20061203 Ver 3_Modifications_20110927

Mcmillan, Ian
From: Belk, Christopher [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:18 PM
To: Henry Wicker ([e-mail]. mil); Mcmillan, Ian
Cc: Alexandra Jones; Betsy Drake; Wicker, Michael; Arrance, Keven
Subject: Western Wake Regional WW Mang. Fac: SAW-2005-20159, DWQ#2006-1203 Permit
Modification
Attachments: 404 401 request.pdf
Henry and Ian,
Attached please find a pdf version of a permit modification request to the Western Wake Regional Wastewater
Management Facilities 401/404 permit for a minor adjustment in the West Cary Force Main (WCFM) route to
accommodate a request from the property owners. The result of the route adjustment is a reduction (albeit minor) in
the wetland and stream impacts. Hard copies of the attached permit modification request are being mailed to each of
you.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to call me.
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Belk, P.E.
Associate - Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
4011 WestChase Blvd. Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-833-7152
919-833-1828 (Fax)
IkZEN AND SOM
Environmental Engineers & Scientists
September 27, 2011
Mr. Henry Wicker
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
4011 WestChase Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-833-7152
Fax: [phone]
Re: USACE Action ID: SAW-2005-20159
DWQ #2006-1203
Request for Permit Modification, Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management
Facility, Wake County, North Carolina
Mr. Wicker,
The Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facility (the permittee) hereby requests
authorization of a modification to the permit issued for the subject project under the United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Action ID SAW-2005-20159. The permittee
proposes a modification to the design of one portion of the West Cary Force Main (WCFM)
associated with the subject permit. The proposed realignment was requested by the property
owner. The design modification decreases the impacts to jurisdictional waters of the US as
described in the tables below and as depicted on the attached figures. The tables and figures
provided herein include only the waters of the US that are proposed to be impacted by the
WCFM portion of the project.
Impacts to wetlands that are currently permitted for the Western Wake Regional Wastewater
Management Facility (WWRWMF) project are 0.82 acre of permanent impact and 2.95 acres of
temporary impact. The WCFM portion of the project is permitted to impact 0.26 acre of
permanent and 0.76 acre of temporary wetland impacts. Impacts to jurisdictional streams that
are currently permitted for the WWRWMF project include 378 feet of permanent impacts (232
feet of perennial and 146 feet of intermittent channel) and 1,816 feet of temporary impacts
(1,014 feet of perennial and 802 feet of intermittent channel). Impacts to streams that have
been permitted within the WCFM portion of the project include 18 feet of permanent and 110
feet of temporary impacts to perennial streams. If the design modification is authorized as
requested, impacts to wetlands will decrease by 0.04 acre of permanent impact and 0.10 acre of
temporary impact, and temporary impacts to perennial streams will decrease by 28 feet. No
change in the length of stream proposed to be permanently impacted will occur due to the
design modification.
New York, NY - Armonk, NY - Woodbury, NY - Detroit, MI - Raleigh, NC - Charlotte, NC 9 Atlanta, GA - Fairfax, VA - Hollywood, FL - Boca Raton, FL - Fort Pierce, FL* Sarasota, FL - Miami, FL - Philadelphia, PA
1JHLdd\ AND1.1O1 LR
Mr. Wicker
September 27, 2011
Page 2
Tahle 1 Wetland Imnacts Mann the Pronosed West Carv Force Main
Wetland
Impact
Area Wetland Type Permitted
Temporary
Impacts ac Permitted
Permanent
Impacts ac Proposed
Temporary
Impacts ac Proposed
Permanent
Im acts ac
1 Forested 0.029 0.009 -- --
2 Forested 0.076 0.026 --
3 Forested 0.029 0.010 -- -
4 Forested 0.466 0.154 0.439 0.143
5 Forested 0.041 0.014 0.041 0.014
6 Forested 0.123 0.044 0.123 0.044
1A Forested -- -- 0.018 0.005
2A Forested -- -- 0.011 0.003
3A Forested -- -- 0.027 0.011
Total 0.76 0.26 0.66 0.22
Tahlp 9 Stream Imnarts Mom the Pronosed West Carv Force Main
Stream
Impact Area Stream Type Permitted
Permanent
Impacts ft Permitted
Temporary
Impacts ft Proposed
Permanent
Impacts ft Proposed
Temporary
Impacts (ft)
1 Perennial -- 60 --
2 Perennial 18 50 18 50
1A Intermittent -- -- -- 32
Total 18 110 18 82
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 919.863.9350.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
-KW-eA?t,0-4A??
Keven Arrance
Scientist
CC: Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
Alex Jones, Town of Cary
Betsy Drake, Town of Cary
Michael Wicker, Withers and Ravenel
Chris Belk, Hazen and Sawyer
File
Attachments
j /
\ t ",1 L 1
F ?
14 +?\ +.
i ? 1
• r
x F 1
?I t ? ? t •ar? J
' • • tip f ?`"°-..,. -.. -
West Cary
_ t
6
Pump Station
01
f ? ? y se
r i yy
rz-
"^s l
C7
4
1,000 500 0 1,000 Ft '? '•*
r
\»1 inch = 1,000 feet t W
N Figure 1: USGS Topographic Quadrangle
aAW A I HAZENAND SAWYER Green Level, North Carolina
Environmental Engineers & Scientists Western Wake Partners - West Cary Force Main
Wake County, North Carolina

q4es"
?evek?d
Glee,
c?
O 1 West Cary
Pump Station
n
WCFM Stream 1A
97
a?41OPP"F- Figure 2a
Proposed Alignment of
West Cary Force Main
Construction Corridor
Figure 2b
1 WCFM Stream 1 1
WCFM Wetland Area 1A
Permitted Alignment of
West Cary Force Main
Construction Corridor
WCFM Wetland Area 1
I WCFM Stream 1
WCFM Wetland Area 2
WCFM Wetland Area 3
600 300 0 600 Ft I WCFM Wetland Area 5
\ 1 inch = 600 feet
WCFM Wetland Area 3A
WCFM Wetland Area 4
Figure 2c
N Figure 2: Wetland and Stream Impacts
HAZENAND SAWYER Overall Alignment and Index
Environmental Engineers 8 Scientists Western Wake Partners - West Cary Force Main
Wake County, North Carolina
WCFM Wetland Area 2A
WCFM Stream 1A
West Cary
Pump Station
Temporary Impact
Intermittent Stream
32 feet
Legend
Temporary Impacts (Stream)
100 50 0 100 Ft
1 inch = 100 feet
N Figure 2a: Wetland and Stream Impacts
HAZEN AND SAWYER Stream 1 A
Environmental Engineers & Scientists Western Wake Partners- West Cary Force Main
Wake County, North Carolina
Temporary Impact
Forested Wetland
(0.011 acre)
WCFM Wetland Area 2A
Permanent Impact
Forested Wetland
(0.003 acre)
Temporary Impact
Forested Wetland
(0.027 acre)
Temporary Impact
Forested Wetland
(0.439 acre)
WCFM Wetland Area 3A
Permanent Impact
Forested Wetland
(0.011 acre)
Permanent Impact
Forested Wetland
(0.143 acre)
WCFM Wetland Area 4
Legend
Permanent Impacts
_ Temporary Impacts
100 50 0 100 Ft
1 inch = 100 feet
N Figure 2c: Wetland and Stream Impacts
HAZEN AND SAWYER Wetland Areas 2A, 3A, and 4
MAW Environmental Engineers & Scientists Western Wake Partners -West Cary Force Main
Wake County, North Carolina
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S?qa v1A I A - UT tv W 0e o4, cote k
Date: I Project/Site: ?ul Latitude:
Evaluator: t County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent el
- Stream Determination (circle one) Other
r
,
if> 19 or perennial if? 30' Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
I` Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool se uence 0
J 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 51 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No 0 Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = __ . )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 CT:) 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria (ID 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No 10 Yes le ?)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= S rTz )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 ?r5) 1 1.5
25. Algae 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = .75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:
NC DWn Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I?+ 1-00 Project/Site:wkitt004-Ua t-si Latitude: 35, 4Lt_-( 40
Evaluator: LD 1'6o If, KA yyan Ck_ County: Longitude: (0)11W
Total Points: 4-0

Stream is at feast intermittent
0
Stream Determination (circle one

E
hemeral Intermittent erenn is
Other

Quad Name:
e
g

0
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30" ?/
p
.
.
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1°- Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure: ex, riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelict floodplain 0 1 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 3
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Ye = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R HvrimInnv fSuhtntal = 10 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Ye = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = 11
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 Oz) 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1.5
25. Algae 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed py? FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: w lXY V,oI p City/County: 1 ? Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: Ww Km h-r State: Sampling Point: \N
z-3
Investigator(s): L V I I KAY" t??" .?" Section, Township, Range:
Landfonm (hillslope, terrace, etc.): &N QjjLska?c7p*ocal relief (concave, convex, none): C OVA CAV-e- Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MI-RA): p Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: V-?Q.A(111?-F?YJC_ %?/u ? bm NWI classification: PFO ?G
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Ttsa)' on,- CTCU,
OK w-6faJ wwP vv?t Q - 1 cbe,Qed as w
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) - Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (B1) - Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) - Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) - Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
_ Iron Deposits (B5) __,,.Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139) Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (813) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
X
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): ?/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes /- No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
VV(7vu
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: ` l-3 W
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Pr CL.- n-,-b rLt m % Cover
2-0 Species? Status
0 -? Number of Dominant Species
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAG: (A)
2. 0 AA, yL. q V JG wU?

3.
%rlrr`Yl,(AS17? Ge?C? Total Number of Dominant Q
Species Across All Strata: l? (B)
4.
5 Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL
FACW
or FAC
??
A/B
,
,
:
(
)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total % Cover of Multiply by:
.
'- = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = -
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species I `t D x2= 36D
1. ?7 u LAa Sd 405 qVUA1 FAC species 2 c3 t7 x 3 = U aO
2. __
JftfU i Vl,(Q,Gtit, ?dLS ?i? C FACU species -- x4=
--
3. "?- UPL species x 5 --
4. Column Totals: 610 (A) 1150 (13)

5 5-1
6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
a.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 JL 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
10. 3'- 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
-

=
Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb
Stratum
(P
lot siz data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)

1. e
y
" ??
'
t,c.YftefUS $J?1gOSe?IS
?Qy
1// _ CyJ
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.

3' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
b

4 e present, unless disturbed or problematic.
. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or

7 more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

e.
Sapling/3hrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 31n
OBH and
r
t
th
3
28 ft
t
1
ll
.
g
ea
er
an
.
(
m)
a
.
10.
11 Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
12.
=Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
` _ height.
1." ?' tLaAt ??fu.tn?i?ut.
a $O ve
v-?,Itc

2.
LO I. gg:m 3gf(2 ? uA-
20 _
_
VeA
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
V
i

6. egetat
on
Present? Yes X No
V = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
I", ?

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: VJ2-3 w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Tvne Loc Texture Remarks
0-I 1b` 9,5 1 85 lob QS I5 ?,K TL Ct"I
'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) - 2 crn Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) A Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147,148) ^ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ^ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (34) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: v
V
=
Depth (inches): No
Hydr,,S,1Isent? Yes
Remarks:
q6
Y` v L
l
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProiecVSite: Vy CF Y I/? p City/County: ? Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: yj°w1?.pwIt_/ A State: ?C Sampling Point: W2 3
Investigator(s): rKA t?,a? n c_Q_ Section, Township, Range:
Landfomr (hillslope, terrace, etc.): -t-?bOGC.IJ?I Q,/?L Local relief (concave, convex, none): CLCIR Vp- Slope 0'Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): CWJ tf Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: w ULC 5,7 `t- l60-ins NWI classification: pr r rw I-G
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes %/- No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 4 No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No y- within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X

E 70;
1-z LA& ejc.e.UA, CFPN 4? weed
HYDROLOGY
vveaana myarology tnatcators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PP imary Indicators tminimum of one is required : check all that a-pp!yl _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
- Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drainage Patterns (810)
_- Saturation (A3) - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
- Water Marks (81) - Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
- Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
- Drift Deposits (B3) - Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
- Algal Mat or Crust (84) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
- Iron Deposits (B5) _ ;Geomorphic Position (D2)
- Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
- Water-Stained Leaves (B9) T Microtopographic Relief (D4)
- Aquatic Fauna (B13) - FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No A Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Y. Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
I ?m
?C)
I
II n I,, cO ,,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? _ Status
?-
2. AC X.V- n ?lOYt LM Z 5-
3. L; -AaMMt WW Sft,h2lG 2S S Y1°tGt
4. ?tL!sk!PAILU S V r `dam V-M- I r't a ?flU? `
5.
6.
7.
8.
?U = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. k9^' YV 4r( Art -- - ' -
2. "-Cf-
?
3. TJ& D ZC ? FrC-_
4. ffiAeMA `k Zv I?L? C t?
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. POCLU-cu - tap V 16%
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 'Ctrc? ° 'G? 3o 7 ?J AC-
'n - C
2. ' Yisi l r? (PC)
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: W 2 -3 U
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species coq
That Are 06L, FACW, or FAC: U Y 7 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 = '-
FACW species - x 2 =
FAC species 2,qo x 3 =
FACU species 0 x 4 = 120
UPL species - x 5 = -
Column Totals: 3 20 (A) 910 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.09
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problernatic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Saplingl6hrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. t§BH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -,AII herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Y = Total Cover
olude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
too doy"Na-ttij species ogre s
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: W Z - 3 U
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color (moist) % Color (moist % Toe Loc Texture Remarks
0- t3 Ioye --Iq 9s ?oY? 57p A-5 C M laa. -
'Type: C=Concentration. D.=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
- Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
- Histic Epipedon (A2) - Polyvalue Below Surface (88) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
- Black Histic (A3) ! Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
- Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) - Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) - Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
- 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) - Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
- Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) - Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Depressions (F8) - Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, - Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) - Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_.. Sandy Radox (S5) - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
1
I ? t ?-J 11 ? (. T'li

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont I..
ProjecUSite: WCFfI1 City/County: Wlf< 4, e Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: wwJ -V `-F State: -W- - Sampling Point: W 3-
Investigator(s): L U I??X.b K?f" }aa Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 0- ?&4t C7^- Local relief (concave, convex, none): GOV'i CRV`E Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: AiA 5 Ic NWI classification: Y) A
Are climatic/ hydrologic con itions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks,)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _2?, No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
-
Z-SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -? No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Y_ No
\k)k)Ra,tuQ e0-virV C-#5 1?b MAf ffj U ?e:? Ca.f,? wl(„pac axcA w4
w6u& %vtq a-c?- 0'" 2A
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requiredi
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) - Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al) - True Aquatic Plants (B14) - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) - Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) ',, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) , Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAG-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
a s c o Alq?'ruxes d awjrv-da'-e-?, wo?.t? (Wgj yeas -per
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: w 3 ! t

Tree Stratum (Plot size: }
1. ?I ru.t.,S fa e off..

2. &_;lLkA_OL i1 ?s rc? Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Ll 0 lljp?

30 ya ph-cw Dominance Test worksheet:

Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

3. Fl? er (t-??7/i .+?
?[ d C Total Number of Dominant
S
ecies Across All Strat
(?

4.
5 p
a:
(g)
Percent of Dominant Species
(? !

6. --- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
O (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8, Total % Cover of. Multiply bv:

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Ti C l "AAS (A eafa = Total Cover
)
Z5 Vt? F-6- _ G OBL species x 1 = -
FACW species I I V x2= 2'ZO
FAC species 25S x 3 = S_
2. AC2r nkA-L41' ID ItS -:j+C FACU species x4 = `
3. Ub cuG?Q.r?t be?i' SJt?vR C ? ?+ qL) _ icPt f?KIGt
' UPL species -- x 5 =
4. fit rbiitG[$ ('a .?U>ire.?- l? ??
Q< Column Totals: (A) 9 $? (B)
5.
-
8 +0
Prevalence Index = B/A = Z.
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g. 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
10.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'

Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. CA44XvU-S 'S YLLI
2. ?3. guy e • s • a
3. _ =Total Cover

?D Jet fww
?{D 47 brut - 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)

'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must

4. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or

7' more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
hei
ht

8. g
.
g Sapling/9lhrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
th
b

10. an 3 in.
BH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
11.
12. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
d
l
' ?
` _ =Total Cover
) Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
1.
L,
OLY, yb* --.
l i
0. ?o y
_s F
?

2. Lax i C cru ?c pip CA
3. t
?
--
50 JGj r'/ T ?'
4.
5 Hydrophytic

6. Vegetation
Present? Yes J? No
-T
J = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers hero or on a separate sheet.)
.t.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: Wj:?f_W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Type Loc Texture Remarks
d-12 l?`??4(t 90 IoYR 5 RM TL_ rf??rl
-'Type: Concentration D=De letion RM=Roduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
_ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 em Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) - Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F!) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umhric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
S
ho Y'Q? 1 e yt c&u_.cf -t?re4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Vi ? r?,? WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern ,Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: UJ l/i'Yy I City/County: W OLkk Sampling Date: _6 TA-0-di
LU W F State: IL C_ Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): ?- Section, Township, Range: a ?.v? n ?r n
Landforrn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Sd?I t?l y Slope Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: 10&,01 NWI classification: !? 1,Q
Are climatic / hydrologic condi ns on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V-- No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ``//
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Y_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V- within a Wetland? ,/,
Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No -
.
Remarks:
ice- re c4, CA k* Uer o ?-cA (a.bo?,?$ I Obys D4
HYDROLOGY
e an Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PrimaryIndicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) - Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2) _
' Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) - Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
- Water Marks (Bi) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
- Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) - Crayfish Burrows (C8)
.- Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) - Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
- Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di )
^
- Iron Deposits (B5) _
kI.Geomorphic Position (D2)
- Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (133)
- Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
- Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAG-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
vvv
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wail, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
YYb KID
Remarks:
1n ^
V w
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Poinl: w3-`ti U
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Qwu.45 tWt_v?- 'SD BLS 01- G That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Acp-r Total Number of Dominant
p
3. Uti
Ti
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
- - -
'
Percent of Dominant Species q
y
5. (A/B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l
6
.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Mullinly by:
B.
Z d =Total Cover OBL species _ x 1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species ' x 2 =
1. {t iS
?u
_e
_ 3U V(a lr- I C-
? FAC species 2$ O x 3 = '64
11
-
LL
,,
2. Ua .i&^+txcxx - SA1k1?C-t r 1 -
a jvit's
PtC 4 FACU species S O _ x 4 = 3 ZO

1A
3.6
?CL

Z0

? Ali L -

UPL species - x 5 = -
Column Totals: (eU (A) I I (B)
4
5. Prevalence Index = B/A = ?j .2 2

6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
1
, 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
9. _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10. _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum {Plot size:
-?
f C,_u-S )

'XI ctt f

_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2, OCLUAJz_ I S o
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7, height.
8.
Sapling/Sihrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. bBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
d
less
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regar
11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
L D C Woody vine -- All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
over
=Total height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
jUj A, ?0 !•
1. Zo ?-A4
c
2. OYNI l?C /8 ?T tfL a t t
_- r-
3. ?PLSP.`N J?c? S?vuO YNy O-f?t S
Lrc-s
_L
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
Present? Yes No
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
y 0uxk? I u vt vt Coo P?

no S-tYC>V?D??
`C_ 1\
(rf?-Ctti! 0C0??-)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: Va-L{
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Toe Loc Texture Remarks

'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains, 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) - Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histlc Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
- Black Histic (A3) - Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) - Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) - Redox Dark Surface (F6) _. Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) - Depleted Dark Surface (F7) - Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_. Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, - Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
i
YU) (110-Sty) C CActun 1-erd
"o k?dKc_ 1 i Vkcu co ob?e?v?e?
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: %] l ,?:-I`A 9-F City/County: W UC 6 Sampling Date: I-f N? I
Applicant/Owner: tW W (Lyj t1 State: N L Sampling Point: _
Investigator(s): U V t ?o t-' K A(Ya ?i C2-- p.Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): "CL, 0VX ?iCU b gbcal relief (concave, convex, none): C Dr10QV`f Slope (%): Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ((?? Let: Long: D turn:
Soil Map Unit Name: 9,00- l9b ?301?LG?U 100LWM NWI classification: Vl
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
o?n n?,pac r? ?s, 00-A&AAA U-)3 A
HYDROLOGY
Pdmarv Indicators (minimum of one is recuired• check all that aoolyl _ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Drainage Patterns (BID)
_ Saturation (A3) - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) - Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) - Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (133)
- Water-Stained Leaves (139) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
- Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): W
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
(Plot size: )
Sampling Point: W4-Sul
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Soecies7 Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: S (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover )
1. Liq ar ,?vimdiP-tc _ U 0 \Its FAC4-
2. fi0.CG?t riS kajjllt,i (.fa E -:jn FA-G
3.-VIV,6?7 tfkt q0 FR-(-
4. Ca.btnusW VOL(D(l'ttiianCk 6 c
5.
6.
7.
6.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
'10 = Total Cnvar
1. 51-.4'lCAAS e-Wk su s VS
2. K"%4 0.,M&hAs no
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I DD (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL species '?- x 1 = -'
FACW species --8 5 _ x 2 =
FAC species 2,0 0 x 3 = Lo 00
FACU species 15 x 4 = (00
UPL species X5= --
Column Totals: 00 (A) 830 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2-7+7-
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
I Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (D8H), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBI-I and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -- All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: i-S =Total Cover
)
i, Ztl?x (Q?uaL?f f. G a ?? YQ S 5??
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
- 7-- -
= Total Cover
:Iude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) "A41- -h '10 3UVyC)LkVqC&,?
C "P 'CLb seo-
av? I? Ct e?, t 5,&V?A j s
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _ No

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: wq-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0- 1Z ICNR 5/1 RO IDYl2 sq to 12.M PL -aljj.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
T Histic Eplpedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (85)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
educed Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) - Piedmont Floodpiain Solis (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12)
Redox Depressions (F8) - Other (Explain in Remarks)
- Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
- Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
h o r'ZStn
o) Q
-RIM
Hydric Soli Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: Vv vW City/County: Sampling Date: Nla r !
Applicant/Owner: y V W K w FF State: N C- Sampling Point: VVL4-,s
Investigator(s): Lb) eob0 R- , K, c k- Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 'Yt/?t. S?OtLC. Local relief (concave, convex, none): CDYtfA Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ED- Let: Long: Datu :
Soil Map Unit Name: ?o &A0 tl S O C? ?tiVl NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yea4 Yes ?<_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _Y No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No Y,_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
W e`?\&AAA rl ok fyu+
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
- _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3) - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) - Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ^ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
- Drift Deposits (133) _. . Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
- Algal Mat or Crust (134) - Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
_ Iron Deposits (85) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
- Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
- Aquatic Fauna (813) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No 7( Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
,^,``(('' yy 1\o ??C?? N ?AO?t wdiw0afS c)bse,4 U4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: VJ Lf-: U
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. AC-,- vu-b yl.c?,-. Zo C11- ?ftc That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: * (A)
2 LI t t i (?Y?l'l t ?i(Li?1?f'f 2 ! t:tcF?.t?o? 2-0 Mct
.
S p
(?
? U es - Total Number of Dominant
B
?
3. fl
.
?j EAU _ )
(
Species Across All Strata: _
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
60
5. (A/B)
FACW, or FAC:
That Are OBL
,
6
.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
?{(? = Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 =
1. 'J?UAL orAG.CA -t In vi V FAC species Z 10 x 3 = Ce50T
2 PZr q, -tdl<AA. 2 N (6 fA"C FACU species x 4 =
3. I 'VW S CA-(bL.iYt1?Ll. t/?0. _ UPL species x 5 =
4 V1l..bfL-Lyle 20 CGS }C Column Totals: (A) kP 3CD (B)
5.
3
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9. _c 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10. '

O = Total Cover (Provide supporting
4 - Morphological Adaptations
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
? )
ip (' ?o _
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. OdtRVJL

'
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. unless disturbed or problematic.
be present
,
4. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6 ardless of
re
ht (DBH)
ter at breast hei
i
di
g
,
g
n
ame
more
7. height.
8.
i
i
l
ng v
nes,
ess
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, exclud
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
11. and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
of size
,
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
?S = Total Cover height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
-
1. S,vi?LVG t'alwrtioG a'Lc l?G
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
No
Y
6 es
Present?
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Md-LLAYT 6?0-6d

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: V'j -S LA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
o-1 tC) 13 ?s ?o1K!*4 ?s P, W1 PL ?rla.P,
'Type: C=Concentration D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
Histosol (Al)
- _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) - Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147, 148)
- Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) - Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) - Depleted Matrix (173) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface
T (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Redox Depressions (F8) - Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ^ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) - Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) ^ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
ji 1? '-A r V l L -?i? ? e?
ts V,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version