20120202 Ver 1_More Info Received_20120229

Strickland, Bev
From: Michael Taylor [mtaylor @ stewart - eng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:14 PM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: RE: 12 -0202 Crabtree Creek Greenway
iev,
Please download the requested information from the following link.
https: // stewart- eng. sharefile .com /d /s724dfbb2d0047dl8
Thanks,
Michael Taylor, PE, LEED AP I Roadway Engineer
Direct 919.866.4736
STEWART
Engineering. Innovation. Solutions.
From: Strickland, Bev [ mai Ito: bev.strickland(ci)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:07 AM
To: Michael Taylor
Subject: 12 -0202 Crabtree Creek Greenway
Mr. Michael.
Could you send me an electronic copy of the information you sent in the binder?
Thanks
Bev
Beverly Strickland, Administrative Officer
Division of Water Quality - Prograin Development
N.C. Department of Finironnient and Natural Resources
Mail Seri -ice Center 1650, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Phone# 919 - 807 -6350
Email Address: Bev.Stricklamd@ncdenr
Phone # [phone]
E -mail correspondence to aid from this address may he subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to d d parties.

Iona L. Thomas, AICP
Stewart Engineering, Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
27 December 2010
Re: Neuse River Trail Project — Johnston/Wake County line to Anderson Point segment; Walnut Creek
segment; Crabtree Creek segment, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Thomas:
This letter provides the US Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) response to your December 1, 2010 requests
for comments on the Johnston/Wake County line to Anderson Point segment, Walnut Creek segment, and
Crabtree Creek segment of the Neuse River Trail Project in Wake County, North Carolina. Our comments are
submitted in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended;
16 U.S.C. 661 -667d) and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The proposed project involves construction of approximately 9.8 miles of new greenway consisting of a 10-
foot wide paved trail, 13 sections of new boardwalk, and 11 pedestrian bridges over low areas and unnamed
tributaries, one pedestrian bridge over the Neuse River, one pedestrian bridge over Walnut Creek, and one
pedestrian bridge over Crabtree Creek. Construction of the trail will involve clearing and grubbing, grading,
placement of subgrade material and asphalt paving. The bridges over the Neuse River, Walnut Creek and
Crabtree Creek will be constructed on 5.5 -foot diameter piers with boardwalk and graded approaches, as
appropriate, and will not require any in- stream construction.
There is an historical record of the federally endangered Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) near
the confluence of the Neuse River and Crabtree Creek, and the natural resources investigation documented that
potentially suitable habitat exists for the Dwarf wedgemussel in the Neuse River, possibly where the crossings
are proposed. However, since the project will have no direct stream impacts (i.e., no in- stream construction),
the Service could concur with a "not likely to adversely affect" determination for the Dwarf wedgemussel.
In addition, as mentioned in previous correspondence (Skycrest to Horseshoe segment, 06 Oct 2010), the
Service would like to see the NC Wildlife Resources Commission's recommendations for porous pavement,
maintaining buffers, avoiding impacts to streams and wetlands, and installing sediment and erosion control
measures prior to land clearing or construction to be followed. These efforts will help to minimize impacts to
aquatic and terrestrial resources.
Thank you for your cooperation with our agency in protecting federally- listed species. If you have any
questions or comments, please feel free to contact Sarah. McRae at (919) 856 - 4520x16.
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor

i� �� �' .�:i • ,11`x,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
January 27, 2011
Michael Taylor
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Environmental Report, Neuse River Trail, Wake County, ER 09 -0167
Dear Mr. Taylor:
Office of Archives and History
Division of H storical Resources
David Brook, Director
Thank you for your transmittal of the environmental report by ESI, Inc. dated December 3, 2010, in
connection with the Neuse River Trail. We apologize for the delay in our response.
The environmental report includes a preliminary cultural and archaeological resource assessment based on
information in our files and some of our earlier correspondence with ESI, Inc. concerning the Neuse River
Greenway. No actual field survey was conducted for archaeological resources. The report would have been
much more useful if it had contained a map indicating the locations of the proposed greenway and the features
discussed.
Contrary to a statement in the report, documentation on archaeological sites 31WA1359 and 31WA1360 is not
incomplete. Data recovery excavations were completed at both of these sites in connection with the North
Carolina Department of Transportation Knightdale Bypass project. Copies of the resulting reports are on file
at the Office of State Archaeology. As the environmental report was written in February 2010, it does not
include our comments of July 27, 2010, requesting information regarding the size of the proposed parking lots
and trailheads and a recommendation for archaeological survey and evaluation.
It would also be helpful to know the regulatory requirements for this project. If permits are required from the
US Army Corps of Engineers, have they defined the permit area and the area of potential effect (APE)? If
there is federal involvement, the project will be subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act. Please forward this information at your earliest convenience.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807- 6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.

S
wn w.sti•w.irt- cny.cvm
ST E WA R T February 16, 2011
Justin Kockritz, Deloris Hall, Renee Gledhill - Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617
Re: Environmental Report, Neuse River Trail, Wake County, ER 09 -0167,
ER 10 -0989, ER 10 -1125, ER 10 -1353, ER 10 -1783, ER 10 -2259, ER 10-
2276, ER 10 -2277
To whom it may concern:
Stewart Engineering, Inc., on behalf of the City of Raleigh, is seeking further
comment from the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on the
proposed Neuse River Trail Project in Wake County, North Carolina. Additional
information is being provided related to sites specifically questioned in previous
correspondence with NCSHPO.
The project will require a nationwide 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers,
as well as a 401 permit from Division of Water Quality. The permit area is
approximately 20 feet wide for the entire length of trail (10 feet from edge of
pavement on both sides of trail) and includes all jurisdictional waters crossed by the
project. Federal funding is only associated with the Anderson Point to Skycrest
Segment. No federal funding or involvement currently associated with the other
segments of the project and it is not expected that those segments of the project
will be subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
The initial project review was only related to the actual trail, and in a letter dated
March 10, 2009 NCSHPO noted that the following sites may be affected by the
greenway construction: 31WA27, 31WA214, 31WA519, and 31WA1617 (See Exhibit
1). As trail segments were finalized, more detailed information was sent to
NCSHPO. These segments as reviewed are:
1. Anderson Point to Skycrest
2. Knightdale Connection
3. Wake Forest Connection
4. Skycrest
5. Johnston County to Anderson Point
6. Walnut Creek
7. Crabtree Creek
A separate review of the Public Access Areas was completed, and in a letter dated
July 27, 2010 NCSHPO noted that the following sites may be affected by the
greenway construction: 31WA27, the last trailhead in Wake County (Mial Plantation
Road), and 31WA1625. The letter also calls attention to site 31WA0288 which is
the Hickory View Farm site. (See Exhibit 4)
ENGINEERING. INNOVATION. SOLUTIONS.T" 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET RALEIGH, NC T 919.380.8750
SUITE 400 27601 F 919.380.8752

�V
STEWART
Anderson Point to Skycrest:
Information relating to the Anderson Point to Skycrest segment was submitted for
further review on May 26, 2010. This segment contained additional information
relating to 31WA1677, and 31WA519. In a letter from NCSHPO dated June 17,
2010 the findings were that no historic resources would be affected by the project
(See Exhibit 2).
Knightdale Connection:
Information relating to the Knightdale Connection segment was submitted for
further review on June 18, 2010. In a letter from NCSHPO dated July 09, 2010 the
findings were that no historic resources would be affected by the project (See
Exhibit 3).
Wake Forest Connection:
Information relating to the Wake Forrest Connection segment was submitted for
further review on July 20, 2010. In a letter from NCSHPO dated August 11, 2010
the findings were that no historic resources would be affected by the project (See
Exhibit 5).
Skycrest Segment:
Information relating to the Skycrest segment was submitted for further review on
September 17, 2010. This segment contained additional information relating to
31WA519. In a letter from NCSHPO dated October 25, 2010 the findings were that
no historic resources would be affected by the project (See Exhibit 6).
Johnston County to Anderson Point Segment:
Information relating to the Johnston County to Anderson Point segment was
submitted for further review on December 1, 2010. In a letter from NCSHPO dated
February 04, 2011 two areas of concern were noted. 31WA214 ** consists of fish
weirs and traps within the river as well as a possible mill and dam on land.
31WA663 ** Griffis Mill Complex adjacent to the Randleigh Farm property. An
archeological survey was recommended for both sites. Additional information was
also requested for the last trail head in Wake County (Mial Plantation Road) (See
Exhibit 8).
Crabtree Creek Segment:
Information relating to the Crabtree Creek segment was submitted for further
review on December 1, 2010. In a letter from NCSHPO dated February 02, 2011
the findings were that Atkins Fish Trap may be affected by a bridge installation,
but that no historic resources would be affected by the project (See Exhibit 9).
It was further noted that sites 31WA1359 AND 31WA1360 have been subjected to
data recovery excavations associated with the Knightdale Bypass construction (See
Exhibit 9).
Walnut Creek Segment:
Information relating to the Crabtree Creek segment was submitted for further
review on December 1, 2010. In a letter from NCSHPO dated February 02, 2011
2

�v
STEWART
the findings were that site 31WA214 ** may be affected by the proposed greenway,
but that the project will not have an effect on any historic structures. An
archeological survey was recommended for both sites (See Exhibit 10).
Additional information provided:
A comprehensive quad map has been provided showing the entire trail alignment
(Figure 1), along with detail sheets at 1000:1 for the trail and referenced sites.
These figures are followed by detailed plan sheets showing the trail construction in
the vicinity of the site.
• Figure 1 - Overall trail alignment.
• Figure 2 - Last trailhead in Wake County (Mail Plantation Rd.)
• Figure 3 - 31WA0228, Randleigh Farm Property (31WA633 * *)
• Figure 4 - 31WA214
• Figure 5 - Atkins Fish Trap, 31WA1359, 31WA1360
• Figure 6 - 31WA1677, 31WA27, 31WA519
• Figure 9 - 31WA1617
The following matrix is a comprehensive listing of the sites referenced in the
responses from NCSHPO. The matrix also provides direction to a detailed plan
sheet showing the greenway construction in the area of the site.
The rows highlighted in gray denote sites that we do not believe will be affected by
the trail construction. The rows with blue text denote the segment of the trail that
has federal funding. Please provide comment on all of the sites below.
Portions of this project are scheduled to go out for construction bid in February
2011. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or need further
details mtaylor @stewart - eng.com or (919) 866 -4736.
Sincerely,
STEWART ENGINEERING, INC.
M i,G{� a L Tay lo-r
Michael Taylor, PE
Attachments
cc: Vic Lebsock, City of Raleigh Greenway Planner
3

The rows highlighted in gray denote sites that we do not believe will be affected by the trail construction.
The rows with blue text denote the segment of the trail that has federal funding.
STEWART
4
National
Historic
Plan
SHPO
Register
SHPO
Sheet #
Ref #
Letter
SHPO #
Trail Section
Description
Status
Recommendation
Stewart Comments
Last trail head
Provide site plans to
Johnston
in Wake
determine if Arch
?
County Line to
County
survey required (letter
1
SITE
3/10/2009
ER -09 -0167
Anderson Point
(Clayton Quad)
Unassessed
dated 7/27/2010)
Plans sheet is provided
Johnston
Site is not affected. Trail is on
31WA0288
County Line to
Hickory View
On State
Submit site plan if
east side of road, site is on
2
SITE
2/4/2011
ER 10 -2259
Anderson Point
Farm
Study List
property is effected
west side of road.
Griffis Mill
Johnston
Complex near
Recommend arch
Provided design of trail across
31WA633 **
County Line to
Randleigh Farm
Considered
survey (letter dated
property. Please review and
3 -8
SITE
2/4/2011
ER 10 -2259
Anderson Point
property
Eligible
2/4/2011)
comment if survey required.
Recommend arch
3/10/2009
ER -09 -0167
Johnston
survey (letter dated
31WA214 **
2/2/2011
ER -10 -2276
County Line to
2/2/2011 & letter
Trail does not appear to be
9
SITE
2/4/2011
ER 10 -2259
Anderson Point
Mill & dam site
Unassessed
dated 2/4/2011)
impacting sites.
Atkins Fish
Near Anderson
Trail does not appear to be
10
Trap
2/2/2011
ER 10 -2277
Crabtree Creek
Pt. Park
Unassessed
impacting sites.
Has been subject to
recovery excavations
as it was affected by
31WA1359
construction of
Site previously excavated. No
11
SITE
2/2/2011
ER 10 -2277
Crabtree Creek
Eligible
Knightdale Bypass
further action anticipated.
Has been subject to
recovery excavations
Site is out of construction area
as it was affected by
and has been previously
31WA1360
construction of
excavated. No further action
11
SITE
2/2/2011
ER 10 -2277
Crabtree Creek
Eligible
Knightdale Bypass
anticipated.
4

The rows highlighted in gray denote sites that we do not believe will be affected by the trail construction.
The rows with blue text denote the segment of the trail that has federal funding.
STEWART
National
Historic
Plan
SHPO
Register
SHPO
Sheet #
Ref #
Letter
SHPO #
Trail Section
Description
Status
Recommendation
Stewart Comments
Don't know exact location.
Site North of
Based on description site
31WA1625
Milburnie
should be out of construction
12
SITE
7/27/2010
ER -09 -0167
Hedingham
Bridge
Unassessed
area.
Not
mentioned
in
response
Site North of
No recommendation
31WA1677
letter
Milburnie
for actions per letter
Site is out of construction
12
STRUCTURE
7/27/10
ER -09 -0167
Hedingham
Bridge
Not Eligible
dated 7/21/10
area.
Recommend arch
31WA27
3/10/09
ER -09 -0167
survey (letter dated
13
SITE
7/27/10
ER -09 -0167
Hedingham
At trail head
Unassessed
2/4/2011)
Trail head can be moved.
Site is in the Hedingham
31WA519
Near end of
Neighborhood, out of project
14
SITE
3/10/2009
ER -09 -0167
Hedingham
segment
Unassessed
limits.
Boardwalk is being installed in
31WA1617
At Horseshoe
this area. Pile driving will be
15
SITE
3/10/2009
ER -09 -0167
Skycrest
farm bridge
Unassessed
the distrubing activity.

STATE
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
lscrer B. Sandbeck, Admiuist.'atnr
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govcrnor
Unda q. Carlisle, secretary
Jeffrey J. Craw, Mputy Secretary
March 10, 2009
Scott Seibel
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Re: Lower Neuse Greenway, Wake County, ER 09 -0167
Dear Mr. Seibel:
Office of Archives and I Iistory
1)ivision of 11mtorical Resources
David H x)k, Direernr
Thank you for your letter of January 28, 2009, concerning the above project. We apologize for the delay in our
response, We have reviewed our snaps and files and offer the following comments.
With regard to archaeological resources, the proposed 28 mile greenway contains various probabilities for the
presence of archaeological resources. A long portion of the proposed greenway on the Raleigh East quadrangle
map has already been surveyed prior to construction of a sewer line, as well as a portion of the greenway south
of Milburnie to below US 64. Of the eleven recorded archaeological sites that may be affected by the
greenway, four (31WA27, 31WA214, 31WA519 and 31WAl617) have not been evaluated for their eligibility
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The remaining seven sites are either not eligible or
have been the subject of data recovery excavations.
There are also archaeological resources that may be appropriate for interpretation for users of the greenway.
Brazier's 1820 map shows the locations of several fish weirs or traps and darns in Crabtree and Walnut Creeks
and similar sites are known along the Neuse River.
As plans regarding location, past ground disturbance and construction techniques become available, we
recommend consultation with our office to determine if any recorded sites will be affected and if any
archaeological survey should be conducted prior to greenway construction. We would also be glad to consult
regarding opportunities for interpretation of the archaeological resources along the greenway corridor.
As there are also many recorded structures or historic properties in the area, we would like the opportunity to
review the final location of the greenway.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preseinration kct and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 Cl°lt
Part 800.
Location: IG9 Fast Jones Street, Ralcigh W-1 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 61ai1 Sen -ice Center, Raleigh NC 27649 -4617 Telephone /Fax: {] 19) 807-6570/907 -0599
Cxt;161 -r A-

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above conuncnt,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this }project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
C"U \4aa - "Ll-t
-r ter Sandbeck
z'X'q1

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey j. Crow, Deputy Secretary
June 17, 2010
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
%,oc,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Neuse River Trail Project, Anderson Point to Skycrest Segment, EL-51001A, Wake County,
ER 10 -0989
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Thank you for your letter of May 26, 2010, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite tile. above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
eter Sandbeck
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

H
1VIE Q
1111 �:
END PROJECT Jg� �g !I Lu
31 WA519 C�,Q' U)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE \�
UNASSESSED FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY C*
SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
❑NSTRUCTION LIMITS) MI LUPLANT
LOCATION APPROXIMATE
(BUILDING (STRUCTURE)
NKNOWN NATIONAL
REGISTER ELIGIBILITY
�SITE APPEARS TO BE
UTSIDE OF
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS)
31 WA27
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE
UNASSESSED FOR (f�3
NATIONAL REGISTER MILUPLANT
{EgLIGIBILITY (LOCATION APPROXIMATE
CONSTRUCTISON LIMITS) UBNKNONWGN NATTIONALRE} �y
REGISTER ELIGIBILITY
RSIT APPEARS 70 BE
U7SE IOE OF
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS}
�hU
BUS N y
sa
WA1677 W
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE
[BUILDING STRUCTURE)
NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER .
SITE IS OUTSIDE OF !►aj
ONSTRUCTION LIMITS)
�U
0
^I
I
n
•. o
BEGIN y
PROJECT °
u�
n
84
I-xyf6/r Z

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
July 9, 2010
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
t V DAB
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Knightdale Connection to Neuse River Trail, EB- 5002A, Wake County, ER 10 -1125
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Thank you for your letter of June 18, 2010, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 - 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Peter Sandbeck
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

I'
1�
EL- 51001A �' Lu
NEUSE RIVER TRAIL
ANDERSON POINT TO
SKYCREST SEGMENT ; z
fi
E
A
WA 1361
SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
�
DNSTRUCTION LIMITS] +'
I
1
i
MILUPLANT
LOCATION APPROXIMATE
SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
ONSTRUCMN LIMITS]
1
J
GAOUGH'S FISH TRAP
UNASSESSED FOR
NAT30NAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
{SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS]
s
t
END
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
_ 64
lA ~
Q
w
�wU
Ucn
YL.�l
V
O
In
6
n
II
R
� Y'1
h
G
&nxffi r T 3
1,
1
l
GAOUGH'S FISH TRAP
UNASSESSED FOR
NAT30NAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
{SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS]
s
t
END
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
_ 64
lA ~
Q
w
�wU
Ucn
YL.�l
V
O
In
6
n
II
R
� Y'1
h
G
&nxffi r T 3

STAr4
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. 5andbeck, Administrator
Beverly Raves Perdue, Govemor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
July 27, 2010
Scott Seibel
Environmental Services, Inc,
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, ITC 27610
'TAQ-V -\,P , Aa-0R
office of AtcNves and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Lower Neuse Greenway, Revised Horseshoe Farm Park Bridge and Trailheads and Parking Lots,
Wake County, ER 09 -0167
Dear Mr. Seibel:
Thank you for your letter of June 21, 2010, concerning the above project, We apologize for the delay in our
response.
The only recorded archaeological resources that may be affected by the proposed revisions are within the
vicinity of Milburnie Dam. 31 WA27 is likely to be affected and site 31 WA1625 may also be affected by the
proposed project. The proposed location of the last trailhead in Wake County has a high probability for the
presence of as yet unrecorded archaeological sites.
As noted in our letter of March 10, 2049, specific information regarding the size and dimensions of the
proposed faralities and the amount of ground disturbing activities to be undertaken, would be helpful in making
specific recommendations regarding appropriate archaeological investigations. Absent such information, if the
project requires federal and/or state permitting, we recommend archaeological survey of the area containing
the last trailhead in Wake County (Clayton Quad) and evaluation of sites 31 WA27 and 31 WA1625 if they will
be affected.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill - Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 - 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
�)� Peter Sandbeck
Location: 109 East joncs Strcct, Ucigh NC 2764] MaXmgAddress: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC: 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
August 11, 2010
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering, Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
�OF co,a t4ce -1 0-,4
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Neuse River Trail Project - Wake Forest Connection, Wake County, ER 10 -1353
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Thank you for your letter of July 20, 2010, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
60�( Peter Sandbeck
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: [phone] -6599
mr131~r

: Ste f ► 1
RIVER
BEGIN
UPPER INFUSE
PROJECT
GREEN WAY C URREN TL Y
UNDER CONSTRUCTION 31EISOU5
�SONSTRUCTSON LIMITS]
NOT ELIGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
PROJECT
AREA
r
r
r
.ti
r1
� I �11
1�
1�
til
I� 1�
SITES FOR 31 WA541, 31 WA572,
AND 31 WA573 ARE ALSO
REFERENCED AS BEING IN THE
PROJECT CORRIDOR. ALL ARE
NONELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC
REGISTER.
f�l-,Nk6r7
0
U
UV
ICA
vw
NW
�V
0
� g-
RI
y
o
Ln
{ 1 31
s
IS OUT
[[SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
CONSTRUCTkOH LIMITS)
sj„�,� � W
NOT ELIGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
END PROJECT-,
: Ste f ► 1
RIVER
BEGIN
UPPER INFUSE
PROJECT
GREEN WAY C URREN TL Y
UNDER CONSTRUCTION 31EISOU5
�SONSTRUCTSON LIMITS]
NOT ELIGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
PROJECT
AREA
r
r
r
.ti
r1
� I �11
1�
1�
til
I� 1�
SITES FOR 31 WA541, 31 WA572,
AND 31 WA573 ARE ALSO
REFERENCED AS BEING IN THE
PROJECT CORRIDOR. ALL ARE
NONELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC
REGISTER.
f�l-,Nk6r7
0
U
UV
ICA
vw
NW
�V
0
� g-
RI
y
o
Ln

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffncy J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
October 25, 2010
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Neuse River Trail, Skycrest to Horseshoe Farm, Wake County, ER 10 -1783
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Thank you for your letter of September 17, 2410, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Divisions of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 - 847 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracldng number.
Sincerely,
Peter Sandbeck
Lucation 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh AFC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail service Center, Raleigh AFC 27649 -4617 Telephone /Pax {914} 807- 6570/807 -6549
ExH16rr 6

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 -807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6�O(Claudia Brown
Exdl r a C'

31WA1611
51TE IS OUTSI OF
INSTRUCT LIMITS)
END PROJECT ALTERNATE F-
ALIGNMENT I Ix
31WA523 m as Q
(SITE Is ouTSIDE of -- -- 31 WA1137 2
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS} {SITE IS OUTSIDE OF 5.11! s & 3:
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS) LLJ
PREHISTORIC
EUGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER �l�11N
-- 31 WA657
SITE IS OUTSIDE Of
INSTRUCTION LIMITS)
PREHISTORIC
NOT ELIGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
dl
J
31WA574 - - -�
SITE IS OUTSIDE OF r'
INSTRUCTION LIMITS) W r
PREHISTORIC
NOT ELIGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER V
�yQ
31 WA598
(SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS)
PREHISTORIC
UNASSESSEDFOR Q
NATI E IG BI ITY EGISTER � [T� Fm W �
4Q1 Z
540
M
31 WA1681
{{SITE IS OUTSIDE OF F
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS)
BUILDINGISTRUCTURE
NOT ELIGILBE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER o
g-
31 WA519
SITE 1S OUTSIDE OF
ONSTRUC, IN LIMITS)
PREHISTORIC
UNASSESSED FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
BEGIN
PROJECT
ExHIQ )T L

r1 bm fb A-,v- 3C, i o4 f:7k/u- 9&fba -T
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crory, Deputy Secretary
January 27, 2011
Michael Taylor
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Environmental Report, Neuse River Trail, Ware County, ER 09 -0167
Dear Mr. Taylor:
Office of Archives and History
Division of.Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Thank you for your transmittal of the environmental report by ESI, Inc. dated December 3, 2010, in
connection with the Neuse River Trail. We apologize for the delay in our response.
The environmental report includes a preliminary cultural and archaeological resource assessment based on
information in our files and some of our earlier correspondence with ESI, Inc. concerning the Neuse River
Cxreenway. No actual field survey was conducted for archaeological resources. The report would have been
much more useful if it had contained a map Mi dicating the locations of the proposed greenway and the features
discussed.
Contrary to a statement in the report, documentation on archaeological sites 31WA1359 and 31WA1360 is not
incomplete. Data recovery excavations were completed at both of these sites in connection with the North
Carolina Department of Transportation Knightdale Bypass project. Copies of the resulting reports are on file
at the Office of State Archaeology. As the environmental report was written in February 2010, it does not
include our comments of July 27, 2010, requesting information regarding the size of the proposed parking lots
and trailheads and a recommendation for archaeological survey and evaluation.
It would also be helpful to know the regulatory requirements for this project. If permits are required from the
US Army Corps of Engineers, have they defined the permit area and the area of potential effect (APE)? If
there is federal involvement, the project will be subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act. Please forward this information at your earliest convenience.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Location: 109 East jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address- 4617 Mdl SeMce Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephoneff ax. (919) 867 - 6576/807 -6599
b`x r-m 8 IY 7

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. CarWe, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 4, 2011
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. 5andbc -* Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Direuor
Re: Neuse River Trail, Wake/Johnston County Lane to Anderson Point, Wake County, ER 10 -2259
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Thank you for your letter of December 1, 2010, concerning the above project. We apologize for the delay in
our response.
In terms of archaeological resources, there are two areas of concern along this portion of the proposed
greenway. As noted on your map, archaeological site 31 WA214 ** may be affected by the project. This site
consists of both fish weirs or traps within the Neuse River as well as a possible mill and dam on land. We
recommend an archaeological survey in this vicinity to ensure that the site will not be affected. If it cannot be
avoided, the site should be evaluated for its eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
Not shown on your map is archaeological site 31 WA663 * *, the Griffis Mill Complex. This site is located away
from the river adjacent to the Randleigh Farm property. The mill complex consists of the remains of a
nineteenth century grist mill, tail race, head race, former mill pond, miller's house remains, a well and remains
of another structure. This site is considered to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places. We recommend an archaeological survey in this vicinity to ensure that outlying features of the complex
are not affected. If they cannot be avoided, appropriate mitigation treasures need to be developed in
consultation with our office.
In June, 2010, we received a request for review of proposed trailheads and parking lots for the Neuse River
Greenway from Environmental Services, Inc. At that time, we recommended archaeological survey of the
location of the last trailhead in Wake County as it has a high probability for the presence of archaeological sites.
No parking lots or trailheads were identified on your project maps. If these elements are still part of the
project, we repeat our recommendation for a survey of that area.
We also requested information regarding the regulatory authority under which this greenway is being
constructed. I£ a permit is required from the US Asny Corps of Engineers, the gteenway would be subject to
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If so, please forward information to us regarding the
defused permit area and the defined area of potential effect (APE).
Location: 109 Past jonLs Street, Raleigh NC 27601 W1 ailing Address: 4617 M22 Service Center, Raleigh NC 27599.4617 Telephone/Pax (919) 807 - 6570/807.6599
'g—'xhf- 16 t"r

Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site forms,
should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are submitted by the consulting
archaeologist and well in advance of any construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.arch.dcr.state.nc.us /consults.htm. The archaeologists listed, or any other
experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
The trail, as proposed, will pass the Hickory View Farm (WA 0288), which is on the State Study hst—a
preliminary step in the review of potential nominations to the National Register of Historic Places. This
historic site is located on the west side of Brown Field Road (SR 2553), approximately 950 feet north of the
intersection with Old Baucom Road (SR 5204). If this segment of the trial is built within the existing right-of-
way of Brown Field Road, or if right -of -way is taken from properties on the east side of the road, the project
will have no effect on the historic property. If any right -of -way taking is proposed for the Hickory View Farm
property, please submit a site plan to our office for review and comment.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. if you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 - 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
�$ M10
6�3,Claudia Brown

b
ddb
END CT
PROJECT
WR POLLE MILL —
31 WA214
FISH VAERS
HISTORIC
UNASSESSED FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
b
y <
_Rg-
(1�
Bus
64
54
31 WA1522
[SITE IS OUTSIDE OF
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS}
PREHISTORIC
NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
1
70
7
fid
MILLIPLANT
'A ,.
BEGIN _
♦ ,gyp PROJECT
♦ CJ
'o
♦
•
f
ti
� a
moo
�vC)
�j
0
r
•
•
•
•
•
o°
� o
M
U o
0. 0
0
ILI
bx141 a rr 9

• ti
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor.
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 2, 2411
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Neuse River Trail, Walnut Creek Segment, Wake County, ER 10 -2276
Dear Ms. Thomas:
W Aua v,v tam %L
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Thank you for your letter of December 1, 2010, concerning the above cited project. We apologize for the
delay in our response.
With regard to archaeological resources, the possible troll and dam portion of site 31WA214 ** may be
affected by the proposed greenway. The site has not been evaluated for its eligibility for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places. We recommend that the greenway location in this vicinity be surveyed
by an experienced professional archaeologist to determine if site 31 WA214 ** will be affected. If so,
mitigation measures should be developed in consultation with our office.
We would also appreciate receiving information concerning the regulatory requirements for the project. If
permits are required from the US Army Corps of Engineers, please forward information regarding the permit
area and the area of potential effect (APE) as determined by the Corps.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site forms,
should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are submitted by the consulting
archaeologist and well in advance of any construction activities.
A List of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www. archarch .dcr.state.nc.us /oonsults.htm. The archaeologists listed, or any other
experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
We have detemlined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-
6599
t tiRtp'�fT

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 -807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely, p
601(Claudia Brown

6U5
6a �
w
V V)
44
BEGIN 64
PROJECT
C~ clll�
WR POLLE MILL --�
MILL/PLANT w
LOCATION APPROXIMATE
Q
�J
31 WA214
FISH WEIRS
40 HISTORIC
UNASSESSEO FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
END
PR ECT
0
O O
m
II
a
h
O
0. 0
N
n
O
N
6�Nfgrr I

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. 5andbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 2, 2011
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Neuse River Trail, Crabtree Creek Segment, Wake County, ER 10 -2277
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Cg*ps-s aC"E C eZr'- V.-
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Thank you for your letter of December 1, 2010, concerning the above cited project. We apologize for the
delay in our response.
Examination of our maps and files indicates that one of the proposed bridges may affect Atkins Fish Trap.
Your letter mentions that cultural resource investigations, among others, were conducted to aid in the
selection of the bridge locations. We request that you forward a copy of the cultural resource investigation
for our information. If the preliminary work done by Environmental Services, Inc. is the referenced
investigation, it consisted of a literature search as no archaeological field survey was involved. Information in
their report was taken primarily from our maps and files. You should note that archaeological sites
31 WA1359 and 31 WA1360 identified on your map as eligible for the National Register have been subjected
to data recovery excavations as they were adversely affected by the construction of the Krsightdale Bypass by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
There are areas of the Crabtree Creek Segment that may contain archaeological resources. It would be helpful
if you could forward information as to the regulatory requirements for the trail. Will permits be required
from the US Army Corps of Engineers? If so, what is the defined permit area and the area of potential effect
(APE)? If the project requires federal permits and is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we may recommend archaeological survey of portions of the project.
We would appreciate receiving a copy of the cultural resource investigation report as well as detailed mapping,
if available, of the trail in the vicinity of Atkins Fish Trap so we may determine if it will be affected and what
mitigation measures may be appropriate.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh N 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 'Telephone /Fax: [phone]-
6599
Cxo- 6, T— 10

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
60YClaudia Brown

5�7
BEGIN
PROJECT
as
? TER'S MILL LOCATION APPROXIMAT
31 V11A 1371
PREHISTORIC
NON ELIGIBLE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
aan
Bus
sa
31 WA1360 ----
PREHISTORIC
ELIGIBLE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
31 WA1372 --�
PREHISTORIC
NON ELIG18LE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
31WA1373
b
31 WA1359
PREHISTORIC r CONTAC
ELIGIBLE FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ATKINS FIS RAP
r UNASSESSEDFO
{� NATIONAL REGIST
ELIGIBILITY
-- 31WA 1
MILUPLANT J
LOCATION APPROXIMATE
GAOUGH'S FISH TRAP —
UNASSESSE❑ FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
11k11 _7 Jainm J IT, I IN:
31 WA214
FISH W1ERS
HISTORIC
UNASSESSED FOR
NATIONAL REGISTER
ELIGIBILITY
D
OJECT
F—
C�
haw
V
0
II
� o
-• o
V a
q� o
n
(� o
0
1�7 /143 1r 10

71N
. ... ..... .. .
41�
N.
0
rn
OLD MILBUR
rn
..N 1 rn ;NlE
jv
"A
r
RAN ­ji
UOK..
ui
0
ui
Z
RN
SKYCRESt.
4k
NE-WjPERN D.
G
Al
•
4Q
vo
91"
SSQ
z 0 u
rl u
211
POOLE
Legend
PLANSHE
Proposed Trail
Trailhead
- WX
W
Lu
,7 7,
VIC
GRASSHOPPER
Lu
R
Legend
PLANSHE
Proposed Trail
Trailhead
- WX
W
Lu
,7 7,
VIC
GRASSHOPPER
�74
14�
T
7
R
`4-
0,1
�74
14�
T
7
R
NEUSE RIVER TRAIL
0 2,4004,800 9,600 14,400 19,200
m Feet
1 inch = 5,417 feet
PROJECT: H9001.00
SHPO M ER09-0167
FIGURE
1

� •rte
1
1
Y
je
r ^L
f ;
Jq
t 1 �!
ell
f
r �r
l-
Legend
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.0
PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 400 800 1,600 2,400 3,200
Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Trailhead FIGURE 2

■ I , !� a' f
X251 � . � �-- l � .` ,
■ ■
/r
■ ' ■fIt■ i 0
Ir
7
f ► � t } f
►1 _ 6
24 4mrA
INN
IGH P P _
rz-Irm r \ '
~•� 4
fir. � •� � `^- " � �, �i � f - -ti
C
*, SID
ILI
f
A
Legend
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 400 800 1,600 2,400 3,200
Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Trailhead FIGURE 3

w � -� wfi f ■ r_
NX ti ■ 1 ■ f t.
PO
Jim
rF� �I■ �
l4 ��11
■Jill
■ r �
„--
r�
�4 a
O
f��. � �� �-. ^ : r � r .� � i=ce 1, ■ + �
��I 4r� rf.� 1 i fJ} f� � ■
y r �
4 i i� J f � f I � ■� r
R M
Ilk
ILI-
Krr I (A
z
9
oil
hill
X 308 x
■
r.
f
Ilk
N R
s
f
Legend
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
- PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000
= Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
- Trailhead FIGURE 4

f l 1 •s �
C
J
11 t�`��
v-
s
� ~---- ������s -- ---
C� 1 fit.
11 _
k 10 r
f-
cj
Mss A
o
r t r ~ =
k 20,0
—
1 r r ■ Iff OF
r \
eX
I ;^
ry
1
POOF
e M
Legend . �� •
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000
Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Trailhead FIGURE 5

� l
•
d
4
n f
X
t
f•7
AN-�
i J�
* '� �� ✓ 13
L
Z\ sj i lr i U
Fu N, N.) N
if
■ ��. r ice' -- . ��
►1
t 4�
14
12 __
4
182 r
r�
7
I [ 1921
� J f
or
T lr � •s �
�F
�1 z � O ■
} I
-r a I I ^, i
+
Legend
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
- PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000
= Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
• Trailhead FIGURE 6

92
11 y
In
■ P
■ r �I �,� � * + ■ ll r ■ ■ a
C) -�� _ —-
fl= -
NIL
of ■�
IL
. . , t l
■
Ci 1 r I i. ■ ■■ ■ � �y ��
IS
so
IF It
l
mil. �.. �� ■ ■ ■ ■ ��.... � / � `1
D ■
ILI
r}� ■ 9 ' ■ ■ ��!
ak
Al
> I>
jo-
r ti�..yy
Ift \N)
max! N 11
6 'w
rb14
Legend r 14 •�!._ r ,f
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000
Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Trailhead FIGURE 7

1 ■ ■
r ■ � Lt T7 iOp .
t
■ 'NIJ
of
t�
1 1
r
■ " J - ��
� 4
2
rr z2 t
If
IF
IL 0
.. M. ■ No 7�D
Nt
� � 44 � , � �l 4 � ■'■ I r � ��7
0 1 f
50 --•
Legend
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000
Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Trailhead FIGURE 8

h
MGEI CO
all� {
• '4 111 '• , � s
■
■
r
l
of " ■ � � l
IL a
a
a-
y ■ � s /
_ r .
f ■ *i i
■ � v
a r ;} *f�
V •G
IL
1 ■ `
r �
1 ■
r■
RJ
li ■
1
■
■
■
,
Rim
Legend
Cultural & Arch Resources N E U S E RIVER TRAIL PROJECT: H9001.00
PLANSHEETS SHPO #: ER09 -0167
0 375 750 1,500 2,250 3,000
Proposed Trail Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Trailhead FIGURE 9

O 4
- PAYED ANN WHEELER 'l ; .. �f
& KE ?H p/NTER y
. •� !\ `P Fir
lir . w :. 7,1 lop .1 C, \ � A 1 —11
�y
T
WERAN J
F� L
lj1 F F / �� ' / �%
i F F F
��i T I I i 2�g
1 p�
F� N 63 /5' 27.r E -Ll- STA. 81 +25.00 F
F T X12- S 00
PC $ %O/Qf /SQQ Ll -AiTA. 82+43..00
U1 F F
M D F F F F
6 au NSb.Po +93 / �\
-PIN 09N95RIt
I

alw- 1F N/F 1 .awl ... . .w 1 1 awl 1 1 1 1 1 —V--'Y -
1 C WAKE COUNTY 1 F F ' Jim
OB IlB.iT,PGl%1O F
&/ MMPG M81 L END BOARDWALK
_ FIN O41576M i GIN BOARDWALK L3- STA. 50 +00.00
IPSTA. 49 +60.00 F
I
F \ \ s
or
+ F
}• F F U1 t F
VF
M 9 F RALEIGH
M9 / �— F F %A17 T`
•PJN IT5p4IYj�S / p F V- „ c
/ F �. p \ � / F F �gq .� • ••
S SA14 / do
•'-
I
+ } t 4 -�} 0� tJ`P .
1 q ��
END BOARDWALK �, l \ 11� , �/ • , IL
-L3- STA 42 +05.00 • ,
.•
-� • _ _ ; Y•. _ _ s■ _6. 111
ir
DONN
r
ti
Nip x Randleigh Farm Property
JNJ �T 1 1.
1 • 1 � r� �1..� �— ti
i"
BZ
��1

STREAM SAM
47 p^�• j F F F r& 1 1
- � mss. — °Y. . _ �■ • — — � � .r 1
1 91 ti ti s r
T 1 L ■ �- 1L —
a'0 Randleigh Farm Property + r`
■ ° r -L3- CURVE Dara '
P/ STA57 +2924 Pl STA61 +(2B( PI STA65 +55.69 •P(STA67 +46.76 • C
D 419' 262' • (LTJ D - 8 38' 52.4' .7 D = N49 51E f LT J D = 28'38'52.,f fRTJ .. ®' • 1 �_
L = 589.65' L = 2662Y L = 209.66' L = 18539' - -
T = 363.09' T = 157A0' T = ((855' T =9996' r:
R = 4nn-OY R = PMIW R = IROIXY R = 1�
r
i

:L�m
w;,"t
ri
1
y_ pp SEA 5
�. f � k
0 1 Randleigh Farr
,T
x
0
•ti
•$ 4 • L
` •• n
J.
� Y Y
L
EST TONS CL W RIP RAP
SY F.F.
-L3- CURVE DATA - 24"H
P/ STA80+02.O6 PI STA69+46.30
LT) A = 69 55' 48.8' fRTI A = 32' 2222-r fLTI
D = 57'17'44B' D = 1419' 262'
L = 122A5' L = 226.OY
15�\Ai
/ rr a
II ii III
4/
Ilk
4. T�
T

r
i
0
-llr--�
•pl
I
f
Sul •
. 1 L
s 1
001 00 -a {
' - 1 \ - •
i
06 • • - F l.L Try =
-13-
F F
�\ F •
F
EST 5 TONS CL '8' RIP RAP \ \ '� F F �' •
EST 14 SY F.F. F _
Cat
PROPOSED 0'- 54' HDPE
L
property
1r A�
-LYG CURVE DA
86 +1191 P1 STA87 +83.43 P/ STA91 +25.44 P/ STA93 +299/
'06'51
-' (RT) A = 79.27' 46.3' (LT) A = 2T 58 59l (RT) A = 36' 42 2At4' (LT)
r 42'12Z D = 47' 44 47.3' D = 19'05'549 D = 14' l9' 262'
1462 L = 166.43' L = L 6'
'2.84' T = 9974' T =
W iAbL- R = 120.00', -- .: B-
iiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiE
i
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
I[m000[m000m [ 000 [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[[[[0
■[000m 000m[ 000m[ 000m[
000m [000m[[00[m000[m000m[000m[000m
m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m
m000 ■m000[m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m
Il11111111111111 [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
111
MEN
NE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
■1111111111111111111111111111!0
ii11iiim[
mmmiiiiiiiimmmmmmmm[ mmmm[ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Il rrrr! rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
'Nom
rrM'I!•i00m[000m[000m
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
onmomommomommom
m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
m000[ m000[ m000m[ 000m[ 000m[
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
000m [000m[[00[m000[m000m[000m[000m
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
m000[m000[m000.[000.[000mm
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
000 ■mmmm[m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m
rrrrr rrrrlrrrrlrrrrlrrrrrlrrrrlrrrr
[ m000[ m000m [000m[00[[m000[m00l/IGr0�.lr
Il rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
111111 ■11111111111111111111111
[[[[[[ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[_L'■0r0L
�T 1! \1R 701
:771111111111111111111■ 1111■
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
1111111111111111111■ 1111■ 11111111111111111111111111111■
1111■ 11111111111111■
11111111111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[a
111111■ 1111111111111111111■
MENEM
1111,/0 it 7111: 1' �J[
r[[[[[ r[[[[ r[[[[[[[[
[
r[[[[[ r[[[[ r[[[[[[[[ r[[[[ r[[[[[ r[[[[ r[[[[
r[[ [[r[[[[rr[[r[[[[r[[[[[r[[[[r[[[
[[[[[0[[[[0[[[[[0[[[[0[[[[[[[[0
[[[[r
[[[[r
[[[[r
[[[[[r[[[[r[[[r
�.\[[■ 1111111111111111111 ■111�s[rr[''...°.11■ 1111111111111111111 ■ 111r[[[1■ 1111111111111111111■ 1111■ 11111111111111111111111111111■
it ��a \l rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr ............... r rrrr lrrrrrrrrlrrrrl rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
1111■ 1111111111111111111■
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
1111■
rrrrr
1111111111111111111
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
■111111111111111111111111111111
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
[m000[ri: [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[momommomommomommom[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
■mmmm[mmmm[mmmm[mmmmm[mmmm[mmmm
[ m000[ m00■ ��[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
101111■ 11111 ■�� \[ 011001111■ 1111■ 1111■ 1111■ 1111101111011111111■ 1111■ 1111101111011111111■ 1111 ■111 ME MENE10ENE101111011110011011110111110111101111
:1_frill:Il
■I:ful'. \'J
11.01/.'
111' �11101111111101111011110111101111101111
■m000[m000[m000[m00on[000m[000m
MENEM
Il rrrr! rrrrr rrr ■.'•\rllrrrrl rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr
[ m000[ m000m[ 000m■■!\ m000 [m000[m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m m000[ m000[ m000m[ 000m[ 000m[
rrrrr rrrrr
000m [000m[[00[m000[m000m[000m[0m[1
rrrrr
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr lrr____________________
lr !rrrr
rrrrr rrrrr
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[a
rrrrr rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
I[m000[m0m0m[mm0mm00m■� ig r0[m000[m000m m000m[000m[000m m000[ m000[ nommmmm0mm [0mmmm0m0[m000[10mmmmm0mm[mm0m
I[m000[m000m [000m [00[[ 00ii�� aC�C 7CCC7 L..9■r00m■ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[ m000m[ 000m[ 000m[
[000m [000m
000m[
[[00[m000[m000m [000 Mim Wrmisi0iliVmmliLr
000m[[ 00[■ rrr[[rrr[[rrr[[0m ■�70C1
■�I.Ilil
IlY00m[000m[0010
mil[[[[[[[[[[[[
■m000[m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m
ENrrr
o11101111m000
[m000m[000m[000m
101111011111011110110011110 CNns_!■ r\ 11110 rraG2! ■001 -_foo nnnnnoou0000rl0000uoo oou000rororurrrroouoo0110L
Il rrrr!rrrrr!rrrr 1001!rrrr! w— ...........cam... ^_-== '- .CL! \rrl rrrr!rrrrr!rrrr!rrrr rrrr!rrrr!rrrrr!rrrr:rrrr!rrrr
lr'LJIF
'�1r10
9l:GC 36MIN'0Ilrrrr!rrrr lrr MEN
LL'YG�
■1111011110mml:lo
lr������������------
IItl11:A I7S�l.'dIl':
✓LIII1011110111110111101110
=aorrrrrlrrrrlrrrr
I[ [rrr[ [rrr[ [rrr[ [00[[ [rrr[ mr rrr [rrr! R�i7i �i -i�L7 [rrr[ [1r�_ 7���\ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[ [ rrr[
I[ m000[ m000m [000m [00[[ m000[ m000[ m000L' ac6LJ JSL'G7 nnnnn a.�.00� ��q[ nnnnn nnnnn m000[ ..............................IN
[ rrr[ [imYm
rrr[
[[IWYr atria a000m [rrr[ [mm [[ [ rrr[
m nnnnn [mm [m m000[
OM�/ I■ E30'! l% Y,' L': r[ m000m [000m[mm[m ■rrr[[rrr[[rrr[[000m
[ rrr[
m000[
[ rrr[
nnnnn
[ rrr[
[[ [!
[m [d
mmmlyl
1:IrJ[YI /10{
rENrY 0mrr[
mCl0a /1.1'r'I
L•!
91]L-mll 0'0000
mrrrW WOMEN
Y000[m000[m000100mmmmm0lr
nor,
mmm[a
nl9A
YrrOC
nrALLl1
7Y_L•C
I[m000[m000m[000m[00[[■ rrr[[rrr[[rrr[[rrr[m000m [000m [000m m0i�umriz:w\mm■ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[[ rrr[ NONE [[ rrr[[ rrr[[
Ilrrmmlrrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr Manion norrlrlgmm rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr lrrrrlrrrrlrrr000■
/'Y /iI1G
rrrrr ■aW.ill
Lrr/'
rrrrr rrrrr rrr 0r rrrrr
X0000000000 00000000 [ Em000[
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr lr llrV rrrriliLQ�J ■rrrrr rrrrr
01111101111011110111101111�Li111
m000[ m000m[ 000m[ m[ mmm000[m000[m000[m000[m0001
rrrr'_IIrF9r'
/000mee�0m
1011110■ 1111011110110011110111101111011110 ■11110111101111111101E,
[ m000[ m000m[ 000m[ 00[[ m000[ m000[ m000[ m000[ m000m[ 000m[ 000mmmmm[ mmmmrC\ 00m [000Z!N00EgIrlllOMENEM m000m[000M moomm[mmmm[['I10
aillfa%
I[ notion [000m[00[[m000[m000[m000[m000[ notion[ 000mm000[ m000 [mr�sm[000m[ri:a \irS.11..7ro notion[000m[000m[000m[[00[
[ m000[ m000m[ 000m [00[[m000[m000[m000[m000[notion oo.n!'!m [177�Lu i10a \00m [ 001 ■w @�fA ryra7n000n[000m[000m[000m[[00[
notion[ 000m[ mm[ mm000[
notion[ 000m[ mm[ mm000[
m000[ m000m[ 000n[ mouo00n00000m000
m000[ m000m[ 000m[ m[mmm000[m000[m000[n000uronr"on
[mmmm
"'ME3r:1
/'r0m
Il rrrr! rrrrr !rrrr 1001! rrrr! rrrr! rrrr! rrrr! rrrrr !rrrr lrrrlu ■rr.!.ai [•.!•:•Irro.O %al. ■r ra�xa.al %a rrrrr !rrrr !rrrr
I0■ rrrr[ rrr[ rrrr[ rrrrr[ rrrr[ rrrr[ rrrr[ rrrr[ rrr[ rrrr[ rrrr [[rrr0111101111101100011111111r C�� - \[ rrr[ rrrr[ rrrr[
!rrrr !rrrr
rrrr[ rrrr[
1100!
rrrrr[
rrrr! rrrrr !rrrr lrr lrrrrrlrrrrlrrrrr
111011111011110110111110
!rrrr lr orlonrrrrlrrrrlrrrrlrrrrr
[rrrr 111110111101011 ■ rrrr [rrrr [rrrr [rrrr
11111011110111E
!rrrr
!rrrr
I[■ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[00[[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000'-/ 10! 7[' Yl. lri .7000[[000[[000[[000[[OrrL:a \lm mmmmm■ 000[[
I[■ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[00[[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000 ■m000m[000m[00f�L' 100[ /IC[CC[000[[000m [000m m000[m000[d0:! \00m ■ 000[[
000[[
000[[
000[ [[00[[000[[000[[000[
000[[[00
MEN [[ MEN 0[[
■m000[m000m[000m[0m[m m000[molr8797[000m[m[0m
000[[ 000[[ 000[[[[0[[ 000 ■m000[m000[m000[m000m[000m[000m
m000 EE[��7mmla[ \000[m000m[000m[000m
I[■ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[00[[[ 000[[ 000 [[000[[000[[000[[000[[00[!000[[ \110[[ 000[[ 000[[000[[000[[000[[000[! \i:9 ■[ 000[[
Irrrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr lrrrlliFal'IC /Iil rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr lrmom��arr
000[[
rrrrr rrrrr
000[[[00[[
rrrrr
000[[ 000[[ 000[[0[[[[ 000
rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr rrr lr rrrrr
[f.l7II{illr.11�irJ'L[_0_0_0[rr r■r �.M^__�.%:n %0rnV .4.9
LrriY.■.•_� ^_ ^... ■r- - \I�-- ---- rl [�l
n000ommomm[000a
_
'^ ■rrrr
rrrrr
rrrrr
I0 ■1110111110111101100■ 0000 [0000[0000[1110111110111101111 W1110 arr1011111011110111111110 [ 0000[ 000[ 0000[ ri: lA'■\
I[ m000[ m000m [000m [00[[ m000[ m000[ m000[ m000[ nrn [000m [000m norm[ norm[ nrn [mmmm [0No m m000[ m000E nrn [000m [mmrc'0-
110111100110111101111101100lo
'
°vr 000000e�rr
.� ^ -_-
•��__ — ___� ^s
..o
.Orr.. ^ ^_ —
- ___�orr rF 7011110 [0000 ta�Ndu- n-
.WEN .� Mommomommoommom
: ►V71m011110NONE
I[■ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[00[[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[ [000m[000mi0�0�■!':-
I[■ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[00[[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[[ 000 [[000[[000[[000[[000[[000[m000m [000m [000m
[000m
���___
6'�im [[00[■
■ ^..i i��0�i000[o�� \ooi iiaa[[[[[[[[aa[[[7
000[[ 000[ [000[[00 \mm[m[mmm[m[m[mmmm[mil
[ 000[[ 000 [[000[[000[[ \�2_�!\!
[ 000[[ 000[[ 000[ mmmm[mmmm[1r-
\[000[[000n
'-,- �����•::
- -�

It
r -
R
R
O
J6
�6
Auburn Knightdale Road
NIF
MVER.RDME OF yio
5io'\\x � oGREENN � rc
UB 7022 #'
PIN ff41491804
N
PROP. RETAINING WALL � ! "
1� %
Lai
�t
1 m
;.

. T.
r
• `llb
I
ATKINS FISH TRAP
KM.ATIQ
�S ED -Fld
r A� REGISTEiR
"hk ELIGIBILITY
_ (SITE TOLE `OF -•
• CONSTUCTION LVv11TS)
WIP
VA CA
3g, • _
END
,� 1�,• � � 185-
. - J� .. + 16
. '�•' ' BEGIN BOARDWALK 1
182 +80.00 +
7 bD
�5 DO• PROPOSED KTL
APPROACH SLAB
EST NTONS CLASS •Appp�A H
' �G,r�.�� P• \ \ C�
'B'RIP RAP EST 20 FA&:rCFj g'
PROPOSED F /� / EXWIZ & LEVEL
w
-35* HOPE / G c SPREADER fNCDOT)
C, �N
F F
F F F
F
p \ - F r F BUSED DRAINAGE -
F F L Q?CH
a'°sPHAIL .
- SLOPE STAKES
F 1 FN F•
x
w oN Z
N ^ Q
/ LL �kozN w
3f me �
O Y LL W W a°0 LJ
aMV�i gam z
~ N
U Y
0
m
J
V
O >
/ f
ti 0
w
S •
,Yip
W
w
F F 20 `
—� C F
P1 STA178 +97.60
Pl STA180 +997/
Pl STA183 +3557 P1 STA /85 +3586
LU
LU
A = 68' 26' 530' f
= /208' 294' (LT) A = /3.02' 085' MT) A = 23' 5M 50l fRTI
Lf
F -
D = 5T l7' 448'
_ 14' 19'26Z
D = 14' 19'262' D = 14'19'26Z
-
L = //946'
L = 8476'
L = 9 /DP L = 166.60'
LU
�. T =6802
T = 4254'
T = 4570' T = 8453'
-
R = 400.W
- R = 40ODY
o
iiMrovv�1
rf +1000007
x
w oN Z
N ^ Q
/ LL �kozN w
3f me �
O Y LL W W a°0 LJ
aMV�i gam z
~ N
U Y
0
m
J
V
O >
/ f
ti 0
w
w
,Yip
W
w
F F 20 `
—� C F
QL
U
F
- F F
F �
LU
Ue)
LU
LU
F �
F
.� ►:
v
LU
w
Lf
F -
- - _
7
W
9
oc
�-
LU
U
f
North
o
Rogers
Lane
• Lgj a
LU
• W :6E
2A•!
w ul

`- '•
�SIYE *A Y
N TRU . P%p LIMIR
P EVE �JSL SUBJECT ft,- '
1
' ATA ��' CPV`ERY VAI
DU N N-1 FN DA vp' $ TION
dr._ '
�o
dye Y
r
.41 F
1 .
1
TI
'
1 ��y
w
0m g
o a
• r 62
Py
L' J'1 � i• LL
- rJ 1• i 1' 1 � 16r
.' •' 1. ar aM V�iCm Z
• , H
�a L U N
•.1 . Y
• 1 • U0
, ¢ J
V
s>
CRWREE CREEK .IL �v ■ L • M
�
t
777
N T- IP•.
-Y2-
T r-
Q 7
�
Q
Z
�L
R .
W
w
Tf I
U
LU7'
fn
W
♦
5
ro✓6 _ + ,
v'x�
w
co
z
9
ti
ce
w
U
0
�, •
'6 y
0 N r J
h� � w' . _ co
A
• Knightdale Bypass - . �' • I E f M hgj
w :s
. R BJ WVWERN p :a. EXI, 0 : W
ml WTn R rc r r % "5T ' "TlO �' in
5
a U)
P1 STA151 +70.44 P1 STA /53 +3/.85 P1 STA157 +8393 P1 STA158 +5292 P1 STA161 +27.32 P1 STA162 +08.44 Pl STA163+02.65 Pl STAl63 9
0 = 13' 35' 593' IRTJ A = 36.2f 567' ILTJ A = 6f 4841E ILTJ A = 23.4f 35.2' lRT1 A = 26.40' l0J' IRTJ A = 20' 05' 24.3' ILTJ p = 6f 30' 55.8' (LT) A _ 10.44' 33A' IRTJ
D = 14' 19'26Z D = 57.17' 44.8' D = 5T O' 44.8' D = 5T O' 44.8' D = 28' 38' 52.4' D = 28'3852.4' D = 57' l7' 44.8' D = 28' 38'52.,C
L = 9494' L = 63.47' L = 107.88' L = 4135' L = 93.09' L = 70JY L = 10736' L = 3750'
R = 400.W R 0O.00' R 0ODa R = /MW R = 200.00' R = 200.00' AR 59.5r .110' *R = to _

F
twig
oY 1
1
1
a,
....... ............................... ........................ ...............................
.................... .......................Rf�4C.,. .......................... ■..............................
......■....■ .......... .....................L7MOMMYJN6 i�J..■............MEN .............. ...............................
......■....■ .............................■....■....■..............■-...■.............. ■..............................
.■ oo■ oo■ o.o oo■ oo■ oor r___r r___r r___r r___r r___r �l��n n.��� _ rye. eoo oo. oo. oo. oo. oo. oo. oo. oo.
......................................................... L• li9L: I. L• IA. EJ Jr J............. ...............................
.........................................■ ...............GlC'7�711:,�I�Ii ilFl llllil.......... ■..............................
......................................................... rw.....* 7�rrl................ ■..............................
.■....■....■ .............................■....■....■....■ 1:i 1. E3__ rl., rl: MEN .............. ...............................
...................................................................................... ■..............................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::..................:::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
...................................................................................... ...............................
................. .........................rrr�nv crcnouoonouonoo.. o..........re.........................I
nnouonoouoonou. o..0000. Hluo_ L' J�rr .nouoonotionoouo..Tlraar.rrrz4 mil000u0000.
..................... .......... ........ .......■\..�� -........-------------- ........•.u.ru•.. a---- ......--- .......
....
.............. ..................00uoo_��.00na oa ° ............................. ...IL..........................
o ~ 1
RUGTIM9 r L•, ~
� 4" S 0. � •,
J
r ti y
e L ' r LL
END BRIDGE d• ~ 21
- sra is +oo.ao 4l -
rt a % �r CITY OF RNEKrYI f
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ACCESS #t
EXISTING ACCESS ROAD CONNECTS
_ LOCH RAVEN PARKWAY.
APPROXIMATE LENGTH = 1000 FT. Z
r p PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT -
` —% ` LOCH RAVEN PARKWAY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP LOCH RAVEN I
PARKWAY CLEAN, AND FREE FROM DEBRIS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ANY REPAIRS
TO DAMAGED PAVEMENT RESULTING FROM e
SET FENCE TTYP) USE. `
`y �1
0 1 AIM.
' L &
®R • :r6 • �• r�' r
ti q., H.
• *%6 r
4'
d 1
•v51 Ap-
IN
~+

1 1 `
I
4?
1
L. �1
- - rw 1
r; -
ew.
GL/°
RE
m
Fl
a ,
E DATA
P1 STA18+4752 P1 STA19 +52.64
= 68' 16' 07.8' (RT) 0 = 39' 50'07e (LT) • 1
D = 47' 44' 47-r D = 47' 44' 47.3' ' +
L = 142.98' L = 83.43' IT y
T = 81.35' T = 43.48' 1 a
R = 120.00' R = 120A0' 11 .
T
qplq
L
i
er
- - rw 1
r; -
ew.
GL/°
RE
m
Fl
a ,
E DATA
P1 STA18+4752 P1 STA19 +52.64
= 68' 16' 07.8' (RT) 0 = 39' 50'07e (LT) • 1
D = 47' 44' 47-r D = 47' 44' 47.3' ' +
L = 142.98' L = 83.43' IT y
T = 81.35' T = 43.48' 1 a
R = 120.00' R = 120A0' 11 .
t
�i
1
f
0
F�
1 C\
1 y.•
n\
er
fq
t
�i
1
f
0
F�
1 C\
1 y.•
n\

j�
L�

Q
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 2, 2011
Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Neuse River Trail, Crabtree Creek Segment, Wake County, ER 10 -2277
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Office of Archives and I listoiy
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Thank you for your letter of December 1, 2010, concerning the above cited project. We apologize for the
delay in our response.
Examination of our maps and files indicates that one of the proposed bridges may affect Atkins Fish Trap.
Your letter mentions that cultural resource investigations, among others, were conducted to aid in the
selection of the bridge locations. We request that you forward a copy of the cultural resource investigation
for our information. If the preliminary work done by Environmental Services, Inc. is the referenced
investigation, it consisted of a literature search as no archaeological field survey was involved. Information in
their report was taken primarily from our maps and files. You should note that archaeological sites
31WA1359 and 31WA1360 identified on your map as eligible for the National Register have been subjected
to data recovery excavations as they were adversely affected by the construction of the Knightdale Bypass by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
There are areas of the Crabtree Creek Segment that may contain archaeological resources. It would be helpful
if you could forward information as to the regulatory requirements for the trail. Will permits be required
from the US Army Corps of Engineers? If so, what is the defined permit area and the area of potential effect
(APE)? If the project requires federal permits and is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we may recommend archaeological survey of portions of the project.
We would appreciate receiving a copy of the cultural resource investigation report as well as detailed mapping,
if available, of the trail in the vicinity of Atkins Fish Trap so we may determine if it will be affected and what
mitigation measures may be appropriate.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
Location: 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 iviad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: [phone]-
6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
C1�d kd uLL (t
,/Claudia Brown

�jjr � •.,J'a
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
March 7, 2011
Michael Taylor
Stewart Engineering, Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Office of Archives and Ilistory
Division of I Iistorical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Neuse River Trail, Wake County, ER 09 -0167, ER 10 -0989, ER 10 -1353, ER 10 -1783, ER 10 -2259, ER
10 -2276 and ER 10 -2277
Dear Mr. Taylor:
Thank you for your letter of February 16, 2011, concerning the above projects. We appreciate your meeting
with staff of the Office of State Archaeology to clarify project plans. We have reviewed the accompanying
maps, plans and aerial photographs and offer the following comments.
While the fish trap portions of archaeological site 31WA214 ** will not be affected by the proposed greenway,
the possible mill and dam portions of the site may be affected. We recommend that the area of the greenway
in the vicinity of 31WA214 ** be surveyed by an experienced professional archaeologist. If portions of the site
will be affected, it should be evaluated for its eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
The Mial Plantation Trailhead should be surveyed by an experienced professional archaeologist, as there is a
high probability for the presence of archaeological resources. Monitoring by an experienced professional
archaeologist should be undertaken in the vicinity of archaeological site 31 WA27 to ensure that no significant
archaeological resources are affected by the project.
The east side of the river in the area of archaeological site 31WA1617 should be surveyed by an experienced
professional archaeologist. If portions of the site will be affected, it should be evaluated for its eligibility for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
Based on examination of the project plans, maps and aerial photographs, we concur with your assessment that
archaeological sites 31 WA519, 31 WA1625, 31 WA663 ** and the Atkins Fish Trap are outside the area of
impact or have been destroyed by past activities. We withdraw our earlier recommendations for archaeological
investigations in these areas.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site forms,
should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are submitted by the consulting
archaeologist and well in advance of any construction activities.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at http: / /www. archaeology. ncdcr. gov /ncarch /resource /consultants.htm. The
archaeologists listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended
survey.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
60KCIaudia Brown

I
STEWART
Project:
Job Number:
Description:
Lower Neuse Greenway
H9001.00
Hydraulic Design Criteria
By: JH Date: 10/6/2008
Checked: DB Date: 10/6/2008
Duration
Return Period
2 yr.
(in /hr)
5 yr.
(in /hr)
10 yr.
(in /hr)
25 yr.
(in / hr)
50 yr.
(in /hr)
7(ion 0 yr.
/hr)
5 min.
5.76
6.58
7.22
8.19
8.96
9.72
10 min.
4.76
5.54
6.13
7.01
7.71
8.40
15 min.
4.04
4.74
5.25
6.03
6.64
7.24
30 min.
2.70
3.28
3.71
4.32
4.80
5.28
60 min.
1.70
2.12
2.41
2.84
3.17
3.50
120 min.
0.95
1.20
1.37
1.62
1.81
2.00
180 min.
0.71
0.89
1.02
1.21
1.35
1.50
360 min.
0.44
0.56
0.65
0.77
0.86
0.96
720 min.
0.26
0.33
0.39
0.46
0.52
0.57
1440 min.
0.15
0.19
0.22
0.27
0.30
0.33
5 min
5.76
6.58
7.22
8.19
8.96
9.72
TT
min
6.76
7.62
8.31
9.37
10.21
11.04
10 min
4.76
5.54
6.13
7.01
7.71
8.40
TT
min
6.20
7.14
7.89
8.97
9.85
10.72
15 min
4.04
4.74
5.25
6.03
6.64
7.24
TT
min
5.38
6.20
6.79
7.74
8.48
9.20
30 min
2.70
3.28
3.71
4.32
4.80
5.28
TT
min
3.70
4.44
5.01
5.80
6.43
7.06
60 min
1.70
2.12
2.41
2.84
3.17
3.50
TT
min
2.45
3.04
3.45
4.06
4.53
5.00
120 min
0.95
1.20
1.37
1.62
1.81
2.00
TT
min
1.43
1.82
2.07
2.44
2.73
3.00
180 min
0.71
0.89
1.02
1.21
1.35
1.50
TT
min
0.98
1.22
1.39
1.65
1.84
2.04
360 min
0.44
0.56
0.65
0.77
0.86
0.96
TT
min
0.62
0.79
0.91
1.08
1.20
1.35
720 min
0.26
0.33
0.39
0.46
0.52
0.57
TT
min
0.37
0.47
0.56
0.65
0.74
0.81
1440 min
0.15
0.19
0.22
0.27
0.30
0.33

wo
PROPOSED gREEN1WAY TRAIL
CULVERT
1.66 AC
Tc PATH
DELINEATION
ZZ
/ '

oy: �I
STEWART Checked: BC
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 1
Location: -Y2- 30 +00
Date: 2/21/2012
Date: 2/21/2012
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
C
1
1.661
0.028
0.900
1 1.633
0.500
0.507
0.842
Totals
1.661
2.67
0.842
ime of Concentration Calculation is less than 5 min. Use Rational Method with 5 min Intensity's.
Q10 =CIA= 6.08 cfs
Q25 =CIA= 6.89 cfs
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft /ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Sheet Flow:
75
236
188
0.6400
0.24
2.67
Shallow Conc. Flow:
148
188
175
0.0878
Unpaved
0.52
Open Channel Flow:
100
180
175
0.0500
0.08
0.86
Time
of Concentration =
4.04
ime of Concentration Calculation is less than 5 min. Use Rational Method with 5 min Intensity's.
Q10 =CIA= 6.08 cfs
Q25 =CIA= 6.89 cfs

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
01 - Culvert 1 - Sta.30 +00 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 6.08 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 6.08 cfs Check Discharge 6.89 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 176.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -18 inch Circular 6.08 cfs 177.77 ft 5.14 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior%00 cfs 177.77 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 6.08 cfs 177.77 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v32 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:39:58 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
01 - Culvert 1 - Sta.30 +00 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
177.77 ft
177.67 ft
177.77 ft
1.04
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
6.08 cfs
176.50 ft
Outlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
176.20 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
176.00 ft
0.006250 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
M2
Mild
Subcritical
5.14 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.95 ft
0.95 ft
0.95 ft
0.006264 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
177.77 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.41 ft
0.20 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 177.67 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
1.8 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:39:58 A1\18entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
01 - Culvert 1 - Sta.30 +00 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
177.77 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
179.52 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 179.52
100.00 179.52
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:39:58 ArRentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
01 - Culvert 1 - Sta.30 +00 -Y2-
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:08 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert -1
1 -18 inch Circular 13.49 cfs
179.52 ft
7.98 fUs
Weir
Roadway (Constant ElevatiorGTj 00 cfs
179.52 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 13.49 cfs
179.52 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:08 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
01 - Culvert 1 - Sta.30 +00 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev<
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
179.52 ft
179.52 ft
179.33 ft
2.21
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
13.49 cfs
176.50 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
176.20 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
176.00 ft
0.006250 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile
Slope Type Mild
Flow Regime Subcritical
Velocity Downstream 7.98 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.37 ft
N/A ft
1.37 ft
0.014394 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
179.33 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.91 ft
0.45 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 179.52 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
1.8 ftz
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:08 A1\11entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
01 - Culvert 1 - Sta.30 +00 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
179.52 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
179.52 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 179.52
100.00 179.52
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:08 A1\5entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

C\j
Zt U-1
LQ i
Q Q) Z)
Q
LLJ
V)
O
loll
S 0
\ -76
dol;
�
CL
Zt
"o,
LLJ
Zt
00,
U-i
\ -76
dol;

By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
STEWART
Pervious Area
Project:
Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number:
H9001.00
Description:
Crabtree Creek - Culvert 2
Location:
-Y2- 35 +80
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
C
1
1.676
0.012
0.900
1.664
1 0.500
0.503
0.843
Totals
1.676
20.88
0.843
A = 1.676 acres C = 0.5029 T = 20.878704 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Intensity, I in. /hr.)
3.51
4.17
4.65
5.36
5.92
Sheet Flow:
300
218
200
0.0600
0.24
20.88
Shallow Conc. Flow:
235
200
181
0.0809
Unpaved
0.85
Open Channel Flow:
125
181
179
0.0160
0.08
1.58
Time of Concentration =
23.31
A = 1.676 acres C = 0.5029 T = 20.878704 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I in. /hr.)
3.51
4.17
4.65
5.36
5.92
6.47
Discharge, Q (cfs)
2.96
3.51
3.92
4.52
4.99
5.45

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
02 - Culvert 2 - Sta.35 +80 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 3.92 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 3.92 cfs Check Discharge 4.52 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 178.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -18 inch Circular 3.92 cfs 179.40 ft 4.38 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevation 00 cfs 179.40 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 3.92 cfs 179.40 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:20 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
02 - Culvert 2 - Sta.35 +80 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
179.40 ft
179.30 ft
179.40 ft
0.80
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
3.92 cfs
178.50 ft
Outlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
178.20 ft
40.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
178.00 ft
0.005000 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
M2
Mild
Subcritical
4.38 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.76 ft
0.77 ft
0.76 ft
0.005388 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
179.40 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.28 ft
0.14 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 17930 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
1.8 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:20 AlBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
02 - Culvert 2 - Sta.35 +80 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
179.40 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
180.99 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 180.99
100.00 180.99
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:20 Ar8entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
02 - Culvert 2 - Sta.35 +80 -Y2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1 -18 inch Circular 11.85 cfs 180.99 ft 7.25 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatiorg00 cfs 180.99 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 11.85 cfs 180.99 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster 0.2 (03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:28 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
02 - Culvert 2 - Sta.35 +80 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
180.99 ft
180.99 ft
180.97 ft
1.86
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
11.85 cfs
178.50 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
178.20 ft
40.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
178.00 ft
0.005000 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile Composite M2 PressureProfile
Slope Type Mild
Flow Regime Subcritical
Velocity Downstream 7.25 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.31 ft
N/A ft
1.31 ft
0.011571 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
180.97 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.70 ft
0.35 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 180.99 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
1.8 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:28 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
02 - Culvert 2 - Sta.35 +80 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
180.99 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
180.99 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 180.99
100.00 180.99
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:28 A1\11entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

I
I
/
t
I
1
i
20.646 AC
r ,
i 1
DELINEATION
� ( , ,�� Tc PATH
PROPOS D GREENWAY,
TRAIL
RT 3 -
�p

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 3
Location: -Y2- 67 +35
Drainage Area:
Time of Concentration:
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Sub -Area 1
Acres
C
Acres
C
5.39
1
20.646
0.092
0.900
20.554
0.500
0.502
10.360
Shallow Conc. Flow:
833
Totals
20.646
0.0348
10.360
4.61
Time of Concentration:
Discharge:
A = 20.646 acres C = 0.5018 T = 10.93462 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
4.63
5.39
5.97
Sheet Flow:
175
226
208
0.1029
0.24
10.93
Shallow Conc. Flow:
833
208
179
0.0348
Unpaved
4.61
Open Channel Flow:
236
179
174
0.0212
0.08
2.31
Time
of Concentration =
17.86
Discharge:
A = 20.646 acres C = 0.5018 T = 10.93462 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
4.63
5.39
5.97
6.83
7.51
8.18
Discharge, Q (cfs)
47.92
55.84
61.80
70.72
77.80
84.78

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
03 - Culvert 3 - Sta.67 +35 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 61.80 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 61.80 cfs Check Discharge 70.72 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 176.20 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 2 -36 inch Circular 61.81 cfs 177.83 ft 7.50 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatiorg00 cfs 177.83 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 61.81 cfs 177.83 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:37 ArBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
03 - Culvert 3 - Sta.67 +35 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
177.83 ft
177.64 ft
177.83 ft
0.98
Discharge 61.81 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 176.20 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
174.90 ft
40.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
174.70 ft
0.005000 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 7.50 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.70 ft
1.68 ft
1.80 ft
0.004038 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SecQurr bIHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 36 inch
Number Sections 2
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
3.00 ft
3.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
177.83 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.75 ft
0.38 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 177.64 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
14.1 ftz
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:40:37 A1\11entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
03 - Culvert 3 - Sta.67 +35 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
177.83 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
178.85 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 178.85
100.00 178.85
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:37 2Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
03 - Culvert 3 - Sta.67 +35 -Y2-
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:44 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert -1
2 -36 inch Circular 98.49 cfs
178.85 ft
8.53 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatior6lj 00 cfs
178.85 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 98.51 cfs
178.85 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:44 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
03 - Culvert 3 - Sta.67 +35 -Y2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
178.85 ft
178.83 ft
178.85 ft
1.32
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
98.49 cfs
176.20 ft
Outlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
174.90 ft
40.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
174.70 ft
0.005000 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
M2
Mild
Subcritical
8.53 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
2.28 ft
2.37 ft
2.28 ft
0.005395 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SecQoTr dlHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 36 inch
Number Sections 2
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
3.00 ft
3.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
178.85 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
1.06 ft
0.53 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 178.83 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
14.1 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:44 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
03 - Culvert 3 - Sta.67 +35 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
178.85 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
178.85 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 178.85
100.00 178.85
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40 44 Algentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

♦
♦
o �
� 1
1
i
►
9.980 AC
i 1
, o
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I `
1
1
►
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
i
1
1
CULVERT 4 1'
/
i
1
I
I
♦
♦
o �
� 1
1
i
►
9.980 AC
i 1
, o
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I `
1
1
►
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
i
1
1
CULVERT 4 1'

S
STEWART
Project:
Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number:
H9001.00
Description:
Crabtree Creek - Culvert 4
Location:
- Y2 -79 +20
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
1
Acres
C
1
9.980
0.023
0.900
9.957
0.500
0.501
4.999
Totals
9.980
21.89
4.999
A = 9.980 acres C = 0.5009 T = 28.483376 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev.
Elev.
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Intensity, I in. /hr.)
2.84
3.43 J
3.87
4.49
4.99
Sheet Flow:
300
237
221
0.0533
0.24
21.89
Shallow Conc. Flow:
1187
221
180
0.0345
Unpaved
6.60
Open Channel Flow:
70
180
177
0.0429
0.08
0.69
Time of Concentration =
28.48
A = 9.980 acres C = 0.5009 T = 28.483376 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
1 10
25
50
100
Intensity, I in. /hr.)
2.84
3.43 J
3.87
4.49
4.99
5.48
Discharge, Q (cfs)
14.18
17.14
1 19.33
22.46
24.93
27.39

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
04 - Culvert 4 - Sta.79 +20 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 19.33 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 19.33 cfs Check Discharge 22.46 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 179.00 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2 -24 inch Circular 19.33 cfs 179.30 ft 3.08 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatiot 00 cfs 179.30 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 19.33 cfs 179.30 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:54 At8entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
04 - Culvert 4 - Sta.79 +20 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
179.30 ft
179.00 ft
179.30 ft
1.05
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
19.33 cfs
179.00 ft
Outlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
177.20 ft
48.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
177.00 ft
0.004167 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
M1
Mild
Subcritical
3.08 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
2.00 ft
1.19 ft
1.11 ft
0.005143 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
24 inch
2
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
179.30 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.16 ft
0.08 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 179.00 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
6.3 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:40:54 AlBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
04 - Culvert 4 - Sta.79 +20 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
179.30 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
180.21 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 180.21
100.00 180.21
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:40:54 41\16entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
04 - Culvert 4 - Sta.79 +20 -Y2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2 -24 inch Circular 38.30 cfs 180.21 ft 6.10 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior6Jj00 cfs 180.21 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 38.30 cfs 180.21 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:41:01 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
04 - Culvert 4 - Sta.79 +20 -Y2-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
180.21 ft
Discharge
38.30 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev.
180.01 ft
Tailwater Elevation
179.00 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev.
180.21 ft
Control Type
Outlet Control
Headwater Depth /Height
1.51
Grades
Upstream Invert
177.20 ft
Downstream Invert
177.00 ft
Length
48.00 ft
Constructed Slope
0.004167 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile PressureProfile
Depth, Downstream
2.00 ft
Slope Type
N/A
Normal Depth
N/A ft
Flow Regime
N/A
Critical Depth
1.57 ft
Velocity Downstream
6.10 ft/s
Critical Slope
0.007750 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Circular
Mannings Coefficient
0.013
Section Material
Concrete
Span
2.00 ft
Section Size
24 inch
Rise
2.00 ft
Number Sections
2
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
180.21 ft
Upstream Velocity Head
0.58 ft
Ke
0.50
Entrance Loss
0.29 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev.
180.01 ft
Flow Control
Submerged
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
Area Full
6.3 ft2
K
0.00980
HDS 5 Chart
1
M
2.00000
HDS 5 Scale
1
C
0.03980
Equation Form
1
Y
0.67000
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:41:01 A(Sentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
04 - Culvert 4 - Sta.79 +20 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
180.21 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
180.21 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 180.21
100.00 180.21
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:01 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

7
Af
l {
I � l
Tc PATH
(NEAT ION
t
Tc PATH 16.567 AC
_,. CULVERT
9.980 AC 40
000,
oll,
_VERY
/
4
PROPOSED GREENWAY'
TRAIL

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 5
Location: -Y2- 89 +30
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
116.514
C
1
16.567
0.053
0.900
Sheet Flow:
0.500
0.501
8.305
Totals
16.567
20.88
8.305
A = 16.567 acres C = 0.5013 T = 25.639794 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
3.09
3.70
4.16
4.82
5.33
Sheet Flow:
300
237
219
0.0600
0.24
20.88
Shallow Conc. Flow:
955
219
178
0.0429
Unpaved
4.76
Open Channel Flow:
330
178
172
0.0182
0.08
3.17
Time of Concentration =
25.64
A = 16.567 acres C = 0.5013 T = 25.639794 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
3.09
3.70
4.16
4.82
5.33
5.85
Discharge, Q (cfs)
25.66
30.76
34.53
40.00
44.30
48.58

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
05 - Culvert 5 - Sta.89 +30 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 34.53 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 34.53 cfs Check Discharge 40.00 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 173.00 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -42 inch Circular 34.54 cfs 175.71 ft 10.65 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant ElevatiorCkOO cfs 175.71 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 34.54 cfs 175.71 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01
02/22/12 10:59:39 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
05 - Culvert 5 - Sta.89 +30 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
175.71 ft
175.44 ft
175.71 ft
0.83
Discharge 34.54 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 173.00 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.80 ft
48.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
171.80 ft
0.020833 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 10.65 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.30 ft
1.16 ft
1.82 ft
0.004119 ft/ft
S ecti on
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
42 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
3.50 ft
3.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
175.71 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.72 ft
0.36 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 175.44 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
9.6 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 10:59:39 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
05 - Culvert 5 - Sta.89 +30 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
175.71 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
182.21 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 182.21
100.00 182.21
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 10:59:39 ArNBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
05 - Culvert 5 - Sta.89 +30 -Y2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -42 inch Circular 128.52 cfs 182.21 ft 15.22 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatiorfi%.00 cfs 182.21 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 128.52 cfs 182.21 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 10:59:47 AI\Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
05 - Culvert 5 - Sta.89 +30 -Y2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
182.21 ft
Discharge 128.52 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev.
182.21 ft
Tailwater Elevation 173.00 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev.
180.45 ft
Control Type Inlet Control
Headwater Depth /Height
2.69
Critical Depth 3.30 ft
Grades
Upstream Invert 172.80 ft Downstream Invert 171.80 ft
Length 48.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.020833 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 180.45 ft Upstream Velocity Head 2.90 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 1.45 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 182.21 ft Flow Control Submerged
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall Area Full 9.6 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22112 10:59:47 AI\Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
S2
Depth, Downstream 2.87 ft
Slope Type
Steep
Normal Depth 2.56 ft
Flow Regime
Supercritical
Critical Depth 3.30 ft
Velocity Downstream
15.22 ft/s
Critical Slope 0.014108 ft /ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 180.45 ft Upstream Velocity Head 2.90 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 1.45 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 182.21 ft Flow Control Submerged
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall Area Full 9.6 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22112 10:59:47 AI\Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
05 - Culvert 5 - Sta.89 +30 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
EIev. (ft)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
182.21 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
182.21 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft)
EIev. (ft)
0.00
182.21
100.00
182.21
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t:\... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01
02/22/12 10:59:47 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

C\j
C:)
41y

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
STEWART
Project:
Job Number:
Description:
Location:
Lower Neuse Greenway
H9001.00
Crabtree Creek - Culvert 6
-Y2- 96 +90
By:
Checked:
CC
BC
Date:
Date:
2/21/2012
2/21/2012
Drainage Area;
0.172
0.016
0.900
0.156
0.500
0.537
0.092
Totals
0.172
0.092
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Discharge: Rational Method
Q10 =CIA=
Q25 =CIA=
0.67 cfs
0.76 cfs
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
C
1
0.172
0.016
0.900
0.156
0.500
0.537
0.092
Totals
0.172
0.092

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
06 - Culvert6 - Sta 96 +90 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 0.67 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 0.67 cfs Check Discharge 0.76 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 178.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1 -18 inch Circular 0.67 cfs 181.16 ft 1.30 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant ElevatiorfiTj 00 cfs 181.16 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 0.67 cfs 181.16 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:27 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
06 - Culvert6 - Sta 96 +90 -Y2-
Component:Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev<
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
181.16 ft
181.05 ft
181.16 ft
0.31
Discharge 0.67 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 178.50 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
180.70 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
178.00 ft
0.084375 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeS1S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime N/A
Velocity Downstream 1.30 fUs
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.50 ft
0.15 ft
0.30 ft
0.005046 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
181.16 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.11 ft
0.05 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 181.05 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
1.8 ft'
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01
02/22/12 08:41:27 Ardentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
06 - Culvert6 - Sta 96 +90 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
181.16 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
182.10 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 182.10
100.00 182.10
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:27 AIgentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
06 - Culvert6 - Sta 96 +90 -Y2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1
1 -18 inch Circular 5.06 cfs
182.10 ft
11.75 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatiorg00 cfs
182.10 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 5.06 cfs
182.10 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:37 Algentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
06 - Culvert6 - Sta 96 +90 -Y2-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
182.10 ft
181.94 ft
182.10 ft
0.93
Discharge 5.06 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 178.50 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
180.70 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
178.00 ft
0.084375 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 11.75 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.44 ft
0.41 ft
0.87 ft
0.005802 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
182.10 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.36 ft
0.18 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 181.94 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
1.8 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:41:37 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
06 - Culvert6 - Sta 96 +90 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
182.10 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
182.10 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 182.10
100.00 182.10
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:41:37 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

i
PROPOSED
TRAIL
Tc PATH
DELINEATION \ /
I �
I 5.073 AC' I
i
I
1
,
GREENWAY
/11J ffv V CULVERT 7
/
1
r �
� 1
I .
i'

By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 7
Location: -Y2- 102 +90
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
C
1
5.070
0.034
0.900
5.036
0.500
0.503
2.549
Totals
5.070
23.09
2.549
A = 5.070 acres C = 0.5027 T = 28.018699 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev.
Elev.
Slope
s (ft /ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
2.88
3.47
3.91
4.55
5.04
Sheet Flow:
300
215
201
0.0467
0.24
23.09
Shallow Conc. Flow:
840
201
175
0.0310
Unpaved
4.93
Open Channel Flow:
150
175
173
0.0133
0.08
1.95
Time of Concentration =
28.02
A = 5.070 acres C = 0.5027 T = 28.018699 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
1 25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
2.88
3.47
3.91
4.55
5.04
5.54
Discharge, Q (cfs)
7.33
8.85
9.97
1 11.59
12.85
14.12

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
07 - Culvert 7 - Sta.102 +90 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 9.97 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 9.97 cfs Check Discharge 11.59 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 173.00 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1 -24 inch Circular 9.97 cfs 174.82 ft 7.42 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior51j00 cfs 174.82 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 9.97 cfs 174.82 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:41:45 A(NBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
07 - Culvert 7 - Sta.102 +90 -Y2-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
174.82 ft
174.68 ft
174.82 ft
0.91
Discharge 9.97 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 173.00 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
173.00 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
172.50 ft
0.013889 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 7.42 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.89 ft
0.85 ft
1.13 ft
0.005198 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
24 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
174.82 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.46 ft
0.23 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 174.68 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
3.1 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:45 AlBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
07 - Culvert 7 - Sta.102 +90 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
174.82 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
177.20 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 177.20
100.00 177.20
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:45 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
07 - Culvert 7 - Sta.102 +90 -Y2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -24 inch Circular 26.69 cfs 177.20 ft 9.51 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior(JA00 cfs 177.20 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 26.70 cfs 177.20 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:41:51 Atflentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
07 - Culvert 7 - Sta.102 +90 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
177.20 ft
177.20 ft
176.67 ft
2.10
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
26.69 cfs
173.00 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
173.00 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
172.50 ft
0.013889 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 9.51 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.67 ft
1.64 ft
1.80 ft
0.012247 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
24 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
176.67 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
1.25 ft
0.62 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 177.20 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
3.1 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:41:51 AIBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
07 - Culvert 7 - Sta.102 +90 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
177.20 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
177.20 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 177.20
100.00 177.20
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:41:51 QAMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

5 /
00,
��� 's
tN
000l
'000,
clo-
(i (!Z) I \ \ \
\c
loo

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 8
Location: -Y2- 125 +00
Drainage Area:
Discharge: Rational Method
Q10 =CIA= 0.61 cfs
Q25 =CIA= 0.69 cfs
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
I Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
C
1
0.160
0.011
0.900
1 0.149
0.500
0.528
0.084
Totals
0.160
0.084
Discharge: Rational Method
Q10 =CIA= 0.61 cfs
Q25 =CIA= 0.69 cfs

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
08 - Culvert 8 - Sta.125 +00 -Y2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 0.61 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 0.61 cfs Check Discharge 0.69 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 173.40 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -18 inch Circular 0.61 cfs 175.94 ft 1.18 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior%00 cfs 175.94 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 0.61 cfs 175.94 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:00 A1\11entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
08 - Culvert 8 - Sta.125 +00 -Y2-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elevt
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
175.94 ft
175.83 ft
175.94 ft
0.29
Discharge 0.61 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 173.40 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
175.50 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
172.90 ft
0.081250 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeS1S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime N/A
Velocity Downstream 1.18 ft /s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.50 ft
0.15 ft
0.29 ft
0.005070 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
175.94 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.10 ft
0.05 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 175.83 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
1.8 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:42:00 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
08 - Culvert 8 - Sta.125 +00 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
EIev. (ft)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
175.94 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
177.14 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft)
EIev. (ft)
0.00
177.14
100.00
177.14
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01j
02/22/12 08:42:00 AIflentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
08 - Culvert 8 - Sta.125 +00 -Y2-
is aartopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev, Velocity
Culvert -1
1 -18 inch Circular 6.53 cfs
177.14 ft
12.13 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatiorfilj 00 cfs
177.14 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 6.53 cfs
177.14 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:42:08 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
08 - Culvert 8 - Sta.125 +00 -Y2-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew 177.14 ft
Inlet Control HW Elev. 177.00 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 177.14 ft
Headwater Depth /Height 1.09
Discharge 6.53 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 173.40 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
175.50 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
172.90 ft
0.081250 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
S2
Steep
Supercritical
12.13 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.52 ft
0.48 ft
0.99 ft
0.006500 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
18 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
1.50 ft
1.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
177.14 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.43 ft
0.22 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 177.00 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
1.8 ft'
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:42:08 Afflentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
08 - Culvert 8 - Sta.125 +00 -Y2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
177.14 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
177.14 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 177.14
100.00 177.14
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:08 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

OF,
Q
LLJ
C)
CL
LQ
cr--
CO
cr-
O
cr- j
Z�)
(i -
m
(3) -cl
Cr-
LQ
Yll
t"J/
C\j
------ LO
L6
cl-
oo,
--1 ----- -------- -------
---
-------- -----
Lli >--
C)
----------
O
cr- j
Z�)
(i -
m
(3) -cl
Cr-
LQ
Yll
t"J/
C\j
------ LO
L6
cl-
oo,

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21 /2012
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 9
Location: - Y2Revl- 136 +50
Drainage Area:
Time of Concentration:
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
CW
CA
Sub -Area 1
Acres
C
1
Acres
C
4.29
1
4.025
0.023
0.900
4.002
0.500
0.502
2.022
Shallow Conc. Flow:
880
Totals
4.025
0.0284
2.022
5.39
Time of Concentration:
Discharge:
A = 4.025 acres C =0.5023 T = 19.614373 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
1 100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
3.63
4.29
4.78
Sheet Flow:
205
216
201
0.0732
0.24
14.22
Shallow Conc. Flow:
880
201
176
0.0284
Unpaved
5.39
Open Channel Flow:
190
176
169
0.0368
0.08
1.58
Time
of Concentration =
19.61
Discharge:
A = 4.025 acres C =0.5023 T = 19.614373 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
1 5
1 10
25
1 50
1 100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
3.63
4.29
4.78
5.50
6.07
6.64
Discharge, Q (cfs)
7.33
8.67
9.66
11.13
12.28
13.42

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
09 - Culvert 9 - Sta.136 +50 - Y2Rev1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 9.66 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 9.66 cfs Check Discharge 11.13 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 168.40 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -24 inch Circular 9.66 cfs 171.79 ft 11.79 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior%00 cfs 171.79 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 9.66 cfs 171.79 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:17 A1\11entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
09 - Culvert 9 - Sta.136 +50 - Y2Rev1-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
171.79 ft
171.59 ft
171.79 ft
0.89
Discharge 9.66 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 168.40 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
170.00 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
167.90 ft
0.065625 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 11.79 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.61 ft
0.55 ft
1.11 ft
0.005145 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
24 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
171.79 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.45 ft
0.23 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 171.59 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
3.1 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:17 AI'dentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
09 - Culvert 9 - Sta.136 +50 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
171.79 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
174.96 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 174.96
100.00 174.96
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:17 WBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
09 - Culvert 9 - Sta.136 +50 - Y2Rev1-
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:42:24 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert-1
1 -24 inch Circular 30.23 cfs
174.96 ft
14.79 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatiorg00 cfs
174.96 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 30.23 cfs
174.96 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:42:24 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
09 - Culvert 9 - Sta.136 +50 - Y2Rev1-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew 174.96 ft
Inlet Control HW Elev. 174.96 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 174.15 ft
Headwater Depth /Height 2.48
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
30.23 cfs
168.40 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
170.00 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
167.90 ft
0.065625 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
S2
Steep
Supercritical
14.79 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.24 ft
1.03 ft
1.87 ft
0.015442 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
24 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
174.15 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
1.53 ft
0.76 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 174.96 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
3.1 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:24 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
09 - Culvert 9 - Sta.136 +50 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
174.96 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
174.96 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 174.96
100.00 174.96
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:24 ArBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 10
Location: - Y2Revl- 137 +65
Drainage Area:
Time of Concentration:
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Sub -Area 1
Acres
C
Acres
C
4.97
1
5.520
0.031
1 0.900
5.489
0.500
0.502
2.772
Shallow Conc. Flow:
745
Totals
5.520
0.0389
2.772
3.90
Time of Concentration:
Discharge:
A = 5.520 acres C = 0.5022 T = 13.57189 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev.
Elev.
Slope
s (ft /ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
4.25
4.97
5.50
Sheet Flow:
155
221
204
0.1097
0.24
9.67
Shallow Conc. Flow:
745
204
175
0.0389
Unpaved
3.90
Open Channel Flow:
50
175
170
01000
0.08
0.38
Time of Concentration =
13.57
Discharge:
A = 5.520 acres C = 0.5022 T = 13.57189 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
4.25
4.97
5.50
6.31
6.95
7.57
Discharge, Q (cfs)
11.77
13.77
15.25
17.49
19.26
20.99

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
10 - Culvert 10 - Sta.137 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 15.25 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 15.25 cfs Check Discharge 17.49 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 171.00 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -30 inch Circular 15.26 cfs 174.11 ft 12.12 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior%00 cfs 174.11 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 15.26 cfs 174.11 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:42:32 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
10 - Culvert 10 - Sta.137 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev<
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
174.11 ft
173.87 ft
174.11 ft
0.84
Discharge 15.26 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 171.00 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.00 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
170.00 ft
0.055556 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 12.12 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.76 ft
0.67 ft
1.32 ft
0.004637 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
30 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.50 ft
2.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
174.11 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.53 ft
0.26 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 173.87 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
4.9 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:32 Algentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
10 - Culvert 10 - Sta.137 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
174.11 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
175.16 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 175.16
100.00 175.16
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:32 2R1\11entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
10 - Culvert 10 - Sta.137 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:40 WBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert -1
1 -30 inch Circular 29.14 cfs
175.16 ft
13.64 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatiorq 00 cfs
175.16 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 29.15 cfs
175.16 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:40 WBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
10 - Culvert 10 - Sta.137 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew 175.16 ft
Inlet Control HW Elev. 175.02 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 175.16 ft
Headwater Depth /Height 1.26
Discharge 29.14 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 171.00 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.00 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
170.00 ft
0.055556 ft /ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
S2
Steep
Supercritical
13.64 fUs
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.12 ft
0.94 It
1.84 ft
0.006343 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections
Circular
Concrete
30 inch
1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.013
2.50 ft
2.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
175.16 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.88 ft
0.44 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 175.02 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Transition
4.9 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:40 AI\Sentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
10 - Culvert 10 - Sta.137 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
175.16 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
175.16 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) Elev. (ft)
0.00 175.16
100.00 175.16
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01 j
02/22/12 08:42:40 At\Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 11
Location: - Y2Rev1- 147 +40
Drainage Area:
Time of Concentration:
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Sub -Area 1
Acres
C
Acres
C
5.10
1
7.180
0.017
0.900
7.163
0.500
0.501
3.597
Shallow Conc. Flow:
660
Totals
7.180
0.0379
3.597
3.50
Time of Concentration:
Discharge:
A = 7.180 acres C =0.5009 T = 12.740538 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft /ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
4.37
5.10
5.65
Sheet Flow:
165
223
200
0.1394
0.24
9.24
Shallow Conc. Flow:
660
200
175
0.0379
Unpaved
3.50
Open Channel Flow:
180
175
170
0.0278
0.08
1.69
Time
of Concentration =
12.74
Discharge:
A = 7.180 acres C =0.5009 T = 12.740538 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
4.37
5.10
5.65
6.47
7.12
7.76
Discharge, Q (cfs)
15.70
18.35
2031
23.28
25.62
27.93

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
11 - Culvert 11 - Sta.147 +40 - Y2Rev1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 20.31 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 20.31 cfs Check Discharge 23.28 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 170.00 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -30 inch Circular 20.32 cfs 173.11 ft 11.38 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant ElevatiorgOO cfs 173.11 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 20.32 cfs 173.11 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:48 Ardentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
11 - Culvert 11 - Sta.147 +40 - Y2Rev1-
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
173.11 ft
172.98 ft
173.11 ft
0.92
Discharge 20.32 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 170.00 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
170.80 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
169.50 ft
0.036111 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 11.38 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.98 ft
0.83 ft
1.53 ft
0.004355 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
Sec0mrM d1 -IDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 30 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
2.50 ft
2.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
173.11 ft
0.20
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.65 ft
0.13 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 172.98 ft
Inlet Type Beveled ring, 33.7° bevels
K 0.00180
M 2.50000
C 0.02430
Y 0.83000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
4.9 ft2
3
B
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:42:48 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
11 - Culvert 11 - Sta.147 +40 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
173.11 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
175.44 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 175.44
100.00 175.44
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:42:48 AINISentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
11 - Culvert 11 - Sta.147 +40 - Y2Rev1-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -30 inch Circular 50.88 cfs 175.44 ft 14.14 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior400 cfs 175.44 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 50.87 cfs 175.44 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:55 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
11 - Culvert 11 - Sta.147 +40 - Y2Rev1-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew 175.44 ft
Inlet Control HW Elev. 175.44 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 175.26 ft
Headwater Depth /Height 1.86
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
50.88 cfs
170.00 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
170.80 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
169.50 ft
0.036111 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream
S2
Steep
Supercritical
14.14 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.72 ft
1.40 ft
2.31 ft
0.011364 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
Sec@wrM iblHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 30 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
2.50 ft
2.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
175.26 ft
0.20
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
1.79 ft
0.36 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 175.44 ft
Inlet Type Beveled ring, 33.7° bevels
K 0.00180
M 2.50000
C 0.02430
Y 0.83000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
4.9 ft2
3
B
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:42:55 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
11 - Culvert 11 - Sta.147 +40 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
175.44 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
175.44 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 175.44
100.00 175.44
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:42:55 ArRentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

CREEK
\ OULVE0 / /A 1
-- -
PROPOSED GREENWAY \
TRAIL
/ `� 4x40,..
O<ILVERT 12
// / } ' �� DELINEATIONS
1 ~ i ,IiJ15 AC
% \
TC PATH \ /�
i \ !
- A-
1 �
� 1
1

Culvert Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 12
Location: - Y2Revl- 162 +65
Drainage Area:
Time of Concentration:
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Sub -Area 1
Acres
C
Acres
I C
4.ZL__L
1
12.115
0.033
1 0.900
12.082
1 0.500
0.501
6.071
Shallow Conc. Flow:
985
Totals
12.115
0.0640
6.071
4.02
Time of Concentration:
Discharge:
A = 12.115 acres C = 0.5011 T = 20.35016 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
3.56
4.ZL__L
4.70
Sheet Flow:
230
255
240
0.0652
0.24
16.33
Shallow Conc. Flow:
985
240
177
0.0640
Unpaved
4.02
Open Channel Flow:
150
177
172
0.0333
0.08
1.37
Time
of Concentration =
20.35
Discharge:
A = 12.115 acres C = 0.5011 T = 20.35016 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
1 10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
3.56
4.ZL__L
4.70
5.42
5.98
6.54
Discharge, Q (cfs)
21.62
25.61
1 28.54
32.90
36.33
39.71

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
12 - Culvert 12 - Sta.162 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 28.54 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 28.54 cfs Check Discharge 32.60 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 172.40 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1 -42 inch Circular 28.53 cfs 174.90 ft 8.60 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatiorq00 cfs 174.90 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 28.53 cfs 174.90 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:02 AISentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
12 - Culvert 12 - Sta.162 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev,
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
174.90 ft
174.65 ft
174.90 ft
0.74
Discharge 28.53 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 172.40 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.30 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
171.90 ft
0.011111 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 8.60 fUs
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.32 ft
1.19 ft
1.65 ft
0.003367 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SectBmrrM izhIHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 42 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
3.50 ft
3.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
174.90 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.64 ft
0.32 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 174.65 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
9.6 ft'
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:02 AlBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
12 - Culvert 12 - Sta.162 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
174.90 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
178.19 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 178.19
100.00 178.19
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:02 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
12 - Culvert 12 - Sta.162 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:43:10 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert-1
1 -42 inch Circular 91.06 cfs
178.19 ft
11.85 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatior( 00 cfs
178.19 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 91.06 cfs
178.19 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:43:10 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
12 - Culvert 12 - Sta.162 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
178.19 ft
178.19 ft
177.83 ft
1.68
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
91.06 cfs
172.40 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.30 ft
36.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
171.90 ft
0.011111 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 11.85 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
2.61 ft
2.35 ft
2.96 ft
0.006631 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
Sec0mrrL iJtIHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 42 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
3.50 ft
3.50 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
177.83 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
1.71 ft
0.86 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 178.19 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
9.6 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:43:10 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
12 - Culvert 12 - Sta.162 +65 - Y2Rev1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
178.19 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
178.19 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 178.19
100.00 178.19
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:10 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Crabtree Creek - Culvert 13
Location: - Y2Revl- 169 +95
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
C
1
4.140
0.024
1 0.900
4.116
0.500
0.502
2.080
Totals
4.140
12.83
2.080
A = 4.140 acres C = 0.5023 T = 15.509725 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft /ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
3.99
4.69
5.20
5.97
6.58
Sheet Flow:
110
211
208
0.0273
0.24
12.83
Shallow Conc. Flow:
600
208
176
0.0533
Unpaved
2.68
Open Channel Flow:
40
176
174
0.0500
0.08
0.42
Time
of Concentration =
15.51
A = 4.140 acres C = 0.5023 T = 15.509725 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr.)
3.99
4.69
5.20
5.97
6.58
7.17
Discharge, Q (cfs)
8.31
9.75
10.81
12.42
13.68
14.92

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
13 - Culvert 13 - Sta.169 +95 - Y2Rev1
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 10.81 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 10.81 cfs Check Discharge 12.42 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 172.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -24 inch Circular 10.81 cfs 174.41 ft 7.96 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant ElevatiorOj00 cfs 174.41 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 10.81 cfs 174.41 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:19 ArBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
13 - Culvert 13 - Sta.169 +95 - Y2Rev1
Component: Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
174.41 ft
174.27 ft
174.41 ft
0.96
Discharge 10.81 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 172.50 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.50 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
172.00 ft
0.015625 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 7.96 fUs
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.89 ft
0.82 ft
1.18 ft
0.004559 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SecQorrGAdI-IDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 24 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
174.41 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.49 ft
0.24 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 174.27 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
3.1 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:19 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
13 - Culvert 13 - Sta.169 +95 - Y2Rev1
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
174.41 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
176.71 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 176.71
100.00 176.71
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:19 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
13 - Culvert 13 - Sta.169 +95 - Y2Rev1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:27 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert -1
1 -24 inch Circular 26.75 cfs
176.71 ft
10.16 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatiorg00 cfs
176.71 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 26.75 cfs
176.71 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:27 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
13 - Culvert 13 - Sta.169 +95 - Y2Rev1
Component: Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
176.71 ft
176.71 ft
176.18 ft
2.11
Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type
26.75 cfs
172.50 ft
Inlet Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
172.50 ft
32.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
172.00 ft
0.015625 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 10.16 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
1.56 ft
1.45 ft
1.80 ft
0.010477 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SecQorrhA itlHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 24 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
176.18 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
1.25 ft
0.63 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 176.71 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Submerged
3.1 ftz
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01 ]
02/22/12 08:43:27 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
13 - Culvert 13 - Sta.169 +95 - Y2Rev1
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
EIev.(ft)
Discharge
0.00 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
176.71 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.90 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
176.71 ft
Headwater Elevation
N/A ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.90
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft)
EIev.(ft)
0.00
176.71
100.00
176.71
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:27 ANSentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

TIONS
1
1
I �
PROPOSED GREENWAY
14.954 AC

By: CC Date: 2/21/2012
Checked: BC Date: 2/21/2012
STEWART
Project:
Job Number:
Description:
Location:
Lower Neuse Greenway
H9001.00
Crabtree Creek - Culvert 14
- Y2Rev1- 181 +15
Sub -Area
Area
(acres)
Imervious Area
Pervious Area
Cw
CA
Acres
C
Acres
114.897
C
1
14.954
0.057
1 0.900
Sheet Flow:
0.500
0.502
7.500
Totals
14.954
25.36
7.500
A = 14.954 acres C = 0.5015 T = 32.584821 min.
Length
L (ft)
Elev. 1
Elev. 2
Slope
s (ft/ft)
Manning's
n
Travel Time
T (min.)
Sub -Area 1
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
2.61
3.18
3.60
4.19
4.66
Sheet Flow:
280
231
222
0.0321
0.24
25.36
Shallow Conc. Flow:
1365
222
170
0.0381
Unpaved
7.22
Open Channel Flow:
215
170
166
0.0186
0.08
2.26
Time of Concentration =
32.58
A = 14.954 acres C = 0.5015 T = 32.584821 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2
5
10
25
50
100
Intensity, I (in. /hr. )
2.61
3.18
3.60
4.19
4.66
5.13
Discharge, Q (cfs)
19.60
23.85
26.98
31.44
34.95
38.45

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
14 - Culvert 14 - Sta.181 +15 - Y2Rev1
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 26.98 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: User - Specified
Design Discharge 26.98 cfs Check Discharge 31.44 cfs
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 167.30 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert -1 1 -36 inch Circular 26.62 cfs 171.48 ft 13.28 ft/s
Weir Roadway (Constant Elevatior438 cfs 171.48 ft N/A
Total ---------- - - - - -- 27.00 cfs 171.48 ft N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:36 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
14 - Culvert 14 - Sta.181 +15 - Y2Rev1
Component:Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev�
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
171.48 ft
171.21 ft
171.48 ft
0.89
Discharge 26.62 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 167.30 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
168.80 ft
44.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
166.70 ft
0.047727 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 13.28 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.98 ft
0.83 ft
1.67 ft
0.003829 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SecQ"rM3>&itHDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 36 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
3.00 ft
3.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
171.48 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.68 ft
0.34 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 171.21 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
7.1 ftz
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:36 Argentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
14 - Culvert 14 - Sta.181 +15 - Y2Rev1
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway (Constant Elevation)
Discharge
0.38 cfs
Allowable HW Elevation
171.48 ft
Roadway Width
18.00 ft
Overtopping Coefficient
2.91 US
Length
100.00 ft
Crest Elevation
171.47 ft
Headwater Elevation
171.48 ft
Discharge Coefficient (Cr)
2.91
Submergence Factor (Kt)
1.00
Sta (ft) EIev. (ft)
0.00 171.47
100.00 171.47
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 (03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:36 A?r8entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
14 - Culvert 14 - Sta.181 +15 - Y2Rev1
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:43:44 Ardentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3
Overtopping Analysis
Name
Description Discharge
HW Elev.
Velocity
Culvert-1
1 -36 inch Circular 26.42 cfs
171.47 ft
13.26 ft/s
Weir
Roadway (Constant Elevatior4 00 cfs
171.47 ft
N/A
Total
---------- - - - - -- 26.41 cfs
171.47 ft
N/A
Title: Upper Neuse GreenWay Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.011
02/22/12 08:43:44 Ardentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer /Analyzer Report
14 - Culvert 14 - Sta.181 +15 - Y2Rev1
Component:Culvert -1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth /Height
171.47 ft
171.20 ft
171.47 ft
0.89
Discharge 26.42 cfs
Tailwater Elevation 167.30 ft
Control Type Entrance Control
Grades
Upstream Invert
Length
168.80 ft
44.00 ft
Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope
166.70 ft
0.047727 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2
Slope Type Steep
Flow Regime Supercritical
Velocity Downstream 13.26 ft/s
Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
0.97 ft
0.83 ft
1.66 ft
0.003820 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular
SecQaTrh it1HDPE (Smooth Interior)
Section Size 36 inch
Number Sections 1
Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise
0.012
3.00 ft
3.00 ft
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke
171.47 ft
0.50
Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss
0.67 ft
0.34 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 171.20 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w /headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000
Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form
Unsubmerged
7.1 ftz
1
1
1
Title: Upper Neuse Green Way Project Engineer: Drew Baird
t: \... \culverts \2012.02.22 cc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2 [03.02.00.01]
02/22/12 08:43:44 AMentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1- 203 - 755 -1666 Page 2 of 3

STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Swale from Sta. 89 +55 to 90 +40 -Y2- RT.
PROJECT: Neuse River Trail
10 YEAR STORM
DATE: 2012.02.22
REVISED:
WEIGHTED C - VALUE
PERVIOUS AREA = 0.215 (Ac.)
PERVIOUS C = 0.350
IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.020 (Ac.)
IMPERVIOUS C = 0.950
TOTAL AREA = 0.235 (Ac.)
WEIGHTED C = 0.401
RATIONAL METHOD
WEIGHTED C = 0.401
INTENSITY 10YR = 7.22 (in /hr)
TOTAL AREA = 0.235 (Ac.)
TOTAL FLOW = 0.68 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.030 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.008 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.15
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 0.50 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 00 Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y *D *S Tractive Force ( # /sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4 # /cf)
D = DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL (ft)
S = SLOPE OF CHANNEL (ft/ft)
T = 0.2 ( # /sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET
0.45 ( # /sq ft)
I CURLED MAT
1.55 ( # /sq ft)
N PSRM
3.20 ( # /sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP
3.50 ( # /sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP
5.00 ( # /sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP
7.50 ( # /sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 0.75 (sq /ft)
WP = 3.16 (ft)
R = 0.24
Z ACTUAL= 0.29 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. =
0.15
V = 1.70 (ft/sec)
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: JUTE NET 0.45 # /sq ft > 0.2 # /sq ft
(TOPWIDTH)
3 ft
0.5 ft \
(DEPTH)
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27601 Tel [phone] Fax [phone] www.stewart- eng.com

STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Swale from Sta. 180 +60 to 181 +00 - Y2REV1- RT.
PROJECT: Neuse River Trail
10 YEAR STORM
DATE: 2012.02.22
REVISED:
WEIGHTED C - VALUE
PERVIOUS AREA = 0.561 (Ac.)
PERVIOUS C = 0.350
IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.000 (Ac.)
IMPERVIOUS C = 0.950
TOTAL AREA = 0.561 (Ac.)
WEIGHTED C = 0.350
RATIONAL METHOD
WEIGHTED C = 0.350
INTENSITY 10YR = 7.22 (in /hr)
TOTAL AREA = 0.561 (Ac.)
TOTAL FLOW = 1.42 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.030 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.016 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.23
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 0.50 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft) Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y *D *S Tractive Force ( # /sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4 # /cf)
D = DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL (ft)
S = SLOPE OF CHANNEL (ft/ft)
T = 0.5 ( # /sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET
0.45 ( # /sq ft)
I CURLED MAT
1.55 ( # /sq ft)
N PSRM
3.20 ( # /sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP
3.50 ( # /sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP
5.00 ( # /sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP
7.50 ( # /sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 0.75 (sq /ft)
WP = 3.16 (ft)
R = 0.24
Z ACTUAL= 0.29 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. =
0.23
V = 2.41 (ft/sec)
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING : PSRM 3.20 # /sq ft > 0.5 # /sq ft
(TOPWIDTH)
3 ft
_
0.5 ft \ /
(DEPTH) \
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27601 Tel [phone] Fax [phone] www.stewart- eng.com

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 S. NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919- 212 -1760 • FAX [phone]
www ,environmentalservicesinc.com
Februaty 3, 2010
Ms. Iona Thomas
Stewart Engineering, Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street
Suite 440
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Lower Neuse Greenway
Wake County, NC
Dear Ms, Thomas:
ESI Project Number ER08 -140
Thank you for contacting Environmental Services, Inc,, (ESI) concerning the above referenced project.
At your request, ESI has conducted a natural resources investigation including a wetland/stream
delineation, Neuse River riparian buffer rules review, a threatened and endangered species habitat
evaluation, and a preliminary cultural and archaeological resource assessment on the approximately 27.4 -
mile Lower Neuse Greenway project in Wake County, North Carolina. This letter report serves as the
deliverable for this project.
The project includes a proposed greenway along the Neuse River from the Wake/Johnston County Line to
the Horseshoe Farm Park (north of US 401) (Figure 1) and includes additional greenways along Crabtree
Creek and Walnut Creek. The project study area is approximately 1,000 acres (ac) in areal extent,
encompassing a corridor approximately 27.4 miles [144,672 feet (ft)] in length and ranges fi-om 120 to
300 ft in width. Prior to the initiation of field efforts, available resources were reviewed, including the
appropriate U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute topographic quadrangles (Clayton, NC, Garner,
NC, Knightdale, NC, Raleigh East, NC, Rolesville, NC and Wake Forest, NC), Soil Survey for Wake
County, and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database.
The project is broken into seven sections (1 -7). Below is a brief description of each section.
Section 1— This section begins at the Wake/Johnston County Line on the north side of the Neuse River
and extends approximately 1.5 miles `vest where it crosses to the southwest side of the Neuse River. At
this point, the proposed trail breaks away from the Neuse River for approximately 3 A miles, then runs
west and then north to avoid the existing City of Raleigh Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility, and
returns to the south side of the Neuse River, cast of Auburn- Knightdale Road (SR 2555). Section 1 ends
approximately 500 ft north of Auburn - Knightdale Road. Section I is approximately 5.8 miles long, has a
project study area width of 300 ft, and includes one bridge crossing over the Neuse River.
FLORIDA • GEORGIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • OHIO

ENVIRONMENTAL, SERVICES, INC.
Page 2 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
Section 2 -- This section begins at the terminus of Section 1, approximately 500 ft north of Auburn -
Knightdale Road, and extends north along the west side of the Neuse River to Poole Road (SR 1007).
Section 2 is approximately 2.7 miles long, has a project study area width of 300 ft, and includes one
bridge crossing of Walnut Creek.
Section 3 — This section begins at the terminus of Section 2 on the north side of Poole Road and extends
north along the west side of the Neuse River to the south side of Crabtree Creek and the southern
boundary of Anderson Point Park. Section 3 is approximately 1.1 miles long, has a project study area
width of 300 ft, and includes one bridge crossing of Crabtree Creek.
Section 4 — This section begins at the terminus of Section 3 along the southern boundary of Anderson
Point Park at Crabtree Creek and extends north along the west side of the Neuse River along an existing
gravel trail to the future Skycrest Road {just north of the Hedingham Subdivision). Section 4 is
approximately 3.3 miles long and has a project study area width of 120 ft (60 ft centered on the existing
gravel trail). There are no Neuse River bridge crossings associated with Section 4 at this time. Bridges
Lake has an existing wooden bridge that will be utilized.
Section 5 — This section begins at the terminus of Section 4 on the north side of the future Skycrest Road,
crosses to the east side of the Neuse River and extends north along the east side of the Neuse River for
approximately 1.7 miles and then crosses to the west side of the Neuse River near the Buffalo Road
Athletic Park. The proposed trail continues north along the west side of the Neuse River to Horseshoe
Farm Park. Section 5 is approximately 6.9 miles long and has a project study area width of 300 ft.
Section 5 includes a total of four bridge crossings of the Neuse River, including two bridge crossings
associated with connecting the proposed trail with Horseshoe Farm Park.
Section 6 — This section begins approximately 300 ft west of the confluence of Walnut Creek and the
Neuse River (in Section 2) and extends along the south side of Walnut Creek for 0.75 mile before
crossing to the north side of Walnut Creek. Section 6 continues west along the north side of Walnut
Creek through the existing Walnut Creek Softball Complex and ends at the existing Worthdale Park.
Section 6 is approximately 3.7 miles long and has a project study area width of 300 ft. Section 6 includes
one bridge crossing of Walnut Creek.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 3 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
Section 7 — This section begins along the western boundary of Anderson Point Park and extends west
approximately 1,000 feet where it then crosses to the southwest side of Crabtree Creek. Section 7
continues west approximately 1.3 miles along the south side of Crabtree Creek before crossing to the
north side of Crabtree Creek, then continues west along the north side of Crabtree Creek to the west side
of New Bern Avenue (US 64 Business). Approximately 2,000 ft west of New Bern Avenue the proposed
trail crosses to the west/south side of Crabtree Creek and ties into the existing Buckeye Trail. Section 7 is
approximately 33 miles long and has a project study area width of 300 ft. Section 7 includes three bridge
crossings of Crabtree Creek.
Staff Experience
The project study area `vas reviewed from January through December 2009 by ESI biologists Gail Tyner,
Kevin Markham, Robert Turnbull, Katie Tomany, Todd Milam, and Charles Johnston. Ms. Tyner is a
Senior Scientist with more than 11 years of professional experience. Mr. Markham is a Senior Scientist
and Regional Division Director with more than 21 years of professional experience. Mr. Markham holds
state and federal permits for in- stream dwarf wedgemussel surveys and was responsible for the dwarf
wedgemusel habitat evaluation. Mr. Turnbull is a Senior Scientist with more than seven years of
professional experience. Ms. Tomany is a Project Scientist with more than six years of professional
experience. Mr. Milam is a Project Scientist with more than five years of professional experience. Mr.
Johnston is a Senior Scientist with more than four years of professional experience,
Water Resources
The project study area is located within the Neuse River drainage basin. There are four named streams
within the project study area [the Neuse River, Bridges Creek (Bridges Lake), Crabtree Creek, and
Walnut Creek]. The Neuse River has been assigned Stream Index Number (SIN) 27- (22.5) and 27 -(36)
within the project study area. The Neuse River [SIN 27- (22.5)], from the Town of Wake Forest proposed
water supply intake to the mouth of Beddingfield Creek, has a Best Usage Classification (BUC) of
C;NSW. The portion of the Neuse River, from the mouth of Beddingfield Creek to a point 0.2 mile
downstream of Johnston County SR 1700 [S1N 27- (36)], has a BUC of WS -V; NSW. The portions of
Bridges Creek (Bridges Lake) (SIN 27 -30), Crabtree Creek [SIN 27- 33- (10)], and Walnut Creek [SIN 27-
34-(4)] within the project study area have a BUC of C; NSW. Class C waters are protected for secondary
recreation, fishing, aquatic Iife (including propagation and survival), and wildlife. Secondary recreation
is any activity involving human body contact with water on an infrequent or incidental basis. The
supplemental classification NSW indicates Nutrient Sensitive Waters, which require limitations on
nutrient inputs. Class WS -V waters are waters protected as water supplies which are generally upstream
of and drain to Class WS -)[V waters; or previously used for drinking water supply purposes or waters
used by industry to supply their employees with a raw drinking water source. Class WS -IV waters are

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 4 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
waters protected as water supplies, which are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds.
Point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of
T15A;02BA100. Local programs to control nonpoint source and stormwater discharges of pollution are
required and these waters are suitable for all Class C uses,
Plant Communities
Dominant community types within the project study area consist of a Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest
and disturbed successional communities associated with utility corridors. Typical overstory vegetation
observed within the Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest community includes box elder (Ater negundo),
American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), river birch (Betula nigra),
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and musclewood (Carpinus caroliniana). Typical understory
species observed within this community includes American. elm (Ulmus americana), slippery elm (Uhnus
rubra), spice bush (Lindera benzoin), buckeye (Aesculus sylvatica), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea),
river oats (Chasmanthium latifolium), and poison ivy (Toxicodend)-on radicans). The vegetation within
the utility corridors includes successional species such as lespedeza (Lespedeza sp.) and dog fennel
(Eupatoriuni sp.)
Soils
There are 40 soil mapping units represented within the project study area (Figure 2). The following
table includes a brief description of the project study area soils.
Table 1. Proiect Study Area Soils
Soil magging Unit
Map Symbol
Drainage Class
Roanoke fine sandy loam
Ra
poorly drained
Wehadkee silt loam
Wn
poorly drained
Wehadkee and Bibb soils
Wo
poorly drained
Worsham sandy loam
poorly drained
Altalvista fine sandy loam (0 -4 % slopes)
AfA
moderately well drained
Augusta fine sandy loam
Au
somewhat poorly
Buncombe soils
Bu
somewhat excessively drained
Chewacla soils
Cm
somewhat poorly
Colfax sandy loam
Cn
somewhat poorly drained
Conagree fine sandy loam
Co
well drained
Mantachie soils
Me
somewhat poorly drained
Wahee fine sandy loam
Wh
somewhat poor!X drained
Appling sandy loath (2 -6% slopes)
A B
well drained
Appling sandy loam 2 -6% slopes), eroded
A B2
well drained
Table 1 continues,

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 5 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
January 2010
Table 1 continued,
Soil Mapping Unit
Map Symbol
Drainage Class
Appling sandy loam 6 -10% slopes)
A C
well drained
Appling sandy loam 6 -10% slopes), eroded
A C2
well drained
Appang sandy loam (10 -15% slopes)
A D
well drained
Cecil sandy loam (15 -45% slopes)
CeF
well drained
Cecil clay loam (6 -10% slopes), severely eroded
C1B3
well drained
Conagree silt loam
CP
well drained
Durham loamy sand (2 -6% slopes)
DuB
well drained
Durham loamy sand 2 -6% slopes), eroded
DuB2
well drained
Durham loamy sand 6 -10% slopes)
DuC
well drained
Durham loamy sand 6 -10% slopes), eroded
DuC2
well drained
Faceville sandy loam (2 -6% slopes)
FaB
well drained
Faceville sand y loam (2 -6% slopes), eroded
FaB2
well drained
Louisburg loamy sand 2 -6% slopes)
LoB
somewhat excessively drained
Louisburg loamy sand (6 -10% slopes)
LoC
somewhat excessively drained
LouisbEg loam sand 10 -15% slopes)
LoD
somewhat excessively drained
Louisburg - Wedowee Complex (2 -6% slopes)
LwB
somewhat excessively drained
Louisburg-Wedowee Complex (6 -10% slopes), eroded
LNvC2
somewhat excessively drained
Vance sandy loam (2 -6% slopes), eroded
VaB2
well drained
Wagram loamy sand, (6 -10% slopes)
WaC
somewhat excessively drained
Wake soils (10 -25% slopes)
WkE
somewhat excessively drained
Wedowee sandy loam 2 -6% slopes)
WmB
well drained
Wedowee sandy loam (2 -6% slopes), eroded
WmB2
well drained
Wedowee sandy loam (6 -10% slopes)
WmC
well drained
Wedowee sandy loam (6 -10% slopes), eroded
WmC2
well drained
Wedowee sandy loam 10 -15% slopes), eroded
WmD2
well drained
Wedowee sandy loam (15 -25% slopes)
WmE
well drained
Wetland and Stream Delineation
The project study area was reviewed to determine the presence or absence of jurisdictional wetland areas
using the three - parameter approach (hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and evidence of jurisdictional
hydrology) as outlined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). N.C. Division of Water Quality
(NCD.WQ) and USACE standards were used to determine the presence or absence of jurisdictional
streams and jurisdictional surface waters within the project study area. The jurisdictional delineation was
reviewed by the NCDWQ for Neuse River Riparian Buffer Applicability (March 24 and July 15 and 16,
2009). As of the date of this report, the jurisdictional delineation has not been reviewed by the USACE,
although ESI has asked the USACE on several occasions to consider a site visit.
There are 88 jurisdictional stream channels (including the Neuse River, Crabtree Creek, and Walnut
Creek), nine jurisdictional ponds, and 104 jurisdictional wetland areas located within the project study
area (Figures 3a -m and Tables B -1 and B -2 in Appendix B). The jurisdictional areas within each section
are designated with a corresponding letter sequence (i.e„ a wetland in Section 1 is labeled as WAl and a

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 6 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
stream feature in Section 2 is labeled as SB1). Figures 3a -m depict the general layout of the
jurisdictional features within the project study area. Characteristics of each jurisdictional feature within
each section are included in Tables B -1 and B -2. To more accurately depict the amount of jurisdictional
areas within the project study area that could be impacted, EST did not include the linear extent of the
three (3) major stream features (the Neuse River, Crabtree Creek, and Walnut Creek), but provided stream
widths at proposed trail crossings [Bridge Crossings (BC)].
Excluding bridge crossings of the Neuse River, Walnut Creek, and Crabtree Creek, there are 61 other
perennial streams which account for 19,746 linear ft and 24 intermittent streams which account for 4,413
linear ft of stream channel within the project study area. There are approximately 63.6 ac of wetlands and
1.6 ac of jurisdictional ponds within the project study area.
Riparian Buffer Rules Review
The project study area is within the Neuse River basin and is subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules. The riparian buffer consists of two distinct zones. Zone 1 comprises a 30 -ft wide area adjacent to
the surface water that cannot be disturbed except for those specific activities that are allowed by the
Buffer Rules. Zone 2 comprises a 20 -ft wide area adjacent to Zone 1 that is to be left undisturbed except
for those activities specifically allowed by the Buffer Rules. All of the features depicted on either the
most recent versions of the USGS topographic quadrangle or the Wake County Soil Survey maps are
subject to riparian buffer rules, unless an exemption has been obtained from the NCDWQ. Table 2
provides information on which streams are subject to Buffer Rules.
Activities in the buffer area beyond the footprint of the existing use are classified as either "exempt ",
"allowable ", "allowable with mitigation ", or "prohibited" Based on an August 18, 2006 letter
concerning the Upper Neuse Greenway and published guidance from NCDWQ, greenway trails
(Appendix C) are considered an "allowable" activity within the buffers, but written NCDWQ notification
will be required. In addition, the greenway trails should be outside the 50 -ft buffer where possible, should
stay within Zone 2 as much as practicable, and stream crossings should be constructed as near
perpendicular as possible.
"Allowable" activities may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no practicable
alternatives to the requested use. Prior to initiating impacts, written authorization from the NCDWQ or
delegated local authority is required.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 7 of 14
Lower Neuse Green-way
February 2010
During the NCDWQ buffer review, ESI focused on reviewing features that were depicted on the USGS
and/or the Wake County soils mapping as stream features, but were not flagged as jurisdictional or the
entire feature was flagged as a wetland by ESI. Below is a summary of the Neuse River Riparian
Applicability for Lower Neuse Greenway.
WA6, WA12, WD16, WD18i, WEB, and WGI are depicted on the most recent version of the appropriate
USGS topographic quadrangle and/or the Wake County soils mapping as stream features; however, ESI
flagged these features as wetlands (Figures 3a -m). These features have been reviewed by NCDWQ and
were determined to be subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules because they were impounded
stream channels.
WD13, WD18a, WE4, WE5, WE15, WE18, WG6, WG7, and WG8 are depicted on the most recent
version of the appropriate USGS topographic quadrangle and/or the Wake County soils mapping as
stream features, however ESI flagged these features as wetlands (Figures 3a -m). These features have been
reviewed by NCDWQ and determined not to be subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
SA4, SA12, SA17, SCl, SC3, SDI, SD3, SDS, SD8, SD10, SD13, SE9, SE13, and SF2 are not depicted
on the most recent version of the appropriate USGS topographic quadrangle or the Wake County soils
mapping and therefore are not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
SF3, SF8, SF16, and SF18 are considered oxbows or outer braids of Walnut Creek and are subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules even though the specific feature may not be mapped.
WA8, WAIO, WB4, WF5, WF6, WF10 and WFI 8 were not specifically reviewed by NCDWQ for Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Applicability. These features are depicted as streams on the appropriate USGS
and/or the Wake County soils mapping, therefore subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. ESI
flagged portions of these features as streams, but not to the extent shown on the USGS and/or soils
mapping. If the proposed trail is located within or within 50 ft of these features, NCDWQ can make a
final determination on riparian buffer applicability.
The remaining streams within and/or within 50 ft of the project study area depicted on the most recent
version of the appropriate USGS topographic quadrangle and/or the Wake County soils mapping are
subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 8 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
Inland Primaa Nursea Areas
Portions of Neuse River within the project study area have been designated as an Inland Primary Nursery
Area (IPNA) by the N.C. Wildlife Resource Commission. According to the USACE Special Designated
Streams and Waters, IPNAs include 10,000 acres of Inland Fishing Waters in the coastal areas, as well as
portions of the four main rivers (Roanoke River, Tar - Pamlico River, Neuse River, and Cape Fear River)
draining to North Carolina's coast. The Neuse River from Pitchkettle Creek in Craven County to
Milburnie Dam in Wake County is considered to be an Inland Primary Nursery Area. IPNAs are subject
to a moratorium on in- stream work from February to October. Coordination with WRC will be required.
WRC does not typically grant pre - construction variances for the in- stream work moratorium. However,
WRC has the discretion to grant variances, on a case by case basis, at the beginning or end of the
moratorium when the potential impacts to the IPNA and the affected species can be accurately evaluated.
Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation
ESI evaluated the project study area for potential habitat for federally Threatened (T), Endangered (E), or
otherwise protected species known to have ranges extending into Wake County, NC (January 25, 2010
USFWS website list). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) lists four species with federal
protection that have ranges extending into Wake County: bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), red -
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), and Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii). The bald eagle is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(BGEPA) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The other three species are protected under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Records held by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
were reviewed on January 25, 2010 to determine if any of these species have been recorded on or within
1.0 mile of the project study area. A description and review of the project study area for potential habitat
for each of the federally listed species is discussed below.
Bald eagle (BGEPA/MBTA-protected) typically nest in tall, living trees in a conspicuous location near
water and forage over large bodies of water with adjacent trees available for perching. The bald eagle was
officially delisted and removed from the federal Endangered Species List on August 9, 2007, but they are
still protected under the BGEPA and the MBTA. NIP records review indicates no documented nest
sites within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Marginal foraging and roosting habitat for this species
exists within the project study area along the Neuse River. On June 22, 2009, ESI biologists Robert
Turnbull, Katie Tomany, Todd Milam and Charlie Johnston canoed the Neusc River and visually
surveyed along the Neuse River for bald eagle nests, no nests or individuals were observed. The project
should not affect bald eagle. Biological Conclusion: Not Required

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 9 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
Red - cockaded woodpecker (E) is a small woodpecker that nests primarily in open pine stands greater
than 60 years old with little or no mid -story development. Foraging habitat is comprised of open pine or
pine /mixed hardwood stands greater than 30 years old. Primary habitat consists of mature to over - mature
southern pine forests dominated by loblolly (Pines taeda), longleaf (Pinus palustris), slash (Pinus
elliotfl), and pond pines (Pinus sei,oflna). These pine stands must generally be a minimum of 10 ac in
size. Development of a thick understory may result in abandonment of cavity trees. Mixed
pine/hardwood communities within the project study area are hardwood dominated and would not be
considered suitable nesting or foraging habitat. NBP records review indicates no document occurrences
of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Potential habitat for this species does not exist
within the project study area. Biological Conclusion: No Effect,
Dwarf wedgemussel (E) typically inhabits perennial streams with slow to moderate current, good water
quality with little siltation, and with stable banks and substrate. Within these areas, dwarf wedgemussels
are typically found along root mats, around logs, and under overhangs or other relatively protected
microhabitats.
Streams within the project study area were reviewed on June 3 and 9, 2009 by EST biologists Kevin
Markham and Todd Milam. Most of the streams within the project study area were determined to not
provide suitable habitat for dwarf wedgemussel. The unnamed tributaries within the project study area
are generally too small and do not contain suitable substrate. The reaches of Crabtree Creek and Walnut
Creek within the project study area exhibited substrate characterized by relatively extensive deposits of
unconsolidated sediment, with stream banks exhibiting relatively extensive scour with erosion noted
extending upstream and downstream from the project study area. The Neuse River may provide
potentially suitable habitat within the project study area. Relatively stable streambanks and potential
microhabitat areas including root mats, logs, and areas of clay to fine sand substrate were identified
within the Neuse River within the project study area.
No evidence of any native mussel fauna (relict shells) was observed along stream banks or scan of stream
beds; relict shells of the exotic, introduced Asiatic clam (Corbicula flinninea) were observed within the
streambed and along the banks of the Neuse River. A review of NBP records indicates that no extant
occurrences of the dwarf wedgemusssel are documented within 1.0 mile of the project study area. There
is an historic record of dwarf wedgemussel documented within the Neuse River from the vicinity of Poole
Road; NBT represents the general location for this historic occurrence as the reach from approximately
New Bern Avenue to Walnut Creek. This historic occurrence locale was searched extensively in the mid -
1980s as part of the USFWS status survey for the species prior to listing the species as Endangered; the
results of those surveys led to the USFWS conclusion that the species had been extirpated from the Neuse
River.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 10 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
If there were no direct stream impacts (f. e., in- stream work or in- stream structures) proposed for this
project, then there should be no adverse effects to dwarf wedgemussel populations. However, because
potentially suitable habitat was identified within the Neuse River, and Neuse River crossings are
proposed, species specific surveys may be requested by the USIi WS to ensure dwarf wedgemussel is not
present within the project footprint before a determination of effects can be made.
Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
Michaux's sumac (E) tends to grow in disturbed areas where competition is reduced by periodic fire or
other disturbances and may grow along roadside margins or utility easements. Michaux's sumac appears
to prefer sandy or rocky substrates consisting of basic soils. The majority of the project study area would
not be considered potentially suitable habitat for this species due to the forested canopy and thick shrub
layers in successional areas. Potential habitat consisting of open edge areas is present within the project
study area. NHP records review indicate one documented occurrence of this species approximately 1,200
feet south of Walnut Creek adjacent to Barwell Road and one documented occurrence approximately 1.0
mile east of the Neuse River near the intersection of US 64 Business and I -540.
Prior to field investigations, ESI biologists Katie Tomany, Robert Turnbull, and Todd Milam visited the
above referenced Michaux's sumac population in on Barwell Road prior to conducting surveys to confirm
vegetative status. During the spring of 2009, surveys were conducted for this species within the potential
habitat including utility corridor edges, trails, and roadsides. No individuals were observed during
pedestrian surveys through potential habitat in the project study area. No impacts to Michaux's sumac
populations are anticipated as a result of this project. Biological Conclusion; No Effect.
Preliminary Cultural and Archaeological Resource Assessment
A representative of ESI conducted research at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) and the Survey and
Planning Branch (SPB) of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on 27 January
2009. The purpose of the research was to identify recorded cultural resources in and in the vicinity of the
proposed trail, This research revealed the presence of six recorded historic structures, 18 archaeological
sites, a possible mill site, and four fish trapsiwiers (see Tables 2, 3, and 4).

Page I I of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Table 2: Buildings /Structures
Property #
Quad Map(s)
National Register Eligibility Status
Mill Site o #)
Wake Forest
Unknown
WA1142
Wake Forest
Not Eligible
WA1471
Wake Forest
Not Eligible
WA2248
Wake Forest
Not Eligible
WA1677
Raleigh East
Not Eligible
WA1681
Ralei h East
Not Eligible
WA1707
Raleigh East
Not Eligible
Table 3: ArehaeoIoi!ical Sites
Site Trinomial
Component(s)
Quad Map(s)
National Register
Eligibility Status
31WAII37
Prehistoric
Wake Forest
Eligible
31WA1605
Prehistoric
Wake Forest
Not Eligible
31WA1617 **
Historic
Wake Forest
Unassessed
3IWA657
Prehistoric
Wake Forest
Not Eligible
31 WA789
Prehistoric
Wake Forest
Unassessed
31WA1359
Prehistoric /Contact
Raleigh East
Eligible
31WA1360
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Eligible
31WA1370
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Not Eligible
31 WA1371
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Not Eligible
31WA1372
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Not Eligible
31WA1625
Unknown
Raleigh East
Unknown
31 WA27
Unknown
Raleigh East
Unassessed
31 WA519
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Unassessed
31WA574
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Not Eligible
31 WA598
Prehistoric
Raleigh East
Unassessed
31WA214 **
Historic
Raleigh East/Garner
Unassessed
31WA1516
Prehistoric
Garner
Not Eligible
31WA1522
Prehistoric
Garner
Not Eligible
Table 4- Fish Weirs/Trans alone Crabtree Creek and Neuse River
Naive
Quad Map(s)
National Register
Eligibility Status
Gou h's Fish Trap
Raleigh East
Unassessed
Atkin's Fish Trap
Raleigh East
Unassessed
Nutt's Fish Traps
Raleigh East
Unassessed
Fish Weirs (31 214)
Raleigh East/Garner
Unassessed

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 12 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
None of the six recorded historic structures are listed in, eligible for listing in, or potentially eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). The "Mill Site," which is shown
on the maps at the SPB does not pertain to a standing structure. The four fish traps/weirs are all
unassessed regarding their National Register eligibility. Eight of the archaeological sites are not eligible
for the National Register, the eligibility status for six has not been assessed, the eligibility status of one is
unknown, and three have been determined eligible for listing in the National Register.
Of the three National Register eligible archaeological sites, site 31WA1137 is located on the north bank
of the Neuse River at the crossing by US 401. It is opposite the proposed greenway corridor and would
not be affected by the greenway project as currently proposed. Sites 31WA1359 and 31WA1360 were
located within the ROW for the US 64 Knightdale Bypass. It is possible that neither site still exists, but
documentation at the OSA is incomplete.
Of the six unassessed archaeological sites, one is outside the proposed greenway corridor and would not
be affected by the greenway project as currently proposed. Five of the sites, sites 31 WA574, 31WA519,
31WA214, 31WA27, 31WA1617, are located within the proposed greenway corridor and could
potentially be affected by the greenway project as currently proposed. Although the National Register
eligibility status of 31WA1625 is unknown, the site is located across the river from the proposed
greenway corridor and would not be affected by the greenway project as currently proposed.
ESI submitted a coordination letter to the SHPO on 28 January 2009 requesting comment on the proposed
project. In a letter dated 10 March 2009, the SHPO stated that four sites (31WA27, 31WA214,
31 WA519, and 31 WA1617) could be affected by the proposed greenway and have not been evaluated for
their National Register eligibility. Additionally, the SHPO stated that there are archaeological resources
that may be appropriate for interpretation, and specifically noted the 1820 Brazier Map showing the
locations of fish weirs or traps and dams along Crabtree and Walnut creeks, and that similar sites are
known along the Neuse River, The SETO requested additional consultation once more information on
past ground disturbance and construction techniques is available in order to determine if any recorded
archaeological sites would be affected and if any archaeological survey should be conducted. The SBPO
also offered assistance regarding opportunities for interpretation of archaeological resources along the
proposed corridor.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 13 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
Summary
The jurisdictional features within the project study area have been delineated and the attached graphics
indicate their general layout (Figures 3a -m). This general layout is not a substitute for a traditional survey
and is not a legal or recordable document.
There are 88 jurisdictional stream channels (including the Neuse River, Crabtree Creek, and Walnut
Creek), nine jurisdictional ponds, and 104 jurisdictional wetland areas located within the project study
area. Excluding bridge crossings, there are 61 other perennial streams which account for 19,746 linear ft
and 24 intermittent streams which account for 4,413 linear ft of stream channel within the project study
area. There are approximately 63.6 ac of wetlands and 1.6 ac of jurisdictional ponds within the project
study area.
The project study area is subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. There are both buffered and
un- buffered features within the project study area. Please refer to Tables B -1 and B -2 in Appendix A for
details on the applicability of the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules for each feature.
NIP records review did not document any known current occurrences of state or federally protected
species within the project study area. The project study area lacks potential habitat for the federally
protected red - cockaded woodpecker. The project study area contains potential habitat for bald eagle,
dwarf wedgemussel, and Michaux's sumac. The project should have no adverse affect on bald eagle
populations. No impacts to Michaux's sumac populations are anticipated as a result of this project.
Potentially suitable habitat for dwarf wedgemussel within the project study area is limited to the Neuse
River. Additional coordination with USFWS may be required. The USFWS may request surveys be
conducted within the project footprint before a determination of effects can be made.
The SHPO has requested that additional consultation with their office be conducted to determine if any of
the unassessed, previously recorded archaeological sites will be impacted by the proposed greenway and
if any stretch of the proposed greenway will need an intensive archaeological survey. Additionally, the
SHPO has requested additional consultation regarding historic structures once the final location of the
greenway has been determined.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Page 14 of 14
Lower Neuse Greenway
February 2010
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) appreciates the opportunity to offer you our services. If you have any
questions or comments, or need any additional information, please feel fi'ee to contact me at (919) 212-
1760.
Sincerely,
ENV NMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Gail Tyner
Senior Project Manager
Attached: Appendix A: Figures
Appendix B: Jurisdictional Tables
Appendix C: Correspondence
Appendix D: Data Forms

Appendix A
Figures

z W r�� E
io p a m a g°, 'Y � a n+ \ C O N U
H2, c
p m `m m moo° n�� (QJ�
N m b a a o m a� ti €- e Q} LL
m N U > N N y m 6 m m C. 0 0 Z E m r,. •'' ' T ''• ` Q. x
C. 3' U1 N' m 61 N m m p• Q N a 0 N N .W •Q o ° I J U
N m m a r O N O y -X o
V o O• a 0 o N 6 0 N a m N - 0 0
eF Q- a
y r N N N N m !h N e -11
r O a O N Q
3 �o a oo -° E° ° c�o�°a o yE
E cp YEN cu co co cV a N cb r . sn o W _
m o o N m 0 0 0c t °z a]
Fj. co pNN66 �o N N 'cs •a N E E E E N c o m w O �_ °c
co c - TE E E E Tp ° c c m ccrs m NQ o 0 0 oa �' ° °3 m°
-� c N Ca td to a �p E ca m 0 N N E u� m 0 m o° L+
0 O o o 0 N N T �+ T N (0 N A T T �• •p c p
C O rN N N Ta E E O cc cc� G a R U mS °ao d m
0 C T T T T N m C C --
O -- m a a a a m@ 'o n c E E c m o m co m m m
c c c c c o N a- m o o N o
m m ca caa~ �,ro c m °_° N a»�� v m m 0i m c Nm
L N N N N m L CO o m m m m m O 0 a .
cis ro m U _ N SG � o E n�
0 N c c N a m X cd M m '> m N o o 0 o m U Z d c c p iD
U}
m c- 3a m L m us N c n Y a a a a c o °- n
0 L U v a° n c a �' 0- o o� c m o o m m m m m � � �� "Q o E �
Z ¢ UZ aQddd¢UC.�UC�an�����������
—� dmmVU �M E c ommmm❑ mmYmUA 0 Wo8` ��'�� ��•.
N / m E : c ---- .".—/ . 9S/l 7,
v m 3'
\ 1 0 W 9a
' � U
n o i 3 J 3
sc E o f ` m cv
c a m
/ 1 r - -
�,' ► is ! — ��'�� 11 m q L) o m
3 v I I a y m cl
co
M m
m °> l m a J'•
D
.... ��j T.%
¢ `} 4 N
0 N j m
I n (p - q
4 m
w ,
vy E
oo
cli
�.
E
1 /
��LjBlJ v
N
1� �`• 0
4
C
N
J
0
[i O� d
C]
C]
LL
N
U •., m ` w
cl
E - d
ev
cv c E CJ S
a } • Q ,� Of
! 0
° W
CL
2 E m �••' '
d
b' z V•
C.3 .x a
E � �
� m J
m m
N a 0
3 r
m J
w
. Q (j �� s
cl
q m 0
0
{ 4 O 5 J o
1`
c �'
° U 1
v 4 �• N
W 4 4 p
� E
a �
C] N U ?
V� z E m d
RP vk QQ bRAti
�0
E
�
r .
o
..' i. -8a�• Q h
fi
m v J 4} n _ ! ` o
LM (N ° •? e cE V r ` 1
LL k
Cal /W to
0 1
° ¢ v° E
CL _
C
O
G3 U
o 0
cd z°
N
zZ o
U
3co
J 31
05 8Vo
oms
mNN q
Waamm C
d
<J

Ne 611 �:' Q Oo` `i O o I-
CIE
_o ° j ' a - w
i`-
L[J / ` - � y Q N .� U � mod" I �� � � N � � U • �-' Ci
], t_
CD
f U 'dd Q m C)
CMN
CL
l a a o i LL
94
CC
ca
cx
II U
Qo > >
m 4 1 n w \ 03
U rte'' I O d > ' n < O
¢
CID _,,, DN .
/ 0 II ■ LL U �a� a0 :nG `� uI �a ,�' `
CIS
O 4 m I
O 4 J \
E U
II
CL E
CL
a a° a ri o , ° c' �' an ro
Q�/ T a ��e -' �`. `��6 a _ •o N C13
a ' it ��ti ��+ E ti
O a `t' U
�S 4 Q _ m N
II . n q Q O O� \ q �`�� G.� 1, o N , • , L-: + + > ¢ 41 Z
U �G N�
n ❑
II �� O 1mJ ¢ d Q
�I o m z Z o
4J
n It 44
a3 6P b� Jp U GAF vo a ' v °G
o
OL
O
w S
E U I J� . -1
` o
CL CL
U_
cli
�-
itS`
ma l > r�0 ���
ca o 4 d
a
C' m
V
� I • i �
d /
N d l
m
c m
.�.i o
V m
N
p c E
prP 1_ .0
Q y
xrmo $
szlClihKm..
2� o
S
0
o a
0 0
ammm
-O O
Q1
CIO
N Q) (D
�
a CD
�d
n m ui
O to N o N Gl N O
1�
Q
Z
rn o.0. 0 0 0 d 0.@
�,
X
....
.It.
Cf
W � °� ID 2
0.
>
>
.I�rjr
c
4
l
N
J >
O N
QJ O
O_
°
m U n a ao n
o CO O
�000b+!?� ON
.
p� r- O
>
a J�
Q
Qry
N@@@�
,�,�
T E E E E E Ar C@ N
o 0 0 D�
X
aooaQc
0
cx
Lo m
C%j
`'
0
a
p
O y 7. _C @
@ N @ @
CO
c � ? ° c
CD
N
N r
N O O 0
O O N N
\
p a a
a n
4
O
Q
X
N O O O
U
m
O
•G F CV �
— .
a D L O c N
Q O
�d N N
mEC
O
a m p
s
QQQQQQUV VULLJ����i��
(
o m
�II)Z
Q m m U U 3 E C O Cfl Q 01
CL
NN
Y U (� O
N o_a�
mo`
II II Ilo
< a- :4 CL UUUULL, -i
.�.i o
V m
N
p c E
prP 1_ .0
Q y
xrmo $
szlClihKm..
2� o
S
0
o a
0 0
ammm
-O O
Q1
o a m
N Q) (D
�
a CD
n m ui
O to N o N Gl N O
m
n 0 0
E
Z
rn o.0. 0 0 0 d 0.@
O N N
x a
W � °� ID 2
NN Ul (N N u-i
Lp In
O. c
'o a o -° ° o
0 0 o f/1
O o o N LO n
E
O N
QJ O
O_
°
m U n a ao n
o CO O
�000b+!?� ON
.
p� r- O
.fix
Imo
-O
O w f0 T O In 7+ E C
N@@@�
W C'c
T E E E E E Ar C@ N
o 0 0 D�
X
aooaQc
0
0 0 0 0 0
y� '
Lo m
v °
m
T
N
u@61
a
t NU °m
O y 7. _C @
@ N @ @
@
C
c � ? ° c
N
N r
N O O 0
O O N N
a
O
p a a
a n
.@+ @ U Sn i
C C Ci G ,
N
X
N O O O
U
Z d cE< A a
•G F CV �
— .
a D L O c N
Q O
�d N N
mEC
O
a m p
s
QQQQQQUV VULLJ����i��
(
o m
�II)Z
Q m m U U 3 E C O Cfl Q 01
CL
NN
Y U (� O
N o_a�
mo`
II II Ilo
< a- :4 CL UUUULL, -i
.�.i o
V m
N
p c E
prP 1_ .0
Q y
xrmo $
szlClihKm..
2� o
S
0

U p W q b 3 U �pC p C7
oy
o L7 j �y
cli m ¢
-1 n. 1
CL
LLI a n < '} � i .��
9 I'll U I A G LCOEL
CIL d -1 'IFNI G
1 ' C QL s op o ,
ca 21
A CL
J
ca
Q �a
.fir �'\ 4 ¢ •',_ ` Qo �` •,� o c3n� ai �;
cl
` OL ` \
3 m ,� to
o �... ` ' \ r a ¢ ¢ 1 X01 �, �\ o m
�1'EUS Qi Rfile, d
n
i -�''- m Q i3 J �� � _' � d c a • ��
1 U U -
� Lj • ` 1 � ! U V . cv C� C�
co
ca
VCL m IC v t; ! W 4iJ x , Q ! d
CL CL
CL F/ d 4a Q �8 ,' \ 5 .. V a• v n l� ' ~U Z�av • A n
a o� �
cl
CIL
o
Ij CL V4
�. J / Q U m C3 yo
CL 0
ki
-
a o w U h a
U tom. • • � ; - ' ¢ - � ao
C2 �h - -_ . o� �, d
0
O J 1 V d
cl
C
_ I I
o
m QW ,
0
o n a X a o o �W i 20
d n '3 0 c
CI x
,p q _ 8
o o m N oq v� In a �o °mom_
�� i' I �� O y y o 0 41 0 Or i Vl @ o y� am2n
�• ,, ~.'' Q Jf' o a O O fp O 0 I()
}y, a ., �, E cn r E @ c� co .-- car
>1 t x @ i O@ O N - O O C o 5�4c in
b�' s F , � •� O N N m [4 r p T i -0-0-0 N E
co
`l\ 1 �� - . ca -� `�r-ti •'. ' _- '� @ @ @ lC @ C ° a T TAN T O O N m o
r C O 0 0 0 0 0 N m �+ O v y o m m
CL a f! 2` , O, 1 t Q G- 1�, ... N a T T T N y E E E o c= c c ° v'. a°
Q I ` U_ 1 ` 1`I N ..ZaL _ o yz3aav°roc °000 @'v� @� @ r{n°
C N w= @
�f C m Q ai m re y :~ A m w o, rn o, °_ o f am a
a° y� y '� co E is z a 3 o E
Q _ may' ..o Un y C, C CiI O1 Ol (4 @ .- .C] y > 'O 'P
Lj -� �).• _ 4.Sr f. �• l/ a'a n a a rn a) a �, 'o +gym a�i was L4, o +a o
EL EL EL
v 1 Q ° r' ` N j U Q¢CQQQ (iu4L.1J7 uy Ema
y --' Q m cmp 0 0 0 m E° m m 0 0 E c o T n o
U Q / m @ -J �C`I ~ IIJI� ¢ a n ¢ � ¢ ¢ V U LL °i _3 � �i a
lr- m a %
A
C o
dU
Vj rLn �
N
7
z � �
Z O
U
C13
J �
J Z
N C m N
n m
w
WQ -WW m
�o
a

`
a
� � 5`E' f�- - - Qo o N L7
_
7 _ U \ r C i N
m ' (p i?}[V 11 J 4 Q o / y co m N
r U G f pI c, m J -,
cl
m a ...� �,J, p�i7 y � J .�.` -�� `'P/ Q r m ��'- a 7 ,\ � N ] �• a � �° U / ��. W Y
° ¢ °' c
03 U r.
U
U \ ¢ • m • ¢1 �J ,� n 4 OCj • • O bl ILL
d a O •I J () \/ __ }}O
Uo d' Q v U `_ I U c r U /Lp cv
C�r UP
o u
�' l {n N a
CIL /
Q 1 ¢. U csU ' l4 o Z
Q ±rl Oa i a Q
7
ra
ulic'i�
�� `
a co
j
r v m f Q 1, ZL m ` a�' ' U� �� Q f I °> . . a` ei� G� U
° ( Q 1� o _
a J U r U �\ ' �r 4 U� _ 1 o J u� o C'3 0
1 _ \ r✓ i' `
U �p r,l 4 I` •� UO ¢ [t7 S ` D J r 1i �' W \ U) d Z
J
n _ 4r N m r 4
cj
CIO c
� r t 4 � 1 _ .._ q "L O
emu < 0 � Jq O� ` l p co �
cl
Mi
J 0 m Q l t- rb m U
g ¢ F m ¢ ¢
~! O spa N 3` Q Q OCi
8rr0 fl U .� a �i j ¢ C ,/ m a f'
co
m �m ¢ J\ C1 ~ evb U N d n
O L n 4 C k N �r - J �° / o p G
4 U \ C ¢ V J c7 n p Q i pj i G 4
4 c! 11 \�,/ Q 4 / O
f] 1
1, D Q Y Q U ��' tv 1pj 4 U Q Ur U. � q
Ej
O
Q
I. � U' i p O � � � O y �O , \ � p � �} I �h• m m O N N Gyl d to
(1 J - •\41
aa p o Nn NV of O iQ .c i2 E X o Zw C o
q - J y °�'OmZ•�
m
�� (.j p I
2 ' Q C u1 o Y 0 0 N 0 d O cl vo O 3 w p m o 0 lY , q o LD O Y- m U J P m ma O m
CV �• { N a m P r a� r N .N °a mE ��`o ,4 yU N
'O
y is n c m ¢ U • M o m cn z3 a N E E f° c o m m `a a s =° �. X
P Q •�` N Q C C O m LL u
a00 � J U ¢ U 4¢ U p} ti o Q /t`' `\ �. G '� E E E O o Q O a an
l U a. 4 J �' a /n c o 0 0 >, �, N n, T m , m- n° �$ m O U= o
U p a . +t U u 1c} �. ca m EEu, o00 ap °p m
ri U Q 3� N O
'0.0 N Co O 9 ro @ (p o$ v m
l 1 m o 0 N c6 N �, N Cil N N
Q�v.1�o ,t CO 11p p (n cn m cn j c o o� m sPe Q @ a a vi rc
p t a 0 C7 O rn to M o y 3 o za s ^o8 ra
° Q Q' Z- �f Q4 �� • m a n
0 , q () [Q -O [I] — .y C C C rn to d3 O O [0 O
o inY m a U @ a a o. `9 > M m Q m J 3ta 3
O - - '� _ (3 J Q `mid ¢ W �•. 'd ana6
-�• o o e, ` a6- a ¢¢¢¢�J�����
e " •O J ` ••W ry c t U Z N N w N� m_ �F
' P �' ` o �n ¢mmUVq o x° E ° u'
' ''` O{ 4 d m U� ¢ Q OL a aJ J 2'

n l
.�� J O J J III OO C14 i�
1 I I > �f`. N
t,�; ii U J a
U �y a
w a a s �f3
` Ld Q
cx
Ia
ate. \° Qa� w � Q
A I °J Q
} U N cq
a a iL
Q
co
CL < \ 3 1 d v -1 l u
a m a
CIL
c
L a 3
■ U e o a � o
a °' o N o rz
•� Q � d
CL ar LL z O
cc
r
f 1
4--' C N
c`' m sa � f• a C) ¢ p s p
m
ct
LU
o� m
5 \ U N ' j �JN n • �_ N Cj
Q ` �� '� p J U I Y• i { C9 J m J ¢ d Op ¢ J C(4 LL (\I
CL Q ' • cv • 11
a a t 4 CL
11
d tr Q i ci , J J 4 + F 1 I \ y (�
U Y m1 m 10 ' i ° o
Q OL , 'U;
-03 d m '�, n d d -1 p U
a P� x
!I -' LaC ti = -• a
L I
�' `.... o �' I �P¢p - �!� _ dQ�� _�` I',\ U Loa �` \� m �-
N i•. •irk r ` m
f� j U 1 Q
Q I O q. d O j N U '¢ ¢ '
41 0 �...
II J ° { d cli m
1 !I V \ v o a Q Q
ITI
• _
CU
't7 O a m -v` •, f [1}
fY j a
EL $
N N Q
0 m
N N w G L d
N CL -Co J J d n R O O p 0 . e
-
F '
y N U1 0 o o O '� n m o C]
p �
�r J o
fO r E N o m% o co N 0 �.
E o c oc r6 0Norco ° 9 J
CL
w °' O m m U
` -
(O E E E c O
DO o° U
N - ]
-
,
E
co .O
Cl) N N N N N fil 01 L °1 N Cil Q7 O C U o m oQ O a ,� - R \ U ' , , / - Q - , •�
C7 UJ ai c ca •>
N h N C 41 LO f0 I s U J
U Q a a a L v 5's '5 +� m m d 3 t `o m ° cNi x %•. N N a• i
o n n n. a�� o� as o o o o . ! _
UZ ¢d d¢¢U V ❑ IlJJJIl �� aMm fl1 a tr r ?i: � sn
'` a p fn
°� ° ¢ Jcv¢¢Eio J o o m o a a0 �� aa
m
C o
d U
N n L
�� Z
N
Z :3
Z O
U
L
3�
J �
NEI �U o ti
0
�=ama
� hsmm
i
N
A

rr N 1 a
� f�l; m Q ~• a � a �.:• 'Y•f U � � m �, // ' U � 1 U`
1 _ N / n a d r
o .' a J N a ` / a. ` "' 1 J - a IN
LL OL
Ll
j ? /
N
ca V tea. �+ .�= -�- o J o CL q \�? c
CL
G +
m
� d
(J / m ci J 77 \ i J li Q O
-- a
J a ,. Q 0 4 db o
m '. U t Q cli CL ci
• -... • ' Q
d n J�ir O 1 (1 �y ` n JY O CL
d •-j U° Aa ¢ J m
„y U t7 U J U 4
l�
if m I� L U ° 'a J r 8U rr� I m' +d ❑
co
a p y a a ❑ : cs n b r Q
p\ cv ¢ J e o ❑ 1 L,� , U 1
eo
a chi 1 �� Er o
' n /' c� 4 n f T❑ ua U d' d m
d
Q itlt 4 N ` Q d ltl O Y c i n. •' Qi U
m ❑ fl4 r n -j t� �` o o U1 6.
o y
J
❑a n f - -• - •u -- • �' u - ` U J + a v a S 8RQ "c„ o N �o�J -- ` Z
cl
m cs ° d m O U a a m
r Q `, � Q� Q � d � � � J J --� J 1+•- ,'.i 111 � J � � W � J � Q' J
in e3
OL
ETl
a ;
J Z R 1 \sV a rhi
°d / �: +1 J r U ia: Q cl
4
r m w , _ - v p
' �j G �, r n U a �� 80l
/ G} t7 Q ¢ J 4 a I p
no 3i CL m
CL
CL
G" Q
4v� U U
l� 0 � � Gg��K �Q
-
0
>�''f
G�a¢ a�
�p� •
o P. O O y o
°o
n
f
`Z<V •/
1
Y
t Ll 5-
d
0 N u�
o y o 0
a
o o R o
r,m
�`
+ 1
'7
II
C) -1 w
O
00
N
f �' i i �.
•
A d
�p
SA
,
(O (O
ILO T E C N
4, o
-m o a a m m o
1 ' ` L' '
t
C
c0 (0 c0 Stl '� C 0 to �
`� m Z 4 °a m °_m
•
�. _ �.
J
O
m 0 0 o o- O
•O
= �o 2 -6
`
C
7 m C
ATN
N 7. T T T N O� m ._.. � m
c c C a 'V)
r y m_; m
C\f
>, (f) Lr-
cc
e sq
CL
C C C C to l0 (U
"Lt -a
m
d
1
O
> a 61 c c
Q
u
-Y ¢
- r
UZ ¢ Qaa°¢' Q, C) °o 't
0p ¢¢¢Q¢ IL��
oeg�o
a
-
0

U
m
i
N
CD
i; v 31�
'10
°
N •
'
N
�V
V
�o r•
y
__....
am
o
m
C
w
�z
"• p
a
Q /
V
�
'8
as
/
Ora
5
:
LL
r >
CJ
N
C E
Q
r
cg1
ID
.
- m
U
N
J
U
7� > J• c `a r o o r CL °a mE mod
-
1S \Y�2 r i �..• [] m Zj� =1let 0 z�Itjfr t;iit�a N ° cn r r o co <o r o N o 00 o a s= n
N E E E m c° M 2D
Q 4 N "� .. 'O 'O N a@ I6 Stl N z v° m
\� \� \ J N • N U S' ❑ C fE6 tcu N N 3 O O O IEC y r fna uo0c
J "j 3\ ){ 7 ~ :3 m c o N 'o E E o 2� m _ 'vr @ o vi d q
�% Co
E m o 05 N.0 @oo 6 mma� o zaIaoa
e if (� 3 i E, O KpE @EEaaLo 333-0 -0 M m
W 4� J J .'.� �7 N %� 'C3Cn 3t.c N.NY-0 -0 'a rt 0 i- r
Q W
N E>m
0 z CV m o
04 o
7 c0 U ❑ wU M N
UO C 0 n a
V15 CL co
3
o� i � �• � E
m co1
c' v /. /i g /•' u
E
v� N \ U v OL 75
I c., 7 m ttiwt3 r . N o rnN
-i / LL
cl
mE
1N ♦ II
CL 0 CL
¢ a E l u
c o�U N
cv
i 1 U i' c,; po E /� W w e l
U' J/ r I/ f/ j/
to s >> a "� f N // N
> , ay �ti
❑ U N ° '' E m
E + m 2� J1, 3 yE o� a f •
N � � �J 7 � �/� / Ali ♦ - } [NS � ? J a 4 / > j �
N U E ?
CID uj
J E / N �� m U O Q 1 y'�Jr R
M CL
M
CN
? 1 O d
ca
%� J ` U /
0 -
0 n 7 G Q
n a o 41
v IJ 3: -f yy E E rf La J N N
°
u
a�r
5 �xNr N
W a m m ^m
�m
a
[J
N
i; v 31�
'10
°
�o r•
y
__....
o
C
w
N X41
F41
V
G1
'8
'�
o�c
00
C:
CO
N
r >
CJ
f
`f
J
cg1
ID
- m
N
J
N
U
�
E
(D
CL
o n � � �
`� a
LL1
Y
A
\
N \ /
•
pO %
—
N
N
D S3
Gl
`
N
t11 ryl N
mo
ZN
v
v a
_/'
E
ao
m m a
@
m'g
C
i
QJ
'
O
3
CNil
N G. Vi r
CL 0
O O
p
7
M. >
b
�a0`t'D�6
�i
Z�iu
•• �_
N
N [Y? 0
fA N
o o LO
}f o
a r
o`r�
o o q o
w Y m m Q°
D.
@
❑
I:
Ll
7� > J• c `a r o o r CL °a mE mod
-
1S \Y�2 r i �..• [] m Zj� =1let 0 z�Itjfr t;iit�a N ° cn r r o co <o r o N o 00 o a s= n
N E E E m c° M 2D
Q 4 N "� .. 'O 'O N a@ I6 Stl N z v° m
\� \� \ J N • N U S' ❑ C fE6 tcu N N 3 O O O IEC y r fna uo0c
J "j 3\ ){ 7 ~ :3 m c o N 'o E E o 2� m _ 'vr @ o vi d q
�% Co
E m o 05 N.0 @oo 6 mma� o zaIaoa
e if (� 3 i E, O KpE @EEaaLo 333-0 -0 M m
W 4� J J .'.� �7 N %� 'C3Cn 3t.c N.NY-0 -0 'a rt 0 i- r
Q W
N E>m
0 z CV m o
04 o
7 c0 U ❑ wU M N
UO C 0 n a
V15 CL co
3
o� i � �• � E
m co1
c' v /. /i g /•' u
E
v� N \ U v OL 75
I c., 7 m ttiwt3 r . N o rnN
-i / LL
cl
mE
1N ♦ II
CL 0 CL
¢ a E l u
c o�U N
cv
i 1 U i' c,; po E /� W w e l
U' J/ r I/ f/ j/
to s >> a "� f N // N
> , ay �ti
❑ U N ° '' E m
E + m 2� J1, 3 yE o� a f •
N � � �J 7 � �/� / Ali ♦ - } [NS � ? J a 4 / > j �
N U E ?
CID uj
J E / N �� m U O Q 1 y'�Jr R
M CL
M
CN
? 1 O d
ca
%� J ` U /
0 -
0 n 7 G Q
n a o 41
v IJ 3: -f yy E E rf La J N N
°
u
a�r
5 �xNr N
W a m m ^m
�m
a
[J

�.
\�(/\� % ;4% v J�3 7 d] ' v S�� f �.00 ��A fa r C i N
y Q m U E j F T' d �G� ? 01 / co m
(} > N E 7y U N I O
N Y n tv N / LU
s J O ' E 1 �,� ' ! aJ� Lu
m I w � �� 4� N U U U
CIA C, t? O � � �� N li � � �_ Qry � !n N O
SSE 5` a �'— U .o C
E v E o Y
oc
Li 0
� O
4 E 'i J N 'r f 'J E 1'
� '11 ��' c3j, III p GN z�A` .Y ~ Q�
�\ x m N
Q O ! II N
of �
o r ca
co
¢ r�
I a >+
U' O�G p / I I p
3: 11 U U 5 o
N
�w m ii
E E Il Q a 8el, on A / z Z o
In
WA
E 3
CL N a
U Q a ° d rJ a V 7
Q C W Q �f ��% N 1 03
LO
to
W y 3 �S�` 1 c r / E.
Qei m • c i E �, N E N ❑ \
Cl
a°
�r Gl
-3' m
cNi ` O v 3 3 O
a d •• e v 1 J a
/ 0 N 0 E rn N N�
¢ [C E ° `�J f a n� y awi an
¢ ui vi o° y a 0.9
App N V C ' = o • 2U(bM U m o� Nma Q)ao.awNoNw
J E j c O,. o a o O o off° ul m a o C
O a us"\ r Qc O- N � 0 E o 0o coo Ec° i oY N N
° mE3aa
0 a F
n ¢ Q ` N O # @ d N N (O (D N" E E E E v07 C o m
O I A t6 COil 0 0
�• a i7 i G C C G uj O a �� Vmoa a
•° o \ 14 �0 co •O G O O y f�l1 N A O ?, 7. T `h m T 67 = �°
�.....��' R E C 0 fV N N O ?. -O 'p •O -O �1 •:. a.2
_ a ' Q ' !l N to N T T T •p E G C G G G m �.-
Q m N 6] LOG > n, o, m c N +� m m
I 9 G N w N% IU % N N I!% 10, V1 G c� -°,
'ci (� I a 0 N m 0 7 ° f17 W a m m m
OL d� RZ � �`" 4 m 0 ca N a t6 cll N O O O �' al Ul 67 Cil N 47 E o U o E n u, a L>:1 i'i1 E'i a m w E
pvi 0) mE E E E 3 3 3 3a s Za o oa .
! �i •- !!� c c t4 m m 0 0 0 o m
I1� • �Q / i / a ` U cv n a c m c c
a Q t o o ro o O y v�
0 Q U❑ ❑LLJJ
z #O mo�mU� 04
'k
R n p p Q V3EE�E 7�o
a ¢am0UU L o� J E
N
o �
I�
E

ki
• 4
r1
A'
yf �F
ti
r }' •4 - r
i ml1
�LL
1 ?F
S
F4 13' i M1�' -• q` " '�l
r 7.,� � r'' 'r •l�i�, Taff
q k i
I � 1
"77
MPS
t4�.*
444 1'�ti
44'
� y 7
tip .
U ooa
01N, I
i CO o o o O? z u~i�
i l O "O foA 7 ° a
r— en cn s ca `i 1 r o 3 o Q7 -j 'o 2 CL
r: {IL�o
• , FF n' ri o' ■ U7 �na�
1
Q
WIN
"R�i -i�•Ck , F' 1)r ,'ice : 's +r w��, . L *, �✓ �l 1 * T .e�t� y
hr
Lf
lk
I Ilk
� . ��,� . t' * t ♦ 7`,'�1, � ...b� l � y' "`•r \�' yam: , ��
,t:�.�, r.�r�� .y;r '! .t , .'� \�` _ ! � +Ti \�•�?� 'fie' .� � �� �?.a i� �•�,
..'f .� � h�s� st I f ✓fF��..i 'f -.'. .`.\ - v {• 1 � � Y ' i_ , � � � � " `� � � � �.
,:. i)1:.. ��- ;i ����t, • -tom � , �
fr' + �: �• E X41' t :i� "t ,
r,
t
o 3 .�
C o
4) U
0 n
O V
o
4} Z
N
� � C
z U
0
m
O
J
o
VJ o
ou = �
a
B
_
4_ '
a
i W
C
A O 7 Z
`a
N
M
11 i7
`-ILL r:
.♦
in
p
7
0
U� ,�55
CK
117 iK —
CL s
Q. LA
} m O °6
C1 C1
# G C
C
L
(tiU
E
LCIL
❑
a
_
LL
U ooa
01N, I
i CO o o o O? z u~i�
i l O "O foA 7 ° a
r— en cn s ca `i 1 r o 3 o Q7 -j 'o 2 CL
r: {IL�o
• , FF n' ri o' ■ U7 �na�
1
Q
WIN
"R�i -i�•Ck , F' 1)r ,'ice : 's +r w��, . L *, �✓ �l 1 * T .e�t� y
hr
Lf
lk
I Ilk
� . ��,� . t' * t ♦ 7`,'�1, � ...b� l � y' "`•r \�' yam: , ��
,t:�.�, r.�r�� .y;r '! .t , .'� \�` _ ! � +Ti \�•�?� 'fie' .� � �� �?.a i� �•�,
..'f .� � h�s� st I f ✓fF��..i 'f -.'. .`.\ - v {• 1 � � Y ' i_ , � � � � " `� � � � �.
,:. i)1:.. ��- ;i ����t, • -tom � , �
fr' + �: �• E X41' t :i� "t ,
r,
t
o 3 .�
C o
4) U
0 n
O V
o
4} Z
N
� � C
z U
0
m
O
J
o
VJ o
ou = �
a
B

ekV f
�
°000
•�
�y
Y
1
r
jy
1: MX i� ,!t w Y` + ` � ♦ L �' LL � ■ M .' la �•�ti
:. ,�- ".sr tic t�..t 'L� _�' 4,`�, ��� ��t t�r� �•,, tt � ;S'�.� lo��
� j `LIJ.. � • ',t4 _. 4 •..w_ s. _ FR 1. `t
z . �.. -� , i� rip r• T+ T � _ ��
I�S3,p`,'k Y�SyI,( 5y °{ � }- -t \ 1 I � +�xn's� r ! �Q/� � `• •` �� , AF= '
y' :a u��s ` - ►F', -i. ��.:, s ���w.t� ` � - - T Ask','
`'' ^�t tw i ff�w `�4�. • _ _ t� �G �` ,.,\ is i�51 � � ¢ 4 •! �; G r,1
'? T'S .S j�., i. , f r }I.,` • � ., ,� � •2M.4, M1 i�i � r; r S � r 5 � � � � - -
t > { Ar 'L^r ,1 `,'. ! y ; \w ��.� ��,t `41: , 4 �• . 'tLi` �.�.- _
�+ t'; r�P„� r ';,4sA ti`` '��?:� ;lax �. `• to-+;
!� fit• �'`'�r' �`` � •'� f IL'• >'•• +• r ''f �Y �
sy' � � . , •;..fie p� �` ti rF .1
;;11ry° r
dt
17 WA4
t• �i •� Y irj � {art ��� �iS T Y.T j
�'
�{ is ,r {. s .O ,l �,r`• -r:' � -..
sf
co
Ok
?e
�F y
i'
j
+i� _� 'CR�r fir.) /r ��! - •. .rf, J: .( /� f
�.•. -1i'- - - r ,' � � =gym 4 � �� � y '��►w _ ,,
i�
o o
o r
O N H M
� � Y
O
EL
L
CL Q o u
O �
� C O
� U
N Y/
� � 3
a
Z U
J
� o
4
8g �
�e 8
r/ismm �
o�
0
a
0
°000
•�
CC�
C Eq
w ca
me a
L' w QJ
V1
E H c m• ° ° z•
,_ t_ C
2 ao °as
_ E7] C
X N
!L a
o c m
G7
9a °nH 38
2•�
co a O o o? Z
m
tnu N. s9 a
�s�ZLL
O
y wa
U •��—
CUBA
1
Q
IQ
>
pao2
o o
o r
O N H M
� � Y
O
EL
L
CL Q o u
O �
� C O
� U
N Y/
� � 3
a
Z U
J
� o
4
8g �
�e 8
r/ismm �
o�
0
a
0

0
i Jai ti !
4", N-4
-JOY I f
Ike
AIO
lid, 1;l
_01
` I "
*44Y
Ti
JP 0'
J.4
It
VW
X T,
I
7 f
C,4
fn
'm I?
V,
I I rvl%
4or
rl I- . .
44
C)
4f
00 (a
� U J IL
ui
10 2
to
W CL
E E co
C' 2_9 m o m a E 12 A
CY)
0 L
C 0
J. _g
IL
co o o o o
�iGt OC C14.
a m
41
JTX uo S
LU
4Z -
Ar
pr
ry) ti
.41
ilc
:3
0
M
>, r-
O L)
0
z
04
44
z
H
I �

' t .• I `i t a i:R� rdpr 7 4 � ter. ,i ', /v - •. t [
! c i:5 \ s`;- ,�•rt'�i 5d"�.. S� �!t � [ty '� S v�YRS � �� ,\ �ti' � - i- '`��,!' .'_y +r -��. } i! � ;„�i ..
S[ _� }` ,/.-,tf•Irr�%' � r4 + +- -.f' r ,,�• �r-'.+i .� � `" '� 'DJ4Ay '. /F f' fF `J Yya.S 5 r
t{ t'1�f .rr. s�'.k �c,,'L •+ -;� yn, - f,l�rS; Y.r'� '� rr5 'r.
r. ! yr�:'" •F•'i.'' ., 100 1 � +- -drl�' .•ri i - - -t.
¢f� 'r•i
� k ;E ✓ -X, r� h {i ',' �y,�' ' a 4: yet r i, 1 �yF d �r•'r - �. �, 'Itir
�r
F i�,4 4 Y'i .. ' 5'_�� i' Z,, �� �i. �� � J ��• %y' v� yt ',.� , ;f�YY, \Y�:..S ,r�,,4`4.•} "A" _ .\
V t d . yyp .r _ :� /'r S�6Y •d' , �. ;5 ,) rf
�"�'� J _ +�l��st �Kr � S 'j .� .�•,C 4 •�i_ad ,, �.., +�� ��{ � �. -ra'f �M ?. .�� /' Irj
i
�t l ♦ r (i, _ , \ Y .... S S �• r y, r ak Sr./ 7{"r `
- ¢� *�..�'��r r+ �' ��'��• '�'' �•r +.t .�- Tai �#:I r' �s.r ��`v! ,rryl: �
y _ f 'ti.17. - ��- - Ii'•L' .� .i 'Fc�. � �i -��. 5, - +S r r, � Y.�t •r f �'
r. r � {' "�y._r,.�,,'pr: �� r F rr r'`. r' i _ 7• t{'�, rn f��i�rs r.' r :"y� �i:i4 ,.i' ' ��t { r,[ � ;�/ r ,'if ; 'f,'� ST� �. >•�yj •y
}�+��++(v4r. �r t �.t -�. �j�� _ � /... -a ,� 1 'J _fi � %,.,,.�� ✓. �, 1 :�: ✓r - ! a: ";�� r,�~ i ' ��i •r".,�'
r S A!'," ' ., ��kf f...;�. � ��\\ � - qJ! '►` '�.�: s- .a5!. r�. y, �t r+ , it r':�1 4• i, t!t' -'�,:
;, !'• ✓. � -- rrJiYf• %ai ���` . +tea' if r• r. .� ••�.� i� ` � Y.�If `'�. fir•. _
.,;6. `�f14� �5• ! Sf+f�i! r ,. .;/ �r ^rr y -r ,T t. :.s. .�� $�.• � �', �J� _ r /' Ry'': _ ° _ ,
,,4 � :'�"I�'. • /�� I �* • 4 - f � i ��' i Jr 5 �, r . f, i {r � - � j I `'! ,i `'- ° , '� - r •P �,• •5 `. f - ,
JF .�f '[, •�. r ������ �,r #',;�� �t, •r+.! •Y, f(/ �, •I. �i. ! .r r. ,�f= ,Iys�j \\ /y��
't!. {.' +� }ii. . ' dr - cT i. - '*,' 2- •. f l y,,�. ,�6 'y �• M 4f: `� Y►; \ W
'4. '�rl �J� �:� sf..' .YI �� /.� '* .�ir -i C',�r... `�'�. .r. ' .t:': rn- "� m m [ �V _'1!•''��. `4 r:` - 4 _ � 4t' vJ '\
.1 ,i�1 1Sr `+']: it,f' - 't,:�; 'i �f1(�S.R i' �'>' e' }` h. } ".p ., er :t'.flr ire k •..� , :6 r ' -w..
rteF
�. ll:. .,� `P' Z � �� .,S{�j[ r:.,�i+ .-' py1�' , �� r j; :�'� y I y ;2',k �'l�� „� ,. {� F �% ,�"� - �;`t `fiA •E *,'�- � �, + ..,ry l
r T t ` t'i ri •4' • N`j , r �': �:�i i „� 7 t+ �{ , �w < c
! 'Y.. �z+ Str •� - '�','lA a {. t i. ��'��y' e. {tee r. -� J I�r �. 'y .S- ,s ♦SP`- .. 'd 7- �� -� _ a �a�. ����rr��,,''yy+�,'''Q Si.�t'7 i j
i•�.k-i,� _,��i� \.�.:rtir� � � �; , \�- �: ,, •%'.r_ @l�,;�¢ .r. �~ r? ='l5�. f.:! � �h. �' "!� % r _ .:�' - ''J,t. 'ri•'���'k %y
:r• '1! ,'!i,',f � .!• ;I �"!" '" r .T I ',i t�d4 ;. •'�. .� e "t 'F/y" - "'.�y � ",P ? -i' L'.t �3�t'`. � I ,
'�FF;'iS i,��? y-i 3 , ; � _ 1t�- ' � 1 't " / A{{tt � ! • r iir ',' {' ��T, � F -; 1 ;� s _ y -' $ • ':!�i y •r`� : 4 � ' .? i , '•r r �'! l! ti i : � ' ` r .t i c � ,Ti'! � l � F►!� • . r. r ••. . t �' Y �V s i ,f' . � �' ��� i ,'F .E ` , y,' ( /t i } F n '♦ ; r ' - i>. , �\.y�', � rt �f f4,{Tl�xri h Lye t_.r {' v r 3 r � � �' 'r•_ ` �f" '� " '; • [r • �k' >Y , 11., �r!e`w•e . ; • ,! `r i . ` r.1 f(. 'r/ "i� ,_, ?� f . �• :: >} + r . r j .� 3 �_ Cc: f N-ie.`e rs
v
cm ap� :
,
i= -
' I �•`'r, i . +(. r #,.` S_. �. m <<'i. III'
, r' f•- s/ ( :� a'��r - { ". ,, �•IW _ ! i
�'• , lr 1 •• '.. _ ' lS v y.;t r, * -' y� {���r `-• ' j, \ ,1i1 1
/_rPr 5. -h r�, ♦e ,r y!• 'r ,r �.r•'� - "K;' "��
'+. I T ,�4r) ,)t`. o••y fr" ,ild A' t #' ;, �r#'..':'t k!'•,W,..,,1 `•-% 4' -t .d ✓_..'r ';`,tj''f',' �/ �" d-: {\ i' la
im
I J 'U�r�iL\ , "r#q,{y '' " °j} l'" �- t'i- 1�' °•� V 'ti �- I 'E='y -'•t rftt> _ f ! - �� td: ;,t.
vJ . ,ir'f -,�ti a t! i• m �/' fyA',. I;3{ I'J f..�, M�, .S.F �►r.� �Mti r'. ..,
' I ��+�yy, i• r�i �. ^� ,r.' z '� �' "] lls►�t (�'y r•,nl, �° �`` � i j��, � �_'t' r '\ `._ j+ r i _
� ` t'7! " �. i� �. � 5 w r" T F�.� �: ,i r�, i .i /� �'` � S SS r i . R - + r,�, ��r �-- , .� � 4' ti r �,� • •
,
I. I' � .i.`'r. � S. 1�`r�1 :� '� l' '� :� Ate, ! '� '•T �Sair''7-,�,�r,� ♦ �' .y�i' i � �� �, �. � \ �.. Y�, y ��. / � •, ,
' i 1 - T i' .•1 'I - .! rt .. .�� h 1 i�+-I S S! i �g� l 1-�- Tx: v�•� is �'
•Si5 i . Fri �, � r. i_ � ~. r ", t �W �. $ f i. ] , i 1r' "`w.' L[„ '�•. •� ti y!w %i' '`'�r T'; � � . �� �. 1 � S '� � .� .. e r
y !Y « \j ;;�y "1 { 1 `:4 �,Y(+.t ,'� T: 1� t ,,,`. ; iC. f, t ;' -: •', ,..2�i•Y '�i �St ' �. i; L' _ 9Z- , •rr. . .
l, r v ``• �; li:A t F. t 7 �� 2 ritL, /t / ak it.
-r G 1 '! 'i *,i'� ��. r ./ ,1 /f. ra K• r/�Y ,x •i� ,.r/ . �. _! ,l J DD i4• _ .ry\
-I'7 [y \- ; %t ,r -y ,3rr ,tsfe+ :s.1. '� 7; rrP�. '`s �'� iYu� - r -d. fi., X, %t• ,R r '.I ;. "" 1t�_+ � _�t. L__ \� �sP �r�✓ .�.
-a'
�5}��YrE'e P'� i'�.; • r b ,�1, ak.�`•, ,yy." i �.�' \ . �� ;0 r
,V�� r, -�. i «i•. ...."J i,li" l ,. •, G•vr�• i *,./ i•k: -{< N>t- '`V'�f -i �'y.i .i J ', �'1 r'�} i ►> . ,MrF.r ,r' ,s ; ►°T;iA',ye -rr i� ISj, y.r` J,'k5' Cf G'p'f.l _ r•
q > : k � r r l L �. r ?i ` ti : I f_ r'• i t '— L- ` t i•• , k� L �. _ N
• LL , - a � J r +, {'. i',it�.'4i', %�. L' .! -fir rS4� '.[ f . %I,� J'r _ ; LL a 1+. ,' �r ._ I .. VL
tFi�! ,. .c5�``'2''�6 „�; {!�{ �� 5+;` S3bif4LT`?'' F>� � 1!s�' 1 s. 1 � • �„' , , r � .1 f r r`j �yIf: ' �; � "'i s .. F � i
LO lr \04'
a „ / � " ! > :`•� �6� i- ;- .Y- .�Js�. Lv• � , - $��.'• � � ti r. �" alt j ' r� L'�jr� I'\ ! t'1
"K[,.'' '• 1 -, :fir _ „i +� r� \ �� -t :.• ! r� i Ste. :i` ..:k '.;�i,i� j �'r /(y�.�.., }� , \ ?S 1.� .1 �� f r.i ;I
[ p \ ;I sr _ i yr �` Irr ��'°,r�.E•r t>�'��'r: 1►•:- _ �.,i� �r.' � +.�•�r. r'7a5. :�4't ,� \�'�•.i• �.�" r'Y ,�4t =. �� Yr{'
�I
a
I •1- •r } r 1. Pi+ ' t1 �! r� �.TLFjrI to r. ,l• "�
s �s r � ! 11s•: �' Sk •rtt v !.. > 5 .M �,�.. r �• ,',� I.. � ; i ��' ` (6 � h � z
r�w
Orr
�1 r
-':�� 3,•,. t•✓, . =h1 i rt ":-s •. rte' 1` :'� � ": A +t�
10
��Kb �f�
�
n • '
� j ^� r�;f•' rfr�,ij;) Y �. . +rte .: � i i����•' r ;4�,. �; -, •f>•ti �, ,, - A.1
it
• ; 'r � 4 ~- .d�i!' �. �, ,�.. Lam•'
`� �� �� ;'�� ll.L •�• LPL ��_ ,�, , . t � `.• � - ,*
* L =r• AW
O O H
o
Y
L
L m �y
a D o i�
O �
C O
J (u
O � L
U O
m Z
70 � C
� � O
Z U
O L O
C (� a
O
J
J
d �
zz a"
5
z c
0

LAX-2 ell
ff. I I 2j
IR ' ]
�• f; {titw�r�J'�+ `S . ;r.,. �,k . r,�, �e� • �7
dLi C.
S�jf�' t' ►y► �' I{ y�p�+ `�4t�'. w
�'
2 {`�- C >tir• �+ - !'•4•'. 'ir -i, IyHr.'. .:•Ati 1w
rV •�^
r�:l..�r � •.i'' kL , �V7r' Y � }r��� J r i t �`•��''I1�9RR''FF �� r � 'rJ �. �, 1f'Ar }!� . - �, ta_d. '�(,..f ;�✓y]E� d !� Q LL
}
, xs� _c�' .S�' y`�. �?'f r -. ��, y�.t �+'��r'.�fi�J�'i*,�yLi�1 � �T, `� }•
i - IlGiJ. ' �/ Yi•o7,� I ii.7 Ji r• ) ♦ - a C ��
4-C err '6
y
r
y� 00
•� .�,_�., �a:iAei�'�t•+. 'r•.i +- ifi.►, -. � 1 '- .}<7�',�3�;- p-` �'�4- �. � �'e. �, '� •• f e�j.' � risy,. .:.Y
"11-,��€ it A4 5ftml. •Slx -_ `S 4 Swo fly r�.3 �•'�) ti: 4 r �s'•k /i �r .r ( :i- �' X oil
24`�<- :��- L�'4`U'� -•E:+ y►��11 =3rd '� � O' ' � � ,•e r � *��,t`i� ,• � � ± � fr
,r , f`ti i `ss4 {: /. { r 4 f �A�rr }+t7Fr`�pfy 1'£YS• i "r'; ;4 Ile
i<.. ' (r �. r •,e ;' <. - R i - �! i r i 'r !y'' • i +y} . `� / 9rs,•�• t 1
#. / �• ,•_ �• m .f�� t P r'r.4d�. jr, %•�r .l „�,� ++ �7 .�'kJ�f �{�', ,z$ �.. •� !. •.�
y ,4 In „� Y.�w > r `i; •1' y.i: ' • ♦' O'
LL
j .•'�\ y�1.:- U •+ fir, t J.{ ! r f / 'i• ti /`
YVj. �� 'J7i, ;J � , r•. � �.- if � � T`fi' : f! � 4 .` �.c ��R,'•. ti . r r. �,.��, F w�f ,•
I g1.�' � �, � •• • •+� e�4�. p� r �sF' i• A;ti ! � ..� J rf t;:- k, � -� •�, � "�s•',
:`° �•. �.iC 't (D r�^ F �', S- ".��fJ Y,�'. �9 {��.�� +} '� 7 / J ' r -',�li - f*``�r `•��� j. �.. T 9 -'
IbP
1y . • t . {� r. �
Lj— vJ i e �,. .c y
, E n .!fj
�•. ,ill VJ • ^f -, -ry :�yf `� t �7. /'Y I fFGi s WJW
% .,�( �;: � /g (
� b� - {I� •� _•._'+'a!V,d� ,f i'r
C� I 4, .Y• ~ _ %`, 2 Sf ✓;� i i,,� J�,Fl - - ,r i JY i t rom
'r .f sr � yt� s�',2`�'. 1�•"#'L �r -- r, r{�; -115 •r •�2`:� �' �p'� '.i:; '�; J��Ay' ^. i R' �✓
fr ' 3S r� +; ik �l•'.t,,l�S; &' s TJ: °, 7r�%:!� �> r Fr' �. ri . ��
t
2'o r r nY s J `i v &_, t 1' ;pf 4, f.• ; f .• t
i j•. ,y •l � <: � . b•F�„f�rti !/.;•� ll� r
'}f f t. � . ' �'Sy't'- 'i r '• �S. { . . g;..•
ri,
.�,3, _ ''tt�'�. ' � � � 2, l,�' � s', s �' J',l i�•�; /..('�/;v► t - � � r-0 j ;i'�
"� '' ��'��. ��: -, ,,t; +, �f �'.� ys ' 4 �k't? �'k•,F , ?,' �rtii J;ti� r -'S � 3,
„Cye �,� 1. �� J v `� )� T (+ F � s'• ., �}
�:S.I ,tY ��tl.ni• i \� F.+ ( � 4' �'�q" r i/' {� is �. r�'4 � y e 1� }.
y /
��•. 4 K
r
�+ rS
'['y�,,�♦ f, U
4
M LUL ri
� y kk T• s
/ L
hot
t
ti -� Y �-. �, a '.f. •i .0 �C, N 2• €tea'
,vas. >• •,�� � .} , - '34.,( I~ C C (6 1 co`n
f ¢Jti�l r' %- °�•' -, 'r' ' ,. `�.y,1 •�r, s�`'� it * _ 'X oLL' �,��
.(:':.f,`s .4 }: �` �:y ' �t r. -'r ys' _I,iIC�'- ''• nt- .� n o-- `
v 7.`►#%F- �a+7'',r >� �/ 6
r�rr•-•.� !pp .� ny • y'�ij YJ' i�°
LL
Y ' ' - i�•'2 / z _ fn M � i �E _a oa
.., >• t 1 3 - -1:' .� o m r `a a
� ~��J ,�t��� � „•. � . � � � t-
r ���✓" •• r'5k n, -J ya �r .� f w i �f f. r iii +L+ � d � � m � � � N � o m u e E r
`i�` {�_ .y-�F.v;t- :' {,(iFt ?7!`r +r "i.:�,I4'x ;- (d (0 �(D (4 �- N
T'• i ,lf �" +ice ,+ r. �t�' F>'t �'e' O C C •� C C 7 'O a
Jr-rr. ,,f !� ��•�� ,: i fYr� r, >'rr fk.J: f� - .�r� rf.{ m O O •� Q O ? z H� °SFOa
( U n
U U U V QS C Cv anu ao
.gip K S' ,p'AA�i 1 STS�T y ..'JW r •ji. j Q �' L O p (V m 3 o c
' ?, }'i -,�'r .�'f +.l•� -. �. ,� - ,'j��er s1r, ',� .! r .'� 1f'z• k � l �• � 'a 'C C � � � C .�
• �-. ~.ti+tir • �' �. ��+ : r .Ss }`'�.' ,/.- !�� ��� t • , i f O '� '� (SY •_ '� � (33 � p o ~ p
�` '� �+.•yk "i. •�y.Rrt��F�r t re •�tp/k���• /') �3''` a- s. J ... � _ o � a
'�� _]�y_ �� 17c �,Jy�f�y�[ 5 ••�'�' +l, ;f 1 � 1. 1 ��. ' � {''`JY• 11rII� {1II {��,��q+� 1 11 I{ � m ° p o
4 '.- � �. �''•- T .! f -�.,!/ L� �},�. i � ! . W� �� 4 �' CfT � `�.I I � ■ I I in � n 6
li- 'SS \: {- C J.f�Si'A/•'..r�'i -0i k.tY.._i 'i'� .. ' A -.' �,� •:.:!. .. i = _
3AO C
c O
J Q) (c0
i U
o (a C
U a
W Z
N �
� � O
Z U
J
It E
flu 1 z
U
5 * �
m N N E
3
s
a
°o
a
4
a

RE
lot
f
IkE 17 41
I.x
-Al
110
LL
Wlkk
I q 10L
LL.
A,� I
t-,Aj C
Y�
ODA;%
X,
U-
U_
IT S
5
pt
6 q'�'j A4"
f 6,
-77
Q
4
74
4! Z.0
ARM is �
nj
A( itC4
YJ
Alov: Out %,"AM
4F,- tw_
IL
r�,r.�f.�r • � 'r••,.� i�AL"1•'' „t _r y!�',g ••i1Fi; fit\ .2F�`r r - -y,: _' >3.�ti` try
_K�
allv� I"
B
Of
150. it'll
F4 C\1
LL LL
.,- rj�
4, 4
&A Jt
, imill��
jt
, wt
7N
0)0-
C Iz —
CML
AtIf (n
1, CO
A
CO
10 fu
w
0 - >
i`. licit 3 m ix,-4r! e Y r -0 -0
11 pill
D
0 LT
L) ;P
A# Bull - a�oo
O 'Ca
v
.6
2
ca
zC)
:3
Z LO)
O
2e
0 0
_j
I p E
LL
8U z
ONN
Wei PICK
r p-
O

1 1 �x -71 7� -1
,
ail '
Y
CI
i�
(hr
♦ 1 ��Jy]M�r.:
4
f is
h-
i ti
NJ! r t
r ' L
rf�
Q)
4
Idle
1,
h
T'
LL
B
r
r f
y' [
pill
,:
• fl
I y '
to r F >, s
LL
LL
y
r
ti �a • v
�v- <4
t
J S�Y� - s5�• � -. !
rat,; •�� .P' {.� -- -`- �lA� -- � :r •zrr+— �- �� r"a LY's`'���`�s � T..'
�;' �- � •ice. ��.• ;,i�` '1`. ��' j ; � �'�. �'� �����4 �� � it •` r.
. ! lily t� .4 ^' T. _w'} Y � �Y Y;F•�'�;' t�� s.s_
s N S
LL
i 4 .' *' ; `� a j 61 y U � A-
1 00
CN
[ -'!�� �. J� _ - �. � �', jt - ,, �' �,. r i�, la tea.• i'{ � 4�i�• �
%`}4r.0 ; r�"�*i_ -'{� �' X7"1. ��a}`{ F�lr` s1�J'il� 'r _1�•y -
'•de:r -t � •,- -: r Y � �tj. ,Qr
JA
pi' FI { �� � } � i%• �' ii � f M 4 -� I I [ ! 1 � �, s 5 i i ,�,, .,i
♦� r� {i` L�15� 1 •.mss ��• �•� ��' � y dfi •�'. �•k�1�7 t t. _�:;F �j':+ r I t' Y {.
`a ,
F •' 1 0 0 )—
J
r j .• a- i_
aJ,
ti
is
i
i�rAW r.
xv
11 4 t
.J
[tv
' M
o�
2.�
awmc
C a- rr�
o
n-
ma good
c m 3
{n C
c
•,V
.
,��i � 1 LL
N Lo (a cU L (p E
ail '
Y
CI
i�
(hr
♦ 1 ��Jy]M�r.:
4
f is
h-
i ti
NJ! r t
r ' L
rf�
Q)
4
Idle
1,
h
T'
LL
B
r
r f
y' [
pill
,:
• fl
I y '
to r F >, s
LL
LL
y
r
ti �a • v
�v- <4
t
J S�Y� - s5�• � -. !
rat,; •�� .P' {.� -- -`- �lA� -- � :r •zrr+— �- �� r"a LY's`'���`�s � T..'
�;' �- � •ice. ��.• ;,i�` '1`. ��' j ; � �'�. �'� �����4 �� � it •` r.
. ! lily t� .4 ^' T. _w'} Y � �Y Y;F•�'�;' t�� s.s_
s N S
LL
i 4 .' *' ; `� a j 61 y U � A-
1 00
CN
[ -'!�� �. J� _ - �. � �', jt - ,, �' �,. r i�, la tea.• i'{ � 4�i�• �
%`}4r.0 ; r�"�*i_ -'{� �' X7"1. ��a}`{ F�lr` s1�J'il� 'r _1�•y -
'•de:r -t � •,- -: r Y � �tj. ,Qr
JA
pi' FI { �� � } � i%• �' ii � f M 4 -� I I [ ! 1 � �, s 5 i i ,�,, .,i
♦� r� {i` L�15� 1 •.mss ��• �•� ��' � y dfi •�'. �•k�1�7 t t. _�:;F �j':+ r I t' Y {.
`a ,
F •' 1 0 0 )—
J
r j .• a- i_
aJ,
ti
is
i
i�rAW r.
xv
11 4 t
.J
0 3 -_
cc C 0
J d (0
Q� U
C L -C
0 {ry tf
O
U
Z
N � �
0
io Z U
L ()
x
C) 0
J
5 zZN� m
.
W rn cl 02 m 12 e
o�
o�
2.�
awmc
C a- rr�
o
n-
ma good
c m 3
{n C
c
m
U)
LL v!
W
N Lo (a cU L (p E
o
0 C C C C N 2:3
- ,' 8
�E8
m O D 0 0? z
p cr �a o
D U CS U Q}
O U
C
m n°n
pu
i N (� C N Mn C+�+
'L V •L Mn M
co
U
ea �mElW
h A nT
O�wa
naE
0 3 -_
cc C 0
J d (0
Q� U
C L -C
0 {ry tf
O
U
Z
N � �
0
io Z U
L ()
x
C) 0
J
5 zZN� m
.
W rn cl 02 m 12 e
o�

7
NNWy
A
' J
r -�• � �t 1 �ln: 7..
T'
f
ly
/
.k f .
0 o h
♦ �.. t3. � `q z.' "�',�,` .. � -�S �S,r r - -�s r � �Y F� � � N Y M
f, f , yr ,w�s`�i r`f 1, t i� f � ty' "i F" tt r • }sit, 1 ( 4 tby r co m
LLJ
kyr. �it1 •k I t jr*�R ,R a�i �is 1 r�'.16e' �f ''�� -:' L
f f ♦ 1r• °•, y }�Jr� .y(: • - ^( Y-ilT fl, 3^�Jk• �f -Lc i 1 +- U or
.! ti a3�`7J, -1 'i!' �dr.`ir7 •' _ 5� ..� 1 r�♦. ii r •: "Fr.- ,S.S. i'ia♦
Nu.�7 f 1 :5-- � ��). ..(. if4 / ,,j; ., r F'I" :� •r�'"f �"" l' - l
JAI
jm
� �{ ,J \ � � 1, Y � ��;d•�. . � r � , %' �, rL -4 1 .!� �^.T�li'� +�: ' •� � _ Y4' > N4 _ _ f`... I � ,
ti '� � X . 1 � �' jF�i`s �A.=,'_�t��- rs ''�ti- .r'y � �' �• � + -N . -f' � ��• s �w.� � �� '� ` ' • �` ' , �� �•jr
,` 1 J'� � =r r.1� , {r',rf ��: 7 F' i7 ~'" 'i'y.' '�l r �, �a `i I;� r�` - � -{• •/+� � .(t
i r. � ,� �• ' �d� �P"' j�' 'F .,r �•4`• +''r .'�' -!`,} +. 'I�j;. +;ff��. �'; �• 1 x - '�.'�}{�; !` "' � !: �� , �`i , iii
t 1 •• �, -, #�.� r -. s f `.it:t � "}��'a6 y�.}� �, • � }�yr� - j - � •1.7/ i� �£ i� ,.� iHr ' �'.' y '1i
�_' _ _ � .� 7 •r PT`Y -. i'i ;cr; l�j�'� *Y •�t�•- J r: � � - .'''J7 r'�: I+
i. - t f, .{ - r . , �4 y *.' � v �7'-� ( ��1 � 'f � ��: " `' f �3 r �r �' t _ - ,,t . ��'r- • + ;'. - ?' z � a'•a ��L 'LF�j..
:•S� ! -�,�� ' .•, �� y .� + f' rte. t- '�•�.i 1. F r �? tCi; :'yf tiA
{` �• ` , a . ' �< l� �• -- / / G H ),� , AIF - � .ri ' .'f - at]J., � F J
r i '.� • ' C. { !`3`_����q r `d• q- ^. V , • rd.' -' _ J �" y' ' •/,.. �r� . ti' fi� ! i
•r, i� -•. �: - j. - �.l:' "�- fr S% :Ai _ r� F}' -.� � a r �'•�:�- � •f' �� ' { f- �' .�t'.';'S J' •, � a,
.'�` _ � 14 "1Y • t.- I 7'. ,f,,y � +,K. / s ''`;'•�,•, <. . s'• J t z.' %'. , r _ "f� _ .. � .� \1..
i -,v�• wa - 5. !• ., �,� -ra a' 'fir . r1 •'
���'i' � ,�..1 i -i •Y ./ � t'�4- � � '�•. y'. 'sf� _ �� �, •r��r{r. � � `1�*� 'r � .i, a - /'.: -. J•.: `�,'��.,.r.. - -� •fit, �-
til;
fr J% � �.• i' ••f, -'1 i .`� 1 a • s '.�F �,. r r. • -�`!i` vf' .
i ��jyyy �� �.,,y� �r •. 1, r r � i , � }
'�,'! ��Ia'. J/I �_ l.e�:% �ris}�f` } •�'`ff:;'• � .s: d '�r {l r 'r• ."� / `-, J E I
• •r• ! � r° i °C 1(Ya�i'r �iR''>,✓P _n'��'i f : ,c •Y r - .fir {y ;,'
mfr ! , �'`� } � ` ♦
'(' `; �. q !z �,r F1r �� >�. 'ui rf�. r. } f`CryiF.�• .�I ;i•
� � •� �i� mss: ��" • -�.,, �Y . � ,��., � � :� �,; �i :�� '.•,; �' ,. �'�#;;fy{�,:t �
�' • � "V�, � S ••i' " +:sr 4 'j', 'r J ,}•x� -��k* -1 � � t'' 1 �� :�i
Iq
C,F •1
r •) � iJ�.•r � •,Ji y'' £.. -�. _ �•� { {'` i e i .� N- :SST:• i •iA 1:.i5. J y
NIN
I{.le,
?�- A •„ sr r/ i_5 y •�1'. • \�r'.* #�74f l r `''�i .. - (r�� �r.lJ P.yF �. i 't�$ .;Y 1rI' iil, •„ p'
7'i SF' •,/. - i�' �` rI � , �ij. •� "! • i , L�j�S,', i<[ Y� ��`.� �J��Y {� r. •plfH+_�•..,? �y� Y.r 1_Y:�. _ �. rr ' . _ _ _ � ir: �,y Z'�� j Fes. ..+1,...�"' _ N l�,
` i . r � Y'':ls ♦ - � '$� � ?is Y-: �'. � y ' "'! t • 1„ i�. - :Y, , -i:• ^+ \ �' tr• -'F•I. �:)t '! i' i � - :i i"' c �. - ,�,,.�11�•�� dy r � i
r ]� ?, a: r« �E 'r ;l - 1,.. :r yr t��4 ', r < f `� ! ,i�
'.t�• 7: �r` r' .i, -!�Y: ':1`• f J.. T. � -/ .1C1•.� r. ^. r r'+
�- ��f �•. / :�. l.3 ,{�}.''�.ti..- A. J'. i'r.' .r. 1 -:.. - ` .fir.
! r.
•m I ,
t
G 'q �� F'Yx ' '- % ') ^r' ,'► rati; a �.r �i!* -7 .1 "r' � r � ;7' � i :
M ,.;�'. a rye_. � 1 '.} •'r i ! r yet. �' 1' • � � li �" , i r. i^ �. °')''{� t' :y >' �.• + E� a-.
J . <: �- Y' +,�e �,� ;.r 'Y - ,.'Y.Ma i'�' •� ?: �k I!; �J '_ •rf r -1�'yT t 'r` "t, ti Lam'' �J,' }r
{ � . a1r�! - r'y { � 'ij%. fl�� i . ir. _ "�' �• }k., ;t`d'' - i - x)'` .r� .1 -��iF : � <_�f - �':' i
U 7 i +,a � +'a• 'ji Y •11�'% ' { y��{i r � 1a. :Y�' l:•f ,�'�. .:•r: 5. �� ,� 7/� k_4'..,; , 3.
LL C ' s r - �E t,• i'� �i % rAf y 6 7a• ,! (S _ w`i�,/�• .r. .) - - -� .!- + r J�� ;�I - j}4�' r r�
is I -' g �r!r. • ! • -r J a., ' _ • 7" n�. 1 rs .l'.• 'y}tr .� � � t•A� r`r r .. r . �I _ �• i��'v - '% �-
.'�. ,), -P y�,��, ��` ;`i:i.?!J %,'p'.{, i^a1r 3I . r' • ;t r°r- _I Sa -it' '; •r•"1• »4 fir. !1E ¢e�: ` �, yc�.)%``.
(( � r. ~ 4` ;�i, , , r,[ ,,:<JC. L'',�• "'rr J; .i .1,, ixa ;��'` ��'Ft ' � r' r ., r _ ' Z :Std £ �` •:x� �'•� , •� -��� .
j,. -i' - "1.' r l' •C J J r .. '/ :r •l. L. i r
�- /�: .+ ;'t. ?%'r /r,$ L.- jrJ• -dr Alti. t _ �� '. '• r. �,.'r �_ s"`� tr� -�4�•' �a v.
'Y./ `t !' q�:`" fr: �+`r,�.•� f. �{
�r
� j
0 'a" . � � l � �r tr• � y; J � , Yr+ r Rr . � �''' , 'i v . ! " 3 � ' � U :.;�' f
..y.tlfi t 1a�. • f.' �'- U :! f - - • Vl V C - ": + hr,•r,,, + ' .y, C �� l ,
, ! z T _ ,M° ,1 cc..( �, r r U -o .�.,��'' _ - � r.t •�' Jo, {. I' •,'� �� ,
r
R
#. -a y ' _ _ - °ri7q.C' S ♦, . >. ir. ' - '.r�J:,°�.'C 'w S` �` ' - r JI(I
d', ✓-:;+ n. %�. - J• ,�E..•ifr!' �ry �Ey`'. / 1 x• -, '� •3+ �{• '` co U dx
it 'l � 3 rA{ 'f . �. 1 ♦ -�•- •� _ L
rfji �f ,•��, "i ' f' 7' ".'y7 - C .}�_�' �.'�' r - .� ��+ � �� 1 ,r ,F- �n ,r� �: *
j {/�� < r ( _r , .. r 'r Jr/ :� 'fit �' t v♦ 4x x a o z
�rS�. i�'I �y� � 1.1k .. . '•if'Y , 1f• _ i . .•J A YJ, N ' i ✓. 'J• �4+r f �r'J •'A `M (_ p ��
�.:� 'x f"�Tr j`•i. )� ` .:�� € -•�. ❑ f' .r ! r M � � !�' U 'r r �'-wy,� �,f �'4t. @ Q1 � °mom
S
:[f la'ii✓a y,. + o �a�
E ��
0j3 09
,e.,•.. _ _� a{ �... A eft t R f>':i (.�. `' -.y r' , •p,•'Y:. r ' j `: r ' scrr "�" N, v ` t W
Cy .j.d i. t -'••. � ai ,�r� � '���i � C # fn � � l� mN w9 ° °_
't7`ir /• CO n W cn CO M * uJ m E t n ? a
V J L PC r 'ri°` ) �' �. '✓ 5'. r' •r C O O 45
,il' •X /� ! L. - �- 1 4 - A. 1 r; y + .:i r-. i 1 M Q
'3 ,r }' + r• i.. .,- 3 -r .�1 ' `.�r}J rx f `rl [i l , `�i� 9�.�-r *di. ,_' a- U U)
L) a 2L
-0 , �
.g' f�c' S �_ � %y(,� a �•' � �•• ,�E,>' -Iy�, ,f t y�,.•'" .�- �:r •�' i' �r :x / �, 1• �`�;C. rte: - 7 {fl (0 � RS v° O = W o
�{ ` _1 C- - �" }♦ �' TF Y `a*s� ♦ . ( , C. s ice .: O C C O C C �! !3 �' _
J/ i r►�+^ a 1 .. rt i. f_,:, k'�- ;a.r>o:�It . s s J deS =r �1 �] O O 'i O O > c p �F o 0
' •:,s,Tr•- -' l - -! I�` C•'�_':; a ",�_ s • `g'y LL
{ ► I j_ �/i�! r f 'tr.Ci J r s{ v ' `'i f°t ° (s • 1 i 1 f, t O — O — O L_ O q N o a m
�'SV'�y � -'i � .JZi /!ti ^ yr. Ji �`r �r' � >!l�•• '� 1' 'L7 � �O � 'O 7 = nc
4 1 '% s�. rr+t •. - �- r fir' R!`i Y' r��� r .� • 4' I- S ; + - 3` w� i C (0 cn N N_ U1 N iq EL r
blV 7 %'I' \ i ♦ '�. �" - r y:: 2.' _,� y -, ! ' • - ,,. }. / O 7 O 7 O J
Aw
.�I. ,tt'•(,.• f .t .�. LL r
•,.. ��I' ai <Of _i:l'.r -t _� '." {'�ilL'� _ "1: .- - - ia'�-' i :► sL
3 O C_:
� � o
J CD co
� 4) ) U
L
O
U Z
Z6 N
O
Z U
4} L O
C
"off
J
ra
d °
z�
� nU LL
SYr vi o rn w G
WV1 s?'m
9�
5
m
LL
m
x
a

w.
0 4D
- y+�4' -, .l .o'_ fev'. :,�yi•• i'R - - ''�l'`�¢ \�+ �r' ✓4 t,. -• C /'��*ilii." �. O r
uw
{ff—I
.y 76 y �. O C 7 U wi.'_ — ..:.�-%.e } � >>g' '. 1�, a. -lye - L=• �' S �V. ��•� .f ��'T zS`�' ��� �'%�,. '�i - + •1r f' L� — (C: Cl)
�l "�` j .141.,.x!' "� +7 .t., ? r I y ;r c L� I f i ,, 4 `*e • „lam .i �" L. j y o -a
Vr.� L K S aT�f'•)�r.��,a:.1►� ��i'��i�# `•
ire -Tiff ■', ,
EA
`} `/ � , '. I, ' I .ji t t.' "��.�'r.,4,� -f�F •V 'S'' i � -1. .�j•. �� :, V' ` ••�?p 1!'7ff�l �I. .y_ � ,F''.
/'�'�� E � i s'' .� }1 i T.- c'�'7. I �I. `� +4 �,( �'n'"'y V� _ . �.� • • / -°- �. 1`J a' r "7".¢• �',1�� • �.� ;
f ,a `'�' " i _ i� r -rr "'F !r .b• >�r;���_ '/ i /t , {� ,,,��' m • �' .;1,x+.. '�'i a �,,y{'�� i �l
`'!, t i C l ti 1 H• `�,>a � • ; � iC r!"a4�A'' .L 'lr., � � ni'
i •5� ...�., Z:'.�, .: r i.l.�a r ,cr� 4.���i ����..111rI ,�1.✓ S�} ••T J.
Yf� i ✓ r`ii � hrY_• � �.�•• ti 7�'� ! �• !t ��'a'Fv'IL71� .y�.: >:
;,Ir lr.fk �', !• ;.�� rz y _,� s 7— (. • ���,i� x.1'111 t
*..Ot ' �a �, s +L•• yy, x,.,♦ }yyf ',Y. i �a .X, -f'T•e1 { ..mow `"�`• �y�- •� !_
I�,l •i`� 1Fl i.•r 7 r'w�J S$ - .i Me • , t
it
7.' :1 t'y'•S %".rii`C- l`j• ,s #'rr - y �� l'• � - X41115 .ler� n
!.l�
r� _L J
L
1 r '�' .•', .�:' .�f 'It� � ';,/ - ''� , i ;�,�., �g�1�� '��1��,..jr ,���f: f. � rY� i � ��,
'�J +,t'i .6 ~G ;ry - r f • { '.t !� ? " „INV
-`11 �'J �it ' }:�i •L��r}l �,e��% 4��',�� .r ��+ ja 'S' � f' �. ir�;.•l rl ! l i
.//.`/"i� ` �p t•.J •� .i •'fin' �• � L •+rte ?f ,� •' I ti' -S,
4i• i P' fit~ - tea. �•���� -e•' t i l 4 /'� Fs• f �., a' ^. � / ,♦r��'r� .. '• 5't �C' +!`•., .. r�� l � '!.
� ; ! _ l �' � J LI ', *]��. � IL ;,+1 R ' ` [ L r •t�.� r 4 �• _ l'� L.rY� � � � � ` ��r ' +3 f •+
3 ^r'��r —c_�.. _T�' _ '�- .�_..1• i �; r •�r.i+.rr; ••_'..t t�. - - -� t� `�. °. I
�''
t r Pj �' • �i'+F
Ok-
( t•a"._ L ,_� Mel ,e .�4} ). ,1- ,;i ,,�aS• co
't', w Din+ + `'• i � 'j�' ' � % • tsY !� '�`
al-ell
r�Jl'� 'f >,•, _ �S i' _ .. .Y`. ti - •h 3� ^••C�yL,t 1����u� ::+1 *r y ` �f- ' -.r• ! fS
E4�+a'�� 1 _' 1 t ♦ 14 �31a1f /• y� .• �. � 4 .: r I
k+R s. !, '}r( s.;, • f,,,;,•_�.�s ',� '•>i•- -i.l `,,�'i.4 i"r. r a''i\ F _ +!''E ; ��f'~ ° •• H�, r '•1._/
co
. 11L4441�j� q ,•r 1.'�•` S!J �k � 1�
1F - •+ /,-i ry t -ter♦ - /•.� '� F la /V/� _, V f y N J �(V
' �r � -.a -., h L � f• . �- yrr �`�'I�� V/ '7_�� � �- � � ,E � � � � � C7
3 'tjpy ♦ 3'� r.'k r,t'a "'ca r'✓ ? �. E.
rte`' 4i
tlJ ammm”
,ii•/ •� y C Op��
p_ a c
d C O ap �� ooao
r r .. ' C C Y d
` r * C o O N f4 C mE L °�a5
" 1 e1 - f L C U! G m O c
o S2 3C
fi�t: • 1 °', i., , ,� o
O
� C O
U �
z
� N a
O
Z U
O L QT
Y
rCn
V O
0
A C S
9�

0
!� to
{J
r 1I Lr^� %4 �K y•�
'��L— .4•.r.,: ! •^, � � - a ' �- S: �1�♦ ', 15,,t x- .(7 � .�. �r � , J• I � L:t '. . 1! . , _ `f.. � _ 1,_,c = "�- �' • ► . 1 �E� •,f r. �i s+ f . „ iJr , 'Ymo``rt �+t•Y 1`
s '.1 ' { s �' ' -'`�- c Y„�f i ( :�''' � '' - � t . - i , 4 i r - � � J� r- `- • f � •1' ~ ► al 'F � � c � ' a P w . l . tr,.{`¢a— ' .: i l � F ' •l + - �{:ti y ".fy>, <> s *' ; •', ` <' �: �'rJ. ` y.y�,� iw�t. � 1 `' ."� l �_ ` � �_ • Sc + , ` I1 " r s iyI!iV , ' '`� r�. �uei�, s A, ' � f � - s + i� ' ?"�I ..s i z'."1 f. ���ti1 r ' . a ."1 4�- . �� 4 f � 1 �r �1' `rf( � '-�f. A ' �.- e r� 1 � . i. 4 . 7}�.Yy, y , t � � - 7 1P rt-+�,l'3 . rY' i C .f r � h7 -
i� i�•� 1 7• ,� 0k.' . � {f s+ L ', . ' "c1 � y� y- s r = c � 1y , s - r F % � . t � - � *4+' e"�YF L-"r' L_ a r ,� e'wf a F •7l't %Yt,�{ y �� ' �}C, � ;; ;. 1 � �y �• si f �� - f � �I 1 { jy • I '� ts O �/-� r' f l {� �- ,, �t .�' � f• �.�i ;a + .� i r 6'i - ` f � A �� i t � I V a ri . hS E '+ 1 • a �4�� �/11j j c •{1 � , - Ij
� 0"I�W
IF
L• .• c
.f f '?-S{ � C .F 1 � � '' r } n 3J' d 'M r M1r i �ry 1/ . L rf , 'rr � lr :�1'. _.t rre♦y� : ,KKKy �t '1 , , 4 ��� ' _ i � �ri''' � s � i y rY r 1 ' � � . F� .g- • r k ' � t a• . I d� . . r ` ` =l �=V J 1. i x X � d f • J ' ' .y �!
. � K , �• .',"b• l�� : i((iam y' � i - M1 d l �•.�r '� ' s�J S �� r' = � � s~ F � " ' f k •- `+4/ y �.IV �'.3 j j�" � I : � ''� — s1I s Y 9 �l � r r t j � ` . f L �. r ± • :I ` 1
_ r"_ J 'w l * *'+/C r� , � ' . . R r' l , ♦ i � �! / I 4� %G! ' i ,- 1 r� - � r !s r 1 ' � �I / ? '} � tDr / ' •' • il � l J. ^:r , . - l � ..af [' r X _ . � a l sy ! - , � i / 1,s _ , . : 'r , -� i
Y•1 }`?*�� . i � `!1 � ' I ! { ` � �l , ' a. E Jy! . . , - /}.,eT li, S . '/ , l p jr / ' � w !f3f ''�4 �'.3 : F r {1 r�a 7' ,'� , .1`• � '' r� ,r / � .� Y i k ` ,
,�j ` s:O C C 7• r I z' i� - -
, 4 t` t � # ,.0 • � t
j1} i�!' • . �
l'
`
_
.
I -Oro
16.
0� 4j f1
je� 6.
kv
Ax
f {f
Ai �
% C_
or
w O m E
d 6,U)
C m w u C � a
m O O 0 0 Z
• � $
Q s ,Z o ;c ' :
vi= �..- �`! - J' •�ri r-x` v;t r y -- t.: -z�rt r • + -! �' -r, �, �•'� Q U U C�,J U N c N m c; m
T .] (te Mn 5-0— co
5- a ° mores'
' n L 'L
r4 n i..i 7 -5 Z U LL ; rq E
_•�� i , I�ir' 1 2.
0
0
00
C)
a
W
CL
o
N
m
z
0
h
p
X
.r-
0
LL
O C
co r O
J CD {p
` U
°� o
�? Q} Z
� N
� C
�
O
�ZU
C (U Y
o
J
� o
a Q
g w
������++.III•III tog--
> zt o
W 413 m� C
WV] nay?
B
eL
V
0

.• .'r< ._i' .' 5' A°"y 5J J r.�, p � ;'iyr ft; ..;•
y'�1 i -/ t >;r :y, +L1 rr �^)•�1:4'''S•\L N• p,J
f• t•�,? yC�$�x' , s I* �. Fsr }. �c �N �c:_
—777- _ - ,. y. ►< �5,�
)' 1.✓• JJ, L j` a _liF ".- , !! * ' < - r • - `� J L�M + r a si('�y': '� _
not
}yam_ ��� }• 1. 5 ti '�! �. J' - ' ,t`,. _ �. .1 i •'�S 7f•'•„ sa �!i' i a
C4 is.. •._7�' I ti!' -SCE .'a r. uS / '•'.�. . t ,'�j� T 1 ,p _ - - it - r yai,. .
r
rl
r
F .1-. '� h'�;'•' �,iz'. •.Lti• , .� ~ .- �'l���� `';. 'ice - �''- `'`,i- �.�� � `
AA
. S7 . 'r i '�' � � �.r ;ax ' �' .. �• - • 114ic � -y,., - � c- � , �, • 1; `. - . �,1,. tt f 'fir,' �''�fjjyy�''',i�+ o 'i � ' s -,-Ly - P• 4-
t �;" r "r . , y,}f:+ 4.. 1 sG - J •. ^ i.F • .r '.'l�' - f 7t .it 4. �f ':i
� t .s�ji. - .�i'f /� r' _ - jr. r. - �zJ "`� �. f�4 %'r' �'�iry ti'i y., -�.{. .?• ..i�' � = 1 - v '•; �'• 'y.
y ! r `%� � , -'r , P �tr s � •.r. ' ? ,1. •R •yJ�'_L.:ifr i t •;` ,
r�s� -• .�}�. i. - .i'r vJ .,.� "�I, r•f T • '�•r - >i� � ..��•' � IJ _l. �. 'l .r F � {l �,�r€ •1' ��• ^� ��.t1� .
h - 4 . '� - f ,t - /� gyp" .1"- °° -.• ' 'iF r F } ,• S'r 4
l +L� i :`, �: G `Ir r} `• -° 'yam' l�f tik''��x ���'S'�v/.i? .� �. ` 1 7 }t _ �i •ga�j ;- `T�,c' � �;r• s; r � . �• • � : i r • •I' 'y �r
i - 5 'ss r •fY - ii f, :�y .,`• • ' L`,i� '�, f �,..,! !N /� +.' : /`� �. '`�} -' }!.. ,. / -�.,'r A 0% �
. t ,
ZV.:�„�, -
r, , [' •! ® s; y �I'. s 14•� *' �A
t' t`
.. 'LEr��lf'FFI��' k fe �i;. � • �
t ''Gr i�.ir 4 . ti S / S. C I I• - • t � y r ^! J f € 4 .4 q" �N•
. -*- - ' .�1 - `�, [vaJ1n 7w..' .� I', t .. r - Lf.�'{- -
i' f !• ,.'��.��a'�f;`:t 11e,^ d'��'''jSL �' r.� �'<� L• y' t
]j� #•' ��� .kt•� �. � ■ ■ ■�- 'll ��:� 'r• (._ Sr ►' ^.rh� .��a....v.� � „�M1. F�i� � ,..
3RA [4` .� • �- _ }: _ ? t �e t. o.} �Y� _�. ar • •�
LL . '� IY+r,'•'' [ i�y4�. YJ* `
- �r y s'r' =7 xJ 'T � r� P;:�RRR"'111 .�.r 1 r f' I - 7j- y��i•- ••a�f -+a!l t 1�` .� i • ;t j� r; 5y',. _. "" 1 < :1
fI, \ g r .j��R u` I -T t :/'r. - �" 'L '�•+•��j$j -,� r` -'�. I I• -F ••x •ter.:
7` � 'I�� �. �►; � y i 7i" 'may ,r1 -1 {.d � y --
.:;. \ `/ , j. +`� � ,�,;}- L .: -� �� ���,,.� :� r �. ,'ar ,I 15 •t d R ' �t •�_' -�,, j*�f' � r'T - o �r����, �j �,1• ~�:� �t `.µ ' 'I�,i`' -�,
A A+�Lt t ' %L ,` i.. +s ■4r i�` 1. C 1rr%+; r: ri 'rv1 Y, t`. �' i` L �p ~;; t�•t }?7
•'ti �� \ � '1; ` 3 •�' .� '.rve >� tl�/ '�•,. .'�+ �"'h•R: :Y�
F,r � -+`- f \` [ � �' r, of ��: -' •x ` �Y. � lI � � . � r•/��
"RAP
er� +' *�F .. yrA•'�� .. E�' +.. .rrj'..;y � \'' ,�L ...�Zr_.. r', _ ,j i y�'�.y1jy,'yF,� Al �°a f
r J, ��,' {' .t _� i ,I, •�.• '` -�. t ^,.!*SL r4•r,-Y[ y�
- f 'r•`i '\` �.,! K �'�.'. -�: _ a� ` �° � •••R, �;�,• .4. •/1 751- ;•� � ' 'w t., •,, ,� ; 4 ,S '•�'� '4'
T.
jr, St' 'L—
jf y
k `
y ice. C � <4i �'�* f•.: J ,' ` 1, - ` y�4.� �l t,•,icG:+��,' •�C
..•f' "� �`�:. � '. •' -: ��i ,� R ' "!y .i' s yi'' t�t :�� � ' f ♦'a -mil �,. �, r!� i6 . 1 :I ...r.u,J r. <„
t4 l �L,� _ 1. S 9 .:� t� la / c Y,� _ _ a•TY� � / H .w 411 � � -� + •r'�'� •� 1
�.. ' !,{4� a t. 1 .. i .4 , ` �' •, y „} '', � + � [ %i' • \ � �y � txr��� J . e'0a �� , fr � ._,,• 'ts, � "Y � ^ J•r,. r,' i•Rrf..�i i ` f� ��' �•A' •fiS
',f =i'�` •• s 1 :L.� ., i1 tiv�r� y err' ,� '\ 'r
1 1 i` f l l ] CO,• ( r s R
�
.� ¢ •�, '1 [`�t } 1' F �_ si^ • ' =i !f ��� �� •5/ ��' r \ 1��. ,.lC •a -�s` �'.` .'ll'�• '"' �' � i• t i'i =a ro_.' w- l: ,�11:ri �%.'`•J�. A�!!'1 iF �r�r'- `
� i� {• t�'• 11 r� �l;- yt ��Y• /�/� ��� •�• '� °�• \ .r ,� J �I . � 4. ,,,p� '/'. :� � � '�i► i• : - °_ ��r i"� t�'� _. Y ' %� tl, ,{
i.'[' •"` Rai.. .*A V J • 'at� ra °i . ( /J( % -�! fk > �• ;S,r 1'� j 1 ,.'^�' �w t,! s'Y�\ 4[: .a i �. i - ', -' •a)[i' f.
r! ' t� •i 1 J J - '!Y •�� _ r Y.� • F . � ' ` j_ 9.• S' ' � �� • -� •:.,� j\ .F� � t, - •,.�• ��py Y � E9 .'1 � . f fs -�� '� +.k
'dJ,.', t'1 "1 '. tr � !• °�- , � h yr�r�u- `yC cFli� ' �� ,;�. � \••6: � -_ t`�, •• ,4111 -.i , y�arrr 't x � F �- -� Vii. `��ri.. Q•• Sri., I ,.��. 'tf.!•.iir
�` -'> `, s` ,f ). � .�. f , ;4 •• `•�. S � ` � � � °.,Pr, -,�S <' s. '`', if � }',,.r =� •, 1 f [. ' ..�+�
i -. `'. +�t7�: �'�, '�•i'i ��': ^r �} '3.a/ ` '4 j -yr._ _ ,.i, s• r 3a�..si' $'-.. - xsr:• C.
-� '.s -.- r
j / R � f
u; 7'4` , ' 1 � - . ` 'r ..iC u,� L , A. • V , r "' ,�i' try ` ',r7i ` •t C ;1A 5 �. +r� •�
;fi' -a !__ if ,i -.r% ;' ti••i'i�' + - �„� A ,tiy,f r �: "'jCd ?s cc` /•�. `\ � r
' i.
rte• �:� _
•.!'' r•'� ?'''�. � - i 1} �k t4'�� , r , - ` -� a• \� ' / �l? r" � R +, }.�,• wept
� �r.N,' � :fin" .�i `.i ! ''}[ - t:�,'• t F-'f..�'�" ,, ,�.. -�;t
�.�i '.'•ry � y"} .n. ��k�tr 1° ,.i�. �•. `i• ��� -t. �'. s.n ! '!_yr• }r AI,•' +,r� �• .E t!I
�•�/ � w�' h 'E�, �} ,� - t :4< �.,r� x , •' i'�•�'• I.• ,£e ;• -:ydr' { .4,�r.'r�';• .tk„ ,y�,�F�•
- '� f:'' J. a � - . . <F �,f., �[� _fix' l► r
'� � .�,y. ✓ � �'' � K� w'.! '; r. 3t .y. _ t11 f sir: ,tW: ' .•F , `, + � -
TIT
yam"y
�R + ET 7�r�9 �.' `+, * ►LL i''•JI.Y � `Z.,. 4 - `I'i.: ?- ., �C' �r �' a � S'�
,,,,ypr�`r` %.F�'i `�'''''J�•V�.• 1 r F. ��• .� '.. r g�+ -ri.., ' � a• .,1� L •c " i G• S' kj' S. s .•� ' •,� ,�':,; r
1.5 •
_ � '� � 7, Y"} t t - \: h;L"
Vie' ' • 4- •4 • � r r
� Y I.� f -
rye' ..
r •
�. �`riw� . 7 Y4rs
; t��. t C�. r
''t. ,- t
a
x`s o O H
' O r
• � N
•,: c Y M
a �
m
a` o ❑ i�
�Y
."<i 1
-M
1AA-PL. "!1
a
..
e a
E��Z
terr,
C
�� oy
C
s= O E
�
= "aa
#
T
,
a` a
(R ��tOt dl �`rrn� ��/r•, fU �G N
C o
c `a a HIM
M
0
u- O l6 n g E 8 o
O C C C C 0 7
CO O O m 0 0? U z
C7
G
? !his
f o �aFOo
O U C) O D U N `i
LS
G o
oU c9 man
'L
S
u—) fn n to to n
j N@
U
O
+ a F c y
O j Q}
U��U) z 0 L L
oQo
II(II�II
II Il
� n
O C
C O
U
� � 7
O
c`a Z U
V O
J
.a
d °
z_
9
$ t r r O
t,
a
O
a

lift CA 0
BID W
S 4M�
awl ev •
-2 L.L� m Jnlx E, a
jd
— mi ss
01 LL
LU
26
4OW
0 Co M 0
Z. 250
21— FE" - -� E� 'I �- "
xr,'" - I "I . E A
r7,
r
C)
OF LLJ R
m m C', z
,i •r� nk ♦yi 0 JD
ft.,4w
C2.
U)
1; jr A •�O ZID ZID
t LL •
OWN
Q
PRE L
.4-4
VIA all !%
ilk
"NA; A
X"
3i
>1
ILI 11
t
T S
51
POP, 4Lt
4
IJ'
4 A
"
;NM
- v S Y1 A ;
r-.
MU
4F
_he
y (D 05m
-1- ;7V I.v.
❑ R.
MIA
4
le- YNN
lice-
OVA
W.
now
T�f
�S, lop
7-
4 V YA 11
d1l IL
7..
IL
ww.
k 40!
Nov
" 1A
%
'AFT,
1. 40- 7
0, 01 V
iT
At, If
4 .
jg
old HER 1

O O H
i] �' i r,, •!b' #, I:r'R�l 'r�1 >..f {i:. .lr I Vd.i C •G i6 cog O
Of
rirr r� •t.7 r.�• �} I' -`' /� f y ei/`..r r."�� ;t J Fes- �,i '� (r !r Q7 C
LU
'n ` o W ° a
.� 4 _ .•i r f `• �, J•{K./ #1� 9_� . :y f,'� a �,' :t, `}' ! Y�Gr r ,3 ` �"� `8 °s
a o ;
yJ� is - •�1•P`' i'r' r+7 •.w� - { i. Pa - F' ^� wolf
.9 fl) m m ' °7'1• � �+-LU C O Q� O N E K r -r
i 2 c -£ ``ooao
r - i -' r . i,: ���rrrrrr .� r/1 t. f .c• .�,t�'s _ ��'.?4>•• a 'a O V (� N d u°> m ° °a m>•- d ❑ ❑ Lt ti ti : ;; '1 ��•jl t. � . r a l a = -�. i ,1.11-1 ti ' �' ,.f .� � ` . , . i�',- '' fkf' �t. } S -yam N { % s, (t • j (4 (� O f4 f4 C6 N LL V c o m ° e 8
.it r•sjjl'� ,,;'•�.h':,. �hq 'r ¢. r.{ j.yE. A ���,, i ::¢• =j. ; i. r. O C C C C O •O D p °�
O ? z C ~ O = r= S a
Z
y�,:5.� - ' w `, ,rr� ...;: .x S ` �" • ,k #, .3;s ". - 41F ", + .,.. +� ' ':�:__. ' `'>4 -' :Ef ' ' r`k 'CS 'C] O s - g
�' S' � -� } f. f �.1� ., jrF i ;f. r ;:� _ � ' -i • yi ,,,, �j r! j,7r' •r ".r % (, 'C fA '�
/Q ' UQ UQ
h f �n f.a :' rY• �i3 . n �/r;rr- 1' -...` r +s' �'1 '� � p L ©--2
`f. . •. }..- "'/ski tr.rM +'. , rte,'• a'px^�. y `Y`'• „'��; •�.•�Y'aY. �%► �• '3 „t V '7 7 Z —7 Z LL
�.1 . 4 `4T 4 J '.gy.,E • S i : ' if - ' '• _ 'L � ! w . , i ,` - 5 4,• �� '� ` Done I I I V7 n a
4 t �'�r tf y�� ` '� ' t`� -J'r �* -Fr; tA9�4, � yy�� . � ' � )*i.- *` f � l {f�•L ' ,'�� -
t �,`. 'r .rr'•'• `f .r,r ']f;r 1 ,( 1. .� i ,;.. r !a- ri''• a ' x ^.; 'i -1 \( Sr''
r•i r •./ Ri� - ^ "! o � a. - '�`�.�.' �S.r~ -'f; r r 's• 4 -�T �� �;i _ t y'• ] s <'
1.:,7'..r,�i ; r# • "�,;� j3? -'�}� �ry}}..M , ''/ ''rI T��, .;i.'. f ��t rr,.l ,;. r- `
w _ r� ` t,l- - 1, -• f.
• r ✓ . { fy: r }.- ��'�5 i`T_- ''f',, �� - �� ,•,!, .f��+��•j.�- (, �f�i- ��!'�'#S� tL' '�'ft. +�. � r' - '.L. �, e•• •~ E' `. i �' � f%�.iK��•-
fy..;; - 'JA VIZ,. L
�
.� >�-rF 1,. :�..,+�../ t< C 14t ,kr i:,. _ '` r �,' r• .ti �L''- r. 1� �.�.: t
g,t� .. �,'1.; ,�;,+ 3; yft ' S� y' y..1.- k�yi= �:i•� ' }±, yr ., SiS.. r: ',{(/`j' §i .�''�} r
„r� t .yr• .c. '�' - - .3r �,~,~ \,M�wr t'1,'r - L + r. 77^`•r r.
r.,� / '' U.':,.� "T �;• �. 7d: teK ri].., y�T,.g4a► -!::t' l �w:� "'i.�. � '- p.rt,a 1Siw'r
#44ir ' P•• � 5 ' , .'fr v "',� " ❑ _ , l • !.:+ ,f.- , °'►' , . ,. ~ F' ` i1M { r'r.. w .[� u • ;.�,` t.i �a�. lr• y ! ylsf r ..S r • :F �'K } .... :,. t', `,s''.. �,�•
i. . / .'{1s.,. -; y -�' ^' � � 'ryr+'W .!\ p 4', 1 � ,��t .� �`•�.: yK�' • �'�� . � •4� �� s ` � , ` '7G - `� +' V �
! ?F Yr
co
❑ h ',. $ r+ ��r'.� ,.rte- •,r� /( •i
S _
r
+/ s,',' —bG. �' ' `' '� ',, '` KD } .F. *: .1, `' c 1` - .iii' f� :tyr �.S3; . ;1. r 'I� ✓-tj,,, .i",•.
f, �` E`V '�:,5• , fro � ( ii „� � + J � „ °�', +� E •fix: -{ .� �, t ,'h '��' is �+ f�.;-d t �� ""�•- :i+ ,/ y�% � �!% X
yy`R��. ❑ '.T •r'��r.' - -P ''f i• r d �'� �, r J t s .y�i ..+yS�.'t t A
+' ( t. S.4 i y � .t ❑ �' ��� R,- '•ti�~�.,[.;•�'r ti '' SAY ', :r,�r• s� rat, r� r'r
' i, � U S �•�'• .i _. t" .� - 4'' � � ti Rrrla• r t . Sc', :: ; �, y 9^ t�, y {rr _',
' � ,F��, ,`. f�T' / ❑ r �rk �, r > '� y ��` , r 7FyJ � �`..1,� �, !���p ,� C_ � `
,rte 1 "' i��,: T n- 'n .1, . Y � f f .,, � .•. .li' S' I � 1 4z' 3•r h' JG
`' 'n �. 4••�� ♦,'!} .y � i'.rt. r` NM�'15 �`•' L+ ` �,�'•,J �i!��ys.. ��E � rr
. `,7 f :rte j ��`` // �. !+ , Fr ♦ -"
.sa • ❑ ❑• {,S.y.• ' A,'/ --+ 1,Y N• -y' S'•1�.#.k' 'l• .4? /t;' }r v !:;:
�i.l ❑ � i ���"�'�'�'. T.��l1�-'a 'r ,J .QO S'v !•. •(� ,�. ��h, .�.+��4.t Y �J`/ �I" V, fi���` {, -: L .•�+•./ :5 � .� f r ^�r• ' +fir 13[� -�, •'J ,
� � Vy s r v 1 � y� "�D! ' �C� �. r '.0 . f '6,���' J S � �ii�. , s r_ ❑ �, ' '3 -1'.`' �,� � ,.� •.�,' �',. )' ” s� �" �� f '
�' ./ �! ���4�•r ,4 ��. -�, '�� :�, ll .. �� �. i f' .S' •yl r/ _ r. e',.Ey 1F!`i:. �`�� -� ,/j' �;r� j• .[� ;,� .•�
4§64
/ V� ti rr -•TF rf 'Y �{' .y - 4 i �` 14, 1 r .f'Prj \`. t '•� , �,f r� `�, _ '!.
L :t 1 ���j� �L�fp1 � ,r' T.' "! rf - A� + •r c' � "�e - ���.,,• , � per+ ? �, �,
'� , . \ ��� 4.1�l1 �` 1 �, ; r , rE ' °�)f a � • ' r �►•� ,� , �.' •4 •s 4rj� 8. isY�� � � : ,ylyE�} Y ".�'� �I' �'} �Y /� %i4.. y ��S '1*► • "r . "�, ,
•c�.r� •4'e.':l'.•.`s�. h�',•: St T ^ I��.J9Sxfi:•,� �A y ,•c. �'i: •has` f ��.�� _ ' ;'.r `. �f /, k
'° i�! f,v, ,/ i � ,��[/ RL` .s - '� �• ,�' :,,,r+�'r 3 .j- {�� 's ��•� � r �.k� J �*�+'.. } _ , >,'- ,'y,;! ,L�:.i?�t
y��tr f r r+ <Z�. . S a v .5,,• "- '�1Ey/y 'ti.
dd
F; eIN
m � � r`�r, .,'!�i ! �', - �� � �.% 1 - �-.I. IF � {yt1!• s3, _ + r`•�✓ _ ' � ��' a _ • `. : f• � Y`�. f J, a`r -� ' .y. "�i.'IIs
i� ~ -4�� r� . "!� r a � :..� r � - 4.S:Y _ i r.ir K �:,' 9.. 7 �' .« � 7 r' • �' _ .
rip
f +, 7 t .r' •I -�`+L° 0) (��.rf r ( \'. 'r) 'r _s �/�w�: + .' 'i �lrj;� '� r ❑ •r 4'
{ - •�' ' "�r� ti `)•` r .-1., , -f5? "r • � �.-r{ '�.i✓ ; 'g"`d`f' i •'. .,a t;`' //� i f
d { r Av r r, f �.1 r%r ri nl•� a"ir i'•,-j �, t !r i sr {
r R•$ •. {mil r ,r, r i `' '•,, flrlS ,{ - _ ' .•i ' .,,t \• �ri� rc( rN, Fiti ' }Y� .. -. ►r�- '�1 tl..y,- .' ' 1
X17 i a e, ' E A' 1•�; j �� �i SSS... �r • r w ►
t
A
• , �' lP� -f�,y� �,u . �;,�. .y .. � ry � .:'�s � �;�`,� q�_ Y , i.� r. • ' J �. •t �; , , Q M y •a ; �1
' -' �� �. .. 7'�.`.. �y ��s�''"�• '+� �` � f�0 � .. `, �'�` it: 3'r` ❑ .fir .,4yR��li•
�M it,
► , ��V1�o- 4Y� .�1 Ip '� �F' 1 �►(�F , 4 r? i• * �'• -� t °3�' � r .* , �' ' :�, : � y r t7, _ .F • '�' ' ' I � N
� ,-�'`� ' �� `i' ,� J y. �' r ❑ � ❑
y ' t i `•' F �r�� "K y y i� 3,5 ,• _r j , f i Y: -f,�. ,L. ❑
" EL
:�j�� r�y 'Y` �y °may /'i 6• j �is ,r[,,'.ai.rrlry, 4 i �. er. r• `er.i t -0'' { t- :ia.
n (� ' L,. `�eI b► T7 /+ 'r tY -i; .l' h. "!•'�;._'..�k,�', . '. -,. r tA,.r�.�Y!- '� 41 •�'X �,,
p,L,l "�'t •�i'7• '�. .� � +'• .6`• -r . ♦ 6 P: ♦ � i.y.'1•. k�µr�. �',� � :� CER - >.- � , / P•'" � �� _ 5 1 �': •
a
a
e

} O O
..•���g r..ry+- r - _ _ _ y- r _ 'SS .7Fi -. -,t. '[ r .4 N •eh - / "` _' ',, ` G "o o CD p C'
��•� t�`• _"r i Y c ' S4 - �7 �5 4 - }t`z' J - _s' { -Ei' } .: ,. Q% w? o O
�b .• � f� .4,1+1 l �¢y ♦ 9 1C- �,yiwti JaT��) (• ' � r 3{ / K , 't �.t Y :� ' , s ( _ � �' � ° � Z r C �
G E @
`,r G ro c o Oo
r' q'i- -e •f r% ,' J? �S�`�ti`ia},s�'"4' i `c a o °e O
�'.�`�1wG
� �- - •�.� � ` E
(c(..rC~S;r y' �"y: qj // / } yt,Y�ia .35 Y..;, a.J'� -:S JT -f N b,!•. fJ� r '! * C O a �°e Wa+ wn =c u
�d ws.3�I{ ! ! t ?fir' �4�Ji�.. !n •s / -a "• ft%`rrtp r aa S." 07 do Q
yi f •fl •itic ' *: ! � . ,r S r't t /-JJ - !!_ 'S 3•� #� rr!?i G -r N C E cc ° U U
C' . ' _ j .f .M1 ✓t;'j_. �r ',. ♦ � • _ t + r h _ y -. F. ie (0 Q ° o o a) Qj 4-
s X o
;?' / � `r••7z's' % '• '.� �-'Y �% - �4. ^y' - •ik'`GY .r ri �'~# G �C1r _ .. J _ _ r co G.i p _ C L
°�`GFp'''ti:ixr., - - 3 v1 .�:.* } �,Si �.� i M. E • - - a i` -�` -O ` +� d U fn UJ O oQ o��a'c !1 ❑ ❑ 11
''r �"t ...q '. �'% C. -'a. .r ' -1Cti ::. "- '7ti�3/�-i��"'• on u
'� .- �.., •�, ws 3r y a(' '.1 F ' -, y.. , r ti'rl, - i" �'7' -. -ter:, .f,•� 't,7 �'=- `' - �••r i k i� SO U, (L) CO C S o °
z C: o €�
S" 'Y ,' • i '% O c o
O O O c
• a o �
J •.iJ u_s ui R m a
�i�'�' ySr t� p L `- G O
���r ~ � �. 1• t� }• �r I � Q ogge
Al? iir. LL
�fT! r: ,'�:` I W �` : �. �'M!i r - • ,s, -�u�`. k '� �.>:, i• ��}: _ . ��r�'- i�� r'. J�_ �� .
�` ✓, "r ` g � rll ,� Y ; S ' ��, ' ` a` t�- rf t ` � tr' -.k }�7 }' +� �;ti , l ,..'.i •r
yy � - .�(c/�}.+[��r s •} 'r W ' � � [ Y s 1. "zyF.�' �T.. -,w..� � iy:',f )p. i�..,' •1'Y'� � ,i /'' S 'M �':�,.�,,.A. �,._�•' - '`i r ,
f'•%`� Y. '7j '' '� -5• ` �t. -.�[ r ��F� .k -. it is J. 4-. !` .�� ,l I Tv.f nom: -
sy / it � �,�'' ��. ,1� ?- .R. ` �` ,�`�„1�' 4�� y, ,��' .''-• ,s�+gf ,/�,� . ��;
r JM � r, � �. � �r _r '.. :� � ,` a..� l�[�,;,� �-�- � � *• '�- t4a y� .., y,, -� t• =a .i
lu o� r "AI
LL
.?� '•�. �i. ''• t f•s J�. - ' -r' i. ` r. � w.4 {... •i: YY,
P.
,;,�`f? .fit • � }i i -r r +{� y. ,', �� ' s; >i'taJ�•!,. ' � I • .. Fr���'.. ?' � ! � , ��, �;'� ,•rr I ' � /��
co
'a.� �� ''i� •Nr,' � , •t' #��, f• }++ '�}�S. � .r j � .,y,- � �J`l�l� �r � E6�� �{ ; t � �4 '� 1� � O
,' -� j.__... -1 r s,. - ''.'4r `: t," s;,,: '•e�?' .r -�.( ',t y 1, I U Q`^� z
MIA I �r ❑ I
�r t,:��, •Fk '[�i � � rT � J � e'" l r i E+,ti t � � ti E,' '.�' ✓. kkk� �
` 1. s° 1f' `�� t t� � � s� ',•' �'� J � � f �1 �~ ° .• fr� • '� s�S'�-"t- � I'� � R ` 1;.s�sr is Z U
P(fj Y W `�4. . "i( /�Oy�Ri a• ., r,,r 4,
• 1 w ire 4 '
a' C
Qy Stl
►i 'Ft. r yh,- I°+�;� Jl+ u .S r Y" !" : i :�- ►•,' (r4 k ,' Yf r !'• j` j�` �L i y f.
�r����' {. 5!`�{� ., W - � i �ti �'k�� "` �•J 7 iri ••� �'r +v.� � '� ! l'`' i ,`1 :j a' W ���) ;�� 1 ` ►• r•'' � O �e ��' (,7 O
�. ,4 (i .q 4. -.t r. �f]1}.��" i�, r. �'•. �. -I}�` r° V ,•�! tuI
y• JL
w
�'4r ' F• :tw ,r ��, '�� a '�i' .V," :tt` �', t ', <•�f !T �'! ," ',a - -.
Ti i } .al "r i.ys• ., ..� � sr, y;.�
4
0' W
. i.
I * � r ,Y. �''A1r71da ,fS'r •J J ��•iry�1� � Rio r. _ Ii,i i�"i', t�'� w ;�;�„ ,�' �'; J
it Cr - �• ^`'�' .,/ M , I ,��� � Y •� 1�: :.� ? � i �I f ! . � J
W
- ►'.. * f/. ,� }, � "ps AL y `,z 1�.e. r�f{f �� .." i .` .+ r,' Y' %' r. J '•r�y�y� t r �: Lq��{,,�r� .('� i ._'��J ) m ,, .� ` i � J c11
ti•. ,c � i / JD�. f �i�\ -,�j.. �{' a ��. �r� -a � • I . � it "r- >+S' {• C- ; S- �,'f,j' i- 1 Y .yi. .S. ' ;'fir/ Ste. �S, � � m 'h
♦ J�' %,•y rr� f. <''�� .$y r"
{ 'r'
M'. '!: I' �' +.�': ea` ; ;l' ..�, r r: `o'' b,���1Jj w r/ !`!."j'�t�'j► - f 3�'. t» �,.
�•�,.��+�. #+I ��; �t� -�e+ S, y r�� �.►�/ �'yl ►' o - r. .`7,1� �F � 5 ,�,. � ` 1 �i•�,', y4 �
fib fi,k i �?'.. :! "'Y ;itr� •, I ._ �'ril. A5Q'''sT , .A �/° • s Aji•.. >: s .'i. �.� c
Cs'{` �� '�.! s'a +��'" 'try '# !`fit "ys: J �v k 6'' • �'jK�`� "tf �.�'
.�,.f..•. ` "• '1 s +�av e�t P'�11A4F R yh''s'K �„i : > - f ' - �� .}1�"r `�- ' �-f' 1. `_ r"' -• i
.A • ������� nJ
%:►r "! �` '+ r .' -�, s `49 �t jj�sgg., ,li' /. 3 i'r. f� • r { y�i • i
_ �� /I• � • �•� ��J �'S •r t �v �
to
e I y► `i�'•��1`.is I >• � � f� '�� �' y�' >• 'mil it F , ,• 11,• '
ey
1, ��
1/ •! t- i! : rk' }' Lit
.), 1 ri, err s ��s�' r ...###1 / r ✓ /
' • s 47F` "l' i s rr r�L, R i s o
,�' F { 1 . %!- A ± � -. . ✓ " a; . e *t � *- •'1 }' .;'- `i / �+ ! .# .• , t L •' � , 1«• , Fr � a � r AI •y -1 i ��1,
� WJI(�4q -- ,�ty� � a�,j +:'.t Jt,��'y,�� ,��. � ,X: 5 Y / •S -•,sye ♦ f �• ' "` r i� � � a '�. ` -� I � s � �
2 T''43i /�- f /r..1 '4 �
>' �' •/',

a Li i
r
r Rr R- A
vV
No
A
LLI
rn �S + ♦f ,'♦ e'er.' :rte. .i j w ij, ?�
.fe -��• ya r� � \ '��j;r� p•x����. _ .'� .�i• ,. �E: r �• ` "r�' r � O a ��' 6j �• 's ,�
4Y {�_ +�. ti�tsG�',.y/3 .r .S'2� " F� "•j, ,�, '�'- '�r °..c # �J � }.�• fc "" � Y �i � '�, :'f•,
'iP .t'F - e r�' 1 ; i.�fe : I 1 i �E r�..,3 ,} Sl•r. f,.
�. � �•'.�' a. i s. ,� ,r Sri �a' >� � -:r f. � � L i.�L, _,js /' ��; ,. f ��• ?° rr '�,�
st
ti/
• >'. 1.� + :iT �r.• �,,�r�- L� ; ♦r �'�. «_ ! !'. t �,. �1-y�a -.�5y.
• „i t-�'.��5��' 7M1l '�. r I,J ��V •lZ�r" 1 r. 3 �.'- . �i �Y,a' {.. .a +� �;�r -' .per r �, . j�y �, .! • _
7f 1 'j,r•± .r.'�'.»:.'y,•h� - .�. Yi, 'J';,. - .t, 'i• ti•... J, ' _,,!,`�;f:•r ..•r�". ,.. { -✓ y
Vm
'S 14 .Y
f #! JQl y'� l�� i- �r . {•. J '� {�.i =•.',y� p -rl �pI � S "�.i�• .�'��' - } r
�'U � :?• j -1 r�. �[�. 13::0 " "�'� 4' ,� '.� c � -�
. try f - r;t� - ,t 1% {! f •k r �f. �..�� + "� } � "4s< �A?� /� f�
{`',,7' � I.L '.ya! {.., :r A , 1i t ' �! � i' �',,� -, `t4'�j��, '' III ;'�r -. - fix, r ,, �t •�` �. ;'�r ru-i�
Y4rl `s{4v�i� /}j(y�jryq��{�l/[[(.rr it Lr ,K �I�'�,j'y�.,j'j�.7 /j^lt�T •''�i•. - Sl I +' FL L„ - r-p l L •r 11 .dy \ `,
Jam' ..a`�tfl��` 11��a's<�il���iy' •� ,'(�Y� �„ J �f�i kJ. �i�i i�iAti� {. ...- . rw'L�� ih C y.1 � � - �' � • 14L�1"l l+r���4.� L, � M1 I ,
p,m
r4 R
r.
4tri. ti
tit
r
til
(Lr
' ,� }3 Z! a. ,� � E 7f � ,sS•Y'" if.4. 'n#'`�.` +�.''1 Y' p• . ,�i "y - Y
r"f R'�'
♦ l4 C � (a o- `coon
yW a�mS
+J X
2 a �➢� o c o_°
n 3 y r e
c
CO
w rO E 5 `c as o
S �G' G O 2 2
�- ° �ocon
cod �U�� �n o a4
i'
G
CO X N L
CO
O U U ^` � i5 ^} O O N 3 c
'a ;a 15 W W C C n L
'� j In
@ O
U-5nZ 7Z lL. a U) Eop3
c o
M
a 3 co
O �
O
J � �
CD U
O
U O
�z
� C
O
v 0
J
o
z go
0
c� aso� o
c N
O
a
Q
00
o
H
w
-d
Y
L
U
v
ai
p,m
r4 R
r.
4tri. ti
tit
r
til
(Lr
' ,� }3 Z! a. ,� � E 7f � ,sS•Y'" if.4. 'n#'`�.` +�.''1 Y' p• . ,�i "y - Y
r"f R'�'
♦ l4 C � (a o- `coon
yW a�mS
+J X
2 a �➢� o c o_°
n 3 y r e
c
CO
w rO E 5 `c as o
S �G' G O 2 2
�- ° �ocon
cod �U�� �n o a4
i'
G
CO X N L
CO
O U U ^` � i5 ^} O O N 3 c
'a ;a 15 W W C C n L
'� j In
@ O
U-5nZ 7Z lL. a U) Eop3
c o
M
a 3 co
O �
O
J � �
CD U
O
U O
�z
� C
O
v 0
J
o
z go
0
c� aso� o
c N
O
a
Q

pp Y .�,. �, + ;4 .' {, ! � x .��'� ! ! f': +' {',;-aes 4 t�+ '.).�f � `'i;�.�. _�.• ,s ,� s. ,! lr`'r ,� s y . �, f .. * � O O �
IA - i =- . •� � .f' J / r- ` �', i t �i,:�lt/l /II_i. �i � x i i r, s.. -- •i���!� e "'s,'•�:i {• .�`i. l�� .jti ;. `� '� ?' �,t �F '�' x`02•.. � r (•7
:, ' �% r %�JS f'� '.J :' >'rl °� kyrL..:,�ji,• .t��- .'ti,•'.L••��y j•'•0,`�, „�,'1' 'S�;,'�! ; J.'(_ _,,.� oag4 O M
Z , -y +�'t �, L Y�g }�•! �5., l +r'i, 'S''}•� t �� F�, -1�- �t�' '�r t�r�J�' �: `•�''��� � f'. •C }' 4i
�,
a 71` `r t 1s -3 F' � �. , ./�1 � i�. •'f e. i ��- - �t S- `a g `n CO m
'. �: /* ,f f `j `.Y• ' �•1 �4 -... /+�' f6,r� �� j ti,1 f•�'� �: #` .ya .• C E
X UN aAO9
W a
CL
t „+ ♦ r� -�' ii44t t' J 'ta6f C t �o y,co3
y f •'r',r 't� r T•r- ,- - �... +i`' .� �; • t. i. 1 ` •s 1 J i '�, � . F• C — r n_
.r5..• `► r , S ��'S % <+ 7, �• :Y'• f •e :, ti.: r� ,�F �� {, % i yt 5 / '' ,. -: +_ y!1• „J,y it f %' * to * •fn C * co m y o o U
!/� - � '�- .E `ti•- ��n }>, _ ,,4 t • 1 � � . / , � . _ � N (6 f0
�! h 4r i 4. �• : -f Y {;�f ' � i ' ft r., feFYT3 f -� r' (xe ti y� yy. ^,"i >y - C O O al x E L ° ° z p 'M
,Z 1. >_% ti ; � fit . tL ' .i• / f . J� 1`. • .. • . - -7� �,is t'• \ t',l" f � it r_, • •� , (0 O O L +i-• 2 G t_ C a o ,`o o r; o Co (6
r > is �>F h' pt t' r.' y�• / r • r (� O .� 0 0 o n 8 a'c > c O 11
a- ,'-�I ~ -� �. `' . -� L `"" 1�{'R ? -,' '•. ,s ', •y ` ° • -rtx -; 4+ '�,: s'- 'rtY;;t �°Eo2: Z5 E
s• . • � r dS ,, ' , r . �'I ° , L - , •°�. . 4 - y - :.s. d' 1j~ r •. ✓f'r -Y i i + 4' s ,,� 4 . C f0 i0 O) (4 m F, .p
/• `. �S} �,.'a. 1 '''? �• . {:• ' st O C C •p C C Q1 7 '6
_ 0 t fir; y54J_ i -! �•''j n r�,,rjr ti .• �' I' ,J ;..' C17 O O'C O O
�� �� I ����� -�, �' �� - , ..r" �r J.• t/%;••rT,.1J t. �v+'� f� +� _; � j'`."!Yf`,v '•,,.' � •U U m U_ U_ Q3 C o a-6
h V r S+ l',J.�% I• i. Y �`' t O t_ O N °_ ^
ch rte+ (R ti a °o
>!�"'''r ^`• .. +�Y_.�''r ,'i, "Y e eel - �' } {�?'.,.• fik,, ,,r. 1 r y�,'X; L' '� L L (6 V as ~ Erna
jd.3. ,c" /� +_ 'f�'.,'. O C O 7 7
+H�y+ f�. r '' , qtl. s •r p�( A.' U -5 z 7 Z LL ♦ to E
ii; /- ([' s '' � }t � 't'- Yrs •. i' .f ✓. t '1;:'Y,yyy 1 e
i Yf ' \ ti. �I i 'f 4�'� Cpl. - ,' �� '' - Ev- `y ��: ',}�' i v;.•. �)•- �.�� "4
f. - .��' ice. >''� `a <t §�_, „ , ..i �'` r;' t � t;�.y � .�' Yf�� � }if',�- ���; rt, +t •.'!,� ��l•J' �a. i'ry � t- .�'
to -`�, - .. -+.;l rx•- 'KI�'.. ri r+�..`'�.r:.tk'r' ^�,: r td•.� {•:�'lh
W Jr ,f• t °�' -.�(� _ -�.- '.i ,1' �, ' -e. 7,... /.� y�;�\i,) - `4/�_•(�. [�-•.i�,y:, it , --.
_ - -- -- tr S ►. h t7 •.i #rl$..J ; rl i y'ji, r.1+1 (�,
-1 ¢ ,,:� `�l, .I. ;1- '•i,• r t. Y ,•:, •J•riv t '�J ���'_} {,.r } •' /�j ,��. ��� ?s,4 " -5.
^'�f.- y�3 •.1•% % . !� �� yy ,v' Yr � r�r~ t - � �i:, ,e. ''f� + .,�,r' r�i.�• k.� f_. .:�� �
" lt�J? _ ,..J i' -o nN, .E , !.' 1 �' 5'[r! =' ".t., /4,�. 1�.�i_ , v .v/ Fr -i•:. ti ) r �! u•�y �, �' ' J . d6 + • ' /
$.. ci':' ui 1 .r�. - .rr�- i✓`f.. Asr� t :7 t} _ .. �A" [ , r 4\
yy Y .��F. }
7' .� A;'y ,,✓5 Q < r .Itig- ,. ,.... F-. , r % r., rc / �.,,�'!''. � +� • r i ' { - t. � .'�^rtiC R tk
�. ,`.:yr'. - ry -.g ti� v.. -5 �.5! '/ .� fj °.:#. 'I . rt- •'tiri'. f �1k" , '`f�,.. W t. ? iF , /r S.`•' �, J ` ja . - {;:t '•,
dw
f �• r �, r�. ! :v�,y' r �rr J„ i + :� ti n�` F �F, 1 Z
�' Fa 'r` ,a.! 9.. - - i- � , .%: 'y' `I"' '' ,•� .�`'r.� / j...r .,f �.'Y' .�. ♦(�, ' ,].� � G /, qy.�•.. +.._ r . {��f
� •r 5 .I t; ��„ r . <i J. r�.` J. tY' JT � +Gri'L'. Y4 •C' .i� J, :q �ii �� � d�_�t'� Ys;.
�j' ,[ l r >w� • Y. �• , f .•t i . r• �, �. .,� 7 n �. {: �. r.� 1.
S. a•.-!!!r'�f �J, ''' W + f � �� }- `r; - ��'� Mo -'c� °r NiON W s .i,W F, ��� 'k' `p r v• - '� W .byi ± �'' �r•r
it1 ! j ✓!y> . f ' "X ,#a'! r t •'� ;'.s,` o � . 4FJ•' 'f ,3' i r ' V� k"
3i. ry -4 i r' N =r 4 p�tii r 1 1fl I
�' ,: tit . , r a 3'rA' ; S, .e: 'ti,. •° ° - �f�► -; / ,•. _c:.,.•�yr�•�7' - L.+Y 'l. . , .: ��.
1 ✓1 r W +t'.. �� �/ ,j��c4°rr -� .•Y} •`_YS a '. ') 'I ��• ir{W , R { 1 W t I
t ' • dr h,1,,•z;.i �Yy - C / S )1
'a' �'� s rC' Y rSraa r �•r5� � +, . +' t��y�, ./ .Y- �.t. a
i r• : >• ; `s31F ' .. �I` ..� 1, ?• .+ +..f•- 'A •� r f. "�-' .� +>f'�;..;t � �k, ••
- - - - � . f . ` !. .r ;11•i` .. t.,. �� �fI - / _ S • i � r. , y � .r•� � _ 1k � ' a��h���.is i %�" ' A�'f r . Jr 'r ' l
i i. %. �Saryr S'r "• $ f' } i I '+t r# r Jy�. k-''f1 ik K' t, lf'x`Y '. F 'r I r fr
Y' C M
t A p ,�r �G7' • ` r ttt����i!'tjf• t $.' G,i f a r .rK .+{ / tYlr -.i;' I .•t
?'a'+Tp.
MIN U - � ?� � j 'k ✓.�. n�'ya t�.a� -�` i`��sj;u.e}AT'+AJ i!?t LN,„)�'f ,•c��j,• � 'J , r.y�. i'}°. I
r �LL - -' rs` d �r�0`' ata.''ft�••h ', / , y�x+``•'f if
fir-1:
F• - E �• ., - J�`r• ' %�s ��►.• • +'- -y ti � `�f'•: 1+s `5 � %#',.rs !f - �- /.:. �`•`#e''rt\ •f
r:, }; .y J �{. J r ; �r �#j: < � .� 'ra _ .y� 'v' «r•. � HI. ,r,. �,.J r.,• r_• �•, ;r^• .If. .�.�. {tit .�f}
`i: ,ry,� f �r.,y• .i�rl, Y r ��. r }'- -F 'Sr! Vii; $` �j!�;f'._ .4;k.,"
}A , - S ' ' i' � _ . < , '{ � . / '/y Ali • `Q'" ' S '�'t� ��' � = ,' r J° �- t +
4• ti 421
Q.4 a rt t .s E - rf Jr .•, i' 4 #' !v -.�+ �'�! , Tr R�
i�Y 1 ti f:
- ,.• s-:' r 1 -'r .•s r ,,i'p+ .�, y 'i' :'�ti •,� +... y - a
5*ir, Z • ' `,'�R,�. :ti_sJS 5..'�. t, ',rtr�" .'f•.p �` t72
i:s= `- `� .r'• ? f' '� ��•- j� / // .:.R !.> .iyr���C.'� ,J-: ,✓1 s �;��.:� i �i . � tiJ•' � a4
_ f ti- ,.' i / /` ,i� r.. �•i,• -',r. Jk7 .�' / i� {:., < .4.� - ' "s•�(.y]r i is• — M
1 ,'V'; - i � ', �4, .i.. S.G �' �• � 4. •di _ Gr ..j +t i S -. � �,. J
"\. ''• . . .� �. �' • C^s �' a ,� ,�f � �' / ekr �,L'r ' �`4�� r ,� a' s r -. . 'Zf �', m
L d, r i 2 -• ,r -�� YY - , i... �- F '' 1+'r�, .L.• y�,, LL
�%, r�.''rµ. f'�i�;i� _ y " \�: � ir;•,!`,�� ;' • /sr, 1rr= l s','Ji.� t�� • {i4 _� ��r`.7� �yw�,'. _ _ +,�y:� �, � ._
rFr �.�s��, 1 �•}i}�'{'i: .1f• f' 1� /.- „ .'� r f� 1J i �, • Yi- l•'77 ��!
6y ^•y ..i."�j, "r >",bt'i�.�...j ��r;�;; -+ r. / Syr � �`r� / C.. � -i�� � t'� ►� K4; •
r•. � rj�r,- {, � r ,Y,x,1� ��J 7 .' %I � � r 7'r'': �. •�hr d�•rr•iiJ �.�5'}!
t' yr :ie• N':" �b:i �' r , rfi ���•: I:i'+;{,�• '+`Va'4.•J �� rR '7
i'. Yr •./�� ya r kf rns�'f��JfiAK 1_ r � �F %�'f �i� f �,l � r}..r. f�'!�Y'i - !� � ✓�.�•:
* 1 W Oyu{ f i
r I • t ,5r `.rY k
•ice' {k � +�s "`� r� �l'i •'�.1
TA
uj
�.�
i , r
i
a
d °
zU
a °Q
pV =;_o
c
r_, W rT
0

CD CD
v
� 4 c;
7r
WV c;
WOZ
wu CO IM
'41 - Ktg,,
OL
11.0 N o
.
R
S 1 -E
0 4) UL
00 CCU
L .4-
A IS,
0 C_ C
5 B
ca 0 0
l.
c 0 >
eMllz
EL
a T:
LL
WJJ
DOW
Ol
XW.-%
Ar
cr
.20 T
f tin
Z 0
C6 0
1, 1A 'r
4) -se
Fj'
I z A)e W
" L
ard
Cc CU
tNi,
R /r+�, y,.�. tr���` "r•Ry�[7i �1�'a I }'_ ` fI ; ;l\ O � X.,
A.7
"A
4V,
'01L 11 -lw 1/1 "t llw . ,
lop
- A., 0 w a
tk.l 1 r' /. sL4 ,,�, r 1 P� E;,kria fr r'�,
N
44
4g *�; —441.
A
r I xr: 4
J�
IK,

Appendix B
Jurisdictional Tables

ER08 -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
'CaW Q_d 0, 1l F Q+­h, Ar Clrni�ma anri Cnnrtc
SECTION 1
Feature
Perennlalfintermittent/Pand
Flags
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude*
Neuse Buffers
BCA1 a
Perennial -Neuse R
3scz/stz
304
142
35.70375125
- 78.48128182
Yes
„Perennial
r,.....
'
�.. ... ,. . .
SA1
3s
289
35.70792297
- 78.4606899 8
Yes
SA2
Perennial
3s xlst
477
35,70890999
- 78.46454864
Yes
SA3
Perennial
3str /s z
418
35.70831469
- 78,46905867
Yes
SA4
Intermittent
3stu
243
35.70483282
- 78,47241151
No
SA5
Intermittent
3stv
285
35.70405250
- 78.47329842
Yes
SA6
Intermittent
3stw
154
35.70407475
- 78.47304462
Yes
SA7
Perennial
3sty
238
35.70296665
- 78.47833051
Yes
SA8
Perennial
3s ph
110
35.70394956
- 78.48176197
Yes
SA9
Perennial
3scy
172
35.70494452
- 78.48480879
Yes
SA10
Intermittent
3scx
456
35.70396190
- 78.48660471
Yes
SA11
Perennial
3scyylsgaa
679
35,70355674
- 78.48880212
Yes
SA12
Perennial
3scw
288
35,70252791
- 78.48976269
No
SA13
Intermittent
3stz
71
35.70256191
- 78.47779950
No **
SA14a
Perennial
3s acts ad
1832
35.70451743
- 78.48633579
Yes
SA14b
Perennial
3s ad
1910
35.71324286
- 78.50546408
Yes
SA15
intermittent
3s ae
198
35.71417477
- 78.50646292
Yes
SA16
Perennial
3s gag
343
35.71729790
- 78.50742341
Yes
SA17
Intermittent
3s ah
151
35.71751032
- 78.50766227
No
SA18
Intermittent
3scb
266
35.72408370
- 78.50735533
Yes
SA19
Perennial
3scc
213
35.72598197
- 78.51359813
Yes
SA20
Intermittent
3s pa
96
35,72714841
- 78.51464154
Yes
SA21
Perennial
3sc
392
35,72843823
- 78.51508050
Yes
PA1
Pond
3sw c
nla
n/a
0.16
35.70402126
- 78,48165375
Yes
PA2
Pond
3swtz
n1a
n/a
0.10
35.70308204
- 78,47828556
Yes
Totals:
9279
SECTION 2
Feature
PerenniainntermittentMond
Flags
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude*
Neuse Buffers
BCB1a
Perennial - Walnut
3sta
404
54
35.75102098
- 78,5326923
Yes
�
S131
Intermittent
3s„d
40...,
35.73059162
- 78,5215467 8
Yes
S132
Perennial
3s a
203
35.73003527
- 78.52310740
Yes
S133
Perennial
3spg
168
35.73084949
- 78.52682603
Yes
S134
Perennial
357
35.73217004
- 78.52943879
Yes
SB5
Perennial
445
35.73277328
- 78.52961389
Yes
SB6
Intermittent
M3s'f
84
35.73299188
- 78.53015016
Yes
SB7
Perennial
266
35.73658647
- 78.52955299
Yes
SB8
Intermittent
323
35.74487458
- 78.52943050
Yes
SB9
Perennial
369
35.74665413
- 78.53040842
Yes
PB1
Pond
3sw a
n/a
n/a
0.20
35.73110317
- 78.51786947
No
PB2
Pond
3swpb
n/a
nla
0.21
35,72990145
- 78.52129123
Yes
Totals:
+2266
SECTION 3
Feature
PerenniaVintermittent/Pond
Flags
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude*
Neuse Buffers
BCC18
Perennial- Crabtree
4ska/s c
995
105
35.76840863
- 78.53997675
Yes
..
_....3
SC1
Perennial
2s f
505
5.75530804
- 78.53323475
No
SC2
Perennial
2s a
363
35.76078756
- 78.53944037
Yes
SC3
I Perennial
2sgb
100
35.76099753
- 78.53966313
No
Totals:
1
968
BC - Bridge Crossing
Latitude and Longitude are taken from GPS files.
SA13 (STZ) is Subject to Buffer Rules south of Old Baucom Road and Is NOT Subject north of Old Baucom Road
Table B -1. Project Study Area Streams and Ponds continues.
P:tPfoed5120681EftQ8 -140 Lanrr Neusel7caft RpPdraR T841B 6.3 Y2�ds, STREAId, 213f2010, 13:38 AAf, P.1S

ER08 -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
T�hla R -1 DrnEarf fifrrrfv Aram Aframmc mnrf Pnnrlc nnnftnupd
SECTION
4 HEDINGHAM
Feature
Parennial lntermlttentMond
Flags
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude*
Neuse Buffers
SD1
Perennial
1 s b
233
35.76838154
- 78.53952104
No
8132
Intermittent
1s a
133
35.77529907
- 78.53973576
Yes
8133
intermittent
Is b
136
35.77660941
- 78.53921848
No
SD4a
Intermittent
1s c
72
35,77833148
- 78.53874686
Yes
SD4b
Intermittent
1 s c
136
35.77862900
- 78.53878945
Yes
SD5
Intermittent
1s 2d
52
35.77910169
- 78.53848374
No
SD6a
Perennial
1s a
216
35.78131817
- 78.53770731
Yes
SD6b
Perennial
1s a
55
35.78135768
- 78.53777935
Yes
SD7
Intermittent
Is f
140
35.78486736
- 78.53771636
Yes
8D8
Perennial
Ispg
99
35.78569946
- 78.53723298
No
SD9
Perennial
Ista
130
35.79518651
- 78.54287190
Yes
SD10
Perennial
1stb
112
35.79581923
- 78.54269651
No
SDI1
Perennial
Isic
81
35.79663598
- 78.54234429
Yes
SD12
Intermittent
1std
124
35.80962522
- 78.53715843
Yes
8D13
Perennial
1scb
194
35.81390031
- 78.53773163
No
PD1
Pond
Imps
nla
nla
1 0.02
35.77694328
- 78.53981493
No
PD2
Pond
Iswta
nla
nra
1 0.02
35.79595540
- 78.54282316
No
PD3
Pond
1swpa
n/a
nIa
0.02
35,77694328
- 78.53961493
Yes
Totals:
1913
SECTION 5
Feature
PerennlallIntermlttentWond
Flags
Length (ft)'
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude*
Neuse Buffers
BCE18
Perennial - Neuse
Is ablsce
405
153
35.81757588
- 78.53954602
Yes
BCE20
Perennial - Neuse
2scc
297
157
35.83954032
- 78.53096531
Yes
BCE3a
Perennial - Neuse
2sccls
301
126
35.83855393
- 78.53127363
Yes
BCE40
Perennial - Neuse
2s z
459
137
35.88736078
- 78.53844210
Yes
SE1
Perennial
2s a
21
35.81961881
- 78.53805416
Yes
SE2
Perennial
2s b
131
35.82195818
- 78.53867903
Yes
SE3
Intermittent
2s c
290
35.82895527
- 78.53812853
Yes
SE4
Perennial
2s a
120
35.83013450
- 78.53221592
Yes
SE5
Perennial
2s pd
120
35.83051967
- 78.53248963
Yes
SE6
Perennial
2s f
92
35.83369371
- 78.53033363
Yes
SE7
Perennial
2sta
241
35.84481463
- 78.53095972
Yes
SE8
Perennial
2sce
132
35.84936598
- 78.53026482
Yes
SE9
Intermittent
2stb
239
35.85464349
- 78.5298201
No
SE10
Perennial
2ste
27
35.86571326
- 78.53052067
Yes
SE11
Perennial
2ste
264
35.87038929
- 78.53596935
Yes
SE12
Perennial
2stg
106
1
35.87085293
- 78.53624105
Yes
SE13
Perennial
2s a
121
35.87730683
- 78.53157359
No
PEI
Pond
2swta
n1a
nla
0.08
35.86542183
- 78.53049996
Yes
Totals:
1904
BC - Bridge Crossing
Latitude and Longitude are taken from GPS files.
Table 13-1. Project Study Area Streams and Ponds continues.
P!Pro;eCt;120oa,E.R08 -140 Laver NaL*ODraft RpMmft Table B-1 +2xla, STREAM, 2138910,11:38 AM. AJS

ER08 -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
'f., hl.. C A G -1 # Qin 4 Arco Q4-- and Onnric rnnn111dorl
SECTION
6 WALNUT CREEK
Feature
Perennial termittenVond
s
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude*
Neuse Buffers
BCF1a
Perennial - Walnut
459
45
35.75773686
- 78.57868603
Yes
p5sjc
777777
T777777
777777
7MF77777
SF1
Perennial
104
35.74768429
- 78.53934317
Yes
SF2
Perennial
412
35.74826711
- 78.54243998
No
SF3
Perennial
5stc
195
35.74989315
- 78.54446003
Yes
SF4
Intermittent
5std 1
269
35.74952829
- 78,54499639
Yes
SF5
Perennial
5s'f
116
35,76118743
- 78,58738527
Yes
SF6a
Perennial
5s ph
119
35.75187776
- 78.54818046
Yes
SF6b
Perennial
5s h2
56
35.75101542
- 78.54747803
Yes
SF6c
Perennial
5s
246
35.75320879
- 78.54849009
Yes
SF7
Perennial
58
396
3575290847
- 78.54857959
Yes
SF8a
Perennial
5s a
283
35,74923327
- 78.55802368
Yes
SF8b0
Perennial
5s a
933
35.74982983
- 78.55471345
Yes
SF9
Perennial
5s f
413
35.74996694
- 78.55544362
Yes
SF10a
Perennial
5s pd
509
35.74931263
- 78.55812391
Yes
SF10b
Perennial
5s pd
361
35.74931263
- 78.55812391
Yes
SF10c
Perennial
5s pd
49
35.74931263
- 78,55812391
Yes
SF11
Perennial
5s c
55
35.74989479
- 78,56055487
Yes
SF12a
Perennial
5s b
46
35.74852389
- 78.56295368
Yes
SF12b
Perennial
5s b
187
35.74852389
- 78.56295368
Yes
SF13
Perennial
5s pa
122
35,74860013
- 78.56389841
Yes
SF14a
Perennial
5ska
282
35,74811826
- 78.56740851
Yes
SF14b
Perennial
5ska
123
35.74811826
- 78.56740851
Yes
SF15
Perennial
5sgz
130
35.75053182
- 78.57199426
Yes
SF16a b
Perennial
5s w
130
35.75222179
- 78.57345064
Yes
SF16b
Perennial
5s w
149
35.75300084
- 78.57424296
Yes
SF17a
Perennial
5sgy
156
35.75323382
- 78.57459837
Yes
SF17b
Perennial
5sgy
490
35.75436491
- 78.57462593
Yes
SF17c
Perennial
5$ t
135
35.75506532
- 78.57376084
Yes
SF18
Perennial
5sgx
92
35.75458308
- 78.57622145
Yes
Totals:
6558
SECTION
7 CRABTREE CREEK
Feature
Perennialnntermiitent[Pond
Flags
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Area (ac)
Latitude*
Longitude`
Neuse Buffers
BCG1a
Perennial - Crabtree
s a
303
92
3577316305
- 78.54740834
Yes
BCG2"
Perennial - Crabtree
4sta/scb
506
90
35.77450011
- 78.54894767
Yes
BCG38
Perennial- Crabtree
4s'b
302
64
35.78936575
- 78.58946241
Yes
SG1
Perennial
4stb
259
35.77736347
- 78.55725317
Yes
SG2
Intermitent
ssta
53
35.78090798
- 78.56027791
Yes * **
SG3
Perennial
4stc
174
35,78308053
- 78,56534539
Yes
SG4
Intermittent
cscC
199
35.78348370
- 78,56616158
Yes
SG5
Intermittent
4std
203
35.78323673
- 78.57031561
Yes
SG6
Perennial
4s b
287
35.79045759
- 78.57807067
Yes
SG7
Perennial
4s'c
96
35.79045061
-78.577655151
Yes
SG8
Perennial
Cate .
11
35.79076673
-78.5858 3481
Yes
PG1
n/a
swga
n/a
n/a
0.82
35,77254244
- 78.54564275
Yes
Totals:
1
1282
BC - Bridge Crossing
Outer braid or oxbow of Walnut Creek
Latitude and longitude are taken from GPS files.
* ** NCDWQ designated feature SG2 (SSTA) ( was determined to be subject to Neuse River Buffers in 2008).
PAProec4sWGS0 ERM140 La rHeuserDtafl Rprdcaft Table BA+kxfs, STREAM, =n% il,'+SAM, AJS

ER08 -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
Tahle B -2- Proiect Study Area Wetlands
SECTION 1
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
WA1
3tp
<0.01
No
35.70898152
- 78.46501309
WA2
3tr
0.02
No
35.70799202
- 78.46888755
WA3
3tq
0.08
No
35.70719058
- 78.46910164
WA4
3tx
0.33
No
35.70469695
- 78.47242435
WA5
3ty
0.30
No
35.70292943
- 78.47676407
WA6
3tz
0.41
Yes
35.70338250
- 78.47870825
WA7
3 f
0.04
No
35.70430959
- 78.48120858
WA8
3cz
0.07
Yes **
35.70452781
- 78.48638159
WA9
3 ab -af
0.45
No
35.71239272
- 78.50396608
WA10
3tn
0.06
Yes **
35.72395580
- 78.50748070
WA11
3tf
0.09
No
35.72593233
- 78.51141265
WA12
3 a
0.12
Yes
35.72714489
- 78.51486111
WA13
3pb
0.10
No
35.72779420
- 78.51503585
Totals.
2.07
SECTION 2
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
W B 1
3 c
0.17
No
35.72888752
- 78.51546740
W132
32d
0.02
No
35.73099581
78.52696229
WB3
3 e
0.07
No
35.73141239
- 78.52769672
WB4
3td
0.12
Yes **
35.74500015
- 78.53014579
W135
3te
0.01
No
35.74584300
- 78.53000704
W136
3ta
0.35
No
35.74756610
- 78.53132499
WB7
3tb
0.01
No
35.74921857
- 78.53197993
WB8
3tc
0.08
No
35.74930888
- 78.53222867
WB9
Mitch
0.10
No
35.75056293
- 78.53272950
WB10
3jb
1.06
No
3575311683
- 78.53269769
Totals:
1.99
SECTION 3
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
WC1
2 a
0.16
No
35.76070071
- 78.54000759
WC2
2gb
0.63
No
35.76158113
- 78.54020303
WC3a
2gd
0.02
No
35.76354939
- 78.54058719
WC310
2gd
0.01
No
35.76354939
- 78.54058719
Totals:
0.82
* Latitude and Longitude are taken from GP5 files.
** Features not specifically reveiwed by NCDWQ. Features are depicted as streams on USGS and/or
soil mapping, but ESI flagged portions of the depicted feature as a wetland.
Table B -2, Project Study Area Wetlands continues.
P:1Pro ects120081ER08 -140 Lower Neuseloraft RpftdrafTeblo B- lids, WET, 21312010, 11:38 AM, AJS

ER08 -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
Table B -2. Project Study Area Wetlands continued.
SECTION
4 HEDINGHAM
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
WD1
1'e
1.07
No
35.76895917
- 78.53982341
WD2
1 pa
0.03
No
35.77536765
- 78.54024702
WD3
1pb
0.04
No
35.77688274
- 78.53951960
WD4
1 d
0.03
No
35.77726284
- 78.53936564
WD5
I c
0.25
No
35.77775921
- 78.53907775
WD6
1 e
0.09
No
35.77803437
- 78.53925373
WD7
1 f
0.28
No
35.77837496
- 78.53910034
WD8
1 g
0.02
No
35.77930391
- 78.53845391
WD9
1 h
0.01
No
35.78035461
- 78.53809210
WDIO
1 i
0.02
No
35.78156967
- 78.53825455
WDII
1 1
0.08
No
35.78702492
- 78.53667155
WD12
1 k
1.53
No
35.78882724
- 78.53614118
WD13
I pm
0.29
No
35.79069002
- 78.53693298
WD14a
1tb
X0.01
No
3579630463
- 78.54278076
WD14b
1tb
0.01
No
35.79630463
- 78.54278076
WD15a
1tc
0.28
No
35.79725001
- 78.54249368
WD15b
1 t
0.02
No
35.79725001
- 78.54249368
WD16
1teltd
2.63
Yes
35.79853986
- 78.54176391
WD17
1 t
0.15
No
35.80139678
- 78.53930614
WD18a
Ica
1.90
No
35.81559755
- 78.53869558
WD18b
1caltg
1.23
N
35.81329213
- 78.53567632
WD18c
1tg
0.21
No
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18d
1 tg
0.02
No
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18e
1tg
X0.01
No
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18f
1 t
0.02
No
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18g
Itg
0.19
No
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18h
1tg
0.32
No
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18i
1tg
1.11
Yes
35.80480027
- 78.53960127
WD18j
Itg
0.04
No
35.80480027
- 78,53960127
Totals:
11.87
* Latitude and Longitude are taken from GHS tiles.
Table B -2. Project Study Area Wetlands continues.
P,1PrnjeGs1200atiER08 -140 Lower N%j$MOran RptWraftTable B- 2.xls, WFT, 2/312010, 1 t38 AM, AJ8

EROB -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
Table B -2. Protect Studv Area Wetlands continued.
SECTION 5
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
WE1
2 c
0.15
No
35.81721275
- 78.53849086
WE2a
2p
0.38
No
35.81821211
- 78.53861982
WE2b
2 b
0.58
No
35.81821211
- 78.53861982
WE3
2 a
2.53
No
35.82196903
- 78.53859796
WE4
2 k
0.09
No
35.82386203
- 78.53909977
WE5
2 h
1.44
No
35.82594224
- 78.53848881
WE6a
2 l
0.21
No
35.82872289
- 78.53732028
WE6b
2 l
0.80
No
35.82872289
- 78.53732028
WE7
2 m
0.53
No
35.83009626
- 78.53171134
WE8
2 n
2.08
Yes
35.83373418
- 78.52966466
WE9
2pg
0.11
No
35.84188798
- 78.53159077
WE10
2pf
1.11
No
35.84118123
- 78.53173494
WE11
2ta
0.32
No
35.84129668
- 78.53159784
WE12
2cb
0.51
No
35.84874152
- 78.53074979
WE13
2tb
0.08
No
35.85092274
- 78.53075658
WE14a
2tc
0.53
No
35.85475568
- 78.53046394
WE14b
2tc
0.32
No
35.85475568
- 78.53046394
WE15
ltd
0.09
No
35.85790507
- 78.52903692
WE16
2te
0.06
No
35.86020437
- 78.52813275
WE17
2tf
0.02
No
35.86508285
- 78.53064561
WE18
2tg
0.06
No
35.86727876
- 78.53414094
WE19
2th
<0.01
No
35.87014400
- 78.53604536
WE20
2tl
0.39
No
35.87079144
- 78.53685822
WE21
2'a
0.03
No
35.87504666
- 78.53431897
WE22
2jb
0.70
No
35.87777760
- 78.53123565
WE23
2'c
0.02
No
35.87710906
- 78.53212761
WE24
2cd
0.04
No
35.88289829
- 78.53411050
WE25
2cc
0.44
No
35.88713071
- 78.53770992
Totals:
13.62
* Latitude and Longitude are taken from GP5 files.
Table B -2. Project Study Area Wetlands continues.
PAProjeot5120081ER08 -140 Lower NeuseTraR RpMraRTable B- 2.xls, WET, 2f3P2010, 11:38 AM, AJS

ER08 -140 - Lower Neuse Greenway
Tnhla R -9 PrniArf :S#ijdv Area Wetlands concluded
SECTION
6 WALNUT CREEK
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
WF1
5ga
0.04
No
35.74889495
- 78.53610126
WF2
5gb
0.12
No
35.74854279
- 78.53626690
WF3
5 c
0.15
No
35.74815255
- 78.53645091
WF4
5 d
0.12
No
35.74822013
- 78.53567313
WF5
5ge
0.12
Yes **
35.74757717
- 78.53702507
WF6
5gf /gg
0.18
Yes **
35.74745772
- 78.53949739
WF7
5gh
0.11
No
35.74801007
- 78.54213350
WF8
5gi1 a
0.26
No
35.74899005
- 78.54354768
WF9
5ja1'b
0.01
No
35.74964125
- 78.54336432
WHO
5talg'
0.08
Yes **
35.74954079
- 78.54545022
WF11
5jb -dlph, p
9.73
No
35.74962381
- 78.54401983
WF12
5 fl g
0.12
No
35.75032802
- 78.55523297
WF13
5 e
0.31
No
35.74983220
- 78.55593600
WF14
5 d
0.42
No
35.75044797
- 78.55685272
WF15
5spe15pc
2.29
No
35.74982983
- 78.55471645
WF16
5pa- c
11.50
No
35.74869238
- 78.54311817
WF17a
5ka /kb
3.98
No
35.74784928
- 78.56710118
WF17b
5kb
0.02
No
35.74771942
- 78.56768290
WF18
5ra
0.19
Yes **
35.75131627
- 78.57115231
WF19
5gl
0.47
No
35.75033909
- 78.57167493
WF20
5 nlgm
0.03
No
35.75257345
- 78.57382302
WF21
5go1 p
0.71
No
35.75416033
- 78.57459743
WF22a
5gtaa
0.02
No
35.75514853
- 78.57358777
WF22b
5gta
<0.01
No
35.75514853
- 78.57358777
WF23
5gq
0.10
No
35.75709507
- 78.57667655
WF24
5pk
0.03
No
35.75974871
- 78.58287318
WF25
5p]
1.42
No
35.76141826
- 78.58449572
WF26
5pn
<0A1
No
35.76214371
- 78.58788840
Totals:
32.53
SECTION
7 CRABTREE CREEK
Feature
Flags
Area (ac)
Potential Buffers
Latitude*
Longitude*
WG1
4te
0.18
Yes
35.77206286
- 78.54537025
WG2
4ta
0.01
No
35.77706332
- 78.55558347
WG3
4tb
0.12
No
35.77740377
- 78.55760615
WG4
wt
0.08
Yes * **
35.78081077
- 78.56065691
WG5
4tc
0.02
No
35.78340515
- 78.57101403
WG6
4'a
0.01
No
35.78252158
- 78.57427808
WG7
4jb
0.03
No
35.78701408
- 78.57769670
WG8
4'c
0.04
No
35.79079019
- 78.58168085
WG9
4jd
0.16
No
35.79223746
- 78.58842326
Totals:
0165
* Latitude and Longitude are taken from GPS rtes.
** Features not specifically revelwed by NCDWQ. Features are depicted as streams on USGS and/or
soil mapping, but ESI flagged portions of the depicted feature as a wetland.
* ** Feature was determined to be subject to Neuse River Riparian Buffers in 2008.
P:Tr*ieeis120081ER08 -140 Lower NeuseTraft RpMraflTable B -2-,a, WET, 2WO10, 11:38 AM, AJS

Appendix C
Correspondence

Iona L. Hauser, AICP
Stewart Engineering
260 Town Hall Drive — Suite C
Morrisville, NC 27560
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 18, 2006
Reference: The Upper Neuse Greenway Trail
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Dear Ms. Hauser:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H, Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
As per our phone conversation on August 15, 2006 and a Request for Comments dated
August 9, 2006 forwarded to the Raleigh Regional Office, you requested input on the proposed
eight -mile greenway trail, which will extend from the foot of the Falls Lake dam to the WRAL
Soccer Complex on Perry Creek Road. DWQ Raleigh Regional Office comments on the
proposed project are as follows:
1) All streams within the project corridor that are shown on either the most recent version of
the USGS topographic maps or the USDA Soil Survey of Wake County are subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. Greenway trails are considered an "Allowable"
activity within the buffers,
2) As we discussed, the intent of the project is to construct the greenway trail outside the 50-
foot riparian buffers where possible. DWQ requests that where the trail will be located
within the buffer, efforts should be made to site the trail within Zone 2 (outer 20 feet)
unless site conditions (topography, etc.) render this impractical..
3) Where the greenway trail is to cross tributaries, the crossings should be constructed as
near perpendicular as possible (between 75 and 105 degrees).
4) Stream and wetland crossings are subject to 401 Water Quality Certification
requirements. Please note that GC 3402 requires notification for any impacts to any
stream length within the Neuse River Basin unless the activities are listed as Exempt"
under the buffer rules. Since greenway trails are listed as "Allowable" written
notification to DWQ will be required.
5) Where stream crossings will involve bridges, buffer authorization will still be required.
401 Water Quality Certification will not be required for these crossings if no channel
impacts will occur.
Please note that additional comments may be made following review of Pre- Construction
Notifications, buffer authorization requests, or other permitting documents.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Intemet h2o.enr,state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled1l0% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
Customer Service
1- 877 - 623.6748
IV�hCarolina
Nahmally

Ms. Hauser
Page 2 of 2
2/2/2010
Please feel free to contact me at (919) 791 -4200 if you have any questions regarding this
proj ect.
Sincerely,
Eric W. Kulz
Environmental Specialist III
cc: DWQ/RRO Files
Central Files
DWQ Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
Ben Brown — City of Raleigh
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.ennstate.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Mon Employer -- 50% Recycled110% Past Consumer Paper
9 �(hCarolina
tttrrrtlljl

Appendix D
Data Forms
See Project CD

CeC2 CeD WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 49
�^
CeC2 Ce82 ' ��F ` APD O '' 1 ti I mn' - - -- - CeE32 - - CeD :' -.. _ - -- LoD (Joins sheet 39) 49
CeD 1 N G �� �° s �G c0 c� �<v.� — GA�3 LoC LoC o APC2 Wn WkE
� �� o f V o'� � CeC2 Me
CeC/ Ma Cm eD. GAG 0 CeC2 \ CeC2 / CeD CeC2 / CeC2 LoB Wo APB2 % WkE \ P�2 N
�/ zo ApD C C CeD
Ma LoC + WkE \ LoC
G %�' U CeC2 CeC2 CeB2 Ma WWE Me = APB2
Cn �
Cm r , Y CeC2.
�CRABTRE WkE ! CeD � it i LoC
WmE Cm CeB2 Cf
r LoD
CeC2 CeF Ce0 A D A Co �V Cm ��� V�wE � CeC CeB2 M
1 LoC
\e�, Cm � CeC2 AfA Cm ��_� ;'i CeC2 CeD !� � /_: CeB \ _ _ UC egg
J AgC2 i CeC2 CeC2
CeD - CeD CeC2. 8 �.
\GeF Cm ll Cm Ma A�D AgC2 LoC �� i e0 Wo
JI /
It CeD // r�/ AfA S\� CeC2 Ge CeF Bu VRo /,°sue. + PP APB ` � CeB2 CeC2
�G Gz0 Wh -
e CeB2 B AgC2 yCm APC 0
f CeC _ CeB2 \\ / WkE — ` Ma 0
CeC2 Me, z� LoD O� Me
CeD a 0
Ma Cm pQ �. i LoC
R o Geg / / _ WkE µE;. �L ° ''• Cm CeC2
� CeC2 .
CeB2 I / eF Cm AgB2 �a \' CeC2 g APC2
CeB j CeD F`' /� ° Ma 4 APC CeC CEB2
Z CeC2 Q Me
D,
CeC2
AfA ' <\ Cm WkE \ i APC2
Ce62
�.�CeD Ma
�; iCeD C "' ; Cm Me dpi} CeC2
B2
Ce CeC2
} �C
Ma r APB
CeC2 gL CeC2
-� .... Ge FaB2 Ma
Ma O AfA
FaB2 o ApD
Ma 70 / CeF APC2 Ma WkE —
Cm`.
CeC2 \ APC2
AfA Me °B V Cm Cm CeB2 APC2 J
CeC2
CeC2 CeC2 7
APC2 1, Ma LdD2
� �U `\ 401 AfA Wy CeB2 t
50
CeB2 Gam, APB2 o.lo CeC2 ADD
� I CeB2 CeC2 � � r,�•i ,� �� � I aB% �r " V CeB2 C+ �'�
l
u Au FaB2 Me
CeB2 O Me —...�
-- _
A
CeD �O t��i 1 �L q a ,�� a �eGL �A �oQ q;0
v CeC2 APC2 i { PQ ?. ftr Cm \\ \.. ¢ h
CeB2 CoEi% l f =- m Q i .' �\ Fa62 V� Me
c CeC2 y CP \ Au PC
CeC2 / ' `+ Fa B2 Cm ` GeG� CeC2 \ ' c
I
C O !i
0 Z! - O
�- ..� r ce APC2 C'.n, p
-- _ - E ' I- ` �' p � d'
' C A D W
RALEI -�, AfA Cm �
CeC2 CeD CeC2 � � r� d � _ �y��� p ��; � AfA : ��
;2 CeB2 T¢ '�, r APC2 Alrl,
? / MdB2 � �� CeD r.
\ APB2 v
1 Au a
FaB ii Cp � FaB2 °
3r o� C CIC3
\ F \ APB2 - ( b Ma 1 / CeC2 C ApD
AfA
Ce62 APC2. ��ERN Ma �� ° 64 APC2
g 1" CeC2 APC2 5 °G �i CP CIB3._ . o
t � 9eo'j.' O Cm ��., WmE CeC2
CeC2 ° �. �v I APB?
eB2 `'- CeB2 CeC2 U - \�
CeB2 CeB2 �C W.
Cm
e. �4 c ���A CeC2
\ CeC2 \ Me
CeC2 CeB2 �: _ L° 0
9 / v� �� ` AD
CeC2,
CeC2 -`'
Cm \ 'r A C2 CeD ; 4F
F \ CeD / p 4
ApUZ , CeC2 / \
---a— F ' APCZ \ cecz Cel PROPOSED Cl j
A C2 �(
-- �i7 q
�ep CeD �e Ma A� CeC2 Me ,� � Me �� APB2 Me Me GREENWAY Wrt \� Cm .<, 0
CeD \ _ /
w GeB2 0
,C2 �� Ma CeB2 U WkC
CeB2
PC2 I Ma eGp A PC2
CeC2 CeB2 CeD Ap62 Y LIONS PARK CIC3 �3 > \ Au
CeC2 I CD AfA
\ -
/ PAP A AC f
A jheC2 M1 Ma 0 0
CIE3 APB2 CeB2 0
CeB2 A 62 APC2
CeC2 o v
/
Ce82 CeD r WkE SF
Ce67 Cm CeC2 Cn o
AfA
' V
CeC2 % e F O �F / CC2 Z r
APCZ 0 0
CeB2 / CeC2 " � CeB2 I� \, A 0
Mari COW % CeB2
A
CeC2 mp Cm a CeC2 Ce62 CeB2 `
N eC2 CeC2 = �O ��' eC2 CIC3 ( CI CeC2 p �I C CP
CeB2 C C3 C
�_ _ CeC2 __G CeC2 Mca F� CeB2 \ Ce
M e
- -- - -- i_ CeC2 - - -- -- CeeZ APCZ, APB2 APB2 pu' WkE
-- --� 7p 50 - _ CIC3 -- -- - - _ - -- (Joins sheet 59)oD �

On /Wkl Cm (Joins sheet 40)
ti
N LoC
M. P WkE APC2
HeB2
ApB2
Ma
ti O �' APC2
PQ ApB2
w Al
CeC2 P?/
i LoD
°0 r CeC2
O -� APD
In
B2
Cm
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 50
- Wo Wo
ApB2 ApC2 Vti WkC WkE WkE WkE o ��C Ap V
\WkE LoC S� LoD 6 ti c Wm62 0 ��0 O 00 LW02 F
LOB WkC 4A `� / APC2 \ APB2 Q� o APB2 cm 3 iii \WmC2 ���
n • M, " WmP
- ApC2 �o \ LoC j o0 ) W WmC2 ``p
DuB2 " ( — . y .
Me \ .. � _ ` WE WkE, - Me y v,
APB ApB2 LoC Me _ LoD i C WkC ApC2 / / LoC Wn LOD <'`�►
/ ,WkE T �oG op DuC2 APC2 / WmC WmB2 WmC2 WmB2 WmC2
C2 v° LoB
ApC2
APC
" Me WkC p i % LoB o\ U
Wo
Me
- WkE
w 2
gi r WmC2 1
= -1
ApC2 __ _ -___ I A
-77 ApB2 ApB ! WkC
�Se
ApB2 ApC2 ApB2 LoC
APC �(\ LoC \ Low/ ApB2 - a� ApD� "v WmC2 '6 �/ c
pD ` 1 / , ( ---- \ /./ / .. I /; �-`�. ` S� \1 e i� WkE ii �/ y `'
V, l ! ApC2 Me Lo Gu' Wo nr o I LODE Wm82
O APC2 APC2 \\ LoC r WkkA s =
APC G �_ . -� Me APC2 LoC ApB2 _ o .. . 1
��LoD �� ApB r Du6 � �p i � � Co
APB2 — ApB21 V % ! LoC
oC o0 \ LoC Ap62 WkC oC \\
QV LoD L ApC2 APC2 / \\ Wo
P. APC2 APC2 P OG / .... _r APC2 APB2 \ \\ c Wo l i
A10 B2 DuB2 oti i\ ApC2 WkE
ApC2 \U ApC2
VR O WkC ApB2 _ LOB / \n PQ WkC / \ APB2 /LoD
DuC ✓ ApB ApB2 APC2 LoC j
DuB �.. ApC2 V - -- Wo
ApC2 - -- =.. __ ___
APB / g
APC _ �. .. APC2 / :WkC An(. <o HOC \ u• �� WkE
Wy APD — .. �` APC2 / -� R WkC ApC2 /
LoD w
ApB2 u LoD
� r P .: Lob 9 .. o � �, ! •�
APC2 ! pC2 AC2�
ApC2 �_ i ApC2 Lo L) / ApC2 A LOC -1� 1 I •:�
DuB Me L ApB ApQ2 Wo77 No WkE
v \\ 'V i APD
�p�� J G� . WkE ApB2 ApD / Wo
'I � ' CeD WY ` / LoC p i Wow
00
APB + / PQG LoC — . - — ._. ;PQ LoC t <oe
0 0.. - ....- / /
ApB2 Lo BLOC LoB Q� / \J • �.�,
� � qpp ApB2
ApB2
ApC2
A B
Y
o AAPC2 / ApC2
..fie: i LoD LoB / o L oC
WY
ApB2 LoC <� .
WAPv , � D
ApC2
M ApB2
ApC2
PB2 LoB Lob
LoDI .
++
WkE• % L oD
* n
ApB ApB2 LoC /' LoC LoC ! APC2 APD
' APB PROPOSED ` wkc
1 � Me ApC2 LoC
i
GREENWAY 2!' ApBZ
LoC --�� ApB2 M LOB ;' S�° /\ o -. LoD ,). WY
e AgB Nl8 �Wo i' ApB LoC e\ Wow
_
LO ApC2 A B 1 - LoC APD!
T1 f 1
LoC 'DuB2 DuB f Me P 1 ApCL / Lo6
V�rF �DuB LoB ���� P �Wo 1
faB2 PP' A B2 DuC Ilders- Grov =— - A C P APC pC2 — PD / AP C2
i
_ `.... WkE. -
Me ApB2 Ma PC2 —� y APC2] Co�' i Milb rnie A�
04 �2 P / A 62 �
Cm
is - A II
o / I ApC2
� I .
ApB2- �.� I
.� "APC2 <v LOB ..\ /Gu Wn \ LoD APD �t
( null2
t Q A
i S� LoB i "� PB � � t
WkE � _
I 1. . � APD Hhurc st LoC Me APB 2 Ma APC �i LoC�
1'A 1 ApC2 PPG ApB2 \ ApB2 WkE ApB2 APD i
` ApB LoD APD
� � Lob - „ ! Me APC ... DuC� � Wo � � _
ApC2 DuB WY ��C _ A C '+ WkC APB I'�� Annd
Ald LOB A �r hk�c�� P WkE �.
dli ApB APB P%
APC
B2 A LoB °G / LoD Lo PC2 �oO ` �j"
I I P WkE.'' ApC
VJO ( i A �� APB LOB
I oC APC2 APB Me
(LoB Wn/ €
1 WkC
z
A
Gu
AP
A
O
� , ,. • i , .. 1 I ni�✓ r o PC ApC2 ApC2 WkE
1 - - LoC LoD -
tn - - _
I .. AI�II 1 Mu 0
ApB - �, APB2 _...:� WY � l! t
I..c ApB oD L.B LoD Ro Fab µ LoC Cr"
(Jolnx 111861 60) '' �1 Ai)(,?/ �AiB2 - - - - --
APD

4l.F,
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 59
_ CIC3 (Joins sheet 49) Cp [�
- -- lJ �e -- � 'i-J CeC2 Cn CeC2 - -- CeC2 - -- — - - - -- -Jo A 8 oG - -
v ' CeB2 � ApC2 ApC2
` Cm CeB2 qA CIC3 CeB2 \ LoD C� t N
�[ CeD 1 CeC2 CeB2 CeB2
t vo
T',' c Q' C
4a CeB2 / v�G U CeC2 ApB2 ApC2
C163
CeC2 CeC2 LoC
c mrT Y C'PO• {I Cep APC2 / ( ��
' CeB2 \ CeC2 t J
l
r Ue c.eC> \ \ € r GyO� f eD GeF wo
ApC2
,. CeD - i t �� a F LoC -
L Ma v
CeC2
n PROPOSED o�
CeC2 crC7 L
L Id eC2 11 1.1 CeC2 GREENWAY ApD °� „
C c
1 i yr ICe6 { r
.. A Co CeC2 Cm
e� R' ":- -i'• 1r r+ ,
ate o y
4+i CeB2 iYN / A 82 %
P ApB2 WmC2
jj
a ApC2
•
EY i r i CeC2 �i, CeB2 ApB2 _ _ ' APC2 LwB2
ApB2
tPkp, + Gu Me wmC
If 1 . t � �.C2 �` Me Q X. WkE VLw62 Qry
*.`. a1 I�•� �,Iq F, CeC2 \ APC2 PQ V 1 APC2 Q
4 w r C + ;' \ • rr CeC2 P o A D
f ..� r .App
L X QQ ApD �a
CeC2 s " LoC
SOL
4.OL y� nr CeB2 T`, �- CeB2 ` WkC
• - ', CeC2
ME
Clarence - RALEIGH c c e
�N
T , > ' - fF` \ _ School ` \\ ApD
ApB2 O
Ap B
lull 3 82) CIC3 D CeC2 O
<r
ApC2
O/ ApC2 - N
U CeB
- CeC2 / + '� G0
r,•' > \ _ CeC2 m ApB2
Loci ¢
v vR Gu Oti U p o
G t , CIC3 �m v� Ge O % CeB2 ApD
R
t CeC2 CO EnB2
r A C, Ua Me
11t \ ( \ 3 CeF/ 2 Gu EnB2 / \
WV . CeB2 /
CeC2 CeB2 WmD2 CeF \ CeB2 Q Chu h
/Fd Cn Dd m� V0
p W
CIO CeC2 -P, C2 G _._ ,
o C7 \ ApC2 LoD °
ApC2 0
APC2 Cul ;2 CeC2
CeB2 \ '1
� � I
AP62 / t HeD y`, / LoD
t ¢/ CeC2 i CIC :1 2 ; QQ Cm CeC2 CeD CeC o
Ro
Ma n ° CIE3 4Vahiu� U �cG�C -----------------
- - l
' e Q Cm ----------- - -'CeC2 Me_t` LoD Me
Ma 1��; ApB2 o CeC2
We 7 / = - - -•
Ma Aplt Q - ApB2 LoC
o
Ce62 �� Vti j o FaB WC / Me
Q
Met) CeC2 Wo/ Ma11 t P� -. �, W. Ro Me ApB LoB AfA
Ro
ApB2 APB2 LoD Wo
- - LoD
Apfi \ ( Me WmE" x k v G� AfA Ro �I LoB Ro
\� l` '. \ Ma W \ v. CIC3 ApC2 4 WkE
3 Cn 90 �; v
62
c
�J C2 / -.
Ce
�_ �) s� ApC2,. APB Wo
WkE
Mn AfA / ADC d O t
rC i \ i. l i •.
W11 r ' d ry PP -_ J o
W„ APB2 A C2 WmE QQ °o
QJ fA " ApB2 Wo i/ p LoC LoB APB AIM? mE APB2 WmE SAPC2 LoC ApC2 „m _ Gu L
I p - - - - -- -C� Ap -
Joins sheet 69 - --
� .- '� PA;i �L1• APC2 PP PQG�Q�`L PQ�� APD i iz
ApU A C

60 WAKE COUN I I 111113TH CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 60 - — — —
CP (Joins sheet 50) D
-APB
r AfA G LoC \ 1c t o0 B n 1 / APC2 ! l / WkC ` -..
oD o Ro Loc
LoC q Wa6.
G APC2 P ! v oC Q + ; LoB ApD O Co v Goo
N LoC Cp ApC2 ApC2
i APB2 P ApC2 APB 9 00 AttN FaB
P WkE APB2
v t� ��. P ApB2 LoD p _ '\ i LoC vo ApC2 Wn WkE
�\` O APC2 ij ApB2
LoC
4
ApD ..... LOB ` Vi 0' APC2
W n`.
q ? v P LoC
DuB 1 LoC �\ ��
0 ApC2 ApC2 L ApB2
APB Vr WkE ApC2 PQ
APB2 APB LoB
ApC a APB �nC O /APC2 !O �\ w
� W
LaD aB
Ap
a, • vV:>,KE � _ -.- � APC2 .� ._- t n ApB2` v 1 CeD LoC / E.P
LoB
ApC2
A CC 2 I '•}' •
: — A E
IAL IIUSY Cp WkE �O C P ApB2 A P B DuC
" All APAC p B
APOC
o FaB2 0 W A`D W.
_
y -.
II LoC aC
or
Y`
\f
p LoB - A f _ ApB2 +3p
A 82 LoD -' EKE pC2 ` C D QQ WgA n ; WI
LoC oC \ / R TREE Cm vkE Ap !i ApC-, APn Cm Wac
C
�t
P
., o LoD
�Gti %CP APC /.
WkE APB D LY
AP12 ApB2 A D AP ApC2
.r LoC LoD AfA LoC APB ApB2 - - -i> \�9,`_ '..PQO , �- ApC2 WaB
2 \ Me 1 C� , ,p,, _ Lo8 LoC Wn
o
ApC A6r ApB -- APC2
t
82 V kE
W ApC2 APC7 DuB /- !J oRf- ApC2 - ApD WaA 10
rr
ApB2 ApC2 n ApB2 DuB2 t n,.i ApB2 WkC E c'ApC2
_ _ Cm
ti
°ApC2 _ Cm LOD Q LoD r j WkE ApD
Cm L
APB2 q
e _ Me LoC LoD, ¢ APB2 1 �� ;��j WkC APC2 Wa6 APC u�
GNkE -
LoD DuB
LoC G APC2 � �•�C APB2 ✓ PQ ,�
_Wks q u / QC' WkE Qo n F .. APC l 1 Wn v �aG APC2
Me, - \NKE P _ ApB2 a\� qo6 ` ApD �Wo
LoC - -- LoC LoC I APB `, NkE B c Wn
w' !off A
WkE. Me �' 1 �# ApC2 6, ApB2 WaB APC2 00 LoD
ro A ApC LoC LOG LoB
A
E
AOD pR
�F
WkE Me Me. LoC pPg 3 A D N Wo eoRROw Wo -
ApD �
a �LOC - DuC ,n ApC 'I ya �� tY i_L APp-
dr) Q Me ApDi. ��\ �. APC o ': O A PC2
6, �� A
Me APC2 _ j LoD C II APB __ - -a ApC 11! ApD _
WkE \ APC APC APB Ap82 / LoC WkE ApD .:
Me APB Q ( LoC 0 _\ ApC2
U / APD ApC2 z p
O Ma e \ w U Cm Cm
�t p Me ApC LoB r LOU / 94 C APD
ApC2 ( ✓ ✓kis a
LO ` Me LoD ` PROPOSED LoC / APC , ApD
LoD J\ 11 LOB N i
o oC i LoD WkE Cokesbur LOU o O CeC2 0 \ i
Me LoC hu c1, �VkE Me GREENWAY LoC v° � .WY WkE
I amd ¢7 LoC W'� %uhc, APC LoD ApC2 LoD AIW
U) McCC urc APB t1t' 1 ti / APB !on AfA LoD ApC DuB ApC?
r _ LoC Q �\ Cm oC
° ` t.•: LoC APC A B APC Q r Cl �Me Ap62 - / WkE I LoB
I LOD G ApC2 I� P c. o� LoC Gt
°o I oO �e P APC � � A 162 ,• � C - . - � ,r ApB2
ApC _ Cm
O LoC Me lute -• i °3 WkE A
i
'1 - I pf
. - - - -• - - - -- '' i ✓S� LoC APD• LoD ... '
1oG
i orthdalej APB APC ApB2 APB Loc Cm
O le enta „chool A ,� - % _ oG /, I �, .I. LoC Lob ! / WkE _ ApC2 `.
Lop - j� �i 1 APB2 Cn \ q
° _ -• LoC i APB LOB ; o I„t I ApC2 �o� \ LoB WKE Gc loD DuB ApB2 ✓ P
LoD
Me'
e % WkE LoB LoC APB2 LoC ` � ApC2 /,,6
C ApB2 � .i APg e Apt Me Gn..
� APB2 i
a LoD /
loC e � - - oft � -. � �, i ApB2 `
Nle Q Lou �� .�4. / , 4 r APC WkE Co 7
Q APB -N � LOB LOC
°o fA
ApC2 %- —' _ LoC o0 /.' Me uli APB WkE PQp2 n LoD gyp)
Wo �� ApB APB2 LOB --Bu - -�
SEWAGE ,_.( .._�' `
ApC ''v � ��� P LoD � --
w J. DISPOSAL PLANT APC2 ✓ Apt APC
/ WkE -. -_ Lo C APB N APB ' Wy
\ Ma � �oG v� r ✓Jy � -2� < APC2 -ApC \ �
o LoC LoB ( LOD
v 'Poi -FTe 1
P � t ' ApC2 o ApB2 C ApB2 oD o t
/
- Wkl
ApB Cn / ApB2
VaC2 1i1� Wo LoC
o VaB2 ;WkE ( WkE A C V o J Wn AfA
0 i � P / A PB APB k
°o LoC LOD 9 APC loC ^ 1 Cn Wy APB Cn APB
u Wy f9 DuC Lo B 1 Apf;2 .I ApB2
WY op Gu
ApB2 0 94 APB G I \
WmD2 E 1 LoC j O DuB Me LoC APB Cn QQ Me Me F -- PQ
ApC2 APB2 N� APB QVL APC \ 2 \k\ . Me WkE' �, APB2. Winft
o WOV, P o it' 1 -
� Ap2 LB pC2 ./ (,' l APB fi LoC APB2 PQ J LoC oc APII�` AfA q - _.,. WY C� �. ApC2 l+f \� /
(Joins sheet 70) — — - nnc

5 1 M
?, � STE
APPROVED JURISDICT ONAL DETERMINATION FOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B, DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Statc:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.77731° 14, Long. 78.55721° ;'
Universal Transverse Mercator: 720801E 396200IN
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River Basin/03020201
21 Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
El Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc..,) are associated with this action and are recorded. on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Q Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
El Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There PickZrs "navigable waters of the US." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
d Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
b Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ,rq "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
r
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWS
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN1Vs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area-
Non-wetland waters: 1501inear feet: 6width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.1 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
a For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally'
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

� w
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS i
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs, If the aquatic resource is a TNtiV, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section HI.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section M.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TN1V) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
.....................
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at Ieast seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
slip to Section M.D.4.
A wetiand that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbodya is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offslte. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size:'tek Ltsf
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: 46.4 inches
Average annual snowfall: 5.6 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through lick Lisf tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are (or lle " 0"`ss) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are i (or ss) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are (or (ess} aerial (straight) miles from RPAV.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: UT to Crabtree Creek.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
Nest.
3 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man - made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man - altered). Explain: Tributary is impounded and culverted under US 64.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 6 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 2' :_.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
E] Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /%cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable bed/banks.
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain: moderately well developed riffle /pool complexes.
Tributary geometry kel�trvely str W
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 -5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for Oeasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 2tl (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Perennial.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: ConMnel. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ><Jnlcno�vr. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
® the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition
® multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine
lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: ❑
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHIVM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHNVM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): corridor partially forested, >100 feet.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNNV that flow directly or indirectly into TNNV
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.Iacres
Wetland type. Explainmaturalized stormwater collection area.
Wetland quality. Explain:low.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Nan -TNW:
Flow is: ephemeral flo►?. Explain:
Surface flow is: Overland sheetfio
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: , nkno. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacenc y Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Wetlands are in close proximity to RPW ( <50 feet) with
ephemeral surface connection during high flow events.
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximi (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1(oraess river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1(or less) acrfal (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:Wetland to;:navrgaile waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 50 :100 yea floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water is cloudy, strormwater debris,
Identify specific pollutants, if known: wetland receives runoff from nearby highway.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. `Vetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas, Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species, Explain findings:
❑ Aquatichvildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetiand(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:l
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TN%V. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook, Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the MV?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
L Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section I11,1):
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Wetland 4TB is part of naturalized stormwater collection area that is close to 4STB. Surficial hydrologic connection
visible, but connection appears ephemeral in nature with connection only during high flow events..
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/AVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
El Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWa that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Stream 4STB has strong bed and bed, sediment sorting, and moderate riffle/pool complex development.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 150 linear feet 6 width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non- RPvVsg that flow directly or indirectly into TN-NVs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
El Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
[ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
EB Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RP1t', but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.1acres. '
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters ,9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
BSce Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instnictional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described In the Corps/EPA Rlemornndum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction FolloWng Rapanos

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet
Other non- wetiand waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands:
acres.
width (ft).
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
El Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SIVANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
El Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction, Explain:
El Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis ofjurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Q Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Nan - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
El Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Garner, NC 1 :24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Garner, NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodcctic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no, and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
[] Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

SCE W�d
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL ETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Statc:NC County /parish/borough: Wake City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.78024 ° l� Long. 78,5598218L .
Universal Transverse Mercator: 720557E 396232 IN
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River Basin/03020201
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc —) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
El Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
El Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There if "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
El Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ire "waters of the .U.S." within.Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. (Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U,S. in review area (check all that apply):
i
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Ful Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[j Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
�[ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
} Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 151inear feet: 2 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.01 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on 987 $lehnett> ion 3�It1 fuAl
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Nan - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) :3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

i
SECTION III. CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HI.A.1 and Section M.D.J. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a. TNW, complete Sections HI.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IH.B below,
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section 11I,D,2, If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary.with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IH.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 1P
Drainage area:'ickT =is
Average annual rainfall: 46.4 inches
Average annual snowfall: 5.6 inches
(fi) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through �, tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are U 2 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are �[ A aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are j[ (or iii aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
identify flow route to TNW5: UT to Crabtree Creek to Neuse River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
'West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man- altered). Explain: RPW impacted by sediment runoff from development.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 2 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes:
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Highly eroding banks..
Presence ofrun/riffle /pool complexes Explain: absent.
Tributary geometrytelatrvely strargh
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 -5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for Seasonal fioss?
Estimate average number of flow events in review are, year: WWI re_ater)
Describe flow regime: Intermittent.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: 'Confined,. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: iTnkn© Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHNW (check all indicators that apply):
• clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
• changes in the character of soil
® destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® sediment sorting
® Ieaf litter disturbed or washed away
® scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.r Explain:
If factors other than the OHNVM were used to determine
lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: R1
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film-, water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the 0I1WM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the 014NVM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): forested, >100 feet.
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:O.Olacres
Wetland type. Explain :forested.
Wetland quality. Explain:low.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: intermittent floe. Explain:
Surface flow is: Conine,
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Tnkndw.W Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity &lationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1-2 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are IM aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from. land to navjgalle
;4Yet water.
Estimate approximate Iocation of wetland as within the ye; r or less' floodplam.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: surface water absent in wetland.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species, Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis Ptck.. 4
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNN, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS3VETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
I. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
Q TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
p Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TN-Ws where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section I11.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Stream SSTA scored a 19 on the NCDWQ Stream Identification Form.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
0 Tributary waters: 15 Iinear feet2 width ($),
0. Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a MV, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands,
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above, Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
M Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: There are no non - jurisdictional areas between wetland and RPW.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.01acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPNV, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPNVs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
. Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional..Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C,
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional,
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED []INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):1°
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote #I 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
t0 Prior to asserting or declining C%VA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the CorpsIEPAMemorandum Regarding CWAAct Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width ($).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL IVATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the I987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SIVAVCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis ofjurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
El Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Q Lakes/ponds: acres.
El Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
El Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
[❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Raleigh East, NC 1:24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Raleigh East, NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA /FIRM maps:
[ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIO AL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County /parish/borough: Wake City:
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.78317" N, Long. 78.564880 �V;.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 720091E 3 96263 5N
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River Basin/03020201
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated. with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 'Ick is "navigable fvaters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
El Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There dire "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply)- t
`lNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Nan -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
El Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 200 linear feet: 4width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
r Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CNVA ANALYSIS
A. TN-Ns AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs, If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections HI.A.1 and 2
and Section IILD.L; otherwise, see Section M.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands; if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, ship to Section HI.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
slip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section 111,11.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section I11.113 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section HI.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size: k'1 4:09t
Drainage area: 11 P,ckLtst
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are ick Iisf river miles from 'TNW.
Project waters are rek Isist river miles from RPW.
Project waters are lcic LiS aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are ick I isi aerial (straight) miles from RPI,V.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Mote that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that appW::
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man - made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes:ck
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometryickLtsi
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for Ptck Lisf
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year-
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: tek Lrst, Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Explain findings;
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OMVM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHNVM? Explain:
If factors other than the OHW were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markingslcharacteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ne lateral extent of CNVA jurisdiction (check all that. apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHAVM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHIVM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor, Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type, Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Eck 6f. Explain:
Surface flow is: dick List
Characteristics
Subsurface flow: )P ci k Lisp. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity &lationshipl to TNW
Project wetlands are 0.46k,"!J­J river miles from TNW.
Project waters are'rckItisf aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:die. k 1<ast.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 1?ack?Lrst floodplain,
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis W"s
Approximatcly ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis,

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TXW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain .
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSAVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
ED Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Stream 4STC is a tributary with moderate flow, strong bed and bank, strong sinuosity, headcuts, and
strong riffle /pool complexes.
} Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
W Tributary waters: 200 linear feet 4 width (R).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft),
El Other non - wetland waters. acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
j Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
J Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
b Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
y Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA - STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):io
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
d from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
H A
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
"See Footnote # 1
'To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section 111.D.6 of the histructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the CorpslEPA Atemarondian Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
EJ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON- J[]RISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING }WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SJVANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non- jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
EJ Non - wetland waters (Le., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
El Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non- jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES,
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicanticonsultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s), Cite scale & quad name:Garner, NC 1 :24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey, Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Garner, NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/F1RMmaps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
tj Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous detennination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL ETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County /parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/iong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.7834° N , Long. 78.5662 0<
Universal Transverse Mercator: 1175 719970 3962656
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
tj Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
El Check if other sites (c.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
d
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination, Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION,
There 'ick'Lts "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RIIA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
Ther4ack-lls "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
I. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent watersx (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNNVs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into MVs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
VA Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 300 linear feet: 4 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based onstbhshedy ©HT
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
El Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
'Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS 7
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TN`Vs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNNV, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section fII.D.f. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section HI.D.I.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Welland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNPV) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapnnos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e, tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section HI.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IH.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section HI.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section 1H.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size: 2384 �quare anrle
Drainage area. 20 1acres
Average annual rainfall: 45 inches
Average annual snowfall: X10 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 4 5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are {or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 {or less aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Tributary SG3 to Crabtree Creek to Neuse River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st.
d Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
west.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man - made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: h feet
Average depth: 2 feet
Average side slopes: ss).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/ %cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: deeply incised.
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes Explain: none or rare.
Tributary geometry Mxf�vely.s"gi t
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 1 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for:�5e`asonal-flov'
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:112{
Describe flow regime: primarily stormwater and during high water table,
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is lscrate anti confine Characteristics: low flow Win incised channel.
Subsurface flow: if Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
® water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHIVM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the MW were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
[no lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: turbid due to suspended sediments.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHNVM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g,, flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): <100' width, approx. 80% canopy.
❑ 'Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TN%V
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:.
Wetland quality. Explain:.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries, Explain;
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is:rck List. Explain:
................
Surface flow is; picic i isf
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Plewsi. Explain findings:
..................:...
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TN W:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are rek lif river miles from TNW.
Project waters are lek i{s_ aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from Kw o.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the PUk,:Lis# floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis'rckLisf
Approximately ( } acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Filtration of sediment; nutrient uptake;
carbon sequestation; terrestrial wildlife habitat and forage; amphibian habitat.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TN-V.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in theRgpanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TN W?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY'):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNNVs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNV%Vs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: OHWM, deeply incised, moderate sinuosity, weak sediment sorting, score of 24 on NC -DWQ assessment form.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
W Tributary waters: 300 linear feet 4 width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNNVs.
j Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above, Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Direct hydrologic connect at surface; drainage pattern in wetlands leading to headcut at stream origin.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.5 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional,
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see I, below).
E. ISOLATED []INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): i°
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes,
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
El Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
$See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining C1VA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA llleurorandum Regarding CFVA Act Jurisdletlolt Following Rapanos

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL AVATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
El Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "S;VA11rCC," the review area would have been regulated based so. lei on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
El Other. (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non- wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report,
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh East, 1 :24K.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
j State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date).
Previous determination(s). File no, and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
S. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

[, y�S7SJ TG
APPROVED TURISDIC O AKIINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook,
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County /parishlborough: Wake City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.77171° 1, Long. 78.54682 0 .
Universal Transverse Mercator: 721756E 3961404N
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN1V) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River Basin/03020201
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There )'rckLrs "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (MIA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Q Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
El Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There rare "waters of the U.S. " within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U,S. in review area (check all that apply): i
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TN_Ws
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RP`Vs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 3001inear feet: 10 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.3 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on 198?= 7elrneaton Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waterslwet]ands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
= For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a MV and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months),
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS f s
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HI.A.1 and Section HI.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IH.A.I and 2
and Section M.D.I.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent";
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e, tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section M.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both, If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.11.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section M.0 below.
I. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNNV
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Peek List
Drainage area: tPrck I;rsi
Average annual rainfall: 46.4 inches
Average annual snowfall: 5.6 inches
(if) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through ftek i(tst tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are {or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are {or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 (or.1 ess) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 3 {'r_lew aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWs: UT to Neuse River to Neuse River.
Tributary stream order, if known: Ist.
# Note that the Instntctional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
' Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributgly Characteristics check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man- altered). Explain: Tributary is impounded upstream from study area.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 10 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: Vertreal(1 1 vr3ess),
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation, Type /% cover:
❑ Other, Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable bed/banks.
Presence of runfriffle /pool complexes Explain: moderately well developed riffle /pool complexes.
Tributary geometry 4e1afrvely siraigtt
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 -5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for Fick List
Estimate average number of flaw events in review area/year: ¢fl (or grQaferj
Describe flow regime: Perennial.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: confiner. Characteristics:
Subsurface flaw: Vnkn©". Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
®
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous 0H`VM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
EJ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): forested, >100 feet.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.3acres
Wetland type. Explainmaturalized stormwater collection area.
Wetland quality. Explain:low.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non- TN-%V:
Flow is: Flo Floes%.. Explain:
Surface flow is &i present
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: tlnkna.. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Wetlands are in close proximity to RPW (<50 feet).
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are (orless) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is fromYetland tonavigabte water. .
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the,' D 2D year floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water is cloudy.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: wetland receives runoff from nearby parking lots and roads.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ 'Vegetation typelpercent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings.
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetiand lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw. connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNNVs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecyele support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or Known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section I11.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Wetlands 4PA, 4PB, and VC are part of naturalized stormwater collection area that is close to RPW. No evidence
of surface connection is visible, but proximity indicates a discrete hydrologic connection.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSAVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Stream 4SPA has strong bed and bed, sediment sorting, and moderate riffle /pool complex development.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
N Tributary waters: 300 linear feet 10 width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres,
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a MV, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III,C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft),
] Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
El Netlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
EJ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
El Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III,D,2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TN`Ws.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.3acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III,C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
( Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)."
] which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
El from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
El Interstate isolated waters, Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
BSee Footnote # 3.
s To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IIID.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
" Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the CarpsIEPAR1erttorottdurri Regardlug CWA ActTrrrisdiedon FolfowingRapaxos

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
El Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SIYANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
El Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Q. Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
d Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
ti Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S, Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Garner, NC 1 :24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Gamcr, NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Gcodcctic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

5�6_ Lf S s -K
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form instructional Guidebook,
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake City Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.79027° A bong. 78.57808 0 .
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S 718878 39&3393
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Crabtree Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (IWC): 03020201
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
j Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. R14A SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Wc V' i "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There *re "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. IRequiredj
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (cheek all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into MVs
[] Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 150 linear feet: 4 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on stablrshed l'y OHY�
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters / wetlands (check if applicable) :3
El Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III,F,

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS 1
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section IH.D.I, only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III,B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW;
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under RapaDoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i,e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e,g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section HI.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offslte. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section M.0 below. .
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Nik List:
Drainage area: ts
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(il) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through �jck U4 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are tclt List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are rckList river miles from RPW.
Project waters are isi aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are rekL si aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW':
Tributary stream order, if known:
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW,

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: )Pack .4,
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence ofrun/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry Prck A
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for PI&I sf
Estimate average number of flaw events in review area/year :'rek List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Prck Ltsi. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: tick List. Explain findings:
E] Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHNVM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHLVM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list ):
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OMVM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TMV that flow directly or indirectly into TNNV
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick L(s: ,Explain;
Surface flow is: ? ck List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick J. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNGV
Project wetlands are 'ack Lis river miles from TNW.
Project waters areiek7i ist aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from'ic(iLis.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pieli Lis'f floodplain.
(11) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis pick .is
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? OM Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TN%V.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e,g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW), Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example.
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNIVs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above Iist of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs, Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TN%Vs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section 111.1):
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSAVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNNVs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: OHWM, continuous bed and bank, strong flow, strong sediment sorting.
El Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Z Tributary waters: 150 linear feet 4 width (ft).
[l Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
0 Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
El Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IIL13 and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
0 Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
El Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):1°
El which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
0 Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination;
'See Footnote # 3.
' To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining C1VA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA RQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CNAAct Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
El Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
El Wetlands:
acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SMANCC," the review area would have been regulated based so, Iely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply): '
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
El Lakes/ponds: acres.
Ell Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
El Non - wetland waters (i,e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
j Lakes/ponds: acres,
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
( U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh East, 1:24K,
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation :NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Raleigh East NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA /FIRM maps:
100 -year FloodpIain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JURISDICffOAL DETERMINATION FORM
U-.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER;
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: NVake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.79042 0 , Long. 78.577$4 0.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S 718900 3963409
Name ofnearestwaterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Crabtree Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
t4 Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
El Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
d Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RUA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 'ack Lash "navigable waters of the U.S" within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required)
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
El Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There t `L "waters of the U.S." within Clean' Vatcr Act (CNVA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
TNtVs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNAVs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN Vs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPNVs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 100 linear feet: 3 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c, Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: stf
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a'1NW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III . CWA ANALYSIS J;p,,�,
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TN_NV, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section 1111.13 below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional, If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
slip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (arid its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HI.B,3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size:'�ckLrs
Drainage area: P>ekLfs
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through �ick.tst tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are ickLis: river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are ickTisf aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are iCk Its aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man - made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered), Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: b ck L-W.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary conditionistability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes, Explain:
Tributary geometry f'rckLrsf
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for Pick Lts if
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: }ck j
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: !'tck Lts. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick 'J. Explain findings:
............. .
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHNVM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHVVM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: d
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ine lateral extent of CVVA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the 0IIWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the 0HWM that is unrelated to the Nvaterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ AquaticAvildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNNV
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
1Vettand type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: 'iek..st. Explain:
Surface flow is. P"si
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: P.ji O. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) 'Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by bermlbarrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are I?iek Lrsi river miles from TNW.
Project waters are P►ekI st 'acrial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:iek Lisf.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Fick- it floodplain.
(il) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., watercolor is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:'ielcisE
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? LYIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN Size (in acres]
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e,g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in theRapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSAVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY);
1. TN%Vs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: OHWM, continuous bed and bank, strong flow, strong sediment sorting.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flaw "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 100 linear feet 3 width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify types) of waters:
3. Non -RPWsB that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TN6V or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
..........
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
[ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
El Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
S. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TN'Ws.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
b. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
d Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
] Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] 'WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)-10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
' To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the CorpsIEPAMemorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurlsdiedon Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
El Wetlands:
acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "STVANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
El Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Nan - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft),
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh East, 1:24K.
USDA Natural Resources Consecution Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Raleigh East NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRTM maps:
100 -year Floodplain EIevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
El Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
0. Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL. COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD;

C gT&
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DE RMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook,
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County /parish/borough: Wake city:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.73024'N, Long. 78.52306° ,, V.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 724020E 3956858N
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River Basin/0302020I
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas istare available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offshe mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action.and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date;
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION H. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Prck Lisf "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RtIA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required)
Q Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: -
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There fir "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wctlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 200 linear feet: 15- 20width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
t
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on �987lleilneitlon_iliar ual
Elevation of established OHNVM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wet] ands (check if applicable) :3
IJ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
I Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section ]II.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TN%Vs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IH.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section HIM below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TN%Vs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.BA for
the tributary, Section HI.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1, Characteristics of non-TN-Ws that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size: PfckLis
Drainage area: �l?lek Ljsf
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through 'tek ItS tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are ick>Gis river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ick irs river miles from RPW.
Project waters are ick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are ick Iis aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
' plow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributga Characteristics check all that a 1 :
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man - made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: K kLis.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation, Type/'Yo cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability (e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of runfriffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry WtckLas(i
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for PickLrsi
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: �ickL
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick k.as. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: iek Lts:. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHAW (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
rj High Tide Line indicated by: ❑
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ine lateral extent of CNVA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(ill) Chemical Characteristics,
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
aA natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for;
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNFV that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: P f. Explain:
Surface flow is: tic gist
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: )ickhst. Explain findings:
El Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity &lationship, to MV
Project wetlands are 1 Jr k-Lrst river miles from TNW.
Project waters are �ick Lisf aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is fromiekLis>x,
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation typelpercent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for.
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fishlspawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis Fick Lrs
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? OM Size (in acres) Direct/ abuts? OM Size (in acres/
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNVY. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNVV.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNNV, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a fioodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TN V, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (i€ any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if an}), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the MV?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/VVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TN %Vs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
Q TNWs: linear feet width (fl), Or, acres.
. Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNVVs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Stream 3 SPE is a large tributary with strong bed and bank and strong riffle /pool complexes.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
El Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RM that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs,
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.8 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs-
El
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates far jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 111.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Q Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATIE I WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY.
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
- from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
*See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'0 Prior to asserting or declining CFVA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Follo3vingRapmtos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
El If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in " STVANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
El Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Nan - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
d Lakes/ponds: acres.
El Other non - wetland waters: . acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres,
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
}g[ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheeWdelineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NRD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HC1C maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Gamer, NC 1:24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Garner, NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

yqeq*jUtcl � vvC�I w � C DICTIO AI, D E INATI N F
U,S. Army Corps of Engineers
.4 cvz, *, v- -�
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County /parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (latllong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.771591 Yrcli asf, Long. 78.54469° I?iek Lrst.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S 721949 3961395
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNNV) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse 03020201
ED Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
EJ Field Determination, Date(s):
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RIIA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
�3
(4 j
There ire no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
El Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RP1Vs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 3.5 miles linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 3 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:1.9. S;
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
El Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
t Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
a For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary, that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
l '
A. TN-IVs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section HI.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IH.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ": .
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section HI.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody$ is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HI.B.1 for
the tributary, Section HI.B,2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IH.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section HI.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size: rek List
Drainage area:Ptekl,ist
Average annual rainfall: 46.4 inches
Average annual snowfall: 5.6 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through PrekList tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are (or less) river miles from TNW,
Project waters are (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1`(
or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are (or less)' aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Crabtree Creek flows into Neuse River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 3.
S Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
west,
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into MV.

(b) General Tributary . Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man - altered). Explain: Multiple road and utility crossings of Crabtree Creek.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 80 feet
Average depth: 6 feet
Average side slopes::1:.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Banks scoured of vegetation in many areas
due to high flow events.
Presence of run/riflle /pool complexes. Explain: Moderately well developed run/riffle /pool complexes throughout creek.
Tributary geometry:[lieandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 -5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for:�ckLtsi
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 2Q {or gre#4
Describe flow regime: Strongly perennial.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is Confine+],. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: PickT,sj. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
®
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
❑ sediment deposition
®
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHNVM.' Explain: .
If factors other than the OMVM were used to determine lateral extent of CwA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physicaI markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Tributary flows through highly urbanized watershed.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: General urban stormwater debris.
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHwM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHwM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). where there is a break in the OH4VM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spa= areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:3acres
Wetland type. Explain: Forested.
Wetland quality. Explain:Low to medium.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: intermlt'tent flii` . Explain: Adjacent wetlands Iocated in floodplain with surface connection during high flow
events..
Surface flow is;aek List
Characteristics: Surface flow present during high flow events.
Subsurface flow: , nk no}yt. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier; Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are w- river miles from TNW.
Project waters are (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from ketland tonav�galle waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the! year or Ies� floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Watershed is substantially urbanized environment.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: General urban stormwater debris.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply);
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width) : >50'.
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: b
Approximately ( 3 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifccycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TN Vs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Adjacent wetlands are located in the floodplain of Crabtree Creek providing a significant nexus with the RPW.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: miles linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Crabtree Creek is a named creek, with strong perennial flow, strong bed and bank.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
El Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
] Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: There are no non jurisdictional areas between abutting wetlands and RPW.
EJ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 1II.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 2acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 1acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
El Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
F. ISOLATED {INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] }WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :"
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
El from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
s To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
�0 Prior to asserting or declining CNVA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Menioranduni Regarding CFVA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (11).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
El Wetlands:
acres.
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SJVANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
El Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction, Explain:
El Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): Iinear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
© Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheeWdelineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad namc:Gamer ,NC 1:24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey, Citation:Wake County Soil Survey.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Gamer, NC.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMAIFIRM maps:
El 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
El Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

APPROVED JU DICTI NAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City:
Center coordinates of site ([at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.77220° 9 Long, 78.54521° NY.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 721900 E 396146 IN
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River Basin/03020201
Check if map /diagram of review= area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form, -
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
El Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
El Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A, RHA SECTION 10 DETERMIiNATION OF JURISDICTION.
There K LIA "navigable waters of the U.S," within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [ Requtred]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 751inear feet: 2 width (ft) and/or .2 acres.
Wetlands: 0.2 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNVV and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F,

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND EETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.AA and Section IiI.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections M.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section IH.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2, Wetland adjacent to TNVV
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section 111,19.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section 1II.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section I11.B.1 for
the tributary, Section HI '.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IH.B,3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section I11.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(I) General Area Conditions
Watershed size: NkLisf
Drainage area: [Pick M#
Average annual rainfall: 46.4 inches
Average annual snowfall: 5.6 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through ick Lis> tributaries before entering TNNV.
Project waters are (or iss) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (oraess) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are tl (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are i (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TN V5:
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional featu res generally and in the and
Nest.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TN1V.

(b) General Tribut Characteristics check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- aitcred). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: �ickLis.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometryrckLrs'
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides forekLts
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:ick Lisa
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Ick. 111A. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: k kL 0. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHGVM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OMVM were used to determine lateral extent of CNVA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lineslchanges in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
5A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OIBVM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break,
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity, Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNVV that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Weiland quality. Explaimlow.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries, Explain:
(b) General Flow. Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Yk M. Explain:
Surface flow is:'cck L�s>
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick Lsf. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity &Iationship to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are )'rck last aerial (straight) [Hiles from TNW,
Flow is fromrck Lisp.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 'icl Lrs. floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fishlspawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetlands) being considered in the cumulative analysis: X
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? ()IN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size in acres
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TMV.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and Its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all Its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW ?.
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TN%Vs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TN1Vs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSAVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
H. TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Stream 4STD(2) has strong bed and bank, a headcut at 4TE, and an upstream surface water which provides
seasonal flows.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 75 linear feet 2 width (ft),
Other non - wetland waters: 0.2acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: surface water impoundment.
3. Mon -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
] Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
A. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: There are no non jurisdictional areas between wetland and RPW.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.2acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs.
Q Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section I1LC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area-' acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
HUI Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U,S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
i' from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
'To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D,6 of the Instructional Guidebook,
1° Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described In the CorpsIEPAMemorandum Regarding CWA Actfurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
ED Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
EJ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements,
El Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "STVANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
. Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed. for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheetsidelineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Garner, NC 1:24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s): Cite name:Gamer, NC.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:.
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL. COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

4- -57-g
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -
�A
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: 4, Pg/09 4. Time of evaluation: A, Ai,
5. Name of stream: 1,)7' Gz agr",- 6. River basin: Alkj -S1-
7. Approximate drainage area: S. Stream order: Z
9. Length of reach evaluated: /00° 10. County:, �,.A?&
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.8723I2): Jr 777✓10 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 7g. 55'77-5
Method location determined {circle): GPS To o Ortho {Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
or NG G ¢ Anr� N�kiNv��.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): tJ�y rvCwnl
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: &,-ae-
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: - Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters ' ✓ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? EIS NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: A Z -0
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?--
ap NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial �fJ °/a Industrial % Agricultural
Z2- e/a Forested _% Cleared 1 Logged �-/.Other(
22. Bankfull width: 6 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): /
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) .Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) ,.Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic most be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): -f 3 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 4-/-Zk -- Date_ 2�25�dg
This channel evaluation form j intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.
1 SC, 1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
a
4
c 1?�resence of f[ow f persistent pools in stream
0 S
y `0 4 �
0 �5
1
z _._ {no f1o%v__oz saturation_ _ ,fl s�i'ong iloev ,--ma , x
Evidence_ofpast;hunianalterahon
extensive alteratton.. {l;:i o:alteration.= max pmts ._.
3
Riparian zone wr
no buffer; , 0, contiguous= wide buffer `iiiax oiitts)
, ?
�� r
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dk
F `F
- {extensive dischar es , ._0= no dischaarges max- pints , ,,:
ROAM �� ` .-
_ �
S
Groundwater discharge =
0
no dschar a = = =0, s rin s; °see s; iietlands etc:, max' oiiits
Presence of adjacent ftoodplain
�� 3
z rip flood lain 0; extensive flood lam ]i amts }k ` `
r -
PAZ
.�
� Entrenchmeatliloodplain access
0` S
�
fl� �` �
� 0 �2 ��
(deeply'eiitrenciied 0' fr `` ueiit #loodmg`':max`p'oiiitsj...'
5
�
/
Presence of adjacent {wetlands.
'e
�:'
no:�vetlands- -0' tar ad'aeent wetlands
9
Channel sinuosity
„=
0 5
,
Q 4
(extensive�channelization,,. 0'%- hd aI meander,, -max points
1Q�M
Sediment input z �;
S'yti
0 �4
Z
s
(exit 'nstved osii oii . © 3iate
11
rz $ize & diversity] of channel bed substrate
fl 4� r� '
Z
W-5
��;,s_._
`�
� Evidence pf channei incision ar widening "<
� � ?
'¢ `'�
�
� y
�
�13��
���'`� r' z .`
0 S�
,.., .;+I'resen�eofnia�arbankfailures
seveze.eroston,r. fl tip_erosion• stable,banlcs; =max
MA�0�,5���'�`��0`�5�����
a..
-
�lSy
Impact �y agriculture, livestock, or timber production
fl
ti� � �'`�;,
��,
�
K.. �� _ � -:' � '^ - _•,- 3. ""_ - ,. `::
S�
�
\.> \
'',�,v�
at)�'� t��=
��`'�"�R�` ¢3x3
//J
�
_- ��t-'�� -C�]`'
�".x
(/”
Presence of riffle pa ©]/ripple foal complexes
`
.,. no hffles /riw les oir. ools_, .;0; %yell= davclop cd, max pu mts
ittleor do Habitat- _(); fr geiity vanett fiabitafsouiis _
n
Canapycoverageaverstreambed "
t�
s.:.
"`pmts
fl 5�=
nasliadin ,ve etation_4 continuous caiid" max
substratembedde�ness
_ . de�".i cat *d ded
Presence of streaiii invertebrates (see page 4}
s
r" ���
20
` ' '$'
OWN -'-��
ft "w'.
no: evidence . 0, common fume ;pus es - maz?`:omis
�omts
common'iiurnerous es =max
_AQ Presence offish
4
}�.
"
22
Magi=
d
-
noeyidence.. 0 .coinmonFnumerous es =maX pmts
._.
r
23
t Evidence of wildhfe nse r
�a� `
ON --� 8--
�.
, ?'
z
;��;�� -zip evidence,;. Q; abundant o�ide>ice �riiax= aitits
� � � 6 �`�,:
E�`� � �
i �o sl
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
a

4 STA
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
FEUM STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET a��
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: �'.• i e,7-- Z,44{l N 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: /A f 4. Time of evaluation: x, X14,
5. Name of stream: sir C 4e&4-'-' 6. River basin: is'E
7. Approximate drainage area:.
8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ZC ' 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): XfOL C� Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): 795eOO l
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /018 Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): .rte
15. Recent weather conditions; G�,r it /V 4X,4 /�v V, V ,& z�
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES�q If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES. Ada' 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey ?<�& NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
/d-% Forested ;�5 % Cleared 1 Logged .5� % Other (_
22. Bankfuil width: Z ' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) ?S Gentlo (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 'Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (c.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Z Comments: T
Evaluator's Signature Date z J�
This channel evaluation form is int ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners alfd environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change- version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x26.
BIZ

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams,
f -e
�"�Y
��"'^"�- ."'^d...- .nom" ■!^� �1'L+-`t° Tie - :6 .^...°a _ r`
� �3�..�V _ �iJ -�1�5 .,.•u+ _
■/.�Y L
k �1::®
-. .r,
i {t (3��—
�. - --
liadmant
+
F.
�Iounfafu
2
Presence of flout / persistent pa ©Is �n stream ; 2
(no flour or saturatlbn 0, s#rong flow tnax porn #s)
Evidence ofpasthuman alteration �
. � �.(extez�s�v__e alte�'affon..TO, ng alie�`atioh, �,raax poui(s)
©_ 5 �
© b
0 4 f
f 0 5
0. 5 �"
�
0 5
�
1
�_;Y....
��
. , :
I.iiparian zone - � s
_ -.- , (no buffer ;0, eoiitiguous,:widehuffer ndax.pomts)_.
Evidence ofnutrtenf or chemacal discharges
_� {extehsive discharge "_s 0, no discharges { max po�.nts}
-
0 5
0 —4
,�
� Q �4�� �
f
� r
�
6
- � Graundwafersdiscliarge
(no discharge Li, spr�.ngs, seeps; ri+�tlsnds, eta" maxpo�nfs} '
Presence ofadiacentfloodplau►
0 `' 3 F
0 ` 4
0 ' �#
Z
._ :.
Entrenchmentff]oodplainaccess
....w� ideepiy eni�`enched_: 0, frequent fiood�ng _�nax painis) _.. ;'
0_�
_ _
©,_�
, .
�0.
g
10edunent
.'.,_.
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands 0, large adjacent wetlands max oints)
Lhannl smuosify
meander' max paints)
mpuf'
extensivedeposilfon 9 :lithe _or,no seduneni max points }_
&diversity of channeE lied substrate
(fine; homogenous -_a4, large; chverse saes max_p ©ints }__ '
a
A
l
_
0 = 4
._
0 5
CJ
12
Evidence of channel Wsmn or wxdenmg
a
s
�
s
Presence of mayor bankfailures
{severe erosiohR�O, no erasaor,, stablebank "s` maxpomts)
0
_
ZS1.7
,
f
���
�
�
TRoot depth and density on banks
{no visible roods 0, dense roo#s throughout max points)
s ,L
y
Impact by agriculture, iivesfockg or amber praducion
Q2,
/
a f +> Presence of rye poollr1pple peal complexes
(no riffleslripples or pools 0, well de�teIoped max points)
��
18
a Hablfat compleg�ty
(li#tle'ono habitat 0, frequenk, vaned hab� #its max points)
�'� `Canopy coverage�over stxeambed l � �
no shadm ive elation = Q coiit�nuous can =max ` orris }
0 b
0 - S ��
_
Q 6`
4
F 0 � 5 �
Run
0 b'
,
0 5 '��'
3
-
0
=Presence o €streaminvertebrates (see page 4)
�
��
Presence ofamphibians
_ {fioevtde�ice , -0, common, numerous.iypes - maxpoin#s)
Wo
x _c„
s(no evdenco, - - -0, common,numerous_types - m.pom #s)_._
r
O
23dence
=
of wildhfe use
,_ {�iaevldence 0 sbundant evidence max poinis)�__
�,
_
0 =O: aI
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams,
f -e

Norin Uarolina ulvision of Water Uuallty - 5lream Igentaicatlon corm; version :S. "I
Date: 1/29/2010 Project: LNG - Crabtree Creek Latitude: 35.78040N
IEvaluator: ES], T. Milam Site: SSTA Longitude: 78.56006W I
Total points:
Streams are at toast Intermittent if County: Wake Other:
­19 orperennial IF 1 99.5
A. Geomor holo subtotal = 10
Absent - ;
Weak
Moderaie
Sfrarig
1'. Continuous bed and bank
00
0 1
02
03
2. Sinuosity
00
1
Q 2
03
3. In- channel structure: riffle pool sequence
00
01
02
03
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
00
G 1
02
03
5. Active /relic floodplain
00
G 1
02
03
6. Depositional bars or benches
G) 0
() 1
02
03
7. Braided channel
G) 0
01
02
03
8. Recent alluvial deposits
00
01
(D 2
03
9 *. Natural levees
00
G 1
02
03
10. Headcuts
00
1
02
03
11. Grade controls
00
01
01.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway
00
0.5
01
01.6
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS
map or other documented evidence.
'1~' No = 0
Yes = 3
'Man -made dircnas are not rated; see discussions in manual
13 I-Ivrlrnlnew si Ihtntal = F F
14. Groundwater flowldischarge
00
01
(D 2
03
15. Water in channel and >48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel
- dry or growing season
00
01
02
03
16, Leaflitter
01.5
01
(D 0.5
00
17. Sediment on plants
00
00.6
1
01.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (wrack lines)
00
0.5
01
01.5
19. Hydric soils (redoxomorphic features) present?
0 No = 0
G) Yes = 1.5
C_ Rinlnnv suhfntal = 3
20 *. Fibrous roots in channel
03
02
(E) 1
00
21 *. Rooted plants in channel
03
C3 2
01
00
22. Crayfish
0 0
00.5
01
01.5
23. Bivalves
0 0
01
02
03
24. Fish
G) 0
00.6
01
01.5
25. Amphibians
(D 0
00.5
cc) 1
01.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
00.5
01
01.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyfon
0 0
01
1 02
03
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria /fungus
0
00.5
1 01
01.5
29 *. Wetland plants in streambed
0 FAC
FACW 0 OBL 0 SAV () Other
-nems;u -zi rocus on me presence or upiana plants, irem ea rocuses on vie presence or aquauu ur weuanu piarus
Votes:
5 �Z

W.JTG
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,,,F STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,f -
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: C0 OF FAL45JO 2. Evaluator's name: ��/
3. Date of evaluation 4. Time of evaluation: 119,111
5. Name of stream: Ear Geaar t 6. River basin: Al2 -W5,
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: /
9. Length of reach evaluated: A6-0 ` 10. County; 4%A��'
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35, 7gZ9 7 Longitude (ex. — 77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS ee Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 1A1JkN eu/N
15. Recent weather conditions: &41fR
16. Site conditions at time of visit: elVAZ
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters , Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? rte NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ClEff) NO
21. Estimated watershed land use; _% Residential % Commercial 3c -)% Industrial % Agricultural
°/o Forested % Cleared 1 Logged -"U % Other ( Aelm,.a y )
22. Bankfull width: 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 1/o) X Gentle (2 to 4 1/*) _Moderate (4 to 10Y Steep ( >I OV
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and. 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): :;5'% Comments:
Evaluator's Signature, ���^ Date
This channel evaluation form' is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and enviro mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.
1 CS (,-, �

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
-o
ele Qn
aun_a'
Presence of flaw ! pexs►Stent pools �n str'eaitt>
0 5Q
0 5 \
#low 0;
no or saluahan _ srong#los
k
Rrparian ilk
a.
"offer
t
h,_ no'buffer Ot conholis- vyideb
��b
�� Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
� �
�
,
,
4-$ � ��
o dtschar a 0s'rin s; see s,:we #lauds etc ,. max omts P,,
� Presence of adlacen�sf�oodplain� �
.������
��. d
_ 0 d,
z
Z
�; iio" flood `Ialn. 9,1Vexfenssve fl ©od lam . `3naX oitits
, 4
�-v
�
?��ntrezielamentfoadp[am
access
0 5
0
0 2,�
xenirenc�ed� „Ofre. ueutfloodmg -=max` oii�ts�FY�'
�- \
n
r e,__��_;
l
�� Presence of ad�acentyetlands
7��
��-•��
��;� no v�e�lab'ds -0 far a ad ace�� _wetlands = maz om�s
� ,
� . ?
Hk
��echent
mput�
\�
z
extetstve:d`e o�sztiori 0 ,I#tie orno:sednnent, ="max. pmts
.:�
�1
5�ze &divesiy of channel bedrsubstiae ' z�� ;
Y_
0 5' t
-�\�-
fu3e homo'` enous� MQ; lar e,.dverse saes max Dints �
�
*aY -�3
12r
�-�'� "� Evidence of chann�l incision or' wldening� . � a _
Saw
�-
x�
`
����•
,� -�_ >� : ��
� �����'� �'.���
�
���
�� �"�` �� "�Presenceofma7`orhankfa►lures� ����
�� � :�
�`�h }`
� �'���'� -'
se..�eze erastgn „1 {f,r na erosion sable "bans ,= max
5
�Roof deptl�iand d�nsify one hanl�s
�.�
'f
,11-IN
a oat dens # ou bout =max
U
Q 5,
Z-
ie 0` ; Dots omts03�
_ - mss. -__i - --
i `\`
:61
>gipac bagr�cultureivestock;orhmher production
��`�_
05
r
susanttal
mil?
im ac
? .:�
-Pre ence a riffles ool�rippl�' ooI com leges � �• :�, r�
�� ���� ����
�� '��=��
�� -�:
uo- �ffl�sln�'
�0 SIN
Habit Cam�I x►ty'€� HE
y
iosno fr
'haliita
�
\:Q� uet�aned iartasa�c amts
EM..,
- CanopFyycoverage}over stieamhed
0115 Can0m3
11:111:
w
(mgY g�IQL[�CIi nil ar. .
bSt�B
.�-
e
�0
Pr se ce go# ski eat in erebatessee °age;;
p
0 5
0
ti r
U
.;"..
o <eYtdence.r- QRMomm0 numerous, e -; n ax om
Me ettc�a�ap��
Z ^�- r`�j
s�i � �
common, numerous es -max am` , -
Prsf fis'
Cj
2
-
Sam ��;
d enc „ 6 co numerous es -max Dints
-.
2_
a
Z
'
ene (dnone=
ns
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AI ®# DWQ # Site 9 CSCC (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the folloiiing information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's naive: City of Raleigh 2. Evaluator's name: Charles Johnston
3. Date of evaluation: 12/14/09 4. Time of evaluation: 11;15 a,m,
5. Name of stream: UT to Neuse River 6. River basin: Neuse River
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: 1 St
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 LF 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (ii any): NIA
Latitude (ex.34_572312): 35,7834 Longitude(ec- 77.556611): -7$.5662
Method location determined (circle): GPS Cfo o Shee ho (Aerial) Photo-1G--M:, Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach sunder evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach soap identifying strewn(s) location)-,
Uqs #team rlaht bank of Crabtree Creek, aiDprox, 200 feet 5W of transfer station.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): unknown at this flme
15. Recent weather conditions: Ught roln within 24 hrs
16. Site conditions at time of visit: overcast
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 ,Tidal Waters Bssential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters X Nutrie.int Seiisitive Waters _�ltater Supply Watershed (I -1V)
I& Is there a pond or lake located upstream of tine evaluation point? YES 'O If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad neap? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 60 % Residential
10 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 3 -4`
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? "YES (:NW
20 % Con -a nercial 10 % Industrial —% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged ?lo Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X f lat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -) Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detenuining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic witlun the range shown for the ecoregion_ Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream. under review (e.g., tine stream #lotus from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate fonn used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach roust range between 0 and 100, tvitlr a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 34 Comments
Evaluator's Signature - - - Date 12/14/09
This channel evaluation formnis intended o be-u4d out.)- as a guide to assist landon -ner•s and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the Vn[ d States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
qualih•. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Forma subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
cscc
' These Charagteristies are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -,Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 12114/2009 Prol ct: Lower Neuse Greenway Latitude: 3518340
Evaluator: ESI - C. Johnston
Site: '--, CSCC Longitude: -
Total points:
Streams are at least Intermittenttt 24 County: ke Other:
�= 1d -nnra IM If � =qn
A. Geomorphology subtotal = 12.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Sfrong
1 *. Continuous bed and bank
00
01
02
(D 3
2. Sinuosity
00
01
0 2
03
3. In- channel structure: riffle pool sequence
00
G) 1
02
03
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
00
0 1
(F) 2
03
5. Active /relic floodplain
(D 0
01
02
03
6. Depositional bars or benches
00
01
0 2
03
7. Braided channel
0 0
01
02
03
8. Recent alluvial deposits
00
C) 1
02
03
9 *. Natural levees
(D 0
01
02
03
10. Headcuts
00
(2) 1
02
03
11. Grade controls
00
CD 0.5
01
01.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway
(D 0
00.5
01
01.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS
map or other documented evidence.
0 No = 0
0 Yes = 3
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see 0scussions in manuai
R Wve4rn1nnv aiihfntnl = R .r%
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
00
01
02
03
15. Water in channel and X48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel
- dry or growing season
00
01
0 2
03
16. Leaflitter
01.5
01
00.5
00
17. Sediment on plants
00
00.5
01
01.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (wrack lines)
00
G) 0.5
0 1
0 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoxomorphic features) present?
0 No = 0
0 Yes = 1.5
C_ A1ntnnv Stthfntal = A
20 *. Fibrous roots in channel
03
02
01
00
21 *. Rooted plants in channel
03
[} 2
01
00
22. Crayfish
(E) 0
0 0.5
01
01.5
23. Bivalves
G 0
01
02
03
24. Fish
00
00.5
01
01.5
25. Amphibians
() 0
00.5
01
01.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
G) 0
0 0.5
01
01.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
G 0
01
02
C) 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria /fungus
00
00,5
01
01.5
29 *. Wetland plants in streambed
0 FAC 0 FACW 0 OBL 0 SAV 0 Other
-items lu-ti Locus on the presence or upEarra plants, nem za rowses on ❑ e presenoa ur equam or vreuana pianos
Notes:
5

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name: 7—M, 1, Z'_ -S I
3. Date of evaluation; Z IZ6 A& 4. Time of evaluation: Pn�L
5. Name of stream: UT lzAarW�' 6. River basin: A lees
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 9040' 10. County: L►/Azt
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude {ex. 39.872312 }: K�% Longitude (ex. —77.556611)* R
Method location determined (circle): GPS o o S Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
6" XAZ"Il
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 0v,4Wo,"A1
15. Recent weather conditions: C«a
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES P0`5fyes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES (�o 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? C� NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential % Commercial ¢O % Industrial %Agricultural
,�% Forested % Cleared/ Logged Z7 % Other ( IV141zi-
22. Bankfull width: 9 '' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank); � /f
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (O to 2 %) ? Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to IO %a) ,_,Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends _ Frequent meander _Very sinuous _ Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section, Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): A4� __ _ Comments: '
Evaluator's Signature Date ZAfv-
This channel evaluation forrWfis intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners an environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.
1 5C-6

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSBEET
Boas a
# 'These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
Pe n Up
aun a'
1
� 4 Presence of flow , pers�stenf pools in streams
T
0: max.
1
no fiavv_or saturai�on_ siron flow, ouits
tiT
.
yam "
Evid�nca of past'human'alteratiop
,
�; \ 5
`�
'� 0•':.no'a7tei'ahon
�
oxtens�ye.aiYerat�on_ .:max Quits ...-
......7.,...
= �, . . .s . _.
: -.., -_ ,.:._
buffer P omts
� . rio ,0; conk€ ous '.Nv1OeL 0 uner�mFz max
`obits
R
�
<'
. extensv `discharges _tit3:nad�schargess,t'inax
-5
_
Q
. no °disphar ex -_0 ° s rin s ae s wet3dnds .e #e , max obhts
_.
HO
Own
ti presence of ad scent flood 1`a�n �t
i`
r�
'� mss'
OOextebst t8
ON-
OW
,
;.,
��' no flo °d lan - efioodlaw may? o�n °`z,
,
-
�,
INN
flooding
�
I
�. `.�.
,� . dee ly enfrenched;�,0, fre u�nf =:max points)
�.
r
g
n WetlandPr Rear '
o
ail acentsivet an�sasmaxinks
a
S Channel sinuosity
S Q 5
40
0� 3
/
rt,.,,- ";�
exteusvechannelization�4 ,= naiural_meandemax:pomts .
,,,
x
::
������ �� 3 Sediment�npuEr• �� -- �
� 0 5 ��
� � per` '��� {
� 0 ��4 �
�
�
�.
5�
gx
Size &diversity of channel bed snbstrate w
N5115
z
fineuhomogenous large d se
110
�0,; pe saes max o�nts =,
Y '
.. oe incised _ Offgtable'bed 8e`banks' . ir►ax Dints
Presence of maiobankfailures�_
"s' 51412'
{sre eroson£� ,0 no erosi© £,stable,bancs ,-
rt
1�
�' Roof depth skid density ort banks
!t�
oinks
�..�
��c-
�.�(no�1!�s�ble mo��,�•�dense foots fhXou bouts °mac v=
_:,�_... _
�,.�.__ .� ��. _
ml p t agriculture zlivestock or timber ductfo ?'
�t��
j
ai wfiai
',
. Presence. ofr� a oal%ri ale- aol com lexes..� ��
tilteQrno_.a
�R
NQ
z
t<, 0;_.. uen�`ane abitas�.max Dints
.�
1
Cann covers e`aver s red n>}ed a �
p
Y '
51 W
0
no sha yyegetatto._4_O�contrnuouscauo Qm .�
5,x
\- h. - .•. W `¢�� `.,� 14�\
$pbsa a erbeddednes
1
-
Q
�ded�..0�ioosa.iure
_ ee _ ,Em_c- -mac fee , .: �:__
._� >_..
.Presence of s ream nvei ebrates see page,,,, 4 z �
mom
4
_ no �vrdencr flcommon,:numeraus es -max omits E.M.
��
"� P esenco am hi6fan y
\
uu,evidence ,_0 ,common= numerpus es -.max .om�s ,. -,_
X22
-� Presetl a offis��
��
_.� ..
na evidence =, 0 coExion numerous es = max Dints
Evidence of ildl�fe use��-��
�'�
��
z
a
# 'These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 2/25/2009 Project: LNG - Crabtree Creek Latitude: 35.78308N
Evaluator: ESI, T. Milam Site: 4STD Longitude: 78.59095W
Total points: Count Wake Other:
Streams are at least Intermittent if 27 y
>=19 or perennial if a =30.
A. Geomorphology subtotal = 9
Absent '.
Weak
Moderate
S..iong
1 *. Continuous bed and bank
00
01
U 2
03
2. Sinuosity
00
01
2
03
3, In- channel structure: riffle pool sequence
00
01
02
03
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
00
0 1
02
03
5. Active /relic floodplain
G 0
01
02
03
6. Depositional bars or benches
G) 0
01
02
03
7. Braided channel
E' 0
01
02
03
8. Recent alluvial deposits
00
01
02
03
9 *. Natural levees
0 0
01
02
03
10. Headcuts
00
01
.* 2
03
11. Grade controls
00
0.5
01
01.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway
00
E) 0.5
01
01.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS
map or other documented evidence.
0 No = 0
0 Yes = 3
"Man -made ditches are not rated; see Macuss[ons In manual
R_ Hveirnlnrav suhtntnl = 7
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
00
01
0 2
03
5. Water Inchannel and >48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel
- dry or growing season
00
01
2
03
16. Leaflitter
01.5
01
0.5
00
17. Sediment on plants
00
t) 0.5
01
01.6
18. Organic debris lines or piles (wrack lines)
00
(D 0.5
01
01.5
19. Hydric soils (redoxomorphic features) present?
0 No = 0
(Dyes = 1.5
C_ Rinlnnv gnhfntn1 = 5
20 *. Fibrous roots in channel
03
02
01
00
21 *. Rooted plants in channel
03
2
01
C) 0
22. Crayfish
G) 0
00.5
01
01,5
23, Bivalves
C? 0
01
02
03
24. Fish
0 0
00.5
01
01.5
25. Amphibians
00
0.5
01
01.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
(D 0
00.5
01
01,5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
G' 0
01
02
03
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus
1 00
1 00.5
01
01.5
1291% Wetland plants in streambed
0 FAC ()
FACW 0 OBL 0 SAV Other
-terns zu•zi Locus on the presence or upiano pfarns, item za focuses on tna presence or equaic ur weuarw prate
40tes:

orb
USACE AID9 DWQ 4 Site #. 4SJB (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the follov%ing information for the stream Leach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: City of Raleigh 2. Evaluator=s name: Charles Johnston
3. Date of evaluation: 2/26/09 4. Time of evaluation: 12:15 P.m
5. Nance of stream: UT to Crabtree Creek 6. River basin: Neuse River
7. Approxitnata drainage area: S. Stream order: 1 st
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 LF 14. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
Lati €tide (ex. 34.872312): 35,79027 Longitude (es; - 77,555611): - 78.5780$
Method location determined (circle): GPS To o Sheet ho Aerial) Plioto,G Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach neap identifying stream(s) location):
confluences Crabtree Creek approx. 2,000 feet SE of intersection of New Bern Ave. and 1 -440
14. Proposed channel work (if any). unknown at this time
15. Recent weather conditions: light rain Within 48 hours
16. Site conditions at time of risit: artiall cloud
17. Identify any special water ay classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Troth Waters _,Outstanding Resource Haters X Nutrient Sensitive'[raters ZVater Supply Watershed (i-IV)
13. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evacuation point? YES (VC)-)If yes, estimate the water surface area-,
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (:M NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (M) NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 60 % Residential 20 % Commercial 10 % Industrial % Agricultural
10 % Forested % Cleared 1 Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 4 -10' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 -3'
24. Chantiel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 20) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >IQ %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Trequent meander ,,,_Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, eater 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e-g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more. continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 140, with a score o €100 representing a stream of the
highest. quality_
Total,Seore (from reverse): 44 Comments:.
Evaluator's Signature t - Date 2/26/09
This channel evaluation forth 's iu end to be used only as a guide to assist landoi -mars and envirownental professionals in
gathering the data required by the U tied States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting fi•orn the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Fonn subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -5441 x 26.
1 .V

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NVORKSHELT
4SJ6
* These �hk i*teristics are not assessed in coastal Streams.
S a
nn
rv�
r
n�'resn,encoloperssnpuius
iamb
4
Evideng p `humaII aI e a ou
�sz �"
- �..��•.� �E3[ASI�® �!dfl�n� 710 5��813�{iil � i2k7�G OIIIiS` mot-.
m� � a���;�y
-� � .�.r �
°r»�`
� �p � � :ter
� � �
2
��
,� ���•�'� -� �: .�, �� �
#1 � >
�,�� �
� �
�,.w�+ f°- '+``�S 3zS`i .`Z'�e.�.�', --. •.:..;,"•L, uw^'..%:.s^'.
EdeIICeiin #rent ar ctieinifit disces
'S"'....,i+a G,»«�''
�
�;`' e'�c�ive smear �s�Y�i�isc es mare o� .� �
p
...�� �,•.<�,��
a
x� ��
� �.� •.E_
2
RPy:..yT
tt`'�i`'FS^jJWj'y7�.v''+." '•.:�''%4,^- '-.v�°'°" =�.`M y
hnt ^� '�` %�rrQUIIi�Yf'a� T�5pC�1�i�E� � "^' }
�'"v' -r ,�/- "Xa -»?�vC
%'
"�, a`:a9''*.,��r',,,
--�,`
(��o-�
'Ai :[
0
•fl
at
,mot ', -..y ,'*'�"s ^'w�. • �" '. 1 :.:s✓ --?-`
� �Ft 'incg of ad,�ac ��tidplaur� �
-`.. - ,f`-rti
� � �� �
-k.n ,�' Vsr
�� � �-
--c
�. �� •'��
1
� -�,
� ,, �
�
p�'
�~� x . �
:��,�i` s
��6;���,
�� ��
� � ���-� �3a, �: ellcLinenf �'� odplain �c�c�s:'��;�, �•����
�.� -
�,• � bedA�fr uentflo�adui �� oinks ,<�
� .,����'�:
�,���
����',�,.�,�
7:
s
r�PE$eIIGO£[]0Ci1�SB�11[3
x
r
{S
yEyA
0
��
r nq�vetlantls_p,Iar z:adace.�t�yetds,�max, Dints
�rW�_,�
�.� `�
=�
=- �,
�
- �.� �--- ��Channel�nuas�'' �� ;� ��
r �-MKIN
z
eiSi::c#iam. " ". °izainii —fl naauralmeander .outs
a
�'.
`Q Cll�el SIWj' 0I�1I1IIeI1 SiII�£
_ _ x� �
..� � � dine, ]a�oTu�a �.ous „U, dare, �tVerse s>�s�u>a� oinis .��'
�� � �. •:
� -�?�,�
"^llJl
s -fly".
- �`s•�`i,��'�;,.�..�.M �C�,, '�y''•ra% .- ,.X
V,,.; -.
�?r :.,rr.3a
,--
2
.
r
PreseIIe of mayor #leak failui es
Rant depfti and den5i#y c�u beaks'
�„ :�:
, , 7l{? 3i151�716IOQt,S,Q „�IiS@ i�� �iTQli ,01�.„m 1i1�S .�ifi�5 �
:..�• p ,.. .:,�. �
� v- ,r.:_� -_rte• -.'
�- , ��' z
�c„,�r
ter-^ �.x � � � �'. � --✓ "�
x �e #b rII i7Cil�#UT#' �.ii�- S�C�111 �1I17�1 T �31#1d1iG�p11
Ya-..
s
-�-.
�X �v-
�'
511�15t�liti3l _ act � 710 eviC�enG+� li>aK ll1t5 `
� �
�°: >
grsemeefrrfIe- -gnat csmp eyes
�QnUr�p
pp”. rlf#leslix tes or noTs #i well devet ed n,ax oiilis_
Y
„ � -�,
zr 'sr ""s"r �""`�' � X°Yc �' ,r `Y.'ps�:.,aa. �� � ✓ ',,a � r• a'
-...c � �, "�•°•'
�„� -fir- ....�' •cg*.;< '�. -'.
� 5'.�x�' ✓ -
�,
�•��.;,�'
� ...ttle.�rn�l�a�aifat.��� ��_ ...�t;var�t�dabifats � n�nf� g
�_����•�;:�.v�:
.,..���..:�'
.�,f � �::
��A.O �laadul ve et$i1011 � cflIItlIIU8t1S 0 - -3118X ��111�5
`i9nUsrae
�inbedd�ecluess
Ole;
Q
2
.a.^.'b✓...
n:: ass, -..^"' ,�i"a""�'�`„ '• :.° i<,°"'sE:'".*a' ^^�+ ,"n. v"'�y`r .,z�z�.,z"" '%
PreseIICe�f SQ3n1 inY1 te}]i ae5 �SeB1�0� r
's "`.,
�_
K a
r Y
f
�.,
✓Tevj,. "fie'- _`''.:S.s'...,' vy -,.- -T 1Y_.wf -� zr'fb.°- ��_ +.�Y "� g.
`zf' Y.'_
•"'k' y'3n?
U
- _�,..r^
..`_'^,r`" f"✓c"'i";Y '`'fir
�. Vii(] ��TId�1C0 � �'QIIifCtO��lilt)1Bf�i1175 e5 717i�3C [lftl�$ �,
':.Y^" •$ y.
.-+.s ,y
r'�
k
PiSiIEE of ailib1�tldliS
r�'�
0
�
:; -�.,e mar r - •- ac- �,
'-? �...
r' a
-:
,fit
:.�
Ii0 evidence , QIIlil� 4i), li1II1BI Olin E5 iYi3)C DII1t5 .._..
._. --.
, a .. x x ,;
,.•"r
r .
.� �!aN
r
�"( =Z�'�
: �"^ vi'- vs3�= ^'?��+3''�.'"'S'�c @.s�;."r�T`�. z'id!_.'�.'v=.Xfi i �''.;""'." ''s"''. '"^'""�5 - .'
�1
'�S✓-?_.y ,�.�"`.
.�'v U'b^i"-,r=n'"J,.! "f,'S�'.
y
"^°,.a',,,�,�'a� /:
�
L5eIIC2
y' �� � �� "��i��s-"re.°.r��^s-.,.: � � -,
n
� V � �
n
l! ',� -'•t ."
'.�
s
.�.°a"G.^',G"'��:�
cammo nuu......
iin e;ndence,� � n,
may',
��,e�
jjAi
✓;
, y
y EvidEIICf4 of mldli% Rse
'l
3'�'d.,-.:r'..5 �?�w�',L, y:s..•`"4- .c?C'''r. x.A- nF £..>
_ �! ". ✓ -
Al : -3
NONE=
* These �hk i*teristics are not assessed in coastal Streams.

I USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # 4SJC (indicate on attached map) l
el STREANI QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,
Provide the folloning information for the stream reach tinder assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Clty of Ralel h 2. Evaluator's name: Charles Johnston
3. Date of evaluation: 2/26/09 4. Time of evaluation: 12 :30 p,m.
5. Name of stream: UT to Crabtree Creek 6. River basin: Neuse River
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: 1 st
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 LF 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if ktioNvn): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
Latitude(wL34_972312): 35.79042 Longitude(e-x,- 77.i3t611): - 78.57784
Method location determined (circle): GPS To o Siiee o Aerial) PlratalG Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach neap identifying stream(s) location):
flows to UT -SC B whlch confluences Crabtree Creels approx, 2,000 feet SE of Intersection of New Bern Ave. and 1 -440
14. Proposed channel work (if any): unknown at this time
15. Recent weather conditions: II ht roln withln 48 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: artlal cloud
17. Identify any special waterway classifications knowir _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters 2 Nutrient Sensitive Waters ttrater Supply iVatershed (I -1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream ofthe evaluation point? YES If yes, estimate the water sturface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (YES? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? CM) NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 60 % Residential 20 % Commercial 10 % Industrial ,_,°10 Agricultural
10 % Forested % Cleared f Logged °!o Other (_ )
22. Bankfiull width: 3 -5' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1-3'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 14 9/4) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, strezm classification, etc. Evgy characteristic -must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assn points
to each characteristic within the range shovin for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of holy to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
cotmment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e_g_, the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. Tice total score assigned to a stream reach must range beme-en 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score ( fronn reverse): 41 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 2/26109
This channel evaluation form s iutenr to be used only as a guide to assist landonners and euviromnental professionals in
gathering the data required by the ffnited States Army Corps of Engineers to snake a preliminarj= assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting fiVom the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement, Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -5441 x 26.
5C17

STREAM [QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
4sJe
�` Tliese'c" rfistics are not assessed in coastal streams. .
...
flT�tiSaeF' ` D. NN_ nfi i 1e�,.S..
ONE
��Eenee oflas li m ®R nkWI
Ube
1l
S;
�� a nsive alters on— Yio aite[a�on, max Dints
M
2
�s -" ' „rte';' -es' s�?'r'7.,�^'
RpliaII:z[ine �6'rtl
.a,..` .�,�,"*
II67i1ffCr f C[iAi 4115 nde buffe�rma?f oiIIt$
- -
�wr�
S
»,.'P' � i. +.'.;. .��+N�
�iS4[ence lie charges
,xR'�Li..Y' k��/.:
�+ yr'�".YYS°.Au'ZY K
�.- R '.
(1
2
�- ��
�2. -ar- @ iVII disctiar eS «z � Ilo (liSClial . , Silk
�Dc
0#�
1VS�3 1��{f3 ���s� r31�".L'»:�''�' %�"
�r �Jundf�i ei}}u�c�a3a ;c�
J' �t-H' � _
f/��
'may -v'" S-/
jj
'.Y
f}
max,
n�t3Pruigs seeps, wetia[itsetc p
1
PieseIICe nin[1 ac Al#l�d laui
r i +� P
f
En rmnc men iI ndplain cress
mo
61 W
i
��� �EE�ai1l- 4LV.. �.a"�.�.. � �.,.FF±Yi% �1111.� �
`-
"'^i�.
s._^�.�r"rvJ`"
"raa''T
..�x..�:. ,. �_ _�,....t�V��
'..zu?�^i„?°'i.6'{ :a,2'A"G^2 ✓. hK...1.f,: . -A
s Presence ofnd�ceuvetlan[s�
n'�✓���«^.N..�..�-
Z Jr" 1 y
"SIN r'Si - '��.,�':s'.
��
p.
Iar u etIantls max Hints,
�
X
`
nn �sreiY a ^ad scent
,... liannel Siniiasi .� � ��,�- ��,, ��. �
2F W.
4
�fj�,� -
��i..y,V
� �:.�.
c'y �wa112;
.� }`�j ^-� x ,.� �::
_:
j
1
y"«#"j�
m:"y
?m
Yr
✓
^. - �' '�3"5" � n33� :
nom. diment:;IItiu ���
:m" wX�,
�7+rw"
�,:'
exensx�redePc�si[ fnttleornoseune[isaaxpnmts)���:
IlZeeiiOil3niiei]edu�35����
: �,,� -
�Fresence of ina�ur li�IIk 1'ailiires � �
,r ;
b 5 {
� . SUS
3
=�M M
�.SBVeIP. �io5i4 S�$11Z� ��C�".:._�•.PS3llit5�
xr=�x ',
x
xw ,.s> ,� -'
-.� a
,-�. �-a
f"`'�"
,e .�Ii.s���%,_;la�..IF�T�351oi1a
S�""xi".!cY .:; Y".,°�- a?^ - »-':d: ". "�'3+^ -'^' ...�" ^E�' y.
%of eptli and densif inn lianl°
.,n y.; -��✓a . 7�x-E
,qr• -: ,',,, •c==- °.c,,�'`
Y M''�
3
43ense runs tlirnu 'haut aiIIts
nt� s161 ©roots Amax
��
a u
4
3p�`
grtcui�e,Inesoiirmberp
Presence Af r�ftlle- poallipple- psi cnmplese r
;
"s
R�,..�„ s;a' '�` °,,,>
r-„✓,, �,'
' �5�
a:�„�_ m- H; g.
-��`�-
�, {�
3
3� yHaiP1e13 r
8 o �iaa�i i_;_ li st 'VIIIifX lil t$ 1i1a7C 011ie
lj
a
ME
�%p
..
r
mob' rover e t d
I;`m
0
3
s18„
11Q fiat iii , €iIl COIIiY1lLiQliS AO ? ► m�XX 4iL# S
�
�s r�
.s
..
"J"M®R
I Imll .k"� "-T
aii�i$ ee[dedne55
✓
'.:�: .?".�a"' �i�^
Presence of ream �nrerieii�es see gage)
.r �p
x s
H �'u..«.�
�6��t'�iYfa�lF
�}
-
0
Q
a"3 .cr
MS°ISL+.:
i'"- )�f""p.�Vq�pw�»{'C ,d(x-:.'- J�fef�rrf^
lii%?ii��4�eGdbvn^.� cVilllJ lo�... iA�
)Y ✓
..uJ .,i.
32 Q
y^°"'i%
II�3_mjilaiiS�r
�y�t
.'��y
�r..
�' i'�
�'Y�`Y'�w u�"P"£�'.�K'�'�.�i. '�i i�'� '�-P'w= h:r����J� '?'i.Ji'�'��':R'.
�,'�^- fj✓'y,�`�.c^" �-
�.�'t�,"'" ��
i+i'az �[G ��°°-:
O
+r"
' �3 c�nnimnnanous_ ���,max arms �`
-�.. ���
��-�
� ��- ��
��
� no"'�ici�ce�
_�-;�•
Ism 1
41
�` Tliese'c" rfistics are not assessed in coastal streams. .
...

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) f
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name: av2R • t�l
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation: /-'41
5. Name of stream: U7p L 0A,3i7zCG Czc ,-A� 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: S. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: le Co 10. County: h/>axc
11. Site coordinates (if known); prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude {ex. 34.872312 }: '� 794 7-1 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet o (Aerial) Photol�a Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads -and- landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location ):
ZA, „osXGS�OrJ
14. Proposed channel work (if any): O F y✓
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: G��4
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES [fiDfyes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES lU 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 55 % Residential 90% Commercial �% Industrial % Agricultural
Z5_% Forested % Cleared 1 Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 6-s'
- s ' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): J
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity; Straight _�<_Oceaslonal bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: e- r.5 7-C
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form i intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and env ronmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.
s6-18

C,?
I�
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
t
ieImon__�..
funfam
�
,
...
Presence of flow !persistent pools in stream
� ``
� � � ��
Ev�'dence of past'Ituman'alteration
2
(
s Riparian zone : x>
0= 6
` Evidence of nutrient or chemical discliai`ges �" =
- �
� '"
(extensive discharges 0 ,no discharges �nax pouts}
� � s
�
"5
- Graundwafer d�scbarge
0 3
0 4
0 x
�4
6
Presence of adJacent,floadplaw
X,
_
�t
�(noiloodplatii O,exteiLSiveflocdplain maxpamts)
�:� -� �
,� ,� �-
r F
IFOR
Entreuchmentlfloodplan access
"
,
- (deeply enirenc�ied..,._Q „fzequenf Plodding_, maxp ©infs)
�
Presence of adfacent wetlands
�
� a
g
-_
� g
� 0 -�
. �
-,
(no wetlands.' 0, large ad�acent�vetlands max points)
Channel sinuosity �
0- 5
0 4 �
ineandermax poufs)_.;
--
t
w_
W - �e?enstve chanelizatton .�O,:riaiural
`�IQh
-:�__ h
� � Sediment inpuf
Fx
.__ {exfenszv depdsition _O,.lritle'orno_seil rent -naa povi s)_ .,
0 — 5
... . .... .. . ......
0 4�
F O — 4
P
� Size & drversi[y of chancel bed snbstrafe
'
'.
_ �... _.-
_� _(f`ine;Yhoiriogeiious, _0, large;_diversers�zes �maxpoinfs }___.
' ��
' { Evidence Of ChannCl lilClSion'Or vvldening
s dee l incised 0 _stable lied &hanks max oiiits
' _''
mom
_..
Presenceof mafor bank failures
{seyereFeroson 0, it © = erosion, stable banks -nax pos) ...:
0' S
-
ism
/
'�
14
aot de sth and dense on banks k
': � p h'
r
{no visible roots 0; dense roots throughout max pgints)
Tm Wt by agricullure, lives #ock, or'fimber production
-
T5
© 5
r�
0 4
0 5
3
�,:
� (subsfantiai impact 0, no ey�c�ence miaxp�b�n�:s}
� -
� �
E
'
Presence of rifle pool/ripple pool complexes
�
2
-�
r`' r Habitat complexity A
t
x`
-�
.�.��ho shading v�getatian - 0, continuous canopy max points}
�.0
�r ,
9 `x
�ftSutistrafe embeddedness
0 40�
p
�Preence ofstream inveebrates (seopage'9)
Presence of a mphihians ',
21
5
p- 4
0 Q
0 4
C>
Q
{no evidence 0, coznxuon, numerous Types max points}
,
x
� of iis1► � ' `
Fy
� -
� �n � �,��;
22 � .� �1Presence , ,�
-�' 0 4
0 4
.. w;: {no evdence,0, coi�vnon, numerous- typ poinis)
' Evidence of wildbfe use
0 6
0 5
b 5
f_
_= ,� ,� ,-- .(noreytdence .0 0 abundant evidences_ maac points}
_ ''
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
t

i USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) I
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: _
1. Applicant's name: L }AC 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation b q 4. Time of evaluation: L+.r
5. Name of stream: {�8600 6. River basin: l)
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: i 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any);
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3S.-77151 Longitude (ex. 77.556611): -78. Eq 'fb [
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other.
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: _
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: /Nutrient Section 10 Tidal Waters- Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES CO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (& NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? �& NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 4(>% Residential '40 % Commercial I % Industrial -% Agricultural
ZD % Forested �% Cleared / Logged % Other
j - i
22. Bankfull width: ` 7s- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 0/6) - Gentle (2 to 41K) Moderate (4 to 10 %) -Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the Worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream -reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. I
Total Score (from reverse): _ 6V . Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date '
This channel evaluation' rm is intended to be used y as a guide to assist landowners and environ ental profissionals in
gathering the data required by the United States AKny Corps of Engineers to make a preUminaq assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
z
FINA
2
5-
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TE
wet
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 3/4/2009
pplicant(Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? 1 Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significant) disturbed (atypical situation)? . ❑Yes D No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes F/I No
Data Point #: 4TE2
2. Chinese privet
Ligustrum sinense
shrub
FAC
VFCTFTATfON
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. river birch
Betula nigra
tree
FACW
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. Chinese privet
Ligustrum sinense
shrub
FAC
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. common greenbrier
Smilax rotundifolia
vine
FAC
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
4.
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
10.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
b.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 100%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
I:r•AD7:1i1KOWA
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 1"
Q Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: V
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
wG� �

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Chewacla soils
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: somewhat poorly drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
A uic Fluventic D strochre is
Wetland Hydrology Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes Q No
Hydric Soil Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -18"
10YR 412
l OYR 516
few /distinct
loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
P Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
ydrophytic Vegetation Present? 2 Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Datapoint is jurisdictional.
i

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TE
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 3/4/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI),TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? [—,/]yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significant[ disturbed atypical situation)? ❑Yes ❑ No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑ Yes 0 No
Data Point #: 4TE2
1. American sycamore
tree
FACW-
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. American sycamore
tree
FACW-
7.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Platanus occidentalis
Depth of Surface Water: n/a
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
2. American beech
tree
FACU
8.
-marks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
Fagus grandifolla
3. loblolly pine
tree
FAC
9.
Pinustaeda
4.. Chinese privet
shrub
FAC
10.
Ligustrum sinense
5. broomsedge
herb
FAC-
11.
- 4ndropogon virginicus
6.
12.
ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 60%
-marks The hydrophytie vegetation criterion has been met.
HYDROLOGY
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
� NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: n/a
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
-marks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
W 611

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Chewacla soils Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: somewhat poorly drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
A uic I"luventio D strochre is
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist)
Mottle Color
( Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -8"
10YR4/3
sandy loam
8 -18"
10YR 3/4
sandy loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes No
Hydric Sol l Present? ❑ Yes P No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TA
wet
ProjectlSite: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI),TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? � Ycs No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes ❑� No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes 0 No
Data Point #: 4TAI
2. river birch
Betula nigra
free
FACW
VFGF.TATInN
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRA'T'UM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. red maple
Acer rubrum
tree
FAC
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. river birch
Betula nigra
free
FACW
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. soft rush
Juncus effusus
herb
FACW+
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
4.
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
10.
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
5.
11.
6.
12.
ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 100%
remarks; The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
HYDR OT.f1Gv
❑RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
❑✓ NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 6i1
Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0"
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
\J(JZ

8OILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Chewacla soils
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: somewhat poorly drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
A uic Fluventic D strochre is
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes 0 No
Hydric Soil Present? El Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -I8"
IOYR 311
loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
ydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes [] No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? 0 Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? El Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE NVETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TA
up
Project/Site. LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes Q No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes M No
Data Point #: 4TAI
1. American beech
tree
FACU
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. American beech
tree
FACU
7.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Fagus grandifolia
Depth of Surface Water: nla
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
2. red maple
tree
FAC
8.
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
Acer rubrum
3. American holly
tree
FAC-
9.
Ilex opaca
4. honeysuckle
vine
FAC-
10.
Lonicera japonica
5. common greenbrier
vine
FAC
11.
Smilax rotund) olia
6.
12.
fft of dominant species that are OBL, FAC1V, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 40%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has not been met.
Ir \D C • !
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: nla
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
(:J �

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Chewacla soils Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: somewhat poorly drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
A uic Fluventic D strochre is
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes Q No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4"
I OYR 312
sandy loam
4 -18"
10YR 414
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes Q No
Hydric of Present? ❑ Yes D No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TB
wet
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? " Yes No
Community ID: successional
Is the site significant) disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑ Yes F,�/ No
Data Point #: 4TB2
2. cattail
Typha latifolia
herb
OBL
VF:CF:TATf0N
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. black willow
Salix ni ra
tree
OBL
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. cattail
Typha latifolia
herb
OBL
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. soft rush
Juncus effuses
herb
FACW+
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
4.
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
10.
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
6.
12.
ereent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding 1~AC -): 100%
emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 1'
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0"
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
\� 6,13

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase).
Mapped as Chewacla soils Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: somewhat poorly drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
A uic Fluventic D strochre is
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munseil Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -1$"
10YR 311
clay
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Q Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Q Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? D Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Q Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soi[ Present? ❑r Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE IVETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TB
UP
Project(Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? i Yes No
Communi ID: successional
Is the site significantly disturbed atypical situation)? ❑Yes No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes [2] No
Data Point #: 4T13 1
2. dog fennel
Eu atorium ca illi odium
herb
FACU
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. loblolly pine
Pinustaeda
shrub
FAC
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. dog fennel
Eu atorium ca illi odium
herb
FACU
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3, blackberry
Rubus betulifolius
herb
FAC
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
4. broomsedge
Andropogon virginicus
herb
FAC-
10.
E;� The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
S.
it,
6.
12.
ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 50%
emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
HYDROLOGY
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
Q NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: n1a
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
E;� The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
�G13

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Chewacla soils Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: somewhat poorly drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
A uic Eluventic D strochxe is
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes 0 No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist)
Mottle Color
( Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4"
10YR 312
sandy loam
448"
10YR 414
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 0 Yes [❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes Q No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Hydne Soil Present? ❑ Yes El No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
WT
wet
ProjectiSite: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 1/29/2010
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), T. Milam
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? nyes / No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes R] No
Heavy sediment deposition.
Data Point #: WT4
1. sweetgum
tree
FAC+
W RTATIfNN
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
Q Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. sweetgum
tree
FAC+
7.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Liquidambar styraciva
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >181,
2. Chinese privet
shrub
FAC
8.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
Ligustrum sinense
3. microstegium
herb
FAC+
9.
Microstegium vimineum
4.
#N /A
#N /A
10.
#N 1,4
5.
#NIA
#NIA
I1.
#N /A
6.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 100%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
IRA 0 • • M
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
Q Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
Q Sediment Deposits
[] Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >181,
❑ FAC Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
VV

W611 y
WT
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Appling sandy loam
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Ha ludults
Wetland Hydrology Present? Q Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? F] Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -8
l OYR 4f2
I OYR 616
common/distinct
silty clay loam
848
IOYR 512
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sul %dic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WRTi.AM) DETF,RMWATION
ydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑� Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Q Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? F] Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
WT
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 1/29/2010
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (.ESI), T. Milam
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? P Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑ Yes R No
it
Data Point #; WT4
2. swcctgum
Liquidambar styracijUa
tree
FACE-
MAWC191 WIN INOl
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. American beech
Fagus grandifolia
tree
FACU
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. swcctgum
Liquidambar styracijUa
tree
FACE-
8,
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. American holly
Rex o aca var. opaca
shrub
FAG
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
4. Chinese privet
Ligustrum sinense
shrub
FAC
10.
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
5.
11,
6.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 50%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has not been met.
TuYDROT.t7GY
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
wfi�

q0 TIR
AM
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Appling sandy loam
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP).
Typic Ha ludults
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? ❑ Yes Q No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -6
10YR 313
silt loam
6 -18
10YR 414
silt loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfdic Odor
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
WRTLAND T)PYR.RM- MATTnN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? [D Yes [] No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Hydric Soil Present? ❑ Yes Q No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional.
4
i � r

17w7TXi
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TC
wet
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes Q No
Data Point #: 4TC2
2. musclewood
Ca?pinus caroliniana
tree
FAC
►aCNINF11 rr*]L41
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. red maple
,4cer rubrum
tree
FAC
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. musclewood
Ca?pinus caroliniana
tree
FAC
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. Chinese privet
Li usirum sinense
shrub
FAC
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12"
4.
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
10.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
5.
11.
b.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAG): 100%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
I0.VA61 NQ 96TWA
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
Q Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
R1 Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
W �I

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Faceville sandy loam
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Paleudults
Wetland Hydrology Present? R1 Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? Q Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -611
10YR 4/4
sandy loam
6 -18"
10YR 3/1
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? El Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? R1 Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? Q Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.
O
t
�z',��

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
f 1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4TC
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), TM
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes 0 No
Data Point #: 4TC 1
1. loblolly pine
tree
FAC
VA061111I79I to] 1
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. loblolly pine
tree
FAC
7.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Pinus taeda
Depth of Surface Water: nla
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >1 SO
2. eastern red cedar
tree
FACU-
8.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
Juniperus virginiana
3. red maple
tree
FAC
9.
Acer rubrum
4. Chinese privet
shrub
FAC
10.
Ligustrum sinense
5. honeysuckle
vine
FAC-
11.
Lonicera japonica
6.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 60%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
16.VA11'To7WMA
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND ITYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth of Surface Water: nla
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >1 SO
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
Wc-, .5

SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Faceville sandy loam Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
T is Paleudults
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes ❑� No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4"
IQYR 314
sandy loam
4-18"
10YR 413
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes [�l No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes F-11 No
dric Soil Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Remarks: Datapoint is not jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4JA
wet
Project/Site. LNG - Poole Rd. South
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.Johnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? [Z Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes R] Na
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes [A No
Data Point 4: 4JA
1. American sycamore
tree
FACW-
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
❑� Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. American sycamore
tree
FACW-
7. honeysuckle
tree
FAC -
Platanus occidentalis
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
Water- Stained Leaves
Lonicera japonica
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10+'
2. Sedges
herb
FAC
8.
Remarks; The hydrologic criterion has been met.
Carer spp.
3. common greenbrier
vine
FAC
9.
Smilax rotundifolia
4. ironwood
tree
FAC
10,
Carpinus caroliniona
5. blackberry
herb
FAC
11.
Rubus betulifolius
6. sweetgum
tree
I FAC+
112.
Liquidambar styraciva
ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAG): 86%
emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
. Ni�i5:T9Tff@-1T
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑� Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
❑� NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10+'
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: V
Remarks; The hydrologic criterion has been met.
Wpb

SOILS
UA
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy loam Series
Is this Sampling Point
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udiflueents
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes 0 No
ydrie Solt Present? Q Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -2
10YR 4/3
IOYR 611
few /distinct
clay loam
2 -18
10YR 511
l OYR 7/1
common/distinct
clay loam
2,5YR 5/6
common/distinct
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WRTLAND DETERMWATTON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Q Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
ydrie Solt Present? Q Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.
h

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4JA
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.Johnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed atypical situation)? ❑ Yes Q No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
[—]Yes F/] No
Data Point #: 4JA
2. flowering dogwood
Cormis florida
shrub
FACU
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. American beech
Fagus grandifolia
tree
FACU
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. flowering dogwood
Cormis florida
shrub
FACU
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. American holly
11" o aca var. opaca
shrub
FAC-
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
4.
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
10.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
5.
11.
6.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 0%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has not been met.
HYDROLOGY
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC- Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >181,
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
►,LEI

SOILS
4JA
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy loam Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udifluvents
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4
1 O YR 3/4
silty loam
4 -18
IOYR 5/4
silty clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Lots Chroma
❑ CoIor
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes Q No
Hydric Soil Present? ❑ Yes 21 No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4JB
wet
Project/Site: LNG -Poole Rd, South
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner. City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.Johnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? r/1 Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significant) disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes P/1 No
Data Point #: 4JB
1. American sycamore
tree
1~ACW-
ku- crel21 WIN Ire-kiI
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. American sycamore
tree
1~ACW-
7. honeysuckle
tree
FAC -
Platanus occidentalis
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
E] Water- Stained Leaves
Lonicera 'a onica
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10"
2. Sedges
herb
FAC
8.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
Carex spp.
3. common greenbrier
vine
FAC
9.
Smilax rotund L11'
4. ironwood
tree
FAC
10.
Car rims caroliniana
5. blackberry
herb
FAC
11.
Rubus betulifolius
6. sweetgum
tree
FAC-
12.
Liquldambar sryraciva
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 86%
r7arks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
HYDROLOGY
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
E] Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
we 7

SOILS
4JB
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy loam
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udifluvents
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes [21 No
Hydric Soll Present? [21 Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4
10YR 612
sandy loam
4 -18
10YR 511
2.5YR 414
occasional distinct
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
0 Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? L�] Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? El Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soll Present? [21 Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4JB
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/25/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.Johnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes 0 No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑ Yes 0 No
Data Point #: 4JB
2. flowering dogwood
Cornus florida
shrub
FACU
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
L American beech
Fagus grandifolia
tree
FACU
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. flowering dogwood
Cornus florida
shrub
FACU
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. American holly
Ilex a aca var. o aca
shrub
FAC-
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >181t
4.
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
10.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
5.
IL
b.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBI., FACW, or I+AC (Excluding FAC -): 4%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has not been met.
.u0:• s i
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
❑✓ NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >181t
❑ I~AC- Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
WL�1

SOILS
4JB
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy loam Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udif events
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes [ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist)
Mottle Color
( Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4
IOYR 3/4
silty loam
4 -18
I OYR 5/4
silty clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Hydric Soil Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional
1
0

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
47C
wet
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.7ohnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significant) disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes El No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes Q No
Data Point #: 4IC
1. American sycamore
tree
FACW-
W rticWTV lrs711i
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
Q Drift Lines
1. American sycamore
tree
FACW-
7.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Platanus occidentalis
Depth of Surface Water: V
2 Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
2. river birch
tree
UPL
8.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
Betula ntgra
I common greenbrier
vine
9.
Smilax rotundifolia
AFACI
4. red maple
tree
0.
A ter rubrum
S. honeysuckle
vine
FAC-
11.
Lonicera japonica
6.
12.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 60%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
Q Drift Lines
❑ NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: V
2 Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC- Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 811
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has been met.
W(.4

SOILS
4JC
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy laom Series
Is this Sampling Point
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udifluvents
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes No
ydric Soil Present? E Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -8
1 OYR 412
10YR 616
common/distinct
silty clay loam
8 -18
l OYR 5/2
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
[I Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfdic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Q Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
NVETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 2] Yes ❑ No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
ydric Soil Present? E Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.
i ,

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(19R7 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4JC
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.Johnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? 7 Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes ❑Q No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes 0 No
Data Point #: 4JC
1. American beech
tree
FACU
►IVA DEC VV_NIt NUN I
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
1. American beech
tree
FACU
7.
FIELD 013SERVATIONS
Fagus grandifolia
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >t8"
2. flowering dogwood
shrub
FACU
8.
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met. 771
Cornus florida
3. American holly
shrub
FAC-
9.
Ilex o aca var. o aca
4. Chinese privet
shrub
FAC
10.
Ligustrum sinense
5. sweetgum
tree
FAC+
11.
Liquidambar styraciflua
6.
12.
ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 40%
emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has not been met.
I:rtAM.1 lIFel"'/
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD 013SERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >t8"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
emarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met. 771

SOILS
47C
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy laom Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
T is Udifluvents
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes Q No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist)
Mottle Color
( Mansell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4
10YR 314
silty loam
4 -18
1 OYR 5/4
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Suifidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes F] No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes El No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes No
ydric Soil Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional.
sfq

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manua
4JD
wet
Project/Sitc: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.Johnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? / 'Yes No
Community ID: successional
Is the site significant) disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes Q No
Transect ID: wetland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes Q No
Data Point #: 4JD
2. cattail
Typha latifolla
herb
OBL
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
PLANT SPECIES
STRATUM
INDICATOR
1. common greenbrier
Smilax rolundi Alta
vine
FAC.
7.
❑ Drift Lines
2. cattail
Typha latifolla
herb
OBL
8.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
3. soft rush
Juncus of sus
herb
FACW+
9.
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
4. blackberry
Rubus betulifoltus
herb
FAC-
10.
Remarks; The hydrologic criterion has been met.
5.
11.
6.
12,
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 75%
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
HYDROLOGY
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
0 Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
Q Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
Q NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required);
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 2"
F] Water- Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0"
❑ FAC - Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0"
Remarks; The hydrologic criterion has been met.
�'� ll

SOILS
4JD
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy loam
Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udifluvents
Wetland Hydrology Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? 21 Yes ❑ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -18
IOYR 611
sandy clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
Q Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has been met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes [] No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? 0 Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? 21 Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Data point is jurisdictional.
t

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 CE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
4]D
up
Project/Site: LNG - Crabtree Creek
Date: 2/26/2009
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh
County: Wake
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), C.7ohnston
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ✓ Yes No
Community ID: forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑ Yes 2] No
Transect ID: upland
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)?
❑Yes F�j No
Data Point #: 4]D
L. American beech
tree
FACU
VEGETATION
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
DOMINANT
STRATUM
INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
PLANT SPECIES
❑ Drift Lines
L. American beech
tree
FACU
7.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Fagus grandifolla
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
1 loblolly pine
tree
FAC
8.
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
Pinustaeda
3. American holly
shrub
FAC-
9.
Ilex opaca var. o aca
4. Chinese privet
shrub
FAC
10.
Ligustrum sinense
5. white oak
tree
FACU
11.
uercus alba
6.
12.
ercent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC -): 40%
emarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has not been met.
lWORKOX81CA
❑ RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS):
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
❑ Inundated
❑ Aerial Photographs
❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
❑ Other
❑ Water Marks
❑ Drift Lines
0 NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE
❑ Sediment Deposits
❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
❑ Water - Stained Leaves
❑ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18"
❑ FAC- Neutral Test
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
�;7

SOILS
4JD
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Congaree fine sandy loam Series
DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
Typic Udifluvents
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
❑ Yes [ No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance /Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0 -4
10YR 514
loam
4 -18
10YR 614
clay loam
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Aguic Moisture Regime
❑ Sulfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Listing on National Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Gleyed or Low Chroma
❑ Color
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
NVETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes 0 No
Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
H dric Soil Present? ❑ Yes El No
Remarks: Data point is not jurisdictional.

PW
USGS
science fora changing world
78 °37'30"
35 °52':
397 201
50'
47'
730
F
35 °45'
78 °37'30"
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000 -meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S
10 000 -foot ticks: North Carolina Coordinate System of 1983
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
The National Map
iff 10
35' 32'30"
RALEIGH EAST QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5- MINUTE SERIES
78 °30'
35 °52'30"
Imagery ............................. ..........................NAIP, July 2008
Roads ......................... .....................02006 -2010 Tele Atlas
Names ..................................... ..........................GNIS, 2008
Hydrography .................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008
Contours ..... .......................National Elevation Dataset, 2008
35' `v 32'30"
* SCALE 1:24 000
MN. 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
8o 56" 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
159 MILS C N
lo 25" 1 0.5 0 1
25 MILS MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH FEET
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
U.S. National Grid CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
100,000 -m Square ID NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
(IV This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the
draft USGS Standards for 7.5- Minute Quadrangle Maps.
Grid Zone Designalion A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11
17S
ORTH CAROLINA
nnnnann�rr w r nnn7•rnn�
Bayleaf
Wake
Forest
Rolesville
Raleigh
Raleigh
Knightdale
West
East
Lake
Clayton
Wheeler
Gamer
ADJOINING 7.5 QUADRANGLES
72
70 000
=ET
70
69
50'
68
67
66
65
64
47'30"
63
62
61
60000"N
35 °45'
Lv L 78*30'
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Interstate Route State Route
US Route Local Road
Ramp 4WD
• Interstate Route C3 US Route O State Route
RALEIGH EAST, NC
2010