20070809 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20070509

N D~~R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, DlreCtOr William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
May 7, 2007
MEMORANDUM:
0 ~ 0 80 9
TO: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Environmental Biological Supervisor
Division o£ Water Quality
FROM
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
qt1~ ~ ~~ r~ p~+ '` _ T,~
M>~Y ~ 10UI
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review ,~~`~~ _ ~~`rr. M1
Lee Dunn & Sam Williams
Carteret County, 2690 Lennoxville Rd., adjacent to the North River at the conflux
of Taylors Creek, in the Town of Beaufort.
Proposed Project: Proposes to restore 400' of shoreline with a series of stone sills and rock revetment,
construct a 4-slip docking facility, boat ramp, and conduct excavation along the
dock.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
May 28, 2007. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ryan Davenport at
[phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY:
SIGNED
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
DATE
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110°% Post Consumer Paper

!Ulaj~r Permit ~e~ Schcd~lg
DCM $ DWQ $
Development Type Fee (14300 1601 435100093 1625 6253) (24300 1602 435100095 2341)
I. Private; non-commercial
development that does not involve
he filling or excavation of any
etlands or open water areas: $250 100% ($250) 0% ($0)
II. Public or commercial
development that does not involve
the filling or excavation of any
etlands or open water areas: I $400 100% ($400) ~ 0% ($0)
III. For development that involves
he filling and/or excavation of up to
I acre of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A,B, C, or

0 below applies: I
III(A) Private, non-commercial
development, if General Water
Quality Certification No. 3490 (See
attached) can be applied. $250 100% ($250) 0% ($0)
III(B) Public or commercial
development, if General Water
Quality Certification No. 3490 (See
attached) can be applied $400 100% ($400) 0% ($0)
III(C) If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3490 (see
attached) could be applied, but
DCM staff determined that
additional review and written DWQ
concurrence is needed because of
concerns related to water quality or

aquatic life:
$400
60% ($240) I
40% ($160)
III(D) If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3490 (see
attached) cannot be applied. $400 60% ($240) 40% ($160)
IV. Development that involves the
tilling andior excavation of more
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas: $475 60% ($285) 40% ($190)

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Lee Dunn and Sam Williams
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 2690 Lennoxville Rd. in Beaufort, Carteret County adjacent to the
North River at the conflux of Taylors Creek.
Photo Index - 2000: 50-607 grid (015,P15) 2006: 49-6338 grid (K12,L12)
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2716389.371 Y: 357329.441 Rover # J031916C
LAT 34°42'29.45 LON 76°36'57.89
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA Dredge & Fill
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 8/06, 3/19/07
Was Applicant Present -Yes, No
5. PROCESSIiV'G PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc 4/4/07
Office -Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Local Land Use Plan -Beaufort-----9/26/97
Land Classification From LUP -Residential, Conservation
B. AEC(s) Involved: CW, EW, PTA, ES
C. Water Dependent: Yes
D. Intended Use: Private
E. Wastewater Treatment: Existing - On-site septic
Planned - N/A
F. Type of Structures: Existing - 2 single family homes
Planned -Sills, Dock, Boat Ramp
G. Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
F,XC'AVATF.D FILLED OTHER
(A) Shallow Water 1-labitat 885 ft~ 10,824 ft~
(B) Other High Ground 3,854 ft~
(C) Open Water 2,750ft~ Incorp.
952ft~ Shaded
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 18,316 ft~
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: No
8. PROJECT SGMMARY: 1~Ir. Dunn and Mr. Williams propose to restore 400 feet of shoreline adjacent
to their property along the tiorth River. This will be accomplished through a series of stone sills and a
rock revetment. Sand terraces will be placed behind these structures and will be planted with marsh
;rases. A four slip dockin; facility and boat raltlp will be placed between two of the sills with
exca~~ation along, the dock.

Field Investigation Report:
Dunn & Williams
Page 02
9) Narrative Description:
The project is located 2690 Lennoxville Rd in the Town of Beaufort, Carteret County. The lots are
located on Lennoxville Point at the terminus of Lennoxville Rd. The North River borders this site to
the east at the conflux of Taylors Creek.
The properties owned by Mr. Dunn and Mr. Williams have a combined size of 2.19 acres and ranges
from 0' to 6' above NHW. Currently on the site there exists a single family home owned by Mr.
Dunn along with all associated utilities. On the south end of the shoreline there are the remains of an
old bulkhead. The shoreline has scattered patches of Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) and
Salt Meadow Grass (~artina patens). The rest of property is landscaped with various upland grasses
and Live Oak (Quercus viraLiniana). The project is bordered to the south by a vacant lot and to the
north by asingle-family residence under construction.
The Division of Water Quality classifies the North River as SA waters and Taylors Creek as SC
waters. This area is not a Primary Nursery Area and is closed to the taking of shellfish. Beaufort's
Land Use Plan dated 1997 classifies this area as Residential and Conservation within the AEC's.
There are no shellfish leases in this area. No shellfish resource or SAV's were seen during the site
visits. Average soundings in the project area range from 0' to -l' at NLW.
10) Project Description:
The applicants are proposing a shoreline stabilization and habitat enhancement project to be located
on its east shoreline bordering North River. The project proposes to restore 400 liner feet of
shoreline. This would be accomplished by using a series of stone sills stabilize the shoreline. Sand
planting terraces would be created behind these structures and planted with marsh grass. In addition,
the applicants propose a 4 slip docking facility and boatramp with excavation.
Two stone sills would be constructed an average distance of 30' waterward of NHW. The len~~th of
the sills wo~.ild be 183' and 9~t' respectively for a total of 282'. There would be a 30' space between
the sills. The sills would be 16' wide at the base and have a crest elevation of +2.5' above substrate
and a crest width of 2'. This elevation would be 1' above NHW. Along with the sills the applicant
proposes a rock revetment to be placed along an existing bulkhead that is in bad repair. This
revetment would be 99' long and extend 10'-1 S waterward of the existing wall. The top elevation of
the revetment would be +-1.5' above substrate or +2.5' above NHW. Both the sills and the revetment
would be constructed out of class II Granite rock. Three re Elective markers would mark the top of
sills.
Placed behind the sills would be 7.914ft~ of sand fill of which 4,496ft~ would be placed below NHW.
The fill would be approximately 2' deep beginning at -.5'NLW and ending at approximately 3' above
NHW therefore placing 537 yd3 of material behind the sills. An additional 1.120ft~ (108yd3) of fill
would be placed behind the existing bulkhead and proposed revetment of which 115ft2 would be
placed below NHW. ~"arious upland grasses would be planted in fill area behind bulkhead and
revetment. Fill area; behind the sills that are above NHW would be planted with Salt 1~Ieado~~~ Grass
(~artina patens) and area; that are below NHW would be planted with Smooth Cordgrass (S~ irtina

Field Investigation Report:
Dunn & Williams
Page 03
alterniflora). The applicant has indicated on plats that a sediment curtain would be used during
construction. The sills would maintain a 15' setback off each riparian line.
Situated between the two sills the applicants are proposing a 4 slip docking facility. The pier would
be 122'X6' with a 10'X46' "T" platform on the end. Two 3'X12' fingers and 4 mooring piles will
be placed along the pier to create 4 boat slips. A 13'X12' cradle boat lift would be placed within
each slip. The entire docking facility would extend 100' into the waterbody and would remain 80'
from the nearest riparian line. Water depths at the end of the proposed dock are approximately .5'
NLW. The applicants also propose to construct a 12'X56.6' boat ramp along the south side of the
dock. The proposed ramp would extend 35' landward of NHW and no coastal wetlands would be
impacted. The applicant has not proposed a road leading up to the ramp.
In order to gain sufficient water depths, the applicants propose to excavate a 29'X40' area around the
end of ramp and dock. The existing water depth in this area is .3' NLW and the final project depth
would be .71'. A total of 18 yd3 would be removed and placed on high ground 38' landward of
erosion escarpment and 60' landward of NHW contour. A 40'X30' site has been set aside for spoil
disposal.
10. Anticipated Impacts:
The shoreline stabilization and enhancement project proposed by the applicants would provide
habitat for a number of finfish and shellfish species. Various wetland plants placed in the area
should help to improve water quality from runoff. The installation of the sill system and
excavation would cause temporary turbidity and could be dangerous to boaters if not properly
marked as this is an area of extreme boating activity. The pier should not be a hazard to
navigation as is does not exceed the existing pier line or'/a width of the water body. The
placement of the sand fill would cause ashort-term turbidity concern if proper sedimentation
measures are not employed. The project would disturb a total of 1 1.709 tt~ (885ft~ from
excavation) of shallow water habitat and 3,854ft~ of hi~~h ground. The dockin~~ facility would
incorporate 2,750ft~ while shading 952ft~.
'dame James Ryan Davenport Date 4/16/07 Morehead City

Y~ ~~ 0 ~0 9
DCM M~-1 ~~
APPLICATION for q~R 4 - 200? --
Ma~or Development Permit Morehead City DCi\/!
(last revised 12/27106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
7. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information

Business Name Project Name (if applicable)

Lennoxville Point Shoreline Stabilization and Habitat
Enhancement Project.
Applicant 1: First Name MI Last Name
Lee H Dunn
Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name
Sam C Williams
If additional applicants, please attach an additiona! page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address PO Box City State
74 Millbrook Road 1846 Nantucket MA
ZIP Country Phone No. FAX No.
02 554 USA 508 - 228 -1382 ext. - -
Street Address (if different from above) City State ZIP
Email

~ 2. AgenbContractor Information _~
---- -- --
Business Name
~ TD EURE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Agent/ Contractor t First Name MI Last Name
Charles B Bissette
Agent/ Contractor 2 First Name MI Last Name
Mailing Address PO Box City State
650 Morehead City NC
ZIP Phone No.1 Phone No 2
28I 557 252 - 728 - 4191 ext. - - ext
FAX No. Contractor #
252 728 4192
Street Address (f different from above) City State ZIP
575 HWY 70W RADIO ISLAND BEAUFORT NC 28 -516
~- -
I Email
tdeure@bizec-rr_com
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 3)
~~~~od~o~~,
~~~,
APPLICATION for
Development Permit ,
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple) Street Address State Rd. #
Carteret County 2690 Lennoxville Road NC 1310
Subdivision Name City State Zip
Lennoxville Point Beaufort NC - 28516
Phone No. Lot No.(s) (rfmany, attach additional page with list)
508 - 228 -1382 ext. 7, 8, 9, ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
i,,J f1'_ j ~~ ~.,G; ~i~ North River
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade? d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ^Manmade ^Unknown Back Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
^Yes ®No work falls within.
Unzoned
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (tt.) b. Size of entire tract (sq tt.) I
Approximately 468feet The property size is aprox. 2 19acres, and the project shall
be developed on aprox. 0 39acres inside.
c Size of individual lot(s) d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or -1
Lot 7 0.5acres. fot 8 and lot 9 1.69acres together, NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot srzes please attach additional page with a list) Site ranges from -2 NHW to +6 NHW ®NHW or ^
NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Existing Spartina Alterniflora can be found in the nearshore areas; small pockets of coastal wetlands are located within the
intertidal zone; and upland vegetation is mostly live oak overstory and maintained lawn.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Residential dwellings, timber bulkhead. i
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Residential.
h. How does local government zone the tract? i Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Residential. (Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
^Yes ^No ®NA
j Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ^Yes ®No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ^Yes ®No ^NA
If yes, by whom?
I Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ^Yes ®No ^NA
National Register listed or eligible property? I
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4) APPLICATION for
T~~~}~~~~ Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ^Yes ®No
QPR 4 - 2007
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? tt''~~ ~ ~{®Yes ^No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been cor~t~4phead ~~~ ~L.•'yt^Yes ®No
(Attach documentat5on, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Wastewater is treated by septic tanks.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Drinking water on site is suplied by well.
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
There is no piped discharge to waters of the state on site. Discharges to waters of the state occur through overland flow.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ^Commercial ^Public/Government
®Private/Community
b Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of the proposed project is to restore and protect the shoreline along Lennoxville Point utilizing "Living Shoreline"
techniques which provide habitat as well as shoreline stability. The placement of sand behind headland sills will serve as a
planting medium for Spartina Alterniflora, Spartina Patens, Ammophila Breviligulata, and Uniola Paniculata. These marsh
and beach grasses provide additional shoreline stability and habitat benefits as well as water quality control (trapping
sediment from upland runoff). I
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Excavator(2), dump truck,(2), sediment curtain- The equipment shall be stored on high ground.

d. List all development activities you propose.
The proposed project includes shoreline stabilization along approximately 468 linear feet of shoreline utilizing granite rock to
build 2 sills. and 1 revetment to protect the existing timber bulkhead, the placement of sand planting terraces and the
planting of marsh grasses, and the dredging of 45CY on an area of 885SF. Also includes boat ramp. pier and (4) boatstips.

e Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both. This project entails the
restoration of damaged shoreline, and
increase the existing marsh grasses.
f What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0.39 ^Sq.Ft or ®Acres i
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ^Yes ®No ^NA
that the public has established use of?
h Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
N/A
i Wfll wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ^Yes ®No ^NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ^Yes ^No ®NA
j Is there any mitigation proposed? ^Yes ®No ^NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5) ~~~~1:j APPLICATION for
Development Permit
APR ~ - 200'
<Fonn continues on back>
6. Additionallnformation
/n addition to this completed application form. (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable. must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Ifems (a) - (i) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate. dated work plat (including plan vieev and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
oe^rners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
evhich to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Tom Williamson Phone No [phone] (work).
[phone] Icell)
Address 201 Chapel HiII Rd., Burlington. NC 27215
Name Rockingham Richmond South Phone No None
Address 6452 Quail Run Road, Wilmington, NC 28409
Name Phone Ne ~
Address
I
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
None Known, but there may be one for the failed bulkhead at
the northern 1!4 lot 5 Smithwick subdivision.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k A statement of compliance with the N C Environmental Policy Act (N C G.S. 113A 1-101. if necessary. If the orolect involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands. attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina En,~~onmentai Policy ,4ct
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date March 15, 2007 Print Name Charles B
BISSETTE
__~
Signature ~-:_' _ ~' ~ ~ ~ r
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ^DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
^DCM MP-3 Upland Development
^DCM MP-4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)

Morehead City DCM
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access Other
Channel Canal Boat Basin Boat Ramp Rock Groin Rock
Breakwater (excluding
shoreline
(NLW or
NWL stabilization
Existing
Revetment Sand Fill
Enhancement behind failed
a rox 40
p
Clas II timber

Linear Feet,
Granite Rock bulkhead
1120SF
and an Avg. Sill 1:
(108CY)
Length 40ft 56.6ft 59.261inear 188.4LF
feet long
Proposed Sill 2: 94.1 LF Sand Fill
class II behind Sills:
Granite Rock 7914SF
Revetment (537CY)
Revetment
Enhancement
10ft Avg. Sills will be
Width 29ft 12ft Proposed 16ft avg. wide
Revetment
10ft Avg.
Avg. Existing
_
3 Between
Elevations -1
NA
NA -0.5 NLW
De th
P , to 0
Final Project _ ,7( -2 NA NA +5.5 NLW
Depth
- - - - - --,
7. EXCAVATION ^This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
t ~i 4U CY below NHW
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ®None
M to F Sand
d High-ground excavation in cubic yards.
None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:

2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area.
On site > 30ft from NHW. Sand dredged from the inlet is
proposed to be used as a portion of the material needed to
construct sand terraces, which will serve as planting
mediums for marsh grasses.
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
®Yes ^No ^NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. {i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV}, shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands {W L)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
e F~l I ,
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
40k30' until dry , on site. `~
non ~t ~~}h~
~TTZZ f-
Morehead City D ;iv1
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
®Yes ^No ^NA
(ii) If yes, where?
Local approved upland disposal site.
f. (i) Dces the disposal include any area in the water?
^Yes ®No ^NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ^This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin. use MP-4 -Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
^Bulkhead ^Riprap ®BreakwaterlSill ®Other `;"c?rs:^
~~ ~ - ..
~ ,
c Average distance watennrard of NHW or NWL: 25Ft
e. Type of stabilization material:
Clas II Granite Rock, and clean sand
g Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill 115.44SF(below NHW) Riprap
Breakwater/Sill 4567 SF Other sand 5064.66SF sand fill
below current NHW)
i. Source of rill material.
Dregded area and provided clean sand
b. Length: Total shoreline to be stabilized=468Lin. Ft.
Width: 64ft
d Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 48ft
f (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
®Yes ^No ^NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
Visible scarpment on east side
h. Type of fill material.
clean sand 16000Y) and sand fro^~ dregded area (45CY)
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ^This section nor applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
3 (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes ^No ^NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW).
If yes.
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water aprox. 10 CY
of clean sand(IN THE WATER BELOW NHW)
(iii) Dimensions of fill area aprox. 10x12ft To fill behind failed
timber bulkead(below NHW)
(iv) Purpose of fill
To fill behind failed timber bulkead, and to provide a
planting terrace for grass seed.
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:

` ~ ~ ~ ~~
. ~ ~ ~ _. ..
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Fill material will be stabilized with marsh grass plantings, and the Excavator, Dump Truck, Dozer.
installation of turbidity curtains prior to construction activities, and 2
permanent class II granite rock sills.
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
®Yes ^No ^NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
Reflective markers at sill locations
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ^Yes ®No ^NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
March 15, 2007
Date
Lennoxville Point Shoreline Stabilization and Habitat
Enhancement Project.
Project Name
Charles B. Bissette
Applicant Name
Lee H. Dunn/ Sam C. Williams
~~ /
Applicant Signature ~~ ' % "
/ "

Form DCM MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
~~~
MAR ~ ~ Zu07
11~orehea~ City DAM
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. (i) Is the docking facility/marina:
^Commercial ^Public/Government [ private/Community
^This section not applicable
b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
^Yes
c. (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s) d. (i) Are Finger Piers included? Lyres ^No
(ii) Number ~ If yes:
(iii) Length /~ 2 (ii) Number _2_
(iv) Width ~ (iii) Length .Z~
(v) Floating ^Yes ®No (iv) Width 3
(v) Floating ^Yes ~No
e. (i) Are Platforms included? ®Yes ^No f. (i) Are Boatlifts included? ®Yes ^No
IF yes: IF yes:
(ii) Number I (ii) Number ~_
(iii) Length [1 ~ (iii) Length ~3_
(iv) Width f U (iv) Width I Z
(v) Floating ^Yes (~No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
~} ^ Full service, including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
(ii) Number of slips existing maintenance service
^ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
^ Dockage ("wet slips") only, number of slips:
^ Dry storage, number of boats.
® Boat ramp(s); number o(boat ramps: -~
^ Other, please describe.
Check the proposed type of siting:
^ Land cut and access channel
^Open water; dredging for basin and/or channel
^Open water; no dredging required
Other; please describe.
~~ w4-rG2 ~ M,Na 2
~RGp~rti/G X02 2/aM~P
k Typical boat length: / 7
m (i,)~Wi~ll the facility have tie pilings?
es ^No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
4
j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
I. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
^Yes [ENO

o
uT ~~~~~
+~~,qt7 I :~ 'U~~i
2. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA OPERATIONS - -~n~sdatso~p¢~.~~
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed project.
^ Office Toilets
^ Toilets for patrons; Number: ;Location:
^ Showers
^ Boatholding tank pumpout; Give type and location:
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
e. (i) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge" signs proposed.
(ii) Give the location and number of "Pumpout Available" signs proposed.
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
g. Where will residue From vessel maintenance be disposed of7
h Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed.
i. Give the location of fuel-handling Facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality.
j. What will be the mariria policy on overnight and live-aboard dockage?
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin Flushing?
I If this project is an expansion of an existing marina, what types of services are currently provided?

.. !:~~x
1;~~"'
m. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area? ,'~ %~ ~~ ~ ~ L L) ~~
^Yes JBNo
n. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area? ~Oi'e~"~ e~t~ ~ ~+~ !`1('~ t}~
^Yes ~No ` tJVli
o. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL None
p. Is the proposed marina/docking facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ^Yes ~No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease.
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) ($JThis section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
^Commercial ^Public/Government ^Private/Community
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
4. GRO/N (e. g., wood, sheetpile, etc. If a rock groin, use MP-2, Excavation and Fill.) ^This section not applicable
a (i) Number S ,~ E. M !'_ ~
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.) ^This section not applicable
a. Length b Average distance from NHW, NWL. or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
6. MOORING P/L1NGS and BUOYS gjThis section not applicable
a. Is the structure(s):
^Commercial ^Public/Government ^Private/Community
c Distance to be placed beyond shoreline
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
b Number
d Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
e. Arc of the swing

7. GENERAL
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
> ~S t
~-
r,
M~i~ 1 y ZC~~1/
b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacen m f cilities.
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
of vessel.
c. Width of water body
7 5'O O ~
d. Wate~ epth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWL
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
^Yes ^No ^NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
8. OTHER ^This section not applicable
a. Give complete description:
3 /~s / o~
Date
LENNoxvtu_~ PT, 5rc1oR6L1aljE ST.43fLIZ4i ~Utl
Project Name
LF~ a~ ~/n/ ~S~M W r'~t 4~ S
Applicant Name
~~ / ~~,,-
Applicant Signature

T D EURE
MOREHEAD CITY,
N.C.
T. D. EURE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
POST OFFICE BOX 650
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
PHONE [phone]
3/iS/o ~
Mr. Ryan Davenport
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC ?8557
Mr. Davenport;
Lee Dunn and Sam Williams propose a joint shoreline stabilization and habitat
enhancement project at Lennoxville Point in Beaufort, NC. The project ~~~ill include a
stone revetment, a stone sill and minor grading for planting spartina alternillora and
spartina patens. Also proposed is a joint residential pier with tour boatlitts, and a boat
ramp for launching shallow drat~t flat boats.
Your consideration ol~this proposal is appreciated.
Sincerely.
C.B. Bissette
Agent
~` ^a
t' ' __ ., i,.,i ,
i _
i ~ ' .. ~.
~,:.
J _I
' _ , J ~- j 4~1 ~,5 ~ lr~

Lee H. and Tharon S. Dunn
PO Box 1846
Nantucket, MA 02554
508-228-1382
March 12, 2006
Chuck Bissette
T. D. Eure Construction Co., Inc.
PO Box 650
Morehead City, NC 28557
_ ~~
1 _..
tvlflf ~:i r~~u ~.,1~1 Dv~at:`~
Re: Agent designation for bulkhead and boat basin work at Lot 2690, Lennoxville
R., Beaufort, NC
Dear Chuck,
Please accept this letter as our authorization of you, Chuck Bissette, as our agent
to apply for any and all permits and to oversee the work at our property at 2690
Lennoxville Rd regarding the new bulkhead, repair of the old bulkhead, and the
construction of a boat basin per the preliminary design sketches we have been
discussing. This letter of authorization is effective immediately and is good until
and unless rescinded in writing by us to you.
Feel free to distribute copies of this letter to any interested parties, including any
municipal, state, and federal agencies who have,jurisdiction over this project.
Do not hesitate to contact us if you need additional information.
cer ,
Lee H. Dunn and Tharon S. Dunn
Owners of 2690 Lennoxville Rd, Beaufort, NC

~.
Mor~n~d~ ~i~y ~
~~~
TD EURE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
MARINE CONTRACTORS
P.O. Box 650
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
[phone]
°~~`~ JOBSITE MAP
•sf
. ~
~t:~
~P
O
L
iP ~ Foa
~~4

CJ7
O
Cf1
0 7 0 80 9

0
cn
N
O
N
C31
0
w
.~
0

~~
°°~ • ~ cn
~ ~~, ~
~ '~- yon
~ /~
~ o
w
n
0
y
N
N
m
n
O
z
o cn

0
M
.--i
~i
.~
~_
~L
W
W
Z
O
H-
C.~
W
to
tl~
O
DC
V
O
M
.-~
N
N
O
N
.-,
r-+
.~-~+
O
r,
0
0
0

0

0

~ '~
'~.~-
y `~O
~~ O~
~ o c+~

to
~~
;..o~~ }~
~_ ~'~~
0

0
i
N
O
N
CJt
w
0
rn
c~
~~
O
rn
rn
w
0

0

0

c~

s
C•~ ~.~
cow -9~. 1
ch ~ ~~~, ~
o
~ ©C~
O
r--+
'~.ri
^~
D
D
Z
O
H
U
W
N
O
v
O
O
O~
O
O~
00
00

0

0
~--
~n o

~v
0
~~
,~
'd ~~d
~ vC
~~
CJ1
O
C37
0

0

w
0
w
.~
0
.~
0
n
0
y
m
n
0
z
v
b
~D

tf) O M p ~ '
Cfl
U
U
Z
O
V
W
N
N
U

i
O ch
w
z
oC
w o
J M
Q

~ to
Z N

X
w ~,
L o
N
a
z ~

Q
E- ~,
Qz z ~
~ ~-
J w J _ .o
O. '' ~ ~ H L
p a w ~
z W
~ z m o
a
o ~
~
°- ~ ~
° Q= o
~a

Q '
~ ° _
p

eta
~ viii
°o
~1
~ ~
Ya-
a. ~ .r_
o w
0
cn
D
3
3
C
O ~
`-~
= D 7 0
'-' 70 O
~ ~ ~

-~
z
D rn ~ rn

~
(~ < D
"-' ,o
C -I
~
D G~ z
Z
D C ~ -~
~--
~ Z
G7
rn
X
(!~
Z
G)
D
rn
70
z
r
O

D ~
70 ~
z O
D rn
D p
70
Z ~
T ~
O ~
n
0
m
n
0
z
n
cn

~.
M'~r ~znar
~'~~~
M~r~h~~' Ciry p~M
U ~-~,,~
O
M
117
N
0
H
V
W
O ',
V
(~ ~
Z J
H ~
Z Z
a w
J
~ Q
W
a
O ~
a Q
_~ ~
Z
~ Z (9 ~
Z g
W
a Q ~ U
o a w
O ~ m a
a F- g
o~C Q = O
a a n,
O
N
to
d'
O
'7'
ch
M
N
Q
N

0

n
0
m
n
0
z
D
D
w~a
04( C bW
~1~ID~~

pRoP~RTY
Existing
Spartina -
Patens
WILLIAMS
PROPERTY Existing S.
Alternif fora
W
D
Existing Tree ric
on the property
line
ads
ina
Shoreline
Erosion Mark
\ Ground
as.ooo
61
D ~,eC C JNG
PROPOSE SAND FILL
(See cross ion C-C and D-D)
AREA=41665E
floor lev. Vol.= 373CY
DUNN
PROPERTY
E
t
E
P~R~'C/
WILLIA
PROPER
4.33
Existing
revetrlent
xisting loose lumber
o be rernoved(14LF> \
xisting concrete --~~
ocks to be reMOVed '~--
NF Shoreline
erosion Mark
MSON ~ ,
TY
Existing _~~
timber
bulkhead
concrete rocks
PROPOSED SAND FILL
AREA=11205E
va=lo8a
-o.7sNLV PROPOSED SAND FILL
-1.19NLV
PROPOSED CUT
a, .44
s~ t:5o
~~
20 10 5 0 25 50 100
PROPOSED SAND FILL AND CUT
~y
~~ 3
~ -ooz -o s2 1 ~
\~ 1
1~
1
I ,

\~
\~/ ~ i
i
I

\I~ i

\I 0
II ~ I
(
d

22NLV
-0
\
.
i06NLV .
,-
_D.31NLV
-.91NL V
11 / 1 PROPOSED
` SAND FILL
I
\ AREA=2805F

3. 9 ~ y;` ~ PROPOSED SAND FILL
o.D2~\ ~ AREA=2625F
n

_ r0.35NL V
~Q.48NLV D.61NLV

` ~0.57NLK0.99NLV
0.
7 ~
~~
N
Il~~ ~~5
APR 2007
Morehead City DCM
U~
': i' 0.23I
P.62 .-0.38NL
~~'' .41 0. NLV O.71NLV
5~
PROPOSED CUT (APro~7~~,Fo67NLv
Asa'
-
- ,-Lr
3. ~`_ _
~ ;. ~ Existing S.
.~' ` Atterniflora

...* o.nNLv

5 •-L27NLV
~~ ~
0149 O.ISNLV
-0.28NLV 0.31NLV
•4 ~. ~ ~-0.37NLLLO.B9NLV

-
,6L,:
.~
~ 0.92NL V
-0.83NL

• 07NL V
2 tl •
_
' 1.18NL V -1.51NL V
157NL V.1.19NL V
.-1.62NL V
PROPOSED SAND FILL
`' e. 3 AREA=32065E
~~ va.= lalcr
1~
1176 '0.79NL V
-
a ~-119NLW
4.71

ao, JNI1N~d a3SOd02ld
~~335) SSVii9 d0 9NIlNV7d f73SOdO:Id 00 t OS SZ 0 S O l OZ
~ u-~
vt~nn~iNVd os:~ ass
ono:Nn wirinonin3aa n:Ndowwv
' ~ Jll2i3d02id
> ~ NOSWdI~IIM
~~ nW uoiso.~~
E./ au~~a.~o~iS ~N~~~l
V panowa.~ aq o} s~{~o.~ ~~d
a}a.~ouoo 6ui}six3
~~~~,j~panowa.a aq o}
.~agwn~ asoo~ 6ui}six3
}uaw}ana.~
sr~oo.~ a~.auauo~
6ui}six3
eer
213d02id
89f NN(1a
2
1'01
nab ~oolj
1'E
~/ ~NI > 1
y ~~ V
f9
'sN3tvd p,o a U~ ~ n q
vNI121vdS d0 9NIlNVId a3SOdOZId
.~agwi~
vao~a=Na3tiv ~`"~~ 6 u i~ s i x~
r VNL171Vd5 d0 9NILNV7d 43SOdotld ~;
n'IN6I'1- ,
nINSL"0-
nlN6Cl-
M ~NIS'I=AINBi'i~'
/~1NSOY-
AINLOl =_,~

I51N26'0
/11N68'OTINLE'0-
'nlN[E'0 AlN8d0--'
I4lNSi'0=
0,.10 f1U,Aa~~
s 6ui}six
I1lN6i'I=
A lNL9'0}i~Nl9'0=
--
h1N66'OTINLS'0\ 0
hlNi9.0 n'm8Y0~ _
MlN ~
niNSrO-.
n'~7Cg~°- ob.
AlN9i'I-.
'AlNl6- /1lNIE'0 ~ A1N22'0=
~~0 ~l!~ aya~ow ~ \
soot - dv
Q~~n ~~I~
IC'9
000' A
28'
puno~9
UOISO..l3
UI~a.,lOl,{S
sua}nd
nui}ands
6ui}six3
aUl)
A3aadad aya uo
iu aa~l 6ui~six3
n ~ ~~ ~ ®~~
~ ~ ~~
~~~ ~
~~ i
o.~o~ fiu,~a}~y
~S 6u.}s,x3 ~d02ld
~ ~~ S#~J ~~IM
sua~.od
I oui}.gods
• 6u~~.six3
3 ~\
rl 29U- r N/
20"0- A
£ ~ ~'StiJ '~I~dO~d

7
PR~PFR~I'
Existing
Spartina -
Patens
WILL f~~S
PROPS Existing S.
Alterniflora
w
1
Existing Tree right'
on the property
line proposed Rock
~~pq•afea•,.~TM" ness
~i~de5~, ~;(1rr9----yea--
C ~~ 1: tL~.~ L~~~.IJ) s
Shorelin C
Erosion r ,
Ground
D .000
~~C ~ ING
Floor
DU N N 4.68
PROPER
4.33 2.
Existing \ ,
concrete rocks
revetMent
Existing loose lur^ber
to be rer,ovedCl4LE) ~
~ Existing concrete -~
PFR rocks to be reMOVed
•
~~~jyF Shoreline ~(j~
Erosion Ma ~
WILLIAMSON
PROPERTY
'~y
~'~F~L` ~~0.62 1 ~
Existing ____~
timber -~
bulkhead
--
~~
~`
.~
N
-1.19NLW
~~~
MAY 3 zoos "
Moreh®ad ~Gity D
Sill Reflective
Macke
F
OSED S~LL "F".
Class II gran to rock.
Length= 94.~ft
Crest Elev. _ +2.5
Bottom Wid~= 16ft
Bottom Elev.(varies)= between -2 and -1. ~~
~ ~
o.z2 LW
S' I Refl~live .-91NLW
arker )proposed ,~
so 6'x122' Pier ~
-u ' ~ 1 10'x46' Dock
0 O I ~_ TTY
CURT
W
.r L18NLV"_1S LW
6tAC W
TURBIDITY
CURTAIN
Transition aria.
Make_a`~mooth slope.
-0.7SNLW n • • I
-1 19NL V
Proposed Bias II r
Revetment
(Avg. 59.2~ft I 9,
Top Elev.= + .5
Crest wide- ft
Bottom de= loft)
' ~~c s~ ~:so
20 10 5 0 25 50 100
PROPOSED LAYOUT
W
V~
.o NvO~Ellri(Ypox. ~r~O
EC0.0s5 ~5EC~ION N Iti °.67NLV
AND E-E)
-I.19NLV
ting S.
rniflo a Linel00ftoffMHV
regulations)
Sill Reflective
MaEker
0. L
' ° ~~ `POSED SILL "B".
-0.37y~ 4Cp g
Class Il gr~1~1''Ee rock. PROPOSED CUT
Length= 18g.~'LW
Crest Elev. _ +2.5
Bottom Wide= 16ft
Bottom Elev.(varies)= between -2 and -1.
t
Proposed Clas II Granite Rock
Existing Revetment Enhancement
(Aprox. 40ft long,
Proposed Top Elev.= +4.5
Proposed Avg. Bottom Wide= 15ft)
TURBIDITY
CURTAIN
ite Rock
~~

4.7(