NCG551614_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

WNrER TECHLARS:�:: 1,11".
PindWood Plazg Drive -,P. Q.. Box 1056.
Granite Vj�()je,)-�Bm allIAG31JOW
. F011,s,,N..C.286.3Q- lad I
Phone [phone] -Ftv (828):396-5.76f S080M
9w t � Nnr
CLIENT: Tim. Barbee PHONE NUMBER:'
LVgWaN ON 3AQ*W1
s w " r
TYPE SAM.P Te at e
913 :,No; LOCATIONS; - I
SAMPLER NAME,
,Sample Collection Information TYPE CONTAINERS
Sample, Location Grab/ ANALYSIS, REQUIRED
M 0 ot- Plastic/
DATE TIME : TE composfte� No.
....Facility Name Glass,
Happy Vall-ey:.M'edic4l Grab 4 Plastid 1301), TSS, CQD,TKN,PH.
d - :'3
#/ 16 /. 1.
R hlqUishdd B�.:'
d Date. Time; Reqjeived. Y; Date: Time,:
S�
Relinquished BY'Date:ITime:: �
IRdcekvW,BYDate: Tune:
-
PRE ERVATION.-
601-40C-
[I H2SQ4-
tJ'Na0H
TI HNO3
Declifornating Agent
i !'Other.
SAMPLE TEMP .,;@-LAIJ: (°d)
Q.Wc�rirnerr-Residual ��mgjl
NC CERTIFIED L.A.B. 50,

ANALYSIS DATA ENTRY
Z60.6 130,m,:6arbes;
618/2O1 6
Eli,
ANALYTE
GBQD.
TS$
pH;.� ,;
Fecal Goliform.:-TKN
RESULTS'
16:2
7 5
7.2�—
i 4S
5 32
uNIrS .
tng1L
mg7i
SU".S'
1100mL,
_.
ANALYSIS':DATE
6/9/16
6/9116 _.
6/8/lb
6I8116`
__... _.
5/23/16 r;r—�—
ANALYST.
idg
_..
' jrq (aq

Y
a
Environmental
Quality
May 17, 2016
Mr. Daniel Bridges, Owner
2040 Monterosa Road
Concord, NC 28025
PAT MCCRORY
' Governor
r�
-r D �N�WL +` VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
2040 Monterosa Road, Concord
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG551614
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Bridges:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection for the inspection conducted
at the subject facility on April 8, 2016 by Mr. Ori Tuvia.
Please be advised that at the time of the inspection. (4/8/2016), Tim Barbee, the system operator
indicated that he will provide the necessary sampling within a week. As of 5/16/2016 no
sampling results have been received. The necessary sampling must be provided within 30 days.
The attached report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions,
please do not -hesitate to contact Mr. Tuvia at [phone], or via email at [e-mail].
Cc: NPDES (Unit)
MRO Files
Sincerely,
Ori Tuvia, Environmental Engineer
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, DEQ
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 .
Phone: [phone] \ Fax [phone] \ Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.oig . '

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 6-3;-98
Section A National Data`Sysfem Coding. (i.e:, PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type- Inspector . FacType
1 IN 1 2 15 1 3 I. NCG551614 I11 12 16/04/08 17 18 I C I" 19 I c I 20I
21111111 1111111111-1.11.1 IIII 1111111 11111111111 r6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved.
67
1.0 70 Ia "I 71 IN J 72 I N I 731 I 174 ' 75
LJ LI I I I
80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective. Date
POTW name and NPDES cermit Number)
01:45PM 16/04/08
14/05/06
2040 Monterosa Road l
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
2040 Monterosa Rd
Concord NC 28025
02:30PM 16/04/08
18/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)Mdes(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Daniel H Bridges///
Timothy Mar Barbee//704-589-0595 /
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Daniel H Bridges,5009 Silabert Ave Charlotte NC 28205///
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D:-Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ord A Tuvia MRO WQ//704-663-1699/
�A6
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-235-2194/
EPA Forth 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. MD
Page# 1

NPIDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NCG551614 11 121 17 18
16/04/08 ICI
Section D: Summary of, Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)

Permit: NCG551614 Owner -Facility: 2040 Monterosa Road
Inspection Date: 04/08/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No 'NA NE
If the present permit expires in 6 months'or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
❑
application?'
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑ •M
❑ .
❑ .
Is access to the plant.site restricted to the general public?
M
❑
❑
11
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Subject permit expires on 7/31/2018.-
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
❑
.-
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
❑
.M'
. ❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
❑.
0
Q.
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
❑
. ❑
❑
Is the chain. -of -custody complete?
❑,
❑
0
❑ .•
Dates, times and location of sampling
❑
Name of individual performing the sampling
❑
Results of analysis and calibration J
❑
Dates of analysisEl
Name.of person performing analyses
❑
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
-❑ ❑
M
'❑
Has'the facility submitted its annual compliance report to, users and DWQ?
❑ . ❑ •M
-❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑ ❑
0..
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available. and •current?
❑ ❑
M
❑
Is the ORC certified; at ,grade equal -to or higher than the facility classification?
❑j• ❑
0
El
Is the backup operator certified atone grade`less or greater than the facility classification?
❑ ❑
M
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑ ❑
❑
Comment: System has been operational since November 2014. No sampling been done since. At the
time of the inspection (4/8/2016), Tim Barbee, the system operator indicated that he will
provide the necessary sampling within a week. As of 5/16/2016 no sampling
results have
been received. .
Page# 3

Permit: NCG551614 Owner - Facility: 2040 Monterosa Road
Inspection Date: 04/0812016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent -Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ❑ ❑ .E El
Is proper volume collected? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is the, tubing clean? ❑ ❑ .0 ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ -. ❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
representative)?
Comment: System has been operational since November 2014. No sampling has been done.
Laboratory
Yes 'No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or -laboratory?
❑
❑
❑
Are all other, parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by`a certified lab?
❑
' ❑
E.
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
❑
- ❑
0
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
. ❑
0
❑ .
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/-1.0 degrees?
❑
❑_0
❑ -
Comment: System has been operational since November 2014. No sampling has been done.
Septic Tank
Yes No NA. NE -
(If pumps are used) Is an audible and visual alarm operational?
❑
❑
.11
Is septic tank pumped on a schedule?
0 ❑ •M
❑
Are pumps or syphons operating properly?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are high and low:water alarms operating properly?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: A 1000 gallon Septic tank equipped with float switches connected to a visual and audioable
alarm. During the inspection the alarm float'was tested and was operational. The System
has been operational since November 2014. No pumping had to be done vet.
Disinfection - UV
Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site?
❑
❑ ❑
0
Are UV bulbs clean?
❑ El
❑
Is UV intensity adequate? ..
E
❑ ❑
❑
Is transmittance at or above. designed level?
❑ ❑
❑
Is there a backup system on site?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Page#
4

Permit: NCG551614 Owner - Facility: 2040 Monterosa Road
Inspection Date: 04/08/2016 -' Inspection Type.: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection - UV
Yes No NA NE
Is effluent clear and free of solids?
M
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
❑
.M
❑
" Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Flow is calculated -based on pumping rate.
Effluent Pipe
Yes -No NA NE
Is Fight of way to the outfall properly maintained?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required)- are they operating properly?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance
Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
M
❑
❑
1 ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex:-MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
❑
❑
0.
❑
Solids, pH, DO Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Page# 5

March 25, 2014
Memo To: Derek Denard
From: Michael ParkerNp
Subject: Daniel Bridges Residence (proposed)
General Permit No. NCG551614
Cabarrus County
This Office has conducted a preliminary review of the subject SFR permit application received in this
Office on February 10, 2014: Specifically, Mr. Bridges has applied to install a pre-fab wastewater treatment
system to serve a proposed 4-bedroom on a lot of approximately 4+ acres. Listed below are the items not
provided in the application that are necessary in order for the Division to complete the review of this project:
Information provided in the application indicated that an independent soils evaluation had been
conducted of -the proposed site; however, this soils evaluation was not included in the application
package. A review of this independent soils evaluation will be necessary in order to properly review
this application request.
2. There was no evaluation by the applicant's engineer of other on -site non -discharge alternatives such as
drip irrigation or spray irrigation. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c) (2), a summary of all waste treatment
disposal options that were considered should be included in the application and why the proposed
system was selected. This summary should provide enough detail to ascertain whether all non -
discharge disposal options (both surface and subsurface) have been evaluated by a soils specialist.
3. A site visit was made on March 20, 2014. Observations made during the site visit indicate that the
drainage pattern at the proposed point of discharge would carry the effluent from this proposed
residence westward along Merivee Drive, through a roadside culvert underneath Monterosa Road, and
then northwestward into the yard of an nearby homeowner. There is no indication in the application
that the downslope property owner has been made aware of the fact that effluent from an upslope SFR
Would be released onto their property nor is there any documentation that the down slope property
owner has provided consent to allow this wastewater to travel across their property.
It should be noted that 15A NCAC 02B .0206(d)(2) stipulates that if the 7.Q 10 and 30Q2 flows of the
proposed receiving waters are estimated to be zero, then no new or expanded discharges of oxygen consuming
wastes can be allowed. Based on our preliminary review of this application (and the March 20`h site visit), there is
no stream on this property and the proposed discharge from this system is planned for a roadside ditch where no -
7Q10/30Q2 flow exists. It is my understanding that the Division is not applying the aforementioned Rule to
SFRs, and that the issuance of SFR permits is not contingent on whether or not they have access to surface waters
for which to assimilate their wastewater. Furthermore, consideration for SFR permit issuance apparently is not
being given to whether or not a residence has been established on the lot. This means that SFR permits are being
issued to allow for discharges from residences proposed for undeveloped lots where local County Health
Departments have determined that conventional subsurface systems cannot be approved.

Page Two
If SFR discharges are being approved to dry ditches and channels having 7Q10/30Q2 flows that are
estimated to be zero, this would appear to be contrary to the intent of the Rule noted above. Furthermore,
allowing the issuance of SFR permits on undeveloped lots imposes added pressure on the Division to authorize'
discharges on lots which likely should not be developed due to extremelypoor draining soils, topographical -
constraints such as in flood prone areas, or they. happen to be located adjacent to a water supply reservoir where
direct access to the reservoir (via pipe) is not allowed by the regulating utility company. In most cases, there are
generally good reasons why certain lots sit empty for years in built -out developments — there is no acceptable
subsurface means of handling the disposal of the wastewater generated from a residence built on the property.
Typically, these lots are offered for sale at substantially cheaper prices than adjacent lots where conventional
septic systems have been approved by the Division of Environmental Health (DEH)., Eventually, these marginal
lots with- poor soils or other topographic issues become attractive to prospective homeowners so much so that they
are willing to ignore their due diligence and buy the property in the hope that they can get some kind of disposal
system permitted. Fortunately, many prospective homeowners do not enter into a contractual agreement on the
property, so their inability to obtain a SFR permit does not pose an economic hardship. However, a number of
cases have come through this Office where sufficient soils information existed prior to the sale of the property
that documented the existence of poorly drained soils or severe topographical constraints and the buyer continued
with the purchase of the lot without assurance of a permanent wastewater disposal option.
This Office has historically denied all SFR applications except in cases where there was an existing
residence and DEH and outside soil experts had documented that there were no surface or sub -surface non -
discharge alternatives. Even when SFR permits were granted in this region, attempts were made to obtain direct
access to surface waters so that assimilation of the effluent could be met. Allowing discharges to dry, ditches and
other conveyances sets the Division up for complaints from down gradient property owners from both an aesthetic
as well as a public health standpoint. Continuing to allow dry -ditch discharges from SFRS highlights a level of
disparity that exists in our NPDES application review process for SFRs, but not other NPDES domestic
wastewater permits.
/mlp

��
,�' P /1��
�� n1�
���

WATER RESOURCES
Wes Bell
James Bealle
Marcia Allocco
Dee Browder
Andrew Pitner
Mike Parker
Sujatha Nagulapally
Debbie Luckman
Alan Johnson
Barbara Sifford
Kent Smith
Maria Schutte

DIVgSi ,, �`i.ATER QUALITY
Y
APR 2 4 2014
OFFICE
ivc
r Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
-' - - --- - -' 1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
mikeIalashEnsineerinaxom
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Daniel Bridges; Wastewater System
Direct Discharge, NC.DWQ Application Submittal
Revisions
RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
Table of Contents APR 21 2014
Water Resources
1. Table of Contents Permitting Section
2. Response (in red) to Review Comments
3. Soil '& Site Evaluation (from Soil Scientist)
4. Engineer's Evaluation,of Drip & Spray Disposal
5. Town of Harrisburg — Available Sewer — additional email
6. Engineer's Sewer Availability Report
Also: 3 Sets of Plans are included in this submittal.
a. Plans revised to show Drip & Spray setbacks
b. Units moved to reflect 15' off foundation.
c. 1,000 gallon septic tank labeled.

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
April 14, 2014
Derek Denard
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC. 27699-1617
Re: Bridges Property, Cabarrus County
Response to State Review comments in red
We have received comments from the regional office for the subject project. Before we can
move forward we need the following additional information:
• Information provided in the application indicated that an independent soils evaluation had
been conducted of the proposed site; however, this soils evaluation was not included in
the application package. A review of this independent soils evaluation will be necessary
in order to properly review this application request. A copy of the Soil Scientist Report
has been included in this submittal.
There was no evaluation by the applicant's engineer of other on -site non -discharge
alternatives such as drip irrigation or spray irrigation. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c) (2),
a summary of all waste treatment disposal options that were considered should be
included in the application and why the proposed system was selected. This summary
should provide enough detail to ascertain whether all non -discharge disposal options
(both surface and subsurface) have been evaluated by a soils specialist. Spray and drip
irrigation non -discharge systems are permitted under 15A NCAC 02T .0600 and
information on this program can be found at the following web -site:
http://portal.ncdenr.or web/wq/aps/lau/applications An evaluation into the use of Drip
or Spray irrigation was completed by the Engineer using, the Soil Scientist
recommendations. A copy of that Evaluation is included in this Submittal.
• Please provide the approximate distance in mileage or feet and cost for construction in
dollars to the nearest municipal sewer collection system to, demonstrate for our record
that this alternative is cost prohibitive. The nearest municipality in this location may be
contacted for an estimate of the cost per foot for sewer construction. A copy of the

Municipality email and associated Engineers Report is included in this submittal. In
short, the distance is far and there is a moratorium.
• On the site plans please indicate if the `Septic tank and Sepitech treatment units are at the
minimum setback of 15 feet from the building foundation/basement. Plans were revised
to show and dimension this setback from the foundation.
• The site plans on page 1 of 3 has a diagram in upper left corner of the septic tank and is
labeled as 1,250 gallons; however the septic tanks was labeled or indicated elsewhere
(right below in bigger print) as a 1,000 gallon septic tank. Please make the necessary
corrections. The correction'was made.
All corrections to the plans were noted as a revision and,clouded for identification.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call or contact me.
Thanks,
Michael Lash, PE.

THOMPSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
WATER ♦ WASTEWATER ♦ WETLANDS
PHASE I SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION
2040 Monterosa Road
Concord, North Carolina
Cabarrus County
PIN:55250924570000
April 2, 2014
Prepared for:
Daniel H. Bridges, PE
121 West Trade Street
Suite 1950
Charlotte, NC 28202
980-253-1269
Prepared by:
Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Larry Thompson, REHS, PWS, LSS
PO Box 541
Midland, NC 28107-0541
Cell: 704-301-4881
Fax: [phone]
larry@thompsonenucom
P.O BOX 541! MIDLAND, NC r 28107-0541
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
E-MAIL: LARRIQTHOMPSONENV.COM
WEB: WWW.THOMPSONENV.COM
.ZC� C'"0
Q pkS Eq ,
SEAL :
ti 1208 9

2040 Monterosa Road — 2 — November 26, 2013
INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (TEC) has performed a..Phase I Soil and Site
Evaluation for septic tank suitability on approximately 3.48 acres of land located at 2040
Monterosa Road in Concord, North Carolina (PIN: 55250924570000). The property was
evaluated in accordance with North Carolina statutes for waste disposal ("Laws and Rules for
Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems", Sections .1940 through .1944 (amended August
2007).
The property is currently undeveloped and has been previously cleared. Various stages of
secondary successional growth are evident.
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
The site evaluation was performed on November 25`'': A rubber track compact excavator was
utilized to dig deep pits throughout the study area. Observations of landscape (slope, drainage
patterns, past use, etc.) as well as soil properties (depth, texture, structure, seasonal wetness,
restrietive horizons, etc.) to unsuitable features were recorded.
FINDINGS
The most limiting soil property with respect to on -site suitability was depth to expansive clay
and unsuitable saprolitc. The surface texture is clay loam with subangular blocky structure
and is less than 12 inches in depth. Subsoil texture is predominately clay with angular blocky.
structure. The saprolite texture is clay loam with a granular structure. The soils were, for.the
most part, fairly consistent and would be classified as "Unsuitable" for the installation of a
subsurface wastewater treatment and disposal system based upon the "Laws and Rules for
Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems", Section .1900 of the North Carolina Administrative
Code; specifically Section .1943 Soil Depth and .1956 Modifications to Septic Tank Systems.
CONCLUSIONS
TEC is not aware of any surface (surface drip or spray irrigation) or subsurface wastewater
treatment disposal system (accepted, innovative, controlled demonstration, etc.) that is
currently approved by the state of North Carolina that can be used to assist with the
development of this property.
The findings presented herein represent TEC's professional opinion based upon opr soil and
site evaluation and knowledge of the current laws and regulations governing waste not
discharged to surface waters in addition to on -site wastewater systems in North Carolina (Title
15A NCAC 2T and 18A .1900).
This report has been prepared for planning purposes only. Any concurrence with the findings
of this report would be made by a representative of the Cabarrus County Environmental

2040 Monterosa Road — 3 — November 26, 2013
Health Department, the delegated authority for septic system permitting within Cabarrus
County or a representative of the North Carolina Division of Water- Resources.

Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 541
Midland, NC 28107-0641
704-3014881
OWNER: Daniel H. Bridges
LOCATION: 2040 Moterossa Road
SHEET 1 OF
COUNTY: Cabarrus
TAX ID: 55250924570000
DATE: November 25, 2013
PROFILES
Pit 1
Pit 2
Pit 3
Pit 4
Pit 5
Pit 6
Pit 7
LANDSCAPE POSITION
.1940
Is
Is
Is
Is
Is.
Is
Is
SLOPE °o
.1940
50/6-
50/6-
5%
5%
5%
50% --
5%
HORIZON I'DEPTH
.1943
0-3
0-6
0-5
0-4
0-6
0-4
0-5
TEXTURE
.1941 a) 1
cl
cl
cl
cl
cl _
cl
cl
CONSISTENCE
1941
fr
fr
fr
fr
fr
fr.
fr
STRUCTURE
.1941 121a
g r
gr
g r
g r
g r
g r
9 r
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a)(3)
HORIZON 2 DEPTH
.1943
3-24
6-36
5-36
4-32
6-34
4-24
5-32
a
TEXTURE
.1941 a) 1
c
e
e
e
e
e
e
CONSISTENCE
.1941
vfi
vfi
vfi
vfi
vfi
vfi
vfi
STRUCTURE
.1941 a 2
abk
abk
abk
abk
abk
abk.
abk
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a) (3)
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
HORIZON 3 DEPTH
1943
36-75+
36-75+
34-75+
24-75+
TEXTURE
.1941 a 1
cl
cl
CI
cl
CONSISTENCE
.1941
fr
fr
fr
fr
STRUCTURE
.1941 (a)(2)
r
gr
gr
gr
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 a)(3)-
-
-
HORIZON 4 DEPTH
.1943
TEXTURE
.1941 a (1
CONSISTENCE
.1941
STRUCTURE
.1941 (a)(2)
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a) 3
SOIL WETNESS
.1942
RESTRICTIVE HORIZON
.1944
24
32
32
SAPROLITE
.1943/.1956
36+
36+
34+
24+
OSSIFICATION
A948
u
u LH
u
u
u
u
L.T.A. R: (gpd/ft)
.1955
OTHER FACTORS .1946 :
SITE LTAR (gpd/ftz): NIA
AVAILABLE SPACE .1945 : unsuitable
SITE CLASSIFICATION (.1948): unsuitable
SYSTEM TYPE: N/A
EVALUATED BY: Larry Thompson OTHERS PRESENT:
COMMENTS:

PIN 55159876670000 04*
Property Real ID 01-029-0051.00
Physical Address: 2009 MONTEROSARD CONCORD NC 28025
Owner Name 1: JAMIESON WILLIAM HOWARD SR
Owner Name 2:
Mailing Address: 2009 MONTEROSARD
Mail City: CONCORD
Mail State: NC
Mail Zip: 28025
Parcel PIN 55159876670000
Land Units 293
Land Units Type
AC
Calculated Acreage
2926021
Land Value
52910
Building Value
152310
Assessed Value
205220
Market Value
205220
Cabarrus County shall not be held fable for any errors in the Map Created By Cabarrus County IT Department
data represented on this record. This Includes errors ofomisson, Data Sources:CabarrusCoun Land Records
canrrssion, concun�g the cont�toffhe data and rdatiye
positional accuracy of the data. The data carrot be construed to
be a legal document. Primary sources from which itdsdata was . Source: Esri, DigialGlobe, GeolEye, imbed, USDA, IISGS, AEK
compiled must be consulted forverificaton-Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, s4sstopo, and Im G8S UserCanmunty
of information represented on this map document.
1:1,128
0 0.0075 0.015 - 0.03 ft
0 0.015 0.03 0.06 m
Print Date: April 10, 2014

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Evaluation of
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewaier/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr brive
Matthews, NC' IgiB
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Drip & Spray Irrigation Systems
Bridges: 2040 Monterosa Road
An evaluation of the soils was completed by the Soil Scientist,and his evaluation
included the use of Spray or Surface Drip disposal systems. His findings were
such that the soils were not adequate for these type disposal systems,
The setbacks for these systems were added to the plan. Spray has the most
restrictive setbacks with the 150' off the property lines and 100' from the water
well as the most restrictive. It is not customary for Lash Engineering to propose
spray irrigation on a smaller site that will be used for a residential use. The useable
available land for spray is approximately 0.25 acres or 1500 sf 'The soil is not
adequate for this alternative so the spray irrigation alternative was not investigated
further.
The setbacks for the Surface Drip System were also added to the plan. These
setbacks are less restrictive and are more conducive to a small site residential
setting. The useable land is approximately 0.50 acres or 2500 sf. The soil is not
adequate for this alternative so the Surface Drip alternative was not investigated
further.
Based upon the Soil Scientist. report, the available land for disposal and the lack of
sufficient adequate soils; it is our opinion that a Direct Discharge system with a
Denitrofication treatment, and a VY light for disinfection is the preferred
alternative.

RE: Daniel Bridges Residential Wastewater
Subject: RE: Daniel bridges Residential Wastewater
From: "Josh Watkins" <JWatkins@harrisburgnc:org>
Date: 4/15/2014 2:23 PM
To: "Michael Lash, PE." <[e-mail]>
Mike,
There is no public sewer available.to this site. The closest sewer
interceptor is along the Reedy Creek, to the north of this property.
The Town of Harrisburg and Cabarrus County have an interlocal agreement
that restricts utility extensions south of the Reedy Creek interceptor.
Even if the interceptor ran through this property; no taps into the line
would be allowed uhtil.at least January 1, 2016.
Please let me know if you have any questions. I will be happy to assist
With anything yod may need.
Thanks,
Josh Watkins
Planning Director
Town of Harrisburg
-----Original Message -----
From: Michael Lash, PE.[mailto:mikelol'ashengineering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April i5, 20i4 2:09 PM
To: Josh Watkins
Subject: Daniel Bridges Residential Wastewater
I am hoping that Tom Bock has spoken to you about this already. I have
included an USGS map that shows the location of the property.
I.am an engineer and have designed an advanced wastewater treatment
system for Mr. Bridges and submitted it to the State. Earlier, I
received from Derek Slocum an email that stated that public sewer was
not available, which is a requirement with the State. His statement was
riot detailed enough and the State has requested that I sdpply .them with
more information. In talking with Tom it appears that cost of the
extension is not the question but that the area has an extension
restriction (Area 1) to it making a flow acceptance impossible at this
time.
I need something official to include in my resubmittal that states in
more detail that public sewer is not available to this site. A reply to
this email is sufficient.
If sewer is available, then a location of the closest manhole would be
sufficient.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Mike
[phone]
1 of
4/15/20142:33 Pb

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
mikel@_LashEngineering.com
Bridges - Public Sewer Availability
Josh Watkins (Planning Director) and Derek Slocum (Town Engineer) were contacted on different
occasions for the availability of sewer for this property. Other municipalities were contacted as well;
the Town of Midland. Town of Locust, and Stanly County. The Town of Harrisburg has jurisdiction
and an email from Josh Watkins has been included in this submittal.
Derek Slocum responded initially to me with an email statement (in previous submittal) that no
public sewer was available. The email submitted with this submittal provides more detail
information. According to our conversations, this area falls within Area #1 of an Interlocal
Agreement. Area #1 currently has a moratorium on wastewater availability for at least another 2
years — so, no sewer allocation is possible for this site.
In his email, Josh points out that the nearest sewer is currently located along Reedy Creek, which is
north of this site. Gravity sewer would actually be able to flow north. The distance is approximately
6,300 feet. So, if sewer were available the approximate cost would be in the neighborhood of.
Approximate costs:
630078" gravity sewer laid adjacent'to the existing tributary creek.
@ $ 110.00/ft. for manholes, easement acquisition, surveying and installation » $700,000
Additional cost for crossing to other side of f creek could easily add another $50,000.
Total Approximate Cost $750,000
Conclusion:
There are no plans for extending the sanitary sewer closer to the site at this time. The distance and
associated costs for these improvements are cost prohibitive for a single homeowner. R/W access
may not even be available from the appropriate land owners. But paramount to the costs, is that there
is a moratorium on the sewer facilities from accepting additional flow.
If I can be of any further service; please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Michael Lash, PE.

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/ W astewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Daniel Bridges; Wastewater System
Direct Discharge, NC.DWQ Application Submittal
Table of Contents
1. Cover Sheet
2. Table of Contents
3. Authorization Letter
4. Health Department Turndown Letter
5. Engineer's Project Summary
6. NC.DWQ — Permit Application Form-D
7. Copy of Check for Permit ($60.00)
8. Setback and Site Parameters Letter
9. UV Light Letter .
10. UV Light Specification (Cutsheet)
11. UV Light Headloss Calculation
12. Gould Pump (Cutsheet)
13. Town of Harrisburg, Available Sewer — email
14. Watershed Classification (email from State)
15. Lash Engineering as Authorized Designer (Septitech)
16. Septic Tank Cut -Sheet
17. Bridges USGS Topo Map
Also: 3 Sets of Plans and original check are included in this submittal.

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
—_ Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
January 23, 2014
Joe Corporon
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC. 27699-1617
Re: Bridges Property, Cabarrus County
Letter of Authorization
Gentlemen:
I have engaged Michael Lash, PE. With Lash Engineering, Inc. to assist me in preparing and
filing a National. Pollution Discharge Elimination System application for the above captioned
single family lot.
This letter will serve to certify that I have designated him as my authorized representative for this
application.
_J
Very truly yours,
Digitally signed by
[e-mail] .
a�-5—,=[e-mail]
cn=[e-mail]
Date �014.01.2317:03:17-05'00'
Daniel Bridges

I
CABARRUS
HEALTH
ALLIANCE
at NC Research Campus
January 23, 2014
Dear Daniel Bridges,
�I
This letter is to confirm our phone conversation concerning lots 9 and 10, Block "C", Section 1 in
the Monterosa Subdivision in Cabarrus County. The address of the property is 2040 Monterosa
Rd, Concord N.C. 28025 (PIN # 55250924670000).
I The Cabarrus Health Alliance Environmental Health section evaluated the above referenced
property for the purpose of determining the suitability of the land for some type of ground
i
absorption waste water disposal system. The evaluation was done in accordance with the laws
and rules governing wastewater systems in North Carolina General Statute 130A-333 including
related statutes and Title 15A, Subchapter 18A, of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Rule
i
.1900 and related rules.
Based on the criteria set out in Title 15A, Subchapter 18A, of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, Rule .1940 through .1948, the evaluation indicated that the site is UNSUITABLE for a
ground absorption sewage system. The site is unsuitable based on the following: )
• Unsuitable soil characteristics (structure or clay mineralogy) (Rule .1941)
• Unsuitable soil wetness condition (Rule .1942)
• Unsuitable soil depth (Rule .1943)
• Presence of restrictive horizon (Rule .1944)
• Insufficient space for septic system and repair area (Rule .1945)
The site evaluation included consideration of possible site modifications, and modified,
innovative, or alternative systems. However, it is our determination that none of the above
options will overcome the severe conditions on this site.
If there are any questions concerning this matter please feel free to contact me at the Cabarrus
Health Alliance.
Respectfully,
David M. Troutman, REHS
Director of Environmental Health
Cabarrus Health Alliance
704-920-1211
[e-mail]
300 Mooresville Road - Kannapolis, NC 28081 - 704.920.1000 www.cabarrusheaith.org

Lash Engineering, Inc..
Civil/Consulting/W astewater/Plann ingI
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
mikel a.LasKrigineerins.com
Lash Enguleeririg, Inc.
Project Summary for:
Bridges: 2040 Monterosa Road
Town of Concord, NC.
Cabarrus County
The project is located at 2040 Monterosa Road, NC close to the town of Concord,
NC. in Cabarrus County. There is one home proposed for this system. There are
no homes adjacent to this lot but 2 existing homes across the street. This is shown
on the plan. A direct discharge system for the wastewater effluent was proposed
because of the lack of adequate available soils either on or offsite. The Watershed
Classification for this area is "C", within the Reedy Creek watershed. The system
will consist of a new 1;000 gal septic tank, a new Septitech PreTreat unit, and an
Ultraviolet disinfection unit outside,_the Septitech unit to sterilize the effluent
before it is discharged into the ditch. The .Septitech effluent pump is adequate for
this discharge. There is no need for a pump tank.
The owner hired an independent Soil Scientist to make a detailed analysis of the
soils on the site. He deterinined that. expansive clays were 10" to 12" below the
existing surface and that the saprolite was inconsistent. The Health Department
was consulted and concurred with the findings of the Soil Scientist. A copy of the
Health Department "Denial Letter" is included in this submittal.
The proposed system will be designed for 4 bedrooms each at 120 gallons per day.
This will give a total flow of 480 gallons per day. The system will utilize a
proposed 1,000 gallon septic tank and a proposed .Septitech unit (M400D-UV-
fibreglass) with a UV light for the removal of pathogens. A cleanout is also
proposed at the exit of the effluent pipe to assist with cleaning.. The UV light is
located on the discharge side of the Septitech unit in a self-contained box so the
treated effluent is passing through the light. The UV light is the last stage the
effluent passes prior to being discharged. The head losses of the effluent passing

through the UV light are very minor (negligible):. I have included these
-� calculations. Should the ITV light fail to operate, a voltage signal is sent to the
control panel and the system is shut down until the light is operational. This
protects the side ditch against the possibility of treated effluent that has not had the
pathogens killed from entering the ditch system.
The system utilizes a Septitech Control Panel that has been designed to work for
this unit. The panel is housed within a NEMA 4X" enclosure that is setup for the
floats, pumps and internal monitoring of the system. A programmable micro -logic
controller (PLC) activates the recirculation, and discharge . pumps through a
program that self -adjusts these operations based on actual wastewater flow into the
processor (as monitored by the PLC). The processor constantly evaluates the water
usage and meters out the effluent discharge to the disposal area at the "appropriate
interval to assure proper effluent treatment.
The proposed septic tank is made of precast concrete and the proposed Septitech
unit is made of fiberglass. Floatation of the tank is not a factor as the unit is being
installed in Bridges yard which is approximately 4' above the road.

1 4

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. DENR / Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES PermitFNCOO
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
-I Owner Name
Daniel Bridges
Facility Name
Bridges WWTP
Mailing Address
5009 Silabot Ave.
- City
Charlotte
State / Zip Code
NC 28205'
- Telephone Number
[phone]
Fax Number
(N/A)
e-mail Address
[e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same address as above
Street Address or State Road 2040 Monterosa Road
City Concord
State / Zip Code NC 28025
County Cabarrus
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not
referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
_- Name Daniel Bridges
Mailing Address 5009 Silabot Ave.
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code NC 28205
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number (N/A)
e-mail Address [e-mail]..
i
1 of 3
Form-D 11/12

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
4. Description of wastewater:
Facility Generating
Wastewater(check all that apply):
_ Industrial
❑
Number of Employees
Commercial
❑
Number of Employees
Residential
®
Number of Homes 1
-I School
❑
Number of Students/Staff
Other
❑
Explain:
Describe the source(s) of wastewater (ekample: subdivision, mobile home park, shopping centers,
restaurants," etc.):
Residential 100% - Up to 4 Bedroom House at 480gpd
Number of persons served: 4 bedrooms
5. Type of collection system
® Separate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and sanitary sewer)
6. Outfall Information:
Number of separate discharge points 1
Outfall Identification numbers), i
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Name of receiving stream(s) (NEW applicants: Provide a map showing the exact location of each
outfall):
Ditch on Property to Tributary
S. Frequency of Discharge:, ® Continuous
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge. occurs: Duration:
❑ " Intermittent
9. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacities, provide design removal for BOD, TSS, nitrogen and
phosphorus. If the space provided is not sufficient, attach the description of the treatment system in a
separate sheet of paper.
An existing 1,000 gallon septic tank is capable of handling 480 gallons per day. The
Septitech Unit (pretreat) will be "installed with an Ultra Violet disinfectant light and a
pump capable of handling the 7 feet of pressure head needed for direct discharge to the
side ditch. The Se
ptitech Unit is designated as an M40OD-UV.
2 of 3 Form-D 11/12

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
10. FIow Information:
Treatment Plant Design flow 0.00048 (480 gpd) MGD
Annual Average daily flow 0.1752 (480*365/ 1,000,000) MGD (for the previous 3 years)
Maximum daily flow 0.00048 (480 god) MGD (for the previous 3 years)
11. Is this facility located on Indian country?
❑ Yes ® No
12. Effluent Data - TS U Treatment
NEW APPLICANTS: Provide. data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coliform, Temperature and pH shall be grab
samples, for all other parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported,
report daily'ma;dmum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported report as daily maximum.
RENEWAL -APPLICANTS: - Provide" the highest single reading (Daily Maximum) and Monthly Average .
n TJp_r tha_ nnct .4Fi mnnthc fnr nnrnmoforc rorrronfhi in irnirr "or 4f hz i- ^4L _ gnif A s
Parameter
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Units of
Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS)
10
mg/L
Fecal Coliform
400
colonies/ 100m1
Total Suspended Solids
10
mg/L
Temperature (Summer)
N/A
Temperature (Winter)
N/A
PH
N/A
13. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications:
Type . Permit Number Type Permit Number
Hazardous Waste (RCRA) N/A NESHAPS (CAA) N/A
UIC (SDWA) N/A Ocean Dumping (MPRSA) N/A
NPDES N/A Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA) N/A
PSD (CAA) N/A Other . N/A
Non -attainment program (CAA) N/A
14. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such -information, is true, complete, and accurate.
Y I JR
Owner
P ' d name of Person Signin Title'
Signature of Applicant ate
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2).states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation,,or certification in any
application, record, report,.plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implemenring that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method
required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001
provides a punishment by a fine of not more than S25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
3 of 3 Form-D 11112

D. ss-noa�z > 4 7 4.2-`
BRIDGES 3
,,; •, J.,BRiDGES'- 5ooq s;iabpr-}-chit
; ys2o5 ilr ... l 1
CHARLOTTE; NC -- -- f
p"Q,
State Emp ogees' Credit Unio_n9
Harrisburg, North Carolina
203lyp
�:2.5317704-9�:086�850350311' 4742'-

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
w - 1104, Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC. 29105
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
January 24, 2014
Joe Corporon
NPDES Permitting Program
Division.of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC. 27699-1617
Re: Bridges Property; Site Parameters & Setback Requirements
This site is located at the, end of Monterosa Road in Concord, NC in Cabarrus County. The lot for the .
proposed house has been denied by the Health Department and a denial. letter has been submitted with this
submittal. In addition, a Soil Scientist (Larry Thompson) was asked to make a more intensive review of
the property with pits and could not find adequate or provisional soils. The lot is flat with slight
downward declines toward the street. The Owner has consulted with adjacent land owners and no
adequate soil'was found that was available.
There is an existing ditch along the existing road in front of the property that drains to an existing 24".
culvert. From the culvert the ditch drains to a tributary of Reedy Creek. The system will discharge to an
existing ditch that 'drains'to this 24" culvert. The length of travel within this onsite ditch is approximate
200'.
It appears from our site visit that a direct discharge system is the best option. 1-have located. -the new
wastewater system in the rear/side yard; 8' away from the proposed foundation and, more than 50' from
the proposed water well. The effluent will be pumped slightly uphill and be discharged -directly into the
existing grassed ditch where it will travel roughly 200' before being collected into the existing street 24"
culvert and conveyed to an existing tributary of Reedy Creek.
If I canbe of any further service, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
f
Michael Lash, PE.

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
,Matthews, NC 28105
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]'.com
Lash Engineering, Iic.
January 23, 2014
Joe Corporon
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC. 27699-1617
Re: Bridges Property UV Light Analysis
UV lights of a low flow nature are typically a low pressure type, short wave, mercury vapor discharge
tube that produces ultraviolet wavelengths lethal to microorganisms. The low,pressure allows the
units to run with less power and thereby generating less heat for longer life of the bulbs. The Emperor
Aquatics UV "High Output" Light has been specified for this project.
The spectrum of UV light that is lethal is called UV-C. This includes a wavelength range within 240-
280 nm. A wavelength around 254 to 2.64 is considered ideal. This lamp is set to 254 nm.
Different microorganisms are extinguished at different'doses. The larger "pests" take longer. Fecal
Coliforms are extinguished at near 6600 µWs/cm. This lamp has a range up.to 30,000 µWs/cm.
Although there is a wide spectrum of bacteria, viruses and protozoa, most of the "pests" are
extinguished between 2,000 and 20,000. Having a -range up to 30,000. µWs/cm, assures that the
germicidal action is most effective across this wide range. For this application, fecal coliforms are
most important, which have a dose requirement of about 6600 µWs/cm. This is well within range.
The glass plays an important function in the effectiveness of the lamp in that the glass can absorb the
UV-C wavelength. The hard quartz glass is most effective and is"utilized in -the "high output" unit.
An additional coating "L"'is added to the glass that adds resistance to "solarization" so that the bulb
remains highly effective for longer periods.
The Emperor Smart HQ UV Light has been submitted for review because of its ability to be installed
in the vertical or horizontal position. It clearly has the UV qualifications to be effective. The
requirements for vertical placement are spelled out in the installation guidelines with a warning to
insure the power head is above the water line. The power unit cannot be submerged. This note has
been added to the plans. This unit is acceptable -for use in this application and is accepted for use on
this project.
Sincerely,
Michael Lash, PE.

` ,�..
�" ! � i�.

U►LTRAVI�©LET DISo'Mr--CT .©N SYSTEM
System Description
SeptiTech has made a recent change in the preferred manufacturer of ultraviolet (UV)
disinfection system for use in systems that require disinfection prior to discharge. The
reason for the recent change is that the manufacturer of the UV unit previously used
(Siemens Sunlight Systems UV) has been discontinued by the manufacturer and is no
longer available.
Therefore, SeptiTech has chose to use the Emperor Aquatics Smart High Output UV
Sterilizer model 025050150. This unit is rated at the following specifications:
Water Flow Rate: 1,560 —1,980 gph (26 — 33 gpm)
Ouput: 30,000 µWs/cm2
Operating pressure: 20 psi
Voltage: 120 VAC @ 60Hz
No. Lamps / Watts: 1 lamp @ 50 watts
The UV unit is rated for 26-33 gpm at 20 psi operating pressure. SeptiTech will provide
a flow restrictor and pressure regulator on the discharge of the pump in order to ensure
that the operating parameters and not exceeded during operation.
A technical cut sheet, installation guide and operation and maintenance manual from the
manufacturer have been provided as part of this memo.
Control and Alarm
The operation of the UV unit is the same as it was previously for the Siemens Sunlight
Systems product.. The control panel is outfitted to provide power to the UV unit along
with a current sensor. Power to the UV unit is on all the time as long as power to the
control panel is provided. The current sensor is used to detect that current is being drawn
from the UV bulb. If the bulb was to fail to operate, current would no longer flow to the
bulb, and an alarm would be triggered at the control panel as the current sensor would no
longer detect current flow:

Frictional Losses
Frictional losses through. the UV unit are minimal since the UV chamber is larger than
the discharge piping used with the discharge assembly. The UV unit has 2-inch inlets
-, and a 5-inch chamber. Based on calculations using factors from Cameron Hydraulic Data
handbook, the total frictional head loss assuming a flow rate of 30 gpm is 0.00856 ft
(assumed to be negligible). Head loss calculations are attached.
ATTACHMENT A:
Technical Cut Sheet
ATTACHMENT B:
Installation and Operation & Maintenance Manual
ATTACHMENT C:
Friction Loss Calculations

Applications:
• Fish Culture
u Live Seafood Holding Systems.
9 Aquarium/Exhibits -
• Mamrnal/Reptile/Avian Bathing Pools Vine
• Water Features _
FLInCtion:
Clarification (Waterborne Algae Control)
Harmful Pathogen Disinfectant
Q Ozone Destruction .,.....—
Perform nee
Pond, Aquarium, Exhl sit, Re-- +arch & Aquocu.Rure
SMART UV...The Professional's Choice!
More animal husbandry and aquatic professionals choose SMART UVs over
competing UV brands because of our substantiated performance information,
effective product design and overall quality. With over thirty models to choose
from, Emperor Aquatics, Inc, has the right SMART UV to fit your application.
Optiniurn I-V-C NrtFo'i'g'nance
Size — Our SMART UV design always considers the lamp's UV C output and
_ length, while most competitors ignore these critical performance factors. This
explains why, in most cases, our equipment is physically larger.
.Advantages:
Modelsshownwith "'
optional mounting damps
mint UStaV01zfir
Simmer
���� �� � SII3PIliipet'
Lamp position — Our lamps are always positioned entirely between the inlet and
outlet water ports, utilizing the lamp's full are length to its maximum potential.
Lamp Life — Long -Lasting GPH/T5 (tow-Pressure/Standard-Output) & T5 (Low
Pressure/High-Output) UV lamps offer 9,000 hours of continual operation equals
->80% efficiency at end of lamp life. These lamps use a specially coated "L" type hard
quartz glass that extends the life of the lamp while preventing the build-up of nitrogen
by-products (scaling) on the lamp's outer surface (Scaling diminishes UV-C transmit-
tance). These nitrogen by-products are a problem commonly associated with ozone
producing "VH" type glass UV lamps.
Water Flow Rates — SMART UV flow rates represent the equipment's true capacity,
which considers the lamp's UV-C output, lamp length, exposure chambers inside
diameter, and UV transmissibility for specified UV dosages as per our specification
charts.

A

Section I hree ...... ......... ..._. .
2" Diarnete �' Li �•���sl. uric, '6�lwtk���f �n UL Listed
Models for Small Ponds, Aquariums, and Research Applications r
"tee•"'^,-:..i.�n k�J �) '
^-,Water Flow Rate Water Flow Rate sn�
No. Algae'& -Bacteria Protozoa
Model No.
/Watts
Maximum Maximum
Pond Size Aquarium Size
Lamps 30,000 pWs/cm2.".-"'-.:•..1,80 opo pWS/cm2 Input Output Dim.
/Watt Suggested/Maximum Su ggested/Malcimum Watts Watts (Inches)
inlet
/Outlet
Input
Voltage
02218/18 :.
1,100 Gal.
60 Gal.
1/18 ;_
2.13.GPH/356 GPH :.:.
' .37 GPH/60 GPH
:BG: D 5 :.';21.75 "t2S':.;]
S° Union
.120VAC50/601-1z
02225/25. '.
1,700 Gal.
90 Gal.
_ 4125
332 GPH/554 GPH
SS GPH/92 GPH ..'
25 '' < 2y 75' x 2S"
1 S".Union
]zOVAC 50180Hz
02240/40
2,900Gal.
160GSI.-'
1/40
..589GPH/983.GPH
:98GPH/164GPH
. 40 .. 14 4475J7251- _4ZL, nion.:�-'120VAC50/60Hz.
02280/80 .
5,900.Gal.- A
n� 330 Gal.
2140
:1,178 GPH/1,967 GPH
196 GPH/328 GPH
80 28 44.75" x 14"
15" Unlon
120VAC 50/6.OHz.
+ Indicates popular models
Also Available with Quartz Sleeve Wipers
Adapter Fittings are not included
E Nam ~p Ste iliter
3" Diameter UV Housirig, I`flabei ight & UL Listed oo,
Modeals.for Moderately Sized Ponds, Aquariums, and Exhibit/Research Applications
e r
Water Flow Rate Water Flow Rate
No. Algae & Bacteria Protozoa= - _ UV-C
Model No.
Maximum
Maximum
Lamps, 3Q,000 pWs/cm2 -• 186,_6d( IWs/cm2 Input Output
Dim.
Inlet
Input
/Watts
Pond Size Aquarium Size
q
/Watt Su ggestedlMaximum
Suggested/Maximum Watts Watts
(Inches)
/Outlet
Voltage
02625/25 .-
2,400 Gal.
130 Gal.
1•/25_ ' .:' 472 GPH/788 GPH :
.:. , ,9-60J V131 GPH, :,' : 25 .. '; :' .'8. >
.; ,29" x.5.5° :
.;1 S'.' Union
: 120VA.0 50/60Hz
02040/40..
4,700Gal.
260G10"'
1/40 943.GPH/1,574GPH'.':
.. ..
157GPH/262GPH, 40 .' 14
4375".x3S"
15 Union
120VAC50/60Hz,
8,600 Gal '�480 Gal.
...
1/65 ::1,710GPH/2,..55GPH
. , - 285 GPH/476 GPH �-s75 :::7p5"x35";..15".Union.:
'120VAC50/60Hz
02080/89,400
U
Gal.
530 Gal.
2/401 885 GP314GPH
3]4 GPH/525.GPH 80 ' ; 28 1. 5,",x 15.5"
' .1.5" Union
120VAC50/60Hz
62130A17,100
Gal.
960 Gal.
2/65 3,420 GPH/5,711 GPH
.: , 'S70 GPH/952 GPH 130 50_ ':.
71.5' x 15.5 1:5" Uriion,
.120VAC 50/60Hz
Indicates popular models Also Available with Quartz Sleeve Wipers
All models Include Adapter Fittings
5tef'imev
5°" Diameter LI' mall �irtc , laf a a�g"r1f nJ "UL. Listed
Models for Large Ornamental Ponds, Water Features, and Exhibit/Research/Aquaculture Applications
Water Flow Rate Water Flow Rate
No. Algae & Bacteria Protozoa UV-C
Model No. Maximum Maximum Lamps 30,000 pWs/cm2 180,000 pWs/cm2 Input Output Dim. Inlet Input
/Watts Pond Size Aquarium Size /Watt Suggested/Maximum Suggested/Maximum Watts Watts (Inches) /Outlet Voltage
(260TGP30 GP,Ri0]: t6 . ;, 8 x 5.75�' manta 120�(AC�50%601.
025089/80 10,800 Gal. 600 Gal. 1/80 2,700 GPH%3,600 GPH.: 450 GPH/600 GPH. ' 80 : 26 ' 43 x 5.75" : '2"Union ':120VAC 50/60Hz.
_ . .:. ;56'.x5.75" :`2":Union 120VAC50/60Hz
025120/120 - . 13,800 Gal. 770 Gal. 1/120 :'3,840 GPH/4,600 GPH. 640 GPH/767 GPH.. '::':'120 .: 36 :
025150/150 19,100 Gal. 1,060 Gal. 1/150 5,040 GPH/6,360 GP.H . ;840 GPHl1,060 GPH 150 47. '70" x 5.75" 2"Union :.:::120VAC 50/60Hz
Indicates popular models Also Available with Quartz Sleeve Wipers Adapter Fittings are not included
MUMS �"St erfifzee
Models for Large Orriafnental Ponds, Water Features, and Exhibit/Research/Aquaculture Applications +-•.�
Water Flow Rate Water Flow Rate..,
No.'s°' Algae & Bacteria Protozoa UV=C Amps
Model No. Maximum Maximum Lamps 30,660pWs/.cm2 180,000 pWs/c- �- " Input Output Dim. Inlet Max Load @
/Watts Pond Size Aquarium Size /Watt Suggested/Maximiit'n,_5gested/Maximum Watts Watts (Inches) /Outlet 120/236 VAC
0250100/100 ' 7,700 Gal. 430 Gal. 2/50. •' 2,040 6G?B/.2;580 t;PH 340 GPP7/430
0250160/160 16,200 Gal. 900 Gal. 2/80 4320 GPH/5,400 GPH ;:.:720 GPH/900 GP.H J 60 52. 54 x.] ] 3 UNon 115/OS
0250240/240 :':,' 21,800 Gal 1,210 Gal. ",^' "2/120. i5,820,GPH/7,260 GPH. , ..;970 GPHL1,210 GPH : 240 70 ;•� 66"x 11" ; ' 3". Uhion :' : "1,15/OS, .
0250800/300 36,000 Gal..ti•.:2;000 Gal, 2/150 9,600 GPH/12,060 GPH 1,600 GPH/2,000 GPH 300 110 °80°-x;!, ° .:3".Union "1.85/0.85
,..
Input Voltage on all Mo 19` 1 0/230VAC 50180Hz
Water Floyy Rlffes are based on: 90% UV Transmissibility
Suggested = UV Lamp @ 80% efficiency (after 9,000 hours of continuous operation) Aquarium & Pond Sizing is based on:
"" Maximum = UV Lamp Power @ 100% efficiency (new condition) Maximum Aquarium = single pass/1 hour @ "Maximum" flow rate for Protozoa
Maximum Pond = single pass13 hours @ *Maximum" flow rate for Algae & Bacteda... �:::,;r::.::- '
111
15 ,Ar1NDv emperr�ragr taitr � � rim

ti n
OPERATING AND, SERVICE°,INSTR•,U°
ITE
i
w �
r
`f.
t ti •
e fe � • �.r.:..
i
. a
'•f
IT.
1
Ant —
NSA
4 ,l Sq,§MARTUV

OPERATING AND SERVICE INSTRUCTIONS
Congratulations on the purchase of your new SMART UV, we
want you to be safe and successful with our equipment so please,
read our instructions prior to installing and operating this equipment
Section One: SAFETY RULES -FOR ALL SMART UV MODELS - pg. 1- 2
Section Two: UV STERILIZATION FEATURES AND SPECIFICATIONS - pg. 2 - 5
Section Three: WHAT IS ULTRAVIOLET STERILIZATION- pg. 6
Section Dine: ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS - pg. 15 - 16
Section Ten: UV LAMP INSTALLATION- pg. 16 - 17
Section Eleven: QUARTZ SLEEVE WIPERS - pg. 17 - 19
Section Twelve: SMART UV INSTALLATION/OPERATION - pg. 20 - 25
Section Thirteen: SMART UV WINTERIZING - pg. 26
Section Fourteen: SMART UV MAINTENANCE -.pg. 26 - 27
Section Fifteen: SMART UV REPLACEMENT PARTS -.pg. 28 - 31
Section Sixteen: TROUBLESHOOTING - pg. 32
Section Seventeen: CONTACT INFO - pg. 32
Warranty - pg. 33
Other Emperor Aquatics, Inc. Products - pg. 34 - 35
For pond calculating measurements and essential water quality parameters please
visit us at: www.emperoraquatics.com

I �,
I
_`
r .. _ � ,.
.. _ ..
.. .
i

Section .One:. SAFETY .RULES` R11t, ALL 8MAR7° UV MQ,DE,LS
IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE READ PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION AND OPERATION
WARNING TO GUARD AGAINST INJURY, BASIC SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
SHOULD BE OBSERVE®, INCLUDING; THE FOLLOWING:
Water and e�ectrlcaty can be a dan emus combination.
J He0p us ensure your Safety
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL SAFETY INSTRUC T MNS.
DANGER: WARNING -Ultraviolet light is damaging to your eyes and skin!
Do not handle or stare at an operating UV lamp. Note that.the UV light rays are
- invisible to the human eye and precautions should be taken to prevent UV energy
from entering the eyes.
IMPORTANT. READ AND OBSERVE ALL IMPORTANT NOTICES AND LABELS
_ ON THE UNIT: .
---. IMPORTANT: For Your Safety - The quartz sleeve and or the UV lamp in this
_ product may have been broken or damaged during transit! It is therefore
ESSENTIAL that the unit be CAREFULLY INSPECTED BEFORE CONNECTING
TO ELECTRIC POWER (See Section Five)
WARNING: Do NOT exceed 20 PSI (Pounds Per Square Inch)
DANGER: To avoid possible electric shock, special care should be taken since
water is employed in the use of this aquarium and pond equipment. For each of
the following situations, do not attempt repairs yourself. Call EMPEROR
AQUATICS, Inc. customer service department at 610-970-0440 Ext. 0 for
services or discard the appliance....:
DANGER: If the unit falls into. the water, DO NOT REACH FOR ITI First unplug
it and then retrieve it. If the internal electrical components of the unit get wet,
_ unplug the unit. immediately.
DANGER:' If the unit shows any sign of water leakage., immediately unplug it from
the power source.
IMPORTANT. Carefully examine the unit after installation. It should not be
plugged in if there is water on any part not intended to be wet.
DANGER: Do not operate this unit if it has a damaged cord or plug, if it is mal-
functioning, or if it has been dropped or damaged in any manner.
1

IMPORTANT. Close supervision is necessary when any applianceis used by or
near children, and our equipment is no exception.
IMPORTANT: Always unplug the unit from an electrical outlet when not in use,
before servicing, cleaning or removing parts. Never yank the cord to pull the plug
from the outlet. Grasp the plug and pull to disconnect.
IMPORTANT. SMART UVs are designed for low-pressure water applications with
or without aquatic livestock. DO NOT use the EMPEROR AQUATICS, Inc.
SMART UV for any application other than its intended use. The use of
attachments not recommended. or sold by Emperor Aquatics Inc. may
cause unsafe conditions and possibly void any warranty.
IMPORTANT: This unit must be wired in conjunction with a properly
grounded, ground fault interrupter circuit (GFI).
Only (3) three wire. grounded cables suitable for outdoor use should be used to
connect this unit. If joining cables for outdoor use, a suitable watertight cable
connector must be used. If an extension cord is necessary, a cord with a proper
rating should be used. A cord rated for less amperes or watts than the
appliance's rating may overheat. Care should be taken to arrange the cord so that
it will not be tripped over or pulled. (If in doubt consult a qualified electrician)
._, • • ' A • A ' • i ' A •
Our GPH T 5 and T 6 low pressure mercury vapor germicidal lamps, convert
approximately 40% of their electrical input watts into UV C output watts within the
germicidal action spectrum (meaning 40% of electricity used is converted into use-
ful germicidal UV light), the highest UV C output conversion among all UV lamps.
SMART UV FEATURES
UL listed for indoor and outdoor use, fresh and salt water use.
• Long lasting GPH/T5 and GPH/T6 UV lamps (9,000 hours to 80% efficiency).
j o Protective Quartz Sleeve (maximizes UV lamp output and,safety)
o Watertight Design
• Easy-to=Remove Power Assembly
• Remote Power Supply
• UV Resistant High Density ):
Plastic UV Housing
(Lifetime warranty against UV degradation)
• Utilizes the UV lamp to its maximum potential
MART:UV
(maximum UV exposure) .Specifications :Charts:;::':
Non -UV Transmitting Clear Lamp Viewing Ports .(See:pages
2

SMART. High -Output UV Sterilizer Models
Model No.
/Watts
.0205t1/' _ .
Maximum
Pond Size
Maximum
Aquarium Size
5 9QD Gal.
StQ Gal. .
,025080180 ...
10,800.Gal.
900 Gal.
.:025120112'0' . '.
13,800 Gal.
1,200 Gal.
025 5*0/150 : ,
19,000 Gal.
1,600 Gal.
025iD50-l)l!/SO
5,900 Gal.
500 Gal.
Cn
025080-W/80
10,800 Gal.
900 Gal.
025120-W/120
:13,800 Gal.
1,200 Gal.
0251504AY150
19,000 Gal.
1,600 Gal.
Water Flow Rate
Water Flow Rate
No.
Algae & Bacteria
Protozoa
UV-C
Lamps
30,000 PWs/cm2
90,000 µ1Ns/cW
Input
Output
Dim.
Inlet
Input
IWattt
Suggested/Maximum
Suggested/Maximum
Watts
Watts
(inches)
/Outlet
Voltage
1 59
1,561 GPF& 9,98- -0 GPI:c1
544=-P.l�ir7t2 i GPH
d
28' , 5.75"
. 2"` LJFle
12t V 4C 5 f,6t}�9z
1180.
:.
:2;700 GPf-1/3;600.{ PH
.900 GPH/1,20Q GPH
80
26 :
43" x 5_?5"
::2" Unloti
t 201/AC 50060Hz
1%120
::3;840 GPH14,600:6PH
11,260 GP1;5G�
xH:5.75"
.!2!"Union-
120VAt50/60Hz
.1/150'
5 040 GPH/6;3:60:GP€{
.1,680"GPH%2 100 GPH
. 150
:. 47 ...70"
x'5.75"
- " Uhian
3 ZOVPiC 50/6pHz
1/50
1,560 GPH71,980 GPH
540 GPH/720 GPH
50
16
28" x 5.75"
2" Union
120VAC 50/60Hz
1 /80
2,700 GPH/3,600 GPH
900 GPH11,200 GPH
80
26
43" x 5.75"
2" Union
120VAC 50/60Hz
1/120
3,840 GPH/4,600 GPH
1,260 GPH/1,560 GPH
120
36
56" x 5.75"
2" Union
120VAC 50/6OHz
1/150
5,040 GPH/6,360 GPH
1,680 GPH/2,100 GPH
150
47
70" x 5.75"
2" Union
120VAC 50160Hz
WARNING: Do NOT exceed 20 PSI -(Pounds Per Square Inch)
Note: PVC Adapter Kits not included (but available separately)
"Suggested" Water Flow Rates are based on UV Lamp End of Useful Lamp Life, 9,000 hrs. @ 80% output. Maximum Water Flow Rates
are based on New Lamp Condition. All -water flow rates incorporate a 90% UV transmittance factor, considering "Green Water" conditions.

. EMPEROR AQUATICS, INC.
WWRT HO UV STERUL HERS E.'KPLODED PARTS VIEW DIAGRAM
FOR MODEL Vs 0ff,'O 025080, 0251,20, & 025150 UV STERILIZERS &
5 O
FOR MODEL Vs 02-W, 025080-W, 025120-W, & 025150-W UV STERILIZERS
18-►'�pl
17
1. UV Lamp
2. 4-Pin Lamp Connector
3. Black Power Supply Jamb Nut
4. Gray Power Supply Adapter
5. Power Supply Cord .
6. Power Supply Module Assembly
7. Black Retaining Nut
8. Power Supply Gasket
9. Clear Quartz Sleeve Retaining Module
10. O-Ring for Clear Quartz Sleeve
Retaining Module
11. Quartz Sleeve O-Ring
12. Quartz Sleeve Gasket
J 10 ("
_
13 ;-124 9 8 t:.i
13. White Quartz Sleeve GaskettO-Ring
Retaining Nut
14. Quartz Sleeve
15. UV Sterilizer Housing
16. Water Inlet/Outlet Union O-Ring
17. Water Inlet/Outlet Union Socket Half
18. Water Inlet/Outlet Union Retaining Nut
19. Quartz Sleeve Wiper Module (w/ wiper only)
20. C-Clips (w/ wiper only)
21. Quartz Sleeve Wiper Rod (w/ wiper only)
22. Wiper Rod Handle Stop Nut (wl wiper only)
23. Wiper Rod Handle (w/ wiper only)
IN
0.
it
E,
SMART Ho UV UV Lamp
Quartz Sleeve
Pcwer SUpply
Lamp Connector Gasket Service
Watts/Model No. Part No.
Part No.
Part No.
Part No. , Kit Part No.
80 Watt/025080 20080 20340 20105/202120.1
20077 20375
120 Watt/025120 200120 .203120 20105/202120-1
20077 20375
150 Watt/025150 200150 20365 202150-1
20077 20375
NOTE. Clear Quartz Sleeve Retaining madule..20603, White QvartzSlecve Retaining Nut a2007t? bath fit all
5,4trIRTUV Ste»firer tr octets as tvel! os n8 StSARrfJO t1SrStciilizers.
31

s r
'} a:p
HYDRAULIC
A handy ii-efeirence on the subject of hydranl es,
and stemma
Edited by
Co C. Heald
Eighteenth Edition
` bird Pifilting
Price
$30.00
1119ersoll-presser Pumps
Liberty C®rimer, NJ 07938
Visit rnu• website is wwwAlpump.com
i

ITT
APPLICATIONS
Specially'designed for the following uses:
• Basement draining
• Water transfer
• Dewatering
SPECIFICATIONS
• Discharge size: 11/2" NPT.
• Capacities: to 57 GPM:
• Maximum head: 34 feet-TDH.
• Max. solids: W spherical
• Temperature: 104°F (40°C) maximum liquid
temperature.
• Maximum pump submergence is 10 ft. for LSP03;
16 ft. for LSP07.
MOTOR
• Single phase, 3450 RPM, 60 Hz
• LSP03,'/3 HP, 115 V, 2.9 maximum amps.
• LSP07, 3/4 HP 115 V (7.1 amps) or 230 V (3.5 amps).
• Built-in thermal overload protection with automatic
reset.
• Permanent -split -capacitor type.
MODEL INFORMATION
GOULDS PUMPS
Wastewater
• Class' B insulation.
• Stainless steel shaft.
• Airfilled design.
• Power cord length: LSP03; 10 feet standard, 20 feet
optional, LSP07; 20 feet.
FLOAT SWITCH OPTIONS_
■ Models are available with a float switch. Several op-
tiohs for automatic operation.
■ "AV" models are supplied with a vertical float switch.
■ "A' models are supplied with a built in float switch.'
0 "AT",models are supplied with"a piggy -back replace-
able float switch.
AGENCY LISTING
Canadian Standards Association
File #LR114251
us
1 1� underwriters Laboratories
V File #83318
Goulds Pumps is ISO 9601 Registered.
Order No.
HP
Volts
Amps
Minimum
Circuit
Breaker.
Phase
Switch Stle
y
Cord
Length
.Discharge
onnecton
Ci
Min.
M.
On
Level
`Min.
Off
Level'
Minimum
Basin
Diameter
Maximum
Solids
. Size
Shipping
Weight
Ibs/k
LSP0311
1/3
115
2.9
10
1
Plug / No Switch
10,
11/2"
Manual
Manual
T,
3/e°
11 5'
LSP0311A
Built -In Wide Angle=
11"
, 5"
12"
LSP0311AT
Piggyback Wide Angle
11"
5"
12" _
LSP0311AV
LSP0311 F
Piggyback Vertical
8.5"
2"
12"
Plug / No Switch
20'
Manual
Manual
9"
LSP0311AF
Built -'In Wide An le
11"
5" "
12"
LSP0311ATF
Piggyback Wide Angle
11"
5°
12"
LSP0711 F
a/a
115
7.1
10
1
Plug / No Switch
20'
Vff
Manual
Manual
9" .
1/8"
15 / 6.8
LSP0711AF
Built-in Wide Angle
12.5"
6.5"
1 12"
LSP0711ATF
LSP0712F
Piggyback Wide Angle
12.5"
6.5"
12"
230
t
3.5
I
Plug / No Switch
Manual
Manual
9"
LSP0712AF
Built -In Wide Angle
12.5"
6.5"
12"
LSP0712ATF
Piggyback wide Angle
12.5".
6.5"
12"
2

I It 0

'& -ITT
FEET
35
30
25
20
15
0
10
5
n
GOULDS PUMPS
Wastewater
MODEL: LSP03, LSP07
i—-�
_ ± _
SIZE' 1/8" SOLIDS MAX.
RPM: 3450
HP: 1/3 and 3/4
ASP07-- —��
[_LS,P03
jj
0 10 20 30 40
CAPACITY
COMPONENTS
Item No.
Description
1
Casing
2
Impeller
3
Suction strainer
4
Shaft seal with cover
5
Motor
6
Ball Bearing
7
Capacitor
8
0-ring
3
7
8
6
5
6
4
1
2
3
50 GPM

Wastewater
DIMENSIONS
(All dimensions are in inches and weights in lbs. Do not use for construction purposes.)
F
H
LSP03
9'/a
75/a
LSP07
11'/a
91/a
LSP03AV
9a/a
75/a
POWER CORD:
16/3 SJTW WITH THREE PR
GROUNDING PLUG
6'/a" DIA.
2IIli,
f
1'k" NPT
DISCHARGE
F I I
I H
[qGOULDS PUMPS
Goulds Pumps and the ITT Engineered Blocks Symbol are
registered trademarks and tradenames of ITT Corporation.
SPECIFICATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
BLSP03 August, 2006
© 2006 ITT Corporation
Engineered for life

Water and Wastewater Availability-2040 MonterosaRoad, PIN: 55... mailbox:///C:%Users/Owner/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Pro..
Subject: Water and Wastewater Availability-2040 Monterosa Road, PIN: 5525-09-2467, Cabarrus
County
From: "Derek Slocum" <[e-mail]>
Date: 1/24/201411:00 AM
To: <[e-mail]>
Mr. Lash,
Per your request; the above. parcel of land currently does not have access to the Town. of Harrisburg water and'
wastewater services. The nearest water and wastewater infrastructure is several miles away.
Thank you.
Derek Slocum
Town Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]
-No virus found. in this message.
Checked by AVG www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3681/7030 - Release Date: 01/24/14

RE: Watershed Classification for Bridges Property mailbox:///C:/Users/Owner/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Pro...
Subject: RE: Watershed Classification for Bridges, Property
From: "Weaver, Adriene" <adriene.weaver@.ncdenr.gov>
Date: 1/24/201412:32 PM .
To: "Michael Lash, PE." <mikel@lash engineering.corn>
Mike -
The stream next to the lot shown on the topo map you provided me is draining to Reedy Creek which is
classified "C" and therefore it .carries the same classification.
Regards,
Adriene
-i From: Michael Lash, PE.[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January:23, 2014 2:13 PM
To: Weaver, Adriene
Subject: Watershed Classification for Bridges Property
Adriene,.
I need a water classification for a lot near Midland, NC. Please see attached to view the necessary
documents.
Here is the Northing and Easting.
_ Latitude 35' 16.60" N
Longitude 80' 36.4' 0'.' W
Thanks,
Mike
Lool1 Eriomocriri.cg, Inc.
' .. Michael Lash, fair.
704-047 3031
[e-mail]
No virus found in this message. .
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3681/7030 - Release Date: 01/24/14
bf 1 1 /25 /2014 2:35 PM

Tim Barbee
Driller Service, Inc. — Hickory
1800 Highland Ave
NE Hickory, NC 28601
March 3, 2009
Dear Mr. Barbee:
I am writing this letter to inform you.that Michael Lash, P.E of Lash Engineering, Inc is
certified to design treatment and disposal systems using the SeptiTech, LLC line of
pretreatment processors.
Regards,
Joshua Cobb, P.E.
Design Engineer
70 Commercial Street, Suite 3
Lewiston, Me 04240
[phone]

X*NOTE-SQUARE
ACCESS FOR
CONCRETE RISER OR
OPTIONAL PLASTIC 107'
20' ROUND RISER (�
CAST -IN I 102'
r
2 ' 4' 21,
VENT
55' 50' 17' 15'
3' OR 4'
L15'OUTLET BOOTS
-� ON OUTLET END
ONLY
TOP VIEW
-KNOTE, ALL MEASUREMENTS ON TOP
VIEW ARE NO BOOTS ON TO WIDEST DIMENSIONS
SIDE INLETS,
USE CONCRETE
KNOCKOUTS
105'
100'
65'
INLET
}� O 9, AI+SPACE
I VENT-
54b'
TO BOTTOM 67'
OF 3' INLET '
54'
TO BOTTOM
OF 4INLET'
SIDE VIEW
THROUGH
4'
= 31'
LIQUID LEVEI
— 33'
2'
50'
7-7777-7� 71 �j4
52' TO BOTTOM OF 4' OUTLET
52 1/2' TO BOTTOM OF 3' OUTLET
OUTLET
SHOAF PRECAST SEPTIC INC.
MODEL: MS IOW STB
NON TRAFFIC
1 Opp Gallon Septic Tank
4130 WEST US HWY 64
LEXINGTON, NC 27295
PHONE <336) 787-5826
FAX [phone]
W WW.SHOAFPRECAST.COM
SHOAF-1000 NON TRAFFIC RATED
STB-760 NON TRAFFIC
LIQUID CAPACITY-1039 US GALLONS/9 AIRSPACE
TANK HEIGHT-66'
BOTTOM OF TANK TO CENTER OF INLET-56'
BOTTOM OF TANK TO CENTER OF OUTLET-54' .
LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO-2 TO i
SIZE OF INLET & OUTLET-3' OR 4' PIPE
TYPE OF INLET & OUTLET-POLYLOCK OR -EQUAL (MEETS ASTM C-923)
CONCRETE PSI-40001 TANK WEIGHT-8,500 LBS.
REINFORCING PER STATE CODE
WwNOTE - TEE
NOT SUPPLIED
SCALE - N.T.S.
f-•--17'-i
3�-
4'
66' 59'
FLOW
THROUGH
END VIEW
'
� 53-
' -
5S' -
STATE
APPROVAL #
SHOAF-1000
STB-760
V BUTYL RUBBER
MASTIC SEALANT
"--CONTINUOUS IN
JOINT

TOPOi map printed on 01/18/14 from "Untitled.tpo"
ou-.3o.uuu vv 80037. 0W W 80036.000' W WGS84 80035.000' W
- / % i �j %�i�' r' C (\ �� � • .iT?Li - r.l r � �\��;�: •i 1�. `' U �---Yl
�����,%r�1-� oO\��—'1,r \- _ �`t�� ,1 ,���.\ .'Z •,�Ls�� 1YI �- %�� �-�
-: s A. L - / i -\.. , • I � of �� � , '\ - . „` _ /I
_ •I • eM ` 'I. i • � "o` ,� I �N �� � t _ / ��' � \ ii ✓-'�' � ' 7�! 1 � ; � T . ,
O {f •r — _�139 563
r .y
Mom'/,1'sf 'z �/ �� �✓ \_.�',�. �Q (�1% /�/.5��l�\ y�l
)tip
•; � / � ,i �\ � � � - w � � I //'F2eman Rill •, (� \_ ©���
•-�'�. °°dam ;, "11� I `�y� •�',�'
�� �C _'1 1 1111 I <<�g�a ~V 'y / - `/� Jr\\-•� rr�.l �
V�n Q��'1� �� -✓l l
��' ��✓ �� � a - % l•
Sto,e'rhmwor.�
o��� �) tuber"Ftid d• �� �� { % i�fl l•\'< `E_- ��
CD
Sal-marD ( �,�i-•\_- ���
Ln
r
~\J
<�--5 r 1� aM _Cedar Cove Dr _� � i�~�. Rd- _ '\\�''� r /�� � J� r`- � �� �•�.
to� % !?—�:1 j�• !j J it - �/ ;4,5y` ) r�yoi
/x __._{J�— •�,1
e
I
�� .. ��� � i 6� • _ M•B ! l � 'f1 �, \ '�a � lam`+' � �-1��� o\\ '
77IQ
CD
CD N
,�., �- 4' c:B - I - � .`. I '`\ � • i •:i -III � �, (r 1 i„ -
Ln
L
Map created with ©2007�NaGonal�Geographic;�0?005 T_ele Atlas; Rel 8/2l)O5. ,_r,�' a �,,.� i-B ; --� • 4�elle Home n•� r� ,;y�`, =•
80°38.000' W 80°37.000' W 80°36.000' W WGS84 80°35.000' W
0 1
NATIONAL -- M,IES
u,OUO U ,000 ZJ19�30D0 00005000
GEOGRAPHIC , _ .5 0 WMETEAS FEE[ 1
-- 0 NV HS 1000
i nay G
PIN TN
71/20
01/18/14

it
Ingersoll-®iressew Pumps Cameron Hydraulic Data
;I
Friction of Water (Continued)
Friction Losses in Pipe Fittings
l
Resistance coefficient K use in formula hf = K V. I
0
G
O
O
O
O
IO
N
N
ci
O
N
O
M
O
O
N
O
N
O
O
m
M
O
O
O
p
N
P
O
N
O
N
O
d
aJ
Q
a)
O
O
N
O
<
O
C1°9
O
N
O
N
O
M
O
IO
O
In
O
N
O
N
O
N
Ct
m
N
�
m
tN'l
N
P
of
C I
N
E
O
Z
N
m
o
n
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
O
O
<OG
O
q
O
(7
O
O
o'
O
r
NO
rn
O
O
O
O
O
N
A
O
Q
O
Q
O
O
Q
O
a)
O
Q
N
_
aJ
O
Q
O
Q
O
0
v
N of
y
iL
F Ea
-i. ..
>.
O
o
c;
r
m
i
>
a
>
a
>
a
v
Cn
rn l
Friction —Water -Pipe Fittings
Friction of Water (Continued)
Friction Losses in Pipe Fittings
Resistance coefficient K use in formula h, = K Vt
N
A
N
P
N
N
Oi
<
P
I�
I�
fOp
O
O
90
r
O
M
IO
Q
N
A
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
t0
m
11
a1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
G
O
N
(D
'
M
U0J)
O
O
m
N
.11co-n
M
IN
M
1°
NN
�
•Q
Q°yAC
mNamtQN0I
OpIANOOAOOO°j
O
mOOoNOrPOO
aMOOoOMOPMN!
70tOOQOON)
MO0QaoMQO)
QUCAO0NMNl
tOrO0m0
aON0OAOOMDI
t0
AOto�OMaIO°OI
QOaO,ONC-)
aGtQPQOOGOMI0°O)O
tpr^OONOAOWONGP0I
OZ
O>
OONANo�NOOMOl
yJ
MOOMOPMONO
NN
N
M
v
2
O
Am
NQ
P�
aN1OAM(OOOON�DAO
ONpAO0O0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�O
O
O
r
Q
N
P
N
N
M
N
16
m
m
N
O
O
O
r
M
O
N
O
r
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
+-
0
0
O
O
a
O
O
r
Q
(?
Q
CD
fO
N
t7
M i
M
a)
Ia
O
N
A
Q
N
O
0
m
CM]
11°j
m
M
O
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
O
G
O
^
M
!D
Q�
a)
Q
f0
N
m
N
N-
M
t7
N-
a)
w
m
A
A
M
A-
M
O
I°
r
M
O
O
to
a1
M
m
Iq
N
m
O
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
r
O
O
O
O
C
q
O
r
N
o
M
0
0
0
o
In
M
o
a�
Ia
-qO�
o
q
M r
24 N
o
O
0
r
0
N
_m
M
M
O
o
O
o
IO
•
O
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
O
r
r
0
6
O
O
O
r
_
m
uQi
m
uQi•
m
m
m
vIqw
rn
M
r
Q
N
In
o
0
�y
N
v
b
0
tNO.
r
N
M
M
M
P
P
IO
r
N
Q
t0
°
L
°
�
r
N
M
P
IO
m
0�
T
M
O
O
C
T�
�
�`
II
II'
II
II
II
II
II
u
A
11
u
N
II
S
O
M
49
P
O
to
in
A
p
rn
�
U
V
D-_R
V
V
a
,�
II
II
a
II
II
9
d
L
L
N
v
a
d
m
�
fy
m
N
C 3
o
m
mai
cS-11Z
. ^,.
;;�� 3-113
L

N.
a
O
— --.... ............ _......
_-__-...... .
m m m m
N N N m
=-.,.r
rre=N
NOt7 Ci R.
CIII Ofph
IA 001�t7
CSN
' m
m
r
^O
N N N
N N.OiN
vw
aimO
b m Aol m 0
_m
m
a
^
C
00000
C!
NNl7�
hN(hp
Om�
M•m
ah Nora
ILcqNn
mfhON't
OA?On
(b0 c'q N!2tD.
r rNN
MCiOOb
D)wc
r�w.
mOmAm
Uy
TONCJ I7<7
mhmrNNN
Nh
LOol
Nh NfO
Lq m9
b mmmaul
uNlpVr yrNN-
.
NCI V'?I(i
mo'rfri_ mnl�
I��.-lrO Ori QI
OOONM
bm
AN OirN
Lq r. m7NO,Nmo
m-Nwl
NNNNN
O
m r ++
COI r b b m
m O b o r
A A
.
m
Omm`
mono
OOO�T
eh-�Ncii
OOn�rN
bIQ+TN�.'
m�Cnr
bmNlb�IN
r
U
='-ter
r
rrNN,
Nt�i mmi
c mwl
rr{Orm
bQNbO
b.OV'ai
ONOrm
N
m
v
wo-m r-•
r N N N
COI IArA
N N Q b b
I.•
m
T
m
"
C
O N
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
N m m N N
W N m m
N?<,b
n O h b Y
tDn�mm
N r r to
Oe-N
>LNNNNN
R1�
.--p•r r�
mNmmm
NQQbm
N�m•YO
mmONT
O
m
r r
N
�
T
JmU
almll
bi�mON
abf�rQ
m-LOmN
YJm NtOm
q1":q
rl
QmA IO
il tq N7O
mr, Vq
m1�RN0
y
r
rNN
w6mmR
RCm uj
mtOhAA
ww..
.-N[gV0
b10^m.-
c.OmmO
>
r r r
N
NNN N
O
C
m m�
m0 a0
oNa
m m r
POr
pN oNm
Q Arm m
rNNN
omoo
m m N A N
QIn (�m0
� h m A m.
t?bl.m
b r A N
NQAmN
Q b m 0
nmrmm
m b m
mAONb
'It
L
rrr
NNNNtO
CJn V'st V1
wN.oer-
OmNh
my Oi 4
b1.. N07
ID 01(lOm
N
m
r t
NC]t9QQ
�
a
m
-Ua
OOm �.�--N
N0000
ONOONi tO�l
mNnOA
RNNmr
C
p0,;=
00000
00000
rN
"mmo�
N(717QR
ul b mhA
mmmN
mmbmm
bmNlOm
RrOV:O
NmOmh
mmm
•
i�
�'C
r
rNNN
C)N V'Ob
hmmN{m
fOhmOr
la
o
�
�
T
�
mU
Onm
m<OmN
?mDmr
m�TONb
NQmmN
tam.-Mb
bmNbm
'mrC7 �0
t�mrOm
mONNN
;gym
^rrN
NNNNN
Cm.--'f
VaRbm
AOVAO
bl6wA
mt�O mIO
Ar-mmm
<NOmm
O.-"Nn
YNOmN
'vmwt
mER rr t7
ON?tnA
O,
N NNN N
O N m m C
80 O O O
N< m m A
O O O O O
m m O N 0'
O o 0 0 o
b m O N Q
O o o o 0
b m O N V
O O O O pp
m m O N a
O O O O O
O O O O O
0 0 o 0 o
O O O O O
LL3 m a E
^
N N N
N NNN N
N m Q Q v
m m O b O
v Q b w t
N O b O b
b A A m m
O b 0 0 0
m m O r N
0 0 o 0 0
N Q^ b A
W
^
r
d
G)
o
m
a
m
r
a
,
p U O
_m
C 00
El-
C m U
C '�F
U N N
m m m
EL
O.. m
CIO
acn
mm�
�mn
C C
O m
Oam
-ca
mV-
m U
m 0
v E
C.0 O'
c Emb
m O O N
N Em
'N -0 mQG
E N m
ma
A m n m m
'm E E m
m' EEo-
T C U C
m"-
� m N
U L N m m
GI �
E L
C m
o C O
o mUm�O
C O�ya
O o<��
m
Z mjm
r
Z 0 nN
Wm=
QW�
2agQ
mbNr O'
m9Nbb
QQmm
On!P
v
O
DONHmN
DO[00
ONON
6.0
VV�mm
n0 CiQObrmN
=m-Or•
4NNNM
64 Tli O
--rr
rrN
NNNNN
QQbmA
mmrrr
1 ''-a
W- m
nhomA
O r N O'1p
mobv
m r b m N
h�q c)nb
m r m r A
mrmNn
CI O m v m
n)n in ho
O N Q m m
vomAh
V m m N
mNhvr
b m N m m
h�mah
m m 0
vol6)ne
>0.
00000
0.. . . .
NN R{?a
LQDq q
rr.-
r
NNNNN
NNQVb
IDhm-�-
rr--
T�.,
mvmtgA
Nh ^frDO
IOm^m(�
m ATO
mm hm
10 'PN NN
Omm
vmm 10
mmmo
ml�no
Avrmb
aminNo
nv,^��p
N-mbo
'4
CTD

(� t-k- -r -
Mkt
U�
7 Aa
TINto
16k 4
I M142M65'
I N

• 11 4
<&.ITT
Goulds Pumps
LSP0.3/LSP07 ��m;P�m';,
LSP03AT
LSP03AV
LSP07
IqGOULDS PUMPS
Goulds Pumps is a brand of ITT
Residential and Commercial Water.
www.goulds.com
Engineered for life
Wastewater
F'E�1TUR+E�5
■ Corrosion -resistant construction.
■ Stainless Steel motor casing and fasteners.
Glass -filled thermoplastic impeller and
casing.
• Upper and lower heavy duty ball bearing
.construction.
■ Motor is permanently lubricated for
extended service life and is powered
for continuous operation. All ratings are
within the working limits of the motor.
■ Hard coated 400 series stainless steel
shaft for improved corrosion resistance.
■ Float switch is adjustable for various
liquid levels. Easily.removed for direct
pump operation or switch replacement.
■ Complete unit is lightweight, portable
and easy to service.
0 Available in manual and automatic ver-
sions. See next page for specific order
numbers.
■ A double labyrinth lip seal system pro-
tects the motor. It consists of three lip
seals and a U: ring in addition to an im-
peller counterblade system which keeps
solid particles away from the seal unit.

,, .
,'
,i k

1
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary.
�vr�e
May 6, 2014 DMS'tONI Cr VV T __R QUnLi T Y
Daniel Bridges, Owner MAY 13 20114
5009 Silabot Ave.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28205 lM00'?EG 1'
Subject: Certificate of Coverage (COC) NCG551614
Under General Permit NCG550000
for Single Family Residence
2040 Monterosa Road
Concord, North Carolina 28025
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Bridges:
General Permit Coverage. In accordance with your application for discharge, the Division of
Water Resources (DWR) herewith forwards the subject Certificate of Coverage (COC) to discharge under the
subject state-NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina
General Statue 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US
Environmental Protection agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended). Your permit package
includes:
11 A copy of the Certificate of Coverage for your treatment facility
13 A copy of General Wastewater Discharge Permit NCG550000
13 A copy of a Technical Bulletin for General Wastewater Discharge Permit NCG550000
o A copy of the approved drawings, signed April 14, 2014.
11 Engineer's. Certification form (to be completed and returned to DWR).
DWR understands from your authorized consultant, Lash Engineering, Inc. of Matthews, NC that local soils,
both on and offsite, exhibit poor percolation characteristics rendering them unsuitable for a subsurface
discharge wastewater treatment system. We further understand that connecting to the nearest municipal sewer
service is cost prohibitive at a distance of 1.2 miles. We concur therefore that discharge to surface waters. of the
State is the most viable discharge alternative.
In accord with existing regulations, you have proposed to discharge 480 gallons per day (gpd) from a four (4)
bedroom single family residence (120 gpd per bedroom). Please note that compliance under this COC restricts
discharge to 100% domestic flow, not to exceed 1,000 gpd. This discharge must meet all surface water -quality
standards, and you must comply with DWR's operation and maintenance requirements.
Operation and Maintenance. The Permittee is responsible to maintain all components in the approved
treatment system. Compliance includes following manufacturer's guidelines, conducting and documenting
inspections, establishing sources for OEM spare parts and supplies, making necessary repairs, and documenting
said maintenance for the duration of the permit.
Upon DWR's request, the Permittee must provide records and demonstrate efforts to maintain the approved
system. The Division recommends that the Permittee solicit manufacture -certified training, or employ a
1617 Mail Service Center,. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] Internet: Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

qualified contractor or service to regularly inspect and maintain the treatment system.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this general permit are
unacceptable, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application..
Unless such demand is made, the certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
This COC is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water Resources. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the COC. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to
obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Resources or permits required by the
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local
governmental permit that may be required.
This system is proposed to discharge to an unnamed tributary (UT) of Reedy Creek surface waters classified as
Class C.
Authorization to Construct (ATC) Permit. According to the permit application and the attached approved
plans and specifications, DWR hereby authorizes installation- of-
• influent gravity drain line
• septic tank [1,000 gallons] with effluent filter,
• Septitech Unit M400D-UV FRALO with
dosing tank [1,000 gallon] control panel,
• UV disinfection [single bulb],
• outfall rip -rap erosion control.
All elbow piping must conform to the long -sweeping type. All cleanouts must be housed in meter boxes below
grade. This treatment system shall be located at least 10 feet away from a dwelling, at least 100.feet.,from any
water -supply well either on- or off -site. The system shall also be located and constructed above any applicable
100-year flood line; 50-ft setback from property line.
This ATC permit is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph 2 of NPDES General Permit NCG550000, and
is subject to revocation unless wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions
and limitations specified in this General Permit. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily,
including creating nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action as may be required
by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater treatment(s) or disposal
facilities. Failure to abide by the requirements of this A to C permit may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the Division of Water Resources in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The Permittee or responsible Engineer shall notify DWR's Raleigh Regional Office (919-791-4200) a minimum
of three (3) working das in advance of operating the installed facilities. This will serve to provide DWR an
opportunity to inspect facilities, as needed. Such notification to the regional office supervisor shall be made
during normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding State holidays.
Upon completing construction and prior to operating this permitted facility, a North Carolina -registered
engineer shall sign and submit to DWR the attached Engineer's Certification form certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, the Certificate of Coverage, this Authorization
to Construct, and the approved plans and specifications.
Compliance with the above shall include a leakage test performed on the existing septic tank, to insure that any
exfiltration occurs at a rate not to exceed twenty (20) gallons per twenty-four (24) hour per 1,000 gallons of
tank capacity. The Engineer's Certification shall serve as proof of compliance with this condition. Mail the
completed Engineer's Certification to:
Page 2 of 5

11M rl
DENR / DWR/ NPDES Program
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
❖ The Permittee shall maintain on site, for the life of the treatment facility, a copy of the approved plans and
specifications.
NPDES Contact. If you have any questions concerning the requirements of this Certificate of Coverage or
Authorization to Construct permit, please contact Derek C. Denard at telephone number 919-807-6307 or email
[e-mail].
111V111QJ 1 >. er, Director
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Attachments: Engineer's Certification form
hc: Central Files
Mooresvine Regional�Qflice; Atfn—.-Michael-Parker--)
!ODES General Permit Files
Cabarrus County DEH
ec: Daniel Bridges [[e-mail]]
Michael Lash, P.E.. [[e-mail]]
Page 3 of 5

[This page intentionally left blank]
Page 4 of 5

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE - NCG551614
Under GENERAL PERMIT NCG550000
TO DISCHARGE DOMESTIC WASTEWATERS FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES
AND OTHER DISCHARGES WITH SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission,
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Daniel Bridges - Owner
is hereby authorized to operate a wastewater treatment facility consisting of septic tank, Septitech Unit
M40OD-UV FRALO, UV disinfection, effluent discharge pipe with outfall rip -rap erosion protection
discharging treated domestic wastewater from a facility located at the
Single -Family Residence
2040 Monterosa Road, Concord 28025
Cabarrus County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary (UT) to Reedy Creek [stream segment
13-17-8], a waterbody currently Classified C within Subbasin 03-07-11 of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III and IV of General Permit NCG550000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 6, 201.4.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 6, 2014.
"ivision or wafer rwsources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 5 of 5

Rocky River Rd
o
•. 4 - ��`" _ • Y�� �� ,• yReedy
-/ �_/ a• `:� •� [flows northeast] 4 �• ��
UT to Reedy Creek
_- �`'�,• h =s (flows north)s
Outfall ; -
��� ( (flows west)_ t
r
9'.. Merrivee Dr
° • „ �� ,.� ft ,- Lower Rocky River Rd a
\T.
Daniel Bridges
Single -Family Residence
2040 Monterosa Road, Concord 28025
Receiving Stream: UT to Reedy Creek Stream Segment:
13-17-8
Stream Class: C Sub -Basin:
03-07-11
Latitude: 35 ° 16' 37" Longitude:
80' 36' 27"
State Grid/USGS Quad: F16SE / Concord SE, NC HUC:
03040105
Drainage Basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
Facility,
Location •Ga .�,,,
Scale 1: 24,000�
General Permit COC NCG551614
North Cabarrus County

1 —Go —ANK S—CVTANK
'vwvvv� EW
SEPTIC TANK 1
1,000 GALLONS
e-21t/y
Va 9/4
ALO W UNT SECTION VIEW
zr°upje'rNm Y°m.,.Xzaam. PROPOSED-SEPTITECH UNIT
M1,.]ro"O,e: M40OD-UV FRALO TANK
1 �..nD. Rr pol
¢ v mm4e�rom 1tl _
PRO SS-SEGl10N
14"
1 2 1/2' CONCRETE BLOCK)
PROPOSED TANK SHALL BE
A FRALO-RMT-1060
(2 COMPARTMENT)
IF Oil-
��1►:tllll!I I;I � � ��Il��r;rp►�
DUSTING 1.000 gat SEPTIC TANK oRlsvn
00� n.vc""mp ivmu,i�
{n°fEc.A�norw iOft
PROPOSED MAOOD-UV SFPTITECH UNIT
SCHEMATIC LAYOUT PLAN (NTS)
i eR (Ivq ooX,m vv.Y u,amb...
r,q vaeve.•a • fo rt r uem
I¢IW
W PST %m Antmw
Control Peaol
w
Is+Ot I/]mow, n��u mvn..nub
ACSOPUmch
u WK,r
Pmmnl ul< aM Ilp.°�
PW,Pn�
Goulds L5PD9
°'�a�m,e�,a-.,.'i°"'
Ilw ww Tw l'IW
�. w�.w
n.. �alsax iom•w+a IDn.l wmn
emd
I /
CUPVE lFNG1N gpOnVETABIE �� CXORO
Lot 8
1 Lot 7 / Lot 6
Smmy Notex
I. Cobmm Cwnly, T. Pmui )SSTY°9-2167
I R4Avd It anG Wiry RWNe q
2 R.I.R6EG"R.1f.0
], Dced I1/IBq Nm pool IT/IT
I
I
I Op 00]W PGWI
A ALL WIAiAS ARE lPN(i) UHIESS 011mIm5E ]paRLL
d ALL �rANLTS Ald MIIID.ViAt mTANE6 UNIESS OaRALL9: NO1FA
4 ARFA aY WOIm]lA1E WNRIrAi4at
1. PRWFAtt 91B.EtT f0 AW VAID d fNNPCUWE FASpId1G RFSiPRI®1�6 d � —
I �2,� W \S OSId'65' W � \
I j
__>(_____`__,
D YIpETT PRWOItt R unT LOGY➢ W A 9YOAL ROW IIALUdI ARU AS
DRWA
I
�
It Its ISOFOF
3 1105 PUT G OP A S1IREEY W AN FIDSML PAPGO. D PAPaGS W W9.
NI-S°�'AL1660 qv. ATpy.l°j INIE aiel Rm4 ¢mbl4 RC T6]9
IL C-hNW Tmo ocp:ed 6wv TAR Y�. and bv¢levd m pW
12 Pombm Wales b Ged b Yob Wm Nv W
ll
A I \
al I' V 1
IV
LO[� I pL 10
\ 0.26 Ac:ca \ ll`VII
Site
VICUMMM-NOTI SGtE
wPP 1. en pep m mO.n m p
Tm1K and AOem A& I4 I I 1I\ I \ SSE 2al3 ACA
DO
{W \ t
SSRS-09 Ma I I I I fAp C OT�410I I Fmnl A Amn }.
0e910, pGW18 i .pm�plyl p t I OPVW. PGO16T
, I
\
'I moo !E BI g IpvE°&Im"I mmpA Ey Ym I \ I ` I I Lot 11
.e PdM�emmt mmn•amp.nZ 1' I \bl t
(]) p�AK B60P[ gGmS N I I "k" \ - 100' Setback
EAOgpY CAII• \ / m P:apve terW.M1
xmw1.800.6324949 I I (ror sPmrNriP �°ly)
OAA¢➢tl1 GUL tTRnDI 0 I °' SemecN hmn Pw med
\ ter wen. (Tw DueeioimnQge)
rmarl and AMv se"tm ImI 1 \I _�
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 6050619It, _P4pW}4 I7OI I I I / \ I� pPd440 THIjE AISNO D]SIINO
ttWAiW tl�v.w smn.A#
{r muw Avmm.e rm,J I I _ \ I MUSM e 1 at uym A. tr rr'mim
L TAN{ To SE pSIAl1ED 6'RCIX PFA STONE so, USE A DoameoD FIT
AW
(F URDI) _ \1
zUsE.AGW WIW/L PeaOAfAlL YAm xo gR44lS.—my mas,
WIPACim. NEED FAI.VAn(W FM W WAtp AT ALL IEHS _ I- ` I /I)
R1
as PiLL d BTHiS YAIEAIE — m — f0I1Li4 $TITD, Res V TAItt, I 1T I \ O O 1•y � / OY 9q3 ipSC nest: n6 OWOHAOS TI \ I
I \
A USE A WW TAYFEF TO AQDEIE Sq.WAIt WIPAGGeR RaM THE W,PACIEp I I I I - \ I G --- -
s. ReMAU. WLPW.�ON Is ®TRAL FOR SOI Ramus,T. I F __ \ _�-__ \ J IIIIIEEP/A—/,�y�__��IIyJ1.0
G BAVJp16E1MEDi 1�6 {LSL W WTEIE OAI]OIIIA'C, DUDE Od.IP1.1GE AWAY fAOY � I I �� 0 � � FIR
I
iAp8A �I I I
J
r
-
-
—
-
-
--
II
;
mperor qua cs, 9 t
.Y�..1'mvu�ti h� �mnm
HOUSING FOR UV LIGHT
�.:T��41Ipp SNM boll late— T°PP NduvUb Lid
T911ip1I1LIHMIpIr — — gefSNST to"m
x�rwy�-mA O d o p ax
Self . i UH
TOPP I d..
FB18x48
..........s ....��.�..�..� +..,..��..., 7"
1. W OAl veep m b. m W h N. MAameld vo Tim.IN UWSOLD
T'Heod .•.
N..cta. W Mt mom b ban Ne Ip w pmYilm p0fm � t, t. d Aq..0 B" SOL D
b. wy emm,d mode m be AguvU® BRICK
wcmmgdO W ban W ldl W b m bO,. a wupb luldbd m EON aide Ydd. Nn .mIL UV Dght
i ine DpAI b b E. mmilaN El Ne rm4Ol pmd 5ladd a fOYn wew N. Cmbd P.
b MR
m wt aR pmm tO Ne miL dOpaA a elpnd tar 6rmemd. mONlmmcs, and 4m ell Uu CONTitACTOfl PUMP
.leuml pmq la d.dimgh lO N. ¢.e4 No mbvclOd .10mn1 h m b 1v ,l ht Ua TO DRILL 2" SUPPORT
nRl I�
T•��
1;
g • O
1 W UgM b m E. ImelM m Ou db:Mge elb of N. Sp°tle Be., Evl m bon mvi vccna HOLES '
Iv Ymlmmn b.m0 W MO-01 h IIDS W Ir Om AuaoYr .IN Itl (�Mj. W t}fl b m FORS 37 �m
Ie NOIdN.IN ml—m' .W.OIWWbdw Peed btmaNle�NW DRAINAGE 6 1g" Goultls LSPO] �
.I ml b. IrnaaN N -,d Gm— m bare NOt aw rw oauaraa
mY

APPROVE®
North Carolina Department of Environmental And
Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Date f7 6 /44 a.V 2Q '0
Survey Natez
L uxm2z WNx Tw Pvvl /Azs-U9-zb1
L E41':10.Wa
.
a O.k xaensN/IBq wav Beck ly/Tt
A ALL [O ixFP] APE LPIx(n UMLSS Ow4AMY NOhU.
a Au os Axcrs Aa[ xfiwAartu msrAx¢s uxt¢s otxorms[ xorta
e. Axu er woswx.Arz rnNPuunax.
(» xwmM mare ama w
z. vcmmtt sm[cr ro Avr vus � t]nox¢AmE cvmmnz x¢ xxoxs e
x w x O NATO PE[pm
I.600.W24949
& L0.lLT NIU'fAIY lOdiED w A �EpAI fION MAZAPD AIdA AS
x[Tmvsm er wa uAP.
xoxm awww.v t uu mna
Y. ll� PUi 6 W C6 A A 98lrFT OF M Of AN FAS➢NG PARRL v PAIt[p5 OF IM1Y0.
IaFSumy bax�B �LL Qo�tSaa It]Ifi BiYf Rm2 Umblf., NC ]B}Il
NoImM1N Twu
- b acm,P'NryiN tam US[S YW. and hmufrt d to P�mx
fz Pofa1b q a v. popoud Fob w6 m tiv.n m w. Playa
Site
�s
�J

GENERAL PERMITS - NEW
NCG 50� 51 53, 5:5)57
CHECK LIST - FOLDER INSERT
QaGt1z� ��c �S '10Uo 6l/Lo /eo'`CIS' t /r
Facility F C it-� `1 00 ✓4 Nc Z.g �2 5
Permit No. �N C U- S5 16 f
Folder Left Side [stapled]:
Rhis Check List
IMS Tracking Slip
NPDES Permit Writer:
D-WR. 6,
Dvi ision of Water Resources
DEREK DENARD
Folder Right Side: (in chronological order — newest to oldest) 4_wUI J1,144y z ? /l of
M/Cover Letter (add new policy text)
L4.-** COC/ATC Permit (order: cover, ATC facility description, Map) fee,
[Facility Map (E-Map: include facility Outfall and location references) i
Permit Writer's Notes (chronology, strategy, APP Review)
Region Staff Report /Email (description of proposed treatment system )
Permit Application (New Permit; fee $100/$60 plans and specs from Engineer)
W 00 Acknowledgement Letter (NPDES Unit written response to Application)
7VPermittee Responses (AD -INFO request, if any) 4 f/2 t,,/1r�/
Note: Italics indicate "not always required or applicable." lI
Up ated BIMS Events [Drafting Initiated] Date / Z l Created Outfall in BIMS Date
go eDrawings (PDF) from Contractor: Request Date Received Date�� / l
a_ Water Supply (WS) Review: Yes N�A �by Date
Pee eview: Submitted to oe or other)
Peer Review completed by
O/ P6rf, tlailed / Emailed] to gional Staff /Contractor/Applicant
I-
z 74App/NOI Date
Date
Date
VRegional Review Ryi6ed [email or - Staff Report ] / Completed by �r Date -
FINAL to 00hfor signature [date] Letter Dated `S G FINAL returned Date: b
71NAL
w/ signatures [scanned to PDF] �INALS to Server [General Permits Folder] Date
Updated BIMS OutfalUEvents Date 0 G
Email ed FINAL PDFs Date ! to [County Health pplica�rto_�ntrTractd; other] according to letter footer
PDF Recipients (I S /> r,� i �C S C o --I
Version 14Jan2014
c��e,(

Denard, Derek
From: Weaver, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:26 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Parker, Michael; Denard, Derek; [e-mail]
Subject: receipt of application for 2040 Montrose Rd / Concord
Mr. Bridges:
The Division received your application for coverage under NPDES General Permit NCG550000 (and the correct fee of
$60.00) on February 2"d. The application has been assigned number NCG551614, and has been given to Derek Denard
for review.
If you have any questions during the review, contact him at 919-807-6307, or via e-mail [[e-mail]].
If Derek has any questions during his review of your application, he will contact you.
Charles H. Weaver
NPDES Unit

March 25, 2014
Memo To: Derek Denard
From: Michael Parker
Subject: Daniel Bridges Residence Residence (proposed)
General Permit No. NCG551614
Cabarrus County
This Office has conducted a preliminary review of the subject SFR permit application received in this
Office on February 10, 2014. Specifically, Mr. Bridges has applied to install a pre-fab wastewater treatment
system to serve a proposed 4-bedroom on a lot of approximately 4+ acres. Listed below are the items not
provided in the application that are necessary in order for the Division to complete the review of this project:
Information provided in the application indicated that an independent soils evaluation had been
conducted of the proposed site; however, this soils evaluation was not included in the application
package. A review of this independent soils evaluation will be necessary in order to properly review
this application request.
2. There was no evaluation by the applicant's engineer of other on -site non -discharge alternatives such as
drip irrigation or spray irrigation. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c) (2), a summary of all waste treatment
disposal options that were considered should be included in the application and why the proposed
system was selected. This summary should provide enough detail to ascertain whether all non -
discharge disposal options (both surface and subsurface) have been evaluated by a soils specialist.
A site visit was made on March 20, 2014. Observations made during the site visit indicate that the
drainage pattern at the proposed point of discharge would carry the effluent from this proposed
residence westward along Merivee Drive, through a roadside culvert underneath Monterosa Road, and
then northwestward into the yard of an nearby homeowner. There is no indication in the application
that the downslope property owner has been- made aware of the fact that effluent from an upslope SFR
would be released onto their property nor is there any documentation that the down slope property
owner has provided consent to allow this wastewater to travel across their property.
It should be noted that 15A NCAC 02B .0206(d)(2) stipulates that if the 7Q 10 and 30Q2 flows of the
proposed receiving waters are estimated to be zero, then no new or expanded discharges of oxygen consuming
wastes can be allowed. Based on our preliminary review of this application (and the March 20t" site visit), there is
no stream on this property and the proposed discharge from this system is planned for a roadside ditch where no
7Q10/30Q2 flow exists. It is my understanding that the Division is not applying the aforementioned Rule to
SFRs, and that the issuance of SFR permits is not contingent on whether or not they have access to surface waters
for which to assimilate their wastewater. Furthermore, consideration for SFR permit issuance apparently is not
being given to whether or not a residence has been established on the lot. This means that SFR permits are being
issued to.allow for discharges from residences proposed for undeveloped lots where local County Health
Departments have determined that conventional subsurface systems cannot be approved.

Page Two
If SFR discharges are being approved to dry ditches and channels having 7Q10/30Q2 flows that are
estimated to be zero, this would appear to be contrary to the intent of the Rule noted above. Furthermore,
allowing the issuance of SFR permits on undeveloped lots imposes added pressure on the Division to authorize
discharges on lots which likely should not be developed due to extremely poor draining soils, topographical
constraints such as in flood prone areas, or�they happen to be located adjacent to a water supply reservoir where
direct access to the reservoir (via pipe) is not allowed by the regulating utility company. In most cases, there are
generally good reasons why certain lots sit empty for years in built -out developments — there is no acceptable
subsurface means of handling the disposal of the wastewater generated from a residence built on the property.
Typically, these lots are offered for sale at substantially cheaper prices than adjacent lots where conventional
septic systems have been approved by the Division of Environmental Health (DEH)., Eventually, these marginal
lots with poor soils or other topographic issues become attractive to prospective homeowners so much so that they
are willing to ignore their due diligence and buy the property in the hope that they can get some kind of disposal
system permitted. Fortunately, many prospective homeowners do not enter into a contractual agreement on the
property, so their inability to obtain a SFR permit does not pose an economic hardship. However, a number of
cases have come through this Office where sufficient soils information existed prior to the sale of the property
that documented the existence of poorly drained soils or severe topographical constraints and the buyer continued
with the purchase of the lot without assurance of a permanent wastewater disposal option.
This Office has historically denied all SFR applications except in cases where there was an existing
residence and DEH and outside soil experts had documented that there were no surface or sub -surface non -
discharge alternatives. Even when SFR permits were granted in this region, attempts were made to obtain direct
access to surface waters so that assimilation of the effluent could be met. Allowing discharges to dry ditches and
other conveyances sets the Division up for complaints from down gradient property owners from both an aesthetic
as well as a public health standpoint. Continuing to allow dry -ditch discharges from SFRS highlights a level of
disparity that exists in our NPDES application review process for SFRs, but not other NPDES domestic
wastewater permits.
/mlp

Division of Water Resources
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
RCDENR Application for Coverage Under General Permit
NCG550000
Single Family Residences andlor facilities discharging
< 1000 gallons per day of domestic wastewater
NOTICE OF INTENT
[Required by .15A NCAC 02H .0127(d)1; [term definition see 15A NCAC 02H .0103(19)]
(Press TAB to navigate form)
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
Day
Certificate of Coverage
N
C
G 1
5
5
Check #
Amount
Assigned To:
1. Regional. Office contact (Please note: This application will be returned if you have not met with a
representative from the appropriate regional office.):
Please list the NCDENR Regional Office representative(s) with whom you have met:
Name(s): Michael Parker Date: 1/29/2014
2. Mailing address of owner/operator: (address to which all correspondence should be mailed)
Owner Name Daniel Bridges
Street Address 5009 Silabot Ave.
City Charlotte State NC Zip28205 -
Telephone # (Id) Telephone # (W)
Cell/Mobile # [phone] Email [e-mail]
3. Location of facility producing discharge: (Iffacility is not yet constructed, give street address or lot #)
Street Address 2040 Monterosa Road
City Concord
County Cabarrus
Telephone #
4. Physical location information:
State NC Zip 28025 -
Cell/Mobile # [phone]
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and distance
and direction from a roadway intersection). I-485 to Albemarle Road: take exit - head south, take left onto Lower
Rocky River Road, proceed to take a left onto Monterosa Road and proceed to end of road. Site is on the right
5. This NPDES permit application applies to which of the following:
® New [term definition see 15A NCAC 02H .0103(16)], or Proposed (system not constructed)
❑ Existing [term definition see 15A NCAC 02H .0l03(11)]; If previously permitted by local or county health
department, please provide the permit number
and issue date Click here to enter a.date.
❑ Modification; please describe the. nature of the modification:
Page 1 of 4 Revised 911113

NCG550000 New Application
6. Description of Discharge: [Required by 15A NCAC 021-1.0105(c)(1)1
a) Amount of wastewater to be discharged:
Number of bedrooms 4 x 120 gallons per bedroom = 480
480 gallons per day to be permitted
b) Type of facility producing waste (please check one):
® Primary residence ❑ Vacation/second home
❑ Other:
7. Please check the components that comprise the wastewater treatment system:
[Required by 15A NCAC 02H.0 105(cN3)1
® Septic tank ❑ Dosing tank
❑ Primary sand filter ❑ Secondary sand filter ❑ Recirculating sand filter(s)
❑ Chlorination ❑ Dechlorination ® Other form of disinfection: UV Light
® Post Aeration (speck type) Sentitech M400
8. For new or proposed systems only - Please address the feasibility of alternatives to discharging for the
following options in the cover letter for this application:
[Evaluation required by G.S. § 143-215.1(b)(5)(a) and 15A NCAC 02H .bi05(c)(2)1
a) Connection to a Regional or Municipal Sewer Collection System.
b) Letter from local or county health department describing the suitability or non -suitability of the site for all types of
wastewater ground adsorption and innovative non -discharge systems. Document the repair potential of the failed
system.
c) Land Application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
9,. Receiving waters: [Required by 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c)(1)]
a) What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility wastewater
discharges end up in? Tributary of Reedy Creek
b) Stream Classification (if known): Clas "C"
10. The application must include the following or it will be returned, as allowed by 15A NCAC 02H .0107(b):
a) For Certificates of Coverage:
® An original letter.and two (1) copy requesting coverage under NCG550000.
® A signed and completed original and one copy of this Notice of Intent Application.
® A check or money order for the permit fee of $60.00 [per G.S. Q 143-215.3(a)(1b)] made payable to NCDENR.
ElInvoice showing that the septic tank has been pumped and serviced within the last 12 months (only when
existing service tank will be used).
Page 2 of 4 Revised 911113

NCG550000 New Application .
New or proposed facilities must also include. -
Letter from the county health department evaluating the proposed site for all types of ground absorption and
innovative non -discharge systems. Document the repair potential of the failed system.
® Evaluation of connection to a regional sewer system (approximate distance & cost to connect).
® Provide a 7Q10 flow estimate at the proposed wastewater discharge point from the US Geological Survey (919-
571-4000)
b) For an Authorization to Construct (ATC) only: (Note: There is no fee for an ATC)
❑ A letter requesting an ATC
❑ Three sets of plans, and specifications (required by 15A NCAC 02H .0138) of proposed treatment system (see
Permit Application Checklist and Design Criteria for Single Family Discharge)
❑ Invoice showing that the septic tank has been pumped and serviced within the last 12 months (only when
existing septic tank will be used).
Additional Application Requirements:
a) If this application is.being submitted by a consulting engineer (or engineering firm), include
documentation from the applicant showing that the engineer (or firm) submitting the application has
been designated an authorized Representative of the applicant, per 15A NCAC 02H .0138(b)(1).
b) If this application is being submitted by a consulting engineer (or engineering firm), final plans for the
treatment system must be signed and sealed by a North Carolina registered Professional En ig neer and
stamped -"Final Design -Not released for construction;" per 15A NCAC 02H .0139. .
c) If this application is being submitted by a consulting engineer (or engineering firm), final specifications
for all major treatment components must be signed and sealed by a North Carolina registered
Professional Engineer and shall include a narrative description of the treatment system to be
constructed; per 15A NCAC 02H .0139.
Page 3 of 4 Revised 911113

NCG550000 New Application.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and .that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: Daniel Bridges
Title: Owner
(Please review 15A NCAC 02H .0106(e) for authorized signing officials)
"_" -"� Digitally signed by [e-mail]
pN: cn=[e-mail]
Date: 2014.01281452:36-05'00' Click here to enter a date.
(Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
North Carolina General Statute & 143-215.6113 provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in. any application, record, report, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or: who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a,rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers .with, or
knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article
or rules of the Commission implementing this Article, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine or imprisonment not more than 5
years, or both, for a similar offense.
Application must be accompanied bv,a check or money order for $60 00 [per G S. 143-215 3(a2(lb)]
made payable to:
NCDENR
Mail this application and one copy ,of the entire package (with check) to:
NC DENR /.DWR / Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Attn: Charles Weaver
Note: The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit
Page 4 of 4 Revised 911113

I \
I \
'PROP O ED
\ WASTEWA f�ER
\ 2"Sch.40 PVC \ \ O SYSTEM \
\ Discharge Line \
' I i \ (Glued Joints) \ _�
p
4—bdrm
HOUSE \
I
j 90,
\ ' Proposed \
l \ \ Water O
1 Well
LJ
Shed
0\
-----------— — — — — — — \ ; \ \+- - --------------- � --
\ I\ \®\
l \ \ d \
I \\ Q \\O \
LPipe(F)
I Bent — �L �- — —
Inv. 587.7.3 -
-o
V� \Monterosa Road
— — — — — — —,
PROK<r..
Daniel Bridges
Residence at:
4020 Monterosa Road
Concord, NC 28025
DESCIRRIM:
Direct Discharge Wastewater
Treatment System for up to
4 Bedroom House
Submittal:1-23-14
DANIEL BRIDGES
RESIDENCE
2040 Monterosa Road
E D @ r=
FFEB 0 2 2014
LASH
ENGINEERING
Conauf fng C1W Mminea6ftiner
904 Cln4 Carr Drive
Matthmo, N.C. 28105
Mm&.7041847-,3031
emall: mlkelft9hmglnwdng com

_�
�:
.-
���
_ � .�
;
i
_�, '

March 25, 2014
Memo To: Derek Denard
From: Michael Parkermp
Subject: Daniel Bridges Residence (proposed)
General Permit No. NCG551614
Cabarrus County
This Office has conducted a preliminary review of the subject SFR permit application received in this
Office on February 10, 2014. Specifically, Mr. Bridges has applied to install a pre-fab wastewater treatment
system to serve a proposed 4-bedroom on a lot of approximately 4+ acres. Listed below are the items not
provided in the application that are necessary in order for the Division to complete the review of this project:
Information provided in the application indicated that an independent soils evaluation had been
conducted of the proposed site; however, this soils evaluation was not included in the application
package. A review of this independent soils evaluation will be necessary in order to properly review
this application request.
2. There was no evaluation by the applicant's engineer of other on -site non -discharge alternatives such as
drip irrigation or spray irrigation. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c) (2), a summary of all waste treatment
disposal options that were considered should be included in the application and why the proposed
system was selected. This summary should provide enough detail to ascertain whether all non -
discharge disposal options (both surface and subsurface) have been evaluated by a soils specialist.
3. A site visit was made on March 20, 2014. Observations made during the site visit indicate that the
drainage pattern at the proposed point of discharge would carry the effluent from this proposed
residence westward along Merivee Drive, through a roadside culvert underneath Monterosa Road, and
then northwestward into the yard of an nearby homeowner. There is no indication in the application
that the downslope property owner has been made aware of the fact that effluent from an upslope SFR
would be released onto their property nor is there any documentation that the down slope property
owner has provided consent to allow this wastewater to travel across their properly.
It should be noted that 15A NCAC 02B .0206(d)(2) stipulates that if the 7Q10 and 30Q2 flows of the
proposed receiving waters are estimated to be zero, then no new or expanded discharges of oxygen consuming
wastes can be allowed. Based on our preliminary review of this application (and the March 20'h site visit), there is
no stream on this property and the proposed discharge from this system is planned for a roadside ditch where no
7Q10/30Q2 flow exists. It is my understanding that the Division is not applying the aforementioned Rule to
SFRs, and that the issuance of SFR permits is not contingent on whether or not they have access to surface waters
for which to assimilate their wastewater. Furthermore, consideration for SFR permit issuance apparently is not
being given to whether or not a residence has been established on the lot. This means that SFR permits are being
issued to allow for discharges from residences proposed for undeveloped lots where local County Health
Departments have determined that conventional subsurface systems cannot be approved.
'A

Page Two
If SFR discharges are being approved to dry ditches and channels having 7Q10/30Q2 flows that are
estimated to be zero, this would appear to be contrary to the intent of the Rule noted above. Furthermore,
allowing the issuance of SFR permits on undeveloped lots imposes added pressure on the Division to authorize
discharges on lots which likely should not be developed due .to extremely poor draining soils, topographical
constraints such as in flood prone areas, or they happen to be located adjacent to a water supply reservoir where
direct access to the reservoir (via pipe) is not allowed by the regulating utility company. In most cases, there are
generally good reasons why certain lots sit empty for years in built -out developments — there is no acceptable
subsurface means of handling the disposal of the wastewater generated from a residence built on the property.
Typically, these lots are offered for sale at substantially cheaper prices than adjacent lots where conventional
septic systems have been approved by the Division of Environmental Health (DEH).. Eventually, these marginal
lots with poor soils or other topographic issues become attractive to prospective homeowners so much so that they
are willing to ignore their due diligence and buy the property in the hope that they can get some kind of disposal
system permitted. Fortunately, many prospective homeowners do not enter into a contractual agreement on the
property, so their inability to obtain a SFR permit does not pose an economic hardship. However, a number of
cases have come through this Office where sufficient soils information existed prior to the sale of the property
that documented the existence of poorly drained soils or severe topographical constraints and the buyer continued
with the purchase of the lot without assurance of a permanent wastewater disposal option.
This Office has historically denied all SFR applications except in cases where there was an existing
residence and DEH and outside soil experts had documented that there were no surface or sub -surface non -
discharge alternatives. Even when SFR permits were granted in this region, attempts were made to obtain direct
access to surface waters so that assimilation of the effluent could be met. Allowing discharges to dry ditches and
other conveyances sets the Division up for complaints from down gradient property owners from both an aesthetic
as well as a public health standpoint. Continuing to allow dry -ditch discharges from SFRS highlights a level of
disparity that exists in our NPDES application review process for SFRS, but not other NPDES domestic
wastewater permits.
/mlp

MRO 11
too Division of Water Resources
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
NCDENR Application for Coverage Under General Permit
NCG550000
Single Family Residences and/or facilities discharging
< 1000 gallons per day of domestic wastewater
NOTICE OF INTENT
[Required by 15A NCAC 02H .0127(d)1; [term definition see 15A NCAC 02H .0103(19)1
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
Day
Certificate of Coverage .
N
Tc
T 1
5
1 5
Check #
Amount
Assigned To: /)e 7
RECEIVED
DIVISION r�r '!"" =R QUAe I"P(
(Press TAB to navigate form)
-FEB I 2014
1. Regional Office contact, (Please note: This application will be returned if you have not met with a
representative from the appropriate -regional office.):
Please list the NCDENR Regional Office representative(s) with whom you have met: �j
Namew.. Michael Parker Date: 1129/2A,
so
2. Mailing address of owner/operator: (address to which all correspondence should be mailed) �9if'Oyp."
4.
Owner Name
Street Address
City
Telephone # (H)
Cell/Mobile #
Daniel Bridges
5009 Silabot Ave. �, ��� i�'s�tcd►
Charlotte State NC Zip28205 -����� �® C
I Telephone # (W) L,. ��i FIP
980-253-1269
Location of facility producing discharge:
Street Address 2040 Monterosa Road
City Concord
County Cabarrus
Telephone #
Physical location information:
Email [e-mail]
y�y
(If facility is not yet constructed, give street address or.lotj
State NC Zip 28025 -
Cell/Mobile # [phone]
Please provide a narrative, description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and distance
and direction from a roadway intersection). I-485 to Albemarle Road, take exit - head south, take left onto Lower
Rocky River Road, proceed to take a left onto Monterosa Road and proceed to end of road. Site is on the right.
This NPDES permit application applies to which of the following:
® New [term definition see 15A NCAC 02H .0103(16)] or Proposed (system not constructed)
❑ Existing [term definition see 15A NCAC 02H .010301 A; If previously permitted by local or county health
department, please provide the permit number
and issue date Click here to enter a date.
❑ Modification; please describe the nature of the modification:
Page 1 of 4 Revised 911113

ppppppp
NCG550000 New Application
6. Description of Discharge: [Required by 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c)(1)1
a) Amount of wastewater to be discharged:
Number of bedrooms 4 x 120 gallons per bedroom = 480
480 gallons per day to be permitted
b) Type of facility producing waste (please check one):
® Primary residence ❑ Vacation/second home
❑ Other:
7. Please check the components that comprise the wastewater treatment system:
[Required by 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c)(3)1
® Septic tank ❑ Dosing tank
❑ Primary sand filter ❑ Secondary sand filter ❑ Recirculating sand filter(s)
❑ Chlorination ❑ Dechlorination ® Other form of disinfection: UV Light
® Post Aeration (specify type) Sel2titech M-400
.8. For new or proposed systems only - Please address the feasibility of alternatives to discharging for the
following options in the cover letter for this application:
[Evaluation required by G.S. § 143-215.1(b)(5)(a) and 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c)(2)]
a) Connection to a Regional or Municipal Sewer Collection System.
b) Letter from local or county health department describing the suitability or non -suitability of the site for all types of
wastewater ground adsorption. and innovative non -discharge systems. Document the repair potential of the failed
system.
c) Land Application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
9. Receiving waters: [Required by 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c)(1)1
a) . What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility wastewater
discharges end up in? Tributary of Reedy Creek
b) Stream Classification (if known): Clas "C"
10. The application must include the following or it will be returned, as allowed by 15A NCAC 02H .0107(b):
a) For Certificates of Coverage:
® An original letter and two (1) copy requesting coverage under NCG550000.
® A signed and completed original and one copy of this Notice of Intent Application.
® A check or money order for the permit fee of $60.00 [per G.S. & 143-215.3(a)(1b)1 made payable.to NCDENR.
❑ Invoice showing that the septic tank has been pumped and serviced within the last 12 months, (only when
existing service tank will be used).
Page 2 of 4 Revised 911113

NCG550000 New Application
New or proposed facilities must also include.
® Letter from the county health department evaluating the proposed site for all types of ground absorption and
innovative non -discharge systems. Document the repair potential of the failed system.
® Evaluation of connection to a regional sewer system (approximate distance & cost to connect).
® Provide a 7Q10 flow estimate at the proposed wastewater discharge point from the US Geological Survey (919-
571-4000)
b) For an Authorization to Construct (ATC) only: (Note: There is no fee for an ATC)
❑ A letter requesting an ATC
❑ Three sets of plans and specifications (required by 15A NCAC 02H .0138) of proposed treatment system (see
Permit Application Checklist and Design Criteria for Single Family Discharge)
❑ Invoice showing that the septic tank has been pumped and serviced within the last 12 months (only when
existing septic tank will be used).
Additional Application Requirements:
a) If this application is being submitted by a consulting engineer (or engineering firm), include
documentation from the applicant showing that the engineer (or firm) submitting the application has
been designated an authorized Representative'of the applicant, per 15A NCAC 02H .0138(b)(11.
b) If this application is being submitted by a consulting engineer (or engineering firm), final plans for the
treatment system must be signed and sealed by a North Carolina registered Professional En ig neer and
stamped -"Final Design -Not released for construction;" per 15A NCAC 02H .0139.
c) If this application is being submitted by a consulting engineer (or engineering firm), final specifications
for all major treatment components must be signed and sealed by a North Carolina registered
Professional Engineer and shall include a narrative description of the treatment system to be
constructed; per 15A NCAC 02H .0139.
Page 3 of 4 Revised 911113

pppppp
NCG550000 New Application
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: Daniel Bridges
Title: Owner
(Please review 15A NCAC 02H .0106(e) for authorized signing officials)
DN:ca= ridges [e-mail]"
[e-mail]
_
�I Date:2014.012814:5236-05'00' Click Mire to enter a date.
(Signature of Applicant) :?4` (Date Signed)
North Carolina General Statute $ 143-215.613 provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or.who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact. in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or "
knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or -maintained under this Article
or rules of the Commission implementing this Article, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine or imprisonment not more than 5
'years, or both, for a similar offense.
Apolication must be_a_ccompanied by a check or monev order for $60.00 filer G.S. 143-2'15.3(a)(1b)l
made payable to-
NCDENR
Mail -this application' and one copy of the entire package (with check) to:
NC DENR_/ DWR./ Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Attn: Charles Weaver
Note: The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit
Page 4 of 4 Revised 911113

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Daniel Bridges; Wastewater System
Direct Discharge,. NC. DWQ Application Submittal
Revisions
Table of Contents
1. Table of Contents
2. Response (in red),to Review Comments
3. Soil & Site Evaluation (from Soil Scientist)
4. Engineer's Evaluation of Drip & Spray Disposal
5. Town of Harrisburg — Available Sewer — additional email
6. Engineer's Sewer Availability Report
Also: 3 Sets of Plans are included in this submittal.
a. Plans revised' to show Drip & Spray setbacks-
b. Units moved to reflect 15' off foundation.
c. 1,000'gailon septic tank labeled.
(RECEIVED/I)ENR/DINR /
APR 2 i 2014
Dilater Resources
Permitting section

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
mikel@LashEn ing eerie .com
Lash Engineering, Inc.
April 14, 2014
Derek Denard
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC. 27699-1617
Re: Bridges Property, Cabarrus County
Response to State Review comments in red
We have received comments from the regional office for the subject project. Before we can
move forward we need the following additional information:
Information provided in the application indicated that an independent soils evaluation had
been conducted of the proposed site; however, this soils evaluation was not included in
the application package. A review of this independent soils evaluation will be necessary
in order to properly review this application request. A copy of the Soil Scientist Report
has been included in this submittal.
There was no evaluation by the applicant's engineer of other on -site non -discharge
alternatives such as drip irrigation or spray irrigation. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0105(c) (2),
a summary of all waste treatment disposal options that were considered should be
included in the application and why the proposed system was selected. This summary
should provide enough detail to ascertain whether all non -discharge disposal options
(both surface and subsurface) have been evaluated by a soils specialist. Spray and drip
irrigation non -discharge systems are permitted under 15A NCAC 02T .0600 and
information on this program can be found at the following web -site:
http://portal.ncdenr.or web/w /aps/lau/applications An evaluation into the use of Drip
or Spray irrigation was completed by the Engineer using the Soil Scientist
recommendations. A copy of that Evaluation is included in this Submittal.
• Please provide the approximate distance in mileage or feet and cost for construction in
dollars to the nearest municipal sewer collection system to demonstrate for our record
that this alternative is cost prohibitive. The nearest municipality in this location may be
contacted for an estimate of the cost per foot for sewer construction. A copy of the

Municipality email and associated Engineers Report is included in this submittal. In
short, the distance is far and there is a moratorium.
• On the site plans please indicate if the Septic tank and Sepitech treatment units are at the
minimum setback of 15 feet from the building foundation/basement. Plans were revised
to show and dimension this setback from the foundation.
The site plans on page 1 of 3 has a diagram in upper left corner of the septic tank and is
labeled as 1,250 gallons; however the septic tanks was labeled. or indicated elsewhere
(right below in bigger print) as a 1,000 gallon septic tank. Please make the necessary
corrections. The correction was made.
All corrections to the plans were noted as a revision and clouded for identification.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call or contact me.
Thanks,
Michael Lash, PE.

THOMPSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
WATER ♦ WASTEWATER ♦ WETLANDS
PHASE I SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION
2040 Monterosa Road
CQnQQrd, NQrth Carolina
Cabarrus County
PIN:55250924570000
April 2, 2014
Prepared for:
Daniel H. Bridges, PE
121 West Trade Street
Suite 1950
Charlotte, NC 28202
980-253-1269
Prepared by:
Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Larry Thompson, REHS, PWS, LSS
PO Box 541
Midland, NC 28107-0541
Cell: 704-301-4881
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
PO BOX 541! MIDLAND, NC r 28107-0541
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
E-MAIL: LARRYQTHOMPSONENV.COM
WEB: WWW.THOlvIPSONENV.COM

2040 Monterosa Road — 2 — November 26, 2013
INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (PEC) has performed a Phase I Soil and Site
Evaluation for septic tank suitability on approximately 3.48 acres of land located at 2040
Monterosa Road in Concord, North Carolina (PIN: 55250924570000). The property was
evaluated in accordance with North Carolina statutes for waste disposal ("Laws and Rules for
Sewage Treatment: and Disposal . Systems", Sections .1940 through .1944 (amended August
2007).
The property is currently undeveloped and has been previously cleared. Various stages of
secondary successional growth are evident.
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
The site evaluation was performed on November 25`''. A rubber track compact excavator was
utilized to dig deep pits throughout the study area. Observations of landscape (slope, drainage
patterns, past use, etc.) as 'well as soil properties (depth; texture, structure, seasonal wetness,
restrictive horizons, etc.) to unsuitable features were recorded.
FINDINGS
The most limiting soil property with respect to on -site suitability was depth to expansive.clay
and unsuitable saprolite. The surface texture is clay loam with subangular blocky structure _
and is less than 12 inches in depth. Subsoil texture is predominately clay with angular blocky
structure. The saprolite texture is clay loam with a granular structure. The soils were, for the
most part, fairly consistent and would be classified as "Unsuitable" for the installation of a
subsurface wastewater treatment and disposal system based upon the "Laws and Rules for
Sewage Treatmentand Disposal Systems", Section .1900 of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, specifically Section .1943- Soil Depth and .1956 Modifications to Septic Tank Systems.
CONCLUSIONS
TEC is not aware of any surface (surface drip or spray irrigation) or subsiurface wastewater
treatment disposal system (accepted, innovative, controlled demonstration, etc.) that is
currently approved by the state of North Carolina that can be used to assist with the
development of this property.
The findings presented herein represent TEC's professional opinion based upon our soil and
site evaluation and knowledge, of the current laws and regulations governing waste not
discharged to surface waters in addition to on -site wastewater systems in North Carolina. (Title
15A NCAC 2T and 18A .1900).
This report has been prepared for planning purposes only. Any concurrence with the findings
of this report would be made by a representative of the Cabarrus County Environmental

2040 Monterosa Road — 3 — November 26, 2013
Health Department, the delegated authority for septic system permitting within Cabarrus
County or a representative of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources.

Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 641
Midland, NC 28107-0641
704-3014881
OWNER: Daniel H. Bridges
LOCATION: 2040 Moterossa Road
SHEET 1 OF
COUNTY: Cabarrus
TAX ID: 55250924570000,
DATE: November 25, 2013
PROFILES
Pit 1
Pit 2
Pit 3
Pit 4
Pit 5
Pit 6
Pit 7
LANDSCAPE POSITION
.1940
Is
Is
Is
Is
Is
Is
Is
SCOPE l
: f940
5-/o—
�3°/ro—
50/6--
—5°�
� 5%--
50%
HORIZON 1 DEPTH
.1943
0-3
0-6
0-5
0-4
0-6
0-4
0-5
TEXTURE
.1941 a (1)
cl
cl
cl
cl
cl
cl.
cl
CONSISTENCE
.1941
fr
fr
fr
fr
fr
I fr
fr
STRUCTURE
.1941 a 2
r
qr
gr
gr
gr
gr
gr
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a)(3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HORIZON 2-DEPTH
.1943 .
3-24
6-36
.5-36
4-32
6-34
4-24 '
5-32
'TEXTURE
.1941 (a)(1)
c
.e
C
C.
C
-. C
c
CONSISTENCE
.1941
Vfi
Vfi
Vfi
Vfi
vfi
Vfi
vfi
STRUCTURE
.1941 a 2
abk
abk
abk
abk
abk
abk
abk
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a)(3)
a
e.
e
e
e
e
e
HORIZON 3 DEPTH
.1943
36-75+
36-75+
34-75+
24-75+
TEXTURE
.1941 a 1 ,
cl
cl
cl
cl
CONSISTENCE
.1941
fr
fr
fr
fr
STRUCTURE
.194.1 a (2)
gr
gr
gr
gr
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a)(3)
-
-
-
HORIZON 4 DEPTH
.1943
TEXTURE
.1941 a)(1
CONSISTENCE
1941
STRUCTURE
.1941 a 2
CLAY MINERALOGY
.1941 (a)(3)
SOIL WETNESS
.1942
RESTRICTIVE HORIZON
.1944
24
32
32
SAPROLITE
.1943/.1956
36+
36+
34+
24+'
-CLASSIFICATI=OTI��
1-94
u
u
u
u
u
u
to
L.T.A.R. (gpd/ft2)
.1955
OTHER FACTORS (.1946): ,
SITE LTAR(gpd/ft2): NIA
AVAILABLE SPACE .1945 : unsuitable
SITE CLASSIFICATION (.1948): unsuitable
SYSTEM TYPE: N/A
EVALUATED BY: Larry Thompson OTHERS PRESENT:
COMMENTS:

PIN 5515987667000000
Property Real ID
01:029=0051.00
Parcel PIN
Physical Address:
2009 MONTEROSARD CONCORD NC 28025
Land Units
Owner Name 1:
JAMIESON WILLIAM HOWARD SR
Land Units Type
Owner Name 2:
Calculated Acreage
Mailing Address:
2009 MONTEROSARD
Land Value
Mail City:
CONCORD
Building Value
Mail State:
NC
Assessed Value
Mail Zip:
28025
Market Value
Cabamis County shall not be held fable for any errors In the Ma . Created
data represented on this record. This includes errors ofanission, �•- BYCabarrusCountylTDepartment
canmission concernngthe axitenlofthe data, and relative Data Sources: Cabarrus County Land Records
positional accuracy of the data. The data cannot be construed to
be a legal document. Primary sources from which this data was Source: Esd, D'igitalGlobe, GeoEye, 1-cubed, USDA, USGS, AB7
compiled must be consulted forverification Getmapping,Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisslopo, and the GIS User Community
of information represented on this map document.
55159876670000
293
AC
2926021
52910
152310
205220
205220
1:1,128
0 0.0075 0.015 . 0.03 ft
1 , - - " ? . �7 I - I
0 0.015 0.63 0.66 m
Print Date: April 10, 2014

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28165
Phone: [phone]
mikel@LashEnginecrin%z.com
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Evaluation of:
Drip & Spray Irrigation Systems
Bridges: 2040 Monterosa Road
An evaluation of the soils was completed by the Soil Scientist and his evaluation
included the use of Spray or Surface Drip disposal systems. His findings were
such that the soils were not adequate for these type disposal systems.
The setbacks for these systems were added to the plan. Spray has the most
restrictive setbacks with the 150' off the property lines and 100' from the water
well as the most restrictive. It is not customary for Lash Engineering to propose
spray irrigation on a smaller site that will be used for a residential use. The useable
available land for spray is approximately 0.25 acres or 1500 sf. The soil is not
adequate for this alternative so the spray irrigation alternative was not investigated
further.
The setbacks for the Surface Drip System were also added to the plan. These
setbacks are less restrictive and are more conducive to a small site residential
setting. The useable land is approximately 0.50 acres or 2500 sf. The soil is not
adequate for this alternative so the Surface Drip alternative was not investigated
further.
Based upon the Soil Scientist report, the available land for disposal and the lack of
sufficient adequate soils; it is our opinion that a Direct Discharge system with a
Denitrofication treatment, and a LTV light for disinfection is the preferred
alternative.

RE: Daniel Bridges Residential Wastewater
Subject: RE:, baniel Bridges Residential Wastewater
From: "Josh Watkins" <JWatkins@harrisburgnc:org>
Date: 4/15/2014 2:23 PM
To: ".Michael Lash, PE." <[e-mail]>
Mike,
There is no public sewer available to this site. The closest sewer
interceptor is along the Reedy Creek, to the north of this property.
The Town of Harrisburg and Cabarrus County have an interlocal agreement
that restricts utility extensions south of the Reedy Creek interceptor.
Even if the interceptor ran through this property; no taps into the line
would be allowed until at least January 1, 2016:
Please let me know if you have_any questions.
With anything you may need.
Thanks,
Josh Watkins
Planning Director
Town of Harrisburg
I will be happy to assist
-----Original Message - ----
From: Michael Lash, PE.[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April i5, 20i4 2:09 PM
To: Josh Watkins.
Subject: Daniel Bridges Residential Wastewater
I am hoping that Tom Bock has spoken to you about this already. I have
included an USGS map.that shows the location of the property.
I am an engineer and have designed an advanced wastewater treatment
system for Mr. Bridges and submitted it to the State. Earlier, I
received from Derek Slocum an email that stated that public sewer was
not available, which is a requirement with the State. His statement was
riot detailed enough grid the State has requested that I supply them with
more information.. In talking with Tom it appears that cost of the
extension is not the question but that the area has an extension
restriction (Area-1) to it making a flow acceptance impossible at this
time.
I need.something official to include in my resubmittal that states in
more detail that public sewer is not available to this site. A reply to
this email is sufficient..
If sewer is available, then a location of the closest manhole would be
sufficient.
Please call me
Thanks,
Mike
[phone]
if you have any questions.
1 of 2 4/15/2014 2:33 PM

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/P-laming
--- - �! 1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
----:`_: _1_.._--.___ Phone: [phone]
mikel(c UshEn ink eering com
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Bridges - Public Sewer Availability
Josh Watkins (Planning Director) and Derek Slocum (Town Engineer) were contacted on different
occasions for the availability of sewer for this property. Other municipalities were contacted as well;
the Town of Midland. Town of Locust, and Stanly County, The Town of Harrisburg has jurisdiction
and anemail from Josh Watkins has been included in this submittal.
Derek Slocum responded initially to me with an email statement (in previous submittal) that no
public sewer, was available. The email submitted with this submittal provides more detail
information. According to our conversations, this area falls within Area #1 of an Interlocal
Agreement. Area #1 currently has a moratorium on wastewater availability for at least another 2
years — so, no sewer allocation is possible for this site.
In his email, Josh points out that the nearest sewer is currently located along Reedy Creek, which is
north of this site. Gravity sewer would actually be able to flow north. The distance is approximately
6,300 feet. So, if sewer were available the approximate cost would be in the neighborhood of:
Approximate costs:
6300'/8" gravity sewer laid adjacent to the existing tributary creek.
@ $110.00/ft. for manholes, easement acquisition, surveying and installation » $700,000
Additional cost for crossing to other side of creek k could easily add another $50,000
Total Approximate Cost $750,000
Conclusion:
There are no plans for extending the sanitary sewer closer to the site at this time. The distance and
associated costs for these improvements are cost prohibitive for a single home owner. R/W access
may not even be available from the appropriate land owners. But paramount to the costs, is that there
is a moratorium on the sewer facilities from accepting additional flow.
If I can be of any further service, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Michael Lash, PE.