Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820473_Inspection_20201020Facility Number ivision of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Type of Visit: C mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: /-A%,; Arrival Time: Departure Time:1 /ir"3V County':��Region: O Farm Name: /C,� ,� �J— `�iisi /� �fL Li c - Owner Email: Owner Name: -/(i � C�c c ;Irv*" sGl f 1 l Phone: r Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Title: }-a-e5/ Phone: Integrator: j` i 1'-/r/` Certified Operator: )L1344j °Pa( Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: ,',-0` Certification Number: Longitude: Swine ". Design Current ,:Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder eeder to Finish Farrow to Wean �N Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other ° Other Design Current Wet -Poultry Capacity Pop.:, Layer Non -Layer Design Current D ' Poultr Ca Cattle. Design Current, Capacity Pop Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Ell< ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [} ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes la<o ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): ❑ Yes [No."" ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ENo ❑NA ❑NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 13-1 ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding E Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): ?et 13. Soil Type(s): y-u�� A(.1.0e /,� 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes J1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 13-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑-Ic o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1211 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑r No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: ff,"^, - ;u7j IDate of Inspection: /0-- 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ io ❑ NA D NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [] N ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes J ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ©N ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑1To ❑ NA .❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IENo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes Ijaf ° ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes la -No ❑ NA ❑ NE CommentsrefergtU4ifestion #) Explain any YES answers and/or,ary additional recommeudataoris or an Use drawings of facility to`better,explain situations (use additional pages:°a&necessary) # ri°6r I le•e'`- �A r- Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: 9%a' -5'N Date: ©20 2/4/201 S