20181397 Ver 1_Final Mitigation Plans_20210203

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20181397 Version* 1
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 02/03/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -2/3/2021
.........................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
rJ Stream r Wetlands rJ Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matt Butler [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20181397 Version:*1
Existing!DI Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS Cr Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Feed and Seed Mitigation Site
County: Randolph
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: FeedandSeed_FinalMitPlan_Submittal.pdf 82.36MB
Rease upload only one R7Fof the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Matt Butler
Signature:*

3600 Glenwood Ave.,Suite 100
Or es Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
December 16,2020
Samantha Dailey
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Dr.,Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
Subject:Cape Fear 03 UMBI Feed and Seed Final Mitigation Plan Submittal(SAW-2018-01637)
Dear Ms.Dailey,
On behalf of Resource Environmental Solutions(RES)&Environmental Banc&Exchange,LLC(a RES affiliate),I
am pleased to submit the Final Mitigation Plan for the Feed& Seed Site, the initial site for the RES Cape Fear 03
Umbrella Mitigation Bank.A prospectus was submitted in January 2019,put on public notice on March 13,2019,and
issued an initial evaluation letter on April 17,2019.The draft mitigation plan was submitted in March 2020.
The attached plan includes minor modifications from the draft mitigation plan to incorporate suggestions from the
IRT Draft Plan Comment Memo dated on August 14,2020. The minor alterations and updates are detailed below:
• The final mitigation plan presents 2,489.200 SMUs(2,828.200 in the draft mitigation plan);
• RES has provided a cross-walk outlining reach ID changes in the JD(Appendix D);
• Reach RD1-A restoration was reduced from 400 LF (Draft Mitigation Plan) to 174 LF (Final Mitigation
Plan);
• Reach RD2-B EII has been increased from 337 LF(Draft Mitigation Plan)to 588 LF(Final Mitigation Plan);
• The Functional Uplift Section has been revised heavily in response to IRT comments. Functional uplift is
presented more directly and is consistent with the uplift potential of the proposed restoration and
enhancement activities;
• RES has supplied an updated JD with an updated aquatic resource inventory table and Waters of the US Map
based on survey data.
Thank you for your time and consideration for this Project and we look forward to our continued work together as this
Project progresses. Please contact me at 919-770-5573 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any
additional information.
Sincerely,
0,/ /44
Matt Butler
Project Manager
res.us

W.
ass:
§ S_
. +- ! I �, " .. ,I-. �I �, , ?oil.. . f
n
® , 4 'fp, i -4. '0 �.+.P3� ,eye �,.cam'»-5'�'+ y�v bb' � -
t `'5 Iry , ' '�^�; fir /
� �
-e, - s {' Y .s "' ,y _ may,
�a tea , ``�,,
+
40-
%^p C . ..�s�'�`+ ! .,`-9� y' s :1,(YF �'^a Y},.w.�r wh }y -t.,
`+ a,", a k
u s� �
40-
f ;
i
Final Mitigation Plan
Feed and Seed Mitigation Site
RES Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank I USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-01637
Cape Fear Basin I HUC 03030003 I Randolph County,North Carolina
December 2020
Prepared By: Bank Sponsor:
Resource Environmental Solutions LLC Environmental Banc&Exchange LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27612
919-209-1052
"This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation
and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section§332.8 paragraphs(c)(2)through(c)(14)."

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Components 1
1.2 Project Outcomes 1
2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION 2
2.1 Site Selection 2
3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 4
3.1 Watershed Summary Information 4
3.2 Landscape Characteristics 4
3.3 Land Use -Historic,Current,and Future 7
3.4 Reach Summary Information 7
3.5 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints 9
4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL 12
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements 12
5 MITIGATION 15
5.1 Project Goals and Objectives 15
6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN 17
6.1 Reference Stream 17
6.2 Design Parameters 18
6.3 Sediment Control Measures 23
6.4 Vegetation and Planting Plan 23
6.5 Mitigation Summary 26
6.6 Determination of Credits 26
7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 28
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria 28
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria 28
8 MONITORING PLAN 29
8.1 As-Built Survey 29
8.2 Visual Monitoring 29
8.3 Hydrology Events 29
8.4 Cross Sections 29
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring 30
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting 30
9 INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN 32
10 MAINTENANCE PLAN 33
11 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 34
12 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE 35
12.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits 35
12.2 Subsequent Credit Releases 35
13 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN 37
14 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES 38
15 REFERENCES 39
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan ii December 2020

List of Tables
Table 1.Feed and Seed Project Components Summary 1
Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information 2
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information 4
Table 4. Jurisdiction Wetland Information 6
Table 5.Mapped Soil Series 7
Table 6. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics 8
Table 7. Regulatory Considerations 9
Table 8. Endangered Species List 10
Table 9.Functional Benefits and Improvements 16
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison 21
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses 22
Table 12. Comparison of Permissible and Proposed Velocities 23
Table 13. Proposed Plant List 25
Table 14.Mitigation Credits 27
Table 15.Monitoring Requirements 31
Table 16.Maintenance Plan 33
Table 17. Stream Credit Release Schedule 36
Table 18.Financial Assurances 38
List of Figures
Figure 1 —Project Vicinity
Figure 2—Landowner Parcels
Figure 3—USGS Quadrangle
Figure 4—Land use
Figure 5—Existing Conditions
Figure 6—National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7—Mapped Soils
Figure 8—Historical Conditions
Figure 9—Conceptual Plan
Figure 10—National Flood Hazard
Figure 11 —Monitoring Plan
Appendices
Appendix A- Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan(Plan)
Appendix B - Initial Evaluation Letter and Regulatory Scoping Correspondence
Appendix C- Site Protection Instrument and Longterm Steward Information
Appendix D- Wetland JD Forms and Maps
Appendix E- DWR Stream Determination and Buffer Viability
Appendix F- USACE District Assessment Forms-NCWAM
Appendix G- Data,Analysis,and Supplementary Information
Appendix H- Plan Set
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan iii December 2020

1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Components
The Feed and Seed Mitigation Project (Project) (SAW-2018-01637) is located within Randolph
County, approximately 5.6 miles southeast of the City of Archdale. The Project lies within the Cape
Fear River Basin 8-digit Cataloguing Unit (CU) 03030003, North Carolina Department of Water
Resources (NCDWR) sub-basin 03-06-08 and United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit
hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03030003010070(Figure 1). The Project is being designed to help meet
compensatory mitigation requirements for stream impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin CU 03030003.
The Project is also being designed in concurrence with the RES Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation
Bank.The Project proposes to restore 2,333 linear feet(LF),enhance 753 LF,and provide water quality
benefit downstream of the 343-acre project drainage area. The project will also restore and enhance
riparian buffer area within the project area, which will provide 616,843.941 buffer credits for the
Randleman Lake Service Area. The Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan (the Plan) is found in Appendix
A. As the site will be generating buffer credits, we will not be using nonstandard buffer widths to
calculate credits for the project.
The Project will be protected by a conservation easement totaling 27.58 acres, is comprised of six
unnamed tributaries that drain into Randleman Lake totaling an existing 3,199 LF of stream. Two of
the tributaries, that are separated from the main easement segment will only be utilized to generate
buffer credit and are not part of the stream mitigation. The stream mitigation components are
summarized in Table 1. The Project is accessible from Lewis Davis Road(Figure 1). Coordinates for
the Project are as follows: 35.883069 N and-79.856111 W.
1.2 Project Outcomes
The streams proposed for restoration and enhancement have been significantly impacted by livestock
production, agricultural impoundment, and a riparian buffer lacking in understory. Proposed
improvements to the Project will help meet the river basin needs expressed in the 2009 Cape Fear River
Basin Restoration Priorities(RBRP)as well as provide ecological improvements to the riparian corridor
within the easement.
Through stream restoration and enhancement, the Project presents 3,362 LF of proposed stream,
generating 2,489.200 base Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) (Table 1). This mitigation plan
includes several updates from the prospectus;the two buffer only easement segments have been added
to the stream mitigation plan in response to the email from the IRT on September 11th, 2019 on the
Coordinated Review of 404/401 Mitigation Plans and Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset Plans.
Additionally,treatments have been updated based on design needs; the pond above RD2 will now be
included in the restoration, and the origin of RD2 is proposed to be in the pond footprint while the
former origin of RD2 is renamed as the origin of RD3.Finally,the crossing has been removed from the
main easement section, and the easement has been updated. The initial evaluation letter can be found
in Appendix B.
Table 1.Feed and Seed Project Components Summary
Stream Mitigation
Mitigation Approach, Linear Feet Ratio Base Warm SMU
Restoration 2,333 1:1 2,333.000
Enhancement II 753 2.5:1 301.200
No Stream Credits 276 - -
Total 3,362 - 2,489.200
Total SMUs 2,489.200
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 1 December 2020

2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The purpose of the proposed Bank is to generate compensatory mitigation credits for inclusion in the
Feed and Seed Stream Mitigation Bank in the Cape Fear River Basin.The 2009 Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) identified restoration priorities specific to the catalog units (CUs). For
the 03030003 CU there are two specific watershed goals watershed:
• Protection of a number of mussel species recognized by the Wildlife Resource Commission as
priority for protection and the federally endangered and US Fish and Wildlife priority
protection species, the Cape Fear Shiner.
• Improvement in water quality to waters draining to Randleman Reservoir
The Project is designed to help meet the second goal,to improve water quality of waters draining to the
Randleman Lake. The Project will additionally meet the goal laid out in the Randleman Lake Riparian
Buffer Rules to protect and preserve existing riparian buffers to protect water supply uses of the
Randleman Lake and designated water supplies in the Randleman Lake Watershed. The project will
address several stressors impacting the watershed through nutrient removal, sediment removal, and
improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat. These goals will be supported through stream restoration and
enhancement and riparian buffer improvement and protection.
2.1 Site Selection
The Project was identified as a stream and buffer mitigation opportunity to improve water quality,
habitat, and hydrology within the Cape Fear River Basin. The Project will directly and indirectly
improve water quality in the waters draining to the Randleman Lake by stabilizing eroding stream
banks, reconnecting incised streams to their floodplains, reducing sediment and nutrient loads, and
enhancing and restoring forested buffers along the stream channels. Project-specific goals and
objectives will be addressed further in Section 5.
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this Project includes three
parcels in Randolph County with the following ownership in Table 2 & Figure 2. Once finalized, a
copy of the land protection instrument will be included in Appendix C. The Wilmington District
Conservation Easement model template will be utilized to draft the site protection instrument.
Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information
rofRecord
lirrill Stream Reach
BO
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 2 December 2020

Ryan S.Davis,Sr.,Julie Ann D.
Davis,and Ryan S.Davis,Jr.and 7747789806 RD5,RD6
Toni O.Davis
7747565971 RD2,RD3,RD4
Ryan S.Davis and Toni O.Davis 7747665722
RD1,RD2,RD4
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 3 December 2020

3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Summary Information
Drainage Area and Land Use
The total drainage area for the Project is 343 acres (0.54 mi2) (Table 3); the drainage area of Reach
RD1 is 161 acres(0.25 mi2);Reach RD2 is 73 acres(0.11 mi2);Reach RD3 is 7 acres(0.01 mi2);Reach
RD4 is 15 acres (0.02 mi2); Reach RD5 is 4 acres (0.02 mi2) and Reach RD6 is 178 acres (0.28 mi2)
(Figure 3). The four reaches (RD1, RD2, RD3, and RD4) proposed for stream mitigation credit are
found within a continuous easement section with a total drainage area of 256 acres. Whereas, two of
the reaches,RD5 and RD6,are separated from the main easement segment and will only be utilized for
riparian buffer credit(Appendix A).
Land use within the drainage area consists of approximately 28%Pasture,27%Forest,27%Cropland,
15%Residential,2%Impervious Surface,0.4%Brush,and 0.3%Water(Figure 4).Historic and current
land-use within the immediate Project area have allowed livestock direct access to the streams. These
activities have negatively impacted both water quality and streambank stability in Project streams.
Natural drainage patterns throughout the project watershed have been altered by agricultural
production, impoundments, and manipulation of the stream channels. Similarly, the proposed
mitigation area project streams have been historically channelized by livestock production and one
headwater stream being impounded for agricultural purposes as shown on the existing conditions map
(Figure 5).
Although these tributaries are not classified, they drain to the Randleman Lake, which has been
assigned as Water Supply IV (WS-IV) and CA:* (NCDEQ 2017). Water Supply IV (WS-IV) waters
are used as sources of water supply for drinking,culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS-I,
II or III classification is not feasible. These waters are also protected for Class C uses. WS-IV waters
are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Areas (NCDWQ 2011).
Randleman Lake has also been designated as a Critical Area within a designated Critical Supply
Watershed that is subject to a special management strategy specified in 15A NCAC 2B .0248.
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information
Watershed Feature Designation
Level IV Ecoregion 45b—Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030003
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030003010070
DWR Sub-basin 03-06-08
Project Drainage Area(acres) 343
Percent Impervious Area 2%
Surface Water Classification(drains to) WS-IV;CA:*
3.2 Landscape Characteristics
The Project is located in the Southern Outer Piedmont level IV ecoregion within the Piedmont level III
ecoregion.With lower elevations and less relief compared to other areas of the Piedmont,the landforms
of this ecoregion consist of irregular, rolling plains. The geologic composition of the region is red,
clayey subsoils underlain by deep saprolite and gneiss, schist, and granite bedrock. Interspersed
throughout the region are also areas of diabase, diorite, or gabbro bedrock that form alkaline soils.
Natural vegetation communities consist of mixed oak forests, while historic land use trends have
promoted the establishment of loblolly and shortleaf pine forests(USEPA). Elevations range from 750
to 800 feet above mean sea level(NAD 27)based upon USGS topographic mapping(Figure 3).
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 4 December 2020

Vegetation
The vegetation of the project area is a combination of maintained pasture and grazed forested areas.
Forested riparian areas have been intermittently livestock-grazed and lack a well-developed understory
and shrub strata which is dominated by invasive Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). The
riparian areas most closely resemble a disturbed piedmont alluvial forest and included tulip-poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera),white oak(Quercus alba),American holly(Rex opaca),American Sycamore
(Plananus occidentalis), elm (Ulmus alata), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), sugar hackberry
(Celtis laeviata), river birch (Betula nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), and American hornbeam
(Carpinus caroliniana). Sub-canopy species included sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), blackberry
(Rubus argutus), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corybosum), black elderberry (Sambucus
canadensis), and roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia). The pasture areas were dominated by
pasture grasses with the presence of other herbaceous species like fescue grass(Festuca sp.),common
milkweed(Asclepiads syriaca),dogfennel(Eupatorium capifollium),asters(Symphyotrichum sp.),and
American pokeweed(Phytolacca Americana). Invasive species are also present throughout,including
Japanese stiltgrass,multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora)and Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense).
Existing Wetlands
A detailed wetland delineation was performed August 12th,2019.Wetland boundaries were delineated
using current methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Soils were characterized and classified using
the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0 (NRCS, 2010). A preliminary
jurisdictional determination (PJD) request was sent to the USACE on August 29, 2019. Per USACE
correspondence found in Appendix D,the USACE concurs with the JD submittal and an approval will
be completed in conjunction with the bank approval.Wetland forms are included in Appendix D. The
stream channels were classified using NC DWR methodology (Figure 5) and were verified by
NCDWR onsite June 13,2018 (Appendix E).
Eight jurisdictional wetlands are present within the boundaries of the proposed Project,(Appendix D,
Figure 5, Table 4). Wetlands are labeled as WA (Wetland A) through WH (Wetland H) and are
described below in Table 4.All wetlands within the Project vicinity were rated using the North Carolina
Wetland Assessment Method(NCWAM)(Appendix F).
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 5 December 2020

Table 4.Jurisdiction Wetland Information
'Wetland NCWAM Wetland Type Area Vegetation
ID Rating (ac)
WA Medium Headwater 0.87 Tree Stratum:
Forest Red maple,American sycamore, and sweetgum
Shrub Stratum:
WB High Headwater 0.13 Chinese privet
Forest
Herb Stratum:
Soft rush(Juncus effusus),Pennsylvania smartweed
(Persicaria pensylvanica), square-stem spikerush
(Eleocharis quadrangulata), sallow sedge(Carex lurida),
and marsh dayflower(Murdannia keisak)
WC High Headwater 0.07 Tree Stratum:
Forest Red maple and American sycamore
Shrub Stratum:
Chinese privet
WD High Headwater 0.04
Forest Herb Stratum:
Soft rush,Pennsylvania smartweed, and Japanese stiltgrass
WE High Headwater 0.05
Forest Woody Vine Stratum:
Common greenbrier
WF Low Non-Tidal 0.43 Herb Stratum:
Freshwater Soft rush,Pennsylvania smartweed, square-stem spikerush,
Marsh sallow sedge, and marsh dayflower
WG High Headwater 0.04 Tree Stratum:
Forest Red maple and tulip poplar
Shrub Stratum:
Privet and American holly
Herb Stratum:
Soft rush and Japanese stiltgrass
WH Low Headwater 0.01 Tree Stratum:
Forest Absent
Herb Stratum:
Soft rush and tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea)
The USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) depicts two wetlands within the project limits.
In the southeast corner of the project area there is a small area of PSS1Ah (Palustrine, Scrub-Shrub,
Broad-Leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded) that is found within the pond footprint and a linear
wetland mapped as PFO1A(Freshwater Forested/Shrub wetland)along RD6(Figure 6).
Soil Survey
The Randolph County Soil Survey (NRCS, 2006) and NRCS Web Soil Survey depicts two mapping
units across the project site(Figure 7). The map units are Mecklenburg clay loam,two to eight percent
slopes,moderately eroded and Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex,eight to 15 percent slopes.The soil
characteristics of these map units are summarized in Table 5.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 6 December 2020

Table 5. Mapped Soil Series
Map r Percent Hydrologic Landscape
Svm p Unit Name Hydric Drainage Class Soil Group Setting
Mecklenburg clay
MeB2 loam,2 to 8 percent 0% Well Drained C Summits
slopes,moderately
eroded
Wilkes-Poindexter-
WpC Wynott complex,8 0% Well Drained C/D Backslopes on
to 15 percent slopes ridges
3.3 Land Use -Historic, Current, and Future
Historic aerial imagery indicates that the southern portion of the Project and adjacent land has been
used extensively for agricultural purposes since at least 1948. The northern two easement segments of
the project remained mostly wooded,with the exception of a small pasture area between RD5 and RD6
and were not as impacted by agricultural use until the mid-1990's (Figure 8). Currently,the northern
portion of the project is being used for pastureland. Much of the areas adjacent to the project streams
have been allowed to maintain a thin canopy but have limited understory and are densely vegetated
with stiltgrass. The southern portion of the easement is forested and pastureland and has remained this
way since before the 1940's. The farm pond at the southernmost end of the project was likely
constructed sometime after 1948.The future land use for the Project will include an established 27.58-
acre conservation easement,that will be protected in perpetuity. Outside the Project will likely remain
in agricultural use.
3.4 Reach Summary Information
The Project area is comprised of three easement sections just north of Randleman Lake. As mentioned
before, the two smaller northern easement sections are proposed solely for riparian buffer credit. The
main easement section where stream work will be conducted is a continuous easement with no
crossings. The stream channels within this continuous section include four unnamed tributaries, split
into six reaches based on treatment need (Figure 9). Results of the preliminary data collection are
presented in Table 6.
In general, all or portions RD1, RD2, RD3, and RD4 do not function to their full potential. Current
conditions demonstrate significant degradation due to continued livestock access and other associated
agricultural impacts including areas of either disturbed riparian buffer or no riparian buffer and an
agricultural impoundment. Restoration reaches are incised, and enhancement reaches are in need of
channel stabilization(Figure 9).A summary of the morphological parameters is located in Appendix
G.Channel characteristics are summarized in Table 6.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 7 December 2020

Table 6. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics
Mrainage W BKF W/D Bank Entrenchment Sinuosity Slope
Area (ft) Mean Rati Height Ratio (ft/ft)
(acres) Depth(ft) Ratio
RD1-A 84 4.2 4.4 1.1 4.5 1.6 5.6 1.14 0.008
RIM-B 161 6.1 7.8 0.8 9.9 1.0 >2.2 1.17 0.005
RD2(US) 27 1.8 3.2 0.6 5.6 4.3 1.6 1.25 0.020
RD2(MS) 54 4.1 5.6 0.7 7.7 2.7 1.6 1.04 0.012
RD2 (DS) 73 5.7 6.2 0.9 6.7 3.3 1.4 1.11 0.008
RD3 7 0.8 2.7 0.3 9.4 3.3 1.8 1.17 0.031
RD4-A 15 1.3 2.2 0.6 3.8 1.0 6.4 1.02 0.040
RD4-B 15 1.8 2.8 0.6 4.4 4.1 1.3 1.16 0.028
Channel Classification
The streams have been classified as intermittent streams using the NCDWR Stream Identification Form
version 4.11 (Figure 5). Stream determinations have been verified by the NCDWR in the field
(Appendix E) and the USACE. The stream channels were also assessed using the NC Stream
Assessment Method(NCSAM)(Appendix G).
Existing Channel Morphology
RIM
RD1-A
Reach RD1-A is an intermittent, unnamed tributary to Randleman Lake that is the primary drainage
feature onsite and has a drainage area of 0.13 mi2 (84 ac). It flows through pasture from the western
property boundary. RD1-A is approximately 183 linear feet. The upstream portion of this channel is
incised, with significant bank degradation from hoof shear. There are several concrete slabs in the
channel near the upper end of the reach,and one culverted crossing just downstream of those.
RDI-B
Reach RD1-B is an intermittent,unnamed tributary to Randleman Lake and has a drainage area of 0.25
mi2(161 ac). It flows approximately 588 linear feet through pasture from RD1-A to the eastern side of
the project before entering a culvert under Lewis Davis Road. The reach is mostly stable and
appropriately sized; however, it does exhibit portions of vertical banks, erosion, and widening from
livestock. The riparian buffer is maintained pasture on the left bank and sparsely forested pasture on
the right bank to its confluence with RD2,after which there are almost no trees on either bank.
RD2
Reach RD2 is an intermittent tributary with a drainage area of 0.11 mi2(73 ac)which originates at the
southern corner of the project below an agricultural impoundment and flows northeast past RD3 and
RD4 to confluence with RD1. The reach is approximately 1,756 linear feet and exhibits extensive
channelization, entrenchment, portions of vertical banks, and erosion from livestock. The stream
channel is within an active forested pasture bound by non-forested pasture on either side. There is one
12 ft culvert crossing near the upper end of this reach, and 22 acres of the reach's drainage area is
controlled by the agricultural impoundment at the start of the reach.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 8 December 2020

RD3
Reac-h RD3 is an intermittent tributary that originates at the southeastern end of the project and flows
approximately 175 linear feet northeast to confluence with RD2. RD3 has a drainage area of 0.01 mi2
(7 ac)and flows through active wooded pasture bound by non-forested pasture on either side.The upper
portion of RD3 is over-wide and lacks bank definition from consistent livestock trampling. There is a
headcut approximately halfway down the reach, below which the channel incises and is dramatically
oversized with portions of unstable,vertical banks.
RD4
RD4--A
Reach RD4-A is an intermittent tributary that originates along the eastern side of the project,
downstream of a headwater wetland,and flows north to just upstream of a headcut in the channel. The
reach has a drainage area of 0.02 mi2 (15 ac) and is approximately 61 linear feet. The channel flows
through open pasture and has been widened by livestock but is still fairly stable.
RD4-B
Reach RD4-B is an intermittent tributary that originates from RD1-A and flows north to confluence
with RD2. The reach has a drainage area of 0.02 mi2(15 ac)and is approximately 160 linear feet.This
portion of the reach flows from the open pasture through forested pasture. At the tree line there is a
headcut in the channel,below which the reach incises dramatically and exhibits extensive portions of
unstable,vertical banks as it flows to its confluence with RD2.
3.5 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints
Table 7 is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Project. Supporting documentation can be
found in Appendix B and Appendix D.
Table 7.Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable Resolved Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States-Section 404 Yes No Appendix D*
Waters of the United States-Section 401 Yes No Appendix D*
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix B
National Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix B
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA) No N/A N/A
/Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No No N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Act-Essential Fisheries No N/A N/A
Habitat
*PCN for the Nationwide Permit General Permit 27 will be submitted after the Final Mitigation Plan is approved
Property, Boundary, and Utilities
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by livestock fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-
blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundaries will
be marked with signs identifying the property as a mitigation site and will include the name of the long-
term steward and a contact number. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be
repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as
part of monitoring activities and the conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported
in the annual monitoring reports to USACE and DWR.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 9 December 2020

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Hydrologic Trespass
The Project is not within a mapped FEMA Regulatory Floodway or 100-year floodplain (Figure 10).
While designing the Feed and Seed project, appropriate measures were taken to eliminate hydrologic
trespass of the adjacent agricultural fields. The adjacent land use will not be affected by the proposed
design,and no detrimental impacts are expected beyond the easement limits.
Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under
provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The US Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) database (updated 26 March 2018) lists the Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii)as an endangered species in Randolph County,North Carolina(Table 8).The
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(BGPA) and prohibits take of bald and golden eagles. No protected species or potential habitat for
protected species was observed during preliminary site evaluations. Species and species habitat listed
in the USFWS database were inspected during the field investigation to determine whether they occur
at the Project.No individual species or habitats were identified on site.Potential impacts to species and
species habitat off site, downstream, and within the vicinity of the project were also considered. A
survey was complete,on August 20,2019 for the Schweinitz's sunflower and found that there were no
species or habitat present within the project area.
In addition to the USFWS database, the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) GIS database was
consulted to determine whether previously cataloged occurrences of protected species are mapped
within one mile of the project.Results from NHP indicated that there are no known occurrences within
a one-mile radius of the project area. A letter from the USFWS dated March 29, 2019 indicated that
minimal adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources are expected as part of the project.
Documentation is included in Appendix B.
Table 8.Endangered Species List
mon Name ntific nameederal Habitat Record
Status Present Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA No Current
Vascular Plant:
Schweinitz's sunflower I Helianthus schweinitzii E I No I Current
E=Endangered;BGPA=Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Cultural Resources
Environmental and cultural resources include historic and archeological resources located in or near
the project parcel. RES has evaluated the Parcel's existing and future conditions of cultural resources
to determine potential project impacts. A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) website was reviewed to determine if any listed or potentially eligible historic or
archeological resources in the proposed Feed and Seed Site existed. This search did not reveal any
occurrence within the project area. The Blair-Anthony House (RD0162) and the William Coletrane
House (RD0029) are located within 0.5 mile of the project area. The Feed and Seed Project will not
threaten or impact these historic locations.A letter from SHPO dated April 4,2019 stated that no known
historic resources would be affected by the project. Documentation is included in Appendix B.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 10 December 2020

Clean Water Act-Section 401/404
Impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands and protected buffer will be unavoidable due to the
restoration and enhancement actives proposed. Although these impacts are unavoidable,the proposed
stream treatment will result in an overall functional uplift of the stream and wetland system, as
described in Section 4. Two reaches, RD1-B and RD4-A, will have temporary impacts due to
enhancement activities such as instream habitat structures and bank grading,as a part of Enhancement
II.Furthermore,restoration reaches,RD1-A,RD2,RD3,and RD4-B will have permanent impacts,due
to stream restoration and stream realignment. Six wetlands (WA, WB, WD, WE, WF, WG) will be
impacted due to stream restoration and pond removal activities. Wetlands WA and WB will have both
permanent and temporary impacts due to the restoration and enhancement of RD1.Wetlands WD,WE,
WF, and WG will have both temporary and permanent impacts due to the restoration of RD2 and the
draining of the agricultural impoundment. This may impact the fringe wetlands around this pond
footprint,but they are expected to re-establish closer to the stream origin. There will also be impact to
the protected riparian buffer through stream restoration efforts. However,the impacts to the buffer will
be limited where possible through design and the project will greatly increase the riparian area of these
stream corridors along with protecting the riparian area into perpetuity through a conservation
easement. Moreover, all stream and wetland impacts will be accounted for in the Pre-Construction
Notification form.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 11 December 2020

4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
In order to broaden the reach-scale goals of this restoration project, a functional based discussion is
used to contextualize the functional uplift of this individual project to the watershed scale. The Stream
Functions Pyramid Framework (Harman et. al. 2012) separates stream functions into five categories,
ordered into a hierarchy, which communicate the interrelations among functions and illustrate the
dependence of higher-level functions (biology, physicochemical and geomorphology) on lower level
functions (hydrology and hydraulics). Functions that affect the greatest number of other functions are
illustrated at the base of the Pyramid, while functions that have the least effect on other functions are
illustrated at the top.Fischenich(2006)found that the most critical functions include those that address
hydrodynamic processes,sediment transport processes, stream stability and riparian buffer restoration.
By addressing these fundamental functions and processes, a restored stream and riparian system are
capable of supporting more dependent functions that typically require time to establish,such as diverse
biological communities,chemical and nutrient processes,diverse habitats and improved water and soil
quality.The objectives of the Project will address the most critical functional objectives that will allow
for a more restored stream and riparian buffer over time.
Therefore,principles of the Framework are utilized to discuss and communicate the potential functional
uplift to streams at the Feed and Seed project and to propose realistic, attainable goals and objectives.
However,the determination of credits and performance standards for the Project follow guidance put
forth by the USACE Wilmington District.
The Feed and Seed Mitigation Project will provide numerous ecological and water quality benefits
within the Cape Fear River Basin by applying an ecosystem restoration approach. The restoration
approach at the reach scale of this project will have the greatest effect on the hydraulic and geomorphic
function of the system but will benefit the upper-level functions (physicochemical and biology) over
time,and in combination with other projects within the watershed. The anticipated functional benefits
and improvements within the Project area,as based on the Function-Based Framework are outlined in
Table 9.
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements
Hydrology
The hydrology for the Project reaches is functioning, as there are no limiting factors of water
transportation from the watershed to the channel. This project intends to make local improvements to
the already functioning hydrology.Much of the improvement will come from altering land use within
the project area by converting over 27 acres of pasture to riparian forest.The Project will locally address
several historic hydrologic disturbances including livestock access to stream channels, hydrologic
impoundments and channelization;however,it is not anticipated that the Project will have a significant
effect on hydrology at the watershed scale.
Hydraulic
The greatest potential uplift at the Project will be achieved through increasing floodplain connectivity
throughout the Project.Reaches in the Project do not have functioning floodplain connectivity or stable
flow dynamics. Reaches where floodplain connectivity is not fully functional will be improved by
reducing bank height ratios and increasing entrenchment ratios.Reaches in which stable flow dynamics
are not fully functional will be improved by constructing a new stable channel with adequate energy
dissipation and grade control. Additionally, instream structures will be installed to address the energy
and erosive power of the water so that a stable base flow is achieved post-project. Currently hydraulic
parameters for portions or all of reaches RD1, RD2, RD3, and RD4 are not functioning and will be
returned to functioning by restoration activities. Whereas,the hydraulic parameters for portions or all
of reaches RD1,RD4,RD5,and RD6 are currently functioning.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 12 December 2020

Geomorphology
Sediment Transport will be improved in reaches that currently not functioning properly by designing
channels that transport sediment until it reaches an appropriate place to settle, like a point bar, and
reducing the excess sediment load entering the stream.This reduction will be achieved by establishing
a functional buffer,restricting livestock access to the stream channels, and constructing channels that
maintain stable dimension, plan, and profile. Large Woody Debris Transport and Storage will be
improved by the use of woody debris such as log vanes,brush toes,and log sills for in-stream structures
on restoration and enhancement reaches. The restoration reaches are also designed to accumulate
woody debris by having defined shallow riffles where gravel catches and holds woody debris and leaf
packs.Riparian vegetation is functioning in some areas but is not functioning properly along all reaches.
Therefore,riparian buffers will be planted out to a minimum of 100 feet(in most of the project out to
200 feet)to improve the riparian vegetation to functioning levels.Bed form diversity will be improved
in restoration areas by using a natural riffle-pool sequence from the reference reach to inform design of
functioning riffle-pool sequences in constructed channels based on reference reach conditions.This bed
form diversity will also further improve aquatic habitat. All these functional parameters are
interconnected and ultimately depend on each other to function properly. Therefore, by focusing
improvements to these parameters,the restored channels will achieve dynamic equilibrium and provide
maximum geomorphic functional uplift. Currently, geomorphologic parameters for parts of reaches
RD1, RD2, RD3 and RD4 are not functioning, due to the lack of bedform diversity and livestock
impacts;post-restoration these reaches will be functioning.
Physicochemical
Although this project would promote nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas,it is difficult
to measure nutrient and sediment reduction at this project level because they can be affected by so many
variables. However, several restoration actions are known to help reduce nutrients and sediment even
though they may not be measurable at the project level. These activities include filtering of runoff
through buffer areas, the conversion of active livestock fields to forested buffers, and improved
denitrification and nutrient uptake through buffer zones. Additional benefits may also come from
functional uplift of the lower level stream functions(hydraulics and geomorphology),which will reduce
sediment and nutrients in the system through bank stabilization and floodplain reconnection.
Temperature regulation will also be improved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the
stream buffer areas. Oxygen regulation will occur through two actions: first, the temperature of the
water directly impacts the amount of gas held by the water. Therefore, through planting the buffer to
shade the channel the temperature is decreased dissolved oxygen is increased. Secondly,the riffle-pool
sequence and log structures placed in the stream create mixing zones where oxygen dissolves much
faster than the standard exchange rate of oxygen to dissolved oxygen.The processing of organic matter
will be improved once healthy riffles are shallow enough to catch twigs and branches that then retain
leaves.Many of these physicochemical benefits occur slowly over time and are dependent on multiple
variables within the stream ecosystem.Therefore,it is not practical or feasible to directly measure these
parameters within the monitoring timeframe of this project. With that said, it is logical to use existing
riparian buffer and visual performance standards to demonstrate the positive correlation between
geomorphic parameters and physicochemical parameters. For example, as riparian buffer trees grow,
as represented in annual monitoring reports, it is anticipated that canopy cover is actively shading the
stream channel and reducing water temperature.
Biology
As mentioned for the physicochemical stream function, it will be difficult to measure the functional
uplift of the biological functions at this site within the monitoring period of the project.However,since
the life histories of many species likely to benefit from stream and wetland restoration are depending
on all the lower-level functions (Hydrology, Hydraulics, Geomorphology, and Physicochemical),
benefit to biology over time and in combination with other projects within the watershed is anticipated.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 13 December 2020

Again, there is no substitute for direct biological monitoring, but it is important to understand the
hierarchy of the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework in order to help project long-term benefits of
the Project, though only categories two and three (hydraulics and geomorphology) will be directly
measured during the seven-year monitoring period.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 14 December 2020

5 MITIGATION
5.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The purpose of the proposed Bank is to generate compensatory mitigation credits for inclusion in the
Feed and Seed Stream Mitigation Bank in the Cape Fear River Basin. Through the comprehensive
analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework,
specific,attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project. These goals clearly address the
2009 Cape Fear RBRP to improve water quality to waters draining to the Randleman Lake (listed in
Section 2).
The project goals address stressors identified in the watershed,and include the following:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner in a stable
channel;
• Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses by
reducing sediment and nutrient loads;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks flows and
connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation;and
• Improve ecological processes by reducing water temperature,improving terrestrial and aquatic
habitat,and restoring a native plant community.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Design and reconstruct stream channels sized to convey bankfull flows that will maintain a
stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed conditions, and
reference reach conditions;
• Permanently exclude livestock from stream channels and their associated buffers through
livestock fencing;
• Add in-stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Install habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increase forested riparian buffers to at least 100 feet and up to 200 feet along both sides of the
channel along the project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Implement one Engineered Sediment Pack structure to limit inputs from surrounding farming
operations,
• Treat exotic invasive species;and
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project.
Anticipated functional uplift,benefits,and improvements within the Project area,as based on the
Function Based Framework are outlined in Table 9.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 15 December 2020

Table 9.Functional Benefits and Improvements
Level Function Objective Measurement Method
Hydrology to transport water from Convert land-use of streams Percent Project drainage
Transport of water the watershed to the and their headwaters from area converted to riparian
1 from the watershed to channel in a non- livestock pasture to riparian forest
the channel erosive manner forest (indirect measurement)
Cross sections
Hydraulic Improve flood bank
Transport of water in to transport water in a connectivity by reducing Stage Recorders
2 the channel,on the stable non-erosive
floodplain,and manner bank height ratios and Bank Height Ratio
through the sediments increase entrenchment ratios
Entrenchment Ratio
Reduce erosion rates and
channel stability to reference
reach conditions As-built stream profile
Geomorphology to create a diverse
Transport of wood and Improve bedfonn diversity Cross sections
3 sediment to create bedfonn (pool spacing,percent riffles,
diverse bedforms and to achieve dynamic etc.) Visual monitoring
dynamic equilibrium equilibrium
Increase buffer width to Vegetation plots
nearly 200 feet and protect
existing buffer
to achieve appropriate Vegetation plots
Physicochemical° levels for water Unmeasurable (indirect measurement)
temperature,dissolved
Temperature and oxygen concentration, Objective/Expected Benefit Established conservation
4 oxygen regulation; and other important Establish native hardwood easement protected in
processing of organic nutrients including but riparian buffer and exclude perpetuity,installation of
matter and nutrients not limited to Nitrogen livestock. fencing
and Phosphorus (indirect measurement)
Unmeasurable
Biology° to achieve functionali Objective/Expected Benefit As-Built Survey(in-direct
Biodiversity and life in levels 1-4 to support Improve aquatic habitat measurement)
5 histories of aquatic the life histories of through the installation of
life histories and aquatic and riparian habitat features,construction
riparian life plants and animals of pools at varying depths,
and planting the riparian
buffer
°These categories are measured indirectly
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 16 December 2020

6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
6.1 Reference Stream
The restoration portions of the Project are currently characterized by agricultural and livestock
practices. Physical parameters of the Project were used, as well as other reference materials, to
determine the target stream type. The "Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina"
was also used to narrow the potential community types that would have existed at the Project(Schafale,
2012).From that point,an iterative process was used to finalize the details of the Project design.
Targeted reference conditions included the following:
• Located within the physiographic region and ecoregion,
• Similar land use on site and in the watershed,
• Similar soil types on site and in the watershed,
• Ideal,undisturbed habitat—several types of woody debris present,
• Similar topography,
• Similar slope,
• Pattern common among Piedmont streams,and
• Minimal presence of invasive species.
Reference Watershed Characterization
The selected reference stream is an Unnamed Tributary (UT)to Muddy Creek just downstream of the
Rhapsody Project in Randolph County,NC.The reach that was surveyed and analyzed is approximately
200 feet long. The drainage area for this segment of UT to Muddy Creek is 0.35 square miles (224
acres). The land use in the watershed is characterized as mostly forested(59%) and agriculture (33%)
with minor components of residential(3%), open space (2%),impervious(1%), and open water(1%).
Site photographs of the reference stream are located in Appendix G.
The current State classification for Muddy Creek downstream of the reference reach is WS-IV and CA*
(NCDWQ 2012a). WS-IV waters are used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food
processing purposes where a WS-I,II or III classification is not feasible.These waters are also protected
for Class C uses. WS-IV waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or
Protected Areas (NCDWQ 2011). It also has been designated as a Critical Area within a designated
Critical Supply Watershed that is subject to a special management strategy specified in 15A NCAC 2B
.0248. Natural drainage patterns throughout the project watershed have been altered by agricultural
production,agricultural ponds,and dredging of the channels.
Reference Discharge
Several hydrologic models/methods were used to develop a bankfull discharge along with indicators of
bankfull stage for the reference site. Existing drainage area, land use, slope, roughness, and cross-
sectional area were all factors considered when performing the calculations. Using a combination of
Piedmont Regional Curves, in-house spreadsheet tools, and two project specific regional flood
frequency analyses,the existing discharge for UT to Muddy Creek was calculated to be approximately
30 cubic feet per second (ft3/s). See Section 6.2 for a more detailed description of the hydrologic
analyses performed for this project.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 17 December 2020

Reference Channel Morphology
In comparison to the restoration reaches,reference reach UT to Muddy Creek is slightly larger than the
designed restoration reaches when comparing pattern, dimension and profile, which is the reason for
using a scaling factor for the design. The scaling factor is based on the difference in bankfull width of
the reference channel.The designed reach would then have the necessary dimensions of either a smaller
or larger stream corresponding to differences in drainage area. Reach UT to Muddy Creek, the reach
was typically 9.7 feet wide and 1.1 feet deep.The cross-sectional area was typically around 10.6 square
feet with a width to depth ratio around 8.9. Morphological parameters and cross section plots are
included in Appendix G.
6.2 Design Parameters
Stream Restoration Approach
The treatment plan and design approach were developed based on the existing conditions,project goals,
and objectives outlined in Sections 3 and 5. The Project will include Priority I and II Restoration and
Enhancement Level II. Stream restoration will incorporate the design of a single-thread, meandering
channel with parameters based on data taken from a reference site, published empirical relationships,
regional curves developed from existing project streams,and NC and VA Regional Curves.Analytical
design techniques will also be a crucial element of the project and will be used to determine the design
discharge and to verify the overall design. The Conceptual plan is provided in Figure 9.
The detailed treatment plan and design approach is as follows:
Reach RD1-A
An inline restoration is proposed for this reach to address areas of bed instability, bank erosion and
incision,and buffer impacts. Restoration activities will include:
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing floodplain,
- Removal of concrete in the channel near station 0+75,
- Installing log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
- Establishing a riffle-pool sequence throughout the new channel,
- Installing brush toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD1-B
An enhancement level II approach is proposed for this reach to address areas of bank erosion and buffer
impacts. Enhancement activities will include:
- Raising the bed by installing woody riffles between station 1+73 and 3+70,
- Removal of metal beams in the channel near station 2+00,
- Controlling grade and raising the bed by installing a log sill at station 4+44,
- Stabilizing left bank near station 4+60 by installing a brush toe,
- Grading the right bank point bar near station 4+60,
- Stabilizing right bank near station 5+60 by installing a brush toe,
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 18 December 2020

Reach RD2
A mix of pond removal, inline, and offline restoration is proposed for this reach to address historic
impoundment, eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts. Restoration activities will
include:
- Draining the existing farm impoundment and removing the earthen dam,
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing pond bed,
- Raising the bed of the upstream portion of the reach and grading a new single thread channel
within the existing channel extents to tie to the existing floodplain,
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing floodplain of the mid- and downstream
portions,
- Installing log and rock structures to provide grade control and habitat,
- Establishing a riffle-pool sequence throughout the reach,
- Installing brush toe and stone toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD3-A
An enhancement level II approach is proposed for this reach to address areas of bank instability and
buffer impacts. Enhancement activities will include:
- Stabilizing the right bank by installing a brush toe near station 0+40,
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD3-B
An inline restoration approach is proposed for this reach to address eroding banks, channel
entrenchment,and buffer impacts. Restoration activities will include:
- Raising the bed of the existing reach and grading a new single thread channel within the
existing channel extents to tie to the existing floodplain,
- Installing log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
- Establishing a riffle-pool sequence throughout the reach,
- Installing brush toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD4-A
An enhancement level II approach is proposed for this reach to address areas of bank instability and
buffer impacts. Enhancement activities will include:
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Removing trash near station 0+50,
- Install an Engineered Sediment Pack just above the reach to limit inputs from the upstream
agricultural land,
- Livestock exclusion,
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 19 December 2020

- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD4-B
An offline,priority II restoration approach is proposed for this portion of the reach to address eroding
banks,channel entrenchment,and buffer impacts. Restoration activities will include:
- Grading a floodplain in the existing valley,
- Grading a new single thread channel in the new floodplain,
- Installing log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
- Establishing a riffle-pool sequence throughout the reach,
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD5
Buffer restoration is being proposed to address buffer impacts. Stream work is also proposed to address
head-cuts and eroding banks.Buffer activities will include:
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Stabilizing head-cuts via grading,matting,and live-staking,
- Stabilizing erosional features in the buffer area via grading,matting, and seeding,
- Removing trash near station 0+20,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach RD6
Buffer enhancement and restoration is being proposed to address buffer impacts.Buffer activities will
include:
- Stabilizing banks via live-staking,
- Removing trash near station 0+70,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 20 December 2020

Data Analysis
Stream Hydrologic Analysis
Hydrologic evaluations were performed for the design reaches using multiple methods to determine
and validate the design bankfull discharge and channel geometry required to provide regular floodplain
inundation. The use of various methods allows for comparison of results and eliminates reliance on a
single model. Peak flows(Table 10)and corresponding channel cross sectional areas were determined
for comparison to design parameters using the following methods:
• Regional Flood Frequency Analysis,and
• NC and VA Regional Curves for the Rural Piedmont.
Regional Flood Frequency Analysis
Two flood frequency analyses were completed for the study region using historic gauge data on all
nearby USGS gauges.The first utilized gauges with drainage areas less than 6,400 acres(10 mi2)which
passed the Dalrymple homogeneity test(Dalrymple, 1960). The second utilized gauges with drainage
areas less than 1,280 acres (2 mi2). These are both subsets of gauges used for USGS regression
equations. Regional flood frequency equations were developed for the 1.1- and 1.5-year peak
discharges based on the gauge data. Discharges were then computed for the design reach. These
discharges were compared to those predicted by the discharge regional curves.
Regional Curve Regression Equations
The North Carolina Piedmont regional curves by Harman et al. (1999) and Doll et al. (2002) and the
Virginia Rural Piedmont regional curves by Lotspeich (2009) for discharge were used to predict the
bankfull discharge for the Project. The NC regional curves predicted flows that are similar to those
predicted by the 1.5-year flood frequency, while the VA curves are much lower, approximately half
those predicted by the 1.1-year flood frequency. The regional curve equations for NC and VA:
(1) Qbk=89.04*(DA)073 (Harman et al., 1999)
(2) Qbf=91.62*(DA)071 (Doll et al.,2002)
(3) Qbk=43.895*(DA)°9472 (Lotspeich,2009)
Where Qbkf=bankfull discharge (ft3/s)and DA=drainage area(mi2).
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison
Reach Drainage Small DA Q Small DA FF NC Regions NC Regional A Regional Design Q
Area(ac) FFQ Qi.i Qi.i FFQ Qis Qi Curve Q(1) ICurve Q(2) Curve Q(3)
RD1-A 84 12 13 19 22 20 22 6 9
RD2(US) 27 5 5 8 9 9 10 2 5
RD2(MS) 54 9 9 13 16 15 16 4 9
RD2(DS) 73 11 11 17 20 18 20 6 11
RD3 7 2 2 3 4 3 4 1 3
RD4-B 15 4 4 5 6 6 6 1 4
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 21 December 2020

Sediment Transport Analysis
An erosion and sedimentation analysis was performed to confirm that the restoration design creates a
stable gravel bed channel that neither aggrades nor degrades over time. Typically, sediment transport
is assessed to determine a stream's ability to move a specific grain size at specified flows. Various
sediment transport equations are applied when estimating entrainment for sand and gravel bed streams
found in the Piedmont. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) report, Stability Thresholds for
Stream Restoration Materials (Fischenich, 2001), was used to obtain permissible shear stresses and
velocities. Data found in this document was obtained from multiple sources using different testing
conditions. The following methods and published documents were utilized during the sediment
transport analysis:
• Permissible Shear Stress Approach,and
• Permissible Velocity Approach.
Shear Stress Approach
Shear stress is a commonly used tool for assessing channel stability.Allowable channel shear stresses
are a function of bed slope, channel shape, flows, bed material (shape, size, and gradation),
cohesiveness of bank materials, vegetative cover, and incoming sediment load. The shear stress
approach compares calculated shear stresses to those found in the literature.
Critical shear stress is the shear stress required to initiate motion of the channels median particle size
(D50).
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses
..
Proposed Bed Shear Existing Critical
Allowable She}Stres
Reach Stress at Bankfull Stage Shear Stress
(lbs/ft2) I (lbs/ft2) Sand(lbs/ft2) oarse
(lb s/ft zav Vegetation
) (lbs/ft)
RD1-A 0.20 0.02 0.02 to.075 0.33 to 0.67 0.7 to 1.7
RD2(US) 0.40 0.02 0.02 to.075 0.33 to 0.67 0.7 to 1.7
RD2(MS) 0.35 0.51 0.02 to.075 0.33 to 0.67 0.7 to 1.7
RD2(DS) 0.36 0.08 0.02 to.075 0.33 to 0.67 0.7 to 1.7
RD3 0.33 0.02 0.02 to.075 0.33 to 0.67 0.7 to 1.7
RD4-B 0.27 0.02 0.02 to.075 0.33 to 0.67 0.7 to 1.7
1(Fischenich,2001)
Review of the above table shows that the proposed bed shear stresses for the Project design reaches are
above the critical shear stress of the existing channel material. Therefore, all proposed riffles will be
supplemented with a substrate mix that has a critical shear stress greater than the proposed bed shear
stress at bankfull.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 22 December 2020

Velocity Approach
Published data are readily available that provide entrainment velocities for different bed and bank
materials. A comparison of calculated velocities to these permissible velocities is a simple method to
aid in the verification of channel stability. Table 12 compares the proposed velocities calculated using
Manning's equation with the permissible velocities.
Table 12. Comparison of Permissible and Proposed Velocities
Reach Manning's"n" Design Velocity Proposed Bed Permissible Velocity2
Valuer (ft/s) Material (ft/sec)
RD1-A 0.045 1.7 Coarse gravel 2.5-6
RD2(US) 0.045 2.3 Coarse gravel 2.5-6
RD2(MS) 0.045 2.3 Coarse gravel 2.5-6
RD2(DS) 0.045 2.3 Coarse gravel 2.5-6
RD3 0.045 2.0 Coarse gravel 2.5-6
RD4-B 0.045 1.8 Coarse gravel 2.5-6
'(Chow,1959)
2(Fischenich,2001)
Sediment Supply
In addition to the stability assessment, a qualitative analysis of sediment supply was performed by
characterizing watershed conditions. A combination of field reconnaissance and windshield surveys,
existing land use data, and historical aerial photography were analyzed to assess existing and past
watershed conditions to determine if any changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment
supply.
There is significant instability and erosion along the channels, which appear to be a result of historic
livestock activity and agricultural activities occurring up to and along channel banks and not from
watershed activities.It is anticipated that sediment supply from agricultural land adjacent to the project
will decrease as buffers are enhanced and widened and channels are stabilized and realigned.
6.3 Sediment Control Measures
A suite of sediment control measures will be utilized for the Project to reduce direct effluent inputs,
pollutant contamination, and sediment loading. The combination of the following sediment control
measures: riparian buffer planting, bank stabilization, stream restoration, livestock exclusion, and
livestock watering facilities,will ultimately lead to the functional uplift of the site,while still allowing
livestock production to persist through the installation of alternative water sources. Additionally, the
installation of five Engineered Sediment Packs will regulate upstream runoff coming into RD2, RD3,
and RD4. The Engineered Sediment Packs will attenuate peak sediment loading by reducing velocities
and filtering runoff from the upstream agricultural land.
The riparian buffer will be restored along all project reaches. Restored riparian buffers are established
adjacent to and up-gradient from watercourses of water bodies to improve water quality. Buffers will
be protected from livestock by installing fencing along all project boundaries.
6.4 Vegetation and Planting Plan
Plant Community Restoration
The restoration of the plant communities is an important aspect of the restoration Project. The selection
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 23 December 2020

of plant species is based on what was observed at the reference reach, species present in the forest
surrounding the restoration Project, and what is typically native to the area. Several sources of
information were used to determine the most appropriate species for the restoration project. The
reference stream is located within a disturbed Piedmont Alluvial Forest. Dominant species included
sweetgum,red maple, tulip poplar,American beech,pignut hickory, eastern red cedar, green ash, and
boxelder.The reference site was chosen due to the stability of the channel,the physical structure of the
forest community,and to evaluate stream habitat.
There will be two planting communities within the project to ensure species are distributed within areas
that are amenable to them. The primary riparian planting community (Zone 1; 18.13 ac) will be a
Piedmont Alluvial Forest along the majority of the Project reaches and upland areas. A secondary
planting community(Zone 2; 2.49 ac)will be a Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest within the largest
wetlands on-site,as well as within the pond footprint to focus more hydrophilic species in those areas.
The target communities,and their respective planting areas,are shown in Appendix H and Figure 11.
The plant species list has been developed and can be found in Table 13. Species with high dispersal
rates are not included because of locally occurring, adjacent seed sources and the high potential for
natural regeneration.The high dispersal species include red maple and sweetgum.In disturbed settings,
these species tend to dominate, so while these species could be counted towards success, they should
be monitored to ensure they do not outcompete the other proposed species.
The restoration of plant communities along the Project will provide stabilization and diversity. For
rapid stabilization of the stream banks(primarily outside meanders),silky dogwood(Cornus amomum),
eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) and black willow (Salix nigra) were chosen for live stakes
along the restored channels. Willows grow at a faster rate than the species planted around them,
providing faster bank stabilization and contribution of organic matter to the channel than the other
planted woody species.As the community matures,the willows will slowly stop growing or die out as
the other species outgrow them and create shade that the willows do not tolerate.The live stake species
will be planted along the outside of the meander bends to three feet from the top of bank, creating a
three-foot section along the top of bank. The live stakes will be spaced at least one per three linear feet
with alternate spacing vertically.
It is anticipated that the construction will be completed in the spring;therefore,vegetation planting will
be completed by March 15, and there will be at least 180 days until the initiation of the first year of
monitoring.Furthermore,any replanting that may occur throughout the monitoring phase of the Project
will occur between November 15 and March 15, per the October 2016 USACE/NCIRT monitoring
guidance.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 24 December 2020

Table 13. Proposed Plant List
le
Species Common Name Wetland Spacing' nit Type Zone Zone
Indicator 1 % 2 %
Status ill
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore FACW 9x6 Bare root 20 20
Betula nigra River birch OBL 9x6 Bare root 15 20
Quercus phellos Willow oak FAC 9x6 Bare root 15 10
Quercus alba White oak FACU 9x6 Bare root 10 0
Quercus rubra Northern red oak FACU 9x6 Bare root 10 0
Quercus shumardii Shumard oak FAC 9x6 Bare root 10 10
Cercis canadensis Eastern red bud FACU 9x6 Bare root 10 0
Cornus Florida Flowering dogwood FACU 9x6 Bare root 10 0
Cephalathus occidentalis Buttonbush OBL 9x6 Bare root 0 20
Quercus lyrata Overcup oak OBL 9x6 Bare root 0 20
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species
Species Common Name %of Total Species Composition
Salix nigra Black willow 40
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood 30
Populus deltoides Eastern cottonwood 30
On Site Invasive Species Management
Treatment for invasive species will be required within all grading limits associated with stream
restoration.Invasive species will require different and multiple treatment methods,depending on plant
phenology and the location of the species being treated.All treatment will be conducted as to maximize
its effectiveness and reduce chances of detriment to surrounding native vegetation.Treatment methods
will include mechanical (cutting with loppers, clippers, or chain saw) and chemical (foliar spray, cut
stump, and hack and squirt techniques). Plants containing mature,viable seeds,will be removed from
the Project and properly disposed. All herbicide applicators will be supervised by a certified ground
pesticide applicator with a North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(NCDA&CS)license and adhere to all legal and safety requirements according to herbicide labels,and
NC and Federal laws.Management records will be kept on the plant species treated,type of treatment
employed, type of herbicide used, application technique, and herbicide concentration and quantities
used. These records will be included in all reporting documents.
Soil Restoration
After construction activities,the subsoil will be scarified,and any compaction will be deep tilled before
the topsoil is placed back over the Project. Any topsoil that is removed during construction will be
stockpiled and placed over the Project during final soil preparation.Additionally,any unstable material
identified in the pond bed will be removed and replaced with material suitable for stream construction.
These processes should provide favorable soil conditions for plant growth throughout the Project.Rapid
establishment of vegetation will provide natural stabilization for the Project.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 25 December 2020

6.5 Mitigation Summary
Natural channel design techniques have been used to develop the restoration designs described in this
document. The combination of the analog and analytical design methods was determined to be
appropriate for this Project because the watershed is rural, the causes of disturbance are known and
have been abated,and there are minimal infrastructure constraints.The original design parameters were
developed from the measured analog/reference reach data and applied to the subject stream. The
parameters were then analyzed and adjusted through an iterative process using analytical tools and
numerical simulations of fluvial processes. The designs presented in this report provide for the
restoration of natural Piedmont gravel-bed channel features and stream bed diversity to improve benthic
habitat. The proposed design will allow flows that exceed the design bankfull stage to spread out over
the floodplain.
The majority of the existing stream will be filled using material excavated from the restoration channel.
Where possible, segments will be left partially filled to provide habitat diversity and flood storage.
Native woody material will be installed throughout the restored reach to reduce bank stress, provide
grade control,and increase habitat diversity.
Forested riparian buffers will be established along the Project reaches. An appropriate riparian plant
community(Piedmont Alluvial Forest)will be established to include a diverse mix of species.The plant
species list has been developed and can be found in Table 13. Although there is one planting zone,
certain targeted species will be planted in the appropriate target community location. Replanting of
native species will occur where the existing buffer is impacted during construction.
A combination of sediment control measures will be used on site; riparian buffer planting, bank
stabilization, stream restoration, livestock exclusions, and livestock watering facilities. This
combination of sediment control measures will ultimately lead to the functional uplift of the site by
minimizing sedimentation, nutrient input, and fecal coliform input from ongoing livestock and
agricultural production outside of the conservation easement.
Due to the nature of the project, complete avoidance of stream and wetland impacts is not possible.
Proposed permanent stream impacts will be due to stream relocation and temporary impacts will be due
to structure placement to improve long-term stability of the stream. Wetland impacts associated with
restoration and enhancement efforts will be both permanent and temporary,though small.However,it
is anticipated that the Project will result in net positive wetland area and overall function due to
increased hydrology from raising bed elevations and relocating channels within natural valleys. All
stream,wetland, and buffer impacts will be accounted for in the Pre-Construction Notification(PCN)
form.
6.6 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 14 are projections based upon project design (Figure 9). The
upstream-most 145 linear feet of the restoration of Reach RD2 is not currently being claimed for credit.
The beginning to restoration credit is located at a drop in the proposed profile and in the deepest portion
of the existing pond. The drainage area to this point is 17 acres(0.03 mi2). The flow in this portion of
RD2 will be monitored to determine if the reach meets the intermittent definition.Upon completion of
construction,the project components and credits data will only be revised to be consistent with the as-
built condition if there is a large discrepancy and with an approved mitigation plan addendum. This
will be approved by the USACE.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 26 December 2020

Table 14.Mitigation Credits
iii
Totals 2,489.200
Stream Mitigation
Existing Mitigation
Reach Mitigation Type Proposed Stationing Length engt SMUs 1
(LF) ELT') Ratio
RIM-A Restoration 0+02 to 1+76 183 174 1.0:1 174.000
RD1-B Enhancement II 1+76 to 7+64 588 588 2.5:1 235.200
RD2 Restoration,Pond 0+0 to 1+45 N/A 145 0:1* 0.000
RD2 Restoration 1+45 to 19+49 1,756 1.799 1.0:1 1,799.000
RD3-A Enhancement II 0+0 to 1+04 104 104 2.5:1 41.600
RD3-B Restoration 1+04 to 2+05 71 101 1.0:1 101.000
RD4-A Enhancement II 0+0 to 0+61 61 61 2.5:1 24.400
RD4-B Restoration 0+61 to 1+75 160 114 1.0:1 114.000
RD5 No Credit 0+0 to 1+19 119 119 0:1 0.000
RD6 No Credit 0+22 to 1+79 157 157 0:1 0.000
Totals 3,199 3,362 2,489.200
*Credit on the pond portion of RD2 will not be claimed until flow requirements for intermittent definition have been met
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 27 December 2020

7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The success criteria for the Project will follow accepted and approved performance standards presented
in the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and
subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
7.1 Stream Success Criteria
Bankfull Events
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years.Otherwise,the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
Surface Flow
Intermittent stream reaches will be monitored to document at least intermittent surface flow and the
maintenance of an Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM). This will be accomplished through direct
observation and the use of automatic-logging pressure transducers with data loggers (flow gauge).
Reaches must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow at any point during the year. A
flow gauge will be placed in the upper third of RD1-A, the non-credited portion of RD2, RD2, the
upper third of RD3 and the upper third of RD4-A.
Cross Sections
There should be little change in as-built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition(for example down-
cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks,or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall
be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should
fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.Bank height ratio
shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored riffle cross
sections(for C and E streams).
Digital Image Stations
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation,bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation. Cross section, vegetation plot, stage recorder, and flow gauge locations will be used as
permanent digital image stations.
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project
will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the
survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, a minimum of 260
five-year old trees at 7 feet in height at the end of Year 5,and the final vegetative success criteria will
be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will be
counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports. In order for a volunteer
tree to count towards success criteria,it must be a species on the approved planting list and be present
for at least two growing seasons.Moreover,any single species can only account for up to 50 percent
of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot.Any stems in excess of 50 percent will be
shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success. Additionally, invasive
species will be monitored and controlled to under five percent of the easement area.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 28 December 2020

8 MONITORING PLAN
Monitoring will be conducted for seven years post-construction. Annual monitoring data will be
reported using the IRT monitoring template. The monitoring report shall provide a project data
chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends, research purposes, and
assist in decision making regarding project close-out.Monitoring reports will be prepared annually and
submitted to the USACE. Monitoring of the Project will adhere to metrics and performance standards
established by the USACE's April 2003 Wilmington District Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the
IRT's October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.Table
15 outlines the links between project goals,objectives,and treatments and their associated monitoring
metrics and performance standards. The monitoring plan is presented in Figure 11.
8.1 As-Built Survey
An as-built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel size,condition, and
location.The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg,water surface,bankfull,and top of bank
to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by USACE.
8.2 Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year
by qualified individuals.The visual assessments will include vegetation density,vigor,invasive species,
and easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete stream
walk and structure inspection. Digital images will be taken at fixed representative locations to record
each monitoring event, as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Fixed image locations
will exist at each cross section,each vegetation plot,each stage recorder,and each flow gauge.Results
of visual monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas
and digital images. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or
degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control
measures.Longitudinal photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an
excessive increase in channel depth.Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing
degradation of the banks over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional
maturation of riparian vegetation.
8.3 Hydrology Events
Continuous stage recorders, a combination of manual crest gauges and automatic-logging pressure
transducers, will be installed to document the height and frequency of bankfull events on Priority 1
Restoration reaches. A minimum of one gauge will be installed on each tributary that is greater than
1,000 feet in length, with one gauge required for every 5,000 feet of length on each tributary and a
maximum of five gauges per tributary. Where restoration or enhancement activities are proposed for
intermittent streams,monitoring flow gauges should be installed to track the frequency and duration of
stream flow events. Specifically, a stage recorder will be installed on the lower third of reach RD2.
Additionally, flow gauges, an automatic-logging pressure transducer, will be installed on the upper
third of reaches RD1-A,the non-credited portion of RD2,RD2, RD3-A and RD4-A to document flow
conditions.
8.4 Cross Sections
Permanent cross sections will be installed at approximately one per 20 bankfull widths with half in
pools and half in riffle on all Restoration reaches. Morphological data will be measured and recorded
for all cross-sections; however, only riffle cross sections will include bank height ratio and
entrenchment ratio measurements. A total of 18 cross sections are proposed across the Project. These
cross sections will be monitored in Years 1,2, 3, 5,and 7.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 29 December 2020

8.5 Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring plots will be 100 square meters,or 0.025 acres,in size and cover a minimum of
two percent of the planted area. There will be 17 plots within the planted area(20.94 acres). Plots will
be a mixture of fixed and random plots, with twelve fixed plots and five random plots. Planted area
indicates all area in the easement that will be planted with trees.Existing wooded areas are not included
in the planted area; however, these areas will be planted with supplemental trees in disturbed areas
where existing tree density is insufficient. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the fixed
plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. For random plots, species and
height will be recorded for all woody stems. The location (GPS coordinates and orientation) of the
random plots will be identified in the annual monitoring reports. Vegetation will be planted and plots
established at least 180 days prior to the initiation of the first year of monitoring.Monitoring will occur
in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 between July 1st and leaf drop. Any revegetation or replanting should be
conducted between November 15th and March 15th. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored so
that none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. If necessary, RES
will develop a species-specific treatment plan.
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting
A baseline monitoring report and as-built drawings documenting stream restoration activities will be
developed within 60 days of the planting completion on the Project. The report will include all
information required by IRT mitigation plan guidelines, including elevations, photographs and
sampling plot locations,gauge locations,and a description of initial species composition by community
type. The report will also include a list of the species planted and the associated densities. Baseline
vegetation monitoring will include species,height,date of planting,and grid location of each stem.The
baseline report will follow USACE guidelines.
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology will be assessed to determine the
success of the mitigation.The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final
success criteria are achieved,whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports must be completed for all seven years. Monitoring reports will be prepared in the
fall of each year and submitted to the IRT no later than April 1st of the year. The monitoring reports
will include all information and be in the format required by USACE.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 30 December 2020

Table 15.Monitoring Requirements
reatmen utcome Monitoring Performance Standard
Metric
To transport Convert land-use Improve the
water from the of Project transport of
watershed to reaches from water from the
the channel in cropland to watershed to the NA NA
a non-erosive riparian forest Project reaches
in a non-erosive
manner
way
Stage recorders: Four bankfull events occurring in
Reduce bank Inspected separate
height ratios Imprboaveflood quarterly years
nk
To transport increase Flow gauge: At least 30 days of continuous
water in a entrenchment connectivity by Inspected y
stable non- ratios b reducing bank flow each year
quarterly
y height ratios and
erosive reconstructing Entrenchment ratio shall be no
increase Cross sections:
manner channels to entrenchment Surve ed in less than 2.2 within restored
mimic reference y reaches
reach conditions ratios yeand 7 3 5 Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2
As-built stream NA
profile
Reduce erosion
Establish a rates and Cross sections: Entrenchment ratio shall be no
riparian buffer to channel stability Surveyed in less than 2.2 within restored
reduce erosion to reference reaches
To create a and sediment reach conditions years 1,2,3,5 Bank height ratio shall not exceed
diverse transport into and 7 1.2
bedform project streams. Improve
Visual Identifyand document significant
Establish stable bedform g
To achieve banks with live diversity(pool monitoring: stream problem areas;i.e.
dynamic Performed at
stakes,erosion spacing,percent erosion,degradation,
equilibrium control matting, riffles,etc. least aggradation,etc.
and other in semiannually
Vegetation plots:
stream structures. Increase buffer MY 1-3:320 trees/acre
width to 50 feet Surveyed in MY 5:260 trees/acre(7 ft.tall)
years 1,2,3,5 MY 7:210 trees/acre(10 ft.tall)
and 7
To achieve Vegetation plots:
appropriate Improve stream Surveyed in MY 1-3:320 trees/acre
years 1,2,3,5
levels for temperature MY 5:260 trees/acre(7 ft.tall)
an7
water regulation (indirect MY 7:210 trees/acre(10 ft.tall)
temperature, through
dissolved introduction of measurement)
Visual
oxygen
concentration, Plant or protect canopy assessment of
riparian buffer established
and other Decrease
important nutrient loading conservation Inspect signage.
nutrients through signage: Identify and document any
including but filtration of Performed at damaged or missing
not limited to planted riparian least signs
Nitrogen and buffer semiannually
Phosphorus (indirect
measurement)
°This category is measured indirectly
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 31 December 2020

9 INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. RES will treat invasive
species vegetation within the project area and provide remedial action on a case-by-case basis.Common
invasive species vegetation, such as Chinese privet, multiflora rose, tree-of-heaven, and Japanese
honeysuckle, will be treated to allow native plants to become established within the conservation
easement.Invasive species vegetation will be treated by approved mechanical and/or chemical methods
such that the percent composition of exotic/invasive species is less than five percent of the total riparian
buffer area.Any control methods requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with
NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA)rules and regulations. If areas of invasive species exist within
the easement,they will be monitored yearly as part of the monitoring protocol and treated if necessary.
If required,problem areas will continue to be treated until the project easement shows overall trending
towards meeting all monitoring requirements.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 32 December 2020

10 MAINTENANCE PLAN
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection will be conducted a minimum
of once per year throughout the post construction monitoring period until performance standards are
met.These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance.
Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction
and may include the following:
Table 16.Maintenance Plan
Component/F=11=1 Maintenance through project close-out
Stream Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental
installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel.Areas where
stormwater and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance
to prevent bank failures and head-cutting. Stream maintenance activities will be
documented and reported in annual monitoring reports. Stream maintenance will
continue through the monitoring period.
Vegetation Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant
species shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation
control requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC
Department of Agriculture (NCDA)rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance
activities will be documented and reported in annual monitoring reports.Vegetation
maintenance will continue through the monitoring period.
Project Boundary Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between
the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries will be marked with signs
identifying the property as a mitigation site and will include the name of the long-
term steward and a contact number.Boundaries may be identified by fence,marker,
bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or
conservation easement.Boundary markers disturbed,damaged,or destroyed will be
repaired and/or replaced on an as-needed basis. Easement monitoring and
staking/signage maintenance will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Livestock Fence Livestock fencing is to be placed outside the easement limits.Maintenance of fencing
is the responsibility of the landowner after the project has closed out.
Beaver Routine site visits and monitoring will be used to determine if beaver management
is needed. If beaver activity poses a threat to project stability or vegetative success,
RES will trap beavers and remove impoundments as needed.All beaver management
activities will be documented and included in annual monitoring reports. Beaver
monitoring and management will continue through the monitoring period.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 33 December 2020

11 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of project construction, RES will implement the post-construction monitoring
protocols previously defined in this document. Project maintenance will be performed as described
previously in this document. If,during the course of annual monitoring,it is determined that the site's
ability to achieve site performance standards are jeopardized, RES will notify the USACE of the need
to develop a Plan of Corrective Action.If beaver activity poses a threat to project stability or vegetative
success,RES will trap beavers and remove impoundments as needed.All beaver management activities
will be documented and included in annual monitoring reports. Once the Corrective Action Plan is
prepared and finalized RES will:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and/or required by the USACE.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Prepare Corrective Action Plan for review and approval by IRT.
5. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
6. Provide the IRT a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions.This document shall depict the extent
and nature of the work performed.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 34 December 2020

12 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the approved mitigation
plan of the site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary
Department of the Army (DA) authorization has been received for its construction or the District
Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA
authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the
IRT,will determine if performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements
of the release schedules below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met,credits
may still be released depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or
be extended,depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard.
The release of Project credits will be subject to the criteria described in Table 17.
12.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits,as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the IRT
with written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
1. Execution of the(U)MBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2. Approval of the final mitigation plan;
3. Mitigation site must be secured;
4. Delivery of financial assurances;
5. Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6. Issuance of the 404-permit verification for construction of the site,if required.
7. Documentation of the establishment of the long-term endowment/escrow account
12.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
The second credit release will occur after the completion of implementation of the Mitigation Plan and
IRT approval of the Baseline Monitoring Report and As-built Survey. All subsequent credit releases
must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a determination that required
performance standards have been achieved. As projects approach milestones associated with credit
release, the Sponsor will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur.This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 35 December 2020

Table 17. Stream Credit Release Schedule
tre, •dit Release Schedule
Release Interim Total
Milestone Credit Release Activity Release Released
1 Site Establishment(includes all required criteria stated above) 15% 15%
2 Baseline Monitoring Report and As-built Survey 15% 30%
3 First year monitoring report demonstrates performance 10% 40%
standards are being met.
4 Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance 10% 50%
standards are being met.
5 Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance 10% 60%
standards are being met.
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance 5% 65%
6 standards are being met. (75%**)
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance 10% 75%
standards are being met. (85%**)
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance 5% 80%
8 standards are being met. (90%**)
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance 10% 90%
9 standards are being met,and project has received close-out (100%**)
approval.
**10%reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 36 December 2020

13 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval of the Project by the IRT,the Project will be transferred to Unique Places To Save:
Unique Places to Save
[phone]
PO Box 1183
Chapel Hill,NC 27514
www.UP2Suniqueplacestosave.org
Unique Places To Save (UP2S)will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Project to ensure that
restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld.
Easements held by the UP2S are stewarded in general accordance with the guidelines published by the
National Land Trust Alliance. These guidelines include annual monitoring visits to easements and
related communication with the landowner(s). During the visit a standard report is completed and
pictures taken for the record. If violation of the easement terms is found within the Project area,UP2S
works with the landowner to ensure the problem is rectified. When appropriate UP2S pursues legal
action to enforce the easement terms.UP2S typically requires the Project developer to install standard
UP2S signage as part of the easement transfer package. This includes well marked corners of the
easement boundary,as well as plastic or metal signs identifying the easement.The current sign standard
is a six-inch by six-inch aluminum sign with contact information. Signs are refreshed as needed.
Typically,a sign will last five to ten years before it is no longer legible due to fading from the sun.
UP2S requires an endowment for each easement it agrees to hold. Endowments are sized so that the
interest from the principal will pay the expected monitoring costs for that easement. This assumes a
seven-year monitoring period for the Project during which UP2S will not incur any expenses. It also
assumes a five percent annual return. This flat fee includes a property walkthrough, report, pictures,
sign installation, etc. Funding will be provided upfront to UP2S upon the easement closing in the
amount of$39,242.86.This fee ensures annual Site inspections occur and the terms of the conservation
easement are legally defended into perpetuity. An overview of the UP2S Easement Stewardship
program and the details on the specific endowment fee is included in Appendix C.
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 37 December 2020

14 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
CONFIDENTIAL
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of a $506,000 Construction Performance
Bond to the USACE to assure completion of mitigation construction and planting. Construction and
planting costs are estimated to be at or below$506,000 based on the Engineer's construction materials
estimate and recent bid tabulation unit costs for construction materials. Following completion of
construction and planting the Construction Performance Bond will be retired and a $207,000
Maintenance and Monitoring Performance Bond will be provided to assure completion of seven years
of monitoring and reporting, and any remedial work required during the monitoring period. The
$207,000 amount includes contingency and estimated monitoring costs from the Engineer. The
Maintenance and Monitoring Performance Bond will be reduced by $29,500 following approval of
each annual monitoring report. The Maintenance and Monitoring Performance Bond will be retired in
total following official notice of site close-out from the IRT.Financial assurances shall be payable to a
standby trust or other designee at the direction of the obligee.Financial assurances structured to provide
funds to the USACE in the event of default by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable. A financial
assurance must be in the form that ensures that the USACE receives notification at least 120 days in
advance of any termination or revocation. The Performance Bonds will be provided by a surety listed
with the U.S. Treasury and has an A.M. Best Rating of B or above. All Performance Bonds will be
submitted to the USACE in draft form for approval prior to execution. In the event of Sponsor default,
UP2S has agreed to receive the funds and ensure the work is successfully completed.
Table 18. Financial Assurances
Construction Cost• IND
General(e.g.mobilization,erosion control,etc.) $100,000
Sitework $85,000
Structures(e.g.ditch plugs,logs,rocks,coir,etc.) $170,000
Crossings $6,000
Vegetation $65,000
Miscellaneous/Admin Fees $80,000
Total $506,000
Monitoring Costs
Monitoring Set-Up,As-Built,&Equipment $19,000
Year 1 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Year 2 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Year 3 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Year 4 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Year 5 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Year 6 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Year 7 Monitoring and Report $10,000
Maintenance and Contingency $118,000
Total $207,000
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 38 December 2020

15 REFERENCES
Cowardin,L.M.,V. Carter,F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States.U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Office of Biological
Services,FWS/OBS-79/31.U.S. Depailnient of the Interior,Washington,DC.
Doll,B.A.,A.D. Dobbins,J. Spooner,D.R. Clinton and D.A.Bidelspach. (2003).Hydraulic
Geometry Relationships for Rural North Carolina Coastal Plain Streams.NC Stream
Restoration Institute,Report to N.C. Division of Water Quality for 319 Grant Project No.
EW20011.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1.U.S.Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
Fischenich,C. 2001. "Stability thresholds for stream restoration materials." ERDC Technical Note
No. EMRRP-SR-29,U.S.Army Engineer Research and Development Center,Vicksburg,
Miss.
Fischenich,J.C.,2006.Functional Objectives for Stream Restoration,EMRRP Technical Notes
Collection(ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-52),US Army Engineer Research and Development
Center,Vicksburg,Mississippi. (available online at
http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/sr52.pdf)
Harman,W.H. et al. 1999.Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
AWRA Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited By: D.S. Olsen and J.P.
Potyondy.AWRA Summer Symposium.Bozeman,MT.
Harman,W.,R. Starr,M. Carter,K. Tweedy,M. Clemmons,K. Suggs,C.Miller.2012.A Function-
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects.US Environmental
Protection Agency,Office of Wetlands,Oceans,and Watersheds,Washington,DC EPA 843-
K-12-006.
Johnson PA. 2006.Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions.U.S.
Depailment of Transportation.Federal Highway Administration. Report Number FHWA-
HRT-05-072.
Krstolic,J.L.,and Chaplin,J.J. (2007).Bankfull regional curves for streams in the non-urban,non-
tidal Coastal Plain Physiographic Province,Virginia and Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey
Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5162,48 p. (available online at
http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2007-5162)
North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2B .0248). Randleman Lake Water Supply
Watershed:Nutrient Management Strategy. Effective on April 1, 1999.Amended May 1,2010.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2017. "NC Surface Water Classifications."
Surface Water Classification.
https://file s.nc.gov/ncdeq/W ater%20Quality/Planning/C SU/Surface%20 W ater/River%20Basi
n%20Water%20Quality%20Classifications%20as%20of/o20Dec%209%202013/CapeFear H
ydroorder.pdf (Accessed September 2019).
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 39 December 2020

NCDWR. 2011.A Guide to Surface Freshwater Classifications in North Carolina. Raleigh.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-
standards/classifications#DWRPrimaryClassification; accessed September 2019.
NCDENR 2012b. "2012 North Carolina 303(d)Lists-Category 5."Water Quality Section.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/home. (Accessed September 2019).
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services(NCDMS). "Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009."
Rosgen,D.(1996),Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition,Wildland Hydrology,Pagosa Springs,CO
Schafale,M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina,Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,Division of Parks and Recreation,NCDENR,
Raleigh,NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers(USACE),2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2,
December 24,2002.
USACE. 2003.April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region(Version 2.0),ed. J. S. Wakeley,R.W. Lichvar,and
C.V.Noble. ERDC/EL TR 10-20.Vicksburg,MS: U.S.Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
USACE. 2018. Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator.
USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS).
1986.Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55.
USDA NRCS. 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook(NEH 654),USDA
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
1994.Soil Survey ofJohnston County,North Carolina.
USDA NRCS. 2010.Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States,Version 7.0. L.M.Vasilas,
G.W.Hurt,and C.V.Noble (eds.).USDA,NRCS,in cooperation with the National Technical
Committee for Hydric Soils.
USDA NRCS. Web Soil Survey;http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov(September 2019).
United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). 1999.EPA Manual. Quantifying Physical
Habitat in Wadeable Streams.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service."Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina."
North Carolina Ecological Services.http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/.(September 2014).
Feed and Seed Mitigation Plan 40 December 2020

Figures
Figure 1 —Project Vicinity
Figure 2 —Landowner Parcels
Figure 3 —USGS Quadrangle
Figure 4 —Land use
Figure 5 —Existing Conditions
Figure 6 —National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7 —Mapped Soils
Figure 8 —Historical Conditions
Figure 9 — Conceptual Plan
Figure 10 — FEMA Constraints
Figure 11 — Monitoring Plan

q`P Mike'sW Metal
z
Letters& elding
-
bor Ln
K
2
N
y�
U,
411
Foster View Or
Beeson's
Rhododendron Nursery
Steed R,
Steed R,,
Nem View Dr C',
O
QD stecdRd 5\�Re ,aF
2 2 Stem Rd
ir
I
CF
4 �co
G7
111
S.
Aa
i Burlington Mebane
ti Greensboro I sboroug
`''R7 Exd
m
Feed and Seed Project
DavisW. rService` lik
t
t
rDay's Coun'.
1193E1 f .j
o' a
e
I19N1 0 Ramseur Slier City E'r
As -•oro
Legend
70
Sea rove
Proposed Easement ;;�_'
1
HUC: 03030003010070
Cape Fear River Basin-03030003 - Oe ° car.
Randleman Lake Service Area ' Ca
fl
N Figure 1 -Project Vicinity Date: 12/7/2020
E. 0 res
����� ����YI1tiV■Y `" �_F ::e:YbYG:.,.. _,
rye' 0 500 1,000
il
11
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet

. '
— •
, -
s v:,1414 ....ii
FL° ,
1 q..-....____, '-• ,-.1 Ste • t \ 4,ks. % 1 •1. ,„,,., °
IN r -44 • 4 ' 1,.."... .40' 4 '' , .... . ...:41.
-
4.
"4,4,•°
-3.
.;
,
', 41-
''.
A, DAVIS,RYAN,SYLVESTER SR,
,•', .',,401,14ii. , z.,„*I.V.0,;45 - At 4i- g
DAVISIrJULtIETA-Nkby
:t,
DAVIS,RYAN,(DAVIS,TONI 0)
-,', ,,,' t lo.'_744(‘,,,...
- ,...
-0 P`, * :, , i• 77-4778-9-8-C-46 1114-710447, ,,,•_(:',,..-,..44t,-." 4;
: .
, . . ..... -;v
, .. 1.)
_....-
--41111111441eAMIN1011111- •
. .
_ ,.„.A....
,
,'..`
•
r4- ,. oltr
•P .4„,., ''..,,•f „„• .
, ,. - •
.
-'•It\t... , ''V,..‘:-**'","' " ., . • . •
_ ' ' ', .,•"*,....
IIN•
4 '''''' •,.. _ _ ,,
- * e
',A. •• , - • , .,
v ‘
-),-. ....,., ' •,. ; „, ,
N,
1 ••\,-' ' ,
DAVIS,RYAN *
(DAVIS,ToNI O)
r
7747565971 *4
DAyIS,FtYi!kN
• P6915 f, .
' ,‘• e 04 (DAVIS,TON(0)
7747665722
,
-.., •• 0, ".t. 11. "
• --. * x, ,,,,,,,,.„., Ai:1j,
' _ •
4.- _ ,,,A,v400, „ .,,.• 1Wit
,,,.• , .,,,,,.. ;'..-4:,.. . ... ..--- ._..1 .
SN
f'e ,
2 ,'•,2 , , - ,
•-• 2. _ , _ - .2 „ ,
=
Legend
Proposed Easement • i *,45„)..,
.* a r
,..„
Project Parcel
•-•
N Figure 2-Landowner Parcels Date: 12/16/2020
=
0
w+E
600 Drawn by GDS
Feed and Seed
i iiiiNtleiso s Mitigation Site Checked by JRM res
300
il
11 1 inch=600 feet
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina
',,'

__ , f., _;,:, _,___;_7_,...___. ._ :Au wrz.zi.2,,c,.(4),__________...„___.: w , .., , \.:_.,,‘, _ ,, _ ,i, _ :. !Pi
,,e, ,
__.,...„,....., ..,.... '5 it - A. 1 i. 1-4,11
,/,;) . ,/ \ . ,
'___)... fib
4' �� � "
7 lialvic, __
... lit \-.. "'
rAZ . , 1 -, ) ,,- 7, - -_, ,,‘ .
_ \_fr ., .
V _
��Pl..; , ,‘, • . Air- , - 7} t i ...di
`�� ! t
1411iii s iifi., -j 1 •/"...\,, 1 RD6 /--,
I 178 ac
j u : r
,��.�- 4ac ,ii° )' ' I
'ai
Oodar(I i
J41uzre "
0 4,,44 . ... . .
t p .44._--.. _, ! .
1 I‘f( , I.. ,
.74 --4''''''''''
RD4 /4
if J, :*••
ti
1 k
i ��++ RD3 15ac . _
J ;�I ,3ts1 7 ac nr�
i 11 �, RD2 °
f / o r' . 73ac o
"v-.----)..::::\___,_., ° ' '
•
\ ...1—LJF6 .!
•
•
Legend
-� - %
Proposed Easement �( \I^ +,
t _" ,_„ . , (' 9 .i
�_ Drainage Area ,? ,,
ta',
" Figure 3-USGS Quadrangle Date: 12/7/2020
�� Pleasant Garden (1983)
+r�*;irw��U1,.04-A, 0 w s E res
-+�*y;,......�;!>..�� Drawn by: GDS
aryiLl `.1� Feed and Seed
+r�r` 0 1,000 2,000 Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
Feet Randol•h Count North Carolina 1 inch=2,000 feet

'lir '' i
a•— f .J @f .;......',. ' i .1 Ci.
. . . .,,
,1„... ...- , ,
-1),,, tt 7....' . 45- . ::: ,...., ,, , 4, • ' 1"P'
1 .
4 IA
`, -
I •
. r
fkr • ' . .
y
4U 1
1, I
it
•
46
Legend
•
Proposed Easement '
4
._ Drainage Areas !i
Land use
Pasture 28%
Forest 27% •
-
Row Crop 27% .
Residential 15%
Impervious 2%
a Brush 0.4%
Open Water 0.3%
N Figure 4- Land use Date: 12/7/2020
E. -��1ry�1;24.���.4w., Feed and Seed0 rps
Drawn by:GDS
..
iY)tl ■�1..�
+fir` 0 350 700 Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=700 feet

Abe
i:
o Culvert
%
V
tc.l b
4
‘
Legend
r
Proposed Easement 3
i1 I
Project Parcel ssrrr,r
M Existing Wetland
'' ` Pond f, - ,
ot �..1
Stream Determination '�
1'
r,
`Perennial �Y
--- Intermittent
g
T PowerlineApprox
Stream Origin
N Figure 5-Existing Conditions Date: 12/7/2020
E. � "14,4017•41/4-mito w+E
-�j 444 111, I►�J��.4�� Drawn by:GDS
Feed and Seed
Ores
rr>r�� ■`tI
+ray 0 300 600 Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

,- -,,,....-•,,$.4,1* stee .ri -
(
.'r - -
/ 4.c
, - -, PF01A '
4:44
41t40 . . 11"PAB4Hh ...-." ' '4
PUBHh - ,44/
*
w.,.-
,. , PUBHh . .„,a, 4.,
////1/- , itittoisot
• PF01A
/
/
gte,/ ,...4
4. .44“ NN4 1\
le /
-*
.,,,.,k •'.-, .4:14-t, -4=-, ' °^, • `v 4 4 "4,s4.' i 1, 'or,,;.-^',‘ t4,4,.
" -4 1 .'." , '`..,n :,„;."'1,'"‘4i,'7't1/4.,,t ',,,,,' ':.%$*4`,,,•,'‘ , ''',.'8,, '''. 1 * t , ' '
‘, y i• ,'''',` -% "s\ \ • '1,-''-- ' ''''<i; * "" %Aok , -
e s
73
PUBHh
' .
a
_ ,
,.,
tr 4
4 4f,. K\ 'it vratig
, .
1;\ , 0 \ 1,, ,
R*, _
0 , Ptc,q1s.f• l'Illr"
i
. GINIEt .:...
4-br7 ' , . 1
-° '
...
R.,
,
02Z4b Ct.111)VD
elk '
. .
r rr firr„rll''' '
_,...../.
, -,--r i...._''- ---.'„ - .-
t '
N '
r ,-
.--".' ...Z.....'
. .
4.,
I,• 7 "---• ' I
+!".'. .7* ' ''. ' * ' ' ' s 12.,ifirOk ;e!,.
Legend 0 ,
i r-j PEM1Ah . •• t
., *1 ,
Proposed Easement
,
,M NW Wetland (USFWS 05/01/2020) . *Of/
. , , -
. -
/,
:.! N Figure 6-National Wetlands Date 12/7/2020
,,,t: _,.,10.41,44.2.04.14...11,44411.411114411, Inventory ,///
+E
Drawn by GDS
1 aolgroAtiVARVAII,...;. Feed and Seed ores
,..4,1040 s
300 600 Mitigation Site Checked by JRM
.-:. Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet
.,,.

C.---------_,V................._/9 i _ 'sso
ats
VVtB ,c2zt,
J ,, _ , ...
.. ,
, _ .. ,
",,,,,,I,
t," ,,_ , ' .
.. .
,_
•
U ,
C�`
,{'Cot,
.-., r' MS
Ill
/ .� McB2
/ 1/
r
r•
i
" r r . .-._
s
Legend p`
Proposed Easementita i, 7t. .
r Rd
Hydric (100%) 1
Predominantly Hydric (66-99%) ��,
r-
Partially Hydric (33-65%) WtC , '_ , _ _,
MI Predominantly Nonhydric (1-32%) Map unit symbol Map unit name
MeB2 Mecklenburg clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Nonhydric (0%) WpC Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott corn plex,8 to 15 percent slopes
N Figure 7-Mapped Soils Date: 12/7/2020
E. ��"�t'�1.f1•;.$41 w e Drawn by: GDS res
-•�-+-g-io•, Feed and Seed
Prrgat�r�1J
•ryj,` 0 300 600 Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

19481: , . a
1969 ry :
M0;0 ° ::.; ti:.,,,,44,
- .:;,,,,, 4' ,t4 i,.,,,,./:,:t',,,,,,,,,,... ii' � ,
a ';:- 44' 'i ' t < ,-' -,:4 --,At.,a
k .
a. Ty
k
r
fix* 'jh
T/
Source:USGS Earth Explorer pp�,, Source: USGS Earth Explorer
iii
1993 I 'ice ' '1977 ' �. z ` y
*� i ram, 6.
. "alb,. Y Ida '
..weir f •
•
30
•
f
..viall*
•
, k°4 $ , I
A � i
liti,-- :,'
' _ " t - Source:NCOne Map
e" /14:1? '
�. Legend
Ilik
'jd. Source:NCOneMap,
411111
Proposed Easement
N,,,
Figure 8-Historical Conditions Date: 12/7/2020
�`"i���Ill�`��ti�Y..,
W E Drawn by: GDS rs
�••�-+-i—r,♦•, Feed and Seed
♦�. o 500 t,000 Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet

i_________ Asa IV it ,
Paill''. ,
NIO, I ,
411 lir , _
,.
Remove Debris
4. ,
Remove Ro,4-
Old Fence
' \ _-
Remove Debris
/m
ov
Ce
10
/ co.
Legend RD3_q
_ Proposed Easement-(27.58 ac) // N Remove Culvert
Project Parcel [-----
\_
Parcels 1 I I
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Approach* Landowner to Fill Hole
Restoration(Pond Footprint),0-100' and Cover with Topsoil
ii
Restoration,0-100' i
In Enhancement,0-100'
"?'''
Restoration,101-200' ,,.177
Enhancement,101-200' _. ,
111111 Stream Mitigation
Approach Reach ID Mitigation Length Ratio SMU
RD1-A Restoration 174 1.0 1 174.000
Restoration RD1-B Enhancement II 588 2.5:1 235.200
RD2 Restoration,Pond 145 0:1` 0
Enhancement II " RD2 Restoration 1,799 1.0:1 1,799.000
ti
j RD3-A Enhancement II 104 2.5:1 41.600
—— No Credit RD3-B Restoration 101 1.0:1 101.000
""— RD4-A Enhancement II 61 2.5:1 24.400
87 )— Proposed Fenceline RD4-B Restoration 114 1.0:1 114.000
RD5 No Mitigation 119 N/A 0
0 Proposed ESP *Crediting shown in RD6 No Mitigation 157 N/A 0
Appendix A Totals 3,362 2,469200
`Credit on the pond portion of RD2 will not be claimed until flow requirements for intermittent definition have been met
" Figure 9-Conceptual Plan Date: 12/7/2020
_Z.w.0.10jA.._:, w E Pres
r. •• 7;n 74;%1 f Drawn by: GDS
�•= +:.o•.��-. Feed and Seed
��'40 0 300 600 Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
I
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

et* .
. PANEL
1 .
3710774800K lb'
eat 1/2/2008 .4. .,
•
,. \v..
— -
.
.1
*.,
_ s,o
n .,..Ittz.
i rl..., .I'
0
.,
o-
r-4-,
,
,
-
w
''''. ' . 4k
,
.,„ -,, PANE • 11
'* Nta • '. •
,4100 WilITY0/,. ,
00 0
00 • 7) .. .
do,i ivy 2008
---- 4 •
4 ,
.... g _
.2 r I* s, rrr '"
rilhili ,....0
...... , .,.
'Legend tit-- , k 1•
, J.Y...
Proposed Easement
t vo.
11— FEMA Zone AE (none)
0 2°/0 Chance Annual Flood (none)
. -
FEMA Regulatory Floodway (none) O '' 7-* ' t- ., '
to
:.! _
N Figure 10-National Flood Hazard Date: 12/7/2020
Checked by JRM Ores
., .;,,,‘11%%4),ZILlm IF 041-.74;1,o Feed and Seed Drawn by GDS
a ftv4tillilts...L.A." S
'Ee 44,..s. Mitigation Site
..51' 0 300 600
11 1 inch=600 feet
',,' Feet Randolph County, North Carolina

.... Pres
AV 4 '''.11111111, N
, r r 4,isyt,rFy ���
S
- - � yy� , ,�s * 0 150 300
1
'''¢ * Oe 1-yr _ 0�1 Feet
toot
XII,
� xr Figure 11 -Monitoring Plan
Feed and Seed
Mitigation Site
Randolph County,
ROr North Carolina
Date: 12/7/2020 Drawn by: GDS
���,
Checked by:xxx 1 in=300 feet
,t....., Leqend
.�`' ��' Proposed Easement
*1;7d�¢, �ic , x . , ,. ;.. Approach
. f ' °, r= —Restoration
"� � � ,�k� fa s yy,, yy,, ,�p t
ogioir,_,
`�` _- -
ti� ,,,� m � � t � � Enhancement II
,`�`` \ --No Credit
} 4
j
Proposed Cross Sections
�i 1 Vegetation Plot Type
1111111t‘t Buffer only
+ < Stream and Buffer
_ ♦ Random
•
� - :,_- Type
{ PiedmontAlluvial Forest-
N\18.13 ac
_ w
x Supplemental-0.31 ac
/��� Piedmont Headwater
. ,
Forest 2.50 ac
,,, , Gauge Type
03�� = r _ . iu a ® Flow Gauge
Ni
Note: There will be 12 fixed vegetation plots, ® Stage Recorder
go and 5 will be randomly placed each monitoring year.
Flow gauge, stage recorder, cross section, and +�..! i! 4�L�\\
. f " vegetation plot locations are all proposed locations. �•w+►_i����.4044 jib
Fixed digital image locations will occur at each ���.►`'�
cross section, vegetation plot, stage recorder, and ION
Oev• ' d flow gauge.
Is 4147h...

Appendix A
• Feed and Seed Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan

3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
r 5
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
July 8, 2020
Katie Merritt
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
512 N Salisbury St. Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan, DWR Project Number: 2018-1397 V1
Listed below are comments provided by DWR on May 29, 2020 regarding the Feed and Seed
Buffer Mitigation Plan and RES' responses.
Title Page/Footer/General — In the memo from Todd back in August, it was decided that we will
be calling these something other than BPDP when they are attached as an Appendix to the
Stream Mitigation Plan. This is a buffer only bank, so we will be calling this Appendix, the Buffer
Mitigation Plan. Change Buffer Parcel Development Plan to "Buffer Mitigation Plan (Plan)"
throughout this document and where it is necessary in the Stream Plan.
All instances where the term Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) is used throughout this
document and the Stream Mitigation Plan have been updated to say Buffer Mitigation Plan (Plan).
Title Page (Pg. 1)—This project is version one. Change the DWR Project Number from Version
2 ("V2"), to Version 1 ("V1").
The DWR Project Number Version has been changed to V1.
Table of Contents (Pg. 2) —Add the Site Viability Letter to this Plan as an appendix rather than
making it part of the overall plan since the viability letter is strictly for buffer mitigation. Call it
Appendix AB.
The Site Viability Letter has been included in this plan as Appendix AB.
Section 1, 1st Paragraph/General —Throughout, instead of"EBX" it says "EBX, LLC." Please
correct all errors to read "EBX" instead of"EBX, LLC."
All instances that previously read "EBX, LLC" have been corrected to just "EBX" throughout the
document.
Section 1.2, Table 1. (Pg. 4) —Add an "*" next to "Restoration via Pond" and to the bottom of
this table. * should read, "only viable for buffer credit if EBX performs stream restoration through
the pond bottom."
This note has been added to the bottom of Table 1.
Section 3, 2nd Paragraph (Pg. 10) —Add the words "on this site" after "In forested areas".
This revision has been made to Section 3.
Section 3, 2nd Paragraph (Pg. 10) — In the 3rd sentence, remove "and enhancement areas are
determined as being higher than 25 percent but lower than what is deemed appropriate for the

location..." After the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)(12), end the
3rd sentence there. Add a fourth sentence saying, "The buffer enhancement areas on this site
are determined based on long term and current presence of cattle and assessed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)."
these revisions have been made to Section 3.
Section 3.1, 2nd Paragraph (Pg. 10) — Planting a permanent seed mix that is abundant in
annual and perennial pollinator species is strictly voluntary but is being encouraged by DWR in
other mitigation plans to promote diversity and enhance the health of the herbaceous layer,
which can also greatly benefit planted stems. Are any of these seed mixes pollinator friendly?
Isn't there a list of your seed mix somewhere in this Plan that you can reference?
A list of the seed mix RES intends to use can be referenced in section P1 and P2 of the Plan
Set within Appendix H of the Stream Mitigation Plan. A sentence was added to this paragraph
to reference where the seed mixture can be found. Several pollinator-friendly species (both
seed and tree) can be found, including blackeyed susan, common milkweed, showy goldenrod,
eastern red bud, and flowering dogwood. As we do not buy the seed mix until closer to the
actual date of construction, the actual seeds bought is dependent on the alignment of the
germination and time period of seeding along with the availability and cost at the time. RES will
continue to consider this request in all future projects.
Section 3.2, 1st Paragraph (Pg. 11) — Revise the first sentence to say, "Restoration is proposed
within the riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas of the mitigated streams onsite.
Specifically, along..." Remove "...all around the existing pond footprint, and within the pond
footprint..." After the third sentence (after reference to Appendix H), add the following
sentence, "The riparian areas adjacent to the newly constructed stream channel within the pond
footprint will be planted for buffer restoration credit in accordance with 15A NCAC 028 0295 (o)
and is labeled as "restoration via pond" on Table 1 and Table 6."
These revisions have been made to Section 3.2.
Section 3.2, 2nd Paragraph (Pg. 11) — Please include a reference to plan sheets S9 and S10 of
Appendix H noted in this section.
. reference to S9 and S10 of Appendix H has been included in Section 3.2.
Section 3.3, 1st Paragraph (Pg. 11) — Please include a reference to plan sheets F1 and F2 of
Appendix H in this section.
A reference to F1 and F2 of Appendix H has been included in Section 3.3.
Section 3.4, 1st Paragraph (Pg. 12) — Please include a reference to plan sheets P1 and P2 of
Appendix H in this section.
A reference to P1 and P2 of Appendix H has been included in Section 3.4.
Section 3.4, Table 5 (Pg. 12) —Add a column for Sub-Canopy vs Canopy to Table 5.
A column differentiating Sub-Canopy and Canopy of the listed species has been added to Table
5.
Section 4.1, General —This section should be customized for the buffer mitigation bank. I've
made suggestions for your consideration. I do believe there should be 13 plots since 2% of the
planted area (which I think is 16.14 acres according to Table 1), should be 13. I'm also okay
with RES using 1 of the 5 random plots for the Stream Monitoring for the Buffer Monitoring.
Therefore, instead of adding another fixed plot, I recommend 1 random.

These suggestions have been taken into consideration and revised accordingly. There will be
13 fixed vegetation plots throughout the planted area.
Section 4.1, 1st Paragraph (Pg. 13) — In the first sentence, after "Riparian vegetation
monitoring," include "...where buffer mitigation credits are being generated,". In the third
sentence, remove "As part of the stream mitigation plan," and begin that sentence with "Twelve
fixed monitoring plots..."; change 20.89, to 16.14 acres as well as changing the number of
random plots from five to one. Please remove the fourth sentence, "Those measuring success
of just the buffer areas where buffer credit is being sought, will be provided in the Monitoring
reports (the twelve fixed monitoring plots)." In the fifth sentence, be sure to specify "...The
following data will be recorded for all trees in the 12 plots..." Begin the 10th sentence with
"Desirable native volunteer species..." and remove "as determined" from the end of that same
sentence, replacing it with "upon approval."
These revisions have been made in Section 4.1.
Section 4.1, 3rd Paragraph (Pg. 13) — In the first sentence, specify "RES must monitor the
twelve fixed plots for the stream mitigation bank..." In the second sentence, add "...these
plots..." and remove "...placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation
area for buffer credits...", adding "will need to be monitored in accordance with both the
monitoring protocol in the Feed and Seed Stream Mitigation Plan and this Buffer Mitigation Plan
to ensure compliance of both plans is achieved."
These revisions have been made to Section 4.1 with the exception that we have decided to use
13 fixed plots instead of 12.
Section 5, General —The conservation easement included in Appendix C does not meet our
expectations for buffer mitigation rules. Please use the template the USACE has for combined
404/Buffer projects. This template is both in RIBITS and on the DWR Banking website.
Appendix C was updated to include the correct template.
Section 7, 1st Paragraph (Pg. 14) — Remove "...and within the pond footprint..." from the first
sentence and add "...0.56 acres (24,572.000 ft2) of buffer restoration credits adjacent to a newly
constructed stream channel within the pond footprint..."
Ihese revisions have been made to Section 7
Section 7, 2nd Paragraph (Pg. 14) — In the second sentence, change two credit ledgers to one
credit ledger and remove the beginning of the subsequent sentence, "One ledger will
account...", adding the word both before buffer restoration and removing "...one ledger will
account for..." In the fourth sentence, change "these credit ledgers" to "the credit ledger."
These revisions have been made to Section i
Section 7, General —When comparing the stream mitigation assets with the buffer assets,
there appears to be both stream and buffer credits generated for widths 0-200' from top of bank.
Please confirm that the IRT is okay with the stacking of Buffer and Stream mitigation credits
beyond widths of 50' before proceeding with tallying up your buffer mitigation credits.
i-his project will only be generating riparian buffer credits and will not be generating additional
stream credits using non-standard buffer widths. Therefore, the project will not be stacking
stream and buffer credits. A sentence will be added to the Final Stream Mitigation Plan in order
to clarify this.
3

Section 7, Table 6.(Pg. 16) — Some of these numbers do not add up when I complete the form.
Please keep in mind, that we do not work backwards from Buffer Credits to Total Area. Please
provide me the working Table 6 in an email so that I can see where the inconsistencies are.
Under the Feature Name column, change RD2 to say "RD2 Pond."
An excel file will be provided of the buffer mitigation asset table, there were some slight decimal
errors in Table 6 that have been updated.
Figure 4—The table in the bottom right corner of the figure doesn't match Table 6. Please
remove table from map. It is not needed.
fhe table has been removed from Figure 4.
Figure 9— In the Legend, add the words "Stream Mitigation" before the "Approach" sub-
heading.
The legend in r igure 9 has been revised to read "Stream Mitigation Approach."
General —Various edits were provided by DWR throughout the document regarding minor
wording, grammatical, and/or formatting errors.
All revisions have been accepted and amended throughout the document.

Final Buffer Mitigation Plan
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Project
DWR Project Number: 2018-1397 Vl
Randolph County,North
Cape Fear River Caroli
Basin: Randleman Lakena Watershed
HUC 03030003
0.b. b
mc,q rI •
M fi . Mw ` af m� : f
l A
At*
- -
K
k aiM.
F -- r; .may as ;.:, ^ a. M Da.-''''
Ii t 4 "` s
i r nr, rn - gs� '
,s '3'
`tt��.K `=ti. .bad' .'+ L; � y �{�. �..
ada4 F (, F
Prepared By:
ores
Bank Sponsor: Environmental, Banc and
Exchange (EBX)
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh NC 27612
July 2020
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 1 July 2020

Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 Parcel Location 3
1.2 Parcel Overview 3
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership 4
2 PROJECT AREA—EXISTING CONDITIONS 5
2.1 Surface Water Classification 5
2.2 Physiography and Soils 5
2.3 Wetlands 6
2.4 Existing Riparian Conditions 6
2.4.1 Existing Conditions Photos 7
2.5 Regulatory Considerations 9
2.5.1 Threatened and Endangered Species 9
2.6 Environmental and Cultural Constraints 9
2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) Floodplain/Floodway Mapping 9
3 RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN 10
3.1 Parcel Preparation 10
3.2 Riparian Restoration Activities 11
3.3 Riparian Enhancement Activities 11
3.4 Planting Plan 12
3.5 Easement Boundaries and Fencing 12
4 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 13
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria 13
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance 13
5 LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN 14
6 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 14
7 MITIGATION POTENTIAL 14
8 REFERENCES 17
Figures
Figure 1. Service Area
Figure 2. Project Vicinity
Figure 3. Existing Conditions
Figure 4. Conceptual Design Plan for Riparian Buffer Bank
Figure 5. USGS Quadrangle
Figure 6. Mapped Soils
Figure 7.National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 8. Project Constraints
Figure 9. Monitoring Plan
Appendices
Appendix AA. Buffer MBI
Appendix AB. Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 2 July 2020

1 INTRODUCTION
Environmental Banc and Exchange (EBX), a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental
Solutions(RES),is pleased to provide this Buffer Mitigation Plan(Plan)for the Feed and Seed Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Bank(Project). This Project is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River
Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03030003)
(Figure 1). This Plan is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B
.0295, the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0250 and the RES
Randleman Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation (MBI), made and
entered into by EBX acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Depailinent of
Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Plan has also been designed in
concurrence with Feed and Seed Stream Mitigation Project in the Randleman Stream and Wetland
Umbrella Mitigation Bank(SAW#2018-01637).
1.1 Parcel Location
The Feed and Seed Project is located in northern Randolph County,NC,approximately 5.6 miles southeast
of Archdale(Figure 1). The latitude and longitude for the Project is 35.883069 N and-79.856111 W.The
Parcel is located within Cape Fear River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03030003010070, a Targeted Local
Watershed,and DWR Sub-basin Number 03-06-08.
To access the Project head East on NC-62 from the Town of Archdale and turn right onto Harlow Road
and head south for approximately 3.6 miles,continue on Davis Country Road for 1.1 miles,then turn left
onto Lewis Davis Road. The project access is less than a half mile on the left(Figure 2).
1.2 Parcel Overview
The conservation easement of the Feed and Seed Project is approximately 27.58 acres and includes six
unnamed tributaries that drain into Randleman Lake. The project area is comprised of three easement
sections(Figure 3). The four reaches (RD1, RD2, RD3, and RD4)that are part of the stream mitigation
for stream credit are found within a continuous easement section that is less than a half mile from
Randleman Lake. Whereas, two of the reaches, RD5 and RD6, are separated from the main easement
segment and will only be utilized for riparian buffer credit and drain directly into Randleman Lake a couple
hundred feet away. Reach RD1 is an intermittent unnamed tributary that is the primary drainage feature
within the main easement segment of the Parcel. It is split into RD1-A (393 LF) and RD1-B (344 LF),
which flows through pasture from the western property boundary to the eastern side of the project before
entering a culvert under Lewis Davis Road.Reach RD2 is an intermittent tributary which originates at the
pond in the southeast corner of the project and flows northeast to confluence with RD1. The reach is
approximately 1,958 linear feet and exhibits extensive channelization, portions of vertical banks, and
erosion from cattle. The stream channel is within an active forested pasture bound by non-forested cattle
pasture on either side.Reach RD3 is an intermittent tributary that currently begins in the southwest corner
of the project and flows 210 linear feet north to confluence with RD2. The current reach flows through
active wooded pasture.Reach RD4 is split into RD4-A(61 LF)and RD4-B(119 LF)and is an intermittent
tributary that originates along the eastern side of the project, downstream of a headwater wetland, and
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 3 July 2020

flows north to confluence with RD2.The upper half of the channel flows through open pasture,then enters
wooded pasture through heavily impacted cattle crossing and continues to the confluence with RD2. RD5
is a 119 linear foot intermittent channel that originates onsite in one of the smaller northern segments of
the easement, flows through active open pasture, and then drains directly into Randleman Lake once
leaving the easement. RD6 is a perennial channel, that is 157 linear feet and enters the easement at the
western boundary of the very northern segment of the easement,flows through mostly non-forested pasture
until it exits the easement to drain directly into Randleman Lake. The majority of the Project is currently
actively grazed wooded and open pasture. Grazing livestock have historically had access to all stream
reaches within the Project. The lack of an understory in the riparian buffer and the long-term presence of
cattle has contributed to bank instability and erosional rills within some riparian zones. Stream
determinations and buffer viability determinations were verified by the DWR site visit on June 13,2018.
All the riparian areas were assessed by DWR during an onsite visit to determine viability for buffer
mitigation. During the site visit and noted in the letter dated August 2,2018,all reaches were confirmed to
have a cattle access. Correspondence regarding this determination is in Appendix E.
The goal of the Project is to restore and enhance ecological function to the existing streams and their
associated riparian buffers by establishing appropriate plant communities while minimizing temporal and
land disturbing impacts in the Randleman Lake Watershed. Restoration and enhancement of the
Randleman Lake riparian buffer(as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0250)is anticipated to result in a reduction
of the water quality stressors currently affecting the Project:livestock access and areas of minimal riparian
buffer. Immediate water quality benefits and pollutant removal within the vicinity of the Project will
include the exclusion of livestock access to streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land-
uses.This Project is consistent with the management strategy for maintaining and protecting riparian areas
in the Randleman Lake watershed.
Of the total 27.58 acres in conservation easement,the Feed and Seed Riparian Buffer Project presents the
opportunity to perform 1,101,810 ft2 (25.29 acres) of riparian buffer mitigation (before applying credit
ratios) by establishing or enhancing a native hardwood forest and herbaceous riparian buffer plant
community with a minimum width of 50 feet and a maximum of 200 feet from the top of bank of the stream
channels. Table 1 provides an overall summary of the total buffer mitigation credits.
Table 1. Feed and Seed Mitigation Project Mitigation Summary
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits
Mitigation Totals Used Area Square Feet and Acres i Credits
Restoration 678,450 ft2(15.58 acres) 424,563.605
Restoration via Pond* 24,572 ft2(0.56 acres) 24,572.000
Enhancement via cattle exclusion 398,788 ft2(9.15 acres) 167,648.967
Total Ri,arian Buffer 1,101,8810 ft2(25.30 acres) 616,784.572
*Only viable for buffer credit if stream restoration is performed through the pond bottom
Figure 4 shows the Conceptual Design for Riparian Buffer Bank Map and Section 3 provides details
of the mitigation determination on the Feed and Seed Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project.
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership
The land required for the construction,management,and stewardship of this Project includes three parcels
in Randolph County with the following ownership in Table 2.Once finalized,a copy of the land protection
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 4 July 2020

instrument will be included in Appendix C. Once recorded, the secured easements will allow EBX to
proceed with the Project development and protect the mitigation assets in perpetuity. The Wilmington
District Conservation Easement model template will be utilized to draft the site protection instrument.
Table 2. Pro'ect Parcel and Landowner Information
PIN
Owner of Record Or Stream ReachII
Tax Parcel ID#
7747665722
Ryan S.Davis,Sr.and Toni O.Davis 7747565971 All Stream Reaches
7747789806
2 PROJECT AREA—EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 Surface Water Classification
Although these tributaries are not classified,they drain to the Randleman Lake, which has been assigned
as Water Supply IV (WS-IV) and CA: * (NCDEQ 2017). Water Supply IV (WS-IV) waters are used as
sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS-I, II or III
classification is not feasible.These waters are also protected for Class C uses.WS-IV waters are generally
in moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Areas (NCDWQ 2011). It also has been
designated as a Critical Area within a designated Critical Supply Watershed that is subject to a special
management strategy specified in 15A NCAC 2B .0248.
2.2 Physiography and Soils
The Project is located in the Southern Outer Piedmont level IV ecoregion within the Piedmont level III
ecoregion. With lower elevations and less relief compared to other areas of the Piedmont,the landforms
of this ecoregion consist of irregular,rolling plains. The geologic composition of the region is red,clayey
subsoils underlain by deep saprolite and gneiss, schist, and granite bedrock. Interspersed throughout the
region are also areas of diabase, diorite, or gabbro bedrock that form alkaline soils. Natural vegetation
communities consist of mixed oak forests,while historic land use trends have promoted the establishment
of loblolly and shortleaf pine forests(USEPA 2002).The topography of the project area is generally rolling
with elevations ranging from 750 to 800 feet above mean sea level (NAD 27) based upon USGS
topographic mapping(Figure 5).
The NRCS Web Soil Survey and Randolph County Soil Survey(NRCS,2006)depicts three mapping units
across the project (Table 3). The map units are Mecklenburg clay loam, two to eight percent slopes,
moderately eroded and Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex, eight to 15 percent slopes. The soil
characteristics of these map units are summarized in Figure 6.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 5 July 2020

Table 3. Parcel Mapped Soil Series
Map FPercent Drainage Hydrologic Landscape
Unit Map Unit Nam Hydric Class Soil Group Setting
Symbol `
Mecklenburg clay loam,
MeB2 2 to 8 percent slopes, 0% Well Drained C Summits
moderatel eroded
Wilkes-Poindexter-
WpC Wynott complex, 8 to 0% Well Drained C/D Backslopes on ridges
15 Iercent sloes
2.3 Wetlands
A detailed wetland delineation was performed August 12t'`, 2019. Wetland boundaries were delineated
using current methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Soils were characterized and classified using the
Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0 (NRCS, 2010). A preliminary
jurisdictional determination (PJD) request was sent to the USACE on August 29, 2019. Per USACE
correspondence found in Appendix D,the USACE concurs with the JD submittal and an approval will be
completed in conjunction with the bank approval.Wetland forms are included in Appendix D.The stream
channels were classified using NC DWR methodology (Figure 3) and were verified by NCDWR onsite
June 13,2018(Appendix E).Within the boundaries of the proposed Project,eight jurisdictional wetlands
are present in and adjacent to the Project(Appendix D,Figure 3). Wetlands are labeled as WA(Wetland
A)through to WH(Wetland H)(Figure 3).
The USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) depicts two wetlands within the project limits. In
the southeast corner of the project area there is a small area of PSS1Ah (Palustrine, Scrub-Shrub,Broad-
Leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded) that is found within the pond footprint and a linear wetland
mapped as PFO1A(Freshwater Forested/Shrub wetland)along RD6 (Figure 7).
2.4 Existing Riparian Conditions
Current land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily actively grazed pasture and forested pasture.
The site viability letter from DWR in Appendix E provides details on land-uses within the Project riparian
areas. Current conditions demonstrate significant habitat degradation as a result of impacts from
agriculture,livestock in particular,and historic land uses(Figure 8).Historic aerial imagery indicates that
the southern portion of the Project and adjacent land has been used extensively for agricultural purposes
since at least 1948. The northern two easement segments of the project remained mostly in wooded areas
with the exception of a small pasture area between RD6 and RD5 and were not as severely impacted by
agricultural use until the mid-1990's. Currently, the northern portion of the project remains partially in
agricultural use and is being used for pasture land.Much of the areas adjacent to the project streams have
been allowed to maintain shade trees but continue to have cattle access and are densely vegetated with
stiltgrass. The southern of portion of the easement is forested and pastureland and has remained this way
since before the 1940's. The farm pond at the southernmost end of the project was likely constructed
sometime after 1948 and doesn't appear to have been altered since.Each reach has livestock access and is
actively grazed. Since the DWR site visit on June 13, 2018, the land use and condition of the riparian
buffer has remained the same. Forested riparian areas have been intermittently cattle-grazed and lack a
well-developed understory and shrub strata which is dominated by invasive Japanese stiltgrass
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 6 July 2020

(Microstegium vimineum). The riparian areas most closely resemble a disturbed piedmont alluvial forest
and included tulip-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak (Quercus alba), American holly (Ilex
opaca), elm(Ulmus alata), sweet gum(Liquidambar styrac flua), sugar hackberry(Celtis laeviata),river
birch (Betula nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), and American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana). Sub-
canopy species included sweetbay(Magnolia virginiana),blackberry(Rubus argutus),highbush blueberry
(Vaccinium corybosum), black elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax
rotundifolia). The pasture areas were dominated by pasture grasses with the presence of other herbaceous
species like fescue grass (Festuca sp.), common milkweed (Asclepiads syriaca), dogfennel (Eupatorium
capifollium), asters (Symphyotrichum sp.), and American pokeweed (Phytolacca americana). Invasive
species are also present throughout, including Japanese stiltgrass, multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) and
Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense).
The riparian buffer along the northern two segments of the easement (RD5 and RD6) are mostly non-
forested pasture grazed by cattle with a narrow strip of forest near the easement boundary.Within the main
easement segment, majority of the left bank of RD2 (starting at the RD3 origin) and ending at the right
bank of RD1 is forested pastureland. The farm pond at the top of RD2 is non-forested pasture that is
heavily utilized by cattle. There is a strip of forested pasture on the right bank of RD2 starting at the
confluence with RD3,but gradually it becomes non-forested,maintained vegetation further downstream.
The buffer along RD4 is mostly non-forested pasture as well. In general,the riparian buffer of the project
is in poor condition. Current buffer conditions demonstrate significant degradation with a loss of
stabilizing vegetation because of continued cattle access and past land management actions. Throughout
the Project area there are scattered invasives that will be treated to the extent practicable.
2.4.1 Existing Conditions Photos
544
-
RD1 Floodplain Buffer Condition Along RD2
June 20,2019 June 20,2019
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 7 July 2020

'AY' i :s. _ „tea a—; ! ,
s w7Vz;'`z''^"arv.S $. ! .'C _ •
w t '/h�
VR.;` " is i
�.." '
`� yam 4 �
June ,
[_ 'k RD
June2R/ D
20230C9
ti
nfluence@s f?;; �
f RD4Buffer o -202019
•
r, i i . —
RD2 Channel Pond
June 20,2019 June 20,2019
•
c 5 ,A. d ••A.A
•
,3,vvs.1.,v,ipt
d^ .i it ji I ! il 4�. rA`T R V,j Y :i�)�3
`, z - { ^,, ate ' as
fi (y�j,
1.. 1,- t P
RD5 Ripariai Buffer Riparian Buffer of RD6
January 14,2020 January 14,2020
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 8 July 2020

2.5 Regulatory Considerations
2.5.1 Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under provisions
of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,as amended.The US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) database (updated 26 March 2018) lists the Schweinitz's sunflower(Helianthus schweinitzii)
as an endangered species in Randolph County, North Carolina (Table 4). The Bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA) and prohibits take
of bald and golden eagles. No protected species or potential habitat for protected species was observed
during preliminary site evaluations. A survey was complete, on August 20,2019 for the Schweinitz's
sunflower but no species or habitat was found.
In addition to the USFWS database,the NC Natural Heritage Program(NHP)GIS database was consulted
to determine whether previously cataloged occurrences of protected species are mapped within one mile
of the project. Results from NHP indicated that there are no known occurrences within a one-mile radius
of the project area.A letter from the USFWS dated March 29,2019 indicated that minimal adverse impacts
to fish and wildlife resources are expected as part of the project.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species in Randolph County
Common Nam cientific na Federal Habitat Record
Status Present Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA No Current
Vascular Plant:
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii E No Current
E=Endangered;BGPA=Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
2.6 Environmental and Cultural Constraints
Environmental and cultural resources include historic and archeological resources located in or near the
project parcel. RES evaluated whether the existing and future conditions of cultural resources near the
project area would have the potential to be impacted by the project. On August 11, 2017, the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)website (http://gis.ncdcr.gov)database was reviewed
to determine if any listed or potentially eligible historic or archeological resources in the proposed Feed
and Seed Site existed.This search did not reveal any occurrence within the project area.The Blair-Anthony
House (RD0162) and the William Coletrane House (RD0029) are located within 0.5 mile of the project
area. The Feed and Seed Project will not threaten or impact these historic locations. A letter from SHPO
dated April 4, 2019 stated that no known historic resources would be affected by the project.
Documentation is included in Appendix B.
2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)Floodplain/Floodway Mapping
The Project is not within a mapped FEMA Regulatory Floodway or 100-year floodplain(Figure 8).While
designing the Feed and Seed Project,appropriate measures were taken to eliminate hydrologic trespass of
the adjacent land. The adjacent land use will not be affected by the proposed design, and no detrimental
impacts are expected beyond the easement limits.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 9 July 2020

3 RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN
The goal of the Project is to restore ecological function to the existing stream and riparian buffer by
establishing appropriate stream buffer plant communities where absent and enhancing buffers where
minimal vegetation exists, excluding cattle access throughout the project area, as well as to protect these
buffers and stream function into perpetuity.
Riparian restoration and enhancement adjacent to streams are shown in Figure 4,and were determined as
viable mitigation activities by the DWR in their letter dated August 2,2018(Appendix E).All restoration
and enhancement activities will begin from the tops of the proposed stream banks and extend a minimum
of 50 feet from the stream outward to a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the stream channel where
possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015). In forested areas on this site,
the buffer restoration areas are determined based on whether there are less than 25 percent of the tree
canopy cover and a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems (i.e. shrubs or saplings) in accordance
with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)(12). The buffer enhancement
areas on this site are determined based on how long term and current presence of cattle and assessed in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6).
3.1 Parcel Preparation
Preparation within the Parcel will involve excluding livestock from the project area, spraying undesired
fescue grass and exotic invasive species; contoured ripping, seeding and planting, and pond removal.
Livestock will be completely removed from the Parcel, in perpetuity, by way of conservation easement
and installation of livestock exclusion fencing. Prior to construction a Pre-construction Notification for
the Nationwide Permit 27, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and a DWR 401 Water Quality
Certification,under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act,will be obtained. Following the issuance of the
Nationwide Permit,an erosion and sediment control permit will be obtained. Preparation of the pond will
begin a minimum of six months before the rest of the project construction begins. Stabilization and
implementation of dispersal techniques will be utilized where surface flows have become concentrated to
minimize the chances of non-diffuse flow. A combination of silt fencing, erosion control wattles,
temporary seeding,and erosion control matting will be used to reduce erosion and stabilize soil in riparian
areas during any land disturbance activities. These erosion control measures shall be inspected and
properly maintained at the end of each working day to ensure measures are functioning properly until
permanent vegetation is established.
Immediately following completion of restoration activities, disturbed areas will be stabilized to prevent
erosion by seeding with a mixture of temporary and permanent seed mix within ten working days upon
completion of final grading. The seed mixture of riparian seeding will also be applied and established
where bare areas are present due to impacts from cattle. The proposed seed mix can be found in sections
P1 and P2 of the design Plan Set, found within Appendix H of the mitigation plan. Areas of compacted
soils will be ripped and disked prior to seed mix application and tree planting. Temporary and permanent
riparian seeding shall be done in accordance with the erosion control plan. Soil amendments will be
provided as needed based on the results of soil fertility tests. After construction activities,the subsoil will
be scarified, and any compaction will be deep tilled before the topsoil is placed back over the site. Any
topsoil that is removed during construction will be stockpiled and placed over the site during final soil
preparation. This process should provide favorable soil conditions for plant growth.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 10 July 2020

All riparian restoration and enhancement activities will commence in concurrence with the stream
mitigation activities and not before. Therefore, the mitigation area where riparian restoration is being
performed may be altered slightly depending on the approval of the Stream Mitigation Plan for the Stream
Mitigation Bank. The riparian restoration areas will be surveyed,and information will be provided in the
As-Built report.
3.2 Riparian Restoration Activities
Riparian restoration is proposed within the riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas of the mitigated
streams onsite. Specifically along the left bank of RD1-A and B, the outer limits of the riparian buffer
along RD3, along the outer limits of RD2, RD4, RD5, and RD6 in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)(Figure 4). The pond at the top of RD2 is proposed for
stream restoration which will restore and daylight the connection between the pond and downstream. The
stream design approach will include breaching the existing dam and meandering the proposed channel
within the natural valley (Appendix H). The riparian areas adjacent to the newly constructed stream
channel within the pond footprint will be planted for buffer restoration credit in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B 0295 (o)and is labeled as"restoration via pond"on Table 1 and Table 6. Riparian restoration
areas will be planted from top of bank to at least 50 feet from all mitigated streams with bare root tree
seedlings on a nine by six-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of at least 680 trees per acre. Planting
will consist of a composition of native bare-root tree species specified in Section 3.4. The restoration of
plant communities within the Project will not only provide stabilization and improve water quality within
the easement limits but will also provide ecological benefits to the entire watershed. Some areas adjacent
to the forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red
maple and sweetgum.Furthermore,RES will install cattle exclusion fencing to exclude access to riparian
areas and their associated streams.All fencing will be installed to NRCS specifications.
As mentioned in the Stream Mitigation Plan for the Feed and Seed Project,some other restoration activities
of the stream will include debris removal from the channel, culvert removal along RD2, an offline
restoration approach for reaches RD1-A, RD2, RD3, and sections of RD4-B which includes meandering
the proposed channels within the natural valley and stabilizing stream banks using a combination of
grading, erosion control matting, livestake planting, native material revetment techniques (i.e.
bioengineering),structure placement,and sod transplants where possible.These activities will also include
backfilling sections of abandoned stream channels to the elevation of the floodplain and installing channel
plugs where necessary. There will also be areas of localized bank stabilization on tributaries that will
receive stream enhancement treatment like RD1-B and RD4-B. Additionally a RD5 and RD6 will have
localized areas of bank stabilization via grading, matting, livestaking or seeding, debris removal, along
with planting activities(Appendix H, S9 & S10).
3.3 Riparian Enhancement Activities
Riparian enhancement is proposed along the right riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas of the lower
end of RD1,along RD3,most parts of RD2,and on the uppermost part of RD6.These activities will occur
in areas of grazing adjacent to the mitigated streams in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)(Figure 4).RES will install cattle exclusion fencing to exclude access
to riparian areas and their associated streams along the entire easement (Appendix H, F1 & F2). All
fencing will be installed to NRCS specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 11 July 2020

maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple and sweetgum. Minimal
maintenance is anticipated due to the past land use history.
3.4 Planting Plan
All riparian restoration areas will be planted from top of bank back at least 50-feet from the mitigated
streams with bare root tree seedlings on nine by six-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees
per acre.Bare root plantings and live stakes shall be planted according to the planting plan(Appendix H,
P1 & P2). Planting of the Project where riparian buffer restoration is being performed will meet the
performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295. The vegetation data will be collected
no earlier than late August of each year. This includes treating invasive species and planting at least four
species of native hardwood bare root trees.A Piedmont Alluvial Forest will be the target community type
and will be used for all areas within the project.The community is defined by Schafale (2012). The initial
planting of bare root trees will occur after construction is complete and between November 15 and March
15 of that year. Wherever possible,mature vegetation will be preserved and incorporated into the buffer.
Tree species specified for planting on the Feed and Seed Project are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Feed and Seed Project Tree Planting List
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
Sub-Canopy %of Total
Species Common Name Spacing(ft) Unit Type Species
vs Canopy
Composition
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore 9x6 Bare root Canopy 20
Betula nigra River birch 9x6 Bare root Canopy 15
Quercus phellos Willow oak 9x6 Bare root Canopy 15
Cercis canadensis Eastern red bud 9x6 Bare root Sub-Canopy 10
Quercus alba White oak 9x6 Bare root Canopy 10
Quercus rubra Northern red oak 9x6 Bare root Canopy 10
Quercus shumardii Shumard oak 9x6 Bare root Canopy 10
Cornus florida Flowering dogwood 9x6 Bare root Sub-Canopy 10
■ Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species
r Species Common Name Sub-Canopy %of Total Species Comp
vs Canopy
Salix nigra Black willow Canopy 40
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Sub-Canopy 30
Populus deltoides Eastern cottonwood Canopy 30
3.5 Easement Boundaries and Fencing
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by cattle fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or
other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement.Boundaries will be marked with
signs identifying the property as a mitigation site and will include the name of the long-term steward and
a contact number. Boundary markers will be installed with the contact information of the long-term
steward before the submittal of the As-Built report. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed
will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 12 July 2020

as part of monitoring activities and the conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported
in the annual monitoring reports to DWR.
4 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria
Riparian vegetation monitoring where buffer mitigation credits are being generated will be based on the
"CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation: Level 2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2". Annual
vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five (5)years and will be conducted during
the fall season with the first year occurring at least 6 months from initial planting. Thirteen fixed
monitoring plots will be installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size in the planted buffer mitigation area(16.14
ac) and will cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area for the Buffer Mitigation Bank
(Figure 9). The following data will be recorded for all trees in the 13 fixed plots: species,common name,
height,planting date(or volunteer),and grid location.All stems in plots will be flagged with flagging tape.
Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports.Visual
inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant.
The measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of at least four native hardwood
tree species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 stems
per acre at the end of Year 5.Desirable native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance
standards upon approval by DWR. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that
none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement will also
be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• no encroachment has occurred;
• diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area;and
• there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
RES must monitor the thirteen fixed plots for the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years,
or until IRT approval. Therefore, these plots will need to be monitored in accordance with both the
monitoring protocol in the Feed and Seed Stream Mitigation Plan and this Buffer Mitigation Plan to ensure
compliance of both plans is achieved.
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance
Adaptive measures will be developed,or appropriate remedial actions taken if in the event that the site,or
a specific component of the site, fails to achieve the defined success criteria. Remedial actions will be
designed to achieve the success criteria specified in this Plan,and will include identification of the causes
of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring criteria that will take into account
physical and climatic conditions.
Initial plant maintenance may include a one-time mowing,prior to initial planting to remove undesirable
species.If mowing is deemed necessary by RES during the monitoring period,RES must receive approval
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 13 July 2020

by the DWR prior to any mowing activities to ensure that no buffer violations have been performed.
Failure to receive approval to mow within the Randleman Lake buffer, as defined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0233, by the DWR could result in Randleman Lake buffer violations and violations of the conservation
easement. If necessary,RES will develop a species-specific control plan.
5 LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
EBX, acting as the Bank Sponsor, will record a Conservation Easement with the Randolph County
Register of Deeds Office for this site. The Conservation Easement will be assigned to Unique Places To
Save(UP2S). All monitoring activities,including periodic inspections of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the Conservation Easement are upheld, are the responsibility of EBX until the Project is
transferred to the UP2S.Endowment funds required to uphold the Feed and Seed Bank Parcel conservation
easement in perpetuity shall be negotiated prior to site transfer to the UP2S.
The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the Conservation Easement has allowed for the implementation of an
initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and conducted by the Bank
Sponsor. The Conservation Easement will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary, maintenance of
the Parcel during the initial monitoring phase. These activities will be conducted in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the RES Feed and Seed Riparian Buffer MBI made and entered into by EBXand
DWR.
6 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of Performance Bonds sufficient to assure one
hundred percent (100%) completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any
remedial work required. Financial assurances will be payable at the direction of the DWR to its designee
or to a standby trust.Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the DWR in the event of default
by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable. The initial performance bond will be in the amount of at least
$150,000 and shall be able to cover 100% of the costs associated with construction of the riparian
restoration areas. The monitoring bond shall be in the amount of at least $100,000 and shall be able to
cover 100% of the costs associated with the monitoring and maintenance of the riparian restoration areas
for five years.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed to cover the next years monitoring period, with
confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR
reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of
bond renewals when applicable.
7 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
This Project has the potential to generate approximately 9.75 acres (424,858.385 ft2) of riparian buffer
restoration credits on existing non-forested pasture,0.56 acres(24,572.000 ft2)of buffer restoration credits
adjacent to a newly constructed stream channel within the pond footprint,and 3.85 acres(167,648.720 ft2)
of buffer enhancement via cattle exclusion credits.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 14 July 2020

The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated will service the Randleman Lake Watershed buffer
impacts. The Sponsor will maintain one credit ledger for both buffer Restoration credits and buffer
Enhancement credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on the credit ledger. The total potential
mitigation credits that the Feed and Seed Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project will generate are summarized
in Table 6; Figure 4.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 15 July 2020

Table 6. Feed and Seed Bank Parcel Credit Summary
Subjec . 11
Initial Final
Min-Max % Riparian
Credit (enter NO if Feature Mitigation Feature Total Creditable Credit Full Credit
Location Buffer Buffer
Type ephemeral Type Activity Name Area(A) Area(si) Ratio Credit Ratio
or ditch 1) Width(ft) (x 1) (x 1) Credits
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration via 0-100' RD2 Pond 24,572 24,572 1 100% 1.00000 24,572.000
Pond
RD1-A,
RD1-B,
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100' RD2,RD3, 299,515 299,515 1 100% 1.00000 299,515.000
RD4-A,
RD5,RD6
RD1-A,
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enhancement via 0-100' RD2,RD3, 304,027 304,027 2 100% 2.00000 152,013.500
Cattle Exclusion RD4-B
RD6
RD1-A,
RD1-B,
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200' RD2,RD3, 378,935 378,935 1 33% 3.03030 125,048.675
RD4-A,
RDS,RD6
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enhancement via 101-200' RD1 A' 94,762 94,762 2 33% 3.03030 15,635.720
Cattle Exclusion RD2,RD3
TOTAL 1,101,810 616,784.895
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 16 July 2020

8 REFERENCES
Endangered Species Act of 1973. Public Law 93-205, 87 Stat. 884. 16 USC 1531-1543,
Environmental Laboratory.(1987). "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,"Technical Report
Y-87-1,U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg,MS
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2007. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. North
Carolina
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934. Public Law 85-72, 79 Stat. 216. 16 USC 661-667(d).
Lee, T.L, Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., and Wentworth, T.R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation,Version 4.2.http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-2.pdf.
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended Section 106). 16 USC 470. 36 CFR 800,23 CFR
771, 36 CFR 60, 36 CFR 63.
NCDENR.2010."N.C.Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 4.1."N.C.Wetland Functional
Assessment Team.
North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality(NCDEQ). 2019.North Carolina Water Bodies Listed
by River Basin.
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e 125ad7628f494694e259c8
0dd64265;accessed April 2019.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services(NCDMS)."Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities
2009."
NCDWQ (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2011. A Guide to Surface Freshwater
Classifications in North Carolina. Raleigh. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/
get_file?p_1_id=1169848&folderld=2209568&name=DLFE-35732.pdf; accessed December 2018.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program(NCNHP). 2018.Natural Heritage Element Occurrences.April
2019.
NCSHPO (North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office). 2019. North Carolina Listings in the
National Register of Historic Places. http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/NR-PDFs.pdf; accessed April
2019.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
2006.Soil Survey of Randolph County,North Carolina.
USDA-NRCS. 2014. Web Soil Survey GIS Data.
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm;accessed April 2019.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 17 July 2020

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina. April
2019
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. EPA Manual. Quantifying Physical
Habitat in Wadeable Streams.
USFWS(United States Fish and Wildlife Service).2015.Information,Planning,and Conservation(IPAC)
Online Screening Tool. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/;accessed April 2019.
Schafale,M.P.2012.Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh,
NC.
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region(Version 2.0),ed. J. S. Wakeley,R. W.
Lichvar,and C. V.Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg,MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Plan
Riparian Buffer Project 18 July 2020

Figures
Figure 1. Service Area
Figure 2. Project Vicinity
Figure 3. Existing Conditions
Figure 4. Conceptual Design Plan for Riparian Buffer Bank
Figure 5. USGS Quadrangle
Figure 6. Mapped Soils
Figure 7. National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 8. Project Constraints
Figure 9. Monitoring Plan

V
Brook Cove Monroeton
bs Williamsburg
aa 65 65
nanton ® 0Fulp C3 C3
Iv
Belews Creek 65
Stokesdale
® O 150 Browns Monticello
Summerfield Summit
Pine Knolls C3 l so
Walkertown CID 0Oak Ridge W
O U
66
Piedmont
150 Triad
13 International KVf((ji`'�`��t)
Guthrie Kemers• Airport �,
711 Willowbend • :x 9 JosepnMBry.gej
lalem McLeansville Gibsonville
m
no C 70
® Greensboro
Sedalia .lh;• ,,,,
I 0Union Cross 1.0
. 0 U
® VI w m CEP
Horneyto .
Wallburg O
ba
i Gum Tree lamestov^
Feed and Seed
Mitigation Project
1D
Pleasant 67,i
Midway Hi 'Dint Garden
K+mesc. •
TV
® tD 1. )
@Climax MI
Julian
P lkiliiy
Level ross
la Thomasville cm
109 Gle . .
w .
_ m Liberty
ul
es
��;;tt So•• .
co
CJ Randlema Grays Chapel
o O
Acres /V diJ
49
C3i® Staley
ba
I-+edrek Grove
(I) g, ® Cedar Falls
C3 Franklinville e
Silver Valley e Ramseur
C3
Silver Hill Asheboro Parks
ai Crossroad::
CI 42
49
220 ice.,..
Legend O
Proposed Easement Farmer
'69Utah Coleridge
Randleman Lake Service Area
Figure 1 -Service Area Date: 3/12/2020
Of�� ♦idlit ri 1 -F Drawn b GDS
+:':gnev.�lliv4 ww Feed and Seed y res
"'412101 Mitigation Project Checked by:MDE
11 1 inch=5 miles
o Miles
Randolph County, North Carolina

,a Mike's Metal e aL Letters&Welding
A.
Harbor Ln
a
N`
tV
J
a'"
Ur
Foster View Or
Beeson's
Rhododendron Nursery
steed R;,
Steed R,,
Oean View Dr ,
b a
QD Steed Rd s�� 6A
2 2 Steed Rd
-03
12 CT
'i
li
CO,,,
2
P6
1 d
N•
n9d Erd �O
01.
2
Po
`:via Feed v
4
,. Davis Coun'
'
0,m Rd u
3 c
<�
116'Co0nryRv
n
e' a
O s weo°°
sd
m
Legend
P-ggroposed Easement o
y vza
HUC: 03030003010070
N Figure 2-Project Vicinity Date: 3/12/2020
Ori' •.— ■In,j1�„ ar w �_F Drawn by: GDS
_.,,;•; 4;,�".1.,�,�� �t_ Feed and Seed res
"`�`'�' Mitigation Project
+�fj` 0 500 1.00011
Checked by: MDE
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet

' I / '.r,,,.
-- -.1.04-, ,r. k. .
. „„.0*... ..., , ..
., „L. :r:,....,,,..z.::.,-,...-644.1 ..d..,..,. .,...., .. _...,, _ ,. .;.,1, :, , :,.. ..-,,
...:.. _ ,..x -4A„!,,z'vnl ,, r_ - w• ..,...4-- -t.i;',-410P-s--,r, ,. ': liCer'41 'r ,;741°.It"' ' '
::1':41';tr1111," *.-.Ve'- A ..4.. .4., A'''.-
� `'t,3r�' r�^ gat 1 0'. �1�:- t {.. 404011 ,
1
Wriii:77.,- 7-.-. 1: -44.
, ....___............r.
4'r , ,,,—f-z-h:' 'tiliv, „:1. t' .
lopmr. -,...,tip. ,. .,, „*.:41,,,,awii.,.,.--4.„.„:„.411/,,, -- - .
4 s iM'
a y
of, ,, .. 1, ,
¢'d''' -- - Ford
S
. i •%. � : v 0 .., Crossing
' '.'1'1.2, ' :: ,''„,,-,.4 V 0
1 A r
` Powerline
,I.
#00,
r::\ 11,r , , AIX • .— , ED/ ,
. IN'
44
Pasture '0)9
PasturE �-
,, I .. • &de°It"'.114q14A- '4:
y RD2i,, 4 ! F ..
:7_,, _ 071 i.,,,.,‘„,„,,-
r
Legend 'Vrilii ,
^,
Proposed Easement '-
Davis Farm In t. , rA.; ,
//� Existing Wetland
Project Parcel ,, p
-- el**
Parcels ; ,>,II\
Pond , ,-
-Al -ram p,.
Stream Determination o ., r- `�',8 +i�`
Perennial
Rd «
Intermittent -• _ .,,'y fi
T PowerlineApproxil!, ..``
Stream Origin -� �°
N Figure 3-Existing Conditions Date: 3/12/2020
1
ores
1 ri' •. :fin v,;4:7: ::ke:Y:DDE
0 300 600
I
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

r.
• '• . ; - Bank stabilization
• , i. ,
r• -,F , Debris removal .It A* •
r.
J4• - - .h. • , •. - •
1' IW'
t ` Am
4� , :�. - d. '�..., s, L Bank and
�� •L _), , ,•a-,"";Ty 1.. ; %• + headcut stabilization r
•
Y` Remove Debris ' i"8....
� �. - '
,,\
tilli.. p ' /
l•I'iVt,v-.'._11$P4-•' o o*w,
cat i-B\411\ '
; s
?,;fv '` Remove ' ti, /
'1= ► 1 ; Old Fence m :,
+ r£`e / m°, Remove Debris ' a; •
Ilik • • -
/ /
X -2.
' t y�fi�; L 'it.
A/ ✓ Remove Culvert •
Ail
1 .� `' Landowner to Fill Hole .4
' , i ... ,.. .6! p ' - //// and Cover with Topsoil '
It's
1:,.1..4,.. ♦- _ _ — *_a• 44,, '..mot,..... -
t 411.i
i
Legend ^ (k.4, * '
Proposed Easement(27.58 ac) '.‘' _-
X X Proposed Fenceline _ •
Proposed Stream TOB _ '4 '
I • i.
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Approach • _ `
Y Y Restoration (Pond Footprint), 0-100' 1
Restoration, 0-100'
Y •'
irr_
Enhancement, 0-100'
=._
Restoration, 101-200' §
._
F .7Enhancement, 101-200" ',,
•t,
N Figure 4-Conceptual Design Plan Date: 6/25/2020
�_����������`"� w E For Riparian Buffer Bank
+a ittial IU♦j�wa : bDE
Feed and Seeddna vela 0 300 600 Mitigation Project hec
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

_7 - .--5,4:k, pi . .
r� RAN�OLPH C:u_f r
— — . I,
I/ ''.
/ �> SSE �i ``
/ .
�' ��g „, .:
� "
i.,......Air______A _.............:....O., ,;_.... ..7 ,1,_______.1_,-,...._:'e_ i_ ,-..,-,:,. • . : 0, - •.' _i %b.., ,.., . . -
i- :49.Mik . ,\ '':,‘ , - ' -r• -.=.- ....' r. 7 -11.\21 -1',...;T' • --/f.'.: _,.-_, 7- -,1_/,'.‘,„. ..,-,47.1‘11 - -i.(:);.-' ,_ ,- ....
.. ,_. .
r , :. ., .
, , . ./.. , ,.....
. . 4... _, ..•,.._,,_ , .,.:,./.,,.... . ...
ta. ..._
g,,,, � . ..
!. .., . . : . .„.._.... ,, . ... , .....,.....,,, . ...
_ __....:, .4,-,/,,,,
11
.. ‘ •, •
,•,, ,.:,_... _ .
11 cik \ , J.., __ , „ ..., .,., e_/ 7.." ,.
• .i„..,,,___,,,'..,.467; ,::.,. ' '''Or'11.'-' '''.-..--'''•,—7'1'- -.0:„.._,:,&:! ... IN
178 ac
j .7„,...,>.-
u �
„ 0 ir ...•-•.„, i.,, . • . ... /„....=__,----___
, 4"tr - 4ac ii° ,'�, ,'
���i:IL* ,,_.,
Cedar S-QUACc . . _
.1. .. A . .- .- ..-,
, ,L
1 ,__ ff.„\,,
,, ,,,. '-•:,,-,-H'i-r:' ' -------,,:----7-:----44-----,--------- _ -,_.. --..--,;
.- .44)..„,:::::-:, .. . . . :-, „
. . . ,„...„,
.., \ . . . • . . ..„ • .
•
p,j _cc
RD4 , ,, , .
J°
i iti
�++ •• RD3 15ac . _ .ile
J ;. ,:..) •
7 ac • nr�
ht„
i--\,1 ', • r�. RD2 °
f �i o r' ( 73ac t
Legend . , ._: J
-'-- g --.-- - ,,j
Proposed Easement .. _ �l `.;
�_ Drainage Areas � , Jp5
; �1 0 \''sc �1
N Figure 5-USGS Quadrangle Date: 3/12/2020
�� �`_ Pleasant Garden (1983)
ri• .„7.„ .,,,,,... ••� ��...,0� w e Drawn by: GDS � �
''','IiAL,iw•1* Feed and Seed
�r;ablovvils` 0 1,000 2,000 Mitigation Project0
Checked by: JRM
Feet Randol•h Count North Carolina 1 inch=2,000 feet

___
I,,_1),
I ,,
MeB2 PI)
McB2 . INi
tED
,:z ;
.4...s_
VD
ft-- _ • ,,•
13�" ... -, ,, .
1
,,,.,,,. .., ...4,.,,4,__ _
11
i(-----: .
.0.,...„ .. .;, •
. WzB
'' 5 tar
.. ..---- ---) i D i1 1
MD
- - . aMeB2 Trf
Legend
Proposed Easement "�`t V •
-
M Hydric (100%)
og Predominantly Hydric (66-99%) _ /
- Partially Hydric (33-65%) 1 � c
Predominantly Nonhydric (1-32%) Map unit symbol Map unit name
MeB2 Mecklenburg clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
Nonhydric (0%)
� WpC Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynottcomplex,8 to 15 percent slopes
N Figure 6-Mapped Soils Date: 3/12/2020
gz
�� �`_ (NRCS February 2020)
r' �17 Nowl ili w e Drawn by: GDS res
'''`'''A'"'"' Feed and Seed
Checked by: MDE
- .. 0 300 600 Mitigation Project
PFeet Randol•h Count North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

-.iv x �.�.. Mir' •� N1 b + :
♦T ; " i• I--''0 s ti! , fr" . ► }* 'gi g;, till'' ". ,
ki,.; * . 6•ti�i..r'�M PFO1A % '
., .w, /-
y tiei,......., , .. • .+ ` ,r
PUBHh PAB4Hh . ', NU..
.- ' r� .. f
PUBHh 6. :. ,.
�`.r rt ;i r M �►
-•
• 40 • g.ttio44
.," 'I. zit a' V s t
.V*S {o-
r. • 'htt:+ h' P $r IN•
,' 0
_ r,. y .
.• PSS1Ah•11 M _ `.
ii...... \ 4,d-A
1
• ' I. r.
,• T
r� c'""*"
-r
Legend '— •
Proposed Easement
Q ,2=941
M NW Wetlands(USFWS 10/15/2018) Ir �c,�,� '
" Figure 7-National Wetlands Date: 3/12/2020
�� �`_ Inventory
go /3f 4
1,4.111011
wt
tt
• . '"-----$. . 17‘\$
44
..
.....s. r
il
144.- IC
I Pee
%
ri' L17 :;ni.1;. •f W e Drawn by: GDS rs
,,
Feed and Seed
�fj` 0 300 600 Mitigation Project Checked by. MDE
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

1
Von ..1',k'Iii -, ,:tf'*-- I :"Nif A/=. sA*
i yp
�� I
v = _
I
Debris '` / ° (, !� ' e4.
I ;
"4111—
.2t Fyn
FY Sz 1,4, y:.: ,4,:::::--V
F
o
t 3 - yµ Y-,,7 , :
11411414114,°4427<c,
.*'"* Ford
s t 4 ?" Crossing
} 1u
Z Y i_ * fy q *'" qy` 1y' 7 up
Y
4 of �' a Or
415,
4, ,
, , r, IA .
, ..--0 , , ,,,.. --,.. VW .'ie.,* ,..; -, - :, , , ,
i..".,,,e. ‘L
1"''''v''A
�oay 4 A.,,
.1111
. ,,
Zj,i .70''XII7,t04
' _ � Culvert Y 4 .sa
r F-
'Pi,,... c- �
� 1 '... V- ,o t Davis Farm Trl r.Y• x.ti,.
tf !
Legend
✓ M I H`i
r _ t* 'P.Proposed Easement a � =�fi�
Landowner Parcel � 5~
Parcel od of A^ E? - 0��� +'`
9
Pond r 4, r^* r d►/p '"
W.
� 1 FEMA Zone AE (None)
I FEMA Regulatory Floodway(none) �r`rf
- .2% Chance Annual Flood (none) ` x .,
Existing Stream '
s
0N 's v
" Figure 8-Project Constraints Date: 3/12/2020
....,
ri ♦• ...�I..��.l Drawn by:GDS
vv+E
god +-■-�01 Feed and Seedre
__........,,,.h; aid
tic 0 300 600 Mitigation Project Checked by: JRM
I
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=600 feet

I - ''- , •^
ilk ir 04
'Werfr. 7
res
..•
,4,' •I . ,.e- , . ..
f•
. . . ,
- •, 0 ,, , r *4
- .., , • •:" * • - '
-, • --. .,.
• •
• , . •.
:, . ...„1. • :, f, . / ,,A e.,(‘‘ * ' 4. .
-,,-.. , ,r . ..-, ,-...w , . - ..: -...,..Q' . .. . ;,,,,t, /•••,—„,, lif ' ' •
. . . -
ti)...... _ . . ,
- •er
i ,.., (.1‘, ••• ‘
. . . / 7,.. Air_, .
b• .7. el' 44.0t , "..a. If
- , A, . ,'7" '.. • • ' 1r
i' 4',.-4 ..• ' 10.b • v''
t‘ 01111111S, 7r ,
, If W .' • .,-.1 ' 4 . ' F
'4... '
- • ' - 1•1, '',. • e 4::, ' - - .
. , ". , ' u ‘A) .0'
0, 110
' . ' " .. '1.." • - '; 4 • 0
' .*IC 4\$ ,/ i . • • . • ,.. tA •' • . ,ili — / ,._ •. . . .
.7 ''. - .1'. ' ' .' ' ' f , • , ,
•
150 300
0
ed id ,a 0 ••• -1.,-,/ .40 ,... 6/ ',-1
i• ,e,'' .' ,/ •' 1• ig P. • ...:. • -
' 11
• .ak Feet
%I
dr• til 46, ' ' , • • ft ,
' . ' 4 0.
•• •,. • •- a
. ::.:'•, • ', . „., / ''''' „ , ,,,,,41i' ?I iii.,...,,•'40, , ,,.,4,,-..' ..'• , . •1, .. , / • , .
.•0 .', ', .r- ;"- ,. ,4-‘,44..tt:Y. . -s,t•43'. . -4,, Figure 9-Monitoring Plan
. -t • ' 7 /.. . •ii.:#;.,
v. . •
Y ,, '01e, -ft.
.00
.,.. _ . .
,••• •
. V. ... 4 0 1 ' ' .. 4 - .4[0. AO*ai_ 0 Feed and Seed
. , . •
okii- D6
•, r ..„. ' . -- 4.
111,4.. Attiwli Mitigation Project
. . . t
a. ),;. i , 13..*•••*••••st
A'. ,
' / 1110te ' Randolph County,
4.00 /100•1.w.
/4440 ' ir4 . - - r'z ,,- villi.oikeee ' North Carolina
, 4.•
•
V
.41,. .
0....; •
0411100> • ‘'. / .4. :
, *
41030****, ./I ••
A., Date: 6/30/2020 Drawn by: GDS
4111w 000 .11.0'' _ a
0 11S*0.11110*St -t '. —- .--'w Checked by:JRM 1 in=300 feet
.Alli•:„„k ..-..0,000-00„ ,
,.
--111 4 111101111--& . .
_ . _ . . Legend
--41111-0100-40 •
41110.- 16 *Orr 111111111 Proposed Easement
'41* 1,r;011401110•11,
1104 111 104 ielismummussugmmoi-
• Buffer Mitigation Approach
f
i • 010toor : Eft'
• , 11 log V ; Restoration via Pond, 100
- ,
. ___------0 atCRoi 0011f ,ib...._,
.8 0 '4141161
0111 A- IIIII Restoration, 100
Ilik- IP' -------01110.•-10s0igIgP.Ir.oS.vi-s"-0.t0AIS"'I"S,'O...0'---•-''---.--.4- -
"'1,1A11'rdWifiv Oai-.lAi1lt'0.o1151111,,,o1.011l1.l1_sr1411o100lm10Ws
---
A
Enhancement, 100
k
00 wig 00 .. Restoration,200
Al 010 isoit.or 1111".m--,401111101114011100°'
111- 0 000... .41r-40114.04 4t 011,74011111,40111r•-
•01100410%• 10."-iir- liti...--14 .00116-00.0.00 Enhancement, 200
40.00001.1-1 "114,'• ft.D2 J'illiin 1111111„..1111,0. A ..11111,0•00.00," -
ACIOIrSilitir 004.6A1141111 ,...010111111110'. 0110 5 1111114000,
Algtielliali I eviii.V1111100111111011100 -10110 v A0110101019' Planting Approach
di' 0°"30*1111.* —.1111 1/10* 00 ° • isiO•
.10:111000-- - " 0001,-0000 x 0011111;.00' I 1 Full
0
,.. *fro- sfog•••••••••oks 000-0. .
0,-. ,--r Ro3 * i.ir 000% 1110 00 10, isliK
...a010.-.....1*- - -Li0 .41• ••110000110 ,1401110- Supplemental (0.31 ac)
via.—.111001.-1001101131WantioiA.--f _ .0.011111 .0 ....-10 --r,
104011101100111A 0 01 A gralgitak10316111 AOC,-, Stream Mitigation Approach
Af-,-,-01111,00111•11111.41110 41110`ar-- ' <ore
11.--00 Ih. 1 .4111
401 .41,0111-00.411 ... r .,.• —Restoration
o., 31011**011* 0%**iritt 4,:- Enhancement II
00000 400-w •ti -44 lioii es.
! 0011.0111,011117,011 '' 4s , —-No Credit
E i***0.°r400.Oe* • .
i 0101.000 101111•000 Vegetation Plot Type
. iiilf•11114•1041110110
1 Ille 11114 WOM1000 • • DWR
,,-, 0**ifall$0033*
-0 - • 01***V:41 IS 11.0 '•; , . **.0i*100lc11k11011io,li0 0iiIeo•1'Vtil-0n0I&at0--r-100
.rro.11--1i-•0ko11046A.fr 1-.k".10 l41l1If11i.1.i11..•.1-*0-*o• l
•A ,
r
•10 1,1W0Botpht,(NrnicC4ab1Iw
RillT:W,•11a4I4On4WW4d111 DWR)
1e441"V44
PR:)
4
p in Note: There will be 13 fixed vegetation plots,,
monitored and re.orted to the IRT.

Appendix AA
• RES Feed and Seed Mitigation Banking Instrument

AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE RES FEED AND SEED MITIGATION BANKING
INSTRUMENT IN THE RANDLEMAN LAKE WATERSHED FOR RIPARIAN BUFFER
MITIGATION CREDITS PURSUANT TO THE RANDLEMAN LAKE WATER SUPPLY
WATERSHED NUTRIENT STRATEGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PREAMBLE 2
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA 2
III. AUTHORITIES 3
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL 3
V. BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN 4
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION FOR THE BANK PARCEL 6
VII. CALCULATION OF MITIGATION CREDITS FOR THE BANK PARCEL 9
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE 10
IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING 11
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE 12
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE BANK PARCEL 12
ATTACHMENTS AND REFERENCES
Attachments
A—Division of Water Resources Authority Document
B —Randleman Lake Watershed Buffer Ledger Template
References
1. Riparian Buffer Mitigation Rule:
http://reports.o ah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015 a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20m anagement/subchapter%20b/15 a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
1

I. PREAMBLE
This RES Feed and Seed Mitigation Banking Instrument("Instrument")regarding the establishment,
use, operation, and maintenance of the Feed and Seed Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Bank Parcel"),
to provide Randleman Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer mitigation credits ("Riparian Buffer Credits")
is made and entered into by and among Environmental Banc and Exchange,LLC("EBX,LLC")acting
as the Bank Sponsor ("Sponsor"), and the North Carolina Depailiiient of Environmental Quality —
Division of Water Resources ("DWR"). This Instrument is in accordance with the Consolidated
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which became effective on November 1, 2015 see
Attachments and References.
The purpose of this Bank is:
A. To restore and preserve riparian vegetation adjacent to streams and/or agricultural ditches with the
intent to improve water quality within the Randleman Lake Watershed.
B. To convert agricultural land uses within riparian areas adjacent to streams, ponds, and/or
agricultural ditches into a dense, hardwood vegetated state with the intent to significantly reduce
nutrient loadings associated with agricultural practices into streams and ditches.
C. To provide mitigation and sell any resulting Riparian Buffer Credits to third parties in the
Randleman Lake Watershed, for development (both existing and proposed) requiring such
mitigation.
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA
A. The Geographic Service Area ("GSA") is the designated area wherein a Bank can reasonably be
expected to sell Riparian Buffer Credits for impacts due to development activities.
B. The GSA for this instrument is limited to the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed in the
Cape Fear River Basin.
C. Selling Riparian Buffer Credits shall be limited to the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed,
as defined in rule 15A NCAC 02B .0248, unless otherwise authorized by the DWR or delegated
local government in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
D. The following table provides site-specific details of the Bank Parcel proposed under this
Instrument, which is within the Randleman Lake Watershed (8-digit HUC 03030003);
Table 1.0—Site-specific Details
Bank Parcel County 14-Digit USGS DWR Project# Project Named Receiving Primary Land
Name HUC Location Stream Use/s
Feed and Seed Randolph 03030003010070 2018-1397 V1 35.883069, Randleman Lake Agricultural and
-79.856111 cattle pasture
2

III.AUTHORITIES
A. The Bank Parcel will be used to provide Riparian Buffer Credit in accordance with the
requirements in the DWR Authority document referenced herein as "Attachment A" and attached
to this Instrument.
B. Projects eligible for utilization of the credits are those requiring authorization under the
requirements of Attachment A and any new approved North Carolina ("State") statutes and rules
for the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed.
C. The selling of mitigation credits generated from the Bank Parcel approved under this Instrument,
shall be consistent with approved State statutes and rules for the Randleman Lake Water Supply
Watershed.
D. All mitigation activities proposed under this Instrument and corresponding Buffer Mitigation Plan
(Plan) to generate Riparian Buffer Credits shall be consistent with State statutes and rules for the
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed that are in place at the time a complete Plan is submitted
to DWR.
IV.ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL
A. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295, DWR has provided a "Site Viability Letter" for the
Bank Parcel proposed under this Instrument. The site viability letter is not an approval of the site
to generate Riparian Buffer Credits,but is a preliminary review of the Bank Parcel that details and
confirms existing land-use conditions, defines the riparian sites (Enhancement, Preservation or
Restoration), and identifies features (streams, ditches, ponds, etc.) that meet general criteria to be
suitable to generate Riparian Buffer Credits.Table 2.0 below outlines when a Site Viability Letter
was issued by DWR for the mitigation site proposed under this Instrument:
Table 2.0—Site Viability Letter Details
Viability Letter Viability Letter
Bank Parcel NC DWR Site Visit Received Expiration Date
Feed and Seed June 13,2018 August 2,2018 August 2,2020
B. A valid Site Viability Letter is required prior to submittal of the Plan. Site Viability Letters will
either expire on the dates listed in the table above or upon the submittal of an individual As-Built
Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. If the Site Viability Letter expires prior to submittal
of a complete Plan as described in Section V to DWR, then the Sponsor must submit a formal
request to DWR for a new Site Viability Letter for that Bank Parcel.
C. The Bank Parcel proposed for inclusion under this Instrument shall require a Plan be submitted to,
and approved by, the DWR prior to use of the individual Bank Parcel for mitigation purposes or
for any sale or transfer of any associated credits. The contents of the Plan are provided in Section
V.
3

D. This Bank Parcel is slated to be developed in conjunction with the RES Cape Fear Umbrella
Mitigation Bank, and the Feed and Seed Mitigation Site, United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Action ID # SAW-2018-01637, for stream mitigation. The mitigation plan associated
with this Bank Parcel has been submitted to the Interagency Review Team (IRT) for review and
approval.
E. The Plan submitted under this instrument will be placed on public notice and made available for
public commenting for 15 calendar days.
F. The Riparian Buffer Credits on this Bank Parcel will be generated along mitigated stream channels
and within the footprint of in-line ponds that are proposed for stream mitigation. The Stream
Mitigation Plan will be submitted under the RES Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank referenced
in "D" in this section. Additionally, all activities conducted within riparian buffers and adjacent
riparian areas for purposes of generating Riparian Buffer Credits will be conducted in concurrence
with stream mitigation activities. Riparian Buffer Credit may be achieved through restoration,
enhancement and preservation of DWR riparian buffers as they are defined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0250, and other riparian areas allowed per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) and(o) on the Bank Parcel.
Riparian Buffer Credits are only attainable if the width of the mitigated area is at least 20 feet as
measured perpendicularly from top of bank.
G. The Bank Parcel is intended to provide Randleman Riparian Buffer Credit as follows:
1. Planting hardwood trees and shrubs on a Restoration Site as defined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295(b) adjacent to mitigated streams.
2. Maintaining a Preservation Site as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(b) by placing a
conservation easement around riparian areas along streams as allowed by 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o).
3. Enhancing riparian areas that are being grazed by cattle by installing fencing to
permanently excluding cattle from the streams and their associated riparian areas as
allowed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6).
4. Diffused flow will be maintained onsite to the maximum extent practicable.
H. The Bank Parcel submitted for review under this Instrument is anticipated to begin stream
mitigation construction in Spring 2021.
V. BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN
A. The Buffer Mitigation Plan(Plan) submitted under this Instrument shall be submitted to DWR for
review and must be approved by DWR prior to any construction on the Bank Parcel. The Plan
must describe any changes that have occurred to the site between the date of the Site Viability
Letter and the date the Plan is submitted to DWR. The Plan shall include detailed information
consistent with the sections below concerning; 1) site location (14-digit HUC is required); 2)
existing conditions with current photos; 3) proposed buffer mitigation activities including a
detailed vegetation plan; 4) monitoring and maintenance plans; 5) financial assurances; 6)
4

associated buffer mitigation calculations, which shall include credit generation, service area, and
accounting as appropriate for each regulatory authority; 7) stream buffer determination letter from
DWR, and 8) Site Viability Letter from DWR; 9)a figure depicting the proposed stream mitigation
areas; and 10) service area figure for each mitigation type.
B. The Sponsor will obtain all applicable federal, state, and local documentation, permits, or
authorizations needed to construct and maintain the Bank Parcel. This Instrument does not qualify
as, or substitute for, such documentation,permit, or authorization.
C. Any restoration activities or proposed construction within riparian buffers and other riparian areas
on the Bank Parcel to produce Riparian Buffer Credit must be approved by DWR in writing prior
to implementation. The failure of the Sponsor to comply with this requirement may result in a
revised or reduced credit release schedule for the Bank Parcel. All restoration activities must be
performed in concurrence with any stream mitigation activities and not before.
D. Requests for deviation from the approved Plan must be submitted to DWR in writing. Written
approval from the DWR must be received prior to implementing any deviation from the approved
Plan.
Property Disposition & Long-Term Management for the Bank Parcel
E. Prior to the release of any credits, the Sponsor shall record permanent conservation easements at
the Randolph County Register of Deeds' office that is sufficient to ensure protection, operation
and maintenance of restored riparian buffers and other riparian areas for the duration specified in
the approved Plan.
F. The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the
State of North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall
be approved by the DWR and USACE prior to the release of any credits.
G. The Sponsor shall not grant additional easements, right of ways, or any other property interest in
or to the project areas, without prior approval from the DWR and the USACE.
H. The Sponsor agrees to transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity
to a qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal
Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The holder shall be a land
trust or stewardship program that will hold and enforce the conservation easement and the interests
in perpetuity. The Sponsor shall choose a land trust or stewardship program that is accredited by
the Land Trust Accreditation Commission and/or has been approved by DWR prior to the end of
the fourth-year monitoring period. A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
I. In the event the Sponsor is also the owner of the underlying fee interest in the property, the
conveyance of the conservation easement to a land trust or stewardship fund must be arranged at
the outset of the approved Plan.
Financial Assurances for the Bank Parcel
5

J. Following approval of the Plan for the Bank Parcel, the Sponsor shall provide
Performance/Maintenance Bonds from a surety company that is rated no less than an"A-" as rated
by A.M. Best, to construct the sites according to the approved Plans. It is the Sponsor's
responsibility to confirm that the surety company is rated no less than an "A-" with each annual
bond renewal.
K. The amount of the Performance Bond shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of
the mitigation activities of the Bank Parcel as described in the approved Plan. No bond shall be
less than $150,000.00 to cover construction costs.
L. Alternatively, in lieu of posting Performance Bonds, the Sponsor may elect to construct the
projects prior to the first credit releases.
M. For the Bank Parcel,once DWR has released all credits for completion of all the items listed below,
then the Bank Sponsor will be released from its performance obligations under the performance
bond required in Item J and K of this section:
1. Instrument and Plan approved by DWR, Stream Mitigation Plan approved by IRT,
Conservation Easement recorded and assigned, Financial Assurance posted;
2. Mitigation site earthwork and planting and installation of monitoring devices completed;
3. As-Built Report as described in Section VI has been received by DWR; and
4. DWR has submitted a written approval of the As-Built Report.
N. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
VI.POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION FOR THE BANK PARCEL
As-Built Report
A. The Sponsor agrees to perform all necessary work, in accordance with the provisions of this
Instrument and corresponding Plan, to establish, maintain, and monitor Randleman Lake
Watershed Riparian Buffers or other riparian areas until Item B (1) and(2) of Section X have been
satisfied.
B. When all stream mitigation activities have commenced, the Sponsor will submit an as-built plan
and report for the Bank Parcel within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the
riparian buffer mitigation areas. The as-built report will describe any deviation from the approved
Plan and will document the following:
1. Buffer restoration and planting details, invasive species control, confirmation of fence
installation (if applicable), monitoring device locations, vegetation plot locations, photo
point locations, surface and groundwater elevations, as appropriate, a summary of any
deviations to the Plan.
6

2. Provide confirmation that the construction of all stream mitigation activities has been
completed.
3. Boundary Survey of the conservation easement area, signed and sealed by a licensed
surveyor, including an inventory of the final mitigation areas for riparian buffer mitigation
credits in both square feet and acres.
4. As-built map of the mitigation area showing where riparian restoration and preservation
was performed and any deviations to the Bank Parcel from what was approved in the Plan.
5. As-Built map of the stream mitigation areas.
6. Aerial map of the mitigation area that was included in the approved Plan.
Financial Assurance for the Bank Parcel
C. After completion of the restoration/construction on the Bank Parcel, a Performance/Maintenance
Bond will be secured for 100%of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance
plan as described in the approved Plan and As-Built Report applicable for the site. The Bond must
be from a surety company that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best, and it is the
Sponsor's responsibility to confirm that the surety company is rated no less than an "A-" with
annual bond renewals.
D. A Performance/Maintenance Bond shall be secured each year for a minimum of five years, and
until DWR has released all mitigation credits to the Bank Sponsor. Upon receiving written
notification from DWR approving a monitoring report with no contingencies, the bond may be
lowered by a maximum of 20% for that next year's monitoring based on the adjusted cost to
complete the monitoring. No bond shall be less than $100,000 initially, to cover monitoring and
maintenance costs.
E. Once DWR has released 100%of all credits for completion of all Bank Parcel milestones described
in Table 3.0 of Section VIII and in the corresponding Plan,the Bank Sponsor will be released from
its performance obligations under the performance bond required in C and D of this Section.
F. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
Monitoring and Maintenance Reports
G. The Sponsor shall monitor the Bank Parcel as described in the Plan until such time as DWR
determines that the performance standards described below have been met. The monitoring period
shall be a minimum of five consecutive years.
H. Performance Standards for Vegetation: Native hardwood trees or native hardwood tree and shrub
species should be planted at a density sufficient to provide 260 stems per acre after five years. A
minimum of four (4) native hardwood trees or four (4) native hardwood tree and shrub species
7

must be planted. No one species shall be greater than 50% of the planted stems. A list of species
for planting will be detailed in the Plan for approval. Native hardwood tree volunteer species may
be included to meet performance standards as determined by the DWR.
I. A"stem" means a woody seedling, sapling, shrub or tree, no less than 10 centimeters in height.
J. If the performance standards of the vegetation are not met, supplemental plantings may be
required. Supplemental plantings will be utilized until the required densities have been achieved
and maintained for five years. Bank Parcel maintenance, such as ensuring diffuse flow,managing
invasive species, and pest control will be included in the Plan.
K. Monitoring Reports for Riparian Buffer Credit: Reporting criteria of the vegetation shall be
based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) — EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level
2 Plot Sampling only version 4.0 or any updated versions of this protocol in place on the date of
acceptance of the Plan. The Sponsor shall submit to the DWR an annual monitoring report no later
than December 31 of each year for a minimum of five consecutive years after the first full growing
season. This report will describe the conditions of the Bank Parcel, including an evaluation of the
performance standards of the vegetation contained within the approved Plan. Reports shall contain
the following:
1. A U.S. Geological Survey map showing location of the Bank Parcel;
2. A detailed narrative with supporting photos summarizing the condition of the Bank Parcel
along with any maintenance or remediation performed that year; and
3. A map, survey, or other figure showing locations of sampling plots, permanent photo
points, location of transects, etc.; and
4. Monitoring data, including specific vegetative counts and heights showing that the trees or
tree and shrub species planted are meeting performance standards and updated
photographs; and
5. A copy of the most recent Bank credit/debit ledgers; and
6. Corresponding verification letters from designated local governments upon request; and
7. Corresponding Mitigation Transfer Certificates upon request; and
8. Proof of performance bond renewal to cover the next monitoring year(if applicable)
Contingency Plans/Remedial Actions
L. In the event the Bank Parcel fails to achieve the performance criteria described in this Instrument
and the approved Plan, the Bank Sponsor shall develop necessary contingency plans in
coordination with the DWR and implement appropriate remedial actions for the Bank Parcel and
8

the Bank. Depending on the degree of remedial actions required, the DWR may modify the
monitoring period.
VII. CALCULATION OF MITIGATION CREDITS FOR THE BANK PARCEL
Riparian Buffer Credits
A. All Riparian Buffer Credits shall be determined based on the ratios and percentages provided in
15A NCAC 02B .0295(m) and(n).
B. Riparian buffer restoration on the Bank Parcel, as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n) and (o)
and defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(b)may be used for Riparian Buffer Credit.
C. Riparian buffer preservation on the Bank Parcel, as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) and
defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b), may be used for Riparian Buffer Credit.
D. Riparian buffer enhancement on the Bank Parcel, as described and defined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (0)(6)may be used for Riparian Buffer Credit.
E. Riparian Buffer Credit is defined as one (1) buffer credit per one square foot or 43,560 buffer
credits per one acre.
9

VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
A. Upon submittal of all appropriate documentation by the Sponsor, and subsequent approval by
DWR,it is agreed that the mitigation credits associated with the Bank Parcel will become available
for sale to a third party in accordance with the Credit Release Schedule below in Table 3.0.
Table 3.0 - Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer Credits
% Credit % Credit
Task Project Milestone Release Release within
the Pond
Footprint
Buffer Mitigation Plan Approved by DWR, Stream No credits released
Mitigation Plan Approved-by IRT, Conservation Easement 25 for areas within
1 Recorded and Item B (1) of Section IX in this Instrument pond fooOrint
has been completed and approved by DWR.* and Financial
Assurance Posted
No credits released
Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation 20 for areas within
2 of Monitoring Devices Completed
pond fooOrint
3 Monitorin Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of 10 55
As-Built Report
4 Monitoring Report#1: Approved by the DWR** 10 10
5 Monitoring Report#2: Approved by the DWR** 10 10
6 Monitoring Report#3: Approved by the DWR** 10 10
7 Monitoring Report#4: Approved by the DWR** 5 5
Monitoring Report#5: Approved by the DWR** and final 10
8 site visit by DWR has been conducted 10
Total 100% 100%
* For specification,please see Section V in this Instrument
** DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting performance standards contained within the
approved Plan
B. DWR may modify the credit release schedules based on the information submitted or the order in
which required information is received. DWR will notify the Sponsor of any modification to the
credit release schedule.
C. DWR may consider a Credit Release Schedule for a Bank Parcel based on the extent of change
between current onsite conditions and proposed post construction conditions.
D. The Sponsor must initiate implementation of the approved Plan for the site under this Instrument
in concurrence with all stream mitigation activities proposed in the approved Mitigation Plan
referenced in Item D of Section IV of this Instrument.
10

IX.PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING
Credit Ledgers
A. The Bank Sponsor shall maintain a credit ledger for the bank parcel under this Instrument: The
credit ledger shall provide the accounting for Riparian Buffer Credit in square feet and acres.
B. The credit ledger shall be submitted on a separate 8 '/2 inch by 11-inch spreadsheet with legible
font style and font size. The ledger shall be submitted using the templates provided in Attachment
B of this Instrument or any updated versions to these templates as provided by DWR.
Credit Processing
C. Riparian Buffer Credits generated on this Bank Parcel will be used to provide mitigation for
authorized buffer impacts within the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed according to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295(g).
D. Riparian buffer restoration, enhancement, and preservation credits generated on this Bank Parcel
are not transferrable into Nutrient Offset Credits.
E. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain written verification of buffer mitigation required from the delegated
local government in the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed or DWR prior to debiting
Riparian Buffer Credits from the individual Bank Parcel.
F. All credit and debit transactions for the bank parcel under this Instrument shall be accurately
depicted in the credit ledgers. The Bank Sponsor shall provide DWR up-to-date credit ledgers for
the Bank by the tenth(10th) of each month. At a minimum and upon request, DWR shall receive a
hard copy of updated credit ledgers along with the corresponding Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificates and all corresponding letters from the designated or delegated local governments or
DWR where applicable once a year. Notification of all credit sales shall be provided to DWR until
all credits that have been released have been sold.
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates
G. All credit sales will include a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate("Certificate") that is required
to be provided to the buyer of Riparian Buffer credits, that will include, at a minimum, the
following information:
1. Bank Details: (1) Bank Sponsor Name, (2) Bank Parcel name as it appears in this
Instrument, and (3) DWR project number for the Plan as it appears in Table 1.0 of this
Instrument.
2. Credit Details: (1) date of receipt, (2) identify if full or partial payment, (3) amount of
Riparian Buffer Credits purchased in square feet and the confirmation from DWR or the
local government of the amount required.
11

3. Permitted Project Details: (1) project name as it appears on DWR or local government
permits and/or certifications, (2) 14-digit HUC, (3) confirmation of location within the
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed, (4) DWR authorization number or delegated
local government requiring Riparian Buffer Credits for the project.
H. If the DWR determines that the Bank is operating at a deficit(e.g. the Sponsor is closing on sales
and/or transferring credit that is not available), or the Bank is selling credits out of compliance
with statutes, rules or this Agreement, the sale/transfer of credits will immediately cease, and the
DWR, in consultation with the Sponsor,will determine what remedial actions are necessary.
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE
A. Bank Parcel Closure shall be identified as the event when the Sponsor is relieved of all of its
responsibilities to the Bank Parcel and there are no Riparian Buffer Credits left to sell.
B. Bank Parcel Closure shall commence only after all of the following events have occurred:
1. Transfer or assign the conservation easement and all of its interests,in perpetuity, to a land
trust or stewardship program as described in Section V of this Instrument.
2. All five years of monitoring completed,and all monitoring reports submitted and approved
by DWR.
3. All credits have been released and debited and updated ledgers showing zero credit
balances have been submitted and approved by DWR.
XI.GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE BANK PARCEL
A. Upon the presentation of proper credentials, and during normal business hours, the Sponsor and
the landowner shall grant permission to the Director of DWR, or authorized representative of the
Director of DWR, to enter the property containing the Bank Parcel.
B. Amendments: This Banking Instrument may be amended or modified only with written approval
of all signatory parties, including the USACE if it is applicable to the amendment.
C. Any transfer of the Sponsor's rights or obligations outlined in this Instrument or any other
agreement referenced in this Instrument to a third party must be approved by DWR prior to the
transfer.
D. Force Majeure: After 100% of all of the credits have been released according to the credit release
schedule in Section VIII and confirmation has been received by the DWR that the Conservation
Easement has been successfully assigned in compliance with Item H of Section V, the Sponsor
will not be responsible for Bank failure that is attributed to natural catastrophes including but not
limited to flood, drought, disease, regional pest infestation, etc. that are beyond the control of the
Sponsor.
12

E. However,if an event occurs before 100%of all of the credits have been released according to the credit
release schedule in Section VIII, then the Sponsor shall take remedial action to restore the property
to its condition prior to the event, in a manner sufficient to provide adequate mitigation to cover
credits that were sold prior to the occurrence of the event. Such remedial action shall be taken by
the Sponsor only to the extent necessary and appropriate, as determined by DWR and the Sponsor.
DWR must concur in writing that a force majeure event has occurred for this provision to apply.
F. Oversight: Actions taken by DWR may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Site visits,
2. Issuance of Site Viability Letters,
3. Plan review and approval of items listed in Section V of this Instrument,
4. As-Built Report review, and approval of items listed in Section VI of this Instrument,
5. Monitoring Report review, and approval of items listed in Section VI of this Instrument,
6. Credit Ledger review and approval of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument,
7. Certificate review of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument and cross analysis to
credit ledgers and,
8. Information requests, file reviews and audits
G. Reports, ledgers,files and other information shall be made available to DWR upon request,unless
otherwise specified in this or any other document.
H. Validity of the Banking Instrument: This Instrument will become valid on the date of the last
party's signature.
I. Specific Language of Banking Instrument Shall Be Controlling: To the extent that specific
language in this document changes, modifies, or deletes terms and conditions contained in those
documents that are incorporated into the Instrument by reference, and that are not legally binding,
the specific language within the Instrument shall be controlling.
J. Any disputes over decisions regarding this Instrument, shall be referred to the Director of DWR
for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S.
150B.
K. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and is entered into knowingly, intelligently, and
voluntarily.
13

L. Notices: All notices and other communications which may be or are required to be given or made
by any party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been properly given and
received on the date delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, registered or
certified, electronic mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set out below, or at such other
addresses as specified by written notice delivered in accordance herewith.
If to Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc& Exchange, LLC
Attention: Mr.Matt Butler
3600 Glenwood Ave.
Suite 100
Raleigh,North Carolina 27612
Matt Butler
[e-mail]
If to DWR: NC Division of Water Resources—401 &Buffer Permitting Branch
Attn: Nutrient Offset and Buffer Banking Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
14

M. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC &EXCHANGE, LLC
By: Brad Breslow (Print)
St (Signature)
Title: Regulatory Manager
Date: 9/29/2020
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-DIVISION OF WATER
RESOURCES
By: Danny Smith (Print)
(Signature)
Title: Director,Division of Water Resources
Date:
15

Appendix AB
• RES Feed and Seed Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset

ems::
• Y_u
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
August 2,2018
Jeremy Schmid
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street,Suite 110
Raleigh,NC 27605
(via electronic mail:jschmids`tzres.us)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset- Feed and Seed Site
Located near 6194 Lewis Davis Rd, Randleman,NC
Randleman Lake Watershed/HUC 03030003
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Schmid,
On April 16,2018, Katie Merritt,with the Division of Water Resources (DWR),received a
request from you on behalf of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) for a site visit
near the above-referenced site in the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River
Basin.The site visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation within a
proposed Easement Boundary,which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled
"Existing Conditions". On June 13, 2018,Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject
site.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for
the riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank
(TOB) and landward 200'from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015).
T E Q Y
aqumay
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

L y 1 Feed and Seed Site
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
August 2, 2018
Feature Classification 1Subject Riparian Land uses Suffer 2Nutrient Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite La adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable at
Rule 2.273
lbs/acre
RD1 Stream Yes — Combination of Yes3°4 N/A Non-forested areas-Restoration Site per
forested&non- 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
forested pasture
grazed by cattle;a Forested Areas- Enhancement Site per 15A
collapsed NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)if fence is installed or
culvert/crossing was Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295
observed(see map) (o)(5)if fence isn't installed.
and unstable banks
were present due to Minor bank stabilization and grading needed
hoof shear where bank stability is compromised and where
erosional rills and gullies are observed.
Collapsed culvert/crossing has caused impeded
flow in the stream and needs to be removed or
replaced.
RD2 Stream Yes Combination of Yes3°4 N/A Non-forested areas-Restoration Site per
forested&non- 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
(at DWR forested pasture
flag) grazed by cattle; a Forested Areas- Enhancement Site per 15A
collapsed culvert was NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)if fence is installed or
observed(see map) Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295
(o)(5)if fence isn't installed.
Minor bank stabilization and grading needed
where bank stability is compromised.
Collapsed culvert/crossing has caused impeded
flow in the stream and needs to be removed or
replaced.
RD3 Stream Yes Combination of Yes3°4 N/A Non-forested areas-Restoration Site per
forested&non- 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
forested pasture
grazed by cattle Forested Areas- Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)if fence is installed or
Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295
(o)(5)if fence isn't installed.
Pond 1 In-line pond Yes non-forested pasture Yes N/A Perimeter/Fields-Restoration Site per 15A
grazed by cattle NCAC 02B.0295(n)
RD4 Stream Yes Combination of Yes3°4 N/A Non-forested areas-Restoration Site per
forested&non- 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
(below forested pasture
DWR grazed by cattle. Forested Areas- Enhancement Site per 15A
flag) NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)if fence is installed or
Page 214

Feed and Seed Site
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
August 2, 2018
Feature Classification 1Subject i Riparian Land uses Buffer ' 2Nutrient Mitigation Type Determination w/in 1
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable at
Rule 2.2 73
_ 1 e
RD5 Stream Yes Non-forested pasture Yes N/A Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
(at DWR grazed by cattle
flag)
RD6 Stream Yes Mostly non-forested Yes3'4 Non-forested areas-Restoration Site per
pasture grazed by 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
cattle with a forested
strip near proposed Forested Areas- Enhancement Site per 15A
easement boundary NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)if fence is installed or
(see map);unstable Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295
banks were present (o)(5)if fence isn't installed.
due to hoof shear
Minor bank stabilization and grading needed
where bank stability is compromised.
1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated July 24,2018 using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil
survey map prepared by the NRCS
2 NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with
Riparian Buffer Establishment
3The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%) of
the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a
Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
4The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC
02B.0295(o)(6). Cattle exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit
under this part of the rule.
5The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channel shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total
area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (o)(7).
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant
to 15A NCAC 02B .0295,a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written approval
prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for buffer
mitigation credit.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration,enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC
02B .0295 to be eligible for riparian buffer mitigation credits.
This viability assessment will expire on August 2, 2020 or upon the submittal of an As-Built
Report to the DWR,whichever comes first. A map for reference is attached to this letter and
was initialed by Ms. Merritt on August 2,2018. This letter should be provided in all stream,
wetland or buffer mitigation plans for this Site.
Page 314

1 J Feed and Seed Site
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
August 2, 2018
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919)-707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins,Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
KAH/km
Attachments: Existing Conditions Map
cc: File Copy(Katie Merritt)
Page 414

tor: -id Rig(Ara.
- "•A_r `- - .- -�3 i .r1. _ -:'.ram i ,Q.S----�7— • -1
3.4;4141k
,pc. •..s. ‘ „ ,
. - . - 4.4.11:17-,,..„,'4.; .",,•‘\i
11
} .sue.. ; �. „ Y .4%,...-. •
11,
. 4 PA . If • ... '
...
/
. ��: .1
e•`4 %r rti1:'. ail. , y
Ili-
f • • •t JJ/ kr
`yam .; : ►< - feI ` ',
L 4 t •'•a ,i I. i •it
lk
" .l' .� ` i -79.8556, 1 $ ft- "T, -. • • •
lit{�� {y1^ ` a :.
� ,.IN 'Erfir:}
V� k, •�L r'.1. - Cr
..r1...
G 35.8811 {3 + .
V y o
r
1 - 1 - Legend
r --_ • • Ell Point
!i •'s, � 4 .aitr% '' Streams
a ,;�
r- Proposed Easement
3 r77'
$ * �ii_i�ii! Ponds
r r
t. I + ,.06,,,,iii �' Parcels
. C
/1I1 Existing Conditions-Post Site Visit ,e: 6/19/2018
3 WE
Feed and Seed Mitigation Site Dawn by.MDE
7 0 200 `
4 F
.1 t HUC 03030003 0 res
Randolph County,North Carolina
v•
to\g.

J

Appendix B
• Initial Evaluation Letter
• Public Notice Agency Correspondence
• Correspondence with US Fish and Wildlife Service
• Correspondence with NC State Historic Preservation Office

l, T °p DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
1`� AI WILMINGTON DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS
a _ 2, 69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
W v,
q �'��, WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
', ,1}1
yrT REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
April 17, 2019
Regulatory Division/1200A
Action ID No. SAW-2018-01637
Re: NCIRT Initial Review of the RES Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument,
Feed and Seed Mitigation Site Prospectus
Mr. Brad Breslow
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,North Carolina 27605
Dear Mr. Breslow:
This letter is in regard to your prospectus document dated January 2019, for the proposed RES
Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank and Feed and Seed Mitigation Site.The proposal consists
of the establishment and operation of a commercial umbrella mitigation bank, and the associated
25.62 acre Feed and Seed Mitigation Site, located approximately 5.6 miles southeast of Archdale,
in Randolph County, North Carolina (35.883069° N, -79.856111° W). The proposed Feed and
Seed Mitigation site would include stream restoration and enhancement activities within four
unnamed tributaries to Randleman Lake in the Cape Fear River Basin(8-digit hydrologic unit code
(HUC): 03030003).
The Corps determined the Prospectus was complete and issued a public notice (P/N# SAW-
2018-01637) on March 13, 2019. The purpose of this notice was to solicit the views of interested
State and Federal agencies and other parties either interested in or affected by the proposed work.
Attached are comments received in response to the public notice from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic
Preservation Office.
The Corps has considered the comments received from members of the Interagency Review
Team (IRT) and information that was discussed during an IRT site review on October 16, 2018.
We have determined that the proposed umbrella mitigation bank appears to have the potential to
preserve and enhance aquatic resources within the 8-digit HUC 03030003 of the Cape Fear
River. Therefore, the bank sponsor may proceed with preparation of a draft Umbrella Mitigation
Banking Instrument(UMBI).

Please provide a response to the attached comments with your draft UMBI submittal. We
appreciate your interest in restoring and protecting waters of the United States. If you have
questions regarding this letter,please contact me at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office by email
at [e-mail] or telephone [phone], Extension 22
Sincerely,
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List

1.0S.,t4T
United States Department of the Interior
y
' ' ..; `o FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
) . •
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
�'\\\4j�cw s °' Raleigh,North Carolina 27636-3726
March 29, 2019 RECEIVED
APR 0 3 2019
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District RALEIGH REGULATORY
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office FIELD OFFICE
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: RES Cape Fear 03 UMB(Feed and Seed Mitigation Site)/SAW-2018-01637/ Randolph County
Dear Mrs. Dailey:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(Service) has reviewed the project advertised in the above
referenced Public Notice. The project, as advertised in the Public Notice, is expected to have
minimal adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Therefore,we have no objection to the
activity as described in the permit application.
In accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (ESA) and based on the
information provided, and other available information, it appears the action is not likely to adversely
affect federally listed species or their critical habitat as defined by the ESA. We believe that the
requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied for this project. Please remember
that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information identifies impacts of this
action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this
action is modified in a manner that was not considered in this review;or, (3) a new species is listed
or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
For your convenience a list of all federally protected endangered and threatened species in North
Carolina is now available on our website at<http://www.fws.gov/raleigh>, Our web page contains a
complete and updated list of federally protected species,and a list of federal species of concern
known to occur in each county in North Carolina.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed action.
Should you have any questions regarding the project, please contact Kathy Matthews at(919)856-4520,
extension 27.
Sincere'', �.f]� - ���
-' 2/
.I ,-(Pete Benja`riin, -
Field Supervisor .
cc: NMFS, Beaufort, NC
EPA,Atlanta, GA
WRC, Raleigh

10' 1 7.7'
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
April 4,2019
Samantha Dailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
Re: Establish RES Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank,Feed and Seed Mitigation Site,
SAW 2018-01637,Randolph County,ER 19-0997
Dear Ms. Dailey:
We have received a public notice concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore,we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review@a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
_fz_A.,zt_ Atd101-Wtt-6-
Ramona M. Bartos
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

Appendix C
Site Protection Instrument (s) and Longterm
Stewardship Program Overview and Monitoring
Report Template
Site Protection Instruments *
Model Conservation Easement
Note: This appendix will be updated as the easement deeds and plats become available.
Longterm Stewardship Program Overview and Monitoring Report
Template

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S
USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made
this day of , 202_ by and between
("Grantor") and _ ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said
parties, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural,
masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated,
lying and being in County, North Carolina, more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational
corporation, association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of
the Internal Revenue Code, and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq., the purposes
or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open-space aspects of

real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational,
educational, or open-space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic,
natural, or aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the
following natural communities: [add or delete as appropriate: coastal wetlands,
non-riparian wetlands, riparian wetlands, perennial and intermittent streams
and riparian buffers]. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain
streams, wetlands and riparian resources and other natural values of
approximately acres, more or less, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein
by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent the use or
development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose or in any
manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the
Conservation Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation
Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the
Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW-
, entitled "Agreement to Establish the
Mitigation Bank in the _ River Basin within the State of North
Carolina", entered into by and between [enter Sponsor name], acting as the
Bank Sponsor, and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in
consultation with the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The
Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps for use as
a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts
authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the
Conservation Easement Area is also a condition of the approval of the
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking
Instrument (MBI)and Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) or
Mitigation Plan for the Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Bank, North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
Project ID# , which was approved by the NCDWR, and will
be made and entered into by and between [enter Sponsor name], acting as
the Bank Sponsor, and the NCDWR. The Riparian Buffer
and Nutrient Offset Site is intended to be used to compensate for riparian
buffer and nutrient impacts to surface waters.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third-
Parties," to include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through the
appropriate enforcement agencies of the United States and the State of North
Carolina, and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of
enforcement under the NCDWR Project ID# and the
Department of the Army instrument number SAW

("Mitigation Banking Instrument"), or any permit or certification issued by the
Third-Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in
perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the
extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on
Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation
Easement is an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by
Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors
and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent
with the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The
Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and
restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the
conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities
and uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated
hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance,
alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement
Area or any introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is
prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any
building, mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other
advertising display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock
or any other temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the
Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential
and/or commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes
are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing,
animal husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area

are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction,
harming, cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the
Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan and
BPDP/Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for
purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the
Mitigation Plan and BPDP/Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more
than five consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this Conservation
Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact vegetation or disturb
soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by [enter Sponsor name] and
shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or
walkways on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or
modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation
Easement Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying
the conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving
directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Conservation
Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the
Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes,
garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous
substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or
aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation Easement
Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading,
filling, excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand,
gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography
of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to
restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and
enhancing streams and wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area,
[enter Sponsor name] is allowed to perform grading, filling, and excavation
associated with stream and wetland restoration and enhancement activities as
described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking,
draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related
activities, or altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or
disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns.
In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or
underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means,
removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or
wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been

encumbered or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be
transferred pursuant to a transferable development rights scheme or cluster
development arrangement or otherwise.
[Not required, but may be added if Grantor and Grantee agree:]
L. Subdivision. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the Conservation
Easement Area currently consists of within
separate parcels. The Grantor may not further subdivide the
Conservation Easement Area, except with the prior written consent of the
Grantee. If Grantor elects to further subdivide any portion of the Conservation
Easement Area, Grantor must provide the Grantee the name, address, and
telephone number of new owner(s) of all property within the Conservation
Easement Area, if different from Grantor. No subdivision of the Conservation
Easement Area shall limit the right of ingress and egress over and across the
Property for the purposes set forth herein. Further, in the event of any
subdivision of the Property (whether inside or outside of the Conservation
Easement Area) provision shall be made to preserve not only Grantee's
perpetual rights of access to the Conservation Easement Area, as defined
herein, but also Grantee's right of perpetual access to any conservation
easements on properties adjacent to the Property which form a part of or are
included in the Mitigation Plan or BPDP/Mitigation Plan. Creation of a
condominium or any de facto division of the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited. Lot line adjustments or lot consolidation without the prior written
consent of the Grantee is prohibited. The Grantor may convey undivided
interests in the real property underlying the Conservation Easement Area. The
Grantor shall notify the Grantee immediately of the name, address, and
telephone number of any grantee of an undivided interest in any property within
the Conservation Easement Area.
M. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not
limited to, motorcycles, dirt bikes, all-terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is
prohibited other than for temporary or occasional access by the tenter Sponsor
name], the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors, assigns, NCDWR,
and the Corps for purposes of constructing, maintaining and monitoring the
restoration, enhancement and preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian
areas within the Conservation Easement Area. The use of mechanized
vehicles for monitoring purposes is limited to only existing roads and trails as
shown in the approved in the Mitigation Plan and BPDP/Mitigation Plan.
N. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the
Conservation Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the
purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental
systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III.
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives,
heirs, successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation
Easement Area for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation

Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the
Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to
hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell,
transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement Area, in whole or
in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor,
its successors and assigns, including [enter Sponsor name] acting as the Bank
Sponsor, the right to construct and perform activities related to the restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within
the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved
Mitigation Plan, the approved
BPDP/Mitigation Plan, and the two Mitigation Banking Instruments described in
the Recitals of this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor,
its successors and assigns, the following rights in the areas labeled as "Internal
Crossing" on the plat [insert plat name and recorded plat book page number] in
the Conservation Easement Area: vehicular access, livestock access, irrigation
piping and piping of livestock waste. All Internal Crossings that allow livestock
access will be bounded by fencing and will be over a culvert.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns,
the Corps and NCDWR, shall have the right to enter the Property and
Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his
personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the
terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement.
The Grantee, [enter Sponsor name], and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, the Corps and NCDWR shall also have the right to
enter and go upon the Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making
scientific or educational observations and studies, and taking samples. The
easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V.
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, the Corps,
and NCDWR are allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation
Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to
require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the
terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of
the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The
Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions
constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after 30 days, the
Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal

proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a
temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of
the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise
materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement.
The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage
to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition
to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in
connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction
or restoration, including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys'
fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be
responsible for the breach. The Corps and the NCDWR shall have the same
rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions of
this Conservation Easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or
provision hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other
covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce
the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be
construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or
change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the
Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of
God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent
action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI.
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns
the Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the
Property which may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement
or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other
interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this
Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the
use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this
Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons. -
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms
of this Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that
transfers any interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area.
The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60)
days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the
terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and
easement interests in the Conservation Easement Area or any portion thereof
and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written

consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of
this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however
that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or
assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will
be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34
et seq. and § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the
Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or
assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The combined Mitigation
Banking Instruments: MBI with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and MBI with
corresponding BPDP/Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets
forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation
Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings
or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found
to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder
shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate
taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall
keep the Property free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations
incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
expressly subject and subordinate to the Conservation Easement. Grantee shall
not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership,
operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits
that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long-Term Management. Grantor is responsible for all long-term
management activities associated with fencing. These activities include the
maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures to ensure the aquatic
resource functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are
sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render
impossible the continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the
conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may only be extinguished,
in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation
Easement Area is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to
substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this Conservation
Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of
such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct
damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property

interest immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted
following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall
be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as
determined at the time of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other
communication required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such
address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Sponsor:
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District, Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
To NCDEQ -DWR:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to
enforce this Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified
grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of
these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this
Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall become vested in
another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate proceeding in a
court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but
only in a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment
does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of
the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The
wetlands, scenic, resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of
the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use and state of
improvement, are described in Section of the Mitigation Plan, prepared
by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and
accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this
report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes in the use
of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the

use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the Conservation
Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually
unto Grantee for the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and
seal, the day and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]

dotloop signature verification:dtlp.us/4g9n-WObs-gzAP
Unique Places
To Save
February 26, 2020
Matt Butler
RES
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Mr. Butler,
This letter confirms that Unique Places to Save ("UP2S"), a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization located in the
State of North Carolina, has preliminarily agreed to act as the conservation easement grantee and long-term
steward for the Feed and Seed Mitigation Project ("Site") located in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030003)
in Randolph County, North Carolina. The Site consists of an approximate 27.58-acre conservation easement
area. As the conservation easement grantee and long-term steward, UP2S has agreed to and shall be
responsible for periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement
are enforced and maintained into perpetuity. Specific responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of Site is conducted on an annual basis.
• Visits to Site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage and fencing (if applicable) for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are addressed following
protocols contained in the UP2S Conservation Easement Violations Policy.
UP2S shall receive a stewardship endowment from Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC ("EBX"), the Site
sponsor, in the amount of $39,242.86 to ensure annual Site inspections occur and the terms of the
conservation easement are legally defended into perpetuity. UP2S shall also require an administrative fee of
$3,000.00 upon execution of a Stewardship Agreement between UP2S and EBX.
3 dotloop verified
#e, 0226/20 12:34 PM EST
SQ HQ-E1 XL-OECE-A2FG
Jeff Fisher, Board Member Representative Signature
Unique Places To Save EBX/RES
_Matt Butler
Printed Name
_02/26/2020
Date
PO Box 1183 • Chapel Hill, NC 27514 919-428-2040 [e-mail]

Unique Places to Save Annual Monitoring and Legal Defense Endowment
I Feed and Seed Easement-CONFIDENTIAL
Units Hours Cost/Unit Frequency Annual Cost
Annual Monitoring
Staff time to monitor mitigation easement,including file review,
travel time,on site time,post visit report production 27.58 ac 7 $60.00 Annual $420.00
Staff time needed to address minor violations or issues N/A 10 $600.00 Once every 10 yrs. $60.00
Mileage 140 N/A $0.575 Annual $80.50
Lodging Costs 0 N/A $0.00 Annual $0.00
Meal Costs 1 N/A $20.00 Annual $20.00
Insurance N/A N/A $100.00 N/A $100.00
Total Annual Funding Amount $680.50
Capitalization Rate 3.50%
3Monitoring Endowment
Accepting and Defending the Easement in Perpetuity
Staff time for major violations N/A 80 $60.00 N/A ' $4,800.00 i
Legal Counsel N/A N/A N/A N/A $10,000.00
Other Incidentals N/A N/A N/A N/A $5,000.00
Stewardship Complexities N/A N/A N/A N/A $0.00
Monitoring Endowment) $19,800.007
Total Monitoring and Legal Defense Endowment $39,242.86

Appendix D
• USACE JD Submittal Package (8/29/2019)
• USACE Correspondence (9/3/2019)

302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
r es
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd.Suite 650
Houston,TX 77006
Main:713.520.5400
August 29, 2019
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Field Office
331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
Dear Ms. Dailey,
Resource Environmental Solutions(RES)is pleased to present this Request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination for Feed and Seed Mitigation Site located in Randleman,Randolph County,North Carolina.
As part of this scope of work,RES is submitting this request to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
for a confirmation of the limits of Waters of the U.S. on the subject site.
The Feed and Seed Mitigation Site (the "Site") is located within a watershed primarily composed of
agriculture, forests, and low-intensity residential areas. The Site will involve the restoration and
enhancement of four unnamed tributaries to Randleman Lake. The Site was identified as having potential
to help meet the compensatory mitigation requirements for stream impacts in hydrologic unit code (HUC)
03030003 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The Site provides 25.62 acres of proposed conservation easement.
The conceptual design presents 3,188 linear feet of stream mitigation generating 2,638 Stream Mitigation
Units (SMUs).
The Site will restore, enhance, and protect an important aquatic resource and wildlife corridor while also
accommodating existing agricultural land uses.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me at
[phone] if you have any additional question regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Schmid l Senior Ecologist
Attachments: Jurisdictional Determination Request Form, Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form,
Landowner Authorization Form,Vicinity Map, USGS Topographc Map,National Wetlands Inventory
Map, Soils Map, Potential Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map, and Wetland Data Sheets
res.us

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency,please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 6862 Davis Country Rd
City, State: Randleman, NC
County: Randolph
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 7747665722, 7747565971
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jeremy Schmid
Mailing Address: 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone Number: 919-345-3034
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
riInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Ryans S. Davis, Sr., and spouse, Toni O. Davis
Mailing Address: 6862 Davis Country Rd
Randleman, NC 27317
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Landowner Authorization Form
Site:
Property Legal Description
TRACT 1
Deed Book:2086 Page: 791 County:Randolph Parcel PIN: 7747665722
TRACT 2
Deed Book:1302 Page: 537 County: Randolph Parcel PIN: 7747565971
TRACT 3
Deed Book:2086 Page: 793 County: Randolph Parcel PIN:7747789806
Street Address:at/near 6862 Davis Country Road,Randleman,NC 27317
Property Owner: Ryan S. Davis,Sr.,and spouse,Toni O.Davis
The undersigned,registered property owner of the above property,do hereby authorize
Resource Environmental Solutions,the NC Division of Water Resources,and the US Army Corps of Engineers,
their employees,agents or assigns to have reasonable access to the above referenced property for the evaluation of
the property as a potential stream, wetland,and or riparian buffer restoration project,including conducting stream
and or wetland determinations and delineations,as well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s)or
certification(s).
Property Owner Address:6862 Davis Country Road,Randleman,NC 27317
I/We hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge.
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) Date
O 0 COS t
(Property Owner Printed Name) Date

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
ElI am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
171
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
I r l Size of Property or Review Area 27 acres.
nThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.8841
Longitude: -79.8548
InA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water,relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters,waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States,wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
I , l Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
El Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps,FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
nNCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
nNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
L Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02AppA Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 08/29/19
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jeremy Schmid
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-R
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Randolph City: Randleman
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.8841 Long.: -79.8548
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Randleman Lake
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
see attached table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
n Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity, USGS, NWI, Soil, Existing conditions, WOUS •
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
n D• ata sheets prepared by the Corps:
n Corps navigable waters' study:
n U• .S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
n USGS NHD data.
n USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U• .S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24k Pleasant Garden
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
n N• ational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
n State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n F• EMA/FIRM maps:
n 1• 00-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
n P• hotographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Updated Aquatic Resources Table- 11/13/2020 Updated based on survey post Mitigation Plan development and design
Waters_Name State Cowardin_Code HGM_Code Meas_Type Amount Units Waters_Type Latitude Longitude Local_Waterway
WA NORTH CAROLINA PEM Area 0.87 ACRE DELINEATE 35.884 -79.855 Randleman Lake
WB NORTH CAROLINA PEM Area 0.13 ACRE DELINEATE 35.8843 -79.8562 Randleman Lake
WC NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area 0.07 ACRE DELINEATE 35.8833 -79.8558 Randleman Lake
WD NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area 0.04 ACRE DELINEATE 35.8825 -79.8565 Randleman Lake
WE NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area 0.05 ACRE DELINEATE 35.8816 -79.8578 Randleman Lake
WF NORTH CAROLINA PEM Area 0.43 ACRE DELINEATE 35.88 -79.857 Randleman Lake
WG NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area 0.04 ACRE DELINEATE 35.8827 -79.856 Randleman Lake
WH NORTH CAROLINA PEM Area 0.01 ACRE DELINEATE 35.8824 -79.8555 Randleman Lake
OW-1 NORTH CAROLINA POW Area 0.59 ACRE IMPNDMNT 35.8802 -79.8573 Randleman Lake
RD1-A NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 183 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8841 -79.8554 Randleman Lake
RD1-B NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 588 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8841 -79.8554 Randleman Lake
RD2 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 1756 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8823 -79.8567 Randleman Lake
RD3-A NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 104 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8808 -79.8576 Randleman Lake
RD3-B NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 71 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8808 -79.8576 Randleman Lake
RD4-A NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 61 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8829 -79.8558 Randleman Lake
RD4-B NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 160 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8829 -79.8558 Randleman Lake
RD5 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 119 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8879 -79.8501 Randleman Lake
RD6 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 157 FOOT DELINEATE 35.8891 -79.8508 Randleman Lake

Crosswalk through Reach Labels Across Project Life History
Prospectus JD Submittal Draft/Final Mitigation Plan Updated PJD (Nov 2020)
RD1 RD1 RD1-A RD1-A
RD1-B RD1-B
RD2 RD2 RD2 RD2
RD3 RD3
RD2 Not Included RD3-A RD3-A
Not Included RD3-B RD3-B
RD4 RD4 RD4-A RD4-A
RD4-B RD4-B
Not Included Not Included RD5 RD5
Not Included Not Included RD6 RD6

ih2
..s
00 =
a�
Feed and Seed
Study Area s
b 1
V .
�
v
i°
V. Providence Church Rd
Holly n
Rage
:1(lIn;
311
Gs
ti,
9h
/ V :
ei2
n
S•phia 494
r °ap• Randleman
'''
S'St
Legend
Proposed Easement _ 2p5
HUC: 03030003010070
E.
N Project Vicinity Date: 11/16/2020
E. r_._::..,804,-.:, w E res
�+•�=�_+:� �`�'=!."�� Feed and Seed Drawn by: GDS
s Mitigation Project Checked by: JS
♦t' 0 0.5 1
P o Mile
Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=1 mile

•
rJl i t •• s+ ._ 4ie.a.>/ ... -
z
. ;-----.44., , . A, ...,„_,
7c.,
• • r •• J
\.1. • 7&.) ,.o. 1 ,
.,,I,
".M..- .lej.::'";.. . ' I°, .' g
4, . .
• • • `
l 178 78 ac •
. kt ' -
Gahtec _
- ) ,,z ' -"`7---Lti.).
.11Z:Atie
• I .kV...7' ./..., • 1
`i: \
. . - RD5 ...." ilk—
I!to ti �/ _ •' 4 ac
s
• RD1
•,I41t
• RD3 ' ( •'
lac
■
• ,: /-\/1/2/‘, .
_ . (:,_ ( , , ,;,yet-- -!.. Zo,i-
•
��
, ) 5
' 'ter ,- ", '4 RD2
`rf/�i? y� 1` _ _,�% •
I •�- t. • 73 ac
. At" --.• .. n
Lie/
4 - •.; •
- 'ilsji 41 - 1 .0. '.-"s'- •
l'\. . i ./') 4•;17:., -i s' . . .. ,
/ , ,,,f.,,,._..„:„- , /\., .. .. ,.. _ . _ .......... .
, /7-4::;z) 4,e. . )1 ..--.' u_.. 7 ,
----,c . .
..,-
• _ •
. .,,
11.1..11,:: .
-r , � •
� • i� mot'
at\„i,., ,
Legend 4\ k •
,rr _ ` _
Proposed Easement(27.58 ac) . � 1_94ii • `1 ,
t
�_ Drainage Area / •
om
N USGS Pleasant Garden Date: 11/16/2020
��'�� " Quadrangle (1983)
E. *.. -��w)14. .rtt w e Drawn by: GDS Pres
+'•.�.-+,,,; ��`1��� Feed and Seed
+v.,� 0 500 Mitigation Project Checked by:JS
Feet Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet

1, __/-
, A
MeB2
W
/ Ma
iZirS
o
,1
r.
-.
MO ,x_.
Legend
MeB2
Proposed Easment (27.58 ac)
Hydric (100%) "1r
Predominantly Hydric (66 99%)
Partially Hydric (33-65%)
s Predominantly Nonhydric (1 32%) II ^ '�
f
Map unit symbol Map unit name
_ Nonhydric (0%) MeB2 Mecklenburg clay loam,2 to 8 percent slopes,moderately eroded
WpC Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
N Mapped Soils(NRCS June 2019) Date. 12/3/2020
.,_:,
_..w...,..N.._:, w E 0 res
ri •. ��n•I����f Drawn by: GDS
_ _�,:._,:,.,.._� ?gda?iSeedon Site Checked by: JS
ram, 0 150 300
�Feet
Randolph County, North Carolina 1 inch=soo feet

x
#
;> PFO1A
—__. _ PAB4Hh �4 in
PUBHh
PFO1A
/
n /
4
/
,x ,a x
,4''' ‘t, -
�"� �'i�° ay ,�.t� Z�x rate t �� �� x .„'.}"" L. ':"�k -
i!,''.5eit .'"'*' 4-t----1, ,,,r. ,-, 4 ',,,, '', ,,:,.',4 . wfik,.7,,- ' , , ...,
.;_l -k,,,v,.".'..4.4,,,,,, .,,,,,‘„t ,:-. ,- 4,111, 1.,,,,-. , r,,t, -, -1.- ,, , , ,_ .. -, -
yy
i.
`
/
r
fx
n
4+Y 4 !W 4 ka O 'X a1*i1FT#.. ^`
"f s 7a t. r:
�E .a 3 .1r3rr N^ T s\ ` ',
U®v
lir
e. as '"'-
Legend
Proposed Easement(27.58 ac)
M NW Wetland (USFWS 05/01/2020)
N National Wetlands Inventory Date. 11/16/2020
+E
ri' •. ��n�I1��.f Drawn by: GDS
+•••.�•i: 4'+� Feed and Seedores
�r;` o ,50 30o Mitigation Proj Checked by: JS
F� Randolph County, North
ect Carolina 1 inch=500feet

Updated based on survey post Mitigation Plan development and design 11/16/2020
Waters Name Type Area .- ;.- _ ., , x
' Ste
WA Wetland 0.87 ac - - > tee a
' ' : res
WB Wetland 0.13 ac A iS 1
WC Wetland 0.07 ac •
'
WD Wetland 0.04 ac N
WE Wetland 0.05 ac
. w E
WF Wetland 0.43 ac "'
WG Wetland 0.04 ac 45)
, s
WH Wetland 0.01 ac v' 0 200 400
Il
OW-1 Open Water 0.59 ac • ,' �, Feet
�.' 1 in=400 feet
•
+t
Potential
', a• ,r Wetland or Non-Wetland Waters
of the U.S. Map
-' 4+ , ' : s
,� N. , �` '` Feed and Seed
V`. '' Mitigation Project
_ __- _ , - _ 4z � , North Carolina
Randolph County
{{ .�y.
"; 'u ti x` *w .�' :1 V", ,\� `,'�4vA.. '''' w`.: t it i •k'n ° , ;
-r- ,`4C'' �` A '°�• y - a '4;: .' Date: 11/16/2020 Drawn by: GDS
' h'tx: _ r... " t»;:.- •
v .. .'' y ,i - S a''k ,� a , '"hr f'`{rr I .:w+ Revisions: NONE Checked by: JS
,n '�: $ ` .'^;, ,3: '' p.,+' `'R'T7" a-:?g5 ,,,�.,'r?� .y ,,,.4., du :` 9, tad
.. ... er,, .'}+".;.sty a:;, +; t :•c+f,�.`3,� M1 ar ,1' `t` � L611‘ .k.
� `,, M y x "ram,:-
;o �v I. s 3 ' { a. Legend
RD 1 A p$
.�, . i RD1.g x ,,' n .. , ,; Proposed Easement
,* y? s4. P ,.4 a. M t - C ry 1' t ,". `T;: *.x ,'` `"�"'/ �. \
s x F1,
, \, n {k /Dpi ,A, Potential Wetland
t a zM 'i j e 1A ,z ? �t y. _ }� ��� Waters Of the U.S'
�a
* 1AW/
� CDC x, Open Water
'' 3 .; / , ,' �� , Potential Non-We land
;� '$4 i, a•' CO Waters of the US t
N. o _ ^, Datapoint
\i`°r/. Uplandapo"
° w'G `A' Uri
' tea,' .,... {} Wetland Datapoint
_ 9, tip...::',;';:4t,,,::;ic,.,.;:;0;4,,4,,,,,,,,: . '- ' . -
A
4)t " `
r } M w
•
n
N �'` w -f �$p , P � REFERENCE
" ",k g,. ,., + .. 1)Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z15N.
tj • ( 4. ti - 10 T. ,:- 'd t �^Y p• _ 2)Map Projection is NAD1983StatePlane_
�; ' ��9 �� 4.t - q - North Carolina FIPS_3200 Feet
0
v
M _*- - t
11
401'.2.fill IN,
'ry,ck nrY'W oOd �� ' - - - - �L11�j��ETV IRPT40.ar ��
fig' I' ,.,• .. ~ �J #`��
c a
r r,�►
�a

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Feed and Seed City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 12-Aug-19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): J.Schmid Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Valley bottom Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.8841 Long.: -79.8548 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes-Pointdexter-Wynott complex,8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑d ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings -Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area Yes 0 No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Active Pasture
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
d❑ Saturation(A3) ❑d Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑d Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No O Depth(inches): _
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes 0 No O Depth(inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DPI
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_ ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 0 ❑ 0.0% That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
Total Number of Dominant
3 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4 0 ❑ 0.0%
5 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Percent of dominant Species
6. 0 ❑ 0.0%
That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
0 =Total Cover OBL species 35 x 1 = 35
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
0 ❑ 0.0% FAC species 0 _ x 3 = 0
23. 0 ❑ 0.0% FACID species 0 x 4 = 0
4. 0 ❑ 0.0%- IDPL species x 5 = 0
5 0 ❑ 0.0% column Totals: 70 (A) 105 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index= B/A= 1.500
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑d Dominance Test is>50%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑d Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 =Total Cover ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 0 ❑ 0.0% be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. o ❑ 0.0% _ Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6. o ❑ 0.0% Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7 - -- (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 =Total Cover of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1• Juncos effusus 20 ❑d 28.6% FACW vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. Leersia orvzoides 15 ❑d 21.4% OBL Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3. Persicaria pensvlvanica
15 ❑d 21.4% FACW regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4• Eleocharis quadranqulata 10 ❑ 14.3% OBL Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
in height.
5. Carex lurida 5 ❑ 7.1% OBL
6• Murdannia keisak 5 ❑ 7.1% OBL Five Vegetation Strata:
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
0 ❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
9' Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% _ than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 70 =Total Cover
Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
0 ❑ 0.0% including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
1 species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
4. _
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
5. _ 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic
6. 0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
0 =Total Cover
Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DPI
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) ohColor(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks _
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 Silt Loam
2-8 Gleyl 4/N 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL Sandy Clay Loam
8-16+ 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 4/4 10 C PL Sandy Loam
'Type:C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? yes 0No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Feed and Seed City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 12-Aug-19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): J.Schmid Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): convex Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.8841 Long.: -79.8548 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes-Pointdexter-Wynott complex,8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑d ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings -Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Active Pasture
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No O Depth(inches): _
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes O No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP2
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:- ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 0 ❑ 0.0% That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% -
Total Number of Dominant
3 0 ❑ 0.0% - Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4 0 ❑ 0.0%
5 0 ❑ 0.0% - Percent of dominant Species
0 ❑ o.o% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
6. -
7 0 ❑ 0.0% - Prevalence Index worksheet:
g 0 ❑ o.0°io _ Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
0 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1 0 ❑ 0.0%
2.
0 ❑ 0.0% FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% FACU species 90 x 4 = 360
4. o ❑ 0.0%- UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5 0 ❑ 0.0% Column Totals: 90 (A) 360 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index= B/A= 4.000
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is>50%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 =Total Cover ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 0 ❑ 0.0% be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. o ❑ 0.0% - Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6. o ❑ 0.0% - Four Vegetation Strata:
❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
0
7• - - -- (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 =Total Cover of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1• Asclepias syriaca 10 ❑ 11.10/0 FACU vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. Festuca arundinacea 80 ❑d 88.9% FACU Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3 0 ❑ 0.0% regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0 ❑ 0.0% Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
4' in height.
5. 0 ❑ 0.0%
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Five Vegetation Strata:
7 0 ❑ 0.0% -
- Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
0 ❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
9' Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10. 0 ❑ 0.0% - vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% - than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 90 =Total Cover
Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
0 ❑ 0.0% including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
1 - species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% - Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
4. _
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
5. _ 0 ❑ 0.0% -
Hydrophytic
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
0 =Total Cover
Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks _
0-8 10YR 3/3 100 Loam
8-12+ 10YR 4/3 100 Sandy Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Feed and Seed City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 12-Aug-19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): J.Schmid Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Valley bottom Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.8833 Long.: -79.8557 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes-Pointdexter-Wynott complex,8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PF0
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑d ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings -Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area Yes 0 No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
active forested pasture
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑d Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) ❑d Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑d Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No O Depth(inches): _
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No O
(includes capillary fringe) Yes O No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP3
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_ ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1• Acer rubrum 50 V 71.4% FAC That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Platanus occidentalis 20 0 28.6% FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3 0 ❑ 0.0% Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4 o ❑ 0.0%
5 o ❑ 0.00%0 _ Percent of dominant Species
6.
0 ❑ o.0% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 0 ❑ o.0% _ Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
70 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
4. o ❑ 0.0% _ IDPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5 0 ❑ 0.0% column Totals: 150 (A) 440 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.00%0 _ Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.933
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑d Dominance Test is>50%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑d Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 =Total Cover ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2. Ligustrum sinense 20 ❑d 100.0% FACU ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 0 ❑ 0.0% _ be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. o ❑ 0.00%0 _ Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6. o ❑ 0.00%0 _ Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7 - -- (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 20 =Total Cover of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1• Microstegium vimineum 40 ❑d 80.0% FAC vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. Persicaria pensylvanica 5 ❑ 10.0% FACW Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3. Juncus effusus
5 ❑ 10.0% FACW regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
o ❑ 0.0% Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
4' in height.
5. o ❑ 0.0%
6 0 ❑ o.o°io _ Five Vegetation Strata:
7. o ❑ 0.0%
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
0 ❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
9' Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% _ than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 o ❑ 0.0% Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 50 =Total Cover
Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
1• Smilax rotundifolia 10 0 100.0% FAC including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
. _
% height.
4 0 ❑ 0.0
5. _ o ❑ o.o%
Hydrophytic
6. 0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
10 =Total Cover
Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) ohColor(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks _
0-3 7.5YR 3/2 100 Loam
3-8 10YR 5/3 90 5YR 4/4 10 C PL Silty Clay Loam
8-16+ 10YR 5/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL Clay
'Type:C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? yes 0No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Feed and Seed City/County: Randolph Sampling Date: 12-Aug-19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): J.Schmid Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): convex Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.8833 Long.: -79.8557 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes-Pointdexter-Wynott complex,8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings -Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No O Depth(inches): _
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes O No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP4
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_ ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1• Acer rubrum 20 V 28.6% FAC That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Ouercus alba 10 ❑ 14.3% FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Carpinus caroliniana 10 ❑ 14.3% FAC Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4 Liriodendron tulipifera 20 0 28.6% FACU
5 Liguidambar styraciflua 10 ❑ 14.3% FAC Percent of dominant Species
6.
0 ❑ 0.0% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
g 0 ❑ o.0°io _ Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
70 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
2.
0 ❑ 0.0% FAC species 140 x 3 = 420
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% FACU species 45 x 4 = 180
4. o ❑ 0.0%- UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5 0 ❑ 0.0% column Totals: 185 (A) 600 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index= B/A= 3.243
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑d Dominance Test is>50%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 =Total Cover ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1• Liaustrum sinense 15 ❑d 100.0% FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4 0 ❑ 0.0%
5. o ❑ 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6. o ❑ 0.0% Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7 - -- (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 15 =Total Cover of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1• Microstegium vimineum 80 ❑d 100.0% FAC vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3 0 ❑ 0.0% _ regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0 ❑ 0.0% Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
4' in height.
5. 0 ❑ 0.0%
6 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Five Vegetation Strata:
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
0 ❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
9' Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% _ than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 80 =Total Cover
Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
1• Toxicodendron radicans 10 0 50.0% FAC including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. Vitis rotundifolia 10 0 50.0% FAC m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
4. _ _
5. _ 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic
6 _ 0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
20 =Total Cover
Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by RAG.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks _
0-4 10YR 3/3 100 Loam
4-12+ 10YR 4/4 100 Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

From: Jeremy Schmid
To: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
Cc: Matt Butler
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]RE: Preliminary JD Request-Feed and Seed
Date: Tuesday,September 3,2019 8:48:59 AM
Thanks Sam!
Jeremy Schmid, PWS
Senior Ecologist
RES I res.us
Mobile: [phone]
Sent from mobile device
On Sep 3, 2019, at 6:54 AM, Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Considering the small size of the project area, and the fact that I distinctly
remember being out on the prospectus site visit, I do not see the need to schedule
an additional JD visit. As such,the Corps concurs with your JD submittal, dated
August 29, 2019. As with previous bank JDs,the approval will be completed in
conjunction with the bank approval. Please let me know if you have any
additional questions.
Thank you,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From: Jeremy Schmid [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 3:33 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Butler<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Preliminary JD Request- Feed and Seed
Dear Ms. Dailey,

Resource Environmental Solutions (RES) is pleased to submit a Preliminary JD
Request for the Feed and Seed Mitigation Project. The Site, located in Randolph
County, contains approximately 3,200 linear feet of stream mitigation. The
purpose of the site is to generate mitigation and ecological benefit in the Cape
Fear River Basin.
The attached JD Package includes: preliminary JD form, landowner authorization
form, supporting figures, and wetland/upland data forms. Thank you for your
prompt attention to this important project and please let me know if you have any
questions or require any additional information.
Jeremy Schmid, PWS
Senior Ecologist
RES 1 res.us <Blockedhttp://www.res.us/>
Mobile: [phone]

Appendix E
• NC DWR Stream Determination Letter

iA..- :..L 14.: .;.
ii
1' JLfI .7,
"Eh,aril wiliii.
NORTH CAROLINA
ROY COOPER frrkrtlnrnerrlai Quality
Corvolve
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
frrrerkro Director
July 24, 2018
Brad Breslow
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson St 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Randleman Lake Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0250)
Subject Property: Feed and Seed Mitigation Site, 6862 Davis Country Rd, Randleman NC, Randolph
County
Dear Mr. Breslow:
On June 13, 2018,at your request,Sue Homewood conducted an on-site determination to review features
located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state
regulations. Katie Merritt with the Division of Water Resources (Division) — 401 & Buffer Permitting
Branch was also present during the site visit.
The attached sketch depicts the channels that were reviewed during the site visit. Channels RD1, RD2
(at the start point identified on the attached sketch), RD3, RD4(at the start point identified on the
attached sketch) and RD5 as shown on the attached sketch were determined to be intermittent
channels. Channel RD6 was determined to be a perennial stream. All channels are subject to the
Randleman Buffer Rules cited above. In addition, the pond above channel RD3 is directly connected to
RD3 and therefore also subject to the Randleman Buffer Rules cited above. These regulations are
subject to change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in
any future correspondences concerning this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter.
, DI,E Q)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
450 W.Hanes Mill Rd,Winston-Salem,NC 27107
336.776-9800

Page 2 of 2
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination
by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing
c/o 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that
dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface water from
the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party(including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within
Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have any additional
questions or require additional information, please contact me at 336-776-9693 or
sue.homewood @ ncden r.gov.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
RES Existing Conditions Map
Cc: Ryan Davis Sr and Toni Davis, 6862 Davis Country Rd, Randleman NC 27317
Katie Merritt, DWR (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office

iiiiir—r.---, imp7 ._ -
A , , _ 7-7-- ---:"." i •••: •
ft, .."
u-ri
, -, r —
{ r` '
E = G . !Si‘ 1 x,,e .,, "'0-.` --
, .
. 5.. 0 ,„ _ �� k
. ,,,,, ,,, . ,,,
,.
0 , --. 4 . 1" s , .s .'i ' Ill_j 4 ..--4,
�,...••
. f, _•
_
• .? 04.1.) ---- :*. -.. Al) 4)* -
orii:44::i
L., .
_,.. A hh. ' t 4-<:;-'- -----' "
r ,fir, �' �'` _ ���... ,, v`1',
,,
,- -- -- & • 77isi,- " -• ••'-.7 - ..,,-. ‘,.: ,/,' —ir -------...•. \\\k _-`• v,
.' ' i ' 111111101111111111.11I: I N •/
r IV 1
* 'N - : 7,, _;,. ,I , 1 '
• ..
� Z ° n A ° y .
Vidtle - i A
& . ' \\4144(7 i r\IT . s• ' tk
Villtipfrpp vralipfr. '' c.dargiiiiiiie' 'a . . • 1
__ _,, _
, r-- ----
19ibt , d6- •e � 7 1 �
I dit _ •�• \ � �,� .-ram 1 ‘:-�
.i _y ,...,.:•,,,, . _ , . \. _ ,.....„
a+a vim, .
1 "(
4....7
� .-s a'--:I�• , is � oft
•
Wiiir-'0" )‘'Ni
E 1 •
Y —
i / Z- o
. r > A
..:_. „
,,,_,...„., -,,,,
,„ ,,
•
EiLiN l /�� i'2
j (� / L/---).? / ' ' -'.-..\--,H . '\'''..
f',- , . --%-).., . (3 <r)i \
— r- C'(_ -
ce:• a G.', i -�
/ � J'
f / 1 . 4
Legend ( ����///jjj
Proposed Easement L1 (\/ f/
..--iTh
N
2. Figure 2 - USGS Map Date. 9/30/2019
2. .�- :ii,40 :.+ W E Feed and Seed Mitigation Drawn by: GDS r s
w a.► v .1�
5 aIs�,o, s Project Checked by xxx
1P4. 0 1,000 2,000 HUC 03030003
Feet
Randolph County 1 inch=2,000 feet

•
�r+ 7 t y', p V� - yam,
b Ir }
r; am' .W = 5 x 0 ` �l P j: 1 E ,dx ���, ,,4
:-,..--.:::',1-!,5-'''4,*-:, 'ik:-., fr--"' lit,„ .,.4.....i,,, __„,„,,,,, ,,,.. :,.. ,...:,„:"...,,„:„,,,,,..,:.;
^ ti �a y a' � , � •k :fig _ 1'+
xr .
,
a
. t -..-:t''':.:tr tv.. ,Z1,.;.„.; -t''-'4.'t,-;!. --t, itt ! - lifittic:-: . -,-, -
1 T
Awl' ,� i
e +s�
-,;,.,,,,-,..,,-;:;.-;,:r;-:•;4-..i-4.,,,_:,r;•t••....?,-•.7,,.-. . • _
-4.v..,,,,, ..,..•.4...7,..we,,, ,.. 011, .„.
: ,,,,,,i,,,,,e.,-,....„„r.. .,„=„•,.......,-,:,..:;,..„ „..,., .
,.. .
„....* :::,..u...;.„:,,,,.-.1,..i,4::•.,,..4-.:.:•,-;•-i-,.., ..
. .
-.:.•;;::.i. , ..,..2,.1...,...,...,.=.
r ..
� .y r i
,.-,. w,- , ...�< __ $ Yr - f R.
„
t ,
.
'
Pi,
35.8811, 1..
-79.8583111111/ ,, ..
-fir;
O
Eit,
35.8826, ,.
-79.8556NA
= , . . ..,..
V"
A
..1
..T , ...
..)
. e,
4 'Y
Li v
Legend
i II Proposed Easement
.1`, , Landowner Parcels
•
410 t yA, Parcels
Aril
g.
Pond
Streams
1
• Stream Origin
N
Existing Conditions -Post Site Visit Date: 9/30/2019
�;;�;,; Feed and Seed ::e:Y:D:x
w E Pres
0 200 400 HUC 03030003tt
Randolph County, North Carolina f inch=400 feet
Feet

Appendix F
• USACE NCWAM Wetland Forms

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WA Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WB Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WC Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WD Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WE Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WF Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Particulate Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Physical Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WG Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Feed and Seed/WH Date 08/13/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid/RES
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) YES
Habitat Conditon LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

Appendix G
• USACE NCSAM Stream Forms
• Project Morphological Table
• Project Cross-section Plots and Photos
• Reference Reach Cross-section Plots and Photos

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Feed and Seed Mitigation Site-RD-1 Date of Evaluation 6/12/2018
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Feed and Seed Mitigation Site-RD-2 Date of Evaluation 6/12/2018
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Feed and Seed Mitigation Site-RD-3 Date of Evaluation 6/12/2018
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Feed and Seed Mitigation Site-RD-4 Date of Evaluation 6/12/2018
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Jeremy Schmid
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Flood Flow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability HIGH HIGH
(4)Channel Stability HIGH HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability HIGH HIGH
(3)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall MEDIUM MEDIUM

Feed and Seed Morphological Parameters
Reference Reach Existing
UT to Muddy Creek RD1-A RD1-B RD2(US) RD2(MS) RD2(DS)
Feature Riffle I Pool Riffle I Riffle I Pool Riffle Riffle Riffle I Riffle I Riffle I Pool Riffle
Drainage Area(ac) 224 84 161 27 54 73
Drainage Area(mi2) 0.35 0.13 0.25 0.04 0.08 0.11
NC Regional Curve Discharge(cfs)2 44 22 34 10 16 20
VA Regional Curve Discharge(cfs)3 16 6 12 2 4 6
Design/Calculated Discharge(cfs)1 30 - - - - -
Dimension
BKF Cross Sectional Area(ft) 10.6 21.8 4.0 4.2 4.5 6.1 1.8 4.1 4.3 3.9 4.4 5.7
BKF Width(ft) 9.7 11.7 3.7 4.4 4.3 7.8 3.2 5.6 5.7 3.7 3.5 6.2
BKF Mean Depth(ft) 1.1 1.9 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.3 0.9
BKF Max Depth(ft) 1.4 2.7 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 1.2
Wetted Perimeter(ft) 10.8 13.9 5.5 5.7 6.2 8.6 3.9 6.5 7.0 5.7 5.5 7.3
Hydraulic Radius(ft) 1.0 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8
Width/Depth Ratio 8.9 6.3 3.5 4.5 4.0 9.9 5.6 7.7 7.5 3.4 2.8 6.7
Floodprone Width(ft) 19.0 >50 12.0 24.5 >25 >25 5.0 9.1 8.0 5.1 4.3 8.0
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 >2.2 3.2 5.6 >2.2 >2.2 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.4
Bank Height Ratio 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.0 4.3 2.7 3.3 3.2 2.7 3.3
Substrate
Description(D50) Sand Sand Sand Sand/Gravel Gravel Sand/Gravel
D16(mm) 1.1 0.67 - - 1.3 -
D50(mm) 1.9 1.2 - - 32 -
D84(mm) 18 8.4 - - 60 -
Pattern
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 12.7 26.7 - - - - - - - - - -
Radius of Curvature(ft) 16.5 26.0 - - - - - - - - - -
Radius of Curvature Ratio 1.6 2.5 - - - - - - - - - -
Meander Wavelength(ft) 33.7 56.0 - - - - - - - - - -
Meander Width Ratio 3.2 5.4 - - - - - - - - - -
Profile
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Riffle Length(ft) 6.4 21.8 - - - - - - - - -
Run Length(ft) - - - - - - - - - - -
Pool Length(ft) 30.0 41.3 - - - - - - - - -
Pool-to-Pool Spacing(ft) 54.3 67.9 - - - - - - - - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length(ft) 136 518 214 343 950 310
Channel Length(ft) 192 589 251 428 991 344
Sinuosity 1.41 1.14 1.17 1.25 1.04 1.11
Valley Slope(fUft) 0.072 0.009 0.005 0.024 0.012 0.009
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.060 0.008 0.005 0.020 0.012 0.008
Rosgen Classification E5 E5 E5 G4 G4 G4
1 Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data
2 NC Regional Curve equations source:Doll et al.(2002)
3 VA Regional Curve equations source:Lotspeich(2009)

Existing Design
RD3 RD4-A RD4-B RD1(US) RD2(US) RD2(MS) RD2(DS) RD3 RD4
Riffle Riffle Riffle Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool
7 15 15 84 27 54 73 7 15
0.01 0.02 0.02 0.13 0.04 0.08 0.11 0.01 0.02
4 6 6 22 10 16 20 4 6
1 1 1 6 2 4 6 1 1
- - - 9 3 9 11 5 4
0.8 1.3 1.8 5.1 9.6 2.2 4.2 3.8 6.9 4.6 8.4 1.5 2.7 1.9 3.5
2.7 2.2 2.8 7.6 9.0 4.8 6.0 6.4 7.8 7.6 9.3 4.0 4.7 5.0 6.0
0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6
0.6 1.1 0.8 0.9 1.8 0.6 1.2 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0
3.1 3.5 4.4 8.0 10.3 5.1 6.6 6.8 8.9 7.9 10.3 4.2 5.3 5.2 6.5
0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5
9.4 3.8 4.4 11.3 8.4 10.7 8.6 10.7 8.7 12.7 10.1 10.7 8.2 13.3 10.3
4.8 14.1 3.6 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20
1.8 6.4 1.3 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2
3.3 1.0 4.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cobble/Boulder Sand/Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
-
-
-
-
-
7 15 3 12 4 18 11 23 4 6 5 9
-
-
-
-
-
18 26 10 18 14 21 16 22 9 12 10 20
-
-
-
-
-
2.4 3.4 2.1 3.8 2.2 3.3 2.1 2.9 2.3 3.0 2.0 4.0
-
-
-
-
-
51 71 28 50 40 66 60 70 26 34 31 42
-
-
-
-
-
0.9 2.0 0.6 2.5 0.6 2.8 1.4 3.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.8
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
-
-
-
-
-
7 14 4 11 6 16 7 15 4 10 6 9
-
- - - - 14 28 9 23 14 21 16 22 8 15 9 17
- - - - - - 25 38 14 28 21 36 32 45 10 20 12 22
153 85 119 160 356 921 350 94 113
179 87 138 174 394 1019 400 101 119
1.17 1.02 1.16 1.09 1.11 1.11 1.14 1.07 1.05
0.036 0.041 0.032 0.005 0.017 0.011 0.011 0.016 0.013
0.031 0.040 0.028 0.005 0.0150 0.0100 0.0100 0.0150 0.0120
G3 E4/5 G4 C/E C/E C/E C/E C/E C/E

A yt p
(Y� � s s n
7111
frye a _r
x4111Vis. n l,.s �r _ <n�.,.-+_. __ '"lzr a..� _- `e` _
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD3 -XS1 (Riffle)
95.5
95
94.5
94
c 93.5
j 93
d
92.5
92
91.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

✓�7 �. -RCS �y'e13;: `J
y�_ 's - ors"* . `' ' , fi *-`
-'1-'�, `tea " ' , ea`-P. a. --',',
ry Nk.
°I'p '&ate.") ..YK - /4 Y _ - t,
1. +F , `�1 - 7 � W. `.' 3 yw, *-
, '
41111
Ups ream I owns ream
Reach RD2 -XS2 (Riffle)
95
94.5 -
94
93.5
93
E.
c 92.5
0
92
w 91.5
91
90.5
90 r
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance(ft)
Ground -Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

--.‘ ,_.•,' ',IA:\.i .
y
1� } ��` _ air ��;� i' ,. �..
i '.die i�� C Iy�
O •a
t` s J r i
:.':''' ''1 U.''''. ii.iki:Tr,:%lie 4.;...' ''.1:e4.'7 'A.*.!'.1:li'i,'.;.,...4,,,:?,);,,:j.:'-7:.:,...4.%':,.'..
ay
^mow ti+,,,. ''9 Ys 3� � y "� °]
a� •r �`'? . te, ; ,� < x r - . - ,
{ r �' `r . - • r may'- c y K�y
'ki"3 Y.,G�. 4•.� 5 . - ,r'�.1 's -,df �i Y =i �i...r �,:!`uP, '^s
f`ti— �' T -y., i� yA � '--ram a-,<.
.� �-i r,.� 3 + r a ti9 .ia�a - 'L�` 'k . -�i` • %r fi a
;. ,.' ___ .; 1
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD2 -XS3 (Riffle)
96
95.5
95
94.5
94
p 93.5
j 93
d
w 92.5
92
91.5
91
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

b .1‘. Fit i e*' A;,.,' . :'15, '''....ii.'44-- .4 ''' ' "- '''''P '-':'117i,.'4.' -'''.'''i'....Ar'''4 - '
•
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD2 -XS4 (Pool)
9s
95
94
93
•
\Lamor
0 92 •
R
u 91
w
90
89
88
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

,,,,,,. _ . . . .- ...,. ..i.,,, ,_.-,;;,,;;;.-.14.x''L...4.:.:.,,,ifif..f..-:'.. ,..7
_� a,,, .,fir, z .: !
tip y,
L l YA1 tea J^
•�^ - _ •
''' .' ,.+•'.. r.'. - -- -A v . i . .L
..,, ____ __ ___ _ ___,,,...-,-
Upstream tream Downs
Reach RD2 -XS5 (Riffle)
102
101
-too V.', 99
\\ /...
0 98
R
d
w 97
96 y�J
95
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance(ft)
Ground -Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

k
x,ate- i -, 4
{_ Upstream Downstream
Reach RD2 -XS6 (Pool)
101 -
100 •� •
99
4/1
E.
c 98
0
R
u> 97
w
96
95
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Distance(ft)
Ground -Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

a
1 �r t oh vu ] -1
<R 4 �
4 3
A
y. ti f
r C Lh x� te - .r
' (a4 - --- 8 ''sP ./ v.' "''''' .r•�a •,a r q� .,-•+ �i � v b. f.six fl�.
li �f"4 R / 6a L��� brae " h
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD4 -XS7 (Riffle)
96
95.5
95
94.5
w
94
c
0
(Ls 93.5
d 93
w
92.5
92
91.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance(ft)
Ground -Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

-y
` W W '1/2y 9 J $ t .s s e.b� h a;4rS �,
�� {{ =: Ate.`
,,,ir- ,A..,,, ....; .:::...._._-,, -
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD1 -XS8 (Riffle)
97
96
w
p 95 •
R
d
w
94
93
0 5 10 15 20 25
Distance(ft)
. .Ground Approx.Bankfull Flood Area

•
'sr alb S� ' y-y � i" �., TM, . ,' o, '`-,Vr, j0 < --*: . IIFf.. ' �„ s x a a4tt a,, . A c• iS1akda " A.'� ' �' j� >1 "
6. ..:,i,!'.',iv,..A,.74‘,..‘ ...,, . e;),,,, ,,,,•.,. ....?„:,,,,,,,,,A„„s,,!:,,,,,.,:,„....,,,
i.,i _...„,. •.•••••
i:„,,,e._. ,,,__..,,,......._,,. :,..,
0:. .„....;,.....„:7„,,,,0„,,,....4e7.7,..,,,.,.....„,.::, ,,I,!„..,,,,...,,„.ittr. ,,,.Upstream Downstream
Reach RD1 -XS9 (Riffle)
101
100.5
100
99.5
w
0 99
R
u 98.5
w
98
97.5
97
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull Flood prone Area

1
.-.tyn � k F3 � j i
44k,
i
/,f ..ice z t /
Upstream Downstream
Reach RDI -XS10 (Pool)
101
100 •
w
O 99
«r
R
d
w
98
97 I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Distance(ft)
-Ground -Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area

r
'- -5 a '
,���� v yr - JE.'4F r-7\c. ..,: ,, ,. - i---1. *. --
�`,'�.-N,`" * t ice" wG-'"" �`;�° .�,.' .. �YY��
041
eat. , ;tii �z
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD4 -XS11 (Riffle)
95
94.5 n
94
93.5
w 93
--------\y
0 92.5
R
d 92
w
91.5
91
90.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

t ! IT % , N 1 E 1
a ' 5 t i kb a a Fib !
6 rt a
i its f t9 t_ y d`?r. q rat:
4f..41:
� rem .40
{ 2 -
ta
'
--• -
^`'c € "S4.c' 4 fin .,,, . ,
. ,, _-' . Y
. 2.s5 r fi F` 3 Y e' f y
,_f IS 5 'y
ar: g '*tea �. .w ,
\ x n e'` i" • ::
r �h, y ' • .. ,may- " '�F �'q - ,a1, `• S
F 'k y`:x�„ ,. b°V r�9#'£`fis _ r''CF ., -r, -
x _ !4 •FJ7;14}dQ l7"§� a,,, ,fig t� , �
•
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD2 -XS12 (Riffle)
96.5
96
•
95.5
Ni °/. .
w
c 95
0
R
d 94.5
w
94
93.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance(ft)
Ground -Approx.Bankfull -Floodprone Area

I ii it 11.Pi lit\I 11 1 1 i ' 't'--- . "i-v:7141 1,F'17 ,,,L " ' !(-'1 ?'.i ,--.-.,
ti iz
'''.•'
•
r — \. y
i {, ` y ''^ti r
Upstream Downstream
Reach RD1 -XS13 (Riffle)
100.5
100
99.5
7-1",F 99
c
98.5
R
d
w 98
- f
97.5
97
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Distance(ft)
Ground —Approx.Bankfull Flood prone Area

NI 1-, P E ._ t
1 r t-, - k�' 7 / { ��,�
kr ..:''''.Pe.:*_.2.:'r '. ,..,14* , ' ' '
r
114
! •c ::-.4-
7 �
at3
,1/444:*
l''''''.* -.-,,k,U1".-1' --..'5.---'#?:,-. '...,-,.-.71,44:4f-.Z=..17r-;:. :--,-,-7TX:,:-. ..:-.il'.-,..;.-.
,.� �f iqy�
;�4 .1,a''n��.l�°t L YS` � �F } �-�� I
Upstream Downstream
UT to Muddy Creek -XS1 (Riffle)
101
100.5
100
99.5
w 99
.--.*.\\\
0 98.5
R
ru 98
w
97.5
97
96.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area

t1 //u
- — 'C. f�, k
\ '-Ik
'.,` 1 • tiny
r _a'- ;A-.-.',.:'.'-_-.am �-' ?,= _,;+, , b",4 t v �.M
. �
' 4 , �. 'i_ aYK�* i� .--` A ,_ [ 'r. `" • apt �� - _
Upstream Downstream
UT to Muddy Creek-XS2 (Pool)
101
100.5
•
100
99.5 •
99 -
w
c 98.5
0
,1 98
w 97.5
97
96.5
96 r
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance(ft)
Ground -Approx.Bankfull Flood prone Area

1 r cc? :
4° z
f j#ti
✓.�: y I 4 s .�� ',` *:"'
a 1 Ei/ 1 k ;� -+" , " ?! I 1 s 7 - tu " 1 is �,' + a ti , ,,. -Y rk-k zit ., � : _ - ! -,- y,4 1 Y -, w 3 —' +fix „'d4< ��/��� � ' 8a
•
� ,, > '% an-
w r,
--.: . t iy iv e ' •t ,. ,:,
Upstream Downstream
UT to Muddy Creek -XS3 (Riffle)
100
9 .....---""..-8-'""..m..............\\\i‘........"_
' D -
15 20 25 30
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull —Floodprone Area

a '�. = .z
x 1 1:� - -..use .� r A , :z"'"° "! `k ffi-.
E. - z .' - �'# �*"rc " " ' two ' 1 _ r - `` -
. . . „...._,,..-„,_;:-.;.-...,... . A„...i. 47.0..,..,,- ..,?,-;...,- ,::,-..,k;. .,,,-
- . . .
• .
. .
may_ f 2. :It_
\\
{ _ �-� -, i .4 .. a
Upstream Downstream
UT to Muddy Creek-XS4 (Pool)
-too99.5
99 •
9 8.5
w 98
,./.'..6
o 97.5
j 97
d
Lu 96.5
96
95.5
95
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance(ft)
Ground Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area

Appendix H
• Plan Set

c N. r
lmiipmE ,
FEED AND SEED MITIGATION SITE ores
;� Gard.E n
t 1
t _.a1.:n Mill• RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
_ ,� Engineering Services Provided By:
-- CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN . H U C 03030003 Angler Environmental LLC
License: F-1428
itF E B R UARY 2020 SEAL
1
, ei.„., .,
_r.. P�viarwx�c1 urdl FP#
��35
G1€nvla
F RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LLC
or 'Izi 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
No r,1 r: x RALEIGH, NC 27612
:
t,
Lei, t
S�
PROJECT LOCATION ''_'°- jar**
VICINITY MAP
NTS
/
W
`c� Sheet List Table
-, iie
Sheet Number Sheet Title
k...,..,............ -,,',f 1---
rc---) c - COVER H- CD
,,,, Al OVERALL AERIAL 1-
\ �, 0 0
,„ A2 OVERALL AERIAL 0_ o
=/
�� E I GENERAL NOTES o
�.\ ,> -� LEGEND
��\ V E2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1-
8, E3 EXISTING CONDITIONS o
0 \. (..)
a . - .\ S I REACH RD I o
.\ 52 REACH RD I 1-
Know what's below. `, 0
Call before you dig \, 53 REACH RD2 z
S4 REACH RD2 °0 Q
s 55 REACH RD2 0 0 2
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR I (7) w in
iPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DIGGING, OR EXCAVATION THEf----- 56 REACH RD2 di
I fl
Q_
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND -\ !c t i 57 REACH RD3
UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS THROUGH \ - \ `.
THE AREA(S) OF CONSTRUCTION, WHETHER INDICATED ON THE PLANS ` -\ jl ` �': So REACH RD4
OR NOT. CALL "8 I I " A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING OR \ - --/ 52`Z�
EXCAVATING. REPAIRS TO ANY UTILITY DAMAGED RESULTING FROM �� S✓ REACH RD5
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE C�
CONTRACTOR. , ; :: •,�
sop �� _ S I 0 REACH RD 6
IV I MAINTENANCE PLAN
�G� ` ' I IV 2 MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT DIRECTORY Z ' '
I P I PLANTING PLAN
���� P2 PLANTING PLAN
DESIGNED BY: 4 qy '
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC ��� ,� \ , ; ' �; f I FENCING PLAN
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 F2 FENCING PLAN
RALEIGH, NC 276 12 � '
57r
i
D I DETAILS
SURVEYED BY: �� ✓ �n�
WSP USA, INC. - D2 DETAILS
28 TALBERT RD. 1" 1 D3 DETAILS
SUITE A '
— / / D4 DETAILS
MOORESVILLE, NC 28 I 17 h
�7 m i ,
e
/ /
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW-20 1 8-0 1 637
RFP #: 16-007242 ir
, /
2`
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
i +�.: �� rn / PROJECT MANAGER: MB
) / DESIGNED: SCF
m , / / DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
PROJECT TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS // SHEET NUMBER:
PLANIMETRICS SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BY WSP USA, /� /
INC (NC FIRM LICENSE NUMBER F-089 I , J. BRANDON
HICKS, NC PLS L-52 I 9), DATED JUNE 3, 20I 9 SITE MAP —
NTS
J \ J

f 1 r
0
\ res
Feed and Seed Project Credits `v '
Proposed Mitigation \
Reach ID Mitigation Type Length(LF) Ratio SMUs \ .' \ \
\ \ \
RDl-A Restoration 400 1 : 1.0 400.00 v '
RD1-B Enhancement II 337 1 :2.5 134.80 \ \
RD2 Restoration 1,949 1 : 1.0 1,949.00 \ \ 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
\v \ \ Raleigh, NC 27612
RD3 Restoration 206 1: 1.0 206.00
Main: 919.829.9909
RD4-A Enhancement II 61 1:2.5 24.40 \ \
\ \ www.res.us
RD4-B Restoration 114 1: 1.0 114.00 v \
RD5 No Mitigation 119 N/A 0.00 Engineering Services Provided By:
RD6 No Mitigation 157 N/A 0.00 \ — \\ 1 Angler Environmental, LLC
Totals 3,343 2,828 200 \\ \ \\ License: F-1428
\/' \ SEAL
\ 1
\ 1
\ 1\
\ \
\
\ 1\
\ \
\ \
\
d' LCE KEACh KD3 ,e77-
LCE v \
\ � ��
�� LCE N
�G\ ,-,
\�\ ILEAC h IUD I FULL SCALE: 1"=100
/� LCE , (ii 0 100 200
�\ -
IiI Bch 4 .N \' _•
�. 2„ FULL SCALE
„ , _ 1 HALF SCALE
C� \\\ ; :.4e.••wry _r ,
U � \ \\ LCE �v,i e),, \ 1
// \ ?or e,- ....9 4,,,, r H
YI ' ', LCE \ (( Q
^'•\ .� -1 `\ LCE ��
N
`, \\\ a ✓/,-�. // __/ y ---• LCE '\ CO -I c i
, \ 7, ' ***. '---)._----. ____—_—X ---—r.) '4 f.-0, %........._
/ k'AN- ..,,
r , .
,„ ,N.„..
iLtp
. .-*S7: , \ (..)
\�_� / \ l// cn
\II . 1[I''
A)t �� _ cam^ 7 O
friitE14 kJ
�' .(%�� ILEAC h IUD 2 �,� , C? v` o
: .4-er) , , , re,-).
0
• ‘ 6 7--------------go 7
( , ------
/r).
• �., �-1: ;/ �0 ��, ILEAC h IUD 2 4', v__;;, ° Ct
11
' J �/ / \�\ / ' `. i • • cn Q
r
\�\ ` •:fir-. ,..,;. ;. 0= CC 0_
A
�; (� �'' ILEAC h KD4 ���y ,r
�► '� goy p: Q
' J ��� in
\_____— gal H 0
u)
CO Z U
O
g3, 2 J
8
eE , • . H O W
w 's _ —
o J
co 4iix",0
W Z
W DW
7-5
a) ,.' \.a .sue J
A �� LLI
z WW O E
Art'a)
{ 0 �Q/ Q
cc
z / ! , ,
irliiA o_ 0
o
r4'r11' '4
f
J
N ry
n ," \ . - _ ,'1Lr' r ,.,, '' A .f. 1 .y \ �• y rw PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
a, 1% J- •' . -}.0 �, . +� ,a „ , ' PROJECT MANAGER: MB
Q o \ y +n :; • �. i a k „�s.. cY. �a ,., <I DESIGNED: S(:F
> % '- tn. !a j' 4. .,5..;404 ' •' DRAWN: SCF
- ,J4, \ : i � �� ,j / CHECKED: AFM
cc • �\ a . „� J SHEET NUMBER:
w ,t` j�y
F� '• `$ �/.'o' --. __ ,.. .`. -` . LT C .. .}t _ - /
;), ,.. VA
•
J ` J

f 1 r
Ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
•
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
7---
Engineering Services Provided By:
„ Angler Environmental, LLC
•
License: F-1428
fil
SEAL
.11144‘ " ,
, hiqh,E-L
. ',.:..\: s' 1^ .f.t , f****8444k •4
v.,... is fF •
; Yam IT `
a
" .Piktit1Ys $ ` � .a1tk- ce z N`
. Ilk
t
iiiillOtit
llwtu`tdr. ., :ks}� xt4 �*\r Yti 1 4 � i C
alp 'a�1
r4b
ILEAC h IUD 6 ; ,' , i�' a ; , , 5, - 4 - t ��- ,: � '
J, . Vr.. .' ''� •,7' y'�" ,� :, FULL SCALE: 1 —100
• +C' ` .: Y• , w ` :`' - :- -¢z, ° , t M 2" = FULL SCALE
w % <'°t, �. • ;: r. �c ,;'.' • '^. ,,�,i �• , 1" = HALF SCALE
y
( '..,.. .
LLI
O\ Q
�� O
J �
Lu � �� 0_ co
Ct
x.• 7�' J 0
' 4---, ,,,4,.., ..„...„ ,,, . . ...
i r
irlit .
if 2lest ILL
y S.l• , � ` 1 P+a ��3 \ �S {i?h r} tyfy 1 .
1:-:f: , (_.)
Ct
A ,.
p Vit sr ,,,
. .,, .,, , ,,,, .
. , , , ,
, ,,,
,. ..
„,,
, , ,.. ,
M
A. '\ " 7.;. : :dam , + . ..��i'!.. \ x.. { •�,\ , 4 , ri ..IiP' ,s, • '' .. �C �l� 1 � ��r 0
j 11 , to { • \., v:,1041. �1, �, b- i:•"1°L-r ' -T i.,,'` 1 ,. E �I Z
.t,
rrc R`` i . ilitTifriii4 ›-
'` 4 r'-1 '-4 ., , t y4,id- 1'• •i �,
•
\''' \
OLLCC
Ct
,,,
Fw it:.1:; ' : ...* • i A.
3. \ ' a. Y #}�` llt. ►� �s� { Q
l' 141
.!I'll‘k
7' r`,•'v. ` .Y. 7.-'_' •
`\ ` / 3 - k� Tit R .. —
�; . Z 0 Z
ii 0
t• , !,„, ,., ,....„,„ i I.-- t ' ".....,,‘.\t'..
N k 4 �` j J W
�y,,�
11414/141:-
" 'l 1 ' '( •:i{Ty // '• T. „\� p,i�� \ j\' "`j iSi
:I:
«• rR \
),,,,,,, .
' s ` ; `�t • Td. \ f L' . + . F :1.
jivi—di
_...,... .
_ s , .
, —,L,.., . , .
.... „ . ., , .
, , q. „ ,. , ..„.,., ,
1y •�,�..
i4in
ILEAC h IUD 5
t�! * �\ �, 'r 4 r�: , �' p 1 �=*'tit :\\., . . R4P.s t\M1J.�. fi 1A v
C �� yi.; .,�^_ jM J v +t , t .,`, \a ? la, ♦, `,1 i 1 ' I. ''. '. Cr) r:
Ids �#, l t
cO ��•.", i 1' ` ' "' a te\ " 't' 1' ,�„• `t, , ` A '\ • '; ' 'C ,`. ..I.. �j, - \•.'t ._ - :� �x i�.: 'y ��R' 64614 i 71..„„2:
'. `. ..�"._, t
At•
d y� • -'S Y Si f
1filillit
p r .. ,-,---,
Q
Et
in L r ' i r t M\ �`W ^I,
•
1
•k • 0
J
in Z
Et
i ._ ,- ,_ , ktlii\•\ .
LLJ
•
0
0 Y } 0 0 O
w Q v , ... �t, , L.
ti�� >ti W
in 0
w .-,' : • '''''s. ' \ '-•.1,\, 1. . - . 't i=
t r. �. O
0= Et 0=
t z 0_ 0
U
N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
Tro
o PROJECT MANAGER: MB
DESIGNED: SCF
o "
DRAWN: SCF
Tro
CHECKED: AFM
cm
u)
o°'c SHEET NUMBER:
L
Lii
z A2Lu
_1
LJ_
A. ,f
J ` ./

f 1 r \
0 res
LEGEND
STREAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR — —50— — 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
I . ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT CROSSINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
A DRY CONDITION VIA OFFLINE CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIBLE. PUMP AROUND OPERATIONS EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR Raleigh, NC 27612
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP. PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR (50) Main: 919.829.9909
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR www.res.us
2. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM AT THE END
OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY W W W W W W W W W W Engineering Services Provided By:
THE ENGINEER. WITH APPROVAL, A PUMP AROUND MAY BE ALLOWED TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY IF THERE EXISTING WETLAND W W W W W Angler Environmental, LLC
IS NO FORECAST FOR RAIN OVERNIGHT, AND/OR THE PUMP APPARATUS IS MAINTAINED AND License: F-1428
MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY. ---
EXISTING STREAM SEAL
-99----
-9i----
3. CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. EXISTING TOP OF BANK -----TB TB TB—
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK ---- BB BB-
4. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL WITHIN AREAS THAT ARE TO BE CUT 9" OR MORE BELOW EXISTING
GRADE. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL IS TO BE PLACED ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN BENCHES. PROPERTY LINE — —
5. STRUCTURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS (AS INDICATED ON THE EXISTING FENCELINE x x x
STRUCTURE TABLES) USING METHODS DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL SHEETS. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING,
OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER ON INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES. EXISTING GATE x x
G. SUBSTRATE MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE BED OF ALL PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS. SEE EXISTING TREELINE
TYPICAL RIFFLE DETAIL SKEET D4.
EXISTING TREE 0
7. UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING, INSTALL STREAM BANK STABILIZATION, INCLUDING EROSION
CONTROL MATTING, ALONG CHANNEL BANKS.
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
8. FILL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DIRECTION OF THE
ENGINEER.
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF CHANNEL - -
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LCE
FULL SCALE: 1"=
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUGA 0
(SEE DETAIL D2) /
2" = FULL SCALE
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION 1" = HALF SCALE
S ,
(SEE DETAIL D3)
w
STONE TOE PROTECTION mossmosso Q
(SEE DETAIL D3) 0 N
I- o
O N
J Lo
LOG SILL co
(SEE DETAIL D3)
\\ Z
0
I-
U
ROCK SILL D
(SEE DETAIL D4) fl
cn
0
LOG VANE U
(SEE DETAIL D3) fl
0
U-
I-
0
LOG STRUCTURE Z
(PROFILE) '
OC >-
0 O 11
u_ Q
ROCK STRUCTURE z0 0
(PROFILE) w J
W
W W Q_'
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
(SEE DETAIL D4) '
Q
Z_
� J
Z
co co 0 ULLJ
o
<co LLJ
H
co
Q
H
~Lii z w
1
0 H 0
In Z Z
co WD J
co
(n O Q
0 0
LLJ
a Q = Z
U w
LLJ 0 _ILLJ w
z w i
a)
W Z z
L_
U ct
z
0 a
0
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
°
cm PROJECT MANAGER: MB
_° DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
0)
°
cc SHEET NUMBER:
L
di
Q El
z
w
J
LT_
J ` J

f 1 r \
1
1
1
1
Ores
\ 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
1
' 1 Main: 919.829.9909
. \ www.res.us
1 Engineering Services Provided By:
1 Angler Environmental, LLC
'- \ License: F-1428
'' 1 SEAL
1
1
1
1
1
I 1
1
\ i \
WETLAND WE
G
LEACH KD3 - \ / ��� ft‘k‘
/ / \'
WETLAND WB
� ss /
�� \\\\ \ FULL SCALE: 1"=100
\ ., GP- ' / SCE// / ��� \� \ \
/ / \
�/// \ - - / / / / /� '� \ \ \\ ��€ WETLAND WC \ \\\\\\\\ \\ \\ IIIIII\II\ \ `� 1„ = HALF SCALE
WETLAND WD .',,' v v vv 1
7- / , \ rXr���- c 1,.-------,, \\ ` \\ IIII I
illILr, I \ - ,e- j r \� \ \- �S\ - _ -� E ����� I 1� \. \ \\ \\\ \\ \\I 1 I 1
II 11 � � /- _ 1 _��� � -' _ I �_ \ \ \ \�� � ' I I 11 � 111�`� \\. I �� �\1 \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\` \ \
I I II I I / �, - _ ;- \\ \ \ \ \ \/ //' - _ 11 1 i
�11\ \ \\�\\\ ; I,�\\ \ \ \1 \\\ \ \\\\ 1\ 0Eli
\ I \ II 1 \ 1 111 / - �_. �. may. /'/ �- \ mac �\, i II I ��� �\\�\\\ \\\ r�� h \\ � \ \ \\\ \\\\ 11\\\\\\ \ Q o
\ 1 \ 1 � �/ . - _ � \ _4- -N,- _� _ 1 \\ \\\\ \\\ , r \\ \\ \ \\ 1\11\ \\11�,\\ ' \ LEACH IUD I N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ms � 1,,, �tya �49��\� \ - - - - - - 1 \\\ \ \\\\ 1 \ c� \ \\
tre*:
\ i \\\
I I \ 1 \ ,� ../If \_ � x - — - I 114\\"
1 \11 l \ o
I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � .4. \ _ �4 _ _ _ J / III III \ \ \ \\\\ \\ \\\\ -
• I \ �
1 / 1 1 \ 1 \\ � :<,q a \ - ::. - - \ \• - , - 1_01_
- \ - - _-- -\// _ �; _- _ • // I I I1 1'l ` \ \\\\ \ \\ \\\ ', �,/ 1 \ \ 1 \ 1 I \ ``� t" ,tea' ; \� f \ - - - - - - - - - _\�_�� _ __ ;_ ��- � J lji11 1111 II\l \., \\\ \\�\\\\� \\ fl
LEACH KD2 / /�46 I -- _ - - - -' _ \ 11 \ --....N. 1 I// I / I I \ 1 \ \ \/ I *?� - - � \ r - \ - - \— _ - - - — -� _— — — \\ \� — _ �/J I 1 1 \ 1\ \\ \ \ \\\ I
%/ �/ / ///l� .l l 1 : I / / �✓ 4c# 4 �N ---.� — 3� - - - - — ��:�ii // / � I\\I\`\ `` \\�\ �� l I I l / jlll 11 lo
in. IIII / / / // / /�� `� � � __ _--- �\ a—� "�"_ —�" _ _ _ � - \ _ � _ __ _ ��;' y�l II1 \n �\ ! IIIi/ / / /// /i /1 / 4e I �'„, —, _ — — \��i - _�� 'a ' ^'„ 36'''4 '�\ — - - �/ i / 11 :::\\I
\\ \ l 1I / ( / ( / / //1 I \ I I // / / /' I j /�tt�i�� - - - 4 \ _- \\ ,, . _ \ ` — _ - - -- _ _ -___7 t� l k-d \ I I II ( / LL
/ / / - ` \ 4 \ \\� \ � \ ,�_ - - _ - - = �3 /\/ / \\ 11111 I IIII 1 I H
\ \ \ I I I ) / /. � r,J, p '`'� -� _ = _; ' _= \�\\ \\\��\� mil - \ , � - - -�- _ _ � - _ _ _ ` \e /�/ �� _�� yk �\� \ I iI II II I III � I II I , o
I 1 \ III / / / / .2 .� _ _ - \ \\\\ \ _ _� _ ° _ _ _ - 6 �c �/ //;� r \\ \\ \ \ III \ z
1 1 I 1 I /,,____*--- .> "��'' ' _�— - Ar - -- ` v�v� v� - — - �' � ,� �� / �,,;� _ - - 4// t%�\r r Iry \ VA\\ \ VA\\ \ \�
1 I I I 1 = -\ ` / �`` � ��� i J� � � \� _ \ -- \ \\ \ 'sue � \ \ `�� �j�. � .� _ � J ,` e � � r� r \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\\\� \\ \ \\ ,
—AL
Ivl O / ! I I ( \ ,�� � �/ ���w�. v\� vv � — _ � v ' � �w�v � v�vv — �—,_ — / ik r r ��r \A \ \ VA vrv\\\ \A \..- v\s._ o�
I Q
N I I _ v >> - - v v� �_ �wvvv � ? =--� - �v� ii,,, k r r� k I \ , \ \ \ \ , o z
I,� >/ �' \ / / \�- \ (\ \ \ \- -\\ \ \ r \�� \ \ , _ -;pp \ ,. ; \' _ r r r r�1 I N\ \ \ \ \\ \ , / ,/ z w
I ( / ,A1 _ ms � / / / � - �� \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ \---
1 \ \ � � _ f�- e uB� e I \ \ \ \ �— �_ '
FAI��/ POND � �� �ti — _
/ter, \\\ \ � \ _ _ f � r \ \\\\ \ \\\\ _ _ Q
/ / •l � fix, / � ' _ \\ \�\\ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \ \ �= ` —� �� 1 r� \ \ \\\\
\ \ / > J W
�% � I 1 a, / / o \ \ / / // , — �j� N \ \\ \\\\\\�\\ \\ \A \ /i% /1 — \\ \ \ \ \ +` I r \ \\\\\\\
\ ,'
/ / // // V
� \� / // s \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \ U, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,\ \ ���\ /
i ' 1 /I / / `ki / i_. / / / �1 '*'� i ' / \�-7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \'<\\\ \V 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r , � k� \ � _ '( _ , ,\ \ �� , TEACH I�D2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \`�\\ \ \ IIII //;- - \ ,,_kCk r \ \ WETLAND WA Q
,, ,........ ' I/ j 1 1
\ 11 \ \ II �3 \ \\ \\ \ \ \ N rr � r � \
I Ili / r\_ \:),,_
�, \ \ 1 I I / I ) / / _ _ \ \ \ \ (r r ,
1 / I I � > > I 1 \ I 1 I I ��, �/ � �, ,� \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ ; - \ \ \ \ ram ,
/ 1 /l I 1 � \ /�, ' \ 1 1 11 ' ll/ / I I I III�i`,I7i// -\ `�\N \ \\�\\\� - \ \ \ \ �� r' , / I- 0
/ I / / ;// �4 \ `�- 1 I WETLAND WG ' / I 1 I I // / / / / // �4 �\\ \\ \ \ _;\ \ \ \ r ,1
/ , / / It /e k /.
kr /; / / / I / l// ///l/ I ll�f%,i %' ' i \ \ �\ � � ��3\\\ \\�\\ \ \
/ /
Q
/ / / 1 — \` \ \ \ / REACH IUD I O z
o / / / / iI, k \\ r : C k 0//,7// , . /�i / 1 / 11 /� / //��� ' \\�\ \ \\ \ \� ,/ — 2 p
<> ) / \�� �,�� rI, / / / - - / IIIIII \'' '% %''' REACH KD4 \ \\\ \I\\`� / p o
v v 1 y .� ////Z/� ��� -- / z z
Hui �2______ ___\ g22—al, WETLAND WH '—%'/zyz ,- O
0 1-
zx
w z 0
/' w D z
oc''' /z Z 0 0 U)
6 / Q 0_ W
WETLAND WF - w
J w
ow
co /' _1 z w O i
in 0
w Li- Z z
U
Z
N .
O '
a / PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
87 a
/' / DESIGNED: SCF
I
DWN:/ CHECKED: AFM
SCF- SHEET NUMBER:
/
di
E2
z
w
/
LL
.,. J ` J

f 1 r \
/ 0
0 res
/ 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
/ www.res.us
/
Engineering Services Provided By:
/ Angler Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
i
SEAL
i/
/
i
1
' /
I i
i
I
RACK IKD6 i /
i fl‘*‘
-/. 1 / ram � - � .i'
\\v// � /- �•
� \' � - - FULL SCALE: 1"=100
��
_ _ tr----C� 1
� i- �-- i 2" = FULL SCALE
�� ` 1" HALF SCALE
v
‘C‘`''‘ D •
-- _- ___---.. • ) a Q
\ •
Z
O
.3));
OD
I (/ i q //' rI
/___ _ 1) Igl / / /;//0, 0// , ', ,
// / / I, /,/,locj//,, , z
O
_ ___ 1 f ( ( 1/// HI/mull )),
• ) \ i \c„_1 1 i f /1,(0/1/, ///7//o , ( ,., ..„..t // 4til . _ u_
1 III l// ///(i l/// + > _ v ?
/ I \i) A\\ \\\ L __-_____,_,--:-,_--_--___,—________-.____-- ____ ,___ ,-_-_-_ —_—_—__—_, _,_\___--.- -:. -w-i-—0,*,-- ,. _ .
/ I —...:_-- -- -• --- ,,
\� _—----- _ cc cc a
/ N_---___-- —_—_-- --____—__—_—____— — — -, ---------
/10
=_=____ _, _ REACH IUD 5 Q
- - -jam-=_-z \\��\\� Z_
., ( _ __I .
Z Q
I 0 0 = z
i 0
0 i
a i H
co I - O p
i ~ Z Z
�1 I U
w p
W Z 0
W p Z
0 I p 00 I-
6
U 0 Q 0_ W
W diN p J J
in ~
Q W p o
1
ow Li- Z z
U
z
cc r o
U
cc
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o_ PROJECT MANAGER: MB
a
DESIGNED: SCF
2
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
i d SHEET NUMBER:
z E3
a
z
w
J
LT_
.,. J ` J

L \ — — — — — - _ - — — _ — — — — — — , ' / / — — ( ✓ — — i / / /
,__ ____ ____ ____T____ :
/
/
77
--__T- --- ,
// / / / / — / ' / - - - - — _ _ — ' / ' / / /' _ \ \ - _ - - - _ _ _ - - - - - - ' — _ - - _ / / /)(XJ. // / / . EACN ' D I STA 0+ I 0 TO STA 4+02
77.6' ores
/ / / / — — ii1i1ii _i _ _ _ _ - - iT -i
— ' / /— - 1 .9' 1 .9'
/ — _ _ / / / / — / / �` 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
/ / / // /' CO T TO BE RE�lI�\fED FEND _ — — - - - - - /Q // / / J1BANKFULL STAGERaleigh, NC 27612
\(
' / / / ISP:sr
ED � �FF SITE _ I __-
_ � - - ' / - - - - - - - - / � O Main: 919.829.9909
/ ,/ // /// / / / / - - — / / / REACH RC — — — — - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ — �/ / � ' o www.res.us
�7, / / / -- — _/ — — _ — STA 0-i<2 TO 4+0�— — — _ _ — _\,_- '' — — _ Engineering Services Provided By:
v /' /' / / /'' /'' B�FP�R/l� TO BE RMB�fEC�AND i / / / //' y ' y — — • — y— / /s' Angler Environmental, LLC
/— — / / y Z License: F-1428
/' /' / D P.6SED OF OFF-SITE /- - —\ —y i — y ' �' TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
/ / // / / J � �� � � / y / � � \/ - - y — —
y SEAL
Y. / / /� / / / — y \ y
7/ // / / / \/ / // y
r;fi
\ — / J/ / y \
CV
/ :._, ds: //_�� y \ 00 9.o
______„_____:<_ ___
— — /)/( ____ — / —/'— — — / i` S53 �•Q?::•� \ \ /��/ //�� `,\ �\ _./' °�//// 1,,s::;wz`. — /,0 i/14 y \ y \ y �r--- ��^` ' / BANKFULL STAGE
fi
// / __.>.•
® Eo- =_r ••--- I / �l I �" / I.. �Y— ` /' i 9=-i / I yt\ 9 O -" / /4, //,,y_�^�� ���
, r ._._
,;,,;,,�,., y •ems ' _ _ 1
,,,,„::,.., • - 4110 <\,/
v.
d �. / AV A�1 °vim �����VJ�
0 /, •� \ _ �' ' - - _ — _ — _ _ —725— _ — -- - - \\\ \ \ \\ ei \ . ��, y / OI\ . l\ /��i
,,. / 51 y '-' — — -- _ _ _ - - - - — — \\ \� `\ �\\ �\ \ \\`� SXO O+ n 1 i TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION %
li /J/ / - - - - - - — L9i
t //
/ ' / ETL N6TiGB — 730 — ENHANCEMENT II illk \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ �a`�AIr ,—_ SX ,,`,)1 l \�/ - - - - - EXISTINGCI�P,NL�LELTOB; - - - _ - - - - - TA +02 TO 7 9 \ \ - � S� , '` -•
/ ' — — u�ANDOI€ -A�dD_B2CKFILL�6 — — — _ \ \ \ \ ....��':; I
/ — / / / — — — — — — _ _ \ \\ \\ �. 17::::1/...121— __I FULL SCALE: 1"=30
// // _ - -- -gE-E DETAILS- - _ _ — \ \ \ \ \ 'I I 2.0 6.0 0 30 60
' / / /// /- / - - - _ _ - - - _ - - _ _ - - \ \ \ \ RAQE PQIPd\AR _ "/ / . ' BANKFULL STAGE
/\\ / / / / / , ' — _ _ 3 _ \ \I SLyPE\ N
2" = FULL SCALE
/ / / / / — — _ \ \ \ / _ 0I Vz
/ 1 HALF SCALE
— — --- -_ _____ — ---- — , --_ --. — — ___ — \/ -\ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 / \
\\....____/ / / / , Z z , ' — — -- — — , , , ----2\_____\ \ \
\ ` , / ' � �/ /// //� /' /' / ; �-� � \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i I / / �� /- / ' o 0
\ — �4 / / / / // / / / — — \y 7- \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I / a�----���� ' / // / n TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION O
/ \ \ 4110 .i. ni 0_ co
— — J / //// /' V /' i� / // \\ \\\ \� \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ I L - 2/ O_
\
/
/
•/ ) ) // e'n7 / U/ _ / \ \ ( / I / f/ / /� ( / / \ I / ° / / / /•• � 1/ >/ y� / / / / g \ \ \ I i / / / / / / / / - H
_ _ ' ' / \ \ \ I / / / / / rn/ cam1 �/�,�- _ Z
, , _ \ � /\
fl
O
U_
I-
735 I 735 z
oC }
O rI
u_ Q
Z 0 Z_
Q
EXISTI\IG GRADE 5 w w
S
r CENTERLINEALONG TREAM cc cc 0_
730 I 730
SI Q
Z_
553 S2 1_ 53 w
1541 541 ~
m PROPOSED TOP
OF BANK S6 542 Z U
H _
co 725 ,' `, 725� \ ___-_ i—
w
Q I 77 -
EXISTING TOP _ O E
� \ OP BANK
I i 1
'6 ----N7--- \ -----Th'\ \ i
1 ` i Q
\ Z------r\ \\ __— \ -- N__________, / \ 1.11 D
fY
o TIE REACH RD I PROPOSED r I
Z =
a H INTO EXISTING CHANNEL BED _------ 0 0 di
W BED
- Q TIE REACH RD z in �
z0 INTO EXISTING BEG w w 0 O
N Li- Z z
z 7 15 > + 7 15 cccc r cc
`i w Q I o_ o
.o
o_ PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o
o O PROJECT MANAGER: MB
a DESIGNED: SCF
o
DRAWN: SCF
:Co = CHECKED: AFM
0)
U)
cc I i I I SHEET NUMBER:
w 0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00
_
w SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3' S I
J
L_
J I

\\ ores
`\ \\ `\ \� \\ `\ ` moo\��•�,'•, \ \\ \ � \ ' � / I
\ \\ `\ \ \\ \\ `\ i / •:� \ �25\ \ - - - - _ _ _ _ - / \._ ___ = �EAC N �D I STA 0+ I 0 TO STA 4+0 2
7.6'
\ \ \ \ \\ 0 \ \ \ \ ` \ /'
\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �' i0 ^ ` \ — 1 .9' 1 .9'/ /
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t \ \ \ - - - - - - rn / � -\ \ \ \ I I + 56 \ \ BANKFULL STAGE\ \ \ \ \\ / Irkj \ / / / I Raleigh, NC 27612
\ \ \
\ \ \ / I \ — J / I Main: 919.829.9909
\ - I 1 \ \� \ \� \ \ ��\ 542 - - . ���>2 \\ \\ \_ _ — — - - - /' // I i o' www.res.us
II I I /(,-:-
\ 1 �Q \ \ - - - - - — _ _ „ — J �/ i I Engineering Services Provided By:
_\\\ k/ — — — F \ / . I c_ Angler Environmental LLC
II I I I / I I I 9,`'-\J`��-t \ „ \' i I TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION License: F 1428
/ I \I\ \ I - Vi ).."'"‹.-, 1 h i
SEAL
I
I 1 _ _ _
I I / I ICI- - I ! �/ w\ \`\
9.0'
/ I I I I i a\ \11\\' S `/, v' \ \� REAC�RD I`' ' `� \ \ ; b I G.o' 2.0'
/2 I I I I
/ / I I I • l \ l _ \ V, \ \ hANCEMEN II — — ` ✓ I P
C
� V�
/ J
I / \ \ \ �— \ j`� STA 4+C TO 7+3Z' \ `\ I BANKFULL STAGE
* 7 \
/ / • .0, \ \ \\,:i.-\\,,,,,
/ // // / / / / i 1 . 7— T _� � \ _ �_ �QQ / 8-'-9t I b -
/ /
/ / // / / / // �O / O / / I\\�a 1 V' ($14.
I).i / �\-i //' \ =1-n_�_- _- /V� L-,��_J_ 1 b I
/
/ % -\.• / A- .4_ I -I) i'\ i 0) i
/ / - / / i i :-.. I \ / CO I TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
/Aso /// N_ ___.z V. Co ........._ ....„
9 V-- \ \i, - i
z z / / ....-...:::** ..:::$' -__ --- V/r__ 7 y
.,, , _ ________ ____ __,..„ _z
___, _ 7,,
/ / / z z /- - ' /wily .•
/ ' / / I e /'' II
I FULL SCALE: 1"=30
/ f // I // 72 / / I ri -aft 2.0' G.0'
l / -J - J_ � \\ -✓ / I 0 30 60
WETLAND W6 I / 1 / ;-:."c:""_'� / 1 BANKFULL STAGE
/ WETLAND WA / / 1
zy / / ��< / 41 , „./' — \� — .c \ \ — — I I 2" = FULL SCALE
/ / / / �f // \\ _� ; •' - - - �/ - - - - - - - \ \Jl l 1 1" = HALF SCALE
i / , — _ -
di
110 2,40‘ ----,6,
41: -.... -- ----77----"\ -.- \--.-- --",:* '. ---
.., lir"X ' ----;i' ,..iii': . \ / 1 1- CD
' - — \ l ' I _1
-s; i r 7 l V - - - - \ Lo
I - ^ / I (/ — - — — \ �
�l I, I / / -
---- /,----- ----- I
\ I I -- - - / - - - - \ \ I
Z
\ \ t ) 1 II
/ 1 I / / ___- -- -- - -___
\ . I I O
-- .....„.„... ,tt 17 ----- --- _- --
--.<' . "-- isoiras- ,•::* ,---- -- --- // -- -- -- ---- -- ___.
Ct
Ct
O
u_
I-
O
z
730 I 730 }
ri 0 Ct
u_ Q
z o Z
0 Q 2r�
J in
W W W'
725 725 Q
Z
in
EXISTING TOP ~ 0
OF BANK Q
c
IIFIZ Q
O
0
CO
0 720 720 Q I-
____, . ... s..7_______________7_, ----- -----"c\ \„(,, ------- --:::::-..... ---' - ---
co
rn 1/ IJJ
ILI N
w
co z
O L.1_
715 /**''''' w 715 0 0
g Q Z =
Q EXISTING GRADE 1
15 ALONG STREAM z Q
a°'i CENTERLINE �; 2 0 J
co + Q Q w ~
ZCD S H z w U- Z Z
CD
U U CC L.I_ CC
710ua710 o
o
a > PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
0 J PROJECT MANAGER: MB
o
DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
ZS
CHECKED: AFM
u)
o°'c SHEET NUMBER:
6E I I
di
5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50
z S2LLJ
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
LT_
J \ I

Pres
/ // / / //- /� _ / _ _ _ - \\� -// // /' / / / / - - - - � _ _ P // / / / / /�/�/ /\ ���A C •
\ \ ` \\ , /
�C- V // // // /�\ ���/ // / 7/ // //
/ 7/ ��5 // / / / / / \�, / \ \ \
�� / / / / / I \ _ . EAC N . D 2 STA 0+00 TO STA 5 +3 8
// / // / \ - - - � / / /// // /// /// / / / // / / \ / �il��I � '�� \ �� \ \
7
/ 7/ �/ // / \ —755 . / // � // // / / , / / / /� I I • I\\\ \ I
\ \l \ \\/ i \ \ / 4.8'
i / , / / /" \ \ / / i / / / / // / / / I I \a
_ _ \ 1 .2' 1 .2'
/ / / / �\/ + / / / _ i / / / I .I� I e� \ \ �\ \ \
/ // /- - - -'/ / // / /�TB � ��� // \\ / // / / // J i � � ice / / / / \ I �\�\ l\ �i��` N\ \ 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
// // // // � �-/ 00-r� �.z / / r / / — - / // // / �/ / / \\\ \\\\ \ > I•��` \\ N\ \ \\ \ 1 BANKFULL STAGE Raleigh, NC 27612
// / / �i i 9 F e\ _ � \ N �� � � /// / Ø\\ ì \
\ \� Main: 919.829.9909
/ / \ / / l- - \ /„ ;I'''' th) \ 11\\4. 40
/
/ / // / // \ \ /- - - / \ I — 9 9 Y:
— / / 4 > �� ' — 111 En ineerin Services Provided B/ / / -- / /�" — - - / \\. \ / / \ I / �� An lerEnvironmental, LLC
/ - l ) ' \ — — / / .:1�0 • I i \ I / \ License: F-1428
// // �,�'�/ ,-�' /F /.. J \\ I\\\ / \ \ , , / .. / / \ �� �� 400 ; , ' k / \ TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
/,- / ' -' / // _ — — , , �I f / \ // ,t // RE Cr1 RD / �� I j \ SEAL
/
/ls ( i *\\\\V C.C.
/ ,.. ---' /- ,V V V 9 / \
- / /:-��/ / - A - - - ' / - �/ I / �� /;
/ �/� / /� , / // /� // � / 5 1 I f/ — \ 745» / N � �/ 40 \\ //J '‘ \.Ir-11IF
/i/ V \ \ P3.5' 1 .0'
21V
-0i/ / ,�/ F // 751 5 S 1 7 \ \ I / `y - - ow_ — 523 / \ � � / �, N --1 1
F / / / I I 1 // , — '" �. - b ks
. :4 �— \. ►% A ‘:**;':'�``` e\�\� \ i \\, 6\\\ BANKFULL STAGE
`' _ — i / \ ... .� /144,�- -.S .._tt. ) / _ ‘it - \ \)( \07..---_4-,d, 411, Lot, \ --, ,/_______, -11--,--A ,�` \AW_is \J -
F , — F O jc �� �• —— �`��` 't",� / •I I, l"xv I—��L _�:Q���������\\\ /`�L. ` o `A V I . - .11\\<\/ljl•• , 1 —
/ F F i /I/�/ 5 16 ' I ` — — tir,. ��+ \.i_ \ ' 525 \��le-- cif;. 6\ \_, l I \ \
/ F /1 5 18 5.I l9 52-I 522 ` \/ °\
yI \\ .,�\ -- — — 26 �, < \ /yI1m./ IiIi' I 1 \ I 7, 745 \�� \� — \x\ \ . \ \ \\ \ �I /�� 0
F /� / \ \ \ N�' ` TYPICAL IGHT MEANDE C O55 SECTION
/ 0 / - - I I - N N \ \ • /
i 1 �i — EXIST N \CHANNEL TO B \ x\ 527 0
N o \ ' \� 4111,F _ — ' I i I, -> — —— — ABANDO1 E'D�\I�[�I�ACKFILLED N \ \\ �� 550 '\ \ /�— - — ` 752) 0 , / - - , \ EE DETAIL \ \\ �� \\ \ \ \ ` �t�� )c / //�
F / �.�� � — — — �\ \ — \\ \ N \ \ 4 ''"t-� . \ 10' 3.5'
• FULL SCALE: 1"=30
F F F l� �/ / 1 i\ \T _ REACH RD2 — \ \1 I,. �\ \\ \ � � \\ \\ \ \ \ 528 0 30 60
F F _ F _ _ L.._ _ /r ( I h 1\ \\ RESTORATION \ \ /1 \\ \\ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ BANKFULL STAGE
/�\ \ — _ e-\ — — -�, i 750 l II III I l \ O'�00 TOE+49 l�I I`i I I\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ e \ ``� ;/� `�% . 2" = FULL SCALE
=�e_——e__�99 = _ =� g _ — \ F �' /' X \\ �� \ \\ � �� �S \ \ \ N \ \ \\ \ \\•• N 1" = HALF SCALE< 1_ — \ •.
- - —� F _ I . I\ .' \ \ ,i \\ \ \\\ \\ \ \ �\ N \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \y\ \ -
_e 91- —\ � `� I / _ _ \\ \\\ \ \\ \\ \ � \ N \ \ ♦� \ \ Oa
\\ \ _-0 i \ \I I
MIL---- 9 - - ��\�� F Cb) chi j \ - \ \\\ \ \� \\ \ \ v \ \\ \\ X \ \ \ < < \ i \ i 1 I \ . w
v — o�I \\ \\ \ v v \ v A v v v \ 1—
��� — — — ,�r/ \ EXISTING PIPE TO BE REf\i •QVED \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ N N \ e , `. l Q
- — — — — — \ \��-=99 -'-i �LtD-DaSPOSED OF OFF SITE — , \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ �:•. \ o N
/ \ \ — \_ — — —I \\\\ \\\\ \\\ \\ \\ \ \ N N �\ \ \ \\ AN:-.. .1TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION O
- ` \ \\ � � \ \ ��\ \ \ \\�\ \\ \ \ �\ ,S0 \\ \ (0 \ \\ \ \\ \
0_ co
WETLAND WF \ \ /'_ - - - - - - - \ Irh\\ \\\\ \ \ \ N \\ \ \\ �� \ \\ \ \ ' z
\\ \, ,i__ _ \- - - -\,III \\\\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ; \ O
\\ ___ ---
\ /755— N \J\/ >I \\ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ illm\ \ \ \• \,� fI
1 H
\\ / \I \I •\/' —\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ z
0
fI
0
U-
OH
O
755 755 Z
. EACH . D2 STA 5 +38 TO STA 15 +60 '
EXISTING GRADE o Q
ALONG STREAM 6.4' Z Z_
PROPSSED TOP CENTERLIk E i z w 2
OF BANKI \\\ 1 .6 1 .6 w W
S 15 S 16 \ 11 \\\ BANKFULL STAGE w w a
S17 j \\ I I 01
750 I / \ 750 °1
SI8 \\� SIS z
—--- 1.So�o I 52I 4_ in _i\\\ 522 S23 TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION I— O
�' \ 524 (n fY
- __ z Q
�, --- --- -1 .50% \\\ 5 S 2 G U
>- i 7.9' 0
745 R -1 "�o% 745 P5.5' I .5' Q I-
1 1
\\ _ `3.a.. BANKFULL STAGE 0 0
0) 0
\\\ it \\, , -1.5C% - z
' r:
cci Iia, 2 —
_ PROPOSED \ I I\_` 0 U
i'-
.---
co CHANNEL BED ��, , ^� ^�I ,50% W z W
\\
\ - W
c'3 740 1 4_ (n O r
\ _ TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION U
o \ ~.
o \\ ,' I „�J,_\ z i
, „ ,
-�1 1-1.50%0 w O J w
t I 0
1 I _--
Q 11 �1 — - -1 .O 1 70 7.9' W 0 0
1 i U U z z
1- I V\ww
/� 1 .5' 5.5' O g
QII ,
z 735 i'— v 735 BANKFULL STAGE
I a
II
N 11
O I a). \
0
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
:Co
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
0
a DESIGNED: SCF
0
DRAWN: SCF
:CoCHECKED: AFM
0)
0
ccw
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION SHEET NUMBER:
w 0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
z S3SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
L
J \ J

,_,tr.3,- \ - — '
---- - — — — — — — — — — — — ----. / / ----t -.._.
— J / / \ u— _ - - ./ / / � -
- _ - - \ — — - --- - // / // Pres
— = - - - — �- 'r �EAC N �D 2 STA 5 +3 8 TO STA 15 +6p i .G' I .G'
\ A5— — — - - - - - - - -
__ __
_ __
/ // — — — — - 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
- - - - 411 — - - - - - - — 111 /
/ / - - _ - - - - _ � � BANULLSTAGE0 / / - - - - - — Raleigh, NC27612
— ' — / — A0 / + 03
Main: 919.829.9909
e\ — J/ — — — — — — �.4�\ ;\ // / N O' www.res.us
\ \ - - — 1 AT
\ _ _ —
\�1\\\ / �40— 1 \ / _ — W Engineering Services Provided By:
\ \> \ �� / -� — — �_ i - - \ — / / �/ REACH RD2 / _ � � � , � � ' � � ' � �� Angler Environmental, LLC
.. , , — — — ���JTT__----
RESTED fZATI O Ind-/___ ___ _ _ - ' License: F 1428
/ — — — \\ — / — — _ — — — = TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
-T.,. -,• ----- --rD _ ___ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - � , - - - - \ 0+09�CS 19+49 //- - _ U SEAL
-__ z c3
_ 2
-
o\ \� _______
\\ fo, / / — / — ` — ♦ �_ \ \ `� � � � - - - - - -/// // // — � i � �3C�� _ ice ' 7.9'
_ _
i.
�� 528 � ,�• — � /:•:-•-•♦ \ 529 e, . �� b
WTL�<Pd[SWD P . ' 1 .5'
i . _ — - - _vik /
�' - - /// a ----- ------. / � � / /// / / / / -- � BANKFULLSTAGE
memme.....__••_____• _ ...•":.-.:'.1-'.M.::1-1 I'..--- ----- AilliblW_ ....:::i; ., ---------- ---- -----
j`( .� — J V- -gl- - / ate _i �' � - / // / _
527
i _ t\ — � �f \ \ 1�., sly\� ;. \� Jd.�y. �'� '�- — // /
it, 1
\` -_ g� �� - / \ jam — A! N I� \ '• ','t.: —• \�' // f-...: \ / .e�♦ // — // / —
/ Cam/ �, � I /� \�� \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ so: / / O J / — 0 iA�
a> S � �. --d _/- - \ - - - - \\ _ ��. �_ \\ �O // , 53 I i3 532 5; . ,..44c ocTv::::::::::::: //x 4 / ./ ,� O• %-V _ �533= v � ' im v _ - - ':.:1"'' '_ = A TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
2111111.111 .
-AP" 0 --
�---is-- - III
��/ _-- „aaraz., ,,, owor,40$ - _ _ -0 , /‘_. ,.____ , -.\--,...-----6,6„ _..........._ ._ ____
; / — — — — — — ie---__
\ ��e\-, Nfilyier,<-7 . ,. / - \ \� <.�, - ` • \ I /
\�•'i;�.�;i _�i 550 / ` \ / \/ \' _ =— \\ �cL�sa�7_-.cTB -'� �. _ � j 1 -- -TB —T_ '
740— � — \ \\ - - \� \89 =�a—� /ee�R�,99 �_ � .d -ram _—ram _ 6: 7.9 ``
/�� — — 0 — — — ...... \ A \ ` — — �.\ _— —\ \ r ___��_=_� == B—_ tee— � � � �_-� ___5 --__e �1 al=` O N
I .5' 5.5 FULL SCALE: 1"=30
/ — — _ \-\ \ \\ \- / `�- \` of_— '// I ` �1 /� --ax—==a `� \ O
v
/ • / i / — — — \ _'� \ \ '\ / \ \ \ — \ ex� L9� L � /I _ _ _ �'�j� BANKFULL STAGE
526 ' /_ _ - - ' / / / _ i - - - \ \ / ` , \ \ \ \ \� � _ �\ \ \ ` - \ \ \ ` � � � _ _ — � � � - - - - - \ \ \ \/\ \ ._ )-T �\\ 535 \ 2" - FULL SCALE
/ - - - - - - \ \ \ \ \ — - - - - \ \ \ 1 = HALF SCALE
_ 40� EXISTING-P-IPTO'BERE�4QVED \ \ \ \\ - - - - - _ — _ — �\ \ _ -
, , � '�D DISPOSED OF_OFF SITE / _ - - - - � \\ \ ` - - - - - - - \ \\ \ \ `�\ \ \
1 \
525 ��- — _ - - - - - \ — EXISTING ChANNELTdE \ \\ \ \ ' \ \\ _ —735, — — — — \ \ � — _ 1 \\\ \ _
/� '� ��'� ' � 745— _ _ J ABAID8idE1SAND BAC F�IJ`ED\ \\ \ \ \ � � - - _ _ \ ` _\ _ 1 \ ` \ Q
// ZW — - -S€E D AIL D� \\\ \\ \\ \\ \ - -\ - - - - N
// // - - - - - - - - - — ` \ \ \ \=__ ``�'` - - - - - - TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
o
/ / \ - — —
, \ _ —745 N \
_ \ \ N \ \\ \
NN
opcHt
Ct
O
u_
H
O
Z
745 745 oc }
O Ct
u_ Q
U) a Z_
(1) w J
J w
w w r'
CC CC ci_
527
740 740 Q
S28 Z
in J
529 EXISTING GRADE
ALONG STREAM S30 H O
°' CENTERLINE
--- \ PROPOSED TOE S52 S3 z(Cr) Q
cn \ OF BANK 0 U
\\ ���
735 i ,\\V _ i oo- \`\ \` -
735 N
/ --- I \
cc
II r z Q
1 1 1 ' �` W W
11 _ W
o t I _ _-1-CJO% ��\\ - O
730 �i1 \\ ^ 730 0 U
- •
Z
U
A2 0 J u.i-0 N\-PROPOSED Q W ~
ChANNELBED 1- in 0 O
O z z
Q
, w
U Q
(1)Z_
u_
CC I2 CC
1) 725 I I 725
U
N
O
T
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
01
a
DESIGNED: SCF
o
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
01
u)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
L
ui
z 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 1 0+00 10+50 I I +00 I I +50 1 2+00 C4
w v
J
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ J

— — .. /, — \ •N. — _. / - - �_ — — — — - - - — — / _ — — - - / / ' \ /
/ / / \ ��/I Ir- � // // _ ___
- - - - � - - _ — / - I
/ / / � - - - \�_ //// // / — _ / — _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/ - - - - — J / / /
730— ' 11 ` �EAC N �D 2 STA 5 +3 8 TO STA 15 +67 p i .G' I .GI
— — — _ — — ——
Pres
— — — / \
S� / - - - - - - - / — — - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - l��
, ,,,,..
,_ — — — — — / � — - - - - - - - - - - - - // / 3600GlenwoodAve Suite 100
� � i
/ ii
0 - - — � IL IL BANLSTAG:ii - - - ii—:1
WETLAND-WC - - - - - - — 125
' ' Main: 919.829.9909
/ / STING #�Pd1�L TO B 1 IL
_ _ _ _ _ - - _ — — _ / / — / it o www.res.us
U - - - - /// / ABANDO�IE'D AND BA�ItCLED / — — — — - — ' // i� �' ' Engineering Services Provided By:
- — —/ — / — WETLAND WD — — /// / // EDETAIL D2/ ' // _ ge
— — — - - - ' — —/- I '� Angler Environmental, LLC
IL
— / // / / /// //// - - —/ / �� ' '�'����� - `` � — — — — — �/ TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION SEAL License: F 1428
C;3 , - - - - - , -
r ___ _ --- 70 7 IL IL --IL IL IL-- iLligri
- - - - - - � / �/ / / I �_ <a^��� --_�`L� / I 7.9
P
/ 4, _
,--- C:)
/
0 ..'' /
•
/ \ / / / — / / — / / -//� �Y/ 1 S�� o--MMMMMMk —\r \ Te\ ' /^. BANKFULL STAGE
;P 2>,Vi,
-':.:.t-,.--.--:-.,.-::•--?-
` \` —(1► , / i r` - �� - T ,�i-` / vim— _i _ --- al-_ -- O ,.:-1:1::.: oO/ \ 4' \ -- 538 \ \ 'C`S. /a>• '_ \ / ` m/ S_-5 li
./ - -T — ,a=tea- ----��- C — A. . 'J / / � ' \\ \ r ..:1:::. •°�..-•ac.Nr / 540
161----i9 --- -_,-77,,7_, -3.o2 O r ri ••' / / �•\�•sii:: / // _/ / \ \ — \ \
1.i�11•
_ — — — \\\ O \ \ xs / Q0 - ,. / ®, _ , •: . / " 2""�•• \ —\\ \ \\\ _ _ _ TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
----- _,/ 0----- a_..,,,giiii *,,Amio, ••,*61:: fiegrIMIN ------- N
";\ ,_
1p __— -- --- \„,_..,
\____ N , --.., •,..,_ .NA.:j 0 ,40 ,, \„,
‘0
AIF
---41__0- -_._...._,___ _--
` . A&l4vi?-.' 4ir_"t, -
-:::0:6110_.-1__--- .. _ -1.1__.-_ -___-- - _ \ rI .5
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
— — — \ / \ — \ 0 30 60
_ \ — — - - r // — — _ _ �FACh RD2� ` -- _ s \ \\ BANKFULL STAGE
1_ _ — \ - 1 \ � \\ 2" = FULL SCALE
RES�QRATION ,
- - _ _ _ — \ \\ \ WETLAND �VG _ _ i 1" = HALF SCALE 1\
-...„ .,, N 1 —73o-- , -, N 0, \
7 -Y! . ...- ___ .,
... -N x I / / ,,/ , .,
` — , \ \\ \\ \\ \\\ \ \ �� N \\ \ I ' // _ /____
\ \� � \\ 725 �C� �� TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
\ \ \ \ - _ \
�� ` \ \\ \ N \\ \ \ \ i/ / / / / / / � � � - - - - \ \\ \ \/
\ \ \ \ Z
` \ \ N \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ / / � / // / / -- - \\ � � \ \\ \� - - � � � \ \ ` �\ O
� ` \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \� \ \ \ /// / // //:/ // / // // / 735— _ �\ \\ \� \ \i____ � U
\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I /� / / / // / /� `\ \ �\ \ \ \ _ �/ \
\ —\ \\ Nam\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ it I / // / / / // - - - - _ \ \\ \\ �� �� 0� Z
/ O
II
O
H
735 735 Z
. FACIA �D2 STA 15 +60 TO STA 19 +49 }
O ct
Q
7.G' Z 0 Z
1 .9' 1 .9' _ Q
w inBANKFULL STAGE W w rI
533 535 0t °C cc a
730 730 o'
55 I EXISTING GRADE Q
-- 7ALONGST [AM z
CENTERLINE S36 537
W J
!-QQ% _ TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION L 0
cy) V _-
Y - -i , i -�` ____-- PROPOSEC TOPCr) r
can ��._� i ----- - --- `�'---------- OF BANK z Q
I 0 0
I 0 725 it co i I — - ` _ 725 I
__ PG.5' 2.0' <
ct
I�/I 00% �_a
�t �'�\ _-_ T BANKFULL STAGE f/
0
I j \--- _/ \ — C)
__
c,i
1 i
___________ ,________
_ �v I 1 T.Odd,, 0 7� U
'cT) \ II 1 1 l \� W L�LJ
Ld_
720 720 (1) O
o PROPOSED TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION Z U
o CHANNEL EED Q ri
7-5 w 0 CA
J
Q W 0 1-
Q 9.3' H W O O
® 2.0' G.5' W z Z
O tea�// Q
C5 715 715 BANKFULL STAGE CC Et CC
o
o
N
O Tn. \
Q
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
Tin
cm PROJECT MANAGER: MB
0
a DESIGNED: SCF
0
DRAWN: SCF
n c_ CHECKED: AFM
01
w
cc I I I I I I
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION SHEET NUMBER:
w 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 1 6+00 1 6+50 17+00 17+50 1 8+00
_ S5
w_,
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
L_
J I

/- - / / / \ / / / / / /L \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / /
- - - J/ - _ _ - / / /' /\ / / f I I ;717' \
, . \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ls \\ \ \ \ \ \ \•_ ,..,
- - � - _ _ _ _ _ - - - �, // // \ / / / I I I^, \ ,� A
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ / ores. EACN . D2 STA 15 +60 TO STA 19 +49
_ —730— �/ / /'� / / /1 !(� / \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / ------/0
_ _ / / / \ \ \ �,, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
'' / ''' � �/ \ / // �/ ,\\? s. \/ \�s iL \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ �^ / j - - 7.6'
....-- p I .9' I .9'
— — — ' '\'�� \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` — — 3600 Glenwood Ave Suite 100
\ \AtTLLN[A WA \ \ \ — —
/ / / a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ BANKFULL STAGE
I / / ` L L L I \ \ c3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ _ _ _ / Raleigh, NC 27612
il s' \ \ \ \ — 03
/ O Main: 919.829.9909
----- / / io / t//1//i.z,
/ www.res.us
—
G I I IVG ChANE-t TO BE I S �� //a / \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ — — — — /�I
/ Engineering Services Provided By:
_ _ — — — .,'• 1 10 P P N-D BACKFILLED — ,L / -' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ — — — '/ / Angler Environmental, LLC
0 !lir'
I ,�� 'L � L O �\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ License: F 1428
_SEE DE�A7C D2 / / �, \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ — — PICAL RIFFLE COSS SCTION\ REAChDI\ \ \ \ \ sL— // \ � /. \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \� \ BAN \ //1/
11 \ \ N N \ \
a / \ ..�� ��� — - - -/ i ,L\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ '- -\\ / 9.3
MIK
-IF /
s___. i
/ _9, —� 1 �11 -; /L \ \ \ 1 1
\\ \\ \\ \ — \ \ / BANKFULL STAGE
lig x --.. '>? _ - - -
_—- 0,,,,:7;;;:*--
`�.- - ��r- �\ Iv 1 +� /\\ \ \\ \ \ \x \/ /
Lz z c
/ _
.. QQ.,
_ / Ar-___—:_i_-.-_, v::::47.\3.,, 06 \GX x ,e___ __ , ,\'7 • 537 536 \ \ (.c\ -,==-___‘ ,_,.....-_ ___.: ,..,_ , \ N4 ,,.-
.. .71,-- / \ \)>/
,"..,�( =- / .:•-.:.�.:i•' • �� . . C 'AWN:.\ ` \\\\ \\ , ' Ate`\\\\
\ \\ 540 ' i\ \��5�� �\ 1 I \ / } /' TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
. . 'N \ \ ( V /
/
/ __ .. v - RE H RD2 / d�v�vv \\ Zvi v< \+ /, ��
' _ _ _- v 'v A RESTORATION \�v v \ A / 9.3'
0ea„....,,,,,,
pp,
_ _ / \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ 0+00 TO\� 9+49 `\ ` \ ,L �\ \ / // _ 2.0' G.5' FULL SCALE: 1"=30
I
\` e 0 30 60
\\ _ _ / \\ \\\ \ \ __ ,.,_ ,�j \\ \\ \ i , IL
`\ `\\ / v
\\ '/ / BANKFULL STAGE
11 ✓ /
_ \\ \\ \\ m�� S \\ \ \ \ iz �/ \ // �. 2 FULL SCALE
\ \ \ s \ \\ \ \ ,- \\ �„ \ / / 1 HALF SCALE
— _ \ \ \ ` \ \ /° '�\ V V\ \N.- / '�\1 rr
e.
' — \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 7/ \ \ \ JL TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION 0 Q
/
ice ' , \ \ \\ \ \ \ \� _ \ - - /
�2S \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ ��(,., Z
/
/ - - - \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ / \� •
/ \ \ \ \ \ — / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,_ — — — / / V
// i 735— _ \ �\ \\ \\ \\\ \\ - - - - - Jj_ \ -- \ \\ \\ \\ \ /, / '0 /
11
/ - - - \ \ \ \ \ \- - - - - //_ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ / / /
/ /i — — — \ \ \ \ \ \ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ /
\ \ \
/ - - - � \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ N\ __� // � � \\ � � \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ // / // O
—
11
O
u_
I-
O
735 735 ,
oC }
O Ct
u- Q
Z 0 Z_
() W J
5 J W
W W Ct
730 730
Q
Z
W J
1 538 H O
S40 (n fY
co EXISTING GRADE z Q
0 0
ALONG STREAMCO
0 725 CENTERLINE 725 ~
a LL N
I PROPOSED TOP H 0
OF BANK
2 > _
cc
co ,.------ w z Q
- D uJ
O
0 0
/ __ .1 i
co Q 0 O 1—
f--_
z LLJ 0 0
a
C PROPOSED _ - LL z Z
u_ CHANNEL BED TIE REACH RD2 INTO Q
0 EXISTING BED OF COC Et CC
7 1 5 REACH RD I 7 I 5 0_ p
U
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
Tin
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
Tin CHECKED: AFM
u)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E
di 1 8+00 1 8+50 1 9+00 1 9+50 20+00
Lu S 6
z
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
E
J \ I

\� \ \\ \ \ / / ° / /' /' / / ��, / /' ��J. /// _ ores
_� _►-_�ter_ '=� ye 1 r
J / \ / / ��ilitti� — /
J — — — /' \\ \\ 1\ \ // �' -, . /-- lg.. WO // /' irr�,� ;;�� , \ °= 'e!�/. . — — — — — . EAC N . D3 STA 0+3 0 TO STA 2 +0 6
ittos
7/ '' ...._
/ \ / / / / / 7 7 / �� WETLP�f�D W / / /�� �, %— — =� / — ' 4.o'
. ti,--
/ V/ / , / / / / / / \ / ' / / / ia,/ ,,_ ' /_/_.�.: /� , �?$- �% // / \ - ' / / — / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
/ � � , / / / / / _'' /g'\�� 1 / I / . / �' �''-- / ( / / / _ J� // Raleigh, NC27612
/ / i / �° i / BAN STAGE
/ U / / /' / / / / / irt
/ d / \ / /;� �: \ — �/ / / / / / /' 7/ 01 Main: 919.829.9909
/ / lik >- a / / / / /
z„...,,,,,,...,„,„
/ www.res.us
/ / i _tea,- - %• / — / / / / 1
// / // / , ,/ // / illt I i rl,� \ 1 ��\� 11110
/ / �� O _ _ — / // / Engineering Services Provided By:
7 °Ifr
/ / g1�\?l1.;, ,A 0 — — ,' Angler Environmental, LLC
fli
1 1 mr— . \Te / — _ 4_
/ / / \ -`� — / / License: F 1428
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
1 / / / /' / /' _Ci- REACI RDNI/ 94110,4114,
. �.''' c / / ' / /' ' SEAL
/ 5 (/ i / /--- r;PIII; / / /
/ /' /' / i' / / 90 �O 2+ 6 / / '�;' / //� ' � I % / 'r ow- ' /' / /' i �' / 4.7'
��
/ / /7 / �\ / / / / / rFil�if /!, lb . / 7/
/ / / / //
/ / — 1
/ / / / fr.'
/ / �� 1 ,_:, , ,; Gt5 / / / PBANKFULL STAGE
\ I \ / I I / /�I� 5I 4 / / / / / / 7 /7 —� —�
/i
I \ \\ j \ / J / �° I //(t///' / / ,/ V .
7/ / / Z // , — / /i
1 / -
N 1
\ \ \ r .,
„*, ,/:z-N �is, ,,,.....„____, ,, / �e ,'re•,„\,,\ \ 5 I 0 / ' 543 1 5 12....„-..,_.... ., kr,�* sir,„ ... /// / / /, , ' / /./ / -
70 ;
i \
\ ,
1 \ I I 1 ; �c a ,, , j Ste, .._...,/ -I-t�K.: / lit
/ / / / / , , ,...... /
--X. / /
I \ \ \ \ \ l �ii��, �� r �/� • , `'_ \— ��`. ��/; 1 / / / / / / / / �� / �' /� / 4 _���\
\ \ \ \ Z �%f' �e.. _' e _ ���'� / / / / i
� �� � I• /_ ° '�N� / /' /' ' / // /' /' /' S0// — /' TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
v \ Willi ogrillh� 59 y / / / / / / /
\ \ \\ , \ \ \ \ �•►' \\`.�• 9 - ag- 'cyleit %,�GG . / /4 .//� I / /. 7 , / / / / / / / /'' /
4 ' -- rgarrika 41\ s--t7/ l / / 41,
7 ,-____ _,- ,-
7- - - - 2
....„..._ ..........„
x N N xx x
, 7 ,
7
7 7 4.7' ''''''''...........!........__ ......••.-4114"k"
\ \ \ \ ♦ =1� �' / // /" / / / ^� / // / / �'' / / / FULL SCALE: 1"=30
/ / / / /
..i • • 1 / / / ,7/ ,-- /
W �� \ \ \\ \ \ N
\ \ \\ \\ \ \ �� N\ \ \ \ / °4/ / / / / / / / / / �� BANKFULL STAGE
\ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 10 \'i
l� / / / / / / j / \
\ \\�\X \\ N \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ ���•� / / .i „ .i
\ \\ \ �X \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ N • / / / /' / /' / /' /' /' O� \ \ o I` 1 = HALF SCALE I\
\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ *, ,,0\ / , •• EACI ' RD2� / / //' / �o / / /� � � / i� )
\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ ��E�'ISTIN� hANNE� TO 5 \ \ \ ' %� i \ / /' / /.� ' / / / /
\ \\ \ \ \ N\ N\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / /• / / / /
\ N \ \ x \ \ \BANDO��L�D AND �ACKF\IL�LED \ \ \ \1iI \ I , ���� / / / / / / / / \ \ / w
\ \ �2N N \ \ \ SEE D TAIL D� \ \ \ \ 1 :� �. n / / / / � - - - - \
\ \ \ \ \ \ E \ \ a / / / ' / / / / / \ \ \ Q
\\ \\ \\ \N \ \ �X \ �\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ II / / / , \ \ N
N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ S \ et
"���""" iIi / / / / / / /^ \ rn O
\ N\ \ \ \ ,- \ N \ \ \ \ ,� ,,; / / / / ' / / / TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION J
\\\ N\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ N \\ \\ �� \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ I / // / / // ��/�, \ \\ \
N N \ \ N \ \ \ N \\x \ \ \ \ \ \ I -, ,�Q I J / / / / ;; ,�, �� \ z
NO2 \ \ \ N \ \ \ �, \ \ \ \ < < ' + 1 / / f / / / / // I %-- \ 0
\ N \ N \ N \ \ / / --/�j /i' 1/ � /
_ / i\ N \\ \\ \ \\N \ \\ \ \ \fix \ \ \ \ 4\ 1 , _ /' / ,, ,I // / / % ; _ �/ / v
NN
\ \ \ N
\ o \ ��x \ 1ilk I I I 7141 I / �, 1 / rl
\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 ��x \ 1tkr / \ 0 / / \ /- 'J i I m
U
fl
O
U-
1-
O
750 750 z
oC }
O il
u_ Q
EXISTING TOP Z 0 Z_
/1 OF BANKLIJ
O U) 2_
()5 W J
S7 w
58 PROPOSES TOP w a
59 OF BANK
745 745
Q
5 I I 543 z
512 in J
'I—^ 0�/
--v - /�\ v J L.1_
co `. 1.50/ \�, 5 1 0 5 1 4 Z Q
co
LLJ 740 \ 1\ -I\-: ,5 740 I 1
r / 1 _ —
N F / t I .50°/0 // z
0 1 Z ' 1 1 I 0.03% 2 > I
I—I a 1 �, 1 1 0 0
= 1 I I 1 1i I
w z Q
80 735 1�`% 11� i i ' 735
�I / 0 0
0
6 TIE EAC-I RD3 11 Z =
U
INTOEXISTING BED TIE REACH RD3 Q Ci_
INTO PROPOSED EED 0 J di
co OF REACH RD2 < w Q i-
Q PROPOSED i_ w 0 �
EXISTING GRADE CHANNEL BED IU Li- z z
ALONG STREAM
zo 730 CENTERLINE 730 cc fY cc
0 a
U
4)
O
Co PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o)
_ PROJECT MANAGER: MB
o DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
o)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
w 0+00 0+50 I +00 1 +50 2+00 2+50
w SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
S7
J
L_
J I

I I I I I \ \ I ��\L \ o N \ \ \ \ \ Y� \\
/ / / /i I \ / / / I '
I I I \ I 1 I I '\ 1 \ '\ \ I ��\ \ \ •
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N
/ I I i I I I 1 I I \. I I I \ \x\ \\ \x \ \\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\
/ / / I II 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
/ / / / / / I I / / I I I i 1 I 1 1 '� \ \ \� \�: `\ N\ \ \\ Pres
\ \ \\ \\ `\ \ \\ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ J �EAC N �D4 STA 0+00 TO STA 2 5 +00
/ / / / o / I I / / I I I I 1 1 �. \ \ ��\.\�.``, N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ :N\
\ \
/ / I \ \ - .REACH h RD 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �I 5.o
r
/ / / / / / / I I I 1 I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ �, \ \
/ / I \ \ \ \ ,���� , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/ / / / / / / / / I I I 1 I ^,\ \ \ \\ N \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ N I .25' I .25' 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
/ / / // / / / / i I I 1 1 11 \ \ \ I \ \ \\ F / ` '��\•\ \N \ N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \N BAN KFu LL STAGE
\, / / / / 'l- / / / / I I I \ \ \ \ I / \\\: . � N \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ NN
— Raleigh, NC27612
/ / / / / / / i / / I I \ W TLAIND V1VG / - Gl ^.. �f1� \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ J \ Main: 919.829.9909
/ / / / / / / / / / / I I I I ` I I 1 I 1Y \ �/� I \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ N \ \ \N o www.res.us
7 ALA / / / / d- / / I I \ \ il!) \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ Engineering
/ / / / / �\ / / I I I I \ �•�`' �, `" ��\ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Services Provided By:
/ // / / / / / / / / / I I �. \ \ \ \ � N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �4 N — Angler Environmental, LLC
// / / / / // / // // / / / / / I I I5TIG Ch NNEL B- \ \\ \ _ii il:. \� `\�\ \\ �� \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ S\ g License: F-1428
// / / // // // // / / / / / / / �5ANIDONEID AN 5ACKFIL ED `\ \ m\��`� N\ N\ \ \ N \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ N — TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
/ / / / / / / // // // // / / I I 1 5 E DETAIL2 v \ I �'< \\\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \\ \\\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ _ - - sEAL
'' \�\ \ ' \ \ N WE`�LAND W \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \
/
// / / / / / // / / / // / / I 1 I I �o \ \ \ .� / I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - _
/' / / / // / / / / / / / / , ) / / / �� I \ \ \\\ / \ \ \ \ \ \ - 6.0
/ / / / 7 "'::,.�_ — • \ \ \ N \ —
/ w / / / / / ,\ �\. \ \ \ \ \
// // /� // / / / / / / // / / / / 04-A
/ / / / / / \ I\ �`�.'".•• �\\\\`\k\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ — P3.75' I .O' 1
/ / / / / / / / REACh / �. \ . . ,.`\�`. L \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ , `/ / / / / / / / / / / �/ / / / / \ �\,\ � ,� \- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ BANKFULL STAGE
/ / / / / / / /ENhANC ENT K / / ��` \<�^ •\ .\• F \ \ \ \ \ \ \/ / / / / / / / / / / / � __ ,,, ____ / • �\\\\\\. \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ �\4o\
7 / // // / / / / / SSA O 00 �O O / I / � �' \ ' ' �`/ \ \ `
/ / / V / / 1 \ F/� \ \ \ \ \ \
/ / 7 / / z I `� ��.� \ \ \ \ \ \
, ,
B-->- & \ \ \ \ \
\ \;• _
/ \�/ // y/ // // 7 / / / / / / // / / � ' � �� — m ! ' `rc�-��`' \/ 5 '����` � — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / Q / � _ — ` ,:, �. _ ���1-` `, \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �) \ \
/ / / // // // / / / / !. V_---- — — — — s—' 544 �1 ifoli 545 '::_c.4 ����:• . \ F \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ S \ \
/ / / / \ / // // / / // / / / �T��j �.� \ _� \ \ \ • \\�\ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ilia filIIII
/ / / / / — �1�= — S47 •� �,:. ��� � \ \ \ \ \ \ — — — - TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION III/ // // / / // /7 // / //j �'j =�_//�s� - - - _ 548 \�:.:, \ ��< �\.'�, A ''i�• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ III
/ / / // / / / /� / // r =,a- - - - - _ — — \ \ I ��I l 1 1 / 1 , . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NI
/ / `\\\\ k / // / /�.,' //= i� �/. ` \ \ REA -1 RD4-B I \ \ 1 I I / \\\. \ \\ \\ \ \\ 111I
�/ // / / / / % - - - - - - ESTORATION \ I ��\ / \ \ \ \ \ II Of/ / / / �«, s - - - - - _ \ I \ I 1 , I / \\� . \ I / ,� \ \ \ \ \ \ 6.0' IIIIIL,�I�a
/ / / 1 / // _ _ - - - _ \\ 5T 0+6INTO I\+75\ ♦ \ \ \ \\ "`\�\�l/ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ �\ FULL SCALE: 1"=
// / / / \ ( / / / 4 � __�� - - - - - - - - - � �\ \ \ \ \ . \ \ \\� � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ I O' 3.75' 30
/ / / I / / ��� -Ef�GEF� N N N \ \ \ ' \ \ � _ \\� \�\ -�� ��� `-� \ \ \ \ `�'O \ — — — _ _ ~_ 0 30 60
/ \ \ \ . �_7B — \ BANKFULL STAGE
I — _ _ SEDIMENT P�'IF� \ \ �\ N '- — w �l A \ \
/ I l'R Sh\FO BE f�EMOV AM \ \ \ \ 2" - FULL SCALE
/ 1 I 1 - - - _ _ _ WETLAND Wh SEE DET C�5 \ A\ \ \ \ \ .\ ••.; _ ```� .w� iL \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -
1 ` _ _�� _ \ \DISPOSED CCF OFF\SIT \ \ \ \:::::. '� - „ ��\� \ \ \ \ \ \ _ , \l` 'I\
/ 1 \ - - _ - _ - - - \ N \ \ \
_ _ \ I N \1\��� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ 1" = HALF SCALE
I I - - _ - - - - - - - - - - \,\ \ \\ N\ \\ \ 0o \\ \\ \\— \ \ \\e\������ \\ \� \ \ \\
I - - _ _ - - - - - - 1 \ \ \ \
Alt \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ di
\ — — _ _ - - N \ \ \ \ \ � � �1 \ m\ \� \ \ \ \
\ \ \ I 1 / ` \
N- - - - - \ \ \
_ _
\\ — _ _ — \ \ \ `�s \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 \ �,.,., j — \\ \\ — — TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
_ _ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I\• —1 —L 1 • \\ \\ — o_ co
— —
.11
- - - - - - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 I I I Il ` . 1 \ \\\ \� - - -
- - _ ,,� �� A \ \ V \ V A \ \ \ 1 \ I II \ I / �.. � � \ v U
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- � \ �o \ \ 1 \ \ \ I \ I I / �\\ � \\ \ N
- - - - _ _ — _ _ \\ \ \\ \ 1 11 \ 1 \ \ \
\ \\ \\ 11 \ l -�\ \' I \\ \ \ / , F-
- - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - -\X \ 1 1 1 I I I \I \ \ \ \ \ NL \ \ \ - cni-
-
v \ \ \ I \ A \ \ \ \�:AO\� 'v .�. v v O
U
fl
0
U-
OH
O
740 740 z
oC }
0 Ct
u_ Q
Z a z_
o U) 2
() W
_IW
W W Q_'
CC CC 0-
735 735
Q
Z
PROPOSED TOP in
EXISTING TOP OF BANK I— O
a, OF BANK (n r
Z Q
S44 545 546 Q =
0 730 --'`\ 730
w 547 Q
548 Z fY
�\ �- ` ` i
E _ -- \ T U
�' I I \ ----- 0 Z Q
% /
W1.11
ch - 1- \
)
fY
c� 725 I
725 Q
0ZU
rLviuijT2
occ EXSTINGGRADEALONG ST =AM \ 2 0 J J
CENTERLINE w Z in Q i-
yi
W 0
a)
PPOPIRSED w Z z
TIE REACH RD4-B CHANNEL BED 0 Q Q
v INTO EXISTING BEDrY 720 OF REACH PD4 ,q 720 0 a
U
4)
° TI REA H RD4 INTO
P OPOSED BED OF PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o REACH RD2
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
a
DESIGNED: SCF
0
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
o°'c SHEET NUMBER:
6E
di 0+00 0+50 I +00 1 +50 2+00 z<
w S8
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
L
J \ I

c / / / / / / / ,
/ / / / 7' /' 7 /l I �`"
,/ // / / / / / // / // // / / /7 V
/ / / / / /
' / / / / / / / // // / / / /
,/ / / / / 7 / 7 / / / / i ti
,/� / / / / ^� // // // 7/ // // i/ // //
/
/ / / / / // // /// �// / �/ // // // /// //// / / // i 3600GIenwoodAve, Suite100
ji
,/� / / / / / / / �� / �� �/ // / / / / �cE
' / / / / / / / / O/ i i i / / / ,SCE / / // Raleigh, NC 27612
.' / / // // Z // // // // 'IZ /�� �� � / �L j/ / // // / / /� Main: 919.829.9909
/ / / / / , / / / / 7
/ �/ / / / // / ��G 7� � �/ 7 // / 7 / / / /� www.res.us
y z z 7 7 fi
/ I I 1 / / / / -- / i // // / / / / �< Engineering Services Provided By:
1 i i i i / / / / / ,
I / / I 1 I 17 � 7 15 7 NO GREDIT� / / / / z r Angler Environmental, LLC
i i / / / / / License: F 1428
I 1 j I I I, � ��� i — = / �j--- 7�a �o I9 / // / / / /� / SEAL
I / / 1 I 1 17 � _ — 7 / / / / / / �F
1 1 I 1 / l 1 o� �/ �/ / // ,/ �/ �7 / rw,.
I 1 / / / // / / / / / / / 7 — 77 ��� �� / // / / i i i
I I I / / / / / / / / / // �6RAD�OU f-FEAD�CUT v �77 77 �O`- // /j//�/ i7� 7 J
' I I I I I I / l / / / 7 / / / l �IVIAT EED,�P,ND1IV€ AK ,7 7 / / / / i — J
I 1 I I / l l l / / l l \ \ \ v / / / /// i /7v °,1 x , — , 7
I I I I 1 I / l l / / ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ( 7 / 1
ED I
I 1 i
i
l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ // / / _'1 ` \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I �=ins frt_ - / �'� v i
l \ \ \
\ \ `GRA E �u�E o�Io1N L \ \ \ 1 - — ���� 11 /
Nim
\ \ \ \ \ \\ l AT ANIQ EDP \ \ \ \ \ I V /— + -4- — �iiip -- J�
\ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ \N N \ \N \ \\\ \N\ \x\\f �N ` \ � �/�-700= I �///
\ N \\ N \ \ \ \N\\\ \�\ \ \� \\ \\N \ \\ \` \ \ _ _ _ �� i j
N N V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N - \ _ _ _ - - _ /
\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\� \ \ \ \� � \ \ - - - / I /i/
V V A A \ \ v v v v \ v vN v vA v \ N v v \ v �
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \\ \ \N\ \ \ NN \ \ \ �/�" \ \\ \ \ � \\ \ �\ \\ � 705— -� / / FULL SCALE. 1 -30
\ \ N \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\� \ � - - - - - _ / / �/ /
\ \ \ \ \ \ N N ) \ \ \ \ Z \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ - - - _ _ /
\ \ \ \ N \ \\ \\ \�\\ \\ N \\\ \� N\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ � -- -- - - � � � / / 0 30 60
\ N \\ N\ N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ N \ \� '7IO / /
\ \ \\ \ \ N\ \\ \\ N N \ \ \\ \ \\ \ N \ _\ -\ � � / I 2 = FULL SCALE
\\ \\ \\\ \\\\ \ N\ N\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\\� �� \ \ \ �� � _ _ \\ / /I I 1" = HALF SCALE
\ N \ N \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \\ \ N \\ N \ \ \\\ \\\ — � \ '�,1 / I I
\\ \V \\\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ NTRA h T,O)�ELVIC'V\ \ \ \\ \��S� - � _� -- , / I I
\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \�ANb. 51-cs D� FF\- II��\\\\�\\\— �� \ , � I \ \
\ \\ \ \\\ N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1-
N N N N \ N N \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \\ Q
\ \\ N N \ N \ \ N N N N N N N \ N 20 \ \\ \ \ . \ o 0
\ \\ \\\\ \ \\\ \N\ \\ \\N \\\\ N\ \\ \\ \\� � �\\\ \ \\ \\ � \ \ N\\ \\ \ 1- Q
\\\ \� N \N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \\ \\ \ \\\\ \ � � \\ \N \ ,� 0 L
N N \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N\ \ N\\� N\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ N
\ 0_ co
� � N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V \ \ 2S \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ � Z
\ \ \ \ \ V \ N V \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \�N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \\\\ \\\\ \ \ O_
\\ N \ ,� \\ \ \\ \\ \ V \V \V \ \ \\ \\ \ \ N \ \ \ \ `�,� \ H
— N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ N \ N\ \ \\ \ U
�\ \V V\ \V N N A AV A N )� VV N \ \\ vv vv v\ N N\ vV VV A� A \V Av fI
— V N \\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \ \\ \\ 0\ \ �\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ N \ \ N \ \ :\ \ I-
N N \
_ \\\\\ \\ \\ \\\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\` \\\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\`�. \\ Z
0
r1
0
U-
1-
0
710 710 Z
oC }
0 il
u_ Q
Z 0 Z_
0 v) 2
() W J
5 _1in
W W 0_'
I
705 705
�C\ PROPOSED Q
\ CHANNEL BED Z
/
'I—^ QN
0)
`\\� .� VJ Ld_
c .\ Z
��,\��.\ \ ��\�\�\ �,\\ EXISTING TOP Q U
\ v \ \ OF BANK —
. I _
0 700 \\ 700
w . Q
`� 4 Q 0
Z
Lii H i
H
_ 0 0
-; W Z Q
W D W
0 695 695 0 fY
0 0
0 Z
6 2
�. W 0 J di
\\\ Q Q H
i — z W 0
Q EX I ST I\I G GRAD; 7/ �✓ 0
ALO N S ST SEA w Li— z
z CENTERLI N: 0 < Q
U
z 690 690 c p
0
N
O
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o) PROJECT MANAGER: MB
o
DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
0)
U)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
di 0+00 0+50 1 +00 1 +50
w S9
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
L
J \ I

/". 1 r \
1 I
1 I
I0 res
I
I I3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
I I
i I Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
I
Engineering Services Provided By:
I Angler Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
I
SEAL
i I
I
I I
I /
I / , ,
I I — /
_ - i
_ � _ ,
— _ il -
— - I
_ _ /
j_____
_ - - - _
—
—
ih i — -L-C
qi
/- i'
-ice �� —1 j/j /��_ / /— — —' 4-,
-D__ _ _ ____ _ ____ ____ --
/ — / / - //
_ � � �—��/ .� _ _ � \ , /— — --- iss , / , \ , , __ __ __ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___.
/ ,-. / ��— FULL SCALE: 1"=30
/ 1
-. — - -//'- \ / / / - - - - - - - Itçl—_
- - �� / �/____ _ ____ ,--7
\ —// \\ \✓ // / / / / /\ 2" = FULL SCALE
l�j- - � / _ — �' i ��� ,\ 1" = HALF SCALE
-- _ — 1 �/ f \ \ - - - / / / /-
---/- /
I � .� — - �-i00 / /� - - -- / �/1 REACH KD6
- _ _ _ _, -� _,� -,; , � NO CREDIT Q o
— _
\ �,� � - - - - - - '- .- - - - �� STA 0+ 22 TO I +79 N
\ _ _ - —
CL co
._ ____ * ____ ____,-- — --- --__ — ---- ____ _-- /-
�7� / � / I
op '9 ,1( � / _ _ _ / 2, -
4 lO / _ 0
_
11
I,_-_n -„ , -----.....„„ ___.--_,_2-___< _____ _oriel ,,,, .....,4_____,---- its I\ ,,, /( V _..
illigt
1 `\\ \ \ �- /�/ c/. ��� �> \6\" fir` +�d//I �\ ' II \Q ' Z
:N N. ----- -- ,,,... -----, (1-7' \\---- --- 4--.] : .---——-'....--'•-•-" ---:: -. `a 0
- — _ _ N ......... /Ni
(/ \ \ \ �'� \ \— — \ ---T ----_3--fir7 H
� _ \\ \ \ \ 69 `N —/ SC- fl>71
,____ _ diiwir.,. _____—:- ---__:-: ____ 2\ 2\ C:\ \\- — — — - `/7
-.,„---- -------1. ----..0— ....zr7-- ....... _____------... ---...-----___-- —__ __ _ _ ___ --- .„-- „ 0
fi -- ;0---- ------- ---
_ w 5\goo - wT�ASh TO BE REMOVED , - - _ _ - -;- / Z LLI —
rI
AND DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE —~ r - - _cos
_ _ - -
— z
x / - _ _ , _ _�_ \ - - W
- - —/ - - -7/0 - -
C01
� — — / _
� _ \\ _
CO
' z U
ro
/ �/ / - - - - -cam _ _
\!
co
o
w — — rvi—
Cfl
co
`� c�
— ' '
~II
O Et
ui l 2 , _
�' 0
0 H
co
I W z
W
co 1 i O
o \ 1�1 / / 0 U
If z i
I �I l l j l / ' Q
1 1 1 \ .Cr Ill di
o
�, I I I I 1 ' I 1 \ ` 2 O J _i
Q I I I I I l \ I- W 0 0
REACH �d 5 I I/ 1 I I� I I I 1 1 ) , w IL Z z
14 I 1 /
I I I 1 I j I 11 1 / 1 / /� ° c
z I cc
1 I I I I 1 / / / / / / ; r \\ o
I I I II I I I I l l / l 1 1 I ��i/'/
Q I I I I 1 1 / / / / lI / I( � Q / / /4
I I L<,
I 1 I I 1 I I ' / I , I I / I/ , pi / / 1 PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
I I I v l 1 1 1 1 I 1 I Ill / I �� Il� � � � I
I 01
/ I I PROJECT MANAGER: MB
Io
I I I 1 1 1 I I I / / / I l l DESIGNED: SCF
1 / / / I I I l l I I I I �q ( ,� ✓ / 111 II III DRAWN: SCF
I 1 I 1 / 1 1 I I I // I nil CHECKED: AFM
:10-
I 1 1 I 1 / ' , I Il / III IIII co I
1I1 I / , / I 1 I I o ` al �. I , / o / 1 l \
I I 1 I I ll ' l I 1 l 1 I o I I \�1 11 , , / i\o / // / I 1 If I \ \ \cc
\ // / SHEET NUMBER:
di
I I \ \ / / / / , , / / / / / 1 I q I 1 1, //) // / / / / \ \ \ \ - - - - - -
z \ I \ \ / / / / ; / / / / , o / / / / 1 , l 'I 1 I �� ,/ ''1 j/ ,/ / ,/ / // ` \ \ \ `\�\ S 1 0
Li I I I in
I / 1 / l l / / ' l ' l l / 1 I V 1/ / / /�/ii/ / // V v/ / — — -x�—
1 1 / l l l I ,� ;LL'" /./ / ,//moo./, / / / /
J ` J

f 1 r \
1 LEGEND Ores
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
\ 1
EASEMENT LCE
1
\
\ \ EXISTING TREELINE 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
\ ' \\ 1 PROPERTY LINE _ Raleigh, NC 27612
\ 1 Main: 919.829.9909
/ INVASIVES TREATMENT \XXX'
www.res.us
\ / (TOTAL AREA: 14.33 AC)
1 Engineering Services Provided By:
\\ -/ \ 1 Angler Environmental, LLC
\ ' \ License: F-1428
1 SEAL
\ 1
'\
\ \ \
\ \
\ \ 1
1
I \ 1
1
\ i \
\ \
/
- \ �/ / / \
REMOVE CONCRETE AND
/ \ � 4
• ��� DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE 4t4k
ss I ��
4)&- VirVAk / �� ,� FULL SCALE: 1"=100
/r/
4 / . 4r‘. ...,4,A ,
hettii \ 0 100 200
���eleVite4010 , �/ \
\ �i 2" = FULL SCALE
✓/ - • ., �� �� � � � -
/ v _ �' RE1 JOVE PIPE AND ,', ���'4i'� r11r�1�� 1 - HALF scALE
\ 1 / /��`. =�.?. � Z► A� << r� .,' '���►4 �� 1 ��" REMOVE BEAMS AND
1 .- , �� ! �� �� DISPOSE O F OFF-SITE / ( 1' �r i` ry ` 1 �1' �� �� ����
, , . ,,,I.,�� /- - -- - _ �� !�� Nosy� ��1,
I vv II ���' �� �� `�li►' i. DISPOSE OF OFF-SITEREMOVE FENCE IN v I A' ,*;, / • -o *� ► ��ft �'4�v i i i 'vvvvwv NAI� �!'' �� ��v Q
EASE/ ENT AND � ,�,.v - -•- _; '� ��� �� v - - v I \s �,v v vvvv\vvvvv1N:, Ilt � � ��11�
DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE \��k ,4 f �? v, - , --' — 4vv��� ''`'� � vv _ _ _ _ _ — �`` vvvvv vv\.0 „., � v. � � 4�41..,k VIVILO
o_0 0 Q
co
le
4 --- Z
� � �� - ` v '' , -*/4 <h r/0 - _ _ � _— _ ��� ,1�� ��� �lp --� ___ v _ v v/- 1 �h I \ � 11 1 I ,I� � � "41*p'#4x'
+ a
It alb® �° �, �\ E ` — ���r��/....��w�av� v v — _ I I v
fI
Ot ' '�* 1 \\ _-`� `,e'Y :p -iii4 _ -i� •\ J- _ \ _ - \ T` \. ' 4j1 �, w� afiri; � �1 �'��, I I I y'' '1�1� 4 ;���� �1 V I A \ ? ice, 2 -\ - \l/ ��G..�litp�►► \ ! _ - �il�.tr. l l I 11 ` D
/k �0� ik ��1 \ \L)
\ �` \ — — _ — \ \ \ \� _ - ��ji ' y I I j 1�1 1111AA\\ • /� `11� � ` I)
c~n
� �s#4414444 I / / ,,N.�✓ 4_ -- - - 4-\ �.` ''`\��/ +' - ^ - - - - _ - - - - - - - _ _� _�;__�/�/ � 111 \ I \r\ SAA#444 o
letteee to / _ __—_—_ _ �A-�� a� , _ �� - - - - _- __ _ _ / y / I \ r\ Essiv44/
At*
tfr i.)// ,-' ,..1------- ----,-17.--- - 4--Z----- N — ------ .Z., .--:-. ' -.4* „ V''' -----v ,',020#.30‘39---- /4 ------- ---------- ---- --- grn,_ — — — — — — —
At 7
0 ...\, it,
//
10\ I
� _ii,,,, ,,,,, ,,;,-„ ,---,-,_ -____ ,_-___,_-__-„,- .
_ �'_��
``t / / �� ` \\ \ \� \ 9 -/ I` �_ \ \ - / / ',„ , r , '� •,\\�I�I4,II
/ Z0
4$*
1 wow ��/ / � Avfrilio�'• � �� �'Z„�: - -\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\� ��\\ \ .� �- \_ �_� � � � �` �- �.�- \ \ � , / .� i LL
DRAIN EXISTING << ._ o z
;�� ! —•C� � '�44 _ 41:/---.4-00°S �� �r��� � A �� �,,, �_e� sir \ ' \;ra t .+sE_Z — ...� .3 — /� , Z wFAI��/ POND / O 4,0�►� in
��y-4 A ��S � ��� #01.".4". ..---#.,--:,,..-
� `r-'•r- -�, ems` ° �_2( - ‘F.4 *N‘1/4 VW - - '...440 -*A►Iiv 0 V� �,04 � 441 I.,.. # VAIS
\ si‘V•# i- w
„--_____-7/
-/1,4,101,. *0-Aef/ -
t ... _ Ilt.„ A tsio k 440,1 0 0,s4.1 e
44;k6Abar4 ASIV A, frilillke 440. -
=1447vN11;47031411#S444401‘.41^4410b CC 0-
V ----,- - ----- 4„, ,,i,,,./40 14*opipecefeiTA,
i W CC W rI
> #' ik,\ 4ki 44. #414,144/
4*,40,
AO
4%,#4140‘&41‘#S4V4S#47i#4W4%Iti gt-V• 474644
\ / //hjiVp*/ . \.1..--- --\ ' //
/ i *4 Ay flM# \
thje** `-\-= / z<
"IV
i / � '� � � � REMOVE PIP � vitkAN , '1404s,.84,4 ��, `� I P �� ��� � '� r in
� � ♦ 1*w
� � ��►� #4494
' • �àAâI' =� 14`40"
IV� . - ,'k k k /
/ / Ikiw �� DISPOSE OF Off-I -SITE - �' 4 '� �• , = � r "�• .; k I. ,/ O
itS
.61.,.#,
Cr) r2
'� • �'// OL#7 1 /I 11 �. / /i//� ' \ N:7\ ----7
. 404. -------— — ---- ----. -> \\\\ N ---.. —
�\� \\ \\ \ '/ / I— 2 Q
w ® �� �* � � 1-7 I 1 I vv// / ///// — vv v� \\� v� / 01_Q
i, - I' 1111i I ✓// /// rThri-
� I�E�/ OVE TI�ASh AN A \\ \1\�
��y__ _ // / \ / _ Z 0
w Si_ dh,►_ - 9- ;� - /// DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE'H X�x __ h h ___al -- ////.- , Z
Z
in in/zzyz
/ inD F-
6 o O z
/ -
Z =
ci
/ Q0_
u; 0 J w
4) O J
~
a LJJ 0 0
o L- Z Z
�, w
U Q
Zcc Y cc
0 a
N
O
a / PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
a
-
DESIGNED: SCF
o .
ox
DRAWN: SCF
- CHECKED: AFM
ill
/- / SHEET NUMBER:
-w lvii
J ` J

f 1 r \
I LEGEND Ores
/ 0 LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
i EASEMENT LCE
i
/ EXISTING TREELINE 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
PROPERTY LINE - Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
/ INVASIVES TREATMENT www.res.us
(TOTAL AREA: I .99 AC) \XXX'
Engineering Services Provided By:
/ Angler Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
i
SEAL
/
/
- --7
i
' /
I i
i
' /i
41It----= •Xte 'Y' V)P14a#,Q— — 4- N
, --_____,--
:::/._------.-----.--_, ... _---=,,:f
. � * 111
_7-__:'""'—'411414:. �� FULL SCALE: 1"=100
,------ ......_ ItAir 84tir— ---, ,
'- = 2" = FULL SCALE
_ v._
Z �11� p .�i ` 1" HALF SCALE
..)-)j)
leC
— .fi t\\ \ .\ ���� ��-, di
H
REMOVE TRASH AND _ �464 � o N
DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE _ 'ff[� '' °
O
-4 11
)//4 fI
1-1/ /C11
1) I/
1 � cn
z
44;', )
l / 1 � 1I � ,�14llq % U
- ----- _ _rThjj.)--)1 I i I `-c-N) ( i I/4/iiiA4peA ihk, ra, 10/\ \ 1-
3 \ \ \ 1- I/ 1\f/gfcrk‘V40-4 "304. \ \-- -, - - 0
/, I, ', \ \, )/1/2021/1)////,/,4".vic,40,44%4tAlp4 .! .sar.yip#44,4,11,4,,,,,....„), \,..._\ z
/ I \<)\\)<\(,\\\\\\\\*.-.%_,4 - 4-r.. ......-.„?._ 11/-rN - eii LL <
/ i \ \ \, \ AEr % 41b+AN4 +I --... '‘.
\ \V\\ kfl--‘11- • A p-40, Is*V. ,
// 1ji) \\ \\\'-Ibk, --. --- 41-1V-4,;.:--AV.., -•• AV.. (7) <
LLJ
__#....me.___Allt-\ -&.4...j _i/ Aii 4,1 ktito,,,//h, U_
CC 0-
-
/ iii \\�=_ _9� iir 4 e— — ' , REMOVE TRASH AND
/
, _ ___- - _ .'.►\\ DISPOSE OF OFF SITE
' Q
a, —74 \\ I
Z II -o ~aI -H U
w 2 > Z
Q
�1 I Z
F i W D W
0 Z
0 U Q
s Q I
U
W Q J W
N J
W O ~
Q 0 1- W 0 (�
U II- Z Z
�, W
U Q
0 o
Z
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o) PROJECT MANAGER: MB
ox
DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
I
SHEET NUMBER:
di
M2
z
Liu
L_
J ` J

f 1 r
\•
0
PLANTING LEGEND res
\ ,.... ,
\ \ LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
\ /" ' \\ \
EASEMENT LCE
, \ \ EXISTING TREELINE 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
\ -
\/ \ \
PROPERTY LINE - Raleigh, NC 27612
\ Main: 919.829.9909
\ \
\ RIPARIAN PLANTING >0 www.res.us
1 (TOTAL AREA: 18.55 AC)
\ Engineering Services Provided By:
/ \ Angler Environmental, LLC
1
License: F-1428
,
\ i \
\ \
SEAL
\ 1
\
0 ) ,.5-,5- / \
\ I���/ i �1
\ 0# #111P' "qr
/ \
*N 4.111" 411" 4 # Art
\ 7 4'4 4".114
/ \
, s" . .4„ , \ 14'
k. 'CO '.4.414..r 004/illieb. 4.4
8 .c14►�. �� y v O 8�'� ����:1®��� �����. �k� ,� ��NA ��'' \ eaL,...
��� 0��A FULL SCALE: 1"-100
f' w�A�� � °4.410" �: ��-�. ..0 taw 0* .. ••:►�®-i-�.��� -_ �. v��+,h5r ik*
0 N► � • At - 100 200
r. T co
;�♦♦♦♦♦'�♦♦♦♦♦���.� `���♦��� ,�� �� I � �ofr1/� a 7404'40. ♦�♦Atillrlr _ _♦°° d- c �►� �,♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� 2" = FULL SCALE
�,�0� i ��� �y., ii.� , ���i 41 '��� 1" = HALF SCALE
P ro 1
*AN it A
-740 0 * iii
ilk t.&,' , '*Alit wo'1% '-4 4fr itItaxig a 1 tt-\ ' . \ * *
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ` 400
� � 'sF • 0 , 414. A\ , c,.1
•�'•� I,`� ` 0w \ ° _, ...0�� �� ` Are
0_ co
- -IP 404t -ii* - -7.-- .---4:- v ...A.,.0.. ,,bok,, /
k k °Pr k 0 \ ##41,# Z
A I ill°Ilkilt•t4":414,47+41‘Nre401 pri 1 i pciii or 0 7 2 5 s;fX 14.,4444, 4..., ,/ 0
itio 1 .4* * *•*•
.g•ilpr.4.". Nr VP'44111"Se4-..-vp _ 0 4tal I IVII.A vO°4A‘- '‘ '‘'.;.'4W7+.4,4$74Ntio.V411f* * # .444* 4*, f.&,
411*
44.101A\ 4044, . 4hk.„
NI:#;"--- •vi74.-:&-4„0, 44.4, 4 Wiltr4W , •4‘1:.. • 8,$, -. .+4 kA.,.4‘4444,
i � •s� A 4"ek 1. ‘,,, ,
// // Z� ���
I Or //
41.
46.4 . **94441%;.44( '/ ,
1 . . i ... .
. . 9 s\+.` // ,
1 \ „, i
i 4 Iti 9 AIN-Aik A \ k k
< 1
40$*4 0.4. i
\ \ 44#4. '• AI& A*
At,. Alb. -4- • **k.41111:2'#'* : kk k /
I 40 A., Ai, 46.___________ Akie,„,116. t-------------41-
//
, ...40440.44...
4,4,AP .4. ,
(n w J
•
• .....4
cC
�i �i���e��.► ��,/// ,_______________ _______________\____________-x-----' --------------x
2_____ _ ----------
x----------
X----------
X----------
z
�
U) f
z Q
CO PLANTING TABLE PLANTING NOTES 0 °
co — _
0 Permanent Riparian Seed Mix ~ z
ALL PLANTING AREAS Q
Common Name Scientific Name Percent I I. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION C� O J
Composition IS ESTABLISHED AND FINAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT w
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO ENSURE MEASURES ARE Virginia Wildrye Elymus virginicus 25% Z
LLi / FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. C0
H - Indian Grass Sorghastrum nutans 25% C ` 7
r L
Hi / Little Blue Stem Schizachyrium scoparium 10To 2. DISTURBED AREAS NOT AT FINAL GRADE SHALL BE TEMPORARILY VEGETATED WITHIN I 0 0 H
I -' Soft Rush Juncus effusus I OTo WORKING DAYS. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL BE in z H
Blackeyed susan Rudbeckia hirta 10To ESTABLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN I O WORKING DAYS. SEEDING SHALL BE IN z
ACCORDANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL PLAN. W
Deertongue Dichanthelium clandestinum I OTo O J
Common Milkweed Asclepias syriaca 5% 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED PRIOR TO PLANTING BY DISC OK SPRING TOOTH 00 w
CHISEL PLOW TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. MULTIPLE PASSES SHALL BE MADE ACROSS
0 .-- Showy Goldenrod Solidago erecta 5% PLANTING AREAS WITH THE IMPLEMENT AND THE FINAL PASS SHALL FOLLOW TOPOGRAPHIC Z =
U - CONTOURS. Q w
�' Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species W J W
a� - / 4. BARE ROOT AND LIVE STAKE TREE SPECIES SHALL FOLLOW THE COMPOSITION SHOWN IN THE 2 0 0 _1
co - - Percent TABLE TO THE LEFT. SPECIES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED BASED ON AVAILABILITY. < w
7:5 - Common Name Scientific Namew 0
-- Composition Z
- Black Willow Salix nigra 40% 5. BARE ROOT AND LIVE STAKE TREE SPECIES SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO THEIR RESPECTIVE U z Z
a� -
DETAILS. BANKS PROPOSED FOR LIVE STAKING ARE SHOWN ON THE LIVE STAKING PLAN Pi
LL
- / Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 30% SHEET(S).
a 4....
Z - - /-- Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 30To CC f2 CC
6. BARE ROOT PLANTING DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 800 STEMS PER ACRE. SPECIES SHALL BE 0_ a
o " - DISTRIBUTED SUCH THAT 3 TO 6 PLANTS OF THE SAME SPECIES ARE GROUPED TOGETHER.
.o /-- -- Bare Root Planting Tree Species
a - / Percent 7. TREATMENT/REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, PINES AND SWEET GUMS LESS THAN 6" DBH SHALL PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
TiiiCommon Name Scientific Name BE PERFORMED THROUGHOUT Ti PLANTED AREA.
" - Composition PROJECT MANAGER: MB
x
0 /- American Sycamore Platanus occidental's 20% DESIGNED: SCF
a
8. TEMPORARY SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS
- - River Birch Betula nigra I 5% WITH SLOPES EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3:I I . DRAWN: SCF
n -
- -7:5 / Willow Oak Quercus phellos I 5% CHECKED: AFM
9. PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
co
ac
-- - White Oak Quercus alba I OTo CONSERVATION EASEMENT AT A RATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
Northern Red Oak Quercus rubs I OTo SHEET NUMBER:
Ed - Shumard Oak Quercus shumardii 10To
F1
-
Q � � Eastern Red Bud Cercis canadensis I OTo
-
in / - Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida I0To
J /
J ` J

f 1 r \
I PLANTING LEGEN D
I
res
I
I LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT LCE
EXISTING TREELINE 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
IPROPERTY LINE - - _ _ Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
0 RIPARIAN PLANTING www.res.us
(TOTAL AREA: 2.03 AC)
Engineering Services Provided By:
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING Angler Environmental, LLC
(TOTAL AREA: 0.3 I AC) / j / License: F-1428
SEAL
\ _
_cI_ _ I ://///1-/)/-////////---//////-////-//
FULL SCALE: 1"=100
I_ _ I p 100 200
\III�, _ _ _11
_. . _ 2" = FULL SCALE
.... .....
— ►� ,�,; v�������� _ 1" = HALF SCALE
� a .
c.,
; ��� 47
-----0 , -, ,.._ _
c..„
_ ____ ... ,_ _ Q
�,�' I— o
� �
�i� I�
ow
I \ )
\J " Z
4r � �'
: ='fit- . 4, \ -,_-
ON ' I-
z
. \
1
I ct
itI
0
LL
, �,;4� grA z o uw_ _ _ � n '
' \ \ \ 1- //1//f),Fr ,' ‘T/41' .41"'' ' ‘;‘,\ \- —
......‘ ____ --- ___ ____
5
< .
fI/))/// 44.4fr 4_ -4, 4,-
4...-.._4. \ w(T)
, 1 1 )// ////////iir+v- -- -4,-.9-- --",,,,
, . 44, _.+4,,,, . ltreir-41.0 ,„,,,,,v,
NylivoN. _ ,0-- A.,,,141„.„*„. ___,_L _.,
/ I ''' ''\\V 00`. 4,- vi-e- '6
z
/ I \ \ ,\\_. ...iwaitrAtir,,,AtAi.,e4t,...4,14.A, 69- ---: '
/ \\\\,._-_-___.--- __-_-_- 1:7- -.i,...4,.....4010:**W -------- (1) r2
u) / ..'..‘\....:.-1----2---------------------------7------------------75------.41 I I 6''' -'lleALer., 4 I L' ----''•---- -----:---------- Z r.<
0eC�\\�, PLANTING TABLE PLANTING NOTES _
0 -- — �\�� Permanent Riparian Seed Mix ~ i z
LiJ — — / _ \\ \N p ALL PLANTING AREAS Q
> (Q i / — _, \\ \ Percent I I. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION 0 O J
(/) / \ Common Name Scientific Name _ ^
�q�\ \ \ Composition IS ESTABLISHED AND FINAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT 0_
I \ x Virginia Wildrye Elymus virginicus 25% EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO ENSURE MEASURES ARE I— Z
uJ I FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. C
H Indian Grass Sorghastrum nutans 25% C ` " z
�i I Little Blue Stem Schizachyrium scoparium I 0% 2. DISTURBED AREAS NOT AT FINAL GRADE SHALL BE TEMPORARILY VEGETATED WITHIN I 0 r L
Soft Rush Juncus effusus 10% WORKING DAYS. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL BE Z I-
1 I Blackeyed susan Rudbeckia hirta I 0% ESTABLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN I O WORKING DAYS. SEEDING SHALL BE IN z
co I ACCORDANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL PLAN. w D
co Deertongue Dichanthelium clandestinum 10% O J
O Common Milkweed Asclepias syriaca 5% 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED PRIOR TO PLANTING BY DISC OK SPRING TOOTH 0
CHISEL PLOW TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. MULTIPLE PASSES SHALL BE MADE ACROSS 0 0-
0 I Showy Goldenrod Solidago erecta 5% PLANTING AREAS WITH THE IMPLEMENT AND THE FINAL PASS SHALL FOLLOW TOPOGRAPHIC Z
U I CONTOURS. Q 0_
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species w J L.LI
a) I I 4. BARE ROOT AND LIVE STAKE TREE SPECIES SHALL FOLLOW THE COMPOSITION SHOWN IN THE 2 0 O J
(I) Percent TABLE TO THE LEFT. SPECIES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED BASED ON AVAILABILITY. < W ~
P Common Name Scientific Name Composition z W 0 ~
I Black Willow Salix nigra 40% 5. BARE ROOT AND LIVE STAKE TREE SPECIES SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO THEIR RESPECTIVE U Li— z
DETAILS. BANKS PROPOSED FOR LIVE STAKING ARE SHOWN ON THE LIVE STAKING PLAN w
1 0
a�
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 30%
wood 0 �/ Q
z0 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 30% fY Ld_ fY
G. BARE ROOT PLANTING DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 800 STEMS PER ACRE. SPECIES SHALL BE 0_ 0
o DISTRIBUTED SUCH THAT 3 TOG PLANTS OF THE SAME SPECIES ARE GROUPED TOGETHER.
.o Bare Root Planting Tree Species
a Percent 7. TREATMENT/REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, PINES AND SWEET GUMS LESS THAN G" DBH SHALL PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
Tlii Common Name Scientific Name BE PERFORMED THROUGHOUT Ti PLANTED AREA.
Composition PROJECT MANAGER: MB
0
American Sycamore Platanus occidental's 20% 8. TEMPORARY SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS DESIGNED: SCF
a
o River Birch Betula nigra I 5% WITH SLOPES EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3:I . DRAWN: SCF
n Willow Oak Quercus phellos I 5% CHECKED: AFM
cy)0) 9. PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
White Oak Quercus alba I 0% CONSERVATION EASEMENT AT A RATE OF I5 LBS/ACRE.
CCSHEET NUMBER:
Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra I 0%
di Shumard Oak Quercus shumardii I0%
zP2
Q Eastern Red Bud Cercis canadensis I 0%
w Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida I 0%
J
LT_
J ` J

f 1 r \
FENCING NOTES:
Ores
I . CONTRACTOR TO TIE PROPOSED FENCE \ FENCING LEGEND
INTO EXISTING FENCE WHERE APPLICABLE
TO MAINTAIN CATTLE EXCLUSION. LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT LCE
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL FENCING \
LOCATED WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT. EXISTING FENCELINE - 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
,
\\ \ Raleigh, NC Su
PROPOSED FENCELINE Main: 919.829.9909
\\ www.res.us
\ , PROPOSED GATE -0 ict
-
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental, LLC
-
\ , License: F-1428
-
, \ SEAL
\ \
\ \
\ \ \
\/ \ \
INSTALL 4 ,750 LF OF \
WOVEN WIDE FENCE \
SEE DETAIL 51-1T D2 / \
\ i ,
rf‘*‘
0 ) \— , \ /ll
'� ''�5 / / ./ ../.. — / \
FULL SCALE: 1"=100
I 0 100 200
\ --:/ - --- ,-411 r- / 1
2" = FULL SCALE
/ �/ / \ / \
\\\ \\ \\ 1111 \ 1
1" = HALF SCALE
Ill l I ( - `\ - _ / / /. � -.�X ---- \ • �r���� �i �r'� \ \\ \ \ 1 \1 \ I I (►
I \ --- .e \ \\\\ - _ .=i 1141 I rl( "' r \ \ \\\ \ \\\�\\ \\I \1 I I 1 I I I w
IN
1 .iII I /- - � _ _ -, / / � -�- • 1 ` \ \\ \��\ � , III (11 � 1L� \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\\\` \ \ Q
i 1 I I / /i -�-; 1 i
\ \1I op,..� �\ I r \\ \\ \\\� \
\\1I111 \ 1 1\1 \ \ - �; � \ _ _ =_ � �� \/////- ..... 1 I LEI „_;�'', -'\��. NNX �\\ \\\ r '' �\\ \\ \ \ \\\ \\\ 1 11\\�\\\'- o\ \\
CL co
\ \ 0 '`.---,---\\. , • 1 ' --' /- b >,, -- _ -- - --- ,----- --- _ - -- 4\4- , ------ .. ,....;_.,,__c_ •N \ N . \\\\ \\\\\\', \ . k ,, ) \ \ \ \ 1 0 \0‘ k\s‘,\ \> \\\
\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ * "‘''Z.* k).‘ '. -•-• is, --- --41*V-G=2---- --- Ailw
\ 11 \ \ \ fib � � \ �- —€ _ �4 . ,� �� \ �� �. -\ . \ _
\ \ \ ,(e -� - e� _ — \ \ .\\\ \ \\\\\ II .l \ \ \ \ \ I\m \\\ \\ \\ 4 O
\ \ \ \\ tie _/ * , • - �x-- _ - - - - - - - ml I 1 \ \\
1 1 \ \� v\ \ V \ ; 6 ,4:4 . r/ _ "; - _ � _ _ _ _ma x - 1 V Al \ )1))1.)l I I II 1') \\�\A\Ill�l�A\\\vvv 0
1I �II I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \`, X �s" '' •
�r ,� _- \ _ � �4e,` - \ � _ ' - - ` � ����•� - J/. ) f/�jII Li 1 IImIII I1 \ \\ \\ \\\\ \ \\\ \\\�\ ram rY
cp J / I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ 1 \1\ s,,. o fir-_- 4 -\_ - _\` - - \//,- — �_-_` J ., // I 1 I`�I J t;t.,
I II \ \\ \\ \\ \ \����\ ���,
�/ / 1 \ \ \ 1 I \ ``�- t•+�, -r #k;' ��4 ti '"f � - - - - - - ` ----1-::::---- =� � _ �_ __ -���" / / 1I I 111 \\ \\\N \ \\ ' z
/ / I I I I 117 \, \\J�j( � . \ �€ - .. - _ _ - _ _ \ _ ____-/ / I y I I IIII III1 \ \\\\\\\`\� \\` I Z
/ / / �/ /) / /� 1 1 , , , I I � M0 4� - �� _ \/ - — 3— - ���\ ____ 4_� /// � I" \\\\\ r 1 \\ \\ \ I ( /�/ ' 11`\/ U
/ / / / / /� l I / / 4- * _--1-----7!:__',4- .*
� � = -'/ - - - - - - - - -_ _ _:-lo±:::::ll-=:lr-----fL=-_-::;77-=i_T=11__:T::\z/7,/I!")/jli)
_� _ - - � -_ zz / / 1 \ 1 \ \r\ \ I J ) 1 ) / /i // / l/ I / oIIIII / / / / // /' ej /l 1J' �� - �- - ~ ��1c - � _ - . — f �; �\\\\ \\ ( / ( /I /�II / / ( / // OI I ( / / �/ / -� - 0 - IN:
/ \ I I II Z
I ���, \ l I I I / / / / I / • , /��' � \�� � � ` - - — i \ I I� I I I I I I I I 1 I , 1 '► IV AI I I / / n� —� % v�vv�� ��`�vv� � - - -�— � / � �/ , '%�r� k� \ 11 I I I 1 III 1 °�� /� '
1 I _ _
le i III 1 I / ♦ ./j ��:� � ' ^�- _ �\ ��\\��\ _=�\��\\\�\ �� k k �)i\ r#i _� 29- k r r� k \ \\ \\ \ \ A\\\\� \\ \ ��72 A 4 ik k k ', k \‘ \\\\_\.\\‘ \\CC)\\\\ \ \\ \..,"--- -\ v5 o LL z
° 1 I I r/may \\� '� << ' i / > \ J ( \ _ _ `�\-\ ����Ar� _ \ " . ` ,ki.).....7
_ '' -„,
ek kk r k 13,\ J\\\\\
\\`�\\\ \ \\ \' \\\\\ \. �� °° Q
1 j/fir/ �\ N\\ N , / I \ \ \\��?\\ \ \\\\ \ _ \\ \ \ • \ , war— \ z ��\ \ \� \\\\ \\ \\\�� — ' w w
/ l • /"/ ' /\�r • f N �,p��/ /// -�_ J,- ( �`'� \ \ X N�\�\\ \\\\ \\\\ \ \\\ \\ \`� `' �! .r ,� �' � �i - `f rk r e e � \\ \ \\ \\ �� .,=—�/ CC CC Q_
"\k.A.74.44.0 ,s1k..&",..',(44A,,,„411, ;,, .__/\k iikk : k\ \\
Ns
\\\\\,,N„,,X.,/,/,::_,„,....c.7._::-- ----____,///
\ 1//(< 1 I lie / / / \ , \ ) ........ / z z,7,..- ........
/ 1 I l�>I�i , 11 / 1 /i.
�_ v vv v v v� \v�' �\ I \ �(�i 3� � � vv �v �;�- NI'� �\ 'v� �� Q
�`� / I I / r ; r ( ` � y� i N,\ \ \ \ \\ \` \ \ \ \ 1 1 I 1 1/ / � - ` \NNN� \� \� \\\ \ k jk ~\rk rk � ./A \-. Z_
` , I I I r / \ \ \ \ \ ) I I 1 1 \ 1 ./// // 3S \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ ��� l_v ,� w J
r �. / \ \ � 11 \ II III / I )/// /�/� , \ \\ \ \ % O
/ / ��; I 1 11 ) I I III ��.(// / - - \ \ \ \ \ \_ - , N \ \ \r r /
Cr) r2
0) <
/ 1, / I l' \ /jam — � \ I i 1' 1 / l Il / ���' ^ ` \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\—_ \\\\2 —`� Irlr ,
' / I % �I ///, rlr� � v 1 , / . 1/J 11 � �/� i// _
/ J / / iiI r / ' � \ / r / �\ ✓ / Z. i I // / • // I/ / I /// /// � — \ 3 \ _�
o / / / /�i//'�/rk •// /� / / // \ 1 rll1/ �4� 11 / / / / �i i7// / j— \\ \\��� ���N�\\ \\ \\\�'- '� z I` / Q
/ / / ) 1' r //// / I`r I I i/ / \ 3 \ \ X \\\\
O
k� I I I \\ / //// / - � �� \\ \\ / —-E) ) I " , '
I \ i/ /V/j/ /�/� \\ \ \
H \ \ \ %A \ k . / x — x--x /V�/ ///�� ��\VA � / 2 V
V/i ,/ / W Z
0
0 U
/ /, Z =
U Zr , Q w
EU Ed
/ 2 0 J _1_1
z w O
Zr' H
3
/ wo
w0 Z z
U
N
Q
PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
/ PROJECT MANAGER: MB
o / / DESIGNED: SCF
DRAWN: SCF
u
CHECKED: AFM
o°'c _-/ / SHEET NUMBER:
oC / /
-
w Fl
Li „..---- „..----
..
J ` J

f 1 r \
FENCING NOTES: I res
I . CONTRACTOR TO TIE PROPOSED FENCE FENCING LEGEND
INTO EXISTING FENCE WHERE APPLICABLE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
TO MAINTAIN CATTLE EXCLUSION. LCE
I
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL FENCING EASEMENT
LOCATED WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT. EXISTING FENCELINE — 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
PROPOSED FENCELINE Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
PROPOSED GATE —0 ioD
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
I
I
I 0
I INSTALL 660 LF OF
WOVEN WIDE FENCE _ _
� , , SEE DETAIL ShT D2
_ _ FULL SCALE: 1"=100
/
' - y In __� 0 100 200
— _ �
r
d /
/
v \ \, / 44YY . • 2" = FULL SCALE
. F �//-_ �� 1" = HALF SCALE
�� I• I-
_ 1�N - W
-.'s� �. ' fi
~ N
i� � �� � .�'1‘�� AEI, --)jj) O c,
n
— i _ O
�� ~
\ NI,.
fl
Z
/ i I
� I II�I III II �, o
1 / / / , I / ll,, ll/ ,. ,
/ IIIII//// / ll0 /i/ �; �,�
- � - :;1 / I ( l �/ �/ 1/l /j11 111 l/� = ,�
/ / / // /� l/ Illy Hr//� �'� Dili/ O
1 1 171,//11////71/1///t/1/4:7..41,// �� // // l/_it, � / !may,\�111 /����1//�� � /�� .�; :,_ , _ :V �________) ,
zo z
/1 ii \
I — � + W
\ \\ \\\\ g,\��___I- ' _ �_�_ / � ���� _ CC CC a
I �\�\ _ _ - - -
i I \\ _ _- _- _ 30 — \ — z
/ __—11
_—\ �z3 �f�
_ — W
// 0 - - -_ - - --_ /� . _ fY
— \` N N�
u) INSTALL 8 I 0 LF OF 0 =
co ( ,-- -�4 \ \\
WOVEN WIRE FENCE Q I- Z
I SEE DETAIL ShT D2 I
I
0_Liiz 0 zco o W w
N J i-
0
0 Li— Z z
w w
U Q
cc
u_
0 0 o
.
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o) PROJECT MANAGER: MB
o
DESIGNED: SCF
a
0
DRAWN: SCF
CHECKED: AFM
0)
w
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E
di
z F2
J ` J

C 1 r
WHEN AND WHERE TO USE IT
SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE IN AREAS: FLOW
I .25 LB./LINEAR FT. STEEL POSTS
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SHEET OK OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO THE FENCE IS I 00 FEET. B MIDDLE LAYER TOP LAYER
WHERE TI1E MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS (NORMAL[PERPENDICULAR] TO FENCE LINE) IS 211: I V. t -.41 EXTRA STRENGTH BOTTOM LAYER
THAT DO NOT RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOWS GREATER THAN 0.5 CFS. FILTER FABRIC 6' l
-N
\ �� T ��*************************************�**********�1 1 l EARTH SURFACE
Pres
DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE ACROSS CHANNELS OR USE IT AS A VELOCITY CONTROL BMP. i
LIII!lIII!I!IIIII!lI!I!ri!I!!d
,,,,,,,�N A ���al���� A \,, ,CONSTRUCTION SPCIFICATIONS: � Oq �������a, \/;/\i\\\, I /��i\\��\\%�i\j� 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
I . USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS OK POLYESTER, WHICH IS \ rev I Raleigh, NC 27612
CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 646 I I .
c 4 B TRENCH 0.25' DEEP
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A \\\\\ :\ \ HEAVY DUTY PLASTIC TIE ONLY WHEN PLACED ON Main: 919.829.9909
MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS OF EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF 0°TO I 20° / FOR STEEL POSTS PLAN VIEW ENDS OF BAGS IN
` EARTH SURFACE www.res.us
BACKFILL TRENCH WITH \ \ ADJACENT ROWS BUTTED
F. COMPACTED EARTH \_ . \2. ENSURE THAT POSTS FOR SEDIMENT FENCES ARE I .33 LB/LINEAR FT STEEL WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH SLIGHTLY TOGETHER OF 5 FEET. SEE NOTE LOWEST POINT Engineering Services Provided By:
MAKE SURE THAT STEEL POSTS HAVE PROJECTIONS TO FACILITATE FASTENING THE FABRIC. `)'CFF \\/
GROUND LEVEL g SECTION B B An ler Environmental, LLC
CONSTRUCTION: `
License: F-1428
I I . CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF EXTRA STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS. \ \ SEAL
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND / BURY FABRIC \ \
SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE -\ , SANDBAG BARRIERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF THREE LAYERS OF SANDBAGS.
STRUCTURE.) USE EITHER FLAT-BOTTOM / THE BOTTOM LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF 3 ROWS OF BAGS, THE MIDDLE LAYER
OR V-BOTTOM TRENCH +� �\ \ !/-% - EARTH SURFACE SHALL CONSIST OF 2 ROWS OF BAGS AND THE TOP LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF I
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID SHOWN BELOW SECTION A-A ROW OF BAGS. THE RECOMMENDED DIMENSION OF A FILLED SANDBAG SHALL BE
JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT X 0.5 FT X I.5 FT.
FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST. SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
4. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE.
SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO POSTS. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM
50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH. NOTE: END OF DIKE AT GROUND LEVEL TO BE
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF HIGHER THAN THE LOWEST POINT OF FLOW CHECK.
POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC SUFFICIENT SANDBAGS ARE TO BE PLACED TO
6. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH. PREVENT SCOURING.
7. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION COMPACTED ;I- COMPACTED SANDBAG I M PEVI OUS DIKE
OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE. EARTH N EARTH N
8. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES. 0 NTS
RUNOFF c0 RUNOFF c0
MAINTENANCE: �_ _
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS WA z
IMMEDIATELY. N N
SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT IT11 " NOTES:
PROMPTLY. IIIIIII
FILTERREMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO FABRIC 4 FILTER FABRIC IIIIIIIIIII I I. EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY IN DRY AND/OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
��14011111111111111
DI 2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES SHOULD BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK AREAS FROM STREAM FLOW.
REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. �-,, 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE STABILIZED IN ONE
V SHAPED TRENCH DETAIL PO �/' WORKING DAY. A MAXIMUM OF 200 FEET MAY BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME.
REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE FLAT-BOTTOM TRENCH DETAIL �C o�% COARSE AGGREGATE - 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PUMP SIZE SUFFICIENT TO
IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED. \' G -Wel 0 STONE SIZE = 2"-3" PUMP BASE FLOW.
t � Q.��4•-' 5. DIKE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OF NON-ERODIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS SANDBAGS.
',- si ` SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
.401000lli O O O I I. INSTALL STILLING BASIN AND STABILIZED OUTFALL USING CLASS A RIP RAP AT THE
TEMPO RACY SILT FENCE �-" � � 1`41.E DOWNSTREAM END OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT WORKING AREA.
O 44P -� 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE PUMP AROUND PUMP AND THE TEMPORARY PIPING
NTS i�IIeI�I 'I -tweak
: O O�O�• , THAT WILL CONVEY THE BASE FLOW FROM UPSTREAM OF THE WORK AREA TO THE di
, 11I1411111�� , `••� •- •�^ LIZED OUTFALL.
3. NSSTTAILL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM I o
�4Pj�O O OO.�) DIVERSION. p
S 444010 0��,� � 4. INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND DEWATERING PUMPING APPARATUS IF O
O LO
//1 �� ..�_ �j �I�� NEEDED TO DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED AREA. THE PUMP AND HOSE FOR THIS PURPOSE 0_ co
�. .�.�► SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA. THIS WATER WILL ALSO BE
CULVERT PIPE; PUMPED�5 N z PUMPED TO AN OUTFALL STABILIZED WITH CLASS A RIP RAP.
2"x 2"X 2'WOODEN AS NEEDED ':,t�► P� Q P 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE Z
STAKE ON 2'CENTERS NOTES: 5 � - REMOVAL OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE. WHEN DEWATERING AREA, ALL DIRTY WATER MUST BE O
EXISTING 4- PUMPED THROUGH A SILT BAG. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
GRADE I. EROSION CONTROL WATTLES OR COIR LOGS/WATTLES FLEXIBLE HOSE/PIPING STARTING WITH THE DOWNSTREAM DIKE FIRST. 0
MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF SILT FENCE. 6. ONCE THE WORKING AREA IS COMPLETED, REMOVE ALL RIP RAP AND IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND IfI
SLOPE 2. INSTLL A MINIMUM OF 2 UPSLOPE STAKES AND 4 STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH SEED AND MULCH.
7j\�� \ / _ \��� /�j DOWNSLOPE STAKES AT AN ANGLE TO WEDGE WATTLE PURPOSE: 7. ALL WORK IN CHANNEL MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE REMOVING IMPERVIOUS DIKE. (j
\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\/\77\\\7TC/ \ \\ \ \ IN PLACE. Z
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHOULD BE USED AT ALL POINTS WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE LEAVING A 0
�/�/�����\��\���\���\��\��\��\\�\ \\\ \\�� CONSTRUCTION SITE AND MOVING DIRECTLY ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD. INSTALL A CULVERT PIPE ACROSS THE
• � ENTRANCE WHEN NEEDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. O
MINIMUM 9" EROSION INSTALL WATTLE IN CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
FLOW
CONTROL COIR WATTLE/LOG 2"TO 3"TRENCH
I . CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AND Z
PROFILE VIEW EROSION CONTROL WATTLE PROPERLY GRADE IT. INTAKE HOSE
2. PLACE THE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL, AND SMOOTH IT. CLASS A CE }
NTS 3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR OTHER SUITABLE OUTLET. STONE 0 Ct
4. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRICS BECAUSE THEY IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO
SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE. AROUND Z a z
PUMP
0 CD 2
MAINTENANCE: �� � W =
WORK r r
j _IinDE WATERING AREA W W
rI
MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OK SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. PUMP =� CC CC 0_
THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH 2-INCH STONE. AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE %.
USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS
INSTALLATION NOTES: SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS, OR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS.
IMPERVIOUS
DIKE Q
SITE PREPARATION ;■1111 IMPERVIOUS DIKE Z
I I . GRADE AND COMPACT AREA. V*6-2 W J., 2. REMOVE ALL ROCKS, CLODS, VEGETATION, AND OBSTRUCTIONS SO THAT MATTING WILL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTUCTION ENTRANCE
HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE SOIL. - O�/
(13 3. PREPARE SEEDBED BY LOOSENING 3 TO 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL ABOVE FINAL GRADE. NTS Cr) Ld_
r 4.co ENGINEER.TEST OSAPOPLY ANY TREATMEN ANY NUTRIENT T SUCH AIES S LIMEDOK BERIT TILIZOEIL TEST RESULTS RS TO THE SOIL IF NEEDED. (44
Ip�ii•• `� �� CLASS A DISCHARGE HOSE Z U
m ,I �•t. STONE O
��O* �� _
0 SEEDING FLOW Q�� VIP NOTE: HOSE SHOULD BE H
Q I I . SEE PLANTING SHEETS FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS. • �` Aim/ Q I-
cn !�- KEPT OUTSIDE OF WORK
2. APPLY SEED TO SOIL BEFORE PLACING MATTING. KEY-IN MATTING - B # 5 WASHED STONE SILT BAG +`�� AREA 0
INSTALLATION -STREAM BANK I LOCATION �/ 0 u)
�..=... I- Z J
J NOTES: t MitiVjVjVjliVilil•.
Q I I . SEE GRADING NOTES ON PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS AND DETAIL SHEETS FOR .r,r,S,te,r.,r.,ree r
r r r� Z
j INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE COIR MATTING. 01-fi fotro
I I. CONSTRUCT DAM ACCORDING TO NCDENR ,a:� • •••••40 STABILIZED OUTFALL DI 2. OVERLAP ADJACENT MATS 6" (IN DIRECTION PARALLEL TO FLOW) AND ANCHOR EVERY 12" EROSION CONTROL MANUAL A �� � � �'�� A FILTER FABRIC 0 1-
F ACROSS THE OVERLAP. THE UPSTREAM MAT SHOULD BE PLACED OVER THE DOWNSTREAM r��rY�r���`frY_ CLASS A STONE 1 W
0 0 0
i MAT. 2. RIPRAP SHALL BE CLASS V� ••.•.•�' W Z 0
3. EDGES SHOULD BE SHINGLED AWAY FROM THE FLOW OF WATER. ---- / li--- 3. PLACE ROCK DAM AS SHOWN ON PLANS. •_•_• • -.-•-. W EXTEND CLASS B RIP RAP ROCK APRON 2 FEET p190„1„1„1„1„I�i
4. LAY MAT LOOSE TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH SOIL. DO NOT STRETCH TIGHT. 2.0' „_! • ! ! . • • ' 0
0 5. ANCHOR MAT USING BIODEGRADABLE STAKES. MIN.
DOWNSTREAM FROM TOE OF ROCK DAM I.O'THICK CLASS STAKE MATTING JUST
(3 6. EXTEND MAT 2 TO 3 FEET PAST TOP OF BANK. ABOVE CHANNEL TOE \ B ROCK APRON
7. PLACE ADJACENT ROLLS IN THE ANCHOR TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OVERLAP. B 0
0 AND BACKFILL W/
6 SECURE WITH BIODEGRADABLE STAKES, BACKFILL ANCHOR TRENCH, AND COMPACT SOIL. RIFFLE MATERIAL DISCHARGE Z
< 8. STAKE AT 12" INTERVALS ALONG OVERLAP. PLAN EXISTING HOSE
9. IF MORE THAN ROLL IS REQUIRED TO COVER THE CHANNEL FROM THE TOP OF BANK DOWN 0_
GROUND
TO THE TOE, THEN OVERLAP MATTING BY A MINIMUM OF I'. 2' MIN. FILTER FABRIC W +-� J J
a� 6" RIFFLE SPILLWAY CREST I' MIN OF# 5 IJ
\/-
Y1 r W(SPILLWAY) <
MATERIAL I I WASHED STONEW H
MIN. 2/3 STREAM WIDTH STABILIZED OUTFACE I5'TO 20' z 0 H
Q vim, CLASS A STONE I I H W 0 c�
CLASS B RIP RAP /l_wo ' :�,� O LL Z z
U EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE f���r�� � - __ W
LL FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: • • • • ��. � � � ••- '/ i
Z •��� '��. m FLOW •�. �.� /v.\\\*\i\\i\\///\\ \ //\ / , cc cc
I .0'THICK CLASS • • • • :.7 I� ► \�\\/ \�\\///\\ ---\ \�\\
• 100 % COCONUT FIBER(COIR)TWINE WOVEN INTO A B ROCK APRON '••�•�•�•�•�� � 6 �"f= BANKFULL _'�•� /\\/ \/\/\\/\\\j\/\\j\\/ j \\ \ \ o_ 0
o 0 0 0 0 o N 5%.. �o .o .o .o W
\ \ \
0 HIGH STRENGTH MATRIX. = = = = = = ="�, � � � � � . � � � i
o • THICKNESS 0.35 IN. MINIMUM. . . . . . . tY;_;_ .....,..,..,..,..
a • SHEAR STRESS-5 LBS/SQFT ,�
i.-•_-•_-•_-•_-•_-•_-•_ �r�r��• • • • • • • •- owe,* 8" OF CLASS A
• FLOW VELOCITY- OBSERVED 16 FT/SEC L'�'�'�'�'�'�'� N�I_�� ••�••�••�••�••�•I PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
in 111 STONE
I. tO4R1-.-.-.-, PROJECT MANAGER: MB
x • WEIGHT- 29 OZ/SY CUTOFF TRENCH 1� • ‘�1��1��1�
• OPEN AREA 38%
FILTER FABRIC EXISTING DESIGNED: SCF
• SLOPES UP TO A MAXIMUM OF I :I CHANNEL SILT BAG PROFILEDRAWN: SCF
SECTION B B CHECKED: AFM
CLASS B FILTER FABRIC
0)
ww RIP RAP SECTION A A SHEET NUMBER:
Li
COI MATTING
z NTS TEMPORARY . OCK CHECK DAM P P D D W I DETAIL Dl
L
NTS NTS
I

c 1 r
COIR FIBER
MATTING
INSTALL LIVESTAKES 0.75"TO 2" DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
16' MAX. AROUND MEANDER 1.1
I I_ USING THE KBC PLANTING BARPres
BENDS INSTALL LIVESTAKES FLAT TOP END
LINE POST WOVEN WIRE BARBED OR LINE POST - + + +++++ + + AROUND STRUCTURES ++ \
= LIVESTAKE
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
ELECTRIC WIRE + + + + + + + + + . 2.0'
■ ■ ++++ + + ++++ + LATERAL BUD
_7 - - r
■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■ + + + + o� ° 1 .o' 2 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■ - � I / I ~_I I Raleigh, NC 27612
■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■ i 1
1:-11=11 11:-11=1 ARP- i` 11-11:=1 -1:=11= -11.=11.=111
■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■ N TOB 11.=11. 11.=11.=11F 11.=11.=► 1.=11.=11. 11-11.=h IL=11.=11.= Main: 919.829.9909
1=11.=11.= 1.-11.=11.=1 =11.=1IP ti 11=11=1 -1,11. ,�=11=11=11
■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■ T- - O O 41=11=11 1_1=11=11 '.11.=1I=.11!+ 1.=11.=1L 10:II=.1L:.11.=11.=11.=
■ / L=11.=11=..1-11=11=1 =11=1L=A=11=11=1 -1,-1L=►1=1L=1L=n www.res.us
\ ,. SIDE BRANCH 1 IIFFIIFFII'?IIFy11Fy11F I1=E=II.'�IFFIIFFII. I IIFilIFilIFilIFilIF
1= Zylo REMOVED AT 1�11.�11.= h11=11�1 RIERI1P11=1E1�1 II11=11II11RIEIIIER
Ell II1 I I1= z Engineering Services Provided By:
- - _ SLIGHT ANGLE O
11 11
LINE PANEL I I . INSERT 2. REMOVE 3. INSERT Angler Environmental, LLC
++++ ++++ ` �_ PLANTING BAR AS PLANTING BAR PLANTING BAR 2
++++++ + ++++++ WATER TABLE NWS SHOWN AND PULL AND PLACE INCHES TOWARD License: F-1428
+ : + + + + V V HANDLE TOWARD SEEDING AT PLANTER FROM SEAL
+ + - - COIR FIBER PLANTER. CORRECT DEPTH. SEEDING.
+ - -
�I MATTI N G
® LIVESTAKE SPACING
SMALL CHANNEL
BARBED OR LINE POST PLAN VIEW r► Aim*
ELECTRIC WIRE
45 DEGREE
TAPERED BUTT END
3" MIN. - DETAIL
4"TO 6" WOVEN WIRE: MP I:1 a II'11:II II1:11 11`L 11:11:IIF411:11:11:�1:IIE =11 JI:=1�•"I:11:IL11:11:
TOP AND BOTTOM WIRES MIN. 12 GAUGE. 3.0' '11'11:�11,,111 111=111= 1I= 1111:11:11i111:111L11i Iti= :11:11:10011:1111=
LIVESTAKE �1_I:�R,11.=11.=11.l I_1.= 11.=1L?IL=11 I C ,0.11 1:,1 m1111.L
WOVEN WIRE INTERMEDIATE AND STAY WIRES MIN. LARGE CHANNEL : Ilr 1111.=11.=11 11. 11:=11.=11.=11.=11i =11.=�1.=11. 1L
_._c(-
H :11:=11:#11:=11 11 11- um =11 II II=11=
GROUND LINE N
z I2 1/2 GAUGE. SPACING = I 5 11.=11.=11 11 11 11 =11F. IL-11 11 .ILIL �J
= H
n r,
SMALL CHANNEL I /
"- \ SPACING MATTINGCOIR . PUSH G. LEAVE
ER - O \ O • 4. PULL�prr, BAR TOWARD HANDLE OF HANDLE COMPACTION
IL II- \/\/\ / �`I TOD PLANTER, FIRMING FORWARD HOLE OPEN.
♦� SOIL AT BOTTOM. FIRMING SOIL WATER
� `� � AT TOP. THOROUGHLY.
� /` ��
•
VAA VA VAA, I.�, ♦ . . " ill***
�� ��� � / / :�:� o O.O : �•: •
/ /\ \ „, �/ ��\� �i� �i�� �� COIR FIBER
WOVEN WIRE WITH ONE BARB DETAIL A V�\�V�V � � /�� A�VA� ��� �������i%������ ���• MATTING
NWS ♦ ������ � � � ��
\ / //\ / //\ / ����i�`����`����`����i• �`.NWS
NOTES: \ \ /\/ / / /\/ / /
\ // / / LIVESTAKE SPACING _
1 . LINE POSTS (WOODEN): MIN. 4 IN. DIAM. OK 4 IN. SQUARE. \\/\/ /\/ LARGE CHANNEL PLANTING NOTES: ' i' ! NOTES:
2. LINE POSTS (STEEL): STUDDED OR PUNCHED T, U, OR Y SHAPED, WITH ANCHOR PLATES. //\/\/\/ /
3. MIN. WEIGHT I .3 LBS./FT. (EXCLUDING ANCHOR PLATE). POSTS SHALL BE DRIVEN A MINIMUM NOTES: PLANTING BAG I
BARE ROOTS SHALL BE PLANTED 6
DURING PLANTING, SEEDLINGS SHALL
OF 18" DEEP AND MUST BE AT LEAST 5.5 FT IN LENGTH FT. TO I O FT. ON CENTER,
4. SPECIES AND TREATMENT FOR ALL WOOD: USE UNTREATED DURABLE POSTS OF SPECIES BE KEPT IN A MOIST CANVAS BAG OR
I I . SEE TABLE ON PLANTING SHEET FOR ACCEPTABLE SPECIES AND COMPOSITION. SIMILAR CONTAINER TO PREVENT THE )' , RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8
SUCH AS RED CEDAR, BLACK LOCUST OR OSAGE-ORANGE WITH BARK REMOVED, OR 2. LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE 2 TO 3 FEET LONG AND 0.75 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER. ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING. FT. ON CENTER, APPROXIMATELY
NON-DURABLE WOOD THAT IS PRESERVATIVE PRESSURE TREATED (0.40 LBS./CUBIC FOOT TYPICAL SECTION 3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED ON I .5'ALTERNATING SPACING ON LARGE CHANNELS (POOL 680 PLANTS PER ACRE.
CCA, OR EQUIVALENT NON-CCA TREATMENT). DO NOT USE RED PINE. DEPTH > 2FT) AND I .0' ALTERNATING SPACING ON SMALL CHANNELS (POOL DEPTH < 2FT). KBC PLANTING BAR
4. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED ON ALL RESTORATION REACHES AND ALONG ALL ENHANCEMENT PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A BLADE
REACHES AS SHOWN ON LIVE STAKE SHEET(S). WITH A TRIANGULAR CROSS SECTION, W
AND SHALL BE 12 INCHES LONG, 4 I-
LIVE STAKING INCHES WIDE AND I INCH THICK AT Q
CENTER. o NO
WOVEN WI�E FENCE (N GCS DETAIL 382A) NTS ROOT PRUNING O
ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT C
PRUNED, IF NECESSARY, SO THAT NO
NTS ROOTS EXTEND MORE THAN I O
INCHES BELOW THE ROOT COLLAR. Z
11 0
EXCAVATE/ GRADE UPPER BANK 0
D
%\ / / / /\ /\/% //\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ INSTALL LIVE STAKES F-
\/\\ \//jam/jam/jamjamjamj\� //jam/jam/jam/jam/ //\//�//�\ PER DETAIL Z
TOP OF BANK TOE OF BANK \\ �\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\/%//%\\/%\\/\ \//\/ / EXISTING CHANNEL BANK Z
RIP RAP APPROACH \/7\// //, j , ///\/\ / //\//\///\ 0
�5' MIN)_ - TIMBER MAT CROSSING _ - TIMBER MAT APPROACH J /\�///\\/\\\/\\/ %\�,\\/\\,/i, //\\//\\\ BASE .00T PLANTING o
////j\//\ \ \/ • /\%j\/j\ NTS U-
TI E TO EXISTING MIN SLOPE 2 0 HA V DE \ /\\/\/ - - \ Q
SEE PLANS-I T FOR �\ \/\/\/\/\ \//\ Z
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
FLOW PARALLEL PROPOSED SLOPE \ \ \ \ \ \ V V VCLASSB RIP RAP
INSTALL COIR MATTING \\/\\/\ \ \ \ \ 0
Q PER DETAIL \.�\ \\\ \\ \\ \\\\ � 0 Z
i
0
EXISTING 0 U) 2
r
CHANNEL BED CT)
g W
I .1"0 lap
I W J
w
WOO.
0Ii` w w 0-
NOTES: BENCH VARIES ' To �_ � a
SEE PLAN SHEETS in i.
•IVe P010c i. 5 5 I I. SEED AND MULCH ALL BANKS PRIOR TO INSTALLING FOR WIDTH z
h".... COIR MATTING. A
�Sdap
root
'
��;�� CARRIAGE BOLT z
tern# -YPICAL BANK GRADING N%1 in
0) I"e"11/ 0 0 0 0 NTS ,.,
co co :/ /11 1 %
0 III a/� R R R 'VII iii.,\ O
Q TIMBER MAT
co (TP) NEW CHANNEL TO BE - fn W/
CONSTRUCTED �� y� V
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED H 0 J
•TCQ PERPENDICULAR G w
o NOTES:
=I PLAN VIEW MIN. 25' 0 F- W
u) I I .
TIMBER MATS SHALL BE USED FOR TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO TRAVERSE WET AND/OR MUDDY OLD CHANNEL TO BE 0
li
CHANNEL PLUG MAX• 75' W
rn DIVERTED OR ABANDONEDD
CO o ARES ADJACENT TO THE STREAM AND TO CROSS THE EXISTING CHANNEL - - O
STREAM AND OTHER CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS. TOP OF BANK
0
CARRIAGE BOLT TIMBER MAT INSTALLED 2. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN FLOW IS 0 U
0 (TYP) LOW. THERE SHALL BE MINIMAL TO NO DISTURBANCE OF THE Z
PERPENDICULAR
0 CHANNEL BED AND BANKS AS A RESULT OF INSTALLING THE
Q CLASS B RIP RAP TIMBER MAT APPROACHES OK CROSSING. PLAN VIEW Q
U TOP OF BANK INSTALLED PARALLEL UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL BOTTOM OF �j\/ //\ \, W
15 3. THE LENGTH OF TIMBER MAT REQUIRED TO CROSS THE 1 .5' MINIMUM EXISTING CHANNEL \//\/, / //\/\\\ /\\j\ Lij
°� STREAM OR CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS SHALL BE SUCH BANKFULL ELEVATION /\\\ /\%\\\ \ \�\\\ \\� \\/\ \///\\ � J W
�� 0 0 0 0 '\i\.„-. \\/i\i\\�\\//\/\\ \//\i\\ / \ W Q �_
� 02 11111i111111 THAT THE TIMBER MAT EXTENDS PAST THE TOP OF BANK ON
\i\\i\\�\i\i\\\/\�\�\\i\\�\i\�\\\/ \i\\i\\�\' Q
c �• �• �• EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE TO //\/\\///\ / / ,,, , \\//\/ . Z
//\ \\ \ \ \/ \
/ / / � / �/ �/ ,/ � / / / / / / 30' \\!/�i/\\\\\\! �/\\,\\\! \\/X\ \ \ \\\,A W 0
Q /\ \/\/\/\/\ \ / / � SUPPORT THE MAXIMUM EQUIPMENT SIZE USING THE , , ~
D \\ //\\j/ j/ j/ j/ / / /\\j/\\j/\\j/\\j/\\j/\\j/\\j/\\j/ j/ j/ j/\\j/��i , U LL z Z_
°� /\\/ / /\/\/\/\/ G.
\ \ /\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\\/%\\A ��\/\/� 4. STROEAMNCROSSINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE TIMBER FINISHED GRADE\\ \\ \� NEW CHANNEL BANK SHALL W Q
U \\\\\/ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ /\ /\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\// MAT LENGTHS ORIENTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE TOPS OF COMPACTED BACKFILL \=/ //\ -/\/ \ BE TREATED AS SPECIFIED 0 �/ Q
1 / COMPACTED BACKFILL
Z \ ,,\///.\//\//\//.\//.\/\//\, \/,,K1\\/�\\s\\\,\\�/\ /// // // // // // // //\/// ` IN PLANS (I 2"TO 18" LIFTS)
\ \\ \ !\�%/%\��/\��\ SHALLTBEANSTALLED W TIH THE TIMBER MAT LENGTHS
(I 2" LIFTS) I I O' MIN NOTES:
FILTER FABRIC / ORIENTED PARALLEL TO THE TOPS OF THE STREAM BANKS.
o TOE OF BANK 5. STREAM CROSSING APPROACHES FROM DRY AREAS SHALL I I. FILL EXISTING CHANNEL TO TOP OF BANK ELEVATION
(TYP) APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
n BE CONSTRUCTED USING CLASS B RIP RAP PLACED OVER WHEN POSSIBLE.
0) WATER SURFACE FILTER FABRIC. 2. CHANNEL MUST BE FILLED IN 12"TO 18" LIFTS, PROJECT MANAGER: MB
PROPOSED o 6. ALL TIMBER MATS, FILTER FABRIC, AND RIP RAP SHALL BE 3. IF CHANNEL CANNOT BE COMPLETELY FILLED TO DESIGNED: SCF
o COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE WHEN THE CROSSING CHANNEL INVERT TOP OF BANK, FILL TO TOP OF BANK FOR 25' OUT
-0 IS REMOVED. OF EVERY 100'SEGMENT.
DRAWN: SCF
SECTION VIEW CHECKED: AFM
IMPERVIOUS SELECT MATERIAL
w (PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER) TYPICAL SECTION OPTIONAL SHEET NUMBER:
L TOE PROTECTION
di
CHANNEL BACKFILL
z TIN/BE� MAT TEN/PORA�Y CROSSING CHANNEL PLUG NTS D2
w NTS
NTS
.✓ I

1 r 1
INSTALL COIR, MATTING PER DETAIL
SEE DWG D I
KEY COIR, MATTING NOTES: INSTALL COIK
INTO BANK COMPACTED SOIL LIFT MATTING PER DETAIL
I I. OVER EXCAVATE THE OUTSIDE BEND OF THE CHANNEL. INSTALL
MIN 2.0' SMALLER BRANCHES AND BRUSH AND COMPACT LIGHTLY TOGETHER. KEY COIR MATTING LIVE STAKES
LIVE STAKESPres
BACKFILL AND COMPACT TO LOCK IN PLACE. INTO BANK
\� 2. PLACE LIVE CUTTINGS OVER THE SMALL BRANCHES AND BRUSH. SEE COMPACTED SOIL LIFT 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
\� TOP OF BANK PLANTING TABLE ON SHEET P I FOR ACCEPTABLE LIVE CUTTING AND MIN 2.0' TOP OF BANK NOTES: Raleigh, NC 27612
LIVE CUTTINGS LIVE STAKE SPECIES. CUTTINGS SHOULD BE RINSED AT CUTTING f► LIVE CUTTINGS
POINT TO ALLOW BETTER ROOTING. Main: 919.829.9909
//�\//\\/) ` 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL(COIR) MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL \/\ ��' ROCK SHALL BE EVEN WITH DESIGNED BANK I . OVER EXCAVATE THE OUTSIDE BEND OF THE CHANNEL. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC, www.res.us
\/`, \ SMALL BRANCHES PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. COIR MATTING SHOULD BE KEYED INTO / /') SLOPE. AVOID EXCESSIVE ROCK PROTUSION BASE STONE LAYER AND COMPACT. INSTALL TOP STONE LAYER, BACKFILL AND
/\ _ _ AND BRUSH / / /� TOP OF BANK. \j\\ \ ` ' FROM BANK. COMPACT TO LOCK IN PLACE.
/ / 4. INSTALL I TO 3 ROWS OF LIVE STAKES ABOVE THE LIVE CUTTINGS // / 2. PLACE LIVE CUTTINGS OVER THE RIPRAP. SEE PLANTING TABLE ON SHEET P I Engineering Services Provided By:
\ tom__ NWS \ \��\ LAYER PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. MINIMUM I O" INTERMEDIATE / \` FOR ACCEPTABLE LIVE CUTTING AND LIVE STAKE SPECIES. CUTTINGS SHOULD
�\ y��T \\ \\ \\ /\� ` DIAMETER STONE /\\/ BE RINSED AT CUTTING POINT TO ALLOW BETTER ROOTING. Angler Environmental, LLC
/,- ���—� / // / / / `/\ / /\/ 3. INSTALL COMPACTED SOIL LIFT. COIR MATTING SHOULD BE WRAPPED UNDER License: F-1428
1/2 MAX POOL DEPTH `���� /- \\ \\ \\ \\\\ �� p NWS /\/\/\ SOIL LIFT AND KEYED INTO TOP OF BANK.
/� \� �� l►��r �j 6 / / / I/2 MAX POOL DEPTH \\/ / /� 4. INSTALL I TO 3 ROWS OF LIVE STAKES ABOVE THE LIVE CUTTINGS LAYER PER SEAL
�� J / \ / �� _� \/ 5. FILTER FON ABROIC SHALL MEETSPECIFICATIONS FOR NCDOT WOVEN FILTER
/ / / /� �/ \� \ \ A / f7? / / / \ FABRIC.
\\/ ��\ \��\\ \\\/\\/\\//\\/\\ // MIN 0.5 // _ — \/
SECTION A-A . ,��►a����I.'�►'�� .> COIR MATTING \//A/�A
�10'� ���,01' r� v,,�� ,������ MIN FILTER
,,,"&�`<,�.z(V ic-'�5�,� *Air ►0,*/' 4�►•��.
��'1�,*t4-�•,.4 .,4..41. ��• �,A040I�I. , ,'�A* �2.0' FABRIC
,� 1 .4����* .40.I,,.T�r+l o� SECTION A A
CHANNEL TOP 1t.-
'
OF BANK 411( `' ���,
STONE TOE PROTECTION
NTS
,(5
A
CHANNEL BOTTOM
OF BANK
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL BOTTOM DUCKBILL ANCHOR
OF BANK I PROPOSED (OR EQUIVALENT)
COARSE AGGREGATE STREAM BED
POINT REFERENCED BACKFILL WITH COARSE
BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) IN STRUCTURE TABLE; FLOWAGGREGATE (SEE NOTE#2)
BUSH TOE (SMALL CHANNEL) NON-WOVEN TOLERANCE ± O. I' MIN. 5.0'
A SEE PROFILE FOR
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ?\ \ POOL DEPTH I-
NTS (NCDOT TYPE II) j/ \� a a _ Q O
Fr - 2\'-`7; I-
4t44'
*t6r(y
r�o�o�o �111o41110 off. \ \ \ \ \
LOw _�_-_ �•I BACKFILL WITH COARSE \\ii \ ��\ \ \ \ \ \ a
-Oi
AGGREGATE (SEE NOTE#2) \ /\/ / • \��' / / / / / / —
�i�.__ - :_may- -- - ; \ � \\\// jA\\/\,/i\��\\/\
NOTES: ' O O O �'Gy B GEOTEXTIOLE FABRIC
�O A � � i `< (NCDOT TYPE II) / \//` Ct
I. LOG VANES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OR MORE LOGS HELD IN PLACE BY EITHER BALLAST BOULDERS, DUCKBILL �� '�� • • • •'
�����.ita O2�O� oO�o01 Z 2p° 300 POINT REFERENCED IN ANCHORS, OR REBAR. LOGS SHALL BE MIN DIAM. = I O" OF RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD, RECENTLY HARVESTED. -3 �� = = < TACK FABRIC
r>> THE LENGTH SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE LOG IS BURIED INTO THE SOIL OF THE STREAM BANK(ON ONE END) AND STREAM
TO LOG O
STRUCTURE TABLE; BRUSH TOE PROTECTION rC �' O
BED (ON THE OTHER END) A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 4.0'. FLAT-SIDED BALLAST BOULDERS SHALL BE OF SIZE 2'X 2'X .- �� 5.0' SECTION A-A' (OPT I )
TOLERANCE ± O. I LENGTH = BKF WIDTH P: Ct
/ I .5' OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER. (UNLESS OTHERWISE
tlit
2. COARSE AGGREGATE BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF AN EQUAL MIX OF#57 STONE, SURGE STONE, AND CLASS A RIPRAP. NOTED ON THE PLANS) ��r`, ® MIN 0
4. I 3. THE VANE SHALL INTERCEPT THE STREAM BANK AT A HEIGHT EQUAL TO BETWEEN %2 BANKFULL STAGE AND BANKFULL �� LL
�.� ��r STAGE. AN ELEVATION CONTROL POINT MAY BE ESTABLISHED AT THE LEFT OR RIGHT STREAM BANK/VANE INTERCEPT LL
I 0
/ POINT. THE STRUCTURE ANGLE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM A POINT TANGENT TO THE VANE INTERCEPT IN RELATION TO
THE DIRECTION OF FLOW. I Z
4. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE GAPS BETWEEN THE LOGS AND UNDER THE COARSE BACKFILL MATERIAL fY }
OF THE VANE. THERE SHALL BE NO GEOTEXTILE FABRIC VISIBLE IN THE FINISHED WORK; EDGES SHALL BE FOLDED
DUCKBILL ANCHOR 0 Ct
COARSE AGGREGATE TUCKED, OR TRIMMED AS NEEDED. CHANNEL TOP I OR EQUIVALENT) 0 Z
BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) 5. LOG VANES SHALL BE BUILT TYPICALLY AS FOLLOWS: PROPOSED ( (/)
q OF BANK \ STREAM BED Z
A. OVER EXCAVATE STREAM BED TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE TOTAL THICKNESS OF THE HEADER(AND FOOTER IFW
SPECIFIED) LOGS. SCOUR POOL 0
BANK INTERCEPT POINT q' B. PLACE FOOTER LOG OF THE VANE ARM IF SPECIFIED. THE SLOPE OF THE VANE ARM IS MEASURED ALONG THE \ FLOW ( W J
(SEE NOTE#3) VANE ARM WHICH IS INSTALLED AT AN ANGLE TO THE STREAM BANK AND PROFILE. \ MIN. 5.0' J W
POOL SEE PROFILE FOR W W rI
C. INSTALL HEADER LOG OF THE VANE ARM ON TOP OF AND SLIGHTLY FORWARD OK BACK FROM THE FOOTER LOG. '�` _ POOL DEPTH a
D. NAIL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO THE HEADER LOG USING A GALVANIZED NAIL WITH A PLASTIC CAP. THE SIZE AND
f
GAGE OF NAIL AND NAIL SPACING SHALL BE SCIFID BY THE DSIGNR.. \. PLACE COARSE BACFILL BHIND LOGS ENSURING THAT ANY VOIDS BTWN THE LOGS ARE FILLD. \G. BACFILL RMAINDR OF VANE WITH PRVIOUSLY EXCAVATED MATERIAL. \ A4
�. IF ANY EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS SPCIFID FOR USE IN THE VICINITY OF THE STRAM BAN VANE INTERCET POINT \ /, THE MATTING EDGES SHALL BE NEATLY SECURED AROUND THE LOGS. \ \\/D•,A• /\\/\\/ / LLI J
BACKFILL WITH COARSE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
.� \I AGGREGATE (SEE NOTE#2) / / / / O
`J J / \\// /\// / //\ Cr) r2
crs /\ "\\/\./ / \/� /\/�/i \ Q
NoN_wovm \ GEOTEXTII LE FABRIC \// 0 U
CI (NCDOT TYPE II)in I= _
Q
I: \ TYPICAL PLAN VIEW TACK FABRIC
SECTION A-A' (OPT 2)
TO LOG 0 Cl)
cri
—IQ
POINT REFERENCED IN CC
in BALLAST BOULDER STRUCTURE TABLE; G Q
0 I BANKFULL OR DUCKBILL ANCHORS COIR MATTING TOLERANCE ± O.I' 0 I- I—
w
u w z 0
PLAN VIEW FLOW in V w D
co
HEADER LOG I - 3% HIGH O
0 3%TO 7% ----� LOW k 0
STREAM BANK ________-_1
U BANKFULL \/ //\/�I \ ---- 3 z
\ \ � _
/\ /' ' /\/\/ / NOTES: di _
a)aa) COARSE AGGREGATE L ______T.,777- / / / / / 2 0 W
/ BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) / POOL /\�/ r I I . LOGS SHOULD BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD AND RECENTLY HARVESTED. Q 0 j \ \ //�\// / �/\\ / FOOTER LOG 2. COARSE AGGREGATE BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF AN EQUAL MIX OF#57 STONE, ~ w
Q / `/ SURGE STONE, AND CLASS A RIPRAP. w 0
w \ \\/\ \�\\/ /\ 3. HIGH SIDE OF LOG SHALL BE APPROX. 0.2' HIGHER THAN LOW END. 0 Z z
ID I, RD2 (MS/DS): �/
\/\ . �/�� � /\// // //, / 4. LOG DIMENSIONS: LLJ
/ . e,� iS� PTIrft� STREAM BED MIN DIAM. = I 2", MIN LENGTH = 14' 0= L.I_ 0=
U \/ 1 ,l,..1,...��-. c. DUCKBILL ANCHORS (OR 0 Q
z �9I��I�9I��►,. IN POOL
:,� �� �� .� EQUIVALENT) INSTALLED MIN DIAM. = I O", MIN LENGTH = 13'
/\ a. /c• PROFILE VIEW PER MANUFACTURERS RD2 (US), RD3, RD4:
U ; /\ \\/\ /\ \ INSTRUCTIONS (TYP.) SECTION B-B'
.o \ \ 5. NAIL FILTER FABRIC USING 3" I OD GALVANIZED COMMON NAIL EVERY I .5'ALONG
a NON RIOC EN GEOTYPEI II) / / /\/\ \ \ THE LOG PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
o \//\ \ \
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
L DESIGNED: SCF
a / BANK WIL?) / DRAWN: SCF
o \\\\ /\\/\\ \\ CHECKED: AFM
0)
cc SECTION A-A' SHEET NUMBER:
di LOG VANE
z
NTS LOG SILL
w NTS D3
J_
L_
J I

c 1 r 1
FLOW
CHANNEL BOTTOM res
OF BANK
LIVE STAKES FLOW
• A CHANNEL BOTTOM 0
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
OF BANK �'>N\� Raleigh, NC 27612
O XmA zMain: 919.829.9909
•
rt.13.041:
• • z BANKFULL •
Y iiiiii•�i:iiii••iiiiiii '� www.res.us
• • • C
....................
ift8
• • COARSEAGGREGATE ��•�•• IU N BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) _ _ ••,..•••••••••••,
Engineering Services Provided By:
re Angler Environmental, LLC
SMALL BRANCHES � � � �O �O�Dt License: F-1428
.5' O O0411190411044111111
O O O O O
����
,`\ .7ai a AND BRUSH
��i=`���.���I��:�� i, lad S,� ` �� � �
-\01APlI/I r �� 'i,�-A1,-;�v�44i LIVE STAKES SMALL LOGS AND/OR SEAL
—\��` i'� � y� ,y,//��, � _.I�li��- � LARGE BRANCHES WITH A �O O O O O O O
\��u�Y _y � g4--,/,i/`11 -,1��'�`` /fir '11!i4�� 1� MIN DIAMETER OF 4". B 3 PRIMARY ROCK DIMENSIONS.
�� 4LN ire �� ,
��\� ` Ilia v1ll IILI/)11,
t III�:� PROPOSED ��1�1`1�\� ) rBBAL • \���� •����% ��' .1� � �� 5 STREAM BED ��
� X. LONGEST DIMENSION
MIN 3 O' ��� �� I
CHANNEL TOP � �� Y. SHORTEST DIMNSION
� i1I(
OBANK FLOW' 1;�I • �Z 1 POOL
,� z \ \\ \\ \\ � \ \ , \ STRUCTURE MINIMUM BOULDER SIZE
if./ • �// / / / // /,/// // MIN _ REACH DIMENSION LE NTG H (IN.)
LIVE STAKES \ \ \\ \ \\� \ \/ \\ CHANNEL TOP
N //\�/\ / / // j �/ OF BANK X 12
A \ \\ \\/\\/\\/ \/\/\/\/\//\\//\\//\\\ Z 12
1.1
SECTION A-A TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
z
LIVE STAKES
O 4" CEDAR POST
\ \ \ It .II P'—ie ` / \/\/\/\/\/\/\/ NOTES:
N MIN
//\//\/\\//\//\% / `L� `m _ MI ..!- �"I r / /\\ \ \/\\ \ \ \ \\ \ I DRIVE 2 RPOAST MVV5O N4" CE MUM D PTDAR O AS STSO OWN IMUN 3' SILL CONTROL POINT ELEVATION
// // // // // / / ,/ // // // // // // // // // // 2. FILL THE VOID BETWEEN POST ROWSWIAN EVEN MIX
\ \ \ \ \,/ j j ; \\ \\ \ �j \ j \j� ,�jj j/\ % OF HARDWOOD LOGS, LIMBS, AND BRUSH AS SHOWN. PROPOSED HEADER BOULDER
\ \ \ \ \\• i� \ �" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3. REDUCE POST SPACING AS NEEDED TOIMPROVE
//\//\//\//\//\/ / j" \ \, V / /\ • \ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ STREAM BED
/ / / / / / /\ // // // // // // // // // // // // STRUCTURE STABILITY. SCOUR POOL
\\%\\%\\%\\%\\� V /\\/ / /I//\\ % ` %\ `
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ /\ \ \�\ \ \ \/\ \\ \/\/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ 4• SEE PLANTING LIVE STAKE SPECIES EC IB LSE ON S H E ET P I FOR ACCEPTABLE FL w
i /i /i /i /i /i:/i i //. //�/i�/i�/i :/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/i�/, OW H
—_ MIN. 5.0' SEE PROFILE FOR Q
POOL DEPTH CI 0
o SECTION B B \ \// / -�- _,� _1 i
\ / /\74046W41 -- /\-<<-7 /.
COARSE AGGREGATE / \ .�.�. , \ '�\\'\\\\\\\\\ 0
BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) //\// -wile*
TT7_ ///\/ \/ \ \\/ U
E N G I N E S E D SEDIMENT PACK (ESP) / //\//�\//i\//i\\// i\//i\/// /� /
FILTER FABRIC \�\ / F-
NTS (804.2. I I CLASS 2) r/)
FOOTER BOULDER Z
0
SECTION A-A C.)
fl
u_
I—
O
FLOW Z
NOTES: 0 Q
I . TYPICAL RIFFLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL NEWLY GRADED CHANNEL SECTIONS Z 0
THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PLAN SHEETS. Q J
LARGE COBBLE/SMALL 2. ELEVATION CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF PROPOSED STREAM SILL CONTROL POINT j w LU
BOULDERS, TYP RIFFLE POINTS TO ESTABLISH PART OF THE PROFILE OF THE CHANNEL. SURVEY OF BANK ELEVATION W W a
CHANNEL CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH ACCURATE RIFFLE INSTALLATION
BOTTOM WIDTH TOP OF BANK WITHIN A TOLERANCE OF ±0.2'. TOP OF BANK
_ eb 3. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPRISED OF 757o ROCKS AND 25% WOODY MATERIAL. HEADER BOULDER, TYPICAL
fi _• c* ..% _• » WOODY MATERIAL SMALL CONSIST OF LOGS, BRANCHES, AND BRUSH NO GREATER
w`1o`•! •`•— I • , \\//\\/\\/\\/\\ \ /\\/\\//\\//\\//\\// THAN 3" IN DIAMETER. THE ROCK MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF NATIVE SUBSTRATE ,-Y // // // // / / / / / / / Q
�!�•��;7��=!;'s4 �•+��� / / MATERIAL WHEN POSSIBLE. NATIVE MATERIAL SHALL BE EXCAVATED, STOCKPILED, AND /\/\/\/\/\ f \/\/\/\/\/\ z
h ' .04 ' ,� / / / // �\//,� RE USED FROM ABANDONED CHANNEL SECTIONS. IF A SUITABLE QUANTITY OF NATIVE \ / / / / / / /
-lost; Ve,cY , ,T ' /\/\`l \ \ \ \/ / /\ SUBSTRATE MATERIAL CANNOT BE HARVESTED, CONTRACTOR MAY SUBSTITUTE THE \i\\�\\/\\j\\/\\ \ \\/\\j\\j\\/\\ O
A • • ��•/��•�•���� A 0.75' MIN // E Aw is g ti / / RIFFLE MATERIAL WITH ROCK MATCHING THE COMPOSITION IN TABLE I I . �/
, i./ A, • \\/\\/\\/\\` ��C:_ '„�Y� �' s��� _� "�,, i\ \ \\/\ 4. THE PLACEMENT OF RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER TO CREATE A \ u) Ld_
.4;gPa�i:�'li,IM \ \ \ ' «_'��'a''ti� �°, ' ue, \ \
cn �►�•�` rr atei,•�� 7c .•..��z•` .�►� / / SMOOTH PROFILE, WITH NO ABRUPT "JUMP" (TRANSITION) BETWEEN THE UPSTREAM ,r , ,r ( ,r ,r
m t:0110 ,1 .���:V,�.�:I / _ s / l __ _)\_
��•�r•% � �•�� \/ \/ \ \ PROPOSED BETWEEN THE RIFFLE AND THE DOWNSTREAM RUN-POOL. THE FINISHED CROSS O
p •04;0+=4 4030:� TOE OF BANK STREAM BED
SECTION OF THE RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL GENERALLY MATCH THE SHAPE AND
u •.=.=0� t04%,� �:� \/\\/\// // \ DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH SOME VARIABILITY OF THE
\//%//\/\//\ / THALWEG LOCATION AS A RESULT OF THE SMALL POOLS AND LOGS. FOOTER BOULDER, TYPICAL 2//
' RIFFLE MATERIAL; 5. THE END OF RIFFLE CONTROL POINT MAY TIE IN TO ANOTHER IN-STREAM STRUCTURE
���- �f�� ���������� SEE TABLE
ui iitpr, `scY•"��� �'� (LOG SILL , J-HOOK, ETC.). NO LOGS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF SECTION B B I— O (f�
���'�1; s, e�•s�ll►, f — z J
Q 11��: ,.��, ,0�. a THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE.
v s�•�� CC
w II Cge'1 • `j • • • CROSS SECTION A-A' 6. THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SHALL BE KEYED IN TO THE STREAM BANKS AND/OR BED AS G
O a 4►►s� i�i�,i�iri�i� Q
Gc�ii..•��`�•�'?r�•�, DESIGNATED BY THE DESIGNER. THE "KEY" SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE TOP OF BANK l—
_ a�►iten.�.�:>�Atiaa AT THE BEGINNING (CREST) AND END OF THE RIFFLE. WHERE PRESERVATION OF 0 W
• 1WrrI �,t+ l�, EXISTING STREAM BANK VEGETATION IS A PRIORITY A "KEY" MAY NOT BE USED (OR THE
LARGE COBBLE/ d��`�f �L. 4 `� DIMENSIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE. NOTES: W
co o SMALL BOULDERS i..��N�.`,�,' iai�.�l V)
O �•�o1 � �r�C � � I I . SEE STRUCTURE BOULDER SIZE TABLE FOR MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF BOULDERS. THE UPPER LIMIT FOR BOULDER SIZES O
p ����,����r11�•��p•m SHOULD BE NO MORE ThAT 20% OF THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SIZE AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR 0 0
••�•�� �\�•s•�• :•�� BEGIN RIFFLE VARIES PER PROFILE PROPOSED TOP
Q ri ' ���������� CONTROL POINT OF BANK TABLE I - STONE COMPOSITION TO INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURE. Z
0 .•s• .•a.. s•�w�•�4 2. COARSE AGGREGATE BACKFILL SMALL CONSIST OF AN EQUAL MIX OF #57 STONE, SURGE STONE, AND CLASS A RIPRAP. Q W
1 IekA•�`OW9W `-1 RIFFLE MATERIAL; TARGET D50 3. THE BOULDER SILL IS GENERALLY CONSTRUCTED AS FOLLOWS: lii Lii
a� W.,iilfbloilek, / �X END RIFFLE EACH STONE SIZE % JJa� w •'m SEE TABLE I (MM) A. PLACE FOOTER BOULDERS. A LAYER OF BEDDING MATERIAL UNDER THE FOOTER BOULDERS MAY BE SPECIFIED BY 2 0co s -� CONTROL POINT Q I—
ii��-�-N�� ,�. h RD I , RD2 SURGE 20 THE DESIGNER. THERE SMALL BE NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS. z W 0
c �•�•�•'• r•�•� � B. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC. W 0
0 02021Gy01,�4;01I GLIDE (MS/DS), RD3, #3 30 33 R— 0
a0 •Y•.�:�.—•�•�w��•�� FLOWir RUN RD4 #57 50 C. PLACE COURSE BACKFILL BEHIND THE FOOTER BOULDERS. W L- Z z
„ • I Ito r SURGE 20 D. INSTALL HEADER BOULDERS ON TOP OF AND SET SLIGHTLY BACK FROM THE FOOTER BOULDERS (SUCH THAT PART QU ' �`��'r'� OF THE HEADER BOULDER IS RESTING ON THE COARSE BACKFILL HEADER BOULDERS SHALL SPAN THE SEAMS OF
z POOL ,Ai\i � .' \\ \ -_�` POOL RD2 (US) #3 30 3G THE FOOTER BOULDERS. THERE SHALL NOT BE A SEAM IN THE CENTER OF THE STREAM BED (AT THE THALWEG). C p
/ // / / / // // #5 50 THERE SHALL BE NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS.
.ff )/
a) \/\/\/ / /\/\ E. PLACE COARSE BACKFILL BEHIND HEADER BOULDERS ENSURING ThAT ANY VOIDS BETWEEN THE BOULDERS ARE
\ \ / / /\ FILLED. PROJECT NUMBER: 0391
4. BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS.
PROJECT MANAGER: MB
a MAX 2"-3" DESIGNED: SCF
o BRANCHES
DRAWN: SCF
/ PROFILE CHECKED: AFM
0)
ccSHEET NUMBER:
6E
di
SOCK SILL
z
w —YPICAL •IPPLE NTS D4
J_
L NTS
I