820729_Inspection_20201211

Facility Number
pD Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
firficp
�F
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1121 i 'L0
Farm Name: Co it e Farm
Owner Name: V qrren SWIM fur(' inc
•`f0
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: CI M N Region: Fro
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: r k)rt-t 7 Pia rw C Title: I Pr, H GjP-PC
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Brcindcr wa r re n
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
et././ ,33.4(A0k Integrator:
Latitude:
Phone:
sll�i�h �i�l�
Certification Number: VI I
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Cj(tfii
Fryn
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop:.,
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the` estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes e' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: C)v. - '7 7
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: 12 J 11, 2,0
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
es ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes LJ 1V E NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
/(19
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
E Yes I_ INo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 01 ❑ NA E NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? E Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes D�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground E Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAcceptableCrop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift I ❑,r�Application (Outside ofApprovedArea
12. Crop Type(s): e�.1 1 r U d a J wet -Geed / corn / 4� h P rit G ,O) G
13. Soil Type(s): \/V c 9ra)f, N Or-FO I (
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 1171 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Yes []No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 12<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []'�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 121--To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 12'1<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes qn No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: 121II Z_ty
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 1
❑ Yes 1E1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes jJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes yi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ]No ❑NA ❑NE
Commentsi(refer.to question #) `Explain any,YES answers=andlor any additionalrecommendatzons or any other comment
max_
Use drawings of;facihty to better explain ituations.(use`.additional pages'as necessary).;
�o Jvsr mq je 5ut qii pgge o f Ir I For! Gp
.lT - A `-//`v-s-cL
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
teno't
Phone: 91P-203-0/J!
Date:
2/4/2015