20070742 Ver 1_Application_20070430

~ ~nA~a.
~ ~ >
-~~„~•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~.. ~~
~.. ,
0
tips ~,~, ~ ..
DEPARTN~NT OF TRANSPORTATION ~'ro~ ry=;; `~~~ O
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Apri127, 2007
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
ATTN: Mr. John Thomas
NCDOT Coordinator
°k~y9T ~,:, ;_
LYND`~9' IPPETT
SECRE Y~
070?d2
Subject: Nationwide Permit 23 and 33 Application for the proposed replacement of Bridge
No. 416 over Beaverdam Creek on SR 2550 in Davidson County, Federal Aid
Project No. BRSTP-2550(1), State Project No. 8.2604601,
WBS Element: 33459.1..1.1, Division 9, TIP B-4103
Dear Sir:
Please find enclosed the Categorical Exclusion (CE) Document, pre-construction notification,
permit drawings, and design plan sheets for the proposed project. The project involves replacing
Bridge No. 416 (a 72-feet long structure) with a 33-inch box girder bridge at the same location. The
new bridge will be 205-foot long and 39-feet wide with 33-inch long box girders. The new bridge
will span Beaverdam Creek. The proposed bridge will consist of two 11-foot travel lanes and 7-
foot shoulders. During construction, aone-lane two-way on-site temporary detour located south of
the existing bridge will be utilized to maintain traffic. The detour will be 200-feet in length and will
be 18-feet wide. The detour bridge will provide a 10-foot travel lane with 4-foot shoulders. The
approach roadway will consist of one 10-foot lane with 4-foot shoulders.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
General Description: The project is located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, subbasin 03-07-08
with a Hydrologic Unit Code of 03040103. Beaverdam Creek has a Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) stream index number of 12-134-(2) and is a large tributary to Badin Lake. A best usage
classification of WS-IV CA has been assigned to Beaverdam Creek. There are wetlands in the
project area. A Jurisdictional Determination (Action ID. 200620356) from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers was given for the wetlands on January 23, 2006.
Permanent Impacts: Construction of the new bridge will require the use of two bents. One of the
two bents will be constructed in the stream resulting in less than 0.01 acre of permanent stream
impacts. The bent will be approximately 3.5 feet in width. No causeways or workbridges are
needed to construct the proposed bents. Floating access to construct the bents is possible.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CAPITAL BLVD
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS SUITE 24O
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598

Temporary Impacts: There will be less than 0.01 acre of temporary fill in Beaverdam Creek due to
the construction of a temporary detour bridge. The proposed detour bridge is to be built on the
south side of the existing structure. Construction of the temporary detour bridge will require the use
of three bents. The bents will be approximately 1.0 feet in width. No causeways or workbridges are
needed to construct the proposed bents.
Utility Impacts: There will be no sewer, water, electric or other utility impacts due to this bridge
replacement project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 416 is pony truss bridge with one span at 72 feet in length and no
guardrail protection on either end. The superstructure consists of a timber deck on a low pony truss.
The substructure of the east concrete abutment has timber risers. The bridge will be removed
without dropping any components into waters of the United States. NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed.
Restoration Plan: Following construction of the bridge, all material used in the construction of the
structure will be removed. The impact area associated with the bridge is expected to recover
naturally, since the natural streambed and plant material will not be effected. NCDOT does not
propose any additional planting in this area. Class I riprap and filter fabric will be used for bank
stabilization. Pre-project elevations will be restored. NCDOT will restore the stream to its pre-
project contours. Additionally, after the detour's purpose has been served the material used for
installation of the temporary detour bridge will be removed and the areas will be restored to original
contours.
Removal and Disposal Plan: The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for the
removal of and disposal of all material off-site at an upland location. The contractor will use
excavation equipment for removal of any earthen material. Heavy-duty trucks, dozers, cranes and
various other pieces of mechanical equipment necessary for construction of roadways and culverts
will be used on site. All material placed in the stream will be removed from the stream at that time.
The contractor will have the option of reusing any of the materials that the engineer deems suitable
in the construction of project. After the erosion control devices are no longer needed, all temporary
materials will become the property of the contractor.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered
and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of March 28, 2007, the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists three federally protected species for Davidson County. Table 1 lists
the species, their status and biological conclusion.
Table 1. Federall -Protected S ecies for Davidson Coun , NC
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Habitat Biological Conclusion
Status Present
Bald eagle Haleaeetus leucephalus T Yes May Affect, Not Likely
to Adversel Affect
Schweinitz's Helianthus schweinitzii E No No Effect
sunflower
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii T (S/E) N/A Not Required
A Biological Conclusion of "No Effect" was given in the CE for Schweinitz's sunflower. Afield
survey for Schweinitz's sunflower was conducted in May 2004 and again by NCDOT Biologists in
2

August 2006. No plants were observed during the 2004 and 2006 surveys. With the above
information it is the conclusion of NCDOT that the original call of "No Effect" is still valid for the
Schweinitz's sunflower.
Biological Conclusions are not required for the Bog turtle since T (S/A) species are not afforded full
protection under the ESA. No potential habitat occurs within the project area. No populations of
this species have been reported in the project area. Therefore, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in an adverse impact to this species.
A commitment was placed on the green sheet of the CE for NCDOT to query researchers at the
Center of Conservation Biology at the College of William and Mary to determine if any additional
nesting activity has been observed in the vicinity of the project. Also, per this commitment,
NCDOT was to inform the USFWS of the inforn~ation obtained during the pre-construction interval.
All new information regarding bald eagle nesting was given to the USFWS via email on April 3,
2007.
A pre-construction bald eagle survey was conducted by NCDOT Biologists on March 27, 2007. The
survey was conducted within a 1-mile radius of the project site. During the survey it was noted that
the area around Badin Lake was more highly developed than at the time of the 2003 survey. It was
also, noted that the area within a 1-mile radius of the project has been fairly recently "cut-over" in
several spots. The habitat observed on foot and from the boat was marginal at best for the support
of bald eagle nesting. No bald eagles or bald eagle nests were observed during the survey.
Also, Mr. Bryan Watts of William and Mary was contacted on March 21, 2007 regarding nesting
activity in the project vicinity. Mr. Watts informed NCDOT that he has been flying the Badin Lake
area since the year 2000 and has never found eagle nests in the area of the project (Pine Haven area).
Also, Mr. Watts flew over the Badin Lake area on March 27, 2007. Mr. Watts indicated to NCDOT
that no new eagle nests were observed in the project area at the time of the fly over.
Also, Ms. Marla Chambers of the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) was
contacted regarding bald eagle nests on Badin Lake in the area of the project. Ms. Chambers
indicated to the NCDOT that there were no records of eagle nests in project area portion of Badin
Lake.
With the above information it is concluded that the original biological conclusion of "May Affect,
Not Likely to Adversely Affect" is still valid for the bald eagle.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
Avoidance and Minimization and Compensatory Miti atg_ ion: The NCDOT is committed to
incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional
impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional
impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and NEPA compliance stages;
minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
According to the Clean Water Act (CWA) §404(b)(1)guidelines, NCDOT must avoid, minimize,
and mitigate, in sequential order, impacts to waters of the US. The following is a list of the
project's jurisdictional stream avoidance/minimization activities proposed or completed by NCDOT:
Avoidance/Minimization:
• The proposed bridge will be replaced on its existing location.
• In-stream activity will be limited.
• Use of 2:1 fill slopes in jurisdictional area.

• No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed in
wetlands or near surface waters.
• The contractor will follow contract specifications pertaining to erosion control measures as
outlined in 23 CFR 650 Subpart B and Article 107-13 entitled "Control of Erosion, Siltation,
and Pollution" (NCDOT, Specifications for Roads and Structures).
• Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be minimized through
implementation of stringent erosion control methods and use of Best Management Practices
(BMPs).
Compensatory Miti atg ion:
Due to' the minimal amount of impacts, no compensatory mitigation is proposed.
SCHEDULE
The project calls for a letting of November 20, 2007 with a date of availability of January 1, 2007.
Permits are needed by the review date of October 2, 2007. It is expected that the contractor will
choose to start construction as soon as possible.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary impacts will be authorized under Section 404
Nationwide Permit 33. We are therefore requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33. The
remaining aspects of the project are project is being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT
requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10, pages 2020-
2095; January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate General Certification numbers 3403 and 3366 will apply to this
project. All general conditions of the Water quality Certifications will be met. Therefore, in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and 15A NCAC 2B.0200 we are providing two
copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their notification.
Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Sara Easterly at (919) 715-
5499 if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerel ,
~~
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (2 copies) Ms. Marella Buncick, NCFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E, Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit Mr. S. P. Ivey, P.E., Division Engineer
Ms. Diane Hampton, P.E., DEO
w/o attachment
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P.E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. John Conforti, PDEA Planning Engineer
4

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20G70742
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23 & NW 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and
check here: ^
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Telephone Number: 919-733-3141 Fax Number: 919-733-9794
E-mail Address: tg horpe(a~dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks
such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries
and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan
must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious
surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the
appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries
outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as
the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires
information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may
accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a
sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such
that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on
hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 416 on SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road) Over
Beaverdam Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only)
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
B-4103
County: Davidson Nearest Town: Jackson Hill
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Highway 64 West to
Junction with NC 49 South to Badin Lake Lanes to Pond Street to Badin Lake Road
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately
lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35° 30' 42" °N 80° 06' 03" °W
6. Property size (acres): Total project length is 0.205 miles
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Beaverdam Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins.. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application: Project area is located in a mostly rural communit.~with
recreational homes surrounding Badin Lake.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: See cover
letter
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Bridge No. 416 has a sufficiency rating of 18.0
out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bride is considered structurally deficient and
functionally obsolete. The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer more
efficient traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project
(including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the
USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is no prior historyof jurisdictional determinations for this project.
V, Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permit requests anticipated for thisproject.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed
separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap
dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying
site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown
on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included
at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation,
list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or
description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Pro"vide a written description of the proposed impacts: See cover letter
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized
clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on
(
ma )
Type of
Im act
p Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within

100-year Floodplain
(yes/no)
Distance to Nearest

Stream (linear feet) Area of
Impact
)
(acres
None None None NA NA None

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.00
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must
be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width and then divide by 43,560.
Stream Im act
p
Number
(indicate on map)

Stream Name

Type of Impact
Perennial or
~
Intermittent. Average
Stream Width

Before Impact
Impact
Length
(linear feet)
Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Beaverdam
Creek Bridge Bent Perennial
75 feet 36 < 0.01
1 Beaverdam
Creek Detour Bridge Perennial 75 feet 36 < 0.01

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) <0.01
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake and estua y
> P ry, sound, ba ,
ocean, etc.) Area of
p
Im act
(acres)
NA NA NA NA 0.00

Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
Page 4 of 8

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.004
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.004
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies
to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be
described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-
down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. See cover letter.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division
of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater
wetlands or greater than or equal to 1501inear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
Page 5 of 8

USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including
size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource
will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as
proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not
limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland
vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource
functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a
required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An
applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/; h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stim~ide.html:
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as
much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description
of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate
sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed for the minimal amount of stream impact
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that
they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional
information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the
appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
Page 6 of 8

• 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach
a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or
other (please identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If
buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1
2
Total
- gone ~ extenas out ju reef perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Page 7 of 8

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.usincwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose
to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work
schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened
Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
•,~,

Ap~'Iica>~Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

f~ORTH CAROB ~lA
o~
s
_o o d
~ ~; _ ~
_ s ~~
mt ~ / ~ ~ O'4M WI p,,,,d, b ~~!
,i_' ~ ~ J ~
6.. ',\
~ „ ~e„~, ~ m".r 1 aD ioc
J b ~ ~ r ~ Q° m' ~,n
m s _ ~ `§
~:,. ,
6 ~ ~ .°, i
s~ c± _ -ti 1 c
~ ~ ~'
~ ~~
e ~ / r ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~'~
r '/ie i ? ~ Bridge
~~ O \ ~; No. 416 ;l ~
i
~ `_ \ ~ s ~~ / s ~
,,,a..,..,,.. ~ i `\ ~ s \ 1
Davidson County ( 4 ~_
nlgomery unty l d
im. u q i
wnuene ~ SE \ ( ~
no.w 1
4 r°e¢T
~~ b ~c /
~ ~ f \ l
(NOT TO SCALD
b ~1 ~~®~
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
(~ 1T ~ ~ °~ ~ I)AVII9S®N C®UNTY
l~ J~ Jl I'R®JECT: (B-4103)
BRIDGE N®. 4I6 ®VER
BEAVER DAM CREEK
®N SR 2250 (BADIN LAKE R®AD>
SHEET I ®F 02 // 06 % 2000

~.• /
~ ~~~~//
z `p%/ ~
o //
/ ry \
h
~~
~~ ~~ ~.~ o
~~~
/~-~-~--
~~~
~~~ `
/ `
~-~s~
i-~
~~ -~~
~~
~- ..
~ ~S
A
~
~

~ ~
~,
~
® o
~ ~
w

~ ~
W
U ~
~
.a
® s ~ ~ ~ z
~

~ ®

z
®

a z
®
~
,

~
~;
~
~,
ti
~
z
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
o
~,
"
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
z

,~"
~~~~
G ~ /'- ~
0
l
- ~~~
l ~ 1C~
~ ~ ~~ ~
~s
a~ ~ ~m
--~
~~
~.
V
Z
O
F-
0
0
0
~I
N
w
w

~~®~~~~ 1 ~~~~~~~
NAA~IES AND ADDRESSES
NAA~IES ADDRESSES
~lminwood, Inc. ID.®. I~oa fl740 Den Eon, NC 2729

0
Z
o "
F
v
a
m a
m
a ¢
~
`~ 3 z
z
s ~
0
F Z U
O O
O
pJ
.
.-
~
~ N
~
j Q ~ C~.
¢ Q O

A 3 ~
U
Z F
w
w
x

a~
s
r o
v
_
3 -o

~ 3
L ~
~ L
N ~
v
3 -moo
3
0
~ o
ri ~
~ o

.3
4
~
3
•a N
m ~
L ~a
F-
N
U1 .L-.
U
~
C
a
E m
L
d ~
3 w

m
U
~ N
7 •C
N N
C (,.)
f0 d
-
a 3
a~
L = ~
.3 ~
c ~ m
~ ~ w
~
m ~
a ~
~s~. E
-_ O N
C ~
N ~ N
~ U
w c
ti
a>
~ ~
j
U Q~ `
M N
N N N
7 w
C
~ O
~
~
O
~
~
N
a
w ~ w rn
w v
i° `o ~i ~

~ N ~
z
a
m ~

_~~~
Z
c~o
m a~ w
C C U
~ ~
m a
H ~
in
'
U RL EH
Q W U -

C
C C
~ U C

~ W U - d

w
Q N

d U ~.
~ _
O
~
a ~ ~ a~
~ 0 0
c
n ~
>- ~ ~
C U V O ~
Q ~ ~ p_ fD
~ v O
V O
V
~ ~
a

~ m -~'o

H
U c ~
~
~ ~
m ~
,..
d = V ~
~
_
H
N
N C ~
- U
°~ m
r
m
W a
i
U.~ v
~ ~' ~
U
Q a m
~ ~ o
~ ~ m

7~ Z
Q
X
U
J W
w
~
a c
~ ~
H LL j v
>
c C
~
m = m ~
E LL
a~

N
•D N

N d X
~ m
a
7 ~ [Q ~
O
_
~ ~ M

~ N
~
~
~ Q

~- ~
o
o °
N
H
w
J a' ~
W
~ ~ ~

7 O
~
C °
H
o V ~
~ °
~° o ~ ~ N ~
Cn v ~
N J ~ W
Z ~ O p

~ ~ ~
W O

O
Q

«~ O J
~
(~ Z ~
H

SR 2550 ~Badin Lake Road)
Bridge No. 416 Over Beaverdam Creek
Davidson County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-2550(1)
State Project No. 8.2604601
WBS No. 33459.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4103
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIMSTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
!2.2Z•~ ~ ~/<
DATE `~~ Gregory J. Tho h.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
~~ - ;~ .~
DATE ~~~ John F. Sullivan, III, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road)
Bridge No. 416 Over Beaverdarn Creek
Davidson County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-2550(] )
State Project No. 8.2604601
WBS No. 33459.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4103
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
December 2005
Document Prepared by:
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants
ate J. A. Bissett, Jr., PE
Vice President
20 ~ G0~" ~~L/
Date Pamela R. Williams
Project Manager
~ep~999A9BF9Dada
~eC ?
4~0 .R.~~ CAS ~~~' °0s~,
C °e°^n~i^a_ i'e1 de
~ o~~~r Cam..+1t.k~i~ =~~ ~°i
` O ~ °° ~
w°
" ~ 5E RL r °s e
so 1~Y4342(~~L 4
~ !Y
0<0 i^ °•io Ci° t ~~ qb~
\S \
rlP,i pC A `p ?C 9 ~ `,a,9i,
Document Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
I Z Z~ G~
Date n Co ',
Project Planning Engineer

~~
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road)
Bridge No. 416 Over Beaverdam Creek
Davidson County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-2550(1)
State Project No. 8.2604601
WBS No. 33459.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4103
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit No. 23 Conditions. the General Nationwide Permit Conditions,
Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for
Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, Design Standards for Sensitive Watersheds,
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive Watersheds, Erosion and Sediment Control
Guidelines for Contract Construction, Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance
Activities, General Certification Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of Certification, the following
special commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
Project Development and Envirotzmental Analysis Branc)t
Prior to project advertising a query will be made of the researchers (Center for Conservation Biology at the
College of William and Mary in cooperation with Alcoa Power Generating, Inc) to determine if any
additional nesting activity has been observed in the vicinity of the project. Information obtained during this
pre-construction interval must be communicated to the USFWS in Asheville to ensure that the department
has met its obligations under Section 7. If additional nesting activity is reported at that time, it will be
necessary to continue consultation with the USFWS and the NCWRC.
NCDOT will develop a plan for the bridge relocation that will include the potential recipient (City of
Albemarle) and Alcoa representatives.
Roadway Design/Division
A meeting with Alcoa will be scheduled at right-of-way stage for awalk-through with Mr. Robert Smet
(704j 422-5678.
Two copies of right-of-way plans will be provided to: Mr. Robert Smet
Yadkin Power and Property Coordinator
Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
Yadkin Division
Post Office Box 576
Badin, North Carolina 28009-0576
Hydraulic Desigzz
Deck drains will not discharge directly into Badin Lake/Beaverdam Creek.
Green Sheet
Categorical Exclusion
December 2005
Page 1 of 1

SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road)
Bridge No. 416 Over Beaverdam Creek
Davidson County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-2550(1)
State Project No. 8.2604601
WBS No. 33459.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4103
INTRODUCTION: The replacement of Bridge No. 416 is included in the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement Program (T.LP.) and in the Federal-Aid
Bridge Replacement Program. The location of the bridge is shown in Figure 1. No substantial environmental
impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion."
I. PURPOSE AND NEED
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate that Bridge No. 416 has a sufficiency rating of 18.0 out of
a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.
The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Bridge No. 416 is located on SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road) about 30 miles south of Lexington, the county seat.
SR 2550 is classified as "rural local" by the statewide functional classification system. It connects NC 8 to
NC 109 around the northern finger of Badin Lake, and is within the Uwharrie National Forest proclamation
boundary. The Uwharrie National Forest land is located 600 to 700 feet north of this project (Figure 2). SR
2550 is a rural two-lane roadway that serves recreational travel to Badin Lake and provides access to
Uwharrie Game Land.
Bridge No. 416 crosses Beaverdam Creek at the headwaters of an arm of Badin Lake (Narrows Reservoir).
Narrows Reservoir is one of the developments of Project No. 2197, a hydroelectric project which Alcoa
Power Generating Incorporated (APGI) is licensed to operate by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC). The Yadkin Division of APGI is responsible for operating Project No. 2197. The Beaverdam
Creek/Grassy Fork Creek Significant Natural Heritage Area is upstream of the project area.
Land use near the project site is rural, with recreational homes surrounding Badin Lake. There has been no
substantial residential development in the past 11 years; however, there is a landowner who owns 100 to 200
acres near the bridge, and plans to develop it with a golf course and some residences. Some commercial
growth is also expected near the intersection of SR 2550 and NC 49. There are no current plans to upgrade
this roadway at or in the vicinity of the project.
The 2005 estimated average daily traffic (ADT) volume is 670 vehicles per day (vpd). The projected ADT is
1100 vpd by the design year 2030. The percentages of truck traffic are 3% dual tired vehicles (DUALS) and
1%truck-tractor semi trailer (TTST). The speed limit in the vicinity of the bridge is not posted; therefore, a
statutory speed limit of 55 miles per hour (mph) applies.
Bridge No. 416 was built in 1920 and is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. It is a
one-lane facility with a clear roadway width of I5 feet (Figure 3). The pony truss bridge has one span at 72
feet in length and no guardrail protection on either end. The superstructure consists of a timber deck on a
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 1

low steel pony truss. The substructure west end bent has timber caps, posts, and sills. The substructure of
the east concrete abutment has timber risers. The bridge deck is approximately 13 feet from crown to
streambed. The posted weight limit is 9 tons for single vehicle and 14 tons for TTST.
The approach roadway consists of two 1 1-foot lanes with 5-foot grass shoulders, which tapers to one 13-foot
lane at the bridge with 5-foot turf shoulders. The sag vertical curve at the bridge has a design speed of 35
mph. There are two curves adjacent to the ends of Bridge No. 416. The curve radius east of the bride is
approximately 1,250 feet and west of the bridge is approximately 1,300 feet. The existing right of way is
approximately 50 feet with no control access.
There is a water line, stormwater collection system, and an overhead power line located north of SR 2550, on
the upstream side of Bridge No. 416. Overhead telephone and fiber optic lines are located south of Badin
Lake Road, on the downstream side of the bridge. Utility impacts are anticipated to be low.
No Davidson County school buses cross Bridge No. 416; however, there are a total of four bus crossings
daily from Montgomery County schools.
No accidents were reported in the project area during the period from June 1, 2002 to June 31, 2005.
This section of SR 2550 in Davidson County is not part of a designated bicycle route nor is it listed in the
T.I.P. as needing incidental bicycle accommodations.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The recommended replacement structure is a bridge providing two 11-foot travel lanes and 7-foot shoulders
(Figure 4A). A minimum 0.3 percent grade is recommended to facilitate bridge deck drainage. The length
and width of the new structure may be increased or decreased as necessary to accommodate peak flows and
contain deck drainage as determined by more detailed hydrologic studies during the final design phase.
The proposed approach roadway will consist of two 11-foot travel lanes with 7-foot turf shoulders (Figure
4A).
B. Build Alternatives
Two build alternatives were studied for this project. They are described below.
Alternative B (preferred) will replace the bridge in-place (Figure SA). The proposed bridge will be
approximately 200 feet in length. During construction, aone-lane two-way on-site temporary detour located
south (downstream) of the existing bridge will be utilized to maintain traffic.
The detour bridge will provide a 10-foot travel lane with 4-foot shoulders (Figure 4B). The approach
roadway will consist of one 10-foot lane with 4-foot shoulders. The detour will be signal controlled.
Alternative D replaces the bridge on new alignment north (upstream) of the existing structure (Figure SB).
The proposed bridge will be approximately 200 feet in length. Traffic will be maintained on the existing
structure during construction.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 2

C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Study
Alternative A would replace the bridge in-place. The proposed bridge would be approximately 200 feet in
length. During construction, traffic will be routed off-site along the following detour: SR 2550 (Badin Lake
Road), NC 49, and NC 109. The detour is approximately 15 miles in length. This alternative was eliminated
due to the unacceptable delay and the high road user cost associated with this detour that is approximately
$1,283,000 annually.
Alternative C replaces the bridge on new alignment south (downstream) of the existing structure. The
proposed bridge will be approximately 205 feet in length. Traffic would be maintained on the existing
structure during construction of the new bridge. Alternative C was eliminated because Alternative B impacts
less wetland and forest.
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not desirable due to the
traffic service provided by the bridge and lack of feasible alternative routes.
Investigation of the existing structure by the Bridge Maintenance Unit indicates that "rehabilitation" of this
bridge is not feasible because of its age and deteriorated condition.
D. Preferred Alternative
Alternative B was selected as the preferred alternative because it minimizes wetland impacts and will not
take the residential house in the northwest quadrant.
The Division Engineer concurs with Alternative B as the preferred.
E. Design Exception
A design exception for the vertical curve in the project area maybe required. The speed limit in the
vicinity of the bridge is not posted; therefore, a statutory speed limit of 55 miles per hour (mph) applies.
The existing sag vertical alignment has a design speed of approximately 35 mph. If a design exception is
applicable, then advisory signing will be evaluated during the final design phase.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 3

IV. ESTIMATED COST
Table 1 shows the estimated costs of the proposed project based on current prices.
Table 1. Estimated Cost
Alternative B
( referred) Alternative D
Structure Removal (Existing) $ ] 5,100 $ 15,100
Pro osed Structure 627,300 627,300
Tem orar Detour Bride and A roaches 312,100 0
Roadwa A roaches 185,000 426,300
Miscellaneous & Mobilization 290,500 321,300
En ineerina Contingencies 220,000 210,000
ROW/Const. Easements/LJtilities 91,000 91,000
TOTAL $1,741,000 $1,691,000
The estimated cost of the project as shown in the 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement Program is
$1,075,000, including $75,000 for right-of-way, $900,000 for construction and $100,000 in prior years.
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
A. Methodology
Research was conducted prior to field investigation. Published resource information pertaining to the project
area was gathered and reviewed. Resources utilized in this preliminary investigation of the project area
included:
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle maps (Handy)
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) quadrangle
map (Handy)
• NCDOT aerial photograph of project area
• Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly known as Soil Conservation Service, Soil
Survey of Rowan County, North Carolina (1995)
Water resource information was obtained from publications posted on the World Wide Web by North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Information
concerning the occurrence of federal protected species in the study area was obtained from the USFWS list of
protected and candidate species (on-line list researched 2/11/05, last updated 2/11/03), and from the NC
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database of rare species and unique habitats (on-line list researched
December 2, 2005, last updated January 2004). NCNHP maps were reviewed on April 25, 2005 for
documented occurrences of state or federal listed species and locations of significant natural areas.
General natural resource surveys and federal protected species surveys were conducted along the proposed
alignment on August 1, 2001, September 1 1, 2001, and May 18, 2004. Water resources were identified and
their physical characteristics recorded. Plant communities and associated wildlife were also identified and
described. Terrestrial community classifications generally follow Schafale and Weakley (1990) where
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 4

possible, and plant taxonomy follows Radford et a/. (1968). Vertebrate taxonomy follows Martof et al.
(1980), Potter et al. (1980), and Webster et al. (1985). Predictions of wildlife community composition
involved general qualitative habitat assessment based on existing vegetative communities. Wildlife
identification involved using a variety of observation techniques. Techniques included active searching and
identification of characteristic wildlife signs (sounds, scat, tracks, and burrows).
Jurisdictional wetlands, if present, were delineated and evaluated based on criteria established in the U. S.
Arn-ti~ Corps of Engineers Wetlands Deli-ieation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) and Guida-zce for
Rating the Values of Wetlands i-- North Carolina (Division of Environmental Management, 1995). Wetlands
were classified based on the classification scheme of Cowardin et al. (1979).
For the purposes of this document, the following terms are used concerning the limits of natural resources
investigations. "Project area" denotes the area bounded by the proposed right-of-way limits along the full
length of the project alignment. "Project vicinity" is defined as an area extending one mile on all sides of
the project area, and "Project region" denotes an area equivalent in size to the area represented by a 7.5
minute USGS quadrangle map, i.e. (61.8 sq. mi.). "Study area" denotes the area that was covered during the
natural resource surveys.
B. Physiography and Soils
Davidson County is in the center of the Piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina. Most of the
county is characterized by gently rolling to hilly landscapes. County elevations range from 510 feet above
mean sea level (msl) at Badin Lake to 1,180 feet in the Uwharrie Mountains. Project elevations average 525
feet above msl. The county is drained by the Yadkin River and its tributaries, which flow south or
southwestward.
There is one soil type located in the project area. A brief description of the soil type is provided below.
Oakboro silt loam, frequently flooded (Ok) is a nearly level, moderately well to somewhat poorly
drained soil found on floodplains along streams and drainageways throughout Davidson County.
Permeability is moderate and the depth to the seasonal high water table is between 12 and 24 inches .
The surface layer is typically a brown silt loam extending about 6 inches below the surface. The
subsoil is moderately shallow, with bedrock reached at about 43 inches below the surface, and has a
low shrink-swell potential. The main limitations with this soil are wetness and the Capability Unit ,
which is 1Vw. Although this soil is wet and frequently flooded, it is not on the North Carolina
Hydric Soils List (NRCS, 1995).
C. Water Resources
1. Waters Impacted
The project is located in the Yadkin River Drainage Basin. There is one water resource in the project study
area: Beaverdam Creek. SR 2550 crosses Beaverdam Creek, which is a tributary that forms a major arm of
Badin Lake.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 5

2. Water Resource Characteristics
Beaverdam Creek at SR 2550 is approximately 75 to l00 feet wide and is lacustrine (upper section of Badin
Lake). The substrate is composed primarily of silt.
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the DWQ, which reflects water quality conditions
and potential resource usage. The classification for Beaverdam Creek (DWQ Index No. 12-134-(2), 8/3/92)
is WS-IV CA. Class WS-IV (Water Supply N) refers to those waters protected as water supplies which are
generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds, and are suitable for all class C uses (aquatic life
propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture). The CA (Critical Area)
subclassification is asupplemental classification that is defined as land within 0.5 mile upstream and draining
to a river intake or within 0.5 mile and draining to the normal pool elevation of water supply reservoirs. No
waters classified as High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II) or Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW) occurs within one mile of the project study area.
The Basinwide Monitoring Program, managed by DWQ, is part of an ongoing ambient water quality
monitoring program that addresses long-term trends in water quality. The program monitors ambient water
quality by sampling at fixed sites for selected benthic macroinvertebrate organisms, which are sensitive to
water quality conditions. Samples are evaluated on the number of taxa present of intolerant groups
~Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera (EPT)] and a taxa richness (EPT S) is calculated. A biotic index
value is also calculated for the sample that summarizes tolerance data for all species in each collection. The
two rankings are given equal weight in final site classification. The biotic index and taxa richness values
primarily reflect the effects of chemical pollution and are a poor measure of the effects of such physical
pollutants as sediment. There are no benthic macroinvertebrate sampling stations in the project vicinity
(NCDENR, 1998).
Point source discharge is defined as "a discharge that enters surface waters through a pipe, ditch or any
other well-defined point of discharge. The term applies to wastewater and stormwater discharges from a
variety of sources" (DWQ, 1998). Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are
permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Any
dischargers are required to register for a permit. No registered point source dischargers are located in or
directly upstream from the project study area.
Non-point source discharge refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater, snowmelt, or
atmospheric deposition (DWQ, 1998). Many types of land-use activities serve as sources of non-point
source pollution. These include land development, construction, crop production, animal feeding lots,
failing septic systems, landfills, roads, and parking lots. Sediment and nutrients are major pollution-
causing substances associated with non-point source pollution. Other sources of pollution include fecal
coliform bacteria, heavy metals, oil and grease, and any other substance that may be washed off the
ground or removed from the atmosphere and carried into surface waters. Excluding road runoff, there
were no identifiable non-point sources observed during the site visit.
3. Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
a. GeneralImpacts
Impacts to water resources in the project area are likely to result from activities associated with project
construction, such as clearing and grubbing on streambanks, riparian canopy removal, instream
construction, fertilizers and pesticides in revegetation, and pavement installation.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 6

In order to minimize potential impacts to water resources in the project area, NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly enforced during the construction phase of the
project. Impacts can be further reduced by limiting instream' activities and revegetatin~ stream banks
immediately following the completion of grading.
b. Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
In order to protect the water quality and aquatic life in the area affected by this project, the NCDOT and all
potential contractors should follow appropriate guidelines for bridge demolition and removal. These
guidelines are presented in NCDOT°s document Best Management Practices for Construction and
Maintenance Activities (2003).
Bridge No. 416 is composed completely of timber and steel; therefore, it will be removed without dropping
any components into waters of the United States.
D. Biotic Resources
1. Plant Communities
Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications. These
classifications follow Schafale and Weakley (1990) where possible. Representative animal species that are
likely to occur in these habitats (based on published range distributions) are also cited.
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are provided for each animal and plant
species described. Subsequent references to the same organism refer to the common name only.
Much of the flora and fauna described within biotic communities utilize resources from adjacent
communities, making boundaries between contiguous communities difficult to define. There are four
terrestrial communities located in the project area: disturbed maintained, upland forest, lake fringe/floodplain
forest, and wetland.
a. Disturbed/Maintained Community
This community is located on the north and south side of the bridge and encompasses two types of habitat:
maintained road shoulder and less maintained disturbed community. The maintained road shoulder
community consists mostly of grasses, herbs, and vines including fescue (Festuca spp.), goldenrod (Solidago
spp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), cinquefoil
(Potentilla canadensis), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), wild grape (Vitis spp.), Virginia creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and cross-vine (Bignonia capreolata).
The less maintained disturbed community is located on the north side of SR 2550 and along the powerline
clearing. It is comprised of shrubs and trees including sweet gum (Liquidambar sh'raciflua), short-leaf pine
(Pines echinata), white oak (Quercus alba), willow oak (Quercus phellos), northern red oak (Quercus
rubra), shagbark hickory (Carva ovata), red maple (Acer rubrurn), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
black gum (Nyssa s~~/vatica), hornbeam (Carninus caroliniana), blackberry (Rubes spp.) and winged sumac
(R/2us copallina). Herbs, grasses, and vines are similar to the road shoulder community and also include
foxtail grass (Setaria spp.), broomsedge (Andropogon spp.), coneflower (Rudbeckia spp.), sunflowers
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 7

(Helianthus spp.), wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.), ragweed (A»cbrosia artec»issifolia), rabbit tobacco
(G»apha/icccn obtusifolic»»), butterfly pea (Centrosema >>irgi»ia»c.r»~), and green-brier (Sncilax spp.).
b. Lake Fringe/Floodplain Forest
Dominant emergent species within the permanently to seasonally flooded areas primarily along the east
bank include water willow (J»sticia an~erica»a) and spikerush (Eleocllaris spp.). Species within the
seasonally flooded to saturated areas include buttonbush (Ceplcalanthus occidentalis), black willow
(Salix »igra), rose mallow (Hibiscus ncoscheutos), arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia), golden club
(Orontiunc ageraticun~), sedges, cardinal flower (L.abelia cardi»alis), river oats (Clcasmarctlliu»z
latifolium), silky dogwood (Concus ac»oc»cn»), tag alder (Alms serrulata), hornbeam, overcup oak
(Quercus h•rata), sweetgum, green ash (Fraxi»us pen»s~•Iva»ica), and willow oak. Species along the
steeper banks (primarily west bank) consist of sycamore (Plata»us occide»talis), American elm (Ulnzcrs
amc>>•ica»a), tag alder, silky dogwood, microstegium (Micros7egium rimineum), and sedges. The vine
community is similar, to the Disturbed/Maintained community.
c. Upland Forest
The upland forest community is located upslope of the lake fringe/floodplain forest community. This
community includes species found in the disturbed communities mentioned above such as white oak,
hickories, northern red oak, red maple, southern sugar maple (Acer barbatu»c), short-leaf pine, tulip poplar,
black gum, and red cedar (Jucciperus rir~inia»a). Understory and shrub species include hornbeam, American
holly (Ilex opaca), flowering dogwood (Cor»us Florida), sourwood (O.r~•dendreun arboreu»c), sassafras
(Sassafras albidum), witch hazel (Hm»amelis i~irginiana), and blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Herbaceous and
vine species consist of heartleaf (Hexasn~lis spp.), pipsissiwa (Chic»aphila r»aculata), tick-trefoils
(Desmodium spp.), poison ivy, trumpet creeper,virginia creeper, green-brier, wild grape, honeysuckle, and
cross-vine. The upland forest community corresponds to the Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest as described in
Schafale and Weakley (1990).
d. Wetland Community
Wetlands are located within the Lake Fringe/Floodplain Forest community along the east bank of
Beaverdam Creek. The wetland vegetation is described in the community description for Lake
Fringe/Floodplain Forest.
2. Wildlife
Maintained/disturbed communities adjacent to forested tracts provide rich ecotones for foraging, while the
forests provide forage and cover. Common mammals and birds associated with ecotones and upland forests
are least shrew (Cryptotis pan~a), southern short-tailed shrew (Blari»a carolinensis), hispid cottonrat
(Sigmodon hispidus), eastern cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), gray squirrel
(Sciacrus carolinensis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Virginia opossum (Di~delphis virginiana),
Northern mockingbird (Micnus polyglottos), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), European starling
(Stur»us vulgaris), Carolina chickadee (Poecile caroli»e»sis), tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), and
common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula).
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 8

3. Aquatic Communities
This community consists of Beaverdam Creek, a major arm of Badin Lake. The community is lacustrine,
supporting a variety of insects including water striders (Gerris spp.), whirligigs (Dineun~s spp.), caddisflies,
mayflies, midges, dragonflies, and damselflies. Mussels (E/lrptio spp.) and clams (Corbicula,flwninea)tyere
also observed. This community supports a variety of reptiles including snakes and turtles, amphibians such as
frogs and salamanders, and fish. Birds associated with this community include belted kingfisher (Megacei-~~le
alcyon), great blue heron (Ardea herodias), and a variety of ducks. Plants found in this community are
mentioned in the Lake Fringe/Floodplain Forest community description.
4. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
a. Terrestrial Communities
Impacts to terrestrial communities will result from project construction due to the clearing and paving of
portions of the project area, and thus the loss of community area. Table 2 depicts impacts to terrestrial biotic
communities that have been estimated based on the approximate construction limits of the two alternatives.
Table 2. Anticipated Terrestrial Impacts
Alternative B
Alternative D
(preferred)
Vegetative Community permanent
Permanent Temporary
Tem orar
O.OOacre 1.20 acres
Upland Forest 0.20 acre 0.00 acre
0.68 acre 0.88 acre
Disturbed/Maintained 0.00 acre 0.00 acre
0.04 acre 0.12 acre
Lake Fringe/Floodplain Forest 0.03 acre 0.00 acre
b. Aquatic Communities
Impacts to the aquatic community of Beaverdam Creek will result from the replacement of Bridge No. 416.
Impacts are likely to result from the physical disturbance of aquatic habitats (i.e. substrate and water quality).
Disturbance of aquatic habitats has a detrimental effect on aquatic community composition by reducing
species diversity and the overall quality of aquatic habitats. Impacts to aquatic communities will be
minimized by strict adherence to BMPs.
c. Wetland Communities
Impacts to wetlands will take place depending on the final design of the bridge replacement. Table 3
depicts the estimated impacts to Waters of the U.S. for the proposed alternatives. Permanent wetland
impacts are a result of the widening of the approach roadway to the proposed new permanent bridge.
Temporary wetland impacts are a result of the temporary road leading to the temporary bridge.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 9

Table 3. Potential Impacts to Waters of the U.S. (acre)
Proposed Wetland Wetland Total
Alternatives (permanent) (temporary) Impact
Alternative B

( referred) 0.029 acre 0.017 acre 0.046 acre
Alternative D 0.086 acre 0.000 acre 0.086 acre
E. Special Topics
1. Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of waters of the United States, as defined in
Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CFR) Part 328.3. Any action that proposes to dredge or place fill
material into surface waters or wetlands falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Surface waters include all standing or
flowing waters which have commercial or recreational value to the public.
Criteria to delineate jurisdictional wetlands include evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation and
hydrology. There are wetlands in the project area in the form of a lake emergent community and bottomland
hardwood community along the east bank. According to Cowardin's classification the lake emergent
community is part of the L1UBHh (Lacustrine, limnetic, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded,
impounded) community. The bottomland hardwood community shoreward of the emergent community is a
PFO1C wetland type (palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded) (Cowardin et al,
1979). Estimated wetland impact for Alternative B (preferred) is 0.046 acre and for Alternative D is 0.086
acre.
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are calculated based on the linear feet of the stream located within
the proposed right-of-way. An anticipated combined length of 75 feet of Beaverdam Creek and 54 feet of
streambed may be permanently or temporarily impacted by the proposed bridge replacement.
2. Permits
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act - In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344), a permit is required from the USACE for projects of this type for the discharge of dredged
or fill material into "Waters of the United States." The USACE issues two types of permits for these
activities. A general permit may be issued on a nationwide or regional basis for a category or categories
of activities when: those activities are substantially similar in nature and cause only a minimal individual
or cumulative environmental impacts, or when the general permit would result in avoiding unnecessary
duplication or regulatory control exercised by another Federal, state or local agency provided that the
environmental consequences of the action are individually and cumulatively minimal. If a general permit
is not appropriate for a particular activity, then an individual permit must be utilized. Individual permits
are authorized on a case-by-case evaluation of a specific project involving the proposed discharges.
It is anticipated that this project will fall under Nationwide Permit 23, which is a type of general permit.
Nationwide Permit 23 is relevant to approved Categorical Exclusions. This permit authorizes any
activities, work and discharges undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed, in whole
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 10

or in part, by another federal agency and that the activity is "categorically excluded" from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions which neither individually nor
cumulatively have a significant effect on the environment. Activities authorized under nationwide
permits must satisfy all terms and conditions of the particular permit. However, final permit decisions
are left to the discretionary authority of the USACE.
Section 401 General Water Quality Certification (WQC) - A Section 401 General Water Quality
Certification is necessary for projects that require Section 404 permits. The state has General
Certifications which will match the permit type authorized by the USACE. The NCDWQ must issue the
401 Certification before the USACE will issue the 404 Permit.
Bridge Demolition and Removal -Bridge No. 416 is composed completely of timber and steel; therefore, it
will be removed without dropping any components into waters of the United States. Bridge No. 416 is
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and will be disassembled and moved to a
storage area as designated by NCDOT.
Yadkin's Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures
(Procedures) govern activities within a project, such as the proposed bridge replacement. Bridge No. 416 is
not located within a conservation zone or in an area of sensitive habitat. For bridge replacements not
impacting a conservation zone, Yadkin's permitting process requires the completion of Yadkin's Agency
Consultation (AC) process before Yadkin can issue a Construction Permit for the proposed improvements.
3. Mitigation
Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the Council on Environmental Quality to include
avoidance, minimization, and compensation. These activities must be considered in sequential order.
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to Waters of the
U.S. Bridge No. 96 is structurally deficient and obsolete; avoiding replacement of the bridge is not a
feasible option.
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce adverse impacts to
Waters of the U.S. Alternative B (preferred) minimizes impacts because it replaces the bridge in place
and uses one lane on-site detour during construction.
Compensatory mitigation is required for those projects authorized under Nationwide Permits that result in the
fill or alteration of:
• More than 1.0 acres of wetlands.
• And/or more than I50 feet of streams.
It is the decision of the USACE and the NCDWQ to require mitigation for impacts associated with
project construction. The USACE and the NCDWQ has the discretion to require compensatory
mitigation for any impacts to Waters of the United States.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 11

F. Rare and Protected Species
Federal Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and tlora are in the process of decline either due to natural forces or their inability
to coexist with human development. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally
protected, be subject to review by the USFWS. Other species may receive additional protection under
separate state laws. This project occurs wholly in Davidson County, but since Montgomery County is a short
distance from the project and presents similar physiography to that of Davidson County, listed species for
Montgomery County were also investigated.
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered
(PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section _7 and Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS lists six federally protected species for Davidson
and Montgomery Counties (list last updated February 2003, checked via Internet 12/2/05). These species are
listed in Table 4. Brief descriptions of the characteristics and habitat requirements follow.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species Potentially Occurring in Davidson and Montgomery
Counties, NC
Scientific Name Common Federal Status Habitat Biological
Name Present Conclusion
~Clemm~'s rnuhlenbei~~ii Bog turtle' Threatened N/A Not Required
(S/A)
Haliaeetus leta'ocephalus Bald eagle'' Z Threatened-PD Yes May Affect -Not
• Likely to Adversely
Affect
Helianthus schn~ei~lit;,ii Schweinitz's Endangered No No Effect
sunflower'' Z
Felis concolor Eastern cougarZ Endangered No No Effect
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded Endangered No No Effect
wood eckerz
EclTinacea laevigata Smooth Endangered No No Effect
coneflower2
Note:
• "Endangered" denotes a species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
• "Threatened" denotes a species likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
• "PD" denotes a species that is proposed for delisting.
• "T(S/A)" denotes a species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species
are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
Listed for Davidson County
ZListed for Montgomery County
A review of the NCNHP maps on April 25, 2005 indicated that no protected species are known to occur
within one mile of the project study area.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 12

Haliaeetirs leucoceplza/l+s (Bald eagle)
Animal Family: Accipitridae
Federal Listed: March 11, 1967
The bald eagle is a large raptor. The characteristic adult plumage consists of a white head and tail with a
dark brown body. Juvenile eagles are completely dark brown and do not fully develop the majestic white
head and tail until the fifth or sixth year. Fish are the primary food source but bald eagles will also take a
variety of birds, mammals, and turtles (both live and as carrion) when fish are not readily available. Adults
average about three feet from head to tail, weigh approximately 10 to 12 pounds and have a wingspread that
can reach seven feet. Generally, female bald eagles are somewhat larger than males.
Breeding pairs of bald eagles unite for life or until the death of their mate. The breeding season varies
throughout the U.S., but typically begins in the winter for the southern populations and progressively shifts
toward spring the farther north the populations occur. The typical nest is constructed of large sticks and lined
with soft materials such as pine needles and grasses. The nests are very large, measuring up to six feet across
and weighing hundreds of pounds. Many nests are believed to be used by the same pair of eagles year after
year. Female eagles lay an average of two eggs; however, the clutch size may vary from one to three eggs.
The eggs are incubated about 35 days. The young fledge 9 to 14 weeks after hatching and at approximately
four months are on their own.
The bald eagle has repopulated much of North Carolina over the past twenty years. In 1982, there were no
bald eagle nests in North Carolina; in 1998, there were 17 nests; and in 2000, there were 34 nests. The
recovery is due in part to habitat protection and management actions initiated under the Endangered Species
Act and to the reduction in levels of persistent organochlorine pesticides, such as DDT, occurring in the
environment. The bald eagle's recovery has led to a proposal for delisting the bald eagle from the Federal
Endangered/Threatened Species List.
The knowledge of bald eagle nesting activity in the vicinity of Badin Lake is summarized in a report prepared
by the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William and Mary in cooperation with Alcoa Power
Generating, Inc. In addition, the USFWS published a guideline for managing bald eagle habitat which
defines the critical distances from disturbances that could constitute "take" as defined in Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
The site of this bridge replacement project lies at the upper reaches of what could be considered the
Beaverdam Creek arm of Badin Lake. Although there are numerous residential home sites in very close
proximity to the bridge, there is ample habitat within one mile of the site that could attract nesting eagles.
The potential for nesting eagles in this area cannot be ruled out; however, the most recent data from the
multi-year eagle nest census conducted by researchers from William and Mary reveals that the closest eagle
nest is at least 4 miles from the bridge site (personal communication with Dana Bradshaw, project scientist).
Dr. Bryan D. Watts, Director of the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William and Mary,
confirmed on Apri14, 2005, that no eagle nesting activity has occurred near the project site as of their spring
2005 reconnaissance. NCDOT will query the researchers prior to project advertising. Information obtained
during this pre-construction interval must be communicated to the USFWS in Asheville to ensure that the
department has met its obligations under Section 7. Should additional nesting activity be reported at that
time, it will be necessary to continue consultation with the USFWS. Any discussions should also include the
NCWRC.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 13

Based upon these recommended safeguards, the USFWS has concurred with the May Affect, Not Likely to
Adversely Affect conclusion. USFWS and NCWRC were advised of the NCDOT's intention to proceed in
this manner. USFWS and NCWRC emailed their concun~ence with this approach (January 5, 2004,
Appendix B).
Clen~n~t•s r?tuhler7Uergii (Bog turtle)
Animal Family: Emydidae
Federal Listed: November 4, 1997
Bog turtles are small (3 to 4.5 inches) turtles with a weakly keeled carapace (upper shell] that ranges from
light brown to ebony in color. The species is readily distinguished from other turtles by a large, conspicuous
bright orange to yellow blotch on each side of its head. Bog turtles are semi-aquatic and are only
infrequently active above their muddy habitats during specific times of year and temperature ranges. They
can be found during the mating season from June to July and at other times from April to October when the
humidity is high, such as after a rain event, and temperatures are in the seventies. Bog turtle habitat consists
of bogs, swamps, marshy meadows, and other wet environments, specifically those that have soft muddy
bottoms. The southern populations of bog turtles (in Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, and
Georgia) are listed as threatened due to similar appearance (T S/A) to northern bog turtles that are listed as
threatened.
A Biological Conclusion is not required since T (S/A) species are not afforded full protection under the ESA.
However, the protected species classification of the southern populations could be upgraded in the future.
No potential habitat occurs within the area of potential impact. The NCNHP's maps of rare species and
unique habitats was checked on April 25, 2005. No populations of this species have been reported in the
project area. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact to this species.
Helianthus schw~einit~ii (Schweinitz's sunflower)
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federal Listed: May 7, 1991
Schweinitz's sunflower, usually 3 to 6 feet tall, is a perennial herb with one to several fuzzy purple stems
growing from a cluster of carrot-like tuberous roots. Leaves are 2 to 7 inches long, 0.4 to 0.8 inch wide,
lance-shaped, and usually opposite, with upper leaves alternate. Leaves feel like felt on the underside and are
rough like sandpaper on the upper surface. The edges of the leaves tend to curl under. Flowers are yellow
composites, and generally smaller than other sunflowers in North America. Flowering and fruiting occur
mid-September to frost. This plant grows in clearings and along the edges of upland woods, thickets and
pastures. It is also found along roadsides, powerline clearings, old pastures, and woodland openings. It
prefers full sunlight or partial shade, but is intolerant of full shade.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Potential habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower occurs along roadsides, power line rights-of-way, and field edges
throughout the project area. The project study area was evaluated for potential Schweinitz's sunflower
habitat and extensive field surveys were performed in September 2001. No populations were found within
the area of potential impact. The NCNHP's maps of rare species and unique habitats were checked on April
25, 2005. No populations of this species have been reported in the project area. Therefore, the proposed
project is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact to this species. Additional surveys were conducted in
May 2004 by M. Randall Turner; this field work confirmed that no representatives of the genus Heliantllus
occur in the project study area. The investigator is very familiar with the vegetative morphology of the genus
and is comfortable that the plant was not present in any of the potentially suitable habitat areas.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 14

Fe1is concolor cougar (Eastern cougar)
Animal Family: Felidae
Federal Listed: June 4, 1973
The eastern cougar is a large, unspotted, long-tailed cat. Its body and legs are a uniform fulvous or tawny
hue. Its belly is pale reddish or reddish white. No preference for specific habitat types has been noted. The
primary need is apparently for a large wilderness area with an adequate food supply. Male cougars of other
subspecies have been observed to occupy a range of 25 or more square miles, and females from 5 to 20
square miles. The eastern cougar is considered by many to be extirpated from North Carolina.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
As noted on the potential distribution map, the species is not believed to inhabit the geographic area that
includes Davidson and Montgomery Counties. If the species occurs at all in North Carolina, it is more likely
to be found in the extreme western and southeastern portions of the state. The principal reason for this is the
species' need for large, unbroken expanses of habitat. Encroaching development throughout much of the
state would preclude its survival primarily due to the ever-increasing likelihood of its encounters with man.
An April 25, 2005 review of NHP maps indicated that no protected species are known to occur within aone-
mile radius of the project site. This project will have "No Effect" on the eastern cougar.
Pit•oides borealis (Red-cockaded woodpecker)
Animal Family: Picidae
Federal Listed: October 13, 1970
The red-cockaded woodpecker is 7 to 8 inches long with a ~~-ing span of 14 to 15 inches. There are black and
white horizontal stripes on its back, and its cheeks and underparts are white. Its flanks are black streaked. The
cap and stripe on the side of the neck and the throat are black. The male has a small red spot on each side of the
black cap. After the first post fledgling molt, fledgling males have a red crown patch. 1~1ost often, the parent
birds and some of their male offspring from previous }ears form a family unit called a group. A group may
include one breeding pair and as mam' as seven other birds. Commonl}', these groups are comprised of three to
fire birds. This bird's range is closely tied to the distribution of southern pines.
Open stands of pine containing trees 60 years old and older are used for nesting/roosting habitat. Red-cockaded
woodpeckers need live, large older pines in which to excavate their cavities. Longleaf pines (Pi~iur pals~.rtri.r) are
most commonly used, but other species of southern pine are also acceptable. Dense stands (stands that are
primarily hardwoods, or that have a dense hardwood understori) are avoided. Foraging habitat is provided in
pine and pine hardwood stands 30 years old or older with foraging preference for pine trees 10 inches or larger in
diameter. Roosting cavities are excavated in living pines, and usually in those that are infected with a fungus
producing what is known as red-heart disease. Completed cavities in active use have numerous, small resin wells
which exude sap. The territory for a group averages about 200 acres, but observers have reported territories
running from a loin of around 60 acres to an upper extreme of more than 600 acres.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 15

BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
~ thorough examination of the project srud~~ area was conducted on l~1av 18, 2004. No pine dominated forest
stand «-ill be impacted b}' construction activities related to the bridge replacement. The project does not support
habitat that is suitable for the red-cockaded woodpecker. On ,~pril 25, 2005 review of NHP maps indicated that
no protected species are known to occur u-ithin a one-mile radius of the project site. Consequenth~, the project
«~ill have "No Effect" on the red-cockaded ~~-oodpecker.
Echiiiacea laevigata (Smooth coneflower)
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federal Listed: October 8, 1992
Smooth coneflower is a rhizomatous perennial herb that grows up to 5 feet tall from a vertical root stock.
The stems are smooth, with few leaves. The largest leaves are the basal leaves, which reach 8.0 inches in
length and 3 inches in width, have long stems, and are elliptical to broadly lanceolate, tapering to the base,
and smooth to slightly rough. Mid-stem leaves have shorter stems or no stems and are smaller in size than
the basal leaves. The rays of the flowers (petal-like structures) are light pink to purplish, usually drooping,
and 2 to 3 inches long. Flower heads are usually solitary. Flowering occurs from May through July.
The habitat of smooth coneflower is open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs,
and power line rights-of-way, usually on magnesium- and calcium-rich soils associated with gabbro and
diabase parent rock. Areas subject to periodic disturbances to reduce the shade and competition of woody
plants provide optimal habitat since these plants thrive in abundant sunlight with little competition in the
herbaceous layer.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
An April 25, 2005 review of NHP maps indicated that no protected species are known to occur within aone-
mile radius of the project site. A walking survey was conducted on May 18, 2004, by M. Randall Turner,
which is outside the optimum survey window of June to late July. The search focused on identification of the
vegetative portions of the plant since. its flowers may not emerge until later in June. The principal field
investigator has visited populations of this plant in Orange and Durham Counties over the years and is very
familiar with its habit and appearance. While open roadsides may in some cases provide potentially suitable
habitat, roadside areas in the project study area are heavily infested with thick ground covers or grasses and
other herbs and are not appropriate habitat. Most of these areas are under intense mowing regimes, a
condition often inimical to this species. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey
mapping indicates undisturbed areas surrounding the roadway fill material are mapped as the Oakboro silt
loam (frequently flooded) soil unit, which does not provide appropriate habitat. No evidence of smooth
coneflower exists at the project study area and the NHP has no record of known populations within aone-
mile radius of the bridge site. Therefore, this project will have "No Effect" on smooth coneflower.
2. Federal Species of Concern
There are thirteen federal species of concern listed by the USFWS for Davidson and Montgomery Counties
(Table 4). Federal species of concern (FSC) are not afforded federal protection under the Endangered
Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed
or listed as Threatened or Endangered. However, the status of these species is subject to change, and so
should be included for consideration. Federal Species of Concern are defined as species that are under
consideration for listing for which there is insufficient information to support listing. In addition, organisms
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 16

which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) list of Rare Plant and Animal Species are afforded state protection under the NC
State Endangered Species Act and the NC Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979.
Table 4 lists the FSC, the state status of these species (NCNHP list reviewed December 2, 2005, last updated
January 2004), and the potential for suitable habitat in the project area for each species. This species list is
provided for information purposes as the status of these species may be upgraded in the future.
Table 4. Federal Species of Concern for Davidson and Mont;Qomery Counties

Common Name
Scientific Name NC
Status Habitat
.Present
Carolina darter Etheostomn Collis Collis SC Yes
Northern ine snake Pituo phis melauoleucus n~elanoleucus SC No
Sandhills chub Semotilus lumhee SC Yes
Atlantic i toe Fusconaia r~~asoni E Yes
Brook floater Alasmidonta t~aricosa E Yes
Carolina creekshell Vi/losa vau haniana E No
Sandhills clubtail draQonfl Gore has an~idens Carolinas SC Yes
Savannah lilli ut Toxolasn~a ullus E Yes
Bo s icebush Lindera subcoriacea T No
Ravine sedge Carea irn re.cinerria ST-T Yes
Yadkin River Qoldenrod SolidaRo lumosa E No
Geor is aster (C1) Aster s;eor ianus°` T Yes
Heller's trefoil Lotus helleri SR-T No
Notes:
* This is a Federal lifted C t [axon, a [axon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support listing.
SC A Special Concern species is one which requires monitoring but may he taken or collected and sold under regulations adopted under the
provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 1 13 of the General Statutes (animals) and the Plant Protection and Conservation Act (plants). Only
propagated material may be sold of Special Concern plants that are also listed as Threatened or Endangered.
T A Threatened species is any native or once native species which is likely to become an Endangered species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range, or one that is designated as a threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species
Act.
SR A Significantly Rare species is not listed as "E." "T; ' or "SC," but exists in the state in small numbers and has been determined to need
monitoring.
-T Throughout -The species is rare throughout its range.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended, and implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance
Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account the
effect of their undertakings (federal funded, licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 17

B. Historic Architecture
A field survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) was conducted on May 17, 2002. All structures over 50
years of age within the APE were identified and recorded, and later reviewed by the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office (HPO). In a memo dated May 6. 2002 the State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) requested that Bridge No. 416 be evaluated. The bridge was evaluated by a qualified historian and
found to be eligible for listing on the National Register because it is among the oldest and most complete
structures of its type and design surviving in the state. A copy of the survey is included in Appendix A.
In accordance with Section 106 of the National Preservation Act, since the alternatives will have an adverse
effect on Bridge No. 416 by removing it, the HPO, NCDOT, and FHWA entered into a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) (Appendix A).
C. Archaeology
The SHPO, in a memorandum dated December 20, 2002 stated, "There are no known archaeological sites
within the proposed project area...it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for
conclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore,
recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project." A copy of the
SHPO memorandum is included in the Appendix.
VII. SECTION 4(F) RESOURCES
Bridge No. 416 was determined eligible for listing on the National Register under Criterion C for engineering
technology as one of only four Warren thru trusses functioning as swing-spans in North Carolina. The bridge
demonstrates the innovation associated with NCDOT's truss bridge reuse in the early 1950s.
Bridge No. 416 was built in 1920 and is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. It is
a one-lane facility with a clear roadway width of 15 feet (Figure 3). The pony truss bridge has one span at
72 feet in length. The superstructure consists of a timber deck on a low steel pony truss. The substructure
west end bent has timber caps, posts, and sills. The substructure of the east concrete abutment has timber
risers.
Since this project necessitates the use of a historic bridge and meets the criteria set forth in the Federal
Register (July 5, 1983), a programmatic Section 4(f) evaluation satisfies the requirements of Section 4(f).
The following alternatives, which avoid use of the historic bridge, have been fully evaluated: (1) do nothing;
(2) build a new structure at a different location without affecting the historic integrity of the structure, as
determined by procedures implementing the National Historic Preservation Act; and (3) rehabilitate the
historic bridge without affecting the historic integrity of the structure, as determined by procedures
implementing the National Historic Preservation Act. These alternatives were not found to be feasible and
prudent.
All possible planning to minimize harm to the historic bridge have been incorporated into this project.
Measures to minimize harm include:
1. Photo documentation
2. Reuse in new location
3. Advertisement
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 18

This project has been coordinated with the SHPO whose correspondence is included in Appendix A. Section
106 has been resolved and documented in the form of a MOA between FHWA, NCDOT, and HPO. The
SHPO concurs with the proposed mitigation.
Approval of the Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation by the Federal Highway Division Administrator is
included in Section XI of this document.
VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate bridge will result
in safer traffic operations.
The project is a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of substantial
environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural environment
with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No substantial change in
land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition will be limited. No
relocations of residents or businesses are expected with implementation of the proposed alternative.
In compliance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income Populations) a review was conducted to determine whether minority or low-
income populations were receiving disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
impacts as a result of this project. The investigation determined the project would not disproportionately
impact any minority or low-income populations.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated. The project is not expected to adversely
affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
There are no publicly owned recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl refuges of national, state, or
local significance in the vicinity of the project.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the
potential impacts to prime and important farmland soils by all land acquisition and construction projects.
Prime and important farmland soils are defined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The
proposed bridge will be replaced at the existing location. No impacts to prime or locally important farmland
are anticipated.
The project is located in Davidson County, which has been determined to be in compliance with the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Parts S 1 and 93 are not applicable, because the proposed project is
located in an attainment area. If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance
with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan for air quality in
compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 19

This project is an air quality "neutral'' project, so it is not required to be included in the regional emission
analysis (if applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not required. This project is not anticipated to
create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area.
The traffic volumes will not increase or decrease because of this project. There are no receptors located in
the immediate project area. Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary.
The project's impact on noise and air quality will not be substantial. This evaluation completes the
assessment requirements for highway traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and air quality (1990 CAAA and
NEPA) and no additional reports are required.
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality, Groundwater Section and the North Carolina Division of Solid Waste
Management revealed no hazardous waste sites in the project area. Afield reconnaissance survey was
conducted in the vicinity of the project. Based on the field reconnaissance survey there are no anticipated
impacts to Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). If any unregulated USTs or any potential source of
contamination is discovered during right-of-way initial contacts with impacted property owners, then an
assessment will be conducted to determine the extent of any contamination at that time.
Davidson County is currently participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. This crossing of
Beaverdam Creek is located in an approximate flood hazard zone. This project is not anticipated to have any
adverse impacts on the existing floodplain. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (Figure 6) shows the approximate
limits of the 100-.year flood plain in the vicinity of the project.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse environmental effects will
result from implementation of the project.
IX. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Efforts were undertaken early in the planning process to contact local officials to involve them in the project
development with scoping letters. Letters were also sent to various agencies. A newsletter was mailed in
November 2003 to state and local officials, and local residents notifying them of the selection of the
preferred alternative. No comments were received.
X. AGENCY COMMENTS
All agency comments have been addressed within the document. Letters from the commenting agencies
are included in Appendix B.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 20

XI. PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
THAT NECESSITATE THE USE OF HISTORIC BRIDGES
F. A. Project BRZ-2550(11
State Project 8.2604601 WBS No. 33459.1.1
T. I. P. No . B-4103
Description:
Bride No. 416 over Beaverdam Creek on SR 1550 (Badin Lake Road)
is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places
Yes No
1. Is the bridge to be replaced or rehabilitated with Federal Funds? X
2. Does the project require the use of a historic bridge structure
which is on or eligible for listing on the National Register of X
Historic Places?
3. Is the bridge a National Historic Landmark ? ~ X
4. Has agreement been reached among the FHWA, the State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) through procedures
pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation X_
Act (NHPA)?
ALTERNATNES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE AND
PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and found not to be feasible and prudent:
Yes No
1. Do nothine
Does the "do nothing" alternative:
a. correct the problem situation that caused the bridge to ~ X
be considered deficient?
b. pose serious and unacceptable safety hazards? X
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 1

?,
Build a new structure at a different location without affecting the
historic integrity of the structure.
a. The following reasons were reviewed:
(circle, as appropriate)
Yes No
X
(i) The present bridge has already been located at the only
feasible and prudent site
3
and/or (ii) Adverse social, environmental, or economic impacts were noted
and/or (iii) Cost and engineering difficulties reach extraordinary magnitude
and/or 'v) The existing bridge cannot be preserved due to the extent of
rehabilitation, because no responsible party will maintain
and preserve the historic bridge, or the permitting authority
requires removal or demolition.
Rehabilitate the historic bride without affecting the historic X
integrity of the structure.
a. The following reasons were reviewed:
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) The bridge is so structurally deficient that it cannot be
rehabilitated to meet the acceptable load requirements
and meet National Register criteria

and/or (ii) The bridge is seriously deficient geometrically and
cannot be widened to meet the required capacity and meet National
Register criteria
MINIMIZATION OF HARM
1. The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm.
2. Measures to minimize harm include the following:
(circle, as appropriate)
a. ~ For bridges that are to be rehabilitated, the historic
integrity of the bridge is preserved to the greatest extent
possible, consistent with unavoidable transportation
needs, safety, and load requirements.
b. For bridges that are to be rehabilitated to the point
that the historic integrity is affected or that are to
Yes No
X
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 2

be removed or demolished, the FHWA ensures that,
in accordance with the Historic American Engineering
Record (HAER) standards, or other suitable means
developed through consultation, fully adequate records
are made of the bridge.
cO. For bridges that are to be replaced, the existing bridge
is made available for an alternative use, provided a
responsible party agrees to maintain and preserve the
bridge.
O For bridges that are adversely affected, agreement
among the SHPO, ACHP, and FHWA is reached
through the Section 106 process of the NHPA on
measures to minimize harm and those measures
are incorporated into the project.
Specific measures to minimize harm are discussed below:
a. Prior to removal, NCDOT will record the bridge in accordance with the Memorandum of
Agreement Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan (Appendix A).
b. A proposed recipient is the City of Albemarle. The City has T-21 Enhancement funds
and plans to use the bridge as part of the second phase of a greenway project to span a
creek. No other groups have expressed an interest in the bridge, there fore the City has a
priority. A plan for relocation will be developed by all parties on the contact list which
will be subject to review and approval by NCDOT.
Contact Isist:
Potential Recipient: City of Albemarle
Lindsey Dunevant
Director, Albemarle Parks and Recreation Department
P.O. Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
]dunevant @ ci.albemarle.nc.us
Richard Silverman
NCDOT Historic Architecture
1583 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1583
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
rlsilverman @dot.state.nc.us
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 3

George L. Teague
Division 9 Bride Superintendent
515 Camp Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]
John Conforti
NCDOT Consultant Engineer
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
TEL: [phone] x263
FAX: [phone]
jconforti @dot.state.nc.us
Pam Williams
Consultant Engineer
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
P.O. Box 33127
Raleigh, NC 27636
TEL: [phone]
FAX: (9l 9) 851-1918
[e-mail]
Bob Smet
Natural Resources Specialist, Alcoa
P.O. Box 576
Badin, NC 28009-0576
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
robert.smet @ alcoa.com
c. If the City of Albemarle does not accept the bridge then the following will be
implemented:
i. The existing pony truss bridge will be disassembled and moved to a storage area
as designated by NCDOT. The bridge will be stored for up to 2 years. If a new
recipient is not found, the bridge will be destroyed.
ii. The bridge will be advertise on the NCDOT Bridge Reuse website for a least two
years or until a new owner is identified and accepts the bridge in accordance
with NCDOT's Historic Bridge Relocation and Reuse Program.
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information prior to approval. Consult Nationwide
4(f) evaluation.
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 4

COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
a. State Historic Preservation Officer --~-
b. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation .~---
c. Local/State/Federal Agencies -~-
d. US Coast Guard NSA
(for bridges requiring bridge permits)
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on July 5, 1983.
All required alternatives have been evaluated acid the findings made are clearly applicable to this project.
There are no feasible and prudent alternatives to the replacement of the historic bridge. The project
includes all possible planning to minimize harn~, and there are assurances that the measures to minimize
harm will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed.
Approved:
12.22•
Date nvironmental M Bement Director,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
12~- 22-~~7 ,
Date k`' Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administrator
T.I.P. No. B-4103, Bridge No. 416, Davidson County
Page 5

.~
i~

i (~ ~
~\ __-____-_Dovldson_Counly_ \~ ____I
~_ ~` i -M~ptgomery Counfq - SR ns
~__
~~
~, -
~~ ~'1
~ UWHARRIE
i
NATIONAL
i FOREST
~ a~
,„
~~ -, `,, ~
_ ,
.~ ( _
_ - ,
_J~ _-- -
f Q
\ _ ~ n ~ ~~
-~____p as ( `
.,~ ,09 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~
g+~
-~ ~ ~ ~~c
~ '1 ~ j i
.~ ~I~
\~ ;~~ ~ \ - C it
v\ 4 , y1o
t
_ .,~ ~ _.~-- `ii -- Bridq~, ~o. 416 -~ I °

~
~ N
~

~~;/~

~ ~
1
(~~.. ~° ~ i ~I
~
~
~ - ~
f ~
i U ~ i i
i ~i
SR a5~a
~I
i
Badin Lake Rd SR 2550 i ~' ~ °~
q ~edin Lake R
~
~ ~~~\
1
~• f R 2550 ~

4 ?

--_ L
--------
- -
~-*
L °" ---------------,
----°---------
-1 _-
-
----°

-
-- ----
2 y
~, .~
\
1
,
R 1156
ios
~
SRr1161 j Blaine d
\/
laine RT

.~
/
,, ~ ~
i
~ L .a
`

- ~ wu
~~~ ~~, _ ~,
~ ~1 ~ain
~
,,
SR 11
53di~, ~3n~~ - lame .Rd. ~ ~s"~~ ~~

PROPOSED DETOUR ROUTE
~~~
~M~rWT ~1
9 ~
_+e_Yie' tm
.:~~
~,~ T~.
~~<
:~~
~r
ti.1.'
~:',
~~:,~~
.~.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
~~~~~ Project Development & Environmental Analysis
DAVIDSON COUNTY
BRIDGE N0. 416
ON SR 2550 (BADIN LAKE ROAD)
OVER BEAVERDAM CREEK
8-4103
FIGURE 1
``~
\u

Legend
Roads
`` Streams
water
Uwharrie Natiorel Forest
Courrty Boundary
e
~ ~ ~~
o Rye
m
'~~°~' 7 IL.:
.~
~ 'Cp^
A 4
~t~,, +F ~ ~~. J I t
tu. ti .. ~ Y f
~ ;. V 3.'! ~ ~ .~
ll ~
~ ' f~/ ~ ~ ~
f
~fiM
f:` ~
i1~ l~~r.
/~ '+~~ 1~
^j - ~ Y,~ ~
~;~ ~.. ~:~ q ,
;, ~'; _ `~
~'` f
.~~ ~' 4 }~
1 ~ 4'\:,; ~~ . ~~i 111
National Forest Boundary
B-41o3 Figwre No.
Bridge No. 416 On Badin Lake Road Over Beaver Dam Creek
Davidson Coun North Carolina
Prepared For. ~;~,~
' • ~ d~~ Feet
y~ 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000
`q,d~~

T.LP. No. B-4903, Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-2550(1), State Project No. 8.2604601
Davidson County, SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road). Bridge No. 416 Over Beaver Dam Creek
FIGURE 3
Side view of Bridge No. 416 View looking across Bridge No. 616

~~ ~ _~ ~
~_
0.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~_,
ua
ti
~ ':3 ~
C
1 a~
jjj
t -= e.
. ~. ~ ,,.
t ~. .~w
~ ~ ::
< :.. ~~ ~s
.~ r
., ,,
-x
:.
~~
k '
r `x a _
ti
'~..- ~ ~
•~
:.
,.
-- .
~' '~
~;
',
._
~; ~},
4 Y
~.u
~ - -~ ~ ~,
:.~. ..._
>. ~ f
v r .»
~ r ~.
a.. y_
~t w4 w'
_ y~~ c
~~ ~ s ~ ~
„ -~ ~.
_~,
<.
_~
.. =i~
R
r r
~S
~. T
< ~~ ~'
e
„ .. •n'~ `„ ~k!`
~- 7y~
.~
e
w;
+~,~
.~,

;,,,~-
~ . ~ ,~ ~~.
~ -.~~`'"
~ a ~~ ~ ~: _ ~ ~ t,
c ~ 3.s.a ~ A. _
s ~ q ~' r5 e
E ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~e-
,. ~ ~ ~ t3 C) _.
~ ~ ~~
L___~ ~ ~ ,z~i+ ~ ~si.
~~ ~ ~ s
~, ~~~
a
~a~,
"Y e ~ .~ Yyi:~' ~ ~~
<~.
..
~~
~~_.
~."
-~~ ~~
c
~ _
~''s
o ~ `~'
~. ~ ~ ~.`~ a~,~.~°~. fir:-'~~k ,;.'
yam.' ~r .; :.r ~ '.
a ,
1 ~ ~ 4 ~ .. .,.. ~ ' -,. - ~~
- ~. ;~ x. 7
`~ ~` - , -
y 7
'.- ' rr - ~ ~ I~ „fir'' 4 ~~ b va
~ • r.
~~.~ .».
.1^+f `Y - ~ .~1 ~ Mho .ymow,, •'
T~ ~ ~t'~ ~
R
si
.~'' ~ 'Ei
~ r
,....e ' ^ '~F .. ~ ..
<, ~, ,
re
4 ~ ~~ ~
a: ~
~.
~ ter; : >

f
d
~ o
r
~ ' o u ~~a
C
w Et ° E
~ 9
~ ~~YLL
O DC ~ O l
N ` ~ c t C
d ga~~20
w ~'O C$ o
E n
Q sq:~~
U ~E$o$
w 5~ E Eu.
o~
a ~ ~ ~~~w
o goi ~~
a ~ wr4~Y
Q `o~Eg~
~LL t ~ O
O OI U
5 ~ £ n
~~ E
O O E o LL
N o«c$E
0 m m a CQ
0 C F e
~~o~a
~ ~
v
~ QPQ~ ~ ~
a
°~' o
~ X
. W Z '
0.i Q
~ Cz,
O ~ N
O w O ~ N
F- ~
H
Z
cn ~ z O PoPO
~ ,~
Q w ~ °~ w
> r
~ ~ w° ~a
a ~
z ~Z
~ Q ~
O
m
Fork S
aS~ ~ ~
~ U ~'
~,
~ Q w a GP~~~
~ W
a ~ N t'~Pa~s
~ Q~~E
r
~°t~ o
ti U
y ALIs a
0
ROAD h '~
C w
= yl ~ Eb3~ W p ~ O u

~O
G
~ ~/1
W
a
n

~ g= COO
~ '~ O
~~S Z~ t O
p N
W ^ m
C
u

w
?
~
z z Q
i
1 w
~ E e p
F
~ CWO 9
m
p
~ F ~ (g
~ c~ ~ ^
Z
~ 0 ~
~
~ a
~ i `~+~
FE~ ~
H q
o
o = ~.
zU~ ~
.~ x
o ~
~~ m
d
z x
~o O
A ~' z
~ $
~~ B
~~~
w
o
z O
~i ~' 6 O Q
A z a =~
o~. ~ ar~~~
SI8 ~ °~a~
~~~
'~ v
w

W
(~
V

APPENDIX A
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

~~ 11i05.~2004 15:08 NC DOT PDEA ~ 98511918 Nu.~yy Wes
Y '
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL ffiGH'VirA'SC ADMINYSTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA STATE ~Y)(STORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
FOR
TIP No. B-4103
REFLACE BRIDGE N0.416 OVER BEAVER DAM CREEK
DA'V~SOl~ COUNTY, NC
VVT~EREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has determined that the
replacement of Bridge No. 416 aver Beaver Dam Creek on SR 2550 (Badim Lake Road)
in Davidson County, North Carolina {the undertaking,) will have an effect upon Bridge
No. 41b, a property determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places, and has consulted with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR Part $00, regulations implementing Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4701); and
WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Trausportatian {NCDOT) and Alcoa
Power Generating, Inc. participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in
Wis Memorandum of Agreement;
NOW, 'Y')(IEREFORE, FHWA and the North Carolina SHPG agree that the undertaking
shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into
account the effect of the undertaking on the historic property.
STIPULA7TONS
FH'W'A will ensure that the following measures are carried out;
1. Bridge No• 416
A. Recordation: Prior to the removal and relocation of Bridge No. 416, NCDOT
shall record the existing condition of the bridge and its surroundings in
accordance with the attached Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation
Plan [Appendix Aj.
8. Relocation and Reuse: Bridge No. 416 will not be demolished. Instead, the
bridge will be relocated through the NCDOT Bridge Relocation and Reuse
Program. NCDOT's 1988 agreement with the North Carolina Historic
Preservation Office (HPO) and the Federal Highway Administration {FHWA)
affords the opportunity for the relocation and reuse of historic truss bridges.
Bridge No. 416 has been identified as an excellent candidate for this program.

11i05i2004 15:08 NC DOT PDEA ~ 98511918 N0.299 D04
lY. Dispute Resolution: Should the North Carolina SHPO object within (30) days to
any plans or documentation provided for review pursuant to this agreement,
FVV'l~A sha11 consult with the North Carolina SHPO to resolve the objection. If
FHWA or the North Carolina SHP4 determines that the objection cannot be
resolved, FHWA shall forward all documentation relevant to the dispute to the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Council). Within thirty (30) days
after receipt of all pertinent documentation, the Council will either:
A. Provide FI-iWA with reconunendations which FHWA will take into account in
reaching a final decision regarding the dispute, or
H. Notify Fr1WA that it will comment pursuant to 3G CFR Section 800.7(c} and
proceed to comment. Any Council comment provided in response to such a
request will be taken into account by FHWA in accordance with 3b CFR. Section
800.7 (c) (4) with reference to the subject of the dispute.
Any recommendation or comment provided by the Council will be understood to pertain
only Oo the subject ofthe dispute; FHWA's responsilnlity to carry out all the actions
under this agreement that are not the subject of the dispute wYll remain unchanged.
Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by FHWA and the North Carolina SHPO,
its subsequent filing with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and
implementation of its terms evidence that F~Y'U~A has afforded the Council an opportunity
to continent on the Replacement of Bridge No. d 16 Aver Heaver Dam Creek, Davidson
County, North Carolina and its effects on Bridge No. 4] b, and that FHWA has taken into
account the effects of the undertaking on the historic bridge.
2

'~ 11i05.~2004 15:08 NC DOT PDEA -~ 98511918
AGREE:
NU. ~'jy Wb~
FEDETtA~. ~iIGHVVA'Y' A.DMYNI TRATION DATE
~8 11
NORTH CAROLW TOR1C PRESERVATION O~'FTCER ATE
CONCUR:
9' ~
NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR OF TKANSPQRTATION DATE
d V~ 5 ~ ~ ~-- ~ 20 ~~
AL OA POWER CrENERATIIVG, INS. DATE
FIY,ED BY:
ADVISORY CQUNCP~. ON T~TS7URIC I'RES£RVATION
DATE
3

11105+'2004 15:08 NC DOT PDEA -~ 98511918 N0.299 f~bb
APPE1~bTX A
Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
For Bridge No. 416 over Beaver Dam Creek
Davidson County, North Caralitaa
T1P No. $-41Q3, WBS# 33aS9.1.1
State Project No. 8.26046U1
Federal Aid No. >3R.Z-2550(1)
Pbotogxaphic Requirements
• Overall views of the pmject area, showing the relationship of the bridge to setting
• Overall views ofthe bridge (elevations and oblique views)
t Selected photographic views of the bridge, including details of the connections
and bridge plate (if present)
• Views under the bridge - as accessible
Pbotograpbic Format
• Calar slides (all views)
• 35 mm or larger black and white negatives (all views)
• Two (2) sets of black and white contact sheets (all views)
• All processing to be done to archival standards
• All photographs and negatives to be labeled according to Division of Archives
and History standards
Copies and Curation
One (1) set of all photographic documentation will be deposited with the North
Carolina Division of Archives a»d HistorylState Historic Preservation Office to be
made a permanent part of the statewide survey and iconographic caUection. One
comact sheet shall be deposited in the files of the Historic Architecture Section of
NCDOT.
4

• 11/05/2004
15:08 NC DoT PDEA ~ 98511918
U.S. QEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
t or Tay, Federdt Highway Admtnlst-atton
~~ 9; 310 New Be-n Avenue, Sulks 410
Q Raleigh, NC 27601
C]ctober 19, 2004
~~ ~~~`
+r~rea of
Mr. Don Klima, Director
C)ffice of Planning and Review
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
The Qld Post QfFce Building
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. No. 809
Washington, Q.C. 20U04
NU.G77
to ~)Nn^C
IN REW.Y AEP2Q TO:
HDA NC
Subject: Memorandum of Agreement, for the replacement of Bridge No. d16
an SR 2250 (8adin take Road) over Beaver Dam Creek, Davidson
County, North Carolina, Federal-aid Project No. BRZ 2550(1), TIP
No. B-4103, State Project No. 8.2604501.
Dear Mr. Klima:
As required by 36 CFR 800.8(b)(iv) and previous correspondence between our
offices, we are filing the Memorandum of Agreement (MQA} that was developed
in consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer foc the
subject project. It is our understanding that the filing. of this MOA with the Qouncil
completes our compliance responsibilities under Section 106 of the Na#ional
Historic Preservation Act. Questions concerning this submittal may be directed
to Felix Davila of this office at [phone], extension 106.
Sincerely yours,
~~ ~~
Far John F. Sullivan, III, P.E.
Division Administrator
Enclosure
cc: Stacey Harris, NCDO7, PDEA
Renee Gledhill-Earley, NCSHPO
Mary Pope Furr, NCt~4T
Vk'JG

APPENDIX B
CORRESPONDENCE

~~".,..'^~ United States Forest National forests in North Carolina 160A 7rllicoa Strcet
~~~ Department of Service Supervisor's Office P.O. Boa 2750
Agriculture Asheville, NC 28802
828-257-4200
File Code: 2730-2
Date: May 8, 2003
Mr. Randall Turner
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Turner:
We have reviewed the information you submitted on Apri128 for the Forest Service to prepare a
cost proposal for completing a Biological Evaluation on replacing Bridge No. 416 on SR 2550
over Beaverdam Creek in Davidson County (TII' No. B-4103). This bridge and proposed detour
routes, on the plans you submitted, are all located on private land. However if the detour routes
change and are proposed for north of the existing bridge, National Forest system lands could
possibly be impacted and we would need to be involved in the project. If you have any questions
please call Ray Johns at 828-259-4859.
Sincerely,
Nee.s~,
A. NOEL
MAR
Recreation, Lands and SYVP Staff Officer
cc: Tom Horner, Uwharrie Ranger District
Caring for the Land and Serving People Prinoea on Recycled Paper

07i1~,i2003 12:56 NC DOT PDEA ~ 98511918 N0.299 D02
r P
~~
t p
e9
cw~+
United States Department of the Interior
FT51"I AND WILDI.1~ SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 7rllicoa Street
Asheville, Noah Carolina 28801
Juiy 11, 2003
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1588 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Deaz Mr. Thorpe:
JAL ! 6 20Q3
Sub}ect: Endangered Species Concurrence for Three Bridge Replacements in North
Carolina--B-4103, Bridge No. 416 on SR 2554 over Beaver Dam Creek, Davidson
County; B-4255, Bridge No. 28 on NC $Ul aver Withrow Creek, Ro~tvan County; and
B-4282, Bridge No. 54 on NC 6b over ]'inch Gut Creek, Stokes County
As requested by Mulkey Inc., engineers and ca~sultants for the North Carolina bepartment of
Transportation, we have reviewed the natural resources information and biological conclusions
for federally protected species for the subject projects. We provide the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 CJ.5.C.1531-1543) (Act), and the Fish and Vdildlife Coordination Act, as amended
{16 U.S.C. 6b1-b67e).
.8-4103 (dog Ntrnd-bcr 4-2-03 332)
According to the information provided, three federally listed species in Davidson County were
considered. These include the etidangered Sehweinitz's sunflower (Heltanthus schweiniraij~, the
threatened bald eagle {Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and the threatened. (due to similarity of
appearance) bog turtle (Clemmys rnuhlenbergii). The report considered these species and
concluded that there would be "no effect" on the bald eagle, Schweinitz's sunflower, or bog
turtle. Given the results of the field sur~'ey, we concur with the conclusion of "no effect" for the
Schweinitz's sunflower and bog turtle. In view of this, we believe the requirements under
seciian 7{c) of the Act are fulfilled regarding this species. I~owever, obligations under section 7
of the Act must be reconsidered if: {1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect .listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, {2) this

07i16i2003 1.2:56 NC DOT PDEA ~ 98511918 N0.299 .D03
i
I
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that maybe affected by the identified action.
Regarding impacts to the bald eagle, this project is located very neaz Badin Lake, which provides
suitable habitat for eagles. Surveys for bald eagles in the vicinity of this project were last
conducted in 2001. $ecause it has been two years since these surveys and because there has been
an increase in eagle activity in this part of the Yadkin River basin, we believe it would be prudent
to resurvey for eagles prior to beginning work on this project. Therefore, at this time we cannot
concur with a conclusion of `ho effect" for this species. We recommend resurveying for the bald
eagle, coordinating with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and Alcoa Power
Company with regard to the latest monitoring data they have collected for eagle nests and ~
foraging areas.
B-4255 (Log Number 4-2.03-333)
~~~
According to the information provided, two federally listed species ' Aavidson Co ty were
considered. These include the endangered Schweinitz's sunflower ( chweinitzii) and
the threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus~l. The report considered these species and
concluded that implementation ofthe subject project would be "not likely to adversely affect" the
bald eagle or Schweinitz's sunflower. Given the results of the field survey and the habitat
conditions iu the action area, we concur with the conclusion of "not likely to adversely affect" for
the Sehweinitz's sunflower and bald eagle. Yn view of this, we believe the requirements under
section 7(c) of'the Act are fulfilled regarding ttus species. However, obligations under section 7
of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
B-4Z82 (4og Number 4-Z-03-33a}
According to the information provided, three federally listed species in Stokes County were
considered. These include the endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitair~,
lames sgirtymussel (Pleurobema collirur), and small-anthered bittereress (Condamine . .
.. ,~ . ,,,~..~ifCy'Qnthertt). The report considered these species and concluded that this project would have
"no effect" an them.. Given the results of field surveys, we concur with the conclusion of "no
effect" for the Schweinitx's sunflower. >ri view of this, we believe the requirements under
section ?(c) of the Act are fulfilled regarding this species. However, obligations under section 7
of the Act must be reconsidered if (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
According to information provided, mussel surveys were conducted in Pinch Gut Creek from
250 feet above to SOQ feet below the project location. Pinch Gut Creek flows into Big Creek
approximately one-quarter of a mile downstream of the project area. Although the names

07i16i2003 12:56 NC DOT PDEA ~ 98511918 N0.299 D04
t
spinymussel has been found only in the main stem of the Dan River, other native fresh ,at~r
mussels have been found in Big Creak, Criven the difficulty of surveying for the Jame'-' ---
spinyrnussel and the relative lack of surveys in Big Creek, vre strongly recommend an additional
mussel surrey from the end of the previous survey downstream to Big Creels prior to project
cotjstructian. Sinularl th all-anthered bittercress, while not located in surveys conducted in
~_-002, sou d have relocated to the project site from an upstream location during recent high flows.
We also strongly recommend that a preconstruction survey (at the appropriate tune of year) be
conducted far this species. At this time we cantwt concur with a conclusion of "no effect" for the
James spinymussel or small-anthered bittereress and reconunend further surveys as described
above. ~
if you have questions about these comments, please contact Ms. Marella $uncick of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext. 237. Iri any future correspondence concerning these projects, please
reference the log numbers assigned with our comments about each of the thres~pro}eels.
S~in~cerely,
Brian 1', Cole
State Supervisor
cc:
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls
of the Neuse ]:toad, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27G 1 S
Ms.lvlarla J. Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator, North Carolina Wildlife 1esources
Commission, 12275 Swift Road, Qakboro, NC 28129
Ms. Cynthia'Uan Der Wiele, North Carolina Aepartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of '17Vater Quality, 'W'etlands Section, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
2?649-1621
.:,,ewMNiaw1~'~~' ...

Y r ,
i
'~ r From: [e-mail]
rl Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:07 PM
To: Randy Turner
Cc: [e-mail]; Pam Williams
Subject: Re: B-4103 (Montgomery/Davidson Counties) Re: bald eagle
Hi Randy,
Even though I'm not entirely sure where this is, I am comfortable with the Alcoa
survey and report data as a basis for eagle activity assessment in the High
Rock, Tillery, etc. chain. I still would suggest a look be given prior to
actual construction to make sure nobody has moved in to the neighborhood in the
meantime.
marella
marella buncick
USFWS
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
828-258-3939 ext 237
From: "Randy Turner" <[e-mail]
To: <Marella [e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
cc: "Pam Williams" <[e-mail]>
Subject: B-4103 (Montgomery/Davidson Counties) Re: bald eagle
Date: 01/02/04 02:08 PM
Marla, I took your suggestion to heart and contacted Yadkin, Inc. They sent me
their 2002 annual report. This report provides specific locations for the nest
sites on color maps and also color photography. They have also completed a 2003
survey and verbally stated that only 1 additional nest site was found, but it
was further from the subject bridge than the other nest sites.
I just completed a map mosaic, which depicts the known nest sites in relation to
the bridge location. The closest nest site is over 2 miles from the bridge on
SR 2550 (Beaverdam Creek).
Marella, If these data are acceptable to you, I plan on building a "May Affect,
Not Likely to Adversely Affect" conclusion based upon the findings of the
referenced report issued by Alcoa Power Generating, Inc/Center for Conservation
Biology, College of William and Mary. I don't want to reinvent the wheet. This
report appears to be comprehensive and the data based on good science. I will
of course provide a copy of the report and will exerpt germane information from
the report in my biological conclusion.
M. Randall Turner
Manager, Natural Resources Group
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC 27511
919-858-1795 ? direct
919-851-1918 ? fax
www.mulkeyinc.com
"Marking 10 Years of Engineering Success."

~ ~ ~ 1 v~ax~~~
•U.S. Department
of Transportation ',f•
~~ f
United States
Coast Guard
Commander
United States Coast Guard
Atlantic Area
431 Crawford Street LI
Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004 ~ •"- 7~0
Staff Symbol: (Aowb)
Phone: (757)39&6587
03 DEC 02 '~~ ~l ~' ~~
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
Dfr ~ ~ 2602
,;
L.,. pZ
.s
~,~~ r ~
•~~;~;L ~~A~{S
This is in response to yo~~r letter dated October 24, 2002 requesting the Coast Guard to review
the proposed projects to replace the following nine bridges: Black River Over Flow, Black
River, Jenny's Branch, Beaver Dam Creek, New River, Stone Creek, N.E. Cape Fear River,
Withrow Creek and Pinch Gut Creek all located throughout North Carolina.
The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 exempts bridge projects from Coast Guard bridge
permits when the bridge project crosses nontidal waters which are not used, susceptible to use in
their natural condition, or susceptible to use by reasonable improvement as a means to transport
interstate commerce. Such conditions for some of these waterways were confirmed in a
telephone conversation on November 27, 2002. Due to this, the bridge projects on Beaver Dam,
Withrow, and Pinch Gut Creeks and Black River Over Flow are exempt, and will not require
Coast Guard Bridge Permits.
Black River, Jenny's Branch, and Stone Creek are subject to tidal influence and thus considered
legally navigable for Bridge Administration purposes. But these waterways also meet the criteria
for advance approval waterways outlined in Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, Section
115.70. Advance approval waterways are those that aze navigable in law, but not actually
navigated by other than small boats. The Commandant of the Coast Guazd has given his advance
approval to the construction of bridges across such waterways; therefore, an individual permit
will not be required for these projects either.
Further information is required to assess the bridge replacement projects over the New River and
the North East Cape Fear River. Such information as, is the waterway affected by lunar tides? Is
there any commercial navigation? What types and sizes of boats operate on the waterway?
Bridge Permits may be required based on the answers to these questions. If a permit is required,
a higher level of environmental review will also be required.
The fact that Coast Guard permits are not required for some of these projects does not relieve
you of the responsibility far compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or

16590
03 DEC 02
local agency who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of the project. If you have any
questions, please contact Terrance Knowles at the phone number or address show above.
Sincerely,
i _
ANN B. DEATON
Chief, Bridge Administration Section
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
2

.•,~~Nt Or ~tii
` ~ ~ UNITED STATE3 DEPAFITMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic end Atmospheric Adminiatret{on
r
N4TIONAt MARINE rISH~RIES SERVICE
~',~~~~~'~ Habitat Conservation Division
101 Piver; Island koad
Beaufort, North Carolina ?~51(~-~>?~=
DCC 0 9 2QC2
December 6, 2UU~
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D.
Lnvironmental lt1anagement Director
Project Ucvclopment and
Environmental ~nalytiis Branch
NC Department of Transportation
1548 Nlail Se~'vicc Getter
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1 S~1R
Attention. John VVadswc~rth.. ['.E.
bear l~r Thorpe
'['he rational I~1arine Fisher;es Service (NnAA h~isheries) has reviewed your Uctolxr ~=t. ~t~U?_ letter
reduestinz comments on eight hridge replacement projects included in the Ne~nl~ Ci:ic~h~ta
Department of Transportation 200?_-2008 "transportation Iniprovcment Plan ~1'e undersl~u~ci tl~n
the rCDUT is prr:paring the planning and environmental studies ncccs~zry m process tlte,e i~ro~c•ct~.
as Categorical Exclusions and offers the following comments for your consideration
The environmental documents for these projects Should address rt~easur~s desi~,ned to a~ i)id atd
minimize loss of open ti~•ater and wetlands that support fishery resources In adJition_ ~~, r' suppclrt
findings contained in the Il9ay ~, 2002- letter from the Wilmington Ui~trict, U.S :~rnr~• (_ ~~r~~ of
End-ineers. which identified the ft~llowin, issues and concerns as being relevam ro the >i~rrrrc~~2d
bridge replacement projects
- Repl~tein~! bridges with culvcr-t~
- Permanent and temporary wetland losses
- Uffsite versus onsite detours
- Time of year restrictions on instream v~'ork
- Treatment irl'~a•etland restoration areas
- t~~citing bridge dentoiition and removal
- Lengthening e.yistin~, bridges as a Wetland restoration measure
Grc,up 1 -The iollo~•in~; projects u~ill have net impact on resources t~~r ~~~hii:h Nt~:1-~ Fiyhe- ii•~ ]~~~:
stewardship responsibility; therefore, v~•e have nn cotrnnents:
P~i~ued nn Recycled Pnper
,~ a..~o;,,r
:• _~
~r ~ • 9
E ~
3
r p
4~~
4iri P

Bridge Number
No. 4l6
No 28
No. 54
Project Number
B - 410,
B - 4255
B - 4282
County
Davidson County
Rowan County
Stokes County
Group 11- "fhcse projects have the potential to affect fishery resources and their associated habitat
for which N(.~.~ Fisheries has stewardship responsibility:
Bridge Number Project Number Count}'
N~. 12 B - 1382 Sampson County
No 26 B - 1382 Sampson County
No. 72 B - 403 ] Brunswick Cat,nty
Nc~ 24 B - 4214 Onslow County
No ? 1 B - 4223 Fender County
Bridges I2, 2G, 21 and 24 are located in the Cape Fear and New River besins anil in areas which
provide habitat fur anadromous fishery resources including American shad and river herring
fridges 72 and 24 are located in areas with brackish to saline water. that also support estuarine
dependent fishery resources such as spot, Atlantic croaker, and blue crab. In addition, these projects
may affect Cssential k'ish H~tbilli for Federally managed species such as red drum and sl~r•i,np
which-.are ma»aged by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, and summer flounder ~.~hicl,
is managed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. Accordingly, eve recommend that
an l~ssential Fish Habitat Assessment be included in any environmental document for tl~eae prc~je~tti
Spawning and nursery habitat #'or anadromous and estuarine fishes may be adversely impacted U~•
these projects unless measures to avoid and minimize impacts to waters and wetlands are included
in the project plans. Therefore, NOAH Fisheries may recommend against .Department of the Army
authorization of these projects under Nationwide Permit 23 unless the follow•in~ recam,nendatioi~s
are incorporated . .
1. following impact avoidance and minimization, unavoidable wetland losses shall be offset
throu~> in,ple,r,entation of'a compcnsatory,nitigation plan that has been approved by the Co~~p~
of Cngineers and in consultation with NnAA Fisheries.
2 .411 cemstiucaion activities in waters and associated wetlands shall utilize techniques that avoid
and mi,~imize adverse impacts to those systems and their associated flora and fa„na

AlthouYll the stated purpose of the project is to improve timber production. +~o inf~rmati~~Ti i~
provided regarding any ongoing silviculture operation: Furthermore, there is nn indication of
existence of'a forest management plan for the site which might indicate that the existing excavati~~n
and filling of tivettands is in compliance with the Clean Water Act (CWr'~), Sectie~n 401 (t)(I }{,.~1
exemptions for silviculture
NO~'1.A Fisheric5 concludes that the loss of wetlands at this site is highl~• detrime~ztal to
commercially, recreationally, and ecologically important fishery resources that utilize thi; New port
12iver Therefore, we recommend that Department ofthe Army authorization not he granted in this
case. 1•Ve ft~rther reeomrnend that if authorization is denied, the applicant should he required te;
restore pre-project elevations and contours and restore, through planting and other measures, all
impacted wetlands.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. Related questions or comments should
be directed to the attention of Mr. Ronald S Sechler at our Beaufort Office, 101 livers lslnnd Read,
Beaufort, North Carolina, or at [phone].
Sincerely.
i
Andreas Mager, Jr.
Assistant Regional Administrator
habitat Conservation Division

4
!! _ ~ i
~
. _~i
~ -` r, 'J
;
" ~ 1 Ill
~~t .
4.
~ J ~ ri .~L !
i '! ~f~
! i
t' ' _ i.~+~. '~
~ ~ _
F
- ... _. .1
~_... . s L
~.... .. ......
~~_~`~ North CarolinaWildlifeResources Commission '==
('harks R. l=ull~.~•u!ni, 4::zcruti~. r 11irr. tin
MEMORANDUM
TO: JohnWadsworth, P.E., Project Planning Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch. NCDOT
FROM: Marla Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator ~ ~ ~
/~ rL"Z~z C~a'rL~-~tia~
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: December 17, 2002
SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) request for comments on
Bridge Replacement Projects B-4103 (Davidson County), B-4255 (Rowan
County) and B-4282 (Stokes County).
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is requesting comments from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) on three bridge replacement projects.
Staff biologists have reviewed the information provided and have the following preliminary
comments. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
NCWRC has previously submitted scoping comments on these three bridge replacement
projects. The comments, dated May 8, 2002, are attached and remain appropriate; however, we
offer the following additional comments on the B-4103 project.
Bridge No. 416 on SR 2550 (Badin Lake Road) in Davidson County crosses over
Beaverdam Creek, at the headwaters of an arm of Badin Lake which is managed by Yadkin, Inc.
under a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) permit. NCDOT should coordinate
with Yadkin, Inc. to ensure compliance with their Shoreline Management Plan and Bald Eagle
Management Plan. Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) (Federal and State Threatened), are
found along Badin Lake and other lakes on the Yadkin/Pee Dee River system, both upstream and
downstream of the project area. The Beaverdam Creek/Grassy Fork Creek Significant Natural
Heritage Area is upstream of the project area, where a number of heartleaf plantain observations
Nlai'lin!~ AJdress:
hllltilUrl f)! !lll.ltl.~ ."Itih::r!_~: • ~, L I .\'i.:,l tit i pit <. ,'!?iii' ~ 1',ii~'1'!,h. ~i(. ~~It'i~)-!% ~!
7l'1C~hOnt'.: it ; c.) , ` i- i!; ~ C~:1 _t'; • i':1 `:. ! ~ t ~ ~' I ~ ~ 1- !t

B-4103, SR 2550 - 2 - December 17, 2002
Beaverdam Creek, Davidson Co.
have been made. Several other listed plant species, including the Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) (Federal and State Endangered) have been found in the azea. Surveys
should be conducted for all federal and state listed species. Also, the bridge cleazance above the
water should be sufficient to allow small boat or canoe passage underneath.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any
questions regarding these comments, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ
Marella Buncick, USFWS

1 t .r r'
~j
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, IJnit Head
Bridge Replacement & Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: Ron Linville, Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: May 8, 2002
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements:
Davidson County -Bridge No. 416, SR2550, Beaverdam Creek, B-4103
Rowan County -Bridge No. 28, NC801, Withrow Creek, B-4255
Stokes County -Bridge No. 54, NC66, Pinchgut Creek, B-4282
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.

Bridge Memo 2 May 8, 2002
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should he cleared but not grubbed. Cleazing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Cruidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In azeas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 1 S days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.

Bridge Memo 3 May 8, 2002
If corrugated metal pipe'arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silted barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. Davidson County -Bridge No. 416, SR2550, Beaverdam Creek, B-4103
YELLOW/RED LIGHT. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. Potential for
wetland and stream impacts at this location due to width of stream.

Bridge Memo 4 May 8, 2002
2. Rowan County -Bridge No. 28, NC801, Withrow Creek, B-425.5
GREEN LIGHT. No concerns indicated by biologists. Standard conditions should be
appropriate.
3. Stokes County -Bridge No. 54, NC66, Pinchgut Creek, B-4282
RED LIGHT. Class C-trout stream. Small mouth bass fishery will require moratorium
from May 1 -July 15 for instream activities. Listed species will need thorough review
(James River Spiny mussel, Hog Sucker, and Riverweed Darter, etc.). Dan River is a
WRC Priority Aquatic Conservation Area.
NCDOT should routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the
vicinity of bridge replacements. Restoring previously disturbed floodplain benches should
narrow and deepen streams previously widened and shallowed during initial bridge installation.
NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the
project and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams.
Replacement of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culverts, is recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks and reduce habitat fragmentation.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
Cc: David Cox, WRC

`oho, ~~~RQG
~ `
~ ~ r
-I
~ ~ `C
DEC 1 2 X002 ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. ""`-------------___ __
NCDOT, Project Development & Environmental Analysis
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator ~~
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December ',,~~~~y~~
rr
~'
r~ 4
~nrt I~
~~ ~O~C11'4=~~ ~z
.a ~ ~ ~;
7
~\~r~l~
SUBJECT: Scoping Comments for Bridge Replacement Pt-ojects: B-4103 Davidson Co., B-4255
Rowan Co., and B-4282 Stokes Co.
This letter is in response to your request for comments on ttre above-referenced projects.
The NC Division of Water Quality staff has the following recommendations:
1. B-4103 Bridge No. 416 over Beaver Dam Creek on SR 2550 in Davidson County
^ The bridge should be replaced with a bridge structure and designed as a single span with no piers in
the stream.
• Storm water management should be designed as a closed system. Storm water shall be designed to be
carried across the bridge (no deck drains over the stream) and diverted through grass-lined ditches,
vegetated buffers or directed to a storm water collection device prior to entering North Fork New
River.
^ Use Sedimentation and Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitil~e Watersheds [ 15A NCAC 4B .0124;
see http://ncrules.state.nc.us/ncadministrativ_/titlel5aenviron_/chapter04sedime. /default.htm) prior
to any ground-disturbing activities to nunimize impacts to downstream aquatic resources.
^ NCDOT must comply with water supply watershed buffer requirements.
^ Use BMPs for bridge demolition and removal, Case I (9-20-99 NCDOT policy; see
http://www.ncdot.orgJplanning/pe/bmp.pdf ).
2. B-4255 Bridge No. 28 over Withrow Creek on NC 801 in Rowan County
^ DWQ prefers that the bridge be replaced with a bridge, particularly if a Categorical Exclusion
document is being used (otherwise it should be processed as a FONSI under NEPA requirements).
^ Storm water should be directed to grass-lined ditches, vegetated buffers or other pre-treatment
method before entering the stream.
3. B-4282 Bridge No. 54 over Pinch Gut Creek on NC 66 in Stokes County
^ The bridge should be replaced with a bridge structure and designed as a single span with no piers in
the stream.
• Storm water management should be designed as a closed system. Storm water shall be designed to be
carried across the bridge (no deck drains over the stream) and diverted through grass-lined ditches,
vegetated buffers or directed to a storm water collection device prior to entering North Fork New
River.
^ Use BMPs for bridge demolition and removal, Case 1 (9-20-99 NCDOT policy; see
htip://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/bmp.pdf).
North Carolina Division of Water Duality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd.., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919.733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state nc.uslncwetlands/
~~a
~r~
NCL7EF:

Thank you for requesting our input-at this. time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a §401 Water
Quality Certification requires. that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and desi~griated use's are'nof degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Cynthia ~'an Der Wiele at [phone].
pc: Chris Militscher, USEPA - '
Marla Chambers, NCWRC~ ~ _ ' ` '
File Copy

SECTION .0400 -WATER SUPPLY DESIGN CRITERIA
Rules .0401 - .0408 of Title 15A Subchapter 18C of the North Carolina Administrative Code (T15A.18C .0401 - ..0408); has
been transferred and recodified from Rules .1001 - .1008 Title ] 0 Subchapter ] OD of the North Carolina Administrative Code
(T10.lOD -100] - .1008), effective April 4, ]990.
.0401 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
The design criteria given in this Section are the minimum requirements for approval of plans and specifications by the
Division of Environmental Health, Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources..The Department provides
supplemental criteria for design of water systems in .0500 - .1000.
History Note: Authority G.S. 130A-315; 130A-317,, P.L. 93-.5?3;
Ejf. January 1, 1977;
Readopted Eff. December .S, 1977.
Amended EJf. Juh~ 1, 1994; Septen:ber• 1, 1979.
.0402 WATER SUPPLY WELLS
(a) Well Construction. The constriction of water supply wells shall conform to well construction regulations and standards
of the Division of Environmental Management, N_C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, codified in
15A NCAC 2C which are hereby incorporated by reference including any subsequent amendments and editions. Copies of
this material are available for inspection and may be obtained from the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Health, Public Water Supply Section, P.O. Box 29536, Raleigh, North Carolina
27626-0536 at no charge [NOTE: The netii~ mailing address is 1634 Mail Service CerTter, Raleigh, NC 27699-1634J.
(b) Upper Terminal of Well. The well casing shall neither terminate below ground nor in a pit. The pump pedestal for
above ground pumps of every water supply well shall project not less than six inches above the concrete floor of the well
house, or the concrete stab surrounding the well. The well casing shall project at least one inch above the pump pedestal.
For submersible pumps the casing shall project at least six inches above the concrete floor or slab surrounding the well head.
(c) Sanitary Seal. The upper terminal of the well casing shall be sealed watertight with the exception of a vent pipe or vent
tube having adownward-directed, screened opening.
(d) Concrete Slab or Well House Floor. Every water supply well shall have a continuous bond concrete slab or well house
concrete floor extending at least three feet horizontally around the outside of the well casing. Minimum thickness for the
concrete slab or floor shall be four inches.
(e) Sample Tap and Waste Discharge Pipe. Faucets or spigots shall be provided for sampling both raw water prior to
treatment and treated water prior to delivery to the first customer. Sample spigots shall not be threaded for hose connection.
Threaded hose bibs shall be equipped with anti-siphon devices. A water sample tap and piping arrangement for discharge of
water to waste shall be provided.
(f) Physical Security and Well Protection. A water supply well shall be secured against unauthorized access and protected
from the weather. One of the following structures shall be provided:
(1) Well house. A well house shall be constructed as follows:
(A) Structures shall comply with applicable provisions of state and local building codes;
(B) Drainage shall be provided by floor drain, wall drain, or slope to door;
(C) Access into the structure shall be a doorway with minimum dimensions of 36 inches wide and 80
inches high; and
(D) The structure shall have adequate space for the use and maintenance of the piping and
appurtenances. If treatment is provided at the well, the provisions of Rule .0404(a) of this Section
shall apply.
(E) The structure shall be secured with lock and key.
(2) Prefabricated structures. A prefabricated structure shall be constructed as follows:
(A) A well-head cover shall be hinged and constructed so that it can be lifted by one person;
(B) A locking mechanism shall be provided; and
(C) Permanent fastening to the slab (such as with bolts) shall not be permitted.
(3) Fencing and temperature protection. Fencing and temperature protection shall be constructed as follows:
(A) The fence height shall be a minimum of six feet;
(B) The fence shall be constructed of chain link with locked access;
(C) The fence shall enclose the well; hydropneumatic tank, and associated equipment;
(D) Access shall be provided for maintenance and operation; and

(E) The well, piping, treatment equipment, and electrical controls shall be protected against freezing.
Wrapping with insulation is acceptable for appurtenances such as the air vent, meter, valves, and
sample taps provided they are visible and accessible. Insulation shall be :jacketed.
(g) Yield:
(1) Wells shall be tested for yield and drawdown. A report or log of at least a 24-hour drawdown test to
determine yield shall be submitted to the Division of Environmental Health for each well.
(2) Wells shall be located so that the drawdown of any well will not interfere with the required yield of another
well.
(3) The combined yield of all wells of a water system shall provide in 12 hours pumping time the average daily
demand as determined in Rule .0409 of this Section.
(4) The capacity of the permanent pump to be installed in each well slial] not exceed the yield of the well as
determined by the drawdown test.
(5) A residential community water system using well water as its source of supply and designed to serve 50 or
more connections shall provide at least two wells. A travel trailer park or campground designed to serve
100 or more connections shall provide at least two wells. In lieu of a second well, another approved water
supply source may be accepted.
(6) A totalizing meter shall be installed in the piping system from each well.
(h) Initial Disinfection of Water Supply Well. All new wells, and wells that have been repaired or reconditioned shall be
cleaned of foreign substances such as soil, grease, and oil, and then shall be disinfected. A representative sample or samples
of the water (free of chlorine) shall be collected and submitted to a certified laboratory for bacteriological analyses. After
disinfection the water supply shall not be placed into service until bacteriological test results of representative water samples
analyzed in a certified laboratory are found to be free of bacteriological contamination.
(i) Initial Chemical Analyses. A representative sample of water from every new water supply well shall be collected and
submitted for chemical analyses to the Division of Laboratory Services or to a certified laboratory. The results of the
analysis shall demonstrate the water is treatable to meet water quality standards in Section .1500 of this Subchapter and
needed treatment shall be provided before the well is placed into service.
(j) Continuous Disinfection. Continuous application of chlorine or hypochlorite solution or some other approved and equally
efficient disinfectant shall be provided for all well water supplies introduced on or after January 1, 1972. Equipment for
determining residual chlorine concentration in the water shall be included in the plans and specifications.
History Note: Authority G.S. ]30A-315; I30A-317; P.L. 93-SZ.3;
EJJ. January 1, 1977;
Readopted EJf. Decen:ber• .S, 1977;
Amended EJf. Jrrly 1, 1994; September 1, 1990; January 1, 1986; March 31, 1980.
.0403 SURFACF, WATER FACILITIES
(a) Unimpounded Stream. Both the minimum daily flow of record of the stream and the estimated minimum flow calculated
from rainfall and run-off shall exceed the maximum daily draft for which the water treatment plant is designed with due
consideration given to requirements for future expansion of the treatment plant. The Department may approve a water plant
capacity greater than the minimum daily flow of record of the stream when rules of other government agencies will not be
violated. The maximum allowable system expansion shalt be based on the minimum daily flow of record of the stream.
(b) Pre-settling Reservoirs. Construction of apre-settling or pre-treatment reservoir shall be required where wide and rapid
variations in turbidity, bacterial concentrations or chemical qualities occur or where the following raw water quality standards
are not met: turbidity - 150 NTU, coliform bacteria - 3000/100 ml, fecal coliform bacteria - 300/100 ml, color - 75 CU.
(c) Impoundments. Raw water storage capacity shall be sufficient to reasonably satisfy the designed water supply demand
during periods of drought.
(d) Clearing of Land for Impoundment. The area in and around the proposed impoundment of class I and class II reservoirs
shall be cleared as follows:
(1) The area from normal full level to five feet below the normal pool elevation of the impoundment shall be
cleared and grubbed of all vegetation and shall be kept cleared until the reservoir is filled. Secondary
growth shall be removed prior to flooding.
(2) The entire area below the five foot water depth shall be cleared and shall be kept cleared of all growth of
less than six inches in diameter until the reservoir is filled. Sturnps greater than six inches in diameter may
be cut off at ground level.
(3) All brush, trees, and stumps shall be burned or removed from the proposed reservoir.
(e) Existing Impoundments. Existing impoundments may be approved as raw water sources as follows:
(1) The requirements of Paragraph (c) of this Rule, and Section .0200 of this Subchapter shall be met;
(2) A class I or class II reservoir shall meet the requirements of Section .1200 of this Subchapter; and

(3) The supplier of water shall have an engineer along with other qualified consultants as needed conduct a
study of the impoundment and provide the Department information to determine whether the requirements
of this Subchapter are met. The study shall include as follows:
(A) Plans and specifications of the impounding structure;
(B) Information concerning clearing of the land for impoundment as provided in Paragraph (d) of this
Rule;
(C) Information concerning sources of pollution on the watershed;
(D) Documentation of control by the supplier of water of the impoundment and 50 foot margin around
the impoundment measured from the normal pool elevation;
(E) Information concerning the quality of the water and sediments which could cause water quality
fluctuations such as lake stratification, turnover and algae bloom; and
(F) Other information necessary to show the proposed source will meet the requirements of this
Subchapter.
(f) A margin of at least 50 feet around a class I and class II reservoir measured from the normal pool elevation shall be
owned or controlled by the water supplier.
(g) Intakes, Pumps, Treatment Units, and Equipment. Raw water intakes, pumps, treatment units and equipment shall be
designed to provide water of potable quality meeting the water quality requirements stated in Section .1500 of this
Subchapter.
History Note.- Autha•ity G.S. 1.30A-31.5; 130A-3I7; P.L. 93-.SZ.3;
Eff. January 1, 1977;
Readopted Eff. December .5, 1977;
Amended Eff. J:rly 1, 1994,, July 1, 1991; September 1, 1990.
.0404 WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
(a) Physical Security and Facility Protection. Treatment equipment and chemicals shall be secured against unauthorized
access and shall be protected against the weather as follows:
(1) Structures shall comply with provisions of state and local building codes;
(2) Drainage shall be provided by floor drain, wall drain, or slope to door;
(3) Access to the structure shall be a doorway with minimum dimensions of 36 inches wide and 30 inches high
or larger. The doorway shall be large enough to accommodate installation or removal of equipment; and
(4) The structure shall have space to facilitate operation and maintenance of treatment equipment, storage of
chemicals, required piping and appurtenances, electrical controls, and laboratory testing.
(b) Mixing and Dispersion of Chemicals. Provisions shall be made for mixing and dispersion of chlorine and other
chemicals applied to the water. All facilities treating surface water or ground water influenced by surface water shall comply
with the disinfection requirements in Rule .2002 of this Subchapter.
(c) Chemical Feed Machines
(1) Durable chemical feed machines designed for adjustable accurate control of feed rates shall be installed for
application of all chemicals necessary for appropriate treatment of the water. Sufficient stand-by units to
assure uninterrupted operation of the treatment processes shall be provided. Continuous chemical
application must be protected from electrical circuit interruption which could result in overfeed, underfeed
or interrupt the feed of chemicals.
(2) Chemical feed lines from the feeders to the points of application shall be of material sized for the design
flow rate, corrosion resistant, easily accessible for cleaning and protected against freezing. Length and the
number of bends shall be reduced to a minimum.
(3) Piping and appurtenances shall be constructed of suitable material for the chemical being added and the
specific application.
(4) A separate feeder shall be used for each chemical applied.
(d) Disinfection Equipment:
(1) Equipment designed for application of chlorine, or some other approved, equatly efficient disinfectant shall
be provided. Stand-by units shall be provided. The plans and specifications shall describe the equipment
in detail.
(2) Chlorinators shall be installed in tightly constructed, above ground rooms with mechanical ventilation to
the outside air. The capacity of exhaust fans shall be sufficient to discharge all air in the rooms every 30
seconds to 1 minute. The fans or their suction ducts shall be located not more than eight inches above floor
level. Provisions for entrance of fresh air shall be made. The point of discharge shall be so located as not
to contaminate the air in any building or inhabited areas. Electrical switches for operation of fans shall b::
located outside the chlorinator rooms. Rooms used for storage of chlorine cylinders shall be designed as
described above.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
~^Y~°~ and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael Easley, Governor
Bill Ross, Secretary
Gregory Thorpe, Director
February 20, 2002
Memorandum To: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Through: John Dorney _ ~, ~ (~~
NC Division of Water Quality, 401 U ti ~ ~ \- ~
From: Robert Ridings
NC Division of Water Quality, 401 Unit
Subject: Review of Natural Systems Technical Reports for bridge
replacement projects scheduled for construction in CFY 2005:
"Yellow Light" (Streams classified as Water Supply) Projects:
B-4264, B-4265, B-4266, B~103, Viand B-4247.
In future reports, an Executive Summary Paragraph would be helpful. This should include brief
description of the work intended (i.e., replace bridge with another bridge or with a culvert), the
amount of impact to wetlands and streams, and types of possible permits needed.
On all projects, use of proper sediment and erosion control will be needed. Sediment and erosion
control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be removed from any water
pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the stream. Sedimentation and
Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B .0024) must be
implemented prior to any ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to downstream
aquatic resources. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation must be planted on all bare
soil within 1 D days of ground-disturbing activities to provide long term erosion control.
This office would prefer bridges to be replaced with new bridges. However if the bridge must be
replaced by a culvert and 150 linear feet or more of stream is impacted, a stream mitigation plan
will be needed prior to the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. While the NCDWQ
realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring
mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
Any proposed culverts shall be installed in such a manner [hat the original stream profile is not
altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed).
Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert
extensions.
Wetlands/40l Unit 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite Z50 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Telephone [phone] FAX tt 733-6893

For permitting, any project that falls under the Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permits 23 or 33
do not require written concurrence by the NC Division of Water Quality. Notification and
courtesy copies of materials sent to the Corps, including mitigation plans, are required. For
projects that fall under the Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Bridge
Permit 3l, the formal 401 application process will be required including appropriate fees and
mitigation plans.
Do not use any machinery in the stream channels unless absolutely necessary. Additionally,
vegetation should not be removed from the stream bank unless it is absolutely necessary.
NCDOT should especially avoid removing large trees and undercut banks. If large, undercut
trees must be removed, then the trunks should be cut and the stumps and root systems left in
place to minimize damage to stream banks.
Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization must be minimized; rather, native vegetation should be
planted when practical. If necessary, rip-rap must be limited to the stream bank below the high
water mark, and vegetation must be used for stabilization above high water.
Rules regarding stormwater as described in (15A NCAC 2b.0216 (3) (G)) shall be followed for
these projects. These activities shall minimize built-upon surface area, divert runoff away from
surface waters and maximize utilization of BMPs. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed
in order to allow it to be most effectively utilized for storm water sheet flow.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401
Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water
quality standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost.

1 LL 11 GVV/ 11' 1G 1 \I.LJV 1 VI IL VI \L
Federal Aid # BRZ-2550(1) TIP # B-4703 Cvun~y: Davidson
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bridge No_415 on Slt 2550 over Beaverciam Creek
On 9/1 G/2Q03, representatives of the
[~ North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
[`~ Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
^ There are no erects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
^ There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed an the reverse.
Q There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
'1`her~e is an effect on the National Register~ligible property/properties located within the
project's area ofpotential effect. The propertylpraperties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
FHWA, for the Division Adnunistrator, or other Federal Agency Date
t ~~~.. -- a 16 a ~
Representative, HPO ~ Date
~ f 1r~~o3
State Historic Preselrvation Officer Date

Federal Aid # BRZ-2550(1) TIP # B-4103
County: Davidson
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed {NR} or determined eligible (DE).
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K r ~~~ ~• ~^~/~+~ F/ l~~ L T 1 L`am''
R.eason(s) why the ef~'ect is not adverse (if applicable).
Initialed: NCDOT FHWA ~,~'~~ HPO _
TOTAL P.03

t~5/2b%208' 11:25 NC DOT PDER 7 98511915 N0.4 r1 Di~l~'
J' titir
N'arth CaroliAa Department of Caltural Reso
State Historic Preservakion Qffice
David I,. S. Brook, Administrator
IYlicAael F. ~aaley, G=overnor
Lisbeth C. Evat16, secretary
Jeffrey J. Craw, DepuLY SecretAry
Office of Archives and History
9ugust 14, 2003
1~IEMOR.A.NI7UM

nrn
AUU !.°
r~
~~ ~5/
/fi°atiT b6vE~-`~~~ y l
Division of Historical Resource
TO; Greg Thorpe, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis $ranch
NCDaT Di~ctision of Highways
FRaM: DavidBrooltrr ~. ~~;
1'~
SUBJECT:. Replace Bridge No. 416 on SR 2550 over Beaverdam Creek, B~103,
Davidson County, ER02-8597
Thank yeti for your letter of July 17, 2003, concealing the above project.
We appreciate the additional research undertaken by the bridge suxv'ey architectural historians
in order to evaluate Bridge No. 416.
For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Iistoric Preservation Act, we
concur that Davidson County Bridge No. 416 is eligible of the National Register. T1,e bridge
is significant as an example of the once-common Pony truss bridges of the early twentieth
century and is one of the few e~camples with a documented fabricator.
The above comments are made pw:stk~nt to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Freseraation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Fart 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. l;f you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, eslvi.uonmental rerrievv coordinator, at
919/733-47G3. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
xeferericed tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furs, NCD(aT
ww_ w.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us '
(.ocaHan Muting ~lddresa Telephone/Faz I
,Ib1t11iY2STRAT1oN 507 N. BlountSt., Raleigh NC 4617 N1Ai1 Sorvicc Ccnur, Rylcigh NC.7699.46[7 (4191733-3763 •73;-865]
R£STORATlo,11 SI i N. 9lount St., Raleigh NC 4b 17 ivlail Service Crntct, Raleigh AcC 29699-.Ib t 7 (9191733~;.{T • T15-igDl
StJRV~Y eF ALANNINC SIS N. Dlounl St, Raleigh NC 4417 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 27699-:1617 t9l9) 733b515 •715-s9a1

,a ,n,
~~~ X31
~~ ,t~s3
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State (-listoric Preservation Office
Davit L.. S [honk, Adlninistntor
~~lichacl f L"aslev. Govemnr
L.ishelh C L•vans, Secretary
1elTrcy J Crow, Deputy Sccrelary
Ollicc ul :lrchiv~s and 1-lishlry
l~iav G, ?OU2

~I'O: William D. Gilmore, I~danager
Project Development and Environmental .lnalvsis Branch
Division ~f Highways
Department of Transportation
FRL)(vl: David Brool: ~e+ ~Qtl~.d ~'~
~~ U
Sl_iBjECT: Replace Bridge 41C on SR ?550 over Beaverdam Creek,
)3--1 ] 03, Davidson County, 1 ~,R 02-8507
Division nl Historical Resources
Davit 1 Olson, Director
REEF/~
O
Z ~ MQY 8
~ a ?Dn?
ti`~T H~M~ ~ ~0.~
O Y5 0. •~'
F~"~~FIOPMEN~ Ei~~
~~~ ANALYSE
Thank you for your memorandum of September 25, 2001, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a search of our Files and are aware of no structures of historical or architectural
importance located \vithin the planning area. However, since a comprehensive historical
architectural inventory of has never been conducted, there may be structures of which eve are
unaware located within the planning area.
The bridge appears to be a metal truss which may need to be evaluated. The aerial photograph also
shows a house at the northwest corner of the bridge that will need to be evaluated, if it is more than
fifty years old.
There are no known archaeological sites within the project area. Based on our knowledge of the
area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for conclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section l OG of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisors Council on Historic Presen~ation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 500.
Thank you for tour cooperation and consideration. If ~~ou have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Farlet, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all
Eunue communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
17I3:kgc
cc: ~Iar~ P(>hc I•urr, NC.1~O'1'
Location ~lailim~ :\ddrrss Tclrphonc/Fax
:\dminislralion ~il;• N Bluum 51. Raleigh. NC -11+17 \I:lil SeniceCenter R:Ilri!_h _'7h99--1h17 1(II~)1 7;3-1763 •7i;-\b;t
Rcshiralion ~ I ~ \' I31~•unl SI R;Ilrieh \~( ~1+1 ~ \lail ti~tn icy Crntrl. R:Ilciglt 27h9~1-~hl? 11191 73 ~-(~?~1 i •71 ~-~ti111
_._.. ... .. ... .. •.~.•_~~o ~ u..r.:..i, ~~.:uu_v.l~ ~UIN~7:;_.3'.h3 .71 >-~YI11

-,
_ n f !,
~~:~ ~;:
~~~ ~ Y
n ~a SGVr o
- ~ r~~
s
~~ ,..nom-, .~ '.f!,1; n
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources~;~°~'~ '=+- ;
State Historic Preservation Office ~ ;;.^.~ ,: ~,~:~
David L. S. Brook, Administrator .... ~, `s
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
December 20, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
Division of Historicalltestiiiruces
David J. Olson, Drrector
E~~ i Zr{ ~i'1:;~i -:;y
;?
~ 1Ft ~..i~, . , . ; ;
,. ) i
FROM: David Brook i E:'= ~ _ ;~.;±', ~ ~ ~,~ ~_
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 416 over Beaver Dam Creek, SR 2550, Badin Lake Road,
B-4103, Davidson County, ER02-8597
Thank you for your letter of October 24, 2002, concerning the above project.
%e have conducted a search of our maps and files and located the following structure of historical or architectural
importance withni the general area of this project:
Bridge 416
We recommend that a Department of Transportation architectural historian identify and evaluate any structures
over fifty years of age within the project area, and report the findings to us.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our knowledge of the area, it is
unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for conclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted
in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact
Renee Gledhill-Eaxley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning
this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
DB:doc
cc: Mary Pope Furr -
Matt Wilkerson
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh , NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Curvav R Plwnnino 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone] •715-4801

Federu(.aid : BRL-?~~0(1) TlP r 8-d l03 Cuunn~ Davidson
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description' Replace Bridge No. d 16 on SR 2550 over Beaverdam Creeh
On I Oi01/2002, representatives of the
(~, North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
[~/ Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project at
a Scoping meeting
0/ Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
^ Other
All parties present agreed
^ There are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects.
[~ There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
project's area of potential effects.
[~ There are properties over fifty years old within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE), but based on the
historical information available and the photographs of each property, the property identified as
~1'Dt~2J1 ~-l.t ~' ~ is considered not eligible for the National
Regist rand no rther evaluation of it is necessary.
[~ There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
^ All properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered at this consultation, and based
upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
^ There are no historic properties affected by this project. (attnch uny notes or doc:~menrs ns needed
Signed:
I U • D (--ZDDZ
Date
FHWA, f r the Division Admi istrator, or ottleLFederal Agency Date

(~ - ~ 1 ---
Representative, HPO ' Date \

/~~ / ~`..
~; ?
r.

State Historic Preservation Officer ~l~~ Date
If a survey report is prepared, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.

- .
sf ¢~6~
r ~ •' -
`~- s.
1~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPAR'I7VIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 11, 2001
Dear School Transportation Director:
Subject: Bridge No. 416 on Highway 5R 2550, over Beaverdam Creek, Davidson County TIP
Project No. B-4103
The N.C. Department of Transportation has begun the planning process to replace the above
bridge, which is nearing the end of its useful fife. Construction is planned for year 2005.
Alternative methods of replacing the bridge will be studied. Some alternatives may require road
closure at the bridge site. In that case, all traffic would be detoured onto other local roads.
The type of bridge or structure that we select will determine how long the road would have to
remain closed. However, the time of closure would not be longer than 8-12 months.
We would like to know the specific number of bus crossings per day and if road closure could
be handled by re-routing or other changes, or if it would create an unworkable situation for your school
bus operations. -
We ask that you let us know your opinion in writing by using the enclosed addressed envelope.
We need to have your reply by July 31 2001.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Your answers will help us plan more effectively for
this necessary bridge replacement to serve our citizens better.
ff you have any questions concerning the projects, please contact me at 919-733-7844, ext.
258 .
' cerely~
////// ~~r~~r ~c~c1.z_
avis Moore
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
Rm a~~H NC 27699-1548
Mc. Mooce,
e~-c,r~~~~r, ~b~s~~ ~co,~. o,,~.C..
ccesss ~1.is 6~;~ge. WQ C0.w c`1~S1ar~' ooc
bvLs Pov-~e5 {o ~ne~ Ocesz ~~+z prid9~ eVe~
___-,
~ ~ ndt~ ocese. _~ Yee ~ave ~-'"Y l
,Nts~ iohq~ ~al Qaye o,~ V! M~ a C41, ,
T~a.-ks,
~ ''a'~
TELEPHONE: 919-T33~141
FAX: [phone]
WEBSlTE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUrH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

SUBJECT: Replacement of bridge No. 416 on SR 2550 over Beaver Dam Creek, Davidson
County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-2550(1), State Project No. 8.2604601, TIP
No. B~103.
20 November O1
Mr. Moore,
The replacement of this bridge and the possible re-routing of traffic will not have a noticeable
effect on the response of Davidson County Emergency Services.
Thank You,
De Welch, Emergency Services Director

V
one on~c~ ~;.~~~~n ~Sc~iools
~ ~
441 Page Street P.O. Bo:~ 427 Troy, I~+Torth Carolina 27371-0427
(9i0) 576-6511 FAX 1910) 57fi-2041

NC Department Of Transportation
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and
Enviroiurrental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
1`10u .. ~ ~
z, ,c.~
<; , u1`Ji5 ~ ~
fC `~, ~~~~Q~
`~~ r,~ L P.r-~ ~~-
SUBJECT: Request for comments on Bridge Replacement Projects B-4103
Dear Mr. Thorpe
In reply to your letter dated November 14, 2002, I would like to submit our
concerns on the replacement of the subject bridge.
If our buses are detoured while the new bridge is being built, it will cause a fifteen
mile detour for buses that are already twenty miles from school. The students on these
buses spend one hour and forty-five minutes every morning and afternoon traveling to
school as it is. The detour would add ride time for the students who already ride one of
the longest routes we have. We would hope that the old bridge could stay in place while
the nev,~ bridge is being built.
Thank y:,u fir all:,~ving us to voice our concern in this project.
~~i~~c_3
r,
Sincer'e'ly" ~'

Greg Jdlinson
Montgomery County Schools
Director of Transportation
PO Box 427
Troy, NC 27371
An Equal O;~pvrtunin~ afftrma:ive ,Anion FmPlo er

~~
8bSi-669L~ Euiioie7 q~oN `uDiaiE~
.~axua~ aainaas liEi~i gbSi
gauuig sis~Cisud iu~uaumonnug pue ~uauidoianaQ aaafoid
uoi~a~odsuEiZ 301uau~EdaQ Eutio.~E~ u~toN
aauen ougg ~.zy~

O
~ ~
~ ^~ ~ e
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a •~ y ~' C h tV N ~ b0
^ ~ 4 w 3 ~,
b
rii ~ ~ ~ ~ O .L h O ~ •~ ~~ a'^' % Nq/`fir .ir
/~ r/~ ~y vT
^ ,,,y~
~ O ~ p J ~ ~ ~ ~ in , a.? J r
A '
~y o '. Ca ~' ~ o ~ ~ c J
v ~ o ~° W v ~ ~ U
sue. ~ ° ~ ~? ~ " Q•' ; a N a; °- c
f~ v~ D v~ ! ¢ v~ W rn cn r~ ! U v~ U V
.^.
ccs 'C3 p~ o ~ ~ cd ~ ~' ~° ~ y = a> U
.... E..a ~ O ~ ^ U ^ ~ ^ ~
4-. pD ^D ' v} ,_ f-~ +, p f'~ O •., _ C> ~n ' _ ~ X34
~.
~ O -p i+ cti 0 ~O a ~ O U ~ ~>.
~_ v ~ ~~
U ^ _
Q . c~ can cd ~ OU Q~, cd ^ ^ >' O y y - 3
d' a a- ~ ~ ~ o o ~ a. 4=. 3
f'~ G^ ~ Q.~ N U Z N~ y O y O U~ U ?? •_ ~ `+ cd N U ..^.. y~ •= O
U > C•D O. +=, ~"~ i. N O U = vi ~.+ ~ a. U U cd RS y ~ p
a. ~ U - O N ~ O C U +.+ ..O ~ ~ a; +U. 4r _. y +=~ 3 G 'L7
Icy ~ t„i _ ~ i.~ ~y L p LS. ~ Ly U ~ .~: QJ' Q~ y ~ ~ ~ .~ '
O f"+ = ~ - ~ .~ .~+ ~ ~ ~~~// -0 d4 E-~ 3 ~ '~' O . _~ ~:+ N C. fl. O N ~_ c. ' 3
1.y` c~ Q 't7 F'" "s N U a. W pi 4. ~ ~ U > .~ ~, y `. D\ O 7 O
Ll. O ~ ~'
"~~ z .-. v~ni U ~' ',_. ~ = ~ a~i a~i ~ o ~ y ~ ~ o, a°~i ~ ~ ai ~ ~ c~ dD F'" 'ti
L N , p f V ~ •,r~ ~ ~ O O :. pp ~ U i 44,,, c~ O ~ y L c_UC • O +-~ O • ~ U ^
~ LY cG U ~ 'O- 4., S.c . ~ O -^ O L ~ 'C3 > > ~ •~i a. G. ~ ~ 44-. y
C`-r E~ .~ vi Q '> a...._ isr E--~ .~ ~° 3 ~° Q. D a v ~ y - a o ~ x ~ ^
d • c~ U .«+ a~ ,~. o

ALCOA
November 18, 2002
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D.
Environmental Management Director
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dr. Thorpe:
Alcoa Primary Metals
Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
Yadkin Division
293 NC 740 Hwy
PO Box 576
Badin, NC 28009-0576 USA

NOV 20 2002
m .~
,~% :~,~ r~;tsbre~ 2a
~.~~rr~. ~~r: V~ pM~`~ ~~-
<.c .,.:
I am writing in response to the request for comments on B-4103, Davidson
County, Division 9, replace Bridge No. 416 over Beaver Dam creek on SR 2550.
As background, under the Federal Power Act, Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
(APGI) is licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to
operate hydroelectric Project No. 2197. Yadkin is the division of APGI
responsible for operating the Project. Narrows Reservoir is one of the
developments of the Project. Under its license, Yadkin may only exercise certain
authority "if the proposed use and occupancy is consistent with the purposes of
protecting and enhancing the scenic, recreational, and other environmental
values of the project." In order to ensure that these values are maintained,
Yadkin has adopted a Shoreline Management Plan, which was approved by
FERC on November 9, 2000. Additionally, APGI owns the land under the normal
full pool (541' contour, all contour references are Yadkin datum) of Narrows
Reservoir.
Bridge No. 416 crosses the Beaver Dam Creek arm of Narrows Reservoir and
accordingly is within the Project. Yadkin's Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-
use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures (Procedures) govern
activities within the Project, such as the proposed bridge replacement. Bridge
No. 416 is not located within a conservation zone or in an area of sensitive
habitat. For bridge replacements not impacting a conservation zone Yadkin's
permitting process requires the completion of Yadkin's Agency Consultation (AC)
process before Yadkin can issue a Construction Permit for the proposed
improvements. A copy of the Procedures, which detail Yadkin's AC process, has
been included for your convenience.

In order to begin discussions regarding a lease or right of way easement across
APGI property Yadkin asks that (1) the NCDOT provide two copies of their
survey and/or design drawings for the improvement project and (2) that the
appropriate right of way agent contact Pat Shaver, Yadkin's Power and Property
Coordinator at [phone], to arrange a meeting to explain Yadkin's
procedures for obtaining an easement (3) requested right of way easement be
flagged for APGI's Phase I walkover. Please be aware that Yadkin cannot issue
a lease or easement to NCDOT and NCDOT may not commence construction
activity within the Project or on APGI property until satisfactory completion of
Yadkin's AC process.
If you need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at (704)
422-5644.

Robert Smet
Natural Resources Specialist

SUBDIVISION ACCESS APPROVAL, MULTI-USE FACILITY O
PERMITTING, AND INDUSTRIAL, APPROVAL PROCEDURES ALCOA
YADKIN PROJECT, FERC NO. 2197
July 1, 1999 (Revision Date: July 1, 2002)
I. OVERVIEW
A. General
The Yadkin Project (Pro.ject) includes four reservoirs: High Rock, Tuckertown, Narrows (Badin Lake),
and Falls. The Project is licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as project
number 2197. As a FERC licensee, Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI), through its Yadkin Division
(Yadkin), operates and manages the Project reservoirs in accordance with the terms of its license and the
applicable rules and regulations of FERC. These responsibilities include providing adequate public access
and public recreation facilities and protecting important natural, environmental, cultural, and scenic
resources.
These Procedures apply to subdivisions adjoining the FERC-licensed Project boundary (Project Boundary)
or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer (defined below) and multi-use facilities and industrial uses/facilities within
the Project Boundary, on the Yadkin-Managed Buffer, or on Yadkin-Managed Lands (defined below).
Generally, the Project Boundary follows the normal full-pool elevation of the four reservoirs. Any land or
waters lying within the Project Boundary are regulated by FERC through the terms of the Project license
and are covered under these Procedures. Property owned by APGI, or its parent company, Alcoa [nc.
(Alcoa), includes the land below the waters of the reservoirs and the generating facilities.
In addition, along many areas of the reservoir shorelines, Yadkin manages property that is owned by APGI
or Alcoa. In some cases, this ownership is a narrow strip of shoreline property. Often, ownership of these
shoreline parcels is to a specific elevation contour and, therefore, the width of these parcels can vary
considerably depending on the shoreline topography. On Narrows Reservoir, APGUAIcoa owns a narrow
strip of shoreline property around nearly the entire reservoir, generally to an elevation of 545.0 feet
(Yadkin datum), approximately 4 vertical feet above the normal full-pool elevation of the reservoir.
APGUAIcoa also owns some narrow strips of shoreline property around portions of High Rock Reservoir.
Most of the High Rock shoreline strips are also owned to a specified elevation. Collectively, these strips
of shoreline property, up to 100 feet from the Project Boundary, are considered "Yadkin-Managed Buffer."
[n other areas, APGI/Alcoa owns shoreline property that extends back from the water a considerable
distance. In these areas, the first 100 feet of shoreline property from the normal full-pool elevation of the
reservoirs is also considered "Yadkin-Managed Buffer." All other APGI/Alcoa lands more than 100 feet
from the Project Boundary are referred to as "Yadkin-Managed Lands."
Yadkin allows public access to Project lands and waters, so far as consistent with the proper operation of
the Project, and also to portions of the Yadkin-Managed Buffer for purposes of navigation and recreation,
including fishing and hunting. All other uses of the Project lands and waters, or the Yadkin-Managed
Buffer, including the development of private access, subdivision access, multi-use recreation facilities
(marinas, boat docks, fishing piers, boat launches, etc.), and industrial uses/facilities, require Yadkin's
written permission. Private access across or other use ofYadkin-Managed Lands is generally not granted.
These Procedures outline the steps that must be taken by developers seeking Yadkin's permission to use or
occupy Project lands and waters or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer or to develop a subdivision where private
access requests are anticipated.

In addition, Yadkin has adopted a Shoreline Stewardship Policy (Stewardship Policy), which summarizes
Yadkin's policies, procedures, and requirements regarding use of the Project lands and waters and the
Yadkin-Managed Buffer. Developers are encouraged to obtain a copy of the Stewardship Policy and
familiarize themselves with the Policy and the procedures and requirements that developers and owners of
adjoining property and others must comply with in order to maintain eligibility to construct, maintain,
and/or operate facilities within the Project Boundary or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer.
Under its FERC license, AGPI, through its Yadkin Division has the authority to grant permission for
certain types of use and occupancy of Project lands and waters and to convey certain interests in Project
lands and waters. However, this can be done only if the proposed use and occupancy is consistent with the
purposes of protecting and enhancing the scenic, recreational, and other environmental values of the
Project. Therefore, Yadkin has the continuing responsibility to supervise and control the uses and
occupancies for which it grants permission, and to monitor the use of, and ensure compliance with, the
covenants of the instrument of conveyance for any interests that it has conveyed under its FERC license. If
a permitted use or occupancy violates any condition of Yadkin's FERC license or any other condition
imposed by Yadkin for the protection and enhancement of the Project's scenic, recreational, or other
environmental values, or if a covenant of a conveyance made under the authority of its FERC license is
violated, Yadkin will take any lawful action necessary to correct the violation. For a permitted use or
occupancy, that action includes, if necessary, (i) canceling permission to use and occupy Project lands or
waters, (ii) requiring the removal, at the perYnittee's sole expense, of any non-complying structures and
facilities, and (iii) appropriate restoration and/or mitigation, up to and including restoring Project lands and
waters and the Yadkin-Managed Buffer to their original condition. Yadkin also has the right to take
similar actions for violations regarding the Yadkin-Managed Buffer and other Yadkin-Managed Lands.
Enforcement of these Procedures is discussed in more detail in Section VII, below.
B. Subdivisions
Reservoir access for lots in new subdivisions adjoining the Project Boundary or the Yadkin-Managed
Buffer will not be granted unless the proposed subdivision access is first reviewed and approved by
Yadkin. Only after Yadkin has approved the subdivision access will any lots be eligible to apply for either
a construction permit or a private recreation facility (individual or shared pier) permit. In the case of
subdivisions for which the developer is proposing multi-use facilities (as defined below), prior notice to or
prior approval by FERC may also be required.
The subdivision access approval process is a procedure under which Yadkin, or in certain cases, FERC,
determines whether the requirements of Yadkin's FERC license are met as they relate to the effect of the
reservoir access anticipated for the subdivision on the reservoir and adjoining shoreline. Included in this
determination is a final decision, with respect to lot width, water depth and cove width only, as to whether
certain lots adjacent to the reservoir shoreline are eligible for a private pier. For lots that are deemed
eligible for a private pier as part of this subdivision approval process, the procedures and requirements set
forth in the Stewardship Policy or Specifications for Private Recreation Facilities at High Rock and
Narrows Reservoirs (Specifications) must also be complied with before Yadkin will issue a construction
permit to any lot owner.
The subdivision approval process requires that the subdivision developer prepare an Environmental
Assessment (EA) for some proposed subdivisions. A full EA, as described in Section V below, is required
for the following types of subdivisions:
1. Any subdivision with lots adjacent to a Project reservoir shoreline that is located wholly or partly
within the shoreline Conservation Zone, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP,
Appendix D)
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 2 of 23

2. Any subdivision with more than.5 lots adjacent to a Project reservoir shoreline (even if the subdivision
is not located in the shoreline Conservation Zone)
3. Any subdivision adjacent to the Project reservoir shoreline with proposed multi-use facilities that,
considered in the aggregate, can accommodate more than 10 watercraft
Developers of all other types of subdivisions are not required to prepare a full EA, but must complete the
Agency Consultation Process described irr Section VI below.
Subdivision developers seeking to include multi-use facilities as part of the subdivision, including piers
serving more than two lots, boat launches, community swimming areas, marinas, or other
cotmunity/group facilities, need only complete a single EA for the proposed subdivision. In these cases,
the EA must include information required for both the private access needs of the subdivision and multi-
use facility aspects of the proposed subdivision, and will be used by Yadkin to review and approve the
private access needs of the subdivision and any proposed multi-use facilities.
C. Multi-Use Facilities
Yadkin must review and approve the' construction, modification (reconstruction, additions, or expansion),
and operation of any multi-use recreation or access facility (as defined in Section III) occupying lands or
waters within the Project Boundary or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer. Repairs to an existing multi-use
facility that require a building permit from the applicable County also require a written construction permit
from Yadkin. Additional guidance maybe obtained by Yadkin upon request. Depending upon the type of
facility being proposed, prior notice to or the prior approval of FERC may also be required.
Consistent with its FERC license, Yadkin may authorize certain multi-use recreation and access facilities
occupying Project lands and waters only if the proposed use and occupancy is consistent with the purposes
of protecting and enhancing the scenic, recreational, and other environmental values of the Project. The
multi-use facility permitting process is a procedure whereby Yadkin, or in some cases FERC, determines
whether the requirements of Yadkin's license are met as they relate to the effect of the construction and
operation of proposed multi-use facilities on the reservoir and adjoining shoreline.
To be eligible for amulti-use facility construction or operating permit, the applicant must be an owner of
property adjoining either the reservoirs or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer (adjoining property owner).
The multi-use facility permit process requires the developer to prepare an EA for some types of proposed
facilities. A full EA, as described in Section V below, is required for any proposed new construction or
modification of the following types of multi-use facilities:
1. Any multi-use facility that is located wholly or partly within the shoreline Conservation Zone, as
delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP, Appendix D);
2. Any multi-use facility(ies)~ that is designed to accommodate more than 10 watercraft; or
~ For subdivisions and commercial enterprises, Yadkin will aggregate all proposed multi-use facilities, except for
planned individual and shared piers, to determine the total number of watercraft that the facilities can accommodate.
If, considered in the aggregate, the proposed multi-use facilities can accommodate more than 10 watercraft, then
collectively the multi-use facilities will require prior FERC approval. If, considered in the aggregate, the facilities can
accommodate 10 or fewer watercraft, then the multi-use facilities will be permitted on an individual basis as shown
above.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 3 of 2.3

3. Any comrrrercial multi-use facility that accommodates watercraft and is located within I/2 mile of an
existing marina.
Developers of all other types of multi-arse facilities are not required to prepare a full EA, but must
complete the Agency Consultation Process described in Section VI below.
Upon completion of the multi-use facility permitting process and any required prior FERC notice or
approval, Yadkin will issue a construction permit for the proposed multi-use facility. Following
construction and after a final inspection of the new facility, Yadkin will issue amulti-use facility operating
permit. Multi-Use facility operating permits must be renewed every 5 years, and may be terminated by
Yadkin in accordance with the terms of the multi-use operating permit, or for failure to abide by the
Stewardship Policy and ether applicable Yadkin procedures and requirements.
D. Industrial Uses/Facilities
Uses or facilities other than those related to recreation and adjoining property owner access to the Project
are generally considered industrial uses. All industrial uses/facilities of, or on, Project lands and waters,
the Yadkin-Managed Buffer, or Yadkin-Managed Lands require Yadkin's written permission. Depending
upon the proposed use/facility, Yadkin may be required to obtain prior approval from FERC or to provide
FERC with prior notice before approving the proposed industrial facility/use, as described in Section IV
below.
Yadkin requires developers of all proposed industrial uses/facilities that require prior FERC approval to
prepare and submit an EA, as outlined in Section V below, as part of their request to Yadkin for
permission to use/occupy Project lands and waters, the Yadkin-Managed Buffer, or Yadkin-Managed
Lands. For all other proposed industrial uses/facilities, the developer must conduct an Agency
Consultation Process, as described in Section VI below.
E. Contact Yadkin Early
Entities considering the development of subdivisions adjoining the Project Boundary or the Yadkin-
Managed Buffer, the construction of new multi-use or industrial uses/facilities or the modification of
existing facilities should contact Yadkin as early as possible in the planning process to discuss the specific
permitting/approval requirements that apply to the proposed activity and to obtain copies of the appropriate
application materials and instructions. Yadkin can be contacted at the address and phone numbers below:
Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
Yadkin Division
Box 576
Badin, NC 28009
1-888-886-1063
704-422-5678
II. SUBDIVISION ACCESS APPROVAL PROCESS
A three-part process is utilized for the review and approval of access for planned subdivisions adjoining
the Project Boundary or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer. The three parts are: 1)pre-application meeting; 2)
application development; and 3) subdivision access approval notification. Each is described below.
'~- -
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 4 of 23

A. Pre-Application Meeting
1. A subdivision developer must meet with Yadkin prior to submitting an application for subdivision
access approval. This initial meeting should be held as early as possible in the planning process to
avoid confusion and delay in preparing information required for the application.
2. Prior to the meeting, the developer must complete aPre-Application Meeting Worksheet that identifies
the information that the developer is expected to bring to the meeting, including:
a. Maps or sketches showing the location of the, proposed subdivision with respect to the reservoir
shoreline and existing property boundaries;
b. General information on the proposed subdivision, including:
i) the number of subdivision lots and the number, size, and type of other facilities involved;
ii) the anticipated need for access to Project lands or waters;
iii) the anticipated need for use of or access across the Yadkin-Managed Buffer or other Yadkin-
Managed Lands;
c. A proposed schedule for submitting the application and constructing the proposed subdivision;
d. The name, address, and phone number of a Professional Engineer that the developer proposes to
certify any planned multi-use facilities;
e. The name, address, and phone number of the environmental professional(s) that the developer
proposes to conduct the required EA.
At the pre-application meeting, Yadkin will review the information on the proposed subdivision access
for consistency with the Stewardship Policy and other applicable requirements, review the
requirements for completing the subdivision approval process including the EA, and provide a list of
reviewing agencies.
B. Application Development
1. A developer seeking subdivision access approval must file a completed EA or complete the Agency
Consultation Process foY the proposed subdivision. The Agency Consultation Process is detailed in
Section VI of these Procedures. Specifications for conducting an EA are detailed in Section V of this
document.
2. An EA is required for any of the following types of subdivisions:
a. Any subdivision with lots adjacent to a Project reservoir shoreline that is located wholly or partly
within the shoreline Conservation Zone, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan
(SMP, Appendix D)
b. Any subdivision with more than 5 lots adjacent to a Project reservoir shoreline (even if the
subdivision is not located in the shoreline Conservation Zone)
c. Any subdivision adjacent to the Project reservoir shoreline with proposed multi-use facilities that,
considered in the aggregate, can accommodate more than 10 watercraft
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 5 of 23

3. EAs are not required for other types of subdivisions, but the developer must complete the Agency
Consultation Process described in Section VI of this document.
4. The EA must be prepared by a qualified environmental professional or consulting firm.
The subdivision developer must submit the EA to Yadkin as part of the Subdivision Access Approval
Application. A complete application must include:
a. An Application Checklist.
b. A completed EA or Agency Consultation Process package. Note that for proposed subdivisions,
the completed EA must contain the information in Section V.A.I.a-e.
c. A copy of the final subdivision covenants that establish the required 100-foot forested setback
requirement consistent with the Stewardship Policy.
d. Copies of all correspondence from resource agencies regarding the EA, including alt comment
letters, minutes of meetings with agencies, and any other information relevant to the review of the
EA.
e. Two copies of the subdivision plat map that will be recorded and approved by the county in which
the subdivision is to be located.
A non-refundable subdivision access approval application fee in accordance with Yadkin's current
fee schedule for subdivision applications.
Yadkin will review the application for completeness. If Yadkin finds the application to be incomplete,
it may request additional information from the applicant.
Upon finding that an application is complete, Yadkin will determine the applicable FERC notice or
approval requirements. For any aspect of the subdivision that requires prior FERC notice or approval,
Yadkin will provide notice to or file a request with FERC for the proposed subdivision. The decision
on whether any aspect of the proposed subdivision requires FERC approval will be made solely by
Yadkin on a case-by-case basis. If prior FERC approval is required, the applicant should anticipate at
least a 90-day review period by FERC.
C. Subdivision Access Approval
1. Yadkin will determine whether to issue approval of the proposed subdivision access based on its
review of the application package and, where applicable, FERC's response. Yadkin's determination
will be based, in part, on the following criteria:
a. The proposed subdivision access and the applicable subdivision covenants are consistent with
Yadkin's requirements for shoreline development and will satisfy the 100-foot forested setback
requirement outlined in the Stewardship Policy.
b. The proposed subdivision access will not adversely impact the reservoir and shoreline
environment, or the developer has proposed measures to adequately mitigate any adverse
environmental impacts.
1 ~
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 6 of 23

c. The proposed subdivision access will not adversely impact any significant cultural resources
located in the reservoirs or along its shoreline, or the developer has proposed measures to
adequately mitigate any adverse impacts to cultural resources.
d. The proposed subdivision adequately addresses safety impacts and will not unduly impede or
restrict public use of, or access to, the Project reservoirs.
e. Lots in the subdivision for which the developer anticipates private or shared piers will meet
Yadkin's minimum requirements for lot width, water depth, and cove width.
f. The proposed subdivision access EA has been reviewed by federal and State resource agencies and
the reviewing agencies have indicated tltat they have no concerns or that their concerns have been
adequately addressed by the developer.
g. In the case of proposed subdivisions with any aspect that requires prior FERC notice or approval,
Yadkin finds acceptable any requirements or conditions imposed by FERC.
2. Yadkin reserves the right to make case-by-case determinations in situations that are not explicitly
covered by these Procedures.
3. As stated in Section. I.B. above, the subdivision access approval process is a procedure whereby
Yadkin, or in certain cases, FERC, determines whether the requirements of Yadkin's FERC license are
rnet as they relate to the effect of the reservoir access anticipated for the subdivision on the reservoir
and adjoining shoreline. Included in this.detennination is a final decision, with respect to lot width,
water depth and cove width only, as to whether certain lots adjacent to the reservoir shoreline are
eligible for a private pier. Although the determination is subject to being revoked for failure to
conform to the Stewardship Policy or other permitting requirements existing at the time the private
access approval is granted, or by supervening regulatory authorities that are not within Yadkin's
control, it is unaffected by changes in ownership of the individual lots.
4. If Yadkin decides to approve the proposed subdivision access, Yadkin will issue the developer a
written approval. This approval will contain a list of lots within the subdivision that Yadkin has
determined meet Yadkin's current requirements for minimum lot width, water depth, and cove width.
Aside from this subdivision access approval (constituting a current statement of eligibility for a private
pier from an environmental and recreational perspective), Yadkin can offer no assurances regarding
future cltanges in environmental and recreational requirements or the effect of such changes on private
pier eligibility, including Yadkin's or FERC's discretion under the Federal Power Act to continue to
permit such facilities.
5. After Yadkin has approved the proposed subdivision access, Yadkin will begin processing private pier
applications. Individual lot owners must apply for a construction permit and then a private recreation
facility permit, and must comply with the Stewardship Policy and the Specifications.
6. The primary sanctions for failure by the lot owner to comply with any of the Stewardship Policy
requirements, including the 100-foot forested setback requirement, include the loss of eligibility for a
private recreation facility permit and use of, or private access across, the Yadkin-Managed Buffer.
Yadkin will also require corrective action including but not limited to restoration and/or mitigation.
For enforcement details, see Section VII, below.
7. In the subdivision access approval letter, Yadkin will also provide a list of lots that are not considered
eligible for private or shared piers, along with an explanation of why these lots are not eligible.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-[Jse Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 7 of 23

8. The subdivision developer is responsible for laying-out the proposed subdivision such that all lots can
meet the 100•-foot forested setback requirement. Yadkin will only grant setback variances where
compliance with the 100-foot forested setback requirement would render a particular lot unbuildable2.
If any individual lot is denied pier eligibility because the lot is not sufficiently sized to meet the
required 100-foot forested setback, a developer may apply to Yadkin for a setback variance for that lot.
In those instances, Yadkin expects the number of variances granted within a given subdivision will not
exceed .5% of the total number of lots. Yadkin will grant no variances for failure to satisfy minimum
water depth, lot width, and cove width requirements.
9. If Yadkin denies the subdivision access application, a written statement will be mailed to the applicant
stating the reasons for denial. An applicant may reapply for subdivision access approval at any time.
An applicant can also request a meeting with Yadkin to discuss the reasons for application denial and
steps, if any, that the applicant may take to improve the application.
III. MULTI-USE FACILITY PERMITTING PROCESS
A. General
1. Multi-Use facilities are any public or private facilities, other than private individual or shared piers
(two adjoining lot owners), for recreation or for purposes of accessing Project lands or waters.
2. A multi-use facility construction permit from Yadkin is required before construction of any new multi-
use facilities or modification of any existing multi-use facilities that occupy Project lands or waters or
that are wholly or partly located on the Yadkin-Managed Buffer. Repairs to an existing multi-use
facility that require a building permit from the applicable County also require a written construction
permit from Yadkin. Additional guidance may be obtained by Yadkin upon request.
3. Following construction, operation of these facilities requires amulti-use facility operating permit from
Yadkin.
4. Under its FERC license, Yadkin may authorize certain types of multi-use facilities on Project lands or
waters without prior FERC notice or approval. Other facilities require prior FERC notice or approval.
Table 1 summarizes the types of multi-use facilities that Yadkin may approve without prior FERC
notice, those that require a 45-day prior notice to FERC, and those that require prior FERC approval.
Table 1 also indicates EA and Agency Consultation Process requirements for various types of multi-
use facilities. In the case of a new subdivision for which more than one multi-use facility is proposed,
Yadkin will aggregate the proposed multi-use facilities and consider the combined number of
watercraft that could be accommodated by the facilities in determining the applicable FERC notice or
approval requirements.
An unbuildable lot is defined as a lot which cannot otherwise accommodate athree-bedroom house of 1,800 square
feet. A developer is responsible for platting the subdivision so as to minimize the number of unbuildable lots.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 8 of 23

Table 1
Sununary of Multi-tJse Facility Types and Required Prior FERC Notice/Approval
Facility Description Facility Type FERC Prior FERC EA or Type of
45-Day Approval Agency Yadkin
Notice Required Consultation Permit
Required (AC) Required
Re uired~
Facility(ies) accommodates more than 10 Marina No Yes EA Multi-Use
watercraft and is operated as part of a (commercial)
commercial ente rise.'-
Facility(ies) accommodates more than 10 Marina (non- No Yes EA Multi-Use
watercraft and is not operated as part of a commercial)
commercial ente rise.'`
Facility(ies) accommodates 1-10 Marina Yes No AC Multi-Use
watercraft and is operated as part of a (commercial)
commercial ente rise.
Facility(ies) accommodates watercraft, is Marina No Yes EA Multi-Use
operated as part of a commercial (commercial)
enterprise, and is located within 1/2 mile
of an existin marina.
Facility(ies) accommodates 1-10 Boat Dock No No AC Multi-Use
watercraft, is not operated as part of a
commercial enterprise, and is not a
rivate (individual or shared) ier.
Facility(ies) is a boat launch ramp Boat Launch Yes No AC Multi-Use
operated as part of a commercial Ramp
ente rise or rovides other services. (commercial)
Facility(ies) is a boat launch ramp not Boat Launch No No AC Multi-Use
operated as part of a commercial Ramp (non-
enterprise and provides no other commercial)
services.
Facility(ies) is a pier with no Multi-Use Pier Yes No AC Multi-Use
accommodation far watercraft and is (commercial)
operated as part of a commercial
enterprise (examples include commercial
fishin iers).
Facility(ies) is a pier with no Multi-Use Pier No No AC Multi-Use
accommodation for watercraft, but which (non-
isavailable for use by more than two commercial)
adjoining lot owners (examples include
fishing piers, homeowner association
iers, rivate club iers, etc.).
An EA is required for all proposed multi-use facilities, regardless of category, that are located wholly or partly
within the shoreline Conservation Zane, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP, Appendix D).
For subdivisions and commercial enterprises, Yadkin will aggregate all proposed multi-use facilities, except for
planned individual and shared piers, to determine the total number of watercraft that the facilities can accommodate.
If, considered in the aggregate, the proposed multi-use facilities can accommodate more than 10 watercraft, then
collectively the multi-use facilities will require prior FERC approval. lf, considered in the aggregate, the facilities
can accommodate ] 0 or fewer watercraft, then the multi-use facilities will be permitted on an individual basis as
shown above.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 9 of 23

5. A multi-use facility permittee planning any modification of an existing multi-use facility must first
notify Yadkin, and Yadkin will determine prior F"ERC notice or approval requirements and EA or
Agency Consultation Process requirements, and whether an amendment to the existing multi-use
permit is required.
6. Multi-Use facility construction and operating permits will be issued only to the adjoining property
owner who will benefit from or be serviced by the proposed multi-use facilities. However, the
adjoining property owner may designate a "contact agent" who has authority to act on behalf of the
owner in any discussions with Yadkin.
7. In any instance in which a governmental body operates a facility with any other entity (except Yadkin),
a multi-use permit will be issued jointly to the governmental body and all such entities acting in
conjunction with the governmental body. The governmental body and all such entities will be jointly
and severally responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of the permit.
8. The multi-use facility perrnittee(s) is solely responsible for operating and maintaining the permitted
facilities in compliance with all terms and conditions of the permit, the Shoreline Stewardship Policy,
all applicable Yadkin procedures and requirements, and all applicable local, State, and federal laws.
The permittee(s) will indemnify and hold harmless Yadkin, Alcoa, and their successors and assigns
from any personal injury, property damage, losses of or damage to natural resources or the
environment, or other liability resulting from the petmittee's operation of the facilities or the
permittee's failure to comply with any applicable local, State, or federal laws, as is set forth in more
detail in the multi-use permit.
9. A four-part process is utilized for the issuance of a permit for new multi-use facility construction and
the amendment of a multi-use permit. T'he four parts are: 1)pre-application meeting; 2) application
development; 3) construction permit; and 4) multi-use facility operating permit. Each is described
below.
B. Pre-Application Meeting
1. Anyone seeking amulti-use facility construction permit must meet with Yadkin prior to submitting an
application for amulti-use facility permit. This initial meeting should be held as early as possible in
the planning process to avoid confusion and delay in preparing information required for the
application.
2. Prior to the meeting, the applicant must complete aPre-Application Meeting Worksheet that identifies
the information that the applicant is expected to bring to the meeting including:
a. Maps or sketches showing the location of the proposed facilities with respect to the reservoir
shoreline and existing property boundaries;
b. General information on the proposed facilities including:
i) the number, type and size of facilities involved, including as estimate of the number of
watercraft the facilities can accommodate;
ii) the anticipated need for access to Project lands or waters;
iii) the anticipated need for use of or access across the Yadkin-Managed Buffer or other Yadkin-
Managed Lands;
c. A proposed schedule for submitting the application and constructing the proposed facilities;
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 10 of 23

d. The name, address, and phone number of a Professional Engineer that the applicant proposes to
certify the proposed multi-use facilities;
e. The name, address, and phone number of the environmental professionals} that the applicant
proposes to conduct the required EA.
3. At the pre-application meeting, Yadkin will review the information on the proposed multi-use facilities
for consistency with the Stewardship Policy and other applicable requirements, review the
requirements for completing the multi-use facility permitting process including the EA, provide notice
of its insurance requirements and provide a list of reviewing agencies.
C. Construction Permit Process
1. An applicant seeking amulti-use facility construction permit must prepare amulti-use facility
construction permit application and receive a construction permit from Yadkin prior to beginning
construction of new facilities or modification of existing multi-use facilities.
2. As part of the application, the applicant must prepare and submit an EA or an Agency Consultation
Process package for the proposed facilities.
a. An EA must be prepared and filed with Yadkin for construction of any new multi-use facility, and
may be required for modification of an existing multi-use facility, that is designed to accommodate
more than 10 watercraft or that is located wholly or partly within the shoreline Conservation Zone,
as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP, Appendix D).
b. In the case of new subdivisions and commercial enterprises, Yadkin will aggregate all proposed
multi-use facilities to determine the total number of watercraft that the proposed facilities can
accommodate. If, considered in the aggregate, the facilities can accommodate more than 10
watercraft, then an EA will be required for that subdivision, regardless of the number of lots
involved, or for the commercial enterprise, as the case may be.
3. Applicants for all other types of multi-use facilities are required to complete the Agency Consultation
Process described in Section VI of this document.
4. The EA must be prepared by a qualified environmental professional or consulting firm.
5. A complete application for amulti-use facility construction permit must include:
a. An Application Checklist;
A map of the proposed development site showing all existing and proposed facilities. The map
must also clearly indicate the location of the Yadkin Managed-Buffer or other Yadkin-
Managed Lands located along the shoreline or adjoining the proposed facilities. (Such a map
should be included in the EA);
Construction plans or detailed drawings of the proposed facilities, at a scale of 1:2,400 (I inch
= 200 feet) or larger;
d. Certification by an approved registered Professional Engineer that the proposed facilities and
any changes to existing facilities are safe and structurally sound;
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page I 1 of 23

e. A complete Environmental Assessment (EA) or completed Agency Consultation Process
package; .
£ Copies of all necessary county, State and federal permits required for the proposed facility;
g. Anon-refundable construction permit application fee in accordance with the Yadkin's current
multi-use facility application fee schedule.
6. Yadkin will review the application for completeness. If Yadkin finds the application to be incomplete,
it may request additional information from the applicant.
7. Upon finding that an application is complete, Yadkin will determine the applicable FERC notice or
approval requirements. For all new multi-use facilities that require prior FERC notice or approval,
Yadkin will provide notice to or file a request with FERC for approval of the proposed facility. The
decision on whether proposed new facilities or modification of existing permitted facilities require
prior FERC notice or approval will be made solely by Yadkin on a case-by-case basis. If prior FERC
approval is required, the applicant should anticipate at least a 90-day review period by FERC.
D. Construction Permit Approval Criteria and Provisions
1. Yadkin will determine whether to issue amulti-use facility construction permit based on its review of
the application package and, where applicable, FERC's response to the prior notice or Yadkin's
request for prior approval. Yadkin's determination will be based, in part, on the following criteria:
a. Proposed facilities meet the following specifications:
i) Proposed facilities will generally not encroach or extend into Project waters moc•e than 1/4 of
the distance to the opposite shoreline or more than 120 feet into Project waters, whichever is
less; and in no case will proposed facilities extend further into the water than is necessary to
achieve the intended use;
ii) Proposed facilities will meet Yadkin's minimum water depth requirements (8-foot minimum
water depth at normal full-pool elevation) such that the minimum water depth is available to
all proposed slips or along all portions of the facilities intended for docking watercraft;
b. Piers, boat docks, and marinas incorporate the use of floating sections such that the facilities will
remain functional under normal fluctuations in reservoir water levels that occur during the
recreation season;
c. Proposed facilities are otherwise consistent with Yadkin's policies for shoreline development and
will adequately meet their intended purpose;
d. The proposed multi-use facilities will not adversely impact the reservoir and shoreline
environment, or the developer has proposed measures to adequately mitigate any adverse
environmental impacts;
e. The proposed multi-use facilities will not adversely impact any significant cultural resources
located in the reservoirs or along its shoreline, or the developer has proposed measures to
adequately mitigate any adverse impacts to cultural resources;
f. The proposed facilities adequately address safety impacts and will not unduly impede or restrict
public use of, or access to, the Project reservoirs;
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 12 of 23

g. Proposed facilities have been reviewed by federal and State resource agencies and the reviewing
agencies have indicated that they have no concerns, or that their concerns have been adequately
addressed by the applicant;
h. Proposed facilities providing for the sale of petroleum products will, at a minimum, comply with
all applicable federal, State, and local regulations and will he installed to ensure that adverse
environmental and safety impacts are avoided;
In the case of proposed facilities that require prior FERC notice or approval, Yadkin finds
acceptable arty requirements or conditions imposed by FERC.
j. The developer has provided Yadkin with a certificate of insurance evidencing that it carries
insurance in the amount and form required by Yadkin.
2. Yadkin reserves the right to make case-by-case determinations in situations that are not explicitly
covered by these Procedures.
3. When issued, the multi-use facility construction permit will be mailed to the applicant. If the
application is denied, a written statement will be mailed to the applicant stating the reasons for denial.
An applicant may reapply for amulti-use facility construction permit at any time. An applicant can
also request a meeting with Yadkin to discuss the reasons for application denial and steps, if any, that
the applicant may take to improve the application.
Upon receipt of the construction permit, the applicant must secure a county building permit.
Construction may not begin until Yadkin has received from the applicant a copy of the approved
county building permit.
Approved new construction, or modification of existing multi-use facilities, must be completed within
18 months from the issuance of the construction permit or within such other time frame as may be
stated in the construction permit.
6. An extension of time, not to exceed 1 year, may be granted at Yadkin's discretion in response to a
written request from the permittee, including justification for the requested extension.
7. Yadkin reserves the right to modify a construction permit to include additional or modified standards
and requirements at the time of the permit extension, if the applicable standards and requirements have
been modified since the issuance of the original construction permit.
8. The permittee must notify Yadkin when construction is completed.
E. Multi-Use Facility Operating Permit
1. Yadkin will enter into amulti-use facility operating permit with the applicant for new or modified
facilities when the following requirements have been met:
a. Final inspection -Upon completion of construction, Yadkin will schedule and conduct a final
inspection to ensure that the facilities are constructed in conformance with the construction permit.
b. Permit fee -Payment of applicable annual operating permit fees, which vary based on the type
and number of facilities, use of the facilities, and ownership (a current fee schedule can be
obtained from Yadkin).
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 13 of 23

c. Proof of insurance
i) All multi-use facilities must carry comprehensive general liability insurance for personal
injury and property damage and other insurance required by Yadkin in an amount and
with terms satisfactory to Yadkin. Such insurance must be primary and must name Yadkin and
Alcoa as additional insureds. A multi-use facilities' owner or operator must provide to
Yadkin, on an annual basis, a certificate evidencing the insurance required by Yadkin and
proof that all premiums on the policy are paid and up to date.
ii) Any governmental body desiring to constnrct, maintain, and otherwise operate amulti-use
facility must obtain and maintain for the facility comprehensive general liability insurance for
personal injury and property damage and other insurance required by Yadkin in an
amount and with terms satisfactory to Yadkin. Such insurance must be primary and must
name Yadkin and Alcoa as additional insureds, and must insure Yadkin and Alcoa against any
acts and omissions of any governmental employee, agent, or contract employee (collectively
"employees"). The governmental multi-use facility must also provide, on an annual basis, a
certificate evidencing the insurance required by Yadkin and proof that all premiums on the
policy are paid and up to date. In instances in which a governmental body operates amulti-use
facility in conjunction with another governmental body or any other entity as co-permittee(s)
(except Yadkin), this insurance may be obtained by any of the co-permittees and must conform
to the conditions described above.
2. All of the requirements for the issuance of amulti-use operating permit must be met within 90 days of
completion of construction, and no operating permit will be issued absent written proof of the
requirements specified in this Section III.E.I.c.
If a multi-use facility operating permit is not renewed, lapses, or is terminated, closure of the multi-use
facility is required at the permittee's sole expense, and the permittee, at its sole expense, must remove
any and all structures, equipment, appurtenances, and any other materials associated with the facilities,
and restore the Project lands and water or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer to their original condition.
Yadkin may also undertake other enforcement as detailed in Section VII, below.
F. Annual Fees
Multi-Use operating permit fees will be paid to Yadkin annually in accordance with Yadkin's current fee
schedule.
G. Permit Renewal or Termination
1. A multi-use operating permit must be renewed every 5 years. Yadkin will notify the permittee of the
upcoming permit expiration date.
In order to renew amulti-use facility operating permit, (i) the permittee must have complied with the
permit, (ii) all fee payments must be up to date, (iii) the permittee must provide a certificate of
insurance evidencing that the permittee carries insurance in the amount and form required by
Yadkin and (iv) the permittee must provide Yadkin with certification from a registered Professional
Engineer that all permitted facilities are in good repair, stnrcturally sound, and in compliance with all
applicable county, State, and federal requirements.
3. A multi-use operating permit may be terminated by Yadkin in accordance with its terms and as
provided in Section VII below.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 14 of'23

H. Multi-iJse Permit Transfers
1. Multi-Use facility operating permits are not automatically transferable.
Prior to the sale or transfer of multi-use facilities, the current property owner (seller) or seller's agent
must contact Yadkin to request a permit transfer. Upon request, Yadkin will arrange a site visit. If
Yadkin finds (i) the seller has complied with the permit, the Stewardship Policy, and all other
applicable Yadkin procedures and requirements, (ii) all fee payments are up to date, and (iii) a
registered Professional Engineer has determined that all permitted facilities are in good repair,
structurally sound, and in compliance with all applicable county, State, and federal requirements,
Yadkin will provide the seller or the seller's agent with a form to request transfer of the permit.
3. The buyer must pay a transfer fee, in accordance with Yadkin's current fee schedule, and provide
Yadkin with proof of insurance for the multi-use facilities, as described in Section IfI.E.I .c of these
Procedures, at which time Yadkin will provide to the buyer a new multi-use facility permit that must
be completed and signed by the buyer at the time of closing.
4. If facilities are deemed not transferable at the time of inspection, Yadkin will provide the seller or the
seller's agent with a written description of repairs [up to and including replacement of the existing
structure(s)], and other actions that must be undertaken before the facilities will be transferable. A
written construction permit must be obtained from Yadkin prior to undertaking such repairs.
I. Existing Multi-Use Facilities
Yadkin may at tunes be aware of existing multi-use facilities that have not previously been issued a
multi-use facility operating permit. Yadkin will provide written notice to the owner of the unpermitted
facilities of the need to submit an application for amulti-use facility operating permit in accordance
with these Procedures. In general, the owner will be responsible for submitting items b, c, d, f, and g
as described in Section III.C.S. Generally, an EA will not be required for facilities existing prior to
July 1, 1999. However, existing facilities will be reviewed by Yadkin to ensure their general
compliance with the Stewardship Policy, and consultation with State and federal resource agencies
may be required.
2. Yadkin will inspect the facilities, determine the adequacy of the information provided, and determine
the applicability of any FERC notice or approval. Upon receipt of any required FERC approval,
payment of the annual permitting fee, if applicable, and satisfaction of the insurance requirements
listed in Section III.E. l.c, above, Yadkin will issue amulti-use facility operating pernrit for the
facilities.
3. Modification of existing multi-use facilities must be approved pursuant to the standard four-part
permitting process described in Section III.B-E, above.
IV. INDUSTRIAL USES/FACILITIES
Uses or facilities other than those related to recreation and adjoining property owner access to the Project
are generally considered industrial uses. All industrial uses/facilities of or on Project lands and waters, the
Yadkin-Managed Buffer, or Yadkin-Managed Lands require Yadkin's prior written permission. Depending
upon the proposed use/facility, under its FERC license Yadkin is required to seek prior approval from
FERC or provide FERC with 45 days notice before approving the proposed industrial use/facility. In some
cases, Yadkin can authorize a proposed industrial use/facility without prior FERC notice or approval but
must report such authorizations to FERC annually. Table 2 summarizes the types of industrial
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Ilse Facility Permirting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 15 of 23

uses/facilities that Yadkin may approve without prior FERC notice, those that require a 45-day prior notice
to FERC, and those that require prior FERC approval. Table 2 also indicates EA and Agency Consultation
Process requirements for various types of industrial uses/facilities.
Table 2
Prior FERC Notice Requirements for Proposed Industrial Uses/Facilities
Yadkin FERC FERC Prior Yadkin Yadkin
Written Annual 45-Day FERC EA Agency
Permission Report Prior Approval Required Consultation
Required Notice Process
Re uired
Replacement, maintenance, or ~ ~ ~
expansion of existing bridges and
roads _
New bridges or roads ~ ~ ~
Minor access roads ~ ~ ~
Storm drains and water mains ~ ~ ~
Sewers that do NOT discharge to ~ ~ ~
Project waters
Sewer or effluent lines that DO ~ ~ ~
dischar a directl into Project waters
Other pipelines that cross project ~ ~ ~
lands or waters but do NOT discharge
to Project waters
Non-project transmission lines/cables ~ ~ ~
with NO support structure in Project
Bounda •
Non-project overhead transmission ~ ~ ~
lines/cable WITH support structure in
Project Bounda
Major distribution cables (submarine, ~ ~ ~
under round or overhead)

Water intake or pumping facilities <1
~
~ _
~
m d
Water intakes >1 mgd (including ~ ~ ~
irri ation s stems)
~ An EA is required for all proposed industrial uses/facilities, regardless of category, that are located wholly or partly
within the shoreline Conservation Zone, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP, Appendix D).
Yadkin requires developers of all proposed industrial uses/facilities that require prior FERC approval to
prepare and submit an EA as part of its request to Yadkin for permission to use/occupy Project lands and
waters or the Yadkin-Managed Buffer. In addition, an EA is required for all proposed industrial
uses/facilities located wholly are partly within the shoreline Conservation Zone, as delineated in Yadkin's
Shoreline Management Plan (SMP, Appendix D). Developers of all other proposed industrial
uses/facilities must conduct an Agency Consultation Process. Both the EA and Agency Consultation
Process are outlined below. In addition, there may be other process/approval requirements from State
agencies and local governments.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 16 of 23

V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATIONS
The Environmental Assessment (EA) must examine resources and potential impacts to Project waters and
lands along the shoreline within 100 feet of the normal full-pool elevation of the reservoir.
Specific information requirements of the EA are outlined below. Most EA requirements apply to
subdivision access, multi-use facilities, and industrial uses/facilities, although some EA requirements are
specific to one type or another and are so identified. Developers of subdivisions that also include one or
more proposed multi-use facilities must provide all information required for both proposed subdivision
access and multi~~use facilities. In the case of modification of existing facilities, the EA must address the
impact of the proposed modification
A. Proposal
I: General Description - a detailed description of the proposed subdivision, multi-use facilities, or
industrial uses/facilities, including maps illustrating boundaries of the subdivision property or
facilities, proposed lot lines, and the placement of structures in relation to existing property boundaries
and the reservoir shoreline. Maps must clearly indicate the location of any Yadkin-Managed Buffer or
other Yadkin-Managed Lands adjoining the site of the proposed subdivision or facility. In the case of
subdivisions, the EA must also contain the following specific information:
a. A map of the subdivision showing all proposed private lots, as well as any lots to be used as
common areas. Each lot should be clearly identified with an individual lot number, and the map
must clearly indicate any Yadkin-Managed Buffer or adjacent Yadkin-Managed Lands.
b. A list or map showing lots that are proposed for private, shared (for two adjoining lots), or multi-
use facilities (group piers, launches, etc.), or other facilities that require a permit from Yadkin.
c. The shoreline width of each lot adjacent to the Project reservoir as measured at normal full-pool
elevation of the reservoir (655-foot contour at High Rock, 541.1-foot contour at Narrows)'. Lot
width in areas where there is Yadkin-Managed Buffer should be measured by extending the side
lot lines to the normal full-pool elevation of the reservoir.
d. The water depth at normal full-pool elevation near the center of each lot adjacent to the reservoir
at a distance of 75 feet from the shoreline.
e. A reasonable site plan for each lot adjacent to the reservoir shoreline illustrating how Yadkin's
requirement fora 100-foot forested setback will be achieved (see the Stewardship Policy).
2. Purpose - a description of the purpose and need for the proposed subdivision or facilities or
modification of existing facilities.
3. Shoreline Impact - a description of the amount and type of impact on the reservoir and the shoreline
within 100 feet of the normal full-pool elevation of the reservoir.
4. Required Permits - a listing of all federal, State, and local permits/approvals that will be required.
3 All contour elevations are Yadkin datum.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 17 of 23

5. Shoreline Development Restrictions - a description of any State or local development restrictions that
apply to the proposed subdivision or facilities, including any county ordinances, watershed protection,
buffer zone, or setback requirements.
6. Building Setback - a description of how the developer proposes to meet or exceed Yadkin's 100-foot
forested setback requirement. In order for lots in a subdivision to be eligible for a private pier or to be
granted other access or activity permits, Yadkin requires a 100-foot forested setback from the reservoir
for all new structures (including but not limited to buildings, houses, driveways, roof overhangs, decks,
porches, patios, cantilevered decks, stairs, posts, columns, fences, retaining walls, landscaping walls,
and gazebos). (See the Stewardship Policy.) For subdivisions, the EA must indicate how setback and
forested area requirements for property owners will be enforced (e.g., restrictive covenants, deed
restrictions, etc.).
B. Existing Environment
1. Existing Shoreline Characteristics - a description of the shoreline and adjoining land area within 100
feet of the normal full-pool reservoir elevation, including a general description of existing land use and
condition, shoreline topography, shoreline vegetation, and other notable features.
2. Existing Reservoir Characteristics - a description of the reservoir area adjacent to the proposed
subdivision or facilities, including a detailed map of water depths within 75 feet of the shoreline, the
slope of the reservoir bottom, a description of the reservoir substrate, and a description of any reservoir
features including the presence of any aquatic vegetation and lap trees.
3. Existing Reservoir Access/Facilities - a description of any existing access to the reservoir such as
pathways, piers, or boat launches on the property proposed for the subdivision or facilities.
4. Designation as Conservation Zone - an estimate of the portion of the proposed subdivision or
facilities that would fall within the Conservation Zone as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline
Management Plan (SMP, Appendix D).
C. Environmental Impacts and Proposed Mitigation
Environmental Impacts - a detailed assessment of the potential impact on the reservoir and the land
area along the shoreline within 100 feet of the normal full-pool reservoir elevation. This section must
at a minimum consider the following effects:
a. Change in shoreline land use.
b. Impact of completed subdivision or facilities on the reservoir shoreline.
c. Impact on shoreline vegetation and plant communities.
d. Impact on shoreline wildlife and wildlife habitat.
e. Impact on the reservoir as habitat for fish and other aquatic life.
f. Impact on wetlands and areas of aquatic vegetation.
g. Impact on reservoir water quality, including the potential for increased sedimentation and nonpoint
source pollution from runoff.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 18 of 23

2. Recreation Use Impacts - an assessment of the increase in recreation use of the reservoir and
reservoir shoreline resulting from the proposed subdivision or facilities, or modification, and the
effects of increased use on the reservoir and shoreline. This section must consider the following:
a. An estimate of resulting increased boating and/or other water-related recreation use.
b. An assessment of the effects that the increased recreation use will have on the reservoir and the
reservoir shoreline.
Mitigation Proposals - a description of any measures proposed by the developer to avoid, reduce, or
mitigate impacts to the reservoir and reservoir shoreline that are expected to occur as a result of the
proposed or modified/expanded subdivision or facilities. This section should also include a discussion
of any measures proposed to address concerns raised by federal or State resource agencies. For a
subdivision or facilities wholly or partly within the shoreline Conservation Zone (as delineated in
Yadkin's SMP, Appendix D), the EA should emphasize mitigation of adverse effects on the important
natural resources found in the Conservation Zone.
D. Cultural Resource Evaluation
1. For proposed facilities or subdivisions located wholly or partly within High or Medium cultural
resource probability zones, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan, (SMP, Appendix
C), a cultural resource evaluation will also be required as part of the EA.
2. The cultural resource evaluation requires an assessment of potential impacts to cultural resources
located along the shoreline within i00 feet of the normal full-pool reservoir elevation.
3. In cases where a cultural resource survey must be conducted, applicants must submit the following
information to the agencies as part of their information submittal:
a. The results of a survey conducted by a professional archaeologist indicating the location of any
significant historic/prehistoric cultural sites in the area that are along the shoreline within 100 feet
of the normal full-pool reservoir elevation.
b. A description of potential impacts to cultural resources resulting from the proposed subdivision or
facilities.
c. The developer's proposal for avoiding or mitigating anticipated impacts to cultural resources.
E. Agency Consultation
The EA must include a record demonstrating that the developer has consulted with federal, State, and
county resource agencies and has received agency comments indicating their satisfaction with the
proposal. Yadkin will provide the applicant with a list of reviewing agencies. At a minimum, this
section must include the following:
1. A list of all resource agencies consulted.
2. Copies of any correspondence between the consulted agencies and the developer.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 19 of 23

Copies of letters from consulted resource agencies indicating that they have reviewed the proposed
subdivision or facilities or modification and that they have no concerns, or that their concerns have
been adequately addressed by the developer.
F. Applicant Information
1. Name, address, and phone number(s) of the applicant, along with a brief description of the background
and qualifications of the applicant in terms of type of business experience, and where registered or
licensed.
2. A brief description of the background and qualifications of any/all firms that assisted in the
preparation of the EA.
VI. AGENCY CONSULTATION PROCESS
A. General
Certain types of smaller subdivisions, multi-use facilities, and industrial uses/facilities that are not located
in the shoreline Conservation Zone, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP,
Appendix D), are not required to complete an EA but are required to conduct the Agency Consultation
Process described below.
The applicant must prepare a package of information for submission to State and federal resource agencies
for their review and comment. Yadkin will provide the applicant with a list of the reviewing agencies.
The information package must include the following basic information. In the case of modification of
existing facilities, the information package must focus on the proposed modification.
B. Information Package
I . Cover Letter - a cover letter similar to the attached, providing the agency with basic information
regarding the proposed subdivision access or facilities.
Description - a brief description of the proposed subdivision or facilities or modification, including
maps illustrating boundaries of the subdivision property or facilities, proposed lot lines, and the
placement of structures in relation to property boundaries and the reservoir shoreline. Maps should
clearly indicate the location of any Yadkin-Managed Buffer or adjacent Yadkin-Managed Lands. In
the case of subdivisions, the developer should also include (i) a copy of the subdivision plat that will
be filed with the county, (ii) a description of the anticipated desires of individual property owners for
reservoir access and individual access facilities (piers), and (iii) a description of provisions for joint or
common access to the reservoir, including any multi-use facilities proposed.
3. Shoreline Impact - a brief description of the anticipated impact on the reservoir and the shoreline
within 100 feet of the.normal full-pool elevation of the reservoir.
4. Required Permits - a list of all federal, State, and local permits/approvals that will be required.
5. Shoreline Development Restrictions - a description of any State or local development restrictions that
apply to the proposed subdivision or facilities, such as any watershed protection, buffer zone or
setback requirements and including any provisions of Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan such as
the 100-foot forested setback from the reservoir shoreline that apply to the proposed subdivision or
facilities.
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 20 of 23

„ ~
6. Applicant Information -Name, address, and phone number of the applicant, and a brief description of
the background of the applicant.
C. Cultural Resource Evaluation
1. For proposed subdivisions or facilities located wholly or partly within High or Medium cultural
resource probability zones, as delineated in Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan (SMP, Appendix C),
a cultural resource evaluation will also be required as part of the Agency Consultation Process.
2. The cultural resource evaluation requires an assessment of potential impacts to cultural resources
located along the shoreline within 100 feet of the normal full-pool reservoir elevation.
3. In cases where a cultural resource survey must be conducted, applicants must submit t}re following
information to the agencies as part of their information package described in VI.B, above:
a. The results of a survey conducted by a professional archaeologist indicating the location of any
significant historic/prehistoric cultural sites in the proposed development area that are along the
shoreline within 100 feet of the normal fiill-pool reservoir elevation.
b. A description of potential impacts to cultural resources resulting from the proposed subdivision or
facilities.
c. The applicant's proposal for avoiding or mitigating anticipated impacts to cultural resources.
D. Submission of Information to Agencies.
1. The complete information package must be sent to the following agencies for their review and
comment before being submitted to Yadkin. A sample cover letter for use in submitting the
information package to the agencies is attached.
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
c. North Carolina State Clearinghouse
d. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
g. North Carolina Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation
VII. ENFORCEMENT
A. One of the underlying goals of these Procedures is to protect and enhance the natural, environmental,
cultural and scenic resources within the Project Boundary and on the adjoining lands. Yadkin's highest
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 21 of 23

priority is to preserve the natural character of the shoreline as it exists today, and this is reflected in the
procedures and requirements of these Procedures as well as the Stewardship Policy. Yadkin believes
that most adjoining property owners and developers appreciate the beauty and importance of a natural
shoreline and will comply with these Procedures. In those instances where violations of these
Procedures occur, however, Yadkin will consider those violations as serious matter's. Violations of
these Procedures include: (i) any failure to comply with the provisions of these Procedures, the
Stewardship Policy, or other applicable Yadkin procedures or requirements; and (ii) failure to obtain
or to comply with written permission from Yadkin, where required, before undertaking construction or
other activities.
B. The primary sanctions for violations of these Procedures are loss of eligibility for: (i) a multi-use
facility permit within the Project Boundary (i.e. on a reservoir) or subdivision reservoir access
approval or industrial use/facility approval; and (ii) use of, or access to the Project lands and waters
across, the Yadkin-Managed Buffer. Yadkin will also require corrective action including but not
lirnited to restoration and/or mitigation. Eligibility may be reinstated only where adequate restoration
and/or mitigation is undertaken and Yadkin determines that reinstatement of eligibility is otherwise
consistent with the underlying goals reflected in these Procedures, the Stewardship Policy, and
Yadkin's Shoreline Management Plan. Yadkin, as it deems appropriate, will consult with federal and
State regulatory agencies in determining adequate restoration and/or mitigation measures.
C. In addition, in the event of a violation of these Procedures, Yadkin, at its sole option, has the right to:
(i) terminate any existing multi-use facility, industrial or other permits, requiring closure of the facility
at the adjoining property owner's (or developer's) sole expense, revoke any subdivision reservoir
access approval previously given to the developer if the developer is responsible for the violation, and
terminate any industrial approval or rights granted; and (ii) erect a barrier along the Project Boundary
or across the Yadkin-Managed Buffer to restrict access to the Project lands and waters; and (iii)
require, at the adjoining property owner's (or the developer's) sole expense, (a) removal of any multi-
use facilities and any pathways or other facilities and structures located within the Project Boundary or
on the Yadkin-Managed Buffer, and (b) restoration and/or mitigation, up to and including restoring
Project lands and waters and the Yadkin-Managed Buffer to their original condition. In addition, if the
adjoining property owner (or the developer) fails to take the required action after notice from Yadkin,
Yadkin will consider any facilities or structures remaining within the Project Boundary or the Yadkin-
Managed Buffer as a trespass upon its property, and reserves the right to, at the adjoining property
owner's or the developer's sole expense, remove the facilities or structures, treat them as its own
property without any liability to the adjoining property owner or the developer for payment, and
perform the required restoration and/or mitigation. Yadkin also may pursue any other rights or
remedies, including damages, it may have in any permit, or at law or in equity.
VIII. ATTACHMENTS
1. Sample Agency Consultation Letter
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 22 of 23

CTTACHMENT 1
Sample Cover Letter for Agency Consultation Package
Date
Agency Address
Agency Address
Agency Address
Dear
Enclosed is package of information outlining a proposed development located along the shoreline
of the (Narrows or High Rock) Reservoir which is operated by the Yadkin Division of Alcoa
Power Generating Inc., as part of the Yadkin Hydropower Project (FERC No. 2197). Yadkin
requires that developers of smaller projects consult with federal and state resource agencies
regarding their proposed development.
Enclosed is some basic infonnation about the project being proposed. Please provide to me any
written comments on this proposal within thirty (30) days. Agency comments will be forwarded to
Yadkin as part of our application for approval of the proposed development. Yadkin will consider
agency comments in evaluating and approving the proposal.
Thank you for your review.
Sincerely,
Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures -Page 23 of 23

N

'
~
O
~
~ -
r
(
1
=
r
2 I ____~_,_
~.. _-- .
___ ~
' -
N
2 y,
p ~ 9' +~' 4' i -
~ c5 ° !n
~ ~
~ .~' G
~

~ :~
'F
s
o ~,

m --.__ _
I

0 y
1 ~
~I -
~
o $ S!1

~.
F~
m "
F _
2
-.
O /B I I
o ~.
nl 1 u
~ '
~~

~
4,
r~,
4•
y
1
+ ~
_
~~ ~
L
i _ ..
~

n ~,l
~
~

~ `' i
r ..

(/1111
O hi
(~
' l;
~~~ r
_ ~_ I
D
Z
4 O ° i
ly U1 {
L R,

s

O o
° , C
~ ° '-_
;=~ i
f I
c g ~
m -_ o
m
~
O _ y
1
,,
L

- ~ ~ o

~.
-
O _~ ~ m
~
O
_ N
'4
.~
~~

~ ~ O
V j m ;.

a
m

N
~sf .a~`a~~~
~ ~ ~
N A
G ~

... m

i ~ ,
P
QOUZ .. y

9~ ~
Tp / ~ -~4~
y
.
/ ~'. ~ ~ ~

,

> /

~~
I D

E
~mO
1
.,
m
A
. ° W I I ~
I ~ rT

I
, ,
...._-r-.--.... o
, , <;...
...
r
o O o ~ 1-„~q 5
~ I i y -tl ~1D .F NPR
G
1 ~„ NG
~ y
~~'ma ~~~
m ~ o I ``
, I
~ v,
p :~
ti
oyT~~ ~Z~ ~ '' ~ ~ m
`2iom~ *W~ ~ ~ ~ N
~N
`~
°

,..
Z ~
~
1 ~
~
-

g a°s
~
I 1
' tI~ (rO
~ Zm
V r1,~ o
m
~
9 70 O

~ Lp
K
I
. ~.. ~ ~
~ 1
~ O
nl
I
1 y
I. ~
In
~

n

j

i

.
b
c~
.

' n m
m

I . 3
Ifr a
-1 -~
S
~ ~ p m
m ~ DO ~

Z -_ V W r O

•17 m
I

~
PV
1.71
r
n i
7 y r ~ N C
~ O r ,

' p
'` ~ I K

i _ I I ~ N
~ .' ;n ~ I I .. m
ti
n, ~ I , . , p f~,
0
0
III r
' ~
w 1

O ~
IC. ~,~
, C
~
~
~
~ I D

\ ~. lu
~~
I" ~ n
H
\\ ~,
\\ '
~; ~ / ..
_
. __ n
N

_~

.. z :o
c
\ \
~
~ ~.~ \ .
~ +n
~ n
,~
s

-

__._.~ 0
Z

.. _._.
~
., o N _ _

-_

1
`~

x
a z
n
I A
~ '
\e. '
'

~~ r
/
~
~ Rl`~
' --

y

a n
_
d.. //
I ~r
J J C11
~~7!

- _ _
i~ti ~ /~ . v
O C ; ~ ~
~ / 1 I lTl iTl - 01
'
i ~ /
ti `~ z
~~U i j I ci O ?I
`
Z
O
y
m
moz
mmO
m°=~
c~m~
O ~ n
A
00~
~ O D
N ZJ
mom
x
"'ox
nmo
O "iE
ZOZ
-1
31 A O
DmZ
n
~~~
O O =
A ~ N
m
D
-i 1) _
~~m
mN-i
nw
-+~m
~rn0
m D
c
Ocrn
mzm
Z -I
O =
fm
z~
0
~n
xn
N ~
0
f Z
r
s+ K
~ cn cn ~,
' ~~
O
`' ~-'
~
O
:'
f q i - ~ ~ S~
~
In ~
~ ~ •?~ ~~
.y ~~ 1
n
~
In +I ~' ~) - In (1'~ CJ A I
i
`~ y l Cj N y > mWO ,I
Ti
~ i -77
_t
I 1U
U7 °
m < p o
mmN ~ ~
~7

(n+a ~
iTi ~..
I ~.)
C'~ r
O O Z7 O
\ O
Z ~ ~
,1
O -i _O ~
m O
\ D. n
0 l
~ ~` ~' ~ N~ii RI ~ ' s O ~ m C M~1
_
O 'A O ~
Q 3 L~ _ 0~. r fv
~ Z
~ ~ p z
O ~
a --- + m Z
°O ~-- _'__- - ~ ~ fll
r ,
____ - IN ~i
n __ _,
_ ~
~

t o
~
°,
~~

4

r
W
c r
m
i

\ a
vR
~~ _
H
O
rn
->I
n
0
~ „
~

O ~
omr
D
~m
2 L
W
• _
~m
A
y
c v T ~ n
=
z
v
om~~
o ~
~ ~ x IIIIJJJIIf1... v
- Nr

~ a
m
~
~ , n
u ~
+ 5 mC
c ~
~~ A(r
~a-

oN r~
dm-
a
r
°
~ ~ ~ te
,
> ~ 0 ~ o a
v n
m ~
~ ^ ICI
» I I°

o m z=
~~ ~ x
uoo ~
r T
' --
~r
~~
~ zf
8~ Z<
~e m ~°
~z ~~
2
jJ o
n
~~ 3
3r zd
Z ~ ~
z ~~
to n

to ~ ~ 4 /0 4 I ~ rv.
~ 6' 6' /
z rn ~ ~ '~~
~ ~ ~ /~
i
i ' ~~~ /~ ~ ~~~
~ N , /. \~ ;
~ ~ `~ ~1 \
-~ /B OI I- ~
O ~'~~
~ ~~ '~'7
y ~ ~ ~ /
I~~ ~/ ~
O ~ 4' / 4' C I I
~CU 6, of 6. ~' I F ~ ~ i
_ ~ /
~ ~ ~~'
e: / ,
~ ~
t l~ D_.._..,
~ ,~
a '~ ~~ ~
', >,
:~
i ,~ ~ ~ /
L~ ~9
/:
~ ~---,~~
._
~ ~~
i .~,/~ ,~
S ~.
_ II ,.. r~~ ~ 1,
.~ .,. /
rl ~
.~. .~- r , 1 ~ ~.
l~
~~ ~ '~ ~ i D
.r/".r \.:. ~o
i n
_ ~
~s ~ ~` ~~ m
I y
I r
. I ~ /~ tnmOZ
' n i. mmmp
r / - Z? m
p F.-' { ~ ~) n~~ ~ ~ ~m2~
n ~ i~ ~ xnm~
". . y ~ ~ ,.
' m
I ~ ` :~ ....,..~._. ~, f. ~ ~~~ ~ O to
• 'j m ~I. ~ ~. _ n~OD b
i n .~ m -~ - --~ T m
'b '' 20+00 ~ ~' m p p x = n n
OI \~~~\ ~ /~ l ~ l: ~I ,/: '..~-.f C~ /~ oD~= ~ a ~e yIl Ito x
~~ ,t ~~ V / Ay~m ~ ° vmX ~L
cc
lam' ~ I r :w /~f .. /~~ ~ n-~~ u~rvQo
ti;mom rT
n
\ / ~ _ / D C
p C N
.it ~ - ~~ ~ ~ppOS
/ ~ ~ / 'i to Z ~ o
J; 1/ / ~ __ / ..~ / Off' Q I m
/ V ~ _ !!!/// gq~
.. l ~~~ ~ _ Nn2D t r ng n
/} ~ C ~~ r •~r 1
p n .m D
l ', ~ ~ ` -_
0
n v ~~. . ~, rift. y`~f^ ~ ~ ~
LJ f ~ ~ m
`, / l_ O Oyy A O
C D • f7 O
/ 1
~- g ~ ~ Cn m
1V ,I ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ !-LI ~ a C" z
~l ~ ~~ l~ ~ ~ '°a ~

r
i
n
0

r
i

y

~ O
~
'~ A
D2

n ~
~o
,~
N C~
i"
I
1
/5 ~;
~ ; o
~o s
>_
. ~ ~
a
o
. ~,
do

o~ ti
~_-

T
o ~
I _
D
r
A
~~
~+
v
oo QsC'

'
~U t m
ti
ti ?
tno~
OyG
8;;
_~
~~

i om
ma
- ~ ~
/
i

..
...

... ~ ,z
um
O
n0 1

/J/
~ N~ r ~
_ =
> ~ ~
o m~ ~
i m
s
° Z ~ /
~ ~ 1 ~
`
~
, "~~ ~ b~ Via.. ~
~
_
~ C~'lp O ~ / f~
n O ~ f

l,a 2 ~ y G~ i
g ° L
n~
_ ~
'_
x ~
m Z u,
m~ o
n
I
+~~
~~

~~~
~ v7 O
~ Z
~g~
:Tg

A
D
K
a
on
~a
~~~
rv A
~D
nm
~ Z
mo
a
c
z
0

~ V A
~
N N N 0
O N
U
o
N
V V ~^
O
N
to ~n
/ _
Z~
p //
` CT
n
~
~ ~ Z
o0
N ~

N N
U~IN
OIO O~

N I
O
O O r
~~
~~
~r
~ ~
~~
~o
~~
~m
~rn
~'rn
m
~i
~rn
~rn
ti ~
U7 ~
~e OCZ
~m ~~u]
t o ~npo
i ~
+ ~
N ~ T T
o "
H ~ '
h
~»
N m ff
+ .
g a
o'
=1 A
m
i n' C
O~~T
Own
nor
Q~
"nC
_z
' O ~~
T o ~5
0
+ ~ gg° nC
u ~ im' mfT
i - ~~_
o' ~n
~a ~
P u ~<
H mom
+ m '
oic ~I ~
8a og x
=1 OA to 4 O
D
S=
1-
r ~ v o"
~~_
+ ~ p
8 ~ _ ~
p ~ ~c -1
n
t ti o oo" a ~
N
m v oZ TI
• 0'~
~ O Z C
N ~
p ~ O
~ O p

b
S o

I K

~ r
[t7
Zr
~ ~ ~~ ~ of
`-" f
~ =
~z
~ i
o
~
~~
~r z

i ~
z ~
~
m~
~
~F
~ AN

`,
~1
~,,i
~'
~l
i ~,---
~~, '
~,
i~
n_. -~
` `Z/
j~//
/ //
~~
~, '~ ~~
- =p~
r ~ ~ ~ "~aF
/ ~ ~ 1\~, /` o~~
~.~
-/ v ~ o
-~ ~
~~ //,
,~
~ ~ -
. .I~ ~~~
~ k ~ ~
--~ ~__/
~~~.
. ~~:

/_
i

~~
Np•D 8yg5 ': ~@
GRID °
N~ U
o ,ti
o~ °~-
rr ~ ~ f
-.' GiC
} + '^ ~
Uo u L ~'"
y ~ d
=1
`~i ~h
r ~ -i a
KO Z ,- ~ vL; ~'~
Te l /// ~ _
11 0
O ~ ~;~
~.
~ ,, o 0
~; ~ ` ~~9
~ ~
.. ,. ,~ /
' A I ~ ~ ~ ~
n n ~ / ./ ~ o z
..-
~n
i O ~ ~I ~ _ ry J. ~ Q~~~ ~ ~°m vio y ~ B» ~~ -ter
m ~
IV -. I I ~ ~ ~ ~~ mo ~o p 'a~
b a r, ` 1 ~ ~/ ~ mm n-i u~ N N~~
ti i y 1~ L/ ~~ ~ to m tmi~ N m f
-~ O nm nr + p occ ^,I n
I' -~ I. ~^ 1 O ~n ~r o xj x
O ~ '1 ~ ~ ~ m m So `"no
rn -
a ~,
R
1 , .,,
~ ~ n ~ ~_
~ Do< t ~ ~o
A
o r'
o '
...... ~ ~~ mom, x + of q ms
~cmz p o0
/y/;
~ x
OK ~ / ~ ~o ~nOr
~~ / `4 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ g~
~~~ ~ ~..~~ ~ 2 ~ 00
/ / y ~ ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~/ ~ ~ n vi N Z~ ~ ~
~,,
s: ~ ,~ o~
~.~ ~ ~ ,-
..~5 ~ /1 , ~ ~, ~
0
'~ 4 f ~
g Ci7
y~.y Z <
~~ p2
` -A
O
c ra Z yin
~z ~
Z
~-~
0

ar ~~
°z~ ~E
m
~ p~ A

A
I~_ /~~~, / _i._I ~~~h
~1 h~i]~N~7 .j ~~'f-i)I\r_; 403_i-Jy_1 ~1',r~~,J i~.
C011lTRACT: TIP PROJECT.• B-4I03
0 0 -o
~ ~ 7O N -U
70
O 0
o
o
o b

m
' o
i
Z
n
~
2
n
It O O ~ O H O ~
^~~l
~ Z y

D `~7
r
v
I y
° o °o
~
DZ ~~N ~-i
~
rn
~
Gl ~ NN
rt
~
~ S~ n~
C m o u u ii ii u u
T Q
D Zm~ C
r
OAN
NO
~
~ O w VI
Noy
O ~Z ~ ;a~ ~ooy
Z O ~
~ m m
~ Z Z
r- 2 2
m
~ ~ O
c
-~c~
~ ~v ~
O ~ ~ 0
m ~ ~
~O~ n+l
~~~ y
w ~ A
w w
~ ~
ii p II ~
0 0 0
z ~°
~~ `c~
z
~
m m p
I
o G7 ~
~~ off.
°~ ~
°
V t~

Q
6 D

_

~

b~
~
3
.'~ ~ ~ Z a
'~ ~
j N n
= T ~
~
t
b ~
^`3
~
~ 0
Z
~ C
m x r° ~ ~
~
y 7v m ~ m
~
~, I
~
m So
~'i i I
0
r~ ~
~a
N ~
~ ~ a
~ ~ 3
N Vml tm/f
~~
~~
~~
2
~;~
~ z
y O nrr
a` ~
®~
P ~
°7C
'~
4~j i
D
Z
a
i

b
~
y?'~l~-_•sr'r~

N =
7 ~~
a
\7r Gd
\N •i
~~
fi
£~omsv n
f ..t0 2
fgn_m a
[uv N n
x.~=N ~C
i d~-nN ~~
Z mpN P
~^ P n
0
0% a Z
3V ~~
H
>~
u
Z
n
~o
I I
I
~ I
0 ~ ~
~ ' ~_
,
2~ ~~S
N
B
I
~
~ i (~
NA
~
m~ ;-~~
~; i ~~
~ ~ ~ \~ ~

H
~
~-,
~ i
~ -
tiII ~~~.
)
~ ~
~ I
~'
~ ~% 7
I ~
~
~ ~
~
\~~ ~ i
°o ~~ r G1
~~ ~ az ~~
~ ~ ~~
'
~
\\ I Z V pp
~
1
~ O
V
rn
Gl _` ~j J
+ ~ O
~
\ ~ m
1~ i
/,e
J
a
~~
I
I 00 ~ A
~
I
~ O
° ^~+ I
~
ail ~~ ~'7
,
o
~ ~
'
70
O ,~%' a

~

_~~~ _

I

~

i~~ ti
-i
D
-i
-
_, v I
~

~
I ,~-p. ,
.'
/ .' _ N
+
; `
°w ,__~-
,----~
~ r
s

i
~~~ ~
~~ MFR O ~ ~' i
,, pR :~/ i
__
~~
~~ / ~ ~
o~
n
0
~o
r~
4 ~6 /
1~
1
~~
,
,
~M IJ\
~/ E
1 .~' ~ •
1 4t

1 n 6` .. .1..-
' '`~
~~4 / 14~ _ / ~~ ~ i `rs

1 i
~~
; of
,~ ~
,
4
l
~ ~~ .
yv
~~ \
/
1
~ c r
~
~
Y

S e ~s
c ,f
1" ~' 1
a
~ tl
~
r
r 1
~ ~
1 ``
1
~ -
~
4 1 ~~Y M, -a
~
~~ s
4 _ •..
h
O
~ ~
y
0 ~ ~
b
~ ~
S ^z
p ~
~~
~ ~ a
O
b ~~
O
~ Wb b
~a
y
C ~
n
C
'g
8 'ro
sr
..
m~
A !~
~~
°x 'S
Cam"
°z Z
a
'S
~~b
n
0
z
~~
~~
2; ~
~'
rJ.
:i
I ~ ^~
if
v
~,
,==.
~"
'~
WwW.
N ~ a C
~o .o
W N
~p ~~p~p ~~p / ~ ~
N N i 0 ± f
O_ O O 8
.. r ~ ~
~Imll ~

c v ~ ~ p -n ~o ono ~ ~ ~ ~ o s ^ c (1 ~ 0 3 ~ ~ C ~ _~"• ~" ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ -moo ~ m ~ io n c n ~^
N O ° = N O ~: ~.` ~, d fp S O C - w N O N O O O N ~ O O K O ~n ° O
o ~ 7' ° f ~ m ~^ , ° 3 ~ o a 3 ~ 7 °_ - ~ `" ~ ~ v ~ v _« ^ v v ~ v co '~ ~ c C
N 3 ~ ~ , a o 3 ~ ~ ^ o ~• ~ a - ~ 111'...ti... 9 7 0 7' 0 0 0 7• ~ m ~o ~• m ~ r. 7 ~ ~
N "O S O ; C ~ c0 ~O ~ c0 W N ~ t0 \ ~ ~ t0 ~ ° O S '~ r
a b
~ r. c ~. c m W 3 °o ~ 0 ~ '~ 0 ~ ~ ~° 'ti > > o_ ~ a a a ~ ~ 3 f1 ~ r o co ~ ? ~'
Q H ~° E °- o W h ~ <~ a a f~ c n f o c o o~ 7° c m
(D 7' N N ~ ~ , Oa 0 w ^ 7 7 w ° a' C ~ ~ ~ C 3 ~ lp r ~.
~ a 7 ~ W°~ .~ ~~ ~ b
~ ~ W ° ~ ,b
~ n ~ 7 0
S ~ ~ C ~
j j ; ~ ~ ~ b
I ~
V ~ ( ~1 1~ - ~ 'Y ~ N~~ ~ m m ~ x (Nil ~^ fi~
LLLJJJ
1 1 1 i i! I -- i ~ ~ I I l i
7 Q C = 7 7 ~ O ~ ~ X ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ X X, ~ '~ 'O ~ ~ I71 ~ IT1 ~ '9 ~ rTf T W ~ 7O 70 N .'O N 1y
W ^ ° 2 10 f0 ~~~~77 < C ° N• O yl' ~ O O O O ~' ~, O O O O x~' O Y~,C' O O O xy' xN' N 70 70 ~ 7o O 1[~V
~ 7' ° m ° g ~ = v o- v v v v =. 0 -° v v ~v ~ c~'o ~ a v _ = ~ ~ 7
°° °' o° co ~ 3 ° 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 5~~ 0 0 0 0 9 0° 0 0 0 0 0 G~ 4 ^ ~' a
, N N N N H N N N N N N N Vl N 7 7 ~ S
a a r N -~ ~7 ~ ~ ° '° o '° n co co co W '° ~° m m o o '° o '° ~ ° ~ o m '° ~° ~ ~ 3 ° o' a
° S W y ~~ a n a~~ a a a a n a~ n. a a a m a n ., a~ a a A~ °~
co c~ ° m 3 n °c ~ c; o ~ ~ H N c ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ a n o W 70 7. 70 7q t0 ~° u ~ ° 3 ~
c ° ~ m c ~ c ~ coo- m m °, ~ c c ~° ~ ~ ~ °- $ ~ a ~ •" °, °, c ~ °" °' 9 co
~ ~ o o ~ n n ~ N ~ b mo W o o ~ °- °, ~ °. °. °, ~ ~ ., ~ ° i ~?
~ ° ° s ~o ~o H l°n 3 ~ C p p (~ ° ^ m ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ r w ~
° = W ° O T n ~ - C 0 ~ W in r~ r r 7 ~ ~.~i
~ ~ ~ "" "` ~ ~' ° 7° -` to O m ~ I7D t7D O W
d cy m ~ ~ 2 ~. m ,
o f1 H ° 2• ~ mf ~
i I ~ 3 0 0 , s, T
o-
C ~ rt ~ fD ~
~ ~ > ? 3 I
I
I~ ~ i c~ ~~ ~ ~i
Q 3 ~ E~~f ~ ~ ~ ~~~ IT I~ I I C ~ ~ m m in~i C;, • ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~
~ -o c~ ~ m m m I I ~ i~ 9
~ ~ r I I I I i} LLLJJJJ
~ A ~~ W W ~~ m m W 0 ~" rn
O O ~ O fD N W N ~ ~ y
~ a 3 a~ a -~ ~- ~- z ~• $ 7 2
o. ~ cDa ~ c. ~ > > > > a ~ Z
W
a a a ~, m co ° m~~ m
~ W a ° ° W S
~° o
T O W (~ O ~ S O O 7
?1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ O ~ ~ tD
~ ~ ~ •O W ~ _~ A W y
~ T ~ S ~ O O_ N
'~ n 7 fD ~ 1D C W
,^~ H 1° n o f1 a
o f1 ~ n °o-
~ or ~ o_ ~ m =
S O C C O
A W
~ w N
N N C
C C m
-F --r" i ~ I
i
i ~ i
~ I ~ I ~
l i l
m 3
a~~~~ C C C C C N
g ~ ~ > > ; ~ o o_ o_ S
O ^
0 0. 2 ''r ~ o ~~ m ° m
o n W O O ~ N d_ ~ 0
c m o o m• O S •cCn
~ a y' ~ ~ ~ c o; m
.r r x
O 0 _~ ~
C
70
tD
O
a
If(N
1
~$~CC~ ~~~~.
p ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % o x O
H ^ T f ~ f O ~• O N• ~ ~~
i0• ~ p ~ W (,D ~ ~• ~ 3 fil "~1
p ~ 3 O ~ r ~ N fO ~ tQ 70 (~
C'
N , ~
p ~ lD N ~ H O ~ O
p ~ _ ' N ~ O /D
O ~p
f~~p r j O !D
r- ~ a ~
o
m ~
.._K I
0 0° o o v A Z~ W
3 a ~• Q' m a a m m •~~•
° ~ f7 ~
W S o ~ ~ `O W ~
° ~ o ~ ° W ~
O ~ S C = x
o ~ c
N a c
~• W ~
p o ~
°
o ~
~, a ~
00 m
7
a
0
~ ~ ~
I ~ ~~
E
~~
~ I ~ II
p W y ~ N N D
Z D p ~ ~ G1 y p ~° p ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 D p 70 ~ ~ ~ ~
D
~
H ^ O 7 7 0 N ^ ~ ~ fn N A H n Q N n O O ~ ° .
~
~ a W N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 3 < ~ a ~ a
~ c A ~ m ~• a m m ~ ~ o
° a G7 > ~ ~ ~ ~ ° a a• ~ ° ~ w W f ~ m o a s < 3 3
N ~ '~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° W 3 O_ ~ ° W ~ S
N
N O_ N ~ t
E
, ~
m O_ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 O_ ~ ~ I N
C 1D ° T (
T , N n ~ •'• /~ ~ T ~
a ~ ~
d. D r C p r ~ r W
, p
' °- ~ G
W
° ~ A r 0 N r
7 0
~
rt
~
~
° Q
fD
O r
7
r
7
r
_ 7 ~ O ~ ^ iD cD lD 7 • O ~
7 r N _
^ O ~
7 W cD
, C D ~ N
C H
o m ~ co m C
• fD • ~ T
N
C N
m C
•M T
~
n
~ I ~ 7

m m ! ~ ~ o - ~ a ~ ~ a. m ~ ~> ~ o c
II
n
O
z
m
Z
-i
O
Z
D
r
z
rn
rn
t/'1
r
to
oa
~0
ti
~~
~•
r~
F
~r
~~
~~
`.
o
N
u
r~ ~~
V~
i
1
t

.Ut~k
~~ ~eys~~. L-.41~~_ls_Ic_05090b.dgn
-I
n =
r ~ z ~ m
r = o cn
r m~~ o00
z -- n n
z D ~-. -i cn n
m r r<,-,z= mr
n o ~ ° o .-•
~C7 C7 D • • Z N
n o m ~
o WD-i~r~',-, o zo
z m
mm wm oo~OZ=o
~J Z Z ~ p Z C~ Oo C7 m 0
~ ,N„ Z W O w D ~1
rn ;=c~p,._,~o~ocno C
n o 00 0 z ~o --{ ~ •-.
D z ~~ ter,.-~wcn nz
r ~ N m-in
a°'-"~ooaocnom--i
on Nn o--i~ m
n~w~~~~~--~n m
~m~o rn ~.,~-,--a~rcn
~ r N D~ p p ~- Z Z N
O cJ'1 N -i v ~ ~ C m --i / /~
C n = ---i G'7 ~--~ D r~ m V~
mD~n~~cnc~nzzo~ n
o~ ~~~--~ ocnm-ioo ~
N o --~ ~ m
,-.r,~ oz ~,~o ~o<
cnoo,zOw° z~a~~m ~-+
oo om~~c~~--~~zr
z= D o D o
no~°° N~~a o-~-o ~
<~ a c-~wmm
p N W O D~ 6~ O~ ~ ~ C!1 D /-i
00o z wz~~ mm
ooz °°mn ~~Np cno
-i z w ~-- --i ~ z
n ,_,mo°~ooz n
r cn z cn ~o n ~ -~
o ~ -D~m ~_
~ cJ, cn cn cn
cn o m =
-i moo m~
n m-,m p~
z ~ -+, o
~ -~ m ~
m ~ `. ~ m
~ n
O
b
z
y
O

~I
~ p ~b
~' y n
~ ~ y ~
~ ~ ~
y~ ~ b4~
tz ~ rorb
h ~ O y
a "
b y ~ n
y~~z~o
tr1 b ~'
ozb~~
~~~~~
x p "' C
N h ~ ~ C
y~ ~ o ~ `y"
h ~ a~a y C~i~
h b
b
O
b ~ y ~
zo
y ~ ~ y
n
eY
O ~ y x
~° o ~'
z ~ ~ o
y ~ y
y~ ~,
h ~
r~ OO
T
y
O
o~
n
ti
'-l
~~
b ~
r a
°z
o~
y
ao
y y
'y ~
h
ao
'3
b
O
b ~
~x
~~
O
ti n
•~ y
x
x
~x
~ ~
~~ ~
i~ y
O
y ~
ha
~b
b
y
~ ~
r
0
h
~ ~ y
b
n n
y Z
n
y O
o °r a
a
a
yam
~' a
n y
x ~
n
o ~
y
n

O
A Z
a b
ti ~
z
y ~C
l~
"z
c~
I

v
~ I ~
ICI
ICI
r ' ~~
' l
~
1
1 la
4 ' '~
/ l~
o I
~~
!O
i ~~,
1 ~~
J
/ 1~
o
~
1
/ /
~ 1
i
r
l / t
/
/ ~
/ /
1
1 1
~ '
1 ~

Z
I 1
~ n
i
I I o
~'zC~
v
.. ~
m~
J~~
ivwp
oz
o~
~~~ I
~I N !Tl
mCD z
CJ G ii
_~ /
w
I~
/;
i
-~ ,
m
tt

l s /
WdC1~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ __~i~
L ~3~b~ / JI i irk //.
~ ~
i~ i`'i ~ ~
~' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I
~ ~c ~ ~
0 1
i ~~ % j
~ ~~
$ $ ~~ 1
~ ~ ~' 1
a ' / /o
~ ~~ ~~
1=
~~/ j~ ll l
,~c+%/ ~~ 1 I o
/~
I o
,Z~ ~ / / ~' ~_ ~
~~ .~ ; o
/ ~~ ~1 1
~ i^% ~ ~ ~ d
~~ ~ ~ I N
i
~ cl
t~ ,~
1
z
~,
0
r~zc,
~~~
wNo
wo,z
~wC
~ ~ S
N ~ IT1
6~r~ Z
~ ~ -i
m-~
0
~~
W
r~

i

On
/ ~o
l' r - rf

1
~~~
T
~,
„.~,
~,
,T;
c n~~
~~~ ..~
r,m
~ j>
~tf)
fTl;~l
~~~:~
~.~ r~
T. I' _~
~, ,
r-
r-: n, ,
.~ - ~;
.~ ~ fir,
°' ~ e
-~
r.~ m -
u~ ~ o
r; ~_n
i~ iii ?1
r
~J ~`1
~ '~
~ ~i
~' ~,I Il ~
~ ~ ~~
1= `~
~ ~ ,
c~~~
i, ,
~,,~,
~_ _r~
~i
-, ;~ ,
- ,_
~- _
~ ~ _~
~_~ ._
O n ~ r,
r~ m
n
,_~ Z, ~ -~
r ~ -.
~~ ~ ~-,
r, ~_ ~ z
~, ~; ,
~~
~ ,
.~ 1
-+ -i ~
u~, ~ ~
c r~
i~~
~~ ~-
z_
~~
rv
,~ r, m
r-
[: ~n m
~ ~~~
~~ Al z r
~~ •
.n a~
~, ;.
~~~
rn n.; m m r; ~
1- r- ,- r- r- ~,
~~~
rte, ,_~ ~~ ~, c~ ~~
~~

;, ~-, -
-~ t- i~
n , r•.; r~ ~, ~ -
.D ~ - ~ n
~.- ry s~
n~ .~ _b t11 i:~ ~ ~-i
.. - ~ r._, ~~ S
~ r_n PJ in i7~
~~a n r~~ r _
-~ w
~ i ~~
1 l i J
f I~: ~-
~~ i~
I IJ ~l (~ j
e ~ ~ e ~ _~
r ~~ n n ,
~~ til ~ ri1
> >~ i ~
[__ ~_~
m
r
~,,~s~,,~~,~,.m
s,~_~~.,~, <
o ~
~~_ rv ti ,r- P ~ i i
({ r, - ~- -
.i. ~: rr r,. ~.~, ~ r-
n r ~~ ~~ ~ - r~1
~ ~ i D
_, ~ z
~ r_,
-i c,~ ~ n -~ ~ n
a ~ ~, rl,
..~ ~ ~ ~ m
,- ~ ~ ,
_1 --{ -~
-- ~ !Sl -iA ..~
. s ~, z> ~,
~ -{ U
ci ~ •
n-i ~
.- 9 rr;
TiZ Ti •
F ~. ~
CZ71Tl :5)
7J D ~~~ fJ
O U~ L r- 7._
mm ~ n
„ ~ ~r;
r -i r, i
. v ~,
~~~ 1, x
~~,
._ ~„ .
~, ~ ~ .
n ~~ cn
~,
~'
,~

O
x
y
W

C
Vf
m
Z
n
O
Z
C
O
Z
~I
Vf
~_
O
z
Z
O
N
Z
Z
O
A
~- O
-i
Drn
• O
N
N m
+ 70
N
O rt'
X
~ ~
OZ
to G~
DD
N ~
A m
+
A Z
~ 1
2
~~~
O
3
~i
? ~
~• A~ i
.\~
i /
-~~~
Z ~ I
I /
~~L

~ N ~ -N-I -i N "~
_
D~ ~ D _
D~ D ~
+Z + +Z x ~

N }
~
Op m
~ ...~^^
=y'
A ~ T r
~
O:i
y p0 O
~ ~
~ m rn
~ Cm
Z~
-yiz ~~ ~~ czi~ ~ m0
Dp y D DZ
O O O
N N ~ N A Q Z
NO V N OO D Z
N
o~ N N
oo O
Oy, ~ O
z^'
Z
z O
z O
~ N N
T
O

70
~O
~ r
~~
r
V
00
b
a
V
+
O
0
0
0
D
,o
+
0
0
S

~'
~'
~~

2
f
3
n
c
G
n
m r
W C
Z
J u
V
D
R
z
m
~A r
V:
m
x
O
2
O
2
q!
--~ ~~ m
~ ...~ < C
`~ ..( ---
~. ~
~~ ~ W ~ ~ V
~ ~
~ c -i w m
N m
~ n
~ n
W n
N
i
< m m ~mD•v D'9 Dv -imD•O D~ Dv Da
D x D xm-~a -~a -aa xm-~a -i a ~ a -~ a
a v ~ z
~+ fn .
j 2~Dv D D ~DV D ~ D ~ D v
D H x r z• z• 2• r 2• z z Z
m OD
OD<
~
DD
DD ND
=0D<
DD
DD
DD
m G7 D n
m <D <~ <v m<D <'o <v <~
~ =oma my my oma
z m~ m~ m~c
O ~ m a• as as a• as ax as
m D a ~"~-+D DO DO ~+D DO DO DO
v <
y zzc>o cox cox ozc~o c~ x c~ x c~ x
~
x m
s
r mm
or v m• m• m mm
yr v m m m•
m mDa-1 atn aA 1Da-I aN aN a+
D
m a
-i ~< D 2
1 m 1 D
-~ D=
1 x~ D 2
m -
~ D
n~ ~= ~
v xamD mD mD •
amD 1
m mD m
x
y
y
9
y
N
v ~
D
r 0
0 ON O' O
0" OD O OD
zomD mD mxD zOmxD m~ mx
D mm ;,D
~
-i+r cnr Ar -i+r +x NI
- +i 2
~ + -~ v~ N -i + --i w D N -~ w D ~ m
D r A O m r 0 V r O J r
< m n n n m n -+ n -~
~
m VlrO ro ro mr0 ~n ro ~n m
~++ wmz
mn mz
n mz wmz n m z n c
Z
Z -I • a m
a wn
a vin
-1 a ro
m z mn
a ro m
'~ S m m m S m [A C'1 m y n rn
Dv-~ v-~ v-~ Dv-i a v1 a

~
m
zamm
A m
mam
m
mam
zamm
~~
m
im
m
m m ~~

n
m ;OD mD m
mD w
'yc m
a w
tpc a p
m
-~ ~+~m Om ~m ~-+~T fpC Dm V1C `^m
Z = v
0 0 O O O O O D C
~
D m
~
a O m
i
om O m D
~~ r
'
a v a
-~vm m m n
-•ivo 0 Om m
c xmm m m xmc n c n
~ oa- as ~r O a O
T a_=~ < m+m m n
v < ~" m~
H G> v v v c) D m m
aom m m ac--i c~- .~
~ mm
Div
f
Dvm m m -1
~1N N N --~-im o< m <
v
m mxcn
a. ~ cn mx

a• w m v

m

m ~

m
1
D
i m m m -1 f0 f W tD to
N O N m
v D r D
` D O - N
< D D
m-
a
w
~~Eo T~
I~IN ~ I~
i o o~
I
~ -° Z rn
I 1
~ - ---
0
C
00
~~
y;
>.
N
v
vv
~~
D D "i
~ C
~ O A = T
+ + r^
°o m O
~~
°~ Or
Zo ~m
z
vN ~~
A ~ ~ Z i
~+ DZ
-i o° O ~
Oo Z~
O H
Dm
~~
+_
~~
V ~p
~v
m
v
m
D
W

~ r ~

f / \J/ -- -- ~N ' D
_I
0
f
o ~ ~
O~
~"] ~
O
~y O
Z p -- =J ~
O c -- -^^~
Y+ r

O / C
QD C
~ C ~

v

I
_ ~
a
f~
m O

N
~;
a~
r A.
0 -- -- - --

~~
°
- ~ ~ E ~ o
O ~' ° N
C ~~

GD
'°

- i
f ~ I
°
8
~ rn =r
F.1
~ ~ ~~
rn Tz
z~
~
~
Zz

=F
TK
A~
~ i
0
~~
Z~
~~

I~) ~~~/: ~J01;
i. m`-~~1 w ~ ~Pr o,i',L 41 a-'_rdy-~yP.rlgn
~'

~~
0

-~
D m ~`"*+ D
o O~ r
I
I
o
C ~~ ~p
0 0~ rn ~~~ N--~~~
° ~ m (~ ~-,

a
Z ~ ~ ~
°
~
o Z j p~ ~~ j
~
+
0 ~ ~
oA Z I
I N Z ~
~m
i O
O N O
- ------

O
~
~

N

~ c -i m
N n
W
D

T
X
D
~-
N
~ .m
~ ;
>m
o H
-i ~
x N r
Z
O
~
D fJi
O Ip
~ ~ y
~2
m S m D ~C
m
z D
r ~^

v
rn
Z
m
v
T ~
Q ~
7~ ~
D
v
V
C N
r
n o
N
~ S
~o _
v a
O °
Z
C
c
70
m
\ ~~
\\ O
.~ ~ V

D Y D
~ ~ ~,;
~~
0o i.t
o, cr c
m m
1~
Y
~_
. W
~n~
-~

p

<'~
~

DODO T~
O ~ r
y
=~
N ~`
--
C
N
z o ~ ~ rn y ~ /

~
H

6i ~

~
v
r
Z ~

~

~

~ ~

- r~
~a pz Q rnO v O Q~° ~I
O ~~ m ~~
N Z <"' Z

N
OZ
+ W -

wA ~Q

D
c ~ ~ O
D V
m ~ -
~~ °°

{
V
b
v
D ~ ~ N E~
~ Zv
'i rn
O W
i~
ao
~ ~ ~
r

n N ~ ~
rn
~~
v ~
a m`
C ~
~ .-" ~
mz
o ~

o
z -e
H Z
°

3 x
~
z ~
CA A ~f

REVISIONS
4J%26/[0%E
R:~.kcnd~~~gyVP~ o f'~.1:~4:LA ~'..,-,Jy_poFlJ?.sign
I ~.rrt.>J DIN
'~
'~ ~
~~
I' ~-I~oD~
u n II n ncn ~-ir-oD~
n 11 II a °~ ~y~oD
n II

=
'._
2
~ 4' / 4'
s'
~
I

~
W~~v°
~ p0p0~aa (p (~i.~~0.~
R~
rm I
~
NGa ~J4
~~~0,0 ((_ttJ~~N
+
~ ~ '~~' u u
u
~p06'q~
V~GItnO
~ o
o
GS °
m -A
t
CnN
~
~ 4
~w~
~ Q~~W
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
m ~ ~ y
5
~ ~ ~ ~~roD~ om~-IroD
II 11 I
II
Z -a:c: II II it II II V) '
I
II II II
~ y ~ ~
~ q~~flvU ~ ~ ~~~V~~~
00 $ o ~ ~ ;.~,
<. ~~w ~ bZ~l
o
OI
/
mr~ ,
N '.
pm~yrpD

~
4' a 4'
~''liiii~i ~
+ ~y~OD=O
nnllnu~ -
nn nn
yu~
~
n
~ (~
t
~~
Z v
V warn
+~
L Q _. ".. ~ ~~~
W§ V~t
~ ~
~~~
>
Z oZ
~~ 4 / 4 ~
~~~j xo
u~i (n fo Z I
i '~ N
r ~
S II W o 00
I I

c O r ,
n
nn
llu~
(n ~° x < .p
`~ ~.IN~1
~~ ~ ~
~; Q a ~:
o ~o ~R $ ~
/ w ~~O y
m ; ,,
l~ b l ~~ '
~` ~+ , ~ z ~ om~-I~oDz
'S~ mS~~° ~ °o o > - _ II II II II II V
~i3>~ ! ~ ~i.._ vwi~~N~(4~11V~iyy}..
S ~ ~ VI Y~i
~ ~ 5 ~o y~~
o~ ,n ~, ~ ~~~o ~' nn unlln[~nvv
-' o
I ~5 ~~~~
x ~ I I . /I ,' I NC GR R
n i I ~m~yrOD
~~~~s ~~~ I I ~ i ~ o o << ` ° u u u u II u n
c~ oy~ ~ '?~" Z - o ~ (nNlO
tiN ~- `
NGm
TAB o (;; _ . _ . _ '~ d
r n
_ I > ~
~1 .._ i IL cm ~A I~ 'ti
;~ ~~ ~ ~,
I lYl ~.. I y
~ I I ~` ~= aZiO
j I` r ..'.
ii - ~~ I
T9 , ~~~ .. ~ C)
.c n~, \ r r'J
( ~ t~ ! I f)„ Sl
~ ~ ~. I o '
~ I ~ r ~ , ( _
~~' I~ ~
n ~ ~ R ~' n °a ~ i~c,
~ ~~
_ o .. _..
'--~ Oo iii
- ~ ~ I~ ~ W ~ 4~ ~ ' 'i I o

I
I V
~ Ul
~
N }
}nn~
Iiin -
y =. .:
~ 1~ ~

r' o
o
~
_, ~. K~z y

~
~ 20fOQ (n
i I I + n_ ~~ ~

'~ I
I I 20~ y o
~ Om;;
(Vl
Z !/
I ~
C I
PI NQ]
O

'y ;
ui
o
m
x
'~
b
I C
~
f
I '

,~
~.:

I
.-
n
.:

'. ~ _

~

~
o

I
_. -
_ ~ n
_m
, a
_..
- r
T
'
;~, r
~
~g

I ~~
- -

~
a ai ~ _ ._
.._

__. ~ l N
O '~
I I I i (
., ~
~ ~ ~ $~

~ l
C
~ j
`
, '~
~
~
q
O
~
~ (,
~
W p O
i „ ~r I ~
2 , y~ ~ na rn r ~ _

1~:~ w ~ ~ _ X p F ° _ ~ ~
~ $ g
~, ~ _ ~ ~ ° g I ~
~±
,
~,:
_ ~
°a
Fl
o
~
~
I
~r
~
~ r

I
~
~
~

r
~
n~i~n
m
~ ~~
r r.
~' c
S

~; `
X m
~O
~
I ~ 4r:fO
'm ~
~ Z ~
Z

~, X
z p
o ~N
~ o p.
N ~y
~ b
n f
m~
~x
V) n.`.I7
N "~ ~
o m
Z

~ ~ ~ cnn '' m 7 Z@
r
`~ ~o
bO ~ N ~ ~, ~~ I
:~
F
n cn

"Ji l^!'OGC
~R.~.6o ~ ~ ~n ~. P..~,~Ab41`~3_r-dq_ayp.dgn
n ~
mw
xo
n~
D -i
<o
~~
- -----

I "W

TER --

TA ----

BLE" _-- T
I

~ " - - - -

NO WATER TABLE -- -

" ---

n
I
I ~
m
4- -

7 - -

1 -

1- -

-- I

; .__ _

~.._
-~--
T- -~--
--
~--
I I
I ~ m

1 O
f0
O
V ^

~
~
I
-- ~
O I f0 O V A

~ H
=
~ , I I --~

I ~
I
Ii I
i I ^
I ~

' --~
-_
--
-~
_
- ---
~
'" -
I
- -'
I
1 I v
m3z ~
i
N
O OD
V ~
v,
W ~
g ~
W 1
~ I ~ ~
N
~
j ~m.+
z
S ~
Z I
I i -
O
m j V •,
D ~
Cn CT O O O N f7i i fT O O N Cif ^ T C H

' ~z~
~' r i
-- m

'
~
I z ~••~
~ ` z
~
Nom ; ~ i~ ~~ ' imoc m
im~o ia o V a v
l wjmlrnla iw ~~; m
ocni
I o 0
I o jcn
' o ocn~cn v, lo ~cm
`~ •~ I~
i ~ ~
~ z ' m

z
i
~

- --
---+
--
--
-
--
}-_ __
-
__ _
v

~~

1
I
~
_ -
O
~
I
I
~ ~ ~~I
1 I! ~ o ~ I -G
1
~ ~ w
o y m
~
' ~ m
i ,~ I
o 3 C/)
~ ~ ,
m w o i
I ~ Z C

i
I
I
I
I
I
, i
N ;
~ ~;

- ~- i
I
--
--
--

~-- IT f
I - I
--~
--
---~
- 1
--..
~
C m
< 1-•1 I

,,
rr
7 Z
I
I m Z +~
Ii II _ _ ~ ~ i 1 I _ '~ ~
~
~ ~ o ~

~ i 1
~ J p7 W ~
~ N ~ O
fD
i ~
~~~ UD
O s ;
I ~
C i
I 0 0 O~ fT ~ O
N ~
~
I ii wl m

-
--
-
--'
- I

~ __ 1
- --
-
-

_ v
i m
~ ~
~
1 I -+ ~

'

I

I

^
H I

I
I ~
o, V ~
cn w -.II a w~iv oo m ~I~ m i
!cn

i o 0 ol inif m' miolin,in io ~ I
V
I
,
I
--- _

- ;
-- I
---~ -- __ ~---
-_
~ ~ I
~ I
I I ~
v ~
' l ~~ .

j N ~

~ ~ ..
i
~~
•~ !~ 1

~ m

=mz D
,
I
• O
' O O f0
O OD
O V
O Of I
O 1 N
0 A I W N i N
O I f O fy
33 Z
~
I
T O O
I 0 zi I
U ~
--,
__ -- - -
+
- -
_
__i
-- - -- --
- i
I
f
~ _
~ m
I
I ti
i
H
Z ~ ~
I
1-1 O I

N N
OD W
N
O
1
V

A
-~ I
N
N
N
~ -+ j; ~
(O j 07 i A~ N
.s
O
TI O C
"~ C ~`
=
m '
D I
~ I
o' cn
I o o in i
o cn cn ~ cn o ~i o o T c m H I

I
~ I ~~ ~
~ I j D M Z =
i I ~ r Z ~ ~
I ~ r

_-t -
--
--
-
---
t- _
__ _i ,---.
.- r.,
--r- 1
_ I
I I
I ~ =
~ i
1
_ _ I
i I i i ~ N O O N N D I
I
I I N N
C ~
~ 7.7 I
.a
- i ~
--j -- -ji--r --1 - ; ~ m m
I

I
_
_
_
_ I
_ _ ~
,I
I
v m
(A
~

~ ~' i V N A I
I W W N
A O t0 -+ ;
j
' ~
0 C
O U1 f11 O fT fT (Jl N N X
z
~~ I
H ~

~
~ I
I w
~
~
m
~ O
~
-
' ~
~~
-{ I
-
! _._.
{ --. ;

~ __.
~ --~--a---~--

I ~ - - ~

: ~ ~~

m~
I I ! i i ~
r' 0
x
it O i
O V (T A W I A W j N i~ i 0 i f0 I A '~ m
ll
o cn o f o, cn o in in i u, w o' cn x~ I
~
~
--1 -~ -! - -- -~ -W --1 ---
M (/~
Z ~
m z
a N
.tD.
S
`~ ~ z~~
c~;°v
m z -~
oom
-n .~ 3
~~ o ~
~~~
~~ a a
' ~ ~
a t0
a M
C ~
~r
O
'~
DZ m
~ c~ 3
m p '0
v ~ ~
om ~
D m -<
r ~~ww
~ ~ Y/
~H
~_ ~
~~ H
~ Z
n~ ~
-i ~
H
... C7
w
x
0
z
z
c~
m
m
<
m 3
r' "0 n -°a
~ ~;
~
a ~~
_ ~
~ om
z .
--°~ ~ ~
;
`~~

D (/~
m =
O
~ ~ ~ %
o
~\~
C Z i
n ~ EMBEDMENT DEPTH HEIGHT
2 ( MINIMUM )
D ~

C W I
m a ~ ---
~ W 1
H 1
O Z
-i N m - --
= m °
W ~ S -~
~ y ~ ~~~
~ ^
C w ST
m ~
~
~ ~ $ ~~
o ~ im

D m
~
., v
i N 1
'-•' A
°
~~ D~ Dtn~ c
~ om vm v
m m
~z mz o~z D
~ f <1~ -I
D sD ~
» ~
i
D- i c
°
°ta m ~ z'a
r -i
m
i ~
D D DD ~
nm Sao nm m
m
D ~m m
t
i~ o n
rt' 70 °
.. o~. .. z
m mw =W v
i

o ~o
r r o
S z I
Z
~ r
i ~ i m
c (
p
i
z
o ~i °
= I
m
~ m ~m
c
z
~ mo o
-i ~

~ ~
N D ~

9~ m~
0

r, -i m m m
i W
~ ~~
' < <
m z

D
z °
n
f m
z
m ay
o D
Z
0
m H -I 77 m O -1 ~ (~ O O -i N --_.__-.- --_-_ O ti --I (n w T 2
Zm xm~x2 0o sO oc ~~~~~~ mcmm mo O
c> D O m ~+ m z ao v~ w s r m ~o l
-i
.•+o mcmr c» sz cps -itnlmc~s ~,~vm c~ en
zm -n~vrc> os co o~ ~-•~oxDaD c~~oc~ ~-i rn
mm ~-.s~mO zD c)1 z-i ~rDC)Ox z-Ix-i Dm
m.+ c~mmvz t~c~ x N mvmxc.•~ -~D rs
xc~
z sz -i
cnm-ixx -~-i
so c
~-+W -i -
svi m..mTZZ
xm~•+.+ c o..~o-i
zz~x •a
•vo
~••~ vz oD C77 wm C-i xc>r~~ rG) m 7oS
~m m~oro O c'>D r rD < V) OD
~~ c~Wmm1 1~ v-i 1z D•ovi -Ix nxD <70
I mm ..- ~c~o r+c ax .+o L7~••~cmmm oov ~••~<
I Cam D -i 9 Ow mm OD Or7ors~-+ z7ov W
~••~v
D3 rtnxf
mV)~••i2 z-i m
mtp zs
v «+mc>o c,
z x•0 -i2 m~.as
ZaZO ..m
OS
mz sm
2
D o
m z I Ov~mDy~ Dc~v zo
m
t
n -
n iD to o ~1
~ m~
r-~ o~x z z x mDC~~•+r
O m I
~ D ~ s mmm•n
n rO
O
v
• ~-+z~
x xT D x D,
., x
D~ ~
m cnv tnm o< -~x o.~+ rzmN.+~n o m
~ ~-+o
x x xv xz rc~o••cnx ~tm~ m
y
x Z
zD z
o z= ~ ~
~r i~ x
S
~~ i
c
ic w OO
D' zD

Vi xzo -i xs r mw-~ O zmv D
SmOZ m m T
~
O O
n
z o Z i
c r
'
m
D'n O
D z
0 01 0 2 CA G7 -~ mN DOx rOZO •~
1 xDrm x r+ ;mA-I<n rm() m
~•+Wm o 00 O ~••~-fo-~mD WmCA z
~ z
c
z T 70 ? N ~ Z
c
imc
ic
i~ a
+ai vsmD G)O0
2 -I H W Z h 3C !n O~ z z ~1 9 n
~-+ m x z ~o c~ c~ m c m ~ .+ c~ • .+ m
m o c~ o z o z -+ o -i z
< xmm c mW 9 oz n xc~ o
m oow z ~ ~ -I ~ aCD m
~ ~SD~ ~ m~i -i H Of~ -~imTm 1
~rvrv D vm o A m m ~•+lA
-1 Z7J N ~ ~z JC ~ SWnN
2 -1~~m m m m z ~~ .-ice G1 m
m mroz x z< z m x DDrrz ~t
z z r 1 m c~ cn m m z z ~••~
~
~ < w
m o
~D ~
z zzc
i~ D rv z m r
j o c~c~aer m o m o x-1 mvr•~s
m
m T v m
I N O(
A m mo 9 D S
c
O
m m w D S
m m
< •
(A
TI ~ -
1 v -
•1
O
~m
~ x-•i H w N Z N
m o
m fr s N a x z z
z r m G)
---'- --- --- -- - -.N

I'; .. V~n~]Jw~y\~~-Jj\f. GI'~i ray ~u ni.!11n
~l
fi
P~
hh~p~
r~

hW
//~~~
V,
My
1,
v
WWWI~i
YdK
~~
1R'~
/ar1at~yy
pby
1
CW
~,
~~'ig
-•s~
~~~nu
Z~~x
otl i
2
1.,~y
.,
sr
~~
v~
qz
A
n ~.,/
Z "`~
~nni ~y
~i r
°z
z

u~2C~0E 4:~13:SG FM

Q

~ u
+
Po O ~
+
u°~ ~ .
+
°n ~
+
u°. ~
+o ~
+ V
~ ~ P

„ ~
U P
+
o +
V
u. i i
v
n t
+
g
V fb S

~

F7
ti
~
!-
I J- ~ ~ 1 - J - 1 - ~ l - ~ J - ~
~ Z
' ~ ~ ~ = ~ = ~ ~ LOCATION (LT,RT, OR CL)
° ' FROM
- - -- STRUCTURE NO.
70
P
P °
~ ° '
b TOP EIEVATiON
N ;o ' " d
G a
C O
P ° m
P INVERT ELEVATION
.. p
m
N U
p0
INVERT ELEVATION
SLOPE CRRICAI
- - _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Z
-_-- _ _
_ - - - O
_ _ - _ -
- - __ - - - -_ _ _ -
-_-.- Oz

--
-
- R o^
- - - - - - ----- s
p ~ r~
--- E

_
.
_
-
_ .061 :~ `
•

-
u

___

-_
^

+
_

m
_
_

.064
u. _ ^
\ '

._
_-
_
_
__
_ _.
_. _
_..
.-.
-
___ .064 m °-°
c • _

_

-

-

_

_

-

_

_

-
__

-

-
_ __

-

-____
064
----

___
ti

Z
~ l_/I1

y
- _ - - - - -
--
-------- ~

,_
.079 -
C
~
_ _ _ ~_
-
_
_
-
-

--

~-~-

o

,
- - - - --
.079
= H ~
_ _ - _ ___-.___ P A V
m

_
_
_
__ _
_
-
-
-_
_
~_
__109_ yy
m m
- __ -
- - __ - - - - -109-- - ,
~
--

- -

- - - - - -
_ _
~
~
- - - - - - - ------ - ~ A b

_
_
__
_
-

- -

~

- __

-

-
-
_-
_
__
__
-
___
__
_
_-

-
__

_-
___
____.-
_-__- _ m
i __

~ ~ A N

~ A p P _
Zsn
--- -
~~

-
-
-
- P 3
z ~
""~
- - --- ~
",

_
_
_
_

-

-- -

-

-

-

- -

- -- ti

- D O ~ Yy

m ~+
'
~ `I
~
i=9
15' SIDE DRAIN MPE ~
~ ~1
^

18' SIDE DMIN PIPE .
MCI f
\\\ ~~'

" `
h ~
24
SIDE DRAIN PIPE r~
/~
0.C.P. ~ v~ c ~
-- ~ ~ZC V
~
- -- -- - - - -- - -
C.S.P. ~ A~~mA~,~
~ O u S °' c f
~ M
J ~ ~
`
_

u
J

.
~
.__

_
~
_

.
~
PER EACH (O' iHRU S.0')
QUANTITIES
FOR DRAINAGE a
`
`
PEE
_
]

_
_
_____
'
'

>
-
STRUCTURES `
A
l

_
_- 5.0
THRU 10.0 C • TOTAL l.F. FOR PAY /
~
QUANTRY SHALL BE COI
10.0' AND ABOVE m .
'A' + (1.3 X COL.'S')
/~
C.B. STD. 840.01 OR 57D. 840.02 ~ ~ w~a
.T h"d
L
a
p~
__ _. __. -_ __ ._._. _.._ __ ~ ~
_ __
~
~ OS
~o
- - - ~ - __ ~
~ b
. ~

D.1. STD. 810.14 OR STD. 840.15 P`
y
V
D.1. FRAME a GRATE STD, 840.16
_.._ -.. _ ___ ._ _. _ -. _u. J _.. - _ _
-__-
D
I
G
ME "A" STD
840
17 OR 8
.
.
.
.
.
40.26
G.D.I. TYPE "B" $TD. 840.18 OR 840.27

G.D.I. TYPE "D° STD. 840.19 OR B40.2B /~~

__
I

_-

_

_
.

.. _.

_
~
_ _

-_

_ __.

_

_

-

__
G.D.I. FRAME WITH GRATE STO. 84032
V

~. J Y

__t

_.

___

`.

_-_ ~

__

_ - i

_. I.

..

__

.__.

_._

___

_-~

_
-- ___ __--_
G D I. FRAME WRH TWO GRATES STD. 840.22
__~ ._._ _.___ ___ ____.___

I
G
D
N
S
FRAME WITH GR
TE SiD
8

"'
~
~ . (
.
.
.
.)
A
.
1034
G D I IN.S.) FRAME WITH TNO GRATES STD. 84019
1.8. STD. 840.31 OR 840.32 ~
" - ~ TRAFFIC BEARING DROP INLET STD. 840.35 •``
M.D.I. ANGLED VANE FRAME WITH GRA1E STD. 840.33
-- - - ~ - - - --- -- -- -- ~ a•'o
~:_=~e
_ - - BERM DRAINAGE OUTLET STD-850.10 ~ ¢~w~J
E
PE
- - `~ u
~
__ - - - - - - _.- - - -_ _ n
a
.-_- _- _ --._ _ ~

N ~
N ~ CORR. STEEI EIBOWS NO. 6 SIZE
CONC. COLLARS CL. "B" C.Y. STD 840.7T
CONC. 6 BRICK PIPE PLUG, C.Y. STD. 840.71
g o L
+ PIPE REMOVAL LIN.FT.

00
~
~
~
oo mm~m rl~ozn
?~ bo=bm ~
~ I
mo
. ~
~" ~ ~
- ~
- ~p _ N ~ r

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ S ~
~ o
_ ~ Z
$~
u Z
~Z ~
"
O ~
~ ~
n n 0 0 O
Z£
~ Z
~
~ z
0
~, O
O
HQ 0
~ ~
~ 09 _ O Z H 'C

~ ~ z
c
~

z 7+

I

S
K

10/: 1'?~JUe 11:43:4 cl~i
k:~H.~oUe~Y~F: ~J~Dall~3_rtlY-si~m.tl9n
~~Z
nab
~~$
4C
f~~
~~~
y~o
Z u
m
n$z
n
~2T
<~;
cx
rt ^'~
~~
_~
0
~.aocz
_ ~
~n ~: y m
~ ~ N
-1 !O ~j D
a .°„ ~ ~
mc~3
~~~d
~~oa
~ c
m
~ T ~
~ ~ ~
C p1
3j017
-p d a ~<
C ~ ~
3oc~
~. d
~O °, ~
X j
~~ 2
rG d
.'~ ~
f~
N
.~.
2
"~ O y ' ~

5

~
°~p
L
°
jst~
Q

~ "
p
~ °
()
~

~

~
o m
~
O
° u
+
O
°
-

~
o ~
~.
°
~ m
a
U
° u
1+n
p
°

m m
#
~
0 u
#n
y
0
'~$ °
~ R
o
~ ~
a ~ ~ ff
+
V 8 ~ 8 N
U ;,
S 0
Z +' + Q
f
f ~
U
~
° s
s
~ 0

S
O
O C
(.~
~ 1pJp~
Oi
V
P
~,

c ~ ~
<
Z-
0
Z
s

N
~ ~ ~ 8 P e ~ o

b. m & '? ~
u` w
N u
S w Se
o
f
O N
O
r P
z
O
-.~
m
o ? y
a `~
a~
<Fa
~ c
~ ~~
C y
~ ~~'
7 G1
7 p~
~7 N
~? d A
~ c
'° ~
m
m _~ ~
~~ ~
av m
~~o
~~n
o~ ~
C ~
~~
aC
m ~
m
o b b
~
~
'r
r
r-
'
~ y ~ ~ .
r
r ~ ~
A O O v
+ In
+ tr
+
~O ~ }
° °D O O ~''' O O
0 ~ _ _ ~
O _ _
-~
O O
+ O
+
,~ V
+ I!~
+
0

+
~
A
+ _
~
~ (
~~
D
O O U O O
V O
O Z

~ .r
W
W
N ~o y
in
~ OD W N OD W V O S
a O P N A A D r
F 1
C
O ~ A ~Uo
N C U p 7C
~' C
n
O ?

<~
m
W~

z
n
~o
~~
ti x
°ZO"C~> °~~yC~
G1~~6Z S
~i ~-p n ~m ~~g~ n Ss"~
8 8 U P 4' Gtc~~~°° m ~ ~ ' ~ GZi 3 00
O N
y~ g > °O
> yO O SS~ ~' ~cj° m y T ~ N [L[~'~
~ + O pO ° (~j /~~j--11~~TG C N # + + Q ~eTn ~pO
C s ~ s s t ~ o z Mi ; ~^7~i in ~ ~ ~ r~~i ~ ~ ~ ; 7'f
x ~,
A 8 0$0° ~ ~ o ooa$
o m ~ c~
nP ° C V G ti ~~
+ ~ ~ ~~ ~
m~~
_g ~ ~
° o ~
~r ° ~ o N g ~ ~t~i
N i o I~ ~ Z~~~ <~ ® Z r
~y < > °~O ~ n x °~p
1G ~ a I ' r L °
(~ O 8 8 $ g $ 0 8 0 ^}~ ~ o A $$ $ g o e o b" ^}~ £ o °~
c - ~~~ ~~~
n ~ c `a ~ ~~ Z ~~
~~ ~~
~ o~ ~ ; o-
+ # 4 } ~ ~ m P
O 8 8 0~ a+ z
° 8 8 $ = P ?e °~
m ~r~i
O
u.
g O 2 ~ ~ ~ I m
q b +~
~~'a? O 06 v°~-i
r2
2 O ~ £ N ti
O o- a o S O
°~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~
_ _ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ^
o~ ~ y, Z~ ~ ~ ~7
° ~ ~ ~ "~
~ ~ zr
o~ _~ N
°~ ~ ~
f - - E ~ ~ ~
°~ ~ ~~ C ~'
~ ~~
- o~ N a~ ~
- - - - - - - - ~ r-i
C ~~ ~ ~ ~ z
C ~) ~
- y ~1
g -
M Z°i
O __ _
~ ~ - - - - -
rt
cb
y~ ~ FF g
~~~ - ~ >~
~~ 1T
~>z 1
~ea~°
y c
~m
~~R ~ ~-~
~~~~~
O
p ~
~ b ~
N ~ 8 ~ .~
,~ x r, O
~' ~~
~~
~z
A 1~~y
ry
a ,~
ar
z~ ~
I

M ~
REVISIONS
n~_~.
r ~;
;r.
~
~,
o ~,
-:E,~
*
^j ;.,;

i,'..
'.a i

~~irOp~ ~~IrOpl~
uulluuc~ uulluuv~
$0~~, 1O I UI~~~~i,~~
$$~.~d~ i ~,R~"4~i
~~~ ~~_~
~-Irop~
n n n II n~
~o
8~~1~~+
W
~ ~yw
y
~`IrOp~
II II II II ~IIp
~1 O
..: ~$ +
~~~~ O
of Cy
`Y Q~
~ o z ~gr~n ( I _Y
Uri IT f~ ZON r
O O (]
O ~
~~~
`~ ~ m + gcs
Ao ~
~o
m r~i ~ O
~' n vm
/ /~J.N I ~ n$ O
m~
in o
i /
~
/Il
~
~~
~~ j
i
I
~ ~~ ~
~
N~ ~~~!~
, ~
~ /
v~h
~~

~

~_... ._., •.
i

`
i ~
c ..:~
L {: l
m..

, I
s
~ I::.
~~ ~~
.
~A
J I
~~
~
T ;~
Y
~ ,! ,
i
1 ~t r
~ Il
'2,
^),
I
< <~ ~
s

1 ~ ,. 1

~
O
~ I
A
i
I +

~ ~,
I ~
t
'~~
I

~
~~
` I
;~
v , ~ '
cu
~. n ;^
~ 'j

z ~ m
n '

... v

~
F
~; r
(os
rgg
8O
;. /

Q -

i
~~
1
~~
~
~ .. I
/
v`
Ur

~.. ii r. }or I ~ , /
c 5 t~ ~...:
~ ~-; ~O ~ ~ , ~! a
N'
N ~ +
N
L
(
a (~
~
~ . X
,
o °o
r '~ ~y 6 / mo

I,
,
~
~~
O C
r, N
N ~ •°o
_ w ~ ~ r'
o o~ ~~~~ ,
~Q€ ,x ^
' nO ~~To
= T~ ~
.~1~

_

.
X m XT S
~ ~ r
~

~ ~ N
_ Ao A O
~~
£

` \ L ~'
`~ t ~

'>p~ z
~~
~"
O n
aS~C'r ,
ism '
p

~~
ZL
~z
O~
O
=

~O
~ ~Z
~~
rrtpr
p1-i
I ~

!n N
~O 1 ~ ym~ ii`

a O.
000
.._
uui0 ^,~~
r
... ~°n)
s[ -~Zm
<Q ~.
./ rH~
s .

,O ~ _ ,
8 =
~e

- + Jr~ ~ +
to o
- o.
~-

' ~i o o:;..
~ o o 00
o

~
c m
p, ~
-~ ~
I + o =gm
~• O
N O
O O
C
~-Irop~
nulluu~
~~~~Aat°
Q~~Nwo~
R~~
Ocn~~IrODZ
cn~'p a 11 a u~
~~~~~~~~
~ ~~
I ~ b~ ~~~N
Q
c°nnV'i~'~roD~
uuunlluuc~
O
`b'w~~~`~'~~
O (.~
~~w
~~IrOpb
II II II II II
`w~R4N
8~~~'~+
1
~~~
i I 3 J-
I D a~5 >' ~
° H °~ r
oN ;t °
o. ~: ~
00 „t oN ; o
O .. - yy 7 m
O
~ ... .. +~ Oppp
O ~
m n s
N-1~
_
~, N -~'
~0
V i ~
ZZ p9p ~ t'A

i.' ~ ~:

l .
J
~lL
G
D :li
,
i
I ro
~ ''

n I .-`~
~~
~ I n ,_
`z.
' ~
~ ~; ` °~ '~' T

6 00

~~9

C s

~~
r
yu~
o
- -
~'~
_

0 _ ~ (~~
r

~ t li
s~.>,
L
N ~
y ~
~D~-
m~~z
sy ,:n
~~mu

20~yj n
~°oF "gym "~
aZ
~~
~
O ~ZK
v
`rCZL
C
r ,y
4
r
~u-~co I

I r «
' ~ 1

I
I .~
~-~ C 'O
o yn
00
O
~~ O {~ a
;V tlt
A i .'
I O
J" {
Y
~ W O ..1 Q
~ A O ~ t
O ~ n~ i V
';
x ~ '~
ni
~b ~
Z ~
~
g~ _
o
rn
rg
NN
` os
m~
h ~~O
s ~
I 6 ~
m
ly.
t ] p~
p
412
G
D ~

~
~ -

yy
-i ~
N N

N O
V V
r Vp
N p
~ N
p
N
~
O

~I~, z~

~ If =T
i"
i
~ U
N
N vo
v~

NIN
N U °o (°o V

ols
;~
II
~~
~~
~m
mm
(n
mm
~~
~~
'I `G lT; ~ ppp~
O x ~
~
r ,
,°

+ ~ ~I _
~-
4

ot" - m
~
y,~ SAC
0 ~ _
~ ° o<D
T ~ ~~ o-
~
+ ~ ~
SC
O
H A
~ \
o
"" r
~ s
$~ ~m
4 v ~
o °
a i"i ~
~ go
a v;; w l r+
v o~ x
8 tnQO
y _ .
~ ~ N~
• BID
m = ~.
o
N ~
+ p o ~
g ~ _ \ ~ -1
~o ° D_
t a
w ~ ~
m +
e 0 ;; x
y D X ]
O ~
~_
~~~
z
S
~r
H~
~z
y~
C
~~
z
z
_<
~~
Z
O

ii
a _
o.~~
'~~~
I
u"_
of
,I:
'~il
w,
b _.
!j
i
~,
'Q
1
i
0: i
~:
N
O.
I
~'
O
A.
A
I;
',
40.
O'.
'O` _.
'., ',, '. :I.
i
V
O
~'. '.
O
d; ii
OI. ''
O
O
V
D

~,
O p q
~~~
N ~" va
i
o

~ _ I.
i
i

~
I ~ 1

o
~ ~
~
I

~ L ~
_
I
_. I ~ _ ~
!

~

~:
l

~
i
w

o ~!
i`

~ ~

~

i

~'

na
o ~ i

~ ~
~_ ~
'.

I
i

i

C

I

o

~ i
i
i i
~

'

I

~
o
c

I
I ~ __
I

~~
o ~
',

I J

'

L

''

~

i

i

i'
o
I

,Q

,` ~

1 ' ,

'.P
O

I

~ I

..
'
I

~

d

I

l
ii I

I

I

....

t

I
'.

~

,
I
i
O
/

~

~
I I
'~.~
~
/. . ~

W

'

~ '.

~ ~
i ~

'., ~ -
O

,..
1
~.

~

'.
N
O ~ ~ ~ ~,

I ~ ~
'
~
-
~

o
.~~
~
•~ ' ~

~

I i

~

~
i

I ~
'o +
O ~ CIl : ' ~ r° ~ J~
. ~
O n
`i
J

I ^
~1
I
i

I

1
.~ ,. ~
t~~..

. ~

i

!il"-
~..

.

f ''
N
O I

W
I
~ '
~
i
i
~
~~
~
I

i
..

'.
I

i

I
N
.O ., i
.:

I I ' I ~

~

.

i
l

'
~ ~ '.
'.
V
'.O ~.

~i
i ~ i
i

W
'O
'.

1

~
~

.

i

~

~

~
~.
`Q
~
~ ~ ~

'O

d .

'

~
~

'

I

~
t
I

~

I

~ ':

I

~

~

i
o ~ ~

o
~ !
i

'~ 1

I
C ~ ~

W
a

_

i I ~

~
i
'

' ~ ~ -~
~ ~
~A

;O

~ I.

I

-

I

I
Ii
I ~ - `
~ i

In

o
~

~

,

~~

',

' i
,
i
I'
U' ~

i
.aA

D D In

Ui

p ' Ln

~

~ N
O In n

F
t„

F
'~

n ~

'll

~
J

i ~ '
~~
I
~ n
w I
0
0
IQ
o
0
o

b
U
U
1
b
b
d
a I
I
V
~ I
I
Q~ . i.I
i ': ~
N
O '
W
O
A
O
O
O
V
O
b
O
o; r
o'
0
w a
a,
d
C
A
d
~' x
o ~

s ~
O
O u~ N
O Q ~ ~ ~ ( ~
q p Q~ I I ~
~
i
;~„I
~
~ ~~
rn
4 ~
'~
b

o
' ~

~ I' ~, 4
i
,
I o
'.co
4

I
I~

I

~
I
! ~~
~
I
w0 .
'

N
0

I

~ L 1
~ '.I

~
i ' '
~ ~

1
~' I

~
~
'.

~;
{
o

~~
~

(
~

~

~

0
'.p
O

.
~.
.. ~

i
-
I ~

~

~ :~I~

.
i
U

d

'.

`O
O r
I

~

~ ~

.

~ ~

'

~ I

~

~

'

I

o
~°

0
o
I

~
~~ ~
i

~ ~

~
i ~
~ i

~

~

i

(

,

i
~ ~
,

a
I

I
,'
I ~;
~ i I
}
~ ~

I ~ . ~ I
~

~I ~

~
~
o
I I
~
I ~ ' I ~ ! ~ ~ I a

O
-.

I

I

i
i t

I

'
i cn '
i O

~
O

, I

~

~ '

I '

i
~ ~

~ ~

(

~

~

~

~
I

~

~ .

pp
U

W
O
~ _.. '

.... ~

I
j ~
1 ~

f
~
~

I

~

~~~ ~'

~' ~~

~

'
'.,

I -' ~
I ~ ~

,

I ~
i
~~ ,
a

J f
. i . eaP ~

~ fL,
~
'.

~
~
Q
m ~
~
' `,
~ ~ ~ ~
~I f

0 ~
O
_ ``^^
LI ~
~
0

~I
~~

I
~

G
~ I
g i
~
I
~ '';
~
O
coy
~
I
~
~ cro

I

I

t I

I i
I'
~
~~ ~

~
~
~.
~ ~
~ , ~
'~
II
i
n
.~
o C) !
~
~ I '
r
p
'Z ~~ ~ I ~~~ i'
I ,
~~~ ~
~ "o

ra

I

L
m
~o
~ ~~~ ~ ~~ I ' I ~`~ ~ '
v'
~ ~
~
~
' I
~ i
r i
b
"j
~
~
~

~ I ( '
~

i i
t ~
~J

I
~
W
o
i
i 1 1
~
j
j I
~ i

~ .
o
I

o I

I
I, ~
.
(

I
I

I

~ I
w
I O

O

O

~

~
'

. ~
~

I
'.

.

~
~

- ~

1
~
r

I

~

~

i

..

.
' I

d
~ ~~
~
~
I. ~ ~ ~ I

~ '

I : .
"
'
~
O'
a
~ ( ' ~ , i
w
~ ~ ~

i ~
fill I

f

p
..
I

- ... ~ ~

~

~

I

I f i

I
~'. ~~ ~

-

X
~ t ~ ( _~ ~.. ~ ~ (..

C~ U
~ ~ I
~ ~ ~
G ~
~ ~Il
Q
n
(71
0

l

I
a
W

0

l

I
o ~
o ~
..
o ~
I
_

o
o _ t
P

~' '.
g I
\ ~~~ .
o !\
~
o I '~ \
~
o . _ ~ ,~

0 ~~ ~ ~
~
.~F
0
~ I ~ ~ ~
o ~ o ~ ~ o ~I
o
I ~
o
t,. ~
~ ;1

rn '

N

;~ a'

rn '

~ ~ /J
r ~ ~
~ -~;~
7
W ~ ~
, I
I 7
I ~~~ ~
~' _
~~ ~
m ~
~
~
~~ I ~
I
r
o ~
o I rn ~ ',
~
. ~ ~

0
'
I ~' ,
a ~
~~, I
`
o
o
o~
o
0
o
o ~
,,

I 1
o
I
N ~
0 I :..
a
~~ ~ .,
p.
~.
i ~ is ~~C'' ~n U~
T ~

i
~ I
Ul ~

O .
U tJt t

~ Q
~ ~ I '
In

O
' 1 `~1
In ~,

~
III---••+„ I
In
~
~
' I !
~ `.

~ I ~ I
f I

~ I

'. ;.
~ ~
~n
O ..
_
-i ~ _
-
~
~ '
I fl
_
A
O -

1

1 I ~ _ i ~ ~f
II

I

i
I

I.
~

'

W
O

~

~
-
~

~
I

;.
'
~
~
I .

I
I

I ~ I

, ~

W
.
, ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ i ~~

~ ~
1
o
N
o -
I l
I I f
I I
i 1
i
' ti
i
,,,
I

t

I I O

,.
i

~

i

~ ',

I
I

i

~

I ~~

O I
I ~~
I
`
~ ,
', I' ~

1
I ~

i

I
,

O

". I I
~ i
~ I O

O ~
.. ~
I
I
..

~

.. ,. I
~'
'
I
~ If
s. U

i
I

O ~
I
I ' ,
i

I

. ..

~
I ~ ~ ~~ i 1 ~ ,

o I
I' ~ ~
I

i
~
I

I

~

I

~ o,
1 ~
i ,
I
i

~

a
I

I

' ~
I

~

,
~

' ~
~ I
~

I
i ~ I ~
ti/ ~ ' ~
o j
i
I
~

/
~

I j

I I
,
I

J t ~
O
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' ~
' W.
~

+
~

N 1
,~ ; ~, ~

I ;
_I
I '

I
~ i .

~
n

~ 1 ~ ~

a
~ I
~
~

N

~ R

I
I

I

~
~

('
I

I i
~
~

,

d

_
~ eJ~, .

. ', cl" I i i ~

i J
O
i

~ ~ O II I' I
i

i
t

~

~

rw Fe~ ~ N ~ I , t { ~
fa
O.
..
I

i
i

N

W
O

I

I I I

~
~
i I
I
I I'
I I~.
I
I

I W
O

o ~ ~

I ' l
~ .

i

I

tn
o ~ ~

I
,
I' I ~ -

~~
~ '
~

~
II

P.
o I

,.

I
~
~

~~
~
I

I
~, '~

~
~
.

U
. ~
I ~.
J
~
1
,~
i
~ O.
t , i

I O

A

~

~

I
.. f

-
i

' I I i
~ I

~I i.~.

I ',
I I
t I I
~ I O

l
'
7 ~ ~
~ ~ I
I ~ I !

~
.
I 1
~.
I
~ ~ ~ I I
~ , i
i I I I C

..

~: ..
_..

i

.

~

..
~<

I

.

i

..

i

I

I

~

.

l

~
I
~

~~

I ~
~
,
~ ~
C
).._
~
~
~ i ~
~
.
I:

~.
~ I
.~
I
I T
.. ~ .. ~ ~ it I i ~.. ~
I W
I
~
n
I
I I
I

I i i O ?
,~

I ~

I

I

1

I
I

I
i ~~

i
I
~
' ~~

I
~ I Z

~.

h.

I
..

,.

~.

~ I
~
~~~ ~ ~
_

~

~
rJ ~
~ ~ ~
© 4
i ~
O ~n ~
~ ~
I ..n
J
~ ,
I
~ I
~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ "_
C
I i
~ ~ I ,.~~. ~ i
~ ~
1. ~ i ~ j
~~
I
-'- -- _. _~_ ~.~_~._----- - -
--

~~
;
~
~ I
~ II I n

N

.
'

~ ~
I

j, ~

i I

~

~'
I
I
I. i

i i IO
I

.

i i ..
I
~
`O
'~ (..i.l
~
o N
o .o
~~ ~ ~
I v I ~ ~~
~,m ~
o
N~ ° ~ ~
' t '~ ~ o
~ ~ ~
~
° ,~
' ,
~
~
t«- ~ ErF~ j ~
~
~ E~~-
~ o

N T
o f
,

-
,.. ~

I r~
I ~ I ill ~,
w
o ' ~, ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~

w
o'

o

~ ~ ~

~.
I ~ ~
i ~ ~.

«(
;
J ~ ~ ~ I

~
~ ~

~~ o
o I ~ _ I
~
' I
'~
I ~ : 1

I I

i
I
I P
I ~
f
~ III
I .
'.
... '. ~ ~ ~, V
tl 1.
,~ ..

O I - '.
' ~

I

P.
'.
i

I ~.

I ! D.
.
D i

.. ', '.

~

I

' :.

I
i

I

~.

p.
p.
i

'
O

..

i

I
i
i

f

'

i

..

'

I
i

~
I
I

I
~
' ~.
~ , ~ ~
~ '.I ~
4 ~ I
~~

l
~

~
~
I i
~°
~,

a
_1
I

I

~
~
I
~

~
~
~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~
o

.

W
0
l

I ~

~

~ ~~

I
I
~
I ~
~~ ~ ~
~ ~

I
'~ ~ ~ W
n
1

:

I

~

I
I
f I

I
I, ~
i

i

I
i

.

1
.
. ~

to

O

~i N ~A
~ ~ ~ O ~

I

U I

~,
1

I,

' i

lv hi ! i
I

I

I

N

I

I

N

U

N

U
P P

to
v

U to tn' ~
C o U
q ~T
i
N ~ ~ ' U ~
f I
q p O p i I

~
~
o ~ ~ ~ _
~' 1 i i' ~'
I~
I I ~ ~
c~

a
0 Y
~ I
~
~
i

i
i
~
i
~

'

I

~

A

0

~

W
P

I ~ ~
~' , ~

~.
I
I o

o :
: f 1
.. I ~~
~ I'
~' ~ ~ I I ~
O

~ I

o

~ ~ i

1

~

i
I I
~ ~
i

i
i. ~ ~

v

, ~ i

i
i , i
I
~
~ I o

ao
o I
~ ~ ~ ~ I
I~ h ~ I
~ I I I
~l , ~ I ~
~ I '- ~ ~ w
~ o

o

I ~ ~~ i '

I
~'

~
I ~~

.
I'

o _
~
1 ~ ; ~,
~ I ~

I
I i

~ a

I ~ ' ~~
I
' ~'

I I'
~,
~

I ' ~ ~ ~, ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~'
I ~ ~

~

`"

n
I

I ~
~ ~ i
i
I ~
~.
~~ ~
~ W
a

~

N
i ,
I

:
I
:
I
I
I N

_
O I

: I
~ I
EW~
i
_
U.
'.
:
i
:
~J ~.

i
I
~'

:
: ~

O

u

'. ' ~ _.. 8

Q

: :
~'
~
:
Ul ~ ~
0 ~

O
I
: ~ I ~
_ :
I ~ I ~
N

O
_.

~

t4
'
i ' f :.

N'

O

w
o
~

i

i
I
~
I I I

~

i

'
~
~ Wo

o I
i
it ~ ~
~
~~ ~

i
i
~

a.

I ~

~
1_ ,I
I
~
~ _I
I .; ~ .

o

~,

~ ,~
I ~.
~ ~ ~ ~,
I~
~~ ~
~

~

o

l ~~

I ~~ ~ ~~
~~~
'~
I
~.

~I
~~
W
l

I

'
o
~
I I
~
~

o , ~ ~

~I
~
~
I ~
I l ~ r

o

_ I
I

,.

I t ~ ~ ~~

~~~

o ~~
~
,I
~~ ~~
'~

~~

J

~

~
~
~
~,
i ~

,
O
: '~ ~
:

I
:

~ i

I
O : I

i II
it I
~ I
I
~ ` '. ~
~ ~ i I
I
1
~

~ I I~
`
~ .

o l
:

l ~. '
i

I
'
~
In

O In

4 In
sA
D d
Ui
~ ~n

~ LLn,

O lrA

p lCrn',

IQ ~
I. , I
i I'
~ ~
~
i. ~i, ~ I: I
~~

0
~~

0
0

~ 0
,_
~J ..
b
t
I L.1 ~ I
i
~
~
i

~ 1
1
~ ...
1 ~
441! Q
I
1
x
~

y ~ tD

'' ~ ~~
I~
o ~ N
r~ w ~ o ~
o ~' o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o P
X~
a

r
i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ b O ~ r „
~
q
~ I ~ i 4
O I ~ ,~ ~ I
~ ~ o

I
~ ! ,
I ~
I

A.

i
'

~

~ i

l~
I ~ f
~ ~ l ~ ~ A'
',
I
I ~
O

'O
.

,

'
i I
''
I I

If i

', i

(J
'

~

~
~
i /JI
, / '
O
,

i
I . ,
'..
10,
~ I P~

i

I

i ~

i 0.
O ~
',.

..
I '.

'I'

~p

~O i
I

~

~.
I ~
I
~ I O

I _~
i I

`
i .p j

I i
.. i
I
. l

I
..
I
I

A

'

i

~ j
i
~ ~

~ .
If
'~ ~.
:O I
i
I '.

I

j

~.

1 I
,.
_
i

~

'

i
.

.

' ' ~ ' t I ~ ~

/
~ : ..
~ i
~ i
d

~~ ~ I U

L
t :
O
'

Cn '.

I
d ~. ~ I ~
1 j
U1'

O I
I ' ',
~ ' I
!!/
I I
I

i
I
- ~
..
'. ~
~ ...
,
i

,

..
i
I
~.

~

~.
p
I. I li ~ ~ ~.. ~: ~ I ~
I I ~
~
i ~

I ~
.
a ~ I 1 ~ I ~
~~

~ E~~ .
I
~ E~

i

4

I

~ ~

~

~

'~
I

~
~ II
`~ ~ ~ I !'
~ Q ~ ~ ~ '~ I
~

~
o
~ .
~
j°
I g
J o ~
q'
I
~
.~
~ `~`- f
~- I ~~ I
UP I f0° COP.+i ~ I

i ~

~
I I
'
O ~ '.

I

~ N
O
I
W. ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I
O I ~
I

i

I ..
I

! ,

W

I.
~
I
'
I
O„ ~ I I
1
I I,

'~ ~

'~

~
I
~
~ ~ I l~
~. ~~ ~, ~'. I
O
~.I

I
'
'
~

I '
I
I
l ,
~

~ ~ I j~
~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~

' I
. I V

i

I
i ~ J

~
~

1
~ U
~'~
~
~I
~
~
i I ~:~

~ I.~O_

J
I
~~.
~I ~

~ .O.
I I
. ~

.. I 1

I ~. .

I ~.
O

;
i

f
~.
I
I
~
',
W..
~. }
W' ~
~ I D d l

I"
i~,
~
W I

~

I
I I

I
~~
i
I
~ ~,

jA

X

~I. I~ _~ ~

I
j I
~ I I
I I i .0~.
i.
N

DATES
~,~~~ ~„ ~TIME~
A
}
V
O N
>
O
O N
W
N
O N
W
O
O N
N
N
O N
N
O
O y

N
O ~

O
O N
O
Ut
O N
O
O
O
`0
N
O
`~
O
O
V
O
o
P
N
0
O~
O
0
(T
N
0
(h
O
0
A
Cii
o
A

g
W
N
o I
Q
'~ i O
('~
'_'~
p
z

n
n
O O O O O O O O O O O O O N A N O O G
D
~ N
_
0 '-'
zo
3

O O O O O N V N V a N N N `0 ~ O O x
p O A
Z
-~

t
Ui
O J
t
N
N ~
+
O
O O
t
~
Ut O
t
~,
O O
}
N
Ui p
}
~ I
~
I N
t
N
N N
t
O
O .N.
t
N
O ~
t
O
O p
t
N
O p
t
O
O ~O
t
Ch
O ~O
t
O
O m
t
OD
N O~
+
OD
O O~
t
Gi
O O~
t
O
O fli
}
N
O N
}
O
O P
t
N
O A
t
O
O W
t
N
O
~-
I (O(~
D
O

Z
Si z
N N N O 'p N O fNa N v O O O O O O O O O T ~ V W O
s
~ N
O=
Z ~
~
O O V P O N ~ O N
N r
tJ1 OD
.p `~
'~ O
O p•
OD A
O W
N A
O W
O V O yyy
T

N
N
}
N
N N
N
}
O
O ~

}
Uf
O J

}
O
O N
O
+
N
O N
O
}
O
O
`~
}
~
O
`~
}
O
O
OD
}
OD
N
O~
}
OD
O
P
}
U~
O
O~
}
O
O
N
}
N
O
tJ~
}
O
O
A
+
lli
O
A
}
O
O
i.J
}
N
O 7pr

0 ~

yy~O
F~ O
(7
--1

Z
~c
Z
W V tj1 N W ~ O A O A V W N O ry
D iA
..{ N_
O ?'
zo
3
N ~O ~O A O O O O W W A V A O Z
m
Z
Z
m
m
W
D
Z
m
Z
n
O
r
C
Z
v
O
z
O
Z
r
C
v
m
D
n
T
r
r
C
Z
v
m
70
n
c

n
^^c
`J

~, °~ z
. p
0.~~
~N ~..
O
~b
ti
~• w
O
n ~°_° "
° n ~ a
psn~,
~~~n
^/ '~
p ~ ~~ di
e
ern P 0O P
C11 0.. y T
~ ~b+ PM
R by ~ m
A Fr
~' !RY
p 1 O
~< ~°
M u T ~
~ p 7
;~
d ~~;
ti •a
M ~ N'+
A ~• 5• A
R w ~ R,e
i'h
~ p b
e ~
.n
^1 p P
P b
G+ m o.
~~ 8 ~
a
._:r
m
`J
O CT
~ ~ ~~
r
^~
` J
y ~
o
4-=~,
C
~l
x
m
m
z
C