The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20111057 Ver 1_401 Application_20111211 Dennison, Laurie From Hardison Lyn Sent Tuesday December 06 2011 7 38 AM To Dennison Laurie � Sub�ect Express 401 application attached Attachments HPDTA Power Lme Easement PCN and CAMA_11292011fi1e pdf Hi Laurie We have an express 401 minor that we are accepting into express today Attached is the application and plans We will send a hard copy to you via courier today Could you please enter this application into the system and let me know the pro�ect number so that I can enter the events and fee Thanks for your help O Lyn PLEASE IVOTE MY E MAII ADDRESS HAS CHANGED TO Ivn hardison@ncdenr�ov Lyn Hardison Environmental Assistance Coordinator NCDENR Division of Environmental Assistance&Outreach(DEAO) Customer Serwce Home Washington Regional Office 943 Washington Square Mall Washington NC 27889 Phone 252 948 3842 Fax 252 975 3716 p/ease consider rhe en�lronmenr beyF'ore prfnr/n,�thls e-mal/ E mail correspondence to and from this address may be sub�ect to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties 1 �.,� �� - ►fls� oF war� _a� pG Office Use Only � � � r Corps action ID no � �� p Y DWQ pro�ect no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notificahon PCN Form A A l�cant Informahon 1 Processmg 1a Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b Speafy Nationwide Permit(NWP)number 14 or General Permit(GP)number 1 c Has the NWP or GP number been venfied by the Corps� �Yes ❑ No 1d Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ(check all that apply) ❑401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit �401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit because wntten approval is not required� Certification ❑Yes � No ❑Yes � No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation �Yes ❑ No of impacts� If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program 1 g Is the pro�ect located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h �Yes ❑ No below 1 h Is the pro�ect located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)� �Yes ❑ No 2 Pro�ect Information 2a Name of pro�ect Power Line Access Road 2b County Perquimans 2c Nearest murncipality/town Hertford 2d Subdivision name Harvey Point Defense Testing Activity 2e NCDOT only T I P or state pro�ect no 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s)on Recorded Deed Harvey Point Defense Testing Actrvity 3b Deed Book and Page No Book number 1 Page Number 1 3c Responsible Party(for LLC if Pam Klepc Environmental Program Manager applicable) 3d Street address 2835 Harvey Pomt Road 3e City state zip Hertford North Carolina 27944 3f Telephone no 252 426 4360 3g Fax no 252 426 4369 3h Emad address hpdta env saf@us army md Page 1 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version t � w1 �` 1 � � 4 Appl�cant Informat�on (if d�fferent from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑Agent ❑ Other specify 4b Name 4c Business name (if applicable) 4d Street address 4e City state zip 4f Telephone no 4g Fax no 4h Emad address 5 AgenUConsultant Informat�on(if applicable) 5a Name Claudette L Twichell PhD 5b Business name Solstice Enwronmental LLC (if applicable) 5c Street address 800 Sandoval Dnve ' 5d City state zip Virgirna Beach Virginia 23454 6544 5e Telephone no 757 408 0023 5f Fax no 866 783 5282 5g Emad address claudette@solsticeenv com Page 2 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version B Pro�ect Information and Prior Pro�ect History 1 Property Identifcation 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) PARCEL_ID 2 Q073 0031 and lot number(PIN 7886 94 5371 Latitude 36 04 32 052N Longitude 76 1 b Site coordinates(in decimal degrees) 17 23 100W (DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD) 1 c Property size approximately 3 000 acres 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water(stream river etc)to Perquimans River and Albemarle Sound proposed pro�ect 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receivmg water SC 2c River basm Pasquotank River Basin 3 Pro�ect Description 3a Descnbe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicmity of the pro�ect at the time of this application The existing power Ime easement currently has a gravel access road withm the bounds of the easement to provide maintenance access for the existing power poles Normal conditions exist at the site at the time of this application 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existmg wetlands on the property approximately 860 acres 3c List the total estimated Imear feet of all existmg streams(intermittent and perenrnal)on the property No named perennial water bodies are located at HPDTA However branches of an unnamed marshy drainage bisect HPDTA m the east to west direction Small tributaries associated with this drainage empty directly in the Albemarle Sound m a southerly direction A stormwater conveyance system does not exist at HPDTA except for the existence of channelized drainage ditches that flow to the Albemarle Sound and to a lesser extent to the Perquimans River There are approximately 184 007 linear feet(34 8 mtles)of ditches in hydnc sods on HPDTA Conversely there are 97 680 linear feet(18 5 mdes)of ditches through non hydric soils 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed pro�ect The Proposed Action includes the construction of a new gravel access road along the alignment of an existing overhead power line easement contaming an existing gravel road The proposed design wdl upgrade the existing easement to accommodate the construction of a stable roadway to assist HPDTA in sufficiently meeting all installation secunty standards in accordance with Department of Defense(DOD)requirements as defined within Section 797 or 501 Urnted States Code(U S C)(Section 21 of the Internal Secunty Act of 1950) 3e Descnbe the overall pro�ect m detad mcluding the type of equipment to be used The proposed design wdl upgrade the existing easement to accommodate the construction of a stable roadway to assist HPDTA in sufficiently meeting all installation security standards in accordance with DOD reqwrements as defined within Section 797 or 501 United States Code(U S C)(Section 21 of the Internal Security Act of 1950) The power line easement currently has a gravel access road within the bounds of the easement to provide maintenance access The rypical section for the road improvements wdl be a 18 foot width constructed of gravel base The total pro�ect length is approximately 3 800 linear feet and the proposed road improvements wdl connect with existmg installation roads All erosion and sediment control measures and practices wdl be stnctly adhered to and all erosion and sediment control measures wdl be in place prior to or as a first step in construction All land disturbed by mobdization/construction access to pro�ect sites wdl be restored to their original pre construction condition Temporary erosion and sediment control measures wdl not be removed untd all disturbed areas upstream of them are stabdized Wetland impacts are kept to the minimal extent practicable and for each of the impacted wetland areas within the pro�ect area the disturbed area wdl be kept to the minimum necessary required All excavated matenals must be deposited and retamed m an upland area Contours will be re-graded to pre construction conditions as practicable Page 3 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Jurisdictional Determmations 4a Have�unsdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtamed for this property/ pro�ect(including all prior phases)in the past� �Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments 4b If the Corps made the�unsdictional determmation what type � prelimmary � Final of determination was made� 4c If yes who delineated the�unsdictional areas� Agency/Consultant Company Solstice Environmental LLC Name(if known) Claudette L Twichell PhD Other 4d if yes list the dates of the Corps�urisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation September 2009 5 Pro�ect History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtamed for �Yes � No ❑ Unknown this pro�ect(including all pnor phases)m the past� 5b If yes explain in detad according to help file instructions 6 Future Pro�ect Plans 6a Is this a phased pro�ect� ❑Yes � No 6b If yes explain C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary 1a Which sections were completed below for your pro�ect(check all that apply) �Wetlands � Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction Page 4 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of�urisdiction number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent(P)or (if known) DWQ—non-404 other) (acres) Tem ora T W 1 ❑ P❑T ❑Yes ❑Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P ❑T Fdl and Culvert PEM ❑Yes � Corps 0 265 Installation � No � DWQ W3 � P❑T Fdl and Culvert PEM ❑Yes �Corps 0 013 Installation � No � DWQ W4 � P ❑T Fdl and Culvert PEM ❑Yes � Corps 0 001 Installation � No � DWQ W5 ❑ P❑T ❑Yes ❑Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑T ❑Yes ❑Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g Total wetland�mpacts 0 279 2h Comments The identified wetlands are in a natural state and do not contain existing culverts within the wetland boundanes of the power Ime easement Culverts wdl be constructed in these locations as part of construction activities to provide for proper water flow for the new stable roadway No tree clearing wdl be required at this location The proposed work is to address maintenance issues with respect the proposed existing gravel road improvements All erosion and sediment control measures and practices will be strictly adhered to and all erosion and sediment control measures wdl be m place pnor to or as a first step in construction All land disturbed by mobdization/construction access to pro�ect sites wdl be restored to their origmal pre construction condition Temporary erosion and sediment control measures wdl not be removed untd all disturbed areas upstream of them are stabdized 3 Stream Impacts If there are perenrnal or intermittent stream impacts(includmg temporary impacts)proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perenrnal Type of�urisdiction Average Impact number (PER)or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent(P)or intermittent DWQ—non-404 width (Imear Temporary(T) (INT)� other) (feet) feet) S1 � P❑T Repacement of unnamed ❑ PER � Corps 3 50 existing culverts � INT � DWQ S2 ❑ P❑T ❑ PER ❑Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P❑T ❑ PER ❑Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P❑T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑T ❑ PER ❑Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P�T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tr�butary�mpacts 50 3i Comments This stream is characterized as a low drainage swale/dramage ditch which is characterized by herbaceous vegetation and is generally fdled with 5 10 mches of water There is currently a gravel access road which traverses through this location with existing culverts to allow proper water flow and drainage The culverts in this location wdl be replaced as part of general base mamtenance activities since the culvert has been damaged due to continued use as it has aged No tree cleanng wdl be reqwred at this location Page 5 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuanes tnbutaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact(acres) Permanent(P)or Tem ora T 01 ❑ P ❑T 02 ❑ P �T 03 ❑ P�T 04 ❑ P❑T 4f Total open water�mpacts 4g Comments 5 Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed then com lete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Wetland Impacts(acres) Stream Impacts(feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Fdled Excavated Flooded Fdled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required� ❑Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no 5i Expected pond surface area (acres) 5� Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts(for DWQ) If pro�ect wdl impact a protected npanan buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts below If an im acts re wre miti ation then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a ❑ Neuse ❑Tar Pamlico ❑Other Pro�ect is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent(P)or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act re wred� 61 ❑ P�T ❑Yes ❑ No 62 ❑ P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 63 ❑ P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h Total buffer�mpacts 6i Comments D Impact Justification and Mitigation Page 6 of 11 PCN Form-Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 1 Avoidance and Mmimization 1a Speafically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in desigrnng pro�ect An alternatives analysis was completed to evaluate additional alternatives that could avoid and/or mmimize environmental impacts from the proposed action The alternative presented in this application is the least environmentally damaging alternative in that the new gravel access road wdl be located along the alignment of an existmg overhead power line easement contairnng an existing gravel road Limited tree cleanng would be required for the construction on the new gravel road The power Ime easement currently has gravel access within the bounds of the easement to provide maintenance access The typical section for the road improvements was limited to a 18 foot width constructed of gravel base rather than a 20 foot width The total pro�ect length is approximately 3 800 linear feet which is the minimum required to connect with existmg mstallation roads US Waters were identified withm the proposed pro�ect area with a US Army Corps of Engineers venfication completed September 2009 Based on additional design evaluations wetlands impacts were further reduced by shifting portions of the alignment southward out of the wetland boundaries The Proposed Action will have no impairment or cumulative impacts to any surface waters or impair existmg surFace water quality conditions No unique habitat or ecosystems wdl be lost due to this action Implementation of the Proposed Action wdl not result in any impacts that wdl reduce environmental productivity 1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or mirnmize the proposed impacts through construction techniques The three identified wetland impact areas are due to the installation of culverts to provide for more efficient water flow through wetlands however there are either non functiornng or no existing culverts in place at these locations Properly sized and placed culverts wdl be installed during construction All erosion and sediment control measures and practices wdl be strictly adhered to and all erosion and sediment control measures wdl be in place prior to or as a first step in construction All land disturbed by mobdization/construction access to pro�ect sites wdl be restored to their onginal pre construction condition Temporary erosion and sediment control measures wdl not be removed untd all disturbed areas upstream of them are stabdized Wetland impacts are kept to the mirnmal extent practicable and for each of the impacted wetland areas within the pro�ect area the disturbed area wdl be kept to the minimum necessary required All excavated matenals must be deposited and retamed in an upland area Contours wdl be re graded to pre construction conditions as practicable 2 Compensatory Mit�gat�on for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the pro�ect require Compensatory Mitigation for �Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State� 2b If yes mit�gat�on is requ�red by(check ail that apply) ❑ DWQ � Corps � Mitigation bank 2c If yes which mitigation option wdl be used for this pro�ect� ❑ Payment to m lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank LLC 3b Credits Purchased(attach receipt and letter) Type PEM Quantity 0 348 acres 3c Comments Timberlake Mitigation Bank for HUC Code 03010205 4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached ❑Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested Imear feet 4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑warm ❑cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested(DWQ only) square feet 4e Ripanan wetland mitigation requested acres 4f Non nparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan Page 7 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5a If usmg a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a descnption of the proposed mitigation plan 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ 6a Wdl the pro�ect result in an impact within a protected nparian buffer that reqwres ❑Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation� 6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the nparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation reqwred 6c 6d 6e Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1 5 6f Total buffer mitigation required 6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank permittee responsible npanan buffer restoration payment into an approved m lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 8 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan(required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the pro�ect include or is it ad�acent to protected nparian buffers identified �Yes � No withm one of the NC Ripanan Buffer Protection Rules� 1 b If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included� If no explam why Comments ❑Yes ❑ No 2 Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this pro�ect� Less than 1 % (gravel road with culvert placement) 2b Does this pro�ect require a Stormwater Management Plan� �Yes ❑ No 2c If thrs pro�ect DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why 2d if this pro�ect DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative descnption of the plan Portions of the proposed gravel road wdl be developed from an existmg gravel road whde portions wdl be constructed through an existing�urisdictional area Whde the area has been previously cleared to accommodate the power lines additional clearing and land disturbance is reqwred to construct the stable roadway Approximately 6 43 acres of land is to be disturbed during construction of the roadway The sods m the area are generally described as Roanoke sdt loam and are classified as poorly drained Erosion control items proposed mclude construction entrance sdt fence culvert mlet and outlet protection and check dams ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who wdl be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan� � DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3 Certif�ed Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government s�unsdiction is this pro�ect� ❑ Phase II 3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply(check all that apply) ❑ USMP ❑Water Supply Watershed ❑Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No attached� 4 DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review � Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached� ❑Yes � No 5 DWQ 401 Urnt Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements� ❑Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5b Have all of the 401 Urnt submittal reqwrements been met? ❑Yes ❑ No F Supplementary Information 7 Enwronmental Documentation(DWQ Requirement) 1 a Does the pro�ect involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the �Yes ❑ No use of public(federal/state)land� 1 b If you answered yes to the above does the pro�ect require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State �Yes ❑ No (North Carolina)Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)? 1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the State Cleanng House� (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter) ❑ Yes � No Comments Since HPDTA is a federal instailation completed NEPA documents are not required to be submitted to the State Clearinghouse 2 Violations(DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 26 0200)� 2b Is this an after the fact permit application� ❑Yes � No 2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) 3 Cumulatrve Impacts(DWQ Requirement) 3a Wdl this pro�ect(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in �Yes � No additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality� 3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered no prowde a short narrative description 4 Sewage Disposal(DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from the proposed pro�ect or avadable capacity of the sub�ect facility Not Applicable no treatment methods wdl be required for this proposed action Page 10 of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version : � 5 Endanpered Speciss 8nd D �ghated Cnt�cal HBbttst(Corps Requ�rement} 5a WUI th�s prc>ject occur in or ne an al�a witfi iederdny protected species o� �Y�y �No habitsY� 5b Have y0u Checked wdh the U WS conoertung Endangered Speaes Act �Yes ❑No �mpscts? � Raleigh 5c If yes ind�cate the USFWS Fi d Oflice you have cvntscted � q$hev�llE 5d What data sou�ces d�d you us to detennne wh�ther your site wauld impact�ndangered Species or Des�gnated Crmcaj Habdat� The North Carolina Natural H ge Progra�r►(NC NHP)and U S Fish and Wld�e Service(USFWS)have�o reconds of rare threatened or enda�er speaes oocumng on Fiarvey Po�nt Defense Testing Acdv�ty fi Esseirtial FI�h Mab�tat(C Requ�rement) fia Wd)this pro�ect oocur in or nea an 8r+ea des�nated as essendal fish habitat� ❑Yes �No 6b What data sources did you u to deUermine whether your site would�mp8ct Essenhal Fish Heb�t'dt� The ladc of perenrnal waterco es or tidal gub md�cates thet no surface wsters or wetlands et HPDTA prov�de essent�al fish habitat(EFH} T H�torio or Prehistaio Cultu 1 Resources(Cor�s Requ��ment) 7a Will this project occur(n or ne r an area thet Uie state teaerei or tnbal govemments have des�gnat as heivmg historic or GuftUrdl preservetl�� n Y� �No status(e g Nat�onal Histonc rust des�naUon or properties slgnifiCSnt m NoRh Caroline hisbty and a aeolOgy)7 7b What dat�souraes did you us to determine whether your site would impact historio or erch�olO�Cal i+esources� AchviUes associeted with this ro�ect w(II take place within an area pnmer�ly characteriz�d as an ex�stmg uUldy easement A reviaw Of the�nstallation s o n bese wide culturst ne5ource mappmg indicates that there are no known erchitet.turel or archaeological s�tes within th i�t�ons of th�s ed�an Based on the review of this iniormedon 2�nd teking irtta aocaunt the locatwn and nature of the pro �Ction ft is essumed ihat these act�ons w�ll hsve no effsct On any knrnm arch�tural or anchaeological resources o furthe�wo�lc�s�eoommended vmthm the proposed action area 8 Flood Zone[fesiga8t�on(C s Requiremenq 8a WIII this project occur m a FE -des�gnated 100-year ftoodplain� ❑Yes �No 8b If yes explain how proJect m ts FEIIAA requirements 7he Proposed Acbon w�ll not occu�wrthin C�stal Zvne Mansgement Areas(76 foot s oreline bufter)or the 1p0-year floodpla�n as mapped by the Federal Emergency AAanagement Agency(FEMA) therefore the Propased Acdon wdl hsve no disturbance tv these resources 8c What sauroe(s)d�d you use ta ke the floodpla�n determmation�Federal Emergancy Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map North roline(panei 7886} � �, �� ,� �011 Z,�►/ Appbcant/Agen s Signature Appl�csnt/Agant's Pnnbad Na (A9ents s�gnadue�s vakd any�`an aumodzatlon�trom ths appl�cant Date is prov�ded) � Page �� of 11 PCN Form—Version 1 �December 10 2008 Ve�on � � Cons�stency Determmahon For Harvey Pomt Defense Teshng Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road Consistency Determination For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Activity Power Line Access Road Perquimans County North Carolina 1 0 Pro�ect Background The pnncipal function of Harvey Pomt Defense Testing Activity(HPDTA)is to test and evaluate conventional high explosives fused ordnance and ballistic matenals under simulated field conditions m search of more diversified uses to meet special requirements HPDTA is located on approximately 2 914 535 acres of land in Perquimans County North Carolina In 1961 the mstallation a World War II(WWII)seaplane base came under the auspices of the Department of Defense(DOD)and was named the Harvey Point Defense Testing Activity Smce that time HPDTA s pnmary mission has been a DOD operated activity serving the mditary services plus fulfillmg the special needs of US Government agencies and departments Figure 1 shows the regional semng of the mstallation HPDTA is generally bounded by the Perquimans River to the north the Albemarle Sound to the east and south and by pnvately-owned woodland agncultural fields and smgle famdy residential development to the west Property in the immediate vicirnry of HPDTA s westem property line is transitiornng from low density rural residential use to high density residential/recreational developments(Holiday Island and Albemarle Plantation) The Harvey Point peninsula was purchased by the Department of the Navy(DON)from private landowners in November 1942 and was established as an air station in support of U S defense operations m WWII After the war the DOD took over the mstallation m 1961 with a pnmary mission similar to the installation s use today to test and evaluate conventional explosives and ordnance HPDTA employs a permanent staff that works mainly m the administration and test range areas and it annually hosts a substantial number of transient and student populations The Proposed Action includes the construction of a new gravel access road along the alignment of an existing overhead power line easement contairnng an existmg gravel road The proposed design wdl upgrade the existing gravel roadway to accommodate the construction of a stable roadway to assist HPDTA in sufficiently meeting all installation secunty standards in accordance with Department of Defense(DOD)reqwrements as defined withm Section 797 or 501 United States Code(U S C)(Section 21 of the Internal Secunty Act of 1950) The power Ime easement currently has a gravel access road within the bounds of the easement to provide maintenance access The typical section for the road improvements wdl be a 18 foot width constructed of gravel base The total pro�ect length is approximately 3 800 linear feet and the proposed road improvements wdl connect with existing installation roads A Record of Categoncal Exclusion(CE)was completed for this Proposed Action in August 2009 and was prepared m accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)of 1969 the Councd on Environmental Quality(CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA(40CFR 1500 1508) Department of Navy regulations contained in 32 CFR Part 775 and Chief of Naval Operations Inst�uction(OPNAVINST)5090 IB Environmental and Natural Resource Program Manual 2 0 Existing Conditions Summary The following information provides a discussion of the normal environmental conditions at HPDTA and the environmental consequences of the Proposed Action Alternative Page 1 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road 21 Sods and Groundwater Soils The ma�or so�l group covering NPDTA is the 4oanoke Tomotley Perquimans association(USDA 1986) 1n genera' this sod grouping is confined to areas along the Albemarle Sound and Perquimans River dramages These sods typically are encountered on nearly level landforms and broad flat areas and they usually are poorly drained The Roanoke Tomotley Perquimans sods mostly have a foamy sod matnx formed from fluvial and marine sediments and loamy or clayey subsod They are poorly suited for agricultural use unless they are drained Five sod types occur at HPDTA Chowan sdt loam Dogue fine sandy loam Roanoke sdt loam Tomotley fine sandy loam and Udorthents(USDA 1986)characterized as ■ Chowan Sdt Loam(CO)(Hydric Yes) Nearly level very poorly drained moderately slow permeabdity Frequently flooded for long penods Found on floodplams of small streams ■ Dogue Fine Sandy Loam(DgA Dg6)(Hydric No) Nearly level to gently slopmg moderately well drained moderately slow permeabdity Seasonal high water table is 1 5 to 3 feet below surface �Found on ridges near small streams ■ Roanoke Sdt Loam(Ro)(Hydric Yes) Nearly level poorly drained slow permeabdity Seasonal high water table is at or near the surface but flooding is rare Found on broad flats and in depress�ons ■ Tomotley Fine Sandy Loam(To)(Hydric Yes) Nearly level poorly drained moderate to moderately slow permeability Seasonal high water table is at or near the surface but flooding is rare Found in flats and slight depressions Udortents Loamy(U)(Hydnc No)Areas of altered sods where the normal sod profile has been destroyed or covered by grading and/or digging operations Found in areas of dredge spod borrow pits and landfills The very poorly drained Roanoke sdt loam encompasses the largest portion of HPDTA(53%) Cho�ran sdt loam Roanoke sdt loam and Tomotley fine sandy loam are listed by USDA as hydric sods(USDA 1991) Together these three sod types comprise approximately 60%of HPDTA Udorthents largely occurnng where dredge spoil and excavated sods were placed can exhibit hydnc and non hydnc characteristics based on the hydrology of the area where the sods are found Dogue fine sandy loam is the only non hydric sod at the installation The ma�or sod group covenng the Proposed Action site location area is the Roanoke sdt loam(Hydnc Yes) association In general this sod grouping has been altered due to the construction of the existing power line easement and the normal sod profile has been destroyed or covered by grading and/or digging operations Groundwater Groundwater is the only potable source of water bemg used in Perquimans County and is comprised of ten aquifers which underlie the Herlford Elizabeth City area Potable water is obtamed from two aquifers in the county the water table aquifer and the Yorktown upper aquifer which is 45 to 100 feet below the surface of the ground The surfiaal sands of the uppermost aqwfer of post Miocene age supplies more water to wells m the Hertford Elizabeth City area than any other aquifer All water used at HPDTA is supplied to the Activity s water tower from one main on site well Because of the relatively shallow depth to saltwater mtrusion the typical yield of wells taken from the aquifers in the vicinity of the Albemarle Sound is less than 50 gallons per minute(gpm)(United States Geological Survey(USGS) 1986) No sole source aquifers are located m the vianity of HPDTA Soils and Groundwater Environmental Consequences Implementation of the Proposed Action wdl not result in any change to the sods or groundwater except for temporary mmor impacts to the sod Surface sods wdl be disturbed temporardy dunng new construction penods Prior to cAnstruction HPDTA wdl apply for and obtain a NPDES Storm Water Permit for Construction from the NCDENR Division of Water Quality The general permit applies to the discharge of stormwater associated with construction Page 2 of 13 Cons�stency Determmahon For Harvey Pomt Defense Test�ng Act�v�ty Power L�ne Access Road activities that result in the disturbance of one acre or more total land area In accordance with the general permit the NCDENR wdl require the preparation of a SPPP and a site speafic erosion and sediment control plan prior to a formal approval for general permit coverage The erosion and sediment control plan wdl be sub�ect to approval by the NCDENR Division of Land Resources and Sediment Control program Erosion and sediment controls wdl also be implemented to minimize displacement of exposed sods 2 2 Natural Resources Vegetahon Approximately 72%of the land area at HPDTA is forested characterized pnmardy by loblolly pme(Pmus taeda) sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) cherry bark oak(Quercus pagodaefolia) swamp chestnut oak(Q michauxn) red maple(Acer rubrum) and yellow poplar(Lmodendron tulipifera)(Geo Marme Inc 2001) HPDTA has a reforestation plan which resulted m approximately 667 5 acres of new reforested land between 2005 and 2012(Geo Manne Inc 2005) Other commurnty types present at HPDTA include open areas that are maintained by mowing or grazmg and palustnne emergent wetlands Dominant species in emergent wetland areas are soft rush or common reed(Juncus effusus) woolgrass(Scirpus cyperinus) coast cockspur(Echinochloa walteri) wart panic grass (Parncum verrucosum) and swamp loosestrife(Decodon verticdatus) Vegetation present on or near the proposed site location is simdar to the typical vegetation found throughout HPDTA as documented m the HPDTA INRMP(Geo Manne Inc 2001) Wildlife HPDTA supports a wide variety of wddlife species providing habitat for many species of fur beanng(game) mammals small mammals birds reptdes and amphibians characteristic of the Outer Coastal Plain There are more than 20 mammal species 100 bird species 22 amphibians 25 reptdes and 49 finfish and shellfish species that are known to or potentially occur on the facdity and m ad�acent waters(Geo Manne Inc 2001) Some species that wdl be expected in this area wdl include common rodents such as house mouse(Mus busculus)or white footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) birds such as Amencan robin(Turdus migratonous) blue�ay(Cyanocitta cristata) fish crow (Corvus ossifragus) and common grackle(Qwscalus quiscula) and reptdes such as eastern box turtle(Terrapene carolma) Large mammals may be discouraged from occupying the facdity by a cham link secunty fence separating the installation from ad�acent properties Ma�or bird groups occurrmg in the area include upland game birds wading birds raptors waterfowl shorebirds woodpeckers and Passeriformes The wetlands and dramages at HPDTA as well as the ad�acent Perquimans River and Albemarle Sound provide habitat for a variery of amphibians and reptdes In addition a number of anadromous fish species utdize Albemarle Sound and its tributanes as spawnmg and nursery grounds includmg stnped bass(Morone saxatils) white perch(Morone Americana) American shad(Alosa sapidissima) alewife(Afosa pseudoharengus) blueback hemng(Alosa aestivalis) The Albemarle Sound and Perquimans River also host many important resident and migratory finfish and shellfish species mcludmg southern flounder(Paralichthys lethostigma) red drum(Sciaenops ocellatus) blue crab(Callinectes sapidus) and grass shnmp(Palaemonetes spp) The lack of perenrnal watercourses or tidal guts indicates that no surface waters or wetlands at HPDTA provide essential fish habitat(EFH) Wddlife present on or near the proposed site location wdl be expected to be simdar to the typical wddlife species found throughout HPDTA as documented in the HPDTA INRMP(Geo Marme Inc 2001) Threatened and Endangered Speaes The Endangered Speaes Act(ESA)of 1973(16 USC 1531 et seq)and subsequent amendments provide for the conservation of threatened and endangered species of arnmals and plants and the habitats in which they are found The DON ensures that consultations are conducted as required under Section 7 of the ESA for any action that may Page 3 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Po�nt Defense Test�ng Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road affect a threatened or endangered speaes In con�unction with the preparation of the INRMP efforts were made to assess the status of any rare plants arnmals and commurnties that could occur at HPDTA There are no documented occurrences of Federal or state listed rare threatened or endangered species at HPDTA(Geo Manne Inc 2001) Results of the assessment indicated that HPDTA does not contam suitable habitat for any Federally listed endangered or threatened species known to occur in the area(USFWS 1998 NCDENR 1998 NCWRC 2004) Results of the assessment mdicated that HPDTA does not contam suitable habitat for any Federally listed endangered or threatened species known to occur in the area Natural Resources Env►ronmental Consequences Implementation of the Proposed Action wdl have no adverse impacts on the Federal or state listed rare threatened or endangered species identified m the area since the action will have no impact on existmg vegetation or habitat identified within the proposed acquisition area 2 3 Water Resources HPDTA is located on a low lying peninsula withm the Albemarle Pamlico Drainage Basin The basm contains mostly forested and agricultural land The watershed mcludes four ma�or nver basins the Chowan Roanoke Tar Pamlico and Neuse Harvey Point is bound to the north by the Perqwmans River and to the south by the Albemarle Sound The Perqwmans River is classified as a freshwater protected river for secondary recreation fishing aquatic life and wddlife with the supplemental classification of swamp waters havmg low velocities and other natural charactenstics different from ad�acent streams(NCDENR 2003) The Albemarle Sound is classified as a saltwater body protected for primary recreation(swimming on a frequent basis)as well as secondary recreation fishing aquatic life and wifdlrfe(NCDENR 2003) No named perennial water bodies are located at HPDTA However branches of an unnamed marshy drainage bisect HPDTA m the east to west direction Small tnbutanes assoaated with this drainage empty directly m the Albemarle Sound in a southerly direction A stormwater conveyance system does not exist at HPDTA except for the existence of channelized drainage ditches that flow to the Albemarle Sound and to a fesser extent to the Perquimans River Past ditchmg for agricultural purposes and construction of roads and the runway has altered the natural hydrology of the area As documented in the HPDTA INRMP(Geo Marine Inc 2001) there are more than 36 000 linear feet(10 973 m)of ditches throughout the mstallation Dramage at the mstallation flows pnmardy south to the Albemarle Sound except where surface water stagnates m wetland areas with mmimal relief Only a small amount of surface dramage from the mstallation flows north to the Perquimans River These drainage features range from having flowmg water and sigrnficant aquatic life (i e third order drainage and transport outlet ditches)to being stagnant with no sigrnficant aquatic life(i e first order drainage and field and lateral ditches) Water Resources Enwronmental Consequences One mmor stream wdl be temporardy impacted(50 linear feet)and is characterized as a low drainage swale/dramage d�tch which is characterized by herbaceous vegetation and is generally filled with 5 10 mches of water There is currently a gravel access road which traverses through this location with existmg culverts to allow proper water flow and drainage The culverts m this location wdl be replaced as part of general base mamtenance activities smce the culvert has been damaged due to continued use as it has aged No tree clearing wdl be required at this stream location Implementation of the Proposed Action wdl have no adverse impacts on the drainage feature identified in the area 2 4 Wetlands Page 4 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Act�v�ty Power L�ne Access Road A wetland survey was completed at HPDTA in 1998 as part of the installation s INRMP(2007j The results of the survey mdicated that 2371 acres of wetlands occur at HPDTA which represents approximately 13%of the total facdity land area Approximately 90 acres(36 hectares)of the wetlands found at HPDTA are located in a dredge spod disposal area on the south side of the faality An additional survey m 2000 related to land acquisitions resulted m the delineation of an additional 19 2 acres of wetlands In more recent years HPDTA has acqwred several hundred acres of property bringing the total mstallation acreage to 2 914 535 acres though recent land purchases which allowed for an increase in the buffer area around the mstallation Wetland determinations within the acquisition areas were made brmgmg the total wetland acreage on the installation up to 858 7 acres with the most abundant wetland type is palustnne mixed needle and broad leaved deciduous forest These wetlands occur in the bald cypress tupelo or water tupelo forest cover type Approximately 90 acres of the wetlands found on HPDTA are located in the dredge spod disposal area on the south side of the installation About half of the disposal area is forested whde the other half is a marsh dominated by a nearly pure stand of common reed(Phragm►tes australis) Monocultures of common reed lack the diversity and wddlife value of more diverse wetland communities There are also several large ponds in the marsh where the fill material has settled and is now under water The most abundant(approximately 702 acres)wetland type delineated was palustrine deaduous forest largely m part to the extensive wetland system located on the newest land parcel acquisition area This wetland type occurs pnmanly on the Chowan sods on the installation s ma�or drainages Past ditching and the construction of roads and the runway have altered the hydrology of these swamps Construction of the runway interrupted normal flow of a swamp it bisects causing water retainment on its western side and a lack of flow on its eastern side A large canal that bisects the installation diverts much of the water that previously flowed eastward through this drainage Wetland determinations within the Proposed Action area were made utdizing National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) mappmg from the USFWS and limited field mvestigations using the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual Techrncal Report Y 87 1 (January 1987) All critena for wetland vegetation hydrology and sod observation were evaluated and field reconnaissance of the area identified three wetlands areas on the proposed site location • Wetland 2 Palustrine Emerqent Wetland(PEM) This wetland located at approximate station 40+75 on the attached design sheets is characterized as low dramage swale charactenzed by herbaceous vegetation and is generally filled with 10 12 inches of water The wetland is in a natural state and does not contain existing culverts withm the wetland boundanes of the power line easement Culverts wdl be constructed m this location as part of construction activities to provide for proper water flow for the new stable roadway Based on the design for this section of the Proposed Act�on it is anticipated that 11 560 square feet(0 265 acres)of impacts to this wetland wdl be required to complete the construction to provide for the new stable roadway No tree clearmg wdl be required at this wetland location • Wetland 3 Palustnne Emeraent Wetland(PEM1 This wetland located at approximate station 37+50 on the attached design sheets is charactenzed as a low drainage swale/drainage ditch which is characterized by herbaceous vegetation and is generally filled with 4 inches of water There is currently a gravel access road which traverses through this PEM wetland however there are no existing culverts m place at this location A culvert wdl be installed m this location as part of construction activities to allow for more efficient water flow Based on the design for this section of the Proposed Action it is anticipated that 587 square feet(0 013 acres)of impacts to this wetland wdl be required to complete the construction to provide for the new stable roadway No tree cleanng wdl be required at this wetland location • Wetland 4 Palustnne Emerc�ent Wetland(PEM) This wetland located at approximate station 36+00 on the attached design sheets is characterized as the upper limits of a low dramage swale which is characterized by herbaceous vegetation and is generally filled with 4 Page 5 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road inches of water There is currently a gravel access road which traverses through this PEM wetland however there are no existmg culverts in place at this location A culvert wdl be installed in this location as part of construction activities to allow for more efficient water flow Based on the design for this section of the Proposed Action it is anticipated that 46 square feet(0 001 acres)of impacts to this wetland wdl be required to complete the construction to provide for the new stable roadway No tree cleanng wdl be required at this wetland location Wetland Enwronmenfal Consequences The identified wetlands are m a natural state and do not contain existmg culverts within the wetland boundaries of the power Ime easement Culve�ts wdl be constructed in these locations as part of const�uction activities to provide for proper water flow for the new stable roadway No tree clearing wdl be required at the identified wetland locations The proposed work is to address maintenance issues with respect the proposed existing gravel road improvements All erosion and sediment control measures and practices will be strictly adhered to and all erosion and sediment control measures wdl be m place pnor to or as a first step in construction All land disturbed by mobdization/construction access to pro�ect sites wdl be restored to their onginal pre construction condition Temporary erosion and sediment control measures wdl not be removed untd all disturbed areas upstream of them are stabdized Due to the anticipated total permanent wetland impacts greater than 1/10 of an acre wetland mitigation wdl be reqwred per the reqwrements as stated in Nationwide Permit 14 A Pre construction Notification wdl be submitted to US Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Coastal Management(DCM)Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)for this Proposed Action 2 5 Floodplains The Albemarle Sound is a tidal estuary the mlets of which are channels for nsing and falimg tidal waters The widths of the flood hazard areas m Perquimans County in general are rather narrow when compared to those of other counties m North Carolina s Coastal Region Streams and nvers in Perquimans County cut relatively deep channels Wmd tides are the most frequent cause of floodmg m the county Flooding generally occurs along the short mmor tributaries drairnng into the Perquimans River and along the northern section of the Perquimans River north of Hertford The 100 year floodplain which is the level at which a flood is likely to occur only once in a 100 year penod is used to evaluate flood hazard areas The ma�onty of the shoreline at HPDTA is located withm the 100 year floodplam with the largest area of floodplain located south and southwest of the airstnp as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(Flood Insurance Rate Map North Carolina(panel 7886)) The pro�ect s activities wdl not occur within areas of the 100 year floodplam as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Floodplam Environmental Consequences These activities wdl not result m an adverse impact to the100 year floodplam as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency 2 6 Transportation and Utdity Infrastructure HPDTA is located approximately 23 mdes southwest of Elizabeth City and 10 mdes southwest of the Town of Hertford on State Route 1336 southeast of US 17 The primary highway serving the area is U S 17 which allows for travel between Virgirna and North Carolma Two lane secondary State Route 37 connects Hertford with points to the north and west Neither State Route 1336 nor the streets on the mstallation experience traffic congestion problems HPDTA accommodates sewage through a series of septic systems and drain fields that are scattered throughout the installation seroicmg all of the buddings on the site The existmg septic fields are located pnmardy in poorly drairnng clay sods and the naturally occurring groundwater lies at or near to the ground surface HPDTA has a wastewater treatment facdity capable of processing 25 000 gallons of wastewater per day This facdity consists of a wastewater collection system of gravity sewer Imes small duplex gnnder pump stations and force mains Wastewater treatment Page 6 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road is consistent with procedures of surface disposal of treated wastewater by spray irrigation The source of potable water at HPDTA is well water Well water is stored m a water tower and ground tank and is pumped as needed to the mstallation s existing water I�nes that serwce the property The capaciry of the water tower is 125 000 gallons and the ground tank capacity is 600 000 gallons In addition the installation receives its electncal supply from an off base provider A stormwater conveyance system does not exist at HPDTA except for the existence of channelized drainage ditches that flow to the Albemarle Sound and to a lesser extent to the Perquimans River Drainage on the mstallation flows pnmanly south to the Albemarie Sound except where surface water stagnates m wetland areas with minimal relief Only a small amount of surface drainage from the mstallation flows north to the Perquimans River Transportation and Ublify Infrastructure Enwronmental Consequences Implementation of the Proposed Action wdl not change in the current levels of staff transient personnel and students however the proposed design wdl upgrade the existmg easement to accommodate the construction of a stable roadway to assist HPDTA m sufficiently meeting all mstallation secunty standards in accordance with Department of Defense(DOD)requirements as defined within Section 797 or 501 United States Code(U S C) (Section 21 of the Internal Secunty Act of 1950) 2 7 Cultural Resources Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(NHA)of 1966 any proposed Federal or Federally financed undertaking must be considered for its effect on any district site buddmg structure or ob�ect that is mcluded or is eligible for mclusion m the National Register In addition Section 110 of the NHA mandates that Federal agencies establish in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior a preservation program for purposes of identifying evaluation nommatmg to the National Register and protecting historic properties In 1999 HPDTA completed a Phase I Archaeological Inventory Survey(R Chnstopher Goodwin Associates Incorporated 2001) designed to locate identify and delmeate archaeological resources within the HPDTA area As a result of the Goodwin survey 18 archaeological sites were identified including eight prehistoric eight histonc and two multi component sites Phase II testing was recommended on three prehistoric sites(32PQ123 31 PQ127 and 31 PQ131) and two historic sites(31 PQ125 and 31 PQ133) No further archaeological survey was reqwred in connection with the balance of those sites recorded as part of the study(NCDCR Correspondence dates June 6 2005) A Phase II Archaeological Inventory Survey was conducted m January 2005 on three prehistoric sites(32PQ123 31 PQ127 and 31 PQ131)and one historic site(31 PQ133) As a result of the testing of the four sites only one histonc site(Ashland Plantation site 31 PQ133)was recommended for mclusion m the National Register since the site is considered to have good mtegrity of site deposits and contams m situ archaeological features dating possibly as early as the Colornal Period Nonetheless site 31 PQ133 identified as the Ashland Plantation wdl not be impacted due to the Proposed Action A Phase II Cultural Evaluation of Site 31 PQ125 was conducted in February 2010 As a result of the testing Site 31 PQ125 was recommended for mclusion in the National Register under Cnterion D This site currently has a preseroation plan in place so as to avoid any potential impacts to this cultural site In addition a Phase I Archaeological Inventory Suroey was conducted at HPDTA on 114 acres of newly acqwred land located on the west edge of the installation(JRIA 2005) Dunng the course of field testing archaeologists identified 15 small scale sites that yielded only a single artifact or a small groupmg of artifacts all of which were deemed not potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places Three large scale archaeological sites were identified 31 PQ0135 31 PQ0136 and 31 PQ0137 Survey Results mdicated that sites 31 PQ0135 and 31 PQ0136 are not potentially eligible for nomination to the National Register of Histonc Places and no further work is recommended However site 31 PQ0137 located approximately 300 feet to the east and slightly south from site 31 PQ0136 within an open field is considered potentially eligible for nomination to the National Register of Histonc Places because of the site s possible function as an early slave quarter attached to the Ashland Page 7 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power L�ne Access Road Plantation(31 PQ0133) established ca 1775 and located approximately 4 300 feet to the northeast A Phase II evaluation wdl be required for site 31 PQ0137(North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Histonc Preservation Office May 12 2006) however site 31 PQ0137 wdl not be impacted due to the Proposed Action A Phase I Archaeological Inventory Suroey was conducted at HPDTA on several areas(ER 10 0515)(JRIA March 2010)in which archaeologists excavated 243 shovel test pits with a total of 51 artifacts were collected from the positive shovel test holes and surface collection in addition to bnck and mortar The artifact finds sorted themselves out into five archaeological sites all in the vicmity of Goose Nest Lane and Osprey Lane All five sites represent histonc occupations that date from the late eighteenth through the twentieth centuries ■ Site 31 PQ218 is defined by a concentration of mostly mid twentieth century artifacts and a concrete foundation budding pad These are located within an area with the concrete slab located on the northeastern half of the site The slab probably served as the floor of a garage or equipment shed as part of ad�acent site 31 PQ222 Site 31 PQ218 has low research potential due to its age and condition and therefore is not considered to be potentially eligible for nommation to the NRHP(NCSHPO Concurrence letter dated Apnl 6 2010) ■ Site 31 PQ219 is represented by a scatter of late eighteenth/early nmeteenth century ceramics(i e creamware and pearlware)and handmade bnck The site is covered with a fairly urnform plowzone layer and retains a relatively good level of archaeological integnty including the potential for the presence of sub plowzone features Thus in light of these characteristics and the compellmg research questions that can be developed with regard to early histonc settlement of the Harvey Neck area Site 31 PQ219 is considered to be potentially eligible for nomination to the NRHP(NCSHPO Concurrence letter dated Apnl 6 2010) � Site 31 PQ220 dates to the late rnneteenth and early twentieth century and is located ad�acent to Goose Nest Lane The site is marnfested by a fairly heavy concentration of artifacts such as handmade bncks window glass and a diverse assemblage of ceramic specimens Whde the site has good potential for sub plowzone features it is unclear if the site possesses enough integnty to allow for research questions to be applied to the site Therefore site 31 P220 is considered to be potentially eligible for nomination to the NRHP(NCSHPO Concurrence letter dated Apnl 6 2010) � Site 31 PQ221 represents traces of a late nineteenth/early twentieth century domestic site ad�acent to Goose Nest Lane Compared to its counterpart at 31 PQ220 this site lacks a robust amount of artifacts Because of these deficiencies site 31 PQ221 is not considered to be potentially eligible for nomination to the NRHP (NCSHPO Concurrence letter dated Aprd 6 2010) ■ Site 31 PQ222 is a mid twentieth century domestic site situated ad�acent to a gravel access road�ust to the east of Site 31 PQ218 Due to its age and condition Site 31 PQ222 does not possess archaeological research potential and therefore is not considered eligible for nomination to the NRHP(NCSHPO Concurrence letter dated Apnl 6 2010) A Phase II Cultural Evaluation of Site 31 PQ219 and Site 31 PQ220 was conducted in August 2010(JRIA August 2010) As a result archaeologists excavated 77 close interval shovel test holes and five test units at site 31 PQ219 and the total amount of artifacts recovered fits into the palm of a hand Consequently site 31 PQ219 is recommended as not eligible for nommation to the NRHP No further archaeological research is warranted at the site and future construction impacts wdl have no impact on sigrnficant historical or cultural remains(NCSHPO Concurrence letter dated September 20 2010) At site 31 PQ220 archaeologists excavated 80 shovel test holes and eight test units and these generated 859 artifacts Whde the site has good archaeological integrity its research potential is hampered by the lack of documentary evidence that could guide the formation of compelling research questions Therefore site 31 PQ220 is not considered eligible for nommation to the NRHP Cultural Resources Enwronmental Consequences These activities wdl not result in an adverse impact to archaeological features as mapped by the Phase II Archaeological Inventory Surveys Page 8 of 13 Cons�stency Determmahon For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road 3 0 Altematives Analysis This section descnbes the Preferred Action the reasonable alternatives considered and the pro�ect planning cntena in detad to identify and assess the reasonable alternatives to the Proposed Action that wdl avoid or mmimize adverse effects of these actions on the quality of the human environment 31 Alternatives Considered But Dismissed An alternatives analysis was completed to evaluate additional alaternatives that could avoid and/or mmimize environmental impacts from the Proposed Action The alternative presented m this application is the least environmentally damaging alternative in that the new gravel access road wdl be located along the alignment of an existing overhead power line easement contaming an existmg gravel road Limited tree cleanng would be required for the construction on the new gravel road however no tree clearing wd be required within limits of wetlands or US Waters The power line easement currently has gravel access within the bounds of the easement to provide maintenance access The typical section for the road improvements was limited to a 18 foot width constructed of gravel base rather than a 20 foot width The total pro�ect length is approximately 3 800 Imear feet which is the mirnmum required to connect with existmg installation roads US Waters were identified within the proposed pro�ect area with a US Army Corps of Engineers venfication completed September 2009 Based on additional design evaluations wetlands impacts were further reduced by shifting portions of the alignment southward out of the wetland boundanes The Proposed Action wdl have no impairment or cumulative impacts to any surface waters or impair existing surface water qualiry conditions No urnque habitat or ecosystems wdl be lost due to this action Implementation of the Proposed Action wdl not result in any impacts that wdl reduce environmental productiviry 3 2 Preferred Action The Proposed Action mcludes the construction of a new gravel access road along the alignment of an existing overhead power line easement contairnng an existing gravel road The proposed design wdl upgrade the existing gravel roadway to accommodate the construction of a stable roadway to assist HPDTA in sufficiently meeting all installation secunty standards in accordance with Department of Defense(DOD)requirements as defined within Section 797 or 501 Urnted States Code(U S C)(Section 21 of the Internal Secunty Act of 1950) The power line easement currently has a gravel access road within the bounds of the easement to provide maintenance access The typical section for the road improvements wdl be a 18 foot width constructed of gravel base The total pro�ect length is approximately 3 800 linear feet and the proposed road improvements will connect with existing mstallation roads This alternative meets the reqwrements to adequately address the existing transportation deficienaes with HPDTA as well as mamtam stnct adherence of all HPDTA base secunty reqwrements The only reasonable course of action among the alternatives presented to satisfy the purpose and need is the proposed course of action 4 0 Environmental Impacts Summary Most impacts identified for this pro�ect are short term during the periods of construction activities Implementation of this action wdl result in a minor increase m fuel consumption used by ground based vehicles particularly dunng the construction actiwties and the matenals used in construction Therefore mmor amounts of these nonrenewable resources wdl be irretnevably lost or depleted In addition site preparations wdl mclude the fill of the approximately 0 279 acres of palustrine emergent wetland for the new construction Due to the anticipated total permanent wetland impacts greater than 1/10 of an acre wetland mitigation wdl be required per the requirements as stated m Nationwide Permit 14 It is anticipated that wetland mitigation wdl be purchased from the The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank LLC Based on coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers the wetland mitigation wdl be achieved via a 1 251 mitigation ratio therefore HPDTA wdl be reqwred to purchase 0 348 acres of wetland credits Page 9 of 13 Cons�stency Determmahon For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road The three identified wetland impact areas are due to the mstallation of culverts to provide for more efficient water flow through wetlands however there are either non functiornng or no existmg culverts m place at these locations Properly sized and placed culverts wdl be installed dunng construction All erosion and sediment control measures and practices wdl be stnctly adhered to and all erosion and sediment control measures wdl be m place prior to or as a first step in construction All land disturbed by mobdization/construction access to proJect sites wdl be restored to their onginal pre construction condition Temporary erosion and sediment control measures wdl not be removed untd all disturbed areas upstream of them are stabdized Wetland impacts are kept to the mirnmal extent practicable and for each of the impacted wetland areas within the pro�ect area the disturbed area wdl be kept to the mirnmum necessary required All excavated matenals must be deposited and retained in an upland area Contours wdl be re graded to pre construction conditions as practicable Additionally pro�ect impacts include 50 Imear feet of stream channel characterized as a low drainage swale/drainage ditch with herbaceous vegetation and is generally filled with 5 10 inches of water There is currently a gravel access road which traverses through this location with existing culverts to allow proper water flow and dramage The culverts in this location wdl be replaced as part of general base mamtenance activities since the culvert has been damaged due to continued use as it has aged No tree cleanng wdl be required at this stream location 5 0 Mitigation Due to the anticipated total permanent wetland impacts greater than 1110 of an acre wetland mitigation wdl be required per the requirements as stated m Nationwide Permit 14 It is anticipated that wetland mitigation will be purchased from the The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank LLC Based on coordination with the US Army Corps of Engmeers the wetland mitigation wdl be achieved via a 1251 mitigation ratio therefore HPDTA wdl be required to purchase 0 348 acres of wetland credits 6 0 Areas of Environmental Concern Pursuant to the definitions as stated in The Coastal Area Management Act specifically Article 7 Coastal Area Management§ 113A 113 Areas of environmental concern m general the implementation of the Proposed Action wdl not adversely effect resources designated as Areas of Environmental Concern(AEC) The site preparations wdl mclude the fill of the approximately 0 279 acres of palustrine emergent wetland for the new construction however the identified PEM wetlands that wdl be impacted are of low habitat value due to the limited plant diversity to provide limited wddlife value withm the existmg maintained power line easement 7 0 Pro�ect Conformance with Perquimans County Land Use Plan The property proposed for the Proposed Action is located within the North Carolina coastal zone and are sub�ect to laws and regulations that govern development and changes in land use within Perqwmans County The Perquimans County North Carolina 1998 Land Use Plan Update was prepared in response to CAMA and ratified by the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission This plan establishes land use policies and permittmg processes for the Protection of areas of environmental concern(such as wetlands and pnme farmland) ■ Protection of sigrnficant cultural and historic resources and ■ Adoption of planrnng poliaes along estuary shorelines near population centers and along ma�or transportation routes The Perquimans County land use plan(1998)classifies Harvey Pomt as a government installation and designates the areas around HPDTA as rural agricultural and forested In addition portions of HPDTA occur within areas of the 100 year floodplain as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(Flood Insurance Rate Map North Carolina(panel 7886)) Table 1 mdicates the applicabdity and consistency of the policy to the Proposed Action Page 10 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Act�v�ty Power Lme Access Road Ta61e 1 Perqwmans County(1998)Land Use/Coastal Zone Management Pol►cy Categor�es , , Pursuant to the defirntions as stated m CAMA 1 Areas of Environmental Concern(AEC)and specifically Article 7 Coastal Area Management§ Appropnate Land Use in AECs Mirnmize development 113A 113 in general the implementation of the withm AECs/areas with senous environmental Proposed Action wdl not adversely effect resources constraints desi nated as Areas of Enwronmental Concern The ma�or sod group covenng the Proposed Action 2 Constraints to Development Including Sod site location area is Roanoke sdt loam association In Limitations Flood Prone Areas Hazardous and Fragde general this sod has been altered due to the Land Areas Mmimize development on sods that have construction of the existing power line easement and severe limitations and in floodplains the normal sod profile has been destroyed or covered b radin and/or di in o erations Site preparations mclude the fill of approximately 0 279 acres of PEM wetland for the new const�uction however the identified PEM wetlands are of low 3 Freshwater Swamps and Marshes Encourage Best habitat value due to the limited plant diversity to Management Practices BMPs recommended by the provide limited wddlife value Additionally pro�ect Sod Conservation Service SCS impacts mclude 50 linear feet of stream channel due to the replacement of the existmg culverts in this location Wetland mitigation wdl be included as part of this ro ect 4 Preserve Cultural and Histonc Resources Avoidance of all cultural resources 5 The Use of Package Treatment Plants Department of Health and Division of Environmental Management to Not Applicable control installation placement and operation of acka e treatment lant 6 Protection of Potable Supply Coordinate with Not Applicable Federal and state agencies 7 Storm Water Run off Residential Development All reqwred stormwater permits wdl be obtained pnor Prevent the over burdernng of existing waterways and to all construction activities drama e s stems b excessive surface run-off 8 Marina Floating Home Development and Stack Not Applicable Stora es 9 Industrial Impacts on Fragde Areas Not Applicable .� � � , � 10 Productive Agncultural Lands Encourage land owners to keep their Not Applicable land in roductive use 11 Commercial Forest Land Encourage use of most efficient and productive forest practices Encourage reforestation as an ongoing Not Applicable mana ement ractice 12 Commeraal and Recreational Fishing Not Applicable 13 Off Road Recreational Vehicles Not Applicable 14 Residential Commercial and Industnal Impacts and Resources Not Applicable Source Adapted from 1998 Perquimans County CAMA Plan Update Page 11 of 13 Cons�stency Determmahon For Harvey Pomt Defense Testmg Actrv�ty Power Lme Access Road 8 0 Analysis of Proposed Pro�ect Relative to the North Carolina Coastal Management Program The Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA)of 1972(16 USC 1451 et seq)created a common statutory regime to assist states in comprehensively managing competing uses of and impacts to coastal uses and resources States submit a Coastal Management Program(CMP)to National Ocearnc and Atmosphenc Administration(NOAA) which if approved becomes the basis for Federal agency consistency determinations The state of North Carolma has developed and implemented the federally approved North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA)of 1974 (G S 113A 100 et seq) The CAMA incorporates a legislative framework that provides a cooperative program for coastal area management between local and state governments The Act states that local governments shall have the irntiative for planning whde the state government establishes areas of environmental concern With regard to planning the state government is directed to act pnmardy in a supportive standard setting and review capaaty except m situations where local governments do not elect to exerase their mitiative In addition the CAMA establishes the Coastal Resource Commission(CRC)withm the North Carolma Department of Environment and Natural Resources whose duties include approval of Coastal Habitat Protection Plans and designation of Areas of Environmental Concern(AEC) The CAMA classifies areas of environmental concern to protect them from uncontrolled development which may cause irreversible damage to property public health or the environment After designation of these areas the CRC is responsible for issuing all permits providing mput in planrnng decisions in AEC and involved in policy direction undertaken by local governments In accordance with Section 307(c)(1)of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended HPDTA has determined that the Proposed Action is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with all enforceable poliaes of North Carolina s approved Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA)program This determination is based on the review of the pro�ect s conformance with the Chapter 7 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Admirnstrative Code the North Carolina Division of Water Quality the No►th Carolina Manne Fishenes Service the U S Army Corps of Engmeers and the Perqwmans County(1998)Land Use/Coastal Zone Management Policy Categones In addition in a letter dated May 7 2007 the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management found that Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 for which this pro�ect meets all requirements for is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program The pro�ect has been designed to be undertaken in a manner consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable poliaes of the NC Coastal Management Program 9 0 Conclus�on The Harvey Pomt Defense Testing Activity is proposmg the const�uction of a new gravel access road along the alignment of an existmg overhead power line easement contammg an existing gravel road The proposed design wdl upgrade the existing gravel roadway to accommodate the construction of a stable roadway to assist HPDTA in su�ciently meeting all installation security standards m accordance with DOD requirements as defined within Section 797 or 501 (U S C)(Section 21 of the Internal Secunty Act of 1950) In accordance with Section 307(c)(1)of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended HPDTA has determmed that the Proposed Action is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with all enforceable poliaes of North Carolma s approved Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA)program This determmation is based on the review of the pro�ect s conformance with the Chapter 7 of T�tle 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code the North Carolina Division of Water Quality the North Carolma Marine Fisheries Service the U S Army Corps of Engmeers and the Perquimans County(1998) Land Use/Coastal Zone Management Policy Categories This proposed pro�ect wdl not result in any significant impacts to coastal resources or coastal uses The pro�ect wdl not result m the loss of or impacts to estuarine waters and wdl not impact coastal resources or prohibit access to coastal resources by the public The pro�ect site does not currently provide urnque habitat conditions that support threatened or endangered native flora and fauna The pro�ect wdl have no adverse impacts on any state or federal listed species Site preparations wdl include the fill of the approximately 0 279 acres of palustnne emergent wetland for the new construction however the identified PEM wetlands that wdl be impacted are of low habitat value due to Page 12 of 13 Cons�stency Determmat�on For Harvey Pomt Defense Teshng Achv�ty Power Lme Access Road the limited plant diversity to provide limited wddlife value Additionally pro�ect impacts include 50 linear feet of stream channel due to the replacement of the existmg culverts in this location Due to the anticipated total permanent wetland impacts greater than 1110 of an acre wetland mitigation wdl be required per the reqwrements as stated m Nationwide Permit 14 It is anticipated that wetland mitigation wdl be purchased from the The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank LLC Based on coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers the wetiand mitigation will be achieved via a 1 251 mitigation ratio therefore HPDTA wdl be reqwred to purchase 0 348 acres of wetland credits LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicirnty Map Figure 2 Pro�ect Overview Map Design Plans Wetland Impact Area—Design Plans Page 13 of 13 Prmt Form WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region Pro�ecvs�te HPDTA Security AN Gravel Road C�ty/County Perquimans Sampling Date 2009 08 26 a,PPi�car,vowr,er Hanrey Point Defense Testing Activity State NC Sampling Point Wetle�d 2 in�est�9ator�s� Claudette L Jenkins Ph D Section Township Range H2rtfO�d Landform(hdlslope cerrace ecc� Coastal plain Local relief(concave convex none) NO�e Slope(/) �2 Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR �at 66 6 30 N �on9 76 20 30 W Datum NAD83 Sod Map Unit Name R08flOke NWI classification PEM Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes � No � (If no explam in Remarks) Are Vegetation 0 Sod � or Hydrology �significantly disturbed� Are Normal C�rcumstances present� Yes � No ❑ Are Vegetation � Sod � or Hydrology �naturally problematic� (If needed explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes � No � Is the Sampled Area Hydnc Sod Present� Yes 0 No ❑ � ❑ within a Wetland� Yes � No Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes ❑X No Remarks The field investigation for this data has been observation has been performed in accordance with the policies and procedures of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Techrncal Report Y 87 1 dated January 1987 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Pnmarv Indicators(mirnmum of one is reawred,check all that ao�lvl � Surface Sod Cracks(B6) a Surface Water(A1) ❑X Water Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) a High Water Table(A2) T❑1 Aquatic Fauna(B13) T❑1 Drainage Pattems(B10) � Saturation(A3) u Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) u Moss Tnm Lines(616) � Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Suifide Odor(C1) Dry Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) � Ox�dized Rhizospheres on Liwng Roots(C3) � Cra�sh Burrows(C8) [� Dnft Deposits(B3) � Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) � Saturation V�sible on Aenal Imagery(C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Sods(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) � Iron Deposits(B5) ��R Thm Muck Surface(C7) � Shallow Aquitard(D3) g Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) LJ Other(Explam in Remarks) � FAC Neutral Test(D5) Field Observat�ons Surface Water Present� Yes � No � Depth(inches) �2 Water Tabte Present� Yes � No ❑ Depth(inches) � Saturation Present� Yes ❑X No ❑ Depth(inches) 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No � includes ca illa fnn e Descnbe Recorded Data(stream gauge morntonng well aenal photos previous mspections) if avadable Aenal Photographs Inundated natural wetland which drams towards the main gate US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Intenm Version VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WetlBfld 2 Absolute Dominant Indicator pommance Test worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size ) / Cover Soeaes� Status Number of Dominant Speaes 1 ❑ That Are OBL FACW or FAC �2 (A) 2 ❑ Total Number of Dominant 3 � Species Across All Strata �2 (B) 4 ❑ Percent of Dommant Speaes o 5 ❑ That Are OBL FACW or FAC 100/o �,q�g� 6 ❑ � � Prevalence Index worksheet =Total Cover Total / Cover of Multiplv bv Saohn4 Stratum (Plot srze ) OBL species 8 x 1 = 8 i Acer rubrum(Red maple) � FAC FACW speaes 2 x 2= 4 2 Betula rngra (River birch) � FACW FAC species 2 x s= 6 3 ❑ FACU species 0 x 4= � 4 ❑ UPL species � x 5= 0 5 ❑ Column Totals �2 (A) �8 (B) 6 ❑ � � Prevalence Index =B/A= � 5 �5% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators =Total Cover Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) X Dominance Test is>50/ � Mynca cenfera (Wax myrtle) ❑ FAC X Prevalence Index is<_3 0' 2 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 'Indicators of hydnc sod and weUand hydrology must 5 � be present unless disturbed or problematic 6 ❑ Defirntions of Vegetation Strata 7 ❑ 5p�o Tree—Woody plants exciuding woody vmes =Total Cover approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more�n height and 3 m Herb Stratum (Plot size ) (7 6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH) � Juncus effuses(Soft rush) 0 FAC�j 2 Lemmna spp (Common duckweed) 0 OBL Sapling—Woody plants excluding woody wnes approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less 3 Scirpus cypermus(Woolgrass) ❑ FACV� than 3 in (7 6 cm)DBH 4 Typha latifolia (Narrow leaf cattail) 0 OBL 5 Saururus cemuus(Lizard s tad) Q OBL Shrub—Woody plants excluding woody vines approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height g Peltandra virgmica (Arrow arum) � OBL Pontedena cordata Pickerleweed OBL Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants including 7 � � ❑ herbaceous vines regardless of size Includes woody 8 Polygonum sagittatum (Arrow tearthumb) �x OBL plants except woody vmes less than approximately 9 Polygonum amphibium (Smartweed) 0 OBL 3 ft(1 m)in height �p ❑ Woody vine—All woody vines regardless of height 11 ❑ 12 0 80% =Total Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 5 � Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ =Total Cover Present? Yes ❑x No Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below) Natural wetland—no gravel access road within the power line easement US Army Corps of Engineers AUantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region—Intenm Version SOIL Sampling Point Wetle�d 2 Profile Descnption (Describe to the depth needed to document the mdicator or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matnx Redox Features (inches) Color(moistl / Color(moist) �_ Tvae Loc Texture Remarks 0 18 10 YR 4/1 90 10 YR 5/6 10 RM M Clay loam (easemenUculverts) 'T e C=Concentration D=De letion RM=Reduced Matnx CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Lirnn M=Matnx �H dric Sod Ind�cators Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods' Histosol(A1) OPolyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) D 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O) Q Histic Epipedon(A2) �Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) ,Q 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S) � Black Hist�c(A3) �Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) � Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) �Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Sods(F19)(LRR P S T) Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) � Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods(F20) Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) �Depleted Dark Surface(F7) � Red Parent Matenal(TF2) � Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) �Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)(LRR T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) Marl(F10)(LRR U) � Other(Explain in Remarks) � Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) �Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151) a Thick Dark Surface(Al2) �Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O P T) 3lndicators of hydrophyhc vegetation and a Coast Prame Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) �Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present a Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O S) Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic Q, Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) �Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 1506) a Sandy Redox(S5) �Piedmont Floodplain Sods(F19)(MLRA 149A) Q Stnpped Matnx(S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D) Q Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U) Restrictrve Layer(if observed) Type Depth(inches) Hydric Sod Present? Yes � No � Soils are considered hydric US Army Corps of Eng�neers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Intenm Version Prmt Form WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region Pro�ecus�ce HPDTA Secunty ATV Gravel Road c�ty�county Perqwmans Sampling Date 2009 08 26 appi�canUOwner Harvey Point Defense Testmg Activity State NC Sampling Point Wetland 3 invest�gator(s) Claudette L Jenkins Ph D Section Township Range HertfO�d Landform(hdlslope teRace etc� Coastal plain Local relief(concave convex none) NOne Slope(/) �2 Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR �at 66 6 30 N �ong 76 20 30 W Datum NAD83 Sod Map Urnt Name ROanOke NWI classification PEM Are climatic/hydrolog�c conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes � No � (If no explam m Remarks) Are Vegetation � Sod � or Hydrology �significantly disturbed� Are Normal Circumstances present� Yes 0 No � Are Vegetation � Sod � or Hydrology �naturally problematic� (If needed explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes � No � ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydnc Sod Present� Yes X ❑ No � Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes � No ❑ W�thm a Wetland9 Yes x Remarks The field mvestigation for this data has been observation has been performed in accordance with the policies and procedures of the 1987 Corps of Engmeers Wetlands Delineation Manual Techrncal Report Y 87 1 dated January 1987 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators(mirnmum of two reawred) Pnmarv Indicators(m�nimum of one is reau�red,check all that ao�lvl ❑ Surface Sod Cracks(B6) a Surface Water(A1) ❑X Water Stained Leaves(69) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑ High Water Table(A2) T❑1 Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ Drainage Pattems(B10) 0 Saturation(A3) u Marl Deposits(615)(LRR U) � Moss Tnm Lmes(616) � Water Marks(61) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) � Dry Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Liwng Roots(C3) Cra�sh BuROws(C8) x� Dnft Deposits(63) � Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) � Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9) � Algal Mat or Crust(B4) T� Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Sods(C6) F� Geomorphic Position(D2) � Iron Deposits(B5) 1J Thin Muck Surface(C7) LJ Shallow Aquitard(D3) 0 Inundat�on Visible on Aenal Imagery(67) � Other(Explain in Remarks) � FAC Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations Surface Water Present� Yes � No � Depth(inches) 4 Water Table Present� Yes � No ❑ Depth(mches) � Saturation Present� Yes � No ❑ Depth(inches) � Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No � includes ca dla fin e Descnbe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitonng well aenal photos prewous inspections) if avadable Aenal Photographs Inundated naturai dramage(gravel access) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Intenm Version VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point Wetl811d 3 Absolute Dominant Indicator pommance Test worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size ) / Cover Species� Status Number of Dominant Species 1 � That Are OBL FACW or FAC 6 (A) 2 ❑ Total Number of Dommant 3 � Speaes Across All Strata 6 (B) 4 0 Percent of Dominant Speaes o 5 � That Are OBL FACW or FAC ��/o (A/B) 6 ❑ � � Prevalence Index worksheet =Total Cover Total / Cover of Multiplv bv Saolmq Stratum (Plot size ) OBL speaes 3 x� = 3 1 0 FACW species � x 2= 2 2 � FAC speaes 2 x 3= 6 3 ❑ FACU speaes � x 4= � 4 ❑ UPL species � x 5= � 5 ❑ Column Totals 6 �q� 11 �B� 6 ❑ � � Prevalence Index =B/A= 1 83 Hydrophytic Vegetat�on Ind�cators =Total Cover Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) X Dominance Test is>50/ � Mynca cenfera (Wax myrtle) ❑ FAC X Prevalence Index is 53 0' 2 ❑ Problematic HydrophyGc Vegetation'(Explam) 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must 5 � be present unless disturbed or problematic 6 � Defimtions of Vegetation Strata 7 0 5% Tree—Woody plants excluding woody wnes =Total Cover approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more m height and 3 m Herb Stratum (Plot size ) (7 6 cm)or larger m diameter at breast height(DBH) � Juncus effuses(Soft rush) � FAC�j 2 Scirpus cypennus(Woolgrass) 0 OBL Sapling—Woody plants excluding woody wnes approx�mately 20 ft(6 m)or more m height and less 3 Polygonum amphibwm (Smartweed) ❑ OBL than 3 in (7 6 cm)DBH 4 Typha latifolia (Narrow leaf cattail) Ox OBL 5 Microstegwm vimineum(Microstegium) � FAC Shrub—Woody plants excluding woody vmes approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height 6 � Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants including 7 � herbaceous wnes regardless of size Includes woody 8 Q plants except woody vines less than approximately 9 � 3 ft(1 m)in height �p ❑ Woody vme—All woody vines regardless of height 11 ❑ 12 ❑ 95% =Total Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 � 2 0 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 5 � Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ =Total Cover Present? Yes ❑x No Remarks (If obsenred list morphological adaptations below) This area already has a gravel access road that traverse the wetland (no culvert in place) however it is generally inundated and has not been maintained US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Intenm Version SOIL Sampl�ng Point WetlB►1d 3 Pro�le Descnption (Describe to the depth needed to document the mdicator or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matnx Redox Features Smches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Tv�e Loc Texture Remarks 0 4 Gravel (easement) 4 18 10 YR 5/1 90 10 YR 5/6 10 RM M Clay loam (easement) 'T e C=Concentration D=De letion RM=Reduced Matnx CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Lmin M=Matnx �H dric Sod Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods' Histosol(A1) OPolyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) � 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O) Q Histic Epipedon(A2) �Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) � 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S) � Black Histic(A3) �Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) � Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) �Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) � Piedmont Floodplam Sods(F19)(LRR P S � Stratified Layers(A5) �Depleted Matnx(F3) � Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils(F20) Orgarnc Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) �Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Matenal(TF2) � Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) �Redox Depressions(F8) � Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)(LRR T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P � -{n-�Marl(F10)(LRR U) � Other(Explain in Remarks) a Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) uDepleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151) a Thick Dark Surface(Al2) �iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and a Coast Prame Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) �Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present a Sandy Mucky Mmeral(S1)(LRR O S) Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic a Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) �Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 1508) � Sandy Redox(S5) �Piedmont Floodplain Sods(F19)(MLRA 149A) Stnpped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D) a Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U) Restrictrve Layer(if observed) Type a Depth(inches) Hydric Sod Present? Yes � No Soils are considered hydric c US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Intenm Version Prmt Form WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Pro�ecvs�te HPDTA Secunty AN Gravel Road acyicounty Perqwmans Samplmg Date 2009 08 26 appi�canvowner Harvey Point Defense Testing Activity State NC Samplmg Pomt Wetl811d 4 �nvest�9ator(s) Claudette L Jenkins Ph D Section Township Range HBrtfO�d Landform(hdlslope terrace etc) Coastal pla�n Local relief(concave convex none) NOne Slope(/) �2 Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR �at 66 6 30 N �ong 76 20 30 W Datum NAD83 Sod Map Unit Name R02nOke NWI classification PEM Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes � No � (If no explam in Remarks) Are Vegetation 0 Sod � or Hydrology �sigrnficantly disturbed� Are Normal Circumstances present� Yes � No ❑ Are Vegetation 0 Sod � or Hydrology �naturally problematic� (If needed explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes � No � Is the Sampled Area Hydric Sod Present� Yes X ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes � No ❑ W�thm a Wetland? Yes � No � Remarks The field investigation for this data has been observation has been performed m accordance with the policies and procedures of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Techrncal Report Y 87 1 dated January 1987 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Seconda[v Indicators(mirnmum of two reauiredl Pnmarv Indicators(mmimum of one is reawred.check all that aoalvl ❑ Surface Sod Cracks(B6) a Surface Water(A1) � Water Stained Leaves(B9) � Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) a High Water Table(A2) T❑1 Aquatic Fauna(613) ❑ Dramage Patterns(B10) 0 Saturation(A3) u Marl Depos�ts(B15)(LRR U) � Moss Tnm Lines(B16) a Water Marks(61) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) � Dry Season Water Table(C2) aSediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Liwng Roots(C3) Cra�sh Burrows(C8) x� Dnft Deposits(63) � Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) � Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(64) �1 Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Sods(C6) F� Geomorphic Position(D2) � Iron Deposits(B5) �LJi Thin Muck Surface(C7) LJ Shallow Aquitard(D3) C�, Inundation Visible on Aenai imagery(B7) LJ Other(Explam in Remarks) � FAC Neutrai Test(D5) Field Observations Surface Water Present� Yes 0 No � Depth(inches) 4 Water Table Present� Yes 0 No � Depth(inches) 0 Saturation Present� Yes � No � Depth(mches) � Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No � includes ca dla fnn e Descnbe Recorded Data(stream gauge morntonng well aenal photos previous inspections) if avadable Aerial Photographs Inundated natural wetland drainage(uppermost reach of drainage channel) US Army Corps of Engmeers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Intenm Version VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Samplmg Point Wetland 4 Absoiute Dominant Ind�cator pominance Test worksheet Tree Stratum (Piot size ) / Cover S�eaes� Status Number of Dominant Speaes 1 0 That Are OBL FACW or FAC 6 (A) 2 ❑ Total Number of Dominant 3 � Species Across All Strata 6 (B) 4 ❑ Percent of Dominant Speaes o 5 0 That Are OBL FACW or FAC 100/o �p�g) 6 0 � a Prevalence Index worlcsheet =Total Cover Total / Cover of Multiolv bv Sa�lin4 Stratum (Plot size ) OBL speaes 3 x� = 3 1 ❑ FACW speaes � x 2= 2 Z Q FAC species 2 x 3= 6 3 � FACU species � x 4= � 4 � UPL species 0 x 5= 0 5 ❑ Coiumn Totals 6 �q� 11 �g� 6 ❑ � � Prevalence Index =B/A= 1 83 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators =Total Cover Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) X Dommance Test is>50/ i Mynca cenfera (Wax myrtle) ❑ FAC X Prevalence index is<_3 0' 2 Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 3 0 q ❑ 'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must 5 � be present unless disturbed or problematic 6 ❑ Defimtions of Vegetation Strata � 5% a Tree-Woody plants excluding woody wnes =Total Cover approximately 20 R(6 m)or more in height and 3 in Herb Stratum (Plot size ) (7 6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH) � Juncus effuses(Soft rush) � FAC�J 2 Scirpus cyperinus(Woolgrass) Q OBL Sapling-Woody plants excludmg woody vines approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more m height and less 3 Polygonum amphibium (Smartweed) 0 OBL than 3 in (7 6 cm)DBH 4 Typha latifolia (Narrow leaf cattad) �x OBL Microste wm vimmeum Microste wm FAC Shrub-Woody plants excluding woody wnes 5 9 ( 9 � ❑ approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height 6 � Herb-All herbaceous(non woody)plants mcluding 7 ❑ herbaceous vines regardless of size Includes woody 8 � plants except woody wnes less than approximately 9 a 3 ft(1 m)in height �p Q Woody vine-All woody vines regardless of height 11 � ,2 a 95% =Total Cover Woodv Vme Stratum (Plot size ) 1 0 2 a 3 0 4 � 5 � Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ =Total Cover Present? Yes ❑x No Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below) This area already has a gravel access road that traverse the wetland (no in place culvert) This area is a small approximately 30 square foot wetland area within the easement and drains towards the nver side of the installation This are is the uppermost reach of a dramage channel US Army Corps of Engineers AUantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region-Intenm Version SOIL Sampling Point:Wetl2fld 4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Jinchesl Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 Gravel (easement) 4- 18 10 YR 4/1 90 10 YR 5/6 10 RM M Clay loam (easement) 'T e: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix. �H dric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) T��Polyvalue Below Surface(SS)(LRR S,T,U) � 1 cm Muck{A9)(LRR 0) Q Histic Epipedon(A2) uThin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) � 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S) � Black Histic(A3) �Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) � Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 750A,6) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) �Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T) Stratified Layers(A5) �Depleted Matrix(F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20) Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) �Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2) � Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) �Redox Depressions(F8) � Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)(LRR T,U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) Marl(F10)(LRR U) � Other(Explain in Remarks) a Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) �Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) a Thick Dark Surface(Al2) �Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and a Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) �Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present, a Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. a Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) �Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B) a Sandy Redox(S5) �Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A) Q Stripped Matrix(S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D) a Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U) Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No � Soils are considered hydric. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Interim Version I HPDTA Power Line Easement Project Site Photos Stream Impact(location of existing culverts) (refer to attached Jurisdictional Wetland Impact Design Sheets for additional information) „ �, � I f� i ,: � �� - Z� -�� t � ��.:. ;. .� � =;E, s: :�� Wetland 2: Palustrine Emergent Wetland (PEM) (refer to attached Jurisdictional Wetland Impact Design Sheets for additional information) -' `i ��.�` '�,t '+� � '.s�,, •,*_ ::— I Y�t� � � ��. {i:r ��'� -�� .yji �f � . �; ;�. S � �' ' � ~-,.+- �:: � �:1+F4 `� 4 � ~ E i�w-: °� �� '� I -, � November 2011 HPDTA Power Line Easement Pro'ect Site Photos 1 Wetland 3: Palustrine Emergent Wetland (PEM) (refer to attached Jurisdictional Wetland Impact Design Sheets for additional information) ";� �', �t,`? Wetland 4: Palustrine Emergent Wetland (PEM) (refer to attached Jurisdictional Wetland Impact Design Sheets for additional information) S� "{' �f�° •�.� :, -� 3'' R,.1 - r ��S� � . �+�M�` ,��i• �11 - •Y! J ��, . s� �: � �'�'.� ��y�� - ' � � ;, �`-t�.7;kt"'��f .�., � ' �i_ t�y}�'�� 1 + ��• � ro�� ;� � � .. . � . f 1�S _4� 1� fi t 'r� x . .� � i � ' �, a . .. '�ta� t I�'�' k� �r.�� ` t ` .� e 1 a, . �-. ' ;1�� - %�:_� ` ;j +y,r� � . - �: �.- . '- :,,., -. _.. ._ . . . - - ' e .�-'- .�� . . -., -. ., -r � :. . � r `�?�",5�. �; - ..' ; ��`. �_./� _'!�-` �.._, � 4 '"!�'�� ' �y_` . ,is.�. . . . . � . . �. I � .. `�1°� ' r�� +SY:}� .r `,`��%�`a November 2011 � - - T6e Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC P. O. Box 6186 Phone(757) 487-3441 Chesapeake,VA 23323 Fax (757) 487-8680 November 16, 2011 Ms. Claudette Twichell . Solstice Environmentai, LLC. 800 Sandoval Drive Virginfa Beach, VA 23454 RE: Power Line Easement Road � Dear Ms.Twichell: The following price quote is given in reply to your request for the purchase of 0.348 wetland mitigation credits (HUC Code 03010205) from The Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank Timberlake Farm. These credits are cu�rently avallable from our Timberlake mttigation bank. The cost will be Six Thousand, Nine Hundred, Sixty Dollars ($ 6,960.00). This quote will expire on January 31, 2012. You will need to submit to the USCOE the necessary application for said mitigation, and receive USCOE permission to furnish said requi�ed credits from our Timberlake bank. To complete this transaction,we will require payment in full. Once payment is received,the credit sale will be reported to the US Army Corps of Engineers. Please provide and/or confirm the following information: Corps Project#: Watervvay: Permittee Name: Locality of Impact: Permit action (i.e., IP, NWP-39, enforcement, etc.) Impacts(acres/linear feet): Impacts NWI classification: Impacts Hydrotogic Unit Code: 03010205 Thank you for allowing us to quote on this project. We look fonroard to working with you. 'ncerely, Beverly . hite � GDSRB A ounting CC: File I /r '-�s Z � W,Ylr/ L:�ti'`4tr ' . ;'�a� ' � I � ' �"-�' � 'f al. �u �y ''� 1 .�i �� > � ��` ��, ^_�J�� $ � I t � � �� ` ��J ,�_�- �, -___� `�� ,,^ 1� ' '��f i ��, 1. � � ( � � �.y - ! � f ' �. �' �;:---, � � f� ' '�, �� " ,� - � ;��"+`!�"' - ;— �� s+ # � r{_� � `; :�� ,, o : T� � _ -- - ,;� , —_, : �_ � '_ �� -, � � � a � - t_- �� , � -�-,, a } ��.- r i� '� ¢ � . ! �� ;'-.,` ��" �.��. — —li [.. ] { t r i ��r�y --- '� } i d R 1 - C� d � � . ��."" j'� y�a ` 0--- I x t � f -� ` � �--�f � 3�1 �� ' ' � � �=. ,�—. J �y . , fi I �f ._.�� /''r.�'��e ��;��..,n I;. �u �� ? �7-i��'_��, .�'{ � ' � �J .� I' � �� ? $�° 1,��'�� " � � � Q �NY71hy�_� _ 1 ' � ��.-,� � ;:�,i;', : ? � v �� I �, �' 9 = � r' �'` r-� �4�A� �� _-�.- -- - , � ,�. Y,i . Y `e`'`� �� $%�� ,� J�,rf �8 � ! �� ,'� � �_ ,�� 1 - .9 � f� .i,x /p� + (� , , c � �5 J: �` `.�� - -. ` �-�.r- rJ�-i( j'` ' �� P + � a � � �e�` � - i l. ' - - C J �" � 'S` � s C.i /�Q�a �\\. - � ��'' � �€ �1r - _� �\ fi �� C � , °-" ±ti � �" '� ( —- -`�_— _ : � -� -- � �' --- r- -i l� __ I h � F _ ,4 � � �+. r' �'- .-1 �l 1 �f� ' I � � � ��$ �"� �,.�� U "� , ,t � S �y � ' - � �OP I L—�. � � ! - ,�� '- j _-'��-- t� � � � _ •, ,�- �1 � �� -_ � '� > ' 1 �-�� -f��r, - � � �' ',�� •.:, ' �' � � �r_' � � --�" '�� ti` . �� - � l' �� y�� '.4• � j1�Y ' ` �{ y�- i � \ z � � . - \ :� ��` J" / ` I �.� F, � �i r � - •,%�, -- - �.� „ - 4� � � "�). -- ' -.',_,.-__ , - ,a � � - � , i � , � -�, - �- � --- r, =r--_ ' ' �1 _ - � � � q r, I � �- � � !, � � f � a �'�� ! � �i, � � �� ;' 1 � � �l - - -�7 _ I � , -�� y�---� � � T � � �� :. � � , _ � . : - T_ .._ -�+— -- S � t � ' _ �' � — � � __ . �i ; �i +f _ � Cd 4, r'J \\ _ f i=-��,'- J�� ;. -�-'�_-. I�cxaau+ '�P 1 � �. � I -- ao �--=_" , _�,,, .�"� - � � � I'' � g ,o I - ! ', � �� ) �` ( �_� C �.y- r - �_.-y-. a a Vj I� � ,� i . i:i+� �, - �� Z � � � '+ � '`7 ' �r;�/'�"'-- 0 O �i \..,._ r i-- -- . �%� Z � i_ �� v: '�. t ii � �., � � �I , f 'R � _ _ � � y �;�,` w ,V � � ,`, !. -y: �,•�� C h ��{� � .� w � -- . t. / �,� I�. (�� A i � �0 � a V ' � � � ' � � N � � $ . i Fi_ _:t � � ' I ,o` . � � J_ i r ` �� A i Q H � s, � � � � � 1� a � � � i " pf 't ' � '�J � 4 � - 'i _- _ I . �1 � � � � � � . ,� { I = � i > I, � . ' `� z ' � . ,� } _ � ;�� , � , ' `� 0. � . �� '`��, `� j �� ` ' � � .�� ♦-,�.° � � � � ' � . ' � a � � �:. i � t ., ~� �,, � �,,° , � . 'r� e�9,� }�I'�t �� 1 ��.�'.�` � . L! , � �,�5 ,. � � ;� _ �;3��.� .. � I �f'� � � �' • '� � ��3t�� .�� `� � � � '� �I � � � `: ''�4 �� ;� � ' ��. ,�, ,� `,t.� ' 1 .?:�. - :µ _ � ; ;Y��`�' ' � °!rs .F�' _ �/ 4 .`7►= ,��r - r, .i ��f 1 5 �. 1� _ ��' � � E, �" - �� i # . � �' ` � � "li� �: - . � � �� -�- �� { � �►, � � � � a.� .,r - :: �� , . . � : �� ' `;� t., - ,' ,� � 3 ., �: . •. � � + '? ' �i �_-C�N�. / '� - � �*:�}. � . � ,",�: •{� 7R � y �� . . �i�r.#- 4_.,�, � � � [ `4= , .L ! � ■ � '� �� . . . � . .�' ... ��" � �^}y . �� ° '�� 1��t��r� �� `�� F�I I ' Y ,.�..t� ��. .��'. � � I� � .�.� R; ,�i ' � �o `��, - - � c - �' ``� � � �`;'i �i `x' �' a , � .. _,;,,�, � � -' � � � � � � .;� � � �� . � �+ � ' s' r � 1 i '-� `, _:> � � ,, s ; � - -�i�/`ry. / � i�.� + _ �' � °'A '�'�t� �� . � � 3 '� �k�� t. ..P2S� .'; O.i } _ _ i �,1��, ��•� �� '. '''�� t' ( vE l - i Qi � -.. �"ra�r - _ f,f' .rC'.�� , " � � � L • � x �++ �"°- e' �L � , � �,t:�� ' � "�'� J� M4� i .s�.� �y I --r'- Y' '�� `* ��. li�'.�� '� ` w _ . ,� a�e .� ..��, � N R � � "�� ew�o�a� 4NoN `P�1NaH �� ;o„ � ��`" �� Psoa ssa��y aui� aaMOd �o o� � � 0 o�ne••�i�naeow�zen `�' � �od'�nu-x�oo►uo� �}�ni}�y Bui}sal asua;aa �uiod �(anaBH �w N� N II�I � �Z� l. � ��i� a�� u o � f� g � � � ��p�(7 �3 < ��56 �o tl� � s � 8 H H °�� . YB�m�'e�� ! �o � a � _ kl� W E $�Vi� . �� •4il c�i'"'?raQ � W 4 �' � � m � ��V M a(J� � � `��! 3=&w'w ° �u t� - o �b � �� J j .-��w`y�.W � �� _� b �� ao� b a i �9 �i � t + =ka`�a>� W � b; W �Q �u� � or � � ��a � � � ��a�� _� �N �� N �_� w °_ � ��Q g�� l` � ' �a� �g��s:�� m; �� =a�o; _� � g ` �� -?�� =��=ak� �� m oo ?�� __ � � _ �� '�� a s<��, _ �a8o�o�:�=�W<g = a � � m � � =E �8=�°<°: < aa >$ ��opppw��o;�= � �m g � "° W �� , ( � �`a:`•b� �& oc ��E`W'��'o��madw� ° d� m� S � W��5��U R I ` '��€� � o� �°k��aoo_�°g;'" S '� �� e < � ' �!� e � 1 IS� ��Na�e° � g;� �_ � =�a�a��=p�� s �� p a o_ w o 0 0°� �� 1 �zzz i}� � 2jMI � e a gg<WOw o a� g� d�x�°�°<«<W��g ' � �� p= X Q Q 6 p�i� ��1 i �1 I ! W�o=° �- a �= o� � �a�=k€a<WWO=�=� � o�� ' � �� W��g� �� ld� °aW p°��a � � a< �=�w=��m'�`oa�= � � ao p p � � � � .W w �s W � VY u z � a�m€y�a � �° b�W��rg zs<�p pw� � ��3 �� o ` U a U W W �°e.,o . ba a �'�o o � � �b; . � W mw �m"<�pW's��"go6� � �� "�< � � W �� =oo:az"�y° < a�N �� w��sw�s`a�.� : as� x�� y � W o�w o 0 0� ��a��s � �=o W> _�.,.�e,.,�a _ __ w � _r a _� � ¢� ��c�c`i c�'i� � � o � i a , � � j � � � � - �-,` ' ° �, � � � � � � � � �� ...:�� 000�o !� g � � ; g ,, i I � l � � 9 : � r, p µ e al l �� # T¢� � � _ ;� ,>� , N - � �'- �� y, :- � � � .,�t��v" U I � /��\� ��= _ ��' � ,,c�, �� - � ��. - —, .:r.� �--t � � � � '' \ � T_ �{ � � � � : ' ' � - � :�� !�� , ,-�, �, �-�,a,.�r,— �, � � � �.�,��... �,��,. ��< � Q � , � .� � ='�,. �� I � � � � u � I fA � �'~� � � � W � � a � � � U � � � � �- �a�� Z Q Y I Q, � o ; � � � � f � � �� I w � � � .- __ �. � .;a . �, ��o� � Q i Z � �` � J F- � I z W U y a r �aN`� � o ¢ ° _ � ��52�� , o � ! � � Z � ' _�,��, ;� ,� � a c�a6 3 W 0 0 0 � � � �` I � ; � � � ¢ � r � � � � � °� � _ � � a � �� . _ � T � � ��b� w ►�� sugoa8�4�N `P�o1NaH o� V �t ;o m � ��,�,r PBOy ssa��d aw� �annod �o o�# W�„ ^�; `' °°'��.�1"'""°'''�" i� 6ui a aeua a wo �(anaa �w� �� h ��d�ru�o�Fuo� �.� t/ � 1 � Q 3 . d H _ � � - ——--- , , 'y '� _ _ , �� ao.8 ��_ bi9n I �� ' j �i 00'' S 1Atl �L 9 i� I � � YI \ ��'''' ' I ' '��1 � � N � �'•8 LL90 � I � I j I '�. \ — 1 � I , � I `\� / j � � � sZ''n OO�r 1 \\ / i i I i I d SZ�9 I � \\\� �e i 1 � \ { 1 t I ;E ' _ ( � `;;�� , , r i; ; _____ �9s , �o � '� I ' ' � � ; ��; � � � I I �� I � �WS i � I �t o�, i t � i� 1 a-9 � �i N.� { �� I �i r 7 i � � �9� 999 � �.8 i > � � = d � i�i � � � i i rc�ao � _ i�� i � i � �� ,�� s � . � �� «s ' � � ,'� � e � � , � � � , � e � � � � ' � � �.a ' ` �"9_ � ]�e 1 � �� I �i �/ �� 1, [l♦ � €' I _ I I II � % �• 2 C�9 � �� I �P 1 g \ I ` � 3i.8 , J - , � � � I I 1� i �• I - � � �; I � a �S 9 ` 1 �) � \ I \ I \ o � �� I � f! m \\` t ` ,g \ '' il ' Z CL \` - n ` i 3 � \ 1I� � i � tne Gfi• 'OS��'Y I 5�9 � ( �f 1 �I I � � I L958 I � OpOp��lvl5 He 8 09'9i � �D�I � I 1� �I ' ; .,. �_�� d W9 �1' f9'9 L t f1 t I � pa'g 8 ` 9'9 n !I t� I I �I I � I ` ��_ 0 9 I a� I11 I _ 1 � + W90 �` I I �� V! 1 I ,.�3, -_____ ' �� 1 I I I ' � W9 I� � � 9 :w�T � � J �; � � \\� OOSL 9��v 5 NE I I I� i i .. 4 oo�y 8 j a'. � i � ao�oo.uri " e�s_ � �e� � svsn>> D oasc+aiv s�e i ~�Sa 00 9 �x G6'9 I $ I \ / 2L'[S ;n I I � � R �; li� �II li I , �i i i% i � ��' ;i� � i�I � � _ ��' �ii _ i�; � _ i�� ;�i ii; �� " �i I '�i lii o�� j�l , � �. \ a li� �i� . I � �i- .. �i I �0 I � O �` \,�.�.`` II' ,�I � '� i�' !,i i I ,' „`� j��'I � R U, ��i . . �� i r� i�l I � a �I� ��I i I� � �I _. I __ ._ _ .._ _. . ._.'._ � I - � � I G � I ° `��' I � k'\ `\ � � � I I - - y� p�I �� I 1 I I I � _____-__�� I I i � I � � J I I { � � __�` - � 11 �\ e.o0 °- � 1 I � I �1 � � � r/ I i � �� I 1 I A I i � � � �I �j �f I I I I - '�'8.3) m { I I � � � i� g..ao �i i � �.i i r �i i� � � g i�� i i� �i i � � i � i �� i i i � i � i i � � o.^ i i ; �� ' � i ' i i 4 � � .� � �i ; ' � ii i i i i � i � � � i i ' i i i � i i i � �6.16 � � � I I I II I I � � � i i O ` � ' I I I I I� I11� I � I N I n oa� I � � i i I i ¢ � o s�vs � f� �i �i �i � `i li I�i I� r I I i r f � ' li i I � � i $` � i !_____'__ RF° ii i �i e. i � i �I o 3 ;e.so i ��i , �A i�i i i y IU�' o i I >°' � i � � o s.00 � i r � $ i �' R� i r �, � � +ti i � ' i � � o � -------' '� � i , m � j'_______' i � I � j g z_°° �i i� i� i i� i � � , � i ' I ( � � en il �'I' � !. ' r � i v i i i 8 s.00 I � i �� i i ��D I I N I j i /i Nmp �� ss� � 'i � � � � � � �i _ 6.00 �.. � .� li % I ��nin I / I .I F �/ L I I I i�l � E� I � I �F � I I p I � I a 6.II fi '< � �A> _ gs.w. ili 7"0 .� u ��i S�� $_ �i il i/ i �� o.o0 8 � ,, sm Pvc s .� � ,� ih �� i �� I s�e nzs.s II I I ` I � � �' �� I i i �i �� . 1� �6.B] °PN SlR I]i00.00 � ' II 8 6.00 N L . I � \`� � I �� 1 \ �, � � I II � 1� I I � 11 � I I il i .I I I 1 . `\ Ig 6.00 PVl j �'� 1 � I �� 11 \\ \\\� j� i .� 1 � �� 1 \� I \� � 1 I t� �� `\ � I \ � 1 is g 6.03 I 7 � I \1 \ 11 4 I � � I o � I I III I 11 1� � 'I �/ �y � I I � 1 I ].ts � 1' �� I I � I _ � N 6.0 ; N� � I I 1 i I � I I 99 o 6.?b \ vvC 5 A.38rW.00 , � � 11 11 I I I I �� 1 I I V o � I I � 1 �� j I I � I I 1 � 111 1 I � I 1 � 1 I 1.36 ' I 1 � . � p i � � i � 1 � � i �) �>0 8 ati su .00. ti �� i i - i g e. � i � 1� i � r n � I I - �,'� � i � � �i _ i i � �� i � i tl 6]8 � � � I\` 8.00 � � j 1 ; � � 1 , 1 � I � ' � � 1 � \ -- u I \ � \ 1 ��- _ � u fi.25 i pV6� 00 � ' \ g I_16 Pv .?5 j \\� p � \ I ; \ � � � �: � � � i � i i s�.ie r�"' i i / I � _ � /' r, i --J il� � , �i _�—`,' il i i us.�i �au�sraaa.0000 +_----' � i °� a o5.]a N ,�� I � � � I � m�Iv I i � I I � �__—� `` I/ 1 � � � - � i09 _ Ih �� _ -- / I ' D i I �° p� I R ,_ - I/ I � � 8 5 0o SsF g � � I � I � � g s.as rv vs W p li � i � i � $M I �� i , —� i �� , � r i �� .00 �c .»,s000 Q ' i � i i s \V i � i � i � aN� � '� � i :.00 av� v"000.00 n°� `� �� i� i ° � � — � '� i i _ � i •ya S. i�m � � I 8 $ \� f ♦ 05.00 � — _ � / m t I I i � 3.93 0� \ � \ 0o I� 1 1 � I � I I N I I . IM \\1 I � 1 i 8°.ss y 8� � i i �� (� ,� � i i i i li � ��s J � � � � �� / ' ' 'g� � � i � I� / r � / I �i �'S.00 °� / � 1 1 8 3.B} � �� I � I� n I I � I� �N' f � I - �i s9s x�� r � ' i . � � ''� �m� HarveV Point Defense Testin(1 Activit Koni cor��P.a m ��: 7 7 Y 18321 M�iolNen TPke,9We O ��,� kb�. m N� ��p �� Power Line Access Road ��`�� ° = f p ��; �N HerHord, North Carolina Fu 804.3TJ.8980 `-�,�°` m o Em..�.�o�,« �I � 5.00 3.9J � \ I � �� I / seQ � / i �_ 5.00 g }I I � ° / I � I � L I I f/ I � �.W Vy� / � I ' / / I �' /� I S�� 1 E /� �, , � / ,, 500 ,.� - -�: � � 5 95 � �_ I �i I �5.00 _ �� ______ � I 8 5.55 � _ � � _____- _ t� I � �/ II _ \ I z�.o000 °S� ��' / ��y ;s.00 _ / �� _' i o k n� _ �� _ � � �°I I 6 � j _ �___ ., s.00 R "� �� 4 I I � � �'� e5�� a _______' � � � Ir ', � I I I\\ \ I o �� I - I ^r/ � �A i� r i � � � ��`\`� � i 5� j 1� �\ �_' i ' o � �I %� � i � �. `. � � � ` . �� . � � • __ � . i��` '_ Ss.00 i '_'- � �. � � I ° i � � f . i . � i � � � � i o000 � � �\� � 0 5°° o' � -� �`��\ i � P�5 Attt3SOD � �i �i P E Ev.5.00 � �� ., SW _ �W /i � � o ` h s.. oo.00 i j�i�i .f 'i i � � s„ �'' �� P� ..�,�� ---- .� ,. vrs aze �6.6fi � 0639 _-� I o].09 // ' /I/ � 6 56 / I �Pn S� �Ja]S.DO � � � � ' $ah c�c.e.00 � � . o s.a� / �� i � � i � i i i � � i i i � � ' e oo � � -1 cw sa.nm -- 'I `_- vea �.u�s - � ° �� ____' �. / �Si �S�SO.DO ``` ` _- ''' ��1� � � �33 h �� I �5 0 _ ___ I o vt 5 ns6a35.00 �� GVI E V.5.00 . 5.00 I 3.00 ,__ ___ �_______` --�-_ . I o �+ �� J ``_` _ _ _ os� � PKS. .�� #, ��: �`--------�-�i �� w ------------------� - ., �. , -. . �. _ -.. . a.00 e. -_ ---_ ' --- r . , , � ��, ,, """"' " . -„ ,,_ '_' _ ' _'_________ - __' , � ��-,� "'__' �'____'____'_'____ ' ' ' ` _ � �, � __"_____ _'__ ' " '__' _ ___'_' _ __. � � .. ' _'____ __ �5.09 � S Pn ST IB�OO.W � �`. :---�---I..g_�.__'''_ _ _______"__________.___=_____________" i SIW VI L � I �_ ' t71_____->.. � J� '"__- ________ _ ___ " _______ "_ I _ �[` ___- �_'_ "__ �L [ �1 .. S _____________ ='' .' P \i�� / __--- m_ ' S.15 VlSA18�50.00 �� 11N� _` ' �!''_-___`__ ♦_c ml ' � `�` j� .�. -,�� / ��'�:"��'� _,_`__ '�� •,�'� N\ —� . � // . �� . � - ��-6'' 8 � � —_ , P' ,; i �' i �?g ��,g !`�';'�s'. , � � , � . .�,---- �__� _,--�N ' � i �___ -- �� `�:� I o U - - � 0 0 � o � i � -� �i� , I °� N� Harvey Point Defense Testing Activity K,°��,"°�;�,e o� �, m ��^ �, ':�� °� Power Line Access Road �,�,�� ; ��* m N= ��A �° Hertford, North Carolina Fu�+a��+ ��`'° � � A �� C, c-�r.r�apwcaha .:.,�,. g �� ti � � � � � �� :- ti 4 K j � � ��[I `b�� ,� t� � �� R�+�p�� r�� ¢gs��-o ,� ��,, � ��. �{;� �� g�� i� �'�� 4 i� �� m°;�m �� ,.ej � +� �g�# s1g - - g�s°m">o ♦ � �!�# '��4 �� #d � �� "Yom;°o ; �� 4 A .� s Y I �� y�a.�� . �� ' �� r� �� g�=��¢9 - �� ;�� Ry�� 1� IC�� = a� F -: � � • g ;.es� yao� � �s� �l� �f6 4r �s� I � Aa� $� h--+( �' * 'xtfr �� i� �R �s � a p �z ' ,`� `'�� ; t!� � + �!' ` � I , ��p �� .�;'. � `n O 4� � �'.b 'S, t � ! � , D #� ...__... —�_ �S •�``�� t, t� g �� I � A � � �� I ' ---.,: ._._., - « ' ♦ � � +� w--Y� � � �� .. � � �a � �� , IZ � a � � i `� \� i, , N �� 3 �� , ��P � � �.. � ��\\\ ��•a��\ /1, .{ ��_i•�1� i 1 �` 1'._'�".—,{ a #�' � � - ' �� ,�–– ~ �� d� � j �' �+ � , , 0=�9� _ � I� ��_� '� �_ , ___ �--- I_-�_--__�— _-_ _____ --- `�� '� ;m �� '�, --- �� . _ - � , ---_ �----------- --� __--- ----- �� --- . , _ � ---- ,,.- -----------� i� ,� o ,m - --- ---= � � -- , r , ��...�.. ----- , ----_r- - - - - __t.=�_� _ ��_ , ,,, _ ,---------__- _ _ - �_� ---- --- ---- � � " - �, _ _ ,, -----� -� ;� � m= a -'_ ,;� t1,� ; - __�-- '"� .�!`-'=�_-"_--- p6� \`, --' �_ �•� �� '``.�='�,-;,,-� O �"F I � i � .��%' .-' >s i �� ,�'� -'� I � °� �� , .' � .00 i � .,py� �� i . . � _ - ? y _ , .O , � � z . -P , . � a .�P' _ �� . . •�� • ; mg � k� � 8 � `.9� ��'�n2� \\ _ �� i/ d:`` o� � 8 _ -� '-- °�;�' �� o * �� i � . " _- __-- �" 8 i b , � I � , , ,. � � � i �. >$I �' � '=' � � i , i i ❑ - ---- �\ � �� i �` '�� i � I i r i� �� i � i q r� , i � d�. i s� i y i � � � i �'S i g i � '� i i ° _ � i �. x � � \ 1 p I I � � � / 1� .�',, � B� ¢1 ~ � I/ I ' ; ' O II I ° �' �o. J i Z i � ��' i � 0 �i i � i i i� ii � i ii i i � � �u I ' ' ' i � � � � , � m� � , � , � � , ;� � ' ' � ' ' � � � i , , , � � i i , N �� ^� Harve Point Defense Testin Activit KorH cor��P.c. � � ., I �m �� N Y 9 Y 1:q2f 1AdoW�n Td�e,SuXe O �. � � �� Power Line Access Road "A1°°'"�^"^�"��' �� ,�p� � �p �o �nm�eoor.f�.ona ,�� = D Heriford, North Carolina F�� m � p i �N Emst Pnc�IpWKOthx � ' g ms.m-�dtd..n nwi.si �o��'w�3m �a�r'�en�n •l�Yi�IMJ i�I�il�IW7 YMV uwecx s womnta .� LII��W]l�%3l!YO OIOIY xiu�n yoe uwoxH�o�o[c��w tlI1YlY0AlIW1 i0'1�30�, NDII�WDOlWI f0'1130 � 77Mxt YOJ 11Y110Mi iliY0M00 nrtiqrn x�a o MIII�nNLN110�71iY7NWJ tipm�wm ', �^ YW 9MfIMYO OY�VNIS XSil79 f0 31Y1B 'q YOd'JN:RItlO MYOMIIS MBITJN3 l0]1�18 � �'- � i7 s �� fld i� �"� �'� i m � � B� __- '� °, I � �� 8 � �� F � I' �` ;�, � � "� a�:�z� � �W .� a� � '�� , _= i � a �' ° i a � ! - ;�� n m' � •�� ,�� - Q m �.�I I �� ;5 � I r°s � ap ^ � �� ?�� a �#"j � € >f� �;� �I �� u �, `, �� - �' `, � �� e_� a =' � `�I � �,�i �� =a� , � �o "�� 9g � y� �6�. �'� �� O 'i � i `� �� . 9 � � - {}� � �o i � �: E' �F � _ . 3 � '� � � i� .� e�� E �r E � � '�qp1 ' � "� i � O I� �� u�� '� � ( .J '�� Ip �...R __�� $~ I � i 4 y oL g � � � Y'r 1'IIL �F " �Y � �- `3� S �' "e � �b ��b� S. � �' � s; ��? � � - �i �� '^, � �o>s� P� � �' � I � �� i � s �� g� � - - — 'R�� y � ' N ' � 6 � � o � �' e � 3� _ �� I "� � _ x ... ` ➢�:�as m=r , , m Q � �� J � z ; °�,�; ;3Q='F� �� I ; F � ah�# p a o "'A i i $ S > ,�_,� �?"o�k n6N � I � fs� � � '_-.� �yc�� ^� _ � � _ §i� �� b�^, i i - - es � y� - �� i i� _ i EIGLIlN BTIM0.Vi0 q1111NG� ' $T�l(pi CYi1lX BTIlGMO pINIMB fOR ' 6T�TF OG g wMarcrE oiow��roe esx� o-■a.o�n� � arainE wurtu�ioxu� �*M w�o�:w � � � � evt.ar nuurai��na�. xrt.as nv�wauna ± AND DW�I��I�CUL11�T{ OMf[OI M NIGMn �UiE/ITN RIO[0 M fLE%IYF MVpENT WVI{[pl OI NiWMYb I I / �6"Tlpll�!"PIPE.p•BKEM �MFIM.M.C. MKEIBI.N.C. � I/ Ya18.0!'LId,.M llWl..91 I/ � � '�'N'IBI3TIY �19.0!'1d2i.��flWl.94 '�'V'WI]T/tl � tiya�in�aala atrwa axv u..�aM s womuo ti�tm 7�i�ai�noo am awot��o.ocunia i �OIIVIYG6MALL i0'IflO, N021YlY0dBNYYI i0'1a30 � g. ilMIf YO!11YIWM3 313YONW v�ndn�uwi ilMIt Y0�1111q0 il7Y9M0� wrvxv��uxox IpI'JMGWYO OtlYO�Y15 N6f19N3 ��v� ipl BM:�M110 OIf�01/I18 NB[lON3 l0 3tv1B � � I I � I -- 1 -- � G � � � I' I �'. � � 9 � _ - — 9 � - • j g p � y i , r � �� -- ; � , �1 —F , � e i � i � i � � '� ;� . � , '� � I �. j �j � i ,;,, 1 i , ��_-=�' = - � +— ;=�� • � __ L T 1 - _'..'-^ '.i �1 7� - ��e.�..r• �... ( . . ,';R.=. '... � . , z�; p9a9i$i � �-ry� � ._ ,: F��EO� �" , 1. 4 5�M1 � .S � �� I � I� ;t• {R�'1,� I •'I{ �� `I�� II�!i ,I� ^ .. r"•3}• yt : :s ! ��_�� -'az:� °1 ' •ii. P y -_1 � � �� il �i >S '� � 5� 1},i�� : �S�o � �Li"� �. i !�� .{�� 7p � �� ..�. DQ � �� i I �, 86 Y FS� i. :4�� "�� t ii. •'�� •� ��9;� Y N � �fi � � �� G �. i � �J LL,� ' -_a; � e.• 'q� ' �F :i.°.. .} ,I'.•I"r i e ' � e � - ' 4 � 1 R4!!! 1 - � i 1 qe ' � 414°�'• •• •' S C _.1L • f [ � 1 a _ Yf � � � C._ :S � i 2 � � � � �I°I.: � I � j I � r :: °i;�� g� �r,,, � e_ '';� �� r%� � � �� $ � . '°A ' ,-_.jf al � t° ` +'�F=� _ �i . . � Sj, �r �' •: s' 'e y � _�r. � ��. o } EN0LIm1 liIMOMD OMIIIIN f011 SiAlf 6 FIYS3M�TNG�MD dlNllq ipl 6TATF Ot � ' �Ili M i. CONCII[TE DIOMLL f011 tIMYE �a�x c�q�xr� g CONC�[T[pIOMLL F011{IIML[ xa*M uiauw i $ xn.ar twwra�r�na uv*.a mwsa�r�nw j IIMD DOINIE PIPE WLVEIIT{ otrxua as x�wwxs NO OOINIL�IrE WLVBIT6 oirie[a or ncaaws \\//�/ � i �6"TMU N"cIPE-YU'BkEV ��w.�.c. ,c^rxnu�e^rtvf.ao.s�, w��w.n.c. �\��Q\� . �I � ��RL/ I I /��nJ� � i S ��\ � '� II =��n I \��\/ � I'�'yg I f 1 $n / � s �I ��\��y/ . 3 � �� N /�\/�/ I 4 T��/ 1I� I $ l�lL2l/ I� $ (\ �� 11\11 b � m � � "m � �^� Harve Point Defense Testi Activit Kon-i cor��r.c. � A m � ; <„ Y �9 Y ,�,�.�,T�e.�e o r �, �. � � � �°� Power Line Access Road �� _ '' w°9 � a �> Hertford, North Carolina E�� "ti:�; s = �, \\ `--_"_, � � `f4a p^I-- �� _ g 1� ,�� _, ". I � � I%_.-� `��II�\ ` `�//i i ��JI �� - �\ // .j�� 'jp fi'4� .. \II\ \ � I/-'- \ `� /� �N�� V� �� 4��I i� - �'� '�N \1 �\ `I, _ la � q i�� '__ �� _ /l , ;�� '� _ - - , �� i' �� , _ , -- �, , ,. ,, \� ',''i �� i �'', � - ---- � ., � , , , , � r � � ;,� ��,� , � ,,� , ''; ;' � IIII, ° � ��` I / ' _` � �'°��; - �, � , ' �� `� � I � _______- � ��I� �I I S/ �� a�� I \ �� 1 � �i 1 � l, \ . � ��. � �I �� \�I I �/ /.c\\\ .% I� 'P�� °v� I __� \ �� \1 % �i �'y -__ °I i i� � ( � Zi. i4 -_ I � ��'' � �t- . i Iu� + nIq i � �1 , I�i�l � �I�I\� I I^� %'i f'�p f t__ t �� / i } �' %'/ , i fl'I� 6 I ' �\� ' 1 ;````f\`\ �- �'_ -___ ��=--__---__ i�; . �L___ + � l �i \�r� <�` r� �.,\ hC-- — ' �--_ _ ''� �� , ��1. ,_; _ `\ _��/ 1.J%�_ i� �� 1 ��i N// `/l \\\� � � � 1 �� y�I '� II I I .i \ \� � \� 1 . �1 1 1 1 �U _\\� � \\ ��+8 �� 1 �� \ I� ''\ � \ � ��I P4 �/� %� I ' I I I � �I I \I \ � I\ �I � �\� ��I �`�n� � i/ � 1 � � li � � �l '' /\ \\\ i � � �� v P, � � � i �f � ' _ �` ' _ • _-- �� r� � � �� ' ' � � ,.- - - , . ��,�,.,;�;�;�� ; ��- \ �1� � I I �`�' � =J�.1=�i' �� i/ \ \ ��1 � 11 � � / \\� . 1 f Ill ll�' �O � �� _-� �%%�//i// �� \\ i + . i ��ili� q�M w � _ t �!iv �.i � � � � —�i --- � i ql�� ;. ��, i '� � � I ``, \ / i qiu a `�i ` % / (i�\\ \ i � i x;n • b � .. � � � �J� /�\ 1 I 1 Ilil\�_- I p ``------�� \�il // � � \ I � � I 1 1 � 1 I t /i�i°.� �i i uir � �� i , � � i �I�i � � ��i `a � �i- . .. i ^\\ ` _- ',i' 'Q� � � � l� �`� � i�� i ili �,�e� , �;I 3in"• � i� i � � ,::"; 4 �� }i `.: /i��iii'ii � �� a � ��`�� %s�� -' /•� •' � �I i� �'�P � \ �,'�� , _ _- -_� � i - (?u r- �-�� .:'�� '' ",�� w� " �r:..' _--�; � + ;%'�� ` ` ':sc '� e � "( �,-i - .�'i __ i . � � 41� � � �J T� ��i � n,,,,_ �� q �. �'y y ,% i �� ii � � rr ii- ,�',� � ��F�,�r � ��: �� E _•�� . (�� i�� '_ "' ` -''`i � � ' - . � �� , � i� � _ l� �� L" � �� • � � - � � � � � � � •�� ,> m i �`� �-'` ` �s'i �� ,.�� ` �� ; i.�.�i , ��`. i� � � � � � � %,as:��:' li � �� ' : �� i �i '� i i , , � , , , : r r j; , , ___ . „� I � � \ � / j/ � 1 �.,i, � _ _ '- - "'='__i_� ____'___ � \�1 y \ \I i1`I / /� I I ,_,- y_° � �- __",� 1 - - � � ` i�� \I t , � ,f��i�� (\.� 'N \ I � � /�II 1 ��/`\ \� ,� j' � QiA�l '��t/` Qr I� _ \\I �-�" \\�� \ ;� I I � ii in li., _4i� '__��tp `___', I �, ��'4 1 `_ � ' /J'� � �� 1 I' IIIII f ��1 '\\ II II1r � �� / �- f �� -I ry��,'\\ - �� - ♦ tl IIII � � i I �/' i \_ Cy� �/-�__11 I� � '�II _ I i� _�_-� a p� _ ` [ � �� -_-�._J, II 'll Cf.�-1�\��__ t� I / II �� ` °m�� _ �� v\�_—_ �Ill ��I _lG` � 1 _ _ .i /' ��``I ^�� __ " " _ _ �__ �i__ ___�-__-___-__-_�.--�=�=-_s"""'= - � \ s� i `� .,� ..� ___ ' , - J`�{ii �,�� , ii " $� �� e � 'S� r ' `ii li ��j�-_�� i I� -- - �i ��i� ��i �( ..r, p �- � �. ' ` `�� a i � �' _ � � ' �.'� ,��' ,� � �i � �. , ' „ ;i i ' � ' i'� , ,i � i� � � i � i (�� I4� �� ' � � �II `-J ``� � / / I I�� \ I �I�\ \\ _ 1��\ 1/ I � �I .�-` � �I I � ill �1 1� 1� 1� � 1 II +�� %��i �'I� � �1 _, I \` %� 1 �� / �Ill t I ' ,�1 �� `\ 1� � � � � II % �I \ \` � �`\�_i.�i� �I i . ; __� \ I/ � � I .I"_� II� �� i��j \\ ; I % i /I ' / i�J11 ,�%6_�_rl� I _.= �� _/ � / � ' \ I� i 11� I / � � / \\\ \•\i � \� i�i� � �Xij I `��--�iY � � `:/%� I�i _• �_ ', tl � � � -�-� �li� . I��` 1 ��i � r � ii i 14 oi�- i i ` i � � ' 1 �� i� \ �r � I�, �I I � , � � � , 7 �i� � ��I _ � � s -- — — — I l°-�cFa'.e-c � 1i�� ` rvl __`_� ` � � � '-_'_"_, _ .,_=r'_ �\ � i I\ i � '`'s-�_� '��M�_ �_-� -`� I \` �'_"' .� � �_ s ° i 'i I. �""' � ---" �f' ' 0 ri_�, � i --s�-: v��n � �"�•-'-:4 __ � ��_� � i +� M "�__'" 8 e��pir \ i I.' � i) c��i __ } i I i i I , fn��. � i � \ i i ii - � A �� i ii� ��.i i I � � n �� I n � � , _ i i �� ----, �� i �� ; ui i i '� i , �i - � `�� ' '� � 'i � �II', �._- ,�, --� ��;�, ``i ' 6 `� / 'el ��i��Px�-�"'__`"�„'_ � �\��I �\. ,i� � __' ,,,,�I..i � .y,� -'cv__"ttz^`�.-�_�_"___� �� i � `---- 'ii`�i �i I� - ---- --- -- _ � ��i� �� i��-_� �i � ", '` -�� uii l��i� � _�i � .. i ri �n _ '-- �I--"r,;.' uii , i�ii - �-' i � ,','r' - i i � i , �ii _ � .j' ;i2=/_�9\ t � _ - i:/ -- nu-= -_) -'- . � - ° �— m � \ �<�( Harve Point Defense Testi�1�7 Activit Kon-i cor��r�P.c. N Y '':J Y 13321 MldoWen Tpka.SMe O '.. fi �? �.��,� � „ �°� Power Line Access Road "'b°'"�'��' � � : Phonw 80M11J9.OBW ' m°m � �> Hertford, North Carolina Fu:�a�.� ` o m Em�k PrhdPWKotha . '`"��.s�� m k z z u, � s a a � J� I I 3 l i .i � a;■ ` . . L s a s � J ;9 , �: e x i r . .,.I:.. ...... C � � �.�9• S V i� Ca : 0 a � ��'1' : R'C �� ti �s 8 6 � ��' � �� a R'9 � �- �t `s 6 8 � I� ' t �i � c�c � �: t �� '� '� 9�559 �y� �� 9lf99 �� !f _ r 9999 �ii �� acgga � �i� �� - - - Y � � i� o �i j � i' �� r y ; � �� iI � e t � f - - � � I t:� I f� i ii i — � t F - - i - ��, - t / - I - i e I � _ e 1 - - li jt, i 4 T¢� � E�' � � � t. 7 r - r � - a -� I' � '� c�_ ,� _ _ f' j _ a F .� jj;_ �� :i. � vT y.= _ � • �1 .a � ' i i i a 1 � p €� a r';i 1 p� � �Z 's : :� I p !� �� _ � Z �� . � {� : � i� � �� : i `� � ,. �I;I� �� t � � i �� r � � ' f t � i i �� '� � r I ( � �t '. !ti � i � ,�f � {III � i �1' til � i a �t � iii yI'� � i �l i � �I � �� I� � �II f� 1 i � Q j I � 1 i '� 'I� � �I� � � , � ; � � � � , � 1� �` � � _ : � � � i ( � j a� .B�a (i � � E i°�j� '�s { j{ f ; r� I�° { �� t e��• �j F I � � i �P' � .� t1 � � ��y E _��`� t � 6'' Q i�.�t� ( � f' e � 1� ,. .. a ♦ ' - -j�I r—�- s a s » t I I 1 ! : r i ( f ! I i!��; c a.w � ��f� t � � � !�°F' ,_ � � � j� e B a � 9�� Y _ �� = a o � ��=� '�t �� : ; ; i �� i- ' 9 ��€ F�� : - � 99999 sK?� �� - � � 9:399 ��f';- s r �� r �r . � e t rt a i t � - - - - - - - _ - - - - = � �� - - ; �� _ti = - - � �� #r . _ _ . . . �� : `s j� . . . _ r `� � ' �xy � � _ ; ,� - , �; , _ _ r .i _ , t ; :� �� ,� - _ _ ..F. ,� : ��.� �i � _ - T E� : N� t - ` � Il � • ` � - ' '' � � � _ - ' '' : : - ? _ . : -� �`j. - : i y; (� ;�e ' - F �w •� '. � � : : : c � ; L�f�: : : i � �_' � ii� � t . . �� 1� t {i Si � i � � � � � � � I � �� i�� 4 ��j � � � ; ,I � � � •r � �t�� j � tr �' i►� � : r� :z �' ift f 1 -i i � �,+ I�,;( �-- !� � ��i � ��i '� � i' � Y� � �� I � � �h � � 1 � t �. r I i � •• �: � � � ; �v� j � �� :- i � � 5 _� ��' � �� F i_��F�� : � �( ��' !� P f I , � �m� Harve Point Defenae Tesf Activit Kon-i cor�n��P.c. Y �9 Y ,��,�T�e.�e o : �, �3_ m N� ��° �°� Power Line Access Road ""��"� ;�� _ J m _ > Hertford, North Carolina E�:°��!« ; `��`\ �� C � -� C)� (n � (/� I \/ � �� I O � � � o I � Q � � � D � �-0 ,� I S�. m � C� o �I cn � � C C) — A/ � O O I � �� o � � � CD NAD83 / D o `� Q � � m � � ' n4 � QQ � �• � � < 1 / D � � � � � � �� < �- � � c� � 0 m `° `� � � � NO � � a O Q � � O � � � � l — � � O� � � � � � � Q � � fi I \ O � � Q � '—� 6 Q (D � O _ I Z ° � `` Q � � �' � � X. � a � � � 3 � r � aQ � a � �D � C� � \ cD p �I �' � � �' � � � '� � o �D m o � � � ,--r a � � � � �. C�D D � cp �' � � � � � < ^ � / /� ' rt ^ O � � '� � � (� � Q / ,J . ~ \ Z � � < � � (�.� D rt � O � � C Q � � � � � � ' � o Q � Q � o O � � / � ,-•- r` �, � p � �' � / � ' / '/�► Q a � Q Q � o � � � /� �� v � o � � / — / � � � � �� i m � � � Q � � � � � � � � Z � � � � � cD � Q � � o- � °- � � �� \ � , , -� � � � � � � � 7� DO �--� � � � p � o � � � � , V � � � � � � � � \ � Z CD — ,--� �o o � to � � � � � _o �' a � rt ,--� o � � �� I � r � � � � � � � Q � � � � � � x � o � � o � ,rn O D � � `�° ° � \ � � � � _ � . � � o rn � � _ -� i i � D , - - � o � i i � v � �� _ — — �� i � �O D - - -� ' — - � � � � O ` / ! _ — '/ / � \\ �// // � � � � � � �/ � � // � � ' „ � � � � � _._. � � \ � :�, _ � o � � � � \ _� , ' — o � � ,/ m � � � � �� i p \� � , \4 ' ' � . ° D �� `I \ � � � 2 .��. � � I � �� i o n. � � � �� I � `j . I ° D. � � � � � . �„ o . . �� I �� / � � , Rrl� �� ` �� , � � � � �� , . i� �� . . � o , r n � � � � i�/ �� n � �� `�;' � ITI � �� i i; �;!��z � � A/ � � D NAD83 �� " n - ' � � � �� J �� v v \ \� �� / / j�/ � � \ / , / / /� � // // ,/�� 7'� � �� / �� / .�� "� �� '?� � � � : � �� i I '�. � � � (� �� _ � � i� �� i �r��= i i 0 \ � � � �� l Z L � i i � � C \� ��/ � � � � � � � \ � _ _ i i �� - _ _ � � � \ � > � � m 0 - - - - ° � � '�:� � � � x � /� � z n �'' � � � � A _�� '� � 0 Z D Z �/ , , ' � rn O � D � � D � � � � � � r � �� ♦ o — IV � D � D � b ��'� ^�' i' � � � � 2 � � � �; � � /� � � � � (� � � �+ � � N D � o � / � / / Z � � '� ' �� // /l _ n � D � � .-� A r � �� / / � D �. � m � � # �� / + (� � � � �� g � � - - , (� p ` / p i � o � �— � � i� ;�/ � I \ � / �/ � ,� i�I Zb I �/ � �� , _ _ _ _ � � � �� i � � I � _ - - �� I � � �i � � _ , � / � � � /�/ �� .. � � % �� I � �� c � � � I � � I �� ,�o � �� l I �� I �� 9 a n � � I � / � C) m � � \� � � � �� rn i � � � i �' � � � � � D � NA 3 � ' � ' n Q �� F � � � � �� I � I � �1 � � - - - 1 I \ - - - - - - - _ � I � 1 � O \ �� ► � \\ I/ � � � �� / � � � � � n � � � ` I � � � � � � _ � � Z � L ii o � � � � , � � � � � , � \ - - � � � � - - - A D � � � �' _ _ - v � o rn i , , _ _ _ C) ♦ z � ; � � � , ' , I �b � � �D Z o . , � � � - _ _ , . , , � � � �� N � D � �µ � . � � ` � � � rn `� � � . � n D - - � � � � - � � � - ,- - �� _ � - - - � ; v � �l � � / � � � m / \ � � + D � � � � r� - �� $ � � � � � � �� , \ � �� , � r � � � , � � �� \��,, � � , � ♦ '� � - - - � , , � � � �,, � � ! � u� . � '� ,� � �� I \ \ 'I i 4 � � �- J �� -_---�� \ \\'�' � `�� \\'�� `' I� ,' �� ' W ��, �� , � � �,, ��, ��l�� \ � � � � \ � \'�',`\ A� ° � \ �� ) Ul , �� , � � �� o � � � `, � I n n � � � � � '�� , A �, �1 � �„� � � � �� i � � n m � n �j D � �� On � � � � � � @ � v � n � � Z � � � _ � �- � a C c° � a n � � � _ _ o Z � � -�i. n C �o� � n. � ��Q z � rn p� a �Q�, � � o �.�� a � n = � �' � � � � � o Z O p D ;� � �-� � r � � �� N p D ` �� rn �°�� v � � � D � �� _ � `� - n � � � � o � � + rn � � \ rn m �- $� � � �� , . 3f � � � � N "'� m �� m � N .• •.... � � � w .��:� �� ° � � � •:;,�. ' �� i � � � I '� o`.' � z � � � � 3 � @ �v`� � � � .:�y � � � � C 5.s� � � n e� �� O ��m� ?3�. j �� c, Z -�� Ill 'n cn A�� 3,,a_ °' � {� D n � � D �� / � m a�