The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20120147 Ver 1_401 Application_20120212UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 0 1 2 0 1 4 7 MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX 20004 CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542 -0004 RI REPLY REFER 70 5090 11 2 BEMD JAN 3 1 2012 From Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Le3eune To Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn, Brad Shaver Subs PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR THE CAMP GEIGER ACCESS UPGRADES ON MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE NORTH CAROLINA Encl (1) Pre - Construction Notification Form for P1268B Camp Geiger Access Upgrades on Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune (CamLe3) 1 The enclosed application to discharge fill into Section 404 wetlands to construct the Camp Geiger Access Upgrades, a road widening project, on Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp Le3eune (CamLe]) is submitted for your review and approval 2 MCB CamLe3 proposes to permanently impact 0 16 acres of Section 404 wetlands, to complete the project described in the application This project does not require compensatory mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 3 The point of contact for this project is Mr Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Division, at telephone (910) 451 -7235 or email martin korenek@usmc mil JOHN R TOWNSON By direction Copy -to DENR, DWQ,_ 401 Section EL NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section WRO NCDENR, DCM Martin Korenek, Management 13 . —. U -v -C� �n� FEB 1 0 2012 DENR WATER QUALITY iIANOJAND STORMWATERMKH PAY 122327 1 RICHARD CATLIN &ASSOCIATES INC Newerid 6eenk dba CATLIN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS Wilmin0�vn tVC PO OOX 10278 WILMINGTON NC 28404 0278 66-987/531 (810)452 5861 f February 8 2012 Two Hundred Forty and 00/100 Dollars TO THE NCDENR 24000 ORDER Division of Administration OF 127 Cardinal Drive Extension° o� Wilmington NC 28405 3845 'f c� �o 11'12232 ?v ix53)098 ? ?i 0051 ?8506ti11' RICHARD CATLIN & ASSOCIATES INC 122327 dba CATLIN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS Check Date 2/8/2012 Invoice Number Date I Voucher Amount Discounts Previous Pay Net Amount 020812 2/8/2012 IOOOOD0006535 24000 24000 NCDENR New Bridge Bank TOTAL. 1 INCDENR 24000 24000 UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX 20004 CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542 0004 37(�P M REPLY IURR 70 5090 11 2 BEMD JAN 3 1 ?012 From Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Le3eune To Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn, Brad Shaver Sub3 PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR THE CAMP GEIGER ACCESS UPGRADES ON MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE NORTH CAROLINA Encl (1) Pre - Construction Notification Form for P1268B Camp Geiger Access Upgrades on Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Le3eune (CamLe3) 1 The enclosed application to discharge fill into Section 404 wetlands to construct the Camp Geiger Access Upgrades, a road widening project, on Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp Le3eune (CamLe3? is submitted for your review and approval 2 MCB CamLe3 proposes to permanently impact 0 16 acres of Section 404 wetlands, to complete the project described in the application This project does not require compensatory mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 3 The point of contact for this project is Mr Martin Korenek, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division, at telephone (910) 451- -7235 or email martin korenek@usmc mil JOHN R TOWNSON By direction Copy to NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section RAL NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section WRO NCDENR, DCM FE'��Z012 pENR d a 'JUALITY �n»tonci et818i Branch �1) r� 11 2 0 1 2 0 1 4 7 of wa rE9 o�' p Office Use Only 1 i y Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008 N,__/ tr / V Page I of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version Pre- Cons tt uction Notification PCN Form A A rknllon nt Info, maiion 1 Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 14 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No ld Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval Is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No 1f Is payment Into a mitigation bank or In lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of Impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program � Yes ®No 1g is the project located In any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h below ® Yes ❑ No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2 2a Project Information Name of project P12688 Camp Geiger Access Upgrades p 2b County Onsiow Jacksonville NC 2c Nearest municipality / town 2d Subdivision name N/A 0 201 2e NCDOT only T I P or state ro ect no N/A DENR �Tjp 3 Owner Information aterBranch 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed United States of America 3b Deed Book and Page No N/A 31; applicable Party (for LLC If Commanding Officer United States Marine Corps Base Camp LeJeune NC 3d Street address Building 1005 Michael Road 3e City state zip Camp LeJeune NC 28542 3f Telephone no (910) 4512213 3g Fax no (910) 4512927 3h Email address earl h baker @usmc mil N,__/ tr / V Page I of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version �O�OF W ATFAOG _ c � y 0 < 2 0 1 2 0 1 4 7 Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification PC Form A Applicant Information 1 Processing la Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 14 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No 1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No If Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1g Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h below ® Yes ❑ No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2 Project Information 2a Name of project P1 268B Camp Geiger Access Upgrades 2b County Onslow Lsk��Lguky/ig 2c Nearest municipality / town Jacksonville NC 2d Subdivision name N/A 0 Z012 2e NCDOT only TIP or state project no N/A DENR WATER QUAUn 3 Owner Information N 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed United States of America 3b Deed Book and Page No N/A 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) Commanding Officer United States Marine Corps Base Camp LeJeune NC 3d Street address Building 1005 Michael Road 3e City state zip Camp LeJeune NC 28542 3f Telephone no (910) 451 2213 3g Fax no (910) 4512927 3h Email address earl h baker @usmc mil Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent ❑ Other specify 4b Name 4c Business name (if applicable) 4d Street address 4e City state zip 4f Telephone no 4g Fax no 4h Email address 5 AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Denise L Freund PE 5b Business name (if applicable) WK Dickson & Co Inc 5c Street address 909 Market Street 5d City state zip Wilmington NC 28409 5e Telephone no (910) 762 -4200 5f Fax no (910) 762 -4201 5g Email address dlfreund@charter net Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version B Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 436001377695 lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) Latitude 34 72417 Longitude 7745917 (DD DDDDDD) (DD DDDDDD) 1 c Property size 101 999 43 acres 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to Edwards Creek Southwest Creek proposed project 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water SC HOW NSW / C HOW NSW 2c River basin White Oak HUC 03030001 3 Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The land cover classification for the existing conditions on the site include Category 1 Heavily Developed or Disturbed Land and Category 42 Needleleaf Coniferous Forest Land The appropriate land use category is 103 06 Military Installations The majority of the project takes place on existing roadway alignments open athletic and training fields and wooded areas directly adjacent to existing development Wetlands identified in the Jurisdictional Determination are non riparian wetlands 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property The project is located within the confines of greater MCB Camp Lejeune Wetland acreage within the general project area including delineations and Jurisdictional Determinations for MCAS New River and Geiger West is approximately 214 95 acres 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property The project is located within the confines of greater MCB Camp Lejeune There are no existing streams identified on the Junsdicabonal Determinations for MCAS New River and Geiger West within the project limits 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The purpose of the project is to provide improved access to Camp LeJeune While Camp Geiger is a part of MCB Camp LeJeune it is located separately from Mainside Prior to the US 17 Bypass construction entry to Camp Geiger was via a main gate off US 17 Construction of the bypass eliminated this gate and access to Camp Geiger is current through the main gate for MCAS New River Air Station Attempts to create anew gate to Camp Geiger from the US 17 Bypass were determined not to be feasible due to ATFP concerns Curtis Road is the primary route through MCAS New River Air Station and access to Camp Geiger from Curbs Road is currently provided on A Street Options to improve access to Camp Geiger from Curtis Road were developed with consideration to safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic for both Camp Geiger and MCAS New River Air Station Widening of A Street the current entrance road from Curbs Road to Camp Geiger was determined not to be feasible given the dose proximity of Progress Energy substations that would limit the lane configurations below what was determined to be required to safely and efficiently move traffic through the Intersection Due to the constraints of the electrical substations it was determined that the entrance roadway to Camp Geiger would have to be on new alignment 3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used The overall project includes the widening of existing roadways and construction of new roadways to improve access to Camp Geiger Associated with the roadway work are clearing and grubbing grading operations paving operations drainage improvements ubliity adjustments roadway lighting erosion control landscaping and other associated improvements The equipment used for construction will primarily be heavy construction equipment All temporary impacts within the wetland limits will be stabilized and restored to pre- construction contours and seeded with appropriate wetland species All disturbed areas outside the wetland limits will be stabilized with sod following achievement of final grading Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version 4 Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ®Yes ❑ No El Unknown protect (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type ❑ Preliminary ® Final of determination was made? 4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company Geo-Manne Inc /Tetra Tech Inc Name (d known) Jef DeBerry / Brad Shaeffer Other To be determined based on input from the Base 4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation MCAS New River Air Station Action ID SAW 2010 -00796 Notification of Junsdicational Determination Final 10/28/10 USMC Camp LeJeune (Includes Geiger West) Action Id 2008 2723 Notification of Jurisdictional Determination Final 7/6/09 5 Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes explain Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary 1 a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ® Wetlands ❑ Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404 other) (acres) Temporary W1 ®P ❑ T Fill Pine Flat ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 005 W2 ❑ P ®T Fill Pine Flat ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 008 W3 ®P ❑ T Culvert Pine Flat ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 001 W4 ❑ P ®T Culvert Pine Flat ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 002 W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 016 2h Comments Total Permanent Impacts 0 06 Acres 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404 width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P [IT ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P [IT ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts N Comments Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (d applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary 01 ❑P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑P ❑T 4f Total open water impacts 4g Comments 5 Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Wetiand Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5j Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWO) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary impact required? B1 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑ P [IT ❑ Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P ❑T [3 Yes ❑ No 6h Total buffer impacts 61 Comments Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project The roadway alignments were designed to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands The W1 and W2 impacts at Campbell Street Extension were minimized by shifting the proposed roadway as close as possible to the existing commercial development on the east side of the roadway while still maintaining appropriate setbacks for ATFP requirements and provide driveway connections to the commercial development The impact associated with the W3 impact is a temporary impact associated with the replacement of an existing 36 culvert crossing under Church Street Church Street is being widening through the area of the culvert however the widening is taking place on the opposite side of the roadway minimizing impacts to the wetlands A retaining wall is proposed on each approach to the culvert to prevent fill in the wetlands 1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques During construction the Contractor will be required to install orange safety fencing clearing delineating the limits of disturbance within the wetland areas Also construction equipment will be required to work on matting to minimize disturbance to the root mat Trees that need to be removed in the impact areas will be cut off six inches above the existing grade and will be Idted not dragged from the wetland area to preserve the root mat 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ® No impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? 2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this ❑Payment to in lieu fee program proles ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c Comments 4 Complete If Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 15 6f Total buffer mitigation required 6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 8 of 11 PCN Form - Vernon 13 December 10 2008 Version E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the project include or Is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1b If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why ❑Yes No ❑ Comments 2 Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 24% 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan The stormwater management plan for the overall project has been developed in accordance with Low Impact Development techniques and requirements of NCDENR DWQ for low density stormwater permits Stormwater is primarily being conveyed from the site via sheet flow into open grass swales with culverts At the Commissary and Exchange where there are existing NCDENR high density stormwater permits stormwater drainage systems are utilized to convey runoff to existing stormwater detention basins ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government s jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review ® Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No attached? 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version F Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /stateAocal) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 115 If you answered 'yes to the above does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c If you answered "yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter ) Comments See attachment for Notice of the Record of Decision for the United ® Yes ❑ No States Marine Corps Grow the Force at Marine Corps Base Camp Leleune Marine Corps Air Station New River and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point North Carolina 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after the fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered "yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violations) 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 315 If you answered 'yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility There is no wastewater generated from the proposed project Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version 5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ❑ No impacts? ® Raleigh 5c If yes Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? MCB Camp Lejeune coordinated with USFWS regarding threatened and endangered species 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? MCB Camp Leieune coordinated with USFWS regarding essential fish habitat 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ® Yes ❑ No status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Coordination with MCB Camp Lejeune s Cultural Resources Division 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 year floodplain* ❑ Yes ® No 8b if yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Topographic survey and FEMA Community Flood Panel Number 3720436400) Carl H Baker Applicant/Agent s Printed Name Applicant/ nt s Signature Date (Agent s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version aIV 0 O 0 4 n v � r C � k t N ON 'C', A- R , �y. tAxnse ua os t r r 1-4 m as o" NS e- mF 1 el, Lj jt Z a APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PERMANENT IMPACT W 1 AND rr 'TEMPORARY IMPACT W 2 t w a d p EL g � Q T LEGEND WETlANDS 750 CAPTIMI �n Engineers and Scientists J2D OW Dairy Rwd '� YYLnrngWn 1r0 t&08 � ar Ceryttate Uc mum ao &4#"d q.%m C.QJ85 i T � O I 2 II O 1 I I / H / $ 2 T r i< o t o W -3 PERMANENT IMPACT z <0 01 ACRES \ W -4 TEMPORARY IMPACT . o 002 ACRES ,N� 7 Q . x R� < z W -1 PERMANENT IMPACT 005 ACRES , �vA CAR ` a P L ~ = SFAL o � = M -).,7 N AS ° TEMPORARY v /SF L F / J IMPACT 008 & ACRES 20 0 20 40 60 SCALE 1 20 HORIZ 909 MARKET STREET Date 01/13/12 SWK wILMINGTON NC 28401 (910) 762 4200 Scale 1 P12686 —CAMP GEIGER ACCESS UPGRADES DICKSON Orr Lac lion Dow WETLAND IMPACTS community bt}ootructuro eonwNants N th C Itn Go g Chk DLF DLF So to C in fl id P o} No 20100150 00 WL \` ,oeerr 400 WW-t t - { roa 'OL 41— '�P—1 '031101+ -ow iiw-o !imN iraw bowl »o ur;+ 17Wx 31U Action id WS I 23 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENCINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT County Onsi" U S G S Quad Ca nJ6eieune NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL. DETERMINATION Property Owner /Agent !LM —Camp Legg iiic Consultant Geq- -Marine nee grated Address attg_ Dfarty Korenek *1111. ,f t'�,Dellg= PSC An 20004 27,13 Wgrruder Blvd, Sulie D Camp Wgane, NG 28542 Ham111140, YA 13666 Property description Size (acres) Nearest Town Q= Leieune Nearest Waterway lyprtheast Creek and Wallace Creek River Basin UWS HUC 03U� Coordinates N � W Z Location description The review area is located within Camp Leieuttam_aln de_ and slight] Indleato Which of the 12110wing AnillX A Preliminary Determination Rased on preliminary information, there maybe wetlands on the above described property We strongly suggest you have this property Inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction To be considered final a jurisdictional determination must be verifled by the Corps This prolimmary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331) B Approvdd Determination There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification 7� I here are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Union there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification We strongly suggest you have t1w wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property and/oi our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wationd delineation in a timely manner For a more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final any delineation must be verified by the Corps The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps Once venfied this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years 1- The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 7/6120Q9 Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years f%om the date of this notification Tllere are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present oil the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of Sechon 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed rive years froin the date of this notification The pi operty is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington NC at (252) 946 6481 to determine their requirements Page I of 2 Action ID ZooB+ t Jz.7 Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC ¢ 1311) If you have any questions regarding this detennination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact BMd Shaver at 9-1"514611 C Basis For Determination water• D Remarks The site was field verliM on 11/23(2oo& M17/2008, Zj1712009 and 3/11/2009 E Appeals Information Olds information applies only to approved Jurisdictional determinations as Indicated in B above) Tlus, conaspbndonce constitutes an approved, jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331 Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address District Engineer Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn Brad Shaver Project Manager Wilmington Regulatory Field Office P O Box 1890 Wilmington North Carolina 28402 1890 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria foi appeal under 33 CM part 3315 and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the MAP Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 2Ib/20o9 * *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the detei initiation in this correspondence'* Corps Regulatory Official 4&J,,. Date Z Expiration Date g/¢/ 142 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Suivey or visit hIIQ, / /wwwsaw.ubace army miVWPTLAN +index hind to complete the survey online Page 2 o1`2 Action ID SAW -2010 00796 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id SAW 2010 -00796 County Onsiow U S G S Quad Jacksonville South NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Property Owner M Mare Corns. Camp Leioune Agent vard lNea., Inc Address Attn. John R Townson, Dire„oor Address Environmental Management Division Suilding 12.1too1g 245, McHugh Boulevard gvftwe rll`4 OS Camp Lelgoge, NC 28541 Telephone No f910145150 Telephone No 716 $49 9419 Property description Size (acres) LM Nearest Town Jacksonvillo Nearest Waterway NO& BLv r River Basin W ri Qak USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates N 35 70M8 W 77 456933 Location description MCAS New River Indicate Which of the Following Aoniy A Preliminary Determination _ Based on preliminary infbrmation there may be wetlands on the above described property We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction To be considered final a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1) B Approved Determination There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property and/or our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps Once verified this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on youf property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be relied upon for u period not to exceed five years i The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official idehtified below on V25/2010 Unless Page i of 4 Action ID SAW 2010 00796 there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington NC at (252) 946 6481 to determine their requirements Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) if you have any questions regarding this determination and /or the Corps regulatory program please contact Richard Spencer at 410 251 -4172 C Basis For Determination O_HWM and 1987 Delineation Manual Wetlands are adjacent to New River, a traditional navigable waters D Remarks E Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B above) This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site if you object to this determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331 Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address District Engineer Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn Richard K Spencer Regulatory Specialist Wilmington Regulatory Division Office 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington North Carolina 28403 1343 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331 5 and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP Should you decide to submit an RFA form it must be received at the above address by December 27, 2010 * *it is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence ** Corps Regulatory Official Richard K Spencer R atory Specialist Date October 28.2010 Expiration Date October 28, 2015 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to do so please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http //re ugulatory usacesurvey com/ to complete the survey online Page 2 of 4 Action YD SAW 2010 00796 a i Applicant US Marine Corps Camp Le eune File Number SAW 2010 00796 Date October 28 2010 Attached is MCAS New River 1016 See Section below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of eriniss►on) A ❑ I PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ermission ) B ❑ I PERMIT DENIAL C APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E S�CIQN � f e fctltow}ng de ttf�,s'� otir gl aid o - 1 ;Te�a�ding rtid��iisbratiiYe'appe�l 0 the 4oye deczsign Additional' mfoi�mation iita �A 9 d tty usace army Y iiUinet/iunctionslcw /oetvr�vo /ref; or 4 Co s` e ulations at 3b 331 A INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or object to the permit • ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions and approved Jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit • OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you may request that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration as indicated in Section B below B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit • APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA NON You may acceptor appeal the approved JD or provide new information • ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD • APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed) by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD Page 3 of 4 Action ID SAW 2010 00796 � � 4'c TI4N i' S R VPB�A :or 3Rt 'rI ?�$ I' REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this form to clarify whet your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record ) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record However you may provide additional information to clam the location of information that is alread in the administrative record -POINT F'C 3 AOFFoR Q�sS�'�D �5)Qlt��k'ow" A' IFIF} 17 µ�� 7r, x � 7 "�� 3 If you have questions regarding this decision and /or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also appeal process you may contact contact Mr Richard K Spencer Regulatory Project Manager Mr Mike Bell Administrative Appeal Review Officer U S Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District CESAD ET CO R Wilmington Regulatory Field Office U S Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division 69 Darlington Avenue 60 Forsyth Street Room 9M 15 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 1343 1 Atlanta Georgia 30303 8801 RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel and any government consultants to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations Date Telephone number Signature of appellant or agent For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Junsdictional Determinations send this form to District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn Richard K Spencer, Regulatory Specialist, Wilmington Regulatory Division Office 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 1343 For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to Division Engineer, Commander, U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn Mr Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD ET CO R 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta Georgia 30303 8801 Page 4 of 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Navy Notice of the Record of Decision for the United States Marine Corps Grow the Force at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps Air Station New River, and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina AGENCY Department of the Navy DOD ACTION Notice of Record of Decision SUMMARY The Department of the Navy (DON) after carefully weighing the operational and environmental consequences of the proposed action announces its decision to implement the permanent incremental increase of Marine Corps personnel at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) New River and MCAS Cherry Point in North Carolina More specifically this action includes 1) new infrastructure construction (e g buildings roads utility lines) 2) demolition and/or upgrades to existing infrastructure and 3) relocating existing units and personnel to consolidate and better support the combat missions All practical means to avoid or minimize environmental impacts from the selected alternative have been adopted FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Grow the Force in North Carolina Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Project Manager Naval Facilities Engineering Command Mid Atlantic Building C Room 3012 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk VA 23508 1278 Telephone 757 322 -4942 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 42 United States Code (U S C ) Section 4332(2)(c) the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500 1508) DON NEPA regulations (32 CFR part 775) and the Marine Corps Environmental Compliance and Protection Manual which is Marine Corps Order (MCO) P5090 2A change 2 the DON announces its decision to implement the permanent incremental increase in personnel at MCB Camp Lejeune MCAS New River and MCAS Cherry Point North Carolina In addition to NEPA and other environmental laws the DON considered applicable executive orders (EO) including the requirements of EO 12898 Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations EO 113045 Environmental Health Risk and Safety Risks to Children EO 11990 Protection of Wetlands and EO 11988 Floodplain Management PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of the proposed action is to provide permanent infrastructure to support the permanent incremental increase in Marine Corps personnel at MCB Camp Lejeune MCAS New River and MCAS Cherry Point North Carolina The need for the proposed action is to allow the U S Marine Corps (USMC) to implement a 2007 Presidential mandate ind Congressional direction to permanently increase overall USM( end strength across its wai fighting organizations by I -iscal Yeat 2011 (FYI 1) PUBLIC 1NVOLVEMP N I The DON initiated a mutual exchange of information through early and open communications with interested groups and individuals on 14 December 2007 with the publication of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare the EIS in the Federal Rego .Nler (72 PR 71128) Three public, seoping meetings were held in North Carolina on 29 30 and 31 January 2008 in Havelock Jacksonville and Holly Ridge respectively Public scoping comments were used to identify public concerns to be analyzed in the Draft EIS A Notice of Availability (NOA) and Notice of PubI1L Hearing for the Draft EIS were published in the Federal Register (77 FR 34754) and local newspapers on 17 July 2009 thus initiating the 45 day comment period The Draft EIS was distributed to various Federal State and local agencies national state and local elected offwials and other interested groups and individuals In addition the EIS was available for review on the public website and at five local libraries Public comment meetings were held in Havelock Jacksonville and Holly Ridge North Carolina on 18 19 and 20 August 2009 respectively and were attended by 48 individuals (including l l agency representatives) Nineteen comments were received from 17 July through I October 2009 All comments were considered and responded to in the Final EIS The Final EIS NOA was published in the Federal Register (74 FR 65773) and local newspapers on l 1 December 2009 The Final ETS was distributed to various Federal State and local agencies national state and local elected officials and other interested groups and individuals In addition the EIS was available for review at five local libraries and on the U S Marine Corps public, website for the proposed action (www growtheforceNC eom) ALTFRNATIVLS CONSIDFRP D The DON identified and evaluated a reasonable range of alternatives (ALT) based on criteria set out in the EIS that would satisfy the U S Marine Corps purpose and need Alternatives considered were identified as ALT 1 through ALT 4 with ALT 1 being the no action alternative The following provides a description of these four alternatives ALT l is the no action alternative Under ALT 1 the permanent incremental increase of Marine Cords personnel at North Carolina Marine Corps Installations would not occur nor would any construction activities related to this proposal be implemented The last quarter for Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 was chosen as the, baseline Since the peisonnel would not be permanently located in this region and no construction would take place this is the environmentally preferred alternative However it does not meet the purpose and need of this action and is incompatible with the President s mandate to increase Marine Corps personnel ALT 2 is the Preferred Alternative Under this alternative the permanent incremental increase of Marine Corps personnel by 9 900 at three North Carolina Marine Corps Installations would occur In addition a multi yeat major construction effort for the infrastructure needed to support this increase would be implemented Under this alternative two types of development and construction projects are evaluated those unique to the permanent increase in Marine Corps personnel and a number of projects known hereaftei as core projects Core projects are 2 infrastructure improvement projects that were already planned and programmed by Marine Corps Planners to support the on going missions at the three Installations Because these projects would occur in the same geographic area and within the same timeframe the USMC elected to conduct NEPA analysis for these projects in the same EIS as the Grow the Force projects ALT 3 proposed the permanent increase of 9 900 personnel associated with Grow the Force without construction of the permanent infrastructure (Grow the Force) projects Marines and associated operations would continue to be accommodated at existing facilities and in temporary and/or relocatable buildings already in place Projects designated as core would be constructed as they are needed to support on going Marine Corps mission related activities and are not tied to the Grow the Force initiative ALT 4 proposed the permanent increase of 9 900 personnel associated with Grow the Force without construction of either the permanent infrastructure (Grow the Force) or core projects Additional personnel would be accommodated at existing facilities and in temporary and/or relocatable buildings however by not implementing Grow the Force or core construction projects Marine Corps capacity to support all Marines would be considerably strained at all three Installations Continued use of temporary and/or relocatable buildings and their consequent replacement would not be cost effective ALT 2 is identified in the Final EIS as the Preferred Alternative as it best meets Marine Corps purpose and need ALT 2 was determined to not conflict with the objectives of applicable Federal State and local agency plans policies and regulations Although ALT 2 will unavoidably impact wetlands coordination with the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) as a cooperating agency and implementation of best management practices and mitigation measures will mimrruze adverse wetland impacts to the fullest extent practicable The USMC considered other alternatives to the Proposed Action These included alternative basing locations phasing of implementation modifying Grow the Force increases and internal reorganization However due to considerable concerns about security connectivity between unit operations unit integrity and the ability to meet the missions the alternatives were determined to be untenable and not carried forward for further analysis Another alternative considered but eliminated from the analysis was the option of only constructing Grow the Force projects to support the proposed increase in personnel and not the core projects However since core projects have already been planned and programmed by the Installations any one or all of them could be implemented regardless of the Grow the Force decision with proper NEPA documentation If this were to occur this alternative would be sinular to or the same as ALT 2 the Preferred Alternative Therefore this alternative would not be considered reasonable and has been eliminated from further consideration ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The DON prepared an EIS to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of each of the alternatives carried forward for analysis Impacts were assessed for the following resource areas land use and coastal zone management recreation and visual resources socioeconomics community services and facilities transportation and traffic utilities and infrastructure hazardous materials toxic 3 substances and hazardous waste noise air quality natural resources earth resources water resources and cultural resources Chapter 3 of the Final EIS provides a discussion of impacts Under the Preferred Alternative (ALT 2 construction of Grow the Force and core projects) there would be no or minor impacts to land use and coastal zone management recreation and visual resources hazardous materials toxic substances and hazardous waste noise earth resources cultural resources and air quality There would be notable impacts to socioeconomics community services and facilities transportation and traffic utilities and infrastructure natural resources and water resources Socioeconomics There would be a population increase at the Installations and within the surrounding communities that would increase the demand for housing utilities community services and recreation facilities This growth would also result in increased annual earnings and economic gain in the region Off Installation it is anticipated that local housing stock should be able to accommodate the increased Marine personnel and their dependents On- Installation housing impacts would be ameliorated with construction of bachelors quarters and where the local housing stock cannot accommodate additional family housing Regionally there would be short term economic gains associated with military construction On Installation there would be no environmental justice (low income and minority populations) impacts Off Installation there could be increased competition for affordable housing between military and non - military families Community Services and Facilities At MCB Camp Lejeune personnel increases would create additional demands for on Installation emergency services and law enforcement and increase the current wait -time for child care facilities Construction of on Installation infrastructure would alleviate the strain on these Installation services Off Installation in Jacksonville North Carolina, there may be an increase in wait time for emergency and law enforcement response In addition if existing expansion plans are not implemented Onslow County school systems may be limited in their ability to provide services resulting in further strain on the School District County plans for constructing additional schools may not alleviate all of the current capacity issues However as additional on- Installation housing is constructed military personnel would likely relocate on Installation from surrounding communities and place their children in on Installation schools thereby alleviating the strain on Onslow County Schools caused by the Grow the Force initiative At MCAS New River the impact to off Installation community services would be similar to those described for MCB Camp Lejeune At MCAS Cherry Point on Installation increases in personnel may increase the wait time for on Installation emergency and law enforcement response No negative impacts to off Installation 4 regional law enforcement emergency and child care community services are anticipated High schools in the Craven County School District may be strained under the Preferred Alternative Transportation and Traffic At MCB Camp Lejeune and MCAS New River impacts to the roadway network would be substantially benefitted from the proposed Base Entry Road (P1382) and Triangle Outpost Gate (P1165) construction Off Installation benefits would occur by relieving congestion on a portion of NC 24 with the new gate and road entry construction In addition as outlined in Section 3 8 of the Final EIS the City of Jacksonville and the USMC are working cooperatively to encourage the use of mass transit as a means to reduce existing and potential future traffic including the possibility of expanding the existing express service provided by Jacksonville Transit and using a Park and Ride system so that persons who are properly credentialed could use an express shuttle service to MCB Camp Lejeune and MCAS New River and surrounding on Base areas Within MCAS Cherry Point beneficial impacts to the traffic network would occur with the realignment of Slocum Road (P134) to avoid the Ordnance Storage Area Roosevelt Boulevard Road Improvements (P177) would also alleviate on Installation congestion especially for outbound traffic in evening peak hours Off Installation traffic along U S Highway 70 and congestion at the Main Gate during morning and evening rush hours would remain unchanged In general as part of its efforts to increase the sustainability of these Installations and meet the goals of Executive Order 13514 the USMC will continue to highlight transportation management strategies and traffic reduction measures as part of its future master planning efforts Utilities and Infrastructure At MCB Camp Lejeune and MCAS New River there are short term capacity issues with respect to electricity and communications however planned Installation infrastructure expansions would address these issues in the long term The projected increase in wastewater discharge for Onslow County (0 912 mgd) would exceed the current available capacity of the county system (approximately 0 292 mgd is available) These capacity concerns could be eliminated through agreements /purchases made by Onslow Water and Sewer Authority (ONWASA) and planned expansions to the Jacksonville Wastewater Treatment Plant With these future changes the increased demand would not adversely impact off Installation wastewater treatment At MCAS Cherry Point an increased demand on utility services on and off Installation would occur However this demand would be met both on and off Installation Natural Resources At MCB Camp Lejeune the Preferred Alternative would result in temporary disturbance to wildlife with smaller less mobile species most likely being permanently displaced during demolition and construction activities In addition development of 1 500 forested acres would permanently remove wildlife habitat these 1 500 acres represent less than two percent of the 95 000 total acres of forest lands on MCB Camp Lejeune The proposed Base Entry Road (P1382/83/84) would traverse forested areas fragmenting wildlife habitat and thus introduce a mortality hazard Construction would temporarily increase turbidity degrading the water quality and affecting some fish species However already established best management practices and actions identified through the Sections 404 and 401 (Clean Water Act) permitting process would lessen these impacts No significant impacts to federally protected species including the red cockaded woodpecker are anticipated Consultation with the U S Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) concluded that the action may affect but not likely to adversely affect manatees during bridge construction Off Installation impacts could occur to natural resources as a result of community infrastructure construction in support of regional growth of the military population At MCAS New River no impacts to protected species would occur Proposed construction would take place mostly in already developed areas with minimal need for vegetation clearance and associated impacts Up to 40 acres of forest would be lost Off Installation impacts would be similar to those presented for MCB Camp Lejeune At MCAS Cherry Point impacts to vegetation wildlife habitat and forested areas would be similar to those described for MCAS New River The majority of the proposed development areas have been previously developed or disturbed however for two of the proposed project sites up to 70 acres of forest would be lost The 70 acres of forest to be developed represent approximately one percent of the total forested acreage at MCAS Cherry Point in addition the forested acreage within the Roosevelt Boulevard project area is along a primary ingress corridor and difficult to manage under traditional forest management practices Off Installation impacts would be similar to those presented at MCB Camp Lejeune Consultation with USFWS concluded that the action may affect but not likely to adversely affect manatees during bridge upgrading Water Resources At MCB Camp Lejeune no increased risks to groundwater contamination would occur Adverse impacts from stormwater runoff are not expected with adherence to existing practices prescribed under the Installation s stormwater management plan As discussed in the Final EIS impacts also will be avoided or minimmzed through implementation of Low Impact Development practices as part of new building construction and use of best management practices to protect water quality Since exact locations for most of the proposed facilities at MCB Camp Lejeune have not been selected and final design is not known exact acreages for wetland disturbance cannot be determined However given current designs and master planning concepts for facility locations up to 125 acres of wetland could be affected (either permanently or temporarily) from proposed facility construction Unavoidable impacts to wetlands or waters of the United States would occur however through the Sections 404 and 401 (Clean Water Act) permitting process with North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) impacts would be avoided or minimized to the fullest extent practicable through siting and design modifications as the design process proceeds Indirect impacts to off Installation waterways could occur due to sedimentation 3 At MCAS New River potential impacts are similar to those described for MCB Camp Lejeune however only 1 acre of wetlands could be impacted and the applicable permitting requirements would be undertaken Indirect impacts to off Installation waterways could occur due to sedimentation At MCAS Cherry Point potential impacts are similar to those described for MCB Camp Lejeune Up to 15 acres of wetlands could be affected Any unavoidable impacts to wetlands or waters of the United States would be minimized and/or mitigated through the Sections 404 and 401 (Clean Water Act) permitting process with North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Indirect impacts to off - Installation waterways could occur due to sedimentation MITIGATION MEASURES For purposes of the Final EIS mitigation measures are defined as measures above and beyond those already required under regulation and the permitting processes Use of North Carolina State regulation best management practices (BMPs) application of activities prescribed in existing natural and cultural resource management plans implementation of construction permit requirements and adherence to state federal and local regulations will continue to apply for the Grow the Force initiative since they are part of existing Marine Corps management actions to minimize impacts Therefore these regulatory and permit avoidance /nunimization/mitigation efforts are not considered as extraordinary mitigation measures requiring additional funding under the Preferred Alternative The USMC has identified potential avoidance minimization and mitigation measures for impacts to wetlands and will continue to use siting and design modifications to further avoid or mmirruze impacts as the design phase progresses The Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank located in the Greater Sandy Run area within Onslow County was built to meet the mitigation needs of the Marine Corps This bank however may not be a feasible option if the governing agencies decide that the type of wetlands being disturbed and the wetlands in the mitigation bank are not in kind (i a estuarine wetlands may be disturbed but the bank may only credit freshwater wetlands) If the bank cannot be used other options will be explored such as purchasing credits from a private nutigation bank or other off site mitigation within the watershed As noted in the discussion of Environmental Impacts above emissions generated from the Preferred Alternative are not projected to impact air quality however as specified in Section 3 12 of the Final EIS the USMC will encourage contractors to follow the recommendations outlined in the EPA s Clean Construction USA program With respect to reduction of fugitive dust the emission analysis included the assumption of 50 percent reduction of fugitive dust due to wetting and additional controls will be supplemented as appropriate by additional measures such as wet suppression wind speed reduction chemical stabilization and early paving of permanent roads to ensure fugitive dust is reduced to the maximum extent possible Specific controls to be used in support of specific project activities will be identified in the respective construction permits Finally in accordance with USMC policy where possible new building construction must achieve a silver level rating under the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification process LEED certified projects provide specific air quality benefits through the use of optimized energy performance and conservation features 7 increased ventilation low pollutant emitting materials in construction (such as adhesives and sealants carpeting etc ) and indoor chemical and pollutant source controls AGENCY COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION U S Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District The USACE Wilmington District is a cooperating agency for this EIS and was consulted regarding Marine Corps compliance with Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act navigable waters and 33 U S Code 9 In addition prior to any ground disturbing activities at all three Installations permits required under Sections 401 and 404 will be finalized U S Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) MCB Camp Lejeune/MCAS New River and MCAS Cherry Point completed informal consultation with USFWS In a letter dated 09 September 2009 the USFWS concurred that the Preferred Alternative may affect but would not likely adversely affect manatees with respect to P1382 (New Base Entry Road MCB Camp Lejeune) and P134 (Slocum Road Realignment MCAS Cherry Point) and red cockaded woodpeckers at MCB Camp Lejeune North Carolina State Agencies The Marine Corps completed Section 106 consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office and they concurred in a letter dated 22 September 2009 that the Preferred Alternative would not result in adverse effects to historic properties at MCB Camp Lejeune The proposed action would have no effect on historic properties at MCAS New River or MCAS Cherry Point All applicable state permits (e g those related to stormwater air quality and water quality) will be completed appropriately to meet state requirements In accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act the Marine Corps determined that the Preferred Alternative was consistent to the maximum extent practicable and submitted coastal consistency determinations to the State and received concurrence from the State on 03 November 2009 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The Preferred Alternative when considered with other past present and reasonably foreseeable future actions would not for the most part result in significant cumulative impacts on the human environment With the implementation of existing best management practices and identified mitigation measures there would be no notable cumulative impacts on land use and coastal zone management recreation and visual resources hazardous materials toxic substances and hazardous wastes noise air quality earth resources or cultural resources Socioeconomics The cumulative impacts to socioeconomics from Marine Corps growth from past present and reasonably foreseeable actions when considered with the personnel increases under the Preferred 0 alternative are interactive with other growth within the region of influence (ROI) and represent an incremental share of the overall regional growth Population growth would also equate to additive economic gains for direct indirect and induced employment and income Additional taxes would accrue to the Federal State (North Carolina) and local governments as a result of this cumulative economic activity These gains would be additive and interactive with other economic activities in the ROI and represent a positive gain for the economy Community Services and Facilities Cumulative impacts from the Preferred Alternative and other growth in the ROI would increase demands on community services and facilities particularly schools The Eastern North Carolina Military Growth Task Force has as one of its goals the development of a plan to alleviate pressures on local school systems Local school districts are also planning and programming for new or expanded facilities and taking actions such as redistricting Almost all Onslow County schools were over capacity during the FY06 baseline school year and enrollment has continued to increase in these schools over the last few years Two new elementary schools opened recently Meadowview Elementary and Stateside Elementary providing space for another 1 342 students This additional capacity alleviated some of the current strain on the school system but with the Grow the Force initiative along with other growth on the Installation the Onslow County School system would continue to have capacity concerns Continued Public Private Venture (PPV) construction of on Base housing at all three Installations would occur and it is anticipated that some families living off Base would move back when housing becomes available Under this program once 500 houses are constructed a new school is built This new school construction along with families moving back on Base would minimize pressure on area schools Transportation and Traffic The impacts to traffic from Marine Corps growth due to the Preferred Alternative would be additive to other growth within the Installations and in the region as well as interactive with ongoing local plans for transportation improvements The cumulative impacts that might result from the relevant past present and reasonably foreseeable future actions both on the Installations or off have the potential to be collectively significant in the ability to support increased traffic along roadway segments of NC 24 and US 17 Information provided by the City of Jacksonville Municipal Planning Office (MPO) noted that NC 24 in the vicinity of MCB Camp Lejeune/MCAS New River occasionally operates at an F rated level of service With an estimated 7 365 additional Marines and civilian personnel expected to reside in Onslow County along with their families cumulative impacts to the transportation network would be expected The City of Jacksonville MPO is preparing an update to its Long Range Transportation Plan that would help identify and prioritize roadway improvements needed in the system The localized reduction of approximately 30 percent of on Base MCB Camp Lejeune/MCAS New River traffic captured by the proposed new interior road would be beneficial but is not likely to benefit the ROI transportation network If existing road improvement plans were not funded and the L`� proposed Base Entry Road were not constructed then cumulatively it is anticipated there would be negative impacts to traffic along segments of NC 24 and 17 With regard to MCAS Cherry Point the improvements proposed for US 70 would be a cumulative benefit to the ROI When considered together the Preferred Alternative on Installation Slocum Road realignment and improvements to Roosevelt Boulevard along with future plans to improve the intersection at Slocum Road and US 70 would alleviate congestion both at the MCAS Cherry Point Main Gate and exiting and entering Slocum Road during peak hours Natural Resources Cumulative impacts to vegetation wildlife and protected species would occur on the Installations due to increased habitat disturbance resulting from population growth additional housing expanded commercial areas and increased number of roads recreational activities pursuit and training The impacts would be dispersed in time and place but would have a collective effect in changing the natural landscape at MCB, Camp Lejeune MCAS New River and MCAS Cherry Point The Preferred Alternative in combination with past actions would result in the loss of nearly 4 000 acres of forest at MCB Camp Lejeune/MCAS New River and about 100 forested acres at MCAS Cherry Point Additional forest would be lost with future projects as well As previously noted there are 95 000 acres of forested land at MCB Camp Lejeune/MCAS New River and 6 500 acres of forested land at MCAS Cherry Point The cumulative loss of forested acreage at each of these installations represents a minor percentage of the total Within the forested acreage cumulative impacts from past present and future actions to red cockaded woodpecker habitat could include loss of up to four existing partitions and one future partition (unoccupied) This loss does not exceed current take limits allowed under a May 2008 Biological Opinion from the USFWS and will not affect MCB Camp Lejeune s ability to meet its recovery goal for the species Estimation of vegetation removal due to off Installation development (i e US 70 improvements and off installation interchange) would be speculative since the Highway is still in the planning process and the interchange would need to be funded It is anticipated that the construction of US 70 would result in some habitat fragmentation that could disrupt wildlife movements migration and possibly divide existing wildlife populations However efforts such as the Onslow Bight Conservation Forum as well as proper land use planning within the surrounding ROI would introduce countervailing factors to offset some of these losses over the long term through preservation of land and growth management Water Resources Cumulative impacts to water resources would occur from population growth and construction activities Secondary impacts from growth in the community would lead to additional wetland removal and stormwater runoff Cumulative impacts to stormwater and groundwater would be 10 minimized \x ith the implementation of best management practices adherence to National Pollutant Discharge Flimination System (NPDES) permit iequirements and North Carolina s Coastal Stoimwater Rules and guidelines established in the stormwater management plan The Prefeired Alternative when considered in combination with the other piojects would result in the greatest potential for imp icts to water resouices because of the laige amount of construction that would occur however thiough adherence to current laws regulations and pernutting iequireinents adverse impacts will be avoided Implementing either of the two other action altei natives would contribute cumulatively to water resources impacts but at lessei varying degiees RI+ SPONSF TO COMMEN I S ON 1 HE FINAL EIS The DON reviews and considers all comments that are ieceived during the 30 day no action period (11 December 2009 through 10 January 2010) following the issuance of the NOA of the Final EIS Only one comment letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was received on the Final EIS Jsummary of the comment and the USMC response follows Comment 1 he EPA comment letter commended the USMC for its inclusion in the Final EIS of potential air quality emission ieduction practices tiansportation management strategies and best management practices to protect water quality in the Final EIS EPA recommended that those specific air quality environmental performance commitments be made a part of the ROD In addition EPA iecommended that the ROD include a commitment to implement transportation system management and transit improvements projects in the future master planning for the base Finally the letter also encouraged further avoidance of wetland impacts as the design phase proceeds Response DON appieciates FPA s comments and has ensured that the ROD reflects the commitments made in the Final EIS with respect to -iir quality transportation and water quality CONCLUSION After careful consideration of the purpose and need for the proposed action the analysis contained in the EIS and comments received on the EIS from Federal State and local agencies non governmental organizations and individual members of the public I have decided to proceed with the Preferred Alternative which provides permanent infrastructure to support the permanent incremental increase of Marine Corps personnel at MCB Camp I.ejeune MCAS New River and MCAS Cherry Point North Carolina The Preferred Alternative best meets the purpose and need of the proposed action and would allow the Marine Corps to implement the 2007 Presidential mandate and Congressional direction to increase USMC end strength by FY 11 JAN 222010 or Date Roger 4 Natsuhara Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations & Environment) 11 I m 76 >1 0 13� bi U) E 0 U- fE Ld O �g z 0 C 0 C) 1-11 C') 0 LJ z 1 1 2 NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET C-006 FOR NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS APPLICABLE TO THIS WORK. 2. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS TRAFFIC CONTROL PHASING SHIFTS 3. SEE SHEET CG-100 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES; CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE; STABILIZATION NOTES; AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. 4. STABILIZE DISTURBED EARTH AREAS WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES EXCEPT FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, AND SLOPES WHICH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. TEMPORARY HORSESHOE SHAPE 2 RIP-RAP APRON #21 CLASS A ROCK DAM - TOP OF SPILLWAY CG -50� SEE OUTLET PROTECTION TABLE EL. 17.00 11_� SHEET CG-505 I BEGIN ORANGE SAFETY FENCE AT STA 42+00 INSTALL AT LOD EGIN TEMPORARY DOUBLE SILT FENCE 40 0 LO + .......... . ...... .......... LOD T-9 bD_ _6 . .. . . ....... ....... ...... .......... ........ . . ------ :j 53 LF CLASS III - 36" RCP SLOPE 0 0.0 0C 42+00 INV. = 12.65 UJI Lij ._-TEMPORARY HORSESHOE SHAPE 3: TEMPORARY ROCK ROCK DAM TOP OF SPILLWAY - SILT CHECK DA . ..... _EL. 16.09 UJI Uj it N Al LLI. . .... fB 12 WEIR EL. 14.00 i— s ! , f ; ` ----- - - - -- ------ --TEMPORARY ROCK SEDIMENT DAM TEMPORARY ROCK SEDIMENT DAM RIP-RAP APRON M STONE OUTLET 00" FLARED END SECTION (FES) aTEMPORARY DROP INLET PROTECTION 7th END ORANGE SAFETY f FENCE AT STA 42+94 INSTALL AT LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TEMPORARY DOUBLE SILT FENCE 1,821,621 SF 41.82 ACRES 2 TEMPORARY HORSESHOE SHAPE CG -50 ROCK DAM - TOP OF SPILLWAY EL. 17.00 Street 3� FES INV EL. 15.84 �_A 3-5011 LO r ROCK PIPE 'INLET r I TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TEMPORARY DIVERSION TEMPORARY SILT DITCH PERMANENT SWALE CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE V SEDIMENT TRAP TEMPORARY ROCK SILT m CHECK DAM PERMANENT swAiJE/. LOD 'CO D A 0- �D <) LOD (n A i !8 LOQ_mmmmrmi��tb@ mmmmm LOD mmmm,011111111 (0. LO ZA own L; :.L I -- - - .."P.. a- \ m C Tp_ LOD .......... . ....... . ...... m —F— --F- -- - ----- ---- T= -F —F ;F -77--3 . . ..... CD a 48 m 47+00 NO2*25'1 O"W 7777s77 �-- Church Street Extension 46+00- — m 45+00 490.34 ..... . . ....... NO - 44+00 i,9- 0 2*25'10 W . . ..... G) 675.35' X 7 - . ... . ........ 8' WEIR ..... . ..... ... . . .... . .--. 18---- EL. 14.00 . ... .. ...... . q= - - 111 - 111 ".1 MMIMWM CIO' V 70 INV. OUT 15.61 RIP -RAP APRON #22 CLASS A e SEE OUTLET PROTECTION TABLE SHEET CG-505 Oil! PERMANENT SWALE A -D.A. 7.44 ACRES 'M 2 WEIR ROCK DAM SPILLWAY 4 EPTH 4.0' MC-TEMPORARY DOUBLE TOP EL. = 14.00 'SILT FENCE BOTTOM EL. = 10.00 0 (SEE SHEET CG-129 FOR DIMENSIONS) j! fil 1 w tqi MvA1,7�,;9,-' FtONO 0 _j SF SF CIO-, Wwwwwom GO-1 BEGIN TEMPORARY DOUBLE SILT FENCE TEMPORARY ROCK SEDIMENT DAM D.A. = 2.56 ACRES 42' X 75', 8' WEIR DEPTH = 4.0' TOP EL. = 14.00 BOTTOM EL. = 10.00 1 1 2 I 3 84 LF CLASS 111 15" RCP SLOPE 0 0.27% A0 SCALE: 1 " = 25' 11 25' 0 25' 75' . . . . . . ................................ .4 v1_ 4�aAQ,4 SEAL 024591 n. 5 9 SEAL 909 MARKET STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 (910) 762-4200 NC LICENSE NO. F-0374 APPROVED IFOR COMMANDER NAVFAC I ACTIVITY SATISFACTORY TO DATE DES DLF jDRw NS CNK ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT TRAP BRANCH MANAGER TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK DAM TYPE B TEMPORARY ROCK SEDIMENT DAM RIP-RAP APRON M STONE OUTLET 00" FLARED END SECTION (FES) aTEMPORARY DROP INLET PROTECTION 7th END ORANGE SAFETY f FENCE AT STA 42+94 INSTALL AT LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TEMPORARY DOUBLE SILT FENCE 1,821,621 SF 41.82 ACRES 2 TEMPORARY HORSESHOE SHAPE CG -50 ROCK DAM - TOP OF SPILLWAY EL. 17.00 Street 3� FES INV EL. 15.84 �_A 3-5011 LO r ROCK PIPE 'INLET r I TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TEMPORARY DIVERSION TEMPORARY SILT DITCH PERMANENT SWALE CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS STORM DRAINAGE PIPE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE V SEDIMENT TRAP TEMPORARY ROCK SILT m CHECK DAM PERMANENT swAiJE/. LOD 'CO D A 0- �D <) LOD (n A i !8 LOQ_mmmmrmi��tb@ mmmmm LOD mmmm,011111111 (0. LO ZA own L; :.L I -- - - .."P.. a- \ m C Tp_ LOD .......... . ....... . ...... m —F— --F- -- - ----- ---- T= -F —F ;F -77--3 . . ..... CD a 48 m 47+00 NO2*25'1 O"W 7777s77 �-- Church Street Extension 46+00- — m 45+00 490.34 ..... . . ....... NO - 44+00 i,9- 0 2*25'10 W . . ..... G) 675.35' X 7 - . ... . ........ 8' WEIR ..... . ..... ... . . .... . .--. 18---- EL. 14.00 . ... .. ...... . q= - - 111 - 111 ".1 MMIMWM CIO' V 70 INV. OUT 15.61 RIP -RAP APRON #22 CLASS A e SEE OUTLET PROTECTION TABLE SHEET CG-505 Oil! PERMANENT SWALE A -D.A. 7.44 ACRES 'M 2 WEIR ROCK DAM SPILLWAY 4 EPTH 4.0' MC-TEMPORARY DOUBLE TOP EL. = 14.00 'SILT FENCE BOTTOM EL. = 10.00 0 (SEE SHEET CG-129 FOR DIMENSIONS) j! fil 1 w tqi MvA1,7�,;9,-' FtONO 0 _j SF SF CIO-, Wwwwwom GO-1 BEGIN TEMPORARY DOUBLE SILT FENCE TEMPORARY ROCK SEDIMENT DAM D.A. = 2.56 ACRES 42' X 75', 8' WEIR DEPTH = 4.0' TOP EL. = 14.00 BOTTOM EL. = 10.00 1 1 2 I 3 84 LF CLASS 111 15" RCP SLOPE 0 0.27% A0 SCALE: 1 " = 25' 11 25' 0 25' 75' . . . . . . ................................ .4 v1_ 4�aAQ,4 SEAL 024591 n. 5 9 SEAL 909 MARKET STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 (910) 762-4200 NC LICENSE NO. F-0374 APPROVED IFOR COMMANDER NAVFAC I ACTIVITY SATISFACTORY TO DATE DES DLF jDRw NS CNK <<PM/DM>> I LLJ (n < BRANCH MANAGER CHIEF ENG/ARCH W <<XX>> 93 A (3 A U) 0 LLJ UJI Z I M LLJ < tal LLj 9 Z 0 v z v w CL 0 0- U D 0:: cn v I w SCALE: 0 z 0 LIN < CONSTR. CONTR. NO. Engineem and Scientists NAVFAC DRAWING NO. W L 0 2 , 20 Old Da, i ry Road UJI 0 SHEET 71 OF 359 Corporate UC041,$UrQLLdp, for Enginsering Servic" C-0686 5 A/E INFO z 0- _j • F_ z • Q z 0 V) 0 w , z X (10 m 0 Of :D m 0 ; I 4. �) I eq 7 I LLJ (n < 4— J " i I r'? P W < m .1�7 L k, - A c!l 0 02 co P 1 _; - -r)p 0 UVR -AIATER W Uj Cm WATER OM, 0:: v I SCALE: AS NOTED EPROJECT NO.: 929223 LIN CONSTR. CONTR. NO. Engineem and Scientists NAVFAC DRAWING NO. L 12608026 2 , 20 Old Da, i ry Road Wikniriqton. NC 284G6 SHEET 71 OF 359 Corporate UC041,$UrQLLdp, for Enginsering Servic" C-0686 5 DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 20 z 0- _j • F_ z • Q z 0 V) 0 w , z X (10 m 0 Of :D m 0 ; I 0 r� 0 Ld V) :D E 0- 00 12 0 Ld 0 n 0 0 B E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CP 3: _0 r Ln 0 0 0 0 N < 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 A 0) C w rn 0 n 1-1 < LL Curtis Road SEE SHEET CG -105 W k it 111,190 01 ~J t'�j i I � i j 1. � , z LI i )-j 1__j < -- ; 1 1 11 _A rYik I+ Qj 0 H H 0 z Curtis Road !I fls SEE SHEET CG-1 05 1+ 0 1 �� i D 1110 ( �`ji4 � rj X U '0 00 li NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET C-006 FOR NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS APPLICABLE TO THIS WORK. 2. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS TRAFFIC CONTROL PHASING SHIFTS 3. SEE SHEET CG-100 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES; CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE; STABILIZATION NOTES; AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. 4. INSTALL CONCRETE TRENCH AND TEMPORARY DIVERSION FROM STATION 3+00 (+/-) TO STAT10N 9+40 (+/-); OUTFALL PIPE 0 STATION 9+50; AND OUTFALL DITCH PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO DIVERT WETLAND SURFACE RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION AREA. 5. STABILIZE DISTURBED EARTH AREAS WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES EXCEPT FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, AND SLOPES WHICH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. PERMANENT SWALE .22 AI • ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 10 IT, I all Iffim 01013 &10 111 19 z a FLARED END SECTION (FES) CATCH BASIN W/ TYPE F GRATE RIM = 22.60 INV OUT = 19.04 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 1,821,621 SF 41.82 ACRES 57 LF CLASS III 15" RCP SLOPE 0 . 47%LODE,, 0 p,-LOID MWORP SF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TDD— TEMPORARY DIVERSION TEMPORARY SILT DITCH PERMANENT SWALE —C—F— CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS STORM DRAINAGE PIPE T Q 1 3i TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION TYPICAL 1 OF 3 —72 LF CLASS 111 15 RCP SLOPE 0 0.47% . .............. . ....... .... . .... . . ..... . ....... 00 D_ A\ V 81 LF CLASS III 15 RCP SLOPE 0 0477a . . .. . ............. ...... . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ......... .. . . ....... . . . . . . . ... . ................... . ...... 2 "C& kG' .... ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P 21 0 C BASIN W/ TYPE E GRATE—" LOD !011 L CATCH B m n RIM 22.60 et INV OUT 19.17 JUNCTION BOX 141 co Ir e\\ m ..... . . . . . . . . .............. W/ MANHOLE ..... . . .... m RIM 23.45 'iB INV IN 18.77 +0 4+00 ' C R� % L `a agaaer"Ra2 SEAL APPROVED FOR COMMANDER I ACTIVITY 909 MARKET STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 (910) 762-4200 NC LICENSE NO. F-0374 ....... ... - ---- - SATISFACTORY TO DATE . .. . ..... . ..... . ... . ..... m - --- - ------------- b . ........... ..... . .. . .... . ....... INV IN - 18.77 S Di DES CHK TEMPORARY DIVERSION STA 4+00.00 m HWINV EL. 19.98 39.00' R' INV OUT 18.77' +I <<PM/DM>> -R STA 5+00.00, 38.0( RIP AP APRON #4 - CLASS A STA 4+00.00, 42.67' R IN W TYPE F GRATE BRANCH MANAGER G-506 SEE OUTLET PROTECTION TABLE CONCRETE TRENCH WITH..... STA 5+00.00, 41.670 R 4 RIM = 21.92 CHIEF ENG/ARCH <<XX>> INV IN = 18.43 SHEET CG-505 TEMPORARY DOUBLE 12" PERFORATED CG-501 CONCRETE TRENCH WITH y HDPE PIPE INV Y INV OUT 18A Im A C A- 'i", Y/ IN w Fa 0 SILT FENCE 19.89 12" PERFORATED 1+0 - ----- 9( HDPE PIPE INV 19.8 ---------- 0 Uj CL OUT 142 LF CLASS 111 (2) 14 - TD C) _ Co RCP ELLIPTICAL PIPE Z Uj TpD,I/r77/ SLOPE @ 0.5% ........ -F >1 z .... Fr S R q 400odmm 100,� SF SF X �0, dog 0- 0 z W 7sr _�Lsp M w 0 j j oo., f U01 SF 001 s C i 5 + 0 CIO, I D 6- 1 0 z 0 0 U) 257 LF - CONCRETE TRENCH 00000% STA 3+00.00, 41. 001 R 4 1 1 1 -1 _ _ 1 00 4 1 -' I I I 1 600000000 G G-,50 C 0 STA 3+00.00, 44.67' R WITH 12" PERFORATED HDPE PIPE 90 \QG-601), 0 TA 6 0 BEGIN CONCRETE TRENCH SLOPE 0.0% -1 1 S 5+ 8.0 47: WITH 12" PERFORATED STA 5+68.00, HDPE PIPE INV 19.89 �END CONCRETI PERMANENT SWALE C HW INV EL. 20.68 WITH 12" PEE BEGIN ORANGE SAFETY FENCE AT HDPE PIPE, INV STA 1+93 INSTALL AT,LOD, uLviii i LivI PORARY SAFE] DOUBLE SILT FENCE S, STA 1+75 INS' SCALE: 1 25' 25' 0 25' 75' 1 1 S I 1 §F 0 D :0 W k it 111,190 01 T z LI )-j 1__j < -- ; 1 1 11 _A rYik I+ Qj 0 H H 0 z Curtis Road x SEE SHEET CG-1 05 li NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET C-006 FOR NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS APPLICABLE TO THIS WORK. 2. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS TRAFFIC CONTROL PHASING SHIFTS 3. SEE SHEET CG-100 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES; CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE; STABILIZATION NOTES; AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. 4. INSTALL CONCRETE TRENCH AND TEMPORARY DIVERSION FROM STATION 3+00 (+/-) TO STAT10N 9+40 (+/-); OUTFALL PIPE 0 STATION 9+50; AND OUTFALL DITCH PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO DIVERT WETLAND SURFACE RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION AREA. 5. STABILIZE DISTURBED EARTH AREAS WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES EXCEPT FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, AND SLOPES WHICH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. PERMANENT SWALE .22 AI • ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 10 IT, I all Iffim 01013 &10 111 19 z a FLARED END SECTION (FES) CATCH BASIN W/ TYPE F GRATE RIM = 22.60 INV OUT = 19.04 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 1,821,621 SF 41.82 ACRES 57 LF CLASS III 15" RCP SLOPE 0 . 47%LODE,, 0 p,-LOID MWORP SF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TDD— TEMPORARY DIVERSION TEMPORARY SILT DITCH PERMANENT SWALE —C—F— CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS STORM DRAINAGE PIPE T Q 1 3i TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION TYPICAL 1 OF 3 —72 LF CLASS 111 15 RCP SLOPE 0 0.47% . .............. . ....... .... . .... . . ..... . ....... 00 D_ A\ V 81 LF CLASS III 15 RCP SLOPE 0 0477a . . .. . ............. ...... . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ......... .. . . ....... . . . . . . . ... . ................... . ...... 2 "C& kG' .... ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P 21 0 C BASIN W/ TYPE E GRATE—" LOD !011 L CATCH B m n RIM 22.60 et INV OUT 19.17 JUNCTION BOX 141 co Ir e\\ m ..... . . . . . . . . .............. W/ MANHOLE ..... . . .... m RIM 23.45 'iB INV IN 18.77 +0 4+00 ' C R� % L `a agaaer"Ra2 SEAL APPROVED FOR COMMANDER I ACTIVITY 909 MARKET STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 (910) 762-4200 NC LICENSE NO. F-0374 ....... ... - ---- - SATISFACTORY TO DATE . .. . ..... . ..... . ... . ..... m - --- - ------------- b . ........... ..... . .. . .... . ....... INV IN - 18.77 S Di DES CHK TEMPORARY DIVERSION STA 4+00.00 m HWINV EL. 19.98 39.00' R' INV OUT 18.77' +I <<PM/DM>> -R STA 5+00.00, 38.0( RIP AP APRON #4 - CLASS A STA 4+00.00, 42.67' R IN W TYPE F GRATE BRANCH MANAGER G-506 SEE OUTLET PROTECTION TABLE CONCRETE TRENCH WITH..... STA 5+00.00, 41.670 R 4 RIM = 21.92 CHIEF ENG/ARCH <<XX>> INV IN = 18.43 SHEET CG-505 TEMPORARY DOUBLE 12" PERFORATED CG-501 CONCRETE TRENCH WITH y HDPE PIPE INV Y INV OUT 18A Im A C A- 'i", Y/ IN w Fa 0 SILT FENCE 19.89 12" PERFORATED 1+0 - ----- 9( HDPE PIPE INV 19.8 ---------- 0 Uj CL OUT 142 LF CLASS 111 (2) 14 - TD C) _ Co RCP ELLIPTICAL PIPE Z Uj TpD,I/r77/ SLOPE @ 0.5% ........ -F >1 z .... Fr S R q 400odmm 100,� SF SF X �0, dog 0- 0 z W 7sr _�Lsp M w 0 j j oo., f U01 SF 001 s C i 5 + 0 CIO, I D 6- 1 0 z 0 0 U) 257 LF - CONCRETE TRENCH 00000% STA 3+00.00, 41. 001 R 4 1 1 1 -1 _ _ 1 00 4 1 -' I I I 1 600000000 G G-,50 C 0 STA 3+00.00, 44.67' R WITH 12" PERFORATED HDPE PIPE 90 \QG-601), 0 TA 6 0 BEGIN CONCRETE TRENCH SLOPE 0.0% -1 1 S 5+ 8.0 47: WITH 12" PERFORATED STA 5+68.00, HDPE PIPE INV 19.89 �END CONCRETI PERMANENT SWALE C HW INV EL. 20.68 WITH 12" PEE BEGIN ORANGE SAFETY FENCE AT HDPE PIPE, INV STA 1+93 INSTALL AT,LOD, uLviii i LivI PORARY SAFE] DOUBLE SILT FENCE S, STA 1+75 INS' SCALE: 1 25' 25' 0 25' 75' 1 1 S I 1 §F 0 D :0 W V 0 °°> z LI < -- U w 0 z W x 0 rj X U Uj Ld V A (f) (n 6 Q_ 0 1 co Uj C\1 a z: QE CL < 0 V VIM SCALE: AS NOTED EPROJECT NO.: 929223 CATLIN CONSTR. CONTR. NO. Engineers and Scientists NAVFAC DRAWING NO. 12608032 22.0 Old Dairy Road Wilmington, INC 28405 SHEET 77 OF 359— DRAY/FORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009 INFO A rw J ) J d j j ) A cl, 0 Li E 0 (.0 C14 O— C14 Lij r- 0 n 3E LO I cn 0 LJ O r / c C) in 0 0 Z LLJ