20120142_Jurisdictional Determination_20111216

sr-
(Woo\
20
11 OF NORTH CAROLINA �4N Sq�os ,,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '��ar�RecH
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A CONTI JR
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 14 2011
MEMORANDUM TO Mr David Wainwright North Carolina Division of Water Quality
FROM Jason Dilday North Carolina Department of Transportation —
Natural Environment Unit (NCDOT NEU)
SUBJECT R 3421 C Jurisdictional Determination information
Attached are the NCDWQ Stream Identification Forms USACE Stream Quality Assessment
Worksheets and final mapping for T I P R 3421 C This information was presented to the
USACE for a final jurisdictional determination for the project The mapping reflects decisions
made during afield meeting on the project on March 15 2011 The forms attached include all
streams that were determined to be intermittent during the site visit Stream SX (Figure 2 1) was
discovered during the site visit and deemed intermittent at the time of the visit No form has
been completed for this stream From the final design for this project Stream SX will not be
impacted
If you have any comments or questions please let me know I can be reached by e mail at
jldilday @ncdot gov or by phone at (919) 707 -6111

NC DWO Stream Identifientinn Fnrm Vercinn d 1 1
Date /� 1J
Prolect/Site /�_ -3L j / _ f
Latitude —
Evaluator 1Z1 I�e,4YAP %
�F
County A61"alyl)
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
Af, ��
Stream Determi ion_(�rcle one)
Ephemeral �erenmal
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30
Intermittent
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal
11' Continuity of channel bed and bank
—Absent
0
Weak
1
-- Moderate
2
Strogg
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
—.ripple sequence
0
0
1
2
2
3
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
�I 1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplam
0
1
12J
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
L2J
3
8 Headcuts
, 0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
1 05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
B �rfifirml rii4rhnc o .. ......
No 0
Yes= 3
�• ••••�•�• �..�. aieu ace uiscussions in fnanual
B Hydrology (Subtotal= % - )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2—�
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
O J
6
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
, 0 5�
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0 0 5
_
1 1 5 J
17 Sod based evidence of high water table'?
No =10 ,
Yes = 3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
` p
19 Rooted upland plants m streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 1 BL = 1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See
p 35 of manual
Notes N-f-�_P_I J I T_1 a z— �iYi� =. Sj�i ��fi� ✓�
i V c
i �i
—��� ,U ✓��
Sketch

USACE AID #_
DWQ#
s:::�-
Site # / (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name j��%�� 2 Evaluator s name lG ��i'�i V
3 Date of evaluation / ���/ f 4 Time of evaluation
5 Name of stream 6 River basin I/ �7, z41✓ - Ae L
7 Approximate drainage area -- - - - 8 Streamorder '
/
9 Length of reach evaluated / -7 E 10 County F� lam!^ ✓l//y�
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
3� �� '
Latitude (ex 34 872312) �� Longitude (ex -77 556611)
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evalua / lion note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
N,,TPL of L�,U i -J
14 Proposed channel work (if any) `
15 Recent weather conditions C2p
16 Site conditions at time of visit G o
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known = Section 10 =Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
'-Trout Waters - Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters =Water Supply Watershed - (I iV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pomt9 YES GNOf yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES L-NO1 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES EE
21 Estimated watershed land use 1 '0% Residential S% Commercial �% Industrial 3e-� % Agricultural
01/o Forested % Cleared / Logged ± % Other (
22 Bankfull width
/ I
Z' 3 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) Z - -
Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
Frequent meander =Very sinuous _Braided channel
24 Channel slope down center of stream Flat (0 to 2 %)
25 Channel sinuosity '- Straight _Occasional bends
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious ch-inges in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments _ ��-' l �✓ '� ��
i�c�1.� ✓c t» ST✓'- -�StL,1 —r`�,! cE� iT`�Jv�v�oh��
A-t, r r! v
Evaluator s Signature �/ Date /t Az1 /Z-11/ e�,
This channel evaluation form is mtende used only as a guide to assist landowners and environment-il profession -Ils in
gathering the data required by the Uni o tates Army Corps of Engineers to mike a preliminary assessment of stre-im
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

NC ,1W0 ,1qtrPam 1d1- .*.fvro4. -- L--- 170..x.,... A 11
Date �/ 3 O / v
Project/Site + -,-- , / /G�
Latitude —
Evaluator / ID" MA) /
i
County
Longitude
Total Points
0
1
Stream is at least intermittent
>_ 19 7
Stream Determt ircle one)
Ephemeral ntennittent Perennial
Other
if or perennial if >_ 30 /-0
,�
v
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= J J)
- Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent_
0
Weak
_ Moderate_
_.Strong --
3
1
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
,�
v
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
1 5
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
L
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0;1
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
5
�j(D
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
�
No
Yes= 3
R Hvrlrnlnnv Miihtntol =VV C„J� "�11YO1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
3
1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No =10
Yes = 3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
T17
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3,
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0/
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
r0
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
7
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
J
FACW =10 75 `0131 = 1 5
Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes 1' ,� !�s''�l s�i�G
�✓2<r1�. 2 /A/ -�
Sketch

FUSAGE AID #,
DWQ#
s�
Site # / (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment \ /
1 Applicant s name A/ Llb�j 2 Evaluator s name
3 Date of evaluation /l i3o /2-07 4 Time of evaluation �� 61�%
5 Name of stream sF 6 River bas in
7 Approximate drainage area 8 Stream order 1 ��
9 Length of reach evaluated -C� 10 County
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
!
Latitude (ex 34 872312) zs 6/: i 1J 4- Longitude (ex -77 556611) 7y, -7 %
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13L"o�cation of reach under evalua nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions (fl01
16 Site conditions at time of visit ��dl
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known — Section 10 —Tidal Waters — Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters — Outstanding Resource Waters N Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed — (I IV)
18 is there a pond or lake located upstream of the eval ation point9 YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES NON 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use l o % Residential 5 % Commercial 5 % Industrial S49 % Agricultural
-4U% Forested N% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( —
22 Bankfull width
24 Channel slope down center of stream =Flat (0 to 2 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight -Occasional bends
i
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) Z
Nntle (2 to 4 /) ^Moderate (4 to 100/) =Steep ( >i0 %)
Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments / N- JC���i �i Nom]' ( c' --a
i i
N CA,
Evaluator s Signature N''r Date / l/3 P/ -r� /d
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as n guide to assist landowners and environmental profession'ils in
gathering the data required by the United Stites Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary -issessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particul,ir mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
#
ECOREGIO OI�T
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
piedmont,'
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration =0 no alteration =max oints)—
— —
-- ---
— —
—
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
—
Z
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
I
no discharge = 0 springs, sees wetlands etc = max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0— 4
0— 4
0— 2
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
J�
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
a'
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max omts
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
2
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0— 5
0— 4
0— 3
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
Z
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Z
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
��-
(severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
Z
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
i
F
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
(no shading vegetation = 0 continuous Canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
(no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
45
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWO Stream Identification Fnrm VPrcvnn d 11
Date /�
Protect/Site +� - Zf G _<�11,
Latitude _
Evaluator �� y� aS7�-�-
County O
Longitude
0 1
1 2
2 3
Total Points
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool 0
0 1
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determi ation4 ircle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other ---
If >_19or erennialif >_30
Perennial
e Quad Name
Ir
— A— Geomor holo — (Subtotal =E -) -- A
Absent W
Weak M
Moderate S
Strong
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool 0
0 1
1
P,--7--
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0
0 1
1 3
3
5 Active /relict floodplam 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
6 Depositional bars or benches 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0
0 1
1 r
r2--) 3
3
8 Headcuts 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
9 Grade control j
j0 0
05 1
1 1
1 5
10 Natural valley 0
0 0
05 1
11 ti 1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel N
No ' 0 Y
Yes = 3
i as i es are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 2� i
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 05 0
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 1 1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 1-05
1 1
17 Soil based evidence of high water table? No =,0 Yes =i3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22 Fish 0 05 1
1 5
23 Crayfish 05 1
15
24 Amphibians 0-,,-,) 05 1 1 5
25 Algae 0 5 1 1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other -- 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes J-1-W, L�1 �NGi�,� ✓,a —�a� v<
Sketch
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22 Fish 0 05 1
1 5
23 Crayfish 05 1
15
24 Amphibians 0-,,-,) 05 1 1 5
25 Algae 0 5 1 1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other -- 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes J-1-W, L�1 �NGi�,� ✓,a —�a� v<
Sketch

USACE AID#
DWQ # Site #
(indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name NUJV; 2 Evaluator s name
3 Date of evaluation /Z / i C�7 4 Time of evaluation /�� 022
5 Name of stream 6 River basin Y�1- J "- P_ --
7 Approximate drainage area
9 Length of reach evaluated
8 Stream order �_ `�
10 County
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex 34 872312) 01 f7 f �5 Longitude (ex -77 556611) 7
Method location determined (circle) l GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evalua ion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions I
16 Site conditions at time of visit
II V., f
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known — Section 10 =Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
=Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters = Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed` (i IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pointy YES [NaOlf yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surveys YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use O% Residential S A Commercial S /o Industrial Agricultural
-{D% Forested (a % Cleared / Logged % Other
22 Bankfull width 4 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) "1 �, /
24 Channel slope down center of stream =Flat (0 to 2°/) ZGentle (2 to 4°/) Moderate (4 to 10 %) =Steep ( >100/)
25 Channel sinuosity `Straight - Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous — Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation if a
characteristic c-innot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments /A/'�� -''�`l /&/ G 1 Gt,� Gr(75 1/1, � \­ � 1�
Cix -D=am =v 34 ti'L�i�a R -., t-,E .✓✓9V
Evaluator s Signature / ,- `— _� i `- Dnte l /7l/,%,- z- /�
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the d ita required by the United Stites Army Corps of Engineers to m -ike a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approvil and does not imply a
p -irticular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGIO
GE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont ---,Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
— extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)---
0 - 6
0-5
0 - 5
—
- - -
- - -—
- --
- - - --
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0 - 4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
extensive di 1—k—­ = 0 no dischar es =max omts
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
2
no floodplain = 0 extensive floodplain = max oints
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
5%
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
(no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1Z_
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max oints
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
(fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
�.
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max oints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max oints
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Z_
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max points
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
�
(no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max oints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
J
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWn Stream Identtfiratinn Fnrm Vnreinn d 11
Date ��
Project/Site —� �� SL!
Latitude —
Evaluator ���`/ �7�/
!
County �GI U
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Detertm anon - (circle one)
Other
If ? 19 or perennial If >_ 30
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e g Quad Name
I— i
- A- Geomor holo - (Subtotal = -1 �� )
,a Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent --
0
Weak
1
— Moderate
2
- Strong
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool n
le pool sequence
0
` 1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
3
9 Grade control
(0
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
05
11 Second or greater order channel
a
No =i 0 2
Yes - 3
anuw1m wLU1Ub die nuI idleU See UISGUSSIO In manual
B Hvdroloav (Subtotal = Z _
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
'T0 5/
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
_05
11 1
15
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 t
Yes = 3
t- DIOIOUV IJUDiotal = -4— 1
18 Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
( 1 1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
T37
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
40 )
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0�
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other. =` 0 ,
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p
35 of manual
Notes /N �✓! � Y ���- lN�� 21,
�f- o /�o
r�U l b ✓�� i
«�
!/� �r iZ ✓n� - �a /s< <i
Sketch

USACE AID #.
DWQ#
Site # / (Indicate on attached map)
M1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment /
1 Applicant s name /VcU.1�%�, 2 Evaluator s name
3 Date of evaluation /1 /2 '�/ /tom 4 Time of evaluation
5 Name of stream C {� 6 River basin
7 Approximate drainage area
9 Length of reach evaluated _
D'
8 Stream order
10 County
1 I Site coordinates (If known) / preefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex 34 872312) Longitude (ex —77 55661 1) -7C°45 -
Method location determined (circle) �GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evaluat note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
�'- S IUD = t1 � �c� w PINS
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
' Ii y ✓sic
IS Recent weather conditions t�i�l i f �
i
16 Site conditions at time of visit �+6TI_ �fu "" l-b
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known — Section 10 —Tidal Waters ^ Essential Fisheries Habitat
.Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient S nse� hive Waters Water Supply Watershed — (I iV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point9 YES,1 NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES ONE 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES 50
21 Estimated watershed land use 11 % Residential S % Commercial % Industrial 30 % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( // )
�� Rani fall .."Ith 'D ! 71 Rank heiaht ffrnm heri to tnn of hank)
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) �_, Moderate (4 to 10 %) "_Steep (> 10°/ )
25 Channel sinuosity ✓traight Occasional bends — Frequent meander —Very sinuous — Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified In the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided Into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments /Ayy
Evaluator s Signature_
E
This channel evaluation forlp>(is intended to be used only as n guide to assist hindowners and environmental profession-ils in
gathering the data required by the United Statc Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE ipproval and does not imply 't
particul-ir mitig ition ratio or requirement Form subject to change – version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGIO
T, RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmo
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
-
?
Evidence of past human alteration
0 - 6
0-5
0 - 5
7
— extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max oints -
_
_
_
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
-�
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max
points)
v
5
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge = 0 springs, sees wetlands etc = max points)
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplam
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
(/
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 4
0-2
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
-
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 4
0-3
extensive channehzat on = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0- 5
0- 4
0- 4
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
NA
0-4
0 - 5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
y+
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
-
0-5
,H.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 5
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
I S
Impact by agriculture livestock or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max omts
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 5
i
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
-
0-5
21
Presence of amphibians
0- 4
0-4
0-4
O
O
(no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
/
00
(no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max points)
(/
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
�7
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date -7>�
Project/Site �_3�' , G ��
Latitude _
Evaluator ,, / S �/
County �lC�il' iUN
Longitude -
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Detgrtnmationcle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
Other
Quad Name
if _ 19 or perennial if ? 30
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
n le pool sequence
e g
— -_ A Geomorphology (Subtotal = d 6-- ) Absent Weak Moderate I Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3 V
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
T-2
3
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
n le pool sequence
0
1
��
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 i
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplam
0
`1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1 2 L
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
IJ
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
I D 5,
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No =10 ;
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydroloqy (Subtotal = - )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
O J
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
-5-J
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
\
1 5
17 Sod based evidence of high water tablet
No =10
-11
Yes = 3
G Blology (Subtotal = 2�- )
18 Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
07
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
-tb J)
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
r0
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
_
FACW = 0 75 OBL =
1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
—
Notes
t-LI
Tv/, -K
Sketch

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # / (indicate on attached map)
F1 T-3 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name i�p,Lb 2 Evaluator s name ►'`���
3 Date of evaluation / 70—, / 4 Time of evaluation 4 5
__5 Name of stream _ y 6 River basin
7 Approximate drainage area _ 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated -S� 10 County
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex 34 872312) Longitude (ex -77 556611) -7 70 7 9-
Method location determined (circle) PGPS Topo Sh eet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GiS Other GIS Othe13 Location of reach under evaluate nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if any) _
15 Recent weather conditions
16 Site conditions at time of visit
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters — Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters = Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _ (I IV)
----7
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES �NO Il�yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 7NO
21 Estimated watershed land use l °/ Residential % Commercial S A industrial Agricultural
-41::% Forested LD % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22 Bankfull width S —mot 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
Z —`f
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight Occasional bends = Frequent meander Very sinuous = Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments
Evaluator s Signature i Date �2
This channel evaluation form is intended etates a used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionlls in
gathering the dat-i required by the Unite Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from t completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGIO
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
- Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
a
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
_
—2
Evidence of past hufnan alteration _
—0-6
-
— 0 - 5 - -
- —0 - 5 --
-
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max omts
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
Z_
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max poi is
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0 springs, sees wetlands etc = max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 4
0- 4
0- 2
Z
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
Z_
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2—
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
/
fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Z
yi
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
F.,
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture livestock or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
/
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pooUripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
F
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max omts)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
Z
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
7
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 5
0-5
,ate
(/
20
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
-
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
(]
O
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max po mts
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
:1
(no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max oints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWn Strennl irtPntifienttnn Tinvm Vnr.- A 11
Date / 36�Z6�
Profect/Site e-- �!�/
Latitude
Evaluator i b/'��/
County t�
Longitude
Total Points
1
1
1
` 2
2
2
Stream is at least lif r
>_
Stream Determination circle one
Ephemeral Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other _
if 19 or perennial if >_ 30
30
3
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= I 1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
3
3
3
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
0
0
0
1
1
1
` 2
2
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
--:—
2 \
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
22
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
12-
3
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
5
i1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
A f Ke ...- - -- -- -- - -
No =10
Yes = 3
- - -- — "— — - -..__ ..............�... .aa.r I. II I II .. lual
B Hvdroloav (Subtotal = '2, 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
TO
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
5
1
0 5 ,
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5J
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
17 Soil based evidence of high water table's
r o.,.i, .., ��..�._._ _ c
0 05
No =�0
1 1 5
Yes = 3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
-LO
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
LOJ
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0-,
0 5,
1
1 5
25 Algae
0_I
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL =
1 5 Other =10 i
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See
p 35 of manual
`"
Notes vf✓�
Sketch

USACE AID#
DWQ #,
Site # ' (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name ��M�� 2 Evaluators name�Ii�U�L�
3 Date of evaluation �� �� 4 Time of evaluation )
—__5 Name-of stream 6 River basin ,M/'7� /G ✓�� " !� ��
7 Approximate drainage area 8 Stream order / S%
i
9 Length of reach evaluated SD 10 County �N U1yiM
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex 34 872312) _� 2, Longitude (ex -77 556611) i-7 7 d
Method location determined (circle) iGPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evalua note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if army) -'
15 Recent weather conditions MoO
16 Site conditions at time of visit Mo L-
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
=Trout Waters = Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (i iV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point9 YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES I NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use `� %Residentia s %Commercial Z°/ Industrial _;�O_/ Agricultural
i
rO/ Forested O/ Cleared /Logged %Other ( )
22 Bankfull width Z l 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) _ Z
24 Channel slope down center f stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) 'Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) =Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight — Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous — Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregton based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregton Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregton Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) M Comments V ���� C / i /Lir`T r Z /, 7
Evaluator s Signature �Z / \ --, Date ZZZ3����
This channel evaluatio/ilform is intended to I�eused only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the d ita required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to mike a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE 1pproval and does not imply t
particular mitig ition ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
I t hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
?
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 5
--
— extensive alteration= 0 no alteration = max oin -
-
0-5
_
_
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0 - 4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max poi ts
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
Z
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
1
no discharge = 0 springs, sees wetlands etc = max points)
0-3
0-4
0- 4
1
U
�
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0 2
2
5,
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
-
�i
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
0-6
0-4
0-2
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
I
extensive channel ► zation = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
*
(fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
NA
0-4
0 - 5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
2
y+
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
d
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max poi ts
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture livestock or timber production
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
v
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
f
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA *
0-4
0 - 4
deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
O
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max po mts
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
I t hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date I' �a Zr�l
Project/Site —� �ZI L S�
Latitude _
Evaluator (��_ „�_/
County «
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination rcle one)
Other
if? 19 or perennial if >_ 30 lid
Ephemeral ntermitte t Perennial
e g Quad Name _
A Geomorphology (Subtotal
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
1 2
Strong
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
'—
2
3
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
t--� {—
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
\ 1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
t2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2-7j
3
9 Grade control
10^)
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
a
No
_,
Yes - 3
anwuai undies are nor rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal =
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
0 5\
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
1 5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
0 5/
1
1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No =10
Yes = 3
u tsioiogv (Subtotal = -i-
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
1 3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
'LOT
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
tTD
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
l 0--5—)
1
1 5
25 Algae
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # K (indicate on attached map)
F STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name 2 Evaluator s name �l✓Igt�
3 Date of evaluation
4 Time of evaluation
5 Name of stream I _ _ _^ 6 River basin l�%
7 Approximate drainage area — 8 Stream order _l
9 Length of reach evaluated SD 10 County
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex 34 872312) -s 6 141 P-, Longitude (ex -77 556611) -7-7 %�,7/0
i
Method location determined (circle) G:PS J Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
:! _ K v4�?1/\/G T ,,= V�
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions 4 °c' C-
16 Site conditions at time of visit L -
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters =Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters— _Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sen&tive Waters =Water Supply Watershed —D I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES i NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use % Residential -!;- % Commercial _% Industrial ?D % Agricultural
�p % Forested // d% Cleared / Logged =0/ Other(
22 Bankfull width Z,4 1 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) Z /
24 Channel slope down center of stream — Flat (0 to 2/0) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) =Steep ( >100/)
25 Channel sinuosity - -Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander —Very sinuous =Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments �O�y Z Z-,L­,
Evaluator s Signature / l / t % Date A/ Z P to
This channel evaluation form is intended to'6e used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stre im
qu-ility The total score resulting from`the-/completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGI4AFP�IfT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal -'
Piedmon i"
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 4
0-5
O
(no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
-
-
-2 --
Evidence of past human alteration
xetnes --
i a altratin = 0 no altreation - max onts
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
—�i
-
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0 - 4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max otnts
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
�]
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
I
U
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
m
no flood la = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
'
7
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
a
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0- 6
0 - 4
0 - 2
i1
li
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 4
0-3
I
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
y,
(fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
�r
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
��-
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max pot nts
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock or timber production
0-5
0 4
/
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
-
0-5
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
112
O
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
(�
(no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0 - 5
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date ( 2l�j�D
Project/Site �' Z% �`�
Latitude --
Evaluator ✓�� �11� „n�L
l�✓`4'
Coun �
ty
Longitude
Total Points
Stream Is at least intermittent 2 <p
Stream Deterrnina ircle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if ? 30
0
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = `�J )_ _
Absent
_ Weak _
_Moderate_
—Strong —
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
T�
2
3
4 Panicle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
` 1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
05
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
70 5
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1 )
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = -Z-
12 Presence of Baseflow
r 0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1 5
17 Sod based evidence of high water table?
No =\0
Yes= 3
C Bloloqy (Subtotal= -'�t f )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 \
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
/
1
2
3
22 Fish
10)
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
Lo-E
1
1 5
25 Algae
0,,-,
05
1 1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other =10 ,i
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name /%7vG� �- 2 Evaluator s name
3 Date of evaluation // /3�b le2 4 Time of evaluation
5 Name of stream --6 River basin
7 Approximate drainage area 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 10 County
11 Site coordinates (if known)
� prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any) �—
Latitude (ex 34 872312) �i G` S; / Longitude (ex -77 556611) 7 a 7
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evalualici (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions
��Jt
16 Site conditions at time of visit
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known
_Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
!"Grout Waters _ Outstanding Resource Waters
Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I iV)
18 is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation
pointy YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES
21 Estimated watershed land use l %Residential
�I/ Commercial S% industrial nO/ Agricultural
� 00/o Forested
1 G% Cleared / Logged % Other ( —
22 Bankfull width Z `3
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) / `7
24 Channel slope down center of stream — Flat (0 to 2 /)
'/ntle (2 to 4 %) 'Moderate (4 to 10°/) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity --Straight Occasional bends
'—Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments &�V, �—r
Evaluator s Signature
Date / /��✓' �Lolo
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United St -ites Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary -issessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
1
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
-2
Evidence of past human alteration
---
0�6—
0 - 5_
0 -5
/
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max omts)
-_
/
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
/
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
1
✓
no discharge = 0 springs, sees wetlands etc = max points)
�Vr
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
J%
'
7
Entrenchment / floodplam access
0-5
0-4
0-2
dee ly entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 - 4
0-2
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max
points)
/
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
(fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
yi
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
Z
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max oints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
Ei
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock or timber production
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
Z
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
Z
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max oints)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
Z
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 5
20
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max oints
-
0-5
V►
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
b
O
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
a
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
�
(no evidence = 0 common numerous es =max points)
�23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
�-
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
S�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vercinn 4 11
Date
Profect(Site — 2 1 /
Latitude
Evaluator -'_''t;L7��pj
County
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
19
Stream Determinatio circle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent� Perennial
Other
e quad Name
if? or perennial if? 30
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
g
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = I ` 1 )
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2 7
Strong
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
1
2 ,
_-
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplam
0
1
12 /
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
`1
—2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
22 Fish
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
! 2 J
3
9 Grade control
LO--)
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
F 05
1=
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
a
No :--O )
Yes = 3
d[uuudl wiuies are not rated see aiscussions in manual —'
B Hvdrologv (Subtotal = y 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 )
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1%
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
1 5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
—05
1
1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No =,0
Yes = 3
u CSioiogy (-Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
T 22
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1 0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
ro-
0 5
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0 _)
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
T O i
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes /�v� , 4�1 ctiT 1-12 v
Sketch

USACE AID#
DWQ #.
Site # / indicate on attached map)
p)�
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
I Applicant s name N� 2 Evaluator s name
3 Date of evaluation ��Z� ! U 4 Time of evaluation I ° C�
i P
5 Name of stream �_ _ __ T 6 River basin ��4-� � - �
7 Approximate drainage area
Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated I C�, / 10 County e__) C_ - i.- , ,,',�,
11 Site coordinates (if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex 34 872312) 3� D I �O� Longitude (ex -77 556611)
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions
16 Site conditions at time of visit
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known —Section 10 --Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
'—Trout Waters --Outstanding Resource Waters =Nutrient Sen ifive Waters --Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pomt9 YES � I es estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YIN NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surveys YES N
21 Estimated watershed land use % Residential LA Commercial �% Industrial 3 d % Agricultural
22 Bankfull width Z-- 3
4't:5' % Forested 1 D A Cleared / Logged % Other
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1—,' 1
24 Channel slope down center�of stream —Flat (0 to 2 %)— Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight 'Occasional bends --Frequent meander =Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach tinder evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest) the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) Comments
Evaluators Signature // `" \(
This channel evaluation form is intended
gathering the d -ita required by the Un
quality The total score resulting from
particular mitigation ratio or requiremen
Date `7 1Z 2-/ t t,
t
used only as a guide to assist hindowners and environmental professionals in
tes Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION PONY
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
/Piedmont
Dd6ntain
1
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0 strop flow = max points)
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
—_
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 — 6
0 — 5
0
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max omts
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0 — 4
0-5
no buffer = 0 contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 — 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0 springs, sees wetlands etc = max oints
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0— 4
0— 4
0— 2
COO y,
no flood lain = 0 extensive flood lain = max points)
�i
2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 — 4
0-2
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 — 4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max oints)
.�
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
>
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max oints
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
Z
(no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture livestock or timber production
0-5
0 4
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
—
0-5
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA *
0-4
0 — 4
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max
- 5
points)`—�
0-5
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
[/
C
(no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0— 4
0— 4
0— 4
(no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max oints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 — 5
0-5
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

CD
fD
O
-0 ` C - Q
CD
: CD j
�. 0 t
2) N (n
(D -
-% ,..f Q
C/)
CD
D
�I •
A i
�C-ecel a Large A- �
a �
S
220
_ .
c
f
i • o-
- * ;
1.

NELFWM
mi
C w
U.S. 22
J 4_­"{L
CD
to
O
CD
0
CD
z
CL
CD
(D
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
:3
cn
cn
rl.
cn
CD
CL
A.
11%
CD
co
Ei
>
-%
2)
E3
2) CD
NELFWM
mi
C w
U.S. 22
J 4_­"{L

r -
�V-
rte�r`.
BSI
r
•C.. A
age
ay
Say`
ozz .s.n
r
C
m
III
W
A�
0
Q
O
0

<1 Z
C
HONV -88 SIS k-IVNV -lViN3WNONIAN3
CN
N
_
„ a dNV 1N3WdOl3A34 103f ONd 06ZK-2] 133rMJd d11
F—
14-
LO
N
L'
M
z SAVMHJIH =10 NOISIAIa )UNnoo QNOWHOI2J
M
M N
a y NOI1t NOdSN"i JO
.—
yo 1N3WiNVd3a VNIIONVO HINON S32If11173j 1b�NOIlOI4SRlflf
aj
(,L
bb'J k.:iOK
m
a--

Z
0
aO Nd5�i01� HON` S SISAI-IVNV ltl1N3WNONIAN3
N
?
N
4 f o
a ONV lN3WdOl3A31o3Nd `O I ZK -2] 103PO2Jd dll
H
I
LO
z SAVMHJIH :JO NOISIAId �dNnoo aNOWHOIb
N
h NOIlVl8OdSN"I :JO
co
•-
y' LN3WINVd3O `dNI-IONVO HiNON S3bfllV3:1- IVNOIlOIdSiNn Uj
'0bd'J
N1HbOT` �
%
>m
0

1
-lot
oat
1 � 5
VA
�- I
,z
r
tQ E
Q
a�
a. a. O
a�
or
oee -s .n
r �,r
. y
E
2 At
4

<1 Z
,raiiolt,��1 HON"S SISk-IVNVIV1N3WNONIAN3
N
�_ C?
r
�
�
MoD
(INV 1N3WdOl3A3a f 133 oNd 0l Ztl£-2] 103 r jd dll
F- �
U-)
C-
M I`
z h SAVMHOIH =10 NOISIAIQ kLNnoo aNOI/VH0121
M
� N
NOIIVINOdSN"l 10
co
1N3WINVd34 VNIIONVO HINON S3NnIV3d IVNOuoi(iswn U)
aj
LL
bbo +ia� 30
>
m
u cu

z
U
HONV2d9 SISAIVNV -IVIN3WN0?IIAN3
N
�_ m
�
N
r
Ga
b�5�vtlii0i���
GNV 1N3WdOl3A3a 103rONd O �ZK-2J 103M' ld dll
I—
LO
00
SAVMHJIH d0 NOISIAId ,LNnoo GNOINHOI?J
N
NOI1VI2JWSN"i dO
ao
M
•�
1N3WINVd3a VNI -10NVO HINON S3NniV3d 1VNOIlOIQsiNn
C
aj
LL
o �
Q
�
0

2010 -2011 NCDOT
Stewardship Inspections
A B
C D E F G H
J
K
L
M
N
O
2
3
d
EEP Transla, Sltea
R- 2228WM C,m I, 1 C.- OX10X5
dropdown menu
St-IdIhIP P-11.1
5
1
BMMII[e F,rtn
NM1 W] -031
7/148011
In -Howe
WMlfe R..,. GnanMabn
6
2
Caday Tradt
R- 2228M
Cun k
1
Pesqutank
0]010205
WM W7-0W
71148011
Irt-H.w
Wldlhe R-noe G,nMaabn
7
3
genet Su
R- 220SNA
Gab.
1
Peso -1,
03010205
NM OT/-001
In -How
Whd. Read- Cammlselu
B
4
Hw4erow SVe
R- 2111WM
Martin
1
T.nPamtko
OXXt03
WM (nb-0Ot
7nS8011
IMHOw
MMIMe Rawum G,mlesbn
9
5
MNnt Habor
R -2301
Dare
1
Fraeo nk
03010303
Vlaf 728-002
71132011
In -How
10
6
MNM1OeL Read
R-5 -
Caro
1
Pasqure.k
03010205
VMA 023-001
71132011
Ir Houk
U.S. Fleh end wMlNe Servke
G
11
7
Pea I...
R -0113
Dan
1
ft.han ahk
03010205
WM 023-005
IrvH.-
U.S. Feh and Vdk6Ne Swlca
G
12
8
Trrdrsr Fam
R- 2223WM
Dare
1
Pea ,,tank
03010205
V1M W74103
1142 -1
Ir HOw
-1. Raourte GmmbalOn
13
9
Coe o
&2024
0.n
1
Pasquolank
03010205
WA 028-015
In -How
On a.
14
10
Lake landlrM G
80858
Dan
1
Tar - Pamlico
03010205
WM 048 -0OS
71132011
In H-
On -ena
15
11
ft- Cruk l
R- 2512WM
Dan
1
PA. -dank
0301MOS
m 021-002
7114/2011
In -How
On -tine
t fi
12
Pemboke Creak II
R- 2512WM
Dam
1
PAd -de."
0X10205
V1M 021.002
71148011
Ir,HOw
Or-aib
17
13
a.., Nock p BMge
BJ4'15
Dan
1
Choawh
0301020.1
W0021.006
&308011
lh,How
On�eb
TemO.ROSt, Enrunc
18
14
Scrennn Cmk Brbye
83193
Dan
1
Tar -Pemdo
1--
tr1e1018 OW
71132011
IMHOwe
On-aXa
19
15
S P;P nlorlg
R -25430
pan
1
Pe -..k
03010205
Vse1 034.031
71132011
Ir,HOuN
On-sae
20
16
Mate'. a..
R -2551 WM
Dan
1
Pas .-k
03010205
wM 02 &003
7/132011
IMHow
On -site
21
17
ABC
R- 2510WAA
Beaufort
2
TarPamke
03010104
- 007-002
I,How
WItlINe Raeourw Qm--n
22
18
Bear Cmk
FOP
Lenoir
2
Nauss.
03020202
WM 052 4)10
IMHOw
23
19
w $oYM Sand SM1O.IS
V -222!
Carteret
2
WTae GN
03020108
VM 01&007
Ifl -How
24
20
SOYN aka Pro
R- 2105W1A
Carter.,
2
MI. Oak
-GIN
WM 018-004
IMHOw
25
21
M1,l F.-
R- 21051MA
Jones
2
W1ae Gk
=.I%
VxM 052403
712 &2011
In-H.-
MItlMe qa..- Ce-Idn
26
22
Croaten MX awn Ben4 Prwea I
R- 1015WM
Cr.ven
2
Naw
03020204
WM 025-003
In H-
US F.resr Service
Full Ghvery Bank
27
23
CrNbn Me, Mon Bank PMse II
R- 1015WM
Cnven
2
New.
03020204
WM 025-003
IMH-
U.S. F.- S.-
Full NI-r, Bank
28
J 24
Gromaentl Ph.. ll
R- 2510WM
Pltt
2
Tar- Pamllco
03020103
WM 074-001
6'11-11
IMHOw
WHIN. R....- COmmlaebn
N
25
Gar .. She PMea
R- 3510034.1
PIR
2
T-NnnBco
03020103
Yse4 01e-001
6'152011
IMHow
WMIf. R.- C,mniaebn
30
26
Gum
R- 102303.1
C-M
2
Nauss
03020203
WA 040001
In HOUN
WMfde Revoum Gn ston
31
27
9 LMM
FOP
Lenoir
2
Nome
=M02
4 14 :2011
IrvHOUN
Full Oe-,
32
28
Combed Cree1 -Phuo1
R- 2510M
Beaufort
2
OW20104
V1M 07 WI
412!8011
n -Houk
On I.
33
29
f r Pninl
R 21 WA.
CeMrat
2
White GX
030301 W
WM 016 001
712 &2011
n -Houk
34
30
Ga Pro
Beaufort
2
T., Pamlco
03020104
V1e1 W7 W3
&168011
1r,HOuN
35
31
C1NCem Road
R- 27190A
Lenoir
2
03020202
V1M 054 -0113
412 812011
MHouN
On-am
36
32
.Dear Croak
RR105WM
C.-t
2
W1nd Oak
03020106
VuT40181102
712 &2011
'H...
On -sna
37
33
Lan N
B- 253103.1
Cnven
2
Neuso
031120204
WM 025 MI
712 &2011
In-How
Omsne
38
34
,SealMll
82531VMh
Cnven
2
0380204
YsA1025-002
712&2011
h -
391
So- Creek, Grady. Gap Run
R -2001.
Law!
2
Nause
031310202
WM 036.1
4 Id :2011
IMMOw
On -sna
40
36
SSA 1181 -1, Sr.
N.
I Carbnt
2
Nause
03020106
YM4 016-006
&241X11
In-HOw
On site
41
37
Thonu Mero Be 0nd a
81098
Carteret
2
Neuso
03020106
WM 016-005
&248011
In -How
On alit
42
36
bleat Fork Goose Cmh Su.m Stte
R 2539
Pamlico
2
Nause
-2.-
Y\M 055 x_
426201'
In•How
.-d.
43
39
"Farm
UOSOS
Sam
3
Cape Fear
03030006
VMA 032-003
&,woii
111-How
WMXt. Redound. Comrssebn
d4
40
I urge USMC
V -2107M
ON1ow
3
Vahlb Cal,
03030001
WA.103]-002
I71-HOw
USMC
45
41
GNan T,a.
New Hanover
3
Ceps Far
0303000]
VeM 035-012
&2 52011
IMHow
Full Gen
46
42
Oele TnR
FOP
BnnaMCk
3
Cape FNr
03030035
WA.1010-006
&2 &2 .1t
InHOw
Fu0 GWery
4]
0.3
Bmsatk
FOP
Brunswick
3
GN Fur
0303OWS
WM 010-009
&258011
InHow
Fa G'
48
44
WWS Run
R- 210SAIM
OmI-
3
GN FNr
0]0]0007
03.1.1404
&1.X1,
IMHOUN
N. C. Sore PeMe
49
45
Mofty. Pro
FOP
Brunswick
3
G Fear
03030005
WM 010-010
712712011
IMHgw
FW GIW.ry
50
a
Rase, adend1
FOP
B-0ok
3
C Fear
ap
030]0006
0364010011
&258011
I,HOUN
FW Gllvery
51
47
GNMn SU
R 221113
Du e,
3
Far
OXX037
VkM 031-002
&98011
In-Haw
]8ac
52
3o Sout
U-0092A
New H
3
GN Fear
03674741
WM 085406
5;112011
IMiouN
On -arts
53
49
Be Swenn,, Bridge
-271
Sam
3
W FNr
03090008
WM 002.006
&1]8011
In -HOusa
Gsnp
54
50
Bentley Croak Bndp
0.3486
Naw He-.,
3
Coe Fear
0]710005
V1M 085013
5/112011
In -NOUN
0 -sae
55
51
81rdBe Malnreronce SN
0.082
New He--,
3
Caa Faer
03474761
WM 065002
5'11 - 11
In-HOw
G -see
56
52
Cwmy SN
0-0082
New He-,
3
Gpa Fur
03474741
WM 085-005
"118.11
r,HO-
O-d.
57
53
Meese SMet
U -0082
New Hanover
3
Cape FNr
03474741
WM O 11
51112011
In -Mow
On -one
56
54
Nodm et Leek erode
B -3882
One-
3
Whde GM
0302010!
WM 067008
&1.2.11
In -HOUN
On -ena
SB
55
Parrot Saerlw Shop
8.3358
0-1-
3
White GY
03030001
V141067-001
&1012 011
1,HOw
ile. wl 2.54 acre ad-
60
56
Smo C-1, a.
U-0W2A
New Hanover
3
Gpa FNr
03030007
WM 055004
&112011
In4i0uN
on-
61
57
Bnroh
L-0 -
New Hanover
3
G Faer
030]0007
vM403 i
71712011
In -How
On -sire
62
58
Sam BrM
8-me
I Oral-
3
IoM. GM
03020103
WM W]-0W
7888011
In -HOUN
O-re
63
59
-ge
&3152
Sam
3
Card Fear
03030008
WA 2
03034
&17MIl
In -Now
On -anti
64
60
Vaarewwtar Tmtmem She
U-0082
New Herwvar
3
Gm Fear
0347.1
lMA 06..003
5111/2011
In -HOUN
On.aNe
65
61
Benson G.-
R- 2547WM
John-
4
N...
0302001
WN4051-003
4�2020i1
In -How
WltllNe Resource COmmeebn
66
62
MNnd Wbode
R- 211103.1
Edga combs
4
Tar - Pamlico
03020103
WM 031W1
6;162011
In -Ho-
WIdIN. R.eo.n. -A-
77- 67
63
Seven 3 nn a
R -2422
Wee N
4
Nause
03020102
L M4 oo1
168011
In -Houk
68
64
W1ne Gx Creek
q- 2W7WMA
John-
4
Nause
03020201
V1fA 031-001
X(X11
In -NOUN
69
6
ne .1111
R -t030MA
WIN.
/
Hew
0]710103
MN 065001
148011
In -Mow
W.I. Ra »use Gmnnebn
70
fib
Snrvth .1111 Run
R- -U
Wee ne
4
030X201
WM MJ8 004
148011
In -How
On -aye
71
67
Vubtlantl 5lta lV
R- 1030BB
Wee ne
4
03020231
vM4096 035
a: 14X11
In -How
On -afe
72
68
AMdt
R- 2541WM
Wake
5
1
WM 082401
412 &2011
In -NOUN
7116x1011
73
69
Damn 'e Creek
R.-
Wake
5
N-
OXXX1
Vlaf OBZ41W
&182.1 t
In -HOUN
Tn..b I.A. Cemerva
74
70
Harm Fam -HOP
R 2000
Franklin
5
Tar -Pa-
03020101
WA 035001
lrvHow
75
71
Lake WTNIar
R- 3000VS1A
Wake
5
N.w
03020201
WM 092-001
NIA
n-HOUN
C M RaM h
Co eta
76
72
Newt Cruk
R -203003.1
wake
5
New
0302.201
VsT11 W2-007
�I &1011
In-How
USA CE
Su Ma ten Plan
77
73
Gksvoad Gma
R- 200003.1
Wake
5
New
03030301
WN 0824103
>1t9RMt
I'm-
78
74
Milne
IR2-
Wake
5
New
03020301
Vsa1032 -005
IMHpUN
79
75
Rea B-1 NCSU Phe .1
R -2WoWM
Wake
5
Neu.
03020201
W e 0324IN
412.X11
in -NOUN
NCSU
SO
76
q Bit- NCSU Phase ll
R -2030WA
Wake
5
Nause
03030301
WM 082-029
412.2011
I,Haw
NCSU
9i
77
Spam. an-
R- 2541WM
Wake
5
1 Nava
03020M
W1a4032-009
41202011
In44ow
Tree Lars Gwm
71192D11
82
1 78
-.11
R- 20301A1A
Wake
5
Nana
03020301
WM 032 414
ln-H-
83
79
MiphMale Bywa She-
R- 2547 -CC
Wake
5
Neu»
03,20X1
WM 032 -017
X1,120,1
Ir1 -Hdw
On -sna
84
60
Long 8d,-
R 2X6
Wake
5
New
0302.2.1
WM 1-12
511 &2M 1
In -How
On -site
B5
81
Mark's Creek
R -2547
wake
S
03020X1
Vkk4 092 -0t t
1120111
In -How
On -doe
86
82
MMgo Creek
R -25x7
Wake
5
N..
03020201
119/2011
1,HOw
On-eae
87
83
UT 1. 8reck Cruk (Hemson Aw. . Orrva)
V -280X8
Wake
5
03020201
33019
&,&X11
1,Hpw
G -sna
98
84
LIT. MI- Creek (NC 93��tlntonm el
R -2905
wake
5
03020201
2�02.
311 &2011
In-HOw
On -one
99
85
lIT to NX Ch- (Gvb Ome Ev a Rem)
R -2030A.
VYk.
5
030102.1
-024
526X11
In -HOUN
On.-
90
86
UT to La. B,a p (T- Dme1HO Spit )
R -2541 WM
Wake
5
New
,30X201
] -013
&16'2011
In -How
On- ne
91
87
UT to RN Bunt Cruk
0-2527
We"
5
ier- PaMico
OJ482241
t-0ll1
512 &tot I
IMHow
On -sm
92
88
UT to Richland Creak
R -28WB
Wake
5
NNM
03450341
VW2�le
2.0X
&1&2011
IMHOw
On -ae
93
89
South Elie- Cmk
1 -X65D
D~
5
0
New
03020201
2 -001
V 812 .11
In -House
90
Gad Da
.- 220403.1
Natlen
6
GN FNr
03030005
-002
IMH-
WM11. R.-
95
91
1- rBe
R-0513WM
ROboNn
6
LumWr
03010203
.008
77132011
In -Houk
96
92
LMb MLOu.en
R -25M
Robeson
fi
Lumb.,
03040303
8-0 7
'71&2011
n -How
NO State Parke
97
93
Idacx C Duck., Road S110
U 3312
Cumberland
6
Goo Feat
03030004
6 W1
&1712011
In -Haw
4'Dt
98
94
o, Onogd
M1 ref.
831 52
Sam
6
03030006
W: Wd
6'162011
In-HOw
99
95
LLM4WM
Guilford
7
GN Fear
00030303
V1M 011406 I
IMHOw
Starr -I -nhy Club
tOC
96
Satoh BWtab CnW
I.2402WM
Guillow
7
1
G Fear
03030003
WM 0.14708
&2 &2011
In -How
C' Gmnebon
1011
97 a V11re Park
U- 2524WM
GUllbld
7
Ceps Fear
03010002
WM 041-003
512 &2011
In -How
CN, . Green...
1021 98
ft-- F-t GC
U- 252eWM
Guilford
7
Gpa Fur
03030002
171M 04141D
&1&2011
I1HOw
Stern,- Country Club
'031
99
SLamvun Pak
U- 252.03.1
Guilford
7
G pe Fear
030X001
VsM N1 411
&1&2011
In -How
dy of G.e. rd
1041
100
8usaman'a Park
U -M I M
Guilford
7
Cape Fear
030]0032
V\IA 031 4)12
&1 &2011
In -How
CIO, a GmmbMo
105
101
-Blvd / -IW,
R41038
Gu,ft d
7
Ca Fee,
03030002
V1a1041 -037
8118)2011
In -How
O,- W
106
102
Hera Cmk
R-06D8
GWlford
7
Cau F.,
03030002
VvM 041 -006
&1 &2011
In -How
On -one
107
1D3
1,2402A,B.0
1.2402A.B.0
Gu1NOrd
]
Fear
00330302
-.1-3
Ili X,1
fir HOw
16 r
Toe
104
M.haere B,aneh
U3110A
Al.manN
7
0
GPe Fear
61030303
V1.A 031031
&'1&X11
In-x1oUN
Onedds[
109
105
UT No. 9 b Bull Run (SM.1)
U- 2S24AC
Guilford
7
O
C, Fear
03482063
VM4 041-024
&2/2011
In -How
G -one
110
106
UT to HkNO LroeN (911.1.] 8 nT
U- 252.AB
Guilford
7
0
Gpe Fur
03482041
VvT1041025
&28011
In -Now
On -sin
111
107
UT to Hkko CraeN (&I. 036)
U -2S-e
G,kNOrd
7
p
Cane Fur
03/820/1
V1M 041 -026
&LXt,
In -How
G -tine
112
108
Gvin.ss
U- 2524M
Randolph
B
Gpe F.ar
0303003]
1.14076-005
7 2011
In -Mow
113
109
Gaon
R- 241703.1
Rantlol
8
Lap. Fee.
0303000.1
WA 078-018
4272011
1n,How
114
110
E M1amnl POOI
R-2558WM
Scotland
8
Lumber
0304020]
VM4031W1
248011
INHOwe
115
111
Glb»n Ford
12-5-
Richmond
B
Yadkin
03040201
W O 07]-003
9(2912011
In -How
116
112
Lan Swa
R-0512WM
Hoke
B
L-r
030X0203
WM 01]-003
5242011
In -How
MMIM. R.uuru Gmmsabn
117
113
Mud LNk LruX - TMrroa Se.
U -252.1.1
Chatham
B
GN Fur
03030033
4M1 018008
182011
In -NOUN
EEP Nwr bun &DOT u,cllee.d auaman
118
114
San Cnek
1- 240303.1
R.ndol h
8
Ceu Faer
03030003
V16.1078 -019
4;27,2011
In -How
.1dafe Reeouru Gmmssion
119
115
to Cmk -. Tna1
U- 2524WM
R.M10 h
6
Ceu Faer
010X003
WM 019-003
524;210 1
In -NOUN
Tm Ie Land Gneerva
120
116
SALT
R -21M
Moore
8
Gpa Far
03030004
V1sA 033-002
5:24X11
In -How
121
117
a, &Mge (W Id.1d)
R 4210A
Moore
8
Cape Faer
00330304
Wee .834X14
12. X11
IMHow
On -and
122
118
Mvnck Pond
R 2231B
Richmond
8
Yadkin -Pad D,e
03040201
WM 077.W2
IMHow
On. :nee
123
119
Sit. 6
R2417BB
LN
8
Ceps Fee,
03030004
W A 03}002
6168011
l -How
Ons11e
124
120
UT Bull R-SU 143 221
R- 2417BA
Lee
8
Cxu Fur
03030006
- 053-003
6.168011
In -How
On sno
125
121
UT Cram Creek
R 120C
LN
8
Cape Fear
03030034
WA M-1
821'2011
In -How
On -one
126
122
UT L111e Rrve,
R 210A
Moore
8
Cape Fee,
03030004
­3
524:X11
MHOUae
On -site
127
123
F-M Manh
R3247
Forsyth
9
Yadkin
0X10101
WA ®4001
981X11
In-How
WMINe Rea- Ca-don
128
124
UTto Town Cheek SNe..53
1 -2511 CA
Rowan
9
Yadkin
03040103
VMI 086004
&&2011
1,HouN
129
in
Anon RUn
U -XWA
Cebanub
10
Y.dem
,3010105
Vsk1011003
4262011
n-HOw
OMeae
130
127
Goose Creek Graem Sna
R -2123
Mackienbur
10
Y,dk,,
3003105
Vse41186 .13
1,25X11
In -How
131
128
Ka Branch
R -2531
An..n
10
Yadkin
0301.104
VM4004.032
&258011
Ir,HOuN
WI41fe Rae,um COmnXSaion
132
129
1.,. Su , Cmk
8 -0211 W
Meckinbur
10
Ca.-
030X103
VMA 000039
6262011
IMH...
133
130
Lo Creek
R -22411
M- 1denbur
10
Greats
0X50101
YMA 066002
Irt-HOw
MakbnbU Co.
134
131
Maon Cmk
R-0211WM
Mscld.nbur
10
Yadkin
03010103
VM.I OBO -Opa
In -How
UNGCh-ed
135
138
11, !o Dote G.dx
1 --A
Macktenbur
10
,.
1 "-
03050101
i0 - 005
2112011
I,,How
On "I.
136
137
G,W CM1Ur,M1
R- 21200314
Yadkin
11
Yedkln
03010101
WM 003.003
Ir,HOw
-fte
137
138
Vlrartb, 4 LMM Waster Crew
. -2239
W lk-
11
Yadkn
03040101
- 097.031
IMIIRw
W.I. Ft- Ce .h
138
139
Cmk Hen
FDP
Yadkin
11
Yadkin
030101.1
WM O9800e
In -How
Pbdmom tarts CA--
FWI Dabe
139
140
F.- Rover Ma. Bank Ri FD
FOP
Surry
11
Yadkin
03040101
WM 086-001
InHOw
Plednen Lad Gnaarva
Full NIA.
140
141
Ha in .tick - A3
R- 2237WM
A-ry
11
Wareupa
00310103
VM1008031
ImHOw
141
142
Lawn Cmk Ra afa
8-0528
W..
11
N.w
05050001
VsM 085-000
Ir,H-
M d1d. Resource Gmmbabn
142
143
Must Cam CneN XI.r us
R4 S
Wab
11
New
05050001
WA4 035.033
In -How
WM10, Reeou,ee Grrvwealon
143
144
Okoda CmN eN
R41529
Ash,
11
N.
05050001
wo 005.039
IMH-
MkHN. Raao - Gn -h.lan
144
145
3a".
R-2W
Alb hen
11
New
031
.1
In -Hw
Whill. Reed.- Gme
145
148
Ul a b
8.0529
W tau
11
New
05050301
Vsk1 OBS-0O2
I,HOw
-1. Read- Od-n
146
147
UI M PNk Cmk Ban sN
124.128
Ash.
11
New
65050031
W ,005002
In -House
WMM. Read- C,-,e-
147
148
N -22380
R -2239C
Yadkin
11
adk e. Oee
03040101
IMH-
SNS 1,23..I67y
148
149
eroatl Rlva Gneua
R- 270]03.1
Clevetand
12
Brood
030X103
V1M 023-001
In -How
Broad Rive, Gre.naa Council
G
149 150
She hen7e Tea
R -2239
1,.d.1l
12
Yadkin
030.0103
03.1.49-003
IMHOw
WI411fe Resource COmmieaion
150 151
1-1 Cloak
R-06t78A
Lincoln
12
Catavna
03050102
van 011003
ImHpuss
Un :no
151 152
I:T G.- Rive,
R -2206A
Gaston
12
Cata-
0-101
VrM OJG -OC1
121&2011
IMHow
On -sal.
152 153
UT MnIe, Branca
U- 2307A0
C..Wb2
12
Card-
OU79141
121612011
1,11-
On -sno
153 156
L1tla CrNN BamMll SNa
A ,CWM
Madison
13
Farah Broad
00310103
VN 057-002
&x2011
1,How
WMINe R-nde Gnmle.i0n
154 155
PsiM Fork Crook
AxHeWA
MMllaon
13
French Broad
OX1o105
V1.40574105
&11X1,
Ir,HOw
WMINe Reaourd G-Idn
155 156
Sou!FoM Pim Cnek Clad-V GMMS
moia,"M
Machos
13
F-emd
06010105
WM 057-023
WIX1t
Ira -How
WMIri Redoum G--n
156 157
Par. Fort, C-e (8-n San
A-0U10YMA
Ma haon
13
Fnrlch h"
03M.1W
WM 057-028
&W2011
IMHouN
WI.N. Re.o.m G-.eron
157 158
MINI. Fob Cnalr PhIIN Nflha
A-0MOWM
Modiadn
13
Fromh B„ad
06.10105
NA 057-001
&0201 t
In -HOUSE
MbIN. R.s,um Cod -,,1,n
158 159
Franklin Bo
R -221 WM4
HerWarsOn
14
F,.-h Brous
060101 W
W4A 09541.1
Irt-HOw
u G,nlneawn
159 160 Mud 'saeN
A-0OtOMA
Henderson
14
F. -&oed
08010105
W4A 015 -002
Ira -Mow
160 161 -ula
A4)DOMAM
Graham
14
LMI. T.nroeee.
08010206
Vsal O1B-0M
1x1 -NOUN
MI41. R...um Gmn.abn
161 162 Necc4nn Croak
R -2210A
Ha od
14
French Brood
M010106
WvM 0,14004
n -How
On -site
16 183 UT Ic Raccoon Cruk
R- -A
Ha od
14
French Brood
Ofi0101 W
WM 044 WS
.1 -HauN
On vne
163
16,1 Terel Cvcb %
165
166 X.37% In4NO 100.004
167
168 Co..uaanr 0.003.
169 srd Que,"Oeb ,ear tLaNmbr 61, XH Waite a
17
1'1
2