The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSurry 62 - Bridge FSM Worksheet NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET WBS No.: BP11.R004.1 Field Scoping Meeting Date: January 27, 2021 Division: 11 Location: On-Site Route (US/NC/SR): SR 1350 County: Surry Project Description: Bridge No.850062 on SR 1350 (Red Brush Road) over Stewart’s Creek Tier: Regional Municipality: Attendees Name Phone No. E-mail Division Bridge Manager Joe Laws jlaws@ncdot.gov Assistant Bridge Program Mark Johnson mgjohnson4@ncdot.gov Manager Division Construction *Trent Beaver tbeaver@ncdot.gov Engineer Division Construction Staff Greg Johnston gjohnston@ncdot.gov Engineer Boone District Engineer *Randall Miles rsmiles@ncdot.gov Utility Coordinator *Susan Huffman sohuffman@ncdot.gov Environmental Officer Kevin Hining kjhining@ncdot.gov Division Maintenance *Charles Reinhardt creinhardt@ncdot.gov Engineer Division R/W Agent Daneil Miles d miles@ncdot.gov Locations & Survey *Larry Absher lrabsher@ncdot.gov NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Marc Shown mshown@ncdot.gov NCDOT Hydraulics Unit *Jon Moore jlmoore6@ncdot.gov NCDOT SMU *Keith Paschal kpaschal@ncdot.gov NCDOT GEU *Dean Hardister dhardister@ncdot.gov FWS *Janet Mizzi/Holland janet_mizzi@fws.gov Youngman holland_youngman@fws.gov USACE *Lori Beckwith Loretta.A.Beckwith@usace.army.mil NC WRC *Marla Chambers marla.chambers@ncwildlife.org NCDWR *Dave Wanucha dave.wanucha@ncdenr.gov 1 of 6 TGS Jimmy Terry jterry@tgsengineers.com TGS Leonard Fletcher lfletcher@tgsengineers.com Jay Twisdale jtwisdale@tgsengineers.com TGS TGS *Randy Henegar rhenegar@tgsengineers.com CG2 Matt Brewer mbrewer@carolinasgeotech.com Telics Patrick Jones patrickjones@telics.com *Invited but could not attend. 2 of 6 Existing Features Feature Bridged: 850062 over Stewart’s Creek on SR 1350 Ex. Bridge Clear Deck Width: 22 (Ft.) Roadway width: 18 (Ft.) (Bridge / Culvert) Length: 158 (Ft.) Deck Width (Out To Out): 23.3 (Ft.) Water Depth: (Ft.) Height Bed-To-Crown: (Ft.) Year Built: 1951 Posted: SV 24 TTST: 28 Superstructure: Reinforced Abutment: Reinforced Pier Type: Reinforced Concrete Floor on Concrete Caps on Timber Concrete Post & Beam Piles I-Beams Temp. Shored: No Historic High Water (Elev. To The Existing Structure ): Ft. PRI: DP: SR: 35 School Bus crossings per day: Posted Speed Limit Vicinity: 35 mph Detour Off-Site Stage Construction New Alignment On-site Downstream If Off-Site, Description Of Detour Route: Approximate Length Of Detour? Improvements Needed To Road(s) On Detour ? Div. Traffic Eng. Recommend Off-site detour signing? Improvements Needed To Bridges On Detour? Are future plans for upgrading this roadway either at or in the vicinity of this project? Are Bridges On Detour Currently Programmed ? Are There EMS Or Business Access Issues ? Are There Any Railroad Crossings On Detour? Should Work Zone Pedestrian Access Be Maintained During Construction? N/A Overhead Utility Lines In Conflict Yes – OH Power – Three Phase Power Transmission Lines In Conflict Telephone In Conflict Yes Cable Lines In Conflict Yes Fiber Optic In Conflict Water In Conflict None anticipated. Sewer In Conflict Natural Gas In Conflict Other In Conflict Is There Any Future Utility Construction Anticipated In The Project Area? Is a FEMA Buy-Out Property Being Impacted: No 3 of 6 Environmental Wetlands At Site: Comments: Endangered Species In County: Gray Bat; Schweinitz’s sunflower; NLEB T&E species effect: Trout County : Yes TVA County: No CAMA County; No Primary Nursery Area: No Moratoria: No Which species: Duration : Water Quality Classification: C 303d: No Coast Guard Permit? No Drainage Basin: Yadkin PeeDee Riparian Buffer Rules: No Is The Project Site In Or Near Any Of The Following: National Forest: No Wildlife Refuge/Gamelands: No State, County, Or Local Park: No Wild And Scenic River: No Airport: No Recreation Or Power Generation: No Water Supply Reservoir: Yes Nutrient Sensitive Waters: No Public Use Boat Ramp: No Cemeteries: No VAD-Farmland Preservation: Yes Known Or Potential Historic Properties In The Area: Architecture: No Survey Required (2016) Archaeology: No Survey Required (2016) Is The Bridge Structure Itself, Or Any Part Thereof, Considered Historic: No Impacts to a Church, Community Center, Or Other Public Facility? No Is this a Statewide Bicycle Route or a Local Non-Marked Bicycle Route: Comments: Mount Airy Water Plant Geotechnical Are There Any Historical and/or Vibration Sensitive Structures Nearby: Yes Comments: Houses Are There Any Known Landfills And / Or Geo-environmental Hazard Sites At Or Within Close Proximity To The Project Site? No Comments: Are Any Impacts Anticipated To Natural Springs Or Artesian Wells: No Comments: Possible Foundation Type: H-Piles at end bents and drilled shafts for interior bent(s) 4 of 6 Hydraulics FEMA Approval? Yes, Detailed State Storm water Permit? N/A Is There Unusual Scour Potential? No Is Protection Needed? STD Are Banks Stable? Yes Is Protection Needed? STD Appreciable Amount Of Large Debris? Yes, moderate Placement Of Bents In The Water Be Allowed: No Where: Superstructure Type: Bridge If Bridge: 24” CS If girder; why? Length Of Structure: 170’ Min. Number Of Spans: 3 Span Arrangement: 1@50,1@70,1@50 Waive offset: No Cap: 4’ Skewed: No, 90 degrees Comments: Spill through abutments Items To Be Discussed / Resolved At FSM By Attendees Off-Site Detour Stage: New Alignment: On-site detour CRW: Clear roadway width (CRW): one lane w/ signals; Alignment; N, E, W, S Temp. Signals: or two lanes CRW; Alignment: N, E, W, S Alignment; Environmental Document Prepared by DBE: Low Impact Data Spreadsheet Minimum Criteria Checklist ADT: 2,300 per Maps NHS: No Tier: Regional Func. Class: Major Collector Bridge Min. Clear Deck Width Recommended by Div.: 33’ OTO Roadway lane width _11_‘ with _8_‘ turf shoulders w/ 4’ paved shoulders Pave to face of guardrail and taper 8:1 to travel lane/paved shoulder? Yes Min. Pavement Surface Course: inches: Existing Roadway: Paved Pavement Marking: Paint Pavement markers: Snowplowable Will Railroad Involvement Be Required: No Method of Clearing: Method II Truck Percentage: 7 % per BIR Reasonable Safe Speed per SIR: Liquidated damages: will be imposed after days of closure/construction. Amt: $ per day CEI by? NCDOT R/W by? NCDOT R/W monuments? Pin/Caps and Monument existing R/W with new alignment Salvageable materials: I-Beams Contact Person/number: Gary Robbins 336-530-6050 Deliver to: Elkin Bridge Office (Oakland Drive) Removal of previous structure remnant abutments/piers: Comments: NCDOT to provide pavement design. Rock cut in NE quadrant to be investigated. 5 of 6 Gate with soil drive in NE quadrant will be difficult to maintain. Closing drive is acceptable. Parallel stream in NW quadrant. Should be avoided due to new alignment. Large truck tracking evident at intersection. Design for larger turning vehicles. Structure Design Unit to confirm if cored slabs can be used with concrete overlay. Design team to contact bike/ped group. 6 of 6