NC0005185_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

a
Bell, Wes
From Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]>
Sent. Monday, December 12, 201610.40 A
To: Bell, Wes
Subject RE; Hydrostatic Testing Magellan Charlotte 11
Mr. Bell,
The water from the testing would be held in a secondary containment and then discharged through t utfall 006 at the
regular flew rate that the normal discharge would occur after a rainfall event.
Thank you,
Ranae Smith
Eni ental Specialist lI
One Williams Center, OTC-8
Tulsa, Oklahoma 741
Office-918-574-7195
Cell: 91- -02
From: Bell, Wes [mailto.wes.bell ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 4.02 PM
To Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]
Subject: RE: Hydrostatic Testing Magellan Charlotte 11
Sent by an external sender. Use caution opening attachments, clicking web links, or
replying unless you have verified this email is legitimate.
Ranae,
You are welcome.
I do have a few additional questions. Where is the discharge geeing and what will be the measures taken to prevent
erasion, turbidity, etc.?
Thanks and have a good weekend too.
MM
From: Smith, Ranae mailto.Ranae,Smith ma ellanl .comb
Sent} Friday, December 09, 2016 4.84 PM
To Bell, Wes <Wes.bell ncdenr. ova
Cc St.Clar, Christy <Crist .stclair ma ellanl .etrm
Subject: RE: Hydrostatic Testing Magellan Charlotte 11
Wes,
1

mar
a�► -A "MAGELLAN m
MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.
Environmental 0 nt'
One Williams Center
P.o. Box 22186, t TC-$
Tuln,t 74121-218E
December 9, 2016
Wes Bell
Environmental Specialist
Water Quality division
610 East Center Ave,
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE. NCDENR Permit #NC000S1S8
Hytimstatic Testing
Mr. Bell,
MagellaWs'Charlotte 11 Terminal is planning an upcoming project that will add truck to tank butane (H-
gra e) and natural gasoline (W-grade)' blending capabilities to Charlotte 2 terminal. Within this project,
Magellan plans to add above ground approximately 1 of new " pipe from offloading area to tanks.
Magellan is seeking permission to discharge hydrostatic test water to the outfall.
The new piping is to be leak tested per ASMEB31.4 method. The water for the hydro - test would come
from an outside hydrant and be approximately 1000 gallons. As this is new pipe, the testing water would
not be in contact with any product.
Construction on this project began in late November, 2016 and the testing is proposed in late December
or January, 2017.
Sincerely,
Ranae Smith
Environmental Specialist 11
One Williams Center CFTC-8
Tulsa, OK 74172
98-574-7195-0

PPppppp-
Bell,Wes
From. Smith, Ranae <Ranae.Smith magellanlp.com>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 3.43 PM
To: Bell, Wes
Subject: Hydrostatic Testing Magellan Charlotte II
Attachments: Hydra new Wipe C2 Blending Project.pdf
Hello Mr. Bell,
"Thank you for getting back with us about this Issue. Let us know what you think about the project and proposal and w
will get the proper plan in place to be compliant.
Thank you,
Ranae StWth"
Environmental Specialist 1
e Williams tenter, OTC-8
Tulsa, Oklahoma a 7412
Office: 918-4-719
Cell: 918-3 8-0926

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
B NALD R. VAN ]DER V ART'
��
'%Crefary
WaterP,esources d t x MMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALtTY Director.
September 13, 2016
Mr. Marls Bowen, Terminal Manager
Magellan Terminals Holdings, G.P.
Post Office Box 71
Paw Creek, North Carolina 28130
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
Charlotte R Terminal
NPI ES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Bowen.
On August 29, 2016, Mr . Charlie Hansen of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(M WQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a A
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Resource, it
(D' )
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes
Bell/Mooresville Regional ( fl" ce1D at (704) 23 -2192 and/or Mr. Hansen at (704) 280-0 84, or via
email at wes.bellta ricdenr, ov and with .h sen ecklenbur count nc. ov
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc Rusty Ruzzelle, MCWQP
;MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
State of North Carolina f Eavironutental Quality j Water Resources I Water Quality Regional rations
Mooresville Regional Office 161O East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville„ North Carolina 28115

Wday lnsp
108/29 117 11
Type
� Wz
areas,

PeLM—It
Yes
No NA_ NE
(if the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the perrnittee submitted a new
0
0
0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
No
00
# Are thereany special conditions for the permit?
©
0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
M
0
00
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Q
Comment: The f cili` 's current oermit became ` ectiv on 1Qf112Q15 and Ire on 6132J2Q20, The
last ins fiction of this Lagility was conducted by the Mecklenburg Counly Water
Quath
Program on 1Q1Q412Q11.
The facility does not currently operate eaMigiment listed in the oermit as Lein associated
with roundwater remediation activities includina the oil f water se ar for carbon filters and
air stri er at Qutfall 007. The outfall currentl d ' s not discharge. The facility
has a 6.000
gallon tank that collects the runoff from where 4utfall #007 will be in the future. This offline
outfall ggil2gtign tank is QLJM2gd out when needed by Heritage Environmental.
Other
elements of the facility are goMigtenj with the descriDtion in the germit. Dischargil from the
facilh includes stormwater that accumulates within the tank gontimment dike and
surrounding areas.
Record Kee in
Le& No NA Ng
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
MOOO
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
p
110
Are all records maintained for 3 years (tab. reg. required 5 years)?
M
; ©
11
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
M
©
011
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
©
11
11
Dates; times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DQ?
©
0
■
0
(if the facility is = or > 5MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24 with a certified operator
0
O
n
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
©
®
o
Is the f?RC certified at -grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
,
■
p
p
p
Page#

Permit: NCO005185 owner. pac,14. charlotte 11 Terminal
Inspection Date.- 0812912016 inspection Type. Compliance Evaluation
QpSLatlgas jh Majntena=2 Yes No NA NE
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0080
Solids, OH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Ea!24Y peLsonn2l insgggl: the oil / water seoarator weeKly for levels and MainjensInge nftd§-,
The facility ORC states that the pjI / water geparator is inspected by Her Ltagg Environmental
at I§gst annually. but as needed.
The fktlitv grounds were observed to be well keot and in good condition at the time of
inspection.
blow Measurement - Effluent Yes No N6 L415
# Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 01111
Is flow meter calibrated annually? M 000
Is the flow meter operational? 0 000
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? El 0 a 11
Comment: The flow meter located at ouffall #006 is used to measure flow from the facility. The flow
meter was last calibrated on 1/1/2016 by SLC Meters, A corly of the invoice and results re,
kept on -site.
Effluent PIVS Leas No N A t LE
Is right of way to the ouffall property maintained? a 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? M 0 0 11
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 11 El 8 11
Comment: The Lagilily)8Las not discharging at the time of insciection. No visual signs of Dollution were
observed below the outfall. All valves ilogeared Lo bg functional.
Page#

PAT MCCRCIRY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
:Secretary
Waterl esources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Director
u
July 18, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL 7009 2250 0000 8087 1207
r^! 4 i
N RECEIPT' QUESTED . ��..
Ms. Melanie Little, VP, Operations
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
One Williams Center MD 2
Tulsa, OK, 74172
Subject. Notice of Violation NO-201-PC-078
Failure to Submit Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reports (eDMRs)
Charlotte II Terminal
DES Permit NCO005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear ems. Little:
b
n(
F
a
e
electronically.
wm tting reports electronically is a violation of the terns
nt of civil penalties. In order to recline the risk of recei
plete your registration and submit your July 2016 DM
S. Tay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
c . NPDES File
Len ` File
State of North Carolina ( Environanental Quality I Water Resources
I617.Iv4ail Set -vice Center j Raleigh, North Carolina27699-1 17
919-707-9000
i

V
PAT_ MCCRORY
Govelmn
DONA1,D R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Direefor
June 24, 2016
Melanie Little
Magellan Terminals Holdings L P
One Williams Ctr
Tulsa, OK 74172
Subject, NPDES Electronic Reporting Requirements
Charlotte 11 Terminal
NPDES Permit Number: NCO00518
Dear NPDES Permittee.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rue. The rule requires NPDES regulated facilities to
report information electronically, instead of filing written paper reports. The rule dues not change what
information is required from facilities. It only changes the method by which information is provided (i.e.,
electronic rather than paper -based):
EPA is phasing in the requirements of the rule over a -year period, The two phases of the rule, and their
key milestones, are:
• Phase 1—Starting can December 21, 201b, regulated entities that are rewired to submit Discharge
Monitoring Reports (D Rs) will begin submitting these reports electronically. If you are currently
reporting your DMR data electronically using eDMR; then you simply need to continue reporting
in the same way as you are now. The; key change is that, starting on December 21, 2016,
electronic reporting of DMRs will be required, instead of voluntary.
• Phase 2 —Starting can December 21, 2020, regulated entities that are required to submit certain
other NPDES reports will begin submitting these reports electronically. Reports covered in the
second phase include Notices of Intent to discharge in compliance with an NPDES general permit„
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports, and a number of other NPDES program reports.
Incorporating Electronic Reporting Requirements into NPDES Permits
The NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule requires authorized NPDES programs to incorporate electronic
reporting requirements into NPDES permits beginning December 21, 2015. Under the new rule, the
electronic reporting process supersedes the paper reporting process. According to our files, your NPDES
permit became effective after November 2013, and should contain the requirement to electronically
report your Discharge Monitoring Reports using NC DWR's eDMR system.
In addition to requiring permittees to report information electronically, the rule also requires permittees
to identify the initial recipient for the NPDES electronic reporting data (see 40 CER 122,41(1)( )]. lnitit l
State of North Carolina I Environmental duality I water Resources
1617 Mal Scri iQe Center I Raleigh,, North Carolina 77699-1617
9198076300
irces

recipient of electronic NPDES information from WDES-re gulatedfacilities (initial recipient) means the
entity (EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity
for receiving electronic NPDES Data [see 40 CFR 127.2(b)]. Permittees are required to electronically
submit the required NPDES information to the appropriate initial recipient, as determined by EPA, By July
18, 2016, EPA must identify and publish on its web site and in the Federal Register a listing of initial
recipients by state and by NPDES data group. Once available, you can use EPA's web site to find out or
determine the initial recipient of your electronic submission.
NC DWR has submitted a request to EPA to be the initial recipient for the following NPDES data groups:
1. Discharge Monitoring Reports;
2. General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (NOls); Notices of Termination (NOTs)];
1 Pretreatment Program Reports; and
4. Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports
submission for each state. Instructions on how to access and use the appropriate electronic reporting
tool will be available as well.
For more information on EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, visit
electron ic-r2pqqjng:Lq!t, For more information on electronic reporting to NC DWR, visit
htt de ,nc. ov about divisions water -resources edmr rides -electronic -re ng or contact Vanessa
Manuel at 919-807-6392 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Je4j 0. pry- v-P44+
for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Cc: NPDES File
Central Files

LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS
PROFESSIONAL GROUNDWATER D
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
PINE TREE DRIVE
SUM 250
ST. PAUL MN $5112
(651) 49 -1405 jECFk E 1
FAX (65I) 490-1006
5
June 3, 2015
?erMkt(t0C3
Derek Denard ReCE1VED/NCDENR/DWft
NCDENR Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Pennitting Section ' AUG G 2 5 2015
Compliance & ExpeditedPermitting Unit WORO
1617 :Mail Service Center MOORESViLLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Raleigh, NC 7699-161'
Re: NPDES Application Additional Information
MagellanCharlotte 11 Terminal
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
DES Pennit NCO005185
d:
On behalf of Magellan i s Partners, L.P. agell , Legge , BrashBrashears and Graham, Inc.
(LBG) is submitting a revised Engineering Alternatives Analysis for the MagellanCharlotte l
Terminal. This information was requested in the letter from the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources dated .April 8, 2015.
If you have any questions or concerns with the EAA, please do not hesitate to call me at C6 1 58-
9 6.
Sincerely,
LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC.
(J?� AA�--
Rachelle A. Busser
Environmental Engineer 11
Cc: Steve Carson - Magellan MidstreamPartners, L.P.
Enclosure
SATechWagellan Cbidoft liftginecrWDES permiMPDES pmmiit moth c \nevi . May 2015\Cover Lefter - NPDES
modification Additional Informationdoc
CONNECT[FLORIDA • ILLINOIS * MASSACHUSEM # MICHIGAN * MINNESOTA • MISSOURI
NEW JERSEY • NEW YO + NORTH DAKOTA + OHIO • PENNSYLVANIA + SOUTH DAKOTA • TEXAS : WISCONSIN'

MAGELLAN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE 11 TERMINAL
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
10 U'y Lll�
NR).
;ystern uses blowers to extract soil vapor and some liquids from below the
A212ficant:
Applicant Name- Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
Mailing Address: One Williams Center MD 27
Tulsa, OK 74172
Contact Person: Steve Carson [phone]

Facilit;��
Facility Name: Magellan Charlotte Il Terminal
Facility Address: 8026 Mt. Holly Road
Mecklenburg County
Charlotte, NC 28214
Contact Person: Mark Bowen (7 4) 3 -63 1
EAA Preparer:
Preparer Name. Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc.
Preparer Address; 8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250
St. Paul, NIN 55112
Contact Person. Rachelle Busser (51) 58-9 26
Remediat ©n Svstem Flaw Pro`ecti ns:
Extraction rates may increase or decrease throughout the year due to a fluctuating groundwater
table. Because of this variability, an estimated average design -flow rate would be approximately
5 gallons per minute (gpni), which includes instantaneous batch discharges of approximately 20
gpm, and an estimated annual discharge of 1 million gallons per year.
Technologically Feasible Alternatives Analysis:
The following alternatives have been evaluated:
• Connection to an existing wastewater treatment lant — A request to connect to the
Charlotte -Mecklenburg publicly owned treatment works (POTW) was submitted on
February; 11, 2014. The Charlotte -Mecklenburg PoTw is not currently accepting
connections and the request was denied; therefore this alternative is infeasible and as a
result, a Present Value Cost Analysis was not completed. Correspondence with the
Charlotte -Mecklenburg POTW stating that they are not accepting connections from
groundwater treatment systems is included as Attachment 1.
• Land application — The hydraulic loading rate and the total area of land needed for land
application were calculated. Based on the calculations approximately 950 square feet of
land is needed for irrigation. The properties surrounding the Terminal are all developed
as either industrial or residential properties. The amount of undeveloped land needed for
irrigation is net available; therefore, land application is infeasible and as a result, a
Present Value Cost Analysis was not completed. Lana application calculations are
provided in Attachment 2.
• Infiltration galleries infiltration galleries were discussed as a potential alternative with
the NCIENR and would be an acceptable alternative. A Present Value Cost Analysis is
included in the next section:
• In -situ groundwater remediation, wells — The current remediation system utilizes air
sparge (AS) technology as an in -situ groundwater remediation technology. 'Soil vapor
extraction (SVE) and catalytic oxidation systems are used in conjunction with the AS
2

ire and treat fugitive volatile organic
to Occasionally moisture sonde'
'E system — and it is for this water th
1. Other fonns of in -situ treatments
,nnal treatments are not recommem
ich as pipelines.
atives:
:ion of technologically feasible at
outfall, infiltration galleries and i
included in Attachments 3, 4 and 5, respe(
,sent worth costs developed for each alternative.
ins generated
I build-up or
odification is
cat oxidation
k ,,s to buried
$6,234,380
inent Review Form:
Itachment 6.
3

FIGURES
Figure I Site Location Map
Figure 2 Process Flow Diagram

r Existing �emedition 13uildin
to Air Treatment
VaL)or
V or
iquidsl SVE Blower
Liauids
0E
Wells Knockout Drum
Air to
Atmosphere
Product
Oil/Water
Separator
I Transfer Pump Drum with
Overpack Flow
Meter
Discharge to
POTW
Li L-
le
4-
Transfer Pump Air
Stripper
Air
Strip Blower
Stripper
)er Optional Carbon Vessels I
Proposed Groundwater Treatfmjn-tSkid_
Prep ared By: MAGELLAN TERMINAL HOLDINGS, L.P.
LEGGET-FE, BRASH AR & GRAHAM, INC. CHARLOTTE TERMINAL 11
Professional Groundwater and Environmental Engineceing Services CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
& Pine Tree Drive. Suite 205
St. Paul. Minnesota 55112 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
[phone] FILE: Charlotte PID 021014.dwq DATE: Septem er 2014 FIGU 11 RE 2

From: Gintert, Bill <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 21,2014 12:56 PM
To: Paul Donovan
Cc: Jared [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; Rachelle Busser; Kim
Blomker
Subject: RE: Treated groundwater discharge to sanitary sewer
Mr. Donovan,
Thank you for sending along the information related to this project for review. Unfortunately, at this time Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Utility Department is not permitting or accepting groundwater discharges to the sanitary sewer
system. The best outlet for this water is through an NPDES permit issued by the NCDENR as you are already
investigating.
Thanks again for contacting me regarding this matter.
Bill Gintert
Environmental Compliance Manager
System Protection
Environmental Management Division
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department
4222 Westmont Dr.
Charlotte, NC. 28217
p: 704-336-4636
f. 704-336-5077
c: 980-200-2339
From: Paul. [e-mail] [mailto: Paul. Donovan@lbgmncoml
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 2:31 PM
To: Gintert, Bill
Cc: [e-mail]; Michael. [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: FW: Treated groundwater discharge to sanitary sewer
Bill,
Please reconsider the Magellan Midstream Partner, LP (Magellan) request to connect to the sanitary sewer located at
Mount Holly Road and Hugh Caldwell Road in Charlotte, NC. Magellan is working closely with Mr. Ed Leach of the
NCDENR (cc'ed here) to clean-up historic petroleum -related impacts to soil and groundwater at the Former Amoco
Terminal No. 254 located at 7924 Mount Holly Road. Magellan's proposed water treatment and discharge concept has
been reviewed and approved by the NCDENR.

t this time due to the illegal dumping situation and staffing we are unable to accept and permit groundwater
remediation projects.
If you have any additional questions or need for discussion please contact Bill Gintert at 704-3; 6-4636.
Tim Downs
Environmental Compliance Supervisor
Environmental Management/ System Protection
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department
City of Charlotte
4222 Westmont Drive '
Charlotte, NC 28217
704.336.5042 FAX [phone]
From. [e-mail] [mailto.Rachelle.Busser Ib mn.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 9.9 AM
To, Downs, Tim
Subject: RE: Treated groundwater discharge to sanitary sewer
Hi Tura,
I just wanted to check in a see if you have an answer regarding our request to connect the remediation system to the
sanitary seiner.
Thank you
Rachelle Busser, P.E.
Environmental Engineer ll
L.eggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc.
8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250
t. Paul, IVIN 55112
651-558-9226
651-269-0170 (cell)
rachef le.busser Ib mn.corn
From. Downs, Tim [mailto: dawns ci, harlotte.nc us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 201 4:30 PM
T; Rachlle Buser
Subject.RE. Treated groundwater discharge to sanitary sewer
Rachelle
We are still discussing this in light of the illegal dumping incidents we had here in Charlotte on February
6'h and 9`h .
I still have the question of how you would connect to the sewer if it is permitted as a direct
discharge?(see my comment below) ' Also if you carat tap into the sewer at this location the only other
option is pump and haul which we've had to make more restrictive due to the illegal dumping.
I've copied the manager of our group to get his opinion so I hope to have an answer soon.
Tim

>s
Tim Downs
Environmental Compliance Supervisor
Environmental Management/System Protection
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
4222 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, NC 2 217
704.336.5042 fax [phone]
tdowns ci.charlotte.nc.us
From: Rachelle.8usser lb m .com mailto # ac elle.l3us er ..mn.coi i�
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 3:28` PM
To: Downs, Tim
Subject: RE: Treated groundwater discharge to sanitary sewer
Tim,
I am following up on the letter dated 'February 11, 2014, regarding the request to discharge treated
groundwater to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg POTW A copy of the letter is attached for your
convenience. Are you still considering this type of permit? Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions regarding the request:'
Thank you,
Ra helle 8usser, P.E.
Environmental Engineer 11
Leggette,'6rashears & Graham, Inc.
Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250
St. Paul, MN 55112
651-558-9226
651-269-0170 (cell)
[e-mail]
From. Downs, Tim [iailt :tdowns c i.c rl tt w....n.0 . r
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 9:39 AM
E. Treated groundwater discharge to sanitary; sewer
checked with our Customer Service Division and the sewer line Is there but
4

k "6
maybe more. A map showing the ex
line would be very helpful also.
Have you investigated the passibility
If you have any additional questions
Tim Downs
Environmental Compliance Supervis
Environmental ManagementSysten
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
4222 Westmont Drive'
Charlotte, NC 28217
704,336.5042 fax [phone]
[e-mail]
From: [e-mail]
VMiJ)GV4:! f d1rWC.SrW i�l\.f:W(fW VVWL4l WiJL},Wf 1�4 4V
Thanks,
Rachelle Busser, P.E.
Environmental Engineer 11
Legett, Brashears & Graham, Inc.
R`Pine Tree Chive, Suite 24
St. Paul, MN 55112
551-5-5226
551-490-100 (fax)
[e-mail]
s
:ion of the remediation site to the roads and sewer
IDES permit through NCl3ENR?
contact me
tion
Rachelle.Busser lb mn»cam]
in the letter including site location, remediation
groundwater analytical results. What compounds
pie of the treated groundwater? -What ether
e letter"?

MAGELLAN TERMINALS HOLDINGS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE 11 TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNT OF AREA NEEDED FOR LAND APPLICATION
Questiow. Provide an estimate of the best case hydrualic loading rate based on County Soil Survey. Include calculations
showing the hydraulic loading rate and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system, including buffers,
Step 1: Calculate percolation rate
i"112
PERC k,, Cd (24 hr/day) W
M
Where: PERC = percolation rate (in/day)
k,at = soil permeability (in/hr)' = 1.913
Cd = drainage coefficient' E4
Step 2: Calculate water loading rate
WLRD = (EVAP + PERC-) - Precip
Where: WLRI) = Design water loading rate (irthrionth)
EVAP = Potential Evapotraspiration Rate (in/month)2
PERC = Calculated percolation rate (in/month)
Precip = 80tb percentile annual precipitation 3 (in/month) zL 06
Step 3: Calculate land area needed to process IMGY of water
Area = Flowrate / WLRD
Where: Flowrate = maximum daily flowrate (gallons/day) 2739.73
W1Ru = Design water loading rate (in/day) 4.62
Notes:
I = From the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Custom Soil Resource Report for Meeklenberg County, No Carolina
2 = Evapotraspiration data from the State Climate Office of North Carolina
3 = Annual Climatological Summary obtained from the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
National Climatic Data Center
Land application cafes
5/26/2015 Page 1 of 2 IXG GFrtE, BPASHEARS & G&WAK INC.

MAGELLAN TERMINALS HOLDINGS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE It TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Precipitation Data (1984.2014)
Total annual
Precipitation*
Year
(inches)
2014
42.89
2013
49.61
2012
33.68
2011
44.5
2010
36,4
2009
48.14
2008
42.22
2007
28.61
2006
44.42
2005
41.88
2004
44.16
2003
62.63
2002
40,38
2001
26.23
2000
34.74
1999
34,91
1998
41.04
1997
48.74
196
40.15
1995
48.18
194
36.34
1993
35.81
1992
53.73
1991
45,18
1990
49.59
1989
49.79
1988
34,27
1987
39,32
1986
26,91
1985
49,32
1984
44.99
4834
80th Percentile
Note;
* Annual Climatnlnaaral Summaru nhtainarj frnm the

ATTACHMENT 3
NPDES Discharge Cost Estimate

PVCA Calculation Method I
pV = CO + C[((I+r)n_,)/(r(,+I_r)]
Where: PV = Present value of costs
CO = Costs incurred in present year
C = Costs incurred in time t
n Ending year of the life of the faciltiy
r = Current EPA discount rate'
I IN 1 11 1 1 1 1 2

MAGELLAN TERMINALS HOLDINGS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE II TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH
CAROLINA
"
NPDES DISCHARGE SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
INSTALLATION OF NPDES DISCHARGE PIPING
Unit
Mark -Up
Rate
unit
'rY
°fn
Extensions Notes
UTILITY LOCATOR
Private Utility Locator
$5,000
LS
1
" T5%
St5,s75 general Esrmau,
SHED CCO
Estimate from SAEf}ACCO: Includes mob/demob, PM,
Install discharge pipe to NPIOES outfall
$35,750
is
1
7.5%
$38,431 piping installation, soil cuttings disposal, per diem
SUBTOTAL,
i $43,806
I„lnit
Mark -Up
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
Rate
Unit
QTY
°fo
Extension Notes
MMMITITAMMS
System Design
`n20,000
LS
1
0.0°pia
$20,000
Pennitting
$8,000
LS
1
0.0%
$8„000 NP]7FS discharge permit
Syystem installation:
Contracting, P,O,g, Coordination, Job :Plans, etc.
$120
Firs
24
0.01%
$2,880
Field Work
$120
firs
40
0.0%
$000
Flight
$750
Each
1
0.0%
$750
Parking Fees
$20
Day
4
0.0%
S80
Rental Car
$100
Day
5
0.0%
$500
Rental Gar Gas
$50
I S
1
0.0%
$50
Hotel
$95
Blight
it
0.0%
$380
Per Diem
$75
Day*
5
0.0%
$375
PIDfLEL
S300
Week
I
0.0%
$300
System Start-up
Coordination, Job Plans, tNotificirtions„ etc.
$120
firs
30
0.0%
$3,600
LBO Field Work
$120
airs
60
0.0%
$7,200
Flight
$750
Tacit
1
0,0%
$750
Parking Fees
$20
Day
5
0.0%
Mo
Rental Car
$]00
Dav
5
0.0%
$500
Rental Car Gas
$50
I'S
1
(10%
$50
Hotel
$95
Night
5
0.0%
$475
Per Diem
$75
tidy
5
0.0%
S375
PIDILEL
$300
Week
1
0.0%
$300
Interface Probe
$195
Week
1
0.0%
$195
SUBTOTAL:
S$1,661)
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICE{
Sail Samples for Landfill
$500
Each
1
7.5%
$538 TCLP beti s TCLP metals, aTPs, Flashpoini
Start-up Water Samples '
$150
Fach
2
7.5%
$323 VOCs, CRC+, DRO, oil & ,Pas
SUBTOTAL:
$860
Page 3 of 4 Pages
L>tGGLLTE, BRASHEARS &Gx:tttr rjNC..

,w
ATTACHMENT
Infiltration Gallery Cast Estimate

Where: PV = Pre
CO = co
Co
Ent
r = Cuj
glue of costs
trred'in present year
erred in time t
ar of the life of the faciltiy
PA discount rate'
,ion: April 2014

MAGELLAN
TERMINALS HOLDINGS,
L.P.
CHARLOTTE 11 TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH
C"AROLIN.R
INFILTRATION GALLERY
DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
INSTALLATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERY
Unit
Mark -Up
Rate
Unit
QTY
%
Extension Notes
UTILITY LOCATOR
Private Utility Locator
$5,000
is
1
7.5%
$5,375 emnual Estimate
SAEDACCO
Mobilization/demobilization
$2,000
1.5
1
7.5%
$2,150
Health & Safety Plan, permits, PM, etc.
$500
LS
1
7.5%
$538
Excavate and install w 1,000 feet ofpipe
_' $.35
LF
1000
T5%
$37,625 Esusnam mot SAEDACCO
Excavate & install 100' 1)01 Inlithration Gallery to 15 feet bg
$40,075
LS
I
" 7.5°r
$43,081 Estimate i'rom SALDACM includes pca gravel haakfill Infiltrator,
Grade and Seed
$8
5F
3100
7 5%
SM,390 Estimate Can, SAEDACCO
Truck excess impacted soil to landfill
$40
C Y
245
T 5%
$10,535 E^ timmc from SAEDACCO: assumes 145 CY
PerDiLm, entire crew
$.350
day
10
7.5%
$3,763 Estimate m+m yAFDACT(X assumes 5 days
Monitoring well installation (asstmie six 2" wells)
$18,460
LS
1
7.5%
$19,845 Estimate man SAEDACCO
LANDFILL
Sail Dispnsal (non -hazardous)
$65
C'Y
245
7.5%
$17,119 Estimate fronx SAEDACCO
SUBTOTAL
$168,410
Unit
Mark -Ills
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Rate
Unit
PITY'
%
Extension Notes
& UKAHAM, INC
SysternDesign
$30000
I.S
1
0.0%
$30,000
Permitting
$11,000
LS
I
0.0%
$1 1,000 Non -Discharge Wastovater System Parma - includes applicafion #lie
System Installation
Contracting, P.Q.s, Coordination, Job Plans, etc,
$120
I-irs
24
0.0°, i
$2,880
Field Work
$120
Errs
80
0.0%
$9,600
Flight
$750
Each
2
0.0%
$L500
Parking Fees
$20
Day
8
0.00,`0
$1 0
Rental Car
Sion
Day
10
0.0%
$1,000
Rental Car Gas
$50
LS
1
0,0°fo
$50
Hotel
$95
Night
8
0.0%
$760
Per Dram
$75
Day
10
0,0%
$750
PII7ILEL
$300
Week
2
0.0%
$600
System Start-up
Coordination, Job Plans, Notifications, etc.
$120
Hrs
60
0.0%
$7,200
LBG Field Work
$120
]firs
60
(to%
$7,200
Flight
$750
Each
I
0.0°/0
$750
Parking Fees
$20
Day
5
0.0%
$100
Rental Cat
$IC90
Day
5
0.0%
$500
Rental Car Gas
$50
LS
1
0.0%
S50
Hotel
$95
Night
5
0.0%
$475
Per Diem
$75
Day
5
0.0%
S375
PIL)ILEL
$300
Week
1
0.0%
.SMO
Interface Probe
$195
Week
1
0.0%
$195
SUBTOTAL:
$75,445
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICE,'
Steil Samples the Landfill
$500
Each
2
7.5%
$1,075 TCLP fienscs, TCt:I= metals, STET , Ftasliponn
Start-up Water- Samples
5150
Each
6
7,5%
$9 8 VOC's, GRO, DRO, TKN, Phosphorus, O&G, Ammonia
SUBTOTAL:
$2,043
z
Page
3 of 4 Pages
LEC.GETTE, $RAMEAR.c & GRA IAM, INC„

r
ATTACHMENT
Injection Well Cost Estimate

PVCA Calculation Method'
PV = Co + C[((I+r)n_1)1(r(l+rr)]
Where: PV = Present value of casts
Co = Casts incurred in present year
C = Costs incurred in time t
n = Finding year of the life of the faciltiy
r = Current EPA discount rate'`
DISCOUNT
2 ANNUAL PRESENT
NUMBE RATE CAPITAL RECURRING SUBTOTAL VALUE OF
OF YEA COSTS COSTS COST
20 4.875% 419,95 7,(11 $494,974
Notes:
1 — As described in the NCDENR's Engineering Alternatives Guidance Document, Revision: April 2014
2 = Discount rate provided by NCDEN1t
Charlotte injection wells cost estimate'
5/27/2015 Page 1 of 3 LEGGIET'T , BRASHEAR C.RAHAN , Nt'.

MAGELLAN
TERMINALS HOLDINGS, LX.
C 4ARLOTTE
It TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE,
NORTH
CY ROLINA
INJECTION WELL
SYSTEM
DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
INSTALLATION OF INJECTION WELLS
Unit
Mark -Up s
Rate
knit
QTY
%
Extension Notes
UTILITY LOCA FOR
Private vote 2ltiliiy Locator
$5,000
LS
1
7,5%,
$5,375 Gc—at Csamoe
SAEDACCO
Estimate frCllll SAEDACCO: 1nG11ides mob/demob, 1?1u1, well
Install six 4" injection wells
S16,885
LS
1
7.50%0
$18,151 installation, soil cuttings disposal" per diem
Estimate from SAEDACCO. Includes mob/demob, PM, well
Install four 2" monitoring wells
$13,240
LS
1
7.5%
$14,233 installation, soil cuttings disposal, per dtcm
Estimate from SAEDACCO: Includes mob/demob, P1Vl,
trenching, pipe materiats, backfilling, excess soil dispersal, per
Install lateral piping to injection wells
$293,750
LS
1
T5%
$305,031 them
SUBTOTAL::
$342,791
Unit
Mark -Lip
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Rate
Unit
QTY
%
Extension Notes
System Design
LS
l
0,0%
Permitting
p$30,001
CI t 000
LS
1
0,0%D
tl$30,000
l 1.000 Kon-Dicharge aVarun\atzr S Ctcm Permit- inclu ca application fee
Systeminstallation
Contracting„ P.O,s, Coordination, .lob Flans, etc.
$120
firs
24
O.i %
$2,880
Field Work
$120
Hrs
80
0.0%
'S9„600
Flight
S750
Each
2
0.0%
SI,500
Parking Fees
$20
Day
8
0,0°fie,
$160
Rental Car
$100
Day
10
0,0%
S1,000
Rental Car Gas
$50
LS
1
0.0%
$50
Hotel
$95
Night
8
0,0%
$760
Per Diem
$75
Day
10
0,00/0
$750
Pill/LEI.
S300
Week
2
0.0"✓c
4600
System Start-up
Coordination —lob Plans, Notifications„ etc.
$120
Firs
60
0,0%
$7,200
LBO Field Work
$120
Hrs
60
0,0%
$7,200
Flight
$750
Each
1
0.0%
$750
Parking Fees
$20
Dap"
5
0.0%
$100
Rental Car
$100
Day
5
0.0%
$500
Rental Car Crag
$50
LS
1
0.0%
$50
Hotel
S95
might
5
0.0%
$475
Per Diem
$75
Day
5
0,0%
$375
PID/LEL
$300
Week
1
0.0%
$300
Interface Probe
$195
Week
1
0,0%
$195
SUBTOTAL:
$75,445
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Sail Samples for landfill
S500
Each
2
T 5%
$1,075 TCLP l,enrrs, TCLP metals, OTEX, Finshpoitit
Stan -up Water Samples
$150
Each
4
7,5%
$645 VOC4, GX0, DRL1
SUBTOTAL:
$1,720
Page 3 of 4 Pages
LEGGFTTE, BRASUEARS & GRA rAM, INC.

ATTACHMENT 6
Local Government Review Documents

`k
ONo
'
�+R
La"
p h '.s t✓w �a'
701 0�70 ' : C Ci i 4285
g
7 .,.�........«.., tma=, .�.M r.r a...-.r�,.b ,....,. ?.. ... ...;.-.t.,�.........,..,...«.w...M».-.».... ,«... ... a_ �...W«.....�--. ... ..-:.... ..,.e.:,...»,.......�.,....:... ,......�..w..;,».... „y
6
4
s
t

North Carolina Department of nrnln and Natural Resources
Pal McCrory Donald R, van der tiaart
Governor Secretary
.tune 3, 2015
Ms, Melanie Little, VP, Operations
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
e Williams Center MD 27
Tulsa, OK 74172
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit NCO005185
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
Charlotte 11 Terminal
7924 Old Mt. Holly Road, Charlotte 28214
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Little:
In response to your request to renew the subject NPDES permit, the Division of Water Resources (DWR or the
Division) hereby transmits this draft for your review and comment. Please review this document to assure your
understanding of the permit limits and monitoring conditions, and to correct errors, if any.
The Division understands that you intend to mare significant changes to your facility in the bear future to include
your intent to discharge from a groundwater remediation system. We have therefore adjusted the parameter list
d monitoring in anticipation of this discharge. These include the following updates to your previous permit:
• added updates to facility neap, outfall locations and parameter codes
• added a groundwater remediation system (intermittent) which consists of a an air sprge /soil extraction
(A / VE) system, an oil/water separator, an air stripper and up to two (2) carbon vessels to the facility
description as Outfall 007
• added effluent limitation and monitoring requirements were added. for Outfall 007 [See Section A. ( )
• added Monthly Average Limit of 30.0 mgtL for Total Suspended Solids (T ) [Outfall 006 & 007
• for Oil & Grease, Tease note that [0055 i] remains the same for submitting DMR/e1 MR, but use test EPA
method 1664 (SGT-HEM) with results it rng/L [Outfalls 006 & 007
• replaced Phenol (single compound) [34694] with Total Recoverable Phenolics [32730.
Please note that additional information was requested on April 8, 2015 for more details on the engineering
alternative analysis (EAA) for the modification to add a groundwater remediation system. The Division requests this
information before this dram permit can be finalized.
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that,
if a state does not establish "-a system to receive such submittals, then pen rittees must submit DMRs electronically to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is
beginning implementation.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Cardina 27 -1 17
Phone: [phone] t Internet: www,nmaterquality,org
An Liam Opportunity 4 Afflmative Action Ernpioy& — Made in part by rarynded paper

R9CeIVeD/NCDF_t4R1DWR
Ms. Little JUG 9 2015
June 3, 2015
Page 2 of 2 WOROS
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICS
The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic
Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to your NPDES permit. [See Special
Condition A. (5.)] For information on eDMR, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please
visit the following web page:
htto://Dortal.nedenr.ora/web/),v /admin/boa/inu/edmr.
For information on EPA's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the following web site:
htto://www2.ei)a,aov/comDliiqannc)r�)ose�d-nt)des-electrortic-re:Dortinp--rule.
Concurrent with this notification, the Division will solicit public comment on this draft by publishing a notice in
newspapers having circulation in the general Mecklenburg County area, as required by the NPDES Program. Please
provide your comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DENR
DWR / NPDES Program no later than July 10, 2015. Your written comments are welcome but not mandatory.
Following the mandatory 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments on your
permit draft, and take appropriate action prior to issuing your NPDES permit final. If you have questions concerning
this draft, please e-mail me or call my direct line [phone].
Sincerely,
Derek Denard, Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Enclosure: NPDES Permit NCO005185 (renewal DRAFT)
hc: NPDES Program Files [draft permit and Fact Sheet]
Ann. Rachelle Busser, Leggette, Brasbears & Graham, Inc,, 8 Pine Tree Dr., Suite 250, St. Paul, MN 55112
ec: MRO / Michael Parker [michaelparker@ncdenr,gov] [draft permit, Fact Sheet]
Richard Farmer [[e-mail]] [draft permit, Fact Sheet]
MRO / Keri Cantrell [[e-mail]] [draft permit, Fact Sheet]
MRO-DWM-UST/ Edward Leach [[e-mail]]
Wastewater Operator Certification Group / Steve Reid [[e-mail]] [draft permit, Fact Sheet]
Aquatic Toxicology Unit/ Susan Meadows [[e-mail]] [draft permit, Fact Sheet]
Joshua McDorman, Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. Poshua.McDorman@magellanlpcoml

Permit NCO00518
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
RECSIvattE€
IDWR
JU
WOROS
:,. O R SVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISC E VATIC N SYSTEM
{ I7ES�
FIR
11
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina ral Statute ` , ° 15 1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by., rth Carolina En , mental Management
Commission, and the Federal W M. ollution Control Act, ended,
ft
Magellan Terrain 01 L *,
fi
d S 4 y ater��
is hereby authorized tc wastewater outfalls located at the
t�^.t � b = 1 k
0.
ha � to ` rm
'792 ' H ,,,,Rol q rl 2 214
a. 4
qd
ekle 0 U
,, . ..
to receiving waters design, a d tributa Long Creep it the Catawba River basin in
accordance t iimit� .qdt nts, and other conditions set forth in Darts 1,
IL, III a roz�
e ,
Yl00I all
This permit become effec � � °��,. s
2015.
This permit and au' ation to d `arge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2020.
�',icrne.d this dnv
S. Jay Zimmerman, Director
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC 0051 5
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and previsions described herein.
1x
rY
Magellan a final °k,,j , s,. P.
?3 S b
s
is hereby authorized to.
Y 1:
3
1. continue to operate a Water Pollution Control ��tem consisting of
? t�
n ?? } i
S y }
x r
• oil/water separators (servicing stormwater , } }j tom ` �Oadzng-racy.
".
• ` diked areas [secondary- ontai? } t for above-gr' Y ge tanks (ASTs) �� hydrocarbon
fuel capacity greater than one m on]
• manually -operated discharge s Wi lly closedl', int source to discharge stormwater
d city water used for washing an ��hyc testing, `�tz?
• ethanol off-loadi- automated valve (point -source
,
discharge - activ ent of pr t lose Nr
• groundwater diction em (Out ' n azr e/soil extraction (AS/ aVE)
system, an oil/ air striPp ,} d up to two ( ) carbon vessels.
located rlotte l a `. �d I It l Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, and
fillRa `4sY5 ;"t'1aX� } .4€i5 s*. s 4
;,� yYti3ti a Y,vy
k
{i
Y
,
F i
K "
n
2. discharge from: said treatment works via Outfalls 006 and 007, at a location specified can the
attached map, into an unnamed tributary to Long Creek.. [11-120-(2, ) , a waterbody classified as
S-IV, subbasin 03- i -34 [HUC: 03050101], within the Catawba River Basin.
Page 2 of 8

Permit NCO0051 5
A. I.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[I 5A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq.; 02B .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the effective date of the pertnit and lasting until expiration;, the Pertnittee is authorized to
discharge treated stormwater from Outfall 006. Such discharges shall be limited, monitored and
reported' by the Permittee as specified below:
Sk kY
t 1
Y
z bl 7 i
[50050] Flow .., , Episodid�` ':, , 2 Effluent
'
[0007 ] Turbidity 3 50 "„ ' Monthl y Grab Effluent
[005301 Total Sus ended Solids 30.0 m /L 45 q Monthly dab Effluent
[005] Oil and Grease Monthly Effluent
EPA Method 1664 SGT-FILM]
[32730] Total Recoverable � ������ ,r
f k
VI
grab ' Effluent
Phenolics
[3403] Benzene 4Fly Grab Effluent
,.,...,
[ 40101 Toluene 4 '_ s,', Ma" Grab Effluent
[34371] EthylBenzene 4 Montt z; . Grab Effluent
[1551 ] X lane 4thly
Grab Effluent
s i
[346961 Naphthalene 4 ti� �" ,. ", � �� t r Grab Effluent
., . ,.,....,,.,r .
[2241] 4
MTB Monthly Grab Effluent
[TAE6C Acute Tocikz�,r '�, y.Annually Carat Effluent
r a
1. t o f art 210 days frank t act v � t k of this perm'"he permittee shall begin submitting discharge monitoring
reports', onically using thdsoon s application system [see A. (5)].
Fit — eriods o no flow'' i'er I I submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
indicating''��charge.": For eaarge t, flow shall be monitored in one of four ways.
a) mefinuously;
b) calculate flog on total rat y per area draining to the outfa11; exclude built -upon area [See
Section A. (4)],Y���14
c) estimate flow at 0 4 e m during the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based on Y d "N p'logs.
1 Turbidity — Effluent shall no 4 <# receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving stream
background turbidity exceeds STU, effluent shall not cause this background value to increase.
4. This sample to be collected concurrently with annual acute Toxicity.
5. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3)]. Samples for Acute 'Toxicity
shall be collected concurrent with BTEX sampling.
Conditions:
• There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
• "There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
• following hydrostatic tank or pipe testing, the Permittee shall discharge no wastes containing benzene
concentrations greater than 1.1 fL, nor toluene concentrations greater than 11 µg/l.
Page 3 of 8

Permit NC0051 g5
A. 2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
15A NCAC 0 B .0400 et see[.; 02 .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permutes is authorized to
discharge treated groundwater from Outfall 007. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored' by the
Permittee as specified below:
In
"'Al {�
t
[50050 Flow �pisodit 2 Effluent..
[00076] Turbidi 50 N.., Monthly Effluent
` .. drab Euent
[005301 Total Sus ended Solids 30.0 mg/t. 45 q v Y'"` Monthly ab Effluent
[055] tail and Grease
Mo lly , Effluent
EPA. Method 1664 GT-HEM
[327301 Total Recoverable t -'}
' ly Grab Effluent
Phenolics 4
[3400] Benzene 4 ,.�,� ... ,ve „.hly Grab Effluent
[3401(}] Toluenegm,��- ,. Mtn Grab Effluent
[343 i l ] Ethyl Benzene N1k,.= Months ,, r Grab Effluent
[8I551 ] Xylene 4 1 ` hly grab Effluent
[34696] Naphthalene
4 Grab Effluent
[224171 MTBE Monthly Grab fffuent
�,. ,..�
TAE C Acute Toxicitys ` ,, . -�,. ��� Annually Grab Effluent
Footnotes .3 gi
y,. ����
Yi§�\ g
I. No fan 270 days frt{�s ffeetty of this permit; [he per ittee shall begin submitting discharge monitoring
report �omcally using they z s on s application system [see A. (5)].
2, l isa - eriods of no o Farina 11 sit a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report ()MR)
y
indi sting" - charge." Far a ��a fit, flaw shall be monitored in one of four ways:
a} treasure nUnuousty; �zx
b) calculate floe sin total rat ` per area draining to the outfll; exclude built. -upon area [See
Section A. (4.)]
c) estimate flow at 2ti r., ' $ , during the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based ont�e tn` snap togs.
. Turbidity -- Effluent shall no y� `" receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving stream
background turbidity exceeds 56NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to increase.
4. This sample to be collected concurrently with annual Acute Toxicity.
5, Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3)]. Samples for Acute 'Toxicity
shall be collected concurrent with BTEX sampling.
Conditions:
• There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
• There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
• Following hydrostatic tack or pipe testing, the Permittee shall discharge no wastes containing benzene
concentrations greater than 1.19 µg/L, nor toluene concentrations greater than 1.1 µg/L
Page 4 of 8

Permit NCO005185
A. (3.) ACUTETOXICITY ONITQ NG(ANNUAL)
A NCAC 02B .0500 et seq.]
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on an annual basis using protocols defined as definitive
in EPA. Document EPA-8 1--02-012 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents
and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a
Fathead Minnow (Pimcphales prom las°) 24 hour static test. Efflue f samples for self -monitoring
purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discar `} shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all waste treat arocessesy
t�t
The parameter code for Piniephyles pr-omelas is TAE+6C �tix � ting results required as part of
this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent O, ' rge Form 1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter co �� Y (original)
�dtioall , OVV� AT-1is to be
75
seat to the following address. tYlig
tS
Attention. North Carolin soon
p� Ater 1�esr�u�
Wte
y� tic Toxic,t
ch
t7ercenc+
1 1 iService0tS R t arolin 7699 1623
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms sh�te filet ` he War's fences Section no later than 30
days after the end of the rq eriod for the r � rlade v , Also,
v%iv rt tits�t�t3 ��
tt e t N tYt C \ Sva
t;tht t ,j�a t
Test data shall be con�j and acc and incl ul", portin �� ical/phy ical measurements
is�s
performed in associatorr the tox y tests, as ;�as all dose/response data. Total residual chorine
b.sa'z s k4 lx. �"f 'a"
of the effluent toxicity!aris Lust used and' orted if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
v, n?t'
the wastes o, 'd
a 6 t 3 Jy t2 El
E1111111 "I
Should hest data from' r the rnttoring c ements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Y
I ivision � hater Resourc � Icate teal impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened an�'t� fled to i clucf ate ` ring requirements or limits.
t ttb 1 � t
R
NOTE. Failure t f ieve test co ons as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival a t ropriatetj"Y ironmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate foll tes be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial moni,�'
ti
�b¢
s,
4,
z r,,
Page 5 of

Permit NCO005185
A. 4.) FLOW MEASUREMENT RATIONAL [G.S. 1 -21 .
The Rational Equation: Q=KuCIA, where.
flow (peak flow rate (cfs or misec)
Ian - units conversation factor = 1.008 for U.S. standard units (usually
ignored because it is so close to 1), or 0.278 for Sl units
dimensionless runoff coefficient for the wets , loosely defined
as the ratio of runoff to rainfall
1= intensity of rainfall talon from the interration-frequency
curves for the specified design retu f",Qie time Qf
concentration, to (inih or mm e ofntration (time
after the beginning of rainfall when all po� of the
drainage basin are contrzbu ultaneously to floes tythe
outlet).
A = area of tributary watershed (a'f }9 far km)
A
The rational equation is used tc gate the runoff -region, given.
,1 ;1
the runoff coefficient �h �� is for zn f �n and other
7
potential losses in the re01
d
• the raz 11sity to the
• the ftIV" runoftts upper teaches
1l, �.,
let, and
a
to �� �tegzon s darea. ,
,r x
� r
-12
lai s
S. C
n
l i(

Pe it NCO0051 5
A. . ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING
REPORTS [G.S. 14 -21 .1(lb)]
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring resorts (DMRs)
and specify that, if state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must
summit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates
that these regulations will be adapted and is beginning implemenq to late 201
4g g��
NOTE, This special condition supplements or supersedes the mg sections within Part ll of this
permit (Standard Conditions, or NPDES Permits):
,t3
• Section B. (11.) Signatory Requirements
« Section D. 2.) Reporting
..
� Y
Section D. (h.)Records Retention ;'
• Section E. (5.) Monitoring Reportsy r
1. Reporting Su ersedes Section � t�r ' d Section
Beginning no later than 270 days frot ti ve date o f ermit, the pe ittee shall begin
x C is b R 9
reporting discharge monitoring data el nied the 1 �� I s Electronic Discharge
w
IN A �>
Monitoring Report (eD� Internet app��jon �
E�Yfl t��Si
Monitoring result , teed cl the prev7 xpr s) s t "� ummar zed for each month and
submitted electro using e The e stem allows"permitted facilities to enter
ffit monitoring data and sectromcall� ng the Internet, Until such time that the statee s
eDMR a q ion is 0 3 r �'s Crossi' dia Electronic Reporting Regulation
(CRt tees quir`����lm1fk discharge monitoring data to e state
elf allyasnbe relut �gotnplete the eDMR submission by painting,
r kt
Sirand submitan}�gn i �mal and a"pY of the computer printed eDMR to the
foll01
o ddress. � �9 ��
'
tw ' 01
i.t 1
N DE1R R 1lnforrnat ` f'roeesirl Unit
AT 'EN N tral Files i R
1617 Mail Sep v�c� mot.. F ter
Raleigh, North Car 2? �t
ti
If a permittee is unable toe the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband
access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted
and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forrns (MR 1, 1. 1, 2, ) or
alternative foams approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the
mailing address above.
Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be
submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (0) days prior to the date the
facility would "be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be valid
Page 7 of 8

Permit NCO0 5185
for twelve (12) months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be `submitted
electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary
waiver by the Division.
Info anon on eDMR and application for temporary waiver from the NPDI S electronic reporting
requirements is found on the following web page;
htt :/1 ortal.ncdenr.or web/ /adminibo /i u/edmr
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is d�last clay of the month following
the issuance o the pe li it or in the case of a new facrY`i� $ t day of the month following the
commencement of discharge. 4
. Sienatory Rea uirements ISa ements Sec .4,� t' r:' 11. b and su ftt`. Section B. 11. d
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing aut �1 shall be si ned'by pl described in Part 11,
RE
Section B. (11)(a) or by a duly authorized rep rese a oft arson as des d in Part 11,
Section B. (11)(b). A person, and t a position; mrtt�� a tad signatory aunty for eDMR
17
reporting purposes.
H tt}} rI
Y
For eDMR submissions, the person sra��� rttrng th 0 F must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access , information an North
Carolina's el iMR sy terrng for Rand and R user account, please visit
3
the following Deb71
htt :II ortal.ndenr.cr,rN
reb/ f`ll, `t �inlbo r u� r
3s,
y
Crtrfrr { arson' �tonrc R using the state's eDMR system shall snake
the g c on [4 122 2a-VAnug'tp�R STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION
V1 zACCF PTA ,„
.. 1 SM
"I certi' der penalty � that t��Wc rra rrt and all attachments were prepared under my
direction t � ervi. an a dance w a ,system designed to assure that qualified personnel
ft
properly'gat '�d evalaat� � t��nformation submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons ho mar the syste� �'r those persons directly responsible,for gathering the information,
the information su e best of gay knowledge and belief, truer ,accurate, and complete. l
am aware that there ant penaltiesy for subm t in false information, including the
passibility of fines and rr� tanment for knowing violations."
3. Records Retention ISupplements Section D. 6.
The prmittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR
submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the
date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time to CFR
122.41].
Page 8 of 8

Holdings,Magellan Terminals ''
Charlotte 11 Terminal
7924 Mount
Z Stream: UT to Long Creek Stream Class: WS-IV
ie anent: 11-120-(2.5) Sub -Basin: 03-08-34
e Basin: Catawba Hilt : 030501011403
y 36' 16' 59" Longitude: 800 5625"
Lid/USGS -Quad: 115SW f Mount Island Lake, NC

DENR 1 I W R / NP ES
EXPEDITED FACT SHEET - NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit NCO005185
Derek Denard, Compliance & Expedited Permittin Unit 1919- 07-6307 04Jun2015
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P./Charlotte IlTerminal
w h 4k` t One Williams Center Mid 27 Tulsa OK 74172
724 told Mt. Holly Road, Charlotte 2214
not limited
100% Industrial, fuel (bulls storage), groundwater remediation
„s PC-1 Mecklenburg
aimp­
Renewal �11
� MRO
s r 3 y
UT to Long Creek tis� . � � `. ��; � .,WS-1V
[11-120-(15)] Catawba
i.,...<, , .. to ,v, v, .,.,. ., ..�. �.': $ ,,. t.,..,,
0 w.1�Supporttnl
� t s
r
0 No
i' YV 15S
a `k 100°/0 I t. Island Lake, NC
Facility Surninary
This facility is an industrial (flow <1 MGD) collecting stormwater from a Surface -Water Pollution
Prevention System in proximity to above -ground storage tanks (ASTs). Facilities include surface bulk -
storage of petroleum hydrocarbon fuels in excess of one million gallons, fuel -truck loading racks and
discharge form a W-REM system. Significant changes to the facility include the addition of a
groundwater remediation system. The facility consists of the following wastewater treatment units:
• oil/water separators (servicing stormwater runoff from fuel loading -rack areas),
• diked areas [secondary -containment for above -ground storage tanks (ATs) with hydrocarbon fuel
capacitygreater than one million gallons]
• manually -operated discharge valves (normally closed), a point source to discharge stormwater
and city water used for washing and/or hydrostatic testing);
• ethanol off-loading skid - secondary containment with drain and automated valve (paint -source
discharge - activated In the event of product lost)
• groundwater remediation system. (Outfall 007) - an air sparge/soil extraction (AS/SVE) system,
an oil/water separator, an air stripper and up to two (2) carbon vessels.
Monthly average FLOW MGD — Last 36 months Mar 012-Feb2015:
[Ave 0.150 MGD; Maximum, Monthly average flaw = 0.413 MGD;
Minimum, Monthly average flow = 0.039]
Toxicity — This permit requires Acute Toxicity Monitoring testing; using Pi ep aler prom las to be
performed on an annual basis as a 24-hour static [TAE6C]. The facility has passed toxicity monitoring over
the past four and a half years.
xkk'e I

Cc m Hance History —The facility had frequency violations for MTBE on 06-2014, 09- 014 and 1 -2014.
For Renewal -- This permit reflects discharge at Dutfalls 006 and 007,
• added updates to facility map, otfall locations and parameter codes
• added a groundwater remediation system (intermittent) which consists of a an air sparge /soil extraction
(AS/SVE) system, an oillwater separator, an air stripper and up to two () carbon vessels to the facility
description as Outfall 007
• added effluent limitation and monitoring requirements were added for Dutfall 007 [See Section A. (2.)]
• added Monthly Average Limit of 30.0 mg/L for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) for Outfalsl 006 & 007
• for Oil & Grease, please note that [00556] remains the same for submitting DMR/eDMRj but use test
EPA. method 1664 (SGT-HEM) with results in mg/L for Dutfalls 006 & 00
• replaced Phenol (single compound) [34 94] with Total Recoverable' Phenolics [32730]; with this new
parameter there will not be a limit for C uttalls 006 & 007
• added Electronic Reporting - Discharge Monitoring Reports page Section A. (5.).
Stream — Discharge from WWTP for Outfall 006 & 007 is into an unnarned tributary to Long Creep
[Stream Segment 11-120-(2.5)]. The segment is listed a "supporting" it's parameters in the 2014 North
Carolina Integrated report and 303(d) list:
RA -- A Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) was not conducted on effluent parameters because Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) reported concentration below method -detection levels (MDLs) for the past four
and a half (4 1/2) years (>ept2011-Feb2015) of data.;
act 4dtQo
I

RCMENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrary Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
May 1, 2015
Mr. Steve Carson, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP'
P.C. Box 2218, MD -3
Tulsa, OK 74121-218
Subject: Rescission of Notice of Deficiency — Monitoring Limitation
Tracking Number: NOD-2015-MV-0025
Charlotte Terminal It
NPDES Permit NCO005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. McDorman:
n April 28, 2015, this office received a response to the above referenced Notice of Deficiency
(NOD). The NOD was issued for not monitoring MTBE during the second quarter of 2014 (April to
June) at Outfall 005. Based on the amended June 2014 DMRs received on April 28, 2015, this office
is rescinding the alcove referenced Notice of Deficiency. If you have questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Marcia Allocco ;at (704) 5-220 .
incerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources„ NCDENR
cc� Wastewater Branch
MSC 1517 -- Central files basement
R. Rozzelle, MCWQP
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave„ wife 361 Mooresville, NC 28115
Rhone. [phone] i Fax. [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-62 -6748
Internet: http;JJportal,n denr,org1weblwq
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Acton Employer - 30°ra Recycled/100% Past Consumer paper

s i ` 4h
NCDE I
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
May 19, 201
Mr, Steve Carson, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners„ L'
P.Q. Box 221, MD 27_3
Tulsa, OK 711-2186
Subject: Rescission of Notice of DeficiencyMonitoring Limitation
'Tracking Number. NOD-2015-M -0025
Charlotte Terminal 11
NPDES Permit NC O005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. MCDorman:
On April 28, 2015, this office received a response to the above referenced Notice of Deficiency
(NOD). The NOD was issued for not monitoring MTBE during the third quarter of 2014 (July to
September) at Outfall 006. Based on the amended September 2014 DMRs received on April 2
2015, this office is rescinding the above referenced Notice of Deficiency. If you have questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Marcia Allocco at (704) 2 5- 204.
Sincerely,
11 �1�44
4
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Wastewater Branch
MSC 1517 -- Central files basement
R. Roelle„ MCWC
Mooresville rtegion i Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28116
Phone: [phone] i Fax: (704) 66UO401 CustomerService: 1-877-62 -6748
Internet: http://portal.nod nr,org/web 4
An Equal Opportunity', Affirmative Action Employer— 30% Recyclal(l% Pest Consumer paper

a
Pat Me(
Govern,
North Carolina Depaftent of
/00
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
r. Steve Carson, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
P.O. Box 22186, 6, MD 27-3
Tulsa, OK 74121-21 6
Subject: Rescission of Notice of Violation -- Monitoring Limitation
Tracking Number: NOV-2015-MV-00 1
Charlotte Terminal 11
NPDES Permit NCO005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr: McDorman:
n April 28, 2015, this office received e response to the above referenced Notice of Violation (NOV).
The NOV was issued for not monitoring MTBE during the fourth quarter of 201 (October to
December) at Outfall 006. Based on the amended December 2014 DMRs received on April 28, 2015,
this office is rescinding the above referenced Notice of Violation. If you have questions concerning
this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Marcia Allocco at (704) -2204.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENFt
cc: Wastewater Branch
DISC 1617 Central files basement
R. Rozelle, MCP
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 Past Center Ave., Suite301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] C Customer Service:1-877-623-6i748
Internet: httpJ1podal,ncdenr.org1webwq
An Equal Opportunity; Affirmative Action Employer - 011/6 Recycled110% Pest Consumer paper

I ««yy
fE�CDE F'S/D F
4N
_._.. _ P Fi¢y*gg. Od..
ad, m I
MIDSTREAM PARTNERS.. L. P.
MOORES AIL LE REGIONAL OFFICE
One Williams Center
Po BOX 22186
D 2-3
Tulsa, OK 74121-21 6
April 27, 2015
V�
NC-DENH
ATTN Ms. Marcia AIIocco
10 East Center Ave. Suite 301
Mooresville,NC 28115
Re: Discharge Monitoring Repot Correction for MTBE
E
NPDES Permit No. NCO005185
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L. P. Charlotte 11 Terminal
Enclosed phase find corrections to previously submitted Discharge Monitoring Reports
for the Magellan Terminals Holdings; L. P."Charlotte 11 Terminal. The permit issued for
the terminal requires sampling for MTBE as part of discharge monitoring, While sampling
for MTBE was conducted as required by the permit,- the results were inadvertently
remitted from previously submitted reports. Attached are corrected reports reflective of
the MTBE results received from sampling. With this submission of the amended reports,
I request that the following notices be rescinded:` NOD-2015-MV-0 5, NOD- 015-M -
00 6 and NOV- 01 -M -0031
Pleaso content m4a at 18-574-731 if there tiro any questions regarding this DMR
correction submittal.
Sincerel
w
--- teve Carson
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
c: Charlotte 11 Terminal — Water Management File
Charlotte 11 Water Management File -- Tulsa
Environmental Science
C.tUsers\scarson\Documents\NC MTBE L etter,docx

t
i*,PA
AWEMMIRR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 8, 2015 R9C91Ve0/NCt)ENRMWR
CERTIFIED MAIL 701.3-2630- 0 -8998 3035>
APR 13 2015
Ti C"EIPT RE [TESTSD WOROS
MOORESVILLE ReGloNAL OFFICE
Ms. Melaniemottle, Vice President, Operations
Magellan Terminal Holdings, L.P.
One Williams Center MD 27
Tulsa, OK 74172
Subject; Request for Additional Information
Engineering Alternative Analysis (E )
DES Application NC*O00518
Charlotte 11 Terminal
Mecklenburg County
t
Dear Ms. Little:
The division has reviewed your application for the subject permit. To enable us to complete our
review in accordance with. N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 and 15A NCAC 2EI.0105, please provide additional or
revised information to address the following comments:
. Complete let revaluation of discharge alternatives:
In accordance with the Division of Water Resources policy, we must hereby return the attached
Engineering Alternative Analysis received on November 24, 2014. After a review by the
NPDES staff', the Division has determined that the EAA package lacks complete information
for the following:
a. The Division requires applicants for new and expanding discharge permits to fully document
all alternatives to surface water discharge G.S. § 143-21 .1(b)(a) and (15A NCAC" 2110105
(c)(2)). Please evaluate the feasibility of following alternatives: connection to a municipal o
regional suer collection system, subsurface disposal (including nitrification field,
filtration gallery, etc.), `,section we (in -situ or closed loop groundwater remediation
wells) and land application (drip and spray irrigation). For your reference the
"Erg rz criri llte cxtiv s say Cioid' ra Document" is enclosed. The addition
information requested should also include a present value of costs analysis as outlined in the
Division's EAA guidance. Each discharge lilts ative should be thoroughly evaluated and each
conclusion shouldbe substantiated by appropriate documents and itemized budgets
demonstrating that alternatives are cost prohibitive,
b. Please complete and return Attachment.. Local Governments Review Form (page ).: ;
1617 Gail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 7699-1617
Phone: [phone]l Internet: wwwncwaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Acuson Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

. lx
lay Zi
Division of Ws
usser, Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc., 8 Pine 'Tree
.nan [Joshua.lvlcDo an@rnagell p.com)
[ 'chael [e-mail]]
a [ arcia.allocco( ncdenr.gov]
[e-mail]]
r [Ric d: er@mec len r ca tyuc.gov]
[eward.leach(rncd .ov]

CELLAN MI[DSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P. {i
CHARLOTTE It TERMINAL �#
EN G ERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
I
This Engineering Alternatives ,Analysis (E ) has been prepared on behalf of Magellan
Midstream Partners, L.P. (Magellan) in order to request permission to discharge treated
groundwater from the groundwater remediation system at Magellan's Charlotte II Terminal
(Terminal) to the current NPDES permit (Permit C ?i 51 S) held + the terminal. The E„
Terminal is located at 7924 Fount ` Holly load and the groundwater remediation system �
equipment building is looted on the adjoining property at 8026 Mount Holly Road. in Charlotte,
Mecklenberg County, North Carolina. The proposed remediation system discharge will
discharge to the existing Terminal's outfall location via a separate ; pipe connected to the �
Terminal's outfall pipe. A Site Location Map is attached as Figure 1. '
Remediation System Ue cri tin:
Magellan is currently operating; an air sparge/soil vapor extraction (A /S'VE) system to
remediate shallow soil and groundwater from historic petroleum releases at the Terminal. The
remediation effort is regulated by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources ( CDE ).
The SVE system uses blowers to extract sail vapor and some 'liquids from below the
ground surface. The liquids (consisting of groundwater and soil vapor moisture condensate) will
have dissolved petroleum compounds typically present in gasoline and diesel. The current
�
system consists of a high vacuum blower to remove vapor and liquid from extraction wells, a
knockout drum to separate liquids from vapor, and an aboveground storage tank for temporary
storage of the recovered groundwater. Proposed additional equipment to be installed to treat the
groundwater prior to disposal to the NPDES discharge point includes an oil/water separator, an
air stripper, and up to two carbon vessels. Figure 2 is attached to provide a process flow diagram
for the existing extraction sstern and proposed treatment system.
rcarn.
Applicant Name: Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
Mailing .Address: One Williams Center MD 2
Tulsa, OK 74172
Contact Person: Joshua McDo (18) 574-7 2g
I
t.
;r
k

(1SC O) and thermal treatments are not r c
infrastructure such as pipelines.
Closed -loop groundwater remediat on well
issues discussed. with "infiltration galleries"
,ornc�mi eabili oA6lernatfv'
3
ommended ` due to potential risks to buried
s - These types of wells present the sarne
'Bove.
ited land mailability, and regulatory agency;
,ondensate group water at the Terminal are
ire not feasible at this time; therefore an
at conducted.

North Carolina Division of
Guidance Document
r Resources
ept are NPDES application for a new or
required application requirements are
submitted. A complete NPDES application will include the following items:
NPDES Application Form i triplicate)
Application Fee
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (in triplicate)
Local Government Review Fear (non -municipals only)
Failure to submit all of the required information will result in return of the; incomplete package. If you have
any questions about these requirements, contact the NPDESi Unit staff; Contact names, application forms,
applicable fees, and guidance documents are available on the NPDES website at
htt 1 rtal.ncden . ` web s s n des. Completed applications should be ailed to
NCI EN;II/D R/NPDES Complex Permitting`Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27+6-16R1`i.
Background
'lie NPI ES permit program was enacted in'1972 as part of the Clears later Act. The original goal of the, program
was to eliminate all point source discharges to surface waters by 1985. Although this goal was not achieved, the
NPDES program continues to strive toward. it. In that light, an Engineering Alternatives Analysis ( ) i
required. with any NPDES application for a new or expanding wastewater treatment plant :discharge, in
accordance with 15A NCAC 1I.010 (c)(2). In order for an NPDES application to be approved, the EAA must
provide complete justification for a direct discharge to surface water alternative, and demonstrate that direct discharge
is the most environmentally sound alternative selected from all reasonably cast -effective options [per 15A NCAC
2H.0105(c)(2A.
The purpose of this FAA Guidance Document t is to provide guidance to the regulated community for the evaluation of
wastewater disposal alternatives, The impetus behind this comprehensive guidance was leased on the following 1) a
majority of new NPDES applications were being returned as incomplete clue to inadequate FAA submissions; and 2) a
few recent court cases resulted in unfavorable rulings for the NPDES discharger clue in part to inadequate EAAs.
DWR most frequently returns EAAs as incomplete due to inadequate floe justification, inadequate alternatives
evaluations, and/or lack of documentation/references used to design and cost alternatives.
Please note that this guidance document is designed primarily for domestic wastewater discharges. For rather proposed
discharges such as water treatment plant discharges from ion exchange and reverse osmosis 'units, some alternative
disposal options may not be technologically feasible, Within a this guidance document, we have attempted to point out
where such technological limitations may exist. You are urged to review NPDES Permitting guidance documents can
the NPDES website, which discuss some of the limited disposal options for some discharges.
Please note that if a proposed municipal expansion is subject to SEPA ' Environmental Assessment
(EA)/Envirotimental Impact Statement (EIS) requirements, the EAA requirements should be incorporated into the
SEPA document.' In addition, the NPDES Unit cannot accept an application for a new/expanding NPDES discharge
until departmental review of the EPA document is complete and. a Fin' ` g of No Significant Impact (FC NSI) has
been submitted to the State Clearinghouse for circulation,
The following step -lay -step outline should be used for the preparation of all EAA submissions. If an EAA submission
lacks any of these basic elements, the NlrDES`application will be returned as incomplete.
EAA Guidance Docurnent Revision: April :201
.Foxe 1 of

(i.e., construction of a wastewater treatment plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or
subdivision ordinances. You will need to request the local government(s) to complete a Local Government Review
For (Attachment A), and include the signed and notarized form with your NP13ES application package.
A!Apph :cants
If you conclude that the proposed discharge, will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the FAA
preparation by summarizing the following general inforitiation about the proposed project:
• Provide a description of the proposed project. If the project will be constructed in Phases, provide a
schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected flow per phase (see SJTP
• Applicant name, mailing address, phone number, contact person
• Facility name, address, county., phone number, contact person
• EAA preparer's name, mailing address, phone number, contact person
STEP 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flow
Residential Pgp:)muilaaitiiqgnPmroiections.
Facilities requesting an NPDI S discharge permit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges must
document the population to be served within the service area over a 20-year planning period. The NC State.
Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on the Internet at
http,//w.demog.state.nc.us. If 21Cl-year population projections for specific areas are, not available, a linear
extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation from a linear projection
method must be clearly justified. If population projections include future annexations, include a proposed annexation
schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be met.
Municittal Flow Protections.
justification of flow a ' s well as a demonstration of need shall be providedu . Mere speculation is not sfficient. Flow
projections should represent average anticipated flows, since permit flow litnits are based on monthly averages.
Peaking factors used to design various components of the wastewater collection system (e.g., collector sewers,
interceptor sewers, pumping stations) should not be used in the justification of the average anticipated flow. For
municipal Nvaste-,,vater dischargers, flow must be justified using the Clean Water Loan Program (CWLP) Guidance for
Preaparing Engineering Reports available on the Internet at http://portal,ncdenr.org/web/wi/cleat-twater/er.
Exceptions to these flow criteria may be approved on a case -by -case basis provided adequate justification is supplied.
• Current Flow- Provide current flows includingresidential, commercial, industrial, and infiltration/inflow
(1/1) based on actual flow data or water billing records. Current residential' flow and current commercial
flow may be based on water billing records minus a 10% consumptive loss. Current industrial flow may
be based on dual metering to determine consumptive losses.
• Future Residential Flow- Provide 20-wear, residential flows based on projected residential growth.
Multiply the projected growth in residential Population by 70 gallons per day per capita.
• Future Commercial Flow- Provide 20-year commercial flows based on projected residential growth,
Multiply the projected growth in residential population by 15 gallon's per day per capita.
• L-suture _Industrial Flow- Provide flow for future documented industrial flow. A nominal allowance for
future unplanned industrial expansions may be considered by the Division, provided the basis is clearly
justified and current land -use plans and local zoning allow for such industrial growth.
Ncon- Municiml Flow Proiections.
Flow may be justified in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H .0219(l) for various activities (e.g., new subdivisions, new
schools, various commercial activities). For other proposed discharges (e.g., groundwater remediation, water
treatment plant filter backwash, industrial facilities), the flow projections will be based on engineering design
considerations and/or production projections rather than population projections.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 3 of 8

considered technologically infeasible. Please note that in -situ and closed -loop groundwater remediation
wells are permituable well types and further guidance is available through the Aquifer Protection Section.
Aside from these exceptions, you should proceed with the alternatives evaluation in accordance with the following
requirements. If you have any questions about these requiternents, contact the NISI. ES Unit staff
Al
You must evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a municipality or
other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non -Discharge Permit. All connection options should include an evaluation
of a gravity line and/or force main svith pump station(s).
1. Existing Sewera e �Sstom.
(a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lit iesw'thin a five-niile radius, or consider a greater radius, if
cost effective for the project size.
(b) Provide a preliminary indication of flow acceptance, from existing municipal or private VOWPs
under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWTP cannot accept the wastewater,
include'a letter documenting such and consider this alternative technologically infeasible.
(c) If ,in existing se-werage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the piping/pumps/resources
necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Attach a topographic map or a site
draming showing the physical route of this alternative. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per
S1EP 4,
2. Planned Sewera c S stem: Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five "le radius is projected
4---.y
to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If applicable, determine
availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate authority.
Alternative B. iLand Appfication.
Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface -systems, drip irrigation, and
spray irrigation.
t Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from a soil
evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic loading rate
and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system, including buffers.
2, Assess the availability of land, If insufficient land is available onsite, assume that the necessary land can
be purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices. Alternatively, provide
docurnentation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in the project area (include
letters from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling property),
3. Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non -discharge application system.
Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing structures, proposed
structures, and other uses within the site.
4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reel ainted water will be used by a third party.
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed Nvater system include the
potential revenue generated by selling the water.
6, Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and conclusions.
T Note: The design of land application systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified
in 15A NCAC 2`17.05 or 15A NCAC 18,A.1900.
S. Note: Proposed discharges frog groundwater reniediation systems must evaluate the potential for an
infiltration gallery treatment alternative,
Alternative C. Wastewater Reuse.
You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated, Sorne municipalities are currently reusing
wastewater within the confines of their t"Vf? property for irrigation, toilet flushing, backwashing, etc., while other
municipalities ha-ve established progressive reuse programs for residential irrigation. Reuse applications'might include
golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g,, hardwood or pine plantation, grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape
uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land
Application. The design of reclaimed water systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in
15A NCAC 2U.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 5 of 8

Or
• Laboratory costs assurning a weekly monitoring regime for discharge systems and a monthly regime for
non -discharge systems
• Operator and support staff costs
• Residual disposal costs
• Connection fees and subsequent user fees
• Permit and compliance fees
• Utility oasts (power, water, etc.)
leo, �tQ �ortuni �Qosta
PATCA Calculation Method.
The following standard formula for computing the`'present value must be used in all cost estimates made under this
evaluation:
C
P V = C"' +
t-1 Q + r)'
Where:
PV Present value of costs.
Co Costs incurred in the present year.
Ct = Costs incurred in time t.
t = Time period after the present year (The present year is t = 0)
n Ending year of the life of the facility.
r Current EPA discount rate. EPA adjusts this rate, annually on October 1, and it can be accessed from
the Internet at http:/www.nccgl.net/fap/cwsrf/201gui,httnl.
If recurring costs are the same in years I through 20, then Ct=C and the formula reduces to:
�1 + ry
PV= C" +
� r(I + rf
As an example, assuming capital costs (Co) of $2 million, annual recurring costs (C) of $40,000, and a discount rate (r)
of 5.625%, the 20-year (n=20) present value of costs would equal:
PV= capital costs + recurring costs X [(1 +0.05625)20 — 11 / [0,05625(1 +0.05625)20
PV= $2,000,000 + $40,000 X [1.98X16b1
PV= $2,000,000 + $471,428
PV= $2,471,428
PVCA Summary Table.
The E AA niust include a Surnmary Cost 'fable, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all technologically
feasible wastewater alternatives. J'he summary should include a breakdown of capital costs and recurring costs. In
some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for some alternatives, or possibly collect
actual soil data to better characterize the land application alternative. Ultimately, the final determination on cost
effectiveness is made by the Division with consideration of monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 7 of 8

FV A
Atjo2f*
A�=mW
NCDE RR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 7, 20 15 RECEIVEDINCDENRIDWR
CERTIFIED MAIL 7013-2630-0001-8998-3035 APR
RETURN RECEIPTUESTE
Ms. MelanieLittle, "Vice President, Operations MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Magellan Terrninal Holdings, L.P.
One Williams Center MD 27
Tulsa, OK 74172
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Engineering Alternative Analysis (E
I PT ES Application NCO005185
Charlotte 11 Terminal
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms.little.
The Division has reviewed your application for the subject permit, To enable us to complete our
review in accordance with N,C.C1.S. 4 -215.1 and 15A NCAC" 2H.0105, please provide additional or
revised information to address the following comments:
1. Complete evaluation of discharge alternatives:
In accordance with the Division of "Water Resources policy, we must hereby return the attached
Engineering Alternative Analysis received can November 24, 2014. After a review by the
NPTIES staff, the Division has determined that the EAA package lacks complete information
for the following (Please see enclosed for your reference page 3, itern 10 in the NCG51 0000
Application).
The Division requires applicants for new and expanding discharge permits to fully document
all alternatives to surface water discharge C . S. § 143-215.1(b)(a) and (15A NCAC 2H.01 05
(c)(2)). Please evaluate the feasibility of fallowing alternatives: connection to a municipal o
regional sewer collection system, subsurface disposal (including nitrification field,
filtration gallery, etc.), injection wells (in -situ or closed loop groundwater re e "anon
wells) and land application (drip and spay irrigation). The alternatives to discharge
analysis should include boring logsand/or other information indicating that a subsurface
system is neither feasible nor practical as well as written confirmation indicating that
connection to a POTW is not an option. For your reference the "Enzineerinz Alternatives
Anal sis Guidance Document" is enclosed. For the connection to a P TW alternative,
please complete and rem Attachment A. Local Governments Review Form (page 8). The
addition infra anon requested should also include a present value of costs analysis as outlined.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] t Internet: a ww,ncwaterquality.or
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer -- Made in part by recycled paper

MAGELLAN MIDSTREA
CHARLOTTEH'
ENGMERING ALTERN
I PARTNERS, L.P.
ERMINAL
XIVES ANALYSIS
equipment building is located on the adjoining property at zsuzo iviounruony Koau in t,narioue,
Mecklenberg County, North Carolina. The proposed remediation system discharge will
discharge to the existing Terminal's outlall location via a separate pipe connected to the
Terminal's outlall pipe. A Site Location Map is attached as Figure 1.
Remediation Svstem Descrintion:
Magellan is currently operating an air sparge/soil vapor extraction (AS/SVE) system to
remediate shallow soil and groundwater from historic petroleum releases at the Terminal. The
remediation effort is reguhued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR).
The SVE system uses blowers to extract soil vapor and some liquids from below the
ground surface. The liquids (consisting of groundwater and soil vapor moisture condensate) will
have dissolved petroleum compounds typically present in gasoline and diesel. The current
system consists of a high vacuum blower to remove vapor and liquid from extraction wells, a
knockout drum to separate liquids from vapor, and an aboveground storage tank for temporary
storage of the recovered groundwater. Proposed additional equipment to be installed to treat the
groundwater prior to disposal to the NPDES discharge point includes an oil/water separator, an
air stripper, and up to two carbon vessels. Figure 2 is attached to provide a process flow diagram
for the existing extraction system and proposed treatment system,
ARRUIcant.
Applicant Name: Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
Mailing Address: One Williams Center MD 27
Tulsa, OK 74172
Contact Person: Joshua McDorman [phone]

(ISCO) and the al treatments are not recommended due to potential risk's to buried
infrastructure such as pipelines.
Closed -loop groundwater remediation wells - These types of wells present the same
issues discussed with "infiltration galleries" above.
Economic Feasibilitv of Alternatives:
Due to current existing infrastructure, land uses, limited land availability, and regulatory agency
constraints, discharge options for treated moisture condensate/groundwater at the Terminal are
very limited. The alternatives discussed above are not feasible at this time; therefore an
economic feasibility evaluation of alternatives was not conducted.
3

(i.e., construction of a wastewater treattrtent plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or
subdivision ordinances. You will need to request the local government(-,) to complete a Local Government Review-
Form (Attachment A), and include the signed and. notarized form with your NPDES application package.
a.t p cants
If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the 1 A
preparation by summarizing the following general information about the proposed project:
• Provide a description of the proposed project. if the project will be constructed in phases, provide'a
schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected flow per phase (see S EP 2):
• Applicant name, mailing address, phone number, contact person
■ Facility name, address, county, phone number, contact person
• FAA preparer's name, mailing address, phone number, contact person
STEP . Provide reasonable le r© :cti n yr population and flow
Residential Population Prqjgg1iqqs,
Facilities requesting an; NPDES discharge pertnit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges must
document the population to be served within the service area over a 29-year planning period. 1"The NC State
Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on the Internet at
http://www,demog.state.nc.us. If 20-year 'population projections for specific areas are not available, a linear
extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation from a linear projection
method must be clearly justified. If population projections includefuture annexations, include a proposed annexation
schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be met.
mmnici l ct v Ptojw ction .
,Justification of flow as well as a demonstration of deed shall be provided... Mere speculation is not sufficient. Flaw
projections should represent average anticipated flows, since permit flow limits are based can monthly averages.
Peaking factors used to design various components of the wastewater collection system (e.g., collector sewers,
interceptor sewers, purriping stations) should not be used in the justification of the average anticipated flow. For
municipal wastewater dischargers, flow roust be justified using the Clean Water loan Program (C P) Guidance for
Preaparing Engineering Reports available on the Internet at b,ttp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wi/cleanwater/er.
Exceptions to these flow criteria may be approved on a case -by -case basis provided adequate justification is supplied.
• Current Flow- Provide current flows including residential, commercial, industrial, and infiltration/inflow
(1/1) based on actual flow data or water billing records. Current residential' flow and current commercial
flow may be based' on water billing records minus a 10% consumptive loss. Current industrial flow may
be based on dual metering to determine consumptive losses.
• Future Re idential Flow- Provide 20-year residential flows based on projected residential growth,
Multiply the projected growth in residential population by 71 gallons per day per capita.
• Future _Conitnercial Flow- Provide 20-year cornmercial flows based on projected residential ;growth.
Multiply the projected growth in residential population by 15 gallons per day per capita..
• Future Industrial Blow- Provide flow for future documented industrial flowv. A nominal allowance for
future unplanned industrial expansions may be considered by the Division, provided the basis is clearly
justified and current land -use plans and local zoning allow for such industrial growth.
Non-Municiml Flow Protections.
Flow may be justified in accordance with 15A NCAC 211 .0219(1) for various activities (e.g., new subdivisions, new
schools, various commercial activities). For other proposed discharges (e.g., groundwater remediation, , water
treatment plant filter back -wash, industrial facilities), the flow projections will be lased on engineering design
considerations and/or production projections rather than population projections.
EAA GuidanceDocument Revision: April 2014
Page 3 of 8

A
AM
considered technologically infeasible. Please of that in -situ and closed -loop groundwater remediation
wells are permittable Nvell types and further guidance is available through the Aquifer Protection Section.
Aside from these exceptions, you should proceed with the alternatives evaluation in accordance with the following
requirements. If you have any questions about these requirements, contact the NPDES Unit staff
You must evaluate, the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a municipality or
other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non -Discharge Permit. All connection options should include an evaluation
of a gravity line and/or force main with pump station(s).
1. Existing e Sewera4S sterrsterna:--y.,
(a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lines within a five -mile radius, or consider a greater radius if
cost effective for the project size.
(b) Provide a preliminary indication of flour acceptance from existing municipal or private WWFPs
under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWrP cannot accept the wastewater,
include a letter documenting such and consider this alternative technologically infeasible,
(c) If an existing sewerage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the piping/pumps/resources
necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Attach a topographic map or a site
drawing showing the physical route of this alternative. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per
S'IEP 4.
2. Planned Sewerage Systern- Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five mile radius is projected
to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If applicable, determine
availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate authority.
Alternative B. Land ADDlicaton.
Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip irrigation, and
spray irrigation.
1, Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic, loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from a soil
evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic loading rate
and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system, including buffers.
2. Assess the availability of land. If insufficient land is available onsite, assume that the necessary land call
be purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices. Alternatively, provide
docurrientation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in the project area (include
letters from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling property).
1 Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non -discharge application system.
Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing structures, proposed
structures, and other uses uithin the site.
4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reclaimed water will be used by a third party.
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed water system include the
potential revenue generated by selling the water.
C. Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and conclusions,
7. Note: The design of land application systems must meet: the treatment and design requirements specified
in 15A NCAC 2T .05 or 15A NCAC 18A. 1900.
8. Note. Proposed discharges from groundwater remediation systerris must evaluate the potential for an
infiltration gallery treatment alternative.
Alternative C. WastewatetR_euse.
You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated. Some municipalities are currently reusing
wastewater within the confines of theirWT`P property for irrigation, to flushing, hack -washing, etc., while, other
municipalities have established progressive revise programs for residential irrigation. Reuse applications might include
golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood or pine plantation, grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape
uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land
Application. The design of reclaimed water systems rim st meet the treatment and design requirements specified in
15A NCAC 2U.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 5 of 8

• Laboratory costs assuming a vreek-ly monitoring regime for discharge systems and a monthly regime for
non -discharge systems
• Operator and support staff costs
• Residual disposal costs
• Connection fees and subsequent user fees
• Permit and compliance fees
• Utility costs (power, water, etc.)
PVCA CalcLilgfion Method.
The following standard formula for computing the present value must be used in all cost estimates made under this
evaluation:
C
P V = C,, 4-
t=J +
VVIlere:
PV Present value of costs.
Co Costs incurred in the present year.
Ct Costs incurred in time t.
t = Thne period after the present year the present year is t 0)
n Ending year of the life of the facility.
r Current EPA discount rate. EPA adjusts this rate annually on October 1, and it can be accessed from
the Internet at http:/www.iiccgl.net/fap/cw,,;rf/201gai.html.
If recurring costs are the same in years 1 through 20, then Ct=C and the formula reduces to:
PV= C' + �1 +Y r— 11
Ct r(I + r)" I
As an example, assuming capital costs (Co) of $2 million, annual recurring costs (C) of $40,000, and a discountrate W
of 5.625%, the 20-year (n=20) present value of costs would equal:
PV= capital costs + recurring costs X [(1 +0.05625)20 — 1] / [005625(1+0.05625)20 J
PV= $2,000,000 + $40,000 x [1.98/0.168]
PV= $2,000,000 + $471,428
PV= $2,471,428
PVCA Summary Table.
Tbe EAA must include a Su wry Cost Table, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all technologically
feasible wastewater alternatives. The sunitnan, should include a breakdown of capital costs and recurring costs. In
some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for some alternatives, or possibly collect
actual soil data to better characterize the land application alternative. Ultimately, the final deternimation on cost
effectiveness is made by the Division with consideration of monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 7 of 8

AA 64
FILE
71*7FA)
rr
/^w
North Carolina Department Of Environment and Natural Resource
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
GovernorSecretary
April 21, 2015
Mr. ,Josh McDorman, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
P.C. Box 22185, MD 27-3
Tulsa, OK 74121-2186
Subject. Reissuance of recent correspondence
Charlotte Terminal 11
NPD S Permit `NCO0 5185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mcporman:'
Phase find the enclosed correspondence that was returned to our office as undeliverable by the U.S.
Postal Service. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions phase do not
hesitate to contact Ms. Marcia Allocco or myself at (704) 853-15 9.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NC ENR
Enclosures:
NOD-2015-MV-0025
NOD-2015-MV-0028
NV-2015-MV-0031
cc: R. Roelle, MCWQP
Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 -- ventral Files Basement
Mooresville Regional Office
Location 610 Past Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone; (704) 66-1 t Fax: (704) 6 . 0401 CustomerService: 1-8 7-623-67 8
Internet. htt :11 rtal.ncdenr o /ot iNr
An Equal Opportunity ; Affirmative Action Employer — 30 Recycled/1 00/6 Post Consumer paper

CIO PM
lellanlp.com
Marcia; Bell, Wes; Richard.Farmer@mecklenburgcountync gov;
west for EAA NPDES i CO00518
005185 acid info 04-0 -1 pdf
for a modification adding a groundwater remediation
inal Holdings, LP -Charlotte If Terminal. The additional
knalysis (EAA),
'ly,
Denard
.,. ,. correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public ;Records Law and mav be
disclosed to third ;parties:
t

MAGELLAN
CHARLOTTE
f,NG,INEERING ALTERN
vam" Partners, L.P.
,1r MD 27
r

PPPPPP"
Engineening Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guddance Document
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
N( TE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) will not accept an NPDES application for a new or
expanding wastervater treatment platit discharge tut on ess all the required applicatirequirements are
u sbmitted. A complete NI' DESapplication will include the following items:
NPDES Application Foun (in ttiplicate)
Application Fee
Engineering Alternatives Analysis in triplicate)
Local Government Review Form (non -municipals only)
Failure to submit all of the required information will result in return of the incomplete package. If yor have
I to
any questions about these requirements, contact the NPDES Unit staff. Contact names, application forms,
C'
applicable fees, and guidance docunterius are available on the NPDES weltsite at
Veb Completed applications should be If
le
'9
NCDENX/DWR/NPDES Complex Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Background
The, NIDES pernut prograin was enacted in'1972 as part of the Clean W'ater Act. 'I'lic original goal of the pr%rrani
was to eluninate all point source discharges to smrfiace eater,, by 1985. 20thougli thig goal was not achieved, the
NPDES program contemes to strive toxinard it, In that light, an Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) is
required with any NPDES application for as new or expanding wastewater treatment plant discharge, ill
accordance with IiA NCAC 211,0105(c)(2). In order foran NPDES application to be approved, t1le EAA triust
provide completeJustification for a direct discharge to surface water alternative, and demonstwe that direct discharge
is die most environmentally sound Aternative selected from all reasonably cost-effective options 4:)er 15A NCAC
21-1.0105(c)(2)].
The purpose of tbisf�'AA Guidance Document is to provide uidance to the regulated community for the evaluation of
waste-,vater disposal alternafivcs. The impttus behind this comprebensive bruidance was based on the folloN-ving-, 1) a
majority of new, NPI)ES applicationswere being returned as incomplete due to inadequate EAA submissions, And 2) at
few recent court. cases resulted in unfavorable rulings for the NPDF,,S dischargLr due in part to inadequate E!,.AAs.
DVIR most frequently returns F�;XAs as incomplete clue to inadequate flow justification, inadequate alternatives
evaluations, and/or back of docurnentation/references used to design and cost Alternative,--,.
Please mote that this guidance docurnent is designed primarily for domestic wastewater discharges. For other proposed
discharges such as Nvater treatment plant discharges from ion exchange and reverse ()smosis units, some alternative
dispowsal c,)ptions may not be teclitiologically feasibleWidrin this guidance &,)curnent, Nve have attempte-d to point Out
,vhere such technological limitations may exist, oast are urged tx>review NPDES pernutting guidance documents oil
the NPDES website, which discuss soiree of the limited disposal optkxis for son -le discharges.
Please note that if a proposed municilutl expansion is subject to SEPA Environmental Assessment
(RA)/Environrnental Irnixact State rnent (EI'S) requirements, the 1-7.A.A requiwinents should be incolporated into the
SEPA document, In addition, tyre NPDES t4nt cannot accept an application for as new/expanding, NP13ES'di scharge
until departmental review of the SEPA docutnent is complete and a 14nding of No Sigifficant linpact (FONSI) has
been submitted to the State Clearing ,house for circulation,
The f6UoNving step-by-step oudine should be used for the preparation of all E'A.A subinissions, If an EAA submis-sion
lacks any of these basic elements, the NPDI,4,S application will be rettimed as incornplete.
EIIAGuidanceDocunwnt Revision: April 2014
Page I of 8

:don of a waste. -water treaattaaettt plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or
,rcltta LacesYou will need to request the local government(s) to cetza plete as Local Government Review
htnent and include the signed aata l tie ntri7ed fctrtrs uith your NPDES application package,
We that the prtapeasecl discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" c lte:tiaa, then begin the EAA
aataatazaar zing the fcalfcoeing general information about the proposed project:
applicant name, Maatlita atcldr ss, phone n'utnber, contact person
a cillty mate, address,county, phone number, contact person
1.malrc ,32cc number, contact �er�at ea , t
Provide reasonable projections for population and flo
tct .
,l local zoning allour for such industrial growth,
and/or production projections rather than popuLation projections.
EAA Guidance Dacume7it Reveiiory April20,1
Page 3 cat"

r lf"L M.
NCDE AR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
March 9, 201
Mr. Josh McDorman, EnvironmentalSpecialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
7924 Mt. Holly lead
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Monitoring Limitation
Tracking No. N D-201 -M -0026
Charlotte Terminal 11
NPDES Permit No. NCO00518
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. M Dorrman:
review of the July to September 2014 self -monitoring; report for the subject facility revealed a
violation of the following parameter at Outf ll 006:
Date Parameter R222q2AYALM2 on torinc a ire eitt
/30/14 MTBE Nome Monitor quarterly
Remedial actions; if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the causes(s) of the noted
violation. Unresolved violations may lead to the issuance of a Notice of Violation and/or assessments
of civil penalties by the Division of Water Resources,
If the violations are due to a transcription error (data left off the DM) please submit an amended
DM# (two copies) to this Office along with a cover letter asking for rescission of the Notice of
Deficiency. Please address your correspondence to M. Marcia Allocco at the letterhead address.
Thank you for your attention to this matter: If you have questions concerning this matter please do
not hesitate to contact lbs. All cco at (704) 235- 2 4.
cerely;
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
c: R. Rozzelle, MCWQP
Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Central Files Basement
A
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave,, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 2 116
Phone: [phone] t Fax; (704) 66 -60040 t Customer Service: 1-877-23-674
Internet: httosportal.nodenr.omI
A. P-.f t Aff;-mi- A,iii m r-i-r - rood Giarvnfarm t7o P-f rnna.- n rwr

A 4 70
dMammllllllmllml
CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaat
Governor Secretary
March 9, 201
r. Josh McDorrnan, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
7924 Mt. Holly Read
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Monitoring Limitation
Tracking No. NOD-2015-MV-0025
Charlotte Terminal 11
NPD S Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. cDorman:
review of the April to June 2014 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of
the following parameter at Outfall 00 :
Date Parameter Rer)orted Value Mon itorin e dire e t
/30/14 MTBE done Monitor quarterly
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the causes(s) of the noted
violation. Unresolved violations may lead to the issuance of s Notice of Violation' and/or assessments
of civil penalties by the Division of Water Resources.
If the violations are due to a transcription error (data left off the DMR) please submit an amended
D (two copies) to this Office along with "a cover letter asking for rescission of the Notice of
Deficiency. Please address your correspondence to M. Marcia Allccco at the letterhead address.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions concerning this matter please do
not hesitate to contact Ms. Allocco at [phone].
>incerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: R. Rozzelle, MCWQP
Wastewater Branch
MSC 11 — Central Files Basement
A
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] t Fax: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet h :fl rtal.ncdenr.o IwebN
An Eaual 0000rtunity � Affirmative Action ErnDl ver — 30% Recveled/10% Post Cons{imar nar .r

lgw .
R""BE""No"R11
North Carolina department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der mart
Governor Secretary
March 9, 2015
r. Josh McDorran, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
7924 Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, forth Carolina 28214
Subject: Notice of Violation — Monitoring iol ti n
Tracking No.. Nt V-2015--p9 1
Charlotte 'Terminal 1
NPI ES Permit No. NCO0 5 85
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. McDorman:
A review of the October to December 2014 self -monitoring reports for the subject facility
revealed a monitoring violation of the following parameter at Outfall 006
ate Parameter Reported Value€ nitorin a uire ent
12 3'1/14 MTSE None Monitor quarterly
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The Division
of Water Resources may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additionalviolations.
If the violations are due to a transcription error (data left off the DMF) please submit an amended
DMR (two copies) to this Office along with -a cover letter asking for rescission of the Notice of
Deficiency. Please address your correspondence to Ms. Marcia Allocco at the letterhead address.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Marcia Allocco or
me at (704) 663- 699.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: R. Rozzelle, MCWQP
Wastewater Branch
Central Files (MSC 1 7-basement)
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, ville, NC 26116
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] t Customer Service: 1-877-623-674
Internet h tp:ilportal,ncdenr,org/Webtwaq

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT F4 - Mier Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Mail the complete application. to:
N. C. Department of Environment'' and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161'
NPDES Permit Number NC4Q518
Please print or type.
1Contact Information:
Owner Name Magellan Terminal Holdings, L.P.
Facility Name Charlotte ll Terminal
Mailing Address One Williams Center MD 27
City Tulsa
State / Zip Code Cal, 7417
Telephone Number 918-574-79 8
Fax Number 18-574-77 0
QU
e-mail. Address Joshua. McDoran agellanl .co I t l
. Location of facility producing discharge.
Check here if same as above
Street Address or State Road 7924 Mount Holly Road
City Charlotte
State / Zip Cade North Carolina, 28214
County Mecklenburg
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or rather entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referTing to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or t RCS
Dame Magellan Terminal Holdings, L.P.
Nailing Address 7924 Old Mt. Holly Road
city Charlotte
State / ;;dip Cade North Carolina, 28214
Telephone Number (704) 99-6331
Fax Number [phone]
4. Ownership Status:
Federal U State [
Page 1 of
Private El Public [_j
C-MI 10/0

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION — SHORT FORM C — Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial' facilities.
S. Standard. Industrial Classification (SIG) cod (s)z 4226
6. Number of employees: 3
7. Describe the treatment system List all installed wash treatment components with capacities;
describe the processes that generate wastewaters. If the space prorrided is not sufficient attach ex
separate sheet of paper udth the system description:
Magellan currently operates a water pollution control system (outfall 00 ) consisting of
the following.
• Oil/water separators (servicing storm water runoff from fuel loading rack areas)
• Diked areas (secondary containment for aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) with
hydrocarbon fuel capacity greater than one million gallons)
• Manually operated discharge valves (normally closed), a paint source to
discharge storm water and city water used for washing and/or hydrostatic
testing'
• Ethanol off-loading skid -- secondary containment with a drain and automated
valve (point -source discharge - activated in the event of product lost
Additionally, An air sparge/sail vapor extraction (AS/SUE) system is currently operating
to remediate shallow soil and groundwater from historic petroleum releases at the Terminal.
The remediation effort is regulated by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCIENR).
The SVE system eases blowers; to extract sail vapor and some liquids from below the ground
surface. The liquids (consisting of groundwater and soil vapor moisture condensate) will have
dissolved petroleum compounds typically present in gasoline and diesel. The current system
consists of a high vacuum blower to remove vapor and liquid from extraction wells, a knockout
drum to separate liquids from vapor, and an aboveground storage tank for temporarystorage
of the recovered groundwater. Proposed additional equipment to be installed to treat the
groundwaterprior to disposal to the NPDES discharge point includes an oil/water separator,
an air ~stripper, and up to two carbon vessels (if necessary). Average flow through the system is
anticipated to be approximately 5 gallons per minute ( m); which includes instantaneous
batch discharges of approximately 20 gp (outfall 007).
S. Is facility covered under federal effluent limitationguidelines? No ® Yes El
If yes, specify the category'
9. Principal product(s) produced: No products are produced
Principal rraw material(s) consumed: :None
Paige 2 of 5 C- i 10/0

x x"
x NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION — SHORT FORM C — Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Briefly describe the manufacturing process(es):
No manufacturing occurs at the site, however, in addition to storm water runoff and water used for
hydrostatic testing, the following describes the process which generates wastewater to be discharged:
An AS f SVE system is currently operating to remediate shallow soil and groundwater from historic
petroleum releases at the site. The St1E system uses blowers to extract sail vaporand some liquids
from below the ground surface.: The liquids (consisting of groundwater and soil vapor moisture
condensate) will have dissolved petroleum compounds typically present in gasoline and diesel. The
current system consists of a high vacuum blower to remove vapor and liquid from extraction wells, a
knockout drum to separate liquids, from vapor, and an aboveground storage tank for temporary storage
of the recovered groundwater.
. Amount of principal product produced or raw material consumed
nisi s eci c ar ounts.consumed and/`or units ca roc ction over the last tree ears
`Product Produced or Material Product` Produced or w Material
Consumed` Consumed
VE E FI�AI{
fast day � 0
per Month 0 o
per Year
11. Frequency of discharge: Continuous Intermittent
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: varies Duration: varies
12. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only
Discharge Flow
,GALLONS
i'ER DAY
Sanitary - monthly; average C}
Utility water, etc.monthly average 0
Process water - monthly average {
tormwater -- monthly average 154,000
Other - monthly average
Explain: remediation system discharge - 73 (7,200 estimated peak average)
current average and estimated peak
avera e.
Monthly Average 154,073
total discharge (all types)
13. Number of separate discharge points: 2 Outfall Identification number(s) 00
to water 007 remediation s stem
Page 3 of 5 C-MI 10108

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION — SHORT FORM C — Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
14. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude/:
Unnamed tributary to Lone Creek See Figure 1
15. Effluent Data [for new or proposed discharges]
Provide data for the parameters listed. Temperature and pH shad be grab samples, for all other parameters : 4-hour
composite sampling shall be used. If more, than one analysis is reported, report daily maximum and monthly average.
If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum.
NOTE: Permittees requesting renewal should complete the table ONLYfor the parameters
rrentl monitored. Summarize the 3 ears o e cent data
Parameter Daily Monthly Units of
Maximum Average Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) N/A N/A N/A
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) N/A N/A N/A
Total Organic Carbon N/A N/A N/A
Total Suspended Solids 5.00 3.5 /l
Ammonia as N N/A N/A N/A
Temperature ;(Summer) N/A N/A N/A
Temperature (Winter) N/A NA N/A
pH N/A N/A N/A
Fecal Colifo (If sanitary waste is N/A N/A N/A
present)
Total Residual Chlorine (if chlorine is N/A N/A N/A
used)
1. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications (check all that apply and provide permit
numbers or check norm* if not applicable):
'hype Permit Number Type Permit Number
Hazardous Waste (RC ) None NESHA S (CAA) None
UIC (SDWA) Noe Ocean Dumping (MPRSA) None
PDES NC00051.1 5 Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CW ) None
PSD (CAA) None Other None
Non -attainment program (CAA) None
. List any chemicals that ' may be discharged (Please list and explain source and potential
amounts.)
.)
The site is a petroleum bulk storage facility that operates a surface water pollution
prevention system (outfall 006). The following petroleum -related chemicals may be
discharged:
Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, oil & grease, methyl -tent -butyl -ether (MTBE),
phenol, and naphthalene. A. summary of analytical results of these compounds for the bast
three years is provided in liable 1.
Page 4 of 5 C-MI 10108

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION- SHORT FMinor Industrial
Minor industrial,'manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Additionally, a petroleum groundwater remediation system will be operating at the site
(outf 007). Analytical results from a sample collected from the condensate holding tank
on March 13, 2014 dice not have any detections of petroleum compounds except for MTBE
(6.4 g/L) (Table 2)
The following maximum concentrations have been detected in groundwater samples
collected in the area where the remediation system is operating:
Benzene (,000 ug/I), toluene (9,000 ug/L) ethylbe ene (1600 ug/L),
Xylenes (26,000 ug/L), MTBE (44,000 ug/L), 1,2-dichloroethane (2,000 ug/L),
Napthalene (1,600 ug/L).
The concentrations listed above are pre-treatment concentrations and should be considered
as worst case. The groundwater remediation system condensate will typically resemble the
March 2014 sample from the holding tank. A summary of groundwater analytical results
from June 2014 is provided in Table 3,
18. Is this facility located on Indian country" (check cane)
Yes El No JZ
19. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
hest of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed nameof Person Signing Title
d-Ac� 12-11111(4
Sign ti e of Applicant mate
North Carolina: General Statute 1 3-215.6 (b)(2) provides that; Any person who knowingly males any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or bath,
for a similar offense,)
Page 5 of 5 C-Ml 10/ l8

im
P646dary
4l#
MMM YMM YMIMWY reel
NNIX
<
n mew s e c.
4 State GridiQuad. F15SW ! Mt. Island Lake, NC
Eatllude. 35.2S3tl5 LorigatudE:-80.94028
Receiving Stream: UT to tang Creek III-120-(Z5)I Stream Glass: WSAV
Drainage in: Catawba River Basin Sub -Basin. 03-N-34
Prepitted BY MAGELLAN TERMINAL
L,EGGGETTE, BRA HEARS & GRAHAM, INC. CHARLOTTE TERI
Professional Groundwater and CHARLOTTE NORTH
Ltivironmental Engineering Services SITE i ATII
S Pine Tree Drive, Sprite 250 NPDES PERMIT Nt
St. Paul, Minnesota 55 112
{651j44014Us FILE: g3rnagcherl101f.,MXD it}ITE: 1112

TABLE I
MAGELLAN TERMINAL HOLDINGS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE It TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SUMMARY OF EFFLUENT FLOW AND ANALYTICAL DATA (2011 TO 2014)
Flow TSS Benzene MTBE Phenol Naphthalene Oil &Grease Xylenes Toluene Ethylbemene Turbidity
Sam [in Date MGD mg/L ug/L PITA pg/L MR/L mg/L pg/L pg/L pl/L , NTU
8/2/2011
0.0291
<2.8
< 5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5,0
<5:0
<5.0
<5b
4,600
8/5/2011
0Z843
8/8/2011
0.4101
8/15/2011
0.0928
9/6/2011
0.3084
9/23/2011
0.0035
9/26/2011
0,0745
<15
<5.0
<5Z
<5Z
<5Z
<5.0
<5.0
<SZ
6,200
9/30/2011
0.0886
<10.0
10/21/2011
0.0955
<2.5
<5Z
<5.0
<10.0
<5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5Z
< 5.0
9400
11/7/2011
01330
<2.6
< sk
<5.0
<5Z
< 5,0
< 5,0
< 5,0
< 5.0
< 5.0
SA00
11/23/2011
0.1014
12/8/2011
OA371
4.000
<5.0
<5.0
<5,0
<5Z
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5Z
15A00
12/22/2011
0.0901'
1/10/2012
0A970
<2.5
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<SZ
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5,0
3.200
1/23/2012
0,2657
2/22/2012
0.0462
<15
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
< sk
< 5.0
< 5,0
< 5.0
< 5.0
6.600
3/5/2012
0.1767
5.000
<5.0
<5Z
<5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5,0
< 5.0
< 5.0
18.600
4/12/2012
0Z671
<2.5
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5.0
<5O
<5.0
<1.0
5/9/2012
0.1701
5/14/2012
0.4285
5/21/2012
0A511
<2:5
< 5:0
<5.0
<5.0
< 5.0
< 510
< sk
< 5.0
< 5.0
<14
5/23/2012
0.1895
5/31/2012
0.1681
611512012
0.0806
<2.5
<5Z
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5,0
<5Z
<5.0
<5.0
1.600
7/3/2012
0.0730
7/13/2012
0.0548
<2,5
<5:0
<5.0
<5Z
<5Z
<5.0
<5,0
<5.0
<5.0
1,600
7/17/2012
0,2945
7119/2012
0,1643
8/6/2012
0.1944
8/10/2012
01204
<sk
<5.0
<5.0
<&o
<5.0
<5Z
<&O
<5.0
<5Z
9.00
8/2712012
0,1114
9/14/2012
0Z543
<5Z
<&O
<5.0
<5.0
<&O
<&O
<&O
<5.0
<5,0
1,400
9/18/2012
0.0941
10/512012
0Z965
<5Z
<5Z
<5Z
<5,0
< &0
< &0
< 5Z
< &0
< 5.0
1000
12/21/2012
03137
12/27/2012
0Z830
1600
<5,0
<&O
<&O
<5,0
<5.0
<&O
<5Z
<&O
9.400
12/31/2012
0.0281
1/11/2013
0.0344
<2,5
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5Z
<5.0
<5Z
1900
1117/2013
01702
1/19/2013
0,1367
1/2812013
0.0910
2/7/2013
0.0874
2/13/2013
OA088
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
8.900
2/25/2013
0Z693
2/26/2013
0A896
3/11/2013
0W94
3.400
<&O
<5.0
<&O
<5.0
<5.0
<5Z
<5.0
<5.0
11.400
3/13/2013
0.1188
4/4/2013
0Z169
4/5/2013
0.2778
4/16/2013
0V77
<2.5
<5:0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<&O
<&O
2A00
4/29/2013
0.2266
5/2/2013
0.0671
<2,5
<&O
<&O
<&O
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<&O
<5Z
2100
5/6/2013
r 01671
6/3/2013
03185
6/612013
0.0094
6/10/2013
0.0905

TABLE I
MAGELLAN TERMINAL HOLDINGS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE It TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SUMMARY OF EFFLUENT FLOW AND ANALYTICAL DATA 12011 TO 2014)
Flow TSS Benzene MTSE Phenol Naphthalene Oil & Grease Xylenes Toluene Ethyl benzene Turbidity
Sampling Date MGD m#/L pjjLL�g/l. PBIL mg/L., Mg/L lig/L lig/L Eg/l. NTU
6j11/4043
0.1936
3.400
<5.0
<5,0
<5.0
<5,0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
6,200
6/18/2013
0.1672
6/21/2013
0k433
7/1/2013
0.2197
7/5/2013
04552
7/912013
0.0855
<2.5
<5k
<5k
<5.0
<5k
<5.0
<5,0
<5.0
<5k
3100
7/11/2013
63081
7/25/2013
0.2132
8/13/2013
0.0328
8/15/2013
0,0243
3100
<5k
<5k
<5,0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< sk
< &0
2.800
8/30/2013
0.0585
9/23/2013
0.1498
9/24/2013
0.1346
<5.0
<&()
<5,0
<5,0
<50
<5.0
<5.0
<&O
<&O
4.400
12/3/2013
03163
<2t5
<5,0
<5k
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2,0
4.000
12/12/2013
01253
12/16/2013
OkWO
12/23/2013
0.3271
12/26/2013
0.1241
12/31/2013
0.2116
1/10/2014
0J302
<2.5
<10
<5.0
<5.0
<50
<5k
<5.0
<2.0
<10
5,400
1/13/2014
03061
2/17/2014
0,0780
2/18/2014
0A190
<5k
<2.0
<Sk
<&O
<5k
<5.0
<5,0
<2.0
<2,0
6.000
3/7/2014
0.2805
3/11/2014
0.1202
3,300
<2k
<&()
<5,0
<&()
<&()
<5.0
<2,0
<2k
7,600
3/17/2014
OkWO
3/18/2014
0k953
4/7/2014
0A070
4/14/2014
0,1290
4/17/2014
01500
4119/2014
0,2560
4/21/2014
0.1260
<2.5
<5O
<5.0
<&O
<5.0
<&()
<5.0
<10
<2,0
4k00
4/28/2014
01150
5/7/2014
0.0216
<2S
<2.0
<5.0
<S.O
<5.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<1.0
5/15/2014
0A280
5/16/2014
0k230
5/22/2014
0k750
6/3/2014
0J390
<2.5
<2.0
<5k
<5k
<5.0
<5.0
<2k
<2,0
<10
6/12/2014
0.1050
6/19/2014
0k760
7/22/2014
0k98S
3300
<2k
<&O
<5,0
<&O
<&O
<10
<10
6A00
8/1/2014
0.6090
8/19/2014
0k820
<2.5
<2.0
<5k
<&O
<5,0
<5;0
<2,O
<2k
<1.0
8/29/2014
0k600
9/4/2014
0,0600
9/15/2014
0.5540
9/17/2014
01060
9/24/2014
0.9300
<2S
<2,0
<5.0
<&O
<5,0
<5.0
<2k
<2.0
<k
Daily Maximum
0.930
5,000
< 5 0
< 5,0
<10.0
< &0
< 5.0
< sk
< &0
< 5.0
18.600
Average
0.154
1525
< 50
< 5,0
<5k
< 5.0
< &0
< 50
< 5.0
< &0
5.962

TABLE
MAGELLAN TERMINAL HOLDINGS, L.P.
CHARLOTTE II TERMINAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTHCAROLINA
PETROLEUM CONTACT WATER ANALYTICAL ICAL RESULTS
:"rim i+-4'3'
0141F.11111}„
(
€.
Y
5._�'
L t �'
#
AST Water
11/2/2006 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND
100 _
ug/1
AST Water i
11/2/2006 ' 1,1,2,2-Tetracloroethane
ND
80
r .
ug/l ._.
'AST Water
11/2/2006 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
100
u8/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
100
a /l
,AST Water
11/2/2006 1,1-Dlchloroethene
ND
100
u /l
AST Water
11/2/2006 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (VOA)
ND
100
u /I
AST Water
11/2/2006 ' 1,2-Dihloro+ethane
ND
100
ug1
AST Water
11/2/2006 1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
100
u /I
AST Water
11/2/2006 1,-Dichlorobenzene (VOA)
ND
100
ug/i.
AST Water
11/2/2006 ' 1,4-Dichloroberizene (VOA)
ND
100
ug/l
AST Water
11/2/2006' 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Soo
Soo
ug/l
AST Water
11/2/2006 ;Benzene
590
100
ug/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 s Bromodichloromethane
ND
100
u /l
AST Water
11/2/2006' ; Bromoform
ND
100
u /l
AST Water
11/2/2006 Bromomethane
ND
200
u/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 Carbon tetrachloride
ND
100
u/l
AST Water
11/2/2006 Chlorobenz ne
ND
100
ug/l
AST Water
11/2/2006 Chloroethane
ND
200
ug/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 Chloroform
ND
100
ug/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 Chloromethane
ND
200
ug/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
100
ug/l
AST Water
11/2/2006 cis-1,-Dichloropropene
ND
60
ug/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 ;Dibromochloromethane
ND
80
ug/I
'AST Water
11/2/2006 Dichlorodifluoromethane
100
100
u/I
'AST Water
11/2/2006 Ethylbenzene
447
100
ug/l
'AST Water
11/2/2006 Isopropyl ether
ND
100
a /l
AST Water
11/2/2006 Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,470
100
a /l
AST Water
11/2/2006 Methylene chloride
ND
200
ug/l
,AST Water
11/2/2006 Tetrachloroethene
ND
100
ug/l
:AST Water
11/2/2006 Toluene
10,900
100
a/1
.AST Water
11/2/2006 .trans-1,2-Diehloroethene
ND
100
ug/l
AST Water
11/2/2006 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
60
ug/I
T Water
11/2/2006 :Trichloroethene
ND
100
ug/I
AST Water
11/2/2006 Jrichlorofluoromethane
RID
100
a /I
AST Water
11/2/2006 Vinyl chloride
ND
100
u/l
AST Water
11/2/2006 Xylenes (Total)
2,920
200
u/I
Notes:
ND = Not detected at or above detection limit
SATeClYWagegan charlotte 11\EngilleeANPDES perPfNllNMES Permit renewaPAST Water AnatyiiC l OF I
At�r �i Ea 4� S.�'��.ri�
iii 4S g INC.
1013012014, T0$ P

Well
Date
Benzene
(ng/1)
Ethyl -benzene
(n)
DW-01
218119%
<
<
DW-01
6126/2014
< 1.0
< ' 1'0
MW-02
6/24/2014
2,600
840
tvVJ 06
612312014
13
< 1.0
.08
6723/2014
< 25
< _ 25
-13R
6/23/2014
< 1.0
< 1.0
W-1
6/2412014
< 10
:c 10
OW-4
6/26/2014
3,100
< '2,000
M
W-6
/26/2014
< 1.0
< 1.0
O -07AR
1 6/24/2014
2,500
1,600
OW-09
6/24/2014
9,600
990
6W-10
6f2412014
16;000
< 5,000
6W-11R
6/24/2014
7,800
1,400
6W- 22
6/24/2014
1,400
1,000
Cf -14
6J24/2014 m
z,600
< 2,s00
�w
C? -15
6124/2014
4 s00
2,100
�<
OW-16
6/2412014
< 5,000
5,000
OW-18
6/24/2014
< 1.0
< 10
OW-19
6/24/2014
3:2
2.3
6W-22
i/l/2014
2.4
- < v 1
E-23
612612014
< 25
< 25
bW-33
6124/2014
< 1.0
< 1.0
6 -35
6/2312014
< 1:0
<� 1.0
O -37
6/23/2014
1,300
< 20
OW-45
6/24r2U14
<5.0
< 5.0
C} 48R
6/2312014 v
< 1.0
< 1.0
6/23/2014
1.0
< 1.0
6-50R
6/23J2014
< 10
< 1.0
6W-51
6/25/2014
10
< 10
O-53�
__
6/2612014
1;200
21
OW--54
6/2612014
1.6
< _ 1.0
O -55
6123/2014
< 10
< 10
i?-56
6123/2014
{ z0
20
6-57
6/23/2014
10
< 10
OW-58
6l2312014
< 1.0
< 1.0
O-59
612512014
1.0
< 1.0
OW-60
6/25/2014
< _ 1.0
OW 61
612612044
1,000
< 10
6W-62
6/26/2014
- 11
1.0
OW-6
6126/2014
W < 1 0
< 1.0
W-02
6/26/2014
520
220
W-04
6/26J2014
< 1.0
1.0
SW-1
6l25/2014
e Lo
_
< 1.0
SW-2
6/25/2014
< LO
Notes:
ugfl = micrograms per liter
mg/i - milligrams per liter
"<" indicates that constituent was not detected above
-- = sample not analyzed for this constituent

Allocco, Marcia
From: Hall, Erin R. <Erin.Hall �aC�. mecklenburgcou;ntync.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 8c50 AM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Cc: Caldwell, David
Subject: Spill at Magellan Terminals
Good morning Marcia,
I just wanted to let you know that I responded to a 50-gallon diesel spill at Magellan Terminals located at
7924 Mt. Holly Rd. yesterday. Facility personnel contacted our office to inform us of the spill. The spill occurred while
conducting a fuel offload from a rail car. Approximately 25 gallons was spilled within a containment area that drains to
an oil/water separator and the other 25 gallons was within a gravel area between two railroad tracks (rail car offload
area). S ME was collecting soil samples yesterday to get analyzed.
unoff impacts if it rains.
if you; have any questions.
vironmental, Specialist
�cklenburg Storm Water Services
r Quality
-yon Street
'22
-4870
-4391
ecklenburecounwnc.eov
gn Consider the environment before printing this email or the attachment.

X-OWA
A747ta
A== .
HCbAm"� ENR
FF North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resou es1LE11
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Chades Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 5, 2012
Mr. Chris M, Nelson, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
Post Office Box 22186, MID 27-3
Tulsa, OK 74121-2186
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Charlotte It Terminal
NPIDES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Nelson -
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted
at the subject facility on October 4, 2011 by Mrs. Olivia Edwards of the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program (MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working
agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality.
1699.
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc, Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] k Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org
An Eqaal Oppoqunity , Affirarative Action Employer - 30% Recycled!10% Post Consumer paper

NC( 00518 11/10/04 C
C2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Clays Facility Self -Monitoring Rating E31 QA
Reserved ;
0.5 4 N
\ i
Name and Location of Facility Inspected: Entry Timei'Date:
Permit Effective:
Magellan Terminals Moldings, L.P. >QCI a.m: 6 lctober 4, 2Ct11 January 1, 2011
Charlotte 11 Terminal
7924 Mount Holly Road
pires:
Mecklenburg County, NC 3:45 a.rn I October 4, 2011 June 36, 3015
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives/Title/Phone umber:
Mr. Kyle Murray 1 Terminal Operator I Phone: [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Mr. Mark Bowen Title. area Supervisor
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
P.0 . Box 71 Phone Number:
(94) 399-6 31
Paw Creek, North Carolina 26130
Contacted: No
x
,ILL
,.�
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance
C} SSO (Sewer Overflow)
Records/Reports - Self -Monitoring Program [I Sludge Handling Disposal
[3 Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review El 'Compliance Schedules El Pretreatment Program
(l Multimedia
Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory tormwater
0 Other
See Attached Summary
Signatures} of Inspector(s); Agency/Office/Telephone:
� Gate:
Olivia J. Edwards MCWQ'PI(704) 3 -4761
October 4, 2011
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office:
Gate
3
.a ENR -- Division of Water Quality
�Marcra
Allocco Surface Water Protection — Mooresville R lonel Office_
_ April 672012
EPA Form 3 0-3 (}rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete

F
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on August 30, 2010, b
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP).
PERMIT:
The current NPDES permit became effective on JanL
Ors. Olivia Edwards of the Mecklenburg
1, 2011, and expires on June 30, 2015. The
treatment works tor Outtall ow consists of two wiwater separators, L)ne separator treats runOTT TrOM
the covered truck loading rack area and one treats runoff from the railroad loading area.
The certification classification for NCO005185 requires that the facility have an operator in responsible
charge (ORC) with a Grade I Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System (PC-1) certification.
The facility is staffed (RC and back-up) with personnel that possess the appropriate operator
certification.
RECORDSIREPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period July 2010 through June 2011,
These reports appeared to be properly completed. Facility personnel maintain clear and organized
records and reports. Copies of effluent analytical results, discharge logs, and flow measurements are
readily available at the site.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline, diesel, and ethanol fuel storage and distribution. Discharges from
both oil/water separators flow into containment basins surrounding the aboveground storage tanks.
Water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released. All of the major components of
Outfall 006 treatment works were in service and appeared to be operating properly at the time of
inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing flow meter. The flow
meter was calibrated in February 2011
LABORATORY:
The permittee contracts with Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (NC Laboratory Certification # 12) to
perform all analyses specified in the permit, Pace Analytical Services, Inc. was not evaluated under
this inspection.
EFFLUENTIRECEIVING WATERS:
Outfall 006 discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is Class WS-IV water within the
Catawba River Basin, Ouffall 006 was not discharging at the time of the inspection.

ewed for the period J

41C OOC? -:�7
Pot" MAGELLAN
MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.
W At �TY
DIVISION OFYVI
March 8, 2011 M 9 21
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
IAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Section
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby delegate authority to the Environmental Specialist, Environmental Supervisor,
Environmental Manager and Director of EHS&S to be the duly authorized representative
of Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. for the purpose of environmental compliance
reporting and related environmental issues at the petroleum terminals owned and
operated by Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. at-
7145 Old Mt. Holly Rd., Charlotte, NC
11 5-S Chimney Rock Rd., Greensboro, NC
7109 W. Market St., Greensboro, NC
4414 Buffalo Road, Selma, NC
This delegation shall be effective from March 8, 2011 and shall continue until notified
otherwise.
A
nd'tkakku A.
Melanie A. Little
Vice President Operations
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
MAY 1$ 2011
DENR4V,A'rER QUAL17i Y
POINT SOURCE AMaICH
ONE WILLIAMS CENTER, PO BOX 22186, TULSA, OK 74121-2186
[phone]

FF
tI; ATI
CLT,3
FILE,-'�'
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality;
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 11, 2010
Mr. Paul Potts, Environmental Supervisor`- South
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
One Williams Center, MID 27-
Tulsa, 7K 74172
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Charlotte 11 Terminal
NPIDES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Potts:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted
at the subject facility on August 30, 2010, by Mrs: Olivia Edwards of the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program (MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working'
agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality,
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or any other matters please do not hesitate to call Ms. Alloco or me at 704/663-
16.
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure'
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Mooresville Regional Office We
tocatio' 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 NorthCafolina
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
_ ____. __...d _.._t...a__ /1y

United States Environmental Protection Agency; Form Approved
Washington, DC 20460 (FMB No, 2040-0057
.. • _r_ _ _ ff_m_ _ :_ r _ _. A'noroval Exotres 8/31/98
Cade NPL ES Yr/Mo/Day Inspection Type Inspector
5 NCO005185 10/0 / 0 C C
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
'York Clays Facility Self -Monitoring Rating B1 QA Re
t 4 N 1
of Facility inspected:
, Holdings, L.P
it
;oad
y, N
curry # lril iudtu' r
&30 a.m. / August 30, 2010
l August 30, 2010 June 30, 2C
k#
r. Mark Bowen / Area Supervisor / Phone: [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title: Area Supervisor
Mr. Mark Bowen
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P,
P.O Box 71.. Phone Number: [phone]
Paw Greek, North Carolina 28130
Contacted: Yes
Section C: ,Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Z Permit Z Flow Measurement Z Operations & Maintenance [ ] SSO (Sewer Overflow)
* RecordslReports Z; Self -Monitoring Program [I Sludge Handling Disposal 0 Pollution Prevention
* Facility Site Review Q Compliance Schedules D Pretreatment Program (l Multimedia
* Effluent/Receiving Waters Z, Laboratory Storrnwater Ej Other
Section Cis Summary of Findlrzgs/ o rnent
See Attached Summary
1
Signatures} of Inspector(s): Agency/Off icefTelephone: bate:
Olivia J. Edwards MCWQP/(70) 6- 761 September 1, 2010
Signature o Rev" wrer: Agency/Office: _ Date:
CC
— Division' of Water Quality
Marcia; Allocco Surface Water Protection —Mooresville Re ional Office- October 8, 2010 w�
EPA Form 3560- (Rev 9-4) Previous editions are obsolete

F
Mr. Paul Potts, Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
NCO005185 CEI, Page 3
October 11, 2010
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on August 28, 2009, by Mrs, Olivia Edwards of the Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP).
PERMIT:
The current NPDES permit became effective on June 1, 2006, and expired on June 30, 2010, A
permit renewal application was received by the Division of Water Quality on December 29, 2009,
The new permit is currently under review by the Division, Until the new permit is issued the facility
should continue to operate under the requirements of the expired permit.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline, diesel, and ethanol fuel storage and distribution, Dist
Outfall 006 treatment works were in service and appeared to be operating properly at the tim
inspection,
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing flow meter.'
meter was calibrated in February 2010,
LABORATORY:
The permittee contracts with Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (NC Laboratory Certification # 12
perform all analyses specified in the permit, Pace Analytical Services, Inc. was (lot evaluate(
this inspection,
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
Clutfall 006 discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is Class WS-IV water
Catawba River Basin, Outfall 006 was discharging at the time of the inspection.

SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
DMRs and analytical reports were reviewed for the period July 2000 thi
indicate that the facility was in compliance with permit monitoring requi
during this review period, except for the following:
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE.
The facility and site appeared to be well operated and maintained.
006 remains locked and must be manually opened for discharge to
discharge valve for Outfall
zr.

IVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Envision of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coieen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 31, 2010
r. Paul Potts, Environmental Supervisor — South
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
One Williams Center, MD 27-3
Tulsa, OK 74172
Subject: Notice of Violation — Ef ent Limitations
Tracking #: NOV-2410 ,092
Magellan Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO0051 5
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Potts:
A review of the December 2009 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter at Outfall 006.
Date Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
12/14/09 Phenol 110 ug/I 60 u 'I (daily maximum)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The Division
of Water Quality may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the violations are of
a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may wish to considerapplying for a Special Order by Consent. You may
contact Ms. Marcia Allocco of this Office for additional information.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Allocco or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Point Source Brandt
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Protection
1L
Mooresville Regional Office
Location, 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 TOne
Phone: [phone] \ Pax l�l [phone]I Customer Service: 1-877-623-674& thCa 'olina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org VA717AM711y
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer— 30% Recycled110% Rost Consumer paper

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 22, 2010
Mr, Chris Nelson
Environmental Specialist
Magellan Terminal Holdings,, P.P. Charlotte 11
7924 Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte North Carolina 28214
Subject: Notice of Violation — Ef pent Limitations
Tracking#: NOA ��%92
Magellan Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Nelson:
A review of the December 2009 self monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter at Outtall 006:
Date Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
12/14/09 Phenol 110 ug/I 60 ug/I (daily maximum)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any problems. The, Division
AA' nrp I -if
{fit Water Quainy may pursue G111iJ14wG111Lt14 aVUW— — -- -- —.1
a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying fora Special Order by Consent. You may
contact Ms. Marcia Allocco of this Of for additional informatiom
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Allocco, or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
X
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
C, Point Source Branch
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Protection
L
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East CenterAve., Suite 301 mooresville, NC 28115 One,
Phone: [phone] \ Fax, [phone] \ customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCaroliiia
Internet: www,ncwaterqualitpirg Nattarall'y
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 30% Peryded/l 0% Post Consumer Paper

Norm uarollna uopartmont of tnviron
Division of Water
es Perdue Doleen H. Sullins
Director
Septembe
Paul Potts, Environmental ;Supervisor South
;ellan Midstream. Partners, LP
Williams Center, MD 27-
;a OK 74 172
SUBJECT: Complian
Charlotte
NPDES
Mecklenl
r Mr. Potts:
t
nt and Natural Resources
ality
Dee Freeman
Secretary
I , 20 9
County, North Carolina
at the subject facility on August 28, 2009, by Mrs. Olivia Edwards of the Mecklenburg Col
Quality Program (MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative work
agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any clues
concerning this report or any other matters please do not hesitate to call Ms.,' Allocco or me
1.'
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave,, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 2 115 1
Phone: [phone] Fax. [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 1
ifn#awxnh eA.naa rnxr�4cmi�tihi rim ;:. .. ': 3

I
TransactionCode NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector
Facility Type
N 5 NCO005185 09/08/28 C C
2
Remarks:
Inspector- Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA '.....Reserved.........,..
0.4 4 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
Entry Time: 9:00 am
Permit Effective Date:
June I, 2006
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
Exit Time: 9:30 am
Charlotte II Terminal
Permit Expiration Date:
7924 Mount Holly Road
Date: August 28, 2009 '
June 30, 2010
Mecklenburg County, NC
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------- Title(s)-------- Phone No(s):
r. Mark Bowen / Area Supervisor / Phone: [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Mr. Mark Bowen
Title: Area Supervisor
I
Magellan. Terminals Holdings, L.P
Phone No.
?
Contacted.
P.O, Box 71
[phone]
Yes
Paw Creek, North Carolina 28130
Section C.' Areas Evaluated During Inspection
21 Permit Z Flaw Measurement Z Operations & Maintenance
[ Sewer Overflow
Z Records/Reports Z Self -Monitoring Program E[ Sludge Handling/Disposal
Pollution Prevention
Z Facility Site Review F-1 Compliance Schedules 0 Pretreatment Program
If
❑ Multimedia
Z Effluent/Receiving Waters Z Laboratory El Strrmwater
Q Other:
Section. D: Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
Olivia J. Edwards
MCWQP/[phone]
September 9, 2009
Signature of Reviewer.
x
Agency/Office:
Date:
'f II �
NCDENR— Division of Water Quality
Marcia Allocco
Surface rater Protection — Mooresville Regional Office
September 15, 2009
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised -85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENEkXL:
The facility was last inspected on August 28
County Water Quality Program (MCWQP).
PEkNIIT:
The current NPDES permit became effectiv(
The permit properly describes the facility and appe�
The treatment works for Outfall 006 consists of two
from the covered truck loading rack area and one tr(
The certification classification for NCO0051
responsible charge (ORC) urith a Grade I Physical I
)8, by Ms. Erin Hall of the Mecklenburg
June 1, 2006, and expires on June 3 )0, 2010.
this renders his certification invalid. Prior to the issuance of the inspecti
Ions renewal fees were paid for Mr. Harris' certification on September 9
[on is once again valid.
areTeadil available at the site.
;ITE REVIEW:
'-loading have been constructed at the facility since the pi
storage tanks, Water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released. All of the r
components of Outfall 006 treatment works were in service and appeared to be operating prop(
the time of inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing flow 1
The facility's flow meter was replaced with a new one in October 2008.
LABORATORY:
The permittee contracts with Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (NC Laboratory Certificati(
to perform all analyses specified in the permit. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. was not evaluate
this inspection.

)utfall 006 was disc
ALM:
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANLTCE:
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintai

A J Michael F, Easley, Gave o
William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary
CIO 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and :natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
September 18, 2008
r. Paul Potts, Sr.
Magellan Midstream Partners, I.P.
One Williams Center, MD 7-
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Charlotte II Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO0051 5
Mecklenburg County, North. Carolina
Dear Mr.. Potts:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on August 28, 2008, by Ms. Erin Hall of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program MCWQP). This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between
Mecklenburg County and the Division. of Water Quality.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or any ether matters please do not hesitate to call Ms. Allocco or me at 704163-
16 .
Sincerely,
for Robert E. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
ATA ��nc Carolina
DENR t 711!1
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water (duality Phone [phone] Customer Service
lntemet ww .ncwater ual r Werrg 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recyclen110%Post Consumer Paper

North Carolina Dt
Division of'
Transaction Code
NPDES I
Inspection Work Days
Facility
0.4
�Irotection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
mce Inspection Report
of Envirom-nent and Natural Resources
08/08/28
f-Monitoring Evaluation Rating
'

F
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on November 9, 2007, by Ms. Erin Hall of the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP).
PERMIT:
The current NPDES permit became effective on June 1, 2006 and expires on June 30,
2010. The permit properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the waste stream being
treated. The treatment works for Outfall 006 consists of two oil/water separators. One separator
treats runoff from the covered truck loading rack area and one treats runoff from the railroad
loading area.
The certification classification for NCO005185 requires that the facility have an operator
in responsible charge (ORC) with a Grade 1 Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
(PC-1) certification. The facility is staffed (ORC and back-up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification,
�ORDS/REPORTS.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period June 2007 through
2008. These reports appeared to be properly completed. Facility personnel maintain clear,
mized records and reports. Copies of effluent analytical results, discharge logs, and flow
,suremerns are readily available at the site.
rE REVIEW.-
ly released.
to be operating properly at the time of inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall, 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing floNA
meter. The facility's flow meter was replaced with a new one in January 2008.
LABORATORY:
The permittee contracts with Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (NC Laboratory Certificat
12) to perform all analyses specified in the pertnit. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. was not
evaluated under this inspection.

/RECEIVING WATERS.
11006 discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is Class WS-1V
the Catawba River Basin. Outfall 006 was discharging at the time of the inspection.
ITORING PROGRAM:
.s were reviewed for the period June 2007 through May 2008. The reports indicate
ty was in compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements during this
1NS & MAINTENANCE:

Michael F. Easley, Go
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
-'
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H, Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
November 21, 2007
r. Paul Potts, Sr.
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
One Williams Center, MD 7-3
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
Charlotte II Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Potts.
attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco at the letterhead address. Additionally, please send a copy of this
response to Mr. Rusty Ro zelle ofMCWQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or any ether matters please do not hesitate to call Ms. Allocco or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Rusty Rozze le, MCWQP
O
iDne
r►Carolina
NCQENR talc
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Secs
Internet. t N is nci Zller(u if rsN t} 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone] 3-67j
An Equal OpportunitytAffirmative;fictton Employer - 50% Recycledf90% Past Consumer Paper

ited States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Torth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resourc,
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
lit i
rr
U.
Title:
Contacted?
FAS
Erin Ral 11
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

type and grade for the system as per 15A NCAC 8G.0201 (Responsibilities of System Owners)
and the standard conditions of NCO005185.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period June 2006 through
May 2007. These reports appeared to be properly completed.
Facility personnel maintain clear, organized records and reports. Copies of effluent
analytical results, discharge logs, and flow measurements are readily available at the site.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution. Discharges
from both oil/water separators flow into containment basins surrounding the aboveground storage
tanks. Water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released.
All of the major components of Outtall 006 treatment works were in service and appeared

to be operating properly at the time of inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
:Plow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing flow
meter. According to Part 1I, Section D ofNPDES permit NC00015, it states in part that, "flow
measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated at a minimum of once per year". The flow
meter for this facility has not been calibrated on an annual basis. To be in compliance with
permit terms, the flow meter must be calibrated as soon as possible.
LABORATORY:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. is certified by the Division ofWater Quality to perform all
chemical analyses (NC Laboratory Certification #12) specified in the permit. Pace Analytical
Services, Inc. was not evaluated under this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS.
Outfall 00E discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is a Class S-IV
water within the Catawba River Basin. Outfall 006 was not discharging at the time of the
inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
D Rs were reviewed for the period June 200E through May 2007 The reports indicate
that the facility was in compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements during this
period.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained.

pppp"
MAGr=LLAN, RECEIVED
MIDSTREAM PARTNERS„ L..P,
DEC 14 2007
December 12, 2007
Via Fed Er
Ms. Marcia Allocco M-Surface Water Protection
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
10 East Center .Ave, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 2811
704-663-1699
Re: NCDENR, 11/ 1/07 Notice of Deficiency Letter
Magellan's Charlotte 1I Terminal, NPDES Permit #NCO005185
Resolution of Issues
Dear Ms. Allocco
There were two issues identified in the above referenced notice of deficiency letter. This was from a
November 9, 2007 compliance evaluation inspection at our Charlotte 11 terminal. The first was that the
certification renewal fees for the back-up operator responsible in charge (C RC) — Michael Harris had not
been paid. This has been resolved with the payment of $220 on December 10, 2007 to Water Pollution
Control System Operators Certification Commission sent by D11L carrier service. See attached invoice,
copy of check and shipping certificate.
esecond issue was that flow meter used for discharge flow measurement had not been calibrated at
least annually. The flow meter was calibrated on December 10, 2007 and found to be within the permit
deviation/error percent. Attached is a copy of the calibration certificate.
,Please contact me if you need any additional information. Thank you for your compliance assistance with
this program,
Sincerely;
Paul Potts
Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners
One Williams Center, MD27-3
Tulsa., OK 74121
918) 574-772
cc
Mr. Rusty Rozzelle
Mecklenburg Coutny Water Quality
700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205
Charlotte, NC 28202
Mark Bowen, Charlotte 11 Terminal
ONE WILLIAMS CENTER, PO BOX 22186 TULSA, OR 74121-2185
[phone]

k -T VIP
2 0 0 7 R E- a 0 9 3 9 6
md rrA ftCOMC6nf=VW'O"'A 'be Spx't
Ram pbont: 704-SO"165
work rboo= 704-399-9467
Col"tr. *"I+*- L-Atto)n
antinuing Education Hours, Please
F�t
G ! CC
VVPCSGCC
,I)Wbion of WAttr QuslitY
q -:Q-tv'r
I ox mall servia Czater
'. R tjg�,b, �v �'0161 sle*r
F h,=N�C27699�4618
plewe visit mW WeUsitc. WW
f,=. Cr �njfjej OPVMUW 6su..V.A mom
2 926266cltro,� UL-ITozew L'O

qjolri-7
NCDL- 1
2173 BEni HANW4R ROAD
DENVER, NC 28037
K«r roG or to rt i` 5
nu
4rnrV)d0TId—e4iA7
cja
�r
ACH WT tl5 eWi 96
ilaOS30001961*0 000693593074EIIIICD�-3
Sender Account dumber Prepeirrt F'urrtiat No, Payment 009in
CLT 605680960'46
-� =J FROM (Company) Service
R eat 3"i Paty Type
xio StrsetOARTNERS L P p� Pall In w9 a rrarez ra
7944 MT HOLLY t�tAcn and
Cfiry.... State Z'tP CODE (Required) Sr;Nn9 Reference (tin � t on invoice)
Sent by (Nam 7 Phone (Required)
- 'tot Px
a
e.
c i {Co ny) - Special tnstrusUoos
> d 081 3aturdey I'li
.� p i,. G '� rrt �" s � eW"e' C�tttt � Hold at ilMt oic6
No a to eti s they
Stretet'Asfdresa mra
Lab Pack SerA des' ton,
CC , writ .dhi-usa.co n
p City Ststa IP CODE (Requ ) Shipment Valuation filar 06 k
« area rr srs� a u vault
t _ N` �t^r ' value „ EOUCKM
c au tlh
all Aiierrtiun; (N ept)� n Phone (sequired) artn
s tcrt xean
yy ccx v' srt� ew
CL W ? G5 / •y 2 Q •^x Payment Qe (Greetlt Card] r c wa
"` €lcsciptien t ,J i7w No.
kit L Senders ate 014L Signature Crate T} Eatpires OKL WorldwFda Exp ass. tnc.
LU 1200 Sou h i'trre island Road,
�! Plantation FL 3=4
to
° 9262GGEtIOG U :T Ta 2ew CI92 «2 1.0 2T Ueda;

Michael F Easley, Governor
' Williant G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
i
C "C Alan W. Klitnels, l'. L .Director
Division of Water Quality
July 6, 2006
0ZALRBSO OE
Paul Potts, Environmental Specialist
Magellan Terminal' Holdings, L.P.
7924 Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC 28214 JUL 7 70r'
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report NCO005185
Dear Permittee: u t j y
WATER,,
ITY SECTION
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
into the Division's database, Our data entry staff has informed me of problems with your recent DMR
submittal. Until these problems have been corrected, your DMR will be considered incomplete. Please
see the attached form along with a copy of the problem: DMR for details regarding the 1:7MR's deficiency.
Incomplete or illegible DMRs affect our staff s ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation of DMR
submittals, please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with ;your NPDES permit and 15A NC"AC 02B .0506, and you may be subject to further
enforcement action. Please take the necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
Attention: Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs, please contact Michele Phillips at 919-733-5083 Ext. 534. Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Michele Phillips
cc:
Central Files
S" t INhCarolina
,r!lXcl`
N. C. Division ofWater (duality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Phone: [phone] Custretter Service
Internet: httpl/h2o.ennstate.ne.us 512 N. Salisbury St: Raleigh. NC 2760 Fax: [phone]-623-674
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

FF7
l t� ce of ple a ge Mo `tca ` Report
.Permit Numbeer.
I"
DMR Tenth and Yean Mali- "
e Division of Water Quahty deem 'the aforementioned DMR as incomplete due to the
following reason(s): a see the highlighted areas can the attached DMR for details.)
e written values are illegible.
LI The Average, Maximum, and/or the Minimum data paints have been omitted.
The Emits of Messura have been omitted or imorr ' t.
LI The DMR Parameter Codes have been omitted.
ti
�j
s ►

maim
I I I
won
ma,
smommm NO
Imm
MR M,
14M
w
c

Facility; Status.(Please check one of the following)
monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
iitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
ioncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being talon in respect to equipment, operation,
c., and a time table for improvements to be made.
penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
,cordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
nd complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
xsibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Paul Potts, Environmental Specialist
Per ` ee ea p or type)
Signatur f Perm tee*" pate
oad. Charlotte. NC 2 214 7nA.'igg_Ai,%1 r nf�snnr`
Permittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
PARAMETER CODES;

Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report
Permit Number: Nub C51
Facility. Gt t ittl"t
k
County:
�-
DMR Month anti Year:
The Division of rater Quality deems the aforementioned ]AMR as incomplete due to the
following reason(s): (Please seethe highlighted areas on the attached D,t.'R for
details.)
Ll The written valuesare illegible.
The Average, Maximum,and/or the Minimum data points have been omitted.
Ll The Units of Measure have been omitted or are incorrect.
Ll The DMR Parameter Codes have been omitted.
Other:
M S�"LLC"P")
PIAt"` `" l 3 0
/ - Org
E i! f
w

a�0� wAr �Qc�
Michael F. Easley, Governor
p William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
( Alan W. kirr P. E. � `
Di
.Date February 6, 2006
Paul Potts
Magellan 'Terminal Holdings, LP FEB C 7 0 G"
7924 ML Holly Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28214
Subject: Notice of incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report NCO005185
v
:Dear Permittee:
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (D ) from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
into the Division's database. Our data entry staff has informed me of problems with your recent DMR
submittal. Until these problems have been corrected, your DMR will be considered incomplete. Please
see the attached farm along with a copy of the problem. DMR for details regarding the DMR's deficiency.
Incomplete or illegible DMRs affect our staffs ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation DMR
submittals. Please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with your NPDES permit and 15A NCAC 02B .0506, and you may be subject to further
enforcement action. Please take the necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
Attention; Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central files
1617 Mail Service Center `
Raleigh, North Carolina 7699-1617 '
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs,;please contact Michele Phillips at 19-733-5083 Ext. 534. Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Michele Phillips
cc:
Central Files
xatu-2m
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Phone. [phone] Customer Service
Intemet: httpJlh2o enr state.nc,us 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax: [phone]
An Equip tip itylAlBmtative Action Employ

VWq A T` Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr.„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
81 r
Coleen H. Sullins, Chairman
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
.'
tr j„
CERTIFIED lliit
A
ax
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
{1
September 9, 2005
Mr. Paul Potts
Magellan Terminals Holdings LP
PO Box 22186 Mo ?-
Tulsa Old 4121-2166
Subject: Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) and Backup Operator Designation Information
Permit Number: NCO074705 (Charlotte 1 Terminal) and NCO005185 (Charlotte 11 Terminal)
Dear Mr. Potts: ;
During routine review of your issued Wastewater permits (NCO04705 & NCO0051€35), it was
discovered that you have net designated an ORC and the Back -Up ORC who holds a valid
Grade 1 (or higher) Physical Chemical Certification for your system. Your system was classified
by the Water Pollution Control System Operator Certification Commission (WPCSOC ) August
17, 2001
Upon classification of a facility by the WPCSOCC, it is the responsibility of the system owner to
designate an ORC and Back -Up ORC as set forth in T15 : 08G .0201 and .0202 (a) and (b).
Please review the above -mentioned rule located in the enclosed copy of the WPCSC CC
operator rules and take necessary steps to correct this accordingly. If you have designated an
ORC and a Back -Up ORC with the correct certification then our database is in error. Please
use the enclosed Operator Designation Form and submit the correct information so we can
update our system,
Sincerely,
James Pugh
Education and Training Specialist
Technical Assistance and Certification
19-7 3-0026/ext 41
Enclosure
Cc:
TAC Files
Mr. Michael Harris
2 Enclosures
AR
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit Internet http:Hh2o.enr.nc,state.us/tac
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1618 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycledt10% post -consumer paper

e
PPV
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
v ion of Water Ouslity
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P ., Director
September 6, 200
. Paul Potts, Sr.
Magellan, L.P.
One Williams Center, MD 27-
P.O. Box 3102
Oklahoma 4172
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Magellan`i Hold' L.P.
Charlotte II Terminal
D S Permit No. NCO00 18
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Potts:
On August 30, 2005, Mr. David J. Rimelr of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Pro (C C P) conducted an inspection at the subject facility This inspection was
conducted as part of cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
DridsionofWa-Quality " `clo report should be self-explanatory
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to Call Mr Ric ° g ',:. or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
DRG dj
File "ir O: NOD005185.0805
Mooresville .W Office
610 East CenterAvenue, Su#e 301, Mooresvilk North Carolina 2811
Phone: [phone] Fat 7 6 04 t Internet: h o.enr.stete, .us dot�hCarohna
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% yoied/101% Post Consumer Paper AINA911Y

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected an December 23, 2004 by the Mecklenburg County Water
4ualfty Program CvICWQP . A Compliance Evaluation Inspection report was issued can January
t 1, 0,
. m �. • i r� w e m s
M.
to be operating propaly at the time of the inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfidl 006 is accomplishedcontinuous/totalizing :law
ter.

LABORATORY:
Pace Analytical performs analysisof ef Ruent samples. Pace Analyticalis certified by the
State of North Carolina to per.form, analysis on all parameters specified in the perinit. Pace
Analytical t evaluated under.; n
EFFLUENURECEDVING WA
Outfidl tip discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is C 1V
withinthe Catawba River Basin. 006 was not discharging at the tune ofthe
inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM.-
DMRs
were reviewed for the period August 2004 through July 2005. The reports
indicate that the facility was in compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirementsdurmg}
this period.
OPERATIONS +& MAINTENANCE:
The facity and'site appeared weff operated and maintained.

Northr t 4
NCDENR
arolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-
Division of Water Quality
icha l F. Easley, Governor; William C. Ross, Jr,, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, RE., Director
January 11, 2005
:Paul Potts, Sr., Environmental Specialist
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
One Williams Center, MD 27-
P.O.Box 3102
Tulsa, Oklahoma 7417
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
(Formerly Williams Terminals Holdings, L.P.)
Charlotte 11 Terminal
l' PDES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Potts
On December 23, 2004, Mr.`David J. Rimer of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Pro (MC WC P) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was
conducted as part of cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Envision of WaterQuality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If cru have any questions concerning this report or any ether matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridge ° n or me at this Office.
Sincerely;
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQ
URG/djr
Fite W Q: NCO005185,1204
resville Regional Office One
19 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 C)Carolina
hone. 04-663-1699 l Fax: [phone] t Internet: h o.enr,state.nc.us
n Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/Iffo Post Consumer Paper

United Mates Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
Form Approved
" NPDES Compliance Inspection Report � OMB No. 2040-000.1
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources r Approval Expires
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional OfficeN�rDENR
7/31/85
Section A: National Data SystemCoding......
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR{MO/`DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCO005185 04/12/23 C
C
Remarks:
Inspector: MecklenburRColin Water ualr Proraxn
Inspection Work mays Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
..Reserved.,; ........; .
0.8 3 N N
Section B: Facility Data
°dame and Location of Facility Inspected: Entry Time: 8:40 AM
Permit Effective Date.
Magellan Terrainals Holdings, L.P.
Charlotte H Terminal Exit Time: 10:30 AM
September 22, 2003
7924 Mount Holly Road
Permit Expiration Date.
Mecklenburg County Date:
_ December 23, 2004
June 30, 2005
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives-------Title(s)-------- Phone No(s)r
Mr. Mark Bowen/ Area Supervisor/ 704-399-6331'
Name and Address of Responsible Official: 'Title: Senior Environmental Specialist
Mr. Paul Potts, Sr.
Magellan Midstream Partners, Z.P. Phone No.
Contacted?
One Williams Center, MD 27-3 919- 73-1605
No
Tulsa, OK 74172
Section C:
; � AreasEvaluated Laurin ilu� ic'tcon
permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance
[] Sewer Overflow
Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal
[I Pollution Prevention
Z Facility Site Review Q Compliance Schedules (Q Pretreatment Program
E] Multimedia
Effluent/Receiving Waters JZ Laboratory El Storrawater
❑ Other:
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector( ): Agency/Office/Telephone: Date:
David J. Rimier MC.WQP/[phone] December 28, 2004
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office Date:
EPA Form 30-3 (Revised -85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on .tune 4, 2004 by the Mecklenburg County Water (duality
Program (:[V CWQP). ACompliance Evaluation Inspection report was issued on June 30, 2004.
PERMIT:
The current pen -nit became effective on September 22, 2003 and expires on June 30,
2005 The permittee Nvill submit the permit renewal application prior to 180 days Before the
expiration of the current permit, The permit authorizes the discharge of storm water/wastewater
from Outfall 006 and properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the waste stream
being treated.
The +treatment works for Outfall 006 consists of two oil/water separators. One separator
treats runoff from the covered truck loading rack area and one treats runoff from the railroad
loading area.
Ct Si PORTS:
Discharge (Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed: for the period December 200
through November 2004 for Outfall 006. These reports appeared to be properly completed.
Facility personnel maintain clear, organized records and reports. Copies of effluent
analytical results, discharge logs, and flow measurements are readily available at the site.
FACILITY" SITE VIEW:
The facility is engaged in gasoline and diesel fuel storage and distribution:, Discharges
from both oil/water separators flow into containment basins surrounding the above ground
storage tanks. Water is geld in the containment basins until it is manually released.
All of the major components:of Out all 006 treatment works were in service and appeased
to be operating properly' at the time of the inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing flow
meter.

TORY:
h Carolina to perform analysis can all parameters specified i
as not evaluated under this inspection
'/RECEIVING WATERS:
[ITC NCB PROGRAM:
iat the facility was in compliance with permit lirnij
Ong this period.
MAINTENANCE:
ytical is certified by the
the pennit. Pace
rich is Cl S-IV
e time of the inspection.
I appeared free of solids,
,ember 2004. The
monitoring

Michael F. Easley
> Governor
AMA N t William G. Ross, Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, I .E.„ Director
Division of Water Quality
September 9, 2004
411-2186
Subject: Renewal Notice
DES Permit NOD005185
Charlotte II Terminal
Mecklenburg County
1 civil penalties of lap to $25,000 per day.
f all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact me at the telephone
or address listed below. You mayalso contact the Mooresville Regional Office a (704) 66 -1699 to begin the re cissi(
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. 1 e checklist identifies the items you must submit wit]
aut renewal application.. If you have any questions, please contact nie at the telephone number or e-mail address listed
Sincerely,
Charles I-L Weaver, Jr.
:t:ES Unit
at ral Files'
IDES File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5983, extension 511 (fax) 919 733.0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2oenr.state.ne.us/NPDES e-mail:charles.weaver ncmail.net

N1'nE Q D .t XTfInAn 1e5
e
Chadotte II Ternrinal
Mecklenburg County
r rrr+v-, V--.. f 11 1 1
;es at the facility since
ee or an Authorized
EMNIONNNIVEM
water, ,Qerbac ash, etc.)
PLEASE NCB
Due to a change in fees; effective January 1,1999, there is no renewal fee required with your
application package.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NC DENR ./ Water (duality NPD S Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

K2
Michael F.Govemor
w% William G. Ross Jr- secretary
North Camlina Department ofEnviraument and Natural Resources
.={ Alan W. l:Jinwk. P. E, Dirwor
Divisiort of Water Quality
pr Colew H. Sullin& Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 30, 2004 ;
'aul Potts, Sr., Environmental Specialist
Midstream Partners, L.P.
Wrilliams Center, MD 27-3
Pox 310
4 Oklahoma 7417
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Magellan Terminals`Holdings, L.F.
(Formerly Williams Terminals Holdings, L.P.)
Charlotte 11 Terminal
DES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, N.G.
. Potts:
On June 4, 2004, Mr.
David J. Rimer of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
enclosed port should be self-explanatory.
hesitate to call Ric ; d Bridgeman or me at " Office.'
Sincerely,
s D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzele, MCWP
DRG/djr, ,
File WQ: NC 5i15M4
N� itC lina
:

10�1 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC 20460 o
No"MrA Form Apprved
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report OMB No. 2040-0003
71 North Carolina Depacent of Environment and Natural Resources ALA- Approval Expires
r NCDENR e Division of Water Quality. Mooresville Regional Office 7, ",
Section A: National Data System Codine
Code NPDE S Permit No. 'WMO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
5 NCO005185 04/06/04 C C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
......... Rescncd.....
3 N N
Section B: Facility Data,
ition of Facility Inspected: Entry Time: 8:50 AM
Permit Effective Date:
nals Holding gs, L.P.
ninal Exit Time: 10:20 AM
S-eptember 22, 2003
Ily Road
Permit Expiration Date:
aunty Date:
June 4, 2004
30, 2005
_LTune
Site Representatives —Title(s)Phone No(s):
n/ Area Supervisor/ 704-399-6331
ress of Responsible Official:
Title: Senior —Environmental Specialist
;r.
tarn Partners, L.P.
Phone No.
Contacted?
enter, MD 27-3
919-573-1605
No
Section'C:,
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Flow Measurement Z Operations & Maintenance
El Sewer Overflow
orts Self -Monitoring Program [I Sludge Handling/Disposal
D Pollution Prevention
keview Compliance Schedules El Pretreatment Program
Multimedia
-iving Waters LaEborato -1 for titer
E
Other.
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
ted satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Inspector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
bbl��l I'm
MCWQP/[phone]
June 16, 2004
viewer: Ll/
Agency --- /Office
Date:
1 - WIN-MRIVEMMIRMUWwr M-91mmu,

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on .tune 10, 2003 by Mr. James P. Wilson, 11 of the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCW ,?P). A: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
report was issued. on July 9,:2004.`
Ply
The current permit became effective on September 22, 2003 and properly describes the
facility as well as the ownership and name changes and appears adequate for the waste stream
_. 8. v
e treatment works for Outfall 006 consists of two oil/water separators, One sep
H from the covered truck loading rack area and one treats runoff from the railrc
,a
MS/REPORTS:
IVI I• III i lll�l ��
storage tanks. Water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released.
All of the major components of Outfall 006 treatment works were in service and apl
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection:
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Plow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using 'a continuous/totalizing fl
meter.

pppppp-
LABORATORY:
Pace Analytical performs analysis of effluent samples. Pace Analytical is certified by the
State of North Carolina to perform analysis on all parameters specified in the permit. Pace
Analytical was not evaluated under this inspection
,UENTIRECEIVING WATERS:
AAC ..8 .....L...: ..,:...., a..,,. ,..,._..S t'l---I— _,1_°_1_ _•..� i"'a1__� tt af'a Ttt
peen.'
)NITORING PROGRAM:
a.-:
that the facility was in compliance with permit limits d onitoring requirements during this
period.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained.

Michac
William
North Carolina Department of Environment a
Alan W. K
Divi
or
Coleen H. So
Divi
July 9, 2003
lul Potts, Sr. Environmental Specialist
ns Terminal Holdings, L.P.
Tilliams Center, MD 36-40
Oklahoma 74172-0165
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Williams Energy Ventures, Inc.
Paw Creek Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
4r. Potts:
r. i he enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
hesitate to call Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
DRG/jpw
File WQ: NCO005185.603
APh
VC-LILNR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
-663-1699 Customer Service
-663-6040 1-877-623-6748

t
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCOOO5185 03/06/10 C C 2
Remarks:
Ins ecton Mecklenbur Coon Water uali Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI +QA ; ...........Reserved............
1.0 3 NN
:. Section B: T'acilit
Data
Entry Time: :30 pra
Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
Exit Time: 3:45 pm
Se to ber 1, 2001
Willams Terminal Holdings, L.P.
Permit Expiration Date:
Paw Creek Terminal
Date:
7924 Mount Holly Road
Tune 10, 2003
June 30, 005
Mecklenburg County
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives Titles)Phone No(s):
Mr. Mark Bowen/ Area Supervisor/ 704- 99-6331
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title: Senior Environmental Specialist
Paul Potts
Williams Terminal Holdings, L.P.
Phone No. Contacted?
e Williams Center, MD 36-40
19-58-2000 No
Tulsa, DR 74172
SiY ti-: 2r; Yk r.:l /
t"'e, Ytl S
„'§,kva , aX`a".a n i
�t y} � �
la
pti
�A 'ted �Du�.. ��.,� VEI„i'\YY. zt�'�".
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Sewer Overflow
Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program ` Q Sludge Handling/Disposal Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review ( Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program Multimedia
Effluent/Receift Waters Laboratoa Storrawater Other:
ection T1: SmumaryofFindlangs o meinis
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise
indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of In pector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
t�MCwQPJ(704)
36-5500
June 18, 2003
Tames P. Wils n,11
Signature of Reviewer:
Agency/Office
Date:
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on March 8, 2002 by Mr. Derrick A. Harris of the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspect
report was issued on March 21, 2002.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and expires on June 30, 21
The permit authorizes the discharge of storm water/wastewater from Outfall 006.
The treatment works for tfall 006 consists aft o oil/water separators. One sepan
treats runoff from the covered truck, loading rack area and one treats runoff from the railroad
loading area.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period January 2002
through March 2003 for Out fidl 006.
Facility personnel maintain clear, organized records and reports. Copies of effluent
analytical results, discharge logs, and flow measurements are readily available at the site.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuoushotalizing flow
meter.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples froutfall 006 is performed by Prism Laboratories (NC
Laboratory Certification # 402). Prism Laboratories was not evaluated under this inspection.

EFFLUENTIRECEIVING WATERS.*
Ot alll 006 discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is a Glass -IV
water in the Catawba River Basin. Outfall 006 was discharging at the time of the inspection.
Visual inspection of the effluent revealed that the discharge was clear and appeared free of solids,
foam or sheen.
SELF -MONITORING G PROD
DMRs were reviewed for the period January 2002through March 2003. The reports
indicate that the facility was in compliance with permit limits 'and monitoring requirements during
this ;period.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
e facility and site appeared well operated and maintained.

Michael F
William G. Ross, Jr., S
3)L Department of Environment and Natural Re
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting
Division of Wate
March 21,2002)
:ire Morm, Sr. Environmental Specialist
as Terminal Holdings, L.P.
illiams Center, MD 36-40
Dklahoma 74101
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Williams Energy Ventures, Inc.
Paw Creek Terminal
NPICES Permit No. NCO005185
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
fr. Monn:
iesitate tt> call Mr. Ric*ha'rd Bridgeman or me at this Of
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
,nclosure
1c: I Rusty Rozzelle, MCDEP
)RG/dah
'file WQ NCO005185.302
rvice Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone (7D4) 663-1699
'48 Fax [phone]

, x United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460 Forrn Approved
NPI ES Compliance Inspection Report ATAOMB No. 2040-0 03
No Carolina Department of Environment d Natural Resources Approval Epires
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office NCDEN
7/31 /85
Section A: National Data System ` Coding
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. "YItJ/MO/DAY inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCO005185 01/03/08 C C
Remarks.
Inspector: Mecklenburg Cou r Environmental Protection
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation dating BI t o Reserved............
1.0 3 N N
Section Bt Facility Data
Entry Time. 8:55 am Permit Effective date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected.
Exit Time: 10:02 am September 1, 2001
Will s Terminal Holdings, L.P. Permit Expiration Bate.'
Paw Creek Terminal Date.
7924 Mount Holly Road March 8 2002 June 30, 2005
Mecklenburg County
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives --Titles)---Phone No(s).
Mr. Mark Bowen/ Area Supervisor/ 704-399-6331'
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title. Senior Environmental Specialist
Mr. Steve Mann
Williams Terminal Holdings, L.P. Phone No. Contacted`'
One Williams Center, MD 6-40
Tulsa, OK 7417 919-588- 000 No
Section C.
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Sewer Overflow
Records/Repo Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling/Disposal Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review D Compliance Schedules ( Pretreatment Program Q Multimedia
Effluent/Receiving Waters LaboEqory
Ej Stormwater Other:
Section uruuar,y of Findings/Commentsi
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Ins ector(s): Agency/Office/Telephone. Date.
Derrick A. Harris MCDEP/[phone] March 18, 2002
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office Date.
EPA Form 3560- (Revised -85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

RAIL:
--P+U-
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP). A Compliance
Evaluation Inspection report was issued on April 10, 2001.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and expires on June 30, 2005.
The permit authorizes the discharge of storm water/wastewater from Outfall 006.
The treatment works for Outfall 006 consists of two oil/water separators. One separator
area.
RDS/REPORT S:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period January through
)er 2001 for Outfall 006.
Facility personnel maintain clear, organized records and reports. Copies of effluent
;aI results, discharge logs, and flow measurements are readily available at the site.
ITY SITE REVIEW:
from both oil/water separators flow into containment basins surrounding the above ground
storage tanks. Water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released.
All of the majjor components of Outfall 006 treatment works were in service and appeared
to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 006 is accomplished using a continuous/totalizing flow
meter.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples from Outfall 006 is performed by Prism Laboratories (NC
Laboratory Certification # 402). Prism Laboratories was not evaluated under this inspection.

"qqqq
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
©utfall 006 discharges to an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is a Cl -lV
water in the Catawba River Basin. Outfall 006 was not discharging at the time of the inspection.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM
DMR.s were reviewed for the period January through December 200 1. The reports
indicate that the facility was in compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements
during this period.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility and site appeared well operated and maintained.

VqA Michael F. Easley
Governor
NCDENR William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
C,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Ouality
January 29, 2001 11'r,atia
4-
OYCE GRUINGWORTH
Williams Energy Ventures FF
)NE WILLIAMS CENTER
LTLSA, OK 74172
Subject: Renewal Noticc'Q"p"• M m"
'U!"AtAU
NPDES Permit I
Paw Creek terminal (site
Mecklenburg County
)ear Permittee:
The subject permit expires on August 31, 2001. North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NC AC 21I.0105(c)) requires
hat an application for permit renewal be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. If you have already
nailed your renewal application, you may disregard this notice.
est renewal of the permit by this date may result in a civil assessment of at least $500,00. Larger p
iding upon the delinquency of the request.
T wastewater discharge will occur after August 31, 2001 (or if continuation of the permit is desired)
! renewed, Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General
It in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day,
Division's Compliance Enforcement Unit at [phone], extension 547. You may also contact the Mooresville Regiona
Office at [phone] to begin the rescission process.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package, The checklist identifies the items you must submit,
the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me. My telephone number, fax number and e-mv
address are listed at the bottom of this page,
Sincerely,
A
Charles H. Weaver,jr.
NPDES Unit
cc: Central FileNI'DES Fite
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/NPDES e-mail: [e-mail]

NPDES Permit NCO0051 5
Williams Energy Ventures
Mecklenburg County
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
U A cover litter requesting renewal of the permit and doc
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and t
U The completed application form. (copy attached), sign
Representative. Submit one signed originaland two copies.
U if an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engi.
the 'renewal package, written documentation an must be rovi+
such Authorized Representative (see fart 11.1 .11.b of the exi
A narrative description of the sludge management plan for
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled
plan (car the permitted facility does not generate ;any solids),
original and two';copies.
e following items must be submitted ONLY by Ind
wastewater:
U industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see A
Federal Regulations, fart 122) roust submit a Priority Poll
C',F*R Dart' 12 .21. if the PPA is not completed within'
application package without the PPA. Submit the PPA as so
The above requirement dries .1 OTapplty torounic
PLEASE NOTE
:Due to a change in fees effective January 1, 1999, tber(
application packa i
Send the completed renewal
r. Charles rl H. Weavi
NC DENR / Water Quality /
1617 bail Service ce
Raleigh, NC 7 99-
S Unit
facility since
G Authorized
ant) prepares
egated to any
dge (or ether
it one signed
rocess
, submit the
001.
c'lttr'es

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., GovernorDENr
�It r
Bill Holman, Secretary �
g/ Try 1 RTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director "ONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRc
November 15, 1999`KK
r. Steve Moan
Williams Energy Ventures
One Williams Center, MD 3-40
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification - Ownership,
Permit NCO005185
(formerly Amoco tail Company)
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mona:
In accordance with your request received May 3, 1999 the Division is forwarding the subject perry
modification. This modification documents the change in ownership at the subject facility, and dele
monitoring requirements for outfaU 005. Outfall 005 will be operated by Amoco Oil Company, and will
covered under NPDES permit NCG a 10436. All other terms and conditions in the original permit remain
unchanged and in full effect`. This permit modification is issued tinder the requirements of North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement t between North Carolina and the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit modific
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty 1
days following receipt of this letter." This request must be a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of
North Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 2744
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and bindir
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required b
Division of Water Quality. the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Fed
Local government permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please c
Charles Weaver at the telephone number or address listed below.
Sincerelv,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files

Permit NCO0051 5
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL SOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO ][DISCHARGEWASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute ] 4-21.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,'
Williams Energy Ventures
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfall 006 located at the
Paw Creek Terminal
NC highway 27
Paw Creek
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Long Creek in the Neuse
River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective November 15, 1999.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2001.
Signed this day November 15, 1999.
inal Signed
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

SUPPLEMENT
Williams Energy V(
i Mecklenburg County.
-ntures is l
wastewater
ay authorized to:
which includes;
)adin€ dock areas
used for washing; or
classified Class WS-IV waters in the Catawba River Basin.

Permit
A. (1 «) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND M©NITO NG REQUIREMENTS - FIN.
Luring the period beginning on the
ee as specified. below.
,e date of the permit and lasting until expiration
autfall 006. Such discharges shall be limited a
1 r 1 I Alu r� !■
Orel R3�10111111111�
Footnotes:
l . Where no measurable discharge occurs, "no discharge" should be clearly noted on the subm
monthly discharge monitoring report. Flow may be monitored in one of four ways:
a) Measure flow continuously,
b) Calculate flow based on the area draining to the outfall the built upon area, and the tots
rainfall (this method should not be used at facilities that have large grinds to rolled
surface water runoff),
c) Estimate by flow measurement at 20 minute intervals during the entire discharge event;
d) Base flow on pump logs
2. Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface of a
quiescent (calm water) zone.
3. EPA Method 625 includes 5 chlorophenols. if one or more of the chlorophenols is detected
concentrations > 56 µ/l, the perittee will be required to analyze for the eight chloropheno
listed below in addition to EPA Method 625. This additional monitoring will begin with the r
scheduled sampling event and occur on a semi-annual basis thereafter until expiration of tl
permit. The eight additional chlorophenols are:
• 3-chlorophenol
• 4-chloirophenol
• 2,3-dihlorophenol
• 2,5-dichlorophenol
• 2,6-dichlorophenol
• 3,4-dichlorophenol
• 2.3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol
• 3-methyl-6-hlorohenol
4. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 4-hour), Annual (see Condition A. (2.).
There shad be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
There shalt be no "direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shalt be no direct discharge of tank (or pipe) contents following hydrostatic testing
benzene concentration is less than 1.19 ttg jt and toluene concentration is less than 11 Ar

Permit NCO0051 °5
A. (2.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (Annual)
The permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using delimit
Document EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measurin
Effluents to Freshwater and MarineOrganisms." The monitorii
as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephates prome ) 4-hour static test
self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste tree
will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginnix
calendar year of the ;effective date of the permit. The annual to
be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity t
performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requ
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing
part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Dis
for the month in which it was performed; using the appropriate
Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the follc
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all suppc
chemical/physical measurements performed in association wit
well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of these
must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disi
stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirement
by the North Carolina Division: of Water Quality indicate' paten,
receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified t(
monitoring requirements' or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cit
minimum control organism survival and appropriate environm
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up
completed no later than the last day of the month following th(
monitoring.

PART 1
following schedule -
shall comply with Final Effluent Lindtations by the effective date of the permit o
below.
mts ass spa �++,. ....» -- .. -
s at optimum efficiency.
y.
notice shall include thecause of noncompliance, any remedial actions n, and me
probability of meeting the next schedule requirements.

Pan 11
Page I of 14
PART 11
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES PERMITS
1. Permit Issuins Authority
The Director of the Division of Water Quality.
2. DEM or "the Division"
Means the Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.
3.
Used herein means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
4. ct or "the Act"
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 USC
1251, et. seq.
5. M_as§LDa4M0Lu_re—mj_nt
I
a. The "monthly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges sampled
and/or measured during a calendar month on which daily discharges are sampled and
measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampled and/or measured during such
month. It is therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the weights of the pollutant found
each day of the month and then dividing this sum by the number of days the tests were
reported. The limitation is identified as "Monthly Average' in Part I of the perrrdt.
b. The "weekly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges sampled
and/or measured during the calendar week (Sunday - Saturday) on which daily discharges are
sampled and measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampled and/or measured
during such week. it is, therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the weights of
pollutants found each day of the week and then dividing this sum by the number of days the
tests were reported. This lirnitation is identified as "Weekly Average' in Part I of the permit.
c. The "maximum daily discharge' is the total mass, (weight) of a pollutant discharged during a
calendar day. If only one sample is taken during any calendar day the weight of pollutant
calculated from it is the "maximum daily discharge." This limitation is identified as "Daily
Maximum," in Part I of the permit.
d. The "average annual discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges sampled
and/or measured during the calendar year on which daily discharges are sampled and
measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampled and/or measured during such
year. it is, therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the weights of pollutants found each
day of the year and then dividing this sum by the number of days the tests were reported. This
limitation is defined as "Annual Average' in Part I of the permit.

ParE 11
Page 3 of14
. Other Measurements
a. Flow, ( GD): The flow limit expressed in this permit is the 24 hours average flaw, averaged
monthly. It is determined as the arithmetic mean of the total daily flows recorded during the
calendar month.
b. An "instantaneous flow m sur enf' is a measure of flaw taken at the time of sampling, when
both the `sample and flow will be representative of the total discharge.
c. A "continuous flow measurement" is a measure of discharge flow from the facility which occurs
continually without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility. Flow shall be
monitored continually except for the infrequent tunes when there may be no flow or for
frequent maintenance activities on the flow device.
. "T s of Samoles
a. Composite Sample: A composite sample shall consist of:
(1) a series of grab samples collected at equal time intervals over a 24 hour period of discharge
and combined proportional to the rate of flow measured at the time of individual sample
collection, or
(2) a series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24 hour period with the time
intervals between samples determined by a preset number of gallons passing the sampling
pointi, flow measurement between sample intervals shall be determined by use of a flow
recorder and totalizer, and the present gallon interval between sample collection fixed at
no greater than 1 /24 of the expected total daily flowat the treatment system, or
(3)' a single, continuous sample collected over a 24 hour period proportional to the rate of flow.
In accordance with (1) above, the time interval between influent grab samples shall be no
greater than once per hour, and the time interval between effluent grab samples shall be no
greater than once per hour except at wastewater treatment systems having a detention time of
greater than 24 hours. In such cases, effluent grab samples may be collected at time intervals
evenly spaced over the 24 hour period which are equal in number of hours to the detention time
of the system in number of days. However, in no case may the time interval between effluent
grab samples be greater than six (6) hours nor the number of samples less than four (4) during a
24 hour sampling period.
b. Grab Sample: Grab samples are individual samples collected over a period of time not
exceeding 15 minutes; the grab sample can be taken manually. Grab' samples must be
representative of the discharge or the receiving waters.
. Calculation of Means
a Arithmetic Mean: The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation of the individual
values divided by the number of individual values.
b. Geometric Mean: The geometric mean of any set of values is the Nth root of the product of the
individual values where N is equal to the number of individual values. The geometric mean is
equivalent to the antilog of the arithmetic mean of the logarithms of the individual values.
For purposes of calculating the geometric mean, values of zero (0) shall be considered to be one
(1)•
c. Weighted by Flow Value: Weighted by flow value means the summation of each concentration
times its respective flow divided by the summation of the respective flows.

Part H
Page 4 of 14
1Q. dal or av
A calendar day is defined as the period
However, for purposes of this permit, a
th- —le dar day mav be used for samoliT
I ' us S fan
ie 24-hour period that reasonably reps
if the Clean Water Act.
P 1 utan
do pollutant is any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 30 (a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.
4 B. GENERAL COND 4
l
s

Part H
Page 5 of 14
2. 2uV-JQ-Mitig&1S
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or
disposal in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting
human health or the environment.
3. < Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing" (Part 11, C-4) and "Power Failures" (Part 11,
C-7), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any responsibilities,
liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NC 143-215.3, 143-215.6 or Section 309 of
the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential damages,
such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily
suspended.
4. Oil and Hazardous Substance _Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve
the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may
be subject to under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USG 1321.
Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills, even
though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
5. Pry r)ertv- Richts
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property,
or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of
personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.
6. Qnshgre or _Qffshore ConstG1g_tJ&n_
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical
structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.
7. 5g —ve—r —ab —il i
The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this pennit, or the application
of any provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of such
provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby.
8. Duly to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any
information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for
modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this
permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority upon request, copies Of
records required to be kept by this permit.
9. D.Dut to Ream v
If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of
this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit.

e ,_ �,
L Lt � �
�,,
♦. ®.» *� »� A .�
s •� � +"
•• a; • • • �' ♦ t
•• •'
• • •
•
i
',�..' i
f. � • ! �. �. is # •"
� «
.�
i � •.: . •.. • •
� d . � a
. � � �
.. � �, �.
• � ' :. • 4 i
a, +
f • �
.. .:
• • M
.+ � ♦ � �
• • •.
� ®.. • • • i
•
�s � +
*. .» �. ..
• ♦ is • "• ii
µ *.: • .:.
*- t
M''

Part 11
Page 8 of 14
3. 1
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary
to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this
permit.
4. arsine of TreatmentE a slides
himi
a Definitions
4c--- v%r%r#,r%n r%f n +rP,%tmPnt
required in Part II, E. 6. of this permit. (24 hour notice).
d. Prohibition of Bypass
(1) Bypass is prohibited and the Pem-dt Issuing Authority may take enforcement action a
a pern-dttee for bypass, unless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe prc
damage;
(B) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary trey
facilities, retention of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal peric
equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment t
have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engine.enng judgment to prevent a t
which occurred during no periods of equipment downtime or preventive mainte
and
(C) The permittee submitted notices as required under Paragraph c. of this section.
(2) The Permit Issuing Authority may approve an anticipated bypass, after consideri
adverse affects, if the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the
conditions listed above in Paragraph d. (1) of this section.

Part I
Page 9 of 1
fi
a. Definition.
"Upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary
noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the
reasonable control of the permittee An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent
caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment
facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
b. Effect of an upset.
An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such
technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph c. of this
condition are met. o determination made during administrative review of claims that
noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final
administrative action subject to judicial review.
c. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset.
Apermittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:
(1) An upset occurred and that the pern-tittee can identify the cause(s)'of the upset;
(2) The permittee facility was at the time being properly operated, and
(3) e pe ttee submitted notice of the upset as required in fart Il, E. 6. (b) (B) of this pe it.
(4) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part 11, B. 2. of this
permit.
d. Burden of proof.
In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has
the burden of proof.
6. Re -moved Substances
Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of
wastewaters shall be utilized /disposed of in accordance with NCGS 143-215.1 and in a manner such
as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering waters of the State or navigable
waters of the United States. The permittee shall comply with all existing federal regulations
governing the disposal of sewage sludge. Upon promulgation of 40 CFR Part 503, any pertnit issued
by the Permit Issuing Authority for the utilization/disposal of sludge be reopened and
Th
modified, or revoked and reissued, to incorporate applicable uiremets at 4t} Part 503.e
permittee shall comply with applicable 40 CFR Part 503 Standards for the Use and. Disposal of
Sewage Sludge (when promulgated) within the time provided in the regulation, lation, even if the permit
is not modified to incorporate' the requirement. The permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing
Authority of any significant change in its sludge use or disposal practices.
7. owes Failures
The permittee is responsible for maintaining adequate safeguards as required by DEM Regulation,
Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H .0124 ,Reliability, to prevent the
discharge of untreated ar inadequately treated wastes during electrical power failures either by
means of alternate power sources, standby generators or retention of inadequately treated affluent.

Part 11
Page 11 of 14
reporting levels below permit discharge requirements, then the most sensitive (method with the
lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must be used.
5. Penalties_fp_r-
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders
inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this pern-dt shall,
upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for
not more than two years per violation, or by both, If a conviction of a person is for a violation
committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not
more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both.
6. Bsm—rdL—Rey jkn-1-iQn-
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the permittee's
sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five
years for longer as required by 40 CFR 503), the permittee shall retain records of all monitoring
information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart
recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit,
for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample, measurement, report ot application.
This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time.
7. Recording RCM&a
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit, the permittee
shall record the following information:
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;
c. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
8. InsDectionand Entry
7be pern-dttee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized
contractor acting as a representative of the Director), upon the presentation of credentials and other
documents as may be required by law, to;
a. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions
of this permit,
c. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as
otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location.

Part 11
Page 12 of 14
1. hana�in Uihar
,requirements as may be necessary under the Clears Water Act.
Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit.
a. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (D ) (See Part 11.
of this pe t) or forms provided by the Director for reporting results of monitoring of sl dg
ordisposal practices.
b. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by the permit, usin
procedures specified in Part 11, D. 4. of this permit or in the case of sludge use or lisp
approved under 40 C R 503, or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring sh<
included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DM .
c. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements shall utili
arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified by the Director in the pe t.

Part TI
Wage 13 of 14
6. Tw nt four I -lour R rtin
a. The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any
noncompliance'which may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be
provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee became aware of the
circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 days of the time the
permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a
description of the noncompliance, and its cause; the period of'noncompliance, including exact
dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue, and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate,' ;and prevent reoccurrence
of the noncompliance.
b. The following shall be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours under
this paragraph:
(1) Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit.
(2) Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit.
(3) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed by the
Director in the permit to be reported within 24 hours.
c. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under paragraph
b. above of this condition if the oral 'report has been received within 24 hours.
2. Other Noncomnliance
e pern-dttee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under fart II. E. 5 and 6. of
this p t at the time .monitoring reports.are submitted. The reports shall contain the information
listed in Part II. E. 6. of this permit.
8, Other Inf nation
Where the permittee becomes'aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit
application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the
Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
9. Noncompliance Notification
e permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional
office of the Division as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working
day fallowing the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following
a. Any'occurrence at the water pollution control facility which results in the discharge of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic,; such as the
dumping of the contents of a sludge digester, the known passage of a slug of hazardous substance
through the facility, or any other unusual circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility incapable of
adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, aerators,
compressors, etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass
directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such
station or facility.

Part 11
Page 14 of 1
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form wi
5 days following first knowledge of the occurrence.
0 Availabilit f I2 ort`
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 14 -21 . (){ ) or Section 308 of
or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both.

OTHER R)
A.. Construction
zation, to Construct has been issued.
One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug/
^
or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that disc
exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/1);
(2) One milligram per liter (I mg/1) for antimony;
(3) Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in I
The permittee shall continually evaluate all wastewater disposal alternatives and pursut
environmentally sound alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the fa
substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit or goven
regulations or laws, the permittee shall submit a report in such form and detail as requii
Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan of action within sixty (60) days of notificat
Division

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment „
and Natural Resources •
Division of Water dualityNow
T
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary AW
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL. RESOURCES
February 2, 1999
Mr. J.W. Scrivner
Amoco (ail Company
375 Northridge Road, Suite 350
Atlanta, Georgia 30 50-3296
Subject: fetter to Require Effluent
Turbidity Monitoring
Permit No. NBC O00518
Amoco Oil Company
Mecklenburg County
Roar Mr. Scrivner:
As you are aware, the turbidity monitoring requirement was eliminated from your
permit upon renewal in August 1996. Although turbidity monitoring was eliminated, total
suspended, solids (TSS) monitoring with a limit remains in the permit. It was the Division's
contention that should monitoring data indicate TSS problems, the state has the option of
enforcing the instrearn standard for turbidity. However, the SPA is still concerned with the
removal of the turbidity monitoring requirement from several oil terminal discharge permits.
The following paragraphs address that concern.
During the research phase required for permit development, it was noted that the 14
permits in the Paw Creek area had vastly different requirements for solids measurements.'
Permits contained any combination of total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, and settleable
solidsmonitoringand/or limits. In an effort to provide consistency, TSS, turbidity, d
settleable solids results from six oil terminals in the Paw Creek area were examined from
,duly 194 through September 1995. Results showed. that TSS and turbidity exhibited
similar trends. Both pollutants appeared to increase and decrease at the same time. I
addition, for the period examined, there were no turbidity violations, although there were'a
few TSS violations. These data resulted in the Division questioning whether monitoring y
was necessary for both solids parameters. Was there an added benefit to requiring turbidity
monitoring in addition to TSSmonitoring? The Division concluded that turbidity was
correlated with TSS results, and thus, only TSS monitoring with a limit was required. In
addition, North Carolina has a water quality standard for turbidity. Therefore, although
turbidity monitoring is not required in the discharge permits, the State still has the authority
to enforce the instre. turbidity standard.
P.O. Box 29535„ Raleigh, North Carolina 7626- 535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

. Scrivner
February 22, 1999
Page 2
Based on concerns regardinganti-backsliding, the EPA requested the Division re-
examine the basis for the elimination of turbidity monitoring for 12 of the 14 Paw Creek
oil terminals that were required to monitor for turbidity prior to the most recent permit
renewal. This second examination of the data showed that there were turbidity standard
violations since the last analysis at several of the oil terminals. The Division will
investigate the causes of these violations to determine what steps may be necessary to
controlsolids levels at these sites. Therefore, the Division acknowledges that its second
evaluation resulted in a different outcome from the initial investigation and agrees that
turbidity monitoring should be added to the discharge permits for several of'the oil
terminals. This letter serves as the official notice that quarterly turbidity monitoring
will be required at the facility effective March 1 1999. If ; monitoring data show a
reasonable potential to violate water duality standards, then limits will be imposed upon
renewal.
If you have any questions concerning this change, please contact Bethany :dolt at
91) 733-583, extension 551.
Sincerely,
reston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc. Central Files
Water Quality Section
DES" Unit
Point Source Compliance Enforcement Linn