20111132 Ver 1_401 Application_20111211

Letter of Transmittal
S &ME Inc
9751 Southern Pine Blvd tS&ME
Charlotte NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
[phone] fax
N C Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop drawings
❑ Copy of letter
20111132
DATE Dec 19 2011
JOB NO 1357 11 032
ATTENTION Mr Ian McMillan
RE South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement
Project
® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Draft
® Report
COU RTESY
COFy
—the following items
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
Copy of Nationwide Permit No 12 and 18 Pre Construction Notification
1
12 19 2011
1
Jurisdictional Determination
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW
❑ For approval
❑ As requested
❑ FORBIDS DUE /
® For your record
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS Attached please find the above Note that the attached PCN is being provided for reference only, as the proposed
impacts are below DWQ notification thresholds Please let Isaac Hinson or myself know if you have questions Thank you
Dave Homans
SIGN
COPY TO File, USACE, CMSWS, NC SHPO, USFWS
DE(. D
9 2011
DENR WATER QUALITY
RS ANDSAND STORMWAiij VANCH
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE
This Letter of Transmittal and the documents accompanying this Letter of Transmittal contain information from S &ME Inc which is confidential and legally
privileged The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named on this Letter of Transmittal If you are not the intended recipient you
are hereby notified that any disclosure copying distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on these documents is strictly prohibited
S &ME SFG 001
(Rev 04/04)

1
� *S&ME
1 December 19 2011
' U S Army Corps g Co s of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville North Carolina 28801 5006
• Figures Site Vicinity (Figure 1) USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) USDA Soil
Survey Map (Figure 3) and Approximate Waters of the U S Map (Figure 4)
• Appendix I Pre Construction Notification Form (PCN)
• Appendix 11 CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Project 95%
Design Plans (including Jurisdictional Impact Mark up)
• Appendix IH Site Photographs
• Appendix IV Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form and
ISWE INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte NC 28273 5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smeinc corn
Attention Ms Amanda Jones
N C Division of Water Quality
'
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh North Carolina 27604
Attention Mr Ian McMillan
Reference Application for Nationwide Permit No 12 and 18 and
Request for Jurisdictional Determination
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Project
Charlotte North Carolina
S &ME Project No 1357 11 032
Dear Ms Jones and Mr McMillan
S &ME Inc (S &ME) is submitting this application for impacts to waters of the U S in
accordance with Department of the Army Nationwide Permit (NWP) No 12 (utility line
activities) and No 18 (minor discharges) along with supporting documentation for
verification of the on site jurisdictional boundaries S &ME has been retained by
Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) the applicant for the proposed
project to provide services related to authorization under the NWPs in accordance with
the Clean Water Act The proposed project will involve temporary disturbance to 40
linear feet (If) of stream for the placement of storm water siphon lines as well as
placement of less than 20 cubic yards (CY) of riprap below the ordinary high water mark
(OHWM) along 68 feet of stream bank for the construction of four stable storm water
BMP outfalls In support of this NWP authorization application please find enclosed the
following
• Figures Site Vicinity (Figure 1) USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) USDA Soil
Survey Map (Figure 3) and Approximate Waters of the U S Map (Figure 4)
• Appendix I Pre Construction Notification Form (PCN)
• Appendix 11 CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Project 95%
Design Plans (including Jurisdictional Impact Mark up)
• Appendix IH Site Photographs
• Appendix IV Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form and
ISWE INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte NC 28273 5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smeinc corn

Nationwide Permit No 12 &18 /Request for Jurisdictional Determination S &ME Project No 1357 11 032
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect December 19 2011
• Appendix V N C Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Stream Identification
' Forms and USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Wetland and Upland
Determination Forms
Copies of this PCN are being provided to DWQ for information purposes only as ;Impacts
associated with the proposed project fall below notification thresholds for Water Quality
Certifications No 3819 and 3821
' BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The project site is located on Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) South Park
' Campus which is located in Charlotte North Carolina between Runnymede Lane to the
south Colony Road to the east and Briar Creek to the north and west The project area
includes Alexander Graham Middle School Selwyn Elementary School and the southern
' portion of Myers Park High School The location of the project area is depicted on the
Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1) the appropriate portions of the Charlotte East, N C (1988)
USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) USDA Soil Survey Map (Figure 3) and a 2010
' aerial photograph which is included as the background for the Approximate Waters of the
US Map (Figure 4)
In order to improve downstream water quality and improve upon the current aging storm
water infrastructure on site CMSWS has proposed a multifaceted Watershed
Enhancement Project (WEP) An additional goal of the project is to provide water
quality educational opportunities for the many students and visitors to the campus This
will include the addition of permanent educational signage that will be incorporated into
the project as well as use of the proposed facilities as outdoor classrooms and amenities
for student projects and research As pre existing USGS stream monitoring stations are
located at the upstream and downstream end of the project area the project will serve as
an excellent testing facility to help determine the pollutant removal performance of the
' proposed storm water Best Management Practice (BMP) structures
The proposed project will involve construction at five separate Work Sites (WS I WS 3
WS 8 WS 10 and WS 15) throughout the project area (see Figure 4) Proposed project
components consist of a variety of storm water BMPs including bioretention basins
infiltration trenches swales dry ponds and an off line wet pond as well as the outfalls
outlets ditches forebays level spreaders and storm water inlets associated with these
structures Additionally a number of upgrades and tie ins to existing storm drain piping
will be constructed and outdated storm water outfall pipes will be removed
' In order to treat storm water from both sides of a stream running up the middle of the
project area (S1) with one off line wet pond installation of a siphon line under the stream
is proposed which will carry storm water from the north side of the stream to the wet
' pond on the south side Additionally in order to allow for stable transitions for storm
water into downstream jurisdictional waters riprap will be placed below the OWHM at
four BMP outfall locations

1
Nationwide Permit No 12818 /Request for Jurisdictional Determination SWE Project No 1357 11 032
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect December 19, 2011
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
'
On December l 2011 S &ME personnel visited the site and conducted a delineation to
determine the location of jurisdictional streams and wetlands within the project area The
determination was conducted utilizing currently accepted methods as set forth in the 1987
'
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Stream assessments were conducted
in accordance with DWQ and USACE guidelines Results of the determination are
depicted on the Approximate Waters of the U S Map (Figure 4) and representative
'
photographs of the project area are included in Appendix Ill
Field review of the project areas identified three jurisdictional relatively permanent
'
waters (S] S2 and S3) and one jurisdictional wetland (WA) adjacent to S1 S1 is a
relatively large (3`d order) perennially flowing tributary to Briar Creek (referred to as
Briar Creek Tributary #] by CMSWS) which flows from east to west along the project
'
area dividing the campus of Myers Park High School to the north from the campuses of
Alexander Graham Middle School and Selwyn Elementary School to the south (Photo 1)
S2 is a very small channel with geomorphic characteristics indicative of intermittent
'
seasonal flow (DWQ stream classification score of 20 5) which originates at a riprapped
storm water pipe outfall and flows south for approximately 85 feet before entering a
corrugated plastic culvert which flows into Sl (Photo 2) S3 is a small channel with
'
geomorphic conditions indicative of perennial flow (DWQ stream classification score of
32 5) which is located at the edge of the project area immediately adjacent to Colony
Road near its intersection with Runnymede Lane (Photo 3) WA is a very small
(approximately 0 01 acre) floodplain depression directly adjacent to S 1 Though
vegetation was absent within WA due to wintertime observations and its small area
conditions were consistent with those that would support sparse herbaceous wetland
'
vegetation during the growing season (Photo 4)
Upland areas consist predominantly of schools and associated out buildings parking
areas and maintained ball fields (Photos 11 and 12) A forested floodplain with multiple
'
sanitary sewer corridors was also present in the riparian area adjacent to S 1 (Photo 10)
Understory vegetation in the floodplain was frequently dominated by invasive vegetation
such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum smense) and Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackn)
'
Additionally four channels were identified down slope of existing storm water outfalls
(NJDI NJD4 Photos 5 8) These channels scored below 19 using DWQ stream
classification methodology as such they were considered to lack characteristics
'
consistent with relatively permanent waters and were thus considered non jurisdictional
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination form was prepared and incorporated with this
'
PCN for verification and is included in Appendix IV Completed DWQ Stream
Identification Forms are included in Appendix V along with Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Wetland Determination Forms characterizing WA and multiple upland data
points within the project area
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
The proposed project will involve temporary disturbance to 401f of stream due to
trenching and sediment and erosion control measures associated with the placement of
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I�
Nationwide Permit No 12818 /Request for Jurisdictional Determination SBME Project No 1357 11 032
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect December 19. 2011
the storm water siphon lines Additionally placement of less than 20 cubic yards (CY) of
riprap below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) along 68 feet of stream bank is
necessary for the construction of four stable storm water BMP outfalls Details of the
extent of impacts are included in Table 1 below Additionally the pertinent sheets from
the 95% Design Plans are included in Appendix 1 these sheets have been marked up to
clearly indicate the location of jurisdictional and non jurisdictional features as well as
the location of proposed impacts to jurisdictional features
Table 1 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
PROTECTED SPECIES AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Protected Species
S &ME s consideration of potential protected species habitat began with review of
existing records obtained from federal and state sources The U S Fish & Wildlife
Service (USFWS) list of federally protected species (updated May 10 2007) was
consulted for a listing of protected species documented within Mecklenburg County
North Carolina This review identified four protected species three plants and one
animal Listed flora and fauna and their federal status are identified in Table 2
Explanations of rankings are included at the end of the table
Table 2 Federally Protected Flora and Fauna Summary
Species
Design
County Status
Habitat Present
Ech►nacea laevigata
Area of
Work
Sheet
Impacted
No
Hehanthus schwe►n►tzu
LF of
CY of
impact
Area
(Appx I
Stream
Type of Impact
Source of Impact
impact
fill
(ft)
WS 15
20
S1
Temporary
Storm water siphon
40
800
Michaux s sumac
E
Historical
trenching
line crossing
WS 3
8
S2
Placement of fill
Riprap placement
10
<6 7
120
below OHWM
at storm pipe outfall
Riprap placement
WS 10
16
S1
Placement of fill
at bioretention
24
<7 2
130
below OHWM
basin outfall
Riprap placement
WS 15
20
S1
Placement of fill
at siphon junction
10
<2 1
38
below OHWM
box relief outfall
WS 15
19
S1
Placement of fill
Riprap placement
24
<4
72
below OHWM
at wet pond outfall
108
1-1160
<20
Totals
(0 03 ac
PROTECTED SPECIES AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Protected Species
S &ME s consideration of potential protected species habitat began with review of
existing records obtained from federal and state sources The U S Fish & Wildlife
Service (USFWS) list of federally protected species (updated May 10 2007) was
consulted for a listing of protected species documented within Mecklenburg County
North Carolina This review identified four protected species three plants and one
animal Listed flora and fauna and their federal status are identified in Table 2
Explanations of rankings are included at the end of the table
Table 2 Federally Protected Flora and Fauna Summary
Species
Federal Rank
County Status
Habitat Present
Ech►nacea laevigata
Smooth coneflower
E
Current
No
Hehanthus schwe►n►tzu
Schweinitz s sunflower
E
Current
No
Lasm►gona decorata
Carolina heelsplitter
E
Historical
No
Rhus m►chaux►►
Michaux s sumac
E
Historical
No
E = Endangered
4

1
17
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nationwide Permit No 12818 /Request for Jurisdictional Determination SWE Project No 1357 11 032
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect December 19, 2011
As part of the protected species review S &ME also consulted the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database Virtual
Workroom and Element Occurrence (EO) Database for a listing of endangered or
threatened species EOs within or near the project area This review found no EOs
pertaining to federally or state protected species on record within a two mile radius of the
project site
S &ME completed a field reconnaissance of the project site on December 1 2011 This
effort revealed the site consisted of forested floodplain areas and maintained lawns and
activity fields None of the three listed plant species were observed Based on the level
of recent and continued disturbance the project site was not considered to provide
potential habitat for protected terrestrial species with a likelihood of occurring in
Mecklenburg County
Though the Carolina heelsphtter is listed (historically) for Mecklenburg County the
proposed project involves impacts to unnamed tributaries to Briar Creek and will not
impact streams that drain to those supporting known populations of Carolina heelsplitter
or its designated critical habitat No documented occurrences of Carolina heelsplitter are
known for Briar Creek its tributaries or its receiving stream Little Sugar Creek
Accordingly the proposed project is not anticipated to impact this species or its
designated Critical Habitat
A copy of this PCN and attachments will also be provided to the USFWS for that
agency s comment on the proposed project
Cultural Resources
S &ME reviewed the North Carolina Historical Preservation Office Online GIS Web
Service (HPOWEB) for properties listed or potentially eligible for listing in the National
Register of Historic Places No such properties were located within the vicinity of the
project area The Isaac Newton Alexander Mill ruin a local historical landmark is
located approximately 150 feet outside of the project area along Briar Creek on the
campus of Myers Park High School The proposed project is on the other side of a
driveway and ridge from this historical resource and thus should have no adverse impact
on this structure
A copy of this PCN and attachments will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) to provide an opportunity for comment on the proposed project
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
To minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters all BMPs were designed off line of the
jurisdictional waters rather than in line as is often used for storm water BMPs The only
impacts to the bed of jurisdictional streams proposed are associated with the siphon line
crossing which was an engineering requirement in order to keep the proposed wet pond
off line from Sl while still allowing it to treat storm water from both sides of S1 This
impact should be considered temporary as the utility (siphon) lines will be placed below
the invert of the channel the stream will be returned to pre construction contours and no

Nationwide Permit No 12 &18 /Request for Jurisdictional Determination S &ME Project No 1357 11 032
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect December 19. 2011
permanent maintenance corridor will be required Proposed bank impacts have been
' limited to the minimum areas required by engineering standards to ensure stability at
outfall locations Additionally rtprap outfalls were generally located at either areas that
are currently impacted by storm water outfalls (Photo 13) or along banks that are
' currently experiencing bank instability (Photo 14) This minimizes disturbance by
utilizing rtprap placement for both outfall stabilization and general bank stabilization and
by terminating rtprap placement short of the normal flow line of the stream
'
Project area limits of disturbance were chosen to limit riparian impacts and to minimize
disturbance and removal of trees Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures
'
will be utilized during construction and to channel work will be performed to the dry
through the use of appropriate measures such as temporary coffer dams and stream water
'
pump arounds
' REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Rigorous sediment and erosion control measures will be employed during construction in
1
order to comply with the appropriate water quality standards These measures shall be
consistent with specifications governing their proper design installation operation and
maintenance as outlined in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and
'
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and approved by the local governing
authority Sediment and erosion control measures placed in waters will be removed and
the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land Resources has
'
released the project
The proposed utility line crossing has been designed at a near perpendicular angle to the
stream In channel work proposed at this crossing will be conducted to the dry
'
following completion of the crossing the trench will be backfilled and stream bed and
banks will be returned to their original contour Disturbed stream banks will be re
vegetated using a native wetland seed mix The proposed construction corridor will be
'
limited to less than 40 feet and no permanent maintenance corridor will be required
Impacts associated with this crossing have been avoided and minimized and appropriate
measures will be taken during construction to allow flow and circulation patterns of
waters of the U S to remain unaffected Discharge of fill material (rtprap) below the
OHWM of streams has been minimized to the extent practicable and will be well below
'
the 25 CY volume limit established as a part of NWP 18
Following construction temporarily disturbed upland areas will be restored to original
grade and elevation Excess material will be removed to a high ground disposal area
'
The proposed project will not result in additional impervious surface and no permanent
or temporary impacts to wetlands are anticipated
MITIGATION
The proposed project has been designed specifically for the purpose of improving the
ecological condition of downstream waters and will result in no loss of waters of the
U S Based on our experience with similar projects we do not anticipate that
compensatory mitigation for the proposed project is required Although the goal of
1

t
Nationwide Permit No 12818 /Request for Jurisdictional Determination SWE Project No 1357 11 032
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect December 19 2011
proposed project is enhancement of downstream waters CMSWS is not seeking
mitigation credit for this project
CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN we are requesting your written
concurrence with this request for authorization under NWP No 12 and NWP No 18 If
you have questions or require additional information please feel free to contact Isaac
Hinson at 704 336 4495
Sincerely
C
i
v L `
Isaac Hinson P W S D David Homans
Wetland Specialist Natural Resources Project Scientist
' Charlotte Storm Water Services S &ME
' Technical Review by Damn Peme Q E P
Senior Reviewed by M Neal McElveen P E
S &ME
tAttachments
cc Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
U S Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville Field Office
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
FIGURES
• Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map
• Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map
• Figure 3 - USDA Soil Survey Map
• Figure 4 - Approximate Waters of the U S Map

r Norris Ave
16i
/ 3 1 s Odk�d
�d 276 1 kn F
isso ee9ee o X
�JOKa 66 1662 y 2540 29 �Ljd �S
.°: the 3r
27 State St 2074 29 S
o'
tee 29 gIle
7 010 01?
Z74 Charlotte
�
p4� 4
10"
C
° 27,1 h01 h St
O k Central Ave
27 27
St��Jd (1��60 160 27 F 74
�1 ,tte 'P
X124 125 160 �0 49 s
eV, G�f 1d c 16 •Q
to � Sf � Qy d,
!160' 0 1� J Oo 1009
C did deal wa °' 'A
Y x Y a
i Mecklenbur9 n�Oh s6 a
C O'•u n t y Ra �O 16
1177 ejiiy G�ah ' a9 d, s6 �
�L Bm pkY CdjP Qa
Tye m y6d, Z C
o/d
.pa c Ay �s;de q C° tea
o0 5 to ve o,e
Woodlawn Rd u' Pia
C j !P s
has i
,� C S'U�� - C 16
401 [0
1155 CO
r U) yv01e
Rd ye o
so m
49 ih�64 Archdale Dr e
4J Z t' Fa �rVie
N 3687 W
`o o Rd Fairview Rd
13 N
Q�G�lb Q� 3673 Sharon View Rd
o
Cl) 3611
1138 3611
SU L 41 2�
to
Project Location ee� 5ra o of 0
/
C o
o
REFERENCE: i O
THE ABOVE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE ESRI STREETMAP NORTH AMERICA DATASET PLEASE NOTE THIS (f X0.5 1 U a1.5
MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE 01
ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. SBME,INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR Miles
ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
SCALE: AS SHOWN SITE VICINITY FIGURE
DATE: 12 -7 -2011 CMS South Park Campus No
#S&ME DRAWN BY: DDH Watershed Enhancement Project
WWW.SMEINC.COM Charlotte, North Carolina
LHECKED BY: JoL PROJECT NO:
� 1357 -11 -032

r '@� ;'� ply - mss` A��, y� n'.
� �' �ly "� �°•�; ' a�-i I'll Bens Rd West •� �'h � �.s �, i I V �.
'Oe 4 „ �7od Dr �v ! , aQ { f3
a r s_ i �`a -ti �,� `Ster • -� s, j +� ,r. -;. '�' � � MYerIY1P�° ��'?
ti]g ty� R � �9�d =_' 1 �apnj * J_ ! s "rondonC� ,} I(
?w° t �. i B
° c r i O,.
l �ty� �t�A 4!''�S` lrQ' L: Ju / y 'a� Al•i yr` Y.',.
°i ti, P •�, � � Lorene a �i\ _ L• �; • °� i" L.1'
� Qla1i '� nq° `' er de ' ' ri
r op_p � 1' i /,9�! � Pets r ^' � I
Reef r.:. - q r ¢' Y �t 1 1 + adP\
::
Rocklyn.Pl twa /eS. Q m �, r • , �0ei
FIeIdPl CN e r f a ac ` - "�
,r I � �° `� °oar , � bnY d a „� '
d ,
Manor R Brandywine Rd W j f t / Cdr °�
r U1M�,: !nd! Wood 0 1 \ .r , 15 `C
ii` a i` �,
�� Hassell PI �'' ' '"'"`� .. -^" '
TMontFota' �oodlawnRd �5 r. ,3 I r� a, ,,
a a ;a�
G aid Dr r:. y -
'.s :gym � ,� � .r- � I �,.
�� {rim � � � .O' � � mow! _� .. 'r
h a�,
ti.f v' a Mich ";� �,L �1broo 4,�
�'\ r, ,F ael aak = r ' . R k 0
� `� - 4 V
} \ r 9,r.,, h 1 IfF �l i.t'¢,M� �I C
"' �; Mal f , 5� i' `ty �� M / ~� i r t `;
,y r a Ymede -L'n� - l
aorl �' - �� w�
' . y -V �? f r e:Rd �_ -fir • ' � o�ElRd a�* o
m� t • !
r� r 4 a� �� w 1� ��
�Sbo awe * n a s :�
1� a °a?:Cl r `'� f j ti` ..,: y'�Clarend °n Rd f �Lheelock Rd
h `
s • �r! f. � i, er�e� � �� � - °'' kl �` . � le \dRd � t`
!� Q r s R. �- ti" Q LG�OVett Rd�
{ /, ��J�%
� r
y
i
1 r ,II 2� y .. " a .y. r:
_ ll��jr� f J U
*w ,i frl j '. °c °J � �. � N� � � ��(P` �'Q� "ick,`e� am Rd %3'' w
>r',:` J �,. �vpc:. .� -•' ..` Inmaan Rd ,�/ Richards ..
r : r cco9 ,\ a , _� D
��: °rya y � � t J ��.
•A K m ^ /y +� r � ' , 1 ' -� • .� a � - f;
Project Area u po, _ �d '' l �` :,�.
it .:a• gay 1N�/�exf° \ ti;
REFERENCE: USGS 1988 CHARLOTTE, EAST [NC] QUAD SHEET f*'r i =�
Sharon /Township,
FORLNFOORMAT ONAL PUR OSES ONLYEIIT S NOT MEANTDFOR DES GN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. TTHERE ARE NO °v� Rd `'
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &M E, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE ORANY - 0. +,°Ot 500 1 ,000 - 1',500
r(
�� ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet
SCALE: 1 = 1,000' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE
DATE: 12 -7 -2011 �� CMS South Park Campus No
DRAWN BY: DDH ^-s= S& Watershed Enhancement Project
YYWW.SMEINC.COM Charlotte, North Carolina 2
CHECKED BY: �DL PROJECTNO: I
1357 -11 -032

W
MkB
MkB
WuD //� MO U � E
MeD
MO
WkE
w1iCuD
W EI
—_aw.
MS
1
EnD
Cu ID
Project Area
Cu D: Cecil -Urban land complex, 8 -15% slopes
En B: Enon sandy loam, 2 -8% slopes
En D: Enon sandy loam, 8 -15% slopes
MS: Monacan and Arents soils
Ga�end °n Rd
MeB: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 -8% slopes
MeD: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 -15% slopes
c MkB: Mecklenburg -Urban land complex, 2 -8% slopes
o, �C\°verfe�dRd
WkE: Wilkes loam, 15 -25% slopes
+
f
REFERENCE: USDA SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATA SET
THE ABOVE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE USDA GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS U
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN. LEGAL, ORANY OTHER
USES. THEREARE NO O 2SO 5OO
75O
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY S &MEC. , IN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FORANY DECISION
MADE OR ANY
ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
Feet
SCALE: 1" = 500'
USDA SOIL SURVEY MAP
CMS South Park Campus
FIGURF
N0
DATE:
12 -7 -2011
#S&ME
Watershed Enhancement Project
DRAWN BY: ppH
WWW.SMEINC.COM
Charlotte, North Carolina
CHECKED BY: �oL
�
PROJECT NO: 1357-11 -03 2

MW .l9 03NOSHO WOO'ON13WS'MMM
Hdd- ZEO-46-LS£6 3WWSAS NMb'8( :ON lO3fOad #
mz cz -�L :31H4 SON = .,Z :31VOS
Lu=wU)
w� WLL
LU � Uj C,
a�zz
2 W ' O
CO) O z _
z J O
Z a W z W
Oz
o2�Q
zoFU�
(Do Z) N Z) L _
U) O H
= O } °}
LLJ ¢pW U �
¢p
0 >- t y!�
zz
pO7�W
U
CO Ir U7 z
Qa�CDW F
zw,zm
U S` W J F
(n m W *.
U 0 H ¢ LU
w 0 FD �
C, LL W W mw0 ,11
W
U
z? UQ]—
J !n LL
• o1o�Y' "
1-� P :. F
1 1,
♦1♦ ----
*
Q Lu Z } Q
�
1•
11111 00
ij
O
•
I
P. Z co E U
N
;
ffE! f4d =
1:41 kpi ' � co
L �
t
z 3 co c
C
N
M
' ■
X
CL
a
•
0 t6��itt.
p
■
■
Q
N O
■
1
w
O
N
• 5
�
•
N
■ �
N C
•
fts
O
3fj)
L
� ■_��
��..
i)
Z
�.
oil
U)
W, ,a � R- � I � � �' � I � (IMR/W I � �� \ i A--
t Mkt
X
W O.
Q
w
N O
m z Ln
AIL R
L ° L
4! O U)
r N
4.a ' 1z
to
r0
_
AN- ♦ k
♦ �._
N M
M C —
O N N
_ L
Q U
@
zl?
N �
c N
0L O U
Z w Z
-o
C
m nzo
N
<I
U
a�
N
O
LL
:-
a
Of
—H5
U) 'c
N
a
N �
c c
O (0
r
U o
q-P N f0 (n
Z 7 Vic!
O L
Z U
W Z
N U�
<6 C In
C C
O (6 dj
C, N @U
zDE3:
c c p
Z aU
w Z
VNIIObIVO Hi8ON '3110lbWHO
103fObd 1N3W30NVHN3 a3HS2]31b'M o
sndVYVO N8Vd H1f10S SW0 z
ui
ddW •S ■f1 3H1 :10
SM31VM 31VWIXOHddV
U �
C O
O O
u
�O U O
c
O
Q C
'C U O
= O O 7 N 73
O d C L N
O 7
a cu E z
m 2 J
Q
cc cc
a) C
Q N @ O
Q �. (D m
U C E
r- m Y m 1= a�
O Q O N Q N >
a S N w S m U
■■
E
: ■..o�U)
■
■
_
• o1o�Y' "
X
Q
SZ
�
Q
r Q
O
m o
d
N
;
ffE! f4d =
1:41 kpi ' � co
L �
LO.
°
a.
C
N
M
L
O
0 t6��itt.
p
N O
.<
c.
3
�� W
tE t�4'
� ■_��
Z
�.
■ tx
Z
W, ,a � R- � I � � �' � I � (IMR/W I � �� \ i A--
t Mkt
X
W O.
Q
w
N O
m z Ln
AIL R
L ° L
4! O U)
r N
4.a ' 1z
to
r0
_
AN- ♦ k
♦ �._
N M
M C —
O N N
_ L
Q U
@
zl?
N �
c N
0L O U
Z w Z
-o
C
m nzo
N
<I
U
a�
N
O
LL
:-
a
Of
—H5
U) 'c
N
a
N �
c c
O (0
r
U o
q-P N f0 (n
Z 7 Vic!
O L
Z U
W Z
N U�
<6 C In
C C
O (6 dj
C, N @U
zDE3:
c c p
Z aU
w Z
VNIIObIVO Hi8ON '3110lbWHO
103fObd 1N3W30NVHN3 a3HS2]31b'M o
sndVYVO N8Vd H1f10S SW0 z
ui
ddW •S ■f1 3H1 :10
SM31VM 31VWIXOHddV
U �
C O
O O
u
�O U O
c
O
Q C
'C U O
= O O 7 N 73
O d C L N
O 7
a cu E z
m 2 J
Q
cc cc
a) C
Q N @ O
Q �. (D m
U C E
r- m Y m 1= a�
O Q O N Q N >
a S N w S m U
■■
E
: ■..o�U)
■
■
_
• o1o�Y' "
X
Q
SZ
�
Q
r Q
O
m o
O
r �
N
�
U
(0
N
L �
LO.
O N
�! L
C
N
M
1`
771-1e
X
Q
CL
Q
O
N
r �
f!1 c
Y �
L �
0
N
N
O
L
U)
N
N
N Lq
m c co
c c �-
O L
N.�U o
QI N U
Z � N
Ci
p L Q
ZLyajU
Z
m m m= A == i m i r = == m
w
U)
LL
O U)
U) J ¢
~ ¢ U
O ?
J F -
W
O a
O O
Z Z T
W Q
�O(r
g N U
0— U
LL a U)
o g r
Z N
= O
mwQ
O D U
LU z W
LLI
3 (Q0 z
J ¢
�a�
06 CD
Z z O
z
O O w
�Z¢
w w
LL W W
y ZO ? F
F O
� Z
W
O W W W
Z (n Y
Om�umW
US-W
as =°
O U z
J W ¢
1~i Om0
N Z N
w Q
11� W
O = W w
N F N J
Z Z
=O O
_U
O w O
-Z
Om
xooz
IL U W w
J ¢ Q w
o O
W O w Z
¢_ U)
p d W F
J O
W
N K 3 J
W W W Z
V ¢ U O
W >mw
o:mmm
Lu <
LL
LL W F K
� F o a
X
SZ
Q
O
O
r �
Y
�
U
(0
L �
N
L
O
1`
771-1e
X
Q
CL
Q
O
N
r �
f!1 c
Y �
L �
0
N
N
O
L
U)
N
N
N Lq
m c co
c c �-
O L
N.�U o
QI N U
Z � N
Ci
p L Q
ZLyajU
Z
m m m= A == i m i r = == m
w
U)
LL
O U)
U) J ¢
~ ¢ U
O ?
J F -
W
O a
O O
Z Z T
W Q
�O(r
g N U
0— U
LL a U)
o g r
Z N
= O
mwQ
O D U
LU z W
LLI
3 (Q0 z
J ¢
�a�
06 CD
Z z O
z
O O w
�Z¢
w w
LL W W
y ZO ? F
F O
� Z
W
O W W W
Z (n Y
Om�umW
US-W
as =°
O U z
J W ¢
1~i Om0
N Z N
w Q
11� W
O = W w
N F N J
Z Z
=O O
_U
O w O
-Z
Om
xooz
IL U W w
J ¢ Q w
o O
W O w Z
¢_ U)
p d W F
J O
W
N K 3 J
W W W Z
V ¢ U O
W >mw
o:mmm
Lu <
LL
LL W F K
� F o a

1
1
1
1
11
APPENDIX 1
1 • Pre - Construction Notification
1
1
1
1
1
11

1
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
t
W A Trf OG
h
% y
2 0 1 1 1 1 3 2
o�ot
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification C Form
A Appli cant Information
g
1
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 and 18 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
TO Yes
®No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
TO Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Project
2b
County
Mecklenburg D
IC-1 I
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Charlotte
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
DEL 2 9
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
N/A
DENR WATER QUALITY
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Charlotte Mecklenburg School System
3b
Deed Book and Page No
N/A
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
N/A
3d
Street address
N/A
3e
City state zip
N/A
3f
Telephone no
N/A
3g
Fax no
N/A
3h
Email address
N/A
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

t
1
1
iJ
1
1
�I
1
1
1
1
1
Fj
LI
1
1
1
4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other specify Public Stormwater Utility
4b
Name
Isaac Hinson PWS
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d
Street address
600 East Fourth Street
4e
City state zip
Charlotte NC 28202
4f
Telephone no
704 336 -4495
4g
Fax no
704 336 6586
4h
Email address
ihmson @ci charlotte nc us
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
D David Homans
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
S &ME Inc
5c
Street address
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
5d
City state zip
Charlotte NC 28273
5e
Telephone no
704 523 4726
5f
Fax no
704 525 3953
5g
Email address
dhomans @smeinc com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

1
t
1
1
1
1
t
fl
1
I
t
t
r
B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
17507101 17507102
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 1692 Longitude 808361
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
Project review area -66 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
Stream S1 is a direct tributary to Briar Creek (Briar Creek
proposed project
Trib #1)
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Brier (sic) Creek Class C
2c
River basin
Catawba /Santee
3
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project site consists of Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) South Park Campus (Myers Park High School
Alexander Graham Middle School and Selwyn Elementary School) This includes schools and associated out buildings
parking areas and maintained ball fields A moderate sized stream (S1) with a forested floodplain and riparian area flows
between Myers Park High to the north and Alexander Graham Middle School and Selwyn Elementary School to the
South Sanitary sewer lines are also present within this riparian corridor Invasive vegetation (particularly Amur
honeysuckle and Chinese privet) has proliferated in the understory of forested areas within the project area The general
vicinity of the project area is made up almost entirely or moderately high density residential development with a few areas
of medium density commercial development
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 01 acres
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
3 112 LF
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is to retrofit CMS South Park Campus with a multiple storm water management best
management practice structures (BMPs) to improve downstream water quality and improve upon the current aging storm
water infrastructure
An additional goal of the project is to provide water quality educational opportunities for the many students and visitors to
the campus In addition to the permanent educational signage that will be incorporated into the project the facilities will
serve as outdoor classrooms and amenities for student projects and research
3e
Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
Construction will occur at five separate Work Sites (WS) (WS 1 WS 3 WS 8 WS 10 and WS 15) throughout the project
area Construction involves the excavation and construction of a number of BMPs including bioretention basins
infiltration trenches swales dry ponds and an off line wet pond as well as the associated outfalls outlets ditches
forebays level spreaders and inlets A number of upgrades and tie ins to existing storm sewer piping will also be
constructed and old storm water outfalls pipes will be removed
In order to treat stormwater from both sides of stream S1 with one off line wet pond installation of a siphon line under the
stream is proposed to carry storm water from the north side of the stream to the wet pond on the south side This will
involve temporarily trenching S1 while in the dry installing the pipe and then backfilimg the trench and returning the
stream bed and banks to their original contour Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters will be limited to placement of
nprap below the OWHM at four BMP outfall locations
Equipment likely to be used includes industry standard trackhoes dozers trucks and excavators
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

1
1
1
J
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
C
4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Request for verification is included with this
application
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
of determination was made?
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company
Other
4d
If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b
If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project? --FE]
Yes No
6b
If yes explain
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

t
L
I
t
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

r
t
� I
0
t
I
1
�J
J
t
1
1
1
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404 other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
2h Comments No wetlands impacts are located within the project area
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Treching to install
siphon line (WS
S1
® PER
® Corps
20
40 LF
15)
E:1 INT
DWQ
S2 ®P ❑ T
Outfall nprap
placement at
S2
❑ PER
® Corps
4
10 LF
( <6 7 CY
WS 3
INT
®DWQ
of fill)
S3 ®P ❑ T
Outfall riprap
placement at
S1
® PER
® Corps
20
24 LF on
left bank
WS 10
❑ INT
® DWQ
( <7 2 CY
of fill)
S4 ®P ❑ T
Siphon box outfall
nprap placement
S1
® PER
® Corps
20
10 LF on
right bank
at WS 15
❑ INT
® DWQ
( <2 1 CY
of fill)
S5 ®P ❑ T
Wet pond outfall
nprap placement
S1
® PER
® Corps
20
24 LF on
left bank
at WS 15
INT
DWQ
( <4 0 CY
of fill)
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
El PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
68 bank
feet perm
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
40 LF
temp
( <20 CY
of fill
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

1
J
1
F�
n
1
1
t
1
1
t
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
placed
below
OHWM)
31 Comments In compliance with NWP 18 less than 25 cubic yards (CY) of fill is proposed to be placed below the OHWM
As this is placed in a thickness of 15 feet the area of fill is <360 f A2 or 0 008 acres well under the 1 /10th of an acre limitation
for NWP 18 As there are no permanent impacts or wetland vegetation conversion proposed at the siphon line crossing the
proposed project is below the notification thresholds for both NWP 12 and WQC 3819 Additionally in compliance with WQC
3819 the proposed crossing is near perpendicular to the stream and all in stream construction work will be performed in the
dry
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments No open waters are located within the project area
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
517 Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

t
1
1
1
I
1
ii
i
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
To minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters all BMPs were designed off line of the jurisdictional waters rather than in line as
is often used for storm water BMPs The only impacts to the bed of jurisdictional streams proposed are associated with the
siphon line crossing which was an engineering requirement in order to keep the proposed wet pond off line from S1 while still
allowing it to treat storm water from both sides of S1 This impact should be considered temporary as the channel will be
restored to pre construction contours and no permanent maintenance corridor will be required Bank impacts were limited to
the minimum areas required to ensure stability at outfall locations and nprap placement will terminate above the base flow line
of the receiving stream where possible Riprap outfalls were generally located at banks that are currently experiencing bank
instability in order to utilize nprap placement for both outfall stabilization and general bank stabilization
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Project area limits of disturbance were chosen to limit riparian impacts and to minimize disturbance to trees Appropriate
sediment and erosion control measures will be utilized during construction and in channel work will be done in the dry
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in lieu fee program
projects
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

I
1
1
1
�II
J
1
1
1
fl
t
1
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

1
t
1
Ll
1
1
1
L�
1
1
E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes No
❑
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why The proposed project is a watershed
enhancement project with the explicit goal of enhancing stormwater management as
such it does not require a separate
Stormwater Management Plan
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

t
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
The project is not a growth inducing project
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
The proposed project will not generate wastewater
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

1
1
1
1
1
F1
t
I�
1
I�
L�
5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat'7
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
® Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field review of the project area did not indicate the presence of habitat or endangered species listed for Mecklenburg
County The project area and vicinity are not located in a Designated Critical Habitat Review of Element Occurrences
on the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Virtual Workroom found that
there were no recorded occurrences of federally listed species within a two mile radius of the project area
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http Hocean flondamarine org /efh_coralhms /viewer htm
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The North Carolina Historical Preservation Office Online GIS Web Service (HPOWEB) indicated that no properties listed
or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places were located within the vicinity of the project
area The Isaac Newton Alexander Mill ruin a locally significant historical landmark is located approximately 150 feet
outside of the project area along Briar Creek on the campus of Myers Park High School The proposed project is on the
other side of a driveway and ridge from this historical resource and should have no adverse impact on this structure
Additionally a copy of this PCN will be provided to SHPO for comment
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain? —70
—yes ❑ No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements The project activities are being undertaken by the local agency
responsible for flood control and the activities proposed are covered under local flood control general permits
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http / /polaris mecklenburgcountync gov
Isaac Hinson PWS''
3 04 2010
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent s Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

p,
1
1
t
J
1
1
1
1
1
is provided
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

�I
1
1
I JAPPENDIX 11
• CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Project
95% Design Plans (Including Jurisdictional Impact Mark -up)
1
IF�
u
1
1

Mo1y a1�R1NNNNdW iwNpNe4
�.�
wV.rnJ'w+SIWrBRii •
pa,s aaa sss Ia
I`% Ilnnhlprr
• V �Z i
}O.
Ny •,L S
l. •..... `.�
�'',rlrr o `LQ
nNno• s6
3LVa
ABO3AONddtl
Ausva�olill�i�IOrs
T•�.I.IS•
LS
A849)CY911J
NN'J
AB O3Ntld38d
KLVd 310 GY3
ZJ3fU7Id
IKzw3jIKvHN3 GaRsa vm
SfiawyaXlIVdHiflos -SINK
S
.L33W
M. �asNYla�iGS \sNVld\NDS;p\toceol \s1�3'ow\1
3TIFN
S318NA.
ON"
19M.
a
z
o
¢N_
O
= o
m
V
N
H
oN
N
K
O
= O
11!11+
<+= y3 ¢� ° 8'6d° > ><z3WS <° Nrn °_ 11 / / J SDE
ZZW Fill Q m0 }z ~j _SK aiC NO, m.W �' i �/
< Z° Om Od yl iJ <W < W < F / X a�' z ! / /� \�
mypU'�{ F- 1- LL yaK�; F_ vl 7� �O� W X< W�O F4 ��I /m / F / /33 �v — \\ ✓hi
K UOiy UO� aJ " IIy�O� ~ c~i�=Ow F §/ �ma� I / N m /�f i
C�s�Zi ¢ na.� �m I!. N�tlNyy' Ji/
�y� '� �/ NW /�� �'� � �a�l'! • / <�� �,� �igr/ � / '.
�W���
ff�a� ySt3ow ypp ��2 y y I 1 (Q
•� ��{� a�W py F��VI ~1/� "�M♦��`1 r!! I ! J
0- �� W � jl�< prcm a Nf� 111 I I I f
tt�� rc qq ci rr
d�v�i36 ri F��3t3� Nf� ae�76 1: /� � 111! ! � l / V 9 •.
1 1
\} n o
3 ° /3V _� _s�I I4 Ui
�l t3go
3Y ! I �} Z Z
I o {
a- < 94 '
Wy
<�i5 Z�' � I O Ip�i� $pZ< IS�.pgfD � xirl -� /� f � �- • :1.1
N<- Lq 1 W
r jKgaW fFSVE6iEE�I�, ®� ®� Z Vi"L .,W �. Rip
i7( I I\,
! 1
_ 1 1
001 1
638 / t' t •,'
/ i \
as
as
\>
U�W ♦ z 1 /
.I 6N
G►
BEN
0-
F- y s
I` o I� '
f 01
.q
S
N
F
U
X
2
vix
/
634
X
k
m
0m
k
k
k x
k
�\
W
33
PI 0
k X
r
k
x, X
e
a
z
o
¢N_
O
= o
m
V
N
H
oN
N
K
O
= O
11!11+
<+= y3 ¢� ° 8'6d° > ><z3WS <° Nrn °_ 11 / / J SDE
ZZW Fill Q m0 }z ~j _SK aiC NO, m.W �' i �/
< Z° Om Od yl iJ <W < W < F / X a�' z ! / /� \�
mypU'�{ F- 1- LL yaK�; F_ vl 7� �O� W X< W�O F4 ��I /m / F / /33 �v — \\ ✓hi
K UOiy UO� aJ " IIy�O� ~ c~i�=Ow F §/ �ma� I / N m /�f i
C�s�Zi ¢ na.� �m I!. N�tlNyy' Ji/
�y� '� �/ NW /�� �'� � �a�l'! • / <�� �,� �igr/ � / '.
�W���
ff�a� ySt3ow ypp ��2 y y I 1 (Q
•� ��{� a�W py F��VI ~1/� "�M♦��`1 r!! I ! J
0- �� W � jl�< prcm a Nf� 111 I I I f
tt�� rc qq ci rr
d�v�i36 ri F��3t3� Nf� ae�76 1: /� � 111! ! � l / V 9 •.
1 1
\} n o
3 ° /3V _� _s�I I4 Ui
�l t3go
3Y ! I �} Z Z
I o {
a- < 94 '
Wy
<�i5 Z�' � I O Ip�i� $pZ< IS�.pgfD � xirl -� /� f � �- • :1.1
N<- Lq 1 W
r jKgaW fFSVE6iEE�I�, ®� ®� Z Vi"L .,W �. Rip
i7( I I\,
! 1
_ 1 1
001 1
638 / t' t •,'
/ i \
as
as
\>
U�W ♦ z 1 /
.I 6N
G►
BEN
0-
F- y s
I` o I� '
f 01
k k
k
k
F
X
�N
k x
x
X
k
m
0m
k
k
k x
k
k X
m
3
k
x, X
e
X
�
k
Y
g�
ko r
k
o
�•
k x
k k
X
x
a
z
o
¢N_
O
= o
m
V
N
H
oN
N
K
O
= O
11!11+
<+= y3 ¢� ° 8'6d° > ><z3WS <° Nrn °_ 11 / / J SDE
ZZW Fill Q m0 }z ~j _SK aiC NO, m.W �' i �/
< Z° Om Od yl iJ <W < W < F / X a�' z ! / /� \�
mypU'�{ F- 1- LL yaK�; F_ vl 7� �O� W X< W�O F4 ��I /m / F / /33 �v — \\ ✓hi
K UOiy UO� aJ " IIy�O� ~ c~i�=Ow F §/ �ma� I / N m /�f i
C�s�Zi ¢ na.� �m I!. N�tlNyy' Ji/
�y� '� �/ NW /�� �'� � �a�l'! • / <�� �,� �igr/ � / '.
�W���
ff�a� ySt3ow ypp ��2 y y I 1 (Q
•� ��{� a�W py F��VI ~1/� "�M♦��`1 r!! I ! J
0- �� W � jl�< prcm a Nf� 111 I I I f
tt�� rc qq ci rr
d�v�i36 ri F��3t3� Nf� ae�76 1: /� � 111! ! � l / V 9 •.
1 1
\} n o
3 ° /3V _� _s�I I4 Ui
�l t3go
3Y ! I �} Z Z
I o {
a- < 94 '
Wy
<�i5 Z�' � I O Ip�i� $pZ< IS�.pgfD � xirl -� /� f � �- • :1.1
N<- Lq 1 W
r jKgaW fFSVE6iEE�I�, ®� ®� Z Vi"L .,W �. Rip
i7( I I\,
! 1
_ 1 1
001 1
638 / t' t •,'
/ i \
as
as
\>
U�W ♦ z 1 /
.I 6N
G►
BEN
0-
F- y s
I` o I� '
f 01

.aw'wwron wumm a
„�°`�°'°
InR ON'sa�n
M4tl.puq wW64Mvl0➢n
'TM'd1�1P �l.�.l PY911
:. R paai a�
111 1119
O ,,�Hmm�rhrq
ILJ p.
S P\' •• • 'P��
1�••. �W •y _
Z• Z
:s - •�o�.-
,rd :, s
',.oy •..• •,•�.�e. ,L
A
''- •.,,,,r,,,,OO os6 4M
31vp
-
Ww /.
"g o'o"'"
31VMS SSVHf) aZJAiVHx3
E3.LI$
LS
.�0
AB 03M.73xJ
NIYJ
L_��Wd W
xlva371davJ
ZNaII�NVHN3 Q3HStId.LVM
snal�va x�IVd HZnos sia)
g
133xS
�
�aswvw- xsa \sNVid\wa3o\�ncca� \si�3r'oad��i
twos
—a,�—
ON 0Df
,g m
o
I
/
/s
' O O. I
° R.
a O
F C
—
tt - Sa
€off
A Zp Z $��jm <Zy
. � O 7�WO02 �•f � W � /
i3 V M I 6_. gi
p/ J
_ _,
r�
C
a
I _
F2 N I 2W U <O no W F r � HCf Kr,
i o o g mh m � �F
i 'Pdt�°DY I "i5' I 7 SS bJ' m'D n ��mm K r ilXF �QAL� ao $� Z Q.
Qs II
CL
I
II
I
I
II
II
I I.
II
\ V
\ I
II
\ I
I
\ 1
I
I
\ I
CN "gg $ o < 8 � b i � N
ao < }Qz
zI I 0O a0 m oN
��
~ �a yN� ¢r
V)
r z
N I I I ��J r�r � ��x �. � � � ` � O
\� I 1 1 D as/ I SOS %o� i �, `�W�� $�b� ?±n - ri F— 0 (/) $S
!6tpt + U=J:
W W
W W
_ V)
Lij V)
I � f— W
305 /0a, 3aS /a0, -- 3CS /a�\ /00-1 W
asst S` r —, � 2uj
-
cr-� ppmnmm�\ II I .onyL�� I
1, O O, ' q\ , II N N h- I I z
�o: �r>z� I � u co m'Io I � I o z_
za_>? \ I I 1zlzorj F °
z u I PPP
I, I
I{ I 41 r
\ \ �I �V III 11 I I I II 111 1 1 I "t
W I
3100 r +l
op
1jo I m
I) I IIM L e i 11 I,
� I I I 11 I M I I 1 I II
' S 4 I I'I I I I I It i I II I tl I i
I19
1 ,
all I�It
\ SDE /e
SDE /e
w
\ Q
N
r o I " <�
o DOl
0
J F- /a5
�.f
\ Z d-•r '011
C / /
bi r o V)
C Q
Ld
C_ /
Ld
ui y— a
0 E2
-� lie /
CL
Q V
W
N F m Z 30S I ;SI I Imo'
rc — w +w
-.J 144 LF 24 Ra
_ -
Q SDE /e
J
T �\
+
8
w
Qy I�1 q_
�,1
111 1119
P.z_�8`
r"�k'tp w
v
VWj
N
0
1Q-
o
N
�
O
o
CN "gg $ o < 8 � b i � N
ao < }Qz
zI I 0O a0 m oN
��
~ �a yN� ¢r
V)
r z
N I I I ��J r�r � ��x �. � � � ` � O
\� I 1 1 D as/ I SOS %o� i �, `�W�� $�b� ?±n - ri F— 0 (/) $S
!6tpt + U=J:
W W
W W
_ V)
Lij V)
I � f— W
305 /0a, 3aS /a0, -- 3CS /a�\ /00-1 W
asst S` r —, � 2uj
-
cr-� ppmnmm�\ II I .onyL�� I
1, O O, ' q\ , II N N h- I I z
�o: �r>z� I � u co m'Io I � I o z_
za_>? \ I I 1zlzorj F °
z u I PPP
I, I
I{ I 41 r
\ \ �I �V III 11 I I I II 111 1 1 I "t
W I
3100 r +l
op
1jo I m
I) I IIM L e i 11 I,
� I I I 11 I M I I 1 I II
' S 4 I I'I I I I I It i I II I tl I i
I19
1 ,
all I�It
\ SDE /e
SDE /e
w
\ Q
N
r o I " <�
o DOl
0
J F- /a5
�.f
\ Z d-•r '011
C / /
bi r o V)
C Q
Ld
C_ /
Ld
ui y— a
0 E2
-� lie /
CL
Q V
W
N F m Z 30S I ;SI I Imo'
rc — w +w
-.J 144 LF 24 Ra
_ -
Q SDE /e
J
T �\
+
8
w
Qy I�1 q_
�,1
� ��_I
LOD /SDE—
�I �, I, '�; � ► i f� � \� � 1, I
m m m m m m m
111 1119
P.z_�8`
r"�k'tp w
v
VWj
� ��_I
LOD /SDE—
�I �, I, '�; � ► i f� � \� � 1, I
m m m m m m m
o —
e
I a
l A1lr jj
I � U) I '
`I 0 I io
i
I I / ItY,
i
//
.r
I�o��a Ir
m m m m m m m m m s m m
pNHy, E
r"�k'tp w
v
4
�9
8 �
I
oo,
i
a 2/001
I
1
o —
e
I a
l A1lr jj
I � U) I '
`I 0 I io
i
I I / ItY,
i
//
.r
I�o��a Ir
m m m m m m m m m s m m

uxc JU'wa�W •
..w��w..iuwa�t onr -
s e paaT�aaa cuss
n ...,.
�/ �. :v'rJ ��i
S
yt
:z':
VIV,
',,y.,.,, ... �\ os ,LOA T
I.va
„r�ro
A U3AO aaI
- ��� -
unma axvs auv
nVI' =uOA aHOa A4a
NOI.LVMEKOO S 2.LIS
YS
A9113NJ3HJ
xNJ
A9 (13NYd3Ud
Nd
wvaa�ldOvO
aNas n w -xts\s n wvx isw\ eceo, \uarow\
ZORroull
yN3WHONVHN3 aHHSH31VM
snawvo x�IVa H,Lnos -sl�a
i I
y33
31vosoH
S31HV�
eor
L"-'
V I ' >Y✓
� I
"t
\ I
�O
Q > y
y�y p
FFi ? F WLF�d (A ppWy 1-
4 '5P W S 3 E <
a�
Wb y 20 .01 °1 �
�35N
5,80L 8o 5 °
251, W
mz
Z y� ypp1, 4,,1 K �f yCfF
goo S i'a mob4 j�= vrzpd�� ZZ<�F t�i� bW cFiCL
O?2 G �ZO F t�$�� OV fF/1 rn OJ
m „zgy vZZ��
< ?kVr� O�x< i �c# zo
�W$ °gyp gas 3 Q3i`o1� �fY ~� _
Ap5,A ZI .9
<�za
Shy -Im~ Fy alK�lz �A�S wzz �crl 0.iii rl
� a ai .t 4R m6F? Off? peg sm at 3
!r
r
w
PC
o,
CL=
o
�I Z
�o
ae
go 1
1
m
\ j
8
1
ME
�
/
h
/
J
a�
_.
I '-if g
7
'Z09t
Z m�
p�5
U
N O
Z
O y�
_N
= O
�8�6s \9r
\ U�
\
Bp \ M
\Q3 boyy a vi 160 °
o < ` N b •' g r J / \ �S o) \
CC
C) vi
sm
CL
\ \/\ \
- 1
r
w
PC
o,
CL=
o
�I Z
�o
ae
go 1
1
m
\ j
8
1
�
_.
I '-if g
7
'Z09t
Z m�
p�5
U
N O
Z
O y�
_N
= O
�8�6s \9r
\ U�
\
Bp \ M
\Q3 boyy a vi 160 °
o < ` N b •' g r J / \ �S o) \
CC
C) vi
sm
CL
\ \/\ \
- 1

c! �amaVo 23LII� (INNS aNV va
Adg32IOd (Mod Ada LS
°° • s�� s� . Ae asp xe meva3xa
,.e 30
u;�3>� `r D'i.�r'?�,f `" �si:_ w�•n AIOI.LVAIIBN[00 - S ails
:� ` xyva ava av�
:r': s•.. a• s 'ma- sse�sxnevasao\�ueo!�sumw��,
1:)81'Oild
.LNRLA1T)NVHN3 a3HSN37.VM
8 pay¢ aid meld ,'.,„P `lQ aros oe eor Z T
%,•,�n��•••• °S6 0 s3niVn MGM SRdL1ItlR )INVd HLROS SWD y3aHs
�iF 3:2- K4 INA
KW OWI
VoN y¢
Ft
<BO
DO
gg
6F-g:w r Z <S <S ridge -�0a win�
T
5.09<a
669 % ACA, IC1 s =g . o
! i m W W < J a y, <
11 ZW
li - -- 1� ^h h / �/�—UE / / T \`� �< Zp� v,1
<� UN`S~ N� C99W ox
/
m 1 f / ►� ''�' / r
gg
awl g� I
11,3 A �r Yom/
1 Z t-
gg
Z
� m
FS
ro
o
W F=1 9 gig N/ G )/ /
Lo
9 V9 z-
za
Mali
/
�gg
�i i " � j •� '�xs. ,� r ,-�4
_ 88 w
�-`�—f // ..�! /, \\ �Z
\0
® \ J
VXcJ '<o • •/ V "8 f
I I JL33HS 33S - 3N1'IHa,LVW
M r= r M= M M M M M M i M M M M M M

.,o, -a o+...a. +we,n
!1% ,.a„M�rrryrq,•
�n�dj ;;�...�....� >••
U y'• }�Z:
zFz'.
%dp'• S
56 OV
Uva
11 IC F
All a3AOVWV _.
wo --
NOUN1ai "oia
01 ajus
LS
30
A 1a37 7
xrn
.a�Y d3ad
iva
HLYd 3113 OYJ
oY7sHrbios \suYdk630\lxeol\sW3oaa\n
LmawaJlNVHN3Q3HS2I3,LVM
St1aWY� }I2IVd HLf10S-SLN�
Si
ta3Hs
.L
Imm,
a
n
® 8=
® co
P o�N 8
r= ��F W 9
J 5N (y/< 01mq � F�3 W4q �mj ~ 7-2
O
F ~mW ~
Way
b W N
x41
Vl �F ;�0 7 F <F<J OF�W� mV mH F
p5 O J N
�bgfli -off
l-i F~
06 S N Vg' he �<
of 8 ZtW F
21 F� �yp e0. OOOVN i�A�O €9 i"?z xa
gHIr: ,Q yaw ggga'r� << =F �s
U Z�Hsj 0 W <Z <K < 6¢ f onU
<�,7�5 fTcO -j{1� !ay�W <H t'�WFN�IrInY a4] W�y� RNJ
>8 jWj��? O6zzpS F- rifVi �...
ri9� r vi ASR ,e� 25F ri,zi 03 8 '<11 a.
9Z +Zt 'V1S % 133HS 3NnH0ivm
r � i I .3. n1 � � � m S '••. .�.:
6 1 7 I lr
T
���
m "}m chi A.
1s Gaa -`?`� CI.,
Ei W `� f
0 Z09
Sap Wf,
r
Zr to Z 12 8I b 1 s
i m ,d N rY 3 ^ f I
CY
>>
4L 7
fX i "Y
SBE
iDi
lilt
pM 1
11� 01 s my�
-��q T
- �/,/
Q
'j
„P�\x
I� _d
rTtJ
FE
/
�`II \�s
/j s��2�Y s
7�
'°4•
\ y
0
a ` Illy
i
/ A i
y / /
ylY /
y4y 1
1 I
1 �
0
�I
z
N
FF--
V)
Li
W
ji
W
Z
J
U
r
Q

Yx.e..t w.aro nm.ewu
�":�, � �
N,w.�ew+nvr
:Agpaa^ a ai
�% `�pmanrnq
S^ � � .._...,'�si,�.�
r D 7 J S 2 i
zjO
mid S1
3LY13
AH OaAOUddv
AlOI.LAI�.L ■�2I0Ifi
,�
OT .1 us
LS
jn
xe as�osro
NNO
xe asavaaaa
Wd
"Yd MU 0%0
? YOSM/ L�l {S!\SNVId \NJ630\19[e91�5W3'OW \1
133f DiId
.LNaw3jXvHN3 Q3H ailvM
saawva }Blvd HJU10 'SN.3
91
133HS
S3bVA
-ON gw
9.,0,
F�-
� r
of • r
IT
e aa&�Q ~Q�jx i 3
Z /
1
WW�
N
J
a
e0
�r
UW
2V
<y
/ a
� / N �i �� Srin�S�'�) ♦ soh � /g. � w� - � o
r.
- - 10
4AA _� v
J -'4
i , ..;�•. s erg.
�s, xi
I
Q� ��♦ ��� of �' ,
1 4
i
.I
a � �
Lj
I
I i
I
W s Z
E $ g = e
w _
\ \ anp N no
O
\ L ♦ �ap
x
r7 A
l Q
U)
Ld
2 C,4
^ /
N N_
zQ
/X
bt%.
1>01% IhRg
5)

rmrv'w.u.a, rw,i na
to �]rr'w a
�l ,,,,�epTrppr ,
f_
J' F\' •, `nom
3.LV0
-- -fiT.0
Aa G3AOaday
—_. "I -
dmod IVA
Sj '.�.]<.rs
.i0
AS 43MJ3NJ
AS MVd31M
....
,...s•�woasr
• V•.. M,✓'sy:
uru
wa
w.vd311jm3
ZDaPOiId
a ao ��S�
..
� • d xcb\sM.w asaa\ra eor\uo� oaa
ZNawaamdHma a 3HSmmLvAA
61
g paw a
.....r,,. .. %S6
sndWvJ �vd HZnos -SW:)
L33N5
S
,e Ie r
' e
I n1Ai.�J�l'1�1 _'1r•
A
�, a •r a •,
fl
z Te> Z
Z
w p Kr � ttyy,,11��
F"1 j Li J
g � 9- boo =� $m ma
vie
" "
$ y
z mm�� ��rc vi
U 3pS8y�
-( p<10 i S�_
H 8G W;;Oz N Z
`= W
9 V
a K 4V-
NJ
� �z o rc��w�r ♦r Lni� u� $ �k' � Q33 adR a1' FF°
� - a 851%5 66 680
N
r
.0
L, }' N ` \`.�� � •yyyyyy���111•jj,�r' '�� b. \�'�. �� -_V.>_ � _ ff \.\\ � �'�` ��- -"���� \\ \ �''° ~VNl - --�\ ` �
�V '
GD
R
LL C>3 \ `•° . \. P`P i t �b \\ \ \ xp a h' el _ `'F 8
\ \ 3 11.E N � \ \\ `F �\ 'r. ' -^ I �'�•
F s✓ , ;5 \ il•}I 1 yy 1 \ \\� \
CN
I I,' O
Id j
G GI %'/ I I I \
C3 dWWl
{N << /'/ , /./ Ir I i I' ! 1 I \ \ \� /' \ \ \ \ \,,
�����•. A �)A�AI
� �.'• �� fi�� � / Ip '� �: i , I : � /� / ; / ..1 ill; \'�, -..� I "^ y
. ' C0 Q I•' r / ✓,; - �M'•, ir, "� / /�f 11 ,1
y// \ ' tsr / ♦/ / 1 a� / l Irpll t �d tm 16j
i �w` I: / /yr /• i
� Z � F � W Vi n" /rr,, / i' li �. �G,i / • / / / , 1 \ �( \= I I � 1 1 r �
� _�'�_�� �' �.� � '� /,, / /�, i9 �s-�"• /.� r\ � _�x / .� / /�rQ� -<.. 1 It\ � \ \ \, \, I\ 1,I II I� % i �'O / 1 I
(n � n I ( i1i�, .°"i;ri� / / / /� /r. � /i�'✓ r /'� /l / il' �"/ `3F 11 I\ \ \r`�'.� i \1 \ I /// I
U Q
-
� " I � I � '\..% // ;� , � / � /
O -
X / I
J O , F/(`/ �� ' o.'' Vc�° / // yid. /�
`' �•�j r / / �tJ�l
U)
jr
$ in a r,' r . � ,x r 1/ oro ♦ / / / I I % � � / \ �'� \ \ �I / � � ~ ( "
40 1
/ /��'' / / /i /�,: / J \♦ `�� —� _� / ! _ - ��— rte+°. S/� � � �i iJl '/ � �. r 4� � I - y�. -' I' I
�•�/ �i ',° � I v/ � / p`sgW3� �a�� ,� , \� �r / /d /4 ����� — �r N�n�� /(
1 , �' ♦ / \ \�..
g $ ,f•%'E 'n 15 / ��ia?�� %'��"ny \ 114 : �_ i I

KOIy'M+nb?1 WNmN'J NUgropy
awe • �_
Pais sus
p0 p
�O \ \ \ \\ \I\nu,""I
..;� -,
s ki5-
roil, III
,y \ 3
�
,''••••mIU\• °• oS6 �%
aM
s o
AS O3AOSddY
NNE
axod.LdM
i IS
S d,L
LS
do
ASO3N33FU
Nro
A (3MVd3Ld
tltl
ILLYd 3•IIA GY3
'' JMO' SNY' N- YS6 \SNf'd�W530�19L801 \Sl]TO`Jd\�l
LWOW
.LNdW3JNVHNd QdHSIId,LVM
SRdWVJXHVdHIMS-SWJ
oz
Lasxs
I
of = � -.T, n
� ��
/ / m
i
iIo /
383 I f m �L/ Q o
zzz�j__
` I �
I Ioo/A
N
\`F m
75 .x Wtl \\l-
N
E a 2 , o o
aI
4-- °' g I 18
L
Q Cygi
r p�
o b '616 — —
Q \ I
a
Q v
I
V/
t
1
6L
1
11
r
.N
/
p0 p
0
m
N
m N
p
8
m
pq
n Y
i
I
O
m m m
O
pp
f
m
0
m
N
m N
p
8
m
pq
n Y
i
I
O
1p� pY
m O
�
10
10
8
10
q
N
pm
1A
Yf
b
�II
i
'wo ,
-1no
k r�
AMD
9 -M
NI 1S
'LL9
it
U9 caus
iocmDN
NOLLO
4nP d
Mid L
+LL t
LS
I�
�
O
m�
r
/
�
1
m
�
to
m
IL
;
L
33S
Z
't0
1141,
-n
1
,BL
909
I .9l
,osr
-
doi
d
9z +tL
YiS
,Ll•t0
-AM
0138
1
03
9'Zd
Zz +l
Y1S
S1
*69-1
NI
am
la
93c
9f 0
+tl vLs
0169-Al
1
a
oKm
1"
030
o 99
l Vl
a
A9
-AI
11
al
ON3
IOA
030
OB
L Y
a
ES
8
,f9'
9-A
I
I
p
o
ON
N34 1
930
99
L
lIY
0
00'
-
no Ail
N�
,0701
-A
W
8no
NwO
9
9L Y1
,96'
09 -AO
Al
F_
Qr+
OL Y
09
nvnb
kMV
NO3
�
N
o
N
�IE
_SSm
NN
F
V
3
v
3
Q O
v .-
z
U ,n
N
a � o
u
a
K
a
a
0
=a
0
Ln
0
LO
LLJ
_J
LL.
0
w
CL
8
O
1p� pY
m O
�
10
10
8
10
q
N
pm
1A
Yf
Q O
v .-
z
U ,n
N
a � o
u
a
K
a
a
0
=a
0
Ln
0
LO
LLJ
_J
LL.
0
w
CL

N/Iy WIIMAI wpeWOlFWWVa
• =
�N.9w.- Irelua- -w..a. . -, � N ...rWa .
• H
N N O Y O O N
b m b m
O \ \, \1I/1I1111 /III I��
US \ .
� A sYa� o "�•.•,, I��II,zs � z .� :
,
,o• , i,I
31va
_TTc7c,
19 a3A09ddv
N Q
3'IVMS QNV w3m as WHOLS
Si aLIS
L S
JO
A9(M03HO
A9a39vdaw
0vdsdv3
Ioa1Oid
LNl3W33NVHNHG3HSHalVM
SndWVD)MVJ HIflOS -Sw�
CZ
m 0 w S
•. 1NOSNVId- 1{C6 \SNVId�Ip530\19G801 \5,�3bb \�l
,0 -,l:A
retsol
II
I
3
w
S
z
Q
J
a
O
LL.
F_
Ld
W
2
V)
L
H
w
w
V)
11I^^
Y/
z
`O
r
U
W
U)
Z °a
v! 0,
4H 9L
FO
<U
Map
s <9 S � §K 8XI Opt
;3
�8 rs -% gK <WW O CLL <f� < lQ (J Ip G117Y
\ 'I
,�I F
1\ I
I ; �
1 -i
ull
4 II
1 ;
a ;
I
0
d -
�'�
r �-
R /i
�m
:+ t \ a
,I• I' ' II ,Iii � ♦ �g s � x//
i
1 q g
N
O'000� 1
181 -N ' -
I
I ; C
i I /
I �; fi5F
' I I
\I�
< \ 1 AI
N N O Y O O N
b m b m
m o aND O iD ID
41
e m
m 0 w S
o
17' m
b m
II
I
N
°n
o
I-T
n
N
pg�{1
a
o
�
�•9Z9
1f10
A N
- .__.
--
.......
m
-
N
'
YNf �
I �
I
f
♦ Nf M -
I I I
N
I
N
I
I
O. N
I I
3
w
S
z
Q
J
a
O
LL.
F_
Ld
W
2
V)
L
H
w
w
V)
11I^^
Y/
z
`O
r
U
W
U)
Z °a
v! 0,
4H 9L
FO
<U
Map
s <9 S � §K 8XI Opt
;3
�8 rs -% gK <WW O CLL <f� < lQ (J Ip G117Y
\ 'I
,�I F
1\ I
I ; �
1 -i
ull
4 II
1 ;
a ;
I
0
d -
�'�
r �-
R /i
�m
:+ t \ a
,I• I' ' II ,Iii � ♦ �g s � x//
i
1 q g
N
O'000� 1
181 -N ' -
I
I ; C
i I /
I �; fi5F
' I I
\I�
< \ 1 AI
N N O Y O O N
b m b m
m o aND O iD ID
41
d L-4
� e�
Si �f' tl
II
I
N
N
pg�{1
�•9Z9
1f10
A N
- .__.
--
.......
-
N
'
{t
Y15
I
o�+
arc
COY
t OL
1000
.
Z9=
f10 AIII
.1
A313
N1 A
ON
I
LC
It-Yl
+
chi
a
$
N
K
a
I
O
+
OLS
O(1JN
,9£'f
9- 1
0 AN
f9
Z9-
NIAM
� L {
9 -9-
� l
OMB
\
cl
OO IfObKL
N3d0
doad
Ld
59+0
-v1S
O
LO
Ld
r
1
� J
I
�
�
O
I
�
a.
1
,f
'Bl9
1610
NI
19,1z 'l-
NI
NI
:1
-
10'*Z'
-
-A31
1Y0
NL
Ol
N
Iy
,111
d
IT
+ri
g
—
1
1
-a)
\
•{
-
AM
w
Li +6
Y1S
I
r
jl
Y.K
�
't
I%
II
,
I
I I
I
I 1 I
I I l
3
w
S
z
Q
J
a
O
LL.
F_
Ld
W
2
V)
L
H
w
w
V)
11I^^
Y/
z
`O
r
U
W
U)
Z °a
v! 0,
4H 9L
FO
<U
Map
s <9 S � §K 8XI Opt
;3
�8 rs -% gK <WW O CLL <f� < lQ (J Ip G117Y
\ 'I
,�I F
1\ I
I ; �
1 -i
ull
4 II
1 ;
a ;
I
0
d -
�'�
r �-
R /i
�m
:+ t \ a
,I• I' ' II ,Iii � ♦ �g s � x//
i
1 q g
N
O'000� 1
181 -N ' -
I
I ; C
i I /
I �; fi5F
' I I
\I�
< \ 1 AI
Cc
x�`�{ C
�/'✓
- \
i = ! i = = m = = ! m = m = m m = = i
41
d L-4
� e�
Si �f' tl
II
Cc
x�`�{ C
�/'✓
- \
i = ! i = = m = = ! m = m = m m = = i

1
1
11
' 0 Site Photographs
F1
1
1
1
u
1

�1
he
IM
View of non - jurisdictional drainage feature NJD2 near
its origin.
Taken by: DDH SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
CMS South Park Campus
Checked by: JoL *S& Watershed Enhancement Project
Date Taken: 12.1.2011 ME Charlotte, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357 -11 -032 Photo Page 1 of 3

11 View of typical upland conditions (playing fields)
within Work Site 15.
8 View of non - jurisdictional drainage feature NJD4.
10 View at upland data point DP2.
Taken by: DDH
Checked by: JoL ME
Date Taken: 12.1.2011
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
CMS South Park Campus
Watershed Enhancement Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357 -11 -032 Photo Page 2 of 3

)e
15 View of north bank of S1 at the proposed siphon line
crossing within Work Site 25. Riprap placement
17 View of south bank of S1 where riprap placement
associated with a BMP outfall is proposed within
Work Site 15.
Taken by: DDH
Checked by:JoL
v mm N to M E
Date Taken: 12.1.2011
proposed within Work Site 10.
ith a
View of looking downstream (west) at proposed siphon
line crossing of stream S1.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
CMS South Park Campus
Watershed Enhancement Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357 -11 -032 Photo Page 3 of 3

t
1 • Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
1
e
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
,7
1
1
1
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER ASHEVILLE FIELD REGULATORY OFFICE
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION CMS SOUTHGATE CAMPUS
State NORTH CAROLINA County /pansh/borough MECKLENBURG City CHARLOTTE
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 1692 N Long 80 8361 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody BRIAR CREEK
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) LOWER CATAWBA (HUC 03050103)
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
❑ Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are waters of the U S within Clean Water Act (CWA) Junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of US in review area (check all that apply) '
❑ TNWs including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters S1 2 850 LF S2 85 LF S3 177 LF linear feet S1 20 S2 2 S3 6 width (ft) and/or acres
Wetlands 0 01 acres
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain FOUR EPHEMERAL STORM DRAINAGE CHANNELS WERE DETERMINED BY THE NORTH
CAROLINA METHODOLOGY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS TO
BE LACKING FEATURES INDICATIVE OF RELATIVELY PERMANENT FLOW AND THUS ARE NOT
CONSIDERED JURISDICTIONAL (STREAM SCORES NJDI 5 5 NJD2 16 5 NJD3 13 NJD4 16 5)
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
Z For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

1
1
SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections 111 A 1 and 2
and Section 111 D I otherwise see Section III B below
I 1 TNW
Identify TNW
1
1
1
1
1
1
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody° is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW if the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 20 acres
Drainage area Pick List
Average annual rainfall 43 inches
Average annual snowfall 6 inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 12 river miles from TNW
' Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are I (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
IIdentify flow route to TNW5 S2 > SI > BRIAR CREEK > LITTLE SUGAR CREEK (TNW)
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW
1

' Tributary stream order if known FIRST
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
' Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
® Manipulated (man altered) Explain CHANNEL ORIGIN iS DETERMINED BY
STORMWATER OUTFALL
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
rl
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 2 feet
Average depth 5 feet
Average side slopes 2 1
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
® Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type // cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain SOMEWHAT ERRODING DUE TO
STORM FLOWS
Presence of run/nffle /pool complexes Explain LIMITED RIFFLE / POOL COMPLEXES
Tributary geometry Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) 3 /
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime LIKELY FLOWS FOLLOWING RAIN EVENTS WITH PERSISTENT POOLS PRESENT
DURING THE WET SEASON
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Discrete and confined Characteristics
Subsurface flow Unknown Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑
® changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /charactenstics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(m) Chemical Characteristics
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum
❑ physical markings
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
' the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
Ibid

' Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
Explain STORMWATER FROM UPSLOPE PARKING LOTS POTENTIALLY INTRODUCES POLLUTANTS
ITNERMITTENTLY
' Identify specific pollutants if known POTENTIALLY MOTOR OIL / ANTIFREEZE
1
1
F
1
17
1
1
1 7 1
1
1
1

1
i
!I
1
1
1
(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings SOME POTENTIAL HABITAT FOR AQUATIC SPECIES ADAPTED
TO INTERMITTENT FLOW CONDITIONS IS PRESENT
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 0 01 acres
Wetland type Explain NON VEGETATED FLOODPLAIN DEPRESSION
Wetland quality Explain MODERATE QUALITY
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Ephemeral flow Explain
Surface flow is Overland sheetflow
Characteristics LIKELY RECIEVES FLOOD FLOWS DURING HIGH WATER EVENTS
Subsurface flow Yes Explain findings WETLAND DEPRESSION ELEVATION IS BELOW THE WATER TABLE
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
® Separated by berm/bamer Explain A NARROW BERM SEPERATES WA FROM S1 THIS IS LIKELY
OVER TOPPED DURING HIGH FLOW EVENTS
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1 2 river miles from TNW
Protect waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from Wetland to navigable waters
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 2 year or less floodplam
(u) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc) Explain OXIDATION DEPOSITS ON THE SUFRACE SULFIDIC ODOR
Identify specific pollutants if known NONE
(iii) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width) WETLAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE EXTENSIVE
RIPARIAN BUFFER OF STREAM S 1
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis 1
Approximately ( 0 01 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

�7
1
1
II
l
1
1
1
1
1
For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres)
WA (N) 001
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed WA PROVIDES FOR STORAGE OF
EXCESS WATER DURING PERIODS OF HIGH FLOW IN SOUTH FORK FISHING CREEK WHICH IS IMPORTANT FOR
STABILIZING RIVER HYDROLOGY
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and hfecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D A SIGNIFICANT NEXUS WAS FOUND FOR WA AS A TYPICAL ADJACENT FLOODPLAIN WETLAND
IT PROVIDES STORAGE OF EXCESS WATER DURING PERIODS OF HIGH FLOW IN S1 AND POLLUTANT
FILTRATION OF OVERLAND FLOW FROM UPLAND AREAS INTO THE CREEK SINCE THIS WETLAND PLAYS A
SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF SI AND HAVE A CLEAR HYDOLOGICAL CONECTION
TO S1 (A SIZEABLE TRIBUTARY TO BRIAR CREEK AND ULITMATELY TO LITTLE SUGAR CREEK) IT WOULD BE
CONSIDERED TO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NEXUS TO LITTLE SUGAR CREEK A TNW
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
I TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑ TNWs lmear feet width (fl) Or acres
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs

1
' ® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial S1 IS A LARGE ( -20 FOOT WIDE) TRIBUTARY TO BRIAR CREEK WHICH APPEARS AS
PERENIAL ON USGS MAPPING FISH WERE OBSERVED IN THIS CHANNEL INDICATING ITS PERENNIAL
1 (YEAR YOUND) FLOW STATUS S3 SCORED 32 5 ON THE NCDWQ STREAM DETERMINATION FORM
INDICATING PERENNIAL (YEAR ROUND) FLOW
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally S2 SCORED 20 5 ON THE NCDWQ STREAM FORM INDICATING INTERMITTENT (SEASONAL) FLOW
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters Sl 2 850 LF S2 85 LF S3 177 LF linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
' ❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tnbutanes typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area 0 01 acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
1
1
1
1
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a junsdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from `waters of the U S or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
See Footnote k 3
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section iIi D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook

1
1
1
1
E ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for Junsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for Junsdiction Explain
® Other (explain if not covered above) FOUR EPHEMERAL STORM DRAINAGE CHANNELS WERE DETERMINED BY
THE NORTH CAROLINA METHODOLOGY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS TO
BE LACKING FEATURES INDICATIVE OF RELATIVELY PERMANENT FLOW ( STREAM SCORES NJD1 5 5 NJD2 16 5
NJD3 13 NJD4 16 5)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for Junsdiction (check all that apply)
® Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) —75 linear feet 3 width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
' ❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
' SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant S &ME INC
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1988 CHARLOTTE EAST [NC] 1 24 000 QUAD SHEET (FIGURE 2)
' Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Distr cts w 11 elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

1
1
1
1
1
1
®
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATASET
FOR MECKLENBURG COUNTY SEE FIGURE 3
❑
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑
State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑
FEMA/FIRM maps
❑
100 year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®
Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date) 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (SEE FIGURE 4)
or ® Other (Name & Date) SITE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN 12 1 2011
'
❑
Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑
Applicable /supporting case law
❑
Applicable /supporting scientific literature
❑
Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
APPENDIX V
o N C Division of Water Quality ( DWQ Stream Identification
)
Forms
USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Wetland and
1 Upland Determination Forms
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 11
Date 12/1/2011
Project CMS South Park Campus BMPs
Latitude 35 16754 N
Evaluator S &ME (D David Homans)
Site /Stream ID NJD1
Longitude 80 8352 W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
if 19 or perennial if a 30
Stream Determination
Ephemeral
County
Mecklenburg
Other e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 4 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
No = 0
C Biology (Subtotal 0 )
18 Fibrous roots in channel
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
19 Rooted plants in channel
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
0
20 Macrobenthos
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
21 Aquatic mollusks
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
22 Fish
8 Head cuts
0
23 Crayfish
9 Grade control
05
24 Amphibians
10 Natural valley
05
25 Algae
11 Second or greater order channel
No= 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions In manual
B Hvdroloav (Subtotal= 1 5 1
12 Presence of baseflow
0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14 Leaf litter
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
16 Organic debris lines or piles
05
boil based evidence ot high water table?
No = 0
C Biology (Subtotal 0 )
18 Fibrous roots in channel
0
19 Rooted plants in channel
0
20 Macrobenthos
0
21 Aquatic mollusks
0
22 Fish
0
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
perennial scream smay also oe maetrtiea using otner metnoas bee p 35 of manual
Notes
Down slope of 18 RCP outfall
Sketch

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 11
Date 12/1/2011
Project CIVIS South Park Campus BMPs
Latitude 35 16634 N
Evaluator S &ME (D David Homans)
Site /Stream ID NJD2
Longitude 80 83533 W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 165
dz 19 or perennial if2 30
if
Stream Determination
Ephemeral
County
Other e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= 13
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
No = 0
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
6 Depositional bars or benches
None /Other = 0
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
1
8 Head cuts
1
9 Grade control
05
10 Natural valley
05
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 2 5
12 Presence of baseflow
1
0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
14 Leaf litter
0
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
boil based evidence o Ig wa er a e
No = 0
C Bioloav (Subtotal 1 )
18 Fibrous roots in channel
0
19 Rooted plants in channel
1
20 Macrobenthos
0
21 Aquatic mollusks
0
22 Fish
0
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
perennial stream smay also De Inoetlnea using otner metnoos See p 35 of manual
Notes
Down slope of two 30 RCP outfalls Channel becomes more diffuse the farther you ao downsloge
Sketch

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 11
Date 12/1/2011
Project CMS South Park Campus BMPs
Latitude 35 16944 N
Evaluator S &ME (D David Homans)
Site /Stream ID NJD3
Longitude 80 83577 W
Total Points
Stream is at least intemattent 13
ifZ 19 or perennial d Z 30
Stream Determination
Ephemeral
County
Mecklenburg
Other e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= 9 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step -pool
ripple pool sequence
= 0
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
6 Depositional bars or benches
None /Other = 0
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
1
8 Head cuts
0
9 Grade control
05
10 Natural valley
0
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
R Hvrirolnav lSuhtntai = i 5 1
12 Presence of baseflow
1
0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14 Leaf litter
0
05
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
boil based evidence of high water tallo
= 0
C Bioloav (Subtotal 1 )
18 Fibrous roots in channel
0
19 Rooted plants in channel
20 Macrobenthos
0
21 Aquatic mollusks
0
22 Fish
0
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
0
26 Wetland plants In streambed
None /Other = 0
perennrar stream smay arso oe maetmea using omer memoas bee p so or manual
Notes
Downslope of large riprap check structure
Sketch

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 11
Date 12/1/2011
Project CMS South Park Campus BMPs
Latitude 35 16771 N
Evaluator S &ME (D David Homans)
Site /Stream ID NJD4
Longitude 80 83189 W
Total Points
Stmam is at least intermittent 165
if z 19 or perennial if a 30
Stream Determination
Ephemeral
County
Mecklenburg
Other e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= 7 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
05
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
I
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
0
Yes = 3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
6 Depositional bars or benches
None /Other = 0
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
I
8 Head cuts
0
9 Grade control
0
10 Natural valley
05
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
R Hvdmloav (Suhtntal = 7
12 Presence of baseflow
2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14 Leaf litter
0
05
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
I
boil based evidence ot high water ta a
0
Yes = 3
C Bloloav (Subtotal 2 1
18 Fibrous roots In channel
19 Rooted plants in channel
20 Macrobenthos
0
21 Aquatic mollusks
0
22 Fish
0
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
paianrnai aueam snay aisu ue mueunea using Omer memous Jee p so or manual
Notes
Downslo a of small headwall with 20 RCP Channel disappears Into a leaf pile no clear channel exists
downslope on other side of the road
Sketch

1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 11
Date 12/1/2011
Project CMS South Park Campus BMPs
Latitude 35 16937 N
Evaluator S &ME (D David Homans)
Site /Stream ID S2
Longitude 80 83377 W
Total Points 20 5
Stream is at least mterm�ttent
d t 19 or perennial if z 30
Stream Determination
Intermittent
County
Mecklenburg
9
Other e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal= 11 5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
05
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalwe
0
05
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
0
yes = 3
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
6 Depositional bars or benches
None /Other = 0
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
8 Head cuts
0
9 Grade control
05
10 Natural valley
0
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdroloav, (Subtotal = 7 1
12 Presence of baseflow
2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
i
14 Leaf litter
0
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
boil based evidence of high water ta a
0
yes = 3
C Bloloav (Subtotal 2 )
18 Fibrous roots in channel
19 Rooted plants in channel
i
20 Macrobenthos
0
21 Aquatic mollusks
0
22 Fish
0
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
yciaiuuai soeam smay also oe mueunea using diner memoos see p so or manual
Notes
Originates at a nprap and geotextile lined plunge pool at the outfall of a 24 RCP
Sketch

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification or Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v 4 11
Date 12/1/2011
Project CMS South Park Campus BMPs
Latitude 35 16671 N
Evaluator S &ME (D David Homans)
Site /Stream ID S3
Longitude 80 83022 W
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
ifZ19or perennial dz30 5
Stream Determination
Perennial
County
Mecklenbur 9
Other e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
'=
1 5
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool
ripple ool sequence
0
Yes 3
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
5 Active /relic flood lain
0
1
6 Depositional bars or benches
None /Other = 0
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
2
8 Head cuts
0
9 Grade control
05
10 Natural valley
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No= 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions In manual
R Hvcirnlnnv (Subtotal = 1f)
12 Presence of baseflow
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
14 Leaf litter
1 5
2
15 Sediment on plants or debris
1
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
'=
1 5
boll based evidence of high water table-.,
0
Yes 3
C Bloloav (Subtotal 9 )
18 Fibrous roots in channel
2
19 Rooted plants in channel
2
20 Macrobenthos
2
21 Aquatic mollusks
2
22 Fish
0
23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
1
26 Wetland plants in streambed
None /Other = 0
perenrnai scream smay also oe lnaeuriea using omer memoas gee p 35 of manual
Notes
Directly adjacent to Colony Rd
Sketch

1
1
1
t
1
I
1
t
1
1
F1
�I
[-I
1
1
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProlecttSite CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect City /County Charlotte / Mecklenburg Sampling Date 12/1/2011
Applicant/Owner Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services State NC Sampling Point WA
Investigator(s) D David Homans Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc ) floodplam Local relief (concave convex none) concave Slope (/) 5/
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 S Piedmont Lat 35 169143 Long 80 836429 Datum NAD83
Sod Map Unit Name Wilkes Loam 15 25 / Slopes NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation X Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Wetland lacked vegetation altogether due to full canopy small size and lack of visible herbaceous growth due to the wintertime observation Sparse
hydrophytic vegetation is likely present during the growing season
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) Surface
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary tinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
IUS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

Fi
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point WA
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Wetland lacked vegetation altogether due to full canopy small size and lack of visible herbaceous growth due to the wintertime
observation Sparse hydrophytic vegetation is likely present dunng the growing season
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
A Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species x2=
1
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x4=
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals (A) (B)
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
8
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9
— 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
10
— 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0
4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
—
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
2
3
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree — Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
7
height
8
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants excluding vines less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 it (1 m) tall
10
11
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
= Total Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
height
1
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Wetland lacked vegetation altogether due to full canopy small size and lack of visible herbaceous growth due to the wintertime
observation Sparse hydrophytic vegetation is likely present dunng the growing season
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

1
1
1
Ll
1
t
1
1
I I
1
t
SOIL Sampling Point WA
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) h Color (moist) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 16+ 10YR 4/2 100 clay loam Hydrogen sulfide odor
Type C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lmina M =Matrx
Hydnc Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydrrc Soils'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (1`2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (1`6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (1`8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydnc
Sod Present? Yes No X
Remarks
F3 indicator would have likely been present if sod was allowed to dry with no pores due to the absence of root channels complete saturation
prevented redox features were not observed
IUS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

t
1
t
l
1
1
t
t
1
1
fJ
1
1
1
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect City /County Charlotte / Mecklenburg Sampling Date 12/1/2011
Applicant/Owner Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services State NC Sampling Point UP A
Investigator(s) D David Homans Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) floodolam Local relief (concave convex none) concave Slope (/) 5/
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 S Piedmont Lat 35 1692716 Long 80 836147 Datum NAD83
Sod Map Unit Name Wilkes Loam 15 25 / Slopes NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

t
t
I
t
t
1
1
t
I
I
t
�i
r
1
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point UP A
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover Speaes7 Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Faqus grandifolia
40 X FACU
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 0 (A)
2 Quercus rubra
30 X FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Oxydendrum arboretum
10 NI
Species Across All Strata 4 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 0/ (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
80 = Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species 0 x2=
1 Lonicera maacku
25 X UPL
FAC species 0 x 3 =
2
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
3
UPL species 65 x 5 = 325
4
Column Totals 140 (A) 605 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 432
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
9
2 Dominance Test is >50 /
10
3 Prevalence Index is 53 0
4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
25 = Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 Hedera helix
40 X UPL
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
2 Viola sp
10
3
Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree — Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
7
height
IS
g
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
11
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
50 = Total Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
height
1
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes No X
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

1
1
[i
1
I
1
1
1
SOIL Sampling Point UP A
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) A Type Loc Texture Remarks
02 10YR 3/3 100 fine s loam
2 16+ 10YR 5/4 100 Gravelly clay
Type C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains `Location PL =Pore Linina M =Matrix
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc So1Is3
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydnc
Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
IUS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

[7
1
1
1
r
it
r
1
1
r
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect City /County Charlotte / Mecklenburg Sampling Date 12/1/2011
ApplicanUOwner Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services State NC Sampling Point DPI
Investigator(s) D David Homans Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc ) Hdlslope Local relief (concave convex none) concave Slope(/) 5/
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 S Piedmont Lat 35 16914381 Long 80 8364292 Datum NAD83
Sod Map Unit Name Wilkes Loam 15 25 / slopes NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primate Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
IUS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

1
t
1
r�
1
1
I
1
1
t
1
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point DPI
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover
Species) Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Quercus rurba
30
X FACU
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 4 (A)
2 Caroinus carohruana
20
X FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Liourdambar strvaciflua
20
X FAC
Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 66/ (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species x 2 =
1 Lonicera maackn
40
X UPL
FAC species x 3 =
2 Lioustrum sinense
20
X FAC
FACU species x4=
3
UPL species x 5 -
4
Column Totals (A) (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
X 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
X 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
9
10
_ 3 Prevalence Index is < -3 0
4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1 Arundinana aiaantea
25
X FACW
2
3
Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
7
height
8
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
11
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
height
1
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes X No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

1
1
t
1
1
1
1
I j
t
1
SOIL Sampling Point DPI
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
/
Color (moist) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
05
10YR 3/4
100
Clay Loam
5 12
5YR 4/6
100
Clay
12 18+
10YR 4/3
100
Clay
Type C= Concentration D= Depletion I
Hydnc Soil Indicators
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (1`19) (MLRA 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

1
!J
C
1
f
1
a
1
r
1
1
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site CMS South Park Campus Watershed Enhancement Proiect City /County Charlotte / Mecklenburg Sampling Date 12/1/2011
Applicant/Owner Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services State NC Sampling Point DP2
Investigator(s) D David Homans Section Township Range
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc) floodplam Local relief (concave convex none) concave Slope(/) 5/
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 S Piedmont Lat 35 1679909 Long 80 8321763 Datum NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name Monocan and Arents Soils NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Presents Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that aoaly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
IUS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

1
1
1
0
t
1
L�
1
1
1
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point DP2
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rurbum
40 X FAC
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 3 (A)
2 Fraxmus oennsvlvanica
20 X FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3 Liauidambar strvaaflua
10 FAC
Species Across All Strata 4 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 75/ (A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Saolmg /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species x 2 =
1 Lioustrum srnense
50 X FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2 Ilex oAaca
15 FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals (A) (B)
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
8
X 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9
X 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
10
_ 3 Prevalence Index is < -3 0
4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 Hedera helix
45 X UPL
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
2
3
Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
7
height
8
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
11
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
= Total Cover
woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
height
1
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes X No
Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

s
1
J
1
1
1
1
1
IF—I
1
f]
1
SOIL Sampling Point DP2
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) / Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
0 10 10YR 414 100 Clay Loam
11016+ 10YR 5/3 60 2 5Y 4/6 40 RM M Gravelly clay
Type C= Concentration D= Depletion I
Hydric Sod Indicators
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
M
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrx
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version