20201776 Ver 1_Sam Furr Sr Apts PCN 012221 _compiled_20210128

Preliminary ARM Data Entry Fields for New Actions WEPGWe[lands and Environmertal Planning Gmulj
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ❑RIVI ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Sam Furr Senior Apartments
2. Work Type: Private Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑
6/1
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form Bad and Me]:
PJD Request and PCN for a utility crossing to support residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: South Creek Construction, LLC (Jake Palillo)
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant I Number]: WE PG, PLLC c/o Daniel Kuefler
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8521 Sam Furr Road, Huntersville, NC 28078
35.4451,-80.8844
S. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 00537401,00506120B
9. Project Location — County [PCN Farm A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Farm A2c]: Huntersvllle
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: McDowell Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form Kc]: Catawba/030501 01
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 Fv--1 Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
0 Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

ID#* 20201776
Version* 1
Regional Office * Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 11/18/2020
Contact Name* Heath Caldwell
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Sam Furr Road Senior Apartments
Project Owner* Bi-Part Development
Project County* Mecklenburg
Owner Address: Street Address
18611 Starcreek Drive
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Region
Cornelius
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
28031
USA
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
PF 401 Water Quality Certification - j— 401 Water Quality Certification
Regular Express
r- Individual Permit r- Modification
j— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below.*
The forthcoming PCN will include a request for Nationwide Permit 12
associated with the proposed Sam Furr Senior Apartments site on 2.4
acres north of Sam Furr Road near it's intersection with Birkdale
Commons Parkway. There is one wetland in the sewer easement
area and no aquatic resources on site.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
12/1 /2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
4536_Overall Site.pdf 537.52KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
(also understand that DWR is not required to respond orgrantthe meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 11/18/2020

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
January 22, 2021
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDWR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wcjoski
NCDWR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -Construction Notification for
NWP #29 for the Sam Furr Senior Apartments site in Huntersville, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina
Messrs. Roden -Reynolds, Johnson, Wcjoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for a Jurisdictional Determination and Nationwide Permit 929 for the Sam
Furr Senior Apartments site located on 2.4 acres located NE of the intersection of Sam Furr Road
and Sedgebrook Lane in Huntersville, North Carolina. The site is a proposed residential
development and consists of one wetland totaling 0.009 acres. Please refer to the Jurisdictional
Determination Information section for information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include a temporary impact to 0.009
acres of Wetland A for sanitary sewer installation. The alignment of the proposed sewer is
dictated by the required tie-in location with ex infrastructure and an open cut is required due to
the shallow depth of the proposed utility and close proximity to existing stormwater
infrastructure. Anti -seep collars are proposed to avoid additional wetland impacts and the
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.conn Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 1
len.rindnerga wetlands-epg.com

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
necessary temporary impacts will be restored by replacing 6-12 inches of topsoil and reseeding
with native stabilization mix as noted on the exhibits. No additional permanent stream or wetland
impacts are proposed for this project.
As the only impacts associated with this project are minor and temporary in nature, no
compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at daniel.kueflergwetlands-ems com.
Sincerely,
Daniel Kuefler
Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len.rindnerga wetlands-epg.com
www.wetlands-epg.com
//0: r-- -
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

C
O
V
d
d
Q
L.
N
CL
Permit Application

a`'pF wArE�Q�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Sam Furr Senior Apartments
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
South Creek Construction, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
35294-689
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Jake Palillo
3d.
Street address:
18611 Starcreek Drive Cornelius INC 28031
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Daniel Kuefler
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e.
Telephone no.:
336-554-2728
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
00537401, 00506120B
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.4451 Longitude:-80.8844
1 c.
Property size:
2.42 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
McDowell
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
2c.
River basin:
Catawba/03050101
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is located just north of Sam Furr Road, and just east of Sedgebrook Lane in Huntersville, North Carolina. The topography consists of gentle
slopes, with the elevation ranging from 710 to 740 ft. The site is covered with disturbed, young mixed pines and hardwoods and includes a small
section of landscaped walking trail, strip buffer, and underground pipeline right-of-way.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.1
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project consists of utility installation to service a residential development
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Grading and clearing of the site will utilize typical mechanized tools & equipment - dump trucks track hoe, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Included in application
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: WEPG
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Excavation
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.009
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.009
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts by avoiding —96% of onsite streams and all wetlands. The
proposed sewer alignment and associated temporary impacts are required due to the shallow depth of the utility installation and close proximity to
existing infrastructure.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Anti -seep collars will be installed to state standards and temporary impacts will be restored by replacing 6-12 inches of topsoil and reseeding with
native stabilization mix.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>2.25
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm
water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has
not yet been submitted to the Town
of Huntersville will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Huntersville
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Town of Huntersville
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes 0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes 0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No
additional phases proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential habitat in this region
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov
https://polaris3g.meeklenburgcountync.gov
Digitally signed by Daniel
Daniel Kuefler Kuefler
Date: 2021.01.22 15:07:46
Daniel Kuefler
-05'00'
01-15-2021
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

VE� �- .-,---�
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
A14ent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
reSOUrce (i.e. Stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory Permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered Property Owners oi- legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities On the property as identified below, CIO hereby authorize associates Of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (`VEPG) to act On my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance Of applicable
permit(s) and/Or certitication(S).
Project/Site Name: Sant Furr Road Senior Apartments
Property Address: Saar Furr Road, Huntetsville, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 00'37401, 00506120E
Select one: l any other
Name: Jake Palillo
Company: South Creel: Construction, LLC
Mailing Address: 18611 Starcreek Drive, Cornelius, NC
Telephone Number : [phone]
Electronic IMail Address: jpalillo r(aol.com
Propertj} Oir/
Brovr* / Qt/..
(I L3I2d2U
Date
The l)itei-este(IBit)'er/Other «cknoirle((,,,ec thud (ill tigreTm nl unclior conditet
dice diligence activities exists between the the signata_r of this uurthor¢«timl ill cases
inhere the propert�V is irnt owned by the sigwlta1'.
Charlotte Office:
www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]

►0
Maps/Plans

William Amos
Hough High School
'1S
7t!5
if- Horne Dp.pol Q Caldwell
SITE
�
I
7
�
Gf
r
P,
a
o0
,7
Oakwood
Evallstm vo'R
Corporate Housing
9
a
OR
4 W�
b
ce Academy
°
t T r
loot
y
�
r
� a
Bd
Hatms
�'�
4b'Nptt �,Ildi
PROJECT BOUNDARY
ati Charlotte Lake_--
STUDY LIMITS
9
Fargo Private Bank Camden Sedgebrook
-
•p
Apartments
y
0% 7`
41Dr
Radcliff Dr
`.
o o
Hickory Tavern %1 C
t ak"ot - 064. veer �j►
0116d
Sit
�
vot
�et$pti
n
Local Cab Authorized
Driver Of Huntersvill
9
dl w
Su
LiLl
L
od9et C
S
a �,`Puel m�Ra
,$ rfand
Sunglass 1-1
�`a� sunglasses a�,
t-,p Victoria's Secret v
�yPy-
�m
xc'
a$`
Birkdale village Barnes E
9
M:dwood Smokehouse
iakrout • Delivery Chipotle Mer
Jdson's Deli I
Takeout' Dt4kv ty Sam Furr Rd B
p� Medi Weigh1loss
1I Huntersville
Coral Sushi
T.Arolit = ,John D wells. DDS. PA
m
a
9 m
+y1e'Or KJng Tiger Tae Kwon
Do of Huntersville
stew o�
`e Birkdale Goo► Club
Fairways at Birkdale
Acres: SAM FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS Prepared for:
+ - 2.42 South Creek Construction
Mecklenburg Co., NC
FIGURE
1 VICINITY MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
9115120 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification BLK DCK ,
qA1

40k
'IV dr
At-
16
4" A
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
4(
4L
L
W"
PAI
N fto % ^ A — Aerial Imagery Provided by
4. Fa Goo le Earth 2020 N
Acres: SAM FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS Prepared for:
+/-2.42 Mecklenburg Co., NC South Creek Construction
FIGURE
2 9115120 AERIAL MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Subject to USACEINCDEQ verification BLIK DCK

utl� tit' Llub u -
CORP F3UY��;�
umping
tatiQn
w
LOCATION
Lat: 35.4451 N
Long:-80.8844 W
HUC: 03050101
UPPER CATAWBA
Acres:
+/- 2.42
FIGURE
3 9115120
•
Y
�I
It
PROJECT BOUNDARY
• STUDY LIMITS
• � `iil
2145
MCDOWELL CREEK
�r
I
USGS QUAD ICO;
Lake Norman South,NC
1993
SAM FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS Prepared for:
Mecklenburg Co., NC South Creek Construction
USGS MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification BLK DCK
'i
N

wl�s
r
�r CA( r
I
PROJECT BOUNDARY
�M— STUDY LIMITS
v er
1'Q
21
MU
. +Le02
CD End
- -
�
�
oll
cc
Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Acres t
pe rcen
in a cen
Symbol
AOI
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay
2.3 96.3%
loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8
0.1 3.7%
to 15 percent
.��� T
�. C
r''�♦
slopes
Totals
for Area of
2.4 100.00/6
ti
NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
N
Interest
Mecklenburg County 1980
I
Acres:
SAM FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS
Prepared for:
+/- 2.42
Mecklenburg Co., NC
South Creek Construction
FIGURE
4
SOIL
SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
Drawn By:
Reviewed By:
9/15/20
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
BLK
DCK t

73
PARCEL: 00537401
BI-PART DEVELOPMENT LLC
18611 STARCREEK DR
CORNELIUS, NC 28031
L
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
PARCEL: 00506120B
CSP COMMUNITY OWNER LLC
PO BOX 27329
HOUSTON, TX 77227
Sara) FUrr Rd
73
rp
I s�
Bridgeton
Acres: SAM FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS Prepared for:
+/- 2.42 Mecklenburg Co., NC South Creek Construction
FIGURE
5 PARCEL MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
9115120 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification BLK DCK . ,,

/ EXIST. 72" RCP
EXIST. SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE /
\
EXIST. 60" RCP
L� err nwr 2
005-00-20
EXIST. WETLAND A // ?
I� �399±SF, 0.009AC
EXIST. PROPERTY < <
EXI� / \\t L �% i % �i� = - -'�°,E - - BOUNDARY �-
�-�./ice
'BOB C
/ I 005-s74-oz \ \\llll �11111 / SCALE: 1 =80
rrL 4-WDALr 0 40' 80' 160'
DA Hall: as 7.1
ColeJenest BIRKDALE INDEPENDENT LIVING Project No. 4536
& stone EXISTING CONDITIONS Issued 01. 08. 2021
FIGURE 6

-\,
TIE LATERAL TO EXISTING 6" SEWER
EXISTING 60" STORM PIPE
EXISTING 72" STORM HEADWALL � wN �0 maomry n w I /
005-00-20
SSA
• �.! ! / TEMPORARY IMPACTS WILL BE
/ !! ONOIONS 8Y REPLACING
N —12 ---
/ e INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND RESEEDING / j _
/ WITH NATIVE STABILIZATION MIX �_— % �- ��► i
/ r
EXISTING SPILLWAY i6 ---� ��G � ♦ \ � 7
PROPOSED VARIABLE
/ WIDTH SAN. SWR AND EXIST. WETLAND A
STORM DRAINAGE j ♦ \
EASEMENT 399tSF (0 009AC) \
u \\ S
/ PROPOSED OFFS17E PROPOSED
SANITARY SLATERAL STORMWATER
`�� ` ♦ SAM FURR SENIOR
. ; ` ♦ ♦ APARTMENTS
Q PROPOSED OFFSITE O
� \d �• DRAINAGE
O V
PROPOSED STORM PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PROPOSED UNDERGROUNO — —
DRAINAGE EASEMENT STORMWATER SAND FILTER STORMWATER DETENTION '
h.
I I / EXIST. R/W
�7�E
1 AMABOVALE [L�9T 1 "-80' I
a� SCALE: - z
MEW A r fiwmDACE WAGY
PRdW£RTrOIME7� ,!4[Y, MC 0 40' 80' 160'
W61. \ .` . \\, \\ \\\\ DA Mal. as ,.,
ColeJenest BIRKDALE INDEPENDENT LIVING Project No. 4536
&Stone OVERALL SITE Issued 01.08.2021
FIGURE 7

S � / / / \\ 1 , ( PROP. TIE-IN TO EX. SSMH #6 \
P OP. IT Y / RIM=714.70 \
SE ER CLEANOUTS / / INV. IN=709.90(PR.)
S INV. IN=710.24(EX.)
INV. OUT=709.90(EX.) I
T z
XIST. 15" CLTWATER
U SS EASEMENT
QJO 'EXIST. � " RCPINV./L i �``/
O PRQP. ANTI -SEEP C LLARS TO BE I `�
INSTALLED AT THE DO NSTREAM AND-
lv UPSTREAM SIDE 0 THE WETLAND
CRO/SING. COLLARS TO BE INSTALLED
PER STATE STANDARDS.
PROP VARIABLE WIDTH -AN
SA . SWR. AND STORM �\ \
RAINAGE EASEMENT
/ ,ItXPT. R/W 1 \ \
PROP. RIP RAP'
PROP. 6" DIP SANITARY ��\ ��\ \! LINED SWAL� �(
SEWER SERVICE ( pl \`� \�
�� PROP. 18", P� \
PROP. SSMH #1 \� \ STORM 0 FALL
! i �CM, \�J \ � � SCALE: 1 "=20' Z
0 10' 20' 40' �-
ColeJenest BIRKDALE INDEPENDENT LIVING
& Stone
WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
EXIST. 60" RCP
INV.=710.74
PROP. 399fSF (0.009AC) OF
TEMPORARY WETLAND A IMPACT (WIDTH
VARIES WITH PROP. EASEMENTS)
EXIST. WETLAND A
399fSF (0.009AC)
EXIST. CONCRETE SPILLWAY
TEM PORAU
IMPACTS WILL BE
RESTORED RE -EXISTING
CONDITIONS REPLACING 6-12
INCHES OF PSOIL AND RESEEDING
WITH NATIV STABILIZATION MIX.
Project No. 4536
Issued 01.08.2021
FIGURE 8

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■ii�illillll�il
III■\■■■■■II■■■■.'�i■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\�I■■III■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■IIIIII
!11■■■11'll■■■■ice■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
ColeJenest
& Stone
161maZw;
BIRKDALE INDEPENDENT LIVING
PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=40' HORZ.
1 "=4' VERT.
Project No. 4536
Issued 01.08.2021
FIGURE 9

O
.4—j
c�
.E
v
v
we
jurisdictional
Determination Information

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
(For Jurisdictional Status and Identifying Wetlands and Other Aquatic Resources)
A. Site Details/Location:
Site Name/Number: Sam Furr Senior Aparements
County: Mecklenburg Acreage: 2.4 Latitude*: 35.4451
Parcel ID Number(PIN)#(s): 00537401, 00506120B
Property Address: 8521 Sam Furr Road City: Huntersville
File number(s) of previous determinations associated with the site:
*Coordinates must be provided in decimal degrees ONLY.
Request Date: 01/15/2021
Longitude*:-80.8844
State: NC Zip Code: 28078
B. Property Owner Information (if there are multiple property owners, complete an additional owner sheet)
First Name: Jake Last Name: Palillo
Company Name (if applicable): South Creek Construction, LLC
Address: 18611 Starcreek Drive City: Cornelius State: NC Zip Code: 28031
Daytime Phone: [phone] Email: lpal iIlo(&aol.com
C. Requestor of Jurisdictional Determination/Delineation
First Name: Jake La
Company Name (if applicable): South Creek Construction,
st Name: Palillo
LLC
Same as Property Owner
Address: 18611 Starcreek Drive City: Cornelius State: NC Zip Code: 28031
Phone: [phone] Email: 1palillo(d-)aol.com
D. Agent Acting on Behalf of the Requestor (must include an agent authorization signed by requestor):
First Name: Daniel Last Name: Kuefler
Company Name (if applicable): Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Address: 10612-D Providence Road City: Charlotte State: NC Zip Code: 28277
Phone: [phone] Email: daniel.kuefler(cDwetlands-epg.com
Jurisdictional Determination Request for a Residential Developement
=Approved' Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
=Preliminary2Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
0 I am uncertain and request and require additional information to inform my decision
lApproved —An AJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, an AJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the presence or absence of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site, including their accurate location(s) and boundaries,
as well as their jurisdictional status. AJDs are valid for 5 years.
-2Preliminary—A PJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, a PJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the approximate location(s) and boundaries of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site that are presumed to be subject
to regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. Unlike an AJD, a PJD does not represent a definitive, official determination that there are, or that
there are not, jurisdictional aquatic resources on a site, and does not have an expiration date.
January 2020

IV. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (agents/environmental consultants only) — please list the number and date of all
figures/maps/datasheets included in the delineation report — all sources must be properly cited on the figure/map.
Delineation Map Figure 10 (9/15/20) FEMA/FIRM Maps
USGS Topo Figure 3 (9/15/20) USGS NHD
NRCS Soils Survey Figure a (9/15120) USGS HUC
USFWS NWI Navigable waters' study
Aerial Imagery Figure 2 (9/15/20)
Wetland Datasheet (data point labels) USACE Wetland Data Form (9115120), USACE Wetland Data Form Upland DP1 (9115120)
Photo Log Photos 1-4 (9/15/20)
Other sources: Vicinity Map (Figure 1, 9115120) ; Parcel Map (Figure 5, 9/15/20) ; DWR Stream Form DP2 (9/15120)
V. AGENT/REQUESTOR CERTIFICATION (agent or requestor listed in Section 1 (C) or (D) of this request)
By signing below, I certify that the information in this document and any attached documents is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.
Daniel K u e l e r
Digitally signed by Daniel Kuefler Daniel Kuefler 01/22/2021
Date: 2021.01.22 14:38:40-05'00'
Signature
Printed Name and Date
VI. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY (owner listed in Section 1(B) of this request - if there are multiple property owners, complete
an additional owner sheet)
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a
jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record or easement holder of the property identified
herein or have other legal or statutory authority to allow right -of entry onto this property.
Signature
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
Please use the Asheville Field
Office phone contacts for the
Charlotte Regulatory Field
Office until further notice
Please see attached
Printed Name and Date
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
General Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
General Number: [phone]
Add Aquatic Resource Table Add Additional Owner Sheet Add Agent Authorization Sheet Validate and Submit
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project
area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY
First Name: _fte&6 - Last Name
Company Name: South Creek Construction. LLC
Address: 6_k!L City:_
Phone: 0 _S6 v Email:_
Property PIN #(s) 00S3 1160 I cos-,o6 Ziia
Nvu o
State: NC Zip Code:
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein.
Signature A�11_
i 1 2-3 12,0- G
Date
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area
subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal. state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES WITHIN REVIEW AREA
Waters
Name
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Quantity
of
resources
in review
area
(number)
Measurement
Type
Cowardin
Code
Geographic
authority (i.e.,
404 and/or 10)
U.S. State
Rapanos
Waters Type
(For AJDS
only)
Wetland A
35.4442
-80.8843
0.009
acre
RP
404
NC
PrincipalPumose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to
federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a
public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),
which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor can a
jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

NCDEQ STREAM
FORM DP2
- 1.2
- r
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
'-
STUDY LIMITS
24
-h
a32,
USACE
_ �" �'••
UPLAND
DP1
3 �'•,,",
r
j }� WETLAND A
-0.009 AC 4
USACE
-73t7_ :: •'7.—
WETAND
w] �,$ _ 1 `„ ; ' 1�a_...
FORM A
o a ' �oi�i_.- • ' - � III
NEW" -
,__•
•.:
Acres:
SAM FURR —SENIOR APARTMENTS
Prepared for:
+/- 2.42
Mecklenburg Co., NC
South Creek
ConstrujBy:
FIGURE
10
Drawn By:
Reviewe
9115120
DELINEATION MAP
NRN
ALL
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
�'I '

V _ :�.27
41.
: \
16
is
PHOTO 3 - VIEW WETLAND A
DATE/TIME 2020:09:15 - 10:00:00 COORDINATES: 35.4442,-80.8843
PHOTO 4 -VIEW WETLAND A
DATE/TIME 2020:06:15 - 10:03:00 COORDINATES: 35.4441,-80.8884
Sam Furr— Senior Apartments
YVC PG Mecklenburg Co., NC — 9/15/20
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard 5_ Rindner, PLLC.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
9/15/20 1 Evaluator: I NRN/LSR
Eastin :
-80.8848
Project:
Sam Furr-Senior Apts: Non -Jurisdictional Swale DP2
Northing:
35.4453
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
6.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
0
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
4.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Hydrology Subtotal
2.5
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
0.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Sam Furr - Senoir Apartments City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/20
Applicant/Owner: South Creek Construction, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wetand A
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 8-15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4442 Long:-80.8843 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD2: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No x
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Feature has been heavily disturbed by open water pond construction.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 20
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetand A
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Acerrubrum
15 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 80 x 2 = 160
1.
Baccharis halimifolia
15 Yes
FACW
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 280 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X - revalence nde is . 1
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Bidens frondosa
15 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Polygonum pensylvanicum
15 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Impatiens capensis 15 Yes FACW
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
45 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wetand A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 5/2 60 7.5YR 5/8 40 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Sam Furr - Senoir Apartments City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/20
Applicant/Owner: South Creek Construction, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4442 Long:-80.8843 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD2: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nc
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
8-15
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Upland Data Point 1 was taken approximately 20' East of Wetland A.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Absolute
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
1.
Juniperus virginiana
45
Yes
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
35
Yes
3.
Ulmus alata
20
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
100
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Ulmus alata
30
Yes
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25
Yes
3.
Rubus argutus
20
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
75
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
,idicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2 (A)
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
25.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20
FACU
FAC
FACU
15
1. Allium vineale
20 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1. Lonicera japonica
55 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
FACU species 190 x 4 = 760
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 250 (A) 940 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.76
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ - revalence nde is . 1
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 5/8 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

a- J
i
O
Q
v
oC
22
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co m
For: Sam Furr Senior Apartments
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
Field investigation conducted on November 16, 2020
www.wetiands-epg.com
Ashesrile Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Sam Furr Senior Apartments site (+/- 2.42 acres) is located just north of Sam
Furr Road, and just east of Sedgebrook Lane in Huntersville, North Carolina. It
can be found on the Lake Norman South, NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Map- latitude is 35.4451 N, longitude is-80.8844 W. The topography consists of
gentle slopes, with the elevation ranging from 710 to 740 ft. (Figure 1). The site
is covered with disturbed, young mixed pines and hardwoods and includes a
small section of landscaped walking trail, strip buffer, and underground pipeline
right-of-way.
Figure 1:
CARP BUY
Marina
urnping
tation
1 } �
r 710 �� 1
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LI MITSIV
' N. 7 70
4C
LOCATION �5.7 � � MC DOWEL L CR E EK
Lat: 25.4451 N
Long: -10 1144 W U.SG5 QUAD
HL '2: 5"" Lake Norman South,NC SCALE
! UPPERCATAW6A 1993
I
67 5ArV1 FURRRDSENIORAPARiMENTS Pre Paredfor:
+ -2.42 B FPart Development
� Mecklenburg Ca., NC
FIG U RE
115G5 MAP [,fawn Et': Rev leveed et':
1 9/2V20 5 OXCE ro USA CEM IVE 4 �nPCOL RLIC ALL
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and
Protected species for Mecklenburg County North Carolina, the results of which
are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and
the site was investigated on November 16, 2020.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on November 16, 2020
Group Name Status Record Status
Invertebrate Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona Endangered Current
decorata
Invertebrate Rusty -patched Bumble Bee Endangered Historic
(Bombus affinis)
Vascular Plants Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea Endangered
laevi ata
Vascular Plants Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus Endangered
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) Endangered
Vertebrate Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis
septentrionalis)
Vertebrate Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus)
Threatened
Current
Current
Current
Probable/Potential
Protected under the Bald Current
and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Three plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally Endangered,
is typically found in open habitats which historically have been maintained by
wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most occurrences are limited to
roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry
limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring abundant sunlight and
little competition from other plant species.
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered, requires
habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species requires periodic fire
as a part of its ecology.
Four animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of open water
such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are suitable fish
populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
• Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt- free stream beds
are required for this species. Typically stable areas occur where the stream
banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally Threatened.
During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -
reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. It
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern
long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis), listed as Federally Endangered,
live in colonies that include a single queen and female workers. Rusty -patched
Bumble Bees historically occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies. Bumble
bees need areas that provide nectar and pollen from flowers, nesting sites
(underground and abandoned rodent cavities or clumps of grasses), and
overwintering sites for hibernating queens (undisturbed soil).
WEPG#00801 4
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
RESULTS:
The site is covered with disturbed, young mixed pines and hardwoods and
includes a small section of landscaped walking trail, strip buffer, and
underground pipeline right-of-way. The site is surrounded by landscaped ponds,
grounds, and trails of adjacent residential and commercial development. Aerial
photography records show most of the site was timbered and graded late 2006 /
early 2007.
The young, mixed tree species include Short -leaf Pine (Pinus echinata), Virginia
Pine (P. virginianus), Willow Oak (Quercus phellos), Southern Red Oak (Q.
falcata), Post Oak (Q. stellata), Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Tulip
Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Red Maple (Acer rubra), Red Cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), and American Holly (Ilex opaca).
The shrub layer is dominated by and Blackberry (Rubus spp.), and Chinese
Privet (Ligustrum sinense). Vines include Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
and Catbrier (Smilax sp.). Herbs include Panic Grass (Panicum sp.), Japanese
Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and Knotweed (Po/ygonum sp.).
Transitional areas along the tree lines are heavily landscaped and edged with turf
grass and the sparse, naturally growing herbs observed were Sericea Lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneata), Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), and Ragwort
(Packera sp.).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
The potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac and
Smooth Coneflower along the tree line were examined. This habitat is
heavily landscaped and managed, with little to no native vegetation
present. No individuals of Schweinitz's Sunflower or Michaux's Sumac
were observed. *at the time of the survey there had not yet been a killing
frost and plants were easily identifiable.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
• This site does not have suitable habitat to support populations of the
Carolina Heelsplitter.
Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the Northern
Long-eared Bat.
WEPG400801
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Range Map for Rusty -patched
Bumble Bee
(https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/rpbbmap.html)
Mecklenburg County is in its Historic Range, and as such, Section 7
consultation is not needed. WEPG concludes that Rusty -patched Bumble
Bee is not present.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
November 17, 2020
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 55,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora).
• Found Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
This discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This
population has become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in
Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina
WEPG#00801 7
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Figure 2: VICINTIY MAP
rp
William Amos o �`
Hough High School °va
• 15 �qfr
e epatCaldwell Ra p
SITE n E
3� "g& $' Local Cab Authorued
g odd d Driver Of Huntersville
go-
- � � ¢gar
av
s8"
Oakwood vhQ'`Ra �i S
Corporate Housing n
cp Y
Rd A �`��
�t m ��d9�` r.
DOT' �N
c m kNtcB eu
ice Academy . r 4 �, to �gJ
'too
r o �. Sunglass Hut
��pd � St,ngtoxa[•s atdo
H y
ova ra Start
p,��PRri ,4 Veclona'sWret
PROJECT BOUNDARY a I.ugerer vine.
once Inn by
At Charlotte Lake. STUDY LIMITS 0
Fargo Privale Bank Camden Sedgebrook So,f , Bwkd ate VHlage 9arnes 8 N
9 Apartments
Ta
`�Saf
aea�ierrbr {;]
D PROPOSED SEWER LINE ■
Midwood Smokehouse
^"y Chepolle M
f µ..xa • 11Nrery lakrae • ",ry y SWM Fu,, nd Q tj
4tj
Medi-Weighlloss A &
Hunlersville T
Coral Sushl
e yAew =' John D Wells, DDS, PA
O
Y
s
9
brie tix King Tiger Tae Kwon
` Do of Huntersville
a
5"00 Oakdale Golf Cluk
Fairways al Airkdale I
Acresi SA FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS Prepared for:
+ - 2 42 Bi-Part Development WEPG
� Mecklenburg Co., NC
FIGURE
2 VICINITY MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
911S120 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verlficavan SLK ALL
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Figure 3: USGS MAP
CORP BOY 78
Marina =Z=
U fTl I rl' _
tatMon
-X k _
PRDJE{TBOUWARY 1
— J 4 * I STUDY LIMITS ` r, }
{ r w� (
J /
ILI
T J_
LOCATION 4'} ME DOWEL L{REEK y■J
Lat: 35.4451 N r If
Long:-90.SS44 W USGS QUAD t
H U12: 03050101 Lake Norman South NC
UPPERCATAWBA 1993
Ace: SAM FU RR R D SE N IOR ARA RT MEN TS Preparedfor: 1
+t_2.42 Mecklenburg Cu., NC BpPartDevelaproent
WEPG
FIGURE
USGS MAP Drawn E?y: Reaiewed By:
3 9125{7{7 5ubecr10U54CEMIDE4u_enficaL;m RLR ALL
WEPG400801 9
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Figure 4: NRCS SOIL MAP
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Sam Furr Senior Apartments - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Figure 5: AERIAL MAP
- W-4111111111
CeD2 -
Gea2, w.►�s
GeD �y
A�
r„
eel' - t
PROJECT BOUNDARY
2
STUDY LIMITS
�--- .\ C eB t '
Y a$F' -4 - [l I
C*02 'k i E n R �.
I � T.1:Qi
Map Acres �A
Unit Map Unit Name in Percent -
9
ym6vl A01 of AOI
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay 2.3 95.3°I°
loam, 8 to 15°.
percent Slopes,`
moderately eroded \ F i i H
En❑ Enon sandy loam, 8 0.1 3.74,o
to 15 Percent
Slopes
Totals for Area of 2.4 100.00l0 MRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
r .
Interest r Mecklenburg County 1980 N
acres: SAM FURR RD SENIOR APARTMENTS Prepared for:
+ - 2 42 Bf-Part Development FPG
FIGURE
Mecklenburg Co., INC
5 SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
9�I5�2d Subject to US4CE/NCDE4 verification BILK ALL
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.