Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG210402_2020 DMR_20210129 (8)F0000 1 Environmental Chemists, Inc. envirochem6602 0 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab ■ 910.392.4424 Fax srn 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS info@environmentalchemists.com Elliott Consulting Date of Report: Jan 13, 2021 PO Box 112 Manteo Report #: 20M-2289 Aydlett NC 27916 Report M 2020-21850 Attention: Ken Elliott Customer ID: 11120025 Project ID: JWJones Lumber Co Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55439 Site: SDO #1 12/28/2020 9:45 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed COD SM 5220D 87 mg/L 12/30/2020 Lab ID Sample ID: M-3957 Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55440 Site: SDO #1 12/28/2020 9:45 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed Residue Suspended (TSS) SM 2540 D 31.5 mg/L 01/04/2021 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55441 Site: SDO #1 Downstream #1 12/28/2020 9:50 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed COD SM 5220D 61 mg/L 12/30/2020 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55442 Site: SDO #1 Downstream #2 12/28/2020 10:40 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed COD SM 5220D 127 mg/L 12/30/2020 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55443 Site: SDO #1 Upstream #1 12/28/2020 10:15 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed COD SM 5220D 85 mg/L 12/30/2020 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55444 Site: SDO #1 Upstream #2 12/28/2020 10:20 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed COD SM 5220D 87 mg/L 12/30/2020 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 20-55445 Site: SDO #1 Upstream # 3 12/28/2020 10:35 AM Water Ken Elliott Test Method Results Date Analyzed COD SM 5220D 54 mg/L 12/30/2020 Report #::2020-21850 Page 1 of 2 Environmental Chemists, Inc. envirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info@environmentalchemists.com Elliott Consulting Date of Report: Jan 13, 2021 PO Box 112 Manteo Report #: 20M-2289 Aydlett NC 27916 Report #: 2020-21850 Attention: Ken Elliott Customer ID: 11120025 Project ID: JWJones Lumber Co Comment: Reviewed by: Report #:: 2020-21850 Page 2 of 2 Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 Sample Receipt Checklist 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Client: ► OC j��(,r�,-E— . Date: I Z Z� � Report Number: ZIJ— Z�,� ,�0 Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery ❑ JUPSX FeclEx ❑ Other ❑ ❑ YES ❑ NO N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES ❑ NO 8Z N/A 12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt °C Corrected temperature upon receipt_ How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank Against Bottles IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0 YES 10 NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded VC, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES 10 NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? YES 10 NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? YES 10 NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? YES 10 NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? YES ❑ NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? YES ❑ NO 11. Was adequate sample volume availableT YES ❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? YES ❑ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? ❑ YES ❑ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? ❑ YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? ❑ YES ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ** ❑ YES ❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? El YES ❑ NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 'C v c m a al LI c cqim �Cv�C0�-�c- mi c-- cn p �D 3 3 N 3 N 7 3 7 'O tp 1 m (D -'I n N 2) M 3 NN 0 c M tp � M N 0 tD N N@� � p, cnv rn� toy v� to v a (D o0 y p wvNOjv3 v3 vv 3. 3 o z O O O 04*0 00 0 i o N LD Z rn 3 N �► i i i i i i j N_ Q > 00 00 00 00 0o m l 3 � o d - o X_ 0CD 0 � a O rr qs ur ` a c 0--M t 04` 09 f 0 0 0 0 a] a o -n 0 'n 0 91 -n 91 'PI -n m Sample �- — — m M m m Type m 3 Composite W a G) n n O n O t7 O n 0 n O 0 Gi n Grab 3 �i o °n ->, � � G7 � � r 9� G) �n 'DnH-OG) 'G Gi 'fl G) '0 G) 'D Container m (P or G) Chlorine — N M v mg/L CD M 1 UI 30 ( m LAB ID 3 �•• JVN w NUMBER rr 7 u � X NONE C yCL HCL '9 x x X X x X H2SO4 m i 3 P n p n r HNOJ C n n NAOH D 0 O THIO Z I � m OTHER G ' c G N o C a D f I Ul T N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N I O O O O O O o v v v O ID v CAI IDa 4m I 3 0 M D m 0 d Io 0 c: C 7 fG (7 C (D 3 0 V Z Z n v z �T v N 00 D A Z m gn �m sZ z A 2 r v x 0 2 `+ v Nm m�m 0 (7 V Q 'w Z V, 4 V W Z N t0 Y