20120383 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2020_20210204

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20120383 Version* 1
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 02/04/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -2/4/2021
.........................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
I•J Stream r Wetlands r Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matthew Reid [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20120383 Version:*1
Existing ll) Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Middle South Muddy Creek
County: McDowell
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: MSM_93875_MY5_2020.pdf 22.06MB
Rease upload only one R7F of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:*

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Final
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
NCDMS Contract No.: 6783
NCDMS Project No.: 93875
McDowell County, North Carolina
Data Collected: April - November 2020
Date Submitted: January 2021` ., •
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared by:
414'11'11144rf
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville,North Carolina 28801

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

�-� EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
January 28,2021
Matthew Reid
Western Project Manager
NCDENR- Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr.,Suite 102
Re: DMS Draft Monitoring Year 5 Report
Review for the Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Catawba River Basin-CU#03050101
McDowell County, North Carolina
NCEEP Project#93875
Contract No.6783
Mr. Reid,
On January 19,2021, Equinox received comments on the Draft Monitoring Year 5 report for the
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site from DMS. Below are our responses to the DMS
comments: Equinox responses in Red:
1.4. Project Performance
• Please add the following sentences to the end of paragraph 1 of this section: MY5 will be the
final monitoring report submitted for Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project.The
project has successfully met the project performance standards outlined in the approved
Mitigation Plan, and it will be presented for regulatory closeout in 2021.Sentence added.
1.4.1. Vegetation
• Please add that the site was treated for invasives in July 2020 and will continue to be treated
through project closeout. Sentence added.
• The section indicates invasive exotic vegetation totaling 0.03 ac (n=6), but Table 6 and the
CCPV show 0.01 (n=3). Please update. Checked feature calculations and updated text.
Table 2
• Update table to include the invasive treatments that occurred in July2020. Updated Table 2.
Perennial and Intermittent Gauge Graphs
• Please shorten the date axis to only include the 2020 data.This will make it easier for the
reader to review the MY5 data. Updated graphics to depict MY5 data only.
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com

�- EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
Digital Deliverable File Review:
• Please provide the monitoring photos as JPEGS. Uploaded to the support files
• Please include the workbook used to create the longitudinal profile figures. Longitudinal
profile data and graphics checked for continuity and included in the support files as a
separate workbook.
• The hydrology worksheet does not appear to contain the data that was used to produce the
perennial and intermittent gauge figures.Please include these data with final deliverables.Iva
Branch gage data and graphics checked for continuity and included in the Support Files as
separate workbooks.
Regards,
....q5--td L(----,s.
Danvey Walsh
Environmental Scientist
Equinox Environmental
37 Haywood Street,Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com

Contents
1.0 Project Summary 1
1.1. Goals and Objectives 1
1.2. Success Criteria 1
1.3. Project Setting and Background 2
1.4. Project Performance 3
2.0 Methods 5
3.0 References 6
Appendix A General Tables and Figures 8
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data 17
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data 45
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data 55
Appendix E Hydrologic Data 88

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals and Objectives
The following goals were established to guide the restoration process for the project as outlined in the
Final Mitigation Plan:
• Improve local water quality within the restored channel reaches as well as the downstream
watercourses through: (a) the reduction of current channel sediment loads by restoring
appropriately sized channels with stable beds and banks, (b) the reduction of nutrient loads from
adjacent agricultural fields with a restored riparian buffer, and (c) the reduction of water
temperatures provided through shading of the channel by canopy species along with the resultant
increase in oxygen content.
• Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and their
vicinity through: (a)the restoration of appropriate bed form to provide habitat for fish,amphibian,
and benthic species,(b)the restoration of a suitable riparian buffer corridor in order to provide both
vertical and horizontal structure and connectivity with adjacent upland areas,and(c)the restoration
of understory and canopy species in order to provide forage, cover, and nesting for a variety of
mammals,reptiles,and avian species.
• Preclude land disturbing activities including the construction of additional infrastructure, future
mining activities and agricultural practices including cattle grazing and the application of pesticides
and fertilizer within the riparian buffer area by providing a permanent conservation easement.
The following objectives were proposed for accomplishing the above listed goals as outlined in the Final
Mitigation Plan:
• Provide approximately 3,281 stream mitigation units (SMUs)through Priority I and II restoration
of approximately 1,989 linear feet of stream, enhancement of approximately 196 linear feet of
stream, and preservation of approximately 5,836 linear feet of stream threatened by mining
activities.
• Restore natural stable channel morphology and proper sediment transport capacity.
• Create and/or improve bed form diversity and improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate
habitat.
• Construct a floodplain bench that is accessible at the proposed bankfull discharge.
• Improve channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in-stream structures and native bank
vegetation.
• Provide approximately 5.87 acres of riparian buffer restoration by establishing a native forested
and herbaceous riparian buffer plant community with a minimum width of 30 feet from the edge
of the restored channels. This new community will be established in conjunction with the
eradication of any existing exotic and/or undesirable plant species.
• Construct barricades on an existing dirt road network on the Haney Tract to prevent future vehicular
trespassing.
1.2. Success Criteria
1.2.1.Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change,but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable
patterns of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several
months that follow construction and some change/variation subsequent to that period is also to be
expected. However,the observed change should not be unidirectional such that it represents a robust
trend. If some trend is evident,it should be very modest or indicate migration to a stable form.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Dimension -Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as-built cross-
sections. If changes do occur,they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are
associated with increased stability or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable
condition.
Pattern and Profile—Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability whit little
deviation from as-built conditions and established morphological ranges from the restored
stream type. Annual measurements should indicate stable bed form features with little change
from the as-built survey. The pools should maintain their depth with flatter water surface slopes,
while riffles should remain shallower and steeper.
Substrate-Calculated D50 and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed
materials in riffles and finer size class distribution in pools. Generally,it is anticipated that the
bed material will coarsen over time.
Sediment Transport-Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is
effectively managing its sediment load. Point bar and inner berm features,if present, should
develop without excessive encroachment of the channel. Lateral and mid-channel bar features
should typically not be present and if so only in isolated instances. Bar features may be more
prevalent in sand bed channels but should be transient in nature and should occupy no more than
20%of the cross-sectional area.
1.2.2. Surface Water Hydrology
Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of bankfull flows on average every
1 to 2 years. At a minimum,throughout the monitoring period,the surface water stage should achieve
bankfull or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring
years.
1.2.3.Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of five years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum survival
of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems per acre at
the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival is not being met or the
development of detrimental conditions(i.e.,invasive species,diseased vegetation),appropriate corrective
actions will be developed and implemented.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site (MSM)is located in the Catawba River Basin
(NCDWQ sub-basin 03-08-30 and HUC 03050101040020)approximately 9.5 miles southeast of Marion,
NC in southeast McDowell County at latitude 35.5635°N and longitude 81.9249°W. MSM is composed
of two tracts,the Middle South Muddy Creek tract,which encompasses approximately 5.87 acres of
predominately agricultural and forested land,and the 41.05 acre Haney Preservation Tract,which is
predominately forested. The Middle South Muddy Creek Tract consists of portions of three streams,Iva
Branch(462 feet), Sprouse Branch(635 feet),and South Muddy Creek(1,088 feet). The Haney Tract
consists of approximately 5,836 linear feet of stream. The tract is comprised of portions of South Muddy
Creek and approximately four tributaries,including Jackson Branch and Moores Branch. MSM is located
within the Muddy Creek Local Watershed planning area and the Site's watershed was identified as a
Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)in DMS' 2009 Upper Catawba River Basin Restoration Priority report
(RBRP).
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Historic land use at MSM consisted primarily of agriculture,livestock grazing,and mining operations.
Livestock previously had unrestricted access to the majority of the streams on site,resulting in significant
local disturbance to stream banks(Table 4). Additional land use practices,including the maintenance and
removal of riparian vegetation,and the relocating,dredging,and straightening of on-site streams
contributed to the degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics on the site.
During the As-built Baseline Monitoring Report, stream lengths in the Haney Tract were increased by
3,960 LF from the approved Mitigation Plan length of 5,836 LF to a total of 9,796 LF. The increase in
length was due to mapping of streams within the conservation easement during the As-built Baseline
Monitoring field work data collection stage. Upon verification,DMS determined that many of the
included streams have been highly manipulated by past land use (mining)and were not candidates for
preservation credit. These streams(UT1-8 and UT-10)were removed by DMS from credit calculations.
DMS and IRT viewed the remaining streams within the easement(UT9,UT11,Jackson Branch,Moores
Branch and South Muddy Creek). These streams were impacted less by past use and both DMS and IRT
agreed they would be suitable for preservation credit. In lieu of breaking out stream reaches and applying
different ratios for preservation credit based on quality and function,the IRT and DMS agreed that
reverting to the approved Mitigation Plan preservation length assets would be acceptable. The MY2
Monitoring Report has been updated to reflect the change in the preservation assets for the Haney Tract to
5,836 LF at a 5:1 ratio for a total of 1,167 SMUs as found in the Mitigation Plan. The total number of
SMUs for the Middle South Muddy site has also been changed to 3,281 SMUs to reflect the Mitigation
Plan as well.
1.4. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 5 (MY5)data was collected from May to November 2020. Monitoring activities
included visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement,collection of images at 31
permanent photo stations,inventory of five permanent vegetation monitoring plots, surveying of 10 cross-
sections,conducting three pebble counts,and collection of longitudinal profile survey data for
approximately 2,166 linear feet of stream channel. MY5 will be the final monitoring report submitted for
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project. The project has successfully met the project
performance standards outlined in the approved Mitigation Plan,and it will be presented for regulatory
closeout in 2021.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report(formerly Mitigation Plan)and in the
Mitigation Plan(formerly Restoration Plan)documents available on the NCDMS website
(http://portal.NCDEQ.org/web/eep). All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is
available from DMS upon request.
1.4.1.Vegetation
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots (Appendix B —Table 6) indicates that the
herbaceous vegetation is well established throughout the project. Small areas of invasive exotic
vegetation were noted totaling 0.01 acre (n=3). These areas are confined to the lower portion of the site
including Iva Branch. Areas of invasive species were treated in July 2020 and will continue to be treated
through project closeout.
Monitoring of the permanent vegetation plots(n= 5;VP)was completed in October 2020. Summary
tables and photographs associated with MY5 vegetation monitoring are located in Appendix C. MY5
monitoring data indicates that all vegetation plots met the MY3 interim success criteria of 320 planted
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

stems per acre. Planted stem densities among plots ranged from 364 to 607 planted stems per acre with
an annual mean of 453 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 8 species were documented
within the plots. When volunteer stems are included,the mean annual total stems per acre rose to 1,125
and ranged between 364 and 2,185 stems per acre.
1.4.2.Stream Geomorphology
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability,or excessive sedimentation. Sprouse Branch has remained stable throughout
the project. Changes is pool depths and spacing were noted but have remained transient in nature. A
persistent problem area was noted on South Muddy Creek since MY3 and is associated with the structure
at STA 108+83. The exposure of the backer log and filter fabric which resulted in piping through the
structure. The structure has remained stable into MYS,but increased stress on the right bank has resulted
in scouring of the bankfull bench approximately 25 feet downstream(Table 5). Material from the failed
structure on Iva Branch(Station 303+67)has cleared from the riffle at STA 303+75 and has migrated to
Station 304+62(Appendix D: Iva Branch Longitudinal Profile). Problem areas on Iva Branch noted in
the MY3 and MY4 reports remain but have not worsened into MYS.
Geomorphic data for MY5 was collected in November 2020. Summary tables and cross-section data
plots related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. Overall,little change was noted in the
cross-section data between MY4 and MYS. Some shifting of the thalweg were noted in cross-sections 2
and 3,while,only minimal changes in channel dimension were observed in the remaining cross-sections
(Appendix D,Table 1 la/b and cross-sectional overlays). Pebble count data for MY5 was collected in
November 2020. Summary tables and graphics related to pebble counts are located in Appendix D. A
trend of coarsening bed materials has been observed throughout the project and continues into MYS.
Generally, South Muddy Creek longitudinal profile data(Appendix B,Table 11b)indicated relatively
little change in riffle and pool dimensions between MY4 and MYS. The debris jam and subsequent pool
at STA 103+01 has remained stable into MY5 and the pool at XS 6 appears to be reforming. Profile
dimensions for Sprouse Branch changed very little between MY4 and MYS. The overall profile of Iva
remained unchanged from MY4 to MYS. Iva Branch had some surface water present in the channel
upstream of the culvert beginning at STA 302+03. Bankfull and water surface slopes were calculated
based upon the limited observations available on the upper section of Iva Branch.
1.4.3.Stream Hydrology
Since project completion in December 2015,five bankfull events have been documented on South Muddy
Creek and Sprouse Branch and four bankfull events have been documented on Iva Branch. Based on
precipitation data,the suspected dates are February 2nd,2016(MY1),October 23rd,2017(MY2),February
11th,2018 (MY3),October 18th,2018 (MY3),May 9th,2019 (MY4),and February 6,2020(MY5).
Checks of the crest gauges in April of 2020 did not indicate a bankfull event despite new wrack lines and
sediment deposits within the South Muddy Creek reach. Both crest gauges on Sprouse Branch and South
Muddy Creek had been colonized by ants during the summer months. Checks of those gauges during the
November monitoring were unreliable due to the activity of the ants,which had used the cork as material
for building a nest within the crest gauges. No other indication of a bankfull event were noted during the
November site visit.
Two continuous stage recorders were installed during MYO on Iva Branch to document surface flow.
One water level logger was installed in the perennial section and another was installed on the intermittent
section to document 30 consecutive days of flow. The water level logger in the perennial section
recorded continuous surface water flow from January 1,2020 until March 30,2020; a period of 89 days.
The water level logger in the intermittent section did not record evidence of continuous surface flow.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

During the MY5 monitoring year the intermittent section only saw approximately seven days of surface
flow,none of which were consecutive (Appendix E).
2.0 METHODS
The visual assessment of the project was performed at the beginning and end of each monitoring year.
Permanent photo station photos were taken during the initial visual assessment when leaf-off conditions
exist. Additional photos of vegetation or stream problem areas were taken as needed.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon®NPR 332 Total
Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section and profile data were collected in
the field and geo-referenced(NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at
10 cross-sections. Survey data was imported into CAD,ArcGIS®,and Microsoft Excel®for data
processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count as outlined
in Harrelson et al. (1994)and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 5 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring follows
the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation,version 4.2(Lee et al. 2008)and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data
entry tool. In the field,the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of
each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data was reported from the NCCRONOS station SPIN in Spindale,NC. Two crest gauges
are installed on the site,one located on South Muddy Creek and another on Sprouse Branch. Crest
gauges are monitored semi-annually.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 5 Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

3.0 REFERENCES
Equinox Environmental. 2008. Muddy Creek Local Watershed Plan. Report prepared for
North Carolina Depailment of Environment and Natural Resources,Division of Water Quality.
September.
Harrelson,Cheryl,C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins,Colorado
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program(EEP).February 2009.Upper Catawba River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009. https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/PublicFolder/Work%20With/Watershed%20Planners/Upper Catawba RBRP_2009.pdf.
Lee,M.T.,R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts,and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2.http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm;accessed November 2008.
Wolf Creek Engineering. 2012. Final Mitigation Plan Middle South Muddy Creek Restoration.
Prepared for North Carolina Depailinent of Environment and Natural Resources,Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Final Mitigation Plan,Middle South Muddy Restoration,McDowell County.
EEP Project No: 93875
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

��' 1 r
Driving Directions:From Asheville drive earl on 1-40 and lake evil&7. ,; Q i� .�`�
Turn right omo Ashworth Road.after 0,9 miles turn right onto t)S-221. 0 - /
Follow VS-221 for 4-5 miles then tun lett onto Polly Spout Road.After h 2zi
1.7 milts turn left onto Vein Mountain Road.Follow Vein Moimla in Road 0 '� 1
For 2.6 miles and then Lim right onto Bracken•I'own Road.The Middle �-
South Mitigation Site will be on the Intl after about 1 mile. ‘9 - '� /b473
The subject project P c m an environmental restoration silo Of the , _ l i ) ''';•, �i . I
NCDMS and encompassed by a recorded conservation easement.but is ((��
bordered by land with private ownership-Accessing the site may require 1
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore access `
to the genend public is not permitted.Access by rutlenri«,d perso eel of t _
state and federal agencies or their designeotcontmctors involved in the 1R it,. `��
development,oversight and stewardship of the restoration atte Is
permitted within the terms and titneframes of the defined role. Any
intended site'visitation or activity by any person outside of the_ee ' `4i- . — - 'i
•
previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with :._ r
scrrls' As-
Y .• r
'/1„...r?r'.- ' . •'-. .'•ts
�� edvnf k Q � `r; Lr
"M'Iw.- i. ,,,.. .1/4,1 I
\\ "..... LitN:i ' \- ,'''.':::,::.\.„,---.,....„4 .--- ---,,,
1 .. • . ,
if"--•--\-_,---....--..;rfA 7\i 1 / lc 4-'6‘ \
11011!—Ic ,{........i.j-_. 1,....,_,
.1 L , •n �� I Y r
� � ', 160, Middle South Mudd} 1
s1---4":" Mitigation Situ [
\f-
0 1 .)
•'f, �..` I ` 2. te a . ()p �j x
0
rPC () 511rj /.'illkiir i
CCa
1 I ' - ti)r1' i s $ _J-`�f ''-r f.`
.,i, ; —1 /I-0 d ;\\__ ( ._,/ .1„,\( r -Ar=------,....,.._.
. ,
( r '<f__,,, (-,-. -\_,
, . .
, , .-.,-(-)-'cec"\--\----_7) L-='-.,\\ri--..\--\ ,i')L---)
(--,_7 --- f ---- -- P\ em i e:N--.."--- ....." ."- • _..._. ; , L1-1-'-.-V ' ',.\(1
it 0 h ',is t•1.'.----- NI J kiaaa �-4\c",\ji''
- 1,i
-2 \''''? ;....•-\--\\.6 .,-,,,,,, . . ,_/_,, n,
..,:?,.,
_ ,..... ._ . L.....„ ..,
( '�� Roads 1 l :town m:xe , c A i ��$ '
7 '�. Streams + 1 }- J
C
Mitigation Sites • 1111(... ^' �
Figure 1
Middle South Muddy Mitigation Site .•-* Projtot sAe , *�,,
�#,..i m.ag�'s4ti.rlif
> Vicinity Map .- 1:.zitim .s frPi -pm
EQUINOX �‘-4'
0.25 0.5 t IL
Miles

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
L '�Y
. i 300 ,°
1 li
- - 300+50 '
-..- : 34,1,fr. or
•- _ *PP-16
q 30,..„1
Wit
i p it /
.' It" -•.1.,:‘, ., -V / jr ,..
•f l ,y�
•[ a — 302+0i. PP-17
• * XS-8,P IS Middle Sprouse Branch
• - 302+.,
201+74 G 203+51
iff.
w ■ 303+ / ie. '
• ( _ . - iiii. �v �
303+SO ./�� .I /Jr
OP* � Upper,Sprouse
P-19 , V C zo2+SO 2°2+0° .=— 1 PP-2
` Y•C 4. •' - Ad _4- 203, - .^-'
PP
203+ Branch
r 304+0 �
* _.__. .
PP-2()
P.0PO4 1 201+50 e 201+74
XS-10-R % ' Upper,Iva Branch PP 3
304+s,' 5 302+14 G 305+40 204+so 1 •
i. PP- ,
30s+„ P' -21 05+0p , XS-2-R _
•
40/11/ /%* South'Muddy Creek
30s 6
0 101+00 0 210+91 05+50
Lower'Iva Branch / PP-6
3os+„*PP 305+40 a 306+96 po6+o174. XS-'3-P
J
Lower,Sprouse : . I 1
*P 1s— ;
/ 203+51 G 208+04
PP-13
Qe, �` XS-Z=R 20 +00
N PP-14 Xls-6-P *;
I I �i�-: i. - PP-9 '07+5, PP -.
♦ * PP-10 XS-4-R 2
o ♦ o
.-..--.
�`•' *._ ^x o , 20g� _ h .
•
0
SD
00 .. 0 3
00 o -------------------
I o o ��x
Lower,South'Muddy Creek , -- .,
fl0+91 G 112+63 _
•
_ 0- . : 9; - 360
- ' Feet
tt(olAytr- Esrio eE r-,C lrthstar-Geographies, CNE-/Airbus..DS a, Us . illi
y• o o G>�GGu� OG� An.l sis - =
Prepared for '.• Log vane Notes: Prepared by
h �r Hook-Log Run
Easement Vegetation Plots with Hook 1)Baseline Data Provided by Turner Land Surveying
Middle South Muddy T. Cross-Section -Vegetation Plot Criteria Met �����_
Hook Run Log Sill
Stream Restoration Project Long Pro Start/End Stream Problem Areas `
Monitoring Year 5 . � LogSill
Photo Point Crest T�Bank Erosion •
N �1
McDowell County, NC 10 Gauge ill Boulder-Arch no Baffle �411�
�-� Boulder-Arch tS
NiliZ
NCDMS Contract No.: 00006783 Invasive-Exotic Vegetation ,. Brush EQUINOX
• Continuous Stage Recorder .\. with Log
Environmental December 2020 Dense
�'._:Thalweg Present :�•. 1 I Armored Riffle
Quality Sheet 1 of 2 - ='
��Top of Bank Treated
Structure
"...\....,Contour(1 ft)
Failed Structure

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
;:. o
0
o+o t
0
o - 0
.0„,
0
0
UT= _ _ Ilan -
PP . 52+ ra
o •
xoo + * C
•
Sz+oo a °° PP 31 -- _ _ - -
. 51+00
,
50+00
• 49+00 `of hl .
P. DPP-28 ' -
1,8+00 •.
+ a •
i 't 00 °X� 'UT-10 - - �"
Jackson Branch _ o 00
• o °o 0 +
�` xoo F m ,..0 + 4+1. UT-8 r -
�5 m
O O o*PP-2 .
(gyp o
De
o + .- UT-9 m o
��00 (0 0 0 + o , .0+00 + 2+s. _ 0,00
UT-6�
" + +
o0 2+00 hx
..li,y • '.p1'"1 3' $ 3 .` :i +. 4!•;...I., `� �hx o0 0 XOO
C..2,
O
• N.
tr N x% 0-00
. • • .. , ti
,r t 9'' 22 tVW
't;- 0+00
- Sr f/1 t�3- 'x•is i►,15r ,.z• - ' is sla' 21+00 ov+ - rtigS
lv
•• , M f S. y' s. ••� 'ttF 3 r .i'" .�' y ."Trr.. 0
7
4. .. .•R a. ,�. .•�_.• f .■ f • o ter' -. o +0 0 0
r am .•- .�!' O O y—� +• — o
s ' ,' r 4:7.Y- .' { 1, rr -,, 6+00 e o s ._AA — e n v + +o it PP23
1 South Mudd Creek M o+oo
!Y UT-4 y
, .., 5 00 o 0 0 _ o+oo
e r o' 4-00 f ti o UT-2 UT-1
``' -k i y+•s ',+l y.: ! :-. �! '' ' $.1 ,-,
RiMilifrApir: .1: Ati ti R ., 00
_te Ail
+ ':' *,
4 q� f 'P 25. I 250 500 1,00 Si !l'•a g�'' Moores Branch
>i z - :, a 4 . V •, �M F.• • et
f ' Grga s it a @ l IGi PC Gil NAILkQD3 UtD�� utat C nici IGN,and the-GIS er Communiti,NC Center for
•- e .' moo° ° Of�l g Ant lysis •e"' -
I� - Easement Present .-... Log Vane Notes: Prepared by
Prepared for i •
.- ■ Cross-Section Treated ,� Hook-Log Run
with Hook 1)Baseline Data Provided by Turner Land Surveying
Middle South Muddy Long Pro Start/End
Stream Restoration Project ' ° Hook Run Lo Sill
Photo Point �� g
�,a ,
Monitoring Year 5 Crest Gauge �ogr' Log Sill �1
McDowell County, 00 '�-•Preservation Streams Boulder-Arch no Baffle `
�i Top o Bank 8,r•� Boulder-Arch t S � Brush Toe EQUINOX
M NC
NCDMS Contract No.: 00006783 �,Contour(1 ft) ;�: with Log
Environmental December 2020 Failed Structure
Quality r',..:_
Sheet 2 of 2 Invasive-Exotic Vegetation 1 ='!=1 Armored Riffle
Dense

Table 1.Project Mitigation Components and Summation
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland Buffer Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals 2,114 1,167
Project Components
Approach
Restoration Restoration-or- Footage Excluded
Existing Mitigation Mitigation
Project Component-or-Reach ID Stationing/Location Footage or Restoration due to Easement
Footage/Acreage (PI,PII etc.) Ratio Credits
Acreage Equivalent Crossing/Break
South Muddy Creek 101+00—110+91 931 916 R PII 1:1 916 75
Lower South Muddy Creek 110+91—112+63 177 172 R EI 1.5:1 115 -
Upper Sprouse Branch 201+50—201+74 24 24 R EII 2.5:1 10 -
Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch 201+74—208+04 598 611 R PII 1:1 611 19
Upper and Lower Iva Branch 302+14—306+96 471 462 R PI 1:1 462 20
Haney Tract 5,836 5,836 RE Preservation 5:1 1,167 -
Component Summation
Restoration Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland Buffer Upland
Level (linear feet) (acres) (acres) (square feet) (acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 1,989
Enhancement
Enhancement I 172
Enhancement II 24
Creation
Preservation 5,836
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Dements
Element Location Purpose/Function Notes
FB Entire Site Protect Stream Channel
BMP Elements
BR=Bioretention Cell;SF=Sand Filter;SW=Stormwater Wetland;WDP=Wet Detention Pond;DDP=Dry Detention Pond;FS=Filter Strip;S=Grassed Swale;LS=Level Spreader;
NI=Natural Infiltration Area;FB=Forested Buffer
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Data
Collection Completion
Activity or Report Complete or Delivery
Mitigation Plan Feb- 2012 Mar- 2012
Final Design- Construction Plans N/A Nov- 2012
Construction N/A Dec - 2015
Permanent Seed Mix Applied - Mar- 2016
Live Stake Plantings - Mar- 2016
Baseline Monitoring Document(Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline) May - 2016 June -2016
Year 1 Monitoring Dec - 2016 Jan- 2017
Year 1 Geomorphology Monitoring Dec - 2016 Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring Oct- 2016 Year 2 Monitoring Oct- 2017 Nov- 2017
Year 2 Geomorphology Monitoring June - 2017 Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring Sept- 2017 Year 3 Monitoring Report Nov- 2018 Nov- 2018
Year 3 Vegetation Monitoring Sept- 2018 Year 3 Geomorphology Monitoring Oct- 2018 Year 3 Monitoring Report - Nov- 2018
Year 4 Invasive vegetation treatment - Jul-2019
Year 4 Invasive vegetation secondary treatment - Oct-2019
Year 4 Monitoring Oct- 2019 Dec- 2019
Year 5 Invasive vegetation treatment - July-2020
Year 5 Vegetation Monitoring Oct- 2020 Year 5 Geomorphology Monitoring Nov- 2020
Year 5 Monitoring Report - Dec - 2020
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 3. Project Contacts
Middle South Muddy Stream Re storation Site
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
217 W Jones Street Suite 3000a
Prime Contractor
Raleigh,North Carolina 27603
Matthew Reid(828)231-7812
Wolf Creek Engineering
121/2 Wall Street Suite C
Designer
Asheville,North Carolina 28801
S.Grant Ginn(828)449-1930
River Works,Inc
Construction 6105 Chapel Hill Road
Contractor Raleigh,North Carolina 27607
Jon Harrell(919)710-3326
River Works,Inc
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Seeding Contractor
Raleigh,North Carolina 27607
Jon Harrell(919)710-3326
River Works,Inc
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Planting Contractor
Raleigh,North Carolina 27607
Jon Harrell(919)710-3326
Turner Land Surveying
3719 Benson Drive
As-built Surveys
Raleigh,North Carolina 27609
David Turner(919)827-0745
Green Resource
5204 Highreen Court
Seeding Mix Source
Colfax,North Carolina 27235
[phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery
797 Helton Creek Road
Live Stakes
Lansing,North Carolina
[phone]
Equinox Environmental
Monitoring Performers 37 Haywood St.
- Asheville,North Carolina 28801
2016 016-20202020
Danvey Walsh(828)253-6856
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 4.Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Project Information
Project Name Middle South Muddy Creek
County McDowell
Project Area(acres) 5.87
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 35.5635°N,81.9249°W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Blue Ridge
River Basin Catawba River
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit I 3050101 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit I 03050101040020
DWR Sub-basin 03-08-30
Project Drainage Area(acres) 2,893
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area >1%
CGIA L and Use Classification 2.03.01.01
Reach Summary Information
Parameters South Muddy Creek Iva Branch Sprouse Branch
Length of reach(linear feet) 1,108 471 622
Valley classification(Rosgen) Valley Type VIIIb Valley Type II Valley Type II
Drainage area(acres) 3,002 27 29
NCDWQ stream identification score 44 31 34
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C C C
Morphological Description(stream type)(Rosgen) G4 G5 G5
Evolutionary trend(Rosgen) F4 G5 G5
Underlying mapped soils Iotla,Hayesville Clay Iotla,Hayesville Clay Iotla,Hayesville Clay
Drainage class Poorly drained Poorly drained Poorly drained
Soil Hydric status Non-hydric Non-hydric Non-hydric
Slope 0.40% 4.60% 2.20%
FEMA classification Limited Detail N/A N/A
Native vegetation community Agricultural Agricultural Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation <1% <1% <1%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetland! Wetland 2 Wetland 3
Size of Wetland(acres) - - -
Wetland Type(non-riparian,riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine) - - -
Mapped Soil Series - - -
Drainage class - - -
Soil Hydric Status - - -
Source of Hydrology _ _ _
Hydrologic Impairment _ _ _
Native vegetation community _ _ _
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation _ _ _
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States—Section 404 Yes Yes NW 27
(2011-02233)
Waters of the United States—Section 401 Yes Yes 401 Certification
(DWR#12-0383)
Endangered Species Act No N/A ERTR
Historic Preservation Act No N/A ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMAF Coastal Area Management Act(C AMA) No N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes Yes Case#:
14-04-0367R
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A
N—
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 5 Cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project-Iva Branch
Assessed Length 462 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub Category Performing As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bed 1.Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0 0 100%
1.Vertical Stability deflect flow laterally(not to include point bars).
(Riffle and Run Units)
2.Degradation-Evidence of downcutting. 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate. 9 9 100%
1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean BankfullDepth>1.6). 9 9 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 9 9 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run). 9 9 100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend(Glide). 9 9 100%
2.Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1. Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse. 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3.Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 9 10 90%
Structure s
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 9 10 90%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 9 10 90%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection 9 10 90%
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining-Max Pool Depth:Mean
4. Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 10 10 100%
base-flow.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project — Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 5 Cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project-Sprouse Branch
Assessed Length 611 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub Category Performing As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bed 1.Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0 0 100%
1.Vertical Stability deflect flow laterally(not to include point bars).
(Riffle and Run Units)
2.Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate. 14 14 100%
1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6). 16 16 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 16 16 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run). 16 16 100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend(Glide). 16 16 100%
2.Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth °
1. S coured/Eroding 0 0 100% 0 0 100/u
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping calving,or collapse. 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
3.Engineered o
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 18 18 100%
Structure s
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 18 18 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection 18 18 100%
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining-Max Pool Depth:Mean
4. Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 18 18 100%
base-flow.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project — Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site -South Muddy Creek
Assessed Length 1,088 feet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number Total Number of Amount of % Stable, with with for
Major Channel Channel Metric Stable, Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category Sub Category Performing As-built Segments Footage as Intended Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1.Bed 1.Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly 0 0 100%
1.Vertical Stability deflect flow laterally(not to include point bars).
(Riffle and Run Units)
2.Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate. 5 5 100%
1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean BankfullDepth>1.6). 5 5 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 5 5 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run). 5 5 100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend(Glide). 5 5 100%
2.Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth 0
1. S coured/Eroding 1 11 99% 0 0 99/u
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse. 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
Totals 1 11 99% 0 0 99%
3.Engineered °
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 5 5 100%
Structure s
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 5 80%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection 5 5 100%
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining-Max Pool Depth:Mean
4. Habitat Bankfull Depth Ratio>1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at 5 5 100%
base-flow.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Planted Acreage: 5.87
Number of Combined % of
Vegetation Category Definitions CCPV Depiction Planted
Polygons Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. N/A 0 0.00 0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, °
2. Low Stem Density Areas N/A 0 0.00 0%
4,or 5 stem count criteria.
Totals 0 0.00 0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small °
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor N/A 0 0.00 0%
given the monitoring year.
I Cumulative Totals 0 0.00 0%
Easement Acreage: 5.87
of
Vegetation Category Definitions CCPV Depiction Number of Combined Easement
Polygons Acreage
Acreage
■ ■
4. Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons at map scale). Cross Hatch 3 0.01 <1%
(Red-Dense/Yellow-Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons at map scale). N/A 0 0.00 0%
N/A-Item does not apply.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

•
,� 14 rnAy _ r* ", 8 c
`�.. s} y , - we ;
S y -
r r4 f j
{'. /J
. • -' •,��b ..a -
�a 'Cx y�l rp� � mac.
i,
�/ y� q� Y �• � y . fJIIJ,Tc .'Ly a! F.%„�' y p 1'I l� H yr - Xd a 5
( ✓ a : ,, r
` ; .. �' �
x ( x » /.
(i,
uta�' +7 '�s`� - Zvi
� , , 04-24-2020,
IN
Upper Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 1
Looking Downstream
k
Y f "�fa� rah,�' y , �
.b-4 ' - eii `p f p .� <
,
'.a
yy I.
04-24-2020
rr C
Upper Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Downstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project N5o.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

, ,q.,,,,..,01-Cgr .' ?' 4'. A', 1,{,..4,1414-_es-'..,f--kAtp f',40,,e, ,
.*;„*,,t4' iftR...".4,'''%:•41,1
44 1
r r. 1i' rih 4` b 47'- r''-'1"ii.t414,,rf," *:14 :P;;:k/.:e.1
tk,a;v0,7' *TiV,.., .44.4,'",'.44'1:..pir,'\t i. , , ',,,",,T,':',;,,.1`"J' - .C'
v,:v Irlft, ,,,...
4,4
. \ 9, � X-!„ n�'It ",d`.,,;;;;•,-,,,midtd,f' •'-;,14k,i1.:' ' -,. i‘i` df..„--*....4-4,z1,',i47'. ',4',—,0,.- A, .. t 9 $� y 't F e/µ'� {� i" r *f}'A « yYµ '
h 1` �� e n'&e +-} JI moo{[ °i. ti" +�
...; .,.tt.1.-,:;,„ -:...-- 4-„w421 ,,,,„ ,-..--)v-;.1,,i,,,It.,, ,_',
'� r' • .ft. 3'�!,.;-‘,. .-4". 'r'AK� AP,� ;� P '''''.1. i 6. T ,-4
.;11
�3' WSr'A . y r ," S ;f
Y�`r„� ��,S'3",,3 � Ix & ��vs� .o � � A•I - ."�,,�-?p ;Ay'��� �
wife.0=-'k �"E> _ y r it id,: g� � .-�, _ Y, :-.a4�r $ �l'Fi i �yr6 -°.'='; .
4 .
I--
'44--,----- L s' rGPC;- -C , ,1 « j"E • a,a'. +h 4I �f- er t, t,- s it"
_ '� a�'��r eta rG:�O� � r � mo'. �6���sy ,,pnE� „ ,��
ililun
` < '.�'; ���$7`It�fffp...� F�i�l��l Hai! ,�i�� yl,� � ..dl" .an...II
} i�T ��'L fNy
S h 4 '� l `��"A��'��4 � ,{�'I E s"�. J'� -§ri•�.a if•4�,yy � k I� '1,1 yu ff�'4 ,:1..Yi.
♦ - 4 �• �` i '1U A fl 1k1 ,I E A: a k � h
� Y Y X a f�Lq� ��5��� 'f.7�i��� � t k-_ ATyP � �,tyS- .,
gr, '. N V�+'W}�'��',:N° a'wr a��{��!/,Y �P� � �f' �iI eeYY � t� ��©L V, p� y
a h0 `"._^`, � : r 1,41' �r r. ,u�J� �.=�i `I" ..,. ,�.�'�,� 1� r ��2` xe �:..:�� LL'�
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 1
- .:. ,,, :tkie-A,:. -A ..,:t4;,501 4,.,p '''t4--
- '�-`,..._.v.-.-. ---w'.,---I't,;. ''' , '-`1" .z 1:)''.7";.‘ .•; -41ge-,,*
,47-
ta"
A 4,
otp4
„„),
;.� / ,t d at« 7t - �a gL,�" 'q ': ` 7« C x mil, �,4 a 7A :-'4 •
f ,� �6 ti 4,1
' — ' %-tgit..'' . .i#._ ,,,-.,,, 06
' fi.t1C:,."',7i,A4:011
p J'
„, ....,,...i.,,..L:;,,,s1,4„.. . ,.4.„,*-'-''', .
t
A
- ;•i" 3:2 T sa Sa�t:[I?FoL �iss.;§{'s ..Rc1...
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Downstream,Northwest- 292 degrees
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

-.',. r
I.
- - ..t1 - - 'tom. - -�
v y
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Upstream; South 182 degrees
r' .-,4.SAW,,,4iiWt,,,. '',i,:t.r,,,,,ilmt:iiii,:i:,!11 , \
,*
a £ 19 z, � 1 ' f I' v fir •711, ;,
•
AT `1 E �'x�� u ,- ;.r y7 4 4/' 4 '�‘ r V f .. `te r.
a - a 1 l. 4�fi 'eat�6 '- l .
A,?f.
s,Y . , p c r1 M. " .' °,yam -
- -
si
ate. I
s
R 1 s' C.2L''4_Cr} f.
- ', r % -
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 2
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

i � r� :� v
4 At
'.-,, )),- {h L Ada ' ..
:.; c .'f',_,,'.., ..,-. .....,:-..,, - ..,—..,.:,.:-.-.,--..„:,.,,.,,. .,..,..,,,_ ,
.,4,.,... ..,....,, 7.... - R. .„:....- ...,, ,..-,.:........,...,-„,,,..,...,. ,,,:.
' ''\.. - .',1:'-
u1
......,,..:,..,.
.,,, „..J.::,,,,:-....,..;,,,e.i,
vf� ,�`' >� ,.k " d sc : era ; � ry
.-„,":.'c':,.'1':',"';';',:.'-17:i.:'-'-..-7--.4":.. ,-,:i.:''8,-..Z-
''. ''''':/i':':.-C..:-.:;::4'.4i-..?1';';2:1; -.-4-'-i.*-'1.-%1:.:0:''';:1::7-::;;:ti?''1:';4-:i.:::. .44:1'''':-H-5:::::'''.7f.::71-:•.-;....'-1:-..—.--,.:7--:,...A,I.7-'':\
a�.�Y P
Fa:::_;'_-,,,...,:::',,.. .H.'7;,_"'',...t,Skl."..'''..v,.,,:..E", ...it,:i.,...::::,:,,,...;1,:11:::;.:;it..:::,..,.:I'.:,:''''1'.-..---,. -.f.t.,-;:11'.
,n 9P ' 4q_'tl 'mi 7 - .
.'..--.7:::A.;.::..'`):'' 4-'i'2'12.''.C:ir,.,..'.27°:...11.,..
Y1
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 3
* „is_
.„#,
` Y
`'� C k, 3 f� P r�'Ri 'd b 1 � A
-,:,:-,.-,.7:-;_ai .:..:. ._... :
,.. ,„...,:ii:::v:...,,,,,,A,,„:.,... .::,.... .: ,...,
,04, It,
f
i �;. r ailwr.:0
� v as �4igti,
44:40:
41
'�� ,.1� � - � yam y � -..7,-.......,-....:::.._: � � ��
SSil � � �'fg'r -r"�._ �` ter= 1
� M
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Upstream from Crossing
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

lEY I
WT. :y.ice
AR-
}
04-
Lower Sprouse Branch—Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 101+50 - Looking Upstream at Confluence with South Muddy
s A -
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 101+50 - Looking Downstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

•
1 '.. 'e-\ IL b
it., 11
q i' pis- 33 a• i rv.i Sc. .14
a rt 1 v PT A. ,'.s�^,. s ;II!I9i !M
,,,..4.%.0..,,3fs,1,1,,',7, „.7i,•:;;;(,,_ - s ..„.-,z.„... ....',..----,,----01.4, ,'. i..:' .5., ,.'''''',40,, ,. i.7'.`".-.-4:,w''',.',/,'-'?..-ii,.*i!',',,,,,4--'''
..!;:/'-,:,-•-iii,ft..ff'''',',A4k-riviE(.-7.., ,;,''.•-, ..v,„.,p„,t,,,.,,,„L.7.;:_k- '` .''''- '''`',44,41,.., -',`:'-.7''''-44,-'''''.4•.!•=#-.?'-f-P;34,:. .,,..?
._-. 'E r"`__,e. ram
c
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 101+50 - Looking Upstream
x. 3 ?u. ..
i� r 6 ,
'-t.,_,,:4V;-",' '''..---,-.-.-,,,,..-'1,'L,.., -*r,----.1.":-..-- -- -------- -.'"---r-- Akm,i,-. , ;
e' .v i .,'"` "tea!
r -,
i
� Y I 1 �� '{ '
fl , timstatit. 04-24-2020
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 102+75 - Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 4
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

" t a 4'J.' y 9 L': a '�.:,
err-i.
•
•
•
•
•
�f a ty
tt
1
} .Y4.ffiiRw _- 4 Z} '. e. ç
# . i1 ... nv
1 1 ��• 15 yy;l" e
ate, .FZ'i5:.r
e
a � `t',, • • o ,.cam '# `� R �
4y' � a .+ •
—
• 04=2.4 �020
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 104+75 - Looking Upstream from Bridge
i ,. t '
•
•
—.
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 104+75 - Looking Downstream from Bridge
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

r
�s t ty, ,kl:giYi�'��. ¢r
t hY
b _ - _ tom..
,�
S
s
•
South Muy Cek e Phot
Station 107+45dd- Looking—Perman Downstreantm at coross-SectionStation11 5
,K
x a + .•v +
4 . h ;?lea
. ,
.,
,.
_ _. _ .._
___ _. , .. _
_ ..„-_____-.
_„-_,__„,--..- -. -..-..„„_._..„.„:-.„...- _ .
-_,_.-=...-,,,-,:.. .„.:„.......: .
_:-_ — _,-,„„_,:___,-______ , _.......„..„.....„..... ...— .
.ss; ,- ___ ..._. _ ._:.. _ :.......„_, __
_ _............,....7,____ .„.„...,....,.,_ ....,. . .
- .-----.,-,,,.., - _ --_-.77,_,...---::=-- .. „_.....4:.:,-..„ .
.._..
...... ,.._.
y_„__...... _ ..,.. ,
04_- 4 20 F2
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 12
Station 108+58- Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 6
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

ak A dbj��jf �{4 �y6
ve.
1.
1 ✓ M
�i
-ter
a!a" r
'� (, " .. :- -4 w2r
South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 109+58 - Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 7
l'ill'Ilt.4**447 101 „.,;.".4t1 ,,,,, %* ,.- + ._.. _,,.i,=, ''', -;7141-?1,,,.
47 a�#
. ..4111. .-`' '-'.',-;.-, .: ,- ', z:,:':, ' 4r. - ,111, ,,,,,,40.0...:_r,..„,.., ,.,, ,
- 6,-- •51-orN* '',..f-, ' '.i., ''',...4,. ,
F
'ii
-
•
- _ _ -
_-_,;--_, ..7- ;—
L"gym
n
Lower South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 111+20 - Looking Upstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

J • � a `3� ,�. - .3 -..xs�,4-'Wit_.
WITAI Ak*tt':271.4:7:':- r -7i4S-'14tii: ''''4tr'1
. ems.
�P�' y' 4��,
;' rt" s
n
„ �
l; �
-r =
.y.. � ER � T ��o _ •� _i
sa
. - <5 Y tip;� R
Lower South Muddy Cane Photo Station 14
Station 111+20reek nt- Looki—Permng Downstream
IR
Li.
a4,v=w F y
s # rye. J'
y
a
- fw" - _
Lower Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 111+20 - Looking Upstream from Confluence
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

y "ems.p r • z
�,' y' r '
'''':;.'.:,4..:..:;;-.i.,f'.,.,2',,3:,;.'•.,.,---......•.."-::. pfL.':'...-ti'-
f:.---.744.4. ,-h••-:':!::LO- .-..L.41-;:i --1. :rei
7 rf - ,:'. fit' 1S 0 , €
f- 7_a".i t q"' ..W 4 2 .4- : ' y -"'ram A- - ,!4a K 1-, Y ,M
'.,.,',,4•.4.:,.'-7.:,,-.'t.''":,:t*W.'',tz„'.':1::';!::-!•.e,..:i,.T.,..-r:,%.-_-':-_I•-.„i--1-•!1;.,:,,V;',1.-.'':7:•i.:5!7...:);;7"';„-.4r2:,:-:::-:.j-c,-.if,.;:+-Tr:.:C.,;'‘1:.•:..:......•--'..!-t".,•,`--'.7,.•-:.'•.•:.r.•_,-:.,.-'--_--':,;,._-...>.,f'.:.
mac' w !,
•:-:,.,.'.,f--.,_..'
Fes.: - - 1
l
04-24-2020-
Lower South Muddy Creek—Permanent Photo Station 15
Station 112+62 - Looking Upstream
ai r a, �°' ?�' S{ 4 i 'a S `-' u 1 f.
fiet;
3�t!X ik�lZ �k ,lti. � F vt r"e Tara-+fitly� 4 'fl''' #
�}- 4<u s tax s " al . a s l; ' a�
i t ���,r- "s � � �L ^� � " 3� �� .iy �' �' -- ,
a•$ -e; ! -,`.'' f"' of k.f rii a fr-
r" • s € �€ } -r b '_ plb
{ ' "P� SV? 't l Y!M rK Fr' � FA „� 5 3'§`I'2''p '1' klor .y�hY k 5 eft
4 el 4
b 5 Qr } ��'w'y Ii,J i k ad ��+x�P 4 4
�'..� ' 9 r� -.T ,sT 1?N 'r 4s ';'.,•4.,f-.k `"t..- -b�- iL: -4 N �:,�� -
Y - e >rr4. - ? a ag�. i
l 1 tit ' k a zS e ��1 �" N 1 :r. �f . C ". i`I
a e d 1PM fl (. - *.� a 7"t TA n r + 'A \`�}1 r P" a .v#r•,l' k,r d
, ? q ��A!', :'�1 al p ): W: s
��, n� are �' �� � .� �r ,'.' `,�,,' ! 'I �a,��� oaf -!,.
:::.,,,..
4` }f a its �`�� 5r '.
.„..,▪ ,,zi,....44,..,"7:. :, .,:::..
":-.:'; P lip., ,ram ' �d+s 9r `£ - r r.1� +�:' ., to YT ▪� ,ak ♦ � !>. r
i.
Upper Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 16
Station 300+50 - Looking Downstream
Middle South Muddy Stream restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

`'bk`L'^' w�'` @ _ #` r r`,r- z a-,,.1iy5° XO4'` xR ,
.41
4 as v ie
+ � : � f x s t h TiT1•
4,40 Ilk , (,. ' ` d ' Y, :rc�, I c' 'g 4b r •
e wA
2 •, ,.‘,"/-*Alc,„ ' * ,,r'...ii'..'... ,,3.';.K., 4,4,0,„....,1,.-IrtVk.,- ..,.,."-,01,4,1 , ." '.`4 1,.0. - .:' '. .
'•- $i tin S^ ' _ r r• a
� 2 e a r �e
.4.*
r fi y" kr n'.. r,n'vt 1. r'x " v .A.
`'^ ,,_�, �k ti,¢ 's v - ,. 'I r,)s„:„�ds?'L �,/st y S 'kin t
,..,,'.'","' ..'''' / 1
�1-,• P ,, x 4„„ r F t' r fY� ♦ '• v F
,,;,.4"iio: 7:,,,t, : ._,...,,,,,,,, tt...,;.,,e0,..,::-.47,,0 .:1—';" —— -,i'S'',
iitt
P a '04=24-2b
Upper Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 17
Station 302+13 - Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 8
E. 1....er.i.r,7A i*;:cop,A1‘....,2.. ..7 ;' ,' ,,,,•, jOr. .. ..,.....„ - ...,,,,, _
S 4 ^
/' t}�.
yam'.
t.
�9yafi.•:es.AR blrto i e'�• � �etm it•
f " 4
k s 0 n. a,'
t 3 cC'a J K V . �i 4 "4•: t Q
i,-1,-,. '''''.V:r• kl:t-,;,.404::-t, p r,„ .,),„!,,,.,..,,,c,„,..4,,,,--s-7, ,-.- - ,'. ht ot: e. . -;,--;,,,,,T., '-1
1r
�'ac re kr . � � f 1 .
``""ii gg d "
t,,i,, 1..o "C CF„q ,,I4 r 7 N4 g .. 'a.. A l a ew a/.� ® 24-20
Upper Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 18
Station 302+82 - Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 9
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

, - T.744t r:;'° ifniii .j: ' t'' ,;s‘.7.--'-'1:::'-'- :3,..,‘' :S-''',:, : ' ,,''-,A':.2%,' ‘,-,: ,,,,,#.
Yi s / 1 - n
.tip 3` f I 2 � -;? r
V S
r
1-' .1--:1::1:1.-'' ''i',H,I.'.„
ti_
Upper Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 19
Station 303+75 - Looking Upstream
iii
� � �'����� �� � �, shed'��° �' !'+' �i i � �`��� ` �`��.
q ✓ :-I �. ry ie 1,04 G�f. d 2' y
p t I
�+ �
,7r� � � a a � � � �� 'fir � �i � jr
/ i yt Fr
�.. 1, e, , ;�s / r < / `
' Ur i / / r • -
i' i l r
r �'
� fi
::._ . :2,-, ,,,,:; .,446:--,.. ,=.,-: .....3,0.;-,,,: :41101.,:-A> 4
�.: 'y sae"a
t
e
w - � '����: K;,sub. 4h:;� �1►:z o,�p�:� u
"__ �.� 1" �`�G� .-fie � l�
Upper Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 20
Station 304+20 - Looking Downstream at Cross-Section 10
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

:., . - .,...4 IT4......v..,,. .„1,..,,,,'
W,, 7 4� • m +E-'0lY"fir
•
. •._..... --,_. ... , ,.::,..:.-.,-..'-•, *i:.,-,_•...,..,:i. ,,..41-...44,1V - ._ ..q• . --,,p',,-. 4:1'4111,4 ''
\„:„.:%.41,,,;.,,,,,40m;:74.-:-itiverkler,v,„..4,...,,,,,„..,.. . ,_, , , . .. . . -__.,
.,
t T }� I t. "�Sy,'+ 1 is
tit' . �.Le ,Q° "! 4 t Z;g>Y �,4-�,
7... i i .
Upper Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 21
Station 305+10 - Looking Upstream
4 Y py
yyI �{e i L I Mt. i
l µ
ilk,
�" : sue" �,
''"�,,i,sealvfm.-U.VP,' -., -?0,t\-:., . , ' ,...''.,,:::.t;;.,..:1-- ,..,CIL;';''' .' -..4-. . ..,...-,,,,,.:,,i...,.. _0
y� 1r ss�
k �
S -
try .1 ,
Lower Iva Branch—Permanent Photo Station 22
Station 305+85 - Looking Upstream from Crossing
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Repo
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020rt

.k .. a .`g ° x '� `` s '04- z K.pF- {,
'.,:',, #r .'', -III''5"...!--,,,,-.. ii,(.--v,-.,.,t.,4 t'.,
di
x � � � I
,'�3 c e¢ �i- � t t' ¢° sal k4+.F'-,,,,, .,„„ y�q 3b•$
:'" ' i'PI' *94 ,41,i1,54Z`.','''::::-irk,Nit . '-'0.0i .., -4,4;1;5:0'4'‘,, -71'''` .,,,, 4 -7),-4.A
1 7� -.'.dh' &„der SST `;t r X ih;4� y ..*7 .4
R 9 p - 4 "4M ''�
VII. t
�' his a � � �.' � > �"A{if d� ,� .el �, fit:' y �1
1, t
af. �
I � '
»mac; -
^ " k
Haney Tract—Permane Photo t
Looking Downstream South MudStady Creekion23
y:
3� £ -• 3 4. n l'. ¢`' ay -
� [ - ° �`�� Sri --
•
,. a
fir' a..-- __ ' --- - --5 ,--_-....,0-z.:„..,„,- -. --1_,.-, ,. --,-. . ip.,,,I....., . _ _ .
*
. Az
r
S I. r y_
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 24
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

•
z x �° d r ''� try . ,a
,.', Ik-;;•1„,-.-- •-`' '`,,„,..,;.,.--,1 'it---' .,;-*i-,-, d' 4 i fr, let' ;ei.-°.--•'''----'-'41'i:', -'1' ... •
t, --4,, 4-4...-tir4 h.' 1;4"‘ -L.".. ' . -,X•• `r ,„, .N,,ttifir:Z-• t `vi, L.,-7,', .,.',....:4• .
17.. '4,''''.' ':. • gii*"4•$74.41%;-'''''''.1.. 44 4 i' ' trt1;,' rt -",, J .1...ci -*". ''s, tc,,I,
a e,
I$r w a ___
lit.
rw
Haney Tract-Permanent Photo Station 24
Looking Downstream South Mud4„. 441,dy Creek
; " oa t ti,1. ni x ,�{ � r a ,,
”244,. : --:, .t.::',',,,,,,..'...,-;,1 ';''-',-,,,-;-:. '''',.-.., -.--.:''' t...: .,....'-'1'' ,.-'-''''''' r-,--"zrnAt....A...! ... '-
,Ati4.,; unrA,Nvt---- ;"*.,,,,-.4„, - --.,,,,,-.\-:,5':5: -,.:.-7-'t-,1--.: -';oert,-; ,
aid r
.: ., ..„.,..
_..,,.4.40.0„....,x.,. ..,, , ..wk.,,,.,„:,...,...t..,, ,,.,.,,, Niltd",trt''''74.41.
"'^�4$41._
a. a"t`� i
T(K' Tx i a.3.
��a. r'pyU 1 ie 1 aztl. .•.
k s
q
ilit
� .fir; .o-., �� �. '... �S` _." '.
:, 04 24 2020
Haney Tract-Permanent Photo Station 25
Looking Downstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

....m,.,..,A. jig:; .n447".6.'".':.744.:::,'.1,, ',.i iii,W.;;;,-# '';':-
Op-
r I ..: ems ' ks ` ,a aF
(.4 .:T;- ,•,-,-zsi,..-4,,,,,,P4; :',.. ,71ii,s
... -,:„.._ . .. -,--,,,?:.±.1 ,,,t;„.„ .,..,.i„_.v...c..n.i.„.,.,„,,,,„......4L„_.
1. '.-,_ ,,,,-,--- --.-. .-. 4.--
„4-4
-. ..: ,-_-,..--.:- _ . -..:t.
- r'*',a '+€f�( `3""
t.,
..f
,),_.-_,;,„-.;1.
4
"� ' ;��t -- a f t € ?1,� �' 4.4 S t;b
— ---. _-..-
- ,-__--- -.-,:itif.,.-,-,:_ ._:-.:;--, -.-_-. 4..„_-...,-..v4.0_. -.. _ :_..--__ ___.:,:_,„. .,...,..7.,„..,.:;,..„,__.7,. :_...4._
_ _ __
,.
_ ,.
..
.._.,
_.__
,___ . ...
.,...._r
'.\ .
. 04'24 � 2�
Haney to South
Tract—Permanent Photo Station 26
Looking Upstream Tributary Muddy Creek
, v-,-,!,...,:i.47-,.. ,A,
.:
_ �.
¢ r
i
_ �"
F "1r
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 27
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

z
'4 F S ,r s• sue, ._. gyp_ ,k #R, z C, .
c7..—.:.:,---_:_._:'.A".7-4'4:-"1'_''447:7`.,,-'':.:,14--t 3_-,a,ti-.•(.t 41,-,r'-.i,,7,--'.,,:''.'.C.,)';'J-‹.''-'.-
7 Sxa ' ems' ;
a f"
{".- is - ,, ""
a7` �- ,,- '.*
- F..t
p� s..
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 27
Looking Downstream South Muddy Creek
[ 4 4� f rt i
�� y' a
C � � � 'if',
rtr
.s.a Y t ,.ir'�- A s4
.4.!._.,,, L-1-.;7,.,2,4 , -
ite
ill
t �';- -p o� 4 -Iti ak�4 `" 'F 3TT
'�ir-
- - mac, �
ALL,: -.�, r`. � S: iv'a'r.- 'J v�'
- --7* may^
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 28
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

....,..-.L.,-.:,,,-flt.';;L.:;?1,,;-.44*.;17M;',1:!:t5.Altht3i5,6i1:41.,,,,f.."Ar=-..'4,1%-.."--'sFkIk•Pf..7i..r.„l.'.-.•":''.:Ll';''='.,,i-':.:•f-:'•.,;'-''...•-,.'-1'"'.';7.1:.,"',1.....,''....i:.•.--..3'.'i
� i 1Y. �17Y' H � �' F f t,r ffc i�
3j
i i tea 9",a 44 x F4 w,,,... '' '.'4':
Sq � -: E -jt x '% . € `per
q g.
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo
Looking Downstream South Muddy
Station Creek28
g • t
^ t s a
�A ,t� ? e _�` `" . ' 1"r7 oF7 7,-T ,---- / ''_ (t >t,
rPaC -
x
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 28
Looking Upstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

_-,,; 4-i, x ,.. ...L., ,,,,,,,,:•,,,, ,_ ,., , -t. ,i , .,_..,.
,.._ 4_,_, ,.,..,._ ,.. , ,,.,..,, ,„,,. , ,„ _,....„,?_,,,,o,„:„..4,4,,„.. , „,,,,,ovc, ,...„,:,,,
r_-
_4.-;.-, _.,„.„„_,,,,,.,.- _
1:*: , . 4 , ..,,,...„ p .., ,1„ .. _ ,,,,,.,,,,. ,,.._.. ,7,....,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,,.....,.:,_,_._,
,.t.„, , ,,,,,,,,„r„.„„ ,,,: „„,., .4_,,,,..„,,,r, .,,,„.,_....,„,s.,,........... ,,, 41..,-
-1442s
�� �+ - + t : l,.<
~S ZIA
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 29
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
-i e 1.1 if OA',,,,,, `,At'-'ti.4-7.-,; ,..et, ,..,,--,-•vits-vtk .,. , , . .
141
p:F 's�� wt:. a t r '. -n6 § M r ;
3 Ey �y��a'. ;+fix _ .."'`^`�" ': •dF�,y6a 6n�, iu �` i}r I/
p r
C " - . .5 ( - f ,o (�. fit} g r
i j tl p u. ,`h 'GIP'
S ! QLa gee
., I� # +9 —saw ,.„';`; f a! ` '{ `� ''rx : t ,A �e yt-
i.
4;ov i,. , s5 r 3 ',�a FAR o r. ,t i` 41 t -
Are
` t 7 sft",
M '$. ,: a hg ;, *'a rd:g ' ° qa 8
y m f r +
past ��I 'E 17. ) 4. "'t'� ' _ i
T
A Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 30
Looking Downstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

I 1 % A i, 3. r
s ti : � .... . ,,e n,,.,.s ,I E - ,'- --ten, ._f 5 '�` a'zFT- r - 43' J ,. > i4ay a1a, ,. v„. t74M, -%
r. `- '. tom" '` 1
/ ;\• r .t ^\ - �( ♦, g. as ♦kF
'° r. . { RAJ -`,i ^; , +` �_ r i .
Haney Tract—Permanent Photo Station 31
Looking Upstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Repo
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020rt

Problem Area Photos
i 11'if(.7: 44.:,,i.4,‘ Sii .', '4 4.,•-•4,`,4r,)? .,'''i'jr•--.' :4‘.',' ': '''-r•''-'''':'_';'-f:''jf'll•-:4 -,;* :;,r{-- '41'1,*'P-•'
\ 7
.,:, : ,.: ,,,,,:„..„ , ,,,., _,,,, , ,, . '1.q 'A l' ‘,‘'iNi:...,",v1 l'''''''' .,,,;,.7-';'' '''''i"...-------7.7ir I
eit
4
,.... . ., .,, ,L. , ,, ,1 , ,o-ivif 41,,,,,A.,,,.,,„.. ....,,I..„-_,..,-,..„4„....
s .•fie ,�1 sy.�: 1�-,:it,
"F s „Ty_ Ny.''‘.).
� �4 '' !_ tee•er.• y'' °„ N"'
e;ATi,:1--.
� •
r � �,-. ^{ �`r �1. -:701
Failed Structure—Iva Branch STA 303+67 (looking upstream)
V f ;'Mt v .7 4 7 t¢ sk'`' b � 4 T P `., 4
" i� r ivy.IM7tkik,751):6W-i -, L i.,'''' -':4,,:;`'t, '';"Y -h- f•.•. �' o. r Y
T. �v ;- s ky . �F " . �,
r ' Y. � x2 �'x� i irz 'W, r ii Fs �i t r
moo, ,� /
•
T, a 7C= !?• I_rs r rot
7' 'nr i 7''' � .yr K�
w„ `�, i�ti ' . j e —
b � �`Y'y V y..us , „ i ,,` " A � 1
,
1. .3 " - - r a "'
s may,r 'R
S any. '" 4
-. ]ter_.
Bank Scoaur RDB— South Muddy Creek 109+00 (looking downstream)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Vegetation
Survival
Vegetation Plot ID Threshold Tract Mean
Met?
93875-01-0001 Yes
93875-01-0002 Yes
93875-01-0003 Yes 100%
93875-01-0004 Yes
93875-01-0005 Yes
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Report Prepared By Owen Carson
Date Prepared 10/30/2020 12:12
database name Equinox_2020_A_MiddleSouthMuddy_MY5.mdb
Z:\ES\NRI&M\EEP Monitoring\Middle South
database location Muddy\MY5_2020\Data\Veg
computer name FIELD-PC
file size 60858368
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Description of database file,the report worksheets,and a
Metadata summary of project(s)and project data.
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre,for each
Proj,planted year. This excludes live stakes.
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre,for each
year. This includes live stakes,all planted stems,and all
Proj,total stems natural/volunteer stems.
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data(live
Plots stems,dead stems, missing,etc.).
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
Damage occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp for each plot;dead and missing stems are excluded.
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species
(planted and natural volunteers combined)for each plot;dead
ALL Stems by Plot and spp and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code 93875
project Name Middle South Muddy Creek
Description
River Basin Catawba
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width(ft)
area(sq m)
Required Plots(calculated)
Sampled Plots 5
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts (Stems by Plot)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project
Current Plot Data (MY5 2020) Annual Means
Species 93875-01-0001 93875-01-0002 93875-01-0003 93875-01-0004 93875-01-0005 MY5(2020) MY4(2019) MY3(2018) MY2(2017) MY1 (2016) MVO(2016)
Scientific Name Common Name Type PnoL'.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T PnoL5.5.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T PnoL5.5.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T PnoL5.5.P-all T PnoL'.P-all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 2
Acer rubrum var.rubrun red maple Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 5
Carpinuscaroliniana American hornbeam Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 2 2 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Juniperusvirginiana eastern redcedar Tree 2
Platanusoccidentalis American sycamore Tree 4 4 4 7 7 14 1 1 7 6 6 45 2 2 17 20 20 87 20 20 40 20 20 47 20 20 39 20 20 20 20 20 20
Rhus aromatica fragrant sumac Shrub 11
Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub 11
Rhus glabra smooth sumac shrub 4 10 14 16 12
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 7 7 7
Stem count 9 9 9 15 15 24 8 8 14 11 11 54 13 13 38 56 56 139 56 56 95 57 57 97 58 58 89 60 60 71 60 60 60
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
Species count 4 4 4 5 5 6 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 8 8 10 8 8 11 7 7 9 7 7 8 7 7 8 7 7 7
Stems per ACRE 364.2 364.2 364.2 607 607 971.2 323.7 323.7 566.6 445.2 445.2 2185 526.1 526.1 1538 453.2 453.2 1125 453.2 453.2 768.9 461.3 461.3 785.1 469.4 469.4 720.3 485.6 485.6 574.7 485.6 485.6 485.6
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

. ...
4 • .
,. .
- 4 .
. _,.. -. ..,1-• I•4 '.-k j.
, •••;•'. .1 nr"‘. -:. , ... ., . '. ' p. A r'.z.,,'.. •' '\A, I ' • ' ".
.t 4 .-... .,:;•:>14:„ •. ,...f.4 ' . , :''' • 4''•: r.w 1 i• . 'r'•-•
-•••;14', --,s",'• ,./ "0 J. i -
' •. -' •••' ' :. ,:•;:•, , •,. ,,:••i•-•, ••••••4 ••• A J•• • • '"--%:_,
g•-• . ... 425.1 " t•)4'''.' ' 'iT ' i :, ,, 'ri d ;' '' • - ' ' .... '
,,•*•.,1 .41.:e.,' .., ,,-0;,:,,,;;,. ,'• '.,q . :.:',3 'pe.!4,-.-4' ,. ild' r•,,,i•.i;',Lr ',',-:--',-... -.04... . .4......'...,1
414.
:6;4?...:.fa, ' .', :--IL,';:.4.',%.,'i,,itY, i,?..4'0.''.it It d• i!,
'.• , f -v., •; l•- ..., '.pg.:it 44,'4,mt,.4.;t,.... ....',,14-$, tl.:.,:L.,I.R.,.•.,,r.., ,,, ,.er,„,.,.;. _j...,,,,ik
:, ...
14•7•.:* '7,7 e, ,..,,,,,,4...,. .r,-fel..,44t.,,%,,..5.'`. ,'-' ,,,'_•,..V.1r, .:,•,:,pi'• -, .rgt....1.',-.-, --,‘:.- .
..k or..- • •' ...4- 1•,..:4,.. .4 ,,,'"1• .A.,,,y,,L. 1.1Ni tY,. cs-t. 4 d.., :'
PA',:":'. • '-"t N,L'; ''''1* ,1' 0•-•i: 'C fj-d,.•4 4. '
'" •-d '4.4 r ,'4.' 'e••-•',,,, ,r,,41',1:•••',' ;d''''''- -,- • ;.•,''''''tz\- .-4 ,• '
kr. .,
— _ . . . , fee• . i,.,--. . ? .4t. .:- .j:-..;, -,A .....:,.A'. ,,
,., ,: --" . ,,r . e ; ei .•;': •. ';'10,:v•-•.,. f4.fo,i,.;•t .:4 '-r;,:, i,::
We, ,.. - e -,' ' • , ."...':',-,_..,..'ir ;„ • :' •-•'`. ,& 1 -40 'y'•# ' ••-(1' 'e.:''(1- -.
,,, ,, . :ei.,., — P.: ..:.•,;.,. .., ..-.1-;:,!!•-.1. •.t. e,d -...i-.
'•,:i;;,fef.. ;...r:-..,,. '.... -re', i-:,. , . ,•\;.- ' • 2 ;,:iii",..›„,,..."••- fk- it_,„,,Y•I'4: 4' .k'•,,,,,'
1 .47 - ..„--4,,,-;::.,..,:! ,r,!!!"- . .' • .;---:‘ , . ,::'- i;, ;', -.,,,tsi-9 ,,I..,2m. , •. •:.
Middle South Muddy- Vegetation Monitoring Plot I
'.1....7410.0b,..",...7 •i . 1 .
WI.
Ilf his
.
„,,-.- • ...k:. -..... ,--" :r_'r: ,.„,F..--, _.5.4 ,..,..-,
.../ _ ' '.- 1 .. ',_ -%,,_,-,:,;-r-'•.t.,1-1-14',,,,,--:4,- ,., ;-- , ----
I: i'k.,,,A•. ' ,:',..1.:A .dt.'., -4-Sati.'.....,V-."'tiii fr L'.•,„,-$".. .-...".,:` : :" •!, r kY„...
• . d.,•, d, .., .,,..-,•:PA,fif- .4..i.rfv• i•• ,,.4t,. ..r..,, • rs''......^ .•
, ,.• ,- •4.,. .S. , • • , .. '.---:::.:..... ,.,.y....-,,...":-.. ' • .'w--..4,--T-' a'. - ,,t-• -
....-....... *-41142.---., .. o,t; •,...• "••• —PAILyr.._•.: .„..z.4,4,--_- .,.„. :,...:-•_ ,.., .. ,-. •
;. ,"--:-•'- t•-,. '-',':' ,. -.4••. '...44•1p -'-'40:,'. ..,,i•f•-..1 '.,• :_ • .; : ---.:.4 4416M
.4_, 7.. f:4v,i, • j -, ... '•-. c'-vm'f- ` - '1
r ,...:•t... '
;L-_s•4,,, -+*0 •L0-1 .- i 1 ..,.,i:.
_r . e''' .--l'A.-ct.-•.$0-• •
L .,,„;dpkij, f,,,,,j,. --i','7,7 ..'.44, 1,,,''',. ''," .1• • ' '1 1 :5:,.., Y : '''
-ci.- -.1-.•-A4,-- ' , i , -4---- -1,•AP': :,:-. [, ,,..-'‘ .1.!•AV.4-71:',, -F.• ''
• .1,,,,...• ...-,... . , —, :-.4.44,t.v:r or,',),4t. as._. , ,: 1,- -ik. _ • -..
.,• -:•-,-•• -Fs., • •• g1/4z-viiry, •(.,-.,,it -„ ••-.•.•,r ..•.„,,..=0,:s..1 -,-• " •,
'''--r 4' •-. 14A-
--t--...- ...--' --- '11.,,t,-er —.iv.' . ,',-.....•.: ''4,-,pyi"..ri i;et
,..4.3).i.ZA..A6. ; . ' -':-,. ' ei:-• '‘''.--.i.;-e.'- .;rr.i'i rir -, • . - . —
- 'N . -Age:c.V4. ' , •" -P..--- • trio.-.L•. tk.1' ' —,1',.., / .i.c ' f - ,
.9 i.k: •• , ' .• Al _akw',, ,. ,
, . ' 1,4,17,,,•-• •1.fplfr.tr-J)P r ]LI UZ-U
. • -_,,,41 -i-i ' ' . 1.-'
. -4",i--•
Middle South Muddy-Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

•',,, '..- • . 11%. -li, fir i':.Prf-alrLi If'
lb,
•
-- ' 4_ ;s,y; rokip ' ' ' •r A
4 - y
•-4.0•• -- ' .,At-.--, .. ...•.:-, ,,,,, .4-, .4,44m, ....7-,,,,„...0
___...
,,..._ :,,,,,.,.„, ,...,., ...... ....„„. .T.„.,„. .... .,.. : ... ',1-7-t_•,e-s,i•''',
t�:•_�"•- s.- sue... _rr,0.:..�'. ... '
.i r r .,
„P. - - ..•_ '.. - - r y. • . :_ per .
• 1 .e' ' ' 1 .: a;'0' '' fix,.j 1 t "
- L., • ik , • . , , -,....0 ,,,„, . , . .„, .., . , _. ,1".•;,, •
„... .1 h •-i' h4h..N L,,i4, ,,,, .J..ar qrrszi —' ,r -', IV". ''',‘L, '' .,,P''' --A 4,
',-- • .--",----/r....,avir ,ipp,..);,.. 4•PI r,0• . J,e,7*,L,' ; • 1,, .,_... ,, , . ,
xl
Middle South Muddy- Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
-,4*Te-• t --$.; •i•
t P.-
41,i
Middle South Muddy-Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

�Y � f�
,rtt: :.
•
•
tit. F, `^.-- .ram ��- . x - .V �r'.:.�:::�•.
•
Styr • :t '• R ::. r,Y' ' • =,-� c.Li
r.
z4- y.� �.T ..,�i.� ': ~. Av � i� _ -( l $'
�" . . :;r. anti�+ n?'' rar;4.p.f:A' } ti' ti ' .y ' ]
•
•.,.._..:-,.,_.:,...„....-„,....., :ii:.1,14.... • ',-•?:S=.1;.-' rk-f..lt•P:,P;i••••:1.)•'.'.. '' '--.'-'.1:',.''.%
_ ray •_ '?. •
•l. d
i� r, 4 • • ••: ••< "
f ','•
• s
`� 1 f ob' ,r 1 020
.
Middle South Muddy- Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Muddy-South Muddy Creek/Lower South Muddy Creek(1,088 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curse I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach Data Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle LL UL Eq. Mu Mean Med Max SD N Mil Mean Med Max SD N Mn Mean Max Nhn Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfi ll Width(ft) - 30.7 19.4 36.6 30.8 30.7 31.1 31.0 31.6 0.5 3
Floodprone Width(ft) 30.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3
BankfullM can Depth(ft) - 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.1 0.3 3
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.9 0.4 3
Bankfi ll Cross Sectional Area(ft) 51.7 30.2 36.6 52.2 50.5 58.1 59.0 64.9 7.2 3
Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 14.9 18.1 14.8 16.8 15.9 19.8 2.6 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 2.8 2.1 2.1 2.7 2.8 3.3 0.6 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3
d50(mm) 29.0
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 17.7 64.0 54.4 109.6 85.4 229.5 68.9 5
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.77 3.60 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.001 5
Pool Length(ft) 12.0 36.0 34.8 50.8 51.3 66.3 12.4 5
Pool Max Depth(ft) 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.2 4.6 4.5 6.0 0.9 6
Pool Spacing(ft) 97.5 193.0 154.5 220.7 112.6 196.3 187.9 323.2 89.4 5
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 100.0 63.72 86.44 92.6 103 20.34 3
Radius of Curvature(ft) 32.0 514.0 - - - 61.0 - 102.1 114.7 120.1 121.8 10.9 3
Rc:Bankfi ll Width(ft) 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 0.4 3
Meander Wavelength(ft) 300.0 466.5 495.0 497.3 521.1 27.4 3
Meander Width Ratio 4.3 3.2 2.0 2.8 3.0 3.3 0.7 3
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% - - 55%!l l%/26%/8%/0%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% - 1%/8%/72%/17%/1%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/die/dee(mm) - 7.2/20/29/42/69/120/-/-
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)lb/Be - 0.857 - -
M ax Part Size(mm)M obiliz ed at Bankfull - 760 - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m5 - - -
Addi ti onal Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(mi5) - 3.33 4.7
Impervious Cover Estimate(%) - - -
Rosgen Classification - C4 C4 C4
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 3.9 -
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - - 143.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - 550 1,136
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - 600 1,161 1,163
Sinuosity - 1.10 1.03 1.03
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.003 0.003
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.003 0.002
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - -
Proportion Over Wide(%) - -
Entrenchment Class(ER Range) - -
Incision Class(BHR Range) - -
BEHI - -
Channel Stability or Habitat M etric - -
Biological or Other - -
-Infonnation unavailable.
Non-Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 10 Cont'd.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Muddy-Middle Sprouse Branch(177 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-listing Condition I Reference Reach Data I Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riff!e LL UL Eq. NBn Mean Med Max SD N NBn Mean Med Max SD N MB Mean Max ND Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 4.8
FloodproneWidth(ft)
BankfullMeanDepth(ft) - 0.5
BankfullMaxDepth(ft)
BankfullCrossSectionalArea(ftC) 0.5
Width/DepthRatioEntrenchment Ratio
BankHeightRatio
d50(mm) - 45.0 - - - -
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 20.0 40.0 15.2 20.0 16.1 28.8 7.6 3
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 1.500 4.300 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.010 0.002 3
Pool Length(ft) 6.0 42.0 3.7 9.2 8.2 16.5 5.3 4
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 2.3 2.3 0.8 1.6 2.0 1.8 2.7 0.5 4
Pool Spacing(ft) 51.0 113.0 15.9 22.7 43.0 49.1 44.4 60.1 9.5 3
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 43.0 7.1 7.9 7.8 8.9 0.9 3
Radius of Curvature(ft) 44.0 103.0 - - - - - 8.2 15.0 14.0 23.8 6.9 4
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft) 1.7 3.1 2.9 5.0 1.4 4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 100.0 20.4 26.3 27.1 30.7 4.5 4
Meander Width Ratio 1.8 2.3 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.9 0.2 3
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% - - 39%/0%/24%/8%/29%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be°/ - 1%/10%/48%/41%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/di°/dr(mm) - 5.2/22/45/75/130/190/-/-
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)lb/ft- - 1.947 - -
M axPart Size(mm)M obilized at Bankfull - 91 - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m- - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(mf) - 2.77 0.03
Impervious Cover Estimate(%) - - -
Rosgen Classification - B4 B5 B5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 6.1 -
BankfullDischarge(cfs) - - 210.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - 380 187
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - 400 177 177
Sinuosity - 1.1 1.06 1.01
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.031 0.029
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.031 0.029
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - -
Proportion Over Wide(%) - -
Entrenchment Class(ER Range) - -
Incision Class(BHR Range) - -
BEHI - -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric - -
Biological or Other - -
-Information unavailable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 10 Cont'd.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Muddy-Lower Sprouse Branch(434 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-listing Condition I Reference Reach Data I Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riff!e LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N MMB Mean Max MMB Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 5.3 - 23.4 - - 24.7 - - - 5.2 - 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.4 0.2 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 43.0 - - 52.0 - - - 15.0 - 14.0 19.0 19.0 24.0 3.5 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - 0.5 - 1.3 - - 1.5 - - - 0.4 - 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft) 1.8 - - 2.2 - - - 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ftr) 2.2 33.4 - - 34.6 - - - 1.9 - 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 0.0
Width/Depth Ratio 15.8 - - 18.4 - - - 14.3 - 15.1 15.9 15.9 16.7 1.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.8 - - 2.2 - - - 2.9 - 2.6 3.6 3.6 4.5 1.3 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.4 - - 1.6 - - - 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2
d50(mm) - 45.0 - - - -
Profile
Rifrle Length(ft) 20.0 40.0 6.0 16.2 14.2 32.2 9.3 9
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 1.5 4.3 0.003 0.011 0.011 0.025 0.007 9
Pool Length(ft) 6.0 42.0 3.4 8.7 9.0 12.1 3.1 11
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 2.3 2.3 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.8 2.3 0.3 11
Pool Spacing(ft) 51.0 113.0 18.1 25.8 19.0 32.9 32.2 55.1 10.5 10
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 43.0 10.1 10.4 10.4 10.6 0.3 3
Radius of Curvature(ft) 44.0 103.0 - - - - - 8.8 10.6 10.6 12.5 1.9 4
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft) 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.4 0.4 4
M eander Wavelength(ft) 100.0 33.2 38.1 38.5 42.9 3.5 5
Meander Width Ratio 1.8 3.1 - 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% - - 41%/6%/27%/9%/17%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be°/ - 1%/10%/48%/41%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/di°/dr(mm) - 5.2/22/45/75/130/190/-/-
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)lb/ft- - 1.947 - -
M axPart Size(mm)M obilized at Bankfull - 91 - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m- - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(mf) - 2.77 0.04
Impervious Cover Estimate(%) - - -
Rosgen Classification - B4 B5 B5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 6.1 -
BankfullDischarge(cfs) - - 210.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - 380.0 422
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - 400.0 453 453
Sinuosity - 1.1 1.07 1.07
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.014 0.017
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.014 0.017
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - -
Proportion Over Wide(%) - -
Entrenchment Class(ER Range) - -
Incision Class(BHR Range) - -
BEHI - -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric - -
Biological or Other - -
-Information unavailable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 10 Cont'd.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Muddy-Upper Iva Branch(326 fret)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach Data I Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle LL UL Eq. Nhn Mean Med Max SD N Nfln Mean Med Max SD N Nhn Mean Max NE Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 4.8 - - - - - - - 23.4 - - 24.7 - - - 4.8 - 4.6 4.9 4.9 5.3 0.5 2
Floodprone Width(ft) - - - - - - 43.0 - - 52 - - - 15.0 - 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2
BankfullM can Depth(ft) - 0.5 1.3 1.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 2
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) - - - - - - 1.8 - - 2.2 - - - 0.5 - 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(fte) 1.8 - - - - - - 33.4 - - 34.6 - - - 1.6 - 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 0.1 2
Width/Depth Ratio - - - - - - 15.8 - - 18.4 - - - 14.1 - 11.0 12.2 12.2 13.3 1.6 2
Entrenchment Ratio - - - - - - 1.8 - - 2.2 - - - 3.2 - 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 0.1 2
Bank Height Ratio - - - - - - 1.4 - - 1.6 - - - 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2
d50(mm)
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) - - - - - - 20.0 - - 40.0 - - - - - 26.7 48.8 40.1 90.6 24.6 5
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) - - - - - - 1.50 - - 4.30 - - - - - 0.001 0.004 0.002 0.009 0.003 5
Pool Length(ft) - - - - - - 6.0 - - 42.0 - - - - - 2.1 2.8 2.7 3.4 0.6 4
Pool Max Depth(ft) - - - - - - 2.3 - - 2.3 - - - 0.8 - 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.3 4
Pool Spacing(ft) - - - - - - 51.0 - - 113.0 - - 15.9 - 22.7 47.1 55.5 59.0 60.4 7.3 3
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 43.0 11.9 14.8 14.8 17.6 4.0 2
Radius of Curvature(ft) - - - - - - 44.0 - - 103.0 - - - - - 7.6 9.4 8.4 13.2 2.6 4
Rc:Bankfill Width(ft) 1.5 1.9 1.7 2.7 0.5 4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 100.0 43.2 48.1 47.7 53.8 5.0 4
Meander Width Ratio
1115
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
ffi%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% - - 80%/0%/4%/2%/14%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% - 1%!10%/48%/41%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/die/deP(mm) - 5.2/22/45/75/130/190/-/-
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ftZ - 1.947 - -
M ax Part Size(mm)M obilized at Bankfull - 91 - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m2 - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(mie) - 2.77 0.03
Impervious Cover Estimate(%) - - -
Rosgen Classification - B4 B5 B5
-
Bankfu
ankfulll ischar (fps) - - 1.1
0.
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) - - 210.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - 380 424
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - 400 326 326
Sinuosity - 1.10 1.09 1.10
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.058 0.056
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.058 0.056
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - -
Proportion Over Wide(%) - -
Entrenchment Class(ER Range) - -
Incision Class(BHR Range) -
-
BEHI - -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric - -
Biological or Other L - -
-Information wavailable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 10 Cont'd.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Muddy-Lower Iva Branch(136 feet)
Parameter I Regional Curve I Pre-Existing Condition I Reference Reach Data I Design I As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle LL UL Eq. 'Mu Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Mu Mean Max Mu Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width(ft) - 5.6 - - - - - - - 23.4 -
FloodproneWidth(ft) 43.0 52 15.0
BankfullM can Depth(ft) - 0.5 1.3 1.5 0.4
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 1.8 2.2 0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Arm(ft') 2.4 33.4 34.6 2.1
Width/Depth RatioEntrenchment Ratio 1.8 2.2 2.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.4 1.6 1.0
d50(mm)
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) - - - - - - 20.0 - - 40.0 - - - - - 9.4 11.8 11.8 14.3 3.5 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) - - - - - - 1.50 - - 4.30 - - - - - 0.010 0.021 0.021 0.033 0.016 2
Pool Length(ft) - - - - - - 6.0 - - 42.0 - - - - - 5.8 9.4 9.4 12.9 3.3 4
Pool Max Depth(ft) - - - - - - 2.3 - - 2.3 - - - 0.9 - 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 4
Pool Spacing(ft) - - - - - - 51.0 - - 113.0 - - 19.3 - 27.5 20.8 25.9 20.8 36.1 8.9 3
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) - - - - - - - 43.0 - - - - 8.9 9.6 9.6 10.3 1.0 2
Radius of Curvature(ft) - - - - - - 44.0 - - 103.0 - - 12.2 12.5 12.5 12.8 0.4 2
Rc:Bankull Width(ft) 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.1 2
Meander Wavelength(ft) - - - - - - - 100.0 - - - - 23.0 27.4 25.5 33.6 5.6 3
Meander Width Ratio
Illb
Substrate,Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% - - 24%/17%/38%/20%/0%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% - 1%!10%/48%/41%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/die/deP(mm) - 5.2/22/45/75/130/190/-/-
Reach Shear Stress(Competency)Ib/ftZ - 1.947 - -
M ax Part Size(mm)M obilized at Bankfull - 91 - -
Stream Power(Transport Capacity)W/m2 - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area(mie) - 2.77 0.046
Impervious Cover Estimate(%) - - -
Rosgen Classification - B4 B5 B5
Bankfull Velocity(fps) - - 6.1 -
BankfullDischarge(cfs) - - 210.0 -
Valley Length(ft) - 380.0 151
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) - 400.0 156 156
Sinuosity - 1.10 1.02 1.03
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.026 0.032
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) - - 0.026 0.035
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres) - -
Proportion Over Wide(%) - -
Entrenchment Class(ER Range) - -
Incision Class(BHR Range) -
-
BEHI - -
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric - -
Biological or Other L - -
-Information rnavailable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

I Table lla. Baseline Morphology& Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Cross-Section 1 (Riffle) Cross-Section 2(Riffle) Cross-Section 3(Pool) Cross-Section 4(Riffle) Cross-Section 5(Riffle)
Lower Sprouse Branch Lower Sprouse Branch Lower Sprouse Branch South Muddy Creek South Muddy Creek
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used 1,278.1 1,278.1 1,278.1 1,278.2 1,278.1 1,278.2 1,275.8 1,275.8 1,275.8 1,276.0 1,275.9 1,275.8 1,273.7 1,273.7 1,273.7 1,273.8 1,273.7 1,273.8 1,269.4 1,269.4 1,269.4 1,269.5 1,269.4 1,269.5 1,267.9 1,267.9 1,267.9 1,268.1 1,268.0 1,268.1
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used - - - 1,278.1 1,278.4 1,278.3 - - - 1,275.9 1,276.0 1,276.1 - - - 1,273.7 1,273.6 1,273.4 - - - 1,269.4 1,269.5 1,269.4 - - - 1,268.4 1,268.6 1,268.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.4 6.1 6.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.1 5.3 5.4 6.3 6.0 4.4 6.1 6.8 6.8 8.0 7.2 8.3 31.6 32.6 31.8 30.2 29.0 28.0 30.7 30.6 31.8 29.6 29.0 28.4
Floodprone Width(ft) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 101.0 101.0 101.0 101.0 101.0 101.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.6 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 5.9 6.3 6.3 5.9 5.9 5.9 50.5 54.1 52.8 50.5 50.5 50.5 59.0 57.9 61.3 59.0 59.0 59.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.7 25.4 25.8 17.4 17.0 16.7 15.1 21.5 23.7 23.3 21.2 11.4 6.3 7.5 7.3 10.9 8.7 11.9 19.8 19.7 19.1 18.0 16.7 15.5 15.9 16.2 16.4 14.9 14.3 13.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.5 4.3 4.3 3.7 3.9 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.0 4.5 3.8 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio* 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2
Low Top of Bank Height Depth(ft) - - - 0.4 0.9 0.8 - - - 0.6 0.6 1.1 - - - 1.2 1.5 1.2 - - - 2.7 2.2 2.7 - - - 3.6 3.5 3.8
d50(mm) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.0 27.0 27.0 44.0 36 N/A 18.0 15.0 16.0 2.4 18
Cross-Section 6(Pool) Cross-Section 7(Riffle) Cross-Section 8(Pool) Cross-Section 9(Riffle) Cross-Section 10(Riffle)
South Muddy Creek South Muddy Creek Upper Iva Branch Upper Iva Branch Upper Iva Branch
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used 1,268.0 1,268.0 1,268.0 1,268.1 1,268.2 1,268.2 1,267.3 1,267.3 1,267.3 1,267.5 1,267.6 1,267.6 1,286.1 1,286.1 1,286.1 1,286.2 1,286.1 1,286.2 1,285.3 1,285.3 1,285.3 1,285.2 1,285.3 1,285.2 1,277.1 1,277.1 1,277.1 1,277.2 1,277.1 1,277.1
Low Bank Height Elevation(datum)Used - - - 1,268.5 1,268.4 1,268.6 - - - 1,267.4 1,267.3 1,267.4 - - - 1,286.0 1,285.9 1,285.9 - - - 1,285.2 1,285.2 1,285.2 - - - 1,277.2 1,277.2 1,277.2
Bankfull Width(ft) 35.3 35.9 36.7 31.7 31.7 30.3 31.0 31.2 34.0 36.2 36.2 33.7 5.5 5.8 5.6 7.2 6.9 6.5 4.6 4.2 4.1 6.0 5.2 5.6 5.3 5.6 5.8 4.2 4.5 6.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 166.0 166.0 166.0 166.0 166.0 166.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 4.0 3.9 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.6 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.4 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 85.7 86.3 89.2 85.7 85.7 85.7 64.9 67.7 67.9 64.9 64.9 64.9 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.5 14.9 15.1 11.7 11.8 10.7 14.8 14.4 17.0 20.2 20.2 17.5 5.4 6.1 5.5 9.0 8.4 7.4 11.0 9.8 8.0 18.7 14.8 16.4 13.3 16.7 13.3 8.4 9.8 17.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 4.6 4.5 5.2 5.2 5.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.5 2.3 2.7 2.5 3.2 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.8 2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9
Low Top of Bank Height Depth(ft) - - - 4.7 3.9 4.0 - - - 3.2 3.2 3.2 - - - 1.3 1.3 1.3 - - - 0.7 0.6 0.6 - - - 0.8 0.6 0.6
d50(mm) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.91 1.3 18.0 6.2 22.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A-Item does not apply.
*Beginning in MY3(2018),the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDM S(9/2018)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table 11b. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site -South Muddy Creek(1,088 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width(ft) 30.7 31.1 31.0 31.6 0.5 3 30.6 31.5 31.2 32.6 1.0 3 31.8 32.5 31.8 34.0 1.3 3 29.6 29.9 29.9 30.2 0.3 3 29.0 31.4 29.0 36.2 4.1 3 28.0 30.0 28.4 33.7 3.2 3
Floodprone Width(ft) 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3 65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2 3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.1 0.3 3 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.2 0.3 3 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.0 0.2 3 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 0.2 3 1.7 1.9 1.8 2.0 0.2 3 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.1 0.1 3
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.9 0.4 3 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.0 0.2 3 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.1 0.3 3 2.8 3.2 3.3 3.4 0.3 3 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.5 0.4 3 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.4 0.3 3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 50.5 58.1 59.0 64.9 7.2 3 54.1 59.9 57.9 67.7 7.0 3 52.8 60.7 61.3 67.9 7.5 3 50.5 57.9 59.0 64.3 6.9 3 50.5 58.1 59.0 64.9 7.3 3 50.5 58.1 59.0 64.9 7.3 3
Width/Depth Ratio 14.8 16.8 15.9 19.8 2.6 3 14.4 16.7 16.2 19.7 2.7 3 16.4 17.5 17.0 19.1 1.4 3 13.9 15.6 14.9 18.0 2.2 3 14.3 17.1 16.7 20.2 3.0 3 13.6 15.5 15.5 17.5 1.9 3
Entrenchment Ratio 2.1 2.7 2.8 3.3 0.6 3 2.0 2.7 2.8 3.3 0.7 3 2.0 2.6 2.6 3.2 0.6 3 2.2 2.8 2.9 3.4 0.6 3 2.2 2.7 2.4 3.5 0.7 3 2.3 2.8 2.6 3.6 0.6 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.1 3 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 3 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 3
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 54.4 109.6 85.4 229.5 68.9 5 64.1 111.4 90.3 203.5 56.0 5 58.0 108.2 99.1 202.2 57.7 5 70.2 102.6 77.4 206.9 58.7 5 44.4 114.6 113.4 203.3 55.8 6 13.3 57.7 43.9 121.7 38.0 6
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.001 5 0.001 0.005 0.004 0.009 0.003 5 0.001 0.004 0.003 0.008 0.003 5 0.000 0.004 0.001 0.013 0.005 5 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.007 0.002 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6
Pool Length(ft) 34.8 50.8 51.3 66.3 12.4 5 17.8 56.4 48.5 96.8 30.1 5 23.4 56.0 56.9 95.7 26.5 5 26.0 55.6 54.3 91.7 24.8 5 21.8 42.6 37.4 67.6 17.1 5 14.3 55.3 46.8 103.3 31.7 9
Pool Max Depth(ft) 3.2 4.6 4.5 6.0 0.9 6 3.4 4.1 3.8 5.4 0.8 5 3.7 4.6 4.4 5.8 0.8 5 3.0 4.7 4.6 6.2 1.4 5 3.9 5.4 5.4 7.5 1.3 5 1.1 1.9 1.6 3.5 0.9 10
Pool Spacing(ft) 112.6 196.3 187.9 323.2 89.4 5 177.1 247.4 239.1 334.2 68.6 4 179.1 249.1 230.1 357.2 81.2 4 139.1 248.7 229.5 396.8 112.5 4 69.1 212.7 256.5 268.6 96.1 4 26.5 116.4 80.3 263.8 86.5 8
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 63.7 86.4 92.6 103.0 20.34 3
Radius of Curvature(ft) 102.1 114.7 120.1 121.8 10.94 3
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 3.28 3.7 3.86 3.92 0.35 3
Meander Wavelength(ft) 466.5 495.0 497.3 521.1 27.38 3
Meander Width Ratio 2.0 2.8 3.0 3.3 0.65 3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification C4 C4 C4 C4 C4 C4
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 1,163 1,158 1,174 1,151 1,141 1,141
Sinuosity(ft) 1.03 1.03 1.05 1.03 1.02 1.019
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.003 0.0033 0.0033 0.0027 0.0033 0.0035
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.002 0.0029 0.0037 0.0031 0.0034 0.0032
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 55% 11% 26% 8% 0% 56% 6% 28% 9% 0% 54% 10% 28% 8% 0% 53% 11% 29% 8% 0% 64% 6% 20% 10% 0°0 30% 4% 44% 21% 0%
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table llb Cont'd. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site -Middle S irons Branch(177 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 15.2 20.0 16.1 28.8 7.6 3 18.1 27.3 23.6 40.1 11.5 3 16.9 24.0 19.6 35.5 10.0 3 16.3 23.9 18.4 37.0 11.4 3 16.3 29.6 32.5 37.0 9.5 3 8.4 29.0 28.3 51.0 19.0 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.010 0.002 3 0.003 0.008 0.009 0.013 0.005 3 0.002 0.010 0.011 0.017 0.008 3 0.007 0.010 0.009 0.013 0.003 3 0.007 0.013 0.012 0.019 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4
Pool Length(ft) 3.7 9.2 8.2 16.5 5.3 4 6.5 9.4 9.9 11.5 2.2 4 5.7 8.1 7.4 11.9 2.7 4 6.0 8.5 8.2 11.7 2.4 4 8.44 11.04 10.99 13.72 2.22 4 4.1 9.2 7.6 20.3 5.2 8
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 1.6 2.0 1.8 2.7 0.5 4 1.1 1.8 1.8 2.4 0.6 4 1.3 1.8 1.7 2.4 0.5 4 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.8 0.2 4 1.22 1.55 1.57 1.80 0.22 4 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.5 0.3 8
PoolSpacing(ft) 43.0 49.1 44.4 60.1 9.5 3 52.3 58.9 52.6 71.7 11.1 3 42.4 49.3 47.2 58.3 8.2 3 42.2 48.9 47.8 56.5 7.2 3 42.23 48.86 47.81 56.53 7.21 3 8.4 24.8 18.5 56.7 18.8 8
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 7.1 7.9 7.8 8.9 0.9 3
Radius of Curvature(ft) 8.2 15.0 14.0 23.8 6.9 4
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 1.7 3.1 2.9 5.0 1.4 4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 20.4 26.3 27.1 30.7 4.5 4
Meander Width Ratio 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.9 0.2 3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 177 159 160 158 156 158
Sinuosity(ft) 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.02 1.01 1.01
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.029 0.028 0.029 0.030 0.02 0.02
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.029 0.025 0.026 0.023 0.021 0.024
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 39% 0% 24% 8% 29% 44% 0% 20% 7% 28% 46% 0% 21% 7% 27% 45% 0% 21% 5% 28% 49% 0% 18% 13% 21% 56% 0% 35% 6% 2%
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table llb Cont'd. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site -Lower Sprouse Branch(434 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.4 0.2 2 5.3 5.7 5.7 6.1 0.6 2 5.4 5.8 5.8 6.3 0.6 2 5.5 5.9 5.9 6.3 0.5 2 5.5 5.7 5.7 6.0 0.3 2 4.4 4.9 4.9 5.5 0.8 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 14.0 19.0 19.0 24.0 3.5 2 14.0 18.5 18.5 23.0 6.4 2 14.0 18.5 18.5 23.0 6.4 2 14.0 18.5 18.5 23.0 6.4 2 14.0 18.5 18.5 23.0 6.4 2 14.0 18.5 18.5 23.0 6.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 2
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.0 2 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 0.0 2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.1 2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.2 2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 0.0 2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 0.1 2 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 0.1 2
Width/Depth Ratio 15.1 15.9 15.9 16.7 1.1 2 21.5 23.4 23.4 25.4 2.8 2 23.7 24.8 24.8 25.8 1.5 2 17.4 20.3 20.3 23.3 4.1 2 17.0 19.1 19.1 21.2 3.0 2 11.4 14.0 14.0 16.7 3.7 2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.6 3.6 3.6 4.5 1.3 2 2.3 3.3 3.3 4.3 1.4 2 2.2 3.2 3.2 4.3 1.4 2 2.5 3.1 3.1 3.7 0.8 2 2.5 3.2 3.2 3.9 0.9 2 2.5 3.9 3.9 5.3 1.9 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.0 2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.3 2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.5 0.2 2
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 6.0 16.2 14.2 32.2 9.3 9 7.6 19.1 14.2 39.7 11.0 9 5.3 15.1 10.6 30.2 9.2 9 6.4 16.2 12.2 32.5 10.6 6 8.8 19.9 14.8 37.0 11.4 6 12.2 28.7 30.4 41.7 14.4 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.003 0.011 0.011 0.025 0.007 9 0.004 0.009 0.009 0.016 0.004 9 0.004 0.012 0.010 0.025 0.007 9 0.007 0.014 0.011 0.030 0.008 6 0.005 0.010 0.010 0.017 0.005 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4
PoolLength(ft) 3.4 8.7 9.0 12.1 3.1 11 5.2 10.4 10.4 15.7 3.6 11 3.8 9.3 9.1 15.5 4.2 11 5.4 9.4 9.1 17.8 3.6 11 3.1 12.1 10.7 35.9 7.3 11 3.3 12.2 6.3 36.7 9.9 14
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 1.3 1.8 1.8 2.3 0.3 11 1.0 1.8 1.9 2.3 0.4 11 1.4 1.7 1.7 2.1 0.3 11 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 0.3 11 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 0.3 11 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.3 0.3 13
PoolSpacing(ft) 19.0 32.9 32.2 55.1 10.5 10 26.3 39.2 38.6 62.5 10.8 10 17.3 32.9 33.0 54.6 10.1 10 19.4 32.8 34.3 55.2 10.9 10 19.4 29.8 29.2 42.2 8.4 10 5.2 29.4 17.2 96.6 27.7 12
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 10.1 10.4 10.4 10.6 0.3 3
Radius of Curvature(ft) 8.8 10.6 10.6 12.5 1.9 4
Re:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.4 0.4 4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 33.2 38.1 38.5 42.9 3.5 5
Meander Width Ratio 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 453 465 463 466 469 469
Sinuosity(ft) 1.07 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.05 1.05
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.017 0.014 0.017 0.018 0.020 0.02
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.017 0.016 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.021
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 41% 6% 27% 9% 17% 41% 6% 27% 9% 16% 39% 6% 29% 10% 16% 28% 8% 29% 12% 22% 30% 13% 27% 13% 17% 31% 5% 46% 12% 7%
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table llb Cont'd. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site -Upper Iva Branch(326 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.6 4.9 4.9 5.3 0.5 2 4.2 4.9 4.9 5.6 1.0 2 4.1 4.9 4.9 5.8 1.2 2 4.2 5.1 5.1 6.0 1.2 2 3.7 5.2 5.2 6.7 2.2 2 5.6 5.8 5.8 6.1 0.3 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 2.1 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 2
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 2 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.1 2 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.1 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 0.1 2 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.0 2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.5 0.3 2 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 0.2 2 1.2 1.7 1.7 2.1 0.6 2 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 0.1 2
Width/Depth Ratio 11.0 12.2 12.2 13.3 1.6 2 9.8 13.2 13.2 16.7 4.9 2 8.0 10.6 10.6 13.3 3.7 2 8.4 13.6 13.6 18.7 7.3 2 11.2 16.4 16.4 21.5 7.3 2 16.4 17.2 17.2 17.9 1.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 0.1 2 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.3 0.2 2 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.5 0.4 2 2.3 3.2 3.2 4.0 1.2 2 2.1 3.4 3.4 4.6 1.8 2 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.8 0.2 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 2 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.1 2 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 2
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 26.7 48.8 40.1 90.6 24.6 5 21.8 46.1 37.7 88.5 25.5 5 23.6 46.3 35.6 87.7 25.1 5 26.6 46.6 32.3 83.9 24.6 5 13.0 30.5 27.2 49.3 15.2 5 31.4 50.2 43.4 86.4 22.4 5
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.001 0.004 0.002 0.009 0.003 5 0.005 0.007 0.007 0.011 0.002 5 0.006 0.008 0.007 0.011 0.002 5 0.011 0.022 0.023 0.033 0.010 5 0.007 0.015 0.014 0.024 0.006 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5
Pool Length(ft) 2.1 2.8 2.7 3.4 0.6 4 3.2 4.5 4.1 6.7 1.7 4 1.6 4.2 4.2 6.9 2.3 4 6.2 6.7 6.3 7.9 0.8 4 7.6 15.7 19.1 20.5 7.1 3 2.1 4.5 4.7 7.1 1.7 11
PoolMaxDepth(ft) 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.3 4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 4 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.0 0.3 4 0.4 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.4 3 0.2 0.9 0.3 3.7 1.5 5 - - - - - -
PoolSpacing(ft) 47.1 55.5 59.0 60.4 7.3 3 49.6 54.9 54.9 60.1 5.3 3 48.2 54.8 53.9 62.3 7.1 3 41.3 55.5 43.5 81.7 22.7 3 45.0 60.9 60.9 76.8 22.5 2 - - - - -Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 11.9 14.8 14.8 17.6 4.0 2
Radius of Curvature(ft) 7.6 9.4 8.4 13.2 2.6 4
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 1.5 1.9 1.7 2.7 0.5 4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 43.2 48.1 47.7 53.8 5.0 4
Meander Width Ratio 2.4 3.0 3.0 3.5 0.8 2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 326 330 328 332 325 325
Sinuosity(ft) 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.12 1.09 1.09
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.056 - - 0.0532 - 0.048
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.056 0.0598 0.0595 0.0670 0.047 0.036
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 80% 0% 4% 2% 14% 75% 0% 6% 4% 15% 75% 0% 5% 4% 15% 77% 0% 9% 3% 11% 66% 0% 20% 0% 14% 79% 0% 16% 1% 5%
-Information Unavailable *Calculations based upon dry channel indicators
N/A-Information does not apply. Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Table llb Cont'd. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site -Lower Iva Branch(136 feet)
Parameter Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY-3 MY-4 MY-5
Dimension&Substrate-Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Floodprone Width(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Entrenchment Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bank Height Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 9.4 11.8 11.8 14.3 3.5 2 10.4 16.5 16.5 22.7 8.7 2 11.6 17.2 17.2 22.8 7.9 2 6.7 12.7 12.7 18.7 8.5 2 6.7 27.3 19.2 64.1 25.2 2 9.4 17.6 16.5 27.9 8.3 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.010 0.021 0.021 0.033 0.016 2 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.026 0.015 2 0.009 0.015 0.015 0.020 0.007 2 0.009 0.022 0.022 0.035 0.019 2 0.005 0.016 0.011 0.035 0.013 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4
Pool Length(ft) 5.8 9.4 9.4 12.9 3.3 4 2.9 5.3 5.0 8.3 2.7 4 3.4 5.8 4.9 10.0 3.1 4 3.5 7.1 7.5 9.8 2.9 4 3.8 12.4 12.5 20.7 8.2 4 8.5 15.5 13.1 31.0 9.1 5
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 4 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.3 4 0.5 1.1 1.0 1.7 0.5 4 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.5 0.5 4 0.3 0.8 0.7 1.5 0.5 4 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.8 0.5 8
PoolSpacing(ft) 20.8 25.9 20.8 36.1 8.9 3 18.0 23.4 24.4 27.8 5.0 3 18.9 23.8 25.0 27.6 4.5 3 21.3 25.2 25.5 28.8 3.8 3 24.8 49.2 42.6 80.1 28.2 3 4.5 20.1 17.7 46.9 15.6 7
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft) 8.9 9.6 9.6 10.3 1.0 2
Radius of Curvature(ft) 12.2 12.5 12.5 12.8 0.4 2
Rc:Bankfull Width(ft/ft) 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.1 2
Meander Wavelength(ft) 23.0 27.4 25.5 33.6 5.6 3
Meander Width Ratio 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.9 0.2 2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5
Channel Thalweg Length(ft) 156 154 159 158 153 153
Sinuosity(ft) 1.03 1.03 1.07 1.06 1.03 1.03
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.032 - - 0.0503 0.03 0.03
Bankfull Slope(ft/ft) 0.035 0.026 0.033 0.034 0.042 0.043
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 24% 17% 38% 20% 0% 43% 17% 28% 14% 0% 45% 14% 30% 11% 0% 34% 13% 38% 16% 0% 56% 6% 33% 5% 0% 44% 0% 49% 7% 0%
-Information Unavailable
N/A-Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 1 Station: 203+60
Reach Name: Lower Sprouse Branch XS Type: Riffle
1280
w 1279s. f - I
1278
1277 ,
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 i1-45
Station(feet)
MVO MY1 N.Pi, MY3 MMY4 MY5 BKI-
CHANNEL.DIMENSIONS SUMMARY \IYl) MYl MY2 MY3 111'4 MYS 111'6 1117
Bankful Width(n) 5.4 6.1 6.3 5.0 5.5 5.5 - -
Floodprone Width(n) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 1.4.0 14.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 - -
fankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft') 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.8-
- -
Widthl7epth Ratio 16.7 25.4 25.8 17.4 17.0 16.7 - -
Entrenchment Ratio 2.6 2.3 2 2 2.8 2.5 2.5 - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 0.9 i.5 1.5 1.2 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(II) 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.9 0.8 - -
. -::1-•;,.:,7:-.:'::.,:'1';1:1.-:::-.' -:,..', .. ' ,,. .1. i:,,,,.4..7..?:f.1".!.
. ► Si,.F= - y,� •rj,..t..1
xi.
.6
, .
,._ . , .. .
, . # R.. � rryi••'. .gip �,�.
. •r b - " NOV-4
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 2 Station: 204+72
Reach Name: Lower Sprouse Branch XS Type: Riffle
1278
I1276
1275
6-06 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 6+25 0+36 0+35 11-411
Station(feet)
MY() MY1 \Pi, MY3 11Y3 MY? HKI-
r
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY \IY6 MY1 34rY2 MY3 MV4 MYS 111'6 1117
Bankful Width(ft) 5.1 5.3 5.4 4.0 6.0 4.4 - -
Floodprone Width(n) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.6 0"5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 - -
fankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft') 1.7 1"3 1.2 0.9 1.7 1.7-
- -
WidthDepth Ratio 15.1 21.5 23.7 183 21.2 11.4 - -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.5 4.3 4.3 5.8 3.9 53 - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.5 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 I 1.1 - -
- _ -Fa'.:..'r ,'.a.p.'a'+TM... s.,'-.-..,
. 'ti.4:': .-+"' -•-:'- :••• . , ; ' • . A::.',:,..,e...',-.--.-,.-,.Z., 1'._L.... ,e,
=.•
i- vi
•
Lefl Descending Bank r'I,i 11.•••..:',1sng Bank
-
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 3 Station: 205+79
Reach Name: Lower Sprouse Branch XS Type: Pool
1275
l
et 1274 f
frel
E 1273 •• x 1
1
`NN4 Fiji
1272
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 04-30 0-35 1-40
Station(fret)
MYO MY1 \1 2 MY3 11Y4 MY5 BKI-
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY \IY0 MYI MY2 MY3 M1Y4 MY5 31-Y6 \117
Bankful Width(ft) 6.1 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.2 8.3 - -
Floodprone Width(n) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.2 1.6 1.6 - -
fankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft) 5.9 6.3 6.3 5.3 5.9 5.9-
-
WidthDepth Ratio 6.3 7.5 7.3 10.1 8.7 11.9 - -
Entrenchment Ratio 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.5 3.8 - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(t) 1.5 - 1.6 1.8 1.2 1.5 1.2 -
J ..q ' `� y}r 3, y+ i 'r • -ram•s : .,. 'sx P'� •� 1 �4 .. •.s at•..•"• J:s
;tom, 4�.'. is t. ,t '�!° 's` x -.
�r; ' .x• •sue ✓ "� �. J'a. .-.. .
11' • jf
L
t .: e.
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 4 Station: 1(T2+79
Reach Name: South Muddy Creek XS Type: Riffle
'IL,
0+00 0+05 0+10 1:F+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90
Statism(feet)
WO -MYl MY2 MY3 Nrf 4 - MY5 BKF
C'ILANNFI.DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 \1Y6 \1V7
Bankful Width(ft) 31.6 32.6 -- 31.8 29.5 29.0 28.0 - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.3 2.6 _ 2.6 2.7 I 2.8 2.9 - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(h") 50.5 54.1 52.8 46.9 50.5 50.5 - -
Width-Depth Ratio 19.8 19.7 19.1 18-6 16.7 15.5 - -
Entrenchment Ratio 2.1 2.0 2-0 2.2 2.2 2.3 --
-
Bank Hcight Ratio 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft). 2.1 - 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.2 2.7 - •
'+ - . if
I., ,. > ;
;:;tri
•4'1=,: i
+i fir. r.yA Of ~�'�. -'., q.•f•': iv.�E '� :f•`:�
4ti N:`^�:' '.5�• '.'!y1'YS.t.. '--c.,_"��:. ..ri�•�.ti f: R'-•'•i`SAMk... ,� -�'.4r1 ..
14,
*mo,
:. .'T.•i�''T • .na..- `�.w tip` - /'
- � z-
•
.hsr
-7;1
Y:U�'f'2p - - 5
Left Descending f 3rink Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 5 Station: 107-+'45
Reach Name: South Muddy Creek XS Type: Riffle
1271
■
1270 -111, _ _ -__
--____l
w 1269 -
q
1268
V 1267 ‘... 111111111PPr/17
M 1266 •
1265 -- � - -
1264 • - - -
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 04-25 0+30 04-35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95
Station(feet)
MVO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 t MY5 BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 W11.7
Bankful Width(8) 30.7 30.6 -- 31.8 28.4 29.0 28.4 - -
floodprone Width(ft) 101.0 101.0 101.0 101.0 101.0 101.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)_ 2-8 2.8 3-0 3.1 3-4 3.1 - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft") 59.0 57-9 61.3 52-9 59-0 59-0 - -
WidthDepthRatio 15.9 1G-2 16.4 15-3 14-3 13-6 - -
-
Entrenchment Ratio 3-3 3.3 32 3.6 3.5 3-6 - -
Bank Hcight Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.6 3.5 3.8 - -
.. C:.• �;.
$.t-, :., . - --.: ''-,-, .4 0 tm,-*-1-
_ ! rC.�,, i. ,
. ' � = - -
v-
! ! ►,;u, ..r a. , -`-.s 311-'Z' NOV-4-20
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 6 Station: 108+57
Reach Name: South Muddy Creek XS Type: Pool
1270
1269
`" \
t 1268 - -
w
1267
o 1266 ��
m 1265 Niii.
- -
1264 -_`
-
1263
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 6+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 6+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95
Station(feet)
MYo -MY' MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 -- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MV4 MYS 3IY6 \IV7
Bankful Width(S) 35.3 35.9 -- 36.7 31.4 31.7 30.3 - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 166.0 166.0 166.0 166.0 166.0 166.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.8 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 4.0 3.9 3"9 4.2 3.7 3.6 - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(h") 85.7 86.3 89.2 84.0 85.7 85.7 - -
-
WidthDepthRatio 14.5 14.9 15.1 11.7 11.8 10.7 - -
-
Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 4.6 4.5 5.3 5.2 55 - -
Bank Hcight Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 4.7 3.8 3.9 4.7 3.9 4.0 - -
^ .- • R ,@ •,':r. M , �' ick. e rg.,
_ \ "
1 :
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 7 Station: 109+57
Reach Name: South Mudd Creek XS T A l e: Riffle
1270 ■
1269 - '
Ira d 1268 I
- 1267 �`Fr
tg 1266 - . \ /I ,
1265 !J `
1264 - -
1253
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95
Station (feet)
MY MY MY2 MY3 MY4 - MY5 1-RK1--
CI1AN NU,DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MVO MY1 V1Y2 MY3 MY4 MY5 \1Y6 \IY7
Bankful Width(ft) 31.0 312 34.0 29.1 36.2 33.7 - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.9 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.9 - 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.4 - -
13ankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft") 64.9 67.7 67.9 57.9 64.9 64.9-
-Width Depth Ratio 14.8 14-4 17.0 14.6 20.2 17.5 - -
Fntrenchment Ratio 2.8 2.8 2.6 3.0 2.4 2.6 - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.3 3.2 3.2 - -
it + ... •
04040
" ,..,,,A.•.;: .: T..4.4.
Left Descending Bank N!Hu I i.,L end Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 8 Station: 302+13
Reach Name: Upper Iva Branch XS Type: Pool
1291
1290 II
d 1289
..• 1288
g
1287 '
1286
1285
1284 1
0+00 0-t05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+311 0+35
Station(fret)
MY0 MYI MY'_ MY3 MY4 MY5 FRKF
CHANNFd.DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MVO MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY% W1Y7
Bankful Width(ft) 5.5 5.8 5.6 6.4 6.9 6.5 - -
Floodpronc Width(ft) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.9 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1-8 I 7 1-7 1-5 1.6 1.5 - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(h") 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.0 5.7 5.7 - -
WidthDepthRatio 5-4 6.1 5.5 8.1 8-4 7.4 - -
Entrenchment Ratio 3.1 29 3.1 2.7 2-5 2.6 - -
I Bank Hcight Ratio 1.0 0.9
1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8
�,t�• Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 3.1 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.3
- -
-
Zvi.;.° � -r - r , `9 O-.:'• T y
Y4 ‘
'4 � . - �i� .) - i{ .•tit .. ..r.� �Y�T.
•
1 _ma ;, {s
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 9 Station: 302+82
Reach Name: Upper Iva Branch XS Type: Riffle
1288
E
-
1284
0+00 0+05 11+10 0-15 0+20 0+25 0+30 ii +5
Station (feet)
MYD MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 - MY5 B1CF
C'IIANNFI.DIMENSIONS SUMMARY MYO MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS \IV6 \rl'7
Rankin]Width(ft) 4.6 4.2 4.i 7.3 5.2 5.6 - -
Floodprone Width(ft) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 - -
nankful]Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.7 0.6 _ 0.8 0.8 I 0.6 0.6 - -
BankfullCress-SectionalArea(h") 1.9 1.8 2.1 2.7 1.9 1.9 - -
-
WidthDepth Ratio 11.0 9.$ 8.0 20.2 14.8 16.4 - -
-
Entrenchment Ratio 3.0 3.3 3.5 1.9 2.7 2.5 - -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 3.0 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 - -
- 1 Fw• w'
3 r
. Y 5 ... .;�: .'� :al
�,� � �
i iS
kl:eP '''‘.-
,may $`:,` 40. i . ..,., ..,,t.-. .417*,.. 4:::-.:7,.....,,,
t
Lett Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 10 Station: 304+20
Reach Name: Upper Iva Branch XS Type: Rifle
1281
1280
"1279
g
1278 _
al
1277 ' -
1276
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0-40 0+45
Station{feet)
11Y0 MYI MY'_ MY3 MY4 MY I-1(F
CHANNFd.DIMErNSIONS SUMMARY MVO MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 \1Y7
Bankful Width(ft) 5.3 5.6 5.8 3.8 - 4.5 6.1 - -
Floodpronc Width(ft) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 - -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 - -
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft') 2.1 I.9 2.5 1.7 2"1 2.1 - -
WidthTJepth Ratio 13.3 16.7 13.3 8.7 9.8 17.9 - -
Entrenchment Ratio 3.2 3.0 3.0 4.4 3.8 2.8 - -
Bank Hcight Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 0.9 0.9 - -
Low Top of Bank Depth(ft) 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 - 0.6 0.6 - 1 -
•
. 1‘,-,,.l.Y,;-:;k:',1 A.,1.:,-.',g6'4,glx•i:,.,,..4-:.- -:-1rc*A-'.1-.e.'1.;4.', 41
1 i"PWt, '' ..P i r-p,',/P..t. • ..p„.,. -.•
i c w
Ow
LL:11 [)c- 11t[u1 g Bank Right Descending 13a11k
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
South Muddy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 101+00 to 112+75.16
1273 -
1272 -
1271 A
-- •
—---
--- ------I Easement Break
1270 •
_—
--__
—————_ XS5-R Average Bankfull Slope
1269 _ • _—_ (Dashed ine)
;-----___ XS7-R
—_——
1268 AnniA\ '�,� • -----�__
fr
44ii 4 -—-\'.I.VIL1/4__ • ______
1267 - - r ph. --_-::---,-... .. •
itir„,1 , ,,
,......
1266 '1. ? - -- - -
o ‘ r f*,' ,,-, 1111W;-.......-----..s416,..
111111Wrig '‘Ailik 41111K
a.) 1264 • liwirrwir y I\10174, y
XS4-R ii.,0e,,,„,
1263 -
• •
1262 •
1261 •
•
1260 XS6-P
1259
1258
1257
1 ! 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
O O O O O 0 O O O 1 1 1 1
lx 1x ?x Yx Sx 6x �x �x 9x Ox "ex 1x �x
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TW-MY0 5/18/2016 TW-MY1 11/02/2016 TW-MY2 6/29/2017 TW-MY3 10/24/2018 MY4 MY5 Structure-MY0 BKF . BKF ---- WS ———-Linear(BKF) Linear(WS)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Sprouse Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 201+72.34 to 208+91.81
1290
1289 Begin Middle Sprouse Branch
1288 201+72
1287 •
1286
1285 XS1-R
1284
•
1283 - •
1282 • ---- ` •
= •••1281 • XS2-R
1280 - :'=�- _ •
•
• �' XS3-P
1279 :_ - -'1.
1278 ' •
y 1277 • ,
1276 . Average Banlull Slope
• �'� - • (dashed line)
= 1275 \� 4�
0
et 1274 •
• /• -__
Begin Lower Sprouse Branch '''I ►i•� , • _, ',
1273 203+49
'• N•-- �• _►1272 - • •
1271 ��'` -- __
1270 • -`--=�•
1269 , t�� .
1268 •..
1267
1266
1265
1264
1263
1262
1261
1260
20lx o 203)<o 20i 20is xis �xSO 2�rxSO 206xsO 20jxSO
TW-MYO TW-MY1 TW-MY2 TW-MY3 TW-MY4 • TW-MY5 o Structure-MY0 • BKF ---- WS Linear(WS)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Iva Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 300+79.55 to 307+17.78
1295 - —
1294 -
1293
1292 Begin Upper Iva Branch
1291 302+14
12 \t •
1289 89
1288 • •
1287 Milt
1286 I"i • •
1285 �`�- •
u
1284 1
1283 • -
1282 ``�
1281 •
'
12790 • • „ ` jr•1 Average Bankfull Slope
1278
0 XS8-P XS9-R %� (Dashed Line)
11
1277 ;; ,, • •
1276
1275 \�_�
— _
1274 s
1273 •
1272 ��
1271 XS10-R i*.
1270
r`
1269 it.,•
��
-
1268 'N � .
1267 ` •
�i 4'' A
1266 0, ,.
1265 • � - ` 0
1264 Begin Lower Iva Branch `i
1263 305+40
1262
1261
1260 ,
i0Ox o �0,x o i'02x o �Q�xSO �evx o i0Sx o �06x o 30jxso
TW-MY0 5/18/2016 TW-MY1 11/03/2016 TW-MY2 7/12/2017 TW-MY3 10/24/2018 TW-MY4 • MY5 0 Structure-MY0 • BKF ---- WS Linear(BKF) Linear(WS)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
Monitorin • Year - 2020; MY5
Bed Surface Material % %
Particle Size Class (mm) Number Individual Cumulative
0 - 0.062 0 0.0% 0%
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.0% 0%
0.125 - 0.25 0 0.0% 0%
0.25 - 0.5 4 4.0% 4%
0.5 - 1 .0 5 5.0% 9%
1 - 2 2 2.0% 11%
2 -4 0 0.0% 11%
4 - 8 0 0.0% 11%
8 - 16 9 8.9% 20%
16 - 32 24 23.8% 44%
32 - 64 35 34.7% 78%
64-128 20 19.8% 98%
128-256 2 2.0% 100%
256-512 0 0.0% 100%
512-1024 0 0.0% 100%
1024-2048 0 0.0% 100%
2048-4096 0 0.0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0.0% 100%
Total 101 100% 100%
Summary Data
D50 36
D84 74
D95 110
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Pebble Count-Percent Cumulative
Cross-Section 4-Riffle
100% /. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
90%
80%
t MY1 Cumulative%
70% tMY2 Cumulative%
2 tMY3 Cumulative%
w
N 60%
in / tMY4 Cumulative%
.o
50% fMY5 Cumulative%
40%
c
30%
20%
1
10% —
0%
O 1' b �b ,y( ,�'L ob ,tiW y( ,y'L ,yb b4b �(
O Oti '�' 1 1V O;l, O5 y tiO bO o
O, i by ptih py 1 "� ( ,'L ,L5 yy'L" yP 9c, 0e
000 Oti yp 'L
Particle Size Groups
Middle South Muddy
Pebble Count-Percent Individual
Cross-Section 4-Riffle
100%
90%
80%
•MY1%by Size Group
70% •MY2%by Size Group
2 •MY3%by Size Group
w
m 60%
ti •MY4%by Size Group
o
50% •MY5%by Size Group
40%
m
30%
20%
10%
0% I • I _ JIIILIM — 1111 111 :,
(C1' ,Lh ,y5 h b ,�( 1' (b ,tiW y( titi ,tib bW �(
O Oti O 5 y ti b �, (, ti b1 O;L ( y yO bO ago
i . Oti 1 '� ( 1ti - ',,,ti O,tia pb4i Oe
OO(O Oti y 'L
Particle Size Groups
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Monitorin • Year - 2020; MY5
Bed Surface Material % %
Particle Size Class (mm) Number Individual Cumulative
0 - 0.062 1 1 .0% 1%
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.0% 1
0.125 - 0.25 5 5.0% 6%
0.25 - 0.5 12 12.0% 18%
0.5 - 1 .0 9 9.0% 27%
1 - 2 0 0.0% 27%
2 -4 0 0.0% 27%
4 - 8 5 5.0% 32%
8 - 16 16 16.0% 48%
16 - 32 21 21 .0% 69%
32 - 64 22 22.0% 91
64-128 9 9.0% 100%
128-256 0 0.0% 100%
256-512 0 0.0% 100%
512-1024 0 0.0% 100%
1024-2048 0 0.0% 100%
2048-4096 0 0.0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0.0% 100%
Total 100 100% 100%
Summary Data
D50 18
D84 49
D95 84
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Pebble Count-Percent Cumulative
Cross-Section 5-Riffle
100% —U • • • • •
90% /�//
80% Ji
t MY1 Cumulative%
70% f MY2 Cumulative%
2 f MY3 ive
m• 60%
ti t MY4 CumulatCumulative
o
• 50% - fMY5 Cumulative%
▪ 40%
30%
■
20% r'
10%
b'1, ti5 by Oh ,10 'L b W ,G .'L !op,
O. O. O ti ti k 4i ti b b' Oy 10 tiO bO aio
O' 6ti �5' O�y Oy, ti 3 6 titi ,ti5 ytiti O;), Obi �¢
00 O 1
Particle Size Groups
Middle South Muddy
Pebble Count-Percent Individual
Cross-Section 5-Riffle
100%
90%
80%
•MY1%by Size Group
70% •MY2%by Size Group
2
•MY3%by Size Group
w
m 60%
ti •MY4%by Size Group
o
50% •MY5%by Size Group
a
▪ 40%
30%
20%
Obti ,y'L5 O•Ly Oy ,yO ,,,;L .i R k;b ,y�O '�'L rOR 1�W LSO �k'L O�'k Obi O�iG oc
O O O �ep O,Lc� Oy cb � ti „b ,4 ,t,( ,ti k'1, bib 0¢Di
006 01 h 10 ,tiO
Particle Size Groups
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Cross Section 7 - Riffle
Monitorin • Year - 2020; MY5
Bed Surface Material % %
Particle Size Class (mm) Number Individual Cumulative
0 - 0.062 0 0.0% 0%
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.0% 0%
0.125 - 0.25 0 0.0% 0%
0.25 - 0.5 8 7.7% 8%
0.5 - 1 .0 25 24.0% 32%
1 - 2 1 1 .0% 33%
2 -4 1 1 .0% 34%
4 - 8 2 1 .9% 36%
8 - 16 11 10.6% 46%
16 - 32 21 20.2% 66%
32 - 64 30 28.8% 95%
64-128 5 4.8% 100%
128-256 0 0.0% 100%
256-512 0 0.0% 100%
512-1024 0 0.0% 100%
1024-2048 0 0.0% 100%
2048-4096 0 0.0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0.0% 100%
Total 104 100% 100%
Summary Data
D50 22
D84 43
D95 63
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy
Pebble Count-Percent Cumulative
Cross-Section 7-Riffle
100% /`'/. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
90%
80%
/ t MY1 e
70% tMY2 CumulativeCumulativ %%
2 / MY3 Cumulative%
m• 60%
ti tMY4 Cumulative%
o
4
• 50% fMY5 Cumulative%
▪ 40%
m
30%
20%
10%
0%
O'L .5 by 5 O 'L b �b ,C� ;1, Ob ,tiW C� ,'L ,yb b4, C�
O Oti O. 1 'L b 4 ti b'y 4'L o• yp 'LO bO t>
i by ptih py 1 � C� ,y1. ,L5 yy'" pyP 9c, 0e
000 Oti y 'L
Particle Size Groups
Middle South Muddy
Pebble Count-Percent Individual
Cross-Section 7-Riffle
100%
90%
80%
•MY1%by Size Group
70% •MY2%by Size Group
•MY3%by Size Group
w
m• 60%
ti •MY4%by Size Group
o
• 50% •MY5%by Size Group
▪ 40%
m
30%
20%
10% •
0% II II II di IL Jo_ LI. ill
OOti '5 .L5 Oy O 'L b b ,y<o .4'1' Ob ,tip hO ,y')' p,Lb bW
O. O. y O may, p ti ti k q- y� py ON%�. ��41" ��V" 1vb �b1 bb Oeato
O h'1• 1'1• p' S O O
O� O
Particle Size Groups
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 12.Verification of Bankfull Events
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project
South Muddy Creek
Feet Above
Bankfull Photo #
Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method Elevation (if available)
2/25/2016 Unknown' Wrack Lines Unknown -
10/27/2017 Unknown2 Wrack Lines Unknown -
2/13/2018 Unknown3 Wrack Lines Unknown -
11/1/2018 Unknown4 Wrack Lines Unknown -
5/9/2019 Unknown5 Wrack Lines Unknown -
4/27/2020 Unknown6 Wrack Lines Unknown 1&2
Sprouse Branch
Feet Above
Bankfull Photo #
Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method Elevation (if available)
3/23/2016 Unknown' Wrack Lines Unknown -
10/27/2017 Unknown2 Crest Gauge 1.08 -
2/13/2018 Unknown3 Crest Gauge 0.1
11/1/2018 Unknown4 Crest Gauge 0.4 -
5/9/2019 Unknown5 Crest Gauge 0.33 -
Iva Branch
Feet Above
Bankfull Photo #
Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method Elevation (if available)
2/25/2016 Unknown' Wrack Lines Unknown -
10/27/2017 Unknown2 Wrack Lines Unknown -
2/13/2018 Unknown3 Wrack Lines Unknown _
11/1/2018 Unknown Wrack Lines Unknown
1Potentia1 Date is 2/2/2016 3Potential Date is 2/11/2018 SPotential Date is 2/18/2019
2Potentia1 Date is 10/23/2017 4Potential Date is 10/18/2018 6Potential Date is 2/6/2020
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
J I 1 1 i 'y �Jhhh11
irik,.
-- _;•; ` li%/t ��� ° rls �' -' I.LL>�� � I_ ���-it � � !lam��r �
,:i 41,1i ,,-.t.',--:: -,. - _,,Vlif'11.:,0,1',41,t ,,-,,...-..-'''t-17-- Z.:F.,',,---. .„..-:. ;c4
�_ ti ':•'? .,, s.. 'I 'i• / k Tie �� �,e ,'j ..
ki
..4
l<1 ' r , , _,'" ''', 4'_.::11.,
t
AF`a '�' 6r .( �, Il v a r�-In t .
phi /
��ll"� a. v �4 Yj �- 1 � - ��Y J,I:i � i�IJ� � 6 ���
14-
Photo#1 - South Muddy Creek Wrack Lines
�� x C
�. � E c� i is � � �'1c' 1 � `e
! ' 1 y • is
T5 �
_ 4' � I- ICJj, I\ ( y` a
� Vi3 -I� �tI
�� , . �A `�� P-Ia' c_-
- -
4
Photo #2— South Muddy Creek, sediment deposits.
Figure 1.Daily Precipitation Totals for the Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site Project
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

3.5
3 Suspected Bankful Event
2/18-2/22/2020
z 2.5
u
0 2 I
ct
.2 1.5 -
s•
a i
.Le 1 -
0.5 -
0
.I 11 II _ I i l I I I_ ICI , 1H I Ii I IL L- I III.I . II I L II.I I- II
VO ^ V� ^ VO ^ VO ^ VO ^ VO ^ VZ S
^ V ^ V ^ V ^ VVOVOVO VO VO VO VO VO VO VOti 'y\'' pA‘ \tiA. A' o�A, .s, 7 �ti\. �'.\.
Figure 2.Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30'and 70'Percentiles for McDowell County
16.0
14.0—
12.0 -
N
U 10.0 •
U
C
= 8.0
0
i+
0_ 6.0 ..r .... 1... i •••• , .... .._ ...
L �_
4.0
..._I r
rrr _r .
2.0
0.0 I I i I 1 f I
.tan-20 Feb-20 Aar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20
NO Crones Mordt yRainfall ..•�•]Mh Percerrn. — 70tl1 PercmtlN A..y.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020

Middle South Muddy Iva Branch Perrenial Gauge
4
2 L1
4� Thalweg • i
0Mtk / JI1
1%1
1:1\i
liii I 1 k\t i li?)Y
'',Z i I I r
..
,0
1-4
t -6 I \L '
1 g
1\1;1 \I
10
12
14
!, 2 2 Y S 0. 8 $ IO II I2
I2O2 1202 I202 7202 I2O2 I202 I202 I2O2 I2O2 I2O ISO ��O
O O O O O O O O O 20 20 20
Middle South Muddy Iva Branch Intermittent Gauge
5
Thalweg
I\
-5 \ \II
\1 1111\ I I
i I I Iti
C -10
\ \
v 1-4
-15
,s \I\II 1 \ \'..
-20
-25
-30
-35
.� Y, S 0 i 8 I I
9 � I I
L2O2 �I2O2 1202 1202 1202 1202 L202 1202 L202 Ila 120 Y ego
O O O O O O O O O 20 20 20
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project Equinox
NCDMS Project No.93875 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 2020