20040838 Ver 6_401 Application_20111128

www t w r! g m
S o � - o83g v �
STEWART
November 23 2011
Mr ]amie Shern
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive Suite 105
Wake Forest North Carolina 27587 � ���an/12
v � p
Division of Water Quality (2 Copies & PD
4oi/Wetlands unit �G� � S 2011
1650 Mail Service Center DENR WATERqUALITY
Raleigh NC 27699 1650 �1ANOSANDSTORMWATERBRANCH
Sub�ect Walnut Creek Greenway
Dear Sirs
The City of Raleigh is submitting a PCN for this pro�ect which includes the Walnut
Creek Trail from to the Worthdale Park to the Neuse Rrver more than 4 miles of
trail in total
This trail was designed in the same manner as the Neuse River Trail that was
previously submitted and approved this year
The attached PCN details the significant avoidance and minimization efForts taken
during design to reduce impacts The City proposes compensatory mitigation in the
form of preservation
Please contact me (bcrawford@stewart eng com or 919 866 4735) or Vic Lebsock
919 996 4786 if you have any questions or require further detail
Sincerely
STEWART ENGINEERING, INC
�
Ben�amin R Crawford PE
Senior Roadway Engineer
Cc Vic Lebsock City of Raleigh
ENGINEERING INNOVATION SOLUTIONS T" 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET RALEIGH NC T 919 380 8750
SUITE 400 27601 F 919 380 8752

Pre-Construction Notification
For the proposed
Walnut Creek Greenway Trail
Worthdale Park to
The Neuse River
Ruleigh, Nortti Carolina
Prepared for
City of Raleigti, NC
Prepared By
S � ,
STEWART
November 23 2011

o�,��WATE`�pG Office Use Only:
i � � � Corps action ID no.
i �i, i a -� DWQ project no. 10-0525
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
'Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: 23 or General Permit(GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑Yes � No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular � Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation �Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑Yes � No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Walnut Creek Greenway
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Multiple, Please see attached
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Multiple, Please see attached
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if Vic Lebsock, City of Raleigh
applicable):
3d. Street address: 222 Hargett Street, Suite 601
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
3f. Telephone no.: 919-996-4786
3g. Fax no.: 919-996-7663
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: �Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Victor Lebsock
4c. Business name City of Raleigh, Parks and Recreation Department
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 222 Hargett Street, Suite 601
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
4f. Telephone no.: 919-996-4786
4g. Fax no.: 919-996-7663
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: lona Thomas,AICP
5b. Business name Stewart Engineering, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 421 Fayetteville, Ste. 400
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
5e. Telephone no.: 919-866-4762
5f. Fax no.: 919-380-8752
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Multiple, see attached
1b. Site coordinates(in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude: -
35.7470347 -78.562546
1 c. Property size: Multiple Parcels= 664.5 AC
2. SurFace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water(stream, river, etc.)to Walnut Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site conditions are currently floodplain with forest and some utility easements for power and sewer lines. In the vicinity
of the project land use is predominantly residential. The City of Raleigh has acquired land and easements the length of
the corridor.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
37.23 AC(multiple parcels)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
6,748 LF of Perennial Streams, 269 LF of Intermittent Streams (multiple parcels)
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Raleigh's Walnut Creek Greenway Trail is the major east west element in the Capital Area Greenway System. It currently
follows Walnut Creek from Lake Wheeler Road to Worthdale Park,with major greenway connections to the Rocky Branch
Trail and the Little Rock Trail. The Walnut Creek Greenway extension will begin at Worthdale Park and follow Walnut Creek
to the Neuse River Trail (under construction). In addition to acting as a link to the Mountains-to-Sea Trail, locally the trail will
connect recreational, residential, and commercial nodes providing an alternative mode of transportation and increasing
recreational opportunities. This project will connect Downtown Raleigh, NC State University and Umstead Park to the Neuse
River Trail. The project is also part of the City of Raleigh's efforts to protect water quality and increase riparian buffer areas
in the Neuse corridor. The project includes property and easement acquisition that places 4,201 acres into greenway
conservation or park land. The project increases the Neuse River Buffers from 50 feet up 75 feet on both sides of the creek.
In some areas the entire floodplain has been permanently conserved. The City of Raleigh conservation effort is important to
the health of the Neuse River Basin given the heavy residential development within the Basin.
The length of the project is approximately 3.8 miles.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves existing natural surface utility access roads and construction of new 10'wide asphalt paved trail. The
existing access roads are typically 10-feet wide and account for approximately 3+ miles, mostly between I-440 and New Hope
Road. Boardwalk is used to prevent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and avoid jurisdictional stream impacts. There is one
bridge that crosses Walnut Creek.
The City of Raleigh is administering the project and will oversee the construction.
The contractor selected for the project will determine the equipment used on the project. However,trail contractors generally
use small paving machines and earth moving equipment which have lower impacts to the project area than traditional
highway construction equipment. Multiple construction entrances have been identified to minimize trip distances of equipment.
Nationwide Permit 23 General Conditions will be included in construction documents to direct contractor operations in and
around wetlands. Boardwalk has been designed and will be constructed top down. This construction method reduces both
permanent and temporary impacts to wetlands.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases) in the past? �Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final
Agency/Consultant Company:
4c. If yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Environmental Services Inc.
Name (if known): Gail Tyner 524 S. New Hope Road Raleigh, NC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps reviewed a Jurisdictional Packet February 2009 and declined a field review. DWQ reviewed the Neuse River
Buffer Applicability March 24, 2009
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for �Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project(including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file"instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? �Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Yes, Phase 1 is from the Worthdale Park to New Hope Road. Phase 2 is from New Hope Road to the Neuse River Trail.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. 2. 3. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
�Wetlands � Streams-tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. 5. 6. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Permanent Temporary
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Impacts
number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps-404, 10 (acres)
Permanent(P)or (if known) DWQ—non-404,other)
Tem ora T
W1 � P ❑ T Fill �Yes � Corps <0.01
❑ No ❑ DWQ
� � P � T Hand Clearing, �Yes � Corps 0.03
Temporary fill ❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 � P ❑ T Fill �Yes � Corps 0.02
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P � T Hand Clearing, �Yes � Corps 0.07
Temporary Fill ❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P � T Hand Clearing, �Yes � Corps 0.01
Temporary Fill ❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g.Total wetland impacts 0.03 0.11
2h. Comments: Boardwalk is not considered an impact—only fill.
7. 8. 9. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,then
complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 39�
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial or Type of Average Permanent Temporary
number-Permanent intermittent? jurisdiction stream Impact length ImpactLength
(P)or Temporary width
(T)
� P � T Temporary Fill, RS1 � PER ❑ Corps 3' 30'
temporary pipe ❑ INT � DWQ
� P � T Temporary Fill, SF9 � PER ❑ Corps 4' 30'
temporary pipe ❑ INT � DWQ
� P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ I NT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 60'
3i. Comments:
Temporary stream impacts associated with temporary access issues include installation of temporary pipe for
construction equipment crossing. The contractor will be instructed to follow NW14 procedures for temporary
structures:
"This NWP also authorizes temporary structures,fills, and work necessary to construct the
linear transportation project. Appropriate measures must be taken to maintain nonnal
downstream flows and minimize flooding to the ma�imum extent practicable, when temporary
structures, work, and discharges, including cofferdams, are necessary for construction
activities, access fzlls, or dewatering of construction sites. Temporary fzlls must consist of
materials, and be placed in a manner, that will not be eroded by expected high flows.
Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre-
construction elevations. The areas affected by temporary fzlls must be revegetated, as
appropriate. "
LISACE Corps representatives have also directed the City that a woven separator fabric be
used beneath any and all temporary fzll. The purpose being to aid in the removal of
temporary fzll and ensure the area is returned to pre-construction elevations and conditions.
Winnin bidders is to coordinate all tem ora structures with the owner/construction
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

administrator prior to construction.
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

10. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries,tributaries, sounds,the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S.then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)
or Temporary(T)
01 ❑ P ❑ T
02 ❑ P ❑ T
03 ❑ P ❑ T
04 ❑ P ❑ T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: There are no Open Water impacts
11. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed,then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments: There are no Pond or Lake impacts.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑Yes � No Ifyes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,then complete the chart below. If yes,then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation,then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent(P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary(T) impact required?
B1 � P ❑ T Cut/Fill Walnut Creek �Nos 1,182 952
B2 � P ❑ T Cut/Fill Tributary of Walnut Creek �Nos 4,487 1,304
B3 � P ❑ T Cut/Fill Tributary of Walnut Creek �Nos 1,956 1,315
B4 ❑ P � T Clearing Walnut Creek �Nos 576 1,444
B4 � P ❑ T Cut/Fill Walnut Creek �Nos 12,056 7,290
B5 � P ❑ T Cut/Fill Walnut Creek �Nos 6 2,999
6h. Total buffer impacts 19,687 13,860
6i. Comments:
While Greenway Trails are an allowable use within buffer zones, every effort has been made to reduce the
encroachment into buffer zones. Per a meeting on December 8, 2010 with Annette Lucas of DWQ; the trail and
culverts are designed to only allow flow for which is naturally conveyed through existing draws in the land. Also, all
concentrated flows created by the trail are diffused with a level spreader prior to entering the Neuse River Riparian
Buffer.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Corridor Realignment- The horizontal alignment has been adjusted to avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands, streams
and buffers as much as possible. Where these resources can be avoided they have been.
Stream Crossing Location —At each stream crossing a detail analysis was performed to identify the best crossing
spot. This includes crossing at the most narrow point, crossing perpendicular to the stream and crossing away from
parallel streams.
Boardwalk over Wetlands—The City of Raleigh has a policy of using boardwalk to cross all jurisdictional wetlands
throughout their greenway network. While this is a costly policy from both a construction and maintenance perspective
the City is committed to preserving wetland function.
Minimizing Grading -The trail itself matches existing grade to minimize the amount of fill and reducing the overall
footprint of the project and thus the impacts to jurisdictional waters.
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

Buried Dissipater Pads— NCDOT requires dissipater pads at the outfall of all pipes to dissipate velocity. All dissipater
pads on this project will be buried to the existing stream bed elevation to allow for aquatic life passage.
Reduced Typical Section—The City of Raleigh originally desired 3' shoulders throughout the project. These wider
shoulders would aid in maintenance and reduce problems associated with root incursion damage to pavement.
Shoulders were reduced to 2', the AASHTO minimum standard, to reduce the overall footprint of the project and
impacts.
Minimize Clearing—A large percentage of the trail will be located within a cleared sewer easement. The location of the
trail within this cleared and maintained easement reduces the need for additional clearing in sensitive riparian areas.
Culvert Inverts -All designed culverts are increased in size to allow proper burial of the inverts of the pipe to ensure
passage of aquatic life. Depending on the size of the pipe it is buried 6" or 20% of the pipe diameter.
Stormwater Treatment -All ditches along the trail outlet into wetlands. The wetlands function as a natural treatment
device.
Erosion Control -Silt Fence has been applied along fill slopes and upstream of all wetlands and streams.
Combination Tree-Protection and Silt Fence is utilized to demarcate all Buffer Zones to maximize protection and
environmental awareness of the contractor during construction.
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The contractor shall be responsible for minimizing the impacts through construction techniques. However, the bid
specification will call for hand clearing where possible, use of construction mats in sensitive areas, small paving
machines and generally low impact machines to be used on the project in sensitive areas. Multiple construction
entrances have been provided to minimize trip distances of heavy equipment. Nationwide 23 General Conditions will
be included in construction specifications.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑Yes ❑ No City unsure of mitigation requirement.
2b. If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes,which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Stream Quantity: TBD
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes,then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified �Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes,then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The runoff directed into the Riparian Buffers occur at culverts that �Yes � No
flow under the proposed greenway trail. All outlets of these culverts have been
provided with NCDOT standard sized rip rap velocity dissipater pads. All other
runoff shall sheet flow across the trail and be of an adequately diffuse flow.
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0.693%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan,then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Govemment Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? City of Raleigh
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply(check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? �Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the �Yes ❑ No
use of public(federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State �Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑Yes � No
Comments: Programmatic Categorical Exclusion approved by NCDOT-FHWA.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes � No
additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,"provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or �Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act �Yes ❑ No
impacts?
� Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ESI, Inc. reviewed the NHP database and conducted habitat evaluations. See attached USFW letter.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCDOT Website—Index By County of Water Bodies
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation �Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
ESI, Inc. coordinated with SHPO and the site was approved.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? �Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: For trails no fill will be placed within the floodway or floodplain. The
project has been coordinated with the Local Floodplain Administrators and NC Floodplain Mapping. For bridges that cross
Walnut Creek and its tributaries within detailed study areas CLOMRs or No-Rise Certifications have been submitted,
reviewed, comments incorporated and approval is expected soon.
8c.What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodmaps
Benjamin Crawford, PE Oct. 25 2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ApplicanUAgent's Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
WORTHDALE PARKTO NEW HOPE ROAD
Parcel No. Owner Name Plansheet No. DB&PG PIN Easement Pro ert acres
200 CITY OF RALEIGH 4 DB 1550, PG 0346 1723320892 N/A 32.253
201 CITY OF RALEIGH 4 1723114635 N/A 28.411
202 CITY OF RALEIGH 4,5 DB 3515, PG 709 1723414973 N/A 80.139
203 WILSON,ANNIE 6 DB 931, PG 601 1723605680 Pendin 29.813
204 LOCKHART, ISREAL 6,7 DB 931 PG 601 1723609076 Pendin 31.540
205 QUALITY PROPERTIES ASSET MANAGEMENT 7,8 DB 14217, PG 1662 1722780727 Pendin 26.704
206 QUALITY PROPERTIES ASSET MANAGEMENT 7,8 DB 14217, PG 1662 1722684975 N/A 11.512
207 MYRICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF RALEIGH, INC 8 DB 10818, PG 1761 1722780311 Pendin 7.728
208 DOUGLAS, DEBORAH 8,9 DB 12059, PG 1012 1722781570 Pendin 2.979
209 BROWN,WILLIAM J JR 9 DB 11276, PG 1121 1722788048 Pendin 3.000
210 JASPER, LLC 9, 10 DB 11318, PG 151 1722776743 Pendin 5.932
211 BROWN,WILLIAM J JR 9, 10 DB 2966, PG 313 1722874774 Pendin 15.670
212 LYNN,WILLIAM M.&PATRICIA A. 11 DB 2160, PG 191 1713925869 N/A 0.370
213 CHEEK,JAMES E.&SUSIE B. 11 DB 2505, PG 616 1713926951 N/A 0.388
214 SANSOM,JOSEPH M.&SARAH S, 11 DB 2226, PG 316 1713928946 N/A 0.376
215 YOUNG,JOYCE P.&ROBERT 11 DB 13857, PG 1870 1713929933 N/A 0.248
216 WU, DEQING 11 DB 13729, PG 1925 1723020936 N/A 0.400
217 ADDIE MAE SHAFE&TERRI LYNN GIVENS 11 DB 10073, PG 2575 1723020967 N/A 0.091
218 ADDIE MAE SHAFE&TERRI LYNN GIVENS 11 DB 10073, PG 2575 1723021927 N/A 0.376
219 MICHELLE L. HESS,TRUSTEE 11 DB 12431, PG 2586 1723023906 N/A 0.290
220 MCPHATTER,MIRANDA M.&JOHN W. 11 DB 6376, PG 808 1723024919 N/A 0.262
221 GILBERT, PEGGY 11 DB 8619, PG 1464 1723034090 N/A 0.271
222 DONNA H.MONK&DELORAISE R. HINES 11 DB 12082, PG 694 1723036053 N/A 0.319

WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
NEW HOPE ROAD TO THE NEUSE RIVER
Parcel No. Owner Name Plansheet No.
1 BROWN,WILLIAM J JR 4 DB 2966, PG 0313 1722874774 Pending 15.670
2 BROWN,WILLIAM J JR 4,5 DB 13856, PG 2383 1722779064 N/A 32.666
4 BROWN,WILLIAM J JR 4,5 DB 2966, PG 0313 1722970983 Pendin 3.553
3 BROWN, ROBERT H 4,5,6 DB 2966, PG 0315 1722985086 Pendin 25.847
5 BROWN,WILLIAM J BROWN, ROBERT HOWARD 6 DB 167, PG E 1732071808 Pendin 10.061
6 BROWN,WILLIAM J BROWN, ROBERT H 6,7 BM 1998, PG 1599 1732085040 N/A 9.659
7 BROWN,WILLIAM J BROWN, ROBERT HOWARD 7 DB 2966, PG 0313 1732184069 Pendin 14.807
8 WALNUT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 8 DB 7488, PG 617 1732280344 Pendin 3.349
9 BROWN,WILLIAM J JR BROWN, ROBERT H 8,9 DB 6742, PG 31 1732289450 Pendin 18.958
10 WALNUT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 8 DB 7279, PG 745 1732284890 Pendin 1.973
11 FIELDCROSS AT EAGLECHASE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 8 DB 4265, PG 677 1732299043 Pendin 6.141
12 BENSON,C ALFRED BENSON,GLORIA J 9 DB 4651, PG 242 1732382859 Pendin 0.449
13 TOWNES, ERIC L 9 DB 12325, PG 386 1732383881 Pendin 0.990
14 RALEIGH CITY OF 9 DB 1988, PG 207 1732385548 N/A 3.170
15 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 9 DB 7650, PG 881 1732395138 Pendin 1.449
16 RALEIGH CITY OF 9, 10 DB 4602, PG 273 1732480863 N/A 24.824
17 RIVERKNOLL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 10 DB 4602, PG 279 1732491328 Pendin 3.696
18 RIVERKNOLL ASSOCIATES 10 DB 03492, PG 757 1732493368 Pendin 3.040
19 H J MORRIS CONST INC 10 DB 6846, PG 1030 1732488459 N/A 11.340
20 MARTIN,CHARLES EUGENE&BARBARA P 10, 11 DB 7200, PG 610 1732592042 Pendin 15.561
21 JEFFREYS,A J III&CHRISTY D 11 DB 6178, PG 405 1732584766 Pendin 17.401
22 ALMUS J JEFFREYS JR 11 DB 325, PG E 1732587444 Pendin 15.866
23 AJ JEFFREYS JR 11 DB 1137, PG 0531 1732680665 Pendin 30.042
24 WOODARD, LEAMON HEIRS 11, 12 DB 13436, PG 820 1732780525 Pendin 88.923
25 RB&ELAINE K HOPKINS 12, 13 DB 2038, PG 311 1732787516 Pendin 14.247
26 CITY OF RALEIGH 13 DB 2297, PG 255 1732779522 N/A 12.442
27 KAGAWA LLC 13, 14 DB 11131, PG 752 1732877886 DB 14393, PG 1241 18.328
28 HAMM,CAROLYN W 6 DB 12060, PG 0877 1732088070 Pendin 0.182
29 HUNTER, NICOLE 6 DB 10541, PG 2446 1732089042 Pendin 0.199
30 GREEN, LORRAINE&EMILY 6 DB 12426, PG 1705 1732089088 Pendin 0.197
31 BAZEMORE,JUNE I 6 DB 07486, PG 0548 1732180097 Pendin 0.212
32 JOHNSON, ELIZABETH ANN 6 DB 8356, PG 1512 1732182117 Pendin 0.172
33 ANZORA, HECTOR&ELENA CLAUDIA 6 DB 11423, PG 201 1732182243 Pendin 0.182
34 ELLEBY,CHRISTOPHER&ANNTIONETTE 6 DB 10593, PG 1053 1732182350 Pendin 0.169

ie
USAC�AID� DZ�Q# Sit�#5SJA (i�rdicate ou att�ct:�d�i�p}
;,�,� STREAM �LTALITY ASSESSI�EI�TT�'Y4RKSHEET �.._
Pro��icEe tLe foilu���ing fufoi°inatio��for#he sf��eain reacls�iu[ler assessme�#:
1.A�plica:�t's n�ne:City of Ralelgh 2,Evai�ia#or's n�sue:Charfes,fohnston
3,Date of��=altk�tio��: 315/09 4.T1tti�O�CYAI13��f011: ��;l 5 p.m,
5.Na��e uf stre��: UT fo Wc�[nut Creek 6.RiL•er basis�: Neuse River
7.Appraxu��at�draiu�age area: 8.,�tr�a�u arder: 1 s#
9.L�i�gt1�ofrearl��v�uated: 50 LF 1f3.Cou��tp: Wake
11.3ite coordi�rates(if kuo�t��n}: pref�r in decin�al degrees. i2.S��bdi��isioa s�a���c(if as�3�}:N/A
Latitude(rx.34.873312): 3 I.Cs�gilude(e�-77.55661i}: 7$.5394] W
h•fethod locatiof�determi�ied(circte): GPS To o Shee a(Aerial)PhotolG Qt�er GIS Other
13.LOCAit0114�i21C�I t111L�C CV�Ilk1fi011�llOf6 i1C�I�k}�fOAC�S Al1C�1�1Y1C�f12c9i�{5 1Rd Rftc�C�]ill�p 1(��A�1�111�SZf��1l1�S�lOC�Rt10I1�:
Approx, 2f��ff N�of er�d of Brandycres#Dr�ve
ld.propos�d cl�uuiel s��ork(if�uFy): unknovm at fihls tlme
15.Recent t4eatl�er couditia�s: no raln with[n 48 hrs
�d.Site eo�iditiatts at fuiie af�YSit: ll�arlC7n forest
17.ide:�tify a�i��s�erial�vaten3�ay classificatioias kt�o�vti�: _�ectioi�1Q _Tidal Et��aters �sse�ti�i Fislieries HaUitat
_Trout�'V�ters Outst�tdi�ag R�sotu'cC t�aters X Niitrieszt Sei�s'stive ZV�ters ,��l�atcr Supply��Vatersl�ed {I-I�trj
�$.Is tltere a pQi�d or lake located t;pstrea��t of tlie��it��tion pouit? YES 'O�If y�s.esti�nate tli�i��ates s�irf�cc are�:
19.Does cl��►suiel appear un USGS qt�d z��ap7 Y�S '� Ztl.Does c����u�e1 ap}�t�r oi�US�A Soil5ur�>ey? I'ES�
ZI.Eststuated t�aterslzed I�xd t;s�: 60°1a Residei�t.iat 10 %Canznierci�l %Isidt�strial �°lo A�irt�lt��ra1
�" �
30 °/a Far�sted °10 Gleared/L.o�€d %OE���r( )
22.Batiltfull��idt1�: 2' 23_Bnnls l�eigl�t{frosn bed to top of bat�k}: 1`
24.����e1 slope doS�n center of stre�ni: F1�t(0 to 2%) X Ci�i�tte(2 to 4°�a) Moderate(4 to 1�°to} �,Steep{�IO%) �
2�.C�v�iel si�t�osity: Straiglrt X Qscasio��al�tnds _�'ceq��es�t�f�ea��der Very sii�uat�s ,_,_,Braidtd cUa�is�ei
_ Inst�•�tetin�s fa�� romgletio�i of�ti•arksi�eet (�oc:�tect on page 2): Begin by detet�iut�u�g tlte tuost agpropriat� e�oregia�based an
loeE�tios�,terrain,t egetatian, str����classi�icatio:�, e.tc. E��ery el:arecteristie i�u�st b�scartd tuitig tlie s����ecore�iou_ A�sign�oii�ts
ta rac�i d�aract�ristic n�itluu tl�e r�u�ge sho3�-�� for t�ie ecoregion_ P�gc 3 pro�-ides � bsief descri�tios� 8E jip1V t0 f��iC�V tlie
rliaracteristics itlr�itified ui tiie����rksli�et. Scores sllould reflect An pvarall Assess7l���lt Of tlt� streai��re�el�ui�der evaiva{ioxx_ If�
cliarac#zristic ca:u�ot t�c cv�l��ated due ta sike or�veatlxer co�zdikioi�s, e��t�r 0 sn the scoru�g box uid pro��de ati ex�ia�iation iii the
coii��tie�it sectioi�. Ril�erc tl�ere ar�o���io��s ct��ng�s i�the ehararter of a strea�n its�der re�ie�(�.$.,t�1C SITC�111 fl0\�;S fFOill R�315t[tF�
into a forest),ilie strra�n snay be di�ided inta smaller r�acl�es tl�at display xnore cos�ti�y�uty,nnd a sep�rate fonn used ta cvalt�ate eacl�
rzael�. 'I'lie total score assigiied to t�s4rc�tt reaelx must ran�e l�ets�.Tec:�0 s+nd 104,1Yit�1 lE SCO[1`D�.I�U F��f�Sell�iilg R Stf��ill Of t�IC
�IS�ICSf(1itA�lty.
Total Scoa�e (fa•o�n i•ez•Qi'se): b5 Coan�neufss !
�
EE�aliiatai�'s Siguatu�•e Date 3/5/09
Tl�is chanuel rvRllt:ItlQII�41'll€ s i��te�ul to he�sec�¢nly ,15 1 �ti�Ll@�O :15S�Sfi I1t1[101�'ilEl'S T11[l @A171'plllri811t'41 17t•ofessio�als iu
gatl►eri�g the d�►ta req«irec� b1� tl�e t�tecl States A�•in�� CQt�ps of Eu�i�eet's tQ inake a p�•eIiinit�at�° assesstneut of strea�n
q��alih•. TIie tot�l scu�•e resultiu� fi�aun tl�e ca�npleiinu of fl�is fo�•iu is stsbje¢t tu USACE :►pp�ro��al �ud cIpes uat i3np1�� a
pa��ticul�r initi�atiau e^atin oa•reqi�ii°e�neut. Fortu st�b�ect to clias�ge--versioi�06/Q3. To Cosusue�t,please ra11414-876-84�11 x 25.
1 �.1 �

�TREAII�I QUALITY ASSES��YENT WORKSHEET
_ .„ -x � �-� � � _
a _ - � -
�` � �
� - � ��s�� - �
�
_ � P�eseu+e�of tlo't�^�ge��tent pao�.s�sf��ea� � 5 d� � �1 � 4
n�.flo��r.s�tura�i�n„_�? s��i floz�r, � �u�fs
�N ti � ��
, � � ���eur��f yas�h�nau�i�era#�ott Q � �: � ., �= �
�~ � -�- — �, �.: ,
=. .. � .._ � `: �xt��.��,ai�rr���n=.�,�o�1F�a�s��., :m�a� ounts.,.. ,,._.� � -�-� ���.__ � �
_ 4
! � '., � ?-s �; ✓ �43#1.1i7$II'��II� ' �: � �f �-'� �.� � .3
" . .:- nc�biiff�r �,e�n�i'.��sus,��cle tau�£�rr�m� �uiis _. . - ,
����en�e?nf�u���i�nt n� c�euj�ca��.seLar�es
�. � � � . ` � � � o �,�
,.:; . . ;. ����v��i€��clzar e��=�,�o,+�cliar es_., .�m.. � �
'� max ,�mfs �U; � t?�� � �� .�,. -.�:
� ' �. .' �K ' � aGtou�llt��a��e� �.s�l��rg� ` � � � �J � �` 4 4
..,.�'. .. ���:d�5cha_rge ��,.�rru►gs;�e�s�"���l�nd.s �fc.�-�Aoau�t�)..: _ .,___;.._,. _ _..: _.._.__.µ.._.._ ._ �. _ ��=--==::'
. �.� _ ,
� ; P��sens�o���l�centfl�4dplaut . � �3 � "..'� �' �� 0 � '
�_ _ ,:� u��v�a� la�--�l _cxt�iis�v���land l��==ma�c �tiaii� -� -� � _ ,F
. ... r...: .... - ... .�_.:: �.... ..-�. ..., ��c-�--
3
,� ', � �" �t�tt e��limeu���'foadpl�ui�ce�+�s; ; � � s � Q. � 3
,.- . � --
� �W;�en�ched ti; �nt�l���. �c ,��cs
���
� _ ��
, �� � �:
; � . . Pgesenc��f�d,�acent�etlands � � � � ,.
- .� .� ;.. � � U
, r�o�veflanc�s,..#�,Yar �`a�acent,��i'1anc3s ,rnax ,o�nt� . . .; ... �
_ � � 4
� ...,. ....::. .....:� � . ,.� . ., ,. ..��;
�a ,�
� - � ��aunel sinuos��� Q � 4 � � 1?�3 2
a �
�� �Xf��ve=c�►�ttratelaz�a�smn'-, i?;na�ral�anderw,;�x ..ouits _.w ..�
� �eai�men��npuf , , ,
:
� . �.
3
i�__� ���xtens�.v�`d ,msie�on "0�-`l�#���i�c�s�c�ient, �€ b�ttts ,^ ; � � ��' � . � �
_—
� �?. �
�� . . ::
�� ��ze���e�s�i�y�£�hannelbedsub�tra�e`� � �- � 4 � � ': 2
. ...___� _� .:��i�e_���a �ous� t3..�" �.�tv�rse��.��.m�c n"iu#S __� - �,�
, �:��den��uf��ann�I�u��sia�,�i ���d�niug � �
U � fl � 3
1�� � � d� ��cised x�,s�aGle�e���anks � c��n� ;: � "�
�. � _
: Ft��e�p€����m��oi �iank�'a�[�r�c 'f
: �x
�
f 3 ����e����sio� ���c��osto�stabl�bauk� inax �ufs ' � 5 �1 � €� � 5
; n
1�?. ..)
' �ii�l�[�£j]��1 a'ill�i�C�I1Si� tQll�3�II�{S f
��" 5�. , _ � � ' ��: i� � � ; .�
° r..w W ��r���al�raots,=-�i� �e�e�roots�u�hout : 4 �:
_��iY�x _ snts . �_...,. .'� ......
" ` �mpxc�b�ag���ulture, �4�stnck,�r#�m�e� ��c�cluc#cau � `
N �
I� .,.::. ,.s_u#istaut��<:. act�,�uc�..eua�de��� n�- �n1ts :� C1 5 t1 � 4,F � 3
��' Pr�sence an�r�ffle-�o��Ir�pp1�-p�pl camp�e�es � �° ' � � � � 1
�.�zo,�les��, ���ar .c�sils_. U��uell�`+r�e�! _etl... � .a�sts . :: ...._. ._�
� �17 �� �� `� ,�,�Hat�if�#�omples�t� ,. �, p �i ,. � � �?N � 3
- _Ut�et�raio;ha�i�at:,-.€�a f�:�uent�ran���a�t�fats�=�a�: 'o�n� ,;:
° �
�. p �` x � ���II[3��F C�1T�+�1�,�@��'�I����'9�1�?��: /� .fa
�fll'- � �� �� ,.. . . Y - .� � !/ � �E-, � _ ��, � cJ
- .,� —�nv�hadiug��ge�a���. _,�1 co��uiuc�u.s�auvP3' �,�Po�tsj �:
_-� �� �� �
� . 1�� � _ _ fe eu���decl��ss '� � �9- �? �� 2
��� � � �
" >,,::. ,.-�, . �e � �ilaeds��d,. �,�.o.nse. .st�.-iictur�e. ,�ax ._:� __...�.: � _ - . f �.�
N
P��esenee�f�h�au��nvert��a�af�s�s���ge�) ! ` i
��;::_ ....� ���rlest��.,�Qi;�conYmon,�iutuer��ks.,. .._ ...�. ciints % �__S 0� �
� 4 � 1� � I
��°' � , Pr�s�uce of�mplub�ans �� �� �`�� � r �
an
q .�µ. . � � �t��d�sz��. .Q,�ommon,,�uriieraus,�� � , �� oinfs _
4 1
� �� �` .� 7 : �i'i2hSE�1C�i1��S�1 r � � , � � � � � �
�, , _
�� � T __
�, . . ,. Il0�''Y1�IIC� �5!�t3IIlIIlOiL,]FllIII�I(3115.. �5,_ .31�7C .Q1I1fS..r....' "-` '
� �3 y �vsdenc�+af��t�l�'e use"` � 6 � � � �3 5 m �
, r �, �
_�:y. ; ._.��no���en���, �3,a�u:utantevttleane� .,��.. _.�n� �...�:.��._ . ,.� .. ._� .._�,4_ -____�: . .._._-�,_..�.,� �:-:
� t _ m. . :
. _
� ; ; � .� - - - b5
- �.. - _._
- � .. .a - -.. _._
�`'I`��ese cfiara�t�ristics are a�ot assesse�l in ceast�I streur�s. -
� , r
�

USAC�AID#� Di�VQ{# Site#5SJC(��laicate.on attach�d i�p}
;;�„ ST�EA�i QUALITY ASSES�I�ENT ��ORKSHEET �: , �;
Yro�zde tl�e follatiE�iug iuformation fa�-#he s#rea����eacL uncler assessment:
1.Applicac�t's�aine:Clty of Raleigh _____ 2.Ei'RZIk�fOP's uame= Chatles Jolnnsto�t
3.DatB O�NVBIt�t16f1: 3I�I�9 4.Tuue of evali��tio��:4;00 p.Rl,
5.Ntu�e af stre2m: UT#o Wa[nut Cr�ek 6.Riv�r b�siu: Neuse Ri�er
7.Ap�ro�ci���ate dr�ivage area: $.S#reaai order: 1 St
9.Le��gtl�of reac�i aval��Ated: 50 LF 10.Cou��ty: Wc�ke
11.Si#e caordinates(ifkflo►vtii): prefer in decimai drgrces. ��.Subdik�sionuan�e(ifa�:}):i�1/A
Latitude(ex.3�#_8�2312): 35.74824 N I.ongitudc(e�77.556611): 78.54234 W
hiethod facatian de�Eemiined{circle): GPS To 0 8heet lio Aeriai)PkotolG Ot��er GI8 Qther
13.Lvcatia��af reach tuic�r eval�k�sia��(�iote uear�y roacls�uid l�;�dmarks a�id attaeli►uap id�iitifyii�g str��n(s)focatio�r):
Approx, l OQ it Nof end of Rugust Wcsy
1�4.pro�sed chasuiel wurl:(if u�y): U�3known at tlnls tl�7le
15.Reeent��eatl�er cQnditiv�is: no falrt Wit�11n 48 his
I�.Sit�cosiditions at ti�ne afF�sit: ri aC1c]rt foreSt
i7.icte��tif}�a�ry sp�cial►vaterway class�catzofis lc�iai���: ��ection 1D Tidal iVaters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Oi�tsta��cls��g Resource�VRters X Nt1it1@35r S�IiSitiV6��rAL�FS �lrater Sup�rty W�tershed (I Ii�
18.Is tliere�go�id or lak�located t�pstreanz of tlie eti�l��atian point? YE� 'O If yes,estuuate tli�ivater s�uface area:
19.Does clrannel�pp�ar au USGS qu�d niag? YES '0 21J.Does cliatuie!ap�ear o�t U$DA Soit Stirvey? YES I�0
11.Estimated;�at�rslied lu�d usa: b0%Residential l 0 °.'o Coiiu�aercial �%Lid►tstriai ^%A�ric�ilh�ral
3� %Forested %Cleared f Loe,�ed _°/a Other
22.BankfiilI��idtlr: 3' 23.Baule kei�lit(froni l�d#o top of bzu�:): 2'
2d.C1��ael sto�do�uiz cc�ater o€strea���:�lat(�to 2%) X.G�istle(2 to 4%) Moderate(�ta lU°la) St�ep{�l fi°!o)
23.C1����el si�rc�osity: Str�igl�t �4ccasias�ai be�u�s X Frtq�z�nt��zear�d�r V�ry si;�«ous �..Braidtd el�uyj�el
Inst�•t�ctions fm• co�npletion of rrarkst�eet (lacatetl o� �age 2}: Begin by detesmif�ing t�ie it�ost appro�ri�te ecoregion based on
locakiv��, terraii�,�>�g�tation, stse�m rlassificntio��,etc. Every cFi�cterisric must�scored uss��t3ic sattie ecoregiou. Assign�oints
ta eatt� cl�racteristic \V1t�ifti t.i�e ra�i�e s�o��� for tlic ecoxegion. Page 3 pracides � brief descriptson of hotiv to r�vi�w tlie
cliaracteristics idr��tifier� in tl�e�varksli�rt.. Scores suo��ld reflect ati o��er�1I assess���e��t of t�se streasi�reacl�����der evaivatio��. If a
cliaracteristic cannot be eva��rated dt� #a sit� or w�at���r coF�ditioiis, e��ter 0 iu sl�e scari��g box A�id proj�ide an e�lanation uk the
conune��t sectiota. iVl�er�shere nre uUvzous change-s iu the character of�sfir�a�x��i�der revieu�(a.g.,she strea��flo��=s frota�a past�ue
iato a farest},itie streaui�i�ay b�divided into sn�afler reacl�as t��t disglay�iYiar�coiiti��uty,and a separat�fonu t�s�d t�ev�It�ato eazh
r�aci1 Tl��:total scorc assi�ned to �stre�n�r�ac��m��st ran�e 6�tsi�eei�0 a��d 100,�t�itl�a score of lOQ represeuti��g a str�aui of the
�11�185t C�lk't�1�.
Tntal Seore (f;•ajn i•e��erse): b2 Co�mneuts:
Et�alt�atar's Sign:tture Date 31�109
This clsan�e! e�:att�afipu tot•i iu en�l ta use�i on1S��s � g�icle tn assist la��doeti�►ai°s anc�enti•lro��ine�ttal prnfessinnals iu
gat�eriug tI�e tiata ��ey��irerl l��• tLe U ifed States Ai•ra`� Carps of�ugineers to �nake a pt�eli►nina��• assess�neu# �sf st�•eam
r��i:�tih�. The total scare t•est�ltiu� fin�n tE�e eoanpletiou af t1�is form is snhject to USAC� appro��ai aud daes uat iinply� :�
particula�^�uitigatiau rafia nr req�aireuiQUt. Fonn st�bject#o cliange—��ersion UbI�3. Ta Coi�mirnt,please call 919-876-8441 x Z6.
1 ��Z
�

��R�AN'I QTJAI�IT4'A�,�����TENT ��RKSHEET
,�� � � ��=�.�� .�.�� ��:,.� � ,��.
-��' � .�:. ��,�;„ „�.�������� �;�e.:� ��' -',��.,N,.e„�:�.. 'h°� �i����,..�.::��Y � ,..K:...���'� ��.� ��
v�- -` �=�."�" � �� . `,�""`: ^�'�"�." � ��`'-""b��"' ,.:,� „�„ .� �
-��
w" ':��,.;�;�€�v`��.�.�:�,a����� �,-�a.,`� v.�..,.��::��f„��..«�..r��-�' °'�'.`�, � x�.'���2u,r,.a,,.�:T�� ��J�����.
� 1 ; � P�.es�s�c�v�fln��/pet ststent p�aLs 3u sf�eain . - ' '
n��Isaw+�r�a�uaU.a� fJ sixc�� fln;v n�� ��nt� � � � � Q � 4
� xc�
u,�� -
� � �v�c�ence�f��,sf hunnan alter�t�on
� � • : . , - , , 0 =& (}--,S t�, � = 3
extensiu�al�era��x� �I �►a al�era�o� mTx ou��
� - ,- _� R�pai�an inne =
�� � - _ = � , ' U .-� , 0�-4 �- 5 3
` ; .: nrr��i_ffer �1;c��t�,.._��,�v�ci�bu.#�`er m�x c��ts ...
��,� ,
""� : E�s�deu���f�u#�en��nr�he�nte�I d�,scl�az g�s '' ` :
L � ' ;:.:,��ef�iv�c�s�ar es-={�,uo;�3sse�Za'. 'e.� <iiiax s��ts , ,_ � 5 4 4 i? � 2
� � ' ���nund��atei dis�l��� e � 3 fl' � 0: 4 2
t _ � _ � <
" m �no dsscl��rg� (3 spr�n�s,se��,��:t��d.s �tc �nax po�n�s) ; '
-�
�- � T �'�esen�e�f��j�cenf flani�Plain : � � ,�. � 0. �
�� . . :_. , . .. :: nv�'[avd.�.-=�,ex�e�s�ve=fla��d`�a�n ,�,:iiia�c ��nis .... , =
- ��.
?. 1
T,� ��nt���c��en��flQOdplaen ac���s
�
. ^
� � _ � 1 �n��ched �i; ent flond�a � oint � . � ' � � � � ]
� Presence nf�€1jacQnt�etlancl�
� � _ _,,s . : _ , __,_� _; � .. �a Q, 4 {�� �
��� �� � �no�r�tl�n� �},I�r e';a��cent�uet�antis � amts
�� _
r ; ��
�� : �l�ann�I sin�asity '
° � ' �_ ` _: �--•5 ' (D � _ �; 3 3
, �: �xte���'_chTt�uel�za;ti�n 9,tt�tu�t�l u�an�3�r `�nax o�ts . - ;
`�� ° �e�men��npu� �
� 10 ' �. : � ; _ �3 � �l-4 4 � 2
�� :. ,._ �xceusivs c�stt�oi�,�,�httl�;iirua.�e�ne�� :`�aac �n�s ".: , ,
� . :� �.:_ . . � � � � : �� ='���� - �_ . .. .,
__'u �� �az���►ve�si�yo uf�haun�zl bed�ubs�r3fe �" �"�-� �, 5 4
� u..:;, ._ fsuer�nIntc� eAO�_�;:1�' ..,c�vers�s�zes i� ouits � �� -
��
�
Eizdenc�4f�l��nnei�nc�s�on�i 1���le�iing
� �.2 . _, � t._. = �#=� �i-4 D � 2
� `, de, 1,��uc;seil �D.staUTe t�er1�c.li�talc�...�ax- �u�� ,, . �.; ..,:; :
.
s ��� Px��e�ce�fm�,�4r�s��tk����ure��
. . 1� � � _ i� � [t—5 �J' S �
t_ ���ev'er�.ert�s�ni�t. -.Q�a_�ro�on,_stsbl��� �a��ciin#s�.. ,
�� �� _ ` ` Roo�:�ep#1z�ncl densxtv saz��a�u�i ; 0 3 Q' �- 4: � 3
n�3tx��ile�€�ts.=.�3,�ie�is�r4ofs��rc�u ` o�c�.=.u�x ._._ints '
�.� _ � Impac�b���giicu�te�r� ;I��f+esfocIt,�� tun�er prnduct�€�n �
v� 1� ; � _ �, - ' �. : � fl �� � .. ..�'� �� � fl� � 3
� � . . :<. . �i�stan�z�l� act�?,nv.eu�cle�ce. . �; �u�s . .. ...._i ;.
-��� �6 , ���sence�if���f#�-�anU�ppi�-pac��t�mple.�es ; 0 '' � J ' , D' ,� U �i �" 4
� , n�r�ffl�slrt Ies�ar 4ceis 0,�v�11 de��l ez� s�ac ��nts
�� : � H�bitat�ou�p1Q�,�y
Y'� '; .� . _. r � �i � � �l 5 5
�.-:. : ��t1�or ns�habitat {� fr uent -�ar€ed�iab�tats t� ��nnts =.
��
�� - �aunp� +r�s>era�e+nver s���a�.nlhed' ' � 5 �' � t? � 5
'� ��zo_sh�diug��g�a#an U,con�uc�us�uapy �c paznts� :_
- - � S�bst�ate ein�iec�de�lnes� `� - - � i
- -
.� .��_: = d ; 1 eiiib�d��,,(},�aos�s�nict�xre .._� ' , � 0=4 (3_ �
u ���� .
�
_ �
�, ��-�M .� , . ..
�Q : Presen�e�of�Ei��m sn�*ertelat afes��e�p�ge 4) fl ' 4 4' � U � 2
, � : . -
, �.�...�lo�vic��,�e...,.[?,��m�o,�,s�u�eratis.: � ,:i� nuYts :
., . 2�_� �'�esance nf amp�xbi�ms � ' �
� � � !� � �3 4 0
� -.. �o�c3ence U;�ommi►n,nu�erous es raax c�ua#s :
.�- .
P�esence�f�'isla� '
-- �2 .', � i1 : 4 �-� U 4 2 ;
� i�o�u�t�nee �;conuiavn,nu�ers�us:" �s .?� osnts �
� _.:,_. � - €
." ' E��c�ence�f+�c��xidUfe�"se ` � ,
- �� ,� � - � "S ; il-S �-5 �4
_ .. _:. ---._,_ .._,no�denc���,abundaut��,ridence ��a�e snfi� _ � -; `
_ - - P����-��
, ` ; . `°=it �m - _ - --� � ���
- ,� - �� _ - ���F
� m.��... - _ b2
,� � �����-r�
,�� ��_ - - - =
*'I��ese cliarar�#�zristics are�iot asse�ssed i�co��tal str���i�s.
_,.-,�
�
�

5 �5��
USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate on attached mag)
;,�„ STREAM QUAL�TY ASSESSMENT W�RKSHEET ,._.�- .
r<=
�ro�ide the following fnformation far the stream reach uuder assessment: .
1,Applicant's nama:, ��F�!o x zat����� 2.��aluator's name: �1� �.rS 1
3.Date af evaluakion:,� � ��O`� 4.Time af evaluation: A,M• _ __
5.Name of stream:_[�'� A1,�.,�' �'A�EY 5.River basin: �i�u��� �
7.Approximate drainage area: 8.Strea,n order: Z
9.Lengt�of reach evaluated: D' 10,Caunry: ��4�e�
1I.Site coordinates(if knor.vn}: prefer in decimai degrees. 12.Subdivision name(if any):
Latitude(ex.34.$72312j: F/�7¢��� Long'ttuda{ex.—77.556fi11}: !�. ,�f���
Method locafion deterznined(eircEe): GP5 po She � enai Ph IS Other C`iriS Other
13.I.ocation of reach under evatuation:(no#e nearby roads a�arks and attach map ident�fying s�ream(s)�acation}:
� /sL �3rva� �OA�> .�c�.4D .
14.Proposed channel work(if any):
15.Recant weather wnditions: C��t� ' .
lb.Sita conditions at tima of visit: C���
17.Identify any special vvatenvay c�assi#ications kno�vn: _Seckion 14 „�,Tidal Waters Essentiai Fisheries Habitat
,_._,Trout Waters Dutstanding Rasource Waters ' _Nutrient�ensitive Waters Water SuppIy Watersbed {I-IV}
18.Ts khere a pond or lake located upstream of the evatuation pain#7 YES NO yes,estirnate the ivater surface area:
19.Does channel appear on USGS quad rnap�N� 20.Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey YE NO
21.Estimated watershed land use: �°10 Residential %Commercial %Industrial %Agricutturat
7�%F'orested %Cleared 1 Logged _%Other{ )
22.Bankfull widtli: /�`� 23.Bank height(from bed tv top of bank): /�
24.Channel slope down center of stream: _F1at(0 ta 2%) �G�entle(2 to 4%) ,_Moderata(4 to 1Q%) _5teep(>l�%)
25.Channel sinuasity: Siraight >C�ccasional hands _Frequent meander �,,,,.Very sinuous _Braided channei
Instructions for comple�fon of�vorks�eet (Iocated on page 2): Begi�by detem�iuing the mast appropziate ecaregion based an
locatian,terrain, vegetation,stream classi�ieation,etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecarsgion. Assign points
to each characteristia within ttze range shown for the acoregion. Page 3 provides a brief descriptian of how to revie�v the
characteristics identi�ied in the`�orksheet. Scores should refIect an overall assessment of#he stream reach uader evaluation. If a
characterisNc cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, anter 0 in ihe scoring box and pro�ide an explanarion in the
commenk sechon. Where there ate obvious ehanges�the eharacter of a stream under revieiv(e.g.,the stream f�ows fro�a pasfure
into a forest),the s�ream may be divided in#o smalIer reaches that display more contin�ity,and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range bet�veen 0 and 1(}0,with a score of 100 representing a sfream of the
highest qnality. -
Total Score (fram reverse}: ,-�i.� Comments; �
s
�vaIuatar's 54gnature - Date 3 �/d9
This channei evaI�atian form i ntended to be used on[y as a guide to assist landawners an�3 ne�ironmental professionaCs in
ga#hering the data required by fhe United �tates Army Carps af�ngineers to make x preliminary assessment of stream
-. quaIity. Tha total score resulting fram the comptetion of this forrn 9s subject to USACE appro�val and does nat imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change—version 06/03. To Comment,please call 919-876-8441 x 2b.
1 '���J

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W�RKSHEET
� �� C # �_ : PQ = �.� G
� �_ o .
�a . � � e mon 'o n ai
�� �:��-�"'` �`PI'05�TlCeO�fIOWI�]@rSI�fCIlt�I40�81115fYe�i11. � '` � `5�, '�� �'��.•� �" ��-��'���i
.�,-� �� x. � �� � � � � � o s� o �� , : 0 5 3
��-�".;_�_�;� --� . IlD�OW:4I Sa�UC`cIt1011 �'S�1'fl21�i�0��ITI'dX�OIIifS � � �`����-.u._;H,`3.��. �� ��'����°�:t
',.2�',���r '�- �Evidertc�of past'��naan aIkerakzott,���" � �`� �``��� '���� ����:.-. �
���.:�,-'�`����<:�CX�ClI$1VC'al��TafID��U;:IlO�ItCI`d�IDll����aX 6�f8 ;. �:, "�,6' •_; ,�,� a $��" a�;�� �s- '`
�� '� �' '? ��� ��� � -��R�pa..�an zone�� �.,#�`�z-���� �. �a-�` '�`����4,:K �,°�w.�n'�:'S z��'�"�'. �
���.�-. ''_�� �- � .�,. '�;«, < ^�.. G �c:
���.,� ����:�, �o buffer,.�0�contiguous�v�xde.�iuf£er �m� oin�s) ,. �...,�,.� . "
�. s>-. :�:�.
�.�`""s. „� �- - -. y . ti� .. ,Y. � �- � -�-s:�. �4-� �'.-. .P =�'`i ��„ �c.�r„��-;�.�` v-.
=x ��dentce af nutrsenf or che�cal djscharges (� C> I� A � �
� � �: �v� ',�v'�:,o- `�.- ��,.� ,7�.\ `-' � k L�g � J \ �-- � U -`F;-� r,�Y � �. �
�• 4s�r � �`�_�CXtCi151Ve_(�ISC�l�' 05r,�,Q�IIQ C�1SCIlafgPS., _:I178Xi O1f1fS� _,.: v '�.f '�-?z�a�'`'��x�2'`-��=��"������:�:�
�¢,fi�.
�C� .�`�.��'�".-`-�� .y�'kUrqundwa4er'd��cbarge �� �'�� a���-. s��.n� � �, '�`"-��-� ��. v.'�' �'i��'` -� ✓J
r�J�� ��_ �.:�`�.b .e ,.,:� '��Y����Y�e .:-`� :?.tr�'�"'��3:�� �: �„��.3 �x�`� ,� �`Y .�'`z,�„ ��'*�a,' !r
„>�;..a_ �_ np�i�ischaT ���,:s �n s�see s,.wetlan[�s atc:,-,max om#s s __. ,...� ..___��-��__._�,. __.: �._;n.._.��a�..�v:
- .�a�'����.�s�a��,��TCS811C0Of`RdjlCClltfI00[��I�HITI.=.�`i���y-��"��h x � O �; �-<�� � �-'�Q � �T� �O� �� z'
�' � �----°` � _s �� s '� t �E•o ._� �,� �3�}> .�cr �i�,is r�-,�-� �z � �
� . ..�..'� a
� _.v ,
�.�-�;:� �.�--�: ?EO flood".l�m O,,extensrvefibod"ia�...� olhts�,,,�;_���z.. ,�.�-�, -:���'�;�.-�.._ ��„��,����:�•��
: � ��������Entrenchmen�l floodpla�n access� �4. ,� � 5 � _.��� E ; `� ` k�
�,�s -.���� �? `��.:,�� � �:s��ti �� z �tai. � „' �:. c�.�-: � � - �' �y �„ '�� � ���-x �
��_ .�;�;. .-_Cdee ly_entrenc�ed;�,0 fr uerif-flood�ng=:ma�c�"`o�ts�..r:: ._,_..�. �:. �. _. �..o-� _ �
��'S,"_' � �`�,������'Presence of ad,�acen�wetlands ' � ;�~ p ��•�A� �°.�'��������0�2��a
�_��� �,
�� '� 'i- =-'� �,.�`� _��.�-. ��x'�.-.:� ��_ �-..:v . ; � � ;� �,:n a ..
��.����� rio.vte�lan�s 0 �ar e'ad'acen�weElanc�s ;'�vax� om�s �.�:: ..., ,. � ;$. �T�_,_�,,.-��a..�;;
���'e'�y��.��������`�''� _C}1`d�I1I1Q1 S1i131U51�s�'""..�a.����`� e ' � ��,Q 5���v����-s �s Qz 3�'��
��� � _�
�'. .,� � , �� �_..u � �
�s -r �, '� a � i
'�•�-:--�„_ exfepsive channei�zahon,;�0;,naiural;m�ander_.max: ou�ts).�`�,_�.����h�z°�,:��.�;:F�'�:��}���-�'��x
�'YS'`+�' .. ��'C�"t' . C1��YS .. .�{ - � L,a S' � � T \ . � '?§. �\ � 4 � �4 �� � hF.:
�0����; ,�'� ` �Se�,d�men�inpuf�-� �.����- � , ��'t 0�'S ������� '4�����d�4��=� �-
��i± �,CX��� S1V� � O51�lOa--.0,Il �P.OI If0�SCC�IIIIEIIt:.=ITI'h7C��OlI1�S .,.i . ,..a��_.�� ,�.',��,�-a.� — _.....�`:.�`��'� ..,:
��. �t � �...:. � ,�-:r �.e ��- s�.� t�rs., -a- � �� 2� _� '� �. s ` � .
��„���°�-Sir.e 8rdiversity of channel bed subsixa����x.�.� �'��`���x�' _``���
�11�,.�� ��. � -;:_ �� � z �_ �. �:�>,. : : p 4� :..0 5 -,_ �
�r��, � �ine �vmo eno s-0 jar � diyerse_s�zes_ max qin�s.�:; �;�.'��,���� ��,,��.�:�,��.�
�----�—�--- �__��_,�.� . _, __ __..--
�"� ��E�dencg of ch�nnel inc�s�on o�'�demng� � � � ���` '��'`'` ��-����-3�i � ` �-�.
�l���y� dee I��icssed�,=:0�s�able<bed�&:banks�,��max'oinfs-��,..:��.�������"����4� �<�'�""���.���
) _�. �==�.-h. _��. Z
�'�-�����Pr`esen s ofma or bank fa�iure`s � �r`��` �' � � �}� �'`� �� � ��I!��Q��
� �ati'�',^i w'�,�'°'b��'`��"�c .��f-..'4-� ��-e.k�, y�s-,�`4`'L`x¢�t'= `=�s,.�:_e��Q�� 5���:�xc�O S��'��_�U�S�-�.`'�'�.� �
. s.
�
, s�v,eie elostOnR. Q �no eCQS{vn s�able ba�s T max'��m�s ,��� _>�.`^..,�_.`� �` �``r�������,��.���?��'�
�� �a3?a-s�„ � t � s s ��. �� �s.- .,s .-� -�.
,: �,�'�Root dep��an�d�nsity-o�baz�ks��t�-•c� ti + 4��"`�''�-r+`�����s�`��� �.k.�'° � _•s��a-.
�4 �� ��: �- �.���. . 0 3 .� � o ��� �-. � 5 Y .� -�
��Y��a II04�lSlb�e�'Q�����'d�3.���e:�[opfsthXqughou��AI21$X _Q11itS�.�_'`?"_��a.s.._.�_. �:�.�+ �'�,�_.�.`3�. :�;.�'.�-��.;'����s
'��"mpac£�gricu3Eure l��estock�or ttmber Aroductton`� �"�_�������`��� �������' ✓�
'� �� ��`� 'C�����=F�a �i'�S�cr����°`"-�. �. ,�..�°n �' � ��-'S' �- '.,,�,.�� 4����c���g ����'�� Lr
" �. � Su�Sfantial�m a�=(fFnQ��dence�:�nax ��n#'s�����,'�az"z��,�.'�`�.�`���R�-� .�`.��''�"�-i..�. �x��,`��,�•'�^�.,-��'
�- -s�� �`€3 res�nce of riffl�OO�YI��IP��106I C6II1j1�8XCS:���-� � �; �`k���c, �����`J� ^������
t _. �-.��=��. »��.tz�����.�� o�����o � � ��.6� Z
::� .o�. .es�r'i'�1es,o�c ,�o�s �D �vell develo eci_-'�nax om'�s£�: ,..z.���;f:� ��:=����� �°."`.��r,`,``��.�����
��kita c�m� xi � � .:��-�`���� ����-.€,--°��' �
l� oc v�ha i ��0;fr�e�n�var�ie� a.�����`����,�_����.���.��.,... �..�.��.,� .�
.��,:��;�,:����-x� . , -� � �-�
�� � �`Canopyyc� erag ayer stre�mbed��'�'���`�`'�� ���� � �,_, a �`�`y
. 1&� , �. as�,�- ��`�,.`-'�.s,�.�� �.'���'�-�-,�.�-a���"�0�'5�a. ' Q�`�`�. �' �` � �
. � s �
�, qAsha�n �e efa''hou,. 43 c�n��nuou�Catio y� �ax U�n�s ,� �`����..�� �����_�� ,��.
-�$�v.s i�����mbe8d��n s � �� 4 � 0 � � �
ee em��c�e�,d-0�.,0 �e �c�`€ur�e�ax � � .�„ gr _�. -
_`� �%��= e-^a�c�..^� �--.��'� . �v -.��:a,.�-z .�-�'��.',�`-��,°`�`���-ar.��� � � �, �.
�, _ P�esence of�freaminvertebra�es see paga 4�.� �� . '� � ��'��'��-���"�
�.� �,h �� �,� ;� �p� �p S �p� 2
2��naeev3de�ce�",0"�c�o�min" ��'�'�"n��`nu��rous'-`��ih�.s�`��;:���,v_�,�_ ��,..,��
�^-.�.�i�SCtir.,�``��:������y� � � ..� .5,�� �ti'���'� u .� -z`�y.i.,� ��.�- ���a.��� r� 'tZ �� "..L..�
� �`lr���������`����`�C'�'�$o �mphlblan����������"��._,��*T���t��`����0���'�50����!' �,
c .^r° �� �` " �� �fi .e�. . � -,��«+3v',.�s'>�'�� +.�\�-°
��-� � _, �io_�vidence, 0;common;numerou� es.-max ou��s .�; � ..:.,:���...-.. ,-��...-�:. r� �.����-:�<.�_,:
�� � h�� ��� �����
�-`� ��Prese�c uf fisli �� -���� � � �; �
�22������.�-���.����.��w��-�����'���;0�`�4����-�0���- _ � 4��`;
� �no,�,y�dence�.�U;ca�mn�ntTmerous. e�.=max ouits �,���,��.;�:'�.���.��'� . .�w��
d s ; z � ��_ � �, ,� � �.-�� � �� ���,. �.�
Evidence o��yildLf�us�z ��� } '�
�"��_ ��z�a �'��`. :�3-7����"�'�".`�!v�°����'r��'�Z � e<2 "4�� �y�s,` �S.. 3 -� �y�-;�, �..��` �
`� _ ....~..�'Qnv�,. V�, ., � a�?�? 'A ��'s° �
�� : �o�ev��en � U,a n�antev� ence,,max omis s.�,�-�, : �-��';���� �..���_ �`��.��
m -o si
��
�*'�ese aharacteristics are�tot assessed in caastal streams. �
�.-,,, .
i� . ,{..::ti z .
,� , ..
I

J��I�
USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate an atfaehed map)
.. .
., a.�. � .� ; : ,.:h: : . , ' , j ;� ;� : a� .. , .
„�„ STREAM QUALITY AS5ESSMENT W4RKSHEET ��` .
a _ _ . -
Proyide the follow�Rg lnformatcun for"Ehe s�ream reach under assessment �;,�. � f
�1:Applicant'snaii�e, x -�'q�`d���l�a/� _'_ 2:Evafuatar'snari�e ��/�i�.d :,,.�✓�' ) �`_�
,�� � , �,t,-, f„ _
:� ,.: .
3.Date of evaluation��-�� � �9 � 4:Tifne ofevalua�ion �!� , . ` ,�
.
.• ,., -.
� ,
,�.—,. . .. _ _ __
. _ . ' � � ;
.�, . , , ` �z�
• S.Namaofstream: ` � L+�At�vus �> 6..Riverbasin: ' ` i�'r.(�� a .
, _j . , - .-�. � . . . .- .
7.Approxima#e`cEiainage area: S.s���m o�a�x: I=� F�: 3
� , ,
9.Length ofreach evatuateil, SO' . �1t1 �ounly � . " _e''' f-_ `
• , _ ,. � , , �
Il,8ite coordinafes(if known): �� prefer in decimal degrees, 12.Subdivision naine(if any): : .,>j �`
, ,
- . ..__ . .. .. _ . ,.., .
I,atitude(ex.34.872312)::'? �•5 7�� �[' Longitude(ex� 77.SS�i�11):�'•:.�f� 43�9 r`
. :s,�-� • _
Method locati€on cieteraiiued(circle): CPS po Shee rt o Aerial)Photo. �< Qther GTS i i Othee,. : < �'� ' .
13.Location of reac�uuder evali�ahon(note n�aZt�°ancl-tandmar es�nd atiacl�_�nap�dentifyin�stream(s),loGation):
. . ' . . .. ,f': r '_�ylx . ,�.4 � F
JV� a�' �A��d.V,dt d�vf�, ja',�1�d r> I1lz. " '
_. - . . � . . �r i, �.�.:�-. . ,� ,. rE., .
r _ _ - ,. . � _ . .. . .. . ..._ ... ... _. _ .�'
14.Proposed channel�york(if any):�r��r.,its-•.�J � _�'..�. ••a. -
< 1, �:
}, s, ; �. .,�.� . .
�. 15.RecanE�r+ea�er conditions: . G'r�,yiz - . ' - - -
' tF' c1,34 -. I , -F. • � y. �
l.b.5ite conditioris at time of visif: . •, �;, , t ° '
I '_ '_ ._ �... ..—_t . _ . . ' .. __. _ .� ' . . 1 ... i: -��:
17.Identify at�y special�vaten�ay classif"teations known: , Saction 10 _ ._' Tidal.�Wate�s'� ^Essentsal Fisheries Habxtat
1� :�i
� Trout Waters �_ - Outstandiug Resource WaterS.-' NutnenE;Sens�ttve:Wat�rs ��� <�Water�pApIY,�Vatershecl � (�I�;;',
. . f� _[t � `� 3` -�t` ':+`-.4'�'��-�� ; j s,.,.. ', : . ' ' - .,.`,- .� . , �,� . �„ . . �,::� .;
18.Is there a pond or.Iake�qcated upstream of tE�e evaluation point`t �YES,NO If yes,esti�►ate the wakef�sui�k`aCe azea - �
.- _ . , . . : i�"�It ,-3fe '!l '., .J-.. � .- .�t:'. f .,-...!-. '� �.�; , . �.{
19.Does channeI appear on i7SG5 quad rnap? 'i'E���� ;20,Does ebannel,appear_.qn U�DA Soyl Surve}tl-,,�X�S�b � `f
_.. - - , s"�
- . - - ` ;, . . mfnerc�at. ' � � >�� °10 Indnstnal` _%Agri�cultural ,��i
21.�s#unated watershed land us�:. ;�%Residenhal °/a Co y {
. . _ ..ir�. �,�1 3� rr . r -li�� '�Y� f �`J31�� �� .c. I!
. ,_. �4. - ���'o Forested" _%Clear !Lo ed .., F to Otlier .:a __. -- - �_,r
> i � . . ,, ; � '_ �g — ..
.. .,- , . .
�
,. ,� ii . ' �
�
�2.Bankfiill width l S. _ , ` ``23 Bai�he�ght(frdm hed tci top'o�bank)'' �- = ; ..!
_.._ . . . _.
- . , :^1Sf ( ,• ": �i�t�i -1 7''. -nl [- �x f j F�3nf r9,� � r�
� 24.Channel slope down centez of stream: Flat(0 ko 2%) �Gez�tle(2 to 4%) + _�M9derafe(4 to��0°/a) , :_Steep;(>IO%).�"�
, .. --- - - - _-- _ �_ .. . _._ ... _ . W ,� , : I
� 25.Channel sin�xosity, � Straight��`�Occa�ional bends _�iequerit mearider � Very'suiuous''"'� " Braided channel�-,�
' ` , .� i ��.p�,.•y. .: _ ,. �.r , j , i�.i:�F1 �si��l- .�� i t y_i".
Insti�ic�i�ns for campletion�f fyarks�ee�(located an page 2): `Begin by determining th,e,ri�.ost appropnate ecoregion'i�ased o��,
, location,terrain;�agefation,s�ream classi�ication,efc. Every c�aracteristic must be scored�smg Ehe same,ecoreg;on, •Asslgn pa�n�s�°:
' to each characte"r�shc wit�iri the ranga-shoivn for the'ecoregion. �age 3 prov�des a:ibnef;desgnption of liqw to review ttie ;
charactaristies identified iti the i�`vor�'sheef, �coz�s"shou��d re�lect an overall �ssessmei���f the.st�eam re��b,,yunder evaivatton If`a'
eha�acter�stic cannot ba evaluatec�due"to site�o��we�t�e;conditions; enter 0;in�#he sco_xin�b�o�,�and•p"ro"v�de an explana�an m tlie`;
�� .:
couunent sechon� Whe.ze�here are ob�io�is chauges ui tlie charact�r of,a st�eam under;eview.{e.g.,,the.str:e�m flows fram,a pas#ure?a
,,. : � .
, inta a forest}�tlie strearii"may be di"vzded into smaller ieachas�fl�at dtsplay,:more conhnui_ty;and.a separate,,form usad to evaluate eaci��:;r
' zeach, The tokal;scoie assig�ed`to a siream reach must�ange be�ee�i 0 and�l,00,�yith.a s�oFe,;of 10�_representing.a stream of t�i�'� �
, highesk qualit�: ._. ._. .. . . : ' . .sc ,r.s� ._��:.., . ... . .,;` i
3 i; ; :� - �.� „ , !, .� ,,.. � r i �
.:.. . � ,
.� . . .. • ._: .__. �
Tatai Score (f�'om7gVersB). ���, -- -Coiiimentsi` " :,�.`:
r, . :.� � J F �� .� ., - �E:i i
. - - ' _ _ ' _. -- _-- ' � —,�
. , , �
--- _ , ....... _.... - � _ _ ... ::-
�,.<<-.
1_ f ` � I' , . r , ' - - _ _.
:
, .
!. ,_, . ' ; . :! _ . .' s. -
� .� � b
_..' . , Y:, ,�.S,il .. . . 3{ i .F l�...y ':.� � "' - - � �:.�
� :Y . . 7 .-.f ,+ - ' .
7� 1:': .' ' j _ .
„ f .. 7 q
;' �V'�1.�lIU[OC�S��gI18�1�e _ � S-�.ir : .' ' '::: I_:� rr�. .� pate r . ' S�� �/' �. � . ...— 1
_ , .
This channel evalaahon�foran�s�i tended to be:used only as a gu�de to assi"st Ia�Ido�vners and e�nv�ronmentai professsnnals in�
gathering fhe`data-'required`liy the�Unifed`States"Ariny Corps of Eng�neer's ta inia[�e a preliminair a��,e�sment'o�str��m'
-; quality. The total score resalting from the comQletion of this form is suli}ect to CJSACE appro�a�and c�oes not iinply a -
part�cular mitigation ratio or requirement. Porm subjeot to change—version Ob/03, To Comment,please caIl 919-876-8441 x 26.
. 1 5��
E

. , , ;�,� :
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1�_ . . .� . . ,
. ` . . . . , . . . ' . . . ' �� � '�. �'.. � ,i . . ��� �Y'� '�f
�.{
� _�i - il"l.g .l.,' ' O - ' - � .£ � �� <_� � c_`. :,�'. . � � ;
oas e mo7n
�������P�esence offlow'I pers�stent pools m stieam ' `�- '^ ���������:�.-��-�-������� . •�, , .
�Ia� �. � ��.._ ::., s . ., �-� a 5 � � �� ��. �,�� ,..ty 0��,5w � .
����..... :..:noflofv,orsatura�ton.><.9's�'ong;:fiow._�ax ou�ts}..,.. ..�. � _, .,. ......., � .�:K����.�::.����.-� . l
��' . E�denc�aP�asfh�manal��rahon ti ' rt :���='�-�I��fi�"'�;�� ti•'�^C� �-
,�z , �
_ �� _....�� ,_,,:a -.-: '�„ :'r Z-v4� �?\..:�?�". -�� ti V.as� �-. r"v.'U'�e���",`a'�'C\� ��^s.�`�� .t7'��� ��.� ,
,....� .���M. extens�veal�era,�ton_. _�1�,uo altera�o�.._max au�ts, ��..:.� ..�_. ., ,���_��`��:�t�.3�,?
�`3r��� �z�-� � �� \ Rl�l\Rl"�flII ZOIlO`,e������� x �,�,�� ����„'-'� {�*'�.�����ti�����'C .
� ��„-�C���,,.I10�Ii�PI .O'COI1�Igt1Q�15'�Ylde.�7UffCLs. IIIaX. QII1�5 � ?,''`va s r: � ,-���:��T+va
,_:.__ ___ ..._.,, „--.:.. ��.�„>x: �'.��`��.,..-°.,� a.<x..,:-Z,.:.t
�'-�.�°�� � E�zdence of nutr�en�or ch'em�cal d�scharges.:� � � � �:��������`��.���<�� J��
4 � Z. �.\ k ;k i �z ��.E �i.� �� Y � �. ���r: �-y^
t.��.. '_v��_� _ ,P.X�0IISIVP,(�1SC�l&X�CS�._� X10 f��SC�aCgCS. ..112dX Q1i1fS� . ._:ziK�_':#4'�i�,��`_�"�`%�.-�=�3�`.�- u`���'�'�.��"��.. . �_ .i !
� L ..� .� .- . .-� ,- , � -�� �, � ,��a�"r-�� ��..�.r.
� �x 5 `�E� � Grou�dwater d►schar�e � !� �`�s�A�- '� ��_
�� � ��,s .�� G�_� e � .:� av _?s- y� ���a��=-�`�`� v z. �v�'��-.�:���,��Q�'T`�� �� ��"��.��` � ,' .
2 no_disc3�at ���,s iin s;see,�t�retl�nds,e�cs �m�e omts - �»��:��E.,�.�.�.�r___�� �.�::,-,.�..
' ` ' ` _ "Presence of ad acen�flood�fla�n� ��-•`���a \2. �s����"? ��z '�"��'�s������ . � �
� `�. �, �-�-^-' ?.T� '-'� . � . Y , '�a�. ti`��F � ��'� � `� �!
.__..
�:�;���,?; iio�#lood lain._D;exf�ns vef�oo�#�Ia�, ;�ax ouits ��._�.����-fl����� ��������������`� .
2 4 �� � �� Entrenchment 1 flaodplam access � . � � ` ���'�� ��"" �" �: ' �
��� ���dee i entienche'd'=0'fr"`"uenf floodm `'<�nax-'oin�.s•`����,���������-��;`'�'��`�.Q���
��`�� ���,;�y�.��� �I'resence of adlacent wetIands. } �-� �.� >.���''��������'-�`�� . . • �
, � p �� �� Q 4,� � 0 2���
� . ... ,.. � _.,
�8 � ���� now��lands. 0 .��t e�ad'acett��wetlanc�s_>_rna��otn�s .� ... _,__�: .��«. ..��,_��.'.„�_,�';�h��.�=:���a�.�-.-� - �- ;
. ._.._ . . - -_. � �.
�`-5.'��`T--�_�"�y�.�.��„?�\?, w :.; s-.. � ��.�.".� -,-���`��xr\ ��� ����'
� ChanneIsinuosii.y . � `�, � �,.
� 9 � � �. �� �,�-�. � Q 5 =� 0 4 � � a 3� �
a.,�..�r:�. �xteus�pe cliannel�f�on 0,:nat�tr�Iineander_ max:-a�nts},. ..�..-.-P,_ �.n,..���..-���.���,;���.����� . �
'`"^` `�� -� � 4 5'@(�1II1CI1�lIl 1�� � � $ ��.�,��`� �`� �*��"���•��v.t `•"�..: .
�10.,���;,�e_.�nsive�d o��f�ori=0„h�tle or o setl�meut��max:po�nfs):;<' �`0��5���;�0����.��s �����A���� `Z .
�"�� �����5��&diversity of chanuel bed suhstrate�� ' z ������ ����'�5��`� �
1� ��-,ti��z �I118.�10Ill0'SIIQUS`;�;,�� ��f ��.�lYe�$e StzES.,.ITIaX OII1�S} a.> ,`�-'.�:_?�a���,.� �a•,����c����� .. .
� � � �� �x�'�de�tce of c�ani�ei inc�s�on or mde�ung, ` � � �:s� � .`;0��4-�� � 0���� 3 .
������`��aee 1''�"ine�sed :.0;sfable:bed&lianks, max''oiilfs} � °�-� ��:_, �� „�����'��.�.`�.�`.�� � . �
� `�� PY4'S@llC8 fl�IllA 03'TJallk fAII[IYCS a. �y� ;3 ��s ����'�,�'�`' � ��\'£ � q
�1s�� ���.�. . � �`�� � � z« ��z ; ���o��s����0�5��������� � �3 � -
-� �,��.-> -.�_.se�e�re'er6sian� . O,:ao et6sibn sta6le banks..=max poants �......�..����������.��.��.�? .
i�a�� ^'��. ` . �` : _.- .. � t�_ : 3 ����-{��.���`�-�-3����y �g ��,a. .:�.
��� ,s��` ���.�� Roat dep�h aud de�tsify on baz�ks p� 3 .,�, p`'��} �;, �'� ��5�� .3
� .
..,�,.,,� , � IIO�IS1�3��Y00�f..�;denseroofstbroughout.=max D1I1tSj._, ' '� .,,4.�'�-l.z,?�.n`�cx.�.,��.`�.'c�����`i �
� ����lli 'dC�b�A �1CU�tl1I'B hirestock?brhmber �roduct�on a``� �`y � �`� , ��.� ���^�`x��,��-�`-��-'c�s�- '
� ���-'�� �„�, � � f � ,� � _,_��; - z�..�.�' Q - �� ` e d ��� �r�i �S`w , �. .
��v�- ���'z , ��.i� �� •- � ,�� r� ��a --� �"���� � s �
� .�.€� ..,� _. su�stan#��Iun ac�-0,_�ioevidence .max o�nfs 5,:�,�-�..,z��_�- � ��-x��.�� '' =
�. �,
� ��'��Presence of r�t'fle�oo�(nppie-paol com�C@zes �•�•��'`�:� :��� '� ;.���'�
�16�� � � ��.�� ��� ,� .�. .n �, � � �. �0�3 �
�,�`:��.no r�ftle,sln�. les oz 'ools.�.0��vell iievel_o ed _m�`om�.s ;� : ,;� ������� /'
�� r� 3 ��"���ab1�a��COIIi��BX1��� �'��'•'� � �� �`� '����� �'���� ���ti�"� ' , � t
��,F � ����.� :� .�� �.��� � �:, ��:. � �� 0 �-����- t�� 6 � A b � 3„
_� ittle:or no�a6�tat ,0;fr uen�varieii�a�iifats anax omts ;r��:�yz�����... ,; ��z. .„�.�
��s�s-���.'���Canopyco�e`rage o�er streambed� z� ���z� �`��`i��1�\ � {� ���" �.a,`,�`�,q�°��-��' � y '
�����(no shadin��e efatioii�. fl„con�int�ous cano y- .ina�c"'oin�s <,�.���� e.a., j`.��.��:�._.��..� '�`�.�
s�� �r�-„�. r�5`U�7S�1'A�B QII1�J��[�C�IIC&S ��t�� �� ���'� . :��� �. , �a�"`'�*i�"w.�, � �.- , , . "-
7
���� � �^. �-�'v �� 'x`i-�'s�..���,.,�-.� :� s y��_�y .�„y�' ,� — '� Q� r•�,� ,
� .
, �.� �,, �e.e..1 .em�ieilded,..U�loose struc[ure5-majc :�'� -��� �, . '' � �:
S.3� �.�_,
�� '�� �p �2��--tiV � . - �� � y,�.�S=�L�: �;���,'�„� 'aY�3�3�"`��� ��� K�' .�
2� '���Prese�ofs�reatt��nyertebra�es(see nage4�. r �>�� �, �-� � � ���
Y � f ,
3 r,� ? a3--3= ;:. =w�v,�:\�3� � -c._.�R .�h,�r� a', '�i'� \�q�� � �� O �� �
���� �no,�videhs;e ,(},.co�nmon�iiumerousty es_=ma7c o�n�s)�"�; �,�„��.:��: ;�.�����y ..����� ,
,�'�. e � �. in�ti ��z � � � '� -`:.z�r ���,� , ����\�.�:^� ��`�:�� �`��y : . Z..
�2� ����,������ Preseuce of am�l�ib�ans . �: ... 5 � Q 4,. ���0��'�4����-
�. _.� ..; _.. _ .. �.� � ',�,�.__F�L`z� �. -��� �' .�� .
�.„��, .. nQ;�x1E�BnC� U,Co!]]mPn;�tlmero�l�. es_-max Q.ttlt� _ ._.. ����_-.......-� w�,.3 `�, `�
�, _,�--v"�4�:�
� ���t.�',:�` ' .��.��tic-t-��"`��Presence of fish S,� ,`' 4 '' �'�.��� ,�y.����"�����-�`�-.� �� f ;;�"'.
a2���`e��.�::z'� �i� -c S; Z �:_ �,;,:� z - .�z' ..�.� ��.4�� -�'�'0 � Q '�,_. �.
._ , . _ ..-. .. e �4'Y� �"�s�,-.��.�� .
���.'�;�,� I10;�►�EE�BI1C.e..,�S.COIlS�iO �:numerous. es.-.ma�e D�111�5 .._;;.s���--a-.x�..�����.^F ,,., � �;;
�2��X �,�������vidence`of rnidl�fe use� � �� ��, ��. � ���"�� � �-� � R �
..���� , :. � ,. . .... °�, fl 5�� 0�� :, � �
a��.. ;.�� no_e�rdence..._Q,ahundaiitevidence, max ovi#s �� � �`;����,� -.`� . _��-
,
-� � ). _��:..... �;.�� ���������
a
o � 5. �> .� �
��Th`ese characteristic`s ar�not assessad in coasfal sti ;, , . , ,... .
G�J � , �- � :�_ >,,..� . . . .�
_ I� �. ���. ..,iy�� r, ir . . .. .. . . wmS. E .F .. . . 1. , i.� � ' t'�'�' . . _ {�_-Jt: .,i��l. .�. .a �
. . '. �. � . .. _ , . . ' . . . . _. � ' . . -' . . t � �..
� . a
�t ` �l �.) �y .
.�_� .�{�:.
� .

North Carolina Division of Water Qual'[ty-Stream Ident'fiication Eorm; Version 3.9 ���_p
Date: 31612�09 Project: I,NG-Walnuf Creek l.akitude: 35.74860N
Eva[uafvr: �SI,T. Milam Site: ���� Longitude: 78.543'[9W
Total points: Counf Wake Ofher:
Streams are at Isast Intermiftent ff �' Y�
>�i8 or rennlal if�=30.
A.Gearnor hology subtofal= 9 �lbsent % : _ Weak ,,, ,,E1loderate „.$ir:�ng _"
7'°.�ontinuous bed and aank � Q � � �`� � 3
2. Sinuosify � Q � '� �2 �3
3. In-channel structure: ri#fle pno[sequence �� � '� �2 t�3
4. 5oi(fexture ar stream substrate sorling �Q � � �2 �3
5.Activelrelic floodplain �Q � � �2 �}3
6. Qeposifiona[bars or benches �fl � � �� �`3
7. Braided cnannel �� � � �2 ��
8. Recent aE[uvial deposits �� � � �� �3
9*. �Iafural le�ees �a � "1 �2 �3
10. Headcuts � � � "1 C7'2 C 3
11.Grade controfs �� ��•� � � � ���
12. Natural va[ley and drainageway '�fl ��•� � � � ���
13, Secgnd or greater order c�ar�ne!on exiSflElq USGS or NRCS
map or other documented evidence. � �a= 0 �Ye5 = 3
*Man-rt3ade ditcnes are not rated;see discusstons In manuaf
B. Hydro[ogy subtatal= 7.5
14. Groundwater fiowld�scharge �}0 �} 1 t]�2 Q 3
5.Wafer in channe[an �48 rs since rain,ar afer in channe
-dry or growing season {�0 C� 1 �2 � 3
16. l.eaflitter � 1.5 �} '[ � 0.5 t� 0
'f7. Sedirnenf or�pfanfs �a '�' a.5 � 1 � '[.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles(wrack I[nes) � � � �•� � 1 � '[.5
19. Hydric soils(redoxomorphic features} prasent? � No= 0 �?Ye5 � 1.5
C. B[ology subtotal= �4.5
20*. F'ibrous roois in channel �7'3 �2 � 1 [}a
29*. Rooted plants€rt channe! � 3 �2 �3 1 �}0
22, Cra�sh �0 t�0.5 � 1 C� 1.6
23. 8[�aE�es �0 � 1 �2 � 3
24. Fish �0 �} 0.6 � 1 � 1.5
25.Amphib9ans �4 �?0.5 � '[ t]� 1.fi 3
26. Macrobe�thos (note diversity and abundance) �� � �•� � � � �°'
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton �'� �' "1 '�2 � 3
28. Iran oxidizing bacterialfungus �Q � Q•� � � � �•5
29*.Weiland p[ants in streambed �}FAC � FACW �OBL �}SAV �other
•ttems 26-21{oc�rs on tha prasence oF ugland plants,flem 29 focuses on ihe praserxe of aquatic o�wetland plants
�IOtES:
�

USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate on attached map)
;,�,; STREAM QUALITY ASSES5MENT WORKSHEET r��- SSPK
Provide tt�e folIowing infoi•mation for the sfream reach vnder assessment: ��P�
I.Applicant's name;��t�-i � ���� 2.�valuakor's name:___�s����v� ��rri b ti!!�
3.Date of evaluation: 3�f!��,�,-�� 4.Ti�ne of evaivation: �If'� �
5.Name of stxeam: ��� ��fn�� �r� b.River basin: s,�,�r�
7.Approximate cirainage area: 8.Stream order; ,�f�
9.Length ofreach evaluated: � s� �• IU.County: �`��
iI, Site coordinates(if kt�otivn): prafer in decima[degrees. 12.Subdivision name(if any):
Latitude(ex.34.872312): 35.�]�Z�� ___ Longitude(ex.-77.SSG6I1}: "`�C�.������
Method location dekermined(circte): � Topo Sheef Ortho(Aerial)�hoto/GIS Other GIS Other
' 13.Location of reach under evaluat�an(note nearby roads and landt�arks and attach map identifying stream(s)lacation):
Q) rrl i�t t l�-�1 � 1Vd�� C.filc.,� �t-��C
14.Proposed channel work(if any): ��n rwH
15.Recent weather conditions: IGch.r.c, , t,s�r�
16. Site conditions at time of visik k h�
17.Identify any special waterway eIassifications known: _Section 10 ^,Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habikak
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters �Nutrient 8ensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-I�
18,Ts there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poink7 YES � If yes,estimate the water surface area:
19.Does channel appear on USGS quad map? Y�S � 20.Does channel appear on USDA 5oi1 Survey7 � NO
21.Estimated watershed land use: �%Residential _%Commercial _%Industrial ______°/u Agricultural
�%�'orested ,�,°/u Cteared/Logged _%OFher( _)
22,Bankfull width: � � �_ 23.Bank height(from bed to tvp of bank}: � � �,
24.Channel slope dvwn center of strearn: _Flat(4 to 2%) � Gentle(2 ta 4%) ,_,Mpderate(4 to 10%) _Stee�(>1�%)
25.Channei sinuosity: Straight _Occasianal bends k'�requent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instrucfions for completion of ivorksheet {lacafed on page 2): Begin by determining #he �nask appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain,vegetation, stream eIassification, etc. Every characteristic rnust be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign points
ta each characteristic within the range shawn for the ecoregion, Page 3 pronides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identi#"ied in the warksheet, Scares should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reaeh under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due tv sike or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and pravide an explanation in the
con�nent section. Where there are obvious changes in tha eharacter of a stream under re�iew(e.g.,the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest),the strearn may ba divided into smaller reaches that display mare continuity,and a separate form used#o evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a strea�n reaen must range beriveen � and 100, witlz a scare af 10Q representing a stream of the
highest quality. �
Total Score {froru reverse}; �Q Camments: ;
i
I
�
Evaivator's 5ignature ��� Date �/�����'� .
- This channel e�a�aation form is intended to be used oniy as a guide ta ass'rst landowners and en�ironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United �tates Army Corps of Engineers to ma�e a pre�iminary assessment of stream
qualify. Tl�e total score resulting from the completion of t�►is form is subject to USACE approval and does nat imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subjeet to change-version 061b3. To Comment,please ca�1919-876-8441 x 26.
r
1 ��� �r' �

STREAM QUALITY A55ESSMENT WORKSHEET
� -/�"�fT�`"'���'�� .-d � ✓" �,r��E � � �' ,z�� .�'��� .�,�I,.'.i4��i������.1���+��1si��a '"��� �,"�a '.
�i 5^��.,, ..�a'�,�-�r�����,L����������'�-- w���'�.:i��� ,._„-,� ,.. 7 ,� -a: r. � �. „�.; � r- � �.v=�� �1:�� �.
� ��.:..1�nr� ^�-r-,,;..;-s-^�'..7^'�"��"�/ � �. _ �n .a-.x � �� 1 � ���, ".+,�"c.�-'_r:�^�,,, zz.�,'
� � ��-��;k,��;����'r�--�l . . .,;�,--'° ,��d.-�� � �i�;� ''� ,:,. *�iE[�121�I1� Mo�nfa�n,; � a�� _
;.�,m.,. °��. ,��__�.��n��,,..�,,.. .�t �-� _ �....: �..,,�
_. .���.. . ,_�_ � � -�"
� Preseuce offlaw/pers�s#ent pools�n"stream ; ��mm�_�^�
1 � �o fiow:ar s ' �� fl=5 � _' ��-� Q��=� -
aturat�on. . �,s�'ong�3o�v :max polnts ,
Eyidenee ofpast�uman alteratto.n �
2 ': . ,. .. U—b €3-� 4-5
._; ? .. (axtens�ve�Itera��on .0,no alterat�on max�ou�fs) .. . ' „ > ; : ; :
Riparia�i�one
� � nobuffer—�� � �`�� � ' �� �-G 0-� 0=�
; ( �-Q cont�gua�zs,wtde buffer ntax pouits) ,
�� �� �, � �
,. �_
,
� Ende�►c�of nut�ient or_chemical�iischarges " � �
r � ;: , ; . . . �: 5 (}=� �.=4
,' _ . extensi�e d.ischarge...s. ..0,na d�seharges=„m,,,ax oin� . ' ' ;
�`� � � � ; Grou�d�vater�l�sch�rge � , ' �
S : . „ �:-3 ; �,-,} 4'�4
� (no discharge .0 spnngs,seeps,t�vetlands ete.����� max pai�ts� :, �
� Presence nf ad,�acerit flna�p�ain;
� 6 ; ; ' U-� ' (1=4 0'�2 �
[�a flood lav� 0,exte�isive flaod Ia�n �nax�otnts)
� Enfret�chtnentlfloodpIain aecess
�-� '] : � n ,� _ ��� 4'�4 fl'-� �
' {deeply entrenehed-.;4,fre,q.u.ent floadmg=max po3nts)
Presence.;�Qfadjacei�t�et�ands�����; � � �
�8 ; � {?'-�6 0�-� 4�=2
;
.. � .
; (no wetlands..:=O,lar `e adTac.,ent`xetlands xt�ax olnts) '
�� i ��" �Channe�sinupsity �
F � ; _, > ' ��5 s U=4 ` (1'--3
extens�ve e�iannel�zation, ,t�•natt�al meander-xnax potnts i �
�ed��ne�zt an�ut ; l
� Ifl . � �-5 Q-4 (},.�4 l
��xtensive de o�it�an°� liftle.ar.�Q sed�nen�=m�p;o�nts �
� `Size&fliversif�o�cha�nel bed subsfra#e ; '�-�� � ' �
� . II ��� � � � , � ; � �f� 4�=4 � f}-5
,,.. fin.e,hot�o enous°.� 1ar e drverse;s��es, znax pints
t ,
�: �Ev�deuce of eha��tel��o�s«sn��r widenyng �
12 dee 1 u�eised°D•stable.bec�&banks . zrkax.paints �.-5 0'-4 fl'-�5 ��
� � ' � .Presenc��f�a,�or�ank�'aztures ��� � ��'
�� � �3 ' � � �` t#-=5 �=5 I};-.� .° � �
severe erosion; fl�no erosion stable banks max ouits ;
�-�€. „ , .
Roof depth aud density an banks �
� I4. 9 '-3 ��-4 R.=S
�: no vis,ible roots=4•dense roots throughaut :max Qints
� Impact;by ag"riculti�€re, lzvestock,or;tun�er;production �
�5 ; ,. . A� , : 0 �=� i ��-4 ; 0-�.
<��n . ' subsfantial iui act D;,no'e"v,�denae. tnax po�nts. ; ::;. '
� Presence o�rifflg pooilripple pnol eumplexes' �
� �� �=� ,. . . � � �: � i � � tf�=3 �� 0��---� '�=6�
� no rifflesfr� les ar ooIs 0,well cIeveioped=�nax. o�nts
-%~� ; Hab�tat camp�eaci.fy
1� . �' �-6 0=6 ��-6 �:
� ; {ltt�e or rio habztaf 0,fr�qu�ut,�ar�ed�ahitats.! max o�nts) ; ' ` ; �
� . . < <
�anopy coverage o'ver streambed �
Ig : ' 4 5 0-5 0.—S
�o s�adir�g vegeta�ton U,conttnuous cana y=max o�nts
I9 ;S�bstrafe embeddeclness ��="-`�A�: '�' p-4 `(}—4
-. (deepl�_embe�ided 0,loose strizcture .;1nax :: ; ��y;�...._. ,.�:
� 3
Presence`of stre�m Znverte�rates(see page 4)- �
2�� �(no evtdence ;,'�;O,.comunon,n � � �-4 �� .. {1-S ., ��� �-5 „,
umerous. es max pou�ts)
� � E Pres�nce of�tnphib�ans � � �
2��� � �: �� �'�� �� �� ���-4 0-� 0-A� � �
fl (no evitlenee 'D,eorn�on,��.�tuerous types max pou�ts), ;
P�resence:offish .
�O 22 i `: ` , ' (}-4 0-�4 �?4
, (n:o ev�dence �0,eonunon,numerous:lypes=max ou�ts d
�� _ ' Ev�dence of�vildlif`e use
2�� �, ; � � , 0:`�-6 � 0'-5 � 0��
� ..-.' no:evidenc..e . O,:a..bundant:evidence=max ouits ,. �' ' �
' ��r�^'J`�-.d �y� ��y ... *. . ":� � f '� .
� � ��'"����% Ta�alpain�s�ossible : ' � "� '� ���":��1{f� it3� i�� � �.
�...,. ._�_.,,;�, .�.� �,�.-�_����.,�-_m,,.� ��',. �m'�: .. . � �.„r�.�����: �`�- .�`
� �
: , � � , .-��'✓�r'.�r�r' .,�' � :�" �-. ��. '=� �:�-,rn✓�„ ��;, , .� ��".".�
�..-,. ,,.,,r -�.�,.� a
� �����"-����� ��'I'�'�`AL���`OR� �a�SfJ�ri�e��Qil fu'st pag�� � � � .��
- '" �'�" ,,, �;� �.,� � R,�, ,:�.� �� �;�`,� £
.._... .�.... ..� �._-....... .. .. �;;� ..,,._ .
w..�� _.�_ �a _�.�,_.._��..,.... ., .
. ..... ... . ... . .�_�-
,��� �
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
,
' --� .=> !�..�• :�
{�'' �� c�,.7 $�,_, 2
;

USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate an attached map)
5 SPG
;,�,; �TREAM QUALITY A5SESSMENT WORKSHEET .�,.�-
Provide the foliowing infnrmation for#he stream reach under assessment:
1.Applicant's name: `� �." � 2.Evaluator's name: �s� LcrL i rNd�.!�
3,Dake of evaluation: �i�./�'�� 4.Time of evaluation: �l�'1
5.Name of stream: G[ ,T � �a_T�;,�.y (,rE�'c 6,River basin: /Uew t�
7.Approximate drairtage area: 8. Strea�n order: .� ��'
9,i,ength of reaeh evaluated: j 4Q �''j" 10.Caunty: We��
11. Site coordinates(if knotvn): prefer in decimal degrecs. 12.Subdivision name(if any):
Lafifude(ex.34.872312): 3 S�.��Z,T� l.angit[�de(ex.-77.SSfib 11�: -7�S��f�`�'�
Method location detarmined(circle): GP Topn Sheet Or#ho(Aerial)Photo/GI5 Other GIS Other
13.I.ocation of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and lac�dniarks and attach map idenfifying stream(s)location}:
L a s�c✓�, �1 n�'a.t 2 Fds„�t ' Ne,/f'�� 'U�1.,k F- ��¢1e
1�.Proposed channel�vork(if any): ��.k
15,Recent weather conditions: sk,�n �v r�
16. Site conditions at time of visit; s ti��a
17.Iden�ify any speciai waterway classifications known: _5ection 10 _Tidal Waters ,_,_,Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters k' Nutrient Sensiti�e Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18.Is there a pond or lake locaked upstream of the evaluation point? YES �If yes,estirnate the water surfaee area:
19.Does c�annel appear on USGS quad n�ap? YES � 20.Does channel appear on U�DA Soil Su�vey7 � NO
21.Estimated watershed Iand use: ��%Residenfial _%Comntercial %Inciustrial _%Agriculkural
�%Foresked _%Cleared/Logged _%Other( )
22.Bankfuli width:_ �� 23.Bank height(from bed to top of bank): � {�� ��
24. Channel sIope down center of stream: _Flat(4 ta 2%) �Gentie(2 to 9�%) _Moderate(4 to 10%) ,_,Steep(>10%) '
25.Channel sir�uosiry: Straight �,Occasional bends �e' �'requenk meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (Ioeate� on page 2): Begin by determining the n�ast apprflpriate ecoregion based on
locakion, terrain,vegetativn, skreatn classification, ete. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecaregion. Assigri points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 pro�ides a brzef description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet, Scores sl�ould reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation, If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter a in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where#here are abvious changes in�ie character of a stream ut�der review(e,g,,the stream flows fram a pasture
into a forest),the stream may be divided into smaller reac�es thak display more continuity, and a saparate fqrm used to avaluate eaeh
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between � and 100, wi��.a score of 10� representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Commants:
1
;
�valuatar's Signature ��� Date�„�/����T�
This channel evaIuatian form is intended En be used only as a gnide to assist landowners and environmen#al professionais in
gathering the data required by tl�e United States Army Carps tif Engineet•s to maks a preliminary assessnnent of s#ream
quality. The fota[ score resuifing from fhe completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratla or requiremenE. Farni subject to change-version 06103. To Comment,please ca11919-$76-8441 x 2b.
1 5��

STREAM QUALITY A55ESSMENT WORKSHEET
���;�����'"�,,� � x .�� ��. �-� � ,���� ���D�I P��3I�tT T�.��`�G������'�'� ,�
� � �� �C�12.�a�T��STi�� ��-������,��� �,..�, � � �.::�,�� �-�,�.. ; .��, $ S�GQ
°� , '�,a G',, �z '����"� ..� � � .4 °��z��-� � ��.'U7����"<r�,'"����µI�IQXi� �OTIII�lIl�rc ��`� -�,�'„'
r
< �� q � �' ''��
.s.�-.. � - �,.a."��.M..._ '��-�.r."w�"�-.��� °'s �m'�,a_ m.;�"-..�,���v. ��-/*^..,,a.rr
. ,_ �' ., �. �` . • _
�-� � Prese�ce afflo�y 1 persts#enf po�ls�n s'tream � �
1 ���, <. � � � 4.�-�5 : (1=4 fl�—5
� _ , {�o.flow or�sa�tratrpn .�,strong�Iow :�n�x vitits
< .
,. , ..���:
�pasthuman al�c�at�ak� ;
� , (extensiEe a�lt raf�on ' ` .. ; 4'—6 �-S . �=5
tl,no alteration. max point',s} -, �
� . �no 3�uffer ;f3,conti�� ��r�an z�tne '; ''; ��; 'p �-6 �, : (?'-� i1—5
R� : `
' `
g�zous,�ride b�ffer m'ax poir�fs) ,
� ' Evrdence of nutr�en�or chemical d�scharges ' �`
,- � ` � , .. (1-5 0—4 t}'-�
.��- ��� ea�e�isfve�seharges (1,nci diselia�ges—max�oiuts �:
T
�� " Gronnd�'ater d�scharge
.� 5 ��� � � �< �� �� � � ��� 4=3 tl�-4 0��--�4 3
� (no discharge Q,springs,se�ps,we#Iands,ete: max oin�s)
� � ;, nofiood la��sence.ofa�j�cent�flnodplain' `
,� 6 � � � � . � � ��. Q—� 0'-4 0;2
� .
( p tn 0,extenstve floodpla�n max pa�bts)
Entrencbment(#1€�odplain access
. �a 3 . , , . :: .' U-5 �-� 0'-2
,
� ..- . '�, (deeply entreiiched.:�{},fre.quent���lood�ng=.max po�nts} . ��, , ��::
PreSence:;of adsacent�e#lands:
s ������ (na.sv'� , � �,: �`=� " 0=9 U����2
�tiands=tl,lar e ad`acent ti�ettancts=max. o�r�ts ; > �' ,
�hanuel sinuos�Ey ,3 '
9 � � _. _; �=� 0���=4 0��-3
;
(ex�ensive channel�zation 41� .n.a�.urat meander=max. .�►�nts) '
�,t} ', Sec�iinent��pu� ' Q-5 0-� 0-4 Z
� ��extensive,cleposi�ivn°U lit�le or�a�seii�ent.`=inax o�nts) ::
� � ����ze&���i�ersity af chanAei�ed s�bsfrafe ; � � �
�� �� ���4mn enaus . (�'lar e di�erse:sizes, - �� ' ` �A 0�-� ! �'-S ��
ft� _ ��inax a�ts}..
Evidence of cbannel inc�s�ori ar w�denu�g ; .3
�� . �� � � � 0'-�. ��-4 (3�-S
� dee�il �nc�sed D•�sfable bec�8�bat�cs max po�uts� �
� Presence of�ajor bank failures , _ � �
�1� � ��5 0��;-5 0�-5 ,
severe erosion.-U�no'�rosio�i;statile'banks ;max po�nts !
�'�' ,
� Rauf depti�and.density�II banks �� �
�� 14. ' : .��� � � �?=3� � fJ : 4 � 2_
�y no.visr6la roats=Q•dense roots throughout :�uax�o�ts
� :, ���
� 3rr�pact:by ag�ic�lture, 1�vestock,or timber prnduction
�5 �. � ���5 4��4 � p>-5 ,
�. ;.,. . ` subs�a.ntial uri act=�•no evidence xnaxpo�ts �
P_resence:ufri�e paollr��pie paql complexes' . Z
� �b no ri�eshi les or oo�s . Q.�?vell=developed.=max "aints ' �-� ' 0-� ' 0��6
�'' ' , �iab�ta�comPie�fy ' 3
17 � ' (� ��-6 0�6 0=6
�r IittXe flr,no l�abi�at �,`frequent;varted i�a��tats: max� o�nts '.
� �` ���snopy�overage over streambed � �
�8 , 0 S 0--�5 0-5 .
no shading Yegetat�an "U,coi��nupus car�o =max ointsj , ,
� �ubstra#e Qmbet3dedness ' �'�'"�°�- �� .�
,� I9 : � � '� �,���-���� p�4 �Q=4 .
,_ � .�,� ,
_. ,- > , , - [dee�ly:embedded. 0,loose structure :max :: �,��"����. „
� Presence;of stream►nver�ebrafes(see page 4)',
2(i ��� , , _� (} '--4 ��, t�-5 � D-5
(no evtde�ce :0,cammon,numerous.. es maxpo.�.ttts) ..
� - �, .
� ; ; Presence of amphxb�ans , �
2.I , � �-�4 Q-4 � �1;,4
G �no ev�dence !0,cominon,numerous.types •max po�nts}. .
Presence;offish< �
C�3 2� ` , � �,' 4 ��-4 . D.=4 0�-4 �
� :_no ev�dence '0,comu�on,numerous.types �uax points) ,
,� ` Ev�d,e�ee of�v�ldlife use ;
23 0-6 0=5 €1-5 � 1
,,, . .. no;ev�denc.::e �,abundarit evidence . max,poirits) .. . : `
-�..".;`: ��-�-��.,�.,�"'".r"�'„�.�."'�'l ..�'a"-� '� �-"� �^":. �: �,�'?''"'"�a" rJ"�'�r^-�.'�;�� � ✓� �� : ,,;: ,
' ,� � r�+�ta1�,'n�n�s Pnss�ble %� ' ��..,�� �(1� � � 1fl0 �40 �
.;. � � �,y��.�_��,.� �- a
�,. ``` �"°'�;` i ..�,.�_;� m���.,� ,,�..
.�.�t 'ma^�' S"�"�.5�.,^a-,M-r�����"'"�''��� 5 "�%-., �., � -.�r .r C..-��s'�� f,.�:z... ;' , y" ,i,r �,,,..a� :
� � ��� �,�,� ��y���.�-=���,.��`�TAL�Ct)R.� �(a��o en�er�n f�rs�pag�z��-� � �6
- �'�� " ��--���'� .R ...;.�:..F.,_�. �� � �. ��: {.
. .._�,. ,.. , �,��,m:-��,�,�.. .mu,.. �
'I'hese characteristics are not assessed in cvastai str � `�Y�m������ �"" ° � ° ---._ ..._ .�
� _,eau�s.
� .�_...'--'.3 '+y
_ '1� � i� �
�
V

USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate on attached map)
�S PC
„e,� STREAM QUALITY A�SE5SMENT WORKSHEET ._F�� .:.
Provide t�e following informatian fbr the stream reach under assessment;
1.AppIicant's name:,T ��� aF �c,J�� 2.Evaluatar's name; �5� Iea�N �PH b��t�
3.Date of evaIuation: 3 la �°�`� 4.Ti�ne of evaluation: P�
5.Name of sbream: �.4 r 4� w�(hw�` G�ek 6.River basin:, �e,,,se
'7,Approximate drainage area: $.Stream order: �2"�
9.Lengkh ofreach evaluated: �Qa �" 10.County: ��..k L _
11. Site coordinakes(if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12.Subdivision name(if any);
LaYituda(ex.34.8723 i2): ��•�Sd�� I.ongifude(ex.=77.556b1I):� w��.�,S�i�CS
Method location detercnined(circle): cVs��a� Topo Shee# Ortho(Aerial)Plioto/GTS Other GIS Other
13,Location nf reach under evaluation(note nearby rpads and landmarks and attach map iden#ifying stream(s)location):
�'c�,� Oe��-�ekr �{ ; Nory, o--� �.1��.lhw�- Cr-c.�k
14.Proposed cl�annel work{if any): `��..�-wK
15.Recent weather conditions: ��n �r
16. Sike conditions at tFme of visit: f�k�
17,Identify any speciat waterway classifications known: ^Section 14 _Tidal Waters ,�Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Dutstanding Resource Waters �'Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV}
18,Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evatuation point? YES �If yes,estunate�ha water surface area:
19.Does channel appear on USGS quad map7 YES IQ 20.Does channel appear on USDA Soil�urvey? YES�
21.Estimated watershed Iand use: �%Residential %Commercial �%Industrial _%Agriculkural
3�7%Forested _%Cleared/Logged _°1a Other( )
22.Bankfull width: L � �' 23.Bank lieight(from bed to top of bank): '�'�" _
24.Channel slope down center of stream: Flat(0#0 2%) �Gentle(2 to Q�%) _Moderate(4�o l�%) ,_,_Steep{>I O%)
25.Channel sinuosiry: Straight _Occasional bends �'OFrequent meander Vary sir�uous Braided channel
Instructions for completio�a af�vorl�sheet (located on page 2): Begin by determ�ing the most appropriate ecoregivn based on
location, terrain,vegetation, stream classificakion, etc, Every characteris#ic must be scored using f.he satne ecaregion. Assign poinks
to each characteristic within the range shown for tha ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identi�ed in tlie worksheet. Scores should re#�ect an averall assessment of the stream reach under evaIuation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluaYed due to site ar weatl�er conditions, enter (1 in the scoring box and provide an explanafion in the .
con��nent section. W�iere fl�ere are ob�ious changes in the eharacter of a stream under review(e,g,,the stream flows from a pas[ure
into a farest),the stream may be divided into smalier reaehes that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The tatal score assigned to a stream reaeh xuust range bet�veen � and 100, witi�a score of 14� represenfing a stream of t�e
h�ghest quality.
Tatal Score (fram re'verse}: � Comraents: �
i
EvaIuator's Signature��� Date 3f �����`�
�......��
- This channel evaluation form is intended to be usec� only as a guidc to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliu�inary assess�►nent af stream
quality. The total score resulting from t�e completion of this farm is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation rafio or requirement. Form subject to change—version Ob/Q3. To Co�runent,please call 919-$76-8G41 x 26.
1 S��

STREAM QUALYTY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
�,��..� � �
� ���. �� �.� :�� ��.-�,� �G��l����l�T�'+QII�IT RAI�i�� � -� �
��;� � -�'�� � � , C�ARA�C�T��[T�T��� ��' �� ��x�= �a -�1 -;�, � �� �3-- y�;�� ���''Q��
:,�..��^�.�"��?�,?�.. ,a .�^��- `,r�'�z�,�G�,,,,�,'-_;�-'�,�;,...��'.- �,�-, -. z� � r�",.",��� ���`,,���iB�1I1471� , ST,�OLlII�dIll ��ii�n,:.
..,�-._��__ � _,_- ,....��.,,_� . .� � ,,., :�.M- �.�,._ ��� .
�� Presence;of fIa`v I pers'€sfent pnoIs in s�ream-": -
��, � , , . q-� �=4 0'=5
�� ..,: no,fIojv�or satut'atian ,0,strong�Iow, max po�n�s . ; ; '
�� � �
:
,-� . �v�c�ence o�past hic�nan alter�tion �
� � ,. . ; 0-6 (�=5 p.'--�
} ; (extensive a.iter�t�ori... Q,no alteration. max oln�s ; :
. :
Rtparian�i�ne : �
3 ��; � � �_ '��� Q�� ��-�# (1��-5
; (no buffer=.�,eontiguous,ivida b�ffer.,.�iax pouitsj ; ; '
� � Evtdenc�of nutrien�or-clzemica�d�scl�arges�'� �
�� .
� (extens�ve dischar es �;�no d1"seha�ges . �nax.�o�uts} ����� ' ��4 � ���� ' �
�r�undwater d�sch�rge 3
� . : ;' D�-3 0�--4 �=4 ,
� (no diseYtar e=0,spr�ngs see�s,u�e�iarids,etc� �zax pa�is �
� Presence of ad,�acent flooclpla�n:
� � � � '� < < � � � � 0=� 0-4 d=�
na.�i ood Iain ..0,eXtens�ve floadpla�n �tiax.po�nts) ; . _, . . �
- Eafrenchui�n�!floodpla�n access
� � �(�{eeply en#�enched "_U,�requent.floocl�ng �-�'� 0�4 (1-2 �
; � ma�c o�ts)
� P�ese�ce:c�f ad��centwetlan�ls '
8 ! ; ' U'-� 0-4 . 0=2
no v►�etlands=0;Iarge ad�acent�etTands �ax ornts� �
' " Charnnel sinuasity ;
9 ,: „ �-5 0�� .. �-3
.�..... �xtensive cha�irieltzatton. � n�Eurat x�ieander.'-max t?oints �, , . ���, :��� �
�edime�t�nput ' t
lU ,. ` ; = r t1.-5 i 0-A = 0-�
. {extens�ue de ostt�on .0,Itl�I�or�o setlimen�--max pomts f
�S�e&d;vers►[y of channel bed substrate : �k
1.1 ; : �T�, Q-4 0-�
� �� �'u�e;�io��oge�ous ..�,Iar e :idiv�rse�s�zes �.�max olnts . : _�:�. . ,. ..�� ��� -. . �: � I
Evidence of ch'annel�ncis[on or w�den�ng , � L �
12 � ,� � 0 �-5 : 0-4 �-5 —T
� dee ly uxcised t1,stable hed&banks iriax otrits)
,,,�,� ; ; Preseuce of ma,�or bank fa�lures: ' �
� 1�� �� � ���-.5��. � � a=3 0=5 ��
� (severe:eroszon:; Q,na eros�a ' stable banks -"max a�nts)
� ; Ro6t depth and density ou ba�ks ' �
�
��� °no��st61e iroots. (1 dens,e roots thrnughout..:.:;max. .o�nts) .:,� � ���� � �-� � ��� ���_� ��
� Impact`:;by�gr�cui�ure, Irvestock,oX t�mbei;product�on 3
l� �� ��� ; . � '=5 0�-4 0-5
, {suhstantial un ac� 0 no e��dence rna..x pouits)
Presence of r�ffle pooll�r�pple pooI complezes �
'' l� nv�iffles/ri les.�r, npls„ 0,�vell develo ed°max,�io�its , = �-3 0-5 ; (1-6
.�d's ; Halic�a�camplez�t� = ' �
l� Q-6 Q-6 �-6
� little or r�o habttat (1,�rec�uent;�ar�ed hab�tats max a�n#s -
o s�iadin vegetat�on :;Q eorit�nuou��canop��
1 S Canopy eoverage��er s#r�amhed a 5 (�-5 �l-5 5
"� tt =ntax outts ,
19 ' ,:�ubstrate emUedded�ess , ��'��r,�,.,W�
� ciee��Y einbedded O,l.oase"structure=max ` ~�,.��"� ' fl '-4 ; ��4 �.
, ; : , ;
�..�_�._�� -� '
h PYesence:of streaiu in�eXtebra#es(see page 4} ; `
24 ;� ; � ,.. � � �� Q �-4 ; 0 '-5 0�=5
� ;.(no ev�dence (1,cornmon;numerous tYpes='ruax�a�nfsj :;; �
� �� � � Prese�ce of am 3�ibians � �� �� � � � I
P .� —4 0--4 �
� 2i ' , ` (� �r� �}��. i
C� (r�a evidence ;t3,eammon,nu,m,erous 7.ypes=max po�ts)
� Presence af�sh �
�� 22 � � �`` � �� � � � � ��-4 0��4 0�=4 f
,(no av�dence ,�,comman;nuimerous�types=�t�tax�ou�ts). :
� : � Evidenee nf�y�dlife�use �-� � �
23 �� �� ; � _ � ,. . , p ��6 � p:_5 �Q'�-5 �
��� � � . {no,ey�dene�—(};abundant ev�dei��e �n�i�o���) � -.,:. ; ��; �� .. �.. �� �
s r' �- - .: �, - � ::. y✓"� �� �, � ,%„' ,� a* . �.,. .
^�"''�"„"?"�. ,�ni-`�`� � a,^,z -� ,r�" ,-.�'.,�,r�...,�„/ � � r� �/�� 'r">' � n� (� �y r�'�l✓". " r
�..„.,, r,i" �'- �` �.Tota].�o�nts Passiblc. �, ��il���_�: lUU �U� �' :
�.�.-»-- :.� � +..
�`. � _,-,:s'__>u ��� _ �� �� y*e , .._s�m i,
� ,f.✓� ""�'^p-„� � _ '�r"'^;�,a ��., r�"�.r°°'c-�(r�". � -'. � #�- -��.,�"� �,. � ��., °'".".°
l�/�''�����#""��.,, � �,^���,"�"�'�"`�rM��1��7L�� ��.�.��s�L�r�{��������l�ber� ��a✓�"''�' ,,„,� "� a rf-
n.,�.............-...,.� y-..,-..;: :....;. ,,� .,.,....,.,.,.,.,. ,� ,--•--...u�'.:..r_-� __�,� _�.�.. _,�,_ ..
W�v ,,.. -'i,..._, . 1- _,..,_..._dS,. ___.�_.. ..i„3............... .. ...�.... ,w.,.. . . .9 J � .::
' '�'These characteristics are not assessed in coastal s�reams.
t�'� #'�-�' �

USAGE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate on attached map}
�,�„ �TREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET fy� SS��
,--:_
Provide ihe following information for fhe stream reach under assessment:
1,Applicant's na�ne; �.i� UF /�.��.�iL► 2.Bvaluakor's name: 5:I' f�6.�f- 1�.�.,6c.1!
3.Date of evaluation:���'°� 4.Time df evaluation;, �1
5.Name af siream: fit"� Inlr��u f��-z-l� 6.Ri�er basin: N�-�--�'e
7.Approximate drainage area: S.Stream order: � �f
9.Length of reach evaivated: �OD � 10,County: ��t�
Il, Site coordinates(if known): prefer in decima!degrees. 12.Subdivision name(if any):
Latitude(ex.34.872312}: �S•��Sa�� Longitude(ex.--77.556611): —7S. ��SZ�
Method location determined(circle): GP Topo Shee# �riho(Aeria])Photo/GIS Other GI5 Ottier
13.Location of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s)location):
��wz�.. Dc-�ac��e./�t a..�.t( �„�.>..[h c� �'�{-y,� �d • N�Ft, �, �„�0.1�.�,.,y Crcc,k- _
14.Proposed channel work{if any): 1.��k ��,.�h
I5.Recent weather conditions: sk..r,K u �l/GCrv�
16. Site condikions at time of visit: s k K��,
I7.Identify any special�vatenvay classifications kctown: _5ection 1� _Tidal Waters �,Essentixl Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters .,,�Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water�upply Watershed (I-IV)
18,Is there a pond or lake lpeated upstream of Tl�e evaluatian point7 YBS T(� If yes,estzmate the water stirface area;
19.Does channel appear on U5G5 quad map? YES � 2U.Does channel appear on USDA Soil Suivey?� NO
21.Estimated watershed land use: ��%Residential ..�,°/a Comrnercial _%Industrial _°fo Agricuitural
'1�0%Forested %Cleared/Logged �%OF1�er( )
22.Bankful�width: � �}` 23,Bank height{from bed ta top of bank): 2�� I
24,Channel s�ope dawn center of stream: ^Flxt(Q#0 2%) � Genfle(2 to 4%) _Moderate(4�0 1Q%) ,�Steep(>10%)
25.Channel sir�uosity: Sfraight _Occasional bends �flFrequent meander �Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (Iocatec� on page 2); Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
Iocation, terrain,vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteriskic must be scpred using the same ecaregion. Assigrt points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of ho�v to review the
chatacteristics identi€ied in the worksheet. Seores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation, If a
characteristic cannot t�e evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 i� the scoring box and pro�ide an expla�akion is� the
comment section. Where there are obvious chartges in the character af a stream under review (e.g.,the streatn flows from a pasture
into a forest), flie stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display niore continuiry, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reacl�. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range beri�een 0 and I00, with a. score. of I�D represenEing a stream of the
highest qualiry.
Total Score (fram reverse): �0 Cornments:
Evaluator's Signature G���'`l" 1� ' Date �/ P��� `j -
- This c�►annel evaluation form is intended to ba used only as a guide fo assist lan€dv�vners anc� environmental professionals in
gathering the data req�ired by tl�e Ua�i�ed States Army Cflrps of Engineers ta make a preliminaty assessxneut of stream
quality. The total scorc resulting from the campletian of tl�is form is subject to U�ACE approval and does not imply a
par�icular mitigation ratio or reyuireme�►f. �`orm subject to change—version 06103, To Comment,please cali 919-$76-8441 x 26.
1 5�
I

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
„� a ,� ro s,�, ';".`r ,..,� y ;.:. . [..�� LX���q - ���.���RT� �Y�s�" �.w�
� ��� � ����L+���������� � s � 3�� ��r i��� �, " � ..�.� ,� � i,71..�1��
�� �=x - -:,�� : w,-�%s��,� ,�.�" '*� �.OAS�'s1I�' � � ��'",,"
.� ���, c � �-r a-��s,���.,., � .�_ �, ���I10.0ri� �—�4t3[I�ITk :v
.
�
_.� �_. __ .,,..., :.._�..., _�,... _._ ,��:,u,��.�_��...z.._, _._.�...�.��,.>�. �.�_,F�.� _. . _ -
� � Presei�ce of�lo►v 1 pers�stent poc�ls�n stream ',' {} '—5 fl--4 {}=-5 ... y,
�.� (no�Iow or saturatioz� {�;"sErong flow .�t►ax po�nts)
� �vic�ence of past human alteratusn �
�ti 2 ���. � . '�, . � � � , ��� � 0 ':—G ' #�—5 0,=5
�,.;� e��e�s�ve alterat�€�r� 0,no altcration . max po�nts} �
� ' Ripar�an zene ': ;
� � ;" (�o:�� � ' . •: ; , �:� 4 �-� �0-4 � �0�-�
, uffer .�,cont�g�ous,�vzde buffer ps�x�omts) � ; �
Evlde�ce of nutr�ent nn;chemical�isc�arges ; 3
4 �` � �� ' � ' ` � `� U�-5 �-�4 �-�
(extens��e d�scharges 0 no d�scharges max poarits) ' ;
Groundvvate�d�sckarge
5 ' ' , b-3 0.-4 Q=4
� (nq c�iseh�rge 0 s r�ngs,seeps;s,vetlari�s,etc:=maXpo�nts)�; � �
� ' P�'esence o��d,�acent flaodpIau� ; �
6 � � � 4.-4 (1=�3 �1-2
� ' (no�Iaod lain (3,exte�s�ve flvoci�la�n max�ointsj ,
,� ' Enf.rencbt►�en�I flovdplain aceess r�.
,�.r � y ` � , ; _ ; . Q„=� 0=4 (3=2 I
; dee I �ntrenohed Q,freq�ent floo�insg-.i�ax poin�
� ��resen�e o€ad�a,cent'we.tlands .:
� s � �� ` �� r� �' — � � ' �� � o.=� � n=�. v'�=� : 3
� no weElands--0 l..a..rge ad�ac..ent v�et.i...ands.-max o�its :
� � � ' ; Cliannei sinuns►ty� �� �
� � extensiv..::e chanriel�zatio; , � � � � �-5 ` 0 '-4 ; 0—3
, �
�
.. . n �Q,�aiural meander,=ma.x ou�ts) '
�� Sedi�nent�pu#:'�, � ��
� 1fl � ' ; < , ' ; �-5 �1-4 Q,.-4
,� ; ex�ensi�e de osif�on ,d,l��#te or na sedtment=rna�c ou��s
� � ��� �
� �� S�ze&dEVeesity of cha�viel hed snbstrate ; : �- NA��""� ' �!"-4 Q'-�
�y . ' fne,�o�nogerious 0;�arge,�verse s�zes=�nax oints :,�,,�� ��,��;
; Evidence af ekauuel in�isio��r��den�ng �`
�,� I2 ` f�-5 (l 4 Q-5 3
� (dee 1y;nc�sed fl,s#able bed&hanks `inax c�infs ,
�,,,, Presence�f ma�or hank fa�luires� �
� =�� ;�severe�;erosio���=O,��o.;erosio stable banks=max points �;=� �,��5 �1.�S �
�
� � � �no v�s.i...�� �t depth aud densify on�ai�ks �.� `� - �
�� bleroo# _: 0=3 fl-A� ; Q=�
Rvin
� s 0,dense roots t3trou out=-max po�nts} ,
� ` impac��'hy agricu�ture; l�s�estoc�,or i�nnbe��produc�on `: �
I5 ; � , . . � 0r5 �� 0�;=�# 4=5
(s.u....bstantia�:�.uipact` .a•ria evictence=ivax o�nts) . '
Presence�f riffle pnollripple-�oaI coni�lexes ; �
�b �:� :�. �. : �� � , � �1 `-3�`� � Q��=5 ; 0'�-6
(no rifflesfr�pples or ools=0�wel�-de�reloped=�rtax "oznts) ;
� ��, ' HalSitat eonrcpie�if� � �
�7 `. '�� � � . ' �'� Q���=6 0---6 �=�
� I�ttie or na habita� .. 0;fr� uent,'�varted�abftats; max po�ts� ; ; '
G�nopy cfl�erage oxer streambed �
1$ : Q 5 0-5 ��-5
�
no shadin ve etatfo�=,0,cant�nuous cano y=naax po�nts
, � �� ���ul�strate e�nbeddedness � � �
' �
_
� ��� .. '� 3
�g (i�eepl �mbedded �,'�oos�strite�re max)�.', �� x,�"�- 0 : 4 � ' 4
' Presence of�fream inver�ebrafes(see page 4);
�
� 24 = ; 0 '�4 41--5 0=5 . .
� �(noe��denee—.� coxt��non,nu�erous;iypes tna�tpo�'its) � �
� 2 �
� ; Pzesence ofa�uphrb�ans ;
21 �� � � �—� Q.-4� � �-4 �
t:'3 �a evidence "�,cominan,nutnerous ty es n�ax points)
'� ' Presence af�sh ' ` .
�� 22 � ` � , � ��� (1:'=4 � 0—� 0=� �
r-� {nv ev�dence=f3,comft�Qn,numerous es inax poir�ts)
� � ����' Ev�de�s�e of��td��fe�se , ' � �
; 23 ' ' � . '' ; . p-G ' p-5 0=3
; {no ev.idence Q :abundant:evxdence �nax po�nts). ' 3
�,{w ,� �� ,� � � ,� ,- ,�
y �ofaiP€rint�QSSibI���"�� .; � � ' ° Ifl� � 5��.�OO �,y. � �(�� �
� ` ..,.....ni� , ...�__��' .. . -:.� ...,�...� ._Wr_:��,,:::�.�.✓.'�,�'�" �,��.,..,.�;.. o_.a..,,�,.�,s', .. .,�; . ...,..,..,�_._ .:��� .m.........;''.._=�„�...���..3M ls,a m
: :v✓ , �. � -'��y .�i� r- � ., ra ,w ,.T.:c'�., �-' :.
, . ,✓•�� � . z.. . . _, K
/ `y
. �� �J' ✓��, � , ' ,,�' �,��� �r;�����„,�Li�V��1{L\+i �li��L�i4�..��� �, „,,,;�������„"�y.s..,..rwR-'� 'r
.,� .�JI �� �
-._.......... ........." , ...,w-�,.�... . . .._,.._�. r:il.r._,a., r.�..._,,. ..,.-,...... y,� .,,. .. ,.:..... .... ..... . .< _..T.i._.,., a...a.,�......... �:.,�.._ . ..;��,_« .,:..,.,..,...
*T�ese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
_ �..� _
�� .. .;t 2
� ' �

USACB AID# DWQ# �ite# (indicate an attached map)
„E„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _�::- . 5 S��
� -
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessmen#;
I.Applicant'sname: �.,c a� ���u � 2.Evaluator's name: �S�'(���rV`Turh�.(1�
3.Date of evaluatian; ��1�a 1�J�`� 4.Time of evaluation:
5.Name of stream: lit!,Fa �n{�(ti�.� �uk- b.River basin:� ��r�-
7,Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: �r''
9.Length of reach evaluated: jJ� �' 10.County: �,/�1c,.-
1 l.. Site coordinates(if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision na�ne(if any):
Latitude{ex.34.872312): , ��.�]�(9 Z� Longi[ude(ex.-77.55661i}: g�78�
Method lacation determined(circle): GPS Tapo Sheet Ortho(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GIS other
13,Locatian vf reach under evaluatfon note nearby roads and landn�arks and altaeh map identifying s�ream(s)location):
�i�^� � C�eNu JAV� ��iL �( � �crt �a.�1,,e�L �r��e
14.Proposed chanxel work(if any):,,�„ �k.��,,. �, --
15.Recent weat�er conditions: J��,,z.�, �Q..K-, ....
�
16.Site conditions at time of visit: s �.�n�,
1'1.Ident�fy any special wakerrvay ciassifeations known: _Sectiot� 14 _Tidal Waters _Essen�ial Fisheries Hahitat
_Trot�t Waters _�utstanding Resource Waters �` Nutrient Sensiti�e Waters �Water SuppIy Watershed {I-I�
l 8.Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point7 YES �O If yes,estimate the water surface area:
19.Daes channel appear on USGS quad map? YE5 � ZU.Does channel appear on USUA Soil Survey? YES �
21.EsfimaYed watershec�Iand use: �%Residential _%Commercial ,_,%Industrial �%Agricultural
�%Farested ,�,%Cleared 1 Logged _%Other )
22.Bankfull width: �� 23.Bani�height(from bed to top of bank):, 2�Y I
24.Ci�aru�et slope da�m center of strearr�: _�lat{0 to 2%) �4 GentIe(2 to 4%) Moderate(4 ta 1�%) _5teep(>1�%)
25.Channel sinuosiry: S�raight ^Occasional benc�s _Frequent meander �'Very sinuvus Braided channel
Instructions for comp�etion of worksf►eet {located on page 2). Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain,vegetatinn, stream etassifcation, etc. Every characteristic tnust be scored using the satne ecoregian. Assign points
to eack eharactezistic within the range shovm for the ecaregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how tv raview the
characteristics identified in the waricsheet. Scores s�xould reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic catu�ot be evaluated due to site or weather conditivns, enter 0 in the scoring bo� and provide an explanation in the
comment seckion. Where there are obvious changes in t�e character of a strearn under review (e.g., �he stream flows from a pasture
inta a forest),the stream may be divided info smaller reaches that dispiay more continuity,and a separate forni used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a st�eam reaci�musk range hetween 4 and 1�0, with a scare of I0� representing a skream of the
highest quaIity.
Total Score (from re�erse): /" Commenfs: �
E
(
f
E�aluator's Signafure �/�'�' v { Date � I� zrnr
- This cl�a�znel evaluation form is intended fa be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required hy the �lnited States Army Corps of E�gineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality, The total scare resulting from fhe co�npletion of this form is sab,ject to USACE approvai and does not impiy a
partieular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change—version Q6103, To Comn�ent,please caIl 919-876-8441 x 26.
� 5���

STREAM QUALITY ASSESS�VIENT WORKSHEET
�� � ""� ��y;;w^a'��..�.CL .,.,.� �'. � �,,.Y,;y„�'�w''���'�i �`,�,✓' ���I�E��U����������� � � ��ry a' '.
'� �.�--�.r �`1 '[� �'A y 3�`���r
a..""�r r � ��.� ��� ���l.��l�k7��#,ki3���-�;, i .. :.�� R=�..:�-"'�w,-y�.�"'�'"".�. �°"� ... �
'm �z�'"�c �v�,,�,:�:,��.�=�y -�3 .:- �a- ,,,;_x"�,��,��'r..'..n"�`� °'�` �Af1S�$�'�:`� `��,�CI��lUIk�,�: �011�1�R�r� 'r',.��^�-r,-�
,�^,�'.,:��„.::,��»...,,.�.,.�,:;`..,�`'�..:�..''.'w��..c-�-�._,..._�..,,,_:�..,,,,r,....�/-�....,".-�,.��...--�...za,. ,- �� .:�..:.r..-`.:
�"�� P:resence of flo�f pers�s#eut pnols�u stream W `
, 1 _ . ' p'-5 p 4 ' Q-5
� ; . .. ;; ��o.flow ar saturation O,:s6ron�.,flow :-�ax,ppusfs). . . . ' ` �
`' � � � �man alteraf�o' ��� � �, � `
E�idence of asf�; n
�� 2 : � . �TC Q;-� i�=5
� . . (axtens��e....a...Iterafion .�l,t�cs.ai��ra�ion, max'po�nts ' ' '"
:. ' �
„ R�€parian zvne �'�. � �� •7
3 �-6 0-� - #�,=5
��..(no buffer=(�,�co�tiguous,�vide i�uf�er n�ax oiuts �� ; -�� �� J
Evidence of�uEr�ent�r,e�em�cat�dESC�aarges :
� ; , � , ��-5,�� 0-� Q—� L�
� e�ens��e d�seharges �Q,no dtseharge� �nax�o�nts)
� � j G�ou�dwa�er d�sc�a�ge . ':
�,=3 4-4 fl=4
'�pr�t►gs,see s wetla ` `
(no d�scharge Q nds etc �max po�nts�;-. "
� ,
� � � Preser�ce�ofad,�ac��t�loodplam` � � �
�� � ;, , ,°�; , � ; ,-�'�� � : 4=4 0=� ���;-2
� (ma floodpl�zi� �,e�ctens���floodp�a�n �aae�o�ts) � -
Enfrenchrnet��i floodplain access
'� ; , ; , � ;: � �`=5 �; 0�-4 0-�
� , (deepl�:entrenehed 0 fie uent f�ooii�ng=.u�ax--po�uts „ ' 3,"
,
P,resence:a�acl�ace�►t�vef�ant�s."; s ,
8 _ , ,' , a=6 0=� 4=2
(no wetIa�zds .. 0 large ad�aeent�vetlands ..max, o�nts = �.���
` , Gh�nneI s��uosi _ �
� . extc ns�ue ehannel�zatio.n . .�,na�raI.ni �-5 , 0'. � � 4-3
.. � eande�;,=m� o�nts ��:' ��_ � � � � �'�
Sed�ment�uput ; �
I� e�tensz�e c�e as�tion {1 i�t#Ie-or no sediment=max ou�ts ;.; �-� �-� (1=4
�� ��ze&di�ersity of c�annel.bed su�istra�e ` � ��A� ,
', fine:�omp enous ,El,Iarge 'd�verse s�zes=�nax oints '�' -' - -
, �. � -� ��.�:
Q `� � S ` �
Evxdcncc of channel�ncisiori or 3Yiden�nig :
- I2 , , , U�5 Q=� Q'-S C� �
,'�. dee 'iy znc�se€F 0,stable bed&banl�s-max oints ; -
t,.�.� Presence tif ma,�or�iank#'ait[�res ' i
I3 ` � ; � � � :� �l :'-5 : ��=5 � €�=S S
' severe erosion:': 0,no;erosiori;stabie t�antcs=max po�nts
� ,
Raqt d�ptli and dens�fy on,ha�ks
e 14 ; . ,: , ; �-3 4=4 ', 0'--3 �
�
no��s�ble roots 0,dense raots throu out=:max o�nts)
� Im�acf,'Uy agricuiture, hvestock;or i���ier productlan ' �
1'S ' - � � ����� � ' ���� �� �'�� ;�.
_ _ ' �substant�al�m ac:...f. U,;no avidence-ma;e pourts] . ., ,. .:
Presence,of r�e poo�lr�pple-paal compieggs;
�'g ;: � - �-3 ° (1'-� ���-6 �
(no x�ffIeslr� ples or ools {f•�val��eweloped=rr�ax oints) '
� , , Hab�tat cnmpIc�ity
17 . . j �-6 Q'--G 0=6 L�
� ' i�ttle or rio habitat 0,`fre uent,:var�ed hab�tats €tuax points !.
�
�8 Canopy coF eraga o�er stre�mbQd p 5 ' � '�-5 0-S
(rio shading�sgetat�on=Q �ont�uou"s"cano p ,=n�ax o�nts
� ; � .. �� �.
�
, n � ,�,� ��,�-
�
, 5ulostra�e.embedded ess
19 ' , , ���1��� Q=4 : 0.-4
, ,; : .(iieeply eintiedded=0;�oose"struch�i'e=max).. : ������wW�� ` 3
Presence;ofstreana�nye"rtebrates�see page 4) 3
20 ,�. ; � � 0 �' � ; �J-S t�-S
(na e��cie,nce=0 comiiion nuinerous;�es.=.�nax oin#sj
� _`�resence of aMphibzans �_ �� � �
21 0-4 (�=4 0 9�
� na evide�ce-0,cori�on,niimerous. es �u�points)
Presenee of�sh O
� �2 ` ` 0 '=4 13-4 0-4
� uo e"vidence .:,0,common,numerous types=:max�oints)
� � � Ev�dshee flf�tdl�fe use �.� � � �
23 ; , � ` ������-6 t3�-3 � 0=5
; (no evzdence �,ahundant avidence max points) I . . ..: . ;; s �
:--� �- ;� �
�` ' �� .5�-"�'�"��ti"`�'�r i+:-: �, a�. •�- '".'-�-„ .�.-''=��"`� �,7, --%- � ;,r
'
'�q�A�P€IIIL�S�Q9S1t1�P � .' � a -'T �Q� y � ��� ��� r
�_. ._.� - .r w.,h _.� .,._'�, y�;�,� .;,�� ��..,�M,�..�<.. ..,,., F-,..� ,_.�� ,�_,�-� �.��'`r- �y�.�� _
� ✓
' � r r'""�'a''��'� �� ,�.r��� >,M =' �'�
� TOT�.��b� �a�s�e�ater on f�s�p������;� � ��, ��
.._...:...._ ......,.��'.._� ��_ _„�s..._. .�:..--'�"'r'';r-�.n,�'�:��r'i...;�-�..a,:... . �.�: ... .,.:�, . .�r::"" � .'�rs...^"� r,�:i.....:,., � y
_.. ,, .. ,.:_
. ...� �.,..._. .-: ,. ,__. ,.__ ,....,s = ,r ,.. _.,...-,�
�
�These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
;1�.:, � :•.�
� � ,.� �

USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W�RKSHEET ^�.,.� ��P�
�
Provide the following informafion for the stream rcach under assessment:
1.Applicank's name: �i�t., c� ���er�l, 2.Evaluator's name: F��(f���.�-k'��.���fr)
�
3.Date of e�aluation: 3���1�aa 1 4.Time of evaivation: �
S<Name ofstream: �t'� �/c L�I�( c�- ����� 6.River basir�: /1}�c.r�
7.Approximate cirainage area: 8, Stream order: ��'� _
9.Length ofreach evaluated: /�o ��- 1Q.Cocu�ty: rnl��
I1. Site coardinates(if kr�own): prefer in decimal degrees, 12.�ubdivision name(if any):
I,atitude{ex.34.87z3 t2): 3�.7 ��� Longitttde(ex.—77.556G11): �7�• S 6D�
Method locaEion determined(circIe): GP Topo 5heet Ortho(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GIS flther
13.Location of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks and attaelt map identifying stream(s)locatiozz):
��-�k M �ak � • � �-lhNy �
14.Propased channel work(if any): Gt.11cr�r,,.,� —
15.Recent tiveather conditivns: s�v��� wa�� .
16, Site condikions attime ofvisit: sun�
�7.Identify any special watenvay classi#ications known: ,�Section 1 Q _Tidal Waters _Essentiai Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstac�ding Resource Waters �Nutrient Sensitive Waters ,_,Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18.Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point2 YES (� If yes,estimate the wafer surface area:
19.Does channel appear on IISGS quad n�ap? YES � 2D.Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? � NO
2I.Estimated watershed land use: ��%Residential _%Commercial _%Tndustrial �%Agricultural
�%�arested �%Cleared/Logged _%Other �
22.Bankfuil widkh: � �' 23.Banis heighf(from bed to top af bank);,� �-�{�-
24. Channel slope dawn center of stream: _Flat(Q to 2%) �Gentle(2 to 4%) Moderate(4 to 14%} _Steep(>1�%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight XJ Qccasionai bends �,Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
�nstructions for completion af�varlcsheet {located ou page 2): Begin by determining tl�e most apprapriate ecoregion based an
location, terrain,vegetation, stream elassi�cation, etc. E�ery characteristic must be scored using the same ecvregion. Assign points
to each characteristic witt�in the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how tv revisw the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. 5cores should reflect an overall assessrnent pf the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristie cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enfer Q in the scoring box and provide an explanation in fhe
comment section. Where there are obvious ehanges in the character of a stream under review(e.g., the stream flows from a past�u�e
into a farest),the strea�n may he divided into smaller xeaches that display rnore continuity,and a separate fortn used to evaluate eaeh
reach. Tha total scare assigned to a skrea�n reaeli must range bekween t3 and 1Qp, with a scare of 1�13 representing a stream of fhe
higl�est qualify.
Total Score (from reversc}: Commeats:
�
f
Evaluafor's Signature '�'`��� Date � /a 2�
-- This channel eva[uation farm is intencied to be used nnly as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering t�e data required hy the United States Army Carps of Engineers to wake a prelitninary assessment of stream
quality. The totai score resulting from tlze completion of this forrr� is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigafion ratio or requirement. �orm subject to change--version 05103. Ta Comment,please caI1919-87&-$441 x 26.
_ � ��! f
I

STREAM QUALITY ASSE5SMENT WORKSHEET
N � ��. ��
�-� �,
,,..� � : � ,� �-Y��G[)R�+�I�JI'�PO�i'TT R�Y��{
-� � ���� �:H���T�RI�'T��`�����'�'�,���� � � � ���. ��� �C�R��
'�e'�� �" � ,,^e �. =�.�^�,,..,,.''�✓�' af,��,� �` . r
. �...„r, ,., v_.f, ».r-�..: � � ..^-� 'C�I►AS�'�E� �'�j@I�,J�,OII�� "``` O11I1�R111 � �
,
z�� ,� r ,r q ''� '�: ""���� �,..�,-s a � , a_.._�,..,».��?...�✓'^'�.�"`�..� �_
, .,;-,T .....-� ,..>.>- ,:.._..�."_�-._. "' .� ,,. ,.x�.,.�,.�...,.:....r_sx.�.m..._.t-,F.......:..,.... ,K . : .._/f'.-
..�,...,. _
Preserice of#Iow f persistent pkols in stream : !r
I � 0=5 ' 0'=4 �=S `T
.
' no#low ar safuration tl,strong flow max Po�.nts).
�-�
�"� : Evidence afpast humat�aiferat�an . ' �
�
2 , � .. �' �D-b �-5 Q-5
„
�` _ .. exfenszve alt�rat�on .0,no alteratxon max pou��j . , >, ;
_ �� R1pat�an��ne ��: � � �
, � : (}-6 �'-4 (3�S � .
' (no buffer -�},conttguous,wide buffer �nax pau�ts).
Evldeuce[sf nutrient ar ehemical d�scba"rges '
4 ; ; ; , 0-5 t1—� Q'-� ,
;.. . . : '�� (ex�eris�ve���ehar es . (#,no diseh.arges-=�a�c ouits '� . ; I ; ,;� �
� �, �� � Groundwa�e�d�scharg� �� � �
�5 � 0 '-3 ti��4 0-�4
(no d�sc�iarg� a,sprmgs,saeps,weflanc�s,etc,'� max o�nts� �, �
� ` ;; P�^esen�e of ad,�acent floodplain. �
fi � � �� . ..: . , ' �_4 0�-4 ' 0-2
<. ' no#Ioodplai,� �,��Ct�nsive flao�lp�aan=z�ax�o�nts) .. ; " - �
r� '
�` ': �ntren�h�nenf 1 floudpIai�z aecess {�'=5 €�-4 0=2
_� � �
, _
'� � ' dea T entrenched :0 fre..�tent flooding=.max poin�s).. :` ; ' ' �
,� 3' , Q
s � � � �resence;af a�jace�t�Qt�a�ds.�� ; � �
,� 8 ', no.w... " ; � . � .���� 0����-6 0�--4 0=� � :
etiands-0 large ad'acent r��etlands=max o�ts). ; ;
M �
�` ' Channe�sinuosity
� g , ; 0;=5 ; 0'--4 ` Q-3
� extensive c��an�iel�zaf�on €� n�hical�riea��ier'=�nax�oiuts .�'� ;. ', . � �
� �� � � �
�ed�me�t anput .�
� 1p , : , 0'-5 �;�4 Q.-4
,
ex�ens...�ve de os�t�on.=(1•�ittie.or.no sedunent=�nax. oints ! ' '
� �� �; �
,
--� �ize&d►versity of channel�i�d subs#rafe ; ��.-�
� �,.
1I , , 1�A 0:_4 0-� " �
�- �� fine,�io�nagerious... Q iar e drverse�izss .:zz�� oir�ts _. ��:�
� Evidence of ck`annel in c�s�on or`vlden�g ; �
1� �'' de.e � �" � �� , : . �,�5 ; �J�---4 �: �t�'��—5..
.,'�i ; ty�ncF.s..:ed (��:s�able bed&banks ..�miax points ,
� Presence of major bank,fadures ; ' �
13 0-5 0--� �?=5
� severe'erosion'—Q•no,erosion;stalile hanks

USACE AID# DWQ# Sike# (indicate on attached rnap}
STREAM QUAL�TY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET S� ��
f ,� _ S S��
Fi� E ��
Provide the following information for the stream reacl�under assessment:
�.
1.Applicant's name: o ��.�Q��• 2.Evaluator's name: �S �b=f-f` ��,�bk��
3,�ate of evaivatipn;� '3�/?.�g �.Time of evaivatipn:� �
5.Name of stream: (if i �fe �.�,r��n�..� t� 6.River basi�: ��.c,�sP _
�.Approximate drainage area: S.Stream order: �fh
9.Length ofreach evaluated: �D� � 10.Cpunty: �/�.ke-
�1. Site coordinates(if kno�vn}: prefer in decimal degrees. 12.Subdivision name{if any):
Latitude(ex.34.872312):, 3S•7�I1 p Longitc�de(eX.—��ss�r��):, �- 78. S'�{72(
Method location determined(circle}: �,P,�� Topo Sheet �rtho{Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GI5 Other
13.Locakion of xeack�under evaluafion(note nearby roads and Iandmarks and attack�ap identifying stream(s)location):
`L(td �'�`. � o� N�+�50� �d� Wi�� PoWer�t�4�'crnu.f--oLw�L near�+, �fJ-e� brdeN�c,.-� . _
14.Pxopased charar�el work(if ariy): t,t..k�.�w„
15.Recent weather conditions: s+��n�, w�rr-.
16. Site conditions at time ofvisit; rµnh., �+��.
—�
1'�.Ide�itify any special waterway classifications kno��: _Section IQ _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters �4 Nukrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-I�
18.Is there a pond or lake located upstream of tk�e evaluation point? YES �If yes,estimate the water surface area:
19.Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 3.�.0 20.Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE� NO
21.Bstirnated watershed land use; �0,%Residentiat �%Commercial _%Indusirial _%Agricultural
�%Forested �%Cleared/�,agged _%Other( )
22.Bankfull�vidth: ��C�' 23.Bank height{from bed to top of bank): -' � k
29<Channel slape down center ofstream: _FIat(0 ta 2%) �Gentle{2 to 4%) Moderate(4 to 10%) �Steep(>10%}
25.Channel sinuasity: Straight ,�Occasional bends x- Frequent meander _Very sinuous ^Braided channel
Inst�•ucfions for compietion of`�orksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
iocation, terra[n,vegetation, sfream elassifcation, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using t�e same ecoregion. Assign paints
to each characteristic within the range shovm for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review fhe i
characteristics identi�ed in t�ie worksheet. Seores should raflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evatuakipn, If a '
characteristic cat�ot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an expianation in the
comment section. Wl�ere there are abvious changes in t�e character of a s�-eam under review(e.g,, the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest),the stream may be divided intp smaller reaches thaE display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaivate each
reach. The total score assigned to a strea�n reach must range bet�veen Q and i�0, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest qualiry.
Total Score (from reverse): �� Co�umenfs:
�
Evaluator's 5ignature�/�� � Date,_ �/l o�`�-4� 9
_ This channei evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and en�ironmentai professfonals in _
gafhering fhe data required by the Uuited States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminaiy assessment of stream
quality. The total score resuiting from the completion of this farm is subject #o USACE approval and does uot imply a
particuIar mitigation ratio or reyuirement. Forn�subject to change—version 06/03. To Comment,please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
r
� 5��� � ��

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSM�NT WORKSHEET
�C'�,�� ���� �� i,..#.i��l������.TL��� . +.. . '- yry L����V'��1���1i'E���� � �5..��'.
.
��, 2�'f ��. �, ..z��3�� _, � ���"-�„`�'� � r �O�S��1 ri �1$t�lIll#Yl� ��OU��NYIE�=� ��
�,���-,�-.-��,:��m���`,,,__ ,.�-,K .. _.:... .,. *.�-�;�. ,W,. - ,�_
. . , � _M .. �:-
„_
� Presence of flow!pers�stent pvaIs�n stream
�-�� i ' : ; �, � . ���=3 0�-� �, 4�5
�- ;: . ; . (�o.flou�or sa�uration ,f1,s�rong flow..-max po�nts
�
y ` Evidence of past�uman alteration '
2 ' .. : 0-b ; Q-5 , U-5
{extensive_aitsration t1,�o alteratiQn , max o�nts) �
� � ` ; �� � 3�iparia?����e - � � ,
� ;; :: ; Q:-6 (�,�-4 0-5 Z
�, ; ; no buffer E?,cont�guous;;��d,e buffer=z�aac pou�ts)
�itlenc�of�utrien�nr�he�nitcal c��scharges ' �
�} , t1-5 U-�4 �-4
� '�, (extensfve drsc�arges fl;no�ischa�ges ..�xi�po�nts�
� : Grouiid�ate��aseharge �
�� � {��3 (1-4 (1-4 �-
� �ria d�scharge �,,�pr�igs,see s,wetlarids,e�c: max�pa�nts � .
�,� Pr�ence of adjaccnt floo�p�ain' ; J I,
� . . I� #� p ' L'� ; €�=4 - 0=2 '
� � no flood Iain (l�ex#e�s��e fla�od Ia�n max o�rits) ��
`T
Entrsnchanent!#��od Iai.n access
� � � , ��, � _ p'�-�S ��3.-4�.. �l-2
? , �
', (�ieepI.y eri#�enehed=0,frequent�oo'ding=maY oints) ,
'�` Presencea�adjacentv►re#lancTs ' J
S � ���� (no u�etlands-4�large ad[acent wetlands= �� �� �'� - U---6 �� � � �°� 4-4 0=2 �� `
— �t1�X OICt�S
C�annei sinunsity -3
� eXtensive channelization .4,�a�atural rrmeander�-rnax po�nts :...' � Q ��-5 (��-4 0=3
Sec�ment�put . , 1
10 ! � � � ' � [1=3 � ��-�- U=4
,:
exte�sive de os���on-fl,����e�►r�a seiinnent...�-�max po�ts) ���; �� � ;
` �ize,&d�versity of c�annel bed sui�stra�e � � ' �
1;1�. � � ,. � , ; ,� 3��. ��� ��=4 �=5
. .,.� ����� fiue�homo eno�s __0,large;':c�verSe':s►zes=�ax oin�s ... .; : _,.
� �EvAtlen��e c�f cii"anuel iine�s'son or w�de',n�ng ��; � � � �
]2 Q-S, 0=4 �-5
y+: dee 'ly incised 0 stable bed&I�anks max po�nts)
Pr�,semce c�f ma'4r bank�ai�ui es; 3
�M l�" `seyere'ernsion-.(}•�o'erasiori stable..bat►ks�max oints} .. ', �-S {}=5 Q=5
� ,
Raot dQpt�a�d density nn banks ;
� , 14 � � �" ��'' � Q �=3 (��=4 U=5 � �
� � �no�isible�oots i�,dense�oats�roughout max po�.ttEs),-,
� Impac#<by agr�cuiture, Lvestock,or:t►mlier p�oducti�n ° ' ' �
� l� � > , � �, � � '-3 0���-4 ; ��5 �°
substantial�znpac� :�'no';�vsdence �ax o.�nts)... . ,
�resence;4f riffle poollrapple pooi comple�es '
�. 1� no riffleslri les.or pools 4•�vell,develo ed.;:=max. 'oints 0-3 ' �.�-S �,=6
�� �.
� ���� � Habitat coinp�exity � � � �
17 , , .- d-6 �'-6 ; Q�-6
� 1€�l�ar��o hab��at Q,:fre uant;�aried°;hab�tat�: �nax� ou�ts�':
r-�t °
�anopy eoverage oyer stream�e;] �
1 S no sk�ading vegetatit�n=0 conffn�ous canopy=max oints 0 5 (t-5 U-S
� �uhs�rat��m�eddedness �� ��� � � `� � '��'�``� � �
� 19 ; , , .�„� �TA� U=4 0-4 3
� (t�eeply ern�se��ed �,�ovs�stejuciure=:rnax = ��� �_.___�.;. `
� ` �'�esence ofsfream�n�er�ehrafies{see`page�); '
20 : . tl�-� Q=5 Ow--S
� (nv evidenee :0,eommon,ntu�erous..tYpes=max points) .' Z
� �1 '� � Pxese�ceofamphibians �.� � � �-4 0�-4 Q��=4 Z
� na e��dence :0,cammon;numero�s' es-max p atnts)
� �° ' PYesence af�sl�= � � :�
C3 22 �� ' �-�4 ��-4 0=4 � �
� no e�tcience :0,eominon,numerous es=max points) , �
'� �� � � Evidence�ofw�Idl►fe i��e. , ' ' �
23 '> , 4:-b 0-5 Q=5
�...�; . no;e�iience-�,�abundanf eviderice ..�max pp�lts�
h , � � �,� '. . .� -��,w"� ✓ �. ,M' r � . � , ""�-y � ✓-.
� � �"� ��c���4a���8���� ��" ��� �aa � � ������� ��� ,
,�� ' , ,
� � , .,�
. ,, ..w:; . :...? �... �....M'',�-��.�.��M--.r,u_.,-.x,r ... ,,.._ _.. . �� ._�_waa..�-e,..��.� i.. �_:'. ,�� .�_�_���s ��;=='="�.��;:
�
' •,, '�`'.� ..: �.�"`y y, a����3-'�'.�""`-y'3r r"" : � .„,..,yr°w, F„;�:�,, .: �, ��..�".�y��'t.�'�`� `�` _ _
��* ��� � � � � I� �also�n�er esnxf�rs�page� ,-� " �, , � �,��;��A�.y�-��
- � � ��=��`-��y s �Z
._,r.,<_.;"* zr,•"�,�;.�;;.:;:.._.�,.,� ...,�-. "��������,,.., ,,...,....:: .... ......'._ r_�.y,..�......r. .,....:.._. r..:... . ..=:�,,. N.._ ..,,_..._._.c�......-..:...:m�-m...,.:.::._ m:
' '�These characteristies are not assessed in eoastal s�reams.
�
��,�� �
�••- � ♦j f_i.+ ,.�iT '�
��-..,�. ,� ,.!,"j F `+..`

���,
,
USACE AID� D��VQ# Site# (indicate on a�cached map} ;
;,e„ �TREAII� QUALITY A����SIi�T�IT'G'�DItK�H�E'�' r_,_
r=.
Prnvide fhe follo�ti�ng iufarmafiau far tl�e ste•eam reach under assessment;
I.Applicant's name: �k ^ ���1 2.��aluatar's name: �S`�`" �Z.�1'�v�r1\.�
3.Date of evaluaiion: l`Z 4.Time of e�aluafion: �i'�l
5.Name of stream: U� �'a �ca�u�a,''��i�.��,�C.... b,Riverbasin: Ni�t3:��. ��Va�-G?,
1
7.Approximate drainage area; k�b S.Stream or�er: ���_ _
9.Length af reach evaluated: ��b!^ �_ I�.Courxty: 1���L-��
11.5ite coardinates(if kno�r�n): prefer in dec�nal degrees. I2.Subdiviszon name(if any):
Latituda(ex.34.872312): �5�• 7 y�7� Longitude(ex.--77.556611): --���7�-r
Method]oeation determiued(circle}: GPS Tapo Sheet Ortha(Asrial)PhotolGiS ather GI� Ot}aer
13.Loca#ion of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks and atfach map iden#ifying stream(s)location):
1r.f�6"� U� l�k�v�-�Un� t�-[`S�� ��:��`" ����� !�� �?�.,�`�� �i��:����
14.Proposed channe3 work(if any): tS�A
I5.Recent wesfher conditions; �N�"„�a i
i
16.3ite eanditions at time of�isit: � C�S n ��l �,
17.Identi�y any spe�ial waterway classif�cations fcno�vn: _Sectiou I4 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout�Vaters _Outstanding Resource WaEers _NuErient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed {I-N)
18.Is there a pond or lake Iocated upstream of f3�e evaluation pa�nt? YE5 NO If yes,estimate tke water surface area:
19.Does chanue2 appear on USGS quad map7 YES N� �0.Does channe�appear on USDA Sail Surveyl I'ES NO
2I.Estimated�vatershed fand use: °/u Residentiai °/a C`ommercial %Industrial _°o Agricultural
0
�o�°fn Farested _°l Cleared I Logged �?°lo Qth�r{ 5�-`�+Jti.?�2 ��'+tr�tl ]
I �
22.$ai�ldi�li��idth:' ��� 23.Bank height(fram tied to top af bank}: C I
24.Channel slope do«�n center of s#ream: ��`tat{(1 to Z°/6} �Gentte(2 to 4°/a) _Moderate{4 to I�%) _5feep(>J 0%)
25,G�anzieI sinuosity: Siraight �Oceasionai bends _�requent meander _Very sinuous Braided channeI
�ns#ruc�ions for co�npietion of woa•kslteet (loca#ed on page 2): Begin by detern�ining #he most appropriate ecoragion based on
lacation,terrain,vegetatian, stream classification,etc, �very characteristic must be score��sing fhe same ecaregian. Assign points
to each characteristic vvithin the range sho��n far the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a br�ef description of ho�v tn review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet, Scores should reflect an overaIl assessment of fhe stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be Evaluated dua to site or weatt�er condifions, enter D in the scoring box and provide an explanation in#he
comment section. Where there are abvious changes in the character of a stream under revierv(e.g., ihe stream flows from a pastute
into a forest),the stream may be divided into smaller reaches khat display more continvi�,and a separate form use�fo eval�ate eac�t
reach. The total sco�e assigued to a stream reach must xange beti��een C) and �QQ,�vath a score of 100 zepzesen#ing a s#�eam af the
highest quality. - ,
Total Score (from reverse}: �� Comments:
i
r !
Evaluator's Signature � Date � ��1 " !� , !
This �}�aunel evaluafion fQr fs intended E be uscd on�y as gulde to assist landowners and euvironmen�ai profe�sionals in 3
gatl�ering the data reqnired by the United St�tes Army orps af Engineers to ruake a preliminary assessment nf stream �
- ' quality, The tatal score resulting from thc cam�Ietion of tbis form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
partieular mi�ga#ion ratin or requirement. Form subje�t to change--versian Q6/03. To Co�ent,piease call 419-876-8441 x 26.
� 5���

�T�AI1�T QUALTTY' A����SIVIENT'V��RI��E'I'
� ` # ' CHAIRACTERI�TIC� ECOR�GIOI�T:�D�KT RANGE �C�RE °
;e� , ,; .,: a ast:�l ,.'. .,Piedmont .?. DZouittai�t
� �.,.. . � ���no floti.�. . ._
Co
�� � sence of flotiv 1 gersistent pools in stream �_� a_,� Q_5 Q
� v or saturation=�;strong flow=max paints)
�� Evidence of past hu�nan alterat�on p_6 p�5 p—5 2
�:�-; .2
--�°°� - extensive alterat�on=U•no alteration=max aints
��'� - � � Rigarian zone � � �
��� 3 (n:o buffer=0;cantiguous,�vide bnffer=�nax aints} 0—6 0--4 ' 0—S
�
� ` - 4: . . �vidence of nu#rient or chemical discharges -. 0-5 �--4 ' ,, 0.—4 ._�
� 4
�� _ (extensive discharges=�;no dischar es=max oints)
� ' Ground�vater discharge
� � 0-3 0-4 0-4' � �
(no dischar e=D;s rin s see s,wetlands,efc.=max oints
°�� Pz esence of adjacent floadplain
0-4 C►—� : Q--2.
�� •` � {no flood lain=0;extensive fIood lain=max paints} � �
R,�� � 7. Entrench�ent I floodplain access 0—S 4--4 D--2 �
�� (dee 1 entrenched=0'fre uent flaoding=max paints)
� � - .. '
Presenee af adjaeent rvetlands �_6 p_�} , p�2
��-�� g � no wetlands=Q;]ar e adjacent wetlands�max oints 3
,� Channel sinuosity p—5 Q—�} D�-3•. ., : � �
{extensi�e channelization—0;naturaI meander�max points
r ;Q� `,, i � ;,. .., . Sediment input
0-S . ., Q-4 �. -p�.4�:..,
, (sxtens�ve de osition=0;3ittle or no sediment=max oinfs
� ��; . °':�" Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA,� ��_� p._5 : }
� " fine,homogenaus=O;lar e,diverse sizes=�nax oin#s �- �
�� `�2' - •�' Evidence of channel incision or widening �—� 4—,� � S _ . .}
,� ' (dee I in�ised.=0,stable bed&banks=max ainfs) 1°"
' �� � ' ° Presence of ma�or bank fai.lures
� ` 13' - 4-5 Q-5 � 4—S �,
(se�ere arosion=0;no erasion,stable banks=max aints)
Root depth and density on banks �_3 Q_.� a—.5 )
�� :�14 no visible roots=0;c�ense xoots thrnughouf=max points) �
�
� �5; , Impaet by agricalture, livestock,or ti�ther production 4—5 d--4 0—5 '`�
� __; (subs�antial im act=0;no evidence=max oints)
4 � : �resence of riffle-poollrippie-gool complexes �_3 �}--5 �—6
�6 no riff�esl� les or oals=fl•�vell-deveIo ed=max aints �
� �7' ' =:` ' Habitatcomplexity � 0—b� _ a--6 . �0_-6 ..
� . -+ ° - lit�le�r�no hab�tat=0;fre uent,varied habitats=znax aints �
- '= '; , ,, Canopy coe�erage aver streamhed ' �
`rv g 18.X , 0 _5.: 0-5 , _ .: D-S;
� .° - (no shading vegetafion�=�;cantinuous canopy=max oints)
- -'�� •��" Subst�•ate embeddedness " � �
19F dee l embeddet�-=O;laose structure=max NA* �--4 0—4
i•��' Presence of stream�n�erfebrates{see page 4} �_� p�5 0—5 , - �'�
Y�� � (no ev�dence=0;com3non,numeraus types=max points
�x ; 21 Presenee af amphibians 0—� D--4 0—4 �
�O� � (na evidence=0;coannton,n�merous types=max oints)
�Of � .. ; ; - Presence of�sh � p—q �_4 0—4 Q
22 �Q evidence=0;cominon nUmerous es=max oints - -
� � , : . �vidence of wildlife use . .
,23 �
. 0—b a-5 :. Q-5
na evidence 0,ab�ndant ev�denca max o�ri�s)
.y� , ��-;��a� �.�, �,,�.�: �. � - . ,� �����, �: �s -�" rt'�'���..��`sr�'`--�. �� �.:, : c
,_ z
- �'O�A��'41I1t5�OSSI�I�C x ��� �_.� 1��� Fs ��Q� �-,, c� Q�� z, �� �>
� �.L �
�s� ��r�� �� a�-� s � . _, a ; � � �"� . �. ,�� -�.,r�'��,
- �� �`�. `�� ��sz: � ti; ���'� ����� 's`��„ -��` °� '� . �J}
' �+ . �#�TO'�.A�SCORE �also en�e�or��rs��age�� � '��-� �� � � _
, �
._.���'�'y......:�->� s -,;,.�^ �.?3��,...��._._„�_, cx _�� ._'___�...� �-�§�.,,_ ._��.�'�'.�.�"r..^,��...7.�.'-�-
- � .: ,._�. .. . ,..... � � f� ..�
*T'hese chara�teristics are nat assessed in eoast�l streams.
��` �1 °� •.,
i � ' (ry� 2
�

USACE ATD# D�'VQ# � Sitc#55GZ(indicate on attacl�e�l t��aP)
�„�„� fiTREA�� QUAL�TY ASSE�Si��ENT WUR�SHE�T � � a_.
�F�
P�•oj�icie fhe follati��ug I€ufot�inattn�for tLe s#reacn reacL��urte���ssess�ne�t:
� I.Applicaiit's�une:Ci'fy of RC�[81�h _-- -- 2.Evaluator's na�x�e: Charfes Johns#on
3.Datz of ev�l��atioi�: 6119I09 �.Ti«�e of evaluatio:�:2;0�p,m.
5>r;�uue of strea��: UT to Walnut Cr�ek 6,Ri�•er t�asi��: �leuse River
7.A�pra�n�t�drainag�area: 8.Str�an�ord�r: 1 St
9.Length ofr�a�h evalt�ated: 50 LF lfl.Cau��ry: Wak�
11.Site caordu�at�s(if k►iozk�i}: prefer in d�cin�ai degttes. 12.Subdi��szon��nm�{if a:�y):N/A �
Latitude(ex 3�_fi?2312): 35,75068 I.ongiEUde(ex.—77.356611): -78,57184
h�iethod lecation detem�ined(circte): GpS Topo Sheet ho(Aeriaf)PliatoJG Dtiirr GIS Oth�r
i3.Locatioi�of reacf�u�ider evalt�3tioi�(:iote�earUy roads�uid landi��uks and�ttac1�ina�identifyitig s#r�atu{s)locatio��}:
-conffue�ces Wafnuf Creek a rox. I,OnO feet E af I-44Q;f[a #6SGZ-11
14.Prqposed c}�aiuiel s��ark(if�ny): unlcnown at thls fime
15.Receaf�wcat�er condikiais: he faln wlthln �$�loUrs
16.�it�conditioi�s 9t tiuic of ti�isii: Sl1l�t1
17.Ide��ti£y ai�y speci�I�vaten�ay cl�ssifieatioi�s lc��o�vi�: Sectivli ltf ^Tidat�Vaters __�__. Esse��tial Fislieries HaUita#
_Trvut Waters Outsta��dii�g Resottree�Ltat�rs x Nte�ien#Set�sitit�e t�aters _���ater Sttgpiy W�tFersl��d (I-1V}
18.Is tti�re a gond ar lake Iac�ted�ipsfrcan�of tlie et�tiiatiou pov�t? YE$�If ycs,cstuxiate t�ie w•ater stsrf�ce tu�a:
1�,Does cl��cl�pp�ar o��USGS q�ad s��1p? YES 'O 2Q.Does cl�at�;el Appe�r on U$DA Soil Surcey? �1�O
�1<Es#i�nated 3�atersl�ed 17iid us�: ` 60%Reside��tiai - 20 °.o Coi�m�erci�l 10 %Isidustrial _°fo A�ricultxunl
10 �/a Forested �%Cleared i Lv�ged %Otlier[ )
22.Bu�lcfi�ll�vidtl�: 2-3' 23.Bank�eiglit(frain�ed to top of�az�ic): l'
�+�.Cl2��ilflBl S10�t�O��Rl CC11iCi 0�5lf�dllti��c�t�O�[3�%} ____,Ge:itic{2 to 4%) . ,�..Moderate(�to 14°/a) _.St�e}t{�10°la)
23.Cls�uviel sisit►osity: Straig��t X 4ccasion�l be�ids „_,Freqttei�t�ue�der �Very siuuoiis �,$r�ided ch�el
Instrucfions for coinpletion nf tturksLeet (tac�teci au g�ge 2): Begi�by deteniu�tin� 11�e s��ast appropriaie ecoregiou based on
locatic�i�,#esraitz,�egetation,str�a�n el��sificatioi�,etc. Bvery cliaracteristic���t�st be scored�ui��tl�c satue ecoregioix. Assig,i poi�:ts
ta eacl� cu�ct�ristic n;itlui� t�a ruFgc shot�7� for 1I1@ GCOf�$10A_ PT�C 3 pivV-ides a brief descriptio�t o£ ha�v to rez•i�w t�ie
r��aracteristics ide�itified ia t�i�t�rorksl�eet. Scores s1�auld reflect a��vc�r�il �ssessin�jit of tlie streani rcarl�i�f�der cvatu�tio�� If a
clk�tracteristic eaf�not be e�al��t�d du� to sitr vr�{eatl�er conditiojas, euter U iu tlte scaris�g box and pro��idc�� cxptanation i!� tlie�
cai�uize,�t s�ctio��. �Vher�tl�ere are ov��otu cl�aages ia the clsaractcr of�stre�s�L�nder rcview(e.g.,the strea���flut�=s frotu a pastcue
into a forest), tl�c streasif tuay�e divided into stnalfer reacl�es ttr�t display s��or�coY�ti�uity,at�d a s�parate form used to evali�t�each
rea���_ Tl�e total score assigued to n stre�3a reacl.i�nus#.range bct���cc�i 0 and 1CI(1,«�itl�a score of l00 represe�ti�ig a stre�u qf tl�:e
�up,l�est c�vality_
Tatai Scot•e (frain��es•e�•se): 57 Coinsne�ts:
�
E�•aluator's Si�ature Date bI]9104
Tl�is cf�;��auel e��aluation • is ten e a e}�sed auly as a �uicle fa assist laucie«-eters aucl euE7s�u�neutal p��ufessionats tn
gatl�e��iag tAe da#a required l��• tl�e U ifed States A���u�� Ca��ps af Eu�i�ee��s to �nake a preliinfuat�= :�ssess�nne�at ef st��eain
qua[it�•. Tl�e total scpre resultiug f �n the coznpletiou o€ tLis fa��m �s s«6ject to USACE appro�•aI aud daes uat i�nply a
pa�•tici�3ay��nitigafic�u f•atia ot���equi�� �ne�t. Fvnu sub�ect to cl�at�ga—`•ersioa 06/03. To Coinniei�t,please cat!919-876-$441 x 26.
� 5 t I�r

�TREAM �UALITY A��ES�I�TENT �(I�SHEET
_ 55Gz
_ �, �� �j -- � -- -
.^p. II-
� - �.'�es�uc��f fla�e 1 p�r��st�ut p�a)s Y�sf�ea�n , p � �.�..4 � � ' 3
«_ .��"nca�.�w�r�a�iva�ioii_ �,�i�r`o� �iiu� '� ��.n� ....._._�'. �__�r�_-_- ,,:- . . ..,=".�.... F � ;lz�
F���Ien��fpasf���an alteratco7u � � � � ��
, . .T r � N .:'
. � _ � -'�-� � =,. '�' �...-� ': �1""'� �J� �"i. .�
- �c�ive a�I�erat�o,�:`4,nn�1t��s�i y�naX �an�.s _
� ; ,� itip�tian.�on� x-�_' U 6 ` (� 4 �1� � = 4
� _s� .� � �
�.-�r.: �uo bii��ar_. _(�;���t� . vs,,����ri��era ��_ es�nts _
.
... .. .... . � . . � -�=�-
� �_r
� � ,E�=jdence n���at���a���a��euu��I dis��arg�s ; - �
�
� �- ��ensiv��sc�ar es.:��,no_��s���. ma�x �o�►� ..�r;... U .�,� � � 4 �l'; � 2
��� ,�� �k� �; ��,+��n�n����'er�s�arg� ; 0 � �3-� �0 4 �: �4
�nvr:dss��e i��.,s�iz�ngs;���Ps,��e�an�,�te._;�inaxp�ints)_::, - �<,�._.__�_�v:
�' -�" �����I�RS@I4��-AA�����C��l���tl{���'.l1I1 .. �., � K ' � ` ,,.
6 � . 0 � �-� � �' � 3
- _ ,...�;n��fa�d iR�uF��l,��i�nsnreflos�c� ��a€a....W�ax .vu►� � _
� . � - � L�nti:en��men��flon�pla���ces� : _ �} � ��4 �#� � 2
` 1 �tr�tlGl�ed �y�C� ��flDnt�an �x 4ints
�
� � � �
� � :� P���mc��f adj���nt�e�Iands �# �5 t} � `�; �
u -.. .. �. �n��are-�ai�€1s [F,`�as� e�c�.�e�t ur�t]1ncls_ �x. osnts �. :` .�. ;
� 4
� = - �:��n�el s��uosif� �3 : � i� � � 3 2
_ �
r� _„�xten��r��h�nu�Iiza��-(�,�t��ua��ander. �� tisnts .��-�,
�.H � -
� �� � ����tlHritlitpu� � �#-� � � � 4 1
... .�' � F�� s
��x€e�ve r�e�aos�t�n�--�.I��k���r�o��men� ��pisints� ;_ ' `'
�' z, �
; �� .._ � � �Iu�e���ex-st�Y�of����uII�l�e���i�fra� : �� � � ��4 � �1�� 5 1
� ,�
' .,.._;. �e ha�m enQiis ,� �lar e,c��s��.s.,�es��� �msu� � � ,��,� _
� ��r�deu���f c�unel�n�is�nn���s�de�icu� ° : , .
1� � �- -� �� , fl M� , 0 � y � ��l: � 3
,..`;:: ._._,.,� �.. i,�incis� Q,_�'table.b�i�t bati�.��na�c s��tits _ � �: ,_,_..__ _�. �:�.� �.��
I3 ��� ' �"�s��u�e�£�a�orbaukf�i�►-�es.4 . � �� ,� ;� �� � �l � 5
�
- s�r��e�rnsicsn �t��no�ro�'c�n,s�a�l�:�ranks �in�p,�int�� -
; :
" � - � .M�.N�.
�t . ._.� �_ w .: .,� ,. .a
�..� .,. �-N.., �.� �..�, . . .�_.� =�3��� . �.
`, '� �` � �€�at_de�t�►�nti a�ensit��nn ban�� �_ �
�_��.:. m,.r,..n��isible�oQ�s_;�_[i,_�us�r�sis#hcau hz�u�m_;� �.�nts. . ... . � �a�. � .,.���L.� _,yT � �l� � 3
�
���npac�b�ag�c�I�ur,�,���s�ock„ni#iEnl�er �i+�rlu�ti�� � � y� � � �� �
� �
��,:: `- �..,�..� �i�stan�al�:. a���n4��den��:__ma�:° , �n�:: � s�x �� �. �- � _ 3 ,
, I�
�� � � ��r�� . �_ �-�. � � -:
��esence af�f�le p�nllr�ppl�-p9t�I c�nr�p���es � �, `� � ,
. �� 9 ���"x"°'�'� "' `� '�' . ��y ' ~`,.�...� ,.. �...-,>._ - Yl....,.. �,.:..\l � . � ' �.. � ��, � '�'/�
� -� ,_ �o���r�le�� , _��_�br ��ls .>�I}��e�.i����1 e�-ma� �►�ts __.._.:_ ,._ �_�_; _ ._-.�__�-���z�_,�.�_ H_�u.«
r � ' �I
�J'�- � " -� $a���at c�uu�ple���� k� , r,�,, � 4 ��~ Q V�r 0 ��� 2 I�
- l�it�e o�nQ,��a���k 0 fr--- ueg�����b�fa�s�����na�c :nint� _ �a
�- � �� - ��.� +�anop�F�Q���age t��er s���am�erl . � �' fl --�� � � �- � 5 I
__ � ... �
� = w�[�ca��Tiac'�n��g��tx�.n,.= �,c�n�u��.�nop�m�cgo�n�.$) - =.Y._r.�—,� �. __�ry � ....s�-:.� �-_��
� �� ' � ,� �uk�slt;af��mh�dde�in�s� � ' �' _ - � ,
�. �e 1 �tt�e�ded, fl,�a�ss�s��ture ` - �
-� � � � 2
� _ ._� �� ��= � � • I
� : z.
�� P���+nc��nf st►�aYn��u��'��hJ���es��������} 0 ', 4 �� �� 7 fl� 0 I
�� ,��.iio��det����.�3,��m�nuton„�utiier�u�..``�e�_ � .r���s �_ �;��.
�
�
�1 � `���� y � `����+sen€e n#��nap�u6�i� ' � ' �- � � � ��� 0
_ -=-� � � � �, _ - . _.. . ,�
�.,�:. , uo�t3en�� �3,c�mma�a►utu�'�vs....; e;c. ..u�ax ostits ._.- v„ = - =�-
;
_
,r� �:-' �._� - . ,.3�� �
_. r - � .:. .-� �� ��n� -- � ,�..ry% . ,
� 2� _ = _ . �._ _�-r�.. T" . Cl-�-� -,' .. . ��iY �4� 0 '
"�"� �' P��seu�e of�h �
� �a����nce Q;.��m�zvs�,a�u��rr�us. ; '�
�3 - = L��den�:�nf��r�idi�fe us�� � ;� � 5 � � � 2
-::._�a nca�dence=�Q a�t�ndaitt�v�de,n.,�e��.�ax �►._. _�. -�� � . __��-•,,_.�-
- - .
�.m., r....m._��r.. �_.,_ .� � _.� , ;. ,__..�� _
- - �
-- _ - 57
'�'I`�aes��1��acteristics are not assessed i�coastal streauls. __
j' �. �
> >��{��__� -
�

.S�C W
USACE AID# DWQ# Site# (indicate on attached map)
Et��t STREAM QUAL�'TY ASSESSMElVT WORK�HEET
Frovide the follo�vit�g infarmat�on fnr the stream reaci�under assessmeut:
1.Applicant's nam.e: �. �-c" G'vl�,� � 2.Evaluatar's name: ��a�� '�'��
�.Date of evaluation: � � b 4,Time of evaluation:
5.Name of stream: �Cz. 'G�' �7�iµ�-6.River basin: �-
7.Appro�mate drainage area: S.5�reatn oxder.
r 1 L
9.Length of reach evaluated:� ���� I(1.Gounty: ��-
11.5ite coordinates(if la;ovrn): prefer in decimal degrees. 12.Subdivfsian name(if any);
L.atifude(e�c.34.872312): �' �s Z z�i � �i _ Longifude(ex.77.5566 i 1): r ��• ����S
Metf�od loca#ion datemuned{cirele); CxP5 Topo Sheet Ortho(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other C�I5 Other
13.Loca#ion of reach under evafuation(note nearb roads and landmarks and attach map tdentifying stream(s)Iocationj:
' � � •� .:LtJ l � '
I4.Propased ahanne�work(if any):
i5.Recent weather conditions; �� �
1.6,Site conditions at titne af visit: � �"
1'1.Tdentify any special�yaten�vay classifica#ions known; �,Section 10 _Tidal VVafers Essential.Fisheries HaBita#
�Txout Waters _Ou#sfanding Resource'�'Vatexs _Nubrient 3ensitive Wa�ers _��Vater Supply Z�atershed {�-IV)
l.$,Is there a pond or lake loeated upsfream of the evaluation poant? YES �O�If�Tes,esiima#a the watee surface area:
19.T?oes channel appear on i7SGS q�ad map`t �NO 20.Does channel appear on USDA Soit Survey? � NO
21.Esti�nated watarshed land use; �%Residential �%Comrnercial �°lo Industriai %o Agricultural
�'/a Forested %Cleared/Logged °/a Other �
-------�_. ._..� --. � �
22,Bankfuli�,�vidth; �� 23. ank�eight(from bed fo top of baz�); 2•S
24.Channel slope do��n center of s3,i-eam: _Ftat(U to 2%} �Gentie[2 ta 9�%) JModerate{4 to 1�%) _.Stee�(>10%)
�5.Channel sinuosity: Si�aight �ccasionat bends Frequent meander..: �Very sinuous �raided Gkannel
Ta�structions for completinz� of woricsi�eet (�ocated ou page 2}: Begin by deterniining the most appropriafa ecoregion based on
Iocation,terrain,vegefation, stream classification, etc. Bvery charaeteristic must be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign poir�ts
fo each characteristio within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of ha��v ta revie��r tne
characferistics ide�tified in the«orkshee#. Scares should reflect an overalI assessment o€the siream reach under evaluation, If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due #o site or weather condifions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explana#ion in the
comment sectio�. 1T�here there are vbvious changes in t�e oharacter of a sfream under revie��(e.g.,tha s€�eam flos�vs from a pasture
info a:forest),#he stream may be di�ided into smaller reaches that display more continuity,and a saparate form used to avaivate each
reach. Tha total score assigned to a stream reach must range bef��een fl and 1p0, �With a scors of 100 representing a stream ofthe '�,
highest quality. �
Total�core (from reverse); Comments:
l`�
` �, �! "� C
��aluator'�Signa#ura �(: - Date
- Thfs c�anneI evaluation form rs intended to be ased as a guide#o assist landoFvners and environme taI professional,s in
. gathering the data required 6y the United �tates Arm Corps of�ngineers ta tnaka a pi•elim�naiy assessment af sti•eam
qualitya TJte totai scora resuiting from the compieti�t� of this farm is snbject to USAGE spproval and does no� imP1Y �
particula�•miffgation ratio or require�nent. 1'orm subject#o change—version 061�3. To Comment,please ca119I9-876-8441 x 26,
I
- 5���
�

STREAM QUAL�TY A�SESS�ENT WORKSHEET
,� �. z�
,� � � � � "� �� .��',��-��, . � ��� � � � :
,�� � - �
.�.� r � �� ���� �-� �
��
�
� � ry
_
.;
�a_ <
� ��, ,� �
����`���: ����� �� � o � ����,�:����
t u�� �
�r '� ;Prese'�u�.e��������'�,L�N�n �i��r.�m� ��,� � �1�� fl,--��
�' ���1c��3�►���a����2��Q��� � �, �, ,� � � ��.�,-
�
� ,� ,� �� r .w� ,,,� r ✓r,.� -� � -r
� �y�nc o �es� a�'al��, . �� �}� r� �3��
�� � �i:��,.....���.� �.��Z-�..4Y8����; .� 4SD„,t$ �r.�r'' ..��.r:��u�.._.V:,�a. � i.:� '
� r
��^ � �r �' ' -y �,� ,� � r,'�`,,,,._ ,--�r .,ro ✓ :�.,�'°� �i '� ��� � �
'� - "�" � �� ��i6� ��,.� ���
�" � . r„y.�,. �.�� � '"'� -�•� .�T._�"'s;�sll� r .:�
�
�. no�uY..;:,�e����.�?��aUS. 1�_i����ma�c , �� �
�'�*.�- y,s' �� �i�C ��I 1�E ��-�1- {��� ?.S�� . , �r .� ,,.,�� �.._ ^
.,�:� � _. _��. "�. ;,`�,✓��.y".�."s�.�''k���"�-� r_--� -� �."� �- ��..� _ � � . �i�� ��
. ,
�'�'� -w;a. � � -C!`l$ C� „.,�CL�'d� ��„�.� 71i� -�. ���� ,�.� x.. r� � r.r .:,.� .....�..r5✓.�.
� � � '�f5 ..7 rpe r ,,..-";.� �5 � �,� .:-r�.^'J,,.�< ryr "r.' .,N'� ,_!�` �r" . G
� : T+OtI1RC��Y�� �
� ��,Y �� :� r- � � ,�; ��.a � � {) � �
' �18'C�S��i�'�,���s� �g� $Pr S � � ��� .�$� �,(31IltS r �
� ' P eser�ce of�"d�accn dp��in , � ' ��� �
� b ��:��'����� �,�',�-,��� �� i,, 9 � ��4 �,� 2' �
� ��� ��R-�»� la�"9��'"�a;���� �Q���' �:�. ���3 ..r ✓�..,�,s._...m.�a �- r ' � �
� :F1
�� ,�,r���£II�lIIIC31���4���1�ydlil$CC�'S3 � "p � S�
� _ �.: �_ �ec iy�e���nchec�;..',4�fc�qi��t�ond�n ��'ax�s��.s ��
w. � �
c� � S (3 �
g ' Pre�„sene'�af aja�e��'�et�n�' �
` na # '�ds�Ot�e a�ac n� e"�tands ax oints � (f � �
��� �g j � � �
� 2 :
�' ' ��anieeis#��osit;� � '� 4 �} � 3 �
' � ��ctens��e,�hannel�at�[nn �1 �*tura�mea�der�m�c 9mts
�
'S�� w a � 3� �� .r r � � � ,s �'^� �,- /}
S�isd�men��in� � ��
y �� -. . ..,, :
;�� ..,,s�,. ;.� +��fens���3�qs�t���,9;4 i��i�cd�m�niR�ax,'"oints 0, � �,� �� �
- � �- --��� ,.� � .;� � � �
, ,� . � '.�����e�xs��,���"�e�anp���`�s�bs�lr��,e N, "X�;� 0�4 U S �
,� �r r
�
. �� - '-'�'" � .� +�t.' ..wi,�,y�".,=�*�+^, r�., r ✓
0
�i� �1�,InO P�llfl�� ��aI ��YPy SPYSf2},S .�113X fl�A�S� .ra�%��,�v'��
�''� -; � E�i � �of�`��� �s�`#t�`o���ii� �� � ���-' � � �
i2 � � � ��3 � "'if 'S 0 � , 0 S �
' � ��� �Y��.����ta�lc6e��ba►�����t�,�� � > �
� � �
� �`` Pres nceaf��„a��+�7t`6auk���Iures � �
� � � �� �, � � �� � �l �, 5 0 �
,�; ����er�eroslon na, �ns14� stab�eba�cs �aa7F o�its�# ,
` ��°f����t�'�n�[ie si�r�n.� �
---- y , �-��� � �,��1�-
� r
` nn�?s'� �roc�ts ����oo.,,�..�.. nt�, �, oin
4� �ST� �
,�� �5 �� � .
� 1� �Pac��y'agii r�, v�o`�s 9�' i�o'''��'c on (� S [i 4 !l �
�, � � 'su�s#�rqt�al�m a���};�n ey�c�ene�.�� 4�
s � ' �'�esence�r�fleA o�������.��1'�Qm��ex�s � � � � S (1 �
��. .. �o��es�� p��s�ir �fl�0�w�li�de�., �,.�.._asnts) �
�19 � �
�-�- -�
''�� , �bifa��.�a�n�it � � � �i � f 4 C� �"
�� t��s fl��to�abit�t��;��r� �,an ,�ar� ��i���s�m� ou�ts� � � � s> �
s � � � :�-��-�,��,. .� �,� � � ' � � �
f�g � � ���°����xe„�a���'����'e�aut�4� p S fl -5 t! 5
nos��dtngve s�ahon� �1,+ec�u�tqu�.usc�oP�r��n Qi�ts
1137� ,� y
,, �� > , � .� �.U'17.5�1'���ntlGd�de�n�GS.S �;. � �� � ��� � 4'
,. �o�,,� �C .�:��211�1ei��e1�. ���57���+'���,*3�� .vna.�: � 2
` � �� ��"es�ne o#'s�e�m�nY��e�r�� ����age��� 0,�5''
.: �� �� � �� �
°, . ..., :. ..n„m�1T�41$Jl���°C�Q�t�. II��T4i13 e$ �� '�Pd�11�S
s
� � � �
� ' ,-. ,� _.- . „� ,
�' �� ; PI'2S�D�@O��riI�1�ill]}��113 ' {� � � � O �
Q�:: I� Q��1Ei6Il'�. r����1110I� �iU1Il�IX1]�S P.S .A18K.�7DII1�S� I
�°` � � .. � �M��..._ m „�
�` I'resg�t'�af i3sh ' ' 0 4 b � � 4
�` 2� ��� � � �� �
ax oin�s
?�' ��e��de��>.�,Q��� �wne�ou� ��,.�..._ � _) .
�
, : -� ; ;
, `
� �� F�,�dence�'�Idli[eusa ; , � � �j
� �o eV�s����e �;���dant�Yld�ne� ma� ��s b ' 0 5 � f
i .�„-,/l'v° �x r.� vr r'��"r�/� y:.^ �;� .�Ss«w,,,�^;u^�'-,n_ �.�°-�":-gor"'.�-,r•" �' r,.:� w..-,�'��,.� i � '.�,a•' , ';L 'J' �.��,.���-�,..�:=.
,�^�.r r -✓-� �.. rr i ,�-���,���5t�]� ,. ! � � ,� -h� ��0 31 �..
_ '� ,y`�l.�r �9,.a�' . . � �^�,.'"`%
� -�� -� - ,ti":� r �,-o�.-�`"�s..."��^� ^�-�...r� -�x��. r - .;e. . . a : .. .
':i c�r, � � .r � w- r�.i ,< . .�✓«.�../„, "'�'� : :. �'`� � �'""��.�� /
: r� ^� � ° , x,�,..r.,, ,� .�-'�"�' .;` i"'. ,.l Fa...ay.� �x y�"'��� � �� �
. -v�"�.��' � N'�' ^�5, � �.�� :' �... i Q'� �l.-�ii� �fi � �` � -.?��, � .. "�y,�„' ..�w" � /1
v
�",3�,-. �.:'��_,.�,.,:��"„"�'�.,_�;��'=�„�� . ' S �.,3:��":�_.,.: `,'�"�,..<?.�.�.`�,�:�;q..�' ��".'.'.'�._�i��:��'�' J'. -
�;.�*.. T„ .. . .,.... _
:.,_. � _k..__ r_,._. ..,....__,.,
�-,__�..._.__✓�w.� �,.... . .�....�.... . ,
�These characferistics are nat assessed in coastal streams.
z
� ...j
` ' � ......�
t
...i'�� � �. .

U�ACE AID# DWQ# 5ite# (indicate on aftac ed map)
;,,,; STREAM QUAL�TY ASSESSMENT WURKSHEET �..r :
Provide the followi�sg information fo�ihe stream reach u�nder assessment: � ., `
r �, /� —I—
1.Applicar�t's name: .�f. �.[t�t-Z l � 2.Evaluator's name: � �'� � [.� I ���
3.Date of e�aluation: � �.Time of evaluation:
5.Nar�e o�stream; � ���.c� ��t.c-�_-�. 6.River basin: .�ll�,�.
7.Approxitnate drait�age area: S. Sbream order: � -
. L�� i
9.Lengkh of reaeh e�aluated:, �� ` _ __ 10.Cotu�ty:
ll. Site coardinates(if Irnown): prefer in decimal degrees. 12.Subdivision name{if any}: �
Latitude(ex.34.872312): ���`7 Longitude(ex,—77.556611): �`�$• dJ 7'7��1�
Method locat[on determined(circlej: " � 3'opo Sheet Ortho{Aerial}Photo/GIS Other GIS OCher
13,Laeation of reach under evaIuat�on(note neaxby roads and latidmarks and attach map identifying stream(s),Iocation):
�Ii�L��� ,s-� I�-.��.-e� , _
14.Proposed chant�el vvark(if any): -f!i �
� 15.Recent weather conditions: - �Gt�t�—�
1.6.Site conditzvns at time nf visi#: ' �'✓�.GC-
17.Identify any special waEerway classi�ications known:. _Sec�ion 1� :Tidal Waters Esse�►tial Fisheries Habitat
_Trout�Vaters �,Outstandi.ng Resource Waters ;W,i,,,,�Nuh'ient Sensitive Waters �Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
IS.Is there a pond Qr lake located upsiream ofthe evaluation point? YES�-N@ Ifyes,esti�nate the water surface area:
I9.Does channel appear on USGS quad map?.� NO 20.Does channei appear on USDA Soil Survey? � NO
21.F�tim�ated watershed land use: �%Residenfial ' %Commereial , . %�dustrial °/a Agricultural .
�%Forested �%Cleared I Logged _%Other[ )
� _ .. . . � . - � . fI . .
22.Bankfull widtl�: � J 23.Bank height(from bed to tap o£bank): Co
24. Chatmel slope down center of slream: ��'lat(0 to 2%) "�Gentle(2 to 4%} �Maderate(�to 10%0) �Steap(>10%a)
25. Chanttel sinuasity: Straight .;�Occasional bends _Frequent zrieander . ^,' Very sinuous �Braided channel
Ins#ructions fnr complet�on of worksheet (Iocated on page 2): Bagin by determining the mvs# appropriate ecoregion based on
locativn,terrain,vegetaEion, stream classification,etc. E�ery characteristic must be scored using tlfe same eeoxegion. Assign points
to each characteristic within Ehe range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3.pro�vides a brief descrip�ion of how to review the
characferistics zden�if�ed in tl�e Worksheet, Scares should reffect an oYerall assessment of rh,e�s�ream'reach under avaIuation. If a
charac�eristic cannot be evatuated due ta site or weatber conditions, enter 0 in the scaring box and provide an explanation in the.
comment section. Where�here ate obvious changes in the charaeter of a stream under revieur(e.g.,the skream flows from a pasfure
into a forest),the stream may be divided info smaller reaehes thaf display�oze continuity,and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. Tha total score assigned to a stream reach must range bet�veen 0 and 10�,with a score of IOQ.representing a sbream of the
highes�quality.
�'otal Score (from reverse):. T� Comments: -
,
, � •
- �•
, � ' /�,
Evaluator's Signature '� � Date � `� v
This channel evaluation form s inte�tded ta be used o 1 as a guide to assist IandoAners.and enviro ental rofessiona�s.�zt
gafhering the da#a reqaired hy the United States Ar Corps of Engineers to make a preliminat assessment of stream
quality. The totai scora resultittg from the completien of this farm is subject to USAC� approwal and daes not imply a
partieular mitigation ratio or requireu�ent. For�n subject to change—version 06/03. Ta Coinment,please call 9i4-876-8441 x 26,
� 1 ����

STREAM QUALITY AS5ESSMENT WORKSHEET
� � �
C�F � .,
oa e u�
rese c offio pers�s n_-�aol ,urss cam < � �� - '�
� ���F� � ���0=�� -5
n g:flo . o a � =a�s�o fl°.�`_= pa�n ��,� �.
;. . ... _ ..
. e. c :o�� a�s 'human�ai era 'on �� � �
y �� �:= 6c _ 0` _ , -5 � '
e e �: ra o�O��o;ale�a�to .�maac o._._� �� ,
� �- � -
� :.�_- �� .arla =zane - �-�,_.-� ^������6} ` � I �- ; - _
� �nt�z. �`ez�4 c� t:��ous�rf e� f er a�c ifi����, ��.�.�__.� � .�.-"� - - -
_ � �;,
_ _ _ �
�f `�„�deuc�u€�n���e�n�r�che����Iiar es�-: '-�"" � �
��. _ � -�����'��.���-���_ � Q,�� : �� Qa� ��� 0._ -� :, �
ex�ens� e;dtscharge��0�ncrdts��a�ge��xna��avits�Y�§ r` .�
� _ �`-""`j ���"=� �-� _ .
9 ---��rN�uund a e�° ischa g�-���� ��^��-� � � �
_,�;= �.�`��. � ����..��:����� � :����
(_ = se ar � p s, ee s��!ettands,=�e�a�"pout s� .�;������� - -
. . � �� ��� »��,c_ .�„F ,� �,���� z... � , _
� P ese ce�o�ad�acent�floudpl�'u��� _
_ .. . °
���. �`�� -5- �U-`4 _ � 0� ��
- �Ioo p a ��:�ex ens��e:flaa_p��� o�n�s�`�� _ -
�• �-� ,�- � " ��-- �-
- •� En.�re ch�n�n •--�Irsa[� �Iaiz�access � - �'���� �:� �
� �,�,.0�� 0 ` tl-
- -� dee I�e� ene ed�0;�equ fl o >�maac�po'ts)�� _
_ _. �, � �,�;°����.�-�.� �_�� ' �.
; � -- ofa�j'a �n e�a ds a�.�,��,.3 � ��� � �
=8 _ - ��� ����"� `� �,U� Q�4 #1 -
;n �. -etiand -��`.lar �ad�a�enf�v�retlands��� ax _oin ��� �; .��_- '�� . �
� '. �����a�inuosi�- �� �� � �����: r� � - ; ,_T
, � '� - .� w� �
� � � ��� _ L�.
-°-�` � ,P�ens�Y� ]�a�e zat�on�{�� a a�m der�snax o�n ���`O��S�ss"§ �`;�`=� !
�_.. � ---- .____,;� �����-��, - -
� �� _,..5`g[� �1T1 ll���-�� �-;���������� "-'� �- 4 - _ �� ' -
_ � Y �
�''�``� p��"� `�"
" ��ex s�+��� as� on- , i le:oz�rzo s�en.�ma�c o�u ,�� --_
__ � � ersi o cM annel:�ed�su�sf��f _ �.� ° �0�-` -� ..� �5 i
�� I�o eno��la�r _. di�ers�s�ze,� ;ma�a oi�s_�
�-�.
� - � �r
�,_ f de c .ofac anue�inc�sion�c�� de�i�g�-� ��; �-�� ,� _- _
� (l:-
°�,ee.�. mcised� 0 s a_�e � po�__�,�.��" -
_ _.._._. � __._.. --- _,
� �r enc of�ma�or I�ank:fa res �`'� � - =-� -
� � se ere�er sf � o<e.ns a �bank - a_. ,o -��r����0- 0==5
L aa ep h a�d�den�si ..n tian � � .,���,._ �_��� - - T
o° :slble� uo �4 ens o��Fir u o _---�a� o�n�,s�� - "
_ _ ae �b.. agric�l r..e� v.es oc . =a _ er.�.roduc on � �
E�� .' �.r,� � p� -` 0 Q -
' subs a� ae�Q n �:e .�' ence�-=,.___� .�...� =
�-e,senc�o �ffle�oo .,� pfl com� le�es-� -. ���
��_n..� _oo s�-�Q� ,e�d��e o � �m � oin �. - - _ _ �
_ --- _
r
- a a co 1' ' �
_ ��.. - fi-
•� - c� : a -Q e , a�e � a-'ats ¢ nm_.., : - - _
J._. _ _ - - -
.. a p. sQVe a ove eam ed '
� U�5
�s a ve e o , co �QU gcano_: , oin_�
sr eme � , - - - � . �
' ee m,� e =Q�oas�-s e . maa� :
� � i e c o �. rea �uin,e�. � a se ;_ age �.; � � -
� e e -• : ommQn e o - -��i� - , - _ _ �_ �
V �resene o �a pliibians =x ����� -s � . 1
o<e:'d`ence-.(3•�a n:numezous . - •pom �
a . �a:—�, �:-- � i
- - - _.... . .- . �- :� �' _ :. �.. ;
� �� esenc. o�` � ,: ' �-` - - - � 1
no. .� c �-4f•u . on n .- e o s� : - 3 0� .�'�
'iie e -o�. ..alif ns �� - - - ' �
- 2. ' Q--6 _��- � � -
_�u� en� Q•:a en� =`m Po� )����.�
�
��O `
�`These characteristics are not assessed in eoastal strea�ns, '
�---�. � . --
�; � ..w 2
. � ' �'.,

USACE AIij� � Di�VQ� Site#5SGX(i:�dicate os�attaef�ed ii��p)
„�,� STREANI QUALITY ASSESSMENT WURKSHEET
Pra��icle tue fallatiti3ng iuforin3tion foi°fhe sf�•eain��eacL uncie�'�ssess�ne�t:
1.Applica:�t's�aune:City of Rtlleig}1 2.Ecaluator's a�ue=Chades Johnston
3.Date of���ahk�tioi�: 6/19/09 �1.Ti«i�of es•�l��a#ioi�:3,30 ,I'rt.
S.Na���e.ofsrrea:��: Ul'to�Na[nut Creek 6.Fti�•er�asi��: �1eu&e Rlvef
7.Approxii��ata drauiage�raa: 8.StreanZ order: l st
�.I.�iigtli of r�ac�i ev�ivated: 50 LF 10.Goit�tty: Wc7ke
il.Site coordi�tates(if ki�o��tii): prtfer in decin�al degrees. 12.SuE�di��sian n�n�e(f a«y}:�I/A
I.stitude(e�.3:i.s72313}: 35�75551 I.a�gitude(er-77.5�6611): -7&,57664
It•ie#hod kocatio:i detes�nined(circle): GPS Topo Sheet io(Aeri�t)PlivtalG Oti�er GIS Oti�er
I3.Locatiaik ot're�cta iuider evali��tion(�iate nc�rUy ro�ds fl►�d laucl�narks a��d attacli wap identifyi�ig streaui(s�locz�tiaii}:
-confluences Walnut Creelt a rox. 50Q fe�t E of l-440;ffa #55GX-]9
id.Fraposesi ciia�u�e1 work(if any): unknown a�thls tlrne
�5.Reeeut ttieather eo�ditions: hec�vy ralr7 vvit�l�48 hoUrs
�S.Sste co�iditios�s at tiFne of�istt: s���1Y
17.Ide�ztify a�iy specsal watarway etassificatioa�s kno�v��: _$ectiai�IO �Tidal LVflters Esse�ftial Fislieries Habitat
�'I`reut�Vaters {h�tst�iding Resoiuce�Vaters X Ntstrie�zt,Se��sitiva i�atcrs _�lrater Supply�Vt�terslied (I IV}
18.Is ttiere a�otid or lak�locateB upstreaii�of tt�e c��tuation poif�t? YES�If y�s:CS�ttllc7t��Il��Ys7t�F St1fF�CL c'ifC�:
�9.Does cl�aiu�el a�pear on USGS quad f��ap7 �1`'O �d.Does cl�a�me1 appear oi�USD1�Soil Sttrvey? �I!'�
21.Estimated waterslied latid use: 6Q°la R�side:i#.ia1 20 °.'o Conu�tit�rcial 10 a/o Lids�strial _%A�ricultt�r�l
10 %Forested °!o Cl�ared 1 La�ged �°!o(7ttier( . )
22.Builcfull t�idtl�: 4-6' 23.Ba�k l�ei�l�t(from bcd#o top of Uauk): 2-3'
24.C��uie1 sto�dot�rn c�s�ter of straam: .X�lat(0 to 2°10) Gei�tte(2 to�°10) _Moderat�(�tv 10%) Steep(>14%)
2�.CI�1�uiel sinuosity: Str�ig��t X Occasia„al�e�zds .�.Frequesit n�ea��der .�,. Very suivaus _Braidcd cha3�no1
�istr«ctiaus far rnuaplefion of�t•orkshect (tac:�ted o�i page 2): Bc�iu by detenuinu�� ti�e���ost appcopriate ecoregiai�based o��
IOCRt20Y1,i�iTdlfl,�`C$t�c�?IOtI, S�FC�9I11 C�&SS1�iCA�fOI1,CfC. E�'CTSI C�1�1tRCt�T1StiC 11�[1S1 I32 SCOF�C�115113�f�1C STlI1C C'COIBgiOil. A551�f1�}Oit1�S
to raclf fillACc'�C�CYfS�iC iV1E�liF1 the ra��g� S�10�4Y1 �4F the ecoregion_ Page 3 pravides a i�rief descri�tioi� of how to ret�ievv tlie
clnaracfe�istics ic��itificct u�the 4iorkslieet. Scores slioa�ld retlect ari o�ferall assess��ie,�t af tlie stre�rat reacl�����der�valuatio��. If a
cl�aracfrristic c��iot i� cv�luated due ta site or t�eatlier conditioi�s, e��t�r 0 iu t�i� scaruig box aiid�ro�7de a�i rx}�l�s�atia�s�� tl��
coix�ne�it sectivsi_ ��'liere tliere are abviotu cla�nges i�fhe cla�acter vf a s#reai�under rei�ie�v(r.g.,t�t�strraui flQ«=s fron�a pastura
i�to a forest),t��e streasn m�y he diuided into sn��ller reae#�es tla�t display mor�.cos�tiu►uty,�d a separate fortu used to ev�l��te each
r�acl�. Tlie to#al senre assi��ed to a streu��r�acli�ntast ran�e behveei�0 tind 140,�zfitt��seorc of 1fl4 representia;g A stream of the .
t3ip,�i�s#q��ality.
Tntal Scoa•e (f►•o�n t•e��erse): 58 :Coinmeu#ss
E��ai►�afo�.'s Si�uatu�•e �--_._.._._. .. Da#e 6I19I09
. TI�Is cI�an�el e���l��atiau f r teuclecl o he used onit�as a �uicle to assist Ianctai4�ae�•s auzl eni�i�•m��neufal professiouals i�
g:►tl�ei7u� tl�e clata req�alred la� lte Uni d States A�•�ny Corps of Eu�i�ieers ta �nake :� prelivaiva��}• :►ssess�nen# of streain
qua[ih•. Ti�e fot:�l scure rest�3tiu� fe•o�n the coanpletion of tLts fm�m is s��bject to USACE �ppraz':�� 11][� tI4�5 tlOt il]1j3IS :s
p:��•t�cuEar tniti�a#iuu�•atio o�•t•ec���irecneut. Fcsrtx�l subjeet to chas�ge—t-ersion OBf43. To Conuuz�ni,�lease ca11.919-876-8441 x 2C>.
1 S�l�

�TREAM QI]ALITY AS�E�Si�TEN°I'WORI��HEET
55GX
� _ _
�a en a
�� �. �. �� �,, � � � �-� � ;�
� , Fi'�lA��`�i��IU���1QT�IS��1���IttflLS iti��i F��Li : Q=� � 4 �"{l � 4
,. � ;.F �:, �-:. -� �� __.. > � .,� �� �
,. j,� ��.�t3tiiF�i7�;���ItI'��i5511° �.�,��17 fl[fT�....r� i?lllfS _�' - ,..', .__ ._,�z_ �_ w.�:�� _r.�:,�r">�
� E��eII��f pa�t hrun�n a�t�r���n; � �➢ b ' �,�,� ��".� Q � �`"
a
n ,,., ��
� _ � e��r�sive��rat�nr�_--�,sao a�t�C�o� maa� o�it�, ..._: , '� `
� 2
-- .� ..: a-rw'�'��'�138T1.Z�II� - .� � , . '�. . ,G - .✓ ��. �
� � � n��uff�r �?��cc>a�ix :�flus,�side�+uffer,��a�r u�.�'s ... .. � £ � �1_ �- � � �� 4
, r
�
� . . � �� . .......... . �� _�.T]SX �� ...�- ..,�-x. ... '. `'y� -. .�..;. � �.. r f '
,
y<�' ��s=�t��nc�of u�fiz���o� che�ural discL� e 2
� � � � � � � �3:��� .�:
�,.:.... exfi�.ns���,�sc��r ��,� fl��d�c�r`� r�,.;.,:
� �� Y�„� a��Iad11II[�K'a��P��15��I��I`�� ." .�s r � _ � d � � � �� �
�IlD���'C�I�P� :.'tl:SPTIII�.S_���lS,r�?I����ll�x��C:.%.-=II18���'',�����=.�...= . -v,x.: c°� �..___,,.�: _�. ��:� V
{} ��Ie r-;x , ",���ES�'II��ll�a1i�,�3��t1��t14[�j]��ll# '. 'ww��,� Q � �Q� � � � � � 4
`� A�3,��0� �9.lIp... �,�RtG11�iY�.�QOtI I�il���7� II1t.S '
_ �
�-,
_._ _� .__ .. ,,,_ ..,, . , �.,�_.,� ,. .,�,.. r.._:,�
� �� ::
_� �
� � � � �I1�I9IIC�111'�EII�'���IKI[��'l��lll a'�CG��'.��,�° � ' � � �"� �. ��� � � ..�
T �.
. _. "r,T _r��_ .� 1 �li�F�i}�I�{� �._ .,, f#��Q�A�iA 171�K OII1�5 � � `�,�',° _
�� �
a
,,,:,�„-,- <n. ��� . . _:,�.rc.., ,...
r
_
-. , �.„_..e,_. .�.v,...,,..�,,. .:.,.___.._., ..,..,,,�-�.,4....w,�'� -�.' .f� �..,.
- $ . . �rese���nf ad��c��tt�ve#�an�s , W �rn �i �� �?�'A �' 2 4
` = .. ��o�tef:Iancls �lar e`ad a����re�l;�ands , tri�c oaunfs .. ..,: .. ' w
��anne�s�.uunsi�y� � � � s� �
�.�Y aex�e�ve�bausi�I��.an � �a�a171u��nd�� �c n� � � ,.�,: ,� �
,�
._ ._ N._. �_ v..� .e __. ,�._ .. ..e. ._ ���W �_.�. ���., � .
_� (�: 3
1� � : � �edi�ne�►t�uput� � � 4 � � ; � � � �: �# 2
_�i��itens�ve��pa�i�i��-�,��tle�rr�o s�c�nae.t��v amax po�ts} .,
11 ���t t3��et�i�Q�cI�annel�ed subs�r��e �- `�1 � �#'` � 1
�e��ino e��us. ,.,(�,iar � � �- ca�ts "
- � .w� .__ _ . ._. r . ,,..���s���� . � ��� �,- .�-�-G-�._��
�;=�deuc�af c��nne1���i�i�:a�i ��d�n��
..1�,:_ ��:: €1, r.�"��c� y�f;s1�a�a��bed��lbA.ii�''�-� ui�.�. ��..; � ��""- � � � � ���, � ,< 3
�
�� �.�..�, �'��,seuce n���a���ank��etures �,t� �� �? � d�' S 4
�
- s��re��es�sro� _r�3���s�osso�,stabl��anks �x�in��
.'�.,
: � �,�-,.� , �
' ��- ' �.tl#tf��p��l�II�d@IIS�iE�"4I1�7�I1� ���� �: � �': � 3
�
� v � 31Q�_S1�ll�S1Qt3�4�.�s_�I,IS_��_�[341�5�li�'113� _Z4�1�(71�.'. III�3 , `__r_ ��: —�— �� �� ,� ��` :
^- . �p�c�I��¢agt'��ultur��IL��tac��� #a�€�er�piocluc#�nu � �� �' �.: � �T ��,���= 4
15 �� , �
��ist�nn�a�':... .�ct�1,�o,�c�en�xnax-;.: ..s�ts ;, , ?
.. � �
� � T
.�._�. � �� � -�� ,� � �;, � ,, .�-��-..�-
,,,�� �� P�esen�e�f�#�e g��nlf����I�-�€�n�+���piQ�es a �� � � �, � r . 1
��,� .�� �,z-� -�-�;�.� -, �.� � � �, , , ��
7 '�1�0 4't��Sa�!! �-.[D�T ..0�����z::���P.� �.`4'�� P,(� Ylld'X �433i1�S � .�?��� ,`�-�''
♦ "
�
�
, - -�,
�-_,_;�� a_ �....,�,�_�� ,,. . ._ _._ ._ ��..
� ��.m�- � �__� _.._ t �.W .,_.�..�
�'��a ��, '���'� ��.�„,-k ����I�A�Cfl7Ylj8�l�� '���� � � �1 � � -� � � ��� � �
_.,.��.,,��tt��or�o�b�ta���fr , uen����ned�ab��ts�.,-�tuax= n�� ' _, _._�. v_�--- � t�_,.�_�
.�—n.� -
��„, _.:..`:�,Y ,�����'�nap��o3�i�g��tY��'s�i��u�ll� , f' � �" �� ,
�� , � _
==�__ �no:sh�dang�vegetatx�l��.�1 ��c�m�unus cauapY_.:�����t�s�_xT� �,z �� �.�: � ����������� .���: 4
� ��= � � �ul�stxa#�e�n�decTness'� �-- _ _,: �Q ��� `F �� 4� 1
����� � � .a ...,. c�e � �e�be,��ed., ,�,�oas�.s�i ic�ur� __�inax ��
„
_
. - �
� � r
J �� P��ence o�sf�eau�iuYer#e�si af����P����� � (� � Q ���
.� .�-:- _.,..,<.�u�v�d�tce.,:.��ct�mmtin,.�utnert�us- ` � �e, flints :�. ` � `' �
, ;:
. r�:< ;,k /. ,✓,�-',r�:— -'� :'� � �
�� , ` ,��,�i C���lIG�iM���jl�llbldll5 � �� � �: � `� � � � '�'"'� � 3
� -, '. ,x � �.- - _., .... �;. -x.:. . ',
r„_�r . ,. -r 3lQ�Pi"1i�AGP..�..�:G�)�1A70Y1,31111f3I�I�tli+�'-.. _�5,.. :�i]d7C �illll� "'a' . ..�._.. .." �. '..: .. ,. .:�r� .T._,=
1 T_ ]' " ..M �
— � "'�ar� r«- „ ,� �.4,..' `��1'4�$L�IC��1��S�Y...... � ;�,,, - ' - �, .. �: ���- r
�� �" � ' . �` �.s . ; ,��-' ,� �� � ' �1�� � � �. �- ��� �,�, � �� 7
� b ilO�P.�371�G� ��,�fl3331II1OS1�;IIt1�IlPrtil7aS... �.A,,,�1f1<1X, c33I1�S . , '' ,,r.,.,: ... M : .�a ..:� ,,c;t
' ��� �'ViE��II���[1�71'I�[�1��{15�� � � �i�.,"' �- �
�i�� -� .�,,,-� ,:� ..'�" �'"-'" �."�� - � � -�- : �'Q��� � ���� '2
�.
��.=°�, �[)�SrY�i1C& � ��11fl�$ll��VifI�C �7737C iII�S _ '- ✓ ° _
� � �,�
__-f.. .��. �.._._.F �.�.�,.�,_. �. . _ .. _��._��w- ,,,,,,,, �,-,, .,., . �� .._��s:��.:.��T'��'.,�,�_���.f.--,��_.._
a� �n -- - 58
*Tl�e�e,eh�racteristics are not assessed ic�coast�I stre�s. _
..
�_.,� �� �f C,_,
�

wAtNV7 k
USACE AID# DWQ# Site# {indicate an a#taclied map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY A55ESSMENT WORKSHEET
Providc the following informatian for the stream reach under assessment:
1.Applicar�t's name: 2.EvaIuator's name: ��tiAM , �5� _ _
3.Date of evaluation: �/2v/oq 4. Time of evaluation: P,M•
5.Natne of s�reant: �Att��r C�s,c 6.River basir�:._,_.,,..,,,,_�I��as�
7.Approx3�nate drazrnage area: 8. Stream order; 3
9.Length ofreach e�xluated: Zoo' l0. County: WAK�
I1. Site coordinates{if icno�vn): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision natne(if any);
� . S ��'C��.
Latih�de(ex.34.8723I2): � S • ����C� Longitude(ex.—77.55651 i):, -° �
Method location determined(circEej: GPS Tnpo Sheet Ortho{Aerial)Photo/GI5 Other GIS Other
13.Location ofreacl�under evaluation(nate nearby roads and landmarks and attacn map identifying s[ream(s)locatipn):
1�#.�',roposed c��annel wvrk(if any): e�tr�kK��-w�,
15.Recent wea#�er conditions: � ,Ns <
16. Site canditions at tune of visit;���
17.Identify any special waten�ay classifications known: _Section IO _Tidal Waters Essenkial�isheries Hahitat
_Trout Waters _Outstat�ding Resaurce Waters �Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Wakershed {I-I�
18.Is tiiere a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluafinn point`? YES NO Ifyes,esfimate the�vater surface area:
19.Does channel appear on USGS qc�ad tnap? �NO 20.Does channel appear on USDA SoiI 5urvey2 �S NO
21.Estimated watershed land use: 2p %Residential 60 °/v Commercial �%Industrial _%Agricultural
Zd %Forested _%Cleared/Logged _%Other( )
22.Bankfull width: �(7� 23.Barik heiglit(from bed to top o€bank): � �
24. Channei siope down centei•of strean�: _�Iat{0 to 2%) �Gentle{2 to 4%) Moderate(4 to l�%) _Steep(>lp%)
25. Cliannel sinuvsity: Straight �Occasionai bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous BraicEed channel
Instruetions for complation of worksheet (located on page 2}: Begin by determining the �nost appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain,vegetation, stream c�assification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared usir�g the same ecaregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shawn far the ecoregion. Page 3 provides x brief descriptian of l�vw Yo review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scares slzould reflect an overall assessnient of tlze stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather condikions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comnient section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under xeview(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest),the strea�n znay be divided into smalier reaches that display more continuity,and a separate fvrm used to avaluate each
reach. TI�e total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and lOfl, with a score of 1�D representing a stream of the '
highest quality. �
�
I`
Total Score {from reverse}: � Comments:
Er�aluator's Signature � Date �l0%9
This channel evaluation for is intended ta be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environraental professionals in
gathering the €�ata require by t�e United States A�•my Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
yuality. The futai score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE appraval and does not imply a
particular mitfgafion ratio or requireme�at. Form subject to change—version 06I43. To Comment,please ca11919-876-$441 x 2f.
1

STREAM QUAL�TY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
� y �
� ��TARI��TERISTIG--S � � „ �QR� R�N�E�� -��0�
1 E �I��POI�TT
�
� Cnastat Mnunta�n
t -��� �_--.. .,,:.�,,.�, , ,,.� �-_� �_.__- ,.�: . ._.,..� , ...�.:
F�e�mo�►f : �
_ _, >
P,resence of flaw Cpersistent pools in streairi.' ' x
i , , t1=5 (1=4 0'=5
:, (no flow or saturatiot�-Q;strong.fl,o„w max points) ' ': —
; `F
Eviderice af past human.alteratzon
2 : ` €�=6 �'-5 Q�-5
(axtensiv.e.alteration=�;no alteraiion max points) �
Ripar�an zoue�'�.
� �� �� �� = ��=� 0�4 a�-s.�
, (no huffer=Q;contiguous,wzde buffer, m.ax points) ✓�'
' Evidence of nutr�ent o�-cbem�cal d�scharges : ' � '
4� � . : -: � o;-�s ; Q=�� ���� o=a l
(extensive.�scharges 0,no discl�arges=�iax}�oints) ,
= Garouud�vater d�sc�arge l
�',�' S ' ' ' U-3 ti-4 4-4 .
(zia d�scharge :(},spr�ngs,seeps,wetla�ids,etc ', max po�nfs) :
�.�"�.r ` ' Presence of ad�a�enf floodplain` Z
� � �-4 �-4 Q=2
�, tno#loodplain E�;eittens�ve floodpla�n .rnax pouits} , . ;
EntrenehmenY l flnodplain access
� 7 ;' , , < ` ' U-�S Q,-4 0=2 �
, (dee�ly entrenched=�,�requent fIoading�rnax points3 '
,; ,
Presence;af ad,�acent�etiands,
s , : a=� o-� 0=2
(no�vetlands .=,0;large ad{aeent wetlands tnxx points] : ' Z
9 ; Channel sinuos�ty ` , 0—5 0—4 Q=3 �
(eXtens�ve cl�anriel�zat�oi� . 41,�ia�ral rrieander�=max points} _ �
Sediment input; j
�� ' ;. ;. < fl.-5 0=4 Q'=4
(extensive deposition—G,Ist�le or no seiiunent—max.points} ;
�� Size&d���ersity of channel 3ied subs.trate ���x �-4 0'-5 �j
(fin�;,kamagerious�U,large,:diverse:sizes=.�ax po.ints) .
'� � E�rdence of ch'anne��nc�sion`or�vide�ing ; � � � �
I2 - 0 '=S 0-4 Q=5
`;�` (d�eply u�e�sed fl,atable bed&bailks=max points)
Pr ese�cc of ma or bank fa�[ures Z
� �� ��� � ; � � '�:� � : 0 '�—5� 0=5 (1��-5
� (severe'erosion: 6,no:erosiori;stable::banks=,max points) ;
'� � � Robt depth and density an hanks �� - �; � � ' ��
1� , , p '-3 ' 0.-4 . ; Q-5 Z
{no v�slble roofs—Q;dense roots�l�roughout.°max po�nts) ' . '
C� `
� Impacf'by agriculturc, livesfocl�,or:t�b"er'praduction '' ' �
1.5 ; (s..u..bstantiai�npacf—�;�o' ` � , 0,'�-5 .�� � Q=4 � ��� �;�5
av�dence=max po�nts} : I
Presence:af r�i�e pooUr�pple pool con�plexes: . 3
r 16 (no r�fflesfr�ppies or pools O;uveli-d..e.veloped.=max points) .. �'-3 � 4,=5 0.=6
� '' ; Habxtat coinplegi€y '
� I? : ; . . ` �-6 0=6 O�b
(�ittle or,no hab�tat 0,frequent;var�ed=habitats' max;pou�tsj ; ` �
i--� -
Ca�iopy coyerage over sfreambed 3
I8 0 5 �-5 : 0'-5
� (no stiading vegetatton°{);continuous eanopy=max po�nts} `:
,�ubstrate em�ieddedness �
19 . ` : : NA� Q=4 Q�4
(deeply;en�tiedded=�;loose st�uetiu�e=�nax)� <
�' Presence'of stream in�ertebrates(see page 4�' ' �
2� (no evidence.=:o;comn�on,n�erous tS'pes.=;:max poants) ' Q-`� � 4'-5 < ��5 3
i�= ;
� ; Presence of amph�bians
21 . ' ; Q-4 ! 0-4 0�-4 Z
O (no e�idence=,4;common,numero�s:types max pav�ts)
''� Presenca;o�'�sh '
O 22 , � 0 '-4 �-=-4 � ��:.� � 0�-4 .
� {no evidence=;0;comn�on,nuinerous tYpes ,max po�ts) �.
��dence af�y�ldtife use �
23 ' ; ' Q'.--6 ti-5 0-S .
(no'.ev�de�ce 0,abundan�evidence maxpoints}
� :� , ''�'afal P�uifs Pass�ble � �10(l i�� � 1(30 `�
,. ....... ... .. . _:� .�s..� ., ._.m� .:,�.<,._ �__: _. �;� ...��r.
. . _�. ,. . "�� �.�� ... .� ..,>.� ____�! _....._� ,...._ ..
� ' : ;
; ri � , � r s,,�.�
��--� � `�QT�I����� ��lso�n�er�n��st page� � ��,������,�
, �
_..., ,� nw . ._ �_ � � � . � �"�
.'' ...,._�r-:'-. _ :�., rv�.��., �.,.,,_,.;.�. ._,..., a.� a.,_.,a_. A .�.. ,..._:. �
.. :..,.-..m . �. ..,., ...,.,., -.,, ,.,..-_. ,� ,._..,,.....-..>_.- -�,.r_ .,..,,
*'I'hese characteristics are not assessed in eoastal st�eams.
2

\ �``� �S �4g i � ��
�
QJ� 'o �i � I
� — — — � I
/ e .� ��, �O�M� - \ I
QJ��� eo se �_—_--- .� __ �e�� I
/ STq��0�,��� OQ � ��
�'p� I Ga ----- ��
/ 0 �► �
��� � �k��.��
� � 5���
+� > �� Q
��'�� \�� �
�P
s��".qs�i�,�� �'� �F� � �
-'O"���`�r�, �'� /' �",�� I
�8 � �� �� ��
/��� � _ +�� \,
�
� O
i �
�
2 G� o �°�X� �i�
� cs ��0
��y Q�
o��8 6��1�,q� i .
��22�j 2,��J�P S �
�6g 3 ��'` 2
°Q �Ox
�� �� �D�
F` ' Q�� x'l�
s. �0
PLACEMENT OF FILL � '' ��� �
IN WETLANDS `�� Q� ��
(60 S F) 6FG��w�s�qRO �s Q�
o�cR�x6s � � � /���
F r op
/� � �`�(/'
IMPACT TOTALS THIS SHEEf W ETLAN D �NALN UT C RE E K TRAI L
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): 'suirEaoo���sr
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): 60 C RALEIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (FT): I M PACT `/ F 818380875
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): \A/� FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): �� S T E W A R T

\ � lV 74�42'07"E ��J� BEGI N BOARDWALK ',
,
�\ � ///04/' � � WBRI- STA. 53 + 72.0�0
�� . O° � p� /
� �O � WETLAND � p�
\ A �� � WFl� �
\ ` G� � i�j � �� �I
� �� y� �� � HAND CLEARING, is
� � � � �
� � � �p TEMPORARY FILL,, D �
� � PI PF� F R � , �9
� � ' \\� � �'` E CC�'VS RUCTION ACCES �
'°C \� �� � � � (1,3 9 ��F) / �
F �,��\ � t�� \ Pv / �
� _ , � v
_�
��� � �� _ — — �;� � ,
� �
� o � ss
c�� /�/ � " �
��\B,oQ � � � —� —�
PGF F � �
F , ��
` ... . _ ) I p �
_ - - -_
� �E F F
10 CONCRETE
\ �, APPROACH SLAB � � / �
\ W/BOLLARDS�
WBRI— STA. 54 + 12:$3 LB END B�ARDWALK 3 ��
. —WB— STA. 52 + 2 0 41 LA wB- A. 52 + s8.00 �
- l � �
,
. - � i
IMPACT TOTALS THIS SHEEf W ETLAN D WALN UT C RE E K TRAI L
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): 1,359 'suirEaoo���sr
FILL IN WETLANDS (SFj: 1,359 I M PACT ^ �EIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. FT : ' T 919.980.8750
F 818,380,8752
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): W2 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): S T E W A R T

� �v
\ / �1
I \
0
� INSTALLATION OF PIPE � �
� AND FILL �'
P �P � (802 SF) �
� �
�l(AL 22'-36�� HDPE � �
Vb�D UA � �
L HEADWqLLS / �
� �
w�e /
v
� \ � �
� �
PGE , C�E F PGE
F - - -F- - - - --F - - -F - - � F �- - - -f- - _ � - - � _ � - - --F
-f-
F - -� ��°��-'��/"�-- - - -_ _ - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
F F F - �-- - F F
F F __ P
GE F PGE F PGE �-
�
\
� � \
�� �
\ �
\ �
\ �
� ' EST 9 Tp
EST 20 SY
IMPACT TOTALS THIS SHEEf W ETLAN D WALN UT C RE E K TRAI L
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): 802 'suirEaoo���sr
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (Ff): I M PACT ^ �EIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. FT : ' T 919.980.8750
F 818,380,8752
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): W6 l[� FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
DUrrCK LVIVC L 11•II'Hl,I J �Jr): "' � ` �' ` '` �

10' CONCRETE � �
APPROACH SLAB
—
W/BOLLARDS / �� , ` � —
O ' /
o /
� / /
� HA D LEARI TE P RARY �/
-}- N C N G, M O
/ /
� FILL AND PIPE FOR "� j� 6o.4 '
� TE P RARY TR TI � � �
_ M O CONS UC ON � pGE
a ACCESS � �
� � ���i �3,130 SF) �C�E � _ � _ _ -� - -
E— ' � � — �— � —f—
—
� � pGE
, - __ —
-- - - F
PGE ,F — — F
�� pGE
� ' F
�
— � _ � F —=
� �
—
���J P�'E �
- - �' � — � �a�
�� \���i � END BOARDWALK 5
' / � � � - - - _ WB— STA. 111 +47.01
/ . ( � /
�
� BEGIN BOARDWALK 5 � � /
WB— STA. 109 + 97.01 x 158.4
\ �
� ^�_ _ _ _ /
IMPACT TOTALS THIS SHEEf W ETLAN D WALN UT C RE E K TRAI L
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): 3,130 'suirEaoo���sr
FILL IN WETLANDS (SFj: 3,130 I M PACT W4 n �EIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. FT : , T 919.980.8750
F 818,380,8752
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): FiRMno.:c-,os,
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): S T E W A R T

,
�, .
� � � � � \ ��` �,�
� � � � ����� �'� ND CLEARING, TEMPORARY � �^
� � \ � �I� FIL AND PIPE R
�,� � \ \.` CO TRUCTION� "'.`ESS
/1' � \ � �k� (553 S ' �
_ �_ _ O� \ �
'��� �� � \
_ � ` �� �G � \ \
V ��
C �� �� <�1y \� END BOARD LK 8 �
�� �� � � � ' -WB- STA. 135+ .85 \ �
d � �\ \ � , ti , � /
� � � 10 CONCRETE ��
APPROACH SLAB \
� c�� - � � W/BOLLARDS �j� �
AcG). � _
�F ��� �6
BEGIN BOARDWALK 8 � � � � �(O\
-WB- STA. 135+02.85 y � �� �� -� S
.
\ � � �� \� �
\ \ N \ ,�\ ��
� 10' CONCRETE � � � � �� � � /� ��
�� APPROACH SLAB ►`� \ � / ,/
� W/BOLLARDS a \ � �� �,� ��� / � �G)A
�.n � � ���� �� � �� �� � k2 °
v � � o� � �� i��� ���
y � � > ) `�'��� '� � �G
� � � � � � ��
�� �� �%� \
�/ � � \
IMPACT TOTALS THIS SHEEf W ETLAN D WALN UT C RE E K TRAI L
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): 553 'suirEaoo���sr
� , I M PACT ^ �EIGH,NC27607
FILL IN WETLANDS SF : 553 T 919.980.8750
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. FT : ' F 8183808752
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): W 5 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): S T E W A R T

, WE��LAND WF23 F � QLLOWAB�E zMP��TS oNE 1
� ANNIE ON �d � q��oWqB�E IMP��TS ZoN �
m I � ,. DB 93/,PG 6 ss
� 0 � PlN 1723605680 oi0l� �
�� �-� P
� BEGIN ONSTRUCTION -���� SP���`�
� TIE TO XISTING TRAIL � SS �'� ��� `�� P ��
I RP��\g� �
� N � —L2— ST . 10 + 00.00 S
N � � � � ���
6 � � �
I ' � � � �I F ��S�o�
r� � / �� �\� 3 P��S��� � ��
. r
I ' �� P�������23 �°'
; � �
� � P
I � �a
��
° '��P —� —� — — `
;'� � _ — _ ,
I �
! ��, `-�� �� �
, ��
i �' -
%� �� �' � � �
� , -'�- x ,�� �� � �
��5� � � ,
I � �� �� .� � �\
' l \�
—X �� �'� \
x �`
I S J�oo QO' � o---X .,\ ��
; oo.p�- E � � � �2•
K ��'�� � �k \� ,
� �,, � � ��
�� _� � � �����- � �� \
y �\ �` � � � ���' � � � �\V�\�
\ ��� � �� \ ,� Q�
, ,
IMPACTTOTALSTHISSHEEf gUFFER WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
421 FAYEITEVILLE ST
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): i suireaoo
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): I M PACT B 1 RALEIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (FT): S F 818380875
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): 1,182 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): 952 S T E W A R T

S� \ p -, , �" � /� /
� � /� `�%� �/ � �
� � / / � �� I
.
� � �o � ,
`� ���
�� � � � � �F�� qNj q�y �
/� qS
� � ��-�,'�,,F�FNT � - - - �
/ / v, �� �� � a� �Q' CO,.,��i�ETE
�c, a SS `� APP�.R���,H SLAB
� ,�o � W/BOLLARDS
�O ,°'
O / �'" END BOARDWALK 2
� � �� -WBRI- STA. 46+47.50
y � 5`' �
� J QG� /"��/ � ST
/ -�. '\
� a � /� � '�
SS /
• /' '/' �
V QGE , /��
�ti ,
.�/ ,68 5
,r '' � � 69 0
� / �� `t
'Q FW
� FW
PGE FW
Bti 1
/ �'� �
/' Q./ RLLOWRBLE IMPRCTS ZONE 1
�,.- V{.
/ .
� ALLOWRBLE IMPRCTS ZONE 2
/' � ,_
IMPACTTOTALSTHISSHEEf gUFFER WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
421 FAYEITEVILLE ST
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): suireaoo
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): I M PACT B� RALEIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (FT): S F 818380875
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): 4,487 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): 1,304 S T E W A R T

o�
\ TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 2A
RLLOW(BLE IMPRCTS ZONE 1 I ^'
\ �
� (� 1 � QLLOWQBLE IMPQCTS ZONE 2
� �V
� N �
�� 10' CONCRETE �
APPROACH SLAB �
p W/BOLLARDS � �/
� � �•
O X�
y��- I� � �j O
� p, / �6.2 � �/
� �o
P PGE P E PGE PGE
— � - -F- - - -C� � _ � _ Q�
� ��
— F — —� --
F F F F F — F �
PGE F _ o — — _
-- p,GE PGE 3 �/' I
� P� O�r „
� X �60. � o
� � FW — � � �j, —
s��'s�� o. � Fw � �55 2 �
��.o . ,,
� �� BEGI BOARDWALK 6 F� C�
—W� STA. 118+33.42 _
\ /
� y� � j
\ o-
IMPACTTOTALSTHISSHEEf gUFFER WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
421 FAYEITEVILLE ST
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): suireaoo
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): I M PACT B� RALEIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (FT): S F 818380875
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): 1,956 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): 1,315 S T E W A R T

BlM- '^
Q` ..�
� � \ f� � � � I � I � � � �
.
o k�6., / �— -�
� ��h 1 I I I `� 4 / �� c
� \ / i �sc.z
/ / !
C � F
��y // 3/ '� 3.3 / / / �/3�Jd 0 i,
c,w Y� � tQ��x� ' / � �¢� �
,�,� � P� 5 , k 6' ,' �: ` ��,X�.
I A � -p�
� ,634 ` 0 ��� G�V
�. k O 1
o ���'`�Fro,,s � �,,� � 0��\�� 1o`P o�S
° � o
I � �Q�,�1�
's, 6` d
��� �F�o '� ' �� � I� k � ��'x, ° � �
S�.q ii��'PQ� � i ��'o,�s I
�� ����'��o���� � P� gtoJ22+57� , �'o. � � V ��
�� � �� � � ��
��� � ,��I � � - � ��� � s
�c��r I \
'yO.o — � ` ,�
��5,�����'�S. ��� � � �� ¢ »so
TEMPORARY BUFFER IMPACTS ���� �\\ �
FOR BRIDG 5��� Sy' � �,o� �. J�� � �� �
•���• ^� cn � � S �
.--�.. `
� � � k I / �d ..0�� �; � 46 87.1 � I
\ y m ^'
�'\ � Z � � ►rj / \_ / � I
�F�� � � $ � * ,, /` �-, ��
<Y ti F •. � --�...N o
�• 6 �p y �' � � ~ ` — �
sFF cGR sr�?Rp��i�G � /y a`� ' `L� c
ac�j.qi�h, stX?��f E`� � ., e � oeC ���p"'���2� I
sy�,���c �8s/ F � rR� ,�PS'��'h(��,(la�° )
� c � � � � A o� ������3 �h
c e�' \ � Q
szsstszrDrS � I ��r � � � N
� .� � x �
� � � �-� -� ° �
�
� � i �� �
Rti� ., �
pry/± � � eM�?�� t� � �
77 7�'f�`��S 1 � W �Q�25't2��� J�7-0��,-�N/732��g�� � p
��j� .n �
�I i s����•fhc' \ �!' O I,����'��G' �S� � 2, I
/ 2 :� c� r
\/ ��s���j.ti` I ���ss \ y�,g°�, q A��owRe�E IMPRCrs zoNE 1
�Yc�'1•� �= .o� i'�
�C' ! F ?`�S`iOG�C'
� � �'�a C ��'t'p �c''�, �S
�`D — �6 O,�CC Sp�� � ���'S� � ALLOWABLE IMPRCTS ZONE 2 �
`f5`
IMPACTTOTALSTHISSHEEf gUFFER WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
421 FAYEITEVILLE ST
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): suireaoo
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): I M PACT B4 RALEIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (FT): S F 818380875
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): 12,056 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): 7,290 S T E W A R T

� p
�� � ` � � END BOARD LK 8
�� �� �� � - `� -WB- STA. 13�5+ .85
d � \, �
� � � \ , . �;/
� � � � 10 CONCRE�`f �
� APPROACH SLAB � � �6
c�� - � � W/BOLLARDS � 0 `
�\ � 6 � .
F \ �
BEGIN BOARDWALK 8 � � � � � 5'�O�
-WB- STA. 135+02.85 y� � F �\ �-� ` /�
.
N \ \ � � � � i� i
+ �� i i
�� 10' CONCRETE � � � � � /� /�
� APPROACH SLAB ►� \ \ �,� , / ,/
' W/BOLLARDS � � \ Q� , / G�
� � �� � ��� , � � ���.
� � � C�\ /� /� �
, � � �� � �� � ��
� � CS��� / �
y� � �� �,� �G
°' J �
I o � ! // /\
/ � /� ////�/ �\\
� � l �
� / ��//�/ / nl
� / / / I
� / �I
�-m / / / � � /�/f' �
/ / �� / /�/ / ��
RLLOWRBLE IMPRCTS ZONE 1 / Q / % � / IJ
� RLLOWABLE IMP(CTS ZONE 2 � � / / / / l
� � / / � � /
�
IMPACTTOTALSTHISSHEEf gUFFER WALNUT CREEK TRAIL
421 FAYEITEVILLE ST
HAND CLEARING IN WETLANDS (SF): C suireaoo
FILL IN WETLANDS (SF): I M PACT B J RALEIGH,NC27607
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS PERM. (FT): S F 818380875
EXIST. CHANNEL IMPACTS TEMP. (FT): """'°'�"-�"g�°'"
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS (SF): 6 FIRMNO.:C-iQ57
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS (SF): 2,999 S T E W A R T

Hydro Computation (Hydraulic Analysis)
'� ' By: JH Date: 10/6/2008
� � Checked: DB Date: 10/6/2008
STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Hydraulic Design Criteria
Intensit -Duration-�re uenc Table Ralei h-Durham, NC
Return Period
2 yr. 5 yr. 10 yr. 25 yr. 50 yr. 100 yr.
Duration ��n/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) in/hr
5 min. 5.76 6.58 7.22 8.19 8.96 9.72
10 min. 4.76 5.54 6.13 7.01 7.71 8.40
15 min. 4.04 4.74 5.25 6.03 6.64 7.24
30 min. 2.70 3.28 3.71 4.32 4.80 5.28
60 min. 1.70 2.12 2.41 2.84 3.17 3.50
120 min. 0.95 1.20 1.37 1.62 1.81 2.00
180 min. 0.71 0.89 1.02 1.21 1.35 1.50
360 min. 0.44 0.56 0.65 0.77 0.86 0.96
720 min. 0.26 0.33 0.39 0.46 0.52 0.57
1440 min. 0.15 0.19 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.33
5 min 5.76 6.58 7.22 8.19 8.96 9.72
TT �min 6.76 7.62 8.31 9.37 10.21 11.04
10 min 4.76 5.54 6.13 7.01 7.71 8.40
TT �min 6.20 7.14 7.89 8.97 9.85 10.72
15 min 4.04 4.74 5.25 6.03 6.64 7.24
TT �m i n 5.38 6.20 6.79 7.74 8.48 9.20
30 min 2.70 3.28 3.71 4.32 4.80 5.28
TT �min 3.70 4.44 5.01 5.80 6.43 7.06
60 min 1.70 2.12 2.41 2.84 3.17 3.50
TT �m i n 2.45 3.04 3.45 4.06 4.53 5.00
120 min 0.95 1.20 1.37 1.62 1.81 2.00
TT �min 1.43 1.82 2.07 2.44 2.73 3.00
180 min 0.71 0.89 1.02 1.21 1.35 1.50
TT �min 0.98 1.22 1.39 1.65 1.84 2.04
360 min 0.44 0.56 0.65 0.77 0.86 0.96
TT �min 0.62 0.79 0.91 1.08 1.20 1.35
720 min 0.26 0.33 0.39 0.46 0.52 0.57
, _,w_._._w.. _ _._ ._.._____ __.- ..� __�._____. __�.___._.�_...w� � __ _w__..__.__�� _� �w_�__ ___�___.�_.__.__
_ _�_� .__ ,__�______ �___,T,�_� �.�__ rri�n 0.$7 0.47 0.56 0.65 0.74 0.81
1440 min 0.15 0.19 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.33

Culvert.Computation; <{t�yarau�ic ana�ysis) -. :� , :> �:
��° �� � �By: CC Date:� 6/4/2010
�
���<,'` Checked: BRC Date: 6/21/2010
STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culverts 1 & 2
Location: 14+63 &25+30 -L1-
Rational Method.=.Culvert'1, ,; ; _$:
Culvert Area Intensity C-Value Q10 Flow
(ac) (in/hr) (cfs)
1 0.080 7.220 0.620 0.358
� . �� �� � �. � �� ��� < d �� � �s
Rational Method :�uluert2 �� ��.,���zx . .��,� . . � � �`��;r�� ���.z, 3 �`��� ���,�����,�������°�.�,��, � ��.
�
Culvert Area Intensity C-Value Q10 Flow
(ac) (in/hr) (cfs)
2 0.100 7.220 0.650 0.469

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Cuivert 1 - Sta. 14+60 -L1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 0.36 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 0.36 cfs Check Discharge 0.45 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 198.90 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-15 inch Circular 0.36 cfs 202.35 ft 0.38 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatio�1j.00 cfs 202.35 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 0.36 cfs 202.35 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cuilipher
t:\...\cuiverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:20:45�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 1 - Sta. 14+60 -L1-
Component:Culvert-1
Cuivert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev< 202.35 ft Discharge 0.36 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 202.23 ft Tailwater Elevation 198.90 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 202.35 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 0.28
Grades
Upstream Invert 202.00 ft Downstream Invert 198.00 ft
Length 28.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.142857 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeS1S2 Depth,Downstream 0.90 ft
Siope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.10 ft
Flow Regime N/A Critical Depth 0.23 ft
Velocity Downstream 0.38 ft/s Critical Slope 0.004614 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.012
SecG2urr�i�HDPE(Smooth Interior) Span 1.25 ft
Section Size 15 inch Rise 1.25 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outiet Controi HW Elev. 202.35 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.08 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.04 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 202.23 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Fuli 1.2 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cuilipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:20:45 QAf�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 1 - Sta. 14+60 -L1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 202.35 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 205.00 ft
Headwater E�evation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 205.00
100.00 205.00
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts�2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:20:45�(�entiey Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 1 - Sta. 14+60 -L1-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-15 inch Circular 9.23 cfs 205.00 ft 16.11 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant ElevatiorQ7j.00 cfs 205.00 ft N/A
Totai ---------------- 9.23 cfs 205.00 ft N/A
Titie:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts�2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:20:57 QA(�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Soiution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Cuivert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 1 - Sta. 14+60 -L1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev< 205.00 ft Discharge 9.23 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 205.00 ft Tailwater Elevation 198.90 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 204.57 ft Control Type Inlet Control
Headwater Depth/Height 2.40
Grades
Upstream Invert 202.00 ft Downstream Invert 198.00 ft
Length 28.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.142857 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth,Downstream 0.59 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.51 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 1.16 ft
Velocity Downstream 16.11 ft/s Critical Slope 0.015038 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.012
SeciBnrr�i�HDPE(Smooth Interior) Span 1.25 ft
Section Size 15 inch Rise 1.25 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 204.57 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.93 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.47 ft
Iniet Control Properties
Iniet Control HW Elev. 205.00 ft Fiow Control 5ubmerged
Iniet Type Square edge w/headwali Area Full 1.2 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc cuiverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:20:57 4.�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 1 - Sta. 14+60 -L1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 205.00 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft CrestElevation 205.00 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 205.00
100.00 205.00
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2(03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:20:57�l�entley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Cuivert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 2 - Sta. 24+30 -L1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 0.47 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 0.47 cfs Check Discharge 0.59 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 199.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-15 inch Circular 0.47 cfs 199.52 ft 0.57 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatioi0�.00 cfs 199.52 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 0.47 cfs 199.52 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project E�gineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:24:14�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 2 - Sta. 24+30 -L1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 199.52 ft Discharge 0.47 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 199.50 ft Tailwater Elevation 199.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 199.52 ft Control Type Outlet Controi
Headwater Depth/Height 0.41
Grades
Upstream Invert 199.00 ft Downstream Invert 198.70 ft
Length 28.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.010714 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S1 Depth,Downstream 0.80 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.22 ft
Fiow Regime Subcriticai Critical Depth 0.27 ft
Velocity Downstream 0.57 ft/s Critical Siope 0.004533 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coe�cient 0.012
SecGDorr��HDPE(Smooth Interior) Span 1.25 ft
Section Size 15 inch Rise 1.25 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Prope�ties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 199.52 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.02 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.01 ft
Iniet Control Properties
Iniet Control HW Elev. 199.50 ft Flow Controi Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 1.2 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts�2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 1124:14��entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 2 - Sta. 24+30 -L1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevafion 199.52 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 202.50 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 202.50
100.00 202.50
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:24:14�l�entiey Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 2 - Sta. 24+30 -L1-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-15 inch Circular 10.05 cfs 202.50 ft 8.35 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatior�j.00 cfs 202.50 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 10.05 cfs 202.50 ft N/A
Titie:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cuilipher
t:\...\culverts�2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CuivertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01)
11/21/11 11:24:22�(�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 2 - Sta. 24+30 -L1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev< 202.50 ft Discharge 10.05 cfs
inlet Control HW Elev. 202.50 ft Tailwater Elevation 199.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 202.06 ft Control Type Inlet Control
Headwater Depth/Height 2.80
Grades
Upstream Invert 199.00 ft Downstream Invert 198.70 ft
Length 28.00 ft Constructed Siope 0.010714 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile Depth, Downstream 1.19 ft
Slope Type Mild Normal Depth N/A ft
Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 1.19 ft
Velocity Downstream 8.35 ft/s Critical Slope 0.017853 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coe�cient 0.012
SecQmrrM�i�HDPE(Smooth Interior) Span 1.25 ft
Section Size 15 inch Rise 1.25 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 202.06 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.04 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.52 ft
iniet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 202.50 ft Flow Control Submerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Fuil 1.2 ft'
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Titie:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\cuiverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/11 11:24:22�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 2 - Sta. 24+30 -L1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 202.50 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 202.50 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 202.50
100.00 202.50
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
11/21/'I 1 11:24:22 4�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Computa#ion ; (Hydrau��c Ana�ys,s}
" By: CC Date: 6/4/2010
�
� ��� �STEwaRT Checked: BRC Date: 6/21/2010
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culvert 3
Location: -L1- Sta. 26+75
Drainage Area:
Sub-Area Area Imervious Area Pervious Area Cw CA
(acres) Acres C Acres C
1 10.970 1.010 0.900 9.960 0.500 0.537 5.889
Totals 10.970 5.889
7ime of Concentration:
Length Slope Manning's Travel Time
Elev. 1 Elev. 2
L (ft) s (ft/ft) n T(min.)
Sub-Area 1
Sheet Flow: 300 288 256 0.1067 0.24 16.59
Shallow Conc. Flow: 879 256 202 0.0614 Unpaved 3.66
Open Channel Flow: 110 202 199 0.0273 0.08 1.16
Time of Concentration = 21.41
1289
Dischar e:';
A= 10.970 acres C = 0.5368 T = 21.414469 min.
Recurrence Intervai Years)
2 5 10 25 50 100
Intensit , I in./hr. 3.47 4.12 4.59 5.30 5.85 6.40
Discharge, Q (cfs) 20.42 24.24 27.04 31.20 34.47 37.70

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 3 - Sta.26+75 -L1-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 27.04 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 27.04 cfs Check Discharge 31.20 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 199.25 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 27.05 cfs 202.03 ft 4.14 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatior6�.00 cfs 202.03 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 27.05 cfs 202.03 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:09�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 3 - Sta.26+75 -L1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 202.03 ft Discharge 27.05 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 201.69 ft Tailwater Elevation 199.25 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 202.03 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 0.72
Grades
Upstream Invert 199.50 ft Downstream Invert 197.00 ft
Length 40.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.062500 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeS1S2 Depth, Downstream 2.25 ft
Slope Type 5teep Normal Depth 0.78 ft
Flow Regime N/A Critical Depth 1.60 ft
Velocity Downstream 4.14 ft/s Critical Slope 0.003914 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 202.03 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.62 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.31 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 201.69 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type 5quare edge w/headwall Area Full 9.6 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:53:09�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Cuivert 3 - Sta.26+75 -L1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Eievation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 202.03 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 203.75 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 203.75
100.00 203.75
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:09�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 3 - Sta.26+75 -L1-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 63.73 cfs 203.75 ft 15.95 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant ElevatiorQ�00 cfs 203.75 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 63.73 cfs 203.75 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:18�Rf�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +�-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Cuivert 3 - Sta.26+75 -L1-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 203.75 ft Discharge 63.73 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 203.49 ft Tailwater Elevation 199.25 ft
Outlet Contro�HW Elev. 203.75 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 1.21
Grades
Upstream Invert 199.50 ft Downstream Invert 197.00 ft
Length 40.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.062500 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 1.52 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.20 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Criticai Depth 2.50 ft
Velocity Downstream 15.95 ft/s Critical Slope 0.005420 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 203.75 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.16 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.58 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 203.49 ft F�ow Control Transition
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 9.6 ftZ
K 0.00980 HD5 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:18��entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 3 - Sta.26+75 -L1-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 203.75 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 203.75 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 203.75
100.00 203.75
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:18�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Computation (Hydrau�ic Anatysis}
��'��� By: CC Date: 5/19/2010
` STEwART Checked: BRC Date: 5/28/2010
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culvert 4
Location: -L2- 21+70
Draina e Area•
Sub-Area Area Q10 from Chart
Hydraulic Contour C200.3
(acres) CFS
1 87.97
2
3
Totals 87.97 5.50 95.00
Dischar e:'
A= 87.97 acres HC= 5.50
Frequenc Factor
2 5 10 25 50 100
Frequenc Factor 0.65 0.75 1.00 1.35 1.85 2.15
Discharge, Q (cfs) 61.75 71.25 95.00 128.25 175.75 204.25

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 4 - Sta.21+70 -L2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 95.00 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 95.00 cfs Check Discharge 128.28 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 191.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2-42 inch Circular 95.02 cfs 193.02 ft 6.46 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatioifl}00 cfs 193.02 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 95.02 cfs 193.02 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:29 QQt�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Cuivert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 4 - Sta.21+70 -L2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 193.02 ft Discharge 95.02 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 192.77 ft Tailwater Elevation 191.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 193.02 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 1.01
Grades
Upstream Invert 189.50 ft Downstream Invert 189.00 ft
Length 32.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.015625 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeS1S2 Depth, Downstream 2.50 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.49 ft
Flow Regime N/A Critical Depth 2.15 ft
Velocity Downstream 6.46 fbs Critical Slope 0.004587 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 2
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 193.02 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.91 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.46 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 192.77 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 19.2 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:29�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Cuivert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 4 - Sta.21+70 -L2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 193.02 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 193.80 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 193.80
100.00 193.80
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:53:29 Q��entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +�-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 4 - Sta.21+70 -L2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2-42 inch Circular 129.71 cfs 193.80 ft 11.02 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant ElevatiorG�j.00 cfs 193.80 ft N/A
Totai ---------------- 129.69 cfs 193.80 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:37 4�4f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Cuivert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 4 - Sta.21+70 -L2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 193.80 ft Discharge 129.71 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 193.64 ft Tailwater Eievation 191.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 193.80 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 1.23
Grades
Upstream Invert 189.50 ft Downstream Invert 189.00 ft
Length 32.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.015625 ft!ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 2.06 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.78 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 2.52 ft
Velocity Downstream 11.02 ft/s Critical Slope 0.005491 fUft
S ecti on
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 2
Outiet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 193.80 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.18 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.59 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 193.64 ft Flow Control Transition
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 19.2 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:37�t�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-'1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 4 - Sta.21+70 -L2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 193.80 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft CrestElevation 193.80 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 193.80
100.00 193.80
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:53:37 4�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culverfi Computation ; {Hydrau�;c Anatys:s}
� By: CC Date: 5/19/2010
Checked: BRC Date: 5/28/2010
STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culvert 5
Location: -L2- 32+75
Drainage Area:
Area Imervious Area Pervious Area
Sub-Area �acres) Acres C Acres C Cw CA
1 11.070 0.000 0.900 11.070 0.500 0.500 5.535
Totals 11 A70 5.535
Time o#Concen#ration: :
Length Slope Manning's Travel Time
Elev. 1 Elev. 2
L (ft) s (ft/ft) n T (min.)
Sub-Area 1
Sheet Flow: 300 246 238 0.0267 0.24 28.88
Shallow Conc. Flow: 525 238 196 0.0800 Unpaved 1.92
Open Channel Flow: 118 196 190 0.0508 0.08 0.97
Time of Concentration = 31.76
943
Dischar e.
A= 11.070 acres C = 0.5000 T = 31.763235 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years
2 5 10 25 50 100
Intensit , I (in./hr. 2.64 3.21 3.63 4.23 4.70 5.18
Discharge, Q (cfs) 14.62 17.78 20.11 23.43 26.04 28.65

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 5 - Sta.32+75 -L2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 20.11 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 20.11 cfs Check Discharge 23.43 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 189.05 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-30 inch Circular 10.93 cfs 192.74 ft 13.46 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatior9�.26 cfs 192.74 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 20.18 cfs 192.74 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:53:50 9�I�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 5 - Sta.32+75 -L2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev< 192.74 ft Discharge 10.93 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 192.46 ft Tailwater Elevation 189.05 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 192.74 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 0.70
Grades
Upstream Invert 191.00 ft Downstream Invert 188.00 ft
Length 32.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.093750 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 0.56 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.50 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 1.11 ft
Velocity Downstream 13.46 ft/s Critical Slope 0.004340 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 2.50 ft
Section Size 30 inch Rise 2.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 192.74 ft Upstream Veiocity Head 0.42 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.21 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 192.46 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 4.9 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01)
08/23/11 11:53:50�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 5 - Sta.32+75 -L2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 9.26 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 192.74 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coe�cient 2.93 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 192.64 ft
Headwater Elevation 192.74 ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.93
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Eiev.(ft)
0.00 192.64
100.00 192.64
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:50�t�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 5 - Sta.32+75 -L2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-30 inch Circular 9.83 cfs 192.64 ft 5.02 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatior6l�00 cfs 192.64 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 9.83 cfs 192.64 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:594�t�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 5 - Sta.32+75 -L2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 192.64 ft Discharge 9.83 cts
Inlet Control HW Elev. 192.36 ft Tailwater Elevation 189.05 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 192.64 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 0.66
Grades
Upstream Invert 191.00 ft Downstream Invert 188.00 ft
Length 32.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.093750 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeS1S2 Depth, Downstream 1.05 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.47 ft
Flow Regime N/A Critical Depth 1.05 ft
Velocity Downstream 5.02 ft/s Critical Siope 0.004278 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 2.50 ft
Section Size 30 inch Rise 2.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 192.64 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.40 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance l.oss 0.20 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 192.36 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 4.9 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:53:59 Q�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 5 - Sta.32+75 -L2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 192.64 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft OveRopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 192.64 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 192.64
100.00 192.64
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01)
08/23/11 11:53:59�t�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culverk Computation (Mydrau��c Anatysis}
� �"���' By: CC Date: 5/19/2010
'� Checked: BRC Date: 5/28/2010
STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culvert 6
Location: -L2-38+50
Drainage Area;
Sub-Area Area Imervious Area Pervious Area Cw CA
(acres) Acres C Acres C
1 39.750 0.000 0.900 39.750 0.500 0.500 19.875
Totals 39.750 19.875
Time of Concentration:'
Length Slope Manning's Travel Time
Elev. 1 Elev. 2
L (ft) s (ft/ft) n T(min.)
Sub-Area 1
Sheet Flow: 300 305 292 0.0433 0.24 23.78
Shallow Conc. Flow: 3099 292 194 0.0316 Unpaved 18.00
Open Channel Flow: 420 194 187 0.0167 0.08 3.95
Time of Concentration = 45.73
3819
Dischar e:
A= 39.750 acres C = 0.5000 T = 45.732827 min.
Recurrence Interval Years)
2 5 10 25 50 100
Intensit , I (in./hr.) 2.18 2.67 3.03 3.54 3.95 4.35
Discharge, Q(cfs) 43.24 53.10 60.19 70.43 78.41 86.39

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 6 - Sta. 38+50 -L2-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 60.19 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 60.19 cfs Check Discharge 70.43 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 194.35 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2-42 inch Circular 0.00 cfs 194.35 ft 0.00 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatic�40 cfs 194.35 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 44.40 cfs 194.35 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:10 Q�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +�-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 6 - Sta. 38+50 -L2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� N/A ft Discharge 0.00 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Tailwater Elevation 194.35 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Control Type Inlet Control
Headwater Depth/Height 3.01
Grades
Upstream Invert 183.80 ft Downstream Invert 183.40 ft
Length 44.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.009091 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile Dry Depth, Downstream 0.00 ft
Slope Type Dry Normal Depth 0.00 ft
F�ow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 0.00 ft
Velocity Downstream 0.00 ft/s Critical Slope 0.000000 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.012
SecGtarrr�t}�i�IHDPE(Smooth Interior) Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 2
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.00 ft
Ke 0.20 Entrance Loss 0.03 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Beveled ring,33.7°bevels Area Full 19.2 ft2
K 0.00180 HDS 5 Chart 3
M 2.50000 HDS 5 Scale B
C 0.02430 Equation Form 1
Y 0.83000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:10�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 6 - Sta. 38+50 -L2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 44.40 cfs Ailowable HW Elevation 194.35 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 0.01 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 188.90 ft
Headwater Elevation 194.35 ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 3.09
Submergence Factor(Kt) 0.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 188.90
100.00 188.90
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01)
08/23/11 11:54:10�(�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 6 - Sta. 38+50 -L2-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2-42 inch Circular 0.00 cfs 183.80 ft 0.00 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant ElevatiorG�00 cfs 183.80 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 0.01 cfs 183.80 ft N/A
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:54:17 QRl�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 6 - Sta. 38+50 -L2-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� N/A ft Discharge 0.00 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Tailwater Elevation 194.35 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Control Type inlet Control
Headwater Depth/Height 3.01
G rades
Upstream Invert 183.80 ft Downstream Invert 183.40 ft
Length 44.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.009091 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile Dry Depth, Downstream 0.00 ft
Slope Type Dry Normal Depth 0.00 ft
Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 0.00 ft
Velocity Downstream 0.00 ft/s Critical Slope 0.000000 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.012
SecGT�rr�i�HDPE(Smooth Interior) Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 2
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.00 ft
Ke 0.20 Entrance Loss 0.00 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. N/A ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Beveled ring,33.7°bevels Area Full 19.2 ft�
K 0.00180 HDS 5 Chart 3
M 2.50000 HDS 5 Scale B
C 0.02430 Equation Form 1
Y 0.83000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:17�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +�-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 6 - Sta. 38+50 -L2-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 183.80 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 0.02 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 188.90 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 3.09
Submergence Factor(Kt) 0.01
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 188.90
100.00 188.90
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:17�I�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Computation ', (Hyarau�,c Ana�ys;s)
By: CC Date: 5/19/2010
'� Checked: BRC Date: 5/28/2010
� STEWART
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culvert 7
Location: -WB-10+10.00
Drainage Area:
Area Imervious Area Pervious Area
Sub-Area �acres) Acres C Acres C Cw CA
1 52.100 3.950 0.900 48.150 0.500 0.530 27.630
Totals 52.100 ' 27.630
Time o#Concentration; '
Length Slope Manning's Travel Time
L (ft) Elev. 1 Elev. 2 s (ft/ft) n T (min.)
Sub-Area 1
Sheet Flow: 300 292 277 0.0500 0.24 22.46
Shallow Conc. Flow: 2068 277 220 0.0276 Unpaved 12.87
Open Channel Flow: 1489 220 190 0.0201 0.08 9.73
Time of Concentration = 45.06
3857
Dischar e:
A= 52.100 acres C = 0.5303 T = 45.055013 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2 5 10 25 50 100
Intensity, I in./hr.) 2.20 2.70 3.06 3.58 3.98 4.39
Discharge, Q (cfs) 60.74 74.54 84.48 98.84 110.02 121.21

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 7 - Sta. 10+10 -WB-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 84.48 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 84.48 cfs Check Discharge 98.84 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 189.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2-42 inch Circular 84.49 cfs 190.78 ft 5.75 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatior�j.00 cfs 190.78 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 84.49 cfs 190.78 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:29 Q�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 7 - Sta. 10+10 -WB-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev< 190.78 ft Discharge 84.49 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 190.53 ft Tailwater Elevation 189.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 190.78 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 0.94
Grades
Upstream Invert 187.50 ft Downstream Invert 187.00 ft
Length 64.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.007813 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profiie CompositeS1S2 Depth, Downstream 2.50 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.70 ft
Flow Regime N/A Critical Depth 2.02 ft
Velocity Downstream 5.75 ft/s Critical Siope 0.004378 fUft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 2
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 190.78 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.83 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.42 ft
Inlet Control Properties
inlet Control HW Elev. 190.53 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 19.2 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title:Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:29�(�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Cuivert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 7 - Sta. 10+10 -WB-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s): Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 190.78 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 192.00 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 192.00
100.00 192.00
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:29�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 7 - Sta. 10+10 -WB-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 2-42 inch Circular 138.54 cfs 192.00 ft 10.01 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatio�j.00 cfs 192.00 ft N/A
` Total ---------------- 138.55 cfs 192.00 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:37�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 7 - Sta. 10+10 -WB-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 192.00 ft Discharge 138.54 cfs
inlet Control HW Elev. 191.90 ft Tailwater Elevation 189.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 192.00 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 1.29
Grades
Upstream Invert 187.50 ft Downstream Invert 187.00 ft
Length 64.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.007813 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 2.36 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 2.32 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 2.61 ft
Velocity Downstream 10.01 ft/s Critical Slope 0.005786 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 2
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Efev. 192.00 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.26 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.63 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 191.90 ft Flow Control Transition
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 19.2 ft�
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:54:37 Q�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 7 - Sta. 10+10 -WB-
; Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 192.00 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 192.00 ft
Neadwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 192.00
100.00 192.00
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:37�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Computation ' �t�ydrau�ic Ana�ys;s)
�'` By: CC Date: 5/19/2010
" sTEwaRT Checked: BRC Date: 5/28/2010
Project: Lower Neuse Greenway
Job Number: H9001.00
Description: Culvert 8
Location: -WB- 106+35
Drainage Area:
Area Imervious Area Pervious Area
Sub-Area �acres) Acres C Acres C Cw CA
1 49.090 5.850 0.900 43.240 0.500 0.548 26.885
Totals 49.090 26.885
Time of Cancentration.
Length Slope Manning's Travel Time
L(ft) Elev. 1 Elev. 2 s (ft/ft) n T (min.)
Sub-Area 1
Sheet Flow: 300 217 214 0.0100 0.24 42.75
Shallow Conc. Flow: 2335 194 174 0.0086 Unpaved 26.06
Open Channel Flow: 565 174 165 0.0159 0.08 5.05
Time of Concentration = 73.87
3200
Dischar e:
A= 49.090 acres C = 0.5477 T = 73.865214 min.
Recurrence Interval (Years)
2 5 10 25 50 100
Intensity, I in./hr. 1.53 1.91 2.17 2.56 2.86 3.15
Discharge, Q (cfs) 41.04 51.28 58.33 68.77 76.78 84.78

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 8 - Sta.106+35 -WB-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 58.33 cfs
Peak Discharge Method:User-Specified
Design Discharge 58.33 cfs Check Discharge 68.77 cfs
Tailwater Conditions:Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation 164.50 ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev, Veiocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 47.37 cfs 168.51 ft 15.30 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant ElevatiQr9}03 cfs 168.51 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 58.40 cfs 168.51 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:48 iSf�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Cuivert 8 - Sta.106+35 -WB-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev� 168.51 ft Discharge 47.37 cfs
Inlet Controi HW Elev. 168.17 ft Tailwater Elevation 164.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 168.51 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 1.00
Grades
Upstream Invert 165.00 ft Downstream Invert 162.50 ft
Length 36.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.069444 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 1.25 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.00 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 2.15 ft
Velocity Downstream 15.30 ft/s Critical Slope 0.004580 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 168.51 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.91 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.45 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Controi HW Elev. 168.17 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwali Area Full 9.6 ftz
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2(03.02.00.01J
08/23/11 11:54:48 2Rt�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 8 - Sta.106+35 -WB-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 11.03 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 168.51 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.94 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 168.40 ft
Headwater Elevation 168.51 ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.94
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 168.40
100.00 168.40
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
O8/23/11 11:54:48 Q�l�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaYertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 3 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 8 - Sta.106+35 -WB-
Overtopping Analysis
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 44.93 cfs 168.40 ft 15.16 ft/s
Weir Roadway(Constant Elevatio�lj 00 cfs 168.40 ft N/A
Total ---------------- 44.93 cfs 168.40 ft N/A
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:56 2Af�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +�-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Culvert 8 - Sta.106+35 -WB-
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev< 168.40 ft Discharge 44.93 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 168.06 ft Tailwater Elevation 164.50 ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 168.40 ft Control Type Entrance Control
Headwater Depth/Height 0.97
G rades
Upstream Invert 165.00 ft Downstream Invert 162.50 ft
Length 36.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.069444 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 1.21 ft
Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.97 ft
Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 2.09 ft
Velocity Downstream 15.16 ft/s Critical Slope 0.004480 ft/ft
S ecti on
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Ouflef Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev. 168.40 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.87 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.44 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 168.06 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 9.6 ft�
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
Y 0.67000
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer: Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:56�I�ent�ey Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 3

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Cuivert 8 - Sta.106+35 -WB-
Component:Weir
Hydraulic Component(s):Roadway(Constant Elevation)
Discharge 0.00 cfs Allowable HW Elevation 168.40 ft
Roadway Width 18.00 ft Overtopping Coefficient 2.90 US
Length 100.00 ft Crest Elevation 168.40 ft
Headwater Elevation N/A ft Discharge Coefficient(Cr) 2.90
Submergence Factor(Kt) 1.00
Sta(ft) Elev.(ft)
0.00 168.40
100.00 168.40
Title: Neuse River GreenWay Project Engineer:Chase Cullipher
t:\...\culverts\2010.06.07 wc culverts.cvm Stewart Engineering CulvertMaster v3.2[03.02.00.01]
08/23/11 11:54:56�f�entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +�-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 3

���// � ��� ��
� \
� ��
� � �; \
� � � � /� `�
__'_/ �,/ 1\
E // `
, /��� � ��
/ ' � /
�� � � \ /
� � �\ i
� � � � � ;
� � Oo08 AC � ► ` _
, � � ' —
$r,--_ ._ _-�����/ � ► i =
, % �iiii�r��� „ ,
��� ` \� � i �
� - � � �/ i �
��_ ^ �� \ � � �
� � � , // ,�-'� �
/ � �' �
�/ � � � �oIO �IC �� ,' �
� ��� , ; ►
� � 1Oo97 AC '
,
� - �t� ��i��� �� �' I
= v ► � I
� � _ ,� o ; II ' �
�� � ► � � I
� r i � /�
�� �I �� __ '
__ � �
�- ,1�
� � �= �—__�.__� -_ ._—,� ,
,
D � ��� `� ,�
� � /
� � � �
o � � �\\ ��
�
e �
� �
� ��\�\ ° o � � �
, � �
� � �
� �
�o � � o �
�
��
� o
�
�� \\ ��� a � ��

� � �� � \ �� �/ __ �'�--�
� ��' �� ,
� �. �
o i ► �
/ J ` �
�
� ` I
� � `� 1
/ // � � \
� „/ �/ � , 1 \
O �� � � \ �
� — -- ,
�' �� � \ I
� � � �
i % � I
� .�
i �
) , � �_�i � � � '
\
� � , � �
� \ ,
� , � \
� / � \ ��
/ � -� � �
/ � ' ' �
/ : � � l
� � / /C� � % \ ► � i
�` ; �\ ; ; i
� � \ �, /� I
1 � / \ / I
�
� �� '
�� � � �
� .'"�� ----'��/ ���, �
� \ // /�--J�---�'��/ /r��//' ,�' I
/ '1 �
� � ,,_�i��� � ��/ \
// �/ '� � � �
_� � � / ' ��' i, �, � � �
� � � � / ; 87.97 ac � �'� I )
i � � �
� (
�� ,�' / �� ; �
� .---'� i �� � '� ' 1
� ' � �:��;�`� �� � ► ;� �
....�� � ,-'�I /� ; �� � — �
o � � � �i , , �� �� \
> , , �,
� � � �
�� ; � � , �� � � �� �
,��� � � �� � � / ���
� /
� � 1 /1.07 ac� / 39.7� ac ;52.1 AC l
O i ,, , ; , �
, , � �
, ,� ,� ;� � ; � �
, � i - � �� �
� � � , � �
� � -'� i� � � 1
�� ° � ..-' �� ���� � � � � � �
�• ��� / � � I � �
0 F ; � � � ; I �
� ��� � ; , � i
� ►
, � � � � �
� � ����'� � ����� % i
O �� ° ��� ��I ��� � � � I
` ��� - I � ► \\ %
� � �
� � �
�.� � � � � l
� � � � �� � �
� , � � �
� � � � �
I a ` �
o a � �� ,, � ,
� o O � � ; i '� o
�` �- ' �
� � ���-.�� ,�
�
� �
0 � �
� � � _ � � �^ � �

� � � �
O
0
,�
O �
E'� �
j I 1
/ �
� �
,�O �
♦ �
0, �
I i �
I 1
��, �
I���� �
s �
�� �
� i 1
� � ��� �
1
O ;s � '
� , ,
� ;
' ' �
� , �\� Y 1
I p
i I �
I �
I �
� �� 1
� ` � o/ / 1
1 �
�� �
7 �
' D
� ; �
� � ��� �
� ��d ,�` �
� ; .� � �
� � �
�� �� '
�,
� � %� �
� � �
; ; i
I ; ;
� 'f ` �
= I i
� � D
, , ,
� ,
� / I � '
, �
�,s� / i �
� � � � /
; � / ;� �
� 0
, ,
\ ; / �!
I I
( � � ! �
� i � �
� ' i
\ � \ i
/ \
� _ _ � i _�
� , �� � � � I\ � � 1 , �
�
�
� � i i
\ � i i 1` �
�� � - - _
\ ' i � .� `
� � /!
" . • g � � =� .
� ' �
. a��,� � � � ..�
.,� ,s � f—
'� ( � � �,°'r I `� �///// � .�
l •� ' �a•,��� �„ I � .
Q '" "� �� -�;�� ._ � ..
� _ ' � ' � � , .. - Q
. .. >.���� � //�._ ' ._ ��` �� _ ._
� I �i��j ��� �.-� .
� _ .__� � . __.o�- ._ s� :�� ��� ',- ���,` -�
��� . �• ����_ � , ' �� � � �� .. -—
._ � �� ':��=�,a- _� � ._ ��
0 r .... .` .` • _ .i fs ' . ' � �
/ �° � �
\ — '_ '— ``_'� ', JG� � ... � •.. f y ��
\�
� "_- .. r �''y �-/ r�
� � � f ✓ �J
o a
� � 0
� a � O
O
� O
� � � �� �

�� �
��
� ��
t �
� ��
� .
� �.
I !� ��
� �.
t ��
� � �� �
I �.
I ���
I �
I �
I �
� � 1
� �
' \ ```�♦
1
� \ ♦
� �♦
1 ��r
1 ��y
� �
1 `�`
I ,
I `
I �
I �
I �
/ � ♦
I `
1 �
1 �
1 ♦
1 � �`
1 `
1 �
1 �
1 �
1 �
1 �
7 � �
1 9
1 ♦
! / ♦
� \ ♦
1 �
♦
1 �� 1
� I 1
1 �
1 \ �
� � I
\ i �
1 �
1 �
' / /
I �
I �
�j 1
� �!
I � �i
j o�
1 � �
� � �, �
_ / ���
1 '" � ♦�
1 � `
1 I
i �
1 �
1 �
� r
i �
i �
� � i
i �
i �
� � �
�� ����� � , � �
� � � �� �
� � .
Q � ' �
� .,, -� .., � ♦� � !
� /r °� � ���` \ I
� �, \ ♦
• �- `'�` I
� \ ��`` ;♦
/
_ � �° � � � � ���` �
I � � �� i
( .� - ��' � �� i
♦ �
� � '_ - \ � �
\ ., ' �� �
.� � ._ • �, �„ � �
��� � , � �
` �
� .Y � /� `
.Y �~ ` `
�\ , `
.� � � � ��q� �
�
� ♦ �w�
> � � ..�
� ... • � �y 0 ♦ �
�"'4"' ��` "�'�'���" ��je�
.y \\\\\ ', `V:y' 4\ A - '�
4 � � "�� � � n �_
� �3� � � ��� � .
\/ p � ��., �.,�.me�..�..,m.e � � .
' � _ �, ` -
� �� `��.�✓
� � � � � � � •� � � ���'�.-bl ;�� ��
��� � � ._ e� _�, � � � �� ,,
. . . . ._
. _ a_ . _ ._ . J . .
.� . O ` ..Y. . . 6 - . '
° r �
�' . p •r � � .� •W
� W
,� . �� ,
♦ •� . ,� � r ,� � '• .
� '-�. �.. ` i. - �,�-' _ _
� W � �
i ./� / �tqT q,. r Y I 'r� r � .\ \
� �4' t,
� � � �� �
�� •r
O r �� '
f �- �,.:- �� .r
\
/
� r� `i� � _ � /� �� �\ ,� , /

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 1-Sta 14+50 L1
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.11 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.03 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.08 Ac
C�„m 0.59
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.47 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.043 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.04
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 2.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.04
V = 6.71 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.50 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 2.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width 9.020201 ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5O33F)F)H Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 2-Sta 20+75 L1
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.12 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.03 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.09 Ac
C�„m 0.58
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.50 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.024 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.06
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 1.5 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.06
V = 5.01 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.38 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 1.5 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5 Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 3-Sta 15+25 L2
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.13 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.05 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.08 Ac
C�„m 0.64
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.60 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.060 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.05
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 3.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.05
V = 7.93 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.59 FT
Use 0.59 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 #/sq ft > 3.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) 1.594601451 ft � /
\
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 4-Sta 35+00 L2
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.21 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.04 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.17 Ac
C�„m 0.55
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.83 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.027 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.09
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 1.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.09
V = 5.32 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.40 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 1.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5 Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 5-Sta 53+25 L2
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.13 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.05 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.08 Ac
C�„m 0.64
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.60 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.060 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.05
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 3.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.05
V = 7.93 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.59 FT
Use 0.59 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 #/sq ft > 3.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) 1.594601451 ft � /
\
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 6-Sta 11+50 Y1
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.14 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.04 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.11 Ac
C�„m 0.58
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.58 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.031 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.06
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 1.9 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.06
V = 5.72 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.43 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 1.9 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5 Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 7-Y1 to WB
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 1.49 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.14 Ac
Cb = 0.45 1.35 Ac
C�„m 0.50
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 5.35 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.028 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.60
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 1.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.60
V = 5.42 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.41 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 1.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5 Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 8-Sta.53+00 WBR1
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.13 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.02 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.11 Ac
C�„m 0.53
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.49 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.027 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.06
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 1.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.06
V = 5.34 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.40 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 1.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5 Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 9-Sta.69+75 WB
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.20 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.04 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.16 Ac
C�„m 0.55
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.79 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.042 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.07
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 2.6 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.07
V = 6.63 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.50 FT
Use 0.50 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 2.6 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) �.5 Tt � /
�
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 10-Sta.104+00 WB
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.20 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.04 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.16 Ac
C�„m 0.55
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.80 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.050 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.07
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 3.1 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.07
V = 7.24 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.54 FT
Use 0.54 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: PSRM 3.20 #/sq ft > 3.1 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) 1.542794379 ft � /
\
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

S
STEWART
CHANNEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Walnut Creek Trail
DITCH: Ditch 11-Sta.136+00 WB
DATE: 07-Nov-11
REVISED:
10 YEAR CHANNEL FLOW DATA
AREA = 0.12 (Ac.)
Ca = 0.95 0.05 Ac
Cb = 0.45 0.07 Ac
C�„m 0.66
INTENSITY= 7.22 (in/hr)
FLOW = 0.57 (cfs)
DESIGN CRITERIA
CHANNEL LINING:
N = 0.028 (Mannings 'n')
SLOPE= 0.060 (ft/ft)
Z REQUID= 0.04
M = 3 :1 (sideslope)
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
DEPTH = 1.00 (ft)
WIDTH = 0 (ft)Bottom Width
TRACTIVE FORCE
T =Y*D*S Tractive Force (#/sq ft)
Y =WEIGHT OF WATER (62.4#/cf)
D =DEPTH OF FLOW IN CHANNEL(ft)
S =SLOPE OF CHANNEL(ftfft)
T = 3.7 (#/sq ft)
Maximum Allowable Tractive Force
L JUTE NET 0.45 (#/sq ft)
I CURLED MAT 1.55 (#/sq ft)
N PSRM 3.20 (#/sq ft)
I CLASS B RIPRAP 3.50 (#/sq ft)
N CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 (#/sq ft)
G CLASS II RIPRAP 7.50 (#/sq ft)
Z ACTUAL
AREA = 3.00 (sqfft)
WP = 6.32 (ft)
R = 0.47
Z ACTUAL= 1.82 MUST BE > THAN Z REQ'D. = 0.04
V = 7.93 (ft/sec) NOTE:DISCHARGES INTO PIPE
FREEBOARD DESIGN SECTION
Required Freeboard: F=0.075*V*d or 0.50 feet. Choose the larger of the two options
V=Velocity in fVs and d=depth of water in feet
F= 0.59 FT
Use 0.59 FT of Freeboard
CHANNEL DESIGN SECTION
LINING: CLASS I RIPRAP 5.00 #/sq ft > 3.7 #/sq ft
Top of Channel Width ft
(TOP OF CHANNEL DEPTH) 1.594601451 ft � /
\
(FLOW DEPTH) 1 ft \ /
\
0 ft
(BOTTOM WIDTH)

Worthdale Park to New Hope Road
Sheet 4
�
�
0
ti�
_ / �
, / / �o O
20 I I `ti�
Ditch 1
/
200 � �
�
\ �
/
�
�
�
�
�� ....... / �
�° �o / / /
� ;' �
-- i 91M — — � � � � /1��%':
;� �__
_ � ;%
� � - -a�M-
� ,
� - -
,
- .�� �------- --- �
��
,i
i
��
/
, ���-, j �94,�
`� `� � _
�..

O�
Ditch 2
Worthdale Park to
New Hope Road
Sheet 4 & 5 �
�
_� � �_
2�0
221� a
%� \�/
%
. �
� ,
�—,_, � �
�� \'
� �
��
� - ' �00
�
200 � O
O
�s
�s�
/ � �a�M — —
� — —
� / �
� � �
/ � / �
�
/ � � �
�� � �
� �
/ �

�
---- ----- ---- -------------
_,
Worthdale Park to New Hope Road "" �
Sheet 6
----- ---
-----------------
- - --- -
-- ---------------
__-
_ �
__-_- �
Ditch 3 °' /
\
�
o_
\ / � � —�°0�°
� �
� � i
, /
�
�> �
�
2ps ,
,
�
� ------
2p ___ '�
- ---
O - ;
i___-=
` , ,
�90 � i
�
�85 �
,
<-�--- %
_�1
' /
� � — / / �
_ � �
--- � /
�
/ �
�
r�
� �/ \
�� �
�\ � \ � � \

L�
�
Worthdale Park to New Hope Road
Sheet 8
Ditch 4 � � �
�
_ —
�� —
� o�/ � �
� �
�
�. / ' ��.. �
` -20
� '
/ � -
� � ��
/ `� �
�9� / � �
� �� � � � .
/ ..
/
�� � ��°
\�J �00
/
195
�
�9� � _ -
�
�
� -
�
�
i
�
�g1M -� �
1�h / i
� ^ � i �
� � � � i �
/ � � � � � � � � - -WLB � �
0 � � � Q � i
' / i
r �
i � - �
�
�� �
� �

� �
�
worthdale park to new hope road I
sheet 9 & 10
ditch 7 /
ti�
_ �
. /
_ / I
�
� �
� o
� °' I
� �
\ � � m
Q � o : � �
.�
ditch 5 � �
� ` II
� � / `s' �
1
/
� /, /
;. / � . � � �
_ / � ,
- i' r
, �
, �> � i
�
r
m
�-200 � �
�� � / J
_... �\ \ � /
205 � a / �
� � � \ � � - �
_ _, ,
� �
__ — �
a �
� � � ,,
��� ,
� o � � - - -e _ �
�
� ' � - - - — �
►
� � D
.
� � . �� � �

\
Worthdale Park to New Hope Road
Sheet 10
,
!
Cfl
� � 2��
� ....... .... ...... ...... 20o O —
—
------------------ ------
__ : �
-----
---------- ----- ------------------------ ----------------------------
------------- I
_
---------- ---- --- --
--- ----------
--- -------- - ---------------_ ---------------------------------�,`
< < < <�
---- -- - --- _
- ------
oD - ----- ----
-- ---
----,_,
'O°��� , �°�O ----
� 1 �
� �� I
\ �
� -----
�
o °
Ditch 6
�9S
�
�90
� �
�g�M'
� \ '�s
I �
� '�o
I �
I � �
I %^ � �'S
i \> i . � � ��

New Hope Road to the Neuse River
Sheet 6
\
�
\
\
\
� �
�
� . .
\ Ditch 8
� \�
, \ �
� � �,
� � ,
, \
� � � � � �
� � ,` — \ _. / —�
�a �� . � \/ �
�- ,�4� �
�x , �
I \\
� � ��
� � �
` � �
` x iW�g/ , /_X X ��4 — `�
�� ` ' �MN
�. � k ,
� � / , ��
% , � x
o � �X_x ���
, / �—X
/ k '�
_ / � »o � - - - � .
� � , k >> �
\ � � � �S i
\ � ��M�
� �� �
�
� �
� / — i
� \ \, � � � i
�
/ I�-'--- -.
.' ._.
�- ��. .� _.
� '�_ ���,�..__ --�--__/� X ��---� �
�i�� '66 S ----
� —� �� �
, , �� � �67a k ,.. �._ �

\
� �
� \ New Hope Road to the Neuse Rlver
Sheet 8
�MH
\
+�X �
� ,�O
� +
�� � + Ditch 9 � ��
/
� \� v-7 / �
,
� � ie) � �
� � � x + �
� \ ,ao � '
� + a � / �
� + /
� � ��5 / �
�� � � � /�
.\
� X i s�.� -�- � � + � �
.\ \ \ / _
.� \ � /� � ' - - -
� � x 164.5
\ � � \k� ��
� � X - - - - - �
�� g� i
.\ ) �
�� i
.\ � �
� ,� x ts3.
� � � �
,` \ � x 164.1
x 164.8 X 164.2 � � �
�� � � i
.\
.\
�'�,\ x 164.5 � \
\ � �
x 164J \ �'� X 164.4 x 164\4�
� \ �� V�, � .

—
\
�bo� �\\\\\
� 1
New Hope Road to the Neuse River 6$6
Sheet 10 Ditch 10 X � �
�O
, \
. /
�
x X x -a:
< < X/X
< ` /
X �X
x x x X X X X X�k��X�X k\X-X�X X X X X X X X -X
0
GJ
� �62 6 � �60
1
X �6��` � �,� 6�� ,
� `\
� �� ���
� �6�• �\ '� �
�- —
� •�
•� �
'�---- 165
� \�_ f �,
�6,� 6 � � � �� \ \ �' ��
� ` \�\ �� \--
X �6� 6 ��\,� �, ��� •�
-,� W .
,�� ,�5g� �� �
X �6 '�-� � '� _ _ �
--' '�
�� '�- i -
.� �61�\ \
�r� \ � �� \
� � � �
� M� � �
� v \
\ �' � � � � , 1 ��\
� /\ � � ��°� `Z� �;�

� � -� � � � � ��Ibl� 4 �
� � � �
� j � I
X159.6
—165 --- �
� --- --- --- ��--- I
�� „ , / � ---
/1 � i �
CR��n i i �
_' TATAT I�TTlT I I
�-� � » _ _ �— �
— I I
//�--
i 165 v \
New Hope Road to the Neuse River
� Sheet 13 I161 .5 ... I I ,
x 167.7 �
� _ x 165.6 I I �
� ��
-- ` �
' � I ��
� � 16�� � �
� � x 1 � .3 ►
I
�1 .4 � �
Ditch 11 � � 0
��— — — — — - _ �
�
— — �—
o ___�_
- _ — — _ _ — �� I I X168.2 `��
— _ _ � � I
��� � 1 �
i �
i ,
X 165.2 x 164.7 � �� 1�2. '�
,
�`
�� � � X167.2 ,
'�'s � I �
1
x 163. � I �
� � I
� � \
� �_ � � �

�@���r�vo���r��� �Yll�� St���S � ��� � t Of� � � ���1��°
. �
�i " o FIS�-i AIVI�WI�,DL�FE S�RVICE
� �
Raleigh Field Office
� Post Offce�ox 33726
�'4��� '��� Raleigh,North Carolina 27636-3726
27 I�ecember 2010
Iona L. Thomas,AICP
Stewart Engineering,Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27601
Re: Neuse River Trail Project—Johnston/Wake County line to Anderson Point segment;VValnut Creek
s��e?�t; rrabtree C�reek seQanent,Wake County,IVorth Carolina
Dear Ms.Thomas.
This letter provides the US Fish and Wildlife Service's(Service)response to your December l,2010 requests
for comments on the Johnston/Wake County line to Anderson Point segment,Walnut Creek segment,and
Crabtree Creek segment of the Neuse River Trail Project in Wake County,North Carolina. Our comments are
submitted in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(48 Stat.401,as amended;
16 U.S.C. 661-667d)and the Endangered Species Act of 1973,as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The proposed project involves construction of approximately 9.8 miles of new greenway consisting of a 10-
foot wide paved trail, 13 sections of new boardwalk,and 11 pedestrian bridges over low areas and unnamed
tributaries,one pedestrian bridge over the Neuse River,one pedestrian bridge over Walnut Creek,and one
pedestrian bridge over Crabtree Creek. Construction of tlie trail will involve clearing and grubbing,grading,
placement of subgrade material and asphalt paving. The bridges over the Neuse River,Walnut Creek and
Crabtree Creek will be constructed on 5.5-foot diameter piers with boardwalk and graded approaches,as
appropriate,and will not require any in-stream construction.
There is an historical record of the federally endangered Dwarf wedgemussel(Alasmidonta heterodon)near
the confluence of the Neuse River and Crabtree Creek, and the natural resources investigation documented that
potentially suitable habitat exists for the Dwarf wedgemussel in the Neuse River,possibly where the crossings
are proposed. However, since the project will have no direct stream impacts (i.e.,no in-stream construction),
the Service could concur with a"not likely to adversely affect"determination for the Dwarf wedgemussel.
In addition,as mentioned in previous correspondence(Skycrest to Horseshoe segment, 06 Oct 2010),the
Service would like to see the NC Wildlife Resources Commission's recommendations for porous pavement,
maintaining buffers, avoiding impacts to streams and wetlands,and installing sediment and erosion control
measures prior to land clearing or construction to be followed. These efforts will help to minimize impacts to
aquatic and terrestrial resources.
Thank you far your cooperation with our agency in protecting federally-listed species. If you have any
questions or comments,please feel free to contact Sarah McRae at(919) 856-4520x16.
, Sincerely, ;
. �, =����: �-�it;tc��'-- -
/`,,,,. Pete Benjamin
C��� Field Supervisor

�������
� ��
�,� � �
°���.:�
North Carolina epart�aent of C�lt�ral esources
State I�i�toric Preservat�ot� Of�ce
Peter B.Sandbeck,Adininistrator
Bevexly Eaves Perdue,Governor Office of Axchives and History
Linda A.Carlisle,Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffxey J.Cxow,Depury Secretary David Brook,Directox
January 27, 2011
1Vlichael Taylor
Stewart Engineering
421 Fay�tteville Street
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Environmental Report, Neuse RiveY Trail,Wake County, ER 09-0167
Dear Mr. Taylor:
Thank you for your transmittal of the environmental repoYt by ESI, Inc. dated December 3,2010,in
connection with the Neuse River Trail. We apologize for the delay in our response.
The environmental report includes a preliininaiy cultural and archaeological resource assessment based on
informarion in our files and some of our earlier correspondence with ESI, Inc. concerning the Neuse River
Greenway. No actual field survey was conducted for archaeological resources. The�eport would have been
much more useful if it had contained a map indicating the locations of the proposed greenway and the features
discussed.
Contrary to a statement in the report, documentation on archaeological sites 31WA1359 and 31WA1360 is not
incomplete. Data Yecovery excavations were completed at both of these sites in connection with the North
Carolina Department of Transportation Knightdale Bypass project. Copies of the resulting xeports are on file
at the Office of State Archaeology. As the environmental report was written in February 2010,it does not
include our comments of July 27, 2010,requesting information YegaYding the size of the pYOposed parking lots
and trailheads and a recommendation for archaeological survey and evaluation.
It would also be helpful to know the regulatory requirements for this project. If permits are required from the
US Army Corps of Engineers,have they defined the peYmit area and the area of potential effect (APE)? If
there is federal involvement, the project will be subject to Section 106 of the National Histoxic Preservation
Act. Please forward this information at your earliest convenience.
The above comments aYe made pursuant to Section 106 of the Narional Historic Preservation Act and the
above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR PaYt 800.
d.ocation:109 East Jones Stceet,Raleigh NC 27601 Ndailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, envitonmental review cooxdinator, at 919-807-6579. In all futuxe
communication conceYning this project,please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
����.�,� .� n�.��� �,��•.
Claudia Brown

�
�� �h x�
_ � � x�..
� � ���
� ��
� �
x ....
�: � � � . �� �
; � £.���
1 � ��� �
�::: � .: ` � � �
�
} .: :.... ..:::
� ,.... ,. :::.
x : °.
� ,
�� � , . .. x ..
� North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission �
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
10 December 2010
Ms. Iona L. Thomas,AICP
Stewart Engineering, Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27601
Subject: Neuse River Trail Project—Johnston/Walce County to Anderson Point Segment,Walnut
Creelc Segment, and Crabtree Creelc Segment,Walce County,North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
documents and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The City of Raleigh is requesting comments on three segments of the Neuse River Trail project—
Johnston/Walce County to Anderson Point Segment,Walnut Creelc Segment, and Crabtree Creelc
Segment.
Johnston/Walce County to Anderson Point Se�
The Johnston/Walce County to Anderson Point Segment includes construction of approximately
9.8 miles of new greenway consisting of 10-foot wide paved trail, 13 new sections of boardwall�, 11
pedestrian bridges over low areas and unnamed tributaries, and pedestrian bridges over Neuse River,
Walnut Creelc and Crabtree Creelc. Construction will involve clearing, grubbing, grading and placement
of subgrade material and asphalt paving. The bridge over Neuse River will be constructed on 5.5 foot
diameter piers with one boardwallc approach and one graded approach. No in-stream construction is
proposed for any of the bridge crossings.
The Neuse River supports a diverse aquatic community and spawning runs of bluebacic herring
(Alosa aestivalis),hicicory shad(Alosa mediocris), alewife(Alosa pseudoharengus),American shad
(Alosa sapidissima), and striped bass (Morone sa�atilis). There are records for the federal species of
concern and state endangered green floater(Lasmigona subviYidis), and the state threatened Roanolce
slabshell(Elliptio roanokensis),triangle floater(Alasmidonta undulata), creeper(Strophitus undulatus)
and yellow lampmussel(Lampsilis radiata)in Neuse River. Also,the Significant Natural Heritage Area
—Neuse River(Clayton)Forests—is located within the project boundaries.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh,NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
10 December 2010
Neuse River Trail Project
Walnut Creelc Segment
The Walnut Creelc Segment includes construction of approximately 3.8 miles of new greenway
consisting of 10-foot wide paved trail, 5 new sections of boardwallc, and a pedestrian bridge over Walnut
Creelc. Construction will involve clearing,grubbing,grading and placement of subgrade material and
asphalt paving. The bridge over Walnut Creelc will be constructed on 5.5 foot diameter piers with
boardwallc approaches or a graded approach. No in-stream construction is proposed for any of the bridge
crossings.
There are records for the federal species of concern and state significantly rare pinewoods shiner
(Lythrurus matutinus) and Roanolce bass (Ambloplites cavifYOns)in Walnut Creelc. A portion of the
Significant Natural Heritage Area—Walnut Creek Bottomland Forests—is located within the proj ect
boundaries.
Crabtree Creelc Segment
The Crabtree Creelc Segment includes construction of approximately 3.9 miles of new greenway
consisting of 10-foot wide paved trail, 6 new sections of boardwallc, a pedestrian bridge over an unnamed
tributary, and three pedestrian bridges over Crabtree Creelc. Construction will involve clearing, grubbing,
grading and placement of subgrade material and asphalt paving. The bridges over Crabtree Creelc will be
constructed on 5.5 foot diameter piers with boardwallc approaches or a graded approach. No in-stream
construction is proposed for any of the bridge crossings.
There are records for the state special concern North Carolina spiny crayfish(Orconectes
[Procericambarus] carolinensis)in Crabtree Creelc. A portion of the Significant Natural Heritage Area—
Crabtree Creek Aquatic Habitat—is located within the proj ect boundaries.
We offer the following comments or recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and
terrestrial wildlife resources.
1. Porous pavement materials are preferred over asphalt. Porous pavement would facilitate
infiltration of stormwater as opposed to the direct runoff produced from asphalt.
2. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a
50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers
along these areas will reduce impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources,water quality,
and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the proj ect area. In addition, these buffers will
provide an adequate travel corridor for wildlife species, and may increase opportunities for
observation of a greater diversity of wildlife.
3. Streams and wetland areas should be avoided where possible. We are pleased the project will use
boardwallc in wetland areas and recommend the use of bridges,rather than culverts, for stream
crossings. If culverts must be used for stream crossings, these should be designed to allow
passage of aquatic organisms.
4. As detailed in the document,Neuse River below Milburnie dam is designated as Inland Primary
Nursery Area and an in-water worlc moratorium applies between February 15 and September 30.
5. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained. Excessive
silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including
destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species.

Page 3
10 December 2010
Neuse River Trail Project
Thanlc you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further assistance,
please contact our office at(336)449-7625.
Sincerely,
..��`�n�.��
Shari L. Bryant
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program