20201334 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210127

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
".2
January 27, 2020
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attm Mr. Lyle Phillips
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Tessie Property
Request for NWP 39 & GC 4139
Sage Project #2020.053
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
On behalf of Tessie Properties, LLC (owner & applicant), please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that
the activities associated with the proposed development of the Tessie Property (Project) may proceed under
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 and General Certification 4139 (GC 4139). Proposed impacts to riparian buffers
are "Deemed Allowable" per the Table of Uses.
Protect Purpose and Location
The Site is comprised of two adjacent parcels in an industrial/commercial development. The Site is mostly
developed with a thin strip of wooded area between the two parcels. The western parcel contains a large
commercial building, paved parking spaces and lot, and two driveway access points to Investment Boulevard.
The eastern parcel contains a smaller commercial building, a gravel lot, and an existing stormwater BMP located
in the southwest corner of the parcel. Access to the eastern parcel is provided by a driveway to Schieffelin Road.
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a driveway connection between the two existing, adjacent
parcels. The +/-5.92-acre project is located at 2527 Schieffelin Road and 1096 Investment Boulevard, in the
Town of Apex, Wake County, Raleigh, NC. The coordinates of 35.7249°N, 78.8309°W generally correspond to
the center of the Site.
Project Detail
The overall project consists of the construction of a driveway connection between two existing, adjacent parcels.
The driveway will provide direct access for the property owner to the adjacent parcel without having to utilize the
major thoroughfare of Center Street near the interchange with US 1. Proposed improvements to the eastern
parcel include a building addition, additional parking spaces, and paving of the existing gravel lot. No new utilities
are proposed. Heavy equipment typically used for culvert installation projects, paving, and grading (e.g.
backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur within 1 mile of the Project according to the
NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Database (see attached report dated August 6, 2020).
No historic properties are located on or adjacent to the Site. One "Surveyed Only" property (Whoops Community,
WA2249) and one "Study List Property" (John H. Seagroves House, WA0676) are within 0.5-mile of the Site
based on a query of the GIS files from NCSHPO.
Tessie Property Page 1 of 2

Project History
Mr. Sean Clark of Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage) performed a wetland and stream delineation on August
5, 2020. The wetland data forms and a wetland and stream sketch map are attached as part of this submittal. A
buffer determination site meeting was held with NCDWR staff on September 9, 2020 (RRO #20-275).
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed buildings and roads were aligned so as to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and riparian
buffers to the maximum extent practicable. No wetland impacts are proposed. The crossing location of Stream A
was redesigned to reduce riparian buffer impacts. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction
corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts, while silt fencing will be installed to provide additional
protection from runoff.
Protect Impacts
Proposed permanent stream impacts total 80 linear feet (LF) for a culvert. Permanent riparian buffer impacts
total 3,136 sf (0.07 ac.) in Zone 1 and 0 sf in Zone 2 for the driveway crossing. No other impacts are proposed.
Mitigation
Permanent stream impacts are less than 150 LF and no wetland impacts are proposed. Therefore, mitigation for
proposed wetland and stream impacts is not proposed. Buffer impacts are "Deemed Allowable" per the Table of
Uses.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1-USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2-Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3-PJD Wetland Sketch Map
Figure 4-NCSHPO Map
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter (RRO #20-275)
NCNHP Database Report
Impact Maps (3 sheets)
Wetland Data Forms
Site Photos
ORM Waters Upload Sheet
Tessie Property Page 2 of 2

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201334
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Central Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Tessie Property
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1 /27/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Middle Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.7249-78.8309
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201334
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
9/29/2020
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Rick Trone:eads\rvtrone
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
53.18KB
A. Processing Information C^U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake

Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
V Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Tessie Properties, LLC & Double Yellow Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 17873 DP: 362 & DB: 14039 DP:1416
2c. Responsible party:
Andy Clark
2d.Address
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
PO Box 791
Address Line 2
City
State / Rovince / Ifgion
Apex
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27502
USA
2e. Telephone Number:
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Hamlin
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
city
Slate / Province / Fa?gion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27606
USA
4d. Telephone Number:
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
signed AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM for Tessie Property.pdf
30.34KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Apex
2 Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
0751-08-3695 & 0751-08-0872
5.92
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2527 Schieffelin Road & 1096 Investment Boulevard
Address tine 2
City
State / Province / Region
Apex
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27502
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Middle Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010901
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Site is comprised of two adjacent parcels in an industrial/commercial development. The Site is mostly developed with a thin strip of wooded area between the two parcels. The
western parcel contains a large building, paved parking spaces and lot, and two driveway access points to Investment Boulevard. The eastern parcel contains a smaller building, a
gravel lot, and an existing stormwater BMP located in the southwest corner of the parcel. Access to the eastern parcel is provided by a driveway to Schieffelin Road. Land use in the
vicinity includes industrial properties, commercial properties, and urban residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figurel - USGS.pdf
1.36 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure2 - Soils.pdf 1.29MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.027
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
242
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a driveway connection between the two epsting, adjacent commercial parcels.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project consists of the construction of a driveway connection between two epsting, adjacent parcels. The driveway will provide direct access for the property owner to the
adjacent parcel without having to utilize the major thoroughfare of Center Street near the interchange with US 1. Proposed improvements to the eastern parcel include a building
addition, additional parking spaces, and paving of the epsting gravel lot. No new utilities are proposed. Heavy equipment typically used for culvert installation projects, paving, and
grading (e.g. backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
Wetland data forms and a PJD sketch map are attached.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Mr. Sean Clark
Agency/Consultant Company: Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Other: Supplemental information attached under miscellaneous
attachments
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes f• No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):

F Wetlands W Streams -tributaries [7 Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
Driveway Crossing Permanent Culvert Stream A Intermittent Corps
4 80
fl
Y 9 p gverage (fee) (li �r feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
80
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
80
3j. Comments:
Total permanent stream impacts due to fill from a culvert = 80 LF.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
ae kallthatapply.
17 Neuse
F Catawba
F Goose Creek
F Other
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
F Tar -Pamlico
F Randleman
F Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Site 1 - Deemed Allowable P Stream A No 3,136 0
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00
0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 3,136.00
0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 3,136.00 0.00
61. Comments:
Total Zone 1 riparian buffer impact = 3,136 SF (0.07 ac.) The driveway is a perpendicular crossing that impacts less than 0.1 acre of riparian buffer
and is "Deemed Allowabler" per the Table of Uses.
Supporting Documentation
Tessie_Property_lmpactMaps.pdf 4.31 MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed driveway was designed to be as perpendicular to the stream as practicable to minimized stream and riparian buffer impacts. The
proposed driveway avoids wetland impacts. Construction fencing Will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional
impacts, while silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from runoff.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt
fencing will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

O Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The proposed stream impact is less than 150 LF and the proposed riparian buffer impacts are "Deemed Allowable" per the Table of Uses.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
9 Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
Tessie_Property_lmpactMaps.pdf 4.31 MB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The proposed project is on existing developed parcels that do not require the construction of additional utilities.
G. Supplementary Information u
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Utilities are already available in the area. The development of this property will neither increase nor decrease the likelihood of future development in
this area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The proposed project will utilize existing wastewater services on the Site
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*

r Yes r No f Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-87
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Database (2020) was queried and a report (dated August 6, 2020) was received from NCNHP which identified no recorded
federally listed species on the project site or within a 1-mile radius.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Report for Tessie Property.pdf 1009.68KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
(https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resou rce/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper)
The proposed project takes place in Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster
reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
(NC HPOWEB 2.0) No historic properties are located on or adjacent to the Site. One Surveyed Only property (Whoops Community, WA2249) and one
Study List Property (John H. Seagroves House, WA0676) are within 0.5-mile of the Site.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Figure4 - NCSHPO.pdf 342.23KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center NC Flood Risk Information System DFIRM Panel 3720075100J; Effective 5/2/2006
Miscellaneous 61
Comments
The ORM Waters Upload Sheet Will be sent via e-mail since ePCN does not support excel file attachments.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Tessie Property Supplemental Information - Sketch Map - Data Forms - Photos.pdf 6.64MB
Tessie Property PCN Cover Letter.pdf 98.44KB
Signature
P By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Philip Beach

Signature
Date
1 /27/2021

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: LLL-
Address: �(7OX �1
�x .
Phone: T) -11 -'3"-,
Email: CLl G,fk � e ,3 cJ C Moi i � . C LYY1
Project Name/Description:
Sage Project # 2020.053
Date: O�%6) L
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Wilmington District
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter th property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting h site.to,
r4x X14L1___1
BY: ' L BY:
Print Name of Landowner or Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative Legal Representative

rTn►—
i�
.
H-
P
,�,
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST.-* 1-1-

i
MfC
�{
H r
r ,
}
Feature B
r r, r) #
HrEQ
M f G 2 �s y.
Feature A
r
n f- nB .
C.n rr iN
�i H r� -
Project Study Area
Map Location NRCS Soils Map Figure 2
GRANVILLE Tessie Property
ORANGE DURHAM, FRANKLIN Sage Project # 2020.053
N
SAGE
NASH Wake County, NC Soil Survey 1970 EC LOGICAL
Soil Sheet # 66 SERVICES
WAKE EST. 2016
CHATHAM . Map Prepared by: Philip Beach
WILSON July 28, 2020
JOHNSTON Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
0 200 400 Office:919-335-6757
LEE Feet Cell: 919-559-1537
HARNETT WAYNE

"r
V `�
Firm fkl. rr Rd i
�4X'
C
Ile
Manar'x75
x'.S kerl ln4lon PI
s
fI'0'JN AV
} FdJVV
+ci
gnp yeno'Y'a PI
,fi
qV. -
�9%
dr
t
Dom'
nl in
St Yal yn Pl
qh
sV 5l Jt5y9" In91.n O4 PI
*
lY [
QVV
L
J. n Cr
be,.. Or
4
CIA.
'4�Pno Dr
Whoops
g+
Community,,...-.-.,,,,
L:I
8r
$
=�r OSL GrGya Or
John H.
-
at wnOld ar�,.e I_II
�,I "�•
-
Seagroves
°`
UJ a
House
[:I.Illruli
� tub{ Ifv L
Pall.
-i4jyS+BfJSI,�
U
4
1!
�
;
Z
]SAS COI II C*raa ,ir" J
V
I
}� 6
Inveeimt,ir BIy�
�vt �
¢
U4 v ra Llr
,leaky
, �z
W
�
"i2{r rl
LIrVn Yoyr Ls
rt
�
__
�L
3
F-91 N
JarOeS tl
p
�
,
,P
1�0
p.
'i
3
�
a
f�y[N
4a
11 nItlV Ln
8
419� 1(a
`.9 a
1
A
ri
�
I
�
I Q
a
a
c
a
I v Kd
QProject Study Area
Q 0.5-Mile Project Buffer
0
NCSHPO Status
❑ Study List and Landmark
Surveyed Only
t
19CIPA W101WMLeI1'
Granville
Durham Franklin
Chatham
Wake
Johnston
Lee
NC State Historic
Preservation Office Map
Tessie Property
Sage Project # 2020.053 N
August 6, 2020
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 4
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office:919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

LJ
II � ►W
II i�
I I ► coN
I EX. STORM I i �O
I I DRAINAGE ► O
I (TYPICAL) I c�
Ex. 3o B-B -�--_�
II I I DRIVEWAY
STREAM /. I
ORIGIN I `
POINT ,I
I ► .�
EXISTING I I
CONCRETE I I
YARD AREA I EXISTING
MANHOLE CO,,
vj— --- —
NOW OR FORMERLY
DOUBLE YELLOW
PROPERTIES, LLC
PIN: 075 1-08-0872
ZONING: LI-CU
USE: INDUSTRIAL
EXISTING
'AVSMENT
EXISTING 8".
SAN. SEWER
EX. CREEK _ �It '`' I
C
EXISTING / J I
MANHOLE
/ I
If
/
/
/ r
I I
O' NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER
NOW OR FORMERLY
30' ZONE I NEUSE TESSIE PROPERTIES, LLC
I I RIVER BUFFER PIN: 075 1-08-5808
ZONING: LI /
USE: INDUSTRIAL
I I EX. STORM
DRAINAGE
(TYPICAL)
/ EXISTING /
EXISTING ASPHALT
•''� l / BUILDING
4" PVC ROOF
DRAIN PIPE
1 / /
t F,
G /
1 /
3 °53,
IMPACT AREA
= IMPACT AREA NOTES: _ ' �8
l ® 1. ALL IMPACT AREA IS WITHIN ZONE 1.
,I' x 2. ALL ZONE 2 AREAS ARE WITHIN THE EXISTING _ _ _
i PAVED OR GRAVEL EQUIPMENT YARDS. _ , _ NOTES:
' NEW 9'X 1 8' ` \ 1 . ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF APEX
\ PARKING STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
f° ® SPACE / 2. BOUNDARY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION FOR THE TESSIE PROPERTIES, LLC SITE WAS
TAKEN FROM SURVEYS PROVIDED BY SMITH AND SMITH SURVEYORS.
J' 3. BOUNDARY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION FOR THE DOUBLE YELLOW PROPERTIES, INC. SITE
_ WAS TAKEN FROM WAKE COUNTY G15 INFORMATION.
-IN\ / J f 4. NO FEMA MAPPED FLOODPLAIN EXISTS ON TH15 PROPERTY PER FEMA MAP #3720075 1 OOJ DATED MAY
j l 5. THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE SECONDARY WATERSHED PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT.
I I EXISTING ! �� ,• 1 / tilC r - - G. THE 5JIf HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SAGE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC.
_ _ - AND THE DELINEATED STREAM BUFFER AND WETLANDS HAVE BEEN SHOWN HEREON.
I ASPHALT l 1'" F,... _ _ - - _ 7. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DETAIL INFORMATION.
PARKING AREA ,' 8. THE NEW PARKING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO RECEIVING C.O FOR THE NEW BUILDING ADDITION.
588047'08"E
4 I ' 9. THE NEW DRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT PER AGREEMENT BETWEEN
/ TESSIE PROPERTIES, LLC AND DOUBLE YELLOW PROPERTIES, LLC.
\ ff ,• / \ 10, TRASH AND RECYCLING IS BY ROLL -OUT CARTS.
EXISTING
IGRAVEL // 8 ._..._....., // /
1 YARD TO BE PICNIC TABLE /
PAVED ...... AND BENCH
a A /N � �
I
/ (U
co
it
co `r, I - NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
>N EX151TNG
I BUILDING
500 S
( 0 ) -ZONE I IMPACT AREA
r�
J' // 0 0
I...
1
,
v
FRQPOSEDI'_ /
EXISTING I /
�'' .
I..� CQ:NCRrTl�, s ,
WET POND /
NOW OR
EX. I O' PRIVATE I , v 1 7 • .. - • / FORMERLY
MAINTENANCE .. 4,... t �.4 / OQ E551E PROPERT ES, LLC
T I
1 EASEMENT _ / PIN: 075 1-08-5680
ZONING: LI
USE: INDUSTRIAL
I I
EXIST.a ' /
RISER
40, s :. LQ
I
EXISTING /1/720
15" FES 23 /% ,1I ,
NOW OR FORMERLY
HMM INVESTMENTS I, LLC
PIN: 075 1-08-2254
ZONING: LI
USE: INDUSTRIAL
EXIST. RCA
ADJUSTED
(0.29 AC)
Q0
PROPOSED BUILDING
-� ADDITION
40 J z
N (2,414 SF)
2 5 ;7,
EXISTING
CHAIN LINE
FENCE
NOW OR FORMERLY
HMM INVESTMENTS I, LLC
PIN: 075 1-08-6205
ZONING: LI
USE: INDUSTRIAL
EX. STORM
DRAINAGE
(TYP I CAL)
0 10 20 40
GRAPHIC SCALE
i
U
J
!�
J
CL
U
z
.�
ob
W
W
O
�
z
c
rn
®
Z
C
O
-i
W
.�L.1
N
111
U
IV U
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jone=omn.com
. r�Gayv0 i3➢➢➢➢➢ -
C
0��A
j.
Q
J
OO
U
Z =
L O
z
O
w
0
J
z Q
Q
V J n�n
L
W U
n
I..r._ L
V J 5
L
0
R
L
W
s
X
,^ w
U Jl
Q
11J w
O
z
O
H
1 "= 20' 1 WCN
JANUARY 4, 2021
3
204G

1
1`
1
1I
1
AREA
30 ZONE I
NEUSE
RIVER BUFFER IMPACT
(3,13G 5F)
CHANNEL IMPACT
(80 LF)
FX15TING
RETAINING
WALL

JONES &
CNOSSEN
Adi�ENGINEERING, PLLC
Subject
Job No. I�p Sh. Of�
Project1
By Z— Date
.l L
R
SPh
4." r
0
e
s i
e
A u
e
., .
,
v b -
{
LIZ
t
E
E
E :
.. ��.
r
:

;4
Ei!� P
t
Wtialtland WOUS
and WA
02Now
7 ac.
nd
QProject Study Area
Potential Non -Wetland WOUS - Intermittent Stream
' -0/'7 Potential Wetland WOUS
2' Contours
19ClPIN Welw�14Lei 1
Granville
Durham Franklin
Chatham
Wake
Johnston
Lee
'# �r
4
DP2
Aul
PJD Sketch Map
Tessie Property
Sage Project # 2020.053 N
August 6, 2020
0 200 400
Feet
Figure 3
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office:919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Tessie Property City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 08/05/2020
Applicant/Owner: Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 - Wet
Investigator(s): S. Clark Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.7243°N Long: 78.8306°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wy - Worsham sandy loam NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Per Antecedent Precipitation Tool, climatic conditions were wetter than normal on the sampling date. Wetland is in a maintained sewerline easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1 - Wet
r,Dsoiuie uominam
inuicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 30 (A) 40 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Murdannia keisak
15 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Persicaria sagittata
5 Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Boehmeria cylindrica 5 Yes FACW
4. Juncus effusus
5 Yes
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 - Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy loam
2-12 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Tessie Property City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 08/05/2020
Applicant/Owner: Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): S. Clark Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.7246°N Long: 78.8306°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wy - Worsham sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Per Antecedent Precipitation Tool, climatic conditions were wetter than normal on the sampling date. Wetland is in a maintained sewerline easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
50
Yes
FACU
2. Quercus phellos
10
No
FAC
3. Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
70
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Cornus florida
5
Yes
FACU
3.
Elaeagnus umbellata
5
Yes
UPL
4.
Prunus serotina
2
No
FACU
5.
Juniperus virginiana
2
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
24
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
12
20% of total cover:
5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Microstegium vimineum
50
Yes
FAC
2.
Festuca
20
Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
70
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Hedera helix
15
Yes
FACU
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
FACU species 74 x 4 = 296
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 169 (A) 591 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.50
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey sandy clay
3-12 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey clay
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

P 5 - 3%
+
� u
n

Fri
f
41
VI
/v
+o
40
y�

3Y
17
ti v'
d s x
i

MMMEM Roy Cooper, Governor
So • NC DEPARTMENT OF
■UMM NATURAL AND CULTURAL PESOUPCES Susi Hamilton„ Secretary
M MMM Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12615
August 6, 2020
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Tessie Property; 2020.053
Dear Sean Clark:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httl2s://www.fws.aov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerCo)ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Tessie Property
Project No. 2020.053
August 6, 2020
NCNHDE-12615
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Na MMCommon Nam Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Owner Type
Town of Apex Open Space - Seagrove Farm
Town of Apex
Local Government
Neighborhood Park
Town of Apex Open Space
Town of Apex
Local Government
Town of Apex Open Space - Clairmont Park
Town of Apex
Local Government
Town of Apex Open Space - Sue Helton Park
Town of Apex
Local Government
Town of Apex Open Space
Town of Apex
Local Government
Town of Apex Open Space
Town of Apex
Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
Town of Apex Open Space
Town of Apex
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on August 6, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. PI
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-12615: Tessie Property
y
g
9 gate Ct
0
New (lover Rd FO
v
_
1
_
-
Apex
�B S
,...
_ ? �-n41 In
i 6 S,� Hnartier�
a
'.
C
a
JParkfi+off nor
<
fJ�+chingham Way
-
W
Crrfver Ce
f Sr .'rtej Sf 503 «
Rainesv iew Lo _
Up
eSl
F`
hdlia �
'' hiyrffe
C1r
�
vwrrh SJ N�
P
'
o Sr
Gr
°"U
G pc,
K'dle,fand
tyy,
�otta9ep
✓�+J1
nT Clr
ei
'IJar
O
Re9et T
rr4>
S+
..
- c
,e •v! ne
R�
+ cn Or
edC
2Aby r
C
`3�a.,
r
v .. •. ran 4Pvn
�sh
`a
Aaa St
~
/
�
.e`aUa�.£•PoPy
Md.::
i
Ca;M
-
Nc
4r
✓
� E -
'=Veda��
Eslate Or � � ,�
J v`'c`iJ
- ._
F
-� � O
a
-
'
487R
t Clue— Rd
O
-
3'y 1
m
yTr.
a
F
Knggs I..y
etc 0
Q
GolfhrCenral
_
W�E
S
�
August 6, 2020
M Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:21,760
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp_, GEBCC_, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community

ID#* 20201334
Version* 1
Regional Office * Central Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Rick Trone
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 9/29/2020
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Name*
Project Owner*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Kim Hamlin
[e-mail]
Tessie Property
Jones & Cnossen, PE
Wake
Street Address
PO Box 1062
Address Line 2
aty
Apex
Postal / Zip axle
27502
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
* 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
* Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes C No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
RRO #20-275
State / Province / Pegion
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below.*
The Site is comprised of two adjacent parcels located at 2527 Schieffelin
Road and 1096 Investment Boulevard in Apex, NC. The proposed project
involves a driveway connecting both commercial properties.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
10/14/2020
10/15/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
NCDWR RRO #20-275 - Tessie Property -
3.42MB
Wake.pdf
Figurel - USGS.pdf 1.36MB
Figure2 - Soils.pdf 1.29MB
Figure3_Sketch.pdf 845.87KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 9/29/2020