310828_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210121

Facility'Nainber
.(YDivision of Water Resources ;
31 = $a$ 0 Division of Soil -and Water Conservation .
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 7Routine
pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1 pry Departure Time: °v County: R,p_ 1A
Farm Name: Pt uASFlzy , S 1�E 'f$a CS`�') Owner Email:
Owner Name: P-at4ALD �T' GCr ��''Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Region:w 1 Aa
Certified Operator: fi,,xk 8rowr, Certification Number: I do lS1 oZ
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design- Current
`=Swine, `Capacity Pop:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
3 5 5 a
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
a
Design, , Current ° ;. Design Curr jif '
W' Toultr Capacity Pop.' ` Cattle . Capacity' . Pop
JLayer
Non -Layer
Design,' Current
Dry Pnnitry Canacitb Pnn.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[—]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑Yes
[] o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes��N_o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes5-'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
i
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: �5- 2 22 jDate of inspection: I
ado
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑I o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):i R 5
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[/] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ITo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): P641 SGd i M-1)t &tl
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes , E!(No
❑ Yes [fNo
❑ Yes ["No
❑ Yes DNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes j�/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 - 3at jDate of Inspection: I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pei 't? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
❑ Yes EJ/No
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes [ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other -comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Co,K,6;�edl „�, '31—aa `� r Ike -( cC I i 'y i s
19 �^
QOG �co� L,-) J �a S �e n w �� ti evl CsjM b,�+i w� s i �n'� aTl?J,. cirri 9 , o
�6H. ��c'�I�{-;eS, �w l spy►. C����4,� JS GSIa r)e.Lk�ee-
pPj ► 1 As�- uJnle car. Ei►hw.er%tiv„ev*i- fa, lot) 16
&15C0 .. I o =aV P= 49
t-L�dow a ® --31 ? = 53
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1""14 PC A"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: (°! 1 o.) 614' 9 547
Date: I ) / � 6 a
21411015