NC0030465_Complete File - Historical_20171231

� .
--------�---- ----'------_-----_---_---�--____-__-__ -- !�
-_ -----�---------------l'�-----'---
. .`
-
____--------
------ ___'________�`______�_____^�__�________________________________
71
YN
� �_-

FROM MARTINS MEATS ,PHONE NO. 910 567 y. 5241 Feb. 21 2000 10:22AM F1
. .
. �:���iVf•%r®bac�:La�r�t®ties, �rico
;? B17 CA9TLit '.iD►Xf': Rss� VC •37714
r
;.20303: USDA 03707
:t910} ®6i-192i`;'%:(9]0}a.
http://wwvv.naicrobac.cazn
Y • WCROBIOLOGY a FOOD SA -My - CONSuhm PRODUCTS
CBU7'ICALS
CERT 928796
Cli6tl4': Nsstito•a Abattoir, Inc. ��DIAXTS &SC•D: 12/29/99 SAMPL®: 12/28/99
71DDR=SSs 1600 Martin Rid S71?OPEdD BY: C1ia►At
Cob+in, IIC . 20348. . - DBLIV:ROD BY: 'Client
C.MAAST P=W: Mr. � W. C. Martin SAMPLS CODS: Waste water, grab
:' .:.:'., :YM1, .AIaO'OUiR Mt�s11s M101016 _ Rs�L�i � 110N-OColRLIAliCB .
S7 WtB ID: 1. sii. (B#dge i6) back -comer 02 - ID 099MI120077
2.140 into 02 -.ID S09Mx128878
3. Kill Floor - YD 009=119079
P
DATA R:VIDW BY:
LyL
ASS ?SD:
{{�4{{+{1+{{{{{*{{{{{++{{p{Oi++{i{4++i+ii{{+oi+{A+{{+{{+{i+
_....
�{+{{i+{{aa{a►r+a►ai{ia•wasra:
AMALYSZS
DSilS�
1
2
{+{{{++a+++aa{aa�aaaar++3raaaaa•a
:. BOD
SPA 405.1
f '97.6
334
191I
COD 6nglL)
SPA 510.4.:.
222
9a0
MOO
G03.I8OM TOTAL -(per. 1,00 al) '
Sm8 9222a
<1
<1
<1
Nl?ROGBII, A!!�0ltl]I (�g/L}
SPA 350.2
I 67.52
157. �2
265.29
K"PRrOMM" 2WAL VJNIJVAL (24/0
BPIF 251. Z
! i
' 2.24
I
,
Z07.24
33s.-"
OIL i GRs7lSs (w8/L)
aPJ1 413.1
'' .0.1
SM
`.
In 150.1
7.6
7.35
6. 8
SOLIDS, TOME 9(b98�i1= .(wg/L) .
iiPil
i 6i.8
'258.2
0276.1
. o
O ✓ �B
� .
C � L L�-

DIVISION OF ENVIROWNTAL W&WIT
Nay 4, 1976'
Mr. Janos Bringle
James Pringle, Inc.
Route 1, lox 549-A
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
wastewater Facilities
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Bringle:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Conqlk= Evaluation IMSPOctiOn ;depart
conducted an Kay 3, 108 5j Mr. Bill Coppadye of Wa Worcsville Regional
Office.
.The Report is sslf-oxplanatory. In sirmary. U: Rupark stahad that James
Iringle, Inc. has installed a nun-dischargs land application sYsteW in Place
of the systy dasorlbod ia Paruit Mo. AC 0530165. The Pormit for this systam
is being processod Vy this Division.
Should you hava any hostions, pluase contact Mr. Cappedge or Or. Larry
Coble at the h2law address.
Sincerely,
OR,�liAL B�
D. Rex Gleason
Regional Engineer
cc: Mr! Paul J. Train:_}, EPA
Rowk County health Departnent
Enclosure
WWQss

ca111
OMB No. 158 - R0073
-
NPDES COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT (Coding Instructions on back of last page)
ANSACTION
INSPEC-
FAC
TIME
CODE
NPDES YR MO
DA TYPE
TOR
TYPE
H 15 L_I I" I I
1 2
3 11 12
17 18
19
20a.m.
.m.
REMARKS
_'i�-I• I• --I' I'
r`
I� I �''I��I:-I I%"I�fI' I I/�I I%"I�'�'� I', I% t-'It.
Ir�'I%.�li.li'I�
I I;i•I'
I' I �I �� � �'
ADDITIONAL
65 70
SECTION A - Permit Summary
NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY (Include County, State and ZIP code) EXPIRATION DATE
IISSUANCE.DATE
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL TITLE PHONE
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE TITLE PHONE
• jL
SECTION B - Effluent Characteristics (Additional sheets attached )
PARAMETER/
OUTFACE MINIMUM AVERAGE III= MAXIMUM ADDITIONAL
SAMPLE
MEASUREMENT
PERMIT
REQUIREMENT
SAMPLE
MEASUREMENT
PERMIT
REQUIREMENT
SAMPLE
MEASUREMENT
PERMIT
REQUIREMENT
SAMPLE
MEASUREMENT
PERMIT
REQUIREMENT
SAMPLE
MEASUREMENT
PERMIT
REQUIREMENT
SECTION C - Facility Evaluation (S= Satisfactory, U= Unsatisfactory, NIA
= Not applicable)
:1
EFFLUENT WITHIN PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
RECORDS AND REPORTS
MPLIAE SCHEDULE
rFLOWMENACSURE
LABORATORY PRACTICES
'.?
PERMIT VERIFICATION
MENTS
OTHER:
SECTION D -Comments
SECTION E - Inspection/ Review
isll:ity>=:':.
SIGNATURES
AGENCY
DATE
INSPECTED BY;'ii{IphFGES'f`Tr'?
a. 1, = r'
.i
INSPECTED BY i
t
REVIEWED BY
rvnrvi 1-01 vvrtiL;n IS OBSOLETE. PAGE 1 OF 4

Form Approved
nup Ivn_ Y aP, - i?nn7a
fictions F thru L: Complete on all inspections, as appropriate. N/A = Not Applicable
PERMIT NO.
SECTION F - Facility and Permit Background
ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE IF DIFFERENT FROM FACILITY
DATE OF LAST PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION BY EPA/STATE
(Including City, County and ZIP code)
FINDINGS
SECTION G - Records and Reports
RECORDS AND REPORTS MAINTAINED AS REQUIRED BY PERMIT. ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A (Further explanation attached
DETAILS:
(a) ADEQUATE RECORDS MAINTAINED OF:
(i) SAMPLING DATE, TIME, EXACT LOCATION
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(II) ANALYSES DATES TIMES
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(III) INDIVIDUAL PERFORMING ANALYSIS
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(iv) ANALYTICAL METHODS/TECHNIQUES USED
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(v) ANALYTICAL RESULTS (e.g., consistent with self -monitoring report data)
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(b) MONITORING RECORDS (e.g.,flow, pH, D.O., etc.) MAINTAINED FOR A MINIMUM OF THREE YEARS
INCLUDING ALL ORIGINAL STRIP CHART RECORDINGS (e.g. continuous monitoring instrumentation,
calibration and. maintenance records).
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(c) LAB EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS KEPT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(d) FACILITY OPERATING RECORDS KEPT INCLUDING OPERATING LOGS FOR EACH TREATMENT UNIT. Cl YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(e) QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS KEPT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(f) RECORDS MAINTAINED OF MAJOR CONTRIBUTING INDUSTRIES (and their compliance status) USING
PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
SECTION H - Permit Verification
INSPECTION OBSERVATIONS VERIFY THE PERMIT. ❑YES NO ❑N/A (Further explanation attached
)
DETAILS:
(a) CORRECT NAME AND MAI LING ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(b) FACILITY IS AS DESCRIBED IN PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(c) PRINCIPAL PRODUCT(S) AND PRODUCTION RATES CONFORM WITH THOSE SET FORTH IN PERMIT
APPLICATION.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(d) TREATMENT PROCESSES ARE AS DESCRIBED IN PERMIT APPLICATION.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(e) NOTIFICATION GIVEN TO EPA/STATE OF NEW, DIFFERENT OR INCREASED DISCHARGES.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(f) ACCURATE RECORDS OF RAW WATER VOLUME MAINTAINED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(g) NUMBER AND LOCATION OF DISCHARGE POINTS ARE AS DESCRIBED IN PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(h) CORRECT NAME AND LOCATION OF RECEIVING WATERS.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(i) ALL DISCHARGES ARE PERMITTED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
SECTION I - Operation and Maintenance
TREATMENT FACILITY PROPERLY OPERATED AND MAINTAINED. ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A (Further explanation attached
DETAILS:
(a) STANDBY POWER OR OTHER EQUIVALENT PROVISIONS PROVIDED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(b) ADEQUATE ALARM SYSTEM FOR POWER OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES AVAILABLE.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(c) REPORTS ON ALTERNATE SOURCE OF POWER SENT TO EPA/STATE AS REQUIRED BY PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(d) SLUDGES AND SOLIDS ADEQUATELY DISPOSED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(e) ALLTREATMENT UNITS IN SERVICE.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(f) CONSULTING ENGINEER RETAINED OR AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION ON OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(g) QUALIFIED OPERATING STAFF PROVIDED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(h) ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES AVAILABLE FOR TRAINING NEW OPERATORS.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(1) FILES MAINTAINED ON SPARE PARTS INVENTORY, MAJOR EQUIPMENTSPEC] FICATIDNS, AND
PARTS AND EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(j) INSTRUCTIONS FILES KEPT FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EACH ITEM OF MAJOR
EQUIPMENT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(k) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL MAINTAINED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
I) SPCC PLAN AVAILABLE.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
m) REGULATORY AGENCY NOTIFIED OF BY PASSING. Dates
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(n) ANY BY-PASSING SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(0) ANY HYDRAULIC AND/OR ORGANIC OVERLOADS EXPERIENCED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
%W-/ Ij PAGE 2 OF 4

rorm Approvea
OMB Mo. 158 - R0073
E R M I T NO.
SECTION J - Compliance Schedules
PERMITTEE IS MEETING COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE. ❑YES ONO ❑N/A (Further explanation attached
J
CHECK APPROPRIATE PHASE(S):
❑ (a) THE PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED THE NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM THE APPROPRIATE
AUTHORITIES TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.
❑ (b) PROPER ARRANGEMENT HAS BEEN MADE FOR FINANCING (mortgage commitments, grants, etc.).
❑ (c) CONTRACTS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES HAVE BEEN EXECUTED.
❑ (d) DESIGN PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
❑ (e) CONSTRUCTION HAS COMMENCED.
❑ (f) CONSTRUCTION AND/OR EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION IS ON SCHEDULE.
❑ (g) CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
❑ (h) START-UP HAS COMMENCED.
❑ (i) THE PERMITTEE HAS REQUESTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME.
SECTION K - Self -Monitoring Program
Part 1 — Flow measurement (Further explanation attached _ J
PERMITTEE FLOW MEASUREMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑WA
DETA I LS:
(a) PRIMARY MEASURING DEVICE PROPERLY INSTALLED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
TYPE OF DEVICE: ❑WEIR ❑PARSHALL FLUME ❑MAGMETER ❑VENTURI METER ❑OTHER
(Specify
(b) CALIBRATION FREQUENCY ADEQUATE.(Date oflastcalibration
❑ YES
ElNO
❑N/A
(c) PRIMARY FLOW MEASURING DEVICE PROPERLY OPERATED AND MAINTAINED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
(d)SECONDARY INSTRUMENTS (totalizers, recorders, etc.) PROPERLY OPERATED AND MAINTAINED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(e) FLOW MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT ADEQUATE TO HANDLE EXPECTED RANGES OF FLOW RATES.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
Part 2 — Sampling (Further explanation attached )
PERMITTEE SAMPLING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
. DETAI LS:
(a) LOCATIONS ADEQUATE FOR REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(b) PARAMETERS AND SAMPLING FREQUENCY AGREE WITH PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(c) PERMITTEE IS USING METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION REQUIRED BY PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
IF NO ❑ GRAB ❑ MANUAL COMPOSITE ❑ AUTOMATIC COMPOSITE FREQUENCY
(d) SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCEDURES ARE ADEQUATE.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A'
(i) SAMPLES REFRIGERATED DURING COMPOSITING
❑ YES
❑ NO
60 PROPER PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES USED
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(iii) FLOW PROPORTIONED SAMPLES OBTAINED WHERE REQUIRED BY PERMIT
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(iv) SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES PRIOR TO ANALYSES IN CONFORMANCE WITH 40 CFR 136.3
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(e) MONITORING AND ANALYSES BEING PERFORMED MORE FREQUENTLY THAN REQUIRED BY
PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(f) IF (e) IS YES, RESULTS ARE REPORTED IN PERMITTEE'S SELF -MONITORING REPORT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
El N/A
Part 3 — Laboratory (Further explanation attached J
PERMITTEE LABORATORY PROCEDURES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE PERMIT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
DETA I LS:
(a) EPA APPROVED ANALYTICAL TESTING PROCEDURES USED. (40 CFR 136.3)
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(b) IF ALTERNATE ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ARE USED, PROPER APPROVAL HAS BEEN OBTAINED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(c) PARAMETERS OTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT ARE ANALYZED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑N/A
(d) SATISFACTORY CALIBRATION AND MAINTENANCE OF INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(e) QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES USED.
❑ YES
12 NO
❑ N/A
(f) DUPLICATE SAMPLES ARE ANALYZED. % OF TIME.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(g) SPIKED SAMPLES ARE USED. % OF TIME.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(h) COMMERCIAL LABORATORY USED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
(i) COMMERCIAL LABORATORY STATE CERTIFIED.
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑ N/A
LAB NAME
LAB ADDRESS
tF'A FORM 3560-3 (9-77) PAGE 3 OF 4

Form Approved
OMB No. 158 - R0093
:S PERMIT NO.
<;v;:% :: i : ? :<:'s Y :•`: :i : :::? .............. :::'':':Y:: ; :' :.'•:' :::;;`.;::; :;: %' iSi:$ ::::::: ::'::: ::':::::::::: 2Y:C:: >::: i ::::'::::; % :::';:; ::: ?: ;:�i:: �:::':k :%::::::5;: `:;::
SECTION L - Effluent/Receiving Water Observations (Further explanation attached )
OUTFALL NO. OILSHEEN GREASE TURBIDITY VISIBLE VISIBLE COLOR OTHER
FOAM FLOATSOL
(Sections M and N: Complete as appropriate for sampling inspections)
SECTION M - Sampling Inspection Procedures and Observations (Further explanation attached J
❑ GRAB SAMPLES OBTAINED
❑ COMPOSITE OBTAINED
❑ FLOW PROPORTIONED SAMPLE
❑ AUTOMATIC SAMPLER USED
❑ SAMPLE SPLIT WITH PERMITTEE
❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY EMPLOYED
❑ SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM FACILITY SAMPLING DEVICE
COMPOSITING FREQUENCY PRESERVATION
SAMPLE REFRIGERATED DURING COMPOSITING: El YES El NO
SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVE OF VOLUME AND NATURE OF DISCHARGE
SECTION N - Analytical Results (Attach report if necessary)
EPA Form 3560-3 (9-77) PAGE 4 OF 4

y
A North Ca-rd,ina-Department of Natural
Resourbe,4-'-
­'14
P 6*unity '
elopment
• rr-1 - Howard N. Lee, Secretary
April 3, 1978
Mr. James E. Bringle, President
James Bringle, Incorporated -
Route 1 Box 549A �" ^
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
__....... PROJECT: James Bringle, Incorporated
Butchering and Processing Plant
Salisbury, N. C. - Rowan County
Dear Mr. Bringle:
Receipt of the following documents submitted for the above project is
hereby acknowledged:
X Application for a Permit
X Detailed Engineering Plans
Specifications
X Other Staff Report
You will be advised of any recommendations, comments or other matters to be
resolved, should this be necessary, - prior to the issuance of a permit. The plans
submitted will be reviewed with respect to the wastewater treatment facilities pro-
posed for immediate construction and does not in any manner commit this Department
to approving any expansion of the treatment plant or increase in volume of wastewater
to be discharged from the plant at any future time.
Review of the submitted documents will be held in abeyance pending receipt
of the following:
Application for a Permit*
Detailed Engineering Plans
Specifications
Recommendations of Regional Engineer
Other
*I£ checked, Application Forms are enclosed which should be filled out in accordance
with the instruction on the Application and mailed to: Division of Environmental Manage-
ment, Water Quality Section, Permits and Engineering Branch, P. 0. Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611.
Sincerely,
`. 's t ��
W. S. Hoffman, Head
'� Permits and Engineering Branch
Cc:" llr. Rex Gleason Water Quality Section
Mr. Steve Rogers
Enclosures
WSH/im
P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

James E. Bringle, Inc.
Route 1, Box 5494
Salisbury, North Carolina; 28144
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Bringle: N
DIVISION Or ENVIRONMENTAL 14ANAGEMENT
October 9, 1978
James E. Bringle, Inc.
Cattle Butchering and Processing Plant
Spray Irrigation Wastewater System
Salisbury, North_Carolina
Rowan Coaiity
Reference is made to your application received March 21, 1978, for a
non -discharge permit to construct and operate facilitie9 to serve the James
E. Bringle, Inc. Plant in Salisbury, North Carolina.
As specified in a letter dated May 19, 1978,-and subsequent phone conver-
sations, you were advised to submit technical.information requested in a
April 21, 1978, letter from the Engineering Unit within sixty (60) days,
or the project would be returned as incomplete. Since this sixty (60) day
period has elapsed without the receipt of any information from you,_the
Division of Environmental Management must return your application package
as incomplete in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
The documents will be'returned under separate cover.
When you have obtained the required information, the subject project
application and plan documents can be resubmitted for review action.
Sincerely yours,_
Ord G&OWA Is
A. X. J16"P'1G
A. F. McRorie
Director
EncloXure
cc: VDick Peace
Steve C. Rogers

NORTH CAROLINA Commission Members
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D.L. Coburn
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATORS Chairman
Ray E. Shaw, Jr.
James B. Hunt, Jr.
CERTIFICATION COMMISSION Vice Chairman
V
Governor P. O. Box 27687 Mary 011ie Bumgarner
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 J. Earl Daniels
Howard N. Lee Telephone (91�) 733-4404 Joseph R. Fluharty, Sr.
Secretary Donald E. Francisco, Ph.D.
Au> ia .7s�a'. �h J. C. Outlaw
1-1r. James E. Bringle, President 'f E�
James E. Bringle, Inc..
Rt. 1, Bost 549—A
Salisbury, N. C. 28144 �� AND At
Qu�%LlTY,
SUBJECT: Temporary Certificate"Number: 1897
Issued on: October 30, 1978
To: Air. Ronald Joe Crotts
Dear Sir:
This is to advise that subject Temporary Certificate, issued to the
operator designated by you to be the Operator in Responsible Charge of your
wastewater treatment facility has an expiration date of October 30, 1979.
This places upon you the responsibility of taking necessary steps to provide
a properly certified operator to operate your -facility in order to remain
in compliance with the provisions of Article 3, Chapter 90A of the General
Statutes of North Carolina.
Please be reminded that it was your responsibility to encourage your
Operator in Responsible Charge to make every effort to become permanently
certified by examination during the Temporary Certification period.. If your
operator has achieved permanent certification, please advise this office
accordingly. If not, please advise of reasons for failing to.comply with
this requirement.
You should be advised that the Certification Commission expects every
facility owner to have their Operator in Responsible Charge properly trained
and certified by examination and hold a certificate grade equal.to that of
the plant classification or higher.
The Certification Commission will be extremely reluctant to renew a
Temporary Certificate, if the above efforts have not been made. In addition,
the Commission will only consider issuance of Temporary Certification when
the supply of permanently certified operators is inadequate within the area
of the facility or in cases of extreme extenuating circumstances. Persons
being issued Temporary Certification must possess the required experience
and education to be eligible to take examination for the grade equivalent
to the plant classification.
In regard to.the above, it is important that you tape the necessary
steps to meet the requirements set forth herein prior to the expiration of
your operator's Temporary Certificate.

- 2 -
Please know that the staff of this office stands ready to assist
you in,this endeavor in anyway possible; therefore, if you have any
questions or if we may be of service to you, please advise us.
Sincerely.yours,.
D. L.'Coburn, Chairman
Certification Commission
Enclosures'
'cc:'. Mooresville Regional Officef/
ALC:vk

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 19, 1976
Mr. E. B. Stafford, Consulting. Engineer
Post Office Box 563
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
Subject: Proposed Extended Aeration System
For..Bringle's.Abattoir
Rowan County
Dear -Mr. Stafford:
I am returning the information which you mailed to me concerning the above
subject project. After a review of the -material, I have recommended to Raleigh.
that the .design.be approved as submitted,'if the two feet of freeboard require-
ment is met.
Mr..Don:Jacobs of our Engineering Section was also concerned that there would
not be .adequate mixing An _.ttie aeration basin. With the information supplied by
the manufacturer there would appear to be more than enough "Helixors" for mixing.,
Concern was expressed as to what method of disposal would. be used for solids build-
up in the basin. Considering the retention time (40"days),.I believe that the
only solids which will be deposited in the basin will be an ash=.vr=the inert
portion of.the biological organisms which will buildup very slowly. Ire the event
that solids do build up unexpectedly, these.solids could be pumped out by the same
method used to pump out septic tanks.
Therefore, I hope that final approval will be forthcoming and Mr. Bringle will
finally have an adequate disposal system.. If you have any ,questions concerning our
review of this project, please call me.
Sincerely,
Ralph' E. Whi tesel 1
Environmental Engineer-

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMIANAGEMENT
June 30, 1976
f-1EMIORANDU E TO: W. E. Long, Jr.
FROM: Ral ph L7. Whi tesa,,L�Z,/
SUBJECT: Final Plans and Specifications for gringle's Abattoir
Attached are the final plans and specifications for waste treatment
facilities to serve 3ringle's Abattoir. A new NPOES Permit has been drafted
for this facility and has been sent to :Bill Mills' office:. It is recomiended
that these final plans he reviewed since no problems can be foreseen concerning
issuance of a permit for these facilities.
Attachment
REW:ss

0%IQSI.CN OF EHVIROWITAL MANAGEMENT
w Novenber 3, 1976
Mr.
Jundsmingle. inc.
,Routa 1, 3ox 540-A
Salisbury, North Carolina 20144
Subject: .. Reconnaissanca Inspection
brib6le's Custom Rutchoring Plant
Pernit 0. U3040",
Dwr it. WrQla:
Wclasqq Qvw VA 1 copy of too inspostio . A Raport.for the
subjo& facilky . cnn.'UQ&".i 1971 �q npn q, owse1i o7 ys Division.
70 701�:iny Or: �70-
;Acwln� r1ant is w 1D cc 111o11'_n NRA the
scWnja s, _,p%.­10 ,, jojq6�,
K'qcniorAw r2 YK T00-,
10) TAck is CUP!" "Iq or c2r&
thn 004 Carolina Adninistrative
Cadej Ach aplar In, Section .0232, "Cartifiad Operators QaquirodZ:
It Is necessary that a writlan rospons, W submitted to this Office by December
13. 1975, explAining the ruasuns for sonw?lUnca-in kjinning of construction and
other deficiencies found during the RECOWWWW Inswiction. Also, a requast for
an extendion in tha construction schadulo set forth in Permit %. NC 0030465 should
be submitted •to -this Office.
It should be noted that the date for obtaiiing operational Inval . at this Wility,
July 1, 1977 cannot be extended.

P.'r. James E. Bringle
Page; iw®
Nov@wber 8, 1976
If I can be of further assistance in. this or,any other �,iitters, plc-ase a.evise.
:Sincerely,
( R)GII tl L S1G3.NED B--
or,al " rngim2er
cc: f"r. P ul J. `fir:ii -la
Rowan co lm c`1 Bea l ti
REW:sju

t',. C. C!,TVICjq� S�CTTO!-j
OF ENV 11 Dr,N' f1 I-V, ".A.GEMi-ENT - WATER Q; L 1TY Al 2.%,j jlf—ili. I�n:%
P E PORT OF RLECO;',N"A". j S SANCE I NIS PECT T 0'-, OF
WA—ST EWA71 ER TP,-r_ATI,',Ef--iT PLANT
DATE OF INSPEECTIO:N'
DATE OF REPORT
A. GENERAL INFORMATION . I
I. PLANT (a) NAME
(b) OWNER
(C) LOCATION &
COU?
ftJTY
Lj
A. ell 1,2/1
-'s
'z
TYPE OF PLANT 3. PER"IT NUMBER 4. AVERAGE DESIGr! FLOW
do 6 T
PURPOSE
OF INSPECTION
-
�,�,�Compliance withe NPDLE'S Permit Ej Compliance wi t h Administrative Order
Compliance with Court Order
Compliance with State Perimit
Other
B. CO "PLIANCE STATUS
.'NPH7S- PE-R',,IIT
(a)
-PER11IT NO.
(b) PERMIT EFFECTIVE
DATE
(c) EXPIRATION DATE
N6
0
SCHEDULE.
,CTION TO 317 ACCOMIPLISHED DATE TO BE ACCOMPLISHED COMPLIANCE DATE COMPLIANCE ACHEII
ZAN y LS

"1.. ,�
� •'! ,� f`a•�� f
i/•L �/C/ C ?�°
,'�'�.0 Gi `•� �L liv
l�''l' , �r?.G� �'
, r�
f_...icl'J1�"
i
D= \l i i t i— r(i=L'nroY 1' -Fre)Tl
l=i Permit Plo.o
IVIA
(a) Peri i EfiecLive Date
q(c) LXpiralion DaL-e
T
PAR ,'�f? S�tr" �DfJLE.
I
A TI C11S T C SE ACCOMPLISHED
D,,ATC .TO BEE ACCOMPLISHED
C0,1PLIANCE
...
DATE MMPL. I:hi;GE. ACIiEI
r CI J:=''I T :
� _1
3. S7- F-NOI;ITOR tIG
Hlas monitoring program been approved by State? E] Yes E] No
H.as latestrequired annual report been filed? �j- Yes r—I f-Io
Is Sel i -r:oni toring and reporting being accomplished in compliance with approval
program? E] Yes h NO
( b ) Cerei f i cati on Q! YES �l III
Grade
ar

PECC NEiNiDAIFI ONS :
/fdJr17��C-77
l�
� �G� - /1�C� o 0
3 d �(G 5' �P •�� v�,l�� 11��r�
INSPECTION PERFORMED
BY:
/
.���ru�
SIGNATURE:
/'s
cal
��
J

0ecenber 20, 1976
Ear. James E. Bringle, President
James Bringle, Inc.
Route 1, Box 549-A
Salisbury, North Carolina 23144
SUBJECT: Establishment of a self
monitoring program for
Janes Bringla, Inc.
Rowlan County
Dear Mr. Bri ngl e:
On September 209 1976 WDES Penlit Number NCO030465 was issued to
Janes Bringle, Inc. This permit requires Submission of monitoring reports
based on data obtained from your self monitoring program. In order that a
replete monitoring proctram for your facility may be considered, an Initial
Annual Survey Report and a Monitoring Proposal are required. Enclosed you
will find three copies each of the above mentioned forms. Please complete
these farms in duplicate and return to this office for processing.
In the interim, please report your data on the enclosed monthly Monitoring
report farms. The identification numbers for your sampling locations will lie:
0pstream
NCO030465101
Influent
IICO030465102
Effluent
NCO030465103
Downstream
NCO030465104
If you should require any assistance in the caMpletion of the enclosed
fares, Please contact fir. Fill Lynch of the South Piedrrront Field Office;
telephone [phone],
Sincerely yours
Original Si.-, cl' by
ROBBRT 'A. CARTER
Robert A. Carter, Head
Water Quality Operations Branch
cc: Data Management
South Piedmont Field Office
Enclosure

DIVT!!Oq OF 7INT7117ENTAL VVIREWT
Tohru,i,ry' 3 978
Mr. James bringle, President
Oamas hrinply, Inc.
Route 1, Box 549-A
Salisbury, North Carolina 23144
SubjecO Umplience Evaluation Ahalysis
NPOKS Per= Mo. PC 0030465
Pringle' s Custom Butchering Plant
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Brinqle:
Unclosed please find a cop7 n? t4n Report of a Compliance Evaluation Analysis
conducted on Fqbrunry 2,7, 1-7,YY V? Mr. Keith Overcash of this yivisi6h.
The Report spoula be self-explanatory and thn followinq obsorvations and/or
recoynendaticns were We -
According to
Wnso0ptions
rindann Vy pursonnn!
of this UfVice. a
non -discharge
wanswavir
awynns
stap na; boon
constructod at tha
subject plant
jo 1 jou
& no
rynwa dnEcvVK in
W&S Pyiid V A0 0939465.
KoNovcr, tno per:�21��
12S 20
applAnd for A0 =100 W prapar
;.-!crii1t for tho
nonkizckarnc
system.
.T... pail 9chngo parmit applicatirn Ycn7 with QW110 plans and Sac-
ifl-chibb Jr' the vasknaWr Qinatz5t jaqllity Q10 Na: boon cin-
structod must 52 sunVIWK to this Wina no 7nAr than Orch 31, IDYS,
so that a non-dischargc pGrEil Lon be issual for 02 facility. it
should be noted that the operation of the wastewater treatment facility
without obtaining the proper perriit is a violotion of North Carolina
General Statutes. Such a violation b2y be s0ject to a civil penalty
of up to $5,000.00 per d4y.
if you havo apy quasmons, ploaso c3nact !&. overcash or me at the heiz,
address or telephone number.
SincerelyJJ ��1�'� Du�L.c"-G-
-
Q Gleason
Regional Engineer
Enclosure
6c: Kr. Paul J. Trzinn5 K.P.A.
Rowan County Health Department
BKD:sju

X,
. COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION REPORT
FRCILITY
ks
� yI % 1
Z. ffi.12 - no ru.J.
r C er) 4 / 2.'•Z4F�2TC`) Cr n
.3. Comm
CvlISDuY
/V
Rengonaible 4It cial
7. Title -
8 Telephonne Ico.
• u eS Y)i,c l
��/�ier .
oil) fie? - b
9. Facility Rep•,ee5cnta,twe
10. Title
II- Telephone Nl
12. 24PDms PerzaLt.:lo..
13. Perccit Ex--ir blom, Cate
14. Basin Code
5
0 2=no 3yS.A.
1. FtegalW Actiots
2. Schedules Dame
3,6 an ScYredulq
C. P?.'=lTzr ZlVM=�ss�=N
t i 1. Records. and i is
P16V unw-Ith4_)3ae:1 Y2js;;�=a€ol
t� 2®.. Bige�a u3 Zxxt . '.
o r L s Pa e< ts4'es V� a1� Other
i '$ 3• Sz$p�ei.^� Proceac •.. ..
$� i. Altxexmats- Por.-or
• D. pRce= i c RAM
.30 Day. A'.
B :mHES F��Mii --
-Dadly 12-
r` i• `Persia-Con•33:aa-s.---- ev .- Sll`"a:at-)ziegData F
ParaaatF2 %$a �; rge
Vai..ly 7-Da;Ass r . 30- Day Average. Ea� il]r
Cene.. lbs/des_
. tones° �s/day M ax. Cornc. lbs/day Conc. lt�s,9day
a. Sow
3cl1. LQ ,?•.�
_
-
-
..
�
b. 7'ss
f �• ,7S
S>w
31
�
c ci
C. pH
2. Z5
lQ
3- 3
dA
Actor
"2 Pc is tssf� t Acti�� /�oSSw
Per xuf�== m
Other � Fcrllc�•s� %�"��ioa .
—
G. s+e� CCCN d✓ �r c /: u " ,� 9er.Scy�ne% 0 is
-
r
L Y 'r, (r��hY4•Q v 2
1j!� � / d.L
el 2 C j(rC//' 0_S G?�.�_y�iay.i/ru�C�
pp q e
l'i I /C i l f !'l G�/)
A�A
/ L / I
c_t, /'L-' n.l / C/J o S L�tLi S 7 P_s7� .
/
D W2tl fr ih ., i-L,
Ll
/
ri- "i ".l Qh�• •"/kf a.J P�/'/Cc.->-/ Qvf.
!24 Cj —c,,„ e t. Lot
/ . C : Crime-r � e • .
INSPECrM BY: V
AC.- Ncy
DATE
DIVISIONS
US? -Y
/VC i �C�
z �— Z 7' %�
comsz�cz- s, ATus -
P'VIFNrsD BY: I c aL-
(r l(
z- Z 7 0
d D Zw-�pliance
.
7
CHECXED BY: �y�
$ 1 Ncncpopliancs -
APPPOvzD BY:[co
Tg
EPA Form T-51 19.76)
PAGE I OF 12

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEIME141'
June 15, 1977
Mr. James E. Brindle
James Brindle, Inc.
Route 1, Box 549-A
Salisbury, ;forth Carolina 23144
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
James Brindle, Inc.
1NPDES Permit Ho. NC O030405
Rogan County, North Carolina
Dcar tor. Brindle:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection
conducted by members of Che staff of this Office.
The Report should be self-explanatory. The investigation revealed that
the proposed wastewater treatment facility is not in compliance with the
construction schedule or the *nitoring requirements set forth in the subject
NPDES Permit. You should Uynediately construct the proposed wastewater
treatment facility and submit to this Office in writting by June 27, 1977
the reasons for the non-compliance. It should be noted that if this facility
is still discharging or if the discharge is not in compliance with the
final effluent limitations by Ju,ly 1, 1977, you will be subject to enforce-
ment action which could result in civil fines of up to $5,O00 per day per
violation. Members of the staff of this Office will be making investigations
and taking samples during the first part of July to determine if the wastewater
treatment facility is in compliance. If the facility is found in non-compliance,
enforcement action will be recoitiTiended.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
2J
D. 11ex GI eason
Regional Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Rowan County health Department
Mr. Paul J. Traina, EPA
A' LDC: ss

COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION REPORT
DATE
TZK9 !VVP=
A: F A"T
-1.
2.'ZOCATICN
3. COUNTY
4. KNICIPALITY
5". STATE19
6.' Responsible Officia
P
7 . Title
0
8. Telephone No.
9. Facility Representative
10. Title
11- Telephone No.
12. MDES Permit No
j 1
1BasinPermit Expiration Date
14. Basin Code
B. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
• tenor 3-N.A-
1. Required Action
2. Schedule Date
.3. on schedule
4. Remarks
C. FACILITY EVALUATION
I=SitisfactorY 3='Z.A.
2--Unsatisfactory
1. Records and Reports
2. Operations and.'
Maintenance
3. Sampling Procedures
4. Flow Measurements S. Unauthbrized Disc-arg(
( ) 6. Laboratory Procedures 9. Other
( ) 6. Sludge bisposal, Practices -
( ) 7. Alternate Ppwer
D. nomc=cm RATZ
By NW DES Permit
30 Day Average Current
Daily Pax..
E. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Parameter
I 'Permit Condit;_on s -_
2. Self-Monitorinj Data
7-Day Average
30-ray Average
Daily
7-Da11 Average'
30-Day Average
D, Ily
",Ly
Conc.
lbs/dav
Conc.
lbs/dlaY
Max.
Conc.
lbs/day
Conc.
lbs/day
a. BOD
b. SS
C. PH
F. 1000MIMENDATIONS
NoActionModi-fl.
Further information
Drove OQi Follow-up Letter
Per ­_Lit __T;;;Fnforcement Action
other Follow-up Inspection
G_ MWJ111S /I ,(2
INSPF ED BY
CT-
E7
DA E
ENFORCEMENT DIVISIONS
USE ONLY
COYPLULN-CE STATUS
F_'-�,=-,rrin BY:
Compliance
WoncRmpliance,
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
EPA Form T-51 (9-76)
PAGE I OF 12

1W­
DIVISION OIL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 21197E
IjAIATER- AND. AID
,
Mr. James-E. Bringle, President
James Bringle, Inc:
Route 1, Box 5494
Salisbury, North Carolina 28141E
SUBJECT: James Bringle, Inc.
Cattle Butchering and Processing Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Bringle:
Prior .to
the issuance of a permit the following items must be resolved:
1.
No storm water may be allowed to enter the system.through
the cattle holding pens, concrete pad or other source or
over the pond dikes. The ponds should be protected from
the 100-year flood. Please confirm that erosion protection
has been considered. Iudicate'the pond liners or compaction
specifications. We'recommend an impermeable liner for the
aerated lagoon.
2.
Any entrance of salt into the system must be eliminated.
3.
Cleaning hoses for the cattle pen and other areas.,requiring
hand cleaning.must.be equipped with automatic shut -offs. Back-
flow.preventers should be installed where necessary.
4.
We.strongly recommend the use of a settling basin immediately
following the cattle.pen.
5.
A.baffle for the 4-inch GIP discharge line from the aerated
lagoon should be installed.
6.
Please advise us of the ultimate means of disposal of solid wastes.
7.
Dual spray irrigation pumps are needed each with pressure gauges
on the suction and discharge lines., Timers should also be installed.
8.
All.spray lines must be completely drainable, flushable, and otherwise
protected from freezing.' Shutoff valves in the spray lines should be
installed to allow isolation of applications.
9.
Indicate the amount of storage capacity that is provided.
10.
Please advise us of the maximum proposed application rate .
Coutlds
,. ..

i
Ls:
Mr. James E. Bringle, President
James Bringle, Inc.
Route 1, Box 5494
Salisbury, North Carolina. 28144
Dear Mr. Bringle:
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGMIENT
May 19, 1978
SUBJECT: James Bringle, Inc.
Cattle Butchering and Processing Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
Rowan County
This is in regards to our letter dated April 21, 1978, concerning the
subject project. Please be advised that in accordance with North Carolina
General Statutes (15 NCAC 2 H .0208-(b) (4) we must return the subject appli=
cation and supporting documents as incomplete if the items in the above letter.
are not resolved and resubmitted to this office prior to May 31, 1978.
If the subject application and supporting.documents are returned as incomplete
for reason of :ion -compliance with the above time period, the applicant may resubmitt
the project documents with the requested revisions to the Director of the Division
of Environmental Management for review action.
If you have any further questions.concerning this project, please contact
Mr. Steve Rogers, Permits and Engineering Branch.
Sincerely,
W . ,% . 14ik,,,,,,.,,,,
W. S . Hoffman, Head
Permits and Engineering Branch
Water Quality Section
cc: Mr. Rex Gleason i'
Mr. Steve Rogers
SR/mcb

n
ram'
Mr. .dames E. BrInGle, President
Jaques Eringle, Inc.
Route 1, Box 549-A
Salisbury,,North Carolina 28144
SUBJECT: Psrmit No. NCO030465
Authorization to Construct
Jamas Uringle, Inc.
Bringls*s Abattoir
Aswan County
Dear sir. Bringle:
September 28, 1976
The final plans and specifications For the above mentioned subject have been
reviewed and have been found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted
for the construction of 9,000 gpd wastewater facilities consisting of a grease trap,
a 144,000 gallon aerated lagoon and clarification basin With sludge return, and
chlorination facilities.
This is a Class I Wastewater Treatment Plant which requires the operator in
responsible charge to hold a valid Grade I Certificate.
This Authorization to Construct stall be subject to revocation unless the
wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions
and limitations specified in Permit No. INC0030465.
Also, enclosed in a copy of WPC Form #50 "Cost of Wastewater Treatment Works."
This form is to be completed and returned to this office within thirty (30) .Says
after the project is completed.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you.
Sincerer
Original SignsVOY
W, E. KNIGHT'
W. E. XnIght
Director
Enclosures
cc: Rogan County Health Department
Mr. E. B. Stafford, P.E.
Mr. D. Rex Gleason ✓
Mr. W. E. Long, Jr.
Planning and Management Section

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 19, 1976
MEMORANDUM TO: W. E. Long, Jr.
FROM: D. Rex Gleason DIP
SUBJECT: Bringle's Abattoir,, Salisbury
Rowan County
This Office has contacted Mr. E. B. Stafford, consulting engineer, concerning
comments made by the Engineering Section on the proposed extended aeration system
to serve Bringle's Abattoir. Mr. Don Jacobs indicated the following items needed
to be clarified.before issuance of a permit for this sytem:
(1) A minimum freeboard of 2 feet must be maintained.
(2) What provisions will be made for removal of solids from the lagoon.
(3) Considering the geometry of the lagoon and the proposed treatment
process, it'appears that the mixing:requirements should be the
governing factor in computing the amount of air required in the,
aeration area.
Mr. Stafford has explained that two feet of freeboard can be maintained by
minor construction modifications. Concerning the second comment listed above,
Mr. Stafford explained that the rate of sludge production should not be so great
as to cause a;sludge removal problem. Since the lagoon has a volume of approxim-
ately 20 days retention time at a design flow of 9,000 gallons per day. However,
the present and the foreseeable future flow is 4,500 gallons per day. Therefore,
it is the writer's belief that most solids will be oxidized in the aeration basin.
If solids do build up, Mr. Stafford has explained that they could be pumped out on
demand since the lagoon has a concrete bottom (by portable pump). -It is not rec-
ommended that permanent sludge handling equipment be required. Mr. Bringle does
own property suitable for the wasting of sludge from the lagoon.
The final comment concerning the system is related to mtxing requirements in
the lagoon. Attached is a proposal by the manufacturer of the "Helixors" which.
specifies five "Helixors" as suitable for the mixing of the 180,000 gallon. lagoon.
The dimensions of the lagoon have also been recommended by the manufacturer (see
attachment).
Mr. Stafford.has changed the design slightly by doubling the expected flow and
BOD and providing three additional Helixors to provide for this additional 02 demand.

1
V
W. E. Long, Jr.
Page Two
August 19, 1976
Since only five "Helixors" were recommended by the manufacturer for mixing of the
basin, eight should be more than adequate.
Copies of the engineering proposal submitted by the manufacturer are attached
for your information. Also, there is -a copy of the manufacturers brochure which
shows a cross-section of the "Helixor" and explains how 0 transfer and mixing are
accomplished. Also attached is the engineering proposal_iubmitted by fir. E. B.
Stafford.
It should also be noted that five smaller "Helixors" have been provided for
sludge return from the clarification basin as per the manufacturer's recommendations.
These additional. "Helixors" would also tend to provide mixing., --and_ 02 transfer -above
calculated requirements.
With the review of the material provided, it is the writer's recommendations
that the proposed system be approved as submitted, provided two feet'of freeboard
is maintained in the basin. The -local representative for the "equipment (Helixor)
is:
Robert L. Carlson, Inc.
Post Office Box 11031
Charlotte, North Carolina 28209
Telephone: [phone] or
332-6066
Attachment..'
REW.:sjue5i