NC0063932_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

Performance Annual Repo
General Information
Facility/System Name White Forest
NC DEN!
DWQ.WSurf(e
Responsible Entity: White Forest WWT Trust
Person in Charge/Contact: Aqua North Carolina, Inc. is contract operator
Applicable Permit (s): NC0063932
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
This 0.017 mgd wastewater treatment facility consists of a bar screen,
aeration tank, clarifier, aerated sludge holding tank and chlorination, and
de -chlorination.
II. Performance
Text Summary of System Performance for Calendar Year 2007:
The plant generally performed well and met all effluent limits
Aqua discontinued operation of the plant in October 2007
List (by month) any violations of permit conditions
regulations. Monthly lists should include discussion of any environmen
impacts and corrective measures taken to address violations.
IC
D E N R- WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
fl

January rCompliant
February Compliant
March Compliant
April Compliant
May Compliant
June Compliant
July Compliant
August Compliant
September Compliant
III. Notification
The system owner was mailed a copy of this Annual Report to be made
available to the customers of White Forest. A copy of this report is also
available in Aqua, North Carolina's Customer Service office.
IV. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the
best of my knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available
to the users or customers of the named system and that those users have been
notified of its availability.
�e�'�Ct�1IcNj Date:
Responsible Person
Title: Regional Manager, Engineering & Compliance
Entity: Aqua North Carolina dba Heater Utilities, Inc.

Performance Annual ReportB
General Jnformation
Facility/System Name White Forest
Responsible Entity: White Forest Trust
Person in Charge/Contact: Aqua North Carolina, Inc. is contract operator
Applicable Pennnit (s): NC0063932
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
This 0.017 mgd wastewater treatment facility consists of a bar screen,
aeration tank, clarifier, aerated sludge holding tank and chlorination. In order to
comply with new permit limits for residual chlorine, a tablet dechlorination unit
was installed May 30, 2006.
II Performance
Text Summary of System Performance for Calendar Year 2006:
The new residual chlorine permit limit became effective on January 1, 2006.
The new limit was exceeded until the dechlorination equipment was
installed. This resulted in the issuance of (2) notices of violation from the
Division of Water Quality. There was also (1) total suspended solid (TSS)
exceedance.

List (by mon
regulations.
impacts and
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
th) any violations of permit conditions or other environmental
Monthly lists should include discussion of any environmental
corrective measures taken to address violations.
The residual chlorine limit of 28 ug/1 was exceeded on 9
occasions with results ranging from 500 ug/1 to 1900 ug/l.
The residual chlorine limit of 28 ug/1 was exceeded on 7
occasions with results ranging from 800 ug/1 to 1900 ug/1
The residual chlorine limit of 28
was exceeded on 10
occasions with results ranging from 1250 ug/1 to 1950 ug/1
The residual chlorine limit of 28 ug/1 was exceeded on 8
occasions with results ranging from 1110 ug/1 to 1920 ug/l.
NC Division of Water Quality issued a Notice of Violation and
assessment of civil penalty for the (9) residual chlorine
exceedances in January 2006.
The residual chlorine limit of 28 ug/1 was exceeded on 8
occasions with results ranging from 650 ug/1 to 1950 ug/1
A tablet dechiorination unit was installed May 30, 2006.
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
The TSS result of 46 mg11 exceeded the permitted daily allowable
limit of 45 mg/l.
NC Division of Water Quality issued a Notice of Violation for
failure to obtain an Authorization to Construct permit prior to
installing the dechiorination unit in May 2006.
Compliant

November Compliant
December Compliant
III. Notification
The system owner was mailed a copy of this Annual Report to be made
available to the customers of White Forest. A copy of this report is also
available in Aqua, North Carolina's Customer Service office.
IV. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the
best of my knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available
to the users or customers of the named system and that those users have been
notified of its availability.
Date: 02/07/07
Responsible Person
Title: Regional Manager, Engineering & Compliance
Entity: Aqua North Carolina, Inc.

JA_
North Carolina
August 15, 2007
Department of Environmental Health
ATTN: Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue,
Mooresville, NC 28115
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, NC 28037
RE: Termination Contract Operations
Silverton —Water and Wastewater (PWSID 01-13-219)
White Forest — Wastewater (NPDES NC0063932)
T: 704.489.9401
F: 704.489.9409
www.aquanorthcarolina.com
Effective 11:59 PM on Friday, September 14, 2007, Aqua North Carolina, Inc. will
terminate contract operations for the Silverton water and wastewater systems
and the White Forest wastewater system. Pace Utilities (Silverton) and White
Forest WVVf Trust (White Forest) have been notified via United Parcel Service
and facsimile.
Should you have any questions, or need clarification, please feel free to contact
us at 704-489-9404.
Thank you,
Gary Moseley
Western Regional Manager
GRM/pp
Enc
C: Tom Roberts, President, Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Tony Parker, Area Manager, Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
An Aqua America Company

UA.
North Carolina
August 15, 2007
DENR
Division of Water Quality
ATTN: Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, NC 28037
RE: Termination Contract Operations
Silverton — Water and Wastewater (PWSID 01-13-219)
White Forest — Wastewater (NPDES NC0063932)
T. 704.489,9401
F: 704,489,9409
www,aquanorthcarolina.com
Effective 11:59 PM on Aqua North Carolina, Inc. will
terminate contract operations for the Silverton water and wastewater systems
and the White Forest wastewater system. Pace Utilities (Silverton) and White
Forest WVVT Trust (White Forest) have been notified via United Parcel Service
and facsimile.
Should you have any questions, or need clarification, please feel free to contact
us at 704-489-9404.
Gary Moseley
Westem Regional Manager
GRM/pp
Enc
C: Tom Roberts, President, Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Tony Parker, Area Manager, Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
An Aqua America Company

Michael F. Easley, Govern
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Caro na Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 6, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7006 2760 0001 8493 0591
Mr. H. E. Mullis
8033 Hood Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28215
Subject: Notice of Violation - Effluent Limitation
Tracking #: NOV-2007-LV-0084
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
A review of the September 2006 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a
violation of the following parameter for Outfall 001:
Date Parameter Reported Value
9/5/06 Total suspended solids 46 mg/1
Permit Limit
45 mg/I (Daily maximum
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems.
Since the comments section on the reverse of the relevant Discharge Monitoring Report provided
an explanation for the noted effluent limit violation, it is not requested that a response be
submitted; however, should you have additional information concerning the violations or
comments which you wish to present, please submit them to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco.
The Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any
additional violations. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or
maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to
consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. You may contact Ms. Allocco of this Office
for additional information.
AT 'A
NCDENR
On
Nrararaollii;a
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaternuality.org, 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. H. E. Mullis
February 6, 2007
N©V-2007-LV-0084
Page 2
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms.
Allocco or me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
Michael Parker
Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
cc: Point Source Branch
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
MA

Michael F. Easley,
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 17, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7003 2260 0001 3494 8919
H. E. Mullis
8033 Hood Road
Charlotte, NC 28215
Subject: Permit Rescission Process
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
Alan W. Klimek, P„E, Director
Division of Water Quality
It is our understanding, based upon prior communication with you and from the content of your
September 18 letter to the North Carolina Utilities Commission, that when municipal sewer service
becomes available to your area you intend to cease operation of the White Forest WWTP. It is our
further understanding that Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities (C-MU) has initiated actions to provide
wastewater service to the area treated by the White Forest WWTP. C-MU has informed this Office that,
by its best estimation, the sewer extension project will not be completed until April 2007.
The Division of Water Quality is supportive of all parties' efforts to facilitate the elimination of the
White Forest WWTP discharge and wishes to assist you as you work toward that goal. However, while
the White Forest WWTP remains in operation, the Division of Water Quality expects that all
requirements of the subject permit will be met. To that end, the following is a summary of items you
should be aware of as you approach the closing of the facility.
Part III, Section E of the White Forest NPDES permit lists the following requirements for facility
closure. "The permittee must notify the Division at least 90 days prior to the closure of any
wastewater treatment system covered by the permit. The Division may require specific measures
during deactivation of the system to prevent adverse impacts to waters of the State." The details of
such "specific measures" are determined by the characteristics of the individual facility. In this case,
they must be established through coordination with the Surface Water Protection Section staff of the
Mooresville Regional Office. Although the extent of the measures has yet to be determined, it is
certain they will include removal and proper disposal of all wastewater and sludge at the facility.
• After all flow has been diverted to the C-MU system and the White Forest WWTP has been
satisfactorily deactivated, you should request that the NPDES permit be rescinded. Your request for
permit rescission should be directed to the Division of Water Quality, which is the permitting agency
and the only entity having authority to rescind the permit. Your request should not be made to the
North Carolina Utilities Commission.
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Internet: www,610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
N Caro ina
Naturally
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirrnative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. H. E. Mullis
Page 2
November 17, 2006
Your rescission request should be sent to:
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 — 1617
Please be advised the above is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of actions you will need to take, but
a general description of activities you will need to be aware of as you make future plans. With proper
coordination and directed action, this should be a relatively simple process. We look forward to working
with you in this effort. You are reminded again, however, that until the facility is decommissioned and
the permit rescinded, you are responsible for complying with all monitoring, reporting and operational
requirements contained in the NPDES permit.
If you have any questions, you may contact Ms. Marcia Allocco in the Mooresville Regional Office at
[phone] or Mr. Bob Sledge with the NPDES Unit in Raleigh at [phone], extension 547.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker
Surface Water Protection
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Mike Meyers Aqua North Carolina, Inc., Compliance and Engineering Manager
P© Box 4889, Cary, NC 27519

Michael F. Easley. Governor
William G. Ross Jr-, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 11, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 0500 0002 6814 3755
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Gene Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
116-J Freeland Lane
Charlotte, NC 28217
SUBJECT: Final Notice - Delinquent Annual Fee
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Q.ual(tty„
OCT 1
All NPDES permittees must pay an Annual Compliance Monitoring Fee. The fee requirement is
documented in your current permit at Part II. B. 14. Your annual fees for the periods February 1, 2005 —
January 31, 2006 and February 1, 2006 — January 31, 2007 have not been paid. The amount owed is
$1,430.00 ($715.00 for each year); copies of the invoices previously sent by the Division's Budget
Office are attached.
Failure to pay the annual fee is grounds for revocation of your permit, as documented in part II.
B. 13 and II. B. 14. This matter must be promptly resolved.
This letter serves as final notice that the Division will refer the fee[s] noted above to the North Carolina
Attorney General's Office for collection through the courts unless payment in the amount of $2,865.00 is
received by November 1, 2006. Make checks payable to NC DENR; include the permit number[s] for
which you are submitting payment on the check.
If you have evidence that the fee has already been paid, please contact me by phone at [phone],
extension 547 or via e-mail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
-erf-
Robert L. Sledge
Western NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
NPDES File
Mooresville Regional Office — SWP Section
DWQ Budget Office - Fran McPherson
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
No Carolina
�turalr/!f
Customer Service
1-877-623-67481

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INVOICE
Annual Permit Fee
200 PR00229 9
Overdue
This annual fee is required by the North Carolina Administrative Code, It covers the administrative costs associated with your
permit. It is required of any person holding a permit for any time during the annual fee period, regardless of the facility's operating
status. Failure to pay the fee by the due date will subject the permit to revocation. Operating without a valid permit is a violation
and is subject to a S10,000 per day fine, If the permit is revoked and you later decide a permit is needed, you must reapply, with the
understanding the permit request may be denied due to changes in environmental, regulatory, or modeling conditions.
Permit Number: NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
White Forest WWTP
Gene Mullis
White Forest VVVVT Trust
116-J Freeland Ln
Charlotte, NC 28217
Annual Fee Period: 2005-02-01 to 2006-01-31
Invoice Date: 03/17/05
Due Date: 04/16/05
Annual Fee: $715.00
Notes:
1. A $25.00 processing fee will be charged for returned checks in accordance with the North Carolina General Statute 25-3-512.
2. Non -Payment of this fee by the payment due date will initiate the permit revocation process.
3. Remit payment to:
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
4. Should you have any questions regarding this invoice, please corntact the Annual Administering and Compliance Fee Coordinator at
919-733-5083 extension 210
(Return This Portion With Check)
ANNUAL PERMIT INVOICE
005PR002299
Overdue
Permit Number: NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
White Forest WWTP
Gene Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
116-J Freeland Ln
Charlotte, NC 28217
Annual Fee Period: 2005-02-01 to 2006-01-31
Invoice Date: 03/17/05
Due Date: 04/16/05
Annual Fee: $715A00
Check Number:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INVOICE
Annual Permit Fee
2 0 6 PROO 2 6 6 9
Overdue
This annual fee is required by the North Carolina Administrative Code. It covers the administrative costs associated with your
permit. It is required of any person holding a permit for any time during the annual fee period, regardless of the facility's operating
status. Failure to pay the fee by the due date will subject the permit to revocation. Operating without a valid permit is a violation
and is subject to a $10,000 per day fine, If the permit is revoked and you later decide a permit is needed, you must reapply, with the
understanding the permit request may be denied due to changes in environmental, regulatory, or modeling conditions.
Permit Number: NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
White Forest WWTP
Gene Mullis
White Forest VVWT Trust
116-J Freeland Ln
Charlotte, NC 28217
Annual Fee Period: 2006-02-01 to 2007-01-31
Invoice Date: 03/16/06
Due Date: 04/15/06
Annual Fee: $715,00
Notes:
1. A $25.00 processing fee will be charged for returned checks in accordance with the North Carolina General Statute 25-3-512.
2. Non -Payment of this fee by the payment due date will initiate the permit revocation process.
3. Remit payment to:
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
4. Should you have any questions regarding this invoice, please contact the Annual Administering and Compliance Fee Coordinator at
919-733-5083 extension 210
(Return This Portion With Check)
ANNUAL PERMIT INVOICE
2006PR0 2669
Overdue
Permit Number: NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
White Forest WWTP
Gene Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
116-J Freeland Ln
Charlotte, NC 28217
Annual Fee Period: 2006-02-01 to 2007-01-31
Invoice Date: 03/16/06
Due Date: 04/15/06
Annual Fee: $715.00
Check Number:

Michael F. Easley, Gove
0
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 13, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7003 2260 0001 3494 8278
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking #: NOV-2006-PC-0379
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On August 10, 2006, Mr. Christopher Elmore of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCWQP), along with Marcia Allocco and Donna Hood of the North Carolina DENR
Division of Water Quality, conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because of the numerous
monitoring violations of the subject NPDES permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.)
143-215.1 as detailed in the Permit and Self -Monitoring Program sections of the attached
report. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more the twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000) per violation per day may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in
accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S.
143-215.1
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by no later than
October 12, 2006, addressing the deficiencies noted in the Permit and Self -Monitoring Program
sections of the report. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Ms.
Marcia Allocco.
At
DE
N Carolina
�turalfy
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: w yw.ncwaterqualitv.or; 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10%a Post Consumer Paper

Mr. H. E. Mullis
Page 2
September 13, 2006
During the inspection the peiiiiittee disclosed that Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities (C-
MU) had initiated actions to provide wastewater service to the area treated by the White Forest
WWTP. A follow-up call to C-MU indicated this process would not be completed before
approximately April 2007. Once all flow has been diverted from the White Forest WWTP to the
C-MU system the peuiiittee needs to ensure that permit NC0063932 is rescinded.
Part III, Section E of NC0063932 lists the requirements for facility closure. The
permittee must notify the Division at least 90 days prior to the closure of any wastewater
treatment system covered by the permit. In order to rescind a NPDES permit the facility owner
(or authorized representative) should send a letter including the permit number, name and
address of the facility, and reason for the rescission request to the NPDES Permitting and
Compliance Program at:
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 — 1617
The Division may require specific measures during deactivation of the system to prevent adverse
impacts to waters of the State. Deactivation activities shall include the removal and proper
disposal of all wastewater and sludge at the facility. The permit cannot be rescinded while any
activities requiring this peiinit continue at the permitted facility.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Ms. Marcia Allocco or me at this office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Neil Phillips President Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
700 N. Regional Rd., Greensboro, NC 27409
DRG/cfe/MA
FILE: White Forest.NC0063932.0806

Transaction
N
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Code
5
NC
Section A: National Data System Coding
NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY
NC0063932 06/08/10
Inspection
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
R Approval Expires
7/31/85
Inspector
Facility Type
2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating
1.0 2
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd.
Mecklenburg County, NC
BI
N
Section B: Facility Data
Name(s) of On -Site Representative / Title(s) / Phone No(s):
Kevin Curl / ORC / Aqua North Carolina, Inc. [phone]
Entry Time:
01:30 pm
Exit Time:
02:50 pm
Date:
August 10, 2006
QA
N
Permit Effective Date:
July 1, 2004
Permit Expiration Date:
November 30, 2008
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Eg Permit
Z Records/Reports
Z Facility Site Review
Z Effluent/Receiving Waters
Title:
Owner
Phone No.
[phone]
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Flow Measurement
LE Self -Monitoring Program
Ej Compliance Schedules
Z Laboratory
Z Operations & Maintenance
Sludge Handling/Disposal
Pretreatment Program
Stormwater
Contacted?
No
Z Sewer Overflow
O Pollution Prevention
El Multimedia
El Other:
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Christopher Elmore
Signature of Revi
Agency/OfficefTelephone:
MCWQP / [phone]
Agency/Office
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete
Date:
August 10, 2006
Date:
ID•• C‹,n7

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected by MCWQP on March 24, 2005. A Compliance
Evaluation Inspection Report was issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) on April 13, 2005.
PERMIT:
The previous permit became effective on January 1, 2001, and expired on November 30,
2003. The facility continued to operate under the previous permit requirements until June 30,
2004. A new permit was issued on July 1, 2004 and will expire November 30, 2008. A review
of the permit payment history indicates that the annual permit fee for NC0063932 has not been
paid for either 2005 or 2006.
The existing 0.017 MGD facility is an extended aeration package wastewater treatment
plant with a bar screen, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, sludge holding tank, tablet
chlorinator, and chlorine contact tank.
Mr. Kevin Curl was the Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) throughout the period of
review. Mr. Curl maintains a North Carolina Operators Certification Grade IV, which is
acceptable for the class of the facility. Mr. Curl's Certification Number is 9457.
The NPDES permit NC0063932 for White Forest WWTP was issued on June 15, 2004.
Part III, Section A requires that an Authorization to Construct (AtC) permit be issued before the
construction of wastewater treatment facilities. During the inspection, it was discovered that a
dechlorination system had been added to the White Forest WWTP immediately upstream of the
effluent outfall. This addition is not reflected in the current permit and has not been reviewed in
accordance with the approval procedure. Please provide the Mooresville Regional Office of
NCDENR documentation as to the type of dechlorination facilities installed.
During the inspection the permittee disclosed that Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities (C-
MU) had initiated actions to provide wastewater service to the area treated by the White Forest
P. A follow-up call to C-MU indicated this process would not be completed before
approximately April 2007. Once all flow has been diverted from the White Forest WWTP to the
C-MU system the permittee needs to ensure that permit NC0063932 is rescinded.
RATING: Unsatisfactory
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Marcia Allocco reviewed the Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) for the period
January 2005 through January 2006. Details of this review will be discussed in the Self -
Monitoring Program section of this report. Visitation and process control logbooks were
reviewed on -site. All reviewed records appeared to be complete.
RATING: Satisfactory

FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
All of the existing components of the facility were operational at the time of the
inspection. The clarifier appeared murky and pin floc was noted. This problem had been
observed during the previous inspections. During this inspection, the ORC stated that inflow and
infiltration (I&I) from recent storm events might have impacted the treatment system. The
discharge from the facility was clear during the time of the inspection.
RATING: Satisfactory
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
The ORC estimates the flow based on effluent head at the v-notch weir. A permanently
attached staff gauge has been installed at the v-notch in order to ensure accurate, repeatable
readings.
LABORATORY:
All compliance samples collected for analysis at the White Forest facility were submitted
to Water Tech Labs, Inc. (NC State Certification #50) in Granite Falls, NC. Water Tech Labs,
Inc. was not evaluated under this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to Reedy Creek, which is a Class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. The discharge from the facility was clear during the time of the inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period January 2005
through January 2006. The reports indicate that the facility was in compliance with monitoring
frequencies and peiniit effluent limits, as monitored during the review period with one exception.
An enforcement, LV-2006-0111, was issued in April 2006, for residual chlorine, daily maximum,
limit violations that occurred in January 2006. To date neither a response letter or penalty
payment has been received regarding the enforcement case.
The ORC indicated that some sampling was performed before the discharge point of the
system. Effluent sampling must be performed downstream of all treatment elements including
the newly installed dechlorination treatment system.
RATING: Unsatisfactory
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:

Visual observations of the clarifier over the past three annual inspections (2003, 2004,
2005) appear to suggest that there may be ongoing problems with the operation of the package
treatment system, possibly due to limited biomass or insufficient influent. However, the
facility's effluent was clear during the inspection and with the exception of one residual chlorine
limit violation, the facility has met all permit limits during the review period. You may contact
the Mooresville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality for additional guidance and
information if necessary.
RATING: Satisfactory
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL:
The ORC reports that no solids have been wasted from the facility during the previous 4
periods of review. Piedmont Septic Service of Rowan County is the contracted septage hauler
for this facility.
SEWER OVERFLOW:
Please be advised that pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPDES permit and North
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 2B .0506 (a)(2), any failure of a collection system,
pumping station or treatment facility resulting in a bypass without treatment of all or any portion
of the wastewater shall be reported to the appropriate regional office (Mooresville Regional
Office 704/663-1699) as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours from the time the permittee
becomes aware of the bypass. For spills/bypasses that occur in Mecklenburg County, it is
requested that MCWQP be notified at 704/336-5500. Spills occurring on weekends or holidays
can be reported by calling the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management at 800/662-
7956, 800/858-0368, or 919/733-3300. A written report shall also be provided within five (5)
days of the time of the incident. The report shall contain a description of the bypass, and its
cause; the period of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been
corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken (or planned) to reduce,
eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the similar events. Any spill that reaches surface waters (i.e.
any spill that reaches any water already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc.) or any spill
greater than 1,000 gallons on the ground that does not reach surface waters must be reported.
An adequate spill response for those spills reaching surface waters should include an
evaluation downstream of the point at which the spill entered surface waters to determine if a fish
kill occurred. The evaluation should also include the collection of upstream dissolved oxygen
and pH measurements for background information and dissolved oxygen and pH measurements
at multiple points downstream of the entry point to document any negative impact. Failure to
report the bypass of a collection system, pumping station, or treatment facility subjects violators
to penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation.

Telephone 704.566.055
10-10-06
White Forest Wastewater Treatment
Road
28215
Facsimile 704.567.2649
Mr. D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division dffWater Quality
610 East Center Ave.
Suite 301
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Subject: White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC 0063932
Response Letter
Tracking #: NOV-2006-PC-0379
Case No. LV-2006-0112
Case No. LV-2006-0166
Case No. LV-2006-0207
Case No. LV-2006-0294
Gentlemen:
I agree with your unsatisfactory rating and once again enter a request to immediately
abandon the White forest WWTP. It is not feasible to try to operate a WWTP for only
three people - who don't want it. Our water ways are much more precious than a few
homes which pose the opportunity for pollution.
The effluence which enters the White Forest WWTP is pretreated by septic tanks to a
grey water quality which should bring question to the logic of adding a dangerous
chemical such as chlorine; particularly when the flow of effluence is too low and too
sporadic to maintain a proper ug/l level. Then another chemical is needed to de -chlorinate
the effluence, but now we have the probability of increased TDS.
I suggest that the White Forest WWTP is caught -up in your ever -changing requirements
for facilities of much larger capabilities and should be singled out to be allowed to
operate by the requirements which have been sufficient for the past ten years.
I am enclosing my letter to the State of North. Carolina Utilities Commission requesting
to cease all operations and properly abandon all facilities offthe White Forest WWTP
and for the rescission of the NPDES permit NC0063932.

I am also enclosing a copy of the 2005 annual report which shows a negative operating
shortfall of $21,898.58: a surety of non-support by those who dump their waste water into
the White Forest system. That figure doesn't include my allowable wages of $12.30 per
week nor the $1.92 per week for all other expenses which go unpaid because the perfect
world of the Accounting Division has yet to be achieved.
As the temporary operator of a North Carolina Utility, I can see that I am completely
under your power.
What you say, you say.
What you do, you do. But there is seldom a match.
I can only charge what you tell me to charge. You have set my rates.
You have limited me to seven customers.
There is not a way to make-up for lost revenues nor is there a way to pass additional costs
and fees along to the customers: who are ultimately liable for all costs to provide them a
service of necessity. Along with an 8.5% return.
You haven't given your associates in Charlotte the information needed for me to properly
disconnect a non -payer in a way to insure non -pollution.
My four immigrant non -payers have realized how to flaunt your error.
Non-payment is the only reason for discontinuing service; but in this situation there is no
reasoning. Though you originally suggested abandoning a system with so small a
participation, now you suggest no way of abandonment but for an alternative system.
I am quite perplexed to be continuously working with these seven people in a way to
allow them their domicile through a bad situation propagated by others while the State of
North Carolina views me as a violator, while placing the whole burden of compliance to
changing laws upon me without any compensation.
It would be nice to see a benefit from what you do, but then, I guess you will do what you
will do.
Sincerely,
HE Mullis
White Forest WWTP

White Forest Wastewater Treatment
8033 Hood Road
Chablis, North Carona 72215
ne_704.566.0555 • Facsimie__ 704.567.2649
09-18-06
State of North Carolina Utilities Commission
4235 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-5325
Docket # W-1157
Attn: Ms. Castlebury
Gentlemen:
Noting that the White Forest WWTP is operating at a woeful deficit; attempting to
provide services to only seven customers of whom only three are making an effort to pay
for those services and that C-MUD is in the beginning stages of construction of a parallel
system designed to replace the White Forest WWTP:
I am requesting permission to immediately cease all operations and properly abandon all
facilities of the White Forest WWTP once flow has been diverted into the C-MUD
system.
I am also requesting rescission of the Nl'DES it N `.flti692.
I am also requesting permission to use all legal means available to an NC utility to inflict
upon those seven customers of White Forest WWTP: all related costs, permitting and
civil penalties pertaining to absolving the White Forest WWTP and it's owners, as well
as venues of forced collection procedures of past due amounts for services rendered such
as attachment of liens to affected properties.
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28215
704.634.7991

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
RALEIGH
DOCKET NO. W-1157, SUB 1
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
In the Matter of
Harold E. Mullis, d/b/a White Forest Wastewater ) ORDER
Treatment, 116-J Freeland Lane, Charlotte, North ) REQUIRING
Carolina 28217, for Authority to Cancel Franchise for ) CUSTOMER
Sewer Utility Service in White Forest Subdivision in ) NOTICE
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
BY THE COMMISSION: On September 18, 2006, Harold E. Mullis, d/b/a White
Forest Wastewater Treatment (Applicant), filed a letter with the Commission seeking
authority to discontinue sewer utility service in White Forest Subdivision in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina.
The Applicant provides service to seven customers. The Applicant's current rate
is $158 per month. Mr. Mullis and Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) have been
working together for over a year to finalize the plans to install a sewer main to provide
sewer utility service to White Forest Subdivision. Three customers have already applied
for sewer utility service with CMU.
CMU has notified the Public Staff that the project to install a sewer main to
provide sewer service to White Forest Subdivision is available for contract on
November 13, 2006. The expected completion date is March 31, 2007.
On August 29, 2006, CMU sent letters to the four remaining customers informing
them as to the cost to connect to the system. The current cost for a 4-inch sanitary
sewer connection installed during the construction of the sanitary sewer street main is
$2,888. Property owners whose household income is less than eighty percent of the
median family income may qualify for the monthly payment plan, which is approximately
$30 in addition to the regular sewer bill. CMU's current flat rate is $34.58 per month.
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), has also informed the Public Staff that due to the number of violations,
DWQ will not recommend the renewal of the NPDES permit for the White Forest
treatment plant and that the treatment plan can be shut down once CMU has installed
the new sewer main.

WATER / SEWER COMPANY WITH
REVENUES LESS THAN $200,000
(REVISED 1/04)
ANNUAL REPORT
OF
4 t ?� es7`-- A4cte WA.4.—f—� 1 0--
Company Name (as franchised by NCUC) NCUC Certificate No.
5 11
Mailing Address
City
State Zip
Area Code ( 24__) 6 7 C
Telephone Number (inc uding area code)
Area Code () 5_' /. 2‘
Fax Number (including area csd+
Email Address
TO THE
NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
For The Year Ended
December 31; 25-
RETURN TO: Public Staff - Accounting Division
North Carolina Utilities Commission
4326 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4326

FILING INSTRUCTIONS
Page 2
WHEN TO FILE:
This form, consisting of fourteen pages, must be filed with this Commission no later
than April 30th following the end of the calendar year covered by this report. Failure to
file your Annual Report on or before the due date will result in Commission action,
which may result in the assessment of financial penalties (North Carolina General
Statute GS 62-310).
WHERE TO FILE:
Send the original and two (2) copies to:
PUBLIC STAFF - ACCOUNTING DIVISION
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
4326 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-4326
NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
The original and two (2) copies of this report, legibly completed (including NCUC
certificate number) and signed and notarized, are required to be filed in order to satisfy
the Annual Report filing requirements established by this Commission. One copy of
this report should be maintained in your files.
VERIFICATION UNDER OATH REGARDING ACCURACY OF REPORT:
Both the original and the required copies of this report must be verified under oath by
the chief executive officer, a senior level financial officer, or the responsible accounting
officer of the utility.
QUESTIONS:
If you have any questions or need assistance in completing this report or questions
concerning this Commission's Annual Report filing requirements, call or write the Public
Staff - Accounting Division, 4326 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
4326, Telephone Number [phone]. This report is available in Microsoft Excel
on the Public Staff's web site at:
http://www.pubstaff.commerce.state.nc.us/psacctg/report.htm.

GENERAL COMPANY DATA
FILING STATUS: (check one only)
Corporation P rtnership
Subchapter S Corp. I/ Sole Proprietorship
Other (Describe Below)
2. NAME, TITLE, AND COMPENSATION OF OFFICERS, PARTNERS, OR SOLE PROPRIETORS
Name
• r `"
14 5
Title
Total Compensation 1/
1/ Include salary, wages, bonuses, partnership/owner drawings, etc.
INDIVIDUA TO WHOM CORRESPONDENCE OR QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REPORT CAN BE SENT:
f t 41z47 9k 63(79f(
Name Title Telephone No.
4. YEAR COMPANY FIRST BEGAN OPERATIONS:
2
If the reporting utility company is owned by a corporation or is part of a consolidated group, list the owner and
all entities making up the corporation or consolidated grojrp:
6. ACCOUNTIN RECORDS NTAINE AT:
cAri
Street Address
City
State Zip
7. REPORTING COMPANY'S ACCOUNTING YEAR ENDING DATE (ONLY IF DIFFERENT THAN DECEMBER 31):
Note. North Carolina Utilities Commission Rule R1-32 requires that Annual Reports be completed based on the
calendar year ended December 31.
GENERAL FINANCIAL DATA:
Annual operating revenues
Utility plant in service at year end
End -of -period customers
WATER
SEWER
COMBINED

Page 4
SERVICE AREAS
(NOTE: If more columns are needed for additional subdivisions or service areas, use supplementary sheets.)
For each subdivision or service area, list the following in alphabetical order.
Name of subdivision or service area
Water. DENR System Identification No.
Sewer. NPDES or Non Discharge Permit No.
County (or counties)
Type of service (Check one or more)
Water Service
Sewer Service
Number of wells in service
Total pumping capacity of pumps in service (gpm)
Total storage tank capacity (gallons)
Source of water supply (check one or more)
W(
Sf
W(
S( )
W(
)
S( )
Pumped from Wells W( ) W( ) W( )
Purchased from others P( ) P( ) P( )
Other O( ) O( ) O( )
Not applicable N( ) N( ) N( )
Types of water treatment (check one or more)
Chlorination C( ) C( ) C( )
Iron treatment I( ) I( ) I( )
Other O( ) O( ) O( )
Not applicable N( ) N( ) N( )
Are hydrants and storage tanks available for fire protection?
Fire protection F( ) F( ) F( )
No fire protection N( ) N( ) N( )
Is service metered?
Meters M( ) M( ) M( )
No meters N ) N( ) N( )
Source of sewage treatment (check one or more)
Treat own sewage ( ) T( ) T( )
Purchase treatment from others P( ) P( ) p( )
Not applicable N( ) N( ) N( )
Number of customers at year end:
Water
Sewer
Number of customers that can be served by mains already
installed (include present customers, vacant lots, etc.):
Water
Sewer
Number of availability customers at end of year (only
applicable to companies charging availability rates
separate from water or sewer service):
Water
Sewer

Line
No.
1©.
14.
17.
18.
19.
WATER AND SEWER COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS
Title of Account
(a)
`Utility Plant
Utility plant (must agree with Page 9, Line 5, Column (d))
Accumulated provision for depreciation and amortization of
utility plant
Net utility plant (Line 1 minus Line 2)
Utility plan
a
uisition adjustment
Accumulated provision for amortization of acquisition
adjustment
Net utility plant acquisition adjustment (L4 minus L5)
Total utility plant (L3 plus L6)
Other Property and Investments
Nonutility property
Accumulated provision for depreciation and amortization of
nonutility property
Other investments
Total other property and investments (L8 - L9 + L10)
Current Assets and Other Debits
Cash
Special deposits
Customer accounts receivable
Materials and supplies
Other current and accrued assets
Miscellaneous deferred debits
Total current assets and other debits (L12 thru
Total assets and other debits (L7 + L11 + L18)
Remarks:
7
Balance at
Beginning of Year
(b)
Page 5
Balance at
End of Year
(c)
0
0
0

WATER AND SEWER COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
CAPITAL, LIABILITIES, AND OTHER CREDITS
Page 6
Line
No.
2.
4.
5.
8.
9.
10.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Balance at Balance at
Title of Account Beainninq of Year End of Year
(a) (b) (c)
Stockholders' Equity (if Corporation
Common stock shares
Paid -in capital
Retained eamings
Other
Total common equity (Sum of L1 thru L4)
Preferred stock
Total stockholders' equity (L5 + L6)
OR
Proprietary Capital (if Partnership/Proprietorship)
Total proprietary capital
Liabilities and Other Credits
Long-term debt
Accounts payable ,
Notes payable
Customer deposits
Taxes accrued
Interest accrued
Other current and accrued Iiabitities
Customer advances for construction
Other deferred credits
Miscellaneous operating reserves
Contributions in aid of construction
Total Iiabitities and other credits (Sum of L9 thru L19)
Total capital, liabilities, & other credits (L7 + L8 + L20)
V
STATEMENT OF RETAINED EARNINGS / PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Retained eamings or proprietary capital at beginning of year
Add: Net income (loss) for the year "
Less: Dividends declared during the year
Other (itemize below)
Retained eamings or proprietary capital at end of year (Sum of L22 thru L25)
Line 25 (other retained eamings activity)
57a(
0
1/ Reference to Page 6, Line 3, Column (b) or Page 6, Line 8, Column (b), whichever pplicab e.
2/ Reference to Page 8, Line 33, Column (d).
3/ Must agree with Page 6, Line 3, Column (c), or Page 6, Line 8, Column (c), whichever is applicable.

Page 7`
Type of Loan'
ltals
SCHEDULE OF DEBT OF UTILITY
(Use additional pages if needed to report all loans)
Date of Maturity
Lender Collateral' Loan Date
Original
Loan
Amount
Current
Amount
Outstanding
Interest
Interest Paid
Rate (%) This Year
1/ Indicate purpose of loan and whether the loan is a first mortgage, notes payable to banks, etc.
2/ Indicate whether loan is personally endorsed, and if so, by whom.
3/ If interest rate is variable, please describe terms of rate changes (example: prime rate + 1.0%).

Line
No.
10.
12.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
24.
25.
26.
27,
28.
29.
30.
33.
WATER AND S
For the Year
Item
(a).
Operating Revenues
Metered service revenue
Flat rate service revenue
Reconnection fees
Returned check charges
Late payment charges
Other operating revenue (itemize
0
OMB NED INCOME STATEMENT
December 31,
Page 8
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES (Sum of L1 thru L6)
Operating Expenses
,Total salaries and wages (employees only)
Outs
a
expense (non -employees)
`Administrative and office expense
Maintenance and repair expense
e
Electric power expense (exclude office)
Chemicals
Testing fees
nse
Transportation expense (cost of operating utility vehicle)
Annual depreciation ex
Party taxed paid on utility property
Payroll taxes (FICA, FUTA, SUTA)
Other operating expense (itemize below)
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES (Sum of L8 thru L20)
Operating Taxes
Franchise (gross receipts) tax
Annual NCUC regulatory fee
State income taxes
Federal income
TOTAL OPERATING TAXES (Sum of L22 thru L25)
NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) (L7 - L21 - 1.26)
Non -operating revenues and expenses
Interest income
Other non -operating revenue (itemize below)
lnte
n
Other non -operating expense (itemize below)
TOTAL NON -OPERATING INCOME (L28+L29-L30-L31)
Net income (loss) (L27 + L32)
Line 6 (other operating revenue)
Line 20 (other operating expense)
Line 29 (other non -operating revenue)
Line 31 (other non -operating expense)
Water Sewer Combined
(b) (c) (d)
6
0
0

Line
No.
2.
Line
No.
4.
RATES CH,
Item
ED AT YEAR END AND GALLONS SOLD
Rates being charged at year, end:
Measured (metered) service: Base charge (including gallons)
Usage charge (per 1,000 gallons)
Flat rate service
Tap -on fee or connection fee
Reconnect fee
Late payment charge
_Total gallons sold (metered rates only)
INVESTMENT IN WATER/SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM
For the Year Ended December 31,
Original cx st of system(s)
Actual cost of all additions to system(s) since original
construction
Total cost of system(s) to date (L3 plus L4)
Accumulated depreciation
Net cost of system(s) (L5 minus L6)
Cost of plant additions during this 12-month
reporting period
Water
(b)
Water
(a)
Sewer
fc1-
Page 9
Sewer
(b)
Combined
(d)
Contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) received
during this 12-month reporting period
Cumulative CIAC received (excluding gross up)
Accumulated amortization of CIAC at year end
IMPORTANT: Contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) are generally defined in the
National Association of Regulatory Commissioners (NARUC) Uniform System
of Accounts as money, services, or property received by the utility company
from customers, developers, or any other source at no cost to the utility
company which offsets the acquisition, improvement, or construction costs of
the utility's property, facilities, or equipment to be used to provide utility
service. Tap -on fees and meter installation fees are forms of CIAC.

BOND INFORMATION
(Note: If more lines are needed for additional bonds, attach supplementary Sheets.)
For each bond (certificate of deposit, letter of credit, etc.) posted, list the following:
Line
No.
4.
6.
7.
10.
12.
14.
17.
Signature and Title:
Form of Bond
NOTARIZATION
Sworn to and subscribed to me
this the ,2 e day o
Notary Pu`6iic
My Commission expires:
Amount of Bond
IMPORTANT: Rule R7-37(g) and Rule R10-24(g) require wat
statement to its Annual Report stating the amount of each bond,
renewal. Completion of the above meets this requirement.
11111114.
Up
Notary
public
Is the Bond
Still in Effect?
Date:
Page 10
Date of
Next Renewal
aisiPirrfbmpanies to attach a separate notarized
+Y`t to bond is still in effect, and the date of next

Page 11
Subdivision or System
SYSTEM AND OPERATOR STATUS (WAT 'R)
County
Number of Certified Operator
Welts In Responsible Charge
Check if more than 50 miles fr ►m residence of Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC).

Page 12
REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT REPORT
List any notice of violation during the reporting year from any regulatory agency (county Health Department, DWQ,
DEH, EPA, etc.) Use additional pages, if necessary.
System
ID No.
NPDES or
Nondischarge
Permit No.
System Name
System Name
WATER OPERATIONS
Date of
Notice
SEWER OPERATIONS
Date of
Notice
Type of Violation
Type of Violation
Resolved?
(YIN)
Resolved?
(YIN)

Page 13
Line
No.
2.
10.
11.
12.
REGULATORY FEE RECONCILIATION
Regulatory Fee Reports
Regulatory fee report for quarter ended March 31, Line 1
,Regulatory fee report for quarter ended June 0, Line 1
Regulatory fee report for quarter ended September 30, Line 1
Regulatory fee report
quarter ended December 31, Line 1
Total NC jurisdictional revenues for
Lines 1 through 4)
Total operating revenues
Page 8, 1,.in
year re
on regulato
7, Column (d)]
fee reports (Sum of
Difference between regulatory fee reports and Annual Report (Line 5 minus Line 6)
Explanation of Difference(s2
(Include a brief written description of each difference)
Total difference(s) (Sum of Lines 8 through 12 - Should be equal to Line 7)
Amount
2 c0

VERIFICATION UNDER OATH REGARDING ACCURACY OF REPORT
(NOTE: THIS VERIFICATION SHALL BE COMPLE 1 ED BY EITHER THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A SENIOR
LEVEL FINANCIAL OFFICER, OR THE RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER.)
I , /4 4,4 S , state and attest that the attached
Annual Report to the North Carolina Utili 'es Commission is filed on behalf of
Q f .¢ - (Name of Water and/or
Sewer Company) as required by the North Carolina Utilities Commission; that I have
reviewed said Report and, in the exercise of due diligence, have made reasonable
inquiry into the accuracy of the information provided therein; and that, to the best of
my knowledge, information, and belief, all of the information contained therein is
accurate and true, no material- information or fact has been knowingly omitted or
misstated therein, and all of the information contained in said Report has been
prepared and presented in accordance with all applicable North Carolina General
Statutes, Commission Rules, and Commission Orders.
Signature of Person Making Verification
Date
NOTARIZATION
Sworn to and subscribed to me
this the a2 day of
Notary Public
My Commission expires:v

orest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Subject: RE: White Forest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
From: "Gwaltney, Dennis" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:36:14 -0500
To: "Bliss, Chuck" <[e-mail]>, "Marcia Allocco"
<[e-mail]>
CC: "Miller, Steve \(CMUD\)" <[e-mail]>
Just an update on where we stand with regards to sewer service connections in the White Forest
Community. Currently we have six out of seven
We have applications for service from the following:
7740, 7732, 7724, 7708 Hammond Drive, 8906, and 8928 Myra Way, the only property owner remaining
to apply is 8940 Myra Way (Miguel Angel "Chaves & Irma M. Perez)
From: Bliss, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:36 PM
To: 'Marcia Allocco'
Cc: Gwaltney, Dennis; Miller, Steve (CMUD)
Subject: RE: White Forest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Marcia - Great find! Looks like good information. CMU will see what is involved.
Steve and Dennis - Do we need to met and discuss this CDBG option for connection fees for White
Forest?
Thanks, Chuck
From: Marcia Allocco [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 01:48
To: Bliss, Chuck
Subject: Re: White Forest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
I've found information on the following which may be a perfect fit:
Community Development Block Grant program - The North Carolina Department of
Commerce oversees the comprehensive community economic development strategies that
are carried out by state governmental agencies and its allies. The Department, through the
Division of Community Assistance (DCA), administers the North Carolina Small Cities
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Much of the CDBG program is
oriented toward the goals contained in the department's strategic plan and the 2006-2010
North Carolina Consolidated Plan which are organized to fulfill the department's mission
statement. From their website http://www.dca.commerce.state.nc.us/cdbo/ I clicked on
Infrasturcture (http://www.dca.commerce.state.nc.us/cdbo/infrastructure.asp) and found the
following on the hook-up program but it looks like you would have to apply ASAP:
Hook -Up Program
The Infrastructure Hook -Up Program is designed to enable eligible local governments with
existing public water and/or sewer line(s) to connect or "hook-up" low and moderate -income
(LMI) households to non-CDBG funded line(s). CDBG funds may only be used to connect LMI
1 of 5 10/3 1 /2006 9:25 AM

rest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
owner -occupied dwellings and LMI tenant -occupied dwellings provided the landlord is also LMI
The maximum grant amount is $75,000.
CDBG funds may be used to pay for the following eligible activities in the Infrastructure
Hook -Up Program, 1) tap -on or assessment fee to connect to the line, 2) service connection
for the private property, 3) use of special equipment such as grinder pumps or vacuum pits to
transport residential wastewater to the existing sewer lines, 4) cost to remove septic tanks or
cap wells, as required by the health department, 5) repairs to a LMI household's leaking water
pipes provided that it is documented that the leaking pipes are a result of connecting to the
public water line.
CDBG funds may be used to pay for the following eligible activities in the Infrastructure
Hook -Up Program, 1) tap -on or assessment fee to connect to the line, 2) service connection
for the private property, 3) use of special equipment such as grinder pumps or vacuum pits to
transport residential wastewater to the existing sewer lines, 4) cost to remove septic tanks or
cap wells, as required by the health department, 5) repairs to a LMI household's leaking water
pipes provided that it is documented that the leaking pipes are a result of connecting to the
public water line.
Applications for 2006 will be accepted in an open window cycle beginning August 26,
2006. The window will stay open until funds are depleted or December 1, 2006. A local
government interested in applying for the Infrastructure Hook -Up Program must call, to see if
funds are available and, if they are, to request to be put on the "Prospective Applicant List". If
funds are available, the requested amount will be reserved for the potential applicant. A
potential applicant will have 90 days from the date of the request to submit the application;
otherwise, the reservation will be rescinded and will become available to another potential
applicant.
• 2006 Infrastructure Application Guidelines
• 2006 Infrastructure Hook -Up Application Guidelines
For additional information, please contact:
Vanessa Tunstall
Senior Development Specialist
919 733-2850
vtunstallAnccommerce.com
Bliss, Chuck wrote:
Ms Allocco - Sorry for asking this question before seeing your last
email. So what I understand is that there is not a way for NCDENR to
"force" these people to connect to the CMU system until the current
permit expires on November 30, 2008. Is that correct?
What happens (i.e. After 11/30/08) if the people have not connected to
CMU? Dennis has said this is a "lower income area" and hence people may
not have the money to pay CMU's connection fees which for sewer right
now is $3,076. Does NCDENR have some way to pay those fees for these
people?
2 of 5 10/31/2006 9:25 AM

©rest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Thanks, Chuck
-----Original Message -----
From: Marcia Allocco [manta :marcia.a11occatncmaii.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:06
To: Bliss, Chuck
Subject: Re: White Forest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
I forgot to add that the permit can not be rescinded while any
activities requiring this permit continue at the permitted facility.
Therefore, if we have some who don't switch over we can't rescind the
permit until they are switched over.
Marcia
Bliss, Chuck wrote:
Ms Allocco - Dennis and I work together here at CMU and I just read
your email. When does that NPDES permit for the White Forest WWTP
expire or has it already expired and is pending renewal? If it does
not expire soon, I am wondering how long the people of White Forest
have to transfer to the CMU system.
Thanks, Chuck
-----Original Message -----
From: Marcia Allocco [mailto:marcia allocco@ncmail..net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 09:15
To: Gwaltney, ➢ennis
Cc: gina.casselberrytncmail.net; Price, Jeff; Elmore, Christopher;
Bliss, Chuck; Shearin, Barry ➢.
Subject: Re: White Forest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Dennis,
I spoke with Rex Gleason, my supervisor regarding the White Forest
WWTP.
He stated, "you can tell the residents that the State will not be
recommending the renewal of the NP➢ES permit for White Forest once
there is an alternate sewer system in the area. This is due to the
environmental problems and recurring violations of the white Forest
facility". In addition, Rex said the permittee does have the right to
shut down the system once the alternate sewer system has been
installed.
Rex also said that you can point the residents to this Office
(704-663-1699) if they want to verify that the State will not be
recommending the renewal of the permit.
3 of 5 1©/31 /2006 9:25 AM

rest Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Marcia Allocco
Gwaltney, Dennis wrote:
Marcia and Gina, CMU is advertising the subject project on August 28,
2006 and will be receiving bids on September 26, 2006 at 2:00 PM. We
have a pre -bid conference scheduled for Thursday, September 14, 2006
at 2:00 PM. The project is scheduled to go to Charlotte City Council
for approval on Monday, October 23, 2006 and the availability date
for
the contract is Monday, November 13, 2006. The contract time is 138
calendar days with a completion date of Saturday, March 31, 2007.
Attached is an example of a letter and Fact Sheet I have hand
delivered and mailed to the following property owners :
* Mr. Neofite Aduato - 7748 Hammond Drive* **(Currently on septic
tank) *
* Mr. Quang Doung - 7740 Hammond Drive
* Ms. Bernadine E. Mangan --* 7732 Hammond Drive*
* Ms. Virgina M. Adams -* 7724 Hammond Drive*
* Mr. Edward F. Mangan .* 7708 Hammond Drive*
* Mr. Sirous Behrouzjou - 8906 Myra Way (Mailing Address P.O. Box
10263 Charlotte, N.C. 28212
* Mr. Souksavanh Ngaoluangrath - 8928 Myra Way
* Mr. Miguel Angel Chaves - 8940 Myra Way
In additional to the attached letter and fact sheet, I have included
an application for sewer service and a Special Application which
allows the resident to pay for their service connections over a
period
of time.
Marcia and Gina, I currently have in hand applications for sewer
connections for 7708, 7724, and 7732 Hammond Drive. Hopefully I will
receive calls from the other residents and they will also make
application for sewer service. CMU's White Forest project is being
constructed parallel to the existing White Forest Wastewater System
currently owned by Mr. Gene Mullis and will provide the property
owners in the Whiteforest System with an alternative means of
receiving wastewater service. My concern is that some of the
residents
4 of 5 10/31/2006 9:25 AM

rest Sanit
Sewe
mprovements
may choose not to make application to the CMU system. Does the N.C.
Utilities Commission have any means to help stimulate interest among
the property owners?
<Whiteforestletter77322006.doc» «WHITE FOREST FACT SHEET.doc»
Marcia Allocco [e-mail] North Carolina Dept. of
Environment & Natural Resources ➢iv. of Water Quality 610 E. Center
Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax; 704.663.6040
Marcia Allocco - [e-mail] North Carolina ➢ept. of
Environment & Natural Resources ➢iv. of Water Quality 610 E. Center
Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone]
Marcia Allocco - [e-mail]
North Carolina ➢ept. ofEnvironment& Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone]
5 of 5 10/31 /2©©6 9:25 AM

Oct '12 06 09:46a Gene Mullis
p.1
7045672649
TO
COMPANY
FROM:
NAME_
COMMENTS
Number ©t
TIIANRS I
GENE MULLIS
Plumbing Contractor
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Celt [phone]
8033 Hood Road
Charlotte, NC 28215
State L.ic # 6E105
30 Years Experience
cover:
jcr t .
N ` U°Y « E
OFFICE
OCT 1 2 200
E

Oct '12 06 09n47a Gene Mullis 7045672649 p2
ate Fo
elr Treatment
Telephone 704.566.055 * Facsimile 704.567_2649
10-10-06
Mr. D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Ave.
Suite 301
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Subject: White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC 0063932
Response Letter
Tracking #: NOV-2006-PC-0379
Case No. LV-2046-0112
Case No. LV-2646-0166
Case No. LV-2006-0247
Case No. LV-2006-0294
Gentlemen:
I agree with your unsatisfactory rating and once again ester a request to immediately
abandon the White forest WWTP. It is not feasible to try to operate a WWTP for.only
three people - who don't want it. Our water ways are much more precious than a few
homes which pose the opportunity for pollution.
The effluence which enters the White Forest WWTP is pretreated by septic tanks to a
grey water quality which should bring question to the logic of adding a dangerous
chemical such as chlorine; particularly when the flow of effluence is too low and too
sporadic to maintain a proper ug/1 level. Then another chemical is needed to de -chlorinate
the effluence, but now we have the probability of increased TDS.
I suggest that the White Forest WWTP is caught -up in your ever -changing requirements
for facilities of much larger capabilities and should be singled out to be allowed to
operate by the requirements which have been sufficient for the past ten years.
I am enclosing my letter to the State of North Carolina Utilities Comnussion requesting
to cease all operations and properly abandon all facilities offthe White Forest WWTP
and for the rescission of the NPDES permit NC0063932.

Oct 12 06 09:47a Gene Mullis 7045672649 p.3
I arn also enclosing a copy of the 2005 annual report which shows a negative operating
shortfall of $21,898.58: a surety of non-support by those who dump their waste water into
the White Forest system. That figure doesn't include my allowable wages of $12.30 per
week nor the $1.92 per week for all other expenses which go unpaid because the perfect
world of the Accounting Division has yet to be achieved.
As the temporary operator of a North Carolina Utility, I can see that I am completely
under your power.
What you say, you say.
What you do, you do. But there is seldom a match.
I can only charge what you tell me to charge. You have set my rates.
You have limited me to seven customers.
There is not a way to make-up for lost revenues nor is there a way to pass additional costs
and fees along to the customers: who are ultimately liable for all costs to provide -them a
service of necessity. Along with an 8.5% return.
You haven't given your associates in Charlotte the information needed for me to properly
disconnect a non -payer in a wayto insure non -pollution.
My four immigrant non -payers have realized how to flaunt your error.
Non-payment is the only reason for discontinuing service; but in this situation there is no
reasoning. Though you originally suggested abandoning a system with so small a
participation, now you suggest no way of abandorunent but for an alternative system.
I am quite perplexed to be continuously working with these seven people in a way to
allow them their domicile through a bad situation propagated by others while the State of
North Carolina views me as a violator, while placing the whole burden of compliance to
changing laws upon me without any compensation.
It would be nice to see a benefit from what you do, but then, I guess you will do what you
wilt do.
Sincerely,
HE Mullis
White Forest WWTP

Oct 72 06 09:47a Gene Mullis
7045672649
p.4
09-18-06
�i a Forest Waa + r Treat
8033 Hood R
Chariotfe, North Carolina 2821
Te{eplbne 704.566.0555 Facsimile 704.567_2649
State of North Carolina Utilities Commission
4235 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-5325
Docket # W-1157
Attn: Ms. Castlebury
Gentlemen:
Noting that the White Forest WWTP is operating at a woes deficit; aEttempting to
provide services to only seven customers of whom only three are ms€lo Ctg an effort to pay
for those services and that C-MUD is in the beginning stages of construction of a parallel
system designed to replace the White Forest WWTP:
I am requesting permission to immediately cease all operatic) ns and properly abandon all
facilities of the White Forest WWTP once flow has been diverted into the C-MUD
system.
I am also on ofthe NI'DES permitting of ih t permit NC4063932.
I am also requesting permission a legal means available to an. NC utility to inillict
upon those seven custo ers of it Forest WWTP: all related costs, permitting and
civil penalties pertaining to absolving the White Forest WWTP and it's owners, as well
as venues of forced collection procedures of past due amounts for services rendered such
as attachment of liens to affected properties.
Thank You,
HE Mu11i
White Forest WWII'
8033 Hood Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28215
704.634.7991

Oct 12 06 09:47a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p.5
WATER / SEWER COMPANY WITH
REVENUES LESS THAN $200,000
(REVISED 1144)
ANNUAL REPORT
OF
CfA 'i�-a-= &es/ -/ r
Company Name (as franchised by NCUC) NCUC Certificate No.
33 Aft
Ad
dress
City State Zip
Area Code
Telephone Nur`nber (Inc uding area code)
Area Code ((7‘ ) 5767 26'
Fax Number (including area code)
Email Address
TO THE
NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
For The Year Ended
December 31, s2C)D5
RETURN TO: Public Staff - Accounting Division
North Carolina Utilities Commission
4326 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-4326

' Oct '12 06 09:47a Gene Mullis 7045672649 Pi6
Page 2
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
WHEN TO FILE:
This form, consisting of fourteen pages, must be filed with this Commission no later
than April 30th following the end of the calendar year covered by this report. Failure to
file your Annual Report on or before the due date will result in Commission action,
which may result in the assessment of financial penalties (North Carolina General
Statute GS 62-310).
WHERE TO FILE:
Send the original and two (2) copies to:
PUBLIC STAFF - ACCOUNTING DIVISION
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
4326 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-4326
NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
The original and two (2) copies of this report, legibly completed (including NCUC
certificate number) and signed and notarized, are required to be filed in order to satisfy
the Annual Report filing requirements established by this Commission. One copy of
this report should be maintained in your files.
VERIFICATION UNDER OATH REGARDING ACCURACY OF REPORT:
Both the original and the required copies of this report must be verified under oath by
the chief executive officer, a senior level financial officer, or the responsible accounting
officer of the utility.
QUESTIONS:
if you have any questions or need assistance in completing this report or questions
concerning this Commission's Annual Report filing requirements, call or write the Public
Staff - Accounting Division, 4326 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
4326, Telephone Number [phone]. This report is available in Microsoft Excel
on the Public Staffs web site at:
http://www.pubstaff.commerce.state.nc.usipsacctg/reporthtrn.

Oct 12 06 09:48a Gene Mullis 7045672649 P.7
FILING STATUS: (check one only)
Corporation
Subchapter S Corp.
GENERAL QMPANY DATA
ership Other (Describe Below)
Proprietorship
NAME, TITLE, AND COMPENSATION OF OFFICERS, PARTNERS, OR SOLE PROPRIETORS
Name Title Total Compensation 1J
E°5- ©0,) --6
nctude salary, wages, bonuses, partnership/owner drawings, etc_
IN©MDUA1 TO WHOM CORRESPONDENCE OR QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS REPORT CAN BE SENT:
Name
4. YEAR COMPANY FIRST BEGAN OPERATIONS:
e
porting utility company is o
0/4444 d 3c7 'rf
Title Telephone No.
d by a corporation or is part of a consolidated group, list the owner and
es making up the corporation or consolidated grop:
7. REPORTING COMPANY'S ACCOUNTING YEAR ENDING DATE (ONLY IF DIFFERENT THAN DECEMBER 31):
Note: North Carolina Utilities Commis
calendar year ended December
GENERAL FINANCIAL DATA:
Annual operating revenues
Utility plant in service at year end
End -of -period customers
Rule R1-32 requires that Annual Reports be completed based on the
WATER
SEWER
COMBINED

Oct 12 06 09:48a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p8
Page 4
SERVICE AREAS
(NOTE: If more columns are needed for additional subdivisions or service areas, use supplementary sheets.)
For each subdivision or service area, list the following in alphabetical order.
Name of subdivision or service area
Water. DENR System Identification No.
Sewer. NPDES or Non Discharge Permit No,
County (or counties)
Type of service (Check one or more)
Water Service
Sewer Service
Nurnber of wells in service
Total pumping capacity of pumps in service (gpm)
Total storage tank capacity (gallons)
Source of water supply (check one or more)
Pumped from Wells
Purchased from others
Other
Not applicable
Types of water treatment (check one or more)
Chlorination
Iron treatment
Other
Not applicable
Are Hydrants and storage tanks available for fire protection?
Fire protection
No fire protection
Is service metered?
Meters
No meters
Source of sewage treatment (check one or more)
Treat own sewage
Purchase treatment from others
Not applicable
W(
S(
Number of customers at year end:
Water
Sewer
Number of customers that can be served by mains already
installed (include present customers, vacant lots, etc.):
Water
Sewer
Number of availability customers at end of year (only
applicable to companies charging availability rates
separate from water or sewer service):
Water
Sewer
}
W(
W(
S( ) s( )
W( )
P( )
O( )
N( )
C( )
l( )
O( )
N( )
F( )
N( )
M( )
N( )
T( )
P( )
N(
W( )
P( )
O( )
N( )
C( )
)
O( )
N( )
F( )
N( )
M( )
N( )
T( )
PC )
N( )

Oct .12 06 09:48a Gene Mullis 7045672649 p.9
7. Total utili plant (L3 plusl
Other Property and Investments
8. Nonutillty property
Page 5
WATER AND SEWER COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS
Line
No.
Title pf Account
(a)
atance at
Beginning of Year
(b)
Balance at
End of Year
(c)
Utility Plant
1. Utility plant (must agree with Page 9, Line 5, Column (d))
2. Accumulated provision for depreciation and amortization of
utility plant
3. Net utility plant (Line 1 minus Line2)
4, Utili 'lant a • uisition adjustment
5. Accumulated provision for amortization of acquisition
adjustment
Net utility plant acquisition djustment (L4 minus L5)
Accumulated provision for depreciation and amortization of
nonutility property
10. Other investments
11. Total other property and investments (L8 - L9 ÷ L10)
Current Assets and Other Debits
12, Cash
3 Special deposits
14. Customer accounts receivable
15. Materials and supplies
16. Other current and accrued assets
17. Miscellaneous deferred debits
18. Total current assets and other debi
L
19. Total assets and other debits (L7 + L•11
Remarks:
L17)
/jccemc-daial h
(
9-6 or 41)

Oct 12 06 09:48a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p.1©
,one
No.
WATER AND SEWER COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
CAPITAL, LIABILITIES, AND OTHER CREDITS
a
holders* )Wcluwity (itf Corporation
Crncn
Balance at L ararrc�e at
Beglnninn of Year . End of Year
0
2, Paid -in capital
fined earning
Other
Totai common e u t Surrt of t_1 th L4
Preferr
Total stockholders' equity (L5 +
OR
Proprietary Capital of
Total proprietary capi
Liabilities and Other Credits
t onq-terry* debt
Accounts payable
Custom er d
Takce
prietorship)
4
0
accrued iiabititi
6
urstomer ad
constrrart-on
7
deterred c
us operating r' se
20
ntributions in aid of con tru Lion
Total liabilities and
21. Total
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
t
oilier credits (L7' L8 = L0
STATEMENT OF RETAINED EARNINGS / PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Retained earnings or proprietary capital at beginning of year
Add: Net income (loss) for the year 2/
Less: Dividends declared during the year
Other (itemize below)
Retained earnings or pr '►pnieta
pital at e
11
Line 25 (other retained earnings activity)
it Reference to Page 6, Line 3, Column (b) or Page 8, Line 8. Column (b). whiche
2/ Reference to Page 8. tine 33. Column (cc).
3/ Must agree will Page 6, Line 3, Column (c), or Page 6, Line 8, Column (c), whichever is applicable.
5741,0

SCHEDULE OF DEBT OF UTILITY
(Use additional pages if needed to report all loans)
Type of Lc► zn''
Lender
Collate
21
Date of Maturity
origin Current Interest
. Loan Amount Interest Paid
Loan Date Amount Qutstandln _Rate (%) 9' This Year
)tals
1/ Indicate purpose of loan and whether the loan is a first mortgage, notes payable to banks, etc,
2/ Indicate whether loan is personally endorsed, and If so, by whom,
3/ If interest rate Is variable, please describe terms of rate changes (example: prime rate + 1 O%)

Oct ' 12 06 09:50a Gene Mullis 7045672649 p.12
WATER AND SEWER COMBINE© INCOME STATEMENT
For the Year Ended December 31,
No. Item
Page 8
Sewer Combined
t pe t)nq Revenues
Metered ervicwe revenue
e service revery
Reconnection tees
4. Returned check chartte
h
0
operating revenue (itemize below
TOT
Operati
Total sa
PERATING REVENUES (Sum of L1 th6
es
es on
Y
Ouiside labor expense (non-e
0. Administrative and office expense
nonce and
p
2. Pursed
expense
Elec
p
ex
ce
4. Chemicals expense
Testing fe
Tr
on expense (cost of operating utr)rtlr vehicle
7, Annua# d
p
n
Proper taxes mid on unlit r prope
rroli taxes (1=1t A, FUTA„ SUTA
20. Other operating expense (iterrtce belo
21. TOTAL C?PERAATtNG E PEN ES (Sum of LS #hru
0
Operating Taxes
22. Franchise (dross receip
23. Ann rat NCUC requlat ry fe
24. State in
x
2. Fed
26. TOTAL OPERATINGTARE
27. NET OPERATING INCOME (L?
7
2
Non -operating revenues and expenses
Interest income
29, Other ncan-op
ev
ize bel
0
exi ense
Other no
ng exile e
2
TOTAL NON -OPERATING IN
0
Net income (loss) (L27 + L32)
Line 6 (other operating revenue)
Line 20 (other operating expense)
Line 29 (other non -operating revenue)
Line 31 (other non -operating expense)
4

Oct '12 06 09:50a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p.13
Page 9
RATES CHARGED AT YEAR END AND GALLONS SOLD
:an+
No
Sewer
fb}
Rates being charged at var end:
Measured (metered) service: Base ncluding gailo
Usage charge (per 1.000 gallons)
Tap tee or connection fee
Reconnect fee
ate payment charge
2.
Totalgailons sold (rnetered rates only)
Line
No.
3_
Item
(a)
of systems)
NT IN WATERISEWER UTILITY SYS t EMI
For the Year Ended December 31,'
Combined
(d)
4.
5.
10.
11.
all additions to system(s) since original
cons
Total cost of system(s) to date (L3 plus L4)
Accumulated detareiation
Net cost of systems) (L5 minus
Cost of plant additions during this 12-mon
reporting period
Contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) received
;during this 12-month reporting period
muletive CIAC
ved (excluding gross up)
Accumulated amortization of CIAC at year end
IMPORTANT: Contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) are generally defined in the
Nafional Association of Regulatory Commissioners (NARUC) Uniform System
of Accounts as money, services, or property received by the utility company
from customers, developers, or any other source at no cost to the utility
company which offsets the acquisition, improvement, or construction costs of
the utility's property, facilities, or equipment to be used to provide utility
service. Tap -on fees and meter installation fees are forms of CIAC.

Oct 12 06 09:51a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p.14
BOND INFORMATION
(Note: If more lines are needed for additional bonds, attach supplementary sheets.)
For each bond (certificate of deposit, letter of credit, etc.) posted, list the following:
Line
No.
4.
7.
Form of Bond
Amount of Bond
Is the Bond
Still in Effect?
Page 10
Date of
Next Renewal
11.
12.
14.
17.
18.
Signature and Title:
NOTARIZATION
Sworn to and subscribed to me
this the 2 e day of S
Notary Plic
My Commission expires: 474 / 2—es,a
NotacV
public
Date:
IMPORTANT: Rule R7-37(g) and Rule R10--24(g) require wat N# i dl/lll Smpanies to attach a separate notarized
statement to its Annual Report stating the amount of each bend, wi iThirWthe bond is still in effect, and the date of next
renewal. Completion of the above meets this requirement.

Oct *12 06 09:51a Gene Mullis 7045672649 p.15
Page 11
SYSTEM. AND OPERATOR STATUS (WATER)
division o
un
to
d Operator >t!*
ponsible Gharcle Tr ite{
Check if more than 50 miles from residence of Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC).

Oct *12 06 09.51a Gene Mullis
7045672649
p.16
Page 12
REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT REPORT
List any notice of violation during the reporting year from any regulatory agency (County Health Department, ©WQ,
DEN, EPA, etc.) Use additional pages, if necessary.
System
ID No.
Name
ATER OPERATIONS
©ate o
NoticE
Resolved?
Type of Violation (YlN)
NPDES or
Nondischarge
Permit No.
System Name
SEWER OPERATIONS
Date of
Notice
Type of Violation
Resolved?
(YIN)

©ct'12 06 09:52a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p.17
REGULATORY FEEREC©NCIUATIoN
Page 13
No
is{2rtory Fee Repo
report for quarter ended March 31, Line 1
Regulatory fee re
uarter ended June 30, Lin
Regulatory fee re «rt for quarter ended Sept :rrtber 30, Lin
Regulatory fee report frsr quartea
Total NC jurisdictional revenues
Lines 1 through 4)
TouIPac e 8, Line 7, Ct urnn (d))
ed December 1, Line 1
he year reported on regulatory fee reports (Sum of
e. between regulat y fee resorts, and Annual Report (Line 5 minus Line 6)
;Explanation of Ciriere c*(s)
(Include a bn driptio
h di
r�f
0
2
Total diffe n e(s r (burn of Lines 8 fihraugh 12 - Should be equal to Line 7)

©ct'12 06 09:52a Gene Mullis
7045672649 p:1 S
Page 14
VERIFICATION UNDER OATH REGARDING ACCURACY OF REPORT
(NOTE: THIS VERIFICATION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY EITHER THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A SENIOR
LEVEL FINANCIAL OFFICER, OR THE RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER.)
state and attest that the attached
Annual Report to the North Carolina Utilities Commission is filed on behalf of
' = eP` ! Fm ‘r.G e (Name of Water and/or
Sewer Company) as required by the North Carolina Utilities Commission; that I have
reviewed said Report and, in the exercise of due diligence, have made reasonable
inquiry into the accuracy of the information provided therein; and that, to the best of
my knowledge, information, and belief, all of the information contained therein is
accurate and true, no material information or fact has been knowingly omitted or
misstated therein, and all of the information contained in said Report has been
prepared and presented in accordance with all applicable North Carolina General
Statutes, Commission Rules, and Commission Orders_
Signature of Person Making Verification
Job Title
Date
NOTARIZATION
Sworn to and subscribed to me
this the ask' day of
Notary Public
My Comrrlislc►n expires:

Michael F. Easley„ Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 11, 2006
Mr. Gene Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
116-J Freeland Lane
Charlotte, NC 28217
SUBJECT: Delinquent Annual Fee
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
OCT 1
I sent you a letter earlier today via certified mail regarding the payment of overdue NPDES permit
annual fees. In the third paragraph of the letter I erred in showing the amount you owe. The correct
total is 1,430.00, as was noted in the first paragraph.
I apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me by phone at [phone], extension 547
or via e-mail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
(1/
Robert L. Sledge
Western NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
NPDES File
DWQ Budget Office - Fran McPherson
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 512 N, Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
Carolina
'Lt��lf
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Michael D Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary
North Carolina Department of bnvironment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 13, 2006
McdJenburg County Sheriff Office
700 Fast 41" Street.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Re: NOTICE OF SERVICE
H.E. Mullis
a ached correspondence as follows:
11E, Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
understanding that because we are a State agency, no fee is required for this service. We would
-ning the completed Return of Service form in the return envelope provided herein.
lll�'1 Section appreciates this assistance from your department. Should you have any questions, please
contact l le at [phone], ext. 2204.
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: cvww.nowaterqo?jjiy_&rz
Sincerely,
Marcia Allocco
Environmental Chemist
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Ave, Suite 3(11 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
Phone [phone]
One
NorthCarolina
A aturaily
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

RETURN OF SERVICE
s NOTICE OF SERVICE was received on the
20 06 , and together with the correspondence
scull on the I S kaL day ofS
ith
lamed individua
6116 ne y s ur k=L I— .
n address where copy delivered)
wing:
g copies to the named individual;
dwelling house or place of business.
named individual, state reason:
Agency)
this form to:
Paid by: N/A
1. of Environment & Natural Resources
Water Protection Section
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
1ooresville, North Carolina 28115
Attention: Marcia Allocco
was served
day of
as follows:
w,20°6,atthe
, who is a person of suitable age discretion and who resides in
SEP 2 8 200(

STAVE OF NORTH CAROL]INA
COUNTY OF MECICLENBITRG
AFFIDAVIT OF PERSONAL SERVICE
PERSONALLY APPEARED before me, the undersigned authority, J . C-1-660-rd
Deputy Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, so being duly sworn, deposes and says that in the County of
Mecklenburg, State of North Carolina, serving the defendants by the laws governing service of Civil
Process within the State of North Carolina, he delivered to the within named defendant(s) at the following
time(s) and fplace(s) to wit:
NAME: - m vt s
© by delivering to the defendant named above a copy of the summons and co
X by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint and/or
at the dwelling house or usual place of a. ode o tl e def as namec arcove a person of suitable
and discretion then residing therein.
was served:
DATE: Month/Day/Year: el" is - 04
LOCATION:_ t / 6
1
0
A true copy of 0 summons and complaint or 0 , and fisher, he
knows that the person(s) so served to be the one(s) mentioned and the deponent is not a party to the action.
Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: 5,-). c'37
Deputy Sheriff
Sworn to and subscribed before me,
this
day of 200
Notary Public- Mecklenburg County NC
My Commission expires:

e Forest Wastewater Treatment
Hood Road
Charkdte, North Carina 28215
Telephone [phone] • Facsimile 704.567.2649
July18, 2006
Mr. D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection. Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Ave.
Suite 301
Mooresville, N. C. 28115
Subject: White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC 0063932
Gentlemen:
'MURAL RESOURCE'S
ONAL OFFICE
AUG 1 0 2006
wt TO
I suppose you would reckon a waste water treatment plant to be owned by someone with
a profit motive.
That may have been the case when WFWWTP was originated; but someone in your
regulatory scheme of things, wanting to clear out old files: dismissed that person, leaving
7 homeowners without a clue about their wastewater going into nearby Reedy Creek.
Regulatory personal allowed the expansion of the adjacent McCarron WWTP as a way to
abandon that atrocity known as White Forest WWTP: but you never really planned on
actually having a connection to those 7 homes; as I was led to believe.
As the new owner of the land on which the White Forest WWTP is located, I was forced
into being the Emergency Operator, because no alternative could be found.
I have continuously begged for this plant to be closed down and abandoned.
This is truly an issue of necessity and convenience for 7 indigent homeowners: with
names like Ngolwangrath, Duong, Behrouzjou,Chavec and Mangan.
Without compensation, I now find myself trying to collect $150.00 from each of 7
impoverished families while being forced to pay $1200.00 in hard maintenance costs per
month.
Presently, collections are behind about $18,000.00 with many past due bills waiting to be
paid: did I say without compensation? I am forced to pay those bills out of my own
pocket, along with all necessary repairs, pumps, piping and even postage for those 7
families to be able to live in their homes.
You naturally might say "dis-connect them!" What a JOKE. You've never seen so many
government agencies scrambling! Plus, would you want 49 mad Mexicans as neighbors
watching for your back to be turned?

C-MUD is on your regulatory "FAST TRACK" to install a new collection system for
those 7 homes and allow for abandonment of the White Forest WWTP, but all 7 must
connect. If I disconnect the 4 for non-payment: the deal will fall through; even if it ever
gets your approval. Thanksgiving, 2004 was the original target date.
By your own office's evaluations: "the White Forest WWTP has an almost non-existant
flow into Reedy Creek."
FIow rates are much too small to properly regulate chlorine feeding, which is a bit or
miss science at best.
However, as the owner and emergency operator of White Forest WWTP; realizing the
catastrophic effects of chlorine in our bodies and in our bodies of water: I have taken the
emergency measures of installing de-chlor feeding tubes into the discharge piping of the
WWTP. Subsequent testing shows this to be working.
Guide lines for operating a utility appoint all operating costs to be borne by the users of
said utility.
I haven't found the teeth to be available to force this issue upon the users.
How do I obtain monies from users to pay your penalties on their wastewater treatment?
Foreclosure? Do I have authority to foreclose by unpaid sewer bills? On 7 poor people?
Complete abandonment of the White Forest WWTP will happen within weeks of your
office's giving the go-ahead to C-MUD to construct their new facility. This is a positive
help to those 7 families.
Why can't you find a way to help instead of penalizing innocent people who have been.
caught in a legal web spun by government agencies.
H E Mullis
8033 Hood Rd.
Charlotte, NC 282
White Fores

Michael F. Easley, Gave
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P,E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 5, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7003 2260 0001 3494 6427
Mr. H.E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Case No. LV-2006-0207
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $880.15 ($800.00 civil penalty + $80.15 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data from April 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations and monitoring requirements found in. NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932. The violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest WWT Trust
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against White Forest WWT Trust:
NCDENR
No Carolina
la ura!!ji
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet; Nv v v novtterquality,
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

800.00
For 8 of the eight (8) violation(s) of G.S.
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932, by discharging waste into the waters of
the State in violation of the permit daily maximum
effluent limit for total residual chlorine.
S 800.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
S 80.15 Enforcement costs.
880.15 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

OR.
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed.
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after

the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
'ou ma wish to consider a 1 in for a S ecial Order b Consent. If ou have an uestions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent. please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface. Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
MA

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0207
Pipe No. Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
001 Total residual chlorine *1820 µg/1 28 µg/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine * 1650 µg/1 28 µg/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine * 1920 µg/1 28 µg/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine * 1880 µg/1 28 µg/I (Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine *1110 µg/1 28 µg/1(Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine * 1920 µg/1 28 µg/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine * 1920 µg/1 28 µg/1(Daily maximum)
001 Total residual chlorine * 1850 µg/1 28 µg/1 (Daily maximum)
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMITY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
WHITE FOREST WWT TRUST
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2006-0207
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S880.15 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated July 5, 2006, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2006
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

DWQ — CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: LV-2006-0207
Assessed Entity: White Forest WWT Trust
Region: Mooresville
County: Mecklenburg
()
()
()
Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to
the detriment of the petitioner;
Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
( ) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Decision: (Check One)
Request Denied
I I
Full Remission 1 1 Partial Remission
Amount Remitted
Date Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

Payment
Case Num
Remission
Permit: INC[1t]6632
Petition
Facility: White ForestWIP
Owner: hite Forest MT
CentralOffice Login Date:.07106/2006
CentralOffice Contact: 2Sledge, Robert
Regional Contact: Alloeco‘Marciaa
Enforcement Contact:
Penalty Assessed Date: 0710512006
Letter Date: 07105d2006
Penalty Amount: ,800.00
Damages:
Enforcement Cost: 8C1A15
Total Case Penalty: $850.1
Facility Received F&D: 07d06120
Response Due By: 00105120
ron be
Related Violations
NOV:
nwide In
AD: trlril:.
Region: Mooresville
mw` Incident:
Comments: Users connec
112112010. R.
Remission Request
Remission Acknowledged:
Ent Conf. Date:
Remission Amount:
Enf. Conf. Letter Date:
Facitlty Revd. Enf. Conf. Ltr.:
Total Amount Paid:
Next > finish
nts Events
Penat Assessed jReview
Monitoring Report: 04-2006
County: Mecklenburg
Inspect Dt:
!IUD. Facility closed ou Permii V_ n
ut. Permit rescin
Salutation for Letter:
EMC Hearing Date:
Remission Amount:
EMC Results Received:
Petition in OAH:
Remission Amount:
Case to Collection: Lrr11212007
Settlement Requested:
'iPage 111 S1D:ENCS

Michael F. Easley, Gove
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 2, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 2260 0001 3493 9351
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H.E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Case No. LV-2006-0166
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1078.95 ($1000.00 civil penalty + $78.95 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data from March 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations and monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932. The violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest WWT Trust
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against White Forest WWT Trust:
AVAA
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: www,ncwatertutality,org
Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
On
Carolina
orally
Customer Service
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

1000.00
For 10 of the ten (10) of violations of G.S.
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932, by discharging waste into the waters of
the State in violation of the permit daily maximum
effluent limit for total residual chlorine.
$ 1000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 78.95 Enforcement costs.
$ 1078.95 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment ofthe penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

OR
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.

Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. if you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1.699.
D. Rex Glean, P.E.
Surface Water Protection. Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
JL

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0166
Pipe No. Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
001 TRC * 1950 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1250 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1950 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1720 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1850 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1720 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1880 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1750 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1920 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1520 ug/1 28 ug/1
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
WHITE FOREST WWT TRUST
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV -2006-0166
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1078.95 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated June 2, 2006 , the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2006
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

DWQ — CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: LV-2006-0166
Assessed Entity: White Forest WWT Trust
Region: Mooresville
County: Mecklenburg
(
(
(
) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to
the detriment of the petitioner;
) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;,
) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
()
Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
( ) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Decision: (Check One)
Request Denied jj Full Remission
Partial Remission Amount Remitted
Date Alan W. Klimek , P.E.

Payment° Rem
e Num
Permit:
Facility:
Owner:
ries administration help
Petition {{ t ollection Settlement Related Case. I Comments � Events _
Related\tfotations Penalty Assessed ( Review
NOV:2
SOC: AD:
_..._._ Monitoring Report `03-2006
Fztrestba(P Deat4s Region: aeresville County: Mecklenburg
ForestVVWTTrust eta}ntain,. }ncident: ( Details, InspectDt:
entralOffice Login Date:
6I2006--
CentralOffice Contact: iSledge, Robert
Regional Contact: jLesley, John E.
Enforcement Contact
Penalty Assessed Date: 0610222006
Letter Date: •0610212006�
Penalty Amount: 1000.00
Damages:
Enforcement Cost: $78.95
Total Case Penalty: ;$1070.c3
Facility Received F&D: 061101200
Response Due By: 07f`10120i0
Comments
Remission Request:
Remission Acknowledged:
Enf. Conf. Date:
Remission Amount:
Enf, Conf. Letter Date:
Facility Rcvd. Enf. Conf. Ltr.:
T t1
Total Amount Paid:
6rnittook effect 1-1-06 .. over Is aware of requirement for
hlorination.
rrs connected to CMVD. Facility closed out. Permit rescinde
11010_ RS
Salutation for Letter:
EMC Hearing Date:
Remission Amount:
EMC Results Received:
Petition in OAH:
Remission Amount
Case to Collection:
Settlement Requested:
°jSID: ENOS

Michael F. Easley, Gov
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P,E. Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
April 25, 2006
7003 2260 0001 3493 9047
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H.E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Case No. LV-2006-0112
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $778.95 ($700.00 civil penalty + $78.95 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data from February 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations and monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932. The violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest WWT Trust
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the mariner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against White Forest WWT Trust:
A.VA
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: www.novaterqualitv.org
Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
Customer Service
Carolina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

700.00
For 7 of the seven (7) of violations of G.S.
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932, by discharging waste into the waters of
the State in violation of the permit daily maximum
effluent limit for total residual chlorine.
$ 700.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 78.95 Enforcement costs.
$ 778.95 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

OR
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action,

Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.
z-S Z�°�
� /(7.
(Date) D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
JL

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0112
Pipe No. Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
001 TRC * 1850 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1900 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1500 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 800 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1900 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1820 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1550 ug/1 28 ug/1
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
WHITE FOREST WWT TRUST
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV -2006-0112
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $778.95 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated April 25, 2006 , the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2006
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

DWQ — CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: LV-2006-0112
Assessed Entity: White Forest WWT Trust
Region: Mooresville
County: Mecklenburg
) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to
the detriment of the petitioner;
) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
()
()
Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
( ) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Decision: (Check One)
Request Denied
Full Remission
Partial Remission 1 1 Amount Remitted
Date Alan W. Klimek , P.E.

ueries
Track Enforcement Case
'Payment —'Remission
e Num
Permit: 0063932 P+tailc
Facility: 'MVttite Forest4"
Owner: fite ForestWVVTTrust
ntral©ffice Login Date: 01Ct112006
CentralOffce Contact: Sledge,yRobert
Regional Contact: Lesley,John E
Enforcement Contact:
Penalty Assessed Date:
Letter Date:
Penalty Amount:
Damages:
041251200
70
Enforcement Cost: $70.95
Total Case Penalty: $778.95;'��
Facility Received F&D: 05/0212006
Response Due By: 0610112006
Mooresville.
Related
NOV:
S©C:
AD:
Region:
Incident:
Comments:
Remission Request:
Remission Acknowledged:
Enf. Conf. Date:
Remission Amount:
Enf. Conf. Letter Date:
Facility Revd, Enf. Conf. Ltr.:
Total Amount Paid:
Events
Penalty Assessed,
Monitoring Report:
County:
Inspect Dt:
2-2006
ecklenburg
Users connected to CMUD. Facility closed out. Permit rescinded
112112010. RS
Next e Finish
jReady
Salutation for Letter:
EMC Hearing Date:
Remission Amount:
EMC Results Received:
Petition in OAH:
Remission Amount:
Case to Collection:
lement Requested:
Page 1i1 'SID: ENCS

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 25, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 2260 0001 3493 9054
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H.E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General. Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Case No, LV-2006-0111
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $978.95 ($900.00 civil penalty + $78.95 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data from January 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations and monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932. The violations are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest WWT Trust
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against White Forest WWT Trust:
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional office Division of Water Quality
Internet: MIN w.ne vaterqualitv.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
N'orthCaro ina
Naturally
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

900.00
For 9 of the nine (9) violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit daily maximum effluent
limit for total residual chlorine.
$ 900.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 78.95 Enforcement costs.
$ 978.95 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

OR
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.

Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to
operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.
(Date)
ATTACHMENTS
r
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
JL

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0111
Pipe No. Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
001 TRC * 1800 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1500 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1900 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 • TRC * 1100 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1820 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1550 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 500 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1800 ug/1 28 ug/1
001 TRC * 1250 ug/1 28 ug/1
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
WHITE FOREST WWT TRUST
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV -2006-0111
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $978.95 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated April 25, 2006 , the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2006
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

DWO — CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: LV-2006-0111
Assessed Entity: White Forest WWT Trust
Region: Mooresville
County: Mecklenburg
( ) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to
the detriment of the petitioner;
(
(
) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
()
Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
( ) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Decision: (Check One)
Request Denied 1 1 Full Remission
Prti
Remission
Amount Remitted
Date Alan W. Klimek , P.E.

NORTH CAROL/NA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
610 EAST CENTER AVENUE, SUITE 301
MOORESVILLE,;'G 28115
3493 9054
R
HITE FOREST W s RUT
6116 I-ONEYSU- -CKLE LAN El
CHARLOTTE NC 212124
NIXIE 25.e.
DC:
1 34 05/2 05
RETURN TO SENDER
UNCLAIMED
UNADLE TO FORWARD
2)j01j15257976 *0140•-,006'tsi�y7--25—
IJIHJ MH IIIH III IJI113 I,III�I•t tttt It L Irrr rtirx ..«

` Track Enforcement
Case
Remission
ueries Administration
Petition Collection
Case Numbb�
Permit: `NC00f33932tail
Facility: ite FcrretP
Owner: White Forest Mil'
CentralOffice Login Date: 05/0112006,
CentralOftice Contact: "'Sledge Robert L.
Regional Contact: Lesiey,John E.
Enforcement Contact
Penalty Assessed Date: 0412512'00
Letter Date: 04/251200
PenaltyAmount: 900.00
Damages:
Enforcement Cost: $78,95
Total Case Penalty. $978,95
Facility Received F&D:
Response Due By:
OM 11200
rnent
Related violations
NOV:
Details,...
Maintain
Related Cases
AD:
Region:
Incident:
Comments
Remission Request:
Remission Acknowledged:
Enf Conf, Date:
Remission Amount:
Ern`, ConfLetter Date:
Facility Rcvd, Enf. Conf. Ltr.:
Total Amount Paid:
easinwide inforrnatio,.,
Uext
Events_
naiiv Assessed
Monitoring Report:
County:
Inspect Dt:
Mecklenburg
Revie
Users connected to CMUD. Facility closed out. Permit rescinded
112112010. RS
1Ready
Salutation for Letter.
EMC Hearing Date:
Remission Amount:
EMC Results Received:
Petition in OAH:
Remission Amount:
Case to Collection:
Settlement Requested:
Page 111 SiD: ENCS

47ic^aef F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross. Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P.E, Director
Division of Water Quality
4:wL
NCDENR
March 4, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7001 2510 0004 8287 7941
Mr: H.E.Mullis
White Forest ' WT Trust
116-J Freeland Lane
Charlotte, NC 28217
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil.
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Case No. LV 03-167
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $335.45 ($250.00 civil penalty + $85.45 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by White Forest WWT Trust for the month of
October 2002. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the discharge
limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0063932. The violations are summarized in
Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest WWT Trust
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2 ).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason., Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment
against White Forest WWT Trust:
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville. NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 627,-7748
FAX [phone]

tr0-
85.45
For / of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit daily maximum effluent
limit for Fecal Coliform,
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 14313-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:

A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violations;
(c) the violations were inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violation;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality wi
review the information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform
you of his decision in the matter of the remission request. His response will
provide details regarding case status, directions for payment and provision for
further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management Commission's
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that the Committee
cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a
complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
OR
Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:

File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
d
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this civil
penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704/663-1699.
/21 ' (-2-J .%?- _
(Date) D. Re leason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
RMB

Attachment A
White Forest WWT Trust
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Case Number LV 03-167
Limit Violations, October 2002
Daily Maximum Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit Units
Fecal Coliform 550 * 400 #/100 ml
* denotes assessment of civil penalty.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Mecklenburg
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
White Forest WWT Trust
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO I VIE:
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF
AD�STRATIVE HEARING
) AND STIPULAHON OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 03-167
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quai,ity dated
, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be
submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days
from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of 2003
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant tr
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc,. and a time table for
improvements to be made.
641 C4114r4.K t01 z4 (o Z. Sso Aio 44r 77 4y- vcia 14-! ,u. -f .a r2
: ....•44 'j`T L. 4-4
4-..a /' L—t 5o t ;�' �n • �x u k k—e . �f- �4- Po-- �•, �� ,
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my directions or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and compleate. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment
for knowing violations."
Kevin Curl
Permittee (Plea
Signatureof Permittee"
107 Commercial Park Drive , Concord, NC 28027 704-788-9497
Permittee Address Phone Number
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 B0D5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended
Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total IGeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/ Nitrifies
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
PARAMETER CODES
pe)
00951 Total Fluoride 01092 Zinc
01002 Total Arsenic 01105 Aluminum
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent
Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
01034 Chromium 31616 Fecal Coliform
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
32730 Total Phenolics
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Row
4
Date
Permit Exp. Date
50060 Total
Residual
Chlorine
71880
Forrnaldehy
71900
Mercury
81551
Xylene
Parameter code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534
' ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A .0202 (b) (5) (B).
The monthly average for fecal coiiform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use onty units designated in the reporting facility's permit for
reporting data.
If Signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 28 .0506 (b) (2) (D).
OLC Form-2 121100

1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration.
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
Flow
Monthly
Average
0.017 MGD
LIMITS
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Measurement
Frequency
Weekly
Sample Type
Instantaneous
Sample Location'
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day (20°C)
30.0 mgiL
45.0 ma'L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Residue
30.0 mQ/L
45.0 mgiL
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 — October 31)
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1 — March 31)
Dissolved Oxvoe
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 mi
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Grab
Grab
Effluent
Effluent.
Upstream &
Downstream
Effluent,
Upstream &
Downstream
Total Residual Chlorine
a'Week
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
Da
y
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
Weekly
Grab
Upstream 3 .
Downstream
pH2
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Upstream: 100 feet from discharge point: Downstream: 100 feet from discharge point.
2. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts

Case Number
LV
03
Fast Track Worksheet
167
Facility Name
Permit Number
Previous Case
in the Last
two years
White Forest WWTP
NC0063932
Statutory Maximun
per violation
Number of Assessments for previous 6 DMRs
0 20 03 0 40 0
1.00
I $25,000
Total Assessment Factor =
Total
Number Number Penalty/ Assessment
Violations Assessed Parameter Violation Violation Factor Total Penalty
Fecal Coliform
Comments
Weekly avg/daiiy
max.
$250
Grand Total Penalty
Percent of the Maximum Penalty
Authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$250.00
$250.00
Prepared by Richard Bridgeman

sks:Queries dtxiinist
Track Enforcement Case
Payment Remission Petiti
rHimt't�ir �
Case Numb
Permit: N0063932
Facility: WhiteryForest WWTP
Owner: White ForestWWTTrust,
tin Settlement
Related Violations
CentralOffice Login Date; 07120/2004
CentralOffce Contact: pledge, RobertL:
.LL
Regional Contact Bnd0eman Richard
Enforcement Contact
Penalty Assessed Date: 03/041200
Letter Date: 3t041200
Penalty Amount: $26Q.00r
Damages:
Enforcement Cost:
Total Case Penalty.
Facility Received F&D: i03105I2003
Response Due By: 0410412003
asinkNide
Region:
ain.., [ Incident:
Comments:
Comments Events
Penalty Assessed
Mooresvill
Remission Request.
Remission Acknowledged:
Enf, Conf. Date:
Remission Amount:
Enf. Conf. Letter Date:
Facility Rcvd, Enf. Conf. Ltr:
Total Amount Pald
Monitoring Report: '10-2002.
County: h4ecklenburg
inspect Dt:
sers connected to CMUD. Facility dosed out. Permit rescinded
Review
Salutation for Letter.
EMC Hearing Date:
Remission Amount:
EMC Results Received:
Petition in OAH:
Remission Amount:
Case to Collection:
lement Requested:
aae 'l11 jSID: ENCS

INVOICE
Remit to:
Dustin K. Metreyeon
d.b.a. Metwater Con-ops
1000 Woodhurst Drive
Monroe NC 28110
704.283.0909 home
704.506.4255 cell
Dmetwateroi.cttm email
Bill to:
Gene Mullis
clo White Forest WWTP Decommission
8033 Hood Road
Charlotte NC 28215
ph: 704.634.7991
10/15/2007
IVF001
Job contact: Gene Mullis
Date:
Project Management and Consultation regarding the pumping and cleaning out of the White Forest WWTP for ultimate abandonment by owner:
10/3/2007 Bio-Tech pump. Clean and haul to disposal at CMUD specified facility
Sept / Oct. 07 Metwater project manager set up and follow to completion necessary pump and haul activity
$1,300.00
3260.00
Total this invoice S1,660.00

State of North Carolina
Utilities Commission
Mailing Address
4325 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-4325
COMMISSIONERS
EDWARD S. FINLEY, JR., Chairman
ROBERT V. ©WENS, JR.
SAMUEL J. ERVIN, IV
LORINZO L. JOYNER
July 8, 2008
Rebecca Brock
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
Mail Code NC -Cary 3140
1400 Crescent Green Drive, Suite 120
Cary, NC 27518
COMMISSIONERS
JAMES YANCEY KERR, II
HOWARD N. LEE
WILLIAM THOMAS CULPEPPER, III
Re: Release of Certificate of Deposit for W-1157, Sub 1 (Harold E. Mullis, d/b/a White Forest
Wastewater Treatment)
Dear Rebecca:
Enclosed please find the commission's June 5, 2008 order approving the cancellation of the
Harold E. Mullis, d/b/a White Forest Wastewater Treatment sewer utility service franchise. This
order also releases the $10,000 BB&T certificate of deposit surety. Please release the certificate of
deposit to Mr. Mullis.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Renne Vance
Chief Clerk
NC Utilities Commission
cc: Harold E. Mullis
enclosure

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
RALEIGH
DOCKET NO. W-1157, SUB 1
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
In the Matter of
Harold E. Mullis, d/b/a White Forest Wastewater
Treatment, 116-J Freeland Lane, Charlotte, North
Carolina 28217, for Authority to Cancel Franchise for
Sewer Utility Service in White Forest Subdivision in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ORDER
CANCELING
FRANCHISE AND
CLOSING DOCKET
BY THE COMMISSION: On September 18, 2006, Harold E. Mullis, d/b/a White
Forest Wastewater Treatment (Applicant), filed a letter with the Commission seeking
authority to discontinue sewer utility service in White Forest Subdivision in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina.
On October 10, 2006, the Commission issued an Order Requiring Customer
Notice in which the remaining customers were given a deadline for connecting to the
new Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities sewer line. The Applicant has notified the Public
Staff and the Commission that all customers have disconnected from the Applicant's
system. The Public Staff has recommended that an Order be issued granting the
Applicant's request to discontinue sewer service and closing the docket.
Based upon the foregoing, the Commission is of the opinion that an order should
be issued granting the request to discontinue sewer utility service, canceling the
franchise, returning the bond and surety previously filed, and closing the docket.
rb60408,64
IT IS, THEREFORE, SO ORDERED.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION.
This the 5th day of June , 2008.
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
4t. L.Mourn*
Gail L. Mount, Deputy Clerk

c
September 12, 2007
Mr. Gene Mullis
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28215
©TTESM
Subject: Temporary Pump and Haul for removal of domestic wastewater
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter is in reply to your request to pump and haul domestic wastewater from the de -commissioned, NPDES #
NC0063932 , White Forest wastewater treatment plant.
Permission to discharge to septage facilities located at McAlpine Creek (NPDES #NC0024970) or Irwin Creek (NPDES
#NC0024945) Treatment Facilities is granted for domestic wastewater only from the White Forest wastewater treatment
plant.
In addition, the following conditions shall apply:
1. you must use a N.C. Solid Waste permitted waste hauler to pump and haul the wastewater
from the site indicated above.
2. The firm must be on the approved list for entry into the CMU system.
3. The hauler must adhere to all procedures and Sewer Use Ordinances pertaining to hauled
waste in the CMU system.
If you have any questions, or for further assistance, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tirn Downs
Environmental Compliance Supervisor
System Protection
Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
System Protection Division 5100 Brookshire Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28216 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities

Current Address for White Forest WWTP
H. E. Mullis
8033 Hood Road
Charlotte, NC 28215
704-634-7991

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
CERTIFIED
Gene Mullins
8033 Hood Rd
Charlotte, NC
Dear Per tee:
June 18, 2008
TEM 7002 0860 0006 5836 0083 - RETURN ItECEIP'T REQUESTED
28215
Subject: Notice of Vaco
LL1l
Failure to Submit Renewal Application
NPDES Permit NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
The subject permit's expiration date is November 30, 2008. Federal [40 CFR 122] and state (15A
NCAC 2H.0105 (e)) regulations require that an application for permit renewal be filed at least 180 days prior
to expiration of the current permit. To satisfy this requirement, your renewal package should have been
sent to the Division postmarked no later than June 3, 2008.
As of this date, the Division has not received your renewal application. This is a violation of Part II.
B. 10. of your permit, which states "Any permittee that has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to
expiration...will subject the permittee to enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS 143-215.6 and 33
USC 1251 et. seq.". To prevent an assessment of civil penalties you must submit a completed
permit application (see enclosed forms) no later than July 3, 2008.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you
must submit with the permit renewal application. If all wastewater discharge from your facility has ceased
and you wish to rescind this permit [or if you have any questions] please contact Charles H. Weaver of my
staff. His telephone number, fax number and e-mail address are listed at the bottom of this page.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
SUSAN A. WILSON
Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Central File
NPDES File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone], extension 511 / FAX [phone] / [e-mail]
N©rthCar©lina
77aturallri
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

NPDES Permit NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
o A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the
facility since issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an
Authorized Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental
consultant) prepares the renewal package, submit written documentation showing the
authority delegated to any such Authorized Representative (see Part II.B.11.b of the
existing NPDES permit).
o A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how
sludge (or other solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and
disposed. If your facility has no such plan (or the permitted facility does not generate
any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed original and two copies.
The following item must be submitted by Industrial or Municipal facilities
discharging industrial process wastewater:
o Industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of
the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 122) must submit a Priority Pollutant Analysis
(PPA) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21. If the PPA cannot be completed by the
time you complete your application package, submit the application package without
the PPA. Submit the PPA as soon as possible after you receive the completed analyses.
The above requirement does NOT apply to non -industrial facilities.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Gene Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
116-J Freeland Ln
Charlotte, NC
Dear Permittee:
28217
April 2, 2008
Subject: Renewal Notice
NPDES Permit NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Your NPDES permit expires on November 30, 2008. Federal (40 CFR 122.41) and North Carolina
(15A NCAC 2H.0105 (e)) regulations state that permit renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days
prior to expiration of the current permit. If you have already mailed your renewal application, you
may disregard this notice.
Your renewal package must be sent to the Division postmarked no later than June 3, 2008. Failure
to request renewal by this date may result in a civil penalty assessment. Larger penalties may be assessed
depending upon the delinquency of the request.
If any wastewater discharge will occur after November 30, 2008, the current permit must be
renewed. Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1; unpermitted discharges of wastewater may be assessed civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact
me at the telephone number or address listed below.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you
must submit with the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me at the
telephone number or e-mail address listed below.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver,
NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
NPDES File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone], extension 511 / FAX [phone] / charles‘[e-mail]
APR
ne, don
Nortnuaro
Natural!,
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

NPDES PERMIT NC0063932
WHITE FOREST WWTP
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
o A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to any
such Authorized Representative (see Part ILB.11.b of the existing NPDES permit).
o A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies.
The following items must be submitted by any Municipal or Industrial facilities discharging
process wastewater:
Industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 122) and ALL Municipal facilities with a permitted flow >_ 1.0 MGD must submit a
Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21.
The above requirement does NOT apply to privately owned facilities treating 100%
domestic wastewater, or facilities which discharge non process wastewater (cooling
water, filter backwash, etc.)
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 13, 2006
Mecklenburg County Sheriffs Office
700 Fast 41" Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Re: NOTICE OF SERVICE
H.E. Mullis
Dear Sheriff:
Please serve the attached correspondence as follows:
H.E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
It is our understanding that because we are a State agency, no fee is required for this service. We would
appreciate your returning the completed Return of Service form in the return envelope provided herein.
The SWP Section appreciates this assistance from your department. Should you have any questions, please
contact me at [phone], ext. 2204.
Sincerely,
Marcia Allocco
Environmental Chemist
Enclosures
ATA
P4CDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: wwyjrjjgiljtyorg
Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
om
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REJEST
Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Dear Mr. Mullis:
William G. Ross Jr_, Seem tan
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
r?ivis€on of Water Quality
August 1 1 , 2006
7003 2260 0001 3494 6762
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-21.5.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0©6932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Case No, LV-2006-0294
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $1, )80.15 ($1,000.00 civil penalty + $80.1.5 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of th.e
self -monitoring data from May 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0063932. The violations
are summarized. in Attachment A to this letter,
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest WWT Trust
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC006932 and North
Carolina. General Statute (G.S.) 143-21.5.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed, in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, 1, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against White Forest WWT Trust:
71
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: www,novatcrqualitv.orL
Onc
N% thCarolina
Vatrlr'al y
Division of Water Quality
610 Fast Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 281 15 Fax [phone]
Phone [phone] Customer Service
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

1,000,00
1,000.00
80.15
1,080. 5
For 8 of the eight (8) violation(s) of G.S.
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No.
NC0063932, by discharging waste into the waters of
the State in violation of the permit daily maximum
effluent limit for total residual chlorine.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement 'Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR

Submit a written request for re
such request:
ion including a detailed justification for
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of thepetitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
I'lea.se note that all information presented in support of your request for remi lion
rtnustt be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative hearing and. Stipulation of Facts" fbrin
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted. to the following address:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
161.7 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1.617
OR
File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you
must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition
form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with.
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letterthe)
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. If th.e violations are of a oj jrmingnature, not related. to

operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider appl 'n fora. Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.
D. Rex
Surface Water Protection. Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional. Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACfIMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
MA

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0294
Pipe Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
No.
001 Residual chlorine *1,850 i_tg/1 (Daily maximum) 28 [tg/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine *1,800 vig/I (Daily maximum) 28 vig/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine *1,950 i_ig/1 (Daily maximum) 28 p.g/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine * 1,320 Kg/1 (Daily maximum) 28 ug/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine *1,880 i.ig/1 (Daily maximum) 28 p,g/l (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine *1,330 yig/I (Daily maximum) 28 pg/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine *650 vtg/1 (Daily maximum) 28 [ig/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Residual chlorine * 1,920 vig/1 (Daily maximum) 28 [10 (Daily maximum)
* Denotes civil penalty assessment

STATE OF NORTH CAR©LINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINNST
WHITE FOREST WWT TRUST
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
E NO. LV-2006-0294
laving been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,080.15 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assesdocument of the Division of Water Quality dated August 11, 2006, the undersigned.,
desiring to seek remission of the civilpenalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of , 2006
AD ,SS
BY
ENE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: LV-2006-0294
Assessed Party: White Forest wwr Trust
County: Mecklenburg
Permit Number: NC0063932
Amount Assessed: $1,080.15
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty, You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and .5tipulation (0-acts"
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limitedto consideration of the five factors
listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civii penalty assessed.
Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or
the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document.
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or
more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your
case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed),
(a) one o iore of the civitpenalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment actors are listed in the civil
penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated. continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent o a .esult of an accident (i.e., explain why the violation
was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare Ibr );
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for_anyTrevious violations;
(e) payment of the civil_pen.alty will prevent payment fort rernajjing necessary
remedial actions (i. e., explain how payment o • the civil penalty will prevent. youfrom performing the
activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: se additional pages as necessaty)

NCDENR.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OP
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
6/0 EAST CENTER AVENUE, SUITE 50 I
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION
7003 2260 0001, 3494 6762
H.E. MULLIS
WHITE FOREST WWT TRUST
611.6 HONEYSUCKLE LANE
CHAR

Performance Annual Report
General. Information
Facility/System Name White Forest
Responsible Entity: White Forest WWT Trust
Person in Charge/Contact: Aqua North Carolina, Inc. is contract operator
Applicable Permit (s): 1y
C0063932
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
This 0.017 mgd wastewater treatment facility consists of a bar screen,
aeration tank, clarifier, aerated sludge holding tank and chlorination.
II. Performance
Text Summary of System Performance for Calendar Year 2005:
This plant consistently met discharge permit limits in 2005.
List (by month) any violations of permit conditions or other environmental
regulations. Monthly lists should include discussion of any environmental
impacts and corrective measures taken to address violations.
January Compliant
February Compliant
March Compliant
April Compliant

May
Compliant
June Compliant
July Comp 1 iant
August Compliant
September Compliant
October Compliant
November Compliant
December Compliant
IL Notification
This report was sent to the owner of the wastewater facility for distribution.
III. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the
best of my knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available
to the users or customers of the named system and that those users have been,
notified of its availability.
Date: 2/14/06
Responsib erson
Title: Regional Manager, Engineering & Compliance
Entity: Aqua North Carolina, Inc.

North Carolina
November 2, 2006
Barbara Sifford
Division of Water Quality
MooresvilleRegional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
4163 Sinclair Street
Denver, NC 28037
Subject: Aqua North Carolina, Western Division
Annual Report
Barbara,
AND
MOORE
T: 704,489.0401 c s .o'Jr
F: 7©4.489.94©9
www.aquanorthcarolina.com
NOV 0 6 200
I have enclosed a copy of our 2005 Annual Reports. As we discussed, I will add you to
the distribution list for our 2006 reports.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at [phone], Extension 228.
hank
A Welborn
Envrrtsn ental Coordinator
Enclosure
An Aqua America Company

Neil R- Phillips
President Aq-ua North Carolina/Heater Utilities
V
Norte Car a[in
June 1, 2005
Jessica Miles
Public Water Supply Section Chief
1634 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634
Alan Klimek, P.E.
Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Delegation of Signature Authority
Aqua North Carolina
. 202 VfacKenan Ct.
t , North Carolina 77.511
T: 919.467 _S7L'
F:919.461178S
ern,ul: nreht11ipshaauaatme ie
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter delegating authority tosign on my behalf all permit applicaticrlsw,
reports, and other agency correspondence to Michael J. Myers. I currently hold the
position of President of Aqua North Carolina and Heater Utilities along with being a'ice
President of Aqua America and have the authority to delegate these activities to Mr.
Myers. Mr. Myers currently holds the position of Engineering and Compliance Manager
for Aqua North Carolina and Heater Utilities. This delegation of signature authority
meant to fulfill the requirements of NCAC 2H .4106 (e), NCAC 2H .0206 (b)(1), and
various permit conditions.
Thank you. Aqua North Carolina and Heater Ullties look, forward to working with
your agencies in the future. If you have any quest1ons, please do not hestiate to contact
either myself or Michael Myers using the contact information above.
sident
Aqua North Carolina, SnclHeater
Cc: Bill Reid, Wake County Envirott
David Goodrich, Division of Vat
Kim Colson, Division of Water Q
Wayne Munden, Public Water Su
Michael Myers
Blythe Cliffi5rd
Robyn Thomas
ntal Services
Quality
lity
ly

AOUA
North Caroling
Compliance & Engineering Department
Aqua North Carolina T: 919.467.8712
202 MacKenan Ct. F: 919.466.1583
Cary, North Carolina 27511
July 18, 2005
Regional Supervisor Rex Gleason
NCDENR
610 East Center Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: Declaration of Signature Authority
Dear Regional Supervisor Gleason,
Find enclosed correspondence indicating that Michael Myers is able to sign permit
applications, reports, and other agency correspondence. Should there be any questions,
do not hesitate to call me at [phone] ext. 47 ©r Michael Myers ext. 706.
En
Encl.
s Harvey
and Compliance
cc: Michael Myers, Engineering and Compliance Manager

AQUA NORTH CAROLINA WASTEWATER FACILITIES
SUBDIVISION
COUNTY
NPDES #
Country Valley
Catawba
NC0058742 JX
Killians Crossroads
Catawba
NC0063355 X
Spinnaker Bay
Catawba
NC0060593
Alexander Island
Iredell
NC0075205 x
Castaway/Bridgeport
Iredell
NC0056154 i
Diamond Head
Iredell
NC0074772 4.
Hwy 150 (River Park)
Iredell
NC0074900X
Mallard Head
iredell
NC0062481 FX
Pier 16
Iredell
NC0074535
Windemere
Iredell
NC0080691
Mecklenburg
NC0065749 J<
Ashe Plantatation
Harbor Estates
Mecklenburg
NC0063860
McCarron
Mecklenburg
Mecklenburg
NC0071781,
NC0063789'�
Mint Hill Festival
Oxford Glen /Reigate
Mecklenburg
Mecklenburg
NC0063584`j
NC0063932 X
�d�1atr,ots
Willowbrook
Mecklenburg
NC0073539 ?<.
Willows Creek
Mecklenburg
NC0065773
Pine Valley
Rowan
NC0028941 '
Country Woods East
Union
NC0065684 (WQCS00322) '
Public Water Systems - Backwash Systems
SUBDIVISION
COUNTY
NPDES#
Fox Run
Gaston
NC0072061
Keltic Meadows
Gaston
NC0084468 "{
Maplecrest
Gaston
NC0086193
Oakley Park
Gaston
NC0086142
Southgate
Gaston
NC0069035"
11/2/2006

*41
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Dear Mr. Mullis:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
April 13, 2005
7003 2260 0001 3551 8586
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking #: NOV-2005-00-PC-0054
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County, NC
On March 24, 2005, Mr. Jeff Price of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part
of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water
Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because of the noted
violations of the subject permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as detailed
under the Self -Monitoring Program section heading. It is requested that a written response be
submitted to this Office by no later, than Mav 6t 2005, addressing the violations and/or
deficiencies noted under the Records/Reports, Facility Site Review, Self -Monitoring Program
and Operations/Maintenance section headings of the report. Please direct your response to Mr.
Richard Bridgman of this Office. Additionally, please send a copy of this response to Mr. Rusty
Rozzelle of MCWQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202.
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
N©rthCarolina
Naturally

Mr. H. E. Mullis
Page Two
April 13, 2005
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at this office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
urface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Neil Phillips President Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
700 N. Regional Rd.
Greensboro, NC 27409
DRG/jsp
FILE: White Forest.N00063932.0305.doc

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460 Form Approved
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report ©A OMB No. 2040-0003
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 7 Approval Expires
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office NC©ENR 7/31/85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NC0063932 05/03/24 C C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
nspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
1.0 2 y N N
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd,
Mecklenburg County, NC
Entry Time:
02:00 pm
Exit Time:
02:38 am
Date:
March 24, 2005
Permit Effective Date:
my 1, 2004
Expiratio
November 30, 2008
Name(s) of On -Site Representative / Title(s) / Phone No(s):
Kevin Curl / ORC / Aqua North Carolina, Inc, [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible 0
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Title:
Owner
Phone No.
[phone]
Contacted?
No
ction C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
® Permit ® Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance ® Sewer Overflow
® Records/Reports ® Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling/Disposal [1] Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program
g ©Multimedia
Effluent/Receiving Waters ® Laboratory 0 Stormwater © Other:
Section D: Sum
Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector
Price
Agency/Office/Telephone:
MCWQP / [phone]
Da
April 1, 2005
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/office
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected by MCWQP on March 4, 2004. A Compliance Evaluation
Inspection Report was issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) on March 23, 2004.
PERMIT:
The previous permit became effective on January 1, 2001, and expired on November 30,
2003. The facility continued to operate under the previous permit requirements until June 30,
2004. A new permit was issued on July 1, 2004 and will expire November 30, 2008.
The existing 0.017 MGD facility is an extended aeration package wastewater treatment
plant with a bar screen, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, sludge holding tank, tablet
chlorinator, and chlorine contact tank.
Mr. Kevin Curl was the Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) throughout the period of
review. Mr. Curl maintains a North Carolina Operators Certification Grade IV, which is
acceptable for the class of the facility. Mr. Curl's Certification Number is 9457.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period January 2004
through January 2005. Visitation and process control records are kept on -site in a logbook. All
records appeared to be complete except that DMRs dated January and May 2004 incorrectly
identified the facility's compliance status.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
All of the existing components of the facility were operational at the time of the
inspection. The clarifier appeared very murky and considerable pin floc was noted. This problem
had been observed during the previous two inspections (2003, 2004). In previous inspections, the
ORC reportedly changed the operational set times on the blower cycles in order to address the
situation (allow for increased settling times). This did not appear to resolve the problem. During
this inspection, the ORC stated that inflow and infiltration (INI) from recent storm events may
have impacted the treatment system. No effluent was discharged during the inspection.
RATING: Unsatisfactory
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
The ORC estimates the flow based on effluent head at the v-notch weir. A permanently
attached staff gauge has been installed at the v-notch in order to ensure accurate, repeatable
readings.

LABORATORY:
Aqua North Carolina Inc. (formerly AquaSource) operated a NC State Certified
Laboratory for the analysis of wastewater (NC Certification No. 365). AquaSource was also
State Certified for the collection of field parameters. All compliance samples collected for
analysis at the White Forest facility were submitted to the AquaSource Lab. The lab has now
closed and was not evaluated during this inspection. All future samples for analysis will be sent to
Water Tech Labs, Inc. (NC State Certification #50) in Granite Falls, NC.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to Reedy Creek, which is a Class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. No effluent was discharged to the receiving stream during the inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period January 2004
through January 2005. The reports indicate that the facility was in compliance with monitoring
frequencies and permit effluent limits, as monitored during the review period, except for the
following:
1. Two (2) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) values, one reported on January 6 and
one reported on May 12, 2004, were flagged with QA/QC notations indicating that the
sample dilutions did not meet the minimum DO depletion requirement. The failed
QA/QC parameters rendered sample analyses invalid and did not allow a determination
of compliance. This constitutes two (2) violations of the subject permit for Failure to
Monitor.
2. One (1) Fecal Coliform value (1100 Co1/100m1) in excess of the daily maximum permit
effluent limit was reported on March 2, 2004. This constitutes one (1) violation, for
which a NOV was issued (NOV-2004-LV-00327).
RATING: Unsatisfactory
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
Visual observations of the clarifier over the past three annual inspections (2003, 2004,
2005) appear to suggest that there are ongoing problems with the operation of the package
treatment system, possibly due to limited biomass or insufficient influent. It is recommended that
you contact Ms. Sonja Basinger (Wastewater Consultant) at the Mooresville Regional Office for
additional guidance and information.
RATING: Unsatisfactory

SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL:
The ORC reports that no solids have been wasted from the facility during the previous 3
periods of review. Piedmont Septic Service of Rowan County is the contracted septage hauler for
this facility.
SEWER OVERFLOW:
Please be advised that pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPDES permit and North
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 2B .0506 (a)(2), any failure of a collection system,
pumping station or treatment facility resulting in a bypass without treatment of all or any portion
of the wastewater shall be reported to the appropriate regional office (Mooresville Regional
Office 704/663-1699) as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours from the time the permittee
becomes aware of the bypass. For spills/bypasses that occur in Mecklenburg County, it is
requested that MCWQP be notified at 704/336-5500. Spills occurring on weekends or holidays
can be reported by calling the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management at 800/662-
7956, 800/858-0368, or 919/733-3300. A written report shall also be provided within five (5)
days of the time of the incident. The report shall contain a description of the bypass, and its
cause; the period of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been
corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken (or planned) to reduce,
eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the similar events. Any spill that reaches surface waters (i.e.
any spill that reaches any water already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc.) or any spill
greater than 1,000 gallons on the ground that does not reach surface waters must be reported.
An adequate spill response for those spills reaching surface waters should include an
evaluation downstream of the point at which the spill entered surface waters to determine if a fish
kill occurred. The evaluation should also include the collection of upstream dissolved oxygen and
pH measurements for background information and dissolved oxygen and pH measurements at
multiple points downstream of the entry point to document any negative impact. Failure to report
the bypass of collection system, pumping station or treatment facility subjects violators to
penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day per violation.

u

n:m:nuumuirm

Performance Annual Report
General Information
Facility/System Name White Forest
Responsible Entity: White Forest Vi T Trust
Person in Charge/Contact: Aqua North Carolina, Inc. is contract operator
Applicable Permit (s):
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
This 0.017 mgd wastewater treatment facility consists of a bar screen,
aeration tank, clarifier, aerated sludge holding tank and chlorination.
II. Performance
Text Summary of System Performance for Calendar Year 2004
This plant has met discharge permit limits with one exception as noted.
List (by month) any violations of permit conditions or other environmental
regulations. Monthly lists should include discussion of any environmental
impacts and corrective measures taken to address violations.
January Compliant
February Compliant
March The daily Fecal Coliform maximum limit of 400 colonies
per 100 ml was exceeded with a result of 1100 colonies per
100 ml.

April Compliant
May Compliant
June Compliant
July Compliant
August Compliant
September Compliant
October Compliant
November Compliant
December Compliant
II. Notification
This report has been made available to the owner of the system for distribution.
III. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the
best of my knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available
to the users or customers of the named system and that those users have been
notified of its availability.
Date: 2/2/05
Responsible Person
Title: Compliance & Engineering Manager
Entity: Aqua North Carolina, Inc.

North Caroline Department on,
M
William G. Ro. s Jr.. Secretary
nment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek.. I'. fT I)irectnr
Division or Water Quality
Colocn H. Sullins. r)eputy t)ircclnr
Division of watcr Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Subject:
Dear Mr. Mullis :
July 15, 2004
7003 2260 0001 3550 2134
Notice of Violation - Effluent Limitations
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
NOV-2004-LV-0327
Mecklenburg County
A review of the March 2004 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a
the following parameter:
Pipe
001
Parameter
Fecal Coliform
Reported Value Limit
1100/100 ml 400/100 ml FIN
ation of
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The
Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the
violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you
anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by
Consent. You may contact Richard Bridgeman of this Office for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bridgeman or
me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
N©h RIvIIiB
,Naturally Dirn 0
919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Ke: bouKsavann Ngaoluangratn INUV
Subject: Re: Souksavanh Ngaoluangrath NOV
From: Richard Bridgeman <Richard.Bridge
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:56:50 -0400
To: "Jeff S. Price" <[e-mail]>
We'11 let this old dog lie. I'll cook the books to indicate a resolution.
Jeff S. Price wrote:
Hi Richard,
I did not know that an NOV had never been received. I have been
patiently awaiting a copy of the response. In the meantime, the
violation has been resolved. The residents dropped the lawsuit and paid
up the back -charges. The service provider re-established sewer service
to the residence by the time the NOV was mailed. I hand delivered a
copy to their front door, but as per usual, no response from the
residents. Since the violation has been resolved, we may want to
consider dropping this one. Please advise.
8928 Myra Way - White Forest Subdivision
Jeff Price
Environmental Hygienist
Mecklenburg County Government
Land Use and Environmental Services Agency
Water Quality Program
[phone]
"Richard Bridgeman" <[e-mail]> 8/23/2004
2:12:06 PM >»
Jeff, this NOV left this office on 6/18/04 and came back marked "Unclaimed"
today, over 2 months later. Based on the investigative report, Mr. N's
violation was rather blatant. Do you need to hand deliver the NOV? Has the
violation been resolved? I failed to get the
NOV into my personal tracking system, so was not aware that a response
had not been received.
1 of 1 8/26/2004 1:12 PM

CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided)
Ced
• Return Redept
• (Endorsement Requl
3 Restricted Delivery
O (Endorsement Required
U
U
3
MR SOUKSAVANH NGAOLUANGRATI1,
OWNER
8928 MYRA WAY
Of CHARLOTTE NC 28215
wq/nnb 6/18/04

:edified Mail Provides;
■ A mailing receipt (esJeaeriJ ZOoz eunf 'owe twoJ g,
■ A unique Identifier for your maitpiece
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
Mportant Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mans or Priority Mail
■ Certified Mail Is not available for any class of International mail.
■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDE© with Certified Mail. Ft
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mao.
■ For an additional fee a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof a
delivery. To obtain Reium Receipt service please complete and attach a Retun
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover ttr
fee. Endorse malipiece Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver fo
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS0 postmark on your Certified Mall receipt i
required.
■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee c
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mallplece with th
endorsement 'Restricted Delivery.
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt Is desired, please present the aril
ale at the post office for postmarking, If a postmark on the Certified Ma
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mall.
MPORTANT: Save this receipt and present It when making an Inquiry.
Internet access to delivery information is not available on mail
addressed to APOs and FPOs.

ichaei F. Easley, Go
William G. Ross Jr, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Colecn H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 18, 2004
CER'1`iy iE
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Souksavanh Ngaoluangrath, Property Owne©03 2260 0001 3550 1854
8928 Myra Way
Charlotte, NC 28215
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Incident #: 200401210
Tracking #: NOV-2004-DV-0024
Violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)
Discharge of Sewage
8928 Myra Way, Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Ngaoluangrath
Chapter 143, Article 21 of the North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) authorizes and directs
the Environrnental Management Commission of this Department to protect and preserve the water
resources of the State. The Division of Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted
pollution control rules and regulations.
On June 4, 2004, Mr. Jeff Price of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an investigation of your property located at 8928 Myra Way. This investigation
was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. As a result of this investigation, the following condition was found on the
property in violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a):
Discharge of sewage to the ground.
Be advised that G.S. 143-215.6A provides for a civil penalty assessment of not more than
twenty-fiverthousan`d dollars ($25,000.00), or twee ty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per day when
the violation is of a continuing nature, against any person who is required but fails to apply for or to
secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1. Penalties may also be assessed for any damage to the
surface waters of the State that may result from the unpermitted discharge. You will be advised of
anv enforcement recommendation.
N�o�ttCaroh
,Vatura4
919 North Main SbCet. Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. Souksavanh Ngaoluangrath, Property Owner
Page 2
June 18, 2004
To comply with the law, it will be necessary to immediately discontinue all illegal discharge
activity. It is also recommended that you implement corrective actions to eliminate the potential for
recurrent illegal discharges.
It is requested that you respond, in writing, to this Notice, indicating the actions you have taken
to correct the violation. Please address your response to me by no later than July 9,2004. Also,
please send a copy of this response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle of MCWQP at 700 North Tryon Street,
Suite 205, Charlotte, NC, 28202.
Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at
704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Superviso
DRG/jsp
File Name: Naa©luangatK0608O4.nov

EPIC - WQ
06/11/2004
SERVICE REQUEST/WORK ORDER
PAGE NO:
LOG NUMBER: 2004-00526
SECTION: WQY
ENVIRONMENTALIST: Jeff S. Price
NATURE OF REQUEST: Administrative Request/Work Order
FILE DESCRIPTOR 1: IC-F(1)-CI
FILE DESCRIPTOR 2: WHITE FOREST WWTP
CONTACT:
COMPANY/WORKPLACE:
ADDRESS:
GENE MULLIS
DATE: 06/07/2004 @ 14:37
TAKEN BY: Jeff S. Price
REQUESTING PARTY INFO
BUSINESS PHONE NO: [phone] HOME PHONE NO: ( ) -
NOTIFICATION PROMPT: Phone Book
FACILITY INFO
COMPANY: SOUKSAVANH NGAOLUANGRATH
ADDRESS: 8928 MYRA WY
CHARLOTTE NC 28215- -
CONTACT: Souksavanh Ngaoluangrath
PHONE NO: [phone]
ACTIVITIES
10808310
SERVICE REQUESTED..:
Gene Mullis reports sewer service disconnected at 8928 Myra Way. Please investigate,
ACTION TAKEN.......:
6/2/2004
Rusty Rozzell (MCWQP) received notification from Mr. Gene Mullis that sewer service to 8928 Myra Way had been
disconnected due to non-payment.
6/4/2004
JPrice responded to 8928 Myra Way. I spoke to Mr. Mullis. He disconnected sewer service by cutting the lateral at the street
and capping the open ended pipes. The disconnection was conducted mid -day and the residents were not contacted directly.
Mr. Mullis left a message on their door indicating the status of the service. Mr. Mullis also stated that he had never contacted
the residents directly, but that they had ignored payment due notices for over 1 year, and that they had an outstanding
balance in excess of $2000. Mr Mullis stated that he disconnected the service based on advice that he received from Jack
Floyd (NC Public Utilities Division).
The excavation area where the service had been disconnected was evident. Also evident were three 5-gallon buckets,
inverted on the lawn. Under each bucket was a pvc cleanout, presumably from the sewer lateral. One of the three cleanouts
had been broken out at the cap and sewer smelling water was observed in the immediate area.
I contacted Kelly Randall (MC Environmental Health) and Kathy Davis (City of Charlotte Building Code Enforecement. Kathy
will assign a building inspector to investigate housing code violations. Kelly indicated the possiblity of contacting DSS relating
to child care issues and health/sewage in the residence.
I left an environmental notice on the front door of the residence. I also discovered that the residence has a listed phone
number, under the name N Chawpom [phone]. The answering machine (English) idetified the residence as the
Chawporn's. I left a message to return my call,
6/7/2004
Souk Ngaoluangrath returned my call. He stated that he had financial troubles and was unable to pay the bill for sewage
treatment and that he was aware of the situation. I told him that a sewage discharge would not be allowed and that he would
have to resolve the situation immediately. I recommended that he contact Mr. Mullis ASAP regarding restoration of sewer

EPIC - WQ
06/11/2004
SERVICE REQUEST/WORK ORDER
PAGE NO: 2
service. I also informed him that I would issue a State NOV.
I called Dennis Gwaltney to inquire about estimated time of completion for CMU sewer service to the subdivision.
6/8/2004
Dennis Gwaltney returned my call and indicated that sewer service to the area was still approx. 1 year away.
I also received a call from Mr. Doug Simmons (Atty. representing Mr. Ngaoluangrath). He wanted background info and phone
numbers to reach Mr. Mullis and Mr. Floyd.
John McCulloch and I called Mr. Floyd. Mr. Floyd no longer works in that division and our call was forwarded to Mr. Andy Lee.
We left a message on voicemail.
JPrice drafted a State NOV.
6/10/2004
I received a call from Charles Hitsman (City Clt Code Enforcement). Charles is the inspector assigned to investigate potential
code violations at 8928 Myra Way. Charles stated that he had inspected the property and determined that the residence
violated City Code 11-80B - Plumbing not connected to an approved wastewater disposal system. He will issue the violation
and has set a hearing date for July 12th. Based on the outcome, a lien could be placed on the property.
6/11/2004
JPrice and JMcCulloch received a call from Andy Lee (NC Public Utilities Commission). Andy identified Mr. Mullis as a Public
Utility and stated his opinion that Mr. Mullis had acted in a fair manner. Due dilligence with notifications of service termination
were sufficient to warrant sen►V'ce disconnects.
NOV final draft submitted to NCDENR MRO.
COMMENTS............
SAMPLES
DISPOSITION, ETC.
NOTIFIED REQ PARTY: TIME ON SITE:
VERBAL OR WRITTEN: TRAVEL TIME:
DATE NOTIFIED: / / ADMIN TIME:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION: N MILEAGE: 0
LEGAL ACTION: N SITE VISITS: 0
WELL SAMPLE: N RECALL DATE: / /
OUTFALL SAMPLE: N STATUS: OPEN
LAKE/STREAM SAMPLE: N DATE CLOSED: / /
EMERGENCY RESPONSE: N
REVIEWED BY: / /

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE, NC 28I 1.5
IMP
7003 226E 0001 3550 1854
MR SOUKSAVANH NGAOLUAN
8928 MYRA WAY
CHARLOTTE NC 28215
TH, OWNER

' 1■ r - fit: 'r
1HOIw 3 U Ol 3d013AN3 dO 401 11.V 113)IaUB 30Y1d
COMPLETE THIS SECTION N DELIVERY
SUKSAVANH NGAOLUANGRATH,
OWNER
8928 MYRA WAY
a CIIARLOTTE NC 28215
wq/rnib 6/18/04
700 2260 000 550 85

MEr ichael F. ey, Governor
Will iarn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT' REOUESTED
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Dear Mr. Mullis :
January 13, 2004
7003 2260 0001 3491 1296
Subject: Notice of Violation - Effluent Limitations
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
NOV-2004-LV-0021
Mecklenburg County
A review of the October 2003 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of
the following parameter:
Pipe Parameter Reported Value Limit
001 Total Suspended Residue 58.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L FIN
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The
Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the
violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you
anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by
Consent. You may contact Richard Bridgeman of this Office for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bridgeman or
me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
4'9
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
RMB
NhCamlina NCDE
'fataraiijt Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mccresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

dea
Michael F. Easl
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H, Sullins Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 23, 2004
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Mullis:
On March 4, 2004, Mr. Jeff Price of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP)
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative
working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report
should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) because of inspection findings, as
detailed under the Records and Reports and Self -Monitoring Program section headings. Should the
missing data for May and August 2003 actually be available, it is requested that amended DMR's be
submitted to Central Files in the usual manner. As you are probably aware, the reported BOD5 value (>6.15
mg/L) for April 1, 2003 is not acceptable, since the value does not allow a definitive determination of
compliance. Be aware that any records that will be reviewed during an inspection should either be
maintained on site or brought to the site for review.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not hes
Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at this office.
Enclosure
Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Glenn LaBrecque, AquaSource, Inc
DRG/jsp
FILE: White Forest.0063932.0304.doc
No hCamlina
Naturally Divisi
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
o call
NC.DE t
oI Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Transaction
N
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Code
5
Section A: National Data System Coding
Tocr
NCDENR
NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector
NC0063932 04/03/04
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI
0.5 2
tion B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd.
Mecklenburg County, NC
Name(s) of On -Site Representative / Title(s) / Phone No(s):
Kevin Curl / Field Coordinator / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Entry Time:
10:40 am
Exit Time:
11:10 am
Date:
March 4, 2004
QA
N
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
Approval Expires
7.'31/85
Facility Type
2
.Reserved............
Permit Effective Date:
January 1, 2001
Permit Expiration Date:
November 30, 2003
Name and Address of Responsible 0 cia
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Title:
Owner
Phone No.
[phone]
Contacted?
No
Permit
Records/Reports
[ZI Facility Site Review
1E1 Effluent/Receiving Waters
gC:40._k
s va listed During Iuspection
Flow Measurement
Self -Monitoring Program
El Compliance Schedules
Laboratory
Z Operations & Maintenance
Sludge H dling/Disposal
0 Pretreatment Program
LJ Stormwater
Section uttimary of Findmgs/Com
ents
El Sewer Overflow
Ej Pollution Prevention
Multimedia
E] Other.
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Jeff Price
Agency/Office/Telephone:
MCWQP / [phone]
Date:
March 17, 2004
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete
Date:

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected by MCWQP on June 3, 2003. A Compliance Evaluation
Inspection Report was issued on July 9, 2003.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on January 1, 2001, and expired on November 30,
2003. A permit renewal application has been submitted to NC DENR and is currently under
review. The facility will continue to operate under the previous permit requirements until
notification of a status change.
The existing 0.017 MGD facility is an extended aeration package wastewater treatment
plant with a bar screen, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, sludge holding tank, effluent tablet
chlorination, and chlorine contact tank. As a result of the permit modification dated August 15,
2001, the individual residential septic tanks are no longer listed as part of the wastewater
treatment facility description.
Mr. Kevin Curl was the Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) throughout the period of
review. Mr. Curl maintained a North Carolina Operators Certification Grade IV, which was
acceptable for the class of the facility. Mr. Curl's Certification Number is 9457.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period April 2003 through
December 2003. Visitation and process control records are kept on -site in a logbook. Instrument
calibration logs were available on request. No detailed maintenance records are maintained on
site. All records appeared to be completed accurately with the following exception:
1. The DMR for April 2003 reported a Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) result
which does not provide for a determination of compliance with the discharge limit
(e.g. permitted BOD5 daily maximum limit = 45 mg/1; DMR reports >6.15 mg/1).
FACILITY SI1E REVIEW:
All of the existing components of the facility were reportedly operational at the time of the
inspection; however, operation of only one of the facility's two blowers was observed. The
clarifier appeared somewhat murky and considerable solids were noted. This problem was also
observed during the previous inspection. In the previous inspection, the ORC reportedly changed
the operational set times on the blower cycles in order to address the situation. This did not
appear to completely resolve the problem. Solids from the clarifier carried over to the
chlorination chamber but were not apparent in the effluent discharge observed during the
inspection.
RATING: Marginal

FLOW MEASUREMENT:
The ORC estimates the flow based on effluent head at the v-notch weir. A permanently
attached staff gauge has been installed at the v-notch in order to ensure accurate, repeatable
readings.
LABORATORY:
AquaSource operates and maintains a NC State Certified Laboratory for the analysis of
wastewater (NC Certification No. 365). AquaSource is also State Certified for the collection of
field parameters. All compliance samples collected for analysis at the White Forest facility are
submitted to the AquaSource Lab. The AquaSource lab was not evaluated during this inspection.
E}'F LUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to Reedy Creek, which is a Class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. Effluent discharged during the inspection was clear and low in color. There did not
?ppear to be any negative impact on the receiving stream at the time of the inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period April 2003 through
December 2003. The reports indicate that the facility was in compliance with monitoring
frequencies and permit effluent limits at the times of monitoring during the review period, except
for the following:
1. One (1) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) value was reported on April 1, 2003 at
a level (>6.15 mg/1) which does not allow a determination of compliance. This
constitutes one (1) violation.
2. One (1) failure to monitor / failure to report Dissolved Oxygen was noted on May 28,
2003. This constitutes one (1) violation.
3. One (1) failure to monitor / failure to report Total Residual Chlorine was noted on
August 1, 2003. This constitutes one (1) violation.
4. One (1) Total Suspended Residue value in excess of the daily maximum permit
effluent limit was reported on. October 22, 2003. This constitutes one (1) violation,
for which a NOV was issued (NOV-2004-LV-0021).
The DMRs dated April, May and August 2003 incorrectly identified the noncompliant
facility status. This constitutes three (3) violations. No additional violations were noted during
the period of review.
RATING: Marginal

OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and grounds appeared to be properly operated and maintained. The current
operating strategy for the facility appears acceptable for its size and type.
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL:
The ORC reports that no solids have been wasted from the facility during the period of
review. If necessary, Piedmont Septic Service of Rowan County would be the contractor used for
this procedure.
SEWER OVERFLOW:
Please be advised that pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPDES permit and North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 2B .0506 (a)(2), any failure of a collection system, pumping
station or treatment facility resulting in a bypass without treatment of all or any portion
of the wastewater shall be reported to the appropriate regional office (Mooresville Regional
Office 704/663-1699) as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours from the time the permittee-
becomes aware of the bypass. For spills/bypasses that occur in Mecklenburg County, it is
requested that MCWQP be notified at 704/336-5500. Spills occurring on weekends or holidays
can be reported by calling the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management at 800/662-
7956, 800/858-0368, or 919/733-3300. A written report shall also be provided within five (5)
days of the time of the incident. The report shall contain a description of the bypass, and its
cause; the period of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been
corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken (or planned) to reduce,
eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the similar events. Any spill that reaches surface waters (i.e.
any spill that reaches any water already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc.) or any spill
greater than 1,000 gallons on the ground that does not reach surface waters must be reported.
An adequate spill response for those spills reaching surface waters should include an
evaluation downstream of the point at which the spill entered surface waters to determine if a fish
kill occurred. The evaluation should also include the collection of upstream dissolved oxygen and
pH measurements for background information and dissolved oxygen and pH measurements at
multiple points downstream of the entry point to document any negative impact. Failure to report
the bypass of collection system, pumping station or treatment facility subjects violators to
penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day per violation.

AquaSource
A DQE Company
July 16, 2003
Gene Mullis, Owner
116 —J Freeland Lane
Charlotte, NC 28217
107 Commercial Park Drive 704-788-9497
Concord, NC 28027 704-788-6006 (fax)
Subject: White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No, NC0063932
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr, Mullis:
JUL I 7" 20.13
This letter and attached letter from the Division of Water Quality is intended to convey that it was and is
your responsibility to submit the renewal application by the June I. 2003 deadline date. It is of the utmost
importance that you take care of this matter as soon as possible. If there are any questions that you may
have please call our office at [phone] and we will be more than happy to assist y01.1.
As always we appreciate your business
NC Area Manager
AquaSource Operations. Inc,
Cc: D, Rex Gleason_
Glen LaBreque, AquaSource, Inc.

.Jul 14 03 05:21p Carolyn McFalls
941 907 0965
P • 2
Transaction
N
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Code
5
Data System Coding
NCDENR
NPDES Permit No, YRIMO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector
NC0063932 03/06/03 C C
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
Approval Expires
7/31/85
Facility Type
2
Remar
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
spection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
0.5 2 N N
ood Rd.
nburg County, NC
Name
Perry L S
Kevin Cur
petted:
On -Site Representative / Tine No(s):
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Field Coordinator / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Entry Tim
09:00 am
Exit Time:
0:15 am
Date:
3. 200
Nave
.Reserved............
0, 2
Date:
Name and Address of Respo
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlt�tt, NC 28212
sible Official:
Title:
Owner
hone No.
44) 904-0178
Contacted?
Yes
ee
Permit
Records/Reports
Facility Site Review
Efflu ntlReceiving Waters
alua
® Flow Measurement
® Self -Monitoring Program
0 Compliance Schedules
Laboratory
g
sp
j gyrations & Maintenance
Sludge Handling/Disposal
© Pretreatment Program
[] Stormwater
Sewer Overflow
© Pollution Prevention
0 Multimedia
© Other.
Section D: Sumitar
Findings/Comim nt
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signa
e(s) of Insp
Jeff Price
c
Agency/Office/Telephone:
MCWQP / [phone]
Da
June 17, 2003
ignature of Reviewer:
Agency/O
Date:
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

Jul 14 03 05:21p Carolyn McFalls
941 907 0965 p• 3
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected by MCWQP on April 26, 2002. A Compliance Evaluation
Inspection ReporUNotice of Violation was issued on May 30, 2002.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on January 1, 2001, and expires on November 30,
2003. A permit renewal application should have been submitted by no later than June 1, 2003.
The existing 0.017 MGD facility is an extended aeration package wastewater treatment
plant with a bar screen, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, sludge holding tank, effluent tablet
chlorination, and chlorine contact tank. As a result of the permit modification dated August 15,
2001, the individual residential septic tanks are no longer Listed as part of the wastewater
treatment facility description.
Mr. Perry Smith is the Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC). Mr. Smith maintains a
North Carolina Operators Certification Grade II, which is acceptable for the class of the facility.
Mr. Smith's certification number is NC 9445.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period March 2002
through March 2003. Visitation, maintenance, and process control records are kept on -site in a
logbook. Instrument calibration logs were available on request. All records were legible and well
maintained.
FACILITY SITE REVTEW:
All of the existing components of the facility were in service and appeared to be operating
properly at the time of the inspection. However, the clarifier appeared somewhat murky and
some suspended pin floc was noted. The ORC reported recently changing the set times on the
blower cycles in order to address the situation. Floc from the clarifier did not appear to carry
over to the chlorination chamber or into the effluent.
RATING: Marginal
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
The ORC estimates the flow based on effluent head at the v-notch weir. A permanently
attached staff gauge has been installed at the v-notch in order to ensure accurate, repeatable
readings.

Jul 14 03 05:21p Carolyn McFalls
941 907 0965 p.4
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by the AquaSource laboratory, which is certified
by the State of North Carolina to perform wastewater analysis. The AquaSource Lab was not
evaluated during this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to Reedy Creek, which is a Class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. Effluent discharged during the inspection was clear and low in color. There did not
appear to be any negative impact on the receiving stream at the time of the inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period March 2002
through March 2003. The reports indicate that the facility was in compliance with monitoring
frequencies and permit effluent limits at the times of monitoring during the review period, except
for the following:
One (1) Fecal coliform result in excess of the daily maximum permit e!fluent limit was
noted on October 29, 2002. This constitutes one (1) violation, for which an
enforcement action was taken (LV 03-167).
2. One (1) Ammonia -Nitrogen (NH3-N) sample was footnoted on the DMR, indicating
that the sample contained residual chlorine. The sample was collected on July 30,
2002. The lab neutralized residual chlorine, however precautions should be taken to
ensure preservation in the field.
The DMR dated October 2002 correctly identified the noncompliant facility status. No
additional violations were noted during the period of review.
RATING: Marginal
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and grounds appeared to be properly operated and maintained. The current
operating strategy for the facility appears acceptable for its size and type.
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL:
The ORC was unaware of solids ever wasted from the facili
If necessary, Piedmont
Septic Service of Rowan County would be the contractor used for this procedure.

Jul 14 03 05:21p Carolyn McFalls
941 907 0965 p• 5
SEWER OVERFLOW:
Please be advised that pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPDES permit, and North
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 2B .0506 (a)(2), any failure of a collection system,
pumping station or treatment facility resulting in a bypass without treatment of all or any portion
of the wastewater shall be reported to the appropriate regional office (Mooresville Regional
Office 704-663-1699) as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours from the time the permitter
became aware of the bypass. Spills occurring on weekends or holidays can be reported by calling
the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management at 919-733-3300, 800-662-7956, or 800-
858-0368. A written report shall also be provided within five (5) days of the time of the incident.
The report shall contain a description of the bypass, and its cause; the period of the bypass,
including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken (or planned) to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of
the similar events. Any spill that reaches surface waters (i.e. any spill that reaches any water
already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc.) or any spill greater than 1,000 gallons on the
ground that does not reach surface waters must be reported.
An adequate spill response for those spills reaching surface waters should include an
evaluation downstream of the point at which the spill entered surface waters to determine if a fish
kill occurred. The evaluation should also include the collection of upstream dissolved oxygen and
pH measurements for background information and dissolved oxygen and pH measurements at
multiple points downstream of the entry point to document any negative impact. Failure to report
the bypass of collection system, pumping station or treatment facility subjects violators to
penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day per violation.

William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina DepanmeTn ofEnvironrn:nt and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 9, 2003
Mr. H. E. Mu lis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Mullis:
On June 3, 2003, Mr. Jeff Price of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part
of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water
Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at this office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Glen LaBreque, AquaSource Utilities, Inc.
DRG/jsp
FILE: White Forest.0063932.0503.doc
4v7
,DE
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

Transaction
N
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Code
5
Section A: National Data System Coding
NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector
NC0063932 03/06/03
C C
Form. Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
Approval Expires
7/31/85
Facility Type
2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating
0.5
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd.
Mecklenburg County, NC
2
BI
N
See ion B: F cility_Dat
Entry Time:
09:00 am
Exit Time:
10:15 am
Date:
June 3, 2003
QA
N
Name(s) of On -Site Representative / Title(s) / Phone No(s):
Perry L. Smith / Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Kevin Curl / Field Coordinator / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
Permit
Records/Reports
® Facility Site Review
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Title:
Owner
..Reserved.........—.
Permit Effective Date:
January 1, 2001
Permit Expiration Date:
November 30, 2003
Phone No.
[phone]
piec1
Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance
Self -Monitoring Program ® Sludge Handling/Disposal
0 Compliance Schedules © Pretreatment Program
Stormwater
Laboratory
ection 1) Su
of Findings/Comments`
Contacted?
Yes
Sewer Overflow
Q Pollution Prevention
0 Multimedia
© Other:
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspecto
Jeff Price
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office/Telephone:
MCWQP / [phone]
Agency/Office
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete
Date:
June 17, 2003
Date:

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected by MCWQP on April 26, 2002. A Compliance Evaluation
Inspection Report/Notice of Violation was issued on May 30, 2002.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on January 1, 2001, and expires on November 30,
2003. A permit renewal application should have been submitted by no later than June 1, 2003.
The existing 0.017 MGD facility is an extended aeration package wastewater treatment
plant with a bar screen, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, sludge holding tank, effluent tablet
chlorination, and chlorine contact tank. As a result of the permit modification dated August 15,
2001, the individual residential septic tanks are no longer listed as part of the wastewater
treatment facility description.
Mr. Perry Smith is the Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC). Mr. Smith maintains a
North Carolina Operators Certification Grade II, which is acceptable for the class of the facility.
Mr. Smith's certification number is NC 9445.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period March 2002
through March 2003. Visitation, maintenance, and process control records are kept on -site in a
logbook. Instrument calibration logs were available on request. All records were legible and well
maintained.
FACILITY SI'l E REVIEW:
All of the existing components of the facility were in service and appeared to be operating
properly at the time of the inspection. However, the clarifier appeared somewhat murky and
some suspended pin floc was noted. The ORC reported recently changing the set times on the
blower cycles in order to address the situation. Floc from the clarifier did not appear to carry
over to the chlorination chamber or into the effluent.
RATING: Marginal
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
The ORC estimates the flow based on effluent head at the v-notch weir. A permanently
attached staff gauge has been installed at the v-notch in order to ensure accurate, repeatable
readings.

LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by the AquaSource laboratory, which is certified
by the State of North Carolina to perform wastewater analysis. The AquaSource Lab was not
evaluated during this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to Reedy Creek, which is a Class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. Effluent discharged during the inspection was clear and low in color. There did not
appear to be any negative impact on the receiving stream at the time of the inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period March 2002
through March 2003. The reports indicate that the facility was in compliance with monitoring
frequencies and permit effluent limits at the times of monitoring during the review period, except
for the following:
1. One (1) Fecal coliform result in excess of the daily maximum permit effluent limit was
noted on October 29, 2002. This constitutes one (1) violation, for which an
enforcement action was taken (LV 03-167).
2. One (1) Ammonia -Nitrogen (NH3-N) sample was footnoted on the DMR, indicating
that the sample contained residual chlorine. The sample was collected on July 30,
2002. The lab neutralized residual chlorine, however precautions should be taken to
ensure preservation in the field.
The DMR dated October 2002 correctly identified the noncompliant facility status. No
additional violations were noted during the period of review.
RATING: Marginal
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and grounds appeared to be properly operated and maintained. The current
operating strategy for the facility appears acceptable for its size and type.
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL:
The ORC was unaware of solids ever wasted from the facility. If necessary, Piedmont
Septic Service of Rowan County would be the contractor used for this procedure.

SEWER OVERFLOW:
Please be advised that pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPDES permit, and North
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 2B .0506 (a)(2), any failure of a collection system,
pumping station or treatment facility resulting in a bypass without treatment of all or any portion
of the wastewater shall be reported to the appropriate regional office (Mooresville Regional
Office 704-663-1699) as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours from the time the permittee
became aware of the bypass. Spills occurring on weekends or holidays can be reported by calling
the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management at 919-733-3300, 800-662-7956, or 800-
858-0368. A written report shall also be provided within five (5) days of the time of the incident.
The report shall contain a description of the bypass, and its cause; the period of the bypass,
including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken (or planned) to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of
the similar events. Any spill that reaches surface waters (i.e. any spill that reaches any water
already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc.) or any spill greater than 1,000 gallons on the
ground that does not reach surface waters must be reported.
An adequate spill response for those spills reaching surface waters should include an
evaluation downstream of the point at which the spill entered surface waters to determine if a fish
kill occurred. The evaluation should also include the collection of upstream dissolved oxygen and
pH measurements for background information and dissolved oxygen and pH measurements at
multiple points downstream of the entry point to document any negative impact. Failure to report
the bypass of collection system, pumping station or treatment facility subjects violators to
penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day per violation.

Gene Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
1161 Freeland Lane
Charlotte, NC
Dear Permittee:
©n
NCDENR
28217
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
i: EP pp
Alan W.yf.t«' a,r
MEW
CES
Al OFFICE
May 14, 2003
Subject: Renewal Notice
NPDES Permit NC006
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
MAY 2 2 2003
Your NPDES permit expires on November 30, 2003. Federal (40 CFR 122.41) and North Carolina (15.A NCAC
2H.0105(e)) regulations require that permit renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current
permit. If you have already mailed your renewal application, you may disregard this notice.
To satisfy this requirement, your renewal package must be sent to the Division postmarked no later than June 3, 2003.
Failure to request renewal of the permit by this date may result in a civil assessment of at least $500.00. Larger penalties may be
assessed depending upon the delinquency of the request.
If any wastewater discharge will occur after November 30, 2003, the current permit must be renewed. .Discharge of
wastewater without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General, Statute 143-215.1; unpermitted discharges of wastewater
may result in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact Bob Sledge of the
Division's Compliance Enforcement Unit at [phone], extension 547. You may also contact the Mooresville Regional
Office at [phone] to begin the rescission process.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must submit with
the permit renewal application. if you have any questions, please contact Valery Stephens at the telephone number or e-mail
address listed below.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver
NPDES Unit
cc Central Files
NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733.5083, extension 520 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT us©NTHE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES e-mail: [e-mail]

NPDES Permit NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
LI A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
E The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
LI If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to any
such Authorized Representative (see Part II.B.11.b of the existing NPDES permit).
A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies.
The following items must be submitted by any Municipal or Industrial facilities discharging
process wastewater:
Industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 122) and ALL Municipal facilities with a permitted flow ?_ 1.0 MGD must submit a
Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21.
The above requirement does NOT apply to privately owned facilities treating 100%
domestic wastewater, or facilities which discharge non -process wastewater (cooling
water, filter backwash, etc.)
PLEASE NOTE:
Due to a change in fees effectiveJanuary 1, 1999, there is no renewal fee required with your
application package.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NC DENR / Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Mr. Richard Bridge an
NCDENR
Mooresvile Regional Office
919 North Main St.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No, NC0063932
Compliance Evaluation Inspection May 1, 2001
Mr. Bridgeman:
NC DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT \
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE R,,c34:;NAL oFncr
JUL 1 9 2001
ATER QUALITY SECTION
I request that the subject NPDES Permit be modified to remove
reference to the septic tanks.
Also, by the reason of the nonexistance of right of ways nor
state maintained roadways; maintainance of piping on individual
residential properties may be impossible. I request for the
reference to the 4-inch gravity sewer to also be removed.
Sincerely,
H E Mullis
fi116 Honeysuckle Ln.
Charlotte, NC 28212

Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AUG 2 6 2002
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWTP
116 - J Freeland Ln.
Charlotte, NC 28217
Subject: Remission. Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
NPDES Permit Number NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Case Number LV 02-145
Dear Mr. Mullis:
I considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in.
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have decided to remit the entire civil penalty in the
amount of $585.45 and hereby close our case number LV 02-145.
Please be advised that a full reduction of the civil penalty assessment in no way precludes
the Division from taking future enforcement action against the subject facility should additional
violations occur.
If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Sledge at
[phone], extension 547.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
M vine Region 0
Enforcement File
Central Files
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone] Fax: [phone]

July 30, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rex Gleason
FROM: Richard Bridge an
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Case No. LV 02-145
White Forest WWT Trust
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County
To justify remission, Mr. Mullis indicated that construction activities during the summer
of 2000 by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) allegedly resulted in a break in the force
main serving the White Forest system, allowing the inflow of soil into the collection system, and
subsequently into the WWTP. This breech was only discovered and repaired by Mr. Mullis
recently. Apparently, Mr. Dennis Gwaltney, a CMU engineer, has accepted responsibility for
the breech. A response by AquaSource to the CEI conducted on 4/26/02 by MCWQP staff
indicates that inflow from heavy rains entered the breech in the force main, hydraulically
overloading the WWTP, causing turbulence in the sludge blanket, reducing settling time, and
causing a discharge of solid laden water.
Mr. Mullis' remission request also deals with other, broader, issues concerning his desire
to eventually eliminate the WWTP discharge through a connection to either the WWTP serving
the adjacent McCarron Subdivision or to the CMU collection system. Concerning the connection
of the White Forest Development to the adjacent McCarron Subdivision's WWTP (NPDES
Permit No. NC0071781, issued to AquaSource Inc.), any connection is only a future potential.
There are problems (I/I) with the collection system for the White Forest WWTP which would
have to be addressed before AquaSource would allow the connection. Any connection to the
CMU system could probably not occur for years (?); a report (dated 4/10/02) drafted by Jack
Floyd of the Utilities Commission, and included in the remission request, i�lttrt�re
0
Since the enforcement action there have been no reported effluent limit violations (latest
DMR is 4/02).
Mr. Mullis' remission request is disjointed and confrontational; however, although the
evidence is circumstantial at best, it is the writer's opinion that the permittee did provide the
minimum justification for a remission.
H:1W PWINDOCIMEMOIW HITEFO2.RR

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT
VIOLATOR: tifift/ LA) iA,r7-1
COUNTY: firCi< 1Al(A-Ide °-
CASE NUMBER: L V 0 2 /13-
ASSESSMENT FACTORS:
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting fm the violation(s);
1117(Not Significant 0 Moderately Significant 0 Significant 0 Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
2) The Duration and gravity of the violation(s);
Not Significant 0 Moderately Significant 0 Significant 0 Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
3) The effect oy ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
ErNot Significant 0 Moderately Significant D Significant 0 Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
4) The cost offectifying the damage;
poi Not Significant 0 Moderately Significant 0 Significant 0 Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
0 Not Significant tk/Moderately Significant 0 Significant D Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
6) Whether th, violation(s) was (were) committed willfully or intentionally;
/Not Significant 0 Moderately Significant D Significant 0 Very Significant D Extremely Significant
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which tbe
Envronm4tal Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
ti Not Significant 0 Moderately Significant 0 Significant 0 Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
8) The cost tothe State of the enforcement procedures.
di Not Significant D Moderately Significant 0 Significant 0 Very Significant 0 Extremely Significant
()
0
0
Date
e) k
D. Rex Gleason, P.
Water Quality Regiona Supervisor
REMISSION FACTORS:
Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the detriment of the
petitioner;
Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation(s);
Whether the violation(s) was (were) inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
and
Whether Raymynt of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessa di ctio
Date • Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director

ARO NA I URN . RE S RCE S
State of North Carolina mooRzsvq„.u.,,REGulto ornce,
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Wiliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Attn: Mr. H. E. Mullis
116 - J Freeland Ln
Charlotte, NC 28217
Dear Mr. Mullis :
JUN 2 0 2002
June 18, 2002
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Remission Request of
Civil Penalty Assessment
White Forest Wwtp
Mecklenburg County
Permit No: NC0063932
LV 02-145
This letter is to acknowledge your request for remission of the civil penalty levied against the subject facility.
You will be notified when a decision is made concerning the request. If you have any questions, please call
Bob Sledge at [phone].
Cc:
Enforcement File LV 02-
Central Files
attachments
Sincerely,
Coleen Sullins, Chief
ater Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF _ Mecklenburg
IN THE MA I TER OF ASSESSMENT
CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
White Forest WWT Trust
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated
�/4 f . , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penaty , does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be
submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days
from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
AND STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 02-145
This the
day of
for
TELEPHONE

WHITE FOREST WWTP
116-J FREELAND LANE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28217
Coleen Sullins
ater Quality Section Chief
ision of Water Quality
617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27669-1617
Re: File No. LV02-145
Ms. Sullins:
I am asking for remission of the civil penalty assessed against White Forest.
The White Forest WWTP is a small package system serving 7 resident in the White Forest neighborhood.
It is being operated in an emergency temporary status,
The $ 150.00 interim rate is not adequate to provide basic operation, maintenance and upgrade costs.
AquaSource, Inc. is contracted to perform operator services.
I have previously requested for the TP to be abandoned and for the 7 residents to find alternatives for sewer
treatment, which is also part of the current permit language, but I have been denied: forcing me to continue
to operate the White Forest WWTP against my will.
I have previously requested the effluence from White Forest to be absorbed into the neighboring McCarron
WWTP system; which is also part of your past permitting language, however, I have not yet identified the
proper governing agency which can facilitate such.
In testimony before the NC Utilities Commission, Docket No. W-1157 (included), Mr. Jack Floyd, P.E.,
Utilities Engineer stated: "Technically speaking, the sewer treatment facility is in compliance with its
permit. This compliance status is the result of the facility not generating enough waste to cause a discharge
into Reedy Creek."
Off record and not verbatim, "occasionally a sewer plants burps. The smaller the plant, the more often it
will burp. TSS can be a by-product of such a burp; caused by a greater growth pattern. The TSS may have
been the bacteria itself."
The TSS was not analyzed for the types of solids present.
The system readily adjusted itself.
Non-compliance was not in any way willful nor intentional.
As noted in the Authorization to Construct letter, dated 12-3-87, each residence utilizes a septic tank to
retain and treat solids, as any septic tank will, which would seem to eliminate basic fecal solids from
entering into the TP.

Recently, I located and repaired a penetration into the 4-inch force main along Hood Rd. made by C-MUD
while boring under Hood Rd. to install a 'A inch water service piping to a residence during the summer of
2000.
C-MUD Engineer, Mr. Dennis Gwaltney, has accepted that the integrity of the force main was breeched
and soil has been able to enter the force main and thus the TP.
Therefore, I contend the elevated TSS to be just that: soil.
I don't have a visual for 19.3 Mg/L, but with million gallon spills of raw sewage for comparison, 19.3
Mg/L of soil or any other thing in a non-existent discharge into a dry ditch 40 feet from the edge of Reedy
Creek should not harm the natural resources of the state, the public health, nor the property of anyone. At
least, not to warrant the assessing of civil penalties for an inadvertent violation.
As previously stated, there are only 7 residents to pay all costs associated with properly permitting,
operating, maintaining and improving the White Forest WWTP plus allow for operator profit.
NC Utilities Conunission Accounting Division Supervisor, Water Section: Ms, Katherine A Fernald., has
allowed $640.00 to carry on the day-to-day operations for the year.
She has also allowed for an 8.5% return of $1127.61, based on monthly rates of $158.00. Actual interim
rates of $150.00 drop the projected return to $455.61.
Replacing the one operating pump of the duplex system in the lift station cost $1258.00 plus 9 man-hours
$60.00.
Repairing the 4-inch force man damaged by C-MUD cost $380.00.
Repairing the collection system piping leak cost $420.00 plus $120,00 for lime and re -seeding.
Replacing the 200 feet of collection system piping found to be inverted and clogged cost $4800,00.
The latest NCDWQ inspection 4-26-02 report of the White Forest WWTP calls for replacing a check valve
at an estimated cost of around $500.00; which is not available.
The latest NCDWQ inspection report of the lift station has been voiced by Mr. Will Autrey as atrocious; a
catastrophic event waiting to happen.
AquaSource, Inc. upgrade estimates to the lift station top $100,000.00.
Collection system upgrades approach $500,000.00.
It would seem obvious that civil penalties are not what these 7 White Forest citizens need.
What they do need is for the NCDWQ to recognize that the problem is much greater than the solution and
can be completely alleviated at a reasonable cost if the departments will join together with the needs,
requests and recommendations of the past 10 years and get us permitted to replace the whole collection
system with a low-pressure system connected into the McCarron WWTP system.
Please help us to rectify this situation instead of penalizing us.
Respectfully,
H. E. Mullis

RECEIVED
allOIMIS Of tiessorssuiftiTAL SUJIMEAdatt
DEC 15 I987
State of North Carolina
DepartZar4Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secrrmry December 3, 1987 Director
Mr. Herman F. Odom, President
United Systems Company
Route 10, Box 207
Lebanon, Tennessee 37087
t
Dear Mr. Odom:
SUBJECT: Permit No. NC0063932
Authorization to Construct
United Systems Company
White Forest Development
Mecklenburg County
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received May 22, 1987,
by the Division and final plans and specifications for the subject facilities have
been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the
construction of a 0.017MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of thirty-five
(35) 1,000 gallon septic tanks to serve individual residences, approximately 3,500
linear feet of 4-inch gravity sewer, an 80 GPM pump station with dual pumps and high
water alarms, approximately 1,950 linear feet of 3-inch force main, a 9000 gallon
aeration tank, a 3000 gallon clarifier, a 375 gallon chlorine contact tank with a
tablet chlorinator, 8 1,735 gallon sludge holding tank, and associated piping and
appurtenances to serve White Forest Development in Mecklenburg County.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III paragraph C
of the NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 issued January 22, 1986, and shall be subject to
revocation unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance
with the conditions and limitations specified in Permit No. NC0061932.
The Permittee must employ a certified wastewater operator in a,:cordance with Part
III paragraph D of the referenced permit.
The sludge wastes generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of
in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approvable by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management.
The Mooresville Regional Office, telephone no. 704-663-169g shall be notified at
least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of operation of the installed system so that
an in -place inspection can be made. Such notification to the Regional Supervisor
shall be made during the normal office hours.
Pollution Prevention Pays
PO. Box 27687, Raici,b-ils, North Carolina 27611.7687 Telephone [phone]
An Eclual Cfpipormetity Affirmative Action Employer

CONTRACT
BETWEEN RAYCO UNTILITES, INC. AND ARMON, INC.
TO OPERATE ONE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Rayco Utilities, In. agrees to provide an Operator in
Responsible Charge as defined by the State of North Carolina
Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators Certification
Commission and all tools and supervision necessary to
operate and maintain one 5,000 gpd Wastewater Treatment
Facility located at White Forest Subdivision in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina, ("the Facility") within the limits
and guidelines set forth in the NPDES Permit.
This includes instituting a preventive maintenance program
on all equipment, performing laboratory analysis; monitoring
and reporting and keeping all necessary records. Rayco will
Also provide 24-hour availability for servicing of the same,
7 days per week. Regularly scheduled visits will be five
(5) days per week. All emergency visits to repair equipment
will be charged at the rate of $40.00 per man hour. Visits
are considered emergency after 7:00 pm Monday thru Friday,
__Saturdays and Sundays).
Rayco will provide regular routine maintenance of plan€ and
equipment. Armon, Inc. will be responsible for cost of
repairs and replacement of equipment. Any such repairs
estimated to cost in excess of $200 shall first be verbally
approved by Armon, Inc. or its Agent. Armon, Inc. will
provide all in -plant chemicals (chlorine).

All work done or services performed by Rayco pursuant to the
terms of this contract shall be done in compliance with all
laws, orders, rules, regulations and .requirements of all
federal, state and municipal governments and the appropriate
departments, commissions, boards and offices thereof.
Rayco agrees to idemnify Armon, Inc. and hold save and hold
harmless from and against all suits, claims, and expenses,
including attorney's fees and court costs that may be
imposed upon, incurred by or assessed against Armon, Inc.
arising out of Rayco's failure to perform its obligations__
under this contract.
Rayco agrees to procure and maintain in force during the
terms of this contract, and any extension thereof, at its
expense, public and comprehensive liability insurance in
companies adequate to protect against liability for damage
claims arising out of Rayco's performance of its duties
under this contract, in a minimum amount of $500,000 for any
one accident and $300,000 for property damage.
Rayco agrees to operate the treatment facility for a rate of
$670.00 per month.
This contract will become effective 1/"" % 6
and continue for one year thereafter. Either party may
terminate this contract by furnishing 60-days writtEi
notification to the other party hereto.
ACCEPTED FOR:
ARMON, INC
BY:
RAYCO UTI
DATE: DATE:
TIS,INC.

NORTH CAROLINA
PUBLIC STAFF
UTILITIES COMMISSION
DOCKET NO. W-1157
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF
APPLICATION BY
HAROLD E. MULLIS, D/B/A WHITE FOREST
WASTEWATER TREATMENT, 116-J FREELAND LANE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28217
FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
AND NECESSITY TO PROVIDE SEWER UTILITY SERVICE
IN WHITE FOREST SUBDIVISION IN
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TESTIMONY OF
JACK FLOYD, P.E.
UTILITIES ENGINEER
APRIL 10, 2002
WATER DIVISION

PLEASE STATE FOR THE RECORD YOUR NAME, BUSINESS ADDRESS, AND
PRESENT POSITION.
My name is Jack Floyd. My business address is 430 North Salisbury Street, Dobbs
Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. I am a Utilities Engineer with the Public Staffs
Water Division.
Q. BRIEFLY STATE YOUR QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE RELATING TO
YOUR PRESENT POSITION WITH THE PUBLIC STAFF.
A. I am a graduate of North Carolina State University with a Bachelor of Science
Degree in Chemical Engineering. I am also licensed in North Carolina as a
Professional Engineer. I have more than 16 years of experience in water and
wastewater treatment facility design, construction, and permitting. I joined the
Public Staff on March 1, 1995.
Q. WHAT ARE YOUR DUTIES IN YOUR PRESENT POSITION?
A. My duties with the Public Staff are to evaluate the operation of regulated water and
sewer utilities regarding rates and service. In executing these duties, I conduct field
investigations and evaluate the design and construction of utility facilities. I also
assist in the preparation of reports and data to be used by the Commission; present
testimony regarding my investigation and findings; and make recommendations to
the Commission concerning the development of rates and level of service for
regulated water and sewer utilities.

BRIEFLY EXPLAIN THE SCOPE OF YOUR INVESTIGATION REGARDING THIS
APPLICATION FOR A SEWER UTILITY FRANCHISE.
I have made recommendations which have been utilized by Public Staff Accountant
Katherine Fernald regarding sewer operating revenues of Harold E. Mullis d/b/a
White Forest Wastewater Treatment (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant). I
have also evaluated the proposed operation of the sewer utility system.
Q. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE APPLICANT'S SERVICE AREA.
A. The Applicant's service area consists of only seven specific lots within the White
Forest Subdivision in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. White Forest
Subdivision was originally platted as a subdivision in 1956. It is Located near the
intersection of Robinson Church Road and Hood Road. Rayco Utilities operates a
sewer treatment facility adjacent to the White Forest Subdivision.
Q. PLEASE GIVE A BRIEF HISTORY LEADING UP TO THE FILING OF THE
APPLICATION FOR A SEWER UTILITY FRANCHISE.
A. The franchise to provide sewer service in White Forest Subdivision was granted to
United Systems Company, Inc. (USC) in 1986. USC did not own the system or the
underlying property. USC's franchise was cancelled in January 2000. Between
1989 and 1998 the property on which the wastewater treatment plant is located was
sold along with a number of undeveloped lots.
The Applicant acquired the property on which the wastewater treatment plant is
2

located in 1998. As part of this transaction, Mr. Mullis signed an agreement, which
was attached to the deed that basically calls for him to continue to provide
wastewater treatment services to those customers who were connected. Mr. Mullis
has continued to operate the wastewater system.
Sometime in late 2000, the Applicant sent the customers a letter requesting to be
paid for the wastewater services that the Applicant provided. The Public Staff
received a complaint from one of the customers and investigated the matter. Upon
investigation, the Applicant was encouraged to cease requesting payment from
customers until an application for a utility franchise was filed. On April 25, 2001, the
Applicant filed the subject franchise application.
I would also note that 2 homes have been constructed in the last 5 years and were
connected to the White Forest sewer system. And from conversations with the
Applicant and the customers, the Applicant has apparently collected payments for
service connections from two customers. Because the Commission did not approve
these payments, I am recommending that they be refunded to the customers, or
their accounts for sewer utility service credited. The Applicant should file a letter
with the Commission detailing the amounts received and the customers who paid
these fees.
Q. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE APPLICANT'S SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM.

A. The sewer collection and treatment system were constructed some time in the mid
to late 1980s. The treatment facility consists of a small 10,000 gallon per day
package type treatment plant with aeration tank, clarifier, and chlorine disinfection.
The plant is installed below ground and within 50 feet of Reedy Creek. The
collection system consists of gravity lines from the individual homes, a pumping
station, and force main. The integrity of the collection system is questionable.
No engineering plans exists that would describe the types of materials used to
construct the collection system or its location throughout White Forest Subdivision.
Neither DWQ nor Mecklenburg County have any records of approval for the sewer
system, streets, or other utilities.
Q. IS THE SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WITH DIVISION OF WATER
QUALITY (DWQ) REGULATIONS?
A. Technically speaking, the sewer treatment facility is in compliance with its NPDES
permit. This compliance status is the result of the facility not generating enough
wastewater to cause a discharge into Reedy Creek. As long as the facility does not
discharge effluent into the creek, the system is considered to be in compliance by
default. Monitoring reports have continually indicated "no discharge." Rayco
Utilities is the Applicant's contract operator for the treatment facility. However, they
have nothing to do with the collection system.
I should also note that the NPDES permit is due to expire at the end of Year 2003.
It is quite likely that DWQ will require a higher level of treatment if the facility is
4

operating beyond Year 2003.
PLEASE DESCRIBE THE PUBLIC STAFF'S EFFORTS TO INVESTIGATE
ALTERNATIVES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT.
The Public Staff has investigated several alternatives to running a private utility
company for seven residential sewer customers. Two of the more prominent
alternatives involved the possible connection to the Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
System (CMU), and the possible interconnection to McCarron Subdivision, which
is the adjacent subdivision operated by Rayco.
I have had several conversations with representatives of CMU and the Mecklenburg
County Health Department (MCHD). Based upon those conversations, it is my
understanding that CMU proposes to have municipal sewer service available along
Reedy Creek watershed in the next 5 to 10 years. CMU is presently performing
survey work and preliminary engineering work for the design of a major sewer
outfall along Reedy Creek. It is this outfall that could allow service to White Forest
Subdivision. However, CMU has not given me anything other than the estimated
time to complete construction of 5 to 10 years. There is some concern that roads
within White Forest Subdivision are not sufficient to allow CMU to extend municipal
service. CMU requires that roads be dedicated to NCDOT and be part of the
statewide road system before they extend service along them. Until CMU
completes construction of this outfall and agrees to extend sewer mains along Hood
5

Road and Hammond Road, and until these roads become part of the statewide road
system, municipal service will be unavailable.
The Public Staff also investigated the feasibility of interconnecting the White Forest
Subdivision with Rayco's McCarron Subdivision. After several months of
negotiations with Rayco representatives and the Applicant, no agreement could be
reached. The issues concerning this option have to do with title, easements,
access, integrity of the existing infrastructure, and who would bear the majority of
the costs associated with bringing the system up to current design standards.
However, at this point, this option is not available.
The Public Staff has also learned that the customers will likely not be capable of
installing their own individual septic system. The subdivision was originally
subdivided into half -acre lots, with individual wells for water. The size of the lots,
buffers to property lines and water supply wells, and the natural condition of the
soils in the area will likely prohibit the construction of onsite septic systems.
Therefore, it is my conclusion that in the short term, the only viable alternative for
sewer treatment for the seven customers in White Forest Subdivision is the
continuation of the system operated by the Applicant.
WHAT ARE THE RATES REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT?

A. The Applicant has requested a flat monthly rate of $213.50 per customer.
Q. HAS THE APPLICANT REQUESTED ANY CONNECTION FEES?
A. No it has not.
Q. WHAT ARE THE REVENUES UNDER THE APPLICANTS INTERIM RATES AND
PROPOSED RATES?
A. I have calculated revenues at the Applicant's proposed rates as follows:
7 customers x 12 mos. x $213.50/cust./mo $17,934
I have also calculated revenues under the interim rates approved by the
Commission on January 15, 2002 as follows:
7 customers x 12 mos. x $150.00/cust./mo $12,600
Q. DO YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE BOND
THE COMMISSION SHOULD REQUIRE OF THE APPLICANT?
A. Yes, I do. General Statute 62-110.3 requires the Commission to consider several
questions concerning the amount of bond. I have also considered these questions
in formulating my recommendation. My conclusions are given below:
1 The Applicant holds no other sewer utility franchises.
2. There are seven customers receiving sewer utility service in White Forest
Subdivision. There is no expectation of customer growth until an alternative
means of sewer service is available.
There is no likelihood that the White Forest facility will need to be expanded
7

in the next few years. However, there is a likelihood that an alternative
means of disposal will need to be acquired before the NPDES permit is
scheduled to expire.
4. The existing system serving White Forest is approximately 15 years old. The
integrity of the system cannot be assessed because engineering plans, or
regulatory records relating to the construction of the collection system and
treatment facility do not exist.
5 No other viable alternative presently exists for sewer utility service to the
seven existing customers. The only other option would be the appointment
of an emergency operator.
The Applicant posted a $10,000 bond with the Commission prior to the
Commission's Order granting Temporary Operating Authority, dated January 15,
2002. Based upon consideration of the above -mentioned conclusions, the Public
Staff does not recommend any additional bond.
Q. WHAT ARE YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE APPLICANT'S
PROPOSED RATES?
A. I have calculated rates based upon the revenue requirement calculated by Public
Staff Accountant Fernald. Ms. Fernald has determined a revenue requirement of
$13,266, for which I have calculated a flat monthly rate of $158.00.
I have contacted the Applicant concerning these recommended rates and revenue
8

requirement. The Applicant has indicated that these recommendations are
acceptable.
DO YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THIS
APPLICATION?
No, I do not.
DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOU TESTIMONY?
Yes, it does.

NORTH CAROLINA
PUBLIC STAFF
UTILITIES COMMISSION
DOCKET NO. W-1157, SUB
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COIIII[ISSION
IN THE MATTER OF
APPLICATION BY
HAROLD E. MULLIS D/B/A
WHITE FOREST WASTEWATER TREATMENT
FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
AND NECESSITY AND FOR APPROVAL OF RATES
TESTIMONY OF
KATHERINE A. FERNALD
SUPERVISOR, WATER SECTION
APRIL 10, 2002
ACCOLTNTInG DIVISION

1 presents the net operating income for a return. Schedule 4 presents the
2 calculation of operating ratios.
4 Q. WHAT CONCLUSIONS HAVE YOU REACHED AS TO THE COMPANY'S
RATE INCREASE REQUEST?
6 A. Based on my investigation, the level of test year operating revenue
7 deductions requiring a return (total operating expenses excluding regulatory
fee, gross receipts tax, and income taxes) is $11,239. The Company's
9 original cost rate base is $1,107. As allowed under G.S. 62-133.1, I have
10 used the operating ratio method to evaluate the Company's proposed
11 revenue requirement.
12
13 Based on my investigation, I recommend that the rates be set to produce
14 $13,266 of operating revenues. This annual level of revenues of $13,266 will
15 provide the Company with the opportunity to earn a return of 8.5%, the
16 reasonable rate set forth by Public Staff Financial Analyst Craig in his
17 affidavit.
18
19 Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY PUBLIC STAFF ENGINEER
20 FLOYD HAVE YOU INCLUDED IN YOUR EXHIBIT?
21 A. My exhibit reflects the following adjustments recommended by Public Staff
22 Engineer Floyd:
23 (1) Service revenues under interim rates
24 (2) Service revenues under proposed rates

CASH WORKING CAPITAL, NET OF AVERAGE TAX ACCRUALS
2 Q. WHY HAVE YOU INCLUDED A CASH WORKING CAPITAL ALLOWANCE,
NET OF AVERAGE TAX ACCRUALS?
4 A. Cash working capital, net of average tax accruals, provides the Company with
funds necessary to carry on its day-to-day operations. In my calculation, I
6 have included 1/8 of operating and maintenance expenses as a measure of
7 cash working capital. Average tax accruals were calculated as 1/2 of property
8 taxes and 116 of gross receipts tax.
9
10 SALARIES AND WAGES
11 Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR ADJUSTMENT TO SALARIES AND WAGES.
12 A. In a letter to the Public Staff, the Company estimated administration fees
13 related to the system of $1,200 per year. However, the Company has not
14 provided any detailed calculations, including estimated hours and hourly
15 rates, to support its estimate. Based on the administrative duties to be
16 performed by Mr. Mullis, the limited number of customers to be billed, the fact
17 that the service rates are flat rates, and the limited number of bills to be paid, I
18 have included $640 of salaries and wages for administrative duties.
19
20 ADMINISTRATIVE AND OFFICE EXPENSE
21 Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENT HAVE YOU MADE TO ADMINISTRATIVE AND
22 OFFICE EXPENSE?

'Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Date: September 12, 1990
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Mecklenburg
NPDES Permit No.: NC0063932
MRO No.: 90-138
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: William S. Neel, Executor
Northeast Plaza, Ltd.
White Forest Development
P.O. Box 1085, Mooresville, NC 28115
2. Date of Investigation: August 27, 1990
3. Report Prepared By: Kim H. Colson -Environmental Engineer I
4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Ken Morrow, Rodney Lang
(ORC), Steve Kelley (Mecklenburg County Environmental
Protection Dept.)
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 2803 (Plaza
Road. Ext.) and SR 2826 (Hood) travel south on SR 2826
approximately 0.6 miles. The wastewater treatment plant is
on the right.
6. Discharge Point(s), LList for all discharge Points:
Latitude: 35° 15' 2"
Longitude: 81° 41' 25"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and
discharge point on map.
USGS Quad. No.: F16-SW
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): There is
adequate land available for expansion and upgrading.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The
treatment plant is in a flat area that appears to be located
within the flood plain of Reedy Creek.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: No dwellings are located within
500 feet.

Surface Waters: Unnamed Tributary
edeiving Stream or Affected
'fReedy-Creek.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin -Pee Dee 03-07-11
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: No known downstream uses other than
general "C" classification uses.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND ThEATMET WORKS
1. Type of Wastewater: 100% Domestic
0% Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.017 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: N/A
c. Prevalent toxic constituentsin wastewater: N/A
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
2. Production Rates (industrial discharges only) in Pounds: N/A
3. Description of Industrial Process (for industries only) and.
Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A
4. Type of Treatment (specify whether proposed or existing):
Existing treatment consist of septic tanks for each individual
residence, bar screen, 9000 gallon aeration tank, 3000 gallon
clarifier, 1,735 gallon aerated sludge tank, and a 375 gallon
chlorine contact tank with a tablet chlorinator.
5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Private septic tank
pumping and hauling facility.
6. Treatment Plant Classification: Less than 5 points; no rating
(include rating sheet). Class II
7, SIC Cade(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s):
Primary: 05
Secondary:
PART III - OTHER PERTINENTNFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring requests: N/A

Three
Additional effluent limits requests: N/A
4, Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous waste
utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air
quality or groundwater? N/A
Other:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. William Neel, Executor of the Marshall Crouch Estate, has
applied for permit renewal for Northeast Plaza, Ltd. Mr. Crouch was
a general partner in Northeast Plaza, Ltd.
Several problems exist with the facility as constructed. The
facility appears to be constructed in the 100 year flood plain of
Reedy Creek. The elevation of the 100 year flood is 636.1 ft.
according to Mecklenburg County. The elevation of the WWTP was
estimated at 635 using the bridge at SR 2826 and Reedy Creek as a
reference point (elev. 637).
The outfall discharges into a small unnamed tributary to Reedy
Creek. The discharge is approximately 40 feet upstream from the
confluence of the unnamed tributary and Reedy Creek.
The current effluent limitations may need to be revised due to
the proximity of other nearby WWTP's on Reedy Creek.
This office recommends that the subject permit be renewed
provided the above mentioned concerns are addressed.
Signature of Report Preparer Date
9l// f
Water Quaff regional Supervisor Date

PART I
SOC Priority Project:
If Yes, SOC No.:
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Susan Robson
Date: March 23, 1994
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Mecklenburg
Permit No. NC0063932
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:
Yes No X
White Forest Subdivision
Northeast Plaza, LTD.
Post Office Box 1085
Mooresville, North Carolina
Date of Investigation: March 16, 1994
28115
Report Prepared by: Kim H. Colson, Environmental Engineer I
4 Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Rod Lang, (704) 597-
7162.
Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 2803 (Plaza
Road Ext.) and SR 2826 (Hood Road), travel south on SR 2826
approximately 0.6 miles. The wastewater treatment plant is
located on the right side of the road.
6 Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 15' 02" Longitude: 80° 41' 25"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site
and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No.: F16SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Harrisburg, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
Yes.
8. Topography (relationship to
lood plain included): Flat
slopes; the WWTP is located within the 100 year flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
a.
b.
c.
Classification: C
River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin -
Describe receiving stream features
downstream uses: Receiving stream is
creek with sandy/muddy bottom. There are
wastewater discharges in the same basin.
classification uses downstream.
Reedy Creek
Pee Dee 030711
and pertinent
a moderate size
several other
General "C"

SCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
olume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.017 MGD
(ultimate design capacity)
Current permitted capacity of the wastewater treatment
facility: 0.017 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity): 0.017 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years: N/A
e . Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Existing
WWT facilities consist of a bar screen, aeration basin,
clarifier, chlorine disinfection, and aerated sludge
holding tank.
Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: N/A
g . Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
2 Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No.: N/A
Residuals Contractor: N/A
Telephone No.: N/A
b. Residuals stabilization: N/A
c. Landfill: N/A
d Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Sludge is
pumped. by Liquid Waste, Inc., and disposed at a CMUD WWTP.
Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): Class II'
4. SIC Code(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s)
Primary: 05 Secondary:
Main Treatment Unit Code: 06007
PART III -- OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved? N/A

or
tations (including toxic
y)
SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates (Please
N/A
ve Analysis Evaluation:
Irrigation: N/A
inection to Regional Sewer System: N/A
ubsurface: N/A
Other disposal options: Another package type WWTP (McCarron
Subdivision — NC0071781) is located downstream on the east
side of Hood Road. The permittee should investigate
connecting to this WWTP.
Air quality and/or groundwater concerns or hazardous materials
utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air
quality, or groundwater: There are no air quality,
groundwater, or hazardous materials concerns.
6. Other Special Items: N/A
PART IV
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The permittee, Northeast Plaza, LTD., has applied for permit
renewal. The development continues to be tied up in the estate of
Marshall Crouch who was a general partner.
It is recommended that the facility investigate connection to
the other package WWTP as stated above since the estate may have
limited financial ability to maintain the WWTP; also the WWTP is
located within the 100 year flood plain. There are only 4 houses
connected to the WWTP. The McCarron Subdivision WWTP is operated
by a utility. The existing McCarron WWTP may be adequate to handle
the design flow from both subdivisions without expanding.
It is recommended that the permit be renewed with a condition
requiring the permittee to investigate connection to the
neighboring WWTP.
nature of report preparer
Water QualityRegional Supervisor
Date 7/-Z 1.4

1998
Mr. Mark McIntyre, F.E.
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh. N.C. 27626-0535
Re: Proposed NPDES Permit Expansion
McCarron Waste Treatment Plant
NPDES NC0071781
Mecklenburg County
LDESI P.N. 87107
Dear Mark:
On behalf of Rayco Utilities, Inc., and the Harry Grimmer Company, we are submitting herewith
an application, S400.00 application fee, and supporting documentation for a proposed expansion of
the McCarron Waste Treatment Plant. The plant discharges to Reedy Creek, and no change in the
discharge location is proposed. The filing of this application is based upon the results of an
engineering evaluation and alternatives analysis in accordance with Title 15A NCAC 2H .0105 (c)
(2), which is presented in the attached Preliminary Engineering Report.
We respectfully request your review of the enclosed and welcome any questions or comments. As
presented in the Report conclusions, the proposed plant expansion appears to represent the most
viable option for providing wastewater service to the Dulin site, proposed for development by the
Harry Grimmer Company. The Dulin site is immediately adjacent to the McCarron Waste Treatment
Plant, and is shown in the Figures in the Report.
As discussed in the Report, in addition to the expansion providing service to the Dulin site, it would
also provide the opportunity for possible abandonment of the existing White Forest Waste Treatment
Plant, a 0.017 MGD facility (NPDES NC0013932). Rayco Utilities has indicated a willingness to
provide service to this system, provided the Owner(s) assume the responsibility for any required line
extensions to facilitate the connection.
1700 East Boulevard
Cnarlone, NC 28203
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
14-C Oak Branch Drive
Greensboro. NC 27407
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

ark McIntyre
January 23, 1998
Page Two
This project has been submitted directly to you as follow-up to yob oive Esticznwith Mr. Grimmer,
in late December, and we appreciate your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
Dale C. Stewart, P.E.
Enclosures
cc: Mike Rackley
Leonard Stogner

FEB
PRELIMINARY REPORT
WATER AND SEWER TO SERVE
THE D ULIN SITE
PREPARED FOR
THE HARRY GRIMMER COMPANY
MECKLEN"Y.B 'R G COUNTY
JANUARY, 1998
ENGINEERING SERVICES INC.
1700 EAST BOULEVARD CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
E

SECTION 1 - GENERAL
1.01 Introduction
The Harry Grimmer Company has under contract and an option to purchase an approximately 153
acre tract of land in eastern Mecklenburg County for a proposed single family residential community
development. The site is located off Plaza Road Extension, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure
1. Mr. Mike Rackley [phone] is manager for the project. The company has retained the
services of LandDesign Engineering Services, Inc., for the conduct of a preliminary engineering
study to determine the most feasible options for providing the site with water and sewer service.
1.02 Scope of Study
The scope of this study is limited to the identification and evaluation of water supply and sewage
disposal/treatment alternatives The study includes review of existing public and private utility
systems for possible connection, on site wells and sewage disposal, and possible new discharge to
Reedy Creek. which runs along the eastern boundary of the site. This study has been conducted in
accordance with Title 15A NCAC 2H .0105(c) (2), and good engineering practice. Information
included herein has been provided by the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department (CMUD),
Carolina Water Service (CWS), Rayco Utilities, Soil Conservation Service, and Mr. Toney Jacobs,
CPSS. The assistance of these organizations and individuals is gratefully acknowledged.
1

SECTION 2 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.01 Project Area
The Dui in Site is located in eastern Mecklenburg County approximately 8,400' from the Charlotte
City Limits. It has approximately 2,100 1.f. of frontage along Plaza Road Extension, across from
Reedy Creek Elementary School. The site is in the Crab Orchard Township.
As shown on Figure 2, several neighborhoods are under development in the area, generally as a
result of the availability of private utility service from Carolina Water Service, Rayco Utilities or
Bradfield Water Company. Several older subdivisions exist on larger lots on well and septic
systems. Public utility service is presently unavailable in the area.
The area is primarily residential in character with very minor commercialiretail uses. As shown on
Figure 2. the proposed I-485 Charlotte Outerloop will be located in close proximity to the Dulin site
with an interchange at Robinson Church Road, and will cross Plaza Road Extension, approximately
3,600 feet from the site.
2.02 Site Characteristics
A copy of the Mecklenburg County aerial topographic survey for the site is shown as Figure 3. The
topography is very gentle along the frontage of Plaza Road, and falls away to the eastern boundary
along Reedy Creek. Reedy Creek is a major tributary in the area, and as shown on Figure 2, creates
a flood plain area along the creek.
Although the tract has been historically used for farming over parts of the site, it is now
predominately wooded. The older fields are gown up insmall pines, vines and briars. Other areas
are in hardwoods, including the floodplain. Two smaller drainage tributaries run into the site from
Reedy Creek.
An on -site review was conducted by Toney Jacobs, CPSS for the purposes of soil suitability and
identification of key physical features. His report is presented in Appendix A, and provides
additional information on existing conditions on the site.
The total area of the site is 153.18 acres. Approximately 9 acres lie within the floodplain of Reedy
Creek. The location of the site within the Reedy Creek Drainage Basin is shown on Figure 4. The
contributory area of Reedy Creek Basin to this site is approximately 7,020 acres.

2.03 Zoning/Land Use
The Dulin site is presently zoned R-4 under the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Zoning Ordinance, which
allows for a maximum density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. Based on the site acreage, this
zoning allows for a theoretical lot count of 612. A preliminary sketch plan was prepared by
Environmental Design, P.A., in November, 1997 to determine the approximate developability of the
site based on zoning, topography, floodplain, and other physical features, and the Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Subdivision Ordinance. A reprint of this sketch plan is shown as Figure 5, and
indicates a lot total of 495, with three basic lot sizes, the smallest being 7,200 square feet.
This zoning classification is typical of much of Mecklenburg County's outlying areas, which now
permits higher -density. A section of the zoning map for this area of the County is presented as
Figure 6.

LI
SECTION 3 - EXISTING IJTILI lES
3.01 Public Facilities
The Charlorte-MecklenburgUtility Department presently serves the City of Charlotte, the five
smaller incorporated Towns of Cornelius, Davidson, Huntersville, Pineville, and Matthews, and
significant portions of the unincorporated areas in Mecklenburg County. CMUD is in the process
of serving the Town of Mint Hill. The majority of CMUD service area lies in the Catawba River
Basin. However, the Mallard Creek Plant serves a large area in the northeast section, which lies in
the Rocky River/Yadkin River Basin. Some smaller areas within this basin are pumped back to the
Catawba River Basin. Only a very small portion of the area, in the upper reaches of the Reedy Creek
Basin, is provided sewer service by pumping back to the Catawba River Basin side of the system.
The existing facilities maintained by CMUD in the vicinity of the Dulin Site are shown on Figure
7. The current long range Capital Improvements Plans for CNIUD is shown on Figure 8.
Reedy Creek flows naturally into Cabarrus County. The County has a regional plant on the Rocky
River, and some service in the Reedy Creek Basin, however, the limits of the system are several
miles downstream from the Dulin site.
CMUD and Cabarrus County Water and Sewer Authority have reached a historic agreement to
cooperate in the provision of sewer service to areas of Mecklenburg County, which naturaily flow
into Cabarrus County. Several major line extensions are underway in the northern sections of both
counties. This new service area is shown on Figure 9. There are no immediate plans for extension
into the Reedy Creek Basin, however, a regional study has been completed with the coordination of
Stanley, Union, and Cabarrus Counties, and CNIUD. A reprint of the likely future service areas,
which would result from implementation of a regional plan is shown as Figure 10. However, it is
anticipated that several years will be required to refine costs, execute regional aueements, and build
actual facilities.
3.02Private Facilities
As noted previously, due to the absence of public services, development in the area has occurred
utilizing on -site well and septic, or with the franchising of private utility areas. Four principal
private utility operators exist in the area, and the respective service areas are shown on Figure 11.
The following paragraphs describe each service area and basic existing facilities.
4

3.02.01 Mid -South Water Systems, Inc.
Mid -South Water Systems, Inc., serves the Farrnwood North Subdivision with only water from
existing wells. The Stone Mountain and Willows Creek Subdivision are served water and sewer
with sewage treatment at the Crossire Creek Treatment Plant (150,000 gpd). The Brantley Oaks
Subdivision is also provided sewer service from this plant, but is provided water from CMUD. Mid -
South currently has no facilities in the Reedy Creek Basin, and all of the capacity of the Crossire
Creek Plant is either utilized or reserved.
3.02.02 Carolina Water Service
The Carolina Water Service (CWS) system in the project area is extensive. The company presently
provides water andsewer to the following communities. Bradford Park, Victoria Park, Cabarrus
Woods, Brookstead, Cambridge, Turtle Creek, Britley and Steeplechase. Expansions are also
underway to serve other developments. Sewer treatment for the CWS service area is provided at the
Cabarrus Woods Waste Treatment Plant. The existing permit for this plant allows expansion up to
950,000 gpd. The current in place capacity is 450,000 ;pd.
3.02.03 Bradfield Water Company
This utility provides water and sewer service primarily to the Bradfield Farms Subdivision, an
approximately 1,200 unit residential development. Service is also provided to Silverton and
Woodland Farms. The sewer treatment is provided in the Bradfield Farms Waste Treatment Plant,
located on McKee Creek. The plant has an in place capacity of 460,000 gpd, with a permit capacity
of 700,000 gpd. All capacity is either utilized or reserved.
3.02.04 Rayco Utilities
Rayco owns and operates the water and sewer facilities serving, the McCarron Subdivision, off Hood
Road, a 107 lot development. The plant has a permitted capacity of 49,950 gpd, with the existing
plant in -place at the rated capacity. There is one community well serving the existing, customers.
i

1
1
SECTION 4 - ALTERNATIVES FOR SERVICE
4,01 On -Site Septic/Spray Irrigation
A study of the existing soils on the Dulin site was conducted by Mr. Toney Jacobs, CPSS. A report
of his findings is included in Appendix A. The results indicate that approximately one half of the
existing site is "provisionally suitable" soils for ground absorption systems. Based on Mr. Jacobs
evaluation, including topography and floodway as well as soils, the estimated yield for the Dulin site
utilizing ground absorption is 150 lots. As the present zoning allows on R-4 density and preliminaiy
plans indicate a potential yield of 495 lots, utilizing on -site septic does not appear to be an
economically viable alternative for the site.
Mr. Jacobs also evaluated the site for possible spray irrigation and estimated a potential yield of 300
lots based on setting aside approximately 48 acres in a dedicated disposal site. This does not allow
for area required for plant construction and wet weather storage. This significant reduction lot yield
renders this an undesirable, unviable alternative also. The potential for off -site acquisition of other
property suitable for a land application site appears low due to the extent of development in the area_
4.02 Rayco Utilities
As noted previously, Rayco operates the McCarron water and sewer system. A copy of the NPDES
permit for the McCarron Waste Treatment Plant is presented in Appendix B. The existing water
system is limited with only one well supplying existing customers. The capacity of the treatment
plant is 49,950.
The Harry Grimmer Company has received a proposal from Rayco for the possible expansion of the
McCarron Plant. Therequired additional capacity to serve the Dulin site would be approximately
178,200 gpd (459 connections X 360 gpd/connection). The existing McCarron Subdivision calls for
a build -out of 102 lots or 38,520 gpd. The Dulin site and the McCarron site are contiguous for a
section of their common boundary along Reedy Creek, which would allow conveyance of
wastewaters to the plant.
The White Forest Plant serves a small subdivision offHood Road. A copy of the NPDES permit for
this plant is provided in Appendix C. The plant has a rated capacity of 17,000 gpd. There is an
interest by the current owners in abandoning this facility and connecting to the McCarron system
with the White Forest system, the total flow to a potentially expanded McCarron Waste Treatment
Plant would be 233,720 gpd (178,200 + 38,520 ± 17,000).
Under this alternative water supply would need to be provided by on -site wells on the Dulin site or
by extension of public water from the CMUD system. Rayco has indicated no objection to providing
only sewer service to the site. This alternative is depicted in Figure 12.
- 6 -

oiina Water Service
CWS has also provided a proposal for service to the Dulin site, which is summarized in a letter from
the Harry Grimmer Company in Appendix E. The proposal calls for water service via extension of
Plaza Road Extension from near the entrance to the Brookstead Subdivision as
depicted in Figure 13. Sewer service would require the installation of a pump station on the Dulin
site and a force main through the development, and along Plaza Road Extension again to Brookstead.
Sewerage reatment would be providedin. the Cabarrus Woods Waste Treatment Plant.
CWS has indicated that sewer service would only be provided if water service was also from their
system (i.e., ownership of both water and sewer in the Dulin project).
4.04 Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department
CMUD has existing major water facilities on Plaza Road Extension at Plott Road (Figure 7), and has
recently completed the design of an extension of a 16" water main alone Plaza Road Extension to
Hood Read. This water main is expected to be installed in 1998. Service could be extended along.
Plaza Road Extension to the Dulin site under the CMUD reimbursable program, in which. the
developer pays up front for the construction, and is then reimbursed over 5 years at 20% per year.
The CMUD sewer system ends near Plott Road as shown on Figure 7, and presently there is no
potential for sewer service as stated in a letter from CMUD presented in Appendix F. However, it
is anticipated that ultimately this area of the Reedy Creek Basin would be served through a
cooperative agreernent with Cabarrus County.
7

SECTION 5 - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
5.01 Basin for Comparison
After review of the various alternatives for serving the Dulin site, capable of allowing for the
permitted development under the current zoning, two alternatives were selected for economic
comparison.
First, CWS provided a proposal for water and sewer service by extension from existing systems
serving the Cabarrus Woods area. This option requires the dedication of three sites within the Dulin
property for new community wells.
The second alternate would actually combine the services for water from CMUD and sewer by
expansion of the McCarron Waste Treatment Plant by Rayco Utilities.
The alternatives were compared on the basis of capital costs, including non -construction items such
as tap fees, and operation and maintenance costs annualized over a 20 year design life.
5.02 Capital Costs
A detailed breakdown of estimated construction costs for each alternate are presented in Appendix
G. The costs are based on respective proposals received, current bidding experience in the Charlotte
area with similar construction, and estimates of the actual quantities of various items (piping, etc.),
required in each alternative. Non -construction items were included in capital costs and covered such
items as survey and design, legal allowances, capacity changes, and tap fees. The capital costs
totaled $1,580,240.00 for the CWS service and $1,308,680.00 for the Rayco Utilities/CMUD
alternatives.
5.03 Operation and Maintenance Costs
The operation and maintenance costs associated with the constructed facilities in each alternative
were also estimated and included in the overall comparison of costs in Appendix G. The annualized
O&M for the CWS alternate was $681,733.00, and for the Rayco/CMUD alternate $765,196.00.
The respective total of all costs for each alternative were:
Capital Costs 0 & M Grand
Water Sewer Total Costs Total
CWS 650,800.00 929,440.00 1,580,240.00 681,733.00 2,261,973.00
Rayco/CMUD 291,980.00 1,016,700.00 1,308,680.00 765,196.00 2,073,876.00
8

Based on the results of the costs estimates, the Rayco/CMUD alternative indicates a cost savings of
approximately $188,000.00 over the life of the facilities.
5.04 Other Considerations
There are two other items which should be considered in final selection of the alternative proposed
for serving the Dulin site. Rayco has indicated a willingness to accept the White Forest Subdivision
into the McCarron System based on the potential approval of a plant expansion, which would
eliminate the existing plant and discharge, and also a willingness to allow CMUD to own and
operate both the water system in the Dulin site and the sewer collection system. Preliminary
discussions with CMUD have indicated an interest in owning the collection system and executing
an agreement with Rayco for treatment in the expanded McCarron Plant. Such an agreement would
simplify the future abandonment of the McCarron Plant as the CMUD/Cabanas County regional
system is expanded, and avail the necessity for future buyout of the system.
9

1
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.01 Summary
An engineering study has been completed to identify and evaluate, on the basis of feasibility and
costs, the potential for water and sewer service to a proposed single-family residential development
on the Dulin Property in eastern Mecklenburg County. The results of the study indicate the most
economically viable alternative to be the extension of water service from the CMUD system, and
the provision of sewer service by agreement with Rayco Utilities and expansion of the McCarron
Waste Treatment Plant,
6.02 Recommendations
Based on the conclusions reached in this study the following_ actions are recommended:
File an application for expansion of the NPDES permit for the McCarron Waste Treatment
Plant.
2. Execute a reimbursable contract with CMUD for extension of water service.
3. Facilitate agreements with CMUD and Rayco Utilities for ownership of the collection system
by 0/IUD and bulk sewer service to the site by Rayco.
4. Facilitate abandonment of the White Forest Waste Treatment Plant.
- 1 0 -

EX-1
McCarron Expansion 809032
SECTION 3
EXISTING UTILITIES
3.01 PUBLIC FACILITIES
The Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department (CMUD) presently serves the City of
Charlotte, the five smaller incorporated Towns of Cornelius, Davidson, Huntersville,
Pineville, Matthews, and. Mint Hill, and significant portions of the unincorporated areas in
Mecklenburg County. CMUD has also extended service to the Town of Mint Hill. The
majority of CMUD service in this area lies in the Catawba River Basin. Some smaller areas
within this basin are pumped back to the Catawba River Basin. Only a very small portion of
the area, in the upper reaches of the Reedy Creek Basin, is provided sewer service by
pumpingback to the Catawba River Basin side of the system.
The existing facilities maintained by CMUD in the vicinity of the service area are shown in
Figure 5. The current long range Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for CMUD is shown in
Figure 6.
Reedy Creek flows naturally into Cabarrus County. The County has a regional plant on the
Rocky River, and some service in the Reedy Creek Basin; however, the limits of the system
are several miles downstream from the service area.
CMUD and Cabarrus County Water and Sewer Authority have reached agreement to
cooperate in the provision of sewer service to areas of Mecklenburg County, which naturally
flow into Cabarrus County. Several major line extensions are underway in the northern
sections of both Counties. However, it is anticipated that it will be several years before sewer
reaches the upper region of the Reedy Creek Basin, even though the trunk sewers are
depicted on Figure 6.
3.02 PRIVATE FACILIITES
As noted previously, due to the absence of public services, development in the area has
occurred utilizing on -site well and septic, or through franchising private utility areas. Four
principal private utility operators exist in the area, and the respective service areas are shown
in Figure 7. The following paragraphs describe each service area and basic existing facilities.
3.02.01 Heater Utilities
Heater Utilities serves the Stone Mountain and Willows Creek Subdivisions with sewage
treatment at the Crossire Creek Treatment Plant (150,000 gpd). The Brantley Oaks Sub-
division is also provided sewer service from this plant, but is provided water from CMUD.
Heater Utilities currently has no facilities in the Reedy Creek Basin and all of the capacity of
the Crossire Creek Plant is either utilized ©r reserved.

3.02.02
Carolina Water Service
EX-2
McCarron Expansion 309032
The Carolina Water Service (CWS) system in the project area is extensive. The company
presently provides water and sewer to the following communities: Bradford Park, Victoria
Park, Cabarrus Woods, Brookstead, Cambridge, Turtle Creek, Britley and Steeplechase.
Expansions are also underway to serve other developments. Sewer treatment for the CWS
service area is provided at the Cabarrus Woods Waste Treatment Plant. The existing permit
for this plant allows expansion up to 950,000 gpd. The current in -place capacity is 450,000
gpd. Rayco and CWS have no existing agreements for system interconnection and have
separate franchise service areas.
3.02.03 Bradfield Water Company
This utility provides water and sewer service primarily to the Bradfield Farms Subdivision, a
residential development of approximately 1,200 units. Service is also provided to Silverton
and Woodland Farms. The sewer treatment is provided in the Bradfield Farms Waste
Treatment Plant, located on McKee Creek. The plant has an in -place capacity of 460,000
gpd, with a permit capacity of 700,000 gpd All capacity is either utilized or reserved.
3.02.04 Rayco Utilities
Rayco owns and operates the water and sewer facilities serving the McCarron Subdivision,
off Hood Road, a 107 lot development. The plant has a permitted capacity of 250,000 gpd.
The existing plant with a capacity of 49,950 gpd has a planned expansion and pending ATC
for a capacity of 244,000 gpd to allow service to the Reedy Creek Plantation Development, a
505 lot single-family subdivision. Rayco anticipates providing service, pending operating
agreements, to the White Forest Development to allow abandonment of the White Forest
Waste Treatment Plant just upstream of McCarron Subdivision. The White Forest Waste
Treatment Plant is a 0.017 mgd facility treating septic tank effluent from the White Forest
Subdivision.
END OF SECTION

ALT-1
McCarron Expansion 89032
a
i
SECTION 4
ALTERNATIVES FOR SERVICE
4.01 ON -SITE SETPIC/SPRAY IRRIGATION
A soils map of the service area is included as Figure 8. Soils generally are cecil series on
upland areas, which are generally suitable for large lot septic systems and change to less
desirable soils as the land falls away to Reedy Creek and it's tributaries. The use of septic
would not be feasible for R-4 zoning without the sacrifice of a significant number of lots.
Also, it is not feasible to develop the zoned business areas on septic systems in this area
without significant areas of land being dedicated to the septic fields. The combination of land
parcels in the proposed service area could yield approximately 300 lots, and when combined
with the B-1 (CD) property, could produce flows of approximately 120,000 gpd.
Approximately 35 - 40 acres would be required for spray irrigation of this quantity of flow,
plus required buffers, which would severely restrict the potential land for development in the
service area. The potential for acquisition of land suitable for land application outside the
service area is low due to the extent of overall development in the area_
4.02 RAYCO UTILITIES
As noted previously, Rayco operates the McCarron water and wastewater system. A copy of
the NPDES permit for the McCarron Waste Treatment Plant is presented in Appendix A. The
capacity of the treatment plant is 49,950 with an expansion to 244,000 gpd pending.
The Harry Grimmer Company has a commitment from Rayco for the expanstion of the
McCarron Plant. The required additional capacity to serve the Grimmer site would be
approximately 181,800 gpd (505 connections x 360 gpd/connection). The existing McCarron
Subdivision calls for a build -out of 107 lots or 38,520 gpd. The Grimmer site and the
McCarron site are contiguous for a section of their common boundary along Reedy Creek
which would allow conveyance of wastewaters to the plant.
The White Forest Plant serves a small subdivision off Hood Road. A copy of the NPDES
permit for this plant is provided in Appendix B. The plant has a rated capacity of 17,000 gpd.
There is an interest by the current owners in abandoning this facility and connecting to the
McCarron system with the White Forest system, the total flow to a potentially expanded
McCarron Waste Treatment Plant would be 237,320 gpd (181,800 ± 38,520 + 17,000).
With the plant expansion planned for 244,000 gpd, this leaves very little capacity for the
proposed service area. The McCarron Plant is very adaptable to a plant expansion to 366,000
gpd, which would be appropriate for the proposed service area. A site plan of the existing
McCarron Waste Treatment Plant is shown as Figure 9, on which is depicted the potential

ALT-2
McCarron Expansion 89032
layout and process components required for an expansion to 366,000 pd. Figure 10 depicts
the service area, plant, and sewer for service to the area.
4.03 CAROLINA WATER SERVICE
CWS has provided proposals for service to other sites in the area that typically require the
developer to install all system components and pay a sewer tap fee of $1,100.00 per lot plus a
treatment capacity fee of $300.00 per lot. Sewer service would require the installation of a
pump station at the McCarron Plant and a force main to the Cabarrus Woods Waste
Treatment Plant. This alternate is depicted as Figure 11.
4.04 CHARL©1-1`E-MECKLENBURG UTILITY DEPAR
CIvIUD has existing major water facilities on Plaza Road Extension at Plott Road, and has
recently completed the design of an extension of a 16-inch water main along Plaza Road
extension to Hood Road. This water main is expected to be completed this year.
The CMUD sewer system ends near Plott Road as shown on Figure 5, and presently there is
no potential for sewer service from CMUD to this area. However, it is anticipated that
ultimately this area of the Reedy Creek Basin would be served through a cooperative
agreement with Cabarrus County. During the original investigation of sewer service to the
Dulin property — Reedy Creek Plantation, CMUD provided a letter to the Harry Grimmer
Company indicating that service could not be provided to this area due to the lack of capacity
in the Plott Road Pump Station. This status has not changed, and the anticipated ultimate
technique for public service is from Cabarrus County.
END OF SECTION

EVAL-1
McCarron Expansion 89032
SECTION 5
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SERVICE
5.01 BASIS FOR COMPARISON
After review of the various alternatives for serving the proposed service area, capable of
allowing the permitted development under the proposed zoning, two alternatives were
selected for economic comparison.
First, would be CWS, based on their typical sewer service proposal, by extension
from the existing systems serving the Cabarrus Woods area. It is not known for
certain that an agreement could be reached with CWS for service to this area.
2. The second alternative would be by expansion of the McCarron Waste Treatment
Plant by Rayco Utilities.
The alternatives were compared on the basis of capital costs, including non -construction
items such as tap fees, and operation and maintenance costs annualized over a 20-year design
life.
5.02 CAPITAL COSTS
A detailed breakdown of estimated construction costs for each alternative are presented in
Appendix D. The costs are based on current bidding experience in the Charlotte area with
similar construction, and estimates of the actual quantities of various items (piping, etc.),
required in each alternative. Non -construction items were included in capital costs and
covered such items as survey and design., legal allowances, and capacity changes, and tap
fees. The capital costs totaled $1,333,700.00 for the CWS service and $708,500.00 for the
Rayco Utilities alternatives.
5.03 OPERATION AND 'CE COSTS
The operation and maintenance costs associated with the constructed facilities in each
alternative were also estimated and included in the overall comparison of costs in Appendix
D. The annualized O&M for the CWS alternate was $585,633.00, and for the Rayco alternate
$850,485.00. The respective totals of all costs for each alternative were:
1. CWS
2. Rayco
CAPITAL COSTS O&M GRAND
SEWER COSTS TOTAL
31,333,700.00 $585,633.00 S 1,919,333.00
$ 708,500.00 $850,485.00 $1,558,985.00

EVAL-2
McCarron Expansion 89032
Based on the results of the cost estimates, the Rayco alternative indicates a cost savings of
approximately $360,348.00 over the life of the facilities.
5.03 ©T ER CONSIDERATIONS
There are two other items, which should be considered in final selection of the alternative
proposed for serving this area. Rayco has indicated a willingness to accept the White Forest
Subdivision into the McCarron system, which would eliminate the existing plant and
discharge. Although no certain date is known for the provision of public service to this area,
it is anticipated that the McCarron Waste Treatment Plant will ultimately be abandoned as
CMUD/Cabarrus County extend trunk sewers into this area and the development of a
customer base will tend to off -set the extensive collection system cost required to extend
service up Reedy Creek.
END OF SECTION

McCarron Subdivision WWTP — NPDES Renewal Regional Staff Report Page
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Susan Wilson
Date: September 29, 1999
NPDES ST. 1€ ' REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Mecklenburg
NPDES Permit No.: TIC0071781
MRO No.: 99-132
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility and Address: McCarron Subdivision
c/o Rayco Utilities, Inc.
Physical Address
McCarron Way
Harrisburg, NC
Date of Investigation: September 29, 1999
Report Prepared By: Michael Parker, Environmental
Mailing Address
107 Commercial Drive SW
Concord, NC 28027
4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Rayco Utilities, Inc. [phone]
ORC Name: Don Oates (Certification r 9442)
Backup ORC: Perry Smith and Leonard Stogner
Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 2822 (Robinson Church Rd.) and SR
2826 (Hood Rd.) just east of the City of Charlotte, travel north on SR 2826 approx. 0.3
mile and turn right on Kentshire Lane (no SR number). Travel approx. 75 yards and turn
left on McCarron Way (no SR number). Travel approx. 200 yards and turn left onto a dirt
access road. The WWTP is located at the end of the dirt road.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: -
Latitude: 35° 14' 59"
Longitude: 80° 41' 13"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge Point on map.
USGS Quad No.: G 16 NW USGS Quad Name: Mint Hill, NC

McCarron Subdivision WWTP — NPDES Renewal Regional Staff Report
Page 2
7 Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. There appears to be
.adequate land available for future expansion or upgrading.
8. Topography (relationship -to flood plain included): Relatively flat in the vicinity of the
WWTP.. The WWTP site appears to be located within the 100-year flood plain-, however,
all WWT units appear to have been constructedabove flood plain elevation.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: There are several dwellings within 500 feet of the existing
WWTP site.
10. Receiving Stream or Affecte-d Surface -Waters: Reedy Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin — Pee Dee 03-07-11
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The stream
channel is approx.10-20 feet wide and 4-24 inches deep at the point of discharge.
The area both upstream and downstream is generally rural, however, the area is
receiving heavy residential development.
PART 1:1 - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
a. -Volume of Wastewater: 0.0251 MGD (Actual Flow from DMRs)
b Current permitted capacity: 0.04995 MGD with expansion to 0.250 MGD upon
receipt and approval of ATC (as per 6/25/98 permit modification).
c. Design capacity of current facility: 0.04995 MCI)
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the
previous two years: N/A
e. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The edsn
WWT facilities consist of an influent pump station followed by a bar screen, it
removal, equAli7ntion basin, aeration basin, clarifier, chlorine gas disinfection
with contact tank, tertiary filter, aerated sludge bolding tank and a flow recorder
with totalizer.
f. Description of proposed WWT facilities: Mr. Leonard Stogn..r stated th2-Ahe
existing treatment system will be replaced in the near future by a new plant
capable of treating. e.250 MGD. The ATC describing the new system was
reportedly prepared and sent to the DWQ central office sometime last week (3/15-
3/19/1994). -However, DWQ review of the proposed expansionlas not been
_completed. Mr. Stoner stated that construction activities are expected to begin in
June 1999, pencii-ig DWQ review and approval ofthe ATC.
e. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Chlorine is added -to the waste stream.

McCarron Subdivision WWTP — NPDES Renewal Regional Staff -Report
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Not Needed.
Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals are pumped out by
Piedmont Septic Tank (Randy Milton [phone]), which operates in accordance
with Permit NC00772. The residuals are transported to either Rocky River WWTP or
Town Creek WWTP for disposal.
Treatment Plant Classification: Class If (no change from previous rating).
4. SIC Code(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary-05; SecondaryN/A
5. MTU Code(s): 06107
PART Ill - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None at this time.
3. Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: N/A
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: No municipal sewer in the area.
PART TV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The permittee has applied for a modification to the subject permit. The existing WFTF
serves the McCarron Subdivision in northern Mecklenberg County. There have been no
substantial changes to the WWTP since the last staff report (and permit renewal), however, it is
proposed in this Permit modification that the existing WWT system be replaced by a new
WVJTP capable of treating 0.375 MGD of wastewater.
Since the Permit was last renewed, a modification to the permit was approved on .June 2,
1998, for an expansion up to 0 250 MGD. This expansion was authorized to allow the permittee
(Leonard Stogner) to receive the wastewater from a yet -to -be -constructed development called
Reedy Creek Development. Since that time additional requests for capacity have been received
by the permittee, which has prompted the subject modification request. These additional requests
for capacity include a proposed residential development (Pappas Properties) and the eventual
connection of the wastewater from the nearby White Forest Development (NC0063 932), which
has experienced periods of non-compliance over the past several years.
Although the subject WWTP was approved for an expansion up to 0.250 MGD, it is
^1e .. e`h © .- : e e �+ - exists; e rece? ©" rr' cr this
uri...�a- ac tc whether s 1� i nt.ass:�iia'_v caoa A;�. .nth.. __��:� s�a� f4_
proposed increase in flow. Receipt and approval of the WLA will be necessary to make this
determination.

McCarron. Subdivision WWTP — NPDES Renewal Regional Staff Report
Page 4
One important WQ benefit achieved by this expansion is the eventual elimination of the
White Forest WWTP. It is expected, however, that this facility, as well as any others in the
immediate area, will connect to municipal sewer once it becomes available. The modified permit
should contain the appropriate language mandating this requirement.
Therefore, pending receipt and approval of the WLA, it is recommended
be modified as requested
h:\dsr\dsr991.mccarron.doc
Date
water Quality R�ianal Supervisor` / Date
e
P

McCarron Subdivision V1'WTP — NPDES Renewal Reuional Staff Report Page
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Susan Wilson
1Date: September 29, 1999
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Mecklenburg
NPDES Permit No.: NC0071781
MRO No.: 99-132
PART I - GENER4L INFORMATION
Facility and Address: McCarron Subdivision
c/o Rayco Utilities, Inc.
Physical Address
McCarron Way
Harrisburg, NC
Date of Inv
==ation: S
P
ber 29, 1999
MailingAddress
107 Commercial Drive SW
Concord, NC 28027
Report Prepared By: Michael Parker, Environmental Engineer II
Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Rayco Utilities, Inc. (704)788-949 7
ORC Name: Don Oates (Certification r 9442)
Backup ORC: Perry Smith and Leonard Stogner
Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 2822 (Robinson Church Rd.) and SR
2826 (Hood Rd.) just east of the City of Charlotte, travel north on SR 2826 approx. 0.3;
mile and turn right on Kentshire Lane (no SR number). Travel approx. 75 yards and turn
left on McCarron Way (no SR number). Travel approx. 200 yards and turn left onto a din
access road. The Vs7WTP is located at the end of the dirt road.
Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: -
Latitude: 35° 14' 59"
Lonuitude: 80° 41' 13"
.At,.acit a USGS Map E
cate t
nt plant site and discharge point or. reap.
USGS Quad No.: G 16 NW USGS Quad Name: Mint Hill, NC

McCarron Subdivision WWTP — NPDES Renewal Regional Staff Report
Palle
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. There appears to be
adequate land available for future expansion or upgrading.
Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Relatively flat in the vicinity of the
WWTP. The WWTP site appears to be located within the 100-year flood plain; however,
all WWT units appear to have been constructed above flood plain elevation.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: There are several dwellings within 500 feet of the existing
DTP site.
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: Reedy Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin — Pee Dee 03-07-11
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The stream
channel is approx.10-20 feet wide and 4-24 inches deep at the point of discharge.
The area both upstream and downstream is generally rural, however, the area is
receiving, heavy residential development.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
a.
Volume of Wastewater: 0.0251 MGD (Actual Flow from DMRs)
Current permitted capacity: 0.04995 MGD with expansion to 0.250 MGD upon
receipt and approval of ATC (as per 6/25/98 permit modification).
Design capacity of current facility: 0.04995 MGD
Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the
previous two years: N/A
Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The existing
WWT facilities consist of an influent pump station followed by a bar screen, grit
removal, equalization basin, aeration basin, clarifier, chlorine Etas disinfection with
contact tank, tertiary filter, aerated sludge holding tank and a flow recorder with
totalizer.
Description of proposed WWT facilities: Mr. Leonard Stogner stated that the
existing treatment system will be replaced in the near future by a new plant capable
of treating 0.250 MGD. The ATC describing. the new system was reportedly
prepared and sent to the DWQ central office sometime last week (3/15-
3/19/1999). However, DWQ review of the proposed expansion has not been
completed. Mr. Stogner stated that construction activities are expected to begin in
June 1999, pending DWQ review and approval of the ATC.
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Chlorine is added to the waste stream.

McCarron Subdivision WWTP — NPDES Renewal Regional Staff Report Page
Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Not Needed.
Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals are pumped out by Piedmont
Septic Tank (Randy Milton [phone]), which operates in accordance with Permit
NC00772. The residuals aretransported to either Rocky River WWTP or Town Creek
WWTP for disposal.
3. Treatment Plant Classification: Class 1,1 (no change from previous rating).
4. SIC Code(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary-05; Secondary -N/A
5. MTU Code(s): 06107
PART ID - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including, toxicity) requests: None at this time.
3 Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: N/A
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: No municipal sewer in the area.
PART TV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The permittee has applied for a modification to the subject permit. The existing WWTP
serves the McCarron Subdivision in northern Mecklenberg County. There have been no
substantial changes to the WWTP since the last staff report (and permit renewal), however, it is
proposed in this Permit modification that the existing WWT system be replaced by a new WWTP
capable of treating 0.375 MGD of wastewater.
Since the Permit was last renewed, a modification to the permit was approved on June 25.
1998, for an expansion up to 0.250 MGD. This expansion was authorized to allow the permittee
(Leonard Stogner) to receive the wastewater from a yet -to -be -constructed development called
Reedy Creek Development. Since that time additional requests for capacity have been received
by the perrnittee, which has prompted the subject modification request. These additional requests
for capacity include a proposed residential development (Pappas Properties) and the eventual
connection of the wastewater from the nearby White Forest Development (NC0063932), which
has experienced periods of non-compliance over the past several years. One important WQ benefit
achieved by this expansion is the eventual elimination of the White Forest WWTP. It is expected,
however, that this facility, as well as any others in the immediate area, will connect to municipal
sewer once it becomes available. The modified permit should contain the appropriate language
mandating a connection to municipal sewer once it becomes available.

McCarron Subdivision WWTP NPDES Renewal Regional Staff Report Page 4
Although the subject WWTP was approved for an expansion up to 0.250 MGD, it is
unclear as to whether sufficient assimilative capacity exists in the receiving stream for this
proposed increase in flow. It is also our understanding that an overall reduction in nutrients
inputs from point (and non -point) sources in this sub -basin is under consideration. Based on the
amount of development occurring in this area, it would appear likely that municipal sewer will be
extended to this area in the next 5-8 years. Such being the case, it is possible that the existing
WWTP may never approach the anticipated 0375 MGD flow. Receipt and approval of the yet -
to -be -promulgated WLA will be necessary prior to the issuance of the requested Permit
modification.
Therefore, pending receipt and approval of the WLA, it is recommended that the permit
be modified as requested.
'Signiture o Repo eparer Date
r Quality Regional upe
h:vdsrzisr99v-necarronAoe
Date

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes_No c
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Uni
Water Quality Section
Attention: Charles Weaver
Date: August 10, 1999
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Mecklenburg
Permit No. NC 0063932
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility and Address: White Forest TP
1164 Freeland Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
2. Date of Investigation: June 15, 1999
3 Report Prepared By: Samar Bou-Ghazale, Env. Engineer I
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: D.C. Coffee, Operator; [phone]
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 2803 (Plaza Road Ext.) And SR 2826
(Hood Road), travel south on SR 2826 approximately 0.6 miles. The wastewater
treatment plant is located on the right side of the road.
6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35 ° 15'02" Longitude: 80 °41'25"
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on
map_
U.S.G.S. Quad No.: F 16 SW U.S.G.S. Name: Harrisburg, NC
7 Site si7e and expansion are consistent with application?
Yes X No_ If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Topography is flat; the WWTP is

-ted svithin the 100 year flood plain, and the WWT units are not protected from
oo ing•
citation of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet.
eceiving streamor affected surface waters: Reedy Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin Pe.. -Dee; 03-07-11
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving
stream in this area is approximately 10 to 15 feet wide with sandy/muddy bottom.
General C classification uses downstream.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.017 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity)
What is the current perrnitted capacity of the wastewater treatment facility? 0.017
b.
MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? 0.017
MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to
Construct issued in the previous two years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: The existing treatment consists of a bar screen, aeration
basin, clarifier, chlorine disinfection, and aerated sludge holding tank.
Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: None other than chlorine.
g.
h. Pretreatment.Program (POTWs only): N/A
2„ Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
Sludge is removed by Piedmont Septic Services and transported to the Rocky River
Regional WWTP for disposaL
3. Treatment plant classification: Class II (Rating sheet is attached)
4. SIC Code(s): 4952

Secondary:
ent Unit Code: 06007
R PERTINENT INFORMATION
is facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
volved (municipals only)? N/A
ry Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: N/A
Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (please indicate) N/A
Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge
options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated: The
applicant was not required to submit an alternative analysis evaluation since the facility is
not in substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit.
Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Subsurface: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A
6. Other Special Items: In a conversation with the applicant, Mr. Willis, on June 22, 1999,
it was learned that the discharge from the WWT facility will be connected to the
McCarron Subdivision "GWTP whenever the WWTP expansion is completed. It should
be noted that the McCarron T""l` facility has applied for an Authorization to Construct.
Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous materials utilized at this facility
that may impact water quality, air quality, or groundwater: No AQ or GW concerns nor
are hazardous materials utilized at this facility with the exception of chlorine.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. H. E. Mullis with White Forest WWT Trust is requesting renewal of the subject
permit. A review of the past year's self -monitoring data, from 03/98 through 03/99, did not
reveal any limit violations. During the site investigation the wastewater treatment plant appeared
to be in good operational condition. However, since the facility is located in a flood plain, it is
recommended that the discharge from the subject facility be eliminated by the end of this permit
cycle. (See item III.6. above)
Pending review and approval by the P&E, it is recommended that the permit be renewed
with a condition that the discharge be eliminated by the end of the permit cycle.

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 14, 2002
-/obi ,p,nto boos- 681-7
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Land
Charlotte, NC 28212
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty for
Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6) and
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
White Forest WWTP
Case No, LV 02-145
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mullis:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $585.45 ($500.00 civil penalty + $85.45 enforcement costs) against White Forest WWT
Trust.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by White Forest WWT Trust for the month of
December 2001. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the discharge
limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0063932. The violations are suxnma.rized in
Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that White Forest
violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0063932 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment
against White Forest WWT Trust:
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
1 800 623-7748
Fax [phone]

For ? of the two (2) violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0063932, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of the permit daily maximum effluent
limit for Total Suspended Residue.
$— TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 85.45 Enforcement costs.
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
The duration and gravity of the violation;
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
The cost of rectifying the damage;
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
in thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing,
such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative
hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and retum to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and
a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violations;
(c) the violations were inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violation;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review the information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform
you of his decision in the matter of the remission request. His response will
provide details regarding case status, directions for payment and provision for
further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management Commission's
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that the Committee
cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request.
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a.
complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
OR

Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this civil
penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704/663-1699.
(Date)
A 1"1`ACHMENTS
D. Rex G1e on, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

Attachment A
White Forest WWT Trust
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Case Number LV 02-145
Limit Violations, December 2001
Parameter
Total Suspended Residue
Daily Maximum Limit Violations
Reported Value Limit
61.0*,64.7* 45.0
* denotes assessment of civil penalty.
Units
g/L

rSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
'
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF Mecklenburg
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
White Forest WWT Trust
PERMIT NO. NC0063932
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
AND STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 02-145
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated
, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be
submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days
from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
day of , 2002
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

Row.1140
EFFLUENT
PEMIT NO, NC0063932 DISCHARGE NO.
FACILITY NAME WHITE FOREST CLASS
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Perry Smith
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Aauasource. Inc.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIV, OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEHNR
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
HRS
ORC On Site?'
Y!N
60050.000
10.00
1 0 MONTH December YEAR 2001
COUNTY Mecklenburg
GRADE 11 PHONE [phone]
(2)
PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES
Operators
,.- / ,-
X -;:/'7.1.4
(SIGNATURE OF ORATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
BY THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,
400.00 i 50060,0
310 0 610.0
5300.
316160 j 300.0
600 0
6t5:0
95.0 ,
MG 0
0C
UNITS
mg/L
0
0
0-)
E21
0
rngiL
c a)
0
Ee
E
mg/L
(T1g/L
mg/L
01
mg/L
(11
01
0
0 a,
•••-
0
mg/L uhoms
21
31 1055
4
11:00
;015
ylaki,0100.1;44_
v
1 14.00
7,20 1 1.0
,1t
2.0I4_0,11 16.51 42.01 8.0
0:30
61 10:00
7
12:00
0:05
Y
0:::101y
0:15,
14:-.00
1 14.00
;113.00
1,1
.1111,1ERT
%OP
0 1 5
1121 6:20
Q•97
1141 11:05
17
131 9:35
19
120
21
y
aG3
0.001
13.00
7.101 1.0
411.6400.44741"1.
13,00
3.0
.
2
"461.0
)
7 6
.55
9:44
10:05
ti15.1y
•-•
1,1040 y
z1.111604.
I 221
23
1241 1005 ".0,
25 r.tolia4;
25
29
301
31,
10:00
.1.034
9:35
44c ,
AVERAGE
MINIMUM
Comp.:4G)pp'
Monthly Limit
Daily limit/Summer
!Daily limitNVinter 1
13.00
54.001:4-44t k
13.00
Via00
1 1.00
,.'",I.Mittgibt4i..41153,01,2#8[4:400.004,„
0
0.001
0.001
10.00
10.00
9.00
AtAW
1.1.
1.0
1.3
%WM
12.00 1.1
3-5
3.4
0.001 8.00 7.10 1 1.0 1 2.0
0.017
30.0
45.0
45.0
55
0,3
t*,
64.7 20.81
, t ;0!!,04;44. AkSiftk:141401..:
'
•Pt:f.; .„
0.4
731PC kiwi-
7,4
4' ' Ar,;,110144,Pcgt,,,A4411WA444,,
16.0
„ s',V;i4i*Mogf, '4401 8%.1!*-41ititg eilng
0.2 29.8 .6 7.6
15i*'
OA 12.0 2.0 7.4 0.0
5545445
30.0 200.01
45.0 400.01
45.0_ 400.01
T374744 ' '4;t1 444 lit#4'

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
,„
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncomptiant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc., and a time
table for improvements to be made.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my directions or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and compleate. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations."
Kevin Curl.
Perrnittee (Pleaseprint pc -type)
Signature of Perrnittee-
107 Commercial Park Drive, Concord, NC 28027 704-788-9497
Permittee Address
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 60D5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended
Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total igeldhal
Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/ Nitrifies
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
Phone Number
PARAMETER CODES
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01032 Hexavalent Chromium 01147 Total Selenium
01034 Chromium 31616 Fecal Coliforrn
01037 Total Cobalt 32730 Total Phenolics
01042 Copper 34235 Benzene
01045 Iron 34481 Toluene
01051 Lead 38260 MBAS
01067 Nickel 39516 PCBs
01077 Silver 50050 Flow
Date
r-tt
nMrter
Parameter code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534
50060
Total
Chlori
ne
71880
Forma
Me rcu
81551
Xylene
ORC, must visit facilitY and documentwisitation of facilitras required per 15A NCAC 8A .0202 (b) (5) (B).
" The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be:rePorted:es- -a-GEOMETRIC mean, Use only units designated in the reporting facility's perrnit for
reporting data.
If Signed by other than the permittee, delegation -of signatorrauthority rnust be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b) (2) (D).
OLC Form-2 1/21/DO

Permit NCOO6393
A. (1..) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration,
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
BOD, 5-day (202C)
Total Suspended Residue
NH3 as N
(April 1 — October 31)
NH3 as N
(November 1 — March 31)
Dissolved Oxygen
Monthly
Average
0.017 MGD
30.0 mg/L
30,0 ma/L
9,0 mg/L
Fecal Coiiform (geometric mean) 1 200/100 ml
Total Residual Chlorine
LIMITS
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
45.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
400/100 ml
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Measurement
Frequency
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Sample Type
Instantaneous
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Weekly ! Grab
2/Week
Daily
Weekly
Weekly
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Sample Locations
Influent or Effluent
ffluent
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent,
Upstream &
Downstream
Effluent,
Upstream &
Downstream
Effluent
Effluent
Upstream &
Downstream
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Upstream: 100 feet from discharge point; Downstream: 100 feet from discharge point.
2. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts

Fast Track VVorksheet
Case NUMber
Facility Name
Permit Number
Previous Case
in the Last
two years
LV
02
145
White Forest WVVTP
NC0063932
No
Statutory Maxirnun
per violation
Number of Assessments for previous 6 DMRs
0 0 0 3 0 0 05
too
$10,000
Total Assessment Factor =
1.00
Exit
Number Number
Violations Assessed
2
2
Total
Penalty/ Assessment
ParameterViolation Violation Factor Total Penalty
TSR
Weekly av daily
max
$250
Grand Total Penalty
Percent of the Maximum Penalty
Authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
Comments
$500.00
$500.00
2.50
Review month = December 2001
Prepared by Richard Bridgeman

AquaS©urce
A DQECompany
June 14, 2002
6960 Professional Parkway East
Suite 400
Sarasota, Florida 34240
Richard Bridgeman
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment & Natural Resources
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Notice of Violation
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Bridgeman:
941-907-7400
941-907-7441 (fax)
JUN 1 7 2CO2
(C OEPT c- ENVZ
APO NA nitzt i.
REftifit
On behalf of our client, Mr. Gene Mullis, this correspondence is herein submitted to
address issues noted during the Compliance Evaluation Inspection conducted at the above
referenced facility on April 26, 2002, report date of May 30, 2002. As requested this
response will address issues noted under the Permit, Self -Monitoring Program, and
Effluent/Receiving Waters headings of the report.
Permit:
As the contract operator for White Forest, we have not been involved in the Engineering
Alternative Analysis nor the Flood Plain Analysis. As such, we can offer no other
comment on these subjects and must defer to our client.
Effluent Receiving Waters:
ORC, Mr, Perry Smith, has removed the riprap that was placed over the outfall line by
NCDOT and has identified the exact location of discharge.
Self -Monitoring Program:
The results of pH analysis for the week of November 18, 2001 were inadvertently
omitted from the respective DMR during the transposition of data from field log
to the report. A revised DMR including this pH value will be submitted.

Vlog
2. TRC values (twice/week) for the week of November 11, 2001 were on the field
but one of the values had been overlooked. A revised DMR including this
second TRC value will be submitted.
The second of two TRC values analyzed for the week of April 29,2002, was
performed. However since April ended and May began during the same week, the
second value was not included on either DMR. A revised DMR for the month of
May will be submitted including the overlooked second TRC value.
The ORC and the Owner advise that the TSS exceedances during December 2001
were due to elevated flows at the WWTP during a period of inclement weather,
Run-off from heavy rains entered the collection system through a broken sewer
line. This action hydraulically overloaded the WWTP causing turbulence in the
sludge blanket thus resulting in reduced settling time and a discharge of solid
laden water. As told by the Owner, the damage to the collection system occurred
during the boring of the road by CMUD during the installation of a water main
and has been repaired. The Owner has advised us that he is in direct
communication with your office regarding the civil penalty.
4. The effluent samples during April, June, July, August and October 2001, and
January 2002 were properly seeded and analyzed. Analysis was performed at
multiple dilutions including full strength (298m1 of sample = 2 ml of seed). The
seed depleted as expected indicating proper analytical methods but the sample
itself contained very little BOD and could not deplete any further. These results
were reported as less than values (<) on the DMR.
5. Preservatives are always present in sample bottles prior to leaving the laboratory.
Once in the field, variables that could result in loss of preservative include:
overfilling of sample bottle, rinsing bottle prior to taking sample etc... Upon
receipt of the NH3N-N sample for January 22,2002, lab personnel recognized the
sample required further pH adjustment and took such action prior to holding for
subsequent analysis. The chain of custody reflects the sample was received
within the required holding time. Proper sampling procedures will be reviewed
with the staff.
6. Fecal coliform result for February 28, 2002 was intentionally listed as 6.25
co1/100m1. It is our understanding and interpretation of the Laboratory
Certification Committee's position that this is an acceptable way to report results.
To assist in our understanding of the requirements, we respectfully request
additional reference to regulations that may clarify these types of reporting issues.
DMR's for May and November 2001, were mistakenly marked compliant. This was not
intentional and was the result of the oversights herein referenced in this correspondence.

We trust this response is sufficient, however should you have any questions or need
additional information please do not hesitate to contact me directly or you may contact
Dustin Metreyeon, Project Manager, in our Concord office at 704-788-9497.
Sincerely,
Carolyn McFalls
Regional Compliance Supervisor
AquaSource
CC: Rusty Rommelle, MCWQP, 700 N. Tryon St. Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202
H. E. Mullis, White Forest Trust, 6116 Honeysuckle Lane, Charlotte, NC 28212
Glenn LaBrecque, AquaSource
Dustin Metreyeon, AquaSource

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 30, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL CM # 7001 2510 0005 0287 7845
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
White Forest WWTP
NPDES Permit. No. NC0063932
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Mullis:
On April 26, 2002, Mr. D. Will Autry of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part
of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water
Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because of violations of the
subject permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as detailed under the Permit
and Self -Monitoring Program headings. It is requested that a written response be submitted to
this Office by no later than June 17, 2002, addressing the violations and/or deficiencies noted
under the Permit, Self -Monitoring Program, Effluent/Receiving Waters, and Operations &
Maintenance headings of the Report. Please direct your response to Mr. Richard Bridgeman of
this Office. Additionally, please send a copy of this response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle of MCWQP
at 700 N. Tryon St, Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202.
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Mr. H. E. Mullis
Page Two
May 30, 2002
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at this office,
Enclosure
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCDEP
Gary Sherwood, AquaSource Utilities, Inc.
DWA
FILE: WQ 0063932.402

Transaction
N
US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
NC Division of Water Quality / Mooresville Regional Office NCDENR
Code
5
NPDES No.
NC0063932
A:°NationalDa
Yr/Mo/Day
02/04/26
iy
oding
AA
Inspection Type Inspector
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Duality
Inspection Work Days Facility Evaluation Rating
0.5
2
BI
N
QA
N
Form Approved.
OMB No.2040-0057
Approval Expires 8-31-98
Facility Type
Section JOs .Facility.
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
White Forest WWTP
8033 Hood Rd.
Mecklenburg County, NC
Name(s) of On -Site Representative(s)/Titie(s)/Phone No(s)/Fax No(s):
a
Entry Time: 10:50 am
April 26, 2002
Permit Effective Date:
January 1, 2001
Exit Time/Date: 1 1:40 am
April 26, 2002
Perry L. Smith / Operator in Responsible Charge. (ORC) / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Kevin Curl / Field Coordinator / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Dusty Metreyeon / Project Manager / AquaSource Utilities, Inc. [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Mr. H. E. Mullis
White Forest WWT Trust
6116 Honeysuckle Lane
Charlotte, NC 28212
1 Permit
1 Records/Reports
1 Facility Site Review
1 Effluent/Receiving Waters
S
Areas,evaluated During
1 Flow Measurement
1 Self -Monitoring Program
Compliance Schedules
1 Laboratory
Title: Owner
Phone No: [phone]
spectiott ( 6i+e k only thus
1 Operations & Maintenance
1 Sludge Handling/Disposal
Pretreatment
Storm Water
areas:e
uated)
Permit Expiration Date:
November 30, 2003
Contacted? Yes
Sewer Overflow
Pollution Prevention
Multimedia
Other:
See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary. All areas rated satisfactory unless otherwise noted.
Name(s) and Sign e(s) of Inspectors:
D. Will Autry
Signature of Management QA Reviewer:
Agency/Office/Telephone No:
MCWQP / [phone]
Agency/Office/Phone & Fax No:
Date:
May 16, 2002
Date:
Date:
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected by MCDEP on May 1, 2001. A Compliance Evaluation
Inspection Report/Notice of Violation was issued on May 23, 2001.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on January 1, 2001, and expires on November 30,
2003.
The existing 0.017 MGD facility is a package extended aeration wastewater treatment
plant with bar screen, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, aerobic digester, effluent tablet
chlorination, and chlorine contact tank. As a result of the permit modification dated August 15,
2001, the individual residential septic tanks are no longer listed as part of the wastewater
treatment facility description.
The aforementioned permit modification letter, dated August 15, 2001, noted that the
Division had still not received two analyses required by the permit. An Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) was due to the division by June 30, 2001, and a Flood Plain Analysis was due by
April 1, 2001, according to the permit. The permit modification letter issued a new deadline of
September 17, 2001 for both of these items. The failure to submit these documents by
September 17, 2001 constitutes two violations of the permit.
The Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) maintains a North Carolina Operators
Certification Grade II, which is acceptable for the class of the facility.
RATING: Unsatisfactory, relative to failure to submit required analyses.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period April 2001 through
February 2002. There were some problems noted that will be addressed under the Self -
Monitoring Program heading.
Records relative to self -monitoring, and instrument calibration are available upon request.
Visitation, maintenance, and process control records are kept in an on -site logbook.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
All of the existing components of the facility were in service and appeared to be operating
properly at the time of the inspection, except for Blower #1. The necessary check valve was on
order and expected to be installed soon.

FLOW MEASUREMENT:
The ORC estimates the flow based on effluent head at the v-notch weir. He is presently
using a yardstick to take this measurement. It is recommended that a permanently fixed staff
gauge be installed to ensure a more accurate reading.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by Precise Analytical, Inc., which is certified
by the State of North Carolina to perform analysis on all parameters specified in the permit.
Precise Analytical, Inc. was not evaluated during this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to Reedy Creek, which is a Class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. There did not appear to be any negative impacts on the receiving stream at the time
of the inspection; however, the effluent was unable to be clearly viewed because the outfall had
been buried in riprap due to some construction. It was requested that the ORC locate the outfall
and ensure that it was easily accessible.
RATING: Unsatisfactory
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period April 2001 through
February 2002. The reports indicate that the facility was in compliance with monitoring
frequencies and permit effluent limits at the times of monitoring during the review period, except
for the following:
2.
Effluent pH was not reported on a weekly basis for the week of November 18, 2001,
in violation of permit weekly monitoring requirement. This constitutes one (1) failure
to monitor effluent pH.
Effluent Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) was not reported on a twice -weekly basis for
the weeks of November 11, 2001 and April 29, 2001, in violation of permit twice -
weekly monitoring requirement. This constitutes two (2) failures to monitor effluent
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC).
Two (2) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) exceedances in violation of the monthly
average permit effluent limit were noted. These occurred during December 2001. A
civil penalty assessment (LV 02-145) dated May 14, 2002 included these two
violations. The case is still open.
4. Eight (8) samples analyzed for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) did not meet the
required 2.0 mg/L depletion. These occurred in April, June, July, August, and
October 2001, and January 2002.

SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM: (Continued)
5. One Ammonia -Nitrogen (NH3-N) sample is noted as being preserved to a pH of less
than 2 s.u. in the lab rather than in the field. This could result in a faulty result if
preservation did not occur within 24 hours of sample collection. This occurred on
January 22, 2002.
6. One (1) Downstream Fecal Coliform result was listed as 6.25 col/100mL on February
28, 2002. This parameter should be reported in whole units.
Under Facility Status on the reverse of the DMR's for May and November 2001, the
Compliant boxes are checked, even though there were failure to monitor violations during each
of these months. The failures to properly identify noncompliant on the DMR form constitute
violations.
The permit denotes the upstream sampling location as 100 feet above discharge, and
downstream location as 100 feet below the discharge. Permittee should ensure that samples are
being collected at these locations, or permit should be changed to reflect actual sampling
locations.
RATING: Unsatisfactory
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and grounds appeared to be properly operated and maintained, except for
minor sludge accumulation on some pipes and the bar screen. The current operating strategy for
the facility appears acceptable for its size and type.
RATING: Marginal
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL:
The aerobic digester is nearly empty. The ORC was unaware of the last need to waste
solids from the facility. If necessary, Piedmont Septic Service of Rowan County would be the
contractor used for this procedure.
SEWER OVERFLOW:
Please be advised that pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPDES permit, and North.
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 2B .0506 (a)(2), any failure of a collection system,
pumping station or treatment facility resulting in a bypass without treatment of all or any portion
of the wastewater shall be reported to the appropriate regional office (Mooresville Regional
Office 704-663-1699) as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours from the time the permittee
became aware of the bypass. Spills occurring on weekends or holidays can be reported by calling
the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management at 919-733-3300, 800-662-7956, or 800-

SEWER OVERFLOW: (Continued)
858-0368. A written report shall also be provided within five (5) days of the time of the incident.
The report shall contain a description of the bypass, and its cause; the period of the bypass,
including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it
is expected to continue; and steps taken (or planned) to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence
of the similar events. Any spill that reaches surface waters (i.e. any spill that reaches any water
already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc.) or any spill greater than 1,000 gallons on the
ground that does not reach surface waters must be reported.
An adequate spill response for those spills reaching surface waters should include an
evaluation downstream of the point at which the spill entered surface waters to determine if a fish
kill occurred. The evaluation should also include the collection of upstream dissolved oxygen
and pH measurements for background information and dissolved oxygen and pH measurements
at multiple points downstream of the entry point to document any negative impact. Failure to
report the bypass of collection system, pumping station or treatment facility subjects violators to
penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day per violation.