20100103 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20100311

i
I '- 0� UJ
MCDONALDS POND RESTORATION SITE
2010 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
Richmond County, North Carolina
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
Design Firm: International Paper
Prepared for: NCDENR — ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM �
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1619
r �
tem
424,'e'Wht
raoa�
January 2011

J
This Page Left Blank Intentionally

MCDONALDS POND RESTORATION SITE
2010 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED BY:
Resource Manegoment SeNiCe, LLC
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE, LLC
PROJECT MANAGER: TONY DOSTER
2704 -C Exchange Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
AND
an Atkins company
PBS &J, an Atkins company
PROJECT MANAGER: JENS GERATZ
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Raleigh, NC 27609
January 2011

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
In response to a Request for Proposal (RFP, No. 16-1304016) issued in December of 2003, International
Paper Company JP) proposed the establishment of the McDonalds Pond Restoration Site (hereafter
referred to as the "Site ") located in Richmond County, approximately two (2) miles northeast of the town
of Hamlet and three (3) miles east of the town of Rockingham. In order to provide stream channel
restoration and riverine wetland restoration, IP has removed the McDonalds Pond Dam (Dam) located on
Falling Creek. The Site comprises approximately 128 acres, and includes the 17.7 acre McDonalds Pond
(a.k.a Shepards Lake), portions of Falling Creek, numerous headwater tributaries and over 80 acres of
forested riparian wetlands, seepage wetlands, and marsh wetlands.
The Dam was removed in a manner to minimize potential impacts to water resources. Gradual
dewatering and phased dam removal were undertaken to avoid introducing sediments and pollutants into
the receiving Falling Creek reaches downstream. Heavy equipment operated from or within the footprint
of the former Dam during dam removal operations, thereby minimizing the impact to the adjacent intact
forest and wetland soil. Dam removal began with the dewatering (lowering) of the pond in the fall of
2005, followed by the clearing of trees and small bushes from the former earthen dam in February 2006.
Excavation activities continued for approximately two weeks until dam removal was complete in mid -
March 2006.
PBS &J initiated beaver management and minor grading activities on the former Dam location during
Year 4 monitoring. Beaver management was performed by the USDA wildlife service, and grading was
then performed in order to remove the existing beaver dam and further lower the elevation of the former
Dam footprint. Once grading activities were complete, an approximate 2 -acre area was replanted.
Monitoring Plan
Monitoring activities began in March 2006 (Year 1), and were performed for five years. Project success
is based on a comparison of post removal monitoring data collected from 2006 -2010 to reference sites as
well as biological baseline values collected in September 2004. Primary success criteria of the project
include: 1) the successful classification of restored/enhanced stream reaches as functioning systems,
2) channel stability indicative of a stable stream system, 3) development of characteristic lotic aquatic
communities, 4) establishment of wetland hydrology (as defined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
[USACE] Wetlands Delineation Manual) within the former pond footprint, and 5) vegetative success of
320 stems /acre after the third year of monitoring and 260 stems /acre after the fifth and final year of
monitoring. The following monitoring report describes the results of the final year of monitoring
activities completed during (20 10) Year 5 monitoring.
Year 5 Monitoring Results (2010)
Stream Assessment
Following five years of passive stream restoration on the Site, Falling Creek now contains braided,
anastomosed, bifurcated, and single- threaded channels characteristic of the area. Restored and enhanced
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

stream segments across the Site have stream pattern, profile, and dimension similar to that of reference
reaches. In addition, stream banks have stabilized with native planted and volunteer vegetation.
Aquatic community assemblages within the former pond have maintained characteristics of a natural lotic
system. Fifty percent (50 %) of the macroinvertebrate samples taken in October 2010 (Year 5) from
restored segments of Falling Creek (within the former pond) consisted of macroinvertebrate genera
predominantly found in lotic systems. Genera predominantly found in lentic systems represented only
five percent (5 %) of species collected within the former pond from the Year 5 samples. A comparison of
aquatic community assemblages from 2006 -2010 indicates the successful development of a characteristic
lotic aquatic community.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Habitat Assessment Forms (HAFs) were completed
at multiple locations along the restored and enhanced segments of Falling Creek. The HAF scores
quantitatively increased in each of the five monitoring years and indicate that the restored and enhanced
stream segments contain in- stream habitat characteristic of reference reaches.
Wetland Vegetation Assessment
Vegetation monitoring was performed based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Levels 1 and 2 at
eight (8) 10 x 10 meter plots. Based on Year 5 monitoring, the average count of surviving planted species
is 491 stems per acre, which exceeds the established success criteria of 260 stems /acre. If volunteer
species are included, the total survival increases to 4,467 stems per acre. Vegetation success criteria were
met in each of the five monitoring years indicating the establishment of an appropriate vegetative
community.
Wetland Hydrology Assessment
All four groundwater gauges (Gauges 1 -4) located on -Site have registered water levels within the upper
12 inches of the soil surface for at least 28 consecutive days (Richmond County, NRCS) or 12.5 percent
(12.5 %) of the growing season. With the exception of 2009 (gauge 3 malfunction), all groundwater
gauges on the Site achieved success criteria within each of the five monitoring years indicating the
establishment of wetland hydrology in the former pond footprint.
Summary
Following the fifth year of monitoring, restored streams within the former pond have developed stable,
lotic conditions typical of reference systems. Pattern, profile, and dimension data obtained from channel
surveys indicate that stream geomorphology continues to shift toward that of reference reaches.
Groundwater gauge data within the former pond indicates restored wetland hydrology and closely
resembles that of the upstream reference gauge. Vegetation surveys support the establishment of a
Streamhead Pocosin /Atlantic White Cedar forest community with thriving planted and volunteer species.
Stream, wetland vegetation, and wetland hydrology success criteria were met in all monitoring years
(2006- 2010). All primary project goals and objectives have been met or exceeded for this project.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
W

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ ............................... i
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................ ...............................
1
1.1 Location and Setting ............................................................................ ...............................
1
1.2 Restoration Structure and Objectives ................................................... ...............................
1
1.3 Project Objectives ................................................................................ ...............................
1
1.4 Project History and Background .......................................................... ...............................
3
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ............................ ...............................
6
2.1 Stream Assessment .............................................................................. ...............................
6
2. 1.1 Stream Channel Morphology ................................................... ...............................
6
2.1.2 Stream Problem Areas ........................................................... ...............................
1 1
2.1.3 Aquatic Communities ............................................................ ...............................
1 1
2.1.4 Habitat Assessment ............................................................... ...............................
13
2.2 Wetland Assessment .......................................................................... ...............................
15
2.2.1 Vegetation Assessment .......................................................... ...............................
15
2.2.2 Groundwater Hydrol ogy ........................................................ ...............................
17
2.2.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment ................................................. ...............................
18
REFERENCES............................................................................................................ ...............................
19
APPENDICIES
Appendix A: Figures
1. Site Location
2. Stream Monitoring Plan View
3. Habitat Composition
4. Vegetation Monitoring Plots
5. Monitoring Gauges
Appendix B: Stream Geomorphology Data
Appendix C: Aquatic Community Data
Appendix D: NCDWQ Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet: Coastal Plain
Appendix E: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix F: Groundwater Gauge Hydrograph
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
iii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.
Summary of Stream and Wetland Mitigation Units ...................................... ..............................2
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................ ..............................3
Table3.
Project Contacts ............................................................................................ ..............................4
Table4.
Project Background ....................................................................................... ..............................5
Table 5.
Baseline Morphology and Hydrologic Summary ........................................ ...............................
7
Table 6.
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ...................................... ...............................
8
Table 6a.
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ( Cont.) ........................... ..............................9
Table 6b.
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ( Cont.) ........................ ...............................
10
Table 7.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Metric Summary ............................................ ...............................
13
Table 8.
NCDWQ Habitat Assessment Form Scores ............................................... ...............................
13
Table 9.
Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot ................................... ...............................
15
Table 9a.
Stem Counts for Planted Species at New Plots ......................................... ...............................
16
Table 9b.
Stem Counts for Volunteer Species Arranged by Plot ............................... ...............................
16
Table 10.
Wetland Criteria Attainment ...................................................................... ...............................
18
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
iv

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) is currently developing stream and wetland
restoration strategies for the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03040201. As a part of this
effort, International Paper (IP) was selected to complete the McDonalds Pond Restoration Project located
in Richmond County. The McDonalds Pond Restoration Site (`hereafter referred to as the "Site ") is
located approximately two (2) miles northeast of the town of Hamlet and three (3) miles east of the town
of Rockingham between NC Route 1 and NC Route 177 (Figure 1, Appendix A).
- 1.2 Restoration Structure and Objectives
Falling Creek, the major drainage feature on -Site, was previously impounded by the McDonalds Pond
Dam (Dam), constructed over 70 years ago. Approximately 3,700 linear feet of Falling Creek and
tributaries were impacted by the construction of the Dam including streams contained within the pond
footprint, as well as stream sections located both up and downstream of the pond. In addition,
approximately 17.7 acres of riverine wetland were inundated with the construction of the Dam.
Approximately 4.2 acres of the floodplain immediately upstream of the pond were impacted by the
"backwater effect" (the backing -up of water), creating marsh wetlands with saturated conditions
unsuitable for historic wetland communities. An eroded pond outfall channel located at the northern
extent of the Dam drained adjacent wetlands and redirected historic flows away from the Falling Creek
floodplain.
Stream restoration efforts were achieved through the removal of the Dam resulting in the restoration of
2,969 linear feet of stream. The former Dam was excavated to the approximate level of the pre- existing
valley contours, allowing the stream unrestricted flow through the Site. Stream restoration efforts were
designed to utilize passive stream channel restoration processes, allowing the channel to reestablish
naturally following the removal of the Dam. Stream enhancement (Level I) was achieved through the
removal of the Dam and the filling of the northern outfall channel, which returned the historic hydrologic
characteristics (stream volume and velocity) to 770 feet of impacted stream channel downstream of the
former Dam. Riverine wetland restoration was accomplished within the former 17.7 acre pond footprint
through the excavation of the Dam and the establishment of native Streamhead Pocosin and Atlantic
White Cedar forest communities. Additionally, the Site includes the preservation of 5,800 linear feet of
stream, 77.8 acres of wetland, and 25.6 acres of upland/wetland ecotone buffer.
1.3 Project Objectives
The primary project goals include 1) the restoration of a stable, meandering stream channel through the
areas impacted by the Dam, 2) the restoration of historic lotic aquatic communities that represent the
Site's natural range in variation, 3) the restoration of historic wetland conditions within the pond
footprint, and 4) the restoration of natural wetland plant communities within their historic locations.
Additional potential benefits of the project include the restoration of wildlife functions associated with a
riparian corridor and stable stream and the enhancement of water quality function in the on -Site,
upstream, and downstream segments of Falling Creek and tributaries.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

The specific goals of this project are to:
• Restore approximately 2,969 linear feet of historic stream course, flow volumes, and patterns
through the marsh wetlands, McDonalds Pond footprint, and immediately downstream of the
existing dam.
• Enhance an additional approximate 770 linear feet of Falling Creek downstream of the restored
stream channel extending into the gas line easement (Figure 2, Appendix A)
• Protect the headwaters of Falling Creek that are located within the Site through preservation of
approximately 5,800 linear feet of Falling Creek and associated tributaries.
• Restore approximately 17.7 acres of forested riverine wetlands within the McDonalds Pond
footprint.
• Enhance 4.2 acres of forested riverine wetlands within the marsh wetlands located at the head of
McDonalds Pond.
• Preserve 77.8 acres of forested riverine wetlands adjacent to Falling Creek and associated
tributaries.
• Restore and enhance habitat for vegetation and wildlife species, characteristic of Streamhead
Pocosin and Atlantic White Cedar Forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
• Enhance the function and value of the Falling Creek wetland community through the preservation
of 25.6 acres of buffer along the Falling Creek stream/wetland complex.
Table 1. Summary of Stream and Wetland Mitigation Units
Restoration Activities
Linear
feet
Acres
Mitigation
Ratios
Percentage
of Mitigation
Units
Mitigation
Units
Stream Restoration
1,784
N/A
1:1
75
1
1,784
Stream Restoration
(undefined channel)
1,185 185
N/A
1:1
1,185
Stream Enhancement (Level I)
770
N/A
1:1.5
513
Stream Preservation
5,800
N/A
1:5
1 25
1,160
Total Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) Provided
4,642
Total SMUs Under Contract
4,364
Wetlands Restoration
N/A
17.7
1:1
75
17.7
Wetland Enhancement
N/A
4.2
1:2
25
2.1
Wetlands Preservation
N/A
19
1:5
3.8
Total Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) Provided
23.6
Total WMUs Under Contract
23.4
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
N
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site '

1.4 Project History and Background
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
*NA
July 2005
August 2005
Final Design (90 %)
*NA
July 2005
August 2005
Construction
*NA
N/A
March 2006
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
*NA
N/A
March 2006
Bare Root Seedling Installation
*NA
N/A
March 2006
Mitigation Plan
*NA
June 2006
July 2006
Final Report
*NA
Oct 2006
Oct 2006
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec 2006
Oct 2006
Dec 2006
Year 1 Stream Monitoring
Dec 2006
Oct 2006
Dec 2006
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec 2007
Oct 2007
February 2008
Year 2 Stream Monitoring
Dec 2007
Oct 2007
February 2008
Year 3 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec 2008
Oct 2008
Dec 2008
Year 3 Stream Monitoring
Dec 2008
Oct 2008
Dec 2008
Year 4 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec 2009
Oct 2009
Feb 2010
Year 4 Stream Monitoring
Dec 2009
Oct 2009
Feb 2010
Remedial Earthwork and Supplemental Planting
Sep 2009
Sep 2009
Sep 2009
Year 5 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec 2010
Sep 2010
Dec 2010
Year 5 Stream Monitoring
Dec 2010
Sep 2010
Dec 2010
*NA — Scheduled completion dates unknown due to unanticipated project delays.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
3
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

Table 3. Project Contacts
Designer
6400 Poplar Avenue
International Paper
Memphis, TN 38197
(901) 419 -1854
Construction Contractor
28723 Marston Road
Environmental Repair, Inc.
Marston, NC 28363
(910) 280 -6043
Planting Contractor
Garcia Forest Service, Inc.
PO Box 789
Rockingham, NC 28379
(910) 997 -5011
Resource Management Service, LLC
2704 -C Exchange Drive
(Supplemental Planting)
Wilmington, NC 28405
910- 790 -1074
Seeding Contactor
Environmental Repair, Inc.
28723 Marston Road
Marston, NC 28363
(910) 280 -6043
Nursery Stock Suppliers
International Paper
5594 Highway 38 South
Blenheim, SC 29516
(843) 528 -3203
North Carolina Division of Forest Resources
726 Claridge Nursery Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
(919) 731 -7988
ArborGen
P.O. Box 840001
Summerville, SC 29484
(843) 851 -4129
Monitoring Performers
PBS &J an Atkins company
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 876 -6888
Stream and Wetland Monitoring POC
Jens Geratz
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

Table 4. Project Background
Project County
Richmond
Drainage Area
2.5 square miles
Impervious cover estimate ( %)
<5 percent
Stream Order
3rd order
Physiogra hic Region
Southeastern Plains
Ecoregion (Griffith and Omernik)
Sandhills
Rosgen Classification of As -built
DA5/E5
Cowardin Classification
Stream (R2UB2)
Dominant soil types
Johnston (JmA)
Ailey (AcB, AcC)
Candor - Wakulla Complex (CaC, WcB)
Reference Site ID
Falling Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03040201
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -07 -16
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
WSIII
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
303d listed segment?
Yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Aquatic weeds
Percent of project easement fenced
NA
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
5
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
The monitoring results described herein document the Year 5 (2010) monitoring activities. Stream
monitoring activities continued at two (2) stream reaches that were established in April 2006. Each
monitoring reach is approximately 150 feet in length and is comprised of one (1) stream cross - section
where stream profile and dimension are monitored. Another 575 feet of stream channel profile and eight
(8) cross - sections were added to the Site monitoring activities in October 2006 (Figure 2, Appendix A).
Wetland vegetation monitoring activities were conducted in September 2010 and consist of an inventory
of planted and volunteer species within eight (8) plots located throughout the former pond
(Figure 4, Appendix A). Wetland hydrology monitoring activities include groundwater gauge monitoring
conducted throughout the growing season (March 27 - November 5) (NRCS 1999) at four (4) gauges
located within the former pond (Figure 5, Appendix A).
2.1 Stream Assessment
2.1.1 Stream Channel Morphology
Stream channel cross - sectional surveys were performed at ten (10) on -site monitoring locations in
September 2010 [XSI -8 and XSR2 -31 (Figure 2, Appendix 2). Bankfull channel geometry for surveyed
cross - sections are presented in Tables 5, 6, 6a, and 6b. Cross - section parameters were not generated for
XS2, XS7, or XS8 where stream braiding has resulted in multiple active channels. Some parameters
including width/depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius were generated
for riffles only. Stream pattern parameters including channel beltwidth, radius of curvature, meander
wavelength, and meander width ratio were also re- evaluated during Year 5 monitoring. Cross - section
plots are represented in Figures 131-1310 in Appendix B. Bankfull elevations depicted in cross - section
plots were adjusted as needed.
In general, bankfull channel parameters indicate minor change compared to conditions assessed during
Year 4 monitoring. Scouring and transportation of bank and bed material was detected at some
monitoring cross - sections where restored channels continue to migrate toward reference conditions. Soil
subsidence has diminished as herbaceous and woody vegetation further stabilize the soil and begin to
provide shading to the developing forest floor.
Stream longitudinal profile was surveyed for approximately 900 feet within the restored channel,
including the section of stream between on -Site Reach 3 and on -Site Reach 2 (Figure 2, Appendix A).
Longitudinal profile data for this portion of the stream is plotted along with previous years conditions in
Figure B -11, Appendix B. The Site's natural low gradient and the large amount of coarse woody debris
present within the channel has produced numerous depositional features (traverse and diagonal bars)
scattered among scour pools of varying sizes. As a result, longitudinal profile parameters were not
generated for the stream due to the complexity and irregularity of the channel bed.
The stream channel substrate is naturally comprised of more than 90 percent (90 %) sand throughout the
Site. As a result, substrate sampling was not conducted at the cross - sections and is not included with the
summarized cross - sectional parameters in Tables 5 -6b.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
6

y.1
u
C
O
c3
O
G
O
4
�s
c
0
Q
U
N
O
0
Q
7 o
w
U
y O
0.
E W
o W
c
r
M
i-
°°-
.--MNO
-MN
4ZZ4
z
i
U
N
W
Ej
L
o°o�jdd
*
*
*
roQQddQdQQd
aN�!N
zz
^o0
ZZ
-
ZZZZzzzzz
°oOV
N
z
z
z
z
z
Q
�
M
C
�
`V
O
d
Q
d
d
Q
d
Q
�ZzzzZZ
zzzz
zz
N
y
O
O
0
0
m
M��t
01)
Q
Q
Q
d
U
w
OtYr
QQ
-ooIn
Q
x
d
QdQQdQdd
DmO
a
*
*
*
*
cSva^
QQQd
z
Z
z
z
QQ
Z
z
Z
Z'
�o
0
0
W
Z
Z
Q
Vl�
D
dddd
dd
�^
��a-+Qd�QdQdd�
G
Z
Z
Z
Z
Zz
z
Z%.
a0a
^'
M^
z
Z
z
Z
z
z
b
—
O
0
a
oo
00
p
0
Q-
d -Q-
d
a
O
a
c
—
"IMOO
M
Z
Z
z
Z
Z
Z
w
In
O
xdddQddQQd
*
dd'"�
°owQQ
c
ZZ
"oo
ZZ
4
zzzzzzZzz
=N�`'
zzzz
zz
y
L
�
C
oQddQQQQQQ
C-4
"-I
W1
dQQQ
QQ
21Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
z
Z
Z
Z
-
-
Z
Z
z
z
z
z
OA
O
U
O
7
00
O
N
00
�
<
O
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
y
U
N
xQddQQdQdd
'nm
^oo
dQQQ
*
E
dd
*
QdMOOV
Qd
C
C
y•-
❑
--
2ZZzzZZzz%
��
v
M�ooN
00o
zzzz
z
z
�QQW
oo
z
U
L
C4
M
CQ
N
°QQQQQdQdd�
:�
ddQd
dQ
zz'z'zzzz'zz
-
-�
z
z
z
z
z
vi
b„�p
Mdi°
'!Q�i
Q4
a�
rq
yQi�ydidyid•��
U
;�Z-
Q
Q
¢¢
Q
Q¢
Q
zzzzzzzz
QQ
dQdd
Qd
z
ZZ
�R
cJ
c3
c3
v,
u
''"
'O
i
�R
33�aa
72
CL
u
3
��
��
c
b�
E
��
o
o
�
°
''�
ro
:r
w
xQs
;,`�
X33
C„)
r.
L
�
=
°
o
��a
e0
�,�
W
_
U
S,
a`li
"UL,
a�
W
3
C
0
y
N
U
4
G6
Ld
CO)
v
W
Wax
Cu7
U
r%
°
m
[z
Uba
CG
a
o
U
x
°'
3
o
�
b
u
C
O
c3
O
G
O
4
�s
c
0
Q
U
N
O
0
Q
7 o
w
U
y O
0.
E W
o W
c
r

Q)
w
M
X
c
0
U
O
U
L
CQ �
c
'o a�
4 i
c N
O C%:
U �
O
CC y
wL �
1
b O
c U
tt
on
0
0
s
a
0 0
� X
� o
F U
a,
1
U
L
a�
v
L
:0
a
r
r V1 O\ Q a
06 zz
0
200 °mo6 -N1-06 O zz
0
M 41 00
zz
00 M r N rq� r r
oo O D 0— o0 o z z
�
X00 °tea o zz
> d d d d a d Q¢ Q ¢ a
2zzzzzzzzz zz
2zzzzzzzzz zz
M it it iF 9t iF ik iF 9F dF �F if
% d d d a a d d a¢ d d
2zzzzzzzzz zz
N 9E it -% ;F iF iF iE iF iE 1F dF
:Ezzzzzzzzz zz
iF dF it � * iE if -% iF -lF iF
- a¢daadda¢ dd
2zzzzzzzzz zz
�00
zzzz zz
zzzz zz
M n°oM�oodQQd QQ
2° °V, °Ozzzz zz
- °zzzz zz
00
Qdd Q¢
zzzz zz
v E E
33dQCa„�E� ��
R y Q a
O W i
O�cmCQ3w
r 3x
° u
°- U
C7
A v�
x
E
0o
o
.O
N
O
O
O
zzzz
^
N
rn
o
N
d¢
Q d
OM
1
G
M
N
r
z
z
zzzz
0
�f
b
O
y
t
c
N
c
U
X
O1
N
oc
z
z
z z
o00
N��f
zzzz
1
(AV
2
b
N—C�
O
d
d
Q Q
I=
ry
oo—
zzzz
^
a\
z
z
z
z
zzzz
O
L
t
O
O
cli
CG
U
V)
v0
U
o
zzzz
zzzz
V
2zzzz
zzzz
0o
o
b
GNN�—
In
-
O
O
O
zzzz
^
N
rn
o
N
d¢
Q d
OM
1
G
M
N
r
z
z
z z
�f
b
O
y
t
c
c
U
c
c
z
z
z z
2zzzz zzzz
0
° x*
o 11 dad d d d Q¢
zzzz zzzz
zzzz zzzz
o
0
"'M00-
--
^
L
O
zzzz
^
N�
cq
N
d¢
Q d
o
G
N
zzzz
b
c
y
t
c
c
U
c
c
zzzz
C)C)w
0 0
z 0 0 n a a
z' °oozz
77 W.� �
Q d- o o� Q¢
zz =oodzz
0
d d --� O O �
O o Q Q
zz -
°Oozz z
'z 'z zz
zz
b
7
X
E
v
U
0
0.
0
0
U
N
O
N
O
O
Q
0
z
N
L
n.
0.
w
w
00
^
L
O
^
c
X
m
b
c
y
t
c
c
U
c
c
(AV
2
b
L
t
O
CG
U
V)
v0
U
V
b
7
X
E
v
U
0
0.
0
0
U
N
O
N
O
O
Q
0
z
N
L
n.
0.
w
w
00

0
r
0
'C
c
a
'6
C
O
N
O
N
Q
z
U
w U
N �
0.
� w
� W
c
ddr
�cc
Q
Q
a
Q
Q
Q
d
d
-zzzz
z
z
,
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
a
-
�O�roQQQd
Qd
lc°.
�"
Q
a¢
a
a
a
a
Q
a
a
s
x
N
4,L)
O
N
z
z
z
z
z
z
L�
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
C
�
O
N
V1
M
O
O
�
N
V'1
O
M
^zzzz
iF
a
*
Q
i�
a
iF
a
#
a
9E
�
M
iF
jF
�F
iF
iE
*
iF
a
3F
a
dF
a
16
Q
iF
Q
rn
2Na
z
,zzzzzzzzz
z
V:
sr
U
N
y,
C`1
O
O
O,
V
N
*
a
iF
Q
iF
a
-k
a
a
*
Q
y
N
%'
iF
d
#
Q
a
Q
d
Q
a
Q
a
Q
Q
2a,
0�cON
z
z
z
z
z
z
Vi
,
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
a
a
s
z
z
z
z
z
U
,zzzzzzzzz
z
v
�
�
W�
°
'Tt
W)
V)
^
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N
oo
�
M
oo�vo
a
d
v>
>
�i
o
v
r
o
o
a
->E-
a
d
d
a
Q
vi
oo
a.—
o,
.-:
zzNM^
n
^zzzz
z
M
°
7
p
^
O
?�
#
M
r
°
r
N
.f
*
3E
*
9F
9E
iF
•�
O
•O
C
°
�
'_'
H
O,
^
z
z
N
z
z
z
z
z
z
O
-
oc
v)
c,6
z
z
U
�I
O
M°
—
M
z
z
z
z
roG
U
M
o
�
O
NZ
r-
z
z
"
00
O
N
z
z
z
z
'b
t
t
�
b0
O
W
s
kr1
O
N
O
M
r
Q
a
z
z
�"
-
N
r4;
-
O
z
z
O
oo
O
O
J
N
*
M
o0
00
7-
/-�
M
c/>
>
v
O
If)
'�
v
ov
°
z
z�"'
^,
O
N
O
z
z
6)
o%
O-
Vl
CA
O-
M
O
N
vi
^
O
z
z
N
"'
O^
f 1
61
oo
z
z
NN
o0
O
oo
oo
V
6
,
\D
O,
N
O,
r
�O
cr
V'
�n
l
U
G
N�
4°�
�
O
N
N
z
z
T*Z<*Z��
M
O,
N
2NO,p
OO�NO
�-+
!.
-
-
M
p
z
z
r
.�
cs
�'
t
p4
LL
y
i
s
L
L
CL
(yr
y
33QOCas��°
�o�0
33aQQ
a°°'�
��
Un.
U
^-^
L
U
L
U.
[.
ii
a
LLJ
OO
T
0
p
[r.
0
r
0
'C
c
a
'6
C
O
N
O
N
Q
z
U
w U
N �
0.
� w
� W

0
axi
0
v
a
`o
C4
c
0
a.
0
a
c
0
Q
U
►
N
0
0
Q
O
z
U
.o
a
a
w
w
9
i
N
5.
+
V
CC
�"
�
OA
O
O
u
�
x
�¢Q¢¢¢¢¢QQ
¢Q
o
-o
2
Z
Z
z
Z
Z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
ML
W¢
Q
a
a
a¢¢
Q
Q
a
s
:;_zzzzzzzzz
zz
00
cn�/
1�
M
�^
iF
¢
if
a
iE
a¢
iF
iE
Q
iF
Q¢
it
if
a
jF
a
iE
a
3(-
Q
z
ozzzzzzzzz
ea
F¢
Q
Q¢
Q¢
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
2zzzzzzzzz
zz
zzzzzzzzz
zz
ss
�sr
W,6�
v
EE
33acao
C
l.Ea
bb
rte,
�
a�
C
cs
❑
❑
cs
x
cf
e
t
U
y
0.
�
._
0
0
5
7
o
Ln
U
y
1r
A
0
axi
0
v
a
`o
C4
c
0
a.
0
a
c
0
Q
U
►
N
0
0
Q
O
z
U
.o
a
a
w
w
9

2.1.2 Stream Problem Areas
No stream problem areas were observed during Year 5 monitoring. During Year 4 monitoring, PBS &J
initiated beaver management and minor grading activities on the former Dam location. Grading efforts
have successfully reduced the opportunity for beavers to re- construct dams on -Site and no further beaver
activity has been observed.
2.1.3 Aquatic Communities
Benthic macroinvertebrates were sampled within Falling Creek during Year 5 monitoring in late
September 2010. Aquatic community data, located in Appendix C, are based on laboratory identifications
of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa by Pennington and Associates, Inc., a NCDWQ- certified lab. A
temporal comparison between collected benthic habitat and their preferences are provided in Graph 1.
Fifty percent (50 %) of the macroinvertebrate ;samples collected during Year 5 monitoring from restored
segments of Falling Creek (within the former pond) consisted of macroinvertebrate genera predominantly
found in lotic systems. Genera found in both lotic and lentic systems (with a preference for lotic)
increased three percent within Falling Creek, while genera favoring lentic and lotic (with a preference for
lentic) decreased. Genera predominantly found in lentic systems made up only five percent of taxa
collected from Falling Creek. Overall, the Year 5 data indicates an aquatic community assemblage that
continues to transition from lentic to lotic as favorable habitat increases within Falling Creek.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 I McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
11

Graph 1. Comparisons between collected benthic macroinvertebrates and their habitat
preferences (Source: Merritt and Cummins 1984).
Baseline Habitat Preferences
Year 2 Habitat Preferences
Year 4 Habitat Preferences
- Lotic (27 %)
Lotic & Lentic (9 %)
Lentic & Lofic (27 %)
Lentic (36 %)
Lotic (50%)
Lotic & Lentic (2l %)
Lenfic & Lofic (25%)
Lentic (4 %)
Lotic (49 %)
Lotic & Lentic (24 %)
Lentic & Lotic (20 %)
Lentic (7 %)
Year 1 Habitat Preferences
Year 3 Habitat Preferences
Year 5 Habitat Preferences
- Lotic (52 %)
Lofic &Lentic (13 %)
Lentic & Lotic (31 %)
Unknown (4 %)
Lotic (58 %)
©
Lotic &Lentic (19 %)
o Lentic & Lotic (14 %)
Lenfic (8 %)
Lotic (50 %)
Lotic & Lentic (27 %)
Lentic & Lotic (18 %)
Lentic (5 %)
In addition to benthic macroinvertebrate habitat preference comparisons, other comparative metrics
including the total number of organisms collected, the total taxa represented in the collection, the richness
(diversity) of EPT taxa, and the biotic index can be used to evaluate aquatic habitat restoration. Table 7
summarizes the mean values for all these metrics from benthic macroinvertebrates collected within
Falling Creek prior to dam removal and all subsequent monitoring years.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
12

r-
v�
v1
Data from 2006 -2007 monitoring suggests that there may have been an initial colonization spike of
opportunistic species during the early successional stages of stream development. While the total number
of organisms collected in 2006 has not been :surpassed in subsequent monitoring years, the Year 5 data
represents the lowest biotic index recorded during project monitoring. A decrease (improvement) in the
biotic index indicates a macroinvertebrate community less tolerant of organic wastes (analogous to
improved water quality). Compared to baseline (2005) values, Year 5 summary data represents a
continued progression towards a restored aquatic community composition.
2.1.4 Habitat Assessment
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Habitat Assessment Forms (HAFs) were completed
at each cross - section location across the Site (Appendix D). Minor improvements in HAF scores were
observed during Year 5 monitoring. This improvement is largely due to the favorable prevalence of in-
stream habitat including sticks, snags, logs, leafpacks, and macrophytic vegetation as well as an increase
in stream shading. The HAF mean score from restored and enhanced stream segments quantitatively
increased in each of the five monitoring years; The HAF scores are summarized in Table 8.
Table 8. NCDWQHabitat Assessment Form Scores
Table 7. Benthic Macroinvertebrate
Metric Summary
Monitoring Year
Total Organisms
Total Taxa
EPT Richness
Biotic Index*
Baseline (2005)
32
15
2
7.42
Year 1 (2006)
209
35
16
5.33
Year 2 (2007)
187
38
12
4.95
Year 3 (2008)
73
24
8
5.21
Year 4 (2009)
148
37
12
5.43
Year 5 (20 10)
150
33
10.5
4.27
*The biotic index is derived from North Carolina Tolerance Values that are assigned to each collected species. These Tolerance
Values range from 0 for organisms intolerant of organic wastes to 10 for organisms very tolerant of organic wastes.
Data from 2006 -2007 monitoring suggests that there may have been an initial colonization spike of
opportunistic species during the early successional stages of stream development. While the total number
of organisms collected in 2006 has not been :surpassed in subsequent monitoring years, the Year 5 data
represents the lowest biotic index recorded during project monitoring. A decrease (improvement) in the
biotic index indicates a macroinvertebrate community less tolerant of organic wastes (analogous to
improved water quality). Compared to baseline (2005) values, Year 5 summary data represents a
continued progression towards a restored aquatic community composition.
2.1.4 Habitat Assessment
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Habitat Assessment Forms (HAFs) were completed
at each cross - section location across the Site (Appendix D). Minor improvements in HAF scores were
observed during Year 5 monitoring. This improvement is largely due to the favorable prevalence of in-
stream habitat including sticks, snags, logs, leafpacks, and macrophytic vegetation as well as an increase
in stream shading. The HAF mean score from restored and enhanced stream segments quantitatively
increased in each of the five monitoring years; The HAF scores are summarized in Table 8.
Table 8. NCDWQHabitat Assessment Form Scores
Cross - section
Score
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
XSRI (Reference)
98
98
96
98
98
XSR4 (Reference)
97
97
96
95
96
Mean (Reference)
97.5
97.5
96
96.5
97
XSl
78
95
91
93
93
XS2
80
80
82
89
88
XS3
84
98
93
93
93
XS4
63
66
75
83
84
XSR2
88
93
88
88
91
XS5
69
80
83
83
83
XSR3
85
90
1 88
87
88
XS6
65
71
74
77
75
XS7
74
76
82
77
80
XS8
86
90
91
90
90
Mean
81.9
87.0
87.3
88.4
88.9
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
13
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

Stream habitat characterizations depicting aquatic in -stream habitat composition were completed using
plan-view drawings derived from total station surveys of the stream monitoring reaches. Drawings were
updated in the field through visual observation and habitat composition was transcribed onto each
drawing by hand. Drawings were digitized using GIS technology to determine rough estimates of habitat
type representation. Representative habitat includes adjacent stream bank trees, root mats/balls, stumps,
coarse woody debris, and undercut banks. Figure 3 (Appendix A) depicts the Year 5 stream habitat
composition. Compared to previous monitoring years, Reaches 2 and 3 show both an increase in habitat
quantity, and habitat type, particularly with regards to in stream woody debris. Reaches 2 and 3 still
contain an abundance of macrophytic vegetation compared to the reference reaches (1 and 4). The
macrophytic vegetation is expected to diminish as the riparian community continues developing, and
shading increases.
During Year 5 benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring, an increase in the number of collectors (both
gathering and filtering) and scrapers was observed. The increased abundance of collectors and scrapers
suggests a possible increase in their available food source, macrophytes and fine particle organic matter
respectively. This may be attributed to an increase in riparian litterfall and organic input from the
surrounding floodplain. Year 5 monitoring also indicates a decrease in the number of predators and
shredders, although predators still make up the largest relative abundance. The following graph displays
functional feeding group composition following dam removal at the Site.
Graph 2. Functional Feeding Group Composition
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
14

2.2 Wetland Assessment
2.2.1 . Vegetation Assessment
Eight (8) 10 x 10 meter plots (VP 2 -7 and' VP 9 -10) were sampled in accordance with the Carolina
Vegetation Survey Protocol (Figure 4, Appendix A). Vegetation plots 9 and 10 were installed last year
following the remedial grading activities performed on the footprint of the former dam. Success criteria
for vegetation requires that at least 320 stems per acre must survive after the completion of the third
growing season. The required survival criterion will decrease by 10 percent per year after the third year of
vegetation monitoring (i.e. for an expected 260 stems per acre for Year 5). The Site is currently meeting
the established success criteria for vegetation based on the survival of the planted species with an average
density of 491 stems per acre. Including all volunteer species raises the vegetation survival within the
Site to 4,467 stems per acre.
Both plots 9 and 10 are exceeding the required survival criterion with an average density of 607 stems per
acre and 647 stems per acre respectively (average density of 627 stems per acre). As discussed with EEP,
if vegetation success of remedial planted stems within plots 9 and 10 are on target at the end of Year 5,
then no additional vegetative monitoring will be required
An inventory of planted stems within plots 2 -7 are given in Table 9, and an inventory of planted stems
within new plots 9 -10 are given in Table 9a. The Site met the density requirement for success in all
monitoring years. A tally of volunteer woody species is listed in Table 9b. Year 5 photographs of
vegetation plots are provided in Appendix E.
Table 9. Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot
Initial
. Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 5 Plots*
Totals
Totals
Totals
Totals
Totals **
Totals **
Species
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
2
M45
6
7
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Chamaecyparis
2
3
2
2
6
5
32
162
31
157
31
157
30
152
23
155
20
135
thyoides
Liriodendron
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
30
6
30
3
15
1
5
1
7
1
7
tulipifera
Magnolia
1
3
0
0
0
0
10
51
10
51
11
56
5
25
5
34
4
27
virginiana
Nyssa biflora
4
3
6
0 1
2
5
29
147
29
147
28
142
30
1 152
20
135
20
135
Persea borbonia
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
1
5
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pinusserotina
1
3
6
6
4
1
32
162
32
162
30
152
36
182
26
175
21
142
Pinustaeda
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
61
12
61
12
61
4
20
1
7
0
0
Site Total
122
618
121
613
116 1
588
106
536
76
513
66
446
*Plots 1 and 8 were replaced following on -Site grading. See Table 9b.
** Total values differ from previous years because Plots 1 and 8 were replaced.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
15

Table 9a. Stem Counts for Planted
Species at New Plots
Species
Year 5 Plots
Year 4 Totals
Year 5 Totals
9
10
Stems/
Plot
Stems/
Acre
Stems/
Plot
Stems/
Acre
Chamaecyparis thyoides
2
3
6
121
5
101
Liriodendron tulipifera
3
0
3
61
3
61
Magnolia virginiana
3
3
6
1 121 I
6
12l
Nyssa biflora
7
10
18
364
17
344
Site Total
33
667
31
627
Table 9b. Stem Counts for Volunteer
Species Arranged by Plot
Year 1 Totals
Year 2 Totals
Year 3 Totals
Year 4 Totals **
Year 5 Totals **
Year 5 Plots
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Stems/
Species
2
1 3
4
5
6
7
1 9*
10*
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Plot
Acre
Acerrubrum
11
11
21
1
3
30
21
0
12
61
16
81
25
126
24
121
98
496
Betula nigra
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
25
0
0
0
0
1
5
Chamaecyparis
2
0
1
0
12
3
0
0
0
0
4
20
13
66
7
35
18
91
thyoides
Cyrilla
0
2
0
0
22
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
4
20
5
25
24
121
racemifllora
Liquidambar
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
1
5
2
10
5
25
stryaciflua
Liriodendron
2
0
0
0
16
1
2
6
14
71
7
35
5
25
4
20
27
137
tulipifera
Magnolia
3
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
10
1
5
8
40
6
30
7
35
virginiana
Nyssa biflora
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
1
5
1
5
Pinusserotina
71'171
16
63
283
24
32
31
1 105
1 531
168
1 850
532
2691
339
1715
691
3495
Pinus taeda
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
147
6
30
0
0
0
0
Salix nigra
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
7
35
1
5
1
5
2
10
3
15
Clethra alnifolia
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
Baccharis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
halimifolia
Kalmia
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
angustifolia
Vaccinium
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
10
0
0
0
0
2
10
corymbosum
Lyonia lucida
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
Ilex glabra
0
0
0 1
0 1
0
0 1
0 1
5 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0
0
0
0
5
25
Site Total 1
144 1
728 1
236 1
1193 1
596
3013
390
1971
883
4465
*New vegetation plot established following on -Site grading. See previous Table 9a.
** Total values differ from previous years because Plots 1 and 8 were replaced.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
16

v
2.2.2 Groundwater Hydrology
Success criteria for groundwater hydrology on the Site requires that wetland mitigation areas be inundated
or saturated (within 12 inches of the surface) �by surface or groundwater for at least 28 consecutive days
(Richmond County, NRCS) or 12.5 percent of the growing season (March 27 - November 5).
Groundwater gauge locations (Gauges 1- 4) are depicted in Figure 5 (Appendix A). Groundwater gauge
hydrographs are plotted on Figure F -1 in (Appendix F). All four groundwater gauges located on -Site are
currently meeting the wetland hydrologic success criteria. Gauge 3 likely recorded groundwater within
12 inches of the surface longer than the reported 75 days, but gauge malfunction resulted in data loss from
July 20 through September 2. With the exception of 2009 (gauge 3 malfunction), all groundwater gauges
on the Site achieved success criteria within each of the last five monitoring years indicating the
establishment of wetland hydrology in the former pond footprint.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
17

2.2.3 Wetland Criteria Attainment
Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment
Year
Gauge ID
Gauge Hydrology
Threshold Met?
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Gauge 1
Yes
201 days (89% of growing season)
1
Yes
2
Yes
2006
Gauge2
Yes
98 days (44% of growing season)
3
Yes
4
Yes
(Year 1)
Gauge3
Yes
216 days (96% of growing season)
5
Yes
6
Yes
Gauge4
Yes
205 days (91% of growing season)
7
Yes
8
Yes
Gauge
Yes
105 days (47% of growing season)
1
Yes
2
Yes
2007
Gauge2
Yes
96 days (43% of growing season)
3
Yes
4
Yes
(Year 2)
Gauge3
Yes
212 days (94 % of growing season)
5
Yes
6
Yes
Gauge4
Yes
131 days (58% of growing season)
7
Yes
8
Yes
Gaugel
Yes
58 days (26% of growing season)
1
Yes
2
Yes
2008
Gauge2
Yes
58 days (26% of growing season)
3
Yes
4
Yes
(Year 3)
Gauge3
Yes
74 days (33% of growing season)
5
Yes
6
Yes
Gauge4
Yes
72 days (32% of growing season)
7
Yes
8
Yes
Gauge
Yes
42 days (19% of growing season)
2
Yes
3
Yes
2009
Gauge2
Yes
38 days (17% of growing season)
4
Yes
5
Yes
(Year 4)
Gauge3
NA
Gauge Malfunction
6
Yes
7
Yes
Gauge4
Yes
47 days (21% of growing season)
9
Yes
10
Yes
Gauge
Yes
85 days (38 % of growing season)
2
Yes
3
Yes
2010
Gauge2
Yes
78 days (35% of growing season)
4
Yes
5
Yes
(Year 5)
Gauge3
Yes
75 days (33% of growing season)
6
Yes
7
Yes
Gauge4
Yes
85 days (38% of growing season)
9 9
Yes
Yes
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
18
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

�.1
J
REFERENCES
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1999. Soil Survey of Richmond County, North
Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture.
Rosgen, D. 1994. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology. Wildland Hydrology: Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
W,
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

�J
,J
i
,J
t�
U
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
APPENDIX A: FIGURES
A
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

f'-
- �� CONSERVATION
CEASMENT e d
LAT 34.924 n
LONG 79.682
m % J . r
f _
J (( q�
COUNTY
Or`
759 7'ar.�pME
0Api 2,000 0 2,000
l -� s �;, • FEET
3 YADKIN -PEE DEE RIVER BASIN
�(CU 03040201)
,8 Ill
2 /�I
'to R I LH M O N
Hn lima
r j
1 Mamvn
IdS ]pr0el I
�c o8aec
° ROC
w,s Ha =gnt �
4 . I Hamlet
-� � 3i ` "' RICHMOND COUNTY
INTERNATIONAL® PAPER z
ewN e.
MCG FIGURE
SITE LOCATION C°oBy
McDONALDS POND RESTORATION SITE GoTE JVV
l',crnt �ictt �
a, Atkins company NOV 2010
- - EEP Project No. D04020 -2
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA PH°'E`T N
00004932

®
i
Q
O
N
p
In
N
4`
O
E6i.
Z
o
6
®
�..... <
r� ....
Q! Y
� O N z Z
Q V � J
H °o O O—
LD
Z
m
w
II
-
w–
C)
Co cD
o
N
�
o
) n..�
J
QoQW v�
ON
Q� �3
°mow
w
_
w
N
Q
0 z�
>
-
�C
a
�r''..
0
N �
a
�
U)
3
z
w
Q
/
=
0
CV
C
H
w
W Z
w
m
a
U)
/
z z Z
O O W W O
F-
Q
OQ w O0 00U ¢ �
D cr w d CO LU Z �
Z p p p oC cr z W d
W z Q Q Q Q w Q Q Q
O w w p w w w
W cr cr Z cr cr Ir
HiRl
HHEI
ffiEm
w m 11
u
w 11
// \\ cr 11
ux � I
X I
oil /I
Ilw
2k// I
10
// H Z
/i Q w / I
> E // I
X LU
CO = Z W
U O // II
W
I
cr �� I
X
X
£B UVN O
O
N
i
LO
a
Q
w
/
0
CV
U)
/
11
co
X
/
x
W
U
/ C/) W I
/
(7
W
O
z
LLI
aC
J
Z
O
Cl)
Q
cr
z
/
/
Z
U
D
\\
N
U)
/ /
W
C3
Cn
J
\\ //
U)
I X
u
(
I
I I
I
I
r II
ce
X�I
-— ________�
%/
I
11
w
I
I
I
o0 LWi
I
LO
ii
II
II
II
II
w
v_
II
II
GCE
II
II
2
Q
X
X
£B UVN O
O
N

C r» Z a Z N O O
N N O o ZJ O C w
d N cn
p } •�•+ ZQ W U� QQ— O Z a w
z00~ z� Imo °E N O .. CL �ry pa NN X� C/) 3 Z
E
ul W _U U O a
•
0
O
e
U) o O
x
a •
s
V .
C a�
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
X00
0
o ,
0
W
U
Z
W
w
W
U. _
W
CO)
et
U
Q
W
Ir
W
U
Z
W
m
W
U. o
co) LU
TT
i
a
W
1-
•
cli
U)
x e �•
0
e o N
o
0
o ./ Q u
W
o �
o
o Q o
0 0
e
•
O ��.....
e D O M
=o
C')
WT
O M
M
CO
x
Z
0
a
w
w
LIJ
Y
Z
Q
U
00
O
_
0
=
a
�-r
oUC
O
W
w
M
F-
O
z
O°
o'
Q
x
z
0
a
U
O
J
Z
_0
H
U
W
N
U)
0
cr
U
w
w
J
0
F-
F-
F-
F-
0
a
1-
•
cli
U)
x e �•
0
e o N
o
0
o ./ Q u
W
o �
o
o Q o
0 0
e
•
O ��.....
e D O M
=o
C')
WT
O M
M
CO
x

W
0
Q
O/
k ..
r
ot
f �& ,A 41 .i
a
d
> M
�a
>
N�
a
a
AA,
I.- I
W
W
LL
w
C
CD
J
0 0
Z
�o
d
3 N
N
W
~
- }
�—
z
W
N
CL
Q
o
O
a
c�
Z
F-
Z
z
O w
z_w
Q
Of
o =
O
C
o H
o
~
Z
LLJ
�'
W
U
0
>
m
J
Z U)
.
OU)
Z
CL
Z
U
wU
F-
O D
t ..
a
a
R LO
F-
Z
Z
O Q
LU
O
0
LU
w
U
CL
W
0
Q
O/
k ..
r
ot
f �& ,A 41 .i
a
d
> M
�a
>
N�
a
a
AA,
I.- I
W
W
LL
w
C
CD
J
0 0
Z
�o
d
3 N
N
W
O
�—
z
J
N
CL
Z
o
O
c�
Z
F-
a
U
j3�
Q
Of
o =
O
C
o H
o
~
Z
LLJ
�'
Z
0
>
m
Z
z OZ
Z
CL
0-0
O
wU
F-
p
O
a
a
o
F-
Z
W
O
(D
C)
w
U
�i
u
Ix
W
Q
6
® m
c
o a
E J
V Q
C z
a

i
—
E�HpGAN
— — —
U
N
J
w
�
Z
o'
O
O
r O
u
W
\\
Z
J
Z O
O Of
D
N
Q O o
(n 00
Q
Z
Z mZ
Z oZ
O O a` =)
F- CL w O
U) U
Z N
w
G11
Q
11
(X W
w�
(7
Z
U It
Z U) I
LLI
J
Z
O
O
~
Z
0
w
U
W
(7
U)
1-
Z
O
Q
M
O
C.7
LU
U
w
cn
w
O
Z
O a
U Z
In
C O
i
j
11
w
U
3
I
I
I�
IE I
II
II
I
II
II
II
II
I I
1/
,
i
i
i
,
i
�O
W
T
f8 OVN
0
w
—
E�HpGAN
— — —
w
u
N
J
�
Z
o'
O
O
r O
u
W
\\
Z
J
Z O
O Of
O
N
Q O o
(n 00
Z Of Z-
Z mZ
Z oZ
O O a` =)
F- CL w O
U) U
Z N
O ° z
G11
Q
11
(X W
w�
Ir
N w
U It
Z U) I
f
oU w `
L
j
11
w
U
3
I
I
I�
IE I
II
II
I
II
II
II
II
I I
1/
,
i
i
i
,
i
�O
W
T
f8 OVN
0
w
Lo
�
N
J
�
Z
o'
O
O
r O
u
W
Z_
J
Z O
O Of
W Q
C7 U
Q
N
Q O o
(n 00
Z Of Z-
Z mZ
Z oZ
O O a` =)
F- CL w O
U) U
Z N
O ° z
z z
O =
U
U It
f
L
W
d
G
�� 7L
� d
O a
U Z
In
C O
Q Q
c Z
W
F
Z

APPENDIX B: STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

N+
v
o
J O W N
0
T
�� �
N
�
r
S
c
(/) Z
Z
z Z
C
L
Z
O J
N d
0
T
X
CL
�
Z
N
N
�/
QOQw
N
yo
U�
al
w0
m O Z O
C
a
�
�
� ZO�H
'0
N�
�
7
W
O
$
V7
�
W
� Q'
U Z
O X
�
o
ON
ON
�
�U
o
W
U
U U S
U n
o
Q
4-fl
�
W� •• � W
O
� 0
� �
C',
In (/)
z
m m
d
N Y o 0
D U Vl d
W
Of
Q
a
(n
eo
uo
�
Z Z Z
W
L.L
N
d
N
O
O
n �
0
o
W II
C
2 Q).2
Q
Q
O O
C
"o N
0
O
W
O
C U
w
>
5�����lF�gg�
a
>
J
Q
J
=
.2E
Nw
Clf
Ill
z
O
a
o
_
f--
a
w
O -0.
Q z
C" o N
L
cn
w
o
3
Q
O
x
m O to
= z a C
+�
U O N
E c v
�^
w
a
J
F- w u to 3
� 00
O = v
0
I o; E
O O
Z
J
4
U�
= w N (n — N
U
N U
O n o C
U
m
Y
z
Y
o H Qy
U O W11
Z
m
m
m
3 w Z
N M
U
e m o `� z �' n a m^i m
Y
Q
o °° .rv. .°. `.� .iO. n r `a n m
a
m
Cn
c0 h 00 Q1 p
0000
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
0 0 0 0 0
H H H H H W
aaaaa -j
> > > > > w
WWWWW
J J J J J J
W W W W W J
W W W W W LL
0 0 0 0 0 `1
a a a a a Z
a
Q
w
C9 C9 C7 m
In
Z
O
0
Z
O
ac
O
J
x
0
O
O
a_
w
I
U
Z
�
Q
x
(% O
Z
O
J
U
•i
LLJ
Z
O
cn
N
(n
O
Y
E
O
�
Z
m
�iJ.,
ch
C.7
•�
_Z
Y
O
OJ
I
Z
Q
D]
F-
LL.
W
O
O O O 61 CO :D
o�
6) �s
J
('13)
NOIIVA3�3
v�
x
N+
v
o
0
N
�
�
c
E
d
C
L
X
�
(n
N
N
L
al
a
E
�
o
�
7
7
O
$
V7
N
W
� Q'
U Z
O X
�
o
W
U
U
a
�
N+
v
o
0
N
�
�
c
E
d
C
L
X
�
(n
N
N
L
al
a
E
�
o
�
7
7
O
U
p
V7
N
W
J

�Cs� •_
A
O
z
w
`� / E
Q
N Z
QZQ W
Z � Z
N Z -
O OU
Z
00
V1
N�Z
�.
/ r �
+
°
F
Q
Z
O
O
O
a)
(�
V
E
Z Cl:: F—
OL C
C 0
c
"0
C z
C
x
a
W
V)
c
7
V)
r
U
V)
N
V)
X
ffi
C O
.2(o)
L N
C C
C)
OO ON
�d z
Nmj Q
a
C�
i —
'-o
O
$
�w
(%1
O
u N
w
�p m
D = o
U) 04
0 V)
ca
W
>
W
m m m mm�,mmmmmm a°jmmm$'i
Z
®:
M
Q'
W U z
Of X
U
_
Q
Va
w
W
Q
W
LL
°w
0
O
�1J
0
lXJ
O
O
n
0
W N
U
Z
Q
O
_cf) O
D
J
O
Z 00
O
N_
ly-
O O
_ Q0
0
d
Cl
(-J
0
r� N O
O O O O m w r- O
O m m m
I
c0 f�a0mp
O O O O
00003
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
O O O O O j
H H - HH H
Q Q Q Q Q W J
> > > > > w
W W W W W
J J J J J J
W W W W W —)
D
W W W W W W
0 0 0 0 Q Y
Q Q Q Q Q Z
C:� w Q� Q� [if Q
0 0 0 0 U m
i
7
N N O
m U O O
O z o
O o Li
w
U O 2
3 O ..
o
m m
v v
C L O p
O U) d
r ,10�
w
N
Q
u)
O
+
°
F
Q
Z
O
O
O
a)
(�
V
E
OL C
C 0
c
"0
C z
Q
0
a
W
V)
c
7
V)
r
U
V)
N
V)
X
O U
O O
C O
.2(o)
L N
C C
C)
�
$i$S,,mmmmafOim m �immmm�1 Om'�, $i 8'i
C�
i —
'-o
O
O E n _ Nw
(%1
O
U O
N
n c
0-D
Oy
C—
O
0
m
X
u) O
L
Oa
7 Q)
Y
c°C
C
OL
°
NC
+O+
p
T
>
V)
W
>
W
m m m mm�,mmmmmm a°jmmm$'i
Z
N
M
Q
_
Q
w
z
O
H
a
O
w
O
a
O
Z
U)
u
O
O
K
O
n
w
a
V
J
w
w
g
_O
E
O
o
K
Y
J
O
~O
U
af
Cn
U
Z
Jm
Y
a
ro
Z
m
3
w
O
r n 00 a n o m y .�. °ry
0
V)
v
v
u
U)
iE
0
O
�1J
0
lXJ
O
O
n
0
W N
U
Z
Q
O
_cf) O
D
J
O
Z 00
O
N_
ly-
O O
_ Q0
0
d
Cl
(-J
0
r� N O
O O O O m w r- O
O m m m
I
c0 f�a0mp
O O O O
00003
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
O O O O O j
H H - HH H
Q Q Q Q Q W J
> > > > > w
W W W W W
J J J J J J
W W W W W —)
D
W W W W W W
0 0 0 0 Q Y
Q Q Q Q Q Z
C:� w Q� Q� [if Q
0 0 0 0 U m
i
7
N N O
m U O O
O z o
O o Li
w
U O 2
3 O ..
o
m m
v v
C L O p
O U) d
r ,10�
w
N
u)
O
+
°
N
rn
NC
L
O
_O
O
O
a)
(�
V
E
OL C
C 0
c
"0
C z
°
p>
y T
a
W
V)
c
7
V)
r
U
V)
N
V)
X
O U
O O
C O
.2(o)
L N
C C
C�
i —
'-o
O
O E n _ Nw
(%1
O
U O
N
n c
0-D
Oy
C—
O
0
m
X
u) O
L
Oa
7 Q)
Y
c°C
C
OL
°
NC
+O+
p
T
>
V)
N
L
°
3
T
>
V)
0
U
Li
.�
y
O
J
Z
N
M

J O W N
O Q O
c _ Z Z � Q O_ W T N �p
Q p _0 �N �� HJ m o z °o
J U I 00 U W � 6
O z } i QOQW �O Uof W<L 3 0
z pN �U (n
OaOON L� z= N I 3 W
W
° °' o
CL 0
M W m 6 16 m O x ii o
' o U rn a ii 0
w
Of
Q
W
H
y
w
O
C
O
O
O_
O
~
Q
Z
O
c C
.0
V)
2
Q) r
C
°i3O
II
C
o
+ O
° >
O
O
w N
C
L O
+ —
Q
�
N
°
O
.0 U
to O
N w
F-:
uy
N
N
c: Z
O�
,
+ +'
00
E
)n ay
-
23
Y
c° o
F-
) 3
��
U
Q
x
N O
m I
col U°
>
O
Z
-
N
Q
W
s
N
V)
°
aD
E
I
3
°
j
Z
O
Q o6 .rv+ o o
H
N
O
00
O
n �
T
W
U
Z
Q
(n
p O
d
J
Q
Z
O
_N
O
0
cv
0
O O O 0-) 00 � O
0-) M o-) m
('1 J) NOUVAI 3
G h (i C5 p
O O O O
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
O O O O O
�t =HHHw
aaaaa -j
> > > > > w
w w w w w
J J J J J J
W W W W W J
D
W W W W W w
0 0 0 0 0 Y
Q Q Q Q Q Z
Of CY � af CY Q
U C7 C9 0 0 m
Q
y
w
O
C
O
O
O_
O
N
c C
.0
V)
2
Q) r
C
°i3O
II
C
o
+ O
° >
O
O
w N
C
L O
+ —
C C
a
N
°
O
.0 U
to O
N w
F-:
uy
N
N
c: Z
O�
,
+ +'
00
E
)n ay
-
23
Y
c° o
F-
) 3
��
U
Q
x
N O
m I
col U°
_ E
L
° U
W� N
O
Z
-
N
M
Q
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
D
F-:
E
d
C
L
M
Ln
N
N
X
a�
s
N
°
aD
E
3
°
T
O
c
O
>
(
D >
_
_
O
U
(n
V)
l�
J
Q

0 O J M
J
N N 0
O
m
O 2 00
a o w0 0
U (7 S
U En
0
z
LLJ m m
LAJ
ti v
0
o Q <n a`
w
I
D _
O1 M'1 I N
Q N O D
WI w
LL I
U) O
w+ O
Q) O
II
a c
a�
.0
Q < ° c o 0 o v
C
C+ N
o .O OU N N
O OC
j > 8i 8i gi m ao w w m 8, ro 8' m m oo m m 8i gi 8i 8i 8i Si Q C +'
Q O
W. J ¢ ~ O O O C� N
J W S �^-� a F o y p o—
_O w Q Z N .fl
w 3 4 x = Z a � C m E C
Ln a o o I x o
Ln U) D J J O U a0a V (A a > U
Ir Z Lei. = W J W _ N O` Q O N
U m Y Y � U H Q +L+ U O W L
O
Z j m m 3 w Z N M
O
o m Z
Q H m S
m
N
r
c0 cm) 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
0 0 0 0 0
H H H H W
a Q Q a Q-i
> > > > > w
WWWWW
J J J J J J
W W W W W J
W W W W W W
0 M 0 0 0 Y Q
Q Q Q Q Q Z w
CY � Cr Q � Q
0 C7 0 0 0 m �
(n
>Z
O
0
Z
Y
O
O O
0 J
U')
X
� '{
w
J
L.�
L LL_
W % �
Z �
O X
c
� Z
_O
J �
Q � U
H W
Z Cf) Y
0 Z
Q
O m
O O �
= N U
CD
m
C.�
_Z
Y
O
O
J
O
Y
Z
Q
m
f—
N O V
O O O O� 03 O _ J
cn
(•J�) NOIIVA313 X
O
®
�
O
J
N
Z
Z �Q
Z
Ow
�
z
�
��
l��
a °aw
�O °°
wl�
N
°
N
X
ZOO~
oo ��
(%7�
�
N
p
O
O N
� O
T
T
�
c
o
j
>
�
O
�
(n
(n
LL
J
U
v
a`
w
0 O J M
J
N N 0
O
m
O 2 00
a o w0 0
U (7 S
U En
0
z
LLJ m m
LAJ
ti v
0
o Q <n a`
w
I
D _
O1 M'1 I N
Q N O D
WI w
LL I
U) O
w+ O
Q) O
II
a c
a�
.0
Q < ° c o 0 o v
C
C+ N
o .O OU N N
O OC
j > 8i 8i gi m ao w w m 8, ro 8' m m oo m m 8i gi 8i 8i 8i Si Q C +'
Q O
W. J ¢ ~ O O O C� N
J W S �^-� a F o y p o—
_O w Q Z N .fl
w 3 4 x = Z a � C m E C
Ln a o o I x o
Ln U) D J J O U a0a V (A a > U
Ir Z Lei. = W J W _ N O` Q O N
U m Y Y � U H Q +L+ U O W L
O
Z j m m 3 w Z N M
O
o m Z
Q H m S
m
N
r
c0 cm) 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
0 0 0 0 0
H H H H W
a Q Q a Q-i
> > > > > w
WWWWW
J J J J J J
W W W W W J
W W W W W W
0 M 0 0 0 Y Q
Q Q Q Q Q Z w
CY � Cr Q � Q
0 C7 0 0 0 m �
(n
>Z
O
0
Z
Y
O
O O
0 J
U')
X
� '{
w
J
L.�
L LL_
W % �
Z �
O X
c
� Z
_O
J �
Q � U
H W
Z Cf) Y
0 Z
Q
O m
O O �
= N U
CD
m
C.�
_Z
Y
O
O
J
O
Y
Z
Q
m
f—
N O V
O O O O� 03 O _ J
cn
(•J�) NOIIVA313 X
O
�
O
N
�
�
c
�
N
N
N
X
L
N
p
O
�
�
T
T
�
c
o
j
>
�
O
N
(n
(n
LL
J

J O J N
r m
N U -t
N p
m
O
O z 0
c C4 0 ° ° w LO
U U 2
3 �
o
z
CD m
a v
c v v o
o 0 U) a`
W �
t L
_ to ,n o rn w
a
L� m
vi O
C O
O O
m
�
a c
N O
Q me po ov
F Z Q co �o yap
Q U y
O o O U c U
O C
C _ 0.
i W Q G S .2 E N O N�
!Y J ¢ O O " D C w N N
W S w w e (D E! 0 0
Cn N - ° C, p K O N— U O Y
N c N
w 3 Q X S Z Q N C N C C O
w a w U 3 0
d O O I x E
N J J O U N U N O > U
Z p 1�.. S w J — N O` Q O N
Jm Y Z ~o U Q.L+ U O W
Z Z
Z D m m 3 w (V M
O Y
�sa
Q r�r���r<e a
CD
U)
cD f�aOmp
0000�
00000
zzzzz� °
00000��'
Q Q Q Q Q J .y. Iya•�j''''
% % % % %
W W W W W.rfihi -
J J J J J J - j WW1
W W W W W)
O✓ d
w w w w w�
0 0 0 0 o Y Q LLJ
� � of x � Q co
Z
O
U
Z
Y
O
,� N
(n
X
O
O
W
J
� LL-
LL)
lL.
U �
Z N
c O (n
fi X
Z
J 0
z U Y
O W Z
N_ � Q
m
FY U
O cn _
= O O U
C`J (Y _
ar
N O '` W
O O O o-) o� —I
N
('1J) NOUVA31� �
M
Z
� ZN Zz � J
� J 11
O�O(/7 Opp z= V) (14
0
O
N
O
N
�
H
C
E
N
�
vwi
cn
a
N
L
N
p
N
T
T
� w
�
�° =o
w � z
ocn
x
>
>
O
0
W
� �
W
J
a`
J O J N
r m
N U -t
N p
m
O
O z 0
c C4 0 ° ° w LO
U U 2
3 �
o
z
CD m
a v
c v v o
o 0 U) a`
W �
t L
_ to ,n o rn w
a
L� m
vi O
C O
O O
m
�
a c
N O
Q me po ov
F Z Q co �o yap
Q U y
O o O U c U
O C
C _ 0.
i W Q G S .2 E N O N�
!Y J ¢ O O " D C w N N
W S w w e (D E! 0 0
Cn N - ° C, p K O N— U O Y
N c N
w 3 Q X S Z Q N C N C C O
w a w U 3 0
d O O I x E
N J J O U N U N O > U
Z p 1�.. S w J — N O` Q O N
Jm Y Z ~o U Q.L+ U O W
Z Z
Z D m m 3 w (V M
O Y
�sa
Q r�r���r<e a
CD
U)
cD f�aOmp
0000�
00000
zzzzz� °
00000��'
Q Q Q Q Q J .y. Iya•�j''''
% % % % %
W W W W W.rfihi -
J J J J J J - j WW1
W W W W W)
O✓ d
w w w w w�
0 0 0 0 o Y Q LLJ
� � of x � Q co
Z
O
U
Z
Y
O
,� N
(n
X
O
O
W
J
� LL-
LL)
lL.
U �
Z N
c O (n
fi X
Z
J 0
z U Y
O W Z
N_ � Q
m
FY U
O cn _
= O O U
C`J (Y _
ar
N O '` W
O O O o-) o� —I
N
('1J) NOUVA31� �
M
Z
� ZN Zz � J
� J 11
O�O(/7 Opp z= V) (14
0
O
N
O
N
�
H
C
E
N
�
vwi
cn
�n
N
L
N
p
N
T
T
O
�
O
>
>
O
O
(n
N
W
J

w'
Of
Q �
W
L�
F ~
Q Z Q
O 0
0 F— } Q .pi r�OYhl1i v� �cOryI� m N oNi, ANmy �Nvmyi .Yr--{O1 ih irytrV� .N+ .n�1i1 ryPN .O NNN ,h.yy ,V.{{ N sNla",-9444>-
y �vtmyVi n - MMN t�.41 4 4 }'
W > gi 01 Obi OI IP1 Clt N 01 O1 U1 W. El m m 61 a^S Ot 01 O� m a1 V. N a1 p1 N O1 Q
V) N
z
P0 Ho4��
Q d.rq°W^�YrvFJfilf�l`fVm a aS� a1t c &u1 LiL� in
H
U)
O
00
O
A
W
u
Z
Q
J
Q
Z
O
N_
E
O
= O
N
C _1
N
O
O
O O 0� co
O 1 CS
MR
ft
0 0 00
O O O 0 O —
00000
N N N N N Z
�� �� O
Z Z Z Z Z~
00000 j
H
H H H H W
Q Q Q Q< J
> > > > > w
W W W W LEI
J J J J J J
W LJ LJ W W J
D
W W W W W L�
C) 0 0 0 0 Y
Q< Q Q Q Z
D% 0' 0_ 0_ D: <
C7 O C7 0 0 m
r O
C) 6�
u
U/
X
N
O
N
O
O
O
N
® T
ccv
•
o
z
O
0
C
N O
/
°+J E
mCO
C
m
cy
N O
O
Lo
p
Z N Z Z
+0
� O 0
Z
O
J O
W O
C a
' VO
O�
` N
C C
O Q
0-
C
O
E
h N
vw
H
U O
to
I En
0 o
U
<.L.+
C�
O N
'p
`�5<
I •x
m O`
C-
C) p
p
in
o0
_E
O U
>
W-0
Z�F-
00 0
CL
U)
X
N
L
N
o
vi U)
M
E
a
3
®"
w�'
T
N
w LLJ
O m
WO UZ
N U)
�X
>
O
i
V
N
U
L�
J
w
a
LLl
w'
Of
Q �
W
L�
F ~
Q Z Q
O 0
0 F— } Q .pi r�OYhl1i v� �cOryI� m N oNi, ANmy �Nvmyi .Yr--{O1 ih irytrV� .N+ .n�1i1 ryPN .O NNN ,h.yy ,V.{{ N sNla",-9444>-
y �vtmyVi n - MMN t�.41 4 4 }'
W > gi 01 Obi OI IP1 Clt N 01 O1 U1 W. El m m 61 a^S Ot 01 O� m a1 V. N a1 p1 N O1 Q
V) N
z
P0 Ho4��
Q d.rq°W^�YrvFJfilf�l`fVm a aS� a1t c &u1 LiL� in
H
U)
O
00
O
A
W
u
Z
Q
J
Q
Z
O
N_
E
O
= O
N
C _1
N
O
O
O O 0� co
O 1 CS
MR
ft
0 0 00
O O O 0 O —
00000
N N N N N Z
�� �� O
Z Z Z Z Z~
00000 j
H
H H H H W
Q Q Q Q< J
> > > > > w
W W W W LEI
J J J J J J
W LJ LJ W W J
D
W W W W W L�
C) 0 0 0 0 Y
Q< Q Q Q Z
D% 0' 0_ 0_ D: <
C7 O C7 0 0 m
r O
C) 6�
u
U/
X
O < m
N N
O
m
O
O Z O
C 0
O D W to
v vi
6
z
00 m
ui aVi
c v v o
o L) rn a`
N
O
N
O
O
O
N
�
II
O
0
C
N O
N
mCO
C
m
cy
- p
O >
�Q)
U
w `
C a
' VO
O�
` N
C C
O Q
0-
C
O
E
h N
vw
H
U O
to
I En
0 o
U
<.L.+
C�
O N
'p
`�5<
I •x
m O`
C-
C) p
p
in
o0
_E
O U
>
W-0
O
V)
U)
X
N
O < m
N N
O
m
O
O Z O
C 0
O D W to
v vi
6
z
00 m
ui aVi
c v v o
o L) rn a`
F.
Pi
N
O
O
m
O
O
N
�
C
E
0-
C
L
LO
LLJ
:3
V)
V)
U)
X
N
L
N
o
E
a
3
p
T
T
�
c
O
>
>
O
i
V
N
V)
L�
J
F.
Pi

J O W N
J M
N U <
o
m
0
C) zz 00
c
o
tn Ln U U S
3 U
O
NT m U
v
% Y O 1-7
o v n a
W
D a v
Q N N
W O
N w
N O
C
N _O
a c
O N >.-
O
Q C z O
Q F- O, C D o O >
F- Z Q C ,O C Z N Q)
Q O p O� 'Ev �a
0
4 �� °O -O oc
W > g88 &�BV�SF���8888 a En o_ a
Q N-
� J ¢ r = O O N y
W Z d F- O F -0 C-
D O W w -
N N - O_ O o � O N N U O LY
N 3 w Q w v m 3 O O
V) D J o = U N O 0L
O y - U to O NO d > C
J m Y Z o I g Q U o w�
Z
Z � a m 3 w Z N M
O m
a
m
O O O O
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N Z
z z z z z~
O O O O O�
F- FPF- F =w
a Q a a a
> > > >> LLJ
LL) wwLLJ w
J J J J J J
W W W W W
W W W W W L, Q
Cl 0 0 0 0 Y
aaaaaz w
of ��a'� Q
Z
O
C�
Z
Y
C O
W O
J
M
X
O
�s.
n
r W
J
LL.
LL-
W
U �
Z M
U)
C O
X
Z x
Z U
O w
N V)
Of C/") Y
O U) Q
I C O p�
U �
- Z
Y
O
O
O s J
� - z
Q
N C m
C o 0 00 � C
LL
Li
('J�) N011'VA3]3 J
m
x
®
"40, � Z Z �a Ow
Z Z � J
� � � O U N oo U LA-
0
z W W
o ,oN o� (/7�
pW�N mod' pS V) r4)
N o �� V) W-
N
O
O
v
O
O
N
�
�
C
L
�'
X
N
(n
In
N
W
o =o
ON
�
R
c
d'
•o
W U Z
Q'
�' X
�
O
�
O
T
T
W
U
>
>
U
O
�
a
F
J O W N
J M
N U <
o
m
0
C) zz 00
c
o
tn Ln U U S
3 U
O
NT m U
v
% Y O 1-7
o v n a
W
D a v
Q N N
W O
N w
N O
C
N _O
a c
O N >.-
O
Q C z O
Q F- O, C D o O >
F- Z Q C ,O C Z N Q)
Q O p O� 'Ev �a
0
4 �� °O -O oc
W > g88 &�BV�SF���8888 a En o_ a
Q N-
� J ¢ r = O O N y
W Z d F- O F -0 C-
D O W w -
N N - O_ O o � O N N U O LY
N 3 w Q w v m 3 O O
V) D J o = U N O 0L
O y - U to O NO d > C
J m Y Z o I g Q U o w�
Z
Z � a m 3 w Z N M
O m
a
m
O O O O
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N Z
z z z z z~
O O O O O�
F- FPF- F =w
a Q a a a
> > > >> LLJ
LL) wwLLJ w
J J J J J J
W W W W W
W W W W W L, Q
Cl 0 0 0 0 Y
aaaaaz w
of ��a'� Q
Z
O
C�
Z
Y
C O
W O
J
M
X
O
�s.
n
r W
J
LL.
LL-
W
U �
Z M
U)
C O
X
Z x
Z U
O w
N V)
Of C/") Y
O U) Q
I C O p�
U �
- Z
Y
O
O
O s J
� - z
Q
N C m
C o 0 00 � C
LL
Li
('J�) N011'VA3]3 J
m
x
®
"40, � Z Z �a Ow
Z Z � J
� � � O U N oo U LA-
0
z W W
o ,oN o� (/7�
pW�N mod' pS V) r4)
N o �� V) W-
N
O
O
v
O
O
N
�
�
C
L
�'
X
N
(n
In
N
N
O
N
O
�
O
T
T
O
�
C
O
>
>
U
O
(n
N
L�
J

W
IY
D .5
F- n
Q �
W
Li
N
O
O
O
Q
~Q
Z
O
®
Mir
E
z
V
O
Q
0
O
✓s
�
2
N
0Q W
O
Z ZZ
o
p va
Z
O
WO
U
O
0_
m < m
cZ
(O
W
U —
C O
r
Z Z
N v
N d
w
(n 0
<
Yo
w
a) w
U
�p
� ON
O o
Z
d't 0S
(n (D
U
D
(J
c
®�
w
U)
LLJ
Q
CL O
Uz
O x
�
co
O
Z
_
O
0
m
X
O
�,
U
02
�j L
V
fn
�O
U
OC)
W
i—
U
U v
a`
W
n
:1
W
IY
D .5
F- n
Q �
W
Li
Z
O c
Q m jCi4'i°H�4N�mo4 'i g o I S`'°
H
O
m
(-D
cO
A
W
U
Z
� O
(n
J
Q
F—
Z
O
N_
E
O O
= N
0
(N
O
0000
0 coo 0
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
0 0 0 0 0
H H F-
< Q Q Q Q J
J > > > J W
W W W W W
J J J J J J
W W W W W)
D
W W W W W L�
0 cl 0 0 0 Y
Q Q Q Q Q Z
()� Er Q� 0� Q
N
O
O
O
Q
~Q
Z
O
U)
Vl
V
O
Q
0
O
U
2
C
C) O
OICO
]
p
O >
0_
m < m
cZ
(O
W
U —
C O
r
w
>����......m����
������ ���
x x
(n 0
<
o
w
a) w
U
U a
3
U�
—
U
D
(J
c
.00
--
..
U)
O
U, L
>
C
O
Z
_
O
0
m
X
O
Z
O c
Q m jCi4'i°H�4N�mo4 'i g o I S`'°
H
O
m
(-D
cO
A
W
U
Z
� O
(n
J
Q
F—
Z
O
N_
E
O O
= N
0
(N
O
0000
0 coo 0
N N N N N Z
Z Z Z Z Z~
0 0 0 0 0
H H F-
< Q Q Q Q J
J > > > J W
W W W W W
J J J J J J
W W W W W)
D
W W W W W L�
0 cl 0 0 0 Y
Q Q Q Q Q Z
()� Er Q� 0� Q
('1J) NOUVA3T3
N
O
O
O
N
U
N
O
U)
Vl
V
O
L.
F
II
U
2
C
C) O
OICO
C
0.0
p
O >
0_
C
cZ
(O
W
U —
C O
y
O
O O C� 00 F �9
('1J) NOUVA3T3
1 1
N
O
O
O
N
U
N
O
U)
Vl
V
O
F
II
U
2
C
C) O
OICO
C
0.0
p
O >
0_
C
cZ
(O
W
U —
C O
y
U)
v)
U
x x
(n 0
o
m �
a) w
U
U a
3
U�
—
U
E
(J
c
.00
--
..
U)
O
U, L
>
C
O
Z
_
O
0
m
X
O
v
N
02
�j L
V
fn
�O
U
OC)
W
i—
—�
Q
U v
wn
O
n
:1
U
N
d
1 1
N
O
N
U
N
C9
Vl
V
O
r
U
O
C
E
O
0_
C
L
(O
W
7
U
U)
v)
cn
x x
W
S
U
U
3
U
0
E
N
°
..
T
H
c
O
>
>
O
Z
_
O
0
m
U
O
v
N
Lt
J
Y
U
n
:1
U
N
d
1 1
N
O
O
N
C9
O
N
�
C
E
0_
C
L
(O
W
7
U
U)
v)
cn
x x
N
0
0
E
°
T
T
H
c
O
>
>
_
O
7
7
U
O
V)
N
Lt
J
1 1

W
Of
o a
Q w n
W
W
Z
O
Vf O �D �O pp �O V1 m N Q n C O Ol Q n M m O
Q n oo m co ao 00 co n °0 w n
> Q1 01 O1 Q� O1 01 O 01 Q1 O 01 � Q1 01 O Q1 01 N 01 � Ot
W
J
W
oyo �n �o w .+
Q o ni o n m .n ry to o M m iry n m m m n v m v co
o w o
Q �°.° r-- --� ry N `" - `� ry - rv- `o n N N m N w m o 0
N N N N N N N N
O (n
}
W
> W d'
W
W
Z
O
ao N .. m m O1 n N oo a umi o �o 0o a �o N
Q of ou o0 00 00 ao 00 0o eo oo n ao 00 0o ao 0o co
>
W
J
W
Z
N �O a a N O a0 V w O w m O ri � N N O
O N N M M M C VI n O O O 00 W
O
N
O
O
rIq
O
co
N
0
QD
N
0
w
0
N
N
O
O
N
W O
U 00
Z
Q
f—
O
O (-D
J
Q
� 0
Z
O
NFr-
o
o
S N
O
O
O
�t
O
N
O
rl) N O
( l�) NOUVA313
a
H
Q
O
}
Q
(n
lD h 00 61 O
0000
O O O O O
O
z z z z z~
O O O O O j
w
Q Q Q Q¢ �
> > > > > w
W W W W W
J J J J J J
W W W W W J
D
W W W W W W
O O O O O Y
aaaaaz
[if Qf Q� 0� Q�a
00000m
i
I
I
I
0
0
v
0
E
M
u
0
v
Ln
-x-
o O
� O
a) _O
N
a) II
o_ c
>0 o
>
c p
Mc 0+,0 O >
c — U1
U� 0 N
N
p c0 U
O C C_
O d
C
O N w N
N O O y 0 0
p U 0 Y
C
m
0 0 I x o
U U N > U
N _ O Q c
H y Qr U v wn
O
Z N M
�
N
J
a
N
U
O
C
_y
-"n Q
0
0
m
o
O
z
o
�'E
/x
�
O
Q0 Qw
ZN �?
(DO ��
�_C
_ J
WQW
E
0
0
L
F—i g
7
U
(n
U)
N
NQZ
X
N
0
z
m
�'
N
ZZ�_�
O a-
ov
O 'It p 2
cn <
o
v
E
O
o
0
vi
a
O
�
o
O (n
>
v
o
0
ju
a
W
Of
o a
Q w n
W
W
Z
O
Vf O �D �O pp �O V1 m N Q n C O Ol Q n M m O
Q n oo m co ao 00 co n °0 w n
> Q1 01 O1 Q� O1 01 O 01 Q1 O 01 � Q1 01 O Q1 01 N 01 � Ot
W
J
W
oyo �n �o w .+
Q o ni o n m .n ry to o M m iry n m m m n v m v co
o w o
Q �°.° r-- --� ry N `" - `� ry - rv- `o n N N m N w m o 0
N N N N N N N N
O (n
}
W
> W d'
W
W
Z
O
ao N .. m m O1 n N oo a umi o �o 0o a �o N
Q of ou o0 00 00 ao 00 0o eo oo n ao 00 0o ao 0o co
>
W
J
W
Z
N �O a a N O a0 V w O w m O ri � N N O
O N N M M M C VI n O O O 00 W
O
N
O
O
rIq
O
co
N
0
QD
N
0
w
0
N
N
O
O
N
W O
U 00
Z
Q
f—
O
O (-D
J
Q
� 0
Z
O
NFr-
o
o
S N
O
O
O
�t
O
N
O
rl) N O
( l�) NOUVA313
a
H
Q
O
}
Q
(n
lD h 00 61 O
0000
O O O O O
O
z z z z z~
O O O O O j
w
Q Q Q Q¢ �
> > > > > w
W W W W W
J J J J J J
W W W W W J
D
W W W W W W
O O O O O Y
aaaaaz
[if Qf Q� 0� Q�a
00000m
i
I
I
I
0
0
v
0
E
M
u
0
v
Ln
-x-
o O
� O
a) _O
N
a) II
o_ c
>0 o
>
c p
Mc 0+,0 O >
c — U1
U� 0 N
N
p c0 U
O C C_
O d
C
O N w N
N O O y 0 0
p U 0 Y
C
m
0 0 I x o
U U N > U
N _ O Q c
H y Qr U v wn
O
Z N M
�
N
J
a
N
U
O
U
O
m
o
O
z
o
N
�
3
0
E
0
0
L
U
7
U
(n
U)
N
N
X
N
0
z
m
m
N
a''
o
v
E
O
o
0
vi
a
W
N
• .
1�
G
N
O
O
N
�
�-
c
E
d
C
L
W
7
U
(n
U)
N
N
X
N
L
N
a''
o
E
O
0
T
T
O
�
C
O
>
>
v
o
0
W
N
• .
1�
G

® 0 Z
T (� }} 0
� V J . N Z Z Z Z 0 W
E N x O U N 00 U C) W
j�" zZ�� a)0 �U v �Z
O :2 c Na0=
LLJ C)
Lev c o W � Z 6 U x
Q a p
N
O
N
N
O
O
N
O
00
O
W
O
Z O
U7
J O
Q N
Z
O
N O
F O
O
O
00
O
<O
O
If
C--)
cv
O
r> N O
O O O O O oo�
(•l-J) NOUVA3 �
l0 (�0001p
0000
00003
N N N N N Z
O'I
Z z z z Z~
0 0 0 0 0 <'
�i= F-- F7-( -w
Q Q Q Q Q J
> > > > > w
wwWwW
J J J J J J
w W w W W J
D
W W W W W W
0 0 0 0 0 Y
QQaaaz
���� [if a
00000m
w
m
a
`o
X
d
E
0
a
N
W
O
N
C
y
O
O
O
J
M
a�
N
�c
�
�
N vl
c
0,0
C
N O
>
v
O >
�
'C O
.2(o)
+ —
O
W'
O
to N
_0
Nw
U v
n
rn
(�C
o
U v
v-
rn �
c0
m3
00
I U
1LCZ�ilJlll a y
NE
•x
n O
20-
O
U v
of
"t
> U
C
w-0
N
�
Q
x
o
N
(n
w
2
U
3
O
U
Q
W
..
a
E
O
z
0
m
m
>
T
°
c
o
ti
l�
N
Y
OV
`O
U
o
U
n
a
Z
O
Q
�
N
01 W
M
N
ti W
�
Q
n M
O
I;
Oi
m N O'1
m � �
O O
W
J
W
Z
Q
O
M
o M
Q N
o
N H
-11
W O
ti
v
O
v
- -
- . o
.
0 0
0
N.. n
Q
Q
y
y
e'C-1
N
--I
-
-
N N
O
0
(n
W
J
Z)
N
�
D
Q
'a
Q
�cc
G
N
W
w
Z
O
Q
>
Ot
01
p
1�
•Q-I
.TY
VI
Q
W
J
W
'
Z
O°�
o .M-1
�i e
N
m
n
^. m
°i
o
a
n
Q
,i .�-�
.^-i W
O
N N
N
M rail Q
Q N n
N n
W W GO
6 Oo
O
N
I
N
O
N
N
O
O
N
O
00
O
W
O
Z O
U7
J O
Q N
Z
O
N O
F O
O
O
00
O
<O
O
If
C--)
cv
O
r> N O
O O O O O oo�
(•l-J) NOUVA3 �
l0 (�0001p
0000
00003
N N N N N Z
O'I
Z z z z Z~
0 0 0 0 0 <'
�i= F-- F7-( -w
Q Q Q Q Q J
> > > > > w
wwWwW
J J J J J J
w W w W W J
D
W W W W W W
0 0 0 0 0 Y
QQaaaz
���� [if a
00000m
w
m
a
`o
X
d
E
0
a
N
J
O
N
C
y
O
O
O
J
M
a�
N
�c
�
�
N vl
c
0,0
C
N O
>
v
O >
UU
O
(n U
'C O
.2(o)
+ —
O
C C_
0.
a
O
to N
_0
Nw
U v
n
rn
(�C
o
U v
v-
rn �
c0
m3
00
I U
1LCZ�ilJlll a y
NE
•x
n O
20-
O
U v
of
"t
> U
C
w-0
N
�
J
N
O
J
M
a�
N
tn
Q
O
C.�
T
U
O
m
O
O
Z
O
F--
C
E
x
N
N
(n
w
2
U
3
O
U
N
..
a
E
O
z
0
m
m
>
T
°
c
o
ti
v
N
Y
OV
`O
U
o
U
n
a
1 1
Md
O
O
a�
C.�
O
N
�
F--
C
E
x
N
N
(n
a
E
0
3
v
>
T
°
c
o
>
>
�
�
U
(n
(n
J
1 1
Md

O O W N
J
K O U
N n O
w� � � .j-y rfo � N .o O � r 0 � N 0O •7 C � C cC y 7 CC
i� I t 9t I
O Z
�
l m � • Ii . �
'
Q » I y
I I
d IL
L(� fZ O J �_ J Q z Z -
L_
J J i I U
p J J
ti
=IQ � z _D 0 ` Q i
_ D OO O
W o z
J o z O � C
Q FN O O o � o Q I I
l
p = O Q
Li zu
0 OpN O O p lqt 2 Q U
O p 0 O F-
Ld 0 Z
Z w � O m
W n L a
't r7 N O
O O O m p r- co Ln d N O O)
O 13314$ SIH1 33S 3NnH31VY O m 00
O O _ r _
ol
0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0
00 00
GO
fl O S 2= S S W W LJ W 2 N
W CD W
O Q Q Q Q
- O O O O O W
N 00 F- UQ
> > > >>
W W W W W O W H W
Z m o J �
J J
N co W W W W W Iz W
C� O O O O Y-
0 2 2 S L- Z
C � C � O 0 CD Q Q
00 (3 0 0 0 F K E E 3: m
0 O
00 W 00
bi
Q J O 0
O O
O O
O (7 O �
� N
O 00 o N o
o 0 N fl W a U LLJ
O O Q
LLJ cn L
. U) J LO O
w a Y n
O J 0
LLJ
O O O O CO
O N O O O 0 �D m 00 0 Ln Y 0
Ln 0
CD
Ln
O O Ln O O O Go
LO r
Lli QO O O m Q 0
CD O o
OD
CD O
O m 00 n CO
m 0) 0) 0) O r7 133HS SIM 33S 3NnHOlYA
.
f
I
LI
Il
I'
L
II
r�.
,l
I I
I L
r I
I I
1
L;
A)1
I)
it
�r r
1
it rJ,l
r;
F=
O O W N
J
K O U
N n O
w� � � .j-y rfo � N .o O � r 0 � N 0O •7 C � C cC y 7 CC
i� I t 9t I
O Z
�
l m � • Ii . �
'
Q » I y
I I
d IL
L(� fZ O J �_ J Q z Z -
L_
J J i I U
p J J
ti
=IQ � z _D 0 ` Q i
_ D OO O
W o z
J o z O � C
Q FN O O o � o Q I I
l
p = O Q
Li zu
0 OpN O O p lqt 2 Q U
O p 0 O F-
Ld 0 Z
Z w � O m
W n L a
't r7 N O
O O O m p r- co Ln d N O O)
O 13314$ SIH1 33S 3NnH31VY O m 00
O O _ r _
ol
0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0
00 00
GO
fl O S 2= S S W W LJ W 2 N
W CD W
O Q Q Q Q
- O O O O O W
N 00 F- UQ
> > > >>
W W W W W O W H W
Z m o J �
J J
N co W W W W W Iz W
C� O O O O Y-
0 2 2 S L- Z
C � C � O 0 CD Q Q
00 (3 0 0 0 F K E E 3: m
0 O
00 W 00
bi
Q J O 0
O O
O O
O (7 O �
� N
O 00 o N o
o 0 N fl W a U LLJ
O O Q
LLJ cn L
. U) J LO O
w a Y n
O J 0
LLJ
O O O O CO
O N O O O 0 �D m 00 0 Ln Y 0
Ln 0
CD
Ln
O O Ln O O O Go
LO r
Lli QO O O m Q 0
CD O o
OD
CD O
O m 00 n CO
m 0) 0) 0) O r7 133HS SIM 33S 3NnHOlYA
.
f
I
LI
Il
I'
L
II
r�.
,l
I I
I L
r I
I I
1
L;
A)1
I)
it
�r r
1
it rJ,l
r;
I,
3
/y
r

McDonalds Pond Restoration Site: Longitudinal Profile Data (2010)
Station
TWG
WS
BKF
Station
TWG
WS
BKF
Station
TWG
WS
BKF
0.0
98.0
99.0
99.6
358.1
97.0
620.0
94.5
11.8
97.8
365.2
97.2
97.9
98.3
623.4
94.4
19.6
97.7
370.4
97.1
629.3
95.0
26.2
97.9
373.9
96.9
635.1
95.0
32.7
98.3
378.2
96.7
1
638.7
1 94.5
37.4
98.3
381.2
96.9
640.4
94.9
42.7
97.6
387.3
96.9
642.7
94.7
49.8
97.4
392.7
96.6
649.1
94.8
52.1
97.6
395.3
96.5
655.8
94.5
58.6
97.6
98.6
99.2
399.5
96.8
660.0
94.6
96.2
96.6
56.4
97.6
1 404.7
96.1
1
664.8
94.7
63.6
97.6
408.3
95.9
671.3
94.3
71.4
98.0
411.3
95.8
676.7
94.6
78.4
98.3
413.0
95.8
97.0
97.4
680.2
94.4
84.5
98.0
413.7
95.9
686.7
95.0
93.3
97.7
418.2
96.3
690.5
94.1
99.8
97.8
1 421.1
95.8
1
699.8
94.0
107.6
98.4
428.0
95.7
705.1
94.6
112.2
98.1
433.1
95.9
711.3
94.5
116.2
97.4
437.1
96.3
716.0
94.5
121.3
97.5
440.0
96.1
719.9
94.4
126.8
97.9
446.6
96.2
724.0
94.9
129.0
97.7
98.3
98.8
1 450.6
96.6
733.2
93.9
134.1
97.6
456.3
96.3
740.6
94.5
142.7
97.6
462.0
96.6
747.1
94.4
150.9
98.1
464.4
95.7
753.6
94.4
161.2
97.3
469.3
95.8
757.0
94.6
172.0
98.0
473.7
95.9
762.9
94.8
179.6
97.9
479.9
95.8
769.0
94.7
185.4
97.3
98.4
98.7
485.6
95.8
775.3
94.0
190.9
98.0
491.0
95.4
94.4
97.0
780.9
94.5
202.0
98.0
492.1
95.1
785.6
94.6
212.1
98.0
496.7
95.2
790.9
94.8
221.2
97.8
502.4
95.5
797.1
94.2
228.5
97.7
505.6
95.8
803.1
94.7
239.2
98.0
509.8
95.1
810.0
94.8
95.6
95.9
246.5
97.4
511.3
95.3
808.8
95.0
248.0
97.5
98.1
98.5
515.0
95.1
96.5
97.1
815.3
94.8
253.1
97.7
518.8
95.2
1
822.2
94.6
258.2
96.4
525.8
95.3
826.8
94.3
262.6
95.6
532.7
95.4
834.1
93.7
267.0
96.1
537.8
95.5
839.3
94.6
280.7
96.6
543.8
95.0
843.0
94.6
283.3
97.2
1
551.1
95.4
847.4 1
93.9
285.6
97.6
557.7
95.2
851.9
94.3
293.8
97.6
565.2
95.6
857.8
94.0
298.3
97.5
571.6
95.6
862.2
93.9
303.2
97.3
579.1
95.4
867.3
94.1
307.9
97.1
586.1
95.3
869.8
93.8
312.8
96.8
1
592.9
95.3
874.8
93.9
328.7
96.6
597.2
94.4
880.1
93.9
334.1
96.6
600.3
94.6
339.2
97.2
603.9
95.0
Units =Feet
TWG = Thalweg
WS =Water Surface
342.6
97.1
607.9
95.2
346.1
97.2 1
610.9
94.9
1
351.8
97.4
615.1 1
94.9
BKF = Bankfull
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
B -1

EEP Project No. D04020 -2
APPENDIX C: AQUATIC COMMUNITY DATA
C
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

SPECIES
T.V.
F.F.G.
Reach 1
(Reference)
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
(Reference)
ANNELIDA
Oli ochaeta
CG
Tubificida
Naididae
6.1
CG
2
Nais s .
8.9
CG
2
Pnstina leid i
9.6
CG
I
Tubtficidae w.o.h.c.
9.5
CG
1
Lumbriculida
Lumbriculidae
7
CG
1
ARTHROPODA
Arachnoidea
Acariformes
I
Crustacea
Cladocera
Ch doridae
1
Iso oda
Asellidae
SH
Caecidotea s .
9.1
CG
1
Deca oda
Cambaridae
7.5
1
1
Insecta
E hemero tera
Baetidae
6.1
CG
1
1
Acer enna pygmaea
3.7
1
Plauditus s .
4.5
CG
1
Pseudocloeon s .
CG
2
2
Macca ertium (Stenonema) s .
3.5
SC
7
14
8
9
Parale to hlebia s.
0.9
CG
2
2
3
1
Odonata
Bo eria vinosa
6
P
13
6
5
20
Calo to x s.
7.8
P
5
2
18
7
Ar to s .
8.2
P
7
2
Cordulegaster s .
5.7
P
2
4
Gom hidae
5
P
Dromo om hus s inosus
5.9
P
1
1
4
Gont hus s .
5.8
P
9
2
15
Ha genius brevislylus
4
P
3
Pro om hus obscurus
8.2
P
3
1
Ltbellulidae
6.7
P
1
Macromia s .
6.2
P
1
Macromia illinoensis
1
Neurocordulia s .
5
2
10
14
3
Neurocordulia vir intensis
5
1
1
Pleco tera
Leuctridae
0.2
SH
Leuctra s .
0.7
SH
12
16
26
27
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
C -1

SPECIES
T.V.
F.F.G.
Reach 1
(Reference)
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
(Reference)
Acroneuria s .
1.5
P
7
2
Perlesta s .
4.7
P
1
1
Perlinella s .
0.6
P
1
Hemi tera
Ne idae
Ranatra s .
7.8
P
1
Vehidae
6
P
Rha ovelta obesa
6
P
1
1
Me alo tera
Corydalidae
6.5
P
Ni ronia serricornes
5.3
P
6
4
1
2
Sialidae
P
Sialis s .
7.2
P
1
Tricho tera
H dro s chidae
4
FC
Cheumato s the s .
6.2
FC
2
1
Diplectrona modesta
2.2
FC
10
1
23
H dro s the s .
4.3
FC
6
14
48
1
H dro tilidae
4
PI
Oxyethira s .
2.2
PI
I
Le tocendae
2.7
CG
Oecetis s .
4.7
P
4
Odontocendae
SC
Psilotreta s.
0
SC
3
3
1
Philo otamidae
FC
Chimarra s .
2.8
FC
1 6
1
Coleo tera
Elmidae
6
CG
Aneyronyx variegata
6.5
SC
3
5
1
Promoresia ele ans
2.4
SC
1
1
1
Stenebnis s .
5.1
SC
8
1
Sta h linidae
8
P
1
Di tera
Chironomidae
Ablabesm is mallochi
7.2
P
1
Ablabestn is rhamphe g .
7.2
P
1
Apsectrotanypusjohnsoni
0.1
2
2
3
Concha elo is s.
4.5
P
8
3
15
4
Corynoneura s .
6
CG 1
2
Cricoto us btcinctus
I
Cry tochironomus s .
6.4
P
1
Mierotendi es pedellus gp.
5.5
CG
1
1
Parachaetocladius s .
0
CG
1
Paramerina s .
4.3
P
1
Parametriocnemus s .
3.7
CG
• 8
Pol edilum avum (convictum)
5.7 1
SH
1
2
6
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
C -2

Polypedilum ilhnoense
5.7
SH
1
SPECIES
T.V.
F.F.G.
Reach 1
(Reference)
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
(Reference)
Psectrocladius s .
3.6
SH
7
Rheocricoto us tuberculatus
7.3
CG
2
Rheostnittia arcuota
7
1
Rheotan tarsus exiguus gp.
5.9
1
1
8
Tan tarsus s .
6.8
FC
1
Thienemanniella s .
5.9
1
Thienemanniella xena
5.9
CG
1
Tvetenia paucunca
3.7
CG
1
1
Simuliidae
3.5
FC
Simulium Sp.
4
FC
2
4
Ti ulidae
4.9
SH
Hexatoma s .
4.3
P
1
Ti ula s .
7.3
SH
1
I
TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
153
100
199
134
TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
42
27
38
26
EPT
10
11
10
8
BIOTIC INDEX
4.54
4.03
4.51
4.07
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
C -3

APPENDIX D: NCDWQ HABITAT ASSESSMENT FORM - COASTAL PLAIN
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

Y
This Page Left Blank Intentionally

3/06 Revision 7
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Coastal Plain Streams
OTALSCORE
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ
Duecnons for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right -of -way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Stream —Location/road. (Road Name )County
Date CC# Basin Subbasin
Observer(s) Type of Study: ❑ Fish ❑Benthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude Longitude ___________ Ecoregion: ❑ CA ❑ SWP ❑ Sandhills ❑ CB
Water Quality: Temperature °C DO mg /I Conductivity (corr.) pS /cm pH
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location. Check off what
you observe driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use %Forest %Residenhal %Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use ❑ Foiest ❑ Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream Channel (at top of bank) Stream Depth- (m) Avg........ Max
❑ Width variable ❑Braided channel ❑Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of channel to top of bank)- (m)__
Flow conditions ❑High ❑Normal ❑Low
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A Water reaches base ofboth banks, minimal channel substrate exposed .... ....... ... ... ❑
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ ❑
C. Water fills 25 -75% of available channel, many logs /snags exposed ................. ... ............ ❑
D Root mats out of water ........... .... .... ........ ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools .................. ............................... ❑
Turbidity: ❑Clear ❑ Slightly Twbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes) ❑Green tinge
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project ?? ❑ YES ❑ NO
Details
❑Channelized ditch
❑Deeply incised- steep, straight banks El Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Sewage smell
❑Excessive periphyton growth ❑Heavy filamentous algae growth
Manmade Stabilization: ON ❑Y• ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade- control structure ❑Berm/levee
Weather Conditions: Photos: ON ❑Y ❑Digital 035mm
TYPICAL STREAM CROSS SECTION DIAGRAM ON BACK
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
D -1

I. Channel Modification
Score
A. Natural channel - minimal dredging .................. ..... .. ... ............................... 15
B. Some channelization near bridge, or historic ( >20 year old), and/or bends beginning to reappear.. 10
C. Extensive channelization, straight as far as can see, channelized ditch... . .. . ....... 5
D Banks shored with hard structure, >80% of reach disrupted, mstream habitat gone....... 0
Remarks Subtotal
IL Instream Habitat: Consider the peicentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >50% of the
reach is snags, and 1 type is present, circle the score of 16. Definition. leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and
have begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare. Common, or Abundant.
_Sticks _Snags /logs _Undercut banks or root mats _Macrophytes
_Leafpacks
1. gravel dominant . ............................... ........................................
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION
OR COVER
........... 13
>50% 30 -50%
10 -30%
<10%
Score Score
Score
Score
4 or 5 types present ............... 20 15
10
5
3 types present ....................... 18 13
8
4
2 types present . 17 12
7
3
1 type present ......... ......... 16 11
6
2
No substrate for benthos colonization and no fish cover . .
..... .................
0
❑ No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal
Ili. Bottom Substrate (silt, clay, sand, dehihis, gravel) look at entire reach for substrate scoring
A. Substrate types mixed
Score
1. gravel dominant . ............................... ........................................
............................... 15
2. sand dominant
........... 13
3. dehitus dominant ......................... ....... ..............................
... .................... 7
4. silt/clay /muck dominant .............................. I . ...........
......... .. ........................... 4
B. Substrate homogeneous
6
1. nearly all gravel .. ............................... ..........................
....... ............................... 12
2 nearly all sand ...........
. . ...................... 7
3 nearly all detritus .................. ......
............. 4
4. nearly all silt/clay/ muck .................... ...............................
... ............................... 1
Remarks
Suhinral
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow.
A. Pools present
Score
I Pools Frequent ( >30% of 100m length surveyed)
avanety of pool sizes ..................................................................... ...............................
10
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in) ..... ...............................
.. ..... 8
2. Pools Infrequent ( <30% of the l 00m length surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ..... ............................... . ..................... ...............................
6
b. pools about the same size ................ .. ..... ... .... . ..............
... ..... 4
B. Pools absent
1. Deep water /run habitat present ..................... ............................... .........................
. ................ 4
2 Deep water /run habitat absent. ... ............ .................. . ..........................
0
Subtotal
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
D -2
Page Total
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

V. Bank Stability and Vegetation
Score
Score
A. Banks stable or no banks, just flood plain
Score
Score
1. little or no evidence of erosion or bank failure, little potential for erosion .........
10
10
B. Erosion areas present
_ ................ 5
5
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems... ...............
9
9
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ..............
7
7
3 sparse vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding .................
4
4
4. mostly grasses, few if any Kees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high now
2
2
5 little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident. .... .........0
0
a. zone width > 18 meters ......... ........
I ....... ........ 4
Total
Remarks
VI. Light Penetration (Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's smface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead)
Score
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ...... ............................... 8
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal .............................. 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ........................... ...... 2
E No canopy and no shading ............................ .................. 0
Subtotal__
Remarks
VII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: A break in the riparian zone is any area which allows sediment to enter the stream. Bieaks refer to the near - stream portion
of the riparian zone (banks); places where pollutants can directly enter the stream.
Remarks
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
D -3
Page Total
TOTAL SCORE
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
Lft. Bank
Rt. Batik
Score
Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. zone width > 18 meters ..... ... ....... ... ...
_ ................ 5
5
2. zone width 12 -18 meters ........................... . ..... ..........................
... 4
4
3. zone width 6 -12 meters ................................................. ...............................
3
3
4 zone width < 6 meters
2
2
B Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. zone width > 18 meters ......... ........
I ....... ........ 4
4
b. zone width 12 -18 meters.. ... ........... .............................
3
3
c zone width 6 -12 meters ................... ...............................
2
2
d zone width < 6 meters.. ...............
l
I
2. breaks common
a zone width > 18 meters ...... ....... ...............................
3
3
b. zone width 12 -18 meteis ............ ...............................
... 2
2
c. zone width 6 -12 meters . ......................... ...............................
1
1
d zone width < 6 meters
0
0
Total
Remarks
EEP Project No. D04020 -2
D -3
Page Total
TOTAL SCORE
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

EEP Project No. D04020 -2
Typical Stream Cross - section
Fxlreme High Water
Normal High Water
Normal Flow
.�
Stream Width
D -4
This side is 45° bank angle.
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site

APPENDIX E: VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
E

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

5a
G
:1
C
O
c�
bq
C
O
f�
C
O
N
bq
I
M
O
G
O
L
21
C
O
r
N
bA
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
E -1

0
a
0
bn
N
L
O
a
0
.i
a�
on
m
0
a
0
an
0
O
a
c
0
a�
bn
i
EEP Project No. D04020 -2 McDonalds Pond Restoration Site
E -2

r.
McDonalds Pond Restoration Site Vegetation Monitoring Summary Data
2006 - Year 1 Monitoring
Species
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 8
Chamaecyparis thyoides
4
4
3
2
2
7
7
4
Liriodendron tulipifera
2
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
Magnolia virginiana
0
6
3
0
0
1
0
0
Nyssa biflora
4
6
3
6
0
2
6
2
Persea borbonia
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
0
1
0
Pinus taeda
1
2
0
3
0
0
0
6
Pinus serotina
3
3
4
1
9
2
3
7
TOTAL
14
21
14
12
11
14
17
20
DENSITY (trees /acre)
567
850
567
486
445
567
688
809
2007 - Year 2 Monitorin
Species
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 8
Chamaecy aris thyoides
4
4
2
2
2
7
7
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
Magnolia vt . rg i niana
0
6
3
0
0
1
1
0
Nyssa biflora
4
5
3
6
0
2
6
2
Persea borbonia
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
0
1
0
Pinus taeda
1
2
0
3
0
0
0
6
Pinus serotina
4
3
4
1
8
2
3
5
TOTAL
13
20
13
12
10
14
18
16
DENSITY (trees /acre)
526
809
526
486
405
567
728
647
2008 - Year 3 Monitoring
Species
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 8
Chamaecyparis thyoides
3
5
3
2
2
6
7
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Magnolia virginiana
0
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
Nyssa biflora
4
7
4
6
0
2
5
2
Persea borbonia
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
0
0
1 0
Pinus taeda
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
Pinus serotina
6
3
3
7
7
5
1
4
TOTAL
14
16
14
15
10
14
13
10
DENSITY (trees /acre)
567
647
567
607
405
567
526
405
2009 - Year 4 Monitoring
Species
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 9*
Plot 10*
Chamaecyparis thyoides
4
3
2
2
6
6
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
Magnolia virginiana
1
3
0
0
1
0
3
3
Nyssa biflora
4
3
6
0
2
5
7
11
Persea borbonia
0
. 0
0
0 1
0
0
0 1
0
Pinus taeda
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Pinus serotina
3
3
7
7
5
1
0
0
TOTAL
12
13
15
10
14
12
16
17
DENSITY (trees /acre)
486
526
607
405
567
486
647
688
2010 - Year 5 Monitoring
Species
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 9*
Plot 10*
Chamaecy aris thyoides
2
3
2
2
6
5
2
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
Magnolia virginiana
1
3
0
0
0
0
3
3
Nyssa biflora
4
3
6
0
2
5
7
10
Persea borbonia
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pinus taeda
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pinus serotina
1
3
6
6
4
1
0
0
TOTAL
8
13
14
8
12
11
15
16
DENSITY (trees/acre)
324
526
567
324
486
445
607
647
*Plots 1 and 8 were replaced with new plots 9 and 10 following remedial work at the Site