20200941 Ver 2_9_ACC_PJD_Package_FINAL_5112018-compressed_20210120

Thompson
Environments
Consulting
Thompson Environmental Consulting
P.O. Box 541
Midland, NC 28107
[phone]
May 11, 2018
ATTN: David Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Subject: Albemarle Corporate Center Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Concurrence Request,
Albemarle, NC
Mr. Shaeffer:
Thompson Environmental Consulting (Thompson Environmental) was retained by Chambers Engineering to
complete the jurisdictional waters delineations within the study area defined by parcel number 654702867363 in
Stanly County, NC.
The site investigation was conducted between February 22 and 23, 2018, to identify any potential jurisdictional
features within the study area. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Field Verification Meeting with the
United Stated Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was held on May 4, 2018. During this agency site visit, forty-
eight potential jurisdictional features were verified (6 ponds, 14 streams, and 28 wetlands). Changes made during
the meeting include: 1) A 167' reach of Stream SA was designated as intermittent, 2) wetlands WT and WS were
combined on the right descending bank of Stream SA, and 3) the upper 250' of Stream SF was designated as
intermittent. This revised PJD Package reflects these changes.
Additionally, per your request, the age of each pond on the site was investigated to determine estimated construction
dates for each. Based on a review of historic orthoimagery and topographic mapping, in addition to personal
communication with an adjacent landowner, it was determined that the construction dates of all ponds except Ponds
PA and PD were prior to 1970. Based on orthoimagery, Pond PA was built between 2006 and 2008; however, we
could not determine the status of any permitting related to this feature. Additionally, we were unable to assess the
age of Pond PD since it was not visible on most/all of the imagery that was reviewed.
This is a request for concurrence with our assessment. If you have any questions or require additional information,
please contact me at the number above or by email: [e-mail]. I appreciate your assistance on this
project.
Sincerely,
Larry Thompson, NCEHS, PWS, LSS
Thompson Environmental Consulting
P.O. Box 541
Midland, NC 28107
Cc: Alan Johnson, NCDWR
Thompson Environmental Consulting1thompsonenv.com

Albemarle Corporate Center
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
Stanly County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Chambers Engineering
Prepared by:
Thompson
Environments
Consulting
P.O. Box 541
Midland, NC 28107
May 2018

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Thompson Environmental Consulting (Thompson Environmental) was retained by Chambers
Engineering to complete jurisdictional waters delineations within the study area defined by
parcel number 654702867363 in Albemarle, NC (Stanly County). The study area is
approximately 283 acres and is comprised of agricultural fields and wooded bottomlands. The
purpose of this site investigation was to identify, and map potential jurisdictional waters located
within the study area (Figure 1).
2.0 RESULTS
The site investigation was conducted between February 22 and 23, 2018. A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Field Verification Meeting with the United Stated Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) was held on May 4, 2018. During this agency site visit, forty-eight potential
jurisdictional features were verified (6 ponds, 14 streams, and 28 wetlands; Tables 1-4; Figure 3).
Wetland boundaries were flagged with pink and black striped flagging, streams with blue
flagging, and ponds were noted on aerials.
Table 1. Potential streams in the study area.
Stream Name
Map ID
NCDWR Index
Number
Best Usage
Classification
Poplin Branch
Poplin Branch
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SA
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SB
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SC
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SD
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SE
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SF
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SG
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SI
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SJ
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SK
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SL
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SM
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
UT to Poplin
Branch
SN
13-17-31-1-3-1
C
Table 2. Characteristics of potential streams in the study area
Appears on
Map ID
Length (ft.)
Classification
River Basin
NRCS Soil
Buffer
Survey?
Poplin Branch
918
Perennial
Not Subject
Yes
SA -I
167
Intermittent
Not Subject
Yes
SA-P
4,509
Perennial
Not Subject
Yes
SB
145
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
SC
33
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
Albemarle Corporate Center May 2018
PJD Package Page I

Table 2. Characteristics of potential streams in the study area (continued)
Map ID
Length (ft.)
Classification
River Basin
Buffer
Appears on
NRCS Soil
Survey?
SD
453
Intermittent
Not Subject
Yes
SE
1,409
Perennial
Not Subject
Yes
SF -I
250
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
SF-P
321
Perennial
Not Subject
No
SG
619
Perennial
Not Subject
Yes
SI
71
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
SJ
51
Perennial
Not Subject
No
SK
73
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
SL-I
988
Intermittent
Not Subject
Yes
SL-P
467
Perennial
Not Subject
Yes
SM
23
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
SN-I
153
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
SN-P
164
Perennial
I Not Subject
I No
Total
10,814
I — Intermittent
P — Perennial
Note: Stream SH was identified but was located outside of the study area.
Table 3. Surface waters in the study area
Surface Water
Jurisdictional
Map of ID Connection
Acreage
PA
Yes
WC/SA
0.05
PB
Yes
SK/SA
0.23
PC
Yes
WV/SA
0.12
PD
Yes
WY/Po hn Branch
0.04
PE
Yes
Poplin Branch
0.70
PF
Yes
Poplin Branch
0.58
Total
1.72
Table 4. Potential wetlands in the study area
Map ID
NCWAM Wetland Type
Hydrologic
Classification
Acreage
WA
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.21
WB
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.01
WC
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.54
WD
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.06
WE
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.01
WF
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.06
WG
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.05
WH
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
I Riparian
0.12
WI
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
I Riparian
0.02
Albemarle Corporate Center May 2018
PJD Package Page 2

Table 4. Potential wetlands in the study area (continued)
Map ID
NCWAM Wetland Type
Hydrologic
Classification
Acreage
WJ
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.23
WK
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.01
WL
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.09
WM
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.07
WN
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
< 0.01
WO
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.01
WI)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.05
WQ
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.08
WR
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.01
WS
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.30
WU
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.06
WV
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.05
WW
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.03
WX
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
< 0.01
WY
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
0.12
WZ
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
< 0.01
WAA
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.16
WAB
Headwater Forest
Riparian
0.09
WAC
Seep
Non -riparian
0.03
Wetland WT was removed during the agency site visit.
Total
2.48
Albemarle Corporate Center May 2018
PJD Package Page 3

Appendix A
Figures

N
u. 1 Y
O
Al O Z ON RS( Z
v r
U 'P 11400 00 CO
,.
O G Z
co `-- O RI Q
© OpenStreetWp (and) Z ter -
contributors, CC -BY -SA
O� Q
.. 0
Q OG
HASTtNGS w �r
O O��SN�RE
0
+fir. - .�A} Y !.! � .�^ •. _-'; ;yi. � � .: �� ;
Roads Ov�NS\O�
Q ACC Study Area
Y
County Boundary u� { " STONGAP
n -rfor �'eo•r phi Inf• i GI r
Prepared For:
Thompson
Environments Chambers
Consulting
Engineering
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination:
Albemarle Corporate Center
Vicinity Map
Stanly County, North Carolina
Date:
March 2018
Scale: 0 400 800 Feet
I i I
Job No.:
18-607
Drawn By:
Checked By:
NS
NH
Figure

i Aid
AM
i
ACC Study Area
Prepared For:
Thompson � Chambers
f nva'?nmenta
Consulting Engineering
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination:
Albemarle Corporate Center
USGS 7.5 Minute
Topographic Quadrangle Map
Stanly County, North Carolina
Date:
March 2018
Scale: 0 200 400 Feet
L---L—JI
Job No.:
18-607
Drawn By:
Checked By:
NS
NH
Figure
2

Prepared For:
Thompson
fnvironmenta Chambers
Consulting Engineering
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination:
Albemarle Corporate Center
Jurisdictional Features Map
Stanly County, North Carolina
Date:
May 2018
Scale:O
i
200 400 Feet
� i
Job No.:
18-607
Drawn By:
Checked By:
NS
NH
Figure

Appendix B
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Data Forms

NC DW 5tlream identification Forth Version 4.11
❑ate; CJ.' , Projectl5lte; �� Latitude: 35. �3; IS9 _
Evaluator: r DGJ County: Longitude
Total Points; Stream Determinat�o circle one) Other
J] rr 1
Stream is of least intermittent r r Y1 f i1rf
!t 19 orperepnial it z 30` �• 2 � `! 17-� Ephemeral in6ermitten Perennial e.g Quad Na err
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = r •':7
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg —_-0
��
12_._w__
3
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
7
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
p
q
2
3
5. Active/relict floodpiain
0
1
2
3
5, Depositional bars or beaches
o
=1
2
3
T Recent aiiuvial deposits
0
1
2
_
3
8- hieadcuts
/'0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N9, - 0
Yes = 3
arunciat awnes are not rated; see doussions inanUal
B. Hydrology (Su btotai = — r _ j
12, Presence of Basefiow
0
1
2
3
13- Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14, Leaf litter
1.5
1
0-5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1 5
16- Organic debris lines or piles
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes1,`
L.. ril(I -WIV 1111rTTOTAI = ?--/ _ ] )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
p
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2p, Macrobenthos {Hate diversity and abundance)
r�p
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks _ —
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
i
1.5_
_23 Crayfish _
0-5
1 --
1.5
24. Amphibians
1.5
0.5
1
25- Algae_ _ _-
�....
4
Y _
1.5
_
1
2E Wetland plants in streambed
_
FACW = 0-752 dBL = 1.5 Other = o
perennial strea7s may o be identified using other methods_ See p. 35 of manual.
_
Notes;
_
---- -� - �� — ---
Sketch:P� ]
_---.-_
Bank Height (ft}: 9,5 -
f�--�—'
Bankfull width (ft}:,7-
Wate1 depth (in): � -
Channel sub s ilt, Sand ravel, Cobble,
Bedrock �y
Velocity Fast, dow Nose.
• moderate,
Clarity -Clear ightlyturbid, turbid rr

-5t�
NC DW>Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
❑ate: t
P rojectiS ite: �J
Latitude: -3 S 33 Ll 7 05-
Evaluator: 1040f, 140W(A
County; {
_._.�..
Stream Determination (circle
Longitude:-go1-7 1
1
other AI &P-M°t r £
Tatal Points: �
Stream is at least frarerrnfttent
Stream
if Z 99 or perennial I le 3D` ,�
Ephemeral tntermittent .�et'enniai
e.g Quad Name: �Q j to
A. Geomorphology subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
❑
0
d _
2
3
_
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- col se uence
0
t
� �
�.�
3
4- Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3.
6, Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
- 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
p-5
1
1.5
1D, Natural valley
0
0.5
1
"T:S
11- Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes -
artlficlaI ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1�_ ] _
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
j
2
�3�
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1__
2
3
14. Leaf litter
t,
1
0.5
❑
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1 5
15- Organic debris lines or piles
❑
0;
1
1 5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
yes`-_3
C, Biology (Subtotal = ---. P- } —
18- Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
❑
19_ Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
.3 _
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
_
2
3
22. Fish
05
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
0
❑
05
�' 0.5 ]
t
1 _
1-5
1 5 -�
24 Amphibians --W -
25. Algae
0 5
1
_ 1-5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FAC =O 75; 0E3L = 1 5 other-�0
`perennial strea-s fray also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
r of ram `ems d
Ka '.n Av
Sketch p t •
Bank Height (R):
�` Id
uA ok
Ban kfuII width (rt): r
r
Water depth (inl. 3 /d f
_
59
Channel suhstrate Clay. Silt, Sand, Gravel. Lobble,
�
Bedrock
Velocity - fast,moderate, slaw
`
Clarity r slightly turbid, turbid

NC DWQ Strum Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 0 212Z r2 d ` g
Project/Site: �� �.
Latitude: � 5, 3-3-327 (o
Evaluator: } [6WQ ` I4a� SC�
County; 5+C—i,t�
Longitude:_ 0,f��j,���
Other AI be-nno r f�
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
stream is at ennileasl ifarr,0' �} �
ifz �9 ar erenrrralrfz 30` T
Epheme . nterr� en Perennial
a-g Qvad Narrre: 2 ! j
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal =
Absent.
Weak
Moderate
Strong-
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
7
;Q
_ 2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
��
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
b
1
2
3
5. Acbvelrelict floociptain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7- Recent alluvial deposits
0
t
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
:4 j]
Z
3
9. Grade control
0
b.5
1
1,5
10_ Natural valley
0
0-5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
artlficiai dit hes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4_ ____ ) _
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
Cl?
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
C 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
5
1
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high watertable7
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology Subtotal - . =1 C ____
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
' z
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0-5
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
6.5 �)
1
1.5.
24. Amphibians _ -
0
0 5
_...�_._.t
1.5
25. Algae � _'
--- 0- -
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
_
FACW - 0 75; BL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial rears may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
_
Notes: of � ;f� � � � ,' . '
:a- ,:rj rr�r 4; 1-5
-h
1 Bank Height {ftl:-
Sketch:
A. Bankfull width [ft): r�
Watef depth (in); Q -
Channel substrate- Clay, Silt, Sand, eve
Cotr4le,
Bedrock
veloci'ry, - fast, moderate, slow %�p r w
Clarity ale slightly turbid, turhid

.01
'SL
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date; 0-2/7 2'Z0 { � S
Evaluator: Nast+� HowL i 't NetkI Gt E(Ott County: S+a r i
Total Points: ------------ _-_ _.`��.
Stream DetermmaUQn circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent ! f �I Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
if a 19 or aerennlal if z 30' �..
Latitude: 3 S. 3 3 3 20 �
Longitude: _ go c� `
Other f C Lima r [-e-
e.g Quad Name: 'Zd j
A. Geomorphology subtotal = 1)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1& Continuity of channel bed and bank
a
1
2
3
2, Sinuosity of Channel along thalweg
0
1121
2
T 3
3- In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
d le- oolsequence
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
i
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1,
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
g. Grade control
0
6-5
1
1,5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 _
1.5
11. Seoond or greater order channel
N.O. r4o
Yes = 3
artlficlal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B- Hvdroloav l5uhtota1 = 4- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow i
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
t
0.5
1
❑
1 5
15. Sedirnent on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0,5
1
1-5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C- Biolornv f5iihtotal = -/
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
❑
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
❑
20 Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance]
0
t
2
3
21_ Aquatic Mollusks
f 0
t
2
3
22_ Fish
D -
0.5
0.5
0 5
1
1
1 y
1.5
1.5
1.5
23 Crayfish
:'0
0
24 Amphibians -- -
25. Algae __-
0
05
1
1.5
25 Wetland plants in streambed
FAGN - ❑ 75;
8L = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial strew rs may also be identified using other methods. See p 35 of manual
_
Notes:
Sketch; F
�^ JJ
JS to l;,I_ `,,r J*i .
Bank Height (ft); j
Ba0toll width (tt): `I
Water depth (in). D- ►� ,�
Channel substrate ay. Silt, Sand, Gravel Cobb
Redroek
Velocity • Fast, moderate, slow Noy% .. f
Clarity ea . slightly turbid, turbid i l.1

1yr
NC DWO Streams Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I 2-2` ZQ ��
ProiecuSite: f
Latitude: 3� 33 �Q2
Evaluator: NOL� V►, i{ w_kl1 Nail
County: jto v tV�-
Longitude: -i Z'.42-
Total Points;
Stream 0eterm tt4 circle one)
other t yvr a'J
Stream Is at feast Intermittent r' !!�g
it? 99 or ererrrrial if z 30. -� _j
EphemeraLrintermittent erennial
e.g Quad Name: �D
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = 3
Absent
Weak
Moderate 1Strong
1a Continuity ofchannel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
L
2
3
4. particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activalrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
S. Headcuts
0
-1
3
9. Grade control
0
r0 5
1
1.5
10, Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0 _
Yes = 3
a arllficlaI ditches are not rated; see dls�pssionsin manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13_ Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
C' '
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
[ -
1
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No - 0
Ye = 3
C. Bioloav !Subtotal = ,, , ]
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2,
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
'
1
2
3
22. Fish
, 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
�0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1.5
25. Algae
05
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Oth = 0
'perennial strea-s may also be identified using other rnethods. Seep 35of manual.
Notes; e ti' / W& 'I I t
r e~r
G
Sketch:
`;
Bank Height (ft). or y
sankfull width [f<l-
Water depth (in): D
Channel substrate lay. Silt, Sand., Grave, bole,
Bedrock ,,r
velocity -fast, moderate, slow JV me,
Clarity ;I -. slightlyturbid, turbid
�rl e

NC DWO Strew Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2' ZZ 201 g
Project/Site: �[, [„ J—�
Latitude: 35, 3S & 3Y c7
Evaluator: No,+ vi Irtowa-I If i��Lj UrVti�
County: �"r�iVl �
Longitude: - $C7• �� ��IoCv
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circ e_o
Ephemeral Intermittent
Ephemeral
Other N b t rna r I
e.g Quad Name:
if a •19 ar Perennial if z 30' j
erennlal
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1$ Gontin.uity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3- In -channel structure; ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
r
4- Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5- Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
,2.-a
3
5. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
S. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
_ 0.5
1
c- ►5-�'
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes : 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav [Subtotal = q, ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13- iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
0-5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
r 0.5
1
1 5
16- Organic debris lines or piles
0
d 5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high vmtertable?
No = 0 `'`
Ye = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = i U ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenth os (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22, Fish
0)
05
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
05
r 1
1-5
25. Algae
0
05
t
1.5
26 Wetland plants in strearbed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial stree -s may also be ldenti d using other methods. See p 35 of manual -
Notes: p1 r 5 6,',!
r,�
�
[�
Sketch: e.� �]���i{i �t r
l
�V Bank Height (ft):
Bankfuil width (ft):�
water depth (in): f ,f— %_
Channel substrat - Cia Slit Sand Gre�el Cebbl
Bedrock
Velocity - fast�m,`Jm-�1. slow
Clarity clearlightly turbid, turbid

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: rl y / ZD
Project[Site: � �
Latitude; 35" _
Evaluator: Or44rick
County ,
Longitude:_ _
Total Points: lea
Stream is at least irr[errnfirenl /% f `] �y
if a 19 or Perennial if Z 36' L- r G' `f' 3
Stream Dete rm i n atiori_(cl role one)
Ephemeral Ijlh mittent erennial
other
a.g Quad Name:
r
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
ng
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
1
1
2 _
2
2
�:3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3, In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step-pool,0t
ri le- ovl sequence
4. Particie size of stream substrate
0
1.
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
' 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
�—
0
CID
2
3
9. Grade control
_ 9)
015
1
1.5 N
�10N;�Imallley
0
0.51
r greater order channel
No _ 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
_B. Hydrology [Subtotal = C }
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Iran oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
L�14Leaf litter1
0.5
0
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1 5
.organic debris lines or piles
0
!0.5
1
1-5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
U. Hioly Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
_
p
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
_
0
20- Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
?l Aquatic Mollusks
1
1
2
2
3
3
22. Fish
�Q
0.5
23 Crayfish
0__
0
0 -
0.5
0.5
1
� -
_ _ _ �._
1.5
1.5 ._-•-
_24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0 5 _ _...
26 Wetland plants in streambed �� --
--
FAC _ . BL = 1.5 Other = 0
__
perennial streem.s may also be identified usi . other methods- See p. 35 of manual
--_
i�1ptE5:.....�i+ + fy�rt1
%ice
Sketch: �_.�_..y--...r.__�....._.__.._—-/�...W
I, �j }}
_. _—__.._.......�_.._._._
•- Bank Height [hy: / I �' - •---__� .._.. __.
Bankfull width (ft):
Water depth (in), 0
Channel substrate'�t, S�ravel, Cobble,
Bedrock
velocity • Fast, moderate, slow t%/4P
Clarity Clear slightivturbA turbid G°Ae311
M

'5-F
NC: DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2 1 27 p j
Projectf5ite: ir l
Latitude:,`-_ 335721
Evaluator: Na�V�av-i Rowe-11 + p J -rwft
County, �� y � � �
Longitude: .'�D. 1'7 2,5 2-
Total Points: , �� C�
rr(/,
Stream Determination (circle one
other Albzro ar- I �
Stream is at feastinterrr7Weat �
Ephemeral Intermitter4t l rennial
e.g QuadNarrre: �p�
ire 1-0or erennia! ff z 3D'
1
A. Geomor holy Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
L�
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
D
7
3
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4, Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5- AeUvelrelict floodpiain
0
i
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
CLQ;
0.5
1
1.5
10. NaturaI valley
0
0,5
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
N = ❑
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = ':�9,-3 )
12. presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13- Iran oxidizing bacteria
0
i
2
3
14- Leaf litter
1
i
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16_ organic debris lines or piles
1 0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable7
I No = 0
Yes - 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic. Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
o
0.5
1
1-5
23: Crayfish
0
0-5
1
1-5
24, Amphibians
0
�0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0
.5
i
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW,, 0.75; BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial ree-rs y also be identified sing other methods- Siee p
35 of manuai-
r`iDt85: dti 1✓ +'r 0 1� .d
r a"allof�7
Sketch: �� � J�L 1 -}� �� ���
Bank Height [ft),
� Bankfull width [ttlrti 441
\, Water depth (in): ' -_
Channel substrate. d`la ' Sand, Gravel Cobble,
Bedrock
Velocity - fast, maderaterrl��
Clari tlea slightly turbid, turbid

s6-
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2' 22-1 ProjectJSite: Latitude: 5S 33Lt o -1-
Evaluator: j� tiingv� i0u,� t+� t �h C� SCd+ County: _+dt 4�} �, Longitude: - g0. j� 3(J 7.�
Total Points: Stream Determination iciTtamn other bP !r►`�ar i
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral intermMent perennial g Quad Name: -2-
if Z 19 or perennial if z 30' I
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
i
3
3. in -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2 -
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5, Active/re lict floodp[ain
0
1'
2
3
5, Depositional bars or benches
0
.1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
�2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
t
P 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R HvrlrnInrev Miihtntal= 4,''5 1
12. Presence of 6aseflow
0
f
L
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 )
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1,5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
r. Rinlmrnr (gPihtMPl = wl ,' a
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
i
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
i
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
D 5
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; ❑BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial strew -�-s may also be identified using other rnethods. See p. 35 of ma ual.
Notes:
r
f
Sl(BtCi!' J v - N ? _ 4J �r] r _•
sank Height N: r''� !
Bankfull width {ftl:3 �FJ e
Water depth iinl: D - / (
Channel suhstrat � I , Silt,.Sand, Gravel; Cobble
Bedrock
velocity - Fast, moderate, slow
Clari nda r,_�ightiy turbid, turbid

e 53`L[ CA r ta G0 kA j a
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project{site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream determination circle one)
other
Stream is of least intermittent r•]
Ephemeral ntermittent erennial
e.g Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30 *
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = l "�
Absent
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
2. Sinuos' of channel along thalweg
0
7WeakjModerate
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex rif "ool, step -pool,
rile- oaf se uence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of strearn substrate
0
1
2,
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
S. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
4
2
3
9, Grade control
0
_ 0-5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0-5
1
1.5
11_ Second or greater order channel
No 10
Yes=3
a arttf[cial ditches are riot rated; see discussions in manual
B- Hvdroloav (Subtotal = -� )
12.. Presence of Baseflow
0
' 2
3
13• Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
;',1,
2
3
14, Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on p€ants or debris
0
05
IS- Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1-5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
No = 0
Yes 3
C.- Bioloav !Subtotal = ?r�1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note dfversfty and abundance)
0
' 1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
j
1
2
3
22, Fish
I1
0-5
1
1,5
23. CrWsh
0
0-5
1
1.5
24_ Amphibians
0.
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
05
1
1,5
25 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI - 1, 5 Other z 0 �I
'perennial st en7s may also be identffied using other methods. See p. 35 of Manual-
Nlates:
Sketch: - »� i ,_ �-� -
-Lr
1
Bank Helght (ft):
BankfuEl width (ftj:
water depth (in);
Channel substrate[ Clay, Silt, Sand, Gravel, Co6hle,
Bedrock
velocity - Fast, maderate slo
Clarity - eirr lightly turbid, turbid

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2 1 2-3) 2-0 1 g
Pro;ectelie: ACC J D
Latitude: 3Se ;3 �, 21 3
Evaluator: Not1,a:-, i'tuwC a>1C� Cto-t
county: S+an
Longitude: - 3o. [-7 i `S' ,33
Total Points: �
Stream aeterminatio "rcleonej
�-
ether � i berms r- If-
Stream is at least intermftfent
r
Ephemeral -intermittent erennial
e,g Quad Name: -2 C) 1 b
ita �9 ar eref+rtialifz 30" _
f r
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = J } J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
12 Continuity of channel bedand bank
0
i
2
�^
2- Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3, ln-channel structure-- ex. riffle -pool, step-paol,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
.0
i
2
3
S. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10
1
1.5
10- Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
N = 0
Yes = 3
anuivar uuw es are run rdenu, bur Gl 5bwna in ricaiiuur
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1
?
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf I itter
1.5
�1� _
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
(' =
i 1,5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
No = 0
Yes. T•3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0 ?
19. Rooted upland punts in streambed
�3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
v0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
¢.
1
2
3
22. Fish
rp
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1-5
24. Arnphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 r
0.5
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACVV = 0-75; CSL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial strea-s may also be identified lasing. other rneihods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:,
Sketch: j apylL�� r ��
Bank Height (ft):
Bankfull width {#tj:�-� IF
Water depth i 4 f 3
Channel substrate • Clayi , ravel ❑bole,
Bedrock
velocity -fast moderate slow
Clarity ear lightly turbid, turbid

.Nf- V W 11 Ntream laentiricatton r arm v ersron 4.1 A
Date: 2/ 2 3 12.0 1 P rojectlsite: A c C. -XD Latitude: 3 .3 3 4❑ -7 �
Evaluator: NcAlan H•o�•c 1 i t Nam j 5[ u-W County, StAn i is Longitude: - gp, 1-71 aOS-
Total Points: Stream Determination (C-LEC Other 14 l be rriGtr i2
Stream fs at leas[ interrnittent ] Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial e.g Quad Name: -2-0 f
if a 19 or erennial if Z 30`
A. Geomorphology Subtotal _
Absent-
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1 l
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7, Recent ailuvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10, Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No-2 0 }
Yes = 3
artificlaI ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R 1- %ArnInnw Mi ihfrifml = .Z %
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
(�Z)
3
13_ Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1 5
15. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
F 1
7.5
17, Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes x3
f Rinlnn%r /Ci ihfn4ml = I.-, •h 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
f 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21_ Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22.. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1-5
25. Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Othe = 0'•
'perennial strea-s may also be identified using other methods See p, 35of manual.
Notes: ,+ �.. �-�. I �,�
'�
lh'.r
��� I _71tr
T�
Sketch: ]{ �� ? �t ..� a j� •
Bank Height (f V
BankfuII width (ft5- �f
Water depth (in): : _,._■_____.`y
Channel substrate -'Clay. Silt. Sand, -,a Cobble,
Bedrock
Velocity - fa t, moderate,1 la
Clarity clear lightly turbid, turbid

NC DWQ Streani Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: z 1 23 f 2D I9
Project/Site:
Latitude: 26. 333"789
Evaluator: No-�navi RojffC 1 t NtanCj -S ( D-ti"
County: S+41i Ut.
Longitude: - 90. 1-7004-7
Total Paints:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determjnatiao circle one)
Ephemeral 4ntum2l
Other W b e. rrlctr %
ip
if z 19 ar erertr+ial tf z 3r?' L
it
erennial
e.g QuadName. j
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Mod rate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
rl le- ool se uence
0
r1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
-
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
_
1
2
3
fi. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 -
0.5
1
1-5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11 Second or greater order channel
Np = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ddches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
w 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
❑
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter L
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5._
1
1.5
15. Organic debris lines or piles
0
. 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water to e?
N 0
Yes = 3
U. uiolo subtotal = i '
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream' d
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and undance )
0
1
2
2
3
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
22. Fish
a;=
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(.0
0.5
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25 Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
25 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 013L = 1.5 Othef =
a p, 35 of anua1.
'pe re n nia I_Weams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes: -se6 72,p4
10f t} �
: r 1"+fl r. - J [7'r
r
r
Sketch: � p tr �-�s7� � ��
IJ /
j� Bank Height (ft}: � r �
II Bankfull width (ft);�
Water depth (in), Q
Channel suhstrat Cla , Silt, Sand, Grave obble, Bedrock
Veioclty -fast moderate, slow d r
Clarity ear lightly turbid, turbid
j � F" L't

N DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2 1 2- 0 1 E
Projectl6ite: GG —��
Latitude: 3 5, 3 24 1(o7
Evaluator: +416fr-t�t]we + NO-nt-jL S CO-f'
County, S"G n tG
Longitude: - 80. 1-19-725;_
Total Points: r J
l
Stream Determination (circle
Other prY�ri_ar Le
Stream is at least intermfttent ''
if a 19 or perennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent renniai
e.g- Quad Name: Zd (a
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = ( 1
Absent
Weak
Moderafr
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2_ Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
',12
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool; step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5, Activelrelict fioodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(,1
2
3
T Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
F
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. hlatural vai[ey
0
0.5
11- Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in anual
B- Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7 m]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
t
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14- Leaf litter
sLiQ1
0,5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
r0-5
1
1.5
16- Organic debris lines or piles
0
`-T-5
r1
_ 1,5
IT Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes .= 3
C_ Bioloav (Subtotal = %) . r. ]
18- Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19- Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
`_V_
:,P_
2
3
21- Aquatic Mollusks
0
1'
2
3
22- Fish
0
0-5
1
T.5
23- Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24- Amphibians
0
1.5
25- Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FA = 0.75; ❑6L = 1.5 Other,,, 0
'perennial stree-s may also be identified using other method 5Be p. 35 of manuaI-
Notes: r n r 4 r 5
era cs P�
� ^ 1
Sketch: J p� J -�� r 1
Bank Height Ittl: r
Bankfull width {ft):r'r
Water depth (m)
Channel substrate:- Clay Sift, and, Gravel Cobb]
Bedrock
velocity — fast, moderate, slow°r
Clarity; rear lightly turbid, turbid

.NU 13 W q 7tream aaenttt[canan r orm v ersion 4.11
Date: 2/ 2 1 :2-0 I E Project/Site: ACC TD Latitude: 3. 3'28.70 2-
Eva I u ato r: ( &1 mo(A-1[ I +Ncknry Sea+ county: S-�av)Longitude:-1?Q.7 ]$ 197
Total Points: �� Stream Determination circle one) Other A)'a mixr LL
Stream is at least intermittenf v„/ Ephemeral-!71 rmittent P rennial e.g. Quad Hama: 2 o i to
4if z 19 or erenniaf if? 30'
A, Geomorphology ( Subtotal =
Absent
Weak 7
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3 -
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure- ex- riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. AG5ve/reiiCt floodplain
0
2
3
5. Depositional bars or benches
' 4
1
2
3
7- Recent alluvial deposits
0~
1
2
3
8, Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0-5
1
11- Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes - 3
" artlflciai ditches are not rated; see dlscuons in manual
12. Presence of Baseflow
'
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
p
i
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
i
1-5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1 5
17. Soil -based evidence of high ter table?
No 0)
Yes =3
r 1QWnn» fCzkl1K+n+01 - fri 1
18- Fibrous roots fn streambed
2
1
0
12- Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macro benthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
(0
0.5
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FAGW = 0.75; DSL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial strezrs may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual,
Notes: -rrk: _ Pd.4i; ,frP
nad=,
Sketch:p� �a a �,. �,
1
Bank Height (ft). f -3
sankfull width
Water depth (in): �fr
Channel substrate Cla�- 1t, San , Gravel, Cob
@edrflck
velocity -fast, moderate, slow tf�
Clarity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid ���

'�_t
NC DWa Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �' Z 31'�
Project,lSlte:
Latitude:
r�r 7
Evaluator: t+
Gouri .
ty'
�� t 14
Longitude: J
�d � r✓
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
,+ , i r
Stream Determination (circlg
Ephemeral Intermittent P rennial
Other 1
a.g. Ruad Name:
if a 19 or erennraf if a 30'
A, Geomorphology Subtotal = 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of Channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1,�2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5- Activelrelict floodplain
0
i
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 1 7
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. f-leadcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
CIL
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.1-5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolog (Subtotal = r
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
I?
1
2
3
14. Leaf Iitter
1,5
1
0.5
0
15, Sediment on p€ants or debris
0
0:5
1
1 5
15- Organic debris lines or piles
0
5
1
1 5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No - 0
Yes4— 3 Y
C. Siolo Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 f
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed/7
2
1
0
20. Mac obenthos [note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2.
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
q '
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1-5
23. Crayfish
0-5
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
a
0.5
1
1-5
25. Algae
; 0 _:
05
1
1-5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75, OBL = 1.5 Other IJ 1
'perennial streeTs may also be identifted using other methods. See p 35 of manual
Notes: i -;,
Sketch
Bank Height [fta:
Bankfull width (ft) —{f
Water depth (in 1;
Channel subtrat = Cla Silt, Sand ravel Cobb
drgFk�
Velocity -fast, moderate,,§6 .)
Chanty, r,d arm, Tightly turbid, turbid

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2-12_3 ) 2-61$
ProjectfSPte: �^� C�i�
Latitude: 35. 32_77z5
Evaluator �U+�jnYj�}OWIAI 4 Ndt SCOW
County: S� a_r L J
Longitude: _�U• �7q (�:�
Total Points:
Stream Determination !circle one
Other
Stream Is at least intermft[errt �S�
if? 99 or erennialif? 30` _23 , 5 -
Ephemeral Intermitten ' nnia
e.g. Quad Name: ? p �Q
A. Georn orpholog y (Subtotal = -17 f
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
1a Continurty of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. ln-channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
00
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelre I ict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6- Depositional }cars or benches
4
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8- Headcuts
t
1
2
3
9- Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10- Natural valley
0
1 0-5
1
1,5
11. Second or greater order channel
❑ = 22
Yes = 3
it artlfloial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvelrolonv (Subtotal = 9' .
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2)
3
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1j
2
3
14- Leaf litter
i.5
i
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
Z7-5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
a.5
1
1-5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye ' = 3
C. Biology {Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19- Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos [note diversity and abundance]
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
{ 13
1
2
3 l
22- Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
t 5
1
1.5
24_ Amphibians
0
0-5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
25. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1, 5 CJiE � =
'perennial strew rs may also be identified using other methods. See p- M5 of manual-
Nates: Sf� i� A ,r,�r� S{'rCRr"'N-I-}�pt S See c-caF_- 4-'ecl. wl, Q1 ri
A r' -I eA I C a I n j r S i' !
t I S OpA g-
i.1 I i +f". .4 f f J 2 r
unr #C �ti-1 (aod S . 1 O pod 0 V hpl
1pr�}�(�
T r j /j 1
�p � S¢ � j`f
r vo -? 1 Stil - peol< Bank Height (ft): i '
-6ankfull width (ft): I
Water depth (inf: j ` P4
Channel substrate - ay, Silt, Sand, Grave
Bedrock �
velocity - fast, moderate, "
Clarity- c ea , slightly turbid, turbid
�
,Cobble,

_}__
bl')
.N C U W Q stream luentification c orm version 4.11
Date: 2123 � 2012 Pra}ecflSiie: v.� Latitude: 35, 3219�33
Evaluator. 3N�o 4+, Ar, ,DLAA County: S+G n Longitude: -go. 1 `j (o 19j
Total Points: Stream Determirtatio rcle one) Other A �)3C)Vi[wl 1{-
Stream is at least intermittent i Ephemera ent Pe nnial e.g, Quad Name: ��]
if 2: 19 or perennial it a 30' r 1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = p ,
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a-Continuityofchannel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. 'Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 -.
2
3
3. In -channel structure. ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
n [e- oo[ sequence
0
2
3
4, Particle size of stream substrate
0
t
'"
3
5- Active/re Iict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
f
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
r'• t •
1.5
10. Natu ra l va lley
0
0.5
1
5
11. Second or greater order channel
NoO
Yes -3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussigns in manual r
R !-tsmlrnEnn� /Ci ii�finfal = � � +'] 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13- Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
5
1
1.5
16_ Organic debris lines or piles
0
#-b
1
1.5
17, Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No =
Yes
r, Pinlr rnv M11hfnfa1= '-T 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
r 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
2Z Fish
0 '
0-5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24- Amphibians
DO0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0-5
1
1.5
25. Wetland plants in streambed
J
FACW = 075; DBL = 1.5 Other
`perennial strew Ts may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Dotes:
7
, e r ice,
f
_
Sketch: l� j
j�%�� �!' -, I' T
Bank Height (ftl: �� t
6ankfull width (ft)f `�I!
water depth (in): J
Channel substrate�Cra , Silt, Sand, Gra+rel Cobble
-- Bedrock
velocity - fast, moderate, slow 9 fioo
Clar' dear lightly turbid, turbid
wry, l y`

0. 9
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2./ 2 3 121 ❑ 4 $
Projecusite: k-6- ',S'
Latitude: 35. 3 z ' [n
Evaluator: r4a*avi pwe-lit No%'+c--j =�tU
County: S+6Lyj{,
Longitude: _80, l-7S"2_I5
Total Points: r�
Stream is least Intermittent Jl
Stream Determination �circl
Other /� l� ov,r- te-
at
if ? 19 ❑r erennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent erennl
e.g Quad Name: {
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
strong
10 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
LV
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
i
2•
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool. sequence
0
1
+�
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
.1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
f 1
2
3
8- Neadcuts
0
i
2
3
9- Grade control
0
! �0.5v,_
1
1.5
10- Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1-5
11. Second or greater order channel
Na7 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B- Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14- Leaf litter
0.5
0
15. Sediment on p€ants or debris
1-5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 53
C_ Biology (Subtotal = 7 ]
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
I'
2
1
19, Rooted upland plants in streambed
1 3
2
1
0
20- Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0-5
1
1.5
24- Amphibians
0
•0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
4
0
1
1-5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75; 081- = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial sirea-rs may also be identified using other rnethods. See p 35 of mane I
Notes:
F �
'
Sketch X� �� r .� t; a r J f }
1 "
Bank Height h (:) r
Ban kfull. width (ftj:
Water depth (inj�
Channel substra - Clay. Silt, Sand Gravel• Cobbl
Bedrock
Velocity - Fast mfa oderate w
Clarity clear. htly turbid, turbid

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/22/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WA-9 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.332907 Long:-80.179595 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Oakboro silt loam 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Wetlands WB, WH, WI, WK, WM, WN, WP, WW, WX, WY, and WZ all share similar hydrologic, floristic,
and edaphic properties with Wetland WA. Therefore, they will be covered by this form
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 7
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA-9 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Quercus phellos
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
2. Vaccinium sp.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 345 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.88
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
15 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Chasmanthium laxum
15 Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex sp.
4. Lycopus sp.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WA-9 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-5 2.5Y 5/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
5-12 2.5Y 8/1 90
10YR 5/8 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,
1479 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/22/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WA-3 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 25
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.332478 Long:-80.179443 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston very channery silt loam, 15-45% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Due to the similarity of their floristic, hydrologic, and edaphic properties, this upland form can be used for the upland plots associated with wetlands
WB, WH, WI, WK, WM, WN, WP, WW, WX, WY, and WZ.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA-3 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Quercus montana
30 Yes
UPL
Number of Dominant Species
2. Quercus alba
30 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Juniperus virginiana
30 Yes
FACU
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
2.
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
UPL species 30 x 5 = 150
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 435 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.14
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
30 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Hexastylis arifolia
15 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WA-3 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 6/3 90
2.5Y 6/6 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
6-12 2.5Y 6/3 50
2.5Y 6/6 50
Loamy/Clayey Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,
1479 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/22/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WC-3 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain/Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat -Convex Slope (%): 0-15%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.334249 Long:-80.178507 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Oakboro silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Disturbed); (Wetlands WG, WL, and WS are all disturbed bottomland hardwood forests, which possess
similar floristic, edaphic, and hydrologic propoerties)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC-3 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
FACU species 40 x 4 = 160
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 110 (A) 330 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
40 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Dactylis glomerata
40 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rubus sp.
4. Lycopus sp.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WC-3 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 6/2 80
10YR 5/8 20 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-12 2.5Y 7/1 80
10YR 5/8 20 C M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,
1479 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/22/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WC-3 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 15%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.334463 Long:-80.178832 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston very channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This upland form can be applied to the upland plots for Wetlands WG, WL, and WS due to the similarity of their hydrologic, floristic, and edaphic
properties.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC-3 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2. Pinus taeda
30 Yes
FAC
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 160 (A) 580 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.63
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
60 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Andropogon virginicus
50 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Dactylis glomerata
50 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rubus sp.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WC-3 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 6/4 90
2.5Y 6/6 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
6-12 2.5Y 6/4 100
Loamy/Clayey Rocky
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,
1479 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/22/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WJ-12 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Old Pond Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.33713 Long:-80.174161 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Misenheimer channery silt loam, 0-4% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest; (This wetland used to be an old pond before the dam was breached)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WJ-12 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Salixnigra
40 Yes
OBL
Number of Dominant Species
2. Alnus serrulata
30 Yes
OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 110 x 1 = 110
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. Salix nigra
20 Yes
OBL
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2. Alnus serrulata
20 Yes
OBL
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 135 (A) 180 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
40 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Zephyranthes atamasca
5 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
20 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WJ-12 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture
Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/2 70
7.5YR 4/6 30 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/22/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WJ-12 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.33713099 Long:-80.174745 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston very channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland plot located in adjacent agricultural field
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WJ-12 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Absent
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 10 (A) 40 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Allium vineale
10 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WJ-12 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/4 90
10YR 5/6 10
Loamy/Clayey
6-12 2.5Y 5/4 100
Loamy/Clayey Rocky
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,
1479 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WQ-8A Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5-10%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.33629 Long:-80.171517 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Misenheimer channery silt loam, 0-4% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WQ-8A Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Ulmus rubra
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Ligustrum sinense
40 Yes
FACU
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
2.
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 160 (A) 520 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.25
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
40 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Zephyranthes atamasca
15 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Allium vineale
15 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
15 Yes
FAC
2. Toxicodendron radicans
15 Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WQ-8A Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-10 2.5Y 6/3 80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
10-12
Rock
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
While this wetland possessed a marginal chroma color (2.5Y 6/2 - 6/3), strong redox concentrations, the wetlands hydrologic indicators, and it's
geomorphic position led to its ultimate designation as a wetland.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WQ-8A Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5-10%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.336393 Long:-80.171731 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Misenheimer channery silt loam, 0-4% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WQ-8A Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Pinus virginiana
20 Yes
UPL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Carya ovata
40 Yes
FACU
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
2. Ligustrum sinense
20 Yes
FACU
FACU species 105 x 4 = 420
3. Juniperus virginiana
20 Yes
FACU
UPL species 20 x 5 = 100
4.
Column Totals: 160 (A) 625 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.91
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
80 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: S radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Allium vineale
20 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes
FAC
2. Lonicera japonica
5 Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WQ-8A Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-5 2.5Y 7/4 60 10YR 4/3 40 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 Rock
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WT-8 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 10-15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.332441 Long:-80.170483 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Kirksey silt loam, 0-6% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest. (Wetlands WD, WE, WF, WO, WR, and WV all possess similar edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic properties. Therefore,
they are included under this form.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WT-8 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Ulmus rubra
30 Yes
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Ligustrum sinense
20 Yes
FAC
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2.
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 85 (A) 250 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.94
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
15 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Allium vineale
10 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
10 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WT-8 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 2.5Y 6/2 75 10YR 5/8 25 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
8-12 Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WT-8 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.332319 Long:-80.170856 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Kirksey silt loam, 0-6% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Due to the similarity of their floristic, edaphic, and hydrologic properties, this upland data form can be used for the upland plots associated with
Wetlands WD, WE, WF, WO, WR, and WV.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WT-8 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Juniperus virginiana
30 Yes
FACU
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 370 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.70
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
30 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Andropogon virginicus
20 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Allium vineale
10 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WT-8 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WAA-2 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Old Pond Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.329688 Long:-80.175838 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest (Disturbed). This used to be an old pond, but has slowly filled in and is functioning as a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAA-2 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Absent
FAC
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 80 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Typha latifolia
40 Yes
OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Juncus effusus
20 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WAA-2 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/6 25 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WAA-2 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.329627 Long:-80.176119 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland plot in agricultural field
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uips ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAA-2 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Absent
FAC
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 20 (A) 80 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Allium vineale
20 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WAA-2 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-12 2.5Y 6/4 100 Loamy/Clayey Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Soil taken in agricultural field
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WAB-2 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5-10%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.328902 Long:-80.175669 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest (Distuebed); (Wetland WU possesses similar floristic, hyrdologic, and edaphic properties and can be covered by this
form)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAB-2 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
2.
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 365 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.48
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Dactylis glomerata
70 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Juncus effusus
20 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex sp.
4. Rubus sp.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WAB-2 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-5 2.5Y 6/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
5-12 Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WAB-2 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 15%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.329085 Long:-80.175497 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This upland form can also be used for Wetland WU's Upland plot. They possess similar floristic, hydrologic, and edaphic properties
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uips ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAB-2 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
2.
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 85 (A) 325 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.82
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Dactylis glomerata
70 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Rubus sp.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WAB-2 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/4 100
6-12 Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WAC-2 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.330351 Long:-80.178092 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Seep
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAC-2 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Absent
FAC
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 80 (A) 280 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.50
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Dactylis glomerata
60 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Juncus effusus
20 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rubus sp.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WAC-2 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/6 25 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
8-12 Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Albemarle Corporate Center PJD City/County: Stanly Sampling Date: 2/23/2018
Applicant/Owner: City of Albemarle State: NC Sampling Point: WAC-2 Upl
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Nancy Scott Section, Township, Range: Albemarle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.330736 Long:-80.178071 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston channery silt loam, 4-15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version .0
uo M1illy k uiNs ui r_nyuieeis

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAC-2 Upl
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B;
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Absent
FAC
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 15 (A) 60 (B
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportirn
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Allium vineale
15 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: WAC-2 Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-12 2.5Y 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey Rocky
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Appendix C
Agent Authorization Form
JD Request Form
Preliminary JD Form

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY -LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 654702867363
STREET ADDRESS: South Business 52
Please print:
Property Owner: City of Albemarle
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Larry Thompson oaf Thompson Environmental Consulting,Inc.
(Contractor j Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
144 N. Second Street, Albemarle, NC 28001
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted In this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date: March 20, 2018

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wshtng[on ❑iArio[
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Missions/Re._ ul�atoiyPermitProgram/Contact/Coun!yLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: South Business 52
City, State:
Albemarle, NC
County: Stanly County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 654702867363
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Larry Thompson
Mailing Address: PO BOX 541
Midland, NC 28107
Telephone Number: 704-301-4881
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Citv of Albemarle
Mailing Address: 144 N 2nd Street
Albemarle, NC 28001
Telephone Number: 704-984-9435
Electronic Mail Address:
i Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Larry Thompson
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ✓❑ Authorized Agents
03/08/18
Date
Signature -�
E. t ASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 283 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
FVI
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.332169
Longitude:-80.174373
17 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re"latory-Permit-
P ro gram/Juri sdi ction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
A Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
0 USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
F] Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/does/regulatory/re2does/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.arM.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and onthe Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/13/201 8
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Larry Thompson
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Stanly City: Albemarle
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.332425 Long.:-80.173542
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Poplin Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See
Attached
List

Aquatic resources in the review area which "mav be" subiect to re2ulatory iurisdiction
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Type of
aquatic
resource
Geographic
authority to which
aquatic resource
"ma be" subject
Poplin Branch
35.329189
-80.179851
918 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SA -I
35.333592
-80.169850
167 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SA-P
35.334705
-80.175871
4,509 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SB
35.333226
-80.179501
145 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SC
35.333206
-80.17959
33 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SD
35.334024
-80.177242
453 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SE
35.33634
-80.174966
1,409 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SF -I
35.336212
-80.177339
250 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SF-P
35.335729
-80.177252
321 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SG
35.334017
-80.173073
619 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SI
35.336213
-80.171833
71 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Si
35.336076
-80.171505
51 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SK
35.333789
-80.170047
73 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SL-I
35.328702
-80.178974
988 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SL-P
35.329352
-80.176014
467 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SM
35.327735
-80.179365
23 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SN-I
35.328932
-80.176193
153 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
SN-P
35.328682
-80.175214
164 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
WA
35.332907
-80.179595
0.21 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WB
35.333688
-80.178717
0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WC
35.334249
-80.178507
0.54 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WD
35.333546
-80.17665
0.06 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WE
35.332684
-80.176632
0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WF
35.334377
-80.177566
0.06 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WG
35.334721
-80.177048
0.05 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WH
35.335204
-80.176899
0.12 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WI
35.335525
-80.17636
0.02 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wi
35.33713
-80.174161
0.23 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WK
35.335086
-80.176584
0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WL
35.334636
-80.176121
0.09 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WM
35.334787
-80.174889
0.07 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WN
35.334522
-80.174081
< 0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WO
35.333106
-80.172722
0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WP
35.335595
-80.172475
0.05 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WQ
35.33629
-80.171517
0.08 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WR
35.335013
-80.170169
0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WS
35.333056
-80.170115
0.30 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WU
35.331461
-80.171193
0.06 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WV
35.330447
-80.171685
0.05 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WW
35.329873
-80.179918
0.03 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WX
35.32974
-80.180089
< 0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WY
35.328351
-80.179434
0.12 acre
Wetland
Section 404

Aquatic resources in the review area which "may be" subject to regulatory _jurisdiction (continued)
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Type of
aquatic
resource
Geographic
authority to which
the aquatic resource
"ma be" subject
WZ
35.327663
-80.179349
< 0.01 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WAA
35.329688
-80.175838
0.16 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WAB
35.328902
-80.175669
0.09 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WAC
35.330351
-80.178092
0.03 acre
Wetland
Section 404
PA
35.334806
-80.178308
0.05 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
PB
35.333527
-80.170176
0.23 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
PC
35.330753
-80.171632
0.12 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
PD
35.328346
-80.179222
0.04 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
PE
35.327163
-80.179201
0.70 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
PF
35.326171
-80.178839
0.58 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
I — Intermittent
P — Perennial
Note: Wetland WT was combined with WS. Thus, WT no longer exists.

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
■❑
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 :24,000 Albemarle
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1989 soil survey of stanly county, NC
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
f 03/08/18
Signature and date of
pF•rson requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.