20190800 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2020_20210125

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190800 Version* 1
.................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 01/25/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/25/2021
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands 17 Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Lindsay Crocker [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20190800 Version:*1
Existing ID1 Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Boseman
County: Edgecombe
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Boseman_1 001 19_MY1_2020.pdf 4.05MB
Rease upload only one R7F of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:*
may tare

Annual Monitoring Report (MY1)
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Edgecombe County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7872
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
RFP No. 16-007711
Prepared for:
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
FINAL DRAFT January 4th, 2021
ilk
_._
?b4
4
;dry • . 4 . 4- :6 't
• y.'- " 2 . ' ::ffir's,' •ex,,,-0 24.-6,14,?:,-,---, I-)t
� ..:��", �,�. � ��r—�+:_,� �_ tin:,u

ROY COOPER
Governor
t•tia
MICHAEL REGAN
Secretmy
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 7, 2020
Via email:Scott Frederick<[e-mail]>
Scott Frederick,Soil, Water&Environment Group
(For Ecoterra)
Subject: DMS Comments
Boseman, Project ID#100110, DMS Contract#7872
Scott,
After receiving the MY1 draft report, DMS offers the following comments:
• Update photos for clarity if possible.
• The vegetation data presented shows that most plots are meeting success, besides one which is
only one stem below success. Compared to MYO,there is a>80% plant survival and over 8
species in the vegetation plots which is considered positively. Please explain if/why a site-wide
replant of 280 stems/acre is necessary at this point. Please provide a visual assessment of the
site(planted stem vigor, etc.)in the narrative.
• Table 3. Update Current Plot data header to show MY1. Provide MY0 annual summary data
next to MY1 annual summary column (exporting Table 7 from CVS should do this for you).
Digital Review-
• The CVSta ble 7 export does not produce the same stems per acre as table 3 in the report for
plots 2,3,6,and 9. There are also 14 plots in the table 7 export rather than 12. Please ensure
that the CVS mdb supports the data presented in table 3 and resubmit the CVS mdb.
• Please submit the veg plot and photo point monitoring features used in Fig.3.
• Please submit the photo point photos as JPEGs.
Please call if you have any questions a bout these comments and insert the responses after your cover
page to the report. Thanks for your work,
id61
4-1 Zie 1
Lindsay Crocker, DMS
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center 217 W.Jones Street,Suite 3000 Raleigh,NC 2 760 9-165 2
919 7078976 T

110.
eco terra®
MEMO
Mrs. Lindsay Crocker, DMS
1/4/21
Re: boseman Annual Monitoring Report Comments (DMS Email Dated:
12/07/20)
After receiving the MY1 draft report, DMS offers the following comments:
• Update photos for clarity if possible.
o The photos have been updated.
• The vegetation data presented shows that most plots are meeting
success, besides one which is only one stem below success.
Compared to MYO, there is a >80% plant survival and over 8 species
in the vegetation plots which is considered positively. Please explain
if/why a site-wide replant of 280 stems/acre is necessary at this
point. Please provide a visual assessment of the site (planted stem
vigor, etc.) in the narrative.
o Additional stems are proposed to ensure diversity of planted
species is maintained throughout the site considering overall
visual assessment of the site and noted impacts from
predation, flooding, and site maintenance (mowing).
o A visual assessment of the site including planted stem vigor
and overall site success has been provided in the narrative.
• Table 3. Update Current Plot data header to show MY1. Provide MYO
annual summary data next to MY1 annual summary column
(exporting Table 7 from CVS should do this for you).
o Table 3 has been updated.
Digital Review-
• The CVS table 7 export does not produce the same stems per acre
as table 3 in the report for plots 2,3,6, and 9. There are also 14 plots in
the table 7 export rather than 12. Please ensure that the CVS mdb
supports the data presented in table 3 and resubmit the CVS mdb.
o Table 7 has been updated to match Table 3.
• Please submit the veg plot and photo point monitoring features used
in Fig. 3.
o Veg plot, photo points, and monitoring feature .shp files have
been provided.
1117 Peachtree Walk NE,STE 126,Atlanta,GA 30309 I 404.596.8004 EcoTerra.com

Ito
eco terra®
• Please submit the photo point photos as JPEGs.
o Vegetation photos in .jpeg format have been provided.
Please let us know if you have any further comments or questions.
We look forward to ensuring a successful project moving forward.
Regards,
Ted Griffith
1117 Peachtree Walk NE,STE 126,Atlanta,GA 30309 I 404.596.8004 EcoTerra.com

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (MY1)
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Edgecombe County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7872
DMS ID No. 100119
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
HUC 03020101
Prepared For:
M10ya71w1 Services
EkYiYPMEMAI VVALFT
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared By:
eco terra
1117 Peachtree Walk NE, Suite 126
Atlanta, GA 30309
404.840.2697
This Annual Monitoring Report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the
following:
• 15A NCAC 02B.0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory
mitigation.
Contributing Staff
Ted Griffith, Principal in Charge Norton Webster, Landowner Laison
Michael Bienenson, Quality Assurance Lead Scott Frederick, Construction and Monitoring
Jamey O'Shaughnessey, Quality Assurance and Lead, SWE
Construction Oversight David Cooper, QA/QC, VHB

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Mitigation Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Goals 1
1.2 Existing Conditions and Parcel Viability 2
2.0 Determination of Credits 2
3.0 Vegetation Condition Summary 3
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities 3
4.0 Annual Monitoring and Performance Criteria 4
4.1 Vegetation 4
4.2 Photo Reference Stations 4
4.3 Visual Assessments 4
4.4 Annual Reporting Performance Criteria 4
4.5 Maintenance and Contingency Plans 4
5.0 References 5
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Project Data
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Project Component/Asset Map
Figure 3: Monitoring Plan View
Table 1: Buffer Project Attributes
Table 2: Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Appendix 2 Site Photo Points
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 3: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
ecojerra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page i December 2020

1.0 Mitigation Project Summary
The Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site (Site) is a riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas
restoration project located approximately 2.5 miles southeast of the Town of Rocky Mount in
Edgecombe County,NC (Appendix 1: Figure 1). The Site is approximately 14.91 acres (649,889
ft2) of a total 276 ac tract situated along two unnamed tributaries to the Tar River (Appendix 1:
Figure 2). The project is located in a targeted local watershed (TLW) within the Tar-Pamlico
River basin hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020101120030 and Subasin 03-03-02. The unnamed
tributaries flow into the Tar River approximately one and half miles downstream of the project.
According to the as-built survey and most recent DWR Buffer Mitigation Calculation Tool V.2
(Updated 1/17/20), the Site is expected to generate 617,518.702 riparian buffer mitigation units
(BMU).
The Boseman Buffer Mitgation Site will
help to reduce future sediment and
nutrient loading into the unnamed
tributaries and downstream Tar River. It
will also improve terrestrial habitats along
this stream by establishing a riparian
corridor and allowing the land to convert
to forested communities. The surrounding
area is primarily agricultural fields. The
project restored forested riparian buffers
and adjacent riparian areas to a maximum
of approximately 115 feet from the top of
bank of the streams and removed rotating
crops and fertilizer inputs. The restored
Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer and adjacent
riparian areas will filter runoff from the surrounding farm fields and provide shading to improve
stream temperatures and aquatic habitat. Invasive vegetation will be treated as needed within the
project area to promote native vegetation.
1.1 Project Goals
According to the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services' (DMS) 2010 Tar-Pamlico River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) document, amended 2018,the project will support the identified
goals for the TLW, as well as the overall HUC. As stated in the RBRP, restoration of riparian
buffers and adjacent riparian areas to address agricultural runoff is a high priority for this 14-digit
TLW HUC.
The major goals of the proposed buffer restoration project are to address agricultural runoff,
including nutrients and sediment, protect the project site in perpetuity, and restore terrestrial
habitat. The detailed goals and objectives are:
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
ecojerra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 1 December 2020

Reduce Nutrient Levels — Nutrient inputs will be decreased by filtering runoff and sequestering
nutrients dispersed from stormwater flows from agricultural fields. These nutrients will be
absorbed through the 30-115 ft wide riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas restored with
native woody vegetation. This goal is supported by both the TLW and RBRP for reducing
nutrient inputs to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin.
Reduce Sediment Levels — Sediment inputs will be decreased by filtering runoff and attenuating
flood flows from agricultural fields through 30-115 ft wide riparian buffer and adjacent riparian
areas restored with native woody vegetation. This goal is supported by both the TLW and RBRP
for reducing sediment inputs to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin.
Project Protection in Perpetuity — Implement a project in a TLW and record a conservation
easement. This goal is supported by the RBRP to protect aquatic habitat and surface waters.
Restore Terrestrial Habitat — Riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas will be restored with
native vegation and invasive vegetation will be managed. This goal is supported by the RBRP
and is a DMS Programmatic Goal(NCGS 143-214.10).
1.2 Existing Site Conditions
The buffer restoration project contains approximately 14.9 acres of former agricultural fields
along two unnamed tributaries (hereinafter referred to as UT 1, and UT 2).
UT 1 enters the project site along the western property boundary and flows in an eastward
direction. UT 1 meets the definition of at least intermittent per the NCDWR On-Site
Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules Letter dated July 9, 2019
(Appendix 1). UT 2 originates within the property boundary as an ephemeral channel (Reach 2a)
and transitions to an intermittent channel (Reach 2b)prior to it's confluence with UT 1.
The project was successfully planted with appropriate trees and herbaceouse vegetation and is
now at the end of the first full growing season and early stages of successful buffer restoration.
2.0 Determination of Credits
Riparian buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration was accomplished in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) including the alternative
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
ecojerra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 2 December 2020

mitigation option of restoration activities along ephemeral streams. Restoration was
accomplished specifically by:
Buffer Restoraiton on Ephemeral Channels (15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(7)):
a.) NCDWR conducted an on-site stream determination of subject streams and ephemeral
channels on the property
b.) Ephemeral channels are directly connected to intermittent or perennial stream channels
c.) Total mitigation area of ephemeral channels is less than 25%of the total buffer mitigation
area(Table 2,Appendix 1).
All areas within 115 ft of the top of bank of subject streams as measured from the top of bank
landward, will be devoted to generating riparian buffer mitigation credits. Total mitigation area
on ephemeral channels is 12.7% of total buffer mitigation area. Mitigaiton credits generated are
found in Table 2 and Figure 2 in Appendix 1 and are based upon the most recent DWR Buffer
Mitigation Calculation Tool v 2 (Updated 1/17/20).
3.0 Project Construction Summary
The project construction was completed in early March 2020, following mitigation plan approval.
Eco Terra and supporting team members successfully planted and restored the proposed areas
dedicated for riparian buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration with high quality native trees,
shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation.
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Restoration of the riparian areas involved planting bare root one to two-year-old trees and shrubs
in designated planting zones based on soil wetness and in accordance with the mitigation plan. In
addition, five to six-year-old trees were planted at representatively selected areas designated for
plots to aid in identifying plot locations. These trees are not included in any individual plot tree
count. However, they are an overall beneficial component of stem diversity and age-class in the
restored forest ecology and serve as important components in restored habitat, nutrient
sequestration, leaf litter for trapping sediment,and soil health. A combination of machine and
manual planting techniques were used depending on site conditions. Older trees were planted by
a combination of hand and machine.
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
CCOlCi I C7. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 3 December 2020

Species planted within the riparian areas included: overcup oak (Quercus laurifolia) 2,500 stems,
laurel oak (Quercus lyrata) 1,000 stems, water oak (Quercus nigra) 3,000 stems, willow oak
(Quercus phellos) 3,000 stems, green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 500 stems, silky dogwood
(Cornus amomum) 1,000 stems, button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) 500 stems, and swamp
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora) 300 stems. Approximately 12,300 stems (825 stems/ac)
were planted within the riparian areas designated for restoration. Differences in stem density and
quantities occurred relative to the proposed planting list in the mitigation plan due to plant
availability at the time.
Temporary and permanent seed mix was installed in any disturbed soil areas following debris
removal and planted with native trees to secure sediment from entering surface waters.
Temporary and permanent seed mixtures planted included Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and
Indiangrass (Sorgastrum nutans), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and big bluestem
(Andropogon gerardii),respectively.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a sufficient density of stems was planted to achieve
260 trees/ac at the end of a minimum five-year project monitoring period whereby no one tree
species planted was greater than 50% of the planted stems, and a minimum of four native
hardwood tree and native shrub species were planted. In total, eight species were selected and
planted in specific areas depending on soil type, landscape position, soil wetness, community type,
and reference forest stands nearby. Initial vegetation management post planting included specific
preemergent herbicide band application over planted trees for herbaceous competition that may
compete with planted stems,conducted by a North Carolina licensed applicator.
4.0 Annual Monitoring and Performance Criteria
The Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers (15A
NCAC 02B .0295) and RFP 16-007711 set forth specific performance criteria for the successful
development and close-out of the Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site. Performance criteria
monitoring includes standardized vegetation plot establishment and annual monitoring for planted
stems including individual plot photo documentation, overall site photo documentation, biannual
visual assessments for project status and easement integrity including herbaceous and/or invasive
species competition, stem mortality, stand health, incidental damage from agricultural equipment,
and stem loss or damage from natural causes such as fire, disease, or animal predation. Figure 3
(Appendix 1) illustrates the location of project easement, permanent vegetation plots/photo points,
as well as overall site photo points.
4.1 Vegetation
Twelve permanent vegetation plots were established according to the most recent Carolina
Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocol within the restored buffer area. Representative vegetation
plots were established at a minimum density of 2% of the planted area. Specifically, vegetation
monitoring was obtained for all plots according to Level 1-2 protocols from the CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation V4.2 (2008) manual. Monitoring year one (MY1) vegetation
stem data is included in Appendix 5, Table 3. All vegetation plots meet criteria for stem densities
and overall site density is 533 stems/ac. Some plots showed stem diversity and distribution
disproportionate to the overall project stem diversity and distribution. In addition, two site wide
flooding events,mowing activities to control herbaceouse competition, as well as herbivores
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
CCOlCi I C7. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 4 December 2020

above and below ground damaged some trees in the project area. Additional tree species (Qty:
4,200, n=3) will be planted during the upcoming dormant season to accommodate these
inconsistencies in stem diversity, distribution, and density observed and noted in plot data.
Planting additional stems will also ensure project success with anticipated predation and flooding
likely to occur again based on first year observations.
4.2 Photo Reference Stations
Individual plot photos taken at the southwest corner (origin) of each plot are included in this
annual monitoring report. Additional Site reference photos were taken at designated points along
the conservation easement boundary providing an overall view of the project success (Appendix
1: Figure 3). All photo points were located by survey and georeferenced for map production to
provide a consistent means for photo replication annually and in the event a plot or photo location
must be reestablished during the monitoirng period. Photo orientation (direction and bearing)
were recorded as well as approximate vertical position for consistency in photo logging.
4.3 Visual Assessments
Additional observations were made of site conditions and vegetation conditions outside of
monitoring plots. This biannual effort was made in order to appropriately monitor changing site
conditions and address any issues to ensure Site success and performance criteria are met after the
monitoring period. As dicussed supplemental planting will occur during the upcoming dormant
season to bring up tree stocking and diversity across the project area and ensure success in areas
damaged by flooding and predation. Overall tree vigor across the site is adequate for first year
survival and project success averaging 3.3 No other encroachments were identified during the
two site visits in June and September. Any future Site problems will be noted and discussed in
the annual reports and monitored biannually to ensure performance criteria are met following any
remedial action.
4.4 Annual Reporting Performance Criteria
All monitoring reports, including this annual report, will be compiled and submitted to DMS
annually in accordance with the Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Buffer Baseline and Annual
Monitoring Report Template Ver. 2.0 (May 2017). Annual monitoring will occur for a minum of
five years or until performance criteria are met.
4.5 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
Any Site observations identified through vegetation plots or visual assessments, whereby the
performance criteria is not met, will be noted and discussed in the annual reports and addressed
with a contingency plan as necessary. DMS/NCDWR will be notified, and if necessary,
collaborate with Eco Terra to develop a contingency plan with remedial action steps to correct the
performance criteria deficiency. Any contingency plan and remedial actions will occur within an
agreed timeframe and monitoring adjusted accordingly, if necessary. Site problem areas will be
monitored biannually to ensure performance criteria are met following any remedial action.
As noted above, supplemental planting will occur in the upcoming dormant season to remediate
stem density and diversity consistencies as well as damage attributed to mowing and herbivores.
Upon completion of this remedial action, DMS/NCDWR will be notified.
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
CCOlCi I C7. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 5 December 2020

5.0 References
15 NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers. 2015.
Lee, Michael T. Peet, Robert K., Steven D. Wentworth, Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Web Soil Survey of Edgecombe County.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.goviapp/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS). 2017. Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Buffer Baseline and Annual Monitoring
Report Template Version 2.0.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS). 2018. Tar-Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities.
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Annual Monitoring Report MY1
ecojerra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 6 December 2020

APPENDIX 1
FIGURES AND TABLES

...-.._.-. J..- - .-.•`. ...,.....-°'---- 9....
'... . - ,.. , . • .
* .
..." : ? . ..... .....
../••..L-'• •I , 4., . •%-,
-ail. ' - e' ..." . ••1 ••'... .._
i•.-.•.., . , „. ..-^9. '-'• L / •.- '. I
-
-- I .• • I. .--\'.. ..-•--..
- ...,--.-z. t ') -'•-- %
-- „--- •
•• '... ...
97• . -._. -----.--= -5-5--ii, . - - --.---,-..:...._ •-_, .-.• ...• • . ..• .-••.•' .. .- . . .1 '-: . L %.•‘----, ;•--.
..--
• ...• ; .... . r r
--•-••9.-
.-• LL ...,4..g`-r- ...
... ..... ... ..1- . \ .
....----9. .• I
--%- •,,I I \ I- .9 -'. ••••• •--
..- r---., ) ......-:_=, 50,-.-.-j-_--_=-'--1--- -- - ..-:::.:::... •. ...• 4.
-., :-.-r , ' .. 1. •
L I
.. --•• 1 l' .1 1 ; Ii ,
.......
...2.?:'•••.- ......::•::-.,9--- 5 ..-/'--.- --..; •-. \ \
. . .. I ••.
' ... . .••-•.._Q L. ; ::•.r.
...• - . [...rt.- I ...'
r ... . Y. .. ...• ..-•
ICI rril--y• . ...,---------7=-• 1 .--;;.'•••:.9.L.::--.9' rri i , ._ ....I . p. .1 \ ... '''' l' 1
.? -.. c-.-_-•--.-. I
I .11 ' 1111 P.Pa,, i•
<7.5-' ".... '.• '.... '. •-....' C-'. ."., Z %. r
--' '• ,e_........
- .-
. - .
--..• --
- - \•••.-........ .• I '‘'•
\ "..
„. ...... ..-9.--......._....-/,_ _ .. . .. .„.
.-.-••• ‘.... ....‘ \ I ..s.
'E- ---=-:.- - ... ....‘...• ....., -)) Ir.. •.... . ' ' '. '
mr - .. .:.:;:•:•:.9...--9. ri y -... -.... ......•
C-... r......I
•• \ ‘...' • •-_
••- 9r. .... __,. 1... .
7.- 2 ._7-_ --,::-:-...:.--•-- _.......,' r.
. / , _ .--•--‘..r. ) ...I y ... 1 .. .
- ---.- -s- • ...-.. •-. I .
r•- 4:)Q.• .,-..; 7__2, "Q
.....--- --.--•-." . ..•. ..' e•• l .-0•- N.. ..- '--.'-'‘..' . , I
' . • .' .
.•
• „ .
•---- ___....- „ • ... '„'.. ''..„, ._ ... ,
. -•• e.
li I ..... ... .. . .:-...... I \ • 4.IIII
•• TOW" I I I I i ...• CI
.. .
i .
..
• „. '„. , 1 .' _--... _ • ..- . „ i . • . ... ..r
,.
. I 1 L •
_ ___•
.• I .. ... I %.•-• I I 1 I j 1'1
Li
.. ...... '... . %C:1..
‘..• )
• 1--•El \.I ..... ,.. i L. ..9..--_.. ...._,,
. •
I/9: 11I •-. -.... . •F 9e.i. Al. \•-.... 1 1
•• ..'•\ • 1. 1
--------.._. ...... ••,. I %, ... .....-..--., .. , - .. .
... , .. ...
• • .... .. 1 I I
.. Old Tow n -\ .,, . + ..-- .. ; .„. .... .... , .....c„., .. \ \ .....,... .....,.... 1
-
.
, ..,
i
C enri ....._.-> ... '.. ..
, / .., ..._...7 1 . -'-''' --.."^-• . ) .P'‘, I % , 1
, ......... i...:../ L...24
I , -..„. .... • \• ••• 1 ,..
0-66 E ... , ., ,.• ... „. .„.. ,
. .
., , .. .... , .. .._ . .,, • •. . .. .
. •. , .
....., ., ....,
_. . .... ..• .....-- .."
.: ..
•
..
• .. %".---:... \i. '-• . . . •
...
.' .
. .
' -
I .... ..
. . . .__
,...... / •-_ ---- • I , ' •••,.......ry,... .
,•I, / , 1 . • ‘•-• '..•11.1... a...a .....•-••
. ,- -.. i--- I A.''.... •.. .'.. \ .2 .. ."-. .•,..) •I .-- I : .•. I . ..
...•/ ‘...... -,
.1. _..,.• t--I I •--...2 ....• ••• e:e II I .
... 1..
• ....---., C:....• -.. . r ..ile 9..
•••-- " e . ••I
..-•••?41fil!'•-- x .1 •'1.1.
. ..•
. 1 , •••
. ....._
.. ( ••••-•-.. " -'•'..e ‘......--. •....
....:
''. , .. - .
•
I .1
• • I ...1••% .-.- ,... ,-;•;.... '. 1
'.-----e '1*.; 1 , . ---. •
. .
'
• ',. '1. I 1'21 I
..
../ -_..•
. . • ,
I .... '....
. V . •
....
..__•••-•••,_...• .... ...••••-•%-- ".:'.. 7- : ;: . •_... ‘.' ..../ . I
0 .... ... ,.. ....„. •• . ... 1
.. ,
..... ...--_ ..-.... ,. . /
.,.-4 .....------..... l'f•-. I Ses\ -... \ ... •.' ) 1 N4444,_ •-••
.•-
'.• .1 r i.........
• . .1 •
.--•••--•-•' ., ( I ,'' • ' ' • .. .
.. •
..---...\''-•-. r‘-- ..";-..
.---
/ ' ... . II i 1, I'. - .W,4---/
_ -_ • , . -. \....:. ----...• ••.,•••• • . ••_•...._.,..._•_...._ _.
,•••_. .
•
., ,•, ... \ .
-,-----...- , •,, ,: -••••.........
..._ _•• ,,\...."...... ..,..... '! [ii 1 ,..../ ....
1 i
1 %....illiff.°A . )
....-- .% l'• .
9,j•
'-....
• •
•'_, a. ,
..I. -.
__ ...L.....
: ... -, i ',.....
., ......,..
. _... .
75.--. )), ) ; " ' I
-1 ay-. I , r..,. .. „ _. ..••, _
, f.,I.,_. • - ,, -- • - ••.-- -.. •
11). ,....- .../.,,, .. ; _ ..•••• 9- - _.....1Ma. I.
IC--- -..-I ''. '.-.... .... i j)
••••-...:-.- --:„ P....?.....1 I ••• I .. '...-...\ .-.... -.... , I .7_..''..
I ....
.. ..,
, ........
..„
11 ': ----:-::-.--- 11 ---:
.... .,....„ ..:., -..,
.., --,..e.... .,-..... . . . .._•
....
I
:I: ,,....... ..._ ..." . I ,._•-e.-..
L.. ".. ••-.. I
i .......••••:\ ..
... .
- ... "Y.._ • ...9‘..
• . ---1- 9. ... , II 11 i,
. ...-- . .-..
.1...-----1--
- •''' , .... ,
1
...-.
•
•
.,..--'
...:' ../ ..• 1
. 1
.. .._.• - .
, - • •
i „ ... .. .. . .
_
,-..
--- , - - - ....- ' 1 .. .
./ ..e.....'
. ,, . ..•
i . .
'..1,..
'. -
r•-'il •
.•,
•
••...
,
..1
•-•• ..‘
• r -
‘..: .X. ......
... ...\.\ '•:.•.... •• --. .•-•
-=-_-,
•'
-„..
.. ...a
..... -... I
.-....
...... %.
•-.. i ••• I •
- \ •• •.•
..........•
.......
••• \..:\
......
.•i
..
I
i /..•••• I
....e •
......../. , ,
/.// •••-•..'•-•• r.
...--•--.' .1: ..... / '',•••••••-....
. 1 V
4....-' ..• •---, \.. .... i • 1 rl
.............. . .,_. -
C••_7_73
_
..- .
1....S-
re --••
..•-•••-.. .. • .••••• .......ea ..• ....._1 ... I • '...
. • •• .. .... .- • c,.... II. 4-..1 '. '.. ••
• .-
1 I 11 •-''' 1
I. l• .
•••••. •-•• '....''.3. .'.< •••• .--..
•--_ _
e..,
. --... .
I. I .-- --...- •, ...•
I i . i I V.T.2••-•.". ill \ •••• % ..... 1 '',. 4.. '.:''.../,/ ...I• '.. 1 ...---• 1••• ...../
TO. I I 4,•••••••-•• ---.- f. ....
\ \••(' ....- :-.. ,-.. •,. 75 ,
: -,.„..... 4, \ .• \ .... . • j\ -.,.. 1. -... , ....
I J .....-'..-.. ... 1', ,
( .., , ; .. ....7..z...... r .1' ,: i' .„. '- •- .1 ••.•:.;I.- 9... .. .
./.../ • ; .1.10 .1... r. I •• • I I I I I• .. .
i• . I '....--,_
i . /... .-./ i .V, .' '.'‘ i. . -75 _ , '!I ; ..I,•'..... ., I . \ ..
• \‘‘'....:•••-.‘..1:•‘:::...... ..- ...4,7./..„. •
, . I ..• •
• r..•
e--,----- , • ..--.
• .-.. _...2 e .1 ..-% .. I :••
•. ri ::).ile 1 1 'I f I. ' I.. - "•.... •
c
( ...--_.-...... ......." 1.7.... ...,
1 II '''''. I I ;..r...... I I (- 1 J 1 - 1 ,- ,•r_.-,..,
_ .. .... I'
'')
.
• . •Z 'r,. 1 , 1 . . ' 1: 1.- I%'‘'
.......
• . ,I, 1 ii111,11 /7'. •-• - ---
1 / 1.... If ( -••••••:,\.- -.-----"-----75 .
T21
.. •_._ .. „., . .1'
.•-• -••• .. ...__. •-•-. ,
i , •• ......-
-.- .4. (4 .. 100 % ••••"t4... ••••:...••• •-••-.
•• .. ‘,.....,- -,. 1 1 .
I •-:‘ ....5. ':•-•-. ,. ..... ..\.. r.:. / ... ; .!.I' I ..--",4 ; ._.-,... ....:''.:•••••••/
', ....-......- .-- ...--1.-...-;,-. ...• ....... I... •••••-. .- -- % ' i
•
•--,. .. .1 C... ./.11.1 i .: .... ... •••::::••2
•
.a- -- ,••-•- ----..--....•••. - ...
i
.,.
•-• 1 n\ Lf....1;--j. --.--I .,Ae. Legend
••• -•-•• ...•••
_ .--__„. „.-,. .):}. -z.;-2•:-(-47-4;-givi er•.--.,• -• \, I . .:: : .•
, -., .... ,... ......, ....... ...... •.
i '' 1 :I.:, . .-...: ..:•::...74...<0
) II i
.. „.__.‘ __ -__ ) .„............,_::.,.... ,(.., ......-.... 75--..:......:.--.. -- ......- - [ q Parcel Boundary...„. ...... •„ , ..1 . r.,. . .- .• •.
- . .....
I ..r../.- %..I N. P- '.• ----- ---•\ ..... . : '•• /../
• ../..,'..... j 1 1...: . .
.....:-7... . ../
OID .
. 1 . . . --.. ... ..)- _ .
....-•.:::..-...,...., ...7'•-•.:...-•.' ' ...."
•...:-....i..Th 1 )
1 "'..., \% I %) ...' 1..'i _-..7.;;;;;--•,. . Conservation Easement 14.9 acres
•
...... .. .:.) 1:•.:::•,', .1 ..-. ..--'... ----:.:=7_::y -..e./...._.. __r...._...... ..... ... ..•••• •••••••/--....:••••-7- ::-..;7L'..,=z7.. .. ih.'.. ../--.-e.</:' / ll. ' ••
.
•• ' I 1 1.:'''. C-.....' • / 1... ....
- •• / I i ,...1, :....
• . • ..-..
I I: ..•• I., .%k•::'17;1.....::::.: .. :..., ...I ........•.. ..1 •••. .• .
17 •;'.•• . .
1... 1....
• ..• 1 .... ....--•••:..• ...• •••''' •-... %.... ''''''..'''.7T. -‘•••'•..''... .... .
..__. . ..e.' . ...• .-. % ••• ••••\ .....\. •-•..... .....-:.----___ .......". ••••. . •••••• / - • . 9.. •
..-... .: •• :---=-9.•.. ..‘;'• ....•••••••••• ..
I . •••••• ij , ..
.
. ..
__. •, .••••-• ••----• .- .
e • •
..... ...e .--.
. . ',.....• ••••:'... ' ..':••••••:'-1
' \ • ...--.%',._ ''' 1 ....' '
• .
••
'.. : .--.'',.• .". -./. ..----- .----...•‘‘:-...‘,... ......-.---' ...- r
• ••-.. .k.
Vicinity Map
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site _
00 ........_1. .
,I
Annual Monitoring Report (MY1)
N
Tar-Pamlico 03020101
1,200 600 0 1,200
F
P .0 hb Edgecombe County, North CarolinaFigure
ecokerra. V December 2020 Feet 1
2013 Hartsease USGS Quadrangle

IIP.
_- � - . _ - Legend
_ -` ,�► + Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 1
r
- AY.. J - - - - - Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 1
-T it - - Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
- - - ' . ' • Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
-
_ F "_ r_ \O• Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 2 Reach 2b
r _- = _ -- - Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 2 Reach 2b
_ S UT 1 (At Least Intermittent)
a S UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
- so UT 2 Reach 2b (At Least Intermittent)
• -1114 ik *FP ,...7 ,A -
1,4 4•4•••••4"A 0,or...- V -.•- -
fir. `g t 'F �-+ . .,�-__ TM_ +F i 0
. f h�
iit . .
- i* ." i
L
I •• '
faii..i\ip .
.:W- iiii
- god:lagt EtGattaite,Ca.eorEye,artheler CC o greptilcc,014E8/Alr t Cs,u t D' u sCs,AN-0_0 1 ,ION,i r'ic the 018 Liee-r Cotht iLrilty
Project Component/Asset Map
00 `o
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site —
Annual Monitoring Report (MY1) N
.' 6 Tar-Pamlico 03020101 200 10 200 Figure
il
be County, North Carolina 2
aco t
Edgecombervl,uiDecember 2020 0 Feet
2017 Aerial from NCOneMap —

4_, ,
Legend Origin Latitude/Longitude (Decimal Degrees)
Plot Number Y Coordinate X Coordinate
• Vegetation Plot (N=12) Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 1 1 35.96294899 -77.70073591
2 35.96341822 -77.70147906
Photo Points Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 1
3 35.96396443 -77.70243013
I. Conservation Easement 14.9 acres Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral) - 4 35.964284 -77.70433461
milsib UT 1 (At Least Intermittent) di Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral) _ " 5 35.96448024 -77.70544498
6 35.96394198 -77.70670793
'�'�'� Buffer Restoration (0
-100')UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral) •:•:. UT 2 Reach 2b
7 35.96322236 -77.7070397
UT 2 Reach 2b (At Least Intermittent) ■ Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 2 Reach 2b 8 35.96440173 -77.70664643
9 35.96480553 -77.70528385
10 35.96433174 -77.70271205
11 35.96408549 -77.70191544
17121711. o G 12 35.9635377 -77.70111746
, -, , • Pp 90 ;,.,,;r, ,
s.
Note: Vegetation Plot photos are from the origin
_ .wr..:,_ k5:'r 111110 ....
17P 99 of the vegetation plot. The origin is located in the 40 ,E
M1 ' � 4 . southwest corner of each plot. ! 12
• 0 4 90 it • s _ 4
:"-k 4 �
: z�_ a� 3
1 e
.S�
W RV -
p g
" mow.- _ o' w '.
'41121-1011.
-_�'" x - - " - .ter'
Oft,' t'
• --- © PVoirC@optpkbo�rc c�,
Monitoring Plan View Map
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site —
VIO `+, Annual Monitoring Report (MY1) N
ill
' Tar-Pamlico 03020101
lb Feet 200 100 200 Figure
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
3
ago terraiiIi December 2020
2017 Aerial from NCOneMap —

Table 1: Buffer Project Attributes
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
Monitoring Year 1 —2020
, Project Name Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
I Hydrologic Unit Code 03020101
IRiver Basin . Tar-Pamlico
IGeographic Location (decimal degrees) 35.96451, -77.705926
LSite Protection Instrument(BK,PG) 1707/675
IIMER4M.4163U 617,518.702
T Types of CreditsMERiparian Buffer
.411M
Mitigation Plan Date 1=11= January 2020
!'Initial Planting Date iM= March 2020
Baseline Report Date May 2020
r1 Report Date December 2020
TMY2 Report Date December 2021
LY3 Report Date December 2022
rMY 4 Report Date December 2023
MY 5 Report Date December 2024
rse out Report Date/Visit May 2025

Table 2:Buffer Project Components and Assets
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
Monitoring Year 1 —2020
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE,PROJECT NO.2019-0800,617,518.702 CREDITS
Tar-Pamlico 03020101 Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft'/pound)
297.54099 P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft'/pound)
Subject?(enter
Total(Creditable) Convertible to Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Convertible to Riparian Buffer
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(ft') Area of Buffer %Full Credit Nutrient Nutrient Offset: Nutrient Offset:
ephemeral or Width(ft) Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Riparian Buffer? Credits
ditch') Mitigation(ft') Offset? N(Ibs) P(Ibs)
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 UT1 484,072 484,072 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 484,072.000 N/A 0.000 0.000
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 UT1 6,496 6,496 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 2,143.682 N/A 0.000 0.000
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 UT2(Reach 2a) 78,631 78,631 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 78,631.000 N/A 0.000 0.000
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 UT2(Reach 2a) 82 82 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 27.060 N/A 0.000 0.000
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 UT2(Reach 26) 52,641 52,641 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 52,641.000 N/A 0.000 0.000
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 UT2(Reach 26) 12 12 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 3.960 N/A 0.000 0.000
Totals: 621,934 621,934
Enter Preservation Credits Below Eligible for Preservation(ft'): 207,311
—
Total(Creditable) —
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Credits
Mitigation(ft')
Buffer Preservation —
Preservation Area Subtotal(ft'): 0
Preservation as%Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0% TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Ephemeral Reaches as%Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 12.7% Mitigation Totals Square Feet
Restoration: 621,934 617,518.702
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 0 0.000
Total Riparian Buffer: 621,934 617,518.702
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Nitrogen: 0 0.000
1.The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 0213.0250(5)(a). Offset: Phosphorus: 0.000
last updated 01/17/2020

APPENDIX 2
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo-Points
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No.100119
DWR Project No.2019-0800
Photo Location Baseline 2020 MY1 2020
Pp1 N. H Ne ..00
♦039°NE IT)•13557'45'N.77.42'1"V1_19!I a 64 ft O28'NE IT)•35.962673°.-77-700375'-t13fI■651[
•
} :,�
Pp2 W NW N NE W NW N NI
O 35S'N(T)•35°5T4$"N,7.42'7`W=13ft■Gift 0347'N M*35.965545',-77-702038'_131t A 54ft
•
•
�iy w:�f+q 'm f,ett r...:•I .: d+SFJn'W..jl r�•TY� �.r -t a0-Ncs.,iv.5AV
Pp3 NW N I NE E
•.1-08°N 1T)•35.57'50"N,77°4212"W x35R a 63ft o 91.E 1TI•35.4640306,-77.705682-113ft a 6211
•
•
..... ... ..-... ,r-2P2P.20,O.el iB
Pp4 W N:•r N YE - W NW wl N NE
0356°N1T)f55•57'51"N,77.42'21"W x26ft■61fi 0335"NV..(TI .35964212°.-777O5970°t451t►62ft.I'
�• �'.. �v.'T� .r �v .�.'.1 i STP .i .2?0„2vo-ze

Photo Location Baseline 2020 MY1 2020
Pp5 5 SW '! NW N Sw NW N
• I' ♦ r
0269°W IT) •35°57'49"N,77°42'21-W x1 3ft■54f1 ' 0274•W{T)•35.96.3647•,-77,706041'x66ft A 6511 '.
Pp6 • N I NE E ri NW I N vE
1 1 035•NE(T)-■35°57.46-N,77°42.26"W=13f1•6■ �1r •'.'o 347•N in 4 35.962982•--77.707294•a3611 466f1
Aik
-Y.T,.t -
.,1 S2
Pp7 N NE I E SE N ... , E SE
3.
O B1°E{T)r.35°5750,N,77.42'26"W x13R■611t 083•E(T)fl••35.963895•,-77.707374•t32tl A 62ft
11.11111111111111111
wow..
1,e�:tan.,2:•5.0
ppg E SE S SW
0136•S {T3)• 5°57-54' = a G N,77`42'28"W13f1 911 .1.10147.5E 4T;)�•3�5.9$5�041',-77.707922-t 32f1■67f1
�l
f

Photo Location Baseline 2020 MY1 2020
Pp9 F •se S -. SW W NW N
IT!•3`0167°S �S7'S3"N,77°42.20"W x16f1■64f - 0293•NW(TV•35964979',-77.705710•S26ft■64ft
Mae 11,1
Pp10 S W s, S I SW W
O 195'S R1 0 35'575214,77'4213"W x1611 a 60ft O 192•S 1T1 S'35,964595*,,-77.70358.3•_721t a 62ft
7i y
Pp11 F. SE I$. $ S.'I W N:•+
0174•S IT1•35.57-51"N,77•42'S"W x264■65ft 0229'SW R1'•P 35.964350',-77,701961.313ft►eat
F- - .—t-l...-.--
- a mt+Mvt m.n-. ec..
+'•.A•bx`.rq w(nGrx "' ;!!!zIXSu.,.'•. STP p-2•-2026....,0%
Pp12 Sw W I NW N SW W NW N
!-'.10284°W IT] •35°57'96"N,77.42-1-W x 22ft■63ft t 027?''W iTi •35.963416°.-77.700522°2 2ft al631I

APPENDIX 3
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS

Monitoring Plots
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No.100119
DWR Project No.2019-0800
Photo Location Baseline 2020 MY1 2020
MP1 NW N Iu= E
•.
031'NE(T5•35`5746"N,77.42'2"W x16f1■649 025°NE{T5■35.962985.,-77.700758°!13lt A64f5
r-f
1
11
ytl..a y:14''. .Aga'
MP2 ... N rI NE E m N N: S E SE
,0 NE(T)!35.57'4B"N,77.42'5"W x76f1•628 ' 1'1 O47°NE ITI •35.063427..34 .77701475.±138■61ft
' fir
•
-
MP3 her; N • I NE • E hN; N NE E
0 38'7JE(T)•35`57'50"N,77.426"W x22lt•618 0 9.N{T5'•35-963980•,-77.702434.1.16fe■61ft •'
I.
- -- _ - _ -
,,��� >: �: ram- �•m. �_ �, ,
-- '-- 7-d.: 1sa ez .�
MP4 NW N IIE E s= •'- NW N Ir. E
• O44°NE(T5•35.67 51"N•77.42'15"W 213ft•61f1 o29•NE CD•35.9E4316.-77704332••13it■608
I:.

Photo Location Baseline 2020 MY1 2020
MP5 NW N taG E
0 371-1E 0)•35.5252-N,77'4719-W x39ft►62ft •' 0 29-NE It)*35.8645231.-7?705.122.1-1611■62-ft
•
•
•
MP6
028°NE tT1•35.57-5O"N,77.42'23"W 4299■61ft 018.N(T)•35.963946.,-77.706793•_22ft►62f1
•
•
Mn.: - •
xw Weie...,n Se,ti..t .W . !.,nvztao.],12,,2 Elf. .i,...... ...-.
MP7 Nvr N I NE E NW H Ile E 6:
•
•ID 38°NE(Tl•35`57'47"N,77.42'25'W x25211■249 0 44.NE IT}•35.963227.,-77.707044.}52ft a 659
•
L. ..' ryµ i: ti'X -ter .. • e.�'-•• zo-zmu,xs"
46
MP8 NW N NE E
041.NE IT)•35 5?-51"N,77.42'23-W x191,■58,, 0251-1E ttl•35-964438..-77.706639.x32ft■599
•

Photo Location Baseline 2020 MY1 2020
MP9 ... N E .. H NE E 5!.
047'NE(T)•35•57'53"N,77'42'1S"W 213ft•61ft 0 53'NE ITI •35.964803-.-77.705293-k1911■63f[
•
MP10 N ... E SE H NI: I E S
p -48'NE(T}9q 35.5751"N,77.42'9'e_22ft■63ft O 56'NE(TI•36.964364•,-77.702717.-413f1•64t
•
• (.5 R •
MP11 NW N iJE E s. N v_ E
'- O 42-NE(T(9L 35•57'60N.77-A25"'5Y,68ft•63ft • IO 35•NE(TI•35.964094',77.701901'1.13t•62ft
•
. •.. • / 11.arvm10.14 36.3
MP12 rnv N •J= E •J:•. N Ne E
. 1 •O 3844E(T(�i 35'57'48"N,77.42'3•W x13t•6111 ' 030•NE(T)OE 36.963535..-77-701130•-416ft•6211
h
•
•
•
•
.a - .• 3-

Table 3:Planted and Total Stems
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
Monitoring Year 1 2020
Current Plot Data(MY-1 2020)-Total Stems Annual Means
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type MP1 MP2 MP3 MP4 MPS MP6 MP7 MP8 MP9 MP10 MP11 MP12 MY1 MY0
Cephalanthus occidentalis butonbush Shrub
Corn us amomum silky dogwood Tree 7 4 2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2
Nyssa sylvatica var.aquatic swamp blackgum Tree 1 5
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree 3 1 2 2 5 2 1 1
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 4 9 4 6 4 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 7 1 4 1 2 4 2 1
Quercus pagoda cherry bark oak Tree 11 1
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 3 2 1 9 5 4 5 6 8 11
Stem Count 16 16 10 11 9 15 18 12 14 12 12 13 13 16
Species# 3 5 3 3 2 3 5 4 4 3 4 3
Vigor 3.5 2 2.7 3.7 3.8 3.3 3.6 3.3 3 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.8
Stems/ac 647 647 405 445 364 607 728 486 567 i486 . 486 47
Annual Summary _ _
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Total Exceeds criteria(260 stems/ac)by 10%
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree 24 Exceeds criteria(260 stems/ac),but by less than 10%
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 20 Fails to meet criteria(260 stems/ac),by less than 10%
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 27 Fails to meet criteria(260 stems/ac)by mo _
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 61 Plot Size(ares/ac): 1/0.0247
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 4
Corn us amomum silky dogwood Tree 16
Cephalanthus occidentalis butonbush Shrub 0
Nyssa sylvatica var.biflora swamp blackgum Tree 5
Quercus pagoda cherry bark oak Tree 1
Total Stems 158
Species# 8
Avg Vigor 3.3
Total Stems/ac _

Sitey��- MY! Aerial (October, 2020)
..ti. t fit. _
.-.. ,h:j:. 'i••:.+,• V:!.. .1 .1�'ors.." '':: f 4r8
-
■'r• _
r.; '• ' ': `„ u ,0 1`1? . =iFrr r.l r.^_=i'i=.���ff4 'da ` 1 ,.. r • Y4 ` •ra-c`l..# P ,W"R• Y ,,w',•.. .5 i•..o t.
lei C 1 �..' l7. -
- 4—,, _ • -
_ � .-^ _ '+•a
• •�Z�7y' J �..f"' _ Fes..[. fikV.." - .,-2`-- _ - - -_ 1
fi ' � 3� t _ 'sl .
+` .- - -Y ` - 1
L.
. Ir:(, ., .
-
•
.:a:i.4
West Project Side

,fiit .. --,.:-,:: ,—...--- -:,-...---. ._-_-_.
r : .:.::.
`I
•
a.r
•
14
•
Ilis
•
•
c '� ' w Y ram••` - .
•
k r•4 5t4.ti"# .tr .1. •- �•..
•
East Project Side