Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120010 Ver 1_Email_20120117FW U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 FW U -3459 DWQ project no 12 -0010 Euless, Amy Sent Tuesday January 17 2012 1 26 PM To Carrillo Sonia Attachments U 3459 PCN Page 5_rev010612 pdf (104 KB) Please add the email and the attachment 12 0010 Thanks Amy From White, Ryan L Page 1 of 2 Sent Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1 24 PM ' To Euliss, Amy Cc paul koch @stantec corn Subject RE U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 Effective Immediately my phone number is now 919 707 4717 Ryan L White P E Rail Project Development Engineer NCDOT Rail Division Environmental and Planning Branch 919 7074717 rlwhite @ncdot gov From Euless, Amy Sent Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1 24 PM To White, Ryan L Cc paul koch @stantec com Subject RE U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 Okay thanks Can you send me the updated sheets of the PCN2 Amy From White, Ryan L Sent Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1 17 PM To Euliss Amy Cc paul koch @stantec com Subject RE U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 Amy Alignment — The existing alignment is constrained by the tie in to A Avenue on the north end and an ephemeral channel and culvert dust west of and parallel to the proposed roadway The ephemeral channel drains the area north of Boundary Street and runs into Town Creek Investigation of the isolated wetland revealed that the wetland exists due to berm creation and fill areas deposited by past earthwork disturbance/ clearance/ building demolition on this industrial site Even of the proposed roadway footprint does not directly impact the wetland it is predicted that any immediately adjacent site disturbance would likely alter these fell areas and drain the wetland Therefore to completely avoid the wetland the alignment would need to be shifted significantly west which would make the alignment unfeasible for its northern tie in would place fill in the ephemeral channel and would require relocating the culvert under boundary street Wetland impact The wetland was reflected as a total take as the area of impact (0 17 acres) is equal to the total area of the wetland as shown in the form To clarify we have added a total take description to Part C line 2h The revised page is attached https //ma11 nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &1d= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJH14 %2bm 1/20/2012 FW U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 Effective Immediately my phone number is now 919 707 4717 Ryan L White P E Rail Project Development Engineer NCDOT Rail Division Environmental and Planning Branch 919 707 4717 r1whrte(@ncdot gov From Euliss, Amy Sent Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1145 AM To White Ryan L Subject RE U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 Page 2 of 2 Ryan 1 II need the additional information detailed below within a week If I don t receive it 1 II have to officially put the application on hold Amy From Euliss, Amy Sent Thursday, January 05, 2012 2 58 PM To White Ryan L Cc Carrillo, Sonia Subject U 3459 DWQ project no 12 0010 Ryan I need more information regarding Avoidance and Minimization for the Klumac Road relocation Could you please explain why the road couldn t be shifted slightly to the west in order to avoid the wetland? Also the wetland should be considered a total take Please update the impact tables to reflect this You can send me this information via email Let me know if you have any questions Amy Please note my new email address amy euliss @ncdenr gov Amy Euliss NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality Surface Water Protection 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Voice (336) 771 5000 FAX (336) 771 4630 Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties t https //mail nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &id= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJH14 %2bm 1/20/2012 C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ® Wetlands ❑ Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404 other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ❑ T Fill /Mechanized Land Clearing Isolated ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Corps ® DWQ 0 17 ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W2 []PMT ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g Total wetland impacts 017 2h Comments Wetland impacts reflect a total take of the 0 17 acre isolated wetland 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including tempd'rary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non 404 width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P ❑ T n/a n/a ❑ PER ❑ INT ❑ Corps ❑ DWQ n/a nla S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ INT ❑ Corps ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts n/a 31 Comments n/a Page 5 of 11 PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version