20011102 Ver 1_NEPA Merger Process Application_20120206

�M David Wainwright
Transportation Permitting Unit Via — Div of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1650
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FFB ® 6
"2
gam, � 0 /2
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE Eu p ,�Jrq,R
GOVERNOR SEC zaww., •�+C/J�+
January 24 20128
Mr Tom Steffens
U S Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
Washington Regulatory Field Office
PO Box 1000
Washington NC 27889 1000
SUBJECT Section 404 — NEPA Merger Process Application for a Department of the Army
(DOA) Permit Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act TO DISCHARGE
DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES TO
CONSTRUCT the Proposed Improvements to Construct a Bypass of US 70 in
Havelock Craven County, from West of the Existing US 70 /SR 1760 (Hickman Hill
Loop Road) Intersection to Southeast of the US 70 /SR 1824 (McCotter Boulevard)
Intersection
NCDOT TIP No R 1015
The following application, including separate attachments for the ENG Form 4345 and mailing list
labels, is submitted for your consideration At this Juncture the Regulatory Division has provided
concurrence with Purpose and Need, and with the selection of Detailed Study Alternatives The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was prepared for this proposed action and approved by the
Federal Highway Administration on September 6 2011 The document was circulated between
September 9 2011 and October 3 2011
Please issue your Public Notice at the earliest opportunity so that we can jointly proceed toward
revisiting the LEDPA (least environmentally damaging practicable alternative which meets the purpose
and need of the project) decision following analysis of public input Once concurrence is reached on the
LEDPA efforts will be undertaken to further minimize Impacts to wetlands and riparian buffers In the
LEDPA corridor and to discuss compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable Impacts
The following Information Is a summary of relevant project details and Is being provided to assist In the
Section 404 regulatory review of the project Please note that more detailed Information Is available In
the DEIS
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTN ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699 1548
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
4Nl HS111 II IVII A1CD01 (OV
LOCATION
CENTURY CENTER BLDG A
1000 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610

k� }f
INTRODUCTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a bypass of
US 70 in Havelock Craven County from approximately one mile west of the existing US 70 /SR
1760 (Hickman Hill Loop Road) intersection to southeast of the US 70 /SR 1824 (McCotter
Boulevard) intersection The bypass is proposed to the west of existing US 70 Exhibit 1 is a
vicinity map Exhibit 2 provides a key for the Detailed Study Alternative maps and Exhibits 3a
3d show the Detailed Study Alternatives overlain with water resources mapping
The proposed US 70 Bypass is approximately 9 9 to 10 9 miles in length (depending upon
alternative) The bypass is proposed as a four -lane median divided full control of access
facility on new location The proposed right of way is a minimum 250 feet for all Build
Alternatives The proposed facility has a design speed of 70 miles per hour (mph)
PURPOSE AND NEED
The need for improvements to the US 70 corridor through the City of Havelock is based on the
following conditions
Continued commercial institutional and residential growth in the City of Havelock and the
increasing regional use of US 70 has led to a deterioration of traffic operations along
existing US 70 causing undesirable levels of traffic service The capacity of this route with
numerous existing signalized intersections is dominated by the operational characteristics
of the signalized intersections By the design year 2035 none of the mayor existing
signalized intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service without substantial
improvements
US 70 through the City of Havelock is designated to be upgraded to a freeway (Corridor
46) in the North Carolina Strategic Highway Corridors Plan The Strategic Highway
Corridors Plan identifies highway corridors that play a critical role in regional or statewide
mobility and seeks to protect and improve these routes in an effort to enhance
transportation economic development and environmental stewardship Increased traffic
demand has diminished the ability of US 70 between Morehead City and Raleigh to
function as envisioned in the Strategic Highway Corridors Plan
• The lack of access control with numerous street and driveway connections to the
adjacent development substantially reduces the mobility of this corridor Currently 14
traffic signals prohibit uninterrupted service along the existing corridor through Havelock
The US 70 corridor needs to be upgraded to meet the goals and long term visions of the
Strategic Highway Corridors Plan
The purpose of the proposed project is
To improve the traffic operations for regional and statewide traffic along the US 70
corridor
To enhance the ability of US 70 to serve the regional transportation function in
accordance with the Strategic Highway Corridors Plan

COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULE
Preliminary cost estimates for the Detailed Study Alternatives are presented in Table 1 below
Table 1
Preliminary Cost Estimates
The project is scheduled for right of -way to begin in fiscal year 2013 and construction to begin in
fiscal year 2015
ALTERNATIVES
No Build Alternative
Several intersections along existing US 70 through Havelock currently operate at an undesirable
level of service The No Build Alternative would allow traffic congestion to increase leading to a
greater breakdown of traffic service along this section of US 70 In addition the goals of the
project which include improving the level of service for local regional and statewide traffic along
the US 70 corridor and enhancing the ability of US 70 to serve the regional transportation
function in accordance with the Strategic Highway Corridors Plan would not be realized A No
Build Alternative is not consistent with adopted local regional and State transportation plans
The No Build Alternative does not meet the purpose and need for this project
Detailed Study Alternatives
Detailed Study Alternatives 1 2 and 3 are each new location corridors providing a controlled
access four -lane divided freeway Along each of the alternatives bridges are proposed to
cross over the Southwest Prong of Slocum Creek and the East Prong of Slocum Creek A
reinforced concrete box culvert is proposed at the crossing of a tributary of Tucker Creek The
Detailed Study Alternatives are described below
Detailed Study Alternative 1 shares a common corridor with Alternatives 2 and 3 at both ends
of the project At the southeastern terminus of the project all alternatives interchange with
existing US 70 southeast of SR 1824 (McCotter Boulevard) This location allows the bypass to
2
Study Corridor
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Length (miles)
1085
991
1031
Construction
$156 400 000
$138 800 000
$149 600 000
Utility Relocation
$1 600 000
$2 800 000
$2 800 000
Right of Way
$9 800 000
$29 000 000
$10 600 000
Total
$167,800,000
$170,600,000
$163,000,000
The project is scheduled for right of -way to begin in fiscal year 2013 and construction to begin in
fiscal year 2015
ALTERNATIVES
No Build Alternative
Several intersections along existing US 70 through Havelock currently operate at an undesirable
level of service The No Build Alternative would allow traffic congestion to increase leading to a
greater breakdown of traffic service along this section of US 70 In addition the goals of the
project which include improving the level of service for local regional and statewide traffic along
the US 70 corridor and enhancing the ability of US 70 to serve the regional transportation
function in accordance with the Strategic Highway Corridors Plan would not be realized A No
Build Alternative is not consistent with adopted local regional and State transportation plans
The No Build Alternative does not meet the purpose and need for this project
Detailed Study Alternatives
Detailed Study Alternatives 1 2 and 3 are each new location corridors providing a controlled
access four -lane divided freeway Along each of the alternatives bridges are proposed to
cross over the Southwest Prong of Slocum Creek and the East Prong of Slocum Creek A
reinforced concrete box culvert is proposed at the crossing of a tributary of Tucker Creek The
Detailed Study Alternatives are described below
Detailed Study Alternative 1 shares a common corridor with Alternatives 2 and 3 at both ends
of the project At the southeastern terminus of the project all alternatives interchange with
existing US 70 southeast of SR 1824 (McCotter Boulevard) This location allows the bypass to
2

J �
extend beyond the developed areas of Havelock and to shadow an existing cleared power
transmission line easement near existing US 70 It also avoids a large natural wetland area in
the Croatan National Forest to the south At the northwestern terminus of the project the
alternatives interchange with existing US 70 dust west of SR 1760 (Hickman Hill Loop Road)
This location allows this end of the bypass to extend beyond the developed areas of Havelock
with sufficient distance between the proposed interchange with existing US 70 and the North
Carolina Railroad so the bypass can be elevated to cross over the railroad The proposed
bypass crosses the upper reaches of Tucker Creek approximately 4 400 feet south of the North
Carolina Railroad Here the common corridor shared by Alternatives 1 2 and 3 turns east and
continues approximately 6 000 feet to a Croatan National Forest (CNF) access road
At the CNF access road Alternative 1 turns to the southwest Alternative 1 continues
southward along the western side of the CNF access road approximately 7 500 feet before
turning southeast and crossing the Southwest Prong of Slocum Creek approximately 1 400 feet
south of the southern end of SR 1791 (Pulley Road) After crossing the Southwest Prong of
Slocum Creek Alternative 1 continues approximately 5 000 feet southeastward to the
interchange with SR 1756 (Lake Road)
Alternative 1 includes a proposed interchange with SR 1756 (Lake Road) which is located
approximately 5 900 feet southwest of the Lake Road grade crossing of the North Carolina
Railroad From the proposed Lake Road interchange Alternative 1 continues southeastward
over a grade separation at the Camp Lejeune Railroad and along the south side of a cleared
power transmission line easement before crossing over the East Prong of Slocum Creek
Approximately 3 000 feet east of the East Prong of Slocum Creek Alternative 1 turns further
eastward to cross over the North Carolina Railroad and the power transmission line easement
Detailed Study Alternative 2 shares common alignment at the north end with Alternatives 1
and 3 Heading south Alternative 2 departs to its individual alignment near the CNF access
road and continues southeastward approximately 8 600 feet before crossing SR 1747 (Sunset
Drive) at a proposed grade separation Alternative 2 continues approximately 2 100 feet
southeastward crossing the Southwest Prong of Slocum Creek before crossing SR 1746 (Gray
Road) at another proposed grade separation Approximately 2 000 feet southeast of Gray Road
Alternative 2 crosses SR 1756 (Lake Road) at a proposed interchange The proposed
Alternative 2 interchange at Lake Road is located approximately 2 000 feet southwest of the
Lake Road grade crossing of the North Carolina Railroad After crossing SR 1756 (Lake Road)
Alternative 2 parallels the southern side of a cleared power transmission line easement for
approximately 7 000 feet before crossing the East Prong of Slocum Creek East of the creek
crossing Alternative 2 rejoins Alternatives 1 and 3 to continue southeastward to existing US 70
Detailed Study Alternative 3 turns southwest from Alternative 2 approximately 2 600 feet
southeast of the CNF access road crossing Alternative 3 continues along the eastern side of a
cleared power transmission line easement to a grade separation at SR 1747 (Sunset Drive)
Approximately 740 feet southeast of SR 1747 the corridor crosses over the Southwest Prong of
Slocum Creek Approximately 3 000 feet past the crossing of the Southwest Prong of Slocum
Creek Alternative 3 turns back to the southeast before rejoining Alternative 1 at the interchange
with SR 1756 (Lake Road)
9

i
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
The three project study corridors contain 25 streams and unnamed tributaries considered to be
jurisdictional surface waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act The majority of streams
delineated in the field are subject to Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules Based on field
investigations the project study corridors also contain 91 jurisdictional wetlands Tables 2 and 3
summarize areas of jurisdictional streams and wetlands located within each of the three bypass
alternatives The impacts are based on the 1 000 foot study corridor width for each alternative
Areas for National Forest System lands are presented separately Because the impacts shown
correspond to corridor widths actual impacts once final design is completed should be
considerably less
Table 2
Jurisdictional Impacts (Total within Project Study Area)
Table 3
Jurisdictional Impacts (National Forest System Lands only)
f
Study Corridor
Jurisdictional
Areas
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Wetlands
633 9 ac
473 5 ac
613 7 ac
(acres)
Streams
1 7 ac
1 8 ac
1 4 ac
(in acres)
Streams
12 764 If
16 822 if
10 271 If
(linear feet)
Table 3
Jurisdictional Impacts (National Forest System Lands only)
Streams
In comparing potential stream impacts for the Detailed Study Alternative corridors (1 000 foot
width) Alternative 1 has an estimated 12 764 linear feet of estimated potential stream impacts
Alternative 2 has an estimated 16 822 linear feet of estimated potential stream impacts and
Alternative 3 has an estimated 10 271 linear feet of estimated potential stream impacts
In
Study Corridor
Jurisdictional
Areas
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Wetlands
463 3 ac
396 1 ac
507 1 ac
(acres)
Streams
0 8 ac
1 3 ac
0 7 ac
(in acres)
Streams
5 906 If
10 897 If
5 714 If
(linear feet)
Streams
In comparing potential stream impacts for the Detailed Study Alternative corridors (1 000 foot
width) Alternative 1 has an estimated 12 764 linear feet of estimated potential stream impacts
Alternative 2 has an estimated 16 822 linear feet of estimated potential stream impacts and
Alternative 3 has an estimated 10 271 linear feet of estimated potential stream impacts
In

On NFS lands the Alternative 1 corridor has potential stream impacts of 5 906 linear feet
Alternative 2 has potential stream impacts of 10 897 linear feet and Alternative 3 has potential
stream impacts of 5 714 linear feet
Wetlands
Table 2 indicates potential wetland impacts for the Detailed Study Alternative corridors (1 000
foot width) In comparing potential impacts for the study corridor of each alternative Alternative
1 has 633 9 acres of potential wetland impact Alternative 2 has 473 5 acres of potential wetland
impact and Alternative 3 has 613 7 acres of potential wetland impact On NFS lands
Alternative 1 has 463 3 acres of potential wetland impacts Alternative 2 has 396 1 acres of
potential wetland impacts and Alternative 3 has 507 1 acres of potential wetland impacts
Floodplains
Encroachment on the 100 year floodplains of Tucker Creek the Southwest Prong of Slocum
Creek and the East Prong of Slocum Creek is required by each of the proposed bypass
alternatives Table 4 indicates the approximate area of 100 year floodplain encroachment at
each crossing based on a preliminary design right of way width The table also indicates the
reduction to anticipated floodplain impacts due to the bridges proposed at the Southwest Prong
of Slocum Creek and the East Prong of Slocum Creek
Table 4 (Right of Way Width)
Estimated 100 -Year Floodplain Encroachments (Acres)
Alt
Tucker Cr
Crossing
SW Prong
Crossing
E Prong
Crossing
Less Bridges
Total
1
12 05*
48 39*
41 33*
88
13
2
12 05*
32 32*
45 17*
75
14
3
12 05*
50 50*
41 33*
86
16
(Acres within Croatan National Forest)
The NCDOT Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the N C Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP)
to determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT s Memorandum of
Agreement or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final
Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)
MITIGATION EVALUATION
Mitigation has been defined in NEPA regulations to include efforts that a) avoid b) minimize c)
rectify d) reduce or eliminate or e) compensate for adverse impacts to the environment [40
CFR 1508 20 (a e)] Practicable alternative analysis must be fully evaluated before
compensatory mitigation can be discussed The purpose of compensatory mitigation is to
replace the lost functions and values from a projects impacts to Waters of the United States
5

Avoidance and Minimization
The preliminary design of each Detailed Study Alternative was developed to avoid wetland
impacts to the maximum extent practicable At locations where wetland impacts are likely the
preliminary design of each Detailed Study Alternative was developed to preserve the largest
amount of contiguous wetland area Bridges are proposed at the crossings of the Southwest
Prong of Slocum Creek and the East Prong of Slocum Creek for all Detailed Study Alternatives
Other Avoidance and Minimization Measures
Other avoidance and minimization measures will be discussed in detail during design of the
Preferred Alternative in consultation with the US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) and other
members of the interagency Merger Process Team The results of this discussion will be
documented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and as a condition of the
Section 404 Individual Permit
Compensatory Mitigation
The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) has purchased a 4 035 acre tract of
land approximately 3 6 miles northwest of Havelock in Craven County for the purpose of
developing a mitigation bank for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other environmental
impacts as a result of the proposed US 70 Havelock Bypass and other projects in the vicinity
The parcel is known as the Croatan Wetland Mitigation Bank (CWMB) and is contiguous to land
currently owned by the National Forest System
USACE NCDOT and the U S Forest Service have been planning the development use and
management of the CWMB This planning is directed toward conveyance of the CWMB property
to the U S Forest Service from NCDOT for inclusion in the Croatan National Forest According
to the Memorandum of Understanding between the U S Army Corps of Engineers the State of
North Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Forest Service the long
term management of the CWMB will include land uses and practices that are consistent with the
mitigation objectives of wetland restoration enhancement and preservation incorporating the
restoration of natural vegetation community structure This includes restoring hydrologic function
and sustaining aquatic systems restoration enhancement and providing red cockaded
woodpecker habitat linkage enhancing black bear habitat providing un fragmented hardwood
wetlands for interior neo tropical migratory bird habitat and restoring hardwoods on selected
sites The CWMB represents a large in holding of non NFS land within the Croatan National
Forest Transfer of the CWMB property would help consolidate NFS land boundaries and would
serve to mitigate for fragmentation caused by the proposed bypass
Therefore the CWMB will provide project mitigation for jurisdictional wetland impacts and
mitigation for the use of and fragmentation of CNF lands Active red cockaded woodpecker
(RCW) groups occur on NFS lands nearby so habitat management on appropriate sites within
the CWMB may serve to strengthen an RCW dispersal corridor and eventually provide some
habitat for foraging and roosting With the cooperation of the USFS NCDOT has developed
mitigation plans for wetlands and Proposed Endangered Threatened or Sensitive species
The CWMB consists predominantly of mterstream flats with a gradual down - gradient slope from
Long Lake at approximately 38 feet elevation to East Prong Brice Creek at approximately 20
C.

feet elevation Soils mapping and on site investigations indicate that up to 98 percent of the
CWMB historically may have been wetland
It is anticipated that sufficient mitigation is available in the CWMB to provide compensation for
the wetland and stream impacts associated with the proposed Havelock Bypass
FEDERAL THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E) Threatened (T) or officially Proposed
(P) for such listing are protected under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as
amended (16 U S C 1531 1543) Table 5 shows federal protected species that are listed for the
project study area for Craven County as of September 22 2010 and Carteret County as of
March 21 2011 (USFWS list) Species are listed with their status and biological conclusion
Table 5
Federally Protected Species in Craven and Carteret Counties
(USFWS County List Updates Craven — 22 September 2010 Carteret — 21 March 2011)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Presen Preset t b
Biological Conclusion
Shortnose sturgeon
Aci enserbrewrostrum
E
Ca
No Effect
American alligator
AIA ator missIssi lens►s
T S/A
Cr Ca
Not Required
Loggerhead sea turtle
Caretta caretta
T
Ca
No Effect
Green sea turtle
Che/onia m das
T
Ca
No Effect
Leatherback sea turtle
Dermoche/ s conacea
E
Cr Ca
No Effect
Hawksbill sea turtle
Eretmochel s imbncata
E
Ca
No Effect
Kemp s ridley sea turtle
Le ldochel s kem u
E
Ca
No Effect
Piping lover
Charadnus melodus
T
Ca
No Effect
Red cockaded
woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Cr Ca
Unresolved
Roseate tern
Sterna dou allu dougallu
T
Ca
No Effect
West Indian manatee
Tnchechus manatus
E
Cr Ca
No Effect
Sensitive jointvetch
Aesch nomene virg►nica
T
Cr
No Effect
Seabeach amaranth
Amaranthus pumdus
T
Ca
No Effect
Rough leaved loosestnfe
Lys►machia
as erulaefolia
E
Cr Ca
Not Likely to Adversely
Affect
a E Endangered T Threatened T(S /A) Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
b Cr Craven County Ca Carteret County
Surveys for federally listed species will be updated as needed as the project progresses A
biological conclusion for red cockaded woodpeckers will be rendered once a preferred
alternative has been selected
PROPOSED ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND SENSITIVE (PETS) SPECIES
In addition to plant and animal species receiving protection under the Endangered Species Act
the U S Forest Service (USFS) maintains their own list of Proposed Endangered Threatened
and Sensitive (PETS) species for the CNF and considers these species when determining
impacts to National Forest System (NFS) lands Since all of the study alternatives cross NFS
lands a special use permit from the USFS will be required to provide the lands for the proposed
project Prior to approving a special use permit for the project the USFS requires that the
project study area be evaluated for PETS species Surveys for PETS will be updated as the
project progresses
rl

An update of the PETS species analysis was conducted to address the latest (October 2010)
USFS PETS species list Results of the analysis Included dropping 28 PETS plant species and
57 PETS animal species from consideration because no suitable habitat (sandhllls marl
outcrops ocean beach tidal swamps and marshes maritime forest etc ) is present within or In
close proximity to any of the study alternatives No documented occurrences of these species
are present within or in close proximity to any of the study alternatives Table 6 lists the 70
PETS plant species and Table 7 lists the 34 PETS animal species that have documented
occurrences or for which potential habitat is present in at least one of the alternatives These
tables also list if potential direct and /or indirect impacts are anticipated
Table 6
PETS Plant Species for which Potential Habitat is Present
Common Name
2
U
U)
LL
�a
s 1,0 z
m —�
� °
2,-7— o
E
Nate. N
N L_
C
7 N L
m
o 3
Potential Effects
Documented on
NFS Lands within
Protect Alternative b
Documented on
NFS Lands
between Protect
Alternative and
Existing US 70 n
;,
o
E
0
�
C
N
n°
a
m
C
N
C
N
o°
r'
>
(6
E
a�
N
>
N
E
Q
Q
co
>
6
E
m
Q
>
N
`
Q
N
>
(0
E
a�
Q
C7
>
(6
E
a�
Q
Rough leaved loosestrde
E
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Many flower grass pink
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Savanna campylopus
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Small spreading pogonia
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Venus flytrap
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Hall s pocket moss
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Pondspice
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Boykin s lobelia
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Raven s seedbox
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Loomis s loosestrife
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Birds in a nest (Carolina bogmmt)
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Narrowleaf cowlily
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Piedmont cowbane
S
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Carolina grass of parnassus
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Pineland plantain
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yellow fringeless orchid
S
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hookers milkwort
S
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Short bristled beaksedge
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Southern white beaksedge
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Thorne s beaksedge
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grassleaf arrowhead
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Carolina goldenrod
S
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Spring flowering goldenrod
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Fitzgerald s peatmoss
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Florida peatmoss
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Giant spiral orchid
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Piedmont meadowrue
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Carolina asphodel
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Branched gerardia
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tall bentgrass
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Bog bluestem
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes

Common Name
N
3
2
U)
LL
Q
aa
g co u-
M Z 2
E LL
E z o
v E
N O N
N L
N V) C
N ,=
U N
QO 3
u-
Potential Effects
Documented on
NFS Lands within
Project Alternative
Documented on
NFS Lands
between Project
Alternative and
Existing US 70 °
o
E
u
Q
C
N
O
a
v
E
—
C
(0
C
O
o
>
N
C
N
Q
N
>
f0
C
N
Q
M
>
f0
C
N
Q
>
(0
E
N
Q
N
>
f6
C
N
Q
M
>
f0
C
N
¢
Chapman s three awn
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Savanna milkweed
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Stalked milkweed
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
White Doll s lily
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Widow sedge
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Emmon s sedge
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Hop like sedge
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Leconte s thistle
LR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Spring coral root
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Beadle s coreopsis
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Carolina sunrose
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Fernald s tick trefoil
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Hidden flowered witch grass
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Eaton s witch grass
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Comfortroot
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Catchfly cutgrass
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Lejeunea bermudiana (a liverwort)
LR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Florida adder s mouth
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Shortleaf basket grass
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Mudbank crown grass
LR
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Spoonflower
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Hairy smartweed
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Small butterwort
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Plagiochda ludowacrana (a liverwort)
LR
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Plagiochila miradorensis var miradorensis (a
liverwort
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Snowy orchid
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Shadow witch
LR
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dwarf live oak
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
rNo
Canby s bulrush
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Drooping bulrush
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
o
Baldwin s nutrush
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
One flower hardscale
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Leavenworth s goldenrod
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Twisted leaf goldenrod
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Giant peatmoss
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Eaton s ladies tresses
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Dwarf bladderwort
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Florida yellow eyed grass
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
A yellow eyed grass
LR
Yes
1
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Total Species
9
11
9
16
15
16
12
18
a USFS Status E — Endangered LR — Locally Rare S — Sensitive T — Threatened T S/A — Threatened due to
Similarity of Appearance
b Documentation based on data provided by USFS NCNHP and occurrences documented during field surveys
9

Table 7
PETS Animal Species for which Potential Habitat is Present
Common Name
U)
(n
LL
4Ei t Documented
E �,
2 W LL
o . — Z
C
a
E 7 LL J 2
U
o 0LL
(U Z
Z v
Potential Effects
Documented on NFS
Lands within Protect
n
Alternative
a > 7
C CN CM
N N N
Q Q Q
on NFS
Lands between
Protect Alternative and
e
Existing US 70
J >
Cr CN C:M
N N 8
Q Q Q
f0
CL
E
v
C
N
d
a
E
w
C
C
N
d
Mammals
Rafinesque s big eared bat
S
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Southeastern myotis
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Eastern woodrat (coastal plain population)
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Birds
Red cockaded woodpecker
E
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
I Yes
Yes
Bald eagle
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Bachman s sparrow
LR
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Eastern Henslow s sparrow
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Black throated green warbler (coastal plain
population)
LR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Black necked stilt
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Reptiles and Amphibians
American alligator
T S/A
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Mimic glass lizard
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Carolina gopher frog
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Eastern diamondback rattlesnake
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Southern hognose snake
LR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Glossy crayfish snake
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Black swamp snake
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Insects
Arogos skipper
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Duke s skipper
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Venus flytrap cutworm moth
S
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Carters noctuid moth
S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Little metalmark
LR
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Cypress daggermoth
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Acrorncta sinescnpta (a dagger moth)
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Agrohs carobna (a dart moth)
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Dusky roadside skipper
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Apantensis sp 1 nr carlotta (a tiger moth)
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Bleptrna sangamonta (a noctwd moth)
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Frosted elfin
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Dismal swamp stink bug
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Berry s skipper
LR
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Two dotted skipper
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Anointed sallow moth
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Freshwater Fish Mollusks & Crustaceans
Graceful clam shrimp
LR
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Bridle shiner
LR
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Total Species
4
6
5
9
8
9
6
9
a USFS Status E — Endangered LR — Locally Rare S — Sensitive T — Threatened T S/A — Threatened due to
Similarity of Appearance
b Documentation based on data provided by USFS NCNHP and occurrences documented during field surveys
Occurrence on NFS lands based on NCNHP record for an unspecified observation in Craven County
d Potential direct effects for red cockaded woodpecker only to foraging habitat no cavity trees affected
10

MINIMIZATION OF EFFECTS TO PROTECTED SPECIES
NCDOT has been working with USFS to minimize effects to federally listed species and PETS
species Minimization measures include temporary closure of the bypass to allow for prescribed
burns on NFS lands avoiding the use of invasive non native species for erosion control and
limiting the use of herbicides where the proposed bypass occurs on NFS lands
WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS
The project will not impact any Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included in the
list of study rivers (Public Law 90 542 as amended)
CULTURAL RESOURCES
The potential of the Havelock Bypass to impact cultural resources was evaluated in accordance
with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended Potential
effects were determined using Criteria for Effect and Adverse Effect (36 CFR 800 9) developed
by the Advisory Council on Historic preservation
Historic Architecture Resources
The State Historic Preservation Office has concurred in a letter dated August 31 1994 that the
Needham B White House is the only property in the project study area listed in or eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places This property located along existing US 70 in
Havelock is not within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) of any of the bypass alternatives
On December 5 2006 the NCDOT the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the
SHPO met for a consultation concerning the project bypass alternatives There were no
properties over fifty years old within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) considered eligible for the
National Register Furthermore there are no properties within the APE which are considered to
have achieved historic significance within the past 50 years
Archaeological Resources
The archaeological background study and field reconnaissance of the bypass alternatives
entitled Archaeological Background Report US 70 Havelock Bypass Craven County, North
Carolina (Greg C Smith 1997)' indicates there were no known archaeological sites in the
vicinity of the bypass alternatives listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP) The study indicated seven previously recorded archaeological sites within
Alternatives 1 2 and 3 Two of these sites (31 CV164 ** and 31 CV170 * *) located on National
Forest System lands at the edge of Alternative 3 (the Preferred Alternative) were recommended
for further testing to determine if they are eligible for listing
In 1999 an intensive terrestrial archaeological survey of the high probability soil within the
Alternative 3 (the Preferred Alternative) Area of Potential Effect (APE = 327 acres) was
conducted (Smith et al 2000) The two previously recorded archaeological sites (Sites
31 CV164 ** and 31 CV170 * *) recommended for further testing were found and evaluated during
11

the course of the intensive survey Site 31 CV164 ** was investigated and recommended as not
eligible for the NRHP Site 31 CV170 ** was not fully assessed because its location was
considered outside the project limits however it was recommended as eligible for the NRHP
per Criterion A according to its archaeological site form on file at the Office of State
Archaeology
As a result of the terrestrial survey 15 previously unrecorded archaeological sites were
discovered Subsurface testing demonstrated that 14 of the sites do not exhibit characteristics
that would make them eligible for listing in the NRHP However Site 31CV302 (located on
National Forest System lands) was found to contain intact subsurface deposits that have the
potential to contribute new information regarding regional prehistory therefore Site 31 CV302 is
recommended as eligible for the NRHP per Criterion D In a letter dated December 22 2004
the SHPO concurred with these findings
Based on current design plans Site 31 CV170 ** and Site 31 CV302 will be avoided however if
design plans change and avoidance is not possible then mitigation efforts will be conducted
prior to construction activities if data recovery investigations are needed at least nine months
will be needed for these investigations prior to construction
Two cemeteries (Rowe Family Cemetery [31 CV300 * *] and Wynne Family Cemetery
[31 CV301 * *] neither located on National Forest System lands) have been recorded within the
project vicinity Based on current design plans neither cemetery is located within the Area of
Potential Effect therefore there will be no impacts to either cemetery However if design plans
change prior to construction and avoidance is no longer possible then relocation in accordance
with existing State statutes is appropriate
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Since no known UST sites are located in the bypass study area the project will have no impact
on these facilities However the proposed bypass may impact one former solid waste landfill
site identified in the project study area The corridor that crosses this site is common to all three
bypass alternatives This site is on National Forest System lands immediately behind the
Craven County waste transfer site on the southwest side of existing US 70 near the
northwestern project limits The exact limits of the former landfill site have been obscured by the
construction of the County waste transfer facility Since the right of way for the proposed facility
will require a portion of the County waste transfer site the project may require a small area of
this former landfill depending on the landfill limits When the right of way limits are established it
will be determined whether this landfill is impacted If the site is impacted an assessment will be
conducted to determine the presence and if necessary the levels of contamination of the
involved property If contamination is found options to remediate the contamination will be
evaluated and coordinated with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U S Forest Service
The U S Forest Service has indicated a potential contamination issue at the Craven County
Waste Transfer Station on National Forest System lands They have directed the County to
clean spills repair containers for hazardous waste and install secondary containment systems
for all containers intended for liquid or hazardous waste When the final right of -way limits are
established it will be determined whether this area is impacted If the necessary right of way
requires portions of the facility an assessment will be conducted to determine the presence
and if necessary the levels of contamination of the involved property If contamination is found
12

options to remediate the contamination will be evaluated and discussed with the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U S Forest Service
Another potentially contaminated property an automobile parts salvage yard is located along
SR 1756 (Lake Road) Although this property is within the study area it is not within any of the
Bypass corridors and will not be impacted by the proposed project
In accordance with NCDOT Policy on hazardous materials if any additional contaminated sites
or underground storage tanks are discovered on the project they will be assessed and
recommendations for right of way and construction will be provided at that time
LOGICAL TERMINI / INDEPENDENT UTILITY
Federal Highway Authority (FHWA) regulations [23 CFR 771 111(f)] outline three general
principals to determine project limits The regulations state
In order to ensure meaningful evaluation of alternatives and to avoid commitments to
transportation improvements before they are fully evaluated the action evaluated in
each EIS or FONSI shall
Connect logical termini and be of sufficient length to address environmental
matters on a broad scope
• Have independent utility or interdependent significance ► e be usable and be a
reasonable expenditure even If no additional transportation improvements ►n the
area are made and
Not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable
transportation improvements
The project s termini and other elements meet the FHWA s criteria for logical termini
The logical termini for this proposed action were determined to be approximately one -mile west
of the existing US 70 /SR 1760 (Hickman Hill Loop Road) intersection northwest of Havelock
and southeast of the US 70 /SR 1824 (McCotter Boulevard) intersection southeast of Havelock
The increased traffic and lack of access control with numerous street and driveway connections
to the adjacent development in Havelock substantially reduce the mobility of this corridor
Currently 14 traffic signals prohibit uninterrupted service along the existing corridor through
Havelock The project termini extend beyond those signals and the commercially developed
areas within the city limits of Havelock The distance between the termini allows the
consideration of various transportation improvements with a broad scope of environmental
considerations to satisfy the purpose and need for the project Since the project extends through
the most congested portion of US 70 it will have independent utility and be a reasonable
expenditure regardless of other transportation improvements in the area
13

Enclosed you will find a completed ENG Form 4345 and mailing labels This submittal is in
accordance with Step 4 of the guidelines for integrating project review under the National
Environmental Policy Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act This letter along with the
previously distributed DEIS should provide sufficient information for the issuance of a Public
Notice for the project The public hearing was conducted on December 6 2011 and the Post
Hearing Meeting is scheduled for February 2 2012
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Mark Pierce PE at
[phone]
S1
iorpe P D Manager
lopment nd Environmental Analysis Unit
CC Mr David Wainwright NCDWQ (7 copies)'
Mr Travis Wilson NCWRC
Mr Chris Militscher USEPA
Mr Gary Jordan USFWS
Mr John F Sullivan III FHWA
Mr Brian Yamamoto P E Project Development Section
Mr Jay Bennett P E Roadway Design Unit
Mr Phil Harris P E Natural Environment Section
Mr Ray McIntyre P E TIP Development Unit
Dr David Chang P E Hydraulics Unit
Mr Greg Perfetti P E Structure Design Unit
Mr Mark Staley Roadside Environmental Unit
Mr Neil Lassiter P E Division Engineer Division 2
Mr Jay B Johnson DEO Division 2
14

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325) 1 OMB APPROVAL NO 0710 003
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions
Searching existing data sources gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information including suggestions for reducing this burden to
Department of Defense Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway Suite
1204 Arlington VA 22202 4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget Paperwork Reduction Project (0710 003) Washington DC 20503
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority 33 USC 401 Section 10 1413 Section 404 Principal Purpose These laws require permits authorizing activities in or affecting navigable
waters of the United States the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States and the transportation of dredged material for the
purpose of dumping it into ocean waters Routine uses Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit
Disclosure Disclosure of requested information is voluntary If information is not provided however the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the proposed activity An
application that Is not completed in full will be returned
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1 APPLICATION NO 2 FIELD OFFICE CODE 3 DATE RECEIVED 4 DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5 APPLICANTS NAME
8 AUTHORIZED AGENT S NAME & TITLE (an agent is not required)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
14 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
6 APPLICANT S ADDRESS
9 AGENTS ADDRESS
Attn Mark Pierce PDEA Unit
Craven NC
1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1548
COUNTY STATE
7 APPLICANT S PHONE NUMBERS WITH AREA CODE
10 AGENT S PHONE NUMBERS WITH AREA CODE
a Residence
a Residence
b Business 919 707 6000 (fax [phone])
b Business
11 STATEMENT OF
AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize
to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish upon request supplemental information In support of this permit application
APPLICANT S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12 PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
US 70 Havelock Bypass Craven County, NC
13 NAME OF WATERBODY IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Trlbs of Tucker Creek and Slocum Creek
15 LOCATION OF PROJECT
Craven NC
COUNTY STATE
16 OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS IF KNOWN (see instructions)
From west of the US 70/ SR 1760 Intersection to southeast of the US 70/ SR 1824 Intersection near Havelock (Neuse Basin)
17 DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See attached vicinity map
ENG FORM 4345 — ONLINE CESPK CO R

18 NATURE OF ACTIVITY (Description of project include all features)
Construct a four lane median divided highway on new location on the west side of US 70 from north of Pine Grove to north
of the Craven Carteret County line in Havelock North Carolina
19 PROJECT PURPOSE (Describe the reason or purpose of the project see instructions)
Improve the traffic operations for regional and statewide traffic along the US 70 corridor and enhance the ability of US 70 to
serve the regulated transportation function in accordance with the Strategic Highway Corridors Plan
USE BLOCKS 20 22 IF DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20 REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE
Construction of the Havelock Bypass will result in roadway fill being placed In Jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters
21 TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS
to be determined
22 SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED (see instructions)
474 acres to 634 acres of wetlands 10 300 linear feet to 16 800 linear feet of streams (alternative ranges 1 000 ft corridors)
23 IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? YES 0 NO @ IF YES DESCRIBE THE WORK
24 ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LESSEES ETC WHOSE PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY (If more than
can be entered here please attach a supplemental list)
See attached mailing list and labels
25 LIST OF OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS /DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES
FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
U S Forest Service Highway Easement to be announced later to be announced later to be announced later
Would include but is not restricted to zoning building and flood plain permits
26 Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application I certify that the information
in this application is complete and accurate I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am
actinq,&<—the n agent of the applicant
<2:XSJ ,201
DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT
DATE
The app %ca on must be sighed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorize agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed
18 U S C Section 1001 provides that Whoever in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United
States knowingly and will fully falsifies conceals or covers up any trick scheme or disguises a material fact or makes any false
faeticious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any
false fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry shall be fined not more than $10 000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both
ENG FORM 4345 — ONLINE CESPK CO R

IlocksVi
rSville
I'll,
4
A.
V,
Study Area
Stella
N
41 P A 1�1
A
4
Arapahoe
0 ad ms
.1 X .,
.eher'ry Point ASXunnincatf* m Fiell,:1
,,Hallock
t
,Holly. prings
Newport
r-- - e.
E3
Project Location
M:., I
R' I
US 70, Havelock Bypass
TIP No. R-1015
Craven County, North Carolina
My
Project Vicinity
Not to Scale
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 3d
Exhibit 3c
Alternative 1
Alternative 3 Exhibit 3b
Alternative 2
Exhibit 3a
US 70, Havelock Bypass
TIP No. R -1015
Craven County, North Carolina
Map Index
Not to Scale
Exhibit 2

s �d
,�sr mss;
--_j
d
Ai
I

� M
r z
N m
O m m
to
O O m
a 3
n
�
G
J
m
a m
1
e
� as auna(a"I dua �
�� �' � � pti �� 'yam•
N
r� w
a
o _

ir0i% = Matcr `i" MatLine C�he
m
a.
N ,m
®c
1
�w
oa
s
o�
i�
m
C
C
0.
•
w
m
7
O
� A W
e�' N
r
T
ti
�o
CL
N m �
r
3
♦ m ® of a Q
t Q CL
�� 00 c
CL
CD
��o

N W
!MM dw
s v �
� A
°
� 7
Z d
rJ
V _
L T
W
N
N _
e
P
CD CC
oom�
�. aaCC C CL
n
CL
X
i�

6-022 -002 -A
HARDISON, JEAN
6-022 -017
X\ HARDISON, ROBERT B & SUDIE L
6-027 -001 KINCAID, WALTER J & DOROTHY H
6-027 -002 & -003 BRIDGEWATER, CAROL ANN LAY ". ""'. " " " ""
6 -027\ -004 DAW, EDNA ~
6-027 -005 TADLO \ \\ ANN CARR `-
6-027 -006,-007, &-008 BAKER, MARY S
6-027 -009 K \\
OONTZ, DONALD L JR
6-205 -001
U S GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
6-216 -001
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
Havelock Bypass
Jurisditional Waters
and Property Map 1 of 3
---�� Railroad
- 1:24K Hydrology (Outside Corridor)
Jurisdictional Streams
-��- Wetland Boundary
Wetland Hatching
Corridor
Parcels with Jurisdictional Waters
CParcels
1
If,-
35"
0
6.2 03
6'216 002 -
6'216 0
On
6,L16
0 0.1
0
J
10= RLSMIC- L'DAVID- JR 8ISARAi �\
6-025 -003 TIVNAN, DAVIkRLIN I& MARY QUILBAN
6 -025 -004 & 6 -025 -010 DICKERSON, RICKY E &.C\
,6-025 -005 WYNNE, JEFFE YASHF-
�o
6 -025 -006 WYNNE, WILLIAM DENNIS HE
6 -027 -016 DICKERSON, LAURA RENNIE WYNNE
6 -027 -010 DICKERSON, RICKY E & CY THIA.M-
6-027 -011 HONEYCUTT, MARY LOU
\ Goodwin Creek "
6-027 -013 L� DER, WILLIAM L & JAN J
11215 -11002 2 -2J LLC 6 -205 -001 T7,
'I / U S GOVERNMENT
6-215 -009
JACKSON JOHN A,TRUSTE =�
6-215 -10000
JACKSON IRS
VM-W
E1S�P� GNP �,� PL
6-216 -036
U S GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
C)
�d a
I,
�����I /
•
��� 0 i
All •� t% 1
Ma
14V ii Mlk no VWX
70
rz
C-j

0
C
0 Q. �D
O CD CD M. N �. 0
n 0 N fn (A
O 0
C)
O O Q J7 o O O
CL CL r Q
_ Co O
L n C 0 5�
co
Co3� Q CD ED
O
CD —h
CA)
CO O
z CD -1
mm O
O
Z c
p Cf)
r- O
C13 O
m
-� rn m
�N m
.. ......... Z N
�o Z
• ............
cn rn –I °
.. .... .. CA
co
� O
Z7
m
m
O m
z M
....... ....
m
C Drn
cn m
fn
................
c ... o
M O rn m ........-- cn
cn
co -<o
>* mp
r •- z
ya r-
m CA go rO
ZN
<
m
OD
ZZO
C D o
r rn_ _ -� n rn O �t
..............
C.) m r m < ... ... .......
w n In m
pD = ---\ 0 ....
m oco ° o �K O.o°
...
N `..
CD cn c
r
rn
m
cn O
.Zl (n
<O QoO
z mo Z�
�
�O < Z — -
G � m 0 m>
C
IAO
D° m° Off.
mw'
S
0 w Z V Z
O_......
Z;v z
° 0�
> A �N a ��� z . .
N pD Qo8 z ° m
m O cn N
�DN �o Z ;o
M!2 oo m z. �n� m.w P rov
<\:q r:o
mt ;oZ m
CD.W V O m.;h. W•N•90 O Z K Z co
O N N N N, N•N N N N • '? • -�, r
40-00 co,
�� cn cn U) cn -cn (n c) 0 = / m
C O O_ O O�OO�O O �7,0� N• ``VlJ�fy \
/ 0 M� O A /C°DtW -4 0�JC71\M CD A W �•D N v/ O CO
CD
M rD�_�,p KrD,-o i { D 2 O_o cn D co
�z`- Zm�=rn�mcn_M•K ao D�T.a z CD M
M �—m
m
D.�2Z�OprOm- � © �� �D rr-'
r'�rrP�2m'Z'DC,�mm -I N O IZ�� �� 00 n
DCl)j;m0,- ��.m.r-cn< 0 �G ®Oz
N ��D•Z D.,� m = n`-a m
cn -C-) - p. = cn K Z C: rr--
z
:D:o�`cDO - ; \� D z m
„m'22 mm� D < Dm
Z m� m r'f?o
r
p D D�Cf) D O r-.6
w
z Z
T Z

CL
cn CD
•-
• AL 0
•
• •
• • CD
•. ■
•;
•
• • -
0 CD
-
Cn • �.
® .*► - •
'•-
���
CO •,•�/� -
• w ♦mil
/111111
'� = X11111
p ■�I�II
A - � X111111
- - PR X11111
� - i j11111
11111
1■■■■Ii� no mill
PEP
IPOP ME
�� 111 ►� .: I ��i ���f� • ���� _
NOW- /�: �I ���I ��% �_ gun_ __ .■��►``\
�� ��� � � � � ♦ � „ :m� viii
``I/ /_I /IIIIIIIIj_���� 1��;�; i �C �� .��� �� ������� ♦�I ♦� ♦1
• - �. = n : CAD =� _._ =i �����/ • �� �� �� :��i :� ���������� 1/
�// ��Iltllllllllifllll \ \ \■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■���j �. /� I�

Easy Peel Labels I A See Instruction Sheet 1 (, CAJ
Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 596OTM+ R iFeed Paper for Easy Peel Feature
2 2.1 LLC Barbara Abba & Hubert Cade Pulley
PO Box 249 201 Pulley Rd
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
Armistead Properties LLC
410 Benedict Ave Apt 3J
Tarrytown NY 10591
Mary B Baker
119 Ketner Blvd
Havelock NC 28532
Michael Glenn Chadwick Jr
200 Thompsonfield
Gloucester NC 28528
Betsy & Belangia Clyde 0 Davis Jr
PO Box 171
New Bern NC 28563
Laura Rennie Wynne Dickerson
7510 US Highway 70 E
New Bern NC 28560
Forest Oaks Memorial Gardens Inc
PO Box 323
Havelock NC 28532
Daniel Warren Grubbs
310 B Lake Rd
Havelock NC 28532
Shelbie E Hardison Et Al
195 Redwood Ln
New Bern NC 28560
Indian Trails Community Association
PO Box 29
Havelock NC 28532
Etiquettes facdes a peter
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5960""
SAVERY0596OTM 1
Charles J & Madeline D Allen
14196 Regent Ct
Woodbridge VA 22193
Mary E Armstrong Howard Babbitt
202 Gray Rd 56 East Williams St
Havelock NC 28532 Angier NC 27501
Carole Ann Layman Bridgewater Clarence Caldwell
284 Mill Creek Rd 101 Gray Rd
Newport NC 28570 Havelock NC 28532
Steven D & Tricia Chapman Malcolm D Cieszko
305 Punch Bowl St 857 Lizzard Slip Rd
Beaufort SC 29902 Washington NC 27889
Edna Daw Department Of Transportation
7555 US Highway 70 E 150 E Arlington Blvd Ste E 1
New Bern NC 28562 Greenville NC 27858
Ricky E & Cynthia M Dickerson Ricky E & Cynthia M & Dickerson
116 Boros Lndg 107 Boros Lndg
New Bern NC 28560 New Bern NC 28560
Freedom Baptist Church Of Havelock Vilas & Margaret E Geier
600 Lake Rd 211 Dowling Dr
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
Jean Hardison Robert B & Sudie L Hardison
7155 US Highway 70 E 608 Lilliput Dr
New Bern NC 28562 New Bern NC 28562
Havelock Tyler Place Apartments Llc Mary Lou Honeycutt
PO Box 17022 7630 US Highway 70 E
Raleigh NC 27619 New Bern NC 28560
John A Jackson Trustee Margaret Ellen Jones
PO Box 249 900 Sunset Dr
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
A — O / 5 Consultez la feuille www avery corn
Sens de chargement ' ,.,� d instruction 1 800 GO AVERY

Easy Peel Labels !t� I w See Instruction Sheet I !A
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960TM ® iFeed Paper for Easy Peel Feature 1
Verna R & Bryan Ernest H Kempton Walter J & Dorothy H Kincaid
PO Box 505 7515 US Highway 70 E
Newport NC 28570 New Bern NC 28562
Longview Park Holdings LLC William L & Jan J Luzadder
56 E Williams St 3 Indian Way
Angier NC 27501 Havelock NC 28532
Thomas W & Rowena Mcguffin Joseph C & Lisa M Mitchell
304 Lake Rd 105 S Bridle Ln
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
Corbit L Norris & Nevin G Norris George Thomas Norris
1030 Belangia Rd 305 Gray Rd
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
Theresa M Paride Larry S & Nancy C Paul
102 S Bridle Ln PO Box 1062
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
Powell Properties LLC William M & Mary F Romps
115 Hazeldale Ln 103 E Bridle Ln
New Bern NC 28560 Havelock NC 28532
John P & Marjorie S Sadler Jr Delbert Carl Sanderson Sr
554 Deer Run Rd 909 Sunset Dr
New Bern NC 28562 Havelock NC 28532
Herbert & Christine Smith Bobby L & Sheryl L Sykes
302 Lake Rd 104 S Bridle Ln
Havelock NC 28532 Havelock NC 28532
Michael David & Sara N Thorsby David Arlin & Mary Quilban Tivnan
7180 US Highway 70 E 7250 US Highway 70 E
New Bern NC 28560 New Bern NC 28560
U S A Forest Service U S Forestry Service
PO Box 2750 General Delivery
Asheville NC 28802 New Bern NC 28562
Etiquettes faoles A peter A "Ic — /d /S
t1bhrP7 la aahant AVFRVO SgFinmc Sans dP charnPmPnt -W � -V
aAVERY ®5960TM 1
Donald L Koontz Jr
114 Frost Ct
New Bern NC 28560
Mar Stal LLC
PO Box 778
Havelock NC 28532
N C Dept Of Transportation
601 S Glenburnie Rd
New Bern NC 28560
Monzell Norris
6960 US Highway 70 E
New Bern NC 28560
Pine Island Corporation
PO Box 7096
Wilson NC 27895
David T & Sylvia Mabe Rowe Et Al
1 Nicklaus Dr
New Bern NC 28560
William Edward & Rosita B Scoby
6123 Farrington Rd Apt A15
Chapel Hill NC 27517
Jo Ann Carr Tadlock
212 Pine Dale Rd
Havelock NC 28532
Margaret E Trader & Ernest Trader
602 Lake Rd
Havelock NC 28532
U S Government Property
141 E Fisher Ave
New Bern NC 28560
Consultez la feudle www avery corn
d inctrurtinn i Ann rO AVFRV

Easy Peel Labels I A See Instruction Sheet i
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960TM
R
!Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature 1
Jewel Maurice & Patricia Ann Wall
400 Lake Rd
Havelock NC 28532
i
Weyerhaeuser Company
1785 Weyerhaeuser Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
William Dennis & Michele Wynne
7470 US Highway 70 E
New Bern NC 28560
Daniel F & Virginia D Walsh
706 Lee Dr
Havelock NC 28532
R Graham & Phyllis Hughes Williams
4204 Old Cherry Point Rd
New Bern NC 28560
AVERY05960TM 1
a
A D Wetherington
1675 Tiny Bryan Rd
Havelock NC 28532
Wynne Family Trust
312 Holly Ln
Swansboro NC 28584
Etiquettes faales a peler A S-/4111-16 Consultez la feuille www avery com
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY0 5960M` Sens de chargement = ,.AV -� d instruction 1 800 GO AVERY