NC0000272_Results of 2000 Dioxin Monitoring Fish Tissue_20000101

RESULTS OF 2000
DIOXIN MONITORING IN FISH TISSUE
Prepared for:
Blue Ridge Paper Products
Canton Mill
Canton, North Carolina
Prepared by:
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
444 Lake Cook Road, Suite 18
Deerfield, IL 60015
January 2001
13745.01

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Listof Tables...................................................................................... iii
Listof Figures...................................................................................... v
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................... vii
1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................1-1
2. SAMPLING LOCATIONS.....................................................................2-1
3. SAMPLING OBJECTIVES....................................................................3-1
4. FISH COLLECTION TECHNIQUES AND LEVEL OF EFFORT .....................4-1
5. SAMPLE PREPARATION....................................................................5-1
6. ANALYTICAL RESULTS......................................................................6-1
7. REFERENCES...................................................................................7-1
APPENDIX A: CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS
APPENDIX B: SEVERN TRENT LABORATORY-SACRAMENTO
ANALYTICAL REPORTS

LIST OF TABLES
Number Title Page
2-1 Pigeon River sampling station information..........................................2-2
4-1 Fish collection techniques and level of effort .......................................4-2
4-2 Summary of fish composites collected in the Pigeon River,
August2000.............................................................................4-3
6-1 Summary of Pigeon River fish tissues analysis results--2000.....................6-2
6-2 Toxicity equivalence factors for CDD/F isomers..................................6-4
6-3 Summary of CDD/F isomer analyses, toxicity equivalent
factors, and toxicity equivalent values for the 2000 Pigeon
River fish tissue composites............................................................6-5
6-4 Blue Ridge Paper Canton Mill fish fillet tissue analysis results
1990-2000.............................................................................. 6-11
iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sportfish and bottom feeding species were collected in 2000 from six locations in the Pigeon
River and analyzed for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) and other CDD and CDF isomers. TCDD and TCDF
residues were not detected in any of the 10 sportfish fillet composites collected downstream of
the Blue Ridge Paper Canton mill. Sportfrsh used were redbreast sunfish, rock bass, black
crappie, and smallmouth bass. TCDD and TCDF concentrations in fillet composites from
bottom feeders were very low (range=non-detected to 1.2 ppt) at the three riverine. locations
downstream of the mill. Bottom feeders used at these locations were common carp and black
redhorse. TCDD concentrations in bottom feeder fillet composites at the two Waterville Lake
locations were 1.1 ppt and 4.4 ppt (Stations 4A and 4B, respectively) for carp, 0.70 ppt for
channel catfish at Station 4A and non -detect for flathead catfish at Station 4B. Since 1990,
TCDD concentrations in common carp fillets have declined dramatically (87-98 percent) at all
downstream stations (Figure ES-1).
vii

FIGURE ES-1. TCDD CONCENTRATIONS IN CARP FILLETS COLLECTED FROM
THE PIGEON RIVER, 1990-2000 (Stations 2 and 3).
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
YEAR
E- Station 2..... -I-..... Station 3

LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title Page
FS-1 TCDD concentrations in carp fillets collected from the Pigeon River,
1990-2000 ............................. ...
2-1 Sampling Station locations on the Pigeon River - North Carolina reach ........ 2-3
2-2 Sampling Station No. 1 on the Pigeon River.......................................2-4
2-3 Sampling Station No. 2 on the Pigeon River.......................................2-5
2-4 Sampling Station No. 3 on the Pigeon River.......................................2-6
2-5 Sampling Station No. 4A on the Pigeon River.....................................2-7
2-6 Sampling Station No. 4B on the Pigeon River......................................2-8
2-7 Sampling Station No. 5 on the Pigeon River.......................................2-9
6-1 TCDD concentrations in carp fillets collected from the Pigeon River,
1990-2000.............................................................................. 6-17
a
v

X
FIGURE ES-1
(Cont.).
TCDD CONCENTRATIONS IN CARP FILLETS COLLECTED FROM
THE PIGEON RIVER, 1990-2000 (Stations 4A and 413).
70
A
60
`..%..................................
50 ............................
...............................................................................................................................................
....................................... ..:
40..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
30..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
20.................
.................... ........... ....... ......... ........ ........................................................................................................................
................................................................................ ...........
--
10....................._..._....................................
--.............................................
^........................,..........._........._.................................._,._..........-:.__ ,..............................................................................
------------A
0
1990 1991 1992
1993
1994 1995 1996 1997 1996 1999 2000
-Ab - Station 4a Station 4b

1. INTRODUCTION
This report details the results of a study conducted during 2000 to determine the concentrations
of 2,3,7,8,-TCDD (dioxin) and 2,3,7,8-TCDF (furan) in fish collected from the Pigeon River
near Canton, North Carolina. The study described herein is number 11 in a series of fish
tissue surveys designed and conducted to be completely responsive to the requirements of Part
III, Special Conditions Section (paragraph H) in Blue Ridge Paper's current NPDES permit for
the Canton Mill (Permit No. NC0000272). Sampling locations, selection of target species,
sampling methods, and sample preparation/preservation techniques are in accordance with
study plan details submitted to U.S. EPA Region IV during February 1990 (EA 1990). The
approved study methods and scope detailed herein follow those reported in the 1990, 1991,
! 1992 and 1993 Pigeon River dioxin study documents prepared by EA Engineering, Science,
and Technology (EA 1991, 1992, 1993a and 1993b). The 1994-2000 (EA 1994, 1995, 1996,
1997, 1998, 1999, and the present study) fish tissue surveys maintained the basic study
framework of the previous years; however, selected project details were modified to be
responsive to the suggestions/recommendations of the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, and
U.S. EPA Region IV.
The 2000 study was conducted during 15-21 August, during which time biologists from EA
collected and prepared fish tissue samples from six sampling locations on the Pigeon River.
Details relevant to the location of Pigeon River sampling stations and fish tissue sampling
objectives follow in Sections 2 and 3, respectively. Fish collection techniques and level of
effort are detailed in Section 4; methods of sample preparation and shipment are presented in
Section 5. Analytical results are summarized in Section 6 and references are provided in
Section 7.
1-1

2. SAMPLING LOCATIONS
In accordance with the study plan submitted to U.S. EPA Region IV (EA 1990), fish were
collected from five locations on the Pigeon River. Four monitoring stations were located
downstream from the Canton Mill outfall, and one control or background site was located
upstream of it. In response to a special request from U.S. EPA Region IV, an additional
downstream monitoring station was established in Tennessee in 1992. Thus since 1992, six
locations have been sampled. Detailed sampling station information is provided in Table 2-1 and
Figure 2-1.
Station 1, the background site, is located at Pigeon River Mile (RM) 64.5, approximately 1.2 RM
upstream from the Canton Mill outfall (Figures 2-1 and 2-2). Fish were collected from the river
reach adjacent to the Canton Recreational Park (located upstream from the city of Canton).
Except under extremely high flows, the Canton Mill dam blocks the movement of fishes and
thereby prevents the interaction of control and downstream monitoring station fishes. Monitoring
Station 2 is located upstream from Clyde, North Carolina at RM 59.0, approximately 4.3 RM
downstream from the Canton Mill outfall (Figures 2-1 and 2-3). Station 3 is 11.0 RM
downstream from the outfall (RM 52.3), in the vicinity of the old Rt. 209 bridge (Figures 2-1 and
2-4). Monitoring stations 4A and 4B are located in Waterville Lake at RM 41.5 and 39.0,
respectively (Figure 2-1). Station 4A is located approximately 21.8 RM downstream from the
Mill outfall, near the Messer Branch -Pigeon River confluence (Figure 2-5). Monitoring Station
4B is in the vicinity of the Wilkins Creek -Pigeon River confluence, approximately 24.3 RM
downstream from the Canton Mill outfall (Figure 2-6). Station 5 is located near Bluffton,
Tennessee at RM 19.0, approximately 44.3 RM downstream from the Mill outfall and about 6
miles downstream of the CP&L Hydro site (Figure 2-7). Sampling stations were separated by at
least 5.5 RM (with the exception of the Waterville Lake stations which are only 2.5 RM apart).
All appropriate habitats were sampled within each study reach in an effort to collect the desired
complement of fishes. Brief site/habitat descriptions are provided in Table 2-1.
Fish sampling was conducted in the vicinity of each location described above, however, the
distance sampled at each station depended on how difficult it was to collect fish at that station.
At Station 1, an approximate 0.3 RM reach was sampled which extended from just upstream of
the downstream most River Road (Rt. 215) Bridge to the canoe launch area by the city park. The
Station 2 sample reach was approximately 0.3 RM in length and was adjacent to a sharp bend
along Old Thickety Road. The Station 3 sample reach extended approximately 0.3 RM, near the
old Rt. 209 bridge. At Station 4A, an approximate 0.4 RM reach of Waterville Lake was sampled
adjacent to and upstream from the Messer Branch -Pigeon River confluence. The Station 4B
study area consisted of a 1.0 RM reach of Waterville Lake located near the Wilkins Creek -Pigeon
River confluence. Sampling at Stations 4A and 4B included gillnetting near the shore along both
the left and right banks of Waterville Lake. At Station 5, an approximate 0.1 RM reach was
sampled in the vicinity of the I-40 Bridge.
2-1

-uoowwooun onm sp!goswluao'sseq loos pue sseq Ignotuguws seon palood ul sul9nw (Ile)Ino gtW uoluuD agl
so) Idaoxg vowwoa onm wdlnDs papuuq puu'npep 9uo!u snug omos ip!m olggoo pue'np!noq •llawpoq dluewud wa) lueaslsumoP WU E'6b) oauanguoo
ap!suaas8 •nmys adoasalal •nwys l!elol!ym'sse9 41now11etuS aleslsgnS 'U 8 o19'IWlewtxmdde gldap wnw!xelH 'saglu Izan 8ogpunw!) agl wos) wuzgsumop
quewwop asam nllans Boy waypou pue ngonuols IenuaO mogegs awos glim sum pue slood doop 6q p32ual3eng3 '!yl•'uoWnIg mu nA!g uoaBld 0'61
vowwoa anm dna puu'gsgleo peatheu 'II!gonle
,adder llaelq •Iq powulmop Iplea)o aouepunga angefoU
vowwoa anm dreg pue 'gsglea !auuega'11!8an!g
,atdden slaelq Aq paluu!wop yalea)o aouupunge antlefoll
vowwoa sum ngonuols lesluoO -luelnwop
anm ossogpas lfaelq pue •nllans 8oq Iuogpou •gsUuns Iseasgpall
•nllans 8oq unyyou pue •nlfonuols
lequaa tlsUuns Iseosgpos 6q poluu!wop sum oauepunge onpepU
•nnoa agl!I ql!m mpteq doolS 'U 06 6lalewlxosdde
paldwes gldap wntutxepg sluaw!pas molloq Uos pue
'jaospoq'lel!quq anuol Salem-doop 6q paz!nloengO
•nnoa olull ql!m slpmq doo1S 'U 6l XNlew!xosdde
paldwes yldap wnw!xely -sluatu!pas wolloq Uos pue
•>faospoq )Ll!gvq otlual muss-doap dq pozualaese40
(Ile)lno
g!W uolueO agl wos) weoslsumop
Nil E't z) aauanguoo nAnd uoo0!d
-430JO suPWAX ayl aoau allvf 01!An1eM 0'6E up
(IIu)lno
II!W uoltre0 ay1 wos) wnilsumop
WU 8'IZ) aauanguoa nA!Il uoa8!d
-gatresg nssayl OT seau alle7 011!A IuA% S'l0 VF
scan food ut papsodap s3ul/lanea8/pues pue afggoa
(Uepno g!W uoluvO atp wos)
auras tp!m ssopinoq pue llaospoq Sgntuud alwlsgnS
lneatlSUMOP WU 0'I1) aattanguoa AawO
'U S •llaletu!xosdde gldap wnw!xulq •nnoa 6douea
aaAgwO wos) w¢aslsdn a8puq 60Z
awos gl!m slepgeq food puu'um'aWp dq pazualoen40
'I'd ogl)o,SlwulA ayl ui nA uw8td E'ZS
-laospaq pue snpinoq awos g11As puesganeapfggoa,ifuewud
'(Ile)lno ll!W
oluslsgnS •U S,Slolew!sosdde tgdop wntwxely •sanoa
uolueO aql woy weaslsumop WU E'>)
.Cdouea gltm slegtgeq foal pue'um blgu dg pazuoperegO
ON'op,CIO wos) uxrzgsdn nA!y uoa8td 0'65
vowwoo anm u!dlnas poluow puu'"pup oplsuoos8 j3llmouols
Iwluao •ysUuns Iseaigpos 7ouufs sonim bssoypos lfaufy •solloils •pueS puu laneb Ig!m pavadsnlul snpinoq
8oq usagpoN -imulwop onm snq )loos pue npep uUuaofd'gnga pue olggoo Al!nwud oleAsgnS *U 9 dlolewlxwdde gldap
son!U snpep pue smoww 6q palewwop aauepunge an!lefag wnw!xuN 'sleltgeg lood puu'um'oW!i Xq pazualoengo
I!unwwoO gs13 a •L1e1!qu11/uo17 wsa0 apS
NOLLV WU03NI NOW.VIS ONI'IdWVS HBAM NOaOld I-Z 9-19V1
'(lle)lno II!1V
uolueO wa) weaslsdn 1Y1[ Z'1) llsud
luuopeanag uolueO of luaaefpNOlq
•uolueO wm) ureaslsdn nntU uoa8ld
IIe•On0 wa) aauels!O
ptw uogeao•q uogelS
S'49
afryg ngwnN
nAIU no!IeIS

Walters
aloochee Station 4111
Creak' RM 39.0 k
White Oak
Creek' r
Wilkins Crack
Station 4A
RM
I41.5
WATERVILLE LACE
(Ines Creek
New Hapco 6ridgc
4A
\ Flow �. Ferguson Bridge
✓onathon5 toe
Crack Gtab �oey-
G
3 Station 3
RM 52.3
Station 2 Fiberville
RM 59.0
Clyde STP 1
Waynesville STP RM 57.1 Mill Outfall
RM 50.4 2 RM 63.3
Gtc° ® Station 1 O�
Clyde I1M G4.5
(Control) ))
Figure 2A. Sampling station locations on the Pigeon River - North Carolina Reach.
LN"
-Canton, NC

Figure 2-2. Sampling Station No. 1 on the Pigeon River.
M%O
2-4

Ckv
u .✓ h., k
r hY.
�
•ice:,; �• 11 kkkk emu.
iG ,�\, " ' .�' • _mil L � � 1`. - f �`+ r
'_-j.7 <8 jStation 2 i TZ
�; � .a , L'«?low'; . �e°° \�''J/^•/'/ _ .�`� - \
I,•/'��•l k�jG s�fn
/ Clyde.: PR.
IY
. e / y w `o ` •%. ••r� r i \ ! �� / s •`• r� ��RdRYeGl�ir
•uiigh s`"•' ; •:.. ter.:. i 1GF' �• " i.eca - - ^��' 1 T IIv^ �. , -/
_ L�J
� .Ges _�k.'•—\.. rx , r 1' ./�• 7'. !M�•ti-.f_C_ir.---_- ��-�r
_ 't ••Y •'��'• /.. .::-__ Ali r�/.
.\,%J,/i ...�zsant itl,Cem )'! C($'IJprE exoial—K�
_ __ • ` +; � �-• J mac` /� IV/ ,-/-" �✓
• M�I ' Fn es4 .'Ek.::^`:.1 r /v\ O / / ice.
91c �✓ �' � 4
• JN
L - y .0 �Siy:3;ibyCoStar�}ey ove
Figure 2-3. Sampling Station No. 2 on the Pigeon River.

Figure 2-4. Sampling Station No. 3 on the Pigeon River.
2-6

N
J
1 11
�!�'- �7 i � Ii� 1 %j Q�t� t � �,§. �� ( \�� J1 l�7 / �• � hy� '•- ,' lV4 l
b
40,\�-••fir 11 \—
to
m
co
43
co
in
� ', nrm�i ,' _- ia'.� CEi.�\.�,,. %.\ � \`• n, ( `�i � - �\ �!� -�� �� Tin' �/^��``
-G�f,-��1G � ._� �� o�--� •tea � ° � �
Gqd ��>� `=^�at`��:a;/� 1�• „��`) \1 �Ca'�k� � II(n��� ..� Lc-�t�i

Figure 2-6. Sampling Station No. 4B on the Pigeon River.

Figure 2-7. Sampling station No. 5 on the Pigeon River.

3. SAMPLING OBJECTIVES
In accordance with the study plan (EA 1990), the goal of the fish collection effort was to
collect four composite samples at each of the six sampling stations identified in Section 2.
Station -specific objectives included the collection and preparation of one sample composed of
fillet sections from approximately five individual specimens of a representative bottom feeding
species. A second sample was composed of approximately five specimens of a bottom feeder
species for whole -body analysis. According to the study plan, each of the remaining two
composites should contain fillet sections from. approximately five specimens of representative
sport fish species.
Common carp (Cyprinus corpio), white sucker (Catostomus commersoni), and catfish species
(Ameiurus spp. or Ictalurus spp.) are the preferred bottom feeders; while northern hog sucker
(Hypentelium nigiicans), black redhorse (Moxostoma duquesnei), and smallmouth buffalo
(Ictiobus bubalus) are identified as appropriate backup bottom feeding species (EA 1990).
Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), and redbreast
sunfish (Lepoinis awitus) are the recommended target sportfish species; and smallmouth bass
(Micropterus dolomieu), green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), brown trout (Salmo trutta), and
bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) are the recommended alternative target sportfishes. Because of
their importance to the fishery, black crappie is one of the preferred sportfrsh species for
Waterville Lake. Beginning in 1997, a catfish fillet composite has been collected at each of
the two Waterville Lake stations. The catfish fillet composite is in addition to the standard
suite of composites at each Waterville Lake station. If the desired number of species can not
be collected at a station, the onsite fisheries scientist is to exercise best professional judgment
to obtain the best possible sample (EA 1990).
U.S. EPA Region IV (Cunningham 1990) recommended that the smallest specimen in each
composite should be equal to or greater than 75 percent of the total length of the largest
specimen in that composite. Every reasonable effort was made to collect the desired size,
species, and/or number of fish, however, the outcome of the sampling effort is dependent on
physical river conditions and the natural diversity and abundance of target fishes at each
sampling location. The 2000 Pigeon River collections yielded the desired complement of
species at each sampling station. The number of specimens collected made it possible to
composite individuals of similar weight and length (with larger/adult specimens preferred), and
the 75 percent rule was met for all samples, except for fillet composite of five smallmouth bass
at Station 5 (66 percent).
3-1

4. FISH COLLECTION TECHNIQUES AND LEVEL OF EFFORT
Sampling was conducted from 15 August through 21 August 2000. Notes were recorded at
each sampling station with regard to the type of sampling gear, level of effort (time), and
habitat (Table 4-1). Surface temperature measurements at each location are summarized
below:
Station
RM
Date
Temp m
1
64.5
8/21
19.8
2
59.0
8/19
26.7
3
52.3
8/20
24.0
4A
41.5
8/15
25.5
4B
39.0
8/15
24.6
5
19.0
8/18
22.4
Temperature was measured with a YSI temperature/dissolved oxygen meter. All fish
submitted for tissue analysis were measured to the nearest millimeter (total length) and
weighed to the nearest gram (wet weight). These data are summarized in Table 4-2.
The field investigators were equipped with an array of collecting gear which enabled sampling
of all habitats regardless of river conditions. U.S. EPA recommends active methods of fish
collection in their Sampling Guidance Manual (Versar 1984), such as electrofishing, trawling,
angling, or seining. These methods are preferred over passive methods (e.g., gill nets, trap
nets, trotlines) because the collection period is typically shorter (i.e., hours versus days --
thereby minimizing decomposition), and because samples are collected from more definable
areas (Versar 1984). Electrofishing was used at all stations, except 4A and 4B (Waterville
Lake), where gill nets were necessary because of water depth. A boat electrofishing unit
(pulsed direct current) was used to sample fish at Stations 1, 2, 3, and 5. , The boat
electrofisher was equipped with a Smith Root Type VI electrofisher, powered by a 240-volt,
5000W generator. A pram electrofisher, equipped with a Coffelt VVP-2C pulser and powered
by a 120-volt, 1800W generator, was utilized at Stations 1 and 2. Thus, Stations 1 and 2
were sampled by both pram and boat electrofishing techniques. Electrofishing techniques
followed those described in the National Dioxin Study (Versar 1984).
Fish collection techniques and level of effort (time) expended at each of the six stations are
summarized in Table 4-1. Total study effort involved —9 electrofishing-hours and —293
►,1l"

utiejd ayl 8uisn poldules uort od 8mmetual op ylms
pun 8uigmjojpala palunow-leoq v 8u!sn lood a8rzl a nano sossed 9u!ys!jojpzp lexDAos ponlonu! 8u!ldtueS
'olgq°a pl e'"pinoq'l-illoq R[tlewud ale+lsgns!slel!geq leoys lime slood Rq pazualaeleya uoyris `luallaoxa up Og 8u!ysg04'•'131e °H 00 O11V OZ
of poofi R11llq!siA—mol Rlalewpow pue iralo sem lalem'-pxldwes sem laAu Jo yonj 1•vn 1.0 alewtxoidde uV ulw OP Sul sgwpal3 niwd 00 ORtl81 0'6I
savoys 1tI8u pull gal otOpo lsn f slos tau
1112panJonul BmldweS saluilsgns wolloq llos pull lla°ip2q tfltm slul!geq olltwl "ium-&op Rq pozinpungo
uopels'.poo8 Rl!l!q!stn—mol STM Jana[ toiem'poldwes wm jonudo yoeai Iyb 0'1 olew!xoidde try snI-p° 181— slam
11i0(L) OO Ofltl 81-5I 0'6E 8b
saxoys igsli pull Uol oylJlo Isnf
Sias pu II®pan[onw 8ut[d=S soprilsgns wolloq uos pull lloolpoq t0!ns leltgey o!lwl .ulem-loop RpA!Ielai
Rq lwzuapereya uogels poo8 R1!I!q!s!A—mol tonal nlem'poldw is sera tams Jo yarai M b-0 olew!xoidde try sill-lau 90I— Blom II!O ib) OO ORtl 81•9I S'Ib tlb
'I!un 8mysgolpala
palunow-leoq a euiztpin yaeal Pylna at0 Jann saxsud 8unlsgwpola Jwonos panJonu! 8ngdumS rolu8mut
8uo1u pal!xudop xaug/pnut8/puux yym'ralvilxyne nPl°U4 Puu llooipmJ RJuumpd yV.m x1uoJ puu Yum'so[Ou
Rq ilnuopezeya mogets ipoo8 Rppgts!n—nsoJ lanoJ iolem tpaldutus sum nA!i Jo yaeoi M E•0 olew!xoidde UV U!- SI by 1 8wgsg°ipol3leofl 00 ORtl Si E'N
mid Dip
Su!sn poldules wi.11 oil 8utmeulom Dip yltm jwn Sul gopaolo pamnow-leoq a 8wz!pin yoeao otOJo uoi oil
e JOAO sossud 9mysgapaJa J=Aos ponlonm 8uyd=S -sw2mut 8uole pol!sodop saug/lonel8/pues Jim,
'I-jpoq pull siapinoq awns tOtns JDAri2plggoo R[uewud olerysgns!jonoo Rdowso ipon sleltquy lood puu um sty Z 8m4sg°1po131eoe
Rq pazuapereya uo!lels!P°°8 Rl!I!q!sm—mot pool Salem'paJdwes sem son.1 yaeax M E-0 olew!xosddu IN upu ZZ'sq 1 8mgsgotpoJ3 wwd 00 ORtl 61 0'69
weld Dip 8msn poldwes uo!uod 8mu!eww at0 yl!m'I!un 8mysgoiloop palunowquoq
e 8ulzgyn yoroj oylJo uoiVod eJwno somd 8utysgolpap Jelanas panJonul Bwld=S sul8mw 8uolr pulls
pull pner8 iptm pavadsialu! saleiisgns -pinoVlggoa Apnimid ypm Blood Jim Isunx'soJpu Rq pazuaperego mw OP Sul 4s9°ipal3le°fI
!lw°8 RUpgts!n—algele pull mol Ianol Salem :paldules sera JDAU Jo yoeaJ VU E-0 alewtxojdde try Ulm I E'siy I 8u!ysgotpal3 weld OO.ORtl I S'b9
s7a'wn'°O UoD3Jo Jana -I san�uyiay s le0 M uagwnly
8uydweS SmldwUS uoyelS
1110dd3 dO'13ATI ONV S3RaINH0911,101103TIOJ HSId 1-b 3-IHtl.L
N
.7

Table 4-2 Summary of
fish composites
collected at six
stations in
the Pigeon River, August
2000
TOTAL
TOTAL
LENGTH
WHOLE BODY
DATE
STATION
SPECIES
(m)
WEIGHT(G)
SAMPLE TYPE
COMPOSITE
21AUG00
1
REDBREAST SUNFISH
137
60
FILLET
IRF
(RM 64.5)
REDBREAST SUNFISH
142
60
REDBREAST SUNFISH
143
70
REDBREAST SUNFISH
145
70
REDBREAST SUNFISH
148
80
MEAN
143
68
1
21AUG00
ROCK BASS
162
85
FILLET
2RF
ROCK BASS
166
90
ROCK BASS
186
120
ROCK BASS
172
95
ROCK BASS
171
95
MEAN
171
97
21AUG00
BLACK REDHORSE
375
460
FILLET
3RF
BLACK REDHORSE
381
480
BLACK REDHORSE
391
460
BLACK REDHORSE
395
500
BLACK REDHORSE
396
505
MEAN
388
481
21AUG00
NORTHERN HOG SUCKER
297
315
WHOLE BODY
4W8.
NORTHERN HOG SUCKER
258
205
NORTHERN HOG SUCKER
280
250
NORTHERN HOG SUCKER
306
325
NORTHERN HOG SUCKER
245
160
MEAN
277
251
19AUG00
2
REDBREAST SUNFISH
176
95
FILLET
1RF,
(RM 59.0)
REDBREAST SUNFISH
174
90
REDBREAST SUNFISH
169
95
REDBREAST SUNFISH
177
95
REDBREAST SUNFISH
173
95
MEAN
174
94
19AUG00
REDBREAST SUNFISH
172
90
FILLET
2RF
REDBREAST SUNFISH
181
110
REDBREAST SUNFISH
164
85
REDBREAST SUNFISH
164
90
REDBREAST SUNFISH
179
95
MEAN
172
94
19AUG00
COMMON CARP
571
2500
FILLET
3RF
COMMON CARP
558
2360
COMMON CARP
505
1745
COMMON CARP
582
2880
COMMON CARP
545
2320
MEAN
552
2361
19AUG00
COMMON CARP
441
1240
WHOLE BODY
4WB
COMMON CARP
451
1195
COMMON CARP
469
1460
COMMON CARP
435
1155
COMMON CARP
459
1345
MEAN
451
1279
4-3

TOTAL
TOTAL
LENGTH
WHOLE BODY
DATE
STATION
SPECIES
(m)
WEIGHT(4)
SAMPLE TYPE
COMPOSITE
15AUGOO
3
REDBREAST SUNFISH
181
110
FILLET
1RF
ON 52.3)
REDBREAST SUNFISH
175
100
REDBREAST SUNFISH
175
100
REDBREAST SUNFISH
169
110
REDBREAST SUNFISH
180
110
MEAN
176
106
15AUGOO
REDBREAST SUNFISH
186
125
FILLET
2RF
REDBREAST SUNFISH
199
170
REDBREAST SUNFISH
190
130
REDBREAST SUNFISH
194
130
REDBREAST SUNFISH
187
120
MEAN
191
111
15AUGOO
COMMON CARP
543
2120
FILLET
3RF
COMMON CARP
537
1990
COMMON CARP
514
1810
COMMON CARP
569
2240
COMMON CARP
545
2135
MEAN
542
2059
15AUGOO
COMMON CARP
503
1670
WHOLE BODY
4WB
COMMON CARP
488
1470
COMMON CARP
451
1285
COMMON CARP
419
1110
COMMON CARP
459
1385
MEAN
464
1384
15-18AUGOO
4A
BLACK CRAPPIE
237
190
FILLET
1RF
(RM 41.5)
BLACK CRAPPIE
235.
180
BLACK CRAPPIE
212
135
BLACK CRAPPIE
237
190
BLACK CRAPPIE
241
180
MEAN
232
175
15-IBAUGOO
BLACK CRAPPIE
224
160
FILLET
2RF
BLACK CRAPPIE
220
160
BLACK CRAPPIE
241
205
BLACK CRAPPIE
226
175
BLACK CRAPPIE
222
160
MEAN
227
142
15-18AUGOO
CHANNEL CATFISH
435
810
FILLET
3RF
CHANNEL CATFISH
487
1160
CHANNEL CATFISH
476
930
CHANNEL CATFISH
446
870
CHANNEL CATFISH
448
800
MEAN
458
914
4-4

Table
4-2 (cont.)
TOTAL
TOTAL
LENGTH
WHOLE BODY
DATE
STATION
SPECIES
(mn)
WEIGHT
SAMPLE TYPE
COMPOSITE
15-IBAUG00
4A
COMMON CARP
559
2290
FILLET
4RF
(CONT.)
COMMON CARP
653
3920
COMMON CARP
576
2545
COMMON CARP
604
2535
MEAN
598
2823
15-18AUG00
COMMON CARP
667
4500
WHOLE BODY
5WB
COMMON CARP
583
2565
COMMON CARP
566
2420
COMMON CARP
538
2160
MEAN
589
2911
15-18AUG00
4B
BLACK CRAPPIE
225
189
FILLET
1RF
(RM 39.0)
BLACK CRAPPIE
214
150
BLACK CRAPPIE
231
165
BLACK CRAPPIE
217
155
BLACK CRAPPIE
213
155
MEAN
220
161
15-18AUG00
BLACK CRAPPIE
220
165
FILLET
2RF
BLACK CRAPPIE
230
190
BLACK CRAPPIE
223
185
BLACK CRAPPIE
220
180
BLACK CRAPPIE
225
190
MEAN
224
182
15-18AUG00
FLATHEAD CATFISH
436
915
FILLET
3RF
FLATHEAD CATFISH
407
775
FLATHEAD CATFISH
425
850
FLATHEAD CATFISH
450
950
FLATHEAD CATFISH
426
855
MEAN
429
869
15-18AUG00
COMMON CARP
671
5000
FILLET
4RF
COMMON CARP
712
6100
COMMON CARP
593
2870
COMMON CARP
683
5100
MEAN
665
4768
15-18AUG00
COMMON CARP
675
4800
WHOLE BODY
5WB
i,
COMMON CARP
656
4100
COMMON CARP
618
3170
COMMON CARP
634
3725
MEAN
646
3949
18/20AUG00
5
ROCK BASS
177
120
FILLET
IRF
(RM 19.3)
ROCK BASS
171
100
ROCK BASS
178
110
ROCK BASS
198
145
ROCK BASS
180
110
MEAN
181
117
4-5

Table 4-2
(cont.)
TOTAL
TOTAL
LENGTH
WHOLE EDDY
DATE STATION
SPECIES
(mm)
WEIGHT(q)
SAMPLE TYPE
COMPOSITE
18/20AUGOO
SMALLMOUTH BASS
209
135
FILLET
2RF
SMALLMOUTH BASS
238
185
SMALLMOUTH BASS
277
325
SMALLMOUTH BASS
315
450
SMALLMOUTH BASS
315
445
MEAN
271
308
18/20AUGOO
BLACK REDHORSE
447
995
FILLET
.3RF
BLACK REDHORSE
476
1360
BLACK REDHORSE
446
875
BLACK REDHORSE
443
1095
BLACK REDHORSE
427
835
MEAN
448
1032
18/20AUGOO
N. HOG SUCKER
324
405
WHOLE BODY
4WB
N. HOG SUCKER
383
790
N. HOG SUCKER
338
460
N. HOG SUCKER
294
310
N. HOG SUCKER
303
370
MEAN
328
467
4-6

net -hours. Total electrofishing duration (energized time) was 131, 202, 75, and 120 minutes
at Stations 1, 2, 3, and 5, respectively. Redbreast sunfish, rock bass, and/or largemouth bass
(the recommended target sport fish species) were used for at least one sport fish composite at
all stations, except at Waterville Lake Stations 4A and 4B (Table 4-2). Black crappie were
retained as an alternative sport fish species for both sport fish composites at Stations 4A and
4B. Smallmouth bass was used as an alternative sport fish species at Station 5 for 1 of the 2
sport fish composites. All specimens submitted for analysis appeared healthy and in good
condition. Lengths and weights for each fish making up each composite are provided in Table
4-2.
Common carp, the recommended target bottom feeder, were collected (and prepared for fillet
and whole body analysis) at Stations 2 through 4B. No common carp were observed at
Stations 1 or 5. Alternative bottom feeding species were collected from Stations 1 (black
redhorse fillets and northern hog sucker whole body composites) and 5 (black redhorse fillets
and northern hog sucker whole body composites) for analysis. The physiography of the
Waterville Lake Stations 4A and 4B necessitated the use of gill nets for the collection of
bottom feeding species. All nets were pulled and examined on a regular basis to reduce stress
or specimen mortality. All fish that were used for tissue analysis were in good condition.
Sport fish (fillet) samples consisted of one composite of five redbreast sunfish and one
composite of five rock bass at Station 1; two composites of five redbreast sunfish at Stations 2
and 3; two composites of five black crappie at Stations 4A and 4B; and one composite of five
rock bass and one composite of five smallmouth bass at Station 5 (Table 4-2). Bottom feeder
fillet composites consisted of five black redhorse at Station 1; five common carp at Stations 2
and 3; four common carp at Stations 4A and 4B; and five black redhorse at Station 5. In
addition, a second bottom feeder fillet composite, consisting of five channel catfish, was
prepared for analysis from Station 4A; and a second bottom feeder fillet composite, consisting
of five flathead catfish, was prepared for analysis from Station 4B. Bottom feeder whole body
composites included five northern hog sucker at Stations 1 and 5, five common carp at Stations
2 and 3, and four common carp at Station 4A and 4B (Table 4-2).
Twenty-five of 26 composites submitted for analysis in 2000 met the US EPA Region IV
recommendation (Cunningham 1990) that the smallest specimen in each composite be equal to
or greater than 75 percent of the total length of the largest specimen in that composite (Tables
4-2 and 6-4). In the smallmouth bass composite from Station 5, the smallest fish was 66
percent of the length of the largest fish.
4-7

5. SAMPLE PREPARATION
All fish tissue samples were prepared in accordance with U.S. EPA Region IV
recommendations (Cunningham 1990) as described in EA (1990). To prevent
cross -contamination between sampling stations, all sampling equipment likely to come into
contact with the fish was rinsed extensively with site water between stations.
Specimens collected at each station were sorted by size and species, and target species were
identified. The objective was to obtain four 5-fish composite samples at each station (plus a
catfish composite for each station in Waterville Lake) which met the species and size
objectives discussed in Section 3. From the target fishes collected, specimens of similar length
and weight were selected for each composite sample. All specimens retained were
immediately placed on ice for later processing. For each fish retained, length and weight data
were collected and recorded on the appropriate fisheries data sheet.
Following identification of target organisms, selection of composite samples, and collection of
length/weight data, each specimen was prepared for analysis and shipment. Sport fish and
bottom feeder fillet samples consisted of epaxial muscle tissue and skin from both sides of the
fish. Bottom feeder whole body samples consisted of the entire fish. Fillet samples were
prepared by removing the scales and then making an incision behind the opercula (on both
sides of the fish) from the base of the spine (behind the skull) to just below the pectoral fin.
Care was taken to cut through the epaxial muscle without puncturing the rib cage or gut lining.
A second incision was made along the length of the spine to the caudal fin on both sides of the
fish. The epaxial muscle was then gently cut away from the rib cage to obtain a fillet. In this
fashion, all flesh and skin was obtained from head to tail on both sides of the fish. Fillet
knives were solvent rinsed (hexane and acetone) between fish from different stations. Each
sample was wrapped in aluminum foil (dull side toward sample), labeled, and placed on dry
ice. Right side fillets were sent to Severn Trent Laboratory for analysis; left side fillets were
retained by Blue Ridge personnel as back-up fillets.
All individual specimens (fillets or whole bodies) composing a single composite sample were
placed together in a water -tight plastic bag labeled with the station name, sample number, and
the number of specimens in that composite. All labels contained the following information:
• sample identification number,
• sample location and station identification,
• sampling team initials,
• date of sample collection,
• species name,
• sample type (i.e., fillet or whole body)
• composite number (e.g., 1RF, 2RF, etc; see Table 4-2), and
5-1

A chain -of -custody form was filled out for each set of samples submitted for analysis. Each
form included composite -specific information and instructions. Copies of all chain -of -custody
records are provided in Appendix A.
All samples were frozen solid prior to shipment to the analytical laboratory. The frozen
samples were packed on dry ice, shipped via overnight delivery on 22 August and received at
Severn Trent Laboratory - Sacramento on 23 August 2000. All samples arrived in good
condition, still frozen (see chain -of -custody form in Appendix A).
5-2

6. ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The fish tissue samples were received at Severn Trent Laboratory (STL) - Sacramento,
California under chain -of -custody on 23 August 2000. Once received at the laboratory,
samples were compared to the chain -of -custody record to verify the contents of each shipping
container. Each individual fish or fillet within a composite was homogenized separately by
STL personnel, and equal aliquots of the homogenate from each fish were removed to
constitute the composite. Dioxin and furan analyses were performed using high resolution Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GS/MS) as required by the U.S. EPA. Laboratory
documentation of all chemical extractions and analyses are provided in Appendix B.
All chemical analyses of fish tissue samples were conducted using EPA Method 8290 (U.S.
EPA 1994) as specified in the Canton Mill NPDES permit condition.
The quality of the STL Laboratory analyses was assured through reproducible calibration and
testing of the extractions and GC/MS systems. A laboratory method blank was prepared along
with each batch of samples. The laboratory also used precision and recovery standards for the
determination of initial and ongoing precision and accuracy.
Laboratory reports for all 2000 Pigeon River fish tissue dioxin, furan, and lipid content
analyses are provided in Appendix B. Each laboratory analysis report form lists the
concentration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran
(TCDF)Iand all other CDD/CDF isomers. Results of the dioxin, furan, and lipid I content
analyses'are summarized in Table 6-1. Detection limits are reported parenthetically on a
sample -specific basis. Only fillet results are discussed below because the North Carolina
Division of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), formerly the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), considers only fillet results when issuing
health advisories.
Concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF were below the level of detection for all
sportfish composite samples from all locations (Table 6-1).
Concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in bottom feeder composite fillet samples were below the
level of detection at Stations 1, 2, 3, 4B (flathead catfish), and 5 (Table 6-1). Concentrations
of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in bottom feeder composite fillet samples from Stations 4A and 4B ranged
from 0.70 ppt (channel catfish at Station 4A) to 4.4 ppt (common carp at Station 4B). Furan
isomer (2,3,7,8-TCDF) analysis results indicated a concentration range from non -detect
[Stations 1, 2, 3, 4A (channel catfish), and 4B (flathead catfish)] to 4.2 ppt (common carp at
Station 4B) for bottom feeder fillets.
Examination of the data in Table 6-1 indicates that all fish collected during this study had body
burdens well below the FDA dioxin health advisory level (25 ppt) for fish tissue [as established
and presented in FDA (1981 and 1983) and Cordle (1983)].
rim

TABLE 6-1 SUW,4ARY OF PIGEON RIVER FISH TISSUE ANALYSIS RE-SULTS--2000
Station
Percent
Number
Sample ID
Species
Composite/Sample TyW
2.3,7.8-TCDDla1
2,3,7,8-TCDFlaI
Lipid
I
BRP-LOCI-SRBSF-IRF
Redbreast sunfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND(DL =0.48)
ND(DL =0.24)
1.9
BRP-LOCI-SRKBS-2RF
Rock bass
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.45)
ND (DL = 0.32)
3.3
BRP-LOCI-SBRH-3RF
Black redhorse
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.38)
ND (DL = 0.47)
6.4
BRP-LOCI-5NHS-4WB
Northern hog sucker
Comp. of 5 whole body samples
ND (DL = 0.37)
ND (DL = 0.49)
5.4
2
BRP-LOC2-5RBSF-1RF
Redbreast sunfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.31)
ND (DL = 0.27)
3.3
BRP-LOC2-5RBSF-2RF
Redbreast sunfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.43)
ND (DL = 0.27)
7.8
BRP-LOC2-5CARP-3RF
Common carp
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DI- = 0.42)
ND (DI, = 0.35)
11.0
BRP-LOC2-5CARP-4WB
Common call)
Comp. ol'S whole body samples
ND (DI- = 0.34)
1.2
5.5
3
BRP-LOC3-5RBSF-1 RF
Redbreast sunfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.43)
ND (DI. = 0.43)
4.2
BRP-LOC3-5RBSF-2RF
Redbreast sunfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.32)
ND (DL = 0.39)
2.2
BRP-LOC3-5CARP-3RF
Common carp
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.53)
ND (DL = 0.57)
5.5
BRP-LOC3-5CARP-4WB
Common carp
Comp. of 5 whole body samples
ND (DL = 0.67)
1.2
7.4
4A
BRP-LOC4A-5BCRP-I RF
Black crappie
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.29)
ND (DL = 0.34)
3.0
BRP-LOC4A-5BCRP-2RF
Black crappic
Comp, of 5 fillet samples
ND (DI. = 0.24)
ND (DI. = 0.32)
6.3
o+
BRP-LOC4A-5CCF-3RF
Channel catfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
0.70°"
ND (DL = 0.48)
8.5
ro
BRP-LOC4A-4CARP-4RF
Common carp
Comp. of 4 fillet samples
1.1
1.4
15.0
BRP-LOC4A-4CARP-5WB
Common carp
Comp. of whole body samples
1.7
2.4
18.0
4B
BRP-LOC4B-5BCRP-1 RF
Black crappic
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.41)
ND (DL = 0.40)
7.1
BRP-LOC4B-5BCRP-2RF
Black crappic
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.37)
ND (DL = 0.48)
7.8
BRP-LOC4B-5FHCF-3RF
Flathead catfish
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.42)
ND (DL = 0.27)
4.5
BRP-LOC4B-4CARP-4RF
Common carp
Comp. of 4 fillet samples
4.4
4.2
22.0
BRP-LOC4B-4CARP-5 WB
Common carp
Comp. of 4 whole body samples
13.0
3.9
26.0
5
BRP-L005-5RKBS-1 RF
Rock bass
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.45)
ND (DL = 0.50)
4.2
BRP-L005-5SMBS-2RF
Smallmoulh bass
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.31)
ND (DL = 0.23)
2.8
BRP-L005-5BKRH-3RF
Black redhorse
Comp. of 5 fillet samples
ND (DL = 0.35)
1.2
11.0
BRP-L005-5NHS-4WB
Northern hog sucker
Comp. of 5 whole body samples
ND (DL = 0.48)
0.89"'
15.0
(a) Units = ppt (parts per trillion) or pg/g (picogram per gram)
(b) Estimated result. Result is less than the reporting limit.
NOTE: ND = Non -Detectable; DL = Detection Limit

NCDENR has identified a dioxin evaluation level of 3 ppt in fillet samples, expressed as
average toxicity equivalent (TEQ) (NCDEM 1991). The TEQ of each chlorodibenzo dioxin
and furan (CDD/F) isomer is based on the toxicity equivalence factor (TEF) (U.S. EPA 1989
and Table 6-2) as indicated in Part 3, other requirements (paragraph H) of the Canton Mill's
permit and as described in the 1990 Study Plan (EA 1990). The TEQ value is calculated
assuming additivity of effects from the individual congeners of dioxins and furans and is
expressed as an "equivalent amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD" (NCDEM 1991). The measured
concentration of each CDD/F isomer, when multiplied by its appropriate TEF, yields the TEQ
of that isomer (the toxic concentration of that isomer relative to the toxicity of
2,3,7,8-TCDD). In cases where CDD/F concentrations were below the level of detection, a
value of one-half of the sample -specific detection limit was applied to the TEQ calculation.
The TEQ calculation and summarization schemes presented in Table 6-3 followed methods
used by NCDENR (NCDEM 1991). Sport fish fillet composites at all stations had TEQ values
well below the NCDENR evaluation level of 3.0 ppt. Bottom feeder fillet TEQ values were
also below the NCDENR limit for all stations, except 4B in Waterville Lake. The TEQ value
for the carp fillet composite at Station 4B exceeded the evaluation level. However, the TEQ
value for flathead catfish from the same location was well below the NCDENR evaluation
level of 3.0 ppt (Table 6-3).
Because dioxin and furan values for all sport fish fillet composites were below the level of
detection, TEQ values were calculated using one-half of the sample -specific detection limit.
Using this approach, TEQ concentrations in sport fish fillet samples ranged from 0.30 ppt at
Station 4A to 0.50 ppt at Stations 1 and 5 (Table 6-3).
Table 6-4 illustrates the consistent decline in 2,3,7,8 TCDD concentrations in carp fillet
samples from 1990 through 2000. Since 1990, 2,3,7,8 TCDD concentrations in carp fillets
declined significantly (87-98 percent) at all sampling stations (Table 6-4, Figure 6-1). The
concentrations of 2,3,7,8 TCDD in carp fillets from all stations in 2000 were similar to or
lower than concentrations observed in 1999. The concentration of 2,3,7,8 TCDD at Station
4B in 2000 was the lowest observed since 1996 and the second lowest observed since 1990
('fable 6-4, Figure 6-1).
6-3

TABLE 6-2 TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE FACTORS FOR CDD/F ISOMERS
DIOXIN
DIBENZOFURAN
Isomer(')
TEF()
Isomer(')
TEF()
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
1,2,3,4,7,8-1-IxCDD
0.04
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
1,2,3,7,8,9-1-IxCDD
0.04
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.01
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.01
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.001
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
(a) In each homologous group, the relative toxicity factor for the isomers not listed is 1/100 of
the value listed for the other isomers in that homologous group.
(b) TEF = toxic equivalence factor = relative toxicity assigned.
M,

D
ILn
Table 6-3. SUMMARY OF CDD/F ISOMER ANALYSES, TOXICITY EQUIVALENT FACTORS AND TOXICITY EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE 2000 PIGEON RIVER FISH
TISSUE COMPOSITES.
STATION
1
REDBREAST SUNFISH
- 1RF
ROCK BASS
- 2RF
BLACK REDHORS
-
3RF
N. H. SUCKER-
4WB
CDD/F ISOMERS
TEF
Results(a)
TEQ(b)
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Dibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0
0.48
` 0.240
0.45
` 0.225
0.38
`
0.190
0.37
`
0.185
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.54
* 0.135
0.74
` 0.185
0.57
`
0.143
0.53
`
0.133
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.48
' 0.010
0.58
* 0.012
0.50
'
0.010
0.53
*
0.011
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.39
* 0.008
0.47
' 0.009
0.41
0.008
0.44
-
0.009
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.04
0.40
` 0.008
0.47
* 0.009
0.41
*
0.008
0.44
*
0.009
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.001
0.31
` 0.000
0.41
* 0.000
0.26
*
0.000
0.35
0.000
Dibenzofuran
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.24
` 0.012
0.32
0.016
0.47
*
0.024
0.49
0.049
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.29
' 0.015
0.40
` 0.020
0.35
'
0.019
0.39
`
0.020
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.28
' 0.014
0.38
` 0.019
0.33
0.017
0.37
`
0.019
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.39
` 0.002
0.44
` 0.002
0.36
*
0.002
0.39
*
0.002
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.32
* 0.002
0.36
* 0.002
0.29
`
0.001
0.31
`
0.002
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.38
` 0.002
0.42
* 0.002
0.34
`
0.002
0.37
*
0.002
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.01
0.44
* 0.002
0.50
* 0.003
0.40
*
0.002
0.44
`
0.002
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
0.15
* 0.000
0.18
* 0.000
0.14
*
0.000
0.16
`
0.000
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
0.20
` 0.000
0.23
` 0.000
0.18
*
0.000
0.21
*
0.000
Total TEQ
0.45
0.50
0.42
0.44
(a) Units = ppt (parts per
trillion)
or pg/g picogram
per gram).
(b) Dioxin Toxic Equivalent
Concentration
using methodology from U.S.
EPA (1989).
(*) CDD/F isomer concentrations
were
below the level
of detection,
therefore a
value of 1/2
of the detection limit
was applied
to the TEQ calculation.
Note: 0.000 denotes values less
than
or equal to 0.0005.

REDBREAST SUNFISH
- 1RF
REDBREAST SUNFISH
- 2RF
COMON CARP
- 3RF
COMON CARP
- 461B
CDD/F ISOMERS
TEF
Results (a)
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Dibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0
0.31
+ 0.155
0.43
* 0.215
0.42
* 0.210
0.34
* 0.170
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.76
+ 0.190
0.66
+ 0.165
0.61
* 0.153
1.20
* 0.300
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.69
* 0.014
0.49
* 0.010
0.53
* 0.011
1.00
* 0.020
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.57
+ 0.011
0.40
* 0.008
2.50
0.100
3.00
0.120
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.04
0.57
* 0.011
0.41
* 0.008
0.59
* 0.012
0.69
* 0.014
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.001
1.10
* 0.001
0.61
* 0.000
14.00
0.014
14.00
0.014
Dibenzofuran
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.27 *
0.014
0.27
* 0.014
0.35
*
0.018
1.20
0.120
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.47 +
0.024
0.42
* 0.021
0.46
'
0.023
0.59
'
0.030
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.45 *
0.023
0.40
* 0.020
0.44
*
0.022
0.80
*
0.040
I
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.61 *
0.003
0.39
* 0.002
0.57
*
0.003
1.80
*
0.009
0'
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.49 *
0.002
0.31
* 0.002
0.46
*
0.002
1.20
*
0.006
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.59 *
0.003
0.37
* 0.002
0.55
*
0.003
0.50
*
0.003
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.01
0.69 *
0.003
0.44
* 0.002
0.64
*
0.003
0.58
*
0.003
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
0.26 *
0.000
0.19
* 0.000
0.65
*
0.000
1.60
*
0.001
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
0.33 *
0.000
0.24
* 0.000
0.26
*
0.000
0.29
*
0.000
Total TEQ
0.45
0.47
0.57
0.85
(a)
Units = ppt (parts per
trillion)
or pg/g picogram per gram).
(b)
Dioxin Toxic Equivalent
Concentration
using methodology from U.S.
EPA (1989).
(*)
CDD/F isomer concentrations
were
below the level of
detection,
therefore a value of 1/2 of
the detection limit was
applied
to the TEQ calculation.
Note:
0.000 denotes values less
than
or equal to 0.0005.

O%
V
Table 6-3 (cont
STATION 3
REDBREAST SUNFISH
- 1RF REDBREAST SUNFISH
- 2RF
COMMON CARP
-
3RF
COMMON CARP
- 4WB
CDD/F ISOMERS
TEF
Results (a)
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Dibenzodioxin
,
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0
0.43
+ 0.215
0.32
' 0.160
0.53
'
0.265
0.67
* 0.335
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.63
+ 0.158
0.46
+ 0.115
0.52
'
0.130
1.30
* 0.325
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
0.04
0.55
+ 0.011
0.38
+ 0.008
0.42
*
0.008
0.76
* 0.015
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.45
* 0.009
0.31
+ 0.006
0.95
*
0.019
2.00
0.040
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.04
0.46
+ 0.009
0.32
0.006
0.35
*
0.007
0.62
' 0.012
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.001
1.60
* 0.001
0.65
` 0.000
4.40
0.004
7.70
0.008
Dibenzofuran
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.43
* 0.022
0.39
* 0.020
0.57
*
0.029
1.20
0.120
1,2,3,7,8-2eCDF
0.1
0.31
0.016
0.28
' 0.014
0.32
0.016
0.54
' 0.027
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.30
+ 0.015
0.27
+ 0.014
0.44
0.022
0.52
' 0.026
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
0.01
0.43
* 0.002
0.29
* 0.001
0.31
*
0.002
0.62
' 0.003
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.35
* 0.002
0.23
* 0.001
0.25
*
0.001
0.50
* 0.003
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.41
* 0.002
0.28
+ 0.001
0.29
+
0.001
0.60
' 0-003
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.01
0.48
* 0.002
0.32
* 0.002
0.34
'
0.002
0.70
* 0.004
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
0.20
* 0.000
0.16
* 0.000
0.23
*
0.000
0.37
* 0.000
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
0.26
* 0.000
0.21
* 0.000
0.18
*
0.000
0.38
* 0.000
Total TEQ
0.46
0.35
0.51
0.92
(a) Units = ppt (parts per
trillion)
or pg/g picogram
per gram).
(b) Dioxin Toxic Equivalent
Concentration
using methodology from U.S.
EPA (1989).
(*) CDD/F isomer concentrations
were
below the level
of detection,
therefore a value
of 1/2
of the detection
limit
was applied
to the TEQ calculation.
Note: 0.000 denotes values less
than
or equal to 0.0005.

BLACK CRAPPIE
1RF
BLACK CRAPPIE
- 2RF
CHANNEL CAT.
- 3RF
COMMON CARP
- 4RF
COMMON CARP
- 5WB
CDD/F ISOMERS
TEF
Results (a)
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Dibenzodioxin
2,3,1,8-TCDD
1.0
0.29
• 0.145
0.24
• 0.120
0.70
0.700
1.10
1.100
1.70
1.700
1,2,3,7,E-PeCDD
0.5
0.54
• 0.135
0.45
• 0.113
0.71
0.178
1.70
• 0.425
1.50
• 0.375
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.52
• 0.010
0.40
• 0.008
0.43
• 0.009
1.40
• 0.020
1.10
• 0.022
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.43
• 0.009
0.33
• 0.007
1.80
• 0.036
5.70
0.220
7.10
0.284
1,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDD
0.04
0.43
• 0.009
0.33
• 0.007
0.35
' 0.007
0.97
' 0.019
1.50
• 0.030
1,2,3,4,6,7,E-HpCDD
0.001
0.36
' 0.000
0.69
• 0.000
1.80
0.001
19.00
0.019
36.00
0.036
Dibenzo£uran
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.34
' 0.017
0.32
. 0.016
0.48
' 0.024
1.40
0.140
2.40
0.240
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.34
• 0.017
0.27
• 0.014
0.29
' 0.015
1.10
• 0.055
1.50
• 0.075
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.33
' 0.017
0.27
• 0.014
0.37
• 0.019
1.50
• 0.075
2.00
• 0.100
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
0.01
0.37
• 0.002
0.27
' 0.001
0.42
• 0.002
1.10
• 0.006
1.10
' 0.006
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.30
" 0.002
0.22
* 0.001
0.34
` 0.002
1.40
* 0.007
3.50
• 0.018
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.36
• 0.002
0.26
• 0.001
0.41
' 0.002
0.55
• 0.003
0.83
• 0.004
1,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDF
0.01
0.42
0.002
0.30
• 0.002
0.47
' 0.002
0.64
• 0.003
0.38
• 0.002
a, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
0.17
• 0.000
0.13
` 0.000
0.33
0.000
1.70
' 0.001
3.20
0.003
) 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
0.21
* 0.000
0.17
• 0.000
0.06
• 0.000
0.48
• 0.000
0.72
• 0.000
OD
Total TEQ
0.37
0.30
1.00
2.11
2.B9
(a) Units - ppt (parts per trillion) or pg/g picogram per gram).
(b) Dioxin Toxic Equivalent Concentration using methodology from U.S. EPA (1989).
(•) CDD/F isomer concentrations were below the level of detection, therefore a value of 112 of the detection limit was applied
to the TEQ calculation.
Note: 0.000 denotes values less than or equal to 0.0005.

STATION 4B
BLACK CRAPPIE
- 1RF
BLACK CRAPPIE
- 2RF
FLATHEAD CAT.
- 3RF
COMMON CARP
- 4RF
COMMON CARP
- 5WB
CDD/F ISOMERS
TEF
Results (a)
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Dibenzodioxin
.. ... .
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0
0.41
• 0.205
0.37
• 0.185
0.42
0.210
4.40
4.400
13.00
13.000
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.69
• 0.173
0.52
' 0.130
0.52
0.130
2.00
• 0.500
3.00
1.500
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.55
• 0.011
0.50
• 0.010
0.44
0.009
2.20
• 0.044
1.80
• 0.036
1,2,3,6,1,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.45
• 0.009
0.41
• 0.006
0.40
0.008
B.BO
0.352
0.00
0.320
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.04
0.45
• 0.009
0.41
• 0.008
0.36
0.007
1.20
• 0.024
1.30
• 0.026
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.001
1.10
• 0.001
0.94
' 0.000
0.90
• 0.000
32.00
0.032
23.00
0.023
DSbeozoEuxan
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.40
• 0.020
0.48
• 0.024
0.27
• 0.014
4.20
0.420
3.90
0.390
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.38
• 0.019
0.34
• 0.011
0.32
• D.016
1.90
` 0.095
1.40
• 0.070
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.37
• 0.019
0.33
• 0.017
0.31
• 0.016
2.80
0.280
5.10
0.510
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.44
• 0.002
0.37
• 0.002
0.33
* 0.002
1.90
• 0.010
1.10
• 0.006
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.35
• 0.002
0.30
• 0,002
0.26
• 0.001
2.70
' 0.014
2.00
• 0.010
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.42
• 0.002
0.36
• 0.002
0.31
• 0.002
0.53
• 0,003
0.75
• 0.004
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.01
0.49
• 0.002
0.42
• 0.002
0.36
• 0.002
0.59
• 0.003
0.52
• 0.003
p• 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
0.18
• 0.000
0.17
• 0.000
0.19
• 0.000
2.30
• 0.001
1.70
• 0.001
I 1,2,3,4,1,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
0.23
• 0.000
0.22
• 0.000
0.24
0.000
0.76
• 0.000
0.42
• 0.000
Total TEQ
0.47
0.41
0.42
6.1B
15.90
(a) Units - ppt (parts per trillion) or pg/g picogram per gram).
(b) Dioxin Toxic Equivalent Concentration using methodology from V.S. EPA (1989).
(•) CDD/F isomer concentrations were below the level of detection, therefore a value of 1/2 of the detection limit was applied
to the TEQ calculation.
Note: 0.000 denotes values less than or equal to 0.0005.

Table 6-3 (cont.
STATION 5
ROCK
BASS
- 1RF
SMALLMOUTH BASS
- 2RF
BLACK REDHORS
- 3RF
N. HOG SUCKE
- 4WB
CDD/F ISOMERS
TEF
Results (a)
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Results
TEQ
Dibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0
0.45
' 0.225
0.31
' 0.155
0.35
+ 0.175
0.48
* 0.240
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.5
0.68
' 0.170
0.49
+ 0.123
0.57
* 0.143
0.66
+ 0.165
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.58
+ 0.012
0.46
' 0.009
0.42
+ 0.008
0.61
+ 0.012
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
0.04
0.47
* 0.009
0.37
+ 0.007
0.35
* 0.007
0.50
+ 0.010
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
0.04
0.47
+ 0.009
0.38
+ 0.008
0.35
* 0.007
0.51
+ 0.010
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
0.001
0.37
* 0.000
0.56
+ 0.000
0.44
+ 0.000
0.48
+ 0.000
Dibenzofuran
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.1
0.50
* 0.025
0.23
+ 0.012
1.20
0.120
0.89
0.089
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.40
+ 0.020
0.32
* 0.016
0.33
*
0.017
0.43
*
0.022
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
0.1
0.30
' 0.019
0.31
+ 0.016
0.32
*
0.016
0.41
*
0.021
o.
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.40
* 0.002
0.35
* 0.002
0.34
'
0.002
0.48
+
0.002
F,
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.32
* 0.002
0.29
* 0.001
0.28
*
0.001
0.39
*
0.002
0
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
0.01
0.38
* 0.002
0.34
* 0.002
0.33
*
0.002
0.46
'
0.002
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
0.01
0.44
* 0.002
0.40
* 0.002
0.30
*
0.002
0.54
*
0.003
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
0.001
0.17
0.000
0.13
* 0.000
0.14
0.000
0.20
*
0.000
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.001
0.22
* 0.000
0.16
* 0.000
0.1B
*
0.000
0.25
*
0.000
Total TEQ
0.50
0.35
0.50
0.58
(a)
Units = ppt (parts per
trillion)
or pg/g picogram
per gram).
(b)
Dioxin Toxic Equivalent
Concentration
using
methodology from U.S.
EPA (1989).
(*)
CDD/F isomer concentrations
were
below the
level of detection,
therefore a value of 1/2 of
the detection limit was
applied
to the TEQ calculation.
Note:
0.000 denotes values less
than
or equal to
0.0005.

Table 6-4. BLUE RIDGE PAPER CANTON MILL FISH FILLET TISSUE ANALYSIS RESULTS, 1990-2000(a)
1990 Resul6snr
1991 Resultsa)
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDDt4
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (man)
2,3,7,8-TCDD°'
1
Rock bass
5
151-197
ND (0.15)
1
Rock bass
10
151-190
ND (0.40)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
5
153-213
ND (0.15)
RM 64.5
Redbreast sunfish
10
106-178
ND (0.33)
Black redhorse
2
380-383
ND (0.20)
Black redhorse
5
358-471
ND (0.35)
2
Redbreast sunfish
5
185-196
1.4
2
Redbreast sunfish
8
154-189
0.87
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
5
148-201
3.4
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
8
154-202
0.93
Common carp
1
517
19.7
Common carp
10
491-570
9.7
3
Redbreast sunfish
5
I88-203
0.79
3
Redbreast sunfish
10
176-209
ND (0.89)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
5
191-198
2.6
RM 52.3
Bluegill
6
164-197
ND (0.83)
Common carp
2
489-555
4.2
Common carp
10
408-463
2.4
4A
Bluegill
5
178-192
ND (1.2)
4A
Largemoudr bass
7
313-468
3.0
RM 41.5
Bluegill
5
153-174
ND (0.63)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
10
173-216
ND (0.63)
Common carp
1
574
27
Common carp
10
502-688
23
4B
Bluegill
5
183-196
0.76
4B
Bluegill
5
I86-212
ND (0.34)
RM 39.0
Largemouth bass
2
279400
ND (1.8)
RM 39.0
Bluegill
5
190-208
ND (0.62)
Common carp
4
551-638
66
Common carp
10
532-605
40
5
Redbreast sunfish
t0
143-223
0.98
RM 16.5
Spotted bass
2
266-368
ND (0.35)
Common carp
2
511-539
1.7
Total Fish Filleted
57
138
(a) Survey conducted by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology. Analyses conducted by ENSECO Laboratories I990-1994, Quanterra laboratories 1995 - 1999, Sevem Trent Laboratories
in 2000.
(b) Survey conducted in August.
(c) Survey conducted in August and September.
O Units = ppt (parts per trillion) or pg1g (picogmm per gram)
ND = Non -delectable at the detection limit in parentheses.

Table 6-4 (cons.) BLUE RIDGE PAPER CANTON MILL FISH FILLET TISSUE ANALYSIS RESULTS
1992 Results(")
1993 Resultsol
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDD(a
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDD(D
1
Rock bass
10
147-194
ND (0.085)
1
Rock bass
10
185-208
ND (0.10)
RM 64.5
Redbreast sunfish
10
147-182
ND (0.075
RM 64.5
Redbreast sunfish
5
148-203
ND (0.12)
Black redhorse
6
365-441
1.4
Black redhorse
10
365-410
ND (0.80)
2
Redbreast sunfish
10
180-220
0.72
2
Redbreast sunfish
10
168-206
ND (0.27)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
10
178-220
ND (0.38)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
10
140-191
ND (0.15)
Common carp
10
486-581
9.3
Common carp
10
462-620
3.1
3
Redbreast sunfish
10
175-200
ND (0.34)
3
Redbreast sunfish
10
155-210
ND (0.27)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
10
183-200
ND (0.29)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
7
180-213
ND (0.36)
Common carp
10
438-600
4
Common carp
10
440-576
3.4
4A
Black crappie
10
153-232
ND (0.094)
4A
Black crappie
10
178-201
ND (0.15)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
10
177-224
ND (0.10)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
10
182-204
ND (0.089)
Common carp
10
492-622
29
Common carp
10
525-611
19
4B
Bluegill
10
182-212
ND (0.23)
4B
Largemouth bass
10
190-310
ND (0.12)
RM 39.0
Largemouth bass
5
215-332
ND (0.19)
RM 39.0
Bluegill
10
185-210
ND (0.20)
Common carp
10
558-640
51
Common carp
10
530-644
28
5
Redbreast sunfish
10
175-245
ND (0.38)
5
Redbreast sunfish
6
I80-231
ND (0.17)
RM 19.0
Spotted bass
2
256-355
ND (0.30)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
9
212-281
ND (0.13)
Smallmouth buffalo
5
428-510
0.61
Smallmouth buffalo
5
450-550
ND 0.41
Total Fish Filleted
158
162

I
Table 6-4 (cont.) BLUE RIDGE PAPER CANTON MILL FISH FILLET TISSUE ANALYSIS RESULTS
2000 Results'°'
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDDO
1
Redbreast sunfish
5
137-148
ND (0.48)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
5
162-186
ND (0.45)
Black redhorse
5
357-396
ND (0.38)
2
Redbreast sunfish
5
169-176
ND (0.31)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
5
164-181
ND (0.43)
Common carp
5
505-582
ND (0.42)
3
Redbreast sunfish
5
169-181
ND (0.43)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
5
186-199
ND (0.32)
Common carp
5
514-569
ND (0.53)
4A
Black crappie
5
212-241
ND (0.29)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
5
220-241
ND (0.24)
Common carp
4
559-604
1.1
Channel catfish
5
435497
ND (0.70)
4B
Black crappie
5
213-231
ND (0.41)
RM 39.0
Black crappie
5
220-230
ND (0.37)
Common carp
4
593-712
4.4
Flathead catfish
5
407450
ND (0.42)
5
Rock bass
5
171-198
ND (0.45)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
5
209-238
ND (0.31)
Black redhorse
5
427476
ND 0.35
Total Fish Filleted
98

rn
t
Table 6-4 (cons.) BLUE RIDGE PAPER CANTON MILL FISH FILLET TISSUE ANALYSIS RESULTS
1999 Rnsnitsot
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDDes
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDD"
1
Redbreast sunfish
5
145-176
ND (OA9)
1
Redbreast sunfish
5
141-177
ND (0.21)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
5
158-179
ND (0.29)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
5
164-I80
ND (0.37)
Black redhorse
5
340-396
ND (0.18)
Black redhorse
5
352-427
ND (0.33)
2
Redbreast sunfish
5
164-177
ND (0.20)
2
Redbreast sunfish
5
167-190
ND (0.37)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
5
166-193
ND (0.28)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
5
158-178
ND (0.29)
Common carp
5
551-661
1.3
Common carp
5
544-615
ND (0.27)
3
Redbreast sunfish
5
169-193
ND (0.34)
3
Redbreast sunfish
5
169-189
ND (0.36)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
5
167-200
ND (0.22)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
5
162-176
ND (0.37)
Common carp
5
449-550
ND (0.38)
Common carp
5
500-591
0.57
4A
Black crappie
5
220-240
ND (0.49)
4A
Black crappie
5
220-268
ND (0.18)
RM 41.5
Largemouth bass
5
227-330
ND (0.15)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
5
219-244
ND (0.08)
Common carp
5
585-621
1.6
Common carp
5
574-645
0.58
Charnel catfish
5
416-458
ND (0.28)
Channel catfish
5
425482
0.83
4B
Black crappie
5
233-252
ND (0.15)
4B
Black crappie
5
233-244
ND (0.27)
RM 39.0
Largemouth bass
5
259-330
ND (0.17)
RM 39.0
Largemouth bass
5
276-305
ND (0.32)
Common carp
5
563-686
9.1
Common carp
5
621-680
4.7
Flathead catfish
5
414-523
ND (0.20)
Flathead catfish
5
372-513
ND (0.46)
5
Rock bass
4
155-190
ND (0.It)
5
Rock bass
5
170-203
ND (0.29)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
5
295-365
ND (0.21)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
5
297430
ND (0. 19)
Smallmouth buffalo
5
464-537
ND 0.31
Smallmouth buffalo
5
476-565
ND 0.31
Total Fish Filleted
99
1
Total Fish Filleted
100

FIGURE 6-1. TCDD CONCENTRATIONS IN CARP FILLETS COLLECTED FROM
THE PIGEON RIVER, 1990-2000 (Stations 2 and 3).
YEAR
Station "2-----I----- Station 3

a
'•7
I

Table 6-4 (cons.) BLUE RIDGE PAPER CANTON MILL FISH FILLET TISSUE ANALYSIS RESULTS
1996 Resultsot
1099 R-..HdN
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDDta
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDDr0
I
Redbreast sunfish
5
154-185
ND (0.13)
1
Redbreast sunfish
5
144-161
ND (0.11)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
5
160-208
ND (0.085)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
5
162-194
ND (0.23)
Black redhorse
5
401-440
ND (0.089)
Black redhorse
4
291-424
ND (0.22)
2
Redbreast sunfish
5
179-187
ND (0.10)
2
Redbreast sunfish
5
183-200
ND (0.26)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
5
183-191
ND (0. 12)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
5
'160-181
ND (0. 12)
Common carp
5
543-580
1.5
Common carp
5
506-615
1.4
3
Redbreast sunfish
5
184-I90
ND (0. 13)
3
Redbreast sunfish
5
187-202
ND (0.18)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
5
165-I85
ND (0.13)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
5
164-195
ND (0.18)
Common carp
5
516-630
0.87
Common carp
5
450-505
ND (0.33)
4A
Black crappie
5
216-233
ND (0.15)
4A
Black crapppie
5
215-231
ND (0.27)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
5
215-229
ND (0.18)
RM 41.5
Black crappie
5
220-230
ND (0.10)
Common carp
5
562-632
4.2
Common carp
5
570-655
2.3
Channel catfish
5
418-482
2.0
4B
Black crappie
5
223-258
ND (0.11)
4B
Black crappie
5
226-241
ND (0. 17)
RM 39.0
Largemouth bass
5
278-310
ND (0.13)
RM 39.0
Largemouth bass
5
270-360
ND (0.2I)
Common carp
5
470-623
4.0
Common carp
5
605-690
11.0
Flathead catfish
5
430-540
0.62
5
Rock bass
4
169-186
ND (0.077)
5
Rock bass
5
143-214
ND (0. 15)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
5
315-454
ND (0.12)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
5
278-367
ND (0.27)
Smallmouth buffalo
5
451-555
ND 0.12
Smallmouth buffalo
5
406-525
ND 0.22
Total Fish Filleted
89
Total Fish Filleted
99

Table 6-4 (cont.) BLUE RIDGE PAPER CANTON MILL FISH FILLET TISSUE ANALYSIS RESULTS
1994 Resullsrol
1995 Resullstct
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDD(s
Station
Species
Number of
Fish
Length
Range (mm)
2,3,7,8-TCDDra
1
Rock bass
6
156-185
ND (0.083)
1
Rock bass
10
162-205
ND (0.10)
RM 64.5
Redbreast sunfish
10
155-197
ND (0.10)
RM 64.5
Rock bass
10
150-220
ND (0.26)
Black redhorse
3
367435
ND (0.096)
Black rcdhorse
7
375-464
ND (0.21)
2
Redbreast sunfish
10
176-206
ND (0.073)
2
Redbreast sunfish
10
152-194
ND (0.20)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
10
160-210
ND (0.092)
RM 59.0
Redbreast sunfish
10
161-188
ND (0.16)
Common carp
10
490-590
0.99
Comon carp
10
435-664
1.7
3
Redbreast sunfish
10
149-196
ND (0. 15)
3
Redbreast sunfish
10
170-206
ND (0.18)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
10
158-210
ND (0.074)
RM 52.3
Redbreast sunfish
10
154-202
ND (0.20)
Common carp
10
456-565
0.74
Common carp
10
391-571
1.2
4A
Black crappie
10
203-231
ND (0.085)
4A
Largemou0r bass
5
291-439
2.0
RM 41.5
Bluegill
10
185-205
ND (0.084)
RM 41.5
Bluegill
10
167-199
ND (0.26)
Common carp
10
465-591
3.4
Common carp
10
520-615
5.8
4B
Black crappie
10
200-215
ND (0.084)
4B
Largemouth bass
9
248-391
0.68
RM 39.0
Black crappie
10
195-220
ND (0.062)
RM 39.0
Bluegill
8
158-216
ND (0.34)
Common carp
10
520-635
6.6
Common carp
4
532-626
11.0
5
Redbreast sunfish
6
129-289
ND (0.075)
5
Smallmouth bass
9
280-423
ND (0.11)
RM 19.0
Smallmouth bass
9
234442
ND (0.11)
RM 19.0
Redbreast sunfish
7
163-192
ND (0. 15)
Smallmouth buffalo
9
440-520
ND 0.089
Black redhorse
7
440481
ND 0.45
Total Fish Filleted
163
156

7. REFERENCES
Cordle, F. 1983. Use of epidemiology in the regulation of dioxins in the food supply, in
Accidental Exposure to Dioxins: Human Health Aspects (F. Coulston and F. Pocchiara,
eds.), pp 245-256. Academic Press, New York.
Cunningham, W.R. 1990. Letter.to Paul Wiegand. 30 January.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1990. Study Plan for the Monitoring of
Dioxin in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 11370.01, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1991. Results of 1990 Dioxin Monitoring in
Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 11370.02, prepared for Champion International Corporation,
Canton, North Carolina.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1992. Results of 1991 Dioxin Monitoring in
Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 11370.03, prepared for Champion International Corporation,
Canton, North Carolina.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1993a. Results of 1992 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 11370.05, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. April.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1993b. Results of 1993 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 11370.06, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. December.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1994. Results of 1994 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 11370.07, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. December.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1995. Results of 1995 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 13043.01, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. December.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1996. Results of 1996 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 13176.01, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. December.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1997. Results of 1997 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 13353.01, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. November.
7-1

EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 1998. Results of 1998 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 13478.01, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. December. '
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. 2000. Results of 1999 Dioxin Monitoring
in Fish Tissue. EA Report No. 13478.01, prepared for Champion International
Corporation, Canton, North Carolina. January.
Food and Drug Administration. 1981. FDA advises Great Lake States to monitor
dioxin -contaminated fish. FDA Talk Paper dated 28 August, in Food Drug Cosmetic Law
Reports, paragraph 41, 321. Commerce Clearing House, Inc. 8 September.
Food and Drug Administration. 1983. Statement by Stanford A. Miller, Director, Bureau of
Foods, FDA before the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and
Environment, U.S. House of Representatives. 30 June.
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM). 1991. Fish Tissue
Dioxin Levels in North Carolina: 1990 Update. NCDEM Water Quality Section.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1994. Analytical Procedures and
Quality Assurance for Multimedia Analysis of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-para-dioxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans by High -Resolution Gas Chromatography/High-Resolution
Mass Spectrometry (Method 8290).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1989. Interim Procedures for
Estimating Risk Associated with Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins
and Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update Report No. EPA/625/3-89/016,
U.S. EPA, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, D.C.
Versar, Inc. 1984. Sampling Guidance Manual for the National Dioxin Study. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Contract 68-01-6160. Work Order Number 8.7.
Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Monitoring and Data Support Division,
Washington, D.C. Final draft. July.
7-2

G � 013Kw.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS

,Chain of Custody.
Record.
QUAd124 1�'` "
fAwanterra
Environmental
Services
CLenL' r ,
Pmjecf Manage
Date
Chain Of Custody Number
.:
�- v
70323
eZ Sri
Telephone Number (Area Cade)/Fax Number (�' D F \
Lab Number
11
Page
-
of
State
Zip Code
Site Contact
Lab Contact
Analysis
(Attach
list
if
A)C
r�)i'`�
mores
ace
is needed
'=�'
/
/< <•' / 1 L/�
Prged Neme'
CarriedWaybill Number '
U
'
Q
Special Instructions/
Conditions of Receipt
'va tMase OrdenlQuate No..
1w
Matrix
Containers &
Preservatives
�
`
s
;.Sample I.D. No. and Description
Date
Time
e
y
(Co me/ nam tar each sample may be combined on one line)
- wl3
- 9-vv
fi
r y'
y q' r
i h t
i k..
a/
3' 1.
Possible Hazardldenfificebon
Sample Disposal
-
❑Non -Hazard ❑Flammable ❑Skin Inifant ❑ Poison B ❑Unknown
(A fee may be assessed it samples are retained
❑ Return To Client ❑ Disposal By Lab ❑ Archive For Months longer than 3 months
Tu_m Anwrq Time Rsqumd _ uD Regtarements /bpeuryl
1 ❑ 24 Hours El48 Hours ❑ 70ays ❑ 14 Days 21 Days ❑ Other
L Relirq��u++ished ay., , p Date Time 1. Received
%By�/• o Time
11" 27. uo 6' $�'_ �%�.�/� S.
2. Re4rpuished By - - Date Time 2. Received By I Dale V Time
F: DISTRIBUTION., -WHITE - Stays with the Sample; CANARY - Returned to Client with Report; PINK - Field Copy ,

�Chain,of Custody t „. 1,1 ,,y( Quanferra
wRecord Environmental
ra;;• _ .' ,;,.. services
4'.'OUA4124-1 ,
, Grenl' $.-• '
/ , °fir
Pmiect Manager
S
Dale
�. _c/
Chain Or Custody Number
70840
r .; T 1'.' ", ",••
Atldieas +. " '
Telep one Number (Area CodeyP x Number
t/ C%
Lab Number
Z.
��
Page of
Gty - ... •,��
4
Slate
Zip Code
site Confacl
Lab Contact
Analysis
(Attach
list
if
mores
ace
is needed
..
4 Project Name '
; 7
CanierM'aybill Number
, j` C/Z, ,.k
Special Instructions/
Conditions of Receipt
•'gcpnfty m ase omedouore No. - . /
Matrix
Containers &
Preservatives
Sample I.D. No. and Description
w y�
n $ i = ¢�
(Conlaimus for Semple may be combined on one line)
It (� ' ) = LC
*,1ataT,,me;
a L F
I
4 s
Y
1f -
�Pbsvble Narem rden6fication - • .,
y -
'ti❑Non-Hazard ' ❑Flammable ❑ Skin Irritant ❑ Poison B ❑ Unknown
Sample Disposal ,
❑ Disposal (A lee may be assessed it samples are retained
❑ Retam To Client posal By Lab ❑ Archive For Months longer than 3 months
1' f
'L
uml,Tme Requi1d
lours ❑ 48 Hours ❑ 7 Days ❑ 14 Days ❑ 21 Days ❑ Other
uishedBy - - Date Tme.
,uishad By _ Data
Time
wished By (Dale Time
IN ... We. ..,.:: •:kf1
tIBUTION: WHITE - Stays with the Sample; CANARY- Returned to Client with Report; F
—.... ...... a,.aYvu,rr.
Field Copy
r 'k.
J �� �Tmme,. I i
Tme
w

Chain,of Custody a v"Auan erra rt
Record Environmental
services
x'OUAd1244•' C,
Gienl
Project Manager
Dale
Chain Of Custody Number '
70 821
yACtl yss _ - -
Telephone rob r (Are. Cotl lie. Number \
Lab Number
S
ea¢�`Y-"T>"i�� LF-� ��
Page o/__L_1
Q( n �
';City t-- .• ; ,:�',
stale
Zip Code
Site Contact
Lab Contact
Analysis
(Attach
list
it
/
?- /, t l
mores
ace
is needed
CamenWaybill Number
Special Instructions/ -
Conditions of Receipt
Conbacf/P rMesa Orderrouole No.
&
' -
Matrix
Preservatives
Preservatives
\
v
?';.Sample D. No. and Description
'Date
$
d
�
ti
e
a.r.•;3
(Conrafnars for each sample may be combined on one line)
Time
o
h
y
j
i
=
a:
m
c m
`�
/? r RUC - -� F
fir- -00
�o
r
A _ -ayQrrc
� ao-oo
(slsJn/�`'s \
P
i
l
-
�; Posv'ble Hmard Idemliicabor,
Sample Disposal
❑ Non-Hazard❑Flammable ❑Skin Irritant ❑ Poison B ❑Unknown
(A lee may be assessed it samples are retained
❑Return To Client Disposal By Lab ❑Archive For Months lon er than 3 months
rum nmurro rune Hegww ,- wnegmemems lopecnp
-'i ❑ 24 Hours • ❑ 48 Hours ❑ 7 Days ❑ !4 Days 21 Days ElOther
1 Relirrqukhetl By „ - Date I Time 1. Received By oa,9t Time
2. ReGrpuisbedBy , I Dale Time . flecelvetl By / I Date Time
u. 77
uw or 1 .. I V �e I, "e lu .,e.e•.e .,y ,. .o I......
;•Comments .
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE- Stays with the Sample; CANARY- Returned to Client with Report; PINK- Field Copy

Chain,of Custody
2"Puanterra
Environmental
' Services _
pCfient f,t _
Project Manager
Date
Chain Of Custody Number
70822.
rAddmss'
Telephone Numbs, (Ares Code)/Fax Number . `
Lob Number
ry`;r
J
C ��
Page of
Qty /7
slate'
zip Code
Site Contact
Lab Conrad
Analysis
(Attach
list
it
C a n1 I N'
/VC
a 9- 1 6
C/t
r� C, (
mores
ace
is needed
,
Name
�
}}
Y
SPioJed
f .
Cameelyayblll Number
,
SI
f- 1 i i
b
n
`
Special Instructions/
Conditions of Receipt
uadPu se OmeNOuofe No.
Containers &
Matrix
preservatives
C
�
•
' Ut a.: - Sample I.D. No. and Description
Date
Time
(Containers for each sweets may be combined on one line)
T
J
=
2
2
-
1 uo
a5
t a
r�
Posvble HazaN ICentilxafion ;, .
Sample Disposal
❑ Non-Hezeni -� ❑Flammable ❑Skin irritant ❑ Poison B ❑Unknown
(A lee maybe assessed if samples are retained
❑ Return To Client El Disposal By Lab El Archive For Months longer than 3 months) '
Y _ 1-1- ,}� I OC Re4ulremews (Specay)
Hours 7Days ❑ 14 Days IXl 21 Days ❑ Other
Y ! _
wsberf Bg," .y I Date Time
uishadsy - I Date I Time
DISTRIBUTION. WHITE -Stays with the Sample; CANARY- Returned to Client with Report; PINK- Field Copy

fl
VhainFof,,Cqstody
:Wecord","
IQUA412411'
Q001banterra
Environmental
Services
Cb
Project Manager
&
Dole
. _,7. dd
Chain Of Custody Number
70824
6� 0
.A rosy.
Telephone Number (Area UOUO)IFOX Number
Lab Number
Wald'
Page of
ClyfY
Cods
Site Contact
Lab C
Analysts
(Atta
h list
if
;U
C-
I
�C
more
sDace
is needed)
IQ
Fq 7t;j
"I
" F,<, 41Z
'PrOdName
Carder/Waybill Number
Special Instructions/
Conditions of Receipt
'can traWleurrMse OrdedDuale No.
Containers &
Matrix
Preservatives
Sample D. No. and Description
Date
Time
8
Z3
sample maybe combined on one line)
I
I
Ixi
ly
I
"YA q R'r
P-19-00
R04
5F&)
- ,a R r
'PossibleHa;oullmidentirr Uon
,E]' . , 11 ED Polson B [0] own
Non -Hazard Flammable ❑ Skin irritant
gamble Disposal
(A fee maybe assessed itsarnples are retained
El Return To Client El Disposal By Lab ❑Awhile For Months longer than 3 months)
me Required UU Hqw
0 46 Hours El 7 Day, 0 N Days 21 Days 1:1 Other
FEY.. Vale Time
LR
a
Data I Ture, 2. Recon,
coau*8n11
• DISTRIBUT.10N., WHITE- Stays with the Sample; CANARY- Returned to Client with Report; PINK- Field Copy
2

jChqin,,,OfCU,StOdy
VRecorqi,',,
Qobuanterra
' Environmental
�f Services
Project Manager
Date
Chain Of Custody Number
70826
Telephone Number (Area -lade)rumber
FaK
Lab Number
Ycf
6 7 D
Page of ---
State
Zp Code
Site Contact
Contact
Lab Cc
Analysis
Attach
list
if
A/(
more
space
is needed)
CamerlWaybill Number'
Special Instructional'
Conditions of Race P! 1
carlmdmu se orderlQuote NO.
Matrix
Containers &
Preservatives
ample No. and Description Date Time
se
(Contain sample may be combined on one line)
II
A
1V1
I
I
I
1
1
14 ttlk
FF
S,1,1
�7r
P Yo
Sample Disposal
Non -Hazard ❑ Flammable ElSkin irritant El Pelson 13 0 unknown
(A fee may be assessed if samples are retained
0 Return To Client E1Disposal By Lab 0 Archive For Martha longer than 3 months)
QO Requirements (Specify)
:1 2,4 Hours El 4q_ 1:17 Day,'
El 14 Days 21 Days OOther
Date
Tano
1. R
7WY
D
me lu
I1.-qefin
at,
2. Rolinquishetl By
Veto
2. Received By
Dal.
Time
I
177m.
I
R!,
Date
Turn,
J. Received By
Dole
V.OVBy,
I
177M9
Comments i
I
DISTRIBUTION:- WHITE- Stays with the Sample; CANARY- Returned to Client with Report; PINK -Fleld Copy
f

IA
,Chain/ofhCustody
Recur 4
t r.' ,
,
jIV A-4124-i","- -
iivanterra
Environmental
Services
client
Project Manager
Date
Chain Of Custody Number -
.;
�-
-rz o
70837
Addre
Telephone Nu er (Area Co o)/ ax N mbar
\.
Lab Number
7
6s6-67.L4!�
Page
of
Crly
State
Zip Code
Site Contact
Lab Contact
Analysis
(Attach
list
i/
,r
qa' ,•N
mores
ace
is needed
..
C.
F
�Pmj gName - -
CamerMaybill Number
U
Special Instructions/
Conditions dl Receipt
P
Cunha rchese oraerrouote No..
' Matrjx;-1'
Containers&
Preservatives
\
4
c
\J
`.: Sample I.D. No. and Description
Date
Time
;
v
y
�L
8
=
¢
containers for each sample may be combined on one line)
y
D
2
2
2
f rr, f
: (3lt a (0- 3kF--
E-L"r-00 I
Qu
IQ-
R -15-
,
Possible Hazard Idenlifiralion
Semple Disposel
.,❑Non -Hazard ❑Flammable ❑ Skin Irritant ❑ Poison B ❑Unknown
(A lee maybe assessed ilsamples are retained'
❑ Return To Client Disposal By Leb El For Months longer than 3 months) _
• ; Tum Arcvad T(me Aequked
CC Requirements (Specify)
24 Hours ' ❑ 48 Hours ❑ 7 Days ❑ 14 Days
21 Days El Other
1 Relinquished By 1.
Date
Tlme
1. Received By _._
Dal
Time
S
g zz-cx,
Os 3
0
/rG�r�D
;+:2 Re0rquishetl By
.
Dale
Time
2, Received By
Dale
Time
'
3. Relinquished By -
Dale
Time
3. Received By
Data
Time
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE- Stays with the Sample; CANARY- Returned to Client with Report; PINK- Field Copy

MM111MIMIELEW
.,x.
Chain of qC gtody.
`Record
iiivanterra
Environmental
Services
Client
Pro/ecr Manager - -
Dale
SC
Chain Of Cuslody Number
70838
Q IaWteP
Address , ,
Telep one Number (Area Code)/F x Numb \
Lab Number
'
?
Page of
rary -
let
slere
2lppode,
slteconlacr
Lab Conrad
Analysis
(Attach
list
it
'..�:r:
mores
ace
is needed
-} :' ..
P ecr Name l p
CamerlWaybill Number r
/
J'
Special Instructions)
Conditions of Receipt
conba urehaseordarrouoreNo. 3'n
Containers&
.''.L4
Matrix
Preservatives
H
`Sample I.D. No. and Description
Date ''
Time
$
d�
rn
ti5
a
g
o
N
N
(Containers for each sample maybe combined on one line)
\
§
ryl
_
=
2
C
N
4'_ LIA- -
-v
r,
-rjo
Ilan
- -`ccF 3R
-/6v
0
6�)
�-
S r r
' Possrde lfereNldenfifiragon. ,,
,❑ Non -Hazard ' ❑ Flammable' ❑ Skin Irritant ElPoison B • ❑ Unknown
sample Disposal .
(A fee maybe assessed it samples are retained
ElRetum To Client ❑Disposal By Lab ❑Archive For Months longer than 3 months) -
*F,❑ 24 Hours ❑ 48 Hours ❑ 7 Days ❑ 14 Days D(
H ReGtpuished
t
qy 2 Relapuahed By
1
r '.a
3 Reibpuww By -
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE- Stays with the Sample;
.� ne9mremanrs ropecnp
❑ Other
Date Time
r
JARY - Returned to Client with Report; PINK - Field Copy

�.. 1 W
SEVERN TRENT LABORATORY-SACRAMENTO
ANALYTICAL REPORTS

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 1-RBSF(5)-1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-008 Work Order #... : DJC05102
Date Sampled...: o8/19/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
RESULT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
Total TCDD
ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
Total PeCDD
ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
ND
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
Total HxCDD
ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
Total HpCDD
ND
OCDD
ND
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
Total TCDF
ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
Total PeCDF
ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
Total HxCDF
ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
I'm
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
Total HpCDF
ND
OCDF
ND
PERCENT
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
70
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
79
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDD
71
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
81
_
13C-OCDD
73
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
73
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
83
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
78
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
86
DETECTION
LIMIT
0.48
0.48
0.54
0.54
0.48
0.39
0.40
0.48
0.31
0.31
0.65
0.24
0.24
0.29,
0.28
0.48
0.39
0.32
0.38
0.44
0.44
0.15
0.20
0.20
0.59
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 3.35)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 3.35)
(40 - 3.35)
(40 - 135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW646
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290,
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 1-R33SF(5)-1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-008
Date Sampled...: 0.8/19/00
Prep,Date...... : 08/28/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
Work Order #... : DJCD51.01
Date Received..: 08/23/00
Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
PARAMETER RESULT
Percent Lipids 1.9
DETECTION
LIMIT
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 1-RRBS(5)-21ZF
Trace Level Organic Compound:;
Lot -Sample #... : GOR230288-009 Work Order #... : DJC06102
Date Sampled...: 08/21/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
RESULT
2,3,7,E-TCDD
ND
Total TCDD
ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
Total PeCDD
ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
ND
Total HxCDD
ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
Total HpCDD
ND
OCDD
ND
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
Total TCDF
ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
Total PeCDF
ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
Total HxCDF
ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND '
Total HpCDF
ND
OCDF
NTD
PERCENT
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
59
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
68
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
65
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
72
13C-OCDD
64
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
64
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
72
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
70
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
77
DETECTION
LIMIT
0.45
0.45
0.74
0.74
0.58
0.47
0.47
0.58
0.41
0.41
0.82
0.32
0.32
0.40
0.38
0.57
0.44
0.36
0.42
0.50
0.50
0.18
0.23
0.23
0.73
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

Lot -Sample #... :
Date Sampled...:
Prep Date......:
Prep Batch #... :
Dilution Factor:
BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IAC 1-RI03S(5)-2RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
GOH230288-009 Work Order #... : DJC06101
08/21/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
0241250
1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Percent Lipids 3.3
Matrix........... BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290
rnuognone

ELUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 1-Pl= (5)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-010
Work Order #...:
DJC073.02
Matrix.........:
BIOLOGIC
-` Date Sampled...: 08/21/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00
Analysis Date..:
09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER -
RESULT
LIMIT _
UNITS
METHOD
,2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND -
0.38
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total I=
ND
0.38
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.57
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDD
ND
0.57
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.50
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.41
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.41
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDD
ND
0.50
pg/g
SW846
8290
112,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.26
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDD
ND
0.26
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDD
ND
0.64
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.47
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total TCDF
ND
0.47
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.35
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
D.33
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDF
ND
0.40
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.36
pg/g
SW846
6290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.29
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.34
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.40
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDF
ND
0.40
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.14
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.18
Pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDF
ND
0.18
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDF
ND
0.57
pg/g
SW846
8290
_
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
69
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
79
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
71
(40 - 135)
• 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
83
(40 - 135)
_
13C-OCDD
76
(40 - 13S)
,
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
74
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
84
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
81
(40 - 135)
_ 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
88
(40 - 135)

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 1-RRRH(5)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-010 Work Order #... : DJC07101
Date Sampled...: 08/21/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids 6.4 $ SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 1 %ES(5)-4WB
Trace Level Organic Compoimds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH23028B-021 Work Order #...: DJCOY102
.Date Sampled...: 08/21/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252255
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.37
Total TCDD
ND
0.37
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.53
Total PeCDD
ND
0.53
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.53
1,2,3,6,7,6-HpCDD
ND
0.44
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.44
Total HxCDD
ND
0.53
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.35
Total HpCDD
ND
0.35
OCDD
ND
4.2
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.49
Total TCDF
ND
0.93
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.39
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.37
Total PeCDF
ND
0.42
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.39
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.31
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.37
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
I4D
0.44
Total HpCDF
ND
0.44
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.16
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.21
Total HpCDF
ND
0.21
OCDF
ND
0.58
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
60
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
65
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDD
64
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
72
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
67
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
60
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
76
(40 -
135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 1-WHS(5)••4WB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-021
Date Sampled...: 08/21/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241259
Dilution Factor: 1
Work Order #...: DJCOK101
Date Received..: 08/23/00
Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
DETECTION
'PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT _ UNITS
Percent Lipids 5.4 METHOD 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 2-RBSF(5)-31F
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-003 Work Order #... : DJC00102
Date Sampled...: 08/19/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
Total HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARDS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
RESULT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PERCENT
RECOVERY
71
86
76
87
76
78
88
82
92
DETECTION
LIMIT _
0.31
0.31
0.76
0.76
0.69
0.57
0.57
0.69
1.1
1.1
0.92
0.27
0.27
0.47
0.45
0.59
0.61
0.49
0.59
0.69
0.69
0.26
0.33
0.33
1.2
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(40 - 135)
(40 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
(40 - 135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846'
8290
pg/g
'SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 4B-FHCF (5) -3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOR230288-013 Work Order #... : DJCOA101
Date Sampled...: 08/16/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Percent Lipids 4.5
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
!& SW846 8290
nnwD%noaa

BLUE R]DG£s PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 413-CAIZP(4)-4RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOE230288-025 Work Order #... : DJCOP102 Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252255
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
UNITS
METHOD
2,3,7,8-TCDD
4.4
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total
4.4
pg/g
SW846
8290
8-
1,2,3,78-PeCDD
,
ND
2.0
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDD
ND
2.0
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
2.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
8.8
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
ND
1.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDD
8.8
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,.2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
32
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDD
49
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDD
120
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF
4.2 CON
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total TCDF
4.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
1.9
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
2.8 J
Pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDF
2.8
Pg/4
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.9
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
2.7
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.53
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.59
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HXCDF
ND
18
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
2.3
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.76
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDF
OCDF
ND
3.2
Pg/9
SW846
8290
ND
0.57
pg/g
SW846
8290
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
64
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
71
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
67
(40 - 3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
73
(40 - 135)
13C-OCDD
70
(40 - 135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
62
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
68
(40 - 3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
70
(40 - 3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
62
(40 - 3.35)
CON Confirmadm anlyds.
] Fsd=md result. Result is le, Nan the repordng IiMIL

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4B-CARP(4)-4RF
Trace Level Organic Compound.
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-025 Work Order #... : DJCOP3.01 Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241259
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT _ UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids 22 !k SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client SampleID: BRP-LOC 4B-CARP(4)-SWB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-026 Work Order #... : DJC0Q102
Date Sampled...: 08/18/0o Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #...: 0252255
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
13
-
Total TCDD
13
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
3.0 J
Total PeCDD.
3.0
1,2,3,4,718-HxCDD
ND -
1.8
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
8.0
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD _
ND
1.3
Total EXCDD
8.0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
23
Total HpCDD
26
OCDD
56
2,3,7,8-TCDF
3.9 CON
Total TCDF
4.9
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
1.4
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
5.1
Total PeCDF
5.1
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
2.0
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.75
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.52
Total HxCDF
ND
14
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
1.7
1,.2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF.
ND
0.42
Total HpCDF
ND
2.2
OCDF
ND
0.55
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
63
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
65
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
72
(40 -
135)
i 13C-OCDD
70
(40 -
3.35)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
62
(40 -
].35)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
65
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
67
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
62
(40 -
3.35)
NOTE(S)-
J Estimated result. Reap is iess than the r eponing Iindt.
- CON Confirmation analysis.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290-•.
pg/q
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/q
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
82907
pg/g
SW846
8290'-
pg/q
SW846
8290'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/q
SW846
8290
-rnwo%noan

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 413-CARP(4)_5WB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOH230288-026
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241259
Dilution Factor: 1
Work Order #... : DJCOQ3.01
Date Received..: 08/23/00
Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids 26 % SW846 8290
r_nunonnee

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 5-RRHS(5)-1RF
'Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230268-017 Work Order #... : DJCOF102
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1 -
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.45
Total TCDD
ND
0.45
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.68
Total PeCDD
ND
0.68
-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.58
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
ND
0.47
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.47
Total HpCDD
ND
0.58
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.37
Total HpCDD
ND
0.37
OCDD
ND
1.4
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.50
Total TCDF
ND
0.50
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.40
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.38
Total PeCDF
ND
0.54
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.40
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.32
2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.38
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.44
Total HXCDF
ND
0.48
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.17
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.22
Total HeCDF
ND
0.22
OCDF
ND
0.70
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,'3,7,8-TCDD
66
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
70
(40 -.135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
70
.(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
80
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
73
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
77
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
79
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
85
(40 -
135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290,
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 5-R%BS(!5)-1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... :
GOH230288-017
Work Order #... .:
DJC0F101 Matrix ......... : BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled...:
08/18/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......:
08/28/00
Analysis Date..:
09/11/00
Prep Batch #... :
0241250
Dilution Factor:
1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids
4.2
_
k SW846 8290

n
BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-I.00 5-SMBS(!i)-2RF
Trace Level Organic Compound:;
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-018 Work Order #...: DJCOG102
Date Sampled...: 68/20/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.31
_
Total TCDD
ND
0.31
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.49
Total PeCDD
ND
0.49
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.46
1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.37
1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
ND
0.38
Total HpCDD
ND
0.46
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.56
Total HpCDD
ND
0.56
OCDD
ND
1.5
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.23
Total TCDF
ND
0.59
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.32
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.31
Total PeCDF
ND
0.40
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.35
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.28
2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.34
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
ND
0.40
Total HxCDF
ND
0.40
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.13
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.16
Total HpCDF
ND
0.16
OCDF
ND
0.51
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
64
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
70
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
68 -
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
76
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
71
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
67
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
74
(40 -
1.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
78
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
81
(40 -
1.35)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290.
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
r_nun�nnee

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC S-SMBS(S)-2RF
Txace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... :
GOH230288-018
Work Order #... :
DJCOG101
Date Sampled...:
08/20/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......:
08/28/00
Analysis Date..:
09/11/00
Prep Batch #... :
0241250
Dilution Factor:
1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
Percent Lipids
2.8
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
_% SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 5-BRRH(5)-31ZF
Trace Level organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230268-019 Work Order #... : DJCOH102
Date Sampled...: 08/20/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #...: 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.35
Total TCDD
ND
0.35
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.57
Total PeCDD,
ND
0.57
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.42
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.35
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.35
Total HXCDD
ND
0.42
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.44
Total HpCDD
ND
0.44
OCDD
ND
1.6
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1.2 CON
Total TCDF
1 2
.1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.33
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.32
Total PeCDF
ND
0.40
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.34
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.28
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.33
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.38
Total HxCDF
ND
0.38
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Hpr-DF
ND
0.14
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF
ND
0.18
Total HxCDF
ND
0.18
OCDF
ND
0.47
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
74
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
75
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
83
(40 -
0.35)
13C-OrDD
78
(40 -
3.35)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
72
(40--3.35)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
80
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
84
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
87
(40 -
3.35)
NOTE (S) :
CON ConLmu4on analysis.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
P9/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
P9/g
SW846
8290
pg/6
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 5-BRRH(S)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... :
GOH230288-019
Work Order #... :
DJC0H101
Date Sampled...:
08/20/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......:
08/28/00
Analysis Date..:
09/11/00
Prep Batch #...:
0241259
Dilution Factor:
1
DETECTION
PARP.METER
RESULT
LIMIT
Percent Lipids
11
_
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290
Q nu..n....n

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 5-NHS(5)-4WB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-001 Work Order #...: DJAXW102
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
NO
0.48
Total TCDD
ND
0.48
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.66
Total PeCDD
ND
0.66
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD -
NO
0.61
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
NO
0.50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
NO
0.51
Total HxCDD
ND
0.61
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
NO
0.48
Total HpCDD
ND
0.48
OCDD
NO
2.4
2,3,7,8-TCDF
0.89 J,CON
Total TCDF
1.7
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
NO
0.43
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ..
ND
0.41
Total PeCDF
.ND
0.43
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.48
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
NO
0.39
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
NO
0.46
.
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
NO
0.54
Total HxCDF
NO
0.54
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.20
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.25
Total HpCDF
ND
0.25
OCDF
ND
0.72
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS_
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
73
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD -
- 87
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
88
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD ..
79
(40 -
1351
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
78
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
91
(40 -
135%
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
84
(40 -
1351
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
96
(40 -
135)
NOTE (S): _
J Esd=ed MOIL Result is less than the reporting limit.
CAN Confirmation analysis.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS,
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290,.
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g.
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290.
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW646
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
p9/9
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 5-NBS(5)-4WB
Trace bevel Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOH230288-001 Work Order #...: DJAXW7.01-
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #...: 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT _ UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids 15 SW846 8290
GOH2302RR er - c­­M. ..

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-CARP (4) -4RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -.Sample #... : GOH230288-002 Work Order #... : DJAXXI02
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
_
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.1
Total TCDD
1.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
1.7
Total PeCDD
ND
1.7
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1.4
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hx,CDD
5.7
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.97
Total HxCDD
5.7
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
19
Total HpCDD
23
OCDD
47
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1.4 CON
Total TCDF
2.2
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
1.1
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
1.5
Total PeCDF
ND
11
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.4
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.55
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.64
Total HxCDF
ND
14
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
1.7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.48
Total HpCDF
ND
1.7
OCDF
ND
0.68
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS_
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
68
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,87PeCDD
61
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
80
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
74
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
87
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDF
82
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
76
(40 --135)
CON Coofumation analysis.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290"
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
-SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample M: BRP-IOC 4A-CARP (4) -4RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-002 Work Order #... : DJAXX101
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Percent Lipids 15
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 2-RBSF(5)-lRF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... :
GOH230288-003
Work Order #... :
DJC00101
Date Sampled...:
08/19/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......:
08/28/00
Analysis Date..:
09/11/00
Prep Batch #... :
0241250
Dilution Factor:
1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
Percent Lipids
3.3
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 2-R33SF(5)-2RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOH230288-004 Work Order #...: DJC01102
Date Sampled...: 08/19/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.43
_
Total TCDD
ND
0.43
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.66
Total PeCDD
ND
0.66
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.49
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.40
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.41
Total HxCDD
ND
0.49
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.61
Total HpCDD
ND
0.61
OCDD
ND
1.5
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.27
Total TCDF
ND
0.30
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.42
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.40
Total PeCDF
ND
0.46
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.39
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.31
2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.37
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.44
Total HXCDF
ND
0.44
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.19
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.24
Total HpCDF
ND
0.24
OCDF
ND
0.72
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
72
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
86
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
74
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
64
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
73
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
78
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
89
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
80
(40 -
:L35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-1-IpCDF
89
(40 -
135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

06Z8 968MS %
a0H,LEW SSINR
JI9oZo2e :......--- xTageK
SIWI'I
NOII:J3S3a
8'L spzdcZ '4uao=ad
lmss2f uaYaKvyvd
9
t
:=043eg uocgnjza
oSZLbZo
= " # go:jea da=d
00/II/60
:'-area SZSdZeny
oo/8Z/8o
: " " '•area da=d
00/£Z/Bo
: " pantaoag alea
00/61/80
: " paid=S a:ea -
Totzoora
= ...# =ap=o 3[=oM
40o-88ZoEmoo
= "_# aicbreS-'4o'I
SpmtodmoJ orae6=0 ZanaZ aDe=S
HHZ-(s)asE I-Z oo'I-dua :ai atdmeS -4uarm
• J�i�=FF�TiT7iFtf:r. �:fi=�a:�ii`.�'Gll{el

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 2-CARP(5)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOH230288-005 Work Order #...: DJCO2102 Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled...: 08/19/o0 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #...: 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
UNITS
METHOD
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.42
_
p9/g
SW846
8290
Total TCDD
ND
0.42
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.61
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDD
ND
0.64
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.53
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
2.5 J
Pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
ND
0.59
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDD
6.0
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
14
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDD
30
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDD
92
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND CON
0.35
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total TCDF
ND
0.72
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.46
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.44
pg/g
SW846
8290.
Total PeCDF
ND
0.72
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.57
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.46
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.55
pg/g
SWB46
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.64
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDF
ND
0.64
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.65
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.26
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total.HpCDF
ND
0.65
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDF
ND
0.79
pg/g
SW846
8290
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
73
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
85
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
76
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
88
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
81
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
79
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
90
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDF
82
(40 -
135)
'
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
94
(40 -
135)
NOTES) :
7 Estimated resWt. Remit is lets Nan the reporting limit.
CON Confirmation analysis.
r.nw"nOao 11 ,._-_-_--.-

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 2-CARP (5) -3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...;
GOH230288-005
Work Order #... :
DJCO2101
Date Sampled...:
08/19/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......:
08/28/00
Analysis Date..:
09/11/00
Prep Batch #... :
0241250
Dilution Factor:
1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
Percent Lipids
11
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-CARP(4)-SWB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample $... : GOH230288-006 Work Order $...: DJC031.02
Date Sampled...: OB/18/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/22j00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCOD
1 7
-
Total TCDD
1.7
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
1.5
Total PeCDD
ND
2.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
7.1
1,2,3,7,B,9-HxCDD
ND
1.5
Total HxCDD
7.1
1,2.,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
36
Total HpCDD
49
OCDD
110
2,3,7,8-TCDF
2.4 CON
Total TCDF
3.1
1,2,3,7,E-PeCDF
ND
1.5
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
2.0
Total PeCDF
ND
16
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
3.5
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.83
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.38
Total HXCDF
ND
16
112,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
3.2 J
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.72
Total HpCDF
3.2
OCDF
ND
1.3
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
.RECOVERY
LIMITS__
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
66
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
58
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
82
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
73
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
61
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
61
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
58
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
55
..(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
47
(40 -
135)
NOTE (S):
CON Confirmation analysis.
J Estimated =lt. Restilt is less than the reporting limit.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SWB46
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290 -
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
nnu�anonn

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-CARP(4)'-SWB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOH230288-006 Work Order #...: DJC03101
Date Sampled...: 08/18/00 - Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Percent Lipids 18
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3-CARP(5)-4WB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230268-007 Work Order #... : DJC04102
Date Sampled...: OB/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.67
_
Total TCDD
ND
0.67
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
1.3
Total PeCDD
ND
1.3
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.76
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
2.0
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.62
Total HxCDD
ND
2.0
112,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
7.7
Total HpCDD
11
OCDD
28
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1.2 CON
Total TCDF
1.2 CON
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.54
2,3,4,7,E-PeCDF
ND
0.52
Total PeCDF
ND
0.61
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.62
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.50
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.60
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.70
Total HXCDF _
ND
1.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.37
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.38
Total HpCDF
ND
0.38
OCDF
ND
0.79
.PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
62
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
63
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
74
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
68
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
66
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
77
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDF
68
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
78
(40 -
135)
NOTE (S):
CON ConFinnaflan analysts.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
0290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
r_nunonnee

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3-CARP(5)-4WB
Trace Level Organic Compound:-,
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-007 Work Order #... :
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..:
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..:
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER RESULT
Percent Lipids 7.4
DJC04101 Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
08/23/00
09/11/00
DETECTION
LIMIT UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4B-BC3zP(5)-1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-011 Work Order #... : DJC08102
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/14/00
Prep Batch #... : 02S2249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT'
2,3,7,8-TCDD
NO
0.41
_
Total TCDD
ND
0.41
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.69
Total PeCDD
NO
0.69
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
ND
0.55
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.45
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.45
Total HxCDD
ND
0.55
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
1.1
Total HpCDD
NO
1.1
OCDD
ND
1.2
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.40
Total TCDF
ND
0.40
1,2,3,7,84eCDF
NO
0.38
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.37
Total PeCDF
ND
0.48
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.44
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.35
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
DID
0.42
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.49
Total HxCDF
ND
0.49
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.18
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.23
Total HpCDF
ND
0.23
OCDF
ND
0.67
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS__
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
56
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
66
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
60
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
70
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
66
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
60
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
66
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
73
(40 -
135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW646
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SWB46
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGB PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4B-BCRP(5) -1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-011 Work Order #... : DJC08101
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #.... 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
Percent Lipids
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT _. UNITS METHOD
7.1 V; SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 413-BCRP(5)-2RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-012 Work Order #... : DJC09102
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/0o Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.37
Total TCDD
ND
0.37
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.52
'Total PeCDD
ND
0.52
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8-HxCDD
ND
0.50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.41
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.41
Total HxCDD
ND
0.50
.1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.94
Total HpCDD
ND
0.94
OCDD
ND
0.64
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.48
Total TCDF
ND
0.48
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.34
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.33
Total PeCDF
ND'
0.41
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
.ND
0.37
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.30
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.36
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
ND
0.42
Total HxCDF
ND
0.42
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.17
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND -
0.22
Total HpCDF
DTD
0.22
OCDF
ND
0.72
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
68
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
74
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
72
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
76
(40 '-
135)
13C-OCDD
71
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
71
(40 -
1.35)
13C-1,2,3,7',8-PeCDF
78
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
82
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8=HpCDF
82
(40 -
3.35)
Matrix..'......: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW646
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290'
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4B-BCRP(5)-2RF
Trace Level Organic Compound:;
Lot -Sample #... :
GOH230288-012
Work Order #... :
DJC09201
Date Sampled...:
08/15/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......:
08/28/00
Analysis Date..:
09/11/00
Prep Batch #... :
0241250
Dilution Factor:
1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
Percent Lipids
7.8
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290
r_nunennoe

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 4B-FHCF(5)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOR230288-013
Work Order #... :
DJCOA102
Matrix.........:
BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled...: 08/16/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00
Analysis Date,.:
09/15/00
.
_
'Prep Batch #--- : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
UNITS
METHOD
2.,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.42
pg/gSW846
8290
Total TCDD
ND
0..42
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.52
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDD
ND
0.52
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.44
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,.6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.40
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
ND
0.36
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDD
ND
0.44
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.90
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDD
ND
0.90
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDD
ND
2.0
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.27
pg/g
'SW846
8290
Total TCDF
ND
0.27
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.32
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.31
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDF _
ND
0.54
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.33
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.26
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.31
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.36
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDF
ND
0.36
pg/g
SW846
8290
1„2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.19
pg/g
SW846
8290
112,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.24
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDF
ND
0.24.
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDF
ND
0.59
pg/g
SW846
8290
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS__
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
60
(40 - 13!1)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
65
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
66
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
72
(40 - 135)
13C-OCDD
66
(40 - 135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
63
(40 - 135)
_ 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
70
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDF
75
(40 _ 195)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
78
(40 - 135)

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3-RBSF (5) -1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-014 Work Order #... : DJCOC102
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
_
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.43
Total TCDD
ND
0.43
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.63
Total PeCDD
ND
0.63
1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.55
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
ND
0.45
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.46
Total HxCDD
ND
0.55
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
1.6
Total HpCDD
ND
1.6
OCDD
7.3 J
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.43
Total TCDF
ND
0.55
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.31
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.30
.Total PeCDF
ND
0.44
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.43
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.35
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.41
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
ND
0.48
Total HpCDF
ND
0.91
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.20
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.26
Total HpCDF
ND
0.26
OCDF
ND
0.62
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
64
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
70
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
68
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
74
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
67
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
67
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
78
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
78
(40 -
135)
1 Estimated rewlL Rc jt is ka than the reporting limit.
Matrix ......... : BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3-RBSF(5)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-014 Work Order #...:
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..:
Prep Date......: 08/28/00 Analysis Date..:
Prep Batch #... : 0241250
Dilution Factor: 1 -
PARAMETER RESULT
Percent Lipids 4.2
DJCOC101 Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
08/23/00
09/11/00
DETECTION
LIMIT. _ UNITS METHOD
% SW846 8290

Lot -Sample #... :
Date Sampled...:
Prep Date......:
Prep Batch #...:
Dilution Factor:
BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3 -CARP (5) -3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
GOH230288-016
08/15/00
08/28/00
0241250
1
Work Order #... : DJCOE101
Date Received..: 08/23/00
Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT _
Percent Lipids 5.5
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
!k SW846 8290
:nwo,n000

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3-RBSF (5) -2RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-015 Work Order #... : DJCOD1.02
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
NO
0.32
--
Total TCDD
ND
0.32
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
NO
0.46
Total PeCDD
ND
0.46
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
NO
0.38
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.31
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
NO
0.32
Total HxCDD
ND
0.38
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.65
Total HpCDD
ND
0.65
OCDD
ND
1.5
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.39
Total TCDF
ND
0.55
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.28
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.27
Total PeCDF
ND
0.36
1,2,,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.29
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.23
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.28
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.32
Total HxCDF
ND
0.32
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.16
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF.
ND
0.21
Total HpCDF
ND
0.21
OCDF
ND
0.49
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
71
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
78
(40 -
235)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
83
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
78.
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
74
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
84
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
86
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
87
(40 -
3.35)
Matrix.......... BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290

06ZB "SMS g
QOHISR SIINII
JI9OZOIa c" " '--'•xtsgeyt
._ Z Z Spcd-Li :I=oiaa
IINtI'I I alsau 'dslsw uycl
NOIIJ3I3a
T
OSZTbZO
00/TT/60 : "aIea SZSA-EmW 00/BZ/BO
00/£Z/B0 ' "paazaoaa area 00/si/80
TOTa0oP0 = ""# zapmo $aoM 510-88ZOEZH0D
SprxnodmoJ ozaesao Ianal aoezl
dHZ-(S)3SaX-E 00`I-cTE9 e(II aTdmeS 3aacT:)
:)Ni: S7JdaOm wafiia HJQIB ffi)'I8:
=zoioed aoignTia
• '"# mpgeH da=a
....ale¢ da=d
paTd=S agea
# aTdmes-7o'I

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 3-CARP (5) -3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-016 Work Order #... : DJCDE102
Date Sampled...: 08/15/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.53
--
Total TCDD
ND
0.53
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.52
Total PeCDD
ND
0.52
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.42
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.95
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.35
Total HxCDD
ND
0.95
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
4.4 J
Total HpCDD
7.3
OCDD
21
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND CON
0.57
Total TCDF
ND
0.57
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.32
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.44
Total PeCDF
ND
1.2
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.31
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.25
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.29
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.34
Total HxCDF
ND
0.55
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.23
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.18
Total HpCDF
ND
0.23
OCDF
ND
0.48
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
70
(40 -
_
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
74
(40..-
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
79
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
75
(40 _'135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
72
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
80
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
82
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
85
(40 -
135)
NOTE (S):
1 Estimated result. Result is less than the reporting limit.
CON Confirmation analysis.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg%g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
6290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290.
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 2-CARP(Si -4WB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-020 Work Order #... :
DJCOJ1.02
Matrix.........:
BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled...: 08/19/00
Date Received..:
08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00
Analysis Date..:
09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252249
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
UNITS
METHOD
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
_
0.34
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total TCDD
ND
0.34
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
1.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDD
ND
1.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1.0
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
3.0 J
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.69
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDD
3.0
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
14
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HpCDD
20
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDD
69
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF
-� 1.2 CON
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total TCDF
1.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.59
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.80
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total PeCDF
ND
4.7
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.8
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
1.2
pg/g
SW846
8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.50
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.58
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HxCDF
ND
9.6
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
1.6
pg/g
SW846
8290
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.29
pg/g
SW846
8290
Total HeCDF
ND
1.6
pg/g
SW846
8290
OCDF
ND
1.5
pg/g
SW846
8290
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
67
_
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
73
(40 - 135)
13 C - 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 -HxCDD
72
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
78
(40 - 135)
13C-OCDD
76
(40 - 135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
69
(40 - 3.35)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
77
(40 - 3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
81
(40 - 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
84
(40 - 135)
7 Estimated s= t. Revell is less than ft reponing IimiL
CON Confirmation analysis.

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 2-CARP(5)-4WB
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-020 Work Order #... : DJCOJ1ol Matrix.......... BIOLOGIC
i_ Date' .Samgled... : 08/19/00 Date Received..: 08/'23/00
Prep Date......:'08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #...: 0241259
Dilution -Factor: 1'
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT __ UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids 5.5 SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LAC 4A-BCRP(5)-3-RF
Trace Level Organic Compound,
Lot -Sample #... : GOB230288-022 Work Order #... : DJC0L102
Date Sampled...: 08/16/00 Date Received..: O8/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252255
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
NO
0.29
Total TCDD
ND
0.29
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.54
Total PeCDD
ND
0.54
1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.52
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.43
1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
ND
0.43
Total HxCDD
ND
0.52
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.36
Total HpCDD
ND
0.36
OCDD
ND
0.93
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.34
Total TCDF
ND
0.34
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.34
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.33
Total PeCDF
ND
0.34
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.37
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.30
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.36
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
ND
0.42
Total HxCDF
ND
0.42
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.17
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
0.21
Total HpCDF
ND
0.21
OCDF
ND
0.50
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
64
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
67
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
69
(40 -
3.35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
75
(40 -
3.35)
13C-OCDD
72
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
66
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
76
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
81
(40 -
135)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
p9/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290.
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
p9/g
SW846
8290
p9/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
S14846
8290

Lot -Sample #...:
Date Sampled...:
Prep Date......;
Prep Batch #...:
Dilution Factor:
BLUE R1"DGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-BCRP(S)-1RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
GOH230288-022
08/16/00
08/28/00
0241259
1
Work Order #...: DJC0L101
Date Received..: 08/23/00
Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Percent Lipids 3.0
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
t SW846 8290

I_ BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-IOC 4A-BCRP(5)-2RP
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOR230288-023 Work Order #... : DJCOM1.01 Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
Date Sampled....: 08/16/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date ...... : 08/28/00 Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241259
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT_ UNITS METHOD
Percent Lipids 6.3 $ SW846 8290

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-13CRP(5)-2RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230286-023 Work Order #.... DJCOM7.02
Date Sampled...: 08/16/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/OB/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #... : 0252255
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
0.24
_
Total TCDD
ND
0.24
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
0.45
Total PeCDD
ND
0.45
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.40
1,2,3,6;7,8-HxCDD
ND
0.33
1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
ND
0.33
Total HxCDD
ND
0.40
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
0.69
Total HpCDD
ND
0.69
OCDD
ND
1.6
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.32
Total TCDF
ND
0.32
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.27
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.27
Total PeCDF
ND
0.31
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.27
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.22
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.26
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.30
Total HxCDF
ND
0.30
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.13
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
-0.17
Total HpCDF
ND
0.17
OCDF
ND
0.49
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
69
(40 -
:L35)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
75
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
75
(40 -
:L35)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
82
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
78
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
71
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
80
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
81
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
87
(40 -
].35)
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
p9/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/9
-SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/9
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
r_nuoonnoo

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-CCF(5)-3RF
Trace Level Organic Compoimdt>
Lot -Sample #... : GOH230288-024 Work Order #...: DJCON102
Date Sampled...: 08/16/00 Date Received..: 08/23/00
Prep Date......: 09/08/00 Analysis Date..: 09/15/00
Prep Batch #...: 0252255
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
2,3,7,8-TCDD
0.70 J
—�
Total TCDD
0.70
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
.0.71
Total PeCDD
ND
0.71
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
ND
0.43
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1.8
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND
0.35
Total HxCDD
ND
1.8
1,2.,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
1.8
Total HpCDD
ND
1.8
OCDD
7.0 J
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
0.48
Total TCDF
ND.
6.7
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
DID
0.29
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.37
Total PeCDF
ND
1.8
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
ND
0.42
1,2,3,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.34
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
0.41
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
0.47
Total HXCDF
ND
0.93
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
0.33
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeCDF
ND
0.061
Total HpCDF
ND
0.33
OCDF
ND
0.55
PERCENT
RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS
RECOVERY
LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
69
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
76
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
72
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
77
(40 -
135)
13C-OCDD
72
(40 -
135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
67
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
71
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
76
(40 -
135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
73
(40 -
135)
NOTE (S):
J Eui+na result. Result Is less than the reponing HmL.
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS
METHOD
Pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
Pg/g
SW846
8290 .
Pg/g
SW846
8290
pg/g
SW846
8290
GOH2309AA cn c..........__.-

BLUE RIDGE PAPER PRODUCTS INC
Client Sample ID: BRP-LOC 4A-CCF (5) -3RF
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot -Sample #...: GOH230288-024
Date Sampled...: 08/16/00
Prep Date......: 08/28/00
Prep Batch #... : 0241259
Dilution Factor: 1
Work Order #... : DJCON101
Date Received..: 08/23/00
Analysis Date..: 09/11/00
PARAMETER RESULT
Percent Lipids 8.5
DETECTION
LIMIT
Matrix.........: BIOLOGIC
UNITS METHOD
-% SW846 8290