HomeMy WebLinkAbout20030247 Ver 1_Mitigation Report_201104080�-N�
CROSS CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
MONITORING REPORT (YEAR 5 OF 5)
Cumberland County, North Carolina
EEP Project No. 105
Prepared for:
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Status of Plan: Final
Submission Date: November 2010
Monitoring Firm:
Stantec
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27606
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................ ..............................1
2.0 Methodology ....................................................................................................... ..............................2
2.1 Vegetation Assessment ................................................................................ ..............................2
2.2 Stream Assessment ...................................................................................... ..............................2
2.3 Wetland Assessment .................................................................................... ..............................3
3.0 References ........................................................................................................... ..............................4
Project Condition and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix A. General Figures and Plan Views 5
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map 7
Figure 2 — Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) 9
Appendix B. General Project Tables
Table 1 — Project Restoration Components 11
Table 2 — Project Activity and Reporting History 11
Table 3 — Project Contacts Table 12
Table 4 — Project Background Table 13
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 — Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Table 15
Photos — Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 16
Table 6 — Vegetation Metadata Table (CVS) 24
Table 7 — Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 25
Photos — Vegetation Problem Area Photos (electronic submission only)
Table — Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Tale (electronic submission only)
Appendix D. Stream Assessment Data
Photos — Stream Station Photos 27
Table 8 — Visual Morphological Stability Assessment 30
Table 9 — Verification of Bankfull Events 31
Figures — Cross - sections with Annual Overlays 33
Figures — Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays 37
Table — Baseline Stream Data Summary Table (electronic submission only)
Table — Morphology and Hydraulic Summary — Cross - section (electronic submission only)
Table — Morphology and Hydraulic Summary — Reach (electronic submission only)
Photos — Stream Problem Area Photos (electronic submission only)
Table — Stream Problem Areas Inventory Table (electronic submission only)
Appendix E. Wetland Assessment (n/a)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page i
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page i
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
1.0 Executive Summary
Project goals and objectives for the Cross Creek and Little Cross Creek Stream Restoration are to:
• Provide a stable stream channel that neither aggrades nor degrades while maintaining its
dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport its watershed's water and sediment
load.
• Provide the stream with a floodplain at the stream's current elevation.
• Improve aquatic habitat with the use of natural material stabilization structures such as root wads,
rock vanes, woody debris and a riparian buffer.
• Provide wildlife habitat and bank stability through the creation of a riparian zone.
Year 5 vegetation monitoring was completed on September 9 and 15, 2010 at eight monitoring plots that
were originally established by Earth Tech. Level 2 (planted and natural stems) of the Carolina Vegetation
Survey (CVS) — NCEEP protocol (version 4.2) protocol was used. The floodplain adjacent to the right
banks, mainly in the middle of the floodplain, of Little Cross Creek and Cross Creek below the
confluence were bush hogged during MY3. These areas were replanted during MY4. Additional
replanting along the left bank of Little Cross Creek and the right bank of Cross Creek below the
confluence occurred in the spring of 2010. All plots meet year 5 vegetative success criteria of >260
trees /acre. The site also received invasive species control during the summer of 2010. Much of the kudzu
was sprayed and was dead, although in a few areas it appeared to be resprouting. This should not be a
major problem as a follow up treatment is scheduled for the 2011 growing season. The Japanese
knotweed seemed to be eliminated from the area around the stormwater BMPs but is still present near
VP101. A few princess trees were observed to the east of VP 105 but are not shown on the CCPV due to
the small extent.
Mid - channel bar formations were observed in Little Cross Creek, indicating that the stream may not
possess sufficient capacity at this time. Colonization by beavers in this area in more recent years may be a
contributing factor as well. EEP indicated that a wildlife control contractor has been dispatched to remove
the beavers from the site. The sotrmwater plunge pool and wetland pond area continued to remain
unstable and had contributed bank sediments to the channel below. Cross Creek upstream of the
confluence with Little Cross Creek appeared to remain relatively stable with no major changes from last
year.
The stormwater plunge pool area and wetland pond were continuing to experience mass bank wasting,
causing deposition of sediment into the main channel. The energy associated with the flow from the
culvert is too great for the plunge pool as it is currently constructed. As a result of this a scour hole has
developed. The wetland pond located on the right bank near station 21 +60 is continuing to experience
bank erosion. The wetland pond erosion is related to the excess energy associated with the culvert/plunge
pool area described above. EEP is establishing a repair contract for this area. Many of the projects
structures are not functioning as intended and the project has exhibited some minor bank erosion that
manifested earlier in the projects history, but Stantec believes that the restoration is generally stable and
other than the stormwater outfall area designated for repair, the stability of the project has generally
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 1
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
improved each monitoring year. The channel has good connection to its floodplain and has good
vegetation established.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment, and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
2.0 Methodology
2.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
Vegetative sample plots were quantitatively monitored during the first growing season. Eight IOOmz plots
were established throughout the project. In each plot, all four plot corners were permanently located with
conduit. Species composition, density, and survival were monitored during Year 0 and Year 1. In addition
to these parameters height, diameter, and vigor were monitored in Years 2 -5 using the Carolina
Vegetation Survey (CVS) methodology Version 2.2.5. Level 2 (planted and natural stems) methodology
was utilized.
As per the mitigation plan, the vegetative success criteria are based on the US Army Corps of Engineers
Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE, 2003). The final vegetative. success criteria will be the survival of
260 5 -year old planted stems per acre at the end of the year 5 monitoring period. An interim measure of
vegetation planting success will be the survival of at least 288 4 -year old planted trees per acre at the end
of Year 4 of the monitoring period.
The Year 5 stem counts for the eight vegetative monitoring plots are included in Table 7 in Appendix C.
Photos of the vegetative monitoring plots are also included in Appendix C.
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT
A longitudinal profile survey of the entire length of the project was completed in September 2010.
Additional data collected included riffle length, riffle slope, pool length and pool spacing. During the
longitudinal survey, additional pattern data was collected including channel beltwidth, radius of
curvature, meander wavelength and meander width ratio. Stability was also visually assessed. A total of
six permanent cross - sections were characterized. Data collected included, at a minimum, cross - sectional
area, bankfull width, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, floodprone width, width to depth ratio,
and entrenchment ratio. Stream type was determined in riffle cross - sections only. Success will be
measured based on whether the channel features stay within the natural variability of the dimensionless
ratios of the reference reaches.
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 2
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
2.3 WETLAND ASSESSMENT
No wetland restoration occurred during the Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project.
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 3
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
3.0 References
Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO.
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.2 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm)
NCEEP. 2009. Revised Table of Contents for 2009 Monitoring Report Submissions. North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC.
Version 1.2.1 June 1, 2009.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
USACE, EPA, NCWRC, NCDWQ. 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
Weakley, Alan S. 2010. Flora of the Southern and Mid - Atlantic States. University of North Carolina
Herbarium. Chapel Hill, NC. Working draft of March 8, 2010.
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 4
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Project Condition and Monitoring Data Appendices
APPENDIX A. GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 5
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
This page blank intentionally left blank.
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 6
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Ba
CU: 03030004
k Stu
o i
s
/'\/ Roads
IN/ Railroads
"'\-o Hydrography
City of Fayetteville
Cross Creek
35.066207N, 78.892009W
Directions: From Raleigh, take 1-40 East
to 1 -95 South. Take 1 -95 South to NC 24
(Exit 52). Take NC 24 West to Bragg Blvd.
Turn right on Bragg Blvd and then right on
Blue St. Project is located on Blue St.
M
Figure 1- Vicinity Map
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project # 105
Cumberland County, NC
Monitoring Year 5
1,000 2,000 Feet
. Stant4t
�lv I N. � I yhYV - M -11A NV Id N
31Y0 Mz 3O $NOGIA3H
(n
O N m 0 N 0 (D 0� N r
w
M
M r O O M M M 00 0 0 1t 0
M
0
t` 0 r r - 00 It It 0 0 0 0
Q
N
0 O (0 C0 (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
u i'T
AVJ J1S >113210 SSO?J0 0
(n
0
00
UDM00000000O V)
0_
M M M M M M M M M M M
011-11
`1
8
J
O
(�
[f
M M M M N M N M N M
It
N
0N _ M N LO
O
Z
z
r O0 co M w N 0
00 �
d
_ N _ N 0) N N
Z
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 00 0) O
oo co ao ao ao ao eo 0o ao ao eo
O
�
oo Oo ao ao au Oo ao Oo 0o r ao 00
0
N
M
U
J
V
w
N
N
(f)
(n
(0
U)
(0
O
C C C C C C C C C C C C
(n
0
(D
.a 'a a s 'a a 'a a 'a a 'a a
�
C
�- N N Cl) M qT V N LO (D (D
U
o
x x x x x x x x x x x x
M31A NVId NOLI0N00 1NIbJ8n0
l� S)IW - AOd3�! ONI8011NOW
SOl 83ev4nN 103P08d d33
L
J \) N011V MS321 Wd38iS )43380 SSO2JO
ON
q
O
J�
z y
Z y
W �
E �
!7 U
a
W
M
3M
a
°o 'n
a
sa
yF
f X y
\ �f
\1 N
z Yt Q
= X N
N
W
FW..�'
.l
S N�1�NIHSdM
i
W
Q
W
K m
y +
X m
Q
y PT
X
y
W
R'
y
y
u o
w
~ ulJ
y 'Ta°o
N
Q \N
- '�''.I
AV80MJd 1N3W30NVHN3
W31SJ.S003 VN130 JV3 H12]ON , o
M
N
M
r
M
0
r
N
N
u i'T
AVJ J1S >113210 SSO?J0 0
(n
r
00
`
011-11
00
O
M
[f
t`
It
N
t`
00
z
m
N
M
0
r
(D
OD
N
0
N
M
00
0
V
IT
N
N
LU
(n
(0
0
(D
(0
O
0
(0
O
0
(D
0
(D
0
O
r
(D
t-
(0
qT
(D
V
(0
O
(0
(0
(D
O
(0
O
(D
Q
0060c,5006000
0
0
0
0
0
Z
0
0
Cl)
(0
0
0
M
0
66
0
u i
6
(n
Ln
0
J
M
M
M
M
M
Cl)
Cl)
M
M
M
M
Cl)
M
O
00
0)
0)
M
01
M
0)
r
r
Cl)
Cl)
(f')
0
M
'T
't
0)
O'T
O
00
O-
0)
IT
0
O
r
M
M
N
0
0
O
-
O
w-
M
0
r
0
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
N
N
-
v
-
N
M
N
N
N
U
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
O)
O
0)
O
0
0)
O
W
00
00
00
CC)
00
00
00
00
OD.
OD
00
M
CO
0
00
0
Z
m
co
co
r
00
00
00
00
0
00
w
00
r`
w
OD
00
a
o
OJ
J
Q,
7
N
N
7
N
N
N
N
N
N
�.�
NNC�c)vv�n(n(o(or�rooao
_
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>a>>
>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>
q
O
J�
z y
Z y
W �
E �
!7 U
a
W
M
3M
a
°o 'n
a
sa
yF
f X y
\ �f
\1 N
z Yt Q
= X N
N
W
FW..�'
.l
S N�1�NIHSdM
i
W
Q
W
K m
y +
X m
Q
y PT
X
y
W
R'
y
y
u o
w
~ ulJ
y 'Ta°o
N
Q \N
- '�''.I
AV80MJd 1N3W30NVHN3
W31SJ.S003 VN130 JV3 H12]ON , o
o W
W
U
N
VNI108VO HAON ')dNf100 ONV1838nno �
IiIS NOIJ_d?JO1S3?1
AVJ J1S >113210 SSO?J0 0
0 o
o `
`
U
Q
Li
z
Qj
C5
Lo
Ln
O
_ L
U
s -Y
u
0
Q
LJ
ry
0 U Q
p �I LLJ -Y
O F- LLJ I- 0
F- Z
U -
= OV) Q I
0 0- po
J I
3 'D Q �^ u
J O
Z Q p Z L7 J 0�f
3
Q = Q' Z Lil Q L'-I
m F- (__) Q > o
0
(U
® QC
2 ^w,
We
cL
LTT
J
Iti
Z �
W aj Ca
L T W
W d W
Li a
Z ~a
W Z Z
J p = Q W
Z I LJ W
Z Q I� Q � � W
Q! U p LL Ld Q LJ Q
Li
Li F-
p i p Q'
J QW Q r Q Z U a_
PQ 3 z F- 0! F- M
p �p Q Q H U Z
CD �J J2: p Y O N
F- W p Z F Q F-
0 LL- Q Y
LJ o w ..
® ®, j '3 L
APPENDIX B. GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Project Restoration Components
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
2002
Oct 2002
Final Design - 90%
NA
2004
Construction
2004
Jan 2005
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
en
_
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
2004
Reach ID
" �,
Jan 2005
°
4°„ "
U W.
Stationing
Comment
Nov 2006
Dec 2006
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 2007
Dec 2007
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 2008
Instream structures and vegetated buffers. The
Cross Creek
1295
R
P2
1376.0
1188.0
11 +4.00 to 25 +16.58
difference between footage and creditable
Nov 2009
Supplementary Planting
NA
March 2010
Invasive Species Control
NA
Summer 2010
footage is due to three areas of single -sided
Se t 2010
Nov 2010
easement, totaling 188 linear feet of the stream.
Little Cross Creek
705
R
P2
1 714.0
1 714.0
10 +00 to 17 +13.687
Instream structures and vegetated buffers.
Mitigation Unit Summations
Riparian
Nonriparian
Buffer
Stream (if)
Comment
Wetland ac
1
Wetland ac
ac
2090.0
0.0
0.0
1 0.0
R = Restoration
P2 = Priority 2
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
2002
Oct 2002
Final Design - 90%
NA
2004
Construction
2004
Jan 2005
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
2004
2004
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
2004
2004
Containerized and B &B plantings
Jan 2005
Jan 2005
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline
A r 2006
Ju12006
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 2006
Dec 2006
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 2007
Dec 2007
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 2008
Nov 2008
Supplementary Planting (Specimen Trees
NA
Summer 2009
Invasive Species Control
NA
Summer 2009
Year 4 Monitoring
Sept 2009
Nov 2009
Supplementary Planting
NA
March 2010
Invasive Species Control
NA
Summer 2010
Year 5 Monitoring
Se t 2010
Nov 2010
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 11
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Table 3. Contacts
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Designer
Earth Tech
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Primary project design POC
Bill Jenkins, PE 919 854 -6200
Construction Contractor
Backwater Environmental
2312 New Bern Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27610
Construction contractor POC
Wes Newell (919)231-9227
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics, Inc.
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Planting Contractor POC
Mary-Margaret McKinney (252)482-8491
Seeding Contractor
Backwater Environmental
2312 New Bern Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27610
Seeding Contractor POC
Wes Newell (919)231-9227
Seed Mix Sources
Ernst Conservation Seeds
9006 Mercer Pike
Meadville, PA 16335
Stacy Charles (814)336-2404
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Coastal Plain Conservation Nursery (container plants)
3067 Conners Drive
Edenton, NC 27932
Ellen Colodney (252)482 -5707
Cure Nursery (container plants)
880 Buteo Road
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Jennifer Cure (919)542 -6186
Taylor's Nursery
3705 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27610
Richard Taylor (919)231 -6161
International Paper
55594 Hwy38 S
Blenheim, SC 29516
Gary Nelson 1- 800 - 222 -1290
Monitoring Performers (Year 0 -1)
Earth Tech
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson (919)854-6210
Monitoring Performers (Year 2 -4)
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road, Ste 300
Raleigh, NC 27606
Stream Monitoring POC
Nate Jean (919)851 -6866
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman (919)851 -6866
Wetland Monitoring POC
NA
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 12
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Table 4. Project Background Table
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Project County
Cumberland
Unit Code
03030004100050
-Hydrologic
Area
-Drainage
Cross Creek
10.5/25.5 sq mi
impervious cover estimate %)
71%
-Drainage
Stream Order
Cross Creek/Little Cross Creek
2nd/Ist
Ph sio ra hic Region
Sandhills /Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Atlantic Southern Loam Plains
Ros en Classification of As -built
C
Cowardin Classification
Riverine
Dominant soil types
Chewacla loam
Rion fine sandy loam
Reference site ID
Country Club Branch and Little Rockfish Creek
USGS HUC for Project
USGS HUC for Reference
03030004
03030004
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project
03 -06 -15
Subbasin for Reference
03 -07 -01
_NCDWQ
Classification for Project
Cross Creek (C), Little Cross Creek C
_NCDWQ
NCDWQ Classification for Reference
UT Cross Creek (Country Club Branch, C), Little Rockfish
Creek C
portion of any project segment 303d listed?
Yes
-Any
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
303d listed segment?
Yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Im aried Biological Activity, fecal coliform
of project easement fenced
0%
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105)
Stantee — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final
Page 13
November 2010
This page intentionally left blank.
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 14
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 - Vegetation Plot Mitigation
Success Summary
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP
Project Number 105
Vegetation
Vegetation
Density Met
Tract
Mean
Plot ID
(260
stems /acre )
VP101
Y (607
100%(536
stems /acre)
VP102
Y 1012)
VP 103
Y 486
VP104
Y (486 )
VP105
Y (688)
VP106
Y 405
VP 107
Y (283)
VP108
Y (324
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 15
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
A 1
71
4-
i ii r
4
J R
IT
p-
Or i
Photo Station 9 — Vegetation Plot 108 looking northwest (9/15/10)
Photo Station 10 — Vegetation Plot 108 looking west (9/15/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 17
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Photo Station 11 — Vegetation Plot 105 looking northeast (9/15/10)
Photo Station 12 — Vegetation Plot 105 looking north (9/15/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 18
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Photo Station 13 — Vegetation Plot 104 looking north (9/15/10)
Photo Station 14 — Vegetation Plot 104 looking northwest (9/15/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 19
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
A
` - � `� � + , �rw•r Vii: � , 1 s �t
4
• - � �� Syr` �' ::` �,;. . .1J . ,- --
a
Photo Station 19 —Vegetation Plot 101 looking north (9/9/10)
Photo Station 20— Vegetation Plot 101 looking northwest (9/9/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 22
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
Rr. 7fl,447r,
It
-3,
AO
Table 6. Vegetation Metadata
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Report Prepared By
Alex Baldwin
Date Prepared
11/2/2010 14:07:37 PM
database name
Stantec CrossCreek2010 A.mdb
database location
U.\171300316\project \3- CrossCreek \site data \cvs
computer name
BALDW MA
file size
51118080
DESCRIPTION QF W0AWF F = IN IW_ PQCU ENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary
of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year.
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences
and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and S pp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for
each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot ands pp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted
and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing
stems are excluded.
PRO.1 Wr SUGARY
Project Code
105
project Name
Cross Creek
Description
Stream Restoration in Fayetteville
River Basin
Cape Fear
length(ft)
2090
stream -to -edge width (ft)
100
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
8
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 24
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 — Final November 2010
vrniart rnde 0105. Proiect Name: Cross Creek
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
0105-01-0101
08)
1
My2 (2007)
P -LS
P -all
T T
JP-LS
P -all
T
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
red maple
Tree
6
4
Albizia julibrissin
silktree
Shrub Tree
1 25
16
23
Arms serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub Tree
1
14
4
28
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
3
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub Tree
8
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub Tree
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
9
10
101
Callicarpa americana
American beautyberry
Shrub
2
6
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Shrub Tree
2
6
11
Carpinus caroliniana var. ca
Coastal American Hor
Shrub Tree
Celtis
hackberry
2
2
3
Cercis canadensis var. Cana
eastern redbud
Shrub Tree
1
3
3
Cl ethra alnifolia
coastal sweetpepperb
Shrub
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub Tree
Cupressus
cypress
Fothergilla
witchalder
Fothergilla gardenii
dwarf witchalder
Shrub
2
2
2
5
6
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
1
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
Shrub Tree
Ilex decidua var. decidua
Possum -haw
Shrub Tree
1
9
9
Ilex glabra
inkberry
Shrub
1
1
3
4
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Shrub Tree
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
215
223
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
Liriodendron tulipifera var.
Tulip -tree, Yellow Popl
Tree
8
Mimosa
sensitive plant
Vine Shrub
Morello cerifera
wax myrtle
Shrub Tree
1
6
9
10
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
4
8
8
Paulownia tomentosa
Princesstree
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
44
38
Platanus
sycamore
Tree
17
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
11
Platanus occidentalis var. o
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
50
Populus heterophylla
swamp cottonwood
Tree
4
4
5
Pyrus
pear
Tree
Pyrus calleryana
Callery pear
Tree
4
Quercus
oak
Shrub Tree
2
8
8
8
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
3
4
4
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
6
5
5
Quercus shumardii var. shu
Shumard oak
Shrub Tree
2
2
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub Tree
111
4
1 12
19
' S
1
4
564
34
2853
0
0
0
1
15
6
1
5
129
8
0.20
22
652.6
80
1
1
18
10
2
5
592
33
2995
Rhus copallinum var. copal)
flameleaf sumac
Shrub Tree
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub Tree
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
Toxicodendron radicans
eastern poison ivy
Shrub Vine
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
Ulmus americana var. amer
American Elm, White
Tree
2
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
Unknown
lunknown
Viburnum nudum
1possurnhaw
IShrub Tree
1
Stems
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
per ACRE
0
15
1
0.02
0
10
0
607
Appendix D. Stream Assessment Data
Photo Station 1— Cross Section 1 looking downstream (9/16/10)
Photo Station 2 — Cross Section 2 looking downstream (9/16/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 27
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010
Photo Station 3 — Cross Section 3 looking downstream (9/16/10)
Photo Station 4 — Cross Section 4 looking downstream (9/16/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 28
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010
Photo Station 5 — Cross Section 5 looking downstream (9/16/10)
Photo Station 6 — Cross Section 6 looking downstream (9/16/10)
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 29
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010
Table 8A - Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Cross Creek/1188 feet
(# Stable)
Total
Total
Feature
Metric (per As -built and reference
Number
Number
Number/Feet
%Perform
Perform.
Feature Category
in Stable
baselines)
Performing
per As-
in Unstable
Mean or
Condition
as Intended
built
State
Total
A. Riffles
1. Present?
6
8
75%
2. Armor stable (eg no
N/A
N/A
displacement ?)
3. Facet grade appears stable?
6
8
75%
4. Minimal evidence of
N/A
N/A
embedding/fining?
5. Length a ro iate?
7
8
88%
79%
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to severe
B. Pools
aggrad. or migrat. ?)
6
8
75%
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D:Mean
Bkf> 1.6 ?)
6
8
75%
3. Length appropriate?
5
8
63%
71%
1. Upstream of meander bend
C. Thalweg
(run/inflection) centering?
7
8
88%
2. Downstream of meander
tide /inflection centering?
7
8
88%
88%
1. Outer bend in state of
D. Meanders
limited/controlled erosion?
6
8
75%
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant
1
2
point bar formation?
50%
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
8
8
100%
4. Sufficient floodplain access and
relief?
7
8
88%
78%
1. General channel bed aggradation
E. Bed General
areas (bar formation)
1400
250
82%
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of
increasing down- cutting or head-
cutting?
1
1400
200
86%
68%
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or
F. Bank
slumping bank?
2800
275
90%
90%
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
7
11
64%
2. Height appropriate?
8
11
73%
3. Angle and geometry appear
appropriate?
6
11
55%
4. Free of piping or other structural
failures?
9
11
82%
68%
H. Wads/Boulders
12.
1. Free of scour?
0
4
1
0%
Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
0%
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 30
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010
Table 8B - Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 105
Little Cross Creek / 714 feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As -built and reference
baselines)
(# Stable)
Number
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number
per As-
built
Total
Number/Feet
in Unstable
State
% Perform
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perform.
Mean or
Total
A. Riffles
1. Present?
4
4
100%
2. Armor stable (eg no
displacement ?)
N/A
N/A
3. Facet grade appears stable?
4
4
100%
N/A
N/A
4. Minimal evidence of
embedding/fining?
3
4
92%
5. Length a ro iate?
75%
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to severe
B. Pools
aggrad. or migrat2)
4
4
100%
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D:Mean
Bkf> 1.6 ?)
4
4
100%
3. Length appropriate?
3
4
75%
92%
1. Upstream of meander bend
C. Thalweg
(run/inflection) centering?
4
4
100%
2. Downstream of meander
_
tide /inflection centering?
4
4
100%
100%
1. Outer bend in state of
D. Meanders
limited/controlled erosion?
4
4
100%
2. Of those eroding, # w /concomitant
N/A
N/A
point bar formation?
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
4
4
100%
4. Sufficient floodplain access and
relief?
4
4
100%
100%
1. General channel bed aggradation
E. Bed General
areas (bar formation)
690
330
52%
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of
_
increasing down - cutting or head-
cutting?
690
50
93%
52%
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or
F. Bank
slumping bank?
13801
75
95%
95%
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
4
6
67%
2. Height appropriate?
4
6
67%
3. Angle and geometry appear
appropriate?
4
6
67%
4. Free of piping or other structural
failures?
4
6
67%
67%
H. Wads /Boulders
1. Free of scour?
12.
2
3
67%
1
Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
67%
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 31
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010
Table 9 - Verification of Bankfull Events
Cross Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Pro'ect No. 105
Date of Data
Date of
Collection
Occurrence
Method
Photo
2006
None
N/A
N/A
2007
None
N/A
N/A
9/24/2008
9/6/2008
Visual observation of sediment and
MY3 Report (Appendix B4, Photo 1)
debris in flood lain
11/19/2009
11/2009
Visual Observation
Evidence of Bankfull event.JPG (in digital
data submission
9/1/2010
9/29/2010 1
Weather Data
No photo available
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 32
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010
C
G
O
O
L
3
G
O
b0
G_
cCE
G
U
u
U
O
�D
O
b
O
U
C
O
U
U
y
O
U
cz
G
O
O)
L_
ti
w0
c
v 'd
y C
O �
0
N
T
2 G 2 G G
m.
Q
e
N
Q
+
d o
.Na
a1i
Q
z
�p
O T
N O
L M N
O
q
W 8 W
Ca
,y N
O
ra
N
A
V
L
�
'a Y Y CL
�I
Z J m co t
rn
o)vr�Drn
T NOO Mr co MnM(D to Nao v, cm tD Lq O)OO W OA aMn
y
N
N 4 0 N O M CO CO CO CD CO CD 00 O O O O) CO CO Ih
O O) O 00 CD CO OD aD co co O) O) O) O) O) O) O) W
L
d
L
�
L r
ai 8 W
s
a o0
O
M.
r
^
p N oo r
4
h
L
m
s
Q�
u
L � q
im m
qU
e3��3
C
G
O
O
L
3
G
O
b0
G_
cCE
G
U
u
U
O
�D
O
b
O
U
C
O
U
U
y
O
U
cz
G
O
O)
L_
ti
w0
c
v 'd
y C
O �
qv
1�1
1
M11.1
V
I�1
U U
e0
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
O'
1
al
a'
1
I
Fw I
OI
I
CAI
b I
OI
O'
^N I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DC
O
a
a�
.r
W
�Q
O
O
O
00
cz
0
N
0
O �
� 00
it
V"
O
0
�ii O
N
it
O
N
i O
( laa3) uoi;eAaia
z
T
A 2 °o
m.
Q
d o
0
z
�p
O T
N O
La.
W 8 W
,y N
O
a
'a Y Y CL
Z J m co t
rn
it
T NOO Mr co MnM(D to Nao v, cm tD Lq O)OO W OA aMn
y pT OA OA ONMNco NM� q ,aq OO In rn n O)N�
N 4 0 N O M CO CO CO CD CO CD 00 O O O O) CO CO Ih
O O) O 00 CD CO OD aD co co O) O) O) O) O) O) O) W
L r
ai 8 W
O q
Y N
�
r f0 r CO ONcQNan q0M if q <D co LQ OD)N
C OR O V M r 1L7 N dp aD � (D O Q) O CA M M O LL'1 ll) ^ O M B aD
°<DN V O)N fD 00000 M(O DINMV rO0O0�
)D wOMB
IA lf) In �D co O O
r
C C
d Y !L
im m
qU
J
C T co co co OD f0 ^ N 00 (D O co co N r
y Ccq D?D? N N a1 c4 O n 9 C
p
N OOD oo n co 00 OV �t0
�mmm ma00000co mmmmrn
M A a
�0 'w
ag
coN U) CO tO CO 1[)Mn MNM�
CnOO Nnn<On a0 On ^C)N�
aM N O n CD OM ID LO Ln O NM
v�
Cl) V
N N M V- lD 1D w 00 O)
N
�
D: ^
z
?�
a
w v
Q
T aov a mrcD g 40 1n CDnW v 9 GTNNOOMOCDrfD Co
N N O M a0 a0 CD CD W O OO O y
m W wwwwww mom O)
OGn
S W
rnN )n CO O(q MnmtO r
on rao�n N W cD qCD^ mrnaU� u)
CA LOCO tCDOV vtoC)LOI-
a
^c�iv
V V � �
�NNMMM V l[) LO
0
X Q
U
U v)
LL
o Y
0o
z m
U U
CnN00 W(DO 0MV 0 ^O7 r, 0r NCq
ro '
N O 00 r Otn MMNC4 �qn�
� � O�
L OOaD aD OD OD ao aD auriC
Lp 'w
� °
'�"`V
mnrn N toaDimm�M M�A�AM inn
z
C tO M CO M q 6 r,: 6 rn C6 IR Un
ucn
a+✓d
Ol�vi CD IUD) MN 1D MV NM LO 'Q n
=0 N NNN MM as V LL7 V0
O L
Un
pL. U
qv
1�1
1
M11.1
V
I�1
U U
e0
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
O'
1
al
a'
1
I
Fw I
OI
I
CAI
b I
OI
O'
^N I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DC
O
a
a�
.r
W
�Q
O
O
O
00
cz
0
N
0
O �
� 00
it
V"
O
0
�ii O
N
it
O
N
i O
( laa3) uoi;eAaia
I
I �
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
�1 1
O
^y 1
O '
O
M I
I
O � 1
I
GPM
I
I
1
1� O1_1 I
I
U '
� i I
O I
t I
V
1
I
1
I
I
DC '
O '
a'
a'
I
I
I
1
O�
I
CLI I
•o '
o'
o'
I
I
I
I
I
( laaj) UOIIUAai:l
O
i/1t1�
=A
O
O
rl
CPA
MC�I�
W
O
rl
N
tn
I�
W
o W Io
� o
A �M
n
O
- � N
M 1��
lr
f
N
p.4
e
�dZ
o
'
N
;
G 6222
�
i>0 W
aQ
o
a
b
7
_d
0
} N
C
a Y
m
L
$
W
�
3
�
n
g y L.0 R V W Inn0M0 (o oNO cm rN 0007 V0 ON
o
G
o cn (o n n v ao m (q In v aD v (n ^ ry m rn In n n l� I-
000mn W 0(G CD 00 0I lnn
0
E
Y n d
G S W
p�•-d�
C
7 Nn w0 wODn m n 0 o m m w ma co
p O N Ci LQ (O fO Un M N V' N C0 Cl? 0 0 tD c0 tD f0 n fO C7
G
� �
On OOM M(nOOncO fV In 000 MIn If) n0 V'OON NN MOOD
� �N NNMMMM V <7(n In In In N(0 (0 (On nn na00
@l
e
c c
Y1 a Y a
N0°a�orn�
O
°U
J
g
y
C
�g W
}N n N(0 MnN M(nn 0 0n01 ON(0. In
00D t0—NN0N a0 C000(D N00 V
�
pONM
�NMO (n o N(00Cl) a(0 n1�N 00 NM01n
E
c
oD a cn r n
G a n N
w
8
OON. eM�f rihN
�
n7
N
_O
L
�
Y
u
W
W
d
d
�O i
a
}
o
NMN NOOOV o nnRMrOp 0 N� 0 N(0 71n(OM
In In N O In .- n ao in M m n M O OD O Y'1 (0
C;
c
N
�
'b
C
U
�
0 o
Z
u
�
.�+ MNn O0) Mn Mn (O0 nM
N d Oavw mr^ OM ONE (00'N 0007
NOO
O
U
°
Y O iTi
O
y
rn
o
}
�
o
p
V
�
U
o n N
o0
N
L
V1
Gi
W
�
}
(ICn
J
'a
L
aA
i
F
z
Qa��a
I
I �
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
�1 1
O
^y 1
O '
O
M I
I
O � 1
I
GPM
I
I
1
1� O1_1 I
I
U '
� i I
O I
t I
V
1
I
1
I
I
DC '
O '
a'
a'
I
I
I
1
O�
I
CLI I
•o '
o'
o'
I
I
I
I
I
( laaj) UOIIUAai:l
O
i/1t1�
=A
O
O
rl
CPA
MC�I�
W
O
rl
N
tn
I�
W
o W Io
� o
A �M
n
O
- � N
M 1��
lr
f
N
p.4
e
�dZ
i>0 W
aQ
o
0
Z
7
_d
g
d W
} N
C
a Y
m
t
m
Z m ¢ a
J Q
n
g y L.0 R V W Inn0M0 (o oNO cm rN 0007 V0 ON
o
o cn (o n n v ao m (q In v aD v (n ^ ry m rn In n n l� I-
000mn W 0(G CD 00 0I lnn
Nfn X000 0010 o 000m 0 000D o 00 0O o0 000
c �
Y n d
G S W
p�•-d�
C
7 Nn w0 wODn m n 0 o m m w ma co
p O N Ci LQ (O fO Un M N V' N C0 Cl? 0 0 tD c0 tD f0 n fO C7
G
� �
On OOM M(nOOncO fV In 000 MIn If) n0 V'OON NN MOOD
� �N NNMMMM V <7(n In In In N(0 (0 (On nn na00
r�
fA
c c
Y1 a Y a
W�
o
z a Lm
°U
J
aD �, Lo u) N M N o n (0 p pO aD n o N
g d (Q fro ON W V 0a. 1n I�In 0
. .0.
N •� O aD n (0 (0 n n a0 N N a 0
A000 0 c0000000ODCO0 o 000000 0
�g W
}N n N(0 MnN M(nn 0 0n01 ON(0. In
00D t0—NN0N a0 C000(D N00 V
pONM
�NMO (n o N(00Cl) a(0 n1�N 00 NM01n
�NNN Mf7a V -w lo N In an ln(0(O nnr c0
8+
w
V p
O
d�
Z
a
8 d InNN (n(n M M(oN w OD00"t 01 n �r
0� (0 OD n�jnN
N V �t0 nn nln�nwnNN I�(0 O7 �M
�'� 000000 n r�r 0 r OD0 N 0111 (0
<pp0� W 000 0 000000 40 OD m aD a0O 00 001 0 00
d
d
�O i
} N W
NMN NOOOV o nnRMrOp 0 N� 0 N(0 71n(OM
In In N O In .- n ao in M m n M O OD O Y'1 (0
C;
p h o C ;Z N m
dui w MN M MIn o wr OO N ao M(nn tnOO n� N� MO
� N MMM M MM R ti V'v In (n to 00 n n0 a00
N
C
�
U 'J
In
U
0 o
Z
u
.�+ MNn O0) Mn Mn (O0 nM
N d Oavw mr^ OM ONE (00'N 0007
0 oO W
10010000
I/I V1 y 000 OnD co Ono 00000000
'd• C
m'A
Y O iTi
z W
i�"N oM0 tDnMNn x(00 N(0 (000
C M 0 n 0 N o 0 n n V n OD n O
Vi
m In d) 0 0 v 'T N N IC) Lo Ul n
a V 7V' In In In Nln
�MMM
I
I �
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
�1 1
O
^y 1
O '
O
M I
I
O � 1
I
GPM
I
I
1
1� O1_1 I
I
U '
� i I
O I
t I
V
1
I
1
I
I
DC '
O '
a'
a'
I
I
I
1
O�
I
CLI I
•o '
o'
o'
I
I
I
I
I
( laaj) UOIIUAai:l
O
i/1t1�
=A
O
O
rl
CPA
MC�I�
W
O
rl
N
tn
I�
W
o W Io
� o
A �M
n
O
- � N
M 1��
lr
f
N
p.4
r
3
0
L
a
O
V
c9
i=
O
.ti
O
U
O
0
G
b
O
0
c
0
U
2
U
G
O �
v �
� c
Q �0+
c 'D
c
F c
o �
z�
8
N
22222
�z
o
i
m
a
0
�
N
Y
F
rn
7+
�
o
N
n M N
Y
Q
� � W
ds�
N
a
�
d
d
O
O
r'I
U
up
O
0
L r
W
Y
U
ogaaeo°o
I
I
w
�� N�avNi ��b���nn r�rrr�m WoMO Oho mono m�O� aP aUa� UU�OOO.N+.N. �.M.���
d
�+ C7
s
d
0
�
a3i�3
r
3
0
L
a
O
V
c9
i=
O
.ti
O
U
O
0
G
b
O
0
c
0
U
2
U
G
O �
v �
� c
Q �0+
c 'D
c
F c
o �
z�
C� 04k ON oo 0
( laa3) uoi ;eeai2j
e
�z
o
i
PO r'7 W
I
aP�
�
ao
qe
I
�
e
Tz
m c
O
N `
� � W
ds�
N
i3 aX Xw
O
r'I
7 arnrn mono�m ma�ommm��m�rommmma�o ago ono ago o�ow o�'ow ono o�om ano mo'oo ao woo ago o�ommmo�omrnrn�rn
0
L r
W
N
I
I
O N
�� N�avNi ��b���nn r�rrr�m WoMO Oho mono m�O� aP aUa� UU�OOO.N+.N. �.M.���
�
�+ C7
I
C C
Yf aX Xn.
�
1
1
I
I
qU
O
m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 m m m N m m
N> •� Omi m m ONi Opi
7 W
M Vi y
C
N m m n l7 m n CI m m m N< N N m m m� n m m N n m
N t7 m d< N m m m r m m m m m rn O O � t7
_
Y e
z
W t�C
d �+
y m m N n r m m [7 m n N O N O m m m m
C m m t7 O m m m n r
O m
+
m
N 17� O m omp aD m m m m m m m m m m m am0 m A� am0 N
m m
e
a
cc
v
Y a w
8
I�
O 10p m Or n n n m 4G m m °i Of m Oml O O O^ O N N N
O
d 'J
Ny
00
z m
U U
ttpp pp
N Y O N
� N O
Q y O n Oj V m N O O m N m m V N n n
fV m mmm 0
m
3� m mmmm m m m m m m m m
h �
d
Z
y
m %2 N m
d
�
96
m
C� 04k ON oo 0
( laa3) uoi ;eeai2j
b
i
rl
I
qe
I
�
I
N
rl
O
r'I
I
N
I
I
�
I
�
1
1
I
I
j
I
I
I
�
cI
_
VV
I
+
�
1
I
a
cc
O
I
M
I
f �
U c
of
v
'
I
I
I
I
1
I
� T
1
I
I
I
1
I
�I
� I
QI
I
1
�I
1
I
1�1
I
� I
I
_Q I
w
1
I
N
I
I
1
O
C� 04k ON oo 0
( laa3) uoi ;eeai2j
3
c
0
a
E
0
U
04
C
ro
U�
O
U
L
O
c
0
U
ti
C
O
y
U
C
O �
U �
G
w�
ti cqs
c �
a ,a
� c
t c
o �a
zy
ME
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
w
.Y
O
O
N
wo
rl �
N
N
l�
I
_ O
w o
� M
Aee
- O 1
T
O
O
N
Ir
cd
POO
O
O
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
q1V e4 \C 9V
ON ON Z� ON ON MM = =, O
( ;aaj) uo►Ienai2j
0
z
$ �
o
rn .�
o
.F7 F
W
c�
w
� W
pip
m
QQ c
0
0
z
C
d
N � O
fWf .
I�1
7 �
U
v
} 8 W
C
0
y
f�
O> �' N W m m O m MNi M 00. O N b W O; r a r e r Vri N t�+1 O
oi OHO Q O vii 0�0 Coq V1 O� r P h
N
7 W a U a P � a T � m m m 0�0 OQO OQO OQO OHO o�p OQD oQO OQO OQO OQO OQO OQO W o�0 Or0 m m o0 Om0 m m 0�0 0�0 m m o�O 0�0 Qp. OQi
N VJ i
Y [per
Nom•
?? 7 V 0 7 0 O
N 0�0 0 O .N. 00 O
C Q o0 ao 00 M h b O t�1 �O l� oo M Q O N Q �O a0 O N M Q Q l-4 O
C
cu
z
17
8 i� Ol OQi ONi OI Oi O) aD m m m m O m 0 a0 m m� N a0 O) m W OQf
7 OI
L 00
W
} N
OO OI l7 V1 N n r f0 O Q O) OJ N N Q O) Q eq 1l q O) N O)
V. OI fp Q O. N. O O. N. O N. m O a0 t7 O IA N O)
. . .
O H O tO b O) N O) O t'I V) W C'I N Q) N N I Ol 0J h OI N
8 p
O. N
Y C
8 N A N r O N r N th Lq Q M Q N N N O O A O
m N O < tD n N m v
:7 ONi O W m m m m aD w m m m m w O m m w OJ m m ro m m m
Y T �
N 8 W
r cq
n N tcO O Gr0 N O�1 m A Q Q Iq N 0 0 1 N
C^
N N fh Cl l7 Q Q Q Q Q In I[I N N 1n N �O � N O) b O O)
Q
U 'D
by
00
x
z°
U U
.�. tON m 0 � O N N � A m
O i O V
Q W ONE m fro m
N
O
(V
m w Q w Q w Q Q Q N a0 w m
OI OJ O) O) m m m GD OJ O) m m W
d
O N
z
h C0
C f0 f� q N M l7 g N O O) N N O O) < '1 O O) O'
'� �
•g' N N� N m N Q V Q N� N ENO tOD tOO 1� r
vY. U
ME
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
w
.Y
O
O
N
wo
rl �
N
N
l�
I
_ O
w o
� M
Aee
- O 1
T
O
O
N
Ir
cd
POO
O
O
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
q1V e4 \C 9V
ON ON Z� ON ON MM = =, O
( ;aaj) uo►Ienai2j
M
o
c�
w
C
fWf .
I�1
U
v
f�
ME
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
w
.Y
O
O
N
wo
rl �
N
N
l�
I
_ O
w o
� M
Aee
- O 1
T
O
O
N
Ir
cd
POO
O
O
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
q1V e4 \C 9V
ON ON Z� ON ON MM = =, O
( ;aaj) uo►Ienai2j
I
+ "'I
M p
� a
� O
rr�
Vl
U
v� U
i�
IU
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
Q
cd
raw
I
I
YC
Q
�1
rar
YV
W
m
O
+O
V
N
w
0�0 v�y
h.l
0
O
- N
C1 rA- stA 0
n en rAAl M MCIA t-
V\ V\ \ V\ W W
( laaj) UOIIUAai2j
O
1"I
O
N
it
6>
�o
O
0
0
0
N
8
N
0
o�
F � o
�F a
m�=
�W
eQ e
a
app z
E
O � C
N V O
g
o
�
pb
d 8 �
i, N L•
O
a
F
d
�
E
c E
� a
y C O� 00 Yl � h n M 00 V1 .. �. tf O� n l� b b M � 00 7 •"� N y Vl U � � (� N N N a �
O �! �/1 n o n •+ a Vi b 7 o6 �•-i l� Vl n t� h h�_ b O�
�
8
�
L
N a T O
U
Q
N .....• a; n
•••� N M M a Vl �O �O n o0 O• T O� O+ O+ O O
w d
1••I
G
%�
Q
C
pp
°' Ovvm O oor�.o oioo• =om a
°m mm
N •• M M
N V ... m m ..... m m m m m m
i
'V'1+1
�
Q
U
N
LO
y
O
u
�
O
O
O
s�
�
Q
Y
OL
U
aTi a a in m m m e u> m m m m m m n m in � m a m m N N r a
Q VJ W
O• �
a 8 u
N iT:
r r r m m N ttpp m N m W r N N O r r N m m N r r N N m
p� N O O� m uj m N m r 01 m O N N m m N N tp O m O� m m N a O m e � �-
iu
�
y
U U
O O
O
UU
z m
0i
y
L
{rG N
N y mm
N iO a m O m< a
� O
� n
L
G
N
°e
o s
a3i�3z.3
I
+ "'I
M p
� a
� O
rr�
Vl
U
v� U
i�
IU
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
Q
cd
raw
I
I
YC
Q
�1
rar
YV
W
m
O
+O
V
N
w
0�0 v�y
h.l
0
O
- N
C1 rA- stA 0
n en rAAl M MCIA t-
V\ V\ \ V\ W W
( laaj) UOIIUAai2j
O
1"I
O
N
it
6>
�o
O
0
0
0
N
0
o�
F � o
�F a
m�=
�W
eQ e
app z
O � C
N V O
p �
�
pb
d 8 �
i, N L•
O
c E
� a
y C O� 00 Yl � h n M 00 V1 .. �. tf O� n l� b b M � 00 7 •"� N y Vl U � � (� N N N a �
O �! �/1 n o n •+ a Vi b 7 o6 �•-i l� Vl n t� h h�_ b O�
i OM. T U P T 0�0 0�0 0�0 0�0 W O�0 0�0 Ono W m O�0 P T P P P O� T
AV
o ❑
m
n d
u 8 �
O� �
O
�+ N N •-� M b � n �O N ••+ O� M �D N O. •--� N •� a0 V' � 7 � t� 00 h M v1 �O O� V n � M
G M M� b 00 N M� M N b � a vi � O� N� �n N N � r n •� K N �O a0 N� •-• �n o0
v1 aCJ
N .....• a; n
•••� N M M a Vl �O �O n o0 O• T O� O+ O+ O O
w d
O
AV
Z
°' Ovvm O oor�.o oioo• =om a
°m mm
N V ... m m ..... m m m m m m
i
M Vpl y
N 8 iii
r N p OBI m m 0 S. 0 fND 9 0 0 0 "R O N I O V 1. O
O O V N V< Ip O Q O O O :1 �2 (N'l O N
0. M
G
O
s�
z
aTi a a in m m m e u> m m m m m m n m in � m a m m N N r a
Q VJ W
O• �
a 8 u
N iT:
r r r m m N ttpp m N m W r N N O r r N m m N r r N N m
p� N O O� m uj m N m r 01 m O N N m m N N tp O m O� m m N a O m e � �-
iu
�
y
U U
O O
VO Y
UU
z m
^
N m 0 m A N O m m
{rG N
N y mm
N iO a m O m< a
N
O m
m r m m o C o 0 0
I
+ "'I
M p
� a
� O
rr�
Vl
U
v� U
i�
IU
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
Q
cd
raw
I
I
YC
Q
�1
rar
YV
W
m
O
+O
V
N
w
0�0 v�y
h.l
0
O
- N
C1 rA- stA 0
n en rAAl M MCIA t-
V\ V\ \ V\ W W
( laaj) UOIIUAai2j
O
1"I
O
N
it
6>
�o
O
0
0
0
N
00
Q
y
d
Q
m
QCp
r.l
N
u
CG
b
O
U
O
.0
a
0
s h
5azzzz
0
`8 U
s [[
r .a
U
r C
U
en y
Yrn
aWi O
r
U
tq tT oo N
a m rn lo
N to 06 O N a y
M M M y
Q �
U
A
d
Lt
r `° .o
O
t
C6« y
O �
e`3i�3 -Z 3
W
M+
0
Al
u
W
0
A�
'A
V1
IA
u
oll ON ON *1 42*1 00 cc
;aa3) UOggAaia
0
�o
ql
'rl
N
1.1
O
O
w
� V
f.
A
O
O
IV
0
N
0
O
N
L
CO
L
L
O
go
00
O
cn
}
Q
N
I }�
I
d
0
0
.7 >
� � W
Qd
o
z
OD
COD
d 8 W
r "t
O
rA
p- C
°
Z .0, m
rop �' N N t7 m m m r m m n N tnp V pal O tnD O phi m< tOp M A N m tmp M O O n
� m �i m m m m to m m m m m �i m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmm m
yW
N V1
W 8r Y
O spy
r N W
y
C m OI m m R m m C�! N O m^ m O N m m m O a (+l m oq fl m m II m m c9 O V m N
^ m I� N m m m m N m m O m a m^ O M N m 0 n Pl m M a n t7 m n N m 'tt aD
V
d i
C
i a Y d Y
ma
DU
z °jm
0� h
� C t+l N ti pf tD a p� N m m m N N N^ n v
Y O t+l IV O O O m 0 n r tp tp m 0 0 0 0 0
4� m m rn m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
W
f7 y
_W
W � W
d
r N m m ar t+! m m m t7 O m CI n m O O m p�
L. m M r t7 n m a m m m M m m m m C N f7
p m a fV Pl O N O N N !T tV t0 m 0 (•) t0 tD
N N M
^
aG +
C
m
O
drA
wv,
Y m^ m m to
N m amo N N N N ' O O N N a m tm0 N� {mp m y
V C ^ O m m f� �
L a a
th ^ n m m N f� m N n m aD M N N m ^ t7 O N N N O N M
G O M C'! h a< pi tV fC m N f7 O a N A A � m�� pi O tU tD O
d V
U an
y
0 0
0
UU
z
N N^ N m N t7 m t+l a m
in r m N N
n n tp o co a m m m -
O C o 0 o f� I� n r ri ri tT 0 0
i. O m m m O� m m m m m m m m tT Ot
i
VI y w
W
ti
r N O t0l V m m O W N tnp N N r Npp
W
M+
0
Al
u
W
0
A�
'A
V1
IA
u
oll ON ON *1 42*1 00 cc
;aa3) UOggAaia
0
�o
ql
'rl
N
1.1
O
O
w
� V
f.
A
O
O
IV
0
N
0
O
N
L
CO
L
L
O
go
00
O
cn
}
Q
N
I }�
I
CCS
a�
c�
a�
� M
i•i
a ° N
rx „
Vyy
0
0
O
O
N
Iood b# u0113as ssoja
•
■
MEMIC
O
O
kn
°o
0
0
M
O
O
N
°o
0
°o
0
O
a1
0
00
w
z
C
S �
0
0
O
O
O
M
O
O
N
0
0
O
O O� 00 l- �z N IRV M N 7-4 O 01 w l- IZ kn 'RT M N
O 01 41 01 01 O� ON 01 ON 01 ON w 00 00 00 Ci0 00 00 00 GO d0
OJ) NOI VAT121
c
c
E
0
L
i U
M V
V] O
� a
0
a
N
■
CC ti
u
v� o
�Ic a
}
3 3
F H
IT 0
I I
3 '-
y
R �
F
O O
Ir L
3
H a
0 0
I �
3
ro G4
H a
0 0
a� a�
3
F �
o p;
Q �
as �
X
I
•
i
sm
•
•
0
Iood Z# uoi aas ssoaa
1p
•
auig T# u0113as ssoaa
■
•
■
O
O
kn
°o
0
0
M
O
O
N
°o
0
°o
0
O
a1
0
00
w
z
C
S �
0
0
O
O
O
M
O
O
N
0
0
O
O O� 00 l- �z N IRV M N 7-4 O 01 w l- IZ kn 'RT M N
O 01 41 01 01 O� ON 01 ON 01 ON w 00 00 00 Ci0 00 00 00 GO d0
OJ) NOI VAT121
c
c
E
0
L
i U
M V
V] O
� a
0
a
N
■
CC ti
u
v� o
�Ic a
}
3 3
F H
IT 0
I I
3 '-
y
R �
F
O O
Ir L
3
H a
0 0
I �
3
ro G4
H a
0 0
a� a�
3
F �
o p;
Q �
as �
X
I
n
C�
M
� a �
po
� O
a °
a�
bA
0
0
0
0
N
r
i
1
i
loud 9# uolj08s ssa:D
al}}la g# uolloas ssao
v
O
0
�o
O
kn
0
w
ICI
0
M
0
0
N
S
1 O
p ON w P �c kn M N
O ON ON O� 01 O� 01 Q\ Q\ Q\ O� 00 00 GO CO 00 00 CO 00 00 00
r-I
(U) NOIZVA:I'I:4
a
N
DC �
■
W O
hw
a u
V
C/1 O
� a
0
00
v
3 �
ca O
F �
o ti
a�i O
> a
a
o�
A
F a
0 0
>4 >4
1
on
as
3 �
ca �
0 0
�I
•
ou
as
3 d
ca �
h 3
0 0
I
3 3
� F
F
0 0
ol
Q
I II
Appendix E - Wetland Assessment
No wetland monitoring has taken place at the Cross Creek Stream Restoration Site.
Cross Creek Stream Restoration Project (105) Page 49
Stantec — Monitoring Year 5 of 5 - Final November 2010