20201734 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210127

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201734
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Lane Street Industrial Development
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Dan McCauley
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1 /27/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Unnamed Tributary of Lake Fisher
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
WS-N;CA (Lake Fisher classification)
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.494405
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201734
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
11/11/2020
Longitude:
-80.556247
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
52.71 KB
A. Processing Information C^U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cabarrus

Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Untitled Extract Pages.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
4 Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Timothy & Marie Ramseur / Sadie S Brantley Trust / Fari LLC / Resurrection Baptist Church
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00859-0446 / 05979-0280 & 05979-0287 / 04504-0093 / 12727-0036
2c. Responsible party:
N/A / Dwight Richard Locklear / Sadruddin Roy / Timothy Jones
2d.Address
679.99KB
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
u

Street Address
2989 Brantley Road / P.O. Box 56 / 5808 Royce Street / 5615 Old Salisbury Concord Road
Address tine 2
city
State / Rovince / Iftion
Kannapolis / Landis / Kannapolis / Kannapolis
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28083 / 28088 / 28083 / 28083
Cabarrus
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
,[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
David Neuman
3b. Business Name:
TC MidAtlantic Development V, Inc c/o Trammel Crow Company
3c.Address
Street Address
3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 510
Address tine 2
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27612
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Dan McCauley
4b. Business Name:
Hart & Hickman
4c.Address
Street Address
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Ste. 301
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
0. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Certification of Authorization.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Kannapolis
2. Project Identification
2f. Fax Number:
Slate / province / Region
NC
C--*Y
Wake
3e. Fax Number:
State / Rovince / Pegion
NC
Country
Wake
4e. Fax Number:
81.37KB

2a. Property Identification Number:
56336990190000,56336777140000,
56336772400000, 56335899760000, and
2b. Property size:
56337862660000
100
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2989 Brantley Road & 5495 Old Salisbury -Concord Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Bwince / Rion
Kannapolis
NC
Postal / Zip (Dde
C xritry
28083
Cabarrus
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Unnamed Tributary of Lake Fisher
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-N;CA (Lake Fisher classification)
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located
030401050202
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Site consists of complete or portions of five parcels located at 2989 Brantley Road and 5615 and 5495 Old Salisbury -Concord Road in Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North
Carolina. The Site consists primarily of vacant, undeveloped land with a residence in the southern portion of the Site. Residential use is to the east, south, and west, and light industrial
use is to the north.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure-1.pdf 408.43KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure-3 SS.pdf 1.14MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.173
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
6,322
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project proposes to develop an industrial building to serve the City of Kannapolis and surrounding areas.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The planned development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare level building pads. Stormwater BMPs are included.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
TC Lane Street - WETLAND EXHIBIT_REV1.pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary f Approved r Not Verified r Unknown f WA
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01712
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dan McCauley
1.62MB
O Unknown

Agency/Consultant Company: Hart & Hickman
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
H&H met Ms. Krysta Stygar of the USACE on November 5, 2020 and December 28, 2020 for a site review.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Update PJD Request Lane Street Industrial (1-18-21).pdf 5.84MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type*(?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2C Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area
WAB Fill P Seep WAB Yes Corps 0.009
(acres)
WAG
Fill
L
Seep
WAG
Yes
Corps
0.078
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.087
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.087
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
SCA
Permanent
Fill
Trib of Lake Fisher
Intermittent
Corps3
Average (feet)
217
(linearfeet)
S2
SCD
Tem orar
P Y
Culvert
Trib of Lake Fisher
Perennial
Corps
P
4
Average (feet)
40
(linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
217
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
257
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
40
L.'
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
See Avoidance and Minimization Document Attached.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
See Avoidance and Minimization Document Attached.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
F DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
F Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee F Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
217
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
The applicant proposes 1.5:1 mitigation ratio for 217 If of intermittent stream impact
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
F Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
F Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
W Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
F Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r- Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r- Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r- No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r NSW r USMP W Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Kannapolis
Comments:
The site is subject to NCDEQ and City of Kannapolis post -construction stormwater management requirements. Multiple stormwater BMPs meeting all state and local requirements are
designed to treat and attenuate runoff from the developed site. The design includes permanently wet extended detention ponds with planted littoral shelves as well as dry extended
detention ponds with pretreatment sand filters. Construction sediment control will be provided to meet state and local requirements.
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r- Yes f• No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r- Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed site plan will develop the majority of the parcel and additional development is not anticipated. Additional phases and/or impacts to
Waters of the U.S. are not planned or proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r- Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater will enter City of Kannapolis sanitary sewer infrastructure and will be piped to an off -site City of Kannapolis wastewater treatment plant.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r- Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r- Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r- Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r- Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r- Yes r No
r- Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r- Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
DEQ Natural Heritage Program and Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) on-line databases and on -Site reconnaissance (See information and FWS response
letter attached)
Consultation Documentation Upload
49-12430-A - Lane Street Industrial - Limited NEPA Report.pdf 5.08MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes f• No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
hftp://wvAv.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
t^ Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office databases and on -site reconnaissance (See information and SHPO
response attached).
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
49-12430-A - Lane Street Industrial - Limited NEPA Report.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710563300K
Miscellaneous
Comments
5.08MB
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
C - Avoid and Minimize.pdf 27.08KB
NC SAM - SCA.pdf 208.78KB
Signature
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Dan McCauley
Signature
,J" �,.,l 55'
Date
1/27/2021
U

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Woody Coley
Trammell Crow Company
3700 Glenwood Ave., Suite 510
Raleigh, NC 27612
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 8, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/8/2021
Project: Lane Street Industrial County: Cabarrus
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040105
Warm Stream
400
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Matt Bramblett, agent
Sincerely,
Avw�t_&�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CAROLINAD_E
Department of Environ—tal quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Agent Certification of Authorization
I David Neuman , representing the prospective developer of lands represented by
Parcel Numbers 56336990190000, 56336777140000, 56336772400000, and portions of
56335899760000 and 56337862660000 in Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina (approx.
100 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart & Hickman, PC to act on the prospective developer's
behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination and 401/404 permitting for this property.
Prospective Applicant's Signature
Name/Title: David Neuman/ VP
Company: TC NHDATLANTIC
DEVELOPMENT V, INC.,
a Delaware limited liability company
Agent's Signature
Dan McCauley
Hart & Hickman, PC
12-17-2020
Date 12/22/2020 Date

"s
U r ,�
o
Fei rtl0
6i 6 _ 5 �o r'" • . -.-ram � � .. � ... _ • • ' �
� :��: � LLL - _:•���- _,. _ _ _ - - SITE �-�•;�� �-1 � •��
Ei rII' '� ?{� , •,
- N -
/�. li , �� - e $elk[ M •' �_.� . • t-7 f :�` t: �-
C
C.
0 2,000
"I SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA 2013
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
4,000

ry
�� � Qo y0•. � �� ( � � / � � I I �� /�� � � � k\/� � � ( � \ yyyy^c$J?�oeG
WETLAND AREA „J„
13,731 SF
INTERMITTENT STREAM
CHANNEL „F„
+249 LF
. / / Al Q /
WETLAND AREA I„ -' ( J o^ "'
`v 10,453 SF ��o .
INTERMITTENT STREAM�•�
/'') CHANNEL E 6 LF
32
���-- ��' ( (�� �- ,(✓ ��
�\� o, � � : �/: � , /�i // �� � � � ) V '�_ �=�� �' �. �yJ�•. �/--cam -
PERENNIAL STREAM
�� CHANNEL D � �.�� �- ����
/ .�' �.. Ads \ \
±1,338 LF ON BRANTLEY PROPERTY
L -
r,
z 7
.i .
\ / �_ � ^� � \� (1\ )` ... .. i. • .. .•. S ... _ ... r--. Y .., ,., .. .1X `yJ}, C:"` S.4Xw;r �:1y::..
s v
t ,
I ♦ 1'i
r. 2. .
>
.,.. Y
r
.t.�t.
1 1
�Sr
2 ,s.
`f ..tom'-Y . ... .. , .�....::,... .•.yr`.t. .. >......-:' �
h 7{// " � ,�� \ \ � I < J/ /�� ( /1 f -: " .... ... << - F::....... .... l ` (\ l 11 � —�i _�
rj
pom. s. ma, x
CON/SPAN O-Series DYOB
PRELIMINARY
N6T FORGONb1nl1L"IION
�- CONTEvn {�• PRERLIMIN�ARY
' 0635: 35'-0" Span. 8'-1" 3ise
O 9
y
�I
PROPOSED BUILDING o
4 / �� � (
Q��' �`° f l' `•�\ \� 1 \ \� I I � -- ` J � ) � 1300 x 580
I \� \ `� �' ' ( — �\ I �754,000-SF r '1 \ \ \
�r/ FFE: TBD
✓� f— � � % / \ 1 � � � � � I � � �� ��� � 1 � � , � � \ / � � _ _ � � � \ � I � ` ,r.� ,,� _ � � � "- � \ > ���^a���v tiro
f, �(� �\l � � ` — (� \ � f � � � -�— + 217 LF OF PERMANENT IMPACT
\ f
SF OF PERMANENT IMPACT / /� \ TO INTERMITTENT STREAM CHANNEL A"
TO WETLAND AREA B \ L�—
1
1
.r
-
i ) �
( t:r
1 1 �
- ��y} �_�`�:•.. , . ::;''•-:.Y=� 4 DIA CONCRETE MH
. I
Y •
h
n
t
1 1 1
.. ,.. ,. r.-. ,r.s -... -. .... ..
7 I
PR P EDB TT MLE L ERT HEAD ALL i.�-< ETLA DAREA B O OS O O SS CU V & W S � 1 _ .. .. , W N • -`
a a v t.
Z
I ..
Q Tj
4 LF F TEMP RARY IMPA T A IATED � I ,:.: ;,;--:�:' , , �. •..s.-;:. + -�.. >.t' ..r,•-:.._.,.,. o
� 0 O O C S SSOC � �1 j ;a:; ,;;,, <; _ -:- <�;.' _19,035 SF TOTAL 75 LF OF 18 RCP 1.00%
f. .
l �. \ \
w TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING., � � /( �.: ,;:,;•._. ,� : .. ;�;�w;"%�.:� ±18 638 SF TO REMAIN 1
NO PERMANENT IMPACTS. �/ J '�`f;:?';t :":.; :y .<,;.;�..; / �/ / \ �J
INTERMITTENT STREAM\\ / ✓ f
CHANNELA \ �� ✓ \
n f 125 LF OF 8-INCH WRAPPED PERFORATED U.D.
\
AN 1` N ±1,195 LF \ / :; •.: ;,<.. ::' .:..:::': .:��� �f �� J EMBEDDED IN 2'x2' CHANNEL OF WASHED STONE \ \
8" RCP FES �� 1
/ PERENNIAL STREAM 3,395 SF OF PERMANENT IMPACT /IE
/� jJ / TO WETLAND AREA „G„ /r'
CHANNEL „D„ 1 (�/ / / l/ -� ✓ ( - - / J
\% y /J / 1 '� +1 329 LF ON "FART LLC" PARCEL
/J
Ll
v ��/ ii X\\ ✓ 1 - r
, /
�/ ✓ --'�) V _ / / % '� PEE# /� �� i� �C v / /
//
� 7111 P
)� � ✓ � � � �� �/ . �'" � — ,� � /// /ram —,�� - \ � �-�—\ �✓ .� ) � � \
���� INTERMITTENT STREAM V \ ( \ \
±281 LF \ ��
�� � � � � /-- -- ���/� j✓ / WETLAND AREA G .- �T �-- , � ��� � �\
REMAIN)
INTERMITTENT STREAM
�L -\ - ✓ ���� � � � / �-PERENNIALCHANNEL „C„
STREAM i� �- � � � \ /,.�
✓ " / �Y %// �/ �f �� V� f ����
�// �✓ �� CHANNEL "A" \ �\ �� ±501 LF j+797 LF
�
WETLAND AREA „E,I
+6,526 SF
/
/
/
/
�/�idoe
00aw
ICY
I ado
\40
i
^Fti tiJG
I(` 46oy
I \ APO 41
= Z410 F
Q = l
\
.4
UPSTREAM ENO ELEVATION
fz
a b.
:::-
DOWNSTREAM END ELEVATION
PRELIMINARY
/�y���7!�/��.�• ������ N6T FORGONb1Rl1L110N
N� C ' — 0635: 35'-D" Span x 8'-1" fuse
0-SERIES.
••••••••••,••�••••••`•• dbroiie eiaaseoeo euusTaur.� f3Y- OcB
--- aran,a oun
---- ----- ---- ---- - - ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- -
aq
$LCTIUN A -A
CROSS SECTION
PRELIMINARY
NOTroacoNs>RucnaN
--..�- r�
— --- --
_ __tee
WNMC�• /�
•m.u,
��
' `•""' BstAN
U-SERIES
0635: 35'-3" Span x 8'-1" Rlge
'
oro4
w 80
0
Z
Lu
w
Z
z
Lu
V)
a
N N
04
N �
Z�
�z
oW
�U
VEk�
�Qv
QZ�
D p °o
O
�0
o- Z
N
PE SEAL:
�.� N CAR '•
••..•••••
♦ O �••�ESS/�iL••� ��
2 SEAL r i
33996
�4.-
., RY T �•`
100 0 100
SCALE: 1 " = 100'
m
x
W
V
a Q
J
O Z
V �
t— O
Lu
W�
'u0 W
w Z cc
Z
WQ
J
LuJ O-
z
Z �
Z z
se Q
W Z
W
O
O
W
W
rl
3
J Lu ^
mco
0
Lu
LLL
Lu Z 0
Z \ LuN
5se
u
Lur
w
Z
Luiy Lu
0 =
O
Ln
V
�
Lu

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed Lane Street Industrial Development
2989 Brantley Road & 5495 Old Salisbury -Concord Road
Kannapolis, North Carolina
H&H Job No. TCD-001
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed development is located south of Lane Street and west of Old Salisbury -Concord
Road in Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The Site consists of all or portions of
five tax parcels (Cabarrus County Parcel Numbers 56336990190000, 56336777140000,
56336772400000 and portions of 56335899760000 and 56337862660000) that total
approximately 100 acres.
ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) reviewed State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species
databases for the Site and conducted a screening survey of the Site and surrounding area for
Federal Threatened and Endangered Species, and none were identified. ECS also reviewed the
National Registry of Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Cabarrus County, North
Carolina; the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer; and the
Site and surrounding area via visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic,
cultural, and/or archeological sites. No recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the Site. No
significant structures were observed on -Site. ECS requested comment on the Site from the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Natural Heritage Program (NHP), and NC
SHPO. Agency responses are included in Appendix D.
The Site is ideally zoned as industrial. The building footprint has been designed to primarily
occupy upland areas to avoid on -Site Waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable. An
additional 0.7 acre portion of land was purchased in December 2020 in order to further reduce
stream impacts.
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable. The Site building, parking areas, and stormwater management
areas have been designed to primarily occupy upland areas. Furthermore, impacts are proposed
1 harthickman
S:\AAA-Mag:erPrcjects\Trmrne11 Crow Company - TCD\TCD-001 (Wetlands)\Permitting\PCN Application\Update 1-25-2021\C -Avoid and Minimize.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

to only 4% of the on -Site wetlands and 3% of the on -Site streams. No permanent impacts to
perennial streams are proposed.
A previously designed Preliminary Site Plan prepared by Oak Engineering indicates that the
developer originally proposed a significantly larger building and additional parking areas. The
footprint of the proposed warehouse building has been reduced by approximately 300,000 sq ft.
In addition, certain former parking areas have been removed, and infrastructure has been shifted
to avoid placing stormwater management structures in Waters of the U.S.. The Final Site Plan
and Preliminary Site Plan are included in Appendix B.
To further minimize Site impacts, the Site plan was designed to avoid impacting Stream Channel
`D' through the proposed construction of a bottomless culvert. The developer elected to incur
the costs associated with a bottomless culvert in order to prevent additional permanent impacts to
on -Site streams.
During Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed.
Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction Site perimeter and along stream
boundaries.
Mitigation
Mitigation is typically required by the USACE Nationwide Permit 39 for impacts greater than
150 linear feet of stream. Due to the planned permanent impacts to 217 linear feet of on -Site
streams, compensatory mitigation is proposed in the form of purchasing mitigation credits from
DEQ's Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in -lieu fee program. The DEQ DMS acceptance
letter is attached in Appendix F.
A North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (SAM) form has been conducted for the on -Site
intermittent portion of SCA. The SAM form is attached in Appendix G. The overall SAM
rating for the intermittent stream is low quality. Because the intermittent portion of SCA is of
low quality, a mitigation ratio of 1.5:1 is proposed. At a 1.5:1 mitigation ratio, 326 linear feet of
mitigation is proposed for impacts to the intermittent portion of SCA via in -lieu fee purchase.
2 hart' hickman
S:\AAA-Mag:erPrcjects\Trmrne11 Crow Company - TCD\TCD-001 (Wetlands)\Permitting\PCN Application\Update 1-25-2021\C -Avoid and Minimize.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Because the impacts to on -Site wetlands are minimal (0.087 acre) and less than 0.1-acre,
compensatory mitigation for wetland impact is not proposed.
3 hart' hickman
S:\AAA-Mag:erPrcjects\Trmrne11 Crow Company - TCD\TCD-001 (Wetlands)\Permitting\PCN Application\Update 1-25-2021\C -Avoid and Minimize.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch oftheassessment area and photographs. Attach acopyofthe USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circlethe location ofthestream reach under evaluation. If multiplestream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on theattached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual fordetailed descriptions
and explanations ofrequested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual forexamples ofadditional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Projectname (ifany): Lane Street Industrial
3. Applicant/ownername: Trammell Crow Company
5. County: Cabarrus
7. Riverbasin: Yadkin-PeeDee
2. Date ofevaluation: 8/26/20
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad:
DWM - Hart & Hickman. PC
Lake Fisher
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lowerend of assessment reach): 35.491849,-80.556022
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SCA - Intermittent 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 300
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 ❑ Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑ No
14. Feature type: ❑ Perennial flow 10 Intermittent flow []Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) 10Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) []Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) El Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EZYes []No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessmentarea.
❑Section10water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑1 ❑11 ❑III 10IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/OutstandingResourceWaters
❑ Publicly owned property ❑ NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromousfish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence ofa federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (listspecies)
1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throug houtassessment reach.
®B No flow, water in pools only.
❑ C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrictthe channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, mod ification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile —assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
to Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% ofchannel unstable
❑ B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
ER > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction —streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditionsthatadverselyaffect reference interaction
®B to Moderate evidenceofconditions(examples: berms, levees, d own -cutti ng, ag g rad ation, d red gi ng) that ad versely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flowsthrough streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evid ence of cond itio ns that ad versely affect reference i nteractio n (little to no flood p lain/i ntertid al zo ne access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] ortoo much flood plain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors —assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oilsheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features orintertidalzone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessivealgaeinstream orintertidalzone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑ 1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or2streams, D1 droughtor higher is considered adrought; for Size 3 or4 streams, D2 droughtor higher is considered adrought.
❑A Droughtconclitions and no rainfall or rainfall notexceeding 1 inch withinthe last48 hours
❑B Droughtconditionsand rainfall exceeding 1inch within the last48hours
®C No droughtconditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerousto assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streams ide Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes
®No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if> 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses W
❑F 5% o ysters o r oth er n atural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑ B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 8
ElH Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y
El Sand bottom
❑ C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) 2
El 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑ D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots U 2
❑ K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
C9E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section(evaluate11d)
toC Natural bed form absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all thatoccur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should notexceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bed rock/sap ro lite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 —256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SiIt/cIay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes 0No Are poo Is filled with sed iment? (skip for Size 4Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life —assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Eyes ❑ No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasonsand skip to Metric 13. ❑ No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
>1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑Adultfrog s
[]Aquatic reptiles
[]Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ Cad d i sfly larvae (T)
[]Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ Stonefly larvae (P)
❑Tipulid larvae
❑ Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition —streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider forthe Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacitywith regard to both overbankflow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority ofthe streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_ 6 inches deep
❑ B ❑ B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions ableto pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do notconsiderwetlands o utside of the streamsi d e area or within the normal
wetted perimeter ofassessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamsid e area?
❑N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wetcletention basins; do not include sediment basins ordry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessmentarea (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -released am, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sedimentifpresent)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors —assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withd rawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow d uring low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertig ht d am, sed iment d eposit)
❑C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface forwatershed)
®D Evid ence that the streamsid e area has been modified resulting in accelerated d rai nag e i nto the assessment reach
❑ E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F No ne of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consideraspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A NA ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑ B ❑ B ❑ B ❑ B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
El ❑C ❑C El From 30 to < 50 feet wide
El ❑D ❑D El From 10to < 30 feetwide
El ❑E ❑E El < 10 feet wideorno trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
El ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
El ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with orwithouta strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑ D ❑ D Maintained shrubs
El ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does notabut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑ B ❑ B ❑ B ❑ B ❑ B ❑ B Maintained turf
❑ C ❑ C ❑ C ❑ C ❑ C ❑ C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑ D ❑ D ❑ D ❑ D ❑ D ❑ D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑ B ❑ B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑ B ❑ B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑ C ❑ C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominantvegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory butretaining canopytrees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominantover a large portion of expected strata or communities composed ofplanted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of sing le species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑ No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46to<67 ❑C 67to<79 ❑D 79to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Lane Street Industrial Date of Assessment 8/26/20
Stream Category Pb2 Assessor Name/Organization DWM - Hart & Hickman, PC
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
LOW
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3)StreamsideArea Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
LOW
MEDIUM
(2) StreamsideArea Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2)IndicatorsofStressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Ove ra I I
LOW
LOW

ID#* 20201734
Version* 1
Regional Office * Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 11/11/2020
Contact Name* Matt Bramblett / Dan McCauley
Contact Email Address* [e-mail] /
[e-mail]
Project Name* Lane Street Industrial
Project Owner* Trammell Crow Company
Project County* Cabarrus
Owner Address: Street Address
3700 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 510
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Pegion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
27612
Wake
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes c: No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - r 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
c: Yes C No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
SAW-2020-01712
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below.*

The property developer is proposing the construction of an industrial
development. Stream, wetland and buffer impacts are proposed for a
road crossing, and to facilitate grading on -Site. The planned
development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare
level building pads, roadways, and stormwater BMPs. The owner has
allowed for extensive avoidance and minimization of impacts to
Waters of the US.
Dan McCauley with Hart & Hickman spoke to Alan Johnson on
November 2, 2020 to discuss the preliminary development plan.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
11 /16/2020
11 /17/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Lane Street SP9-TCC 750.pdf 1.43MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Oar "A*
Submittal Date 11/11/2020