NCG510121_Complete File - Historical_20171231

*- �',' 'k" I
StC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No
To. Permits and Engineering Unit •
Water Quality Section
Attention. Dana Bolden
Date. January 5, 1994
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County. Mecklenburg
MRCS No.: -277
Permit No. NCG51011
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address. Rimtrax Corporation
1001 Reams Road
Charlotte, North Carolina''28213
. Date of Investigation: 01-04 94
. Report Prepared. By Samar Bou-lha ale, Env. Engineer I
4. Persona Contacted and Telephone Number. Mr. Jeff Baumgardner,
Exec. Vice President with Rimtrax Corporation; 704) 598-7900
. Directions to Rite. The Rimtrax Corporation is located on the
North side of WT. Harris Blvd. approx. 500 feet east of the
intersection of Hwy 21 and WT. Harris Blvd. in Northern
Mecklenburg County.
. Discharge Point(s) List for all discharge paints.
Latitude: 350 20' 211 Longitude: 800 50' 2311
Attach a .S.GS. reap extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge paint on map.
USGS Quad No.. F 15 SE USES Name. Derita, N.C.
7. Site size and expansion are consistent with:application?
Yes X No If No, explain.
S. Topography(relationship to flood plain included): Sloping
north toward an intermittent stream at the rate of 2 to 3.
The site is not located in a flood plain.
. Location of nearest duelling. None within 1.000feet of the
discharge point.
Pace Two
Interbsn Transfer,
Other:
If the application is not made complete within thirty (30) days, it will b. returned to you and may
Opportunity

.1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,, ent, health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury t • Raleigh, North Carolina27611
James G. Martin, Governor A ton Howard, Jr., PX
WilliamW. Cobey, Jr., i�irecctoi
iN NT Actirig
National Pollutaxit I?iscltar Eli °nation -Sy-stern
Application for Coverage under General Pertnit NC 1 ; Groundwater remediation project
designed ine to treat petroleum contaminated groundwater.
1. Name, Address, location, telephone number of facility requesting Permit.
A. Official Name: Rimtr x Corporation
B. ;Mailing Add 1 701 Reams Road
(1)Street Address,
(2)City; cliarlotte
(3)State; NorthCarolina'
(4)Zip; 2 21 3
()Cunt, Mecklenbzr
C. Location. (Attach map delineating general facility location)
(1)Street Address; 10701 Reams Road
(2)City; Charlotte
(3)State, North Carolina
(4)County, Mecklrsbur
D. Telephone N 7 0 4) S S -.0 21 1
. ` facility Contact:
A. Name; Baumgardner
" Title; Vice President
BCompany Name; Rimtrax Corporation
C. D. PhoneQ4} 5�7_t?.11
3. Application type (ch k appropriate selection)-
A. New or Proposed;
B. Existing; If previously permitted, provide permit number
i date - .
C. Modification;
the nature of the tion)-
4. Description of discharge
A. Please state the number of separate discharge points.
l'Ff ; 2,11; 3,[ I ; 4,[ ] [ I.
Page 1

a
B. Please describe the amount of wastewater being discharged per each separate discharge paint.
1. gallons per day ) 2:(gpd) 3 ) 4; )
C. Check the duration and frequency of the discharge, per each separate discharge point:
1. ntin X
2 mi ( do ):
. (check nth(s) s): J' 11; Bela t , ch [ ]; April [ 1,
y [ ],Tune I 1 July 11 August 11: September 11, 1: November t 1; DecemberI I.
. How many days per week is there a di rge?(check the days the discharge occurs)
Monday [4, Tuesday R W ay ], Thursday 11,Friday V-1, Saturday 1 , Sunday [ .
5. How much of the volume discharged is treated? (state in percent)L_00 %
D. 'be the type of wastewater being discharged per separate discharge point. Specify what is
being removed and products recovered. This includes a listing g of any chemicals foundin
detectableamounts with the maximum observed concentration reported. e summary of
analytical results containing this maximum value should also be submitted (.e. the listing, not
the graphical scan). The most recent sample must be no older than one year previous to the date
of this application. The'following volatile organic `compounds should be included along with
any suspected ted fuel additive;
1. Benzene*;
2. Toluene;
3. thylbenen*;
4. Xylene ;
5. Lead,
6. Methyl tent-btylether ( E),
7. Dibrom e (EDB);
8. 1,2-dichloroethane;
9. Isopropyl ether,
10. Naphthalene;
11. Phenol;
*(An EPA approved method capable of detection levels to 1 ppb should be used to detect these
compounds).
E. Please check the appropriate type of treatment being used to treat the groundwater;
1. Oil/Water Separator.
2. Air Strip
3 Diffused Aeration,
4.; Activated Carbon A rption
5. ' er(s )
. Separately, please describe in d ' (size, volumecapacity, design flow through treatment,
etc.) each type of treatment that was checked in 1 through 5. include, if any, the
manufacturer's information on each type of treatment. Also provide the removal efficiency of
each compound detected for the project, if known. rive design specifics (i.e. design volume of
each unit, materials used in air stripper, etc.).' Existing treatment facilities should be
described in detail and design criteria or operational data should be provlded(including
calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General Permit.
Please include model and calculations used in determining the design requirements for the air
stripper.
7. What are the well sizes and how many exist
8. Please state the pump sizes and their location in relation to the treatment used in part 2.E.
9. Please explain what fail-safe measures, such as audible and visual alarms or automatic
shutoff systems, are prodded to ensure no system failures.
10. is there an access to the effluent for sampling?( either an open pipe or a valve to obtain a
sample)
Page

NOT E: Construction of any wastewater treatment facilities require submission of three (3) sets of plans
and specifications along with their application. Design of treatment facilities must comply
with requirement 15A NCAC 2H .0138. if construction applies to the discharge, include the
three sets of plans and specifications with the application.
5. at is the nature of the business applying for this permit. heavy equipment dealer
6. Name of receiving water or waters; Dixon Branch Classification: C
(Attach a USGS topographical map with all discharge point(s) clearly marked)
7. Is the discharge directly to the receiving water?(Y,N)2'—
If no, state specifically the discharge point. Mark clearly the pathway to the potential receiving
waters on the site map. (This includes tracing the pathway of the storm sewer to its discharge
point, if a storm sewer is the only viable means of discharge.)
8. Please address possible non -discharge alternatives for the following options:
A. Connection to a Regional Sewer Collection System;
B. Subsurface Disposal;
C. Spray Irrigation;
9. 1 certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of
my'knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of nS' Jeff Baum ardner
Tjtie_yi-ce President, Rimtrax Corporation
Date Application 91ped
Signature of Applicant-
ND-91H-CARQLIXA-G2XUAL SIATIM'Edl
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any
application, record, report;plan or other document filed or required to be maintained under Article 21 or
regulations of the Environmental Management Co' fission implementing that Article, or who falsifies,
tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to
be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Conunission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a n-dsderneanor punishable by a fine not to
exceed $10,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides
a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a
similar offense.)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $400.00 made payable to the North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Mail three (3) copies of entire
package to:
Division of Environmental Management
NP)ES Permits Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, No Carolina 27626-0535
Page 3

NPDES PERMIT LIC ENGINEERING PROPOSAL
for
Rimtrax Corporation
Charlotte, North Carolina
MecklenburgCount
u --9- _._. _..__-I-_.-,_...a .._.,._ ,..-j
is per day.
the intermittent unnamed tributary of Dixon Branch shown in Figure 4,
4E.6- 0). Three sets of plans and specifications`for the treatment system,
which satisfy the requirements of items 41.6 through 41.1 , have been
submitted with this application.

). Four options for dIsposaI of waste water were considered for this
site: discharge to a sanitary sewer; discharge to an infiltration gallery;
discharge by spray irrigation; and discharge to the intermittent stream. The
outcome of the Investigation into the feasibility of each option is as
follows:
i
Sanitary sewer service Is not available at this site. An extension of
sanitary sewer service in the area is planned for completion around October,
1993.'Once the planned sewer extension is complete, the sewer service
nearest the;Rimtrax site will be approximately 2SOO feet away. For this
reason, the sanitary sewer has been eliminated as a discharge option.
The use of an infiltration gallery was investigated #or this site.
Infiltration is not feasible because after satisfying the buffer requirements'
is reason, an Infiltration gaIIery;has been eliminated as a dIschar
A
l'
f
« discharge « ,

-ni4rharatu to tho intar ittant Qtraarn
i creates the
. The R1mtrax Corporation is requesting that the flaw I m It set to the
PDES Permit be ten gallons per minute.
Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
Jo w Ile'...
Environmental Engineer
E
1/

r i^4urua ter... r _ r _ ..
' S stab <
MN
ti� C.
Goa F j,N351 -- 045/7,
}
1972
53 MILS
2 W S
*w�O?�4T AMS 4854 IV SE:
115 i SE —SERIES V842
,,. C
UTM GWO AND 1972. MXGNETIG NORTH � { ttF• .4 « x
GL':t�Ge&— In �
} -
den s ✓ t,
% 1}
`-
? ' A
}'�'
r ....-^'�,,,+, ✓" r 'i. t \\ 5 ��VV./ t, ram. V`,,.-,
�
i,:.
""'
6,00
ti l 02
9" SITE
am
841
tr
+KIWI! ..
IL
INIn k
2487
t _ 78 t tit
i
_ )
`l f!
if C, it A);
1 /{! 1i 0 1 7000 FEET
1u v ! l 1 1 5 0 1 KiLOMEFER
, ,_ t *• r_ _ CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
Rirntrax Corporation, 10701 Rea es Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
(R(7LTNIi�YTER ` ANACI�MN l tCIAT 11C. i ue 1

ea es load LOCATIONS
�LL
E
� 1
former locations of
�F MONITORING WELLS
------------- --------------------------
W4
E �
underground storage tanks
\ \ M
oa 1 MWJ l
° Rot
WI, '
1' 2
SEA
�.
150
* 0#°*
MW8 1
aaee MW'7
WSW f.1
LEGEND y
i l
building 6� monitoring well i Mw t 1
—' property line 1
1
intermittent stream
or surface drainage i�. t� MW11 �
ditch
1
storm drain North
F water —supply well l
l � �
:imtrax Corporation 00 200
Otte, Mecklenburg County i inch = 10 feet
undwater Management
Associates, ,Inc. Figure

LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED RECOVERY WELLS, MONITORING
Reames ReadWELLS, TREATMENT SYSTEM, AND DISCHARGE POINT
61
1 \
recov �ry lines
groundwater \
.;treatment \
system ! \
SEAL I?
15056
MCI N
\
point of discharge
to surface water { 1\
\ i 1
LEGEND
proposed recovery well .
} proposed monitoring well North1 i
!S� existing monitoring well
Y. tributary of_/'1
Dixon Branch \
Riintrax Corporation a 60 100 Boa
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
i inch = 100 feet
Groundwater Management
Associates, Inc. Figure 4

Area Availabte for
Wiltration
------ ------40
Cr
SEA .
`
1 •' t
t
10 feet from building - - -
�
�� ���
MW4
0 feet from propgrty line
!
! ! !
25 feet from surface drainage'
plume containing
{ .
only MTBE
MW
plume coat ping 88.0
BTEX MTBE ! ,
x f "' ✓ -
23
pp Q(tl
t !
l
100 feet fro
�
l�
water supply w 1
LEGEND-'
Area 'available for infiltration gallery
VI
�
1,I
Arrows indicate the direction of groundwater flow
assuming isotropic conditions.
l
* The water level in well Mw4 was not static.
MTBE methyl tert-butyl ether
11
B'TEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenene, and xylenes
4 monitoring well
_. �. property line
building
k
intermittent stream or
surface drainage ditch
�
._. W:, — storm sewer North.
water -supply well
1
Rimtrax Corporation
�
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
1 inch = 100 feet
Groundwater Management,
Associates, Inc. Figure

APPENDIX i
Chemical Test Results from Untreated
Groundwater at Ri trax Corporation
Charlotte. North Carolina

Table • Analytical Results of Groundwater Samples
Concentrations in micro rams er liter a / } or er billi�ln
NCtAC , Title 15A, Subchapter 2L, Groundwater Quality Standards appear in (},
where a cabs
Sample DATE Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylenes MTBE EDB IPE Naphtha-
Locatiton (10} (10b0} (29) (400} (50) (0.0005} lene*
t ,
I 17-Se 9I., .58tH1
I 18-Dee-91 < I < I < I < 1 I <1
2 I8-Dec 91 1340 2.2 17.5 30 6 880 ._` < I
I8-Dec 91 2370 = 32500 .... ..' . I900 .:.. ,. %200 .. ,:I3100 : < 1 24x0
4 18-Dec-91 <I <I <I < 1 I01 <I <1
MW
52 18-Dec-91 9020 " t} it}0 5 t0 :: 13 1O100 . < 1 <1 95
5 I -A ri1-92 5820 ' '7460 ' I230 ` 5240 .. 1430 < 1MW7 I39
44.7 :: <1 <1 < 1 =.94 6 . �`� : <1 <1
M W8 : 8-A ril-92 < I < I < I < I < I
MW9 9 683 13.0 797
9 I2-tv a -92 < 1 : 2.8 < 1 2.7 < I
MW I O I2-Ma -92 < 1 3.5 < I < 1 1.5
II I2 M -92 <I <:I <1 <I <I
I2 I2 a -92 <I <I <1 <1 <1
WSW 8-a r'r1-92 •k I < I < I < 1 3.8
WSW 6-Ma -92 I <1 <1 <1 <1 6.2
Note. Shaded areas indicate concentrations that exceed state standards.
rmonitorina well WSW = water -supply well located at Estes Trucking
Water sample W1 was also analyzed by EPA Methods 601 and 610. Naphthalene was the
only compound detected.
2'Water from monitoring well MW5 was also analyzed by EPA Methods 601 and 625.
Naphthalene was the only standard EPA Method 625 compound detected. The ten largest peaks
detected by EPA Method 625 were identified as follows: ethyl benzene, meta- and ara-x lenes,
ortho-ylenes, 1-methyl, 2-ethyl benzene, 1-methyl, -ethyl benzene; 1,,-trimeth:l benzene,
1 2,4-trimethyl benzene, 1,3,5-tri ethyl benzene, allylbenzen , and -methyl naphthalene. No
EPA Method 601 compounds were detected.

Chemical & Environmenta
IT
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ANC
c � �a n'c
a W A
SULTING SERVICE'S
A 1 °
a
k' s,
IN M. OGLE R 0. BOX 12288 a
IRMOENT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK N.C. 277 •;
PHONE {819 467-30968 - ,
FAx (19) :67-3
JOHN WISE August 6, 1991
IN7WATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
iHITE OAK TRAIL
>EL HILL, NC 2751
RMX
SAMPLE HISTORY
;13T ID CET SAMPLE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
it 1 7-17-91 7-18-91
i1 5134 —17—7-15-1
i2 51341 7-17-91 7-15-91
a3 51342 —17-91 7-18--91
i4' 1343 —17-91 7-1-91
SINCERELY,
TERRIE H. LIT ENBERG R
i-1RE
A

GAOUNDxWATE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. -- -
RM1
51339-43
August,' 6, 199 1
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CLIENT ID. S1
HYDROCARBON HIGH
'EXTRACTION DATE. 7-30--91
DETECTION DATE
PARAMETER METHOD LIMIT ANALYZED RESULT UNITS
HYDROCARBON, LOW 5030 0.01 --91 BDL MG/KG
HYDROCARBON, HIGH 3550 1.0 7-31-91 BDL MG/KG
CLIENT ID: SZ
HYDROCARBON HIGH
EXTRACTION DATE: "-30--91
DETECTION DATE
PARAMETER METHOD LIMIT ANALYIED RESULT UNITS
HYDROCARBON, LOW 5030 0.01 7-30-91 BDL MG/KG
HYDROCARBON, HIGH 350 1.0 7--31-1BDL MG/KG
CLIENT ID: S3
HYDROCARBON HIGH
EXTRACTION DATE: - 0- 91
DETECTION DATE
PARAMETER METHOD LIMIT ANALYZED RESULT UNITS
HYDROCARBON, LOW - 5030 0.01 7-30--91 BDL MG/KG
HYDROCARBON, HIGH 3550 1.0 8-01-91 BDL MG/KG
CLIENT ID; S4
HYDROCARBON HIGH
EXTRACTION DATE: 7-30--9
DETECTION DATE
PARAMETER METHOD LIMIT ANALYZED RESULT UNITS
HYDROCARBON, LOW 5030 0.01 7-30-91 0.46{1} MG/KG
HYDROCARBON, HIGH 3550 1.0 8-01-91 BDL MG/KG
1 -- HYDROCARBONS IDENTIFIED AS GASOLINE
BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMIT.
"GUIDELINE'S FOR REMEDIATION OF SOIL CONTAMINATED BYIU
T1,40.
, NCDEH R,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT`, APPEND , A
CERTIFIED BY: � r
LINK THROWER
5-06-91RE

<r
a
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENTy
ASSOCIATES, INC.
—3—
RM a
51;339-4 3
August 6, -1991
QUALITY CONTROL
INTERNAL STANDARD
HYDROCARBON
HYDROCARBON<
CLIENT ID
LOW
HIGH
H1
101.%
S2.:
117%
��7yy8�
8J %...
S3
112«
10%
S4-
121%
9%
INTERNAL STANDARD IS A
MEASURE OF THE EFFICIENCY OF
THE ANALYTICAL
PROCESS, AND IS DEPENDANT ON EACH INDIVIDUAL METHOD.
INTERNAL
STANDARDS ARE SELECTED
SO THAT THEY ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
COMPOUNDS OR GROUPS OF
COMPOUNDS BEING ANALYZED.
INTERNAL STANDARD :FOP. a
HYDROCARBON, LOW:
FLUOROBENZENE
HYDROCARBON, HIGH:
NAPHTHALENE
CERTIFIED BY. ll..
LINK THROWER
8-06--1RE

QROUNQWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC,
-4-
RM
51339-43
August 6, 1991
PURG'EABLE
HALOCARBONS
METHOD
601
CLIENT Ills W1
DATE ANALYZED.
-0-91 `
DETECTION
RESULT
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ugl1)
(u/1)
BROMODICHLOROETHANE
100
BDL
BROMO'ORM
100
BDL
BROMOMETHANE
1:00
BDL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
100
BDL
CHLOROBENENE
100
BDL
CHLORIETHANE
100
BDL
2-CHLOR0ETHYLVINYL ETHER
100
BDL
CHLOROFORM
100
BDL
CHLOROMETHANE
100
BDL
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
100 _`
BDL
DICHLORODIFLUO'ROMETHANE
100
BDL
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
i00
BDL
1, 2-DICHLO?ROETHANE
100
%BDL
1,1-DICHLt ROET ENE
100
BDL
TRANS--1, 2-DICHLOROETHENE
100
Bid
1;,-DICHLOROPROPANE
100
BDL
CIS-13-DICHLOROPROPENE
100
BDL
TRANS -I, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE
100
BDL
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
100
BDL
1,1,1 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
100
BDL"
TETRACHLOROETHENE
100
BDL
1,1, 1-TRICHLOR+OETHANE
1.00
BDL
1,1,2-TRICHLOR'OETHANE
100
BDL
TRICHEOROETHENE
100
BDL
TRICHLOROILUOROMETHANE
100
BDL'
VINYL CHLORIDE
100
BDL
INTERNAL STANDARDS
1-CHL0RO --BROMO-PROPANE
96
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 49, NO. 209,
OCTOB R 26, 1984
J - Indicates an estimated value.
This flag is used
when the mass
spectral data indicated the presence
of a compound that meets the
identification criteria but the result
is less than the spe .'lied
detection -limit.
Certified
By:
e
t
Lank Thrower
91RE

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES,
R
INC.
-5---
RMX
51339-43
August 6,;1991
PURGEABLE HALOCARBON -
METHOD 602
CLIENT ID: W1
DATE ANALYZED:
-0-91
DETECTION
RESULT
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ug/1)
(u tl)
BENZENE
100
5800
TOLUENE
1.00
13700
ETHYL BENZENE
1.00
172
CHLOR BENZENE
1.00
BDL
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.00
BDL
1, 3-DICHL ROBEN ENE
1.00
BDL
1, -D CHLOROBEN ENE
1.00
BD
XYLENES
100
9080
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
1.00
6810
INTERNAL STANDARDS
"LOUROBEN ENE
96 °,
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT"
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 49, NO. 209,
OCTOBER 26, ;1984
U - Indicates an estimated value.
This flag is used
when the mass
nt fication criteria but the result is less than the specified
,ection limit.
Certified By
LINK THROWER
�6- 1RE

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES, INC.
-6-
RMX
51339-43
August 6, 1991
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
METHOD 610
CLIENT ID: wl
DATE ANALYZED:
8-02-91
DETECTION
RESULT
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ug/1)
(Ug/1)
ACENAPHTHENE
10
BDL
ACENAPHTHYLENE
10
BDL
ANTHRACENE
10
BDL
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
10
BDL
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
10
BDL
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
10
BDL
BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE
10
BDL
BENZO(A)PYRENE
10
BDL
CHRYSENE
10
BDL
DIBENZO(A,B)ANTHRACENE
10
BDL
FLUORANTHENE
10
BDL
FLUORENE
10
BDL
IDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE
10
BDL
NAPHTHALENE
10
298
PHENANTHRENE
10
BDL
PYRENE
10
BDL
BDL - BELOW DETECTION
LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL.
49, NO. 209, OCTOBER 26, 1984
J - Indicates an estiTnAtAa
vAiiip- Thi 4x fl =rT i C-
u.Lji-eria vu-r, T-ne resuiL is iess Lnan tne specitied
tection limit.
4
Certified By:
LINK 'THROWER
a6-91RE

W
d f pgI N
Imo' � +� � "� '" 'y �'. .i� '� � .�o.�.�l V��►,�"
it
�.Ai" �r
�y
e'
•
"6
• •
.If
i
ry
r
-
MINION INN
MMINIMON
s �+►INN m
,� yw„� �I i � III MMWw uq N" W R Mlu � � NWY I IWI
{

ENVIRON`MEN
chnology, Inc.
ISUL.T1NG, SERVICES
iN M.CYCLE P. 0. BOX 1229
*RESIDENT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 27709
PHONE [phone]
FAX (919) 467- a1
January 1, 12
JOHN WISE
JNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
dHITE OAK TR.
PEL HILL, NC
27515
#174-1
SAMPLE HISTORY
CLjEjU ID
CET LE DATE SAMLED DATE RECEIVED
B1
55343 12-19-91 12-20-91
SB2
55344 12-19-91 12-20-91
CHEMICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 1
TERRIE H . LIT CER
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
7-92RE

)WAFER A A OC, _2
}1
44
fY 17, 19-9-2,
ANALYTICAL a
METALS
ILA• CB--'
12-20,-91
DETECTION N DATE
::TER 2HQQ LJL4IT ANALYZED USULT UNITS
7421 0. 1-07-92", 4.7 MG/KG
TEMBER, 198
-92RE

GROUNDWATER
MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
-3-"
#174-01
55343-44
JANUARY 17,
1992
TPH HIGH
METHOD 3550
DETECTION LIMIT: 1.0 MG
DATE DATE
CLIENT ID
EX-TRACTED ANALYZED
RE-SULT
ITG
BB-1
1-02-92 1-07-92
BDL
MG/KG
BB-2
1-02-92 1-03-92
BDL
MG/KG
TPH LOW
METHOD 5030
DETECTION LIMIT: 0.01 MG/KG
CLIENT ID
DATE ANALYZED
RKS-ULT
im-ITS
SB-1
12-30-91
2.70 (1)
MG/KG
BB-2
12-30-91
0.60 (1)
MG/KG
(1) HYDROCARBONS IDENTIFIED AS GASOLINE.
BDL = BELOW
DETECTION LIMIT.
VthNR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, APPENDIX F,
GUST, 1990.
REPORTED BY:
LINK THROWER
17-92RE

Chemical & Environmental Technology, c.
ETE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
JOHN M. OGLE P. Ot BOX 12298
PRESIDENT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 27709
PHONE (919) 48 r-3090
FAx (91 ) +7- 515
January 23, 1992
M , . P TE MONCLA
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
930 S RING ORK DR.
CARY, NC 27511
R: # 174-01
SAPLE HISTORY
CLIENT ID CET BAMPLE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
MW'-1 55345 2-18-91 12-2 - 1
MW-2 5534E 12-18-1 12-20-1
MW-3 5547 2-18--1 12-20-91
MW'-4 5584E 2-18-91 12-20-91
MW-5 549 2-18-91 1`-20--91
CHEMICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, GY, INC
�r
TERRIE H. LIT;NBERGER
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
1-23-92RE

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC. -2-
174-01
55345-49
JANUARY 23, 1992
PURGEABLE AROMATICS'
METHOD 602
DATE ANALYZED: 12-23-91
CLIENTID: MW 1
CET SAMPLE: 55345
DETECTION
PARAMETER LIMIT (ucg,lL) RESULTS (uglL )
BENZENE 1.0 BDL
TOLUENE 1.0 BDL
ETHYLRENZENE 1>0 BDL
CHLOROBENZ'ENE 1.0 BDL
1, 4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.0 BDL
1,--DICHLOROBENZENE 1.0 BDL
1,--DTCHL ROBENZENE 1.0 BDL
XYLENES 1.0 BDL
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1.0 1190
ISOPROPYL ETHER 1.0 BDL
ETHYLENE DIBRGMIDE 1.0 BDL
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBENZENE 98
BDL -- BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL.49, NO. 2 9, OCTOBER 26, 1984.
J - Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used when the mass
spectral data 'indicates the presence of a compound that meets the
identification criteria but the result is less than the specified
detection limit.
REPORTED B Y.__
EINK THROWER
1i-23-92RE

r
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
_ .
## ,74- 1
'.•
t
55+345-49
JANUARY 23, 1992
PURGEABLE
AROMATIC
METHOD 602
DATE ANALYZED: 1 -3-9
CLIENT; ID:
'MW-
CET SAMPLE: 5346
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMN (ug/L)
RESULTS (ug/L)
BENZENE
1.0
1340
TOLUENE
1.0
2.2
ETHYLBEN`ENE
1.0
17.5
CHLORt BEN ENE
1.0
BDL
1,4-DICHLOROBEN'ENE
1¢0
BDL
1,3-DICHLOROBEN ENE
1.0
BDL
1,2-DICHLOROBEN'ENE
1.0
BDL
KYLENES
1>0
30.6
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
1.0
8850
ISOPROPYL ETHER
1,0;
1580.
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
1.0
BDL
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBEN ENE
1 4
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, V L.49, NO. 209,
OCTOBER 26, 1984.
J- Indicates an e t , imated vAliiA�
T him f 1 i A
T.Ao% 4.1,
xt fication criteria but the result is le
action limit.
REPORTED BY:
�23-92RE
ss than the specified'
LINK 'THROWER

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
-4-
#174-01
55345-49
JANUARY 23, 1992
PURGEABLE
AROMATICS
METHOD 602
DATE ANALYZED: 12-23-91
CLIENT ID:
MW-3
CET SAMPLE: 55347
DILUTION FACTOR: 100
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ug/L)
RESULTS (ug/L)
BENZENE
100
23,700
TOLUENE
10
32,500
ETHYLBENZENE
100
2900
CHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
XYLENES
100
15,200
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
100
13,100
ISOPROPYL ETHER
100
2480
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
100
BDL
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBENZENE
154%
1-CHLORO,2-BROMO PROPANE
101%
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL.49, NO. 209,
OCTOBER 26, 1984.
J - Indicates an estimated value.
This flag is used
when the mass
itification criteria but the result is less than the specified
action limit.
REPORTED BYE
EINK THREWER
3-92RE

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
a
_5-
#174-01
55345--49
JANUARY 23, 1992
PUR EABLE
AROMATICS
METHOD 602
DATE ANALYZED: 12-2'3-91-
CLIENT ID.
MW-4
CET SAMPLE: 55348
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ug L)
RESULTS (ug/L)
BENZENE
1.0
BDL
TOLUENE
1.0
BDL
ETHYLBENZENE
1»0
BDL
CHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
1 4-DICHLOROBE ZENE
1.0
BDL
1, 3-D CHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
1,-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
LENES
1.0
BDL
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
1.0
11
ISOPROPYL ;ETHER
1.0
BDL
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
1.0
BDL
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUORGBENZENE
96 a
1-CHLORO, 2®BROMO PROPANE
95
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL.49, NO. 209,
OCTOBER 26, 1984.
J - Indicates an estimated value*
This flag is used
whenthe mass
.nti ication criteria but the
section limit.
REPORTED BY:
lass than the specifie
4
LINK THROWER
?3-92RE

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
#174-01
5345--4
JANUARY 23, 199
PURGEABLE
AROMATICS
METHOD 602
DATE ANALYZED:
:12-23-91
CLIENT ID:
MW-5
CET SAMPLE:
55349
DILUTION FACTOR:
100
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ug1L)
RESULTS (ug/L)
BENZENE
100 ;.
5020
TOLUENE
100
20,100
ETHYLBENZENE
100
2560
CHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
1 4--DICHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
13-DICHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
1,2--DICHLOROBEZENE
100
BDL
"YLENES
100
13,40
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
100
1,00
ISOPROPYL ETHER
100
BDL
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
100
BDL
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBEN ENE'
11 %
* NOTE: 7 UNIDENTIFIED PEAS DETECTED.
BDL -- BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VO:.49, NO. 2,
OCTOBER 26, 1984.
J - Indicates an estimated value.
This flag; is used
when the mass
spectral data indicates the presence of a compound that
meets the
identification criteria but the result is less than
the specified
detection limit.
REPORTED B 1
PORT Y.
LINE THROWER
E

x
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
#1 T4-01
55345-49 ,
JANUARY 23, 199
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
METHOD 601
DATE ANALYZED: 1-02-92
CLIENT ID: MW-
CET SAMPLE: 55349
DILUTION FACTOR: 100
DETECTION
PARAMETER LIMIT (ug1L) RESULT'S (ug/L)
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 100 BDL
BROMOPORM 100 BDL
BROMOMETHANE 100 BDL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 100 BDL.
CHLOROBENZENE 100 BDL
CHLOROETHANE 100 BDL
2a-CHLOROETHYLVNYL ETHER 100 BDL
CHLOROFORM 100 BIT
CHLOROMETHANE 100 BDL
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 100 BDL
DICHLORODI'LUOROMETHANE 100 BDL
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 100 BDL
1,-DICHLOROBENZENE 100 BDL
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 100 BDL
11-DICHLOROETHANE 100 BDL
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 100 BDL
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 100 BDL
TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHENE 100 BDL
12-DICHLOROPROPANE 10 BDL
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 100 BDL
" RANS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE 100 BDL
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 100 BDL
1 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROEtHANE 100 BDL
TETRACHLOROETHENE 100 BDL
1,1,1-'TRICHLOROETHANE 100 BDL
11,-iTRICHLOROETHANE 100 BDL
TRICHLOROETHENE 100 BDL
TRICHL'OROFLUOROMETHANE 100 BDL
VINYL CHLORIDE 100 BDL
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE 100 BDL
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
1-CHLORO, -BROMO PROPANE 106
NOTE': NO UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED.
BDL - 'BELOW DEFECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 49, NO. 209, OCTOBER 26, 1984
J - Indicates an estimated value. This 'flag is used wh n the data
indicates.the presence of a'compound that meets e id i;ZI,4on
criteria but the result: is less than the specif' d de c i�t.
REPORTED BY: "�
LINK THROWER

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
# 74-01
45-49
JANUARY 23-, 1992
BASE
NEUTRAL/ACIDS"
METHOD'25'
DATE
ANALYZED: 1-13-92
DATE
EXTRACTED: 12-30-91
CLIENT
ID: MW-5
PART A
BASE NEUTRAL
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMIT
RESULTS
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
ACENAPHTHENE
10.0
BDL
AENAPHTHY ENE
10.0
BDL
ATRACENE
10.0
BDL
BENZO(;A)ANTHRACENE--
10.0
BDL
BENZO('B)FLUORANTHENE
10.0
BDL
BENZO(i)FLUORANTHENE
10.0
BDL
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
10.0
BDL
BIS(2-CHLO'ROETHYL)ETHER
10.0
BDL
BIS(-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
10.0
BDL
BS(2-ETHLHEXL)PHTHALATE
10.0
BDL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROYL)ETHER
10.0
BDL
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10.0
BDL
BUTYL BENZ'YL PHTHALATE
10.0
BDL
2'--CHLORONAPHTHALENE
10.0
BDL
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10.0'
BILL
CHRYSENE
10.0
BDL
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
10.0
BDL
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE :,
10.0
BDL
1, 2-DICHLOROBENZENE
10.0
BDL
1 3-DICHLOROBENZENE
10.0'
BDL
1, 4-D CHLOROBE; ENE
10.0
BDL
3,3`-iICHLOROBENZIDINE
10.0
BDL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
10.0
BDL
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
10.0
BDL
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
10.0
BDL
2;,6--DINITROTOLUENE
10.0
BDL
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
10.0
BDL
FLUORANTHENE
10.0
BDL
FLUORENE
10.0
BDL
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
10.0
BDL
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
10.0
BDL
HEXACHLOROETHANE
10.0
BDL
IDENO(1,2,3-CD`)PYRENE
10.0
BDL
ISOPHORONE
10.0
BDL
2 METHYLNAPHTHALENE
10.0
BDL
NAPHTHALENE
10.0
295
NITROBENZENE
10..0
BDL
N-NITROSOI I-N-PROPYLAMINE
10.0
BDL
PHENANTHRENE
10.0
BDL
PYRENE
10.0
BDL
1;,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE:
10.0
BDL

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT:ASSOC.
-9-
174-01
55345-49
JANUAR' 23, 1992
RASE 'NEUtRA , ACIDS
METHOD'25
CLIENT ID: M-'
'CET SAMPLE- 55349
PART B
ACIDS
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMIT
RESULTS
(ug/1)
(ug l)
4-CHLORO- -M T YL'H:ENOL
10.0
BDL
2-CHLtROPHENOL
10.0
BDL
4-DICHLOROPHENOL
10.0
BDL
24-DIMETHYLPHENOL
10.0
BDL
4-DINITROPHENOL
50.0
BDL
2-METHYL-4;,6-DINITROPHENOL
50.0
BDL
2-NITROPHENOL
10.0
BDL
4.NITROPHENOL
50.0
BDL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
50.0
BDL
PHENOL
10.0
BDL
24,6TRICHLOROPHENOL
10.0
BDL
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED LIST QP PEAKS.
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
KEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 49, NO. 209, OCTOBER 26, 1984
J - Indicates an estimated value. This
flag is used when the mass
spectral data indicates the presence of
a compound that
meets the
identification criteria but the result
is less than the
specified;
detection limit.
REPORTED BY: _
3-91RE
THROWER

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC. -1 -
174-01 ti
55345-49
`ANUARY 23, 1992
LIBRARY SEARCH
CLIENT ID: MW-
TEN PEAKS IDENTIFIED AS
1) ETHYL BENZENE
2) m AND-p-XYLENE
3) o-XYLENE
) 1-METHYL-2-ETHYL BENZENE
5) 1-METHYL-3-ETHYL BENZENE
6) 1,,2,3-TRIMETHYL BENZENE
7) 1,2,4-TRIMETHYL BENZENE
8) 1,3,-TRIMETHYL BENZENE
) ALLYLBENZENE
10) 1-METHYL NAPHTHALENE
REPORTED BY
LINK THROWER
1--92RE

EIEChemical & EnvironmentalTechnology, Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
JOHN M. OGLE P. 0. BOX 1 298
PRESIDENT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 27709
PHONE (919) 467-:3090
April 13, 1 1 467- 3515
MR. PETE M1NCLA
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
0 S RINGFORK DR.
CARY, NC 27511
RE: # 17-46
SAMPLE HISTORY
CLIENT 'ID CET SAMPLE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
W-6 58264 4-01-2 4-03-92
W-7 58265 -1-2 4-03-92
CHEMICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, INC
ERIE H. LITENBERGER
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
4-13--92RE
EPE
4 t
y
I

t
OUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES,
INC.
- -
124-46
k264--6
'RIL 13, 1992 "
;PURGEABLE
AROMATICS
ME' HOD ",602
(MODIFIED)
DATE ANALYZED: --1392
CLIENT x ID :
MW-6
CET SAMPLE: 58264
.DILUTION FACTOR: 100
DETECTION
kRAMETER
LIMIT ('ug/L)
RESULTS (ug/L)
3NZENE
100
5820
)LUENE
100
7460
rHYLBENZENE
100
1230
iLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
100
BDL
,--DICHLOROBEN ERNE
100
BDL
,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
10
BDL
YLENES
100
6240
ETHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
100
1430
SOPROPYL ETHER
100
139
THYLENE DIBROMIDE
100
BDL
NTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY.
FLUOROBENZENE
106%
1-CHLORO,2-BROHO PROPANE
06
DL - BELOW <DETECTION LIMIT
EDERAL:REGISTER, VOL.51, NO 125,
JNE 30, 1986. '
- Indicates an estimated Value.
This flag is used
When the data
ndicates the Presence of a compound that meets the
identification
riter a but the result is less than the specified detection limit.
REPORTED BY- ;Z!4
LINK THROWER
4 -1 - RE

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES,
INC'.
-3_
174-46
58264-65
13, 1992
PURGEABLE
AROMATICS
METHOD 602
(MODIFIED)
DATE ` ANALYZED: 4-`13-92
CLIENT ID:
MW-
CET SAMPLE: 58265
DETECTION
PARAMETER
LIMIT (ug/L)
RESULTS ug/L)
BENZENE
1.0
44.7
TOLUENE
1.0
BDL'
ETHYLBENZENE
1.0
BDL
CHLOROBENZENE
1..0
BDL'
1,4-.DICHLOR BENZENE
1.0
BDL
1,3-DIC LOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
1,-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
XYLENES
1.0
BDL'
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER
1.0
94.6
ISOPROPYL ETHER
1.0
BDL'
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
1.0
BDL'
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBENZENE
103
1-CHLORG, 2-BROMO PROPANE
102%
L> - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
DERAL REGISTER., VOL.51, NO. 125, JUKE 30, 1956.
-+ Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used when the data
criteria but the result is less than the specified detection limit.
REPORTED BY
LINK THROWER
4-13-92RE-"

Chemical viron enta Technology, Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
JOHN`M. OGLE P. O. BOX 12298
PRESIDENT RESEARCH H TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 27709
PHONE [phone]
FAX (919) 46 - 515
April. '20, 1992
MR. PETE MONGLA
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
930 SPRINGFORK DR.
CAR"Y, NC 27511
RE% # 17 -1
SAMPLE HISTORY
CLIENT ID CET SAMPLE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
WSW 58464 4-08-9 4-09-92
MW8 58465 4-8-92 4-09-92
CHEMICAL & ]ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, INC
71
,r
_h
TERRIE H. LITZENBERG`
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
4-0-9'RE
v n
ci'

IDWATER MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES, INC.
-2-
&-1
k-65
20, 1992
PURGEABLE AROMATICS
METHOD 602 (MODIFIED)
DATE ANALYZED: 4-14-92
CLIENT ID: WSW
CET SAMPLE: 58464
DETECTION
METER
LIMIT (ug/L)
RESULTS (ug/L)
ENE
1.0
BDL
ENE =
1.0
BDL
LBENZENE
1.0
BDL
ROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
NES
1.0
BDL
YL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1.0
3.8
RNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
OROBENZENE
100%
- BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
ORAL REGISTER, VOL.51, NO. 125, JUNE 30, 1986.
Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used when the data
.cates the presence of a compound that meets the identification
A
REPORTED BY:
LINK THROWER
4-20-92RE

OUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES, INC.:
17-1
;464-65
"RIL 20, 1992
PURGEABLE AROMATICS
METHOD 602 (MODIFIED)
DATE ANALYZED: 4-1.4-9
CLIENT ID: MW5
GET SAMPLE. 58465
DETECTION
kRAME'TER
LIMIT (g/L)
RESULTS (t
NZENE
1.0
BDL
)LUENE
1.0
BDL
THYLBENZENE
1.0
BDL
iLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL'
,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL'
,B-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.0
BDL
YLENES,
1.0
BDL
ETHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1.0
BDL'
NTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBENZENE
99%
DL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
EDERAL REGISTER,, VOL.51, NO. 125, JUNE Sp, 1986.
- TnAratam An Af rnat d v luv_ This flaa is used when the d
.nd cates the presence of a compound that meets the identificat,
criteria but the result is less than the specified detection lim
REPORTED BY 0
LINK "THROWER
1-2O-92RE

Chemicalr tal Technology, Inc.
EVE
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
JOHN` M. OGLE
P. 0. BOX 12298
PREMDENT '
RESEARCH
TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 2 709
PHONE [phone]
FAX (91 ) 67-351
PORT OF ANALYSES
GROUNDWATER AG ASSOC.
PROJECT NAME. 174-01
10-E WOODWINDS IND. CT.
DATE:
05/19/92
CARY, NC 27511-
A : TULLY RYAN
# -01
SAMPLE NUMBER- 59510
S -
MW 9
DATE SAMPLED- 05/12/92
SAMPLER-
TULLY RY'
DATE RECEIVED- 05/13/92
TIME RECEIVED- 1545
DELIVERED Y- DEBORAH MONCLA
RECEIVED
Y- SSB
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
TIME BY
RESULT UNITS
PURGEABLE AROMATIC EPA 602
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
BENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
CHLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 u/1
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
EPA 602"
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1 ;
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
0/14/2
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
ETHYLBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
c1.0 g/1
TOLUENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
2.8 ug/1
TOTALE
EPA 602'
05/14/92
ALT
2.7 u/1
SURROGATE : FLUOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
106 PERCENT
T RT-BUT ,E
EPA 602
0/1/
T
<1.0 ug/1
PLEASE NOTE EPA METHOD 602 WAS MODIFIED
TO INCLUDE
MTBE.
ALL ANALYSES PER FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 51, NO.
125,
JUNE 30, 1956.
OR

I Chemical & Environmental Technology, Inc.
it ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
1. OGLE
R 0. B©
CENT
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK N. C
PHONE (919) 46
FAX (91 ) 4(
PORT OF ANALYSES
ER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
PROJECT NAME: 174-01
OWINDS IND. CT
DATE:
05/19/92
27511—
I,Y RYAN
RR- 59511
SAMPLE ID—
MW 10
'LED— 05/1 /92
SAMPLER—
TULLY RYAN
M D— 05/13/92!
TIME RECEIVED- 1545
E BY- DEBORAH MONCLA
RECEIVEDBY
' SSB
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
TIME BY
RESULT UNITS
4AROMATIC EPA 602
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1a0 ug/1
IZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
1.0 ug/1
DROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
A)ROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 g/1
�OROBENZENE
EPA 602:
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
XNE
EPA 62
05/14/92
ALT
<1a0 ug/1
EPA 602"
05/14/92
ALT
3.5 ug/1
XNES
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
1 x ELUOROB N E
;CPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
104: PERCENT
ff—BUTYLETHER
;EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
1.5 ug/1
)TE EPA METHOD 602 WAS MODIFIED
TO INCLUDE
MTBE.
ZES AS PER FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 51, NO.
125,
30, 1986.
LABORATORY i? R
WE
mot,
0
tr

Chemical vir m e to Technology, Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
M. OGLE
P. 0. BOX 12298
RESIDENT
RESEARCH "TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 27709
PHONE [phone]©
FAX (91 ) 467-3515
PORT - OF ANALYSES
WER MANAGEMENTASSOC.
PROJECT NAME: 174-01
lOODWINDS IND. CT.
DATE:
05/19/92
X 27511—
rULLY RYAN
NUMBER- 59512
SAMPLE ID—
MW 11
qeLED— 05//92
SAMPLER—
TULLY RYAN
XE D— 05/13/92
TIM RECEIVED— 1545
D Y-- DEBORAH MONCLA
RECEIVED Y— SSB
I of
ANALYSIS
rs
METHOD
DATE
TIME BY
RESULT UNITS
BLE AROMATIC EPA 602
EPA 602
5/14/2
ALT
s
EPA, 602
05/14/2
ALT
<1. ug/1
3ENZENE
EPA 602s
05/14/92
ALT
e1.0 g/1
.HLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 /1
:HLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1. ug/1
CHLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
1.0 ug/1
ENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 g/1
Pi
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
XYLENES _
EPA 602
0/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
ATE a FLUOROBENZE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
102 PERCENT
rERT-BUTYLETHER
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
NOTE EPA METHOD 602 WAS MODIFIED
TO INCLUDE
MTBE.
ALYSES AS PER FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 51, NO.
125,
JUNE 30 1986.
,
LABORATORY DIRECTORt,'�� 421;�CYA�

Chemical yrInc.
`EE
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTING SERVICES
6HN M. OGLE P. O. BOX 1 298
PRESIDENT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 27709
PHONE [phone]
FaX [phone]
PORT OF ANALYSES
R MANAGEMENT ASSOC. PROJECT NAME: 174-01
WINDS IND. CT. DATE: 05/19/92
°7511—
Z RY'
1B — 59513
S 12
aE'.ED— 05/12/92
SAMPLER—
TULLY RY `
.VED— 05/13/92
TIME RECEIVED— 1545
BY- DEBORAH MONCLARECEIVED
BY— SSB
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
TIME BY
RESULT UNITS
AROMATIC EPA 602
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
EPA 62
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 g/1
7,ENE
EPA 602
5/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
)ROBENZENE
EPA 602
0/14/
T
<1.0 u/1
)ROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
1.0 ug/1
)ROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
T
<1.0 /1
3NE
EPA. 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 /1
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
ENES
EPA 602
05/14/2
ALT
<1.0 /1
: FLUOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/14/92
ALT
105 PERCENT'
r—BUTYLETHER
EPA 62
05/14/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
ICE EPA METHOD 602 WAS MODIFIED TO INCLUDE MTBE.
ES AS PER FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 51, NO. 125,
Tm 30, 1986.
L

Chemical & Environmental Techn
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULI
ology, Inc.
ING SERVICES
ICI M. OGLE
R 0. B®
RESIDENT
RESEARCH TRIANGLE BARK N.
PHONE {i9) 4
FAX (t9) 4
April 22, 1992
PETE MONCLA
UNDWATER MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES, INC'.
SPRING ORE DR.
.Y, NC27511
1 -1
SAMPLE HISTORY
CLIENT :Lit
CET SAMPLE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEI
MW-9
55521 4- 9-92' 4-10-92
CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ;TECHN I
TERRIE H. LIT ENBERGER
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
2-9RE
#gaNOPv¢Np�r
a f
o
0

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. --
174-1
58521
APRIL 22 1992
PURGEABLE AROMATICS
METHOD 60 (MODIFIED)
DATE ANALYZED': --1-2
CLIENT ID: MW--
CET SAMPLE: 58521
DETECTION
PARAMETER LIMIT (ug/L) RESULTS (ug1Li)
BENZENE 1.0 26.6
TOLUENE 1.0 68.3
ETHYLBENZENE° 1.0 13.
CHLOROBENZENE 1.0 BDL
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.0 BDL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.0 BDL'
1,2--DICHLOROBENZENE 1.0 BDL
XYLENES 1.0 7.
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1.0 52.7
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
FLUOROBENZENE 100%
BDL'- BLOW DETECTION LIMIT
FEDERAL REGISTER, 'VOL.51 NO, 125, JUNE 30, 1986.
d - Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used when the data
indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification
criteria but the result is less than the specified detection limit.
REPORTED BY {
LINK THR6WER
4-2-92RE

ENVIRONMENTALO,
rental Technology,, Inc.
1Y AND O ULTING SERVICES
JOHN M. OGLE
P. fJ. BOX 12298
PRESIDENT
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N. C. 2 709
PHONE [phone]
REPORT OF ANALYSES
FAX [phone]
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
PROJECT
NAME:
174-01
I01-E'WOODWINDS IND. CT.
DATE:
05/13/92
ARY, NC 27511-
YOUR REF/P.O.:
#` 174-01
Attn:'TULLY RYAN
1" 4-01
SAMPLE NUMBER- 59323
SAMPLE ID-
WSW
DATE SAMPLED- 05/06/92 TIME
SAMPLED- 1600 SAMPLER-
TULLY RYAN
DATE RECEIVED- 05/08/92
TIME RECEIVED-
0938
DELIVERED Y- TULLY RYAN
RECEIVED
Y- S B
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
TIME BY
RESULT UNITS
PURGEABLE AROMATIC EPA 602
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
BENZENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
CHLOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1.0 a/1
1,8--D CHLORDBEN ENE
EPA 602
05/08/93
ALT
<1.0 ug 1
,3DICHLOROBENENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1,0 ug1
1,4-DICHLOROBEN ENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
ETHYLBENZENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1.0 ug 1
TOLUENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
TOTAL'XYL.ENES
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
<1.0 ug/1
SURROGATE FLUOROBENZENE
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
106 PERCENT
ETHYL.TERT-BUTYLsETHER
EPA 602
05/08/92
ALT
6*2 g 1
ALL ANALYSES AS PER FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 51, NO.'125,
3UNE 30, 1986.
LABORATORY
DIRECTOR
-`