NC0046892_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

August 21, 2018 -
r. es Bell 5 �. ��
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 2811
Mr. Rusty Roelle
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Control Program (MCWQP)
2145 Suttle Avenue
Charlotte, NC 2828
Re N DEa Inspection
Motiva Enterprises LLC
Charlotte South Terminal -- NPD S Permit No. NCO046892
Charlotte North Terminal — NPDEB Permit No. NCO 2218
Dear Sir:
On July 11, 2018, Chad Broadway of MCWQP conducted a NPDS inspection of the Motiv
Enterprises LLC Charlotte north and South Terminals. During the inspection, Mr. Broadway
noted an issue with secondary containment at the South Terminal and a monitoring well at the
North Terminal. NCDEQ requested a written response by August 24, 2018 explaining how the
two issues will be resolved; A summary of the issues and Motiva's resolution is provided below.
Containment at Charlotte South:
Inspection Note:
The secondary containment dike for the oil -water separator holding tanks was observed to have
two significant areas of separation, and ether minor cracks and separations, This condition was
also noted during inspections conducted in 2015 and 2016, and displacement of the concrete
blocks appears to have increased since the previous inspections, Although there was no
evidence of a discharge from the containment wall, the structure should be properly repaired to
ensure adequate secondary containment is provided. Please be advised that the subject permit
requires the per ittee to properly operate and maintain the facility at all tunes 'Permit
Reference. Part ll, Section C (2) Proper Operation and Maintenance.
Pv ot6,a Enterprises LLC;
4101tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, NC` 2 +2ld

PAT MCC ORY
s (3ommor
ws
DONAL1 R. � V t T
Water Pesources S, JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Dircelor:
September 1, 201
. Scott billing, Complex Manager
Mtia Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises/Charlotte South Terminal
NPDES :Permit No. NCO046892
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. L illing
On August 16, 2016, Mr. Chad Broadway of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(M WQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Resources
(I ). Please inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) of our findings by
forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
It was noted during the inspection that the designated C1RC; and Backup ORC had invalid
wastewater operator licenses due to the failures to pay the 2016 annual fees. Although the fees were paid
on August 24, 2016, the facility did not comply with the permit's requirements from January through
August 23, 2016 due to the facility not having an ORC and Backup ORC with valid wastewater licenses.
Please be "advised that any future failures to maintain an ORC and Backup ORC with valid wastewater
licenses can subject the permittee to the issuance of a Notice of Violation.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes
Bell/Mooresville Regional Office/D at [phone] and/or Mr. Broadway at [phone], or
via email at wes.bellt'�`)a,ncdenr. ov and chad.broadwa mecklenbur court c. ov.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger.,
Water Quality Regi
Division of Water I
Enclosure.
Inspection. Report
cc Rusty Rozzelle, MCW P MSC;-161
WB
�egional Supervisor
It
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality I Water Resources �
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 }
704 663 1699
titer Quality Regional operations
aoresville, North Carolina 28115

FF
United States Environmentat Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Mahington, D..2Wrt
C7MS No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8- 1-98
Section A. National Data System Coding (i.., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrtmotday Inspection Type Inspector Fee Type
Itj 2 Li3 1 NCO046892 ill 12 16t08ti6 17 181 191 . 1 0�
21 ....J
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 tA----•----.-�..__.-- .Reserved_..__,....,
87 1.0 �....� 70 Ej 71 U 72 : 73 Ljj74 7580
Section 8: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to PO W, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number) 03:40PM 16108116 15/09101
Charlotte South Terminal #058503
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
6851 Freedom Or
Charlotte NC 28214 04: 5PM 16/08/16 20 130
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)fTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
tit
Michael Wayne mithfORC/704-399-301t
Name, Address of Responsible cialfritletPhone and Fax Number
Contacted
Scott Dilling;410 Tom Sadler Rd Charlotte NC 28214tComplex 11anagert704-399.33011
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit ■ Flaw Measurement Operations & Maintenance RecordStRepOrtS
® Self -Monitoring Program N Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D:' Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Grate
Water Quality Program Meckenburg County MRO t704- 36-5449t
Signature of Management 0 A Reviewer Agency/OflicWhone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger MRO Q//704- 21 4/
EPA Form 3 60- (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. d
Page# 1

R Rl
good condition at the time of inspection.
c

Pe it
C S 1 /{ u. A w E
(if the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
©
M
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
11
❑
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
❑
S
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
M"
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
M
❑
11
❑
Comment: The facility's current riermit became effective on 911/201 and g?MirM on ffl=Q2Q. The
last ins a tion of this facilh was conducted bj the LANkIgnburg Coup
Water Qugllily
lies ram on 8/18/2015..
The facilily no longer operates ggLji2mgnj listed in the permij as tLeing associated with
roundwater r mediation activities includingthe oil 1 water se arator carbon filters and air
§trigger..An airs ar in s stem or in-s'tu air styepggr, has b en installed since the reviou
inspection and is currently active for ' round water remedi tion efforts.
ther elements of
the facility are consistent with the descri ti n in the gftrmit. Cie char a from the facili
includes `sto water that accumulates within the tank containment mike and surrounding
areas.
Record Keepwincf
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
a
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg required 5 years)?
N
0
11
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
M
❑
11
0
Is the chain-of-custodycomplete?
❑
❑
0
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRscomplete: do they include all permit parameters?
©
[
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
110
■
E]
(If the facility is = or > 5 M D permitted flow) Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator
Q
0
■
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
©
11
Q
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
®
a
p
11
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
Q
❑
Page#

QpeLati2ns A Malntenan a
XM N2 NA NE
Is the punt generally cyan with acceptable housekeeping?
® 0
❑
0
Does the facility analyze process ntrol parameters, for ex. MLSS, M RT, Settleable
0000
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and ether that are applicable?
Comment: The facile utilizes an oil l water se arator for treatment of loading rack water, which is then
discharged to two figiding tanks. Contents of the holding tanks are removed by
an STAT
Environmental Services for offsite treatment and disposal. Facile emo-nn 1 ins ect the oil /
water se arator weekly for levels and maintenance needs. The f cil` C FTC states that the
contents of the oil 1 water sel2grator and holding tanks are removed (wire: Per
Mr.
Please refer to the "Summary" Section for additional comments.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes- No NA NE
Is flaw meter used for reporting?
M 0
0
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
U000
Is the flow meter operational?
M000
(if units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flour meter`?
0 0
■
Comment: A " S arlin it line fl€ w meter, located at outfall #QO1 is used to measure flow from the
facility. The flow meter was last calibrated on 1/20/2016 by Sparling Instruments.
Effluent Pige
Yes t o NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
a ®
11
1:1
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
© 0
Comment: The facilitt was not discharging at the time of inspection. No visual si ns of pollution
wgre
observed below the outfall.
Pa

PAT MCCRORY
�: rr7i?d f1ikR'-
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART"
cx
Water Re ource S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL OVAUTY
June 24, 2016
1, ,@
r a
Scott Dilling
Motiva Enterprises LLC
410 Tom Sadler R
w w
Charlotte, NC 28214
Subject: NPDES Electronic Reporting Requirements
Charlotte South Terminal ##0503
NPDES Permit Number: NCO46802
Dear NPDES Permittee:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule. The rule requires NPDES regulated facilities to
report information electronically, instead of filing written paper reports. The rule does not change what
information is required from facilities. It only changes the method by which information is provided (.e.,
electronic rather than paper -based).
EPA is phasing in the requirements of the rule over a 5-year period. The two phases of the rule, and their
key milestones, are:
• Phase 1—Starting can December 21, 2016, regulated entities that are required to submit Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DRs) will begin submitting these reports electronically. if you are currently
reporting your DR data electronically using eDMR then you simply need to continue reporting
in the same way as you are now. The key change is that, starting on December'21, 2016,
electronic reporting of DMRs will be required, instead of voluntary.
• Phase 2 —Starting can December 21, 020, regulated entities that are required to submit certain
other NPDES reports will begin submitting these reports electronically. Reports covered in the
second phase include Notices of intent to discharge in compliance with an NPDES general permit,
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports, and a number of other NPDES program reports.
Incorporating Electronic Reporting Requirements into NPDES Permits
The NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule requires authorized NPDES programs to incorporate electronic
reporting requirements into NPDES permits beginning December 21, 2015. Under the new rule, the
electronic reporting process supersedes the paper reporting process. According to our files, your NPDES
permit became effective after November 2013, and should contain the requirement to electronically
report your Discharge Monitoring Reports using NC DWR's eDMR system.
In addition to requiring permittees to report information electronically, the rule also requires permittees
to identify the initial recipient for the NPDES electronic reporting data [see 40 CFR 122.41(l)( )]. Initial
State oiNotth Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center , Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

determine the initial recipient of your electronic submission.
NC DWR has submitted a request to EPA to be the initial recipient for the following NPDES data groups:
1. Discharge Monitoring Reports;
2. General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (N ls); Notices of Termination (MOTs)];
3. Pretreatment Program Reports; and
4. Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports
EP's web site will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for each type of electronic
submission for each stag. Instructions on how to access and use the appropriate electronic reporting
tool will be available as well.
For more information on EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, visit
htt www2.e a ov ccm lianee final -national- ollutant-clischar e-elimination-s stem-n electron For ortin -rule'. For more information on electronic reporting to NC DWR, visit
htt de nc. ov` about' divisions water-resoiurces edmr noes -electronic -re cartin or contact Vaness
Manuel at 919-807-6392 or via email at Vanessa ManuelCa ncdenr ov.
Sincerely,
je,Hre0. F'
,for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Cc: NPDES File
Central Files

.015
September II , 2015
Ito
MOORF-SVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Wastewater Brandt
"Water Quality Permitting Section
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Centel
Raleigh, NC, 27699-117
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority
OTI A ENTERPRISES LLC CHARLOTTE SOUTH 'l EI Ii AIt
PS Permit Number NCO046892
To bout It May Concerti..:
By notice of this letter, I hereby delegate signatory authority to each of the following individuals for all
permit applications, discharge Monitoring reports, and other information relating to the operations at
the 'subject facility as required by all applicable federal, state, and local environmental agencies
specifically with the requirements for signatory authority as specified in 15A NCAC 2B.0506.
Individual i#1 Individual #2 ffapplicable)
Name: Joseph Gon-nari Colin Parker
Title; Terminal Superintendent Operations Coordinator
410 Tom Sadler Rd 410 Toni Sadler I2d
Mailing Address; CCharlotte, Ne 214Charlotte, Nc °�821.
Physical Address: 6851 Freedom Drive 6851 Freedom Drive
(if different) Charlotte, 'c 28214 Charlotte, Ne 28214
Email Address: [e-mail]�n [e-mail]
Office Phone: 740 - 39 - 3301 _ 740 - 399 - 3301
Mobile Phone: 72 - 570 - 0670 980- 333 - 1464
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at
d.dillizig riiotiv etit.coi or 704-399-3301.
Sincerely,
a
Scott S. Difling
Complex Manager
410 Tom Sadler Road, Charlotte, Nc 28214
[e-mail]
704- 99-3301
704-204-79
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Pei a itting Section

MOTIVA
ENTERPRISES LLC
VIA UPS No. `1 ZVT95880295944302 SEP 15 2015
Eeptember.l4, 2015 0RESVILL PA DEFINE
r. Wes Bell
NCDENR Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water (duality
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville; NC 2811
RE. Notice of Deficiency: NOD-2015-PC-0210
NPDES Permit No. NCO0468 2
Motiva Enterprise LLC — Charlotte South Terminal
6851 Freedom Drive, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Bell:
In response to Notice of Deficiency NOD-2015-PC-2 10, Motiva Enterprises LLC (Motiva) i
providing the following information regarding the August 18, 2015 inspection of the Motiva Charlotte
South Terminal b ; Mr. Chad Broadway of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program. The
findings of the inspection: have been discussed with the primary Operator in Responsible Charge
(CRC), Michael Smith, and the back-up CRC, Colin Parker.
The CRCs have reviewed: their sample collection and handling procedures. The laboratories used by
Motiva provide sampling kits with prepared bottles so in the past the preservatives where not listed on
the chain -of -custody forms (CoC). Going forward the method of preservation will be documented on
the CoC. Motiva maintains a dedicated refrigerator for temporary storage of water samples and all
samples will be transported in coolers with ice so they arrive at the laboratory at the proper
temperature.
Should you have any questions about the information provided, please contact Colin Parker,
Operations Coordinator, at 704-399-1904 or email Colin.Parker0),Mot vaent:coin.
410 Tom Saddler Road Charlotte, NC 28214 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

FPage72-:: NOD-2015-PC-0210
MotivaEnterprises LLC -- Charlotte South Tenninal
Also, please note that beginning September 15, 2015, Scott Filling will assume the role of Complex
Manager the Motiva Enterprises LLC Carolinas Complex and any future correspondence regarding
NPF1 xS Permits NCO046892 or NCO022187 should be directed to him at 410 Torn' Sadler Road,
Charlotte, NC" 28214.
Very truly yours,
MOT[ ENTERPRISES LLC
James W. Ling
Complex Manager
cc: R. Rozzelle, MCWC P
S. Filling, Motiva
T. Bothwell Motiva
File No. ENV 20-01

FiLE
Axpa
C&OR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secrete
August 31, 2015
Mr. James W. Lintz, Complex Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Read
Charlotte, NC 28214
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LL.CICharlotte South Terminal
NPDES Kermit NCO046892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Tacking : NO-2015-PC-0 '10
Dear Mr. Lintz:
n August 18, 2015, Mr. Chad Broadway of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP)
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part sf a cooperative working
agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Resources (DWR): Please ensure that a
copy of the enclosed inspection report is forwarded to the facility'sOperator-in-Responsible-Charge(QRC).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by September 22 2015 detailing the
actions taken to ensure that effluent samples are being properly preserved as discussed further in the Laboratory
Section of the attached report. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Mr. Wes Bell,
Mooresville Regional Of ice/DWR. Additionally, please send a copy of your response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle of
MCWQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28202.
The inspection report should be self. -explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
the report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at (7 4) 235-2192 sndlor Mr. Broadway at [phone], or
at wes.be!!@ngqgnLMy and had.broadwa mecklenbur count nc. cv.
Sincerely,
t
/Michlael�L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Equality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, DENR
Enclosure;
Inspection Report
cc. MSC 1617 Central files basement
Rusty Rozzell, MCWQP
WB
Mwresvifie Regional Office
iacatiow 610 East Center Ave., wits 301 Mooresville, NC 2611
Phone: (744) 6-"16991 Fax: [phone] k Customer Service: 1-877-6 3-6746
lntem tr http.1/porttil,ncdenr,org/web/wq
An rtt .i 6lnnnr+u ft,; Afilnrrafk- A,,fim P mnlnvAr f)0 rlacunle dmflpl P—q €:riYtClffrc ono , ...

y United Stags Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
E1'"" Washington, D,G.2 tt OMB No, 2040-005
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmotday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
N j 2 U 3 NCO046892 � 11 12 15/08/18 {17 18 LCJ 19 1 e 1 20LJ
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA-«--.---Reserved.------. ---
7 1.o 702 1 71 N 1 72 1 N 1 731 1 17475 tJ
Section S: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Trine/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPOES permit Number) 10:OOAM 15/08118 11/03/01
Charlotte South Terminal
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiation Date
651 Freedom Dr
12:30PM 15/08118 15106130
Paw Creek NC 28130
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)tTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Numbers) Other Facility Data
dll
Colin V Parker//}
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone, and Fax Number
Contacted
James W Lintz,410 Tom Sadler Rd Charlotte NC 282141Complex
No
Managerf704a399-3301/7043948988
Section C. Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit In Flow measurement Operations & Maintenancf RecordslReports
Self -monitoring Program 11 Facility Site Review EftluentfRec iving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary
Namets) and Signature(s) of inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Water Quality Program Meckenburg County MRQ WQ11704- 36-54491
Signature of Management Q Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wes Bel! ,� MRfl Q11704-63-19t.1'
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NCO046892 111 121 15/08,18 17 18
Section D: Summary of Findina/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessarv)
Page# 2

Permit. N O 46892 Owner - Faoliityc Charlotte South Terminal
Inspection Date.- 08/18/201 a Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
zert it Yes No NA N
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the perrnittee submitted a new IN ❑ 110
application`?
Is the facility as described in the permit? 11 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? M ❑ ❑ 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ 1 ❑
Comment: The fagilily is currently g2erating under the Drevious permit that expired on 6/30/2015. 'The
facilily apglied for permit renewal on December 19 2014 and has -recently been issueda,
new permit version that becomes effective can 9/1/2015. The last iris ection of this Lagilily
was conducted by the M cklenburg County later Quality Program on Janus 5 2012.
^Y7..., ... 9,,..,.....,.., :........... ,,:.....«....w:..w.r.r.4 I-4—A ;— 4,"- .a,nrm4 — hndnn ne+:e.nr+e+ 4riri %.110,
11-011-11. WIT. IR11 - M.R.
WIMIMilUE ink
R2oord Keeping
Yes No NA -N
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. re, required 5 years)?
0
0
0
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
a
❑
❑
13
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
11
❑
❑
❑
Grates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Gates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are i7MRS complete: do they include all permit parameters?
0
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
❑
(if the facility is = or > 5 Mt3Q permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
©
❑
IN
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
11
©
❑
❑
Is the ORQ certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
11
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
a
❑
11
❑
Is a copy of the current NPD S permit available on site?
11
❑
❑
❑
Page#
3

Permit: NCO046892 Owner. Facility, Charlotte South Terminal
inspection Date* 08/1812015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
]VOLZI� GO :11•••Elmo=$
R 'MOM E
M90 MIMW• t• 1=41 M
MR
Wd MM
MIME=-
Laboratont yell
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
LO NA NE
and
t the
L
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees El 0 1
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0,2 degrees? D
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? 11 0 1
Comment: The facili!y has contracted with Prism Laboratoriescertification #402, to conduct
gnalysis of all permit pammeters e&cept aguLe, oxicibL which is conducted by ETT
Environmental, NC certification #022. Within the last year, the Lacifily has also used Test
America and Pace AnalAtgal Services for anal is. Preg2rvat-ivgra Agecifig to the analysig
being conducted are not §2ecified on the chain-of-guLtody. It is recommended that the
facifily wegh Lht I2Le§§0Lajtyg used with each collected jam _m21g,
Several chain -of custody forms indicate that sam2les are not delivered to the lab on ice, and
lab corresoondence, in October 2014 spgcifiolly details that saml2l@§ MLe delivered outside
of the acre table tempeLatureran 11 effluent Sam must be
ge. Please be advised that a e J2 pigs a_
properly preserved fincluding being stored and shipped on ice according to 40 QFR 1363,
Table 11.
Effluent SjM2�fin A Yes No N
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 1:1 0 1
Is sample collected below all treatment units? 11 D I
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean? 11 El I
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
pagf

Permit: NCO046892 Owner - Facility. Charlotte South Terminal
Inspection Crate. 08/18/201 Inspection Type. Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampiing
Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
11 13
El
El
representative)?
Comment: The permit re wires grab samples for all re aired parameters. The facility is conductin
analytical monitorino for all parameters at the frgguency stated in the Dermit,
C) eraticans & Maintenince
Yes No NA 1NI
Is the plant generallyclean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
❑ 0
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facilitv utilizes an oil I water separator for treatment of loadin ' rack water, which is then
discharcied to two holding tanks. Contents eaf the holding tanks are removed by
an outside
contractor for offsite treatment and dis osal. Facility ersonnel ins ect the oil 1 water
se orator twice weekly for levels and maintenance needs and the separator is cleaned out
annualiv by an outside contractor.
The seconda containment wall for the oil water separator holding tanks was observed to
have a significant crack and rather minor cracks and se arabons. No evidence of dischar e
w s observed but it is recommended the facility re air or " atch these areas to
orevent
future issues
The facilitv arounds were observed to be well kept and in 000d condition at the time of
ins ection,�
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA N
Is flow meter used for reporting?
0 El
El
13
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
IN 3
0
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
IN ®
110
(if units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
C1 El
N
El
Comment: A Soarlina inline flow meter, located lust before the dischar e point of outfall #001
measure flow from the facilit . The flow meter was calibrated on f51201 .
is used to
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NI
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
M 0
El
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
so
00
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Q
Comment, The facllijy was not dischg[ging at the time of ins action. No visual signs of ocillution were
-
observed below the outfall.
Page#

Allocco, Marcie
From: Allocco, Marcia
Sent Friday, November 21, 2014 1:17 PM
To: jennifer.bothwellC motiva nt.com'
Cc. Perry. u banks@ mecklenburgcountync.gov; Renard, Derek; Friday, Kenneth
(Kenneth,Friday@ ecklenburgcountync.gov)
Subject: RE: Motiva Enterprises / individual Stormwater Permits NCO0 2187 & NCO046892-
Ms. Bothwell,
Each of the hermits for the Motiva Charlotte facilities as been classified as PC-1., Physical Chemical grade 1, Classification
of facilities is based on the treatment technologies you have told the Division will be employed at the facility to meet the
permit limits as per N AC i 5A u c a ter tS. Below appears to be the reason that each facility was classified as per
the definition of "Physical" treatment in section .0102 and the classification hierarchy of PC systems in section .0306(a).
If these treatment technologies are no longer installed at the facility you can discuss these changes during permit
renewal as the description of the facilities should be updated, Since I am unfamiliar with your ether facilities I cannot
discuss their classification However, if any of the technologies noted below are installed at your other facilities they
may require classification as well.
As per .0306(a) the `following treatment processes are noted at the' facility each of which is a "physical" treatment of the
wastewater requiring classification
CO04689 Charlotte South Terminal
• Oil -water separator
• Granulated carbon filters (noted for groundwater remediation)
• Air stripper (noted for groundwater rerne la ion
CO022187 Charlotte North Terminal
Oil -water separator
If you have additional questions please let me < now,
Regards;
Marcia
From. [e-mail] [mailto:Jennifer,bothwell( motiv ent.com]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:25 AM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Cc: Perry.Eubanks@mecklenbur countync.gov Jenard, Derek; Weaver, Charles, Bennett, Bradley
Subject: R: Motiva Enterprises / Individual Storm water Permits NCO022187 &. NCO046892
Ms. Allocco
Thank you for the explanation. We are also wondering if it would he possible to eliminate the need for an ORC at these
facilities since there is no 'treatment" of the water other than retention in a pond prior to discharge. Motiva has 2
similar facilities and storm water discharge systems (pond only) in NC which are not required to have an ORC and we
would like to have the Charlotte facilities classified the same way if possible. Would it be appropriate to make this
request part of the permit renewal process
Thank you,
i

Marcia [maji
Ron; Denard, Derek; Weaver, Charles; Bennett, Bradley
Motiva Enterprises / Individual Storm water Permits NCO022187 & NCO046892
From information providerito the Regional Office Staff (I am located in the Mooresville Regional Office) it appears Mr.
Derek Denard (copied on this email) with our NPDES permitting group will be assigned your permit renewal once it is
received by the Division. Our website contains information regarding permit renewal at
S and the renewal applications are
available at ita s
The information requested is pretty straight -forward but either myself or Derek can assist with questions regarding the
permit renewal process. if I can be of further assistance please let me know,
Marcia Allocco
Marcia Allocco, MS — Senior Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
mard
Please note that effective Oct. 15, 2013, the MRO copy fee is $0.05/page, This applies to all copies; the first 25 pages
are no longer free.
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation,
From: Eubanks, Ron
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 5:11 PM
To: Bennett, Bradley
Cc: Pickle, Ken; Allocco, Marcia; Schweiber, Erich
Subject: FW: Motiva Enterprises / Individual Storm water Permits NCO022187 & NCO046892

VHi Bradley,
From the attached e-mail correspondence, who should Ms. Jennifer Bothwell (Motiva Enterprises) contact
regarding the renewal of their Stormwater Permits (NC0022187 & NCO046892)? Please send me an e-mail or
contact me at [phone] to discuss. Thank you.
Have a good evening.
Ron Eubanks, Environmental Specialist
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Phone: [phone] (office), [phone] (cell)
E-mail: Eerry.Eubanks @ M ecklenbu rgCountyNCgov
Consider the environment before printing this email or the attachment.
From: jennifer.botllwell@mqtivle,_nt.com Lm ALfltwLemfe nL,§p� ell pmotivaent-com
_ ftw
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 5:04 PM
To: Eubanks, Ron
Subject: RE: Motiva Enterprises / Individual Storm water Permits NCO022187 & NCO046892
Ron,
Have you received a response to this inquiry? We have not and we need to apply for renewal of our permits by the end
of December, Any assistance or gUidance you can provide would be appreciated,
Thanks,
Jennifer
Hi Bradley,
ROOM. in,
3

re`a great week..
I on A -Tv.

Or ANT4 V-WV
NCDENR
North Carolina department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Colen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 27, 2012
Mr. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motivo Enterprises, LLC
416 Tom Sadler road
Charlotte, North Carolina 2821
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No, NC 0466g2
Mecklenburg county, N
Dear Mr, Watson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on January 25, 2012, by Ms. Erin Hall of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement
between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. Please provide the facility's Operator
in Responsible Charge with the findings of the inspection by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report:
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions concerning
this report or any other matters please do not hesitate to call M. Allocco, or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Roelle MCWQP
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 616 Fast Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 tePhone.(704) 66 -16 9 t Fax: [phone] t Customer Service:1-877- 23-6748 ar i
Internet: .n aterquality,orq
An Equal Opportunity 1 Afrrmative Action Employer- 30% Recycted110% Past Consumer paper

Ur
fed.
40-0057
aims 8/31/98
ansaction Code NPDES Yr/Mo/Day Inspection Type Inspector
N 5 NCO046892 12/01/25 C C
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Rating BI QA Rese
OL 4 N N
i of t-acinty inspectea: entry i imewate:
-I-C. January 25, 2012
ninal 9:50 a.m.
Exit Time/Date:
January 25, 2012
10:20 a, m,
to Representatives/Title/Phone Number:
o / Operator in Responsible Charge / [phone]
ations Superintendent / [phone]
icial: ,s of Responsible Title: Carolina Complex Manager
, LLC --
Dad Phone Number: [phone]
14
Contacted: Yes
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected September 1, 2010, by Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was
issued on October 11, 2010.
ffgg#j���
INM=0 &ME Farsur 0=0 AFF101
7777
r rr r r• - » s - ° r
NPMS 000*�
Stormwater inside the containment basin is discharged from Outfall 001. The fuel loading rack
(which is roofed and bermed) drains to a separate oil/water separator prior to discharging to the
containment basin. Any petroleum products collected by the oil/water separator are hauled
away for appropriate treatment and disposal. Separated water from the system is held in tank
#90, which is located within the containment basin. The oil/water separator system was
replaced by a new system in September 2011 . Stormwater is held in the containment basin until
a visual inspection is completed and documented, then it is manually released from Outfall 001
The valve is kept closed and locked except during discharge events.
Treated groundwater is also discharged to the containment basin where it mixes with
stormwater prior to discharge from Outfall 001. Treated groundwater previously discharged from
Outfall 002, Outfall 002 has been decommissioned and was removed from the facility's permit.

C
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
DMRs were reviewed for the period November 2010 through October 01 . The reports
system are inspected daily.
SLUDGEHANDLING/DISPOSAL
The oil/water separator is pumped out on an annual basis or as needed by S.T.A T.
Environmental Services;

'fir 0/ foo 4837
P-Ppppp�
now
CERTIFIED MAIL T I VA
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ENTERRRISES LLC
October 22, 2010
RECEIVED
Ms.'Marcia Allocco DIVISION F WATER QUALITY
NC Division of Water Quality OCT 2 9 2010
Surface Water Protection
Mooresville Regional Office SWP SECTION
Salt} East Center Avenue, Suite 301
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Mooresville, NC 2811
Subject: Co pli` nee Evaluation Inspection 91112010
otiva Enterprises ILA
Charlotte South Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO046892
Mecidenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. 1
otiva Enterprises LLB utiva owns and operates the Charlotte South "TerminaL On October 11,
2010, the facility received a report regarding the September 1, 2010, Compliance Evaluation
inspection by Mr. Andrew Martin. In the cover letter to the report, Motiva is required to provide a
written response to the agency no later than November 5, 2010. The following responses are offered
in response to this request.
I e Fl t* At t three of the inspection, theflow ureter for Ou f `all l last
cal brated.Iuly 2 , 00 "'As noted in Part II cod NCO0 '9 , Section D, Monitoring andRecodes,
Item # 3 Flow Measurements flow measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated at a minimum
of otwe per,ye . ' Please enswre that theflow o meter is calibrated immediately. mediatel
_RMVo I t The wastewater ow meter in service at the time of the inspection, was =calibrated in
July 2009, but ' as not put into service until e e 2009. It is noted that the facility had
interpreted the "annual" requirement to be on a calendar year basis and not every 365 days, Based
on the results of the inspection and a discussion between ; Bob Sledge, DWQ, and Ms. Brittany
Robinson, LJRS, it is understood that the agency requires calibrations be conducted at least every 365
days
The site has both a primary and spare meter. On October 21 2010, the facility replaced the primary
meter with the sure teeter that was recently received back by the vendor and calibrated on July 12
2010. The facility now understands that the installed meter calibration is required every 365 days
rather than on a calendar year basis. 1n the future, the facility will work with the vender to create
calibration schedule to prevent meters being in use whose calibrations do not meet this requirement,
I .2: ` : "As motel in NCO046892 Footnote l to the Effluent Limitations andMonitoring
Requirements `duringperiods ofnoflow; the Per itt e shall submit a monthly Discharge
ointonag Report indicating 'No Discharge": Therefore a I R must be submitted each numthfor

pppms,rl
MarciaAllocco
NCB
October 22, 20 10
Page 2
ifall 00 tf `all 002 as long as they are listed as points of discharge in the permit" e
Division of Water Quality has :not received the f ll in D m
* 2Olt1 Rfear fallO o tfall O2
* February 2010 —July 201+ D,for Ouffall 002
Rgggp c 2 The above referenced e attached to this letter. The January 2010 was
submitted to the DWQ with a postmark date of February 16, 2010 and was received by the Division
can February 17, 2010. copy of the certified mail receipt and return receipt are attached to this
letter for your reference.
In y 2010, the facility applied for permanent removal of three units following wastewater
stripper (flocculation tank, clarifier, and hold tank). DWQ approved this request on September 30,
2010. Based on this new configuration, the facility has not discharged from Outt"all 002 since
September 2009. However, the facility decided to keep Outfall 002 as a permitted NPDES outfall.
Due to a misunderstanding, the reports for Outfall 002 were not submitted from February 2010 —
uly 2010. The facility thought that since there was no discharge, they did not need to submit the
DMRs. However, as this outfall is Mill permitted, the Facility understands that a trust he
submitted each month even if there is no discharge,
f you have any questions upon receipt of this letter, please contact Sam Baker, Complex
Superintendent at (7 2 -8 82 or Mr. Marco arat , Environmental Support person fort the
terminal a (1 461-1342.
Sincerely,
aaEe
Operations Superintendent
For: Ken Watson
Complex Manager
cc: Sam Baker, Motiva Charlotte Complex Superintendent
Marco rate, URS Corporation
RustyRozzelle, MCWQP
700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 20
Charlotte, NC 28202

r^r
.. `� •� �,l "shy ' ' ✓ "+a
�- � ,. � �v
w
6 Old. ►
:1 a
' ' • a
.,
.
.
s
M
664
sr
PRO
am,
w

! 1 �
� � ,�
# � x u
�, � ,� <
,. �,�,
�► w
. �. , . ,�,:. a<. �
�.
.. ..
■�
a .., � � .
r'. ��.
.. x � �
.. t � � �
e .; M
::a
". . .
s �""
f F
�. 3 t d! r
.? � �, � • �
It e
.. • a
t
.:. !► IR,, # w
r
� �` � � �R
a . � �, ,, k
ry
e s
s e . �, .
r
a e

w e
M
O w MOO
'� ✓ ,. � � �
,"� a _.
a: x ♦ tr;:-
x w ::v a
NMI 11-1 s
e
Ali � ♦
. !MAC* s m Al:.
w
.� v
`♦ „ , rt � c .ti! '`
;q
A M6....
A, t #.Ag,< f A(now
y.
aE
.:. 114 •� AF
! w ♦ p N x r.
filM
.«: .F
mum
X
ix �. ! �, �
', +;fix ,a° •+
kx s.• a • x .,
v rtq ..x • 4
v i

FiLL
Ai"LA.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen N. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 11, 2010
Mr. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motive Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LLC ;
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO046892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Watson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted
at the subject facility on September 1, 2010, by Mr. Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program (MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working
agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality, Please provide the
facility's Operator in Responsible Charge with the findings of the inspection by forwarding a copy of the
enclosed report.
This report highlights deficiencies with regard to the subject permit as detailed under the Flavor
Measurement and Self - Monitoring Program sections: It is requested that a written response be
submitted to this Office by no later than November 5, 2010, addressing the deficiencies noted in the
enclosed report. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco
at the letterhead address. Additionally, please send a copy of this response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle of
MC IQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or any other matters please do not hesitate to call Ms. Allocco or me at this
Office,
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protectio
Enclosure
cc. Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQ
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave„ Suite 301, Mooresville, NG 29115 One
Phone: [phone] Pax: [phone] t Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 N �`thCarolina

United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved,
EPA Washington , DC 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057
} Water (compliance Inspection Report approval Expires
8/31198
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDE Yr/Ma/Day Inspection Type Inspector
Facility Type
N 5 NCO046892 10/09/01 C
C 2
Remarks:
4
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
't
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring bating B1 QA
Reserved
0.5 3 N N
Section E: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected: Entry Time/Date:
Permit Effective:
Motiva Enterprises, LLC. 10.00 a.m. / Sept. 1, 2010
June' 1, 200
Charlotte South Terminal
6851 Freedom Drive Exit Time/Date:
Permit Expires:
Charlotte, NC 28214 11:05 a.m. / Sept. 1,2010
June 30, 2010
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives/Title/Phone Number:
Lanotchka Santiago / Operator in Responsible Charge / (704) 23-8082
Sam Baker / Operations Superintendent / (704) 35-808
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title: Carolina Complex
Mr. Ken Watson
Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road Phone Number: (704)
399-1904
Charlotte, NC 2814
I Contacted: No
Section : Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit Z Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance
❑ SSO (Sewer Overflow)
® Records/Reports M Self -Monitoring Program ® Sludge Handling Disposal
❑ Pollution Prevention
® Facility Site Review ❑ Compliance Schedules ❑ Pretreatment Program
❑ Multimedia
® Effluent/Receiving Waters ® Laboratory ; ❑ Stormwater
❑ Other
Section D: Summarydf FindingslCommerrts
See Attached Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s): Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
Andrew Martin MCWQP/[phone]'
September 20, 2010 `
Signature of Reviewer- , Agene.
Crate:
ENR - Division of Water Quality
�n cif ciirfnrp l nfpr Prntp.n inn — Mooresville Regional Office
October 8, 2010
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete

rMr. Ken Watson, Motiva South
Compliance Evaluation Inspection, Page 3
October 11, 2010
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected July 27, 2009, by Ms, Erin Hall of the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection/Notice of Deficiency report
was issued on August 18, 2009.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on June 1, 2006, and expires on June 30, 2010. The
permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater from Outfall 001 and treated groundwater and
truck loading rack stormwater from Outfall 002. The permit is currently expired and a permit
renewal application was submitted on December 29, 2009. A new permit is currently under
development by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Until the new permit Is issued the
permittee should continue to operate under the requirements of the expired permit.
The treatment works for Outfall 001 consists of containment basins surrounding the
aboveground storage tanks. Stormwater is held in these basins until a visual inspection is
completed and documented, then it is manually released. The treatment works for Outfall 002
consists of a groundwater remediation system. The system includes a series of recovery wells
an oil/water separator, dual particulate filters, two carbon vessels in series, a five -tray air
stripper, a catalytic oxidation system, flocculation tank, clarifier with overflow weir, and final
holding tank. The permit appears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
Outfall 002 is no longer in service and has been decommissioned. The wastewater from the
groundwater remediation system is being routed into the dikes and discharged from Outfall 001
The expired permit still lists 002 as an outfall.
•
The certification classification for NCO046892 requires that the facility have an operator in
responsible charge (ORC) with a Grade 1 Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
(PC-1) certification. The facility is staffed (ORC and back-up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification.
REC OR DSIRE PORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period July 2009 through June
2010, Please see the Self -Monitoring Program section below for issues highlighted during the
DMR review and noted in the DWQ Compliance Monitoring database,
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline, ethanol, and diesel fuel storage and distribution, The facility
has installed a new canopy and loading rack. All of the major components of the facility
treatment works were in service and appeared to be operating properly at the time of the
inspection,

Mr. Ken Watson, Motiva South
Compliance Evaluation Inspection, Page 4
October 11, 2010
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, a Class WS-1V waters of the
state in the Catawba River Basin, The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection.
No visual problems were observed within the outfall area,
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 001 is accomplished using an in -line flow meter. The flow meter
was last calibrated July 20, 2009, As noted in Part 11 of NCO046892, Section D, Monitoring and
Records, Item #3 Flow Measurements "flow measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated
at a minimum of once per year". Please ensure that the flow meter is calibrated
immediately.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
DMRs were reviewed for the period July 2009 through June 2010, The reports indicate that the
facility was meeting permit effluent limits during this period.
Before issuing the inspection report the Mooresville Regional Office also completes a file
review. The review found that the Division of Water Quality compliance monitoring database
had flagged the Motiva Enterprises South Terminal for multiple repotng violations since issuing
the last compliance evaluation inspection.
The compliance system generates violations after the data from your monthly Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) have been entered and compared with the requirements of your
permit, NC0046892, The database flagged the following violations:
• The Division of Water Quality has not received the January 2010 DMRs for Outfall 001
or Outfall 002.
• The Division of Water Quality has not received DMRs for Outfall 002 from February
2010 to July 2010, As noted in NCO046892 Footnote 1 to the Effluent Limitations and
Monitoring Requirements, "during periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a
monthly Discharge Monitoring Report indicating "No discharge"". Therefore a DMR
must be submitted each month for Outfall 001 and Outfall 002 as long as they are
listed as points of discharge in the permit.
Please submit the missing DMRs noted above by the response date mentioned in the
cover letter to this inspection. Failure to submit the noted DMRs by the noted response date
will result in the issuance of Notices of Violation for each reporting violation under NCO046892.
LABORATORY:
The permittee contracts with Test America (NC Laboratory Certification # 387) to perform all
chemical analyses specified in the permit and with E.T.T. Laboratories, Inc, (NC Laboratory
Certification # 022) to perform the Acute Toxicity testing specified in the permit, Neither Test
America, Inc, nor E.T.T. Laboratories, Inc, was evaluated during this inspection,

Watson Motive South
Compliance Evaluation Inspection, Page
October 11, 2010
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained. All components of the
treatment system are inspected daily including the oil/water separator.
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL
The coil/water separator is pumped out on an annual bads or as needed by .T.A.T.
Environmental Services;`

PWA
fps
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Glee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 30, 2010 RECEIVED
C)1i1ttht ot GUALITY
Ms. Denise Priesmeyer
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
910 Louisiana Street SWIP SECTION
Houston, TX 77002 MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Sc BJF, T-. Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 046892A01
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Charlotte - South Terminal
Permanent Removal of Wastewater Units
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. °es Byer:
A letter of request for an Authorization. to Construct was received July 26, 2010 by the
Division of Water Quality (Division), and final plans and specifications for the subject project
have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory;. Authorization is hereby granted for the
construction of modifications to the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant, with discharge of
treated wastewater into Long Creek in the Catawba River Basin.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
Permanent removal of the fallowing wastewater treatment units as part of the
groundwater remediation system: two (2) flocculation tanks, a clarifier, and a
holding t` (Tank 80), in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and
other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part 111, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NCO046892 issued April 19, 2006 d shall be subject to revocation unless
the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0046892.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 1 -215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
Location: 512 N. Salisbury t. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Nor hCarofina
Phone: [phone]l FAX: [phone] i Customer Service:1-877-623-674
Internet: www,ncwaterqualfty.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

M. Denise Priesmeyr, Environmental Coordinator
September 30, 2010
Page 2
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
..,....R..... ..... ...-.v .l; ye .,...._.... aL._ Il .,..,,._.,._,. aa.._... _i _.i9 a.._I__ ....__..___..I'.r.._ ..__ .. A A• .f.
LA"Xi Lau AAACLsiu %XU1311,5 Lilo '.
i Friday, excluding State
3ilidays
permitted facility, a
hat the permitted facility
-09" 1 Won- ".. M
RR sssA situ uVs14a4auaav ua a s✓s iw tilt/ .VGtVfu• 1 Aiu vat.aw: WL Lil� :3A4u3ASL A31Lsa L V la xt 4ALusA
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class 11,111 and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T1 rA:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Pennittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North
Carolina Darn Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.

Ms. Denise Priesmeyer, Environmental Coordinator
September 30, 2010
Page 3
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North
Carolina general Statute 143-215.5A to 143-21.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from:
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations,or ordinances which may be imposed: by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
y questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.F. at telephone
number (91 ) 715-6206.
Sincerely`
lol
oleen H. Sullins
st:sr
cc: Brittany Robinson, P.IE., U S Corporation, 1600 Perimeter Park Dr,, Suite 400,
Morrisville, NC 2750
Mecklenburg County Health Department
Technical Assistance end Certification Unit
Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Steve Tsadwa
ATC File

C
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
A To C No. 046892A01
September 30, 20 1
Engineer's Certification
i.- as a duly registered Professional Pnoineer in
r • •:•
NEW
}
)tte - South Terminal,
)r Motiva ]Enterprises LLC,
as used in the observation
Permanent removal of the following wastewater treatment units as part of the
groundwater remediation system: two (:) flocculation tanks, a clarifier, and a
holding ;t (Tank 0), in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and
other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
1 certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature Registration No.
mate
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DEN W
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2769-163

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen'H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary:_;
t.
An gust 9 2010
s. Denise Priesmeycr
M tiva Enterprises LLC
9 10 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
a
SUBJECT: Acknow le gernent of Request for an
Authorization to Construct
struct
Motiva Enterprises LLC
Charlotte South Terminal
Permanent Removal, f Wastewater units
NPL BS Permit No, NCO046892
Dear Mn Priesa ever;
The Construction on Grants and Loans Section received your request for an Authorization to
Construct, and the supporting documentation on .July 26, 2010, We will notify you and your
engineer upon completion of our review. Your proiect has been assigned to Steve Tsaclwa, fie
can be reached at (919) 715-62 0
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact tree at (919) " 15-6206.
Sincerely.
K--N Seth Robertson P.E., Supervisor
Construction Grants and Loans Section
Design Management Unit
dr
cc: Brittany; Robinson - URS Corporation
en' r`rr ilea
Steve Tsadwa E.I.
D 1phine Randall
TC" Files
1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633 Orle
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh:. North
Carolina 27604 "�t l lac!
Phone: [phone] i FAX: [phone] t Customer Service: i 877-623.67 t5 North
intemet: w .newwaterqualit+7.org
Are Equal Opportunity Q Affil aNve Action EmpMayer AMWAY

4r11VA
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 9, 2010
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rob Krebs, regional Water Quality Supervisor
DWQ Mooresville Regional Office, Division of Water Quality
FROM: Steve Tsadwa, Project Review Engineer
Design Management Unit
SUBJECT: Request for an Authorization to Construct
Charlotte South Terminal
f' ES> Permit No. l" CO 4 a 9
Plans, specifications n supporting documents have been received for the subject
project. It is requested that comments d recommendations, including the items listed below, be
received. by August 26 2010 front the Regional Office Staffa
_CAMA
Compliance With NCB Well Construction Standards
(Groundwater Comments
—Recommendations for inclusion in the Authorization to Construct
—Recommendations for inclusion in the Ikon Discharge Permit
Schedule for Issuance of the NPDES Permit
it
SOC, or Other Schedules Which Must be Met
Standby Power Need
Status of`Stor grater Permit
Plan documents •are submitted as follows for your reference, review, and comments on the above items:
— ; —Plans and Specifications
Subsurface Soils Report
—Power Outage Information
Other
If you have any questions, please contact nie at 919 ' 1 -62 0
Attachment
dr
cc: Steve "Tsda, Eats
e phine Randall
ATC Files
1633 mail Ser*e Seenter, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
G 728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One � Cabin
Phone: 919-73 1 FAX; 919-71 1 Cut er Service: 1-877-6 3-6748
Internet: www,ncvvaterquality.org 4
t r
An Equal \ Affirmative Action Employer

r
CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 0100 0004E2
TURN RECEWT REQUESTED
.July 19, 21
1062 TIVA
ENTERPRISES LC
1Y1I..owl-tut 7. t.a i4? it
NC Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants & Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center i
Raleigh, N.0 2799-163
Subject: ATC Application to Remove Wastewater Units at the
Motiva Charlotte South Terminal
t PDES Permit No. 1dICO04689
Dear r. Robertson:
Motiva Enterprises L C (Motiva) owns and operates the Charlotte South Terminal. This terminal is
covered under NPDES Permit No. NCO046892 which expired on June 30, 2010 permit renewal
package was submitted to the Division of Water `Quality in December 2010 (within 180 days prior to
permit expiration. As part of the permit application, Motiva requested the permanent removal of
the flocculation tank, clarifier, and holding (Tank 80) from the wastewater treatment system.
Permit A' Nation
Joe Corporon has been assigned the permit renewal for the Motiva terminal. Ms. Brittany
Robinson of URS Corporation spoke with Mr. Corporon of DWQ can June 8, 20 10, to discuss the
status of the application and the pertrument removal of the wastewater units listed above. Mr.
Corporon noted that the permit renewal may be delayed due to workload backlog. He did not see
y issues with removing the units as they do not provide any beneficial treatment (see description
below) and he did not want to hold up the permanent removal of the units. He recommended the
terminal proceed with removal of the units.
Therefore, the tenninal is submitting this separate request for permanent removal of these three units
to bath your office and the permitting branch. Ms. Brittany y Robinson discussed this project with you
on June 15, 2010 and the information your office will require. Attached is the following information
you requested:
• A`f`C Application Form (Note many items are NIA
• Flow Diagram with the units to be removed and the remaining treatment units
• Table summarizing the NPDES D1R analytical results since the bypass of the units in
October 2009
• Copy of the NPD S Permit

. Seth Robertson
NCDNER, DW
July 19,2010
Page 2
D scri ilon of Wastewater Treatment, System
The Charlotte South Terminal operates a groundwater remediation syster
groundwater d runs it through a treatment system consisting of dilly
Sincerely;
?�� w4w�
Ken Watson
Complex le g r
cc. Denise Pries ever, Motiva. I SM
Marco Zarate, URS Corporation
This system collects
:r separator, bagfilter,

Midiae� F, Easley
FILL Govemor
I t Benton
0
7 Chief Deputy Secretary
4 r-
> North Carolina Department of Environment and NaturW Resources
Alan W. Ornek, P,E,, Director
o1vislon of Water Quality
April 19,2006
Mr. Ken Watson, Complex Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
6851 Freedom Drive
Charlotte, NC 28214
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO046892
Charlotte — South Terminal
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Watson:
The Division of Water Quality (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the
subject facility. "This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the 11S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994, or as subsequently amended.
R-ENEWNL SUMMARY
The Division's renewal evaluation includes a reasonab lepia tentisis (RPA), in
accordance with permittinaidance provided by the EPA. The Division has made tire
following decisions based on current info ration and data from your discharge Monitonng
Report (DMRs) submitted over the last permit cycle:
* Turbidity --- Outfall 001 added limit of 50 N'F-Lf; Outfall 002, continue
monitoring, no limit.
® Benzene — Outfall 00t, retained permit limit (1.19 lig/1) and monthly
monitoring; Outfall 002- continue monthly monitoring, no limit.
* Toluene — Outfall 001: added pertnit limit (I I lLgq,) and monthly nronitorin&
Outfall 002: continue monthly monitoring, no limit,
* Phenol -- Outfall 001: revised limit to 91 gg/L. Outfall 002: deleted limit;
continue monitoring (see note).
* MTBE — Outfall 001: retained monthly monitoring. Out all 002: relax
monitoring to quarterly.
* Naphthalene — Outfall s 001 and 002, added monthly monitoring (see note).
* EPA Method 625 — Outfalls 001 and 002, deleted from permit (see note).
N, C, Division of Water Quality 1617 Malt Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 919-733-5083 Customer Service
1,-800-623-7748

Issuance of N11DES Permit NCO046892
Motiva Eiiteg)rises, LL
Charlotte __ South 'Te imal
Page 2of2
Changes to the Draft Permit -,Naphthalene nd Laboratory Method EPA 625, Because
monitoring by EPA Method 625 detected no parameters, the Division hremoved this
monitoring from the permit, in accordance with SCUP 2005. histead, they Division has added the
single parameter, Naphth gene with monthly monitoring to detect heavier- [bets such as diesel.
These changes were inadvertently omitted fro.m the drat permit.
Revised ` Phenol i 'it and Minimum Detection Levels. The Division acknowledges es ieativa's
request 17 rO6) to reconsider the phenot contribution of Outfall 002 to be zero, and to
recalculate the pertnit limit at 001 using the full site allocation. Because data showed no
reasonable polentialat Outflill 002, the Division has no objection to this request. Therefore,
using 04 ltaalday, the Cufall itl limit has been revised to 91lrf;/l�.f. it ticays fl'ren, drat tla
previously submitted laboratory rr infanta arRdet ction level of'50 lrg/l, is sufficiently sensitive to
accommodate this Inuit. The Division therefore retracts its request for a more sensitive test
procedure (see draft -permit cover letter).
If any parts, monitoring re lend s, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request, within
thirty 3 days following receipt of this letter. You must submit this request in the form of a
writtcn petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and file it
With the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 flail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
99-671 . 'Unless such a demand is made, this perrrut shall be final and binding.
Please notice that this pertnit is not transferable except t alter notifying the Division o'Water
Quality. The Division of Water Quality may modify, or revoke and reissue this permit This
permit does not affect your legal requirements to obtain other permits required by the Division of
Water Quality, the Division of hared Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or other
federal or local governments,
f you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please call Joe Crporon at 9 ) 733-
083, extension on 597 or email jRgCorporon@ncm il,.net.
Sincerely;
la
,444
•Alan W, Klimek-, , P.E.
Attached; NPDES Permit, l CO046892
cc: Central Files
A aaatie Tcrietzlcs tJait
Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Watcr Protection
DES Pro area
Philip o s, Environmental Engineer, Mcstiva Enterprises L C, 2232 Tern Ten Road, Apex NC 27539

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION A.TER QUALIT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE CIS WASTEWATER THE
MO N , C1'I�..._. i' I I CHCAE EL, R"T`IODN SYSTEM
IRIJ
in compliance withthe provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-2 5.t, other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adapted by the North Carolina Enviromnental Management Coin 'ssion, and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended,
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from caatf lls located at the
Charlotte - South Terminal
6851 Freedom Drive, Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Long Creek in the Catawba River Basin In
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in farts I;
II, ITI and IV hereof:
This permit shall become effective June 1 .
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2010.
Sighed this slay April , 2006.
Alan Wm Ali , Pm, Ili ctor
Division of Water Quality
y uthority ofthe n�viro ental �gen�ent C:ca isszcan

Permit NC0046892
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES lie its issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued pen -nit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge froni this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, ternis, and provisions described herein.
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
is hereby as
1. to cominue to operate a Water Pollution Control System for the treatment of stonnwater from diked
sorface-tank- storage areas (Outfall 001), and
2, to continue to operate a Water Pollution Control System for the treatment of groundwater and
to water from the track -loading racks area (Outfall 002), the treatment systern consisting of
• Oil/water separator
• Three Granular Activated Carbon (GA absorption units
• Air Stripper
• Flocculation tank
• Clarifier
• Holding tank.
at the Motiva - Charlotte South Terminal, a facility located at 6851 Freedom Drive, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, and
3, to discharge fi-orn said treatment facility through Outfalls 001 and 002 at specified locations (see
attached map) into an unnamed tributary of Long Creek, a waterbody classified as S-IV waters
within the Catawba River Basin.

Mof Long Creek
fl�U�w" ¢
Mot
� ^`w ha�� � �� R �4 •TM� �* f � iY" Enterprises, La,Lss
tte Property
S
Boundary
z �' � � ap 'R ,#' xrr i atone+tt �raa °�€w ✓✓ d^w...� .��* ^""^,k �,".� .3� �`` w�"
u) ne'
l
Out
z" t ,
g `a
(flows northwest)
7.
�4 "a♦ `� � � r ter* .w.-.� c e c
.may x
Q..m
x
'YC��°., ri.»'- # � ;� ''� ��� �� e.�,�: �°'»,, ro.�.,�v,�•� ..�'c �*� ��"�
Charlotte - Soutb Terminal
State Grill uad: FISSW I Mt Island Lake, N(' t'erukted Flow, not Limited
not to scale
LatLtude. 3 ° 16' aa,� N Lon atude, 80° 56' 271, w NPDES Pel'111it A E
itectevane aatcs nna: Ur to i c>n ree _Subs Bys n: Q3-0 -34 or
Mecklenburg (,outfit "
CatawtQ River Basin to°earn C'1 rss S 1
Drainage Basin:

Pen -nit NCO04689
A. (L) UFLUE" 'T LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING RFQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge storin-waterfrom, diked areas'via Outfall 001, Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Perinittee as specified below:
VXFT E l� . ITS ° 1 'T` TEE 1Tl f'T S
": TE STICS Monthly rally Nleasureme samplti Sample LO aktitin
A era e Maximum Fr uene 'T
Tlowt episodic 1 Effluent
Turbidity (1I�1 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Coil and Grease � � Monthly Crab Effluent
'Total Sus ended Solids � 4 O rn Mox thl Grab Effluent
Phenol — 11r Monthly lrab Effluent
Benzene Ll9 glf, _ Monthly Drab Effluent
Toluene e 21 It�L - Monthl Grab Effluent
Eth lbenzen Monthly Grab T (fluent
lane Mca tlal Grab � Effluent
M Mot t it drab Effluent
lea ialaalexse' � Motlzl a-ala fli�tat
Acute I'oxicitys Annually Crab Effluent
EootriQt sµ
I . 1. Flow --During periods of no flow, the Pennittee shall submit a monthly :Discharge Monitoring
Deport ( MR) indicating "No discharge." The Permittee shall monitor, each discharge event in
one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
la) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the outfall, this method of flaw
measurement should not be used for facilities with large runof collect on ponds);
c) estimate flow at 0-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or
d report floe based on discharge purnp to
2. Turbidity Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 N TU If receiving
strearn backkppound turbidity exceeds So NTl1, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase,
. tail tassel Grease - Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from
the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
4> MTBE please see :Part A.(4.) for other M TBE requirements.
. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 4-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3)]. Samples ,
for Acute Toxicity shall be collected concurrent with BTEX sampling.
The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts,
The Permittee shall discharge directly no tank: solids, no tank bottom water, or tank rag layer.
Following hydrostatic testing, the Permittee shall discharge no tank (or pipe) wastes containing benzene
concentrations exceeding 1.19 fLg/L, or toluene concentrations exceeding l l g/L.

PetT,nft NCO046892
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING RFQ1f1REMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of the perrait and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is autharized to
discharge treated groundwater and star. water from truck -loading racks via Outfall 002. Such
discharges shallbe limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LLWITS MONITORINGRE MENTS—
CHARACTERISTICS _Wfonthly Daily rYlaxitnuat F_Rea_suremeut Saff1ple Sample Lbeation
=�Av erae Fret uencv T e
Flowl Episodic Effluent
TITEX Monthly Grab Effluent
fail and Grease 2 Monthly TM j Grab Effluent
30.0 in Monthly Grab Effluent
iVir ntlrly Grab Effluent
Turbidity Quat turly Grab Effluent
,Phenol Qua te�I_X Grab Effluent
Quarterly Grab Effluent
Annually Grab Effluent
Acute Toxir
L1r_it_Y___
Footnotes'.
1. Flow --During periods of no flaw, the Permittee shall submit a Tnonthly Discharge Monitong
Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge." The Per mittee shall monitor each discharge event in
one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate -flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the
outfall; (this method of flow measurement should not be used
for facilities with large runoff -collection ponds);
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge
event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
2. Oil and Grease — Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skinimed from the
surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone,
3, Turbidity — Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
4. MTBE — Please see Part A,(4.) for other MTBErequiremtints,
5 Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3.)]. Samples for
Acute Toxicity shall be collected concurrent with BTEX sampling.
)> The Perinittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
> The Permittee shall discharge directly no tank solids, no tank bottom water, or tank rag layer.
Following hydrostatic testing, the Permittee shall discharge no tank (or pipe) wastes containing benzene
concentrations exceeding 1.19 gg/L, or toluene concentrations exceeding I I g&

Permit NCO0462
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORINGEUI ETS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (3m) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The Permitt e shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in EPA Document
P / 00/4- 0/027 entitled "Methods t°or Measunmig the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephates prom c s
24-hour static test Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste
treatment. The. Perrtrittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of
the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and
reported by June 3€ , If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this
elate. Toxicity testing will be perhinned on the next `discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TA 6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered can the Effluent Discharge Forin -(MR-1) for the i outh in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Fonn AT-1 (original) is to be seat
to the following address.
Attention: North Carolina Division sion of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 76.9 1 21
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed it association with the toxicity tests, as well as all close/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed y the North Carolina
Division of Water (duality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
`E. Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism, survival`and appropriate environtnental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require iturnediate fallow -up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring,

lie it NCO046892
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING RE QUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (3.) MTBE MONITORING - SPECIAL CONDITION
For the protection of public health, oil terminal Perniittees that discharge to waters classified as
water supply (WS waters) shall monitor MTB E for the duration of this pennit. Based on data
submitted by the Permittee, the Division has reduced Monthly monitoring to Quarterly. If MT BE is
detected during this permit cycle, the Pennittee shall immediately resume Monthly monitoring for
MTBE.

NPDES Pennit Requirements
Pa c I of 16
PART 11
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES PERMITS
Section Am Definitions
2ZMonth
Samples are collected twice per month with at least ten calendar days between sampling ents.
JZEe—&
Samples are collected three times per week on three separate calendar clays.
.A t or "°the Act`°
e Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33'USC 1251, et.. seq.
An u—a Aver
e arithmetic mean of all„ y'disch " of a pollutant measured dining the calendar year. In the case of feel.
coliform, the geometric mean of such discharges.
A.rithmetic Mean
e surnination of the individual values divided by the number of individual values.
ass
of a treatment
e known diversion of waste streams from y po orit facility including ties collection syste high
is not a designed or established or operating mode for the facility.
Calendar Day
e period from ht of one day until midnight of the next clay. However, for purposes of this perrnit, any
consecutive 24-bour period that reasonably represents the calendar clay may be used for sampling.
f,al Qu , ter
One of the following distinct periods- January through March, April through June, July through" September, d
October through December.
ber.
C Q P91 tale
A sample collected o a : -lea `cad y continuous sampling or combining b s fates of �t 1 st 1 tlfi zni .
such a manner as to result in a total sample representative of the wastewater dischargeduring the sample period. The
Director may designate the most appropriate method (specific nurnber and size of aliquots necessary, the
time
interval between grab samples, etc.) on a case -by -case basis. Samples may be collected manually or automatically.
Composite osite le y be obtained by the following methods:
1 Continuous: a single, continuous sample collected over 24-hour`sad proportional to the rate of flow.
Constant ` e ble volume: e: a series of grab samples collected at equal time intervals over a :24 hour
period d of discharge and combined proportional to the rate of flow measured at the time of individualsample
caliection, car
doble e cont dal e: a `es of samples off q volume collected overa .24 hourperiod
vvidt the time intervals between samples determined by a preset number of gallons passing the sampling
point. Flow measurement between sample intervals shall be determined by use, of a flow recorder and
totalizer, and the preset gallon interval between sample collection fixed at no greater than 1 24 of the
expected total daily flow at the treatment syste or
(4) Constant t ' ' e/coons t volume- a series of gmb samples of equal volume collected over a 24-hourperiod a
a constant time interval. is method may only be used in situations ere effluent flow rates vary
less than 15 percent. The grab samples shall be taken at intervals of no greater than 20 minutes apart
during any 24-hour period east be of equal size and of no less than 100 milliliters.rise of this method
requires prior roved by the Director.
�,tr�t�iEat� fi1i?C13

' . P=teat Regt rc:me ats
Page 2 of 16
In accordance with 4) above, influent grab samples shall not be collected more than sense per hour,
Effluent grab samples shall not be collected more than once per hour except at wastewater treatment systems
having a detention time of greater than 24 hours. In such uses, effluent grab samples may be collected at
intervals enly spaced over the 24-hourperiod that are equal in number of hours to the detention time of the
system in number of days.However, the interval between effluent grab samples may not exceed sit hours nor
the number of samples less than four during a 24-hoursampling period.
Continuous -flow s e t
Flow monitoring that occurs without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility. Flow shall be
monitored continually except for the infrequent times when there may be no flow or for infrequent maintenance
activities on the flow device.
Daily Fische
e discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24-hourgeed that reasonably represents the
calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants measured in 'its of mass, the "daily discharge" e" is calculated as
the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. The "daily discharge" concentration comprises the mean
concentration for a 24-bour sampling period as either a composite sample concentration or the arithmetic mean of all
grab samples collected during that period. (40 CFR 122.3)
ball' Maximum
717he highest "'daily discharge' during the calendar wrath.
Dag
Parameters requmng daily s pling shall be sampled 5 out of every 7 days per week unless otherwise specified in the
pen -nit, The Division expects that sampling shall be conducted on -weekdays except where holidays or other
disruptions of normal operations prevent weekday sampling. If sampling is required for all seven days of the week:
fear any permit << xeter( ), that requirement vAll be so noted 'on the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Page(s),
P
WQ or `the siori'�
e Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Nantral Resources.
:1
e North Carolina Envirorunental Management Commission.
Fa ° ° 'lcas e
e cessation of wastewater treatment at a permitted a ` 'ty, or the cessation of all activities that require coverage
under the NPDES. Completion pletion of facility closure will allowthis permit to be rescinded.
Cie- e me -Ue man
The Nth root of the product of the individual lues where N = the number of individual values. For purposes of
calculating the geometric mean, values of "fly' (or " [detection level)'' shall be considered =1.
C r la le
Individual ples of at least 100 nil collected over a period of time not exceeding 15 minutes. Grab samples can be
collected manually. Grab samples must be representative of the discharge (car the receiving strearn, for instrearn
samples).
1 circus -Substance
y substance designated und40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of'the Cie -an Water Act.
Ln-s-tantaneous flow meast
measure of flow taken at the time of sampling, when both 'the sample and flaw will be representative of the total
discharge.
Version 612012003

Nl'DES Penmit Regkdrements
Page -1 of 1"
MAont l A.vera e concen titan . ; jt
The th etic mean of all "' disch g '° of a pollutant measured during the calendaroath. In the case of fecal
coliform, the geometric mean of such discharges.
RP=MiLlssuing Author]t
e Director of the Division of Water Quality.
u rl Av a e cancers ` tion is "t
The average of all samples taken over a calendar quarter:
Severe ro MM da maPe
Substantial, physical damage to prop ty, damage to the trey t facilities which causes tlx to become inoperable,
or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expecte to occur in the absence of a
bypass. Severe property, damage excludes econOtnic loss caused by delays in production.
To "c p ll tm
y pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean "hater Act.
UP —Set
An incident beyond the reasonable control of the Pe tree causing unintentional and temporary noncompliance with
permit effluent limitationsand/or, monitoring requirements. An upset does not include noncompliance caused by
operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate to treatment facilities, lack of preventive
rawntenance, or careless or improper opet ticaat.
Weekly Air e c nc o don t
The atithinetic meanref an "y discharges" of a pollutant measured during the calendar week. In the case Of fees]
colio' , the 'geometric mean of such •dish ges.
SectoxaB.-General n itioxns ;
L pi tca ca pig
e Pe `tree must comply with all conditions of this pernrit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation
of the Clean dater Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation d reissuance,
or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application J40 CFR 122.41):
a, The lie t�tee s comply with effluent standards prohibitions established and section 307(a) of the
dean WaterAct for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established
under
section $(d) of the Clean Water Act within the time provided in the regulations drat establish these
standArds or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, sal, if the permit has not yet, be
en
modified to incorporate the requirement
b, The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates section 301, 302 306, 307, 309, 318 or 405 of the
.Act, or any Permit condition or Urnitation implementing y such sections in a permit issued under section
402 or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) of 402(b)(8)
of the Acts is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $25, day for each violation. [40 CFR 122.41 (a)
(2)
c. The Cleanstater Act provides that any person 'who mgfig a l violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 309, 318, or
5 of the Act, of any condition or limitation implementing y of such sections in a permit issued udder
section 402 of the Act, or any requirement unposed in a pretreatment program approved under section
(a)(3) or 2(b)(g) of the Acts is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,0M per day of violation, or
imprisonment ofnot tnore than l year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a
negligent violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties ; of not more than 5 ,000 pet day of
*violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years, or bath. [40 CFR 1 Z2.41 () (2))
i,Pm n RIP012003

Page 4of16
d. Any person who knoxingly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal
penalties of $ ,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. In
the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knovingviolation, a persona shall be subject to Criminal
penalties of not more than $1 0,00 i per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than years, or both.
4f1 CFR 12141 (a) (2)]
e. Any person who knowingly -violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 4.05 of the Act, or any pernait
condition or limitation implementing y of such sections in a pet rtt issued under section 402 of the Act,"
d who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent dangercif death or serious
bodily injury, shallupon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or ninprisonment of not
more than 15 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment
violation, a person shall be subject to a .haze of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than
30 ye2rs, or both. An organization, as defined in section 30(c)(3)(l3)(iii) of the CWA, shall;., upon conviction
of violating the imminent g provision, be subject to a fine of not' more than $1 i` 00,000 and can be fine
up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions, [40 CFR 122.41 (a) (2)
f. Under state' law, a civil penalty of not more than 25, per violation may be assessed against any person
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. (North
Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A]
g. Any person may be assessed an admaustrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301, 302,
306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of Act; or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such
sections in 2 permit issued under section 402 of this Act. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are
not to exceed $10,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed
$2 ,C1M Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $10,000 per day; for ch• day; dining which the
violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class 11 penalty not to exceed $125,000. 40 CFR
122.1 (a) ()
2. DIIW-1219tigto
The Pe `tree shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in
violation of this peratit'which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment
3. C '' " C isai bili
Percept as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing" (Part II. C. , "Upsets" (Part II. C. 5) and "Power
Failures" (Part II. C.. 7), nothing in this permit shall ' e construed to relieve the Permittee from y
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 14-2:15.3 143-215.6 or Section 30
of the Federal Act, 33 LUSH. 1319. Furthermore, the Pertnittee is responsible for consequential es, such as
fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
4. f it d dcias esb ce biiit
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the Permittee
from y responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the Pertnittee is or lie subject to under NCGS 1 -
215.75 et seg. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USG 1321. Furthermore, the Perinittee is responsible for
consequential damages such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be
temporarily suspended.
5. r` erg ht
e issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any
exclusive privileges, nor aloes it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal fights, near
any infringement of Federal,State or local laws or regulations 40 CFR 122.41
6. Onshore or Offshore ConsMiction
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical structures or
facilities or the undertaking ofany work in y navigable waters.

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 5 of 1('
7. e bihty
The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of tb
permit to any circumstances, is held invalid., the application of such provision to rather circumstances, and the remaind
p thereby 1.
of this permit, shill not be affected thereb If}-
The
laary tcs l+'z`eavade lrzfo atican
la 'tree shall fornish to the Permit Issuing AuthorityAuthoritywithin a reasonable time, any information which the
Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or
terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Permittee shall also furnish to the
Permit Isgg Authority upon request, copies of records required by this permit [4 } CFR 122,41 (h)],
IAA to Reap taly
If the Permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this perrait, the
Pennittee must apply for and obtain a new permit [40 CFR 122.41 )]"
m ' don of pe t
e Permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiration clue, In order to receive auto tic
authorization to discharge e beyond the expiration date, the Pemiittee shall submit such information, forms, and
fens as, are required by the agency authorized to issue permits no later than 180 days prior to the expiration elate.
Any p ittee that has riot requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, or any permitter that does not
have a permit after the expiration and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, will subject
the permittee to enforcement procedures as provided m NC S 143-21 .6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
All
applications, :reports, or information submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority shall be signed and certified
(40 CFR 122.41 )[
a. AJ1 permit applications shall he signed as follows:
tl) For a corporation-. by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section, a responsible
corporate officer means: (a); a president, secretary, treasurer or vttce president of the corporation in
charge of a principal business function, or my other person who performs similar policy or decision
making functions s for the corporation, or ) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or
OP erating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to nuke management decisions which govern the
operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital
investment recommendations, and initiating wad directing other comprehensive measures to assure long
tern environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that
the necessary systems e established or actions taken to gather,complete and accurate information for
permit applications requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated
to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures
(2) For a partnership or scale proprietorship: by a general parmer or the proprietor, respectively-, or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public a by either a principal e officer or
ranking elected official [40 CFIL 122.22).
b, All reports required by the permit d other information requested by the Permit Issuing Authority shall be
signed by a person described in paragrapha. above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A
person is a duly authorized representative only f
1, The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
. The authorization specified either in individual or a position having responsibility for the overall
operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or
well field, superintendent., a position of equivalent responsibility, or an individualor position having
overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly -authorized representative may
thus be either a named individual or ' y individual oc a named position.)
. The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122.22

. Changes to, authorizatiom if an authorization n under paraf aph (b) of this section is no longer accurate
because a ;different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new
authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted to the Director
prior to or together xith any reports, information, or applications to be ,signed by an authorized
representative f4O CFR 122221
d. Certification. Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of dais se . 'on sham make the
following certification [0 CFR 122, 21:
�l t ertr"fy, tinder penally of law, that this document and all attachments ents were prepared trader ray direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the infonnation submitted. Based on ray inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for g tharing the infd ati n, the infonnation strbtri teed is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. te. 1 am aware that there are signilicantpenalties for submitting false info Lion,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations:
12, _PernfitActions
This perrmit may be modified, revolted and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the
Permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned
changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition 140 CFR 12241 ( �
I Pe t odificatiors Itevocatiora eiss i ce r e isoation
e issuance of thispen-nit doses not prohibit the permit issuing authority from reopening d rnsidif*g the
perm. it, revoking and reissuing the permit, or tenninating the permit as a to ed by the laws, miles, and regulations
contained in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122 and ` 123; Title 15A of the North Carohna
Administrative Code, 5ubchapt .010 d North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 eta al.
14. Arsrszxals waist `' arse Cis 1z `ce o `tcsrirs 1 ce lie oements
The Pernuttee must pay the annual administering d compliance monitoring fee days after being
,aided b the Division. Failure to pay the fee , a timely manner in accordance 'th 13A NC' 1 5 ) ()
y cause this Division to initiate action to revoke the pennit.
Section. . Ct oration d atesaace o I'oilcttion +�ositrols
1. ' `ed for
Upon classification of the permitted facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall ploy a
certifihd water pollution control treatmcnt system operator . responsible charge (OR.C) of the -water pollution
control treatment system. Such operator must hold a certification of the grade equivalent to or greater than the
classification assigned to the vmter pollution control treatment system by the Certification , Commission. `The
Permittee must also employ one or more certifiedBack- p.O Cs who possess a currently valid certificate of the
type of the system. Back-up' ORCs must possess a grade equal to (car no more than one grade less than) the grade
of the system 15A NCAC 8G.0201],
e O C of each Class I facility must
* Visit the facility at least weekly
Comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 8G.0204.
'Ihe ORC of each Class II, III and IV facility must
• Visit the facility at least daily, excluding e d d holidays
• Properly manage and document daRy operation and maintenance of the facility
• Comply with all other conditions of l SA NCAC 8G.0 04.
Once the facility is classified, the Pennittee shall submit a letter to the Cerdfication Commission designating the
operator in responsible charge:
a. Within 60 calendar days prior to wastewater being introduced into a new system
Version 612012003

I` PDES Pe tit, Requirements
Page 7 of 16
b. Within 120 calendar days of
Receiving notification of a change in the classification of dne system requiring the designation of 2
new CRC and hack -up ORC
A vacancy in the position of ORC or back-up O1t.C.
Mgm
tioin d ` to. shall at all ' es pro d t e resoces necess to op to the s g
` efftci c. e es properly ope t aitn ` all fa " `ties arid.Brat cl ct r�tcol {axces which e ins ed or used y the Pe `ttee to
` ce di the ccsrxditiotns of this p pit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate
laboratory controls and;appropriate quality assurance procedures. 1his provision requires the Pe tree to ins
tall
d operate backup or auxiliary facilities 0111YUhen necessary to achie e compliance with the conditions of the
pen -nit [40 CFR 122.41 (e).
I1ed to %loll rsr Reduce rnot a lief se
It shall tncnt b a defense for a P ttee in an, enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this permit t4O CFR 12141
(c)1"
4. ass` of rea t pa 'Mies
a,' I�yp s txot e `taticans [4F1 C 1 41 ( ) �2}�
e l? tniCtee y allo y bypass to oc which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but
only s zt atsn is for t c ro s e effigy t operation. These bypasses are not subject to the
faro ' iorns cif Alas +, d c. of this se 'otir
b.
Notice [40 CFR 12.41 ( ( )
Anticipated buss. If the P ttee knows advancein of the reed for a bypass, it shah submit prior
notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass: including an evaluation of the
anticipated quality and effect of the bypass,
(2) , Unanticipated bypass. The Pennittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in p
art
I. E. 6 (24-hournotice),
c. Prohibition of Bypass
h%
(I) Bypass from the treatment facility is rolSized d the Permit Issuing Authority e enforcement
action against a Permittee for bypass,unless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe prep e;
) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities,
retention of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This
condition `is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment should have been installed in the exercise of
reasonable e g judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal piods of
equipment o e or preventive maintenance; and
(C) The Permittee submitted notices as requiredtier Paragraph b. of this section.
(2) Bypass from the collection system is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement
action against a Permitted for a bypass as provided in any current or future system -wide collection system
permit associated -with the treatment facility.
() The Permit Issuing Authority may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if
the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet tine three conditions listed above in Paragraph c.
(i) of this section.
sets
a. Effect of an upset [4O CFR 122.41 (xn) (2)]= An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an adorn
brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent t 'tati sns if the requirements of
Paragraph b. of this condition are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that

Rage 8 of 16
noncompliance was caused by upset, and before ate Faction for nonconlisliance, is final administrative action
subject to judicial review,
b. Conditions necessaq fora demonstration of upset. ri Permittee who wishes to establish the
affirmative defe of upset shall demonstrate,through properly signed, contemporaneous operating lags, or
other relevant evidence that.
(1) An upset occurredand that the Pernuttee can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(2) The p ttee facility was at the tirne being properly operated; and
(3) The PermiTtee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part 11. E. 6. of this pei t
(4) The 9.= ernutte efi complied idi any remedial asur s rec e d Linder Part 11. B, 2. of this p eant.
d. Burden of proof (40 CFR 1'72.41(n) (4))LL The Permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of ,in
upset has the burden of proof in any enforcement proceeding.
6, -RemovedSubstances
Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters
shall be utilized/disposed of in accordancewith NCGS 143-215.1 and in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant
from such materials from to ` g waters of the State or navigable, waters of the United States. The Retrainee
shall complywith all existing Federal regulations governing the disposal of sewage sludge. Upon promulgation of
40 CFR part 503, any permit issued by the Permit Issuing :Authority for the utilization/disposal of sludge a be
reopened and modified, or revoked and reissued, to incorporate applicable requirements at 40 CFR 501 The
Permittee shall comply -with applicable 40 CFR 503 Standards for. the Use d Disposal of Sewage Sludge (when
promulgated) the time provided in the regulation, even if the permit is not modified to incorporate the
requirement. e Pertnittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority of any significant change in its sludge use
r disposal practices.
7. P_owerFailures
e Permittee is responsible for maintaining adequate safeguards (s required by 15A NCAC 2H.0124
Reliability) to prevent the discharge of untreated or inadequately 11 treated i s during electrical power failures -
either by means of alternate power sources, standby generators or retention of inadequately treated effluent.
Section . Monitorin gnr and Records
1. It resetsta ` e a 1iss
Samples collected and'measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of the volume and nature of
the permitted discharge. Samples collected at a frequency less than shall be taken on a day and time that is
characteiistic of the discharge over the entire period the sample represents, samples shah be taken at the
monitoring points specified in this permit and, unless otherwise specified, before the effluent joins or is diluted
by any: other testy body of water, or substance. Monitoring points shall not be changed without
notification to and the approval of the Permit Issuing Athority [40 CFR 1 42
2, e o
Monitoring results obtained during the previous anth(s) shah be summarized for each month and reported on a
monthly Discharge Monitoring Report ) Form 1, LI, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the
Director, postmarked no later than the 28th day following the completed reporting period.
e first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new
facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of disch ge* to signed copies o
these, and all other reports required herein, shall be submitted to the following address:
NC DENR/Division of Water °ty / Water QualitySectiota
Files '
117 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699- 617
Version 612012003

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 9 of I
3, Flaw Measurements
ents
Appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific practices slid be selected
and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of monitored discharges. The
devices shall be installed, calibrated and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements is 66nsistent
with the accepted capability of that type of device. Devices selected shall be capable of measuring flows with a
maximum deviation of less than 10% from the true -discharge rates throughout the range of expected discharge
volumes. Flow measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated at a minimum of once per yen and maintained
to ensure"that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent with the accepted capability of that type of device.
e Director shall approve the flow measurement device and monitoring location prior to installari=
Once -through condenser cooling water flow monitored by pump logs, or pump hour metersas specified in Part I
of this permit and based can the manufacturer's pump curves shall not be subject to this requirement.
Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the E C regulations (published pursuant to
NCGS 143-215.63 er seq.), the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant to
Section 3 4(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water pollution Control Act (asAmended), and 40 CFR 136; or in
the case of sludge use or disposal, approved under 40 CFR 136, unless otherwise specified in 40 CFR 503, unless
other test 'procedures have been specified in this permit [40 CFR 122411.
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this permit, all test procedures must produce
mirdinum
detection and reporting levels that are below the permit dischargerequirements d all data generated must be
reported do to the . i detection or to repo level of the procedure. If no approved methods, are
determined capable of achieving minimum detection and reporting levels below permit discharge requirements,
then the ' most sensitive (method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must
be used.
aloes for Tam -ing
e Clean "dater .Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knovAngly renders inaccurate, any
monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall.., upon conviction, be punished by
a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or
by bath. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed tte after a first conviction of such person under this
,paragraph,punishment is a fine of not more than $ 0,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more
than 4 years, or both [40 CFR 122.41].
. —Record R.et tton
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the P ttee's sewage sludge
use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five y (or longer as required by
40
CFR 503), the Permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including.
all calibration and maintenance records
original 'p chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation
• copies of all reports required by this permit
copies of all data used to complete the application for this permit
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample,
measuremcnt, report or Application. This period ay be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 C
FR
122.41].
7. ecor�g .esults
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit, the Perraittee shall record
e following information [40 CFR 122,411
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or is
b. The;individual(s) who performed the sampling ormeasurements;
c: The'date(s) analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s) who performed theanalyses;
° • . pia r`rrrr lfiC^i}ti:� ;

Page 10 of 16
e, The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
The Pcrmittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting
as a representative of the Director), upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required
by law, to;
a . Enter upon the Permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where
records must be kept and the conditions of this permit-,
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this
permit;
c, Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices,
or operations regulated or required under this permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose-- of assuning permat compliance or as otherwise
authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location [40 CFR 122-41
�Jec�tion E �ortin �e nivaenrs
1. L-h-ange in Discharge
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge
of any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a leveJ in excess of that authorized shall
constitute a violation of the permit,
1 P !an_n_edkhan _g_es
The Permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or
additions to the permitted facility t4LO CFR 122.41 T1. Notice is required only hcn-
a. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for new sources at 40 CF.R
12129 (b); or
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants
discharged. This notification applies to pollutants subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to
notification requirements under 40 CFR 122.42 (a) (l)�
c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change M_ the Perinittee's sludge use or disposal practices,
and such alternation, addition or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different
from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported
during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.
3. A-n-ti-c-ip-sated -N-QDc—o-m-plia—nce
The Pe' `tree shall give advance notice to'the Director of any planned changes to the permitted facility or other
activities that might result in noncompliance with the permit [40 CFR 122-410) (2)].
4. Ihn-sf—ers
This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to the Director. The Director may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit to document the change of ownership, Any such action
may incorporate other requirements as may be necessary and the Clean Water Act [40 CFR 122.410) (3)].
Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit W CFR 12141 (1) (4)].
ak Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) (See Pan 11. D. 2) or forms
provided by the Director for reporting results of monitoring of sludge use or disposal practices.
bthe Perraittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMIL
Version 612012003

NPDES Permit Requirements
Pale I of1
'l:'en ®foaar lrltsair l�eraar ' �
size Ise ittee shah report to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office any noncompliance that
potentially threatens public health or the environmenr, Any information shall be provided orally within 24
hours from the time the Permittee became aware of the circuarstanccs. A written submission shag also be
provided within 5 days of the time the Permittee becomes aware of the circumscmccs. The written
submission shall contain description of the noncompliance, and its cause; the period of noncompliance,
including act dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expacted to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccUltence of the
noncompliance [40 CFR 12.41 ) ()]
b. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under this section if the oral
report has been received within 24 hours.
. Occurrences outside noting business hours may also be reported to the Division's Emergency Response
personnel at (800) 62-795 w, [phone] or (19) 733-3300.
7. Clther l o�nco ` ce
The Perritittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported - under Part 11. E. 5 and 6. of this permit at
the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in IL E 6, of
this permit [40 CFR 122.410) )
8. Other InforrnatiOn
Where .the Permatee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in n permit application, or
submitted incorrect information a permit application or in y report to the :Director, it shall promptly submit
such facts or information [40 CFR 12.2.41 ) (8))°
9. 9nn
Excittioararepor office or the a prop ' to regional office of the
oiss24 lase s or on the next car ° g day follow `nag the
ao leoige s f the oc ce of y of the foilog
a. Any occurrence at the water pollutions control facility which results in the discharge of significant amounts of
wastes which are abnormal quantity or characteristic, such as the dumping of the contents or a sludge
digester; the known passage of a slug of hazardous substance through the facility; or any'other unusual
circurnstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that reader the facility incapable of adequate
wastewater t such as mechanical or electrical failures of PUMPS, aerators, o pressers, eta.
c y failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a bypass directly to receiving
waters s thout treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such station or fa ` 'ty.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a writtenreport within 5 daps following first
knowledge of the occurrence,
10. Amailahilitl of
Except for data 'determined to be confidential d NCGS 143rt (a)(2) or Section 308 of the Federal Act, 33
U C 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection at the suffices
of the Division n f Water Quality. As required by the Act, effluent data shalll not be considered confidential.
Knowingly g any false statement on any such: report may result in the imposition of ciuninal penalties
as
provided for in NCGS 143-2151(b)(2) or in Section 309 of the Federal Act
11. fe aides fSr Ealsification of R orts
e Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly es false statement, representation, or
certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including
monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance ce shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of
F1prsinn ,V-901 003

NPDES Pe `t Requirements
Page 13 of 16
.,adverse ` pacts to waters of the State_ `s Permit not be rescinded while any activities requiring s permit
continue at the permitted facility.
PART IV
SPECUL CONDITIONS FOR MUNCIPAL FACILITIES
Secticatt .. Pulacl rtecl °matt ent ' ,rlc. iPt
All
Pt s must provide adequate notice to the Director of the hallo
1, Any new introduction of pollutants into the POTW from ect discharger whichwould be subject to
section 301 or 306 of CWA if it were directly discharging those pollutants;
and
2. Any substantial change in the volume of character of pollutants being traduced by an indirect discharges
as influent to that POTWat the time of issuance of the permit
3. For purposes of this paragraph, adequate noticeshall include information on (1) the quality and quantity of
effluent introduced into the POTW, and (2) any anticipated impact of the change on the quantity or duality
of effluent to be discharged from the
Seetieth l ftanicPB
rrol of s from
fncs ali ai u.lsem-,
1. Effluent limitations are listed in Part I of this pertnit. Other pollutants attributable to inputs from
industries ing the municipal system may be present in the Permittees discharge. At such time as
sufficient information becomes available to establish limitations for such pollutants, this permit may be
revised to specify effluent limitations for any or all of such other pollutants in accordance with best
practicable technology or water quality standar&
Z Under no circumstances shall the Pe tree allow introduction of the following wastes in the waste
treatment system:
a. pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the Pt , including, but not limited to,
wastestrearns with a dosed cup flashpo` t of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees
Centigrade using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21,
b. Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural
to the POTW, but in no case Discharges
with pH lower than 5.0, unless the works is p designed to accommodate such Discharges;
C. Solid or vucous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow the PCi
TW
resulting iInterference;
. Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (13OD, etc.) released in a Discharge at a flaw
toand/or pollutant concentration which will cause Interferencewith the PO ;
e. Heat in o is which wM it"bit biological activity in the POTW result` in Interference, but in
no case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the POW"Treatment Plant exceeds 40T
(1 04° s the Division, upon request of the PO , approves alternate temperature limits;
f: Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting tail, or products of mineral tail origin o is that
cause interference or pass through;
g. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes -within the POTW in a
quantity that may cause acute worker health d safety problems;
h. Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the PO .
3 With regard to the effluent requirements listed in Part l of this' permit, it may be necessary for the
Pertnittee to supplement the requirements of the Federal pretreatment Standards (40 CFR, Part 403) to
ensure compliance by the Permitter: with all applicable effluent limitations. Such actions by the Permittee
y be necessary regarding some or all of the industries discharging to the municipal system.
4. The Permittee shalt require e indusmal discharges sending ` influent to the permitted system to meet
Federal Pretreatment Standards promulgated in response to Section 307(b) of the Act. Prior to accepting
wastewater from y significant industrial user, the Peculittee shall either develop elop submit to the
4lsxrrvnn �1"aik:317t1`�

* i�Sf'[:��:`� e'er c ��la.zo.cotrzaetats
Rage 14of16
Division n a Pretreatment Prograrn for approval per 15A NCA : 2H .0907(a) or modify an existing
Pretreatment la oagram per 15A 1 CAC 2C1.0907(b).
5. is permit shall be modified or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to incorporate or modify an approved
POTW Pretreatment Program or to include a compliance schedule for the development of a POTW
Pretreatment' Program as required under Section 402(b)(8) of the Clean dater Art and implementing
regulations ns or by the requirements of the approved State pretreatment program, as appropriate.
section retre ent ror s
Under authority of sections 307(b) and (c) and 40.2(b)() of the CleanWater Act and implementing regulations ns 0
CFR Part 403, North Carolins, General Statute 1 3-215.3 (14) and implementing regulations 15.A ` i CAC 2H
. 900, and in accordance with the approved pretreatment program, all provisions and regulations contained and
referenced in the Pretreatment Program Submittal e an enforceable part of this permit.
e Permittee shall operate its approved pretreatment program in accordance with Section 4 2(b)(S) of the Clean
Water Act, the Federal Pretreatment Regulations 40 CFR Part 403, the State Pretreatment Regulations 15A.
NCAC 2H .0900, and the legal authorities, policies, procedures, and financial provisions contained in its
pretreatment program submission n ` 'lion approved modifications there of. Such operation shall "Delude
but is not limited to the implementation of the following conditions and re itirtmts:
1 e er Case Cyr c U
e Permittee shall maintain adequate. legal authority to implement its approved pretreatment pros
2® ndcxs " l caste e a5
e Permittee shall update its lta us ,ante Survey S) to include all users of the sewer collection
system at least canoe every five years.
3 JjpnjMdugTjw
'The Permittee ,shall implement a Division approved Monitoring Plan for the collection of facility specific
data to be used in a wastewater treatment plant Headworks Analysis A)for the development of
specific pretreatment local limits. Effluent data from the Plan shall be reported on the DMRs (as required
by Part 11, Section D, and Section F.5.)
4 1 l oa `s nal is A Loscsl its
e Permittee shall obtain Division approval of a Headworks Analysis (ffWA)at least once every five
years,required by the Division. Within 180 days of the effective date of this permit (oar any
subsequent permit modification) the Pennittee shall submit to the Division a written technical evaluation
of the need to revise local limits Cie., an updated HWA or documentation of why one is not needed) [40
CFR 122.42). e Permittee wall develop, in accordance 'th 40 CFR 40.5(c) and 15A NCAC 214.0909,
specific Local Limits to implement the prohibitions listed in 40 CFR 4 3:5(a) and (la) and 15A NCAC 2H
.CD(1.
5: Tradox C1ser pretr t F' isslloacatioan'lales
In accordance with NCGS 143-215.1, the Permittee shall issue to all significant industrial s, permits for
operation do n of pretreatment equipment and discharge to the P aittee's treatment works. These permits
shallcontain .'t t oa , sampling protocols, reporting of ' ts, appropriate standard and special
conditions, and compliance schedules as necessary for the installation of treatment and control
l
technologies to assure diat their st ter discharge e eet all applicable pretreatment standards
requirements. Te Pertnittee shall maintain a current Allocation Table (AT) which summarizes the results
of e Headworks AnalysisA) and the limits from all Industrial User Pretreatment Permits (IUP).
Pennitted 1UP loadings for each parameter cannot exceed the treatment capacity of the POTW a
determined by the HWA.
Version 612012003

D ; permit Requirements
Page 15 of 16
6. zto ` tion to C s t _A tee Q
e Permittee shall ensure that an Authorization to Construct it (AtC) is issued to 211 applicable
industrial users for the construction or modification of any pretreatment facility. Prior to the Issuance of
In AtC, the proposed pretreatmetir facility and treatment process t be evaluated for its capacity to
comply with all Industrial User Pretreatment PcTanit ` ita ` ns
7. f `TT99
uct e 'on, s onito " d its Di sion
t of info boss lien b industrialord to det P ypli bie pretr t s e P ttee st:
h t d ins �IUs at lent once per calendar year; and
b ple ai ` t Industrial Us (SI`ls) at least twice per calendar year for all permit-
litnited pollutants, once during the period from januaT 1 through June 30 and once during the
period from July 1 through December 31, except for organic compounds which shall be sampled
once per calendar year;
8. to `anne o
Permittee Shan require u"industrial usersto comply xth the applicable monitoring and reporting
requirements outlined in the Division approved pretreatment program, the industr3es pretreatment Permit,
or in 15A NCAC 2H .0908.
9.' t
e penrattee shall enforce and obtain appropriate remedies for violations of all pretreatment standards
promulgated pursuant to section 307(b) and () of the Clean WaterAct (40 CFR 405 et. seq.), prohibitive
standardsdischarge set forth 40 CPR 403.5 and 15A NC A,C 2H .0909, and specific 10c3l limitInnus-
All
enforcement actions shah be consistentmith the Enforcement Response P ) approved by the
Division.
10. P
P s orr tine acco e t 15 C .0908. In lieuof submitting
ed P g' eloped d 15 C .09 y be
r to set th on p "o ' y'to senforcement` of pretreatment requirements
oth P tr t . pl rati issuesa
For other active pretreatment programs, the Permittee shall submit two copies of a Pretreatment
Annual
Report ) describing its pretreatment activities the `previous twelve months to the Division at the
following address:
C DENK , DWQ Pretreatment Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
C " 799-111
These reports shall be submitted according to a schedule established by the Director and s contain the
following
a. "v
.A brief discussion of reasons , status of, and actions taken for all Significant Ind
ustrial
U (S s) i Significant Non -Compliance (SNC)*
b `t P o P
approved by the Divisiow,
c.
of olatos d the a "ons o p posed to correct the violations on
specific forms approved by. the D...ow,
d) Inclu$trial to S Fo

*' NPDES Permit Reel - f lt:
''age ic, sf 16
Monitoring data from samples collected by Math the POTW and the Significant Industrial
U (S . These analytical results must be reported on Industrial Data Summary Forms
(IDSF) or other specific format approved by theDivision;
e.) Other In -formation
Copies o the P s allocation table, o carmodified'enforcement co ce schedules,
public notice of SIUs in SNC, and any other information, upon request, which in
the
opinion of the Director is needed to determine compliance Uith the Pretreatment
implementation requirements of this permit;
11, Public `notice
e Permittee shall publish annually a list of Significant Industrial Las (SIUs) that were in Significant
Non -Compliance (SNC) as defiried in the 'tt 's Division approved Sewer Use Ordinance with
applicable pretreatment requirements and statidards during the previous elve month period. 's list
shall be published within four on s of theapplicable twelve-month period.
12.
The I2ecard e
Pernaittee shall retain for 2 minimumof three years records of monitoring a " 'ties and results, along
with support information including cards, water quality records, and records of industrial mipact
on the P
13. p d . rt
e pernuttee shall adequate funding and staffing levels to accomplish the objectives of its
approved pretreatment program
1 tics t
Modifications to the approved pretreatment program includingbut not limited to local limits
modifications, PO'JW monitoring of their. , Significant Industrial Us (SIUs), and Monitoring Plan
modifications, be coniidered a permit modification and shall be governed by 15 1' C 1k .0114 and
15A NCAC 2H .0907.,
Version

. . • W . • . ....,:
w
Provided
RemarWo��n
4 M
•-the plans each - •• _ _R 71
i
bility
Engineer°s Certification signed, sealed, and dated by
27
the Engineer Of record stating that the project
El
/
complies with G.S. 133- .
28
Minority Business Farms for Local Government
[
N/A
Projects.
9
Minority Business Guide.
El
N/A
30
dispute Resolution with mediation for Local
�
N/A
Governments.
31
Contract Duration included.
Q
N/A
Projects funded through CG&L must include the
32 ,
Submittal Checklist, found under Plans &
®
N/A
Bpecificiations at.
tt :.// .ncc l.net/Fn ineenn / lans.html

Table No. 1: Outfall 001 Analytical Results
from January 2008 to May 201
Motive enterprises LLG ® Charlotte south Torn"
Out€oll 001
Pa ter
Flow
'TSa
C &G
turbidity
Phenol
Samne,
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Xylene
NaphthaleneBE
ironAlin-ganese
units
MOD
RPn1
PPM
NTU
PPb
Pph
PPb
PPh
PPb
ppb
PPh
PPM
Pennit Unit
45
so
01
1.19
91
1/1/2008
P(irzM
0.3396
7,60
<5.21
24.5
00-3
<1.00
4.15
<1.00
5.20
<5.00
<t,OD
2/M2DOS
0.1297
ail112008
0.2249
6.50
<521
<10.3
<100
<1.00
<1.00
4.00
<5.00
<1.00
3/17/2008
0,2735
4/WO08
0,0039
9,07
<5.21
31,8
<10,5
<100
<1.00
<1A
4.00:
<5.00
<1.00
4/1412008
0.2073
5113/2008
0,1751
2,67
<521
<10.0
<1.00
0.00
<1.00
4.00:
e5.00
<1.00
5/3012008
0.1486
6/2412008
0.0274
3&0
<621
38.3
<10.0
<1:00
<1.00
<1.00
4.00
<5.00
<1.00
7/7/2008
0.6164
7t18/2008
0.0040
<2.00
<6.49
<10.5
<1:00
<1.00
<1.00
4.00
<5.00
<1.00
7129/2008
0.25t0
O08
0,0079
<2.00
<521
<12.5
<100
<1,00
<1.00
4.00
<5.00
<1.00
8/261008
0.1298
902008
02602
400
<521
30.0
<ii.t
<1.00
0,00
<1.00
<3.00
666
5.46
10/l/2008
11/14/
0.2559
133
<6.67
NA
0,00
<1.00
<1,00
4.00
<5.00
12/1012008
0.3684
2,67
<5.62
NA
<11A
<1,00
<1.00
<1.00
<100
<5.00
<1.00
1211112008
0,2135
I Pi 1 212M
0.2675
1/22/2009
0.3244
3.73
<5.43
7,60
<12.5
<100
<1.00
<1.00
4.00
<1.00
5,38
0.497 0,0343
211/2009
3117/2009
0.7106
4,00
<5.49
10.2
<10.0
<1.00
<1.00
0.00
4.00:
<1.00
<5.00
0,284 <0.0150
31 9
0,0764
4/1312009
0,3783
7,07
749
<12.5
<t 00
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<1.00
<5.00
502009
0.2276
3,73
<6,41
<12.5
<1.00
OM<1.00
<3.00
<1.00
<5.00
5/13/2009
0,3591
5122 09
0,2473
662009
5.73
<5.10
12,6
<10.5
<100
<i.00
<1.00
<3.00
0,00
<5.00
602009
0,3243
6/1912
0.1619
7/t5/2009
0,1358
6.33
<&32
400
<10.8
<1110
<1.00
0.00
<3.00
<1,00
7.01
7/3112009
0,2836
&612009.
0,0712
22.3
<6.49
36.9
<10.0
<t 00
<1,00
<1.00
<3.00
<1M
<5.00
8/2Z'20091
0.2014
W1=91
0,1714
9/1
10/8120091
0.2283
<1.05
<5.10
2,60
<10.1
<1.00
<1 M
<1.00
<3.00
<1.00
<5.00
10/2&20091
0.2558
II/WMI
0.1918
52
4,68
17.2
<11.1
0.00
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<1.00
<5,00
11/11/2009
0.3592
1 1123f2OG9
0.2873
1219/2009
0,4324
36.4
<5.49
40
<10.9
<100
<1_00
<1,00
4.00
0.00
<5.00
12(21/2009
OA978
12/2612009
0.3345
1125/2010
0.3737
144
1 <5.75
4.38
<10.3
<100
<1.00
<1.00
4.00
<1.00
5.2
211 10
0,2100
4.5
<5.88
215
<11.8
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<1.00
<5.00
2/1 10
0.5177
2WI2010
0.0820
3/2912040
0,6538
8.24
<6.33
2.64
<1t.8
7100
<1.00
<1.00
4.00
<1.00
<5.00
5i211 010
0.2696
14.5
<&04
27.2
<11.4
<1.00
0,00
<1.00
73.00
0.00
Ava
025M
943
M28
113
-
3.09
Z74
3.73
0 0.0343
Minimum
0.0039
<1.06
< 10
2.50
<10 0
<i 00
<1.00
e1.00
<3.0
<1.00
<1.00
0 <0.0150
x
0.7106
38.00
e6.94
40:00
e1.5
c1
4.15
e1,00
5.20
666
7,01
0.49M 0030

Table No. 2; Outfall 002 Analytical Results from January to July 2009
Mature Enterprises LLC - South Tenninat
Ouffall 002
Parameter
Flow
T3S
0&0
Turbidity
Phenol OTEX Naphthalene
WrSE
Benzene
Ethylbonzene
Toluene
Xylem
Units
moo
Plue
PPM
NTU
PPb, pPb PPb
ppb
PPb
ppb
PPb
PPb
Permit Limn
so
Jan-08
,
Feb-U8 .
-08
c-08
-08
Just-08
0,0060
<4.00
1 <5.21
<100
<1U,U <5,00
<1.00
<1.U0
<1,00
<1,00
<3,00
Ju1.08
Oct-08
11/14/ 008
..:%
1,33
4.67
<5.00
<1,UU
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
Jun-W
Feb-09
;.
Ap
Jun-09
Jill-09
,
A
@. '
.67
Mini
0.
1:88
<2t
<100
c16.6 <.62i
<i.lk!
ct.ttU,
<.Uo
<i.�
c3.00
r+atim+
a.
<4.osi
<6.27
<1:00
<]tt.0 c5.00
<1.Uo
<1.08'
c1.U0
cS.00
<3.00

r
x
Figure.
Motilva Enterpnises
Charlotte tTerminal
Groundwater (from
emediation Pumps
St©rmwater from
ail star Separator 5tor water from Loading Rack
Tank Far
3 Granular Activated
Carbon Units it er Separator
Air Stripper Water
l cul tin Tank
t
Holding
Clarifier
Holding Tank (Tank Outfall 001
Outfall
r } 1 k t t t �
t ti t r, i
v S 3
w Y
t t U u 4 t § 4 s d 1 y ) ,, ..ft { t' x,S. ,.aS'.z.1':., .. ry k... e,.. ,,..x.,.. 'k'� k�"1-f U, � 4 zS}i i� is ki ✓'4 i h{ �i 1 t'Y`: l �;.. } t { 1 k i �� ir,k ~{4'; t'
Units that the facility proposes to permanentlyremove are in red.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 1, 2009
r. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
Subject: Notice of Violation -- Monitoring Violations
Tracking s NOV-2009 T-0134
Motiva Enterprises, LLC South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO 46892
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Watson:
A review of the December 2008 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of
the following parameters:
Outfall Parameter-
Date
Reported Value
Monitoring Requirement
001 Turbidity
12/31/08
None
Quarterly
002 Benzene
12/31/08
Node
Monthly
002 Toluene
12/31/08
None
Monthly
002 Ethylbenzene
12/31/08
None
Monthly
002 Xylene
12/31/08
None
Monthly
002 Oil & Grease
12/31/08
None
Monthly
002 Total suspended solids
12/31/08
None
Monthly
002 Naphthalene
12/31/08
None
Monthly
002 Turbidity
12/31/08
None
Quarterly
002 Phenol
12/31/08
None
Quarterly
002 MTBE
12/31/08
None
Quarterly
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The Division
wr Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the violations are o
cuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial`
ction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. You may
Ms. Marcia Allocco of this toffee for additional information.
nal Office
# Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 7One 1 -1699 t Fax: [phone] Customer'Servi 1-877-623-6748
raterquality.org 1v C? t T s1i 11i1c1

704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
" Robert B.Krebs
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Branch
.A

FFV 1%
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7006 0100 0003 2
September 9, 2009
M. Marcia Alloco
Surface Water Protection
low
ROTIVA
TERPRISES LLO
Division of Water Quality
Y
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE, Notice of Violation — Monitoring Violations
Tracking* NOV-2009-MV-01 34
Motive Enterprises LLC — Charlotte South Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO 6892
Mecklenburg County
i
Gear Ms. Allocor
This letter is in response to; letter from the Division of Water dated August 18, 2009,
regarding the Notice of Violations (NOV)— Monitoring Violations for Motiva Enterprises
Charlotte South Terminal. This NOV is based on a review of the December 2008 self -
monitoring report for our Charlotte South Terminal,
Regarding the December 2008 self -monitoring report for Ou fall 002, please find attached a
''ov of the LISPS of certified mail receipt (70 51160 0001 4318 , 608) for the submittal of
• � s • _�, � • � � is "* •1� • - ., ,_ _ ..
ENTERPRISES
Complex Manager
cc. Charlotte South Terminal Files
Sam Baker « Motiva Greensboro Terminal
Marco A. Zdrate — UPS Corporation
410 Tom Sadler Road, Charlotte, NG 28214 Phone: (704) -1904
Fax: [phone]

7 ?7�
77 777 7�7 777`77'��"�
77 777
2K Rm N M 191 IKE =irl�l 5 M m� Kq =zmfriv-, -n
MEN=
AVZRACYR
T.
"' -�fie�
i9i mg ii

Sm 3, 200 1 t 081?M No, 5247 P. 4
Facility ttattas: (Please ohwk one, of tlxo follso.. ` )
All monitonng data and sampling ftequenciea meet permit requirements ;
compliant
All n-ziitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
t
:If'the facility is noncompliant, please cornment on 00riwtiVo actions b i i* token in yespect to equlprnentc operation. maintenance, eta .,
and a tixrxe table for improvdiments to he made.
HIMEHIMM
submAted zs, to the best nTy knowledge find belief, true, scourate, and'complete, 1 am 4vwo that there are significant penalties for
gals 'ttitagfal e i 6 ` ation, including the p bdity of firms and imprisomnent'for lCr owing violations,"
SN. Baker
J!"O.Weage t or type}
lattlt Of ennati (Date)
(Required)
f'Wtt e �ddi"9: Phone NumberPorrrutlixp, Date
mot i a tei a ,t ®, f cl l e$ li r14 399-33011 1
00010 Temperature 00556 Oil & Grease 00951 Total Fluorido 01067 Nickel
07 Turbidity 00600 Total Nitrogen 01002 Total Arsenic, 01077 Silver
000080 color (R-C7o) 00610 As ra onle Nitrogen 01092 Zinc
00082 Coker ( ) 00625 Totd Xjoldf l 01027 Cadmium 0110S Aluminutu
Nitrogen
00095 Conductivity 00630 Miit ate litotes 01032 blexavalent Chromium 01147 47 'otal Selenium 71990 Fonnaldthydo
00300 Dissolved C7)ygcn 01034 Chromiurn 31616 Pocat CoUrom71 goomorour
to to -80D� 00665 Total Phosphorous 32730 Toad Phonetics 81551 Xyi n*
00340 COD 00724 Cyanide 01037 Total Cobalt 34235 Bonzono
00400 pH 00745 'Total Sulfide 01042 Copper U481 e Toluene
5.30 Total Suspended 00927 Total 14a8mium 010451raan 3 260 NIBAS
Rosiduo 00929 Total Sodium 01051 Lead 39516 PCBs
00545 Settleable Matter 40940 Total Chloride 01062 Molybdenum 50050 Flog ;
Parameter Code may be obtained bye4lling the Point Source d OMPli ore t Unit at (919) 733-508, or by visit`
the Water Quality SeotioWs web site at state. e.t l s and lUdng to the unifa information pages,
Usc 0131Y units designated i11 the MpOrting fs ililys permit for reporting data
*ORC merit visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per t 5A, WCAC 130.0204.
**If signed by other titan the permittee, delegaation of signatory aUthority must be on Me with the state per 15A NCAc 2B- 0506 (b) () (D).

4 s Wil WNEMO
129M ORT INTO WRI WKI Of DEIdaziEzu, - Wn -, =07 im on Al I= INK
In
`. ,a sr,.all ie
HIS may —
10% NO 11111 WINES oil
l.Tk
o- ;
WS WIN AW mill till HOW A9119, 1011", mill IN ON Rill REM! 25911 5W III 5H 20K
����.'* n 11" ++""x zr'�` v4` �i J� •_�i.�, � ,'"�P .w4 = yy��' " ;'*"" 4�? c*r -a u ,� i . a=�« L;'� { '�° ,iu "`' ,}**, oil
�^�'�y gr,� i y i �, d �� 1 1 Y` 'd`wiT " "vA ^w� 11 . �y"E: r�N � ,( y i�' .
R•.* q
w; :'�a M11T#.P��•. ;�.c. � CJ N 0011
± .,X �'y
�. Ot
P" z tA9im' . »i "s. ,s A^t t, f 6 „. }} v, +".r+ may' 1.1 •S 111 yew ,looms . c ..ti �C . �. ate' ^ a r}&w T,'uY'r
•��^An s �. E ROW O
a 91, . a n x
ON ERNE ee ' ;�Sin x
� 8 �. hi" 7�k. x'� .S. � i'MW>y p'w . ",#`;+x �nx .yi ,a sG Y�, .#.. �. F
.,,.s ra. .,.«a° �• 5P` ' Y`` T .., a!& N'.�#}a s#".rt''+Ct , d �' ff", -n�aa . 0,....«.:+.& �,l�#jyru . sit! "AT'"° a � " .gw
T
119111
r waq •E milli.
s a`g ` 11 pill
1111111111
p$ cda4a 1
xk t isj
Y r`^ x": Yy w •.� .^r- tit „' t t ,w 4 a� 9'ti "' r t , ds. 4 . ,�•° ^+r L 7' 4+ki" .^-
.. r �-,• . ,_�; „, ., � , � � _ � .. _. , -.} �'�� ����;`'� a v�.°�s', :... � �. ,,,� � Z7,
tot
NEW
t z � s""�..k„ si:�r C ,f;z a � f r it 4* t 'vi.•r "�i
+� ;•t ^n:. �, fi««. S c �4�.t rro + �,.++,
•r� } # z Ir.' •,.x"a.` c .„�¢T. .•'+.t.L<�`„ Si -»...,waY 3+4T S"�•� + k5,a.f4'`.•"� W.. 71
4s+a,.
<
5 r �
9
:i i,�k :i�.�#�f vk ,«�}t�'°�iY� jt'Ttih 0�9��`'-,� „`+�sr : ak �r,�r i'w";4��,,.x,fi�4� „r'v."Sz�e�,.,Vva,`'rfdt'r "'�"•, a,.?,Sv��fz ,..,T. ,�...k .:w di .a�`�,t�,. .•..y a ,
vMv mett '
a r v+ + + .�, i'4 `"t 4� S.+�z ,� 3 e 4"�tYv.4 a �'t 4.� d�� i"y^• "t�i r`�M120
chilli I i
It
"rt�i.^IA �'.r *, •�°.{+ ?Y yi+ ,"y', '• "•r'Fy.
-W.Al, 1"'M
�� � WW4 �� 2win
Out
it
Ir
ti.. i
CM; axalavoly torte
C Oi Pi dui L L
OT
=

Acid, 241 200� 1 1:115AM Nod J rl I
EFFLUENT
MCHARGE NO. Oft MONTH
P dt( a 14�
CBlTrVWZLAlX)RAT0R=(l)
CUECKMXWORCHASCRANGM
Mail ORIOY)N tee
tTW I I
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER opor Ik Y23 CHARGE) �
A `ni K UM CW MY K NOWLYM
M A" X"�j��]
AR Ix" it T! KAM)t BgtAYW
y° EMI n vicaLITC
x 3€: 3 t v e; l
x3 ? c x g xt"' 'ti,: '� aY e„,?;' a ��,ze: `�t t a�yx�#fr
.tr. x,�ta�s„Yeutaa t kr < �$1�a.rcte .�;.�rt3 dr.�,rs „
d -NOT ' HYRE WERIM MO DGYM Olt ANALYTICALTWrING FOR Tfitt MOM OF (0)CTOBER
14;g.g mw
t r�, ±:� " 7 .§'� .',f.. tn••�a %f... �` 4.`: °"tkfi�`� n a s;�+ir.dt .1 `rs.k�i , •�t���54" s'.�mpk� . �k ,41 y' 't° six,.N, ..�:.'3 °..n.,7#n^�;t•'P"".'ri �* t'.+'S�s. +.� ,..��"F�..r'
11, ? n : b �` •' PP,TM !a R AR : KNEW,
", i,. ..J,;+s 'x.., :�k u } till ..c. ..'`'*"s't,�, *s�• '.« Kt f. .. 4 'r
OP NS ra J• ✓ WE
12
. ,ry
.. „ �',°": # a,,,.. 3^:» , Y..,, Sxxi p'lk 4'�. ''.a"} ,.,.' >.h....ti. �7:y3?'.. .�.. ; �, �._ ✓t ^4.ir'.,..+,'e`. �t..
14 .. 3 . it r y, •w fr:. r r " �,° A.. $# .x :BSc ?',i �� d C� *� �.'`:i,�, t ">4•s:'$"x ,u:0. °xl;'a`rr: a'kn»» , .€«"Y r.... � 4h: a�'t�."� °S,
16
. ,x4x'" «..„.,xrir. ,'@y .a k w . .: .... r ,ra :' aE+. � , :. .+•�`,,,{s. frv."1 .y k.S"a�'
y
1s
'. .,.. +°. a a .'"+}.y ``� *c.c„9.� ;'L:•* 4.1."t�. 'ie,` hx`,.?x L,t 1'.: *a*„ S {r`. ,';rr•. �'h*xiv"; .✓'° ..i r
q.
20
. . r�?" �. `k"r{ � Y�'*�,%��c' e;",. '$ C ' �'� '',$• '� ,*'Y •Fx.t x i�#,xix .:�.i. "xe",.'�x,'�'n':' r. � •4, � n:?� ,'^�4,,, t:43: �"e s .'u...�,
.:c
w
s?"',` i" r%n.ra. + P wa', • ki :
3, :�'� "s Fyt z +;p wi r ° �w° �x,##'3�; x'� :y x � ks � 3'�+x * :v � . e. k` n'� w �`,"'k'� .. � ". �is £ .,4 •..
24
.: ,,;"4++�". x x> rV:, ;x. �:a.'? ?r•. a .rS_.: 'k. x, "&a �.n ...� +r **Hx• ..,.'�a %,.
26
VIM
3 SC xt r $ ,. #' d4f aN`J. a,,,... •,'. Y v gS'+a^°a. _
.Illi ' 4 , r, c� �� . ti 7. x , : #: c w 7 . t s. * i " � , , � - 'k"•
28
ry;' ,a'
AVERAGE rcq•.< 4 Fr». rs a , .� ; ' , a x:1 S: trcr .'Ise'
MAXVKIMI
29Sitl1
4r� i A ��+.�yy3F.�:g Y�?s ...,"Y :. ..� ti .lar{{:'-i � x4yy.. gg��Gpprv« �1`�.r'�g@.iQQR "' '0..'�e��•d q+°SS.fi�'�t�. ��iR�l'k :?3� °f .4Y. . '4M' wP �' i. "�'� a Y .:TMti'E', C a iW.# <',4�^

NPDES Permit No. NCO046892

e P, 3, 2009 1 : OU?M No, 5247 P, 5
E FFLITENT
NPI)L8 PLIM f NO NC40468ft DISCHAROE NO, W 'M0.\Trff DeGambIft- --YFAP-
FACILITY �4AXM 2 t .1 PH'YSICAUCEIMICAL CO=Y mEcKumuRG
0PBRAT0P.rNRE$PQN=J,RCHAkGE(0RC) ORADEX-PiC PROM "T04-4194-2414
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES <1) TESTAMMUCA,
CRECK BOX W ORC W CHANGFI) PRRSON(S) COI.LRCrrNG SAM"&-
JIJ ail ORJOINAL md ONE COPY to,
AM; CWTVALVIM
MI'MON OV'8VATM QVAUTY
1617 MAIL SXRVICE CRSUR R8=0 TOR IN M 1BUR MARGE) DkT9
U��
TMS
RAXMGK NC Z7699-1617 TMIMPORTIS
T C0'V
IPLIT r UZ�
ST
E REST OF MY KNOWLEDG&
12-41-7 -Tgi6— TAW
50050 00630 006S6 0007d 730 40M 4010 N-37-1-81-561
vww 9=U kAR4MITIM CODA ABOV)t
NAMIANDt"MULOW
FIT
Q I ra 0 j
I
A g H
HR& YMM —wa—b mm M" Nw Mvt vam um Va/L U"
EEL m M ME
hit
777 F7 7777 7777 777 Tl
7
777
'R
3 E, MT
- _V', 77'77'7� 7777-7:
10 5.00 14) YES 03694 L67 <103 MA <5.30 <0,504 <0600 -aSZO -1.69 ekS90 <0.500 NA
..... . . .
1 7
41
T2 3—:00 10 NO 0-2675
14
16
%5w,
4 7/11
Eq =22.
20
-rill IMP— =1-10'�NP tvvl =7;-�77T :7-7. '1
��H RE REN IEEE ME mi fiE �M ME aff m �ffi WNK RK
24
26 2i
PRUI,
M ,
7!,g
30
2A7 <#.W NA 3
-1:J0 46�500 <O.S" -�045ZO -,I <#.SPQ NIA
—;­::�— -�7 —Ma 7#:;�
A 3# q
0.3484 6-7 3 _:1520 _ft 69 <0-590 <45"
2.67 <0 933 N4 <3JO <0 500 <0 W <0 Sr# 4 590 <6 NIA
cofil �(cyo b
900thl umit f 7
JDNVQ Form I�M-1 (01/00)

Facility" Stratus: (Please,oheelt one of the following)
All monitering data attd sampling frequencies meet permit requireinents
Compliant
All monitoring data and ampling frcqu=ies do NOT mect permit requirements
N'r,aaicoxnpl.$ t
If the facility is noncompliftat, plea conuneut ou corrective
rscore a0tionalbeing taken ` respect to equiputtrit. opu tabor, mainitentiuce, etc,,
and at' e table for improyentents to bem •-
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this doewrient and all attachments were prepared under my direction or gopervision in raecor
with to systenn designed to assum that qualified personnel properly gates and evaWe the irformolion submitted. Based on ray inq .
of the person n or personswho managed the system, or those persons dimay responsible for gathering the irdormatiori, the inf(ainalion
subnutWI is, to tho best of my knowledge and belief, Im , accurate, and complete, I am aware. that there are sipfficant, penalties for
tubmitting false information; incluJing the possibility offmct and imprisonment for knowing `-,ojaticn,3,,°
Sm� al
Pe ztt' e (f 1 t , e)
Sa ro of e 'tt (Date) , ;
(Required)
PennitteeAddress.0 Phone bca- P it P- . D-att---
Motivatn s,LLC 6851 kreedom Drive, Charlotte, NC 29214 7fl4 399 3 1 /10
00010 Tonxperatom 00556 oil & Orem 00951 Total Mod& 01067 Nickel
00076 Turbidity 00600 TotaiMmgen 01002 Total Arsenio 01077 silver
00082 Color (ADW 0 625 Total Kjoldhal 01027 Cadmium 01105 AluTninutu
Nitrogea
00095 CcAutuotivity 00630 01032 HenvalontchTornium o1147 Xotai Solenium 71880 Formaldehyde
00300 1Jis ved oxygen 01034 Chromium 31616 Fdoal Coliform 71900 Morcauy
00310 BOD, 00665 Total Phoophorous 3 ' 0 TOW Phenolics 51551 Xylono
00340 COD 0 720 Cyanide 01037 "fatal Cobalt :34245 ` Benzene
o ott PH 00745 Total Sulfide 01042 CopW 34491 Toluene
OOS30 Told Suspondsd 00927 Total Magnesium 01045 Iron 3 260 S
Rcsiduc 00929 Total Sodium 01051 Lead - 35516 `CBs
00545 StitficablaMattor OW40 Total Chloride 01062 Moiybdenura 50050 Flo
Parameter Cade asoistancemay be ob6i ed by callingthe Point Source Complianceffinforeement Unit at [phone] or by visi ' g
tho, Watex Quality S ticat's west site at 2 . to d cl 1. S to the 'unirs `itformation paps,
Use only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
*C)RC must visit facilityand docurrientvisitation offaoMty' as required per 15A NCkC G ,o204)4,
s` If signed by other than the pennittee, delegation of signatory authority must bd On gile with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .Ci 06 (b) (2) (D),

P. No, 5247 P 7
EFFLUENT
,eERMTNO. NLW46992 DISCILAROF-90. Dal MOMH Mov&mbor YEAR 2009
Idf'rYXA?vJd ---d—ASS
,-ATZATOR IN PXSp093ML8 —CUARI:�M(OXC) $.ftDjJlf.. --�61K�Flrf--F/C-PHOM 70"94-2314
"C.TRTWW-D LABORATORMS�(I) TEST
C)UCX)ROX LF OAC "S C"N"-D
M141 OJUGINAL wW ONE COPY to,
ATTKs ACEMMALMSS
DWWON OF WATER OVALM
1617 M", SERVICE, cENTIn DATE
RALUGH, XC 276",1617
L
34034 1 34010 34371 SIMI 22417 34696 --FA-24C
00,016 7
PLOW
wy—IF-mi— 0 rARAMETER COM AftOVt
12 w 0 NAME AND MIS UP -LOW
0
Mm timtL ijuL- YJO tjG(L
-rmfs �iGD I;iG/L
7M7
HIE
77 77N 774
t Z r,
9,
A
Ad,��
7--
-;4 SM 10 YVS &765# I-u :�O—mj m,
590 <OA90 NA
7, N, � =71
7L9 77,; 777-� 75, --
20
27:�� 7777
22
2A
El —Z �t
26
2
LLL �iLL 777
30, —
_!_J3
A -1,4J0 -��kSOU <0.600 <0.520 <L68 <0,590 <O.
A
O.V50 133 -cOA33 KA <3-30 -eo�
-�L-5-0 <kS" 'ek"O <1.68 <0,500 <QA90 NIA
3 NA
<OMD <a -MO �0-520 769 690 ZO 590 NIA
so 1.19 11
(01/00)

J, Y Q U ", I : MM No, 5247 P, 8
Facility Status: (Flcase cht(,,k one, of the fbllou�ng)
All monitoring data and sampling fiequencias meet permit requirments
All monitoring data and stunpling frequetioics do NOT meet permit reqviremouts
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please c0lurnent On cOrrecti've actions bCJn8 taken in respect to equipineaL operation, maintenance, tto.,
and a time tAble for improvements to be made�
I onfify� under penalty of law, that t1lis document and all stlar-IMICAts were PrepAx-cd under toy direction orsupervision in accordanco
yvith a system designed to assure that qualified PoIsOwiel Properly Pther and evaluale, the information submitted, Based on my inquiry
of the persorr or persons who maaaged the vystent, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the, information, the information
subitutted is, to the best ofiny knowledge and belief, true, accurate, pjerc� I a 14W i n P i f
and wm ir am that there am a gaffioa t enah ea or
subutitting fialso infbimmtion, including the pomAbility of fules, and impfisomnent fix kuowing violations."
S.W. Baker
or I)Pd)
IMna fP , (Date)
(Required)
Parcait �Exp. Date
mot 3".3301 6130110
00010 Tenveriduro 00556 Oil 01'ease 00951 Total Fluenido 01067 NioW
00076 Turbidity 00600 ToWNItrogen 01002 TotalArsenic 010-17 Silver
00080 color (Pr -CO) 00610 AmmonlaNitrogen 01092 Zinc
00082 Color (ADMD 00625 Total Kjeldhal 01027 Cadmium 01105 Aluminum
Nitrogen
00095 Cividuativity 00630 NitrateA41trites 01032 Hexavalent Chromium 01147 Total Selenium 71880 Fornialdthydo
00300 Dissolved Oxygeri 01034 Cluornium 31616 Facal Coliform 71900 Meroury
D03 10 BODI 00665 Total Phosphorous 32730 Totall"honolics 81551 Xylem
00340 COD 00720 Cyanide 01037 Total Cobalt 3423,5 Bonzcm;
00400 pH 00745 Total Sulfide 01042 Copper 34491 Toluene
00530 Total Suspoaded 00-027 Total �&Snosium 01045 Iron 38260 bMAS
Residuo 00929 Total Sodium 01051 Lcad 39516 PCBs
00545 Sottloahle Matter 00940 'Total Chloride 01062 Mofybdonain 50050 Flow
Parameter Code mistanceinaybe obtained by calling the Point SoOrce Compliaricaffinfoloment Unit at (91,�) 733-50'83 or byvwting
the Water Quality Section's web site at and linking to the units information pagcq�
Use only units designated in the reporting facility,-. pentut for reporting data,
*ORC must visit facility and doeturrent visitation of facility asrequirod per 15A NCAC 8CT,0204,
If signed by other than the permirtM delegation, Of SigMtOtY authority Must b--, on file widt the state per I 5A NCAC 28 �0506 (b) (2) (D)�

NPD�PE&WTX0 NCO046392 DISCIIARGE NO, 001 MONTki Ot#i bor YEAR 2006,... .
FArff,,I'IY N&W 11401TVA INTL,Luc-'au f rBsoum CR i 1- SIB �LL+; -y MUCKLMmmo
CWERATORMUSP014SML'BalAROB(OP-C) AejRP9M_____CkRADg GJUDE 416 PHONE 0 2 ffi#
CM'rWW_DLABORATORMS (1) (2)
CIIECIC ROX Ili ORC AAS CHANG90 [ MSON( ) COLLECTING 3 Is crsl ��4
Mail ORIGINAL and OM COPY too
ATTKI CXNTRAL FILUSt�
0XVISION OF VVATM QUAUfY
i I7 3 C facers c PR Rn OXt IB C) aI
RALEIGH, NC 76 161 7 'B SIGNATUM i C R as I"C3ar AS
fi030 00 3U 8a5fa 4R47d 3x730 34034 3410" i4371 $6S1 2.2411 696 YA 6C
Y{UNIM PAA&MTER CODRABOVE
NANIN AND UNTWORL08y
ag fCI
15
°1 PIDD CIIIf yntxmto,":_
Y7 1OI q,v ti 13 �°
SVy #:,_ , ¢'4 °ii i '" a• 4.e r.,x •z�N �. ,..t*,.wae,,kn# k.,� f r.** , .€ +, � $`
4 "NOT THERE NO)DISCHARGES I39,r ANALYTICAL TE911NG FOR THE MONTH NTH OF OCTOUR
ku.,'3
d'3:v try4rt.w ,'«4'. sj �€a..*''4€df.r
k, ks u 3 ' x . r ✓�,. .:as+N .#,ptk 'w.° 's, R * ' sa•�t '?if w 'a��=,: w,. ,+z t ah4Qs t � •x ^ ';1 � `: k " ,h k'?s:. TM _ a n , »�.... _
#{f,v.n �'a8 ,tx.
.:x
12
a
34
° tY6 W 'F.'#'' `i:: "r'S ,i'ke"ysn i" .;"'« ° �4ty;#" '.,'{', .7 `'J'.F15z 5y. 2Px,( `•,+f,2"g•.F •i4 y .. ^' Nix. J;Y"' , ?'x , ..i'x,'„.:e$r`-. #R.. ' x j.
Ikk,6 � w #;. ,�y +�w, k P yp,.y, ,� C' t ?•�11'" ;h• ^e' ut'',
x.l`% •x`! i.r .?,° i=,'tw, .« t .v a.}tu tk� * .. .. wt r ,` ,e..:r' , uk" ,«�;b�` �'R sF+ r<�'u '`ut .l.,„!i Gsu S,tTMh .s,iti`'
NI,t " 5; ':i. a e `# :vy { �' lY M.e; . x*°','.�.'. or'' a` a7uT; ;Et r'`. . # "} "zee• , e `
Mx � w o.. ,. a 114 ., Ix�
`+""` AJ,k,'.. xr`•c'hc'r :.�# 'at. ;i *'`,',c�: "txYh'n•' . ~t}'' €e�::s"' �3 z,"-".4'&4e �„x ,`'ifd' y, q. '�,;J
22
C` wS cn N< f
': ��t,`�,N •* ,�3�'?•� '�ti f+�•.,.;� xsr'';�. �k H *€'�. �*'�m*X,t�ZakzR±s "L >t€ .S'�'` "�4T,..:�:tr i 3iz !Mi. ''Mt'1. �: i �� ` 4:,:'« .i"P� �� ka s"" ,'^�$,....«V:
•iF,t + « .S{a. ° ": v"! s � r #" }H. ''� 3fi ^'t'i Tf " w.rk .. 1 ` 4g a 4a'r.4 3. i, s� "t"e
y.���,��
B ' w w '' « ,yY+t' "vi ME
�� °t�`"�• 'i'"? $
a y�
'14""3! .vd..,'� i•d:w �"; . , .,.°• �r.; 'i. x'ag#�xk`+'k�. ��'k:� a .. ,.�.,: ° ilk ,4? 4:1 ,:R t'" * #�...,, .+u ev%lEi•� ^^,t ''�
*
'�*.a�y5 #i : +. y'�#i"* y�"Y $✓,.^ wa :E�k{y'* �r'y y�t .t,#. g ¢(»/.? / �+ y qr. 3 , {�+ .,t '.�y4/ �W.` '" }•' ' .`• ''s kz .y c `' ;'uS, «°z". $}
,W&b 'ti m9..R4n 7 ".*.30 "",xAp500 <0A �. 1.46 �.eN6 C .' i�! �L,N*i i 5 �W°t r !... s i .. +.Ar + N? 'd ,^",.•.
Iiht 0,102 4,00 <0. 33 30.0 31s �:0300 <&500 'AS10 <L" 5.46 4.64 NIA
011602 4.00 <0133 30.0 4.30 <0440 e0 o <1.68 S.d6 _66�p NIA
k..s ,. x t z.^ °. r �.�*` i "�z5s ++��` r�'• a"n.P i` 4Pa� 4" ,T°s,'G '*'�p&+'�C.$v.•,'.{ �aCr��" "tb�'� .
�� A�1 $»`Y'."!,p M1?a .{"hl' t+.. �; d *t k..+�j°;'t#a A+a �'*'s�:" • ,.'�. ., `k �°tlF„''s a :v.,:s .n x �t-a. .0 :w, tg � t, �...fp�`
$CAI I.,a$nit 4VS fi 1.1

J, LM s ; uyrtut Pio° 5247 P, 10
l acility Status: (Please check one, of the following)
All monitodng data and sampling frequencies meet pecimt requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling Ikequencies, do NOT meet permit requirements
Ncknoompliant
Ifilic facility is rioncompliarit, plosse comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipracal, operation, maintenanoe. etc,,
d a time Table for iinprovoinents to 6e sc .
"I certify. under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments werc prepared raider my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified peasonnel properly gather and 6valuate the inforrustionsubmifted. Based on my inquiry
of the person or pemns who managed tlae system,or these persons ditectly rftponsible for gathering the information, the mfomatiou
submitted is to the Best of my knowledge and belies trac, aceirrate, and complct& l am aware that their are significant penalties for
submitting false infomiation,moluding the possibilityr;bffines mid irriprisomneut for knowing violations."
Baker
eel i ease l pot
Mate)
(Requi ee l
Pert lit Address: Phorsc N bdr: Pea wit x e l ato
meaty m llatC+f4 git14133t1 tit310
00010 Tomperfitum 00556 Oil & (Irease 00951 Total Fluoride 01067 Mokol
00076 Turbidity 00600 Total Nitrogen 01002"'fatal Arsenic 01077 Silver-
00080 color (Pt -co) 00610 AmmonlaNitrogon 01092 Zinc
00082 Color (AM4 0062S Total Kjolc hall 01027 Cadmium 01105 Attsssriscum
Nitrogen
00005 c4nduet"svity 04 Witrat trues 01032 HomvalentChromium 01147 Total L-1 nitim 71890 Formaldrhyde,
0300 Dissolvtd Oxygen01034 Chromium 5 616 Fool Wilson 71900 Mcreary
00310 130% 00665 Toftl l'hoRp oresctg 3 730 Total Phenolics 91551 Xylene-
340 COD 00720 Cyanide 01037 Total Cobalt 34235 flonzaare
00400 pH 0 745 Total Sulfide 01042 Coppor 34481 Toluene ;
00530 Total u"ndecl 00927 Total Magnesimir 01045 iron 38260
Residue 00929 Total Sodium 01031 UAd 39516 PCBa
00545 Settleable Matter 00940 Total Chloride 01062 molybdenum $0050 Flow
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Point 8=60 COMpliance/Briforeement Unit at 91) 733-5083 or by visiting
the Water Quality e tion!s web site at l o.easr.stat .rt :u /W s andlinking to the is information pages,
Use only units designated in the reporting facility$s permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document vi&itatiott of facility arc required per ISA XCAC 80,0204.
lfatgned. by other then the perwittee, delegation of signatory author ty must be on file with the slate per 15 A MC:AC 7B .t1506 ) () (D)-

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division f Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Cohen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 18, 2009
Mr. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Tarn Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LL
South. Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO0 6892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Watson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted
at the subject facility on July 27, 2009, by Ms. Erin Fall of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement
between. Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. Please provide the facility's Operator
in Responsible Charge with the findings of the inspection by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) due to the deficiencies with regard
to the subject permit as detailed under the Permit and Self Monitoring Program sections. It is
requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by no later than September 18, 2009,
addressing the deficiencies noted in of the report. In responding, please address your comments to the
attention of Ms. Marcia Alloccd at the letterhead address. Additionally, please send a copy of this
response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle ofMCWQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202,
,
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or any other matters please do not hesitate to call Ms. Alloco or me at this
Office.
Sincerely,
form Robert B. Krebs, Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Mooresville Regional office One
Location: 616 East Center Ave Suite 341, Mooresville, NC 28115
olp� ic�� �i ICIi�
Phone [phone] t Fax [phone] k Customer service; 1-877-623-674 �

'orApproved
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code
NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5
NC0046892 09/07/27 C C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days
Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
........Reserved............
0.5
4 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
10.00 am
June 1, 2006
Motiva Enterprises, LLC.
Exit Time:
Permit Expiration bate:
Charlotte South Terminal
11:05 am'
6851 Freedom Drive
Date.
June 30, 2010
Charlotte, NC 2814
July 27, 2009
Name(s) of tin -Site Representatives ------- Title(s)--- ---- Phone No(s):
D. Scott Dilling
Terminal Operator 919-36-8341
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title:
Mr. Ken Watson
Carolina Complex Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Phone No
Contacted?
410 'Tom Sadler Road
(7{}4} 399-1904
Yes
Charlotte, NC 28214
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit
M Flow Measurement Z Operations &r Maintenance
[l Sewer Overflow
® Records/Reports
Z Self -Monitoring Program ® Sludge Handling/Disposal
E] Pollution Prevention
Z Facility Site Review
[ Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program
E] Multimedia
Z Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory ® Stor water
El Other:
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone-
Date:
Erin. Hall
MCWQP/[phone]
August 3, 2009
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office:
Date:
NCDENR -- Division of Water Quality
Marcia Allocco
Surface Water Protection — Mooresville Regional Office
August 18,' 2009

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected July 18, 2008, by Ms. Erin Hall of the Mecklenburg County
Water Quality Program (MCWQP), A Compliance Evaluation Inspection/Notice of Violation report
was issued on August 14 2008.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on June 1, 2006, and expires on June 30, 2010. The
permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater from Outfall 001 and treated groundwater and truck
loading rack star water from Outfall002,
The treatment works for Outfall 001 consist of containment basins surrounding the
aboveground storage tanks. Stormwater is held in these basins until a visual inspection is completed
and documented, then it is manually released. The treatment works for Outfall 002 consist of
groundwater remediation system. The system includes a series of recovery wells, an oil/water
separator, dual particulate filters, two carbon vessels in series, a five -tray air stripper, a catalytic
oxidation system, flocculation tank, clarifier with overflow weir, and final holding tank. The permit
appears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
The certification classification. for NC0046892 requires that the facility have an operator in
responsible charge (ORC) with a Grade I Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System (PC-1)
certification. The facility is not staffed (?RC and back. -up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification.
The ORC designated for the Motiva Enterprises, LLC Charlotte North Terminal (Wayne
Caudle) is invalid as noted in the DQ compliance database because he has not paid his certification
renewal fees for 208 which were due on January 1, 2009, In addition, the Back-up CRC is being
listed as the ORC ion the front of the DMRs submitted for the Motiva'South 'Terminal. This does not
match the ORC designation information that the Division of Water Quality has on file (Caudle ORC,
Dilling - rack -up {SRC): Please ensure that either the designated ORC becomes valid or another
valid ORC is designated for the facility. If documentation has previously been submitted to the
Technical Assistance Unit changing the ORC designation, please provide a copy to the
Mooresville Regional Office so we can assist in updating the information in the compliance
database.
It is the responsibility of System Owners for classified water pollution control systems to
designate operators (Operator in Responsible Charge and at least one back-up operator) certified by
the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission of the appropriate type and
grade for the system as per 15A NCAC 8G.0201 (Responsibilities of System Owners) and the standard
conditions ofNCt04682.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period .Tune 2008 through. May
2009 Copies of DMRs and effluent analytical results are readily available at the site.

as
ged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution. The facility has
(possibly three) tanks to ethanol. In addition, the facility has plans to
sy over the truck loading rack.All of the major components of the facility
.rvice and appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
V V l 1J Gil:4+V111�.111 L1G41 U,> 1116 all 11V YY 111V GVA . t Al%, 11U Yv
S. Flow from. Outfall 002 is measured by calculation of
auging tables, as allowed by permit conditions.
[:
rrarintl Trrrrr> ?t)OR thrnrrrrh' Maur'?f)OQ Thy n-nnrt-, indicnte-. that
for the effluent from 0utfall 001 for turbidity during the fourth
n
December 2008 reporting on the
ylene, oil & grease, total suspended
zol, and MTBE (quarterly) as required
.taring Requirements, These
f Water Quality through the issuance
iva Enterprises, LLC South Charlotte
henol (single compound) on a
3 34694 (Phenol, single compound).
has shown that the effluent was
le). All future reporting of the
1) analyses, not total phenols.
for many of the parameters on
nitoring result. The permittee must
nit that is below the corresponding

permit limit:. Therefore, a numerical value must be entered for each monitored parameter. If the
parameter was not detected above the minimum detection limit then a "<" and the corresponding
detection limit must be entered on the DMR (i.e. < 1.0 �ig/L). However, reviewed DMRs from August
2008 through. May 2009 show that the pennittee properly entered parameters by rising "<" with the
corresponding detection limit:
The facility's Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period June 2008
through May 2009 during the inspection. Before issuing the inspection report the Mooresville
Regional Office also completes a file review. The review found that the Division ofWater Quality
compliance monitoring database had flagged the Motiva Enterprises South Terminal for
multiple monitoring and reporting violations since issuing the last compliance evaluation
inspection. The compliance system generates violations after the data from your monthly Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) have been entered and compared with the requirements of your permit,
NC0046892.
The violations generated by the D'Q database are periodically uploaded into the EPA
Enforcement and Compliance Oversight database. A review of the compliance summary data for the
Motiva South facility shows that it is listed as non -compliant for 8 of the last 12 quarters as of the first
quarter of 2009. Your compliance data can be viewed at
htt ://vvwiv,, a-echo.,4ov/c i-bin/ etIcR.c ort. 2i?tool=ecbo&IDNumber--1 10009719974
The following information details the violations flagged by the Division of Water Quality database
and transferred to the EPA.
A physical review of the submitted DMRs shoved that phenol is being reported and/or
monitored correctly as per the permit requirements. The monitoring requirements in NCO046892
require Motiva Enterprises, LLC South Charlotte Terminal to monitor the effluent from Outfall 001
for phenol (single compound) on a monthly y basis and from Outfall 002 on a quarterly basis. The
correct EPA reporting code for phenol, single compound is 34694. However, a review of DMRs front.
June 2007 through June 2009 showed that the concentration of phenol in the effluent was reported
under parameter code 32730 (Phenolics, total recoverable). Since no analytical results have been
attached to the DMRs for the review period this Office is unsure whether phenol or total recoverable
phenolics have been analyzed on the effluents front.. the South Terminal facility. Please review with
your contract laboratory that phenol (single compound) is analyzed on your effluent and change
the EPA PCS code on your DMR to match the code required for reporting phenol (34694).
Monitoring violations were also flagged for the following parameters over the review
period: benzene,'ethylbenzene, naphthalene, oil & grease, total suspended solids, toluene,
turbidity
, and xylene. ' The monitoring violations were generated because a value of "ND" or "non -
detect" was entered for these parameters on DMRs from October 200 through July 2008.; "ND" is not
a valid monitoring result. The pernfittee must show that they analyzed the required parameters at a
detection limit that is below the corresponding permit limit and therefore, a numerical value must be
entered for each monitored parameter. If the parameter was not detected above the minimum
detection limit then a "<" and the corresponding detection limit must be entered on the DMR (i.e. <
1.0 µg/L). However, reviewed DMRs from August 2008 through December 2008 show that the
permittee properly entered parameters by using "<" with the corresponding detection limit.

s with Test America (

M TIVA
ENTERPRISES L.L-r—
CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 2760 0003 8369 0173
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
September 10, 2008 RECEIVED
s. Marcia Allocco
Surface Water Protection S E P 21 0
Division of Water Quality
10 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Notice of Violation M-Surface Water Protection
Tracking No. NOV-200-PC-0588
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO0468 2
Mecklenburg County, N
Dear Ms. Allocco:
This letter is in response to Mr. Robert Krebs letter concerning the Notice of Violations (NOV) for
Motiva Enterprises Charlotte South Facility. Motia personnel have instructed the Test America to
perform the phenol (single compounds) analyses instead of total phenols. The revised Discharge
Monitoring Reports (D s) will be submitted under separate cover once all signatures are obtained.
Ifyou 'have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC
Til J. Norman,
Field Environmental Coordinator
Cc: Mr. Rusty Rozzelle
M:CQC3
700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 20
Charlotte, NC 28202
Kenneth Watson - Motiva Enterprises

IV'
08 Tf2008 1417 19197330059 PERCS PAGE 01/03
C;sf 7�t1 Alf IV AM www.>nrc. arse. MAI Attn: tags X of 8¢
NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER 1-800-484-8802
***GOVERNMENT USE ONLY***GOVERNMENT USE ONLY**
Information released to a third party Shall Comply with any
,applicable federal and/or estate Freedom of Information and Privacy Laws
Incident Report # 881981
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
*Report Makers by., CIV ANTONAY GREER at 11a O?" an 7-AU-08
Incident 'Type; STORAGE TANK
Incident Cause: NATURAL PHENOMENON
Affected Areas '.
Incident was discovered on 27-AUG-08 at ti c 30 local incident time.
Affected Medium; LAND /GROUND
REPORTING PARTY
Nam KEN ;WATSON EXT. 03
Organi ation: MOTIVA ENTERPRISES ('
Address- 5831 FREEDOM OR. t1
CHARLOTTE, NC 28214
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES reported for the respona ble party.
PRIMARY Phone: [phone]'
Type= Of Organization: PRIMATE ENTERPRISE
SUSPECTED RESPONSIBLE PARTY
Name: KEN 'WATSON 4EXTM 03
Organization: MOTI'VA ENTERPRISES
Address 5831 FREEDOM DR.
CHAR-LOTTE, NC Z8214
PRIMARY Phones (704)3991504,
INCIDENT LOCATION t
58SI FREEDOM OR. County; MECKLENBURG
City; CHARLOTTE State: NC Zip: 28214 �
RELEASED MATERIAL(S)`
CHRIS Code: OUS Official Material Name, OIL: DIESEL
Also Known AS:
Oty Released; 1000 GALLON (S)
DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT k
CALLER IS REPORTING THAT DIESEL DISCHARGED FROM A; STORAGE TANK DUE
TO THE TANK OVERFLOWING. CALLER STATED TH,
INTO THE TANK AND INCREASED THE AMOUNT CAI
SENSITIVE
INCIDEN
Description of Tank.
Tank Above/Below Ground,
ABOVE
Transportable Container:
YES
Tank Regulated. UNKNOWN
Tank Regulated By:
Tank ID- 90
Capacity 0f Tanks 400 BARREL(S)
Actual Amount:
T DETAILS
rx"a. M wry a ere uu 0 rum s
;ING THE OVERFLOW.
:ON

08/27/2008 14:17 19197330059 PERCS
4-A, 10 An WWW- fit V- k(liVY. 011 ALtnr PA49 2 or a
IMPACT
Fire Involved; NO Fire Extinguished: UNKNOWN
INJURIES: NO Hospitalized. Empl/Craw,, Passenger:
FATALITIES: NO rmpl/Crew., Passenger.- Occupant.
EVACUATIONS: NO Who Evacuated; Radius/Area:
Damages: NO
Hours Direction of
ClOSure Type Description of Closure Closed Closure
Air:
Road: N Major
N Artery:N
Waterway:
N
Track:
Environmental impact, NO
Media Interest: NONE Cs mmunity Impact due to Material:
REMEDIAL ACTIONS
OSRO ONSTTF WITH ABSORBENTS APPLIED
Release Securedt YES
Release Rate:
Estimated Release Duration;
WEATHER
Weather: OVERCAST, 7611F
ADDITIONAL AGENCIES NOTIFIED
Federal- NONE
State/Local: NONE
State/Local on Scene: NONE
State Agency Number-, NO REPORT #
NOTIFICATIONS SY NRC
OUT CRISIS MANAGEMENT CENTER (MAIN OFFICE)
27-AUS-08 11:16 (202)3661863
U. S. EPA IV (MAIN OFFICE)
(404)6SO4955
U�S. EPA IV (NC/SC INCIDENTS)
27-AUG-08 11:16 (404)6504955
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (MAIN OFFICE)
87-AUG-08 11,16 (800)6347084
INFO ANALYSIS & INFRA PROTECTION (MAIN OFFICE)
87-AUG-08 1.1-10
NC DEPT OF EMERGENCY M5MT (MAIN OFFICE)
27-AUG-08 11; 16 (800)8580360
NC OCCUPATIONAL ENVMTL EPIDEMIOLOGY (COMMAND CENTER)
. 27-AUG-08 11, 16 (919)'7075950
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COORD CTR (MAIN OFFICE)
87-AUG-08 11:16 (20e)2829201
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COORD CTR (INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION)
27-AUG-00 1116 (aO2)28RQ20l
NOAA RPTS FOR NC (MAIN OFFICE)
e7-AUG-08 11-16 (206)5264911
SC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DIVISION (MAID{ OFFICE)
27-AUG-08 11:15 (903)7378500
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DENR (MAIN OFFICE)
27-AUG-08 11:16 (919)7335003
SC DEPT OF ENV CNTL ATTN: ERS (MAIN OFFICE)

IV
08''27l2008 14:17 19197330059 PERCE PAGE 03/03
t? f 7 /17ft it to AA o..aws »rc. s cr_g. w 2 t nm e a e 3 af 3 #187 r1 r
27-AUG-0 I2a ls: (808)e536488
AQUITIONAL, INFORMATION
NO AnuITIONAL -INFORMATION.
*** ' ENO INCIDENT REPORT #881 61
Report any problems by calling 1-900-4 4-8802
PLEASE 'VISIT OUR WE0 SITE AT http: //www, nrc. urcg, mil.

;J C: William G. Ross Jr., Secreta
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resourh
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 14, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 70071490 0004 4509 6024
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. den Watson, Carolina Complex Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking # NOV-2008-PC-0588
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO04 892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Watson.
On July 18, 2008, Ms. Erin Hall of the Mecklenburg County Water (duality Program
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as :part of a
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water
Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued as a Notice crf Violation because of the findings noted under
the Operations and.. Maintenance section of the enclosed report. It is requested that a written
Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, C 28202.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Ms. Alloeco or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
fog" Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
ATANOo"rthcarolina
DENR 11V t r llill
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: mEnny_nc vateraualit .oru 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville: NC 28115 Fax 704=663-6040 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Raper

Mr. Ken Watson, Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Motiva South Terminal CEI, Page 2
August 14, 2008
Enclosure
cc. Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Jill Nonnan, Motiva Enterprises LLC
1717 — 6 I't Avenue, North
Nashville, TN 37209

V,
Section A: National Data System Coding
—1
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCO046892 08/07/18 C C
2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenbur County Water 9)yLalk Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
.....::....Reserved............
1.5 2 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date.
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
9:00 am
June 1, 2006
Motiva Enterprises, LLC.
Exit Time:
Charlotte South Terminal
12:15 pro
Permit Expiration Date:
6851 Freedom Drive
Date:
June 30, 2010
Charlotte, NC 28214
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------- Title(s) -------- Phone No(s):
Scott Dilling Terminal Operator [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title:
Mr. Ken Watson
Carolina Complex
Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Toni Sadler Road
Phone No.
Contacted?
Charlotte, NC 28214
(704) 399-19104
Yes
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
N Permit Z Flow Measurement Z Operations& Maintenance
El Sewer Overflow
Z Records/Reports Z Self -Monitoring Program Z Sludge Handling/Disposal
El Pollution Prevention
ED Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules El Pretreatment Program
El Multimedia
El Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory 9 Storrnwater
Other:
Section D. Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
Erin R. Hall
MCWQP/[phone]
August 4, 2008
S* nature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office:
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
Date-
fl I _--� I
Marcia Allocco
Surface Water Protection — Mooresville Regional Office
August 13, 2008
ions Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The Facility was last inspected July 27, 2007, by Ms. Olivia Edwards of the Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A (compliance Evaluation Inspection report was
issued on August 14, 200T
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on June 1, 2006, and expires on June 30, 2010. The
permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater From Outfall 001 and treated groundwater and
truck loading rack stormwater from Outfall 002.
The treatment works for Outfall 001 consists of containment basins surrounding the
aboveground storage tanks. Stormwater is held in these basins untila visual inspection is
completed and documented, then it is manually released.
The treatment works for Outfall 002 consists of a groundwater remediation system. The
system includes a series of recovery wells, an oil/water separator, dual particulate filters, two
carbon vessels in series, a five -tray air stripper, a catalytic oxidation' system, flocculation tank,
clarifier with overflow weir, and final holding tank. The permit appears adequate for the waste
stream being treated.
The certification classification for NCO046892 requires that the facility have an operator
in responsible charge (ORC) with a Grade I Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
(PC-1) certification. The facility is staffed (ORC and back-up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification.
CO 7 PO T :
Discharge Monitoring Reports (D Rs) were reviewed for the period July 2007 through
May 2008.i Copies of effluent analytical results are readily available at the site. All reviewed
records, reports, and logs were clear and maintained.
FACILITY SITE VIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution. Per Ms. Jill
Norman, Environmental Engineer for Motiva Enterprises, the facility will be converting one tank
to ethanol in late 2008.
All of the major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.

VI.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Greek, a Class -lV waters of
the state in the Catawba River Basin. The facility was not discharging at the time of the
inspection. No visual problems were observed within the outall area.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 001 is accomplished using an in -line flow meter. The flow
meter was calibrated in November 2007. Flow from Outfall 002 is measured by calculation of
discharge duration and site -specific ;gauging tables, as allowed by permit conditions.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
D Rs were reviewed for the period July 2007 through May 2008. The reports indicate
that the facility was meeting permit effluent limits during this period.

numerical value.
LABORATORY:
The perrmttee contracts with "Pest America (NC Laboratory C
perform all chemical analyses specified in the permit and with E.T.T.
Laboratory Certification # 022) to perform the Acute Toxicity testing
Neither Test America, Inc. nor E.T.T. Laboratories, Inc. was evaluate
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
bypasses of treatment facilities. Additionally, the ]
regarding the appropriate clean up of the spilled rr
Pursuant to Fart II, Section C, Item. 4, par
bypass from a treatment facility is prohibited, ho
permittee must submit notice within 24-hours as s
Pursuant to Part II, Section E of your NPI
;1
A instead of a
e
ativ
rater
699)
the
L' be
.iTl

{ \ Jlly'Michael F.. ; Governor .
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 14 2007
Mr. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO0468 2
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Watson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on July 27, 2007, by Ms. Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg
County rater Quality Program (MCWQP), This inspection was conducted as part of
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water
Quality. Please provide the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge with the findings of the
inspection by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) due to the deficiencies with
regard to the subject permit as detailed under the Permit and Self Monitoring Program
sections. This Office commends the pe ittee's'efforts to ensure compliance with the permit
limits and encourages the use of process control to aid in this process. However, the effluent
samples collected for compliance with the permit must be representative of the discharge event.
Please see the Self Monitoring Program section for more information on this requirement.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by no later than
September 10 2007, addressing the deficiencies noted in of the report. In responding, `please
address your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Alloc o at the letterhead address.
Additionally, please send a copy of this response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle ofMCWQP at700 N.
Tryon Street, Suite 205 Charlotte, NC 2822.
APANurthCaroIina
Ur
NCDENR 'a
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: 4 `4 4 r ,, +x r pia al ,t _{ rr 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Clpportunity7Atfinnalive Action Employer - 50% Recycletl110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Ken Watson
Notice of Deficiency
CEI at Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Page 2
IVFVLt, %J1 "Lly vul%'l 111a4M,13 UV I'M IlUbIMM LU UU11 IVES. 1AI10i;CU Of 1110 UL
this Office.
Sincerely,
A
ta Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
RBK/qjh
WC Motiva.0046892.0707

Section A: National Data Sstem Codm
Transaction Code
NPDES Permit No. YRIMO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5
NCO046892 07/07/27 C C
2
Remarks:
Ins ne tor: Mecklenbug �Count �y�) !jty Program
Inspection Work Days
Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
..,....,,..Reserved....
0.5
4 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility
Inspected:
9:00 am
June 1, 2006
Motiva Enterprises, LLC.
Exit Time:
Charlotte South Terminal
9:45 am
Permit Expiration Date:
6851 Freedom Drive
Date:
June 30, 2010
Charlotte, NC 28214
July 27, 2007
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------- Title(s) ---- — -- Phone No(s):
Scott Dilling
Terminal Operator 704-394-2314
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title:
Mr. Ken Watson
Tenninal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Phone No.
Contacted?
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte, NC 28214
[phone]
Yes
1
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit
Flow Measurement Z Operations & Maintenance
D Sewer Overflow
Records/Reports
Z Self -Monitoring Program Z Sludge Handling/Disposal
D Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review
0 Compliance Schedules 0 Pretreatment Program
D Multimedia
Ufluent/ke�eiving Waters 23 Laboratory 2 Stormwater
0 Other -
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of lospector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
MCWQP/[phone]
August 7, 2007
Olivia J. Hutchins
,
Sinature of R viewer� '
_,
Agency/Office:
Date-
�M
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
Marcia Allocco
Surface Water Protection — Mooresville Regional Office
August 13, 2007
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected March 20, 2006, by Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was
issued on March 28, 2006.
PERMIT:

FACILITY SITE VIEWS
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution. All of the
major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared to be operating
properly at the time of the inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, a water body classified as
WS-IV waters within the Catawba River Basin. The facility was not discharging at the time of
the inspection. No visual problems were observed in the receiving stream.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 001 is accomplished using an in -line flow teeter. flow
from Outfall 002 is measured by calculation of discharge duration and site specific gaining
tables, as allowed by permit conditions:
$ELF -MO ITO NG PROGRAM:
DMRs were reviewed for the period June 2006 through May 2007. The reports indicate
that the facility was meeting permit effluent limits during this period and no permit violations
were noted
However, a discrepancy was noted on multiple UMs regarding the reporting of flow and
other effluent characteristics as required for NCO046892. The permittee is reporting the
concentrations of total suspended solids, oil and grease, phenol, etc. can days when no flaw is
being reported. This does not meet the requirements for effluent monitoring as stated in
section A. (L) of NCO046892 as effluent discharges must be monitored for all required
parameters. Effluent sampling must be conducted during a representative discharge event.
The permttee may pull a process control sample from the final retention basin t
determine compliance with the permit limits before any effluent is discharged from the facility.
However, when the effluent from the final retention basin is discharged it must be monitored for
all effluent characteristics listed in section A. (L) of the permit and reported on the
corresponding DMR for that day of discharge. This grab sample as detailed in "Part 11 of
NCO046892 Section A. Definitions" must be representative of the discharge.
L t TORY.
The permittee contracts with Prism Laboratories, Inc. (NC Laboratory Certification#
402) to perform all chemical analyses specified in the permit and with E.T.T. Laboratories, Inc.
(NC Laboratory Certification # 022) to perform the Acute Toxicity testing specified in the
permit. Neither Prism Laboratories, Inc nor with E.T.T. Laboratories, Inc. was evaluated during
this inspection.

'144
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE.
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained. All components of the
treatment system are inspected daily.
SLUDGE HANDLING/DISPOSAL
The oil/water separator is pumped out on an annual basis or as needed by US Filters. The
carbon filters used in the series carbon vessels are replaced as needed and disposed of by U
Filters.

Water Pollution ControlSystem Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A:08G .o20>i
General Information:
Permittee Owner/Officer Name:
Mailing address:
City: State: Zip:
Telephone Number _} Fax Number ( "
Signature: Efate:
Facility Information.
Facility Name:
Permit Number: County.
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE OF SYSTEM!
Mark e of Facility Grade MarklXLlype of Facility
Wastewater Plant Spray Irrigation
Physical/Chemical Land Application
Collection System
Operator in Responsible Charge:
Print Name:
Certificate Type and Grade: Certificate
Work Telephone. ( Signature:
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge
Print Name.
Certificate Type and Grade. Certificate #:
Work Telephone. ( Signature:
Mail or Fax to: WPCSOCC
68 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 2 699- 18 Fax:"919/733-1338

tipt Michael F Easley„ Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
_ t t'
seas trr 4UaC ij(�"n,��
# ,J ,
August 17, 2006
S.W. Baker
Motiva Enterprises LL-Charlotte South AUG 18 da
6851 Freedom Drive
Charlotte, NC; 28214
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report NCO046892WA
i,> . ,.��-fig g
Dear Permittee:
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (D ); from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
into the Division's database. Our data entry staff has informed me of problems with your recent DMR
submittal. Until these problems have been corrected, your DMR will be considered incomplete. Please
see the attached form along with a copy of the problem DUR for details regarding the DMR.'s deficiency.
Incomplete or illegible DNMs affect our staff s ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation of DMR
submittals. Please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with your NPDES permit and 15A NCAC 02B .0506, and you may be subject to further
enforcementaction. Please take the necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
Attention.: Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 2 699-1617
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs, please contact Michele Phillips at 919-733-5083 Ext. 534 ' Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely, `
Michele Phillips
cc:
Central Files
o c C Tina
M C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Phone. [phone] Customer Service
tntemet: hftp,,/Vo.enr.atate.nc.us o.enrstate.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 17= [phone] 1-877-623-6748
An Equal pportunitytAffirmatiwe Action Employer

Jnits of Measure have been emitted or ar(
Monitoring Report
e
i DMR. as incomplete due to the
re attached DMR for details)
points have been omitted
icorret
t. .a, s •t
1 be 34030 (Benzene), 34010 (Toluene) and 34694 (Phenol, single compound).
inform this office if the analytical method used was indeed what you reported or if
a actually analyzed for the codes our database shows. If the latter is correct please
f your form template with the correct code and resubmit per the enclosed letter.

pppppp, NT
PFRARM40. N 6"2 DIS94ARGENO. 001 MONH kj
PRIM .� }
(SIGNAlm
�
Byrl
x
r
f
r .. m
-
, ate..
�....®.M . L M
"
,dw.
1, / .J
mum
..X
•
In ME
EMEMEWERNMEMBE
Boom
Imm
memm-
-
El mMum
a
ommmommmommomm
MIN
I Do I
INC

FV 0 6 WATT
( Neches! F. Easley, Govor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(9 `C Alan W. Klintek„ P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March :, 200
r. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motiva enterprises, LLC
410 Tarn Sadler Read
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises,`LLC
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NC004892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Watson. ;
In March 20 2006 s. Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative
working agreement between Mecklenburg lenb County and the Division of Water Quality, The enclosed
report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not hesitate to
call Mr. John Lesley or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
*. }. Res Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection. Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc Rusty Roelle, MCWQP
DRG/ojll
WQ Motiva.0 46892.0 0E
No hCarolina
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Witter Quality Phone [phone] Customer "service
Internet: fev a sts � aierc eta[it_ or 610 Past Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% ftecycled(10% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460 Form Approved
4% tj NPDES Compliance Inspection Report ffl__1KWA OMB No. 2040-0003
V, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Approval Expires
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office N DEN- 7/31/85
Section A: National Data S stem Rodin
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCO046892 06/03/20 C C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Me"Ienburg Count Water unlit Pro ram
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA ....Reserved.,.......
0.4 4 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time: Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected: 9:20 am September 1, 2001
Motiva Enterprises, LLC. Exit Time:
Charlotte South Terminal 9:50 am Permit Expiration Date:
6851 Freedom Drive Date: June 30, 2005
Charlotte,'NC 28214 March 20, 2006
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------- Title(s) -------- Phone No(s):
Wayne Caudle Terminal Operator 704-394-2314
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title:
Mr. Ken Watson Terminal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC Phone No. Contacted'
410 Tom Sadler Road
C :(:7704) 399-1904 Yes
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
L<j Pe it Z Flow Measurement Z Operations & Maintenance 'Sewer Overflow
Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling/Disposal El Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review El Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program El Multimedia
W%tprz M I nlinrntnmi lzt^r --t- M n+u—
Signature(s) of loSpector( s): Agency/Office/Telephone: Date:
Olivia J. Hutchins MCWQP/[phone] March 28, 2006
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office: Date:
John Lesley DWQ/SWP Mooresville Regional Office March 2 8, 2006
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected June 6, 2005 by Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was
issued on June 23, 2005,
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1 2001 and expired on June 30, 2005
(the facility continues to operate under the constraints of the expired permit), The facility is in
the review process for permit renewal. The permit authorizes the discharge of storm water from
Outfall 001, as well as the discharge of treated groundwater and storm water from the truck
loading rack from Outfall 00.
The treatment works for Outfall 001 consists of containment basins surrounding the
above ground storage tanks. Storm water is held in these basins until a visual inspection is
completed and documented, then it is manually released.
The treatment works for Outfall 002 consists of a groundwater remediation system. The
system includes a series of recovery wells, an oil/water separator, dual particulate filters, two
carbon vessels in series, a five tray air stripper, a catalytic oxidation system, flocculation tank,
clarifier with overflow weir, and a final holding tank.
The permit appears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period May 2005 through
February 2006. All reports are properly completed. Copies of effluent analytical results are
readily available at the site. The Terminal Operator maintains organized records, logs and
documentation relevant to the NPDES permit.
FACILITY SITE VIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline d diesel fuel storage and distribution.
All of the major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection. The facility discharges to an unnamed
tributary to Long Creek, which is a Class"W-IV water in the Catawba. River Basin.

EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
in the receiving stream?
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
LM:
ie period May 2005 through Fer
completed and no permit violations were noted.
ATORY.
risen Laboratories, Inc performs chemical analysis of effluent samples (C Laboratory
Lion # 402). E.T.T. Laboratories (NC Laboratory Certification # 022) performs effluent
1xicity testing. Prism and E.T.T. Laboratories were not evaluated under this inspection.
TINS & MAINTENANCE:
he facility and site appeared well operated and maintained.All components of the
system are inspected daily.
E HANDLING/DISPOSAL
he oil/water separator is pumped out on an annual basis or as needed by US Filters. The
[ters used in the series carbon vessels are replaced as needed and disposed of by US

Aim, 0
KIN
NCDENR
North Carolina Department f Environment and Natural Resources
/E�
Division �f Water Ma��
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, RE., Director
July 2, 2005
J:ERTIEIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQLESTE
Ms. Nicola E. Cloutier, Environmental Engineer
Motiva Enterprises,
r rises, LL
�-nt
P.O. Box 2476
Alexandria,, VA 22301
Subject: Notice of Violation - E , uent Limitations
Traeking !#: NOV-2005- V-0
Motiva - Charlotte South Terminal
[DES Permit No. NCO046892
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Cloutier.
A review of the April 2005 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter.
Pim Parameter Rejported Value Limit
001 Total Suspended Solids 59 mg(L 45.0 mg1L FIN
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. - The
Division of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this `and any additional violations. If the
violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operationand/or maintenance problems, and you
anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by
Consent. You may contact Richard Bridgeman of this Office for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Brid eman or
e at 704/663-1699a
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Poirot Source Branch
B
Moomville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 One
Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone] lnte et: h2o.enr.stat .nc.us NofffiCarohna
An Equal Opportun4/Affimrative Action Employer— W/o Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Naturalik

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Ouality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
June 23, 2005
Mr. Ken Watsort, Terminal Manager
Motive, Enterprises, LLC
410 Tom Sadler Road
Charlotte., North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motive Enterprises, LLC
South Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NC O046892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Watson:
On June 6,2005, Ms. Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative
working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of We, Quality. The enclosed
report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at this Office,
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface We, Protection Regional Super -visor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Romelle, MCWQP
DRG/cjh
WQ Motm.0046992.OWS.doc
Mooresville Regional Ofte One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N&thCarohm
Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone] / Internet: h2o.entstate.mus Na&nally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Reryclei:1110% Post Consumer Paper

United States I
N
,«V North Carob;
�.r11,11� Divisic
ital Protection Agency, N
npliance Inspection Repo
rent of Environment and
Quality, Mooresville Re
s .
a
411 I i�i
s t r « « •�
i !!I
-�rr�.�ir t: 1iI� I
t t
p
�
•: � t' R.. to { A
• t
t k A
«
Ewe t t ' t Mt
' •
June 7, 2005
III III
i
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised'3-85) Previous iEditions are Obsolete —

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected May 28, 2004 by James Wilson of the Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was
issued on June 25, 2004.
PERMIT:
The cun-ent permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and expires on June 30, 2005.
A permitrenewal application is being processed. The permit authorizes the discharge of
stormwater from Outfidl 001 and treated groundwater and truck loading rack stormwatex from
OutW 002.
The treatment works for Outfidl 001 consists of containment basins surrounding the
above ground storage tanks. Stormwater is held in these basins until a visual inspection is
completed and documented, then it is manually released.
The treatment works for Outfall 002 consists of a gromidwater remediation system. The
system includes a series of recovery wells, an oil/water separator, dual particulate fters, two
w weir, and final holding tank.
ppears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
to site. The Terminal Operator maintains organized records, logs and
rirelevant to the NPDES permit.
PITE REVIEW:
AJI of the major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection
EFFLUENTIRECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, a Class WS-IV water
within the Catawba River Basin.
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. No visual problems were
observed in the receiving stream

FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for O
last calibrated can November 8, 2
discharge duration and site -spec'
SELF -MONITORING PRO
U were reviewed for
that facility was meeting p
1. a (1 Total' Suspended
maximumitlimit.
der to cover.
Records indicate t all p net
LABORATORY:
Prism Laboratories, Inc
Certification # 402). E.T.T.. Labs
Acute Toxicity to Prism d
OPERATIONS N "E'EN
The and site P
treatment system cted
.

0� A
AMA
NCDENR
North Care
September 9, 20
Nicola Cloutier
Motiva Enterprises LLC
232 Ten Ten Road
Apex, NC 27502
Su
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.; Director
Division of Water Quality
4
tee:
T.._ 'In 'Inns s t rAn t'UD ,
.ter June 30, 2005, the curr,
Renewal Notice
NPDES Permit NC O046892
Charlotte South Terminal
Mecklenburg County
lays prior to expiration of the Curren
cis notice.
Division postmarked no later than
,f at least $500.00. Larger penalties n
es of up to $25,000 per day.
water discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact me at
fisted below. You may also contact the Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 6 3-1699 to beg
closed checklist to complete your renewal package, The checklist identifies the items you mi
Sincerely,
DEFT, r,%�r .
(XRM
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPES Unit
SEP
oral Piles
'll�eionllffzce�at�t 'tySetxort,�
DES File
ak'a.w..
617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina'27699-1617
VISIT US oNTHE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/NPDES
919 733-5083, extension 511 {fax} 919 733-0719
e-mail: [e-mail]

NPDES Permit NCO046892
Charlotte South Terminal
Mecklenburg County
The following items are REQUIRED for A renewal packages:
J A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
I I '. . r t 1\ I I I
Representative. Subriiit one signed original and two C'O'ple's.
• If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to any
such Authorized Representative (see Part II.B. 1 Lb of the existing NPDE S permit).
• A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility: Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies.
The following items must be submitted by any- Municipal or Industrial facilities dischaWjg
process wastewater
industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of the (c)de of Federal
Regulations, Part 122) and ALL Municipal facilities with a permitted flow > 1.0 MGD must submit a
Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21.
The above requirement does NOT apply to privately owned facilities treating 100%
domestic wastewater, or facilities which discharge non -process wastewater (cooling
water, filterhackwash, etc.)
PLEASE NOTE:
Due to a change in fees effective January 1, 1999, there is no renewal fee required with your
application package.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NC DENR / Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

mom
Mr. Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
410 To Sadler Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Corr liar e Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO046892
Mecklenburg County, NC
Mr. Watson:
-pection was conducted as p art of a
County and the Division of Water
Y-
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at thi; Office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
DRG/jpw
WQ Motiva.0046892.0504.doc
,arolina tIMENR
(,rajj!1 Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main street, Moo revilleNC 28115 [phone] Custonxr service
1-877-623-6748

� „ United Stites I:°.nvironmentai Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20400 A, IIL I-orni Approved
PPIF( I
Iv`I?IES Compliance Inspection Report CNIE* No,: 00 00{?:
North Carolina Department cif E rivironment and Natural Resources Approval Expires
Diyisican of Water uatity, Mooresville Regional C7ffice NCDENR _ ,1111K:;
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPD S Permit No. '4 O/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Tear
5 NCO046892 04/05/28 C C
?
Remarks:
Ins ector. Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating Bi QA
Reserved.,.....,....
0.7 5 N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
Dame and Location of facility Inspected: 8:30 am
September 1. 2001
Motiva Enterprises, LLC. Exit Time:
Charlotte South Terminal 9:45 am
Permit Expiration Date:
6851 Freedom Drive Date:
June 30, 2005
Charlotte, NC 28214 1 May 28, 2004
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------Titles) Phone No(s):
Wayne Caudal Terminal Operator 704-394-2314
Name and Address of Responsible Official: -
Title:
r, Ken Watson
Terminal Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Phone No.
Contacted?
4IC} Tom Sadler Road
(iO4) 399-3301
No
Charlotte. C 28214
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit Z Flow Measurement Z Operations & Maintenance
El Sewer Overflow
Records/Reports ® Self -Monitoring Program Z Sludge Handling/Disposal
El Pollution Prevention
Z Facility Site Review ® Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program
❑ Multimedia
Effluent/ReceivingEffluent/Receiving Waters Z Laboratoa ❑ Stourn Ater
0 Othen
Section D. Summary of FindingsiComments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise Indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s): Agency/OfficelTelepbone:
Date:
�#
MCWQPt(704) 3 6-5500"
June 14, 2004
Ja es P. Wilson,11
Signature of Revieer: Agency/Office
Date:
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

PPFFr'
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected June 26, 2003 by James Wilson of Mecklenburg County
Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was issued on
July 25, 2002.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and expires on June 30, 2005,
The permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater from Outfall 001 and treated groundwater and
truck loading rack stormwater from Outfall 002.
The treatment works for Outfall 001 consists of containment basins surrounding the
above ground storage tanks. to water is held in these basins until a visual inspection is
completed and documented, then it is manually released.
The treatment works for Outfall 002 consists of a groundwater remediaLion system. The
system includes a series of recovery wells, an oil/water separator, dual particulate filters, two
carbon vessels in series, a five tray air stripper, a catalytic oxidation system, flocculation tank-,
clarifier with overflow weir, and final holding tank.
The permit appears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period April 2003 through
available at the site. The Terminal Operator maintains organized records, logs and
documentation relevant to the NP)ES permit.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution.
All of the major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection. The facility discharges to an unnamed
tributary to Long Creek, which is a Class S-IV water in the Catawba River Basin.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 001 is accomplished using an in -line flow meter. Flow
from Outfall 002 is measured by calculation of discharge duration and site specific gain gin1c;
tables, as allowed by permit conditions.

LABORATORY:
Prism Laboratories, Inc performs chemical analysis of effluent samples (NC Laboratory
Certification # 402). E.T.T. Laboratories (NC Laboratory Certification ## 022) performs effluent
Acute Toxicity testing. Prism and E.T.T. Laboratories were not evaluated under this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek;, a waterbody classified as
DNS -IV waters within the Catawba River Basin.
e facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. No visual problems were
observed in the receiving stream.
SELF-MONITORINGPROGRAM:
DMRs were reviewed for the period April 2003 through March 2004. The reports
that all parameters are being monitored at the proper location and frequency.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained. All components of the
treatment system are inspected daily.

NNN A
C�- 19
Q
North CE
>
October 13, 2003
Nicola E. Cloutier
Environmental Engineer
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
2232 Ten Ten Road
Apex, North Carolina 2752
9
Subject: M`1
N­P
Mo
NP
Me
Me
Dear Ms. Cloutier.
rurg County
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
tght include installation of a filtration device at the point of discharge and/or efimin4 n of the source of NITBE.
rve any questions about these decisions or NITRE policy, please feel free to contaci Sergei Chernikov at (919) 733
n 594.
Sincerely,
�
David A, Goodrich
roSupervisor, NPDES Unit
resville Reg anal Office, Water Quality Section
ral Files
)ES Permit File, NCO04 892
)ES permit File, NCO022187
4, C. Divisio of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-16171 [phone]
Customer Service 1 800 623-7748

State of North Carolina
LVUWVWA
Department of Environment jk 0
and Natural Resources OA"—
ft
Room
Division of Water Quality bL azm� i� NOR
ft, M AM"M
Michael F. Easley, Governor Mm%�DEIN
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NoRTH 'ThICZA-11 ENVIRONMENt-ANd N&N4
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director "z,30URCES
ALCTRCE
September 9, 2003
Ms. Nicola Ellis srr Is 2003
Motiva Enterprises LLC
2232 Ten Ten Road
Apex, North Carolina 27539
Subject: Request to discharge
Permit NCO046892
Charlotte South Terminal
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Ellis:
The Division has reviewed your request to discharge accumulated rainwater from
needs to be continued, you will need to contact the Division to modify
it sheet of the permit.
I — ---- ' - -1 -- - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - - - --C71 ---- - - - - - I K - - - - - - - - - - - - - A
)hone number [phone], extension 520.
Sincerely,
Valery Stephens
NPDES Unit
,entral Files
NONOWnal Office, Water Quality Section
VPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer VISIT US ON THE INTERNE T @ http:i/h2o.enir.state,nc.us/NPDES

Michael F. Easley, GoL
William G. Ross Jr., Semi
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resow
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Dire
Division of Water Out
Nor
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Dire
Division of Water Qut
July 25, 2003
Ken Watson, Terminal Manager
[va Enterprises, LLC
To Sadler Road
lotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO046892
Mecklenburg County, NC
r Mr. Watson:
:lased report should be self-explanatory.
to can mr. tucnara Driageman or inc aL Lim utinx.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
are
sty Ito le, MCWQP
pw
va.0046892.0703 Aoc
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115

Names
Jahn Ta
Ken W
Name a
Mr. Ker.
Motiva
of Facility inspected.
.LC.
anal
kesponsible Official:
Permit Fl
Records/Reports ® Ss
® Facility Site Review [l C
Effluent/Receiving Waters Li
All areas are rated satisfactory unless
Signature a spector(s)r
J s P. Nilson, II
Signature of Reviewer.
2003/06/26 j
1:50 pin September 1,
Exit Time.
3:20 pm Permit Expir
Date: June 30, 2005
June 26, 2003
.u�wa.,tait.lic k:JtJVL,
nitoring Program [I Siud
nee Schedules D Pretre
—
Agencytvincet a eiepnone.
MC QP/(704) 33 -5500
Agency/Office
EPA korm .3�W-J (Devised 3-8.�) Previous Editions are Obsolete
Endhng!Disposal EJ
:nt Program
`er Overflow
ation Prevention
amedia
re
Date:

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected June 13, 2002 by James Wilson of Mecklenburg County
Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was issued on
June 28, 2002.
PERMIT:
The current pen -nit became effective on September 1, 2001 and expires on June 30, 2005.
The permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater from Outfall 001 and treated groundwater and
truck loading rack stormwater from Outfall 002.
The treatment works for Outfall 001 consists of contaimnent basins surrounding the
above ground storage tanks. to water is held in these basins until a visual inspection is
completed and documented, then it is manually released.
The treatment works for Outfall 002 consists of a groundwater remediation system. The
)w weir, and final holding tank.
permit appears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
3/REPORTS:
lable at the site. The Tenninal Operator maintains organized records, logs and
amentation relevant to the NPDES permit.
�ILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution.
All of the major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared
e operating properly at the time of the inspection. The facility discharges to an unnamed
itary to Long Creek, which is a Class WS-IV water in the Catawba River Basin.
)W MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 001 is accomplished using an in -line flow meter. Flow
ri Outfall 002 is measured by calculation of discharge duration and site specific gauging
es, as allowed by permit conditions.

RORATORY:
3
ix
d
4:
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained.
treatment system are inspected daily.
All components of the

William G. t ir- seciveary
North GMIM2 tsarcment cif environment and Naujnaj Resourcvs
Alan V1, Kfitne4, P = Litre -_tar
Division ofvi;aterCl ;ny
June 28, 2002
1r. Larry M. Couch, Terminal Manager
otiva Enterprises, LLC
10 'Tom Sadler Road
"harlotte, North Carolina 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Motiva Enterprises. LLC
Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO04 892
Mecklenburg County, NC
)ear Mr. Couch:
On June 13, 2002, Mr. James Wilson of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
L1f1164tAL 44+11 "I'l llis7 .!'.4V4A4JA1::"L, 1"4 111&�y a 11AA0 AA10F. kim— 'Y"o 4±WAA&AN .4ir44 L1kl: F6 L ,
agreement between. Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. The encl
report should be self-explanatory.
State to call Mr. Richard Bridgem .n or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
x
D. Rex Gleason
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
insure
[dusty Rozzelle, MC QP
4otiva.0046892.0602 doe
tZ E w
Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 2$116 Phone [phone]u
FAX (704) 663-SD40

.�. ® i"..: i.. 'li +• : lit
i"
MIMI
f i
!
!
t: • t. ` f. f..
* d
f 1 P f« t
ft Itmig.f
EPA dorm .3.)6U-3 (devised .3-&5) Previous Editions are Obsolete

PPPP_
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected June 26, 2001 by James Wilson of Mecklenburg County
Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP). A Notice of Deficiency was issued on July
19,2001.
PERMIT:
The facility operated under a previously issued permit until it expired on August 31,
2001. The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and expires on June 30, 2005.
111111 rjs M�UMMINUMIM11•1 1
---
ipper, a catalytic oxidation system, flocculation tank-, clarifier with overflow weir, and final
Iding tank.
The permit appears adequate for the waste stream being treated.
T,CORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period April 2001 through
arch 2002. The reports appeared to be properly completed. Copies of effluent analytical
;ults are readily available at the site. The Terminal Operator maintains organised records, logs
d documentation relevant to the NPDES permit.
� CILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution.
All of the major components of the facility treatment works were in service and appeared
be operating properly at the time of the inspection. The facility discharges to an unnamed
butary to Long Creel-, which is a Class WS-Al water in the Catawba River Basin.
,OW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 001 is accomplished using an in -line flow meter. Flow
im, Outfall 002 is measured by calculation of discharge duration and site specific gauging
)1es, as allowed by permit conditions.

-qq
within the Catawba River Basin.
Jity was not discharging at the time of the inspection. No visual problems were
stream.
'ORING PROGRAM:
vere reviewed for the period April 2001 through March 2002. The reports
- facility was meeting permit effluent limits during this period. Records indicate
ers are being monitored at the proper location and frequency.
3 & MAINTENANCE:
.lity and isite appeared well operated and maintained. All components of the
n are inspected daily.

\\4NV AT Michael F. Easley
Governor
ENWR William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
January 29, 2001
INZIL DIVIM or,
414VIRC � NT, HER AL
YCOUCH 0 NATORAL
i Enterprises
pox 88
1 FFR
—REEK, NC 28130
Subject Renewal Notice
NPDES, Permit N@PM8W9V1 P111 N1, i Al"A" 9 1 b 0,
Charlotte DF terminal MORRENOD' KNOX, ffiffi ME,
Mecklenburg County
)ermittee:
The subject permit expires on August 31,2001, North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 21+0105(e)) requires
i application for permit renewal be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. If you have already
I your renewal application, you may disregard this notice.
ling upon the delinquency , of the request'.
wastewater discharge will occur after August 31, 2001 (or if continuation of the permit is desired), the current
renewed. Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1
t in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day,
vastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact Bob Sledge of the
pliance Enforcement Unit at [phone], extension 547. You may also contact the Mooresville Regional
663-1699 to begin the rescission process.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must submit with
permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me. My telephone number, fax number and e-mail
tress are listed at the bottom of this page,
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr,
NPDES Unit
Central Files
NPDES File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES e-mail: [e-mail]

NPDES Permit NCO046892
Motiva Enterprises
Mecklenburg County
terns are REQUIRED for all renewal package
and two copies.
Tl
Q Industrial facilities
Federal Regulations
(copy attache
riginal and two
ch as a consult
ientation must l
Part II.B.1 Lb c
e management 1
treatment are l
s
•
by the permittee or
Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of
rust submit a Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in accrue
is not completed within one week of March 4, 2001
PPA. Submit the PPA as soon as possible after March 4
tcility since
Authorized
it) prepares
ated to any
;e (or other
de of
th 40
it the
i dZi.. 1[.F (.+Y L.. d4C1 f.F.d:84.8d.8 L;#l6 i[V4x7 l V%-. 2 Ci l}i.Jl 6V L.11"AAIKLI3Vrall l lXG/d,# lld4l LLt7:Slldd l G,[.i..£k::klGa'.
PLEASE NOTE.
Niue to a change in fees effective January 1, 1999, there is no renewal fee required with your
application. package.
Send the completed renewal package to
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NC DENR / Water Quality / N DES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27+99-1617