,',',14, . A ti.,•- -- ,,,,,
:;-.-
., ..yt;-,.•.,. ,;,•,... t.x....-...-0. t., ,,,,k AT'. ' 0
• L i .: 1 jel‘k 1,..1&••rii•41.' .. 4, • ,,t y" .
''''k• 1:- -ki ‘ol'-Pr,i! lr',43,4' "..',' '• .1 k? , '*4 — i .'• 4 . t,
'11'•-k•L'i)-It'q'',.+4014t.f?A";.• '' '11,- .'` -... -' • fl"..1", " t -
- ,....
1.-.--', ,.,:.1, 10..-.E'2•',.,.1. . .- .. AA '4. At .,.14; . ..- ,a ., _
- •-i .• 0 l. ..•• 6 '•-d.-
•
•: 1:k •6 •.4.•:. . .'• ••• .' . •.i k '.' . 'Z.1 . 1" ', ''.ag.'ll 'N.' ,44 r :1'.','..,k; - • • - 1 A t.1-• t• .1 Ft -'• ' —a.ini ' N.,:ii,"'..,- •
..i ''411(' L)iP-, . ',' i'1%,--,..''.'otiodkrtT.4f„"s1"Sii ':w1.-31 ' 'it: 4-..:'-'4'fit,rrg.I. 4 ,L''. „, . r• . :1:,, 1,7.
,4
•• • ri-t. ' v s' . s) I - - d ). 0.4 - i-to, sr . . -:.
4:.” -1._ — ' •.1! -11.•,7r s ..t. • 14,, I • -. - r.
.- IP .P Ilir `-.,' *-pir.'-Y P. ' , •'.0-I.'.',1,11...1,4•4 C „,. ;•%-; •,.,., 1. 1 .
_ . .
• , ..
'
....•
it
• 4
4.- •
NQUIRY# 5562675.5 •_ .
,. p••.1
i N 1, .0.• '-' 'I,--.•'r
.r
YEAR: 2016 •
. L.
i =500 CEDR . .
11,
-,• •. .. 1-r•.
' L. -,

' .
•-• .,-_
. . , • , ' I_ .
-.... -
? A
•"•,i;-••ir*Ar•IV••rt,iAJ 1,114„rg:410• vi.i. ir.'•r. .•rk *. . • - • ..... .... J-
_•'''..,f Y.'2,,• ••••t;'--..-4. f. -‘•WO• l':' ,.;14,i'4/7 t,, -#:". '..`• '' . • . - ... .
- " ..
• , .d•i
...s
•fi' ' -,-' •".. ',',., '•;..e. fr ''...•;....e= ..... i.
11 ro
'--'5',':'e! • le
''..,' 0-17-• ' - b ---
.ft\az:r•r?'
.
.
, , 1. ' r ''"ii ' ,•
, f •y ,\ N• ...x. i
.../.4, . .. 1.6. .i....., ' ' .IV "•F ' .1. • -..l.,. ''41.) ,1.--- i' VI' • .....i• J. ei.,...., ...
';7 4.' ,f ' ' • •
. '
. , • •1 I'M,t '- i' ! 1.'" A •pf
. .
...,
licti•j_r4;.,40,Cc. ..i.A' . ;fi,
.,,- •• ' s,..;
,...s i •. - „v.:. .,., ,
111 j•P.. .111 ''."NC-2-.4 I
t ..:6 . . •.,,....:. ,ii:'.-'..),'''''..;,..k.,,,„1.,joi,/ ..,,„ ,
i,-,•• r..5,'4:ttyP.-;:::';';',....:,4..:ti:Jej.,,. .e'll..:: ' Tit- .! . A.''''''''''',•°44-..i.,,,y.prA„,.,...eiorc?f, ,....,1.. 44,... 4.
:_•2.. •-:,i;.;:._iir ,. .. , 4.,' . c IbT 'I.' '''.4' "I I:j....: (
_ ;f:‘4
riti'l, 44... tri s. ..--,".
,...k.4,i., •
. .... _ -. ,,,,:- . i .....„.. ,,,)..,,,......, • . tip Ili
11, ' i
4 ,...
:"'
•
- ft 1,.' •••;,.. -- ' -
..
,...... •1p,,,,,,,r6.ffit't,•Zr•I. i A 2
•.'4 .- I' •
-Ats.c. \,, , .•_ _,.4.,' '','.4i'A '
1k3461
t. ILL .1........„.... j
, •••#\\Ifor _.. i.,4..1,.. • ft.
glit ..,..
..,01- ,... • -- -
i
• ,
•
e t
•iv d'i".• :. Allet.-..fl• I
tt:i l',1104/rekir-... , 2 , 4J 'f, .• liket
'kV,
'c-l'.
w, r 4114 46- iftair'.•A44 ..St, 1. d$,''iNt' .4 ' .
•pt
...
- .
P fr ir 'd.A•J. r.
itr, -e, WI 41 At.-
7 - 'x. --
1 !
', $,444-,r,k4,4. . •• ... .„...
ii'v . •
„y.,,,•:1,.!..4?:,...r, ,. • . 4k. 1141210".T.4,-ft i ••
•••6,1''..,•/;: , ' ft" .. t,.1. f..f
,i
, .1 •0 •• • .3./elit 7#i'. %kV.''.. r
: JOS'i i;A.Otir • -'-1.0:, IV gime% -, ••,..ir
,d,,,,..,11.).p., ,,..it- -_..e.,,i• .,i,
40,-- . / . r , .....,.....
,q1._ .0... . i.M.. .., •'-'I'41
4 .4 fhp
. 11-
" .,-- :----
..YO'Z'....• ....• =,;ik. ....
1 ,2 I •
' -• - 0...- •.
WIttjit IrMtirtiry
:• ? CE"....01nOr-4441714 :
.. ' *-• • 1 T
"-..... . ..•!., - -' ..
C- .
..../ it'.' I , . • . . . - .,. - • . F
_ ..,,_
- • .1,•..k. 1 Li.7 4' '''''•
7 Yob . ' , ' •• , 'S ,-:1„ill l'..'..'r ..%.'.
,... ..i#,,.., :).,.,,,I., ,,p_ .-a,,L '*• ••• - '
11).41114 t''''
. ' 'itiecl_ft..',...# ..,, ,-,:.,r.- -: . .• ..- , 0..
-,--. -, • T ,
• ' '4..." 0 PI i t•irifjoh.' Vitiiiiir
rt,-,._e -)0114' 0_•,,:d.1,,,,j;k7;1.‘,A.„„,, .: , . .OP-Tr-- ..,.4,0 ,-.
,e1.1
r•-k .....y4,),,,. , '.. ..,-/,-„r-1.,.•••„ or :....• „... "'m ', ...:' 4 i,
•1...•' i,4 451111.111,Ai A e.1.," 4r ''' • .." • ',J• . '
4
4V: •0 e . r ' As i. .•.9• ._J.-5..!
!I i • ..,7:- 04,8,34„pl..,,k,. If . rit,..1%. •.:•-,!... ..i.:-....v.,-,.- . _ ..„..• ..,.. ...,‘,.,, -- g ,. ,- s nil f
4111
1. I. ,#,r1..r• ie I p.•1,1. •,ri...,;_r., .,.v. . . . .
jr.
I
.
. o lie
...
. e
J •
.: ... A. '" A _1 A.*Joh. • , 1. . '..,:* t..• - .. If r: .,
' ' -- .4 "
..., •ri• e„.. ' -Vit. vr,••,kr. At& .. .. • ,ii. 2'•.• . ,. '
4.. .,••
AL, 4,-.15.: IN,,: , -`•..:. . i . ,. p.
• --d, . •;IR, '.:•+• ' •,. i s 1
, I ' . • ..'? 1-4, :;. i.; : ' r
41-”' L.* %P., ....4..,',,a, t. ,•• -:.: 'A ••' .. .. -•• •ri: 'f -
A ?if
. a , . 3,.., ..
yi • ,.,.. . , of p-fif$,,,v,...ktl '13*;:i...4„,ii-7.„...v.f4,-;,;. ),4i4ri--.7.1,,,,.-4...t. ,,,,,, . „. - , A.. d“ ..? il:,M. •;it'v,;., - tio#
. i., „ . E ,. ,,i ,.„,,....ty.... 1.,,„ .„. •. •-.1,,,.../.".., " 44:11.. 8,-...),?..:(if .).•.,.„....-ii*„.....I.V.A.-4 '4:il,•4,:jetr'' ,-..;, 4 '' 11i;',W .....I;-.1• -:•':.VW...a
• 4• . II' : • 4 4,••iif•Jil‘ .. IV-Pi!". " 70AP.io;* i •vf 1"- • l''"g'-'''s " •-- •.' ''r. •Sifir/e. ' - ' -1 ''. '.'0 —
,In - ...., , ..-147 ! -- .•• ,/-,L. . ..,,. i•PL, .4, '•.t •A . 'sir t
, - V -- - .ei 1i- 0 ' Jet '4 l• • , • • • • IQ,•- • 1.4:..t,- • ' • • e• .'• -3r.•4 J. .. .-k. ••"Ca ' : - ' : -b en.
tio
,. . .% ,ts .. , . 4 ... ,,,,,01.1Ar v ..... .,.,._ , .4 ... .., . .‘,...g....,..
t A. 0, . ,,iii_IL., t - , . L. -.0 . -,0-Aii. . - 1., 4 f' • • e I it • -- ika - - ,
' • ' '•4 ' 1 — '' vi A:441 • ‘,Iirif'' +II A.' Lq A "5-- 1 '. • • ' di
• . . . ,r441-.... .-_.:-_,..; :0- 1 -,•:... _ it,...,......):: -, 4 .‘ • ...._
-!:,,, ., A. 4.,. . 1 : ipi4L 4.'.. . V. .41 .-' : f .-.0L ..' rivi . ,. -4..7;r. ,',-.4 aL,..‘ It. Jar, - ' 6 'kor. ''' • ' -r '- 4.-
i ,,:. 4 fl• f,,,e,,t,‘;, -;. r . .4., i )0 - , ;40. t-...s. ,. .. .,,.): . . *r, ."---,. .---1-'•,/,.--- , ' lig .A.,,,... ,T., --dL •elf " ,..' fl
.4 34:0 iill:!': -.Ali ki'.4!;°44,:?..d?"di 4-i 3,4'4.''''' '_w •• ,irie,i- -" 'w41-,
0
.4 r- itir" :,,V•.51'1'."kr' -'' ,.. ) "? ' ••, 'AP -• , 0
. i''''''''.. -r- 1:.1illf‘.'5'4.-It 4 .' ' ..'4/%641r '6''.. • . AP:. 1-1:14.....i $ . -'':ell?' ''•%''L''.'Y•t'.14 f It.4 0';.4. ' W.' '...;.4- Li.l.. 3. I j :• •Ir• 4 '
)
-1;15,1 t' s•i1,41 Vik,'°;.4'‘ . ' • + „4-1.AVI: jr •.. tA,1" )4)VIV et'An If-ij I' 4.1i4i.:,:"9 AV.,k 51•1-.g i . 4.. : . 4144):4.1e.' '';
''}' J t.'iti..,±..i,'.4ii,.. ,44-f:41..ta Y.,',,cf;f1A , : :: It' ,,1 r 014' ..1,4....11.-gui.4.,);.:.,,.:LI u,.? -..,,4it. , - , . :0„ra.. --,k;-IA it.#,-;i:le3A,. . •x
it
.,... . •rwits.-1. 4,, .
-, to,- . .. ,. -,--.,--.. -,-.._.., ,1)_7.: f, ,- ,---1'.. ..- s L. _ti Lts...qp. ,i, .d.-1..c.,,- V.,'1, 4:0-1 ' r- '••(4.-°: ./ ''"L. It t '
.$ ..i • cf T..3,i11,••31",- A'
.0t.. otsg- ui..fAxv :4.... 4 •...--4
i N id, 1
jrij.k ) IIA'S.10:- • 4#...r...!-,:,,,- .1.11z. . •1 ,07 - , • •-• :or', .,..„,- 4 ir ...-- -
YEAR: 2012 '- ,, -, _ - , ) „ .. ' --.'.. -, . , 'ie; 'fk,54*..1 ' 711,'' ierfrik- ri-,:ios'filite• ' '
'h-r ,..,,...)4 s ,fr, 1-. ,,,-i 1•,,,,.'.. . •c*katif ,i4 ----V.J.-•et:41.:•,1 •:' %P.,.$44 %' - .0.-
CE D R 44:0,..7.•0-...‘ -4 5: rt .1. ••11.1.,A.,. . • A. •.i.' , . (41. !41". , 0,.1 r.;,-,,r.N:,5%I..).., ,,, . 4, ir, p r..
1 —500' :P.'• . • • •!ceS

t
rlei - ' iij,
. i N ''..` '•,ti
i.
+I L
• °,�T . f ''�l6.i 4 .A - `fir 'f
141,,, itlfil••,...-A • 4,
_,.. 4
Yr �15' •
gw... .' . 7 : Atm 1.4•U!..tick"" -,• • •-• & "--
*. - ..-.Z4 t t!44' 4'::
A •�v ly\ .11:Yei"
a'y'�jYy�, lk,� .�5'
•
4
;,..-v-g.
*it
_., -.110� �:'�r' �i. .. l. � '''''..4
`tip.
.,..a • , .•SIT?,. ''. It•N 4r.„ . ''. No 'NE .;/.` ..-„rt ,,_ 4CRS.'11%1
■ Ili A,S ._ �. s•N' �!'I: _ -� ^� •
41.i. 4 %
ti •, tir ,to,+ ,is ; i 'r
. `, ;iD'J'' y'. ''4�1` 1, N''..'▪K" tip: A ; .".., .. �' :
•
i+ �.. L-
Iu . 4.34
l _..+ .t
, ,
S • •' • yr ;:! i •rlc
- A. I44__
• .
•
.3"I; • ' 1.11 ' 44-01,. ...•-r-kt: - • ET L� /
,....
- ..,_,,..f, , --4. ,, „,_. ,..
..1:,:t
. iTA .. kci
•
•
s •; i .t
i
:. ..:_ .,.,. ,
. „ii.„ ,,,,„k.,„._:.. ..,,......„ • ... ..._ _ . ..
• ,.ii, r i 1• I: .....67 1,4,1: ' - . ;;-_,I, 4.4.1:.: •.:--...... -
.-Ci le 11 it' k t:t.1iy.r4,..,, . •-..,.,-- -7,..!',=-4.-, , ..- -.-1,tit*- ....
4.41,11
ia
$li:•'•
1T .�'t1 •'''i ir
il,,,
L. �i. ' 1'�' .i'Jr 't 4. •' 'F ,. �• •'s V-.!.'. 4 A. ! -%f-+''- i - •
i; } .',,,f•j1,. }�' !•. ,:• 4 7.- •k,,,. sty 'f� 'h: G` �' 'f`: sr'_.4 -
, p.,..........,,,,,..4 ....,4. i n t .....,.;Li t •!.ii i..1t. i,.% ... -• A, ......../14: Ai.AA; ...4.# ‘,.,I, 1-,.• 7 .-1 .,,,,.. 4.4 1 • • .r.z.,......., ••
,ii . ' i•• i (..v, % '. 1.1"'-‘itli.ott, .'. ii •e4t'' 1 ''' * •41 qi 4;'''' '0141•041;i:. - • r" ' Nit 'L kk fl,1:1":' ' . -- •-• '
,�, �!' •S �T • �••rrrti'4 1rr \ ?} r • ,, i 1.4 • :4. .1 l 'j. ,r ` 1.i �4- •4 / -• tIpt.fa:/01
A14-M1ij•�Jf, •,1.1.! 'y r �n1,.
. 11-4-f,
1NQU4RY#:5562675.5 : 4''' +.j,.' x ,*' +, $. • ,�1�• '- .,•;f; i N ti 1'.'
N ,
. .,•
YEAR: 2009 ',; r.*,_JqS,.. ',. 1'ti: .4,,"' 44-• 0` '
=500' FOR •,,. :'YR. ',.*all'
•y);- .� '' •''� • "•'-' ;a ,." " '/''''s .y}• '
'-., {•.

J 1
IF
• i.; i' 1...t ,. ; r"1. Ok k ..•
tIr..... A i. - • '.• ' ' L, ..' '' .0 : . • ..0 04,1,i5q04&" •-• , . I
4,
J} I i„Itfo ;1.;re . ' . 44 ,.
, — ••• '. '.4.,P-..,'0, e ,.. it) .,
F.
1411'' \ i m1.1. . .
: % ....411 1 , _mt.,
Ir.%. ' • 11 ' .: .• ... iiii7jitit:T' fi4trir,
.71\:111 -I 4 1 '
a.
•
, ... , . .. r - a' •�� "' is i
40
ilsire,; . •:\s .
,. , ...
, .. . ...„ . ,. .,.. ..
i •e.*1, 'h.-%
- -t .J / t:'
A. ♦■
'4,414/1411k4 , "1:_l!t A- - 4. ;
-
•A ++
. ..'.r,ii ,,,,,t311. ,tivv., _ .. , ..,- ,.4 , 01,.... ,..A
.. .. . x.,
. , , ....., . ,. ., ... 4 . e . • it illf,(4.x.4 ..; Fe
, • oili,•
lin ., ,•RI•s • ,I 0 "JrC'u ry. r, j • , + g; r ,� ,� TJ i�� �' .J *.11 r •�R' 7r
004:;:•)Irir _ :--, - lit i ? erlif-.61-f•,.?' ,, . , . .- .i - 1r 11%; fdl..., i -' .',,,-. .. r
., ,..
AW:...o'ri d''' •• I -0-'0' ' . '- ' *' ' ''-‘ -i V"'"fe'i*- ..•,„„,,,e-...t. . ‘,,.,1,.- .k. ,i • . r.
INQUIRY#:5562675.5 r., ` _II 7 r' ' A r S� . it. r� ,S4Sf', 3',
YEAR 2006iiiip .i" ' v , • 4, .- 1'* '•, ,�
r• _ 1, , t • • • ►,; `,� { 1 r.
;r r f •{ }-!i#.f{ A r�sr I.
=500' FOR �l • '• r % a T. '' t {`

r .o ..emu t
•
' A I
{
MC) � . �_`.,.
•
•
4 • t Plk '
•
•
•R' '.era - . A -
7111tir: 4?,.:„.,,,,, •- :,.......
•
..*..... 'Ai
4 3 ,
y.
`�' ilk ` '3 Y
.
is ft
...
�
",i!.. _ }per ' . �' 4
aF
" .
#, 1 ��
Ivy�7.--- P 4;
a ice. \'•,•.... �. f _ - 'M�Yv _.-^`
'"X,„{ ,y'_ ,fir.
, • •
-..-• .... 1'" */ '"
_
MI `` 5�y yl
, yam -w" r=� ' . -.-. i° if'tee' sr 'r
A.
r+ t a
a '�.L •.. •.t.4•. 'r1'-
, .
INQEJGRY#:5562675.5 >• •
YEAR: 1993 . .;
i N .0
K� '.
=599 EDR ,

- .
/ 4
. . ' 1 \ I - • T. . .
' . . ' ' - . L: ' \
. ® ' � �' •, : 1
1 • .
; 2 ;. I
, -
& . d.
� °"
ea� ,
� � . . .
i 4iiii:
. 4 41, 2 . . _ \
I �� �. 4 . � , ,
•
. . . .
; . '
It 6 .
4 ' ' ��
, . ,, Ilk/V.
- ' . |
— . * � � �
N `, •
:1111%
. , . ' s
. _ | \ •b. | . i % .
e ' . .
1 i is . A f .
_ @
.1 ,
. f
. . ? ,
•
•
_ J.
. . ., -
. I • � .
I.
, . _ .
11.
.. .,
. , . - .
. ,
' � � -
IN
j I' . . . ,
lik
, • t - . a .
.-1 . , . ' r II . ' ilt •
Alp , --- - , I ._ a
, . ,
f IF ' `
1111
f ! I . L
1 it s \ . , z 2 / Or
�_ , .& , .
' � } .• ' ,
d. %�'.;. fillik
' t ,
) . ".
, - : ' � � ( � % i • • , I' -
4. . • . | �N. . 0 , .. •
il ,I . r
1 % - �. ` •4 ' - • •41 / •
II . ,
�
&4
�
INQUIRY Ks+m33 i N _ y '
YEAR: lye
, =mE /oR .

0.
e.
fi
' .Y .,\ •
.
•
• ti
•
1 41Ip
`
INQU4RY#:5562675.5 i N
YEAR:_1963
I =500' EDR

' 5
..
..--
. -
-.... .... ..'''.--7!"r.•. .
•1.,
. . •
NII.,
- • • Ar•ffill- .
i •..-;....„. .....,. _ ... '%. 116;-',',
. . .
.6;--;4-.J.-...j.,• ...•'• --.., ...--'" •
' : ..10:'-”,•'', '-.45- ' - • - •
'-
.
.,
-••
-!441.-o-- -_.- -
• . ,
.iii;• . .,••11;.t. '. ,,..."-'''--- . .. --. ..
•P----40. :•. - 4.-. - .- -Lc- . - -r .16_:''
L'.;•";-.. ••4!--'
". ," .d. -.0.....- ' • ' .. •
I .4%.-;'`-r• --
.•.-21....-.--, r-• fr.f‘r•-k'''.... 1 -: ' . •fie.A.. . ....... r• ....7.- • • _ ..
. 1..- .
Ar .. • •
'.2:t4 :••.1114 4 ;L n••••49%, . .•.•, • ...), • elS'r 7./4,
r• • _•• • -
......
• .
•
•••• . .
... .1, _ • ... .
•• 461'r•-•.,- . -% .•
4 -..-.. 4•
.Wir
IP . 44.. .•'-',...;•i• no. ,' :
...._ . . .
• • • . I
.. .
. •. . .
4. . ••
.4.:c.....'.- . ••.: 114.. • • .
• ..••
• .•
• .••• • • ,...1..- 'At'.-; •' '•. -- .
. _
.• e i
• • •
.1.• - • i r IL-IE. •••••• . • i I
' ea?-• L......,1 :111.77.r • .
. L .
. • ' ..
. .•• . •
' •
i d ,..i'• .1
. • ; 11. . .•••. .
4 4. . .
a • ..- •11-. '. . t •'.. . t......
-
4- Fel- -xer h!. . •
6 .-., .• .
• .. r--I.... -4 .
• 1 -•-.:411.1-.4.,A ....
1 r •-•' -d• V*; '
• Altair r•
' .r• •
. •
Ai....„..
. Ili - •
. -i. • • a 1. '1".
__ _.•,_ . I.
.1. .
• •• a
11111111111111irang: i••• I•••r
- _ • . •. . • • e _, -..
•' -- .114110465,-
-.. .•t'; 7 . . .*.-• '
'..•
.44111 - • -7 . '''"..^
-ID
.. ..
41:01klig5a- _k•Tf- f$V1.C..: ., .
. . .. • . . --_
. 6
i .
• . . ;,"."'-•- • I
. .
. .•
. •• . ..
,., •,
. .
. ....: -- .
.... ...
.....4
..• ...
._ .
f F-4t:-. • 4, • • ' ' -- . . We . f-
ON ... - ' )0,414 -
.. •
ii - ' '..41111iietalc _ ..:. ......... •..61.11--_. ..... .• - • .-
r• . ..• -
•
• - • *ow ' •
411.1
--....o. .1 'r... '• r ,•41 7 • .• • -.
..„ 4.4.„,...-- lit ,.. 1, 4r . .' •
.• • a . i•11 r ...•‘. .
•.. .di • i..._ '•g• ... 7. ifa . - ,
_..eV _ . • •••. .4,r •'itP.••• .,Of ... r• ...-_..
- "
for-06. .
• ' .•. .
-• 0"e• 0'; - '.-'' .CP 4 •P .
.
le d..P. ' • ... i' ` . *
4:• •-•ii•-L-- a•., • ...
••• t V
4. W la• a'
...... r Al„.-•.-4 ...44 .. -
.... .
_ .• _ • •146;40
.di'''.2•4r- 1.4r:F-11-.:4:14.A..:41.•..:14-1 ..,a,L.''........4.. „ .;f• ...,...,41.4.4jr. ..i'l,,Ifti. -
.'
' . .e. . ... • • ....'4"'..0 •iiirr-157; .. .- A,"
• • •-; 1,4 *so,.%•-44-.-11.1r-4ir'..--*- ,.:•.:. ,r-- 30.;•44,0•.......• jir• - II%00 1.....0... 40 4Fra f_' ;• - - ?..N. .-• -...`"S _.--- . .. ' 14 • I.
. ,. •. ... ...i.l. e••
- .0 atpvilitO .a.u....'f•'•
• • .. soli .iv .:-..z4./ ...: •
.
•
. • -:.1-..s... ., . - 1,
. - . .
••
. • .,- F , ,4,,.1 •
• "
• -
. r• ' • .. ...•OPL.4.F'.'',,•...' •. .4P•Dr.o-
4.ae•r•I...•
•. - • •'1.1.
110. •-.L._ -i
..•...-I.'...:.-:
. .4 4 %
. -.-.
•
..
•-r.d. .:-'411; j.....7•••• -.'1.11 -' •••-• . -1 a • W 41. .frd -• .. '
- - •
..". •• 1•••r' A..*.`i O.te •:I. • ••• -1 III a- s43., . :-- '2"•, .-r.,d,-. ..f?
V '
•
. . i•..... It 4 .0.-'.a,•.
d...e.7F........-'.....}•
fNOURY# 5562675.5N . ••''_•.....4 6• •-•k•
, •J. ar........••-
....._.
*
YEAR: 1950 - • r •_...-.-•.
...-1..r-.
•-• P_ 'il.•
' ,....•.0.
: 1 . . r. All •r •
i -500' CEDR
'i', -.;••.1••-.j 4,.p'
...1.:.7..--..;•
-•.Li-.•.4.•-a.1 ltif1.6 •
r
.m _

APPENDIX 2—Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-00836 County:Wilkes U.S.G.S. Quad:NC-Ronda
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Ian Eckardt
Address: 1430 Mint Street,#104
Charlotte,NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-332-7754 x108
E-mail: ieckardt(a,wildlandseng.com
Size(acres) 61.8 Nearest Town Ronda
Nearest Waterway North Little Hunting Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040102 Coordinates Latitude:36.1407
Longitude: -80.9321
Location description: The project area is located at 444 Ingle Hollow Road in Rhonda,Wilkes County,North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
IZI There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403). The
waters,including wetlands have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map received via email on
1/26/2021. Therefore,this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,including
determining compensatory mitigation.For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part
331).However,you may request an approved JD,which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA) (33 USC§ 403).
However, since the waters,including wetlands have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands at the project area,which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§ 403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters,including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑We recommend you have the waters,including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑The waters,including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2019-00836
verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑The waters,including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§ 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Steve Kichefski at 828-271-7980 ext.4234 or
steven.l.kichefski(ausace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 2/2/2021.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and request for appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shaman,Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Room 10M15
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 2/2/2021 Expiration Date of JD:Not applicable

SAW-2019-00836
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0
Copy furnished(via email):
Property owner: Jerry A.&Debra Lynn Johnson
Address: 360 Ingle Hollow Road
Ronda,NC 28670
Erin Davis (NCDWR)

Project Parcels
:, - - . -. . ._ ., ,. , - 1._._1 Assessment Area
- ' ' Potential Open Waters (Ponds)
, '' `4 , ,. , • .- • • VA Potential Wetland Waters
' ' • Stream-Perennial
Sw; ---,- Stream-Perennial (Subsurface)
• Non-Project Streams
;:,.. •;. - .. Existing Culverts/Piped Stream
44. •,
; '! 'k
•
t ', .. I .: :.40 • '
; t .;:• r •, -4. k q. , ,....\\., \\\100,#,,,I,‘"
,• yolk-_,
aAot .� I
I?t" Figure 3.1 f ,,.
I .• • - . \ittr.,<14X i..iti-.:_.I.
� - r
o Waterj'j) , .
I •, J{_:- '4••+- _' -
♦ I1 ., .. - -t•� ' -7 - ,
I °O ,
+„ S
i o X Water(`3 •s S . .•
1
i II q
y; I
, '' A ....... .. .. :44,1,
„! ai ♦ • j r 1 _ — t'f
y taL�•1 .�.�' - IMF ; 7.3[J !. 1 .a, ► • # J !: .+
:1. L 1 • r : h. if
Y �� ; ' r: i i
' % P+ Yw 1 1
� t *It 1 i ` •
'*,.4 Y w 4.. r+ o Watery \•.%:•`# " ir• �'
je$
; ; .%.0'\' fj — k .....kr•'' . 4 a, jk, ' ' '
' 1? '!7.1k1. . 0 ° 4'17:' 74.4°.
ii
1. , „u.1 71 ii ♦ C •r
♦ © ! - - t
Nuntin9
i ' I.i4 t
♦ O u 4 ' •
.. •
i.. • , C P i� 4' I.
' . 36 j I**, te" 'A.:.
iV_ I c 17..E I
1 5 � '� i 11 q 1r� idl
YB' f 4 1 I� i
1 r R,
Branch '� `,
- - o Water3'• 1 =
1 41 S p ViD ' 4 e 1
ys _, -'------� i Trapper ' F - .
I \ IEI �014. - '- I
•a ::'V •,,� I Figure 3.3 .
Figure 32 �tY
. � - _-• ,1 o
��ti.:: - — - - -, — --- .I
k•_ _ . .-. ' :- d_iv__
ctzz_ C '�ii
CU
' 2018 Aerial Photography
Figure 3.0 Delineation Map(Overview)
WILDLANDS 0 325 650 Feet v Huntsman Mitigation Site 4
ENGINEERING I i i N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
Wilkes County, NC

Project Parcels
1,_,_I Assessment Area
ice'♦, Potential Open Waters(Ponds)
♦,
=� ♦"♦, �� Potential Wetland Waters
•
•. Stream-Perennial
♦ Non-Project Streams
♦
'♦
♦ Existing Culverts/Piped Stream
i� ♦'♦ 0 Stream Classification Point(SCP#)
/ ♦,
i*#I ♦ 0 Wetland/Upland Data Point(DP#)
I o" WaterQ ♦'♦
i
i
♦•♦ .• .-— . . - -.
Ma(996(1� I ♦,♦
Perennial '♦ _
Wetland oQ ♦♦♦ . 'i
I.(0.089t •
/ ♦'♦
/ . ♦
O ♦
'♦
1 CIXE , ♦
'♦ ?�
'♦ J
s.
�, F j o WaterQ ♦,•
1 1 (0.202 ♦ ..• ,.
1
T
IIkik .:,16 .
Wetland al
r I 1 (0.004
b
'
t.f ` (996
• ♦ Perennial
ir I
T
— 1`
t.
1.,h ; 1
f j
r
1
s ; ,I •
! * y
4 r f
h < 111rir).'
,
1' it ' III:54:
1 eY1 1
y 1 2-•rF . ;4., .•♦ M • ' 1.
I
r l Wetland ID 1. 4-• i_ ,.-'. , --i
* _4. o f r_ I
;,,_ �;*=ice:
S y ; on.,
/ \ N.. �i
i.
,, �. .y '
1
t . . fir
o" Water`�j `� f•
- ....eta j
- Wetland 1
�s ♦ 1 (0.019m ► ' ,
=ir
Perennial ♦, l i !_• i
1:' ''''' 4/11A
" '
s.
•fit, '^- . A.
;'-� 2018 Aerial Photo
Figure 3.1 Delineation Map
WILDLANDS 0 125 250 Feet `� Huntsman Mitigation Site 4
ENGINEERING i N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
Wilkes County, NC

- i , -.
•
o Waters ! '� • '
Project Parcels �
1 Assessment Area
vtir
�,_._, �►, Wetland 1 4
- Potential Open Waters (Ponds) I') �,, I (0.019 i ; ,,,.. �' ,;
22 Potential Wetland Waters ,�. I •_� - v�
Stream- Perennial 4 )1j. ... �'"'!
1 iii.- 6 ilk *40,,,,4,1:-
-- Stream Perennial (Subsurface) •
Non Project Streams r pp - 4k..- -0- -...:..--.c.0.-- '
`. �.. Akeialikk 4 Wetland �� " 7174
Wetland n `
Existing Culverts/Piped Stream fib - ma Focautz (0.007 (0.001 1 `'-'-:-
O Stream Classification Point(SCP#) V - v &COO i mot' r
O Wetland/Upland Data Point (DP#) � �� ^.. - '�C »DP3 i ',y
O
XY DP4 I - a
r .°•y Ufa(Perennial) -
�, / j IIIM Hunting L° O / / s. rr
liti,
•171./r-rgi--/ 7 . . .
t )r� 4 Wetland G- - •. - -
• 1 n Wetland® (0.080 A) - -- _
,'L _ Wetland[� `'-'R, g ` ".
• Wetland (0.942 aft
_ _._ — � + '� ' f1 Barn Branch ^�
' - • • • -- ' . _ ' I: .1, '_._ — ; Wetland r �,
pgiacon
_:ark, • °�' O 1 � O"' (0.004 ;...aso e
$ Q Branch r, —
_ I ^o� O (Perennial) �
)11%
WetlandQ �,_,_._._._._._I , . . `� r x�
WetlandQ _ •4. I. ,:k
(0.029 (0.737 • ;� r,
�,_ --------) o Water Q =
(0.565 Wetland d Wetland I ,'
(0.283 t 0,.
i- (0.345
ialthillatiWetland r(
DP9
- _ -s, (0.230/A 0 �;
Wetland ID DP10• 0 0SCP8
' PON LA 0E9 WO lip
•
// (Perennial)
NQ - --
(1,707 ' TrapperQ$�
�' • '_ .• SCP3 - (Perennial)
1 Al i{ '�,eR 40--i.�? r Z' x. ,��. S ti ,,�,
lk,. .� .. :, , _ '' , 2O18Aerial Photography
II1Figure 3.2 Delineation Map
WI LD LAN D S 0 200 400 Feet V Huntsman Mitigation Site 4
ENGINEERING I i 1 N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
Wilkes County, NC

M ! :
tiff-AIM 11111'4•"-
Project Parcels ..;
-
i Assessment Area Wetland 1J
Potential Open Waters (Ponds) _ # • 6744. 4 -.4 *-�• 4 (0.092 4��:
VjA Potential Wetland Waters "
Stream- Perennial i '+.: ;;„ -Y' ¢-•
--• Stream Perennial (Subsurface) ; •
;,,; ��ErEGIIII ` 5 i
(Perennial)
Non-Project Streams i � ., i ' '� = :x �t�.w
Existing Culverts/Piped Stream R
o Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
iLizij
o Wetland/Upland Data Point (DP#) i o Wetland Q L rr*►
(0.004
i *"" r*, rr-
D n, NM
i • - f (Perennial)
� _ i :mil& 1
. . , . ., .
.. .
, ., . .
... ? .z 4iivii..10010.0.....,
1 . :,. . . A
4/../
Wetland d
Open
Q �//4 (0.283
II
Wetland
Ifillt\` (0.565 (0.345 Oa
/
Wetland Q
S .
(0.230
• ' ":"
S.
's DP9 Z
`• IN: Wetland p Oi
4/ 123511DM
s's (Perennial)
(tea
//
(Perennial)
s, S(Perennial) IN aZ
- s
(�oi
a' --
i . �. WIRD
,, o
•
4% - - - �'- ,
i
_ - - 2018 Aerial Photogra.
11111q1 1,111W W I L D L A N D S \ Figure 3.3 Delineation Map
0 100 200 Feet V Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I N Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
Wilkes County, NC

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 9/10/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.,Ian Eckardt, 1430 S.Mint
Street,#104, Charlotte,NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME,AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Huntsman Mitigation Site, SAW-
2019-00836
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 444 Ingle Hollow Road, Ronda,NC,
28670. The Huntsman Mitigation Site is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for unavoidable stream
channel impacts for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:North Carolina County: Wilkes City: Ronda
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.140676 Longitude: -80.932077
Universal Transverse Mercator: UTM 17
Name of nearest waterbody: North Little Hunting Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 2/14/19, 5/7/20, 5/11/20, and 6/1/20
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount Geographic authority
Latitude Longitude of aquatic Type of aquatic to which the aquatic
Site Number (decimal (decimal resources in review resources(i.e., resource "may be"
area (acreage and wetland vs. non- subject(i.e.,Section
degrees) degrees) linear feet,if wetland waters) 404 or Section
applicable 10/404)
1.) North Little Hunting Non wetland
36.139411 -80.933936 1,646 LF Section 404
Creek waters
2.) UT1 36.143198 -80.933564 996 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
4.) UT2 36.136964 -80.930729 1,707 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
4.) UT3 36.138900 -80.934588 133 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
5.) Barn Branch 36.138354 -80.931253 247 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
6.)Old Bus Branch 36.138044 -80.930070 92 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
7.) Rifle Trib 36.137449 -80.929902 193 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
8.)Trapper Trib 36.137430 -80.930068 41 LF Non wetland Section 404
waters
9.)Wetland A 36.138569 -80.934872 0.737 AC Wetland waters Section 404
10.)Wetland B 36.138445 -80.936027 0.029 AC Wetland waters Section 404

Estimated amount Geographic authority
Latitude Longitude
of aquatic Type of aquatic to which the aquatic
Site Number (decimal (decimal resources in review resources(i.e., resource "may be"
area (acreage and wetland vs. non- subject(i.e.,Section
degrees) degrees) linear feet,if wetland waters) 404 or Section
applicable 10/404)
11.)Wetland C 36.139350 -80.934052 0.004 AC Wetland waters Section 404
12.)Wetland D 36.140045 -80.931711 0.007 AC Wetland waters Section 404
13.)Wetland E 36.139997 -80.929560 0.001 AC Wetland waters Section 404
14.)Wetland F 36.139288 -80.930889 0.942 AC Wetland waters Section 404
15.)Wetland G 36.139578 -80.929832 0.080 AC Wetland waters Section 404
16.)Wetland H 36.138606 -80.931109 0.092 AC Wetland waters Section 404
17.)Wetland I 36.137984 -80.931317 0.230 AC Wetland waters Section 404
18.)Wetland J 36.138182 -80.930686 0.283 AC Wetland waters Section 404
19.)Wetland K 36.138286 -80.930558 0.004 AC Wetland waters Section 404
20.)Wetland L 36.137517 -80.930130 0.345 AC Wetland waters Section 404
21.)Wetland M 36.141729 -80.933077 0.290 AC Wetland waters Section 404
22.)Wetland N 36.143277 -80.933545 0.004 AC Wetland waters Section 404
23.)Wetland 0 36.143867 -80.933805 0.089 AC Wetland waters Section 404
24.)Wetland P 36.137553 -80.933230 0.011 AC Wetland waters Section 404
25.)Wetland Q 36.140913 -80.932717 0.019 AC Wetland waters Section 404
26.)Open Water 1 36.144399 -80.933791 0.460 AC Open waters Section 404
27.)Open Water 2 36.143549 -80.933651 0.202 AC Open waters Section 404
28.)Open Water 3 36.141468 -80.932909 1.515 AC Open waters Section 404
29.)Open Water 4 36.137807 -80.933275 0.565 AC Open waters Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD(check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps,plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: GIS figures including Vicinity,USGS Topographic,Delineation,& Soils
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters'study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12-digit HUC maps.
®U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: 1:24,000 Scale Ronda quadrangle
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Web Soils Survey Website
❑National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): 2018 aerial on GIS figures with submittal.
or®Other(Name&Date): Representative site photos with submittal.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
044\- 1/28/2021
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
DATE impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.,Ian Eckardt File Number: SAW-2019-00836 Date: 2/2/2021
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
❑ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The . . lowing identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a)modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b)modify the permit to address some of your
objections,or(c)not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections,the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice,means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II- ' T FOR APP CTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However,you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
•INT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr. Phillip Shannin,Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Steve Kichefski CESAD-PDO
Asheville Regulatory Office U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Asheville,North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn: Steve Kichefski,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin,Administrative
Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPENDIX 3—DWR and NCSAM Identification Forms

SCP1 .
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/11.I/1 CI Project/Site: Hurtstwara Latitude: 36.139411
Evaluator: 2:. sc,,kr,teu-, County: Wilke s Longitude: -80.933936
Total Points: • �• (_;+ 1e .
u Stream Determination (cir - ••••- Other I,,
•
Stream is at least intermittent 13 ,-.+, Crc.ck
if t9 orperenni3lif>_30' Ephemeral IntermittentQOM e.g. Quad Nate: j
•
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ..5) ) Absent Weak Moderate I Strong
Y I I co 3O
13 Continuity of channel bed and bnk• 0 1 2
• � 2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 •
ripple-pool sequence Q
4. Particle size of stream substrate . 0 I 1 • 2 C)
5.Active/relict fioodplain- • . 0 1 ( 93
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 I 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 I 2. 3 •
8. Headcuts 1 2
3
9. Grade control • 0 0.5 0 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No =0 Y• es=,3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual .
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 .)
12. Presence of Basefloav 0 ' • 1 2 f
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter . I . 1.5 I 1 0.5 I 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 I 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 i g 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? I No =0 Yes=
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11•5 ) •
18.Fibrous roots in streambed . I 1 • 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed I 7...3 2
2 ( 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 '2 I 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 .1 2 0 I
22. Fish 0.5 I 1 1.5
23. Crayfish •
S 0.5 I 1 I 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 0) 1.5 I
• 25.Algae .. I 0 5 1 1.5
• 26.Wetland plants in streambed I FACT= 0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
' 'perennial streams l mayAN
also be identified using other methods.€See p. 35 of manual. n/ .fss �^
Notes: Otxsuoe3 lb+ C' 4 au.n1c Shay $ fa to:c�tt� i c/ S"�'oniT(.i i 1 1)1,4,1‹. *�-1‘� ip�.tvo.,
Sketch: -
.

. - SCP2
NC D VQStream Identification-Form Version 4.1.1 -
Date: a /i G+ /19 Project/Site:. 1.(.i,r.}�m0.„ Latitude: 36.143198
Evaluator:.. E_ le. ,c�+' County: W i I k4s Longitude: _$0.933564
Total Points: Stream Determination (ci a one Other UTI (opiA cif 4,Ac..!
Stream is at least intermittent33 . Ephemeral Intermittent Perennia e.g. QuadNerhe: betoa,. Peml a)if 2 s 9 or perennial if 2 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = IN . .) . . Absent I •Weak• Moderate Strong
13'Continuity of channel bed.and bank 0 1 2 I
..•
2. Sinuosity of channel'along thahveg 0 � � I 2......'-_
� 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, •
ripple-pool.sequence ° • 1 CD 3
4, Particle size"of stream substrate • 0 LV • 2 3
15.Active/relict floodplain . 0 1 •3
5. Depositional bars or benches . 0 1 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0' 2 3
•
8. Headcuts • : 1 • 2 3
9.Grade control e 0 5 1 • 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 cf.5) • •
11..Second or greater order channel ' No=0 • . Yes='3 •
. 'artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual .
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = f O.5 .') .
12. Presence of Basefo.w 0 • • 1 2 '
3 •
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria - = 0 1. I . I 3
14.Leaf litter I 5 I 1 I 0.5 , • I 0
15,Sediment on plants or debris . 0 iJD 1 I 1.5
• 16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 C 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No =0
C. Biology (Subtotal = ' g.5 )
18.Fibrous roots in streambed I ' 2 • 1 • I ' 0 .
19.Rooted upland.plants in streambed .I 3 • 2 1 0 •
120.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 I 2 • I 'i 3
• 21.Aquatic Mollusks • 0 ' .1 2
• 22.Fish I le • • 0.5 1 1.5 •
• 23.Crayfish ' 0 0.5 1
.24.Amphibians I 0• 0.5 I 1.5 _ I
•
• 25.Algae •' .. I 1.5
I 0 ' 0..5 , 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
' 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: AS$esstt rneSr ups-I~ra..-M . or..,. dr\&Alt Se•C.4ibV\ 14 VT I i'v\, b4"1WaaA PoNti a
a.n,1. p;ps sic.-1-oo.A. Prrc.. t....s a. vv.oAtr 4.c C..nn.a•e..74 q'P ..ron ox ,1;'2..:Al bw.Gs#'eSi eti ,,..LOW 4.r �/ .
e4 fop.sswt„A+ rexc-L is ' 304(‘..wkatrc.4 '4). 0. •14. 44' p:Fs.... R l'i hll> .u, `ccw 1..)i1.M,LG.5 .
Sketch: 4 'P ` •P ![
x l.• .Wl 6/lv‘s ` kYV4dhYKiL� 50s�1 'p1lL/ CQ/AMa/�.
I �/rr 1 y f 1 I Al ! ,L I I J hf.kl't' r a-4" ore �.1� m/.�n l0tie.4 'i4 I'kl d4-A4. . v,t.. I a41 e �..b 0-rfe. S'v1054i'4."e(„ .
0-n0` I-Pet' r0.C4 W..r.4s,f •l •
• •

SCP3
NC D«•QStream Identification FormVersion 4.11 -
Date: a- I L4_ 19 Project/Site:. 4vn+S M a.A Latitude: 36.136964
Evaluator: S, 5C1444,rc14.- County: 1i1j fk4.s: Longitude: _80.930729
Total Points: Stream Determination (ci - • e Other UT,. s-irr:.n,.M
Stream is at least intermittent 3 S Ephenferal Intermittent g. Quad Name:
if 13orperenniali(>_30` 2>\�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = r$.5 ' ) Absent I Weak• Moderate 1 Strong
13'Continuity of channel bed and bank' 0 I 1 2 Q
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 I 1 I. - 3 _.__.. -.
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 • 2 Q
ripple-pool_sequence _
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 ,
S.Active/relict floodpiain . 0 1 1 2
6.Depositional•bars or benches 0 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0' 1 2 ' 3 .
8. Headcuts 0 1 3
9.Grade control 0 0.5 '
1.5
10.Natural valley • 0 0.5 I �1 Cr:/ • - •
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 I . Yes=3
I. 'artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2 .)
12.Presence of Baseflow I 0 1 2 �3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria - IIW 0 1 I 2 3
14.Leaf litter I .•1.5 1 I 0,5 , I 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris , 0 ' 1 i 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5 I
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? I No=0 - i Yes=3 -
C. Biolo Subtotal = b',5 ) ,
18.Fibrous roots in streambed ' ' 3 I ' 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 - 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) t . 2 ,3
•
21.Aquatic Mollusks ' .1. I 2 3
22.Fish ' 0.5' 1 1.5
23,Crayfish I 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0' 0.5 ID 1.5
25.Algae . .. . 0 I •.5 1 -----•. I 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0>
' 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: OJ4 ,ruri! a. y,tfli A fdMv✓- 1 p�Cs�4.aro1 %��row A. a .S'a.1w n trss
Sketch: ' •
i

SCP4
NC D«VQStream Identification FormVersion 4.11 _
Date: oZ _ [Li _ 101 Project/Site: 14VI,4.46,L660,1 Latitude: 36.138044
Evaluator: _, Ee. eatd+ County: W t I1j4.4s Longitude: _
80.930070
Total Points: Stream Determination(ci - .,- Other + v r�
Stream is at least inte.rmittent 33 L 5 Epherrferal Intermittentaffilp Q�la a s 47 rarLt3
if. t3 or perennial if_>30. p e g.•QuadNama:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 ` ) .Absent Weak Moderate I Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank. 0 I 1 2
2, Sinuosity of channel along thahveg I 0 I 1 2 3
3. In-channel•structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, •
.ripple-pool sequence I 0 I 1 O 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 " r2 3
15.Active/relict foodplain 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars orbenches I 1 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits I 0 1 2 3 •
8. Headcuts I 0 1 .2 .
9.Grade control • 0 C 1 I 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 I 1
11.Second or greater order channel I • No=0 1 Yes=3
I. 'artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = di,5 .) .
12.Presence of Baseflo.w 0 1 2
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 I 2 I 3
14.Leaf litter I° 0's 1 0.5 I 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris . 0 GO I 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 E Qat 1 L 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? I No =0 es=)
C. Biolo Subtotal = )
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 I 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) I 0 CD-- . 2 3 '
21.Aquatic Mollusks .1 2
3
22.Fish 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish i 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 6 1 1.5
25.Algae. •, I . 0 0.,5 I 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed . FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
' 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
[Notes: obsorvel I cAllis'Ply ra..A1 1 st4.14"0..Ad‘r, `r ,t. ,....„1, i s .�►w i..,c1/41, ,c,isr.J bd0,,o,, _
fs , I 0 - 1 D ' k&A 44 44.-4. Y G./i .J lt'L A-4 1 A 6.11 16", MIL.1 a et-4, c .4,44"` el t"R" ""i 4•✓ /4-.
Sketch: ' •

•
NC D«Q.Stream Identification-Form Version 4.11 SCP6
Date: a .1 t.4_l i Project/Site: {}u,,-1-.1 rA0-" Latitude: 36.138354
Evaluator: ,.r. tra.kcwro\+ County: \n/;ilct.s Longitude: -80.931253 •
Total Points: Stream Determination(circ - ..- Other f3 % (ar.„n�
Stream is at least intermittent 3 \ . 5 Epherrferal Intermittent 4 i e.g. Quad Paine: �°
-
d>_ 19 or perennial if 2 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I a. • ) Absent I Weak' Moderate 1 Strong
11''Continuity of channel,bed and bank 0 I 1 2 '
� 3
I2.Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg 10 2.---•--------.. ..........._::
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence . I 0 .. 1 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate . 0 i 'l 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain . 0 1 . ! .3 . -
6.Depositional bars or benches t 0 1 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0' 4.:J 2 3
8. Headcuts • .( ) 1 2 3 -
9.Grade control 0 C.5) 1 j 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 (1.0 •
11.Second or greater order channel Co=0 I . Yes='3
I. 'artificial ditches are not rated'; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9,5 .•)
12.Presence of Baseflow I 0 ' 1 2
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria - = 0 I Cl.) 2
14.Leaf litter • .0 I 3
1 � 0.5 � 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris . 0 CID 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles ( 0 ers 1 1.5 I
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 • Q'e=j%)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10 ) •
18.Fibrous roots in streambed S
2 1. p
19.Rooted upland.plants in streambed 2 I 1 I 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 2 4 3 {
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 S
2 3
22.Fish ' C ' 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish 0 - C 1 1.5
24.Amphibians . 0' 0.5
25.Algae . .. 0 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed f , • FAD/ =0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=
' 'perennial streamsL may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 off manual. s '
Notes: ®,a Sher je. w I ay va.+i`' Wer".1 \ r 1r.'4' \Pke.A+d• 5Aa:k i C:f�1 c ® 3 F
l yy " t SP+w�6a�eruq .p�StJrr
C1 ',31 �f ` I E ! , i ,.
hc...04.1 0I 4 R"•+ef a�,T A. .$f.X./> DI&"a& ...at,
Sketch: ' j �/Y ' •

•
i\CD«Q Stream Identification ForthVersion 4.11 SCP7
Date: a_-1 LI_)9 Prolect/Site: µv,+Sm an Latitude: 36.137430
Evaluator: 1. Ec.1<uer01 County: W;((kQ 5 Longitude: _80.930068
Total Points: Stream Determination(ci - Other `hrw ar Try
Stream fs at least intermittent ,5 PP b
d>_ 19 oroerenni3l intermittent
30' Ephemeral Intermitte i e.g.Quad Nettie:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �'1 . ) . Absent I Weak Moderate Strong
1''Continuity of channel bed and bank' 0 I 1 2 3
12. Sinuosity of channel along thahveg p I 0
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool/sequence 0 . 1 Q 3
4. Particle size"of stream substrate . 0 CD 2 3
15.Active/relict floodolain • . 0 1 (2) • 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 1 2 I • 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits S 1 ( 2 _ I 3
8, Headcuts I 0 1 .2 -
9.Grade control 0 ..5 I 1 I 1.5
10.Natural valley 0
11.Second orgreater order channel T" 0.5 1
I 1 5
N
o=0 Yes='3
'artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual . -- I
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = /0,5 .)
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria - 0 1 V I 3
14.Leaf litter 1 i 0.5 , i 0
15,Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 I -
1,5
0,
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal =_ $ ) •
18.Fibrous roots in streambed . I ( 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed •I 0 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) t ., 'f„I 0 (1 I . 2 I 13
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 ( 2 3
22.Fish . 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish I 0 0.5 I 1 1.5 i
24.Amphibians 1. salr,.,Ha..Ler 0 1
1.5
25.Algae . 1 0 0, I 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=Cr)
' 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: (Z.P .c,)t or:q:w„�. e0 a_ '�iS �s\' ' 0. tokat,a ' A Jai ra,�ew s 114. a -'wt w+ ,SSG p.
Sketch: ' ! I . .

•
NC D«'Q.Stream Identification FormVersion 4.11
SCP8 '
Date: a_ I Li.., Project/Site: 4 v A4,5 6,A A.A Latitude: 36.137449
Evaluator: ._, t c-NGn,rcl+ I County: �i UI�.cy. Longitude: _$0.929902
r
Total Points: Stream Determination (ci Other Rt4)a. 1'rt6
Scream is at least intermittent 3 2,'� 5 Ephenferal Intermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
ifs 19 or perennial if>_30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = IG ' ) Absent I Weak• Moderate Strong
13'Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 0
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 ' 1 I . 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool_sequence '. 0 (2) 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 0 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain . 0 to 2 • 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 b 2 • 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits I 0' l 2 3 •
8. Headcuts 0 1 .2 3 -
9.Grade control 0 (:.''l 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1:5 All '
11.Second or greater order channel • No=0 . Yes=3
'artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = q .)
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 ' ' 1 2
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria - 0 'i 2 I 3
14.Leaf litter I° - ( 1 0.5 , i. 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris . 0 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0.5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 ' I Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = -4-.+-5 )
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed I 2 1 0 - ' '
20.Nlacrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) I 0 1 I . 2 3 •
21.Aquatic Mollusks . G I 1. I 2 3
22.Fish 0 ' 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish I ' ,0 _
I 0.5 1
1.5
24.Amphibians Sa �r‘we,dtr 0 1 I 1.5
25.Algae .. I . 0 '_ 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed 15`jyas 7 FACW=0.75)OBL= 1.5 Other=0 -
I' 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. of manual.
Notes: C-kk,A, -k 4ri w'ke1' o,4' a,.. I.w v+.�' -.Fk,� p -•'�'
Yai0li$tlt, c..r. ,/0c,'I"i-++?.+l. ..T.,i Z' Cf n.s.+ t e'w .......4 ,,,1 •a„ rr i^ ` ti "..A. t s 64CF n4 o hw, !e
Sketch: ' -
f

SCP9
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Dale: ;2/10/aa Project/Site: µKtn'Esrekr.A Latitude: 3( 13$900
Evaluator Y, e:c1 r J.E County: W;l l t r.s Longitude: - g0,9 34588
I 1!-
Total Points: 4 L(,z!7
Stream rs at least orte►nrttent �� Stream Determination(ci e Other Ur 3
_LIA 4
if 19 orperermeat if>3(t, Ephemeral Intennitten Perennial e-g. Quad Name:j,,.,,.,sf up,,, a.‘1 P
w - ..,..1 a.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
, la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg _ 0 CO2 3
3 In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 O 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 _ 3
5.Activehelict floodplain 0 1 ( 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 083 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. I-feadcuts 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0
R
1 1.5
0
10.Natural valley _ 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel �o= Yes=3
artific+al ditches are not rated:see discussions in manual
B_ Hydrology (Subtotal= )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 C.19
�
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 3 _
14. Leaf litter t;1. 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 W. 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 es=3
C. Biolo± Subtotal=
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 1 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed �2 1 0
l
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 .. 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22.Fish it 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians �0 () 1 1.5
25 Algae _ CD 0.5 1 1.5
28.Wetland plants in slreambed L FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 "B,,,,c
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes' • . rsIrry one crc.......tr'I. e... E acc _ . ......1r.6.y... ,
Sketch:

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-NLHC(above Bridge) 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13998,-80.93236
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
NLHC(above
9. Site number(show on attached map): Bridge) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -600'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 3-4 Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 15' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A� ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) ®Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ZYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ®Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ®Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
®B ®B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ®D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ❑D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman NLHC(above Bridge) Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Ma3 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-NLHC(Below Bridge) 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.14005,-80.92934
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
NLHC Below
9. Site number(show on attached map): Bridge 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -850'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2-4' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 15-20' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A� ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) ®Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ZYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ®Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ®Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ®Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
®B ®B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman NLHC(Below Bridge) Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Ma3 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-UT1 Reach 1 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: I. Eckardt/WEI
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Fork Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): UT1 R1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): - 100'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 0.5-1' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 3-5' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? EYes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ® Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? EYes ❑No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
< 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®B ®B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment reach is downstream of pond 2 before it becomes a piped stream.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman - UT1 Reach 1 Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/WEI
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(4)Channel Stability HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat MEDIUM
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-UT1 Reach 2(above Rd) 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.14068,-80.93269
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
UT1 Reach 2
9. Site number(show on attached map): (above Rd) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): - 175'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2-7' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 10-15' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� J ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. EYes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ®Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ®D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ®B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
®B ❑B ®B ❑B ®B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment reach is downstream of pond 3 and above Ingle Hollow Road.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman UT1 Reach 2 Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
(above Rd)
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-UT1 Reach 2 below Rd 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.14000,-80.93233
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
UT1 Reach
9. Site number(show on attached map): 2(Below Rd) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -200'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 3-4' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 4-8' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A� ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ZYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ ®Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
®B ®B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
®C ®C ®C ®C ®C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment reach is downstream of Ingle Hollow Road.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman UT1 Reach 2 Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
below Rd
Stream Category Mal Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-UT2 Reach 1 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13729,-80.93073
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): UT2 Reach 1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -300'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2-3' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 8-12' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. EYes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ®Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ®Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ®C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman - UT2 Reach 1 Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport HIGH
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-UT2 Reach 2 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13770,-80.93015
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): UT2 Reach 2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -250'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 1-2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 3-6' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? EYes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? EYes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ZYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ®Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment reach begins at existing culvert and ends at the confluence with Rifle Trib.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman - UT2 Reach 2 Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
Huntsman-UT2 Reach 3 Upper&
1. Project name(if any): Reach 4 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13992,-80.93145
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
UT2 Reach 3
9. Site number(show on attached map): Upper&Reach 4 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -650'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2-4' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 4-7' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ®Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ZYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ®Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment reach begins along Reach 3 where the existing wooded buffer ends and continues until the confluence with
North Little Hunting Creek.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman UT2 Reach 3 Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Upper& Reach 4
Stream Category Mal Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-UT2 R2 Lower 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13841,-80.93071
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): UT2R2 Lower 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -350'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 3-5' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 8-12' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? EYes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? EYes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. EYes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
• ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ®Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ®D ®D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment reach begins at the confluence with Rifle trib and continues about 200 LF downstream of Old Bus Branch until
the existing tree buffer ends.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman - UT2 R2 Lower Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-Barn Branch 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13881,-80.93116
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Barn Branch 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -230'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2-4' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5-8' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ZYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ ®Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman - Barn Branch Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-Old Bus Branch 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13802,-80.93024
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Old Bus Branch 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): - 100'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 5-10' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 10' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman -Old Bus Branch Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-Rifle Trib 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13766,-80.93014
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Rifle Trib 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): - 150'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 1-3' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 2-5' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. EYes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ®Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman - Rifle Trib Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Huntsman-Trapper Trib 2. Date of evaluation: 5/11/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands 4.Assessor name/organization: M. Caddell
5. County: Wilkes 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: North Little Hunting Creek
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.13750,-80.93007
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Trapper Trib 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): -75'
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 1-2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 2-4' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ®III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening(such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
< 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
®F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
®A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant(A) = > 40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. EYes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ®Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ®D ®D ®D ®D ®D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Huntsman -Trapper Trib Date of Assessment 5/11/2020
Stream Category Mb1 Assessor Name/Organization M. Caddell
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(4)Channel Stability HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport HIGH
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat MEDIUM
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(3) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

APPENDIX 4—Supplementary Design Information

Existing Conditions Geomorphic Parameters
North Little Hunting UT1 UT2 R2 UT2 R3 Old Bus Branch Barn Branch
Parameter Notation Units Creek
min max min max min max min max min max min max
stream type G4 E4(straight/incised)/C4 A6 E5b G5 B5a
drainage area DA sq mi 1.99 0.10 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.02
bankfull cross-
sectional area Abu SF 20.6 25.8 9.8 8.2 2.6 3.2 3.4 3.3
avg velocity during
bankfull event wbkf fps 5.0 5.1 5.8 5.9 9.2 5.8 4.8 6.4
width at bankfull wbkf feet 12.4 16.3 13.7 10.2 3.5 3.0 4.1 3.8
maximum depth at dmax feet 2.1 2.3 1.3 1.7 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.2
bankfull
mean depth at
bankfull dbkf feet 1.6 1.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.8 0.9
bankfull width to
depth ratio wbkf/dbkf 7.5 10.3 12.7 19.1 4.7 2.9 4.9 4.3
low bank height feet 4.2 5.3 1.3 3.1 2.8 3.3 7.5 3.1
bank height ratio BHR 2.0 2.3 1.0 1.8 2.8 2.3 6.3 2.5
floodprone area wfpa feet 17 44 35 23 5 10 7 9
width
entrenchment ratio ER 1.4 2.7 2.2 2.5 1.3 3.2 1.7 2.5
max pool depth at
bankfull dpool feet 2.4 1.9 1.093 2.5 1.5 1.3
pool depth ratio dpool/dbkf 1.5 1.5 2.4 2.7 1.5 2.4 1.8 1.5
pool width at w feet 14.0 6.7 3.5 5.0 4.9 9.1
bankfull p°°
pool width ratio Wpool/wbkf 0.9 1.1 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.6 1.2 2.4
Bkf pool cross-
sectional area Ap°°l SF 20.2 10.7 2.3 7.5 4.9 7.1
pool area ratio Apool/Abkf 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 0.9 2.3 1.4 2.2
pool-pool spacing p-p feet 56 228 5 36 3 19 15 50 4 19 3 24
pool-pool spacing
ratio P-P/Wbkf 4.5 14.0 0.4 3.5 0.9 5.4 5.1 16.4 1.0 4.6 0.7 6.4
valley slope Svalley feet/foot 0.0058 0.0089 0.0246 0.0917 0.0353 0.1070 0.0590
channel slope Schannel feet/foot 0.0073 0.0296 0.0791 0.0254 0.0284 0.0435
sinuosity K 1.07 1.06 1.08 1.11 1.10 1.04
belt width wink feet 25 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
meander width ratio wblt/wbkf 1.5 2.0 0.6 0.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
meander length Lm feet 70 40 N/A N/A N/A N/A
meander length Lm/wbkf 4.3 5.6 2.9 3.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
ratio
linear wavelength LW 55 26 N/A N/A N/A N/A
linear wavelength LW/wbkf 3.4 4.4 1.9 2.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
ratio
radius of curvature Ro feet 54 25 N/A N/A N/A N/A
radius of curvature Flo/wbkf 3.3 4.4 1.8 2.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
ratio
d50 reachwide mm 15 27 Silt/Clay 0.9 0.1 0.1
d50 riffle mm 22 54 35 7 12 10 0.3
N/A-Channelized stream channel with limited pattern and bed form profile variability.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 4

Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters
UT to Catawba River UT to Catawba River UT to South Fork Fishing Shew Ridge Henry Fork UT1 Agony Acres UT1 Reach
Box Creek Foust Upstream Ironwood Tributary UT to Gap Branch Timber Trib Mid-Reach UT to Kelly Branch
Notation Units Reach 1 Reach 2 Creek TributaryA Upstream 3
min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max
stream type C4 E5 C4 E3b/C3b B5a A5a+ Sightly Entrenched B4a B4 B5a B4/B4a B4/B4a B4
or A4
drainage area DA sq mi 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.6 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.15
design discharge Q cfs 95 80 95.2 80 8.00 13 18.7 17 3.50 23 8.2 37
bankfull cross-sectional Abler SF 28.9 11.4 17.5 23.9 24.1 13.2 1.8 2.7 3.8 4.6 27.6 11.1 5.74 1.9 3.6 7.4
area
average velocity during
bankfull event
vhkf fps 3.0 5.54 4 6.06 4.1 4.9 5.0 3.7 3.3 5.9 5.4 4.9
Cross-Section
width at bankfull wbkf feet 23.5 9.7 12.4 18.5 19.4 12.3 4.1 5 6.2 8.9 3.6 7.91 3.2 11.1
maximum depth at bankfull dmax feet 1.92 1.7 1.8 2.1 1.73 0.7 0.8 1 0.7 0.5 1.13 0.7 0.8 1
mean depth at bankfull dbkf feet 1.23 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.07 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.73 0.5 0.7
bankfull width to depth w d 19.1 8.1 8.9 14.3 15.7 11.5 9.3 9.1 10.1 17 12.1 10.9 5.2 16.4 16.6
ratio hk/ hk
depth ratio dmax/dbkf feet 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.62 1.8 0.2 1.7 1.4 1.67 1.3 1.3 1.5 1
bank height ratio BHR 1.5 0.9 1.4 --- --- 0.77 1.26 1 1.3 1 1 1 2.47 1 1.3 1
floodprone area width wfpa feet 76.3 52 79 55 101.2 53 7 10.3 20.9 13.6 7.5 9.1 6.3 13.3 25
entrenchment ratio ER 3.3 5.36 6.37 2.9 5.3 4.31 1.7 2.1 3.4 1.5 2.1 1.15 2 1.7 2.3
Slope
valley slope Svalley feet/foot 0.023 0.011 --- 0.029 0.1025 0.1135 --- 0.0406 0.0647 0.049 0.044 0.05
channel slope Schnl feet/foot 0.008 0.005 0.009 0.027 0.0815 0.1139 0.068 0.0334 0.0634 0.03 0.065 0.04 0.049
Profile
riffle slope Srlffle feet/foot 0.010 0.08 0.01 0.06 --- --- 0.01 0.35 0.024 0.2 0.034 0.28 0.01 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.03 0.11 N/A 0.05 0.07
riffle slope ratio Sr;ffle/Schnl 1.2 9.5 2.5 13.3 0.5 12.8 0.29 2.45 0.30 2.46 0.16 2.06 0.69 4.49 0.47 1.74 N/A 1.3 1.8
pool slope Sp feet/foot 0.0000 0.0008 0.001 0.003 --- --- 0.002 0.022 0 0.17 0 0.21 0.00 0.06 0 0.082 0.03 0.06 N/A 0 0.016
pool slope ratio SP/Schnl 0.00 0.10 0.3 0.7 --- --- 0.1 0.8 0 2.09 0 1.84 0.06 0.90 0 2.46 0.44 0.93 N/A 0 0.4
pool-to-pool spacing Lpp feet 28.8 88.5 31 60 --- --- 19.3 46.4 6.3 32 3.1 30.6 18.4 26.8 6 49.4 20.9 45.1 N/A 14.1 24.9
pool spacing ratio LPP/wbkf 1.2 3.8 2.8 5.4 --- --- 1.6 3.8 1.5 7.8 0.6 6.1 2.99 4.35 0.7 5.6 5.81 12.53 N/A 2.6 4.6
pool cross-sectional area Apooi SF 49.9 18.1 29.2 34.9 N/A1 --- --- 7.10 --- --- N/A --- 9.8
pool area ratio Apool/Abkf 1.73 1 1.6 1.2 1.5 N/A1 --- --- 1.89 --- --- N/A --- 1.3
maximum pool depth dpool feet 4.39 2.5 2.5 2.9 N/A1 --- --- 1.55 --- --- N/A 1.5 1.6
pool depth ratio dpool/dbkf 3.6 1.8 2.1 1.9 2.3 N/A1 --- --- 2.54 --- --- N/A 2.6 2.3
pool width at bankfull wpool feet 18.8 10.4 15.3 20.5 N/A1 --- --- 6.10 --- --- N/A --- 8.5
pool width ratio wpool/wbkf 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.8 1.1 N/A1 --- --- 0.99 --- --- N/A --- 0.8
Pattern
sinuosity K 1.33 1.1 --- 1.1 1.3 1.19 --- 1.12 1.1 1 1.1 1.04
belt width wblt feet 62.0 87.8 55 --- --- 23 18.0 34.0
meander width ratio wblt/wbkf 2.6 3.7 4.4 5.7 --- --- 1.8
linear wavelength Lm feet 38.8 76.2 65 107 --- --- 52 79 27.0 94.0
(formerly meander length)
linear wavelength ratio
(formerly meander length Ljwbkf 1.70 3.20 6.7 8.6 --- --- 4.2 6.4
ratio)
meander length feet 23.00 38.1
meander length ratio 1.0 1.6
radius of curvature Rc feet 31 56 --- --- 29 52 8.0 26.0
radius of curvature ratio Rd wbkf 2.8 5.1 --- --- 2.4 4.2
Particle Size Distribution from Reach-wide Pebble Count
d5o Description Very Coarse Sand Small Cobble Small Cobble --- Coarse Sand --- Very Fine Gravel Coarse Gravel
d16 mm 0.3 9.6 0.5 0.09 0.26 0.97 0.49 0.14 0.4 2
d35 mm 0.4 37 29.8 0.44 0.5 8 3.5 0.57 8.0 12.9
d50 mm 1.8 61 75.9 3.60 0.91 19.02 6.5 2 19.0 50.6
d84 mm 12.8 130 170.8 22.6 19 102.3 48 42 102.3 168.1
d95 mm 25.2 1100 332 2896.3 97 256 83 94 256.0 2048
dloo mm 90 --- 2048 >2048 128 >2048 128 256.0 >2048 >2048
N/A'-Pool cross section not surveyed for this reach.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 4

Proposed Geomorphic Parameters
North Little Hunting Creek UT1 UT2
Barn Branch Old Bus Branch
Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 1(low slope) Reach 1(high slope) Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4
Notation Units Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
stream type C4 C4 C4 B4a C4b C4b B5a B5 C5 B5a A5
drainage area DA sq mi 1.79 1.99 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.01
design discharge Q cfs 100 110 7 10 11 7 9 9 6 4
bankfull cross-
sectional area Abu SF 29.2 31.1 2.3 1.5 2.6 3.0 1.6 2.6 4.5 1.4 0.9
average velocity
vbkf fps 3.1 3.6 2.8 4.3 4.0 3.4 5.0 3.4 2.0 3.9 4.7
during bankfull event
Cross-Section
width at bankfull wbkf feet 22.0 23.0 5.7 4.5 6.2 6.6 5.0 6.6 8.4 4.3 3.0
maximum depth at dma. feet 2.0 2.0 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.5
bankfull
mean depth at dbkf feet 1.3 1.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3
bankfull
bankfull width to w d 16.6 17.0 13.9 13.5 14.6 14.3 15.4 17.1 15.8 13.2 10.3
depth ratio bk/ bk
max depth ratio do,ax/dbkf feet 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.7
bank height ratio BHR 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1
floodprone area wfpa feet 48 220 51 230 13 57 10 45 11 25 12 26 7 12 9 16 18 84 6 10 4 7
width
entrenchment ratio ER 2.2 10.0 2.2 10.0 2.2 10.0 2.2 10.0 1.8 4.0 1.8 4.0 1.4 2.4 1.4 2.4 2.2 10.0 1.4 2.4 1.4 2.4
Slope
valley slope S,aiiey feet/foot 0.0057 0.0057 0.0182 0.0621 0.0332 0.0246 0.0917 0.0353 0.0121 0.0590 0.1070
channel slope Sehoi feet/foot 0.0049 0.0066 0.0190 0.0594 0.0380 0.0241 0.0830 0.0300 0.0070 0.0520 0.0900
Profile
riffle slope S,;ff1e feet/foot 0.0063 0.0170 0.0086 0.0230 0.0247 0.0665 0.0772 0.2079 0.0494 0.3800 0.0313 0.2410 0.1079 0.8300 0.0390 0.3000 0.0091 0.0245 0.0260 0.1560 0.0450 0.2700
riffle slope ratio Sr;ffie/Sehol 1.3 3.5 1.3 3.5 1.3 3.5 1.3 3.5 1.3 10.0 1.3 10.0 1.3 10.0 1.3 10.0 1.3 3.5 0.5 3.0 0.5 3.0
pool slope Sp feet/foot 0.0000 0.0039 0.0000 0.0053 0.0304 0.0456 0.0950 0.1426 0.1824 0.2128 0.0000 0.0193 0.0000 0.0664 0.0000 0.0240 0.0000 0.0056 0.0000 0.0416 0.0000 0.0720
pool slope ratio Sp/Setoff 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.6 2.4 1.6 2.4 4.8 5.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8
pool-to-pool spacing Lp_p feet 66 110 69 115 17 29 14 23 12 31 13 33 3 33 3 43 25 42 2 28 2 20
pool spacing ratio Lpp/wbkf 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 0.5 6.5 0.5 6.5 3.0 5.0 0.5 6.5 0.5 6.5
pool cross-sectional Apooi SF 6.9 4.6 7.4 8.6 5.5 9.0 11.7 3.6 2.0
area
pool area ratio Apool/Abkf #VALUE! #VALUE! 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.8 3.4 3.5 2.6 2.6 2.3
maximum pool depth dpooi feet 2.7 5.3 2.7 5.4 0.8 1.6 0.7 1.3 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.8 0.7 1.3 0.8 1.5 1.1 2.1 0.7 1.3 0.6 1.2
pool depth ratio dpooi/dbkf 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
pool width at bankfull wpooi feet 32.0 32.0 8.2 6.5 8.7 9.5 7.5 9.6 11.0 6.0 4.0
pool width ratio wpool/wbkf 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.3
Pattern
sinuosity K 1.29 1.21 1.28 1.07 1.23 1.12 1.07 1.11 1.30 1.09 1.03
belt width whit feet 77 125 81 131 20 32 N/A 11 35 12 38 N/A N/A 29 48 N/A N/A
meander width ratio wbIt/wbkf 3.5 5.7 3.5 5.7 3.5 5.7 N/A 1.8 5.7 1.8 5.7 N/A N/A 3.5 5.7 N/A N/A
linear wavelength
(formerly meander LW feet 37 189 39 198 10 49 N/A 11 53 11 57 N/A N/A 14 72 N/A N/A
length)
linear wavelength
ratio(formerly LW/wbkf 1.7 8.6 1.7 8.6 1.7 8.6 N/A 1.7 8.6 1.7 8.6 N/A N/A 1.7 8.6 N/A N/A
meander length ratio)
meander length Lo, feet 110 264 115 276 29 68 N/A 31 74 33 79 N/A N/A 42 101 N/A N/A
meander length ratio Lo,/Wbkf 5 12 5 12 5 12 N/A 5 12 5 12 N/A N/A 5 12 N/A N/A
radius of curvature Re feet 40 77 41 81 10 20 N/A 11 22 12 23 N/A N/A 15 29 N/A N/A
radius of curvature Re/wbkf 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 N/A 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 N/A N/A 1.8 3.5 N/A N/A
ratio
N/A-Does not apply to B,Ba,A type channels
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 4

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 1-North Little Hunting Creek
+Riffle
1126
1124
1122
1120 0-0
c
1118
v
w 1116
1114
1112
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions
25.8 x-section area(ft.sq.)
16.3 width(ft)
1.6 mean depth(ft)
2.3 max depth(ft)
17.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.5 hydraulic radius(ft) 111
10.3 width-depth ratio
44.3 W flood prone area(ft)
2.7 entrenchment ratio
2.3 low bank height ratio
View Upstream View Downstream
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 2-North Little Hunting Creek
5+26 Pool
1120
1118
1116
1114
c
0
\\•414*****Ni
,t 1112
1110
1108
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
20.2 x-section area(ft.sq.) ,.: y� x Lr.
14.0 width(ft) '•1; . , .". _ - •-fE • . ".-
1.4 mean depth(ft) 4 -, .,3*
2.4 max depth(ft)
15.3 wetted perimeter(ft) '" -4
1.3 hydraulic radius(ft) s �`
9.7 width-depth ratio f '• _ : s,•
r ',•y'J .•-o.; . ,:i •ti- =yam
�.
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering ,R.,,,:-.4�',
r
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 3-North Little Hunting Creek
6+98 Riffle
1120
1118
•
• 0— •
1116
1114
,t 1112
1110
1108 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) —Bankfull —Floodprone Area ••• Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions -mmor
20.6 x-section area(ft.sq.)
12.4 width(ft) -
1.7 mean depth(ft)
2.1 max depth(ft) ImilvFogr
- - —
14.7 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.4 hydraulic radius(ft) •
'`
7.5 width-depth ratio .
17.0 W flood prone area(ft) .
1.4 entrenchment ratio • a3 va sozo
2.0 low bank height ratio
View Upstream View Downstream
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 4-UT1
+Riffle
1049
1047
I
1045
1043
1041
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions "
•
9.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) + I.
13.7 width(ft) - _ ,..
0.7 mean depth(ft)
1.3 max depth(ft) •
14.0 wetted perimeter(ft) V• ' . ,yy„� 'SO 1 •- ".
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) ti xH. _, ffi :. ' � k " Right Bank
Left Bank
19.1 width-depth ratio
34.5 W flood prone area(ft)
2.5 entrenchment ratio -
1.0 low bank height ratio - -
r •
Survey Date: 12/2019 v '�
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 5-UT1
+84 Pool
1012
1010
'••••• ♦
1008
1006
1004
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
10.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.7 width(ft) •
1.6 mean depth(ft)
1.9 max depth(ft)
7.4 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
Left Bank Right Bank
4.2 width-depth ratio
•
•
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 6-UT1
+92 Riffle
1012
1010
1008 •
0
v
w 1006
1004
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions
•
8.2 x-section area ft.s "'" 'La<= '`r '''
.a
•
10.2 width(ft) :y� : ktw:w rk
•
kz
0.8 mean depth(ft) �. 3
1.7 max depth(ft)
11.3 wetted perimeter(ft) 3 ;_ , _ -..
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
Left Bank Right Bank
12.7 width-depth ratio - A'i .
22.7 W flood prone area(ft) °- ti.
2.2 entrenchment ratio ?
1.8 low bank height ratio `
Survey Date: 12/2019
•
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 7-UT2 R2
+20 Pool
1040
1038
1036
1034
' 1028
1032
1026
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
2.3 x-section area(ft.sq.)
3.5 width(ft)
0.6 mean depth(ft) •
',' !
1.1 max depth(ft) •. ,
4.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft)
Left Bank Right Bank
5.4 width-depth ratio •
•
•
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 8-UT2 R2
+37 Riffle
1040
1038
1036
1034
1032
w 1030
1028
1026 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area --Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions
2.6 x-section area(ft.sq.) ° =
3.5 width(ft) = -. •,
0.8 mean depth(ft) f};;:.:"
1.0 max depth(ft) • .'
•
4.5 wetted perimeter(ft) .
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) CN` -
4.7 width-depth ratio Left Bank • Right Bank
'.
4.6 W flood prone area(ft)
1.3 entrenchment ratio - a"
2.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 9-UT2 R3
+47 Pool
1130
1128
1126 •
r
c .
0
.� 1124
v
L.
1122
1120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width(ft)
t MY0(12/2019) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x-section area(ft.sq.)
5.0 width(ft) , ' .' r.,. _'
1.5 mean depth(ft) W.V., -'x„ !` .
2.5 max depth(ft) •
7.3 wetted perimeter(ft) r.
1.0 hydraulic radius(ft)
Left Bank •i.• 84 3r.•' i• View Towards
3.3 width-depth ratio •:;,., '•"' ' ' ,`". - `�
4s7 :4: s'ti- .jam. Left bank
- . z•AtfOlb
YTS - -
Survey Date: 12/2019 •., ,
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering 4 f}Y ► : - :K "
q.:
View Upstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 10-UT2 R3
+93 Riffle
1130
1128 —
1126
.' 1124 ' \ rp * • —� —�
v
1122
1120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) —Bankfull —Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions
3.2 x-section area(ft.sq.)
3.0 width(ft) '` I -
1.1 mean depth(ft)
1.4 max depth(ft) ,
4.7 wetted perimeter(ft) s
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
2.9 width-depth ratio ..
9.6 W flood prone area(ft) - _
3.2 entrenchment ratio 1
2.3 low bank height ratio �`"
View Upstream View Downstream
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 11-Old Bus Branch
1+04 Pool
1036
•
1034 1►-
1032
1030
1028
0 1026
v 1024
1022
1020
1018
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
4.9 x-section area(ft.sq.)
4.9 width(ft)
1.0 mean depth(ft)
1.5 max depth(ft) •
6.3 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.8 hydraulic radius(ft) •
Left Bank Right Bank
4.9 width-depth ratio
•
•
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 12-Old Bus Branch
1+64 Riffle
1028
1026
1024
c
0
.1 1022
,
1020
1018
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area •••Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions :�.• •
3.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) _
4.1 width(ft) _
0.8 mean depth(ft) "'rk$ -'' •
1.2 max depth(ft)
5.1 wetted perimeter(ft) 1 -
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) a ,.,-
4.9 width-depth ratio Left Bank Y L_. • + Right Bank
6.8 W flood prone area(ft)
,. -
1.7 entrenchment ratio ,_
-
6.3 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 12/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering sf;.4 t c-• ���,,�
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 13-Barn Branch
+33 Riffle
1016
1014
1012
ZE .---Thve—*... .,.,.4____,____o___.4_..---..4n-r: 4" 0"--.....
1010
c
0
,t 1008
Lu
1006
1004 , ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) -Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
Bankfull Dimensions ¢�p'�' —'t
3.3 x-section area(ft.sq.) `d• a�.,.•�' -�•
3.8 width(ft) r:t -vy r.
0.9 mean depth(ft) 1 i p''r..
1.2 max depth(ft) :- x y
4.4 wetted perimeter(ft) '; '..`r m r
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) :..;$t ^
Left Bank A •A- ,_,'WV.: „ Right Bank
4.3 width-depth ratio ?'' '•; L• ate`_
9.4 W flood prone area(ft) mac=
2.5 entrenchment ratio ai :n, .-4 ,
2.5 low bank height ratio '} r..
`Survey Date: 12/2019 r l ; .
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
g g .ez-'
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No.100123
Existing Conditions-2019
Cross-Section 14-Barn Branch
+90 Pool
1016
1014
1012
1010
1008
•
1006
1004
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width(ft)
+MYO(12/2019) —Bankfull
•
Bankfull Dimensions
7.1 x-section area(ft.sq.) '.
9.1 width(ft) x.�
0.8 mean depth(ft)
1.3 max depth(ft)
9.8 wetted perimeter(ft) •
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) - •
Left Bank "" `` ' `r' . .�,.. r }r •( Right Bank
11.8 width-depth ratio • `s- •
•
1Y FF Rr X
•
Survey Date: 12/2019 {
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

O
O
r
O
L
/d�/\
W
L 0
1 'a 0
ry
I
MO
III
m
i-i U k 0 co
VD ct
fri
cu
m
co
Z ct
u� i
- 0
CA !, $
Z
a) 13 it
Cl..) tv
Cl) `m
cd
WI—
It ci
Cr)
N
V
o
0 0 0 0 © © 0 0 0 0
0
r.
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
O
r
O
L
m
0
1,1 L o
d o
I
co I
j
y
CO
as
2 S. N ill
cn o cn
i - C9 di U .
V
v iii ac IZ :•
E
m
" * - co
a)
a)
.� • I
� E
0
r cz
P-1 NI
TY— i
A
— cC
U
N
r o
0
o 0, Go .0 re-, -4 m N
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
A o
r
Y
U
O
L
• d
CO
I A
1 o
d o
I CO
•
1
• • A
■, CD as
E
```I .0 m
._l 0 o CO
.,I ) C.) •, " 'E'
a)
A `�` - >
as
co
-� `�` E
CI ';
1
cn
vA � '4• ■ Cl)o
U
v m
�,,I , ., E
� p'
a)
,�
a
>
CA
' III
Z
'\ 11
C
cz
a. y im
L■
a
U
N
V o
0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0
0
o c� ,0 re-, 4 m N "
(%) anprinum.D;uaaaad

O
A
O
r
U
O
L
U d
CO
0
L
III CD C)
c
I
I W
O�/,
II
III
`J;
1"1
.0 II r/
CD co
E
c Cl)o
� V a)
CI) 1: E
, 1- a)
t o
— .,E.
1A ''s. •
1�1 2 • k ,''■.,,, 11
o m
cri
Q,) \ ^• ,"a I.) co
}�.II 11 Q
N
' X s"I P cn
M.
Ao it
\
. � • 0_
04,, rI
CA
cu
4� y i stit
ct
P-+ * .
\
1
7� •
i o
a
— cc
U
N
V o
0 c 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0
0
o c-, co re; 4 m N
(OA) anprinuzno;uaaaad

O
A
O
r
(..)
O
L
I co
6 —A-1—
,_ o
d CDCD
i .0 7-1
1
1 0�/,
0 • W
•0 • A* I
y*y
0
A ; A Q
© ,� %� i)
" 1�C -■__, N
I ct d r
> --i o co
Mom' �,.
U ?,
U y v
``�. E
41 E U
Q-1/ •\ il
a cn
N °'
,
ill
1.) y
*
ct
t
0
1
a
U
N
r o
0 0 0 00© 0 0 0 0
0
o c- re-, 4 m N
7-4
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
O
r
t)
O
L
•
Md
W
L o
a CD
'CS o
1 ry
1
I M0
III
co
ial
I- " E
i .0
U o w
E
Q
11
Ills. ct
I
Ls
,)
v
O \�
0
\ il! a)
• co
;
ill
Z ,
111
cz
N
V o
0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0
o c-, co Le) 4 m N
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
A o
r
U
O
L
I N
m
0
L o
II d o
I
MO
0I W
.0 * A r/
y*y 0 E
E
.� V0 oo co
N
A o
o_en - o
• ��,�� N 1
c� � tcn
cn
ilii
v m
Ct E
i•a Z • * I. E
= vco
r * C
E
nt
a I • � .
cz
• �
cu ilk
ct
'N
k., N
0
a_
U
- -5
N
V o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
o c� ,0 re-, -4 m N
(OA) anprinuzno;uaaaad

O
O
r
L
CD
m
L o
■ 'a o
c,
0
■ CO
•
r/ N
M,\ .0
E
! o o
v � _
Ii
cn
ill1-1 Pml—
• 1111
o
O �t r al
a)
Z • \ 1 i
1
y ' i
■
o
TY—
tC
U
4-
N
V o
0 0 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0
0
o c-, co Le) 4 Cr) N
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
o
r
O
L
Il CD
i m
L 0
III 'CD
a 0
c-,
0
II CO
V co
ry H
A
co
ill
1-1
E
VU
co
a)I t Ct
1-1
ki'l„,..
4
AO C
fCI
i r
.. O
WI-
- fC
Cr)
Cl)
V o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
o c-N co Le) 4- m N
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
O
r
O
L
• d
m
1
L 0
T 0
c-
o
i m
111
I
I A*
N
0 . V •
: I
so
cn
cL
N A N m
N CO
•'" a)
4� •r-+ CD `_l -,• `u C� '
ill
T
N •
as1
i ias
-0 I
cz
Cr) i i
r
• o
71 I ■
A
- cC
Cr)
N
r o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 c, GC re-, 4 m N
r.
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
O
r
O
L
d
CO
■ L CD
-cs CD
7-1
0
• CO
•
.71 co
0
cn
E E
Cr) A _ _ _
N
.w N
cj 1-1
ill
�i I ``"m•
• ,
N P-+ ! -*
Lp.
,,`V
o ' `- co
V i 0
as
() N
cC
1-1
` . ` ```
' s`•
AO N •
1 _ •
1I
0
A
— cC
U
- -S
Cl)
V
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
o c- GC ,0 Le) 4 m N
(%) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

O
A
O
r
Y
U
O
L
• d
CO
• A
L 0
'CD
a 0
7-,
0
• CO
•
rI
d
.71 O
1 \:Io
0
CI v
U c co co
a)
PCI .- CD UjCt
is
74 7.i
T
M Pi
cl
O O
V ''''1 L\N N\I 1, ,._,
a�
a�
AO y
0
WI—
Cr)
N
V o
0 0 0 0 © © 00 0 0
0
ccc-N 00 .0 re-, 4- m N
(OA) anprinuzno;uaaaad

O
A
O
r
O
L
m
1
L 0
I -0 0
c-,
m
•
-
I Ay E
a) m
co
0
.0 • 0 o 0
1
4-4 L-
X L coP E
A �- E
DT'\ c co
ill
co
1-1
AO c
c
cn
1:
�� d14
• `�WI-
a
Cr)
N
r o
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o c-, co Le', 4- m N
(OA) anprinuznJ;uaaaad

APPENDIX 5—Categorical Exclusion Checklist and Summary

Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 2
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: Huntsman Mitigation Site
County Name: Wilkes County
DMS Number: 100123
Project Sponsor: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Project Contact Name: Kirsten Gimbert
Project Contact Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104,Charlotte,NC 28203
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
DMS Pro'ect Mana•er: Matthew Reid
Project Description
This project includes stream restoration and enhancement as well as establishing stormwater Best Management
Practices (BMPs).Currently,the streams are extensively impacted by agricultural management, including cattle
grazing and crop production. Project goals to provide ecological and water quality enhancements in the Yadkin
River Basin will be obtained by removing livestock access from stream channels, restoring and enhancing native
floodplain vegetation, creating stable stream banks, improving stream habitat,treating concentrated agricultural
runoff with BMPs and protecting the site in perpetuity through establishing a conservation easement.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
10-25-2019 7/'1aziry Azd
-
Date DMS Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By: "
/0—Z�/9 T7e1%a.�Gf� 5 6,u--
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of ❑Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)? D No
❑✓ N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management 0 Yes
Program? ❑ No
ElN/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been 0 Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ✓❑ No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential ❑Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑Yes
waste sites within the project area? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of ❑Yes
Historic Places in the project area? ✓❑ No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act(Uniform Act)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ✓❑Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? ❑Yes
✓❑ No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed: ✓❑Yes
*prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and ❑ No
*what the fair market value is believed to be? ❑ N/A

Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act(AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of ❑✓ Yes
Cherokee Indians? ❑ No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? 0 Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic ❑Yes
Places? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Antiquities Act(AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects 0 Yes
of antiquity? 0 No
❑✓ N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act(ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? ❑Yes
✓❑ No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? 0 Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? 0 Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Endangered Species Act(ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat ❑✓ Yes
listed for the county? ❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ✓❑Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical ❑Yes
Habitat? ❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. Is the project"likely to adversely affect"the species and/or"likely to adversely modify" ❑Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? 0 No
❑✓ N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy"determination? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A

Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" ❑Yes
by the EBCI? ❑✓ No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed 0 Yes
project? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred ❑Yes
sites? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? ❑✓ Yes
El No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally ❑✓ Yes
important farmland? ❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any 0 Yes
water body? ❑ No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? 0 Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act(Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public, ❑Yes
outdoor recreation? ❑✓ No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? 0 Yes
❑✓ No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the ❑Yes
project on EFH? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? 0 Yes
❑ No
ElN/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining ❑Yes
federal agency? El No
❑✓ N/A

Huntsman Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion
SUMMARY

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act(CERCLA)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) provides a
Federal "Superfund"to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents,
spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment.
As the Huntsman Mitigation Site is a full-delivery project; an EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was
ordered for the site through Environmental Data Resources, Inc on February 14, 2019. Neither the target
property nor the adjacent properties were listed in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental
databases searched by the EDR. While one site was identified within 0.5 mile from the target property in
the EDR Radius Map Report having a LUST(leaking underground storage tank) and an incident
management database (IMD),the site is located downstream from the target property. Overall,the
assessment revealed no evidence of any"recognized environmental conditions" in connection with the
target property.
The Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the Appendix.The full report is available if
needed.
National Historic Preservation Act(Section 106)
The National Historic Preservation Act declares a national policy of historic preservation to protect,
rehabilitate, restore, and reuse districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American
architecture, history, archaeology, and culture, and Section 106 mandates that federal agencies take
into account the effect of an undertaking on a property that is included in, or is eligible for inclusion in,
the National Register of Historic Places.
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) responded to a scoping letter requesting comment on the
Huntsman Mitigation Site on August 27, 2019. SHPO stated they were aware of"no historic resources
which would be affected by the project" and would have no further comment. All correspondence
related to Section 106 is included in the Appendix.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act(Uniform Act)
These acts, collectively known as the Uniform Act, provide for uniform and equitable treatment of
persons displaced from their homes, businesses, non-profit associations, or farms by federal and
federally-assisted programs, and establish uniform and equitable land acquisition policies.
The Huntsman Mitigation Site is a full-delivery project that includes land acquisition. Notification of the
fair market value of the project property and the lack of condemnation authority by Wildlands was
included in the signed Option Agreements for the project properties. A copy of the relevant section of
each of the Option Agreements are included in the Appendix.
rican Indian Religious Freedom Act(AIRFA)
The American Indian Religious Freedom Act provides for the protection and preservation of places of
religious importance to American Indians, Eskimos, and Native Hawaiians.
NCDMS requested review and comment from the Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office
(THPO), Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians THPO, and the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee THPO
with respect to any archeological or religious resources related to the Huntsman Mitigation Site on
August 26, 2019. At this time, NCDMS has not received a response from the aforementioned tribes.
All correspondence related to AIRFA is included in the Appendix.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
DMS#100123 1

Endangered Species Act(ESA)
Section 7 of the ESA requires federal agencies, in consultation with and with the assistance of the
Secretary of the Interior or of Commerce, as appropriate,to ensure that actions they authorize,fund or
carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat for these species.
According to your Information for Planning and Consultation database (IPaC),the threatened or
endangered species listed within the project area located in Wilkes County, NC consists of one species:
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis). Forested habitats containing trees at least
3-inch dbh in the project area provide suitable habitat for NLEB. Due to the decline of the NLEB
population from the White Nose Syndrome (WNS),the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
has issued the finalization of a special rule under section 4(d) of the ESA to addresses the effects to the
NLEB resulting from purposeful and incidental take based on the occurrence of WNS. Because the
project is located within a WNS zone and will include the removal/clearing of trees, it is subject to the
final 4(d) ruling. A review of NCNHP records did not indicate any known NLEB populations within 2.0
mile of the study area;therefore,the project is eligible to use the NLEB 4(d) Rule Streamlined
Consultation Form to meet regulatory requirements for section 7(a)(2) compliance 4(d) consultation.
The completed NLEB 4(d) Consultation Form was submitted to the USFWS by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) on August 27, 2019.
A scoping letter requesting comment from the USFWS was sent on August 21, 2019. No response from
the USFWS was received within the 45-day response period. Therefore,the signing of the NLEB 4(d)
Rule Streamlined Consultation Form by the FHWA determines that this project may affect the NLEB, but
that any resulting incidental take of the NLEB is not prohibited by the final 4(d) rule. A FHWA signed 4(d)
Consultation Form and the correspondence associated with this determination are included in the
Appendix.
Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
The FPPA requires that, before taking or approving any federal action that would result in conversion of
farmland,the agency must examine the effects of the action using the criteria set forth in the FPPA, and,
if there are adverse effects, must consider alternatives to lessen them.
The Huntsman Mitigation Site includes the conversion of prime farmland. As such, Form AD-1006 has
been completed and submitted to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).The completed
form and correspondence documenting its submittal is included in the Appendix.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCA)
The FWCA requires consultation with the USFWS and the appropriate state wildlife agency on projects
that alter or modify a water body. Reports and recommendations prepared by these agencies document
project effects on wildlife and identify measures that may be adopted to prevent loss or damage to
wildlife resources.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) responded to a scoping letter requesting
comment on the Huntsman Mitigation Site on September 27, 2019. NCWRC stated that project
activities do not need to be avoided during a trout moratorium. NCWRC recommended that riparian
buffers be re-established using a woody buffer of approximately 100 feet on perennial streams to
maximize the benefits of buffers, including bank stability, stream shading,treatment of overland runoff,
and wildlife habitat. All project streams included in the Huntsman Mitigation Site will have adequate
riparian buffers. No known records of state or federally-listed rare,threatened, or endangered species
Huntsman Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
DMS#100123 2

within or near the project area were provided. All correspondence with the two agencies is included in
the appendix.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)
The MBTA makes it unlawful for anyone to kill, capture, collect, possess, buy, sell,trade, ship, import, or
export any migratory bird.The indirect killing of birds by destroying their nests and eggs is covered by
the MBTA, so construction in nesting areas during nesting seasons can constitute a taking.
Wildlands requested comment on the Huntsman Mitigation Site from the USFWS in regard to migratory
birds on August 21, 2019.The USFWS has not responded at this time. All correspondence with USFWS is
included in the Appendix.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
DMS#100123 3

APPENDIX 6—IRT Communications

bil
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
MEETING NOTES
MEETING: Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
HUNTSMAN Mitigation Site
Yadkin 03040102;Wilkes County, NC
DEQ Contract No. 7891
DMS Project No. 100123
Wildlands Project No. 005-02183
DATE: Wednesday,July 24, 2019
LOCATION: Ingle Hollow Road
New Castle, NC
Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE Kirsten Ullman, DMS Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands
Kim Browning, USACE Periann Russel, DMS Christine Blackwelder,Wildlands
Paul Wiesner, DMS Erin Davis, DWR Daniel Johnson,Wildlands
Matthew Reid, DMS Mac Haupt, DWR
Materials
• Wildlands Engineering Technical Proposal dated 3/6/2019 in response to DMS RFP 16-007728
Meeting Notes
The meeting began at 12:30 pm. Shawn presented an overview of the project at the parking location. From
there,the group walked across Little Hunting Creek to the headwaters of UT2, retraced steps and reviewed the
piped portion of UT1 and Pond 3. The meeting concluded at 2:00 PM.
1. Overall comments
• Todd asked if the project team would pursue additional credits for wide buffers via the GIS buffer tool.
He encouraged the team to run the tool since the project captures headwater drainages on UT1 and
much of UT2 and provides wide buffers on Little Hunting Creek.
• The project does not currently include wetlands for credit. Todd mentioned that the JD will be
important for quantifying existing resources on the site, and that it is likely that there will be a net gain
of wetlands.
• Kim noted that it would be helpful to receive any available information on onsite culverts in advance
of site visits in the future.
2. Little Hunting Creek
• Little Hunting Creek has a drainage area of 2 square miles. The stream has eroded banks but is not
deeply incised due to bedrock, which will facilitate a Priority 1 design.

HUNTSMAN Mitigation Site—IRT Meeting Notes
• Group agreed that restoration is appropriate on Little Hunting Creek.
• Shawn explained that a restrictive covenant will be used to exclude cattle from a ditch joining Little
Hunting Creek at the upstream property boundary. IRT saw this as favorable and supportive to the
project.
3. Old Bus Branch
• Shawn walked through the I/P calls made in February during our proposal investigation. The
intermittent stream call began at the 3-foot headcut and perennial began at the bottom of the 10-foot
headcut. The group agreed the JD will be important for this tributary, and that stabilization of the
headcuts with a BMP would be beneficial if the stream is not jurisdictional up to those points.
Wildlands agreed.
• The IRT members requested that Wildlands include a note regarding this discussion in the Mitigation
Plan so that this reach and the proposed design approach can be reviewed at that time.
4. Trapper and Rifle Tributaries
• These two streams flow through wet, headwater seep areas. IRT would prefer to see Enhancement 2
of these tributaries,to include excluding cattle and treating invasives.
• Wildlands foresees the need to install several log sills on Rifle Tributary to prevent headcutting into the
wetland complex.
5. UT2
• The group reviewed UT2. At the upstream extent of UT2 within the Enhancement 2 section of stream,
Todd suggested the alignment be pulled off the left toe of slope for approximately 50 LF where there is
some stream bank erosion. This additional effort, combined with the channel work proposed upstream
of the culvert crossing, would be worthy of 2.5:1 credit as opposed to the 3:1 credit presented in the
proposal.
• The group agreed that restoration of UT2 was appropriate given the incision and erosion observed
downstream of the culvert crossing and the obvious ditching within the floodplain of Little Hunting
Creek.
• Kim asked if Wildlands was concerned with loss of hydrology when UT2 is raised. Shawn said that there
have been no site indications to date that hydrology would be lost, and that the stream has had strong
flow during all site visits.
6. Barn Branch
• The disturbed feeding lot area upstream of Barn Branch appears to be a wetland now. Todd suggested
eliminating the BMP proposed here and widening the conservation easement to protect the headwater
wetland instead.
7. UT1(upstream of road)
• The group reviewed the drop structure at the road crossing. There are three culverts contributing flow
within the drop structure (one from the north,two from the east) and one which outlets under Ingle
Hollow Road. UT1 currently drops in the top of the structure through a grate.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
HUNTSMAN Mitigation Site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk

HUNTSMAN Mitigation Site—IRT Meeting Notes
o Group asked if this culvert and drop structure will be revised. Revising the culvert is not part of
the restoration plan. The structure is likely within the DOT right of way, but we won't know for
sure until the survey is complete.
o The culvert from the north and one from the east were flowing. Wildlands does not currently
know where the culvert flow originates from.
• Pond 3 has large headcuts totaling over 10 feet in height approaching the dam. The wetted width of
the pond is approximately 300 feet. Erin expressed concern that removing the dam could result in
functional loss of open water habitat and that the buffer won't extend to the original wetted pond
width. The group asked how the pond bottom will be restored. Wildlands needs to complete a
topographic survey of the embankment and pond bottom to inform the design, but it is likely that the
excavated pond embankment material will be used to rebuild the approximate original valley in the old
pond 3 pond bed. Shawn reminded group that advancing headcuts will eventually result in dam failure,
and loss of the normal pool is inevitable.
• UT1 is buried within 300 LF of pipe upstream of pond 3. The group reviewed the pipe inlet. Mac
commented that the restoration of UT1 will require major earth moving. Wildlands is aware and
Periann commented that the project scored well because of the removal of barriers.
• Group requested inclusion of a good discussion of existing condition topographic/soil surveys done
along UT1 and the design decisions made regarding stream and valley restoration in the mitigation
plan.
• Shawn suggested that a design memo may need to be developed in advance of the mitigation plan for
the area to ensure that the IRT is on board with design decisions on this reach. Substantial changes to
proposed buffer widths or pond removal considered as an impact would need to be considered before
the project is too far along. Wildlands will discuss this further with DMS.
These meeting minutes were prepared by Christine Blackwelder on July 25, 2019, and reviewed by Shawn Wilkerson on July
31, 2019, and represent the authors'interpretation of events. Please report and discrepancies or corrections within 5
business days of receipt of these minutes.
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. page 3
HUNTSMAN Mitigation Site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk

APPENDIX 7—Invasive Species Plan

Appendix 7 Invasive Species Plan
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project.These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. If, during the
monitoring period, invasive species threaten the survivability of planted woody vegetation in an area
that exceeds 1%of the planted easement acreage,the invasive species shall be treated. Smaller areas
may be treated at the discretion of the project engineer and biologist, if deemed in the best interest of
the Site. Generally,the treatment plan shall follow the below guidelines in Table 1 for common invasive
species found in riparian areas; however,the treatment may be changed based on the professional
judgement of the project engineer and biologist. For invasive species not listed in the below table that
threaten the survivability of the planted woody vegetation, Wildlands shall notify DMS of the invasive
species observed and the plan for treatment prior to treating the species. All invasive species treatment
will be reported in the following year's monitoring plan.
Table 1.Invasive Species Treatment—Huntsman Mitigation Site
Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Foliar treatment of large populations with 4%glyphosate solution. Cut stump treatment is
Multiflora Rose time consuming,though effective. Treat in spring/summer. Biocontrol using viral
(Rosa multiflora) pathogen of rose-rosette disease transmitted by European Rose Chalcid wasp is an option.
Rose-rosette disease is also vectored by native mites.
Small infestations of L.japonica can be pulled by hand. Monitor to remove any re-sprouts.
Care should be taken to bag and remove the plants, including mature fruits to prevent re-
establishment. Large infestations of L.japonica will usually require a combination of cut
Honeysuckle stump and foliar herbicide treatments.Where vines have grown into the tree canopy,cut
each stem as close to the ground as possible.Treat the freshly cut surface of the rooted
(Lonicera stem with a 25 percent solution of glyphosate or triclopyr. Remove the twining vines to
japonica) prevent them from girdling and killing desirable vegetation. Groundcovers of L.japonica
can be treated with a foliar solution of 2 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent
non-ionic surfactant to thoroughly wet all the leaves.
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant: a
glyphosate herbicide as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) in the late fall or
early winter when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired,or elsewhere,Arsenal AC*
as a 1-percent solution (4 ounces per 3-gallon mix). Backpack mist blowers can broadcast
glyphosate as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Escort XP* at 1 ounce
per acre (0.2 dry ounces per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons per acre)during winter for safety
to dormant hardwoods.Summer applications of glyphosate may not be as effective as
other times and require a higher percent solution.The best time for Arsenal AC* and Escort
Chinese Privet XP* is summer to fall. For stems too tall for foliar sprays and when safety to surrounding
(Ligustrum vegetation is desired,apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per
sinense) 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant,or
fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere,apply
Stalker* as a 6-to 9-percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil
product,vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant,or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where
permitted)to young bark as a basal spray making certain to treat all stems in a clump; or
cut and immediately treat the stump tops with Arsenal AC* as a 5-percent solution (20
ounces per 3-gallon mix)or Velpar L* as a 10-percent solution in water(1 quart per 3-
gallon mix)with a surfactant.When safety to surrounding vegetation is desired,
immediately treat stump tops and sides with Garlon 3A or with a glyphosate herbicide as a
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 1

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in water with a surfactant. ORTHO Brush-B-
Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for treating cut-stumps and available
in retail garden stores(safe to surrounding plants). For large stems, make stem injections
using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired,Garton 3A or a
glyphosate herbicide using dilutions and cut-spacings specified on the herbicide label
(anytime except March and April).An EZ-Ject tree injector can help to reach the lower part
of the main stem;otherwise, every branching trunk must be hack-and-squirt injected.
Trees: Make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is
desired, Garton 3A or Milestone in dilutions as specified on the herbicide label (anytime
except March and April). For felled trees,apply the herbicides to stump tops immediately
after cutting. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for
treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores(safe to surrounding plants).
Saplings:Apply a basal spray to young bark using Garton 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints
per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil or mineral oil with a
penetrant,or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted
Mimosa
Pathfinder II. Elsewhere,apply Stalker* as a 6-to 9-percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-
(Albizia julibrissin)
gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil, kerosene,or diesel fuel (where
permitted).
Resprouts and seedlings:Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in
water with a surfactant:
From June to August,either Escort XP at 1 ounce per acre(0.2 ounces per 3-gallon mix)
plus a glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution addition (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix)or
Milestone VM Plus at 6 to 9 pints per acre(1.5 to 3 pints per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons
per acre).
From July to September,Transline* t or Milestone as a 0.25-percent solution plus Garlon
3A as a 4-percent solution (1 ounce plus 5 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant
Chinese Yam before aerial bulbils form: Garlon 3A or Garlon 4 as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-
gallon mix). Chinese yam bulbils will take up the herbicide;the other species must be
(Dioscorea collected and destroyed (not composted). For safety to surrounding plants,cut climbing
polystachya) plants just above the soil surface and immediately treat the freshly cut stem with Garlon
3A in a 50-percent solution (6 quarts in a 3-gallon mix).
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant
(July to October):Garlon 4,Garlon 3A,or a glyphosate herbicide as a 3-percent solution (12
ounces per 3-gallon mix).
For stems too tall for foliar sprays,to control vines less than 1-inch diameter,apply Garlon
4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product or
Oriental vegetable oil. Or cut large stems and immediately treat the cut surfaces with one of the
Bittersweet
following herbicides in water with a surfactant:Garlon 4 or a glyphosate herbicide as a 25-
(Celastrus percent solution (32 ounces per 1-gallon mix). ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush
orbiculatus) Killer are effective for treating cutstumps and readily available in retail garden stores(safe
to surrounding plants).Winter applications are effective.
For large vines, make stem injections using Garlon 3A,or a glyphosate herbicide using
dilutions and cut-spacings specified on the herbicide label (anytime except March and
April).The EZ-Ject tree injector assists in reaching through entanglements to treat,and the
glyphosate shells have been found effective in winter.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 2

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Trees: For stems too tall for foliar sprays,cut large stems and immediately treat the stump
tops with Garton 3A or a glyphosate herbicide as a 25-to 50-percent solution (2 to 6 quarts
per 3-gallon mix).
Callery Pear Saplings:Apply Garton 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled
(Pyrus calleryana) basal oil product,vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant.
Seedlings.Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a
surfactant: a glyphosate herbicide or Garton 3A as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-
gallon mix).
Large trees: Make stem injections and then apply Garton 3A when safety to surrounding
vegetation is desired,or Pathway* or Arsenal AC* in dilutions and cut-spacings specified on
the herbicide label (midsummer best, late winter somewhat less effective). For felled trees,
apply the herbicides to stem and stump tops immediately after cutting.
Tree of Heaven Saplings:Apply as basal sprays in mixed in a labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil or
(Ailanthus mineral oil with a penetrant,or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted) using Garton 4 as a
altissima) 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix)when safety to surrounding vegetation is
Seedlings and saplings:Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in
water with a surfactant(July to October):Garton 4 as a 1-to 2-percent solution (4 to 8
ounces per 3-gallon mix)or Garton 3A as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 3

APPENDIX 8—Site Protection Instrument

Appendix 8 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
portions of the Johnson family parcels listed in Table 1.These properties are optioned for purchase of a
conservation easement by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands). Wildlands will record a conservation
easement on the parcels to encompass the streams being restored and enhanced along with their
corresponding buffers. Wildlands' option agreement with the Johnsons also allows Wildlands to place a
restrictive covenant on a ditch/wetland feature which joins North Little Hunting Creek in the southwest
corner of the project.The restrictive covenant will prevent cattle access to the drainage feature.
Table 1:Site Protection Instrument—Huntsman Mitigation Site
Under Memorandum of
Parcel ID Option to Option Agreement Acreage to be
Property Owner Number County Purchase by Deed Book(DB)and Protected
Wildlands? Page Number(PG)
4827-87-1278, Deed Book 653,
Jerry A. and Debra Lynn 4827-96-5044, Wilkes Yes Page 160 and Deed 19.1
Johnson 4827-84-8574, Book 621, Page 14
4827-95-0384
The conservation easement template that will be used for recordation is included in this appendix. All
site protection instruments require 60-day advance notification to the USACE and or DMS prior to any
action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved by the
State.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 8
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 1

hAPV ss
EXHIBIT B T 1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
COUNTY
SPO File Number:
DMS Project Number:
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to:NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS,made
this day of , 20_, by Landowner name goes here
, ("Grantor"), whose mailing address is Landowner address Roes here ,to the State of
North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of
Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1321. The
designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq,, the State
of North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 1 of 11

protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat,wildlife
habitat,and recreational opportunities;and
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between ( insert name and
address of fell delivery contract provider ) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality, to provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality Purchase and Services Contract Number
WHEREAS,The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding, (MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU
recognized that the Wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory
mitigation for authorized impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring,
enhancing and preserving the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and
WHEREAS,the Department of Environment and Natural Resources,the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service entered into an agreement to continue the In-Lieu Fee operations of the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services(formerly Ecosystem
Enhancement Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces
the previously effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was "granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh,North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environmental
Quality,which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and Council of State
to the Department of Administration,has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 2 of 11

WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in Township, County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being
more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book at Page
of the County Registry,North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the
areas of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions and
purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access Rights.
The Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of if known,
insert name of stream,branch, river or waterway here.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns; forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Tracts Number containing a total of acres as shown on the plats
of survey entitled"Final Plat, Conservation Easement for North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services, Project Name: , SPO File No. , EEP Site No.
Property of ," dated , 20_ by name of surveyor.,
PLS Number and recorded in the County,North Carolina Register
of Deeds at Plat Book Pages
See attached"Exhibit A",Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Conservation Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries,
aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the
Conservation Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to
prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these
purposes. To achieve these purposes,the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns,personal representatives,agents,lessees, and licensees.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 3 of 11

II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area
by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units,
derived from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong
to the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited,restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation
Easement Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey
plat.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to
engage in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this
Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such
purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations.
Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation,hydrology or topography of the site,
D. Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded
survey plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or
vegetation that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or
natural habitat, all cutting, removal,mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation
in the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and
commercial uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland,waste lagoons,or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole,tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 4 of 11

All existing roads,trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement Area shall be shown on
the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except
interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the
Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the
use of the Conservation Easement Area. -
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement
Area is prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel,
rock,peat,minerals,or other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering
or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or
shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may
temporarily be withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the
Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple ("fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
•
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants,trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown,provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1652.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation casement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 5 of 11

III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Right of Access,Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee,its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Conservation Easement Area
over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities on the property to restore,
construct, manage, maintain, enhance, protect, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other
riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities
or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation
Easement,the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
manmade materials as needed to direct in-stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following; describe
the project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project
boundaries and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee)in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the
investment and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which
would cause financial harm to the State.Therefore,Landowners(Grantor)with livestock are
required to restrict livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so
may result in the State(Grantee)repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices(fences)
within the conservation area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the
landowner(Grantor)must provide access to the State(Grantee)to make repairs.
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however,the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor,his successors or assigns.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or
features in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the
Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the
Grantor shall have ninety(90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by
such breach. If the breach and damage remains uncured after ninety(90) days, the Grantee may
enforce this Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an
action to recover damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 6 of 11

power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Conservation Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation
Easement; (b)to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or(c) to seek damages
from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the
immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other
appropriate relief, if the breach is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the
benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights
and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all
other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the
right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at
reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying
with the terms,conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement
shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change
in the Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the
Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from
any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate,or mitigate significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
I). Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including,without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property
are the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 7 of 11

obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to
the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address.and any party to whom
the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made.
Grantor further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any
interest in the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable
laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the
Property shall notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing
sixty (60) days prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any
request to void or modify this Conservation Easement, Such notifications and modification
requests shall be addressed to:
Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel -
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington,NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in
gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in
the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 8 of 1I

VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet
enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 9 of 11

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
(SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of ,20 .
Notary Public
My commission expires:
•
NCDMS Pull Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 10 of 11

Exhibit A
[INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION]
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 11 of 11

APPENDIX 9—Maintenance Plan

Appendix 9 Maintenance Plan
The site shall be visited semi-annually and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met.These site inspections may identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following:
Table 1. Maintenance Plan—Huntsman Mitigation Site
Component/
Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping,securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental installations
of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel—these shall be conducted
where success criteria are threatened or at the discretion of the Designer.Areas where
Stream storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to
prevent bank failures and head-cutting. Beaver activity will be monitored and beaver dams
on project streams will typically be removed,at the discretion of the Designer,during the
monitoring period to allow for bank stabilization and stream development outside of this
type of influence.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
Vegetation pruning, mulching,and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species requiring treatment per the
Invasive Species Treatment Plan (Appendix 7)shall be treated in accordance with that plan
and with NC Department of Agriculture(NCDA) rules and regulations.
BMPs BMPs are expected to vegetate over time and transition to vegetative filter strips. BMPs will
not be maintained after close out.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
Site boundary bollard, post,tree-blazing,or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed,damaged,or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as-needed basis.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 1

APPENDIX 10—Financial Assurance

Appendix 10 Financial Assurances
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service's In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010,the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources has provided
the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects to
satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by DMS.This commitment provides financial assurance for all
mitigation projects implemented by the program.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 10
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 1

APPENDIX 11—Credit Calculations and Release Schedule

Appendix 11 - Credit Release Schedule and Supporting Information
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the approved final
mitigation plan, unless there are significant discrepancies, in which case an addendum will be proposed
to the IRT. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary
Department of the Army (DA) authorization has been received for its construction or the District
Engineer(DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA
authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project.The DE, in consultation with the
Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently
to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where some performance standards
have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may
be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the
specified performance standard.
The following conditions apply to the credit release schedules:
A. A reserve of 10%of a site's total stream credits will be released after four bankfull events have
occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards
are met. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period,
release of these reserve credits is at the discretion of the NCIRT.
B. For mitigation banks, implementation of the approved Mitigation Plan must be initiated no later
than the first full growing season after the date of the first credit transaction (credit sale).
C. After the second milestone,the credit releases are scheduled to occur on an annual basis,
assuming that the annual monitoring report has been provided to the USACE in accordance with
the General Monitoring Requirements, and that the monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards are being met and that no other concerns have been identified
on-site during the visual monitoring. All credit releases require written approval from the
USACE.
D. The credits associated with the final credit release milestone will be released only upon a
determination by the USACE, in consultation with the NCIRT, of functional success as defined in
the Mitigation Plan.
The schedule below lists the updated credit release schedules for stream and wetland mitigation
projects developed by bank and ILF sites in North Carolina:
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 11
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 1

Table A:Stream Credit Release Schedule
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Streams
Credit ILF/NCDMS
Release Release Activity Interim Total
Milestone Release Released
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan 30% 30%
2*
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
3
interim performance standards have been met 10% 40%
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
interim performance standards have been met 10% 50%
4
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
5
interim performance standards have been met 10% 60%
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 65%
interim performance standards have been met 5%
6** (75% )
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 75%
7 interim performance standards have been met 10% (85%***)
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 80%
8** interim performance standards have been met 5% (90%...)
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable, 90%
performance standards have been met 10% (100%9
...)
*For ILF sites(including all NCDMS projects), no initial release of credits(Milestone 1) is provided because ILF
programs utilized advance credits,so no initial release is necessary to help fund site construction.To account for
this,the 15%credit release associated with the first milestone(bank establishment) is held until the second
milestone,so that the total credits release at the second milestone is 30%. In order for NCDMS to receive the
30%release(shown in the schedules as Milestone 2),they must comply with the credit release requirements
stated in Section IV(I)(3) of the approved NCDMS Instrument.
**Please note that vegetation data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during these
monitoring years unless otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT.
***10%reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Huntsman Mitigation Site Appendix 11
DMS ID No. 100123 Page 2

Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Site Name: Huntsman Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00836
NCDWR Project Number:
Sponsor: NC Dvision of Mitigation Services
County: Wilkes
Minimum Required Buffer Width': 30
Mitigation Ratio Creditable Stream
Mitigation Type Baseline Stream Credit
Multiplier' Length'
Restoration(1:1) 1 5397.777 5397.78
Enhancement I(1.5:1) 1.5 0
Enhancement II(2.5:1) 2.5 594.602 237.84
Preservation(5:1) 5
Other(7.5:1) 7.5
Other(10:1) 10
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals 5992.38 5635.62
Buffer Width Zone(feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
Buffer Zones less than 15 feet >15 to 20 feet >20 to 25 feet >25 to 30 feet >30 to 50 feet >50 to 75 feet >75 to 100 feet >100 to 125 feet >125 to 150 feet
Max Possible Buffer(square feet)" 179771.37 59923.79 59923.79 59923.79 239695.16 299618.95 299618.95 299618.95 299618.95
Ideal Buffer(square feet)' 184209.68 60807.60 59883.85 58844.49 227808.83 275117.81 268951.88 263881.38 260830.28
Actual Buffer(square feet)' 174204.23 56978.10 55771.43 54398.10 142719.94 64130.71 46314.03 38464.68 29192.77
Zone Multiplier 50% 20% 15% 15% 9% 7% 6% 5% 3%
Buffer Credit Equivalent 2817.81 1127.12 845.34 845.34 507.21 394.49 338.14 281.78 169.07
Percent of Ideal Buffer 95% 94% 93% 92% 63% 23% 17% 15% 11%
Credit Adjustment -153.05 -70.98 -58.05 -63.88 317.76 91.96 58.23 41.07 18.92
Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in
Total Baseline Credit Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
5635.62 -345.96 527.94 181.98 5817.60
'Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank(50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30feet in mountain counties)
2Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios,which are equal to the number of feet in the feet-to-credit mitigation ratio(e.g.,for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit,the multiplier would be 8
'Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type.If stream reaches are not creditable,they should be excluded from this measurement,even if they fall within the easement
'This amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width.This number is not used in calculations,but is provided as a reference.
'Maximum potential size(in square feet)of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches,calculated using GIS,including areas outside of the easement.The inner zone(0-15')should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known. Non-creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
'Square feet in each buffer zone,as measured by GIS,excluding non-forested areas,all other credit type(e.g.,wetland,nutrient offset,buffer),easement exceptions,open water,areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard,etc.Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width,so areas within the easement that
are more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement. Non-creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS

At4fr iik ,-
Conservation Easement
Forested Buffer(TOB to 30')
' Forested Buffer(30'to 150')
. :t Ideal Buffer(TOB to 150')
- .. I- Top Of Bank(Approx.)
jInternal Crossings
"� Stream Alignment
l.
•4,:f` , !
1
$41'-. .:# e ., . . . . - . _.
?'a •_ , • j . j: ......jig , y _r,
4.
�.
.-,,i-,-. .1M.f=
t filli6'.
,,m+ .
,- "7 y =
-1,•i .
- . -6
l y_
t'
` te a i
.
_z: .i.y. e } ��
7
_ . _. .
a-;.k�. North Little Hunting Creek
.:.,,o';,.' jo.....\
rod`:'°,` .►�.
fildfr
f. . _ f R-".s I - - r -
it-
f _
.,4,t _ .--- f. r-- . ,- - - i a ,
0, Ott -41'.- , ' 0
a •
c." & any way.
r .. fi . 1/4 LI\ -‘,L.
e• .
4.Srr y. :ftr�� ,, TA.. Old Bus Branch
'.'Y•- :} "p r .', ` ' � `'� r
4N_ - .r , • ! : , - �,..,$ `aF-. "'ir: .� i4r'^1 -+ +a - - -`
. . .„.
; r a .:� ' ^ ..
2018 Aerial Photography
Buffer Credit Calculation Map
014WILDLANDS
Q 200 400 Feet Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING , Yadkin River Basin(03040102)
N Wilkes County, NC

APPENDIX 12—Preliminary Plans

/ V
,, Huntsman Stream Mitigation Site2 i,, ,
Wilkes County, North Carolina ��w z
Qz lio
Yadkin River Basin 03040102 .w 2 a
for
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services �>
g I
Sheet Index
- I%New Caide Title Sheet 0.1
ittir:','„
General Notes and Symbols 0.2
4s y
I N Project Overview 0.3
sM
,, Typical Sections 1.1.1-1.5.1 ct
o Environmental c
'r; 4b Stream Plan and Profile 2.1.1 2.5.1 p
"A Quality North Little Hunting Creek 2.1.1-2.1.5
UT1 2.2.1-2.2.5 bA U
UT2 2.3.12.3.4 + +-
rr HoF Rifle Tributary and Trapper Tributary 2.4.1
Old Bus Branch 2.5.1 Z
Barn Branch 2.6.1 E
P0 Additional Grading 3.0-3.1 -- S F"
Meftn a�A1i f
O
err4 Planting Plan 4.0-4.4 ct U
c?
Erosion and Sediment Control Reserved 1
ite
SITE 5
Details 6.1-6.11
Fencing Plan 7.0
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
Project Directory
Engineering: Owner:
Wildlands Engineering,Inc Matthew Reid
License No.F-0831 NCDEQ
PRELIMINARY PLANS 1430 South Mint Street,Suite 104 Division of Mitigation Services
BEFORE YOU DIG! ISSUED WITH MITIGATION PLAN FOR DMS REVIEW
Charlotte,NC282o3 1652Mai1ServiceCenter
ec CALL 1-800-632-4949 Aaron Earley,PE Raleigh,NC 27699
N.C.ONE-CALL CENTER FEBRUARY 2 2021
IT'S THE LAW! 704-332-7754
DMS ID No.100123
NCDEQ Contract No.7891 c
E Surveying: USACE Action ID No.SAW-2019-00836
"u
Turner Land Surveying r,o a'u o
x u
P.O.Box148 ro
1-1
Swannanoa,NC 28778
CD
David S.Turner,PLS W
919-827-0745
2 E m m
v 2 , 1i
g 9 O E.O U D9
^

I
'\ V 1
\
Off,<)Opx 0�\ N/F . t
i 2 P',
JERRY A.
and N Q
L6
CF DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON . 0 H a
� \ D.B.0668,PG.110
� PIN:4827-97-1287
Ice
CF
sJ ,
k
�J O g�F �'. / ^C '`�I
Ni
T \ ,�y� ` i JERRY A. c5J 0 \ 5 ce/
?� sJ /�F and \�30'WIDE DUKE ENERGY ti
'� \ �� DEBRA LYNNJOHNSON UTILITY EASEMENT •
• \ ��� D.B.0621,PG.14 OJJOJ�' (DB 0194,PG 054) •' �• i�
\ JJ _ �, PIN:4827-96-5044 .,' ,.
\ ® F4111.
J o CF \� ` , OJOJ� \ —y• �
''''''''\
7 :Ille(
stiF \ e `�� ���a� ••y \ '
� 4
? d \ CF�, � � O P xoo_• x
..1 J V �� �. �� \ �� S.NARK ����� 0�� 1;� . 3ti m � CU
and L�
sJ \ OJ'c,OJ� MICHELLE R.CASS �rO ,Z.�' •� rsi
\ \ \, Ice O E D.B.0723,PG.527 \ I F-
Op t PIN:4827-95-4754 fi% w \ ;�
O
•
F
sop �; 1 o
u
S � . Sx0W o �
pp -,�-'ppF FT i \�
''Op \ yd p A A\ o ..• 6, . 1 •. ti •-,
, ff •_ ~ • M \�pipF • 3j w u u� 1 f m
41, 2, ,,,x .. ,.L ..L t
jiti J as ® j ( C . ,,,-'m V
\\p •
d0\p ��\ C�� • .I•� F ��� Sy, \ CIS •O
pp\ i SA: 220 220+31 .•` c.�. '', \ / . A° FFT ar. O
L 4A FFT ' , N. ee' ?3 4•
�so0 ??S '►'' ®' �� ' GC �� 3 U
. .-���. , �,
CO /NY
•allil
OGF.\�� /' F • sJ L<Cz 1�'. v F�-I
30'WIDE DUKE ENERGY\0(/0 O ... • ' .><�" 310+00 sJ .r \ F�-•I
UTILITY EASEMENT 0 "fir
h v� S C� I S
(DB 0602,PG 329) FA'r 4#0''' ti� ti `+' it yF \
‘.;, , „sr .v, ,co
♦\ • c, N/F T CE �5��
j JERRY A. 9� \
0G4 and iald"y o 250+00
�' DEBRA LYNN JOHNSONn CF 18 F n * , \
N/Fer.,..,
D.B.0986,PG.193 O F� '^ o `JERRY A. \ o mand p PIN:4827-94-1858 O A,. C
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON \ •c.) '
D.B.0653,PG.160 ,y,OGe OG �,. � .1 ‘ �.
PIN:4827-95-0384 ; 1 ryj \\p 'rlj�i0
• N
\ ?�\ G �p � �
` 1.7
op O J
oC 0, 0k
CF
u" \ 41- U
E ell N/F t<`
WILLIAMJODYGRAY N/F ��` m W / m w u O
D.B.1087,PG.105 JERRY A. c� 4 x U
PIN:4827-75-8017 and \.),
2 DEBRA LYNNHNSON
I D.B.0653,PG.160
/ PIN:4827-84-8574 m"00 w O
0' 100' 150' 200' / % w
y (HORIZONTAL) m O
if,u�. iv q a

/ V 1
cA
z Construction Notes
Notes to be included with Final Plans Q
zoo
t W P;�w
� �
Q
irl i
Existing Features Proposed Features Proposed Structures Erosion Control Features c ct
•.
Existing Property Line CE CE CE Proposed Conservation Easement O
Proposed Various Constructed Riffles To be included with final plans. o -�-I
----- 100 Existing Major Contour (5'Interval) CE-IX CE-IX Proposed Stream Crossing See Sheets 6.1-6.2 4 c O
�
- - Existing Minor Contour —TCE TCE TCE— Proposed Temporary Construction Easement fJf E
rrrrl Proposed Rock Cascade with Pools a..i
---TB TB--- Existing Top of Bank - - Proposed Thalweg Alignment J See Detail 3,Sheet 6.4
t con
72
•••-••••-••••-• Proposed Bankfull `.�"
Existing Edge of Water —• z P �
VI '%�` Proposed Brush ToeE
OU OU OU Existing Overhead Utility Line irro Proposed Major Contour(5'Interval) '.'•��`I�Q,; See Sheet6.5 (�
OUE OUE Existing Overhead Utility Easement Proposed Minor Contour ; 'Z
7�
( Proposed Vegetated Soil Lift (J')
P P y See Detail 1,Sheet 6.3 f
Existing Utility Pole Proposed Structures tX
x x x Existing Fencej0-' Proposed Rock Toe Protection E '6 u
� See Detail 2,Sheet 6.3 V7
a--� 4
Existing Storm Pipe r Proposed Angled Log Drop �
See Detail 2,Sheet 6.2 S
Y\\\\\\\\\\\k {' { F Proposed BMP with Rock Weir Outlet
`'\\\\\\\\\\\k
i Existing Building a0 { { See Detail 2,Sheet 6.7
Q Proposed Logi-hook
' -'-' ""` ""` ""` ""` ' Existing Wetland See Detail 3,Sheet 6.2 -'-'-'-' Proposed BMP-Rock Cascade with Pools
-,-,-,-,- See Detail 3,Sheet 6.4
= Proposed Log Vane
° a Existing Farm Road �/ See Detail 4,Sheet 6.3 Proposed Culvert Crossing
j/// To Be Revised with Final Plans,Sheet 6.6
�
c/ Existing Rip Rap < t I Proposed Rock Sill
�� See Detail 2,Sheet 6.3
Proposed Debris Removal
Existing Bedrock
3 Proposed Boulder Cross Vane
\�\ See Detail 3,Sheet 6.4 1 III III
0 LLLLLLLLLI Proposed Additional Grading
Existing Tree LLLLLLLLLI- I
_LLLLLLLLLI
LLLLLLLLLI
ci
Existing Tree Line All Log 1-Hook
See Detail 4,Sheet 6.2
FEMA FEMA Existing FEMA Floodway
E Topographic Survey completed by Turner
Mapping and Surveying in March 2020.Parcel m w u m
= Boundary survey completed by Turner Mapping h'¢U O
gi and Surveying in March 2020. Cr)
Types of Constructed Riffles used at certain O
locations may be modified at Engineer's
Discretion.
w
72
X z E ',2m
E. 1
J`

/ V 1
VI
Q
Zoo
t ri
�
Q6
I-�z ,H,z,
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS
22' ►
6.3' .1— 9.4' .1— 6.3'
3 1.8' 2' ^
1 3.5..1 PROPOSED BANKFULL Y
PROPOSED GRADE
ct
North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1 -Riffle •j
STA: 100+37-107+87
Not to Scale 0
.
bA Ut z
C .5 .,
-czt x `n
ft
u
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS Q
6 z
32' IE 4
19.4' 1—, 2.2' 1—, 10.4'
1.8'
7:1 1
PROPOSED BANKFULL 5.2'
1 2
3.6'
2'1
3
PROPOSED GRADE
ci
m W U E
N Q UT Q ^1
N o •
o
North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1 -Pool W
72 STA: 100+37-107+87
lgl x Not to Scale E legm
z E.
q a 1
J`

/ V22,
z
Q
z� �o
t ri
�
Q6
I-�z ,H�
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS /7._ TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS
23'
6.3' - 10.4' - 6.3'
... .. ... ..
3 S 2 1.8' IIIROPOSEDIDE
Ni
SEDBANKFULL
a)
North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2-Riffle cis N
STA: 107+87-118+80 p '5
Ct U
Cll
U o
Ez E
Ord
_it s
� m 4
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN GRADING PER PLANS
32' —
19.4' — 2.2' — 10.4' —
1.8'
7:1 L
5.2' 1 PROPOSED BANKFULL
2
1 3.6'
PROPOSED GRADE
E
8 EA cm W U E
gQxQ N
ro •
North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2-Pool 1-1
STA: 107+87-118+80 m
w
733
X E m m
z , q a 1 J`

/ V 1
cA
Q
Zoo
t � �U w
z
— 5.7' — 26 2`'2
--1w
TIE TO PROPOSED 1.8' 2.1' 1.8' TIE TO PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN PER FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS PLANS
— 4.5' —
PROPOSED BANKFULL ��
1.5' 1.5' 1.5' 1^PROPOSED GRADE
TIE TO PROPOSED TIE TO PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN PER FLOODPLAIN PER �Y
�
PLANS PLANS
_...._...._....T...._...._...._.... UT1 Typical B-Riffle
0.5'
3'Z I 3:1 STA: 200+27-201+20
PROPOSED BANKFULL STA: 202+24-211+10
PROPOSED GRADE STA: 212+00-214+84
— 8.2' —
UT1 Typical A-Riffle },
STA: 200+00-200+27 - `t
TIE TO PROPOSED TIE TO PROPOSED
STA: 201+20-202+24 FLOODPLAIN PER — 3.9' --- 2.3' 2' FLOODPLAIN PER
STA: 211+10-212+00 PLANS PLANS 0
•
I-I V)
t cJ O
3.1 .3' y5ti PROPOSED BANKFULL r�
1 �
S E" •u1
PROPOSED GRADE (f) ,�,
O H
Ct U
UT1 Typical B-Meander Pool m 6
STA: 200+27-201+20 S
STA: 202+24-211+10
STA: 212+00-214+84
— 6.5' —
— 8.2' —
TIE TO PROPO
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN F
FLOODPLAIN PER — 3.25' —— 3.25' — PLANS
PLANS TIE TO PROPOSED — 3.25' 1.7' — 3.25' — TIE TO PROPOSED
3 FLOODPLAIN PER FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS PLANS
Faa2..5. 1.3 PROPOSED BANKFULL
,g-I 1.3' 25:1 PROPOSED BANKFULL
i \—E PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE rA g u
•
UT1 Typical A-Pool UT1 Typical B-In-line Pool
STA: 200+00-200+27 STA: 200+27-201+20 w N 1-1
72 STA: 201+20-202+24 STA: 202+24-211+10 E t9
x STA: 211+10-212+00 STA: 212+00-214+84 = Z
o �astj

/ V 1
cA
Q
Zoo
t �
U w
z
- 6.2' - 26 �`,��`, '6
iZ q a
--1w
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS 1.8' 2.6' 1.8'
0.6'
3;Z + 3:1
\_
PROPOSED BANKFULL 4
PROPOSED GRADE
Y
UT1 Reach 2-Riffle
STA: 214+84-217+40
- 8.7' -
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS ;�
- 4.5' 2.0' 2.2' - O 0
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS 4 ct
Ct U
...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._...._. .. • o ao CN
3,1 1.5' �.y PROPOSED BANKFULL Z
ti•
O H
PROPOSED GRADECt U
UT1 Reach 2-Meander Pool m
STA: 214+84-217+40 S
- 8.7' .--
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS - 3.75' 1.2' 3.75' - TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
3
ci .g.1
1.5'
25: PROPOSED BANKFULL
21
EE
E
' PROPOSED GRADE EA"'w u m
g,, N
•
UT1 Reach 2 In line Pool N
STA: 214+84-217+40 P3
w
72
EE X E m m
z q a 1
^ o _a o n
J

/ V 1
cA
Q
Zoo
t � �u w
z
6.6' Q 6 ..,'!'4
h Z H,8,
HW
— 2.8' 1' 2.8' TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
3.5:2 0.8' 1 [,
35 PROPOSED BANKFULL /� �<�,
PROPOSED GRADE ��
UT1 Reach 3-Riffle
STA:217+98-220+21
— 9.5' ►
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS — 5.25' ►� 2' - 2.25' TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS 0-1
ct
Ct U
Cr) O
3.5:1 1.5' PROPOSED BANKFULL ,�ct
cT tt S
PROPOSED GRADE O H
ft U
UT1 Reach 3-Meander Pool E 6
STA: 217+98-220+21 cn
9.5' ►
— 4' ►— 1.5' ►— 4' ►
3 TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
PE 5.1 1 6' PROPOSED BANKFULL
25;1
E PROPOSED GRADE
EA m w u m
g Q x O co
•
UT1 Reach 3 In line Pool
N
STA: 218+62-220+89 P2
Cg w
72
X E m m
^ o _a o n
J

/ V 1
Q
Zoo
t ri
�
Q6
z ,
h _H,
5' _ ��
TIE TO PROPOSED
TIE TO PROPOSED 1.75' - 1.5' 1.75' FLOODPLAIN PER
FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
PLANS
0.5'
.5:1 I 35.1\_
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
UT2 Reach 2 Riffle o
STA: 303+50-306+37 + ct
Ct U
o °
z
rt
s
O H
rtu
S
7.5'
TIE TO PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN PER 3.25' 1' 3.25' TIE TO PROPOSED
PLANS FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS
El
X2,5.1 13' PROPOSED BANKFULL c
1 25:1
E
EA m W U P
U O
RRCIRnun P.RAnF N 5 U Cr)1-1
1
•
UT2 Reach 2 C7 In line Pool J
STA: 303+50-306+37 P2
w
12 X m m
v a 1
o a oq n
J

/ V 1
cA
Q
Zoo
- 6.6' - t 1- t �z�
H▪W
1.5' -- 3.6' -- 1.5' TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
:1 \\\ 3:1
PROPOSED BANKFULL
\_
PROPOSED GRADE ^��
-4/
y
UT2 Reach 3-Riffle
STA: 306+37-312+06
- 9.6' -
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
- 5.4' --- 1.5' --- 2.7' -
cf)
0
ct
Ct U
PROPOSED BANKFULL bA
3.1 1.8' y5.y +� Cr)o
z
H
PROPOSED GRADE CJ)
U
UT2 Reach 3-Meander Pool m
STA: 306+37-312+06 S
- 9.6' -
- 4' -- 1.6' -- 4' -
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
1.6' PROPOSED BANKFULL
.Sp1PE
ci 25p:1
E PROPOSED GRADE
m w u m
g,u N
•
UT2 Reach 3 In line Pool
Cr)
STA: 306+37-312+06 w
w
X m E
z q a 1
^ o _a o n
J

/ V 1
z �
�o
!U�w
8.4' - Qz
_ H
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS 2.8 2.8 2.8
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS
0.8'
3S1 35:1
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
UT2 Reach 4-Riffle
STA:312+06-317+28
cn
.�
O
O
ct
U
11' •
Cll Cr)
5.4' -- 2' -_ 3.6'
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS ('V
TIE TO PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN PER PLANS .�
c
PROPOSED BANKFULL E
cn
3,1 1.8' Z 1 4
PROPOSED GRADE
UT2 Reach 4-Meander Pool
STA: 312+06-317+28
EA
E
m W U
2 N Q x Q r^
o ` •
o
E m m
C' z E. O q

/ V 1
a
�t '!
3.5' — Qz ,
I-�Z
HW
TIE TO PROPOSED 1.25' —1' —1.25' TIE TO PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN PER FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS PLANS
0.5'
\\\ 2:1
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
Old Bus Branch-Riffle
STA: 260+00-261+77
•
cn
o
O
ct
� U
re
0 ,71
4'
O 0 H
U
TIE TO PROPOSED 2 2 E�TIE TO PROPOSED E 6
FLOODPLAIN PER FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS PLANS .,�
1'
2.1 1 PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
Old Bus Branch-In-line Pool
STA: 260+00-261+77
m W U P
N Q UT, Q 1 .1
N o •
o
w �J
A E m
x` ^ ' E.O U Uri

/ V 1
Q
Zoo
t '' '!z
— 4.3' z o
Q6 °J �
h Z d H•1
TIE TO PROPOSED ~'w
FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS 1.5' 1.3' 1.5' TIE TO PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS
0.5'
31
3:1
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
Barn Branch-Riffle
STA:280+00-282+91
co
— 6' Cn
.r,
0
O ;..,
ct
ft
TIE TO PROPOSED 3.6 2.4 TIE TO PROPOSED U
FLOODPLAIN PER FLOODPLAIN PER
PLANS PLANS
z � �
1.2'
3r1 1.:1 PROPOSED BANKFULL ft
PROPOSED GRADE
ft U
Barn Branch-Meander Pool m 6
STA: 280+00-282+91
x
— 6' ►
TIE TO PROPOSED TIE TO PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN PER
FLOODPLAIN PER — 3' ►— 3'
PLANS PLANS
..._...._...._...._....T...._...._...._....
PE
S;1 1'}2• 25:1 PROPOSED BANKFULL
E
PROPOSED GRADE EA ro w u O
g, u 1-1
•
Barn Branch-In-line Pool
A uJ
STA: 280+00-282+91 P2
w
X m m
_
o a o n
J

1130
1130
0' 2' 4' 6'
wearicnLl Cq
0' 20' 40' 60' z 0 m
�N[7i
(HORIZONTAL)
q� �zo
EXISTING GROUND �V ,
HW
1125 1125
r PROPOSED BANKFULL
1 o CO
O+l 0 CO 0 CO O
O p +' — O
1.5
¢ II ¢ I I
'6o w w ••,-2.0%•~i,w > I ¢ 'I II '-' o `� o `� a o
I > II \\
— II
ri.. I W t~/1-W Vl J II
1120 o r`.,^•• I w 1 w / >. 1120
rl 0 ri + CO Lf1
o-ti o
t~/1 W \ I II II • 'N'N'�.•,N•N•..�... W O CO O
-1.1% / CW �� ~_w ~ w II- II- I m' ,�..... ti�
II
W W N W N W II II
7% dJ w > >
\` I -2.1% N N
1115 1115
PROPOSED GRADE
0 O
ct
1110 1110 �.y
99+65 100+00 100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00
, i_ •✓,,till , ----- --------
:w, K �• u X cI
6
-- i ---� i• ,rl it __
'1 DUKE
J I j; I EASEYjENWER'J = I a
2S , d` �--X STA:103+43 r , ,
STA:100+37 . -_II; x , X�X�X X NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK I (� U i-;
` NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
�X� INTERNAL CROSSING —
'� BEGIN REACHI-RESTORATION ,.5.' I fie�X-'-�X - ____ �X
---- ----- ----- - - STA:103+10 __ _- ---- -_
' of?,;.r - _"_NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK _
jy5 ) ;,'i +� ___-- INTERNAL CROSSING - -_---- ------11
or
}• a ="'� — — is;>Siiij 5ii�►�lfriih "':-1120 s rii r� 3i r S r I
�Zir�rr r�Smp' 11•y0/,_ _ lilt ll�lf ,l - f_ rill
r sue` <sr•;, ZOy+ �ii 1
:0• !i �4` _ /. �`
1 l`
- — —
•
,94 --- --- ••
-�. —�_ Sheet Index
tiV
12 'kYs�or- v��4`l���a' -
O ♦ ® • ',, / ' f� llslll 91 If&llry 1 p221=1-= r `ts! -_-' , *PA.
°ram J
I
c
REMOVE EXI [i4'�'•.>. — Su o�Ji.
STING 4"CPP / ryji^�ryiii •fi �; •I►- c2. .2
o ,
%C �•. ycrrS' O111111:1111.1' 2 E
FzECE CE � �2.2 Mal
tvgim
E E
`�2.2 5CE
2.1.5
1-1
l�, 2.1.4
- - - 2.3.4
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING !EK
s
O l •
1-1
_ - ---- __ exunt 2.3 3
.1.3 o
U U
------ ------- - - - C �t111,itt\
o
N
_
x = - -- _ -
1130 ------ _ -
.7
,S E

C 1125 1125 V
0' 2' 4' 6'
EL (VERTICAL) Cq
EXISTING GROUND Q
0' 20' 40' 60' Z m
��z �
�4(HORIZONTAL)
W )U w
t :1
0
+ + FZ I�F ;�
1120 N-,_ o ti o`� La -PROPOSED BAN KFULL 0- ^-4 +-� 1120
11\ I--� \ N w � v~i w w \\ ~ w
LU
... �...._...._...._...._.,+ m o m \ w I- \N-ice J J i'LU / \\
�...._...._.l 1 _
m o 0 0
.ti `� ti `� . _.. .: O - m
2.1% UJ u, 1
v~ w v~ w u u
1.8% I Q u a II 1 IZlY
1115 - rl w w 111/I1E
1110 1110
a)
c
O
1105 1105 .4 up
104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 107+80 O „i
i
OI
O •
_
v"iih�i. /
�v~i •NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK �` o'' (I !/ m G7
•{r:��>:aiii`i?ice:..,. �' Q
gig•:$ r: Z.��..Z;.� •
+�
•
I ! 3ii.:!i.••• ..._•2:: it . 1
•
=I r;1 s%I? 105+00 ;t;* : -=c-_--- �� �� i!\w1 III •i, /�
U 3riAPpik• i REMOVE EXISTING 12"PVC ; i!*.)\: V
•••1.1 \ ,fie k -- - ------ - ai,••.-X o�koo y • �_- • �,-. !, , /
E_= • ••� __ •
• 1 ice__--- 4 �\1,t1', �.
•1•• •_• \`i� � Sheet Index
_ -_ •
1111
•
-li
pb�--- / - "1115 t--' •--• .0 49, _ ._ '\==?11•S-,_ _ ;•,',,,'-,,,< •:;.:(o ,•t i 2.2.2
N / 1 _ - _ _ -
SE
_ T �' •s '/ •--i '- * 1115:._ ` I _ '�-- - -- - 7 `__
_1120-
�.2 5
•
2.1.5 2.1.`` 2.1.4
,
x2.1.3 ,, 3.4-} °CYeek'�; l nt ro iti2.3.3 Ii
�`te 2.6.1 �a,
•I CE �CE '2.5.1 W NCEI � CE CE -CE j_CE: CE ����2.4.1 mEC
CE� N�CE�CE CE�
D9�x \ ' T 2.3.1 o z o o

C 1125 1125 V
0' 2' 4' 6'
z (VERTICAL) Cq
2 Q
0' 20' 40' 60' z m
ry�m
�4(HORIZONTAL) t ' '`I , L 'w
� o
EXISTING GROUND N
In 26 1 L'
—PROPOSED BANKFULL w o `'
1120 1120
m a) lD m O
N lD N lD
W •m m m
,O O ,ti O m
1-0 O
11
LU v¢~ w „ IINCB 1 ¢
...I�... .i N W N W
rl
O0�....O.0 �....�....�....�_ W._l, O.lD \ '.'''
1115 1\^ r, ti o,.o...�....,o o.�...._. -0.5% \�1,-,r„I /- �`N-- _�/ 1115 '/N' J
\ w w -2.0% 1- w
1110 1110
PROPOSED GRADE
a)
c
TID
1105 1105 +r bfJ
107+80 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112+30 0
o6, ;"/-'''-';i2 , / Imo; _ 6
/2, ^ \
x e
"1 0
y/
n
O I , 1,,, ,-z. u; 11 \a��� b / 'se,/
z�0 cJ) ~-1
�I __c Z him �y r , ,
----/ y �J
' NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK o cr)
lu 1 m 1,,�;; z
U r RETAIN EXISTING BRIDGE .i00 Qp!`•�' '�i�. a i
AND ABUTMENTS �y,.,4o. \�i•'v':•s+.!t..�;.
I ;k1 , o
n _ STA'108+52 n y� "�
' )/ r ti ,cam" NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK i �_-- --- \` �!;J _ y;-::7\-'- 112+0=_
ti k INTERNAL CROSSING I - �i-'------- -----_�':Ij:_;�=_- 1
Al";
44
♦ •• r e e e\ - _ i /tl i y_1�_♦_ A ..l. = Sheet Index
I?i1,
i
;�3 NV;o•••I --1115
., ��Y•�o.ram«a. �`' 0 �C— �r. .�r� tI
a-oQ,•,1la•Y��.y,Q•SYr•!1i•.' j ,m- y".. \ it -1
r4'. II� •`r _ �•'•'•Y 1,01,t�Ya3al`s-a',.__ 1p9 •+' _‘g7 _ - _ -- -- _1^o _ < 111+ 0_,% _- -- r2
n1�1 - -a6ypv 3D ate` _ _ , �i''i•.r-.1---.'-- '.,,,i,11 1Eiir,..„-1.5-40,.4111.„0....i....._. 4a.-,..- .op,'..,„...p„.;1_„ .---',ko' -•, 9.v•
_1115-_- '_• -- N\{ s i r- '�'adl•1� _ 4 mow-___,_-__ zu __ -,; - _ - _ - i- ll k
2.2.3
_ 4-•
1
r
E r 'l 1 I l ��' 1 m ,ZZSc>ii --. m ----------------------- - `\,�‘_: --;_-- -- � � __" _ "___= i j�1-,)
.1. !� 2.1.4 V 2.1.5
T
I x r' ; // 1! ,\l - - ---- -- _ ------ =-•�"•�ii ---- "1110• a's_---I W 2.1.1 2 ry�'-/�`� ro u O
STA:107+92 ` •r ,'--' -- - _ �s `J: -_- 2 ¢x u
El
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK �- ' `\\;` '- _ ,,__- a_'-=__,u';-, - 115 I 7 ��' ,ve k tir t' •
,P INTERNAL CROSSING „ v` - CE C ��n t�/2.3.3 Ii
�F.' O' , f?(rE .i / 1 i 1 k - --- m CE - CE CE —��CE C - CE _ —�—CE --- - _ ol011•ttt�ex 2.6.1���Ir��' 1
,� STA:107+87 CE -CE- CE—CE ---
t ;1�" 1U� ��� 2.5. m
' NORTH. LITTLE HUNTING CREEK — CE ii y Q� 2.3. L`,`2.4.1 I
_ V
I,-; END REACH 1-RESTORATION 1 , �;�'I'(���% ti N ;v mti
BEGIN REACH 2-RESTORATION '?' - I � 3
x ---- I i UTI CONFLUENCE 2.3.1 0 o` u
r / , i n

c 1120 1120 V
0' 2' 4' 6'
)21
(VERTICAL) (�
P.
-PROPOSED BAN KFULL Q
0' 20' 40' 60' z 0 m
EXISTING GROUND o
(HORIZONTAL) U
+ N
t �
�_o �_o ER-2 mio 0
Q\w II II , N O6 N I�HW PH,_1
1115 `n Q-� _ ----__`\ ¢_j `-'_- `-'_ti m vI 1115
N N n N
W\ \ Q II Q II } O
\\ V_W
Lt
CO CO
/ ' t' --•- v+It:o.._....y... 1 \.../._...._...._..,v� o-II II I � o Ow I I Q II i i,-I ,-I \ I1 1- w 1- w I ! .0`^ \'1 % ' `^ w I.,
..._....�
I I Q II Q_II
2.4% N W VI W I II '-'
1110illk W w �� - 2 3/ .:( w 1110
I I I w
N. �i I I
NJ
1105 1105
PROPOSED GRADE
co
0 O --
O
1100 1100 +� bfJ
112+30 112+50 113+00 113+50 114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+30 O
T'•
2 f
O CI)
_ z
::�....yi,t:2�1i: -- REMOVE-EX-1ST-IN-6 EXISTING
' �`e.4 ,•`::s:. -------- R FENCE VW33 bW3 b l0~
':�z4.•*!:1", = --------- b1N.33- ---- ---- WITHIN EASEMENT -- ------ c-I
` �*Z�!�" VW3j� W3j��b �VW3j VW33/ GV•.` win(aa� cI
�.gi�p,, __ STA:115+75 Q
%��'i:� --- NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK _-1115------_ H
— --________-� ., NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK ,<o)+�.e�z'' UT2cONFLUENCE - I ,
•�. p���; --- -------- y,���L - _115+ X-�`'�i\ig X _ ------X X- z=�
1.
� ` / Sheet Index 1
�' _---_-- _ _�` �`r`.17=:,1�'�` - -=____s1110=_=--=='_i' =_::';41 �04 - -= _ ____*rc: ���1/j al .----------I''----:
---_-_ i
\,'Hl„ems s" ---- ��*��_____ 1p':.� — — -_ —�"-;� i�+ter --�1----- `�_=='"-`^;;,;r ��.JB'�', •` �
cc,,,," „ `r=4• -- ��;�L" '��aiD0 '-_ -+ ==- - `,\ Nit rie • I ir2.2.3
� -2,^` _ - Ti ,� _``` •tea`-%y2=�c,=_"_ �r0��.�. '�.
W' iç
�� -• .-313 �iinr'X;'•• _ �`'2c
11 h--------->.•! �.'J'f- \6 !�2 5 2.1.4 2.1.5
..,r_�. _� .�::. Jerry /•
i' xpp 2.1.2
�`= CE-CE� •''.f�s:o.� �': .:: .�r', • /� _ _ -1 2.1.1 A��/������ m w u m
• tnt (
3 t\exu
•
Iic' r��j i : •>ps: *:n���S:w'>' / 1� t- , 2.6.1 ��,d --_ p241 " NIS I I• o z oOF i i\x

f 1120 1120 V
0' 2' 4' 6'
z (VERTICAL) ci)
2 Q
0' 20' 40' 60' Z 0II
m
Z gqEXISTING GROUND Go
HW
1115 io r, 1115
+ 6 PROPOSED BANKFULL O
• o
—_ 0
Q II + W _ II W-N > O O
O O- o Ln
o-o
`' `' +
o 0 a re,+ oo o m o
_ oo oo
1 V1 =_/ N J II II II ri ri
w' u� I- w `-
J Q II
-....".•••-. 1 I 'I-9
m m m _ H > Q II Q II
LIJ
.� ..�....�. _� O to W to W
'O '� O O.S� O O O `i
LU
1110 I II-`i II-`i ..\�°� +,moo -0.0%W _w 1110
1 1 Q II Q II - N ` - L/��
~ W ~ W II `/
1 1 Vl tfl, II \ II •
y
-2.0% w L" I-tfl w a
I \ L., W
STA=116+30 -17% W �__`--J,w\
ELEV= 1106.20 I \fO.2%,'1.2%
I /________________7>
11051 0.3% 1105
PROPOSED GRADE
a)
c
O
1100 1100 +/ b!J
116+30 116+50 117+00 117+50 118+00 118+50 119+00 O .5 ,,..t
Ii- - ,1�2p- --- - ---- - - '7
•
k
a
O- ----- - �
— �- ---- - ---�
cs,
-
-
+,
Zip -VIADA___ REMOVE EXISTING FENCE_ 3� - ,- 1 4+ ,s
-`�I WITHIN EASEMENT ,_ :'- 1 t,
___---_______----___ STA:118+80 `
RTH LITTLE HUNTING
Q _ - 1115----- J ,2-
--'-- ___________I
-- ENOD REACH 2 RESTO RESTORATION
CREEK
__Hi-- —_ -
_ ' / •-.... - e v..4.i.0,,,,,\—
_. _. _...._...._...._ =: - —_ -_ Sheet Index
U=r u_ 110 i •• _ ' �•i.• '•1?sx� = 94 --.-2-_-._-,-.2-,- -:-,'7',-,%__-,''-,',-,----,.\._e-4-_4_,_e
_.H ,r &Ili _ - ••••••terc: 0 -�✓ '` - 118+ , -_
L
r -- -74----,' :" ..7 :di'"-iiiiitOr -"••••-' ':'',_ ,'-'- ---------'---------------:.‘., " / - PI
_ 2. 2
�`-[='- / •••••' - if,• ,�g=_"__ --_ _ — 18"CMP t�a I••U•• ,n'„ ;`5, a1110.- __` - 'r-x=�.�•• i i INV IN UNKNOWN 1,�•17•1i • �, f I INV OUT 1108.28'
.�CE 2.1.211 2.1.4 2.1.5
�'// CE CE x,;' 115 K� -_EEPAA- 2.1.1 A��=���
__-----
-_"__ -_------ ---_- _ try�T/- m.'
' ' DRAIN TILES WITHIN THE j1� i A�"'----- -�~�� 2. ��Q x Q�FE� _ -- 2.3.4
--- CE CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT WILL BE ;11 --__ _ -�'r �t�r°oCYeek♦v��3 o J
EXCAVATED. IF THE DRAIN TILES ___ - t\eY1
----- /` CE�CE EXTEND BEYOND THE CONSERVATION I Is) _ N0-0,-`tint2.6.1 il�� Au Au Au Au vk CE ----_ EASEMENT,AN EPHEMERAL POOL WILL x _, %;I,' ����!'2'S.1 W /�•
- BE PLACED AT THE OUTLET OF THE ,, ) _ 2.3. L`,`2.4.1 V
s I '�` iu uL uL uL uL uL uL Au________„ DRAIN TILES WITHIN THE EASEMENT TO = _ / ,�� __- _____ �v ;v E � m
x Au Au Au '�CE�uIs���I,E f/' CAPTURE AND STILL THE FLOW. 'I' i ',%�'7 i 2.3.1 z y x
/ o 0/i s
O

1175 1175 v
0' 2' 4' 6'
z
a r EXISTING GROUND (VERTICAL)
+ + P
0o , Oo „ ,n o 0' 20' 40' 60' Z O �m
N N ,y W W D p rr
STA=200+00 ¢-II , II O-II 0 � o-0 re) /\ (HORIZONTAL)
m"�� o
„>, ^I oN r1.,, STA=201+47 "'
ELEV= 1170.10 `r '~^ II II ti io - \ '"�w o
t w ¢ " ¢ " O w O ELEV= 1165.00 I z
\ w `^ w ¢ II II m o STA=201+62 ❑ �"
\ 1— >+ a¢ > . ELEV= 1164.13
N W
1170 •
d'po \ I'\-.„ W� �N W `� J 1170
I II II + / _STA=201+77 z
/!\ ¢ II ¢ II o / ELEV= 1163.26
,_ > 1- > N ti m',o' I
•�_ I _ `� `� II `+° r� I STA=201+92
\I w w N_> `m° � m \\-ELEV= 1162.39
1 w3.S o�' -1.8%. II + N I _STA=202+07
_ '� / W ¢ I I W
•��•••.� / NJ oN ti 'Im .-I ELEV= 1161.51
- 3.4 o J\\ \ W II 'm '^. _STA=202+22
, \•.• ¢ O ELEV= 1160.89
N y �T
-./
\_ \r N III V � O-Irv,-I� `7,
STA=200+36 STA=200+74 \ 'moo v •'\ ¢ II O
ELEV= 1166.55 ELEV= 1165.77 .. • W wLi lax III ra o , o ± • + 6
1165 - II O o + • + -PROPOSED BANKFULL
w'\ Q-w ^I-.� al
^I-.�—^I-v, ^I v, o� o� 1165
N II II O O ./�/`�/`1
\, ¢ II ¢ II
N ., N ., + 1
In
PROPOSED GRADE '•\ I w 1-1-1N 1.1.1 ,~ii II II �+,, II II o o o
W w +
I 1— > O .-i—N_W N_�I N_�I ,r.�
STA=201+43 I w ¢ II w ¢ ¢ O ti
ELEV= 1163.80 • I //l\ „>, N N
\ v W W W I-.>
STA=201+58 \ _ J J J
ELEV= 101+58 ----/ \\----- --- I,
STA=201+73 -34%
ELEV= 1162.05 -3.2%
1160 STA=201+88 -32 0 1160
ELEV= 1161.19
STA=202+03 3.1
ELEV= 1160.31 STA=202+49 STA=202+83 -36%
ELEV= 1159.60 ELEV= 1159.12
STA=202+18
ELEV= 1159.44 '-i
STA=203+74 " R•-I
ELEV= 1157.810
1155 1155 I _.
200+00 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00 O
+ter. ----
S = !�w� „ ft
_" - 170E .�
------"REMOVE EXISTING PIPE _ -----' - '-' -- --- --
ft
•
- i i `, ,\ 1 -- i E E CE can)
' � 11 C'E—
i/C -� — CE '=CE v `__ ,.CE =S,''�E r G C _ +�
C CE STA:202+24 _
STA:200+27 :,%,�+ ,i:%�-- _ �,
d I UT1 �'�" _ �:�'%% ;. i END TYPICAL A _--_
, v i \ __= `•j - '''2; --r BEGIN TYPICAL B ------
END TYPICAL A --'
',-,` /, \,\\„ BEGIN L B sr _ STA:201+20 - _\,, �- \--� ,i, - - ---
G TYPICAL
\ UT1 - • �'�� `I' 2.''``;``PIPE 1 r foos: ice _ �1 = I
` �,, `r END TYPICAL B -_, 1 =
,`-.�, r ' BEGIN TYPICAL A -- • 'REMOVE EXISTING PIPE, 4 _ - _1165- fit---- ---'- I
, ''' -----1\TsP • '2,00 7: ".; ',. ', / ,,,...,-, ,, \ \ r--,,, ,ierAg, to,
•
STA:200+00 ` ,kr' C\ I ,�� 101 ,w.'��`? �.'• i ,w. ,w. ,w. ,w.• j0 ,w. ,w. ,w. •6•ri N�.
,'i' - - �� li' .(!,, , �' ,As ,As Is ,r..vv .. ,As ,As ,As ,As i.110 '4' , /�/ •\ Sheet Index
BEGIN REACH 1-RESTORATION I'?'1,`, !��\,,• .� r.�`0f� •�,• r �.• �l�1, 1
BEGIN TYPICAL A �`11 \ v . i' ''•�; - �,jy •i•v IO 2.2.1
Y
ilks;:ks_AL,_;:s As
` 1 `?,�` ^--- _ - it �'ry \`-_�" -1165-__ - , iT ' ' c
ir .,
, ,
,„ , ,„
,„,,,,„ ,.. ,..,
, __ ,_
\ „ , ,
„,2.2.3
Fd
24
�
,``. `�',i ' ` r, 3D IJ�3D.„ 3i� 2-7 ,'3, 3D �'•, z 011.1t2.5c•
� 'N. �/ , �, -'i 1 r ;I7 =~ 2.1.4 2.1.5
\\ `� •
_ - - - Q\ Creek gri2.3.3
�� r�, I xwntir� ' o ^'�\ `� S , - r �, I �`ot �'{'2.5.1 m •
,
2.
I'-,
x `� Two S �0., _ -- I �2.3.1 O. o` u

C 1165 1165 v
0' 2' 4' 6'
z
om 1m3 / _
._
\— -—J
(VERTICAL)r, EXISTING GROUND
'2 - N
-� ^ rm 0 20 40 60 I�
ZZ'
oo , m000 , + n W N ZZ Nz
11 oOQ O ` � (HORIZONTAL)
0-,l,-N _�p-> _ .a_> _ ,� � W N- II. NWa > - 0 -Q-II.--O' k _ ,.,-I--0u,ry- ---a1,1- _, n ,W QI - ---V- - N H > II .iOl W W N , D Cr)
W ,, fl nV °
1.0- II- V_J Q_.4 vi ,n—II 2 ii1 . m _m F a
Q I W 1— W0 NON ¢ I N OI, o ,
N —PROPOSED BANKFULLW w v, N N W ,, , ❑ ;
N r/, W N W nW H .
W II 1.0 Q II Q 11 I � � � � + W1160 W Q II Q IIW ~_w _w, , _ �_ m STA=207+33 1160
,i c.r, \ II o , , \v, w v w w Q Q ` o m ti ELEV 1153.46 ------' / z
_... _ _...`� .. w \-
-1.~40 \ •�.� • rn rnrn =
D DI I 20 .. \ V N aII H w � NtiOti
•
O O-� +- —+-M �
iM �N I,\ W WN N r NW O N O N
II Q I
\ WQ 11 `^ IIwN y IN y M
M-� �_�_0-� N ON\ > _1 c.r, Q II—Q-II— w, ra ' �- +-• ... _ \ N w vH wvH wON rVi ON N ¢II II N rrl
^ o re,II o
w N ti + m
1 -3 // II \^S — aII Q II W Hw~ w ~ wv v `n 1— w`n N .-
QII
O
O_
STA=204+46 '?.>% •-1�' 1 w w ~_w ^I 1 \� ,i �
ELEV 1156.57 I 1 w II
1155 , 1 ` % N-w
1155
/, -1.2%•L•' `•_
STA=205+61 � � \ / 'Z 6%
ELEV= 1155.15 /
STA=206+06 1 / / _
ELEV= 1154.51 1 •1 .......
STA=206+35 •'•- •.
—PROPOSED GRADE \ // �35% —
ELEV= 1153.92
STA=206+78
ELEV= 1153.34 STA=207+20
1 ELEV= 1152.89
STA=206+89
ELEV= 1153.34 STA=207+95
1150 ELEV= 1151.83 1150
a)
c
•r•-I
C
O ,.,.,
ct
CD
ft bD U O
1145 1145 -
204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00 208+50 O ,.a
0 - %'rrl ;„r 00
-" - _ -1160 C -Jr 'r `ice - --' ,_-__- ,�� ��I N }ram., C!')
cn
= ,:/- - '- ,1rCE�''1-yCET— E -`C.E✓ _--CE. '''ice 'E .;;\ • < ,' , %'
'i— _ -'' UT1 -:s ' ^ = cr,e,T'I -�c s_ ' e€_ '`ce ,e� I �--
it ' �. ,
' r „,,`11SS,_� / _ EXISTING 24"HDPE PIPES TO
..0/%%:%;iiC� ' '', ;' _ --.� — BE REMOVED hr-
diiiy�; '
i
_ �G1ii ' ., ';:' '*•,•9�ii:' ::•/4,-- •-. 1ii�,yti� Sheet Index
, if
- — �� ���I/' ,ti�'Jv;l `� - ��•� �\d .�i7i" = Q• i�!� /��\' A{ ! I ,1 2.2.1
— � .\`; •if. ,'`0',:c.� o _''•,, • _1155 71r - :-'••• W% ' ;.*4#i ••4��0 I y?
.`s;'d /j\'cos{oo-.; - :_ _
•t • / ' , - - EXISTING FA ROAD TO-- -•- --— �2.2.3
-------""---- ----' i BE REMOVED ,116 _" � �L4 4
,
_
-- '-- al .-. 111111r11111°1.0"13..3
--- 'zI% - 5 2.1.4 2
- 2.1.2
.411)1.11-111101(1.111"140"1'Il1klti
1' 3'J ----1160- - __-" 3. N•
__ _----- __- --- --- CYeek�` 2.3.4 N
3J r o
_ 3J 3J
3J 31�
u
30 - -3J- 3 � _ _ - - _ 01�"itt\e 4±. 3
__ = 4.1 N
_
11
I _----_- --- '__--- .1 _ o
_
_
_

/ V 1
1160 / \ 1160 0' 2' 4' 6'
' —1 --/ AV (VERTICAL)
P.
,� �f-\ --- � EXISTING GROUND 0' 20' 40' 60' 0o
z s2
0, o 1_ ' PROPOSED BANKFULL 1����� �/� y/ \\ --\ // �\ (HORIZONTAL) Alb) � 2v,
00
N `-' ON , CO 0 , N O O ,J — — \\\ F-I Z 7 d ii
+ + \ HW
t~/I LU Q Q II 0 0 N IN '‘I
W Vl H > rV ri N ri
1155 w N-w Q-II 1 II o , ry o-�cri-o+ N N 1 1155
N , co N , O 1
t~/1 W VI W II + m II •ri O of O ,r O
D N r,
W W I— > O_N.-Q_—II rV .y +-p� �+ W 1
t~/1 11 `-'N Q II to I, II 1
W Q II W t~/1 W + D1 Q II N .-I N .-I ,r to \
Vl LU LU .-I Q-II to olQ II + I,
Ill N '-'-' ~ w n ~ w O ti \
11 N W O N N L N ri .-I N �`�
1 W N-rIWQ-II `-+'-� 1 ^\/7`.
H W N
• • 1.4% Q II N N
•2.5 N J w a r, co
3-.qo Lu JN to I- w `-' ti 1
O to LU N
1150 '3.2%' —"' II II a to 1I 1150
_ Q
2.6° ' �•. - m w� ,STA= 08+86 0 lf, - `-'
aII Dw `-I a o
•• 1 o-vlELEV= 1150.52 I +ti ,STA=209+37 tfl „U` N ,,. t,
t/1 W II
\ELEV= 1149.80 Q_I 4 „ t/ w . ti .1 �\` _ II• ~ N r QI N
N
\• II lfl lfl 1- W ri N \
W Q .-+i N N ,r
�. N-,>,-, .-I-ram,—W II- —0-ri O ri
N rl Q II '\ O N ri
PROPOSED GRADE 1- ,>,-, rl-m—w k N .-I ru rl
STA=210+97 �. t^ .� r,, m II II o, a 0 a
1145 ELEV= 1147.OSI � 91w ¢_ii + • \I- >_N > �I_m r`'.il_m.
STA=211+15 ` 1 w N \,-,-, w N N 1145
ELEV. 1146.01 • ¢ II \t Q II ¢ II
STA=211+32 'L.u` v~i w � N w N w rt
li
ELEV= 1144.97 • w "' N " (n �y
STA=211+50 .,` IL -- \�\i'�.N-+I-m_� ETDI
ELEV= 1143.93 N ., Q
STA=211+67 �• r ¢ > r� 1�
ELEV= 1142.89 • V ;
ISTA=211+85_ "620•-.;1%"'-
1140 ELEV= 1141.85 ••• 1140 'S"•1
STA=212+04 X
ELEV= 1140.68
STA=212+07 f
ELEV= 1140.68
STA=212+31_t y
ELEV= 1139.32 (P
1137 I 1 1137 Q
208+50 209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00 212+50 U i
7 Au
cn
to R ij Zr, m d m mOI i \ °" r
O • 1'1 ; i 'I
N r j j : ED
4"HDPE PIES TO • 1 E
- IN EASEMENT °11* NCE —CE� E ' II STA:211+10 ALE—CE '� -'„ � aai
_� N _ CE—d'CE—CE— UT1 '' ,�.1145��
`_W al BEGIN TYPICAL A •� 'STA:212+00 �i _
_z ��� END TYPICAL B �� '� �
�1 _r� -- rrr� p �� U 1 I /� 11
/=I/ 1155 � i I END TYPICAL A I,''I ' -
/-U /:...tip, ��-- —r—+—� ��� - BEGIN TYPICAL B 1 ` �14' "h ,iw.••,. h••• Sheet Index
Q %•%o y%;y'r.,� _ 1150 A� 1 j � 7?•m] fN 1
i ��....WY" �/ �M/dAr// 111 / / y� { 111 `�11y '1 ;,.'�• ,i1,. 2.2.1
!ii �c�� o _ "/r �' r��//M:rq ` - _ ,•
/ram!•I•_ z1 �, I
J1
••- .`,,•- !_•_- ' -__` `_ IL'•'' op. $. i ,'1`\ - 'J l;',-' F-�
�' •�A�. '`i ds - ��^,% - 1-3i, \`,`;1,';`'o\` i ir .,
12.2.3
---- -1160 :-__r- — — o iiii�- _ �'``, `\ ,\� 1145.-
nt—
Iklit .
160�
�s;,N
' ' \ \ \ s' /," rig f•l-\
I ________ 1SS �® -
2.1.2 2.1. 2.1.5
111111A In
—rQ' 1�ry�'� Ngt'A¢uO CO
EXISTING FARM ROAD TO ` x
--1165-- -- -- -- EASEMENT ��--_ (� 2.1.3 3 4
--_ - BE REMOVED IN EA EMEN - 1►-- Yeek��� '
3D 'i' ii!' tleKtvo-
3� u
•
1160
1 �¢
1 -_
D
�D 3- D'"��� � �150. � tbS'�t 1
_. ,251 /��
--_ ..n� ------ -'x .� _ ,J 2.3. 42.4.1 , V
o \ �v �z - ._�. N fi
s f __-_ 1. zss � z 3
x ZZ6's' II6.0. -- �--`. 2.3.1 0 o` u

I '1('
0' 2' 4' 6'
79
1145 O O I 1145 (VERTICAL)
+ +
`-I-.0,1 n-a ,N-I-� PROPOSED CULVERT I 0' 20' 40' 60' 0 o ,-.
N + CO `� 'i ti o a o SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.6 I \ lZ
II N
Q iN ti ¢ u m �,y c, N cnm 1—PROPOSED BAN KFU LL I (HORIZONTAL) Z 0'U
1—EXISTINGGROUND
V~1 II II N_W N ,+-^-+-^N-� LP)-m N 0.00
I \
L_ I
-01 Q I I m m N_c-I.—I_W N._c-1�11�—N_c-I N N / \II VI + m ci N M \
Q w II L.
II 0-1 oci ci /
1140 — ,�._JN_,y_N_J a,_N u. II / 1 1140
W Q ti▪ m ,-I o v., W / -
VI LU
----�2.1°p �� v~▪ w o n ¢ u ,,▪ N ti w m
I o • •• �` w o m w `^ m
0 ,
�� Ul W m N N N ci CO c-I
+ rrt + N II-ci cO cO
nr,
N cNi-� Q II ,Lto_, �
II ,_,
N ci ._,
N W �' ,-I Ol
1135 \\\\\ ,,
¢-> ¢-� ,,
—Q-II i�+o_N 1135
Vl VI N W N m 0
w y I m o
LU Q I I ± p
01 CO V N ,y
V + O N m
\-
PROPOSED GRADE .6'••
II II `,-I+° "1 �LU� ti
`Si•\••3.so Q N ci W II
•
H w
•6•0�• W I- w N w
STA=215+23 '60j• •\ W
ELEV= 1132.33
1130 STA=215+42 62 1130
0 \,
ELEV= 1131.62 •.
STA=215+65 STA=215+89_ Cr) •�y
ELEV= 1130.78 ELEV= 1129.85 O
STA=216+11
ELEV= 1129.01 •O
bl U O
O '0
1125 1125 Z
212+50 213+00 213+50 214+00 214+50 215+00 215+50 216+00 216+50 c6
i t\ r/
„Ly ,
S ifillit„...____
,,
C+.110E .., ..‘ ..., s
,, , , .▪ i 7 .g.,
/1 45,....,,
! ;/,‘,, \\-,,, , II if,,� , i� ' i SIN - L/�- —CE -CE 1, CEO UT1. o0'p I -11 /' '' ,o a\/'�. L'(= CE=-:-CE '_� EASEMPOwER� 35" / '_, 1 ul� ;:
ENTp- C ; m`• ,v.. i STA:214+33 _ 1140 ___-_ _--
MIIIIIII-
44!� • ///'`��'- BEGIN INTERN AL CROSSING % 0� •. - ,%� N��I ;1'„1 ----- t;-'Sr
•
•
v v tit r: \ : •• _ ra�-t
i i .•\:\ ,�,1D�` i •� I v is �'• i114 •• �%0♦4����r":.
_ • lea
r/�R_-- - _sue.
•
all
� -. �. _ 1,_ — — ''•'"`I.. " /- — u'` \`\\ �!`}:245+00 '•• •••'r z/ "'Yr- ' - - ,u.9 Sheet Index
1!�1 1145- , _ --- �\41i__a s ♦-♦ �'s" - — - 0, --- 1140 Ili 2.2.1
_____.,.,
r:L
I1 1 `• /� STA:214+84' `_--_- -- 1145-- --- E 2.2.2
PI
,viegnii
N1 vT-,♦.3 = END REACH 1-RESTORATION -- f \
2. N/ ��' 3J 3J —,�3.-----"\-, `-',���` BEGIN REACH 2-RESTORATION `� `a .,
��2.2.3
�.. `�^-i iu- ,3y'"-0• END INTERNAL CROSSING �w ' ` `( 2 2.4
.`mil•� T1As 1 ` I- ,v. ,v. ,v.... Zz O. _ PROPOSED CROSSING L'r-- '- /�! d,. 2 1,11
�'2.2.5 c
�/� 14S s9•` A. A. AU AU "�, SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.6 _ ._ /G� i ( !� 2.1.4 2.1.5
E 'Miv�_,w. ,w. A, A, AL w' p- , -"'` ),, Y. •,I 2.1.2 a
~ A. Dhr.A. ,Iy S>ii vb.A..'LA.. vw. AU • �\i --" ,- - - ;1'y��. `11, p 1` �'1P A 11 r �ry� `,,/ Q x Q 71.1
, •
� 1 - _tilw. Ai vw. vw. vw. vw. ;" "ws11 WOW_ _ i v �1 1, `1 I��rntir°o '1(4,2.3.3 /�
��`' ``ZZS ‘•
\\ 1\ ,-v'' ,w�_ .'- _� `•>� `� \ 1�°�011,ittle 2.6.1SII V
, �. 2.3. 11�I2.4.1
- •
O ur = 115� o a
x 3 1 '" x
r 1 J
2

/ V 1
0' 2' 4' 6'
,' 1135 I \ 1135
(VERTICAL) Cl)
N o Q
+-'^. •� 0' 20' 40' 60' Z ,o m Q II N\`o (HORIZONTAL) tai)< w `n 2 ,
v~i w + Z .'g f o m
^I ti i+o EXISTING GROUND i w o d H a
r`'cam - - - H
Q r,+ rN y
N II IN ,fl
I o N
N �N W N N E, ^
1130 ¢-II-J N-rI—+ ,, / 1130
t~/1 J\\ Q II N ,y /
H > II N / \
~ w r, m / \
`\ II II / I
Q ��j.
••`'• \ /-- ' J / I W `.
W ��
L. Q II N ri 0 0 O,f�l O .� 1
W II II N N + + 1125 \7/1125 • N -a_w-II-II.II-II-c_�.c_�_01�._^.co
•-•�'• l/ w N W Vl w H- w N m m W W
W W_Q II Q II N N + ri W
t~/1 W LA) W II II -�-� + p�
W W Q II Q II N N ! ri
H w H w II N , o In
m
N W N II
W-Q > II II O�+l N `f�I111W
N Q > N - N
cn
I., C./1
N
STA=217+08 "' ¢ > II- m o
ELEV= 1124.05 !t '..••.• I./1Lt., ¢ > `.-°I
r, N of PROPOSED BANKFULL
Z.g�o
� N ri
.• W
. N
\ / \ `qgo ;\ •` Q II II II
1120 \ \\ I / \.'4go \\\ a- v~i-"' VIw 1120
STA=218+05 \ I \ o / '•� I "' w ± ti
ELEV= 1120.48 - \ I =�% •`l \^I N ti-I
EXISTING CULVERT \\ `\• ?�°� I ¢ II
STA=218+28 � �"�
TO BE RETAINED 43 0 11 N w ,�
ELEV= 1119.88 \
STA=218+49 \ I �{•• o
ELEV= 1119.27 \ I ) /�\ / '�
STA=218+72_ \/ I --
I \'
ELEV= 1118.64 I I I I•••••. ,�rt O
STA=218+98 I J I 3 • a--, -I-i
ELEV= 1117.93 I I 3° b 'i
1115 STA=219+03 STA=219+42 STA=219+87 l/ 1115 Z ‘--'
ELEV= 1117.93 ELEV= 1116.70 ELEV=11115.42
STA=219+47 STA=219+92 --I
ELEV= 1116.70 ELEV= 1115.42
PROPOSED GRADE Cr) O
f U
Cf)
1110 1110
216+50 217+00 217+50 218+00 218+50 219+00 219+50 220+00 220+50 220+90
_,...1.1 440,„ - STA:217+28 o
�'� "" UT1 �,y STA:218+04 - - _ _ -y'r' 9 ' 'Aloe/•:.
EASEMENT BREAK L%y / y , UT1 _--- - / \��� tl I! I'4 S'II •
+,_-_ r. / m,-k IF ` \/' /�/ , , if,,'/;yyti: EASEMENTBREAK _ -- � -AI -` '-.\ *, �-_n",I( I�I��j,•�y=k ., • / STA::24.
0+21 c/-I' -- s ��R1•�.i •• �_ `�-` i '� • ENDUTIACH3 _ / /;�i�!�•� ' tl N
s-. ;-. .�, m -4*111 I tI :\\\-..11: RESTOATION \4F- -- /' I a-l:' . .**f• . .„,, 7
;'; • - - 4." ' - -- - /I r`s a® Sheet Index
�� - 4•• `i !� _=-- _ _ � "411114.i-efi. -g"� �,0/ 2.2.1 iji51iJ ,JI /
•• •
••IS• `� I-- END REACH 2-RESTORATION UT1 .\ ►., ...z- --- /-I- �(11
�=�2.2.5 c
E �a 30 A i• BEGIN REACH 3-RESTORATION ,T =�> / 2 1 2 j-, 2.1.4* 2.1.5
• �� �iwti� \ F _ ; ' '7`,0
Y i,�/�• �'% %• ;`I�S, '''I' 2.1.1 A�� r � "'
� REMOVEEXISTINGGRATEAND, ` 1 - ( ; W f���� /' "7 I; �` � � �3 4 ¢'x �i
REPLACE WITH HEADWALL\.•• h1_4 , ek •
'—W �` TIE EXISTING PIPES INTO O RETAIN EXISTING CULVERT' �% OCR•� j`, ,/� '' tir°o"'xe iVi2.3.3
• r o •
z PROPOSED WINGWALL —I PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT - J U��0 ;;// / �(;- ,tt\ex,An ^'JTd OF HEADWALL ANDENDWALL --- , �1�' ,y ., olt- 2.6.1Au /`�'��
-r''� SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.13 0 •
U��� �� i >�{ 2 a ' i fJ __ - -, - _ �--•` ?�1� ;,i ti 2.3. fie/�`2.4.1 _
s" .e� � � STA:217+40 z, J I Om \, as , • -•
z/J , i// �' E m
` �` 'STREAM ENTERS CULVERT` `I!I z 1
1 - _ ,J1b/> ' \ i 2.3.1 J

/ V 1
STATION ELEVATION DESCRIPTION 0' 4' 8' 12'
z 301+57 1174.51 BEGIN WORK
(VERTICAL) (n
301+63 1173.78 TAIL OF RIFFLE ^
301+66 1172.98 POOL 0' 20' 40' 60' 70 0 ro
1190 1190 301+70 1173.67 HEAD OF RIFFLE (HORIZONTAL) F-,Z 8 66 o
.,U w
301+83 1172.17 TAIL OF RIFFLE n
301+86 1171.37 POOL 2 z ' '
301+90 1172.17 HEAD OF RIFFLE Q Z 'g r5[-;.1
1185 -\�� 1185 301+99 1171.08 TAIL OF RIFFLE w `n
302+02 1170.28 POOL
\ 302+05 1171.08 HEAD OF RIFFLE
\ 302+14 1170.07 TAIL OF RIFFLE
302+17 1169.27 POOL
1180 1180 302+20 1170 HEAD OF RIFFLE
\- 302+27 1169.2 TAIL OF RIFFLE
-\ 302+31 1168.2 POOL
302+34 1169 HEAD OF RIFFLE
__ 302+41 1168.14 TAIL OF RIFFLE ��
1175 ---- 1175 302+44 1167.11 POOL YYY
/\
302+48 1167.91 HEAD OF RIFFLE •�1/)
•`69j- PROPOSED CULVERT 302+60 1166.41 TAIL OF RIFFLE
V SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.6 302+63 1165.46 POOL
PROPOSED BANKFULL 302+67 1166.26 HEAD OF RIFFLE
302+74 1165.37 TAIL OF RIFFLE
•�• _ -- 302+77 1164.3 POOL
•,' 302+81 1165.1 HEAD OF RIFFLE
•
\ 302+93 1163.54 TAIL OF RIFFLE
_
1165 83,4 \� 1165 302+99 1162.52 POOL
EXISTING GROUND
••••• 303+02 1163.32 HEAD OF RIFFLE
` EEE
1159 :L: :FF:E
1158.2 1159 rt
1160 A�k -\- 1160 303+63 1157.63 TAIL OF RIFFLE
%4 \�� \ 303+66 1156.83 POOL O Q
•�� 303+69 1157.63 HEAD OF RIFFLE 4 c
\t�,89% 303+79 1156.22 TAIL OF RIFFLE (t U
1155 \ ` •' 1155 303+82 1155.42 POOL •,-I .
\ �'•.. 303+85 1156.22 HEAD OF RIFFLE -I-)`
PROPOSED GRADE \\ 303+96 1154.67 TAIL OF RIFFLE C
\\ 304+00 1153.87 POOL E Z N
304+03 1154.67 HEAD OF RIFFLE ry
ft
1150 1150
300+00 300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00 302+50 303+00 303+50 304+00 304+20 ---,
o r , . o ct UC:f+i
/ i r r •r-I
I{
i
r
r
--- -1205 - V'
E 4"HDPE TO BE REPLACED' �/
r
_
/i � I'
H f / -r- '' r'
SEE DETAIL 2 S EET 6 6
i
a
-3/ 7
"----- -'_ -' JJ - -"-- -" _- - -- ,- �it
,
T
3�7-�'
� r
'
,
i'
- ---- --------'-- -- ------ -- -3a 3J -3,5 ,-STA:303+00'' �.'.••'•• ,y�y UT2 -i,'--
-- --_!�-_ .) ,BEGIN REACH 2-RESTORATION
- ----- - -----------------'--------"---------------------------- ----_----- ;��-' -', UT2 ' .-;
�_-='"/-119Q.--__ - ----'---___ --------__ __ --- '� - __ '�=��'" END REACH 1-ENHANCEMENT II - -= END INTERNAL CROSSING .!.�
---- --1190 �-11$`'.-_- - BEGIN INTERNAL CROSSING Sheet Index
=
��c3oo+o0,- FB--- -------- --- __- _- - _ .�114'�'
1 - -
5 "1
_
. ...,..`.` ,,,`` `. '', �, `, ! -'=--T: -- _ _ _ --- 1-;UT2 __ - .` ;;• ;_-__ _
,.:,_ ` � " - -y 'fit - --_ _ -'-I '''' 1[�
\?O` •.TyS.' STA:300+00 •�: +00 _ e2' __ __--' - -- --
2. 2
S'
' --- -- -- �- .�: E F~
•
.OS:; BEGIN REACH I-ENHANCEMENTII -_ ^, ,� ---_ - _ ,-___ itiiiii .,
-
PR
_ �` �'�M 2.2.3
�`;
!. 3p2+o _ 11'2.2.4
„
_ _ _ _ E T E CE i
CGlialt2.5
_ 2.1.5
lla
_'-r - _ - ----- ` 2.1.1 !! 4
Xill
BEGIN PFILERK _ - * t'J
' �' Q N 2.5.1 m
` w
�1- �
w_ l
/ry 2.3.I
x b h z
` = , A

Pi 0 11) 0 4' 6' 12'
IN La
•--1. ±
(VERTICAL)
E 0 ,
2 ,r La
0' 20' 40' 60'
4'z'
LO LLI
,_, LO 0
(HORIZONTAL)
w ± cr;
.1)
" ° 74 0 0
> OR , CO OR
(.0 1.1.1
_, ± ,.....:
Lu .< II '1'LO '1'
0 LO •0 c,d-ll 8
, 0 La LZ J g d H
.st . 1.11 LO Lo
n _,.1- I—I .
1155 I.7,-,...,
-L Lt .„
VI 1.1.1 0-'el N-,r- -> O_, 1
. 1155
IN CO
•
•. _,,, 1.1.1 On .1-
-,
VI
.... I—-> r0
•. _i '1' II_
. L.,.., <,-
I—
II- Lt1-Lr; LO-LLI ro
---.••. _i .,,, II '1'
1150 '
t .<
CN1 LO 1150
LO LI. IN IN I— > •-, CO CO r PROPOSED BANKFULL ra
.....:, .:,,_11 CO-CO—LO-1.1. -•-,—+- •
•--;--- LU I— > ± r.e.; II Lf-, .0 Lo• ,
STA=304+24 ...:-.--,
, Lit
I <C_II 04-el al_CNI
ELEV= 1151.76: ro , m m LO LI. „ LO CO
,-r,-',I- -,— -
STA=304+47 ..... N
, or,
1145 ELEV , 114E9L.1 ISE7VT2A S=T=A 131 I1=0 4438+0.624E4L_8E30 V S E= 1144E.L7ISE 6TV A==305+29 ...:95.-.6-,„1,.•S:"T,ALr 1,=wL3U0•5.+'1 15,1100/1 r.1-1:,:ot,-,,>'±L-.0:•
l-••••
•
''u•-.,oLo7•7C=.,o--t,,,-_.,0M,,-L_-,1.
T-I•__A.>1-L.1U=.,o,°Ca1'-1,,,-
•+VT 1A\=9
I:rot2p',+----.'64'r0r,>w0.na96•
1,
-LLor,I
'Luu•IL—rOO10t)p1--_00C‘>L_..OL,I,
--_'uor.V'..„o.p'.•1
-----
io0Ii
I.,i--Nn,,,'±L--,"L i,,II---a1•17C.+1.,00 C.,',---rr"..N0rIV--•-,,„oo•1I----LL,r,,>1_..a.4Iu o1,°r0r.11-I..t
y:1i"t0
•:'±1.,
/--p,r.•_,-.„r_-,1,-1 I
N2'I"•1i—
__—,•oora1--+oo,-.,__.
:
r‹1L7—r1C1
2r"iu—;:"ot•-,
1145
ELEV STA=305+03 — _, >- >- — — — —< - - —
1140 PROPOD ELEV _ - 0 _ 0 1140
STA=305+68 . , - -
1142.52 ELEV 1139.00 .,
STA=305+85
1135 ELEV= 1137.56 • •. 1135
I 38 ... I—STA=306+00 \ 6
ELEV= 1136.27 V 4.2% . -----
ELEV= 1134530%
1130
a)
.,--,
cn
.,--,
,—,
0
STA=306+69 ,,__./ --••••... 0 ;..i
ELEV= 1132.10
-\_ \_ •,--i
ft 112721 U ;4
STA=306+82 EXISTING GROUND STA=307+61 STA=308+38 \. - ELEV= . b,C o
1125
ELEV= 1131.74 1 1 1ELEV= 1129.62 ELEV= 1127.52 1125 •
1 -I-304+20 304+50 305+00 305+50 306+00 306+50 307+00 307+50 308+00 308+50
;6 7i
i / ----4--_, 30 1 1 I j I I I I :i I j , j , ,/ % ; j
' I I 1 : , I , I , 1 J I , j I ALL IIILLI AU AL 1 AU IIII Ai AL/AL A/Ai Ai,
• i , • ' ' I : ' : ' j / k.E, '
--Er %---- I -24------\„11. \ \ 1 ; I I 1 I ; 1 ' 1 ! • , I . / • C-4‘. E X r‘i
; 1-, .t.L AL /AL .4k ;AL AL ?IL 1 - AL JAL ,L,A_ ......4,. H ,--,
--- „ -' / , i , ; J , ' , •,l-
,i, ,,4 As Assn; ,, ,^-r <<, N , a)• • '1-••
' ' ', ; ; LOC' ; 1 I 1 L.r.,.j i i i I il / /AL 1.11%' 1111‘ AL-'1111i AL 1111L/1111L 1 111.4 + AL C;t1IL I AL\ ., ;•.1
'9011 '-' 11 ; 1 .71 ' 1 ' 1
I / '''''',' 7 i , ; ; - 1 ; , \
, ,
_- ,' --. , ; ; ; ; - , ; \ \ ,, ,
__ , , , , „ „ ,0 \ ,
_,..-1 ---------____ ,.., , i-i3,, ; , „ , 1 , \ , , , , ,,.. ,4 ,„,1 ,L1,L;,,„ ,L,,,,,„ ,.,L /,,..: ,L ,,„„," __,.41 0
- ----- -- , \ , , CE) i U CI)
• ,/ ',,,.; ; ', '1,/ \ \ ; i I , Ais As/ I '1,1 ) ,- ;-I AL AL r---, AIL Als 'ix• rt
• Li.) i ; i I ; \ nn 1, \ 1 ; As i As 'As •P•s / N., .., , 0 .. , ..,,, +-•
Cr)
',., '--- -,-,---. : ,-,.------. -------..,'' ,,.,-'' % i ; i ; i, \ \ ,, \ ; ,.f;" ' .,I Ai Ai' .," -/ • )1"4= ; Citl' -".'•0;"' E 6
LeW_Ii,wriii. '
--- / I i 453 ' \ \ \ `, i 't ,1 ,1 ,,,' rye, ,
., __„„
- ) 1 I , i • \ `, `, J ; \ : '' / ,/ f- .• , " , ,- 4) ,_
' ,,,' ,), / 1 i : ,
._ , i ,, , : ;‹, ,,,,,,,,•\
_ __
, ,,,,h ,,e A i II , AIIIL ' L
, ,
, ..-j ; ‘, \, ,,„, I Q1 'n ' n
: ', 1, Ann, / I ,•''' •AI, , ,8111 , c:,
, .
/\\ ‘'‘) \, \,, 1 A-it--,, . ----- , ,
„„------ , , , , ',D.— ; \ ; , , -.... , ,A. ,„ s,L .v,,,, ,L , x
i , , , , , , 4 "
, ,A4 ' • .4 4111111' „
: 1 ', ‘,2, ‘I ; i \', '''- • 6 /./
/ , I
, s'• '' ;/ / / ' /'''' 4:10.41 . \''''' ' 1 V i / .../.'//,/...___ .,,,,,--6.:::'"
; \ 1 s--I i ; I , \ Iss' ''' • ,\ -E'' /'
St1,-
%
,1,4',///,, ,s1 c:* ,.,egfzr ir-'''....'-*...I'L,,.., ,,. ,/'/". ,,,',:,//,''
EL / „-
7/...,_ ; 1 1 1 , - -- -"C.• gs" , , , ,
, , " '
I, Ce , I ; ; , , • ,, , ,.,„: : • • ,6,- <,,'/,,/,,//7,' „' :(, : L,_ Ni.,_./.._d ,Z,/,',' ,,,,•;45:,',/,/, „---- \-5-.--
, r\i/ /, ,, ---i-\. ___ ,'
.--- ,
------ , • ; 0,, , , , , , 1,,.. . -,r 4, i ,--• , ,,, „-; //1 l'. .. ' \‘‘‘)
j 1 '1/. / , 51' Ck, ' .!•''' / //'%//,e,''' ,// ,.,„,..x
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL ' •.„- , / / , ,•I
..,''' ,'''
/ rn / ,' ," \ ,' / 1 ,' / < )1 \ ---------- '''• '' iti',• 6.-.>-.. ,-,-- -- /,-',2,-- ,----
,' ,•
,, ,,,,c,,,,, // ,,, , I __,
tf.C.V,,, ,,, ,„/,,,/ ,/' ,/,/j„///'/AL 40. s:, - , de- •0 Al _ 7,--r.:.r.,..,.....,„, Sheet Index
_
---- ; , -, , ...-7_r_.1
, //,,' ,, ',',',,L,c') ; 4'1;11. c ..
, _ / /„.&.1„.s
(4/ / ,,, , /1- , ,, , ,, Ol ---- __.-----''.
'
- i 4.5/,•'' // '•'''/ " ' '''Ye2.••'' ''.''. •';,?.. A, 40-,4'. ------ ___ .-- ,-- .-
p 2.2.1
i 2.2.2
E. //X/''' L'' / '' '' ' '' / ,' Y--:li •-`1,*_ ---
,,,,,,,
,c2 31/4 i---., .--' i ,-• ,,/ ,,' , RIFLE TRIBUTARY COtikci UENCE , , `, -",-450":-',%" ' itr.,,,Mi ,„-- \..,'"
12.2.3
__„--- ,,,,-- ,,--- __,-- ...„---
--„ j'' END OLD BUS BRANCH
'0'412.2.4
-Ns L.-- E'
-111.,..
2.1.21 " Maii
t' ,/ //'9 / ,,/ -'' /As/As 46' As AA"'As ',1 As As',,,,40 As As As ."As• ,. ',, '`0,0,,Ars 4/As Ai ,---; ;;\4.1.11 -'..,-,,i ti„, \-. ,
,,A,' ,,/ ,,' ,,,' / ,,' ,,,,' ,,„,' ,,/ ., _ _ '', , , ,;-", „Li:*-='..,4,..,f,,,'' ,_-''. t-C-",--'‘; tetitit,%:/',--,..--_•7?.; `\\2----,k-d."----/- Enn`o;',2 5`o' E
E, ,/ ,i / i I ' / / f •-1
1 \
e
xxsvcs'On 3
.3
1 , ' hrfR8uTARy _ --___- __ , p - / - . „ 261 2.5.1 r
'TO •
.'.H.
L-E-
' z'h-A--b1t-Y L:1 A--L:'"A-s,i,IL l'•so ic:•4/";4)'",;I;;v14---i'Xi-,...0"'---(•-tz1-----,,e,-
..-t.-•1::14- ,-',-.L7.- ,;t'l,i-u,1.12..'i,:f2h:4,•4-iStt-,'i rhMt.g.-;ct-i..a;4Lg.:i:r="_15,,- •<.)„/,•/:,,,",-,,-'--"-—,----_:_:_ '__,' -• ', ‘-' / c-N / ,P- ,1 ,-/ „/ „" - .. -• -- / ,- ..„-- ,- -- -- ---.-„"--
23 lea
N
2140 N __
. .' E •E, •-b' t
1
.1 ., ../

/ V
I
Pi V_0 0' 2' 4' 6'
+
o ti m (VERTICAL)
m ,y co w ^
n. Q II 0 N lD H
0' 20' 40' 60' Z 0 �o 1 w m ,y o , N ^ i
L m ,y o CO
I II E-IWNwQ0 � -LIl (HORIZONTAL) Z-± ,),-; t �, U N
II m , - o co o N O !1r'
1130 w mio= N-LU Q-Nro 4—m4—�-� 1130 Q 5
a a + • —PROPOSED BANKFULL ll
oo ,' w ,r, W 0 .-1 0 .-1 0 , N W F-I Z `�.1
m .ti wQ-II
—Q-II—"-II
Q II H LO w H LO w Q w 0 ,) -H W
_I VI Ol LID On
•
10 I �•� I'� \\ m "' CO ti_m ,� a a—� LID EXISTING GROUND
Q II w w - -^-�
1 W II II + �/, �
1,1 s6 o I N�/ w LO w LO w m y (A\7
1125 / �) ,y w—11-II m-,y c-N-CO N 1125 ,�j•
6 ¢ ^
I A% j w ¢ 11 ,, m ', m a
STA=309+14 1 / -4•• I 1-') w 11 11 m ti //���
ELEV= 1124.76 ¢ ± •.° `-' .Ni
I / I I r'j•.;3.pj'�\ `~"-J-'^-J v~i w .+, u,
STA=309+41 1 / I I I.*"... -- 1i' 1i' VI a tiELEV= 1123.95 1 / II 1 I V.so • "'' :'-1 m
N co
~ wN oI—__r I I ,� v, LO
J •S% a 1w w '-'-' m---STA=310+09 I LO
ELEV= 1121.92IN✓ W Q 11 CO CO co
1120 _410 ' v~i-J gl 71,' m-�- 1120
STA=310+50
ELEV= 1120.64 's,.,o ��---- w 11 11
%
PROPOSED GRADE �'• —_ ,,, w LO w
•Ai� •` ��```w w
STA=310+79 ——____
ELEV= 1119.80 •
605. — � -08%
STA=311+23J ••''
ELEV= 1118.51cn
;
STA=311+39 O
ELEV= 1118.68 STA=311+76 O
1115 ELEV= 1116.72 / 1115
ILl
S
1110 1110 0
308+50 309+00 309+50 310+00 310+50 311+00 311+50 312+00 312+50 (t U
I r t As 'hi
O 1 u ew a .' ��./
--= ',u,. ,v ,u. ,u. ,u. ,u,. di , •rr282+pp _ I
-if I„--_-_- -�- -- :,--l----_-'-j''j_47' ,,', - _- ------ ___---'ills,
1 q --A_—:_s_._E1,:A,:--,si
RN _ sa = _=_ 111
0
AC /= ;' ( , ,u. ,u. LS. ,u. ,u.l,u.,1w..Ii ;; .1w. ,1w. ,1w. ,1. ',1. ,1w. ,1w. !4'� �-V?�� --,/,' - ;,1 ! ___''„, --- bW3_j.
fir% C !_ 1120:-;' ._
,�.t/1`1 .n, �v4- ,u. yir.yu. Ilk Ilk Ilk Ilk Ilk 2. e`
✓Z -K --- 4 STA:282+89 19 — ,
,1u..Jk;1u.--;ua: s„ i r n===,,,' END BARN BRANCH - ; J ,,,,. ,1w,.-,,,,. ,,,,.
-{^� _ RESTORATION
i.
�_ ,�. ;\ i U I G 110:0= - STA:312+06 �. ,iw. ,iw. _
,F, rbs = —'" ; UT2 . Sheet Index
Q / =1_ == � t.m u u u
END REACH 3-RESTORATION
,•
•
diI
- _ ;_ _ BEGINREACH4-RESTORATION ;
-,Iu. q ,uy.'/,un. ,ue.-yu1E 130 1 �,�-- i _ - -_ ,1w. ,1w. ,1w. ,1w. ,1w. 2.2.1
1 iJ 'l,_;_ s ��,,/ \ ,
iu. ,1'w ,. 1 112S-- tO 31'a I✓'�,> 1Pi c. .0 •—. ./ ,1u. ,1u. ,1u.1,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. �,. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,t� ,1u. 2.2.2
...,
' `_ _��4 �`, .• Q:%>' •�''• ,1w= 12+00 ,1u. ,1u.- ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,1u. ,e,1u,.\ r .22.3
r„ 309+00... X.. • vCA>> "1i i• ' ` 6S / >j
..,/ >s. _.c4'; ,`✓ .-1 =";' STA:311+10 i "�• \
; `-�V}.___ - \ =`e\ UT2 ., ,m. ,m. ,m.;,m ,m. ` ‹ ,m. ,m.
�s.�. _- BARN BRANCH C LUENC c
�2S
vat 25
1.1 A��
--- / 50: r�• a �/' /►�.
k , oCYek � a co
--"1130----- -- J� E-� CE_ GE_=SCE��zCE CEO CE CE CE CE—CE CE CE / 37'/L� }„1rn ,ttexuntiro 2.3.3 l'J
1
1_ CE��CE Z2 j S� 0-0-"--. 2.6.1 x
v
_CE N
C
n
'� o
m
y//
�1,2
yy q t
----{- -----______-1135 -_ �, / J ..

/ 1125 1125 . /.
0' 2' 4' 6'
z (VERTICAL)
Q
0' 20' 40' 60' 06.,
EXISTING GROUND '4'z A m
(HORIZONTAL) U N q
ti Or) ui z
�Z z
0 n p
r, -� �/� /1 r`O / q- 2, L'
m ti r:I ., `m+i ti + • 4 N m w m PROPOSED BANKFULL / I-�w f�":'
1120 ¢-II m_ti m_ti_ti_-, ti_ —+_.4 o io 1120
1- > II II co N II II m .-I m , N , •N , ON to
w N W N N N W ¢ II ^ Q II m N m N 4- N O 1f1 0 �,�''
w m_�— _w_N_w �_� N_w.—II-II �11.I—II-II—m N _ -� m-� /
II w m N w N W m N N W Q II II .., `-' .., - LU OO ul W Oal
t~/1-W Q-II w m-.�-I '"'''—N-W -� N-W II-r' �1M II �' N-ti -.�i
w I > II II m ,y w ¢ II + ¢ II m N m 0 m N , ,
lalti
w
�L- I- w
_ wIA�....�....�, ---- - w ti w ti
J
¢ II m ri m
H.W ri 1/�j II }
LU t~/1 W N W� o ¢ II O Ol
0.8% ,-
1115 -ago ..._...._...._. - -- —, Lu
Lu II 1115
40 ..�.... IN 1-0
'/
/ NiY
...-..... i
/ --a of
....... AN.__ II
-ago
1110 -3.9 o 1110
PROPOSED GRADE
) (1)
STA=316+80 a--1
ct
cn
ELEV. 1109.45
O
U
1105 1105
312+50 313+00 313+50 314+00 314+50 315+00 315+50 316+00 316+50 317+00 317+30 ,i�
A
,,,:v. . .
. ,
‘,. .,\_,,,,,,,. ..,,..:__,..2•.-4
30/ * rQp • \ _'yw -n t Sri T ``,0\6!�-, L
S 30 .00.A�.r l.r �.. „ate`` a.• O`• 'ION�� _. •
?••�
' /30 a.�i�\in\iO;i��?i\.ri\ _\ re.• \---
r , i�•I",\�SaF ia�/ UT2 \ Z ',,`. ' 9t • cn
cn
. iIW. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. A ,Iw. ,Iw.,I. J✓" `1 • �a • ;�.:`-. _-- N'•�• \
.\-''1,%Di `Z:`4. C.
,Iw. ,u� ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw.,';Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw.L AL IAL AL AL AL AL„AVAIL AL AL S,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. �. - ' - J 0.�.` • �'�\'H 11
,ill. :� '`. S.
•
,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw.� ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ��.,Iw. Epp Q, ,M / Y �.• , �• I>x I I )1 !id �. -- `
,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. IL. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. . ,Iw. •,Iw. ,Iw.--' X 1` l,�O �x ''.p� •�1��'. )11.11/ \I' �y, a ', / �\ �✓ '1;1 ^�-• �o----- .AI�•••�.... O.�ti• ��11tl', �„`_.\ \mTz.7�,`` - -F�
,a,. ,a,. ,a.;,a,. ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. m,R` �. U SJ� ��'I• �� 0 111 .'t
S N. •
11 p �� /1'1 j/ ? m
Au ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. ,n,; ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. A...14.:I. ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. ,a,. AP ,e4•Alk.. ••1.4 ,a,. _ �• I•~ ��' \ j�r�j�e� • 4.*�'V�/S� --z:;I \'
I .)111 i �' 31Sx••�... i .AS/. IC�.o11/1 1 ././
,IW. Ic ,Nc ,Nc ,Nc w,„ ,Nc ,Nc ,Nc 41r. AL AL AL AL AL\Ac AL AL AL PF,AL AL u. - . _ • 00 • • %. •'M�°% N.".e.,11' ,
'4 "! 4✓ \ "' /` /41 P Sheet Index
•`�i:es I AL AL old pp • ,m.. ,m.. ,m.. ,m.. ,Iw.I,Iu,. SO.
,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,Iw. .. I - ` _ ./' ``,1 \ '%'I /
•
,O .y0. .-,„10,�•-t.'•u•„,,, ,. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,L ,.,I�p ./,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,L.\ --�----_"�'I
ioli"."::s�. '\ 2.2.1
,Iw. ,Iw. Q*' .. ,Iu. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,si-ull,Iu.. ,m.1 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL (A K.-�Iw.-iZ gun.- 0< '
x
ALA
_ _ ,ci ,Iu.. ,Iu.. ,Iu.�\,Iu. ,Iu.. ,Iw. \ •
•`i�v;. \ p "12.2.2
(...4,
S w w w w wl w w w w w w w w w w w w I,IL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL s PI
M I SAP
STA:317+28 •:^�:\ \ t�
Q• _ SA END UT2 JYi'�.:
,IL AL�`AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL�`AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL ,Iw. AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL \ _----- RESTORATION '\ :� ��2.2.3
,, ,,,,L`..k ,,L /n.. ,,L`,,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k�` ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k ,k CE ,k ,k E AL ,ILE,�.. CE� CE CE CE \ 1 .`s�J 2.2.4
LLJ I AL ,m.F ��,..I--w``. ;m.;,Iw. AL AL AL AL AL ,Iw. ,Iw.-\aw. ,m.. AtE.,I,, .,I,, Cam.-,� CEAL,-- ,6.E;u¢_,il.C,�.. ,m. AL AL ,m. AL ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. , ---�`SqF CF�1 '
z CIE. ,u.wt.;�SkE AL AL Ci.. AL ,�.. AL AL'IL AL ,u.,AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL i u==•=/ AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL ,�.. .'AL ,�. \ STA:317+34 iF `�\2.2.5 2.1.4 2.1.5
J \ 1S NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK 2.1.21
=IX
t,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,EF ,Iu..- ,,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw�_,,Iu.-,Iu. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. 'As ,Iu.. ,Iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw.'`,a�. ,iw. ,iw. Al \C 2.1.1 A•�/MI MU
�\ it - UT2 CONFLUENCE
\AL AL AL AL ALI
2 Yt As\`As ,Iw. As -' Ass—,IL 16444 ,ul:. au. As As As ,Iw. As Jilt ,Iw.``'* ,ul.-';Iu.. 'Iw. ,Iw. ;m.. 'Iw. 'Iw. ,Iw. ,m -Iw..'Iw. ,m.. '''' ,m.. ,m.. ,m.. '''' ,m.. ,m.. ,iw. ,m.. ,m�SgF. \ �� Cee k e 2.3.4 rA`?Q x u
�w\ r o •
oCCQ I \ ,..`.�. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ...\ ;a.��.. .. .. ..L/=y�. .. .. .. `ip. .. .. .. .: .--za.- .,n. .. .. .. ..;d. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. �ttle l���ntir ���2.3.3 Cr)G ,Iw. ,Iu.. .ul:--A. ,ul._emu.. ,Iu. ,Iu.. ,Iu.. ,Iu.. ,Iu.. q\,uI..1,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. /,Iw. ,Iw. ,uy__;,Iw.\,Iu. `lu. ,Iu. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. �ti,. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,iw.`w� ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. -,iw. ,iw. cl�01\' 2.6.1�� m ,
`� I - 1 N bl'2.5.1 m ••
72 r,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iu. ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw., ,Iu. ,Iw`.,Iu. ,Iw. ,It-_•-•.,__aw._-,,,, ,Iw. ,Iw. ,Iw. j•'. ,If.. ,If.. ,If.. ,If.. ,Iw. ,Iw. 4 4 4` h IIW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. ,IW. 4 I.��2.4.1 _
m
2 3.
,,r._ ,�. ,�.``. . ,l. `ru. ,�.`, ,1. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. _ -3v.'- .----- ,�. ;m. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ;nE ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�t 3 1 5 z 3 y
x p
,Iw. As ,m.,,Iy.','�'AL As ,m.F2 ��:,m. As As As As As As As As As As As ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,m:Syli. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. ,iw. - 2. o o u
I . . - . . F€n4.A _ / . J

/ VcA
z 1150 1150 0' 1' 2' 3'
(VERTICAL)
V 0' 10' 20' 30' z o
\V (HORIZONTAL) t 't 1 z
2z 5oom
\\ iZ gdHa
HW
1145 \ 1145
N
STA=251+71
\ ELEV= 1135.45
\\ STA=251+65
ELEV= 1135.45
\ STA=251+59 ^
\ ELEV. 1135.67 �'
I
I m ti
,, 0 ^� uo
STA=251+82
Ln ti r+, ELEV= 1135.23
■■■■■■�■.�■■ ¢ ° u 11, m m m STA=21134. /\
2 + a I ,� ELEV= 2+28 6 z )
1140 v, Q N `, ,n ti-u, ti-o u?—^I u? Iln up 1140 1�
■■■■■■.�E■M■ W t~/1 > 1,1 Q > Q II Q II N 7'-I N N S11 M 1
V~1 � >-�Ln >—I1 II N
111111111
PROPOSED BANKFULL
\
EXISTING GROUND LIFAkisffilL.
liiiiiit, 1
1135 ; 3, ••• •.4•4 0 -1.9% •_ 1135
STA=251+54 . ;
ELEV= 1135.00 Fr, ' i .1.9%
STA=251+68 < r a--1
r
ELEV= 1134.80 IN /
IT
DI
=251+79 _
ELEV= 1134.61 — _
STA=251+93 STA=252+16 - , '�
ELEV= 1134.33 ELEV= 1133.91 PROPOSED GRADE brJ b U '0
O
STA=I 252+32 �\
ELEV= 1133.62 O ,-a
1130 1130 ..,
250+00 250+50 251+00 251+50 252+00 252+45 E z
i ! ,�. ,�./-,�. ,�. ,�. ,y.. ,�. ,�. sub .�. .�,. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,,,,,,..ti,. ,�. ,�. >_ ,�. ,�.,�. ,�. ,�. ,�.,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�.� . ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�.• -----
tiL,lu. ,m. (,Iw n'70+p0 i°" ,m. ,lu. .. ,lu.x�w.';lu,. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. .Ills-'Ili, ,m. ,m. ,m�';m. ,m. .m,,;�,m. ,m. ,m. ,u�sus sms sms sms sm. sus ,!14._ sus sus sus ,lu. ,u�sm. sm. 4 i* sus....�Ik.--4_.sus sus A.'\ I _ Li)
\\, \� ,m, Ai Ak., =-4, y.',m, ,m, yu.' `,m. ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m,,",Iu-`,m, ,m, ,m,,_AT-,m. ,m, ,m, A ,m. ,m. ,m. Ai:: Ak Ak Ak ,m. .mC j. __ ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m, ,m.ill—,ll, ,mi/ ,m,:',m, __ ,m.yw.-wu. ,me - ._ --- e6
STA:70+00 sm. I ,lu.'�sus slay sus sus ,lus''-slus�,(1 sus-;IP.L1,lu._sill._-;Iti. sus sus slu.,lw. sus .lu. sus__*--a: sus sus .lu.,-;�u. ,lu. ,lu. .lu,.„', ,lu. ,lu. ,lu. ,lu. ,lu. , STA:251+47 1140 r_ r 0
GIN TRAPPER TRIBUTARY `-' = RIFLE TRIBUTARY I U i
v. sly. ,m, ,uy. ,m,ism. ,m, ;`vu,. ,m,"9A.m,: ,m, ;_aw ,m. ,m. yw. ,m. ,m.,fly-"S: ,m.",iu.__ ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,�y.,'„w. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. BEGIN PROFILE REVISION ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,iw ,m.
ENHANCEMENT II _1;----- - • C!•)
,m. ,m. ,m. em. ,lu. nd.--,md.-- *,,m.,Su. sm. *---sus ,m, sm. sm. sun.' sits -_II.—ram sm. sm. ,m.,,m.--;IL," sms sm. sm. ,w. --„w. — — sms sms sms sms sms sms sms sms slus sm. sm. -----1140-i. (�
‘� \ \ \ '�\\Al, sits Au Au! Au'�. 4 ,m.I,4 ,m. -,m—13- ,m. �w',m. ,m. Ay ,m. A4--;-L- ,m dVl- ,ms_ \�m1,.,b-CA ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,,h ,,h_.,m...nw_.,,h_.,m.-.,m. ILL, ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. , Cn
, ', �j. ,ills, 'ALL sill, ,el, sill.,sill, .m, ,u4.`Y"". lu. sill, ,.�4s sill, sill, sill, �u4 sill, ;u4 sill, h;1x0o sill, `yzm,-';m,_..aw_,zu2 -_._,fi&S_ -�.,u� ,m. ,m. ,m.�`xu. ,m. ,lu,�,m. v�,w. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m.__,u�Flu..- - 'll"-nl"- �� _. ------ ---
1 ,ilk Xu. ,m.�;,m. ,uiy ,m.`�,m. ,m;" ,m. ,m. ,i, ,m. sly.",m. ,m. ,ie. ,m. ;iP.,m. ,m. , �l�,m. ,ul�—,iw-.-yu;. ,m. ,m. ,IIL. ,m. ,m. �u. ,m. mm ,m. ,m. L�. ,m.=,�r—" ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m.� ,m. ,m. __ --
s G Sys o� , ` " = F
�1 it \ �,As`se' Ai sill. A` A` A` AV AK A' A' A-,\ II ,m. ,m. ,;u..' ,m. ,I_lla--,m. AL �f�.- ,II m1, ,ills::AL AL AL ',III. AL,,mew_ AL AL AL Z AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL `.?. ,m. ,,h _ T __ j
\\20, ,4 Lw ,m,`skis Al,,m, `\Id. `,\,'`,,m, ,m, AY:1% 49.-= 1140- , am. ,m.a,y82,m. ism. + N, aai,:,h_ \th2,,,ku,z,m. ,m. ,m. ,h/iv& ,m.• ,h ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. - 4,-gym._ T,67--,h ,m. ,m. _____I
- _--_-----
.uj. sill,„ills ,ills, sill,\yld. A �_.,m. ,sill, 4./ ..c -- 'h,.sill, sill, sill, , sill,t fin: i'# *1pu s sus sus my,'`,' sus sill, sill,_,m.l,.,.1 e T6) ,m. ,m. ,m. * ,m. ,m. sm. - ,lu. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m7 �i,. ,m. ,m._,Iw.--,LI,". ,m. AF\ ,c`, m \ saw / 1 - S =-
III
i 1 11,d. \m, 4`s& ,m\4`m. AL',4 mil. Al..4 , 'mom-,hI,-- ' _ ,m,- =, �w. PI, ,�4,,m! sA, ,m. ,m2, ,m. e, ' -4u:-,ms;,m.`vl.-_,mom-sills. /B� ,,,i ,�u. ,m:",m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ;_.— - -- ` 1w ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m.,yw- _"';,lu; `wwsill, qlwail ,ul�`, ,m, ,m,,,m, ' �Id,,/AI. ,m, ,m,'\ ; `"'�. `'m`Si, ,m, sail ,my';�,u�,'� ,m, ,m, ,i�. ,m, ,m,^ `-A.,m, ,dl. ,slLz,,,m, ,ill,`,,yu, ,m, ,Iw 'S yw, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,Iw-= ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, •yw._,14�- -�Iw:-,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, i _—_-
•
. \,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,uy-;ills _,-
. . Chu,. ,iL. ,m, � ,m. ,m, ,m, ,m,�\, 9,m.`.� ,m, ,m, ,m,,.d.. yus;',yc.' ,m, ,m, ,m, � ,m, ,m,'`alu:.`� ;\ ',w.••,ry..:yus ;m�\�,u),•'m, ,m, Lm, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, i•—� :::::
,m, ,m,,
h F
i ; STA 70+49 ! \ _=-:=__ �. �: _ - '._ •.
i ' END TRAPPER TRIBUTARY w ,Iw `,,u ,ul, ,ul,d ,ul�-;m, sill, sill, sill, `„uie\ "; =vd-:�w";Iw; sill, sill, sill, sill, ,m2. sill, sill, ,dn -�,y„��,I:,sill, ,m;: ,m,.-,Vl: ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m,%,m,,m,13y�; -- cnTla_loss ,ul, ,ul, ,ul, �Art..s
' `, - — \ `�`��` -� `'•�= _ - \_ sill, sill.',S, yi.i
ENHANCEMENT II ,m' ,m.'` ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,y' ,m, ,m, sm;,-, nu, ,m._,iii,^_,m,-;uy�-dl.--uE-yu. LL,,m, ,m, ,m\,m, ,m, (�ys. .,, ' (( ,,.,-- ;y, - _ ,q'!�'w`,,'.yr` _
I ,hiss ALL ,m,. ,II, ,m,.`\Oslu. AIL AIL eI;.`.�U�- AIL AIL``wl. AIL AIL �`,m:Fri-�.--Ida , 'm`1i4o AIL ,m, ,lu,\wl. ,lu. ,IW:.,,lu. ,lu.`>m,``.lu.`'w�; ,lu. ,IW`'`alA;`sW�, �.,,u;..,W``.ilw_-,m, ,m, AL ..l,=>m�,N,�, % •.— .)c• _" —- '' •�� —:•� Sheet Index
f'h `Nu, AL 'h ism, ,m,\=lass ,m, •P.la`,m, ,m, ,m, ,iw:-gym._ ,m, , ,m, ,m, ,m,-,m, ,m, ,m, i,. ,m, , ,m, ,m:. ,m, ,m,\ \,suss , --- ,m;.�,m.. yu, ,''m'�'m`,„b<..,uL._,mi.- _sill,__ .'"'� :� = I
u. �! _. _ `'
' ;' /' i ,m;. sill,,%sill, ,u�. sill, sill, `=lu. T" sill, J� sill, sill, sill, sill, ,m,j,m, ,sill, sill, sill, ;lu.:- -.im, sill, sill, ,m sill, ;a�. sill, ,u�.,sill, sill, ;lor\,ills,'-,II(._,';m:'-,ill. 1,w ,iu�;mu:'`im,, - '...'��-•:-- ``• 7.-•• ---- 11112.2.1
__�, --_ '�;;., 252+00 _ _ =; �
i ,mv' ,m„',m, ,m, I„m, ,m, ,m, ,m, •\�,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, '-.,ill, ,m, ,m,',�--„w-- :iIQ�„o. ,iu.-_yu. ,m, „li.�\,m, ,m,``.,m, ,m, ,m, ,im..�,m, ,m:1,m, salsa;�,w. ,a.1 d'---i'�-'_`` - �• .
m
' , , , , : �' �,m, ,Slw ,m, ,m,l nw ,m, ,m,. '\�,m,_�Iw_alY.__nIG.__,ld.__,ld.__,ld.__ ________ _____ ,m,``,Y�. ,m, al ,m, ,m, ,m, Nis,..,,m,` ,m, ,m, ,m,'-.II4�-�Id. "- � 4_�_ __ _
eIl
" / , ' ,m, ,m, ,I�,. ,m * ,yc�� *-- *-- ,m, ,m, , yu. ----- --- iw.. m, ,m, ;m.' - --- - ...
'45
.,
` / ,p '_ _,sins sill, sill, i ,ill. ,m�--,m;.-Flu, sus sus sill. /45 a.--.,Ilk. sus _ --- --- _,- --F1ij'�y:-.. L-Itir
sill, sill, --vv< sill, sill, sill,
iiiRi
-II
EmomI ti, _,,m, ,airs ,m..-,m, ,m,_,m._ .,.-- ,m, �.d5 -__-- - _ -- ,m,------
_,m, ,m, ,m, ,m, i.._• -,jjl-
' �.- ._ --_ --- - EN LE TRIBUTARY -_ --__ r
22.2.4
: d5 jd9 ------------- ---- -_-__-----__- - _ - --"d' ___- """__ ENDENHANCEMENT
5 - ---- `��2.2.5
, '(Lff ' _
J
.1.211
__- STA:250+00 ----1150------- --- - _ - _ ------------ "`" `1140 1 2ry
--__ Igo 2.1.5
2.
BEGIN RIFLE TRIBUTARY ----- - ---- - -------------- __ _- --- - ,�dS �� eveek♦r, r o •
ENHANCEMENT II _ _ _ ---__ ------- '-_ -
-- --------- ---- ----- C� —CE�CE��� - II --- -- �0�01IS--Oel3Isnntirc 2.6.1 ���) 32.5.1 u�o
CE
v
1155--_-- ---- _ _ 4.1 _
-
1
x 7 0, =� g
CE
CE T lir2 ECE IS CE �� \ . z 3 1
/C� _SCE Ck—CE,� SI,•, SA 0 o` u
/\. J

/ V 1
z,cA
o a 0' 1' 2' 3'
0 0 /�
vD ti oN No IveRTicnLl I—I a N + cri
II `0 ti m ro
0' 10' 20' 30' 'Z z o
v~i w II o ^ �"'�w
w Q N M (HORIZONTAL) W z N ,y
t~/1 II o 0
.-I N '-'-' Q > N Ln o
1155 0-0 `^ w-¢-II- -�—�1p 1155 i Z t H a
N ,y—N'-Oa) J N-J—II_`-'.—O+_m—W_m
STA=260+00 II + 1 Lt., II io ti + ry ~w
ELEV= 1151.63 Q->-Q-� m-io 1— J.—a-'-' 0 ti N N
IN
�� L'J Q . l3D ,may P1N—w- N 1 •< II O+ O-ollD
■tea_'
1150 `• u, a_II-N_7-+_,i N_o0-w-II -N- 1-4-o� 1150
QI_ ~ L>„ II n Ln Q II II 0 m N a)
Vl_ -Q_II-N_� +_m i- >—Q_II—N_'-4_
STA=260+10 1 u>, II ti '^ ' r w_II_ m
ELEV= 1149.65 `�-;- -II N-rl w-'^-w II-r, ,
> II co ¢ > `� L -PROPOSED BANKFULL /�
STA=260+22_ ^�,\r`r,-w ¢->-o-a ml� LnN-w- -II-o �^ - N /^
ELEV= 1148.31 N o ti
o
m-'—
N
o
•. \ 1-1-1II N o Ir + r'
II
1145
1145 ¢ II _.ti—o-mNru
•
/'STA=260+34 — Y_ • \ -> I I ^ � y oS II—w
• `" Lt Lta _ii
J � ± y)ELEV= 1146.97 _ _ 47_J—HaI ti , —a_ I .N
STA=260+46 _ �I—• �. • w '" II m N w w 0rn
r� -■ ELEV= 1145.63
STA= 60+58ilM• w—~ w— `�-J
Iwioti-a `^ ``, — � .,>''-'1401140 ■ ELEV= 1144.28 o—rnlm_.w
„
STA=260+70 • , > ro
I
,`,„ uQII
ELEV= 1142.94 I \ N w � ,,
STA=260+82 II I t u' >
ELEV= 1141.60 I / / Al
1135 STA=260+94 / \ .
.
ELEV= 1140.261 / 1 .7=
STA=261+06 \i I^
ELEV= 1138.91 \ I
STA=261+18 1 1 N
1130 ELEV= 1137.57 I I 1130
c▪n
STA=261+30 1,1 1t
ELEV= 1136.23 STA=261+68
STA=261+42 ELEV= 1132.92 0
ELEV= 1134.89 _STA=261+54
ELEV= 1133.54 a-▪ -I
1125 11125 U
260+00 260+50 261+00 261+50 261+77 ,.6
- / O ft
\u� u� Z P�
i
, , .,/ :'1 ; \ ‘‘AL AIL \
{Z9 w a
3D— 3D 3D 3J�-3D-i 3J—/'-3D 1 ,
0
35 ' I ,I iii 4II jtl � if ` C/3 MIL _. '-_ S` `—
ST END BM P i k cn
I' wows, ,ui> \\ \ s a--I
BEGIN OLD BUS BRANCH '�'' 1 - ��r' �4t����:a!°'; "�\'01, ` s7.1\ `\
'r RESTORATION yh0 i i^' �� , / • '�F;\ ``` `at41'�`� ,uy\,u4 �` � \ `r6f• fJ.i
m- a
OLD BUS BRANCH. `, AF:
' • -_ _ ;_- - _ CipaS ''yu�' STA:306+89
STA:260+00 I _ % ;1140'_<',i?,1135''� ___ -,_ i -- fe IYII�`. UT2
BEGIN BMP 'i� i --- Its OLD BUS BRANCH CONFLUENCE
„ \f• ..
, , / _---,------__ - ---:::---- ,---,-"---::"---'-. \--'s4 -- "<'.. '-'', ' '''..---' ''' •,4.• •j.'s\„\`‘ \\ ' •:9) ‘`
I ----- -------- — f- /,,,,
,,-r 261+_00_====_- ___ `\ �. "�o�� Sheet Index
f� ,'�• J1,> 'il . O
r F
• m • `\ • \ % • ��i.i�MA.11`�} t25
OLD BUS BRANCH •
\(-STA:261+75 �BEGIN RESTORATION CREDIT •• END OLD BUS BRANCH `` { + 21 !� 2.1.4 2.1.5
E `CE RESTORATION a►
_CE `'`' _ I 2.1.1 A��'I�' �� m w
• �CF� p I 1 0 ��� 22.1y.3�/ 3.4 x
CE Ct-<— `\ I I xuntir°o CYeek't��2.3.3 /'�•
CE�`„.,
. . , \7 ` III Nr�01�,itt�e 2.6.1 �1'� V J
,,,
, , ,
. .
, .
,6
..,„, ____ _
CE�� • SFs: . II I I r }} �� �=2.5.1 m
„.,,,
. . .
,,
. .
,, . __„,..,... 1, „
s,
, ,
, , „ ,,,
CE=CE , ,
i! I} 2it
3 �I2.4.1 w N
. ,„„ ,,
„„.
„ „,, .„ „„‘,
, „, , , , , ,,„,„ /
,. ..,,,,, „ ,,,,...„., ``7'7`rS. N.
CE ``. \\\\ ,
i,' E m
‘‘ \
N.
SCE=

C . /.
o o
+ r_i
o 0' 2' 4' 6'
11 8 6 '; -,. (VERTICAL) Q.) ,tI
0 ,-9
,
1135 - - - 1135-, . -,,- -+-6 a,_o 0' 20' 40' 60'
,..,.., _. 1, o o + od .o'I z 0 <P:2 Z t
,, ,,, 1- > c, '-' + • 00 , r, (HORIZONTAL)
'!'2),
z 5 '.'
.-I tO V, 1.1.1,r a) " 1— > 2- ,2,'.•'. L'
± •
._.,..?, _, + •‹c . V, Ia.!
LO Ia.!
CO .0 LO LI,r, Lu Z d H
0, 0, I-1' ',•?,
uo▪ Ia.! +-r.....:
0 co ,I) 0.1 r0 Lr, rn
CO
r,
•••••.LU LU
-•'\Ile% .;:t_r,.-I,, 00800 .0080, r.,,,dr, r,9, r.,,,6c,
c, •-1 c.,, •-, 00 ,
•.o I— > •-1 •-i r‘i r, PROPOSED BANKFULL
• LO 1.±.1,
II .,,c II r, 00 IN CO
1130 ••••• . - 1130
,
AT ... ':... \,-, ,, Lt ,, CO ry' 0,•, rrl
V r, %.. , i<L,_>11,.<11 ,,_,:,,_,,r; co•L rO
1..fl c-0
ZS
•• \. V, 1.1.1 I— > CO ,:_l
rtr,,,:>:
CO ,
• CO c-0 + , .-I tO
‘1:S:
PROPOSED GRADE
L.,-, Ia.! .;:t II Up •-! r, 0 (r)
r, + 6
iThN
,..,,• oo
STA=280+64_7 • •.-S \ 1.1.1 I•q r-I
•:::( II r‘l `-'
'IN ,I)
EXISTING GROUND 1- > " 0 0 •Ni
ELEV.= 1127.04 1,
STA=280+80 •.....;-- ''' '-±1 r, rn Lu L, !K9 , + 6
Lu N -' o0I, rO 00 CO co c.9 cO c9
ELEV= 1125.92 ••.N r„ + ,„ rO rO .-I;
, - .,r 0 r, 00 00
0, r, r, 00 0)
1125 1 •••.-- / \ 00 r‘i cr., .,. .< —1 ro ,0 r, c,_r,_c,_r, + cr.;
r‘l ,
STA=281+00 - 1125 c, r, ± • 1— > II +-cr;
II •-' •-' 7' ' LL1 < "or,j %, <C " <c" II <," II CO ,
r‘l
•
ELEV= 1124.89
•• \
•• uo Ia.!
uo Ia.!
u,
STA=281+22 •, ---____
ELEV= 1123.49 ••,-3io -----
...:4; ----___
STA=281+46 •.."'• N
\ -1
ELEV= 1122.22 • ,
••••••••-\••• r•,-11... 1 '-0 8%
1 '1:9% \__.1 -% •I• rr.....__. __
STA=281+72 -0.9% a.)
1120
ELEV= 1121.17 1 .8%
I i
1 I 1120 •,-i
cn
STA=281+87 j II •,-i
ELEV= 1120.35 J ,—i
' 0
ELEV= 1120.09 I STA=282+90 •,-i ct
-I- CD
282+55
ELEV= 1119.89 Ct C.) ,--i
STA= biD ;4
0
ELEV= 1119.41 •,-i ,_.
-I- ;--i
;-1
0 7i
X Ct
1115 1115 Ct _ ., it
(1)
280+00 280+50 281+00 281+50 282+00 282+50 283+00
_
-I- Scf) Przi
__ _____ ,____- ..,„.- _________
„ ----- - _ „-- _ _ -- ,--- __-- _.. ,
- - ' ...- - ---- ,.......-
- 0
,,,-- „,--- = „.„, __------- ___.-- ;--i
__,„ „ --- •- / / -,‹22/;-" ,"E r.,-..-_:- -- 0 3 3 ,n 32,-1--
,_ , rt u
.-
_.____
_„-- ' -35--7'3)-----5) ?,;;%--
...--
--- •„- ,—30„..-- 0,----, 33 ./.‘" STA:312+06
"
; „---__--- ___--- - - , '4. -i— 4
__-- -- ,..„-)• • / „ / UT2_- ,-
;
,,/ ---- ,,,v3-3—7'-'13-7-7'-'31-------i-j_-_-77111-_-:_ .,_ _ _ _ ,, --11;_____________ -_-_-_Y-_- _if 1 ''` 4-'1 / ' END REACH 3-RESTORATION\ -----; „---- ' ,---- ..''' ---.- , , , __ V,\ \sh9,.,, . c y,
BEGIN REACH 4-RESTORATION
,----- ,
_ , __I_,..- „\_.„;.--:,.,,,,,.1 ,,,...3-, /, , „...:_
, ....- ,,, ,,,
,' 0'
4 ,/ ,
,/ / '1, AL AL AL
'b
', '
,' r 's,
',,,
1 /' / , .•
,
5 .,', --'-'-':',.--! „/ STA:282+89 I AL AL AL AL,
,,..,..,.: ---
A' _., ,
,
. .e..:.-:" ::. -of; , AlgilAroylionly,,,1, END BARN.BRA Sheet Index
,
,
4.i, ,.L ,.L ,,o' ,.L ,,i ,.L j,.L ,.L ,14,-1.L ,.L *,-,‘"',.L 44,,,i,:,,,•:IL' oo-r---- •••••••:::2--f,-,,,V-- • •••••••:•••. '', , •.5P••••:*•••• ,, ,,,,,,2;2•""'n'ileuvt. i -- i %%•
% 1 C
/ -- / ' ',,2S°+ •"'•.',U--:‘sr..•-' ---,Ilan •.11-="4"....-r-. ' ' ...• \ . , b . ,
, ' n /6.1\1',... •...... 1
A's Au Au lil Au 1,11ic Au ",illc Au Ag Au AIVIL Au Alc/Alc ill, 4 -'••••• ''----;`-',--:','\ '' .,-'.1,i,, ' • \
-----,_„, "••••••••,' •.•••••• 281 00 ' Ill'' '''' 'th` 4` 'th` '''' " '
,,,*. i 11/1 2.2.1
',--•=--,..Y ',, ,
'' ,, , ..i.-It,
,.\c?••,"------ .1 41-- .0• •/ 1
<I
r As Au 1A/s Au Aii Au 4 ,L ,Li,L ,h,,,,• ,L ,L ,L,',L ,L
1 1
i , \ ,i2,,,L ,L ‘L ,L ,L ,L& 1.,,,,L ,L ,L ••', ,//,,,,,' ,' ....31.1.±•°°,7:-.3er-i...."',
. '
' 1
111 2.2.2
, ',‘ i * *\\* */* * *'...,*--- ;,/ ' t. or- • . '
Z . E'•:1,
,
j . t
I AA Au /Au Au Au ' \•\ ' r .,...• ....BEGIN BARN BRANCH \ ', `, ', ,
,' ,
,c2 '
, I
, ,
r r Au 1 Au JJZ Au :ill, Au --`, 1
+,_ '..;''''',1,2n, Au Au \ILL Au .B/3RNss 13,RAN •1
/ •• '...., STA:311+10
* , RESTORATION .... • ' ,hi,/ 112.2.3
, .„..
, ‘ ,
, ,* .1, ,h •,__ __--- ,,
,
, ,
10
\--------, ,,,, ,',/ .441,1.; . C.-
I
, ‘k------ s,, , \,,, •• „ „-' , , ' 2.2.4
'
/. ". BARN BRANCH CONFLUENCE V \
‘isit 2.5 'a'
` \• ,,, ,,,
„ I „
,
. N-. S
,,,, ,
, • , s s
, 2.1.4,r_ 2.1.5
,\ „
• `,. „‘,,
,,
,,, , 's, , , • ' ••• . „„ 2.1.2It
., •
• . ,, , 1 , t •
\'‘•
\,,,,,,C • 2.1-1AlltalillotillrLIAVal
, \ I
n
•
-ss i,io, I'd
,
•, ., ••••., ,,, ‘,
,
o ,, , , , • <.> • I
2.1.3\
g \•?
40 .,
, ,
,
, \
\ s
,
"
`
, \
\ s
1 n
I 1
,
1 s,
s
, (• '1•00."..••
..„ , •
,erAir2.3.4• s,
,
,
, NN ,. \
,
s \ \ 1 n' 1
1 \ N.
‘•
, s , r --- ,„ X c
, s,
, ,..-- --•- 6- s, , kt\e
Ark Z)
\ ,
• 0111.0 2.5.1 P.] ,
. \
\ \•,
•
••• 1\'‘'n'
, •
2.31.-W.44,2 4 1 - = N
, „ss „ • "
,
, , -.7., 1 1 •__„
'
' .. --. ss, ss, -,/-•,- \
, \ \
I
„,... ,......._

/' ;,, '' ;' WIDEN AND STABILIZE EXISTING FARM ROAD v
�V W 33 FE
'/1/(C/ ; \`\\:\\`,` `•\ :`:, ;''',`;\ ; SHEET_3.2__; ._ Ma
%' ,,/ SEE SHEET 3.2 tea\ ii)
UT1 Reach1 1'll -
'S ' 11', 1- �
'I;
ti _ "
1 I'` _
1 - 1'
_I C' 3740 Cut
Q.
„
,I
„
„
„
, I
"I
rar '�1%;"l ll' i °
i>
Y I - 4' z
II
'<'� 2640 Fill - _- 1 I
I'
I, _
%I 1100 CY Export to UT1 Pond 3
II, - u,;
JERRY A. e`- -
F II;; I,r
III i II - r/J
,f _ _
and 1
r III r/,
S S�
'1' III' - i
r ,
- 'i4^'
_ `t'
1\ 1� - DEBRA LYNNIOHNSON
I _ -
' - D.B.0668 PG.110 - _- - - - = I'r"/ �
`(, - _ - sc
„1 's
- PIN4827 97-1287 - - 'II //"/, �7",.t\
,,, ,,,,1' ,'\ , , 1 r,r a, ,-a ,\ `:.:-` _ _ ___ -____`--_--_`_1i=:,^ 11 i/' _ _ _ /lii'l "r;iil ;;I;; //
,l „1 ,' , ,, .- ,, - t . , _' - -.,_- ____•__ .11 •. ,, _ ♦- - - - _ __ _ lII/''I'/ 1r// rl„','Ili,','i':<- '\ i.. J
, r ,),,,,,),,,,,‘,,,,,,,,,\,,,,,„;‘,,,,,,,,,, -,,,,I ' ,�. ♦ , __� __ ___________________ __ x'. ,V _ Il_i _ _ _ ___ - I//,/;I /l,i'r /.,gy, r...,'� ,
/
i
,-
lI ., .-__ ----:---_.r,e ,. � / ''z. 1`."". - - - %i;;/'''/;'li;';!'/;l;;;i7;%'4''` lir
Ya ''
.y
n`
1
fr
X� I, '\, \',,,♦ ,, , -_---- ' I ' „/' --- ,'i.'/'" - -- - ;/1 III ,
, 1' `\: .): .�� __-__ /%' - 'i/iii _ ___ ,/ ,i rli
', , is''''
, 1, r\,`1,`I r 1 a," �ti"- 'r'Yr` UT-1 Reaches 1-2 'o'i _ \/r ',,I /', __-- - - ,r' /q;;rl' '`°11' ..
I� �. �-- - ' --- - ` _' . ._ ----_=--- -_ -;,;/;;,/, IIII' , J
Y� V. ,ADDITIONAL GRADING AND- - /1' f
1' ';I;;'I
\
•o
PROPOSED SPOIL SITE 17620 Fill 1
i a``F,
11u �
7'
`\`1 'S
1
1
•n r`-5750 CF Fill Capacity ' \'\; $��'
_ P v} SEE SHEET 3.1� '
i;�r "
a'rr� r- '1
_-ate - ',�� -
R�.a, aa'112 r.'. - ,gam
r l' - '/' - rT 'r
�'+�� in Pond _ - "
'I ,q
'f•'
1 ,�4�.
''i/irlr,;,, X
`�'%_'�.'�'` • • -JERRY A'
�f
s< -
Y- and �=30`WIDE DUKE ENERGY� ;'/%"�
5`
_J
- 441
1a 'i,'ii
4.
•�� DEBRA LYyN N 10HNSON -
- UTILITY EASEMENT - - -
_
- - D.B.06$1 PG.14
- - ��' _ DB 0194 PG 054 - !, -
--
lt
. li
PIN:4827 6 5044
'ca-' 'T _ y
I;_
1 ,,y _ y" yT _
- 'J
yi. xJ -
.sa'.'�N' =;y
�. mot° 'j
- �-, 'sue
.
,
0 \' '>x
mARK
.
yh and -
r%%%i"'/ r�'1 MIGH ELLE R.CA55 1 -
at, I G, = z
4 ��
[� C4.\
1� _ £fA
`\``, V" GH
r 'i D.B.b•723 PG.527
- 'c
9
_ \4 � jI
1
' PIN:4 �954754'' �x
_ - / JJ« • f 4
" V 'f'I '
•
u,4'I' ,4 -
__� `,L,_ __r (y `.�i,`',,_ ,1 '!-" � rll _/ J' y•i'/„y r,///,'r,'i 4 y{'/` -�
- :\,"`,\\.,\",', ( _\ ,lily.== .F, /,✓'i/error,/,.,i,,� -=;"':^-
1' •
- -' :: w.� •ea y, - �,{ ♦ .�\ I,/fir/ii%,'.
I rl' S r, ',ii
- 1' "Yl _ 4i
_ ,b •p `:f it%, //
' r'i � 1
- /I I,
�G I , I/
_ - . y 1
/,Il I,rl/4r r l
`\� Q _ \-i-f � WJ
- -- r, _ c , , , , , :..` _..._- - - - _ ' i�ryi' Al `'�lii .\ _ _ 4. ♦�)
, i �_ ,• '___-_ '/ , \`4 -. \ , � „1 I,,,,,, ,.�_,i..::, - - �, - �'y' '- T �r,ll;':ill,rr rr,,;rrl rill l'llll,,, \I` ,�/
-- - 'n= ,G� 2 -`•'�',��=R.-- '=-'__-`>cTYr__. sEC�,' . � ,i'�' 1:r' ,/ ! • ,r rl, , l,l,,ln III,,,,1"\'\� - _
-- ----` �_� • \ ;I`..` _� ----- - - _ - - 'Fa`-^, '� ,.�,K, /;,n,ll yl rl I I„IIIIII,u 1„' _ �J •'ti
- '--'------`- ='=� 'I I I I , �'`� " _ - - \\• 1 /.(.,'.' ,t,, 0 14''ll nl „In,\\ ,
, - _ _ , .._. .K. I I�J�, I , , _ _,-___ .`_ __ % ___ - 1`, r,l Irllril"'il,l'\I'i„',' _
_ '-- _ ,. ' „-�' . dllplq,ll'r,0,1',l'I II'r,l,,,,'--- __—' -, ., r•-I -- '-`'�_---- ,x.:.,... '' '��I r/ • / \,J, - - ter;';;;�:;
_- , - , . -----' _-- `---� , , ..:-.- . \ ' G ,',`, 5 ,� / ?�` -- "- ' \ F-1
..._ , ,•,, ,li 'il;r Al, „\,, \ - - x' 7'Lz'7 ,1 `\
' -' '--- -' -- - .-__--- ---' ` ,'r, , III' r /', ,/ /' {'�` 9\ ;. , - s�,_'.l \'
_ _. � --__- .-- _-_, I , � . __ _. , :CI I, ,„/;, � I`,�'7 _- ,GPI 11r',n';'.,\`:"\\„"`` - ---- - -
irk
O n �y
/ - _ ,l e'lt.‘47,_.:
>ij. III'`„, -- - - `- ';'I` .%;,'1/, G�r' V
r3
•
=- "--- ', ,<. . I ,- ... ,I ---- - „ ,_. _. _'. ' .` �:,%: ;;/;' �s _ _ - fir` '�' 'I,, ,,` - \'/ rl
a-
_ , , ________ _____ __ . , r'. < � III , II(.I r ,... �✓• _ _
., 1 _ sS IIIIll) ;%v%%� -- - \\ J•'` :�t`\; - _-
--___ _--- ,;fill <.,y
•
,r,-Z--„:.---
,\\\\\\\N-,',-‘,N 4'•' 4
' 4n N - - \,
ii
/
G
. \ , R ' r ,,, ' ii%'iir � ,.i`\ae` __ - \"„\\`,,,\`\,
•
=> -'" - - ;30'WIDE DUKE ENERGY' r;f: O L• /%/` 'cti: 31 - ,\'
_ ?tea
•
•
-_ __ _ - - ____ UTILITY EASEMENT /'; s/. - ,I,,,//' - cT, _
•^__ -' ---` r "_=''' --.;;;'-_--'.-—":"�''_�`-%-' r •'4^ h �,yy 'IIII <„,
,\`,
- ---- .I' 7f'/ n_ `•tea': - =4. '�'� '�
/ an A
/ l /
- - __ - -- _ __ _ '��% I ,✓ i� S '/t1\ .\� f m= d.: . , - sro,-\`\'- `4l 1.
- _ Vi ',..
�9
- aaGw.a`*`
_
. i
^
_
_s
L
, y //1
h
i ,
,
,
r'
I -
,. r r_ r � 'r _: " ,i,/ „1- _ IIII ,•d',.` `P • _- � `i�`�
\ry st _-• _ _ _ •` - _-! ' r -:', ,_i, r, yt,ry I.' .�/ :I,i'I - \.l� I','' ___
R`
ti�
- N F +0
�{ '1,%ir
. 3 PROPOSED SPOIL SITE 4/;' _ ,I %rr S ',rr
- ,;,�'',,l'.d.'.ai�£ ,�' U' JERRY A. '`'i' ':``3," '/, %- ,.� '",
_sP �e / / and /,1 ::.a-:::c . '_.ry-.o I� "_ - rt ����``/';,, ,//„
_ JERRY A. ..f O - l ` - '`i - -
- DEBPSALYNNJOHNSON �,.` -G -- _ / ';
_ - �DEBRA LYNN 10HNSON - -
- IN:4827-94-1858 %/'
- \c
r ,
,
/ '-- �-_„-...---:_--:_,\ --'
� - - P", ,..� D.B.0653 PG.160 / ;=r'---- - - - '// ';/;;:'' --------.� (0 c ' I( I;1;i re /,9%/
4 , "'' - -",=::= �S -- •'- ,?�: ', 'Ir// --- I 1 I ,III'/, ,'v,'
1 .,,-`.� , PIN:4827950384 , 1, ; I,' �' - - - ,'\, �' \ 1 -- --
' s's ,,,i';,I ',I ';'/; - ---�"', "i!=':-- "---- -- _ III
'-'-_ r ,. � , ,',;,,/ - ILL-EXISTING -- �- - "- -- --_-
-F TING CHANNEL
_
.
titli-
-----------_£=_'-- '.--:`.`;..\\.\ .. ,,,,$ ,:%:''; SEE SHEET 3.1 �1I ---- - --- --
[ i`
_
��i
Ir.__ / - .., .. . ..,, , - l ,,,/, ,. / , _ I I \ ,.. ___ ___—___ -_ '_ _ -,:,;;,;;,-:,-,-..,:-:"..,.,1-$ -
,
-__. , ..,\... „ , , _ ,--.. •. r /,,, " r/.�. iiq I , .r /' � .J,
'lir - - 1
', I
-
1 I 'I\1V.r III,, - _ _ _ __- _ _ _ • - _
a 1 I I,,,, ,1,,,, „ , . . .� u. J I II III I jr , _ _ I „ r`c:: -- - - .'" ` " -_-_
I, .,Wy� UT2 Rifle Trib.-Old-Bus -_ I' ,I ,\\''i,l" --I ,q,n',II'I ul''J'0' '.is;-.,t"':.:_ --- - , , \ /
' _4 cr '- -I I, I I „I ,,,,I,'6,,,, �_ \. ,/rl,lr, `, .�'-=_==' F - - 1 i - -=
I ,
I I ,
,h I I I,I Li4 - _
, ,, , \„ ,'.'------- •' '---"-- ,-'.,,---=c- `._ Branch,Barn Branch - �I I '-
, I I ,, ,,, n , •, Nol1.h Ittle'Huntm Creek 1 ,,// ` '`,' `'` -- . - 1 �/�
g SHEET 3.2 `;`, • p
I I - --
- s4o cut
�1� I A '
8G UT1 Reach 3 J - -
I -
{
IIP - - 2090 Fill -�`�,
rli '',' - - -
\III - __ _ _
- - 1550CFIm ort -
\ 18280 Cut iI - - - P I „i.%'%;%'
q /, III, I ,
•
WILLIAM JODY GRAY I t1\; (' `,S ----- - '- \\ 1,
9 II "
/
I
,
I `
,i
0.B.1087 PG.105 I nl „ .IMP. 3680 Fill 1 ,`, „ „ „-, ,I ,r' �i' - - - -- - - „/,,;'•,�
m , III„ \ „�„�+`.=• ,;-,1-„ , „ '„'"./' >± - _-- - - _ • \ \ \1 ,,II ,;,;;,,
.
I 'w „n' \, '.7dt1j it =- �` r`�`"„ \ \ 1 itl/i
„r „ r r. , ,i/ ", „•/r'-',:: a.l ', ____-_ III
a .a• PIN.4827-75-8017 rrr,,, „II„I„r ----- - -
\ 14600 CF export `' ,r' r '/ - ----- ;,
JJ ,,
9 \, _�5
.
h
1 I1 Q
x
N F'1 - 6,
n ::b" 11` r
STABILIZE EXISTING FA�M POND o
/r, -
1
/ JERRY A. y; '1% /
:r �/ 1 /
I -
,3\
''I' - I O
" ./ and "-'
i
\
\_.
'a / ,SEE SHEET 3.2 -
sI
- DEBRA LYNNIOHNSON .�.
,
;,; Jrl I f D.B.0653 PG.160 '1`,0 '/„ -�s'a'g:=-=-%:._" =__-_-_'t - - —
S/; - PIN:4827-84-8574 - -_ - -- -
- � ,/, - _ `mac=\\,..
'-ram - - --- - -
J/' `faglail Ham," "r _ -- - -_ -_ - - - - - - _ -
iir =_,ram,,,,,,','i,/;,�'/i:.-:-�_ - - _ ?sue - _ _
HORIZONTAL M _ - - - - - - '-
%i',ii"III Z� _ // /.,/ J,!i�i'p�\�'�'., y,, _ "_ - _ _ _ _ _ _
/ ' I I
,,,I l___ _ _ -:__ _ ::ifs- ___ _"-__ _ — _ _ _ __ _
I\ - y.y - - _ rye _ _ _ - _ _ _

-
_ i''' (4�'
/ - 0 11@L -__- __-_- __ ___=11 ---- -• --_ _ -__ - 0' 20' 40' 60' o
!RETAIN EXISTING CULVERT ;6� - _ - `, - _ - - - _--_c -- --- Z,
- -- - -__- ----- - ------- __ --- z
' _i1 --__ ._--- HORIZONTAL _
P PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT -, --- (HORIZONTAL)
c•`
_--- -_-,--- -__--_-- I g)dI I 11
1 i
1
N
S'
w
\
r ;
110.-. //= ,,-=- . ;`�; r: ,G it N - rl � ----- _- �b '�\ --- -- ___--11zs _------- ------------- -- - --- ------ ---- ----- _
,le,,_,,_, cp
,1
,
_! ;:, wi'� ,y'! 11 L% • 120 = 1125 ':'"
i
N H E 11 --
-- is'- ORT- 'LITTL HUNTING EEK _11zo.''
{
m p -
,,'s %l' (" `---G G �' �; ) \ ;'II.I i �' 110+00 •�? 3i�Q%;; ,. _ - -- --r- P--- �-
Y •'I ' `_= '�� i ( ,�; }(.''<2 1"` 0 _ =" '_'bGU - _-----v4434 _REMOVE EXISTING FENCE'��_
= `\V L R J ,. ' 12+0 ----- --_ -_: W3f-- --------- -- j
- J. {; �'j;-,>� -------' .://i.__=- �� ,'f:�: as binu� —VW3�. VW3j�_ d \n/ITHINEASEMENT
vs:s._g;
t_.
•
"'`•��(�EN �� �'-� " �"' ° r ;;'"; m ,`/ m �• • ,.. `' NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK, 111s 111s �,z ;__ ��
_a „Aire"' •/ _ •``___ •% !•I �, ♦• _ -- --_ _- t
-�N•`,, /, "Q.� �.. �,-, M`�_�.� �" \1' --`-` -__-.. /_� _ lk\.=mac -- ---! 1i,i+�712•:• _ �-- -- `t {_" --- _ ii T 115+00 ��iG:;�"-- - -- __ _ _ t 0 _-.... -.
:, / ��//-ppr ��„,: 'AA4i J ..8+00- 9 r ^ t t _.-v••__ • • Ns G------ �•'i 1115 } �'"' - == r �►�►�118x `'=:t...._.
1 •
' _ -[i v ' ���Z '. e t - - - O •Crt 1115 -�1i� - -- - - --_" -_-- _ I110 x0♦ ',keg. _
'=- _ C`.//;.o1x 'n 1e.�r` 0�/ _ \ 1'. Yr _ p.1110 �..rti wf'\;3'•_- - ��� Op a,
a.%�i?i`..tj/ r,r,r� .�f�:=� �' �� i �"PS�:.�. •09x - _ __ :, - .111+00.'/ - •,,,,I,N _=t'�• '`._ y' -�'�' •t__.�'�`�_- "�
,
rel. �!I. r^n / __ -sir"-d=..,1 �P':L,i`. ��-':1115 - o ',:es-.. a�i.; _ y�,;x x1r; __ - A� --- i�w �•L10'.i�n�'-,r 0..- =/ - 10 _ __�\-
05+00 _ :4 n� - - _ 1115.= - ram: ,��__= - i- - �.: - _-�, O .F= _ .. --••/.: �:n_ ,,- �.. - '1_ \.�'.111 ♦ot- \ .,,1,t
1 = �, 1>y* _ J'== ',� `'_ __ -- _•.:a.,' f=` i.�' - o l _-p ° :ice -..-`" s-az / O f,T.`
V. 120 h _ e_i •4•• -- 1 , >. �.*-4: .,;ii- -_- _ �,a 111p' =1110} e_ - i \�R ' /!fit` `�. - /—
L _- - - '�IRi - - I ��+:s .1�/, • �__ - -,ry.��p�y� •:y. ' [ -Ey. �,,. �£ :��. f1 ,'/ ��S- ♦�, '�. /!� �' �•?'�'-1110� �-.:•.a'""."...,-';�v
_- fv _ i,_•-1115;'=j `` ;ti\,{ -- -t - r' - ai..i-
�, \ ;ter___ , ls_ `'\ !♦ •
oW _ ':i- �qi f y; - _-- _ - 1'', -111 --__- - `♦�•::=r�,vc.\, � ,`f• �f obi" x00` �� •��I / �I '---
/=_ J," ��,j`s 'i '. .✓ �" m - `11111515 ' '��., y1 i f^`� 3 is' \16xp� -
m CE� -X �'. `v.. i
11�0, =_ _ ,w G � _ O • E:-`WIC �� C• .. 'f 5�'�:. ✓ r DRAIN TILES
S.
115- 15 r�Q /, C '/ 2 ..t•.i pis;:."• i _ .'%`'��i �•` - �. CEO WITHIN THE
1 11 rig\ i i i .,\�tl,4 S V S:%Z.. 1 1� \O♦i��s•:• _C
CONSERVATION
`!::`�1ii_a:�L-r '�'- �/E - I I\on')•� .� 3 1S,/ ,'1y• ` ' EASEMENT WILL
•?' �J' :,I; ___---- F' "� '�" r EXCAVATED. I F T
11 CE
10"0' L J, I ;`° -- 7715 1...�0 ,�..r -- .. I,Iu. Aue AW. Aue ;DRAIN TILES
;,�� - _ E/ ; ��) 1/ r`E ,a,. .� EXTEND BEYOND N
oi
`'�S,,,M1,l , / . , '� CON O��„y � CONSERVATION O
CE�C ,`/ �� 1'� L / EASEMENT,AN (�
,,I,,/, „ - .112 _ �`,',14 / _ % ��. WILL BE PLACED F bA 1
GF' "� -"/ IIII
- ,iw. ,uv. ,iw. I
_` _ .'9 \,k\,'vg; � AL AL AL AL A,. AL AL ALL. -_----- - - - - - WITHIN THE
,
2`
S;
,•,. '' --- _ - Aue Aue AL AlAu,. Aw. Au,. Au,. - - -
„
♦\ ,FF \M 1 7 /. Aw. Aue -ym.- '•!� a,,_"'FE-EASEMENT TO
• CAPT
'x! _ -- - ---- 1I+141', o. Aw. >�e 'fl Au,. Au,. AW. Au,. ,uh. Au,. Au,. -i / - _- URE AND STIE .,�
—_- _ _" - __ „n FILL UT21EXISTING CHANNEL o -AY AW. _ +�
-- - -- -"------ ',4'(� + Au G 'i -/ - _ THE FLOW.
_
---= -' /,Y;;/' /;'_' - _ - "" ,.1115�AI'r- , = _
m O
---- --- %/,,, __ ,"--_ - Aw. AW. Au,. Aw. Au,. Au,. Aw. AI¢ Au,. Au,. Au,. -
_
ul
, /, , , -_.,_ :j:;\ III - 'I' -"/
L ~
T
F
' - - - 'fircy) +�
Aw-Aw
1
^
--------_ „/, •, _ , ., , , A A1c AIL .A L AIL Ale. AIe. - __-
.ill'• -
7' Ir
„!ley _ _ _
,lh
AL,. AW.rl AW. AIL.` - - _ _ _
'Ale - �
_ 11l m - _ _ _
'li f _
_-- 'I' Alle AW. - '
;1� AIS- AL. A4 '
Ale _ _ __ _
AI "'1` \ ,Ile - - - - _
,-Ale - -
Ale --
„
E -
Ale -
A4 _
I Al A4_yL. Ale -
.FE � _
r -
Al- ,\``, Ale
Ale
Ale - -
Ale - -
Alc - - -
_ ``vla AL./ ,`\'1i „Ale _ _ _ ___ __ _
---- - = r I 11l' STA:312 06 --_" -'' - -_ _ ---- - -- - rs''Ls'T
_[
' ,111''l l'`,` UT2 Ale Alc _ - - - - -- --
-- - - -- -- - / \ 11 ,\, 1 � S ;,; ill(`
\ t `\ END REACH 3 RESTORATION x � � - _ - _ __ _
• _ ,
�I_
- - - BEGIN REACH 4 RESTORATION - _
\ ,lie -
'\1',','it"' - `�
,
_ - ilii' ,
a
_ -
- STA:282 89
',1
•
\, END BARN BRANCH i � nr:
--_ --^_ '`- ``_ �, :; `____�• �; ' /i =-- -- _`�
' ---- `I I\\,11g1 ` \ -
"" •', I - �;il•_/ BARN BRANCH CONFLUENCE ;I' I I 'I
,
\
m
'I
i' `
l', If
"O' I- I 1
__ ___ _ ______ _ '/ i 1' i 1 i ,1 I I / 1 _
JJ 'll
_ 1 _- -_ v '11
y�l 1: i it ' +'
od
il'
tli il`'' I''�'` N' 1 1
1 1' � _'1'
i M
E -
I
,ti
1 I ' \N
• ti %n 'v r
11, ' ''m
- - m w
-- - il`'i' I' il '1
U
- I
1 _ 'f 1
I \1`�\ ,li` ili ili IC:c!IPAW. - I, '1 I' l' 1 1 \ 'S' U
v 4:7—- l li'i' .Mlle'' 3.-:'. \ 1 1' I'I , ' 1; I \
(�, / \',1,;,,/1,{ 11'I 1 i ;n' 'ZZ5'' � 1 •`�, I I I \ I I 1 \ `
- ,\\ ' Z '1.' 1I,' I ',� Ili :��1112'. \ O I '( i ' i 1 I \` 1 _,1'„ r7
fIi"
ti - 1 -
1 \ p 1 - P]
' 1 \I ' I
\t1 ,I,n
1,Jle'SE4 I � /
a 1 - w
h''1
I \\1, 1
��" � w I• I
2 W
''lll1l\ -
'I
1 AW AW 1`
'Il'
Aly
_ 1
it � - 1
- - I
`1
Iii' - \
1 E 1 ''an 1 , 1'`'%/, 111'1 �y'i:i
( Ale.=__
AW'-AW
, /
i
- 'N II'
\
, lip \\\
z
3
` /
'l i.
'•
`
'I-1
',
X ,'/ i/ i pr
\
'''/' c o` a •n
I
l`x
t
� J

'NC
0 2' 4' 6'
C , \ \ , \ „„ „,../ —',„_,, ',„ ,--, " —
CI) 8
2 ,°2
P, \\\\ \\\\„\„\ \"•,'11, \ \ \\\\\\‘`,''':1-,:\M \'I,\\\\ \\\\1 \ / / ''' ''''', \ s---\ \ ,----------— \‘` '---\----j ''-------' 'N\ NN N'„ 0 20 40 60'
z 1 PA
\\\\\ AIMI, ,\\I Irrca; \ \ , j „%; \\ \ ,„
s,
, ,‘ - , \ \, \ \ e. ------ , - ---. ,----- -,-; , • \ \
HO \ IC—i\ \ \ \ '''„
. -
\r----
1/L -
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '1 1 \ \ \ 1 1,1,, \'1\',./ ::-,:z :_ ',-,‘,',-,,;:• :•, •„',„'',„ \---- ----- ',.
r'----
N . --•--• ‘•
\ S' ' , ..--,- • •
/;''2:: ':•‘ '37;/ ‘ -'‘,,
' n ' \ ; " 11 \ 1 :H1,: i111 : 1HHIlli±.'"- ------- ::'2•1'::-- '.-: ::'„ '11, I] 1‘,
\ ' ‘
r
‘,/
.-,--- ,____
I 11(//) \\)1 11\\),\ I\\\) 1‘Ci SI..AS::'\S' '''''':. \‘SS2S:•2222 ,\'1\'''„\‘• '\
e ',/' 3 ,:• \;t2:----:a:':,: :•''''' ,\\ \‘, N\ N\
:-::',;2
IQ
\,
, li„ 1 : 1 : : : IIIIII:111:////) :1111 ,j1 - ' , ''„ ,.‘ /.‘,7'',':•: ":-...: ',.,• .,‘•• •••• „ 1•//'
re-„., / -/
I I 1 I 1 1 i i;;21 il ////)) I A- \ '‘'l' /1 '') '''''::\ ° .':)1 \''.:‘ ,. .S. "\ \.• r „ele"' I /
•
V; : ' i/ 1 : : I 74;;:;;:I 1 I‘-'1 I I I/j// 'r r:'''''' ''''i'l• ----r, '7 A <,, "11_„,'''''1.-TST-''' ','-- -*‘• s\ s
„, •,
il i/ 1 ) Hilijilliiii111////'
N/ 7/ /if,:j1j;k11111,;,L,11,L1117/ / \
I li /11jj i 7 (\ e _.r ''',:,\7",''„\ •!.;5:\' •',•\\N-- ‘1 t
•,,, \\\\\,,,
.. ,
ej __="---' N•L2' \ s'tt-'' S''.'2:'-'':','\-Sn'‘''':'''•', L--‘1, -'s„\ ////' .-------.
•,,,, .....'- ',, \‘‘
•
,//),,),1- — -- s., .- , , --, , ,„„\\,\„\„
, , ,
. ...,
:,,,-;;;,- --,„ \„\\ /1 ,,
,-
, .
// ,' -- _c?'„,---,,
, •
,,, \
,•/ / _ -----------
--- - --------' '---sx•- l'-11 ,V,'s,\:\I, i '') ,
• „'•
,------ -------- - ,,, \\ \ i \ -','';';- EXISTING FARM POND----
--- ----- • - cu
.-f.------------ \ ' Vr'' Y 1,',\\:\‘‘‘,s‘s;•‘:\, \ \,, /(:, \'',------- ---; -- _ ,' ..-- .-
,-- .-- ( ,•'' .7)
/ •;••;,/,/ r
‘ „-- ..
• O
--. "\sz---„___ _— --
s \ /
;-1
' \, ,'— •rl
i `--
rt
I \'\-:1A,(,I , 71 \_17,
55
„ ‘qltsilM ' V ,, \ , ) / i --E ;-8
11:1::/,;/, ,:'::;,',2/1/,/,/,',11111>,2•,),',1;r0;2
,----,
----_____
-------- -----\ i \'• \ ,1 s',. i 21'::-Iri\, : ,\" - - -C-, / ,-----"71 --------/ t -2 ''
LAY BACK BANKS3 1
STABILIZE WITH MATTING
___ 6°- \i .‘,
,_ F7 o (._)
_------ • .,.. .\\ C "-',,\ /,';, -tc-„1-k:\x'eti::1_,:_-:,,i-cr-f-,.;-,f-,:-/\-- " / ,,--/ / '-',
\ \ \ ('\,',-----\,),, l _iS1-----: rf : ,,,) / ,_.--• t———1,,' '' 8 _ ,
•(/,';',/„/4.62,/,/:-',),•-',--",'6/\ i
1\‘• s .‘,„ \i'l-, --: ,, i ,•--- / ,„/ ,_,/
\,,, -,,i0sis\,\.'--,-222=,-_-\-1 ss.z,_\\•2\2---- - __---------
' \ •,--.=--,, SS, 'er,-/' '/ //--j / ,/---' // r / +:1 S 4
cn
,,,,v;, x\-c \,1,y, ,, ,,, -226s,___ ,,:„ -,„,„, __ ,.,
) A.> s,/,/ i -
rt
__--- i, 1 7_,,,,.., -IL,71__ ,,,, ..
1 1 L'
__------
‘,,•;,,,P,ip, \4t ,
vs\•\,':', ,,i--,, \ 'ik-') N
i /) ,--,--•,-\,k\\,,\'1, \`'"--, 'Ss,-
WIDEN EXISTING FARM ROAD
----,----' ,---i---:--2,--,_---:,-;:-•-r--',2-,/ ,/ ,„•-- „/" „--' ,/
,-•
`-2---_--__,--:-_, \ ‘ -;•'.'-'-,\, \
=7'• '\: ;..--:-.•: :,.' -==,\ci: _ •J ____,_, _z______
11-- —- /----;:::-_::::--; •--, /,-------,------ ----- ,„/ Pi „„/ ,,•„/ ,••/' ,•'„' -/ ---"„ ----
.--', --",__--;--- --;;=_- - --- -=';:- /,/,------ „/" ,,,•• ,,' ,...,,,, „, ,,,• ,„, ,,/ ,,,- ,,,--
,•
,••
-_--------i"------':::'="1,-;-=- --- ::::--- „„ , / ,, ,, ,, / „,• „- .,
,, — , , ,• ," , ," --
,• ,• „ , , ,
" •
( \ \\.\--\-7 ''••:•'.•:\:\------2-1-- :::'-----c--_-_ -.,c.---_- _,_:,' _,-';,-;,,, , i L•'" ____-/,/ ,-,---__-_-=:;„ ' , f"\--\k‘; '-, 'N., '''--, °'•, '--„ ''\;\'-" ,•----------------, •:_-:-.:--":-_-;,----:1:-'-=' ;-_- --,:::---
/ ,•• ,•• ,/ ,•• / „, ,,,, ,,••,- ,, , ,, ,- ,• ,•
,, „„, , , „ ,
,• ,,, „„
( / / t-, ''s, 1 ---) ,----.' -",•---:-. -'11-e--‘;_,--,,:' .,,i- ,,,,----•-•, _ -, ----,\--___-_-_„ , • -, ---=,-=:--,-,:-- -" .----- „, „,..- ; .„ • -„
•
— -...
,
,
,
,
i • ‘• s‘, \ --. •-•., -., .„... -,. -,„ •••„ ..‘„ ,•,,, x, ,„ ,______ , .
PJ=3'0
,-1 ss, s„ ,„ --__ •.„ „„ „„_ „„ •,_ „...... -,-, -,.. -,._ .,.. -,..
, „
,•,,,,,, N
,, , \ s,‘, „,, .,„ ,,,, ,,,,
—____
z,2
g g. -, g. g.‘ ...__
Pot Cr)
21
gg-
A.
\_

/ V 1
cA
P.
4 a t � E'U,
� w
w 1zz
Open Riparian Buffer Planting Zone Streambank Planting Zone Q G o 0
Buffer Planting Zone Buffer Planting Zone I w o f5 F'a
X• : Open/Graded Bare Roots Streambank Planting
Wetland Wetland
Indicator See Detail 3,Sheet 6.5 for Indicator
Species Common Name Max Spacing Indio.Spacing Min.Caliper Size Stratum #of Stems Status Species Common Name Max Spacing Indio.Spacing Min.Caliper Size Stratum #of Stems Status
Live Staking instructions on
Platanus occidentalis* Sycamore 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 20% FACW streambanks. Streams>8'Bankfull
Betula nigra* River Birch 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 15% FACW Width
Salixnigra Black Willow 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 25% OBL
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 10% FACU
Note: Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 20% FACW
Prunus serotina Black Cherry 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 10% FACU
OPTIONAL TRANSPLANTS to be Salixsericea Silky Willow 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 25% OBL
used at Engineer's discretion Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 10% FACU
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 15% FACW
for streambank and floodplain Ulmus americana* American Elm 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 5% FACW
planting. Acer negundo* SubcanopySombucus canadensis Elderberrry Sft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 15%
9 Boxelder 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" 5% FAC
Oxydendrum arboreum* SubcanopyUPL Streams<8'Bankfull I
xYSourwood 13 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" 5% Width
Diospyros virginiana* Persimmon 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 10% FAC Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 25% FACW
Asimina trilobo Pawpaw 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Shrub 5% FAC Salixsericea Silky Willow 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 35% OBL
Quercus alba White Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 5% FACU Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 10% FACW
*Species to be planted in wetter portions of the site 100% Elderberrry canadensis 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 15% FAC
**Canopy species only are subject to monitoring height requirements. Alnus serruloto Tag Alder 8 ft 2-8 ft 0.5"-1.5"cal Shrub 15% OBL
Plugs
Juncus effusus Common Rush 5 ft 3-5 ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb 40% FACW
Carex lupulina Hop Sedge 5 ft 3-5 ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb 15% OBL
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 5 ft 3-5 ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb 15% FACW
Carex crinita Fringed Sedge 5 ft 3-5 ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb 15% OBL
Carex lurida Lurid Sedge 5 ft 3-5 ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb 15% OBL TDI
tt
czt u
•r-
Shaded Riparian Buffer Planting Zone Permanent Seeding
O j
+ + + + + + + + + + + Buffer Planting Zone Buffer Planting Zone � a
Shaded Bare Roots Riparian Seed Mix
+ + + + + + + + + + + Note:
Wetland Wetland ry '�
++++++++++++++++++++++ Permanent Riparian seeding in r6
Indicator Indicator ,—I
+ + + + + + + + + + + Species Common Name Max Spacing Indio.Spacing Min.Caliper Size Stratum** #of Stems Status all disturbed areas within Species Common Name Stratum Density(lbs/acre) Status --i
++++++++++++++++++++++ Platanus occidentalis Sycamore CanopyConservation Easement
Y 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" 15% FACW Ponicum rigidulum Redtop Panicgrass Herb 1 FACW CP
O
Betula nigra River Birch 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 15% FACW Chasmanthium latifolium River Oats Herb 1 FACU � r ,
ft
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 5% FACU Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Rye Herb 3 FACW v
Carpinus caroliniano SubcanopyDeertongue iS—.I, 6
P American hornbeam 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" 5% Dichonthelium clondestinum g Herb 3 FAC
Diospyros virginiana CanopyI-0 4
PY 9 Persimmon 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" 5% FAC Sorghostrum nutans Indiangrass Herb 3 FACU
Acer saccharin um Silver Maple 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 5% FACW Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem Herb 2 FACU
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 5% FAC Panicum virgatum Switchgrass Herb 1 FAC
Euonymus obovatus American Strawberry Bush 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Shrub 3% FAC Rudbeckia hirta Blackeyed Susan Herb 1 FACU
Calycanthus floridus Sweetshrub 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Shrub 2% FACU Bidens aristosa Showy Tickseed Sunflower Herb 1 FACW
Hamomelis virginiana Witch Hazel 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Shrub 5% FACU Helianthus angustifolius Narrowleaf Sunflower Herb 0.6 FACW
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 10% FACU Coreopsis lanceolate Lanceleaf Coreopsis Herb 1 FACU
Fagus grandifolia American Beech 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 5% FACU Chamaecrista fasciculata Partridge Pea Herb 1 FACU
Quercus alba White Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Canopy 10% FACU Heliopsis helianthoides var.helianthoides Oxeye Sunflower Herb 1 FACU
Lindero melissifolia Spicebush 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Shrub 5% OBL Juncus ten uis Path Rush Herb 0.4 FAC
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood 12 ft. 6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0" Subcanopy 5% FACU 20
**Canopy species only are subject to monitoring height requirements. 100%
3
Pasture Seeding
f.
Disturbed areas outside easement.
2. Pasture Seeding
cl
' ' ' ' ' Pure Live Seeding(501bs/acre)
F ' ' ' ' Wetland
' X X X X Indicator c
Species Name Common Name Density(Ibs/acre) Status
E Doctylis glomerate Orchard Grass 33 FACU
m w U E
= Trifolium pretense Medium Red Cover 5 FACU ry U
2 Trifolium repens White Ladino Cover 5 FACU r* o O
Poepratensis Kentucky Bluegrass 7 FACU
w
gg
w
A E '272 m
v z 9
, 1
x` ^ O c O U vg,

I
\ V 1
N
hii
NSHEET4.2 F� 4II N
\ d0 00}
N
N N
. a.
z ‘. z
\ / , / S 'S�D
o� z z z z •
z�, z Q.J� N izi<<,�'izz .
. z z 4 z z\v,z z r„..‘ z • �
. ''''''''\ . - ., z N 90 , zz `\\zzz zzz ` ,
z' o� �--- Ark
N :: zz�� zzz ; zz �P
z�'� i �� z z A�z /yko<^x,„ ,, •
z` z y � •a'i ; zz s zz .titi�,3ti,, s
N zz zR� ii��. �� zzz,„; zzzzt z ( zz
• , , z
�� e. �` zz \0iz z z !,i
���_ 1.;'v»�7. 11,,•..° „ „„„
�c. zzzz \zz �/ o
, ,., ,, , , \ •.
O\.. `l ...... / 21Sxo .,„_ .,_ \C7 ,^_, z z z z z z z z z ,, z z zy,I zco
�8G / zz� , zz zz zzz wr ,,, z �` ,-7
0 � J . N;, z z% z i z z zA�si, /z z \C i O
1� I __z �� °` z z
zzo+ooIIM Q� U
\ � \ �I .I'I,
,I rI,p ©z z C z �� i z,i •
O O oo z �1, zzz '� zzz O bfJ
GF ' 'I' 'I' '�i z z z310+00,, ,_ zzzz , z
I i1,y0 6j 1 � - U
• ri So0
II I;I I I I I I I I �i' •
, •• -.9`d90 zzz zzz '�49./_ \ l/
n j'I'.I.I .I. .I. p II' III : p z z z ,z ; O0 (t
cn
p 'I' I'I' I'b I I I I'I CAI,
��y / zzz /`' z E
'I'I 'I' ,I, I,I,'I \ d -,yam z 4
'''..,,:sp4it, ,
/, &N. „ 7
o
,7
J w 4.,_pi
To
So
o
C,
/ /
vz
7
E / m�
U O
•
P]
0' 200' 400' 600' \ 7 w _
(HORIZONTAL) ` 7 E
/ 2 Z 3 0 1
` \ / �❑ _.a ❑ U

..1
cA ,
N
z .
, zz , zzz....\
N 0 ct,-01 8
1— , gr5H,zd
. .
zzzz • zzz /
zzzzz zzzz \
zzz z •, -, zz • .
• zzzzz zzzz
zzzz zzzzz
.---)
N
, zzz zzzzz .
•, zz " zzzzzz
1, .....\
• .
•, zz ,, zzzzzz
, zzz ,, zzzzzz‘,.. ....
0z z •, 00zzzz
z z z •, zzzz -
--\
•, zzzz zzzz -, 4 \ ‘..7".\,<•."'
/
S/t,/ \
• Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ', \ 4713.L...
ON
\
•< ', Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ,
/ \
/
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
/
N
N. ', Z ZO-'1 "7"-Z Z , Z Z Z •
0 /
/
t_ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
/
/ •<<)//
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
•
\. . 0 " /0 C)<<' •11
zzzzz zzz ,, 44s, / •.
-........„,„_.,
0
, 0 ,
/ 0
•. ct
z z z....: 411kv. z z •, -I—
zzzzz - zzz * 42.,
\
b-C)
-,.. zzzz , zzzz
N
(//// / ,0,‘ «, •—i ,_
, -1—
' zzz zzzzz •
0
, , zzzzlizzzz \ \
zzzzz , zzzz ,,,,„„ \ //c)(0`
\\
H
zzzz , zzzzz . •C"
, .
''''\ - zzzzz • ..zzzz .
zzzz • 8zzzzz ',."
.., zzz • RIzzzzzzz <,.,
cr) S
0
7 ft
\ • o z z z z o '" z z o o z
E 6
. ., ,,,,•,.
.„,
„. „ „ „..... •,,„ , ,--
, „ „ „ -, , „ „
\
.yo
,, ,........
4" \ _ ,tzzzzz zzzzz • .,7,,,, \* c'-\4
• z z z • __,...z l'Af.
- z z z z z z "/ •' .'•:lb:::---;--'4'''1::4.4:°'il'4'liFir:7::-/C):31: -- .......\° s 1\.",,,,,Oe./ - , zzA46•1! -‘?"izzzzzzzzz7l1F,, ..
0/
.1 % • jew140, zzzzzzzzz z
// & _. ,, ' / ,, 0 •; 00 ,... •)•°\'\'/
• •
4., izzzzzzlikt\N„.zzzzzz",zz ,,
."-„,,,, ,,,,,..,,,,,, •
Ade : zzzzzzzz
6r, '100 00 °&,(• 0 /
N 'N'N,
N 0
'......f zzzzzzzzzz •, --....,, ,,, ,,,,
0 <,,
-10,, OU OU
v /
/ °
Z ' / Z Z
cl I
NN-N:NN,e cP's. / #
ot/ o& 0
= \ 06.- ,.,..,
\
,--1
LW
Al... //
Fp oo /
E ell 'if
Aff
AO'
2 6)0 N N
0 0 N
----...,,...,. , 0 N 0 Ay >„8
& •))0 .it
/ , .=
°
/ OC/e N
„ NN,., / /
.'.H. 0 (:) .-4,..„, .71'1
/ P,
0' 60 120 180' 0- ''°C) ,
7-: ///° &<<' 'o \ / . ,r,
L• (HORIZONTAL) <R,
•N i '1T9. '''E•
/
N o&e o&N

/ 1-v.-
cl
z cn
Q
Z(90
W U r
t .1
1w
�z�
Q6
31
INGLE HOLLOW RD ,� I
zmN
�� p �� — — R/W MATCHLINE SHEET 4.2
n
RYW—
OO � , , , , „ i „ . , , , '.. Riw �f
c RAW / [C,
i % , , , , ,1 , , %zzzozzL0���O % 0 ' 0z' z' ' "
m w / /• ',0 / 0 2z / / %�/ � 0zZ22z l� 2z2 ' 'zzzozz/'/ zz Z2 z ZZ 2Z // zzZ2 / / / //% • p/ /p'
' %% , , , , , , , O , , , , , / / , , , , , '/, , /11 i , , , ' , , , , , /, , , / , , , , , /, , , , / , , , , , /, , / , / ,,, , , , , , , , - •- , , , ,j " , , ,
RTH LIT
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
czt
i , , 000 , , /mil., , , , , , , , , , , / / ; , , , , , , , , ,' 000000,, , „ , � 0 0 , , , , , , , , 0 0 , , , , , , , , , , , / 0 0 , , , , , , , 0 0 , , , , , , , , , , , / / 0 0 0 , , , , i ,400000000000
0, 00000
, , , , , , , , , , , , " „ .' � ' , , , , �i/ , , , , ,4000, 00
�� /, / / / " , , , , , , , /„ / / / " , / " , , ,� +34 " / /�c 00: , , Yam + •. ct
„ Y, , , ' /+ ;-I 5
, , , � , , , , , '.;may � , , , , , , , , , '- „%/ % , , , , , „ ..
NtIONICIRIBIWS, • ,0 0 1 '
�� �_ � , , , , ,�_l�` / 44 / I Wiz , , ,
I
„ ' c \ , , , , , 0000 ct
0
/ gainklUK , , ,000/ -.
I O I —
/ / / / /, p / I
rn o MATCHLINESHEET4.4 I
, ,
3
N
m W U P
Q x OM'
o
Pg
gj
W
E kg
tm az no a o u
^180'60' 120'0' (HORIZONTAL)
X

/ 1-NE'
z
Q
Zoo
.31., mU w
.w
� �
z d a
�w
I
I
���% z I% % / zz ', I� ' zzzz
% zzz \', z mh % zizz zzz MATCH LINE SHEET 4.3
A:\s_v_
---7
p % zzzzzz zoo -,,0 zzzj zzzz (� zzzzO % I c w • ` , zz , zzz \ / / // \ lc , / � oo , zzzzzz o / / zzz II
%
�` zzz ' zzzzozjz 'o l
me , �; zzzil, zzzzzzzzII L. % z z3Zp zzz3l10 3l0— 310 zc�occo
Q
•
zzizzzzzz z �" I O zzzzzzzzzz .. z IzQ�z zzzzzz - ct/ zjzzzizzzj , I U zjzzzz ` z b�p ' iiizzzzz zzzzj ozozjzzzjzz zzzz I +�tizzz� zzzzzzzz / „ zjzzzzzzzzz Iz „ zzzzzzzz , „ 00 Z
•Ct 3-1
00000, zzozo
(Vzjzjzzzzzzzzzzz / \zzzzz , , , / izzii E Hzzzz zzzz , zz / zV , , zzzzz —i—z / (t zzzzzz iz z . zzi fzVzzzzizzzzzz / i zzzzzz / % zzzzzz . ,,Vzzzzzzzzzi i % zzj ,' \ ' z % CISD BUS BRANCH zzzzzzi % " ' � OL 1 Uzzzzzzzz zzz zj„ „ zzzzz / Czzzjzzz n zzzzzzzz z� I cn/ / ' ' zjzzzzz zz � ,
z0000
0/ / / / / / z 1 S0/ / / / 5k� zzzz „as:p zzz zzzzzzzz , zzzzzz / 0z ,' ;� Izjzizii ' z,L',- , % zzzzzzzzzzz , I z ., zzz " zj '
•
� Iz , zz ' zzz%zzzi 'syzzz , , ,ff /
z �y zzzz �zz -
���� z '� zzzz , ,
z z -C
z / / / I
zzz I', z
zzz •—, zz
z z z
zoo, z z
zzzz V ,
zzz > z z z
— — — — z z %/zz
z
• zzzz (' zoo '
02
ci
uo, zzz z , zz r,¢xu, /zzzz0 I zzzz
:+::.+++r ,_ ,_ ,_
z z i w_ � _ _ zz E— 11 o + + d
rn
cu— — I180'60' 120'0' (HORIZONTAL)v

C SEE PROFILE �e.,
P, - FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE - 3"TO 6"DIAMETER WOODY LOG EXPOSED 1"TO 3"ABOVE 3"TO 6"BRUSHY MATERIAL
B DEBRIS WORKED INTO RIFFLE FINISHED RIFFLE ELEVATION BURIED INTO ROCKY SUBSTRATE
�' SUBSTRATE TOP OF BANK
MICRO POOL HABITAT TOE OF SLOPE Q m
BEHIND LARGER WOODY DEBRIS Z 0 ry m
Z ����
W .U R w
HEAD OF RIFFLE tl< w „2
SALVAGED ON SITE z o
�}�}�}�}�}�)�}�} - 1 4AVAWAVill COBBLE/GRAVEL C�0 °`�
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION - .. :�LVAGED ONSITE BED MATERIAL EMBED/BURY INTO BANK 3'MIN /1 Z o H a
POINT PER PROFILE RIFFLE BOTTOM COBBLE/GRAVEL D50 MIN: �'w "'
A ,a a a a a a a a a a, A.
• •�: •:�: •:�: •:�: •:� f WIDTH PER BED MATERIAL D50 MAX: Section B-B'
TYPICAL SECTIONS D50 MIN:
FLOW Section A-A' D50 MAX: SEE PROFILE
,,.•- »�������� + FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
TOE OF SLOPE(TYP)
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION POINT PER PROFILE
POINT PER PROFILE B I
TOP OF BANK(TYP) A ASALVAGED ONSITERIFFLECOBBLE/GRAVEL Plan ViewBBED MATERIAL D50 MIN:
D50 MAX: RIFFLE BOTTOMF �
WIDTH PER
a �'' •
FLOW TYPICAL SECTIONS —� • 1 / J ' ' 1 •SALVAGED ONSITE ,• •� C •y•� I� ��a",� 141 r-' A :•.: �'� TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
COBBLE/GRAVEL RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILEi -7 &I i PI►Ili � aMoa POINT PER PROFILE
C Vc '� J-.[ '-F MIN. L -Jir i •1 r��:a S l f ra r�iriMil
BED MATERIAL
<:7 DSO MIN: <</ /;TOE OF SLOPE(TYP)
TOP OF BANK(TYP) � ��
D50 MAX: A.
TOP OF BANK(TYP)
Profile A-A'
, . ,
B'
,\ MICRO POOL HABITAT
BEHIND LARGER NOTES:
WOODY DEBRIS Plan View • WOOD SHALL COMPRISE 20%TO 50%OF THE RIFFLE SURFACE
Section B-B'
AREA.
• WOODY MATERIAL SHOULD NOT PROTRUDE GREAT THAN 3" ct
ABOVE RIFFLE BED. CJ
• BRUSH SHOULD BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL AT ,__I
Constructed Riffle Woody Riffle UP TO A 15%ANGLE DOWNSTREAM. o 0
NOTE: ® ® • IF NECESSARY,SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED
Not to Scale Not to Scale • }� (t
• IF NECESSARY,SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK MAY BE WITH QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE. (�
SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE. • BRUSH CUTTERS OR OTHER DEVICE MUST BE USED TO ENSURE bA
�CR-CR� �CR-WD� --I
PROTRUSION LIMITED TO TOLERANCE NOTED ABOVE. +� y
SEE PROFILE �Oj
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE 1 STONE
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION OR SALVAGED (�
POINT PER PROFILE OR SS ONSITE BOULDERS 8
3 CR-JZ (CR-CH) y6 MIN 0.5'xVx1.5' y
BURY INTO BANK 5'MIN.(TYP) o� TOP OF BANK(TYP) C!�
SALVAGED ONSITE BANKFULL r ,
COBBLE/GRAVEL - A (� U
BED MATERIAL TOE OF SLOPE(TYP) v
FLOW D50MIN: •.gir.•�1 Cn
,� D50 MAX •�� HEAD OF RIFFLE TAIL OF RIFFLE
,' '�) ELEVATION POINT ELEVATION POINT
�1 PER PROFILE
� 4 �1.(®��� " PER PROFILE
Profile View A-A' m N
ROCK TOE TO PROTECT P . B
BANKS ALONG RIFFLE
BURY INTO BANK 1'MIN.(TYP) t2p��
��A�1 CLASS 1 STONE Plan View
LOG STRUCTURE •,■ej' OR SALVAGED
EXPOSED UNTIL ► �yia SALVAGED ONSITE ONSITE BOULDERS SALVAGED ONSITE
CENTER OF CHANNEL '3h COBBLE/GRAVEL MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5' COBBLE/GRAVEL
TOP OF BANK �.:2
��./=��: BED MATERIAL BED MATERIAL
v �� CLASS 1 STONE
•�!•! OR SALVAGED
�TOEOFSLOPEp•�• ROCK VANES MAY
MAnn ONSITE BOULDERS
als �E � ��f) BE USED IN PLACE 3"MAX MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5' RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
�_ ...:tic�.;.;..6:,, o.;.;..o.;. '.,C'3. :<� •e• •� OF LOGS AT �i4'!4 �tiWZII r VARIES PER
• U)� ENGINEER'S DISCRETION TOP OF BANK(TYP)
o I�� o ,_... BASEFLOW
ci Log Section B-B' �
iii��� il
Section A-A• '
.A' c
T Section B-B'
`O� mwU m
NOTES: TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION Pt o x U
E, Plan View POINT PER PROFILE r 2
• STRUCTURES SHOULD VARY IN SIZE AND TYPE WITHIN
•
EACH RIFFLE. ®Ch nky Riffle
• ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR LOGS AT ENGINEER'S ®,JdZZ Riffle
Not to Scale w
NOTE:
72 DISCRETION. Not to Scale -
• LOG LENGTH AND PLACEMENT TO BE CONFIRMED WITH • IF NECESSARY,SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK MAY BE ;
x SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE. =
ENGINEER IN FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION. o s o` u D9

/ V
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
P. HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION POINT PER PROFILE
z POINT PER PROFILE A
3 55°TO 65°
BURY INTO BANK 3'MIN.(TYP) a L (TYP) Q o
THALWEG WA 0 BANKFULL z N
FLOW �,�,d�,j�o TOP OF BANKQ SALVAGED ONSITE We . z
g COBBLE/GRAVEL Ii 091 12"DIAMETER OR SILL ELEVATION PER ,,. a,v,
FLOW En NORMAL WATER BED MATERIAL eo r° 12"-15"DIAMETER LOG -�w 61 2 '2
SURFACE " GREATERE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION \\'1T (TYP) POOL LENGTH PER PROFILE113/ z '�o
POINT PER PROFILE \ 10°-15°ANGLE BACKFILL C� 0
STREAMBED -�z H a
POOL A' FM"
WIDTH Z GL��X POOL DEPTH PER PROFILE
PER 1 ��� ��titi���ti� i0�M` �;
5'MIN NONWOVEN �. TYPICAL SILL ELEVATION � fh 'i✓/✓� �i✓rPP
TYP FILTER FABRIC •e u! SECTION PER PROFILE(TYP)
( I-.����V" NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC OR C125BN
� .^- MATTING AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
Profile View A-A' �� q�e. SALVAGED ONSITE EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
0' 0 Ommaym. COBBLE/GRAVEL FLOW 5'MIN.UPSTREAM
q�'� BED MATERIAL ,"�
N J
Profile View ,,(`7,
O Y BACKFILL OE OF SLOPE TYP
~z
N
,,,m BRUSH TOE OR
TOP OF BANK TOE OF TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION STONE TOE
SLOPE POINT PER PROFILE IAMI= : TOP OF BANK(TYP) _ _ CHANNEL
1- A BOTTOM WIDTH
rdA Plan View
.............. ................ B' ff'•.' � =a
5'MIN. 5'MIN. =ra j: ,,...�. r ,.�..
TYP . . �, TN
,�
(TYP) (TYP) �\� o
Log Section B-B'
I • EMBED LOG SILL ELEVATION 12"-15"DIAMETER LOG
A' 3'(MIN.) PER PROFILE(TYP)
B Section A-A'
Plan View
NOTES:
• LOGS WITHOUT ROOT MASS MAY BE USED ONLY IF cn
APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. ®Angled Log Riffle ®Angled Log Drop
Not to Scale oTDI
• BOULDER MATERIAL CAN BE SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE } \ Not to Scale c-I
OF ANGLED LOGS WITH APPROVAL OF ENGINEER. •i r�
(cR-ALR) •,-i V
g
a0°0 8
cf)
SALVAGED ONSITE SALVAGED ONSITE o
COBBLE/GRAVEL COBBLE/GRAVEL U
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS BED MATERIAL BED MATERIAL E
ANGLED LOG SILL
WITH 1'TO 2'CLEAR SPACE
ANCHORED INTO -I-)r 4
BETWEEN ROCKS. HEADER LOG HEADER LOG
OPPOSITE BANK.
NO GAP BETWEEN FOOTERS TOP OF BANK TYP TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TYP TOP OF BANK
T T T F19eli _ - —. TIWVI T FLDW� _.
INVERT ELEVATION _-
TOE OF SLOPE TYP �. -�_ - INVERT ELEVATIONm, TOE OF SLOPE TYP _ _ __-� ,
PER PROFILE _ EXCAVATE POOLmot� �— PER PROFILE EXCAVATE POOL ���:®�—
FL PER PROFILE • �%, - FOOTER LOG FLOW PER PROFILE FOOTER LOG
SCOUR �•� ,/ SCOUR
POOL =� POOL
PLACE HEADER BOULDER Section B-B' ` ��-_ PLACE HEADER BOULDER Section B-B'
TO PREVENT LOG FROM SHIFTING. ��� A TO PREVENT LOG FROM SHIFTING.
r 20°-30° A r 20°-30
_-�� B SALVAGED COBBLE/RAVEL A' B SALVAGED ONSITE
CM6 �w COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL BED MATERIAL
VANE ARM
3 LENGTH OFFSET HEADER LOG LENGTH OFFSET HEADER LOG
(X) 0.25'TO 0.5'UPSTREAM (X) 0.25'TO 0.5'UPSTREAM
v. OF FOOTER LOG OF FOOTER LOG
3
TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View I •�� ���'� Plan View Own. N—.1irri
HEADER LOG W i HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG —� " FOOTER LOG
E NONWOVEN NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC 'A w u °'
Q O
2 FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC ,,o ^'
EXTENDS S'MIN. EXTENDS S'MIN. '2 ` V
®Log J-Hook IDAll Log J-Hook
Not to Scale Not to Scale P
Section A-A' Section A-A'
A E m m
X v _ ' 9 1
O f..a` O U D9
^

/ V 1
VI
Q
Zoo
INSTALL ADDITIONAL VEGETATION SUCH AS OUTER LAYER 26 OZ/YD' "' .
LIVE STAKES,ROOTED SEEDLINGS,AND ETC. COIR MATTING INNER LAYER 11.2 OZ./YD' ,z o c
COCONUT FIBER BLANKET Q i H
COMPACTED SOIL 12"TO 18"THICK ! "'
LIVE CUTTINGS `\,�S'� � ♦ i
BIODEGRADABLE EROSION r� .� �� • / Inset"A"
CONTROL FABRIC(SEE INSET"A") , ' ...A �♦ / Matting and Blanket
OPTIONAL LIVE FASCINE ♦♦
',\fr,4'
BUNDLE OR2'COIR LOG r / ♦ // 1— COIR MATTING
SECURED WITH 36"STAKES. '✓/// / 2 , �.
:''4 ` \ ` ♦4 = l�j,\� I� OUTSIDE MEANDER BEND /:;,,3,
�„ 7©r©1'®.9NK(®.9NK1'ULL)
BASE N, \ ® // ♦ f\\ UPHILLa,j ��
♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ '♦ v• •>.• ♦♦t#t 'f CHANNELED 1 )
CLASS B/1 RIPRAP
m
ROCK TOE PROTECTION 00
(CLASS B-VARIES PER zo KEY IN BELOW
STREAM SIZE) ;' CHANNEL BED
1 Section View
Section View
NOTES: Typical Stakes
• ROOTED/LEAFED CONDITION OF THE NOTES:
LIVING PLANT MATERIAL IS NOT
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TIME OF 1. VOID SPACES SHOULD BE HAND CHINKED.
INSTALLATION.
• BOTTOM OF FIRST COMPACTED EARTH LIFT CU
TO BE PLACED 6"ABOVE NORMAL
BAMBERO. ®Vegetated Soil Lift ®Rock Toe Protection
• NUMBER OF COMPACTED EARTH LIFTS TO g � '�
VARY DEPENDING ON DESIGN TOP OF Not to Scale Not to Scale 0 s;..1
BANK HEIGHT. < +i (�
U
6"SALVAGED ONSITE
z
C 't C) COBBLE/GRAVEL (t +J
S S BED MATERIAL
~ ~ MIN.12"DEPTH -I--)
O SALVAGED ONSITE HEADER LOG �
m COBBLE/GRAVEL NONWOVEN STREAMBED _ O
N O� BED MATERIAL FILTER FABRIC �1� FOOTER LOG U
a O 11 —A Z a I fir'!
~gligliggliglig } FLOW z 0- `,
•s•s•s••'•'•'•'•• + FOOTER BOULDER m 0 O
CA
�' `' `; ir - -
♦ a O Y -41 EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
•\ ♦♦ ,�♦� O o 5'MIN.UPSTREAM
B B' ..�.��: 1
I A' FILTER FABRIC B Section A-A'
zo°3p•
SILL ELEVATION EXTEND FILTER INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE FABRIC 5'MIN. PER PROFILE
UPSTREAM •'• e e k
Plan View Profile A-A' ��ilk FLOW -
I
/' `+a�'\� HEADER LOG
LIZE VANE
' / FOOTER LOG
ST
TOP OF BANK WI4
THI ONE BOULDER
SILL ELEVATION PER PROFILE _ Profile B-B'
7/
m y '=i/'� SCOUR i ON EACH SIDE
POOL
o
ci
FOOTER BOULDERS ,
EMBED 3'MIN.
INTO EXCAVATE POOL c
BANK(TYP) Plan View PER PROFILE
E
Section B-B'
m w
]2
e Rock Sill Log Vane
w
Not to Scale Not to Scale w
E m m
z , q a
x` ^ O c O U Uri
I

/ 3'OUTSIDE TOP OF BANK LIVE STAKE(TYP��
ry �3'� SEE PLAN VIEW
EROSION CONTROL >I FOR SPACING
MATTING 7 o
JUNCUS PLUG(TYP) (SEE DETAIL) `Vr\�VO;rylfjy TOP OF BANK Q o a..
BUFFER WIDTH _ ` �j l .j z t�
DIBBLE BAR �!/'�/v/.• i v Z' 4
z.
VARIES RIFFLE TOE OF SLOPE 11 Imo' �d �,Z
'' PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A / MATERIAL k�y �\i ` z Soo v
BANKFULL BLADE WITH A TRIANGULAR NOTES: F� V�`VA`rA��✓�� C� -
au Wr a CROSS-SECTION,AND SHALL OE OF SLOPE �� Or�fi S L, ,I b�'a
RESTORED BE 12INCHES LONG,4 ALL SOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER .,c�,o' .y w
LL
CHANNEICI'
- INCHES WIDE AND 1 INCH PLANTING AREA SHALL BE
$ DISKED,AS REQUIRED,PRIOR
THICK AT CENTER. TO PLANTING. 6'-8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
ROOTING PRUNING • ALL PLANTS SH:DOLL
LL BE 3'-5'SPACING FOR IUNCUS PLUGS Section View-UTl,UT2,Barn Branch,Old Bus Tributary,
SPACING PER PROPERLY HANDLED PRIOR TO and Rifle Tributary
PLANTING PLAN ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED INSTALLATION TO INSURE Plan View-UT1,UT2,Barn Branch,Old Bus Tributary,and Rifle Tributary
Section View TO AN APPORIATE LENGTH SURVIVAL.
TO PREVENT J-ROOTING.
TOP OF BANK
O ®
O3 Oq O5 O EROSION CONTROL 'S,
LIVE STAKE(TYP) MATTING
SEE PLAN VIEW (SEE DETAIL)
`1t/ ,.`�// `1/ ,`// `;r' FOR SPACING "„ TOP OF BANK /�
' ' IUNCUS PLUG(TYP) \\\ '�Y)
!�\j1jj1 1\%�\%\\%1\%� %�\%�\%l\%1, �\\%1\j1\jl\j� �1;,,>j1j1 i1\jl�jljl\j� i1\%�%�%�\%��%1\%�%l\%1i 'l\1 /�\%%�%�\%�%�\%�i '�\%�%�\%1\/ n�%1\j1\jl\j1J \���
!p!\!p!\\ i\\!p!\\!p!C !p!p!p!\ �\\!p!p!p!� .p!\!p!\\ iplp!\!p!C i\\!p!C/\!p<i\!p!\�l0!\ i01� l\\<s\!p!\!p!\� ;\\!p!p!p!p<�,�plplplp!\ ��l
!\!i\G\G\!i i\!\!i�G\G G\G\!�!i\Q\ !\G\G\!\!i G�!i\G\G\!i. i\!\!i\q\q� i\�i\ri r\ri\¢�1�G\G\!�!ie r��i�. 0 \G\rr\G\G� !\G\G�!\G\�`�G\G\!�!ie TOE OF SLOPE '� r r
\\>>p \\r\ MOM
>\r\ �l,\r\>\r� .\r\>>\;>1� \\ \\ \1\r\>\r9 lr1 lr\,1\\>> \r\> \r\>\r9 RIFFLE ' CC!
r!! �\r!j\'!j\!j\r� :!1\r!1\r!�\!1!1<�!j\!1\r!1\r!�\!� �!�\!1!1\r!1!9<��\r!9'lll9rl� 1\rlllSill9rll��19r19r1�\!1 V1<1i.•,,A,l9r19'lll9rll 1\r!j!�\!j\r!j\r!j\!j\!j\r!j\r!�\!j OE OF SLOPE f
ii9il�i�\i9il�\i�\i!\\i9�lS 19�19i�\i11i9�1Si\\i9�19i�A �\rllAil�i�\iA�l9i9il�1 i�\rl�i�\i1Ail�i\\iAil�\i�\r!1 'y�\rllAi�i�\iAil�\i�\rl�i9jl1; p9jlm oVfE TH Ef9f9jI\f1 MATERIAL \
AAAAAAAAA 1 .c c i i c i i c i c c i i c i i c c i bU4*'AAAA' .AAAAAAAAAA. .AAAAAAAAA I
INSERT THE DIBBLE,OR REMOVE THE DIBBLE,OR INSERT THE DIBBLE,OR PUSH THE DIBBLE,OR PULL BACK ON THE REMOVE THE DIBBLE,OR 6'-8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES •�•�• r �•
SHOVEL,STRAIGHT SHOVEL,AND PUSH THE SHOVEL,SEVERAL SHOVEL,DOWN TO HANDLE TO CLOSE THE SHOVEL,AND CLOSE AND 3 -5'SPACING FOR IUNCUS PLUGS
SEEDLING ROOTS DEEP INTO INCHES IN FRONT OF
DOWN INTO THE SOIL THE FULL DEPTH OF BOTTOM OF THE FIRM UP THE OPENING Section View-North Little HuntingCreek
TO THE FULL DEPTH OF THE PLANTING HOLE.I PULL THE SEEDLING AND THE BLADE. PLANTING HOLD. THEN WITH YOUR HEEL. BE 2-3'SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
THE BLADE AND PULL THE SEEDLING BACK UP TO PUSH THE BLADE PUSH FORWARD TO CLOSE CAREFUL TO AVOID
BACK ON THE HANDLE THE CORRECT PLANTING HALFWAY INTO THE THE TOP,ELIMINATING AIR DAMAGING THE SEEDLING. Plan View-North Little Hunting Creek g
TO OPEN THE PLANTING DEPTH(THE ROOT COLLAR SOIL. TWIST AND PUSH POCKETS AROUND THE 1 Y O
HOLE. (DO NOT ROCK SHOULD BE 1 TO 3 INCHES THE HANDLE FORWARD ROOT.
THE SHOVEL BACK AND BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE). TO CLOSE THE TOP OF �^m
FORTH AS THIS CAUSES GENTLY SHAKE THE THE SLIT TO HOLD THE >¢ '�
SEEDLING TO ALLOW THE SEEDLING IN PLACE. J CIS 5,
SOIL IN THE PLANTING DIAMETER
HOLE TO BE ROOTS TO STRAIGHTEN
COMPACTED, OUT. DO NOT TWIST OR a 0
INHIBITING ROOT SPIN THE SEEDLING OR ®$fie ROOF Planting ®StI'eambank Planting
^�¢ LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS rt
GROWTH. LEAVE THE ROOTS Not to Scale Not to Scale SHOWN ON DETAIL AND DIRECTED BY THE
1-ROOTED. Live Stake Detail ENGINEER. U
a-
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC O
STEP _q POOL_ B TO END OF KEY ROCKS to
SOIL BACKFILL 7 :~
} O ROCK TOE BANK PROTECTION(TYP)O COIR FIBER MATTING E
NO:AEi.:BETWEEN ROCK
3'MIN \•Ai4i��O�G\�G' :r\ri\`P\G\���!<i��GiP
�i ` ��� _ \\i�` ���`i��i��i�`i�\;il�<\\, ENDROCKUPTOEOFSLOPEPROPOSEDBANKFULL K���r!\\l\\P��l�l�\P\\�l��l�?�l�l +' i)•j ,�•:,•, 1• :fjijir\\f�\\r;\rrZ\2\r\2\rr\\'i Aj? > �rZ�.rr \2r\2rr rZ\2r�\rrZ\2r\2rr rrZ� cl�•/ ? /,, �. i 1pWWW!\�WW�\�WWtir!\�WW�dWh, vWwvW �\vWWWrltZ V Mlv�\ Oe1%C.: �e1Jtll x - - �' ll r�\�\G ri O\O\rr L�r �\�\G ri O\O\ri�\�\G ri�+ �� � - i0 - G G�'\\il Gi,\\i \� i �G\\i!`�\�\`i! G�\ cn✓.y I '/./� ��• '/./1 �• > '/./ \\/�/�/�i\✓�/'1j\\j�j ,��,� fir../. i i.� i.7 ,\\'\\\\'\\'�\\'\✓�/"�/�/ ,.. • `� //./�� • �/ /�11�1 \!!O!O!�!O!!\\!1\i�ii��l�>�tl�Y��J ��• ��yi t.>�� <�• 1 • • `'t 1 BOULDERl�\!�\l\\.�� II1 ��� /iY�•' / EYI N TO��i`�\\i\✓1✓`✓ ✓✓✓Y`✓Y1.i . �k/,�'�� L'��l/ 1,� �� �� [� ?\\r!\� \ram\�p!r
\`_ 1� � v�loWWrvWW�IoWWW<SW�\rr �\'loW�. �� .iv\\W\\<SWW'!S'l��lo✓W�v'WW��<\�W��r`�i!`�✓!`\p✓r✓✓!✓r✓r✓rr1�W✓ail +�1/.�_... •�► _ /.i- /Zb •1� i /au. - .1NATURLGROUND ��\'l���rr\���\'l���lrl�� �\'l�lrl �1�'�J .J .y-/.Rl�lrl���rll���li!✓✓�ir�✓✓Ei!✓✓�rrr!'Prl'%'-:STONE BASE'?\'!' "�-i� �� vl. �1r11�\rllrllrllr!\�1r11�\rllrllrl�rllrlll1�\rllrllrllr!\��y�>r!>�I �r.r �M�/q!lyl1�\rllrllrllr!\�1r11�\r!1\j!1\jllrl9�1\j!1\�\r!1\j!1\jllrl9jll\j!1\jllr!\r .r11�\r!1\\\r\\i\\r�i\\r9r\\r\\r�i\\r�r\\i9i\\r\\r�r\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i�i\ri\\i\\i�r\\i�i\\r9i\\i\\r\i\`i»p' • '. %>Y\\r\\r�i\\r\\r\\r\\r\\r�r\\r9r\\r\\r\\r\\rr\\r9r\\r\\r�r\\r�r\\r\\r\\r�r\\r9r\\i\\i\\i\\i�i\\i\\i\\i\\i
\llplp!\\lplplpllplplplplplpllplplpllplp!\\lplplpl�lplplplplplpl�lplpl<�<��. � plplplplplpllplplpl 1plp!\\lplplpllplplplplplpllplplplvlplp!\\lplplpl�lplplplplp!
/ p.rrrr.p✓.p.rr.rr.pq.p✓.p.rr✓r.p✓r.rr.rr.rrrr.rr. .rr.rr.rr.rrrr.rr.�.rr.rr.rr.�✓r.rr.rr.�.rr:rr:�.q.rr. .i,!✓.!i!,!✓i.!,!✓.!i,!,!,!i.!,!✓.!i,!,!,!i.!i,!,!�✓i.!�,!�✓.!i,!�,!�,!i.!�,!�✓i
ELEVATION PER PROFILE l I '`\\\j�\j\j1r�\j�j\\j�\j�\j\j1r�\j�\j\j1r�\j�j\\j�\r�\r\j1r�\raj\\r\r\r\j1r�\j\j\j1rr�j\\r�\rl jai-. \r�\r\j1r�\raj\\r�\r�\r\j 4raj\\j�\r�\r\j1r�\j�r\j1r�\j�j\\j�\j�\j\j1r�\j�j\\j�\j�
BANKFULL !\l\\1�i1\i1i\\i9i1\i\\i1i1\i1\i\\i1i1\i1i\\i9i1\i\\i1i1\i1i\\i9i1\i\\i11\1\i\\i1i1\i1\\i9i9i\\ililr.r�l9i9i\\i1i9i1i\\i9i9i\\i1i9i1i\\i9i9i\\i1i9i1i\\i1i9i1i\\i9i9i\\i1i9i1i\\i9l
q ems' BACKFILL AROUND AND 9�1f9�9�9�9f1�9�9�\\f1�9�1�\\�9�9�9f1�9�1f9�9�9�9f1�9�9�\\f1�9�1�\\�9�9�\\f1�9�1f9�9�9�9f1�9�9�\\f1�9�1i\\i9i91\\ll\\lpll\\l\\\\���\\���\\�\\�\\��,\\�\\�\\�\\��l\\l\ll
EXTEND SILL TO TIE BETWEEN ROCK WITH ♦p�\`rr'`,\rr'`rr'`rr'`,`rr'`rr'`rr'r,`'`rr'`,\rr'`rr'`rr',`'`rr'`,\rr'`rr'`rr'`t,`rr'`rr'`rr'r,`'`rr'`l,`rr'`rr'`rr'�,`�'`rr'`�,\rr'`rr'`rr'`�prrp ♦\p
INTO NATURAL GROUND WELL GRADED MIX
\i\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!\�\i!\i!\i!\i!\i!r
\`r!`r!``r!`r!`r!\r!``r!`\r!`r!`r!\r!``r!`\r!`r!`r!``r!`r!`r!\r!``r!`�`r!`r!`r!\r!`�`r!`�\rllrll
COF No.57,LASS B R I PRAPS A, ii;```ii`G`ii ii�!r\!r\i ii;```',``G`G\l```G!`\``G!`GI G�'`G`f\ii
COIR FIBER MATTING
Plan Veiw
IS'
r\\� Step Sectionlie::4:1-11 A' iryr �\rr\\rr\�G�\i'^
\\1\ 'p1\1 01\S
ELEVATION PER PROFILE ELEVATION PER PROFILE `r\r\\r\r!\�9�9r19'!1\�9�119�9�9r19'!1\rl9rll!\�<11"> ,- `119�9r19r19�1\�9�119�1\�9�1!\\�9�9r!\\�1\�1\�119�\\r
FILTER FABRIC ELEVATION PER PROFILE \�j�\`j\\j�Oj�\`j�Qj�\`\`j�\`j\\j�Oj�\`j�\`j\`��Oj�\`j�Q�\`�`�\ \�i`\`�p��\`��\\��\`\`��\`\\��p��\`��\\��\`��p��\`��\\��\`�\`��\`�p��prl\rl ri
ROCK \!\\���\\��r!\\\\\\\\���\\\\\\���\\���\\\\\\\\��rl��lo \\r\\!\\r\!\\!\r\\r\\!\\!\\!\!\\!\l\\���\\���\\�I
\lr�li�!i`G�!i�!;!i;!i�!i�!!i;!i�!i�!i\G�!i�!;!i;!i�!i�!i`<<\p,\ ;�PRO OSEDBANKFULL;G\G�G\io STONE BASE ,rlrrrr\irrr\i�r�rl\irrr\i�r�rlrri. \i���; \ it\ijr�,,__. 1 0.5'MAX i lf�i!\��I;f�il ��\ �f�il \13%l�il�il�il�il�il�il���iil�il�il�il�il���il���l�l ��\��I;f�il \lf�il9flr� •. 15" ;{ } 1`�\r!`r!`r!`�`illy!lr!\r!\�1r11�\rllrllr!\r!\�1r11�\rllrllrll�\rllrllrllr!\�14>\rllrllrllr!\�1r11�\rllrllrll�;,� \r11\r11 \r11\rl\r!\r!\P\P
.�\ p�9� .�,, I�,\ _ • \rllrllrll�\rl�r!\�rl�rl��P��rl��ltP�rl��rl�P��PG��rG!`�l`PrG!`�rG!`��il`�rl�rG!`�rl�r!`LPG`�i��\\r_i\\r_r\\r9r\���`�ilOiG!`�iG!`��i��`iGPROPGOGSED TGHALWGEGG /!�/!`�/!�/!\\
NOTES: f !1\rr1\rrllp�l\!r1�< `. /'>�!rj\!r9rrj\!rj���� I •�> rGr!\rr1\rr7f\\i✓✓�ilL✓✓ryilL✓yi!\\i✓<1`i .r`vilL✓✓ryilL✓yi\\i✓✓y\iL✓yi\\i✓✓yi!\\ij1\ij r
\P\rl\rl\P\l\rl\l\P\, l\P\rl\rl\P�«., l\rl\l\P\. l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\.\ l\l\l 1 1\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l\l l r
pLi\ii\ii\plii\i\plihii. :+ii\i\plii\ii\ii\p, , r1r1r\r1r. � \i1�\rr1p1p1�\rr1p1p1p\rr1p1�\rr1p11r\r1\♦ \1\1r1�\p1r1
• OVER-EXCAVATE CHANNEL BED TO A DE PTH EQUAL TO THE �i!\�il�r!\!\�i!\�i!\�rl�i!\�rl��l�l�<!�<�........\<�l�P�r!\\r!\\rl�r!\\rl�r!\\!\\rl�rl�irp.. 12 MINI"
N" .�p�plpi�\\r�p�lpi!\ \p�y\�j\�j\�rlylQr!>\r!\\o,
TOTAL THICKNESS OF THE BOULDERS AND STONE BASE \rl�P�llrl1�11111r1119�1r11�9r111pr1119r1111r111��1r11�11111r1119�1r11�9r1119r11<�<1�1'v vv'v`\`1\l9r1119�1r11�9r1111ri11�<Swv'>`h\r!\\r!1'.
• STONE BASE SHALL B E A M XTU RE O F 2"-12"STONE.STONE r l\rlpr!\\r!\r!P p r♦ r!\Pp�lp��p��\\�p��pfp��p��p��p��p�p��pfp��p��p��p��p�p��p��p/!\\P\r! \Pprlp��p��p?p��pfp��p��p��p��p?p��p��p��\\�p��pfp��p�!
BASE DEPTH SHALL B 15". \. .\\r\\rr\\r!\\r!`r!\`r!\r!\`�\`r!\`r!\\rl�r!\\rr�r\\.\. p.\\\\r!\\rlprl�r!\\rl�r!\\`\\r!\\rl�rlp�\\r!\\r!\\r ` u w
• PLACE BOULDERS IN TRENCH ON TOP OF STONE BASE.THERE \\r\p\/\\ \\\\\pL!\\/!�/!\\�\\/!\\/!�/!\\�\\/!\\/ ¢ Q
SHALL BE NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS. Pool Section View B-B' r
• MINIMUM SIZE FOR BOULDERS SHALL BE 2'x 2'x 1'. Profile View •
• PLACE BACKFILL MATERIAL BEHIND THE ROCKS AND FILTER w
FABRIC. � w
• FILTER FABRIC TO EXTEND 5'. � ®ROCK Cascade with Pools v c T
• PLACE COARSE BACKFILL BEHIND ROCKS AND FILTER FABRIC w m
ENSURING THAT ANY VOIDS BETWEEN THE ROCKS ARE FILLED. Not to Scale v a v a
J`

/ V 1
cA
Q
Zoo
t �
W u w
�z zoo�.
Q6
A �3 WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
DENSELY PACK BRUSH,WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL EROSION CONTROL MATTING w
IN BETWEEN BASE LOGS
BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW BACKFILL IN 6"MIN.LIFTS
EROSI
OF�PN�\��e BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW , 3x\)i, ///\/ 6"MIN , FILTER FABRON CONTROL MATTING IC /�\\��\\�\\K\BANKFULL)
�OQ Q\ ELEV.3"ABOVE \\\\j\j 6"MIN DENSELY PACKED BRUSH,WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL /\%%\\/
Eel DOWNSTREAM \/\ ////• �
(O�OFS�� RIFFLE INVERT j\\/ 6"MIN /////\/\//\//�\
•
S\'-' BASE LOG \/ TOE OF SLOPE / /\\//�,/�\
-s&- 0 4"-6"DIAMETER �-- Y\,,•\/\\/\ \\\��\, /\�\\�
\ A' BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE ` •
. .��,�SB COG /,
OFOPN INSTALLED FLUSH ���/�� \/I�\,\ /\ 6-12"DIAMETER
WITH BANK 1� BACKFILL NOTES:
ELEV.6"BELOW 2'MIN NATIVE SOIL
POOL DEPTH • OVEREXCAVATE 3'OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK(BANKFULL).
Plan View
• INSTALL BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW AT TOE OF SLOPE.
DIAMETER 6"-12".
Section A-A' • INSTALL BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AT INTERVALS
ALONG BANK,RESTING ON TOP OF PARALLEL BASE LOGS. BASE
LOGS SHALL BE 6"-12"DIAMETER.
• INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS,WHICH
Plan View SHALL CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED
ON-SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT
BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
®Brush Toe-UT1,UT2,Barn Branch,Old Bus Tributary,and Rifle Tributary • BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL
Not to Scale AND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM. C
ct
• INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
• INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER
ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS. O O
• SEED,MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND ;"'1
BANK STABILIZATION PER PLANS. ft U
a--C
E
z •
S3' -- WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS — CP
A BACKFILL IN 6"MIN.LIFTS U
\ 1 / EROSION CONTROL MATTING TOP OF BANK(BANKFULL) ,�y
I EROSION CONTROL MATTING
`�\`i, 4\///\/\j 6"MIN FILTER FABRIC /\/\//%�j /\/\i\/` cn
�`��el DOWNSTREAM < 6"MIN \//\/\/\\/\
F P RIFFLE INVERT DENSELY PACKED BRUSH,WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL /\/\\/\\j
O 6"MIN / /
-se Q\ DENSELY PACKED WOODY DEBRIS A v //\ ,/�
OE&'' % I�I�1 in TOE OF SLOPE / /\\%/\\%/�\\�/`�
F SCOPE //VK\ \(\\/7•7 /.
-(OEO -00 A' BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED ELEV.6"BELOW jf NATIVE SOIL
�1''' FLUSH WITH BANK POOL DEPTH
���C Plan View
Section A-A'
3
3
NOTES:
• OVEREXCAVATE 3'OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK(BANKFULL).
• INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS,WHICH -
SHALL CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED c
ON-SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT
E BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
m w m
• BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL Pi'A¢x O
®BrUSh Toe-North Little Hunting Creek AND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM. 1/'1J
Not to Scale • INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS. ¢2
• INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER Z)
ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS. w
72 • SEED,MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND v L.
BANK STABILIZATION PER PLANS. _ " a
X v z w, 3 9 1
J`

I
V
z - TO BE SET WITH FINAL GRADING -- TO BE SET WITH FINAL GRADING
\�\ TIE TO EXISTING GRADE 10'MIN -1- 8'-OVER FLOW CHANNEL Q
�� . -\—,,,- \� AT ELEVATION 928.00' TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC z �o
\ \\\.\ \i\\i r-_ TIE TO EXISTING GRADE Z R'o
f . \.\\���y�\�� 7_ TOP 3"ABC STONE 4, i�i\ �� .t u
\'�\ \.��j\ � i\\„� �iCy ROAD ELEVATION:928.0' >«>i�\��\\ \ 31 Ze
°
%. ,t iX\ \ \\ 0\\\� i\\ \ -'- - 12 MIN.COVER 12" ,�0". ,,. ' \ �'EXISTING GRADE \ i\\i��<i\\i\ i\i\ Z °H a
�\\\-�i\`\-\\\\iI
\\ INITIAL BACKFILL,PLACED IN \� \\\\,-,\:--;,----\ \ \\i�i \C�irt� \� - 2 0- 2.0'' "\ i��\��\\�\ / \\�\�\\ \ \��i�i�\ \\
• \G\\i -LIFTS OF 6"-8"ONSITE SELECT \ii \ i\\i \,- \\ \� i \\\!i���\Yi\\!\ -\\,--.-„i �\�--_ \\ \ "M. i\-A\ i0,-- �i\i��\\ i\i%, i\y\Y \i\i\�\\�\i\i i\f \ i\\i \\- -\- \\y�\ \\\50/50 MIX CLASS A AND
i\\� \i \\ice \\ � <\ \�" "- \\\ --,\...--\\i i
MATERIAL \��\ i\i�� i\\i\ \�� i\�\�\ ELEVATION TO BESEiWI�HFINALGRADING ��\i/ \�\ \i\�-\\ CLASSBRIPRAP
i\ �\i\�� i\\\��\\\�i\� i\\i\ ",..\,.,„*.. „,„\\�\iC\�i\y 'r� � i %\� \\\ . \\\!\_l\\_�\, \ice\,\\ice \i\i\\�n\%�i�\F
�i\ �� \\/�� \ • �%�\ EMBED CULVERT6"AS \%`-\•<\•\\\ \\\\l --r.i\\\ \i\\ice�ii\; 57 ST . \\fi
CATTLE EXCLUSION FENCE \\ \\�\\i�\\�� #57 STONE /\\ \-\SHOWN ON PROFILE.
..i\�\�\\�\\i"a�\\\'�\`• �� �� \ BACKFILL WITH 50 50 MIX
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ��� `��� \\%,,,,,-(,‘,\ ��\i\��� -'CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL AS
INV.EL:1135.62 U/S%fYi�Y`\\�\\! .�6"MIN.BEDDING,
INV.EL:1134.42 D/S #57 STONE
Cross Section View at Center of Road 'N,
INITIAL BACKFILL,PLACED IN COARSE AGGREGATE 3"
LIFTS OF 6"-8"ONSITE SELECT ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MATERIAL e'•'•'•'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•.,.,.
3:1 Ar %\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\ �q� CLASS B STONE
/ =g \/\\/\\/\/\\�/\�/j\�/\\�/\\�\\/�\�\ . 3:1 MINIMUM
42"X529"CMP � \ t\//\//\�i�/\//\// \//♦ •
�T•Y. AAA AAAAAA AA •7
30 LF =-®ice/\/\�` o *\ e/0.\.\/Y/V �. s.
A „g/\/%\"/j\\//j\\/j\\/>/\\/\/%\/j\\//%\/j\\/j\Y/\\\/%\�/j -ci2 INSTALL SILL
�i \\ \/ � \/\\/\\/\Y�\/\\/\\/\/\�� PER PROFILE
—\_
PROPOSED \ J
PROFILE INV EL 923.46' INV EL 922.99' /
•rl
r- 50'EASEMENT BREAK '1 Q
O ;,,.,
ct
Profile View of Culvert Crossing ®Permanent Culvert Crossing-UT1 czt U
Not to Scale
a--U
TO BE SET WITH FINAL GRADING -- TO BE SET WITH FINAL GRADING -
z
`� TIE TO EXISTING GRADE 5'MIN -- 8'-OVER FLOW CHANNEL - TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
�\\\\ - _ TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
\,%. t S
.-„,,, \\,,,--„\ \\i-- „� TOP 3"ABC STONE
\ \\A<\ \\\ice\i'-\\f\ \�\\\\4f-
,-\ i\ ROAD ELEVATION:928.0' ~4 _ Ti\`\� �i\\i , �\/ 0
f\ �\ \i\ rim' .�i `\\ i\i�\\ii i\i\ ��\ •
12' MINCOVER 12 i \1'\ i\ ( .X\ i��\\ �y\\\i\
\i\ i \�\� �\ f > i ii\\\i\ \,EXISTING GRAD E�\ \ii \\i�\�'\�.� 6
'-, \*f\i\\\ \ i i\i\ i\i\ =e Y;: \t iCi i i \ i i \\\,i \ \�i \\ i. ...,\
i i\\i C�'\i \ -- \ \\i\i
' �\�-\\\i\\i\\\\\\\i\ i\\i\\i i�\\i�\�\�y�\\\�'Cii��ici�\��� �` """ """"":,,"" -"� -- '' """"';-, ..R\����t\�\�\\1�\�\i\�\\ \ y��i\�\� \�i i\\i�i\�\\i\i �\i\\�\ \�\!\i\ i%�i\\�\l��\�\\. �
,\� \�Y\\�\\/\\\ \�\..i\ INI IAL BACKFILL,PLACED IN: �\y i\ i\Y�\ i ' i�j !\�\i\i\Y\\ i\i\\\ '\i\ \i"\\''''\i \\>-- 4
��"' - ELEVATION TO BE SET WITH FINAL GRADING ycy-- i\i 4�\ \\i \ \\\�\ \„ \\,
\�i ��\�����\\LIFTS OF6"-8"ONSITESELECT ��i��\\(\%-W \� � ' \\�\ 'i �2.0''-' 20'-� ".- - \ \�ii\\ i\i\\ i\\ i\i �i i\ \ \ \�` S
\..\\ MATERIALi\\\�\\i\ �\\�i �\\�\ \i\\� \i\\i\ . �\„\\i i\Ts-,.,,,,-
\%\\y\\\\i\ ,-,,- \\\,- \\��i\i\ \--\---�\\\i� \\�-\50/50 MIXCLASSAAND
i\ ii� \, \i\`i\ice\ \\\ - "' \\\ '�\\ i i\i\ �\�i i\i ��i i\\ \\i i�"
�;\�{\\Y f\\��\i\i�\�\ \\��\y�i`�ii i \\i\\�\ \\i\\i\�i\i\ � \\�\�\j\ A\,i \ \�i i\i\\ U%\�, i\•\i�\ \\\F CLASS B R P RAP
�(\ �i�i �\ \\i\\���<\y\!i\\\-•`\.��\�\\\� EMBED CULVERT 6"AS �i\��
CATTLE EXCLUSION FENCE �,\'\ \�\\�i\\ice ��#57 STONE / r �rrr .SHOWN ON PROFILE.
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL • ��\\\\> 35"x 24"CMP�\y ��� �\�\�i\�i \\��\� \\ BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
INV.EL:1162.46 U/S'i�\W�� i`�)\-,-- a\\!\� \\"`CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL
INV.EL:1158.92 D/S 6'MIN.BEDDING,
#57 STONE
Cross Section View at Center of Road
INITIAL BACKFILL,PLACED IN COARSE AGGREGATE 3"
LIFTS OF 6"-8"ONSITE SELECT ...............
MATERIAL i:i.•illiki;:_i :•:•:•:•:•:::•:•: iii.•••.
3:1 �wi.%`�/w//vw//"..
•Ti®/\//\/\/\//\//\\//\//\/\/\� • 3:1 CLASS B STONE
35"X24"CMP �i / / /jy/�/ ///j\�j�/�//y\//\�trc MINIMUM
• \ \ • INSTALL SILL
A�s \ \/\//\\//\\/\yj//\\//\\/\/\\//\\//\y //\\//\\/\//\-7.t74, PER PROFILE
04.4
,, PROPOSED \ (/ m w co,PROFILE INV.EL U/S INV.EL D/Su O
r,axu
ro
r" 50'EASEMENT BREAK '1 •
Profile View of Culvert Crossing ermanent Culvert Crossing-UT2
w
Not to Scale
llq X _E m m
v z q a 1
o a 6- n
J

/ V 1
PROPOSED GRADE
VI
z 6' I
P.
�, 3,1 3;1 I—I
no ELEV:1156.0' 'z D
A c m
12" I~1' CLASS A/B/I RIP RAP t . U 4
Rock Weir
FILTER FABRIC `n 2
PROPOSED GRADE 6
H W
GRADING TO BE INCLUDED WITH FINAL PLANS
6'
31 '5N
12" CLASS A/B/I
r-1 RIP RAP
Outlet Channel
WIDTH VARIES PER DRAINAGE INSTALL ONE ROW FILTER FABRIC
f MIN.WIDTH OF 6' OF LIVE STAKES AT
EROSION CONTROL "7 TOP OF BANK
MATTING - - Profile View
?Z 0P�
Mqk �� � tit
6"MIN. STAKE AND SECURE
CLASS B EROSION CONTROL
STONE
Section View ELEV:1156.0'
TIE TO EXISTING
GRADE
ELEV:1157.0' d
4 :J ti �I+
b'
ELEV:1155' PROPOSED GRADE
Section A-A'
NOTES:
• POSITVE DRAINAGE TO BE MAINTAINED FOR
FLOODPLAIN DRAINAGES. NOTES: •r�-Ict
• OUTLET CHANNEL TO BE SEEDED AND MATTED WITH CIS
®Outlet Stabilization ®Proposed BMP with Rock Weir Outlet-Rifle Tributary • 1.IF NATIVE ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE,QUARRIED
EROSION CONTROL MATTING. 1� ;—I
• GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES INSTALLED PER PLAN. r ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE SAME SIZES.
Not to Scale • PROPOSED GRADING IN DRAINAGES PER PLAN. ``'``' Not to Scale • 2.ALL SMALLER ROCK SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS ;-1
{, {, F AND WELL MIXED. a--) ft
3 0 0 • 3.BOULDERS SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM f U
DIMENSION OF 2'x 2'x 1'. ,-I
-I--I
HEAD OF RIFFLE(TYP.) ��� O to
NATIVE ROCK EQUIVALENT E z\ —I
FLOW 6 3' TO CLASS I RIPRAP OR ON-SITE STONE
MEETING CLASS 1 GRADATION
'�� ~~~~
HEAD OF POOL(TYP.) I--I
SLOPE
RPp VARIES �I
.. f t R ROFILE Cr)1tm III `"
FILL MATERIAL BOULDERS FILTER FABRIC �� -`����I' NO Profile
MIX OF NATIVE ROCK
EQUIVALENTTO y A y B
CLASS 1 RIP-RAP
HEAD OF RIFFLE(TYP.) 3
BOULDERS HEAD OF POOL(TYP.) CONNECT TO
EXISTING
0.5' 1 GROUND
1 ZS. 15.
5'
.r ';}i .r �10 •.tptith'►' TO BE INCLUDED WITH PINAL PLANS
f'�i'�'���i����i� f i'i�eZ�����!E �S'�,.r.��rey!ti�lry+f i
FLOW J�'��J�'�� ��J0''CI �4,4404,1 'I 1.0'MIN RIFFLE i
1" 1 1 1 •tarikl 1 1' 1 1 14114104411
tt MATERIAL
1 ��}•, `luh� `-Ap1f•; Section A-A'
EXCAVATE POOL PER 4
PROFILE
NOTES: m
— A' — B'
1.IF NATIVE ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE,QUARRIED
ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE SAME SIZES. 1.0' CONNECTTO
EXISTING ro W U O
x 2.ALL SMALLER ROCK SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS GROUND Q x U
ecl AND WELL MIXED. SPSC Pldn View ?'I 1 j,o A
3.BOULDERS SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM
DIMENSION OF 2'x 2'x 1'.
L
Structure Sizing
®Step Pool Stormwater Conveyance (SPSC)
Section B-B' Not to Scale d -
E
ltc Not to Scale
x 2` ^ z c O U li,

/ V
z
6"MIN.OVERLAP IN / 1.25" 01 o ti
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION .p; 'Z z ry o
AT MAT ENDS ,\\�I I� ty 'u�w,,ECO-STAKE TYP TOP OF B � t7 �� �
1Z o6"
SPq��xG •
- -- -- - ...� Co
,... ---- 8'MAX.WITH WIRE
+ ~(6'MAX.WITHOUT WIRE)'
TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View Eco-Stake MIDDLE AND
VERTICAL WIRES FILTER FABRIC
SHALL BE 121 GAGE COMPACTED FILL EXISTING GROUND
■ MIN FILTER FABRIC
EROSION CONTROL ^
MATTING(TYP) TOP OF BANK TOP AND BOTTOM STRAND I _ I Y
SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN. I� 1 1
Oo
N
a
ECO-STAKE(TYP) �O'�O, ��*'3 ,< � �� �� �� � � 4„ a o
C
�����, WIRE LJ LJ EXINTO T ENCTEND IH F 4
V,lV
RIFFLE MATERIAL TOE OF SLOPE *\
vv., i/
RUN MATTING UNDER Section View
RIFFLE MATERIAL STAKE(TYP)
NOTES:
• USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32"IN WIDTH a)
AND WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF •,--1
WIRES ct
WIRES WITH 12"STAY SPACING.
®Erosion Control Matting ®Silt Fence • USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" �' O
Not to Scale Not to Scale IN WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO
THE WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE 0
ENGINEER. +) (�
• PROVIDE 5'STEEL POST OF THE ft U
SELF-FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
ANGLE STEEL TYPE. y
FILTER OF 1"DIA. TOP OF SILT FENCE END OF FILTER FABRIC E
if hl.ID' MUST BE AT LEAST 1'
�111W� WASHED STONE
STEEL FENCE POST ABOVE THE TOP OF SILT FENCE 8
WIRE FENCE HE WASHED STONE rr
HARDWARE CLOTH 4'MIN.
�� FILTER OF 1"DIA. CP
WASHED STONE 1 O
FILTER FABRIC
iiiii iiiiiIviiie.
� i
? �K ''1',' -aa ''.:7 ON GROUND I I �� U
ECI)
— BURY WIRE FENCE i ti
SILT FENCE AND HARDWARE CLOTH e a--�
MUD MATS `END OF FILTER FABRIC STEEL FENCE POST BURY WIRE FENCE,FILTER FABRIC, S
X'DIM SET MAX 2'APART AND HARDWARE CLOTH IN TRENCH
4 WATER DIVERSION CHANNEL Plan View Section View Front View
INSTALLATION: FOR A SILT BARRIER: FOR A SILT FENCE:
I~
Y\ REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.DURING INSTALLATION OF JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER,PLACE A JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER,PLACE
THE SILT BARRIER OR SILT FENCE,INSPECT THE INSTALLATION TO DETERMINE IF OUTLETS LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUND TO A LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUND
SUPPORT LOG FILTER FABRIC ARE NEEDED ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BY TO PROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BY
12"0 MIN. CLASS B BARRIER AND FENCE.IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION, OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET;PLACE 6 INCHES OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET;PLACE 6
STONE EXTENT,OR METHOD OF INSTALLATION,CONTACT THE ENGINEER,ARCHITECT,OR OF THE UPPER EDGE IN THE TRENCH.STAKE THE INCHES OF THE UPPER EDGE IN THE TRENCH.
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE.EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL REMAINING EDGES OF THE FABRIC TO HOLD IT STAKE THE OTHER EDGES OF THE FABRIC TO
HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND MAY HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLED IN PLACE. HOLD IT IN PLACE.
OUTLETS AS AN AID TO INSTALLATION. ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO, ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL
IF THE SILT FENCE OUTLET IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME,IT WILL HAVE PLACE STEEL FENCE POSTS FOR STRENGTH.THE GO,PLACE ADDITIONAL STEEL FENCE POSTS
TO BE REBUILT. POSTS MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APART FOR STRENGTH.THE POSTS MUST BE A
DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ON THE GROUND BEFORE COMPLETING INSTALLATION AND DRIVEN INTO SOLID GROUND AT LEAST 18 MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APART AND DRIVEN
OF THE SILT FENCE,TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION: INCHES. INTO SOLID GROUND AT LEAST 18 INCHES.
INSTALL THE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT(S)IN THE BARRIER OR FENCE WHERE PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH(WELDED PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH(WELDED
WATER WILL POND. GALVANIZED SCREEN WITH SQUARE 1/4- GALVANIZED SCREEN WITH SQUARE 1/4-
INSTALL THE OUTLET WHERE IT IS ACCESSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION,MAINTENANCE,AND 1/2-INCH HOLES)ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE 1/2-INCH HOLES)ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE
q REMOVAL. POSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE IN PLACE. POSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE IN
NOTES: e Temporary Stream Crossing-Mut Mat ALLOW AT LEAST: PUT 6 INCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF THE CLOTH PLACE.PUT 6 INCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF THE
• CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN Not to Scale 15 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND SINGLE-STORY BUILDINGS. IN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO THE POSTS CLOTH IN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO THE
FLOW IS AT NORMAL BASEFLOW. 25 FEET FOR FORK LIFTS BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND MULTIPLE-STORY WITH LENGTHS OF WIRE. POSTS WITH LENGTHS OF WIRE. _
• MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION BUILDINGS. BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE
OF STREAM BANKS. DO NOT EXCAVATE 10 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL SLOPES. AND THE UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTER FABRIC CLOTH,THE UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTER
CHANNEL BOTTOM. PLACE THE OUTLET SO THAT WATER FLOWING THROUGH IT WILL NOT CREATE AN BELOW THE OUTLET IN THE TRENCH AND FABRIC BELOW THE OUTLET,AND THE WIRE
INSTALL STREAM CROSSING EROSION HAZARD BELOW:AVOID STEEP SLOPES BELOW THE OUTLET AND AREAS COMPACT THE FILL. FENCE IN THE TRENCH AND COMPACT THE ro w co) m
• PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW. WITHOUT PROTECTIVE VEGETATION.USE SLOPE DRAINS IF NECESSARY. PLACE A FILTER OF 1-INCH DIAMETER WASHED FILL. rt a'x uu
• MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET:FOR A SILT BARRIER,WHEN THE TRENCH IS STONE ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET. PLACE A FILTER OF 1-INCH DIAMETER WASHED `-'10 M
DUG TO BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC BECAUSE THE BARRIER WILL BE OMITTED AT STONE ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET. V�.
PILE THE STONE UP TO THE TOP OF THE
THE CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT •
�¢
ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
THE OUTLET;FOR A SILT FENCE,WHEN THE WIRE FENCE IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THE FILTER HARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINT PILE THE STONE UP TO THE TOP OF THE
• STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B FABRIC WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET. BETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE BARRIER. HARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINT m
REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE OUTLET IN THE PLAN. BETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE SILT FENCE. "
STONE TO THE EDGE OF THE MUD MAT. CLEAR STUMPS AND ROOTS FROM THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET.CLEAR ADEQUATE
• CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN E ,n
APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE ACCORDING ACCESS FOR THE EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION,MAINTENANCE,AND ®Temporary Silt Fence Gravel Outlet v z v 3 Y
x REMOVAL
TO EQUIPMENT UTILIZED. . Not to Scale o ll.a o ,J 'D'

C VcA
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
z IMPERVIOUS DIKE /� INTAKE/ HOSE ?"TYPE SEAMS.
(SEE INSET"B") _// PUMP BAG PLACED ON ",'
AGGREGATED OR STRAW. Q
SEWN IN SPOUT (9 ,n N
A �� HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING EXISTING TERRAIN /DEWATERING BAG w
pOi001
l' o DEWATERINGBAG NOPLACEDING HOSE �. // i w
�2Z I
m
1�,41� DISCHARGE HOSE FROM PUMP STREAM BED Q �,
ill r 15' I 8"of CLASS B RIPRAP ~ o
A ,�f. FLEXIBLE
(, • DISCHARGE HOSE
0� • • FILTER FABRIC
/ eJ ••••••• 15'to20'
Inset"A"
••••�••••••••• S0, DewateringBag NOTE:
/ A fi••••••••••. 1. PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO
II'''IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,••Mt,
•e•J�!a!Ue•!tt, BZGX6 ) STREAM BED
pi,°' �%•••�•��r••�• 9 /SAND
ORSTONE..i 71.1
��
1, • • • ,• • •; �2 C ___--IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
CLASSASTONE ••••�,•••••!' F -� 1
8"MIN.DEPTH • •: • •` ,/` �o ;� 1 FLOW �;
�1 '9nF9 ..--__
NOTES: Inset°B„ STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B
INTAKE HOSE RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS DIKE Impervious Dike GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
• PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS. •EWATERING �'�� :': (SEE INSET"B") LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
• LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL PUMP FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS p
STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENT CHECKS OF FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE. 10'MIN. PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
_
• MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF
MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING ifl
WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY. DISCHARGE HOSE 10'X 5'STABILIZED OUTLET
• ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY \/� \z'z'� \/k/k \\ ' a-)
DEWATERING BAG USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND � �
MUST BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY. (SEE INSET"A") NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC. ▪rl
• USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE (SEE INSET"C") , , . tia a / FILTER FABRIC '
AGGREGATE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. ;-I
• PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE. Inset"C" o O
®Construction Entrance Plan View ®Pump Around System Stabilized Outlet czt U
Not to Scale Not to Scale
▪ a
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS Z
RADIUS OF TREE PROTECTIO (�
PHYSICAL PROPERTY TESTS REQUIREMENTS \__—� BARRIER PER PLANS. 8 _
MATERIAL N/A POLYETHYLENE C�
RECOMENDEDCOLOR N/A "INTERNATIONAL ORANGE" ��� �-
TENSILE YIELD ASTM D638 AVE.2000 LBS.PER 4'WIDE oo
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH ASTM D638 AVE.2900 LBS.PER 4'WIDE �_ ,-i—
ELONGATION AT BREAK(%) ASTM D638 GREATER THAN 1000% �___
�� -
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE N/A INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
---____� y
_Jo Plan View
6'MAX.WITH WIRE — i�� —�
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING 6'WOODEN OR METAL"T"POSTS
METAL WIRE TIES REMOVE ALL BRUSH AND SHALL BE USED AS STANDARDS.
DEBRIS FROM INSIDE DRIPLINE. SAFETY FENCE SHALL BEATTACHED TO
STANDARDS TO FORM BARRIER.
ORANGE SAFTY T 1
7EGESAFTY 1
"T"OR"U"POST DRIVEN �} m
MINIMUM OF 18"INTO GROUND L ' — - —
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4'MIN.
h' E U
C I I I I Section View `"
E, I I I I 18"MIN. o
u Li
NOTES:
Z)
O
• ALL TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS SHALL BE w
s ®Safety Fence ®Tree Protection REMOVED PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR v _ m
DEMOBILIZATION. E
X
Not to Scale Not to Scale • SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION OF ALL TREE d , ; d 1
PROTECTION BARRIERS. ° L.a ° ,i ,9

/ V 1
Pi
z
GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ONSITE CONCRETE WASHOUT Q° m
THE NCGO1 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT STRUCTURE WITH LINER Z Z
1. Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids. ,
Implementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the construction L°„ a (�) w z z
2. Provide drip pans under any stored equipment. D D g �..r�� tactivity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handling a ,,D, sT �D o_ D�T °�n z 5 o
3. Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible,or remove leaking equipment from the > < "°"�" 26 s 2
sections of the NCGO1 Construction General Permit(Sections E and F,respectively). The ° d g°" o o z t
project. D> <D Pw �,1� �y I g
permittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by the Dio o\.D "„6 0o" joj
4. Collect all spent fluids,store in separate containers and properly dispose as �A SF nAH A-aW `"w
delegated authority having jurisdiction.All details and specifications shown on this sheet �����3r��:�
hazardous waste(recycle when possible). 9
may not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority having jurisdiction. Ir SANDBAGS °
5. Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problem "„of „°' °E�,,,S:;S.W. A-A rem...I„"m I s9G
SECTION E:GROUND STABILIZATION has been corrected. I�I ,,,,� I
SI°fl f ""�""`��0°"'"'"' µoITAom
_2 MESTRUCTURES ,° mural6. Bring used fuels,lubricants,coolants,hydraulic fluids and other petroleum products
Required Ground Stabilization Timeframes e�L „OR6",„m rni roZcaloCCUr sua INCHES OF FREEBOARD
.
to a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials.
Stabilize within this s A'°.on .oTM°"
many calendar Timeframe variations BELOW GRADE°WASHOUT STRUCTURE ABOVE GRADE°WAST TO HOUT STRUCTURE�� Z
Site Area Description days after ceasing LITTER,BUILDING MATERIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE „ „
land disturbance 1. Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers. I(a) Perimeter dikes, 2. Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers(e.g dumpster,trash CONCRETE WASHOUTSswales,ditches,and 7 None receptacle)on site to contain construction and domestic wastes. 1. Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site.
perimeter slopes 3. Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface 2. Dispose of,or recycle settled,hardened concrete residue in accordance with local
(b) High Quality Water waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available. and state solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.
None
(HOW)Zones 7 4. Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runoff 3. Manage washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above item and in
If slopes are 10'or less in length and are from upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain,stream or wetland. addition place the mixer and associated materials on impervious barrier and within
(c) Slopes steeper than p g 3:1 7 not steeper than 2:1,14 days are 5. Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events or lot perimeter silt fence.
allowed provide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers. 4. Install temporary concrete washouts per local requirements,where applicable. If an
-7 days for slopes greater than 50'in 6. Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds. alternate method or product is to be used,contact your approval authority for
length and with slopes steeper than 4:1 7. Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately if review and approval. If local standard details are not available,use one of the two
-7 days for perimeter dikes,swales, containers overflow. types of temporary concrete washouts provided on this detail.
(d) Slopes 3:1 to 4:1 14 ditches,perimeter slopes and HOW 8. Dispose waste off-site at an approved disposal facility. 5. Do not use concrete washouts for dewatering or storing defective curb or sidewalk a)
Zones 9. On business days,clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers. sections. Stormwater accumulated within the washout may not be pumped into or •i- ct
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed discharged to the storm drain system or receiving surface waters. Liquid waste must C!')
be pumped out and removed from project. '�
-7 days for perimeter dikes,swales, PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE O
ditches,perimeter slopes and HOW Zones 1. Do not dump paint and other liquid waste into storm drains,streams or wetlands. 6. Locate washouts at least 50 feet from storm drain inlets and surface waters unless it .4ct
(e) Areas with slopes can be shown that no other alternatives are reasonably available. At a minimum, ct flatter than 4:1 14 -10 days for Falls Lake Watershed unless 2. Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface install protection of storm drain inlet(s)closest to the washout which could receive bA U
there is zero slope waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available. ,.
spills or overflow. -1"' -1--
Note:After the permanent cessation of construction activities,anyareas with temporary 3. Contain liquid wastes in a controlled area. �-
p Y 7. Locate washouts in an easily accessible area,on level ground and install a stone
ground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon as 4. Containment must be labeled,sized and placed appropriately for the needs of site. entrance pad in front of the washout. Additional controls may be required by the E Z 5
practicable but in no case longer than 90 calendar days after the last land disturbing 5. Prevent the discharge of soaps,solvents,detergents and other liquid wastes from approving authority.
activity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render the construction sites.
8. Install at least one sign directing concrete trucks to the washout within the project a)
surface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved. limits. Post signage on the washout itself to identify this location.
PORTABLE TOILETS 9. Remove leavings from the washout when at approximately 75%capacity to limit Cr)
GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATION 1. Install portable toilets on levelground,at least 50 feet awayfrom storm drains, • O
Stabilize theground sufficientlyso that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of the overflow events. Replace the tarp,sand bags or other temporary structural U
g streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 foot components when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or proprietary ct
techniques in the table below: offset is not attainable,provide relocation ofportable toilet behind silt fence or place E 6
products,follow manufacturer's instructions.
II Temporary Stabilization IMENIPermanent Stabilization on a gravel pad and surround with sand bags. },
10. At the completion of the concrete work,remove remaining leavings and dispose of
•Temporary grass seed covered with straw or • Permanent grass seed covered with straw or 2. Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in high in an approved disposal facility. Fill pit,if applicable,and stabilize any disturbance S
other mulches and tackifiers other mulches and tackifiers foot traffic areas. caused by removal of washout.
• Hydroseeding •Geotextile fabrics such as permanent soil 3. Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.
• Rolled erosion control products with or reinforcement matting Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replace
without temporary grass seed • Hydroseeding with properly operating unit.
•Appropriately applied straw or other mulch •Shrubs or other permanent plantings covered HERBICIDES,PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES
• Plastic sheeting with mulch 1. Store and apply herbicides,pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with label
• Uniform and evenly distributed ground cover EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT restrictions.
sufficient to restrain erosion 1. Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen-material stockpile areas at least 2. Store herbicides,pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with the
•Structural methods such as concrete,asphalt or 50 feet away from storm drain inlets,sediment basins,perimeter sediment controls label,which lists directions for use,ingredients and first aid steps in case of
retaining walls and surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonably accidental poisoning.
• Rolled erosion control products with grass seed available.
3. Do not store herbicides,pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding is
2. Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset of possible or where they may spill or leak into wells,stormwater drains,ground water
POLYACRYLAMIDES(PAMS)AND FLOCCULANTS five feet from the toe of stockpile. or surface water. If a spill occurs,clean area immediately.
1. Select flocculants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed during 3. Provide stable stone access point when feasible. 4. Do not stockpile these materials onsite.
construction,selecting from the NC DWR List of Approved PAMS/Flocculants. 4. Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordance
2. Apply flocculants at or before the inlets to Erosion and Sediment Control Measures. with the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is defined
3. Apply flocculants at the concentrations specified in the NC DWR List of Approved as vegetative,physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain accelerated HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE
PAMS/Flocculants and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. erosion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs.
1. Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on-site.
4. Provide ponding area for containment of treated Stormwater before discharging 2. Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.
E offsite.
5. Store flocculants in leak-proof containers that are kept under storm-resistant cover 3. Do not store hazardous chemicals,drums or bagged materials directly on the ground. N N¢x o
or surrounded by secondary containment structures. c..)
NCGO1 GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19 _ z)
A E m m
^ O a▪ ` O U D9

/ V 1
cA
PART III PART III
PART III Q
SELF-INSPECTION,RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING SELF-INSPECTION,RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING SELF-INSPECTION,RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING z o 1 o m
EU' ,
SECTION A:SELF-INSPECTION SECTION B:RECORDKEEPING SECTION C:REPORTING t 1- i VAA
Self-inspections are required during normal business hours in accordance with the table 1.E&SC Plan Documentation 1.Occurrences that Must be Reported Q u
below. When adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspection The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation shall be kept on the site. The Permittees shall report the following occurrences: H w 0 H
personnel to be in jeopardy,the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on approved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date throughout the coverage under this permit. (a) Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.
which it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition,when a storm event of equal to or The following items pertaining to the E&SC plan shall be kept on site and available for
greater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours,the self-inspection shall be inspection at all times during normal business hours.
performed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspections (b) Oil spills if:
were delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record. Item to Document Documentation Requirements • They are 25 gallons or more,
Frequency (a) Each E&SC measure has been installed Initial and date each E&SC measure on a copy • They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours,
Inspect (during normal Inspection records must include: and does not significantly deviate from the of the approved E&SC plan or complete,date
business hours) locations,dimensions and relative elevations and sign an inspection report that lists each • They cause sheen on surface waters(regardless of volume),or
(1)Rain gauge Daily Daily rainfall amounts. shown on the approved E&SC plan. E&SC measure shown on the approved E&SC • They are within 100 feet of surface waters(regardless of volume).
maintained in If no daily rain gauge observations are made during weekend or
good working holiday periods, and no individual-day rainfall information is plan. This documentation is required upon the I
order available,record the cumulative rain measurement for those un- initial installation of the E&SC measures or if
attended days (and this will determine if a site inspection is the E&SC measures are modified after initial (c) Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311
needed). Days on which no rainfall occurred shall be recorded as installation. of the Clean Water Act(Ref:40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3)or Section 102 of CERCLA
"zero." The permittee may use another rain-monitoring device (b) A phase of grading has been completed. Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC (Ref:40 CFR 302.4)or G.S.143-215.85.
approved by the Division.
(2) E&SC At least once per 1. Identification of the measures inspected, plan or complete,date and sign an inspection
Measures 7 calendar days 2. Date and time of the inspection, report to indicate completion of the (d) Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.
and within 24 3. Name of the person performing the inspection, construction phase.
hours of a rain 4. Indication of whether the measures were operating
event>1.0 inch in properly, (c) Ground cover is located and installed Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
24 hours 5. Description of maintenance needs for the measure, in accordance with the approved E&SC plan or complete,date and sign an inspection (e) Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or the
6. Description,evidence,and date of corrective actions taken. plan. report to indicate compliance with approved environment.
(3)Stormwater At least once per 1. Identification of the discharge outfalls inspected, ground cover specifications.
discharge 7 calendar days 2. Date and time of the inspection,
outfalls(sons) and within 24 3. Name of the person performing the inspection, (d) The maintenance and repair Complete,date and sign an inspection report. 2.Reporting Timeframes and Other Requirements
hours of a rain 4. Evidence of indicators of stormwater pollution such as oil requirements for all E&SC measures
event 1.D inch in sheen,floating or suspended solids or discoloration, have been performed. After a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported,he shall contact ct
24 hours S. Indication of visible sediment leaving the site, the appropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the cj
6. evidence,and date of corrective actions taken.Description, (e) Corrective actions have been taken Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
p other requirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be � -51
(4)Perimeter of At least once per If visible sedimentation is found outside site limits,then a record to E&SC measures. plan or complete,date and sign an inspection Q
site 7 calendar days of the following shall be made: report to indicate the completion of the reported to the Department's Environmental Emergency Center personnel at(800) O ;.,.I
and within 24 1. Actions taken to clean up or stabilize the sediment that has left corrective action.
U 858-0368.
hours of a rain the site limits,
event>1.0 inch in 2. Description,evidence,and date of corrective actions taken,and 2.Additional Documentation to be Kept on Site Occurrence Reporting Timeframes(After Discovery]and Other Requirements }, ,_
24 hours 3. An explanation as to the actions taken to control future In addition to the E&SCplan documents above,the followingitems shall be kept on the
P p (a)visible sediment + WftlNnl4[mats.an oral or electronic notification. i--1
releases. site and available for inspectors at all times during normal business hours,unless the deposition in-a • Within 7calendar days,a report that contains a description of the 0 •
rn
(5)Streams or At least once per lithe stream or wetland has increased visible sedimentation ore Division provides a site-specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make stream or wetland sediment and actionstaken to address the cause of the deposition. E
wetlands onsite 7 calendar days stream has visible increased turbidity from the construction
or offsite and within 24 activity,then a record of the following shall be made: this requirement not practical: Clikelsicr staff may waive the requirement for a written report rt ,..iona /-�
(where hours of a rain 1. Description,evidence and date of corrective actions taken,and CdSe-bycase basis. ty I--i
accessible) event>1.0 inch in 2. Records of the required reports to the appropriate Division (a) This General Permit as well as the Certificate of Coverage,after it is received. - IF the strccm is nomcd an the NC 303(d1 list as impaired far rcdimcnt- y
24 hours Regional Office per Part Ill,Section C,Item(2)(a)of this permit. related causes,the permitter may he required to perform additional Cr)
(6)Ground After each phase 1. The phase of grading(installation of perimeter E&SC monitoring,inspections or apply more stringent practices tf staff ro
stabilization of grading measures,clearing and grubbing,installation of storm (b) Records of inspections made during the previous twelve months. The permittee shall ft
--.1measures drainage facilities,completion of all land-disturbing record the required observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the tEeterrrtirte that additional requirements are needed ttrassure compliance
activity,construction or redevelopment,permanent with the federal er state impaired waters conditions.
Division or a similar inspection form that includes all the required elements. Use ofE a)
ground cover). (b)oil wilts and • Within 24 haws,an oral or electronic notlflwtion.The notification to
electronically-available records in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowed if 4
2. Documentation that the required ground stabilization release of shall inciude inforrnatiort about the date,time,nature,volume and
provided within the required
measures have beenshown to provide equal access and utility as the hard-copyrecords.
hazardous location gr the gpiAoirelea5e. .
timeframe or an assurance that they will be provided as substances per'teal
soon as possible. 3.Documentation to be Retained for Three Years 1(b)-(c)above
All data used to complete the e-NOI and all inspection records shall be maintained for a period (cl Anticipated • 4 report or least ten days before the dote of the bypass,ifpaxsibie.
NOTE:The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar day inspection requirement. of three years after project completion and made available upon request. [40 CFR 122.41] bypasses[gGCFR The report shad Include anevaluadon of the anticpated quality and
Lz2.4l(m)(31i_ etfectof the bypass.
PART II,SECTION G,ITEM(4) OP Unanticipated • Withat a4 hours,an oral or electronrc notification.
DRAW DOWN OF SEDIMENT BASINS FOR MAINTENANCE OR CLOSE OUT bypasses 141}CFR • Within 7wlendcr days,a repartthatinctudes an evaluation of the
122.41(m)(3it queirtyanal effect of the bypass.
le)Noncompliance • Within Z4 hours,an oral or electronic notification.
Sediment basins and traps that receive runoff from drainage areas of one acre or more shall use outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface when these devices need to be drawn down with the conditions • Within7calendar days,a report that contains a description of the
for maintenance or close out unless this is infeasible. The circumstances in which it is not feasible to withdraw water from the surface shall be rare(for example,times with extended cold weather). of this permit that aone=ph once,and its causes;the period of noncompliance,
Non-surface withdrawals from sediment basins shall be allowed only when all of the following criteria have been met: may endanger including eltact dates and times,and if the noncompliance has not
health or the been corrected,the snticipated time noncompliance is eKp acted to
(a) The E&SC plan authority has been provided with documentation of the non-surface withdrawal and the specific time periods or conditions in which it will occur. The non-surface withdrawal environment140 continues and steps taken or planned to reduce,eliminate,andCFR 122.41It)(719 prevent reoccurrence of the nonraripiiance.(40 CFR 122.41(I)(6).
o shall not commence until the E&SC plan authority has approved these items, • Division staff may waive the requirement for a written report ono
(b) The non-surface withdrawal has been reported as an anticipated bypass in accordance with Part III,Section C,Item(2)(c)and(d)of this permit, rase-trytase basis.
(c) Dewatering discharges are treated with controls to minimize discharges of pollutants from stormwater that is removed from the sediment basin. Examples of appropriate controls include
properly sited,designed and maintained dewatering tanks,weir tanks,and filtration systems,
(d) Vegetated,upland areas of the sites or a properly designed stone pad is used to the extent feasible at the outlet of the dewatering treatment devices described in Item(c)above,
' (e) Velocity dissipation devices such as check dams,sediment traps,and riprap are provided at the discharge points of all dewatering devices,and m w u o
(f) Sediment removed from the dewatering treatment devices described in Item(c)above is disposed of in a manner that does not cause deposition of sediment into waters of the United States. ,¢x
Ii
NCGO1 SELF-INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING EFFECTIVE: 04/O1/19
A E ,, m
XZ , , 9 1�i

NOTES: \/
cA 6"MIN-12"MAX 1 STRAND OF
_ 2"PAINTED 1. THE FENCE SHALL MEET CLASSIFICATION FOR 949-12 FIXED KNOT
TUBE STEEL GATE I -CLASS 1 BARBED WIRE 12.5 GAUGE HIGH TENSILE WOVEN WIRE.
OR CLASS 3 BARBED WIRE 15.5 GAUGE cn ,
P. GATE POST _r GATE POST - 2. WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LIVESTOCK SIDE OF THE FENCE. Q
q_5 3. MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN LINE POSTS SHALL BE 12 FEET ON 1 0 m
t �,� CENTER AND SET AT LEAST 30 INCHES INTO THE GROUND. z �ry E,o
949-12 FIXED KNOT 4. ALL CORNERS,FENCE LINE ENDS,AND GATE OPENINGS ALONG U
HIGH TENSILE WOVEN WIRE z o
12.5 GAUGE WITH ZINC COATING WOVEN WIRE FENCING REQUIRE H BRACE ASSEMBLIES.CORNER z 0
6" OR PULL POST ASSEMBLY SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRAIGHT Q-
6" FENCE SECTIONS NOT TO EXCEED 324'ON LEVEL LAND OR AT z o H
6" OTHER POINTS OF CHANGES IN SLOPES AND CURVES. �'"w "'
c - 5fl_ 3.5"TYP DIA WOODEN POST 5. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON
L/ GROUND LINE _2-3 ----- ----------- - PRESSURE TREATED PINE FENCING.
GATE POST ANCHOR J 5„ NOTALL.POSTS AND BRACES MAYBE EITHER ROUND OR SQUARE I 7 I I OR BLACK LOCUST
4'or 16'
- AT THE OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR,PROVIDED THE SAME I I 30
Access Gate } TYPE IS USED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. I
3'MIN
IIII2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE THE DIAMETER OF ROUND OR EDGE Lr 12'MAX -�
DIMENSIONS OF SQUARE POSTS AND BRACES.
3. ERECT LINE BRACES BETWEEN END,CORNER OR GATE POSTS. Line Post Assembly '�,
PLACE LINE BRACES AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 300'AN AT 5"-6"DIAMETER VERTICAL BRACE POSTS
18"MIN THE END OF THE BARBED WIRE ROLL. VERTICAL 12"X 3/8" 4"-5" DIAMETER BRACE POSTS
DOWEL
Detail of Gate 4. THE 300'INTERVAL MAY BE REDUCED BY THE ENGINEER ON BRACE POST I_, g� _I TWITCH STICK
CURVES WHERE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE IS GREATER 1 _ PRESSURE TREATED PINE / I
Post Anchor THAN 3 DEGREES. 6"X 3/8" - , OR BLACK LOCUST -
USE CLASS"B"CONCRETE AT GATE 5. NOTCH BRACE POSTS 1"MINIMUM FOR HORIZONTAL BRACES. DOWEL
POSTS OR WHERE REQUIRED BY PLACE TWO GALVANIZED 12d OR THREE GALVANIZED 10d
SOIL CONDITIONS.CONCRETE MAY NAILS AT EACH END OF ALL BRACES. 8'-0"MIN
ALSO BE USED IN LIEU OF SETTING 6. PLACE THE BRACE WIRE AROUND THE POST.DRAW ALL BRACE .-�
CURVED TO FIT WIRE TAUT BY TWISTING BETWEEN EACH POST. i
-II-5/8" DIAMETER OF FRAME POSTS TO THEIR MAXIMUM DEPTH.
�- 8'MIN 42"MIN
7. INSTALL THE FENCE FACING THE PROPERTY OWNER EXCEPT
CURVED TO FIT J�� � ' THAT ON HORIZONTAL CURVES GREATER THAN THREE -_ --
"" DIAMETER OF --\ `=°o DEGREES(3°)INSTALL THE FENCE TO PULL AGAINST ALL ----____ 6, � i'J
BOLT HING POSTS.SEE NCDOT STD.866.02 FOR FENCING AT DITCH 47/ �
Bolt Hinge Hinge ClampCROSSINGS,BREAKS IN GRADES AND R/W BREAKS. N q,"�
(2 Required) 2 Required) 8. USE LATCH DEVICE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.HINGE 42 TWO WRAPS OF 12.5 GAUGE HIGH TENSILE WIRE
( q CORNER POST 5"MIN ON TOP CO
ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN IS SUGGESTED.SUBSTITUTION MAY BE OR 1 WRAP OF 9 GAUGE HIGH TENSILE WIRE y ct
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.USED 2"PAINTED I AND 8"MIN ON BOTTOM
Hinge Assembly STEEL PIPE FOR GATE FRAME EXCEPT AS SHOWN HERE. Corner Braces ^ i
9. ANY COMBINATION OF GATE AND FENCE TYPE MEETING THE Single Span"H"Brace Assembly USE WHEN CORNER ANGLE IS 160°OR LESS 0
2"Tube Steel Gate APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE AND IS NOT (MAXIMUM SPACING 324') ®Woven Wire Fence ' It
Not to Scale LIMITED TO THE EXAMPLES SHOWN HEREON. U
Not to Scale
a--C
(16')2"TUBE STEEL GATE 5-STRAND,12.5 GAUGE,ELECTRIC WIRE FIBERGLASS OR z '~
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.10.
WITH TENSILE RATING OF 170K PSI OTHER APPROVED
AND WIRE TENSION OF 200 LBS CI.)
GATE SHOULD CLOSE OFF EASEMENT - - INSULATED POST
ACCESS WHEN CROSSING IS IN USE. HORIZONTAL BRACE //
2.5"DIA.GALVANIZED PIPE OR /3.5"DIA.LINE POST C!')
--- 4' DIA.TREATED WOOD
12.5 GUAGE MINft U
SINGLE STRAND 30-34" E
GALVANIZED
f
V7
_ _ STEEL WIRE OR _ 4 4
10" APPROVED
GROUND WIRE ALTERNATE.
10"APPROXIMATE + y SPACED TO MAINTAIN if
_
WIRE HEIGHT -
HEIGHT=44" $
- - - 7'r
GROUND WIRE Line Braces
------ I I -'''''''''-,,,_APPROXIMATE
I I 24"MIN.FOR LINE POSTS I I WIRE SPACING(TYP.)
48"MIN.FOR BRACE POSTS
L� ' J 30'MAX SPACING
NOTES:
FIBERGLASS OR
1. THE FENCE SHALL BE BUILT ACCORDING TO THE NRCS SPECIFICATION 382 FOR 5-STRAND ELECTRIC WIRE HIGH TENSILE FENCE.(APRIL 2008) OTHER APPROVD
INSULATED POST
2. WIRE SHALL BE 12.5 GAUGE,CLASS 3 GALVANIZED ZINC(ASTM-116 STANDARD)WITH 170,000 PSI TENSILE STRENGTH.WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LIVESTOCK
3 SIDE OF THE FENCE.
3. LINE POSTS SHALL BE 3.5"DIA.PRESSURE TREATED WOOD WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 30 FEET AND A MINIMUM POST HEIGHT OF 68".
3 4. BRACE POSTS SHALL BE 4" DIA.DIAMETER AND SET 48"INTO THE GROUND.HORIZONTAL BRACE POSTS SHALL BE 2.5"DIA.GALVANIZED PIPE OR 4"DIA.PRESSURE
TREATED WOOD.
cl
5. BRACING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TABLE BELOW:
PULL DISTANCE END/CORNER/GATE BRACE SPECIFICATION INLINE BRACE SPECIFICATION =
J c
<660 FEET SINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLY NOT REQUIRED
E
(16')2"TUBE STEEL GATE S "'w U °'
660-2,000 FEET SINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLY SINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLY /� o U O
= SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.11. giNTCF0 12.5 GUAGE MIN ,,,,¢x U
GATE SHOULD CLOSE OFF CROSSING y '9/N TO SINGLE STRAND j o
WHEN NOT IN USE. >2,000 FEET DOUBLE H OR DOUBLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLY SINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLY o ,,,/ GALVANIZED
STEEL WIRE OR
6. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON FENCING. APPROVED /'�
ALTERNATE. " �L�
s flp Fence Layout at Crossings High Tensile Electric Wire Fence Corner Brace E
Not to Scale d z - 1
x 1 Not to Scale O.
J`

/ V 1
z
2 Q
z� �o
�z�
10"f 10" t Q 1' o
i i t r H a
2 2 w <2
FILL FACErq
T5 @ 6' TOP AND BOTTOM • /—FILL FACE
1'11" N1 @ 8"
4 3 @ WING WALL
1 '
29
V1@ 1'4" Z
@ WING WALL 111 r . pir T4 I
16"Z 1
16 1
Z2
10" ®�I I
T4
iii 8��_ TS @ 6" `8��
45°TYP.S011.*0 h, 5"
• 10'TYP. . SECTION AA
4 T4 Z3 SECTION BB
1 5 SPA.@ 9"2-N2,
2g 2-N3,2-N4 ,1-1
TDI
10" Ct U
biD
3'_ /�
y PLAN
o
BILL OF MATERIAL FOR ENDWALL E z g
8
REINF.STEEL
CP BAR SIZE LENGTH rQ
8'6" — y SPA.@ 9"FILL FACE B1 #4 5'-6" ft v
N2,M3,N4/— E 6GL SPA.@ 1'6" B2 #4 4'-6"
H2 ujy
BILL FACE
NiN1 @ 8"FILL FACE G1 #4 8'-2" S
Y2,V3,V4
V2 H1 #4 5'-6"
V1 STR.FACE N2 H2 #4 3'-6"
1
} N 1 #4 7'-11"
2 4"J� \JJJ \ B2 SPA.@ 1'9" N4 N2 #4 6'-7"
/
1 / \\ STR.FACE H1,H2
SPA.@ 1'2"FI LL V4 N3 #4 5'-8"
36" \ FACE H1,H2 N4 #4 4'-9"
6'10" i �H1
T1 #4 11'-10"
z" T4 #4 5'-3"
o
1' o o TS #4 E
T4 z
Fd
EXISTING PIPE INV.
WING ELEVATION V3 #4 3'-11"
B V4 #4 3'-1" c
Z1 #4 3'-11"
E
Z2 #4 3-6" P m u '
ELEVATION ,r co
p Z3 #4 3'-1"
11
ll
1 Reinforced Concrete Endwall
x 6.13 Not to Scale . z Eg 1
J`

/ '\ ...\,... 1
P.
z .
kik. '''''''
40 r,o,
<O%� N/FN. z
O _ JERRY A.
z �
and \ Q 6 °'- ''
EEL GATE DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON N. 1 z 'g d H a
IEET 6.12 V D.B.0668,PG.110
PIN:4827-97-1287 w
A
s
x° &.?'� / / No*
�� CONNECT TO /�
/ • EXISTING FENCE 1 1
\ \\ ^ / OJT'J��\ REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE OF -�/ 0 0�` ) 4'STEEL GATE 1'
N/F
/ JERRY A. OJ O \ CONSERVATION EASEMENT(TYP). G�' ,y4i / SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12
/ and �\\30'WIDE DUKE ENERGY a .
DEBRA LYNN \(
�� �,\ UTILITY EASEMENT �"�' 'S 0
j D.B.0621,PG.14 OJJ J<<' (DB 0194,PG 054) \ �� , ��,
•
\ \"-...,,,..., PIN:4827-96-5044 O O .:�
\ J�'// NOT TO DISTURB \- \v/ : .
%i \
o \ , O OJ/ EXISTING FENCE y \
'''''''\ 0 �_ � \\�� OUTSIDE OFCE� /�'/ O�� / ► • \
11
\ S.MARK O .. �
- J MICHELLECU
dR.CASS \-t�y011- y \
c' \ (.'' \OJT I `' PIN:4827-95-4754 , •
�1e CONSERVATION EASEMENT(TYP).REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE F f ••�•
�` \\ O
•
G \ •. ct,
, „‘ • . -_-.• \• r
1111/4
OGfiF 'S'00 - 1 i ) by ,,' \\ .
d00\\ 4'STEEL GATE • f N. ��:\ � xo�••..� ••• / •M. ;-I j
SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12 i� +— n 10 1: �" �,, \AH
N
4'STEEL GATE O - ,;, / _ \f- :� •. / `, �" 4'STEEL GATE 8 to
SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12 \ ���• CONNECT FENCE TO \ j SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12 �„•�
�O\ C‘ CATTLE GRATE BRIDGE\ \ % 49. ' ,4,. +� S •CI
p`)p / / \220+00 14 �'' • 4'STEEL GATE \ CP
O
O OLN A Ilk .0' - SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12 '� \ �y r , f�
V
/ -V. ( Aillik •.-1
cn
F
30'WIDE DUKE ENERGY OGO / O •... / f310+00 \ F�-•I
UTILITY EASEMENT \O( , x0 �,•, * 4'STEEL GATE c�,'# �, Ri fl
(DB 0602,PG 329) Q,� O1 , *• J +'.~ �Q� SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12 �► -�, �� e Tr
\ / • b
Y \ , v~ �O �� far
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE OF ,�\ i O , JERRY A. iiirS
CONSERVATION EASEMENT(TYP). / and
( ) o 4. :
} ,�' DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON 'I _ _ oo �` :: Z50+00
•
D.B.0986,PG.193 'cP° o �' `'t
N/F / • O PIN:4827-94-1858 :O m
JERRY A. /i G ,I_ 2-8'STEELGATES Off" �.�
and / SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET 6.12 S'
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON } • /, O\ �,. ' „
D.B.0653,PG.160 •j �j $, rt
PIN:4827-95-0384 / \\O \\ 4` �G
\ } �' OGe 0„, \ 4'STEEL GATE
\O �, , O\ SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12
% O G \OJ 4'STEEL
(' •
\70 ♦ p O SEE DET,
cl WITHIN CONSERVATION EASEMENT OOG\,�J\ 4'STEEL GATE
TRIM EXISTING FENCE APPROXIMATELY _o r: G O SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12
30 FEET FROM CONFLUENCE AND LEAVE +� F\J� _
\ THE REMAINING FENCE o HIGH TENSILE FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IN CROSSING c
E �,'-�r'1 J' _ 4'STEEL GATE 1111111
= JERRYA. SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET 6.12 // ry¢ O
\ and / O
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
N/F D.B.0653,PG.160
WILLIAMJODYGRAY PIN:4827-84-8574
D.B.1087,PG.105 / w
0' 100' 150' 200' PIN:4827-75-8017 /°° w
_
(HORIZONTAL) m
/ z ,, a 1
/ — �1 7 �� asp