20201734 Ver 1_Update PJD Request Lane Street Industrial (1-18-21)_20210127

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Lane Street Industrial Development
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Hart & Hickman, PC conducted a preliminary stream and wetland survey on the site and is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination as an initial step to potential permitting activities.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Trammell Crow Company
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
2989 Brantley Road & 5495 Old Salisbury -Concord Road, Kannapolis, NC 28083 (Lat/Long:
35.494405,-80.556247)
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 56336990190000, 56336777140000, 56336772400000,
56335899760000,and 56337862660000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Kannapolis
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Unnamed tributary of Lake Fisher
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 4
Regional General Permit 4
L✓J Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Sent Via Email
September 30, 2020
Revised: January 18, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Attn: Ms. Krysta Stygar
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Re: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
2989 Brantley Road & 5495 Old Salisbury -Concord Road
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
H&H Job No. TCD-001
Dear Krysta:
On behalf of Trammell Crow Company, please rind the enclosed Preliminary Stream and Wetlands
Survey for the above Site in Kannapolis, NC. We are seeking a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination (PJD) for the above -mentioned property. Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) conducted a
preliminary stream and wetland survey on August 24, 2020 through August 26, 2020 and returned to
the Site on October 27, 2020 and December 28, 2020 to complete a delineation on portions of two
additional parcels.
H&H submitted an initial PJD request on September 30, 2020 and conducted Corps Site meetings on
November 5, 2020 and December 28, 2020. Access authorizations signed by representatives of the
property owners are included with this request. An updated Jurisdictional Determination Request form
and associated documents are attached in PDF format. Please contact us if you have any questions or
require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart and Hickman, PC
A0141-jo
Matt Bramblett, PE
Principal
Attachments
Dan McCauley
Asst. Project Environmental Scientist
cc: Mr. Woody Coley, Trammell Crow Company (Via Email)
Mr. Greg Welsh, PE, Oak Engineering (Via Email)
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd , Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847A241 main

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.g my.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProgram/Contact/Coun!yLocator.aWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION 2989 Brantley Road,
Street Address: 5495 and 5615 Old Salisbury -Concord Road
City, State: Kannapolic, NC
County: Cabarrus
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 56336990190000, 56336777140000, 56336772400000,
56335899760000,and 56337862660000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC
Mailing Address: 2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-998-1864
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Timothy & Marie Ramseur
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Sadruddin Roy Fari LLC
5808 Royce Street
Kannapolis, NC
Sadie S. Brantley Trust /
Dwight Richard Locklear
(Trustee)
P.O. Box 56
Kannapolis, NC 28083 Landis, NC 28088
Resurrection Baptist Church
704-938-3202 Timothy Jones
5615 Old Salisbury Concord
Rd Kannapolis, NC 28083
2989 Brantley Road
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION'.4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Resurrection Baptist Church
Print Name
Capacity: 91 Owner MI Authorized Agent'
Timothy B. Jones
Date
�irm'1oNoa��
Timothy B. Jones I 22 020 13 41 EST)
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this �arcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
® I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and.' -'or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my locab-state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version May 2017 Page 3

unsdictional Determination Request
1), PROPE t"TY ACCESS CER TIFIC:A.'TI-(0N.,,4
By signing, below, 1 authorize representatives of the Wflmington District, U.S. Arrny Corps of
i n�ineers Warps) to eater upon the. property herein described. for the, purpose of conducting on-
stte invest'-, lons tt necessary, end issuing, a juri.:�dictioni�l determination pursuant to Sectkot�
404 of the Clean Wafer Ac°t and/car Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized ovvner of record of the property identified herein. or
acting as the; duiy a€rthorized went of the owner ofrecord of the property.
Fari L_LC
Print Name :5 o:�C^e01416C)UA_
Capacity: Z✓ 0vncr ❑Authorized Age;nt5
2_/ Q c,
Elate
Signa.vurc:
E. REASOFORN REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
Q1 intend to construct/develop a project or pe;rforin activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a prQjec:t or perform activities on this parcel which ,N�ould be
desi-ned to avoid ail j urisdictioraal aquatic resources rarrdcr Corps zauthcrrity.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
rey-qui/re(awl-ttoriraYtion fia)om ptYhe Corps, and the
y D would
}b+e step used
to aT[^�ioiid arsci�minimize
impacts to }C1risdictio.na aquatic resources an as an initial. step in L uture pern-litting
process. J
❑ 1 intend to construct/develop az pr(je;ct or pexrform activities on this parcel which May
require authorization frorn the Corps, this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the: JD is to he rased in the perinitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the;
I ".S. which is included can the district Section 10 list and/car is suhject to the ebb and flo-w of
the tide,
HA Corps JIB is required in order obtain m lc�cair�staate autlrcariratiotg.
I intend to contest jurisdic Lion over a particular ayctatic re=scnrrCe :;nd request the Corps
confirm that jtrrisdiction does/doers not exist over the aquatic resource; on the parcel.
I belie-,,c that the site may be comprised entirely- of dry laud.
QOther:
For NCLX)T requests following the current �tiCDO Uti SAC E protaeols, skip to tart E
if there are multiple parcels owned by dif#erent parties, }Tease provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet,
s Must provide agent authori7ation f0rrn/letter Signed by
VerSion: ziav 20t �0 V�,� 10T �t:,

DocuSign Envelope ID: C7474100-15D7-4DEB-9228-4956E455444C
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Timothy & Marie Ramseur
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner [:]Authorized Agents
9/22/2020
Date /--Docuftned by:
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7AF37131 E-FFE4-4E32-ACDD-2F5075B9D8A4
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Sadie S. Brantley Trust / Dwight Richard Locklear (Trustee)
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner [:]Authorized Agents
9/23/2020
Date /-DocuSigned by:
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
ZI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
I I review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area +/- 100 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.494405
Longitude:-80.556247
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatoiy-Permit-
Pro gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
�J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: January 2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Dan McCauley (H&H) 2923 south Tryon street, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, TBD
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cabarrus City: Kannapolis
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.494405 Long.:-80.556247
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed tributary of Lake Fisher
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SCA-Per
35.493194
-80.558726
+/- 754 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCA-Int
35.491849
-80.556022
+/- 966 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCB
35.492373
-80.558361
+/- 111 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCC
35.491552
-80.558318
+/- 541 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCA
35.496374
-80.556237
+/- 1 5940 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCE
35.495658
-80.555421
+/- 450 If
Non -wetland
Section 404

Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of
Geographic
(decimal
(decimal
amount of
aquatic
authority to
degrees)
degrees)
aquatic
resource
which the
resource in
aquatic
review area
resource "may
be" subject
SCF
35.496584
-80.555057
+/- 249 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
WAA
35.491779
-80.556118
+/- 0.021 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAB
35.491966
-80.556663
+/- 0.341 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAE
35.490975
-80.558521
+/- 0.107 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAF
35.492513
-80.558317
+/- 0.481 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAG
35.493788
-80.559787
+/- 0.668 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAI
35.495159
-80.554584
+/- 0.240 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAJ
35.496845
-80.554573
+/- 0.315 ac
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map prepared by H&H dated 12/28/20
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
El
■❑ U.S
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Concord, 2013, 1-24,000
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web soil survey version 3.1, 1/18/21
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS Wetlands, 9/11/2020
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■FEMA/FIRM maps: 3710563300K dated 11/16/18
El
■❑
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, TCD-001, 8/24/2020
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
■❑ Other information (please specify): Hard copy soil survey; Water Supply Watershed map
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Appraisal Card
CABARRUS COUNTY. INC
9/29/2020 11:17:19 AM
BRANTLEY SADIE S TRUST LOCKLEAR RICHARD DWIGHT/TRSTEE Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel: 5633 69 9019 0000
LANE ST NC PLAT: 00000/00000 UNIQ ID 8345
39009 ID NO: 05 001 0082.20 0000
COUNTY TAX (100), MT MITCHELL FIRE TAX (100) CARD NO. 1 of 1
Reval Year: 2020 Tax Year: 2020 TRACT 2 L K BRANTLEY ESTATE 24.0600 AC SRC= Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 06/29/2020 50031 I85 AT LANE STREET TW-05 CI-00 FR-09 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20200629
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
MARKET VALUE
DEPRECIATION
CORRELATION OF VALUE
TOTAL POINT VALUE I
I Eff.
BASE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTSUSEMOD
Area QUAL
RATE
RCNEYB
YB
REDENCETO
OTAL ADJUSTMENT
40 1
00
1 1
1
1
1
1 % GOOD
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD 0
TYPE: INDUSTRIAL
DEPR. OB/XF VALUE - CARD 0
MARKET LAND VALUE - CARD 656,840
FACTOR
OTAL QUALITY INDEX
STYLE:
OTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 656,840
OTAL APPRAISED VALUE - CARD 656,840
OTAL APPRAISED VALUE - PARCEL 656,840
OTAL PRESENT USE VALUE - PARCEL 6,220
OTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 650,620
OTAL TAXABLE VALUE - PARCEL $ 6,220
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE 0
BXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 640,000
PRESENT USE VALUE 5,800
DEFERRED VALUE 634,200
OTAL VALUE 640,000
PERMIT
CODE I DATE NOTE I NUMBER AMOUNT
ROUT: WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD
DATE
DEED
INDICATE SALES
BOOK
PAGE
MOjYR
TYPE
/U
VII
PRICE
05979
0287
5
12005
QC
I A I
V
0
HEATED AREA
NOTES
SUBAREA UNIT ORIG % SIZE ANN DEP % OB/XFDEPR.
GS RPL CODE UALIT DESCRIPTIONCOUNTLTHWTHUNITS PRICE COND BLDG# FACT YBEYB RATE OVRCOND VALUE
I
TYPE AREA % CS TOTALOB/XFVALUE 0
FIREPLACE
SUBAREA
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND
LAND
TOTAL
HIGHEST AND
USE
LOCAL
FRON
DEPTH
LND
COND
NOTES
ROAD
UNIT
LAND
UNT
TOTAL
ADJUSTED
LAND
OVERRIDE
LAND
BEST USE
CODE
ZONING
TAGE
DEPTH
/ SIZE
MOD
FACT
RF AC LC TO OT
TYPE
PRICE
UNITS
TYP
ADJST
UNIT PRICE
VALUE
VALUE
NOTES
INDUSTRIAL
0600
1 LI
516
1 0
1 1.0000
6
0.3900-01-40
+00 -20 +00
RP
1 70,000.00
24.060
AC
0.390
27,300.00
656838
0
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
24.060
656,840
Forestry II
6210
LI
0
0
1 1.0000
1 5
1.0000
RP
1 260.00
20.290
AC
1.000
260.00
5275
0
Forestry III
6310
LI
0
0
1.0000
5
1.0000
RP
250.00
3.770
AC
1.000
250.00
943
0
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
24.060
6,220
https://tax.cabarruscounty.us/AppraisaICard.aspx?Parcel=56336990190000 1 /1

Appraisal Card
CABARRUS COUNTY. INC
9/29/2020 11:18:32 AM
BRANTLEY LEWIS K TRUST BRANTLEY SADIE S TRUST Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel: 5633 67 7714 0000
5495 OLD SALISBURY-CONCORD RD KANNAPOLIS NC 28083 PLAT: 00000/00000
39010 ID NO: 05 001 0082.00 0000
COUNTY TAX (100), MT MITCHELL FIRE TAX (100) CARD NO. 1 of 1
Reval Year: 2020 Tax Year: 2020 TR 3 L K BRANTLEY ESTATE 63.4000 AC SRC= Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 06/29/2020 50031 I85 AT LANE STREET TW-05 CI-00 FR-09 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20200629
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
MARKET VALUE
DEPRECIATION
CORRELATION OF VALUE
TOTAL POINT VALUE I
I Eff.
BASE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTSUSEMOD
Area QUAL
RATE
RCNEYB
YB
REDENCETO
OTAL ADJUSTMENT
Oil
00
1 1
1
1
1
1 % GOOD
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD 0
TYPE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEPR. OB/XF VALUE - CARD 0
MARKET LAND VALUE - CARD 1,013,920
FACTOR
OTAL QUALITY INDEX
STYLE:
OTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 1,013,920
OTAL APPRAISED VALUE - CARD 1,013,920
OTAL APPRAISED VALUE - PARCEL 1,013,920
OTAL PRESENT USE VALUE - PARCEL 16,480
OTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 997,440
OTAL TAXABLE VALUE - PARCEL $ 16,480
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE 0
BXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 954,860
PRESENT USE VALUE 15,370
DEFERRED VALUE 939,490
OTAL VALUE 954,860
PERMIT
CODE I DATE NOTE I NUMBER AMOUNT
ROUT: WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD
DATE
DEED
INDICATE SALES
BOOK
PAGE
MOjYR
TYPE
/U
VII
PRICE
05979
0287
5
12005
QC
E
V
0
05979
0280
5
12005
QC
I E I
V
0
HEATED AREA
NOTES
AC APPEALED 1999 REVAL NC
SUBAREA UNIT ORIG % SIZE I ANN DEP % OB/XFDEPR.
GS RPL CODE UALITYDESCRIPTIONCOUNTLTHWTHUNITS PRICE COND BLDG# FACT YBEYB RATE OVRCOND VALUE
TYPE AREA % CS OTALOB/XFVALUE 0
FIREPLACE
SUBAREA
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND
LAND
TOTAL
HIGHEST AND
USE
LOCAL
FRON
DEPTH
LND
COND
NOTES
ROAD
UNIT
LAND
UNT
TOTAL
ADJUSTED
LAND
OVERRIDE
LAND
BEST USE
CODE
ZONING
TAGE
DEPTH
/ SIZE
MOD
FACT
RF AC LC TO OT
TYPE
PRICE
UNITS
TYP
ADJST
UNIT PRICE
VALUE
VALUE
NOTES
OFFICE
0400
OI
1210
0
0.8180
7
0.3200
+02 -40 +00 -30 +00
RP
65,000.00
25.150
AC
0.262
17,030.00
428305
0
INDUSTRIAL
0600
LI
390
0
0.8490
6
0.2800-02
-40 +00 -30 +00
RP
70,000.00
32.450
AC
0.238
16,660.00
540617
0
SFR
0100
1 LDR
996
1 0
1 0.9580
8
0.4500
+10 -40 +00 -10 -15
1 RP
18,000.00
5.800
AC
0.431
7,758.00
44996
OSHP
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
63.400
1,013,920
Forestry II
6210
OI
0
RP
260.00
25.150
AC
1.000
260.00
6539
0
210LI0
E
t10000000
t5l
RP
260.00
32.450
AC
1.000
260.00
8437
6210
LDR
0
RP
260.00
5.800
AC
1.000
260.00
1508
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
63.400
16,480
https://tax.cabarruscounty.us/AppraisaICard.aspx?Parcel=56336777140000 1 /1

Appraisal Card
CABARRUS COUNTY. INC
9/29/2020 11:19:02 AM
RAMSEUR TIMOTHY SCOTT RAMSEUR MARIE B/WIFE Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel: 5633 67 7240 0000
2989 BRANTLEY RD KANNAPOLIS NC 28083 PLAT: 00000/00000
5758925 ID NO: 05 001 0082.10 0000
COUNTY TAX (100), MT MITCHELL FIRE TAX (100) CARD NO. 1 of 1
Reval Year: 2020 Tax Year: 2020 P/O LOT 2 L K BRANTLEY EST 6.1600 AC SRC= Owner
Appraised by RE on 01/19/2016 06001 NEW GILEAD TW-05 CI-00 FR-09 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20200117
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
MARKET VALUE
DEPRECIATION
CORRELATION OF VALUE
Foundation - 3
Eff.
BASE
I Standard 0.18000
Continuous Footing 5.00
USE
MOD
Area
QUAL
RATE
RCN
EYB
AYB
CREDENCE TO MARKET
Sub Floor System - 4
01RI
01
1 3,015 1
124 1
99.20
1301838
2002
1992
% GOOD 82.0
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD 247,513
Plywood 8.00
TYPE: SINGLE FAMILY RURAL SINGLE FAMILY HOME
DEPR. OB/XF VALUE - CARD 2,050
MARKET LAND VALUE - CARD 90,700
Exterior Walls - 21
Face Brick 35.00
STYLE: 5 - Ranch w/ basement
TOTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 340,260
Roofing Structure - 03
Gable 7.00
Roofing Cover - 03
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - CARD 340,260
Asphalt or Composition 3.00
°
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE -PARCEL 340,260
Shingle
x no x
Interior Wall Construction - 5
Drywall/Sheetrock 26.00
rs°
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE - PARCEL 0
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 0
Interior Wall Construction - 6
Custom Interior 0.00
c 1°
i
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE - PARCEL $ 340,260
Interior Floor Cover - 08
PRIOR
Sheet Vinyl 6.00
'
Interior Floor Cover - 14
BUILDING VALUE 218,750
Carpet 0.00
INSLAND
OBXF VALUE 1,660
VALUE 86,920
Heating Fuel - 04
Electric 1.00
�' �c
PRESENT USE VALUE 0
DEFERRED VALUE 0
Heating Type - 10
Heat Pum 4.00
TOTAL VALUE 307,330
Air Conditioning Type - 03
Central 4.00
�� 4.
t x s�
Bedrooms/Bathrooms/Half-
Bathrooms
ro°
PERMIT
3/2/1 13.000
°
Ti1
Bedrooms
CODE I DATE I NOTE I NUMBER AMOUNT
BAS - 3 FUS - 0 LL - 0
Bathrooms
BAS - 2 FUS - 0 LL - 0
ROUT: WTRSHD:
Half -Bathrooms
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD
DATE
DEED
INDICATE
SALES
BAS - 1 FUS - 0 LL - 0
Office
BAS - 0 FUS - 0 LL - 0 0
11
t° tl1Y
yr
BOO PAGE
MOYR
TYPE Q/U
/
PRICE
TOTAL POINT VALUE 1112.000
00859 0446
4
11992
WD I
Q
I V
1 38000
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS
Quality
4
Above
1.1000
Average
'°
R
HEATED AREA 2,240
Sha a/Desi n
3
MF3
1.0000
Size
Size
Size
1.0100
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.110
NOTES
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX 12
Click on image to enlarge
PMT 5817 5/92 HSE APPEALED VALUE 1/95
SUBAREA
410DDRIVE
SCRIPTION
COUNT
LTH
WTH
UNIT
UNIT
PRICE
ORIG %
COND
BLDG#
SIZE
FACT
AYB
EYB
ANN DEP
RATE
OVR COND
%
OB/XF DEPR.
VALUE
TYPE
GS AREA
%
RPL CS
BAS
2,240
100
222208
CON
IVE CON
30
1
26
15
780
210
4.20
4.20
100
100
1
1
0.93
1.20
19921998
19981998
S5
SS
50
50
1523
529
FGD
62
045
27875
FOP
224
035
7738
TOTAL OB/XF VALUE 2,052
FSP
144
040
575
PTO
320
005
1587
UBM
1,208
020
24006
UGB
1 40010251
9920
FIREPLACE 3 - 1 Story 2,750
Single
SUBAREA
5,160
301,838
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS FGD=W24S26E24N26Area:624;BAS=N6W8N3W8N2W20S6W28S31E16S2E10E38N28Area:2240;FSP=N6W12S12E12N6Area:144;FOP=S8E28N8W28Area:2
224;UBM=N37W20S6W28S11E20S20E28Area:1208;PTO=N16E20S16W20Area:320;UGB=W20S20E20N20Area:400;TotalArea:5160
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND
LAND
TOTAL
HIGHEST AND
USE
LOCAL
FRON
DEPTH
LND
COND
NOTES
ROAD
UNIT
LAND
UNT
TOTAL
ADJUSTED
LAND
OVERRIDE
LAND
BEST USE
CODE
ZONING
TAGE
DEPTH
/ SIZE
MOD
FACT
RF AC LC TO OT
TYPE
PRICE
UNITS
TYP
ADJST
UNIT PRICE
VALUE
VALUE
NOTES
RURAL AC
0120
1 OI
379
1 0
1 1.2270
4
1.0000
+00 +00 +00 +00
RP
1 12,000.00
6.160
AC
1.227
14,724.00
90700
0
+00
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
6.160
90,700
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
https://tax.cabarruscounty.us/AppraisaICard.aspx?Parcel=56336772400000 1 /1

f[N1NRlNI fit
CABARRUS COUNTY. NC
Appraisal Card
10/29/2020 12:51:00 PM
FARI LLC Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel: 5633 58 9976 0000
5808 ROYCE ST KANNAPOLIS NC 28083 PLAT: 00000/00000 UNIQ ID 8609
20977 ROYCE APPAREL INC ID NO: 05 001 0095.00 0000
COUNTY TAX (100), KANNAPOLIS CITY TAX (100) CARD NO. 1 of 1
Reval Year: 2020 Tax Year: 2020 SOUTH SIDE LANE ST 16.4400 AC SRC= Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 03/26/2020 50031 I85 AT LANE STREET TW-05 CI-04FR-00 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20200326
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
MARKET VALUE
DEPRECIATION
CORRELATION OF VALUE
Foundation - 4
Eff.
BASE
Standard 0.34000
Spread Footing 8.00
USE
MOD
1 Area QUAL
RATE
RCN
EYB
AYB
REDENCE TO MARKET
Sub Floor System - 2
48 1
0
136,8881
91
1 42.77
1577699
1996
1996
% GOOD 66.0
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD 1,041,280
Slab on Grade- 8.00
TYPE: WAREHOUSE
- STORAGE WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL
DEPR. OB/XF VALUE - CARD 30,050
Residential/Commercial
STYLE: 1 - 1.0 Story
MARKET LAND VALUE - CARD 483,910
rOTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 1,555,240
Exterior Walls - 24
Modular Metal 20.00
Roofing Structure - 09
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - CARD 1,555,240
Rigid Frame w/Bar Joist 16.00
IV
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE -
PARCEL 1,555,240
Roofing Cover - 12
Metal 8.00
Interior Wall Construction - 1
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE -
Masonry or Minimum 5.00
0
PARCEL
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 0
Interior Floor Cover - 03
Concrete Finished 2.00
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE - PARCEL $ 1,555,240
Heating Fuel - 03
Gas 1.00
PRIOR
Heating Type - 05
BUILDING VALUE 906,810
Radiant Ceiling Heat 3.00
]N
BXF VALUE 29,830
LAND VALUE 372,320
Air Conditioning Type - 01
None 0.00
1I711 ■1
PRESENT USE VALUE 0
DEFERRED VALUE 0
OTAL VALUE 1,308,960
Structural Frame - 06
Steel 15.00
Ceiling & Insulation - 11
No Ceiling - Roof and Wall 3.00
PERMIT
Insulated
CODE I DATE I NOTE I NUMBER AMOUNT
Average Rooms Per Floor - 11
Average Rooms Per Floor 0.00
ROUT: WTRSHD:
Half -Bathrooms
SALES DATA
BAS - 0 FUS - 0 LL - 0
Plumbing Fixtures
OFF.
INDICATE
8.00 2.000
RECORD
DATE
DEED
TYPE
/U
/
SALES
PRICE
Office
BOO
PAGE
MOYR
01636
01249
045040093
0099
0247
5
5
5
11996
1994
2003
WD
WD
GW
Q
Q
A
V
V
I
300000
100000
0
BAS - 0 FUS - 0 LL - 0
0
�S.
f IF,
n
TOTAL POINT VALUE 91.000
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS
Non-Std Wall
14 Non-Std
Wall
1.0000
Height
Height
Inw111
IN
" s
r
BUILDING AREA 34,152
Quality
3
Average
1.0000
Shape/ Desi n
3
MF3
1.0000
NOTES
Size
Size
Size
1.0000
FS 2015 $1,500,000 EASEMENTPMT 32122 9/99
OMM ADD
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.000
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX 91
9X
N APPUD 99 & 08 REVALS AOF = 2 FLR 252
N
PMT 20340 1/97 OFF UPFIT
Click on image to enlarge
SUBAREA
DESCRIPTION
COUNT
LTH
WTH
UNITS
UNIT I
PRICE
ORIG %
COND
BLDG#
SIZE
FACT
AYB
EYB I
ANN DEP
RATE OVR
%
COND
OB/XFDEPR.
VALUE
GS
CODE
PAVING
PAVING
ASP
CON
0
0
0
0
18,250
1,250
2.75
3.40
100
100
1
1
1.10
1.15
19971998
19971998
SS
SS
50
50
27603
244
TYPE
AREA
%
RPL CS 09
OF
252200
21556 10
BAS
29,19
100
1248456 TOTAL
OB/XF VALUE 30,047
CAN
430030
5517
FOF
4,71
150
302170
FIREPLACE 1-None 0
SUBAREA
34,582
1,577,699
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS FOF=N31W35N12W21S10W18S5W76S28E32E118Area:4710;BAS=N43E40N120W190S166E76N5E18N10E21S12E35Area:29190;CAN=S5E86N5W86Area:4
430;AOF=Area:252;TotalArea:34582
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND
LAND
TOTAL
HIGHESTAND
USE
LOCAL
FRON
DEPTH
LND
COND
NOTES
ROAD
UNIT
LAND
UNT
TOTAL
ADJUSTED
LAND OVERRIDE
LAND
BEST USE
CODE
ZONING
TAGE
DEPTH
/ SIZE
MOD
FACT
RF AC LC TO OT
TYPE
PRICE
UNITS
TYP
ADJST
UNIT PRICE
VALUE
VALUE
NOTES
INDUSTRIAL
0600
I-1
340
0
1.0390
6
0.8700
+07 +00 -10 +00 -10
PS
70,000.00
2.050
AC
0.904
63,280.00
129724
0
IND. EXCESS
06EX
I-1
60
0
1.0390
6
0.2700 -03
+00 -10 -40 -20
PS
70,000.00
11.390
AC
0.281
19,670.00
224041
0
LAND
ULT ISSUES
COMM. EXCESS
07EX
C-2 1
60
1 0
1 1.0490
7
0.2300 -07
+00 -30 -20 -20
PS
180,000.00
3.000
AC
0.241
43,380.00
130140
0
LAND I
I
1
ULT ISSUES
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
16.440
483,910
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
https://tax.cabarruscounty.us/AppraisalCard.aspx?Parcel=56335899760000 1 /1

`pike- `lyzillf
View All Cards Next Card
Appraisal Card
CABARRUS COUNTY. NC
12/28/2020 4:02:45 PM
RESURRECTION BAPTIST CHURCH Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel: 5633 78 6266 0000
5615 OLD SALISBURY-CONCORD RD KANNAPOLIS NC 28083 PLAT: 00070/00015
118826 ID NO: 05 003 0005.00 0000
COUNTY TAX (100), MT MITCHELL FIRE TAX (100) CARD NO. 1 of 2
Reval Year: 2020 Tax Year: 2020 NORTHWEST SIDE OLD CONCORD-SALISBURY RD 3.5510 AC SRC= Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 05/10/2018 50031 I85 AT LANE STREET TW-05 CI-00 FR-09 EX-1 AT- LAST ACTION 20191212
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
MARKET VALUE
DEPRECIATION
CORRELATION OF VALUE
Foundation - 4
Spread Footing 6.00 USE
MOD
Eff.
Area
QUAL
BASE
RATE
RCN
EYB
AYB
Standard 0.70000
CREDENCE TO MARKET
Sub Floor System - 2
Slab on Grade- 5.00
Residential/Commercial
71
04
4,161
101
135.34
563150
1980
1956
% GOOD 30.0
DEPR. BUILDING VALUE - CARD 168,950
TYPE: CHURCH OFFICE CONSTRUCTION
STYLE: 1 - 1.0 Story
+ - - - - - - - 3 6 - - - - - - - - +
I BAS I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
7 7
2 2
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
+ - - 1 4 - - + - 8 - + - - 1 4 - - +
6 F O P 6
+- 8-+
DEPR. OB/XF VALUE - CARD 0
MARKET LAND VALUE - CARD 374,350
TOTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 543,300
Exterior Walls - 21
Face Brick 25.00
Roofing Structure - 03
Gable 7.00
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - CARD 543,300
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - PARCEL 563,680
Roofing Cover - 03
Asphalt or Composition Shingle 2.00
Interior Wall Construction - 3
Plastered 22.00
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE - PARCEL 0
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 0
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE - PARCEL $ 563,680
Interior Floor Cover - 12
Hardwood 12.00
Heating Fuel - 02
Oil, Wood or Coal 0.00
PRIOR
Heating Type - 04
Forced Air - Ducted 5.00
BUILDING VALUE 165,170
OBXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 374,350
PRESENT USE VALUE 0
DEFERRED VALUE 0
TOTAL VALUE 539,520
Air Conditioning Type - 03
Central 6.00
Commercial Heat & Air - 1
None 0.00
Structural Frame - 02
Wood Frame 5.00
Ceiling & Insulation - 08
Not Suspended - No Insulation 2.00
Average Rooms Per Floor - 1
Average Rooms Per Floor 0.00
PERMIT
CODE I DATE NOTE I NUMBER AMOUNT
Floor Number - 01
Floor 0.00
ROUT: WTRSHD:
Half -Bathrooms
BAS - 0 FUS - 0 LL - 0
SALES DATA
Plumbing Fixtures
2.00 1.000
OFF.
RECORD
DATE
DEED
TYPE
/U
VII
INDICATE
SALES PRICE
Office
BAS - 0 FUS - 0 LL - 0 0
BOO
PAGE
MO
R
12727
12090
0036
0197
10
8
2017
2016
GW
GW
E
E
I I
I
1 0
285000
TOTAL POINT VALUE 98.000
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS
BUILDING AREA 5,184
Quality
3 1
Average 1.0000
Shape/Design
1 3
MF3 1.0000
Size
ISizel
Size 11.0300
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.030
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX 101
NOTES
EST
SUBAREA
UALIT
DESCRIPTIONCOUNTLTHWTHUNITS
UNIT
PRICE
ORIG %
COND
jBLDG*l
SIZE
FACT
YBEYB
ANN DEP
RATE
OVRCOND
%
OB/XFDEPR.
VALUE
TYPE
GS
AREA
%
CODE
RPL CS TOTAL
OB/XF VALUE 0
BAS
2,592100
350801
FBM
2,592060
21045
FOP
48030
1895
FIREPLACE 1-None 0
SUBAREA
TOTALS
5,232
563,150
BUILDING DIMENSIONS BAS=W36S72E14FOP=S6E8N6W8$E22N72$FBM=2592$.
LAND INFORMATION
HIGHESTAND
BEST USE
USE
CODE
LOCAL
ZONING
FRON
TAGE
DEPTH
DEPTH
/ SIZE
LND
MOD
COND
FACT
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND
NOTES
RF AC LC TO OT
ROAD
TYPE
LAND
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
LAND
UNITS
UNT
TYP
TOTAL
ADJST
ADJUSTED
UNIT PRICE
LAND
VALUE
OVERRIDE
VALUE
LAND
NOTES
CHURCH
7100
1 LC
574
1 0
1 1.3940
4
1.0800
+08 +00 +00 +00 +00
RP
70,000.00
3.551
AC
1.506
105,420.00
374346
0
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA
3.551
374,350
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA
https://tax.cabarruscounty.us/AppraisalCard.aspx?Parcel=56337862660000 1 /1

State
Cowardin_Code I
HGM_Code I Meas
Amount I Units
Waters —Type NWPR_Determine_Code
Latitude
ongitude
I Local Waterway
Mjr6,_Vaters_Name
NORTH CAROLINA
W
797 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
35.49319400
-80.55872600
SCA-Int
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
1195 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.49184900
-80.55602200
SCB
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
281 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.49237300
-80.55836100
SCC
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
501 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.49155200
-80.55831800
SCD
NORTH CAROLINA
R5
Linear
2667 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
35.49637400
-80.55623700
SCE
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
632 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.49565800
-80.55542100
SCF
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
249 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
35.49658400
-80.55505700
WAA
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.021 ACRE
A4WETABUT
35.49177900
-80.55611800
WAB
NORTH CAROLINA
0.107 ACRE
35.49097500
-80.55852100
WAE
NORTH CAROLINA
0.107 ACRE
MWETABUT
MWETABUT
35.49097500
-80.55852100
WAF
NORTH CAROLINA
0.481 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.49251300
-80.55831700
WAG
NORTH CAROLINA
1P.668 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.49378800
-80.55978700
WAI
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.24 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.49515900
-80.55458400
WAJ
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.315 ACRE
MWETABUT
35.49684500
-80.55457300

Figures
• Figure 1 — Site Location Map
• Figure 2 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

CPO
_� ✓ �, 5
i Prje hip f'h ✓ \ ' . r• % rs
' • 6i6 �_ o ? �� .�... - - -, ,..,ice✓. / �� --
7.
+lark�S' Gli
• � � •,: tee- f
�'-' '', .���-''••-. ��' ~. - SITE ��-r�c`� •�� -�;
Lj
646
'�! � ���: --�� � 1/ �. C- V •� � yid . `"��
•,�'.7,ti \ 7d
�� r�' mow~ i .. .// � �-.- i ��, •�� /.i �_.� -.���
_ -111 �7351 rCb
1-.sr
171
a J 1�� .',`�� ` - ,� -Copy_right:©2013 National Geographic Society, i-c
TITLE
D ^ I 0 2,000 4,000 SITE LOCATION MAP
E 1 V SCALE IN FEET PRo E T PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
s
2989 BRANTLEY ROAD
'= KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
E
E
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP is 2923 southTryon street- suite 100
"' w hickman Charlotte, North Carolina28203
hart
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA 2013 w 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMARTER FNVRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
s QUADRANGLE DATE: 12/11/20 REVISION NO: 0
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) JOB NO: TCD-001 FIGURE NO: 1

POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WI
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S.
r
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAF)
y POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCC)
� r
� � : ram` � �a--"` - �' � • -�
ft
t
y�
1
14
TDN11 T �f ;7t •. _
11 I
46
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCD)
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAJ)
J
1q
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCF)
t
+k
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCE)
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAI)
i
i r
ar y" NOTE:
1. SC - STREAM CHANNEL
.i
+ LF - LINEAR FEET
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER OF THE U.S. (SCA) , 2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 8/26/20,
10/27/20, AND 12/28/20
Wow,
LEGEND
-SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
♦ STREAM POINT OF ORIGIN
TEST PIT
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL PERENNIAL STREAM
= H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL INTERMITTENT STREAM
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
STREAM CHANNEL ID
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (LF)
STREAM CHANNEL "A" (SCA)
797 (PERENNIAL)
STREAM CHANNEL "A" (SCA)
1,195 (INTERMITTENT)
STREAM CHANNEL "B" (SCB)
281
STREAM CHANNEL "C" (SCC)
501
STREAM CHANNEL "D" (SCD)
2,667
STREAM CHANNEL "E" (SCE)
632
STREAM CHANNEL "F" (SCF)
249
ON -SITE STREAM TOTAL
6,322
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
WETLAND AREA ID
APPROXIMATE AREA (ACRES)
WETLAND AREA "A" (WAA)
0.021
WETLAND AREA "B" (WAB)
0.341
WETLAND AREA "E" WAE
0.107
WETLAND AREA "I"'WAF
0.481
WETLAND AREA "G" (WAG)
0.668
WETLAND AREA "I" (WAI)
0.240
WETLAND AREA "J" (WAJ)
0.315
WETLAND TOTAL
2.173
c r 3. LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATE
AND WERE OBTAINED USING ATRIMBLE GPS UNIT
3� 4. SIZES OF SITE FEATURES WERE OBTAINED FROM
q�" r OAK ENGINEERING
P 5. ON -SITE FEATURES CONFIRMED BY KRYSTA STYGAR
WITH THE USACE ON DECEMBER 28, 2020.
r
APPROXIMATE
0 300 600
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. IWAA)-e SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
• _ PROJECT PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAB) _ 2989 BRANTLEY ROAD
KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
-4 2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart "sIIIIIi hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (t7
,',�'�• POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAE) SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 12/28/2020 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TCD-001 FIGURE NO. 2

Appendix A
Support Maps
• Cabarrus County GIS Map
• Water Supply Watershed Map
• NWI Map
• Soil Survey Maps
• FEMA Flood Map
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

A`r` INII
Cabarrus County Property Report
sn
w'
Q
Csnp i Okla Rd ,a
https://location.cabarruscounty.us/mapcabarrus/ 1 /2

NC Water Supply Watersheds
9/11/2020, 2:17:14 PM
Water Supply Watersheds
WS-11 P
0 WS-IVP
WS-IVC
=i
Ra%
Gab_
1:18,056
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),
NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Surface Water Classifications
NCDENR Div. Water Resources
City of Charlotte, County of Cabarrus, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA USGS

Wetlands
l " r
• - �° MtOhilltC�1E�i
'r
- SITE
F
oi
• r ,
tiiw•;•
LA
.� - ,• +A {,!, � ��� � � � � sue,- � ��; �•-.,
r
00
` �► -
SourceUSDA,
September 1, 2020
Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland ❑ Lake
❑ Estuarine and Marine Deepwater ❑ Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other
❑ Estuarine and Marine Wetland ❑ Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This page was produced by the NWI mapper

d6
i tmi
_44 7
IM04
AI
Al
jr
JA Alt
;o
sp
_Y Sk T
Yr
41L
All
. p P I 4L
.14
IL
1 kr
L
r
ME
dl
.4;
t
p
j
1#
L
P.
N
Wn A 4: 4
Ole
-jr: 'Ilk
4E
All
&
A&A lip
40,
4
p
S
Pkl
45. �
Nib, MIt —1
JI
L
ELF Ilk CA
e 11p
'lel
1A
- =_ ��++ 7F
r oe
ppl .4r
;2
L
Jp A.
%
19
-Ape
1p
AN
A klL%
X
4L
-dl
04,
'A
7
elf" ik
_Q
r
wr lop
4 OL
T
.dF IK'
It
owl
FOR
ff
7
., -pre 1 412'
o.r
a
AV i ccr=
AS.
W,
%
Ole
A00 qrr* qo 9w
A
%vb
all
lid
ASP 4
pr,
t
Alk,
p,
1k
Fall (PAO
51 4P
4h
Ic
17 op
k .1
JL L
I Ape _llllll,
p
to
V V6%
dl
like 0 40
Of Ll All,
Nl
0A
L
r
40.
sera,
7%
lei
3
llr
6 .l 7 O L

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
539800 539900 540000 540100 540200 540300 540400
35o 29' 54" N O
tro�yy
rf
g
ro
M
r
g
tb
r
r
r
35o 29' 20" N
539800 539900 540000 540100 540200 540300
b
M Map Scale: 1:5,180 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
$ N 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 250 500 1000 1y00
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
35o 29' 54" N
ro
g
ro
M
8
tb
r
r
r
35o 29' 20" N
1 /18/2021
Page 1 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating
Polygons
W
Hydric (100%)
0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
0
Not Hydric (0%)
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
~
Hydric (100%)
r 0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
r 0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
r 0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
r r
Not Hydric (0%)
r 0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
Hydric (100%)
Hydric (66 to 99%)
0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
Not Hydric (0%)
0
Not rated or not available
Water Features
x
Streams and Canals
Transportation
i--1-+ Rails
­0 Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Jun 2, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 18, 2011—Nov
20, 2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/18/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ChA
Chewacla sandy loam, 0
5
4.1
4.4%
to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
0
36.1
38.8%
percent slopes
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to
0
39.5
42.4%
15 percent slopes
MeB
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to
0
4.8
5.2%
8 percent slopes
PoD
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15
0
3.1
3.3%
percent slopes
PoF
Poindexter loam, 15 to
0
5.5
5.9%
45 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
93.2
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/18/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/18/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/18/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

N
Legend
Panels
0 Political Areas
Stream Centerline
Cross Sections
TTTTr Levee
Flood Hazard Areas
AE
FIoodway (AE)
0.2 % Chance Annual Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
a

Appendix B
Survey Field Forms
• DEQ DWR Stream Identification Forms
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Forms
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION5

6G4 Cperenni- l )
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -mod
Project/Site: LaYje ST
Latitude: 35x�131gq
Evaluator. D W r 1
County: Cg6ey_'-
Longitude: - 30.55S72,6
Total Points:
r a i
SStream is at least rnlermittent
�� S
Stream Determination (circle op!L
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
1 Other
e.g. Quad Name: Cori6orj
perennial ills 30•
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
FAbsent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Cy
2_ Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. in -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
-ripple-pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual "
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
R
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1)
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes f3D
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SGA �Ak,l
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1-16 -10
Project/Site: L vie, s f
Latitude: 35,Y91169
Evaluator: bum
County: CAA,-fus
Longitude: r$0, 556Oz2
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent 2-7
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30`
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
I e,g. Quad Name: Co'l Cord
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rile- ool sequence
0
1
�
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
T
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
D
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
anmciai dncnes arB nUL rated, see discussions in manuai
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
o-n
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
Co')0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods_ See p. 35 of manual,
Notes:
Sketch:

SCB
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2 Q
ProjectlSite: �ctsie Sr
Latitude: 73
Evaluator: 0
County: 6 Lpu S
Longitude: _WSJ $361
Total Points: �, r ,
Stream is at least intermittent `(
Stream Determinatiorti circle one)
Ephemeral In ermi en Perennial
Other
e g Quad Name: CoilCOPi
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30'
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I - )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
D
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1'
2
3
B. Neadcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
01 MUCII UHUICS if IfU4 [dtt: , see Ulsoussiuns in manuai
B. Hydrolow (Subtotal = 7 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
i
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
G. Biology {Subtotal = . 11
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5 1
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other D
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SGL
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -ZQ
Projectf5ite: bm G s�
Latitude: 35. y q IS j 5 2-
Evaluator:
�_ U r l
County: & Lqf- (A 5
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at leastifz intermittent30'
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
Other �"
e.g. Quad Name: w'jCo/
if;-, 19 or perennial if
r,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 'I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1°' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
D
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
�
01
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
(jj
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
m 11111.101 VIRd IGb 01G IIVI 101CV, bVU VIZA.UbblVllb In fnp111Jp1
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
D
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

,Sc D
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: $ -26 - 2. a
Project/Site'. LA4 a s t.
Latitude: 3 S. y g 63 7 y
Evaluator: R+H -Nm
County: ctIot(`US
Longitude: So,S56Z37
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent erenn a
e.g. Quad Name: o
L ej
c n,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_! )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1H' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
a3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
d
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
M
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
ED
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
arunGAal W[Grte5 are not rateu, see u15uu551on5 In manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 9 }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae -
U
0.5
1
1.5
26. Welland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 200
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

'C('F_
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -Z�-Z D
Project/Site: Lcine
Latitude: 3 S, 9
Evaluator: 44 ti W/A
County: C1r_,X�rus
Longitude:-'o,sSsyll
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2-6-5
Stream Determination circle one)
Ephemeral nfermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: CUJI Cd1'd
if a 19 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = G )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1*' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
Ct
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1 .
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
anun:rai uncnes arts nut rareu; see arsc,�ssions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = (?D" )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
d
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
a
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C. Biology {Subtotal = ,
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
co-P
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SL F
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: g - Z G ' Z Q
ProjectlSite: Lone v.
Latitude: 3 , � U 5FY
Evaluator:
County: &aLalus
Longitude:-$�r55.]057
Total Points:
Stream Is leastat intermittent
Stream Det ination clrcle one)
Ephemera Intermittent Perennial
Other
I e.g. Quad Name: C014 CC' I'd
perennial
if 19 or erenniat if 2 30'
W1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
CD
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
U11.110Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
01% l.rQr Gl Wrra7 arc rrul rrr rrrarruGr
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal= )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
0.5
U
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes - 3
C. Rolm (Subtotal = � )
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
UP
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
g
1 0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1=ACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other;0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-1
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.491587 Long:-80.556000 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
25
Yes
FACU
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2.
Juniperus virginiana
30
Yes
FACU
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 170 (A) 610 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.59
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
55
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
25
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-2
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.491779 Long:-80.556118 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 35
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
15
Yes
FACU
25
Yes
FAC
30
Yes
FAC
70 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 14
30 Yes FACU
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolata
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 35
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
70 Yes FACW
70 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
14
20 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FACU
10 Yes
FAC
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 70 x 2 = 140
FAC species 85 x 3 = 255
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 210 (A) 615 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.93
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
8-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-3
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.492119 Long:-80.556386 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-3
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
65
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
2.
Juniperus virginiana
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species 115 x 4 = 460
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 195 (A) 700 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.59
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
30
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
50
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-4
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.492050 Long:-80.556762 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 40
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACU
25
Yes
FAC
35
Yes
FAC
80 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
25 Yes FACU
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolata
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 30
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
60 Yes FACW
60 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
12
10 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FACU
5 Yes
FAC
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 190 (A) 565 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.97
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
6-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-5
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.492652 Long:-80.557309 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-5
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
2.
Juniperus virginiana
30
Yes
FACU
FACU species 110 x 4 = 440
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 220 (A) 770 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.50
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
60
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
25
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
55
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-6
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.492434 Long:-80.557556 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-6
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
15 No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
35 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1.
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
2.
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 145 (A) 420 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.90
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Woodwardia areolata
40 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
10 Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
25 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
4-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-7
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.492172 Long:-80.558392 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-7
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
2.
Juniperus virginiana
15
Yes
FACU
FACU species 105 x 4 = 420
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 195 (A) 690 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.54
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
45
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
9
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
25
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
55
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-8
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.492513 Long:-80.558317 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-8
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
40 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1.
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
2.
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 140 (A) 430 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.07
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Woodwardia areolata
20 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
15 Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
5 No
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
4-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-9
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.491115 Long:-80.558543 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-9
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
2.
Juniperus virginiana
15
Yes
FACU
FACU species 105 x 4 = 420
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 195 (A) 690 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.54
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
45
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
9
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
25
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
55
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-10
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.490975 Long:-80.558521 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-10
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 40
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolata
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
30
Yes
FACU
25
Yes
FAC
25
Yes
FAC
80 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
15 Yes FACW
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
3
10 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FACU
10 Yes
FAC
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
FACU species 40 x 4 = 160
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 125 (A) 400 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.20
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
4-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-11
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.493788 Long:-80.559787 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-11
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 43
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
40
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FAC
25
Yes
FAC
85 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
30 Yes FACU
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolata
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
40 Yes FACW
40 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
8
10 Yes
FAC
15 Yes
FACU
10 Yes
FAC
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
FACU species 85 x 4 = 340
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 190 (A) 615 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.24
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/2 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
5-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-12
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 34.493867 Long:-80.559626 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-12
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
2.
Juniperus virginiana
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 90 x 4 = 360
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 200 (A) 690 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.45
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
40
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
10
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
40
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
80
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-13
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.493465 Long:-80.558693 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-13
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 25
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
10
Yes
FACU
30
Yes
FAC
10
Yes
FAC
50 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 10
10 Yes FACU
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Woodwardia areolata
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
15 Yes FACW
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
3
10 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FACU
25 Yes
FAC
45 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 120 (A) 375 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.13
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
6-20 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-14
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.493666 Long:-80.558103 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-14
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
65
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
25
Yes
FACU
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
2.
Juniperus virginiana
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 95 x 4 = 380
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 185 (A) 650 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.51
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
35
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
30
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
55
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-14
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-15
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.494985 Long:-80.554680 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-15
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
65
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2.
Juniperus virginiana
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species 115 x 4 = 460
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 185 (A) 670 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.62
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
40
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
30
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
25
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
50
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-16
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.495159 Long:-80.554584 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-16
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1.
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2.
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 300 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.86
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Woodwardia areolata
15
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Typha angustifolia
10
Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
4-20 10YR 4/1 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-17
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.496845 Long:-80.554573 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-17
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5 No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
25 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1.
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
2.
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 115 (A) 340 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.96
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Woodwardia areolata
20 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
15 Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
15 Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-17
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/2 80
10YR 5/8 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
6-20 10YR 5/2 85
10YR 5/8 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-18
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.496749 Long:-80.554251 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: PoF - Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-18
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
2.
Juniperus virginiana
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 95 x 4 = 380
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 205 (A) 710 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.46
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
20
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
50
Yes
FAC
4.
5
Hydrophytic
90
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
45
20% of total cover:
18
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-18
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lane Street (TCD-001) City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 12-28-20
Applicant/Owner: Trammel Crow Company State: NC Sampling Point: TP-20
Investigator(s): Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.493441 Long:-80.553454 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB - Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydrology indicators.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-20
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 400 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Festuca arundinacea
100 Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This data does not appear to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-20
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Appendix C
Site Photographs
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVI ROHM ENTAL SOLUTIONS

' - ���' - � ' �k. �: s.__� .. .� 11 - -r�' �s �.}.e�J;e`r. 1�,��yi7• t
ay y�c
kwl.i
4.
31
�.•
r -t
R:! � �. L4 ,.,i . Y '•ate_ ".`"'' '1 � r; ��� -- .. .

R+�
1
trrS it 'teat'.. ■
`3