20080638 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20120203

1111111111 Jill Jill FAST-LANE
31849
o
®�
0 0 0 SAME D Y
0 0
MW o o a
m o o t
ff
o a
- a NEXT DAY
aq aa�w ,'C0 'IT9
FROM S & EC
11010 RAVEN RIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27614
PICKUP DATE Al /Wb� PICKUP TIME
DRIVER # OF PIECES_! - __WEIGHT I
BILL TO ( SHIPPER RECEIVER 3RD PARTY
CAR VAN ROUND TRIP: CHARGES
TO ' E i'1 C. -K J z
DWQ
2321 CRABTREE BLVD
RALEIGH, NC 27604
828 -0303
s:ft, . o:qa)
PROJECTOC-l- rl i( rZ aby). .
SIGNATURE PRINT a4�- DA TEL'��TIhAE____________
• -- _W. _,.._ _ ��.�...�...._.._� -... ... ... . , - ,- .lay -,.. - ...,.x- . _ ___ _ .._ . -.. _ _.. __ _ _ . _., _. _.

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
To:
Transmittal
We Transmit to you Herewith:
❑ Drawings
❑ Specifications
❑ Brochures or photos
❑ Correspondence
9 As per your request
Remarks:
Project #: / r 3_3 V4 Date: 131-1�
Project Name:
File:
❑ For your information and files
l54 For comment or approval
❑ Returned for correction, resubmit
❑ Approved as noted
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
-\ In C
cc:
Under Separate Cover:
❑ By mail
Ef By courier
❑ By express
vJ7��
AN 3 ' 2012
DENR • WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STQRMWATER BIRMCN

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
January 31, 2012 S &EC Project No. 7238.E2
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. James Shern
NCDENR — DWQ
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Mr. Eric Kulz
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 1650 Mail Service Center
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Reference: Year Two Annual Monitoring Report
Hammond Road Stream & Wetland Restoration Site
Raleigh, NC
Enclosed please find the Year Two Annual Monitoring Report dated December 2011 for
the above referenced site. As you will find in the report, it is our opinion that the restored
stream reach and its adjacent wetlands are currently stable and functioning as intended.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest
opportunity.
We thank you for your assistance to date.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
4
David Gainey
Project Manager
Attachments: Year Two Monitoring Report dated December 2011
Cc: Mr. Victor Bell, Bell Investments Limited Partnership

Hammond Road Stream
and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring Report
Wake County, North Carolina
December 2011
Cataloging Unit — Neuse River Basin 03020201
Prepared For:
Bell Investments Limited Partnership
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Curol na 27614 • Phone; (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: [phone]
www.SandB.C.com

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This monitoring report has been prepared by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) in
order to present and evaluate site monitoring data for the period January 1, 2011 through
December 1, 2011 for the Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site in Raleigh,
North Carolina. This year serves as Year Two of the required five year monitoring period. This
report includes the following:
Project History
Wetland Hydrologic Monitoring
Stream Bank, Riparian Buffer, and Wetland Vegetation Monitoring
Stream Physical Monitoring
Stream Biological Monitoring
Monitoring Success
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
Sheet 1— Monitoring Plan
Appendix A — Stream Photo Station and Bankfull Event Photos
Appendix B — Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix C Stream Geomorphologic Data
Appendix D — Stream Pebble Count Data
Appendix E — Wetland Soil Data
1.2 Project History
The project site is located immediately northwest of the intersection of Hammond Road and
Rush Street in south Raleigh, North Carolina (Wake County). The total property is under the
sole ownership of Bell Investments Limited Partnership and consists of approximately 49.7
acres. In conjunction with the widening of Hammond Road, a reach of stream adjacent to the
road right -of -way and its adjacent wetlands was restored. Site restoration work included the
construction of approximately 625 linear feet of stream channel and approximately 0.33 acres
(14,375 square feet) of wetlands along an unnamed tributary of Wildcat Branch.
Restoration including stream and wetland construction was performed by Kenneth -West Grading
of Raleigh, NC between August 25 and September 22, 2009. Restoration utilized generally
accepted natural channel design and construction methodologies to restore an appropriate

dimension, pattern and profile for the stream. In- channel log and boulder structures, and coir and
excelsior matting were utilized to stabilize the newly graded channel alignment and portions of
the buffer area. Bank, buffer and wetland planting consisting of live stakes and bare root
seedlings of various native tree and shrub species was performed by Gregory, Inc. of Angier, NC
between January 27 and January 29, 2010. Herbaceous wetland plugs were also utilized within
the restored wetland areas along with select on -site transplants.
2.0 MONITORING
As -built data were collected following construction, between February I Oth and February 171`,
2010. Year Two data were collected on April 131i and April 10, 2011. Benthic Monitoring
initiated in the Spring of 2010 and will be performed annually through Year Three as verbally
agreed upon with NCDENR -DWQ staff
This section includes; 1) wetland hydrologic monitoring, 2) vegetative monitoring, 3) stream
physical monitoring, 4) stream biological monitoring, and 5) evaluation of overall site
monitoring success. These data are provided for comparison of As -built through Year Two
monitoring data.
2.1 Wetland Hydrologic Monitoring
During the as -built limited- engineering survey on February 12, 2010, the approximate
boundaries of relocated wetlands (transplanted wetland soils) were identified. Annual hydrologic
monitoring within these boundaries includes visual observation and soil evaluation utilizing
shallow hand auger borings performed by Mike Ortosky, LSS of S &EC, NC Licensed
Professional Soil Scientist ( #1075), as described below.
Three soils monitoring points (A, B and C, see as -built plans) were established in February 2010
in order to establish a baseline for ongoing evaluation of the hydric soils within the wetland
areas. The as -built evaluation of the soils in February 2010 (prior to growing season — high
groundwater season) indicated hydric soil indicators in all three boring sites.
The Year Two evaluation of the soils was performed on November 3, 2011 here again by Mr.
Ortosky. Wet conditions and hydric soil indicators were observed at all three boring locations.
Slightly darker colors in surface horizons are likely due to increased moisture and organic matter
content. Also, some variations in soil texture and depth are a result of slightly offset location of
soil borings. Similar evaluation of soil conditions during the late growing season will be
performed for future monitoring years. Please refer to Appendix E for soil descriptions of the on-
site relocated wetlands.
Based on our site observations and wetland soil evaluation and the abundant and diverse
wetland plant coverage (described below) within the relocated wetlands, these areas
currently meet the criteria for jurisdictional wetlands.

2.2 Stream Bank, Riparian Buffer, and Wetland Vegetation Monitoring
Success criteria for riparian buffer and wetland vegetation are based on the average number of
live stems per acre across the site. A mean density of 260 stems per acre is required for riparian
buffer and wetland vegetation plots at the end of the five -year monitoring period. Success
criteria for bank vegetation are based on the survival of 50 percent of the planted live stakes, as
counted during the as -built monitoring.
Six (6) sample plots are located across the site to monitor vegetation within the restored
wetlands, within the riparian buffer, and on the stream banks. The two (2) wetland vegetation
monitoring plots are rectangular 5 meters x 20 meters (100 square meters, or approximately
1,075 square feet). The two (2) riparian buffer vegetation monitoring plots are square, 10 meters
(32.8 feet) on each side (100 square meters, or approximately 1,075 square feet). The two (2)
stream bank vegetation monitoring plots are each located along approximately 25 linear feet of
the restored stream channel to monitor success of live stakes. The locations of all vegetation
plots are identified on the Monitoring Layout (Sheet 1 of 1). Photos of each vegetation plot are
included as Appendix B.
As -built (baseline) vegetation counts were performed on February 11 h and February 17t', 2010
by S &EC. Vegetation counts for Monitoring Year Two were performed on April 10, 2011 by
S &EC. Vegetation monitoring data for riparian buffer and wetland vegetation plots was collected
using Level 1 of the Carolina Vegetation Survey monitoring protocol.
Live stake survival from the as -built monitoring count to Monitoring Year Two for the site
overall is approximately 73 percent. Live stake counts by species and by plot are presented in the
following tables:
Live Stakes - As -built — Februa 17'b 2010
Common Name
Species
Bank 1
Bank 2
Species Total
% of Total
Silky Dogwood
Corpus amon:um
24
21
45
50%
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
18
11
29
33%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
5
10
15
17%
TOTAL
47
42
89
Live Stakes - Year Two — Apr 10 2011
Common Name
Species
Bank 1
Bank 2
Species Total
% of Total
Silky Dogwood
Corpus amomum
16
16
32
49%
Silky Willow
Salixsericea
14
6
20
31%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
2
11
13
20%
TOTAL
32
33
65
100%
Live Stake Survival =
68%
79% 1
73% (overall
survival
Based on the vegetation monitoring plots, the overall site planted woody stem density is 910
stems per acre for the as -built monitoring and 496 stems per acre for Monitoring Year

Two. Tables indicating the total number of live, planted woody stems and species diversity in
each riparian buffer and wetland sample plot for the as -built and Year Two are included below:
Plot Numbers
Buffer 1
Buffer 2
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Total
Planted Woody
Box Elder
Acer ne ndo
0
0
1
Stems- As -built
19
18
25
28
90
Planted Woody
2
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
0
1
Stems- Year One
7
0
20
22
49
Planted Woody Stems, As -built
Monitoring (2/2010)
Plots
As -built
Totals
Buffer 1
Buffer 2
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Box Elder
Acer ne ndo
0
0
1
0
1
River Birch
(Betula nigra)
2
0
0
0
2
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
0
1
1
3
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
1
0
7
12
20
Green Ash
(Fraxinus enns lvanica)
1
0
0
0
1
Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera)
2
5
0
1
8
Black Gum
N ssa s lvatica
0
0
0
1
1
Willow Oak
(Quercusphellos)
1
0
0
0
1
Unknown Oak
uercus s.
1
3
0
1
5
Black Willow
(Salix ni a )
3
0
4
0
7
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
0
0
5
0
5
Elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis)
0
0
1
11
12
Unknown Species
7
10
6
1
24
As -built Totals
19
18
25
28
90
Calculated Plot Live Stem Density
(stems /acre )
769
728
1,012
1,133
Site Average
Live Stem Density — As -built
911

Planted Woody Stems, Year Two
Monitoring 4 /2011)
Plots
Year Two
Totals
Buffer 1
Buffer 2
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Box Elder
Acer ne ndo
0
0
1
0
1
River Birch
etula nigra)
0
0
0
0
0
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
0
I
1
3
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
1
0
7
12
20
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1
0
0
0
1
Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera)
1
0
0
0
1
Black Gum
(Nyssa lvatica
0
0
0
1
1
Willow Oak
(Quercus hellos
1
0
0
0
1
Unknown Oak
(Quercus s.
1
0
0
0
1
Black Willow
Salix ni ra
0
0
4
0
4
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
1
0
5
0
5
Elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis)
0
0
1
8
11
Unknown Species
0
0
1
0
1
Year Two Totals
7
0
20
22
49
Calculated Plot Live Stem Density
stems/acre
283
0
809
890
Site Average
Live Stem Density — Year Two
496
There is a total of eleven (11) different identifiable planted woody species represented within the
six (6) sample plots. In general, the survival rate of planted vegetation within wetland areas and
along stream banks is high. Within portions of the stream buffer, the survival rate of planted
vegetation was low at the time of the Year Two monitoring. Areas on -site with low planted
vegetation survival were identified and have been brought to the attention of the Owner. Select
overplanting is being coordinated for the upcoming 2011/ 2012 planting season.
The average number of planted woody stems per sample plot is 22 (buffer and wetland plots
only) for the as -built monitoring and 12.25 for Monitoring Year Two. Volunteer woody and
herbaceous species are appearing due to surrounding forested areas and the seed bank in the
transplanted soil. Volunteer trees on -site are mainly Sweet Crum (iiquidambar styraciflua) and
Red Maple (Acer rubrum) seedlings. Herbaceous vegetation within the wetland and stream bank
areas on -site is dense and includes Tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum), Climbing Hempvine
(Mikania scandens), Asters (Symphyotrichum sp.), Beggar Ticks (Bidens sp.), Sedges,(Carex

sp.), St. John's Wort (Hypericum sp.), Pennsylvania Smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum),
and others.
With an average of 496 stems per acre during Monitoring Year Two, the vegetative
component of the mitigation effort currently meets the established success criteria of at
least 260 live stems per acre by the end of Monitoring Year 5.
2.3 Stream Physical Monitoring
Four (4) cross - sections consisting of two (2) riffle -pool pairs were established on -site and are
shown on the Monitoring Layout (Sheet 1 of 1). S &EC completed the as-built stream record,
including a longitudinal profile and all cross - sections, on February 17th, 2010. S &EC completed
the field work for Monitoring Year Two on April 13ffi, 2011. Comparative cross - section and
longitudinal profile data from the as -built and Monitoring Years One and Two data collection are
included as Appendix C.
Pebble counts were performed at each riffle and pool cross - section location. A total of 100
substrate particles were collected and measured at each cross - section in order to characterize
substrate composition and gauge any change in substrate over time. The comparison of as -built
and Year Two pebble count data shows that substrate composition varies within the restored
stream section. The substrate within Riffle 1 consists mainly of fine to coarse gravel, the
substrate within Riffle 2 consists mainly of medium to coarse gravel, the substrate within Pool 1
consists mainly of very coarse sand to very coarse gravel, and the substrate within Pool 2
consists mainly of very coarse sand to very fine gravel. Pebble count data from the as -built and
Year Two monitoring is presented in Appendix D.
Based on visual observation of the entire restored stream channel and in- channel structures,
followed by the comparative analysis of the as -built and Year Two data sets; the restored channel
is stable and exhibits little departure (vertical or horizontal) from the as -built conditions.
Success criteria have been met in that the stream bedform features and cross - sections have
remained stable (i.e. the stream has retained its restored Rosgen stream -type classification)
through the current monitoring year. Accordingly, it is our opinion that Year Two
monitoring of the stream channel confirms morphological success.
2.4 Stream Biological Monitoring
On February 11 t, 2010 and April 10, 2011, qualitative aquatic species assessments were
performed to evaluate the post - construction and initial recolonization of the restored stream
reach by benthic macroinvertebrates, fish, and amphibians. Samples were taken via kicknet,
dipnet, and visual inspection of rocks and leaf packs within the active channel. Benthic samples
were taken both within the restored stream reach and, for comparison, upstream of the restored
stream reach.
The biological sampling performed during As -built Monitoring showed that the Restoration
Reach contained the following aquatic taxa:

• Amphibians
o Two -lined Salamander (Eurycea cirrigera) —1 adult
o Green Frog (Rana clamitans) — 20+ tadpoles
• Aquatic Isopods — 1
• Crustaceans
• White River Crayfish (Procambarus acutus) —1 adult, 4 juveniles
• Crayfish (Cambarus latimanus) —1 adult, 20+ juveniles
• Ostracods —1
• Nematodes — 2
• Mollusks
• Physid Snails— 50+ adults, 100+ egg masses
• Limpets — 5
• Insects
• Trichopterans
■ Freeliving/Netspinning Caddisflies -- 20+ larvae
• Dipterans
Chironomid Midges
• Cricotopus sp. larvae — 20+
• Chironomus attenuatus larvae — 2
e" Tipulid Cranefly Larvae — 5
• Hemipterans
■ Water Boatman — i
The biological sampling performed during As -built Monitoring showed that the upstream
Reference Reach contained the following aquatic taxa:
• Amphibians
o Green Frog (Rana clamitans) — 20+ tadpoles
• Amphipods — 3
• Crustaceans
o Crayfish (Cambarus latimanus) — 5 juveniles
• Mollusks
o Physid Snails — 10+ adults
o Limpets — 5
• Insects
• Trichopterans
■ Freeliv ing/Netspinning Caddisflies — 1 larva
• Dipterans
■ Chironomid Midges
• Cricotopus sp. larvae — 3
• Chironomus attenuatus larvae — 2
■ Tipulid Cranefly Larvae — 2
Syrphid Fly Larvae (Rat - tailed Maggots) — 2
The biological sampling performed during Monitoring Year Two showed that the Restoration
Reach contained the following aquatic taxa:
7

• Amphibians
• Green Frog (Rana clamitans) — 100+ tadpoles, several adults
• Leopard Frog (Rana sphenocephala) —1 adult
• Aquatic Isopods — 20+
• Reptiles
o Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) —1 adult
• Crustaceans
o White River Crayfish (Procambarus acutus) —100+ adults, several juveniles
• Mollusks
o Physid Snails —100+ adults, 50+ egg masses
• Insects
• Trichopterans
■ Freeliving/Netspinning Caddisflies — 50+ larvae
ipt
• Hemerans
■ Water Boatman — 20+
■ Giant Water Bug — 2 adults
• Odonates
■ Dragonfly Larvae —100+
■ Damselfly Larvae _ 50+
Hirudinea
o Leeches — 3 adults
The biological sampling performed during Monitoring Year Two showed that the upstream
Reference Reach contained the following aquatic taxa:
• Amphibians
o Green Frog (Rana clamitans) — 20+ tadpole
• Crustaceans
o White River Crayfish (Procambarus acutus) — 20+ adult
• Mollusks
o Physid Snails — 100+ adults
Based on the presence of the above - listed aquatic invertebrates and amphibians, we anticipate
that future samples will show continued progression towards a diverse aquatic fauna. As
vegetation grows and provides shade and decreased water temperatures for the restoration reach,
invertebrates and other aquatic organisms will likely continue to recolonize this area.
2.5 Monitoring Success — Year Two
Based on vegetation data collected within the vegetation monitoring plots, wetland
evaluation, and stream physical and biological data, the site has met the required success
criteria.

I d0 I InOA` i 9NNOIINOW # llln9 -5v
:'ON P,4J 77� germs
D . I JIN6il7twvj al-Mn 7N "Q7 7)IyM L9h6 9t8 (6l(J �a 0065 9VB (6161 �uo4d • t19LZ mv=0 vwx '4aP R1 P►�11 �P U �^hl 01011
61N7W157/WIT79:au:� wi .:off Vd 6numniquoD �II7�IIO�II$ ups
; ° i.i6�°a NOUVy CiGgN aN` U2M aMd �1 �✓
,31 la z4 W\i3211S CIVON aNONNVP
:.o J"roj WrW
(dl 025) 19NNVWD '% '01 OZ `L I aNb Z 1 kl iv 21934 NO a;1=109 `dlda l7ln9-Gv
W`d3`d1S 03`dv1S3?J 93 5 A9 (310 =1100 ` iVG GJ9 aNV)QA�nS JN121�2N19N3-Q�llWll 'Z
(Od Z£'0) SaNVUIM GnO1S321 JivRxOs,4JV 32l`d
G3?Jflld33 3119 -nV 30 GNOIGN3WIa aMd `GNOUVA]13 `SNOIlt1001 *1
: S310N
`AOON -r 901
NOII`d�101S321
WV3b1S 1?1V1 *P
(d31S NIIM) 9N`fA-SSr)210 ` ,021 \
C-
td
SNOt103S-SSG210 I
9NWIJNOW I?1 12J
S101d 9NNO11NOW N0Ilb'199;IA
SIN10d OlOH J
aN999� f
1 � �
I 101d 9NRI
N041YA09A ja no
70
a I
9NI1N d0
1
7
S LI W ll (mvig
rn
I
I
I I X1.1 JNI 11NOW_
N 11'4107 OMdIIAM
Z 1004 /
I JNOIIOJS -SS021
9NRI09 1105
I �
/ 1 _
/I
91
NOIl`d2101
1Vtl3?11S aN3, /�� 1
1
1 �
rn
1 1 �
I ;rudlb
_GGMI
I
X11
I 100
1 1014 9NRI0IJN0W
N�Iltl�`,7� /� �INt/B W`d3?J1S
f
9NR1� 1105
r
1 r
z ,airs
N011�s -s �
Z 1fJ14 9NIdOlINOra �__
NOII`dJ3`)aA CIN`d112M
9NRI09 TOG
I i
Z 101d 9NI*SO11NOW
N011'd1=93A`JM±9 W"19
� 1
Z I.a'W NNOINOA
NCj1VJ393A W4.Ing WV3?Jl
O
Z
(
O
y
O
2
Z
D 1
.05 = 131dOS
MYGNrlOG WDiON
' 340214
1
I k
s
0
0
N
a

APPENDIX A - STREAM PHOTO
STATION AND BANKFULL EVENT PHOTOS

Appendix A
Stream Photo Station and BankfuH Event Photos
Riffle 1, As -Built Condition, 2/17/2010
Riffle 1, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 7238.E2

Appendix A
Stream Photo Station and BankfuH Event Photos
Riffle 1, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 7238.E2

Appendix A Stream Photo Station and Banld'ull Event Photos
Pool 1, As -Built Condition, 2/17/2010
Pool 1, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Two Monitoring S &EC Job No. 7238.E2
December 2011

Appendix A Stream Photo Station and BankfuR Event Photos
Pool 1, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Two Monitoring S &EC Job No. 7238.E2
December 2011

Appendix A
Stream Photo Station and Bankfull Event Photos
Rif:ie 2, As- Built 'ondition, 2/17/2010
Riffle 2, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC lob No. 7238.E2

Appendix A Stream Photo Station and Bankfull Event Photos
Riffle 2, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Two Monitoring S &EC Job No. 723812
December 2011

Appendix A
Stream Photo Station and Bankfull Event Photos
Pool 2, As -Built Condition, 2/17/2010
Pool 2, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 7238.E2

Appendix A
Stream Photo Station and Bankfull Event Photos
Pool 2, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job No. 7238.E2

Appendix A Stream Photo Station and Bankfull Event Photos
Evidence of Bankfull Event, 7/23/2010
Evidence of Bankfull Event, 7123/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Two Monitoring S &EC Job No. 7238.E2
December 2011

Appendix A
Stream Photo Station and BankfuR Event Photos
Evidence of BankfaH Event, 11/3/2011
Evidence of Bankfull Event, 11/3/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job No. 7238.E2

APPENDIX B - VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, As -Built Condition, 2 /10/2010
Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, As -Built Contrition, 2/10/2010
Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Buffer Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC lob #/ 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Wetland Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, As -Built Condition, 2/10/2010
Wetland Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year Two Monitoring S&EC Job # 7238.E2
December 2011

c _

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Wetland Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, As -Built Condition, 2/10/2010
Wetland Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, Year One, 7/23/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Wetland Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, As -Built Condition, 2117/2010
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, Year One, 7/25/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1, Year Two, 4/1312011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, As -Built Condition, 2/17/2010
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, Year One, 7/25/2010
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S &EC Job # 7238.E2

Appendix B
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2, Year Two, 4/13/2011
Hammond Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year Two Monitoring
December 2011
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S&EC Job # 7238.E2

APPENDIX C - STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA

w
z
O
O
N _
o LL.
z �
o O +
Ql�
awU)
OC �
H O
0 U
Q
Z
O
Q
i
_ 1
0 m co N u LO Nr
►n IT It IT It
N N N N N N N
(4221) UOIICA213
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
o v
o
O
N
+
O
o_
0
ED
1Q
I
0
i
i
N

w
z
QO
oC
O
UN
pC J
O
o
Z O �
J v ^
- m
�zm
O t
o —
Q L
Q N
LLJ
o"
oU
Q
0
Z
O
Q
OLO m co v
N N N N N
(4221) uoi -4rA212
I It
N N
O
O
O
O
O
t
O
if
tv,
C
O o
O
N
+
O
O
+
O
O
O
O
N
CO
U)
I
N
L
t6
1�
1
i
i
No.
OLO m co v
N N N N N
(4221) uoi -4rA212
I It
N N
O
O
O
O
O
t
O
if
tv,
C
O o
O
N
+
O
O
+
O
O
O
O
N
CO
U)
I
N
L
t6
1�
1

w
Z
O
O
J
LL-
Z LL-
N �
3 Z �
C) O m
Q � N
w
Q
0
n
Z
2
2
Q
(1221) U014EA21:1
0
0
O
+
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
o6
t-:
6
L
IT
V
N N
N
N
N
N N
�
m
y
N
O
i
I
O
N
r+
E
(1221) U014EA21:1
0
0
O
+
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
o6
t-:
6
L
IT
V
N N
N
N
N
N N
(1221) U014EA21:1
0
0
O
+
O
m
C9
o
�
y
N
O
O
O
N
+
O
O
O
+ O

W
z
O
O
F-
(!i
z
g
0
z
Q
Q
H
Q
Q
O
z
O
a
J
Q..
N N
z
C) + +
V Q
W �
O
OC
U
o m
Ln It
N N N N
(1271) UOlgeAP12
u Ln �
I- �
N N N
0
0
M
0
0
m
O
N �
+ CO
0
u
Ot!7. tp
0 y
N
m
+ 1
O T
O
0
0
0
°o
0
0
o
� o
3
C�
s
.I
I
i
o m
Ln It
N N N N
(1271) UOlgeAP12
u Ln �
I- �
N N N
0
0
M
0
0
m
O
N �
+ CO
0
u
Ot!7. tp
0 y
N
m
+ 1
O T
O
0
0
0
°o
0

(S) -o
W T —
cn
WHO
CZ �-
z o
(n p O
Q►_-0
oZQ
oo�,
z
O
Q
O m
Ln �1 V
N N N
►n d m
Nr
N N N N N
(4994) NOIIVAQI;l
N —
�r �r
N N
O
O
m
O
Ln
+
N
O
O
+
N
O
Ln
0
0
O
Ln
+
O
O
O O
N
0
Q
1
L
U
L
(S)
x
Ln
O
D-
O
w
m
X
m
Q
L
N
I L
c�
U
n
i
q
1
I
a_:
f,
i•
X
OL
N
X
l
1
s
�x
r
O m
Ln �1 V
N N N
►n d m
Nr
N N N N N
(4994) NOIIVAQI;l
N —
�r �r
N N
O
O
m
O
Ln
+
N
O
O
+
N
O
Ln
0
0
O
Ln
+
O
O
O O
N
0
Q
1
L
U
L
(S)
x
Ln
O
D-
O
w
m
X
m
Q
L
N
I L
c�
U

O
�\
_�
LU O
� O �
w O
�--
z O
+
Q CO
(V z
o O (S)
O
Q
L
i
0
�i
�
N
x
V1
jr
�1
O
Ln
N N N
N N N N N
(4 -9a4) N O UVAIT I
N -
N N
O
LD
O
Q0
+
O
+
LO
0
�r
O
+
O
+
m
O
o m
N
z
O
Q
N
N
L
V
M
L
VJ
x
Qn
-1�
C
O
w
m
m
lQ
T
L
L

APPENDIX D - STREAM PEBBLE COUNT DATA

CO
CD
a.
r-
-------------------------------------- - --- --- —'-
--- ------- --- -- --- --- --- -- ---
----------------- --- -- -- --- --- -- ---
-----------------------------------------------------------
----------------- - -- ---- -- --- --- -- ---
---------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
4 ----- ----- ` ----- ,---------------- ~ ----- ~----- ----- "
----------------- ______ _______ __ _
----------------- ______ _______ _
----------------- ---------------------------
__
--- -- ---- ----- --- --- '--- --- --
--- --- - --- ---- -- ---- --- ---- --
[-----F--7----T— --[---1---1----�-----U---1--��
/ | | | | | | | U | `|
/ / / u
__ __
------ ___ __ __ ___
-'— -- -'--- - — -- -- --''' --'— -- ---~
-- - - --- --- - — - -- - - — - - - - - — - - - —'- — - - -
___ ___ _ ___ __ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _____
--' --- ---- -------------------------------------- -
'_- --------_---_--_-----------------------------------
0 0) co fl- (C) w) v m om �-
n-
|
��
0
�~
CD
�-
co
c�
v-
n-
�
�
T-
co
�
�
CL

CO
----------------- --------------------------------
--- --- - - -------------------------------- - ----
----------------- ----- -- --- -- - --- --- ---
----------------- ---- --- --- ---- ----- --- ----
----------------- --- -- -- ---- --- -- --
___ __ _ ____ ____ __ __ ____ ___ __ ___
----------------- ---- --- --- --- --- --- ----
I-_--_--__--____--------_-~__-^__-^----~__-^
,MIN
--- --- ---- --- ------ — —
--- ------ — --- ------- —
__ _______ ___ __ ___ __
___ __ ___ _ ___ __ ___ ___ _
CO CL
__ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ____
----------------- --- -- --- ---- ---- --
--- --- ----- ----- -------------- --- -- -
__-------- .~_--___`_----__-^__~-.�--^
__ ____________ _
--- ---- --- ---- -- — -- --- --
--- - -- --- --- -- — ------------------
----------------- --------------------------------------
----------------- -------------- -------------------
----------------- --------------- ----------------------
__ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ -----------------------
F--l-'--] ----- l ----- [-' -l----lF---�-----�--
---- -- - - -- ----- --- --- -- --- -- --
- - -- -_-- __- __ __ __ _ -- __ �����
[ - - ---- -__ ---------------------------------------
----------- I -----T-- --[---1---1----- ----1-- -
- ---L-------l-----L-----------l---L--------
n-
�-
c�
�z
�~
c�
v-
�
�
V- E
"_
ci
C*4
CD
�
a.
�
�
CD
ci
0
CD
0
(f)
cm
v-
C*4
CD
�
a.
�
�

2
La
nj
CL
----------- -- --- ---------------------
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____
- ------ --- ------- --- ---
_ ___ __ ___ ______ ___ __
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __
____ __ __ ___ ____ __ __
___ ___ __
__---__`i~~--~__------_____-----------__-_---,
m" mh..-
---- ---- ----- �---- ----------- �
___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ _______ _ ___
_ _ __ __ ______
----------------- ___ __ ___ ___ ___ _ _
-- - - - - - - --- --- --- --- - — - - --- - - ''
'---- ---- ---- --- - -- -- ---- --- - '--
----------- ----- --------------------- � ����� 1-- -'-
----------- __- __- ---- --_ _-_ -__ ��- ----
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ _____ ___
'-- - ---- --- --- ---- -- ---- -- --
----------- ------ --- -- ---- --- ---- ---
-__
I _ - I---______-_--- -`-___-_-^- _~-_--
v-
n-
n-
�o
�-
�-
v~
C;
�
�
=
a.
CN
a.
�
IL
�~
��
IR
1
CA
lat
11--0
Q
0
0
0
cr)
cm
T~
�
�
=
a.
CN
a.
�
IL

Cl)
c
0
-.0
N
O
V
E CN
V
m
0
0
E
E
ca
0
0
CL-
----------
- ----------
-----------------
-----------
-----------
11 ----------
-----------------
----------------
------
------
------
------
------
---- -----------------------------
------
I - -----
-------
-------
------
-----
-----
-
-----
-----
-----
-----------
-----
----
-------
------
------
------
------
------
---------
I
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
-----------
------
------
-------
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
------
------ -
------ -
------ -
------ -
------
------ -
------
- - - - -
-------------------------------
--------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
----------
----------
- - - - -
------
- - - - --
------
-----
- - - --
-------
-------
-----
- - - - - -
-----------
----- ------
----------
- - - - -
-------------------------
------
------
- - - - --
----------
-----
-------
-------
-----
---- ------
----- ------
----- I
-
-
------
--------------------------------------------
--------------
-- -------------
-----------
----------------------------
-----
-----------------
----- ------
------
-----------------------
------
------------
-----------
----- -------
Cf)
C*4
------
-----------------------------------------
tN-
------
-------------
-----
------
------
----------
--
-
-
------------
----
----------
-----------
- - - --
----------------
- - --
- - - --
--------------
-----------------
-----------------
-----
-----
-------------------------
- - - --
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - --
--- -
---- ------
-
-- - -----
-------------------
---
---------------
---- -
- - --
-----
----------
- - - - - -
-----------------
-----------------
-----------------
-
- - - - - -
- - - --
- - - --
-- --- -
- - - - -
-------------------------
-------------------------
-----
- - - - -
- - - - - -
----- ------
- - - - - -
- - - -- -
-
- - - - -
- - - --
---
-
- - - - - -
----
----
----
- I-, - : _-
-------
---
- -
-
- - - --
----------
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
-
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - -- - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - -
- - - --
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - -- - -
- - - - - --
- - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - --
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - -- -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
U84JL JOUI-A IUGDJGd
I
0
0
T-
O
O
E
1�
(D
N
co
4)
C4
a-
m
CL
4)
IL
J?
(L
O
0)
Go
I,-
co
U)
le
Cf)
C*4
U84JL JOUI-A IUGDJGd
I
0
0
T-
O
O
E
1�
(D
N
co
4)
C4
a-
m
CL
4)
IL
J?
(L

APPENDIX E - WETLAND SOIL DATA

Mmond Road Site - Soils Monitoring
Mdse Ortosky — NCLPSS
Boring "A"
0 " -10" 10 YR 4/2 sandy clay loam
10' -14" 10 YR 5/2 sandy clay loam
Boring "B"
0 "-6" 10 YR 4/2 sandy clay loam
6" -14" 10 YR 4/3 sandy loam
Boring "C"
November 3W , 2011
0" -3" 10 YR 3/2 sandy clay loam
3 " -12" 10 YR 4/2 sandy loam
12 "46" 10 YR 4/2 sandy loam w/pockets of 10 YR 5/4 loamy sand
Free water at 10"
Refer to site as -built plan for bod* monitoring locations. Site is more heavily vegetated
with herbaceous and some woody material since 2010 site visit
J