20201841 Ver 1_Mitigation Technical Report_20201106

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
March 26, 2020
Ms. Brooke Wells
NC DEQ-Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3409-I
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Proposal--Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
Broad River Basin Cataloging Unit 03050105;Cleveland County, NC
In response to RFP 16-20190301 - Full Delivery Project
Dear Ms. Wells,
As an authorized representative of Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands), I am pleased to present to
the NC Division of Mitigation Services(DMS) the following proposal to provide stream and wetland
credits in the Broad River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03050105) in response to REP 16-20190301.This
proposal is a firm offer from Wildlands and remains open for acceptance by the NC Department of
Environmental Quality(DEQ) until September 22, 2020,which is 180 days from the closing date of the
above-referenced RFP.
As a fully licensed engineering firm, Wildlands will serve as the contracting entity and lead designer.The
key individuals on the Wildlands Team have worked together on numerous projects over multiple years
and will operate smoothly as a cohesive unit.
Wildlands is committed to creating an excellent ecological restoration project at the Bridgefork Dairy
Mitigation Site and is proposing 10,994 warm stream mitigation credits and 2.103 wetland mitigation
credits utilizing a combination of stream restoration,stream enhancement, stream preservation and
wetland restoration.
Wildlands' Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site submittal includes one signed,original Technical Proposal;
four photocopies of the Technical Proposal;one USB flash drive containing one electronic copy of the
Technical Proposal and the Project Site boundaries in ArcGIS format;one signed, original Cost Proposal;
and one photocopy of the Cost Proposal.All paper contained within this proposal is 100% recycled, 30%
post-consumer content.
With our diverse,yet unified team we offer the expertise, understanding, and commitment to ensure
this projects success.
Sincerely,
b,
Shawn Wilkerson, President
Wildlands Engineering,inc.IP)704.332.7754 • (F)704,332,3306 • 1430 South MintSt,Suite 104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

t,, ~STATE 0�{'!`►►►,
\•O My,Y 2O, !77s. ''V0
L.J '
1 •
his - sd J^"
► 4/10_iz,17-b s
►�'%'11%FRE Q ON*
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Request for Proposal #
16-20190301
For internal State agency processing, including tabulation of proposals in the Interactive Purchasing
System (IPS), please provide your company's Federal Employer Identification Number or alternate
identification number(e.g. Social Security Number). Pursuant to G.S. 132-1.10(b)this identification number
shall not be released to the public. This page will be removed and shredded, or otherwise kept
confidential, before the procurement file is made available for public inspection.
This page is to be filled out and returned with your proposal.
Failure to do so may subject your proposal to rejection.
ID Number:
56-0651376
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Vendor Name
Sealed, mailed or hand delivered responses ONLY will be accepted for this
solicitation.
Ver:4/22119

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
Refer ALL Inquiries regarding this RFP to: Request for Proposal#: 16-20190301
Brooke Wells Proposals will be publicly opened: March 26, 2020
B rooke.wells(a7ncdenr.qov
[phone]
Contract Type:Open Market Using Agency: Division of Mitigation Services
Commodity No. and Description: 962-73 Requisition No.: N/A
Restoration 1 Reclamation Services of Land and
other Properties
EXECUTION
In compliance with this Request for Proposals(REP), and subject to all the conditions herein,the undersigned Vendor offers and
agrees to furnish and deliver any or all items upon which prices are bid, at the prices set opposite each item within the time
specified herein. By executing this proposal, the undersigned Vendor certifies that this proposal is submitted competitively and
without collusion (G.S. 143-54), that none of its officers, directors, or owners of an unincorporated business entity has been
convicted of any violations of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes,the Securities Act of 1933,or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934(G.S. 143-59,2), and that it is not an ineligible Vendor as set forth in G.S. 143-59.1. False certification is a Class I felony.
Furthermore, by executing this proposal, the undersigned certifies to the best of Vendor's knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals are not presently debarred,suspended,proposed for debarment,declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered
transactions by any Federal or State department or agency. As required by G.S. 143-48.5,the undersigned Vendor certifies that
it,and each of its sub-Contractors for any Contract awarded as a result of this RFP,complies with the requirements of Article 2 of
Chapter 64 of the NC General Statutes, including the requirement for each employer with more than 25 employees in North
Carolina to verify the work authorization of its employees through the federal E-Verify system. G.S. 133-32 and Executive Order
24(2009)prohibit the offer to,or acceptance by,any State Employee associated with the preparing plans,specifications,estimates
for public Contract; or awarding or administering public Contracts; or inspecting or supervising delivery of the public Contract of
any gift from anyone with a Contract with the State, or from any person seeking to do business with the State_ By execution of this
response to the RFP,the undersigned certifies, for your entire organization and its employees or agents, that you are not aware
that any such gift has been offered, accepted, or promised by any employees of your organization.
Failure to execute/sign proposal prior to submittal shall render proposal invalid and it WILL BE REJECTED.
Late proposals cannot be accepted.
COMPLETE/FORMAL NAME OF VENDOR:
Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
STREET ADDRESS: P.O.BOX: ZIP:
1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104 n/a 28203
CITY&STATE&ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER; TOLL FREE TEL.NO:
Charlotte,NC 28203 [phone] n/a
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE{SEE INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS ITEM#12):
n/a
P. T NAME&TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING ON BEHALF OF VENDOR: FAX NUMBER:
• wn D.Wilkerson,President [phone]
V `DOR'S AUT 0 I IGNATURE': DATE: EMAIL:
— 03/26/2020 swilkerson[a]wildlandseng.com
■ -r valid for at least.180 days from date of proposal opening.After this time, any withdrawal of offer shall be made in writing,
effective upon receipt by the agency issuing this REP.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
if any or all parts of this proposal are accepted by the State of North Carolina,an authorized representative of the Department of
Environmental Quality shall affix his/her signature hereto and this document and all provisions of this Request for Proposal
along with the Vendor proposal response and the written results of any negotiations shall then constitute the written agreement
between the parties.A copy of this acceptance will be forwarded to the successful Vendor(s).
FOR STATE USE ONLY:Offer accept and Contract awarded this day of , 2020,as indicated on the
attached certification, by
(Authorized Representative of Department of Environmental Quality)
Ver;4/22/19

,•1
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL 5.RECAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
January 22, 2020
THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Full Delivery Projects to Provide Stream and Riparian
RFP NO. 16-20190301 RFP TITLE Wetland Mitigation Credits within the Cataloging Unit
03050105 of the Broad River Basin as described in the
Scope of Work
ADDENDUM NO. 1 USING
AGENCY: DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
PURCHASER BROOKE OPENING
WELLS DATE/TIME: MARCH 26, 2020 @ 2:00 P.M.
This correspondence serves as an addendum to the subject RFP. Your response to this RFP should be governed by the
content of the original RFP and the additional information provided in this addendum notice.
SECTION 1: Responses to Vendors Questions:
Questions and Answers:
Question#1: Section 3.2, Pg. 16; Item 17,Attachment B
Prohibited communication is discussed in Section 3.2 on page 16 and in Item 17 of Attachment B on page
30. At various points discussion is prohibited with any state employee, government employee, or private
individual during periods ranging from the evaluation period to the time the procurement is active. Please
clarify to whom (federal, state, or private) and when communication is prohibited.
Answer;
No discussions may occur within the Department, with anyone connected with the State of NC, or with
other vendors. Prohibited communication doesn't apply to Federal government.
Question#2: Paragraph 7. Non-Discrimination (b),Attachment C
Paragraph 7(b)of Attachment C, General Conditions of Contract requires the Vendor to"take all
necessary action to ensure its employee policies and procedures are consistent with Executive Order
#82,,,' The order applies to state agency employees. Is there an expectation that Vendors implement
this policy for Vendor's employees or that Vendors are aware that this policy exists for state agency
employees?
Answer:
Any vendor must follow law and regulations that applies to them.
Question#3: Section 5.3,Task 2 of the RFP references the December 4, 2019 Survey
Requirements for Full Delivery Projects document.
-11:11EQ)
Ormrtinnil
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of MltEgatfon Services
217 W.]onesStreet 1 1652 Mail Service Center l Raleigh,North Carallna 27699-1552
919.707,8976

Question#3 A)
Section 8 of the Survey and Boundary Marking Requirements states, "Access to the easement area must
be shown, with location and width depicted by a dotted line and note on the recorded plat."
Answer:
Section 8 of the Survey and Boundary Marking Requirements will be revised to say, "Access to the
easement area must be shown, with location and width depicted by a dotted line and noted on the
recorded plat."
Question#3 B)
If the landowner chooses the General Location Option in Section 11 Access Easement of the Deed of
Conservation Easement dated May 11, 2017, are we still required to show a specific dotted line on the
plat?
Answer:
No.
Question#4: Section 2.7, Part G, Current Ownership and Long-Term Protection, Pg. 10-11
The REP requires an option prepared in accordance with NCGS Chapter 4 7 G-2. Please confirm the state
wants all the requirements of 47G-2 in a Vendor's option agreement. For example,47G-2(b)(8) states
the option agreement must contain "[a] statement of the rights of the purchaser to cure a default, including
that the purchaser has the right to cure a default once in any 12-month period during the period of the
covered lease agreement."
Answer:
The REP requires proof that an option agreement per NCGS Chapter 47G-2 has been recorded in the
county for the time period specified in the RFP.
Question#5: Section 5.2
Section 5.2 states an "R Credit Target." Please clarify the intent of the credit target and provide rules for
site suitability.
Answer:
The Requested Credits are 5.00 and Credit Targets are 5 R. DMS needs 5.00 Riparian Wetland credits
resulting from in 100% restoration. DMS will consider other combinations of riparian wetland credits aside
from the target.
SECTION 2:
Check ONLY ONE of the following categories and if required, return one properly executed
copy of this addendum prior to bid opening time and date.
Bid has already been mailed. Changes resulting from this addendum are
attached.
Bid has already been mailed. NO CHANGES resulted from this addendum.
Bid has NOT been mailed and ANY CHANGES resulting from this addendum are
included in our offer.
PLEASE NOTE—THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
•rYi ii;•.i�.xl`iR ���
O!W,V 1 el FnWainienol OuN
North Carolina Department of Envlronmentai Quaky I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707,8976

SECTION 3:
Execute Addendum:
BIDDER: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ADDRESS(CITY& STATE): 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
03/26/2020
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: ' DATE:
Note: It is the offeror's responsibility to guarantee that the offer is received by the Issuing Agency
by the Opening DatelTime noted in the RFP.
Office Address of delivery by any other method
(special delivery,overnight,or any other carrier)
PROPOSAL NUMBER: 16-20190301
NC DEC) -DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
ATTN: BROOKE WELLS
217 WEST JONES STREET, SUITE 3409-I
RALEIGH, NC 27603
IT IS THE OFFER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTINUOUSLY CHECK FOR ADDENDA UP TO THE
LAST POSTED OPENING DATE/TIME AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL ADDENDA HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED, SIGNED AND RETURNED IF REQUIRED.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.
D,_E CI
o,wl,,,1 nrerniro,IT 1 J ooaen
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

PART D- Executive Summary
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) pleased to provide stream credits and wetland credits for the
service area for the Broad River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03050105 at the Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
(Site) in Cleveland County, NC.The Site proposes to provide 10,994 warm stream credits and 2.103
wetland credits for the specified service area.The project will involve restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of nine unnamed tributaries (Bridgefork Creek, UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT4A, UT5, UT6, and
UT6A) as well as wetland re-establishment and wetland rehabilitation. Wildlands has recorded options
to acquire approximately 43 acres of conservation easement on the Site.
The Site includes an active cattle farm, hay
pasture, horse boarding pastures, and wooded Actively Eroding Stream Bank at
and partially wooded incised streams. Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
Wildlands is committed to creating an °" , ,r .4 i!!i' ;' ` .
excellent ecological restoration project at the
Site.This project will improve water quality ,._; 1� x
and ecology through riparian buffer re- '. '""'" f -' `
establishment, stream and habitat restoration, ' ,;,
exclusion of livestock, restoration of wetlands, = x '"�'
p.
the installation of two Best Management
Practices (BMPs), and the removal of an '`=0•^} _,.4. p' ,:. ' -i,
existingfarm pond.This work will result in a ."-75 ,
decrease in nutrient and sediment loads fromolit ,`�N, ..� •_ * ' ;
the Site and improved aquatic and terrestrial T +f O. r O 1,. .
habitat.The specific evaluation criteria S ,�,," ,
outlined in the Division of Mitigation's (DMS's)
Request for Proposals will be met as summarized in Part G of this proposal.
In summary,the proposed Site includes:
• Generation of stream and wetland credits;
• Protection for stream channels from further channel manipulation and vegetation management for
agricultural purposes;
• Elimination of the water quality impacts of cattle access to streams and floodplains;
• Reduction of sediment and nutrient loadings by filtering overland runoff;
• Enhancement of habitat functions through channel restoration, channel enhancement, and riparian
wetland restoration;
• Restoration of channel-floodplain connectivity;
• Implementation of two proposed Best Management Practices (BMPs)
• Improvements to water quality within the NCDMS Targeted Resource Area for water quality;
• Improvements to hydrology within the NCDMS Targeted Resource Area for hydrology;
• Improvements to habitat within the NCDMS Targeted Resource Area for habitat;
• Conservation of approximately 43 acres of restored land in perpetuity.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.1

PART E-Corporate Background and Experience
1.0 Corporate Background
The Wildlands Team is a multidisciplinary group of professionals that brings together the expertise
necessary to create outstanding ecological restoration projects in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Wildlands, the primary offeror, is headquartered in Charlotte, NC.Wildlands has offices in Charlotte, NC;
Raleigh, NC; Asheville, NC; Charleston, SC; and Fairfax,VA. Our 70 employees dedicated to
environmental restoration have positioned Wildlands as a leader in ecosystem restoration in the
southeastern United States.
Wildlands has teamed with Kee Mapping&Surveying(Kee) for survey and easement services for the
Site. Kee is a well-established professional land surveying firm based out of Asheville, NC. Kee has
worked on a variety of projects with Wildlands staff and their experience includes geomorphic
assessment surveys, Global Positioning System (GPS) control for NC State Plane survey work, boundary
surveys for property net verification, easement platting, legal descriptions, and easement
monumentation. Early coordination and frequent communication ensures that everyone understands
their role in the project and can complete tasks in a timely and efficient manner.
Wildlands will consider one of the following five contractors specializing in
stream work or another qualified contractor: West Fork Linville River,constructed
• Baker Grading, based in Old Fort, NC by North State Environmental,Inc.
• Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc., based in Mount Airy, NC ,:i' • -.
41
• KBS Earthworks, based in Julian, NC " ✓_' .--
• Land Mechanic Designs, Inc., based in Willow Spring, NC
• North State Environmental, Inc., based in Winston Salem, NC
__ 'S - _
Ifij-
2.0 Ability to Complete all Phases of the Proposal _ _"',":,"
Wildlands' success is owed to the skills and abilities of its diverse and
talented staff. Wildlands' staff expertise includes planning, ecology, biology, economics, civil
engineering, real estate,AutoCAD, Geographic Information System (GIS), land management,
environmental consulting, and habitat construction. Our collection of professionals allows for a seamless
approach to planning, permitting, design, construction, and management of restoration projects. We
fully understand the permitting process at the federal, state, and local level. Wildlands has five NC
Certified Floodplain Managers (CFMs) on staff to address local, state, and FEMA floodplain permitting
requirements. We have extensive experience with categorical exclusions,401/404 permitting, and
sediment and erosion control plans.
3.0 Similar Projects
Wildlands has completed numerous projects involving stream restoration, wetland restoration, and
mitigation banking. Several of these projects are summarized below
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site, Stanly County, NC—Wildlands
tii . •,,,,� performed ecological restoration work at a site near Albemarle, NC.The
9 1, ,r � , full-delivery project delivered 6,415 stream credits on Scaly Bark Creek
t4f.; ' ;:, and six unnamed tributaries in the Yadkin River basin for DMS.The
� ro ect included Cate orical exclusion documentation existin
, ` ` p 1 g g
r; conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation, 40
easement
' am' I, . acquisition, restoration design, permitting, construction, and five years
of post-construction monitoring. Wildlands successfully completed
CLOMR and LOMR packages for this project.This project was
successfully closed out in 2016.
iviie Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.1

-_ ar Lyle Creek Mitigation Site, Catawba County, NC-Wildlands completed
ecological restoration work at a site northwest of Lake Norman in
a Catawba County, NC.The project provided 5,571 stream credits and 7.0
wetland credits on unnamed tributaries to Lyle Creek in the Catawba
411 River basin.The project included categorical exclusion documentation,
_ existing conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation
•
easement acquisition, stream and wetland restoration design,
permitting, construction, and post-construction monitoring.
Construction was completed in 2012.This project was successfully
closed out in 2019.
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site, Cleveland County, NC-This project will
provide approximately 25,836 stream credits in the Broad River basin.
The project includes stream enhancement and restoration design, water
quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) design, permitting,
construction, and five years of post-construction monitoring. Nine
s y }�� storm water BMPs have been implemented to treat agricultural runoff.
b � � - This agricultural watershed is impacted by bank erosion and loss of
riparian buffer. Wildlands negotiated credit development with the IRT
, ; to recognize a lighter touch approach directed at distinct functional
stressors within the system. Construction was completed in spring 2018
and the project is now in the second year of post-construction
monitoring.
Owl's Den Mitigation Site, Lincoln County, NC-Wildlands is developing
a full-delivery project in Lincoln County on two unnamed tributaries to
Howards Creek.The project is expected to provide 2,400 stream credits
in the Catawba River basin and 8.0 wetland credits via wetland re-
• eVX >, establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement.The project includes
• �� .9 4 categorical exclusion documentation, existing conditions assessment,
landowner coordination, conservation easement acquisition, stream
and wetland restoration design, permitting, construction, and seven
years of post-construction monitoring. Detailed hydrologic modeling
was completed to study wetland-groundwater connections.This project
is in the fourth year of post-construction monitoring.
Henry Fork Mitigation Site, Catawba County, NC-This project,which
involves the reclamation of a former golf course,will deliver 4,500
> 'a stream credits and 4.0 wetland credits through restoration and
. � enhancement of streams and rehabilitation, re-establishment, and
enhancement of wetlands. In addition, outside of the credited activities,
• ' z y Wildlands purchased the expansive floodplain of the Henry Fork river,
Ali
;x which was placed in permanent conservation easement at no credit as a
value-added benefit of the project.The project is currently in the fourth
- • - r; year of post-construction monitoring.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.2

Hopewell Mitigation Site,Randolph County, NC-Wildlands is
performing ecological restoration work for this stream mitigation site,
which includes restoration, enhancement, and preservation of a total of
12,308 existing linear feet (LF) of perennial and intermittent stream. By
closeout,the project will deliver 7,389 stream credits in the Yadkin River
Basin.The project includes categorical exclusion documentation,
existing conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation
easement acquisition, stream restoration, wetland restoration,
permitting, construction, and seven years of post-construction
monitoring. Construction was completed in 2014.This project is
currently in the sixth year of post-construction monitoring.
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site, Union County, NC-Wildlands is
developing a full-delivery project in rural Union County on Norkett
_ Branch and four tributaries.The project is expected to provide 10,098
stream credits for DMS in the Yadkin River basin.The project includes
existing site assessment, conservation easement acquisition, permitting,
stream restoration design, construction, and seven years of post-
. '. construction monitoring of geomorphic stability and vegetation.
Detailed hydraulic modeling was completed for CLOMR and LOMR
approvals.Two stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) were
constructed to treat headwater agricultural runoff and will provide
stream credits.This project is currently in the sixth year of post-
construction monitoring.
sr Banner Farm Mitigation Site, Henderson County, NC-Wildlands is
performing ecological restoration work on this project located in Mills
• 1 River, NC.The project will provide 6,294 stream credits and 34.0
a „ wetland credits in the French Broad River basin.The project will create
- significant ecological improvement through restoration of aquatic and
r - terrestrial habitats.The project will also decrease nutrient and sediment
loads from the watershed by eliminating severe bank erosion,
:itt--**,: connecting the onsite streams to their floodplains, restoring native
"` riparian buffers, restoring natural wetland hydrology to previously
drained areas, and by increasing filtering of overland runoff from
agricultural fields through wetland areas and protected buffers.The
project is currently in design and construction is expected to begin in
August of 2020.
. ,;",tc.f Shake Rag Mitigation Site, Madison County, NC-The project will
�:.; provide 6,656 cold stream credits in the French Broad River basin.The
'" project is creating significant ecological enhancement within the project
r stream corridors by daylighting multiple reaches that were previously
•
buried for agricultural purposes. Project activities also include removal
`. -;` of an inline pond, restoration of aquatic and terrestrial riparian habitats
along headwater streams including the daylighting and protection of
! ?i'9•- tea;.. ;. z �'3h
r< < multiple seeps, and the re-establishment of a natural step-pool stream
# "` morphology within project streams.The project will also decrease
nutrient and sediment loads from the watershed by replacing ford
crossings with countersunk culverts that facilitate aquatic passage, and
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.3

through restoring native riparian buffers and creation of a step SPSC to
treat upland runoff.The project also re-naturalized several farm roads,
removed utility poles and lines from the project corridor and treated
multiple invasive species infestations. Construction was completed in
December 2019 and as-built activities are underway.
4.0 Lead Consultant and Team Members
Wildlands is a licensed engineering firm in NC and will act as prime consultant for this contract. Staff
from our Charlotte, NC office will complete this project. Wildlands has teamed with Kee to offer the best
possible team to DMS. As indicated above in Section 1.0,Wildlands will select a specialty stream
contractor from our provided list of qualified firms.
LEAD CONSULTANT
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. - Headquarters
Charlotte, NC Office Location
elk!,
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
WILDLANDS (P) 704.332.7754 (F) 704.332.3306
E N GI NEE RI NG
Firm Contact:
Shawn Wilkerson, President;[e-mail]
North Carolina S-Corporation
Federal Identification Number: 56-0651376
TEAM MEMBERS
Kee Mapping and Surveying, PA
P.O. Box 2566
Asheville, NC 28802
e� (P) 828.575.9021
MAPPING& SURVEYING Firm Contact:
Phillip Brad Kee, PLS; [e-mail]
Services to be Provided: Professional surveying services
5.0 Project Manager Experience
Mr. Neuhaus serves as a water resources engineer in Wildlands' Asheville office. He has ten years of
experience working on a variety of projects including stream and wetland restoration, stormwater
management, erosion and sediment control, hydrologic modeling, and groundwater modeling. Mr.
Neuhaus' duties include field data collection, site analysis, design development, preparation of
construction plans, earthwork estimation, construction administration, and post-construction
monitoring of mitigation sites. He also provides hydrologic modeling and water budget analysis including
groundwater modeling for wetland restoration projects.Additional information on Mr. Neuhaus'
experience is provided below in Section 7.0.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.4

6.0 Project Approach
The Wildlands Team takes a holistic, integrated approach to site restoration.The following text outlines
some key aspects of our multi-disciplinary project approach. Site-specific project plans are further
described in Part G of this proposal.
6.1 Site Selection
The Wildlands Team carefully selects project sites where ecological restoration can be maximized. Our sites are reviewed by our
environmental scientists and engineers during the selection process
to ensure that ecological uplift can be achieved within regulatory � �f��`
parameters related to floodplain management, protected species, 4 f r
and existing wetland resources. We consult with the existing $" y
landowners to explain the restoration process and the conservation 4r,
k = ,
easement conditions. We review the site with our contractor to a
identify potential construction challenges and opportunities. 5 z}
-: ,R- ,..
6.2 Property Owner Coordination
Property owner coordination begins during the site selection stage and continues throughout the
project. We meet with families to understand the existing and future land use plans for the site. We
work to fully explain the restoration process and review site plans at the conceptual design stage and
final design stage with the property owners to make sure that their concerns are addressed. Our project
manager is the point of contact throughout the project so that the property owners always know who
can answer any questions that may arise.
6.3 Contractor Coordination
Wildlands draws on our contractor's construction expertise early in the project planning phase. We
consult with our contractor so that the project can be designed and constructed in an efficient and cost-
effective manner. We work to identify on-site materials that are native to the existing ecosystem and
that should be incorporated into the restoration project to best mimic natural systems for the site
locale. For example, cobble material embedded in excavated material on mountain stream sites can be
sorted and used for riffle construction. We also know that coordination and flexibility during
construction is the key to a successful restoration site.
6.4 Site Assessment
Numerous methods of assessment are used to quantify and qualify
the site and upstream watershed's stability, nutrient loads, sediment �.'.
transport, hydrologic and hydraulic properties, plant and animal
habitat, ecology, soil conditions, and functional uplift potential. Our
assessment is carried out by surveyors trained in natural channel
^ .'
assessment and by field scientists and engineers trained in stream � , -- a ;
and wetland assessment and design who know what characteristics to
look for that will aid in design. Wildlands looks for predictors of future
stability problems, such as upstream development and concentrated overland flow paths.
6.5 Permitting
A project's schedule can be completely disrupted if the permitting for the project is not performed
correctly.The Wildlands Team understands the critical steps necessary for acquiring these permits in a
timely and efficient manner. Methods used to ensure a rapid permitting process include on-site
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.5

meetings with the various permitting agency representatives prior to design, as well as staying up-to-
date on the regulations associated with ecosystem restoration.These steps allow for the submittal of a
thorough and accurate permitting application for our projects.
6.6 Site Design
Once the existing conditions are documented and evaluated,the preferred alternative selected, and
base-mapping developed, a design discharge range is selected based on the project goals. Natural
channel design parameters will be developed based on reference reach data, hydraulic modeling, and
sediment transport assessment.Wildlands has five CFMs on staff who can evaluate design options to
optimize floodplain function and minimize off-site adverse flood elevation impacts. During the
preliminary design the plan view channel location is set, cross-sections for riffles and pools are designed,
and in-stream habitat and grade control structures are located. General grading limits, details, and
easement locations are included at this stage. Property owner input and contractor coordination help to
assure that the proposed design meets the multi-faceted design goals.
6.7 Construction
The Wildlands Team is familiar with the policies, procedures, and practices ‘ t('� ,,:y
necessary to construct natural channel design and wetland restoration " 4. i
projects. Wildlands has provided construction administration and observation -
services for over 83 miles of stream work and 459 acres of wetland work. A
6.8 Monitoring °` f
Monitoring is an important component to any stream restoration or
enhancement work.The Wildlands Team has experience in both developing monitoring plans for
mitigation projects and in implementing those plans. Our monitoring plan experience includes as-built
surveys and determining whether the project has met its success criteria after the required time period.
7.0 Key Personnel Resumes (Prime and Subconsultant)
This section provides resumes for the Wildlands project manager and the managing staff for our survey
subcontractor on this project.An additional description of the Wildlands project manager's abilities is
provided in Section 5.0. Resumes for remaining personnel on the team are provided in Part F.
Eric Neuhaus, PE—Wildlands Project Manager
Mr. Neuhaus has ten years of experience in executing a wide variety of water resources planning and
engineering projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Project Manager; Design
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer(NC)
TOTAL YEARS EXPERIENCE: 10 years
EDUCATION: MS, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, 2013
BS, Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, 2010
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rogen Level I—III, 2015-2017
River Course 101 -Stream Morphology and Assessment, 2013
River Course 201 - Natural Channel Design Principles, 2013
HEC-RAS (ASCE), 2013
Stream Restoration Design Techniques, 2012
Sediment Transport Fundamentals, 2012
Stormwater Design and Erosion and Sediment Control
Techniques, 2009
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.6

PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILc. PROJECT ROLE
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits;
Henderson County, NC 34 wetland credits Project Manager
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 6,800 stream credits; Project Manager
Lincoln County, NC 12 wetland credits
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; Design; Modeling;
Lincoln County, NC 8 wetland credits Construction Administration
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Construction Administration
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Design; Modeling;
Catawba County, NC 4 wetland credits Construction Administration
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Engineering Support
Brad Kee, PLS—Surveyor Subconsultant
With over 20 years of experience in land surveying, Mr. Kee has been a leader in providing high quality
site surveys for clients ranging from land developers to conservation agencies. Mr. Kee is experienced in
geomorphic assessment surveys, conservation easement surveys, boundary surveys for property net
verification, GPS control for NC State Plane survey work, easement platting, legal descriptions, and
easement monumentation. For projects large and small, Kee Mapping & Surveying uses the same care
and integrity to achieve accurate documentation.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Professional Land Surveyor NC L-4647
PROJECT EXPERIENCE(WILDLANDS PROJECTS) PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Topographic and
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits As-Built Survey
Shake Rag Mitigation Site Topographic and
Madison County, NC 6,472 stream credits As-Built Survey
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; Topographic and
Henderson County, NC 34 wetland credits As-Built Survey
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream Restoration Project Topographic and
Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits As-Built Survey
Candy Creek Mitigation Site 15,456 stream credits Project Surveyor;
Guilford County, NC Easement Plats
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; Project Surveyor;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 wetland credits Easement Plats
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site 10,098 stream credits Project Surveyor;
Union County, NC Easement Plats
DBE/HUB Participation
Three of our potential contractors are woman-owned businesses: Carolina Environmental Contracting,
Inc., Land Mechanic Designs, Inc., and North State Environmental, Inc.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.7

PART F- Project Organization
1.0 Organizational Chart
The following illustrates the organization of personnel that will be assigned to this project.
Principal-in-Charge Project Manager QA/QC Manager
Shawn Wilkerson Eric Neuhaus,PE Jake McLean,PE,CFM
Categorical Exclusions Existing Conditions Survey Easements Design
Andrea Eckardt Ian Eckardt,PWS Andrea Eckardt Eric Neuhaus,PE
Ella Wickliff Ella Wickliff Ian Hazelhoff Christine Blackwelder
Brad Kee,PLS Brad Kee,PL5 Josh Short,El
Permitting Construction Monitoring
Ian Eckardt,PWS Kristi Suggs
Eric Neuhaus, PE Ben McGuire Ella Wickliff
Henry Reed
■ WILDLANDS Charlotte,NC Office Engineering services will be
performed by employees of
licensed corporate entities.
■ WILDLANDS Asheville,NC Office
■ KEE MAPPING&SURVEYING Asheville,NC Office
2.0 Qualifications and Experience
Brief resumes presenting the qualifications, experience, and assigned project responsibilities of each
project team member are presented on the following pages. Resumes for the Wildlands project
manager, Mr. Eric Neuhaus, and for the project manager for Kee were presented in Part E, Section 7.0.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.1

Shawn Wilkerson
Mr. Wilkerson has 22 years of professional experience in water resources,focusing on surface water
hydrology and restoration. He has managed and designed a diverse range of projects, including wetland/
Best Management Practice (BMP) construction and monitoring, stream restoration and enhancement,
and watershed planning for flood control and water quality improvements. Mr.Wilkerson plays a key
role in initial site evaluation for mitigation and conservation easement acquisition. In the roles of
principal-in-charge or project manager, Mr. Wilkerson has overseen and managed design and
construction for more than 34 miles of stream restoration projects. Several of his key projects have
involved mitigation banking and turn-key mitigation solutions. In his role at Wildlands, he also serves as
the leader of a 70-person team of scientists and engineers that focuses on ecological restoration and
assessments. Mr.Wilkerson focuses on integrating ecologically responsible projects within the
constraints of impacted landscapes while using his experience and education to manage and create
innovative and successful projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: President
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Principal-in-Charge
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: NC Real Estate Broker, 2000
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22 years
EDUCATION: MS, Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
1998
BA, English Literature,Appalachian State University, 1993
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rosgen Levels I through IV, 1998-2003
PSMJ Project Manager Boot Camp, 2004, 2014
Mecklenburg Habitat Assessment Protocol Training, 2000
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Principal-in-Charge
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits;
Henderson County, NC 34 wetland credits Principal-in-Charge
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Project Manager
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Principal-in-Charge
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Principal-in-Charge
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Principal-in-Charge
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site Principal-in-Charge; Project
Stanly County, NC 6,415 stream credits Manager; Conservation
Easement Acquisition
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,571 stream credits; Principal-in-Charge;
Catawba County, NC 7.0 wetland credits Conservation Easement
Acquisition
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.2

Jake McLean, PE, CFM
Mr. McLean has 18 years of experience in ecological restoration, stormwater management design,
planning and modeling, floodplain management, and hydrologic/hydraulic analysis.At Wildlands, he is
responsible for managing stream restoration and stormwater quality BMP projects, performing
hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to support natural channel design, performing floodplain
management consulting and modeling, and preparation of construction documents. Mr. McLean has
experience with municipal, non-profit, state and federal restoration and stormwater projects. He has
extensive experience developing and overseeing compensatory mitigation projects from initial site
identification through construction and monitoring.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: QA/QC Manager
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer; Certified Floodplain Manager
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 18 years
EDUCATION: MS, Civil Engineering,Auburn University, 2002
BS, Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 2000
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NCSU Department of Biological &Agricultural Engineering:
River Course 1-3, 2005-2006
Stream Restoration Construction Training, 2006
Stormwater BMP Academy, 2005
Bioretention/Stormwater Wetlands, 2005
Stormwater BMP Inspection and Maintenance, 2012
HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling, 2011
Geomorphic Assessment Workshop, 2006
Natural Channel Design Workshop, 2006
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Project Manager
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; 4 wetland credits Project Manager
Catawba County, NC
Banner Farm Mitigation Site
Henderson County, NC 6,294 stream credits; 34 wetland credits Design
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site
Cleveland County, NC 25,836 stream credits; 9 BMPs Design
Candy Creek Mitigation Site 15,456 stream credits Design
Guilford County, NC
Western Stream Initiative Multiple projects totaling 15,000 LF of
Multiple Counties in Western NC restoration Design
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.3

Andrea Eckardt
Ms. Eckardt has 22 years of experience in watershed management, environmental planning, permitting,
and geographic information systems (GIS). She currently serves as a senior environmental planner for
Wildlands. She specializes in environmental permitting, watershed management, project development
and implementation, citizen/agency facilitation, grant writing, conservation easement coordination, and
GIS mapping. Ms. Eckardt has experience with municipal and state improvement projects, school and
university improvement projects, non-profit improvement projects, and private development projects.
Ms. Eckardt has facilitated State Property Office coordination of easements for 484 acres of
conservation easements in NC.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Planner
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Categorical Exclusions; Conservation Easement Acquisition Lead
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22 years
EDUCATION: MS, Environmental Science, Applied Ecology, Indiana
University, 1996
BS, Biology, Wake Forest University, 1994
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Consultant Regulatory Workshop, 2007
Financial Benefits of Conservation Easements: Conservation
Programs and Tax Incentives for NC Landowners, 2006
Project Manager Boot Camp, 2005, 2014
Natural Resource Leadership Institute, 2001
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Various Full-Delivery Projects 26 full-delivery Categorical Exclusion;
Multiple Counties in NC projects Conservation
Easement Acquisition
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream
Cleveland County, NC credits; 9 BMPs Mitigation Plan Lead
Project Manager
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site 4,900 stream credits; (existing condition
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 wetland credits
and design phase)
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 3,489 stream credits; Project Manager
Union County, NC 8.5 wetland credits (conceptual phase)
Burnetts Chapel Mitigation Site 407,649 riparian
Guilford County, NC buffer credits Project Manager
Box Creek Wilderness Area Stream Mitigation Bank
Rutherford County, NC 42,735 stream credits Project Manager
Lone Oak Mitigation Bank 40,462 stream credits Permitting; Banking
Albemarle County, VA Instrument
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.4

Ella Wickliff
Ms. Wickliff serves as an environmental scientist for Wildlands. Her background includes biologic and
geomorphic surveys, hydrologic monitoring, and surface water quality sampling. At Wildlands, she
performs various aspects of stream and wetland monitoring including geomorphic assessment,
biological and habitat assessment, vegetation assessment, data processing, and GIS mapping.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Categorical Exclusions; Existing Conditions Survey; Monitoring
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 2 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
2018
BS, Environmental Science, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, 2016
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Wetland Delineation Training, Richard Chinn, 2019
River Course 101: Stream Morphology and Assessment, 2019
Surface Water Identification Training and Certification, 2018
NCDWR Macroinvertebrate Qual 4 Method
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 1 4.0 wetland credits
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; Monitoring
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 wetland credits
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 6,800 stream credits; Existing Conditions
Lincoln County, NC 1 12 wetland credits Assessment
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Monitoring
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Monitoring
Cleveland County, NC 1 9 BMPs
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream 25,974 stream credits Monitoring
Restoration Project Charlotte, NCI
Alexander Farm Mitigation Site 4 058 stream credits Existing Conditions
Alexander County, NC Assessment
Double H Farms Mitigation Site 6,500 stream credits; Existing Conditions
Alleghany County, NC 1.7 wetland credits Assessment
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
kail
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.5

Ian Eckardt, Pws
Mr. Eckardt has 15 years of experience in stream geomorphic assessments, stream classification,
wetland delineation, protected species surveys, sediment sampling and analysis,water quality
monitoring, groundwater monitoring, surveying, and vegetation assessment. He currently serves as an
environmental scientist for Wildlands Engineering and is responsible for regulatory permitting, agency
correspondence, wetland delineations, geomorphic surveys and assessments, protected species surveys,
and post-construction monitoring.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Existing Conditions Survey; Permitting
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Wetland Scientist
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 15 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
2007
BA, Geology, NC State University, 2001
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NC SAM Certificate Training, 2017
Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, 2013
Advanced Problems in Hydric Soil Evaluation, 2013
Rosgen Level I, 2013
Surface Water Identification Training and Certification, 2013
NC WAM Certificate Training, 2010
Management of Invasive and Exotic Vegetation in Riparian
Areas, 2009
North Carolina Rare Plant Identification Workshops, 2007 &
2011
Delineation of Piedmont and Coastal Plain Jurisdictional
Wetlands, 2007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site 2,746 stream credits;
Union County, NC 8.1 wetland credits Existing Conditions Assessment
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Existing Conditions Assessment
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Existing Conditions Assessment;
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits Permitting
Hopewell Mitigation Site Existing Conditions Assessment;
Randolph County, NC 7,389 stream credits Categorical Exclusion; Permitting;
Monitoring
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site Existing Conditions Assessment;
10,098 stream credits Categorical Exclusion; Permitting;
Union County, NC
Monitoring
Existing Conditions Assessment;
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; Categorical Exclusion; Permitting;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 wetland credits
Monitoring
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
Stanly County, NC 6,415 stream credits Monitoring
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.6

Ian Hazelhoff
Mr. Hazelhoff is an experienced land manager and conservation planner and is passionate about land
remediation. He is responsible for identification, landowner negotiation, and closure of conservation
easements and land use agreements on riparian corridors in North Carolina, Virginia, and South Carolina
for the purpose of stream,wetland, and buffer mitigation projects. In addition, Mr. Hazelhoff is
responsible for nutrient and buffer credit sales from existing Wildlands-owned mitigation banks.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Land Acquisition & Mitigation Development
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Conservation Easement Acquisitions
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: NC Realtor° Broker
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 6 years
EDUCATION: BS, Biology, Sewanee: The University of the South, 2013
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS I PROJECT ROLE
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 6,800 stream credits; Conservation Easement
Lincoln County, NC 12.0 wetland credits Acquisition; Broker
Huntsman Mitigation Site Conservation Easement
Wilkes County, NC 6,000 stream credits Acquisition; Broker
East Buffalo Mitigation Bank Site Conservation Easement
Graham County, NC 4,051 stream credits Acquisition; Broker
Bug Headwaters Mitigation Site 1 Conservation Easement
Wilkes County, NC 7,608 stream credits Acquisition; Broker
Oak Hill Dairy Mitigation Site 4,630 stream credits; Conservation Easement
Gaston County, NC 7.6 wetland credits Acquisition; Broker
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
kail
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.7

Christine Blackwelder
Ms. Blackwelder is a technical leader in stream restoration and her duties include assessment and
design of ecological restoration projects, as well as conducting internal technical trainings. Ms.
Blackwelder has 17 years of professional experience in environmental restoration and is skilled in
watershed assessment methodology, geomorphic assessments, natural channel design, bid document
development, construction management, and monitoring techniques.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Design
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 17 years
EDUCATION: BA, Environmental Science, University of Virginia, 2002
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Sediment Transport in Stream Assessment and Design, 2014
Rosgen Level I - IV, 2006-2008
Project Manager Boot Camp, 2008, 2014
Aquatic Insect Collection Protocols for Stream Mitigation
Projects, 2006
Stream Restoration Construction Training, 2005
Erosion and Sediment Control Inspector, 2003
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Reviewer, 2003
OSHA 10 Hour Safety Training, 2009
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits;
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits Environmental Scientist
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream Assistant Project Manager;
Restoration Project Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits Design; Construction
Administration
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Proposal QA/QC
Double H Farms Mitigation Site 6,500 stream credits;
Alleghany County, NC 1.7 wetland credits Project Manager; Lead Scientist
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site 12,900 stream credits;
Yadkin County, NC 8.0 wetland credits Lead Environmental Scientist
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Alamance County, NC 9 BMPs Project Scientist
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,571 stream credits; Assistant Project Manager;
Catawba County, NC 7.0 wetland credits Design; Construction
Administration
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.8

Josh Short, El
Mr. Short has two years of experience with water resources, specifically dealing with water quality
improvement projects. He has led field and laboratory activities that integrated wetland vegetation and
ecological processes to promote improved water quality. Additionally, he has assisted with public
education and outreach programs related to stormwater management. His duties at Wildlands include
existing conditions assessment, construction administration, design assistance, and GIS mapping of
ecological restoration and stormwater projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Designer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Design; Permitting
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Engineer in Training
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 2 years
EDUCATION: BS Biosystems Engineering, Emphasis in Ecological Engineering,
Clemson University, 2017
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: River Course 302— HEC-RAS for Stream Restoration, 2019
River Course 201— Natural Channel Design Principles, 2018
River Course 101—Stream Morphology and Assessment, 2018
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS ' PROJECT ROLE
Double H Farms Mitigation Site 6,500 stream credits; Designer
Alleghany County, NC 1.7 wetland credits
Alexander Farm Mitigation Site 4,058 stream credits I Existing Conditions Assessment;
Alexander County, NC Designer
Plantation Branch Mitigation Site
Surry County, NC 5,045 stream credits Designer
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream
Restoration Project Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits Construction Administration
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, NC 5,987 stream credits Existing Condition Assessment
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Alamance County, NC 9 BMPs Plan Production
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Monitoring
Cannon Creek Mitigation Site
Berkeley County,SC 16,241 stream credits Monitoring
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.9

Ben McGuire
Mr. McGuire has seven years of experience in stream construction, erosion and sediment control, and
BMP projects. He has assisted with several grant funded projects for water quality in Western North
Carolina. Mr. McGuire has experience with construction administration, surveying, monitoring, project
acquisition, landowner relations, and permitting.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Construction Manager
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Construction Administration
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 7 years
EDUCATION: BS, Environmental Studies, University of North Carolina at
Wilmington, 2011
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rosgen Level I—Applied Fluvial Geomorphology, 2015
NCDOT Erosion and Sedimentation Control/Stormwater
Certification
BMP Inspection and Maintenance Certification
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Key Mill Mitigation Site, Construction
Surry County, NC 5,987 stream credits Administration
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream Restoration Construction
Project Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits Administration
Little Pine Creek II Stream &Wetland 4,156 LF of streams; Construction
Restoration Project: Redesign
Alleghany County, NC 5.4 acres of wetlands Administration
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site 12,900 stream credits; Construction
Yadkin County, NC 8.0 wetland credits Administration
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site Monitoring;
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Maintenance
Agony Acres Mitigation Site 6,488 stream credits; Monitoring
Guilford County, NC 130,680 buffer credits
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site 18,527 stream credits; Monitoring
Johnston County, NC 57.0 wetland credits
Maney Farm Mitigation Site
Chatham County, NC 4,748 stream credits Monitoring
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.10

Kristi Suggs
Ms. Suggs currently serves as a senior environmental scientist and the monitoring lead coordinator for
Wildlands. She has over 16 years of experience in watershed management, environmental planning and
permitting, and GIS. Her expertise includes geomorphic assessments, stream classification,wetland
delineation, biological and habitat assessment, protected species surveys, sediment sampling and
analysis,water quality monitoring, groundwater monitoring, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling,
vegetation assessment, GIS mapping, and post-construction monitoring.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Monitoring Lead
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 16 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth and Environmental Resource Management, University
of South Carolina, 2005
BS,Animal Veterinary Science, West Virginia University, 1995
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NC Wetland Assessment Method Training Certification, 2016
NC Stream Assessment Method Training Certification, 2016
NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer Training, 2015
Mussel Identification Workshop-Atlantic Slope Species of NC
and SC, 2015
Piedmont Rare Species and Mafic Rock Communities Workshop,
2014
2011 Rare Plant& Community Identification Workshop, 2011
Surface Water Identification and Training Class, V.4.0, 2010
Wetland Delineation and Jurisdictional Determination: Post
Rapanos-Carabel, 2008
Stream Restoration Design Introduction, Existing Conditions
Analysis, and Preliminary Design, 2007
Intermittent and Perennial Stream Identification for Regulatory
Applications, 2007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Monitoring
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs Monitoring
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Monitoring
Hopewell Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC 7,389 stream credits Monitoring
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream 25,974 stream credits As-built monitoring report
Restoration Project Charlotte, NC
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.11

Henry Reed
Mr. Reed is serving as an environmental scientist with two years of experience. His current role at
Wildlands includes many aspects of stream and wetland monitoring including surveying, vegetation
assessment, invasive species identification and control, water quality monitoring, and sediment
sampling and analysis.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Monitoring
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 2 years
EDUCATION: BS, Geology, Clemson University, 2018
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: River Course 101: Stream Morphology Assessment, 2020
Wetland Delineation Training, Richard Chinn, 2019
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS 1 PROJECT ROLE
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream 25,974 stream credits As-built monitoring report
Restoration Project Charlotte, NC
Huntsman Mitigation Site
Wilkes County, NC 6,000 stream credits Monitoring
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Monitoring
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Cleveland County, NC 1 9 BMPs Monitoring
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 3,489 stream credits;
Union County, NC 1 8.5 wetland credits Monitoring
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site 10,098 stream credits Geomorphic &Water Quality
Union County, NC Monitoring
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 1 4.0 wetland credits
Oak Hill Dairy Mitigation Site 4,630 stream credits;
Monitoring
Gaston County, NC 1 7.6 wetland credits
Hopewell Mitigation Site 7,389 stream credits Monitoring
Randolph County, NC I 1
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART F
kail
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.12

Part G -Technical Approach
The Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
(Site) is in Cleveland County - '
approximately 2.5 miles northwest of `I l, ' 'Sr-
_ h' ..a.�' S' 'f'�
Kings Mountain and approximately 8.8 : . ,
IL
miles southeast of Shelby(Figure 1). ---
The project includes restoration, .. "' y' ::•F". A
enhancement, and preservation of ., • .-.7 ;�
project streams.Additionally,the . „ 4, 4.• --,
project proposes to re-establish and r' �'
rehabilitate riparian floodplain ` � c'ti''fi'
wetlands and implement two best "'
management practices (BMPs) ��. �.,
upstream of headwater tributaries. The �, .}A, {
project is located within the Hydrologic fi '�
J_j
Unit Code (HUC) 0305010510020 and is
being submitted for mitigation credit in
the Broad River Basin Catalog Unit Aerial Photo of Tortuous Meanders, Maintained Riparian
Buffer,and Active Stream Erosion at Bridgefork Dairy
03050105.The site is within catchment
Mitigation Site
12034601 identified as a Targeted
Resource Area (TRA) for hydrology, habitat, and water quality by the NC Department of Environmental
Quality Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ DMS) as shown in Figure 1.
The Site contains several unnamed tributaries (UTs)to Potts Creek, which have been given names for
this proposal (Bridgefork Creek, UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT4A, UT5, UT6, and UT6A).The Site is located
within DWR Subbasin 03-08-05. Bridgefork Creek flows west offsite for approximately 1,875 linear feet
before joining Potts Creek, which ultimately drains to Buffalo Creek downstream of King's Mountain
Reservoir.
1.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The major goals of the proposed stream and wetland mitigation project are to provide ecological and
water quality enhancements to the Broad River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the
site level.
Site stressors include stream incision, active
stream erosion including mass wasting, Cattle Run, Eroding Bank, Maintained Buffer,and
Invasive Vegetation at Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
maintenance and drainage of wetland areas for
agriculture, livestock access, poor quality _' _',
buffers, areas of limited to absent bedform '-,
diversity, and active degradation of headwater
stream systems. F1 '''-
Specific enhancements to water quality,
hydrology, and habitat are outlined in Table - ". . ,. ..
G.1. Watershed ecological uplift potential and ,,, ', " 'g
specific calculations supporting these goals andg14- " Y: . e �- --L -� t
objectives outlined in Section 3. 'V.Y � ' '.- '' �':
viie Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.1

Table G.1 Water Quality,Hydrology,and Habitat Goals of the Mitigation Project
Site Functional Functional Uplift Potential Site Goal Site Objective
Stressors
High—Many of the riparian zones on site • Convert active livestock pasture to
are not forested and the forested forested riparian buffers along all
Water Quality: riparian zones either have grazed Restore,enhance,and Site streams and within j roect
Non-functioning understory or are overrun with invasive supplement native wetlands. p
riparian buffer vegetation.The project will include floodplain vegetation • Protect and enhance existing
replanting of riparian zones with native
vegetation and treatment of understory forested riparian buffers.
• Treat invasive species.
invasive vegetation.
Improve the stability
High—Significant sources of sediment of stream channels.
include severely eroding streams and Reduce sediment and • Reconstruct stream channels
Water Quality: ephemeral gullies and eroding upland nutrient input from slated for restoration with stable
Sediment areas. Stream and gullies will be adjacent agricultural.
stabilized and 2 BMPs will treat runoff Implement BMPs to dimensions and appropriate
from upland sources. reduce sediment loads depth relative to the existing
floodplain.Add bank revetments
to stream. and instream structures to
Protect and improve protect restored/enhanced
High-Project is expected reduce TN by headwater tributaries; streams.
1026 lbs/yr and TP by 85 lbs/yr based on Reduce sediment and • Restore riparian stream corridor
20 acres of new livestock exclusion. nutrient input from
Water Quality: Runoff from heavily fertilized pastures adjacent agricultural and pocket wetland areas to slow
Nutrients and filter runoff from adjacent
will be filtered through restored and fields; implement agricultural fields.
supplemented buffers. BMPs will treat stormwater BMPs to • Install/improve fencing as needed
runoff from adjacent agricultural areas. reduce nutrient loads
to exclude livestock from streams
to streams.
High-Exclusion of livestock and land and riparian areas,and/or
conversion will reduce fecal coliform Exclude livestock from exclude livestock from adjacent
loading by approximately 1.60x1012 streams. fields.
Improve treatment • Install BMPs upstream of
Water Quality: col/yr.These pollutants will be further processes by restoring headwater tributaries to reduce
Fecal Coliform reduced by eliminating fertilized hay floodplain wetlands nutrient,sediment,and fecal
pasture, planting vegetated buffers on and implementing inputs from adjacent agriculture
the site,and implementing BMPs to treat
agricultural runoff from adjacent BMPs to treat adjacent
agriculture. agricultural runoff.
Very High-Proposed project will include • Reconnect incised streams to
implementation of two BMPs to capture Reconnect streams to their floodplains through
flood plains;
runoff form historic terraces and contour restoration will restore floodplain
Hydrology: plowing. Incised channels will be implement BMPs to wetlands and address peak flows.
Peak Flows restored using Priority 1 restoration to infiltrate runoff and • Install BMPs upstream of
attenuate peak flows
allow for increased floodplain storage of from contour headwater tributaries to reduce
stormflows and decreasing the drainage peak hydrology from historically
effect on surrounding wetland pockets. plowing/terracing. terraced watersheds.
Moderate—An existing farm pond along
UT1 will be removed and channel
profiles along UT6 and will be
Hydrology: constructed too allow aquatic organism Improve instream and • Remove one existing farm pond.
Artificial Barriers passage upstream of Dillon Road. wetland habitats • Eliminate existing active headcuts
Headcuts will be stabilized and/or in tributaries.
removed along UT4, UT4a,UT3, UT2,
and UT6A.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.2

Site Functional Functional Uplift Potential Site Goal Site Objective
Stressors
Moderate-Wetland pockets have been Remove hydrologic
drained due to downcutting of streams, bypass areas.Allow for
drainage swales,and installation of drain frequent flooding and • Fill agricultural ditches and
Hydrology: tiles. Priority 1 stream restoration will improve wetland remove tile drains to rehydrate
hydrology for the relic wetland areas
Ditching/Draining raise the streambeds to allow for reestablishment, • Raise stream beds through
frequent overbank flooding and drainage rehabilitation,and Priority 1 restoration.
features including drainage swales and
tiles will be removed. enhancement of
floodplain wetlands.
High-A portion of Site streams are
actively incising and have numerous • Install habitat features on
Habitat: headcuts which present an impassible restored reaches and remove
Diversify and connect
Habitat barrier to most aquatic organisms. existing aquatic barriers including
instream habitat.
Fragmentation Restoring the streams through these active headcuts and an existing
areas will improve aquatic organism farm pond.
passage on site.
High-Site streams have limited bedform
diversity influenced by fine sediments
Habitat: from active bank and gully erosion and
Limited Bedform • Install habitat features such as
Diversity inappropriate channel dimensions which constructed steps,cover logs,and
have limited stream capacity and
overwhelmed natural bedform features. brush toes on restored reaches.
Improve instream Add woody materials/LWD to
Low—Large woody debris is present
along portions of Bridgefork Creek based habitat channel beds.Construct pools of
Habitat: on falling overstory vegetation along varying depth. Remove farm
Absence of Large failing banks. Project tributaries have pond and re-establish forested
Woody Debris varying levels of overstory vegetation riparian wetland habitat.
currently established which provide
some large woody debris.
Permanently protect • Establish a conservation
N/A N/A the project site from easement on the Site, including
harmful uses. headwater streams.
Sources:
NC Division of Mitigation Services.2009. Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/basin-planning/maps.
2.0 Project Description
The following section describes the existing conditions at the Site in terms of geomorphic condition,
watershed, soils, geology, cultural resources, species of concern, regulated floodplain zones, and site
constraints. Figure 2 provides a Site map that shows approximate locations of incision, water quality
stressors, active headcuts, bedrock, and other relevant site observations.
2.1 Existing Site Conditions
Current land use at the Site is a mix of agriculture including active cattle, active horse pasture, and hay
pasture depending on the property owner(Figure 2).Across the project Site, approximately 35 to 45
head of cattle and 5 to 10 horse are currently managed. Majority of the property has been in cattle or
hay pasture since as far back as 1938. In addition to cattle grazing, a portion of the project property was
an active dairy farm prior to 1963 and historic infrastructure can still be seen within existing cattle
pastures. Property between UT4 and UT4a been abandoned for the last 20 years.The upland areas of
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.3

the property were timbered sometime between 2015 and 2017, but vegetated buffers were left along
project tributaries based of forestry best management practices and regulations.
Between March 9 and March 11, 2020; all Site streams were evaluated and scored Bridgefork Creek,
UT1, UT3, UT4, UT5, and UT6 were identified as perennial for their entirety within the project limits.
Headwater tributaries UT4A and UT6A begin as ephemeral channels within the project limits, score as
intermittent for a portion of project length, and eventually become perennial streams as drainage
increases. UT2 was identified as an intermittent stream within the project limits. Stream forms are
included in the appendix. Details about the existing streams and associated reaches are provided in
Section 2.2 below.
All reaches of Bridgefork Creek lack adequate riparian buffer in the right floodplain. Unnamed
tributaries, including UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT4A, UT5, UT6, and UT6A have some portion of established
hardwood forests in the immediate floodplains. In the forested areas of the Site,typical overstory
species include a mix of tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera),American beech (Fagus grandifolia), green
ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), white oak(Quercus alba), red oak(Quercus rubra),water oak(Quercus
nigra), sweet gum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), river birch (Betula nigra), eastern red cedar(Juniperus
virginiana), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and persimmon (Diospyros virginiana). The understory,
scrub/shrub, and groundcover within forested areas typically include species such as Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),American holly(Ilex opaca), elderberry(Sambucus
sp.),Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides),wild ginger
(Hexastylis shuttleworthii), periwinkle (Vinca minor), and river cane (Arundinaria gigantea). Vegetation
in areas managed in livestock and pasture is dominated by common pasture grasses such as tall fescue
(Festuca arundinacea)with soft rushes(Juncus effuses) in wet, low lying areas.
A review of historic aerials from 1938 to 2016 shows the Site streams have existed in their approximate
locations over time.The Site appears to have been contour plowed and terraced prior to 1938 and
terracing can still be observed on Site currently. On the Dellinger and Judd properties, Bridgefork Creek
appears to have been straightened sometime before 1938 and both floodplains of the stream were
cleared with only minor vegetation left along the immediate bank. UT4 Reach 1 and 2, and UT4A appear
to have also been cleared up to top of bank sometime during or prior to the 1938 aerial photograph.The
left floodplain of Bridgefork Creek and UT4 appear to have been allowed to revegetate sometime
between 1964 and 1976. Evidence of dairy farm operations, including a sludge pond and drainage can
be seen as far back as 1961, but appear to halt by 1976, which was in agreement with timelines
provided by the property owners.Timbering practices between UT4 and UT4a can be observed in the
2016 aerial photograph.The farm pond proposed for removal along UT1 can be seen as far back as
1961.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.4

2.2 Existing Conditions-Streams
Bridgefork Creek Low Banks and Bedrock Along Bridgefork
Bridgefork Creek Reach la flows onto the Site from a Creek Reach la
culvert under Patterson Road.The reach flows through a
moderately sloped unconfined valley with some mature
vegetation.This reach of Bridgefork Creek is characterized 4tr r,:'
by low banks, low sinuosity, and extensive bedrock
influence which has prevented downcutting. Livestock
access along with invasive vegetation in the immediate left • ';' �
ti
floodplain are the major stressors for this portion of the ti �ry ` -.c
project.After the stream flows under an overhead utility, F ,
the bedform and condition along Bridgefork Creek
deteriorates. �`'
The floodplain widens and the slope flattens as Bridgefork Creek Reach lb incises. Low bank heights
increase as bank height ratios (BHR) along Bridgefork Creek approach 2.0.The banks and floodplain lack
native vegetation; active erosion and mass wasting are evident. Additionally, cattle impacts become
more prevalent as cattle runs and wallow areas appear with
higher frequency.The pattern is characterized by tortuous Active Erosion and Mass Wasting Along
meanders, which are actively migrating downstream Bridgefork Creek Reach 1B
indicating lateral instability. A trampled relic riparian „
wetland in the right floodplain exhibits historic ditching to ti
drain hydrology from the upland pastures. Bedform along n Tom;
the reach is primarily long sandy runs, with little to no
coveredpool habitat.The left and right floodplain are fescue
g p '°-
grasses at the upstream extent of the reach, but as the " ,¢N- `
stream flows southwest towards the left valley wall, it �.
enters a section of hardwood species, many of which are
failing or at risk of failing based on active bank erosion along
the stream. UT1 and UT2 enter from the left floodplain as
the valley narrows and the stream flows west.The stream
begins to overwiden but is halted in many areas by an Debris Jams and Over Widening Along
Bridgefork Creek Reach 1B
increase in lateral stability provided by woody bank , ! #,,. �
vegetation. However,the increase in drainage results in eat ; + ' f ,
further downcutting and incision.Additionally, many of the j + - i; E.
IL4 iv
large woody species have failed and fallen into the stream (°
creating debris jams which have caused multiple locations of
active bank erosion along the reach. No bedrock influence -� _
was observed along Bridgefork Creek Reach lb.
y f.
Shortly after the confluence with UT3,the pattern along *
Bridgefork Creek shifts to a more stable stream sinuosity `m -.-
given the stream and valley type. Reduction in meander
radius, an increase in bedrock influence, and a decrease in incision characterize the change to Bridgefork
Creek Reach 2.Water quality impacts from cattle access and areas of narrow riparian buffer are
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.5

prevalent throughout this reach.The bedform is extensively influenced by sand, but bedrock slides,
riffles, short sandy runs, step pools, and meander pool habitat are present in some locations along the
reach. At some locations along Bridgefork Creek Reach
2, bankfull benches have begun to form. Active Bank Erosion Along Bridgefork Creek
Reach 3
Bridgefork Creek Reach 3 returns to a condition like
Bridgefork Creek Reach la where pattern is s x
characterized by tortuous meanders and lateral
instability. Grade control in the form of bedrock is no
longer present and as a result, the stream has downcut.
Downcutting has disconnected the reach from the _ � -
adjacent floodplain and when combined with high A� „
sinuosity, has created an unstable stream condition.At
the very downstream end of the reach,the riparian ,
corridor becomes dominated by invasive vegetation anr`
which reduces the presence of native riparian
understory along the reach.
UT1 and UT2
UT1's location has been manipulated and impacted for Aerial Photo of the Gully at Upstream end UT1
infrastructure and farming practices. At the upstream
end of the reach,the stream has been rerouted to
parallel US-74 and at least two stormwater outlets
discharge into the stream upstream of the existing farm
pond. Based on aerial photography, a large gully has r
formed as a result of the stormwater outfalls sometime
between 2015 and 2017.A portion of the original stream . .
flow is routed into the farm pond, while the gully has cut -
around the existing farm pond and joins the reach
downstream of pond. Downstream of the pond,the
reach is incised, actively eroding, and disconnected from
its current floodplain.
Similarly, UT2 has been impacted by upstream Stormwater Outfall and Active Headcut at
infrastructure. US-74 as well as an existing underground Upstream End of UT2
utility are immediately upstream of the reach which 'VOW'
enters the Site from an existing stormwater outfall.The _
stream has headcut within 50-feet of the existing: _
stormwater outfall and as a result, has become deeply _`�
incised and disconnected from the adjacent floodplain. -
The incised condition and bank erosion have introduced t
large amounts of bank sediment into the downstream
portion of reach, negatively impacting the existing
bedform. Sediments from the active headcut and eroding -14171.
banks are also being discharged into Bridgefork Creek , r
where the stream ties to the mainstem. '
UT3 and UT5
UT3 flows through a wooded confined valley with a moderate slope. Sediment transport seems out of
balance along the reach. High sediment loads are being deposited towards the downstream end, causing
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.6

minor braiding and loss of dimension.The increased sediment load is likely from infrastructure and/or
bank erosion upstream. Overall,the short reach is in moderate condition, with one active headcut that
needs to be stabilized, some invasive understory vegetation, low banks, and marginal quality bedform.
Similarly, UT5 enters the Site from a small confined valley before reaching the broad flat floodplain of
Bridgefork Creek.The short reach flows through an established hardwood forest, but the understory is
dominated by Chinese privet.The stream has low banks, no active heads, and generally appears to be in
a stable and functioning condition. Based on the location of the reach,there is no current livestock
access to UTS.
UT4 and UT4A
UT4 flows through a moderately confined, moderately sloped valley.At the upstream end, a series of
bedrock slides and step pools maintain grade control and provide excellent bedform and habitat.As the
stream flows southwest towards Bridgefork Creek, the sinuosity increases as the slope decreases.There
is some minor bank erosion along the reach, but generally the banks are low and stable with habitat
features and bedform including step pools, pocket pools, undercut banks, leafy debris packs, short sandy
runs, and even some coarse riffles.The major stressor to this reach is a complete infestation of Chinese
privet and Japanese honeysuckle in the understory of the riparian corridor.Additionally,the confined
valley lends itself to disposal of trash and debris,which is evident at multiple spots along the reach,
particularly in the right floodplain.
UT4A begins on Site as an ephemeral channel
that starts at a series of headcuts before Concrete Rubble Used to Attempt to Stop Headcutting
becoming intermittent and ultimately perennial at the Upstream Extent of UT4A
within the project boundary.At the upstream •
ephemeral extent, historic contour plowing and
terracing has altered the natural drainages aY
patterns and directs much of the drainage to one � F..-
location, causing headcutting and erosion as *"'A' ';,,,
surface water drains to the gully-type valley.To �'`_ •y ' �,�:
try and stabilize the headcut, concrete rubble
and debris has been placed at the upstream #
_ e
extent by the property owners.The intermittent q^P i
and perennial sections of stream flow through a3y t
series of smaller headsets, continuing to incise
and remain in an unstable and low functioning
condition.Actively eroding banks and bedform inundated by increased sediment load from upstream
erosion are consistent along much of the reach. Generally, the stream lacks floodplain connection and
any bankfull benches have eroded through active headcutting. Like UT4,years of agricultural debris and
trash have been dumped in the channel and valley.The stream is fenced from livestock along the left
upper terrace, but the riparian buffer along the left floodplain is less than 15 feet wide in most locations.
Along the right floodplain, hardwoods are effective in holding some of the existing valley walls, but the
understory is dominated by invasive species.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.7

UT6 and UT6A
UT6 flows onto the site from an adjacent Representative Photo of UT6:Over widened, incised,
in an incised and erodingcondition. and a lack of bedform diversity.
property T„ .. 5
The channel is over widened for the entirety of
the reach. While Wildlands believes that the /i
bed of the channel is naturally sand bed,the / ';-
volume of fine sediments in the existing •:•. _ 1,_
channel is overwhelming any potential for - • ._,, .,- _�
bedform diversity, especially downstream of k.
the UT6 and UT6A confluence. Incision - - Af._
(BHR>1.5) is most prevalent at the upstream Ff
end of the reach and near Dillon Road.The �o ,
floodplain vegetation is a mix of hardwood ' ` �`'' -
species and invasive understory.The stream --/, e_"' T"--, - -'-` .. .- -
flows through an unconfined, alluvial valley
with a low slope. Livestock do not currently have access to the stream but water quality and habitat
stressors including sediment and lack of bedform diversity are prevalent along the entirety of the reach.
UT6A begins on Site as an ephemeral channel before becoming intermittent and ultimately perennial
within the project boundary.The valley along UT6A is like the valleys along UT4 and UT4A: a moderately
confined gully type valley with moderate slope.As with UT4 and UT4A, UT6A had multiple instances of
trash and farm debris at the upstream extent. Based on topographic mapping and Site observations,
UT6A used to flow through an adjacent valley and at some time historically, cut a new valley south of its
previous location and re-entered the relic valley approximately halfway down the reach. Currently the
reach has down cut again, abandoning the relic valley completely and creating a new valley alignment.
Wildlands believes these valley cuts are one of the major sources of fine sediment that were observed in
the downstream reaches of UT6. In its current location, UT6A is actively eroding and incised and littered
with farm debris and rubble. Like UT6,the floodplain vegetation is a mix of hardwood species and
invasive understory.
LIDAR Rendered Topographic Imagery of UT6A showing Existing and Relic Gully Type Valleys
iii IF it . -...:- ,_ ,
r T
►,': �. ilTi��. Relic Valley of
� 1� 'r _ 4 illif
UT6A which is •
i
�. _ Currently
4 ;. r A . Abandoned
r -'P,,.• ,fielicifitimairsp.
•
f 1"e f. - '� Current UT6A ..
_ Stream and Valley }
Alignment '
- -�,� c ;•s , t Previous Entry
#:y try
' .:7. -r k,, •y ,1• qy; ,,t,v F Point into Relic
" '' qi: r' . a*-" 10,,, '",,. '' :" •' Valley along UT6A
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.8

2.3 Existing Conditions—Wetlands Existing Pocket Wetland at Bridgefork Dairy
The Site includes approximately 0.1 acres of existing Mitigation Site
pocket wetland which are currently maintained for
livestock grazing. Vegetation in the small wetland in the ' ' _ R
right floodplain of Bridgefork Creek Reach lb is -
maintained pasture grasses. Vegetation in the small Y:_ .;
wetland in the left floodplain of Bridgefork Creek Reach
lb is comprised of larger hardwood species, but no
understory or herbaceous wetland species. Hydrology in
existing wetlands is impaired due to infrequent � ; • �"
overbank events, drainage influence of channelized and ' e • �
a A'�. +C
incised streams, shallow ditching, and tiles drains in the K
right floodplain of Bridgefork Creek Reach 2 (Figure 2).
Wildlands believes that there are likely other small pocket areas of wetland throughout the project area,
but at the proposal stage, areas under 0.05 acres were not included within the Site mapping and
evaluation.
An additional 2.0 acres of the Site contains hydric soils or relic hydric soils,which do not appear to have
a current wetland hydrologic regime or the required wetland vegetation for current jurisdictional
delineation. It must be noted that a jurisdictional delineation was not performed, but decisions were
based on Wildlands staff's previous experience and best judgement, along with information and
discussion provided by a licensed soil scientist (LSS).Wetland hydrology in these areas has been altered
by shallow ditching,tile drains to the channelized streams, and hydrology drawdown from stream
incision.The LSS assessed potential wetland areas and evaluated the presence and existence of hydric
soils and potential for reestablishment through construction of appropriately sized stream channels and
removal/filling of current site ditching and drainage features. Results from the LSS assessment including
a brief report, map showing soils boring locations, and typical soil boring profiles are included in the
Appendix.
2.4 Existing Conditions—Watersheds
The Site topography, as indicated on the Waco, NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, shows
moderately sloped and broad valleys typical of the Piedmont along Bridgefork Creek(Figure 3). Valleys
for project tributaries are shown as steeper and more confined, which is typical of smaller drainages and
headwater tributaries in this region. Drainage areas for the project reaches were delineated using 2-foot
contour intervals derived from the 2016/2017 North Carolina Emergency Management Light Detection
and Ranging (LiDAR) data (Figure 6). Land uses draining to the project reaches are a mix of forested and
agricultural pasture/hay fields, and development.The land use was calculated using the National Land
Cover Database (NLCD)for 2016.The watershed areas and current land uses are summarized in Table
G.2, below and depicted in Figure 4.
Table G.2 Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
NC DWR Stream
Reach Intermittent/ Watershed Watershed
Identification Land Usel
Name Perennial Status Area (acres) Area(sq.mi.)
Form Scores
Bridgefork 49.5 Perennial 1300 2.03 43%agricultural,39%forested,
Creek 18%developed,<1%open water
UT1 35 Perennial 17 0.03 19%agricultural,60%forested,
21%developed,<1%open water
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.9

NC DWR Stream
Reach Intermittent/ Watershed Watershed
Name Identification Land Use'
Perennial Status Area (acres) Area(sq.mi.)
Form Scores
UT2 26.5 Intermittent 16 0.03 65%agricultural,8%forested, 27%
developed,<1%open water
UT3 36 Perennial 12 0.02 22%agricultural,47%forested,
31%developed,<1%open water
UT4 37.5 Perennial 113 0.18
69%agricultural,22%forested,9%
27 Intermittent developed,<1%open water
UT4A 95 0.15
38.5 Perennial
UT5 32 Perennial 15 0.02 44%agricultural,32%forested,
24%developed,<1%open water
UT6 40 Perennial 300 0.47
25.5 Intermittent 52%agricultural,35%forested,
UT6A 16 0.03 13%developed,<1%open water
33 Perennial
'Land use based on 2016 National Land Cover Database(NLCD 2016)provided by USGS
2.5 Soils
The proposed project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Cleveland County.The primary project area
soils are described below in Table G.3. Figure 5 provides a soil map of the Site.While Wehadkee soils
were not mapped via Web Soil Survey, investigations by a LSS identified floodplain soils as most like
Wehadkee.Therefore,this soil type and description are included the Table G.3. Upland soils surrounding
the site are primarily sandy loams,which is consistent with the high sand volumes Wildlands observed
within the existing bedform of site streams.
Table G.3 Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Description
Chewacla loam is typically found on floodplains or at toe of slopes.Typical
Chewacla Loam slopes are between 0 and 2 percent.The soil unit is frequently flooded and
are somewhat poorly drained.
Grover gravelly sandy loam is typically found on hillslopes and ridges with
Grover Gravelly Sandy Loam slopes between 15 and 30 percent.The soil unit is typically rocky and well
drained.
Madison-Bethlehem complex is typically found on hillslopes and ridges with
Madison-Bethlehem Complex slopes ranging from 8 to 15 percent.The soil unit is typically stony,
moderately eroded,and well drained.
Hulett Gravelly Sandy Loam Hulett gravelly sandy loam is typically found on interfluves with slopes
between 2 and 8 percent.The soil unit is considered stony and well drained.
Wehadkee soils are typically found on floodplains with slopes ranging from 0
Wehadkee to 2 percent.The soil unit is frequently flooded and are typically poorly or
very poorly drained.
Source:Soil Survey of Cleveland County,North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.10

2.6 Geology
According to the North Carolina Geologic Survey(NCGS), the Site is located in the Cat Square terrane of
the Piedmont physiographic province.The Piedmont is characterized by gently rolling, well-rounded hills
with long low ridges, with elevations ranging from 300 to 1500 feet above sea level.The Cat Square
terrane is composed of metamorphic rocks that have been intruded by younger granitic rocks.
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985),the underlying geology of the proposed
restoration site is mapped as Late Proterozoic-Cambrian (500 to 900 million years in age) mica schist
(CZms) and Cherryville Granite (Mc).These Mc unit is massive to weakly foliated, and contains
pegmatites, lithium-bearing on east side.The CZms unit includes garnet, staurolite, kyanite, or
sillimanite occur locally; lenses and layers of quartz schist, micaceous quartzite, calc-silicate rock, biotite
gneiss, amphibolite, and phyllite. Shallow bedrock outcroppings were observed and mapped in Site
streams and floodplains (Figure 2). Shallow bedrock was observed in reaches proposed for an
Enhancement II approach and has limited stream downcutting in these reaches.
Sources:Geologic Map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale.
Compiled by Philip M.Brown at el.Raleigh,NC,North Carolina Geological Survey
h ttps://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.h tml?appid=a8281cbd24b84239b29cd2ca798d4a10
The Terranes and Major Geologic Elements Of North Carolina.
h ttps://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.h tml?appid=0a7ccd9394734ff6aa2434d2528ddf12
2.7 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are several entries in the State Historic Preservation Office's National Register in the vicinity of the
Site, but none located on Site parcels or that are expected to be impacted by Site activities.The closest
National Register sites include Davidson Elementary School (site ID CL1498), and the West End Historic
District (CL0955).The archaeological site files at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA)
have not been reviewed at this time. All appropriate cultural resource agencies will be contacted for
their review and comment prior to any land disturbing activity.
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Managed Areas and Significant Natural Areas references
Crowders Mountain State Park and Dedicated Nature Preserve, about five miles from the Site.There are
six NC Historic Preservation Areas within five miles of the Site (Figure 1).
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands searched the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NHP databases for federally protected
plant and animal species in Cleveland County, NC. Currently the northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) and the dwarf-flowered heartleaf(Hexastylis naniflora) plant are federally listed as
threatened.The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is also protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Art.A pedestrian survey conducted on March 9, 2020, indicated possible summer roasting
habitat for the northern long-eared bat.Areas of potential suitable habitat for the dwarf-flowered
heartleaf were also observed where the common wild ginger(Hexastylis shuttleworthii)was observed.
No individuals were seen of either northern long-eared bat or the dwarf-flowered heartleaf. No suitable
habitat is present onsite for the bald eagle. Wildlands will conduct a full review of the Site for protected
species upon award of contract and will coordinate with USFWS and NCWRC as necessary based on that
review.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.11

Table G.4 Federally Protected Species in Cleveland County,NC
Species Federal Status Habitat
Vertebrate
Northern long-eared bat Roost in 3"dbh dead and alive trees with exfoliating bark,
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Threatened crevices or hollows during summer months. Caves or mines
during winter months.
Bald eagle(Haliaeetus Bald and Golden Eagle Habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers,and
leucocephalus) Protection Act some seacoasts. In winter,the birds congregate near open water
in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.
Vascular Plant
Dwarf-flowered Acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy areas next
heartleaf(Hexastylis Threatened to streams and creek heads,and along the slopes of nearby
naniflora) hillsides and ravines.
Habitat information from the following websites:
https://www.fws.goviraleigh/species/cntylist/Cleveland.html
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-by-cu rrent-range-county?fips=37045
2.9 Floodplain Compliance
The Site is represented on the Cleveland County Flood Map 3710258500J. None of the project streams
are mapped with FEMA-regulated floodplains. Wildlands does not anticipate that coordination with the
Cleveland County floodplain administrator or the need to obtain a floodplain development permit for
the project will be required.
2.10 Site Constraints and Access
Seven internal easement breaks and one external easement break are proposed at the Site to maintain
landowner access, allow for overhead and underground utility crossings, maintain use of adjoining
tracts, and maintain existing public transportation rights-of-way. Ford and culvert crossings are
proposed to be fenced and gated if needed for livestock exclusion. Culverts will be designed with the
restored stream bed profile to allow for aquatic organism passage.The crossings are summarized and
numbered below in Table G.6 and depicted on Figures 6.
Table G.6 Proposed Easement Crossings
No. Width (ft) Location Internal or External Crossing Type
1 100 Bridgefork Creek Reach lb Internal Overhead Utility
2 100 Bridgefork Creek Reach 2 Internal Overhead Utility
Proposed Gated Ford Crossing
3 25 UT1 Internal Overhead Utility
4 50 Bridgefork Creek Reach lb Internal Proposed Culvert Crossing
5 25 UT1 Internal Underground Utility
(King's Mountain Water Easement)
6 40 UT4 Internal Proposed Culvert Crossing
7 40 Bridgefork Creek Reach 3 Internal Proposed Gated Ford Crossing
8 60 UT6 External Existing Dillon Road Culvert
Crossing
The easement boundaries around streams proposed for mitigation credit provide the required 50-foot
minimum riparian buffer for Piedmont streams. Wildlands notes that the upstream end of UT3 does not
meet the required 50-foot buffer.This area will be put under conservation easement to protect the
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.12

stream buffer in perpetuity as shown in Figure 6, but no stream mitigation credit will be proposed in this
upstream area.
The entire easement area can be accessed for construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship
from Patterson Road and/or Dillon Rd.As represented in Figure 1,there are no airports within five miles
of the Site.
3.0 Project Development—Functional Uplift Potential
The Wildlands Team proposes to restore a high quality of ecological function to streams,wetlands, and
riparian corridors on this Site.The project design will be developed to avoid significant adverse impacts
to existing streams,wetland resources, or mature wooded vegetation where possible. Management
strategies for individual resources are tailored to their functional uplift potential.
3.1 Functional Uplift for Water Quality
Riparian Vegetation
The right floodplain of Bridgefork Creek lacks established riparian vegetation beyond pasture grasses
and some hardwood overstory species. UT1, UT2, and UT3 have riparian buffers primarily consisting of
overstory species primarily, with limited herbaceous or scrub/shrub layers. UT4, UT4A, UTS, UT6, and
UT6A have riparian buffers consisting of primarily overstory species, with extensive understories of
invasive species which will require treatment.Vegetation within wetland areas proposed for restoration
is currently pasture grasses and hardwood overstory species. Using the estimate of livestock exclusion
areas removing 51.04 lbs of total nitrogen (TN) per acre per year(DMS 2016), and 4.23 lbs of total
phosphorus (TP) per acre per year,this project may reduce TN by 1026 lbs and TP by 85.0 lbs annually
(based on 20 acres of new livestock exclusion). Wildlands has scored non-functioning riparian
buffer/wetland vegetation functional uplift as high.
Sediment
The Bridgefork Creek watershed is composed of 43%agricultural land use, 39%forested land use, and
18% developed land use. Based on a brief review of the Bridgefork Creek watershed, the majority of the
agricultural land use is historically terraced fields adjacent to or directly upstream of Bridgefork Creek,
UT4, UT4A, UT6, and UT6A. While the project cannot control upstream sediment sources, the installation
of two BMPs to treat runoff from agricultural pastures will reduce fine sediment loads to headwater
streams and ultimately into the project receiving waters. Gully stabilization and restoration along UT6A,
UT4, and UT4A will also reduce sediment inputs into the system.Additionally, mass wasting of bank
material from erosion and livestock access onsite contribute sediment to the system. Channels onsite are
currently overwhelmed with fine sediments and lack sediment capacity and floodplain connection to
appropriately process sediments induced from the cattle trampling and onsite bank erosion and mass
wasting. Following restoration of channel banks,the exclusion of livestock from the channels,the
installation of best management practices, and the stabilization of eroding gullies, sediment supply will be
reduced background levels more appropriate with channel constructed channel capacities. Wildlands has
scored sediment functional uplift potential as high.
Sources:
NCDMS.2016.Quantifying Benefits to Water Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for Stream
Restoration.
NOAA Atlas 14,Volume 2,Version 3
Schwab et al.1993.Soil and Water Conservation Engineering.NY, NY.John Wiley&Sons,Inc.
Nutrients and Fecal Coliform
Livestock and active pasture account for approximately 50%of the project site. Converting that
pastureland to forest may reduce the total nitrogen (TN) contributed by the site by 1026 pounds per
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.13

year and total phosphorus (TP) by 85 pounds per year(Table G.5). Exclusion of livestock and land
conversion may also reduce fecal coliform loading on site by approximately 1.60x1012 colonies annually.
Calculation variables are shown in Table G.6 below. Wildlands has scored nutrients functional uplift
potential as high and fecal coliform uplift potential as high.
Table G.5 Water Quality Calculations
Estimated Nutrient and Fecal Coliform Reductions for Proposed Project
Input Variables
Acres of livestock exclusion 20.1
LB TN reduction/ac/year 51.04
LB TP reduction/ac/year 4.23
Animal Units(AU) = 1,000lb livestock 35
colonies/AU/day 2.2E+11
%input into streams 0.085
Q-Runoff(in) 1.05
P-Accumulated rainfall 2 year-24 hr(in) ** 3.65
S-Potential Maximum retention 4.49
CN -Curve Number** 69
la-Initial Abstraction 0.9
hydrologic soil group B
pasture grazed for half of year(col/gal) 1894000
runoff volume(gal) 5.70E+05
Nutrient reduction calculations
Total Nitrogen reduction (lb/year) 1026
Total Phosphorus reduction (lb/year) 85
Fecal Coliform Direct Input(col) 6.545E+11
Fecal Coliform Reduction from buffer filtration (col) 9.46E+11
Total Fecal Coliform reduction (col) 1.60E+12
* Precipitation using NOAA Atlas 14,Volume 2,Version 3 (accessed 3/19/2020),
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov
** Curve number assumes a fair condition and B soils for pasture
3.2 Functional Uplift for Hydrology
Currently, streams on Site vary from severely incised to moderately incised.Those streams that are
moderately to severely incised (Bridgefork Creek Reaches lb and 3, UT1, UT2, UT4A, UT6, and UT6A) are
disconnected from their floodplains. Hydric soils in these areas indicate riparian wetland drainage as a
result. Confining peak flows within the channel has led to scour, incision, mass wasting of bank material,
and historic culvert failures. Restoration activities will be tailored to restore this hydrologic connection
between stream,floodplain, and riparian wetlands on incised reaches. Streams proposed for restoration
will be restored using Priority 1 restoration. Raising the stream beds will improve floodplain
connectivity, reducing the erosive effects of peak flows and decreasing the drainage effect on
surrounding wetlands.The existing channelized streams will be filled,though some vernal pools will be
established along the intersection of existing channel and areas of concentrated overland flow. Vernal
pools provide storage of runoff, as well as habitat variety. Additionally, headwater streams which have
gully erosion as a result of historic terracing and contour plowing will benefit from extended rainfall-
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.14

runoff hydrographs based on the installation of BMPs at the upstream extents. These extended rainfall-
runoff curves should reduce peak flows experienced by UT4A and UT6A as well as receiving waters
including UT4, UT6 and Bridgefork Creek. Wildlands has scored control of peak flows functional uplift
potential as very high.
A Priority 1 approach will be designed by matching the culvert with stream grade at the upstream end of
UT2. Channel profiles along UT6 will be reconstructed to allow aquatic organism passage upstream
through the existing culvert at Dillon Road. Additionally, an existing farm pond will be removed along
UT1 and multiple headcuts within tributaries UT4, UT4a, UT3, UT2, and UT6A will be removed as part of
the project.These features currently act as hydrologic and habitat barriers.The pond dam is the most
significant hydrologic barrier, as it has effects on flow regimes downstream.Wildlands has scored the
artificial barrier and other categories(pond removal)functional uplift potential as moderate.
An LSS determined that the areas proposed for wetland
crediting have existing hydric soil as noted in the report, soil
boring log, and associated figure in the Appendix.The
approximately 2 acres proposed for reestablishment is not
currently jurisdictional wetland due to a lack of wetland .'3
vegetation and hydrology.Wetland hydrology has been
g Y gY Y gY Yam. k4(44
disrupted by a combination of channel incision, ditching, and Wit' '.. ` ,
use of tile drains. K '.� .
Wildlands proposes to reestablish wetland hydrology by Restored wetland
implementing Priority 1 stream restoration, plugging and
filling ditches, creating surface roughness, and removing
existing tile drains. Wildlands anticipates very minor or no grading will be necessary to uncover buried
hydric soils in the reestablishment zones.These activities will work to improve hydrologic functioning of
proposed reestablishment areas. While rehabilitation areas generally have functioning hydrology,they
have been hydrologically disconnected from on-Site streams. Restoring the rehabilitation areas will
hydrologically reconnect all on site wetlands to the streams.Wildlands has scored ditching and draining
functional uplift potential as Moderate.
3.3 Functional Uplift for Habitat
A portion of Site streams are actively incising and have numerous headcuts which present an impassible
barrier to most aquatic organisms. Restoring the streams through these areas will improve aquatic
organism passage on site. Wildlands has scored habitat fragmentation functional uplift potential as
high.
A large portion of Site streams have limited bedform diversity influenced by fine sediments from active
bank erosion and inappropriate channel dimensions which have limited stream capacity and
overwhelmed natural bedform features.
A diverse bedform will be created in streams slated for restoration to provide habitat for species of
insects, fish, and amphibians. Woody instream structures appropriate for the geomorphic setting, such
as log weirs, woody riffles, log vanes, and brush toes will be implemented. Planting the riparian buffers
with woody vegetation will provide future sources of large woody debris for the streams. Wildlands has
scored limited bedform diversity functional uplift potential as high and absence of large woody debris
as low.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.15

Table G.6 Functional Uplift Potential Summary Table
Functional Functional Stressor Functional Uplift TRA
Category Potential
Non-functioning riparian buffer/wetland vegetation High X
Water Quality Sediment High X
Nutrients High X
Fecal Coliform High X
Peak flows Very High X
Hydrology Artificial Barriers Moderate _ X
Ditching/Draining Moderate X
Habitat Fragmentation High X
Habitat Limited Bedform Diversity High X
Absence of Large Woody Debris Low X
4.0 Project Development—Design Approach
Wildlands will begin the project by identifying the best design approach to meet the stated project
objectives and implement the appropriate degree of intervention.A combination of analog, empirical,
and analytical design approaches will potentially be used. All project resources will be designed to create
stable,functional stream channels and riparian wetlands.
4.1 Enhancement II
Reaches slated for an Enhancement II approach include Bridgefork Creek Reaches la and 2, UT3, and
UT4.These reaches are geomorphically stable in their current condition and generally have minor active
bank erosion, low BHRs, and low bank slopes.As shown in Figure 2,these reaches have existing bedrock
features which prevent downcutting and provide quality bedform habitat. Generally, these reaches have
some existing riparian buffer, including canopy hardwood species and some scrub/shrub vegetation
within the understory. Reaches along Bridgefork Creek proposed for an Enhancement II approach have
historic and/or ongoing livestock access to the streams and buffers, which has threatened water quality,
bank stability, and buffer integrity. Cattle exclusion, widening of the existing riparian corridor through
planting, and minor bank grading and stabilization will be the primary enhancement practices along
Bridgefork Creek. Enhancement practices proposed along UT4 include treating invasive vegetation in the
riparian corridor including blackberry(Rubrus spp.), Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle.Widening
of the existing riparian corridor through planting, minor bank grading, and removal of farm and
agricultural debris within existing valleys will be the major enhancement practices along UT4.The
downstream extents of UT4 (downstream of UT4 confluence) may also need minor bedform work to
stabilize minor existing headcuts but given its location within the overall project and potential functional
uplift, Wildlands felt an Enhancement II approach was appropriate for the entirety of this reach. For
UT3, which has a relatively intact buffer,the primary enhancement practice will be livestock exclusion
and stabilization of an existing headcut along the reach to halt future degradation of the resource.
4.2 Preservation
UT5 is slated for a preservation approach. As outlined in Section 2.2 of this report, UT5 has no current
livestock access, has low banks, no active heads, and generally appears to be in a stable and functioning
condition. Placing the resource under the protection of the proposed conservation easement and
treating understory invasive species will be the primary treatment methods along this reach.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.16

4.3 Restoration
Reaches proposed for Restoration include
Bridgefork Creek Reaches lb and 3, UT1, UT2, Existing Mitigation Site Designed and Constructed
by Wild lands in Broad River Basin
UT4A, UT6, and UT6A. Restoration reaches will .
be designed and built with appropriate �� .
dimension, pattern, and profile to allow for
frequent overbank flooding, provide stable
K
bank slopes, enable biological lift, and � � �
reconnect streams with existing floodplains.
Reference streams will be identified and will ' 42:
serve as one of the primary sources of x� - z
information on which restoration designs are ,
based. Wildlands has developed a general � � ;+%^ "
approach to be used as the basis for stream ,.
restoration design.The design approach, which
is tailored to each site, continues to develop as additional projects are implemented.
Outside of transition zones, all reaches proposed for restoration will be done with a Priority 1 approach,
raising channel beds to reconnect them with existing floodplains.Transition zones are anticipated at the
upstream end of UT6, at the entrance and exit of the Dillon Road culvert crossing along UT6, and at the
downstream end of Bridgefork Creek.
One existing farm pond will be removed along UT1 as part of proposed restoration. Cattle will be
excluded from all reaches within the proposed project area. Stream structures will be installed to
promote water quality, increase bed and bank stabilization, provide bedform diversity, and increase
aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Wildlands plans to evaluate stream substrate and determine appropriate
gradations/bed features for the Site streams.At this stage, Wildlands believes most of these channels
will be built with a sand bed approach, outside of steeper minor tributaries.
Wildlands has previous experience with gully restoration, and stream stabilization and enhancement
within gullies which will be required along UT4, UT4A, and UT6A.Wildlands will use BMPs (outlined
below in Section 4.4)to transition extreme grades, mitigate altered drainage patterns, and provide fine
sediment storage for headwater tributaries at the Site.
4.4 Wetland Mitigation Approach
The wetland mitigation approach includes restoring hydrologic connection between riparian wetlands
and streams through the filling of floodplain ditches, raising of adjacent stream channels, and removal of
tile drains. In areas proposed for reestablishment, minor grading of overburden (less than 6 inches) may
also be removed from the hydric soils. Both areas of rehabilitation and reestablishment will be ripped
and disked to slow retention times and increase ponding and will be planted with appropriate wetland
vegetation. Only areas defined in the LSS report included in the Appendix as containing potential hydric
soils were included within wetland restoration zones. Wetland restoration zones are depicted in Figure
6.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.17

4.5 Proposed Best Management Practices(BMPs)
Two water quality BMPs are proposed for the Site as
BMP Constructed by Wildlands in Broad River Basin
shown on Figure 6. Both BMPs are proposed
upstream of intermittent headwater streams which ' �` ., ' ✓� ; _ � .,i`
originate within the project boundary. Previous $ '
experience workingin historicallyterraced andjut. '.;' I ° =
p ,.. *.wt Al
contour plowed drainages within the Broad River
Basin has provided Wildlands the knowledge that .'.7"
installing either Step Pool Storm Conveyances (SPSC)
and/or pocket wetland BMPs with a controlled outlet
stretches out drainage hydrographs and helps � °"'���`� { -
mitigate extreme peak flows from these watersheds � • � f x erg
Proposed BMPs also provide water quality benefits
that directly align with RBRP goals and site functional '•
stressors outlined in Table G.1. Additionally, the 5: "
proposed BMPs will provide a functional solution to
gully/tributary elevation transitions from uplands a #
down to intermittent stream channels at the Site at
the upstream end of UT4A and UT6A.
4.6 Vegetation Plan and Conservation Easement Establishment
Native riparian buffers a minimum of 50 feet from the proposed top of bank will be planted along
restored and enhanced stream reaches and in all proposed wetland restoration zones.
The Site will be planted following construction of the project.
The planting plan will be based on an appropriate nearbyz4' :_,
reference community and past project experience.The plan will 1.
be developed to restore appropriate strata (canopy, understory,
shrub, and herbaceous layers).
The canopy will be restored through planting of bare root trees. .., .
The understory and shrub layers will be restored through a -.
combination of planting bare root, low growth species and
installing live stake shrub species.The herbaceous layer will be
restored by seeding the disturbed area with a native seed mix Planted riparian buffer
with an emphasis placed on creating good soil contact to
encourage germination.
Vegetation planted in restored wetland areas will be based on species identified within appropriate
reference locations and professional experience based on site conditions.
The conservation easement areas will be marked per DMS guidelines.
5.0 Proposed Mitigation
The Site will be a combination of stream restoration, enhancement level II, and preservation totaling
10,994 stream credits. Wetland reestablishment and rehabilitation will be used to provide 2.10 wetland
credits.The mitigation credit calculation was derived using the US Army Corps of Engineers' Stream
Mitigation Guidance and was based on Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift.
Given the existing conditions of the stream channels,wetlands,the disturbance factors, and the
constraints, management objectives for each reach have been established.The management objective,
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.18

the mitigation type, and proposed amount of mitigation is presented in Table G.7 below. Stream
restoration is proposed at ratio of 1:1, enhancement level II is proposed at a ratio of 2.5:1, stream
preservation is proposed at a ratio of 5:1. Wetland reestablishment is proposed at a ratio of 1:1 and
wetland rehabilitation is proposed at a ratio of 1.5:1.
Table G.7 Mitigation Credits Proposed
Stream Credits
Type of Length Stream
Reach Management Objectives Mitigation (feet)' Ratio Credits
RESTORATION
Bridgefork Creek Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,and
Reach lb profile with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat 2,461 1:1 2,461
structures, allow bankfull floodplain access.
Bridgefork Creek Establish native riparian buffer and exclude 2,488 2.5:1 2,488
Reach 3 livestock.
'Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile
with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures,
UT1 allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native 1,087 1:1 1,087
riparian buffer and exclude livestock. Remove
existing farm pond.
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,and profile
Restoration
with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures,
UT2 270 1:1 270
allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native
riparian buffer and exclude livestock.
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile
UT6 with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures, 2,184 1:1 2,184
allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native
_ riparian buffer.
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,and profile
UT4A with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures, 909 1:1 909
allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native
UT6A riparian buffer. Establish upstream BMP. 294 1:1 294
Restoration Subtotal 9,691 9,691
ENHANCEMENT II
Bridgefork Creek
Reach la 280 2.5:1 112
Bridgefork Creek Spot bank erosion repair. Establish native riparian
Reach 2 buffer where needed and exclude livestock.Treat Enhancement II 1359 2.5:1 544
UT3 invasive vegetation. 244 2.5:1 98
UT4 1300 2.5:1 520
Enhancement II Subtotal 3,183 1,274
PRESERVATION
Protect stream resource in perpetuity with a
UT5 Preservation 145 5:1 29
conservation easement.Treat invasive vegetation.
Preservation Subtotal 145 29
TOTAL: 13,019 10,994
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.19

Wetland credits
Type of Area3 Wetland
Area Management Objectives Ratio
Mitigation (Acres) Credits
Raise adjacent stream bed, plug existing
Wetland floodplain drainage swales and tile drains where Wetland 2.030 1:1 2.030
Reestablishment applicable. Plant a forested wetland Reestablishment
community. Exclude livestock.
Exclude livestock, plug existing floodplain
Wetland Wetland
drainage swales, plant a forested wetland 0.110 1.5:1 0.073
Rehabilitation Rehabilitation
community, and treat invasive vegetation.
TOTAL: 2.140 2.103
Note 1:Length is approximate based on best professional judgement of channel size and sinuosity.
Note 2:Length excludes proposed easement crossing.
Note 3:Area is approximate based on preliminary soil investigations and best professional judgement.
6.0 Current Ownership and Long-Term Protection
The Site is located on ten parcels controlled and owned by six separate property owners. Option
agreements for the project area shown on Figure 6 have been signed by the property owners and the
Memoranda of Option are recorded at the Cleveland County Register of Deeds.The option agreements
allow Wildlands to purchase a conservation easement on the project properties.The Memoranda of
Option are valid for a minimum of 6 months from the closing date of RFP 16-20190301. Wildlands will
convey the conservation easement to the State to provide long term protection of the Site.The
conservation easement agreement will ensure the right of entry abilities of Wildlands, its contractors,
and the future easement holder in any future land transactions. Copies of the Memoranda of Option are
included in the appendix.The landowner, parcel identification number, and deed book and page
numbers for the Memorandum of Option are summarized in Table G.8.
Table G.8 Property Ownership
Property Owner Parcel ID Number Memorandum of Option Deed Book(DB)and Page(PG)Numbers
Dennis Craig Patterson 2585878557 DB: 1809 PG: 1268- 1271
Dennis Craig Patterson 2585777748 DB: 1809 PG: 1268- 1271
Hayward Bullock 2585885323 DB: 1809 PG: 1264- 1267
Bryan Keith Dellinger 2585675964 DB: 1809 PG: 1272- 1275
William Lawrence Hamrick 2586812597 DB: 1809 PG: 1336- 1339
Luke Edward Judd 2585670580 DB: 1809 PG: 1276- 1279
Luke Edward Judd 2585487530 DB: 1809 PG: 1276- 1279
Luke Edward Judd 2585584130 DB: 1809 PG: 1276- 1279
Barbara Blanton Dellinger 2585595279 DB: 1809 PG: 1280- 1283
Barbara Blanton Dellinger 2585495005 DB: 1809 PG: 1280- 1283
7.0 Scope of Work and Project Phasing
Table G.9 describes the tasks and deliverables required by the Scope of Work outlined in RFP 16-
20190301.Table G.10 provides the proposed schedule for accomplishing each Scope of Work task.The
Wildlands Team has experience handling tightly scheduled projects with multiple stakeholders. We
understand the importance of clear communication and adherence to deadlines. We will establish
additional internal deadlines to keep the project milestones on track. Each task will be staffed with the
appropriate technical and management staff to ensure quality and timely completion.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.20

Table G.10 Summary Scope of Work
Task# Task Name Task Summary DMS Deliverable
• Onsite meeting with the IRT and DMS
to discuss concepts of the mitigation
plan and obtain concurrence on
planned work and crediting. • Approved Categorical Exclusion document-
• Conduct DMS/FHWA guidelines for emailed Adobe PDF.
Environmental and environmental screening to identify • IRT meeting minutes—emailed Adobe PDF.
1 Project Screening threatened/endangered species, . DMS Full Delivery Landowner Authorization
environmental,or cultural issues on
the Site. Form (if applicable).
• Secure DMS Full Delivery Landowner
• USACE Public Notice (if applicable).
Authorization Form (if applicable).
• Satisfy USACE public notification
process(if applicable).
• 4 preliminary review items outlined in the
RFP,submitted electronically as defined in
Attachment H.
• Create conservation easement • 5 final deliverables outlined in the RFP,
2 Property documents and plats. submitted electronically and in hard copy
• Close and record the conservation as defined in Attachment H.
easement. • Installation of boundary marking
documented with As-Built survey during
Task 6.
• 2 hard copies and 1 electronic"Draft"
Mitigation Plan and survey.
Mitigation Plan • Develop a site-specific mitigation plan,
• 3 hard copies and 1 electronic"Final Draft"
(Final Draft) and appropriate for the Site.
Mitigation Plan and survey.
3 Financial •• Revise per DMS and IRT review • Performance Bond (may be retired after
completion of Task 6)
Assurance comments. • 2 Completed PCN forms and 2 hard copies of
the"Final" Mitigation Plan. 1 copy of both
submitted electronically.
• Secure all necessary permits and/or
• 1 electronic copy of approved permits prior
Permitting and to beginning earthwork.
4 Earthwork certifications for Site construction. • Written notification of earthwork
• Construct the Site. completion.
Mitigation Site
Planting and • Complete planting of Site. • Written notification of planting and
5 Installation of • Install monitoring devices. monitoring device installation completion.
Monitoring
Devices
• Conduct baseline monitoring. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of"Draft"
Baseline • Perform as-built survey. Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built
Monitoring Report • Prepare baseline monitoring drawings. Electronic copies of surveys.
6 (Including As-Built
Drawings) document. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of"Final"
Approved by DMS • Prepare as-built survey drawings. Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built
• Install easement markers and signage. drawings. Electronic copies of surveys.
• Monitor the Site.
7 Monitoring Year 1 • Prepare the monitoring report.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.21

Task# Task Name Task Summary DMS Deliverable
• Monitor the Site.
8 Monitoring Year 2 • Prepare the monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of each
9 Monitoring Year 3 • Prepare the monitoring report. "Draft" annual monitoring report. Electronic
• Monitor the Site. copy of survey.
10 Monitoring Year 4 • Prepare the monitoring report. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of each
• Monitor the Site. "Final"annual monitoring report. Electronic
11 Monitoring Year 5 • Prepare the monitoring report. copy survey.
of
• Monitor the Site.
12 Monitoring Year 6 • Prepare the monitoring report.
• 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of the
• Monitor the Site. "Draft" annual monitoring report and
Monitoring Year 7 • Prepare the monitoring report.
closeout report. Electronic copy of survey.
13 and Close-Out • Prepare closeout report. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of the
Process • Attend closeout meetings and present "Final"annual monitoring report and
final project to IRT. closeout report. Electronic copy of survey.
Table G.11 Project Schedule
Proposed Time to Proposed Completion
Project Milestone Completion Date(assuming NTP on
(from date of NTP) September 1,2020)
Task 1. Regulatory Site Visit& Environmental Screening 3 months December 1, 2020
Task 2.Submit Recorded Conservation Easement on the Site 1 year,6 months March 1,2022
Task 3. Mitigation Plan Approved by DMS and Financial 1 year,6 months March 1,2022
Assurance
Task 4. Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed 2 years, 5 months February 1,2023
Task 5. Mitigation Site Planting& Installation of Monitoring 2 years, 7 months April 1,2023
Devices
Task 6. Baseline Monitoring Report(Including As-Built 2 years,9 months June 1, 2023
Drawings)Approved by DMS
Task 7.Submit Monitoring Report#1 to DMS* 3 years, 3 months December 1, 2023
Task 8.Submit Monitoring Report#2 to DMS* 4 years, 3 months December 1, 2024
Task 9.Submit Monitoring Report#3 to DMS* 5 years, 3 months December 1, 2025
Task 10.Submit Monitoring Report#4 to DMS* 6 years, 3 months December 1, 2026
Task 11.Submit Monitoring Report#5 to DMS* 7 years, 3 months December 1, 2027
Task 12.Submit Monitoring Report#6 to DMS* 8 years, 3 months December 1, 2028
Task 13.Submit Monitoring Report#7 to DMS*and 9 years, 3 months December 1, 2029
complete Close-Out Process
*Meets success criteria(schedule progression has been developed assuming that the site meets success criteria each
monitoring year)
8.0 Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan
The performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria presented in the DMS
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance (June 2017) and the October 2016 IRT
Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to
assess the condition of the completed project. Specific performance standard components are proposed
for stream morphology, hydrology,vegetation, and wetland hydrology.The stream restoration reaches
of the project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for hydrology,vegetation, and
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.22

geomorphology.The enhancement II reaches will be assigned specific performance criteria components
for vegetation only. Wetland restoration will be assigned specific performance criteria components for
hydrology. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the (up to) seven years of post-
construction monitoring. If all stream,vegetation, and hydrologic performance criteria have been
successfully met and at least four bankfull events have occurred during separate years, Wildlands may
propose to terminate stream, wetland, and/or vegetation monitoring after five years with written
approval from the USACE and North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT).An outline of the
performance criteria components follows.
8.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, BHR, and width-to-depth ratio. Riffle cross sections should fall within the parameters
defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes will be
evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the channel
that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width-to-depth
ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth.
Remedial action would not be taken if channel changes
indicate a movement toward stability.
In order to assess channel dimension performance, µ, r ,�, �
:, 1
permanent cross sections will be installed on restoration
and reaches per the IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines r ,b� •
(October 2016). Each cross section will be permanently
marked with pins to establish its location. Cross section � r + µ` `; �
surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,
including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and
thalweg. Cross section and bank pin surveys (if applicable) Example of a cross section survey
will be conducted in monitoring years one,two, three,five,
and seven.
Profile and Pattern
Longitudinal profile surveys will be conducted during the as-built survey but will not be conducted
during the seven-year monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a
trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will
follow standards as described in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field
Technique (Harrelson et. al., 1994) for the necessary reaches.
Substrate
Based on our initial Site observations,this is a sand bed system and the nature of bed material is not
expected to change over time. Consequently, no pebble counts will be conducted for the project and no
performance standard is being set for substrate. If after project award, Wildlands determines that
channel substrate is not strictly limited to sand bed features, reach-wide and wetted pebble counts will
be evaluated and performed as deemed necessary to represent channel conditions.
8.2 Hydrology
Stream
Four bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration reaches
within the seven-year monitoring period. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the
form of four bankfull events in separate years have been documented. Bankfull events will be
documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer, as appropriate for Site
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.23

conditions.The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream within a surveyed riffle
cross section. Photographs will also be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment
deposition.
Where restoration or enhancement activities are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gages
will be installed to track the frequency and duration of stream flow events. Continuous surface water
flow within the tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days
during the seven-year monitoring period.This 30-day period of flow can occur at any point during the
year.Additional monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be documented due to
abnormally dry conditions.
Wetland
Groundwater monitoring will be conducted for seven years after construction to evaluate the hydrologic
state of the restored wetland areas. Wetland groundwater gages will be installed in accordance with the
techniques and standards described in the USACE document entitled "Technical Standard for Water-
Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites" (ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2,June 2005). Groundwater
monitoring gages will be established throughout the wetland area to adequately characterize the
different soils,vegetation communities, and surface topographic variations that are found across the
site.The final performance criteria for the wetland hydrology will be a groundwater level within 12
inches of the soil profile for a minimum period between 10%and 16%of the growing season as
determined by the appropriate NRCS WETS table for Cleveland County. Sources used to set the wetland
performance standard for the Site will include some mix of discussions with the Interagency Review
Team(IRT) and LSS,Table 1 (wetland saturation threshold values)within the Wilmington District Stream
and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update dated October 24, 2016 for Chewacla and Wehadkee soil
series (based on LSS results included in the Appendix), appropriate hydrologic modeling if deemed
necessary, and a potential unidentified reference wetland location if available.
8.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian
corridors at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven).The interim measure of vegetative
success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 native species stems per acre at the end of the
third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Also,
trees must average seven feet in height at the end of the fifth monitoring year, and ten feet in height at
the end of the seventh monitoring year. If this performance standard is met by year five and stem
density is trending towards success (i.e.,vigor), and invasive species are not threatening ecological
success, monitoring of vegetation on the Site may be terminated with written approval by the USACE in
consultation with the IRT.The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees.The number of monitoring quadrants required, and frequency of monitoring will be based on the
October 2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance.Vegetation monitoring will occur in the summer and
will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008) or another DMS approved protocol.
8.4 Other Parameters
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent mid-channel bars within the channel or vertical
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.24

incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane
arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for seven years following
construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment, so that the same
locations and view directions on the Site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor
restoration and enhancement areas, as well as vegetation plots.
Longitudinal reference photos will be established at regular intervals along the channel by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream. Cross sectional photos will be taken of each permanent cross
section looking upstream and downstream. Reference photos will also be taken for each of the
vegetation plots. Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point, cross section, and
vegetation plot will be taken when the stream and vegetation assessments are conducted.The
photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same area in each photo over time.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above.Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the
seven-year monitoring period. Problem areas such as channel instability(e.g. lateral and/or vertical
instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts),vegetation health (e.g. low
stem density,vegetation mortality, invasive species, or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock
access will be noted. Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed and will be accompanied by a
written description in the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent
visual assessment. Should remedial actions be required, a plan of action will be provided in the annual
monitoring report.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
If required by DWR as part of the project's permitting process, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will
be performed on the restored site.Any required sampling will be performed using DWR Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates(October 2012).
8.5 Reporting Performance Criteria
Using the DMS Baseline Monitoring Report Template (June 2017), a baseline monitoring document and
as-built record drawings of the project will be developed for the constructed Site.Annual monitoring
reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to DMS.These reports will
be based on the DMS Annual Monitoring Template (June 2017) and Closeout Report Template (June
2017). Full monitoring reports will be submitted to DMS in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Abbreviated monitoring reports will be submitted in monitoring years 4 and 6. Closeout monitoring
period will be seven years beyond completion of construction or until performance standards have been
met.
8.6 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
The Wildlands Team will develop necessary adaptive measures or implement appropriate remedial
actions if the site or a specific component of the site fails to achieve the success criteria outlined above.
The project-specific monitoring plan developed during the design phase will identify an appropriate
threshold for maintenance intervention based on the monitored items. Any actions implemented will be
designed to achieve the success criteria previously specified and will include a work schedule and
updated monitoring criteria (if applicable).
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.25

9.0 Quality Control
The Wildlands Team takes pride in the quality of services that we
RA F1.T
deliver to our clients. We strive to exceed our clients' expectations.To
Pb>w,wm.
maintain the highest level of quality, Wildlands has an established
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol that every °«��
member of our staff follows. �.
.a.CN,..N.-
At the beginning of a project, the necessary level of QA/QC is ▪ e, ,N
determined based on the size and complexity of the project.At a
RN o> �.
minimum,the project manager and an assigned QA/QC manager will
function to control the quality of the project.The project manager Re'"'"'
PNII.•1015W W. IICpmbnN�gpwl (uhmealtlM1 A.mmAl.
▪ Al
provides day-to-day QA/QC and may assign task leaders to provide
task-specific quality control (QC)functions.The QA/QC manager is a An.�m▪ ,,NN Con.n�wil APMu,Im Asn .
Aue
knowledgeable senior staff member who is not assigned to function in `"'"�`mm '_
a lead capacity on other areas of the project.This provides the QA/QC
manager objective views of the quality of work. Ad Err
Our QC program includes established procedures for processes
performed from project inception through implementation and
monitoring of the project. For example, Wildlands has developed
standardized checklists and pre-defined procedures for activities such
as field surveys of stream cross-sections and profiles, pebble counts, -
benthic surveys, bank stability assessments, natural channel design,
permitting, contract document preparation, post-construction baseline survey, and post construction
monitoring.The checklists are largely based on the most current DMS guidelines to ensure that all
required information is included in the correct format.Task leaders assigned for each activity train
project team members in the application of these procedures.The task leaders assist the project
manager by providing day-to-day QC functions, such as establishing clear decisions and directions to
team members in the field, checking the completeness and accuracy of checklists, constant supervision,
and documentation of all decisions, assumptions, and recommendations.The role of the project
manager in QC is to monitor and maintain project schedule and budget, address any concerns the client
may have, constantly assess company resources, and review all of the checklists.
During the conceptual and preliminary design stages,the project manager and the task leader will
perform a review of the design data, plans,technical specifications, and construction estimate for
accuracy, correct approach, and general overall quality of the product and compliance with DMS
formats before submission to the client. Sediment sampling, groundwater gage monitoring, and
pressure transducer surface flow monitoring are frequently used during the design phase to validate the
design criteria and analytical models.The project manager will perform a similar review at final design as
will the QA/QC manager. During the construction phase,the project manager and the construction task
manager will regularly meet to provide updates and discuss any issues.The goal of the QC process is to
provide the highest quality product to our client by completing tasks correctly the first time. By
completing procedural processes once,Wildlands helps ensure that we deliver the best products at a
minimum cost to our clients.
QA is performed to confirm that the QC program is effectively practiced, and to provide feedback on
further developments needed in the QC program.The QA/QC manager leads the QA program; however,
the project manager,task leaders, and project team staff also play large roles. It is each person's
responsibility to notify the QA/QC manager whenever discrepancies and inefficiencies are found in the
set of procedural activities that make up the QC process.The objective of QA is the continual
improvement of the total delivery process to enhance quality, productivity, and customer satisfaction.
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.26

We are continually improving the QC process so that our latest products and services are better than the
previous ones.
9.1 Deliverables
The project schedule is established during the scoping phases of a project and it is the project manager's
responsibility to maintain the schedule.A work plan is developed at the outset of a project and shared
internally with team members so that milestone deadlines and work requirements are clearly outlined.
Review time is built into this internal schedule to ensure that adequate review takes place.
The QA form, which is maintained by the QA/QC manager, is established at the beginning of the project
and is maintained throughout the life of the project. Reviews of technical data, design parameters,
reports, plan sheets, hydraulic models, and supporting calculations are tracked on the form. Included on
this form are requirements that a professional staff member, who is not involved in the project on a
day-to-day basis, review the design calculations, hydraulic models, reports, plans, and all other types of
project deliverables. Conformance with DMS report templates and a final grammar/spelling/formatting
review are also integrated into the QA review process.
9.2 Construction
Wildlands team members are familiar with the policies, procedures, and practices necessary to
construct natural channel design and stream and wetland mitigation projects. Wildlands has provided
construction administration and observation services of over 83 miles of stream work and 459 acres of
wetland work. We believe that project implementation is the ultimate key to a successful project and, to
achieve this, it is extremely important to have our most experienced staff members involved on all
construction projects. Our team knows how to oversee construction so that the project is completed on
time and in compliance with all federal, state, and local permits. Several members of the proposed
project team have assisted with construction services for the DMS restoration sites, many of which have
performed successfully for multiple years.
Table G.11 Wildlands Team Member Construction Oversight Experience 3 ; t'
L
G 3
cy
CV . u
L R C
Project Details LLi m m
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;9 BMPs x x
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits;4.0 wetland credits x x
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site 12,900 stream credits;8.0 wetland credits x x
Western Stream Initiative Multiple projects totaling 15,000 LF x
Reedy Creek Design Build 25,974 stream credits x x x
Stream Restoration Project
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,571 stream credits; 7.0 wetland credits x
Little Pine II Stream Restoration Project 4,156 LF of streams;5.4 acres of wetlands x x
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits;8.0 wetland credits x
Key Mill Mitigation Site 5,987 stream credits x
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site 2,746 stream credits;8.1 wetland credits x
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.27

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT B: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS
1. READ;.,-REVIEW AND COMPLY: It shall be the Vendor's responsibility to read this entire document, review all
enclosures and attachments, and any addenda thereto, and comply with all requirements specified herein,
regardless of whether appearing in these Instructions to Vendors or elsewhere in this RFP document.
2. LATE PROPOSALS: Late proposals, regardless of cause, will not be opened or considered, and will automatically
be disqualified from further consideration. It shall be the Vendor's sole responsibility to ensure the timely submission
of proposals.
3. ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION: The State reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any
informality in proposals and, unless otherwise specified by the Vendor, to accept any item in the proposal.
4. BASIS FOR REJECTION: Pursuant to 01 NCAC 05B .0501, the State reserves the right to reject any and all offers,
in whole or in part, by deeming the offer unsatisfactory as to quality or quantity, delivery, price or service offered,
non-compliance with the requirements or intent of this solicitation, lack of competitiveness, error(s) in specifications
or indications that revision would be advantageous to the State,cancellation or other changes in the intended project
or any other determination that the proposed requirement is no longer needed, limitation or lack of available funds,
circumstances that prevent determination of the best offer, or any other determination that rejection would be in the
best interest of the State.
5. EXECUTION: Failure to execute page 1 of the RFP (Execution Page) in the designated space shall render the
proposal non-responsive, and it will be rejected.
6. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE: In cases of conflict between specific provisions in this solicitation or those in any
resulting contract documents, the order of precedence shall be (high to low) (1) any special terms and conditions
specific to this RFP, including any negotiated terms; (2) requirements and specifications and administration
provisions in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this RFP; (3) North Carolina General Contract Terms and Conditions in
ATTACHMENT C: NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; (4) Instructions in
ATTACHMENT B: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS; (5)ATTACHMENT A: PRICING, and (6)Vendor's proposal.
7. INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE: Vendor shall furnish all information requested in the spaces
provided in this document. Further, if required elsewhere in this proposal, each Vendor shall submit with its proposal
any sketches, descriptive literature and/or complete specifications covering the products and Services offered.
Reference to literature submitted with a previous proposal or available elsewhere will not satisfy this provision.
Failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute sufficient cause to reject a proposal without further
consideration.
8. RECYCLING AND SOURCE REDUCTION: It is the policy of the State to encourage and promote the purchase of
products with recycled content to the extent economically practicable, and to purchase items which are reusable,
refillable, repairable, more durable and less toxic to the extent that the purchase or use is practicable and cost-
effective.We also encourage and promote using minimal packaging and the use of recycled/recyclable products in
the packaging of commodities purchased. However, no sacrifice in quality of packaging will be acceptable, The
Vendor remains responsible for providing packaging that will adequately protect the commodity and contain it for its
intended use. Vendors are strongly urged to bring to the attention of purchasers those products or packaging they
offer which have recycled content and that are recyclable.
9. CERTIFICATE TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN NORTH CAROLINA: As a condition of contract award,each out-of-
State Vendor that is a corporation, limited-liability company or limited-liability partnership shall have received, and
shall maintain throughout the term of The Contract, a Certificate of Authority to Transact Business in North Carolina
from the North Carolina Secretary of State, as required by North Carolina law. A State contract requiring only an
isolated transaction completed within a period of six months, and not in the course of a number of repeated
transactions of like nature, shall not be considered as transacting business in North Carolina and shall not require a
Certificate of Authority to Transact Business,
10. SUSTAINABILITY: To support the sustainability efforts of the State of North Carolina we solicit your cooperation
in this effort. Pursuant to Executive Order 156 (1999), it is desirable that all print responses submitted meet the
Ver:4/22/19 Page 28 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
following:
• All copies of the proposal are printed double sided.
• All submittals and copies are printed on recycled paper with a minimum post-consumer content of 30%.
• Unless absolutely necessary, all proposals and copies should minimize or eliminate use of non-recyclable or
non-reusable materials such as plastic report covers, plastic dividers, vinyl sleeves, and GBC binding. Three-
ringed binders, glued materials, paper clips, and staples are acceptable.
• Materials should be submitted in a format which allows for easy removal, filing and/or recycling of paper and
binder materials. Use of oversized paper is strongly discouraged unless necessary for clarity or legibility.
11. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES: The State is committed to retaining Vendors from diverse
backgrounds, and it invites and encourages participation in the procurement process by businesses owned by
minorities, women, disabled, disabled business enterprises and non-profit work centers for the blind and severely
disabled. In particular, the State encourages participation by Vendors certified by the State Office of Historically
Underutilized Businesses, as well as the use of HUB-certified vendors as subcontractors on State contracts.
12. RECIPROCAL PREFERENCE: G.S. 143-59 establishes a reciprocal preference requirement to discourage other
states from favoring their own resident Vendors by applying a percentage increase to the price of any proposal from
a North Carolina resident Vendor. To the extent another state does so, North Carolina applies the same percentage
increase to the proposal of a vendor resident in that state. Residency is determined by a Vendor's"Principal Place
of Business," defined as that principal place from which the overall trade or business of the Vendor is directed or
managed.
13. INELIGIBLE VENDORS: As provided in G.S. 147-86.59 and G.S. 147-86.82, the following companies are
ineligible to contract with the State of North Carolina or any political subdivision of the State: a) any company
identified as engaging in investment activities in Iran, as determined by appearing on the Final Divestment List
created by the State Treasurer pursuant to G.S. 147-86.58, and b)any company identified as engaged in a boycott
of Israel as determined by appearing on the List of restricted companies created by the State Treasurer pursuant
to G.S. 147-86.81. A contract with the State or any of its political subdivisions by any company identified in a)or b)
above shall be void ab initio.
14. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: To the extent permitted by applicable statutes and rules, the State will maintain
as confidential trade secrets in its proposal that the Vendor does not wish disclosed. As a condition to confidential
treatment, each page containing trade secret information shall be identified in boldface at the top and bottom as
"CONFIDENTIAL" by the Vendor, with specific trade secret information enclosed in boxes, marked in a distinctive
color or by similar indication. Cost information shall not be deemed confidential under any circumstances.
Regardless of what a Vendor may label as a trade secret,the determination whether it is or is not entitled to protection
will be determined in accordance with G.S. 132-1.2.Any material labeled as confidential constitutes a representation
by the Vendor that it has made a reasonable effort in good faith to determine that such material is, in fact, a trade
secret under G.S. 132-1.2.Vendors are urged and cautioned to limit the marking of information as a trade secret or
as confidential so far as is possible. If a legal action is brought to require the disclosure of any material so marked
as confidential, the State will notify Vendor of such action and allow Vendor to defend the confidential status of its
information.
15. PROTEST PROCEDURES:When a Vendor wishes to protest the award of The Contract awarded by the Division
of Purchase and Contract, or awarded by an agency in an awarded amount of at least $25,000, a Vendor shall
submit a written request addressed to the State Purchasing Officer at: Division of Purchase and Contract, 1305 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1305. A protest request related to an award amount of less than $25,000 shall
be sent to the purchasing officer of the agency that issued the award. The protest request must be received in the
proper office within thirty (30) consecutive calendar days from the date of the Contract award. Protest letters shall
contain specific grounds and reasons for the protest, how the protesting party was harmed by the award made and
any documentation providing support for the protesting party's claims. Note: Contract award notices are sent only
to the Vendor actually awarded the Contract, and not to every person or firm responding to a solicitation. Proposal
status and Award notices are posted on the Internet at https:llwww.ips.state.nc.uslips/. All protests will be handled
pursuant to the North Carolina Administrative Code, 01 NCAC 05B.1519.
16. MISCELLANEOUS: Any gender-specific pronouns used herein, whether masculine or feminine, shall be read and
Ver 4/22/19 Page 29 of 41

Proposal Number. 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
construed as gender neutral, and the singular of any word or phrase shall be read to include the plural and vice
versa.
17. COMMUNICATIONS BY VENDORS: In submitting its proposal, the Vendor agrees not to discuss or otherwise
reveal the contents of its proposal to any source, government or private, outside of the using or issuing agency until
after the award of the Contract or cancellation of this RFP. All Vendors are forbidden from having any
communications with the using or issuing agency,or any other representative of the State concerning the solicitation,
during the evaluation of the proposals (i.e., after the public opening of the proposals and before the award of the
Contract), unless the State directly contacts the Vendor(s) for purposes of seeking clarification or another reason
permitted by the solicitation. A Vendor shall not: (a) transmit to the issuing and/or using agency any information
commenting on the ability or qualifications of any other Vendor to provide the advertised good, equipment,
commodity; (b) identify defects, errors and/or omissions in any other Vendor's proposal and/or prices at any time
during the procurement process; and/or (c) engage in or attempt any other communication or conduct that could
influence the evaluation or award of a Contract related to this RFP. Failure to comply with this requirement shall
constitute sufficient justification to disqualify a Vendor from a Contract award. Only those communications with the
using agency or issuing agency authorized by this RFP are permitted.
18. TABULATIONS: Bid tabulations can be electronically retrieved at the Interactive Purchasing System (IPS),
https://www,ips.state.nc,us/ips/BidNumberSearch.asox. Click on the IPS BIDS icon, click on Search for Bid, enter
the bid number, and then search. Tabulations will normally be available at this web site not later than one working
day after the bid opening. Lengthy or complex tabulations may be summarized,with other details not made available
on IPS, and requests for additional details or information concerning such tabulations cannot be honored.
19. VENDOR REGISTRATION AND SOLICITATION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM: The North Carolina electronic Vendor
Portal(eVP)allows Vendors to electronically register for free with the State to receive electronic notification of current
procurement opportunities for goods and Services of potential interests to them available on the Interactive
Purchasing System, as well as notifications of status changes to those solicitations. Online registration and other
purchasing information is available at the following website: https://ncadmin.nc.cov/about-doa/divisions/purchase-
contract.
20. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: Proposals submitted electronically may be withdrawn at any time prior to the
date for opening proposals identified on the cover page of this RFP(or such later date included in an Addendum to
the RFP). Proposals that have been delivered by hand, U.S. Postal Service, courier or other delivery service may
be withdrawn only in writing and if receipt is acknowledged by the office issuing the RFP prior to the time for opening
proposals identified on the cover page of this RFP(or such later date included in an Addendum to the REP). Written
withdrawal requests shall be submitted on the Vendor's letterhead and signed by an official of the Vendor authorized
to make such request. Any withdrawal request made after the opening of proposals shall be allowed only for good
cause shown and in the sole discretion of the Division of Purchase and Contract.
21. INFORMAL COMMENTS: The State shall not be bound by informal explanations, instructions or information
given at any time by anyone on behalf of the State during the competitive process or after award. The State is
bound only by information provided in writing in this RFP and in formal Addenda issued through IPS.
22. COST FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION: Any costs incurred by Vendor in preparing or submitting offers are the
Vendor's sole responsibility; the State of North Carolina will not reimburse any Vendor for any costs incurred or
associated with the preparation of proposals.
23. VENDOR'S REPRESENTATIVE: Each Vendor shall submit with its proposal the name, address, and telephone
number of the person(s)with authority to bind the firm and answer questions or provide clarification concerning the
firm's proposal,
24. INSPECTION AT VENDOR'S SITE: The State reserves the right to inspect, at a reasonable time, the equipment,
item, plant or other facilities of a prospective Vendor prior to Contract award, and during the Contract term as
necessary for the State's determination that such equipment, item, plant or other facilities conform with the
specifications/requirements and are adequate and suitable for the proper and effective performance of the Contract.
Ver 4122/19 Page 30 of 41

•
Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT C: NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL CONTRACT TERMS & CONDITIONS
1. PERFORMANCE AND DEFAULT:
a) It is anticipated -that the tasks and-duties undertaken-by the-Vendor shall include services or the
manufacturing, furnishing, or development of goods and other tangible features or components as
deliverables that are directly correlated and/or ancillary to the services performed. Except as provided
immediately below, and unless otherwise mutually agreed in writing prior to award, any service deliverables
or ancillary services provided by Vendor in performance of the contract shall remain property of the State.
During performance, Vendor may provide proprietary components as part of the service deliverables that
are identified in the solicitation response. Vendor grants the State a personal, permanent, non-transferable
license to use such proprietary components of the service deliverables and other functionalities, as provided
under this Agreement. Any technical and business information owned by Vendor or its suppliers or licensors
made accessible or furnished to the State shall be and remain the property of the Vendor or such other
party, respectively.Vendor agrees to perform its services under the contract in the same or similar manner
provided to comparable users. The State shall notify the Vendor of any defects or deficiencies in
performance of its services or failure of service deliverables to conform to the standards and specifications
provided in this solicitation. Vendor agrees to remedy defective performance or any nonconforming
deliverables upon timely notice provided by the State.
b) Vendor has a limited, non-exclusive license to access and use State Data provided to Vendor, but solely for
performing its obligations under this Agreement and in confidence as may be further provided herein.Vendor
or its suppliers shall at a minimum,and except as otherwise specified and agreed herein, provide assistance
to the State related to all services performed or deliverables procured hereunder during the State's normal
business hours. Vendor warrants that its support, customer service, and assistance will be performed in
accordance with generally accepted and applicable industry standards.
c) If, through any cause, Vendor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner the obligations under The
Contract, the State shall have the right to terminate The Contract by giving written notice to the Vendor and
specifying the effective date thereof In that event and subject to all other provisions of this contract, all
finished or unfinished deliverable items under this contract prepared by the Vendor shall,at the option of the
State, become its property, and the Vendor shall be entitled to receive compensation for units actually
produced, if any, in an amount determined by reducing the total amount due had the full number of Units
been produced pro rata, such that the ratio of the final compensation actually paid to the original total amount
due in accordance with Attachment A(as amended, if applicable) is equal to the ratio of the Units actually
generated to the total Units identified in Attachment A.
d) In the event of default by the Vendor,the State may procure the goods and services necessary to complete
performance hereunder from other sources and hold the Vendor responsible for any excess cost occasioned
thereby. In addition, in the event of default by the Vendor under The Contract, or upon the Vendor filing a
petition for bankruptcy or the entering of a judgment of bankruptcy by or against the Vendor, the State may
immediately cease doing business with the Vendor, immediately terminate The Contract for cause,and may
take action to debar the Vendor from doing future business with the State.
2. GOVERNMENTAL RESTRICTIONS: In the event any Governmental restrictions are imposed which necessitate
alteration of the goods, material, quality, workmanship or performance of the Services offered prior to acceptance,
it shall be the responsibility of the Vendor to notify the Contract Lead at once, in writing, indicating the specific
regulation which required such alterations.The State reserves the right to accept any such alterations, including any
price adjustments occasioned thereby, or to cancel the Contract,
3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Any and all payments to the Vendor shall be dependent upon and subject to the
availability of funds to the agency for the purpose set forth in The Contract.
4. TAXES:Any applicable taxes shall be invoiced as a separate item.
a) G.S. 143-59.1 bars the Secretary of Administration from entering into Contracts with Vendors if the Vendor
or its affiliates meet one of the conditions of G.S. 105-164.8(b) and refuses to collect use tax on sales of
tangible personal property to purchasers in North Carolina. Conditions under G.S. 105-164.8(b)include: (1)
Ver:4/22/19 Page 31 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Maintenance of a retail establishment or office, (2)Presence of representatives in the State that solicit sales
or transact business on behalf of the Vendor and (3) Systematic exploitation of the market by media-
assisted, media-facilitated, or media-solicited means. By execution of the proposal document the Vendor
certifies that it and all of its affiliates, (if it has affiliates), collect(s)the appropriate taxes:
b) The agency(ies) participating in The Contract are exempt from Federal Taxes, such as excise and
transportation. Exemption forms submitted by the Vendor will be executed and returned by the using agency.
c) Prices offered are not to include any personal property taxes, nor any sales or use tax (or fees) unless
required by the North Carolina Department of Revenue.
5. SITUS AND GOVERNING LAWS:This Contract is made under and shall be governed and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of North Carolina, without regard to its conflict of laws rules, and within which State all
matters, whether sounding in Contract or tort or otherwise, relating to its validity, construction, interpretation and
enforcement shall be determined.
6. PAYMENT TERMS: Payment terms are Net not later than 30 days after receipt of a correct invoice or acceptance
of goods, whichever is later. The using agency is responsible for all payments to the Vendor under the Contract.
Payment by some agencies may be made by procurement card, if the Vendor accepts that card(Visa, MasterCard,
etc.)from other customers, and it shall be accepted by the Vendor for payment under the same terms and conditions
as any other method of payment accepted by the Vendor. If payment is made by procurement card, then payment
may be processed immediately by the Vendor.
7. NON-DISCRIMINATION:
a. The Vendor will take necessary action to comply with all Federal and State requirements concerning fair
employment and employment of people with disabilities, and concerning the treatment of all employees
without regard to discrimination on the basis of any prohibited grounds as defined by Federal and State law.
b. The vendor will take necessary action to ensure its intemal employee policies and procedures are consistent
with Executive Order #82 (Roy Cooper, December 6, 2018), which extends workplace protections and
accommodations to pregnant employees.
8. CONDITION AND PACKAGING: Unless otherwise provided by special terms and conditions or specifications, it is
understood and agreed that any item offered or shipped has not been sold or used for any purpose and shall be in
first class condition.All containers/packaging shall be suitable for handling, storage or shipment.
9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WARRANTY AND INDEMNITY: Vendor shall hold and save the State, its officers,
agents and employees, harmless from liability of any kind, including costs and expenses, resulting from infringement
of the rights of any third party in any copyrighted material, patented or patent-pending invention, article, device or
appliance delivered in connection with The Contract.
a. Vendor warrants to the best of its knowledge that:
I Performance under The Contract does not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of any
third party; and
ii. There are no actual or threatened actions arising from, or alleged under, any intellectual property
rights of any third party;
b. Should any deliverables supplied by Vendor become the subject of a claim of infringement of a patent,
copyright, trademark or a trade secret in the United States, the Vendor, shall at its option and expense,
either procure for the State the right to continue using the deliverables, or replace or modify the same to
become non-infringing. If neither of these options can reasonably be taken in Vendor's judgment, or if
further use shall be prevented by injunction, the Vendor agrees to cease provision of any affected
deliverables and refund any sums the State has paid Vendor and make every reasonable effort to assist
the State in procuring substitute deliverables. If, in the sole opinion of the State,the cessation of use by
the State of any such deliverables due to infringement issues makes the retention of other items acquired
from the Vendor under this Agreement impractical, the State shall then have the option of terminating the
Agreement, or applicable portions thereof,without penalty or termination charge; and Vendor agrees to
refund any sums the State paid for unused Services or Deliverables.
c. The Vendor, at its own expense, shall defend any action brought against the State to the extent that such
action is based upon a claim that the deliverables supplied by the Vendor, their use or operation, infringes
Ver:4/22/19 Page 32 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
on a patent,copyright, trademark or violates a trade secret in the United States. The Vendor shall pay
those costs and damages finally awarded or agreed in a settlement against the State in any such action.
Such defense and payment shall be conditioned on the following:
i. That-the Vendor shall be notified within a reasonable time in writing by the State of any such
claim; and
ii. That the Vendor shall have the sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all
negotiations for its settlement or compromise provided, however,that the State shall have the
option to participate in such action at its own expense.
d. Vendor will not be required to defend or indemnify the State if any claim by a third party against the State
for infringement or misappropriation results from the State's material alteration of any Vendor-branded
deliverables or services, or from the continued use of the deliverable(s)or Services after receiving notice
of infringement on a trade secret of a third party.
10. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: If this contract contemplates deliveries or performance over a period of time,
the State may terminate this contract at any time by providing 60 days'notice in writing from the State to the Vendor.
In that event, any or all finished or unfinished deliverables prepared by the Vendor under this contract shall, at the
option of the State, become its property. If the contract is terminated by the State as provided in this section, the
State shall pay for those items for which such option is exercised, less any payment or compensation previously
made.
11. ADVERTISING:Vendor agrees not to use the existence of The Contract or the name of the State of North Carolina
as part of any commercial advertising or marketing of products or Services. A Vendor may inquire whether the State
is willing to act as a reference by providing factual information directly to other prospective customers.
12. ACCESS TO PERSONS AND RECORDS: During and after the term hereof, the State Auditor and any using
agency's internal auditors shall have access to persons and records related to The Contract to verify accounts and
data affecting fees or performance under the Contract, as provided in G.S. 143-49(9).
13. ASSIGNMENT: No assignment of the Vendor's obligations nor the Vendor's right to receive payment hereunder
shall be permitted.
However, upon written request approved by the issuing purchasing authority and solely as a convenience to the
Vendor, the State may:
a) Forward the Vendor's payment check directly to any person or entity designated by the Vendor,and
b) Include any person or entity designated by Vendor as a joint payee on the Vendor's payment check.
In no event shall such approval and action obligate the State to anyone other than the Vendor and the Vendor shall
remain responsible for fulfillment of all Contract obligations. Upon advance written request, the State may, in its
unfettered discretion, approve an assignment to the surviving entity of a merger, acquisition or corporate
reorganization, if made as part of the transfer of all or substantially all of the Vendor's assets. Any purported
assignment made in violation of this provision shall be void and a material breach of The Contract.
14. INSURANCE:
COVERAGE - During the term of the Contract, the Vendor at its sole cost and expense shall provide commercial
insurance of such type and with such terms and limits as may be reasonably associated with the Contract.As a
minimum, the Vendor shall provide and maintain the following coverage and limits:
a) Worker's Compensation - The Vendor shall provide and maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as
required by the laws of North Carolina, as well as employer's liability coverage with minimum limits of$500,000.00,
covering all of Vendor's employees who are engaged in any work under the Contract in North Carolina. If any work
is sub-contracted,the.Vendor shall require the sub-Contractor to provide the same coverage for any of his employees
engaged in any work under the Contract within the State.
b) Commercial General Liability General Liability Coverage on a Comprehensive Broad Form on an
occurrence basis in the minimum amount of$1,000,000.00 Combined Single Limit. Defense cost shall be in excess
of the limit of liability.
c) Automobile-Automobile Liability Insurance, to include liability coverage, covering all owned, hired and non-
owned vehicles, used within North Carolina in connection with the Contract. The minimum combined single limit
Ver:4/22/19 Page 33 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
shall be $250,000.00 bodily injury and property damage; $250,000.00 uninsured/under insured motorist; and
$2,500.00 medical payment.
REQUIREMENTS -Providing and maintaining adequate insurance coverage is a material obligation of the Vendor
and is of the essence of The Contract. All such insurance shall meet all laws of the State of North Carolina. Such
insurance coverage shall be obtained from companies that are authorized to provide such coverage and that are
authorized by the Commissioner of Insurance to do business in North Carolina.The Vendor shall at all times comply
with the terms of such insurance policies, and all requirements of the insurer under any such insurance policies,
except as they may conflict with existing North Carolina laws or The Contract. The limits of coverage under each
insurance policy maintained by the Vendor shall not be interpreted as limiting the Vendor's liability and obligations
under the Contract.
15. GENERAL INDEMNITY: The Vendor shall hold and save the State, its officers, agents, and employees, harmless
from liability of any kind, including all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any other person,firm,or corporation
furnishing or supplying work, Services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of The Contract,
and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm, or corporation that may be injured
or damaged by the Vendor in the performance of The Contract and that are attributable to the negligence or
intentionally tortious acts of the Vendor provided that the Vendor is notified in writing within 30 days from the date
that the State has knowledge of such claims.The Vendor represents and warrants that it shall make no claim of any
kind or nature against the State's agents who are involved in the delivery or processing of Vendor deliverables or
Services to the State. The representation and warranty in the preceding sentence shall survive the termination or
expiration of The Contract.
16. ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT:
a) Purchasing shall be conducted through the Statewide E-Procurement Service. The State's third-party agent shall
serve as the Supplier Manager for this E-Procurement Service. The Vendor shall register for the Statewide E-
Procurement Service within two (2) business days of notification of award in order to receive an electronic purchase
order resulting from award of this contract.
b) THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER(S) SHALL PAY A TRANSACTION FEE OF 1.75% (.0175) ON THE TOTAL
DOLLAR AMOUNT (EXCLUDING SALES TAXES) OF ALL GOODS INCLUDED ON EACH PURCHASE ORDER
ISSUED THROUGH THE STATEWIDE E-PROCUREMENT SERVICE.This applies to all purchase orders, regardless
of the quantity or dollar amount of the purchase order. The transaction fee shall not be stated or included as a separate
item on the invoice. There are no additional fees or charges to the Vendor for the services rendered by the Supplier
Manager under this contract. Vendor will receive a credit for transaction fees they paid for the purchase of any item(s)
if an item(s) is returned through no fault of the Vendor. Transaction fees are non-refundable when an item is rejected
and returned, or declined, due to the Vendor's failure to perform or comply with specifications or requirements of the
contract.
c)Vendor or its Authorized Reseller, as applicable,will be invoiced monthly for the State's transaction fee by the Supplier
Manager. The transaction fee shall be based on a) purchase activity for the prior month, or b) purchases for which the
supplier invoice has been paid. Unless Supplier Manager receives written notice from the Vendor identifying with
specificity any errors in an invoice for the transaction fee within thirty (30) days of the receipt of invoice, such invoice
shall be deemed to be correct and Vendor shall have waived its right to later dispute the accuracy and completeness of
the invoice. Payment of the transaction fee by the Vendor is due to the account designated by the State within thirty
(30)days after receipt of the invoice for the transaction fee. If payment of the transaction fee is not received by the State
within this payment period, it shall be considered a material breach of contract. Pursuant to G.S. 147-86.23,the Service
will charge interest and late payment penalties on past due balances. Interest shall be charged at the rate set by the
Secretary of Revenue pursuant to G.S. 105-241.21 as of the date the balances are past due. The late-payment penalty
will be ten percent(10%)of the account receivable. Within thirty(30)days of the receipt of invoice,Vendor may dispute
in writing the accuracy of an invoice. No interest shall be charged on disputed and overdue amounts to the extent the
State agrees to reduce or adjust the amount in dispute. The Supplier Manager shall provide, whenever reasonably
requested by the Vendor in writing(including electronic documents), supporting documentation from the E-Procurement
Service that accounts for the amount of the invoice.
d) The Supplier Manager will capture the order from the State approved user, including the shipping and payment
information,and submit the order in accordance with the E-Procurement Service. Subsequently, the Supplier Manager
Ver:4/22/19 Page 34 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
will send those orders to the appropriate Vendor on State Contract. The State or State-approved user, not the Supplier
Manager, shall be responsible for the solicitation, bids received, evaluation of bids received,award of contract, and the
payment for goods delivered.
e)Vendor shall at all times maintain the confidentiality of its user name and password for the Statewide E-Procurement
Services. If Vendor is a corporation, partnership or other legal entity, then the Vendor may authorize its employees to
use its password. Vendor shall be responsible for all activity and all charges by such employees. Vendor agrees not to
permit a third party to use the Statewide E-Procurement Services through its account. If there is a breach of security
through the Vendor's account, Vendor shall immediately change its password and notify the Supplier Manager of the
security breach by email. Vendor shall cooperate with the State and the Supplier Manager to mitigate and correct any
security breach.
17. SUBCONTRACTING: Performance under The Contract by the Vendor shall not be subcontracted without prior
written approval of the State's assigned Contract Lead. Unless otherwise agreed in writing,acceptance of a Vendor's
proposal shall include approval to use the subcontractor(s) that have been specified therein.
18. CONFIDENTIALITY: Any State information, data, instruments, documents, studies or reports given to or prepared
or assembled by or provided to the Vendor under The Contract shall be kept as confidential, used only for the
purpose(s) required to perform The Contract and not divulged or made available to any individual or organization
without the prior written approval of the State.
19. CARE OF STATE DATA AND PROPERTY: The Vendor agrees that it shall be responsible for the proper custody
and care of any data owned and furnished to the Vendor by the State (State Data), or other State property in the
hands of the Vendor, for use in connection with the performance of The Contract or purchased by or for the State
for The Contract.Vendor will reimburse the State for loss or damage of such property while in Vendor's custody.
The State's Data in the hands of the Vendor shall be protected from unauthorized disclosure, loss, damage,
destruction by a natural event or other eventuality.Such State Data shall be returned to the State in a form acceptable
to the State upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. The Vendor shall notify the State of any security
breaches within 24 hours as required by G.S. 143E-1379. See G.S. 75-60 et seq.
20. OUTSOURCING: Any Vendor or subcontractor providing call or contact center services to the State of North
Carolina or any of its agencies shall disclose to inbound callers the location from which the call or contact center
services are being provided.
If, after award of a contract, the contractor wishes to relocate or outsource any portion of performance to a location
outside the United States, or to contract with a subcontractor for any such performance, which subcontractor and
nature of the work has not previously been disclosed to the State in writing, prior written approval must be obtained
from the State agency responsible for the contract.
Vendor shall give notice to the using agency of any relocation of the Vendor, employees of the Vendor,
subcontractors of the Vendor, or other persons providing performance under a State contract to a location outside
of the United States.
21. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: Vendor shall comply with all laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations, and
licensing requirements that are applicable to the conduct of its business and its performance in accordance with
The Contract, including those of federal, state, and local agencies having jurisdiction and/or authority.
22. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This RFP and any documents incorporated specifically by reference represent the entire
agreement between the parties and supersede all prior oral or written statements or agreements. This RFP, any
addenda hereto, and the Vendor's proposal are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth verbatim.
All promises, requirements, terms, conditions, provisions, representations, guarantees, and warranties contained
herein shall survive the contract expiration or termination date unless specifically provided otherwise herein, or
unless superseded by applicable Federal or State statutes of limitation.
23. ELECTRONIC RECORDS: The State will digitize all Vendor responses to this solicitation, if not received
electronically, as well as any awarded contract together with associated procurement-related documents. These
electronic copies shall constitute a preservation record and shall serve as the official record of this procurement
Ver:4/22/19 Page 35 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
with the same force and effect as the original written documents comprising such record. Any electronic copy,
printout or other output readable by sight shown to reflect such record accurately shall constitute an"original."
24. AMENDMENTS: This Contract may be amended only by a written amendment duly executed by the State and the
Vendor.
25. NO WAIVER: Notwithstanding any other language or provision in The Contract, nothing herein is intended nor
shall be interpreted as a waiver of any right or remedy otherwise available to the State under applicable law. The
waiver by the State of any right or remedy on any one occasion or instance shall not constitute or be interpreted
as a waiver of that or any other right or remedy on any other occasion or instance.
26. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither party shall be deemed to be in default of its obligations hereunder if and so long as it
is prevented from performing such obligations as a result of events beyond its reasonable control, including without
limitation, fire, power failures, any act of war, hostile foreign action, nuclear explosion, riot, strikes or failures or
refusals to perform under subcontracts, civil insurrection, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, or other catastrophic
natural event or act of God.
•
27. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: Notwithstanding any other term or provision in The Contract, nothing herein is intended
nor shall be interpreted as waiving any claim or defense based on the principle of sovereign immunity or other State
or federal constitutional provision or principle that otherwise would be available to the State under applicable law.
Ver:4/22/19 Page 36 of 41

ProposalWildlands Engineering,16 20190301 Vendor: 9 9, Inc.
ATTACHMENT D: LOCATION OF WORKERS UTILIZED BY VENDOR
In accordance with NC General Statute 143-59.4,the Vendor shall detail the location(s)at which performance will occur,
as well as the manner in which it intends to utilize resources or workers outside of the United States in the performance
of this Contract. The State will evaluate the additional risks, costs, and other factors associated with such-utilization prior
to making an award. Please complete items a, b, and c below.
a) Will any work under this Contract be performed outside the United States? El YES ® NO
If the Vendor answered"YES"above, Vendor must complete items 1 and 2 below:
1. List the location(s) outside the United States where work under this Contract will be performed by the Vendor,
any sub-Contractors, employees, or other persons performing work under the Contract:
n/a
2. Describe the corporate structure and location of corporate employees and activities of the Vendor, its affiliates
or any other sub-Contractors that will perform work outside the U.S.:
n/a
b) The Vendor agrees to provide notice,in writing to the State,of the relocation of the
Vendor,employees of the Vendor, sub-Contractors of the Vendor,or other persons Ll YES ❑ NO
performing services under the Contract outside of the United States
NOTE:All Vendor or sub-Contractor personnel providing call or contact center services to
the State of North Carolina under the Contract shall disclose to inbound callers the
location from which the call or contact center services are being provided.
c) Identify all U.S. locations at which performance will occur:
Design: Charlotte and Asheville, NC/Survey: Asheville, NC
Ver:4/22/19 Page 37 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Midlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT E: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Name of Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
The undersigned hereby certifies that: [check all applicable boxes]
O The Vendor is in sound financial condition and, if applicable, has received an unqualified audit opinion for the
latest audit of its financial statements.
Date of latest audit: nla
® The Vendor has no outstanding liabilities, including tax and judgment liens, to the Internal Revenue Service or
any other government entity.
® The Vendor is current in all amounts due for payments of federal and state taxes and required employment-
related contributions and withholdings.
LX^I The Vendor is not the subject of any current litigation or findings of noncompliance under federal or state law.
® The Vendor has not been the subject of any past or current litigation, findings in any past litigation, or findings
of noncompliance under federal or state law that may impact in any way its ability to fulfill the requirements of
this Contract.
Ki He or she is authorized to make the foregoing statements on behalf of the Vendor.
Note: This is a continuing certification and Vendor shall notify the Contract Lead within 15 days of any material
change to any of the representations made herein.
If any one or more of the foregoing boxes is NOT checked, Vendor shall explain the reason in the space below:
Box#1: Our CPA has recommended that a full audit is not necessary for firm of our size. Our CPA performs
an annual CPA review of our financials for our bonding company, produces quarterly statements for cur
bonding company, and is actively involved in reconciliations and our other regular accounting duties on a
monthly basis. Wildlands is in sound financial condition.
3a11144-"---------- 03/26/2020
ture Date
Shawn D. Wilkerson President
Printed Name Title
[This Certification must be signed by an individual authorized to speak for the Vendor]
Ver 4122/19 Page 38 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT F: SUPPLEMENTAL VENDOR INFORMATION
HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES
Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBS) consist of minority, women and disabled business firms that are at least
fifty-one percent owned and operated by an individual(s) of the categories. Also included in this category are disabled
business enterprises and non-profit work centers for the blind and severely disabled.
Pursuant to G.S. 143B-1361(a), 143-48 and 143-128.4, the State invites and encourages participation in this
procurement process by businesses owned by minorities, women, disabled, disabled business enterprises and non-
profit work centers for the blind and severely disabled. This includes utilizing subcontractors to perform the required
functions in this RFP.Any questions concerning NC HUB certification,contact the North Carolina Office of Historically
Underutilized Businesses at(919) 807-2330. The Vendor shall respond to question#1 and#2 below.
a) Is Vendor a Historically Underutilized Business? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Is Vendor Certified with North Carolina as a Historically Underutilized Business? ❑ Yes ® No
If so, state HUB classification:
Ver:4122/19 Page 39 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190301 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT G: VENDOR'S INFORMATION
Vendors Primary Contact(or Project Manager)
Name: Eric Neuhaus, PE
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: Water Resources Engineer
Address: 167-B Haywood Rd.
City: Asheville State/Zip:
NC,28806
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Vendors Execution Address(Where the contract should be mailed for signature)
Name: Shawn D.Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: President
Address: 1430 S. Mint Street,Suite 104
City: Charlotte State/Zip: NC.28203
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Vendors Payment(Remit To)Address(Where the checks should be mailed
(This address should agree with the"Remit-To"address associated with the Vendor's Tax ID.This information
must be verified with the Vendor's Corporate Accounting Office)
Name: Shawn D.Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: President
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street, Suite 104
City: Charlotte State/Zip: NC,28203
Telephone: [phone] Fax:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Ver:4/22/19 Page 40 of 41

Instructions:
1. Immediately save this with your new, desired filename.
2. Fill out all areas highlighted in yellow.
3. Place the letter "x" in appropriate box for multiple choice questions.
Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria
8-digit CU Rating Form
Offeror:
Site Name:
River Basin
/ Catalog
Unit:
RFP
Number:
Date of Site
Evaluation:
Type/Amt of
Mitigation
Offered:
Proposal
Review
Committee:
Alternate
Attendees:

Section 1. Minimum Requirements
Yes/No
or N/A
1-For stream mitigation projects,does the Technical Proposal adequately document the historical presence of
stream(s)on the project site, provide the drainage areas(acres)and provide accurate, process-based Yes
descriptionsof all project stream reaches and tributaries?
2-For proposals that include wetland mitigation, does the technical proposal adequately document the
presence of hydric soil indicators(including soil boring logs prepared by a Licensed Soil Scientist and a map Yes
showing soil boring locations and mapped soil series)?
3-For proposals that include wetland mitigation, does the proposed success hydroperiod follow the IRT
Guidance for the project site and soil series?If the proposed hydroperiod differs from the IRT guidance, Yes
justification must beprovided in the RFP.
4-Does the proposal adequately document the physical,chemical and/or biological impairments that
currently exist on the project site? Yes
5-Does DMS agree with the overall mitigation approach (proposed levels of intervention) presented? [The
Technical Proposal must demonstrate that the proposed mitigation activities are appropriate for existing site
conditions and watershed characteristics(e.g.,adjacent land use/land cover), and are optimized to yield
Yes
maximum functional gains.]
6-Does DMS agree with the proposed credit structure(s)described in the proposal? Yes
7-Does the proposed project avoid significant adverse impacts to existing wetlands and/or streams? Yes
8-Does the proposal adequately describe how the project will advance DMS watershed planning goals? Yes
9-For any proposed Priority 2 restoration, is P2 justified and/or limited to "tie-ins"? Yes
An answer of No in this section means the Technical Proposal is rejected. Continue or Reject? Continue

Section 2. Functional Uplift Evaluation
Functional Functional Stressor Functional Uplift Potential Planning Identified Stressor
Category
Complete this section for identified
Place an X below if stressor is
Check boxes below to functional stressors ONLY. Place an X
identified through watershed
identify stressors addressed under the option that best describes the
planning-only count the MOST
by proposal. uplift potential for the majority of the
LOCAL plan.
project area.
Low Mod High Very High TRA RWP LWP
Non-functioning
riparian buffer/
wetland vegetation
Sediment
Nutrients
N
Fecal Coliform
Other
Peak Flows
b.° nArtificial Barriers
O
—0 if Ditching/Draining
2
Other
Habitat Fragmentation
Limited Bedform
CO
Diversity
co Absence of Large
_ Woody Debris
Other
Total Count Total
1 2 6 1 Count 10 0 0
c 0 Multiplier
co x1 x3 x6 x10 x 2 x4 x6
CO
C: V) Count x Function Count
•0 b.O Multiplier 1 Planning 20 0 0
U p 6 36 10 Multiplier
C
23 Sum of Function A Sum of
53 Planning 20

Adjusted Risk Factor ❑✓ Only Applicable if this Box is Checked
Total Restoration Enhancement Total Restoration and Enhancement Feet Risk Adjusted Score
and Enhancement Restoration Feet Enhancement feet a c
Feet Restoration Feet+��) (Sum of Function X Factor )
Feet
C D
12,874 9,691 3,183 1.14 60.42
Risk Adjusted ScoreD+ PlanningB = Total Function and Planning 80.42
Section 3. General (place an X in the appropriate box)
1pt 3 pts 6 pts 10 pts
What percent of the request does the proposed <40% 40-60% 61-99% 100%
wetland project provide?
(if applicable)
What percent of the request does the proposed < 30% 30-50% 51-75% >75%
stream project provide?
(if applicable)
>5% 2-5% <2% None
Physical constraints or barriers
>12 8-12 0-8
Easement Continuity
>10 8-10 4-8 <4
Project Density
Total General
2 6 6 14
Section 4. Final Score and Proposal Rating
Total Function and E
80.42
Planning
Total General F
14
Final Score (E + F)
94.42
Proposal Rating(Final
0.944
Score x 0.01)

: .Waco ••%`' ,JJ\ i
./. .. -- •� yI 030501020700�11y0
03050102050020
_. .' .
! •�• Catawba
'.'; Buffalo Creek %�
. . ;((ings Mountain Reservoir)-0 L.
River .
> n �=•.. / Basin
•
Broad T . . 1
•
River . /1 )i /.1
Basin 03050102070020 .fA
. . . . : I. . . : : �� t
"--,••,1 / I ` 03050105100020 A , • - •_ • -
• * NC Helicopters
h •/ :" _ #411441.. 'rmand Furrnace(1Mashieg'ton Fui[iance) : •
• . . •jr (SJo r sfWRa4e). . . . \ii
\\.‘,
sr lou _ � Bessemer City 41 r-. Resevo �r ^Y ��y� C)r�,_ ./ Project Location �r s
`ryShelby (Catchment ID 12034601) ,_ , ) -�
. . „/ . /,<„..#„/ , , . ...Jo, , . N.......--...,
Davidsgn Elementary I • -
-Arl
Yhool ��
!- �/ -- -- - -. US-74 � �'•' ... „lice
+ � JG,e5.29 G .44
�T 1
--/ �' _ - �C_ntral School Historic District C;Qe B
__- - - - US-74 BUS _ US-74 B '1. t'te
0C; • --West End Historic District Gastonia -
t -• .:- Ki�s Moantain r
/_ / - _ i eel .> .
/ vt
0305 0510- / _ •"f Margrace Mill Village !et9 Gastonia
Historic District �a
- -JF ��
I)Ei
Jacob S.Mauney Memorial Library
m. ` --_; Crowders Mount176-
/ and Teacher's Home
r_, 44*, f, State Park ��e
. 4O I o ach
"_` u.,!!Fit
f'' _ - _ _ - 03050105120014 v•
:4„
,,1 ;i:.'-—i..:e tC,r,-r il,1-Jakes Branch'', _
/ / f Catawba Lands
j e� _1,- '
F ' SGf 'rowdersMa fain '+ Conservancy
R(ri. �`qg ,. State Pa ] Easement
,. 03050105140010
_ ncn / o
NC-
Project Location Water Quality TRA I NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas
Li Five Mile Radius ///, Habitat TRA r/A Local Watershed Plan
_--j County Line Hydrology TRA IP 303d Listed Streams
Municipalities ; ; ; : Water Supply Watershed CZ Airports
GRiver Basin NC Historic Preservation Areas
L,_,; Hydrologic Unit Code(14-Digit) Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
611ZWILDLANDS 0 0.75 1.5 Miles , Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I I N Broad River Basin 03050105
Cleveland County, NC

.T 0 r,//.:.•i ._.,- _,_-.„ - irk . . ;a.
_ _
_ •' s ' 7 -..� Proposed Conservation Easement Intermittent Stream 0 Headcut
�� _: �,
" .
.. -��� , 'y Project Parcels Ephemeral Channel Livestock Wallow
1
or��On//.�,, y ti s] -• ' / �• Potential Existing Wetlands Non-Project Stream Debris in Channel
/ &i%,; Utility Easement(100') Bank Erosion Tile Drains
/ 0 • ,...•-----.._ \ issilliatapiiiligia
Kings Mountain Water Easement("20') Incision _ Bedrock
/ j\ • ,// Existing Cattle Pasture Ditching — Stormwater Outfall
(N ` ' Existing Horse Pasture Utility Lines
`� j cif �� Perennial Stream 0 Utility Poles
0
��p'o 1�`�+ ® Reach Breaks
•�a• �i J� ter, i
- � r m r. Il.••••°7---
ia �'
,. � 4/ //,/..///1„.P4/.'
? � `�
yam 4y I ' ' '� 41
' - 311efor• k. . -......, .,----. -- : : 1 ��b. l / ^�
/
"-----0-- --- -• __-- \ .:1•. , .v . -, Gagoa€3 -........._..\
/ir-
i ,
•
, .'' 1 -----N.
\. ..,,„\ ,./..„, / , _
tom, „.., , ' ' �. ,, •,.... ., , , ', ....117
. /Nf ./-,... / JJ/e
,------ __.---.
.ram 1 0 ,, : '-,.i. . . . • , „. // / ,/,/f / , i `�zria.
/ .--,/,
, /
io
\ -: \ . Creek-' ',� sa , ,.b.,/
i///�fi///� I r �r//,„/2/ �� ,
. li.___-____•:,.„ •, Ir.., _ _ . ,
_... cr,...,:...,,,,:r.s.„:,17/v,..)14/,,.////////// .
7
/ /
/..„. ......
... . -.... .
-,•1/ /, ../,/„ ._///:' /1, /7", /4/ ,.-- ..
1. ... / . ...„ / ./// // //9 /A///_e' ®
---_,\.:-:-- 4 .•;•-• .1-- \......._
,,11'--
--__------- N., ; . . • -- , -- r., 4,,.. „ , '',..... -..,.• , • // / /7 / / e A NI is 0 r,
.-"•,, . . .......... /.'- ° --- ./X., . ' ° i.V// - ' ,
V'
?x.. i s.. % •/ 7/ , / / / Existing Pond " T
;' _ us
, // i /,/1% '///i/7i fr %,. , ,
./:://:/0////1/
.4 i` -- 71` _Hial]c44ir .'' !',-f •,• j / / r / // //` / / e,/f ir ,1/4J./
1 _•. •i.' �,�r d f fit//// / / f f/ //�/ / ; lam -'
,: A. \/// J ///J , ' / / / 4- Cek./ \; Bridgefork .N
�/ /i,///ce Air, ,-.,..,/ r_., '
... ....:„.-, ----r=
. .
.,, ...? ._ - ,. mi,,,, /i /� ` '� Existing • _ , � ...,,....
_ �-
//� / Tile Drain ✓. f •. r .J /"` /- " ' ice! .. ti
i: , • #* .`'''" r ‘:' ..-- , , • ,
f�19'Aeria -• ;�A\ ' ` \ --• _-` _`ice -
Figure 2 Site Map
W I L D L A N D S Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 400 Feet BroadRiver Basin 03050105
Cleveland County, NC

Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcels
I
)1,4; ■
r
PLs,,,..
a ,..
ir
/ ♦ r
♦
i •
/ ` ` • to123
r
♦ /
•
9i wA .. ♦
�f •
♦ I'
ter / d .
.•'
•
i
\` - \�, I ♦
.� • _••\ _r_♦• �/. / . -
•
•. \•` - i ♦
\� \` / --•.
•
• ,`♦ •..--� - -ter r� ♦ ��.`-- {;1
•
5% \ .
:3'"------.....•-•-- -,,,,,-.
[. Y1 Q. f f re'''' ■
< C3S r
z
. idol. w. �■
1aw'
�rgcn �' 1
5�
0315
Waco, NC USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map
0140,111, W I L D L A N D S 0 400 Feet Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERIN G BroadRiver Basin 03050105
N Cleveland County, NC

_ icy .i _e;�.'.:.v,• �� `'�::.!:a•,- ylo.
1 a i ;iY'',i{ti'I :'Yti;. s %•:;'mow
,{ _ _ Proposed Conservation Easement
sr.:
. . ' --:7- CL2 ''' ..' *`' ' e -„ ,,
0, cm aczora3
, otrz, .. ,
q00 _ �, f • . 'fir .,„., g "r r. Watershed
r 4. } _' { +riff t"' [ Subwatersheds
r .e, ,, ,. ,Sir .' xif
- - _ 1. tea. +4" Cree/r r'
of -gJ , ' OF 1, .,c '1 i• Project Streams
:cf.' a r , . a•
Ir.._ :. `: ° • -. - t. ." IP.."°�'".W, Non Project Stream
-�. ':} . . - -A4 • as - v'y' o4.�.y; .. f�-. A(t��f�
.::
960
\ ... Y ' -I' ' \ • '
■ ' IN A
-.,-y u,-r. V
- 300acres -k :
yy‘s . .,jili ..k.. '14' ik ,. . • nt . _ ,_ '
49
.- _ Yam", i• .N. . .
Fs.
, ii
_.,
�� :.. ',.. + ja m -', , - UT4 • G� �t1� •; a
t: 1 ,. - ,,` r � 113 acres UT4A `. f ,
ar'
K y ��::
-m^ ,''-*-- 4'4, +3:•
`-`� �' tS "�Y4:;r'."' 95 acres y, _ •'•'• _ yaa� ..;‘,. ...,. ......co
�° Bridgefork Creek • i G Rr.�. .i;' • 1 . `f
1,300 acres a0 ,,; 'k " _, F
!}ram! ' edo' s. W. �e�•' �'. 96e -46-;_ '4'd,•,,- L---
UT6A _iF
�` :' 16 acre r•' =`
" . Bridgefork Creek .- ,s*
,'� ;ti:,� :.w./,.. ,. . . q00 px 1,300 acres z: S it
, ,;r rY ro°
;; rr — A J ` rr�b . Bridgefork Creek °.;
E j e `yak' - _ r rt°" -r -�� •
'\ ) r 1 '.
te x44 c
i_ :
eat Bridgefork Cre •e =::,
Q].: ` —� i
6,4 N, 4 d.:r
L'iee,� �— y,�r41'+ `� r �r"[„ k.'a RIB:� .v 6- �� d`sowna n •H•:y �A L IS : ~
p
1 'f, .� • Ir O' � � '` - 'iI y- Sae - - i .- _ - ��. _ -.�i�i �`�►
J r Ii{ ' .. + rr a /.•: 4...t.
;TIP
'i.. .
�.� � 1 .9r ! • ,XF � '. " f � � sae ` �1;�
Jn yw4 A ,1 �`
*. - p _ 4 acres pn -�50� 1 a �,((� s
Y - 4 - -- '[s-1I..f _'�S+eu /, f 4 i,y� --*y JM1. .�, vlF s e
` .1 _ I -16T. _ v A. 1 C' • + - u, L ^tea+ �1��7 sa
1100111. c, � 1 •• , se 4 ' 4 , /;*'�1?<4 UT3 16 acres ' i
~ .L.:."tiy c��A• 1 �• _A 4- t _�- ..hd- � .•. } _Pa[lenun •
App
'* 4i i, - 7 v\ ., 4 • 0 ,,., ir:" .. '..- ,
oe
r y-;. aa0 ge
2019 Aeria 'Photography `` _-i- - 86e 8 4+;,
,:ram r e. r6~'
Figure 4 Watershed Map
OlgiNv WILD L A N D S Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 1,000 Feet Broad River Basin 03050105
Cleveland County, NC

.. / ___ i. • . . ." 1 .. , ,-,----Ff.---V,-:--;--------:::-.'-::- • ' t. ; -J r'.I, 'it. ' - I.--•
irr-• -,-..• .. , — ' f,••• .•-•
..., ... ._ , - 171 1 , - --. --.--- - . a j . ( . „.., i 4 ,.,_ ,..„---- _L___. ? _ -,--...-_-- .,,,_, (bgt-'4411111 :•4
c.
,:i .§,- ' A.,....:.„A''• •
.. . - / . r. - --- -...-•'' -
,0,- :it //;...,.I.', . .
.,•.1 • . _
03 I :.:-. I. ,. . '..- r.. .../h" r? I
. 1 ... '.--- `<kL5- . / J.. 1 ' / 4: ' ' __----__: .-.7. , .. w lir . (i{ 1 t.,,, ,., ,N.:- , ___----._ lapprar.,- .t..
- -_ j, . • si 7Pr I Proposed Conservation Easement
. -.., — , t. --- ./ . 7 44 • .,\ ', ... ,. 7.' --...-''''-:
r. ,Atry • • , .- ',SI•' ..1 i
- c,. 2-i i 1 r.--.alfily : 7: -, ' J 1,..Ad
1 .---,-.7, lir 1. ' "-firr 'fr•- . ' limr
(
. .• -t-_-- - ..-1., '4,51 ' .4,'y4:1 1-Z :5-1e,t1/4.'. .' -''.--.''''
4 .....*„.... . : : -17..,.4., r. . Project Parcels
L
- . -• • t, .-- -..::,-----.,:-----.. 4' .. _ . . . „,
. . • - __ ... . ". . - •
. . ... •
-
, ,. • • ,--- ----- . ,
Clo
' '
Perennial Stream
Q2 ti -... • • 1 - ._._ __ -.--_
. . . . LL. .
. . 86
/ hA , &i. .
' r•-• -.-t_ ,„
- -'1.-•- •..r.-441T-4- .,', *to.' Intermittent Stream
. . "• .. • ..• . : . • . . . . . lir. ,
HtC '
..,„ . . • ••!4
f
./ . --_ , Non-Project Stream
— -5,•-........t 21 • 1
r , • A A sf-, \•.
a. - - - , . , ,rt• . ., . -_....._ • „..0 jt.,..,F. ..t.,, -41"4-..... . . . • . - --
- :. Soils
'•--, - . ' 4 'i' '0/. -4 ' ' . -•.•
Z., •L---_----- .' 5 .?., ". •''''e
_, -. ' . •... e-. ChA-Chewacla loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,
_.-. ....
, • , - -• -,,_
, ------ • ././ /' - ..../ if*
• ,e. *
1\. ' . i - •,
A
ti frequently flooded
IL i'-€ ---••.. ...____,,--,-"./...-;/C1,'I '' 4 -•' ,,,,
i.i_ • ./
- ' ' . GrD-Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30
1 CV'
/ WI
.116,..\.-i•-•,------",/ft 0 • ...-r•-•------ ' 1 .,.
-
percent slopes, rocky
It Riti / -• / 4" ? •-• * '
. .
• ,
1 1 ...
• J •----, z' , , .. ., , 4,‘31.4. /.•
•
,,• .. i.r• 414-1 '' HtC-Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15
• ...,/, „..,-• .
,..• .. _- - / I percent slopes, stony
..-- - ., ,-....,,,... t, • ..... / ,,,.0.4. ... 45'- _.
''''''- - 0,4-4. 4-(
•-•ik \ '' 4 glIA* ' •
e ci) McC2-Madison-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15
_A--. 7 , ' P,,if 4
cbc° ikr..
..' • c,'
47 01° ' percent slopes,very stony, moderately eroded
1 ' GrDs, .. k, i 7 )
I HtC , •---
4-44_
- .
' V HtC 1 HtC
..------ ce .-0• _ , „1-•.•... .
-lir .. „....44, ., . .
-4,3 ,,,, _, . . .
. .., • - --'`.
AN \ \-,,,, ., ., ... ... •
...
. ..,:. . ---
,,
• Vo •
,, e
vic•
,
760
..,V;WI., 4, • ■ in HtC ) • s., ' -,:--;."."-- -----
.
--'''_ ------ - :>- • % ..., ..,
4. ..--
_ ... ...-:...: .1 i. • •
%. t, -.2 .., - ••'"----- -.:.z_ '4, ...- --,-." ..;•
i .72
P ..
• - 111111 __-.7_,;v rf;
• _t \, '.. L. rky,e,t. i :.,., . ,
... •7, Oric c ---- ,- ,, - -.% w N4F, . • ...•
reek --- . ••••• HtC I i A .
;' '"''
__ ___-- GrD % „•-,-
1- , , --- ._- .-`,04'.' 4 •.,,AL.- .,...., ,',.,•.. • .4./%0.
f ' '. '•4 -----,---- i',., • •-'.•
Opp
*. ', '. "...,•_•t/...... .
'-- -
. -___ •___ , /. -
• . .00,
•0/14, -
N lk-
- ••• .il'',- '
-
i
..i i '4' •
... ,
,I
i .
. .4:, ..
,,.p '
• - -, • --•- -,..,.. GrD -;, ' d
,,_ -`,,.• /- ___----_,„,.„--17----; .7 ,,, ,. '----------s ‘--------0. \ .../.,•-' .• --;-'.. __.---- - ii, , 1,4 . ".i.,.. : •*47.0 ,,‘ , ,
- . ..„,.
_,/. ..,.. ., ,
•
0,
1 . .,.-/..-„, . __--___- . -7-_,--, .. ._. . _,•:„.,.. ,.....__.,....., ,, , . . .. , ,,,,,,,. .. % •
i • . 1 . --",
. , .. • ,' „ . - AV:•.f
, 1. ;. 1 j i '..I/5, -..- ,..-4,.... , v- • ..• ..•••, r .7f '1% /it
IF "1.-..,4
.3 St. 11111,4' iii.k....A.,44„,... . ....1HtC: .,4. - .-'•• ".4ss;.I/T- Nig:Ca-46-
' I ' r r ' .1 'L ., L' .0..i, '.. a @I P
4 44.,, '•,,i)3.4. -./
# ) . , , v „:„.. , - 651. .. . , ...ii• ,.. 7: ' .. • --0.7• . ___. .-... . • . A. -''' i
•__,• •,,_ __..-- 4
'.. 1 •••••_....\ ', '•- •• P • 4' . .43 * -'1. '-'4\ '''..---__. -4 .•:' • ------:-. --. • _ _
'b' idliti•
. • . .,.+74. ,r--..•---,1t *----N„ .. ., .
eather c. ..---____ -..: tn;;,
:,...' .' ,_ / a.I ,,,.., .
-__. , % . • c - -.1* ' • - 44, — -1 'ik- GrD..., ..
-, . ---- • ' \ '.• •N. '' 'ts, '\ \ . . , . „
• - 4, - ,L. 80
,. :71-11,...1-1-. , ` ,_s. ' v i..., .. Bridlefork Creek r#,..-1i'..7... ,
, ....
iv .9 -, ". .
ChA - 170--;"-'•::_ ,4,•ri•- - 1A:111 ,..--/'-'19*-•
\ ••• --- ---------- . N \'- \ — ..„---•'' . "
• • \ As ik-1114 _ ..,,,.. ',.1.7-., - -_. .,-•-_-....4.47_
..__ -,,,
..L
-•'-
-,. , ___
_ ..,
.._....
..,. _.r
40, _ _----
?..,.. _. ..-- --- • - . . .:...,,-AI*
. .-, , . . \. , . '-.--•c -frik,..,r "4 --.... ... _ ....0-- -..-..-= --.
,. , "..... :.„. .
,.., .._. i
, , ©56515!:
s.
.____ .___ ...
, I , ., '-,-- • ' ----=--f------- ---- -- -. . - HtC ' CSiO /3“ '— --`' ...1
' 6.,..,0 - ,- • "--, __ . • - .-_ _ , ._ ,
, - . A,
--,T,-•-. 47 f 411k..... ,
. -_. --., _ .
- " -
__---
---,':-- c . . ‘,
t•-,'...t„• , , -1
' - -- - -- C._ 1, • .111-'' IN
- , :.•••ft•.„. N
- .. .,• - • ," , •• • ■ __._-011.1!• a. - - - - - - - -- - I, ---*
-- •fie , .,, ''' ., - --111 :
.., .•. ' it - .„..............•••'-":-- ._._ .
-
•,-- -I it — 41.1.1.- t .
••• - .:', \'
•tt t . ' L'. ' • ''' 'HtC v ' '' •-L-----.
,'. •
, 0 . ....;,...-
Ik.'L:,•, .4 , • '1.4 ^ 6 . ..----__----
r19-Aeria 0 4• .,2•• - -, ', ..... ,, 'I' 1, '\0.-.184.•_..% . -•', - - • • •.% • „
. _
Figure 5 Soils Map
11111111111rwILD Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERINSG 0 400 Feet BroadRiver Basin 03050105
ri'I I Cleveland County, NC
1

7. �� ;m
' s - ti,; �• �— I Proposed Conservation Easement Restoration Ditches (to be filled)
f air
J7 'k.
' \'l _` -,��- +,I.' l y � Project Parcels Enhancement II 8 i Crossings
� _ i i. ,
go ` , _ r Wetland Rehabilitation (0.11 Ac) Preservation Stormwater Outfall
1
T
fr sse•
".� \\ Wetland Re Establishment(2.03 Ac) Restoration No Credit Utility Poles
f :! L �,'. Utility Easement(100') Preservation-no credit 0 ReachBreaks
\ —
■ ; �= ".•' r Kings Mountain Water Easement(-20') Non-Project Stream
t ` /• \ Proposed BMP Utility Lines
�� 'r;',• *
hi °!► ry 0 J 1 1� 7.i.,...
q'. ' Yi iceerr "; .
i
�� �'(8 - � r , �fir. �' � i _ ! 2
ei` •P • A1 3- - T7,.,
Ativ
\.........---
..... A.
4),
N.
\ '
4 \ 1 1
0 '"6-44}fir--''' , ,L., '' '-'- -7;.w'14,....--'. ' //I,/ ..,-,-,,,e -A.,
ram- ,, �'- ��,( ; r! t \ \ ' 4y / �.___ .: „,„, i, Wr e ?). t ! '' �';� 4 t✓ - ` r
i s� _el • "• �� , e` rl 4 ~ "0 J�)P�4 '/.�+ .•
ry�,,�, ` 0 rc� �I ,, i ..p '` „- + "ifs,
/ V 1 •: , i
,i
,., ,
..,. : . :_
. -,.....:,;-=.,- \
, ______...-
-,"
, , . L-1------..\\ i' ( ...::: :-:-_, :'''''',. . '-''. :-,•••
•
' � 4 -,• — . • ; / . - ri trefork Cr4e - '" ._`— -- :
: i/ .. / Ghoa1339.o
-�. - S t- - (-'_ f-x far _ Yu-.- ..' .,',i _ 4' Y ii - .1 / 'r A a.
1
f c 1 -_. »2*-bc f �r ��� m'. +. s ���r 0. ,{'.: s.�o� -
_ -fir 11/ \ 7./ Remove R ,r.
J � i
1 \ Existing Pond d. - °` o
•
f 'r+ GAB ^+�',,i I '7.
.. ' 11 . . '.. r �1f Hem C ' Z 40
e • 11Lam-. Y , +i ' :___: ��. r
' '. { �,.. �- _
K .4 r 1 _ y „ . �` Bridgefork Creek
she =
� �� � '� `
..0-'
.,mot
•
ti } ima f•!• • ..I r--' 4 �-��♦ - Gam.. _ - ,., ,
82B - --�� �-ice'-'►• _ " - • .•_ �4L•�—'��- -... - .r- �•J�/f� .i S y ? \
1 __-----\ . - - _,__,„L±-..•
_ __ ., . 4,, „..., ,, ,..
, .. .4 .
. . .. ,
\ _.-1-"" _____ _ .I -- . _...,•'- 0 t
.f-1,97-Aioria-7.:!• •• ,,)f ':..- --:,..\\, . \: ..., . . • 1:. 7-,....- . 4.. 4 0 ._.........,,-- ICOST.f't
Figure 6 Concept Map
W I L D L A N D S Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 400 Feetke,
BroadRiver Basin 03050105
Cleveland County, NC

•
_ _ , • 4 ''I
4 . : , •.. „ ...,
, ..,
. 4., . ...,,,,... .....-
4.6' 1 , •1 :- i • - - • .
• * .i 1.4 '• . • et
1... , ,
e•r . _ .1„.
- •-!?A' )L • ''.; '
PI
/
...,f. ..
v. . 4.- r, • .. -I 111;
14. '' • -11 . ,J , Si
41
- '-- -...' L :.•.,
• ,, j ■
. ! .
- -- '
.,_. '-'4• r ., .
--*-4-- '''•••- 3 r lr 4
r A.....)i tt., 1 • - 4m, . .., _.,* i
- 1' -iitdowS •
' .J•t•''' - f, •
4. --r .• ir ft
, .,..
.'IL (1,. 4 . . - - - .-- • )
. -• II
4.I tir , r•-- . 4%." ' . •
I4
_. . • , dir 4.. .• .' - • 1— . _
"..11..1‘.. .,ttL11(,(4-• *:... lit-a. 0 ft A .4. ,-
A Inc. 4,, . IF„r144riel • • . Air .,
VI.
,. r. A 114 if ti.. , i .„. , .0. •IP.Lorttra .4 7.4116' ' .,.. .m . .
-'• • - 4 er ;-7; , .,1,'4,, .. :*, .•-•,.‘ •,. V V,‘....,. -- . •
.) .` _ c,-,RA4• , :. .,., 16, „,,,l , . _
•
%.W::t iq.. li 0 4 p..A • ....',...7;:i 4,..ht T. '..1.,. , r i; ..% , ,d,—,,Hy: ...., :
:11 i•4. 1 1v1.1 •,.4; ',i. ,141;','L'. X 41. -i '.: ,1 11.4t.,-- '.••• *1:r.r t m
s- • .
. ' ,1 ••r7
"i‘ '1, .0.; e.%f'-i . -1 '• 1 • • 11 •4i iF.V.
- ' ' r-'' 1' - r2L.` %1 747:i ''it • . ::: ' 1 '1,,'
. ... ,
,• t.
• A
# f
ibe ,
, 4 ''‘. ., .d.... ' .L0 .' . or ..•• • ' ,
' 1 ' • 0 le pi N - -' -)1.41. tiA
- 1
-• .. -. •-•r• ., .4.4.. f , .. -
• . ..
O. , , 0 A , , •
. '. • k . .
. .
.- -
ifs ' ''. .. . ri• .t. lib i
,., A1 ,' • . ...,1t, 4., .- -
_
.. . ..
.
-...„. ••,'. ,
.. _
.... .... . .. , . 1
'114.4r''.-' L IS. :L 4 : " :.44- . . #0 ''. - • _
' .:•,.• • ill' ':. IL ,:r% • .-.-; .p .0 tr' ., '0111. 0 g . . .•' -
• • d. --. II, .1... i,A .."" _APB
' h ._ -..1' cit. , . ., •:C'' iid ' • 1 •••
s
4AL.571pi. - ' I — . 401 - 'f • - /Li
§Ii
.)li
.-a \ Ii. Ai 1 - • oir
a..
.." 1 le , • --.."' la 3 4,i it
. ...' •
-- LtrAirr ••••' • .4 • •
le.* . - •
_ ,.,- . ... .... •-• ... .
k • -. -i'''A".
41.14 .. • -' • E. _ ,- 46
' _ . - N ' •
_ .- -— ,;,.....?i.,...,.•:.... i . . .4;
ir
J-- . IS i • ' II i , - ..- - "*- .
_Aiiiig- op"- .., . I.• , - _ ..•,.•._
4r, i l''" IA.'*4.6 4.ilerfsat l''
. . . . • - . ...a.. 4 - • a • . I,jk -111, ..: p. IIP - ?I..:-..
A " /• . . A' . " • -11 ,d0 -
,i •• • • .....i
. .
.. _ P' . • .
.....,
) i %-- el ••Nol''''.- .i-1-..•• -
441.1.- ' .- -'' -. , , , • m..'. •
••• ..- ,44, ,
0 •. •• ••••1'...-' -.-- \ '°I;. ' .
- A -3
r 4,. ... ...
_--
lir '
-
YEAR: 2016 - ,
NOLIIRY#:5986708.5
i N '. • _.. ., i .. P fA..,ri
•
' 1
\ I V.• i
CE DR IT 1 •
i =500' % • . i
• .._.41

, ‘......... ta...4,1 . '." -5.- ' . ..ii•{4- ' .... !gip_ .,, _ ,/ •
.5,'.'•vc.,,F.( .' '....' .1.45t, ,,`24 f•• .-. -..'..
. o, ,,.....,,•,1...... .•c•x.i .w,i,It ..; ta••,,,...:.7:!,..,...t?se-.7.,,14.?,A... ' •617 ..'..:k4 --,- •I .4 ''
.,4.
. .,., sv.wii If c P..0......0 vt•AF.„,-.1....,.., .,y ,4:vi, ),It.s.. .1 • . •''
6 Ipi.
•:.• i.•
:?..•tplI.‘ .1) '14'''Tf.ti"SI,a.F .1aP NkOkS 9`", .).Oi'.-_,•ji tg• , ..e•
:1:-,-,1). sit:.4' ,144.e.',7 V......1-1.,,. ,. ..,,...i.r.,....,...,...;..,,. ,:: :.,1z.,56. i.s4:11.41,.. t,. ..t). .",-.;%0., di . , .- •41:,5
' ct'411 - .1, N, 14. 'ioaeN , • .4; V-t• , • • •. 7'1: .iiiii4 ti ' •• ..1:1.
• •
r,q. • 1 "..
...' A' ,. .. 4. a f • iliod.r „4, *
•INT:.Z. •0- ....
•
ig di
, ..4td•t4 di I. •1.1%414... % .3.4.1
14,
s'111, . ... 41,55,74%.,to,a .•i,..; .•4,-
• ,F. h 01:. ,f.,,44 •. ,.t. 4. .
2/ ....ir, .t,
. ,..V.$4 'cil,'t T•41keie'S..;".(Vr'
'-..- ‘i• ,k .....!':V1- .• ' i't,. ..•.. •,,,,,4•;•,,i: .. . 0.
., , .1 .4 . 1..„.f
"'''' • . t.- lie :11 .%:,':itY'..??ig.1,4.1.'i •
•
f,i • '.$•pt•LI: 1;•.AL ,
4,e •-r -, :4i, - .c.$ •
. ..,t Jr. d.•: I
Z. )u.•..:4 4 i fck 1 .11‘; • -I.• ,
' . •el. Of L'' .4- Ilb. a.
.' 't .'..,.:„.Ai %."1 ,.1 t-3, ..:4‘.4- t. : ,...,. v.)
4 - -1.1?(....• -- . •••? . -•Ii,
'%Nt , 1 -.. . ,.4. 4-..P i .
.. " .$ a t A. • • le•V..i.•41. •. 4. T a., • *
. it. . 'a a.... 46• r • . - •
..744-It.“*.' ...1%•tct_--
, ?
' ' •• % .q• I v •••• .••Ok..3' . • '11, ,.. )= .% 1': • ( " •' ' ' - -0 411. 47,4,1 - - : '. -: l " ..•-• ..,
,4.‘ 4 ..0.,:t;k4. 1 ' i - ...,.. •••••IR .. VII%A.... •••• )t...ilt OF Ct.:, At , ..? ... J• -.,.),•.• 1'1 , l'.i.,4••,...",,i'4-,',..ty,_1 ., .:' '. • : 1-t." "., --.)
al, . 'La,.
,Le..„... , •••ix-o.. ....,,, i• •• .1. •.flimr‘ IPA 4. -.- V*41 -: l' --".:.•.‘oi`44. •L • t • d ih....):
'•
..:4 '..,..01.441 • _ „- -4'..v 'el '' • .- •iti a
...p4 •, . . d'e • ,, ,1.4 I. :.10 la., , .
1..:-... •:,:,k,c,g,4-,..,.,•:t.I'Nfriit.6....?,: : OS."...irbTa..0.,--Ei
. _yr4-,I "illr'•.;%.,.4. .. ••I'..4171:"e'r:. '''''.i4'
•'d,4''46.. 'it ,.
•
• w
r:...",....el % mi. I.i ...1(:. lk i tt4 : "4 aq • •4 '%. . r 4 ..
...
•...•Pi 0.it.•..• ....%. , •4,.. , • •
.1.• 7- 3‘,... ' 4 '
14. 1,,P:. • . 7',./ iilLfr --1 J,M..114
it
%yeti`.iti•...Z.,s,. e 't ,;k! 4.0...•.. ..4 ,stkOr .')
.. .%),.1XPIL.kill l& ' a. qty 'd.'j.4: -, -,4_,.,.at'1-•---•.i-i `If q.1.1 )1
• '-• Ck•41F. Ili ., • •
VI •h-14 1.,%sl.,t'1:iL81,k4.44 II' / /..1- t'. 5(.1%;* .. 7'.A'•' ,I 1 f?3/4. .cei•
.. .
• i 2 .. \ 0. i:.. t .. 4t.44 v-0- ,_.
.
ir.,. ......,ii .4,, .„,(10.‘7 • - ,w. . .
• /tir• .i ' •e • el6 . ei :21kjil lip• • ,.LA;;•it't• •' at r..
"it;c1:t•, 1C,1•14 .i. ''' IP
V.4)..../vit.,tild.'.. :Zit..:41,01, ; A t ...•N:le:. .-rc -.10,f,,4i.k .V.
\I
.., .
t ,A, •••. 1. ,ji. ., ' ,,/,',• , c ,,
1P43i9.'.. if 5 .i'k•f \ *: . !,- ' i'. A, '• 4' ' ''# ' ' 4t '' '14;'. 5
It .i...1-IP ,-%V.. A IL.r.k 0-'.. '1' ..• el:. 4':• • •••--1' 7" ...p a ' ';' . ' .d. .
. •, tl ...(*.ti.4,4.4‘flifi 1 •. .it .';1', ..::1 e'V-41,..r, 4.'t 4 4'1.?.VA'Ili N ir • l' :''' illiel:11111
''.14..4•1 te.'.1 ';..Z 't11$ ;;): 1:41.' At k7tk. ' ,1, r• ( "'t• • 4- ' •- ii. 71.
\ .:•■ ' 4. . Ir..V,d 1,4287'-' if -.ill,:/3,.,. ... , . .i! I../ . '-‘`. • •
' i s- , •• • Ii,7 Ili - .r' )
• 1 ' 1- PI '' IP- 1 L IL ,-.14'.` k '-'fr • '' A-A Iii
,,-" ‘p ,;it.4 - .:- .. ".'",i - .- . ; i ' . % '4" . 714,, • -- .' - . • id
' •,r. ' 49-r. . • i.• ;,.. J . i.d.1.41,.. . • I.
0,. ),.. •,• . • ' 1 ' .10 t. ; r‘ • ,)'t:)k. '..,' .•4. m
' , .•• . t t • 44., * -:
• .., 3,, ,1.1.,t; A1/4 •. .1[131 1.•`• • 1..4 • I:...k:. 4., 4-14 II • • '-.),/.... ., ,'.1..A.
'? ' • ' . VI, a' ""-)171.
•4•C„ i :1, iitiff::,.. • „ s„..,14 ... , . ia.d,..,..,.4,1%,...i.:it...540'filtkr.1.
, '1 4ii elt,i',•' .4. . •Li,
r,,, ,...-.(i-,..•.,IN -...X or.J. .,. ..
. „A 0,...%II- ipt.t•• ,•E 4/.. - • ;
i•4 C i d '.
' t 01. -,v
_,- ft•LIA*1,N.:4.r,i,_N' - ---C .. ' ..sillie ,i'stt'e - Y.."11'--' t . •
•194..t.''' • 1 • •
Illi•4 ‘• ' ' !..41)4§,•:'F.1;. eVilir, ..• 4 40tr4 4- "%t`ki.• 4.•. lek,-.'f,„,-;_I- ... Ai 4,e ,vit.%t•tk'At: .41 A.z.n ._
i....." lk t•i• - A -"," .):- ;7'.,14.•.,t(i; -1 ( c V .ty '1' Ift`e, .flt '•el.i;:t01.4 WA•lf:4111-1- ----
.f•,4. ,..... . ,p , , - li.„, .. 4 le,t.\ 1 :7t, . : CL... -4 i "'.., ' . Iiiit 0.,tit..,.. .i%11,*.• _------
„,..
A ' c-.tt• .d• .,41,‘ -7 .It 0 ill. •Ty 1'
. 1 ,• ‘ _.). i -,
_ , , irdir.I. .,0 . ,. •, 11%. -•,0 p. . .. ..,./._, .44.,t,,,,, _-
'• 41 :-;,,• '. -ft, - l• '4' 74. ,/,;A 4J V,V _
• • . .: .;• - '• - •11. 1 : g...-,-•
_ ......-
to, - k 4 , - f•kji:ft• .._1 -'" foi A' '
It lti FA
wit 0,0...r...... ,•- -
, mi.„_ -. t -•.) . • . .. fit. , ./.. ,r• '••:,ti-' ...1,-
' ',.. "..:4.. •....,.• 'lit+ t .'4 „.-_--•-'•-e---' . • '._ fr.•-• }
.' . .7 V' 1 ( " . '' ' -- _-•
.....„.,
, •-• . #, "S, .t Ariri, i,.. ...•-i..ci .1. _ . 1114
• i ... , .
.•. - N -... • _-.:, -. -x
t..1 e.. - ) ..m. ..... ._.. _ ii - ,..„,,, 6,..*:,,-....-..,.:......, ... .
• ..‘1,.4 4.1-4- ii; - ' ------- ---- --------------- ii,-Jo -• . ' -.• - . •...,
-- „Fr-- - . .... - •• ,i Li- -,--- _.i.----
•••• .
f el k . tint r -it,,...7- • • •ii-tir..,•'•' ' ----- 4.••A. •
iirlitik
'1 C. ' • .'4 , .rg % vit-.1. 'ilb• :, ..-'''...: ,k,a11:' - - - • -
411kkirp, i
...•-• . . ..
. ,.-.
,•■ -07 -
•4 . P .,.,Is .
•7.1 '4. •
rif ' 1.;V•I', 'q ..4---ei 4: 1- ....-- -- -, _ _ ,-, .t„..i.o...-\: -
_ jr.„, •, gi . J.O•
• •.,'••• .al.- ••- a
.-- ,._,.;:i uo •. ,•ig.i..;,, , . . . . . ;1 i I • .)...;.• P 1 g
.1,',1! • --C!;k. VI,.: - ' ' ‘01461.•
i t'•-4;4 y• 44,0 !"..-
441;;:pp.r:A; f.1'4(i' 43SW.I.t -411°.. ....• .4' .Orb, : • .' I's • , i 'i f.'1. . ... I,‘T :.•
• •• • 1, i... . ' . ! 1 .
Zg 1..4,:,)l'' '''' ..LcW 41. • - ,,,,,LC.i. ,.4., ,-° . .& • • • -, 0..1.
4 lit•.1 glj4.'". ..0. 41(b • , ...4.. ii. . ..%.
•
7t . '' •... .
4. •
1:. .i•je'' .. . ...- 4e4.l:r#1. 1 ; ••• .•
.1.
e... ,,iii. _, .. .. 41f 7, .- , , . . .. .-,---,_,--- _AdiCr ' .1•/.! 'L . „
AI • ,X •`' i • Ole
. * •'i••-* Iv-I At%:• • L 1 itifii.". . 11
_ • ...' ..., -I r Li:. '(' 1 t•-'• - •L b •••.*•741:2, . i
4, .1 • ._.%1P*40 • Aik- '1•S• .
, ..,40,411- *,. ,t4pfoist ;•
* ..tt :,_
.• •/ .
INOLPRY#:5986708.5
i N r/- •-• 311.11(,4,4. - ,
YEAR: 2012
.. ,.. .
CE DR
=500'

. ./A"It ilirr._
Y y f r 1.
-;
gi
v L_ •
1-"L''''''''' . ••••+^-- .
a ,
r
.r. r F /
r
J , ■ • .
�i i
..
,
fes. .. . .._ ..=:, . I
y 4
cp
ma ,-�+ 1
- _ LI .i A.:,:TO r {
I NQ L14 RY#:5986708.5 r {
ems-'`- '•
j
YEAR: 2009
=500' EDR • • -F
/t a •

. 1,:.....10, •
• _:t'il,.;4-k-/. •
, :til'•!1"
. • 44i.. • .
. .
•-.. -' 'Y''-trftlik, . • .-. .. •-...--. ilik ..:,,tif11,%.'.
Jo '-.:...,:::,-,.--/. .,;-.,r,- ,:, .„ - . -t. .. ...,..., ,L,-.. ....• i
.. .'"lt
eq:.-.:;.....:-.:'4:-...:::,;.....•_.,....,,,.a„../. ,4;, -4'
' • r.4.441, r . . .
. ...• : ,..„. ,...,. . • •• .
• is. ti, 3, :,k,r1:.„ . ., , ..
.- - : .-:...-?,iiii-...• ••.--::1-,...1i....... , . ..d.7.4. .1-_,„ .
. .
'1';,iiii ., 7 i'AP : • -1.
, .. :t.1 I 0. , . .e... .•
. . . ... .... _..
, . '7 z A r:".• '...0.4 -—.........
4.... ,
..-. .
,,,....'"<" .'411111/ '...\ .....-4
....- . ,- , if
. ,
/... l'•
.‘ . .. .
. . ,
. ,
.......,.. ;y ...x ' ' a. .. e ;pi.
' A 4
-- '
•...„.. _
.11*"„y •a '2. •.a.., %--;..•- i...*'•
4 i h
• , '.'. •.. :•.•,.., \
l . ".0l,d 01.......-• 1 itiff
. "'. ..„. -....
a. ' A * l'•
/1,' . ".Ili ' i P...•,, NI,. ..
. T'P.-•
.. to 4' I
-i. .
•-•
i 4." , ... -
• . ....
• ....vrt . . -ed..
.. .
..4 ,
: a -
. ..._ ..
.1.: a - _ -- :44_19:. ,s -
'.. - •. -•0)/P'•. ' '4_•
,• . .... ... .
. . .V. . , •. . . ... . . ... _. _ .
•
4,I iikli.
......
• - . ilk
/
.)m ..' :. . 4. ._..1..
, . 4 ‘e• now , foi% - ' "'-r•-• ' Ile
. -1.• .. '4 • '• . -....„.. • , • ,--...,
. ... -
., .• --...
.., . , {v......:. ii....
:.dei Ai. . .. '34,,:Y" .,,. I itr.- ••.'
liklb Ili •
, •• •OF•11•. -•.' '; -,•.r.'. . ' , ; .--- ,. :".'••.--r --,-L.'v,•! •1-1454.-!•'-'-.40•;.•
- . -
. .. .
.-.•••• •
••,•". • P
•
. ..:
iiilid. 1 _ . _ ..
' - ' ....r1
54,- . . .1.„„, - . - ,.. 4,- ; - - ..e.,,,.. • .. ,.. . ,... .
4i :....,... .... ,,..,:;_ . , .., kr cd.'.: 4
e . 4 7.1••••.1:TA ------- -
"I• , •, • -2*•
' ..- - 1, - .- ' • • 40 ..0 ...-...•--......•-....
.• %e • !••''•. - ,:' a-%.••..A„-•..''
-t t,vi,,•t o-..-I.
..'•1•••- - •-.‘•--'
.'"--------:-4- • .-- .-•- • .
-.•.0
,
At 4 . r . -- -Pt- -
...
.t•.
-I..-,-•.-..
: .
'
• ,...f-s".:.•--..- ...-.• -- •
-
....,--.. _;-iit.-••• 41 • ''
;_....,-
-.1.... -
•• A• ,
. ... .
„...-• •"•
„ .
, _,-.'f-'•-•'-• . •
.... ..
.--- , . • .
• .....---:. 411 r- 7.‘ .‘"•
--....--
_.. ,,..
• ' 3.17-'•
4044 We'
l' k ••••-- ., .1
c...... ••,,
RED ' lk ' .... .
•...,
. i•. ' it. - 1 -qr
Am • or
..mo, ,.:
. •
, - .• ... .
.p ,- . .. . . .....„.
INQUIRY#:5986708.5 N . .
....... v ....
..
YEAR: 2006 sz, ,..
... _L
• 1
• -
C • . 1. . ; ...•
I =500' E DR '

i 4 ii $ ,0
`� , "-
. .
f _ ,. .
,. 7A, - I ', r „.,.t. pit. .. F�,? fir
r400' .
•
Y .
.,
: .
• ,1 .,..hir - 4r..• !, '-.•. ,
iiiik. # : . .,:., . ..
•
40 ,,, _.,..
I
t • .. 1 r.f ,
4111 I ki ■ t •
�i. yf
414.
ry l
'•-• _ k
It. , . , •
I r
ti
,Il
11 14 0A, .
I
• .
•
_1 ._. sIt +#
r
J.
1
M- • • I. . ;
.• 4 ••#:. il1,0,. ,,, .. .
. ..
-
tr-. I ., •
•
•
' 1
i
1
INQUIRY#:5986708.5
i N
YEAR: 1983 ''
=500' EDR "r
la

1
11
t
`_ i .x^uY: °ra ' tip... ,.1 S'.' F "•�:.'; •.i -••.?..::;tin
- ....,..- ,T : 7,1 - .; ......,..„:. . .. - ,..1/4,-.-%-, .. • . ,
I- :yr• ar?. ,. (Fr• • ..:.
Y•
.,\-4.7,.... ..,,, /.....://r-t'. .:::.F•r. .r.a...0;.
1.
e, ,R -..,'7.*: " .. .• ,'.tee.. ., y ~' p • _
.� �, Sti, 'i} f
' r•g i '....* ......., • P iii$
•
we
•
•
e�` a. r t•
'4` p
. 4 r'e .,1... x; ^A ,ram+. . :j,•
r• i.
•-.e:s•,r4-1
sue ,- ,._yam
-y rye,,tiL y_n...•
R
. + — • "
bi.:
;'a
;..
•
L N ,-.r.
YEAR 1964 j� :. :
=500' . .

. ,
•
- - J :
•
i ..."
d . •
.
- '
4 . ffir I
#
-
'11
di
stra
644441 ...rie _ i
fill .
..-
'
,
+I. ff
.. - • i
4.. . air e
dir i
... . .
. .
...
'(A1- 1.111. hg.- )141 ' . • ._.
,
IP
.„. . .It
../
ili
6 . 4111 a 1
N. .—V t .1
111 .411
i f p
0 .
r i • 4 Id C '
•
k ..,
, . L
1 A 41 ki,
.•- ...i. .
i
,F . I .
. F m.
ti144
. * 09411 glhIS )141‘ .
IF i,4 1
1. Ipl s
# IR
k 41'
1 . . I •
oi..,
.•
flifr....
49.1....°-
.. -wrap
N
........1.411 ..........00.0„,\I i • - _4.4.—....—
— 4.
i• • e__.
•
pf
i •
INQUIRY#:5986708.5 .. The
i N ir il k • I _
„ I t
YEAR: 1961
k
411,..101I 11"
Jp.
=500' 'EDR
.

' , ! , P ~
_ 0. . / � . ' , ypt��• • .
- - - ' .49
k
\ 1 . / .
r . / . - , y %
. - . \ IP / .
_ ` .. .. . 4
4' 1
.
. C f f .
. . . _ it t' » . .•
•
\ , . . «-ft 01:97121.
• ! 91.^ � %mik
. . It . �` : ., 4
441.
.p• .
. _ ... -• -
- ' . . ,
«
, \
■ A..0 \ � \
f
..,/ ,
•
41§Ik4ii-V| . yr.. - , . . ./ \
1 • .
ja6 - » k f , 1 � •k i(
. / `, 9 -•
� ' /
' -
��.
PP.
. - 4 -Ili , . �
+ z • . '
OP' � , :
� � •I
` � � ^ i ���\
�
f! '
, '
.
- - _ - { .
, . ,. & .
r %
. • -
_ ,
. • h _
» , - ' - » '
" : .. , ` . - A .
[ i 0 . 4es ell
. . :LP
f
A .t 44 V -
-
. Z `
„4- 4- - f. � - aro . p
. .
k \ ....PIN f . . 2 Al. --� . . '. _
`
atliP
. , ! - -
`
- . � ' i
INQUIRY¢5986708.5 . • t 'P
YEAR: 1950 i - ` a a. , . '` 4
CEDR • ilk . . ..
1 =me . . .

r + • • ram-
•
' . ... A'%
.,,... . 1°. 1 II —Pr.
Nits F rr —1 45, • It
I I'
y {
.. )) 1 ' '' 4 . _.
•
•
tIly I -'
1 .. 6 fry" ' 1111-.':
,-.- 7-1 j.
y• - � f t91
. . r ( /I.' -i. (/
{
1 I # '-
I I. l f ' i
- r s' '+, e
•
' 4 - - -
4111101,\. . . X Ti--.' .m,- ., , _ r
•
iiiiiiiir ..
fill r
.r
NIL ,
..,Att11111111111111111-4." 1 r ., r.11 . rit 1 fr.. . IN-. k -111.... . Ir.% .
1
: a ,' t
ji. RN
a.
Iiii.
h.
iiii
ir
L ' rr.
i 41, 10
Al
- I y . . I.8
}
•
I µ
�'it ON e 4. ... - ;• .
... - _. . i
art
I
- ,1 r $ . 0
..L , 111.1
_ ,. ....,..-4. •-• .. •4 'iel e
. is
I NQ L14 RY#:5986708.5i N �,
YEAR: 1938 Y P}
t
=500' EDR r .. Y %*a

aa
5
\ \
{� rrrrCS
1
� p.
a lv n r7 w en ra•ri rr:at'a rl Ml,o M y a o IA Pr Ie, •,
� •I i•F - F 5 1
a.
a g g , [' '''rl X \V '
= i T ?' m
L tE 4
c O ,1
Y A5 r' a
m ^v
-i E,07'
� �r �� r fl.. i .hen. ■ 'i6� 1
v E i t �d I r 0 0 r I�0 0 N N l T O O G O
- 2€ m . Y LL..
J ! C
d"'j.
jU
r Z0000aao oorPo n�oob� .1
C urn'
m>
d +.1 mw
E }
ii _ 3 E�.
r
m fi
"0 m E ' n
n m
— c4} Ib It l m " e d 4 a Y
n . , gE_; S: os c — va I
�C� s t S H B E gl
14 �' a °? : . .31 g $ o � o o Y 4 s 1 2
S � .= nicc$ 2 a.:20.! .o c gmmar,2 .Y, m `m €11
A •`1 .i v__ e c c ; g.2 m m w a o c g = Ilk
ti4 .. c : Ear 22-1,22 S8man o 2 vS m—" m a n ma c _ '-
U $ Ocn �A tns L� c o= E cn O i Q cs • e e
n w
.� n �eBLEy m�paa 9 =i a` g34'i w mK. 3.72odyF 3{ itt it
D W 1-�i 2 Q.-{Y rl R Yi®i. e e ram; s N 1^J Q N m F Li*$g IY IY 44[4Y N 54 Z N
2. F
`' �,- C- O rj bi qt vt'; 1.i•Q I.4• I.1 PJ O..0,1! G o el el b fO .. 2
•
. . ■ I Y .
ri
r�
`, x I T Y
J +f1 ! 111a;
3 d e.3 a M N 19 N N M!M Al r it N i[Y O-.- r r.., _+"{I Y 4�
3 3 s a a kkkffff
Y
J
c m
p
T . r, ,
I CaT
se
-- m r r r• r r r-r iw, b n N N r ID b.0 kin X
_j r!- O r r O P r ....
?�
L] C
CC • ■
z a
C , 6 m a a 9 a a a a 9 9 C. a o r 00 ..d7 a R a a O a S -
a Y V El a g-
•ri
F •
E3.
w
E' ti I--
V.
u I n a-
C e " - €
nn
F.
C 14 m
_
I.
A L mO
OpR N E 4 V 3 w 0 o O II m y 1 j
L ~ ;. T C 4 • E C E § D E y
re � L. €R oo cE>eao a ug -m $ 2iSa012 c '1,-
r-- x a c m I tE is g. Ie • c n .'
1 3
Lm r $O a m2� —c m a g C a • ff s m
p ,) Iq€ aY.aouwissofoBa Eviag !c& s a2 -
U + en ga fao = my Kv -a Ewaam11n •_ lm -
..a C § a " m m _ c a 32n o n 3'N N sN € u
1w fi $® aoe3t.5z i _ .0om.0rc2. ._o v
O WFyh a ,4 4llbti9 iar• m' Vr4 UmmM i22 *oN

o —
r if
._I 9¢J v) n ai ri V7 'm `rl ri o'��' 0 a:rl PI,e-n ur In
Cti co 1_
Y
m y
c z «� f / } I a f� I
a v 0 ! r r re
4 m 6 i 0'N N IY•``�17 N 1�^�IY r A•-' .N �+3 n M L
A O YG 6 O y ' r - 1._I I `• R.
a J V 4 Td I y
1 J
1
'' •`I
I � s
oe I Y1yI I . , , O.
4 ..l .Y s r _�i�._ _ r'9 1O b� M tY r n pn 10 ■ '
4 a. ca L., V Tl =i '
A : la - r
G& ■ i -
g E G n �f E
sa
T� ■1 6 E .. 0 0 0 0 0 0-0 Co o 0 ,0 O�' o o n nl 0 101O 0
a >: R V .a I I C O . I _
O d f} ip W . - 1 , i,
{■.
a n S a
a •
€ -y ' I m 9
c $ gg ; E a;r
C I 31-tDd - ! ID- - Icy- a » ▪ 5r
m
E p 3jn g,z a -5 5 g ■ 1 Q't i' i E ipy�1
3 '` 't °agRm ZGS
�e 6 ° er ii ¢ n
VJ (S oa@au a ag
ma3m -0 c—c:5 n
3 NL c @ a a . 1m 3anE
s
g II
s E.li o ca e a s w s a. G c � O p: .4 q n= . ErI I
c4a�.. No 2 = 1m N •,4 aEg c1Y.
ti � el..
C : H . � 4s. g3IZ . 3to 0 . . t[,t_ 1
•
G W Fv`rx 4= t�ri srimr mm r:ci,. � iJ,- nM ,nnnn Z Y}
ky I
v
�l a7 0 0'r Yn n 0 n in .ae
CI I - m
t
v n +a fr i
a to IIiIIHII
NrF - - n-,r r r-�
s Vi 11
• 1 .
it O
ar j 1
1
V Pf nI r N.O 10 b ■• 7
ct r ¢o d0007 >
1 1 k
C irk:: ■o
i
.ti . `
iiii
Di j
P ' "
- `.- - ..
I M1.
m
V
4, DID t� 1. .41.- ` g 1�
• b:--c E 3g 'fir' oIH e - s �'� 4,-
L ; m m _ A .. p 9 M i S o t_n s
c, �, '
3 o ' .b , a m n m 9 a C R 8 g Q,
m O{F o i oc. ¢23 3--a
4 �:� t `a- m 1+' o50 m ti cva r,- aa n
Z \ .. 'ana o = .1� E - o . '=c '- m oBE n'OR 2i i';_e3,
W FML 4- vn �- moi-� s� €.7 nnno3 g n•R 2 VJ
1
F

-aI TL
.N Cc•
o ! Pl M al P N P _,.,I� T
o� � o o�i Pi ,1O
'.---) _ W
iffle ram
r n n ^
` E YI y
9 z . rl y o• `
R
�•4•
4 n $ g nN .w N�sr x`1 kdQrr r
`ao + 11
J O tl
co G C
o E iD
eP t-
I _ .V. V ;o C r G 4Lr, N r O O a O
l •
a 4_i . 4 VVV a
€I! b LL
z. 3 •
p � • a s Z o o a o r a a a a o a o"' o a a s o a o a 0 :'5
m 1 _ a U n
ri
a U .. I
£ a
a
yy _ E
G o
`� a € s
n
6 L316. N
c. Y pg ' a
ife 0. I 9 Eli .. O b
Si i °=z e m Y E c -E o 0 o m `o o 8 m E g
3 _ S 4 2` `ate garo a . IA c�al3 a-. r m E '
�' m u'S `�me �� $mmo }$ N ai� �oo 5 at
A cat `o�'m$m11 ' �`i g 8 s " zu £ 1i1 m
g q 44 il 0.U I Q a .0`it _g Z / k i 3 W Q cR m iL(C `d.2 iL 6 G i 2 I
O III 1-rgg. Qr 01 a$ 46 mrm v:S; r1..ai 0.rt-n - Uci.Unna+ N gig ro &Z al
r a I J I I
- . ' * -. 1413 Q.32 a�Mi M fl C.nv 00of n•an ton
nt 11 7 " 1r$ , .-. r r
i
I ' "
rr I 21
2 r > t
w 7F @ 4 n N N N N H N N T} N M oco
_ _kit N 2,r r
3 J o2 i r y
m
O
• Il lu
_ r`
;Y]m a e0 lei iA N 14 N
r .- r co r �r an o.Q.a o3
I la
In b -
€c I z- 9
'- — e { f� E
g j C E a a a a U o a a o a 4 0 7,g a o Pl'ai o p o Cr O'�
e ♦b p < t Y q
ciL
;Gp d U Q W I eh
4 2
O - g
W I E
d 4 g o
2 {R 4 c 1. v o
E Y IW V A
I} ��I i y
4` N QIJ.
O la § m s 2 . E
C
p \� ..y g-. a -5 a t 11 n °tom m A P n
i i'I I iA a m . £— C 7' Q I a O . 45 O p D II R V 6 n
ri _ 11. gi c m L a o - 9 1 = m a n -2 z E '
r 1 a O q m M a @ v a ` 04 m n -§5 m
u t •a's m t c a m o ; a m e a m sm e.m 5 m= a E
a P d- .0 g.a mj T O 8 m O • "E l .. q
z
id t
w S° °0 is Spa Aa ge' r 2 ! 'a w:T d �J eA Ora ffltii[ 2 wti4 a i m x
a s a w o r N e'' leor n:aicN ,S•a
a lu r a ¢': of da Kilo ri �`a r t7 an gig z m

A
p+ .
e JP
,
xu aI y
Y s O In 0 m f] C.I.vF n M'.N Cl. el 0 .-.i c 0'ei CI r r r r } +
tV C . m y1 LAI J
i
r
a s tp u nN 'N Ny oa rlr n � �fy ar rr.-
J J U 6 4 I +N I¢'r r ll rlr
1.
m
a
�r 1y c w
y v YS i -i •-t Vi N f,f /A 0 , ry r L4 Lc!t4 IO ■ .•
�" Cc i oo flog a� 0000g `_ L,
E ` I '
e
•- i i = E - C.
6 C ■0 Q J d }
> U 0 W •
I.
I
— .94
I E =
.•
e e -ri
E s r- to !$ o m 'L a E E� 'l t
7a a'` ? A � a
m c m
} 6 ¢•n -- m m m m c , N, viS 9 ff z' a t $. mli e e w + , 4
Ik €[� a c C j C g~ O 4 e V 7 ,cm', $ I C a 5I„ a Y c - —
3 Efi ,12mz.5 $.t r' s ac n2 m4 i E i
_ _,$ d$ m 8.? 8 4 'y a F o f , v7la a c o c g 1y� }
G -- Cgs pia:o131 s o $ b p R , ocaa -1� = g LPG
U z 9 6mg. 0_3$ yg� = qa ci @vgs 0 e' L2 ..gi 4 m =t m i-t
# $ r5 s Q a m
3.gw (93,i as oz=gzm�2efag53ommlwaz aIc5 <ggli
Y 0g4 O T 4'1 4 KI W M1 Qt O r[V 4 p N O I g
W �-�i S Q�n q V 16 0![` 06 Oi m L}r �N rt.M LY M LY N Z I V7
- � ~ I
�' U'0m f '
ppmIn.rJ y rO.9 .4h rl T'1O O Ci v.,.
�
e z > > m
1 4 2 f� o
$ .. go. anlv',n nnnnnrr rr jrMCYrrrr . i
Dv $ �+ V a
I 0
I
fl
‘ : ock
V C 0 1
0
a 4 r r n . iq Y7 r C Y7 i0 N �4 ■
s I rr r r o o f r r on nerrr 0000U
e
�' O fi o 0 o a I r (`- E
e E a s 0 o U 0 a o o 00 Iiti3O'p,oro0 0 n
8 ol
a0 oo-w
E E
a I E 1$ o
a k� 4, ae •' m '- e
V [� 1i OI
C u a 3 110 E S
V
Yam., a c i s n� �4y` c v
6 r V_ =v ? -6 o s ■ Z n " C E8
m M o E c F. E 6 3 m a `o`a u q V a n
a $
VS E 2, IX 5 c g$g a n g a 9 c 3 a g S I.
c
' m w. 4 m F. S i a m a w '. N a s m=b _ Q'{'-" 2.9
E
1. 2-S1t 2g o t* 8 m 40� = c
4 o o g n o m ar• a c 'o U} i0 i t w = E
a - Ili m a m a m 2 c c y c_ ! 0 3 a � 0 a,, 3 c! i m 'o
u pn E :Mcame$ g. 8mc�a , LfE °i4 d .m 't TO -11
VEIL m7
a o �, 1.12 !-
'U ��= QN of vi v ro 0o r: �au r1 1 :m r � U ——F. F.n1N n n n n 2 U7

T
1 _
C
TC O.co co ['1 e']i•)[')C}mn6! t9 4rON'''! F oomm 610�A.O a '
�-77
n p C r-
■ 4
�Y] ' e
•
3 i binly n nev�e n�� l ev'6�� __nn r .-r- ��
�s a▪ 56. 0 1 a1111
r a
M �� 2 L � f $ g; y 111
s� a-' a 'fr_ ff VVV { rr `l
Q V C': a o o' 0 O I:,P•O 4 14 v v'�O a. m n . @ o rI
cY Q 444 �, r
d L' w W 1
E 3
° 3 .
.0 L s
� g
ra c r
" 1 i 9•
aNF it
yy TL a 3.1 e .sy _. c e
C
To
.§ m m v a w ..
3 5 ° o m c Im oa,m<<o- c E
Et. S t '� 88 o . m▪ ' s -AT! F - W1v. !§p 45 aoEa A P2 L,9W
661 A 5t6 a o s=v z ar:T a w O w m-.ir rc 4 fv-n 7. .it A 1e
O▪ s F"er£ri Qt:-tiniv o oormaO Co N ai Q h b.-{ mW O s�NO 2 ea
'
Y Y
l 2-
- m to mmmr.viT� ;mo�� oomm�«'9 l
-?' N• ' r
�ti _ _ . . _ ■ I. ei
s }
3 V n h "1 ONN_N N NNNrr NNa14r rrN N -F r,
J l fI
{ .
F.
ti
_- I } o r , inn n.1 Noe In n'inti°
b4 at ee oo Boa 000, ?� •
_ [y. YY I'' 4
■ N
ti3- �J E I a° = N
c WE
4
. g • E E l 0 0 0 ....... 4 ...1... m ,o o•,.0 0 i?
.. a c ■0 6
P s a
o a U Olu - A '
O S CC1,-._
; a a.
0 N I '3U x 132
$3 '
•
Z II = m - • • I 1
f7
3� y
Oct a aEa Augit a ° c.a=Q/ ? cf
C - C .�Qn� g`R5I.'=-3 kk..' >� .5 m9s4z,24 m I E
c pt
Z W S�0 air g 4 a—E 8 3 ° 8R e 3 c F. E C' cli -a O Q a m 4E m
> —p H o► ' ai • r"1+ �41 pp ..Y.re ',b c O s
O W F-�A a n P} Y h m n dI ► lA V r iY M;M M n•N N - Z {�}
fit\

/ \ y
- , , ..:--: oo,\ =m== -
\ „`�\ f
/ . S ' 1 : . . . 1 \
! Iiir ."f �\\~ , ` " ~ `
7 . . . it
.�
t \ -
2 ) _ )�- - -- - \
41 . ,_ )4 - ��:&§ \
\> k} N _) t6.(_
2- L ' z - - i. 2 % 1yE •
N.
: 000 OJOOO\O o \, _IP0 M° fi
7 2 & e!
} , . . k\ ,_ ƒ
11
•
2 - _ _
g O. ii , I $\ 49M id_ � \ 7, ,§ - g\ ji 2«
v — \ƒ[ i I.' . Pc' ■ | |,
� ^ .0.W ;i . -# I:I
2 |. \- o g =k2 )|j )\igz4E ! g}
o . } \{\§k}&k\ hi � �) f§kka ; #,
0 lk `f\•I§{kk -�'�\2Eg . -\V \/Sk\ � - { �
um -iz /2 ; =© � v= . , a | 2m | ;fg �1� 22 � , _
z | 2•; ,6 !!/ ! k ■ ®aa :; a | °-, )a , � - ■ = Eg��; ` --
! g0t. A2al-z§I!!g2!§= wfl •e §2/l75R\{» |m ;
_ : •<J' ' a6�., ,... so.�. Or,@\fq&n■ . a

BK 1809 PG 1268-1271 14 DOC*22337228 BK 1809 PG 1269 DOC#200037228
This DDcumonl eRecorded: 03I174202D 111.32:33 AM
Fee.$26 CO Tax:30.00
Cleveland County,Nu&Carolina
Betsy S Hsrnage,RegIsfarof Deeds
BUYER: SEEEER:
Redhtn OS ENGINEERING,INC,a North Carolina DENNIS CRAIG PATTERSON AND SUSAN
corpe,it n PATTERSON
o
P.
5 awn D.Wilkerson,President ay: �� r'`'��
Denis Craig Patterson
Date: t/114 f tiou7
Dale_ ,
Susan atterwn
RECORDING REQUESTED aY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIETO; JJ ey
One!_ Q�t Giti�
Wrldlands Englpeenng,Inr_
1530 South Mint Stfeel,Suite 101
Chanptter NC J9203
Altentton'lee Knight Ceffely
SPACEAWOdE INNS ONE FOR RECORDER'S USE
MEMORANDUM OS OPIOON
moo Memorandum or Option(this"Memorandumel Is between Dennis Craig Patterson and
Susyr Patterson I'Seller),and WRdlandk Err/IneerinE,Inc,a Numb Carolina Corporation rained')
rhos memorandum Will become effective when all parties have signed it- The date of this
Memorandum will he the date this Memorandum is sgned by the as/party to eign is
Seller does hereby glue and grant II Buyer the right and dpdpn to purchase a conkanteDan
easoment ono portlon of two parcels or mat preyery numprrs.d,in titet,of eplrroodmately Sf 06 iota.
located ail Patterson Road In Rings Mountain,Cleveland County,Norin Carnlna,mourned in that countses
Regisrer o'DDeeds al Ronk 1314,Page 1792 and Deed Rook 17111.Page 1059(She`Rawly')
Thrs option expires March 2E,7023 and the dosing shall affair no at before the date that Is 30
days atter the option expiration.
AA The provisions set forth In an Option Agreement between the parties With an effeitNe date of
'ryl I` ,2020 ere hereby Intarpotarrd in Inks memorandum.
Each party Ir Signing this rnempfandum on the date slated nalow that pany'ssrtenatti .
IIn a woolttad
by"alleluias
engine.tong ysnc-' n
and ne urea of me auhelxc.r Aerrratene.rce:he770lerilnnrd iyadn�a y`.:os:rtar at Deed._
BK 1809 PG 1270 DOC#200037228 BK 1809 PG 1271 ❑GC#200037228
Mecklenburg County,North Carolina C IQ11dlZN0 County,North Cardllna
t[edify that Shawn D.Wilierson personally appeared before me Shis nay,acknowledging to me that he I lortilt that the Following person personally appeared before me this day.acknowiedging to me that ne
is Preliden t of Witdtarrds Engineering,In.,a Nodal(angina,raeporation ano that he,as President,going or 311e!tract the tangoing document
authoNied to do so,[rented the foregoing on hello II of Wildtands Engineering,Int.
Ch I, , ).S�s�,LLn
Nome of prt,CHlvf
Date: G%-tfC-XX)
Date:03'6 4
�yk��fnr
IOffic�I seal} Grr`c-� tL .'I�S..`A"„"p y'i'
03 OBgk�J, offrcmt SaQnaGNe a/Notary ." e�Ct4 Wlrral5igrwrure o7Nomry
.„01Aier -TAN MM
i�t'1 Qyfp _ _ f0 �' Naralyc primed or typed ndme
;� 4H = Nato printed or tyyrd rtnme
aYlO = / 5 n D BL , i My tammisslan empire;: 034.1 a034
My conenlsslnna%plre><;0 �r� k ND OsGdY`
Jree'Ph
1

BK 1809 PG 1284-1287 1d) DCC#290037227 BK 1809 PG 1265 DOC#200037227
This Document eftecorded: 03/17/2020 11:31:38 AM
Fee$26 DO Ter:80.90
Cleveland County.Rain Caroline
Betsy S Hernage•RegIster of Deeds
BUYER: SliLER:
WILD NOS ENGINEERING,INC,.a Math Car 011oa HAYWARD BULLOCK and NANCY PATIERSWN
cur po ran BULLOCK
Win LI Wilkerson.President Hayward Bullock
Date: j!1 i r7.d l�D Date:f' i_ 'i 1 GD
I + BV. raw
NenLv dttnrnen BIIlIcLY
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORD[)MAIL TO: aate:.3-♦�-..3C'aC• _
W Odtands Engineering.Inc.
1410 South Mini Sorer,Suite l0a
Cha done,NC 28203
Atlentieur Lee Knight Calfer6
SPACEA00VF THIS LINE EGA RECORDER'S USE
MEMORANDUM OF OPTION
The Memorandum of Option{this•Memorandum"}is between ltayaaatd Bullock and Nancy
Patterson Bullock I"Selicr],and WRdtands Engnleerinl,Inc„a North.Carolina corporation l•enyer"t
Thin memorandum will became effective when all parties nave eigneci it. The date of Wit
Memorandum will he the date this Memorandum Is signed Iry the last Harty to sign it.
Seller does hereby the and grant to Buyer the Nghf and option to purchase a cariwtVahhan
easement an a Fortino of a parcel of real property comprised of apprpvletmtely 2,06 acres ItLated at 367
Patterson Will In Kings Mmulbin,Cleveland County,North Carolina,recorded in that county's Register
arieedsa!Bonk HR.Rage a75(the'Preperty'l.
This apron expires on March 26,2013 and the closing shall occur on or Whore the date that 330
dogs after the option expeallon.
zpitrho9 proyislonc set Forth In an Option Agn Bolen between the parties with an clFecuve date of
11✓fI[rx.14 _.2a"!0 are narclty lutorpolated in this memorandum.
Each parry is signing this memorandum an the dare;rated helaHa that party'e signature
•
lii clIttad alectrohtner14
r•Aroll erlatarl tan atar.np inC_^
and itie zeta.ar ere armal xeer pyre Beene n1[nxihe clyyeuiline ocife6y uoSS.tar at vaeds_
BK 1809 PG 1266 DOC#200037227 BK 1809 PG 1267 ❑CC#200037227
Mecxlenburg County,North Carolina f�'_@L.€/grr+i County,Hortn Carolina
I certify that Shawn O.Wilkerson personally appeared Isolate me ml5 day,ammnpwledcing to the lhal he I tertihr that the ft:A:Wing perlen paraenally alydeared define me this day,aglenowtedltlns to ice[hat Ile
Is President al Midlands Engineering,Inc a Worth Carellna corporation and that he,as President,hcitlg or she wood the foregoing document:
euthanred to do so,executed the Foregoing on behalf of Wilda not Engineering.Inc. 1'
/,R L'[1fi 4.,1r d Oc[/2`
7 Nome of principal
Dare:63-rF,-210 Data: 7 1'tic•AS
•
�.�r4 • Sl li iy.r Gfticalsynorllre of Notary
ry` OlirdeSighxure of NlJv lrY 4Ty /`42P
#0 1 A T_ -TAN I RR,7'Ln1 zEHarr i} Ot ARY
r i rmmrsr6 pricked Or typed name
in PU6L4G tg 7ytlmr's minted errtypad name �i1 PUaL1G = My commission expires:C' fI C,7C.j
Tf Cc�� 6
rrFNgU.G�1�.�` Mai emotes: c11 11//aC. .1i l eovip•I rrr?[fiM1'BURG�����
1

Bi{1809 PG 1272-1275(4) DOC#290037229 BK 1809 PG 1273 DOC#200037229
Thin Document eRecorded: 03/17/2O2D 11:33:48 AM
Fee 326 DO Tax:10.90
Cleveland County,Noah Carolina
elsy S Hsrnage,RegIsfer DI Deeds
BUYER: SELLER,
WtUPLANDS ENGINEERING,INC.,a Naelh Carolina BRYAN HEITH DELLINGEit and MARY ELIZABETH
rorpvrarlatl DELLINGER
RT. rD
wn 0.Wilkerson,President t Keith Dellinger
Dim 7 y.l P 1}'0� Dare) ]
fff ii147,_1.'426.14.
RECORONG REQUESTED RV' Mary Elizabeth Oelringer
APO WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Wlidlands Eng•neering,Inc Date: 3•
ta30 Spulh Mint Street,Spite 1DF
charlotte,PC 25203
Attention:Lee 11tlgnt Caffery
SPACE.ABOVE THIS ONE FOR RFCORDER'S LLSE
MEMORANDUM OF OP DON
This Memorandum of Option{this"Memorardami rs between Bryan Nelth Dellinger and Mary
OILoheth Dellinger{"Seller']_and Wildtands Engineering,Irv,a Noah Carolina carpn•atiun l^Buyer"},
This reerrloraodllm will boceme ellectse When all panieS hate signed Ir. The date or this
Memorandum will be the date this Memorandum is signed by the last party Is sign it
Sailer does hereby give and grant ce Boyer the right and option to pprchase a camervalron
paseiinintl an a pa.[Inn of.a panel of real property tern pried of apprwpma[Ny 30.85 acres reared or
Dillon Road in Kings Mountain,Cleveland County,North Carolina,recorded in that county's Register of
Deeds at Book 1E04,Page 577[the"Property").
This optron tipirea An March 2G,2023 and Me closing shall ecnvr on or botar!the date this Is30
days after the option crprrahnn.
Th g pro114is+ona set tall,inan Optino lgreement between the patties with an effective date of
Y ■ ^2030 dre hereby.Incorporated sn Phis memorandum.
Each party is signing this trremprdhdnm On the date stated below that liarty'a signature
sbnelr,lrlllce electrons
ttarrA Cor1T1 lelandtute�t puv[ral fed ra erdihlr aetu.ael.
alp r]Fe tern of lira rYb111 trar e9faeeent•I ch ae[Fernand Caoncy eeslecer of ee.ds,
BK 1809 PG 1274 DOC#200037229 BK 1809 PG1275 DOC#200037229
Meeh1tEourg County.North Carolina Glut, Cnpnty,North Carolina
I tertify I hat Shawn D.Wilkerson personally appeared Worm me this day,acknowledging tome that he t tart ly[eat the rptl5wing person perianalrp aprlearel dcfnretne this day,acknowledging to me that Inc
is President of Wildlands Engineering,Inc,a North Garonne corporation and that r•e,ac President,being or she signea tttp roregping donrmerli-
assttwrired to do se executed the feregning on behalf ofwlldtandsEngmeertng,Inc.
Corral Irrc7pel
Dec G;/I!n I r7CreX3
Date.
mum 0044,
_`�ZtH MA ��, �• " ' fd'- 14P iw Signature RJNarnry
.7 cy Off+Ttnf Stgndture of Norco.
1.rti T'N
Z/VO �M1 Notary's printed a,typed name
PI+Si t' z� NFrrory9 prieleeatyped namr LR A4S I1 age',!
/ T My cnmrnhslon expires: ��.Ce�N
( My cvmmitlotn alums-6$ff.V.912,2✓1
� f1RG cge Jr'r 111II F
I l7nitr
i rl

ell TOW PG lass-1339 lay DOCO 20003724D Bi{1809 PG 1337 ❑OC#200037240
This Document eRecorde<. 03/1702020 12:23.34 PM
Fee•$2G W Tax:30.00
Cleveland County.Nnrih Carolina
Belly S harnage,Register of deeds
BUYER: SELLER:
WILD(AN OS ENGINEERING,INC.,n North C3m'Ina WIUTAM LAWITENCE HAMRl 1 and
Carper Ion 11y; by: l R+Y cC—
I
awn D.Wilkerson.President n eNamric
Date' -1'Le..lF-- AVO Pale: y7 WE-1 /-L' .7 rJr7 l
RECORDING RE QUESTED aY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
W ldlands Frglreerf ng.Inc.
1A30 South LW Street,Stine 104
°tar/Me,NC 38303
Attmtfan:Lee lnlgh&Caffery
SFACEABOVETHIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
MEMORANDUM OF O!!ION
This Memorandum of Option{this 9 ulfl npdunt`1 Is between Wlilhrn lawreitee Honda
{"Saber"l,iod WI/glands Englneering,inc.,a North Cerallnn comarer/or/("BatiNel.
This memoranddrn will become effective when ail parties have signed II. The dale of tail
Memorandum will be the date this Memorandum Is slgned by the Iasi parry to sign IS.
Seller does hereby Ore and gram to Guyer the rlghl and option td purchase a Comsen odors
e asement on a pardon of a parcel of real property comprised of appro.lmately 163 16 acne kxated at
011 Oak Drooc Road In ICings Mountaln,Cleveland County,North CsroNna,recorded el that county's
Register of Deeds at Book 1169,Page 210g(the"Pronertf").
Tots option eaplres on March 26,2023 and thedndrie shall pout On dr verve die dare that Is 3C
dam after the option enplrataan.
The}. provisions set faith In an Option Agreement betwOn the parties with an effective date et
-TTIALA% I Ia7.b 2020 are hereby incorporated In this memorandum.
Each parry Is slgreng this memorandum on the dell stared below that pony's signature-
•
soon meted elaccrenlcally by tin fetanea enlifKn roc."
In compliance with darofi atoll ea statuses dnermin recordable Jansen.
✓<.toms of the.uenrcer agreement rteh[IN CI.:iJansen.eee many mal+ter of Blear.
BK 1809 PG 1338 ❑CC#200037240 BK 1809 PG 1339 DOC#200037240
Mecklenburg County,Nvrth Carolina County,Nd ardllne
i certify that Shown D.Wilkerson personally appeared before me this day,acknOMMIL/ing to me that he I=ffferflly that William Lawrence Hamrldl personally appeared before me this dry,acanowlede eR In me
Ii frfftdenldf Wildmrtds fngrneerine,Inc,a North Carolina enrpvrarlpn and that he,as Pras1dent,being that he Drone signed the repagoing document(
adcharlred to do as,1Raculed the(ongoing an heialt of Wlkdlamis Eri feeenng Inc. Date:31J
t7i2U •
Dare: Glirx./XX) (tidal Seal[
I SipnoMre of*Harp
Otn ek
•
NorwyS prinivd or typed n WI r
c` )P4:" My cdmmissinn expires: W /Z�
y`'�ti Q51?l N�„r�r OffCIa131yrraipre of Newy r
'41e ap7Agg, �Rna J RR7'7N�RZe�Io
ALIBoo VM1 Nordry'sprinred arryped nine �".•¢'
My commission aephes:n1/Il7,aa l m
rlllllltt AR.•Cie w 2;'de4
a �

BPS 1809 PG 1275-1279(4) DOC*200027220 BK 1809 PG 1277 DOC#200037230
This Oocumenl eftecorded: 03/17/2O20 11:44.15 AM
Fee.$26 DO Tax:90.09
Cleveland County.Norm Carolina
Belay S Harnage,Register of Deeds
(Vas: SERER':
WlEtl``OS Eya[ilTIEEMelD,INC,a Nw'i Carnln.a LUKE EOWAROIIIOO
coral on
4: �� P•
v+tin Wideman,President Luke Edward Judd
Clara 03—)7aa dare, 3-1-1`R.ti
tEEOt CMG RBA/FETED BY
ANC,WHEN RECORDED MAR Ttf:
Midlands Sr 3nerr.NL.lilt.
1430 South More stroat,acne mid
Charlotte,NC aCmHt
Arle nt:on.lea KetCht fat$e ry
ShACS ABOVE This LINE FOR RECOPOER'S USE
MEMORANDUM OF OPfMON
This Memorandum of Option Elbe"Memorandum"l is between Luke Edward Judd l°SElkf),and
Midlands Engineerinj,Inc,a Nerrh Carolina edrpntapoe reaper).
This memorandum will become cherries wn en all parties nave signed It the date of the
Memorandum Will OPthe date DM Mlmv dodpin ir dried by the las?PQ MM En fra r II
Seeler dots hereby glee and gram to toyer the nen and option ro pantheon a cvrnerva+•on
easement tin R Pollan of thine pertvre ut real property canip.i>rd al appnphlmatale 1,11.TO and 17.48
respectively,.Moaned ore Dillon Read in kings Mountain,Cleveland eosin ,North Carolina,recorded
m Mat canny*Regisreirvf Daub a.Brink 1114,Pape E043 frhe'Property}.
This upnran,.count on March D6,3013:nil the timing anal.usur on or before OE dater har Is 36
data after Oil:option eaptration.
the nrawnalis�qsec lone in au Opi ie.Agreement between the parties with an eductive dais of
',L
' ° t_Col--7020 are hereby incorporated N lh a trl4 tonttdklm.
ads party rs signing this memorandum on rho dace staled below,hat parry's signnlure
annul tied el tat-poke ll y ay Nit lasends End 1 tie.r inv. .
Indrph llenrsa ant?. rl.W(111 tie aLatuCaal[nrihe1 pp ardaale do ue.i.
r epraa.perr n cirri lend iovnnpSRepf.tet SE oaeda.
BK 1809 PG 1278 ❑GC#200037230 BK 1809 PG 1279 ❑OC#200037230
rdODMilbprj(Aunty,Norte Carolina JHCIk0 VS)n Caunly,Norm Lanalna
y COMP?lint Shawn9,*Iceman persnnaky appeared Solar me PAO dee,arkdpwled eel.l jmgep ma trier he I ty trial the foulomblp,povssa penOnally appeared Were me ina dad,MlinnWiadgeta 90 irn Ina?Ii.
is Oresdenr nI W,idlards ETWheefd+g,Ier.,a Nash Carolina corpotniroe and that he,as presldeni,belrg pi Si*signed the firming pnctemenl:
aulnoryed co desa,mama, lire Iprejarng on hehatfcl WMdtend,EnErnperin0,lee.
/Ilk{ �ahaC)J[eCI,C.0
Nome pf preempol
Dale: C23/7I
nate: 3117/95 ../
Or1 II
Ca"ftl, ll
Soomanr of'won,"i�p'S1N Il'�rFcc ` v�(51111 f7jr O/1R+c1 S'ontp �Ncicry
' DTAR os TAl 157RRr:KN—Aid2FL GA 's 1f I � Nrrgc lOrr�
-j; Y T —T 4p TAgk rS Nnmry'e eneen.d pr typed name
He 61.50+ = No[gy's pniuepor typed nerve ='fn', POOLyG My Cninrnusice morn' °VPVa'1.2'}
+/ My COMMIaliss events Qg//1/�Ci :+'f�

BK 1809 PG 1280-1282 id) QGC#200037231 BK 1809 PG 1281 ❑OC#200037231
Thic Oocumen!eRecorded: 03/17/2020 11.45.14 AM
Fee'$26 DO To $0.00
Cleveland County.Note Carolina
Belly S 1larnage,RegIster of Deeds
BUYER: SELLER,
WADLANOS ENGINEERING,INC,a Nnrtn[.ernlma BARBAIRA!WANTON DELLINGER
corppr Inn I�y��� y� f��f
61C yL'rJrllV— RYY P.I.4i =se YILt9G{J
0 Wiheneon,presidenr Barbara aI eE ei Dellinger
Date: i1L} 1.o dun..3-/G->7QeIr
RECORDING NEg11E5TED 25
AND WHEN RECORDED!RAIL TO:
W ilblands Engineering,Inc.
;a30 South Mint Sneer Hobe 104
Marlene,NC 22703
Artendon:Lee Killghr Gfferr
SPACE ABOVE TNIS LIRE FOR RECORDER'S USE
MEMORANDUM OF OPTION
TRIs Memorandum or Option MI5'Memorandum")H between Barbara alanten Belanger
("Seller"{,and WIldtands Engineerng,Inc,it Nona Carolina twat/Don I"BNy0-ft.
nib mcmorandum Will become elfeetici when ail parties nave awed R. The date of this
Memorandum will he-I he dale this Memorandum i5 sgned by the Iast parry to sign it.
Seller does hereby give and prang ea Buyer tie rigln and option In purchase a ronhernatlun
eni sine portion of Iwo parcers of reel otoddry remarked of approximateN 36 53 acres and 16.05
et(ea,respSClhrelr,'fixated et 135 Dillon Road In Kings Mountain,Cleeniand Nonti Carolina,
recorded In iha[M15nty's tiegister pr Deeds et Book 1.175,Page 1350 and BneS 125a,Page 2205{tile
'Property").
Psis tptlon mires en Mardi 26.2023 and the closing Shall 21.Cur on or before the data Met•s 30
days after the option min ration.
tea{ The p.eoicitlns set fonds In an Dpllpn Agreement between the babies with an etfecllye dale of
•}•1►.Y� ��'I��,lh20 are heilhy Inporporated In Mil memorandum.
Fad party Is nsannp this memorandum oh the dare;Wed below that pa+ly'S dgriat we
5ieeltted e7Ecerontc.11 es,1rlld1*ds Fndlne.rlry Ind-'
indSeh ltepraa.Pth„rgr111 31n'ella►atatuta.g1r,:I1y ncerda112 eerp�nta
e ear.I.ME ale„ he t:laua1KM re.Jnty ee2l.the er peed..
BK 1809 PG 1282 DOC#200037231 BK1809 PG 1283 ❑GC#200037231
Mecklenburg Cn5ntr,North Carolina .��'r-IG� Caui.It,North Caru0na
I odrtify that Shawn El Wilkerson personally appeared before me this day,acknowledging rn lee hut lea 15flSrfy INN the following piton personally appeared Petpre me this day,acknowledging to me that he
Presinene of Wlldlands Engineering.lot..a Berth Caroline corporetltn and,hot he,a.President,being Sir Ole signed Me foregoing document
authrxlxed to do so,executed Ine'Foregoing on behalf or W ildrandk ngineering,Inc. JJ ru // rI
eff d6rk 1_I? � I'q}
/:n l AR I/Jn per
Nome cn prinrfpPl ,]
Rai,:
Dole: -
IS1110.3l5eall .-...r•J6 it , 5m A4p73i
`�y`gt11111e+=r a�,r Offirfel Srgnsular pf NntorY +� fir` f eud 9Dno[ure�Noterl'
S1Hr1l N"YFcy
▪ I• tOYAi;r = �M1u I TS Ar T���/r�!✓ - 0.0 = Nofp Sr Motet/Of[YAedeomF
Yy v- Notoryi printed onlgped name 1, ALl111-1 t� C•-fl '�{'a[I
j laeoC• �� p My Commission expires 2
Mle commission expires.1'11)4 ..q �yi tc• p°
Uric Gam" '41r t LCrs++��`
N SAS'+
3 '1

S& Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
E
11010 Ruvru Ridge Road • Ralogh. North Curoloid 27h14 • Moak: I 9)8-0-5900 • F;ic: 019}841-907
www-S;wdECcnm
PRELIMINARY HYDRIC SOIL INVESTIGATION
Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
Kings Mountain, NC
PIEDMONT
Broad River Basin
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Mr. Eric Neuhaus
Wildlands
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
ID SOIL
., S d; '. 1 ifs ivn
m ,
0006111
°A, MOS
A�wEnje9 NORTH,
March 20th, 2020
1

INTRODUCTION
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC, PA) was retained to perform a preliminary evaluation to
assess the presence and extent of hydric soils onsite. Portions of the evaluated areas are currently
planted in herbaceous grass,while the remainder is made up of mature mixed hardwoods. Areas that are
considered to be hydric soils contained hydric soil indicator F3. (see attached Figure A- Preliminary Soils
Investigation Map)
METHODOLOGY
On March 17`h, 2020 S&EC, PA staff performed a hydric soil evaluation at the site. Hand auger borings
were advanced on the property at locations as appropriate to approximately estimate the location and
extent of hydric soils within the project area (see attached Figure A- Preliminary Soils Investigation Map).
Each soil boring was evaluated to assess the presence or absence of hydric soil indicators. Hydric soil
indicators were identified utilizing the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States-A Guide
for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils (Version 8.2, 2018).
Most of the areas evaluated are mapped as the somewhat poorly drained Chewacla (Fluvaquentic
Dystrudepts). All hydric soils observed onsite were most like the Wehadkee soil series (Typic
Fluvaquents) and any variations in the soil profiles were within the range of characteristics detailed in the
Official Series Description.
RESULTS
Approximately 41 soil borings were performed within the study area. Soil characteristics were
evaluated, and all areas identified as containing hydric soils met the hydric soil criteria described
below. Several of the borings met F3 indicator (a) while most met F3 indicator (b) (see below)
Soil boring locations are indicated on the attached Figure A- Preliminary Soils Investigation Map.
All soil borings had a depleted matrix (F3 indicator) within 10" of current land surface. A few
borings had an F19 indicator above the F3 (b) indicator as indicated in the table included in
Figure A.
Indicator F3: Depleted Matrix
Technical Description: A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent
or more chroma of 2 or less and that has a minimum thickness of either:
(a) 2 in. (5 cm) if the 2 in. (5 cm) is entirely within the upper 6 in. (15 cm)
of the soil, or
(b) 6 in. (15 cm) starting within 10 in. (25 cm) of the soil surface.
2

Depth to Depth of
Boring'11Hydric Boring Hydric
'� ._____
— Indicator Indicator Project Parcels
B1 0"-F3 B22 0"-F3 rl�l�l�_
, #
_� 0111" #. B2 3"-F3 B23 10"-F3 Proposed Conservation Easement
___________
,_ ,,____ , /,„ _
i 2" F19 I..m. .P
/(r „„iy,
� B3 B24 0"-F3
- ///
__________---,„ I
6"-F3 Soil Borings and Observations within 10" of the Soil Surface
.� �.. — B4 6"-F3 B25 Non-Hydric
B4:Nit,: V B5 3" F3 B26 4"-F3 Hydric
B4 i`'� C B6 10"-F19B27 Non-Hydric
Boarderline_ _ _
�, ,�, 4
�,• '� (r/r,
_ ,A---- B7 Non-Hydric B28 Non-Hydric) O Non hydric
• .. 1' • B8 Non-Hydric B29 3"-F3 :+• '
g37 B36 >4 \ ___,-7:- B9 Non-Hydric B30 Non-Hydric I,-• Proposed Wetland Restoration Zones
��, ;.. ''t•_ B10 6"-F3 B31 Non-Hydric
.„..... ---,\ \._.,
B3 k________ B11 Non-Hydric B32 Non-Hydric j WetlandRehabilitationB'4 - '17-Th.., 7 B12 Non-H dric 633 911-F3
y Bon-Hydne
''''"----) .. \ B33 j// Wetland Re Establishment
It
�� 613 $0„FF3 B34 Non-Hydric
).::-\� �, B14 0"-F3 B35 Non-Hydric>------ \' I \ . Existing Streams
615 Non-Hydric B36 Non-Hydric
fn
\s...,,,,,
\\________N \ •
- I B16 Non-Hydric B37 Non-Hydric� '
eijq, B17 0"-F3 B38 0"-F3 Existing Ditch
.9� B18 Non-Hydric B39 Non-Hydric `
2 Cp / B19 0"-F3 B40 Non-Hydric h Topographic Contours(2')
@ r 620 Non-Hydric B41 Non-Hydric �
\\\ B21 Non-Hydric
mew-
' 1 B3 ' .
/'----37/1,
'..-- -: ---t
:f..1� _ J y
Z :1, ////
_
y 9 B28 e
7------.
,,,0.2,--\. \ _____, --) . •
---__ — i \ - //
i / \/ .\-\:•-•—_,--------tlli,.„.„./. ,>- -rir--) ) 7? ,..„,,,,,......,.:: ,,..,_.__.._..,7/17.,/.. se. \
\---.....\\—\\i --... . \\\.\\.,,, ,...,."..L,F ,:fr:
\-, ' "' ' •■•,.'""."
, 7,. + A-
..„7":„:// 4_
7------ , „, \\. \___ \ -1\ -. -...._7 B i + • 4
;14 g ).'i
i/4
"�-. B 1)
B / \ B 13
ii..
_ ,..... ._ ,,,q1,1/4 - 1\.\____ 1
•
: -.r • ! -
Location of Soil Profile 1 (B17)‘ ,"------,,,..-- ------- /
.� r -- 624 B2 _ -'"''� Bridge" :reiej:k_1:,....,, ,/,,lisic:si71",.._,..._////>15
c:
A..--/ • • L.Bitymo_-, -„ - ••• .-
, • ) Th\---
. , r._ . .---____---------A ---1__3
•
)Y-- _-,-- 111
19 ogra r I. �� \ 1 I 1 111 ^ \ f1 ——� '' J
Figure A
Ookisitiv WI L D L A N D S Preliminary Soil Investigation
E ry G I N E E R 1 N G 0 500 1 ,000 Feet " Bridgefork Dairy Mitigation Site
N BroadRiver Basin 03050105
I I I I I Cleveland County, NC

Soil Profile#1/ Boring Location B17
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3
Series and TaxonomicClass:Wehadkee—Fine-loamy,mixed,active,nonacid,thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0 to 10 A 2.5Y 5/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M & PL Sandy Clay Fe Masses and pore linings
Loam present
10 to 14 Bg1 2.5Y 3/1 95 10YR 4/4 5 C M Sandy clay Fe Masses present
loam
NOTE: In all areas considered to be hydric,the F3 indicator was found within 10" or less from the soil surface and was 6" or more in thickness
(see table on attached Figure 1 - Preliminary Soils Investigation Map)as required to meet the F3 criteria. In such cases,the soil horizon above the
horizon containing the F3 indicator would be an A horizon containing a chroma of 3 or more and without redox features unless that horizon was
noted to meet the F19 hydric soil criteria.