20001432 Ver 9_Emails_20111116

RE Sanford Bypass mod Page 1 of 2
RE Sanford Bypass mod
Beauregard, Rachelle
Sent Wednesday November 16 2011 9 31 AM
To Herndon Mason
Cc Smith Ronnie D SAW[Ronme D Smith@usace army md] Tillman Marty C Carrdlo Sonia Kmg Art C
Mason
I wanted to wa�t to responcl to this unt�l after you� No� 15 meeting I will be preparmg a letter w�th an
updated summaiy sheet and the rmtigation foi the 50 feet at Site 5 This should be submitted the latest
by early next week
Rachelle
From Herndon, Mason
Sent Monday, October 31, 2011 10 43 AM
To Beauregard, Rachelle, King, Art C �
Cc Smith, Ronnie D SAW, Tillman Marty C, Carnllo, Sonia
Sub�ect Sanford Bypass mod
Rachelle and Art I have reviewed the permit mod request for R 2417AA The following corrections and
additional information is required for DWQ to complete your request
Site 5—The impacts for this site in the original 401 were permitted as impacts to a perennial stream which
required mitigation I need a mitigation proposal for the additional permanent impacts that occurred at this
site The additional impacts to Site 6 are considered permanent because the original dimensions and profile of
the stream were permanently altered by the actions of the contractor Furthermore I will need a revised
impact summary sheet that reflect the 50 ft of additional permanent impacts that occurred at this site
FYI during my last visit the culvert was perched about 0 9 ft which appeared to be more than it was at my last
visit I have arranged for Galen Cail to come to the next review on Nov 15 to make recommendations on how to
correct this issue
Site 6—Was permitted as intermittent system and DWQ will reserve the right to determine if the impacts for the
crossing are indeed temporary after the temporary crossing is removed At the time of permitting DWQ was
not requiring mitigation for impacts to intermittent systems therefore if the impacts for this crossing are
deemed permanent additional mitigation will not be required In the meantime to process the permit mod as
currently proposed I will need a revised impact summary sheet reflecting the additional 30 ft of impacts for the
crossing at this site
Site 9 Sta 177+29(LT/RT)—was permitted as impacts to a perennial system and DWQ will reserve the right to
determine if the impacts for the crossing are indeed temporary after the crossing is removed if DWQ deems
that the stream has been altered from its original dimension and profile after the crossing is removed DOT will
be required to mitigate for the entire reach that was permentantly impacted by the crossing In the meantime
to process the permit mod as currently proposed I will need a revised impact summary sheet reflecting the 10 ft
of additional impacts for the crossing
The above clarifications and additional information needs to be submitted as soon as possible If we do not
receive it within 15 days of this e mail we will be forced to issue an official hold letter on your modification
request
https //mail nc gov/owa/�ae=Item&t=IPM Note&id=RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4%2b 11/16/2011

RE Sanford Bypass mod Page 2 of 2
Ronnie did I cover everything? Is there any additional information you need to process this?
Marty&Art it would be great if the crossings are removed and the stream restored to its natural state prior to
our next visit so we can close this issue out Please see if this can be done
If you have any questions or if I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me
Thanks�
MH
Mason Herndon
Environmental Senior Specialist
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
mason herndon@ncdenr gov
Phone [phone]
E mail correspondence to and from this address may be sub�ect to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
Emad correspondence to and from this sender is sub�ect to the N C Pubhc Records Law and may be disciosed to third parties
https //mail nc gov/owa/�ae=Item&t=IPM Note&id=RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4%2b 11/16/2011