20111075 Ver 1_Application_20111209

Ja� VA
/ 1 �
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
Mr Bill Biddlecome
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889 1000
Dear Sir
A�€
Uh i a�
w,
EUGENE A Co
SECRETARY
December 6, 2011 111 ® 75
Mr Stephen Lane
Division of Coastal Management
N C Dept of Env & Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject
Application for an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification, Individual Section
404 permit and CAMA Mayor Permit for the construction of US 158 from the Murfreesboro
Bypass to US 13 west of Winton, Hertford County, TIP No R 2583 State Project No
6 079007T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways in
consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to widen and
construct new alignment of US 158 from the Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of
Winton The protect is approximately 8 1 miles in length
Included with this application are
• ENG Form 4345
• 413 and 4C Merger Process meeting minutes
• Permit Drawings
• NCEEP Mitigation Letter
• CAMA Mayor Permit Application Forms
10 Purpose and Need
The purpose and need for this Project, as identified in the State Environmental Assessment
(SEA), is to provide system linkage, support economic development and to ensure future
safety along the project limits
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699 1598
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
WEBSITE VM'W NCDOT ORG
LOCATION
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610 4328

2 0 Project Description
The proposed project will widen US 158 in Hertford County to a multi -lane facility from the
Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of Winton A four lane divided facility, consisting of
four 12 foot travel lanes paved shoulder and a 46 foot wide grassed median, is proposed
3 0 Summary of Impacts
Waters of the U S Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas of R 2583 total 3 43 acres of
permanent wetland impacts and 1,887 linear feet of permanent stream impacts See Table 1
for the permanent and temporary impact summary
4 0 Summary of Mitigation
This project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) throughout the design
process Compensatory wetland and stream mitigation will be provided by the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program (NCEEP) See attached letter
5 0 Project Schedule
This project is part of the NCDOT s Design Build Program Utility relocating is permitted
separately under a CAMA general permit and scheduled to begin in the spring of 2012 and
last approximately one year Roadway construction will be carried out concurrently with the
utility relocation and is scheduled to begin in summer 2012 and be completed the summer of
2013
6 0 NEPA Document Status
The State Environmental Assessment (SEA) was completed on April 27, 2006 The SEA
explains the purpose and need for the project, provides a description of the alternatives
considered, and characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects The SEA
was approved and circulated to federal, state and local agencies A State Finding of No
Significant Impact (SFONSI) was approved on June 3, 2008 Jurisdictional wetlands and
stream areas were verified and re venfied throughout the process The most recent re
verification by the USACE was in September 2011 Copies of the project documents have
been provided to regulatory review agencies involved in the approval process Additional
copies will be provided upon request
R 2583 has gone through the NEPA/404 merger process The 4A meeting was held on
January 17, 2008 The 4B and 4C meetings were held on July 20, 2011 and October 20,
2011, respectively
6 1 Independent Utility
R 2583 is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771 111(f) which lists the FHWA characteristics
of the independent utility of a project The project meets the criteria for independent utility
as discussed below
2

The project has logical termini and independent utility and is of sufficient length to
address environmental matters on a broad scope,
• The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure of funds, even if no additional
transportation improvements are made in the area, and
• The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably
foreseeable transportation improvements
7 0 Resource Status
The project is located in the Chowan River Basin USGS Hydrologic Unit 03040204,
NCDWQ Subbasm 03 01 02 Potecasi Creek ( NCDWQ Index No 25 -4 -8 9/6/79) and Mill
Branch ( NCDWQ Index No 25 4 8 11 9/6/79) are the only named streams within the
protect area Both named streams are classified as Class C Nutrient Sensitive Waters
(NSW) The unnamed tributaries to these streams have not been classified, unclassified
tributaries carry the same classification as the classified stream to which they are a tributary
No High Quality Waters (HQW), Waster Supplies (WS 1 undeveloped watersheds or WS
II predominately undeveloped watersheds), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur
within 10 mile of the project study area
7 1 Wetland Delineations
A wetland identification and preliminary assessment analysis for the study area was
performed and summarized in the September 2004 Natural Resources Technical Report
(NRTR) and January 2006 Addendum After the selection of the preferred Alternative the
wetlands within the preferred corridor were delineated based on the 1987 USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual A preliminary design was prepared to avoid and minimize wetlands to
the maximum extent possible This delineation was verified by the USACE, Wilmington
Distract on February 5, 2004 The project area was subsequently increased by approximately
50 acre and an Addendum to the NRTR was prepared in January 2006 A second JD was
issued by Bill Biddlecome of the USACE, Wilmington District on March 30, 2006
The jurisdictional areas within the corridor were again re evaluated based on a concern
raised after the July 2011 4B meeting The revised delineation was approved by Mr
Biddlecome in September 2011
Jurisdictional wetlands within the project area are shown on the attached permit plans and
described in detail in the SAE 2004 NRTR and 2006 Addendum
7 2 Stream Delineations
Stream assessments were included in the 2004 NRTR and 2006 Addendum These
assessments and delineations were approved by the USACE, Wilmington District in the
above discussed verifications

7 3 Characterization of Jurisdictional Sites
7 3 1 Wetlands
Six wetlands types were identified with the project corridor and described in the 2004
NRTR The wetlands vary in size, vegetation, hydrologic regime and location on the
landscape The below descriptions were taken from the 2004 NRTR
Pine Savanna Wetland
One site, this wetland type is composed of a monoculture of loblolly pine Sub canopy and
shrub layer are sparse and comprised of American holly, red maple and sweetgum This
wetland can be classified as Palustrine, forested wetland, needle - leaved evergreen,
intermittently flooded (PFO4C)
Headwater Ditch
These are jurisdictional ditches that either drain from jurisdictional wetlands or occur within
mapped hydric soil units On site, the ditches run through agricultural areas and pine
plantation They exhibit wetland vegetation, wetland hydrology and hydric soils These
wetlands can be classified as forest or scrub shrub broad - leaved deciduous (PFO1 C or
PSS1C)
Headwater Forest Wetland
Within the project corridor headwater wetlands generally begin as depression adjacent to
uplands that collect surface water Many begin at the discharge point of agricultural
drainage ditches Stream channels begin in these wetlands These wetlands can be classified
as palustrinre forest wetlands, broad leaved deciduous and needle leaved evergreen
(PFO1 /4C)
Swamp Forest Wetland
These wetlands are associated with steams They are frequently or permanently inundated
This wetland can be classified as palustrine forested wetland broad leaved deciduous
(PFO1 B /C)
Scrub Shrub Wetland
These are recently disturbed wetlands usually through timber harvesting activities These
wetlands can be classified as palustrine, shrub shrub wetlands broad leaved deciduous
(PSS1A/B)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetlands
The bottomland hardwood forests are typically associated with larger streams The canopy
is dominated by bald cypress These wetlands can be classified as palustrine, forested
wetland, road leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1 C)
Riparian Forest Wetlands
4

Riparian Forest wetlands are typically located in small depressions within the upland
floodplams of perennial streams These wetlands can be classified as palustrine, forested
wetlands, broad - leaved deciduous vegetation (PFO1B)
7 4 Impacts to Jurisdictional Resources
Impacts to jurisdictional resources resulting from the construction of R 2583 total 3 43 acres
of permanent wetland impacts and 1 887 linear feet of permanent stream impacts See
attached Table 1 for the impact summary and attached permit drawings for location of
impacts
8 0 Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened, Proposed
Endangered (PE) and proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7
and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended The United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (last update 09/22/2010) and the NVNHP (last updated 10/18/2011) list
one federally protected species for Hertford County
Common
Scientific
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Name
Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
Red cockaded
Picoides
E
Yes
No Effect
woodpecker
borealis
HDR and HARP personnel conducted a survey of the Study Area on December 10 and 11,
2003 Limited suitable habitat for the Red cockaded woodpecker was identified No
individuals or nest cavities of this species were observed during the site visit
8 1 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection act (BGPA)
In the July 9 2007 Federal Register (72 37346 37372), the bald eagle was declared
recovered and removed from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife This
removal took effect August 8 2007 After delistmg, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act (Eagle Act) (16 U S C 668 668d) becomes the primary law protecting bald eagles
Surveys for bald eagles were conducted concurrently with the RCW surveys No
individuals or nests were identified during the surveys This project will have no effect on
the bald eagle
9 0 Cultural Resources
The potential effect of the proposed R 2583 on cultural resources in the project area was
evaluated in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
as amended As described in Section E 2 of the SEA, three properties within the proposed
study area were determined eligible for the National Register However, the proposed
project will not result in an effect upon the eligible historic properties, The State Historic
Preservation Office concurs that the proposed project would not have an effect upon these
historic properties (See letter dated January 2006 in Appendix B of the SEA)
According to the Project Commitments (SFONSI Green Sheets Signed June 3 2008), an
archaeological commitment was made for data recovery on Site 31HF268 Data recovery

will be conducted by the Department Construction activities of any kind shall not take place
within Site 31 HF268 until all data recovery efforts have been completed by either the
NCDOT Archaeology Unit or one of their consultants Purchase of this property has been
initiated NCDOT will be notified once the acquisition is completed
If any previously unknown historic or archeological remains are discovered while
accomplishing the authorized work, NCDOT Staff Archaeologist and / or NCDOT Project
Development Engineer shall immediately notify, to initiate the required State /Federal
coordination
Two graves will be relocated as a result of the project (approximately Sta 295 +10 Lt and
360 +25 Rt) These graves will be relocated following applicable North Carolina Statutes
(i e NC GS 65 or NC GS 70, Article 3) and will be determined in consultation with the
NCDOT Archaeology Group
10 0 FEMA Compliance
The project has been coordinated with appropriate state and local agencies including the
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP) to assure compliance with FEMA
state and local floodway regulations
110 Mitigation Options
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to
avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of
all remaining unavoidable jurisdictional impacts Avoidance measures were taken during
the planning and NEPA compliance stages minimization measures were incorporated as
part of the project design
111 Avoidance and Minimization
All jurisdictional features were delineated, field verified and surveyed within the R 2583
corridor Using this information, preliminary designs were adjusted to avoid and /or
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas NCDOT employs many strategies to avoid and
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas in all of its designs Many of these strategies have
been incorporated into BMP documents that have been reviewed and approved by the
resource agencies and which will be followed throughout construction All wetland areas
not affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary encroachment Individual
avoidance and minimization items are as follows
• Staging of construction equipment or construction supplies will not be allowed in
wetlands or near surface waters
• The project was designed to avoid or minimize disturbance to aquatic life
movements
• BMP s will be implemented to minimize long term water quality impacts
• No excavation, fill or land clearing will occur within Water of the U S or other
jurisdictional area, except as authorized by the USACE The location and
on

characteristics of all borrow or waste sites will be documented All documentation
will be available to the USACE upon request
• No work will take place that will impact anadromous fish spring migration —
February 15 — June 15
• Crossings of jurisdictional areas were angled to cross as close to perpendicular as
possible
• Median widths were reduced to 46 feet
• The use of 3 1 fill slopes in jurisdictional areas
• The use of bridges verses culverts where practicable
• The use of hand clearing in jurisdictional areas where practicable
• Staged construction of all box culverts
• Lowered profile grade to reduce project footprint
112 Compensation
The NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest
extent possible as described above The 3 43 acres of unavoidable wetland impacts and
1 887 linear feet of unavoidable stream impacts will be offset through compensatory
mitigation from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) See
attached letter
12 0 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
Indirect and Cumulative Effects are discussed in Section H of the SEA The improved
roadway should prove an incentive for economic developments in Winton and Hertford
County by providing a four lane highway connection to Interstate 95 This improved
regional access is vital to the attraction of new industry and employment opportunities As
new industries and business establish other development may occur which may result in an
increased population and greater demand for housing Development along the corridor will
change the character of the area from rural to a more suburban setting The proposed
controlled access should limit land use changes and increase safety of the roadway As the
economy grows the low median income is expected to increase and poverty rates decrease
Existing land planning and development policies, the lack of access to new land the large
amount of rural land, limited availability of utilities outside developed areas, low population
growth and limited development pressure should limit the potential for induced growth to
further degrade water quality in the area
7

13 0 Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Application is hereby made for a USACE Individual 404 Permit as required for
the above described activities
Section 401 This letter serves as a request for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification
from the N C Division of Water Quality
CAMA Mayor Permit This letter serves as a request for a CAMA mayor permit
Please contact me with any questions
Enclosures
J
Thank you for your cooperation
Sincerely
U�
Gregory Thorpe PhD
Environmental Management Director PDEA

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
OMB APPROVAL NO 0710 -0003
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
EXPIRES 31 AUGUST 2012
33 CFR 32
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions searching
existing data sources gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense
Washington Headquarters Executive Services and Communications Directorate Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget Paperwork Reduction Project (0710 0003) Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 33 USC 403 Clean Water Act Section 404 33 USC 1344 Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries
Act Section 103 33 USC 1413 Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers Final Rule 33 CFR 320 332 Principal Purpose Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal state and local government agencies and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law Submission
of requested information is voluntary however if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued One set
of onginal drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and /or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity An application
that is not completed in full will be returned
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1 APPLICATION NO
2 FIELD OFFICE CODE
3 DATE RECEIVED
4 DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT)
5 APPLICANTS NAME
8 AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First Gregory Middle J Last Thorpe
First Robert Middle S Last Lepsic
Company North Carolina Department of Transportation
Company ARCADIS G&.M of NC Inc
E mail Address gthorpe @ncdot gov
E mail Address robert lepsic @arcadis us corn
6 APPLICANTS ADDRESS
9 AGENTS ADDRESS
Address 1598 Mail Service Center
Address 801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300
City Raleigh State NC Zip 27699 Country US
City Raleigh State NC Zip 27607 Country US
7 APPLICANTS PHONE NOs w /AREA CODE
10 AGENTS PHONE NOs WAREA CODE
a Residence b Business c Fax
a Residence b Business c Fax
919 707 6000
919 854 9812 919 854 -5448
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11 1 hereby authorize to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish upon request
supplemental information in support of this permit application
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12 PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
US 158 Widening from Murfreesboro to US 13 west of Winton
13 NAME OF WATERBODY IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
See Attached
Address
15 LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude N 036 24 21 09 Longitude W 076 59 35 56
City State Zip
16 OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality
Section Township Range
ENG FORM 4346 OCT 2010 EDITION OF OCT 2004 IS OBSOLETE Proponent CECw -OR

17 DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See Attached
18 Nature of Activity (Description of project include all features)
See Attached
19 Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the protect see instructions)
See Attached
USE BLOCKS 20 23 IF DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20 Reason(s) for Discharge
See Attached
21 Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
22 Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 3 43
or
Linear Feet l 887
23 Description of Avoidance Minimization and Compensation (see instructions)
See Attached
ENG FORM 4345 OCT 2010

24 Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? QYes QNo IF YES DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25 Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners Lessees Etc Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (ri more than can be ante ed h re p] ase attach a supplemental i sp
a Address See Attached
City State Zip
b Address
City State Zip
c Address
City State Zip
d Address
City State Zip
e Address
City State Zip
26 List of Other Certificates or Approvals /Denials received from other Federal State or Local Agencies for Work Described to This Application
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
See Attached
Would include but is not restricted to zoning budding and flood plain permits
27 Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authonze the work described in this application I certify that this information to this application is
complete and accurate I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work descnbed herein or am acting as the duly authonzed agent of the
applicant
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or It may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed
18 U S C Section 1001 provides that Whoever in any manner within the junsdictlon of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies conceals or covers up any trick scheme or disguises a material fact or makes any false fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry shall be fined not more than $10 000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both
ENG FORM 4345 OCT 2010

MEETING NOTES
Date July 20 2011
HNTB Project No 55694
Meeting Name R 2583 (Design Build) CP 4B Hydraulics Design Review Meeting
Location Structures Conference Room C
Purpose CP 4B Hydraulics Design Review Meeting
■
Attending David Wainwright NC DWO
Bill Zerman NCDOT Hydraulics
Bill Biddlecome USACE
Khaled Al Akhdar NCDOT TPMU
Cathy Brittingham DCM
Roger Rochelle NCDOT TPMU
Gary Jordan USFWS
Ron Wilkins NCDOT Utilities
Travis Wilson NCWRC
Chris Militscher USEPA
Jonathan Bivens ST Wooten
Mike Stephens ST Wooten
Michael Alford ST Wooten
Enrico Roque HNTB
James Byrd HNTB
Chris Manley NCDOT NEU
Chris Rivenbark NCDOT NEU
Phil Harris NCDOT NEU
Elizabeth Lusk NCDOT NEU
Mark Staley NCDOT REU
Benjamin Henegar HNTB
Bob Lepsic ARCADIS
The following is a summary of the discussions and decisions reached during the CP 4B Meeting held on
July 20 2011 for the US 158 Widening Design Build Project
• Introduction
• Khaled provided a brief project overview and introduced the Design Build Team
• James Byrd advised that schematic (red line) hydraulic designs would be reviewed on
screen as opposed to a marked up set of plans
• Byrd also advised that a majority of field work had been completed so HNTB has site photos
of many of the jurisdictional sites
• Byrd further advised that all pipes and culverts east of US158 Business under the main line
would be either filled with flowable material or removed and replaced with new crossings in
accordance with the Project Contract and as a result of Division requirements
Page 1 of 6

• L Sta 23+00+/
• Existing 42 CMP will be removed and replaced with a 42 RCP upstream and a 48
downstream
• The difference in pipe sizing between upstream and downstream is attributed to the
downstream pipe being buried 10 since the outfall is a JS The 48 RCP will be analyzed as
a 42 RCP to account for the buryment
• Upstream - Wetland WTT no JS
Ditches that drain towards the wetlands will be designed to taper out to zero depth
and stop short of the wetlands to allow for diffused flow
David Wainwright questioned how diffused flow would be obtained?
Byrd advised that as the ditch depth reduces towards 0 flow would begin to spill
out and flow over natural ground
o Downstream Wetland WSS JS SS
Riprap outlet protection will be placed on banks only
• L Sta 41 +00 +/
• Existing 36 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 36 RCP
• Upstream - no jurisdictional area
• Downstream Wetland WRR no JS
Roadside ditches will discharge directly into outfall
Outfall had no measured flow
• L Sta 95 +00 +/
o Existing 36 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 30 RCP
• Upstream - no jurisdictional area
• Downstream - Wetland WQQ no JS
The wetland currently shown on the plans has been filled by the property owner
The proposed project will not impact the wetland
• L Sta 148 +00 +/ (Stream SD Potecasi Creek Tributary 1)
• Existing 2 @ 12 x 6 RCBC will be removed and replaced with 2 @ 12 x 8 RCBC
• Potecasi Creek Tributary 1 is a FEMA Limited Detailed Study Stream and meets NCFMP MOA
criteria
• One of the reasons the existing RCBC is being upsized is so that the inverts can be buried
the minimum required depth of 10
• This site was reviewed in the field with DCM and the D B Team DCM claimed jurisdiction
downstream of US158 but not upstream
Page 2 of 6

o Upstream Wetland WPP
Ditch from back station will discharge directly into creek
■ Station ahead nprap toe protection is proposed to form a ditch with the fill slope
and existing ground
The D B Team understands that a large portion of the wetlands from L Sta 148 +00
to Sta 154 +00 (RT) will be impacted
o Downstream - Wetland WPP
The existing RCBC will be removed and the outfall channel excavated through the
roadway embankment
Riprap will be placed on the new channel banks but not in the stream bed
■ Bill Zerman questioned whether the RCBC outlet could be shifted to the west to
better align with the downstream channel
Byrd advised that the outlet location was set in conjunction with the proposed cul
de sac and any movement to the west would impact additional properties
L Sta 163 +00 +/
• Existing 18 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 18 RCP
• Upstream - no jurisdictional area
o Downstream - Linear Wetland WNN no JS
Bill Biddlecome advised that the linear wetlands will be revisited and confirmed
L Sta 168 +00 +/
• Existing 24 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 24 RCP
• Upstream - no jurisdictional area
o Downstream - Linear Wetland WMM no JS
Bill Biddlecome advised that the linear wetlands will be revisited and confirmed
L Sta 175 +00 +/
• Existing 42 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 48 RCP Upsizing is due to inverts
being buried the minimum required depth of 10
• Upstream - Wetland WLL and JS SO
o Downstream - Wetland WLL and JS SO
Chris Militscher questioned how the pipe alignment was set?
Byrd advised that since the existing pipe had to be removed the new pipe would be
installed in the same trench Byrd added that while the outlet alignment is not
directly downstream moving the pipe to the west would result in a more severe
outlet skew
Byrd advised that utility relocations at this site would be by direction bore
Page 3 of 6

• L Sta 178 +00 +/ (LT) - Wetland WKK
• Chris Militscher questioned the functionality of the wetland given that no jurisdictional
features are shown upstream or downstream
• Militscher also expressed safety concerns with proposed fill slopes in close proximity to the
roadway
• Cross sections from 177 +00 to 179 +50 were reviewed
• Militscher advised that std fill slopes should be used through this area
• L Sta 190 +00 +/
• Existing 48 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 48 RCP 48 RCP will be buried the
minimum required depth of 10
• Upstream Wetland WJJ and JS SC
o Downstream Wetland WJJ and JS SC
Byrd advised that utility relocations at this site would be by direction bore
• L Sta 209 +50 +/
• Existing 36 RCP will be removed and replaced with a 36 RCP The downstream portion of
the 36 RCP will be buried the minimum required depth of 10
• Upstream - No JS
o Downstream -JS SJ
■ Chris Militscher questioned whether this stream was spring fed since there is no
jurisdictional feature upstream
Byrd advised that this site had not been field investigated yet and added that a
spring would be looked for
• L Sta 219 +50 +/
• Byrd advised that this section of the project was on new location
• Byrd added that there was a small portion of JS under the roadway but that it does not
extend upstream or downstream
L Sta 239 +00 +/
• Upstream - Wetland WCC and JS SF
Byrd advised that this wetland will be a total take
• Downstream Wetland WCC and JS SF
■ Byrd advised that outlet pipe is at flat slope to minimize outlet velocities into
wetland
Page 4 of 6

• L Sta 242 +00 +/ (Stream SB Potecasi Creek)
• Byrd advised that the wetlands are being spanned by the proposed dual bridges
• Byrd added that there are no deck drains and that all bridge runoff is discharged outside
jurisdictional areas
• Potecasi Creek is a FEMA Limited Detailed Study Stream and meets NCFMP MOA criteria
• Byrd advised that the existing US158 bridge was being removed entirely and that the ground
behind the vertical abutments would be sloped back at 31 and riprapped
• This site was reviewed in the field with DCM and the D B Team DCM claimed jurisdiction on
this reach of the creek
• Cathy Bnttingham questioned the existing and proposed bridge lengths and clear distances
from the WSEL to the low chord
■ From a review of field survey and design data the existing US158 bridge has a
vertical clear distance of 115 while the proposed bridge crossings have a vertical
clearance of 16 4
• Byrd advised that the existing US158 bridge is 120 in length while the proposed crossings
are approximately 375 (US) & 330 (DS) respectively
• Byrd advised that the vertical clearances of proposed bridges were set to provide 2 of
freeboard from the design year storm ((50 yr) to the low chord or approximately 15 5
• Gary Jordan questioned whether any consideration had been given to removing all of the
roadway embankment for existing US158?
• Jonathan Bivens advised that there was a waterline in the fill that would require relocation if
the fill were removed so it was not considered
• L Sta 255 +50 +/ (LT) - Wetland WX
• Byrd advised that a proposed 18 RCP would discharge into the wetland
• Byrd added that there are no other jurisdictional features in the vicinity of this wetland
• L Sta 339 +50 +/
o Existing box culvert and 36 CMP extensions will be removed and replaced with a 30 RCP
o Upstream Wetland WG no JS
o Downstream - Linear Wetland WE no JS
As previously noted all linear wetlands will be revisited and confirmed
• L Sta 352 +00 +/ (Stream SA - Mill Branch)
• Byrd advised that the 4 existing box culverts will be removed and replaced with a
combination of box culvert and large concrete pipes
• Byrd added that 3 of the 4 box culverts were constructed in 1922 and extended in 1977
o This site was reviewed in the field with DCM and the D B Team DCM did not claim
jurisdiction
o Upstream and downstream - Wetland WD
Page 5 of 6

• L Sta 359 +50 +/
• Existing 24 RCP closed drainage system will be removed and replaced with a 36 RCP
system
• Upstream - Wetland WC no JS
Byrd advised that feature is the outfall from the Wackenhut Correctional facility
stormwater pond
Bill Biddlecome advised that his notes indicated that this is JS SP
• Downstream - No jurisdictional features
• L Sta 369 +50 +/
• Existing 18 RCP will be filled with flowable material Due to proposed roadway profile there
will not be a pipe outlet into this linear wetland
• Upstream - No jurisdictional features
• Downstream - Wetland WB
James Byrd advised that there were no additional jurisdictional impacts on the L Line or any of the Y
Lines Byrd added that the CP 4C Meeting is currently scheduled for October 20 2012
After the formal meeting concluded Khaled advise the D B Team that the Agencies are going to revisit
and verify all sites He added that the information from these verifications should be available sometime
in September Khaled was informed by the D B Team that a September date was unacceptable and
would create serious scheduling concerns
This is our understanding of items discussed and decisions reached Please contact us if there are
changes or additions
Submitted by
HNTB CORPORATION
James A Byrd PE
Hydraulics Manager
cc Attendees
Page 6 of 6

MEETING NOTES
Date October 20 2011
HNTB Project No 55694
Meeting Name R 2583 (Design Build) CP 4C Permit Drawing Review Meeting
Location Structures Conference Room C
Purpose CP 4C Permit Drawing Review Meeting
Attending David Wainwright NCDWQ
Bill Biddlecome USACE
Chandrakant Sura NCDOT CM
Gary Jordan USFWS
Travis Wilson NCWRC
Bob Capehart NCDOT -Div 1
Jonathan Bivens ST Wooten
Michael Alford ST Wooten
Enrico Roque HNTB
Phillip Rogers HNTB
HNT0
Bill Zerman NCDOT Hydraulics
Khaled Al Akhdar NCDOT TPMU
Kerry Morrow NCDOT TPB
Ron Wilkins NCDOT Utilities
Chris Manley NCDOT NEU
Chris Rivenbark NCDOT NEU
Mark Laugisch NCDOT REU
Mark Staley NCDOT REU
Benjamin Henegar HNTB
Robert Lepsic ARCADIS
The following is a summary of the discussions and decisions reached during the CP 4C Meeting held on
October 20 2011 for the US 158 Widening Design Build Project
• Introduction
o Khaled provided a brief overview and turned it over to the Design Build Team
• The Design Build Team provided revised hard copies of the Impact Summary Sheet
• Phillip Rogers stated that the main purpose of the revised Impact Summary Sheet is due to
the change in how permanent and temporary stream impacts were tabulated In general
temporary stream impact was added approximately 10 from the end of the rip rap outlet or
channel improvements In addition this change was also included in the permit drawings
presented at the meeting even though the previous copy provided to the agencies did not
include it
• Mr Rogers provided a brief summary of each permit site In addition agency questions and
concerns were discussed as noted below

• Site 1
o Mr Rogers discussed how lateral ditches that drain toward wetlands will be tapered down
to zero depth in order to diffuse flow before entering the wetlands In addition swale outlet
data has been provided on the permit drawings The same general approach is being used
at multiple sites There were no questions for this site
• Site 2
o Mr Wainwright asked about how stormwater is being treated before entering the culvert
through a 15 RCP Mr Henegar stated that most of the runoff will receive grass Swale
treatment before discharging into the box culvert Mr Henegar also noted that the
discharge would be relatively low (approximately 5 6 cfs) at this location
• Site 3
o Mr Wainwright inquired about the alignment of the proposed 48 RCP outlet as well as the
outlet velocity and the depth of the existing channel downstream Mr Henegar stated that
the Vio is 6 cfs and that the channel is approximately 1 ft deep The agencies agreed that
the proposed alignment is okay and no further action is required
• Site 4
o The question was asked as to why we are showing hand clearing in the existing easement
left of Sta 177 +50 Since the existing easement is already likely cleared in this location
Mr Rogers stated that some clearing appeared to be needed in this area based on survey
and that due to rounding to the nearest hundredth acre all of the wetland within the
easement was shown hatched as impact
• Site 5
o Mr Biddlecome inquired about why we are showing so much hand clearing right of Sta
190 +00 where we are proposing trenchless installation of utilities Mr Rogers stated that
hand clearing was shown to the limits of the PUE due the placement of overhead power
lines in this easement
• Site 6
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 7
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 8
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 9
o Mr Biddlecome inquired about utilizing hand clearing instead of mechanized clearing in the
wetland left of Sta 241 +00 Mr Bivens stated that he felt that it would be unlikely that the
D B team would be able to construct this area without mechanically clearing due to
topography

• Site 10
o An inquiry was made regarding the temporary work bridge vertical clearance It was also
stated that The D B team should coordinate with DCM concerning minimum horizontal and
vertical clearance since Potecasi Creek is often used for canoeing Mr Rogers stated that
the approximate work bridge elevation currently noted on the roadway profile sheet is 7 5
Mr Bivens stated that the work bridge design has not been finalized and that the D B team
will work to accommodate the required horizontal and vertical clearances
o Mr Biddlecome requested that the D B team account for mechanized clearing in the
wetlands where the proposed piers will be located in addition to the hand clearing already
shown These bridge impacts will be included as a note on the impact summary table
o Mr Capehart stated that the limits of hand clearing off the proposed bridges does not look
sufficient The current hand clearing limits are offset at 10 The D B team agreed with this
comment and will revise the hand clearing offset to 30
o Mr Jordan inquired about the proposed bridge length over Potecasi Creek as he recalled a
project commitment to a minimum bridge length of 390 Mr Rogers stated that the longer
of the two dual bridges is approximately 370 and that the design does span the wetland
Mr Bivens reiterated that the proposed profile has been lowered from the original design
and that this would make a difference in the estimated bridge length Gary stated that he
agrees that the intent was to span the wetlands which the D B team is accomplishing
however for future reference it may be better to define the toe of slope when setting span
commitments and also asked that NCDOT notify the agencies of any deviation from future
commitments
• Site 11
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 12
o Mr Wainwright requested that the D B team provide an additional scaled detail for this site
as well as other similar sites in order to show impacts more clearly The D B team agreed
to include this detail for a few sites as needed
• Site 13
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 14
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 15
o Mr Biddlecome requested that the area right of Sta 339 +00 include excavation in wetlands
where trenching will be required in order to install utilities It was also requested that
wetland impacts be shown accordingly for all similar sites The D B team agreed to revise
the permit drawings and update the impact summary accordingly

• Site 16
o There were no questions for this site
• Site 17
o There were no questions for this site
This is our understanding of items discussed and decisions reached Please contact us if there are
changes or additions
Submitted by
HNTB CORPORATION
Phillip E Rogers PE
Project Engineer
cc Attendees

®®M MP4
APPUCATION Mr
MaJor Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
)l 7w��-
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1 Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information r ' ` rw �a -P, Z
r
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
North Carolina Department Of Transportation ( Ncdot)
US 158 Widening from Murfreesboro to US 13 west of Winton
Applicant 1 First Name
MI
Last Name
Gregory
J
Thorpe
Applicant 2 First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 1 First Name
MI
If additional applicants please attach an additional page(s) with names listed
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
S
State
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No
FAX No
27699 1598
Wake
919 707
6000 ext
City
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
PDEA Century Center Budding A 1000 Birch Ridge Drive
Raleigh
NC
NC
27610
Email
Phone No 1
cdmanley @ncdot gov
27607 5073
2 Agent/Contractor Information 5
r
x r
ems
Business Name
Arcadis G &M Of Nc Inc
Agent/ Contractor 1 First Name
MI
Last Name
Robert
S
Lepsic
Agent/ Contractor 2 First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No 1
Phone No 2
27607 5073
919 854
9812 ext 195
919 854 1282
ext 195
FAX No
Contractor #
919 854 5448
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
robert lepsic @arcades us com
<Form continues on back>
252 808 2808 1 888 4RCOAST www nccoastalmanagement net

Form DCM MP 1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3` Project Location
Site Deschpt►on
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd #
Hertford
Highway 158
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Winton Township
NC
Phone No
Lot No (s) (if many attach additional page with list)
ext
N/A
a In which NC river basin is the project located?
b Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Chowan USGS HUC 03010204 NCDWQ SubBasin 03 01
Potecasi Creek
02
e
c Is the water body identified in (b) above natural or manmade?
d Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site
NNatural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Chowan River
e Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f If applicable list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes NNo
work falls within
powerline easement The vegetation was recently mowed Vegetation surrounding the easement is mature pine /hardwood
N/A
4
Site Deschpt►on
a
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft )
b Size of entire tract (sq ft )
Approximately 220 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to
UT 17 236 256 sq ft
Potecasi Creel and 280 and 5 450 linear feet of Potecasi
Potecasi Creek 16 045 761 sq ft and 6 850 245 6 ft sq
Creek
c
Size of individual lot(s)
d Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes please attach additional page with a list)
❑NHW or ❑NWL
e
Vegetation on tract
Three site within CAMA claimed public trust waters Site 1 (Site 2 on thew attached plans) is foresrted upstream and
downstream of US 158 The rest of the area is the US 158 roadway and the grassed maintained right of way Site 2 (Site
10 on the attached plans) is forested Site 3 (not shown on the attached plans is located on a maintained overhead
powerline easement The vegetation was recently mowed Vegetation surrounding the easement is mature pine /hardwood
forest
f
Man made features and uses now on tract
Site 1 US 158 and culvert Site 2 no manmade features Site 3 wooden power poles and the overhead powerline
g
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site
Adjacent land uses at all threes sites are forested
h
How does local government zone the tract?
i Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
RA 20 Residential
(Attach zoning compliance certificate if applicable)
NYes ❑No ❑NA
j
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes NNo
k
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes attach a copy NYes ❑No ❑NA
If yes by whom?
I
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes NNo ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
252 808 2808 1 888 4RCO AST www nccoasta[management net

Form DCM MP 1 (Page 3 of 5)
<Form continues on next page>
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(u) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (u) above has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation if available)
n Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
N/A
o Describe existing drinking water supply source
N/A
p Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems
N/A
5" Activities and lmpacts y ti 1 i x'�" 4� � �,�� e
"4 $ Ye -a`x q9F
a
Will the project be for commercial public or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑ Private/Comm unity
b
Give a brief description of purpose use and daily operations of the project when complete
The purpose and need for this Project as identified in the State Environmental Assessment (SEA) is to provide system
linkage support economic development and to ensure future safety along the project limits
c
Describe the proposed construction methodology types of construction equipment to be used during construction the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored
The construction area will be cleared then graded The appropriate base material will be placed and compacted Then the
new roadway surface will be layed down Equipment will be stored within the new road right of way Various roadway
construction equipment will be used including excavators graders pavers rollers dump trucks water trucks frontend
loaders crane etc See attached
d
List all development activities you propose
There will be no commercial or residential development on the sites New roadway storm culverts bridges and utility lines
will be constructed New roadway features will also be constructed including signs guardrail roadway shoulder etc
e
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project new work or both? New work
f
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 05 ❑Sq Ft or ®Acres
g
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement public accessway or other area ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state
The discharge will consist of clean sandy fill material associated with the roadway and utility construction The locations of
the fill are shown on the attached drawings
i
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
j
Is there any mitigation proposed? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes attach a mitigation proposal
252 808 2808 1 888 4RCOAST www nccoastaImanagement net

Form DCM MP 1 (Page 4 of 5)
<Form continues on back>
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6 s Additional Information
In addition'to this completed` application form (MP 1) the following items below if applicable must be submitted in'order for the application
package to be complete } Items (a) — (t) are always applicable to any major development application 'Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to I go perly prepare the required items below _t4 tir K �a S r
a A project narrative
b An accurate dated work plat (including plan view and cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale Please give the present status of the
proposed project Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work clearly indicate on maps plats drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed
c A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site
d A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties
e The appropriate application fee Check or money order made payable to DENR
f A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management
Name K tirt' W ' r � x Phone No,
Address r r
Name Phone No
Address
Name
Phone No _t
� Address'
g A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract Include permit numbers permittee and issuing dates
None
h Signed consultant or agent authorization form if applicable
i Wetland delineation if necessary
I A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas (Must be signed by property owner)
k A statement of compliance with the N C Environmental Policy Act (N C G S 113A 1 10) if necessary If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
7 Certification and Permission to Ente "r on Land � 2 I ,¢, 1) 1 -TM 44IN ,
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit
I certify that I am authorized to grant and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow up
monitoring of the project
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge
Date
Print Name
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project
®DCM MP 2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP 5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP 3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP 4 Structures Information
252 808 2808 1 888 4RCOAST www nccoastaimanagement net

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Mayor Permit Form DCM MP 1 Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project Please include all supplemental information
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and /or fill activities All values should be given in feet
1
Access
❑This section not applicable
a
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b Type of material to be excavated
Other
existing sandy clay loam under the UT to Potecasi Creek
Channel
(NLW or
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
Breakwater
(excluding
shoreline
NWL )
N/A
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked provide the
stabilization
Length
❑CW [—]SAV ❑SB
OWL 4760 ❑None
170
Width
The excavation is required to install the culvert and allow
positive drainage through the culvert
28
Avg Existing
2
NA
NA
Elev 15 1 ft
Depth
a
Location of disposal area
b Dimensions of disposal area
Excavate material will be utilized in the roadway slope of
N/A
Final Project
the project
c
NA
NA,
Elev 13 38 ft
Depth
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
1
EXCAVATION
❑This section not applicable
a
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b Type of material to be excavated
cubic yards
existing sandy clay loam under the UT to Potecasi Creek
620 cubic yards
c
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands /marsh
d High ground excavation in cubic yards
(CW) submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) shell bottom (SB)
N/A
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked provide the
number of square feet affected
❑CW [—]SAV ❑SB
OWL 4760 ❑None
(u) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas
The excavation is required to install the culvert and allow
positive drainage through the culvert
2
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
❑This section not applicable
a
Location of disposal area
b Dimensions of disposal area
Excavate material will be utilized in the roadway slope of
N/A
the project
c
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d 0) Will a disposal area be available for future mamtenance9
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
(u) If no attach a letter granting permission from the owner (u) If yes where?
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands /marsh
(CW) submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) shell bottom (SB)
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked provide the
number of square feet affected
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(u) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas
f (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ❑No [DNA
(u) If yes how much water area is affected?
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RCOAST www nccoastal management net revised 12/26/06

Fo6'o'tl'4 DCM MP -2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 2)
3 SHORELINESTABILIZATION , This sechoWnot applicable
(If development is a wood groin use MP 4 - Structures)
a Type of shoreline stabilization b Length
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater /Sill ❑Other Width
C Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL d Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL
e Type of stabilization material
g Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater /Sill Other
I Source of fill material
f (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
[]Yes ❑No ❑NA
(u) If yes state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information
h Type of fill material
F --
`
4 OTHER FILL CTIVITIES ; "�cY = This section not applicable
A
(Excluding Shoreline Stabdizafron) 4�4-' � ' I , I, � � t `' r{ k -
a h) Will fill material be brouaht to the site? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA b (t) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands /marsh (CW)
If yes
(u) Amount of material to be placed in the water aoarox 300
cubic yards
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 145 x 28
(iv) Purpose of fill
To provide a stable and solid base for the culvert
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) shell bottom (SB) or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked provide the
number of square feet affected
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 4.060 ❑None
(u) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas
To provide a stable and solid base for the culvert
5 GENERAL w
a How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b What type of construction equipment will be used (e g draglme
controlled? backhoe or hydraulic dredge)?
Fill material will be graded to a 3 1 slope and vegetation to prevent Excavator and dumptruck
erosion
c (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the protect? d (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to protect
[-]Yes ®No ❑NA site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(n) If yes explain what type and how they will be implemented (u) If yes explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RCOAST www nccoastalmanagement net revised 12/26/06
Applicant Name
IDate N
,� z tit
r
C
-
{
's---
Applicant Signature -�
`-
°Y
, ,Y
Protect Name
_
4� N
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RCOAST www nccoastalmanagement net revised 12/26/06

Form ON MP 5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit Form DCM MP 1 Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project Please include all supplemental information
1 BRIDGES $ ry ❑This section not applicable
a Is the proposed bridge b Water body to be crossed by bridge
❑Commercial ®Public/Govemment ❑Private /Community Unnamed tmbutary to Potecasi Creek and Potecasi Creek
c Type of bridge (construction material) d Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL
2 12 X8 reinforced concrete box culvert and modified bulb UT 2 45 ft NLW
tee girder bridge Poticasi Creek 8 0 ft NLW
e (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ❑Yes ®No
If yes
(u) Length of existing bridge
(w) Width of existing bridge
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge
(v) Will all or a part of the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
g Length of proposed bridge approx 300 ft
I Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No
If yes explain
f (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes
(u) Length of existing culvert
(iii) Width of existing culvert
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL
(v) Will all or a part of the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h Width of proposed bridge 2 spans 70 ft each
t Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? []Yes ®No
If yes explain
k Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge approx 18 0 1 Have you contacted the U S Coast Guard concerning their
ft approval? ❑Yes ®No
If yes explain
m Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n Height of proposed bridge above wetlands approx 15 ft
waters? ®Yes ❑No
If yes explain Wetlands are located adjacent and to the
east of Potecasi Creek The bridge will span the wetlands
Therefore not result in an impact to the wetlands
2 "CULVERTS X � * "� 4 �S fiz r -40 This section not apph ' b/e
�< _r
a Number of culverts proposed 2
b Water body in which the culvert is to be placed
UT to Potecasi Creek
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RCOAST www ncc02st2lm2n2gement net revised 10126/06

FE9@"1'4'1 ®CM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
c Type of culvert (construction material)
Reinforced concrete box culvert
d (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
< Form continues on back>
[]Yes ®No
If yes
(n) Length of existing bridge
(ni) Width of existing bridge
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge _
(v) Will all or a part of the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f Length of proposed culvert approx 170 ft
h Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL
53ftNWL
Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes explain
e (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
®Yes ❑No
If yes
(n) Length of existing culvert(s) approx 88 ft
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s) 12 ft
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL 1 5 NWL
(v) Will all or a part of the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) All The roadway alignment will be shifted to
the south The old roadway and culvert will be
removed in order to construct the new roadway
9 Width of proposed culvert 2 at 12 wide
I Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour
1Oft
k Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
If yes explain
❑Yes ®No
3 EXCAVATION and FILL f 7 -, _ � d tt �V ❑This section not applicable
-'
a (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ®Yes []No
If yes
(n) Avg length of area to be excavated 170 ft
(iii) Avg width of area to be excavated 28 ft
(iv) Avg depth of area to be excavated 3 5 ft
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards 620 cy
b (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands /marsh (CW) submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV) shell bottom (SB) or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked provide the number of square
feet affected
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
®WL 75 soft ❑None
(n) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas
The excavation is required to install the culver and allow
positive drainage through the culvert
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RCOAST www nccoastal management net revised 10126/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
c (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high ground excavation? ❑Yes ®No
If yes
(n) Avg length of area to be excavated
(m) Avg width of area to be excavated
(iv) Avg depth of area to be excavated
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards
d If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation please complete the following
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area Excavated material will be utilized in the roadway slopes of the project
e
9
(n) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area N/A
(ni) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ❑No (If no attach a letter granting permission from the owner)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands /marsh (CW) submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) other wetlands (WL) or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked give dimensions if different from (n) above
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes give dimensions if different from (n) above
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes
(n) Avg length of area to be filled 145
(iii) Avg width of area to be filled 28
(iv) Purpose of fill To provide a stable and solid base for
the culvert
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high ground? ❑Yes ®No
If yes
(n) Avg length of area to be filled
(m) Avg width of area to be filled
(rv) Purpose of fill
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands /marsh (CW) submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV) shell bottom (SB) or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked provide the number of square
feet affected
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 4,060 ❑None
(n) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas
To provide a stable and solid base for the culvert
4 GENERAL'
r 'tea. w 4 -� — tt a 3 s
a
Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes explain Utilities will be relocated to within the new
road right of way This work is covered under a CAMA
General Permit
b Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes explain
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RCOAST www nccoastalmanagement net revised 10/26106

Form DCM MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities please attach a copy of the
approval or certification
< Form continues on back>
Will the proposed project require any work channels'? d How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes complete Form DCM MP 2 Excavated material will be immediately hauled from the site
for use elsewhere on the project If the material is to be
temporarily stored on site silt fence will be installed
around the material until it is hauled off Fill material
will be stabalized by grading it to a 3 1 slope and
seeding it after installation
What type of construction equipment will be used (for example f Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
draglme backhoe or hydraulic dredge)? ❑Yes ®No
Culvert construction excavator and dumptrucks If yes explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
Bridge construction Crane excavator piledriver and environmental impacts
dumptrucks
g Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes complete form MP 2 Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RC®A,SY www nccoastatmanagement net revised 10126/06
bate
Name
Project
Applicant Name
a ��� `
r 0
Applicant Signature
r
m a
252 808 2808 1 888- 4RC®A,SY www nccoastatmanagement net revised 10126/06

US 158 Widening from Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of Winton
Additional Information
a Project Narrative
The proposed project will widen US 158 in Hertford County to a multi lane facility from the
Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 west of Winton A four lane divided facility consisting of four 12 foot
travel lanes paved shoulder and a 46 foot wide grassed median is proposed
Two on site meetings were held with Stephen Lane Coastal Management Representative one on June
28 2011 during the utility work phase The second meeting was help on November 8 2011 and was the
pre application meeting for the entire project At the June meeting it was determined that two public
trust waters exist on site Poticasi Creek and an unnamed tributary to Potecasi Creek A permit
application was submitted for the early utility work within these areas and authorization was received in
November 2011 This permit application is for the remaining work The proposed roadway design will
affect two public trust waters at a total of three sites
Site 1(Site 2 on the attached permit drawings) is located on an unnamed tributary to Potecasi Creek
Work at Site 1 consists of the construction of the new roadway and the installation of 2 12 by 8
reinforced concrete box culverts The existing culvert will be removed restoring the channel The
stream banks at this location will be armored with rip rap The resulting public trust water impacts are
230 feet of permanent impacts and 20 feet of temporary impacts
Site 2 (Site 10 on the attached permit drawings) is located on Potecasi Creek Work at this location will
consist of the construction of an approximately 300 foot long bridge over Potecasi Creek The bottom of
the bridge girders will be 18 feet above the average water surface elevation Pier supports will not be
installed within the creek channel A temporary work bridge will be installed at Site 2 to construct the
permanent bridge The bottom of the temporary bridge will be approximately 7 feet above the average
water surface of Potecasi Creek The temporary bridge deck will not extend completely across Potecasi
Creek A ten foot opening will be maintained on the west end to provide boating access through the
construction area Because the permanent bridge is spanning Potecasi Creek and no support piers are
being installed within the creek channel there will be no permanent impacts to public trust waters The
temporary construction bridge will not result in temporary boating access impacts to Potecasi Creek
given the fact that access will be maintained upstream and downstream of Potecasi Creek
Site 3 (not shown on the attached permit drawings) is located on Potecasi Creek approximately 2 600
feet northeast of Site 2 Work at this location consist of the relocation of an overhear power line This
work was authorized by CAMA in November 2011
All other areas of impact are shown on the attached permit drawings Also attached is a list of the
property owners and parcel numbers where the impacts will occur and a jurisdictional area impact
summary table
1

CONSTRUCTION METHODS
b Status of Proposed Project
Construction has not been initiated on any portion of the project Construction cannot commence until
all regulatory agency authorization has been obtained as well as property and easement acquisition
completed
c Location Map
A location map is attached
d Deed
The attached table presents the property owners names addresses deed book and page number and
county PIN number Prior to commencement of any portion of the work all required properties and
easements will be acquired
e Application Fee
Authorization to debit the $475 Permit Application Fee from WBS Element 3580111 is hereby given
f Adjacent Landowners
The adjacent landowners have been contacted regarding this project and permit application Land
owners were also contacted during the planning phase of the project Public meeting were held as part
of the NEPA process
g Previous Permits Issued for the Work
CAMA issued a permit to conduct the upland utility relocation at Site 3
h Signed Agent Authorization From
A signed authorization form is attached
i Wetland Delineation
A wetland delineation was conducted in the area Agency verified wetlands are shown on the plan
sheets Verification letters and memos are included in the State Environmental Assessment
Signed AEC Hazard Notice
A signed AEC hazard notice is not required The project is not located in an oceanfront or inlet area
k Statement of Compliance with N C Environmental Policy Act
A State Finding of No Significant Impact was signed on June 3 2008 A copy is attached
2

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTIVENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
December 6 2011
PROPERTY OWNER
To be mailed to the attached list
Dear Landowner
EUGENE A CONTI JR
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to widen US 158 from
Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton This project crosses public trust waters, as
defined by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and must be
approved by the DCM under provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
One of the prerequisites to this approval is that adjacent riparian landowners be given an
opportunity to comment on the proposal A vicinity map and site drawings are enclosed for
your review
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal The work planned is depicted in the attached drawing If you have no objections
to the proposal, please return the form with your response within 30 days to this office If
you do have objections to the project please forward your comments to
Enclosures
cc Stephen Lane NCDCM
File U 3810
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699 1598
Mr Stephen Lane
N C Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Thank you for your cooperation
Sincerely
Gregory J Thorpe PhD
Environmental Management Director PDEA
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
WEBSITE WWW NCDOT ORG
LOCATION
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610 -4328

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(US 158 from Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton)
TIP Project No R 2583
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management Mayor Development Permit approval
procedures require that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed
development in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) be given thirty (30) days in which
to comment on the proposed development This form allows the adjacent riparian
landowner to express either (1) that he /she objects to the project or (2) that he /she does
not object and desires to waive his /her right to the 30 day period so that the processing of
the application can progress more rapidly Of course the adjacent riparian landowner need
not sign this form at all if he /she so chooses
I am an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware
of the North Carolina Department of Transportations plans for widening US 158 from
Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of Winton Hertford County North Carolina I am
further aware that this work will occur in one or more Areas of Environmental Concern and
therefore will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance
with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and
hereby waive that right of objection as provided in General
Statute 113 229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my
comments are attached
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner
Phone Number with Area Code
2
Date

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action I1 200411102 County Hertford U S G S Quad. Murfreesboro, NC
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property OwnenAgent NCDOT, Greeory J Thorpe, Ph,D
Address Environmental Management Director, PDEA
1548 Marl Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1548
Telephone No [phone]
Property description.
Size (acres) Addendum Area 52 acres Nearest Town Murfreesboro & Winton
Nearest Waterway Potecasi Creek River Basin Chowan
USGS HUC 03010204 &03010203 Coordinates N 36 4091931 W 77 0083175
Location description Note - This JD IS an addendum to a previous JD that was approved and signed on 2/5/2004 for
TIP # R 2583 The additional proiect area is approximately 4800 -feet long (9 miles) and vanes in width from
approximately 800 -feet wide on the westerly portion to less than 100 -feet wide where It toms up with the previous
proiect areas Previous wetland areas WBB WZ, and WU have been deleted and wetland areas WY and WX were
shthtly altered Stream SF was changed from Perenial to intermittent. The addendum project area is adjacent to an
unnamed tnbutary to Potecam Creek and Potecast Creek
Indicate Which of the Follow= Apply
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1)
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Rarbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations tits determination may be relied upon for a penod not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
— We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtam a consultant To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps
X The waters of the U S including wetland on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA junsdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the
Permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change m the law or our
Published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Elizabeth City NC at (252) 264 -3901 to determine
their requirements
Page 1 of 2

Action ID 200411102
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bill Biddlecome at [phone] eat. 26
C Basis For Determination
This site exhibits wetland cntena as described in the 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual and is part of a broad
continuum of wetlands connected to Potecasi Creek, a tributary to the Meherrm River which is a tributary to the
Chowan River
D Remarks
Cross reference action I.D (JD) # 200411102 dated 2/5/2004, and action Im #200211081
E Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division Office at the Following
address
Mr Michael F Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD ET CO R
U S Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by May 30, 2006
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination m tins
correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official
Date 03/30/2006 Expiration Date 03/30/2011
Copy famished
John Jamison
BDR Engmeermg Inc of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive Suite 207
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 4845
Page 2 of 2

PARCELNO
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NAMES ADDRESSES
404 MAPLE ST MURFREESBORO NC 27855
74
JESSE E VAUGHAN
105 COLLIN RD MURFREESBORO NC 27855
72
FENTON BLOUNT FERGUSON EST
609 CHOWAN ST MURFREESBORO NC 27855
77
ANN V WEATHERSBEE
915 US 158 WEST MURFREESBORO NC 27855
81
ROBERT B HARRELL
507 SPRING AVE MURFREESBORO NC 27855
82
SELMA V MAJETTE
816 US 158 WEST AHOSKI NC 27910
88
TILMAN VAN HAND Jr
815 US 158 W AHOSKIE NC 27910
83
TALL COTTON STABLES INC
RT 1 BOX 3838 MURFREESBORO NC 27855
89
E R EVANS &SONS INC
434 E WOODROW SCHOOL RD MURFREESBORO NC 27855
90
JOHN C JONES
PO BOX 368 AHOSKIE NC 27910
95
CARNEY GATLING
35 PRINCESS AVE MARLTIN NJ 8053
96
LEONE & VERNON STEPHENSON
31 SPRUCE ST BRIDGETON NJ 8302
105
TOWN OF WINTON
PO BOX 134 WINTON NC 27986
117
CHERRY F GODWIN
407 US 158 WEST AHOSKIE NC 27910
119
DARRELL T BRACY
432 US 158 W AHOSIKE NC 27910
120
WACKENHUT CORRECTIONS CORP
621 N W 53RD ST SUITE 700 BOCA RATON FL 33487
121
ALBERT T BEVERLY
311 US 158 WEST WINTON NC 27986
HERTFORD COUNTY
PROJECT R 2583
US 158 WIDENING FROM
MURFREESBORO BYPASS
TO US 13 WEST OF WINTON
SHEET OF 10/3/11
4
JOSEPH E DIXON
404 MAPLE ST MURFREESBORO NC 27855
74
JESSE E VAUGHAN
105 COLLIN RD MURFREESBORO NC 27855
72
FENTON BLOUNT FERGUSON EST
609 CHOWAN ST MURFREESBORO NC 27855
77
ANN V WEATHERSBEE
915 US 158 WEST MURFREESBORO NC 27855
81
ROBERT B HARRELL
507 SPRING AVE MURFREESBORO NC 27855
82
SELMA V MAJETTE
816 US 158 WEST AHOSKI NC 27910
88
TILMAN VAN HAND Jr
815 US 158 W AHOSKIE NC 27910
83
TALL COTTON STABLES INC
RT 1 BOX 3838 MURFREESBORO NC 27855
89
E R EVANS &SONS INC
434 E WOODROW SCHOOL RD MURFREESBORO NC 27855
90
JOHN C JONES
PO BOX 368 AHOSKIE NC 27910
95
CARNEY GATLING
35 PRINCESS AVE MARLTIN NJ 8053
96
LEONE & VERNON STEPHENSON
31 SPRUCE ST BRIDGETON NJ 8302
105
TOWN OF WINTON
PO BOX 134 WINTON NC 27986
117
CHERRY F GODWIN
407 US 158 WEST AHOSKIE NC 27910
119
DARRELL T BRACY
432 US 158 W AHOSIKE NC 27910
120
WACKENHUT CORRECTIONS CORP
621 N W 53RD ST SUITE 700 BOCA RATON FL 33487
121
ALBERT T BEVERLY
311 US 158 WEST WINTON NC 27986

4 04 27 PM
\dm 8159\ 2583 p m p h 230 dg
A /17 /49
MATCH
LINE
TO
SHEET
22
STA
238+00
I
I
nN
m
5121
O
Y
IGT
A
O
m0
240 �
i
N
�
\ I
15
CP III
n
°
15
RCP III
� I
I w
%
p
NAD 83
I
UD
O
jm
m
g ��
1 \
E\
pm
rn T5 is_
'
0
slt
/ k
/
'
/
m tin
245
4
/
om
�a
om
n
\
v
v
�
m
z (7 cn
a
m o z
nz oy mo �oz
mo
o
O �7
� m�
c+
S
z z= r Dv
z 'N
Z
250
/
P
ma ,3
pZO
y
coi
w m
z
/ o
MATCH
LINE
TO
SHEET
24
s
STA
251
+00
ar IT

i
1
I
A 09 47 PM I
c Qd 815559\ 2255833 pIm p h 238 dg
REVISIONS
ji
MATCH LINE TO SHEET 22
STA 238+00
u
/ ✓ I // , / /- -�� / I IIII
/ ` �'�� - - - - - --
o
\\ \ \am P�`
O a
\ \\
m \VN
\ v s o VAS v A l r
1/ ,/ a I it l l la � i � oz �,/
�� rvv rvvvQ �v v VAvA�0 v y /r / /��/ V��1 X111 A \/
O\ "I \ \ A \\ \ \ , / II \
a an I t A\ \ i� //r / 11/ A(
oz
o
N // s
Pr�� I ICI
1 / 15
RCP III
\ \ \J
� - /
�(ilfl)r, I / �i I�XD\ 83 - -7 i l
a- __,
1111ii L I �� _ g3 /
rr
-; __ --- \\ l � •� 7111//
/// -�\ r \vv \�� / / ✓I I vll/
// i! -
�� b o/ e ��1) /� / jrll / / ✓1v
✓ � O l � / �\ Jj! // / � ��� rl �l1/
f ✓ V /ll // / l lll�l Ir llq
T 1 i
A { 245 P/ 11111 llj l'� �I
If
- /i\ \\ I I // \i / a m r / I / llk ✓l I / l�� I l l /� \ I \
/--
I l /
/r r 6- l / l/ l {7/ l I/l ll / / // /II�
I //w £
It
mo
lc
l�hll
�1 / / /// //l �l ✓i��
l�I l✓ // / 1
om \ I I A�`
/
\
VJIIv ���\
� \ I \1111 \ I / j �� � I , �.__ —✓ � `\ 1� 3 /!l �l� II I/f /ll �r/ / I � \
V1 v - - - - -- g
m — — I rrl� I / / / / / ✓�� f C7
/ / I I roa �� ���, -- 0.r"' \ // // // / ✓ �/ /// / 1 D
a
/ // rn I I ��/ I o 11 /l //r �� j ll� ✓l/ l/ A m
r"
/ c o _ I ns I 11%111 l r� �l!l / ✓j /! 1\ p z C� Cn
/ o m m �; l
/ nz o o �z — — I I m o 1l ✓Ull l/
ro 0, E,q mo A _ — T- m I l ll ✓/ 1 �7
m� nm rrFn D­ o v n� I /// / )! O
/ Dm r _§n nm m om 1 \ / / I // / co
E 3 A; 1 \ 7 Il)I/ �l / l�l'l/ / / z x O
or-
MD
'I
IN �^ I ( —� M l 1�l Illy I /// ° y m
° z /II s l�Jl/ 111 l ✓il l 1 Ill / / z O Z
>!f / / /%/
Y I_ L 250 f��i l ///
ll l �ll ���
/�lll /I S 2j-
\A, o
Ill l ll!l �l it Il /61/ \\�
,
n1 f I n �lll
/ o c, � � z
/ ) , m
o
o �I MATCH LINE TO SHEET 24
z STA 251 + 00
�I
�r
Zo
z
O

r
c
c
c
I
z
c
n
0
I
c
z
c
I
u
c